133 318 THS PRQPAGAHQN C)? A fiGUNE PEJLSE EM 13¢ MEfiEUM WETH [a CGMPLZX ELASTSC .‘iGBULfiS Thesis for fine Degree 91‘ Ph. D. MlCHIGAN STATE CGLLEGE Saiah izzai‘ Tahsén 1953 Thlsiltoeenlfgthat the thesis entitled ‘ _ ”Dqum... 4 a 3......\ P4“. : ”.2. a. My...“ uldk .. Q... Wmmsm Mum $4“ Ieaad TL... r has been accepted towards fulfillment * of the requirements for 3 Major professor Date “N. \O Salah Izzat Tahsin Candidate for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Final examination: 3-5 p.m., Friday, November 20, 1953, Room 314 P.M. Building Dissertation: Propagation of a Sound Pulse in a Medium with A Complex Modulus Outline of Studies: Major Subject: Physics Minor Subject: Mathematics Biographical Items: Born, Feb}. 10, 1917, Baghdad, Iraq Undergraduate Studies, Am. U. of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon, 1938-1941. Graduate Studies, Michigan State College, 1949-1953. Experience: Teacher of physics in secondary schools of Iraq, 1941-1948. Member of the Society of Sigma Xi, Sigma Pi Sigma, Pi Mu Epsilon. PROPAGATION OF A SOUND PULSE IN A MEDIUM WITH A COMPLEX ELASTIC MODULUS BY SALAH IZ ZAT TAHSIN A THESIS Submitted to the School of Graduate Studies of Michigan State College of Agriculture and Applied Science in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOC TOR OF PHILOSOPHY Department of Physic s 1953 ACKNOWLEDGMENT I wish to express my gratitude to Professor R. D. Spence for suggesting the problem and for his continuous help in every phase of this work. PROPAGATION OF A SOUND PULSE IN A MEDIUM WITH A COMPLEX ELASTIC MODULUS by Salah Izzat Tahsin AN ABSTRACT Submitted to the School of Graduate Studies of Michigan State College of Agriculture and Applied Science in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOC TOR OF PHILOSOPHY Department of Physic 5 Year 1953 App roved :2 D 3%“,01 SALAH IZZAT TAHSIN ABSTRACT In the first part of this thesis, the physical causality prin- ciple along with the assumption that a real (not complex) cause gives rise to a real effect, is used to derive the following proper- ties of the complex propagation constant k(u) _ . 1. It is analytic in the lower half of the complex u-plane. Z. Lim kiu)=% as u_.(n , 3. Its real and imaginary parts satisfy the Kronig-Kramers relations. 4. It. possesses symmetry properties; i.e., RT) = -k(-fi) . where the bar represents the complex conjugate. The second part of this thesis discusses the propagation of a plane wave pulse in an infinite, homogeneous, and isotropic medium whose elastic modulus is assumed to be represented by a simple form consistent with the relaxation theory of the elastic moduli. Since the Fourier integral which occurs in this problem cannot be evaluated exactly, two approximate methods are employed to find the shape of the pulse. The precursors of the pulse are shown to be exponential in form, negative for w°<>‘/-,-t!I , where (a) is the amplitude of the relaxing part of the modulus and (T) is the relaxation time. TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION .............................. PART I. FUNCTION THEORETICAL CONDITIONS ON THE PROPAGATION CONSTANT OF A SOUND WAVE .................. . .................. PART II. THE PROPAGATION OF A SOUND PULSE IN A RELAXING MEDIUM ....................... Evaluation of Integral (20) ..................... Case 'I ................................ Case II ................................ Mapping the complex plane ................. Location of the saddle points ................. The integration path ........... ’ ............ Discussion of the solutions (29) and (39) ......... The pulse ............................ . CONCLUSION .......... ' ...................... 