£53.11... anal. 5:. ‘ .5. IFI. (ta 1 £21! I finanww.‘ AW “2,... . t 5:”. I THESIS 2004 379677457 LIBRARY Michigan State This is to certify that the University dissertation entitled CHARACTERIZATION OF A MALE SEA LAMPREY SEX PHEROMONE presented by MICHAEL J. SIEFKES has been accepted towards fulfillment of the requirements for the PhD. degree in Fisheries and Wildlife . / .Z/zwq A V Major ProWr’s Signature Date MSU is an Affirmative Action/Equal Opportunity Institution o~-.-.—-»-.-.—.-.--.-u-.----.- - . . PLACE IN RETURN BOX to remove this checkout from your record. To AVOID FINES return on or before date due. MAY BE RECALLED with earlier due date if requested. .NOV DATE DUE *0 2_ DATE DUE DATE DUE 6/01 c:/CIRC/DateDue.p65~p. 15 CHARACTERIZATION OF A MALE SEA LAMPREY SEX PHEROMONE By Michael J. Siefkes A DISSERTATION Submitted to Michigan State University In partial fulfillment of the requirements For the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Department of Fisheries and Wildlife 2003 ABSTRACT CHARACTERIZATION OF A MALE SEA LAMPREY SEX PHEROMONE By Michael J. Siefltes Past studies have shown that spermiating male sea lampreys (Petromyzon marinus) release a bile acid sex pheromone 7a, 12a, 24-tn'hydroxy-5a-cholan-3-one-24 sulfate (3-keto petromyzonol sulfate) that under laboratory conditions, induces search and preference behaviors in ovulating females. However, the site of synthesis and excretion of 3-keto petromyzonol sulfate, the electrophysiological potency and specificity of 3-keto petromyzonol sulfate to the olfactory organs of females, and the effectiveness of 3-keto petromyzonol sulfate and water conditioned with spermiating males in a natural spawning environment have not been determined. In addition, whether bisazir- sterilization of males (a current sea lamprey management technique) affects sex pheromone function and thus competitiveness, has not been determined. In this dissertation, results from behavioral assays, electro-olfactograms, biochemical analyses, and immunucytochemistry showed that 3-keto petromyzonol sulfate is produced in the liver and released exclusively through the gills of spermiating male sea lampreys. Also, electro-olfactograms indicated that 3-keto petromyzonol sulfate is detected at a concentration of 10"2 M and discriminated from other conspecific bile acids by the olfactory organs of female sea lampreys. Furthermore, in-stream behavioral assays demonstrated that 10'12 M 3-keto petromyzonol sulfate and water conditioned with spermiating males (containing 2 x 10"2 M 3kPZS) function in a natural spawning stream by attracting ovulating females 65 m to the source of each stimulus. Finally, behavioral assays, electro-olfactograms, and mass spectrometry showed that bisazir-sterilized males released a potent odorant (3-keto petromyzonol sulfate) that attracted ovulating females. Combined, these results further elucidate the mechanisms whereby mature males attract mature females and confirm that spermiating males release a sex pheromone that functions over relatively long distances. Overall, these results have the potential to impact sea lamprey management by facilitating the pursuit of techniques that exploit sex pheromone communication in sea lampreys and better our understanding of sex pheromone communication in fish and vertebrates. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank my advisor Dr. Weiming Li and the members of my graduate committee, Dr. Tom Coon, Dr. Doug Gage, Dr. Chris Goddard, and Dr. Dan Hayes for their guidance and support. I would also like to acknowledge my co-authors of the published papers contained in this dissertation; Mr. Roger Bergstedt, Dr. Weiming Li, Dr. Alexander Scott, Mr. Michael Twohey, Dr. Sang-Seon Yun, and Dr. Barbara Zielinski. Next, I am grateful to the staff of the US. Geological Survey, Hammond Bay Biological station and the US. Fish and Wildlife Service, Marquette Biological Station for supplying laboratory space, sea lampreys and technical assistance. Furthermore, I would like to extend a special thanks to Dolly Trump and Lydia Lorenz for the use of their private land adjacent to the Ocqueoc River and to the 19 undergraduate summer assistants who have helped me through the years. Finally, I thank the Great Lakes Fishery Commission for providing funding and enthusiastic support for this research. iv TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES ........................................................................................................... viii LIST OF FIGURES ............................................................................................................ ix INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................ 1 Sex pheromones in fish ............................................................................................ 1 Sex Pheromones of the sea lamprey ......................................................................... 2 The sea lamprey as a model system ......................................................................... 3 Application of sex pheromones in sea lamprey management ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, 5 Introduction of dissertation ...................................................................................... 6 Scientific significance .............................................................................................. 9 References .............................................................................................................. 10 CHAPTER 1 MALE SEA LAMPREYS, Petromyzon marinas L., EXCRETE A SEX PHEROMONE FROM GILL EPITHELIA ................................................................................................. 15 Abstract .................................................................................................................. 16 Introduction ............................................................................................................ 17 Materials and Methods ........................................................................................... 19 Collection and maintenance of animals ...................................................... 19 Collection of washings and extracts ........................................................... 19 Behavioral assays on water taken from the anterior and posterior regions of spermiating males .................................................................................. 22 Electro-olfactographic recordings on water from the anterior and posterior regions of Spermiating males ...................................................................... 23 Mass spectrometry analysis of water and urine from spermiating males_,23 ELISA of 3ketoPZS .................................................................................... 24 Immunocytochemistry for 3ketoPZS in the gills and liver of male sea lamnreys ..................................................................................................... 25 Electron microsc0pic analysis of gill tissues .............................................. 27 Results .................................................................................................................... 28 Discussion .............................................................................................................. 39 Acknowledgements ................................................................................................ 43 References .............................................................................................................. 44 CHAPTER 2 ELECTROPHYSIOLOGICAL EVIDENCE FOR DETECTION AND DISCRIMINATION OF PHEROMONAL BILE ACIDS BY THE OLFACTORY EPITHELIUM OF FEMALE SEA LAMPREYS (Petromyzon marinas) ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, 47 Abstract .................................................................................................................. 48 Introduction ............................................................................................................ 49 Materials and methods ........................................................................................... 53 EXperimental fish ....................................................................................... 53 Test Stimuli ................................................................................................ 53 Electro-olfactogram recording procedure ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, 54 Concentration-response relationships ........................................................ 55 Cross adaptation ......................................................................................... 56 Statistical analysis ...................................................................................... 57 Results .................................................................................................................... 59 Discussion .............................................................................................................. 65 Acknowledgements ................................................................................................ 71 References .............................................................................................................. 72 CHAPTER 3 A MALE SEA LAMPREY (Petromyzon marinus) SEX PHEROMONE THAT ATTRACTS OVULATING FEMALES IN A SPAWNING STREAM ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, 74 Abstract .................................................................................................................. 75 Introduction ............................................................................................................ 76 Materials and methods ........................................................................................... 78 Collection and maintenance of animals ..................................................... 78 Behavior in a Spawning stream .................................................................. 79 Independence tests of observed responses ................................................. 82 Results .................................................................................................................... 84 Discussion .............................................................................................................. 88 Acknowledgements ................................................................................................ 92 References .............................................................................................................. 93 CHAPTER 4 CHEMOSTERILIZATION OF MALE SEA LAMPREYS (Petromyzon marinus) DOES NOT AFFECT SEX PHEROMONE RELEASE ............................................................... 95 Abstract .................................................................................................................. 96 Introduction ............................................................................................................ 97 Materials and methods ......................................................................................... 100 Collection and maintenance of animals ................................................... 100 Sterilization of male sea lampreys ........................................................... 100 Identification of maturity ......................................................................... 101 Induction of Spenniation and ovulation ................................................... 101 Chemical stimuli used in experiments ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, _ 102 Experiment 1. In a two-choice maze, do ovulating females show preference and searching behaviors when exposed to water conditioned bisazir-sterilized, Spenniating males? ...................................................... 102 Experiment 2. In a spawning stream, are female sea lampreys attracted to water conditioned with bisazir-sterilized, spermiating males? ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, 104 Experiment 3. Do female olfactory organs show the same electrophysiological response to water conditioned with bisazir-sterilized and nonsterilized, Spermiating males? ..................................................... 105 vi Experiment 4. Do extracts of water conditioned with bisazir-sterilized and nonsterilized, spermiating males contain the same pheromone molecule? .................................................................................................................. 108 Results ............................................................ Discussion ...................................................... Acknowledgements ........................................ References SUMMARY OF DISSERTATION ............................ APPENDIX PERMISSION TO USE PUBLISHED MATERIAL vii 109 120 124 125 128 131 LIST OF TABLES Chapter 3 Table l. The distribution of ovulating and preovulating female sea lampreys swimming to the treatment (TRT), control (CON), or staying at an intermediate position (INT) within a section of a known sea lamprey spawning stream when water conditioned with spermiating males (SMW) and 10'12 M 3-keto petromyzonol sulfate (synthetic 3kPZS) treatments were used. The distributions of choices were significantly different between ovulating and preovulating females for each treatment suggesting an attraction by ovulating females to the treatments (Fisher’s Exact Test, 2-Tail, P < 0.03). Chapter 4 Table 1. Chemical stimuli from sterilized, spermiating male sea lampreys (Petromyzon marinas) induced preference responses from ovulating females only. N: sample size. Preference is the number of test subjects that spent proportionately more time after stimulus introduction in treatment (scented) side. P-values were determined using a Wilcoxon Signed Ranks Test (2-tailed) using indices of preference. NS: not significant (P > 0.10). Preference ratio is the mean ratio (standard deviation) of the time spent in seconds in the treatment/control sides after stimulus introduction. *indicates ovulating female tests using water conditioned with sterilized, spermiating males as the stimulus source. Table 2. Chemical stimuli from sterilized, spermiating male sea lampreys (Petromyzon marinus) increased searching responses from ovulating females only. N: sample size. Searching is the number of test subjects that spent proportionately more time swimming after stimulus introduction in treatment (scented) side. P-values were determined using a Wilcoxon Signed Ranks Test (2-tailed) using indices of preference. NS: not significant (P > 0.10). Searching ratio is the mean ratio (standard deviation) of the time in seconds spent swimming in the treatment/control sides after stimulus introduction. *indicates ovulating female tests using water conditioned with sterilized, spermiating males as the stimulus source. viii LIST OF FIGURES Chapter 1 Figure l. A) Schematic of the bisected aquarium used to collect washings from the anterior and posterior regions of spermiating male sea lampreys. (a) indicates the anterior and (b) the posterior chambers of the aquarium. A perforated acrylic tube (0), adjustable mesh tube ((1), and latex gasket (e) were used to hold lampreys in place and prevent contamination between the two chambers during washings. B) A female lamprey in the bisected aquarium during a dye test (used to verify that there was no leakage from one chamber to the other). The darker shading in the posterior chamber indicates the dye. Figure 2. Electro-olfactogram responses of female sea lampreys to washings collected from the anterior (filled diamonds; n = 6), posterior (filled triangles; n = 5), and whole body (open circles; 11 = 6) of spermiating males. Responses are expressed as a percentage of the response to a 10'5 M L-arginine standard. Vertical bars represent one standard error. Figure 3. Representative fast atom bombardment mass spectrometry analyses of extracts from the anterior (A) and posterior (B) regions of spermiating males. The most abundant ion in anterior extracts was at m/z 471, the same as the male sex pheromone and synthetic 3ketoPZS. Posterior extracts contained only trace amounts of this ion. Figure 4. Mean release rate of 3ketoPZS estimated from washings collected from anterior and posterior regions as well as directly from the gills of spermiating male sea lampreys. Vertical bars, one standard deviation. Figure 5. Confocal microscopy of pheromone immunocytochemistry against gill platelets from presperrniating (A-C) and spermiating (D and E) male lampreys. A and D) Low- power images; scale bar shown in A is 100 um. B,C, and E) High-power images; scale bar shown in B is 15 um. All are images of scans in a single Z plane. B and C) the interplatelet region sectioned following immunostaining from a single field of view. B was collected at 488 nm illumination, and the immunostaining is on the platelet surface along the basal region of the platelet. C was collected through transmitted light detection of bright-field microscopy. Figure 6. Subcellular localization of pheromone immunostaining. A-C) The interplatelet region of a spermiating male gill filament sectioned following immunostaining; scale bar shown in A is 15 pm. A and B) A single field of view. A is viewed at 488 nm and B through bright-field microscopy. C) Immunoreactivity in the supranuclear region of epithelial cells in the interplatelet epithelium. D and E) Pheromone immunoreactivity in the platelet and interplatlet regions following lipid solubilization with 0.1% Triton-X100; scale bar shown in D is 100 pm. Figure 7. Transmission electron microscopy of gill platelets from a spermiating male. A- C are the same magnification; scale bar in A is 0.5 pm. A) A low microvillar platelet cell. These cells contain small electron lucent vesicles (thin arrows), large electron Opaque granules (short thick arrows), and smooth endoplasmic reticulum (sER). B) A cuboidal cell from the basal region of the interplatelet region has a dome-shaped apical surface, rough endoplasmic reticulum (rER), Golgi apparatus (G), electron dense vesicles (arrow), dense core vesicles (dcv), and electron lucent vesicles (elv). C) The supranuclear cytoplasm of an interplatelet cell contains electron opaque granules (arrows) and smooth endoplasmic reticulum (sER). D) The perinuclear cytoplasm of an interplatelet cell with granules of varying sizes and electron density (arrows) and tubular cistemae of smooth endoplasmic reticulum (sER); scale bar in D is 1 pm. Figure 8. Pheromone immunostaining in the liver of spermiating (A) and presperrniating (B) male sea lampreys; scale bar in A is 50 um. Both images were acquired using a X60 oil immersion objective with the same laser power, gain, iris diameter constant, and black level to avoid artifacts from differences in exposure and settings. Chapter 2 Figure 1. Molecular structure of sea lamprey bile acids. A 3a, 7a, 12a, 24-tetrahydroxy— 5a-cholan-24-sulfate; Petromyzonol sulfate; PZS, B 7a, 12a, 24-trihydroxy-50t-cholan- 3-one-24-sulfate; 3 keto-petromyzonol sulfate; 3kPZS, C 3a, 7a, 120t-trihydroxy-50t- cholan-24-oic-acid; Allocholic acid; ACA, and D 7a, l2a-dihydroxy-5a-cholan-3-one- 24-oic-acid; 3 keto-allocholic acid; 3kACA. P28 and ACA are released by larval sea lampreys and 3kPZS and 3kACA are released by spermiating male sea lampreys. Notice that P28 and 3kPZS possess a sulfate group, while ACA and 3kACA possess a carboxyl group on carbon 24. Also notice that P28 and ACA possess a hydroxyl group whereas 3kPZS and 3kACA possess a carbonyl group on carbon 3. Figure 2. A Semi-logarithmic plots of electro-olfactogram (EOG) concentration- responses to sea lamprey bile acids (allocholic acid, ACA; petromyzonol sulfate, P28; 3 keto-allocholic acid, 3kACA; 3 keto-petromyzonol sulfate, 3kPZS). B Semi-logarithmic plots of EOG concentration-responses to water conditioned with spermiating males (SMW) and 3kPZS. C and D expanded view of responses in A and B, respectively showing response threshold concentrations. The response threshold for a given odor is the lowest concentration that elicits a response significantly greater than the control (students t-test, P<0.05). The asterisks (*) denote the response threshold of 3kPZS in C and 3kPZS and SMW in D. The carrot (A) denotes the response threshold of the other bile acids in C. Mean response magnitudes are presented as a percentage of the response elicited by a 10‘5 M L-arginine standard solution. Vertical bars represent one standard error. Numbers by the abbreviations indicate sample sizes Figure 3. Results of cross-adaptation experiments, grouped by the five adapting stimuli: A) 3 keto-petromyzonol sulfate, 3kPZS; B) 3 keto-allocholic acid, 3kACA; C) petromyzonol sulfate, PZS; D) allocholic acid, ACA; E) water conditioned with spermiating males, SMW. Mean percent initial responses (PIR) are shown with horizontal lines representing one standard error. For each adapting stimulus, the response to self-adapted controls is underlined. Number symbols (#) signify that a particular test stimulus was completely adapted to control levels, meaning the test stimulus PIR was not different from the self-adapted control PIR (P>0.05, Dunnett’s test). Asterisks (*) signify that a particular test stimulus was partially adapted, meaning the test stimulus PIR was different from the self-adapted control PIR (P<0.05, Dunnett’s test), but the test stimulus response during adaptation was less than the response before adaptation (responses in mV not shown; P<0.05, paired t-test). Carrots (A) signify that a particular test stimulus was not adapted, meaning the test stimulus response during adaptation was the same as the response before adaptation (responses in mV not shown; P>0.05, paired t-test). Numbers by the bars indicate sample sizes. The numbers by the abbreviations are the logarithmic values of the molar concentrations for the tested stimuli. NT, not tested. Chapter 3 Figure 1. The spawning stream layout used in radio tracking experiments. C1 and C2 indicate points in which water conditioned with spermiating males or 3-keto petromyzonol sulfate and control odorants were randomly introduced. A indicates the acclimation cage in which females were held before testing. Arrows indicate water flow. The dashed line represents the downstream block net used to prevent lampreys from exiting the study site. Chapter 4 Figure 1. (a) Representative electro-olfactogram (EOG) responses of female sea lampreys (Petromyzon marinas) to chemical stimuli from sterilized, spermiating males (SSM, diamonds), non-sterilized, spermiating males (SM, open circles), and non- sterilized, pre-spermiating males (PSM, filled circles). Std designates the response to a 10‘5 M L-arginine standard and Can the response to a blank water control. Numbers along the x-axis indicate the logarithmic value of the dilution from the original conditioned water collected by holding one male in 10 l for 4 h. (b) Female sea lamprey EOG dose-response relationships to SSM (N = 8), SM (N = 8), and PSM (N = 4) chemical stimuli. Responses are measured as a percentage of the response to a 10'5 M L- arginine standard. Vertical bars represent one standard error. Figure 2. (a) Representative electro-olfactogram (EOG) responses of female sea lampreys (Petromyzon marinas) to chemical stimuli from sterilized spermiating male (SSM) and nop-gterilized spermiating male (SM) before (white bars) and during (shaded bars) adaptatiofr to a SSM chemical stimuli. Std designates the response to a 10'5 M L- arginine standard and Con the response to a blank water control. Female EOG responses to a 10'5 M L-arginine standard, SSM and SM chemical stimuli both before and during adaptation to SSM (b) and SSM (c) chemical stimuli were measured. Vertical bars represent one standard deviation. Figure 3. Negative and positive fast atom bombardment mass spectrometry (10 KV) spectrum of (a) extracts of water conditioned with non-sterilized spermiating male sea xi lampreys (Petromyzon marinas) and (b) extracts of water conditioned with sterilized spermiating males. xii INTRODUCTION Sex pheromones in fish A pheromone is composed of “substances that are excreted to the outside by an individual of the same species in which they release a specific reaction, for example a definite behavior or developmental process” (Karlson and Luscher 1959). Many fish species release potent odorants that function as sex pheromones during final maturation (Reviews: Scott and Vermeirssen 1994; Stacey et al. 1994). Specifically, sex pheromones in fish have been shown to stimulate vitellogenesis (Van Weerd and Kamen 1998) and ovulation (Dmitrieva and Ostroumov 1986), induce courtship behavior (Ostroumov and Dmitrieva 1990) and synchronize the release of sperm and eggs (Stacey and Hoursten 1982). To date the majority of sex pheromone research in fish has focused on female sex pheromones. A good example is the goldfish, Carassius auratus sex pheromone system where at least three compounds have been identified and function to synchronize goldfish spawning physiology and behaviors (Sorensen and Scott 1994). Other female pheromones in fish have also been characterized in species such as rainbow trout, Oncorhynchus mykiss (Newcombe & Hartman 1973, Scott et al. 1994); Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar (Waring et al 1996); zebrafish, Brachydanio reri (Lambert et al. 1986; Van Den Hurk and Resink 1992); and loach, Misgurnus anguillicaudatus (Kitamura and Ogata 1990). Male sex pheromones, although less extensively studied than female sex pheromones in fish, have been reported in numerous species such as Ictalurid catfish (Todd et al. 1967; Richards 1974); steelhead, Oncorhynchus mykiss (Newcombe & Hartman 1973); blenny, Blennius pavo (Laumen et al. 1974); five belontiid species (Lee & Ingersoll 1979); black goby, Gobiusjozo (Colombo et al. 1980, 1982); and Pacific herring, Clupea harengus pallasi (Stacey & Hourston 1982; Sherwood et al. 1991; Carolsfeld et al. 1997). These pheromones have been found to attract mature females to mature males or to induce physiological changes such as ovulation in female conspecifics. Sex pheromones of the sea lamprey Mature male sea lampreys have long been suspected of releasing sex pheromones. In France, where sea lampreys were collected for food, fishermen used mature males as bait to lure females to their traps (F ontaine I93 8). When placed in a two-choice maze, mature females spent more time in the compartment where washings from sexually mature males had been introduced (Teeter 1980). Also, in a two-choice maze anchored in a spawning stream, mature females were attracted to mature males (Li 1994). This makes sense in the context of sea lamprey reproductive biology, because it is usually the male who initiates nest building, a process joined later by one or more females and males (Applegate 1950). In addition, it has been demonstrated that spermiating males release a potent odorant that could be a sex pheromone (Li 1994; Bjerselius et al. 1996; Siefltes 2000). Recent research indicates that spermiating male sea lampreys release a sex pheromone 7a, 12a, 24-trihydroxy-5a-cholan-3-one-24-sulfate (3 keto-petromyzonol sulfate, or 3kPZS), which elicits search and preference responses from ovulating females in a two-choice maze and natural spawning stream (Siefltes 2000; Li et al. 2002). Sperrniating males were also found to release another bile acid, 7a, 120t-dihydroxy-50t- cholan-3-one-24-oic-acid (3 keto-allocholic acid, 3kACA; Yun et