.Tfin. ‘ “AWN-ha L . :w «m , fly..- .3 “durum? . (r4... . llr ‘ cumm.vsn L, :1! . ,1! .. J all. L 1.5. x I: ”13.4.9.0! . be.” A .8 Muwwwnmfiyfi ”J. 0.]. mm 9 n. M" t {1...} «24.13; . I .l \r J - .3 :v fi....f..21....brrs. an. L....§...hr. 6:. e I: .. ,2 I ‘...l.' .\b o . .. 1.1.3: , .52-: This is to certify that the thesis entitled EFFICACY 0F 2S-HYDROXYCHOLECALCIFEROL ON THE PREVENTION OF TIBIAL DYSCHONDROPLASIA IN ROSS BROILER CHICKS presented by MARTIN F. LEDWABA has been accepted towards fulfillment of the requirements for MASTER dggree in ANIMAL SCIENCE {at fl/w , A Major professor Date 455%; 0-7639 MS U is an Affirmative Action/Equal Opportunity Institution LIBRARY Michigan State University PLACE IN RETURN BOX to remove this checkout from your record. To AVOID FINES return on or before date due. MAY BE RECALLED with earlier due date if requested. DATE DUE DATE DUE DATE DUE 6/01 c:/CIRC/DatoDue.p65«p.15 EFFICACY OF 25-HYDROXYCHOLECALCIFEROL ON THE PREVENTION OF TIBIAL DYCHONDROPLASIA IN ROSS BROILER CHICKS By Martin F. Ledwaba A THESIS Submitted to Michigan State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE Department of Animal Science 2002 ABSTRACT EFFICACY OF 25-HYDROXYCHOLECALCIFEROL ON THE PREVENTION OF TIBIAL DYCHONDROPLASIA IN ROSS BROILER CHICKS By Martin F. Ledwaba Six experiments were conducted to study the effects of 25-hydroxycholecalciferol (ZS-(OH) D3) on growth performance, incidence and severity of tibial dyschondroplasia (TD) and phytate phosphorus retention in Male Ross x Ross broilers grown in battery brooders. Experiment 1 was a 2 x 3 factorial design with 2 levels of ultraviolet (UV) light (no UV-light and UV-light) and 3 concentrations of 25-(OH)D3. In Experiment 2 chicks were fed a TD-inducing diet and in Experiment 3-6 a normal broiler starter diet. In Experiments 2-6 all chicks received no UV-light and their diets were supplemented with various levels of 25-(OH)D3 ranging from O, 10, 18, 36, 40, 54, 70, 72 or 90ug/kg depending on the experiment. Experiment 6 included a grower phase, that consisted of birds transferred from the starter phase, in which a grower diet was fed supplemented with 25-(OH)D3. The UV-light, 25-(OH)D3 or the combination of both improved growth performance, phosphorus utilization and reduced rickets, severity and incidence of TD. Supplementation with 25-(OH)D3 does not seem to improve performance in normal starter or grower broiler diets. Severity and incidence of TD decreased linearly only in Experiments 2 and 3 with 25-(OH)D3 supplementation. From the data we conclude that the low TD incidence observed with 25-(OH)D3 supplementation is partly due to Ross x Ross strain. Lower levels of 25-(OH)D3 can increase phytate phosphorus in broiler starter diets and 40 pg/kg can improve phytate phosphorus retention in grower diets. I dedicate this thesis to my grandfather France Ledwaba who I never got to meet before he passed and who never had the opportunity to learn how to read and write while he was alive. iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank all the people that were helpful in this project which include my advisor, committee members, faculty, staff, graduate assistants, farm manager and family: Dr. Kevin Roberson- thank you for giving me the opportunity to do a Masters Degree. Dr. Richard Balander- thank you for the inspiration and encouragement. Dr. Michael Orth and Dr. Richard Fulton - thank you for your support and guidance. Angelo Napolitano- thank you for all the help and positive encouragement. Dr. Gretchen Hill and Dr. Allen - thank you for letting me use your lab. Jane Link, Dana Dvoracek-Driksna, Dave Maine, Ying“Jacky”Yun, and Dewey Longuski- thank you for all the help in the lab. A Special thanks to Dr. James E. Jay “Tabo”. -without your encouragement, guidance, and support I could not have completed this project. Finally, I would like to thank my parents who are the foundation of my determination and force. I love you with all my heart. iv TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES ............................................................................................................ vii LIST OF FIGURES ........................................................................................................... ix LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS ............................................................................................ xi INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................. 1 CHAPTER 1 LITERATURE REVIEW ................................................................................................... 3 The Vitamin D System and 25-(OH)D3 ............................................................... 3 The Effect of Vitamin D on the Intestine .......................................................... 10 Calcium Absorption ..................................................................... 10 Phosphorus absorption ................................................................. 11 The Effect of Vitamin D on the Kidney ............................................................ 13 The Effect of Vitamin D in Bone ....................................................................... l4 Tibial Dyschondroplasia .................................................................................... 19 25-Hydroxycholecalciferol Supplementation .................................................... 32 REFERENCES ................................................................................................................. 38 CHAPTER 2 Materials and Methods ....................................................................................... 47 General Procedure ........................................................................ 47 Bone ............................................................................................. 50 Feed .............................................................................................. 5 l Excreta ......................................................................................... 52 Blood ............................................................................................ 52 Statistical Analysis ....................................................................... 53 Results ................................................................................................................ 54 Experiment 1 ................................................................................. 54 Experiment 2 ................................................................................. 55 Experiment 3 ................................................................................. 56 Experiment 4 ................................................................................. 57 Experiment 5 ................................................................................. 58 Experiment 6 ................................................................................. 59 Starter ......................................................................... 59 Grower ....................................................................... 59 Discussion .......................................................................................................... 60 CHAPTER 3 SUMMARY, CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATION ..................................................... 77 REFERENCES ............................................................................................................... 1 10 vi LIST OF TABLES Table 1. Composition of the experimental diets 48 Table 2. Summary of Experiments 79 Table 3. Summary of Experiments 80 Table 4. Summary of results (compared to control) 81 Table 5. Effects of ultraviolet light and 25-hydroxycholecalciferol on performance, serum calcium and phosphorus, and phytate phosphorus retention in 16-day Ross X Ross broiler chicks fed a Vitamin D3 deficient diet, Experiment 1 ....... 96 Table 7. Effects of 25-hydroxycholecalciferol on performance, serum calcium and phosphorus, and phytate phosphorus retention in 17 -day Ross X Arbor Acres broiler chicks fed 3 Vitamin D3 deficient diet, Experiment 2. 98 Table 8. Effects of 25-hydroxycholecalciferol on incidence and severity of tibial dyschondroplasia and percentage bone ash in 17-day Ross X Arbor Acres broiler chicks fed a Vitamin D3 deficient diet, Experiment 2. 99 Table 9. Effects of 25-hydroxycholecalciferol on performance, serum calcium and phosphorus, and phytate phosphorus retention in 20-day Ross X Ross broiler chicks fed a normal broiler starter diet, Experiment 3. 100 Table 10. Effects of 25-hydroxycholecalciferol on incidence and severity of tibial dyschondroplasia and percentage bone ash in 20-day Ross X Ross broiler chicks fed a normal broiler starter diet, Experiment 3. 101 Table 11. Effects of 25-hydroxycholecalciferol on performance, serum calcium and phosphorus, and phytate phosphorus retention in 20-day Ross X Ross broiler chicks fed a normal broiler starter diet, Experiment 4. 102 Table 12. Effects of 25-hydroxycholecalciferol on incidence and severity of tibial dyschondroplasia and percentage bone ash in 20-day Ross X Ross broiler chicks fed a normal broiler starter diet, Experiment 4. 103 Table 13. Effects of 25-hydroxycholecalciferol on performance, serum calcium and phosphorus, and phytate phosphorus retention in 20-day Ross X Ross broiler chicks fed a normal broiler starter diet, Experiment 5. 104 vii Table 14. Effects of ZS-hydroxycholecalciferol on incidence and severity of tibial dyschondroplasia and percentage bone ash in 20-day Ross X Ross broiler chicks fed a normal broiler starter diet, Experiment 5. 105 Table 15. Effects of 25-hydroxycholecalciferol on performance, serum calcium and phosphorus, and phytate phosphorus retention in 17-day Ross X Ross broiler chicks fed a normal broiler starter diet, Experiment 6. 106 Table 16. Effects of 25-hydroxycholecalciferol on incidence and severity of tibial dyschondroplasia and percentage bone ash in 17-day Ross X Ross broiler chicks fed a normal broiler starter diet, Experiment 6. 107 Table 17. Effects of 25-hydroxycholecalciferol on performance, serum calcium and phosphorus, phytate phosphorus retention and incidence and severity of leg- weakness in 35-day Ross X Ross broiler chicks fed a normal broiler grower diet, Experiment 6. 108 Table 18. Effects of 25-hydroxycholecalciferol on incidence and severity of tibial dyschondroplasia and percentage bone ash in 35-day Ross X Ross broiler chicks fed a normal broiler grower diet, Experiment 6. 109 viii LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1. Diagram of Vitamin D3 production from 7-dehydroxycholecalciferol by ultraviolet light 5 Figure 2. Diagram of Vitamin D metabolism. 7 Figure. 4. Effects of dietary 25-(OH)D3 with or without UV-light on 16-day body weight. (Experiment 1). 82 Figure 5. Effects of dietary 25-(OH)D3 with or without UV-light on rickets incidence at 16 days of age (Experiment 1). 83 Figure 6. Effects of dietary 25-(OH)D3 with or without UV-light on TD incidence at 16 days of age (Experiment 1). 84 Figure 7. Effects of dietary 25-(OH)D3 with or without UV-light on TD severity (N3%) at 16 days of age (Experiment 1). 8S Figure 8. Effects of dietary 25-(OH)D3 on TD incidence at 17 days of age (EXPeriment 2) 86 Figure 9. Effects of dietary 25-(OH)D3 on TD severity (%N3) at 17 days of age (Experiment 2)- 87 Figure 10. Effects of dietary 25-(OH)D3 on % phytate phosphorus (PP) retention at 17 days of age (Experiment 2). 