LIBRARY Michigan State University PLACE IN RETURN BOX to remove this checkout from your rocord. TO AVOID FINES rotum on or More data duo. DATE DUE DATE DUE DATE DUE AUG 3 0 20 MSU I: An Affirmative ActioNEquai Oppoflunity Ila-mulch Wan-9.1 THE FUNCTION AND EXPRESSION OF THE VER -1 GENE AND LOCALIZATION OF THE VER—l PROTEIN INVOLVED IN AFLATOXIN Bl BIOSYNTHESIS IN ASPERGHL US PARASITICUS By Shun-Hsin Liang A DIS SERTATION Submitted to Michigan State University in partial fulfillment Of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Department of Food Science and Human Nutrition 1996 ABSTRACT THE FUNCTION AND EXPRESSION OF THE VER -1 GENE AND LOCALIZATION OF THE VER—l PROTEIN INVOLVED IN AFLATOXIN Bl BIO SYNTHESIS IN ASPERGILL US PARASITICUS By Shun-Hsin Liang The ultimate goal of the present research is the elimination of preharvest aflatoxin contamination. One approach to accomplish this goal is to develop an understanding of the molecular mechanisms regulating aflatoxin biosynthesis in toxigenic aspergilli. This study focused on the ver-I gene associated with the aflatoxin biosynthetic pathway. This gene was cloned and its nucleotide sequence was determined as part of a previous study on aflatoxin B1 (AFBI) biosynthesis in Aspergillus parasiticus NRRL 5862. Two copies of the ver-I gene, ver-IA and ver-IB, were tentatively identified in this fimgal Strain by Southern hybridization analysis. Genetic complementation and nucleotide sequence data suggested that the ver-I gene is involved in the conversion of versicolorin A (VA) to sterigmatocystin (ST). To clearly establish the fiinction of the ver—I gene, I proposed to test three hypotheses: (1) the ver-I gene encodes a protein which has enzymatic activity associated with the conversion of VA to ST; (2) the pattern of Ver-l protein accumulation parallels AFB 1 synthesis; and (3) the Ver-l protein is closely associated with other proteins involved in AFBl biosynthesis allowing the pathway to function in an efficient way. To address these hypotheses, studies were designed to achieve the following specific aims : ( 1) identify ver-I gene function by nucleotide sequence and gene disruption analyses; (2) identify the accumulation pattern of the Ver-l protein in fungal cells grown in liquid or solid media; and (3) identify the intracellular location of the Ver-l protein. In specific aim 1, the methods consisted of gene disruption and nucleotide sequence analysis. The methods used in specific aim 2 included generation of polyclonal antibodies against the Ver-l protein, batch fermentation analysis, nutritional shift assay, and analysis of ver-I promoter activity using the GUS reporter strain. In specific aim 3, the subcellular localization of the Ver-l protein was performed by difi‘erential centrifugation and immunofluorescence microscopy. The major findings of this research are : (1) ver-IA but not ver-IB is directly involved in aflatoxin biosynthesis; (2) the timing of Ver-l protein accumulation is positively correlated to aflatoxin accumulation; (3) expression of the ver-I gene in a fungal colony is subject to temporal and Spatial regulation; (4) although the ver-I gene is expressed in both vegetative hyphae and conidiophores, there is significantly more Ver-l protein in the structures involved in asexual reproduction; and (5) the Ver-l protein appears to be located in or tightly bound to a membrane-bound organelle in fimgal cells. To my parents, brother, and lovely wife, Lie-Ken iv ACKNOWLEDGMENTS First of all, my deep gratitude is to my advisor, Dr. John E. Linz. This dissertation would not have been possible without his superior instruction and guidance. I feel very lucky to be his student. I also am extremely grateful to my guidance committee members, Dr. William G. Helferich, Dr. James J. Pestka, and Dr. C. A. Reddy, whose expertise has broadened my knowledge and makes this dissertation truly unique. Finally, I would like to thank the following people in my laboratory for their generous and professional help in my work: Dr. Frances Trail, Dr. Ninee Mahanti, Dr. Tzong-Shoon Wu, Dr. Ludmila Rose, Matt Rarick, Michael Miller, David Wilson, and Renqing Zhou. I love you all. TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES ................................................... ix LIST OF FIGURES .................................................... x INTRODUCTION AND RESEARCH RATIONALE .......................... 1 CHAPTER 1 LITERATURE REVIEW ............................................... 3 1. Natural occurrence of aflatoxins ........................................ 3 II. The aflatoxin problem ............................................... 6 A. Aflatoxins and public health ...................................... 6 B. Aflatoxins and economic losses .................................. 10 111. Control of aflatoxins ............................................... 12 A. Prevention .................................................. 12 B. Decontamination or detoxification ................................ 13 1. Removal of aflatoxins .................................... 13 (a) Physical separation ............................... 13 (b) Chemical separation .............................. 14 2. Degradation or detoxification .............................. 14 (a) Physical methods ................................. 14 (b) Chemical methods ................................ 15 (c) Biological methods ............................... 16 C. Reduction of aflatoxin bioavailability .............................. 16 1. Selective chemisorption .................................. 16 2. Chemoprotection against aflatoxin toxicity .................... 17 IV. Biosynthesis of aflatoxins ............................................ 17 A. Chemical and biochemical aspects ................................ 17 B. Genetic and molecular aspects ................................... 20 1. Classical genetic analysis ................................. 20 2. Molecular genetics ...................................... 21 V. Regulation of aflatoxin biosynthesis .................................... 24 vi CHAPTER 2 STRUCTURAL AND FUNCTIONAL CHARACTERIZATION OF THE PER-1 GENE ................................................ 27 I. Introduction ...................................................... 27 11. Materials and methods .............................................. 30 A. Strains and plasmids .......................................... 30 B. Bacterial cell transformation and plasmid purification .................. 31 C. Transformation of fungal protoplasts .............................. 34 D. Preparation and analysis of genomic DNA from fimgal cells ............. 34 E. Analysis of versicolorin A and aflatoxin production ................... 35 F. Nucleotide sequence analysis .................................... 35 III. Results .......................................................... 38 A. Restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) analysis ............. 38 B. Identification of a duplicated chromosomal region containing the ver-I gene ............................................... 38 C. Nucleotide sequence analysis of ver—IB ............................ 39 D. Functional analysis of the ver-I genes via recombinational inactivation and complementation ................................ 39 IV. Discussion ....................................................... 51 CHAPTER 3 REGULATION OF VER-I GENE EXPRESSION IN FUNGAL CELLS .......... 58 I. Introduction ...................................................... 58 11. Materials and methods .............................................. 59 A. Strains and plasmids .......................................... 59 B. Generation of polyclonal antibodies against the Ver-l protein ........... 60 C. Batch fermentation analysis ..................................... 61 D. Nutritional shift assay ......................................... 61 E. Protein extraction and Western blot analysis ........................ 62 F. Analysis of mycelial dry weight and aflatoxin concentration ............. 62 G. Analysis of the accumulation of the Ver-l protein in a fungal colony ...... 62 H. Analysis of the expression of the ver-I gene in mycelia ................ 63 III. Results .......................................................... 64 A. Specificity of anti-Ver-l antibodies ............................... 64 B. Accumulation of the Ver-l protein in liquid cultures of A. parasiticus ..... 67 C. Accumulation of the Ver-l protein in a fungal colony ................. 72 D. Expression of the ver-I gene in mycelia ............................ 76 IV. Discussion ....................................................... 76 CHAPTER 4 INTRACELLULAR LOCALIZATION OF THE VER-l PROTEIN IN FUNGAL CELLS .................................................... 87 vii I. Introduction ...................................................... 87 11. Materials and methods .............................................. 88 A. Differential centrifugation of fungal cell extracts ..................... 88 1. Grinding in liquid nitrogen ................................ 88 2. Disruption of protoplasts by a homogenizer ................... 89 B. Calculation of the quantity of the Ver-l protein in cell fractions .......... 89 C. Analysis of marker enzyme activities .............................. 9O 1. Succinate dehydrogenase ................................. 9O 2. Catalase .............................................. 91 3. Acid phosphatase ....................................... 91 4. Glucose-6-phosphatase .................................. 92 D. Indirect immunofluorescence microscopy ........................... 92 III. Results .......................................................... 93 A. Subcellular localization of the Ver-l protein in A. parasiticus ........... 93 B. Intracellular localization of the Ver-l protein in A. parasiticus ........... 98 IV. Discussion ...................................................... 103 CONCLUSIONS .................................................... 1 07 APPENDIX PHYSICAL AND TRANSCRIPTIONAL MAP OF AN AFLATOXIN GENE CLUSTER IN ASPERGILLUS PARASITIC US ............................. 109 I. Introduction ..................................................... 109 11. Published paper .................................................. 110 111. Discussion ...................................................... 1 19 LIST OF REFERENCES ............................................. 120 viii LIST OF TABLES Table 1. Distribution of the Ver-l protein in cell fractions obtained from A. parasiticus SU-l by differential centrifugation ..................... 96 Table 2. Distribution of marker enzymes in cell fractions obtained from A. parasiticus SU-l by differential centrifugation ..................... 97 ix LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1. Chemical structures of naturally occurring aflatoxins ................... 4 Figure 2. Metabolic activation of aflatoxin B 1 and its harmfiJl effects ............... 9 Figure 3. The proposed biosynthetic pathway for aflatoxin B 1 ................... 19 Figure 4. Schematic representation of the location of ver-IA and ver-IB on cosmids NorA and Ver2 .............................................. 28 Figure 5. Plasmids used for functional analysis of the ver-I gene in recombinational inactivation and complementation experiments ....................... 32 Figure 6. Strategy for nucleotide sequence analysis of the 1.7-kb EcoRI-HindII fragment which contains the ver-IB gene ........................... 36 Figure 7. Identification of a duplicated chromosomal region containing the ver-I genes by Southern hybridization analysis ........................... 40 Figure 8. An alignment of the nucleotide sequences and the deduced amino acid sequences of ver-IA and ver-IB .................................. 41 Figure 9. Schematic representation of the disruption of ver-IA by plasmid pDV—VA (gene replacement) ........................................... 43 Figure 10.TLC analysis of the metabolites of A. parasiticus VAD-102 ............. 46 Figure 11.Southern hybridization analysis to confirm disruption of the ver-I gene . . . . 47 Figure 12.TLC analysis of the metabolites of transformants obtained by transformation Of A. parasiticus VAD-102 with pVer—Ben ......................... 49 Figure 13. Southern hybridization analysis of A. parasiticus VAD-102 transformed with pVer-Ben ............................................... 50 Figure l4.Proposed schemes for the enzymatic conversion of versicolorin A (VA) to sterigmatocystin (ST) ......................................... Figure 15.A comparison of the deduced amino acid sequences of ver-IA, ver-IB, Streptomyces coelicolor actIII , and Magnaporthe grisea ThnR. ......... Figure 16.Proposed Ver-l protein activity in a two-step dehydroxylation reaction derived from analogous reactions in melanin and cynodontin biosynthesis . . Figure 17.Westem blot analysis to measure the specificity of anti-Ver-l antibodies . . . Figure 18.Batch fermentation analysis of Ver-l protein accumulation in A. parasiticus SU-l ........................................... Figure 19.Nutritional shift assay for the identification of Ver-l protein accumulation in A. parasiticus SU-l ......................................... Figure 20.The morphology of a fungal colony grown on solid YES media .......... Figure 21.Westem blot analysis of the proteins extracted from three concentric zones in fungal colonies ............................................. Figure 22.Analysis of ver-I promoter activity in a fungal colony using the ver-I/GUS reporter strain ...................................... Figure 23.The structure of a typical conidiophore ofAspergillus ................. Figure 24.Microscopic images from the analysis of ver-I promoter activity in mycelia using the ver-I/GUS reporter strain ............................... Figure 25.Westem blot analysis of cell fractions from A. parasiticus SU-l .......... Figure 26.Localization of the Ver-l protein in fimgal cells by immunofluorescence microscopy and laser confocal microscopy .......................... 53 54 57 65 68 7O 73 74 75 77 78 94 99 INTRODUCTION AND RESEARCH RATIONALE Aflatoxin contamination of agricultural commodities and dietary staples such as corn, peanuts, and cottonseed has caused worldwide economic and food safety problems (J elinek et al., 1989). Its impact on the agricultural economy and potential impact on human health has drawn scientists' efforts in an attempt to prevent aflatoxin contamination. The long term goal of this research is the elimination of preharvest aflatoxin contamination from the food chain. An elucidation of the molecular mechanisms which regulate aflatoxin biosynthesis in toxigenic aspergilli may be the best approach to achieve the ultimate goal. For this purpose, it is very important to study aflatoxin biosynthesis at the molecular level and to identify the control points in the aflatoxin biosynthetic pathway. The information derived from these analyses will help in development of strategies to inhibit aflatoxin production in the field. In order to effectively understand the regulation of expression of genes involved in aflatoxin biosynthesis, it is necessary to clone several of these genes and to clearly establish their fiinction. Two pathway genes, nor-1 and ver-I, have been cloned in our laboratory by genetic complementation of Aspergillus parasiticus mutants blocked at unique steps in aflatoxin B1 (AFB,) biosynthesis (Chang et al., 1992; Skory et al., 1992). The present research is mainly focused on the structural and functional characterization of the two copies of the ver-1 gene (ver-IA and ver-IB) and of the Ver-l protein in A. parasiticus. The objective of this study is to understand aflatoxin biosynthesis at the genetic and cellular levels 2 using the ver-I gene as the model system. To achieve this aim, an initial effort was made to establish the function of two ver-I gene copies by recombinational inactivation and genetic complementation experiments. The function of the ver-I gene was further examined by studying the relationship between Ver-l protein accumulation and aflatoxin biosynthesis using batch fermentation analysis and nutritional shift assay (liquid media systems). After the Per-1 gene was confirmed to be directly involved in AFBl biosynthesis, the regulation of its expression was studied during growth on solid media. Finally, the location of the Ver-l protein in fimgal cells was analyzed by subcellular fractionation and immunofluorescence microscopy. This research represents the first analysis to study the regulation of aflatoxin gene expression and the location of aflatoxin-associated enzymes in the fiJngal cells using solid growth media. The resulting data will help in understanding the function of aflatoxin biosynthesis in fungi and may provide a potential approach to develop an efficient way to prevent aflatoxin contamination. CHAPTER 1 LITERATURE REVIEW 1. Natural occurrence of aflatoxins Aflatoxins are biologically active mycotoxins produced by certain strains of the imperfect fiingi Aspergillus parasiticus, A. flavus, and A. nomius (Bennett, 1979; Cotty et al., 1994). A. nomius, however, is less important to the contamination of foods and feeds by aflatoxins. The major aflatoxins of concern include aflatoxin B1, B2, G1, and G2 (Figure 1). When resolved by thin-layer chromatography (TLC), these aflatoxins separate into individual fluorescent compounds in the order given above. Aflatoxins are freely soluble in moderately polar solvents such as chloroform, methanol, and dimethylsulphoxide, and also have some water solubility (McLean and Dutton, 1995). These mycotoxins are usually found together in contaminated foods and feeds. Aflatoxin Bl (AFBI), however, is the most abundant and toxic. Aflatoxin M1 is the major metabolic product of AFB1 in animals and is usually found in the milk and urine of diary cattle and other mammalian species that have consumed aflatoxin-contaminated foods or feeds (Allcrofi et al., 1966). Although both species can produce aflatoxins, A. parasiticus and A. flavus have different abilities in toxin production. First, A. parasiticus produces the aflatoxin B and G groups but A. flavus only produces the aflatoxin B group. Second, most A. parasiticus isolates (> 90 %) produce aflatoxin whereas up to 35% of the A. flavus isolates may not O o o l \ 1L /L ' / O O OCH3 AFLATOXINBl AF LATOXIN G 1 AF LATOXIN G 2 Figure 1. Chemical structures of naturally occurring aflatoxins. 5 produce aflatoxin (Bennett and Papa, 1988; Trail et al., 1995). The contamination of tree nuts, peanuts, and other oilseeds such as corn and cottonseed by aflatoxins occurs under certain environmental conditions when these crops are infected with toxigenic strains of the fungus (Jelinek et al., 1989). Although the fungus may be killed or removed during processing, aflatoxins ofien remain in the final product and thus contribute to the main point of entry of aflatoxins into the food chain (Smith and Moss, 1985). For this reason, the elimination of aflatoxin contamination at the preharvest stage is very important. An alternative route of aflatoxin contamination is the postharvest infection of food or feed with toxigenic fungi and the subsequent formation of toxin at some stage during processing, transport, and storage. A variety of factors which contribute to the contamination of aflatoxins in the food chain include biological and environmental factors (Pestka and Casale, 1990). The biological factors consist of substrate availability for toxigenic fimgi, competing microflora (Ellis et al., 1991), and susceptibility of the crops. The environmental factors include temperature, moisture, insect/bird damage, and mechanical injury of the crops. Warm temperatures and drought conditions favor fungal growth and aflatoxin production in the field. Climatic patterns thus could determine which regions are more prone to aflatoxin contamination. For example, corn in the southeastern regions of the United States is frequently contaminated with aflatoxins. Other areas of the country are occasionally susceptible. For example, due to severe drought, widespread aflatoxin contamination in corn occurred in the midwestern regions of the United States in 1983 and 1988 (Chu, 1991). In the postharvest stage, aflatoxin contamination may result from warm temperatures and high humidity during storage. II. The aflatoxin problem Worldwide, aflatoxins are considered a public health and economic problem because of their potent toxic effects on humans and animals (Chu, 1991; Eaton and Gallagher, 1994) and the huge cost incurred by farmers or producers due to the loss of crops, animals and the need for more careful agronomic practices (Shane, 1994). A. Aflatoxins and public health The threat of aflatoxins to human health was initially realized after they were directly linked to acute hepatotoxicity in poultry (Turkey X disease) in 1960 (Blount, 1961) and later their association with fatal human aflatoxicoses in India (Krishnamachari et al., 1975) and West Africa (N gindu et al., 1982). In the outbreak of aflatoxicosis in northwest India, 108 persons died among 397 persons affected due to consumption of contaminated corn with aflatoxin at levels of 0.25 to 15 mg/kg. The daily AFB, intake was about 55 jig/kg body weight. The symptoms of affected individuals in this outbreak included vomiting, high fever, rapid progressive jaundice, edema of the limbs, and swollen livers. Histopathological examination showed extensive periportal fibrosis and bile duct proliferation of the liver and gastrointestinal hemorrhages. In studies on animals, it was found that no species is resistant to the acute toxic effects of aflatoxins (Newbeme and Butler, 1969). The first signs of aflatoxicosis in animals are the lack of appetite and the loss of weight. Liver centrilobular necrosis, fatty degeneration, and bile duct proliferation are the most common pathological findings. For most of the animals tested, the LD50 for a single dose of AFB, is in the range of 0.5 to 10 mg/kg of body weight. Although interspecific variation has been recognized for acute effects, many factors, such as age, sex, nutritional status of diet, and mode of application, affect the degree of toxicoses. In general, aflatoxin is more toxic to young 7 animals and males than females (Cullen and Newbeme, 1994). Besides the liver, many other organs such as pulmonary (Wieder et al., 1968), gastrointestinal (Bulter, 1964; Deger, 1976), renal (Epstein er al., 1969), nervous (Egbunike and Ikeguonu, 1984), reproductive (Ottinger and Doerr, 1980), and immune systems (Kadian et al., 1988; Pestka and Bondy, 1990) are more or less severely affected with high doses of AFB ,. In well-developed countries, aflatoxin contamination in foods rarely reaches the level that causes acute aflatoxicosis in humans. Hence, studies of aflatoxin toxicity on humans have been focusing on its carcinogenic potential. The carcinogenic properties of aflatoxins have been studied extensively, and much information has been produced concerning