al. 2003a); however, it has not been experimentally tested for any sex pheromone function. Pre-spermiating males were not attractive to ovulating females and did not release 3kPZS or 3kACA. The sea lamprey as a model system The sea lamprey offers a unique animal model for studies of sex pheromone communication in vertebrates. This species represents Cephalaspidomorphi, one of the two extant groups of Agnathan, or jawless fishes, and thus is among the most primitive vertebrate species available for examination of pheromone-induced behaviors. Understanding the functions of its sex pheromone will offer new insights into the evolution of pheromone communication among vertebrate animals. Another unique feature of the sea lamprey is that it is monorhynic or has only a single olfactory organ, which precludes the possibility of simultaneous comparison of odor intensities across space. This makes it a great challenge to localize and approach odor sources. Yet it has been demonstrated that sea lampreys rely on odorants to identify conspecific individuals, prey, spawning streams, and mates. Presumably sea lampreys have evolved innate locomotion patterns which, when displayed upon detection of relevant odorants, bring sea lampreys to the source of odorants. By examining the components of sex pheromones and the behavioral patterns elicited by them, an understanding of behavioral mechanisms whereby animals localize or approach odor sources can be developed. The sea lamprey also offers a useful model for studying specificity of chemical communication throughout life history. Sea lampreys develop through three distinct life stages, all regulated to some degree by odorants. Growth of larval sea lampreys appears to be regulated by metabolites of conspecifics (Mallatt 1983). After a radical transformation, juvenile sea lampreys enter a parasitic stage during which they rely on odorants to localize host fish (Kleerekoper and Mogensen 1963; Kleerekoper and van Erkel 1960). In early spring, sea lampreys start to enter certain rivers to spawn. Recent studies Show that adults rely on a larval odorant to select suitable spawning streams (Teeter 1980; Moore and Schleen 1980; Li 1994; Bjerselius et al. 2000; Polkinghome et al. 2001; Vrieze and Sorensen 2002). Finally, once sea lampreys are on the spawning grounds, spermiating males release a pheromone that attracts ovulating females to their nest (Sietkes 2000; Li et al. 2002). Finally, the sea lamprey offers an intriguing model for the use of sex pheromones in management of vertebrate pest species. Sex pheromones have been used extensively to control undesirable insects (Carde and Minks 1995), but similar techniques have not been applied to vertebrate pests because either the pheromones or their functions have not been identified or where they have, pheromones have not been shown to function in natural conditions or over distances great enough to be effective. The spermiating male sea lamprey sex pheromone is the first male sex pheromone identified in fish and one of the few sex pheromones identified in vertebrates. Moreover it is the first bile acid sex pheromone identified in fish and has been shown to function under natural conditions over distances as great as 65 meters (Li et al. 2002). Application of sex pheromones in sea lamprey management The Sea Lamprey is a non-indigenous species and an often-lethal parasite of the larger fishes in the upper Great Lakes (eg. Bergstedt and Schneider 1988; Kitchell 1990). The sea lamprey invasion caused economic and ecological tragedy in terms of their impact on the fish communities in the Great Lakes (Smith and Tibbles 1980). Sea lamprey management is essential to restore and maintain the Great Lakes ecosystem and a sustainable fishery (Bergstedt and Schneider 1988). Currently lampricides, barriers, trapping, and sterile male releases are used to control sea lamprey populations (Klar and Young 2002). However, sea lampreys continue to be a significant source of mortality for large and medium sized fish in the Great Lakes (Bergstedt and Schneider 1988; Kitchell 1990). For this reason, and the fact that current control techniques have the potential to be costly and environmentally damaging (Smith and Tibbles 1980; Lamsa et al. 1980), the development of additional means of sea lamprey management needs to occur. At the first Sea Lamprey International Symposium held in 1979 (Smith 1980), it was proposed that pheromones, if identified, could be used in the management of sea lamprey populations in the Great Lakes (Teeter 1980). Potential management strategies using pheromones are based on the premise that natural odorants produced by sea lampreys can influence or disrupt spawning behaviors and ultimately, reproduction. Spawning sea lampreys congregate in known streams across the Great Lakes basin and are targeted efficiently. Sea lampreys have well-developed olfactory organs (Kleerekoper 1972) and large olfactory bulbs relative to brain size (Stoddart 1990). This anatomically dominant system is highly sensitive to a unique variety of compounds (Li 1994; Li et al. 1995) that regulate prey searching, migration and mating (Kleerekoper and Mogensen 1959; 1963; Teeter 1980; Bjerselius et al. 2000). Management strategies based on exploitation of the sea lamprey sense of smell and odor-induced behaviors are likely to be effective, efficient and environmentally sound. Several strategies have been proposed to exploit the sex pheromone communication of sea lampreys for management purposes (Li et al. 2003; Twohey et al. 2003). One way is to develop techniques to enhance the biosynthesis and release of 3kPZS in sterilized males in hopes that they successfully obtain more mates. A second way is to use a synthetic copy of 3kPZS for attraction and annihilation of females. Other possible ways include exploiting biochemical and physiological processes to disrupt the signaling system (either preventing males from releasing sex pheromone or preventing females from detecting it) and using a possible physiological priming sex pheromone to disrupt final maturation in both males and females. Introduction of dissertation Although many questions have been answered regarding the sex pheromone communication system of sea lampreys, much more needs to be known about the production, release, detection and function of the spermiating male sex pheromone before it can be incorporated into sea lamprey management. The goal of this dissertation was to expand upon the knowledge already known about a male sea lamprey sex pheromone (Li et al. 2002). The chapters of this dissertation will cover the four objectives outlined below, which were designed to fill in critical gaps in the knowledge of this pheromone communication system. Objective 1: Determine the release site of sex pheromone in spermiating male sea lampreys It has long been thought that the urine was the source of sex pheromones in male sea lampreys (Teeter 1980). Alternatively, recent research has suggested that 3kPZS is released from the gills of spermiating males (Li et al. 2002; You et al. 2003a), however, there has been no concrete evidence for the gill release pathway suggested in the recent studies. If the production and release sites of 3kPZS are known, it may provide a means to disrupt sex pheromone production and release, which could reduce a male’s reproductive success. Also, information on the production site of 3kPZS may assist in finding its synthetic pathway and ultimately may yield a cheaper way to manufacture this compound in mass quantities, which currently is quite costly. Objective 2: Determine if bile acids released by conspecific larvae and adult sea lampreys possess different odor qualities and can be distinguished from one another by female olfactory organs. In a natural stream, there are many bile acid compounds that are very similar in structure to 3kPZS. Larval sea lamprey (also present in spawning streams) release 3a, 7a, 12a, 24-tetrahydroxy-5a-cholan-24-sulfate (petromyzonol sulfate, P28) and 3a, 7a, 120t-trihydroxy-5a-cholan-24-oic-acid (allocholic acid, ACA), bile acids associated with adult sea lamprey migration. Also, spermiating male sea lampreys release another bile acid, 3kACA that may also act as a sex pheromone or is a component of the male sex pheromone. The ability to distinguish between these odorants of similar chemical structure seems challenging for sea lampreys and has not been experimentally determined. This could provide information on the complexity of the sea lamprey olfactory system and may provide insight into developing sea lamprey management strategies. Also, information on the potency of 3kPZS will provide clues on the concentrations at which this sex pheromone could be used in sea lamprey management. Objective 3: Determine if the male sex pheromone is eflective in a natural spawning environment. Traps baited with sex pheromones have been a common practice to control undesirable insects (Carde and Minks 1995), but similar techniques have not been applied to vertebrate pests because either the signals and their functions have not been identified or where they have, pheromones have not been shown to attract target individuals in natural conditions or over distances great enough to be effective. Water conditioned with spermiating males and synthetic 3kPZS have not yet been demonstrated to function in a spawning environment. Information on the effectiveness of male sex pheromone in a natural spawning stream will provide valuable preliminary data on the feasibility of developing pheromone-baited traps for integrated sea lamprey management. Objective 4: Determine if bisazir-sterilization of male sea lampreys inhibits sex pheromone release and function An important premise behind the sterile male release technique is that the sterilization process does not negatively affect the mating competency of sterilized individuals (Knipling 1964). It has not yet been determined if bisazir-sterilization inhibits sex pheromone release and function, but if it does, the ability of sterilized males to attract mates would be reduced. Determining the effect of sterilization on the male sex pheromone will provide justification for the use of the sterile male release technique and precludes the creation of pheromone-enhanced sterilized males. Scientific significance Results from this study may lead to the development of new concepts and techniques for integrated sea lamprey management and provide the first use of pheromones in the management of a vertebrate species. In addition to the direct relevance to sea lamprey management, results advance our understanding of pheromone communication in fish and vertebrates. This is the first male sex pheromone and first bile acid sex pheromone identified in fish and has been shown to function at low concentrations in a natural environment. Moreover this study offers the first example that gills contain the machinery to and do actively release a sex pheromone. In the long run, information on how this pheromone is produced and released and how adult sea lampreys smell bile acids produced by conspecifics will bring benefits outside of sea lamprey management that are not immediately apparent. REFERENCES Applegate, V. C. 1950. Natural history of the sea lamprey (Petromyzon marinas) in Michigan. United States Fish and Wildlife Service Special Scientific Report. Fisheries Service 55: 237 pp. Bergstedt, R. A. and Schneider, C. P. 1988. Assessment of sea lamprey (Petromyzon marinas) predation by recovery of dead lake trout (Salvelinus namaycush) from Lake Ontario, 1982-85. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 45: 1406-1410. Bjerselius, R., Li, W., Sorensen, P. W., and Scott, A. P. 1996. Sperrniated male sea lamprey release a potent sex pheromone. In: Proceedings of the fifth international symposium on the reproductive physiology of fish, edited by: Thomas, P. and F. Goetz, Austin, TX, pp. 271. Bjerselius, R., Li, W., Teeter, J. H., Seelye, J. G., Johnsen, P. B., Maniak, P. J., Grant, G. C., Polkinghome, C. N., and Sorensen, P. W. 2001. Direct behavioral evidence that unique bile acids released by larval sea lamprey (Petromyzon marinas) function as a migratory pheromone. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 57: 557-569. Carde, R. T. and Minks, A. K. 1995. Control of moth pests by mating disruption: success and constraints. Ann. Rev. Entomol., 40: 559—585. Carolsfeld, J ., Tester, M., Kreiberg, H., and Sherwood, N. M. 1997. Pheromone-induced spawning of pacific herring .1. behavioral characterization. Hormon. Behav., 31(3): 256-268. Colombo, L., Marconato, A., Colombo Belvédere, P. and Frisco, C. 1980. Endocrinology of teleost reproduction: A testicular steroid pheromone in black goby, Gobiusjozo. L. B011. 2001. 47: 355-364. Colombo, L., Colombo Belvédére, P., Marconato, A., and F. Bentivegna, F. 1982. Pheromones in teleost fish. In: Proceedings of the International Symposium on Reproductive Physiology of Fish, edited by C.J.J. Richter, C. J. J. and Goos. H.J.Th., Wageningen, The Netherlands, 2-6 August 1982. Pudoc Wageningen, pp. 89-94. Dmitrieva, T. M. and Ostroumov, V. A. 1986. The role of chemical communication in the organization of spawning behavior of the yellowfin Baikal sculpin (Cottocomephorus grewingki). Biol. Nauki (Moscow) No. 10. pp. 38-42. Fontaine, M. 1938. La lamproie marine. Sa peche et son importance economique. Bull. Sco. Oceanogr. Fr. 17: 1681-1687. 10 Karlson, P. and Luscher, M. 1959. “Pheromones”: a new term for a class of biologically active substances. Nature. 