88 Figure 11. Effects of dietary 25-(OH)D3 on TD incidence at 20 days of age (Experiment 3). 89 Figure 12. Effects of dietary 25-(OH)D3 on TD severity (%N3) at 20 days of age (Experiment 3)- 90 Figure 13. Effects of dietary 25-(OH)D3 on % phytate phosphorus retention (PP) at 20 days of age (Experiment 3). 91 Figure 14. Effects of dietary 25-(OH)D3 on TD incidence at 20 days of age (Experiment 4)- 92 Figure 16. Effects of dietary 25-(OH)D3 on TD incidence at 20 days of age (Experiment 5)- 93 ix Figure 17. Effects of dietary 25-(OH)D3 on TD incidence at 17 days of age (Experiment 6, Phase I). - - 94 Figure 18. Effects of dietary 25-(OH)D3 on % phytate phosphorus retention at 35 days of age (Experiment 6, Phase II). 95 LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS ATP- Adenosine triphosphate BMP- Bone morphogenetic protein CaBP- Calcium binding protein DBP- vitamin D binding protein ECF- Extracellular fluid HTD- High TD incidence LTD- Low TD incidence NpP- Non-phytate phosphorus Pi- Inorganic phosphorus PTH- Parathyroid hormone TD- Tibial dyschondroplasia TGFB- Transforming growth factor-beta VBP- Vitamin D binding protein VDR- Vitamin D receptor xi INTRODUCTION Improved growth rates and feed efficiency have been the primary concerns for broiler breeders over the past years. Geneticists have selected for these economic traits and in turn nutritionists have made it possible to provide the necessary combination of nutrients to optimize those traits. As the meat-type commercial poultry industry grew, so have the birds used for production. As a result, metabolic parameters of the young growing birds have come under heavy pressure causing muscle growth and skeletal development to be out of synchrony. Skeletal deformities and leg weakness have become one of the major problems to the poultry industry from the standpoint of economics and welfare. Skeletal problems likely cause the broiler industry close to 120 million and the turkey industry 40 million dollars in losses every year (Sullivan, 1994). Tibial dyschondrOplasia (TD) is a common skeletal abnormality found in young rapidly growing meat-type poultry (ducks, broiler chickens and turkeys) and is influenced by nutrition as well as genetics (Riddel, 1981; Edwards, 1984). Tibial Dyschondroplasia is a bone abnormality arising from a growth disorder in endochondral long bone and lesions associated with TD were first observed by Leach and Nesheim (1965). In TD, ossification of the hypertrophic region of the growth plate does not occur. The cartilage which is responsible for long bone growth in young birds is not replaced by bone, but is instead retained, leaving an island of degenerative cartilage cells that are arrested in early hypertrophy (Hargest et al., 1985). The soft cartilage that remains in a TD growth plate may lead to distress to the bird and as a result they are reluctant to walk. Reluctance in walking often results in a change in feeding behavior and body weight gain is negatively affected. As a result, the number of culls increases when birds become weak and are not reaching target weights (Morris, 1993). Squatting or sitting can increase breast blisters, the part of the bird that holds the most value in the poultry meat market. In addition, the bone is more prone to deformities and breakage especially during processing which can lead to downgrading of the carcass or condemnation (Burton et al., 1981). Dietary supplementation with various Vitamin D3 metabolites to low calcium diets as well as to diets adequate in calcium can reduce the incidence and severity of TD (Edwards, 1989, 1990; Rennie et al., 1993, 1995.). The vitamin D3 metabolite that is most commonly used as a feed additive and is available commercially today is 25- hydroxycholecalciferol (25-(OH)D3). Feeding 25-(OH)D3 provides growth stimulation in addition to TD prevention and the metabolite can improve phosphorus utilization in broiler chicks. Phosphorus pollution in the soil and water has been blamed partially on the poultry industry due to run-off from fields in which manure/litter has been used as fertilizer. Few studies have been published on the effectiveness of 25-(OH)D3 on the digestibility of phosphorus (Applegate et al., 2000; Angel et al., 2001). Previous studies on requirements for 25-(OH)D3 in the diet of broiler chicks are _ mainly based on weight gain and feed efficiency (McNutt and Haussler, 1973; Cantor and Bacon, 1978; Yarger et al 1996). However, the inconsistent results in recent studies with 25-(OH)D3 on TD incidence and severity suggest that the requirement for 25-(OH)D3 might be substantially lower than recommended. The objective of this study is to provide more information on the effectiveness of 25-(OH)D3 in reducing TD incidence and severity and improving phosphorus utilization without compromising performance specifically when a marginal calcium diet is fed (85%). CHAPTER 1 LITERATURE REVIEW The Vitamin D System and 25-(OH)D3 Vitamin D is the collective name given to a family of compounds or related sterols that exhibit anti-rachitic activity (curing or preventing rickets). The metabolite, 25-hydroxycholecalciferol, is one of the compounds that belongs to the vitamin D family. Vitamin D is characterized as a fat-soluble vitamin and was first named and discovered by McCullom in 1922 (McDowell, 1989). Before its discovery, vitamin D activity was linked to vitamin A. This was true until the findings that cod-liver oil, which was known to exhibit strong vitamin A and anti-rachitic activity, still preserved its anti-rachitic activity after all vitamin A had been destroyed in the oil. A more traditional cure for rickets, which was known long before the discovery of the nutritional cure from vitamin D, is the healing property of UV-light. However, the mutual relationship between vitamin D and UV-light in healing rickets was recognized after experiments showed that UV-light exposure increased production of vitamin D in livers of animals (Goldblatt and Soames, 1923) and stimulated vitamin D activity in certain foods (Steenbock and Black, 1924). Identification of the vitamin D form, vitamin D3, occurred in 1931 and the precursor to vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol), 7— dehydrocholesterol, was first isolated from the skin in pigs in 1937 (Deluca, 1982). It was not until the 1960’s that studies showed Vitamin D3 (the parent metabolite) could be metabolized to different metabolites and that at least one of these metabolites functioned as an active hormone (Deluca, 1979). The first metabolite of cholecalciferol to be identified and isolated was 25-hydroxycholecalciferol (Blunt et al., 1968). The vitamin D molecule including all its metabolites, is a secosteroid and its structure consist of 4 rings of a cyclopentanoperhydrophenanthrene system in which one ring, the B-ring, has undergone fission and is opened, distinguishing it from classical steroids. The structure also consists of differing side chains from one secosteroid to another. (See figure l-diagram of structure.) The most prominent secosteroids or forms of vitamin D are ergocalciferol (vitamin D2) and cholecalciferol (vitamin D3). These two different forms of vitamin D are derived from pre-cursors known as ergosterol and 7- dehydrocholesterol, respectively. Only after irradiation by UV-light, are these pre-cursors characterized as a form of vitamin D (Norman, 1990). Ergocalciferol can be manufactured synthetically from plant sterols. Vitamin D2 cannot be efficiently metabolized by birds and is therefore not considered a functional metabolite in this species (Valinetse and Bauman, 1981). In contrast, 7 -dehydrocholesterol that is derived from cholesterol occurs naturally and is found in animal tissue. It can be synthesized in the liver during normal steroid production then transported to the skin by a transporter protein (Soares, 1984). Moreover, 7-dehydrocholesterol can be produced directly from cholesterol in the epithelial cells of the skin, as well as in the intestinal wall (Klasing, 1998). The vitamin D precursor, 7-dehydrocholesterol, is more common in the skin of the legs and feet of chickens than in the body (Koch and Koch, 1941). The oil of the preen- gland (uropygial gland) also contains some amounts of this pro-vitamin. During preening it may be spread onto the feathers, and is subsequently converted into vitamin D after which ingestion may occur, but in a very inefficient way (Taylor and Dacke, 1984). The conjugated double bond system (double bonds five to seven) in the B-ring of the Figure 1. Diagram of Vitamin D3 production from 7- dehydroxycholecalciferol by ultraviolet light 7 -dehydrocholesterol ergosterol hy hV Cholecalciferol Ergocalciferol (Vitamin D2) (Vitamin D3) Adapted from Syed N asrat Imam (2001). provitamin structure allows absorption of UV-photons, preferably of wavelength 285-315 nm, transforming 7-dehydrocholesterol to the pre-vitamin D3 (Norman, 1990). The final and complete cholecalciferol is only formed after 2-3 days of thermal isomerization which involves a series of transformations of its structure with rotations of the A—n'ng (McDowell, 1989). The cholecalciferol that is formed in the skin is absorbed into the blood and transported by a binding protein (Gc globulin; group—specific component), which is mostly a gamma globulin in birds, but may be an alpha and beta globulin as well in some avian species (Dacke, 2000). The binding protein protects the vitamin from being inactivated by oxidation. Cholecalciferol has little metabolic activity and is highly hydrophobic. It can be stored in only limited amounts, especially in birds, mostly in adipose tissue from where it can be released slowly during vitamin D deficiency (Hurwitz, 1989). Cholecalciferol in circulation is rapidly carried to the liver and metabolized into 25-(OH)D3. Although, the liver is the major site of the conversion, it may also take place in small amounts in the kidney and intestine (Tucker et al., 1973). During the transformation of cholecalciferol into 25-(OH)D3, a hepatic enzyme, 25- hydroxylase, hydroxylates the 25th carbon of the side-chain (see figure 2.). The hydroxylation primarily takes place in the rnicrosome, apparently because the microsomal enzyme has a low Km or a high affinity for its substrate, but it can also occur in the mitochondria especially during excessive levels of cholecalciferol. The 25- hydroxylase requires N ADPH, molecular oxygen, cytochrome P450, and flavoprotein (Deluca, 1979). The enzyme is one of the P450 hydroxylases and its activity does not seem to be regulated by 25-(OH)D3 or 1,25-dihydroxycholecalciferol (1,25(OH)2D3). The ‘D ‘8 >263 05.8.:— oaemi 33:32:: 2.3— 3.03am m. ._w_.me._mmm_uwww.mhwwmfimmm age: _e§a_3..._2_§eEases..." usageéaak a9»: .euozoioo—eaozxeuemgén unSaWEVéAN @ 253:: A— 583; iii :2» .EogsefieEEeFB 5‘. - 55—2—32: a £83; a: Saunas .N 9.5a:— 25-hydroxylase may be under limited control and an increase or decrease in dietary cholecalciferol or UV-light exposure results in a linear increase/decrease in plasma concentration levels of 25-(OH)D3, respectively (Soares et al., 1995). This correlation has made circulating 25-(OH)D3 an appropriate index for assessing vitamin D status in birds. The 25-(OH)D3 metabolite is the major circulating metabolite, serving as the major storage form of all the vitamin D metabolites. In comparison to cholecalciferol, the 25- (OH)D3 metabolite is absorbed more efficiently when these metabolites are given orally, 