various aspects of their mechanisms of action and their putative importance as risk factors for primary hepatocellular carcinoma (PHC) in humans (Busby and Wogan, 1984). Primary liver tumors have been induced by experimental administration of AFB, to animals of many species, including fish (rainbow trout, salmon, and guppy), birds (duck), rodents (5 strains of rats, the B6C3Fl mouse, tree shrew, and hamster), a carnivore (ferret), and subhuman primates (rhesus, cynomolgus, and Afiican green monkeys) (W ogan, 1991). Each of these species has been shown to be susceptible to induction of PHC by AFB, administration. However, in relating this information to putative effects in humans, it is important to note that wide species differences exist with respect to the carcinogenic potency of aflatoxins. The estimated potency of AFB] in inducing liver tumors in animals showed that rats are highly susceptible, mice are highly resistant, and primates are of intermediate susceptibility (Eaton and Gallagher, 1994). In utilizing information derived fi'om these experimental systems for assessing cancer risks for humans resulting from aflatoxin exposures, it is of particular importance to compare the animal data with estimates of human susceptibility derived from epidemiological 8 observations. The consolidated data have been collected from studies in Africa and Asia (Hsieh, 1989; van Rensburg et al., 1985; Yu et al., 1898), where aflatoxin intake was measured in populations in which PHC incidence was variable, as determined from cancer registry information. In general, aflatoxin intake values increase in parallel with cancer incidence. Although the causative role for aflatoxins in human liver cancer has not been universally accepted because of the presence of endemic hepatitis B virus in high risk populations (Stolofi‘, 1989), the International Agency for Research on Cancer has determined that the combined experimental and epidemiological evidence was sufficient to designate aflatoxins as human carcinogens (IARC, 1993). Studies of the metabolism of AFB, have revealed that the compound is activated to its toxic form predominantly by liver-specific, cytochrome P450 IIIA4 monooxygenases in mammals (Coros etal., 1990). Metabolic activation of AFB, to AFB ,-8,9-epoxide (Figure 2) is believed to result in its toxicity, mutagenicity, and carcinogenicity (Campbell and Hayes, 1976; Gurtoo and Dave, 1975). The aflatoxins listed in order of terms of acute and chronic toxicity are AFB, > AF G, > AFB, > AFG , suggesting that epoxidation of the 8,9-double bond and also the presence of the cyclopentenone ring of the B compounds (when compared with the six-membered lactone ring of the G compounds) may play a major role in the harmful effects (McLean and Dutton, 1995). The AFB,-8,9-epoxide and its hydration product, the dihydrodiol form of AFB, (Figure 2) are highly reactive and can covalently bind to cellular macromolecules. The epoxide specifically binds to the N7 position of guanine of DNA and RNA (Cory and Wogan, 1981), while the dihydrodiol links to proteins by the formation of a Schiff base structure (Hsieh, 1987). The major DNA adduct formed in vivo and in vitro afier depurination is 8,9-dihydro-8-(N7—guanyl)-9-hydroxy AFB, (AFB ,-guanine), which can o 0 ° I 0 0 OCH3 Aflatoxin Bl (AFBl) wane P450 (3) o o o l O AFBl-8,9-epoxrde O Epoxide HO I hydrolase 0 o o OCH N + o o HN 7| ~ N O NH2 N HO l l DNA-dR—DNA ”° ° ° °°H3 8,9-Dihydro-8-[N7-guanyl]-9-hydroxyAFB1 AFBl-8,9-dihydrodiol Protein binding Mutation Toxicity Cancer Figure 2. Metabolic activation of aflatoxin B1 and its harmful effects. (Eaton and Gallagher, 1994) 10 thus be used as a biomarker in urine for aflatoxin exposure (Groopman, 1994). Depurination at guanine residues could lead to a GC —> TA transversion during replication. Evidence has been collected which suggests that AFB, induces a mutation of the p53 tumor-suppressor gene in codon 249 (Hsu et al., 1991; Bressac et al., 1991) and may result in the development of human hepatocellular carcinoma. It has also been reported that the activated form of AFB, induces virus expression and tumor formation associated with ras (McMahon et al., 1980) and myc (Larson et al., 1980) oncogenes. B. Aflatoxins and economic losses While considerable research has been directed to the prevalence, chemical characterization, and biochemical action of aflatoxins, less attention has been paid toward calculating the economic impact of aflatoxins on society. This is because hidden or indirect factors may result in the significant financial losses which are difficult to evaluate. Instead of considering aflatoxins only, people generally take all mycotoxins into account when evaluating economic losses. Nevertheless, it is believed that aflatoxin-associated losses play a major part because of the widespread contamination of aflatoxins in the world and their extremely toxic effects. It was estimated that billions of dollars are lost annually in direct and indirect costs which result from the fact that approximately 25% of the world’s crops are affected by mycotoxins (CAST, 1989). This huge loss encompassed a broad category of crop and animal industries, and extends through the food chain from producers to the consumer (Shane, 1994). Because of the threat of aflatoxins to public health, the US. Food and Drug Administration has set action levels of 20 ppb for aflatoxins in human food, 0.5 ppb for AFM, in milk and dairy products, and 20 to 300 ppb in most animal feeds (CAST, 1989). In some 11 European countries the action level is even more restrictive. The cost to the agronomic sector is thus increased due to efforts to meet these guidelines. The preharvest mycotoxin contamination of corn was recognized in the mid-19705 (Lisker and Lillehoj, 1991). Since then, significant costs have been associated with mainly two approaches to reduce preharvest aflatoxin contamination, namely the development of resistant cultivars and the improvement of farming practices. For example, significant costs arise from implementation of breeding programs which are utilized to select cultivars resistant to insect damage, drought, and fungal infection. Financial losses also may arise from the reduced yield of the resistant crops. The costs associated with improved farming practices include irrigation to prevent desiccation, the use of insecticides or firngicides to prevent infection, the use of additional fertilizers to reduce environmental stress, and the use of modified harvesting methods to avoid crop damage. Costs can also result fi'om improvements in postharvest handling of grains and other ingredients. These include modified transport and mechanization to reduce damage, intensified drying of grain to achieve desirable moisture levels, improved storage control to prevent filngal contamination, and proper quality control procedures to monitor toxin levels. If, at last, the contamination level is too high, it is necessary to reduce the toxin content by physical or chemical treatment or the contaminated grain must be either destroyed or downgraded and hence reduce the revenue for producers. Aflatoxin contamination is also responsible for financial losses in domestic animal production, including ruminant, monogastric, and aquatic species (Nelson and Christensen, 1978). The major economic impact consists of aflatoxin-induced death (Smith and Hamilton, 1970), a depression in growth rate and feed conversion efficiency (Dalvi, 1986), and an increase in plant condemnation (Shane, 1991). In the poultry industry, ducklings are the most 12 susceptible species to aflatoxicosis. Turkey poults are more resistant than ducklings but are ten times more sensitive than four-week-old chickens. In summary, aflatoxin contamination causes huge financial losses to food processors, and producers of commodities and domestic animals. The costs ultimately are borne by consumers or the national economy. 111. Control of aflatoxins Because of the public health and economic problems caused by aflatoxins, it is very important and urgent to find ways to efficiently control their occurrence. Ideally, any method should be technically and economically feasible if it is to be applied practically. Some other factors should also be considered including safety, retention of nutritional elements, and the lack of hannfirl effects to the environment. To date numerous methods have been tested although they still do not meet all of the control criteria. In general, the control of aflatoxins can be divided into three principal categories : prevention, decontamination or detoxification, and reduction of aflatoxin bioavailability. A. Prevention The prevention of aflatoxin formation in agricultural products and other foodstuffs can occur at the pre- and post-harvest level by regulating the environmental factors influencing fungal growth and toxin production. Many environmental conditions have been identified which can promote aflatoxin formation in growing crops including : insect infestation, drought conditions, mechanical damage, nutritional deficiencies, and unseasonable temperatures and rainfall (Smith and Moss, 1985a). Conventional on-farm preventative techniques such as methods of cultivating to improve plant vigor, the use of insecticides and 13 fungicides to reduce insect and fungal infestation, irrigation to avoid drought conditions, and the use of resistant varieties (Darrah and Barry, 1991; Scott and Zummo, 1988) have been utilized to help overcome these environmental stress although these are ofien too costly or are inefi‘ective. Post-harvest (during processing, storage, and shipment) control of aflatoxin contamination prevents or delays toxigenic mold growth through manipulation of moisture levels, temperature, aeration, and mold spore density (Darrah and Barry, 1991). Biocontrol using nontoxigenic strains of A. parasiticus and A. flavus is another potential approach for the preharvest prevention of aflatoxin contamination. It has been demonstrated that this strategy can significantly reduce aflatoxin contamination in peanuts and cottonseed (Cotty, 1990; Domer et al., 1992; Ehrlich, 1987). Biocompetitive control, however, has to be evaluated for its feasibility regarding the stability of the non-aflatoxin producing strains and the environmental impact. The potential for naturally occurring nontoxigenic strains to produce aflatoxins may be a major concern (Rarick et al., 1994) of this technology. Additional studies are needed to address the microbial ecological changes after releasing the biocontrol agent in the field. B. Decontamination or detoxification Once a product is contaminated with aflatoxins, there are only two options if it is to be used for human or animal consumption : to remove aflatoxins or to degrade them into non- toxic compounds. Practical methods are being investigated for removal and detoxification of aflatoxins from foods and feeds. 1. Removal of aflatoxins (a) EMS—Cm. In large particle size agricultural products such as the peanut, Brazil nut or almonds, aflatoxin contamination, when it occurs, is normally confined in any 14 batch to a small number of contaminated seeds or kernels (Smith and Moss, 1985a). It has been shown that the level of aflatoxin in peanuts can be correlated with the proportion of loose-shelled or discolored kernels. When these are discarded the remaining kernels are relatively free of aflatoxins. Off-colored kernels can be separated either by hand or by passing through color sorters (Cole, 1898). Density segregation by flotation in water or a salt solution is another way to separate toxic kernels from sound, nontoxic kernels (Hagler, 1991; Huff, 1980; Huff and Hagler, 1985; Kirksey et al., 1989). Physical separation, however, causes some loss of raw materials. (b) Wanting. Numerous solvent extraction systems have been developed to remove aflatoxins from contaminated materials with minimal effects on protein content or nutritional quality (Rayner, 1977). These systems include 95% ethanol, 90% aqueous acetone, 80% isopropanol, hexane-methanol, and hexane-acetone-water mixtures. Although solvent extraction can be highly successful in removing aflatoxins, the cost of the additional processing and the need for special solvent-removing equipment, etc., have made these processes of questionable economic value. Besides, residues of solvent in food and feed would cause additional safety problems. 2. Degradation or detoxification (a) Winds. Of these methods, irradiation and thermal inactivation are considered here. Aflatoxins are sensitive to ultraviolet light. However, the degradation of aflatoxin in contaminated products is dependent on the nature of the solvent, the toxin concentration and the length of exposure to UV light (Shantha, 1986). Aflatoxins are resistant to thermal inactivation and are not destroyed completely by boiling water, autoclaving, or a variety of food and feed processing procedures (Phillips, 1994). With dry 15 heat such as roasting, temperatures approaching the melting point (250°C) of aflatoxin must be used to effectively degrade the toxin. Increasing the moisture content and/or time of heating increases the rate of aflatoxin degradation (Mann, 1967). However, the adverse effects of heat treatment on the appearance and nutritional value of the product makes the practical application of these methods highly doubtful. (b) WM. Several chemicals have been tested for the destruction of aflatoxins including acids, aldehydes, oxidizing agents and gases. The treatment of grain with ammonia appears to be a valuable approach to the detoxification of aflatoxins. Ammonia used as an anhydrous gas at elevated temperatures and pressures can cause a 95-98% reduction in total aflatoxin concentration in peanuts, cottonseed meal and corn (Brekke et al., 1977; Gardner et al., 1971; Park et al., 1984). This method is legal and is being used on a commercial scale in certain states of the US (Alabama, Arizona, California, Georgia, North Carolina and Texas) for animal feeds. Ammoniation is also used routinely in Mexico, France, South Afiica, Senegal, Brazil, and India (Piva et al., 1995; Phillips et al., 1994). The drawback of ammonia treatment is the need to build special plants because ammonia corrodes metal and becomes explosive in the air. This would result in a substantial increase in costs which cannot be afforded by most farmers. Besides, ammonia treatment may lead to an undesirable brown color in the feed and the diminished content of specific amino acids such as cystine, methionine and lysine (Piva et al., 1995). Oxidizing agents such as sodium bisulfite have been shown to degrade aflatoxins in naturally contaminated grain (Doyle and Marth, 1978). When compared with ammonia treatment, bisulfite treatment is less efficient in detoxification of aflatoxins. Bisulfite treatment, however, is much less costly than ammonia treatment. In addition, sodium bisulfite 16 is commonly added to food and drinks where it acts as antioxidant, enzyme inhibitor, and bacteriostatic agent. It therefore may be competitive with the ammoniation process. Calcium hydroxide is another chemical which has been shown to be able to reduce aflatoxin levels (Codifer et al., 1976). The advantages of using sodium hydroxide are its low cost and easy application because it is the cheapest alkali and can be readily mixed with the feed to be detoxified. However, the low efficiency (less than 45 %) in the destruction of AFB, is a big concern (Piva et al., 1995). (clljiglggical methods. Many microorganisms including bacteria, actinomycetes, yeast, molds, and algae show varying abilities to degrade aflatoxin. The most active organism so far discovered is Flavobacterium aurantiacum (NRRL B-184) which in aqueous solution can take up and metabolize aflatoxin B,, G, and M, (Ciegler et al., 1966). As yet no commercial application has been developed because the safe and practical use of Flavobacterium aurantiacum in feed or food has not been established. C. Reduction of aflatoxin bioavailability 1. Selective chemisorption Numerous studies have demonstrated that the use of clays in contaminated feeds can reduce aflatoxin absorption in the intestine of animals. Tests in vitro showed that absorbents such as aluminas, silicas, and aluminosilicates are capable of binding aflatoxin in solution (Phillips et al., 1988). It was observed that hydrated sodium calcium aluminosilicates (HSCAS) were the most efficient in binding aflatoxins. HSCAS are currently used as anticaking agents for animal feeds and were found to prevent aflatoxicosis in domestic animals (Davidson et al., 1987; Kubena er al., 1990) and to decrease the level of AFM, in the milk of dairy cattle (Harvey er al., 1991). l7 2. Chemoprotection against aflatoxin toxicity Methods have been suggested for the protection of animals and humans against the effects of aflatoxins by prior treatment with chemicals or drugs that induce protective detoxifying liver enzymes (Kensler et al., 1991). A dithiolethione compound, oltipraz, has been demonstrated to be a potent inhibitor of AFB ,-induced hepatocarcinogenesis in rats. It is believed that this drug induces phase II enzymes, including the glutathione S-transferase, and thus could enhance the detoxification of AFB, (Ansher et al., 1986; Bueding et al., 1982) In summary, since no practical method is currently available for preharvest prevention of aflatoxin contamination of foods and feeds, all potential methods for postharvest aflatoxin detoxification must be considered as important at this point in time. Nevertheless, the prevention of aflatoxin contamination before harvest is the best long-term approach because the technology would eliminate or reduce the need for handling aflatoxin-contaminated commodities by growers or processors. IV. Biosynthesis of aflatoxins A. Chemical and biochemical aspects Because of the extreme toxicity of aflatoxins, elucidation of the biosynthetic pathway has become a very popular topic since their discovery in 1960. To date aflatoxin biosynthesis is the best characterized biosynthetic pathway of fungal secondary metabolism. Studies using blocked mutants, metabolic inhibitors, and radiolabeled precursors in bioconversion experiments have lead to a relatively clear picture of the biochemical pathway utilized for synthesis of AFB, (Bennett et al., 1980; Bhatnagar er al., 1987; Hsieh et al., 1973, 1976; Lee 18 etal., 1976; McCormick et al., 1987; Shroeder et al., 1974; Steyn et al., 1980). Data on the biosynthetic intermediates and enzymes in the AFB, pathway have been collected (Bhatnagar et al., 1992; Dutton, 1988) and the putative biosynthetic scheme is shown in Figure 3. AFB, is a polyketide-derived secondary metabolite which is synthesized from acetate and malonate in a process analogous to fatty acid synthesis. As described by Bennett and Christensen (1983), the precursors in biosynthetic pathway include one acetyl CoA and 9 malonyl CoA. The early steps of AFB, biosynthesis are the same as those in fatty acid biosynthesis with condensation of acetyl COA and 2 Malonyl COA molecules in the presence of NADPH to form a hexanoate starter unit (Towsend et al., 1984). Condensation of this starter unit with 7 malonyl COA molecules then proceeds to form a C20 polyketide chain without further ketoreduction. Cyclization and oxidation then occur to form the first stable anthraquinone intermediate, norsolorinic acid (NA), which is then converted to (sequentially) averantin (AVN), averufanin (AVNN), averufin (AVF), versiconal hemiacetal acetate (VHA), versiconal (VHOH), versicolorin B (VB), versicolorin A (VA), sterigmatocystin (ST), 0- methylsterigmatocystin (OMST), and the final product AFB ,. Mutants blocked in aflatoxin biosynthesis played an important role in elucidating this pathway. In this regard, the pathway blocked mutants of A. parasiticus were more useful than those of A. flavus. This is because mutants isolated from A. parasiticus accumulate pigmented pathway intermediates. Most of the mutants of A. flavus, on the other hand, do not accumulate pigments. For example, the pigments NA, AVN, AVF, and VA were identified from A. parasiticus non-aflatoxin producing mutants. These four pigments were then isolated fi'om fungal mycelia and their chemical structures identified. Radiolabelled pigments were used in feeding studies to demonstrate that they could be converted to AFB, l9 Acetyl COA Malonyl COA k, 0 OH o OH OH OH O OH H3 CH3 ——> we“ We“ 0 O Norsolorinic Acid (NA) / Averantin (AVN) OH O OH OH O OH 0 CH3 0 4—— ... meme .. O o Averufin (AVF) \ Averufanin (AVNN) OH O OH OH o OH O ——-> M. .. . «a .. WIT“... O O Versiconal Herniacetal Acetate (VHA) / Versiconal (VHOH) OH o OH OH O OH I <—— O at“, Fr“, 0 O Versicolorin A (VA) Versicolorin B (VB) @0013 O o O OCH3 o o OCH3 Sterigmatocystin (ST) /0-methylsterigmatocystin (OMST) O O ° 1 o o OCH3 Aflatoxin B 1 (AFB 1) Figure 3. The proposed biosynthetic pathway for aflatoxin Bl 20 by toxigenic fungi. The sequential order of these intermediates was determined according to their efficiencies of conversion to AFB, and their relative chemical structures. AVNN, a metabolite of A. parasiticus was then demonstrated to be incorporated into AFB, and was placed between AVN and AVF based on a logical organic conversion mechanism (McCormick et al., 1987). VHA was identified because it accumulated after inhibition of an esterase activity by the insecticide dichlorvos (Y ao and Hsieh, 1974). The intermediates after VA are not pigmented. ST and OMST isolated from A. versicolor and A. parasiticus, respectively, were placed downstream from VA by a bioconversion assay (Hsieh et al., 1973; Bhatnagar et al., 1987). It is estimated that at least 17 enzymatic activities are associated with this complex pathway (Bhatnagar et al., 1992; Dutton, 1988). Several pathway enzymes have been purified to homogeneity including two NA reductases (N A~ AVN; Bhatnagar and Cleveland, 1990; Chuturgoon et al., 1990), two VHA reductases (VHA-wersiconol acetate[VOAc]; Matsushima et al., 1994), one versiconal cyclase (VHOH~VB; Lin and Anderson, 1992; Townsend et al., 1991), and two O-methyltransferases (ST-OMST; Bhatnagar et al., 1988; Keller et al., 1992). Those enzymes which have been identified or partially purified are the esterase (VHA-VHOH; Yabe and Hamaski, 1993), the desaturase (VB-'VA; Yabe et al., 1991), and the oxidoreductase (OMST-AFB 1; Bhatnagar et al., 1989). Nevertheless, many other enzymes involved in the biosynthetic pathway have not been identified. B. Genetic and molecular aspects 1. Classical genetic analysis Conventional genetic analysis of aflatoxin biosynthesis was hampered because neither A. flavus nor A. parasiticus has a sexual reproductive stage. However, genetic linkage of 21 genes for aflatoxin biosynthesis in both fungi was studied using the parasexual cycle (Bennett, 1979; Papa, 1973). The genetic markers in genetic linkage analysis included auxotrophic mutants, spore color mutants, and aflatoxin pathway mutants. The genetics of A. flavus, however, is better understood than that of A. parasiticus. Over 30 genes including 11 aflatoxin genes have been mapped to 8 linkage groups (Bennett and Papa, 198 8). Of the 11 aflatoxin loci mapped, l is on linkage group II, 9 are on linkage group VII, and 1 is on linkage group VIII. The aflatoxin loci are nonallelic and recessive in diploids, with the exception of the mutant containing the afl-I allele. The generation of physical mapping data of the aflatoxin genes was enhanced by the development of the electrophoretic karyotype analysis. Using pulsed-field gel electrophoresis, the genomes of A. flavus and A. parasiticus have been separated into 6 to 8 chromosomes with sizes ranging from 3 to 7 Mb (Keller et al., 1992). In an attempt to assign the linkage groups identified from genetic linkage studies to these separated chromosomes, Foutz et al. (1995) have cloned seven previously mapped auxotrophic genes which hybridized to 7 individual chromosomes. These specific probes could help in future studies to determine the karyotypic map of aflatoxin genes. 