183: 55-56. Kitamura, S. and Ogata, H. 1991. Olfactory responses of male loach, Misgumus anguillicaudatus, to F-type prostaglandins. In Proceedings of the 24‘h Japanese Symposium on Taste and Smell, Tsu, Japan, Novemeber 8-9, 1990. IRL Press, Oxford. Pp. 163-166. Kitchell, J. F. 1990. The scope for mortality caused by sea lamprey. Trans. Amer. Fish. Soc. 119: 642-648. Klar, G. T. and Young, R. J. 2002. Integrated management of sea lampreys in the Great Lakes 2002. USFWS, Department of Fisheries and Oceans Canada, Annual Report to the Great Lakes Fishery Commission, Marquette, Michigan. Kleerekoper, H. 1972. The sense organs. In: The Biology of Lampreys, vol. 2, edited by: Hardistry, M. W. and I. C. Potter, Academic Press, New York, pp. 373—404. Kleerkoper, H. and Mogensen, J. 1959. The chemical composition of scent of fresh water fish with special reference to amines and amino acids. Zeitsch. Vergl. Physiol. 42: 492-500. Kleerekoper, H. and Mogensen, J. 1963. Role of olfaction in the orientation of Petromyzon marinus. 1. Response to a single amine in prey’s body odor. Physiol. 2001. 36: 347-360. Kleerekoper, H. and Van Erkel, G. A. 1960. The olfactory apparatus of Petromyzon marinus L. Can. J. Zool. 36: 347-360. Knipling, ER 1964. The potential role of the sterility method for insect population control with special reference to combining this method with conventional methods. US. Dept. Agric. Res. Serv. ARS-33-98. Lambert, J. G. D., Van Den Hurk, R., Schoonen, W. G. E. J., Resink, J. W., and Van Oordt, P. F. W. J. 1986. Gonadal steroidogenesis and the possible role of steroid glucuronides as sex pheromones in two species of teleosts. Fish Physiol. Biochem. 2: 101-107. Lamsa, A. K., Rovainen, C. M., Kolenosky, D. P., and Hansen, L. H. 1980. Sea lamprey control — where to from here? Report to the SLIS control theory task force. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 37: 2175-2192. Laumen, J ., Pem, U. and Blum, V. 1974. Investigations on the function and hormonal regulation of the anal appendices in Blennius pavo (Risso). J. Treat. Zool. 190: 47-56. 11 Lee, C.-T. and Ingersoll, D.W. 1979. Social chemosignals in five Belontiidae (Pisces) species. J. Comp. Physiol. Psych. 93: 117-118. Li, W. 1994. The olfactory biology of adult sea lamprey (Petromyzon marinas). PhD thesis. University of Minnesota. Li, W., Sorensen, P. W., and Gallaher, D. D. 1995. The olfactory system of migratory adult sea lamprey (Petromyzon marinus) is specifically and acutely sensitive to unique bile acids released by conspecific larvae. J. Gen Physiol. 105: 567-587. Li, W., Scott, A. P., Siefkes, M. J., Yan, H., Liu, Q, Yun, S-S, and Gage, D. A. 2002. Bile acid secreted by male sea lamprey that acts as a sex pheromone. Science 296: 138- 141. Li, W., Sietkes, M. J ., Scott, A. P., and Teeter, J. H. In press. Sex pheromone communication in the sea lamprey: implications for integrated management. J. Great Lakes Res. Mallatt, J. 1983. The suspension feeding mechanism of the larval lamprey Petromyzon marinus. J. 2001. 194: 103-142. Moore, H. H. and Schleen, L. P. 1980. Changes in spawning runs of sea lamprey (Petromyzon marinas) in selected streams of Lake Superior after chemical control. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 37:1851-1860. Newcombe, C. and Hartman, G. 1973. Some chemical signals in the spawning behavior of rainbow trout (Salmo gairdneri). J. Fish. Res. Board Can. 30: 995-997. Ostroumov, V. A. and Dmitrieva, T. M. 1990. Influence of sex pheromones on gonad maturation and behavior in Coregonus autumnalis migratorius. Voprosy Ikhtiologii 30, 497-501. Polkinghome, C. N., Olson, J. M., Gallaher, D. G., and Sorensen, P. W. 2001. Larval sea lamprey release two unique bile acids to the water at a rate sufficient to produce detectable riverine pheromone plumes. Fish. Physiol. Biochem. 24: 15-30. Richards, 1. S. 1974. Caudal neurosecretory system: Possible role in pheromone production. J. Treat. 2001. 187: 405-408. Scott, A. P. and Vermeirssen, E. L. M. 1994. Production of conjugated steroids by teleost gonads and their role as pheromones. In: Perspectives in Comparative Endocrinology, edited by Davey, K. G., R. E. Peter, and S. S. Tobe, National Research Council of Canada, Ottawa, pp. 645-654. 12 Scott, A. P., Liley, N. R., and Vermeirssen, E. L. M. 1994. Urine of reproductively mature female rainbow trout, Oncorhynchus mykiss(Wa1baum), contains a priming pheromone which enhances plasma levels of sex steroids and gonadotrophin II in males. J. Fish Biol. 44: 131-147. Sherwood, N. M., Kyle, A. L., Kreiberg, H., Warby, C. M., Magnus, T. H., Carolsfeld, J ., and Price, W. S. 1991. Partial characterization of a spawning pheromone in the herring Clupea harengus pallas. Can. J. 2001. 69(1): 91-103. Siefltes, M. J. 2000. Sperrniating male sea lampreys release a sex pheromone that attracts post—ovulatory female sea lampreys. Masters Thesis. Michigan State University. Smith, B. R. 1980. Introduction to the proceedings of the 1979 sea lamprey international symposium (SLIS). Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 37: 1585-1587. Smith, B. R. and Tibbles, J. J. 1980. Sea lamprey (Petromyzon marinas) in lakes Huron, Michigan and Superior: history of invasion and control, 1936-78. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 37: 1780-1801. Sorensen, P. W. and Scott, A. P. 1994. The evolution of hormonal sex pheromones in teleost fish: poor correlation between the pattern of steroid release by goldfish and olfactory sensitivity suggests that these cues evolved as a result of chemical spying rather than signal specialization. Acta. Physiol. Scand. 152: 191-205. Stacey, N. E. and A. S. Hourston. 1982. Spawning and feeding behavior of captive pacific herring, Clupea harengus pallasi. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 39: 489-498. Stacey, N. E., Cardwell, J. R., Liley, N. R., Scott, A. P., and Sorensen, P. W. 1994. Hormones as sex pheromones in fish. In: Perspectives in Comparative Endocrinology, edited by Davey, K.G., R.E. Peter, and SS. Tobe, National Research Council of Canada, Ottawa. Pp. 438-448. Stoddart, D. M. 1990. The Scented Ape: the Biology and Culture of Human Odor. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge. Teeter, J. 1980. Pheromone communication in sea lampreys (Petromyzon marinas): Implications for population management. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 37: 2123-2132. Todd, J. H., Atema, J. and Bardach, J. E. 1967. Chemical communication in social behavior of fish, the yellow bullhead (Ictalurus natalis). Science 158: 672-673. Twohey, M. B., Sorensen, P. W., and Li, W. In press. How might new knowledge of pheromone communication in sea lamprey contribute to an integrated sea lamprey management program? J. Great Lakes Res. 13 Van Den Hurk, R. and Resink, J. W. 1992. Male reproductive system as a sex pheromone producer in teleost fish. J. Exp. Zool. 26]: 204-213. Van Weerd, J. H. and Kamen, J. 1998. The effects of chronic stress on growth of fish: a critical appraisal. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. A. 120: 107-112. Vrieze L, Sorensen PW (2001) Laboratory assessment of the role of a larval pheromone and natural stream odor in spawning stream localization by migratory sea lamprey (Petromyzon marinus). Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 58:2374-2385 Waring, C. R, Moore, A., and Scott, A. P. 1996. Milt and endocrine responses of mature male Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.) parr to water-bome testosterone, 17,20b- dihydroxy-4-pregnen-3-one 20-sulfate, and the urines from adult female and male salmon. Gen. Comp. Endocrin. 103: 142-149. Yun, S-S, Scott, A. P. and Li, W. 2003. Pheromones of the male sea lamprey, Petromyzon marinus L: structural studies on a new compound, 3-keto allocholic acid, and 3-keto petromyzonol sulfate. Steroids, 68: 297-304. Yun, S-S, Siefkes, M. J ., Scott, A. P., and Li, W. 2002. Development and application of an ELISA for sea lamprey male sex pheromone. Gen. Comp. Endocrin. 129: 163-170. 14 CHAPTER 1 MALE SEA LAMPREYS, Petromyzon marinas L., EXCRETE A SEX PHEROMONE FROM GILL EPITHELIA Siefltes, M.J., Scott, A.P., Zielinski, B., Yun, S.-S., and Li, W. 2003. Male sea lampreys, Petromyzon marinas L., excrete a sex pheromone from gill epithelia. Biology of Reproduction, 69:125-132. 15 ABSTRACT During the period when they are producing sperm, male sea lampreys (Petromyzon marinus L.) release a sex pheromone 7a, 12a, 24-trihydroxy-50t-cholan-3- one-24-sulfate (3 keto-petromyzonol sulfate, 3ketoPZS) that induces search and preference behaviors in ovulating females. In this study, we conducted a series of experiments to demonstrate that release of this pheromone into water takes place exclusively through the gills. In a behavioral maze, water conditioned with the anterior region of spermiating males induced an increase of search and preference behaviors in ovulating females. Similar behavior was not elicited by water conditioned by the posterior region. The anterior region washings and whole body washings from spermiating males also elicited large and virtually identical electro-olfactogram responses from female sea lampreys, while the posterior washings produced negligible responses. Further, mass spectrometry and immunoassay confirmed that virtually all the 3ketoPZS released into water was through the gills. Immunocytochemistry revealed some gill epithelial cells and hepatocytes from spermiating males contained dense immunoreactive 3ketoPZS, but not those from prespermiating males. These results demonstrate that 3ketoPZS is released through the gill epithelia, and suggest that this pheromone or its precursor may be produced in the liver. 16 INTRODUCTION Spermiating male sea lampreys (a “spermiating” lamprey is one from which milt [spermatozoa plus seminal fluid] can be expressed by gentle manual pressure), Petromyzon marinus L. release a bile acid, 7a, 12a, 24-trihydroxy-5a-cholan-3-one-24- sulfate (3 keto-petromyzonol sulfate, 3ketoPZS), which acts as an attractant for ovulating females [1]. Although this sex pheromone has been identified and its function demonstrated, its mode of synthesis and excretion remains elusive. Bile acids are typically produced in the liver, secreted into the gall bladder, and excreted through the intestine along with feces [2, 3]. Larval sea lampreys appear to have evolved this route as well [4, 5]. However, this same route is not available to adult sea lampreys, which lack gall bladders and bile ducts [6]. In river lamprey Lampetrafluviatilis, the gills of spawning males contain large glandular cells [7, 8] that have been postulated to “secrete some substance of sexual significance” [7]. More recently, we showed that water from the anterior region of spermiating males (bathing the gills) contained far more immunoreactive 3ketoPZS than water from the posterior region [9] and suggested that gills may mediate the release of this pheromone compound [1]. However, there was no proof that this compound emanated from the gills rather than from some other part of the anterior region and certainly no direct link to the glandular cells. Further, there was no corroborating chemical and biological evidence from any other procedure that 3ketoPZS was indeed emanated mainly from the anterior region. 17 The main hypothesis that we address in the present study is that the male pheromone is released into the water via the glandular cells of the gills. Our expectations are 1) that the results of ELISA [9], which showed that 3ketoPZS was released largely from the anterior region of spermiating males, can be confirmed by mass spectrometry, electro-olfactogram and behavior induction in ovulating females; 2) that water emitted by gills (before it touches any other tissues) contain 3ketoPZS at a level comparable to that estimated from anterior body washings; 3) that the unusual glandular cells in the gills will stain immunocytochemically with antibodies to 3ketoPZS; and 4) that the gills of spermiating males have many more of these cells than the gills of prespermiating males. 