66.5% vs. 83.6%, respectively (Bar et al., 1980). The hydroxylation to 25-(OH)D3 improves water solubility (Blunt et al., 1968) and the storage site where majority of 25- (OH)D3 can be found, is in the blood. The half-life of 25-(OH)D3 in blood is about 3 weeks (Holick, 1990). In circulation, 25-(OH)D3 is mostly bound to the vitamin D binding protein(VBP). The binding affinity of 25-(OH)D3 towards the VBP is higher than most metabolites, especially 1,25(OH)2D3 and cholecalciferol (Soares et al., 1995). Vitamin D binding protein transports 25-(OH)D3 to the kidney where it is further metabolized. In the kidney a second hydroxylation occurs at the 1 carbon position, and the enzyme responsible for converting 25-(OH)D3 into 1,25(OH)2D3 is called 25-(OI-DD3-l-0t- hydroxylase. This particular enzyme is found in the mitochondria of the proximal tubules of the kidney. This enzyme is a mixed function oxidase and requires 3 proteins; P450- cytochrome, iron-sulfur protein (renal ferrodoxin) and flavoprotein (Deluca, 1979). Similarly to 25-hydroxylase, NADPH fuels this particular system. The l-a-hydroxylase is under very strict control and is found in very low levels under normal conditions. However, during vitamin D deficiency when hypocalcemia sets in, the parathyroid glandsecretes parathyroid hormone (PTH), which in turn stimulates the activity of 1-0t- hydroxylase. Hypophosphotemia also regulates this enzyme, but not through PTH. In addition, the enzyme reaction is product stimulated, its activity being modulated by 1,25(OH)2D3 itself via a powerful feedback mechanism. The metabolite 1,25(OH)2D3 is the metabolically active form of vitamin D and acts as a hormone in various tissues (Soares, 1984). Moreover, 1,25(OH)2D3 is more rapid than 25-(OH)D3 in inducing the classical effects of vitamin D (DeLuca, 1973) and this might explain why 1,25(OH)2D3 has a relatively short half-life of 4 to 6 hours in the blood (Groff and Gropper, 2000a). During periods of low circulating levels of 1,25(OH)2D3, the activity is increased. Whereas, when circulating levels of 1,25(OH)2D3 are in excess, activity is suppressed (Henry and Norman, 1984). During the latter circumstances, another hydroxylation is taking place, primarily in the kidney. This is also a mitochondrial enzyme, but this step involves 24-hydroxylation. The 1,25(OH)2D3-24-hydroxylase has the ability to convert 25-(OH)D3 to 24,25(OH)2D3 thereby preventing the formation of 1,25(OH)2D3. The 24- hydroxylase enzyme can also be expressed at target tissue sites of 1,25(OH)2D3. The enzyme is very important in reducing the life span of 1,25(OH)2D3 initiating catabolism . of the metabolite. The 24,25(OH)2D3 metabolite is rapidly excreted in chickens and therefore believed to serve as an excretory route for excess 25-(OH)D3 (Holick et al., 1976). The metabolite, 24,25(OH)2D3, also appears to play an important role in normal bone formation (Omoy et al., 1978). It has been demonstrated that 24,25(OH)2D3 has biological activity in the chondrocytes of the growth plate (Corvol etal., 1978; Suda et al., 1985). Atkin et a1. ( 1985) suggested that 24,25(OH)2D3 promotes cartilage maturation, differentiation and bone mineralization. Many other hydroxylations can take place resulting in many different vitamin D metabolites, of which 35 or more have been isolated and chemically identified. However, the primary metabolites that support normal mineralization in bone and/or calcium and phosphorus homeostasis are 1,25(OH)2D3, 24,25(OH)2D3 and 25-(OH)D3. The Effect of Vitamin D on the Intestine Calcium Absorption In order for bone to function properly the bone matrix must mineralize. Several minerals, but primarily calcium and phosphorus need to be in the blood to enter the bone fluid. Calcium (Ca) is in the form of Ca 2+ or amorphous calcium phosphate [Ca3(P04)2] in solution. This non-crystalline Ca will precipitate out as salts on the surface of the bone and eventually be converted into hydroxyapatite [Calo(PO4)6(OH)6] (crystalline calcium) to complete the ossification process. Digestion and absorption of dietary calcium accounts for a large part of the calcium influx into the blood. This is especially true in young birds, which are still growing and have limited calcium stores in the skeleton. Calcium absorption takes place primarily in the small intestine particularly from the duodenum and jejenum. (Larbier and Leclercq, 1992). Calcium is absorbed in the intestine by two main mechanisms. One occurs by a passive, unregulated, also referred to as non-saturable mechanism, that takes place in between the cells or enterocytes by diffusion. This pathway is often used when calcium intake is elevated (Bronner, 1990). The other component involves the active energy dependent or saturable mechanism and is active when calcium levels are low in the blood. In this case the transport of Ca is across an enterocyte and is a protein-facilitated process, which is mediated by calcium binding 10 protein (CaBP or calbindin). Calcium binding protein serves as a protein carrier across the basolateral membrane and is regulated by the vitamin D metabolite 1,25-OH2D3 (Groff and Gropper, 2000b). When vitamin D deficient chicks were administered a dose of 1,25-OH2D3, the nuclear receptors of the vitamin D dependent CaBP (calbindin-ngK) in the chick intestine were saturated with the hormone (Theofan et al., 1986). As a result, calbindin-ngK-mRNA as well as CaBP levels were significantly increased. When interacting with an intracellular nuclear vitamin D receptor protein (VDR) of its target tissue, in this case the intestine, l,25(OI-I)2D3 can form a VDR-1,25(OH)2D3 complex. This complex can influence gene transcription by induction or suppression of promoter regions containing a VDR response element. Hence, 1,25(OH)2D3 can improve calcium absorption by interacting with the DNA of the enterocyte and promoting the synthesis of CaBP as mentioned (Groff and Gropper, 2000b). It is also believed that 1,25(OH)2D3 can stimulate Ca absorption directly by inducing changes in the basolateral membrane, a process known as transcaltachia (Nemere and Anthony, 1990). Although, fractional calcium absorption by the gut is fairly poor (about 30-50% of ingested calcium) 1,25(OH)2D3 has the potential to increase calcium absorption up to 75% (Aumaud, 1990). Phosphorus absorption The active metabolite, 1,25(OH)2D3, not only plays a significant role in the calcium absorption process, but also in phosphorus absorption. Phosphorus can be absorbed from the jejenum in the small intestine. As with calcium, absorption of phosphorus can occur via two mechanisms; the passive unregulated mechanism which is 11 a diffusion process and/or the ATP-regulated process which is coupled to a transport system involving sodium (Larbier and Leclercq, 1992). The hormone, 1,25(OH)2D3, is believed to accelerate this sodium dependent transport system (Klasing, 1998). The metabolite, 1,25(OH)2D3, interacts with a receptor in the basolateral membrane of the duodenal loop which in turn triggers lysosomes present there. These lysosomal vesicles are believed to transport phosphate in a similar fashion in which calcium is transported during transcaltachia (Nemere, 1996). Also, other vitamin D metabolites such as 24, 25(OH)2D3 as well as 25-(OH)D3 may have specific receptors (Nemere, 1994). Vitamin D, via its active metabolite, appears to also improve phosphorus absorption by increasing the activity of alkaline phosphatase in the brushborder membrane (Groff and Gropper, 2000a). Alkaline phosphatase (zinc-dependent enzyme) helps in the hydrolysis of organic phosphates (Bikle et al., 1979). However, its role in phosphate transport across the membrane is unclear (Bikle et al., 1979). Davies (1970) reported a small, but gradual increase in the activity of alkaline phosphatase when phosphorus deficient diets (0.16% P, 1.0% Ca) were supplemented with 750 ICU (18.7 jig/kg) or 187.5 ug/kg of cholecalciferol (Davies et al., 1970). However, when phosphorus was adequate (0.48% available P) in the basal diet, vitamin D3 supplementation did not increase the activity of alkaline phosphatase. The stimulation of alkaline phosphatase by vitamin D is minimal and it is difficult to explain the fact that alkaline phosphatase is mostly found in the duodenum where the pH is low (acidic), but phosphate absorption is highest in jejenum where the pH is high (alkaline) (Harrison and Harrison, 1961). 12 The Effect of Vitamin D on the Kidney Understanding the ability of vitamin D to act in the kidney, as this tissue serves a major role in maintaining the phosphorus and calcium balance in the body is crucial. The kidney will excrete more than 80% of the phosphorus that is absorbed by the body. In the event of a phosphorus deficiency, reabsorption of phosphorus can help the body maintain a positive balance, especially since reducing renal excretion by as little as 50% is equivalent to increasing dietary intake of phosphorus by three times (Aumaud, 1990). Calcitrol (1,25(OH)2D3) may stimulate reabsorption of phosphorus in the distal renal tubule. Showing that 1,25(OH)2D3 directly stimulates renal reabsorption of phosphate has been difficult, because of the secondary effect caused by vitamin D in viva i.e. increased serum calcium and serum phosphate as well as low levels of PTH (Maxwell and Kleeman, 1994b). In other words, when the body experiences low levels of phosphorus, there will be increased levels of ionized calcium causing PTH levels to decrease. This low level of PTH signals the removal of the PTH-block on renal phosphate reabsorption, leading to increased phosphate retention (Deluca, 1979). At the same time 1,25(OH)2D3 increases due to the low phosphorus levels. There is confusion as to whether 1,25(OH)2D3 stimulates the kidney directly or indirectly by lowering PTH and hence the removal of the PTH-block on kidney reabsorption of phosphate. Liang et al. (1982) has shown that isolated renal chick cells have increased phosphate uptake during administration of 1,25(OH)2D3 in vitro. Also, in humans during failure of renal tubular reabsorption of phosphate due to disease there are corresponding low circulating levels of 1,25(OH)3D3 (Bell, 1985). Furthermore, during prolonged absence of vitamin D, the hypophosphotemia (low plasma phosphorus) that often follows is partly due to the 13 increased clearance of phosphate as a result of reduced renal reabsorption of organic phosphate (McDowell, 1989). Nevertheless, the reduction in P excretion when vitamin D is administered could also be attributed to increased P deposition into the skeleton, an event that is also stimulated by vitamin D (Maxwell and Kleeman, 1994b). Sutton & Dirks (1978) showed that 1,25(OH)2D3 improves calcium reabsorption by the kidney and vitamin D dependent CaBP (calbindin-D28K) is also present in this tissue (Christakos et al., 1979; Roth et al., 1982). However, the majority of calcium (98%) that filters through the kidney is reabsorbed without the influence of 1,25(OH)2D3 or PTH. The remaining 2% of the filtered load that is reabsorbed is believed to actually be stimulated by PTH and 1,25(OH)2D3, both acting in concert, and not solely by 1,25(OH)2D3 (Deluca, 1982). However, mineral reabsorption by the kidney can regulate plasma concentrations of calcium in the event of short term rises or falls in intestinal absorption and bone losses of calcium. When there is an increase in calcium absorption there must be a corresponding change in calcium excretion to maintain a steady