2. Molecular genetics A logical approach to prevent aflatoxin contamination is to block their production in the field at the preharvest stage. The development of a thorough understanding of aflatoxin biosynthesis at the molecular level may aid in this approach. Cloning of genes associated with aflatoxin biosynthesis is the first step to effectively understand the regulation of gene expression. The cloned genes can be used as targets for gene disruption to generate genetically stable nontoxigenic strains of Aspergillus spp. which can be utilized in the field 22 as biocontrol agents. On the other hand, cloning of aflatoxin pathway genes and subsequent identification of regulatory genes will provide molecular probes for investigating the specific molecular regulation of aflatoxin biosynthesis in fungal culture and in host plant tissue in which aflatoxin contamination occurs. This could lead to the identification of candidate compounds which are able to block aflatoxin biosynthesis in firngi. It may be possible to directly use these compounds in the field or to construct resistant plants which naturally produce these compounds. Three different strategies have been used to isolate genes involved in aflatoxin biosynthesis. Differential screening of a cDNA library, a relatively nonspecific approach, has been used to identify genes in A. parasiticus (F eng et al., 1992) and A. flavus (Woloshuk and Payne, 1994) that may be associated with aflatoxin biosynthesis. This method is based on the principle that aflatoxin associated genes are transcribed under the conditions supporting aflatoxin production. These genes, on the contrary, are not transcribed or are transcribed in much lower amounts under non-aflatoxin supporting conditions. Therefore toxin specific cDNA clones theoretically could be isolated by hybridization to RNA extracted from aflatoxin-producing cultures but not to RNA from non-aflatoxin—producing cultures. The major disadvantage of this approach is that many nonspecific cDNA clones may be obtained and cause difficulties in the selection and study of their exact firnctions. A second approach is reverse genetics. In this method, it is necessary to identify and purify pathway proteins which can be used to generate antibodies for use as immunoscreening probes. Alternatively, protein sequence data should allow the design of oligonucleotide probes to isolate the specific genes. Using a reverse genetics approach, a 1.5-kb genomic DNA clone (pF9-1) from A. flavus NRRL 3357 was identified with an oligonucleotide based 23 on the amino acid sequence of the N-terminus of the purified methyltransferase which converts ST to OMST (Keller et al., 1992). This omrA gene also has been cloned from A. parasiticus by using antibodies (raised to the purified methyltransferase) to screen a cDNA expression library (Y u et al., 1993). Recently, an A. parasiticus dehydrogenase gene, norA, was cloned by the same strategy using a monoclonal antibody raised against a purified norsolorinic acid reductase involved in the conversion of NA to AVN. A third approach involves genetic complementation of firngal mutants deficient in aflatoxin biosynthesis followed by rescuing genes associated with aflatoxin production. Genetic transformation systems have been developed for A. parasiticus (Horng et al., 1990; Skory et al., 1990) and A. flavus (Woloshuk et al., 1989). Using these transformation systems, the nor-1 gene, associated with the conversion of NA to AVN (Chang et al., 1992), the ver-I gene, associated with the conversion of VA to ST (Skory et al., 1992), and the fas- [A gene, encoding a putative fatty acid synthetase involved in polyketide backbone synthesis (Mahanti et al., 1996), were cloned by genetic complementation of A. parasiticus mutants blocked at unique steps in AFB, synthesis. Complementation was performed by transformation of a cosmid DNA library constructed using genomic DNA from a wild-type aflatoxin-producing strain A. parasiticus NRRL 5862 (SU-l). A regulatory gene, aflR, was first isolated from A. flavus by genetic complementation (Payne et al., 1993). The homologue of A. flavus aflR was later identified in A. parasiticus based on its ability to upregulate aflatoxin biosynthesis when it was transformed into a wild-type toxigenic strain (Chang et al., 1993). The isolation of these pathway genes made it possible to elucidate a detailed physical map of the genes involved in aflatoxin biosynthesis. In the process of cloning the nor-1 and 24 ver-I genes fiom A. parasiticus, it was found that these two genes are located within a 35-kb genomic DNA fragment contained in cosmid NorA and on a single chromosome. The aflatoxin gene cluster was firrther confirmed by mapping the position of fax-1A, aflR, and omtA in the genomic DNA of both A. flavus and A. parasiticus. Transcriptional mapping studies have shown that this cluster may extend up to 60-kb (Trail et al., 1995 ; Yu et al., 1995). Taking advantage of transcripts identified in this cluster, it was possible to elucidate the function of originally non-identified genes by gene disruption analysis. For example, a pksA gene encoding a putative polyketide synthase was identified adjacent to nor-1 by gene disruption analysis (Chang et al., 1995; Trail et al., 1995). The order of aflatoxin genes in the clusters is similar in the two aflatoxin-producing Aspergillus. The spacing between these genes, however, is different (Yu et al., 1995). V. Regulation of aflatoxin biosynthesis As a secondary metabolite, aflatoxins are produced when the fungus reaches the end of active growth phase during batch fermentation. Because the precursor (i.e. acetate) of aflatoxin biosynthesis is the product of the primary metabolism, the factors which regulate primary metabolism could influence aflatoxin biosynthesis. Carbohydrate metabolism has been shown to affect the production of aflatoxins. Several simple carbon sources, especially glucose, sucrose, and maltose, have been shown to support and stimulate aflatoxin production (Luchese and Harrigan, 1993). Glucose can be catabolized by aspergilli either by way of the Embden-Meyerhoff or the hexose monophosphate pathways simultaneously (Zaika and Buchanan, 1987). Aerobic conditions favor utilization of the hexose monophosphate pathway and anaerobic conditions favor the Embden-Meyerhoff pathway. It has been reported that 25 the amount of aflatoxin production depends on the pathway by which glucose is catabolized by the fimgi (Shih and Marth, 1974). The study showed that less aflatoxins were produced in extensively aerated cultures of A. parasiticus and the efficiency of [l-“C]glucose incorporation was less than that in stationary cultures. Shih and Marth (1974) concluded that in less aerobic conditions oxidation of acetate (via the citric acid cycle) would be decreased and more acetate would be available for synthesis of aflatoxins. It has also been proposed that a low NADPH/NADP ratio favors aflatoxin production (Niehaus and Dilts, 1984). The increased aflatoxin production observed in a less aerobic environment could therefore result from the decreased formation of NADPH via the hexose monophosphate pathway. An alcohol dehydrogenase gene, adh], has been cloned from A. flavus (Woloshuk and Payne, 1994). The transcription of this gene is induced during aflatoxin production. Although the exact role of adh] in aflatoxin biosynthesis in not known, it is hypothesized that alcoholic fermentation may be important for the use of glucose through the glycolytic pathway under less aerobic conditions and may be associated with aflatoxin biosynthesis. Instead of relying solely on the regulation of primary metabolism, aflatoxin biosynthesis could also be regulated at the level of secondary metabolism. Skory et a1. (1993) have reported that the regulated expression of the aflatoxin pathway genes, nor-1 and ver-I, is in part at the level of transcription. The accumulation of the RNA transcripts from other aflatoxin associated genes was shown to follow a similar pattern as nor-1 and ver-I (Trail et al., 1995). This suggested that aflatoxin genes may be regulated by a common regulatory factor or some specific factors activated at the same time for aflatoxin synthesis. The genetic evidence suggests that aflR is a specific regulatory gene in aflatoxin biosynthesis. Metabolite feeding studies demonstrated that aflR is required for the conversion of several different 26 pathway intermediates to aflatoxins (Payne et al., 1993). Moreover, the aflR gene is capable of inducing transcription of several aflatoxin pathway genes and expression of several aflatoxin pathway enzymatic activities simultaneously in cell extracts (Chang et al., 1995; Payne er al., 1993). Analysis of the predicted amino acid sequence of aflR showed that there is a cysteine—rich binuclear zinc cluster DNA-binding motif, Cys-Xaa2-Cys—Xaa6-Cys—Xaa6- Cys-Xaa2-Cys-Xaa6-Cys, which has been found in several fungal transcriptional regulatory proteins (W oloshuk et al., 1994). In addition to aflR, a putative regulatory locus, afl-I, was identified in A. flavus (Bennett and Papa, 1988). Recently, it was demonstrated that a heterozygous diploid strain with both mutant (afl-I) and wild-type (afl-I’“) alleles lost its ability to produce aflatoxin and to transcribe the nor-1, ver-I, and omtA genes. However, expression of the aflR gene was not suppressed (Woloshuk et al., 1995) which suggests that aflR is not the only regulator of AFB, biosynthesis. The real function ofafl-I in regulation of aflatoxin biosynthesis will not be clear until the afl-I gene can be isolated in the future study. Since several aflatoxin pathway genes have been cloned, it is now possible to elucidate the cis-acting DNA elements and trans-acting proteins that regulate aflatoxin synthesis. One approach to accomplish this task is to fuse the aflatoxin gene promoter to a reporter gene such as the GUS gene (uidA gene; encodes B-glucuronidase). Fungal strains containing these reporter constructs could be used to identify the cis-acting elements (Trail et al., 1994; Wu and Linz, 1994). Afier identification of the cis-acting elements, promoter fragments can be used in mobility shift assays to identify and thereafter purify the specific trans-acting proteins which regulate aflatoxin biosynthesis. CHAPTER 2 STRUCTURAL AND FUNCTIONAL CHARACTERIZATION OF THE VER-I GENE I. INTRODUCTION In a previous study (Skory et al., 1992), the ver-I gene was cloned based on its ability to complement the versicolorin A (VA) accumulating strain, A. parasiticus CSlO (ver-I, wh- 1, pyrG; derived from ATCC 36537; Lee et al., 1975), to produce aflatoxins. The nucleotide sequence of a genomic DNA fragment and cDNA fragment covering the entire ver-I coding region has been determined (Skory et al., 1992). The predicted amino acid sequence, deduced fi'om the ver-I nucleotide sequence, was compared with the EMBL and GenBank data bases. The search revealed striking similarity with Streptomyces ketoreductases involved in polyketide biosynthesis. This observation resulted in the prediction that the ver-I gene encodes a protein that has enzymatic activity associated with AFB, biosynthesis. Southern hybridization analysis using the cloned ver-I gene as a probe indicated that there are two copies of the ver-I gene in A. parasiticus SU—l (Skory, 1992). By in situ colony hybridization of the genomic DNA library constructed by Skory et al (1992), two cosmid vectors, NorA and Ver2, were found to contain the ver-I gene. The location of the ver-I gene on the two cosmid vectors is shown in Figure 4. The gene copy located on a 2.1- kb EcoRI fragment of the cosmid NorA was named ver-IA. The other ver-I gene copy 27 28 Figure 4. Schematic representation of the location of ver-IA and ver-IB on cosmids NorA and Ver2, respectively. The number in parentheses is the size of the restriction fi'agment in kilobase pairs. The arrow indicates the duplicated region. B, BamHI; E, EcoRI; S, SalI. 29 mm mm vm ON 3 N~ w v o 0.x A 2.58 «as: ”NINA“ :3 i 5.3.... m m m m 3.8 ad 8.: I a. A 2580 <3: v m w V7.8... ES: 5? V~.§\ 78: V23 m m mm m m m m m m ad ad $8 5: 68?: ad 86 8.3 6.3 Figure 4. 30 located on a 5.1-kb EcoRI fragment of the cosmid Ver2 was designated ver-IB. The flanking regions (3.2-kb EcoRI fragments; see Figure 4) Of ver-IA and ver-IB genes were found to hybridize to each other in Southern hybridization analysis. This indicated that there is a duplicated region around the ver-I gene in the chromosomal DNA. Based on the complementation analysis and nucleotide sequence data, it was hypothesized that the cloned ver-I gene encodes a protein involved in the conversion of the AFB, pathway intermediate VA to sterigmatocystin (ST). To address this hypothesis, the following experiments were designed and accomplished in this study. First, restriction fiagment length polymorphism (RFLP) analysis of ver-IA, ver-IB, and the cloned ver-I gene confirmed that the gene previously cloned is ver-IA. Second, a duplicated chromosomal region (approximately 12-kb) was identified upstream from ver-IA and ver-IB by Southern hybridization analysis. Third, the nucleotide sequence of ver-IB was determined. A translational stop codon, found in the ver-IB coding region, indicated that it encodes a truncated polypeptide with no firnction. Fourth, recombinational inactivation and genetic complementation experiments confirmed that ver-IA is the only functional copy of ver-I in A. parasiticus SU—l and that its gene product is directly involved in the conversion of VA to ST. 11. MATERIALS AND METHODS A. Strains and plasmids Escherichia coli DHSa F' ° [F '/endAI hst17 (r; m; ) supE44 thi-I recA] gyrA (Nal’) reIA1A(lacZYA-argF)u,69(m801acZAM15)](Gibco BRL, Life Technologies, Inc. Gaithersburg, MD) was used to propagate plasmid DNA. A. parasiticus NRRLS 862 (SU-l; 31 ATCC 56775; Bennett, 1979), a wild-type aflatoxin-producing strain, was used as the control strain. The nitrate reductase (niaD) deficient strain, NR-l , derived from A. parasiticus SU- 1, was used as the recipient strain for ver-I gene disruption analysis. VA, used as a standard in thin-layer chromatography (TLC) assays, was purified from A. parasiticus ATCC 36537 (ver- 1, wh-I) according to the procedure of Lee et al. (1975). Plasmid pDV-VA (Figure 5A) was constructed for ver-I gene disruption. A 4.4-kb PstI genomic DNA fragment containing ver-IA was inserted into pBluescriptII SK(-) to generate pVer-AP. This plasmid was cut near the middle of the ver-IA coding region (StuI) and blunt- end ligated to a 6.2-kb PvuII fragment containing the functional niaD gene. For ver-I complementation experiments, plasmid pVer-Ben (Figure 5B) was constructed. A 4.1-kb XbaI/XhoI DNA fragment containing ver-IA was subcloned into pBluescriptII SK (-) to generate pVer-AX. Then, a 7.0-kb XbaI fragment containing the ben1r gene (confers resistance to benomyl) fi'om pYTl (Wu et al., 1996) was inserted into pVer-AX to generate pVer-Ben. pSL82 (Horng etal., 1990), a plasmid containing a complete copy ofniaD, and pYTl, containing ben’, were used as positive controls in recombinational inactivation and genetic complementation experiments, respectively. B. Bacterial cell transformation and plasmid purification The preparation and transformation of competent cells were conducted by a calcium chloride method (Ausubel et al., 1993). Recombinant cells were screened on MacConkey agar (Difco) or selected by standard colony hybridization techniques (Maniatis et al., 1989). Minipreparation of plasmid DNA using alkaline lysis and large scale preparation of plasmid DNA by CsCl/ethidium bromide equilibrium centrifugation were conducted using standard methods described by Ausubel et al.(1993). 32 Figure 5. Plasmids used for functional analysis of the ver-I gene in recombinational inactivation and complementation experiments. (A) The plasmid pDV-VA used for recombinational inactivation of the ver-I gene. The white block region is a 6.2-kb PvuII fragment containing the niaD gene. The black blocks represent the coding region of ver-IA split by the niaD containing fragment. The hashed regions are the 5' and 3' flanking regions Of ver-IA. The single black line represents pBluescriptII SK(-). (B) The plasmid pVer-Ben used for complementation of A. parasiticus VAD-102. The white block is a 7.0-kb XbaI fragment containing the ben’ gene. The black block is the coding region of ver-IA. The hashed blocks are the 5' and 3' flanking regions of ver-IA. The single black line represents pBluescriptII SK(-). 33 Figure 5. A. , pDV-VA 13.5 kb B. 14-0 lrb 34 C. Transformation of fungal protoplasts Fungal protoplasts were transformed using a polyethylene glycol procedure (Oakley et al., 1987) with minor modifications as described by Skory et al. (1990). Approximately 108 conidia of A. parasiticus NR-l were incubated in yeast extract-sucrose liquid medium (YES; 2% yeast extract, 6% sucrose, pH 5.8) for 15 hr at 29°C with shaking (150 rpm) in the dark. The mycelia were harvested and digested with Novozyme 234 (Novo Industries, Danbury, Conn.) to generate protoplasts. To 100 pl protoplast suspension, 5 - 10 ug DNA in 10 ul TE buffer (lOmM Tris-HCl, lmM EDTA, pH 8.0) and 50 pl PEG solution (25% polyethylene glycol 3350, 50mM CaC12, lOmM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5) were added. The mixture was incubated on ice for 20 min. 1 ml PEG solution was added and the mixture was firrther incubated at room temperature for 30 min. Finally, the protoplasts were spread onto selective agar media. Cells transformed with plasmid pSL82 and pDV-VA were screened for their ability to utilize nitrate on Czapek-Dox agar (CZ agar, Difco), a defined medium containing 20% sucrose as the osmotic stabilizer. When transformed with pYTl or pVer-Ben, benomyl resistant transformants were selected on CZ containing benomyl (2 ug/ml). Transforrnant colonies were then transferred to coconut agar medium (CAL/I) for screening aflatoxin production by visualization of blue fluorescence under UV light (Davis et al., 1987). D. Preparation and analysis of genomic DNA from fungal cells YES broth was used to grow fungal mycelia for preparation of genomic DNA. 100 ml of YES in a 250 ml Erlenmeyer flask was inoculated with 2x106 spores of individual fungal isolates and incubated on a rotary shaker at 150 rpm at 30°C in the dark. Cultures were grown for 48 h and a phenol-chloroform protocol previously described (Skory etal., 1990) was used to isolate genomic DNA from mycelia. Restriction enzymes were purchased from 35 Boehringer Mannheim Biochemicals (Indianapolis, IN) and used according to the manufacturer's instructions. Enzyme digestion, agarose gel electrophoresis, and Southern hybridization analyses were performed according to standard procedures (Ausubel et al., 1993). Radiolabeled DNA probes were generated with a Random-Primed DNA Labeling kit (Boehringer Mannheim Biochemicals) by incorporation of [a-32P]dCTP (DuPont). E. Analysis of versicolorin A and aflatoxin production To qualitatively determine the metabolites which accumulated in transforrnant colonies, TLC analysis was performed on activated silica TLC plates ( 10 by 10 cm) using chloroform-acetone (95:5) as a solvent system. A mixture of aflatoxin B,, B,, G, and G, (Sigma) and semipurified VA were resolved on the same plate as reference standards. To identify the production of VA in ver-I gene disrupted transformants, TLC analysis was performed using benzene-acetic acid (95:5) as a solvent system. The yellow pigment that comigrated with the VA standard was scraped from the plates and dissolved in methanol or ethanol and the absorbance spectrum from 200 to 600 nm was detemrined. The spectrum was compared to previously published spectrum data for pure VA (Hamasaki et al., 1967). F. Nucleotide sequence analysis A 1.7-kb EcoRI/HindII DNA fragment containing the ver-IB gene was sequenced using eight overlapping subclones which were inserted into pBluescriptII SK(-) (Figure 6). DNA sequence analysis was performed on both strands with T3 and T7 primers by the dideoxy-chain termination method (Sanger et al., 1977) with an automated nucleotide sequencer (ABI robotic catalyst and 373A DNA sequencer) at the Plant Research Laboratory at Michigan State University. Nucleotide sequence data were analyzed with the Wisconsin Genetics Computer Group (GCG) package. A comparison between the predicted amino acid 36 Figure 6. Strategy for nucleotide sequence analysis of the 1.7-kb EcoRI-HindII fragment which contains the ver-IB gene. Several subclones were cloned into the plasmid pBluescriptII SK( -) and T3 and T7 primers were used for double-stranded sequencing. The arrows indicate the direction and extent of sequencing. The black region represents the open reading frame. B, BamHI; E, EcoRI; H, HindII; K, KpnI; M, MscI; S, SmaI. 37 Figure 6. \\ l— — _ En... PPE ”Pl \\ d _ _ _ _ ”FE ”FE Eh... — _ — A I w v. 2.: m v. .2 m 9M Ho 38 sequences of ver-IA, ver-IB, the Streptomyces coelicolor actIII gene, and the Magnaporthe grisea ThnR gene was made with Gap and aligned with Pileup software (GCG). III. RESULTS A. Restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) analysis During the isolation of the ver-I gene, several DNA fragments containing the ver-I gene were obtained by marker rescue from an A. parasiticus CS-10 aflatoxin-producing transforrnant (Skory et al., 1992). In the current study, several DNA fi'agments were subcloned fiom cosmid NorA and Ver2. The DNA fragments subcloned from cosmid NorA included a 2.1-kb EcoRI fragment (containing var-1A), a 3.2-kb EcoRI fragment (5' flanking region of the ver-IA), and a 2.5-kb SalI fragment (3' flanking region of the ver-IA). The DNA fragments subcloned from cosmid Ver2 included a 5.1-kb EcoRI fragment (containing ver-IB), and a 3.2-kb EcoRI fragment (5' flanking region of the ver-IB) (see Figure 4 for relative location of these DNA fragments). Restriction enzyme mapping was conducted on these subcloned DNA fragments and the restriction patterns were compared with restriction maps of the DNA fragments containing the cloned ver-I gene. The results indicated that the cloned ver-I gene is ver-IA. B. Identification of a duplicated chromosomal region containing the ver-I gene The 5' flanking region of ver-IA (3.2-kb EcoRI fragment) hybridized to a similar sized DNA fiagment upstream from ver-IB indicating that there is a duplicated region flanking the ver-I gene in the chromosomal DNA. To determine the extent of this duplication, Southern hybridization analysis of A. parasiticus genomic DNA was performed using DNA fragments adjacent to ver-IA (isolated from cosmid NorA) as probes (see schematic in Figure 4). At 39 least two DNA fragments hybridized with the 1.4-kb, 3.2-kb, and 2.1-kb EcoRI probes in genomic DNA digests but only one fragment was detected with the 1.9-kb EcoRI and 1.5-kb BamHI/SalI probes (Figure 7). Since only one of the restriction enzymes utilized in the analysis cut within any of the fragments used as probes (SmaI out within the 2.1-kb EcoRI fragment), the data suggested that the region of duplication extended approximately 12-kb upstream from the ver-IA and ver-IB genes. C. Nucleotide sequence analysis of ver-IB Nucleotide sequence analysis of a 1.7-kb EcoRI/HindII DNA fragment containing ver- IB was conducted on both DNA strands. The alignment of the nucleotide and predicted amino acid sequences of Per-1A and ver-IB is shown in Figure 8. The data demonstrated that these two genes share 93% identity in nucleotide sequence. The deduced amino acid sequences of the products of ver-IA and ver-IB share 97% similarity and 95% identity. A translational stop codon was identified in the coding region of ver-IB (see asterisk in Figure 8) indicating that ver-IB may encode a truncated and nonfunctional polypeptide. D. Functional analysis of the ver-I genes via recombinational inactivation and complementation To confirm gene firnction, plasmid pDV-VA (Figure 5A) was designed to disrupt either copy of the ver-I gene by homologous recombination (gene replacement). pDV-VA was linearized with XbaI and XhoI and transformed into an AFB, producing strain A. parasiticus NR-1(afl*, niaD'), in order to disrupt the ver-I gene by gene replacement through double cross-over recombination at homologous sites flanking the ver-I gene (Figure 9). Because of the similarity between the flanking regions of ver-IA and ver-IB, this disruption vector could in theory be used to disrupt both ver-I genes. In two separate experiments, a 40 Figure 7. Identification of a duplicated chromosomal region containing the ver-I genes by Southern hybridization analysis. The genomic DNA from A. parasiticus SU—l was digested with several restriction endonucleases. Digested DNA was electrophoresed in a 0.8% agarose gel, transferred to Nytran membranes and probed with DNA fiagments subcloned from cosrrrid NorA. The location of probes indicated above the blots is shown in Figure 4. B, BamHI; Bg, BgIII; E, EcoRI; P, PstI; S, SaII; Sm, SmaI; X, XbaI; XII, X7101. 