12 14 17 21 22 Z4 Z9 35 36 43 45 C i 54. IN TR ODU C TION This thesis is divided into two parts. In Part I we shall find some properties of the propagation constant applying the causality principle and the assumption that a real (not complex) cause gives use to a real effect. In Part II we shall discuss the prOpagation of a plane sound wave in a dispersive medium, charac- terized by a complex propagation constant. Before we start the work on this thesis, we would like to give a brief account of what has been done in connection with the principles we are going to use. The physical causality principle, namely that the effect cannot precede the cause, has been, in various equivalent forms, the reason in establishing some properties of many physical constants. Upon the suggestion of Kro'nig (1), Shfitzer and Tiomno (2) analyzed the relation between causality and the scattering matrix 5. They found that, for the causality principle to apply, the analytic function S(k) must have its singularities either in the lower half plane or on the imaginary axis. The same principle is believed to be the deep cause of the properties of Wigner's function (3) R (the reciprocal logarithmic derivative of the wave function). Van Kampen (4) worked on the same relation and found more properties of the S-matrix for the scattering of the electromagnetic field by a fixed center and for nonrelativistic particles. E. Hiedemann and R. D. Spence (5), by applying the causality principle and using function theory methods, obtained the Kronig-Kramers relations (6) between the real and imaginary parts of the complex elastic modulus K. They further - found that the singularities of K must lie in the upper half of the complex frequency plane. Sommerfeld (7) and Brillouin (8) discussed the propagation of light in dispersive media and established the presence of ”pre— cursors” or forerunners to the main pulse. They showed that the first precursor travels in any optical medium with the velocity of light in vacuum. The propagation function for light waves used by Brillouin leads to pure resonance phenomena. In our work in Part II we Will use a propagation constant for sound waves that lead to pure relaxation phenomena. The mathematical difference between the two phenomena will be discussed at the end of Part I. PART I FUNCTION THEORETICAL CONDITIONS ON THE PROPAGATION CONSTANT OF A SOUND WAVE In this portion we define the propagation constant and present a discussion of its most general properties. Let a pulse be applied at the plane x = O in an infinite, homogeneous and isotropic medium. The amplitude of the pulse in this plane is given by f 0 (<0 (1) f where {(0,1‘) is a real quantity. The frequency spectrum of the {(0.19 5 %0 pulse is then. go and («[I— §£(u)]7' a. -—)eo‘> c' D where D is also a finite constant. This leads us to the result +41... .17.. m) “a” r c c7. "’2“ (12) which shows that the undetermined constant (c) is the velocity of propagation as the frequency tends to infinity. By virtue of (8), (12) shows also that kfll) 4, 1 (12a) ll—Pw (up - f‘IUIJT 4' [7(a) g' [“(Wayl 4- iflfldfi'l] e Let Q = e ' . -/3. . . " e and +4? ma = 3 +ul I Upon the application of the Cauchy—Riemann conditions on A 0! and A , and after some simple algebra, we obtain 25-2.4 ' a~._a 9w'3v and 57 3g ’ which proves the analyticity of FY“). We can also write £007.: aT-Ffl‘) to Show that (mu is analytic, since the sum of analytic functions is analytic. Making use of relation (8) and following the method of E. Hiedemann and R. D. Spence (5), we obtain the following: (“L‘- “21) 5b) )hfF/w“ KW) “ du. (13a) 5:91). a 41—91. .___ aloe (13b) «2 (aha/'0 moo) .. 1 -.. _I_/___k"(“) an. (14) 77' u K’au 2 Ken) 4- #jk'lu) ..._~£_.. du. (15) ul_wl The above four forms of the Kronig-Kramer relations can be supplemented by the following four forms if we assume that K(“) possesses no singularities on the real frequency axis other than the o rigin 10 , co K1212 = £32. + 3.1” m._al_ 51/“ (16a) w w 77' a (60-40” .59.! : _ .2. P 4’7“). “ a/ 16 w W U (u‘-w‘) “ ( b) w Kurd-K10); _ .2. j K’” 021. (17) 77' a klw) =K(oo)+_2_P {mu—“— d“ (18) . 