state, this is often accomplished by a decrease in reabsorption by the kidney (Maxwell and Kleeman, 1994a). In order for bone mineralization to take place, one of the challenges is to maintain the mineral constituents of the extracellular fluid. This task is partly controlled by vitamin D stimulated tubular reabsorption of the kidney (Deluca, 1982). The Effect of Vitamin D in Bone In bone 1,25(OH)2D3 may have various actions that are indirectly involved in mineralization, new bone formation, as well as bone resorption. Bone, which is comprised primarily of osteoblasts, osteoclasts and chondrocytes, actively responds to 14 endocrine hormones such as 1,25(OH)2D3, Osteoblasts (bone cells) serve several functions, one of major importance is that of bone matrix synthesis. The bone matrix is made up largely of collagen I and many various bone proteins that are involved in the mineralization process. The capability of 1,25(OH)2D3 to stimulate osteoblasts to synthesize osteocalcin, a localized vitamin K-dependent protein that acts as a chemo- attractant and recruits more osteoblasts into the bone matrix during matrix breakdown, enhances new bone formation. Osteocalcin is a calcium binding protein that can bind to hydroxyapatite and become part of the bone matrix prior to mineralization. Some of the osteocalcin is also released into the blood, and can serve as an indicator of osteoblast metabolism (Maxwell and Kleeman, 1994a). In addition, alkaline phosphatase hydrolyses organic phosphate esters and pyrophosphate, which are known to inhibit the mineralization process. Osteoblasts are believed to express alkaline phosphatase and are in fact very rich in this enzyme. Osteoblasts can also produce growth factors such as transforming growth factor-B (T GF- B), a potent enhancer of bone formation and inhibitor of osteoclasts. Thus, 1,25(OH)2D3 serves an important role in regulating the expression of genes that produce other localized transcription factors or bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs), such as TGF-B, which induce differentiation of chondrocytes and osteoblasts (Maxwell and Kleeman, 1994a). During long bone growth, as the shape of the bone changes or is altered, a process known as modeling is actively occurring. Modeling occurs through resorption and formation of bone at different sites. Resorption does not necessarily follow formation so the two processes are not coupled. If bone modeling does not take place in a normal fashion it can result in different skeletal abnormalities in young growing poultry 15 (Watkins, 1999). Bone resorption during modeling is carried out by osteoclasts. These are multinucleated cells derived from hemapoetic stem cells. The differentiation from stem cell to osteoclast is induced by 1,25(OH)2D3 (Maxwell and Kleeman, 1994a). The principal effect of 1,25 (OH)2D3 on osteoclasts in this particular case is to increase the number of mature osteoclasts. Once the mature osteoclasts are formed, vitamin D receptors (VDRs) in these cells become absent and no further receptor binding of 1,25(OI-I)2D3 occurs (Merke et al., 1986). Suda et al. (1992) found receptors for 1,25(OH)2D3 in osteoblasts, but not in osteoclasts. The active metabolite, 1,25(OH)2D3, can increase the activity of mature osteoclasts, but this is an indirect effect. This indirect effect on mature osteoclasts is mediated by 1,25(OH)2D3 via its action on osteoblasts. In other words, 1,25(OH)2D3 stimulates the osteoblasts to produce various molecules that recruit osteoclasts to activate bone resorption. Endochondral ossification involves the conversion of cartilage into bone. The initial formation of cartilage occurs in three steps. First, mesenchymal cells proliferate. Second, once these cells begin to accumulate they produce extracellular matrix proteins, which induce condensation of these dividing cells. In the third step there is differentiation of the mesenchymal cells into chondrocytes. The chondrocytes secrete the cartilage extracellular matrix. When a long bone in the young chick grows, the center of the shaft turns into bone first. Cartilage is replaced by bone progressively outward towards the end of the shaft. At the distal end of the shaft there is a region which is always producing new cartilage as long as the bone grows. This front or region is referred to as the epiphyseal growth plate (see figure 3.). During the mineralization process chondrocytes are replaced by osteoblasts. Before this can take place, the new cartilage being formed in 16 the epiphyseal growth plate must undergo three phases. In a normal growth plate, chondrocytes also pass through three layers: 1) In the zone of resting cells, the chondrocytes have not yet reached full maturity. However, these are committed cells that are actively proliferating and can be characterized by their spherical shape; 2) In the zone of proliferating cells, the cartilage cells have differentiated into mature chondrocytes which are still actively proliferating, but are now depositing cartilage and therefore increasing the length of the bone. These cells have a flattened appearance and are arranged in a columnar fashion; 3) In this zone of hypertrophic cells, chondrocytes have once more differentiated into spherical cells, increasing in size mainly by fluid entering the cytoplasm. These cells have become large (interstitial growth) and are actively depositing calcium in the extracellular matrix. Chondrocyte proliferation in this region would normally be limited by apoptosis or programmed cell death. The hypertrophic chondrocytes are more vulnerable to the invasion of capillaries from the periosteum. This vascularization of the hypertrophic region allows blood to bring in more calcium and osteoblasts, which secrete bone matrix onto which the calcium can precipitate for calcification. This process is crucial for bone mineralization to take place, hence replacement of cartilage by bone (Hargest et al., 1985). Certain vitamin D metabolites, especially 1,25(OH)2D3 have a direct effect on these chondrocytes. The hormone, 1,25(OH)2D3, stimulates differentiation of chondrocytes, promoting the normal development and maturation of cartilage. Farquharson et al. (1993) showed that 1,25(OH)2D3 promotes proliferation as well as differentiation of chondrocytes in vivo and in vitro. Studies have shown that 1,25(OH)2D3 and 24, 25(OH)2D3 can be produced locally by chondrocytes in the growth plate (Suda et 17 fig: 2.50 .m .3 :5: Base... ~',“.1‘{-‘C V 22:25.36 .3 azOu a ............ 1 Lamont—mm»: gazes Egg—<5 ........ ....... . «28 ates—mane"... ..... mzow "oz—5m: a ”.25 flavor—Ema .. magma...— £9... gag—:51. 0‘ COO-'- WLN swam Vii 27"»? - “ “tonnes? in Us I 29399.. 3:2: HUS—MDm UEP800 ICU/kg and reported low TD incidence (24%). This is in contrast to a study conducted by Lofton and Soares (1986), in which TD incidences were rather high at 28 days (40%) after feeding broiler chicks a normal com-soybean meal diet containing 2000 ICU/kg cholecalciferol. Edwards et al. (1992) also reported high TD incidence in l6-day old chicks fed a near adequate calcium (95%) diet containing 2000 ICU/kg. It is also of interest to note that supplementing this normal broiler diet in Experiment 3 with 10 jig/kg of 25-(OH)D3 did not significantly decrease the incidence of the TD lesion or its severity, which is in contrast to Experiment 2. Leach and Lilbum (1992) stated that some other nutritional factors that influence TD incidence may be independent of factors affecting lesion severity and effects may not always be parallel. Incidence and severity of TD in Experiment 3 was not significantly different from the control group until 70 ug/kg 25-(OH)D3 was fed. Experiments 4 and 5 demonstrated that supplementing 25-(OH)D3 as a source of vitamin D activity to reduce TD lesions in modern broiler chicks is not always effective in the Ross x Ross strain. The results showed that TD incidence was consistently down to about 8% when 36 to 54 pig/kg are fed, but was not a statistically significant response even when TD incidence was 22% in the basal group of Experiment 5. This is in contrast to Experiment 3 in which there was a linear decrease in TD incidence and severity at levels of 25-(OH)D3 up to 70 ug/kg. Based on Experiments 3, 4, and 5, feeding 70 rig/kg of 25-(OH)D3 is not much different from feeding intermediate levels in the range of 18 to 54 rig/kg. Mitchell et al. (1997a) also had conflicting results with regards to incidence when the two experiments were compared. In one of the experiments, they reported a significant reduction in TD incidence in LTD line of chicks, from 44% to 10% after 25- (OH)D3 supplementation levels of as low as 5 rig/kg. In another experiment, 5 ug/kg 25- (OH)D3 only reduced TD incidence from 61% to 38% (LTD line) while supplementation levels between 10 to 40 jig/kg resulted in half the TD incidence observed at 5 rig/kg. Rennie and Whitehead (1996) reported 10% TD incidence in Ross broiler chicks at 3 65 weeks of age with dietary addition of 75 jig/kg 25-(OH)D3. Many of the earlier studies have rarely reported TD incidences below 10% with any supplementation level of 25- (OH)D3 when feeding a normal broiler diet. Although complete prevention has been reported, and birds were fed very high levels, 250 jig/kg 25-(OH)D3 in combination with 250 jig/kg ascorbic acid for 3 weeks (Rennie and Whitehead, 1996). The only metabolite of vitamin D that seem to be able to absolutely prevent the condition consistently is the active metabolite, 1,25-(OH)2D3 (Sorenson, 1991; Rennie, 1993) or the synthetic analog la-hydroxycholecalciferol (Edwards, 1990). The TD incidence of the control groups in both experiments reported by Mitchell et al. (1997a) were fairly high compared to our experiments which was very similar in design even when a low TD line was used. The reason for this might possibly be the strain of chicks used in the author’s studies. Some broiler strains are more susceptible to TD than others. When a "I'D-inducing diet was fed to Peterson x Hubbard and Ross x Arbor Acres chicks, the TD incidence and severity was higher, and bone ash lower, in the Peterson x Hubbard for all three experiments (Elliot and Edwards, 1994). In another experiment, Edwards (1984) reported some indication that Ross x Arbor Acres chicks had significantly lower TD incidence compared to Peterson x Hubbard. The Ross strain may have been selected against TD so aggressively over the years that it is fairly resistant to the metabolic disorder, provided that diets are adequate in calcium, phosphorus and cholecalciferol. Genetics plays a significant role in TD incidence and therefore the potency of 25-(OH)D3 in reducing TD depends to a large extent on the broiler strain. Chickens with increased incidence of TD had fewer intestinal vitamin D receptors (VDR) than chickens with low incidence (Soares et al., 1990). Comparisons between 66 HTD and LTD lines developed by Auburn University shows higher bone ash in LTD line chicks and plasma concentrations of 25-(OH)D3 and 1,25-(OH)2D3 lower or equal to HTD line chicks. When Rennie and Whitehead (1996) fed a wheat based commercial basal diet without 25-(OH)D3 supplementation to Ross chicks, the incidence was fairly high (64%) displaying a TD incidence commonly seen with Peterson parental lines. The reason for the high incidence may be that the basal diet was not a com-soybean diet, but consisted of wheat-soybean diet. The wheat fibers contain non-fermentable fibers that can increase the bulk of intestinal contents, increasing the rate of passage and enhancing gut motility. This reduces the time for calcium absorption. Furthermore, these non-ferrnentable fibers stimulate proliferation of microbes, which in turn binds minerals such as calcium making it less available (Groff, 2000). Traditionally, practical starter diets used in broiler studies on TD have been com-soybean meal based. No published studies compare the effectiveness of com-soybean meal and wheat-soybean meal diets in alleviating TD. However, Edwards (1985) demonstrated that various soybean meals when fed to broilers can produce different TD incidences in chicks depending on the year and source from which the soybean meal was obtained. A soybean meal from one source consistently produced a TD incidence of 34-69% while a soybean meal from another source produced only 14-18%. Leach and Neisheim (1965) stated that com and soybean meal diets appear to have some protective properties against TD. After feeding broiler chicks this type of diet Leach and Neisheim (1965) found that it completely prevented the occurrence of the cartilage abnormality. The investigators speculated that there might be an unidentified nutritional factor affecting bone formation in corn and soybean meal diets. 