41 Figure 8. An alignment of the nucleotide sequences and the deduced amino acid sequences of ver-1A and ver-IB. A stop codon within the coding region of ver-IB gene is indicated by an asterisk. 42 Figure 8. 1 1 101 101 198 201 298 301 398 401 498 500 35 598 600 35 69 698 700 69 102 798 800 102 119 898 900 119 152 998 1000 152 185 1098 1100 185 218 1198 1200 218 232 1298 1300 232 1398 1400 1498 1500 GAAIICACIICIAAAIGAIACAAGCGCGAAIAICICCGAIIAAGCCCACGIIAAGAGIAIIIICCAAGACAIGCAGGGACAGAIACAGACIICCCICAAG IIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII III IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIlllllltlllllllllllllll mmmmmmmcmmmmmmmmrmmmrmm mmmrmmmmrmnmmmmmm. . .cc lilll IIIII Illllllllllll lllllllllil ItlllllllllllllllllIIIIIIIIIIIIIII llllltllllll Illlltlll I WWWWIMITWWWMW IIIICGIICAIIAIIIIGIIIIIGGIGIGAIIGGICCAGAGCCIGCICCIAIICICAGCIICCIAIGCIIICAGCCIGCCAIAAACAAGAIGIAIIACIG llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll Illlllllllllllllllllllllllll Illlllllllll Illlllll IIIICGIICAIIAIIIIGIIIIIGGIGIGAIIGGICCAGAGCCIGCICIIAIICICAGCIICCIAIGCIIICAGCCIACCAIAAACAAGACGIAIIACIA CAIAGAAGIIIIAGGCICGCCGCCCGAIGAGCIACIGGICIICAGAIAIICGGICICCGAGGAAAGAIIIGIIIGGIGGCCAACCAICCAIAGCIGCGIA Illlllllllll Illlllllllll llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll CAIAGAAGIIIIGGGCICGCCGCCCCAIGAGCIACIGGICIICAGAIAIICGGICICCGAGGAAAGAIIIGIIIGGIGGCCAACCAICCAIAGCIGCGIA var—1A * M IAIAIGIACIACAIGCCCGIICCCCIGGGTCACCGIIIICACAGAACIACACAICAITIIGCCTCCACAAAAICICIACCAIACACGAICCCGICAGCAI lllllllll llll ll llll Illlllllllllll llllllllllllllllllllllllll Ill llllllll ll lllll I lllllll IAIAIGIACCGCAIG.ACGTICCCAIGGGICACCGTITTAACAGAACIACACAICAITTIGCCICCCIAAAGTCTCTACCCIAGACGAIAICTTCAGCAI var—18 ~ I 8 D N H R L D G K V A L V I G A G R G I G A A I A V' A L G E R G A GICGGAIAAICACCGIIIAGAIGGCAAAGIGGCCIIGGIGACAGGCGCCGGCCGCGGCAICGGIGCIGCCAICGCCGICGCCCIIGGIGAGCGCGGAGCC III II I lllllllllllllllllllllllllllll llllllllllll lllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll GICCGACAGCCACCGIIIAGAIGGCAAAGIGGCCIIGGICACAGGCGCCGGCIGCGGCAICGGIGCIGCCAICGCCGICGCCCIIGGIGAGCGCGGAGCC 8 D 8 H R L D G K V A L V I G A G C G I G A A I A. V A L G E R G A K V V V N I A H 8 R E A A E K V V E Q I K A X G I D A I A I Q A D V AAAGICGIGGIIAACIAIGCCCACICCCGCGAGGCCGCGGAGAAAGIGGIIGAACAGAICAAGGCCAAIGGIACCGAIGCIAICGCAAICCAGGCCGAIG Illllllllll lllll llllllllllllllllllllllllll llllll lllllllllllllllllllllllll llllllllllllllll llll AAAGICGIGGIGAACIACGCCCACICCCGCGAGGCCGCGGAGAAGGIGGIICAACAGAICAAGGCCAAIGGIACCGACACIAICGCAAICCAGGCGGAIG K V V V N Y A H 8 R E A A E K V V O Q I K A N G I D A I A. I Q A D V G D P E A I A K L M A E I V R H F G Y L D I V 8 8 N A G I V 8 P G ICGGGGAICCIGAGGCGACAGCGAAAIIAAIGGCGGAGACGGIGCGCCAIIIIGGCIACCIGGACAICGIGICAICGAACGCIGGAAIIGIAICGIICGG Illllllllllllllllllllllll IlllllllllIlllllllllllllllllllll lllllllllllllllll lllllllllllllllllllllll ICGGGGAICCIGAGGCGACAGCGAAGIIAAIGGCGGAGACGGIGCGCCAIIIIGGCIAACIGGACAICGIGICAICAAACGCIGGAAIIGIAICGIICGG G D P E A I A K L M A E I V R H F G ' L D I V 8 8 N A G I V 8 F G H L K D V I P E E P D R V F R V N ICACCIGAAAGACGIGACCCCAGAAQtatgaaccacagataacgcattcaaggcatatgctaaagaaaacactagGAGIIIGACAGGGTCTTCCGGGTCA Illllllllllll lllllll l llllllllllllllllllllll llllllllllllllll Illlll Illlllllll I lllllllll lllll ICACCIGAAAGACAIGACCCCTGGAQtatgaaccacagataacgcactcaaggoatatgctaataaaaacattacGAGIIIGGCCGGGICIICCAGGICA H L K D M I P G E F G R V P 0 V N I R G 0 F F V A R E A Y R H M R E G G R I I L I 8 8 N I A C V K G ACACICGIGGCCAGIICIICGIGGCGCGGGAGGCCIAICGCCAIAIGCGGGAAGGAGGCCGGAIIAICCIGACCAGCICIAACACCGCIIGCGICAAGGG llIllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllIllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll ACACICGIGGCCAGIICIICGTGGCGCGGGAGGCCIAICGCCAIAIGCGGGAAGGAGGCCGGAIIAICCIGACCAGCICIAACACCGCIIGCGICAAGGG I R G Q P F V A R E A I R H N R E G G R I I L I 8 8 N I A C V K G V P K H A. V I 8 G 8 K G A I D I F V R C M A I D C G D K K I I V N GGIACCCAAACAIGCIGIAIACICCGGIICCAAGGGGGCIAIIGACACCIIIGIICGCIGCAIGGCCAIIGACIGCGGAGACAAGAAAAICACCGIGAAI llIIIIIIlllllllllllllilllll llllllllllllll lllllllll illlllIIIlllllIlllllllllllllllllllllllll Illll GGIACCCAAACAIGCIGIAIACICCGGGICCAAGGGGGCIAICGACACCIIICIICGCIGCAIGGCCAIIGACIGCGGAGACAAGAAAAICACIGIGAAC V P K H A V Y 8 G 8 K G A I D I P L R C M A I D C G D K K I I V N A V A P G A I K I D N F L A V 8 R E I I P N G E I P I D E 0 V D E GCGGIGGCICCIGGAGCCAICAAGACIGAIAIGIIIIIGGCIGIGICGCGGGAGIAIAICCCCAAIGGIGAGACIIICACCGAIGAGCAGGIAGACGAGg II Illlllll llllllll llllllllllllllllllll IlllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllIlllllllllllll lllllll GCCGIGGCICCCGGAGCCAIIAAGACIGAIAIGIIIIIGGCAGIGICGCGGGAGIAIAICCCCAAIGGIGAGACIIICACCGAIGAGCAGGI A V A P G A I K I D N F L A V 8 R E I I P N G E I F I D E 0 V D E C A A H L 8 P L N R V G L P tcagctttccccccataaactgcgtcttgttgggttcccgcttaacgaagtcttacctag!GTGCCGCTIGGCICICTCCTITGAACCGCGIGGGCCTCC llll III I lllllllllllllllllllllll lllll Ill IlllIIIIlllllllllllllllllllllll lllll I lllllllill tcagtgttctatctataaactgcgtcttgttcccttcatacttaaggaaatcttatctag?GTGCCGCTIGGCICTCTCCICTGAACAGGGIGGGCCICC C A A w L 8 P L N R V G L P V D V A R V V 8 F L A 8 D I A E H V 8 G K I I G V D G G A I R ’ CIGIGGAIGICGCCCGGGIAGIGAGCIICCIGGCAICIGACACAGCCGAAIGGGICCGIGGAAAGAICAIIGGGGIGGAIGGIGGCGCIIIICGAIAAAC lllllll lllllllIllllllllllllllllllllI ll lllllllllllllllllllllllll lll lllllllllllllllllllll II III CIGIGGACGICGCCCGGGIAGIGAGCIICCIGGCAICAGAIGCAGCCGAAIGGGICCGIGGAAAGAIIAIICGGGIGGAIGGIGGCGCIIIICCAIGAAC V D V A R V V 8 F L A 8 D A A E H V 8 G K I I R V D G G A P P ' CIIIACCGCIAIAIACICGIGGGIGAAGIGIAIICICICGIAIIAIAAAGAGCIAGACGICGIAIIIGAIAGGAIIIGCIAGIIAAACIACAACGIAAIA lllllll lllllll l lllllllllllllll Ill llll llllllllllllll I III llllll llllllllll lllllllll III I AIIIACCGGIAIAIACACIIGGGIGAAGIGIAIIGICIIAIAIICIAAAGAGCIAGACGACAIAICAGAIAGGGIIIGCIAGIIGAACIACAACIIAACA IAACGICIACIGCICCCAGGIAGCGGGGAAAAAGACCIIGIAIAIAIGCIIGAAAACCIIICACAIIACACIAAICACGGIAACIICAIAIAICCAAIGC lllllllIllllllllllllllllllll llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll IAACGICIACIGCICCCAGGIAGCGGGGGAAAAGACCIIGIAIAIAIGCIIGAAAACCIIICAIAIIACACIAAICACGGIAACIICAIAIAICCAAIGC 100 100 197 200 297 300 397 400 497 499 34 597 599 34 68 697 699 68 101 797 799 101 118 897 899 118 151 997 999 151 184 1097 1099 184 217 1197 1199 217 231 1297 1299 231 262 1397 1399 262 1497 1499 1597 1599 43 Figure 9. Schematic representation of the disruption of ver-IA by plasmid pDV-VA (gene replacement). The black boxes located below the restriction map of a putative recombinant clone are the predicted DNA fragments which would be observed using probe 1 and probe 2 in Southern hybridization analysis. B, BamHI; H, HindIII; P, PstI; Sa, SacI; S, SphI; Xb, XbaI; X, X7101. u a fix 0.3 3! 1.5 a» a. 3x «.3 a a so. as x a r 82.. l Q8: « sea I 1g “ u g m n. m a 3.: x a m <32. .832»... <39. 82.2% .5. ad 1 a 3v. 1.! L L 3! ad. 0 n <38. <20 °_E°=°m 1— ./////V/////////7////////////////////////A — — m I m x n. m .<>.>o.: 28mm... £233.55 I? ME 5?. ONE x Figure 9. 45 total of 250 transformant colonies were generated. One clone, A. parasiticus VAD-102, was identified which lost the ability to produce aflatoxin but did accumulate a yellow pigment (presumptive VA) based on an initial screen on CAM. TLC analysis of cell extracts confirmed that VAD-102 did not produce AFB, or G, but instead accumulated VA (Figure 10). In an attempt to identify the genetic recombination events which occurred in VAD- 102, Southern blot analysis was conducted by cutting genomic DNA extracted from single spore isolates of VAD-102 with four different combinations of restriction enzymes : (1) BamHI, (2) P511, (3) P511 plus SacI, or (4) HindIII plus SphI. The Southern blots were probed separately with radiolabelled probes 1 or 2 shown in Figure 9. Based on the schematic (Figure 9) indicating the disruption of ver-IA, when genomic DNA was cut with BamHI and probed with probe 1, the wild-type 2.9-kb BamHI fiagment would shifi to a 3.6-kb BamHI fragment. IfPstI was used to cut the genomic DNA and probed with probe 1, the wild-type 4.4-kb PstI fragment would be replaced by a 6.2-kb PstI fragment. In the same way, if the genomic DNA was digested with PstI plus SacI and probed with probe 2, the wild-type 4.4- kb PstI fragment would be replaced by a 2.4-kb PstI-SacI fragment. The wild-type 3.3-kb SphI-HindIII fragment would be replaced by a 2.8-kb fragment when genomic DNA was digested with SphI and HindIII and probed with probe 2. The Southern blots demonstrated that the wild type ver-IA gene fragment was replaced by the predicted disrupted DNA fiagment with all restriction enzymes used in the analysis (Figure 11). These data indicated that the ver-IA but not ver-IB gene was disrupted by gene replacement in VAD-102. However, additional DNA fragments not predicted for a simple disruption event also hybridized to the probes (Figure 11). The stronger hybridization signal (according to the 46 VA > AFB, , l l Figure 10. TLC analysis of the metabolites of A. parasiticus VAD-102. Aflatoxin B and G mixture (lane A) and VA purified from A. parasiticus ATCC 36537 (lane V) were used as standards. The chloroform—extract of mycelia and growth media from A. parasiticus VAD- 102 (lane 2) was compared with that from the AFB, producing strain A. parasiticus NR- 1(lane 1). Solvent system : chlorofomr-acetone (95:5). .‘8’ . \III\ ((A1 {III/{‘11 47 Figure 11. Southern hybridization analysis to confirm disruption of the ver—I gene. Genomic DNAS isolated fi'om A. parasiticus NR-l (lane N), A. parasiticus VAD-102 (lane 1), and a transforrnant which still produced aflatoxins (lane 2) were digested with BamHI (blot a), PstI (blot b), PstI plus SacI (blot c), or HindIII plus SphI (blot d) and analyzed using standard procedures. Blot a and b were hybridized with probe 1 as indicated in Figure 9. Blot c and d were hybridized with probe 2. DNA fiagments designated A, the DNA fiagment containing ver-IA; B, the DNA fragment containing ver-IB. Stars indicate DNA fragments that are derived from gene replacement disruption of ver-IA. DNA size standards are HindIII-digested lambda DNA in kilobases. 48 intensity) of these additional fragments suggested that multiple integration of the disruption vector may have occurred in the genomic DNA. Southern hybridization analysis of these same DNAs using the niaD gene as a probe showed that the illegitimate recombination did not occur at the niaD gene locus (data not shown). Because multiple integrations of pDV- VA occurred, we could not rule out the possibility that loss of AFB, synthesis in VAD-102 was due to an event other than disruption of ver-IA. To solve this problem, an alternative hypothesis was proposed : if the accumulation of VA in strain VAD-102 is caused by disruption of the ver-IA gene, aflatoxin production will be restored after the functional ver-IA gene is put back into the genomic DNA. In order to transform the ver-IA gene back into strain VAD-102, another selectable marker, ben‘, was used in firngal transformation to avoid generation of auxotrophic mutations in the VAD-102 strain. The ben’ gene is a mutated allele of the normal B-tubulin gene and confers resistance to the fungicide benomyl. The gene has been cloned in our lab from a benomyl resistant mutant of A. parasiticus (Wu et al., 1996). Strain VAD-102 was transformed with pVer-Ben (Figure 5B) containing ver-IA and ben’. Nine benomyl resistant transformants were obtained. TLC analysis of cell extracts of 5 transformants (A. parasiticus VAD-BV l to 5) demonstrated that they were able to produce aflatoxin although they still accumulated VA (Figure 12). Based on Southern hybridization analysis of their genomic DNAs, the five aflatoxin-producing transformants all contained at least one copy of the wild- type ver-IA gene (2.1-kb EcoRI fiagment; see Figure 13). It was difficult to identify the site of integration of pVer-Ben in these transformants because the recipient strain already harbored multiple truncated ver-IA sequences. The different location and copy number of the wild-type ver-IA gene in the aflatoxin-producing transformants may explain different 49 VA» AFB, > AFG, > AFVANV123456789 Figure 12. TLC analysis of the metabolites of transformants obtained by transformation of A. parasiticus VAD-102 with pVer-Ben. The chloroform-extract from A. parasiticus NR-l (lane 1‘0 and A. parasiticus VAD-102 (lane V) were resolved on the same plate with those of the transformants A. parasiticus VAD-BV 1 to 9 (lanes 1 to 9). Aflatoxin B and G mixture (lane AF) and VA purified fi'om A. parasiticus ATCC 36537 (lane VA) are used as standards. Solvent system : chloroform-acetone (95:5). Fr D\! t.. if" -‘I -\.€‘§" III .( If 50 Figure 13. Southern hybridization analysis of A. parasiticus VAD-102 transformed with pVer-Ben. Genomic DNAs isolated from A. parasiticus NR-l (lane N), A. parasiticus VAD- 102 (lane V), and transformants (lanes 1 to 9) were digested with EcoRI and probed with a 0.8-kb SmaI/EcoRI DNA fragment containing ver-IA and analyzed by standard procedures. DNA fragments designated A, the DNA fragment containing ver-IA; B, the DNA fragment containing ver-IB. DNA size standards are HindIII-digested lambda DNA in kilobases. 51 levels of AFB, and VA observed. The remaining four benomyl resistant transformants (VAD- BV 6 to 9) did not produce detectable AFB, (Figure 12) nor did they contain wild type copies of ver-IA (Figure 13). These data suggested that disruption of ver-IA in VAD-102 accounted for the accumulation of the pathway intermediate VA and that a wild type ver-IA gene could complement this genetic block in the disruptant strain. IV. DISCUSSION The data confirm that ver-IA is directly involved in the conversion of VA to ST in AFB, biosynthesis in A. parasiticus SU—l. Of the two copies of ver-I present in this strain, only ver-IA is functional. A nonsense mutation occurred in the coding region of ver-IB which likely resulted in synthesis of a truncated polypeptide with no function. The direct involvement of a homolog of ver-IA in ST biosynthesis in A. nidulans was also confirmed by disruption of the .9th gene which was cloned based on sequence homology to ver-IA (Keller et al., 1994). Disruption ofsth led to a block in ST production and accumulation of VA. In this study, a linearized plasmid was used to disrupt ver-IA by gene replacement. A study performed by Tatebayashi et al. (1994), which analyzed the DNA fragments generated by illegitimate recombination in Schizosaccharomyces pombe, demonstrated that linearized DNA can recircularize and integrate into multiple sites in genomic DNA through homologous or nonhomologous recombination. These data may help explain the fact that not only was ver-IA disrupted by gene replacement but also the dismption plasmid recircularized and integrated (apparently multiple copies based on hybridization signal intensity) at one or several loci. Recently, transcript mapping together with gene complementation and inactivation 52 experiments in A. parasiticus showed that the aflatoxin pathway genes pksA,fas—1A, nor-1, aflR, norA, ver-IA, and omtA are clustered in one linkage group (Trail et al., 1995; Yu et al., 1995). Based on the results obtained in this study, it appears that part of the gene cluster is duplicated in A. parasiticus SU-l. At least three previously identified genes, ver-IA, norA, and cle, are located in this duplicated region. To date the presence of only one copy of any of these genes has been demonstrated in A. flavus (Skory, 1992). The duplication of a portion of the gene cluster in A. parasiticus (especially the duplication of one of the pathway regulators) but not inA. flavus may help explain the observation that nearly all A. parasiticus strains isolated produce high levels of aflatoxins, whereas many A. flavus isolates (up to 40% or more) produce no aflatoxins (Bennett and Papa, 1988; Cleveland and Bhatnagar, 1991). The conversion of VA to ST in Aspergillus is a complex reaction which contains at least 5 enzymatic steps including deoxygenation, Baeyer-Villiger oxidation, lactone cleavage and rearrangement, oxidative decarboxylation, and methylation (Bhatnagar et al., 1992; Dutton, 1988; see Figure 14). The enzymes that catalyze the conversion of VA to ST have not yet been identified. The lack of purified enzyme activities together with the absence of identified intermediates between VA and ST make it difficult to elucidate the exact function of the ver-I gene. Nucleotide sequence analysis of the ver-I gene suggested that it may encode a ketoreductase (Skory et al., 1992). A comparison of the predicted amino acid sequence of ver-I with the published polypeptide sequence for the Streptomyces coelicolor actIII gene (Hallam et al., 1988), which encodes a ketoreductase associated with biosynthesis of the polyketide actinorhodin, demonstrated a significant level of identity (~3 0%) between these proteins (Figure 15). Based on this result, the Ver—l protein was proposed to be responsible for a deoxygenation reaction. Unfortunately, the timing of deoxygenation in 53 CHOW Wm (10”),ng flfldation 0” ° 0“ OH o OH Meow» m... 0 0 H20 B.V. oxidation 13:3;23283 311d 01 0 0'1 0 deoxygenation H20 lactone cleavage and oxidative rearrangement decarboxylation C02 oxidative decarboxylation C02 0 O (DMST) (ST) Figure 14. Proposed schemes for the enzymatic conversion of versicolorin A (VA) to sterigmatocystin (ST). 6—deoxy VA, 6-deoxyversicolorin A; DMST, demethyl- sterigmatocystin. 54 Figure 15. A comparison of the deduced amino acid sequences of ver-IA, ver-IB, Streptomyces coelicolor actIII (actIII; Hallam er al., 1988), and Magnaporthe grisea ThnR (ThnR; Vidal-Cros et al., 1994). The in-frame stop codon within the ver-IB polypeptide is indicated by an asterisk. Black squares represent amino acid identity. White squares represent amino acid similarity. 55 Figure 15. er-IB. 17]]HR ide is 856111 56 conversion of VA to ST is still ambiguous because no putative intermediates have been isolated from aflatoxin producing strains. 6-deoxyversicolorin A (6-deoxy VA), however, has been identified to be a metabolite of Aspergillus versicolor which produces ST (Elsworthy et al., 1970). This prompted us to propose that the Ver-l protein is involved in the deoxygenation of VA to form 6-deoxy VA. In support of this proposed scheme, a polyhydroxynaphthalene reductase (T4HN reductase) involved in melanin biosynthesis in Magnaporthe grisea was recently purified to homogeneity (Vidal-Cros et al., 1994). This reductase displays 66% identity and 82% similarity with the deduced arrrino acid sequence of the ver-IA gene product (Figure 15). The dehydroxylation reaction in part catalyzed byM grisea T4HN reductase is entirely analogous to the proposed deoxygenation of VA (Figure 16). The other analogous reaction is the reduction of emodin to chrysophanol at an early stage of the biosynthesis of ergochromes, fungal pigments produced by Claviceps purpurea. This conversion, mediated by NADPH, is believed to consist of two steps, reduction and dehydration (Ichinose et al., 1993). Based on these observations, we hypothesize that' VA is processed by two successively operating enzymes, the product of the ver-I gene and a dehydratase, to form 6-deoxy VA (Figure 16). Before completely understanding the conversion of VA to ST, however, it is necessary to clone several other genes involved in this complex reaction. Keller et al. (1995) have isolated a second gene, stcS, involved in the conversion of VA to ST in A. nidulans. stcS is located within 2-kb ofsth (ver-IA homolog) in the ST gene cluster. The close spatial relationship between these VA associated genes could lead to firture studies focused on the isolation and characterization of other genes involved in the conversion of VA to ST in order to more clearly understand this process. 57 (1) MELANIN OH OH OH OH REDUCI'ASE DEHYDRATASE 0H,“.