DEVELOPMENTAL CHANGES IN ASSIMILATIQN AND musmcmon '0? PHOTOSYNTHATE m '- _- g i g’ * : : [ff BLACK WAlNUT (‘J‘UGLANS mam Li)._AND. ‘ . f _ f . _ : 5 1 HONEvmcuST (‘GLEDITSSAWRIACANTHOS L )2 ~ ' SEEDLINGS - Thesis for the Degree. offinD. MlCHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY STANLEY BARTON CARPENTER 1971 “rs-.3 This is to certify that the thesis entitled Developmental changes in assimilation and translocation of Photosynthate in black walnut (Juglans Nigra L.) and honeylocust (Gleditsia Triacanthos L.) seedlings presented by Stanley Barton Carpenter has been accepted towards fulfillment of the requirements for Ph.D. Forestry degree in James W. Hanover L- ‘ ILUIIIVCISity‘ -7 " “Jr.” ,‘I .—~.. r Y J Major professor Date March 24 1971 0-7639 a- . “ml ABSTRACT DEVELOPMENTAL CHANGES IN ASSIMILATION AND TRANSLOCATION OF PHOTOSYNTHATE IN BLACK WALNUT (JUGLANS NIGRA L.) AND HONEYLOCUST (GLEDITSIA TRIACANTHOS L.) SEEDLINGS BY Stanley Barton Carpenter Growth patterns, rates of photosynthesis and respiration, and the incorporation of photoassimilated 14CO2 into major fractions of the leaves, stem, and roots were studied in black walnut and honeylocust seedlings during the first growing season. Black walnut is typical of those deciduous trees with the preformed shoot growth habit whereas honeylocust has the sympodial growth habit. Other differences between the two species include seed size, leaf dimorphism, and nastic leaf movement. Analyses of cumulative height growth, leaf area accretion, and dry matter production showed height growth in black walnut was of short duration and was completed early in the growing season. In contrast, honeylocust seedlings grew continuously in height through the summer to September 1. Similar trends were observed in leaf area accretion and dry matter production. However, root growth in both species occurred to September 21. Stanley Barton Carpenter Rates of photosynthesis and reSpiration were deter- mined in the laboratory with an infrared-gas analyzer in a closed system. Honeylocust seedlings exhibited a remark- able superiority over black walnut in rates of net photo- synthesis computed on a leaf area basis. Net photosynthesis ranged as high as 14 mg CO2 dm-2 hr_1 for black walnut and as high as 20 mg CO2 dm—2 hr-l for honeylocust. However, when net or total photosynthesis was calculated on a whole seedling basis, black walnut because of its larger leaf area showed much higher rates of CO2 uptake. Net photosyn- thesis increased gradually in honeylocust seedlings and reached a peak incorporation of 15.5 mg CO2 dm-2 hr.l on August 10 and remained at a high level through September 21 as leaf abscission began. Net photosynthesis in black walnut reached a peak level of incorporation of 7.8 mg CO2 dm-2 hr-1 on July 27 and then declined sharply to a low level of 1.3 mg CO2 dm-2 hr-1 on September 7. There was considerable variation in rates of net photosynthesis, dark respiration, and photorespiration among individual trees of both species. Rates of CO2 evolution for dark respiration were as high as 10 mg CO2 dm-2 hr-l for black walnut and 13 mg CO2 dm”2 hr-l for honeylocust. Photo- respiration rates ranged as high as 9 mg CO2 dm_2 hr-1 in 2 black walnut and 22 mg CO dm- hr.l for honeylocust. 2 Distinct differences were observed in the pattern 14 O O O I O I I of C incorporation into amino ac1d, organic ac1d, sugar, non-water soluble, and ethanol-insoluble fractions extracted Stanley Barton Carpenter from the leaves, stem, and roots. In black walnut seed- lings there was a gradual shifting of metabolic activity from the leaves to the stem and finally to the roots as the growing season progressed. In contrast the pattern of metabolism and translocation in honeylocust seedlings remained static. The leaves of walnut seedlings labeled early in the growth cycle showed reduced levels of radio- activity as leaf abscission began in the fall indicating redistribution of metabolites when leaf abscission occurs. 14 In contrast high levels of C remained in honeylocust leaves on September 21 as leaf abscission began. The study of the incorporation of 14CO2 into specific sugars of black walnut showed distinct differences when a period of maximum photosynthetic activity was compared with a period of low photosynthetic activity. Sucrose accounted for 66 per cent of the total radioactivity recovered on June 15. Smaller amounts of radioactivity were found in glucose, fructose, raffinose, and stachyose. On September 7 the sucrose fraction contained only 44 per cent of the total 14C recovered from walnut seedlings. Increased amounts of radioactivity were found in glucose, fructose, raffinose, and stachyose. DEVELOPMENTAL CHANGES IN ASSIMILATION AND TRANSLOCATION OF PHOTOSYNTHATE IN BLACK WALNUT (JUGLANS NIGRA L.) AND HONEYLOCUST (GLEDITSIA TRIACANTHOS L.) SEEDLINGS BY Stanley Barton Carpenter A THESIS Submitted to Michigan State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Department of Forestry 1971 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I wish to express my sincere appreciation to Dr. James W. Hanover (Chairman) whose generous encourage- ment, suggestions, and assistance made this study possible. Other members of my guidance committee--Drs. D. P. Penner, G. Schneider, J. A. D. Zeevaart, and F. W. Snyder--also made valuable contributions. I am further grateful to Mr. R. Comstock whose assistance in the laboratory helped bring this study to its conclusion. Finally, I wish to thank my wife, Jane, for her encouragement and typing assistance. The study was completed while the author was on a National Defense Education Act Fellowship. Additional financial support was provided by the McIntire-Stennis Cooperative Forestry Research Program. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGMENTS . . . . . . . . . . . LIST OF LIST OF TABLES O O O O O O O O O O O FIGURES O O I O O O O O C O 0 INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . Chapter I. II. III. HEIGHT GROWTH, LEAF AREA ACCRETION, AND WEIGHT PRODUCTION . . . . . . . Introduction . . . . . . . Materials and Methods . . . . . Results and Discussion . . . . . Height Growth . . . . . . . Leaf Area Accretion . . . . . Dry Weight Production . . . . Comparison of Species . . . . PHOTOSYNTHESIS AND RESPIRATION . . . Introduction . . . . . . . Materials and Methods . . . . . Results and Discussion . . . . Photosynthetic Efficiency . . . Effect of Light Intensity . . . Photorespiration . . . . . . C02 Compensation Point . . . . TRANSLOCATION OF LABELED PHOTOSYNTHATE Introduction . . . . . . Materials and Methods . . . . . iii Page ii vii 15 15 l6 19 19 27 31 34 37 37 38 Chapter Results and Discussion . . . . . . Short Term Translocation of 14C in Black Walnut . . . . Short Term Translocation of 14C in Honeylocust . . . . . . . Redistribution of 14C in Black Walnut Redistribution of 14C in Honeylocust The Incorporation of 14C into the Sugars of Black Walnut . . . . IV. SUMMARY, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS LIST OF REFERENCES . . . . . . . . . . . APPENDIX 0 O O O O O O O O O O O C 0 iv Page 41 41 46 50 51 51 55 6O 65 Table 1. LIST OF TABLES Seasonal changes in cumulative height, leaf area, and dry weight of black walnut and honeylocust