67 From the results in Experiment 6, it is difficult to know whether 25-(OH)D3 has any effect on TD incidence at all in the current Ross x Ross broiler chick when fed a normal broiler diet. The speculation that intermediate levels within the range of 18 to 40 pig/kg 25-(OH)D3 based from the previous experiments were necessary to reduce TD incidence and severity, can be disputed. The low TD incidence of 12% with the control diet suggests that the chicks were fairly resistant to the development of the cartilage abnormality. On the other hand, it is possible that a significant number of the birds that were not examined at l7-days and used for phase 2 had the TD condition at the time and were not accounted for in the TD incidence of phase 1. The lesion in these second phase birds might have spontaneously resorbed by 35-days of age, hence the low incidence in the second phase birds. The majority of the TD lesions of the control group of phase 1 might have been less severe TD scores and therefore more easily resorbed during the grower phase. As birds mature, the vitamin D system becomes more efficient with regards to the conversion of cholecalciferol or 25-(OH)D3 to 1,25-(OH)zD3 which is less efficient in young, immature and rapidly growing broilers (Edwards, 1989; Edwards, 1990). It is difficult to see any response by 25-(OH)D3 on TD during the grower phase since we do not know accurately the birds subclinical condition at 17-days of age. However, no effect was observed on TD in the second phase of Experiment 6. This is in contrast to Zhang et al. (1997) who saw a slight decrease in TD incidence of LTD line birds when fed a grower diet supplemented with 68.9 and 344.5 jig/kg from 4 to 6 weeks of age. Birds fed the control diet in Zhang et al. (1997) had a similar TD incidence at 6 weeks and at 4 weeks of 17.2% and 14.2%, respectively. The control birds in phase 2 of Experiment 6 in our study had virtually no TD incidence at 5 weeks of age. This is in 68 contrast with Scheideler and Ferket (2000) who reported 17.5% TD incidence at 3 weeks and 20% at 9 weeks in a flock of male Ross x Ross birds fed a normal starter and grower broiler diet, respectively. Environmental factors might also have played a role in the low TD incidence as well as severity observed in the non-supplemented birds of Experiment 4, 5 and 6. Birds that are exposed to stress during their growth period may have higher incidence of TD. Stressed birds have greater susceptibility to infection as the immune system is suppressed. Toxic stresses which result in malabsorption of nutrients such as the fat- soluble vitamin D3 (fat-malabsorption) that are essential for bone development and growth can increase TD incidence (Calabotta, 1997). Stress levels are more likely to be higher under commercial conditions. The level of stress that birds experienced during the experimental periods might not have been high enough to induce a strong effect on the development of TD. The type of surface that broiler chicks are raised on also influences the incidence of TD. In the commercial broiler industry, broiler chicks are commonly raised on the floor of various litters depending on the farm and flocks often exhibit 15 to 30% TD incidence (Veltrnann and Jensen, 1980). In a study by Veltrnann and Jensen (1980), four-week old broiler chicks raised on wood shavings had 39% TD incidence versus 2% incidence in chicks raised on wire floors of battery brooders. In another study, chicks raised on wire floors had 8% TD versus 26% in chicks raised on conventional floor pens. Certain types of mycotoxins have been shown to induce TD up to 85-90% in chicks if the compound is present in feed (W alser et al., 1980) but a major outbreak of mycotoxins in the feed is fairly rare and probably only plays a small factor in increased TD incidence in the modern broiler industry. 69 Phytate phosphorus retention was clearly improved by ultraviolet light in Experiment 1 as vitamin D activity increased resulting in an increased degradation of phytate phosphorus. The improved retention of phosphorus and possibly calcium probably allowed an increased availability of these minerals contributing to the improved bone ash and reduction of rickets incidence in Experiment 1. Cations such as calcium can chelate to phosphate groups of phytic acid forming insoluble Ca-phytate complexes in the intestine (Nelson and Kirby, 1987). When the phytate is hydrolyzed minerals such as calcium that are part of the molecule are released. Shafey et al. (1990) suggested that cholecalciferol stimulates this hydrolysis resulting in enhanced absorption of both phosphorus and calcium. The linear increase observed on phytate phosphorus retention by the increasing levels of dietary 25-(OH)D3 in Experiment 2 confirmed that 25-(OH)D3 can improve phosphorus availability in chicks. Angel et al. (2001) reported that 70 jig/kg 25-(OH)D3 had a significant sparing effect (0.035% P spared) on non-phytate phosphorus in Ross chicks fed a diets containing graded levels of non-phytate phosphorus (0.24, 0.32 and 0.40%) and calcium at 0.80%. As with the TD inducing diet of Experiment 2, the retention of phytate phosphorus was also improved in a normal broiler diet in Experiment 3. Recent studies have shown that supplementation of 25-(OH)D3 to broiler diets improve phytate phosphorus utilization. Edwards (1996) reported that a diet containing 0.67% Ca and 0.33% in supplemented with 5 jig/kg 25-(OH)D3 resulted in increased phytate phosphorus retention from 53% to 74%. In our studies, the phytate phosphorus retention was not as high as Edwards (1996) with supplementation of 25-(OH)D3. This difference is probably due to the lower calcium levels used in the study by Edwards (1996). When 70 calcium was decreased from 1.0% to 0.5%, phosphorus utilization was increased by 15 % (Mohammed et al., 1991). When Hubbard X Peterson chicks were fed diets containing 2200 ICU/kg cholecalciferol and 0.33% phytate phosphorus (0.51% total P) with various levels of Ca (0.4 or 0.88%), supplementation of 210 rig/kg 25-(OH)D3 improved ileal hydrolysis of phytate phosphorus from 42.9% to 64 % (Applegate et al., 2000). In our study, the supplementation of 25-(OH)D3 improved phytate phosphorus retention slightly, but significantly at 36 jig/kg in Experiment 4 from 44.2 to 50.2% but not in Experiment 5. However, the phytate phosphorus retention overall in Experiment 5 (average 51.9%) was generally higher than any of the experiments when a marginal calcium diet was fed. Analyzed total phosphorus was slightly lower for Experiment 5 (0.67%). Higher P.- (inorganic phosphorus) are able to inhibit the catalytic action of certain phytases (W oodzinsky and Ullah, 1996). Perhaps 25-(OH)D3 facilitates the activity of phytase in the hydrolysis of phytic acid indirectly by transporting P,- away from the intestinal mucosa into the blood, hence decreasing the inhibitory effect of P,-. The phytate phosphorus retention in Experiment 6 (average 41%) for the starter group was also lower than Experiment 5, resulting in no improvement by 40 jig/kg 25-(OH)D3 supplementation. The basal diet had a higher analyzed calcium level of 0.94%, which possibly decreased hydrolysis of phytate. Low bone ash (25.2%) when birds were fed a diet with no added cholecalciferol in Experiment 1 is in agreement with Edwards et al. (1994) who reported 29% under similar conditions in 16-day old birds. Exposing birds to ultraviolet light gave almost an identical response in bone ash (41.6%) compared to Edwards et al. (1994) (42.1%) 71 whereas Elliot and Edwards (1997) observed 37% at 16-days of age. Addition of 10 [lg/kg 25-(OH)D3 in our study resulted in similar bone ash (41.2%) produced by ultraviolet light alone. Sunde (1976) reported that 10 rig/kg 25-(OH)D3 did not result in maximum bone ash at 3 weeks in turkey poults (42.9%) but that it was near the maximum obtained with 25 rig/kg of cholecalciferol (46.7%). Boris et al. (1977) indicated that 25- (OH)D3 is twice as potent as cholecalciferol in maintaining maximum bone ash. Experiment 2 resulted in 41.8 % bone ash with 1100 ICU/kg cholecalciferol in the control diet which confirmed the findings of Boris et al. (1977). However, Edwards et al.( 1996) stated that 1,250 ICU/kg is not adequate to produce maximum bone ash. Experiments 4 and 5 had a fairly consistent bone ash percentage of about an average of 43—44% with 22001CU/kg cholecalciferol with or without 25-(OH)D3 supplementation. However, Experiment 3 had the highest and most consistent bone ash with an average of 45%. Although maximum bone ash was obtained with 36 jig/kg 25-(OH)D3 in Experiment 5, a study by Mitchell et al. (1997a) achieved this at 10 and 20 jig/kg 25- (OH)D3. In Experiments 4 and 5 of the present study, 36 rig/kg 25-(OH)D3 appears to give the best results overall when considering bone ash %, the virtual absence of severe . TD lesions and consistent gain: feed response. The extremely low 17-day body weight (254 g) observed for chicks consuming the vitamin D deficient diet in pens with filtered lights of Experiment 1 was expected. Normally, slower grth rates result in lower TD incidence and severity (Edwards, 1987; Roberson et al., 1993). In a study by Edwards et al.(1994), 16-day body weight was about 350 g compared to about 400 g when adequate vitamin D activity was provided. Once ultraviolet light was available to the chicks bodyweight tended to increase with 25- 72 (OH)D3 supplementation, but was not significantly different. Many of the earlier studies (McNutt and Haussler, 1973; Cantor and Bacon, 1978: Yarger et al., 1995) suggested that adding 25-(OH)D3 to the diet for broiler chicks improved body weight gain and feed efficiency compared to cholecalciferol. However, there were no responses observed for body weight gain with 25-(OH)D3 supplementation in any of our experiments after Experiment 1. Body weights averaged between 400 to 500 grams for l7-day old birds (Experiment 2 and 6) and 600 and 700 grams in 20-day old birds (Experiment 3, 4 and 5), which is consistent with earlier studies conducted with birds of the Ross strain that were of similar design (Rennie and Whitehead, 1996; Roberson, 1999). In Experiment 2 Ross x Arbor Acre chicks were used, but the strain difference does not seem to have affected body weight gain. Feed efficiency was restored with ultraviolet light in Experiment 1 and supplementation of 25—(OH)D3 up to 70 rig/kg in presence or absence of light did not give any beneficial results. If the diet is adequate in cholecalciferol (1100 ICU/kg ) body weight and feed efficiency will normally not respond to supplemental 25-(OH)D3 (Edwards, 1989). This was confirmed with all our experiments except for Experiment 5 which had significantly lower gain: feed at 36 ug/kg 25-(OH)D3 but a ratio was still an efficiency considered normal (0.729) for 20-day old broilers. In Experiment 1, the low body weights were also accompanied by abnormally low serum calcium (4.52 mg/dl), which largely contributed to the poor mineralization reflected in the low bone ash percentage. These chicks were severely deficient in vitamin D and as a result calcium absorption was inevitably impaired. Edwards et al.