18 MATERIALS AND METHODS Collection and maintenance of animals This research was approved by the Michigan State University, All University Committee on Animal Use and Care and complied with all federal and state laws, policies, and rules for the humane use of laboratory animals in research. Adult sea lampreys were collected from tributaries to lakes Huron and Michigan by the staff of the US. Fish and Wildlife Service, Marquette Biological Station, Marquette, MI. The animals were transported to the main laboratory at the US. Geological Survey, Hammond Bay Biological Station, Millersburg, MI. Males and females were separated and held in flow-through tanks (1000 L) with Lake Huron water at temperatures ranging from 7°C to 20°C. Males and females were checked periodically for spermiation and ovulation according to the criteria and procedures reported [10]. Any spermiating and ovulating individuals were separated into two other tanks, respectively. Collection of washings and extracts Washings from the anterior and posterior regions of spermiating males were collected using a bisected, acrylic aquarium (Figure 1). A divider with a hole to accommodate a sea lamprey’s head was fixed in the middle of the aquarium to make two separate chambers. The hole was lined with a latex gasket that, when the male was in place, prevented water from flowing between the two chambers. A perforated acrylic l9 I{'-""'I'¥ """"""""" 7| b---—i—h —————————————— & Figure l. A) Schematic of the bisected aquarium used to collect washings from the anterior and posterior regions of spermiating male sea lampreys. (a) indicates the anterior and (b) the posterior chambers of the aquarium. A perforated acrylic tube (c), adjustable mesh tube (d), and latex gasket (e) were used to hold lampreys in place and prevent contamination between the two chambers during washings. B) A female lamprey in the bisected aquarium during a dye test (used to verify that there was no leakage from one chamber to the other). The darker shading in the posterior chamber indicates the dye. 20 tube was mounted on one side of the hole to immobilize the anterior region. The posterior region was held in flexible plastic mesh that was tightened according to the size of the male. During a washing, a spermiating male was anaesthetized with tricaine methane sulfonate (MS-222; Argent Chemical Laboratories, Redmond, WA) and placed headfirst through the gasket/divider, making sure all the gills were located in the forward chamber. The plastic mesh tube around the posterior region was then tightened. The anterior chamber was filled with 7 L of water, the latex gasket inspected for leaks, and then the posterior chamber filled with 7 L of water. Each chamber was aerated, and the male was held this way for 1 h. At the end, all the water was siphoned into buckets and either used directly in experiments or extracted as previously reported [1]. For extractions, water was pre-filtered with No. 3 Watman filter paper (Millipore Corp., Bedford, MA) and then drawn through activated Sep-Pak octadecylsilane cartridges (Waters, Milford, MA). These were then washed with distilled water, eluted with methanol, and stored at -80°C. To prove that there was no leakage across the latex gasket in the bisected aquarium, two experiments were performed both before and alter the washing collection period. In the first, males were secured in the aquarium. A dye was then added to one chamber and the other checked visually after 1 h (Figure 1B). The aquarium was then drained and the experiment repeated, adding dye to the other chamber, checking for leakage in the other direction. In the second experiment, females, known not to release 3ketoPZS [1, 9], were placed in the aquarium and 1 mg of synthetic 3ketoPZS was introduced into one of the chambers. After 1 h, water samples were taken from both chambers and analyzed for 3ketoPZS by ELISA [9]. Again, the aquarium was drained 21 and the experiment repeated, adding synthetic 3ketoPZS to the other side, checking for leakage in the other direction. Behavioral assays on water taken from the anterior and posterior regions of spermiating males The sex pheromone released by spermiating males induces preference and search behaviors from ovulating females [1, 10]. Therefore, we measured these two types of characteristic behavioral responses from ovulating females to chemical stimuli from the anterior and posterior regions of spermiating males using the identical apparatus and protocols developed in the previous studies [1, 10]. Briefly, preference behavior was the amount of time spent in either side of a two-choice maze, while search behavior was the amount of time spent swimming at the head of either side of a two-choice maze. In each test, the behavior of a single female was video recorded before and after the introduction of washings from either the anterior or posterior regions of spermiating males into the odor chamber of the side of the maze chosen randomly by the toss of a coin. Because the same females were used to test both washings, the order of washing presentation was also randomized. The washings were delivered at 75 ml/min using a peristaltic pump. Tests were conducted between 0700 and 1700 in water temperatures that ranged from 12 °C to 24 °C. Preference and search behaviors were scored by naive observers and the data analyzed with a two-tailed Wilcoxon signed rank test [1, 10, 11]. 22 Electro-olfactographic recordings on water from the anterior and posterior regions of spermiating males Synthetic and natural 3ketoPZS induce strong electro-olfactographic (EOG) responses from adult female sea lampreys [1], as does water conditioned by spermiating male sea lampreys [10, 12]. Using EOG recording on females, we determined the olfactory potency of washings from the anterior and posterior regions and the whole body of spermiating males and established concentration-response relationships, according to established procedures [10, 13]. For each recording, a 10'5 M L-arginine standard was pulsed into the olfactory epithelium of a female and the EOG response measured to establish a baseline of electrical activity. Next, blank control water was introduced and the response measured to confirm the absence of odorants from the clean water source used to perfuse the olfactory epithelium (and also to mix the test odorants). Increasing concentrations of test odorants (starting at 106 dilution) were then introduced and the responses measured. Measuring the response to the L-arginine standard and blank controls concluded each trial. The epithelium of each female was allowed to recover for at least 3 min between stimuli and each concentration of an odorant was tested at least twice on a female. The magnitude of EOG responses was measured [14] and expressed as a percentage of the L-arginine standard [13]. Mass spectrometry analysis of water and urine from spermiating males Methanol extracts of washings (l L) taken from the anterior and posterior regions of spermiating males were dried down under a stream of oxygen-free nitrogen gas at 23 45°C, reconstituted in chloroform and subjected to fast atom bombardment mass spectrometry (FAB MS, 10KV) in both negative and positive ionization modes. To determine whether 3ketoPZS was present in the urine, spermiating males were anesthetized with an MS-222 solution and a catheter was inserted into the urogenital pore [15]. Urine was collected into a 50 ml container that was emptied periodically and stored at -80°C until analysis. The urine was passed through a Sep-Pak and the eluate dried down and subjected to FAB MS as described previously. ELISA of 3ketoPZS The procedure for ELISA of 3ketoPZS has been described [9]. The antibody shows 100% cross reaction with 7d, 12a, 24-trihydroxy-50t-cholan-3-one (3 keto- petromyzonol, 3kPZ) and 7a, l2a-trihydroxy-5a-cholan-3—one-24-oic acid (3 keto- allocholic acid, 3kACA). However, the former was not found in washing extracts from spermiating males [9] and the latter was present at a ratio of only 1:25 (3kACA:3ketoPZS; [16]). The anterior and posterior washings from spermiating males were diluted 1:25 with assay buffer before ELISA. ELISA was also carried out on water collected directly from the gills of spermiating males. To do this, a male was anesthetized with metomidate hydrochloride (Syndel, Vancouver, BC, Canada), immobilized with gallamine triethiodide (Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, MO), and placed in a flow-through trough. Water flowed through the mouth and exited the gills at an average rate of 431 ml/min. Water was pipetted directly off the gills and placed into a beaker every three minutes for 0.5 h, 24 making a total of 10 individual samples for each spermiating male. Parts of each sample were stored at -80°C, and 100 ml of each sample were extracted using a Sep-Pak, and the eluate was also stored at -80°C until ELISA analysis. Hourly release rates of 3ketoPZS were calculated for the anterior region washings and water collected directly from the gills. For the anterior washings, the 3ketoPZS level of water was multiplied by the total volume used in the anterior portion of the aquarium (7 L). For water collected directly from the gills, the average 3ketoPZS level of water for each spermiating male was multiplied by the flow of water across the gills (431 ml/min) and then by 60 min. Immunocytochemistry for 3ketoPZS in the gills and liver of male sea lampreys Five spermiating and seven prespermiating males were killed with an overdose of MS-222. The gills and liver were removed, immersed in either Zamboni’s fixative (2% paraformaldehyde and 1.2% saturated picric acid in 0.1 M phosphate buffer [PB]) or 4% paraformaldehyde (in PB) and stored at 4°C. As the male pheromone is a steroidal lipid, whole gill filaments were mounted to minimize the loss of cellular lipids [17]. Each gill pouch was placed under a dissection microscope, and single gill filaments were removed. Throughout the immunostaining procedure, the gill filaments were agitated mildly at 4°C. The single gill filaments were rinsed 3 times over 1 h with either PB or with PB plus 0.1% Triton X-100 (PB-TX) for 30 min. The omission of Triton-X from the immunostaining protocol served to assist in keeping the cellular membranes and lipid- containing subcellular structures intact. Nonspecific binding was blocked with 5% 25 normal goat serum in PB for 20 min, drained off and exchanged for primary antibody (from four rabbits: codes 184, 185, 286, 285 [9]) diluted with 0.1 M PB or 0.1 M PB-TX (1:1000 to 1:5000) and incubated for 24 h. The tissue was then rinsed three times over 1 h with 0.1M PB, followed by a 3-h incubation in Alexa 488 goat anti-rabbit IgC, which excites at 488 nm (1:100; Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR); rinsed; and mounted in glycerol or viewed directly with a 40X water immersion lens. Following immunostaining, some filaments were sectioned with a vibratome (Leica Microsystems, Wetzlarrn, Germany) to allow for viewing of the interplatelet region. The immunostained filament was embedded in 5% agarose (American Bioanalytical, Natick, MA) and sectioned at a thickness of 150 um. All preparations were viewed using a BioRad 1024 Confocal Microscope (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA) with the following settings: laser power, 10%; iris, 1.5 mm; gain, 1000X; black level, 0. Fixed liver samples were embedded in 5% agarose, sectioned using a vibratome at a thickness of 200 um, and stained for 3ketoPZS by the procedure used for the gill whole mounts (see previous discussion). Liver samples were viewed with a 60X oil immersion lens using the same settings. A preadsorption control experiment was conducted using a 10-fold molar excess, relative to IgC concentration, of antigen (3ketoPZS) to antibody dilution. The 3ketoPZS/antibody mixture was incubated for 24 h at 4°C, with mild agitation, then centrifuged at 100,000 g for 30 min (Sorvall RC M120 GX, Kendro, Asheville, NC). The supernatant was used in place of the primary antibody in the previously described immunocytochemical protocol. The preadsorption control did not contain any immunostaining. Negative controls were also conducted using preimmune sera for antisera from rabbits 184 and 185 [16]. Tissues processed with these preimmune sera 26 were unstained. In addition, a control with the primary antibody omitted was included in each experiment. Electron microscopic analysis of gill tissues The gill tissues from spermiating and prespermiating male sea lampreys were fixed in buffered 2.5% glutaraldehyde, and then in 1% 0504. After dehydration, fixed tissues were embedded in Spurtol resin. Ultrathin sections (90 nm) were cut, and then stained with uranyl acetate and lead citrate. The sections were examined in Philips CM10 electron microscope. 27 RESULTS Dye tests (n = 2) and ELISA measurements of water spiked with 3ketoPZS (n = 2) revealed that there was no detectable exchange of water between the two chambers of the bisected aquarium (data not shown). The total time spent and the time spent searching in each side of the two-choice maze before odorant introduction showed that ovulating females were not biased to either side (Student t-test, P > 0.10; data not shown). When water from the anterior region of spermiating males was introduced into the maze, ll of 14 ovulating females spent more of their total time (Wilcoxon signed rank test, P < 0.01) and six of seven spent more time searching (Wilcoxon signed rank test, P < 0.01) in the side to which the water was introduced. There were no significant increases or decreases in total time spent (seven of 14; Wilcoxon signed rank test, P > 0.10; n = 14) or time spent searching (two of seven; Wilcoxon signed rank test, P > 0.10; n = 7) in the experimental side of the maze when the posterior region water was introduced. In EOG experiments, the mean response to 10'5 M L-arginine was 0.5 mV (SE = 0.09 mV; n = 6). The anterior region washings (n = 6) of spermiating males were far more potent than those of the posterior region (11 = 5) at equivalent dilutions (Figure 2), but were equipotent to those from whole spermiating males (11 = 6). The detection threshold for the posterior region washings was approximately 1:100 (v/v), whereas that for the anterior region and whole-body chemical stimuli was approximately 1:10,000 (v/v). 28 500 ' 400 ‘ 300 ‘ 200 e 100 " Response (% L-arginine standard) Log dilution Figure 2. Electro-olfactogram responses of female sea lampreys to washings collected from the anterior (filled diamonds; n = 6), posterior (filled triangles; n = 5), and whole body (open circles; n = 6) of spermiating males. Responses are expressed as a percentage of the response to a 10'5 M L-arginine standard. Vertical bars represent one standard error. 