seedlings . . . . Analysis of variance of net photosynthesis of black walnut seedlings at four dates and three light intensities . . . . . Analysis of variance of net photosynthesis of honeylocust seedlings at four dates and three light intensities . . . . . Seasonal changes in total photosynthesis of developing black walnut and honeylocust seedlings at 10,000 ft-c . . . . . . Effect of developmental stages on net photosynthesis at different light intensities in black walnut and honeylocust seedlings . . . . . . . Effect of developmental stages on photo- respiration at different light intensities in young black walnut and honeylocust seedlings . . . . . . . . . . . Developmental changes in the C02 compensation point in young black walnut and honeylocust seedlings at 25°C . . . . . . . . . Redistribution of 14C between the leaves, stems, and roots of black walnut and honeylocust seedlings . . . . . . . Changes in the distribution of 14C among the sugars of leaves, stem, and roots of black walnut seedlings on two dates during the first growing season . . . . . . Page 22 26 28 29 33 36 44 53 Table Page 10. Variation in net photosynthesis between individual seedlings of black walnut and honeylocust on four dates during the first growing season . . . . . . . 65 11. Variation in dark respiration between individual seedlings of black walnut and honeylocust on four dates in the first growing season . . . . . . . . . 56 12. Variation in photorespiration between individual seedlings of black walnut and honeylocust at four dates during the first growing season . . . . . . . 67 13. Variation in the CO compensation point between individuaI seedlings of black walnut and honeylocust seedlings on four dates during the first growing season . . . . . . . . . . . . . 68 14. Seasonal effect on incorporation of 14C into major fractions extracted from leaves, stem, and roots of black walnut seedlings after one day and at the end of the first growing season. Three seedlings were labeled on each of four dates during the growing season . . . . . 69 15. Seasonal effect on incorporation of 14C into major fractions extracted from leaves, stem, and roots of honeylocust seedlings after one day and at the end of the first growing season. Three seedlings were labeled on each of four dates during the growing season . . . . . 70 vi Figure 1. LIST OF FIGURES Page Developmental changes in net photosynthesis, photorespiration and dark respiration in black walnut seedlings . . . . . . . . 20 Developmental changes in net photosynthesis, photorespiration and dark respiration in honeylocust seedlings . . . . . . . . 23 Extraction procedure . . . . . . . . . 40 Seasonal effect on incorporation of 14C into major fractions extracted from leaves, stem, and roots of black walnut seedlings one day after treatment . . . . . . . . . . 42 Seasonal effect on incorporation of 14C into major fractions extracted from leaves, stem, and roots of honeylocust one day after treatment . . . . . . . . . . . . 47 vii INTRODUCTION Deciduous hardwood species dominate the eastern half of the United States yet surprisingly little is known of their growth and metabolism. Important physiological processes in most valuable hardwood species are virtually unstudied. More research has probably gone into the elimination of hardwoods and their subsequent replacement with conifers than towards increasing our knowledge of their basic physiology. Despite their large size, forest trees character- istically exhibit low rates of photosynthesis when compared with crop plants (Jarvis and Jarvis, 1964; Larcher, 1969). Comparative photosynthetic rates of deciduous and coni- ferous trees have seldom been measured under similar con- ditions. Deciduous trees would appear to be at a distinct disadvantage in terms of growth because of their deciduous habit. Photosynthesis in deciduous hardwoods is of course limited to the time that the leaves are present and per- haps only a portion of this period. Maximum rates of photosynthesis are achieved only after the leaves reach full size (Shiroya, gt_al., 1961). Leaf abscission is preceded by a period of gradually increasing senescence of the leaves during which photosynthesis has been shown to be greatly reduced (Rhoads and Wedding, 1953). On the other hand photosynthesis in coniferous species occurs throughout the year during favorable conditions. Photo- synthesis has been observed by Freeland (1945) in Pinus sylvestris L., Picea mariana (Mill.) B.S.P., and Pinus nigra Arnold during the winter when temperatures ranged as low as -6°C. Others have also detected photosynthesis and reSpiration at temperatures below freezing (Brown, 1970; Parker, 1953). Available data indicate that deciduous hardwoods are not disadvantaged by the limitations of a leafless period. They may grow and photosynthesize at greater rates than conifers allowing for greater dry matter accu- mulation over the period of a year. Verduin (1953) pro- jected photosynthetic rates of Picea pungens Engelm. to be only one-seventh the rates reported for apple. Jarvis and Jarvis (1964) observed that maximum rates of net photosynthesis for temperate zone conifers were in the range of 5 to 10 mg CO2 dm-2 hr 1 compared to rates of 10 to 20 mg CO2 dm-2 hr.1 for broad-leaved trees and shrubs. Kramer (1953) reported (work of Polster in Ger- many) that the average rate of photosynthesis of evergreen conifers for an entire season is considerably lower than that of broad-leaved species, and the rate of deciduous larch is intermediate. Kramer and Decker (1944) in comparative studies of hardwoods and pines attributed the lower rates of photosyn- thesis of the pines to mutual shading of the needles. Krueger and Ferrell (1965) found maximum rates of net photosynthesis in young Douglas-fir seedlings to be as . high as 18 mg co2 dm‘2 hr-l. Brix (1967) also reported i” similar high rates for this species. Many studies have shown that broadleaf species attain maximum photosynthesis ,- at lower light intensities than conifers. It is clear that more studies on the factors limit- ing growth and photosynthesis in woody plants are needed. Since most available information indicates that deciduous trees are photosynthetically more efficient than conifers, their study seems a logical first step. Ledig (1969) has developed a mathematical model for relating growth and photosynthesis in tree seedlings. He includes rates of net photosynthesis, distribution of assimilate between the leaves and other organs, and seasonal aspects of photo- synthesis. This type of approach appears to have consider- able merit for evaluating the photosynthetic efficiency of a Species. Several workers have followed the seasonal course of photosynthesis, respiration, and metabolism in coni- fers (Gordon and Larson, 1968; Neish, 1958; Nelson, 1964; Schier, 1970; and Shiroya, gt $1., 1966). Few studies of this type have been undertaken with deciduous forest tree species. The study reported here was done to learn more about the seasonal and developmental patterns of photosyn- l4 thesis, respiration, and metabolism of labeled CO2 in deciduous broad-leaved trees. The experimental plants were first-year potted seedlings of black walnut (Juglans nigra L.) and honeylocust (Gleditsia triancanthos