PORQUE  AQUÍ  NO  TENEMOS  MUERTOS:     DÍA  DE  LOS  MUERTOS  AND  THE  CONSTRUCTION  OF  SELF  IN  A  NEW  SPACE     By     William  Shelton  Escalante                           A  THESIS     Submitted  to     Michigan  State  University     in  partial  fulfillment  of  the  requirements     for  the  degree  of     Sociology  –  Master  of  Arts     2015                                       ABSTRACT     PORQUE  AQUÍ  NO  TENEMOS  MUERTOS:     DÍA  DE  LOS  MUERTOS  AND  THE  CONSTRUCTION  OF  SELF  IN  A  NEW  SPACE     By     William  Shelton  Escalante   There  is  an  increasing  popularity  for  celebrating  Día  de  los  Muertos  -­‐  Day  of  the  Dead  in  the   United   States   of   America.   Día   de   los   Muertos   is   a   cultural   and   religious   holiday   that   is   most   commonly   associated   with   Mexican   descendants   and   has   been   designated   as   a   time   to   remember,  honor,  and  visit  with  deceased  loved  ones.    This  paper  explores  the  celebrations  of   Día   de   los   Muertos   in   a   Michigan   city   using   conceptual   tools   of   culture,   migration,   and   identity.   The   intent   is   to   comprehend   why   and   how   Mexican   migrants   to   the   Michigan   area   use   this   traditional   activity   to   construct   their   social   identity   within   the   United   States   of   America.     The   guiding  research  questions  were:  1)  How  do  Mexican  migrants  in  mid-­‐Michigan  celebrate  Día  de   los   Muertos;   and   2)   What   is   the   role   of   the   celebration   in   developing   a   sense   of   Mexican   ethnic   identity  for  these  migrants?       To   address   these   questions,   I   conducted   an   exploratory   qualitative   research   project   that   employed   interview   and   observational   data   collected   through   participant   observation   and   in-­‐ person  interview.    The  research  found  that  the  majority  of  respondents  who  celebrate  use  Día   de   los   Muertos   as   a   way   to   remember   deceased   loved   ones   but   more   significantly,   as   part   of   their   construction   of   new   Mexican-­‐centered   identities   and   self   within   an   Anglo-­‐American   social   context  that  pressures  them  to  adopt  the  new  U.S.  way  of  life.                                                       Copyright  By   WILLIAM  SHELTON  ESCALANTE   2015     TABLE  OF  CONTENTS         LIST  OF  TABLES  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  v     LIST  OF  FIGURES  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .vi     INTRODUCTION  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  1     RATIONALE  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  3     CONCEPTUAL  FRAMEWORK  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  5     Culture  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .5     Identity  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  6       METHODS  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  9     Pre-­‐Research  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .9   Notes  On  Terms  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  10   Día  de  los  Muertos  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .11   Location  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .13   Population  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .15   Participant  Observation  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .16     Interviews  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .17     Analysis  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .18     DATA  AND  ANALYSIS  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  19     Día  de  los  Muertos  In  Mid-­‐Michigan  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .    .19     Obstacles  To  Celebration  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .23     Cultural  Heritage  In  A  New  Place  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  26     SUMMARY  COMMENTS  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .28     BIBLIOGRAPHY  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  31               iv   LIST  OF  TABLES         Table  1:  Gender  and  Place  of  Birth  by  Research  Site  (N=30)  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  16                                                                                 v   LIST  OF  FIGURES         Figure  1:  Photo  1  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  20     Figure  2:  Photo  2  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  21                                                                           vi   INTRODUCTION   There   is   increasing   popularity   of   Día   de   los   Muertos   -­‐   Day   of   the   Dead,   a   cultural   and   religious  holiday  that  is  most  commonly  associated  with  Mexico  and  is  designated  as  a  time  to   remember,  honor,  and  visit  with  relatives  and  loved  ones  who  are  deceased.    Mexican  migrants   use  this  and  other  traditional  Mexican  cultural  activities  to  construct  their  identity  as  Mexican   in   the   United   States   of   America.     Though   migrants   do   not   lose   their   sense   of   self   while   crossing   physical,   political,   social   and   cultural   boundaries,   components   of   their   sense   of   self   are   challenged  in  unforeseen  ways.    The  new  country  and  social  order  has  its  own  values,  beliefs,   and   patterns   of   behavior.     This   includes   preconceived   ideas   and   prejudices   about   immigrants   and  their  country  of  origin  (Cadge  et  al.  2010).    The  American  social  context,  the  immigrant’s   receiving   community,   does   not   readily   affirm   or   support   their   regular   behavior   patterns.     Therefore,   the   taken-­‐for-­‐granted   external   cultural   validation   of   a   person’s   sense   of   self   and   behaviors   that   reinforce   their   sense   of   personhood   in   their   country   of   origin   are   no   longer   present  in  their  new  social  context.   The   current   paper   presents   exploratory   qualitative   research   with   Mexican   men   and   women   who  have  migrated  to  the  Mid-­‐Michigan  area  to  determine  if  they  celebrate  Día  de  los  Muertos,   and  whether  or  not  such  activities  do  or  do  not  enhance  their  sense  of  cultural  identity.    This   paper   brings   literature   on   culture   into   conversation   with   literature   on   identity   and   migration   through  consideration  of  the  following  questions:     1)   How   do   Mexican   migrants   in   mid-­‐Michigan   celebrate   Día   de   los   Muertos?     1   2)   What   is   the   role   of   the   celebration   in   developing   a   sense   of   Mexican/ethnic  identity  for  the  migrants?       To   address   the   aforementioned   questions,   I   use   data   from   an   empirical   field   research   project  of  Mexico-­‐born  individuals  who  migrated  to  the  mid-­‐Michigan  area  to  report  the  ways   they   do   or   do   not   use   traditional   Mexican   cultural   activities   to   assist   in   constructing   their   identity.     My   discussion   includes   a   rationale   for   the   research   and   clarification   of   the   conceptual   framework,  followed  by  a  description  of  the  methods  employed  in  data  collection.    During  my   discussion   of   methods   I   provide   background   information   gained   through   pre-­‐research   on   my   research   location,   population,   and   a   brief   history   of   Día   de   los   Muertos   for   further   contextualization.    The  paper  concludes  with  a  presentation  of  the  data  and  analysis,  along  with   summary  comments  that  include  directions  for  future  research.               2   RATIONALE     The   current   research   contributes   to   sociological   knowledge   conceptually   and   empirically.     This   paper   engages   the   concepts   of   migration,   culture   and   identity   for   how   these   aid   our   understanding  of  how  Mexican  migrants  create  culture  and  construct  their  identity  while  living   in   conditions   of   migration.     Conceptually   most   sociological   research   has   discussed   immigrant   identity  and  adaptation  through  the  lens  of  assimilation.    Such  an  approach  does  not  place  the   behavior   of   Mexican   migrants   at   the   center   of   investigation   nor   prioritize   their   intentions   in   undertaking  such  action.  This  paper  addresses  gaps  in  the  sociological  literature  by  specifically   focusing   on   how   the   celebration   of   a   holiday   that   is   pervasive   in   Mexico   may   affirm   an   identity   as  Mexican  within  the  social  context  of  the  United  States  of  America.    My  focus  here  is  to  begin   to  understand  how  migrants  use  traditions  from  their  country  of  origin  to  construct  a  sense  of   self  in  their  new  social  context.         Recently,  sociologists  have  demonstrated  interest  in  the  “new  destinations”  of  immigrants   (Benjamin-­‐Alvarado,  DeSipio,  and  Montoya  2009;  Bernosky  de  Flores  2010;  Cadge  et  al.  2008;   Fischer  2010;  Kandel  and  Parrado  2005;  Lichter  2012;  Lichter  et  al.  2010;  Marrow  2005;  Massey   2008;   Pfeffer   and   Parra   2008;   Sáenz   2012).     These   “new   destinations”   are   located   in   the   Midwestern  and  Southern  regions  of  the  United  States  away  from  the  cities  and  communities   that   have   traditionally   received   immigrants.     Even   with   this   new   focus,   sociological   research   on   new   migratory   destinations   has   focused   on   the   changing   demographics   of   rural   areas   due   to   new  in-­‐migration  and  the  incorporation  of  new  immigrants  into  new  destination  communities.     To   this   end,   the   economic   impact   of   immigrants,   health   care   and   social   service   delivery   gaps,   educational  needs,  and  racial  ethnic  relations  between  migrants  and  long-­‐standing  community     3   residents   have   been   central   concerns.     