— 0,, OHJiIOOHl 3,,” T4HN C)(‘l') SCYTALONE T3HN (2) CYNODONTIN OH O OH OH O DEOXYGENASE GOO — —-> WQOO CH3 OH O EMODIN CHRYSOPHANOL (3)AFLATOXIN OH O VER-I OH O OUCF W 000 O VERSICOLORIN A GDEOXWERSICOLORIN A Figure 16. Proposed Ver-l protein activity in a two-step dehydroxylation reaction (reaction 3) derived from analogous reactions in melanin (reaction 1; Vidal-Cros er al., 1994) and cynodontin (reaction 2; lchinose et al., 1993) biosynthesis. T4HN : 1,3,6,8- tetrahydroxynathalene; T3HN 21,3,8-trihydroxynaphthalene. CHAPTER 3 REGULATION OF VER-I GENE EXPRESSION IN FUNGAL CELLS I. INTRODUCTION Understanding the process of aflatoxin gene expression is one essential step toward elucidation of the molecular mechanisms which regulate aflatoxin biosynthesis. Two useful indicators for gene expression are the pattern of accumulation of the transcripts (mRN A) and proteins encoded by aflatoxin genes. Previous studies demonstrated that the appearance of several aflatoxin metabolic enzymes (Anderson and Green, 1994; Cleveland et al., 1987; Lin and Anderson, 1992) and the accumulation of nor-1, ver-I, and omtA transcripts (Skory et al., 1993; Yu et al., 1993) coincide with the cessation of exponential growth of the fiingus and the onset of aflatoxin production. In the current study, the expression of the ver-I gene was monitored by detection of the gene product, the Ver-l protein. Since ver-I is directly involved in aflatoxin biosynthesis, it was hypothesized that the accumulation of the Ver-l protein should parallel AFB1 accumulation. Two complementary methods, batch fermentation analysis and nutritional shift assay, were performed to address this hypothesis. Because an enzyme activity assay of the Ver-l protein was unavailable, a polyclonal antibody was generated for Western blot detection of the native Ver-l protein in A. parasiticus. To generate the anti-Ver-l antibody, a ver-IA cDNA was expressed in Escherichia coli using 58 59 the vector pMAL-c2. The maltose-binding protein/Ver-l filSiOIl protein produced by E. coli was used to generate polyclonal antibodies against the Ver-l protein. After immunoaflinity purification, an anti-Ver-l antibody was obtained to specifically recognize the Ver-l protein (~28-kDa) in fimgi by Western blot analysis. The specific anti-Ver-l antibody was also used to study the regulation of Ver-l protein accumulation in fiingal colonies grown on solid media. A temporal and spatial pattern of Ver-l protein accumulation was observed using Western blot analysis of proteins extracted from different areas of the fungal colony. This observation was confirmed using the ver- 1/GUS reporter strain (Wu, 1995) by monitoring GUS activity (B-glucuronidase). The ver- 1/GUS reporter strains were also applied to study the expression of the ver-I gene in fungal mycelia using chromogenic and fluorescent substrates. H. MATERIALS AND METHODS A. Strains and plasmids A. parasiticus NRRL 5862(SU-1; ATCC 56775) was used as a wild-type aflatoxin- producing strain in the investigation of Ver-l protein accumulation. A. parasiticus VAD-102, in which the ver-IA gene was disrupted, was used as a negative control for Ver-l protein detection in Western blot analyses. A. parasiticus VAD-BV 1 to 5, five isolates of A. parasiticus VAD-102 which were transformed with a wild-type ver-IA gene, served as positive controls for Ver—l protein detection. Several ver-I/GUS reporter strains were used in the analysis of Ver-l protein accumulation in fungal colonies and mycelia. A. parasiticus le)6-6 No. l and No. 4, in which the functional ver-I promoter/GUS fusion construct was integrated at the ver-I locus, were used as positive reporter strains. A. parasiticus pHD4-4 60 No. 3, in which a GUS construct without the ver-I promoter was integrated at the niaD gene locus, was used as a negative reporter strain (Wu, 1995). The pMAL-c2 vector (New England Biolabs) was used for expression of the maltose-binding protein (MBP)/Ver-1 fusion protein in Escherichia coli BL21 (Novagen Inc. Madison, Wisconsin). B. Generation of polyclonal antibodies against the Ver-l protein The pMAL protein fusion and purification system (New England Biolabs) was used for Ver-l protein production. The EcoRI/M101 ver-IA cDNA fragment (kindly supplied by Dr. J efl' Cary, USDA-ARS, New Orleans, LA) was inserted between the EcoRI and SaII sites in the polylinker of the pMAL-c2. This vector was then cut with EcoRI, treated with Klenow enzyme, and religated to generate the correct reading frame fused with malE which encodes the MBP. Expression of the MBP/Ver-l fusion protein in E. coli was induced by adding IPTG (isopropyl B-D-thiogalactopyranoside) during active growth. The MBP/Ver-l fusion protein was purified from the E. coli crude extracts using an amylose-resin column according to the manufacturer's instructions. The purified MBP/Ver-l filSiOI‘l protein [400 ug in 200 pl phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), pH 7.2] was mixed with 200 pl TiterMax adjuvant (Sigma) and used to immunize two rabbits to generate polyclonal antibodies. The rabbits were boosted with the same preparation of antigen at 28 days after the first injection. Sera were collected at 28, 58, and 65 days and the antibody titer was determined by ELISA using preimmune sera as controls. Microtiter wells were coated with MBP/Ver-l proteins and then blocked with 3% BSA in PBS. After washing the plates with PBS containing 0.2% (v/v) tween 20 (PBS-Tween), the diluted serum was added and incubated for 60 min at 37°C. The plate was washed 6 times with PBS-Tween and the alkaline phosphatase conjugated goat anti- rabbit IgG was added to each well. After incubation for 60 min at 37°C, the plate was washed 61 6 times with PB S-Tween and the bound phosphatase activity was determined by adding 50 pl substrate solution consisting of 0.4 mM p-nitrophenyl phosphate, 10 mM diethanolamine, and 0.5 mM MgCl2 in H20 (pH 9.5). The reaction was stopped by adding 50 pl stopping solution containing 0.1 M EDTA in H20. Absorbance was read at 405 nm. Titers were defined as the highest dilution of serum resulting in absorbance greater than the control. The IgG antibody fraction was purified by precipitation of the antiserum with 33% ammonium sulfate. After redissolving in PBS, the antibodies were passed through an affinity column in which the MBP and E. coli proteins were conjugated to a CNBr-activated Sepharose gel (Sigma). The antibodies which passed through the column were referred to as anti-Ver—l antibodies. C. Batch fermentation analysis Conidia (2x106) of A. parasiticus SU-l were inoculated in 250 ml Erlenmeyer flasks containing 100 ml YES broth (2% yeast extract, 6% sucrose; pH 5.8). The cultures were incubated at 30°C (in the dark) in an orbital shaker (150 rpm). Flasks were removed at appropriate time points after inoculation for the analysis of mycelial dry weight, aflatoxin concentration, and protein extraction. D. Nutritional shift assay The nutritional shift assay was performed as previously described (Skory et al., 1993). Glucose-mineral salts medium (GMS), which is able to induce aflatoxin production, and peptone-mineral salts medium (PMS), a non-aflatoxin—supporting medium, were used to grow mycelia in this assay. Conidia (2x107) of A. parasiticus SU—l were inoculated in 500 ml PMS and grown for 65 h at 30°C (in the dark) in an orbital shaker (150 rpm). The mycelia were harvested and equally distributed into fresh GMS or PMS media (30 ml for each sample). 62 The mycelia were collected at different time points (up to 48 h) after nutritional shift for protein extraction and the aflatoxin concentration in the grth media was measured. E. Protein extraction and Western blot analysis Mycelia for protein extraction were ground in liquid nitrogen using a mortar and pestle, suspended in TSA (2 mM Tris-CV40 mM NaCl/0.025% NaN3; pH 8.0) buffer containing 1.0 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (PMSF), and centrifirged at 20,000 x g for 15 min. The protein concentration in the supernatant was determined with the Bio-Rad Protein Assay kit (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA) based on the Bradford method (Bradford, 1976). 50-100 pg of protein from the supernatant were separated by electrophoresis (12 % SDS-PAGE), transferred to PVDF membrane, and probed with anti- Ver-l antibodies. ARad-Free chemiluminescent detection kit (Schleicher & Schuell, Keene, NH) was utilized to detect antibodies bound to proteins. F. Analysis of mycelial dry weight and aflatoxin concentration Fungal mycelia were harvested by filtration through Miracloth and the dry weight was measured after lyophilization or after complete drying at 70°C. The AFB1 concentration in the filtrate was determined by an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) described by Pestka (1988) with AFBl monoclonal antibodies (kindly provided by Dr. J. Pestka, Michigan State University). G. Analysis of the accumulation of the Ver-l protein in a fungal colony Plate cultures were grown by inoculating conidiospores of A. parasiticus SU-l onto the center of Petri dishes which contained YES. When the colonies had grown up to a point where well-defined sectors (different morphology in central, middle, and peripheral parts of the colony) could be observed (3 to 6 days of incubation), they were cut in concentric zones 63 with a sterile scalpel. Mycelia from each concentric zone were used for protein extraction and the same amount of protein was resolved by gel electrophoresis (12% SDS-PAGE), and the Ver-l protein was analyzed by Western blot analysis. In an alternative protocol, the ver-I/GUS reporter strains were grown the same way on solid YES medium. Instead of cutting out the mycelia, the colony was overlaid with a 1.5 % agar solution containing 0.5 mg/ml X-gluc (5-bromo-4-chloro-3 -indolyl B-D-glucuronide) and the plates were incubated at room temperature for 4 hr or until the blue color was well developed. H. Analysis of the expression of the ward gene in mycelia A modified method for fungal slide culture (Harris, 1986) was used in this experiment. The 1.5 % water agar was poured into Petri dishes and allowed to solidify. A 22-mm2 cover glass was centered on the agar. One block of solid YES agar (5 to 8 mmz) was placed on the center of the cover glass. The conidia of ver-I/GUS reporter strains were inoculated on each side of YES agar followed by placement of the second cover slip on top of the nutrient block. The slide cultures were incubated at 30°C from 24 to 65 hr (in the dark). After taking apart the assemblage, the cover glass with mycelia attached to it was immersed in liquid YES containing 0.5 mg/ml X-gluc and incubated for 4 hr. The preparation was then examined by a Nikon Labophot microscope for distribution of the blue color. A FITC-conjugated GUS substrate (CnFDGlcU; Molecular Probes, Inc.) was also used to replace the X-gluc in this experiment, and the GUS activity was represented by the green fluorescence. 64 III.RESULTS A. Specificity of anti-Ver—l antibodies Previous data from nucleotide sequence analysis indicated that the ver-IA gene encodes a polypeptide composed of 262 amino acids (Skory et al., 1992). The deduced molecular mass of the Ver-l protein is 28-kDa. The specificity of the anti—Ver-l antibodies raised against MBPNer-l fusion protein was tested by Western blot analyses. The ability of this antibody preparation to detect the native Ver-l protein in protein extracts of A. parasiticus NRRL 5862, a wild-type aflatoxin-producing strain, and A. parasiticus VAD-102, a non-aflatoxin-producing strain which accumulates versicolorin A (VA) was measured. Since the ver-IA gene was disrupted in strain VAD-102, it was predicted that the Ver-l protein would not be present in the protein extract. A 28-kDa protein was detected in the protein extract of wild-type strain but not in that of strain VAD-102 (Figure 17A). In the study described in Chapter 2, the ver-IA gene was transformed into strain VAD-102. Of the 9 transformants analyzed, 5 (transformants VAD-BV 1 to 5) restored ver- 1A gene function and aflatoxin production. Protein extracts of these 9 transformants were employed in the Western blot analysis using anti-Ver-l antibodies as the probe (Figure 17B). The data demonstrated that isolates which received the ver-IA gene and were restored in AFBl production (transformants VAD-BV 1 to 5), regained the production of the 28-kDa protein. These data confirmed that the anti-Ver-l antibodies specifically recognize the native Ver-l protein in A. parasiticus. Because of this specificity, the anti-Ver-l antibodies raised against MBP/Ver-l firsion protein were used to analyze Ver—l protein accumulation. 65 Figure 17. Western blot analysis to measure the specificity of anti-Ver-l antibodies. Proteins were extracted from mycelia afler 60 - 72 hr growth in YES media. 50 - 100 pg of protein were resolved by gel electrophoresis (12% SDS-PAGE), transferred to PVDF membrane, and probed with anti-Ver-l antibodies raised against a MBP/Ver-l firsion protein. (A) Western blot analysis of cell extracts from A. parasiticus NR1 (lane 1) and VAD-102 (lane 2). (B) Western blot analysis of cell extracts fiom A. parasiticus NR1 (lane N), A. parasiticus VAD- 102 (lane V), and transformants (lane 1 to 9) obtained by transformation of VAD-102 with a plasmid containing the wild type ver—IA gene. Transformants 1 to 5 (lane 1 to 5) are aflatoxin producing strains. Transformants 6 to 9 (lane 6 to 9) are non-aflatoxin producing strains. The molecular mass of marker proteins is indicated on the left of the blots A and B. Figure 17. 66 67 B. Accumulation of the Ver-l protein in liquid cultures of A. parasiticus Two complementary experiments, batch fermentation analysis and nutritional shift assay, were performed to determine the relationship between Ver-l protein accumulation and aflatoxin accumulation in A. parasiticus. In batch fermentation analysis, A. parasiticus NRRL 5862 was grown in YES medium for 5 days (conditions which induced aflatoxin production). The growth of the mycelia and aflatoxin production were measured at appropriate time intervals (Figure 18A). AFB, was first detected 36 hr after inoculation and accumulated rapidly between 36 hr and 60 hr. The rate of AFB, accumulation decreased after 60 hr. Western blot analysis (Figure 18B) revealed that the Ver-l protein was not detected until 36 hr after inoculation, at approximately the same time as AFB, was detected. The quantity of the Ver-l protein reached its highest level at 60 hr and decreased thereafter. These data indicated that the timing and rate of AFB, accumulation corresponded very well to the timing and rate of accumulation of the Ver-l protein. A nutritional shift assay was conducted to determine if the relationship between AFB, accumulation and Ver-l protein accumulation was observed under a different set of conditions which induce AFB, synthesis. AFB, and the Ver-l protein were not detected during initial growth of the wild-type strain in PMS medium (non-AFB] inducing conditions) (Figure 19). After transferring the mycelia to fresh PMS and GMS media, AFB, was first detectable at 12 hr in GMS medium (AFB, inducing conditions) and increased up to 32 hr. On the contrary, no detectable AFB, accumulation occurred up to 48 hr after the shift to fresh PMS medium (Figure 19A). Western blot analysis (Figure 198) showed that the Ver-l protein could be clearly detected at 12 hr and the quantity peaked at approximately 36 hr after the shift to GMS. The Ver-l protein was not detected in mycelia shifted to fresh PMS. 68 Figure 18. Batch fermentation analysis of Ver—l protein accumulation in A. parasiticus SU- 1. (A) Mycelial growth (dry weight) and aflatoxin production (measured by ELISA) after inoculation of conidiospores in YES media. (B) Western blot analysis of proteins extracted from mycelia from 24 to 120 h after inoculation in YES media using similar methods as in Figure 17. The molecular mass of marker proteins is indicated on the left of the blot. 69 €569: .833 cozmhcoocoo 5568.2 0 w 1 8 6 4 2 0 n u d - - - 140 m m o O 0 0 4| 1 Time (hr) + Myeollal Dry Weight 35 - -o-Aflatoxln Concentration h t- n - b Li 0 o. o. 5. o. 5. o 5. o. 4 3 2 2 1 1 0 0 a 68 mod 3925 to 6:85 n w. . n A 70 Figure 19. Nutritional shift assay for the identification of Ver-l protein accumulation in A. parasiticus SU-l. (A) Aflatoxin accumulation in GMS and PMS media after nutritional shift (measured by ELISA). (B) Western blot analysis of proteins extracted from mycelia grown in GMS (G) and PMS (P) before (P at 0 h) and after nutritional shift. The molecular mass of marker proteins is indicated on the right of the blot. 71 A. 6 5 4 3 2 1 =83... :ozfiucoocoo 5.83.2 0 TONI Time ( hr) 111353 72 These data confirm that Ver-l protein accumulation correlates positively with AFB, accumulation in the wild-type aflatoxin-producing strain. C. Accumulation of the Ver-l protein in a fungal colony Three concentric zones (center, middle, and periphery; see Figure 20), which differ in their morphology, could be clearly observed in colonies grown for 72 to 144 hr on solid YES medium. The central zone bears abundant pigmented conidia. The middle zone contains more aerial hyphae with scattered conidia. The peripheral zone may be divided into two parts, an outer, thin hyphal network border and a region where the hyphal network is piled up, with the formation of aerial hyphae. The width of these three zones increased constantly as grth proceeded. Colonies from 72 to 144 hr growth were cut in concentric zones and the Ver-l protein was detemiined by Western blot analysis of proteins extracted from each zone (Figure 21). The data indicated that (1) the central part of the colony contains less Ver- 1 protein than the middle and peripheral parts, and (2) the Ver-l protein concentration in each concentric zone changed at different growth stages. In other words, there are spatial and temporal expression patterns of the ver—I gene in a fungal colony. A ver-I/GUS reporter strain, pHD6-6 transformant 1, showed the same morphology as the wild-type aflatoxin-producing strain when grown on YES media. GUS expression in pHD6-6 transformant 1 had previously been shown to be under the control of the ver-I promoter (Wu, 1995) and thus could be used to monitor ver-I gene expression. By overlaying a colony of the pHD6-6 transformant 1 with agar containing X-gluc, it was observed that the blue staining was more intense in the peripheral part and the border between the peripheral and middle parts of the colony (Figure 22). These data confirmed the observation in Western blot analysis that the central part of the colony has a lower Ver-l 73 Figure 20. The morphology of a fungal colony grown on solid YES media. Conidiospores of Aspergillus parasiticus SU-l were inoculated onto the center of the medium and grown for 120 hr at 30°C in the dark. Three concentric zones with different morphologies were designated C, central zone; M, middle zone; P, peripheral zone. 74 Figure 21. Western blot analysis of the proteins extracted from three concentric zones in fungal colonies. Plate cultures were grown by inoculating conidiospores of A. parasiticus SU-l onto the center of Petri dishes (solid YES) and incubated for 72 to 144 hr. Central (C), middle (M), and peripheral (P) parts of the colonies were cut in concentric zones with a sterile scalpel and used for protein extraction. 50 pg of protein were resolved by gel electrophoresis (12% SDS-PAGE), transferred to PVDF membrane, and probed with anti-Verl antibodies. 75 Figure 22. Analysis of ver-I promoter activity in a fungal colony using the ver-I/GUS reporter strain. Conidiospores of Aspergillus parasiticus pHD6-6 transformant 1 were inoculated onto the center of the YES medium and incubated for 120 hr at 30°C in the dark. The colony was overlaid with a 1.5 % agar solution containing 0.5 mg/ml X—gluc (5-bromo-4- chloro-3-indolyl B-D-glucuronide) and the plates were incubated at room temperature for 4 hr. The blue staining indicates the location of GUS activity. 76 protein concentration. D. Expression of the ver-I gene in mycelia Using a slide culture method, the structure of fungi including vegetative mycelia, conidiophores, and conidiospores could be easily observed by bright field microscopy. For reference purposes, the structure of a typical conidiophore of Aspergillus is shown in Figure 23. Using pHD6-6 transformant 1 as the reporter strain, it was found that X-gluc staining was very weak in the 24 hr culture and relatively strong in the 48 and 64 hr cultures. The blue staining was well distributed in the vegetative mycelia (Figure 24A). In the conidiophore, the blue staining seemed to concentrate in the vesicle or the area near it (Figure 24D and E). It was also observed that the older hyphae had weaker blue staining than the younger hyphae. The same phenomenon was also observed when the fluorescent GUS substrate was used (Figure 24F and G). IV. DISCUSSION We have successfully generated polyclonal antibodies to detect the native Ver-l protein in A. parasiticus. The results suggested that the antibodies generated against proteins expressed in E. coli possessed a high degree of specificity in detecting native Ver-l proteins in A. parasiticus. The model we developed here for raising polyclonal antibodies to detect the aflatoxin proteins is very usefiil especially when the enzymatic activity of a protein involved in aflatoxin biosynthesis cannot be identified and hence cannot be purified. The protein encoded by the ver-] gene provides a good example. The enzymatic activity of the Ver-l protein has not been identified although the ver-I gene has been confirmed to be directly involved in aflatoxin biosynthesis. 77 -ooacm». ~. 5 g g 8 g C ,, g ‘3 © ,. i; 9 . . o 2 camera 9 . C 3 9 e . .. . PHAUOE . ‘ A A.’ e \ ' ‘I . , “EMA VE9CLE \ STALK FOOT CELL VEGETA‘IWE CELL J k /I I ’I’ Figure 23. The structure of a typical conidiophore of Aspergillus. (Timberlake, 1993) 78 Figure 24. Microscopic images from the analysis of ver-I promoter activity in mycelia using the ver-I/GUS reporter strain. The fungi were grown on a cover glass for 48 or 65 hr using the slide culture method. The mycelia were stained by immersing the cover glass in liquid YES containing 0.5 mg/ml X-gluc (picture A - E) or C,,FDGlcU (picture F - H) and incubated for 4 hr. The preparation was then examined by a Nikon Labophot microscope for distribution of the blue color (bright field) or green fluorescence (UV). (A) A. parasiticus pHD6-6 transformant 1 incubated on YES media for 48hr. x400. (B) A. parasiticus SU-l incubated on YES media for 48 hr (negative control). x400. (C) A. parasiticus pHD6-6 transformant 1 incubated on YES media for 48 hr (without X-gluc staining). x400. (D) and (F) A conidiophore (without conidia] head) of A. parasiticus pHD6-6 transformant 1 incubated on YES media for 48 hr. x400. (E) and (G) A conidiophore with conidia] head of A. parasiticus pHD6-6 transformant 1 incubated on YES media for 65 hr. x400. (H) A. parasiticus SU-l incubated on YES media for 65 hr (negative control). x100. tic-n Figure 24. A. Figure 24. (cont’d). D. 80 I“‘{‘ {1’ I ‘fl‘l‘ll‘l ( I. .