L.) grown outdoors near East Lansing, Michigan. The following growth characteristics were studied at four dates from June to September, 1970: total height growth, leaf area accretion, and dry matter production of leaves, roots, and stem. The purpose of these measurements was to serve as an aid in the interpretation of measurements of photosyn- l4C labeled thesis, respiration, and translocation of photosynthate. Photosynthesis, dark respiration, and photorespira- tion also were measured at four dates from June to Sept- ember, 1970 in order to study the seasonal development and efficiency of the photosynthetic processes. Finally, the fate of labeled 14CO2 was determined at four dates from June to September, 1970 in leaves, stem,and roots 24 hours after exposure and again at the time of leaf abscission to determine seasonal trends in metabolism of the two species. CHAPTER I HEIGHT GROWTH, LEAF AREA ACCRETION, AND DRY WEIGHT PRODUCTION Introduction A thorough understanding of growth and development patterns of a species is basic to the study of other physio- logical processes in that species. The course of seasonal height growth has been defined for several deciduous species (Kienholz, 1941; Kozlowski and Ward, 1957). Such studies have contributed to our understanding of the sym- podial and preformed shoot growth habits of deciduous trees and shrubs. These studies also suggest possible transloca- tion patterns and priority of stored foods metabolism. Other studies of seasonal cambial activity have also revealed general patterns for lateral growth of woody plants (Fritts, 1958; Reimer, 1949). Fayle (1968) has reviewed much of the literature on root growth. Growth in one part of a tree is influenced by the growth in other parts. Such correlative growth responses are thought to reflect competition for food, water, minerals and hormones. An example is the ability of reproductive structures to mobilize metabolic products often at the expense of vegetative organs. Little is known about the specific interactions of growth between the various organs of woody plants. Bey and Phares (1968) determined the seasonal growth patterns of the shoot and roots for five seed sources of one-year old black walnut and reported cumulative dry matter production of the roots of only about 10 grams. These low values coupled with an abrupt rather than sigmoid cumulative height growth curve seem to indicate that the seedlings in their study were grown under conditions of moisture stress. ' The first objective of my study was to define normal seasonal development of first-year, potted black walnut and honeylocust seedlings grown outdoors under ' optimal conditions of moisture and mineral nutrition. Data are presented for cumulative height growth, leaf area accretion, and dry matter production of leaves, stem, and roots. Materials and Methods First-year black walnut (Juglans nig£a_L.) and honeylocust (Gleditsia triacanthos L.) seedlings were used as experimental material. Black walnuts were collected from several individual trees in the vicinity of Michigan State University in September and October, 1969. They were immediately husked, sown in buried 11% liter pots and left outdoors to overwinter at the M.S.U. Tree Research Center. Honeylocust seeds were collected from a single tree on the Michigan State University Campus in April, 1970 and sown in 4-liter pots on May 23, 1970 following treatment with concentrated sulfuric acid for 40 minutes. Germination of the black walnuts began on May 18, 1970 and continued sporadically through June 1970 until about 57 per cent of the seeds had germinated. Honey- locust began to germinate on June 10 and 99 per cent had germinated within a period of one week. Pots containing germinated seeds were buried at a spacing of 61 x 61 cm behind a wind barrier at the Tree Research Center where they remained during the 1970 grow- ing season. Each seedling was irrigated daily to maintain the soil in the pots at or near field capacity. At three- week intervals each pot was heavily fertilized with an aqueous solution containing major and minor nutrients. Frequent weeding kept the seedlings free of competition. The foliage of the walnut seedlings was sprayed several times with a 0.5 per cent aqueous solution of zineb to mini- mize damage from the walnut anthracnose [Gnomonia leptostyla (Fru.) Ces. and DeN.]. Temperature and solar radiation dur- ing the study period were not unusual for southern Michigan. One month after germination 12 trees were selected from each species for height, leaf area, and dry weight determinations. Sample trees were selected on the basis of uniformity of height, appearance of the foliage, and germination date. An additional 24 sample trees were selected on the same basis and were set aside for the photosynthesis and translocation portions of this study. At four dates, approximately one month apart, three trees were selected at random from within the 12 sample trees and taken into the laboratory for analysis. Measurement dates for black walnut were June 15, July 27, August 17, and September 7 and for honeylocust July 13, August 10, September 1, and September 21. Total height measurements were recorded to the nearest 0.1 cm. Leaf areas were planimetered to the nearest 0.5 cm2 and totaled for the whole seedling. Dry weights of leaves, stem, roots, and whole plant were determined by weighing to nearest 0.001 9 after drying in an oven at 60°C for 24 hours. Results and Discussion Table 1 shows the seasonal changes in cumulative height, leaf area, and dry weight for each species during the 1970 growing season. Black walnut is typical of those deciduous Species with the preformed shoot growth habit. Honeylocust shows a growth pattern characteristic of deciduous species with the sympodial growth habit where persistent terminal buds are not formed and the shoot tip dies and abscises. w . momma m mo cmmzH m.~ H.H v.H o.o capes Doonm\uoom m.HH «.5 m.m ~.H panda mace; o.m m.m a.m v.0 muoom m.~ m.a H.H m.o Emum m.H m.H H.H m.o mo>mmq “Am; unmade» .55 m.mm m.mm ~.v~ m.ma AmEoV some wood c.5m h.mm >.mm >.- “Evy on m>wumasesu Hm uwnEmummm H umbfimummm 0H umsmsm ma mash uwsoonocom «.0 >.m o.~ w.H owumu Doonm\ooom m.nv H.mm «.mm o.m uswam maosz n.ov ~.bm o.~m m.m muoom o.m v.m m.m m.o Scum o.m H.v w.» o.a mm>mmq "Ame panama mun m.~m v.vm v.ema m.~m ANEOV mono mama h.mm m.mm m.m~ Hm.ma “SUV an m>wumflsesu n umbfioummm 5H umomsé um mash ma econ panama xomam .mmcwaomom unsooamocon one unsamz goods «0 unmwoz map can .mmum mama .usmwon o>flumassso cw momsmgo Hm:0mmomun.a mqmda 10 Height Growth Black walnut completed about 80 per cent of its height growth before June 15. Growth then slowed between June 15 and July 27. By July 27 height growth had ceased. Five black walnut sources grown at Ames, Iowa terminated height growth in early July (Bey and Phares, 1968). I L" Honeylocust seedlings showed a pattern of height growth characteristic of the sympodial growth habit. Only 60 per cent of its height growth had been attained by July 13. Growth continued at a reduced rate between July 13 and August 10 but was essentially complete by August 10. A small but significant amount of height growth continued through September 21. Leaf Area Accretion Leaf area increased very rapidly in the developing black walnut seedlings. It reached a level of 52.6 cm2 by June 15 (Table 1). Between June 15 and July 27 the leaf surface area doubled and reached a peak of 124.4 cmz. Between July 27 and August 17 leaf area decreased as older leaves of the lower crown began to senesce and abscise. Leaf abscission accelerated after August 17 and by Sept- ember 27 only 52.5 cm2 of leaf area remained. Honeylocust seedlings showed a different pattern of leaf area accretion. Rapid leaf area buildup occurred during the first two months after germination. After August 10 leaf area accretion ceased for a short period. 