However,   there   is   a   dearth   of   knowledge   regarding   cultural   production   of   Mexican   migrants   in   new   destinations   and   its   role   in   identity   construction.       The   present   research   focuses   on   the   Mexican   holiday   of   Día   de   los   Muertos   in   the   new   destination  locale  of  a  Mid-­‐Michigan  city.    I  focus  on  the  actions  that  Mexican  migrants  carry   out   and   glean   the   significance   of   those   activities   in   relation   to   their   identity   as   Mexican   in   their   Michigan   community.     Research   on   culture   creation   and   identity   construction   in   the   new   destinations   of   Mid-­‐Michigan   offers   further   insight   into   how   Mexican   and   other   racial/ethnic   migrant  groups  adapt  to  their  new  social  context  (Hurtado,  Gurin,  and  Peng  1994).    Sociologists   have  been  primarily  concerned  with  the  contexts  of  reception  and  immigrant  incorporation  in   the  Midwestern  region  of  the  United  States  (Lichter  et  al.  2010;  Marrow  2005;  Pfeffer  and  Parra   2008).     Anthropologists   and   scholars   in   the   cultural   studies   arena   have   been   the   primary   researchers   interested   in   the   Day   of   the   Dead   social   phenomena   in   Mexico   and   the   United   States  of  America  (Brandes  1988,  1998a,  1998b,  2006;  Cadaval  1985;  Garcíagodoy  1998;  Marchi   2009,   2013;   Norget   2006).     The   current   research   seeks   to   address   some   of   these   sociological   knowledge   gaps   about   this   social   phenomenon   as   a   creative   cultural   expression   through   qualitative  field  research  on  Día  de  los  Muertos  celebration  practices  among  Mexican  migrants   in  Mid-­‐Michigan.           4   CONCEPTUAL  FRAMEWORK     Human  beings  are  biologically  predisposed  to  group  life.    From  birth  humans  interact  with   and   among   one   another,   their   physical   world,   and   do   so   by   engaging   the   stock   of   knowledge   of   their  respective  social  group  about  how  and  interact  with  their  surrounding  physical  and  social   worlds  (Berger  and  Luckmann  1967).    Human  groups  create  culture  and  develop  “knowledge”   through  typified  behavior,  or  those  repeated  patterns  of  behavior  that  characterizes  the  group   (Berger  and  Luckmann  1967).    Human  self-­‐organization  happens  when  individuals  formally  and   informally   organize   around   a   particular   typified   behavior.     It   is   the   interaction   of   social   group   members   that   reinforces   and   communicates   their   specific   stock   of   knowledge.     These   human   behavior   patterns   and   knowledge   govern   the   production   and   standards   of   culture,   discussed   next,  that  provide  meaning  and  importance  to  the  social  structure  as  well  as  the  values,  beliefs,   and  practices  embedded  in  it  (Berger  and  Luckmann  1967;  Williams  1981).   CULTURE   -­‐   Culture   consists   of   the   “dynamic   patterns   of   learned   values,   beliefs   and   behaviors   (as   behaviors   are   derived   from   values   and   beliefs)   exhibited   by   a   people   who   share   a   history   (at   least   one   hundred   years)   and   geographic   proximity   (Dodson   and   Ross   1977).”     Culture   is   concerned   with   the   subjective   meanings   of   human   behavior   and   aligns   humans’   activity   with   what   is   symbolically   important,   the   values   and   beliefs,   to   different   social   groups   and   the   larger   society.     Through   this   relationship   with   the   social   order,   human   beings   create   internal   organizations   and/or   social   networks   that   arrange   rewards   and   penalties   based   on   “values”  and  integrate  social  institutions.    As  a  system  of  meaning,  it  is  through  cultural  activity   that   human   beings   communicate,   reproduce,   experience,   explore   and   challenge   the   social   order.    Culture  is  therefore  more  than  styles  of  art,  language,  or  type  of  intellectual  work,  but     5   serves   as   strategies   of   action   for   human   beings   (Swidler   1986;   Williams   1981).     The   action   strategies,  behavior  patterns  that  shape  and  are  shaped  by  values  and  beliefs,  are  developed  to   navigate  a  specific  social  order.    Residence  in  a  new  society  will  cause  the  action  strategies  to   be  criticized  and  changed.    Such  migration  will  force  changes  in  the  culture  of  the  migrants,  as   culture   cannot   be   wholly   reproduced   in   a   new   geographic   location.   This   is   true   regardless   of   level  of  social  status,  access  to  resources,  social  conditions  prior  to  and  post  migration  as  well   as   the   lack   of   choice   that   characterizes   some   migratory   experiences   (Mintz   and   Price   1992).   Therefore,  migrants  create  new  cultural  practices  for  their  new  geographic  and  social  locations   based  in  the  action  strategies  and  knowledge  from  their  cultures  of  origin.     IDENTITY  -­‐  Aspects  of  a  person’s  sense  of  self  that  are  derived  from  knowledge  of  belonging   to   social   categories   or   groups   coupled   with   value   and   emotional   significance   attached   to   membership   are   Social   Identities   (Hurtado   et   al.   1994).     Such   identities   are   formed   through   three   steps:   social   categorization,   social   comparison   and   psychological   work.   Social   Categorization   is   the   organization   of   people   into   groups   based   on   social   and/or   physical   characteristics   (Hurtado   et   al.   1994).     Contemporary   theories   of   assimilation   hold   that   not   all   immigrants   are   integrated   into   the   American   middle   class,   contrary   to   popular   notions.     The   assimilation  of  migrants  into  the  U.S.  social  order  is  effected  by  their  ascribed  membership  in   racialized,   gendered   and   classed   groups   (Golash-­‐Boza   2006;   Kasinitz,   Mollenkopf,   and   Waters   2002;   Portes   and   Zhou   1993;   Stepick   and   Stepick   2010).     The   organization   of   individuals   into   differing   social   categories,   especially   when   those   categories   possess   differing   power   and   privilege  lead  to  the  next  step  in  social  identity  construction:  social  comparison       6   Social   comparison   is   a   tool   by   which   human   evaluate   the   established   social   categories   in   order  to  gain  importance  and  status  in  relation  to  other  groups  within  society  (Hurtado  et  al.   1994).    Traditional  US  assimilation  theory  maintained  that  immigrant  groups  would  and  should   reject  their  “inferior  and  backward”  ways  of  life  and  accept  the  “modern  and  good”  life  ways  of   the   white   Anglo   Protestant,   or   at   least   Christian,   majority   in   the   United   States   of   America   (Alba   1999;   Lee   1966;   Park   1928).     Regardless   of   cultural   adaptation,   immigrants   are   assimilated   into   different   sectors   of   the   receiving   society;   the   middle   class   mainstream,   the   marginalized   underclass,  or  the  ethnic  enclave  which  is  characterized  by  deliberate  preservation  of  identity   with  aims  toward  economic  advancement  (Portes  and  Zhou  1993).    A  person’s  phenotype,  and   social  proximity  to  marginalized  racial/ethnic  groups,  a  influences  their  social  position  impacts   how   they   are   incorporated   into   U.S.   society   (Golash-­‐Boza   2006).   Additionally,   experiences   of   discrimination,   exclusion   and   socialization   as   a   member   of   a   marginalized   group   impact   how   immigrants   view   the   receiving   society   (Golash-­‐Boza   2006;   Lopez   2003).     Membership   in   an   ethnic   group   is   often   ascribed   and   not   the   result   of   individual   choice.     Factors   such   as   residential   concentration,   skin   color,   and   language   all   contribute   to   establishing   boundaries   between  ethnic  groups  in  the  larger  society  (Nagel  1994).    However,  external  factors  separating   Mexicans   and   immigrants   from   the   Anglo   mainstream   do   not   give   a   complete   picture   of   how   migrants  construct  their  identity  within  the  social  context  of  a  new  society.   The  third  principle  of  social  identity  construction,  psychological  work,  assumes  that  people   actively  work  to  construct  a  sense  of  self  in  a  new  social  space  and  achieve  a  positive  sense  of   distinctiveness   after   having   been   categorized   as   a   marginalized   group.     The   social   categories   most   likely   to   become   identities   are   those   that   are   most   visible,   contested,   and   denigrated.       7   Social   groups   with   power   and   privilege   in   society   do   not   “need”   a   specific   identity,   and   are   therefore  less  obvious.    Typically  such  groups  are  considered  the  norm  or  “normal  (Hurtado  et   al.   1994).”     Within   such   a   social   context   oppressed   people   engage   in   psychological   work,   and   validate  their  sense  of  themselves  as  they  understand  it,  by  reproducing  cultural  activities  from   their  country  of  origin  regardless  of  messages  from  the  larger  society.    Such  cultural  activities   cannot  be  reproduced  in  the  form  of  an  exact  copy  of  what  is  practiced  in  the  cultural  and  social   context   of   origin.   Restricted   access   to   the   same   material,   natural,   social,   and   other   resources   prohibits  creation  of  exact  replications  (Mintz  and  Price  1992).   It   is   through   continued   modified   reproduction   of   cultural   activities   while   in   marginalized   social   conditions   that   migrants   maintain   or   recreate   a   sense   of   self   as   culturally   distinct   from   the  hegemonic  mainstream  of  the  receiving  society  (Mintz  and  Price  1992).    