( 1"! (‘I 1“ ( ' I“ I f! (I. I] ll 82 Figure 24. (cont’d) H. 83 It was not possible to investigate Ver-l protein accumulation in A. parasiticus until specific antibodies against the Ver-l protein were generated in this study. The batch fermentation analysis demonstrated that the accumulation of the Ver-l protein is consistent with a pattern predicted for a protein involved in secondary metabolism. These data indicated that the ver-I gene is expressed near the end of trophophase ( approximately 36 hr after inoculation in YES medium) when aflatoxins begin to accumulate. The positive correlation between ver-I gene expression and aflatoxin accumulation was fiirther confirmed in the nutritional shift assay in which Ver-l protein accumulated to significant levels only in the medium (GMS) which supported aflatoxin biosynthesis. These data were consistent with our previous observation that the timing of ver-I RNA transcript accumulation corresponded to the timing of aflatoxin accumulation (Skory et al., 1993). To date, studies on the regulation of secondary metabolism are often based on submerged, agitated, and batch liquid cultures which clearly separate the trophophase and idiophase of fungal growth (Bu’Lock et al., 1965). This model system, however, could potentially perturb the normal metabolic and physiological development of fungi and mask functionally significant information (Campbell et al., 1981). In nature, the aspergilli grow on solid substrates and grth is far fiom homogeneous. In search of firnctional information on regulation of secondary metabolism, solid culture is a closer approximation to the natural growth conditions of fungi. In this study, Ver-l protein accumulation was measured in a fungal colony grown on solid media. The morphology of the firngal colony we described here is very similar to that reported by Yanagita and Kogane (1962). In their study, the colonial structures of Aspergillus niger and Penicillum urticae were divided into four zones. These zones from outside to center are the extending zone, the productive zone, the fi'uiting zone, 84 and the aged zone. The extending zone is represented by the outermost periphery consisting of a thin hyphal network extending centrifiigally. The productive zone is a piled-up hyphal mat with aerial hyphae. In the fruiting zone, fi'uiting bodies (conidiophore, conidia-bearing structure, and conidia) are being formed. The aged zone, the central part of the colony, consists of abundant conidia. Yanagita and Kogane also measured the basophilic substances such as RNA and DNA in each zone, and found that the productive zone contains more basophilic substances than any other part of the colonial tissue. Using Western blot (protein accumulation) and GUS activity analysis (ver-I promoter function) in this study, it was determined that the quantity of Ver-l protein and ver-I promoter activity are higher in the peripheral zone of the colony (Figure 21 and Figure 22). The morphology of the peripheral zone with the most intense blue staining (Figure 22) is identical to the productive zone described by Yanagita and Kogane. This means that the ver- 1 gene expression is more intense in the part of colony containing more basophilic substances. This spatial pattern of ver-I gene expression is likely based on the physiological differentiation in a mass of fungal cells deve10ping on a solid medium. Fungal cell differentiation can be observed by growing the fungi on solid substrates. When aspergilli grow on solid substrates, there are vegetative mycelia that grow in contact with the substrate. From vegetative mycelia, the aerial mycelia, a population of developing conidiophores, develop and eventually bear conidial heads (Bartman et al., 1981). A slide culture method was applied in this study in an attempt to correlate aflatoxin biosynthesis and cell differentiation. Using the ver-l/GUS reporter strain, the activity of the ver-I promoter, which is directly involved in aflatoxin biosynthesis, was monitored indirectly by a GUS activity assay. The GUS activity (blue staining or green fluorescence) was distributed in both 85 vegetative and conidiophore structures. Since the blue stain has been reported to be insoluble and precipitates at the site of GUS activity (Jefferson, 1988), the distribution of GUS activity is not likely the result of migration of the blue dye between cells. These data suggested that aflatoxin gene expression and therefore aflatoxin biosynthesis can occur in both cell structures. However, it remains possible that the GUS protein could be transported from cell to cell. To look more closely at this question, an alternative approach was utilized. The aerial mycelia were separated from vegetative mycelia by scraping the top layer of a flingal colony (pHD6-6 transformant 1) with a metal spatula after freezing the whole colony in liquid nitrogen. Microscopic examination of a scraped preparation indicated that the bulk of conidiophores and conidia had been removed. The remaining cell preparation (after scraping), however, still contained a significant number of conidiophores on them. Despite this lack of cleanliness, the scrape experiment is still capable of helping determine the distribution of aflatoxin gene expression. The proteins were extracted from scraped and residual cells and used for Western blot analysis for the Ver-l protein and the GUS activity assay. The results indicated that accumulation of Ver-l protein and ver-I promoter activity occurred at approximately equal levels in scraped and residual cells. These data confirm that the aflatoxin gene expression occurs throughout the fungal colony. The above data, however, still do not clearly establish the relationship between aflatoxin biosynthesis and cell differentiation because the experimental design does not allow us to record the timing of the onset of aflatoxin biosynthesis and cell development. The role of secondary metabolism in the producing fungus remains unclear despite decades of study. One proposal is that secondary metabolism may be involved in cell 86 differentiation (Campbell, 1983). By experimental design, any attempt to relate cell differentiation to firngal secondary metabolism should show that the initiation of production of secondary metabolites is accompanied by the development of one or more specific fimgal cell phenotypes. By detailed microscopic observation of cell growth and the measurement of the production of specific secondary metabolites, it has been reported that synthesis of some secondary metabolites is correlated to cell differentiation. Peace et a1. (1981) have shown that 6-methylsalicylic acid (6-MSA) is produced by P. patulum only after aerial mycelia have begun to form. It was not clear whether 6-MSA biosynthesis occurs in vegetative or aerial hyphae. Bartman et al. (1981) demonstrated that P. brevicompaclum produces mycophenolic acid only after aerial mycelia have begun to form. The biosynthesis likely takes place in vegetative hyphae and the bulk of the metabolite is excreted into the grth medium. Bird et al. (1981) reported that brevianamides A and B are produced by P. brevicompactum after conidiation had begun. These metabolites are located in the upper part of conidiophores and conidial heads. An ergosterol formed by P. brevicompactum was also shown to be produced after aerial mycelia began to form and the metabolite was distributed in both vegetative and aerial hyphae (Bird and Campbell, 1982). The involvement of aflatoxin biosynthesis in cell differentiation has been hypothesized based on the observation that aflatoxin biosynthesis is associated with the sclerotia formation (Trail et al., 1995). To address this hypothesis, future studies will analyze aflatoxin gene expression together with the cell development during the growth of A. parasiticus on solid media. CHAPTER 4 INTRACELLULAR LOCALIZATION OF THE VER-l PROTEIN IN F UNGAL CELLS I. INTRODUCTION While a lot of effort has been focused on genetic studies, little information has been reported with regard to understanding AFB, biosynthesis at the cellular level. Specifically, understanding the process of localization of proteins involved in AFB, biosynthesis may generate sufficient information to allow the design of specific and efficient ways to block aflatoxin production in fiingi. For those enzymes that have been identified to be involved in aflatoxin biosynthesis, two activities, averantin monooxygenase (AVN-5'-hydroxyaverantin; Yabe et al., 1993) and O-methylsterigmatocystin oxidoreductase (OMST~AFB,; Bhatnagar et al., 1989; Yabe et al., 1989), are localized to the microsomal fraction. Several other identified activities (Bhatnagar et al., 1989; Matsushima et al., 1994; Yabe and Hamaski, 1993), on the other hand, are found to be cytosolic or loosely bound to membranes. These data suggest that the biosynthesis of aflatoxins is carried out by a combination of membrane- associated and cytoplasmic enzyme activities. This could suggest that aflatoxins are synthesized at specific sites within the fiingal cell because at least some of the enzymes may localize to closely related sites to allow aflatoxin synthesis to be an efficient process. To test this hypothesis, in this study we localized the Ver—l protein by the protocols of subcellular 87 88 fractionation and immunolocalization. The subcellular localization of the Ver-l protein was determined by differential centrifugation of crude cell extracts. The proteins in each fraction were analyzed by Western blot analysis for the concentration of the Ver-l protein. Analysis of marker enzymes for certain cell organelles was also employed to detemiine their distribution within the cell fractions. Indirect immunofluorescence (11F) microscopy was performed to localize the Ver-l protein in hyphae and in individual cells of the fiingus. A slide culture method was used to grow the fungi for IIF microscopy. The location of the Ver-l protein was observed by the combination of anti-Verl antibodies and the goat-antirabbit polyclonal antibodies (secondary antibody) labeled with fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC) using a microscope equipped with epifluorescent filters. Laser Scanning Confocal Microscopy (LSM) was also applied to increase resolution and create a three-dimensional image. H. MATERIALS AND METHODS A. Differential centrifugation of fungal cell extracts The preparation of cell Iysates for subcellular fractionation was performed by two different methods. 1. Grinding in liquid nitrogen Conidia (2x10°) of A. parasiticus SU-l were inoculated into 100 ml of YES medium and grown in the dark for 60 hr at 30°C with shaking (150 rpm). The mycelia were filtered through Miracloth and frozen in liquid nitrogen. The frozen mycelia were ground using a mortar and pestle, suspended in TSA (2 mM Tris-CV40 mM NaCl/0.025% NaN3; pH 8.0) 89 buffer containing the proteinase inhibitors phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (PMSF; 0.1 mM) and aprotinin (50 pg/ml). The cell debris was removed by three successive centrifugation steps at 1,000g for 10 min at 4°C. The resulting supernatant was fractionated into a pellet and a supernatant by centrifugation at 6,000g for 20 min. The same procedure was repeated by centrifugation of the subsequent supernatant at 20,000g for 30 min; 50,000g for 30 min; 100,000g for 60 min; and 140,000g for 60 min, all at 4°C. Each pellet was washed three times and resuspended in TSA buffer. The protein concentration of the cell fractions was determined with the Bio-Rad Protein Assay kit. 50-100 pg of protein from each pellet fraction and the final supernatant were separated by electrophoresis ( 12 % SDS-PAGE), transferred to PVDF membrane, and probed with anti-Verl antibodies. 2. Disruption of protoplasts by a homogenizer The growth of A. parasiticus SU-l and the harvest of the mycelia was performed as described above. The mycelia were digested with 1% Novozyme 234 in digestion buffer (0.6 M KCl, 0.1 M citric acid, pH 6.0) for 4 hr at 30°C. The protoplasts were collected by passage through a 29 pm nylon mesh, and washed three times in 0.1 M MES buffer [2(N- morpholino)ethane sulphonic acid, pH 7 .5] containing 0.6 M KCl. The resulting protoplasts were resuspended in 0.1 M MES buffer containing 1.0 mM PMSF, 50 pg/ml aprotinin, 5 mM DTT, and 0.6 M KCl. The cells were disrupted by a Potter homogenizer (Auther H. Thomas Co.), and the resulting cell lysates were then treated as described above for differential centrifiigation and Western blot analysis for the Ver-l protein. B. Calculation of the quantity of the Ver-l protein in cell fractions Western blot analysis of proteins of each cell fraction from differential centrifirgation was used to determine the possible association of the Ver-l protein with organelles or the 90 cytoplasm. The relative but not exact quantity of the Ver-l protein could be determined by this method. Two sets (duplicate) of samples were loaded onto the same SDS-PAGE gel. After electrophoresis and transfer of the protein to PVDF membrane, one set of samples was stained with Coomassie blue to visualize the total protein. The other set of samples was used for Western blot analysis with anti-Verl antibodies. The Coomassie blue stained membrane and the Western blot were scanned to record the images using a scanner (Epson ES-1000C), and the intensity of the protein “bands” was analyzed by SigmaGel softwafe. The proportion of Ver-l protein in each cell fraction was calculated by the following three steps. (1) Specificguantiu (SQ) of the Ver—l protein (in each cell fraction) = intensity of the Ver-l protein (on Western blots) / intensity of the total protein loaded for analysis (2) Total quantity (TQ) of the Ver-l protein (in each cell fraction) = (SQ) x total protein in each cell fraction (3) Bropgnign of the Yer-l protein in each cell fraction = (TQ) / the sum of (TQ) of all cell fractions C. Analysis of marker enzyme activities Four marker enzymes were analyzed to determine the distribution of different organelles in cell fiactions including succinate dehydrogenase, catalase, acid phosphatase, and glucose-6-phosphatase. 1. Succinate dehydrogenase (marker for mitochondria) A spectrophotometric measurement based on reduction of ferricyanide was used according to Singer et al. (1965) with minor modifications. 0.6 ml Tris buffer (0.3 M, pH 7.6) was combined with 0.1 ml of 0.1 M potassium ferricyanide and 0.4 ml of 0.01 M 91 succinate. The final volume was adjusted to 3 ml by adding water. The optical density of this mixture was measured at 450 run before adding the enzyme solution. 1~5 pl (20 to 30 pg protein) of cell fraction preparation was then added to the reaction solution. The reaction was incubated 30 to 60 min until the optical density no longer decreased and the final reading was recorded. A control reaction was prepared by including 0.05 ml of 1.0 M malonate to completely inhibit the succinate dehydrogenase. 2 pmoles of ferricyanide are reduced for each pmole of succinate oxidized. The decrease in succinate was calculated using 2.06 as the molar extinction coefficient of ferricyanide. 1 unit of succinate dehydrogenase was defined as the amount of enzyme causing a decrease of 1 pmole succinate in 1 min. 2. Catalase (marker for microbodies) The catalase activity was determined as described by Cohen et al. (1970). The reaction mixture contained excess of H202 (1 ml of 2 % H202 solution) and 1~5 pl (20 to 30 pg protein) of cell fraction preparation. After incubation of the enzyme reaction for 10 to 30 min, the residual H202 was measured by reacting it with KMnQ and then measuring the residual KMnO4 spectrophotometrically at 480 nm. One unit of catalase was defined as the amount of enzyme required to liberate half the peroxide oxygen from a hydrogen peroxide solution of any concentration in 100 sec (Luck, 1965). 3. Acid phosphatase (marker for lysosomes) The activity of acid phosphatase was measured using an assay kit (Sigma) based on the method described by Andersch and Szczypinski (1947). The assay and determination of units of enzyme activity were performed according to manufacturer’s instnrctions. The Sigma procedure depends on the hydrolysis of p-nitrophenyl phosphate by the acid phosphatase, yielding p-nitrophenol and inorganic phosphate. Under alkaline conditions, p-nitrophenol is 92 converted to a yellow complex readily measured at 400-420 nm. 4. Glucose-6-phosphatase (marker for endoplasmic reticulum) Glucose-6-phosphatase activity was determined by measuring the quantity of inorganic phosphate formed after the reaction (Harper, 1965). The reaction mixture consisted of 1~5 pl (20 to 30 pg protein) of cell fraction preparation, 0.1 ml citrate buffer (0.1 M, pH 6.5), and 0.1 ml of 0. 1M glucose-6-phosphate. A control was prepared by addition of the same amount of sample to 0.2 M citrate buffer without the substrate. The mixture was incubated at 37°C for 30 min, and 1 ml trichloroacetic acid (10 %) was added to stop the enzyme reaction. After centrifiigation, 1 ml supernatant was mixed with 5 ml molybdate solution (2x10‘3 M) and 1 ml reducing agent (4x10‘2 M 1-amino-2-naphthol-4-sulphonic acid). A standard was prepared by replacing the sample supernatant with 1 ml of 5x10“1 M phosphate standard solution. The mixture was stored at room temperature for 15 to 30 min and the optical density was read at 660 nm. One unit of glucose-6-phosphatase was defined as the quantity of enzyme required to liberate 1 pmole phosphate in 1 min. D. Indirect immunofluorescence microscopy A. parasiticus SU-l or VAD-102 were grown on cover slips as described in Chapter 3. The slide cultures were incubated in the dark at 30°C for 24 to 65 hr. The fiingal cells were fixed for 4 hr at room temperature or 16 hr at 4°C in Histochoice Tissue Fixative (Ameresco; Solon, OH). For partial digestion of the cell wall, the fimgal cells were subjected to a cell wall digestive enzyme solution containing 1 % Novozyme 234 in water for 1 hr at 30°C. The cell membrane of the hyphae was then permeabilized with 0.1% saponin in Tris- buffered saline (TBS, pH 7.3) for 30 min at room temperature. The hyphae were then exposed to anti-Ver-l antibodies (10 pg/ml) in TBS containing 0.1 % saponin, and 1 % 93 bovine serum albumin (BSA) for 1 hr. This incubation was followed by thorough rinses with TBS (3 times, 10 min each). The slide preparation was then incubated with labeled secondary antibodies (100 fold dilution of FITC-conjugated anti-rabbit IgG; Sigma) for 1 hr. For negative control experiments, the hyphae were labeled only with the secondary antibodies. The hyphae were rinsed with TBS to remove the unbound secondary antibodies. After the final wash with water, the preparation was air dried, mounted on slides (using Sigma immunofluorescent mounting medium), and examined under a Nikon Labophot fluorescent microscope or a laser scanning confocal microscope (Zeiss 10) for FITC fluorescence. IH.RESULTS A. Subcellular localization of the Ver—l protein in A. parasiticus Western blot analysis (Figure 25) showed that the Ver—l protein was detected in all pellets as well as supernatant fractions regardless of which method was used to prepare the cell lysates. However, the distribution of Ver—l protein in cell fractions was different between these two methods (Table 1). When mycelia were ground in liquid nitrogen, almost all the Ver—l protein (96.9 %) was in the final supernatant fi'action. If the cell lysate was prepared by disruption of protoplasts, the proportion of Ver—l protein in the supernatant fraction was decreased to 80.95 %, and a significant increase of Ver-l protein was found in the 20,000g pellet (Table 1). The analysis of marker enzyme activity (Table 2) indicated that a very high percentage of organelle enzymes (e.g., 98 % of catalase activity and 98.24 % of acid phosphatase activity) were distributed to the final supernatant fraction when the cell lysate was prepared by grinding the mycelia in liquid nitrogen. The distribution of one marker enzyme (acid phosphate) in the final supernatant was decreased from 98.24 % to 69.78 %, 94 Figure 25. Western blot analysis of cell fractions from A. parasiticus SU— l. The cell lysates were prepared by grinding the mycelia in liquid nitrogen (panel A) or disruption of protoplasts by a homogenizer (panel B). Cell pellets (P) and the final supernatant fi'action (S) were obtained by differential centrifiigation of cell lysates at 6,000g (6P), 20,000g (20P), 50,000g (SOP), 100,000g (100P), and 140,000g (140P). 50 pg of protein from each fraction were resolved by gel electrophoresis (12% SDS-PAGE), transferred to PVDF membrane, and probed with anti-Ver-l antibodies. Figure 25. 96 3.8 3: ohm :3 8.3 7% .5553 5 555 75> 5 85855 8." m 2: :5. :5 3M: .555 75> 5 €555 2.555% 555? 5.? N3 53 mam 8.2 7% 8855 a 5555 5 55855 8? mm 3 SN 8% as 8553 a 555% .555 amuEmMofig \8 32572.53 5.23538an 855 Ed 52 and as 2.0 75V 2558 a 555 75> 5 5:555 8.02 38 5.8 $3 8.8 2 5m 555 75> 5 €55 2.555% 2622 8.3 m3 8N NS 93. 52 75V 5253 a 5555 .5 SE85 8.55 So 53. 8.5 was $5 8.5 5552.5. a 3:85 5555 acme“? 3%.: S 339% ESSA: ESE—baa 8on 3:09 Bang 8on 3on 3:83 mass: @352 macaw $3.8 5:35 eaten—5.559 .utqouotmc .3 7.3m 9.392333% .V Set 3:33: 28.53.... :3 E 389:— 7...o> 2: he ecu—55mm: A 035,—. 97 cosh—.2... 9.95 5.... e: u 2. 3.3.2. 253.... 035082. e: u .1... 3.3 3... 2... S... 2.... .- 75. 3.2.2. 33:33.2. 3.... 2.... ma... .2 t... : 3. 5.2.2. .253... 332.22... 22.. uuumzuueiea .8 uuaasau 82.3895 2...... 2... S... S... 2... 2... ..\.. 3.3.2. 38.5.2.2. 523...... 8.... 8... n3 3.... 2.... o... S. 3.2.3 5.82.235 92.222.555.320 3.: 8.... S... .6... .n... 2... TX. 3.2:. 38:93.2. 8...... 2.. z... a.» .3. 2. 5. £25.. 3:83;. 2.32.22... 22.. 2...... ms... or... 2... .2... .n... TX. 3.2... 33:23:... 8...... 2... 2.... 3.. a... on... 3. 3.2.2. 3:22.22... 52......0 -. -- 2.... 3...... 2...... no..." .3. 3.2:. 1.3.3.2.: ...... .2. 2.... 3... on... m... 5. 5.2.2. «2.2.2.3.? 2.53.522. 3.58.5 5&2»... 3:... 5 353..» 3:83.: 2.32:1... 3:2— 3:2— .o=o.— 3:0.— .o=o._ .8 3.2.2 «Emu...— uxac... 33...... 32...... 32.8 .33.... 33.. Stamp—.550 33:985.. .3 72m u:e.....§sem .v. 5...... 355.... 32.2....— =8 a. 85.3.... 31.5.. no 5.35.5.5 .N 035. 98 accompanied by a significant increase of enzyme distribution in the 20,000g and 50,000g pellets when disruption of protoplasts by a homogenizer was employed to prepare the cell lysate (Table 2). These data suggested that grinding the mycelia in liquid nitrogen significantly damaged cell organelles and resulted in a higher level of distribution of marker enzymes in the final supernatant fraction. Disruption of protoplasts using a homogenizer was a better way to preserve intact cell organelles. Using this method the distribution of marker enzymes and Ver-l protein increased in cell pellets fractions indicating that the Ver-l protein may locate in an “organelle-like” structure. This “structure” was distributed mainly in the 20,000g (or less then 20,000g) pellet fiaction. B. Intracellular localization of the Ver-l protein in A. parasiticus Immunofluorescence microscopy using the anti-Ver—l antibodies demonstrated that the Ver-l protein was tightly associated with particle-like fluorescent signals that were distributed to the hyphae and conidiophores of an aflatoxin-producing strain (Figure 26A and B). In contrast, a control strain, VAD-102 in which no Ver-l protein was synthesized, showed no or very little fluorescent signal (Figure 26C). The negative control, when only secondary antibodies were utilized on aflatoxin-producing strain (SU-l), showed no fluorescent signal. Under low magnification (x100), it was observed that the overall fluorescent signal was stronger in conidiophores then in vegetative hyphae (Figure 26D and E). The fluorescent particles were then observed at higher magnification in 3 dimensions by confocal microscope (Figure 26F), and the particles were determined to be inside the cell wall (Figure 26G). 