7" (a ‘-W") where (P) stands for the Cauchy principal value. Equations (13a), (13b), (14), and (15), as well as the last four relations, make clear the reciprocal dependence of the real and imaginary parts of (RI). The singularities of K(u) have been shown to lie in the upper half plane. The effect of such singularities on the propagation con- stant may conveniently be discussed on the basis of whether they lie on or off the positive imaginary axis. The singularities which lie off the imaginary axis physically represent resonance phenomena such as occurs in diSpersion of light waves in optical media and which are almost never present 11 in sonic media. The singularities which occur on the positive imaginary axis represent relaxation processes and lead to the type of dispersion found in many sonic problems and in electromagnetic waves of long wavelength. Throughout the remainder of this thesis we shall assume that all the singularities of Kt“) lie on the positive imaginary axis. PART II THE PROPAGATION OF A SOUND PULSE IN A RELAXING MEDIUM In this portion of the thesis we consider the propagation of a plane wave pulse in a medium characterized by a complex prop- agation constant which arises from a complex elastic modulus. We assume, as in Part I, an infinite, homogeneous and iso— tropic medium. The pulse applied at the plane X20 is given by {(6) :0 ('(0 ,é>A f“) =44" (4.1" 0 IA tell where “AH? .51- and A = m .. p is the period and m is an integer. Mp, The Fourier transform of {(Z') is A -; -4“ (9(a) =/Mw,[' e c!!- a A (TEL-‘0‘! -‘:(wo+“)t =:/_§ a2 dé O (19) 26 zrrc'm -££:—:"~u vzfl'im -£’_"_‘£Zu ___!_ e e -I + e e ’ -:_ 2( (“do ‘“) an). +u) . mm“ 13 "‘ «I. / rpm) .-.- w. e " (I'M-6d} The amplitude of the pulse observed at a point X=I50 at a time (t) is given by . “a ('[al‘ - hm] font) ”iii/(Pm) e 0’“ ~00 +oo -——— _«_/._ - e do: (201 177' (flu-6d,?- ~00 : L+Iz ( if“! aha) x] ([uu - A) - km) 1:] e 1 To find an expression for ‘02) we assume that the relaxing modulus of elasticity may be represented by M(«) = Mano) (1— liar) Where (a) is a constant characteristic of the medium and('Z'/ is the relaxation time. This is the simplest form of the complex modulus which can be employed to exhibit the effect of relaxation on the propagation of the pulse. More general representations would include the contributions from a spectrum (discrete and/or continuous) of relaxation times. In actual practice it is often found that the previous expression for the modulus suffices over a fairly wide frequency range. 14 As was shown previously, (C) is the velocity of propagation as (0.) tends to infinity, thus we write c 4.47.221. and q; .,. /M(a) D "”1: where D is the density of the medium and (1!) is the complex velocity associated with the frequency (u) . By definition the complex propagation is h €— Similar results apply for iu(5-— {3) , 5: l ._ A 15 x When t < E- Both I, and I2 vanish along a path deep below the real axis. When .5. E L‘. c < < c + A In this case the integration path has to be moved up to the upper half-plane. In so doing, the path encounters the singularities at u at“), and the branch cut and branch points, if any, of the func- tion 4(a) . These, as was assumed earlier, lie on the positive imaginary axis. Figures 1 and Z Show the paths for I, and II. The contribution of those parts of the path around the singularities two are easily found by Cauchy's theorem. For this case we obtain —‘“(“)0) " £- - h I, = e :19» wai— Hum] +;'— Li’zL. e 0‘ JQa’u (23) 11:0 When f>—é-+A In this case I, still has the value (23), and It becomes (:(tlg -- ‘5) e —£?WO)X I,2 -.