The  reproduction   of   cultural   behaviors   from   their   country   of   origin   and   the   construction   of   identity   serves   as   a   method  of  adaptation  to  life  in  the  United  States.    Cultural  patterns,  such  as  cultural  or  religious   holidays,   traditional   foods,   politics   and/or   concepts,   can   be   converted   into   symbols   characterized   by   nostalgia   for   the   culture   of   the   immigrant   generation’s   country   of   origin.     These  behaviors  create  a  positive  sense  of  being  Mexican  in  a  social  context  where  members  of   the  Mexican  ethnic  group  are  marginalized.  This  “symbolic  ethnicity”  requires  the  presence  of  a   group,   the   passage   of   time,   and   may   help   explain   the   continuation   of   cultural   communities.     Thus,   Even   as   groups   adapt   to   and   integrate   with   the   social   order   of   the   United   States,   identification  with  a  non-­‐Anglo-­‐American  cultural  heritage  does  not  necessarily  disappear  (Gans   1979;  Hurtado  et  al.  1994).           8   METHODS   PRE-­‐RESEARCH   -­‐   Consistent   with   the   African   Atlantic   Research   Team’s   orientation   toward   conducting   qualitative   field   research,   prior   to   any   contact   with   a   field   site   or   participants   I   conducted  “pre-­‐research.”    This  phase  of  the  project  “consists  of  in-­‐depth  reviews  of  historical   and   social   conditions   for   people   and   situations   of   the   research   topics   (Dodson   2012).”     As   a   member   of   this   research   collective,   I   utilized   the   Team’s   orientation   to   inform   my   understandings   about   contemporary   and   past   Día   De   Los   Muertos   celebrations   in   the   United   States   and   Mexico.   I   also   utilized   the   method   of   pre-­‐research   to   understand   the   history   regarding   Latinos/as,   more   specifically   Mexicans,   in   twentieth   century  Michigan.     I   also   became   more   familiar   with   previous   theorizing   and   conceptualizations   of   the   holiday   which   assisted   my   own  interpretations  of  the  significance  of  Día  De  Los  Muertos  to  Mexicans  in  Mid-­‐Michigan.   Additionally,   pre-­‐research   made   me   aware   of   how   my   personal   biography   may   effect   my   data  collection  (Berg  2009).    I  shared  some  commonalities  with  the  research  participants  such   as  Spanish  fluency,  previous  familiarity  and  experience  with  the  holiday,  and  a  cultural  heritage.     This  did  not  guarantee  entré  or  the  building  of  rapport.    However,  my  personal  particularities   may   have   facilitated   these   processes,   but   I   still   entered   their   community   as   a   stranger   conducting  research.  It  was  necessary  to  remain  conscious  of  my  position  as  a  cultural  insider,   yet  community  outsider.     As   a   part   of   my   pre-­‐research   I   identified   possible   field   sites,   community   leaders   and   “gatekeepers”   through   personal   and   social   networks   (Berg   2009).     I   completed   a   “pre-­‐test”   prior   to   data   collection   at   Mid-­‐Michigan   church   to   meet   with   the   contact   person,   discuss   the   project   and   determine   if   data   collection   was   appropriate.     At   a   Mid-­‐Michigan   elementary     9   school,   I   attended   a   Spanish   language   “parent   night”   to   determine   where   public   and/or   private   celebrations   were   taking   place   and   potentially   recruit   respondents.   Mid-­‐Michigan   church   was   selected  as  my  primary  field  site.    The  church  is  a  place  where  Día  De  Los  Muertos  is  celebrated   in   a   public   fashion,   has   a   majority   Latino/a   membership   and   a   reputation   of   service   to   the   Latino/a   community   in   the   area.     Furthermore,   church   leadership,   staff,   and   members   were   welcoming  and  willing  to  participate  in  the  project.       NOTES   ON   TERMS   -­‐   A   variety   of   terms   have   been   used   to   describe   people   of   Mexican   ancestry  living  within  the  current  borders  of  the  United  States  of  America.    Mexican  American   and  Chicano/a  have  been  used  to  describe  U.S.  citizens  by  birth  that  claim  a  Mexican  cultural   heritage   and   trace   their   roots   to   Mexico   and/or   to   the   geographic   location   known   contemporarily   as   the   U.S.   southwest.     Mexican   American   has   also   been   used   to   identify   Mexican   nationals   who   have   migrated   to   the   U.S.   and   become   naturalized   U.S.   citizens.     Chicano/a  carries  a  political  connotation  connected  to  the  Mexican  American  struggle  for  civil   rights   during   the   1960s   and   1970s   referred   to   as   the   Chicano/a   Civil   Rights   Movement.   The   category   of   Mexican   refers   to   Mexican   nationals   who   are   living   in   the   United   States   of   America   post   establishment   of   the   current   U.S.   borders   through   their   own   international   migration,   regardless   of   cause.     All   of   these   labels   for   people   of   Mexican   descent   imply   a   shared   ethnic   heritage.     Even   though   the   U.S.   government   has   declared   “Hispanic”   and   “Latino”   to   be   the   official  terms  to  identify  people  from  the  Spanish-­‐speaking  countries  in  Latin  America  and  the   Caribbean,  I  will  rarely  use  them.    Such  terms  are  too  general  for  my  purposes  here  and  their   use  would  contribute  to  misleading  homogenization  of  the  cultural  diversity  that  exists  under   the  Latino  umbrella.    10   DÍA   DE   LOS   MUERTOS   -­‐   Día   de   los   Muertos   -­‐   Day   of   the   Dead-­‐,   also   referred   to   as   Todos   los   Santos   in   other   parts   of   the   Spanish-­‐speaking   world,   takes   place   on   November   first   and   second   coinciding  with  the  observation  of  All  Saints  and  All  Souls  Days  on  the  official  Catholic  Church   calendar.    The  two  days  serve  as  a  time  to  honor  and  remember  relatives  and  loved  ones  who   have  died.    While  the  commemoration  of  deceased  loved  ones  carries  feelings  of  sorrow,  Día  de   los   Muertos   celebrations   have   qualities   of   happiness,   filled   with   color,   smiles,   and   life.     Most   commonly  associated  with  Mexico,  this  veneration  of  deceased  relatives  is  practiced  in  various   ways.     Celebrants   around   Mexico   visit   cemeteries   and   gravesites   cleaning   and   decorating   the   headstones  of  their  deceased.    People  also  bring  flowers,  prepare  large  meals  for  the  living  and   the   dead,   and   hold   candlelight   vigils   at   gravesites.     Some   families   build   altars   in   their   homes,   cemeteries   or   other   public   locales   to   welcome   the   spirits   of   their   family   members   who   have   died  (Brandes  1988,  2006;  Carmichael  and  Sayer  1992;  Marchi  2009).   While   some   debate   exists   about   the   “true”   origins   of   Día   de   los   Muertos,   it   is   widely   accepted  that  the  holiday  is  rooted  in  pre-­‐Columbian  rituals  that  venerate  ancestors  to  coincide   with   indigenous   peoples’   understandings   of   life,   death   and   agricultural   cycles   (Kelly   1974;   Marchi  2009),  along  with  Spanish  folk  Catholicism  and  traditions  (Brandes  1997;  Carmichael  and   Sayer  1992).    Contemporary  Día  de  los  Muertos  celebrations  and  imagery  have  been  linked  to   the   Mexican   cultural   renaissance   and   the   development   of   a   national   identity   that   followed   Mexico’s   1910   revolution   (Brandes   1998a).     More   comprehensive   discussions   regarding   the   origins  and  history  of  Día  de  los  Muertos  outside  the  United  States  is  beyond  the  scope  of  this   paper   and   have   been   engaged   elsewhere   (Brandes   1988,   1997,   2006;   Carmichael   and   Sayer   1992;  Garcíagodoy  1998;  Kelly  1974;  Marchi  2009;  Norget  2006;  Nutini  1988;  Pescador  2013a).        11   Public  Día  de  los  Muertos  celebrations  and  exhibitions  as  we  see  them  today  throughout  the   United   States   can   be   traced   to   the   Chicano/a   civil   rights   movement   of   the   late   1960’s   and   early   1970’s   (Marchi   2009;   Romo   2000).     A   key   component   of   the   U.S.   celebration   is   the   altar   de   muertos   (altar   for   the   dead)   or   ofrenda   (offering),   which   is   a   memorial   space   to   remember   those   who   have   died.   Altars   may   be   constructed   in   a   person’s   home   or   a   public   place.     The   traditional  fashion  of  decorating  an  altar  de  muertos  is  with  pictures  and  representations  of  the   deceased,  bright  colors,  candles,  calaveras  de  azucar  –  ornately  decorated  sugar  skulls,  flowers,   a   crucifix   and/or   other   religious   artifacts.     An   important   aspect   of   the   altar   space   include   renderings  of  La  Catrina  -­‐  the  Mexican  cultural  representation  of  death  who  is  always  smiling,   and   engaged   in   some   type   of   activity;   particularly   an   activity   that   the   deceased   performed   and/or   enjoyed   in   life.     Such   displays   consist   of   altar   installations   and   celebrations   in   classrooms,  community  centers,  museums,  universities,  and  galleries  (Marchi  2009).       While  public  Día  de  los  Muertos  celebrations  honor  and  remember  the  deceased,  they  also   offer   Mexican   migrants   and   their   subsequent   generations   an   opportunity   to   perform   their   ethnicity  and  reaffirm  their  sense  of  identity  (Romo  2000).    Throughout  its  history  the  holiday   has  been  central  to  community  and  individual  identity  development.    