99 Figure 26. Localization of the Ver-l protein in fungal cells by immunofluorescence microscopy and laser confocal microscopy. A. parasiticus SU—l and VAD-102 were grown by the slide culture method for 65 hr on YES media. The cells were fixed, partially digested by Novozyme 234, and incubated with anti-Verl antibodies. The bound antibodies were then probed with the FITC-conjugated secondary antibodies. Preparations were examined in a Nikon Labophot microscope equipped with epifluorescence filters for FITC fluorescence (picture A ~ E) or a Zeiss 10 laser confocal microscope (picture F and G). The fluorescent particles were observed in the hyphae and conidiophores of A. parasiticus SU-l (picture A, B; x400) but very little in that of VAD-102 (picture C; x400). A stronger fluorescent intensity was shown in conidiophores of A. parasitius SU-l under lower magnification (picture D; x100). Picture E was a brightfield image of picture D. The fluorescent signals were also observed by the laser confocal microscope (picture F; x4000). A fluorescent particle was shown by confocal microscope to be inside the cell (picture G, top half). 100 Figure 26. A. edrz SEEK? .3.- 11 .u ‘ . . .,.. i)» 5“ 101 Figure 26. (cont’d) 102 Figure 26. (cont’d) 1 03 IV. DISCUSSION The location of one aflatoxin biosynthetic pathway protein, the Ver-l protein, in the fimgal cell was investigated in this study. Subcellular localization was initially conducted by differential centrifugation. Although Western blot analysis of cell fractions generated by grinding cells under liquid nitrogen showed that the Ver-l protein was located in all pellet fractions, a high percentage of the Ver-l protein was contained in the final supernatant fi'action. It was thus not clear whether the Ver-l protein is located in the pellets or if it is just carried-over contamination from the supernatant. The fact that a high percentage of marker enzyme activities were also distributed to the supernatant fraction indicated that cell organelles were damaged using the grinding procedure. Tolbert (1974) has reported that most organelles are damaged by the grinding procedure, which therefore must be as brief as possible. When the cell lysates were prepared by disruption of protoplasts by a homogenizer, it was found that the distribution of marker enzymes and the Ver—l protein in the supernatant was significantly decreased suggesting that this procedure is superior to the grinding method for preparing samples for subcellular fractionation. The increase in the proportion of Ver—l protein in pellet fractions, especially the 20,000g pellet, suggested that the Ver-l protein was located in an organelle or membrane-bound structure and it was not due to contamination from the proteins in the supernatant. The detection of the particle structures in the fungal cell by immunofluorescent microscopy supported the observation resulting from the subcellular fractionation. These Ver—l protein containing structures seemed to be more densely clustered in the conidiophore and conidial head indicating a potential association of aflatoxin biosynthesis with conidiophore development. Differential centrifugation separates organelles on the basis of mass and shape. The 104 data here suggest that a relatively large organelle (in the pellet of 20,000g or less) may contain the Ver-l protein inside, in the membrane, or tightly associated with the outside surface. In general, the distribution of organelles from low to high gravitational forces are nuclei (500 - 2,000g), mitochondria and microbodies (5,000 - 15,000g), lysosomes (20,000 - 50,000g), microsomes (90,000 - 120,000g), and ribosomes (140,000g) (Griffin, 1981). However, the shape of the organelles may vary fi'om species to species (Markham, 1994). Even within a single species, the developmental stage and nature of the carbon and energy source can affect the number and the shape of organelles. Organelles such as microbodies and lysosomes bounded by a single bilayer membrane are more vulnerable to the breakage procedure of subcellular fractionation. The involvement of cell organelles in penicillin biosynthesis was analyzed (Muller et al., 1991 and 1992) using immunological detection methods in combination with subcellular fractionation and electron microscopy. The results suggested that the three penicillin biosynthetic enzymes are located in different subcellular compartments. The first step enzyme, 6-(L-or-aminoadipyl)-cysteinyl-D-valine synthetase (ACVS) was found to be associated with membranes or small organelles. The next enzyme, isopenicillin N-synthetase (IPNS), appeared to be a cytosolic enzyme. The enzyme involved in the final step of penicillin biosynthesis, acyltransferase (AT), was located in microbodies. This model implicates several transport steps for B-lactam intermediates and products. However, it is still not clear why a specific enzymatic reaction is confined in an organelle. The speculation is that the organelle may provide a specialized environment for the reaction, for example, by providing a condition suitable for the existence of the substrate or the reaction product, by the absence of competing enzymes, or by providing a different pH. It is also possible that the organelle can protect cells from the toxicity of the products. 105 In eukaryotic cells, the sorting of proteins to their subcellular locations is often mediated through N-terminal signal sequences that lack conservation and are cleaved upon import (Blobel, 1980). This mode of protein segregation has been demonstrated for protein import into the nucleus (Kalderon et al., 1984), mitochondria (Hase et al., 1984), chloroplasts (Van den Broek et al., 1985), lysosomes (Johnson et al., 1987), and the endoplasmic reticulum (secretion as well as retention of proteins; Walter and Lingappa, 1986). In contrast, conserved tripeptide targeting signals (serine, alanine, or cysteine at the first position; lysine, histidine, or arginine at the second position; leucine at the third position) at the extreme C- terminus are necessary for directing proteins into microbodies (Gould et al., 1989). The targeting signal, an alanine-arginine-leucine sequence, was found to be at the C-terminus of the acyltransferase involved in the penicillin biosynthesis confirming its location in microbodies (Muller et al., 1992). By analysis of the cellular distribution of enzymatic activity, it has been proposed that some enzymes involved in aflatoxin biosynthesis are membrane-bound while others appear to be cytosolic. In this study, we presented the first physical observation that an aflatoxin pathway enzyme, the Ver-l protein, might be located in a cell organelle. The Ver-l protein may not be located in microbodies because the protein lacks a consensus C-terminal signal sequence. However, there may be a unique system for import of proteins involved in aflatoxin biosynthesis. It is unclear if there is a N-terminal signal sequence in the Ver-l protein. This question cannot be solved until N-terminal sequence analysis is performed on the Ver-l protein purified from the fiingus. To confirm and examine the possible structure that is associated with the Ver-l protein, a fiJture study using immuno-electron microscopy will be helpful. Also, using antibodies against other pathway enzymes for immuno-fluorescent 106 or immuno-electron microscopy will be useful in analyzing whether several membrane- associated enzymes are confined in the same organelle. CONCLUSIONS In this dissertation, we have accomplished the specific aims proposed. (1) We have established the structural and fiJnctional characteristics of two ver-I genes (ver-IA and ver- IB) involved in aflatoxin biosynthesis. It was detemiined that the previously cloned ver-I gene is ver-IA by restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) analysis. A duplicated chromosomal region (approximately 12-kb) was identified upstream fi'om ver-IA and ver-IB by Southern hybridization analysis. The nucleotide sequence of ver-IB was determined, and the predicted amino acid sequence of ver-IB shared 95% identity with ver-IA. A translational stop codon, found in the ver-IB gene coding region, indicated that it encodes a truncated polypeptide. To confirm the fimction of the ver-I genes in AFB, synthesis, a plasmid (pDV-VA) was designed to disrupt ver-IA and/or ver-IB by transformation of the AFB, producer A. parasiticus NR-l. One disruptant, VAD-102, was obtained which accumulated the pathway intermediate VA. Southern hybridization analysis of VAD-102 revealed that ver-IA but not ver-IB was disrupted. A functional ver-IA gene was transformed back into strain VAD-102. Transformants which received ver-IA produced AFB, confirming that ver-IA is the only fianctional ver-I gene. (2) An anti—Ver-l antibody which specifically recognized the fungal Ver-l protein was generated against the maltose- binding protein/Ver-l fiision protein obtained by expression of the maIE/ver-IA cDNA construct in E. coli. Batch fermentation and nutritional shift analyses indicated that the timing 107 108 of Ver-l protein accumulation is positively correlated to aflatoxin accumulation. The expression of the ver-I gene in a fiingal colony grown on solid media was shown to exhibit temporal and spatial patterns of regulation. Using the ver-I/GUS reporter strain, it was demonstrated that fiJngal vegetative hyphae, conidiophores, and conidial heads all actively transcribed the ver-I gene. (3) Localization of the Ver-l protein using subcellular fractionation and immunofluorescence microscopy indicated that the Ver-l protein may be located in a membrane-bound structure. Two lines of data suggest that AFB, biosynthesis may occur at higher levels during early stages of conidiophore development. First, the stronger or darker GUS staining (blue or fluorescent staining) was located to the younger conidiophore, especially in the vesicle structure, when ver-I/GUS reporter strains were used to examine ver—I promoter function. Second, a higher density of fluorescent signals in the conidiOphore was observed when anti-Ver-l antibodies were used for immuno-detection of the Ver-l protein. This research represents one important approach toward achieving the long term goal of identifying compounds which interfere with the expression of genes involved in AFB, biosynthesis. Afier ver-I gene function was confirmed to be directly involved in AFB, biosynthesis, the ver-I/GUS reporter strain can thus be utilized to monitor the effect of various natural or synthetic compounds on the expression of the ver-I gene both in the laboratory and the field. Using the ver-I gene and its product, the Ver-l protein, as a model system, a preliminary understanding of aflatoxin biosynthesis at the cellular level has been achieved. Further exploration in this field may lead to an understanding of the possible function of aflatoxin biosynthesis in the fungus. The information presented here may eventually help in solving the worldwide aflatoxin problem. APPENDIX APPENDIX PHYSICAL AND TRANSCRIPTIONAL MAP OF AN AFLATOXIN GENE CLUSTER IN ASPERGILL US PARASIT IC US I. INTRODUCTION A cooperative study in our lab was performed to analyze an aflatoxin gene cluster in A. parasiticus NRRL 5862. During the genetic characterization of nor-1 and ver-I genes, the cosmid NorA was identified to contain both genes. This was the first finding that the aflatoxin genes may be physically linked together. A restriction enzyme map of the 35-kb genomic DNA fragment insert in cosmid NorA was generated. Based on these initial studies, a hypothesis was proposed : some other aflatoxin associated genes may also be located within this chromosomal region. To address this hypothesis, Northern hybridization analyses were performed on RNA isolated from a toxigenic strain of A. parasiticus using consecutive DNA fragments from the 35-kb genomic DNA fragment of cosmid NorA as the probes. The resulting transcriptional map of the genomic DNA insert in cosmid NorA revealed that 14 different RNA transcripts were localized to this region. Eight of these transcripts were proposed to be derived from aflatoxin genes because the timing of their expression (transcript accumulation) was similar to that of nor-1 and ver-I genes. Two of these eight hypothesized aflatoxin genes, kaA (previously named gene-1; Trail et al., 1995) and fas-IA (previously named uvm8; Mahanti et al., 1996) have been recently shown to be directly involved in aflatoxin biosynthesis by gene disruption analysis. 109 110 II. PUBLISHED PAPER Amen AND ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY. July 1995. p. 2665-2673 Vol. 61. No. 7 0099-2240/95/504.00+0 Copyright 0 1995. American Society for Microbiology Physical and Transcriptional Map of an Aflatoxin Gene Cluster in Aspergillus parasiticus and Functional Disruption of a Gene Involved Early in the Aflatoxin Pathway F. TRAIL. N. MAHANTIJ’ M. RARICK. R. MEHIGHA: S.-H. LIANG. R. ZHOU. AND J. E. LiNZ‘ Department of Food Science and Human Nutrition. Michigan State University. East lansing. Michigan 48824 Received 6 January l995/Accepted 20 April I995 Two genes involved in aliatoxin B, (AFB!) biosynthesis in Mars, non-l and tier-l, were localiaedtoaSS-kbregiononmeA.pamsirienschmmosomeandtothegenomk DNAfragmentearriedona single cosmid. NorA. A physical and transcriptional map of the 354:!) genomic DNA insert in cosmid NorA was prepared to help determine whether other genes located in the nor-14ers! region were involved in allatoxin synthesis. Northern (RNA) analysis performed on RNA isolated from A. pamr'tr'cus SUI grown in allatoxin- inducing medium localized I4 RNA transcripts encoded by this region. Eight of these transcripts. previously unidentified, showed a pattern of accumulation similar to that of nor-l and rer-l. suggesting possible involve- ment in AFBI synthesis. To directly test this hypothesis. gene-l. encoding one of the eight transcripts, was disrupted in A. parasirieus CSIO. which accumulates the atlatoxin precursor versicolorin A. by insertion of plasmid pAPNVES4. Thin-layer chromatography revealed that gene-I disruptant clones no longer accumulated versicolorin A. Southern hybridization analysis of these clones indicated that gene-l had been disrupted by insertion of the disruption vector. These data confirmed that gene-I is directly involved in AFB] synthesis. The predicted amino acid sequence of two regions of gene-l showed a high degree of identity and similarity with the B—ketoacyl-synthase and acyltransferase functional domains of polyketide synthases, consistent with a pro- posedroleforgene-l in polyketidehaclrbonesynthesis. Aflatoxins are potent teratogenic. mutagenic. and carcino- genic secondary metabolites synthesized by certain strains of Aspaxr'llus parasirr'cus and A. flams (25). Under the proper environmental conditions. these ubiquitous fungi can produce aflatoxin upon infection of many agricultural crops. including peanuts. corn. cottonseed. and tree nuts (20). Because of the difficulty in eflectivcly controlling aflatoxin contamination of food and feed by traditional agricultural practices. recent re- search efiorts have focused on developing an understanding of the molecular biology of the aflaloxin biosynthetic pathway. This knowledge may lead to novel methods for control of this economically and agriculturally important problem. Aflatoxins are polyketide-derived secondary metabolites. The carbon backbone of aflatoxin B| (AFBI) is synthesized from acetate and malonate in a process analogous to fatty acid synthesis (9. 24. 53). A generally accepted pathway for the synthesis of AFBI has been proposed (reviewed in references 9 and 10). The first stable intermediate identified in the path- way is the decaketidc norsolorinic acid (NA), an anthraqui- none. which is converted to averufin (AVF) by a multistep series of reactions involving up to three alternative pathways (9. 56). AVF is then converted to versiconal hemiacetal acc- tate. versiconal. versicolorin B. versicolorin A (VA). demcth- ylsterigmatoqstin, sterigmatocystin (ST). O-mcthylsterigmato- cystin, and finally. to AFBl. As many as I? different enzyme activities are proposed to be involved in aflatoxin synthesis (9. 24). Several of these enzymes have been purified to homoge- neity (I. 8. ll. I6. 28. 34, 4t). 53). ‘Oorresponding author. Phone: (5|?) 353- 9624. Fax: (5|?) 353- 8963 t Present address: Department of Forensics. Michigan State Police E Lansing. Mich. it Present address: Sigma Chemical Co.. St. Louis. Mo. 2065 Aflatoximblockcd mutants (4. 32) and purified enzymes have been used to done several genes involved in the aflatoxin biosynthetic pathway. including nor-l (IS). encoding an activity which converts NA to averantin; tier-l (48). encoding an activ- ity associated with the conversion of VA to ST ; uvm8 (36). encoding a putative fatty acid synthase involved in polyketide backbone synthesis; amt-l, encoding a methyltransferase which converts ST to O-mcthyl-ST (57): and (1le (I3. 45). apparently involved in the regulation of pathway gene expression. The recombinational inactivation (gene disruption) of nor-I (S4). ver-l (33). uvmh‘ (36). and pluA (l4) in A. parasiticus and MA (29) in A. rridulans (which synthesizes ST) firmly established the functional role of these genes in the AFBI (or ST) biosyn- thetic pathway. Parasexual analyses of eight aflatoxin-bloclted mutants (in- cluding an NA-accumulating strain) in A. [iavus suggested that all loci were genetically linked on linkage group VII (44). Attempts to demonstrate linkage of nor-l and tor-l genes in A. [ramsiticus by parasexual analyses. however. gave conflicting results (5. I2; reviewed in reference 7). The molecular genetic analysis presented in the current study clearly demonstrates the clustering (linkage) of nor-l. uvrn8. and tier-l within a 35okb region on one chromosome in A. parasitic-us SUI. In addition. restriction endonuclease analysis and transcript mapping of this 35-kb region localized eight other transcripts that are ex- pressed in a pattern similar to that of nor-l. ver-l. and uvm8. suggesting that the genes encoding them are also involved in aflatoxin production. To test this hypothesis. disruption of gene-l (tentatively named because of its position at the far left end of the cluster) encoding a 74th transcript within the gene cluster (37) was accomplished in this study. Genetic and bio- chemical analyses of disruptant clones and nucleotide se- quence analysis of extensive regions within gene-l suggest that Ill 2666 TRAIL ET AL it encodes a polyketide synthase involved in AFB] biosynthe- sis. MATERIALS AND METHODS Strains and culture conditions. Escherichia coli DHSo F‘ '[F'IendAI MR” (r.' or") mp6“ rIu-I rrcAI gwA (Nal') reMleocZYA-argf)...” (mfllncZA M [5)] was used for promgating plasmid DNA. A. parosr‘rktrs NRRL $862 (SUI). a wild-type aflatorttn-produong strain. was used for preparation of RNA for transcnpt mapping A. partisans GIG (yer-l wit-I per [48]) derived from A. mm ATCC 36837 (rev-I wit-I [4]) was used as the host strum for the d'uruption of gene-I. Strains CS") and ATCC 36537 are unable to convert VA to ST as a result of a ml mutation. and neither produms dctectdtlc levels of AFBI in liquid or on solid gmwth media. The following strains d A panorama were used to analyze sclerotiunt development: AFBI-producirg drain SUI. AVF-accumulating strain ATCC 245.“ (13). NA-accumulating strain ATCC 246% (32). and VA-accumulating strain ATCC 36537. Fungal strains were matntatncd as frozen spore stocks (approximately I0” spores per ml) in 20% glycerol at —nrc. Coconut agar medium (CAM [2]). an aflatoainvinducing medium. was used for rapid screening of fungal strains for accumulation of AFBI and VA by visualization of blue and yellow fluoremencc. respectively. under long-wave UV light. YES broth (2% yeast extract. 20% sucrose; pll 55). a rich allatotrin—inducing medium. was used to grow mycelia for DNA and RNA preparations and for thin-layer chromatography (TLC) assays. Reddy's medium. a chemically defined aflatoain-tnducrng medium (47). also was used to grow mycelia for RNA preparatioru Isolation and analysis of RNA and DNA. Fungal cultures for DNA and RNA preparations were grown in YES (DNA and RNA) or Reddy's medium (RNA) at 29'thth shaking ( I75 rpm) and harvested at the times indicated in the figure legends (48 h for DNA). DNA was purified from A. parasitic-ta by a published modification (50) of a phenol-chloroform protocol developed for mammalian DNA (3). Total RNA was purified from allatosindnduced cultures of A. porn- sirmu SUI (IO‘ spores per ml). using a hot-phenol protocol previously described (39). Restriction cndonucleases utilized in analysts of DNA were purchased from Boehringer Mannheim Butchcmicals or New England BioLabs and were used according to the manufacturer's instructions. Northern (RNA) and Southern hybridization analyses were performed using published procedures (38). with a modified hybridization bufler and conditions recommended by Stratagenc (Ton. ing Systems. La lolla. Calif. ”P-radtolabcllcd DNA probur were prepared with a Random Primed DNA Labelling Kit from Boehringer Mannhetrn Butcher!