29 Negative FAB MS analyses showed that the most abundant ion in extracts of water from the anterior region of spermiating males was at m/z 471 (n = 6; Figure 3A), the same as synthetic 3ketoPZS [1]. At positive mode, the base peak was at m/z 473. FAB MS detected only trace amounts of this molecule in the extracts of water from the posterior regions (11 = 6, Figure BB) and in extracts of spermiating male urine (n = 4, data not shown). The mean concentration of immunoreactive 3ketoPZS in water collected from the anterior regions of spermiating males was 54 ng/ml (n = 13) whereas that from the posterior regions was 0.8 11ng (n = 13). On average, the total release rate of the anterior region was 378 ug/h (Figure 4). Also, immunoreactive 3ketoPZS was found in water collected directly off the gills of five spermiating males; however, these concentrations showed considerable variation (Figure 4). On average, the release rate of 3ketoPZS estimated from water collected directly off the gills was 308 pg/h. There was no significant difference between release rates estimated from the anterior region water and gill water (Stundent t-test, P > 0.10). The gill filaments were comprised of gill platelets (lamellae, Figure 5A) covered by low cuboidal platelet cells, with cuboidal to columnar shaped cells in interplatelet regions. In prespermiating males, the pheromone immunoreactivity was weak and diffuse on the platelet surface and granular in interplatelet epithelial cells (Antibody 286; Figure 5A-C). In gill tissue from spermiating males, subpopulations of platelet cells were strongly immunoreactive to the pheromone antibodies (antibody 185; Figure 5D and E). This staining was absent from the nucleus (Figure 5E, 6A). Both platelet and inter- platelet epithelial cells contained supranuclear regions that were intensely 30 50- 40- 30' 20‘ 10- Relative abundance (%) 400 Relative abundance (%) 471 Figure 3. Representative fast atom bombardment mass spectrometry analyses of extracts from the anterior (A) and posterior (B) regions of spermiating males. The most abundant ion in anterior extracts was at m/z 471, the same as the male sex pheromone and synthetic 3ketoPZS. Posterior extracts contained only trace amounts of this ion. 31 0 I r ———_‘ Anterior Gills Posterior Figure 4. Mean release rate of 3ketoPZS estimated from washings collected from anterior and posterior regions as well as directly from the gills of spermiating male sea lampreys. Vertical bars, one standard deviation. 32 Figure 5. Confocal microscopy of pheromone immunocytochemistry against gill platelets from prespermiating (A-C) and spermiating (D and E) male lampreys. A and D) Low- power images; scale bar shown in A is 100 um. B,C, and E) High-power images; scale bar shown in B is 15 pm. All are images of scans in a single Z plane. B and C) the interplatelet region sectioned following immunostaining from a single field of view. B was collected at 488 nm illumination, and the immunostaining is on the platelet surface along the basal region of the platelet. C was collected through transmitted light detection of bright-field microscopy. 33 Figure 6. Subcellular localization of pheromone immunostaining. A-C) The interplatelet region of a spermiating male gill filament sectioned following immunostaining; scale bar shown in A is 15 pm. A and B) A single field of view. A is viewed at 488 nm and B through bright-field microscopy. C) Immunoreactivity in the supranuclear region of epithelial cells in the interplatelet epithelium. D and E) Pheromone immunoreactivity in the platelet and interplatlet regions following lipid solubilization with 0.1% Triton-X100; scale bar shown in D is 100 um. 34 immunoreactive to the pheromone antibodies (antibody 286; Figure 6A-C). These immunopositive cells were cuboidal along the platelet base regions (Figure 6A) and columnar in the interplatelet regions (Figure 6C). In all samples, pheromone immunoreactivity was stronger and clearer when Triton-X was omitted from immunostaining procedure than in samples treated with Triton-X (antibody 185; Figure 6D and E). The fact that the immunoreactivity decreased and blurred following treatment with the lipid solubilizing detergent is consistent with the lipid nature of the pheromone. Transmission electron microscopy of the gill epithelial cells revealed low microvillar cuboidal platelet cells (Figure 7A) with small electron lucent vesicles, larger electron opaque granules (0.3 pm), round mitochondria, rough and smooth endoplasmic reticulum, and Golgi apparatus. In the basal platelet region and the interplatelet region, the cuboidal cells (Figure 7B) had a dome-shaped apical surface, smooth endoplasmic reticulum, rough endoplasmic reticulum, electron dense vesicles, dense core vesicles, and electron lucent vesicles. The supranuclear region of low columnar interplatelet cells (Figure 7C) contained electron opaque granules and smooth endoplasmic reticulum. The perinuclear cytoplasm of interplatelet cells (Figure 7D) contained granules of varying sizes and electron density and numerous vesicular and tubular cistemae of smooth endoplasmic reticulum. These ultrastructural characteristics Show that these cells are active in lipid metabolism and store secretory products. In spermiating male liver, the immunostaining (antibody 285) was strong and diffuse in hepatocyte cytoplasm, and strong in widespread cytoplasmic granules (Figure 8A). The liver of pre-spermiating males displayed pheromone immunoreacitivity 35 Figure 7. Transmission electron microscopy of gill platelets from a spermiating male. A- C are the same magnification; scale bar in A is 0.5 pm. A) A low microvillar platelet cell. These cells contain small electron lucent vesicles (thin arrows), large electron opaque granules (short thick arrows), and smooth endoplasmic reticulum (sER). B) A cuboidal cell from the basal region of the interplatelet region has a dome-shaped apical surface, rough endoplasmic reticulum (rER), Golgi apparatus (G), electron dense vesicles (arrow), dense core vesicles (dcv), and electron lucent vesicles (elv). C) The supranuclear cytoplasm of an interplatelet cell contains electron opaque granules (arrows) and smooth endoplasmic reticulum (sER). D) The perinuclear cytoplasm of an interplatelet cell with granules of varying sizes and electron density (arrows) and tubular cistemae of smooth endoplasmic reticulum (sER); scale bar in D is 1 pm. 36 Figure 8. Pheromone immunostaining in the liver of spermiating (A) and prespermiating (B) mal sea lampreys; scale bar in A is 50 um. Both images were acquired using a X60 oil immersion objective with the same laser power, gain, iris diameter constant, and black level to avoid artifacts from differences in exposure and settings. 37 (antibody 285) that was weak and diffirse, with scattered intensely stained cytoplasmic granules (Figure 8B). Therefore, the pheromone is present in higher levels in the spermiating male liver than in the liver of the prespermiating male. 38 DISCUSSION The data from the present study clearly support our hypothesis that the male sex pheromone 3ketoPZS is released through gills, most likely via the glandular cells that appear in the gills of spermiating males. The first subhypothesis, that 3ketoPZS is released almost exclusively from the anterior portion of spermiating males, is unequivocally supported by data from our behavioral assays, EOG recording, ELISA and mass spectrometry analyses. In the two-choice maze, washings collected from the anterior regions of spermiating males induced in ovulating females the preference and search behaviors that are characteristic of those induced by 3ketoPZS [1] whereas the washings from the posterior region did not. This is corroborated by electrophysiological results that the anterior region water is equipotent to the whole body water in stimulating the female olfactory organ and is about 100 times more potent than the posterior region water. Chemically, both ELISA and mass spectrometry indicate that 3ketoPZS is present in large amounts in the anterior region water samples but in negligible amounts in the posterior region water and urine samples. These results confirm and expand on the previous ELISA results that the anterior region washings contain large amounts of 3ketoPZS [9]. The EOG and ELISA data also indicate that the 3ketoPZS released from the gills accounts for all the 3ketoPZS released by the whole animal, supporting the second subhypothesis. The anterior region washings induce EOG responses at virtually the same magnitude as the whole washings did over a range of dilutions that spans four orders of magnitude. The average release rate from the anterior region, 378 jig/h, is close to the 39 previously reported whole body release rate of c. 500 pg/h [9]. Most importantly, the washings collected directly from the gills contain large amounts of 3ketoPZS (~308 ug-h' '), which can account for the majority of the 3ketoPZS release estimated from the washings collected from the anterior region. These results support the gill-release hypothesis set forth in our previous study [1]. Finally, our third subhypothesis is clearly supported by immunocytochemical experiments that show the presence of 3ketoPZS in cells of both the liver and gills. It appears likely that the pheromone, a sulfate- and ketone- containing bile acid derivative, moves into the water from the platelet and interplatelet cells of spermiating males. Diffuse immunolabeling on the surface of platelet cells of both stages may be due to the secreted pheromone adhering to the cell surface of these cells. The localization of pheromone immunoreactive granules in the interplatelet cells of prespermiating males suggests that pheromone-containing cells in the platelet epithelium first appear in the interplatelet region during the prespermiating phase and then only in the platelet region during spermiation. It is likely that 3ketoPZS is at least a part of the “substance of sexual significance” [7]. Our results clearly implicate the involvement, but do not illustrate the explicit role of hepatocytes in biosynthesis of 3ketoPZS. The granules with strong pheromone immunoreactivity demonstrate that hepatocytes contain either 3ketoPZS, 3kACA, or 3kPZ, or all of them because the primary antibody used for immunocytochemical staining cross-reacts with all three of these compounds. This conforms with the discovery that PZS, a larval bile acid, is produced in the liver [5] and that liver is the exclusive organ for bile acid synthesis [18]. It is possible that 3ketoPZS is synthesized in the liver, released 40 into circulation, and taken up by the platelet and interplatelet cells. Alternatively, the gill cells may take up a precursor synthesized in the liver and modify it into 3ketoPZS. Smooth endoplasmic reticulum, a subcellular site for steroid synthesis is widespread in the platelet and interplatelet cells. Granules of varying electron density that are prominent in transmission electron micrographs may be the site of the granular localization of pheromone immunoreacitivity of the interplatelet cells. Large lipid structures with electron lucent centers, previously observed in Type I male glandular cells of river lamprey fixed in osmium tetroxide [8], were absent from sea lamprey. This difference may be due to the differing fixation protocols, with stabilizing aldehyde prefixation being included in the present study but absent from the earlier study. In bony fishes, all pheromones identified to date are steroids or prostaglandins - or sulfated or glucuronidated forms of these compounds [19-22]. In the case of free steroids, there is evidence that they, like the lamprey pheromone, are mainly excreted into the water via the gills [23, 24]. However, the mechanism whereby they do so appears to be passive diffusion [23, 25]. There is no evidence for specialized cells such as those that we have demonstrated in lampreys. The release rates of free steroids by bony fishes are also considerably lower than those of 3ketoPZS by spermiating lampreys [1, 26]. In contrast to free steroids, sulfated steroids in teleosts and elasmobranches do not pass through the gills [23, 25]. Their main site of release appears to be the urinary bladder [15, 24]. Although the urinary bladder has been thought as a source of sex pheromones in the sea lamprey [27], none has yet been firmly identified. The main reason for making these comparisons between vertebrate classes is to underline our belief the 41 mechanism whereby male sea lampreys release 3ketoPZS is an active one, with the specialized cells that appear in the gill epithelium of spermiating males as “pumps.” To rely on gills to broadcast 3ketoPZS possibly represents the evolution of a system mainly to extend the active space of the pheromone signal. Such a system would certainly be advantageous for spermiating male lampreys, which construct nests in sites where water flows at 0.5 to 1.5 m/sec [28, 29] and probably have to rely heavily on this pheromone to attract ovulating females from downstream [1, 27]. Bile acids, and their sulfate esters such as 3ketoPZS, are produced in large quantities by hepatocytes of vertebrates [18]. The transportation of 3ketoPZS from liver to gills is potentially very efficient because, in the lamprey, hepatic veins carry blood directly to the heart and all blood from the heart passes immediately through the gills [30]. It has been estimated that in a 100-g river lamprey, the relative area of the gills is 600 m2/ g [31]. If the relative surface area in the sea lamprey were similar, its gills would provide an enormous surface area with specialized glandular cells, through which the respiratory activity generates continuous flow to facilitate exchange of the pheromone molecule with the environment. In conclusion, our experiments demonstrate that the spermiating male sea lamprey sex pheromone, 3ketoPZS, is released through the gills. Although liver and glandular cells are clearly implicated in the production and release of 3ketoPZS, their explicit roles need to be examined at the molecular level to elucidate the mechanistic processes whereby this pheromone molecule is produced and released. 42 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS We thank the staffs of U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Marquette Biological Station, Marquette, MI and the U. S. Geological Survey, Hammond Bay Biological Station, Millersburg, M1 for collecting sea lampreys and providing space to conduct experiments for this study; Dolly Trump and Lydia Lorenz for the use of their private land to conduct behavioral experiments; Andrea Belanger for her assistance with immunocytochemistry; Sally Burns for her assistance with electron microscopy; and Beverly Chamberlin for her assistance with mass spectrometry. 