Additionally,  Day  of  the   Dead   celebrations   in   the   United   States   serve   as   a   way   to   raise   cultural   awareness,   build   community,   and   express   political   as   well   as   social   commentary   in   an   artistic   fashion.     Even   with   the   freedom   of   artistic   vision   or   “creative   licensing,”   Día   de   los   Muertos   imagery   and   significance   focus   on   the   life   and   times   of   those   who   have   died.     Finally,   Day   of   the   Dead   museum  and  art  gallery  exhibits,  as  well  as  classroom  activities  offer  venues  to  share  Mexican    12   religio-­‐cultural   customs   and   traditions   with   those   who   may   not   be   familiar   (Brandes   2006;   Marchi  2009;  Pescador  2013a).       Public   celebration   of   Día   de   los   Muertos   in   Michigan   has   been   documented   since   the   late   1980s.     Laurie   Kay   Sommers’   book   Fe,   Fiesta   y   Cultura:   Celebrations   of   Faith   and   Culture   in   Detroit’s  Colonia  Mexicana  acknowledges  the  possibility  of  private  in-­‐home  celebrations  among   Mexican   migrants   to   Detroit   since   the   early   1900s,   but   focuses   her   discussion   on   public   celebrations.     Her   research   found   that   early   Mexican   migrants   in   the   Detroit   “Colonia   (neighborhood)”  celebrated  Day  of  the  Dead  in  various  ways  that  consisted  of  cemetery  visits,   small   in-­‐home   altars   and   family   based   practices.     The   Chicano/a   Movement,   its   artists   and   activists,   influenced   the   way   Día   de   los   Muertos   has   been   celebrated   in   Detroit.     The   year   1989   marked   the   first   Day   of   the   Dead   Exhibition   presented   in   a   gallery.     Since   that   first   altar   installation,  Día  de  los  Muertos  celebrations  have  grown  in  popularity  and  been  commissioned   in   neighborhood   galleries   and   community   centers   as   well   as   the   Detroit   Institute   of   Art   (Sommers  1995).       LOCATION  -­‐  In  Michigan,  Mexican  cultural  communities  have  been  present  since  the  early   1900s.     Initially   Mexican   workers   were   attracted   to   the   northern   state   by   the   promise   of   agriculture   and   manufacturing   jobs.     At   the   time   Michigan’s   economy   was   based   in   industrial   agriculture,   automobile   factories,   foundries   and   industry   supporting   companies.     Similar   to   most   industry-­‐based   companies   in   the   country   at   the   time,   those   in   Michigan   used   racially   exclusionary  and  stratified  hiring  practices  reserving  the  dirtiest,  most  difficult  and  dangerous   jobs   for   Mexicans   and   other   racial   ethnic   job   seekers.     Racially   discriminatory   housing   practices    13   also  limited  the  locales  available  for  Mexican  settlement  and  the  growth  of  a  Mexican  cultural   community  in  the  state  (Valdés  1989,  1991).       As  Mexican  communities  grew,  and  were  joined  by  other  Latinos,  the  residents  worked  to   establish   community,   civic,   and   religious   organizations.     Since   the   1950’s   there   have   been   churches   in   mid-­‐Michigan   that   have   served   as   community   centers,   places   of   religious   observance,  and  advocates  for  the  needs  of  long-­‐standing  and  new  Mexican  and  other  Latino/a   community   members.     The   current   research   identified   a   church   that   supports   the   culturally   distinct   expressions   of   faith   by   Mexican   and   other   Latinos.     The   significance   of   such   a   church   should  not  be  overlooked.    Throughout  much  of  the  twentieth  century  the  Catholic  Church,  on   a   national   level,   has   been   involved   in   Americanization   efforts   and   tried   to   suppress   “folk”   religious   celebrations   like   Día   de   los   Muertos   (Martinez,   Ramirez,   and   Horner   2011;   Pescador   2013b).   In   mid-­‐Michigan   city   I   established   three   research   sites   where   I   conducted   observations,   participant   observations   and   interviews.     All   were   public   venues   that   were   referred   to   me   by   community   members   or   leaders.   The   church   and   the   school   had   services   that   focused   on   the   particular   needs   of   the   local   Latino   community.     The   church   had   a   predominantly   Latino   membership.    In  an  interview  with  the  pastor,  he  informed  me  that  approximately  95  percent   of   the   membership   was   Latino/a.     The   majority   of   the   Latinos/as   were   of   Mexican   descent,   followed   by   Puerto   Rican   and   Cuban   membership.     Furthermore,   the   church   was   founded   50   years   ago   to   serve   the   growing   population   of   Latinos/as   in   the   area.     I   conducted   three   site   visits   and   one   interview   at   the   church.     The   school   held   a   monthly   Spanish   language   parent   night   for   parents   from   local   elementary   schools.     These   meetings   typically   consisted   of   a    14   presentation  or  workshop  on  a  designated  topic  of  interest  or  area  of  need  of  the  parents.    All   of  the  participants  that  I  contacted  at  the  school  identified  as  Mexican.    Finally,  a  museum  in   mid-­‐Michigan   hosted   a   Día   de   los   Muertos   altar   exhibit.     There   was   an   opening   ceremony   to   commemorate  the  day  and  welcome  the  public  to  view  the  exhibit.    I  learned  about  the  event   at   the   museum   through   public   advertisements   in   the   form   of   promotional   materials.     The   school  and  church  were  identified  as  viable  research  sites  based  on  their  location,  presence  of   and  service  to  the  local  Latino  community,  as  well  as  the  presence  of  community  members  who   were  willing  to  participate  in  my  research  project  on  Día  de  los  Muertos.   POPULATION  -­‐  The  total  population  of  mid-­‐Michigan  City  is  under  200,000  residents.    The   racial  ethnic  make  up  of  the  city  is  61.2  percent  white,  23.7  percent  Black  or  African  American,   0.8   percent   American   Indian,   and   12.5   percent   Hispanic/Latino.     The   remainder   of   the   population,  according  to  the  U.S.  Census  identified  as  some  other  race  or  more  than  one  race   (U.S.  Census  Bureau  2010).    In  other  words,  87.5  percent  of  the  city’s  population  identified  as   something   other   than   Latino   or   Hispanic.     Of   the   Hispanic/Latino   population,   the   majority   identified   as   Mexican   descent.     People   of   Mexican   descent   consist   of   76.6   percent   of   mid-­‐ Michigan   City’s   Latino/a   population.     They   also   consist   of   almost   10   percent   of   the   total   population   of   mid-­‐Michigan   City.     The   next   largest   Latino   population   groups   are   Puerto   Rican   and  Cuban,  respectively  (U.S.  Census  Bureau  2010).   My  research  population  consisted  of  a  total  of  thirty  participants.  All  research  participants   were   associated   with   a   particular   research   site.     At   the   church   there   were   a   total   of   four   participants;  three  of  who  were  female  and  one  was  male.    The  school  had  a  total  of  twenty-­‐six   participants;   twenty-­‐one   were   female   and   five   were   male.     For   the   total   research   population    15   twenty-­‐four   participants   were   female   and   six   respondents   were   male   (see   Table   1).     The   majority,  twenty-­‐nine,  identified  Mexico  as  their  country  of  origin.    One  participant  stated  that   the  U.S.  was  his  country  of  origin  (See  Table  1).         Church   Table  1:    Gender  and  Place  of  Birth  by  Research  Site  (N=30)   Mexico-­‐Born   Mexico-­‐Born   US  Born   US  Born   Male   Female   Male   Female   0   3   1   0   Total   4   School     5   21   0   0   26   Total   5   24   1   0   30     PARTICIPANT  OBSERVATION  -­‐  My  data  collection  consisted  of  scheduled  short  visits  to  the   research   sites   over   the   course   of   about   a   month’s   time.     The   technique   of   participant   observation   was   used   during   all   aspects   of   the   research.     I   made   observations   of   the   setting,   altar   space,   participants,   and   the   general   atmosphere   to   gather   further   depth   of   understandings  of  the  holiday  and  how  it’s  celebrated.    In  such  field  experiences,  my  identity  as   a   student   from   Michigan   State   University   conducting   research   was   overt.     I   was   an   active   participant  in  the  construction  of  altar  de  muertos  spaces.    Participation  in  the  preparation  for   the   holiday   consisted   of   interaction   and   conversation   with   members   of   the   research   community,  volunteering  time  at  the  research  site  to  assist  with  building  the  altar  de  muertos,   tactile  interaction  with  materials  used  to  construct  the  altar  de  muertos  space,  and  contribution   to  its  aesthetic  decoration.     Data  was  recorded  using  field  notes  and  photographs.    I  carried  a  small  (5x8  inch)  notebook   or   pocket   sized   “memo   book,”   and   made   quick   notes,   designed   to   jog   my   memory   for   the   writing   of   complete   field   notes   after   leaving   the   research   site,   when   perceived   to   be    16   appropriate.     Every   attempt   was   made   to   write   field   notes   immediately   after   exiting   the   research   site   using   either   computer   word   processing   software   or   field   notebook   and   a   handwriting   instrument.     This   was   not   always   possible,   but   field   notes   were   written   no   more   than  five  days  after  the  specific  site  visit  had  taken  place.  I  did  not  use  video  or  audio  recording   equipment   during   observations   or   participant   observations.   