(1994) showed that chicks fed a diet with no cholecalciferol in the absence of ultraviolet light 73 also had serum calcium levels of 7.7 mg/dl compared to about 11.0 mg/dl in chicks given ultraviolet light or adequate vitamin D3. Mitchell et al. (1997a) reported increased plasma calcium with as low as 5 jig/kg cholecalciferol. Serum calcium and serum phosphorus were fairly constant across all experiments and were not affected by 25-(OH)D3 supplementation. Calcium ion concentrations in the circulating blood is necessary for blood clotting and inter-neural signal transmission and its metabolic role is vital to life and therefore extracellular calcium (ECF [Ca2*]) must be sustained. The skeleton serves as a calcium reserve from which ECF can aquire calcium during deficiency and excess calcium is simply excreted in the feces (Heaney, 2002). This is why serum calcium will not be heavily influenced by supplemental 25-(OH)D3. However, prolonged severe calcium or vitamin D deficiency will lower calcium in the blood as was observed in Experiment 1 and the result of this is reflected in the bone mass or ash content. A possible explanation for the relatively higher serum phosphorus concentrations in Experiment 1 could be that it came from the dissolution of amorphous calcium phosphate, which is found in large amounts in young bone. The amorphous calcium phosphate has lower calcium to phosphorus ratio than pure hydroxyapatite, the latter that is found more commonly in mature animals. Moreover, the TD-inducing diet is high in phosphorus relative to calcium, which possibly increased serum phosphorus. Although, the phosphorus absorption is not as efficient in the vitamin D deficient status, a low absorption of phosphorus will suppress PTH levels, signaling to the kidney to increase phosphorus reabsorption and decrease phosphate excretion. Phosphorus levels in the body are highly regulated by the renal reabsorption and excretion process, whereas calcium levels rely primarily on PTH to stimulate 1,25-(OH)2D3 production from 25- 74 (OH)D3 and less on renal reabsorption and excretion (it is presumed that 99% of all filtered calcium is automatically absorbed by the kidney (Deluca 1982)). The latter metabolite, which is probably already present in very low concentrations in the pool due to the vitamin D deficient status inevitably, limits 1,25-(OH)2D3 production and subsequently its participation in improving intestinal absorption of either mineral. Despite the large amount of new information that has been published on TD during the past decade the etiology of TD is still not clear. The implications of feeding different metabolites of cholecalciferol such as 25-(OH)D3 have been the most identifiable solutions in combating the TD lesions. The responses observed with 25- (OH)D3 on TD deve10pment in our study and earlier nutritional studies are variable. Studies on other suggested beneficial effects of dietary 25-(OH)D3 such as growth stimulation have also been inconsistent, but to a lesser extent, and appears to be affected by age, strain and genetics. The role of 25-(OH)D3 in phosphorus utilization has also received more attention in recent years and a relationship between 25-(OH)D3 and phytate degradation has been established although the mechanism in achieving this is also unclear. There is evidence that shows that 1,25-(OH)zD3 is a more superior metabolite in preventing TD (Edwards, 1989, 1990; Rennie et al., 1993) and increasing phytate phosphorus retention (Edwards, 1993) in broiler chicks. The advantage of 1,25-(OI-D3D3 is its ability to interact with receptors at target tissues which is due to its hydroxylation at position 1 on its carbon skeleton. The 1,25-(OH)3D3 metabolite binds to the VDR with high affinity and specificity. The 25-(OH)D3 metabolite is only able to compete for the receptor when concentrations are three-fold that of 1,25-(OH)2D3 (Soares, 1995). The 75 potency of 1,25-(OH)2D3 allows for a very small margin of safety from toxicity which is why the commercial use of 1,25-(OH)2D3 is tightly regulated. 76 CHAPTER 3 SUMMARY, CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATION Skeletal deformities and leg weakness have become one of the major problems to the poultry industry. Skeletal problems likely cause the broiler industry close to 120 million and the turkey industry 40 million dollars in losses every year (Sullivan, 1994). Tibial dyschondrOplasia (TD) is a common skeletal abnormality found in young rapidly growing meat-type poultry (ducks, broiler chickens and turkeys) and is influenced by nutrition as well as genetics (Riddel, 1981; Edwards, 1984). Feeding 25-(OH)D3 provides growth stimulation in addition to TD prevention and the metabolite can improve phosphorus utilization in broiler chicks. The objective of this study was to study the effects of 25-hydroxycholcalciferol on the incidence and severity of TD and phosphorus utilization in broiler chicks and to estimate the level needed to reduce TD and improve phosphorus utilization when chicks are fed a normal broiler diet. Based on the previous studies we hypothesized that dietary supplementation of 25-(OH)D3 will reduce the incidence of TD in broilers at a lower level than the manufacturer’s recommendations of 69 rig/kg regardless of whether the birds are fed a normal broiler diet or TD inducing diet. In conclusion, the low TD incidence observed with 25-(OH)D3 supplementation in our studies is partly contributed by the type of broiler strain that was used. The dietary calcium concentration of about 0.90% seems to be a threshold level for Ross x Ross chicks in our studies, a point at which TD incidence will not be reduced with any level of 25-(OH)D3 supplementation. This threshold appears to be different in other meat-type 77 strains. The addition of 40 to 70 jig/kg clearly reduced and minimized TD when birds were affected by a low or marginal calcium diet. Lower level of 25-(OH)D3 is much more effective when calcium is deficient (TD-inducing). Supplementation with 25-(OH)D3 does not seem to improve performance in normal starter or grower broiler diets. Lower levels of 25-(OH)D3 can increase phytate phosphorus in broiler starter diets. The inclusion of 25-(OH)D3 in the grower diet appears beneficial as it improved phytate phosphorus retention. Supplementation of 25-(OH)D3 to normal starter and grower diets may have important practical effects in the commercial poultry industry as it can increase phosphorus utilization. The 25-(OH)D3 metabolite increases phytate phosphorus retention in the gut of the birds. Excessive levels of phosphorus in the manure is of great environmental concern in areas of intensive animal agriculture production which poultry growers and integrators are faced with. The majority of the producers in the commercial poultry industry who supplement 25-(OH)D3 in their operations remove it from the diets in the grower phase (personal communication, Marty Allison, 2002). This is likely due to a cost factor as the price per pound (lb) per ton of feed (69ug) of 25-(OH)D3 is $1.65. The inclusion of 25-(OH)D3 in the grower diet may potentially reduce some of the excessive phosphorus that is excreted in the manure. In addition, with regards to 25- (OH)D3 supplementation and TD prevention, Ross birds fed 0.90-1.0% Ca do not appear to need Hy—D to prevent TD, but may be important for bone health for companies formulating at 0.85%. 78 Table 2. Summary of Experiments Experiment 1 Group 1 Diet UV-Light 25-(OH)D3 Cholecalciferol (ug) (ICU) 1 1 No 0 0 2 1 Yes 0 0 3 2 No 10 0 4 2 Yes 10 0 5 3 N o 70 0 6 3 Yes 70 0 Experiment 2 Group 1 Diet UV-Light 25-(OH)D3 Cholecalciferol (ug) (ICU) 1 1 No 0 1 100 2 2 No 10 1 100 3 3 No 40 1 100 4 4 No 70 1 100 Experiment 3 Group 1 Diet UV-Light 25-(OH)D3 Cholecalciferol (ug) (ICU) 1 1 No 0 2200 2 2 No 10 2200 3 3 N0 40 2200 4 4 No 70 2200 Experiment 4 Group 1 Diet UV-Light 25-(OH)D3 Cholecalciferol (ug) (ICU) 1 1 No 0 2200 2 2 No 18 2200 3 3 No 36 2200 4 4 No 54 2200 5 5 No 72 2200 6 6 N 0 90 2200 79 Table 3. Summary of Experiments Experiment 5 Group 1 Diet UV-Light 25-(OH)D3 Cholecalciferol (ug) (ICU) l 1 No 0 2200 2 2 No 18 2200 3 3 No 36 2200 4 4 No 54 2200 5 5 No 72 2200 6 6 No 90 2200 Experiment 6 Phase 1 Group 1 Diet UV-Light 25-(OH)D3 Cholecalciferol Starter (ug) (ICU) 1 1 No 0 2200 2 No 40 2200 Experiment 6 Phase 2 Group 1 Diet UV-Light 25-(OH)D3 Cholecalciferol Grower (ug) (ICU) 1 1 No 0 2200 2 No 40 2200 3 3 No 0 2200 80 .5553... :28 5.23 £31638. .3 .o e o. c2388 33: .252 .6 .6sz 3:235sz 2:329: 33 .6 t. e I I I I I I I <2 910.» = e EoEtomxm I I I I I I | I <2 cm I | I I I I | I $2 an I I I I I I I I <2 Vm m EoEtomxm I I I I I I I I (.2 cm I I I I I I 3 I (.2 w _ I I I I I I I I <2 co | I I I | I I I <2 an I I I I I I I I <2 Vm v EoEtomxm e I I I I I I I 32 cm I I I I I I I I <32 m . I 3 3 I I I I I $2 on e I I I I I I I $2 9. m EoEComxm e I I I I I I I (\z o. e 33 33 e I I I I (.2 on e 33 3 e I I I I <32 3. N .5859an | 3 3 e I I I I $2 0. a 3 3 e I e e t a; E e 3 3 Z. 3 e e t. e: on a 3 3 a 3 e a a a. 2 . Hangman. e I I e 3 e e .3 e: o _ a I I a I e e e. a; o 53.53.. 522.8 3.529.: :3. m «U .50..— EwEB Em: Awe—BE 33.x. a... a... 2...: 5.20m EEom EEG 25m .>: «aw—OYmN 29.2.3 3 3.3.5.8 31.3.. he i.e.—5.5m .v 039—. 81 Figure. 4. Effects of dietary 25-(OH)D3 with or without UV-light on 16-day body weight. (Experiment 1). Body weight (g) 450 - ,’ - -A- -Filter 400 " I 3' +UV- I, light 350 7 '1 300 r ,' 250 200 . i 0 10 70 25(OH)D3 (uglkg) 82 Figure 5. Effects of dietary 25-(OH)D3 with or without UV-light on rickets incidence at 16 days of age (Experiment 1). Rickets incidence (% ) 100 1 90 ~ \ - -k - Filter + UV- light 25-(OI'DD3 (ug/kg) 83 Figure 6. Effects of dietary 25-(OH)D3 with or without UV-light on TD incidence at 16 days of age (Experiment 1). TD incidence (”M 70 ~ - -k - Filter 0 i i 0 10 70 25(OH)D3 (Hg/kg) 84 Figure 7. Effects of dietary 25-(OH)D3 with or without UV-light on TD severity (N3%) at 16 days of age (Experiment 1). 'ID severity (% N3) 40 10 -10 254011le (“g/kg) 85 Figure 8. Effects of dietary 25-(OH)D3 on TD incidence at 17 days of age (Experiment 2). TD incidence (‘70) . 90 - 73%| a I 70 - l 50 3 26%| 30 b T i 5%I 2%| 10 ' ‘ c f . . . FT” 0 10 40 70 -10 25(OH)D3 (“g/kg) 86 Figure 9. Effects of dietary 25-(OH)D3 on TD severity (%N3) at 17 days of age (Experiment 2). TD severity (% N3) 80 _ 59% l 70 - a - T 60 .l. 50 - 40 I l 30 - 16%| b 20 -I I 27 ’ ”‘1' 3 o 10 - * c Oil c 0 I‘LL—I T l I l I 0 10 40 70 -10 25(OH)D3 (ug/kg) 87 Figure 10. Effects of dietary 25-(OH)D3 on % phytate phosphorus (PP) retention at 17 days of age (Experiment 2). % PP retention 90 80 ~ 54.7% 70 - __I 46.47 a 60 - _.”