- — e MPJ -l:'(w.)x] - {if/fli— 6!“ (24) C , (flu-w." Thus in this case the main pulse cancels. Only the integrals in (2.3) and (24) remain. The integral in (23) will be discussed fully later. The integral in (24), however, starts when the main pulse e e —>w -UJo +wa .5. K C are >— Figure 1. The integration path for I, , eq. (20). V t>€~+ A v V [j .%_. V , '1- a C L “r ._ t.\ A.\ w v U T” “we +wo Riga-A \ a: as Figure 2. The integration path for 12 , eq. (20). l7 vanishes and is of the same form as the integral in (23) except for the sign. Since we are mainly interested in the manner of build-up of the pulse, we shall, in the following, devote our attention to the integral in (23), namely ' f-fi LIMEL ed“ ’0 a’u (25) C 277 a‘-%‘ 1 .0. The contour C! can be deformed into other paths, such as the one shown in Figure 3, after reorienting the branch cut. However, the evaluation will not be carried out along C’ or the latter alternative path. Instead two approximate methods will be used. One for «2,, << % and the other for Cd. >> 7?: . Case I. (do << 4?: We first make the following changes in our variable €=¢r=P+C7 9 and set ai—lzx. $41— .9 -(k—C-i—n = 55:51”— k; , an ’3 —§ --§- 1:55— .— ) o d K .é at 'c': (1%)“: / Now consider integral (25) in terms of the new variable. where [-*=[- .. nix ’Q 18 . I- O : 4* U (I) T k F K . \E J) ”‘0’ + '- N P (A) Figure 3. Alternate path for integral (25). _ I} u a P 7 Figure 4. Integration path for integral (26) and its equivalent. 19 P “$6 - K‘a/éx) [(2949: -25? 21.32., e (26) Y where ‘7' is the path shown in Figure 4, along with two more equiva- lent paths. Foré )>l , we can write , ‘C-(PZ) act c‘r‘ Let now . .s. a ’ .. aw) 6 2c? and “ th'(a 9' 7 then . 6 ‘ aer' —5x ‘(T'f "' ) _ P. 1 5 [ow - - n. e .9. 6 0'5 . f3. «)5! (27) Y . We write g); «at _ (“(5. J; .. :5. a: r g 1‘ xx 3 1 Let v —(-0- (a- __§_E%.=le and égfia-ie (28) then ét' .. “"T = 2" Fax (.010- 20 Now onU') “F E, :: Re multiplying by TL 25—),- , we obtain ' . 7r .. r--— $77 "r7". Pe‘he“ " from<28> _L._t_‘_ R = R = r/“x r xx I or 7‘..— l I" u'a- a d _ ._ .______. n E! ' axr‘ Function (27) now becomes -ex €42.”de Cavr+r) ‘C’ «tx 2—77'0 -ex _ 4 zé—lfi—e .(‘L(2L/£“X) (29) For small values of (a) we can write _ l -9. ‘ ~ _____..Q or ' zct’i(a ‘f'a _ let" then -——(5—-x {01.0.13 /-3—(€-/) e “r "1(1'3-5)‘ [—(9-0) (30) where 9:55: - For very small (9-!) , (1,03) :1 ——£—y , so that in this case we can write /(x,H-.- _w,-g— e “r -(6’-/) (31) 21 To get an idea of the orders of magnitude, let us take .5' —6 5' a=0.1 , C=/.5K10 (rm/sec. , T: 10 sec. , LU, = /0 C-/sec. Then for (0-!) of the order of 10-2, f(x,{) is of the order of ~3 . . . la . This is a very small magnitude compared to that of the pulse. The interval of validity of expression (30) is obtained from the condition in (27), i.e. F. —. _. 95:5 Po <7 _ T For this case we need to use the saddle point method. This method is used because of the difficulty the function hat) presents in a conventional evaluation. We have already defined the propaga— tion function as k(u) =.‘£.k(u) :3. /*i“: See (8) and (21). C C (1*“)+Lu.r 22 Thus 4(a) has two branch points, one of the type of a pole at u 35-51—23 and an ordinary branch point at “=54. . The first of these points presents an essential singularity of the integrand which renders the evaluation impractical. An approx- imate nethod (the saddle point method) will be discussed in the following. The complex u-plane will be surveyed as to the negative do- mains of the real part of the exponent for varying(€). Saddle points of the exponent will be located and shown to shift with time. The ‘path of integration will be made to run in the negative domains, passing through saddle points whenever it goes from one negative domain to the neighboring one. The integral will have negligible values along most of the path. It yields an appreciable value only when it goes through a saddle point, where the real part is not too negative. The shifting with time of the saddle points forces the path to intersect the poles and thus give rise to the main pole. Mapping the complex plane. The integral to be evaluated is integral (25). We rewrite the integral in terms of the new variable 23 .1. We§[g-K(€)] I P. (I -{7}. 