Field   notes   from   observations,   participant   observations   and   interviews   served   to   create   a   narrative   to   describe   and   initially   interpret   their   significance   for   the   research   project.     Visuals   in   the   form   of   photographs   provided  more  in-­‐depth  understandings  of  the  public  celebration.    I  obtained  overt  permission   prior   to   photographing   public   spaces   and   the   altar   de   muertos.     Such   photographs   consisted   of   the  altar  and  space  where  the  celebration  took  place.    All  photographs  were  stored  in  a  digital   format  according  to  their  date,  time,  location,  and  coincided  with  field  notes  from  the  site  visit.   INTERVIEWS  -­‐  Group  and  individual  interviews  were  conducted  in  various  formats  including;   directed,   undirected,   informal,   semi-­‐formal,   and   formal.     To   guide   the   formal   directed   interviews,   I   used   a   question   protocol   focusing   on   the   celebration   of   Día   de   Los   Muertos,   understandings  of  the  holiday,  its  significance  to  practitioners,  and  the  influence  of  life  in  the   United   States   on   celebration.     Such   a   formal   structure   was   used   when   appropriate   or   convenient.     However,   in   directed   formal   interviews   the   conversation   did   not   always   follow   the   established   order   of   the   protocol.     A   semi-­‐formal   group   interview   was   conducted   to   identify   possible  research  participants  who  either  participated  in  a  public  Día  de  los  Muertos  celebration   or  observed  the  holiday  in  their  homes.    This  interview  was  arranged  with  a  community  leader   to  be  part  of  a  previously  scheduled  parent  meeting  at  a  local  elementary  school.    While  this   interview   had   a   formal   structure,   it   did   not   follow   the   question   protocol   established   for    17   individual   directed   formal   interviews.   The   goals   were   to   establish   contact   with   possible   respondents   for   an   individual   interview,   and   collect   introductory   data   regarding   Día   de   los   Muertos  in  Mid-­‐Michigan.    Also,  during  the  participant  observations  I  engaged  participants  in  an   undirected   informal   fashion.   Participant   observation   interviews   did   not   have   a   structured   sequence   of   questions,   but   focused   on   celebration   of   Día   de   Los   Muertos,   the   respondents’   reasons   for   participating,   as   well   as   the   holiday’s   significance   to   their   lives.     All   respondents   remained  anonymous  and/or  were  given  pseudonyms.    Any  information  regarding  participant   identity,  as  well  as  all  data  collected  was  kept  confidential  and  guarded  in  a  secure  file  cabinet   and/or  on  a  password  protected  computer.       ANALYSIS   -­‐   Data   analysis   followed   a   grounded   theory   approach,   in   congruence   with   the   extended   case   method.     I   sought   to   uncover   common   themes   in   the   observed   data   and   used   those   themes   to   test   current   theory   or   develop   new   theory   (Burawoy   1998).   I   anticipated   finding  evidence  of  both  public  and  private  Día  de  Los  Muertos  celebrations.    The  data  showed   trends   of   cultural   expression,   as   well   as   aesthetics   associated   with   traditional   and   contemporary   Día   de   los   Muertos   practices.     These   analyses   should   lead   to   some   initial   insights   on   how   the   performance   of   cultural   activities   creates   feelings   of   connectedness   to   a   cultural   heritage.        18   DATA  AND  ANALYSIS   DIA   DE   LOS   MUERTOS   IN   MID-­‐MICHIGAN   -­‐   Through   the   course   of   my   research   I   found   evidence   of   Día   de   los   Muertos   celebrations   in   Mid-­‐Michigan   through   the   building   of   private   and   public   altar   de   muertos.     Francisca,   a   Mid-­‐Michigan   community   member   affiliated   with   the   school,   shared   that   when   she   lived   in   Mexico   her   family   visited   the   cemeteries   where   her   relatives   were   buried.     “We   always   went,   my   mom,   my   dad,   my   brother,   and   an   aunt.     We   always   went   together   .   .   .   to   visit   everybody.     We   brought   them   [the   deceased   relatives]   flowers,   we   cleaned   their   headstones,   and   we   stayed   to   chat   for   a   little   bit,   but   not   too   long   because   they   were   all   in   different   cemeteries,   and   you   have   to   visit   everybody   (Francisca   2011).”     For   Francisca   and   her   family   in   Mexico   it   was   important   to   visit   the   cemetery.     Nevertheless,   at   her   home   in   Mid-­‐Michigan,   Francisca   celebrated   Día   de   Los   Muertos   by   building  an  altar  in  her  living  room.     I   put   up   an   altar   de   muertos   and   we   decorate   it   with   photos   and   things   that   represent  our  relatives  and  friends  who  have  passed  away.    We  cook  the  foods   that   they   liked   to   eat.   We   get   together   .   .   .   in   the   living   room   and   we   eat   the   foods  that  they  liked,  share  stories,  and  what  else?    We  put  candles  and  that’s  it.     In  general,  it’s  just  a  get  together  around  the  altar  (Francisca  2011).   Even  though  Francisca  couldn’t  go  visit  her  relatives  in  the  cemetery  she  still  celebrated   Día  de   Los  Muertos  by  constructing  an  altar  de  muertos  in  her  home.  In  her  case,  building  the  altar  is   another  way  to  celebrate  the  holiday.    It  may  also  serve  as  an  alternative  for  a  person’s  inability   to   visit   the   cemetery   where   their   relatives   are   buried.   Outside   of   my   interview   with   Francisca,   I   was  not  able  to  find  much  evidence  of  private  or  in-­‐home  celebrations.    I  attribute  the  lack  of   evidence  regarding  “in-­‐home”  or  private  celebrations  to  my  lack  of  familiarity  with  the  Mexican   community  here  in  the  Mid-­‐Michigan  area.    19   A   lack   of   familiarity   with   the   research   location   did   not   prohibit   the   identification   of   a   public   Día  de  los  Muertos  celebration  that  takes  place  at  a  church.    The  pastor,  church  staff,  volunteers   and  members  have  been  observing  the  holiday  as  a  part  of  All  Saints’  Day  and  All  Souls’  Day  for   more   than   eight   years   by   building   an   altar   de   muertos   in   the   lobby   of   Mid-­‐Michigan   Church.     The   altar   is   constructed   with   three   levels   representing   life,   death,   and   heaven   and   is   decorated   in  the  traditional  fashion  with  bright  colors,  candles,  calaveras  de  azucar,  flowers,  a  crucifix,  and   representations   of   La   Catrina   (For   visual   representations   of   the   altar   and   church   please   see   photo  1  and  photo  2).         Figure  1:  Photo  1      20   The   building   of   the   altar   de   muertos   is   done   in   conjunction   with   church   services   in   observation  of  All  Saints’  and  All  Souls  Days’.  Pastor  Charles  from  the  Church  explains  how  the   holiday  is  observed  at  the  church:     For   both   of   the   masses   [on   Nov.   1st   and   Nov.   2nd]   we   invite   people   to   bring   pictures  of  their  loved  ones  and  candles  and  then  process  in  with  the  entrance   procession  placing  them  before  the  altar  (in  the  main  church).  The  candles  are  lit   before   they   process   up   and   they’re   up   during   the   opening,   it's   just   a   beautiful   sense   of   the   meaning   of   the   day.   Each   candle   represents   loved   ones.   This   year   we  had  people  put  their  names  (of  the  deceased)  on  the  candles  if  they  wanted   to,  and  the  pictures  of  course,  so  we  had  this  sort  of  very  alive  representation  of   the   living   memory   that   people   had   brought.     Before   and   after   the   celebration   they   are   welcome   to   put   those   pictures   on   the   altar   here   in   the   entrance   area   and   we   keep   them   there   most   of   the   month   of   November   to   continue   that   spirit   through  the  month  (Charles  2011).     The  Michigan  Church  celebration  remembers  and  honors  those  who  have  passed  following  the   church  calendar,  but  does  so  with  an  expression  in  line  with  church  members’  cultural  heritage.     In  our  conversation  Pastor  Charles  clarifies  the  processes  that  are  employed  to  celebrate  Día  de   los   Muertos.     Members   volunteer   to   build   the   altar,   during   the   masses   attendants   bring   photos   of  deceased  loved  ones  and  light  candles  in  memory  of  those  loved  ones;  remembering  loved   ones  who  have  died  is  implied  as  the  focus  of  the  two  days.       Figure  2:  Photo  2    21   Rosario,   a   Mid-­‐Michigan   Church   member,   when   asked   about   Día   de   Los   Muertos   at   the   church,  also  draws  a  connection  between  what  she  remembers  being  done  in  Mexico  with  what   is  currently  practiced  at  the  church.         México   is   a   country   with   many   rich   traditions.     Día   de   los   Muertos   has   always   been  there.    I  don’t  know  how  or  when  it  started,  but  it  has  been  there  for  a  long   time.    In  my  state  [in  México]  we  didn’t  put  up  much  of  an  altar,  maybe  some   flowers   and   pictures   of   our   relatives.     What   we   mainly   did   was   go   to   the   cemetery,   bring   food   and   flowers   and   spend   the   day   there   with   our   relatives   .   .   .   Here  at  the  church  we  set  up  an  altar  and  the  members  bring  pictures  of  their   family  members.    We  put  our  pan  de  muerto,  candles  and  flowers.    