_I 39.6% I 3., T .I. so I 30 90/ I be I 40 — ' a T c .I. so — I m - 10 - 0 . . . o 10 40 7o -1 r 0 25-(0H)D. (mg/kg) 88 Figure 11. Effects of dietary 25-(OH)D3 on TD incidence at 20 days of age (Experiment 3). TD incidence (%l 70 60- 50 « 40- 25%, ‘ 21%| 3 30 ‘ ‘l' a _ I» I :1 20 . 1 i ab 10 - I 0 . . . I 0 10 40 70 '10 25—-(0H)1)3_(ug/kg)' 89 Figure 12. Effects of dietary 25-(OH)D3 on TD severity (%N3) at 20 days of age (Experiment 3). TD severity (% N3) 60 50 . 40 < 30 - 13%| 20 ~ a 8% I 8% | I ah ab 07 10 ~ - l T T ° 1 1 b 0 I I I ‘1': 0 10 40 70 -10 25(OH)D3 (ug/kg) 90 Figure 13. Effects of dietary 25-(OH)D3 on % phytate phosphorus retention (PP) at 20 days of age (Experiment 3). % PP retention 90 so - 70 - 46% < 60 ‘ __I 43.1% | 50 - 34.3% I a a 1' . 342%| 40 - b 1 r b l 30 - I 20 - ' I 10 ~ 0 I I T 0 10 4o 70 .10 25(OH)D3 (“g/kg) 91 Figure 14. Effects of dietary 25-(OH)D3 on TD incidence at 20 days of age (Experiment 4). TD incidence (%) 60 50 — 40 ' 30‘ zo-El‘fl 10 ‘ I I 0 18 36 '10 25-(0H)D3(ug/kg) 92 Figure 16. Effects of dietary 25-(OH)D3 on TD incidence at 20 days of age (Experiment 5). TD incidence (% ) 50- 40- 22% I . 30 - 18% I 15%| ’ 20- I 10%| 8% I 10- ~ W! I 12% +——‘: ~—-—« I 0 r . . I 0 18 36 54 72 9o -10 25(OH)D3 (“g/kg) 93 Figure 17. Effects of dietary 25(OH)D3 on TD incidence at 17 days of age (Experiment 6, Phase I). TD incidence (% ) 50~ 401 30* 12% 12% L |_ 20‘ 10‘ -10 25-(OH)D3 (ug/kg) 94 Figure 18. Effects of dietary 25-(OH)D3 on % phytate phosphorus retention at 35 days of age (Experiment 6, Phase II). % PP t ti re err on 80 70 a 60 - ' 47.1%I 43.0%I a 42.7%I 50 r b i b i E 40 - 30 . 20 . 10 i 0 i i 0.0 40-40 40-0 -10 25(OH)D3 (ug/kg) 95 Table 5. Effects of ultraviolet light and 25-hydroxycholecalciferol on performance, serum calcium and phosphorus, and phytate phosphorus retention in l6-day Ross X Ross broiler chicks fed a Vitamin D3 deficient diet, Experiment 1 Serum Treatments Concentrations 17-d Phytate P 25-(OH)D3 UV light BW Gainzfeed Calcium Phosphorus Retention (Mg/kg) ( g ) -— mg/dl (%) 0 no 254c 0.545“ 4.52“ 9.07“ 32.9“ 0 yes 469“ 0.680“ 8.23“ 7.88“ 56.4“ 10 no 475“ 0.696“ 8.26“ 7.92“ 58.0“ 10 yes 510“b 0.673“ 8.86“ 7.75“ 60.5“ 70 no 562“ 0.711“ 8.00“ 7.61“ 53.2“ 70 yes 526““ 0.713“ 7.94“ 8.56““ 51.6“ x 466 0.670 7.64 8.13 52.1 Pooled SE 19 0.019 0.93 0.86 3.1 Main effect means 25-(OH)D3 0 361c 0.613“ 6.37“ 8.47 44.6“ 10 492“ 0.684“ 8.52“ 7.85 59.3“ 70 544“ 0.712“ 6.97““ 7.14 52.4““ Light No 430“ 0.650“ 6.26“ 7.56 48.0“ yes 502“ 0.689“ 8.30“ 8.09 56.2“ ANOVA Source of Variation Probabilities 25-(OH)D3 <0.001 <0.001 0.095 0.319 0.013 Light <0.001 0.027 0.016 0.496 0.034 25-(OH)D3 x Light <0.001 <0.001 0.133 0.077 0.021 Regression of 25-(OH) Linear 0.002 0.008 0.870 0.181 0.598 Quadratic 0.014 0.076 0.065 0.634 0.030 N Means in a column with no common superscript differ significantly (P<.05) 96 Table 6. Effects of ultraviolet light and 25-hydroxycholecalciferol on rickets incidence, development of tibial dyschondroplasia and percentage bone ash in 16- day Ross X Ross broiler chicks fed a Vitamin D3 deficient diet, Experiment 1. Treatments Rickets Tibial Dyschondroplasia Severity Severity 25-(OH)D3 UV light RI Incidence Score 1 Score 2 N3 Bone ash (Hg/kg) (%) (%) (%) (%) 0 no 93“ 58“ 2.19““ 1.28“ 23““ 25.2“1 0 yes 13“ 42“ 1.96“b 0.78“ 12“c 41.6° 10 no 12“ 56“ 2.39“ 1.33“ 30“ 41.2“c 10 yes 0“ 15“ 1.75““ 0.23c 0“ 42.5““ 70 no 0b 15“ 1.38“c 0.20“ 0c 43.1“ 70 yes 0“ 7“ 0.75c 0.07c 0c 42.4““ Y 20 32 1.74 0.65 11 39.3 Pooled SE 4 6 0.29 0.17 5 0.5 Main effects means 25-(OH)D3 0 53“ 50“ 2.07“ 1.03“ 18“ 33“ 10 6“ 36“ 2.07“ 0.78“ 15“ 42“ 70 0“ 11c 1.06“ 0.14“ 0“ 42“ Light yes 35“ 43“ 1.98 0.94“ 18“ 36“ no 4“ 21“ 1.49 0.36“ 4“ 42“ ANOVA Source of Variation df Probabilities 25-(OH)D3 2 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 0.003 <0.001 Light <0.001 <0.001 0.054 <0.001 0.002 <0.001 25-(OH)D3 x Light 2 <0.001 0.031 0.737 0.028 0.017 <0.001 Linear 0.016 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 0.005 0.019 Quadratic 0.008 0.463 0.313 0.858 0.771 0.006 “1 Means in a column with no common superscript differ significantly (P<.05) 97 8:32; .3 £3.98 05 Eat :82. AmoVn—v bucaocmcwfi 3&6 “£8283 5888 8 5:5 5:38 a E mama—2 9. 32 $3 weed 39¢ 89o 6:888 39$ 33 RS 83 63 see: :5? 32 82 and 83 559-? mus—ENDEQ £033.33? mo ocuzom mm ”2 moo mad 2 mm Boom ed. :s an: 83 m? m a; one 2.8 wood was E eves owe _ _.: Need out 3 29% see 8S R2 5 E 3.3 _E 3.2 SE 2e o 3 =38 3 V 933 _eoeeaom a 893m _maoeeeoi _easeo _eooaseo 3m Saga .9: 953830250 $208329 838m .N 235:9me Jog 2.33%.. an 553; a 68 9329 5:8: «23‘ sea—.5. X 36¢ ems—Y: 5 55:39. 33:98:: 35:.— ES £32325.— ES 8323 5.23. 6955.823 .8 3.5.3232:aozxcuemsimm .8 38.5— .b 033—. 98 0:08.098 .3 0:0 0... .0 00588.0 0.2.: 3 .085: .03. >328. 0.050. m .0300 025 .3 0:83: .03.... .m o. c ES. 0300 .20 5.3 0.0:... 3 0038:: .03. 32. :0: O... 5.3 .0038 00:5 3 0095:: .03....“ :0: :0: OF 5.3 .0038 0.0:... 3 52:5: .0305... .3 b.:0>0m 33020:. 5.3 30803:. 0:: :0: :0: m o. o :8... 3&5: 00300. .03...N 005:? .3 0.3.0:: 0... E2. 50.2. $on. 33005:»? 3...: 2.1000095 38:80 0: 5.3 5:28 0 :. 0:00.). 6.. mam... .oodv .oo.ov no . .o .oodv 0.08.0090 .oodV .oodv .oo.ov .ocdv .oodV 30:... 53v 53v 32v 53v 53v 659.: 00.3.5035 3.83; 3 00::om m... N no... .3. 0 mm .0039. .43V 0. on... hm. R .m 3.? 6.. one... emmd om on em? om oood owed om ov emdv no. ewe... eomd eom o. e... .v 3m emoN BEN emu o 2... 1x; 3.. .0033 .20: 8.5 e030m mm 030m N. 030m .8528. 59.9-3 m 8:822 b.:0>0m b..0>0m 0.0:.Qo:.0:o..00..m .05.... 0:08.08... .N 0:05.033. .00... 30.2.3.0 an 583; a .00.. 5.02.0 00.3.5 m0u0< as}: x 0.03. mac-..— 5 :00 0:2. $550009 .05. 0.00.33350m6 .03: .3 b.0050 1:: 00:01.0... :0 3.3.3.00035.3.2.3273 .3 300...... .w 030% 99 030...; 3 «.9230 0... 30.. 3.05.. Gav... b38336 3...... 3330...... 33.30 0: 5.3 3:30 0 :. 3003. e. 83v :2 .20 $3 5.0 2.836 3.. was 3:. .8... 80.0 325 53v 8.... 8:. 33 23 5.3.-.. meg—3:30.... comumtmxr .«o 00.50m 8.. N... S... :3 m. mm 8.8. v... 0: 8.: :3 3 m .2. z; 3...: E: a. E .3. 8.. 3.. E... :0 S 3.8 S. .3: an; :0 o. .3. 8.. .2: 83 3 c 3 35 .m V .03 3.30.3. _A. 0.0%.... .3333... 33.0.00 1000.330 3m. 53.9-3 .3. 30.3.3830 030330.... 380m .m 303.39... ..0... .0250. 3.3.... 333: a :0.— 30...0 3.3.... 00.3. X 03”. 3.73 :. 3.30.0. 33.33.... 033.... :3 £52.32... .03 .5330 3.9.0.. $0333.39 3 3..0...0.:003..0>3..3.7mm .3 300...... .a 0.3... 100 535393 .6 9:3 29 3 935583 :999 Mo 3955: .58 5:28. 3333 m 9038 899 («o 395:: .58; .3: 3: m 9 o :89 958 Q: 993 «999 no 39:5: 9:8 Eu: 3: 0:. £95 9338 :999 Mo 3955: .88..” :3: 3: OF £95 928: «999 no 39:5: .8859 mo £33m w:_m:o3:_ 9.95 938335 9:: :3: 3: m S c :59 9&5: 3.58 .98: 3059.3 ho £922: 29 509 :82. Amova: £53533 3&6 598393 :0558 o: 993 5:28 : :_ 8:22 3 £2 33 :3 SS 8:: 0:885 93.9 ~:ood Sodv :36 89.9 33:5 93.9 Sod Sod :96 :89 559.3 3:59:92: 59:93» :0 850m 3.: m de ind m mm 9200: N? N. 900 #5.— 99 um 03 no :86 goo; an on 9m: aw ammd «and :2 9» ed: gm «36 2:59 .8 o— Ndv am _ «and “SN “mm o A .x. V A .x; A: V 9:3 .99: o:om macaw mm 2on N9 Boom ~33935 559-3 m 39:5 Z €3>om m93>om 333895539 9:99P M 3:25:29 1" .M «EOETOQNH Jam—u her-flaw h0=¢h£ .wEhOE 8 60h alums—O tawny:— mmcflm x anM— hafinGN :_ 9:: «:99 $3593: 9:: 3338959939 .39: a: .3935: 9:: 35935 :: 33:233.:guhxca9h9-m~ u: 83:”.— .3 0.9:. 101 85...? Mo $99.5: 3.9 :39 :32. Gav... 95:05:!» 3.9.9 5:835... 3:53.. o: .99: ::5_oo : :_ 2:32 .3 102 2...... E... :8... 5V... :3... 2.8.55 :3... 2.... OR... :8... E... :25 2...... .R... an... 3...... m8... 59.9-2 mug—5.30.:— comwwmwa/ mo oogom n. m... a... 2.... R mm 8.8.. .3 3... an... 8:... E m 2.3.. a: 3... 3... 2K .5 .96.. mm: on... 2:... a: S 9.9. 3... S... 8:. m3 3 .2: 2.... 5.... mac... .3 cm .35. 3.. 0...... 8:... a m. .2... E: 8.... .2... N8 .. .x. :38 .m . 3...»... .5953. .. 23:... 9238.... .8328 9833.. x a: 5.3.3 9-..: msofimbcooconv mucugwouh. :53m Al I 1" I {I I! .v 93:93....H £29 32:... 3:29 553: : 93.— 8-399 39...:— amcm N 83— 39-3 5 3333.. 2.3.3.39.— 853: 9:: $539.98...— 9:: E:_u_:u :53... 69:55.83.— :.. 9.3.9233...9958:9513 .3 33.9.:— .= 3.9a. ..:o.:.8:.8 :o 9:0 2.. 8 985888 3.... :0 89:5: .8... 3.5.8. 885$ m 9208 8:... b... 8.95.: 9::...v .:o: 8: m o. o EB... 28: .8: 5.3 «9:... :o 898:: .82 \:o: .8: G... 5.3 98.88 8...: :0 89:5: 8......n :8: 8: D... 5.3 928... m2... :0 895.: .885... :o $.88... m:.mao.8:. 5.3 98:98:. 9:: :o: .8: m 3 o EB: 98w::.. 8.88 3......N 885...? :o £9.98: 29 :5... :83: E. .o Now... 2.5... wmad m . s... 09.39.30 m3... mom... 9::... New... SK... 88:... 2...... ”mm... a... E... .5... 550.8 89:539.: 5.89.; :o 8.30m hm... m 2... mod m mm 98.8: v.3 : a... hm. : I... hm: m cm... ooN o. o: in.» m mm... mm. m. N: 9.9. m :2. m... m .8 v.2. m 36 mm. m 9m 9m: c we... mud m x. ..m: o. mm... mm. m. o .x . t... t... .33... .5: gem. ~2on mm Boom .. Boom .8532. MQAEOYmN m 88:52 b.8>om b..8>om «.m:.:o.9:o..om>Q 9.5a. .v .:o:_..8:xm 8.9 .823» 8.8.... 92:8: : 98.. 58...: 8.....5 8.3. x 23. 39-3 :. .8: 8:2. 89359.8: 9:: «.m:.::._9:2.omm9 9...... a: 5.85: 9:: 3598:. :: ....8...:.:3.2.9?:..9.3-3 .: Scuba .2 93:8 103 853$ .8 £3.28 2: E2. :82. Gov“: bucaoficwa 8&8 8:09.33 85an o: 53 5:28 a E 882 e. 82 83 88 ES and £320 :2 R2 2:5 985 $3 38: 82 was 2% was 82 859-2 mug—Banohm coflmtmx/ mo wousom 2 a; :3 :3 mm mm 838 SW .2 was $2 :6 m 9% 8s NE: at: :6 8 1% of 3a ES So 9 2m NE NE: “S; g E a: a; who as: ”E 3 3m 8s 9; 38¢ MS 2 gm 2: a; page as o g Ewe 3 V 383 823% a gab: _maofimoé .5226 _Beaso 25 659-2 .33 88588880 35.58; 820m .m Eofitoaum .83 .825» 8:9:— _aE.8= a 3.. $.qu 8.8.5 9.3— x 28m >373 E 83:30.. 22238:.— 8532 can Jae—Eng; 6:: 532.8 :58» .3558qu .8 8839.39.28.»on131mm.8 38am .2 033—. 104 888838 8 8:8 85 8 8:888 8:8 8 838:: _82 5:28— o8>omV m .888 8:8 8 88:8: .88.: n .m 8 AV ES... 888 8: :85 8:8 8 828:: .82 Eu: 8: OH 5:: 888 8:8 8 888:: 88.: N .8: 8: DH .23 888 8:8 8 838:: 325,—. 8 £88,: 88885 £3 8888:_ 8:: 8: 8: m 9 AV Eat .888 .888 38%. .AchmV 388588 8%38883 88:80 0: 5; 5:38 a E 882 e. Emd mmmd vmmd wand m 38 38880 EN: :26 Rod momd momd 88:5 9:6 $06 :43 mmmd bond MQEOYmN 8:23:85 .888; 8 888m mad m :6 8.0 0 mm 888m 5.? v omd $2 3 M and: 5 Rd 2: S cm €58 m 36 ea; M: NA. 2%.? N 26 mu; m wm «New m AVNAV end A: on :03 m mmd we; 2 :2 pm? m mmd mo; mm AV A _x. V A .x. V A _x. V 8:an E8 88m M888m NN 880m 2 880m _88885 559.3 m 88:: Z 388m bco>om 388888889 883 888:8; .m .:o=._.8axm .88 8.88. 8.8.5 858: : A8,. 9.ch 8.8.5 83— X 98¢ 88.3 :_ :8 2:5 «wag—898: 8:: 383888898 83: 8 3:98... 1:: 3:88.: :: 88:238—288....8.3-3 8 38am .1 03:8 105 8:553 .8 89.38:: 2: So... .359 3:553 .8 538:: 2.. 82.. 58.). _ :2 $2 38 659-2 moat—5.30.5 comamamxr mo oohsom M: 88 : mm 8.8: m. 3 Ed .8 M :8 $8 8% 8 .588 :9 Ed 8m 8 crew A..\..V A m V A983 8820: .3888 3: 559-8 1 29:: .3. mycoeumofit 1' 8 88:...8axm .8... 8.88 8.8.5 .888: a .8. 9.8.8 8.8.5 9.3. X 98¢ .88.... :. 83:88.. 88.88:: 83.9... 8:: 65.8.1.8...— ::a 8.8.8 5:8,. 68:88.8: :: 8.8.8.888:u»88§.-m~ .8 vacuum— .m. 8.88 106 2089.898 mo 9:0 09: 9: 90:98.88 2:99 .9: 89:5: .88 >828. 226$ m 9088 «:99 mo 89:5: .80.: n .m 3 o :5: Boom >5 993 $99 .9: 89:5: _89 Eu: :0: OH 993 928m 899 no 39:5: .30... e do: an A: 993 90.58 .699 a: 39:5: 385% no 5:38 9.68.85 993 908805 9:: :29 :0: m 9 c :89 cows: meoom .899 n .oo::_._:> mo max—:5 05 Eat 2mm N .oo::t:> .9: 933:: 09: :59 :82 _ .Amonv bEmoE:w_m 8.9.99 E98233 :2:an o: 993 5:28 a :_ 3:22 9.. $3 $2 83 32 32 M9:5va 8:999:98: 59:93:» no 850m Nd m wed 36 m mm :28: ca: v mmd mm; B M. Em: m vmd a: N9 ow 859m New m mmd w: 2 c Btfim A .x. v A .x. v A .x. v A393 .93 2:5 W28m em 28m «— eoom .85965 559.3 m 898: Z 382% bigom «_m:_ao:::09om>n_ 399.: 3:089:89 .9 «5:93.95— Jozv .828» 3:29 35.8: a 90.