27:2? 8 J45, (32) cl Let now we; = .' efa-Kzan .- X(,o.7) +z Y(,a.7) where X(,0.7)= —- 79 +7Em(wgfi) +Pf-ETAJ.‘ (ii—fl) (33a) Y‘W= P9 -ff-%i:““(i§-f‘) WE” (fig-‘52) <3”) r, afiu- (7-1)‘ , r; a/l;+[7-(I-dl]‘ if}: 5:14.151. . , (fl: andI-Ig-a} It was shown earlier that K(§) 2:?» 1, so that for large &, we can write ME.) = if. (6-!) = rpm-I) - 7119-!) Then Xz-ll(9-I) behaves as follows at infinity For 9> £25: Figure 11 is.the same as Figure 6 with the addition of less negative ridges in the negative domains and the integration path. The integration path is (—oo)fadcd'6{'(+ao) , made to pass through Sfiddle points whenever possible. For €) E, as we are considering in this case. Taking all constant terms out of the integration sign we get i’lflé ) +6 x a 1 Ct ‘ -227.er (£3)! 6 .. Be , 1 e de (38) me. 437 -€ 1/(55) is always negative and 7/15,) is of the order of ID“ for a =0.l . If now we choose X= Icm° : C=/o53’oacm'/5€¢o and __1 u T: ’0 sec. or smaller. The order of magnitude of fil’V(51)|is 34 about (3) or larger. This value of the exponent makes most of the contribution come from a very small interval about the saddle point. Thus, extending the limits of integration to infinity does not alter the result appreciably. In so doing we obtain the result -Ex?)v> )a.)‘ An expression for the maximum value of (£351 is obtained by setting (€‘-/) equal to zero in equation (35). The result is sim— plified considerably if we note that (a) is usually very small com- pared to unity. After some simplifications we obtain the following expression for as Max. lé’maxJ = Cl + J; Now fi> Cl , so that we can write ,9 » fa“ or w, » Lg: WhiCh is the condition of validity we stated for this case. 35 Qiscussion of the solutions (29) and (3_l. Expression (31) shows a linear dependence of f(x,t) on (6) for very small (0-/) . However, for large ((9-0 expression (29) decreases exponentially and rapidly with increasing (5) . This ex— ponential decrease of the function continues until the function loses its validity according to the condition _ .9:— 9 /<< 1’0, obtained earlier. To find the order of magnitude of the function for values of (€-/) restricted by the above condition, we assume 61-70.], It: -.- o./ , 1': la-‘sec. , x =1 Icm. and Ca- I.SXI05cm./3¢c. . These values require that €-/<< 5 . Let us choose €~/=a.05' , then from (29) we get font) of the order of [0-3 which is very small compared to the amplitude of the pulse. We will show later that it is not possible to determine exactly the time of build-up of an observable pulse. However, to be safe in applying expression (29), W8 should assume a very small (9-!) in accord with the above con- dition. This in turn limits the amplitude of the function to very Small values until the arrival of the pulse. It can easily be seen from expression (30) and the condition on(€-/) that, within the limits 0f Validity, an increase in(/:) decreases the absolute value of the func tion. 36 Expression (39), on the other hand, builds up exponentially from a finite nonzero value at 9==/ . It reaches a maximum at a certain (9) which is a function off?) alone. The amplitude, in- cluding that .of the maximum,is a function of both (,9) and ( T) , it changes directly with (T) and inversely with {/3 ) . The difference in sign between the two expressions (29) and (39) is expected because of the factor ETC-:33 which changes sign a