We  ask  them   not   to   bring   things   [that   belonged   to   the   deceased   or   were   something   they   enjoyed  while  alive]  because  there  is  not  enough  space  (Rosario  2011).     Similar   to   Francisca,   Rosario   acknowledges   that   what   was   done   in   her   community   of   origin   is   different   from   what   is   typically   done   at   the   Church;   Rosario   recognizes   that   both   methods   fit   within   the   spirit   of   the   holiday   and   the   ways   that   it   is   celebrated.   In   Mexico,   Rosario   and   Francisca  are  more  accustomed  to  visiting  the  cemetery  to  be  in  the  company  of  her  deceased   relatives.     While   the   building   of   an   altar   may   be   part   of   the   celebration   in   some   places,   it   is   not   present  in  others.    For  Rosario,  it  seems  that  attending  church  on  November  first  and  second,   and   the   altar   de   muertos   in   the   lobby   fills   the   role   of   visiting   the   cemetery.   Mid-­‐Michigan   Church  is  her  place  to  go  on  Día  de  los  Muertos  to  remember  the  life  and  honor  the  legacy  of   family  members  who  have  passed  away.     Moreover,   in   Michigan   I   found   evidence   of   a   public   Día   de   los   Muertos   celebration   at   a   church  that  serves  a  predominantly  Latino  membership,  and  a  celebration  that  takes  place  in   someone’s   home.   The   meaning   or   purpose   of   the   holiday,   celebrating   the   life   and   legacy   of   deceased  relatives  and  loved  ones,  remains  the  same  but  the  action  has  changed.    Instead  of   going  to  the  cemetery  as  Rosario  and  Francisca  are  accustomed  to  in  Mexico,  the  building  of  an    22   altar  de  muertos  and/or  attendance  of  a  special  church  service  that  incorporates  aspects  of  Día   de  los  Muertos  serves  as  a  way  to  continue  a  cultural  and  religious  practice.    The  situation  of   living  in  the  United  States  makes  it  impossible,  or  at  least  very  difficult,  for  them  to  travel  to  the   cemeteries   where   their   relatives   are   buried.     As   a   result   these   respondents   modified   their   cultural  practices  to  meet  their  needs  in  Mid-­‐Michigan.   OBSTACLES  TO  CELEBRATION  -­‐  Life  in  the  United  States  is  different  than  life  in  Mexico.    Even   though  there  are  similar  demands  like  going  to  work  and  daily  chores,  a  person  is  in  constant   contact   with   behavioral   and   material   culture   that   affirms   a   Mexican   identity.     In   Mexico,   a   person  would  need  to  make  a  conscious  decision  and  effort  to  not  celebrate  Día  de  los  Muertos.     In   the   United   States   the   opposite   is   the   case.     Pastor   Charles   clarifies   that   in   a   U.S.   context   holidays  such  as  Día  de  los  Muertos  are  not  structured  into  daily  life.  Mexicans  in  Mid-­‐Michigan   need  to  make  a  conscious  effort  to  celebrate  the  holiday,  as  well  as  celebrate  it  in  a  fashion  that   does  not  conflict  with  life  in  the  United  States  and  Mid-­‐Michigan.        People   .   .   .   come   here   and   work   doesn't   stop   when   you   have   these   big   celebrations   or   big   feast   days.     If   they   got   a   job   and   have   to   be   at   work,   they   have   to   be   at   work.     Unless   they   get   to   take   special   time   for   something   like   that,   but   that's   one   step   more,   one   hurdle   more   to   go   through,   or   just   the   fact   that   people  find  that  they  have  all  these  choices  now  .  .  .  The  whole  shift  when  you   come   from   one   culture   and   enter   into   another   culture,   it   totally   disrupts   your   world  in  so  many  ways.    To  make  that  transition  and  shift,  you  don't  just  take  for   granted   all   these   things   that   you're   going   to   celebrate   and   suddenly   you   have   to   consciously   choose   to   do   it   or   to   not   do   it.     Sometimes   you're   just   tired   and   maybe  sometimes  you're  just  wrestling  to  make  this  new  beginning  and  survive,   so  stuff  can  tend  to,  sort  of  fall  by  the  wayside  in  the  midst  of  all  that  (Charles   2011).     The   process   of   migration   and   re-­‐establishing   one’s   self   in   a   new   society   is   inherently   challenging.    Cultural  activities  that  may  have  seemed  to  happen  “naturally”  in  the  country  of   origin  are  not  structured  into  daily  life  of  the  host  society  and  now  require  a  conscious  effort    23   and   may   conflict   with   the   demands   of   life   in   the   United   States.     There   may   also   be   social   pressure  to  discontinue  cultural  activities.  This  is  in  addition  to  the  fear  or  anxiety  of  living  in   another  country  and  culture  (Sommers  1995).    A  goal  that  Pastor  Charles  has  for  the  church  is   to   offer   people   a   sense   of   familiarity   or   place   in   a   new   context.     Participation   in   a   public   celebration   offers   the   opportunity   to   build   a   sense   of   connection   to,   or   facilitate   integration   with,   the   local   Mexican   descendant   community.     However,   the   celebration   of   Día   de   los   Muertos  is  carried  out  in  a  manner  that  does  not  necessarily  conflict  with  daily  life  in  the  United   States  of  America.       Francisca   shares   some   of   her   experiences   and   believes   that   it   is   easier   to   “lose”   traditions   if   there  is  limited  contact  with  a  Mexican  cultural  community.     It’s  easy  to  get  wrapped  up  in  the  everyday  things,  and  you  know,  life  happens   and  you  can  get  lost  in  going  to  work,  coming  home  and  making  dinner,  picking   up  the  bedroom,  washing  dishes  and  all  that.    Then  it’s  the  same  the  next  day;   then   it’s   the   weekend   and   you   have   to   wash   clothes   and   things   like   that.     So,   it’s   very   easy   to   lose   yourself   in   that   .   .   .   In   Mexico   it’s   easier   to   remember   that   you’re  Mexican  .  .  .  here  it’s  more  difficult  to  be  in  contact  with  all  that,  obviously   because  it’s  very  easy  to  ‘Americanize,’  I  think.    For  me,  it  is  easy  to  lose  these   traditions  simply  by  living  here.    You  forget  .  .  .  just  from  being  far  way,  and  more   so   if   you   don’t   have   much   contact   [with   Mexico   or   a   Mexican   community]   (Francisca  2011).     It   is   not   easy   for   Mexican   migrants   to   “maintain”   their   cultural   practices   given   the   different   context  where  Mexican  immigrants  find  themselves.    Life  in  the  United  States  is  different,  the   language,   the   customs,   the   culture,   and   daily   life   are   different   and   presents   its   own   set   of   challenges  to  celebrating  cultural  holidays  like  Día  de  Los  Muertos.   A   particular   challenge   is   that   some   aspects   of   Day   of   the   Dead   celebrations   cannot   be   reproduced   in   the   new   social   context   of   Michigan.     In   my   group   interview   with   the   School   Parents   l   learned   that   for   some   Mexican   migrants,   no   longer   being   able   to   visit   the   cemetery    24   was   an   insurmountable   obstacle   to   the   celebration   of   Día   de   los   Muertos.     My   field   notes   provide  an  account  of  our  conversation:   At  the  event,  Martha  introduced  me  at  the  very  beginning  and  again  just  before   my  “presentation.”    I  said  hello,  reintroduced  myself,  told  them  I  was  a  doctoral   student   at   Michigan   State   University,   and   that   I   was   conducting   a   research   project   on   Día   de   Los   Muertos   here   in   Lansing.     I   told   them   about   my   experience   at  the  grocery  store  with  the  pan  de  muerto,  discussed  confidentiality,  asked  if  I   could   ask   them   some   questions   about   Día   de   los   Muertos,   and   told   them   I   had   a   sign-­‐up   if   they   were   interested   in   participating   in   an   interview.     I   asked   the   parents   where   they   were   from;   all   indicated   they   were   from   Mexico.     I   then   asked   if   they   celebrated   Día   de   Los   Muertos   here   in   Lansing.     All   parents   present   responded  verbally  or  non-­‐verbally  that  they  did  not  celebrate  the  holiday  here   in   Lansing.     Martha   interjected   questions   surrounding   specific   things   that   people   might  do  in  observation  of  the  holiday,  to  each  question  the  parents  answered   negatively.    I  followed  up  by  asking  “Is  there  any  particular  reason  why  you  do   not   celebrate   Día   de   Los   Muertos?”     One   father   responded   in   a   matter   of   fact   way,   “Porque   aqui   no   tenemos   muertos   -­‐   Because   we   don’t   have   any   dead   here.”     His   answer   was   confirmed   by   the   majority   of   other   parents   who   were   present   either   with   words   or   gestures.     One   of   the   mothers   added   that   the   principle   piece   of   the   holiday   was   going   to   the   cemetery,   emphasizing   that   if   there   were   no   ‘muertos   -­‐   dead‘   or   you   couldn’t   go   to   ‘los   muertos’   then   there   was  not  a  reason  to  celebrate  Día  de  Los  Muertos.       -­‐  Fieldnotes  from  10/25/2011         The   School   Parents   clearly   stated   that   they   do   not   celebrate   Día   de   los   Muertos   in   Mid-­‐ Michigan.     Especially   significant   in   the   responses   of   non-­‐celebration   is   the   reasoning   behind   why  Día  de  los  Muertos  is  not  celebrated.  The  School  Parents  don’t  have  any  dead  here  in  Mid-­‐ Michigan.  The  way  that  the  School  Parents  understood  celebration  of  Día  de  los  Muertos  is  by   going   to   the   cemetery.     It   is   in   the   cemetery,   where   the   remains   of   deceased   relatives   are   located,  where  the  holiday  transpires.    