43 10. 11. REFERENCES . Li W, Scott AP, Siefltes MJ, Yan HG, Liu Q, Yun SS, Gage DA. Bile acid secreted by male sea lamprey that acts as a sex pheromone. Science 2002; 296:138-141. Haslewood G. The properties of bile salts in the aquatic environment. In Chemoreception in studies of marine pollution. Reports from a workshop at Oslo, July 13 and 14, 1980. Norway Marine Pollution Research Monitoring Programme no. 1; 1983:24-26. . Sacquet E, Lesel R, Mejean C, Riottot M, Leprince C. Absence of bacterial conversion of bile acids in the rainbow trout, Salmo gairdneri. Ann Biol Anim Bioch 1979; A19:385-391. Haslewood GA, TOkés L. Comparative studies of bile salts: bile salts of the lamprey Petromyzon marinas L. Biochem J 1969; 114(2):l79-l84. Polkinghome CN, Olson JM, Gallaher DG, Sorensen PW. Larval sea lamprey release two unique bile acids to the water at a rate sufficient to produce detectable riverine pheromone plumes. Fish Physiol Biochem 2001; 24:15-30. Yamamoto K, Sargent PA, Fisher MM, Youson JH. Periductal fibrosis and lipocytes (fat-storing cells or ito cells) during biliary atresia in the lamprey. Hepatology 1986; 6(1):54-59. Morris R. Some aspects of the structure and cytology of the gills of Lampetra fluviatilis. Q J Microsc Sci 1957; 98(4):473-485. Pickering AD, Morris R. Sexual dimorphism in the gills of the spawning river lamprey, Lampetrafluviatilis L. Cell Tissue Res 1977; 180:1-10. Yun SS, Sieflces MJ, Scott AP, Li W. Development and application of an ELISA for a sex pheromone released by male sea lampreys (Petromyzon marinas L.). Gen Comp Endocrinol 2002; 129(3): 163-170. Sieflces MJ, Bergstedt RA, Twohey MB, Li W. Chemosterilization of male sea lampreys does not affect sex pheromone release. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 2003; 60:23-31. Rao PV. Statistical Research Models in the Life Sciences. Pacific Grove, California: Brooks /Cole Publishing Co; 1998: 169-202. 44 l2. l3. 14. 15. l6. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. Bjerselius R, Li W, Sorensen PW, Scott AP. Spermiated male sea lamprey release a potent sex pheromone. In: Thomas P, Goetz F (eds.), Proceedings of the filth international symposium on the reproductive physiology of fish. Austin, Texas: 1996: 271. Li W, Sorensen PW, Gallaher DG. The olfactory system of migratory adult sea lamprey (Petromyzon marinas) is specifically and acutely sensitive to unique bile acids released by conspecific larvae. J Gen Physiol 1995; 105:569-587. Getchell TV. Electrogenic sources of slow voltage transients recorded from frog olfactory epithelium. J Neurophysiol. 1974; 37:1115-1130. Scott AP, Liley NR. Dynamics of excretion of 17a,20[3-dihydroxy 4-pregnen-3- one 20-sulfate, and of the glucuronides of testosterone and l7B-estradiol, by urine of reproductively mature male and female rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). J Fish Biol 1994; 44:117-129. Yun S-S, Scott AP, Li W. Pheromones of the male sea lamprey, Petromyzon marinus L: structural studies on a new compound, 3-keto allocholic acid, and 3- keto petromyzonol sulfate. Steroids; In press. Beltz BS, Burd GD. Immunocytochemical Techniques: Principles and Practice, Blackwell Scientific Publications; 1989. Padmanabhan, N. 1971. The bile acids; chemistry, physiology, and metabolism. Plenum Press, New York. Liley NR, Stacey NE. Hormones, pheromones and reproductive behavior. In: Hoar WS, Randall DG, Donaldson EM (eds.), Fish Physiology. vol. IX Reproduction Part B Fertility Control. New York: Academic Press; 1983: 1-49. Stacey NE, Cardwell JR, Liley NR, Scott AP, Sorensen PW. Hormones as sex pheromones in fish. In: Davey KG, Peter RE, Tobe SS (eds.), Perspectives in Comparative Endocrinology. National Research Council of Canada, Ottawa; 1994: 438-448. Scott AP, Vermeirssen ELM. Production of conjugated steroids by teleost gonads and their role as pheromones. In: Davey KG, Peter RE, Tobe SS (eds.), Perspectives in Comparative Endocrinology. National Research Council of Canada, Ottawa; 1994: 645-654. Stacey NE, Cardwell JR. Hormonally-derived pheromones in fish: new approaches to controlled reproduction. In: F ingerman M, Nagabhushanam R, Thompson M-F (eds.), Recent Advances in Marine Biotechnology. Oxford-IBH Publ; 1997: 407-454. 45 23. 24. 25. 26. 27. 28. 29. 30. 31. Vermeirssen EL, Scott AP. Excretion of free and conjugated steroids in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss): evidence for branchial excretion of the maturation- inducing steroid, 17,200-dihydroxy-4-pregnen-3-one. Gen Comp Endocrinol 1996;101:180-194. Sorensen PW, Scott AP, Kihslinger RL. How common hormonal metabolites function as relatively specific pheromonal signals in the goldfish. In: Norberg B, Kjesbu OS, Taranger GL, Andersson E, Stefansson SO (eds.) Proceedings of the 6th International Symposium on Reproductive Physiology of Fish, Bergen, Norway, July 4-9, 1999. Bergen, Norway; 2000: 125-128. Maren TH, Embry R, Broder LE. The excretion of drugs across the gill of the dogfish Squalus acanthias. Comp Biochem Physiol 1968; 26:853-864. Scott AP, Sorensen PW. Time-course of release of pheromonally active gonadal steroids and their conjugates by ovulatory goldfish. Gen Comp Endocrinol 1994; 96(2):309-323. Teeter J. Pheromone communication in sea lamprey (Petromyzon marinus): implications for population management. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 1980; 37:2123- 2132. Applegate VC. Natural history of the sea lamprey (Petromyzon marinus) in Michigan. US Fish Wildl Serv Spec Sci Rep Fish Serv no 55; 1950. Hanson LH, Manion PJ. Sterility method of pest control and its potential role in an integrated sea lamprey (Petromyzon marinas) control program. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 1980; 37:2108-2117. Olson KR. The cardiovascular system. In: Evans DH (eds.), The Physiology of Fishes. Boca Raton, Florida: CRC Press; 1998: 129-154. Wikgren B. Osmotic regulation in some aquatic animals with special reference to the influence of temperature. Acta 2001 F ennica 1953; 71:102. 46 CHAPTER 2 ELECTROPHYSIOLOGICAL EVIDENCE FOR DETECTION AND DISCRIMINATION OF PHEROMONAL BILE ACIDS BY THE OLFACTORY EPITHELIUM OF FEMALE SEA LAMPREYS (Petromyzon marinas) Siefltes, M.J. and Li, W. In press. Electrophysiological evidence for detection and discrimination of pheromonal bile acids by the olfactory epithelium of female sea lampreys (Petromyzon marinus). Joum_al of Compafltive Physiology A. 47 ABSTRACT Electro-olfactograms were used to determine sensitivity and specificity of olfactory organs of female sea lampreys (Petromyzon marinas) to four bile acids: 3-keto petromyzonol sulfate and 3-keto allocholic acid from spermiating males and petromyzonol sulfate and allocholic acid from larvae. Spermiating male bile acids are thought to function as a mating pheromone and larval bile acids as a migratory pheromone. The response threshold was 10‘12 M for 3-keto petromyzonol sulfate and 10’ '0 M for the other bile acids. At concentrations above 10'9 M, the sulfated bile acids showed almost identical potency, as did the non-sulfated bile acids. The two sulfated bile acids were more potent than the two non-sulfated ones. In addition, 3-keto petromyzonol sulfate and water conditioned with spermiating males induced similar concentration- response curves and response thresholds. Cross adaptation experiments demonstrated that the sulfated and non-sulfated bile acids represent different odors to the olfactory epithelium of females. Further exploration revealed that 3-keto petromyzonol sulfate represents a different odor than petromyzonol sulfate, while 3-keto allocholic acid and allocholic acid represent the same odor. Results indicate that male-specific bile acids are potent and specific stimulants to the female olfactory organ, supporting the previous hypothesis that these bile acids function as a pheromone. 48 INTRODUCTION Bile acids are potent stimulants for both the gustatory and olfactory systems of many fish species (Hara 1994, Li et al. 1995; Michel and Lubomudrov 1995). Initially, it was proposed that the bile acids are appealing candidates for salmon pheromones due to their structural diversity and stability (Doving et al. 1980; Stabell 1987). Furthermore, electrophysiological studies demonstrated that an odotopic map of responses to bile acids and amino acids are represented in different regions of olfactory bulbs of chars (Salvelinus alpinus) and graylings ( T hymallus thymallys) (Doving et al. 1980). Behavioral studies in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) also showed that intestinal extracts, which are known to contain bile acids, induced strain-specific preference and searching behaviors (Stabell 1987). Indeed, several experiments indicated that a number of bile acids induced behavioral responses in fish (Jones and Hara 1985; Hellstrom and Doving 1986; Sola and Tosi 1993; Hara 1994). More recently, it has been shown that bile acid profiles of lake trout (Salvelinus namaycush) are largely influenced by sex and maturation stage (Zhang et al. 2001) and that bile of female rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) contains a pheromone (Vermeirssen and Scott 2001). However, no specific bile acids have been identified as pheromones in teleost fish. Recently, the sea lamprey (Petromyzon marinas) has emerged as an efficient animal model for studies of bile acids as possible pheromones because it is the only species in which specific bile acids have been linked to specific pheromone functions. Biochemical and behavioral studies have shown that sea lamprey at different life stages release specific bile acids that induce characteristic behaviors in adults (Bjerselius et al. 49 2000; Li et al. 2002). This species experiences three stages during its life cycle. The sea lamprey inhabits tributary streams during the larval stage, enters the Atlantic Ocean or large lakes (e. g. the Laurentian Great Lakes) to feed after metamorphosis into the parasitic stage and returns to streams in the adult stage to spawn and die (Hardisty and Potter 1971). Larval sea lampreys release two bile acids, petromyzonol sulfate (PZS) and allocholic acid (ACA) (Haslewood and Tokes 1969; Li et a1. 1995; Polkinghome et al. 2001; Figure 1A and B), that are potent stimulants to olfactory organs (Li et al. 1995; Li and Sorensen 1997) and induce locomotion behaviors in adults of the same species in a laboratory maze (Bjerselius et a1. 2000; Vrieze and Sorensen 2001). Furthermore, adult males, after onset of spermiation, release two bile acids, 3-keto petromyzonol sulfate (3kPZS; Li et a1. 2002; Figure 1C) and 3-keto allocholic acid (3kACA; Yun et al. 2003; Figure 1D). 3kPZS has been shown to induce increased swimming activity in ovulating females and their ultimate attraction (Li et al. 2002). The function of 3kACA has not been determined and is suspected to be a minor component of the male pheromone (Yun et al. 2003). These four bile acids present a physiological challenge for the olfactory system of adult sea lampreys that use them as possible pheromones. Sea lamprey adults spawn in rapids where current velocity typically reaches 1 m s'1 (Applegate 1950). Bile acids released by males would be rapidly diluted. Moreover, the adult male bile acids, 3kPZS and 3kACA, only differ from their larval counterparts (PZS and ACA) by having a carbonyl, as apposed to a hydroxy at carbon 3 (Figure 1). Yet larvae inhabit spawning streams year round (Moore and Schleen 1980) and release PZS and ACA when spermiating males release 3kPZS and 3kACA to attract ovulated females. It is essential 50 Figure 1. Molecular structure of sea lamprey bile acids. A) 3a, 7a, 12a, 24-tetrahydroxy- 5a-cholan-24-sulfate; Petromyzonol sulfate; PZS, B) 7a, 12a, 24-tn'hydroxy-50t-cholan- 3-one-24-sulfate; 3 keto-petromyzonol sulfate; 3kPZS, C) 3a, 7a, 12a-trihydroxy-50t- cholan-24-oic-acid; Allocholic acid; ACA, and D) 7a, 12a-dihydroxy-5a-cholan-3-one- 24-oic-acid; 3 keto-allocholic acid; 3kACA. PZS and ACA are released by larval sea lamprey and 3kPZS and 3kACA are released by spermiating male sea lampreys. Notice that PZS and 3kPZS possess a sulfate group, while ACA and 3kACA possess a carboxyl group on carbon 24. Also notice that PZS and ACA possess a hydroxyl group whereas 3kPZS and 3kACA possess a carbonyl group on carbon 3. 51 for mature female sea lampreys to be able to distinguish male bile acids from larval ones. Further, it has yet to be shown directly that 3kPZS and 3kACA stimulate the olfactory epithelium of adult females. In this study, our objectives were to determine electrophysiologically 1) the potency of 3kPZS and 3kACA to the olfactory organs of adult females, and 2) if the olfactory epithelium of females discriminates among the four bile acids. Our electrophysiological data from this study indicate that 3kPZS, demonstrated to function as a male pheromone (Li et al. 2002), represents a highly potent and distinct odor to adult female sea lampreys. 