11 Between September 1 and 21 a second increase in leaf area occurred and a maximum for the season of 35.8 cm2 was reached. Leaves of lower crown began to abscise shortly before September 21. Dgy Weight Production Trends in dry weight of the leaves were similar to those for leaf area accretion (Table 1). However, leaf dry weight decreased after September 1 while leaf area continued to increase. It is possible that development and enlargement of new leaves masked the abscission of some leaves in the lower crown. Stem growth of black walnut occurred only in the first two months after germination. The most rapid increase occurred between June 15 and July 27. After July 27 stem growth ceased. Stem growth of honeylocust seedlings was greatest in early summer and fall. The most rapid rise occurred between July 13 and August 10. After September 1 a second peak period of stem growth increase was recorded. Both species showed two periods of root growth separated by a period of relative inactivity (Table 1). In walnut seedlings the first peak of activity occurred between June 15 and July 27. Between July 27 and August 17 little root growth occurred. A second period of root growth occurred between August 17 and September 7. Most of the root growth in developing honeylocust seedlings 12 occurred between July 13 and August 10. As in walnut this was followed by a period of little growth. Between Sept- ember l and September 27 a second period of root growth occurred. Total plant dry matter reflected the activity of the root fractions (Table 1). Both species showed a steep rise in total dry matter followed by a period of inacti- vity. This in turn was followed by a second period of growth in the fall. Comparison of Species Developing black walnut and honeylocust seedlings showed height growth patterns characteristic of the pre- formed shoot and sympodial growth habits respectively. The height growth of black walnut occurred over a rela- tively short time period in comparison with honeylocust. The latter showed slight but continued height growth in the fall. Both Species have a compound leaf structure. Black walnut leaves are of the odd-pinnate type and honey- locust leaves are of the 2-pinnate decompound type. The pattern of leaf area accretion and the total leaf area prOduced in a single season were remarkably different between the two Species. Walnut seedlings reached a maxi- mum leaf area of 124.4 cm2 within two months after germi- nation and then leaf area declined. Walnut characteris- tically looses its leaves early in comparison to other deciduous Species (Kramer, 1943). Most leaf area expansion 13 in honeylocust seedlings occurred within two months of germination. This was followed by a long period of little increase. A second period of leaf area buildup occurred in the fall. Perhaps the most remarkable difference between the two Species was the tremendous difference in total leaf area produced. At its peak, relatively early in the growing season, the average black walnut seedling had a total leaf area of 124.4 cmz. The maximum leaf area for honeylocust seedlings was 35.8 cm2 and this was not obtained until September 21. Much of the variation in early growth patterns and total dry matter between the two Species may be due to the large difference in seed size. Black walnut is among the largest seeds of the plant kingdom, 40 seeds per pound while honeylocust seeds are considerably smaller, 2,800 seeds per pound (U. S. Forest Service, 1948). Data on leaf dry matter generally followed the trends of leaf area accretion. Dry matter data for the stem and roots were further indicative of the preformed shoot and sympodial growth habits. Walnut stem growth ceased sometime prior to July 27 while honeylocust stem growth continued throughout the study period. Growth of the roots was maximal in early summer and fall. The results here agree partly with those of Lyr and Hoffmann (1967) who reported that maximum growth of roots of deciduous trees occurred in early summer compared with l4 coniferous species which grow more uniformly through the whole vegetative period. P}. CHAPTER II PHOTOSYNTHESIS AND RESPIRATION Introduction Studies of photosynthesis of forest trees have dealt largely with Single measures of photosynthesis under certain "standard” conditions. Other studies have been aimed at determining the effects of specific environ- mental factors on the photosynthetic process. Much of this work has been summarized by Larcher (1969) and Kramer (1958). Considerable effort has gone into the study of specific environmental factors which facilitate the opti- mum rate of photosynthesis in the species studied. Less attention has been given to the measurement of photosyn- thesis during developmental states within the annual cycles of growth and ontogeny of the species. Often age in years and plant size have been the only factors considered. It is usually not apparent to the reader just where within the annual cycle of growth and development the measurements were made. Several studies have been made on seasonal fluctua- tions of photosynthesis in evergreen trees (Bourdeau, 1959; 15 16 Helms, 1965; McGregor and Kramer, 1963). Fewer studies have been made in deciduous trees (Heinicke and Childers, 1937; Saeki and Nomoto, 1958). Most of these studies were conducted outdoors and seasonal fluctuations in environmental factors obscure or complicate the study of photosynthetic efficiency. In the work reported here photosynthetic efficiency for developing black walnut and honeylocust seedlings grown outdoors in southern Michigan was measured at intervals during the first growing season. Materials and Methods First-year black walnut and honeylocust seedlings grown outdoors under optimum conditions of soil moisture and mineral nutrition were used. See Chapter I for details of the experimental material. On four dates, approximately one month apart from June to September 1970, different groups of five seedlings of each Species were brought into the laboratory for determinations of photosynthesis and respiration rates under standard conditions of light intensity and tempera- ture. Relative humidity was monitored but not controlled. Due to the mechanics of the translocation portion of the study, it was not possible to follow photosynthesis and respiration within the same group of five seedlings throughout the growing season. The sampling dates for walnut were June 15, July 27, August 17, and September 7. Honeylocust seedlings were sampled on July 13, August 10, 17 September 1, and September 21. The last date for each species coincided with the start of leaf abscission. Photosynthesis