This  is  consistent  with  findings  from  other  research  on   Day  of  the  Dead  in  Mexico  (Brandes  1988;  Garcíagodoy  1998;  Marchi  2009;  Norget  2006).    The   School  Parents  and  I  did  not  discuss  what  activities  took  place  in  the  hometown  cemeteries  in   Mexico  during  Día  de  los  Muertos.    Their  orientation  to  the  activities  involved  in  the  celebration    25   could  be  evidence  of  regional  particularities.  That  possibility  aside,  the  School  Parents  made  it   clear  that  it  was  the  visit  to  the  “muertos”  (deceased  family  members)  that  was  important.    Not   being  able  to  visit  your  muertos  was  reason  enough  to  not  celebrate.   CULTURAL  HERITAGE  IN  A  NEW  PLACE  -­‐  Día  de  los  Muertos  in  the  United  States  serves  the   need  to  remember  and  venerate  deceased  family  members  and  loved  ones.  Celebrants  do  so   by   building   altars   in   their   homes,   volunteering   to   build   one   at   their   church,   and   attending/participating  in  a  special  mass  with  processes  specific  for  the  celebration  of  Día  de  los   Muertos.    For  the  participants  in  this  study  Día  de  los  Muertos  festivities  offer  an  opportunity  to   commemorate  family  members  who  have  died.    The  continued  practice  of  Day  of  the  Dead  also   facilitates   a   sense   of   connection   with   a   cultural   heritage   and   homeland.     Participation   in   a   public   gathering   with   other   celebrants   can   also   enhance   integration   to   a   new   community.     Francisca,   in   response   to   my   questions   about   why   she   continues   to   celebrate   Día   de   los   Muertos   and   what   makes   the   celebration   important   to   her,   discusses   her   need/desire   to   feel   connected  to  her  cultural  heritage.     For  me,  the  fact  that  I  am  far  from  home,  obviously  sometimes  you  feel  very  far   from   your   customs,   your   traditions,   your   culture,   and   I   think   it’s   easy,   with   all   that  happens  in  everyday  life,  to  separate  from  or  forget  who  you  are.    For  me   being  Mexican  forms,  well  it’s  everything  for  me,  I’m  Mexican,  that’s  who  I  am.     So  the  fact  of  doing  this,  I  think  it  helps  me  not  to  forget,  but  be  more  connected   with  who  I  am  and  with  my  culture  (Francisca  2011).     Being   far   away   from   home   and   the   culture   in   which   she   grew   up   in   addition   to   navigating   everyday  life  in  the  United  States,  Francisca  feels  disconnected  from  being  Mexican  and  herself.     Día  de  los  Muertos  offers  her  a  way  to  “maintain”  a  sense  of  her  identity  as  a  Mexican.    It  is  a   particular   day   and   activity   that   connects   her   with   deceased   family   members   and   reinforces   a   connection   with   her   cultural   heritage   and   identity.     Celebration   of   the   holiday   is   part   of   her    26   psychological   work   that   reinforces   her   positive   sense   of   self   as   a   part   of   the   social   category,   ethnic  group,  of  Mexican.     In  addition  to  the  connection  with  a  cultural  heritage  and  a  sense  of  self,  Día  de  Los  Muertos   celebrations   are   viewed   as   a   way   to   foster   a   connection   with   a   new   community   here   in   Mid-­‐ Michigan  by  way  of  familiar  traditions.       Some   people   here   are   fairly   newly   arrived;   you   have   first   generation,   second,   third  and  fourth  generation.    I  think  that  the  ones  that  are  closer  to  Mexico  [they   themselves   or   their   parents   migrated],   especially   the   ones   who   came   from   Mexico   and   maybe   grew   up   in   Mexico   and   came   here,   came   here   at   some   point,   really  have  that  experience  there  [of  celebrating  DDLM],  so  [we're]  trying  to  help   them   .   .   .   make   connections,   trying   to   help   them   have   these   touchstones   with   what  they’re  familiar  with,  and  sharing  it  with  everybody  else  (Charles  2011).   Here  Pastor  Charles  acknowledges  that  while  Día  de  los  Muertos  at  the  church  is  intended  to   commemorate   deceased   relatives   in   line   with   traditional   cultural   and   religious   practices,   the   formal   public   celebration   provides   an   opportunity   for   people   to   connect   with   a   co-­‐ethnic   community   and   participate   in   psychological   work   that   reinforces   their   sense   of   self.     Contact   with   a   community   that   also   celebrates   cultural   holidays   can   facilitate   celebration,   a   sense   of   connection  to  a  cultural  heritage,  and  integration  with  a  new  community.        27   SUMMARY  COMMENTS     The   present   research   found   that   Día   de   los   Muertos   celebrations   are   present   in   Mid-­‐ Michigan.     The   empirical   evidence   suggests   public   and   domestic   celebrations   of   the   holiday   are   taking   place   in   Mid-­‐Michigan   City.     This   paper   presented   evidence   of   such   celebrations   that   took   place   at   a   local   church   and   in   a   respondent’s   home   in   a   mid-­‐size   Michigan   city.     Respondents   also   indicated   that   they   did   not   participate   in   public   celebrations   nor   celebrate   Day  of  the  Dead  privately.    Their  lack  of  activity  regarding  Día  de  los  Muertos  celebration  by  the   School   Parents   does   not  necessarily   indicate   a   loss   of   ethnic   identity.     The   celebration   of  Día   de   los   Muertos   is   not   a   litmus   test   for   who   has   reproduced   cultural   activities   to   affirm   an   ethnic   identity   and   who   has   not.     Instead,   Día   de   los   Muertos   serves   as   but   one   of   many   ways   that   Mexican  migrants  may  engage  in  psychological  work  to  affirm  their  identity  as  Mexican  in  the   United  States  of  America.    My  interview  with  School  Parents  was  conducted  entirely  in  Spanish.     Language   is   a   strong   marker   for   ethnic   and   social   identity   (Hurtado   et   al.   1994;   Nagel   1994).     Additionally,   there   exist   many   factors   that   may   influence   celebration   or   non-­‐celebration   of   a   particular   holiday   or   reproducing   culture   in   a   specific   manner.     Certainly   time   in   country,   connection   with   a   local   Mexican   community   that   celebrate,   access   to   resources,   and   experiences  of  marginalization  are  social  factors  that  could  have  an  effect  on  how  ethnic  groups   reproduce   culture   in   new   social   spaces   and   contexts.     Future   research   could   explore   the   salience  of  these  factors  on  the  celebration  of  Día  de  los  Muertos.     For   the   respondents   who   did   celebrate   Día   de   los   Muertos,   the   holiday   served   multiple   purposes.    First  and  foremost  the  holiday  was  a  time  to  honor  and  remember  deceased  family   members   and   loved   ones.     Their   participation   in   Day   of   the   Dead   celebration   activities;    28   attending   church   service,   building   an   altar,   and/or   preparing   special   meals   also   affirms   their   identity   as   Mexican   as   well   as   a   connection   to   a   cultural   heritage   and   homeland.     These   participants’  celebration  of  Día  de  los  Muertos  demonstrates  one  way  that  cultural  practices  are   reproduced   in   new   social   contexts.     Continued   research   here   would   consist   of   extended   case   study  at  the  church  and  with  church  members  to  gain  deeper  understandings  of  the  significance   of  Día  de  los  Muertos  to  participants’  lives.       The   in-­‐home   and   public   celebrations   offer   an   opportunity   for   respondents   to   express   religious   faith   and   cultural   values   in   a   way   that   does   not   necessarily   conflict   with   life   in   the   United   States   and   connects   practitioners   with   a   cultural   heritage   that   reaffirms   their   identity.   Día   de   los   Muertos,   for   participants   in   this   study,   maintains   its   original   significance   of   paying   respect   to   and   remembering   deceased   relatives   while   also   serving   as   a   symbol   of   Mexican   cultural   heritage   that   affirms   an   ethnic   identity   as   Mexican.     The   behaviors   associated   with   Day   of  the  Dead  and  the  celebration  as  a  whole  could  also  support  social  identity’s  assertion  that   people  engage  in  “psychological  work”  to  affirm  a  positive  sense  of  self  when  in  a  situation  of   social   comparison.     Día   de   los   Muertos   celebrations   could   also   offer   those   who   identify   as   Mexican  a  safe  space  to  perform  their  ethnicity.    As  alluded  to  in  the  earlier  discussion  of  social   identity  theory,  in  the  social  context  of  United  States  of  America,  Mexicans  are  racialized  and   marginalized   within   U.S.   racial   hierarchy.     Day   of   the   Dead   as   a   site   of   psychological   work   appears   to   proactively   challenge   the   internalization   of   a   racialized   and   marginalized   identity.     The   holiday   serves   the   function   of   remembering   deceased   relatives   and   takes   on   secondary   function  of  connecting  people  with  their  cultural  heritage  reaffirming  a  positive  identity.        29     Celebration  of  Día  de  los  Muertos  is  a  theoretically  salient  social  phenomenon  to  the  study   of   cultural   reproduction   and   identity   construction   among   Mexicans,   and   potentially   other   Latinos/as,  living  in  the  social  context  of  the  United  States  of  America.    Future  research  should   engage  the  relationship  between  migrant  cultural  reproduction  and  gender.    The  vast  majority   of  people  involved  in  the  study  and  Día  de  los  Muertos  activities  were  women.    