as '5' assumes values smaller and larger than (’00). Figurel3 shows three plots of (39) versus (a) for f: -_-_/0 and three differ-: ent values of (T). - The contributions of both expressions (29) and (39) are usually referred to as the "precursors" or ”forerunners” to the observable pulse, which will be discussed next. lhe pulse. We have shown in the last section that the amplitude of the precursor is very small compared to the pertaining pulse. We also Stated that, the moment the integration path crosses a pole, the amplitude builds up to a noticeable value. Theoretically, the pulse arrives at the plane tho with a Velocity (C) , the maximum velocity. This is certainly true of those “fix,” 7' - l0 0.: «» ii f(Xal’ 0.051» 1': l0"7 ® 11 Aff(XaI) T: 10-. 0.011 ‘- ‘7 9=I 14 Figure 13. Plots of expression (39) versus (9) for three values of('t') aides/0. k ‘9 38 Fourier components of the pulse with the highest frequencies. These, however, do not constitute the bulk of the components con- stituting the pulse. Most of the components have lower frequencies and hence lower velocities compared to (C) . The whole set of components can be subdivided into groups of different average frequencies which move with different average velocities. The "group velocity” 72"? is defined by the relation .L-i’ :Td—A, ) 40 113"“:‘M’ JP (,0 () where (6(a)) is a function of the real average frequencymu and is the real part of km». The group of frequency components centered on («2.) arrives .9. 15? Thus (6?) is the ratio of the maximum velocity to the group velocity. at the plane X4=0 at t: 3; , and since 6:35- , at 9:19} = Figure 14 is a plot of((€/) as a function off/o). This was obtained from (21) according to the definition (40). The figure shows that((%) approaches unity as the frequency tends to infinity. In other Words, as the frequency increases, the group velocity approaches the maximum velocity. It is not possible to find a reasonable definition for the pulse Velocity in a medium for reasons that will become clear later. However, it is evident from the past discussion that the pulse 13.11:..Lh 7L 1“ v: “.02- 39 [.3 .0: .4 1.2' I-O ’ 4 — a- a 0.5 LG LG P V Figure 14. 5’ as a function of(/D)(solid curves). Broken curve represents (6) as a function of gaff. 4O velocity must not exceed the group velocity. We now make the as- sumption that the pulse velocity is only slightly smaller than the group velocity. This is especially true for high and low frequen- cies; it is not so true for frequencies lying in the region of anomaly. The broken line in Figure 14 represents the limit of validity of both (29) and (39). Expression (29) is valid in a region to the right of the point of intersection of 'the broken line with the (9; curve for a certain value of (a) . Expression (39), on the other hand, is valid in a region to the left of the points of intersection. The figure yields the following useful information. First, the interval of validity of (29) increases with increasing (a) . Second, 9} is smaller for (39) than it is for (29). Taking notice of our assumption in the preceding paragraph, we conclude that the signal arrives earlier when (39) is used than it does when (29) is used. Usually the constant (a) is of the order of [0—2, which means that 6; is very small as can be seen from Figure 14. Thus our choice, in a previous section, of 6 : [.05 t0 find the order 0f magnitude of (29), was rather generous. Nevei'theless, (29) was found to be Very small compared to the pulse. 