— 395: 3:39 36% X 3.3— mac.: .9 9:: 0:99 oust—8:2— .E: «9::—:295983 1999:: 32:8 9:: con—020:9 :c _ouozzaoo—cfihxcémfmn a: magnum .3 29:? 107 838388 :9 9:3 39: 3 938883 :89 .8 398:: .88 \Am88_83 mo. 338$ m 988.: 8:9 .3 398:: .80... v .8: 3: 835.83 mm. 993 9338 8:9 :9 3985: 38:85.83 8. :0 833m 8383:: 993 93838 9:: 8: 3: m 2 o 89: 98:8 838 .88. n .8888 .3 28:8: 39. 89: 2mm N .8888 .8 £998: 39. 88: :82 _ .Amo.v:v 9:88:88.“ 3.9.:9 8:83:83 8888 9: 9:3 :838 a 8 882 a-.. cad mmad 5:: wood 999.9 9de 53:09-3 8:93:98: . 8:88; :0 8.59m N. mad : fio Sod cm mm 928: 9_ 8.: m9 mi. 29.9 mm: .m m: 3.: hm and: _N9.o mom: 3380 9-99 388m 3 v: :9 L89 59.9 new: 3380 99.9. 388m M: 3.: mm nod: «N99 :9: 338D o-o 388m A5 A89 A8 A w 9 A383 v88m M88m .88935 8:83: _98:8:O 3m 559.3 M 39852 >938m _: 88:9: _9-mm 88:83 me: 88888:. .9 «88:39:: 8:9 339% 3:89 :83: a 93: 8.89: 3:89 83— x 83— 89-3 8 835.83.8— :: .3933: 9:: 8.3938 9:: 8:83.. 8:99:89: 88:9: 6:39:89: 9:: 853.8 888 6:88:83: :: 83:283.99:89:93.3 .8 88.5— .: 29:8 108 838.3:3 3 9:3 38 :3 938833 «989 3 398:: .88 >888. 3333: m 9333.... 39:9 :3 398:: .33..- n .m 8 9 88: 883 83 993 3999 .3 398:: .88 >3: 3: Q:- 9:.3 9883 39:9 .3 39:5: .33... v :3: 3: Q... 993 9883 39.99 .3 398:: .3395... .3 3.333 98383:. 993 93383:. 9:3 :3: 3: m 89 88: 9388 8:83 .33... n 3883:: :3 3.3.3:: 39: 88: 2mm N 33:39:; .3 3.8.3:: 39. 88: :83. _ 33.: was 8.3 w. w, 83: 82 589-3 88:93.98: :o:3.3> :3 3839 m9 v 99.9 9.9 :3 mm 93.8: Wm: N 99.9 3.19 m M v.3 9 9 9 9 3380 9-9: 388m 9.? :. NN.9 95.9 \- 3380 9v-9v 3889 1m: 9 9 9 9 3380 9-9 3:89 A .x. 9 A .x. V A .x. 9 A333 .933 38m :88m «m 889 M. 88m .8888: 5509-2 M 39852 3.33% 83>3m 33338989338. .89.... 88838:. .9 3:883:5— 389 338» 3:89 38.3: 3 93: 9.893 3:89 333— N 333: 89-99 8 93: 3:39 38:83: 9:: 83338939339 .89.: .3 3:33». 9:: 33:39.38 :3 33:883—833..9::-mm .3 333:”: .9— 3.93:. 109 REFERENCES Aburto, A., and W. M. Britton. 1998. Effects of different levels of vitamins A and E on the utilization of cholecalciferol by broiler chickens. Poult. Sci. 77:570-577. Angel, R., A. S. Dhandu, T. J. Applegate, and M. Christman. 2001. Phosphorus sparing effect of phytase, 25-hydroxycholecalciferol, and citric acid when fed to broiler chicks. Poult. Sci. 80(Supp1. 1):134. (Abstr.) Applegate, T. J., R. Angel, H. L. Classen, R. W. Newkirk, and D. D. Maenz. 2000. Effect of dietary calcium concentration and 25-hydroxycholecalciferol on phytate hydrolysis and intestinal phytase activity in broilers. Poult. Sci. 79(Suppl. 1):21. (Abstr.) Association of Official Analytical Chemists,l984. Official methods of analysis. Assn. Offic. Anal. Chemists, Washington, DC. Bar, A., M. Sharvit, D. Noff, S. Edelstein, and S. Hurwitz. 1980. Absorption and excretion of cholecalciferol and of 25- hydroxycholecalciferol and metabolites in birds. J. Nutr. 110:1930-1934. Blunt, J. W., Y. Tanaka, and H. F. DeLuca. 1968. The biological activity of 25- hydroxycholecalciferol, a metabolite of vitamin D3. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 61:714-718. Boris, A. 1977. Relative activities of some metabolites and analogs of cholecalciferol in stimulation of tibia ash weight in chicks otherwise deprived of vitamin D. J. Nutr. 107: 194- 198. Burton, R., A. Sheridan, and C. Howlett. 1981. The incidence and importance of tibial dyschondroplasia to the commercial broiler on industry in Australia. Br. Poult. Sci. 22:153-160. Calabotta, D. F. 1997. Use of 25-(OI-DD3 may improve bird performance. Feedstuffs. 69: 1 1-14. Cantor, A., and W. Bacon. 1978. Performance of caged broilers fed vitamin D3 and 25- OH vitamin D3. Poult. Sci. 57:1123-1124. 110 Clinical Application of Atomic Absorption Emission Spectroscopy. 1972. The IL Application Laboratory. Lexington, MA. Deluca, H. 1982. Metabolism and molecular mechanism of action of vitamin D. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 10:147-158. Edwards, H. M. 1985. Effects of different soybean meal on the incidence of tibial dyschondroplasia. J. Nutr. 115: 1005-1015. Edwards, H. M. 1995. Efficacy of several vitamin D compounds in increasing phytate phosphorus utilization in chickens. Poult. Sci. 74(Suppl. 1):107. (Abstr.) Edwards, H. M. 1999. Responses to vitamin D3 metabolites tend to vary. Feedstuffs 71: 14-15. Edwards, H. M., and M. B. Gillis. 1959. A Chromic oxide balance method for determining phosphate availability. Poult. Sci. 38:569-574. Edwards, H. M., Jr. 1984. Studies on the etiology of tibial dyschondroplasia in chickens. J. Nutr. 114:1001-1013. Edwards, H. M., Jr. 1989. The effect of dietary cholecalciferol, 25- hydroxycholecalciferol and 1,25-dihydroxycholecalciferol on the development of tibial dyschondroplasia in broiler chickens in the absence and presence of disulfiram. J. Nutr. 119:647-652. Edwards, H. M., Jr. 1990. Efficacy of several vitamin D compounds in the prevention of tibial dyschondroplasia in broiler chickens. J. Nutr. 120:1054-1061. Edwards, H. M., Jr., M. A. Elliot, S. Sooncharernying, and W. M. Britton. 1994. Quantitative requirement for cholecalciferol in the absence of ultraviolet light. Poult. Sci. 73:288-294. Elliot, M. A., and H. M. Edwards, Jr. 1994. Effect of genetic strain, calcium, and feed withdrawal on growth, tibial dyschondroplasia, plasma 1,25- dihydroxycholecalciferol, and plasma 25-hydroxycholecalciferol in sixteen-day- old chickens. Poult. Sci. 73:509-519. 111 Elliot, M. A., and H. M. Edwards, Jr. 1997. Effect of 1,25-dihydroxycholecalciferol, cholecalciferol, and fluorescent lights on the development of tibial dyschondroplasia and rickets in broiler chickens. Poult. Sci. 76:570-5 80. Goldenberg, H., and A. Fernandez. 1966. Simplified method for the estimation of inorganic phosphorus in body fluids. Clin. Chem. 12:871-882. Gomori, G. 1942. A modification of the colorimetric phosphorus determination for use with photoelectric colorimeter. J. Clin. Lab. Med. 27:955-960. Groff, J ., and S. Gropper. 2000. Fat soluble vitamins. Pages 316-370 in Advanced nutrition and human metabolism. Marshall, P, Belmont, CA. Haddad, J. G., Jr., and J. Walgate. 1976. 25-hydroxyvitamin D transport in human plasma. Isolation and partial characterization of calcifidiol-binding protein. J. Biol. Chem. 251:4803-4809. Heaney, R. P. 2002. Ethnicity, bone status, and the calcium requirement. Nutr. Res. 22: 153-178. Holick, M. F. 1981. The cutaneous photosynthesis of previtamin D3: A unique photoendocrine system. J. Invest. Dermatol. 77:51-58. Latta, M., and M. Eskin. 1980. Phytate phosphorus determination. J. Agric. Food Chem. 28:1313—1315. Leach, R., Jr., and M. Neisheim. 1965. Nutritional, genetic and morphological studies of an abnormal cartilage formation in young chicks. J. Nutr. 86:236-244. Leach, R. M., and M. Lilbum. 1992. Current knowledge on the etiology of tibial dyschondroplasia in the avian species. Poult. Sci. Rev. 4:57-65. Lewis, P. D., and M. T. R. 1998. Responses of domestic poultry to various light sources. World's Poult. Sci. J. 54:7-25. Lofton, J. T., and J. H. Soares, Jr. 1986. The effects of vitamin D3 on leg abnormalities in broilers. Poult. Sci. 65:749-756. 112 McNutt, K., and M. Haussler. 1973. Nutritional effectiveness of 1,25- dihydroxycholecalciferol in preventing rickets in chicks. J. Nutr. 103:681-689. Mitchell, R. D., H. M. Edwards, Jr., and G. R. McDaniel. 1997. The effects of ultraviolet light and cholecalciferol and its metabolites on the development of leg abnormalities in chickens genetically-selected for a high and low incidence of tibial dyschondroplasia. Poult. Sci. 76:346-354. Mohammed, A., M. J. Gibney, and T. G. Taylor. 1991. The effects of dietary levels of inorganic phosphorus, calcium and cholecalciferol on the digestibility of phytate- P by the chick. Br. J. Nutr. 662251-259. Moorehead, W. R., and H. G. Biggs. 1974. 2-arnino-2-methyl-1-propanol as the alkalizing agent in an improved continuous-flow cresolphthalein complexone procedure for calcium in serum. Clin. Chem. 20:1458-1460. Nelson, T. S., and L. K. Kirby. 1987. The calcium binding properties of natural phytate in chick diets. Nutr. Rep. Int. 35:949-956. Rennie, J. S., and C. C. Whitehead. 1996. Effectiveness of dietary 25- and l- hydroxycholecalciferol in combating tibial dyschondroplasia in broiler chickens. Br. Poult. Sci. 37:413-421. Rennie, J. S., C. C. Whitehead, and B. H. Thorp. 1993. The effect of dietary 1,25- dihydroxycholecalciferol in preventing tibial dyschondroplasia in broilers fed on diets imbalanced in calcium and phosphorus. Br. J. Nutr. 69:809-816. Robbins, K. R., H. W. Norton, and D. H. Baker. 1979. Estimation of nutrient requirements from growth data. J. Nutr. 109:1710-1714. Roberson, K. D. 1999. 25-hydroxycholecalciferol fails to prevent tibial dyschondroplasia in broiler chicks raised in battery brooders. J. Appl. Poult. Res. 8:54-61. Scheideler, S. E., P. R. Ferket. 2000. Phytase in broiler rations. Effects on carcass yields and incidence of tibial Dyschondroplasia. J. Appl. Poult. Res. 9:468-475. 113 Shafey, T. M., M. W. McDonald, and R. A. Pym. 1990. Effects of dietary calcium, available phosphorus and vitamin D on growth rate, food utilisation, plasma and bone constituents and calcium and phosphorus retention of commercial broiler strains. Br. Poult. Sci. 31:587-602. Soares, J. H., Jr., T. S. Shellum, and J. M. Kerr. 1990. Vitamin D receptor number and affinity in tibial dyschondroplasia. J. Bone Min. Res. 5(Suppl. 2):Sl67. (Abstr): 5 Soares, J. H., Jr., M. R. Swerdel, and E. H. Bossard. 1978. Phosphorus availability. 1. The effect of chick age and vitamin D metabolites on the availability of phosphorus in defluorinated phosphate. Poult. Sci. 57:1305-1312. Sorensen, P. 1991. The genetics of leg disorders. Pages 213-229 in Bone biology and skeletal disorders in poultry. C. C. Whitehead, ed. 23rd Poultry Science Symposium, Edinburgh, Scotland. Carfax publishing Co., Abingdon, England. Sunde, M. 1975. What about 25-hydroxycholecalciferol on poultry? Proc. Dist. Feed Res. Counc. 30: 53-62. Veltmann, J. R., Jr., and L. S. Jensen. 1980. Variations in the incidence of tibial dyschondroplasia associated with different environmental conditions. Avian Dis. 24: 625-630. Vieth, R., K. McCarten, and K. H. Norwich. 1990. Role of 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 dose in determining rat 1,25- dihydroxyvitamin D3 production. Am. J. Physiol. 258: E780-789. Walser, M. M., N. R. Allen, and C. T. Mirocha. 1980. Tibial dyscondroplasia induced by toxins of F usarium roseum. Poult. Sci. 59:1669-1670 (Abstr). Williams, C., D. David, and O. Iisma. 1962. The determination of chromic oxide in faeces samples by atomic absorption spectrophotometry. J. Agric. Sci. 59:381- 385. Woodzinsky, R. J., and A. H. J. Ullah. 1996. Phytase. Advan. Appl. Micro. 42:263-302. Yarger, J. G., C. L. Quarles, B. W. Hollis, and R. W. Gray. 1995a. Safety of 25- hydroxycholecalciferol as a source of cholecalciferol in poultry rations. Poult. Sci. 74:1437-1446. 114 Yarger, J. G., C. A. Saunders, J. L. McNaughton, C. L. Quarles, B. W. Hollis, and R. W. Gray. 1995b. Comparison of dietary 25-hydroxycholecalciferol and cholecalciferol in broiler chickens. Poult. Sci. 74:1159-1167. Zhang, X., G. Liu, G. R. McDaniel, and D. Roland. 1997. Responses of broiler lines selected for tibial dyschondroplasia incidence to supplementary 25- hydroxycholecalciferol. J. Appl. Poult. Res. 6:410-416. 115 Imm33113331131333»?u