and respiration measurements were made in a closed system using a controlled environment chamber constructed of acrylic plastic. The chamber was about 50 liters in volume and was surrounded by a water jacket for temperature stabilization. Four SOC-watt weather resistant flood lamps were immersed in an acrylic plastic water bath above the chamber. Additional tempera- ture and light control was achieved by placing the chamber into a large Sherer-Gillett controlled environment room. Light intensity was controlled with a Powerstat Type 3PN1368 variable transformer. Temperature was stabilized at 25°C :4 by varying the water levels in the water bath and chamber water jacket and manipulation of the tempera- ture control of the controlled environment room. Rela- tive humidity varied between 45 and 65 per cent. A Beckman infrared gas analyzer model 215 and a Sevoriter recorder were used to detect and record CO2 con- centration changes. Small Rotron fans circulated air in the chamber and a Masterflex tubing pump maintained a flow rate of 900 ml/min. in the closed system. A "Drierite" (Ca 804) dessicant column was used to remove water vapor from the air stream flowing into the gas analyzer. Slight CO absorption by the Ca SO4 drying column did not signi- 2 ficantly affect the results. 18 Individual seedlings including their pot container were placed into the acrylic chamber and equilibrated at 25°C and 10,000 ft-c of light intensity. Polyethylene bags were sealed around the pots to eliminate the effects of soil respiration and evaporation from the soil surface. After a lS-minute conditioning period the CO2 concentra- tion in the measurement chamber was raised to a level slightly in excess of 400 ppm, the chamber was sealed, and the CO2 uptake was recorded until the chamber CO2 con- centration had decreased to around 200 ppm. The chamber was then opened to ambient air and the light intensity was lowered to 7,000 ft-c for honeylocust and 3,000 ft-c for black walnut. After a 15-minute conditioning period at the new light intensity the chamber was sealed and photo- synthesis was again recorded from 400 ppm to 200 ppm. Upon reaching a C02 concentration of 200 ppm, the system was again opened to the ambient air and the light inten- sity was lowered a second time to 4,000 ft-c for honey- locust and 1,800 ft-c for black walnut. After a lS-minute conditioning period at the new light intensity the CO2 uptake was recorded from 400 ppm to the CO compensation 2 point. Upon reaching the CO compensation point the 2 lights were turned off and dark respiration was recorded for two hours following the light period. The rate of CO depletion from 330 to 270 ppm was 2 used as the measure of net photosynthesis. Rates were 19 computed from slopes of lines drawn tangent to the recorder tracings. Results and Discussion Photosynthetic Efficiency Net photosynthesis in developing black walnut seed- lings reached a peak incorporation of 7.8 mg CO2 dm-2 hr-l on July 27, the second measurement date (Figure 1). By August 17 net photosynthesis had declined to 7.1 mg CO 2 dm”2 hr-l. After August 17 net photosynthesis decreased Sharply to a low level of 1.3 mg C02 qu2 hr-l as rapid abscission began. A factorial analysis of net photosynthesis at the different measurement dates and light intensities revealed dates to be highly Significant (Table 2). Dark respiration followed an irregular pattern during the period of study (Figure l). The highest rates of dark respiration were found during the period of rapid leaf expansion and when leaf abscission began. The high rate on September 7 may reflect the dying of the leaves as they began to abscise. Net photosynthesis in developing honeylocust seed- lings showed a much different pattern (Figure 2). Net photosynthesis on July 13 was 10.6 mg CO2 dm-2 hr-l. By 2 -1 August 10 it had increased to 15.5 mg CO dm- hr and 2 remained near this level through September 1. After September 1 net photosynthesis began to decline and by September 21 it was 12.2 mg CO2 dm-2 hr-l. The relatively 20 Figure l.--Developmental changes in net photosynthesis, photorespiration and dark respiration in black walnut seedlings. 21 \ a \ N .3 .Ju amp 300 6w noun-ma 30:) I I ¢ U NN >15... 0. >153 20_._.m0._.01n_ .52 “U F3244; x0<4m _l.. 300 1 .2 p 30:) 6w :7 ' so I-‘“ z-w 3 )IVidn 22 TABLE 2.--Analysis of variance of net photosynthesis of black walnut seedlings at four dates1 and three light intensities.2 Source of Variance Percent of Total Variance Date 37** Light intensity 8** Date x light intensity 1 Error 4 1June 15, July 27, August 17, and September 7 2 1,800; 3,000; and 10,000 ft-c **Significant at the 1% level 23 Figure 2.--Developmenta1 changes in net photosynthesis, photorespiration, and dark respiration in honeylocust seedlings. _ — N (D N m 0 n 1 n 141 C02 UPTAKE mg C02 dm'z hr" A =' “assesses HONEYLOCUST MPHOTORESPIRATION - DARK RESPIRATION Fl co2 EVOLUTION mg C02 am" hr" JULY l3 AUG IO | SEPT 2| & Z 7 4 25 high rate of net photosynthesis on September 21 may be characteristic of the sympodial growth habit. The develOp- ment of new leaves may have kept the rate of net photosyn- thesis at a high level even though leaves of the lower crown had begun to abscise. A factorial analysis of net photosynthesis of the different measurement dates and light intensities Showed date to be highly significant (Table 3). Dark respiration was highest, 9.5 mg CO2 dm-2 hr-l, in honeylocust seedlings on July 13 as rapid leaf expansion occurred (Figure 2). On August 10 it declined to approximately 8 mg CO2 dm“2 hr.1 and remained near this level through September 1. In sharp contrast to black walnut dark respiration in honeylocust was lowest as leaf abscission began. There was considerable variation in rates of net photosynthesis and dark respiration among individual trees of both species. Net photosynthesis ranged as high as 14 mg CO2 dm"2 hr.l for black walnut and as high as 20 mg CO2 dru-2 hr.l for honeylocust (see Appendix, Table 10). Rates of CO2 evolution for dark respiration were as high as 10 mg CO dm-2 hr"l for black walnut and 13 mg CO 2 dm-2 hr—l for honeylocust (see Appendix, Table 11). 2 Both black walnut and honeylocust are considered shade intolerant and reproduction is limited to openings in the forest canopy (Baker, 1949). The low rate of net photosynthesis of black walnut in comparison with honey- locust was unexpected. The growth of walnut seedlings is 26 TABLE 3.