This  was  not  an   anticipated  finding.    Future  research  should  engage  the  question;  what  role  does  gender  play  in   cultural  reproduction?  New  work  in  this  area  should  definitely  investigate  the  impact  of  such  a   relationship   to   identity   construction   of   Mexican   migrants.     Such   questions   could   be   further   expanded   beyond   the   immigrant   generation   to   include   the   larger   U.S.   Chicano/Latino   community.    The  study  of  Día  de  los  Muertos  in  the  United  States  of  America  is  an  area  where   much  research  and  many  rich  discussions  can  be  had.            30                                                                                         BIBLIOGRAPHY    31   BIBLIOGRAPHY         Alba,  Richard.  1999.  “Immigration  and  the  American  Realities  of  Assimilation  and   Multiculturalism.”  Sociological  Forum  14:3–25.   Benjamin-­‐Alvarado,  Jonathan,  Louis  DeSipio,  and  Celeste  Montoya.  2009.  “Latino  Mobilization   in  New  Immigrant  Destinations  The  Anti—HR  4437  Protest  in  Nebraska’s  Cities.”  Urban   Affairs  Review  44(5):718–35.   Berg,  Bruce  L.  2009.  Qualitative  Research  Methods  for  the  Social  Sciences.  7th  ed.  Boston,  MA:   Allyn  &  Bacon.   Berger,  Peter  L.  and  Thomas  Luckmann.  1967.  The  Social  Construction  of  Reality:    A  Treatise  in   the  Sociology  of  Knowledge.  New  York,  NY:  Anchor  Books.   Bernosky  de  Flores,  C.  H.  2010.  “A  Conceptual  Framework  for  the  Study  of  Social  Capital  in  New   Destination  Immigrant  Communities.”  Journal  of  Transcultural  Nursing  21(3):205–11.   Brandes,  S.  1997.  “Sugar,  Colonialism,  and  Death:  On  the  Origins  of  Mexico’s  Day  of  the  Dead.”   Comparative  studies  in  society  and  history  39(2):270–99.   Brandes,  S.  1998a.  “Iconography  in  Mexico’s  Day  of  the  Dead:  Origins  and  Meaning.”   Ethnohistory  45(2):181–218.   Brandes,  S.  1998b.  “The  Day  of  the  Dead,  Halloween,  and  the  Quest  for  Mexican  National   Identity.”  Journal  of  American  Folklore  111(442):359–80.   Brandes,  Stanley.  1988.  Power  and  Persuasion:  Fiestas  and  Social  Control  in  Rural  Mexico.   Philadelphia,  PA:  University  of  Pennsylvania  Press.   Brandes,  Stanley.  2006.  Skulls  to  the  Living,  Bread  to  the  Dead.  Malden,  MA:  Blackwell   Publishing.   Burawoy,  Michael.  1998.  “The  Extended  Case  Method.”  Sociological  Theory  16:4–33.   Cadaval,  Olivia.  1985.  “‘The  Taking  of  the  Renwick’:    The  Celebration  of  the  Day  of  the  Dead  and   the  Latino  Community  in  Washington,  D.  C.”  Journal  of  Folklore  Research  22(2/3):179– 93.   Cadge,  W.,  S.  Curran,  B.  N.  Jaworsky,  and  P.  Levitt.  2010.  “The  City  as  Context:  Culture  and  Scale   in  New  Immigrant  Destinations.”  Amérique  Latine  Histoire  et  Mémoire.  Les  Cahiers   ALHIM  (20).  Retrieved  January  5,  2013  (http://alhim.revues.org/index3640.html).      32   Cadge,  Wendy,  Sara  Curran,  B.  Nadya  Jaworsky,  Peggy  Levitt,  and  Jessica  Hejtmanek.  2008.   “The  City  as  Context:    Spaces  of  Reception  in  New  Immigrant  Destinations.”  Boston,  MA.   Retrieved  April  4,  2013   (http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=The+City+as+Context%3A+Spaces+of+Reception+ in+New+Immigrant+Destinations&hl=en&btnG=Search&lr=lang_en|lang_es&as_sdt=80 000001&as_sdtp=on.).   Carmichael,  Elizabeth  and  Chloë  Sayer.  1992.  The  Skeleton  at  the  Feast:  The  Day  of  The  Dead  in   Mexico.  Austin,  TX:  University  of  Texas  Press.   Charles.  2011.  Interview  with  Author.  Formal  Structured  Interview.  Mid-­‐Michigan  City,   November.   Dodson,  Jualynne  E.  2012.  “Qualitative  Field  Research  -­‐  Methods  &  Theory:  The  African  Atlantic   Research  Team  Reports.”  METHOD(E)S  African  Review  of  Social  Sciences   Methodology/Revue  africaine  de  méthodologie  des  sciences  sociales,  Journal  of  the   Council  for  Development  of  Social  Science  Research  in  Africa.   Dodson,  Jualynne  and  Susan  Ross.  1977.  Afro-­‐American  Culture:  Expressive  Behaviors.  Atlanta,   GA:  Atlanta  University  School  of  Social  Work.   Fischer,  M.  J.  2010.  “Immigrant  Educational  Outcomes  in  New  Destinations:  An  Exploration  of   High  School  Attrition.”  Social  Science  Research  39(4):627–41.   Francisca.  2011.  Interview  with  Author.  Formal  Structured  Interview.  Mid-­‐Michigan  City,   October.   Gans,  Herbert.  1979.  “Symbolic  Ethnicity:    The  Future  of  Ethnic  Groups  and  Cultutres  in   America.”  Ethnic  and  Racial  Studies  2:1–20.   Garcíagodoy,  Juanita.  1998.  Digging  Days  of  the  Dead:  A  Reading  of  México’s  Días  de  Muertos.   Niwot,  CO:  University  Press  of  Colorado.   Golash-­‐Boza,  Tanya.  2006.  “Dropping  the  Hyphen?    Becoming  Latino(a)-­‐American  through   Racialized  Assimilation.”  Social  Forces  85:27–55.   Hurtado,  A.,  A.  Gurin,  and  T.  Peng.  1994.  “Social  Identities:  A  Framework  for  Studying  the   Adaptations  of  Immigrants  and  Ethnics:  The  Adaptations  of  Mexicans  in  the  United   States.”  Social  Problems  41:129–51.   Kandel,  W.  and  E.  A.  Parrado.  2005.  “Restructuring  of  the  US  Meat  Processing  Industry  and  New   Hispanic  Migrant  Destinations.”  Population  and  Development  Review  31(3):447–71.   Kasinitz,  Philip,  John  Mollenkopf,  and  Mary  C.  Waters.  2002.  “Becoming  American/Becoming   New  Yorkers:  Immigrant  Incorporation  in  a  Majority  Minority  City.”  International   Migration  Review  36:1020–36.    33   Kelly,  Patricia  Fernandez.  1974.  “Death  in  Mexican  Folk  Culture.”  American  Quarterly  26(5):516.   Lee,  Everett  S.  1966.  “A  Theory  of  Migration.”  Demography  3(1):47.   Lichter,  Daniel  T.  2012.  “Immigration  and  the  New  Racial  Diversity  in  Rural  America.”  Rural   Sociology  77(1):3–35.   Lichter,  D.  T.,  D.  Parisi,  M.  C.  Taquino,  and  S.  M.  Grice.  2010.  “Residential  Segregation  in  New   Hispanic  Destinations:  Cities,  Suburbs,  and  Rural  Communities  Compared.”  Social   Science  Research  39(2):215–30.   Lopez,  Nancy.  2003.  “Disentangling  Race-­‐Gender  Work  Experiences:  Second-­‐Generation   Caribbean  Young  Adults  in  New  York  City.”  in  Gender  and  U.S.  Immigration:   Contemporary  Trends,  edited  by  Pierrette  Hondagneu-­‐Sotelo.  Berkeley,  CA:  University  of   California  Press.   Marchi,  Regina.  2013.  “Hybrity  and  Authenticity  in  US  Day  of  the  Dead  Celebrations.”  Journal  of   American  Folklore  126(501):272–301.   Marchi,  Regina  M.  2009.  Day  of  The  Dead  in  the  USA:  The  Migration  and  Transformation  of  a   Cultural  Phenomenon.  New  Brunswick,  NJ:  Rutgers  University  Press.   Marrow,  H.  B.  2005.  “New  Destinations  and  Immigrant  Incorporation.”  Perspectives  on  Politics   3(4):781.   Martinez,  Rubén  O.,  Evangelina  Palma  Ramirez,  and  Pilar  Horner.  2011.  A  Brief  History  of  Cristo   Rey  Church  in  Lansing,  MI.  Lansing,  MI:  Bradford  Printing.   Massey,  Douglas  S.  2008.  New  Faces  in  New  Places:  The  Changing  Geography  of  American   Immigration.  Russell  Sage  Foundation.   Mintz,  Sidney  W.  and  Richard  Price.  1992.  The  Birth  of  African-­‐American  Culture:  An   Anthropological  Perspectve.  Boston,  MA:  Beacon.   Nagel,  Joane.  1994.  “Constructing  Ethnicity:  Creating  and  Recreating  Ethnic  Identity  and   Culture.”  Social  Problems  41(1):152–76.   Norget,  Kristin.  2006.  Days  of  Death,  Days  of  Life:  Ritual  in  the  Popular  Culture  of  Oaxaca.  New   York,  NY:  Columbia  University  Press.   Nutini,  Hugo  G.  1988.  Todos  Santos  in  Rural  Tlaxcala:  A  Syncretic,  Expressive,  and  Symbolic   Analysis  of  the  Cult  of  the  Dead.  Princeton,  NJ:  Princeton  University  Press.   Park,  Robert  E.  1928.  “Human  Migration  and  the  Marginal  Man.”  American  Journal  of  Sociology   33(6):881–93.    34   Pescador,  Juan  Javier.  2013a.  “History:  Day  of  the  Dead.”  Pescador  Arte  Ofrendas.  Retrieved   October  15,  2013  (pescadorarteofrendas.wordpress.com).   Pescador,  Juan  Javier.  2013b.  Interview  by  Author.  Personal  Correspondence.  Mid-­‐Michigan   City,  October.     Pfeffer,  M.  J.  and  P.  A.  Parra.  2008.  “Community  Response  to  Immigrants  in  New  Destinations.”   Washington,  DC.   Portes,  Alejandro  and  Men  Zhou.  1993.  “The  New  Scond  Generation:  Segmented  Assimilation   and  Its  Variants.”  Annals  of  the  American  Academy  of  Political  and  Social  Science   530:74–96.   Romo,  Tere.  2000.  Chicanos  En  Mictlán:  Dia  De  Los  Muertos  In  California.  San  Francisco,  CA:  The   Mexican  Museum.   Rosario.  2011.  Interview  by  Author.  Informal  Unstructured  Interview.  Mid-­‐Michigan  City,   October.     Sáenz,  Rogelio.  2012.  “Rural  Race  and  Ethnicity.”  Pp.  207–23  in  International  Handbook  of  Rural   Demography,  vol.  3,  International  Handbooks  of  Population.  Springer  Science+Business   Media.   Sommers,  Laurie  Kay.  1995.  Fiesta,  Fe,  Y  Cultura:  Celebrations  of  Faith  and  Culture  in  Detroit’s   Colonia  Mexicana.  Detroit,  MI:  Casa  de  Unidad  Cultural  Arts  &  Media  Center.   Stepick,  Alex  and  Carol  Dutton  Stepick.  2010.  “The  Complexities  and  Confusions  of  Segmented   Assimilation.”  Ethnic  and  Racial  Studies  33:1149–67.   Swidler,  Ann.  1986.  “Culture  in  Action:  Symbols  and  Strategies.”  American  Sociological  Review   51(2):274–86.   U.S.  Census  Bureau.  2010.  Race  and  Hispanic  or  Latino  Origin  -­‐  2010  Census  Summary  File  1,   Tables  P5,  P8,  PCT4,  PCT5,  PCT8,  and  PCT11.   Valdés,  Dennis  N.  1989.  “BETABELEROS:    The  Formation  of  an  Agricultural  Proletariat  in  the   Midwest,  1897-­‐1930.”  Labor  History  30:536–62.   Valdés,  Dennis  N.  1991.  Al  Norte:  Agricultural  Workers  in  the  Great  Lakes  Region,  1917-­‐1970.   Austin,  TX:  University  of  Texas  Press.   Williams,  Raymond.  1981.  The  Sociology  of  Culture.  Chicago,  IL:  The  University  of  Chicago  Press.        35