“- cals After the final wash. nylon or nitrocellulose membranes were placed on X-ray film (Kodak-XARS) at -—tlI'C. DNA probes unlined tn transcript mapping (Northern analyses) and Southern hybridization analyses were generated frotn DNA restriction fragments derived from amid NorA or crumd strbclttncs as shown in Fig I The gene probes used ascontrols in transcript maturing amsrsted of a 4.34m EcoRI-Sari DNA restriction fragment Ntlalcd from amid NorA containing the pvt; gene from A. promotion (48) and a I.I-kb Arrl-Sarl frag- ment containing part of the coding region of the gene encodmg B-tubulm in A. pnrnsun‘us (S51). Plasmid and can-id canstrndlan .d pnrlhotian. Cratmids NorA. Norll. Ver2. Ver3. and Ver4 were isolated by in situ colony hybridization (3) of a cosmid library containing A. pennants SUI genomic DNA cloned into the cosmod vector p825 (4N). ‘zP-labellcd DNA restriction fragments containtng the nor-I or trr-I genes (marl. LS-kb ”gill-Clef restriction fragment; oer-I. Illi-Itb AtnI-Iiuml lI restriction fragment [49]) were used as probes to screen the library. Plasmid pAI’NVI‘SM was constructed to disrupt gene-l by single-cutsstwcr insertion till“ the homologous region of the chromosome (see Fig. 4). A 4.3-kb licuRl-Sml A. [armour-ta genomic DNA restriction fragment subcloned from cosmid NorA. encompassing the entire WC coding region (part of the original leZS vector) plus a lb-ltb region within the coding region of gene-l. was subcltmed into pUCI9 cut with (5(an and Serf. Plasmid mrntpreparattons were performed by the boiling method (38); large- scalc plasmrd preparations were performed amordtng to the alkaline lysis pro- cedure of Mamatts ct al. (38). Renrktknendoucleaxanalydahnserlptm‘phydcaluage analysis of cosmid NorA. An 5'le restriction endonuclease digest of mid NorA was prepared. The resulting fragments were subcloned into pUCl9 or pBluescript SKIN -) except for a lilo-lib EcoRI fragment containtng the nor! gene and a 4 64th EcoRI fragment immediately adjacent to the lilo-lib fragment. The "lb-lib EcoRI fragment was cut into two fragments with Sad. and each resulting fragment (4.3 and 6.3 kb: clones 3 and 4. respectively) was subcltmed into pBluei-crrpt SKII( - ) cut with EcoRI and Surf. The 4.6-kb EcoRI fragment was subcloned tnto pHIuescriptSKfM —) as three fragments: two ”ch EcoRI- thdlll fragments flanking one IIb—kb Hindlll fragment (see Fig. 2). From these subclones. a restriction map of the entire cosmid was prepared by mapping each subclone wtth Itipnl. Apnl. Sinai. Sad. and Xhal (Fig. I). The genes nor-I. vet-I. and mind were localized onto subclones by Southern hybridization analysis in conjunction with the restriction endonuclease analysis The [Knitaut of aim was provided as part of a separate study (58). Measurement of atlatorin synthesis in A. parasiticns SUI. Measurements of mycelial dry weights in Reddy's and YES growm media were performed csscn~ Ant. ENVIRON. Micaoatoe tially as described previously (54). Direct competitive enzyme—linked immu- nosorbent assay analyses of AFBI production were performed as desalted by Pestka (46) uith AFB! monoclonal antibodies and AFN-horseradish peroxidase conjugate (both kindly provided by .I. Pestka. Michigan State University). Transformation of A. mass and genetic disruption of gene-I. Transfor- mation of protoplasts of A parasmcus CSIO was conducted using minor modi- fications of the polyethylene glycol method (43). as previously described (50). [7va ‘ prototrophs were selected on Czapck Om medium (Difco). pAPNVES43 (see Fig. 4) was used as the disruption vector. pPGJJ. containing thcnvG gene only (50). served as a control plasmid to measure the rate of successful trans- formation Transformant clones were transferred to CAM to screen for VA accumulation. Transformant clones were purified by single spore isolation three succesive ttrnes Genetic and biochemical analysis at gene-l m dance. Ehrlcntneyer flasks (250 ml) containing Ill) ml of YES broth were inoatlated ( Ifln spores) with gene-l disruptant chines or AT'I‘C 36537 (control; parental strain d transfor- mation recipient strain CSIO) and incubated without agitation at 30‘C in the dark. After 72 h of growth. mycelial mats were removed and blotted dry. Onc- quarter (wet weight) of the mycelial mat was dned overnight at “PC to deter- mine dry uetght. The remainder of each mycelial mat and the gromh medium were extracted separately with acetone and then with chloroform as previously described (54) TLC analyses of the solvent extracts were performed on activated high-performance silica TLC plates ( It) by It) cm) in a chamber cquilibrated with benzene-acetic and (955). Purified VA (gcncrrnasly provided by Decpak Bhat- nagar) was resolved on each plate as a standard. DNA was purified from myce- Iium grown separately in YES broth for 48 h as described above and was analyned by Southern hybridization. Sclerotiunt productian. Gene-I disruptant clones were tested for the ability to produce sclerotta. Aflatoxtn-producrng stratn SUI. NA-accumulating strain ATCC 2469". VA-accumulattng strain ATCC 36537. and AVF-accumulating strain ATCC 245.” were grown under identical conditions for comparison. Strains were center inoculated onto pctri plates containing approaimatcly 30 ml of CAM medium and incubated for l4 days in the dark at 3tf'C. Sclcmtia were harvested and counted by a wbltshcd modification (48) of a method [neviottsly described by Cotty (l9). Nucleotideseqnenceanalysis. Nucleotide sequence analysiswasconductedon cosmid NorA subclones (clones 3 and 4. two SerfJicuRI restriction fragments encoding a large patron of gencd) at the Plant Research Laboratory at Mich- igan State Unnentty and by DNA Technologies Inc. Rochvillc. Md. Automated nucleotide sequencers (Alli robotic catalyst and 373A DNA sequencer) and fluorescent lalwlled T3 and T7 oligonucleotide printers were used to generate and analyze dideoay sequence reactions. Nucleottdc sequence data were ana~ Iyu-d with the WN'INNO GCMIIO Computer (inmp Package. The ktcations of introns and open reading frames were predicted with the software programs Framcx Tcstcode. and ('odon Preference and the A. nrdulnns codtm usage hie descrilxd previously (35. S4), ('ornparisims of predicted amino acid sequences to EMIlI- and Gt-nllanlt database libraries were conducted with TFastA and Gap and aligned with I‘rleup from the Wisconsin Genera Computer Group Package. RESULTS Restriction endonuclease analysis of cosmid NorA and physical linkage of nor-l and tier-l. In screening an A. para- siticus SUI genomic DNA cosmid library. four cosmid clones hybridized to the wr-l probe (NorA. Ver2. Ver3. and Ver4) and two clones hybridized to the nor-l probe (NorA and NorB). Cosmid NorA was of panicular interest because it hybridized to both the nor-I and vet-I gene probes. A restric- tion endonuclease map of cosmid NorA was generated to allow localization of nor-l. ver—l. and «mm? genes (an EcoRI and Xbal restriction map is shown in Fig. I). Since cosmid NorA hybridized to both nor-I and ver-l. it is suggested that either the two genes are physically linked in the genome ofA. para- siticus or nor-I and wr-l were brought together on cosmid NorA due to recombination of normally unlinked chromo- somal fragments. To distinguish between these possibilities. Southern hybridization analyses were performed on cosmid NorA and genomic DNA isolated directly from toxigenic A. pamsr'ticus SUI (Fig. 2A). The nor-l probe hybridized to iden- tical 224th Xhal DNA restriction fragments in cosmid NorA and in genomic DNA. The vcr-l probe hybridized to a I9-kb Xbal fragment in cosmid NorA and a 2l-kb Xbal fragment in genomic DNA. A 3.2-kb Sad-BamHI subclone from cosmid NorA which spanned the junction between the two large Xbal fragments (22 and I9 kb) hybridized to the same 22- and ZI-kb 112 VOL 6!. I995 AFLATOXIN GENE CLUSTER IN A. PARASITICUS 2667 l 2 s _ i , s ”'m 4.6-in iii-u 1.8-in E X E E E ? I 4 I I I i ace-l anal L's-u.— 0.9-kb 1.5-in 1.0—kl: (gene-l) 6.5-kli (gene-1) ritoars r a 9 to 6 l u 51%;" 1: ts» 1.9-kb 1.4-kb u-ui s x 3m 1.1-kb so-u i: E i-: i x i II E i: r: —'—-|=_.‘- 1 ' ' 4 ‘w afll var-IA Alp 1.1-kb tut. —L25-Ith— 1.15-in L'l-klr 2.1-kb ofii Les—i ins-tit. Wins FIG. I. Restriction endonuclease and transcript map of cosmid NorA. Sizes and locations of transcripts and 15le reflriction fragments are shown. nI’-Iabelled probes used to locate transcripts (see Fig. 3B) are numbered I through 12. Locations of genes and directions of transcription are indicated when information is available. Vector sequences are indicated by shaded blocks. The transcribed region of gene»! continues beyond the end of cosmrd NorA. All Xhal (X) and 154le (I5) sites are shown. The locations of Surf (S) and liamlll (ll) sites are only included to mark the probe used in linkage analysis; other sites are not included. Xbal fragments in genomic DNA as the nor-l and ver-l gcnc probes (and to the 22- and I9-kb Xbaf fragments in cosmid NorA). These results strongly suggest that the 22- and 2l-kb DNA restriction fragments carrying nor-l and vet-l, respec- tively. are directly linked in the genome of A. parasiticus SUI. Since the vervl and the 3.2-kb Sad-BamHI probes lie within a IZ-kb duplication of the region containing ver-l and aflR in the genome of SUI (33. 48). additional bands of the predicted size appeared in the genomic DNA analyzed with these probes (ver-l probe. 8.9-kb fragment; 3.2okb Sad-BamHI probe. 8.9- and 6.5-kb fragments; see Fig. 28 for schematic). Transcript map of cosmid NorA. The appearance of nor-I and vet-I transcripts occurs simultaneously in A. pamsiricus SUI under difl'crent growth conditions, suggesting that they are coordinately regulated in part at the transcriptional level (49). Since the two genes were found to be linked on the chromosome. a transcript mapping analysis of this 35-kb region was initiated to determine the size. location. and pattern of expression of other genes in the region. Genes with expression patterns similar to those of nor-l and ver-l would be studied further because of the potential for direct involvement in AFB] synthesis. RNA was isolated at distinct time points from mycelia of aflatoxin-producing A. parrm'ii'cus SUI grown in YES or Reddy's medium (which induces AFBI synthesis). The time courses of aflatoxin production and accumulation of my- celial dry mass were qualitatively similar in the two media (Fig. 3C and D). The maximum rate of fungal growth occurred between I8 and 36 h after inoculation. whereas the maximum rate of aflatoxin synthesis occurred between 48 and 72 h. when growth had slowed considerably in a transition between active growth and stationary phase. Radiolabelled DNA probes (numbered I to 12 in Fig. I) were used to analyze RNA isolated at various times during fungal growth in YES or Red- dy's medium. Northern analysis identified the size, location. and pattern of accumulation of 14 transcripts in the region encompassed by cosmid NorA (Fig. 38. Northern analyses; and Fig. I. transcript map). Transcript accumulation in Reddy's and YES media. The pattern of expression observed for genes known to be involved in AFBI biosynthesis (nor-l. vet-I. and M8) in Reddy's me- dium (a chemically defined medium) showed very little tran- script accumulation at the l8«h point and a high level of tran- script accumulation betwecn 36 and 84 h (Fig. 3A). Eight transcripts in the gene cluster (from left to right in Fig. I: 113 2668 TRAILEI'AL A B. ‘ ”a i u ' ('qu Co—idNo'A _l—.21‘5——J L__W.. l I cI—avm ......... ._uu_LLI._.I_ ....... I I "m LJJ-kb‘ I g l l l I I '—-——zzn—J L—ztatII——' I I l I n . C . . I l 1_—l Lib L654“ ‘—-l9~t¥-‘ .— ll'hysial linkage between the nor- I and try-I genes. (A) Southern hybriIliu-ii aha lysis-If Xhulcul gem-mu: DNA A. (FNIIIKI m SUI (lam hes 2 III 4) III XIII-cut eusmid NorA Ala( fit: I and S)' Thef wing radiolabelled were used1nw-l (lane. land 2). Iw-l (lat: 4 and 5). and the I'ILLCJ' nu“ L ‘ e guru”: . ingthenur- I‘ Indtrv-I genes s(lane .1; sex parcel II). The four dasltalothe left of la III (top to bottom III) the [Inilllns III 111 . v.4 . 6.033 44- III IIurdlll rcl'ZrictiInI fragments of lambda DNA used as a sire standard (ll) \'Iul cosmids- Nor :ln‘fld Ver2. and IheA Ill genomic cluster I“ l in panel A is shown The l9— lIh Mull restrhion lrlagrhenl Ill cosmid NurA Is ‘lhtn rcual ar nature of IhI ANIn-vtalums are given in the legend to Fig I Unlamlled restriciinrt Q“: are Iu'uRl Ult‘ genc~l. 0.9 kb; gene-2. 0.5, I.25. L65. 0.75. and L7 kh) showed a pattern of accumulation similar to that of nor-I, wr-l. and uvmfl. The data from Imr-l. tw-I. uvmli. and gene-l are shown in Fig 3A to illustrate the transcript accumulation of these eight genes. In contrast the accumulation of transcriptsh for a gene associated with primary metabolism m(UTPb synthesis) was observed to be high at the Ill-h time point. Transcripts of benA (encoding B~tubulin) showed nearly uni- form accumulation at all time points, including 18 h as would be expected of a uselteeping gene. The I. l and 2.2-kb tran- scripts(afl R)showed transcript accumulation patterns similar othat of pyrG (data not shown). It Is not known whether the gene encoding the l. l -ltb transcript is involved in secondary meta ism; however uflR has been reported to be a posith regulator of several genes in AFB] synthesis (55) so the ap- of this transcript before t as: of nor-I and ver‘l Is not unexpected The 4. 4-kb transcript was present in very small quantities at all time points and encompassed the same region of DNA as aflR. The nature of this transcript is not clear. 0 determine whether the type of growth medium influ~ enocd the relative expression of these two diflerent groups of genes (i.e.. AFBl-relatcd genes versus primary metabolism or Am. ENVIRON. MICROBIOL housekeeping genes). the time course of expression in YES a “ric IcAh"A-FB1 icindu etgn medium, was also analyzed (Fig SB) The contrast between8 the pattern of expression of nor-I. wr-l uvm8, and the eight AFBI- related genes and the expression of pyrGan be is even more striking Transcripts of the AFB]- related genes first appeared In the 40-h sample during a tran~ sition from active growth to “stationery phase" and decreased significantly by 72 h. In contrast transcripts of pyrG and benA were expressed at the highest levels during active growth (first appearing in the Ill-h sample) and did not decrease until 24“ to 40 h after inoculation. as growth slowed. both YESa Reddy s media. heappearance of transcripts "of AFB! -related genes correlated well with the first appearance of AFB! In the culture. Recombinational inactivation of gene-l. 11m pattern of ex- pression of eight transcripts in cosmid NorA (in addition to nor-l. ver-l, and uvm8) was observed to correlate well with FBI synthesis. suggesting that the genes encoding them are involved in AFBI synthesis. To test this hypothesis. gene-l. encoding a 7-kb transcript (whose function was unknown), was disrupted by insertion of pAPNVES43 (schematic in Fig. 4) which contained an internal fragment of the transcribed region chromosome should result in insertion of the entire pAPN- V843 vector into gene-l. inactivating its function. pAPNVES43 was used to transform A. parasilicu: CSIO, a VA-accumulating strain. In two separate experiments. l(l% of the pyrG ‘ colonies did not accumulate a yellow pigment (in— dicativc of loss of VA production) on CAM. No transfon'nants were obtained when DNA was not present in the transforma- tion mixture and no transformants lost their ability to produce the yellow pigment (VA) when pPGIlJ carrying only the pyrG selectable marker. was used as a control plasm TIJC analysis of transformants Three transformants that no longer appear ed to accumulate VA on CA and a known VA-ziccumulating strain. ATCC 36537, were Mgrown in YES medium (:Iilatoxin inducing) for further analysis. TLC analyses of extracts of mycelial mats and the growth medium confirmed a loss sfo VA production in all three transformed strains (Fig 5) whereas normal levels of VA were observed In the control strain ATCC. 537 grown under identical conditions No af- latoxin production was noted tn either the transformants or the control strain. No new pigments appeared to accumulate in the putative gcnc- l-disrupted transformants. Genetic anal. vege-e-I disruptant clones. South- ern hybridization analysis“ was performed on genomic DNA isolated from the parental strain. C810. a five putative gene~l disruptants (strains that no longer accumulated VA) (Fig. 6). A lll.2~kh EcoRI genomic DNA fragment hybridized to the pUC l9 probe (0.8-kb Seal-EcoRI). as expected, in four of five transfortnants (lanes 2. 4. S. and 6) and to a 3—kb fragment in the fifth transformant (Fig. 6. lane 3; see also schematic in Fig. 4). The occurrence of the 3—kb DNA frag- ment is likely due to genetic rearrangement during or after integration of the disruption vector. The l0.2-kb fragment was absent in the parental strain (lane I), as expected. An addi- tional 8- kb fragment was present in two transformants (lanes 2 and 6) indicating that the disruption vector integrated at one other site. Identical DNAsa samples were also hybn ridized to a gene- l probe (0.6-kit Smal-Sacl fragment shown in Fig. 4) located adjacent to the l.6-ltb gene-l fragment carried on pAPNVES43. The expected Ill-kl) DNA fragment hybridized to this gene-l probe in four of the trartsfonned strains (Fig. (1. lanes 8. It). I l. and l2), indicating insertion of pAPNVES43 by a single crossover at the homologous gene-l locus on the VOL. 6|. 1995 A. Reddy's medium. nor-l 114 AHATOXIN GENE CLUSTER IN A. PARASITTCUS verJA to 36 a so u as 1.1 “.O... 7.0 4‘ "16 l 103640600496 10364060 0496 :x““~ M ' 1.4 “all!!! B.Vl-Suediun. nor.1 ver.1A 1019244072 1016244072 . \".('~ 1.3 '.$ 1.1 C 7.0 ”'0 mun l i 10 16 24 40 72 10 16 24 40 72 1.4 u - O Q an .yf C. 0. mm mm 3” an auto -..° W" 250-1 »au 1‘ m‘ »ano i” i * 2 a i g'“-‘ P‘. t S m. 8 ° 5 a i 5 ‘ g 0 as F” g m. “-1 10~ 0 too ° 0 a: :4 1 . fl 1 ° o t: at aa a an n 04 MM FIG. 3. Accumulation oi transcripts oi genes in the AFBI cluster during lutch limitation/1. Mu NRRL W was inundated into Reddy's medium and YES medium (time mm) and grown with shakingat arc. Sampleswre removed at the indicated timesloreatractinn oltotal RNA‘an-lysisdmycelial dryweight and allatoxin. Northern analyses at the RNA extracted (rum samples groom in Rcddy‘s (A) and YES (8) media were done with the W min [or hyhridiuliun shim in Fig l and descriied in Materials and Methods Hybridization tom-G and B-tuhulin genes (eontmls) is also shim. I'mductinn d M and mycelial dry weights are shown in panels C (Reddy‘s medium) and 0 (YES medium). Vertical liars indiate standard errors oi the mean. chromosome. The presence of a larger fragment in lane 9 and the absence of a lO-ltb fragment support the genetic rearrange- ment argument proposed for the same DNA sample probed with pUCl9 (lane 2). The probe hybridized to the expected 112-lib EcoRI genomic DNA fragment in CSIO. DNA samples were also hybridized to a pyrG gene probe. which confirmed that the disruption vector was inserted by a single-crossover event into gene-l (data not shown). The complete hybridiza- tion analysis was repeated with genomic DNA cut with EcoRV and Sacl (data not shown). These data confirmed the results observed for the EcoRI digests. Sclerotlum production. Two gene-l disruptant clones (Tfl and TR) as well as strains SUI (aflatoxin accumulating). ATCC 24690 (NA accumulating; small quantities of AFB! are also produwd), ATCC 24551 (AVF accumulating). and ATCC 36537 (VA accumulating) were inoculated onto CAM and grown for l4 days at 30°C. These strains could be divided into three distinct groups on the basis of levels of sclerotia produced (Table l). Gene-l disruptants (which do not ac- cumulate AFBl or identifiable pathway intermediates) pro- duced about three to six times the quantity of sclerotia pro. duced by the wild type. SUI. The NA (an early pathway intemediateyaccumulating strain produced quantities of scle- rotia similar to those produwd by SUI. while the two strains that accumulated the pathway intermediates VA and AVF (intermediates near the middle of the pathway) and produced H5 2670 TRAIL ET AL t. Sad [all S-aI [call M DNA ' _ Int-I [all Isol' lul' E4011 W n: I. ._:M I H hf." I M WA. F _... FIG. 4. Strategy for disruption of gene Apr-aim. ion maps of thed eruption Inveet it pAP’NVES41I (top) the gene- I region est-0‘ the eruption event (bottom) are (min Also indiatcld: are the pBlmwiInSKIk—m ) vector (with the Amp' gene). the region of gene vector (Mad rs.) and flanking regions (open hail ).‘Die position of the Sad milfragrnentusedlthotIther nana Iysisisindiatedhyamlidlinchclowlhi: periotntc DNA no detectable AFBI failed to produce sclerotia or produced vry ew sc erot DISCUSSION Herc. evidence is presented that several genes involved in AFBI biosynthesis (nor-I. ver-l. afiR. «Mill, and gene-l) are physically linked on cosmid NorA and In the chromoso f A pamsI'lI'cu: SUI. The 0011- I gene has also been linked to this cluster of genes in A parui'imui and A flaw: (57). Nucleotide sequence analysis of this entire gene cluster in A. [mmsiticux and a structurally similar (but not identical) gene cluster in A. nI’dIIIaIIi is progressing. DNA sequence analysis of the entire region will allow identification of open reading frames. which may provide clues about the possible function of the seven other AFBI- related gcnc cs It is not surprising that the aflatoxin genes wou uld be ar- ranged in a cluster in the genome of AsptrgiIIILr organisms." been found to be clustered. For example. genes biosynthesis of penicillin (2| 42). lrichothecenes (26). and Ant. ENVIRON. Micaootm. 1234‘07I0fi1112 —211 - . — ~-- ".. —u C 9 >1 ~' _ '4. 4‘ —M FIG. 6. Southern hybridintion analysiaofgenomic DNA inflated front the disrupted traiuforrnanta. DNA was cut with EcoRI and separated on a 01% agarmegel.l.anesland7A.pIIt-sumllo517. lanaZtoPTAandlltull. transform “unmixed with pAPNVFjIJ. A radiolabelledD Afrlgrnent of POUCI - :1.“ l mt. smut . ‘)was toprrbe aniden min Iatlc‘s7tol2. TheDNAaiu markers indiated on the rightul are froma I Hiiidlll dips! of hacteriuphap Iarnhda. Filrnwaseapusedforldaysal- melanin (30) were all recently found to be clustered. What advantage gene clustering affords the producing organism is not clear. but one can imagine a selective advantage to having genes of like function clustered together on a chic oniosomc f clustering Is I1related to regulation of gene citpresion. ational inactivation of gene- I provides the first indication that this gene is directly involved In afiatoxin bio- synt thesis and sets a precedent that other genes in the cluster. which are expressed in a pattern similar to those of nor- -l and yer-I (AFBI- re-lated genes) are aha) prime candidates to be gene-l remains undescribe research approaches provide clues about its function. Nucle- otide sequence comparisons between the proposed amino acid sequences in two distinct regions of gene- I and proteins in the EMBL and GenBank database libraries were made. using computer-assisted analyses (Wisconsin Genetics Computer Group; TFastA and MOTIFS). High degrees of similarity (XIV/6) and identity (64%) were observed between a IOU-ami- no—acid domain in the gene-l protein sequence and the fl-kc~ toacyl- acyl carrier protcin- synthase (Fig. 7A) functional do— main of the A. nidulam wA gene (4|). a polyketide synthase gene (PKS) involved in conidial pigment mtbesis. The two other proteins that showed high identity in the same region spectivcly (Fig. 7A). A significant level of identity (20 to 32%) was sobscrvcd In the acyltransferase functional domains of the TABLE I. Sclerotium production In various strains of icurgrown on CAM f I4days g - Intermediate No. of sclerotia . rain' _ mutating "I". t Plate 1 Tfl NU 5.020 1qu m ”D 6.06 5.713 24690 NA 1.242 I.m2 24551 AVF 0 0 36537 VA 36 5 no 5 TLCanaIysisof, , . -—-— I “ ‘ ‘ ' J SUI AFBI 983 I.7Iti ATCC 1607 It. - L I . . . ‘ .5 7.x (lanes II to I9) are shown VA (Ianc I) was used as a standard fir plates were ndphotographed under long wave UV light ' Strain 245.“ is derived from ATCC ISSI7 (24): all others are SUI deriva- "ND. not detected. A Beta-Ketoacyl ACP Synthase 116 zoo ooa F.- DU: “(2‘ «Ii-o arms m as. In» a = . a 2 a a a 2 {tn g In 0 c r: t: 0< * at 3 * o¢ o< o< 33E“ 5: ‘ 3 E? E! E3 '._3 “a 3 a F; Pg ,2 I-cvfl 3': a L o o . gas :it P :2“ =2“ :2“ 05.135 .5 ‘ .. 03‘ 03‘ 03‘ =22: '2 E a “3%" 9%“ 9%“ dca- d‘ 0 ¢ 9.: 4 a n.: ((uivi dd «6 . <