--Analysis of variance of net photosynthesis of honeylocust seedlings at four dates1 and three light intensities.2 Source of Variance Percent of Total Variance Date 65** Light intensity 25** Date x light intensity 1 Error 9 1July 13, August 10, September 1, and September 21 2 4,000; 7,000; and 10,000 ft-c **Significant at 1% level 27 remarkably rapid considering its early leaf abscission in comparison with other hardwoods. There is no available information on the early growth rates of honeylocust seed- lings. To further investigate the differences between the two species, rates of total photosynthesis were determined on a leaf area and whole plant basis (Table 4). On a leaf area basis honeylocust seedlings exhibited a remarkable superiority in carbon dioxide uptake over walnut. However, when total photosynthesis was expressed on a whole plant basis the Situation was reversed. Black walnut presumably because of its greater leaf surface area surpassed honey- locust in total CO uptake. It is possible other leaf 2 factors also may be involved. It seems reasonable that differences in the number, distribution, and size of stomata as well as the thickness of the leaf and its mesophyll may further contribute to differences in photosynthesis between the two species. In walnut stomates are restricted to the upper epidermis and average 46,000 per cm2 (Meyer and Anderson, 1952). Observations by the author indicate that the stomates of honeylocust also are restricted to the upper epidermis. Data on stomatal size and relative dis- tribution are not available for either species. Effect of Light Intensity The limited objectives of this study did not permit a detailed examination of the effects of light intensity on the photosynthetic apparatus. Table 5 shows the effects of 28 TABLE 4.--Seasonal changes in total photosynthesisl of developing black walnut and honeylocust seed- lings at 10,000 ft-c. Total Photosynthesis Species and Dates mg CO2 dm_2 hr.l mg CO2 Seedling"1 hr.-1 Black Walnut June 15 10.42 53.8 July 27 12.8 164.5 August 17 12.7 108.0 September 7 8.4 34.1 Honeylocust July 13 20.0 25.6 August 10 23.0 55.6 September 1 23.9 60.2 September 21 19.3 65.4 1Total photosynthesis = net photosynthesis + dark respiration 2Mean of 5 trees 29 TABLE 5.--Developmental changes in net photosynthesis at different light intensities in black walnut and honeylocust seedlings. Species and Net Photosynthesis2 l' Date Black Walnut 1,800 ft-c 3,000 ft-c 10,000 ft-c j mg CO2 dm-2 hr.l L June 15 4.4 a 5.0 a b 4.0 a b July 27 5.9 a 8.8 a 7.8 a August 17 5.0.a 6.8.a 7.1 a September 7 1.4 a 1.6 b 1.3 b Honeylocust 4,000 ft-c 7,000 ft-c 10,000 ft-c mg €02 am"2 hr'l July 13 10.9 a 12.4 a 10.6 a August 10 14.3 a 16.6 a 15.5 a September 1 14.1 a 16.8 a 15.8 a September 21 10.3 a 13.4 a 12.2 a 1 ent at 5 per cent level (Tukey's weprocedure) 2Mean of 5 trees Means not followed by same letter are significantly differ- 30 three light intensities on net photosynthesis in walnut and honeylocust. Factorial analyses showed highly significant differences in the effects of light intensity (Tables 2 and 3). In both species there was an increase in net photosyn- thesis between the low and intermediate light intensities. The inability of honeylocust to carry on net photosynthesis at light intensities below 4,000 ft-c early in the annual growth cycle, did not permit the study of the same light f,‘ intensities for both species. There was a decline in net photosynthesis at full sunlight, 10,000 ft-c, for both species. Other workers have found similar solarization effects in other deciduous hardwoods (Borman, 1953; Kozlowski, 1949). Solarization in conifers occurs at much higher light intensities (Ronco, 1961). The results of this study permit only some very general statements concerning light saturation for each species. Light saturation for black walnut lies somewhere between 3,000 and 10,000 ft-c. It is probably closer to 3,000 ft-c than 10,000 ft-c because light saturation for other hardwoods with similar growth habits lies in this range. Honeylocust has an unexpectedly high light satura- tion. It lies somewhere between 7,000 and 10,000 ft-c. Early in the growing season no measurable net photosyn- thesis occurred in this species below 4,000 ft-c. Later net photosynthesis was detected at lower light intensities. 31 Photorespiration The question has often been asked, do plants ‘ respire in the light or is "dark" respiration turned off during active photosynthesis? From measurements of the rates of O2 and CO2 exchange in illuminated plants it has been determined that most plants do respire in the light .1 while they are carrying on photosynthesis. This photo- respiration is separate from mitochondrial respiration since it is not sensitive to inhibitors of mitochondrial respiration. PhotoreSpiration consumes reducing power generated by photosynthesis and uses it to reduce molecular oxygen. Photorespiration thus shortcircuits photosynthesis by diverting the normal flow of light-induced reducing It power from the reduction of CO to the reduction of O 2 2' has been estimated that in some plants photorespiration utilizes up to 50 per cent of the reducing power generated by photosynthesis (Lehninger, 1970). Some tropical plants including maize and sugar cane Show no apparent photo- respiration. Photorespiration is difficult to measure since it involves simultaneous CO exchange with photosynthesis. 2 Photorespiration has seldom been measured in forest trees. Townsend (1969) found rates of photorespiration in young western white pine seedlings approaching those of dark reSpiration. In certain crop plants the release of CO2 in photorespiration may be three to five times greater than the rate of release in darkness (Zelitch, 1969). No data _.'~4»..u 32 is available on photorespiration measurement in deciduous hardwoods. Photorespiration in this study was estimated by extrapolating photosynthetic response curves to zero CO2 concentration (Brix, 1968). The accuracy of this technique has been challenged (Bravdo, 1968; Brix, 1968; Zelitch, a. 1966). However, its use seems justified since little photoreSpiration data are available for forest trees and i since all current techniques for estimating photorespira- tion have been questioned. Seasonal trends in photorespiration derived by the extrapolation method are shown in Figures 1 and 2. It is evident that photorespiration does change substantially within the annual growth cycle of plants. Rates of photo- respiration were generally related to photosynthetic acti- vity. High rates of photoresPiration usually accompanied high rates of net photosynthesis. (Rates of photorespira- tion were considerably higher in honeylocust than black walnut. There was considerable variation in rates of photo- respiration among individual trees of both Species. Photo— respiration ranged as high as 9 mg CO2 dm-2 hr-1 in black walnut and 22 mg CO2 dm_2 hr-1 for honeylocust (see Appen- dix, Table 12). The rate of photorespiration has been shown to increase with increasing light intensity. This occurred in black walnut on three dates (Table 6). However, 33 TABLE 6.--Effect of developmental stages on photorespiration at different light intensities in black walnut and honeylocust seedlings. Species and Date Photorespiration Black Walnut 3,000 ft-c 10,000 ft-c mg co2 dm'2 hr-l June 15 6.41 8.4 July 27 7.6 e 9.2 August 17 7.9 7.3 September 7 4.0 7.6 Honeylocust 4,000 ft-c 10,000 ft-c mg CO2 dm-2 hr.