41 Figures 15 and 16 are schematic representations of what happens at the plane X4=0 , using expressions (29) and (39) respec- J‘. .5. (15,: tively. Until l' = ‘2" nothing happens, at I": v =5 3 I ”I- pulse velocity), the pulse builds up very rapidly to its full ampli- tude. Nothing was said, so far, about the decay of the pulse. In equation (20) we had two integrals I, and 12. These two integrals are identical except for their sign and their lower time limits. A was picked such that 12 starts in phase with I, , but the difference in sign puts them completely out of phase and leads to the destruc‘ tion of the pulse. Thus I2 yields the same contributions as I, , only the former leads to a trailing phenomenon instead of the precursor. This tail phenomenon, not being of any special value, is not shown in Figures 15 and 16. From Figure 14 we can easily establish that, for the same(Cu), the pulse arrives earlier the larger (T) is. Figure 13, on the other hand, shows earlier maxima for larger T3. Thus we find that the rise of (39) to its maximum value Occurs at the same range of (%)for the pulse arrival. In Figure 16 We let the pulse build up from the maximum value of (39). 42 I fix.” +1 (Ix <—[ o|x <— Figure 15. The pulse build—up for w,<<1.r@: , eq. (29). OIX 4‘— <1" <— (a; Figure 16. The pulse build-up for a), >> T 9 eq. (39). CON CL USION A pulse traveling in an infinite, homogeneous and isotropic medium, characterized by a complex elastic medium, moves with a maximum velocity (C) . This is the velocity of the Fourier com- ponent of the pulse with the highest frequency. Other components move with lower velocities, each a function of the pertaining fre— quency. Because of the above-stated dispersive property of all media, a pulse arrives distorted at the plane X¢o . Of particular interest to the Observer is the manner in which the pulse builds up to an observable amplitude. Experimental determination of sound velocity in different media is a case where a knowledge of the process of building up of a pulse might prove to be of considerable importance. We have found that a sonic pulse, in a medium having a re- laxation time (T) builds up exponentially at first and later assumes its Oscillatory property. A detector of infinite sensitivity, at a distanceOUfrom the Source of the pulse, registers the arrival of the pulse at f: .25.. As the sensitivity of the detector decreases, the detection of the 44 pulse arrival is delayed. This is one of many effects that make the experimental determination of sound velocity subject to controversies. Such a determination leads to values dependent on the following prop- erties: l. the dispersive properties of the medium, 2. the Fourier composition of the pulse, 3. the sensitivity of the detecting device. Further treatment is needed to discuss the behavior of a pulse for the case Paw/awhich is not cOvered by the approximate methods developed in this thesis. However, it appears that, for most of the values of (a) met in practice, the error introduced, in the velocity determination, by the presenceof the precursor will not be too large. Finally, it must be pointed out that the general methods de— veloped here may be applied to the propagation of an electromagnetic pulse in a medium in which the dispersion arises from a relaxation process. In this case, however, the values of (a) will not,in gen- eral,be small and the effects of the precursor may be much larger than in the sonic case. BIBLIOG RAPHY Kronig, R. deL. Physica. 12, 543 (1946). Shiitzer, W., and J. Tiomno. Phys. Rev. 83, 249 (1951). Wigner, E. P., and L. Eisenbud. Phys. Rev. 72, 29 (1947). Van Kampen, N. G. Phys. Rev. 89, 1072 (1953) and Phys. Rev. 91, 1267 (1953). Hiedemann, E., and R. D. Spence. Z. Physik. 133, 109 (1952). Kramers, H. A. Atti. cong. intern. fisici, Como, 1927, Vol. 2, p. 545. Kronig, R. DeL. J. Opt. Soc. Am. 12, 547 (1926). Sommerfeld, A. Ann.-Physik. 44, 177 (1914). Brillouin, L. Ann. Physik. 44, 203 (1914). . . . ~ . . .. a. . . L .. . a . . . H .. . J . I. an? .i. twin-Elf MICHIan STnTE UNIV. LIBRARIES 1|)WIHlllll1|WWI“1W1|11111111111111”) 31293017430228