-1 July 13 8.8 4.8 August 10 10.1 8.4 September 1 20.1 21.5 September 21 4.7 0.6 1 Mean of 5 trees 34 increasing the light intensity from 4,000 to 10,000 ft-c caused a decrease in the rate of photorespiration in honeylocust on three dates. The reason for this is unknown. There was a measurable decrease in the rate of net photosynthesis at 10,000 ft-c. Perhaps this decrease resulting from solarization would also Show up in decreased photorespiration since photosynthesis and photorespiration ” are biochemically linked or because certain cellular com- ‘. ,a-x. ponents of the photorespiratory process are affected. A similar decrease in photosynthetic activity in black walnut did not result in decreased photorespiration. CO Compensation Point 2 Another means of evaluating the photosynthetic efficiency of plants is the determination and comparison of CO compensation points. The CO compensation point 2 2 may be defined as that concentration of CO2 at which the evolution of CO by reSpiration from illuminated leaves 2 equals photosynthetic CO2 uptake. Low compensation points are thought to be correlated with high photosynthetic efficiency because plants lacking photorespiration have compensation points near 0 ppm C02. Few determinations of the CO2 compensation point have been made for forest trees. Townsend (1969) found extremely high CO2 compensation points in young western white pine seedlings. The CO2 compensation points deter- ‘ mined in this study were similar for the two species 'H 35 (Table 7). The compensation points were generally indica- tive of photosynthetic activity. For both Species the CO2 compensation points were lowest when rates of net photo- synthesis were highest. Later, as photosynthetic activity decreased the compensation points increased. There was considerable variation in CO2 compensa- "'l tion points among individual trees of both species. Com- pensation points ranged as low as 95 ppm for black walnut i and 105 ppm for honeylocust during the period when rates of photosynthesis were highest (see Appendix, Table 13). TABLE 7.--Effect of developmental stages on the CO compensation point in black walnut and 36 honeylocust seedlings at 25°C. 2 Species and Date CO2 Compensation Point PPm Black Walnut June 15 1601 July 27 118 August 17 145 September 7 232 Honeylocust July 13 155 August 10 114 September 1 156 2 September 21 1Mean of 5 trees 2Data not obtained “1 ii 1.3:; CHAPTER III TRANSLOCATION OF LABELED PHOTOSYNTHATE Introduction Many of the great advances in biochemistry during the last decade were made possible by the use of radio- isotopes. A major contribution of the radiotracer tech- nique was the determination of the path of carbon in photosynthesis by Calvin and Benson (1948). Radioactive carbon has been used to study seasonal photosynthate pro- duction and translocation in conifers (Gordon and Larson, 1968; Schier, 1970; Shiroya gt 31., 1966). Fewer studies have followed the rate of 14CO2 in deciduous hardwoods (Hanson, 1964). Roberts (1964) used l4CO2 to study the effect of water stress on the translocation of photosyn- thate in yellow-poplar (Liriodendron tulipifera L.). More recently Larson and Gordon (1969) used 14CO2 to study the translocation of photosynthate from selected leaves of young cottonwood (Populus deltoides Bartr.) trees. Most metabolic studies of deciduous trees have been limited in that they have been of short duration and usually have not attempted to follow the incorporation of 37 38 14C into specific compounds extracted from various plant organs. In this study developing black walnut and honey- locust seedlings grown outdoors were photosynthetically labeled at several dates during the growing season. At two time intervals following labeling the radioactivity in Specific compounds of leaf, stem, and root fractions I! f was determined. Materials and Methods L First-year black walnut and honeylocust seedlings grown outdoors under optimum conditions of soil moisture and mineral nutrition were used as experimental material. See Chapter I for details about the experimental material. On four dates, approximately one month apart from June to September 1970, six seedlings of each species were brought into the laboratory and exposed to 14CO2 under defined conditions of light intensity and tempera- ture. Walnut seedlings were labeled on June 15, July 27, August 17, and September 7. Honeylocust seedlings were labeled on July 13, August 10, September 1, and September 21. Whole seedlings were labeled in the same type of closed system used for the determination of rates of photosynthesis and respiration described in Chapter II. Individual seedlings including the pot container were placed in the acrylic chamber at a temperature of 25°C and a light intensity of 10,000 ft-c. Polyethylene bags were used to seal off the pots. After a lS-minute 39 conditioning period the chamber was sealed off and the plant was exposed to about 500 no of 14CO by reacting 2 Ba14CO with perchloric acid. All plants were exposed to 14 3 CO2 for a period of two hours. On most dates this was sufficient time to reach the CO2 compensation point. Immediately after labeling the plants were returned to >- the outdoors. One day after photoassimilation three of the . labeled plants were separated from the soil by washing and divided into leaves, stem, and roots. The remaining three seedlings were harvested in Similar fashion on September 21. This date will hence be referred to as the end of the grow- ing season as it coincided with the start of rapid leaf abscission. Each plant part was cut into small pieces and separated into five fractions, amino acids, organic acids, sugars, non-water soluble, and ethanol insoluble, by means of extraction procedure shown in Figure 3. Ion exchange columns were of the type used by Romberger (1960). The non-water soluble and ethanol insoluble frac- tions were taken to dryness. Sugar, amino acid, and organic acid fractions were reduced to about 5 ml. To determine radioactivity, each fraction was wet-combusted (Van Slyke gt 31., 1951) and the evolved 14CO was trapped 2 in a solution of ethanolamine and glycol monomethyl ether (1:2 v/v). The scintillation solution was prepared accord- ing to the method of Jaffay and Alvarez (1961). Radio- activity was determined in a Packard Tricarb Liquid 4O Leaves, Stem, or Roots I l Homogenized in 200 m1 hot 80% ethanol Filtered, washed pad with hot 90% ethanol then hot absolute ethanol l I 7 Filtrate Residue l l Concentrated in rotary Extracted with hot vacuum evaporator, ethanol/benzene under 40° C, to 10 ml. (1:2), filtered, washed Slurried residue with with same solvent, Celite, added hot water washed with acetone to form paste, filtered, washed pad with hot water r’ l Non-water soluble Residue fraction Ethanol Insoluble Filtrate Residue ‘ Fraction Concentrated to I near dryness and made to 50 ml with water Ion Exchange J Effluent Anion column Cation column (neutral (AG 3-X4A) (AG 50l-X8) fraction) Sugar Organic acid Amino Acid Fraction Fraction Fraction Figure 3.--Extraction procedure. 41 Scintillation Spectrometer. After quench correction by the internal standard method, radioactivity of all fractions in each plant part was expressed as a percentage of the total DPM in the whole tree at the date of harvest. Quantitive determinations of the various fractions were not made and therefore specific activity could not be calculated. Results and Discussion 14 Short Term Translocation of C in Black Walnut Black walnut seedlings harvested one day after 14 photoassimilation of CO at several growth stages 2 revealed a pattern of metabolism and translocation which may be characteristic of trees with the preformed shoot growth habit. Developing organs and meristematic areas are known to be sinks for photosynthates. See Appendix, Table 14 for a complete listing of the incorporation of 14C into the various compounds studied. Between June 15 and July 27 there was a very large increase in the leaf area of the walnut seedlings. This growth pattern was reflected in the high levels of radio- activity recovered from compounds extracted from the leaves (Figure 4). Approximately 79 per cent of the total activity recovered on June 15 was found in the leaves (Table 8). A high proportion of this activity occurred in the non-water soluble fraction, probably in chlorophyll and other pigments (Figure 4). The other ethanol—soluble com- pounds, sugars and amino acids, were at relatively high 42 Figure 4.--Seasonal effect on incorporation of 14C into major fractions extracted from leaves, stem, and roots of black walnut seedlings one day after treatment. PERCENT OF TOTAL ACTIVITY RECOVERED FROM WHOLE PLANT PERCENT OF TOTAL ACTIVITY PERCENT OF TOTAL ACTIVITY RECOVERED FROM WHOLE PLANT RECOVERED FROM WHOLE PLANT 43 4" \ LEAVES -- BLACK WALNUT 44 - \ I’ X - X 28 \ / \ ‘I \ \ 24- \ / \ . \ / \ 20 4 \ /"‘~ / \ / .X ‘y \ I6j . /. \\ / “\ \ /' n _. \J x’ “X \ '2 ‘ *7. “~.\ ‘I‘ K I” ‘\\‘ \‘U 8: \ \:‘ ...... «d, \\\ 4 A 0' ...... '\‘ I -I \6.\ . x / JUNE I5 1qu 27 AUG. I7 SEPT. 7 '6} STEM I 2 " 4’ ‘, I ‘ " ’ ‘\‘ 8 4 \ 41 1.5. \x . o- 44.4“" ~\. ““~--+ J' ~ ~ ..—-" _ «- JUNE l5 JULY 27 AUG. I7 SEPT. 7 72 q .. ’/ 68 « ' ‘I ROOTS X 28 - ’/ .I /§ 24 ~ , . / —-<> AMINO ACIDS 20. '1 «no ORGANIC ACIDS . / _-_. SUGARS .6 . x -— - NON-WATER SOLUBLE / —---+ ETHANOL INSOLUBLE 44 I] mOOHU M NO Cmmz a m.hm m.nm e.vm H.om o.mm m.oH Hm Monsoomom m.em m.~m m.mv m.mH v.Hv m.mv a umnEoumOm m.mm 0.0m .~.ve m.mH n.om v.om 0H umomsd H.ms m.m~ o.mm 5.0m m.mH m.me ma sass "co omHoomA DmSOOdNocom m.~o n.0a v.o~ o.~a 0.4 o.s~ A nongouoom ~.mn m.m m.mH ~.mm o.m m.mm AH umomsa m.mm ~.~H m.H~ n.mm o.m~ m.mv hm maze m.mm o.oa m.va v.m v.va «.mn ma mean "so omaoomq panama xomam IIIIIIIIIIIIIImufi>fluom Hmuou mo usoo mom IIIII IIIIIIIIIIIII muoom Scum mm>moq muoom Scum mm>mmq common mcfisoum mo one on cosmo>nmm woo woo nouns oopmm>umm moon pom moaoomm .mmcflaooom umoooaamcos one panama xomHn mo muoou ocm .maoum .mo>moa on» comsumn Oea mo coausnfluumwommII.m mqm450 umooo4>ocoz 0.4 0.4 . v.4 4.0 0.0 0.0 0.n 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 v.v cow: «.4 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . v.v 5.0 .0 0.4 0.0 v.0 ~.0 0.0 0.v 0.V4 N.V4 0.0 0.0 5.0 0.0 .v v.0 v.4 «.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.n 0.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 .0 4.4 0.4 0.0 0.04 0.04 v.0 0.4 0.0 0.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 I .m 0.4 0.4 0.4 «.0 v.v 0.0 v.04 0.n 0.0 N.~ n.v 0.0 .4 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII 4Iun NIEo ~00 mEIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII III IIII Uluw 000.04 qu0 000.0 quu 000.4 Uluu 000.04 Oqu 000.0 quw 000.4 quw 000.04 Onuw 000.0 oluw 000.4 Oluw 000.04 OIuw 000.0 quu 000.4 u . an .. 89:3 gm S #59:. 2 33. .2 9:6 sonssz DSS403 x0040 :04uo>uowno .cOmoOm 0c4sonm umn4m Ono mcwuoo mmumo Boom co umSOO4>OcO£ ocm Doc4m3 ROM4n mo m0c44oomm 4m504>4oc4 cmokuon mwmocpcmmooonm Doc :4 coaumanm>II.04 mqmocom 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 com: 4 4 4.0 0.04 0.0 0.0 0.04 0.0 0 v.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.04 0.0 0.44 «.04 v 0.44 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.04 0.0 0.0 4.0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 N 4 N 0 0 0 0.0 4 0.0 0.0 040 4 m IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII 4 mEIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII 4I c NIEo OU plum 000.04 OIuw 000.0 0:00 000.04 UIum 000.0 Ulum 000.04 OIum 000.0 UIom 000.04 OIum 000.0 so Em mm m 0 o 0 m 04 um: s4 RN 0450 04 mass Aonssz 45:4m3 40040 c04uo>ummno .c0mmom 0:43040 umHHM on» 0:4Hoo 00400 4500 so umSUO4>ococ poo DSQ4m3 Roo4o mo mmc44omom 4oso4>4024 cmozooo c04uon4mmouoDon :4 :O4uo4uo>II.m4 mqmaa 68 TABLE 13.--Variation in the CO compensation point between individual seedlings of black walnut and honey- locust seedlings on four dates during the first growing season. Observation Black Walnut Number June 15 July 27 August 17 September 7 --------------------- ppm---------------------- 1. 160 110 1 235 2. 140 1 100 235 3. 130 130 165 1 4. 195 95 170 225 5. 175 135 145 1 Mean 160 118 145 232 Observation Honeylocust Number July 13 August 10 September 1 September 212 --------------------- ppm---------------------- 1, 210 100 180 2. 140 110 l 3. 145 105 160 4. 130 135 140 5. 150 120 145 Mean 155 114 156 1Insufficient Data 2Data not obtained because of low rate of net photosynthesis 69 m.~o F.0H «.mm v.om m.m m.w m.o N.o N.N« v.b m.o ~.~ ~.m 0.0 ¢.v N.H N.o v.0 h umnEwumwm N.Mh m.m m.m~ H.mm o.o v.h N.m m.o o.m c.~ h.o m.o 0.5 H.a m.o h.o N.o ~.o ha uusma< m.oo N.NH m.H~ m.oo v.m m.m 0.0 m.~ v.0H m.~ h.o ~.H N.o N.~ h.o N.~ o.H m.o 5N wash m.mw o.cH m.vH m.mo o.m ~.HH m.m o.~ ~.H 5.0 0.0 m.o m.o v.0 m.o m.o m.m w.o ma 0:56 "so omaobmq .sommom mcfl30uo uo one u< at: o... 9: v.2 m.~ ~.m a 5.0 o; «4 To 2 «5 N; m.» HS 9 To B umnsmuamm Nam 05 92 NS... 0..” ~.2 «.5 N4. “.2 5.0 NS 05 o.m To TS To ~.o H6 Z 3.33. 92 92 5.3 T2 5.2 92 m; To 5.2 To 9m o.~ man in 9... m6 m5 To 2 .33. To «.2 ”.3 TH TB 5: m6 o.~ 53 m.~ 0.0 0.3 N; as 54 So NS fin . 3 2:; “CO UQHGQQA .muso: vm nouu< muoom Ewum mm>moq muoom Ewum m0>cwq muoom Scum mm>qu muoom Ecum mo>qu muoom Emum mm>mmq muoom Emum mw>moq poumm>umx omcfinEou mcofiuumum Had wansaomcH Hocmnum cabsaom umumz:coz mamasm moao< vaccwuo mowot onwE< mucaam nuuoquuxm Hocmcum wHQsHOm uwchIqumuuxm Hocmzum use >um>wuo< ku09 we ucmuuom .commmm mcw3oum mnu moanso mmumo Hsom mo comm co omamnma mHmB mmcwaommm woun9 .COmmmm amazohm umnam may mo cam mnu pm wow amp mco umumm mmswaowmm unsam3 xoman mo mwoou ocm “Emum .mm>me Eonm omuownuxm mcowuomum neme ous“ Ova mo coaumuomuoocw so powwwm anaemmmmnl.va mqmda 70 . . . um u now n.5m m.hN v.vm N.«N n.mH N.m m.N H.v m.mN w.m o m «.0 a o m H H N n o m o v o HN n6 u . . . no 0 do o.vm m.NN m.Nv N.hN m.oH o.Nm m.m o.m o h m.o v H e.H N n v o N N v o N o m o H as u m . mam: m.mN o.om N.vv H.HN h.MN w.mm m.N m.m m N «.0 v o v.0 h H v o a H H o N o v 0 0H u 4 a o o u an“ H.mv n.mN o.MN m.mm m.NH b.0H n v m.0H o h H.N m o m.H H H m o m N h o m m m H NH H ":0 omean .COmowm mcHzouo mo ocm ud . . . . go 0 m0 H.oo o.mN m.cH H.Nm v.wN o.m m.H 0.0 h m m.m m H w.o o N m o m H N o v o H o HN DE u m . . . . u Em do h.NH v.Hv m.mv v.5 0.6 m.NH m H H.n N HN o.N N wN m m e o o o m H m o m o o o H mm a m . . m m.mH b.0N v.00 m.o o.b v.5 m.H o.v N am N.m w v m H m.m m m H m b H m H h m 0H um: :4 . . . a: 0.0m m.mH m.mv m.HN o.NH v.Nm m o v.v m m m.o v o N N n o m o m o v o m H o m NH H h ":0 pmHmnmq .musoz «N uwuwd muoom Ewum mm>omq muOOm Emum mm>owH muoom Emum mw>mwg muoom Eoum mo>ooq muoom Ecum mo>ooq muoom Ewum m0>m®q pmwmmwmmx muamsm moHo< oHcomuo moHod ocHE< owcHnEou mcoHuooum HH< manaHomcu Hocmzum oHnsHom uwuozncoz Inuomuuxm Hocazuu oHnsHom umumzuuuomuuxm HocoSum "CH wuH>Huo< HMuOB mo ucmoumm ago“ no comm co omHmnMH mum; mmcHHvomm cam on» an can mac H nmumm mmcHHomom unsoonmcon mo muoon can .Ewum .mm>mmH Eouu nouomuuxm chHuomum Hanna oucH o VH .cOmmwm mcH3oum may mcHusc mmumo moans .commmm mcHzoum umnHm mg» no mo coHumnomnoocH so pommmm ch0mmmmun.mH mqmda magajggwmawmW 01747 9530