52 MATERIALS AND METHODS Experimental Fish Adult sea lampreys were collected from tributaries to lakes Huron and Michigan between April and July 2000-2002 by the staff of the US. Fish and Wildlife Service, Marquette Biological Station, Marquette, Michigan, USA. Lampreys were transported to the main laboratory at the US. Geological Survey, Hammond Bay Biological Station, Millersburg, Michigan USA. Females were separated from males and held in flow- through tanks ( 1000 L) with chilled Lake Huron water at temperatures ranging from 6°C to 8°C. Chilled water slows senescence, preserving measurable olfactory responsiveness throughout the spawning season. Test Stimuli The olfactory epithelia of female sea lampreys were exposed to solutions of L- arginine (Sigma Chemicals, St. Louis, Missouri, USA), four bile acids (ACA, PZS, 3kACA, 3kPZS; Toronto Research Chemicals, Canada; all >97% pure), and water conditioned with spermiating males (SMW). Stock solutions of bile acids were made at concentrations of 10'3 Molar (M) using de-ionized water or methanol and stored at — 20°C. A 10'2 M L-arginine standard stock solution was made with de-ionized water every week and stored at 4°C. 53 To collect SMW, males were held in flow-through tanks (200 L; 15 males per tank) with heated Lake Huron water at temperatures ranging from 15°C to 18°C. These temperatures were used to promote spermiation. Males were checked for spermiation according to the criteria set forth by Siefkes et al. (2003a). Water was conditioned with spermiating male sea lampreys by holding individual males for 4 h in polyethylene buckets filled with 10 L of Lake Huron water. These buckets were aerated and kept in a water bath of 18°C. The SMW were either used immediately in or stored at -80°C for electro-olfactographic analyses. The SMW were measured for 3kPZS concentration using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA; Yun et al. 2002), but were not measured for the other bile acids used in this study or for any other compounds. Electro-olfactogram recording procedure The same source of Lake Huron water was used to maintain the animal, collect male lamprey odor, dilute bile acids, and perfuse the naris during recording. Female sea lampreys were tested for olfactory sensitivity to the four bile acids and SMW described above. Electro-olfactogram (EOG) recording was performed as described by Li et al. (1995). Briefly, sea lampreys were anesthetized with an intramuscular injection of metomidate hydrochloride (3 mg kg'1 body weight; Syndel, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada), immobilized with an intramuscular injection of gallamine triethiodide (150 mg kg'1 body weight; Sigma, St Louis, Missouri, USA) and placed in a water-filled trough. The head of the female remained above the water and the gills were supplied with aerated water. The olfactory lamellae were then exposed and perfused with 54 water. Differential electrical potential between the skin surface and the sensory epithelia in response to each test stimulus were recorded using two Ag/AgCl electrodes (type EH- 18, World Precision Instruments, Sarasota, Florida, USA) filled with 3 M potassium chloride and bridged with 8% gelatin:0.9% saline — filled glass capillary tubes. The recording electrode was placed between two lamellae and was adjusted to maximize the response to the L-arginine standard while minimizing the response to a blank water control when the reference electrode was placed on the skin near the naris. Electrical signals were amplified and digitized by a Power Lab (ADI Instruments, Castle Hill, NSW 2154, Australia) and displayed on a computer. Concentration-response relationships Stock solutions of odors were diluted in Lake Huron water immediately before testing. To determine concentration-response relationships, a 10'5 M L-arginine standard was introduced into the olfactory epithelium of a female for 5 seconds and the E06 response measured to establish a reference of electrical activity (Li et al. 1995). Next blank water control was introduced and the response measured to confirm the absence of response from the water supply. Increasing concentrations of bile acids starting at 10'13 M and SMW were then introduced and the responses measured. Measuring the response to the L-arginine standard and blank water control again at the end of the dilution series concluded each trial. The epithelium of each female was allowed to recover for at least 3 min between stimuli, and each concentration of the test stimuli was assayed at least twice. 55 EOG response magnitudes from females were measured in mV and expressed as a percentage of the response to the L-arginine standard. Cross adaptation Cross adaptation, developed by Caprio and Byrd (1984), was used to compare the EOG response to a test stimulus before and during adaptation to an adapting compound using a protocol by Li and Sorensen (1997). In a given trial, baseline olfactory EOG responses of females to blank water control (Control A), an L-arginine standard and test stimuli (SMW and all four bile acids; ‘Initial Response’) were recorded. The test stimuli were used at concentrations that elicited approximately equipotent olfactory responses at about 100% of the L-arginine standard. During adaptation, the olfactory epithelium of a female was continually exposed to the adapting stimulus for 5 min after which a 5 second application of the same adapting stimulus was tested, first at the concentration used in the adaptation (‘Control B’) and then at twice the concentration used for the adaptation (‘Self-adapted Control’). Then the other test stimuli were tested in the adapting solution (‘Adapted Response’). Each test was interspersed with 5 second applications of the L- arginine standard and Control B to confirm the responsiveness of the female. Switching the adapting stimulus back to blank water completed the trial. The epithelium of the female was allowed to recover for 30 min and then the female was tested again using another adapting stimulus. Cross adaptation data were expressed as Percent Initial Response (PIR) using the following formula adapted from Caprio and Byrd (1984) and Li and Sorensen (1997), 56 R _ (Adapted Response — Control B) X (Initial Response — Control A) 100 where a larger PIR indicates less cross-reactivity between olfactory receptor mechanisms or separate receptor sites and a low PIR indicates more cross reactivity or shared receptor sites and/or a common signal transduction pathway. Statistical analysis Statistical analysis system (SAS) was used to conduct all analyses. In concentration-response experiments, responses were visually compared. The lowest concentration at which a stimulus elicited a response larger than the blank water control (Student’s t-test) was considered to be its response threshold. In cross adaptation experiments, a paired t-test was used to determine if responses to a test stimulus during adaptation were significantly different than the responses to the same test stimulus before adaptation. All PIR data were subsequently analyzed to directly detect cross-reactivity by subjecting all PIR data to a two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). If the main effect was found to be significant, the PIR data was divided into five groups according to adapting stimulus. For each group, responses of adapted epithelia to test stimuli were analyzed by a one-way ANOVA to determine the affect of the adapting stimulus. Again, if the main effect was significant, the significance of the adapting effect for each test stimulus was determined by comparing all PIRS in the group with the PIR of the self-adapted control using Dunnett’s test, which tests for differences between several treatments and a single control. 57 The following categories were used to classify cross adaptation responses; 1) not adapted, meaning responses during adaptation were not significantly different from the initial response (paired t-test, P>0.05); 2) partially adapted, meaning responses during adaptation were significantly less than the initial responses (paired t-test, P<0.05), but the PIR were significantly greater than the control (Dunnett’s, P<0.05); and 3) adapted to control levels, meaning PIR were not significantly different than the control (Dunnett’s, P>0.05). 58 RESULTS All chemicals tested were stimulatory to the olfactory epithelium of female sea lampreys. The mean response to the L-arginine standard was 0.859 :E 0.04 mV (mean i SE). Concentration-response relationships of the four bile acids were plotted together as percentages of the L-arginine standard (Figure 2A). All responses to bile acids ranged from —9 % to 640 %, and the blank water control elicited a mean response of 7.9 i 6.5 % (mean i SE). 3kPZS and PZS had similar concentration-response curves that were exponential in shape with steep slopes between 10"0 and 10"5 M. The response threshold, or the lowest concentration that elicited a response Significantly greater than the blank water control, for 3kPZS was 10'12 M (31.4 i 3.2 %, mean :1: SE; Student’s t-test, P<0.01; Figure 2C) and for PZS was 10'10 M (26.8 i 9.6%, mean i SE; Student’s t-test, P<0.01; Figure 2C). 3kACA and ACA had similar concentration-response curves that were linear in shape from the response threshold of 10''0 M (37.8 :L- 20.5%, mean :1: SE; Student’s t- test, P<0.01 and 30.0 i 7.5%, mean i SE; Student’s t-test, P<0.01, respectively; Figure 2C) to 10’6M, the highest concentration tested. The concentration-response curves for 3kACA and ACA were shallower than the curves generated with 3kPZS and PZS. When comparing the concentration-response curves of SMW and 3kPZS, the curve for SMW was plotted according to the concentration of 3kPZS measured in the SMW samples using ELISA (Yun et al. 2002). The concentration-response relationship of SMW had an exponential shape similar to the 3kPZS curve (Figure 23). Also, both SMW and 3kPZS had response thresholds of 10'12 M (16.2 i 3.2 %, mean i SE; Student’s t-test, P=0.05 and 31.4 i 3.2 %, mean i SE; Student’s t-test, P<0.01, 59 Figure 2. A) Semi-logarithmic plots of electro-olfactogram (EOG) concentration- responses to sea lamprey bile acids (allocholic acid, ACA; petromyzonol sulfate, PZS; 3 keto-allocholic acid, 3kACA; 3 keto-petromyzonol sulfate, 3kPZS). B) Semi- logarithmic plots of EOG concentration-responses to water conditioned with spermiating males (SMW) and 3kPZS. C and D) expanded view of responses in A and B, respectively showing response threshold concentrations. The response threshold for a given odor is the lowest concentration that elicits a response significantly greater than the control (students t-test, P<0.05). The asterisks (*) denote the response threshold of 3kPZS in C and 3kPZS and SMW in D. The carrot (A) denotes the response threshold of the other bile acids in C. Mean response magnitudes are presented as a percentage of the response elicited by a 10'5 M L-arginine standard solution. Vertical bars represent one standard error. Numbers by the abbreviations indicate sample sizes 60 P m G ’6 t- 800 - r- - § +PZCSA(‘(7;) €500 —<>— SMW (12) ‘9‘ . +3kPZS (12) a 600 - +3kACA (7) .3400 T +3kPZS (7) g 300 4 1—1 400 ‘ ..'1 g g 200 - o _, en 2 20° 2 100 - Q C a. a. E 0 I I I I E 0 # F I l I 1 -13 -12 -11 -10 -9 -8 -7 -6 -15 -14 -13 -12 -11 -10 -9 -8 Log molar concentration Log molar concentration .0 o 200 ' + ACA (7) 100 —o— SMW (12) —o— PZS (7) + 3kPZS (12) + 3kACA (7) + 3kPZS (7) Response (% E-arg standard) 6 G G J G l Response (% L-arg standard) U! 6 Con -13 -12* -11 -l0" -9 Con -13 -12* -11 Log molar concentration Log molar concentration Figure 2. 61 respectively; Figure 2D). Although the curves were similarly shaped, the SMW curve generated slightly larger responses at equivalent 3kPZS concentrations above the response threshold. The responses to the L-arginine standard did not change before and during adaptation to bile acids (Figure 3; paired t-test, P>0.10), but those to bile acids did (two- way ANOVA, P<0.01). When used as the adapting stimuli, three of the four bile acids completely adapted themselves (3kPZS, PZS and ACA; Figure 3; paired t-test, P<0.01, initial responses compared to responses during adaptation; also visually compared). Although, the response to 3kACA was significantly lower than the initial response (paired t-test, P<0.01), 3kACA appeared to not completely adapt itself (Figure 3B). The analyses revealed three patterns of cross-reactivity among the four bile acids. First, when 3kPZS was used as an adapting stimulus, the response to PZS was only partially adapted, and vice versa (Dunnett’s, P<0.05; paired t-test, P<0.01; Figure 3A and C). Second, the responses to 3kACA and ACA were not adapted to 3kPZS (paired t-test, P>0.10; Figure 3A) and only partially adapted to PZS control levels (Dunnett’s, P<0.05; paired t-test, P<0.03; Figure 3C). Similarly, responses to 3kPZS and PZS were not adapted to either 3kACA or ACA control levels (paired t-test, P>0.05; Figure 3B and D). Third, when ACA was used as an adapting stimulus, the response to 3kACA was adapted to control levels, and vice versa (Dunnett’s, P>0.05; Figure 3B and D;). When SMW was used, all bile acid stimuli were adapted to control levels (Dunnett’s, P>0.05; Figure 3E). 62 Figure 3. Results of cross-adaptation experiments, grouped by the five adapting stimuli: A) 3 keto-petromyzonol sulfate, 3kPZS; B) 3 keto-allocholic acid, 3kACA; C) petromyzonol sulfate, PZS; D) allocholic acid, ACA; E) water conditioned with spermiating males, SMW. Mean percent initial responses (PIR) are shown with horizontal lines representing one standard error. For each adapting stimulus, the response to self-adapted controls is underlined. Number symbols (#) signify that a particular test stimulus was completely adapted to control levels, meaning the test stimulus PIR was not different from the self-adapted control PIR (P>0.05, Dunnett’s test). Asterisks (*) signify that a particular test stimulus was partially adapted, meaning the test stimulus PIR was different from the self-adapted control PIR (P<0.05, Dunnett’s test), but the test stimulus response during adaptation was less than the response before adaptation (responses in mV not shown; P<0.05, paired t-test). Carrots (A) signify that a particular test stimulus was not adapted, meaning the test stimulus response during adaptation was the same as the response before adaptation (responses in mV not shown; P>0.05, paired t-test). Numbers by the bars indicate sample sizes. The numbers by the abbreviations are the logarithmic values of the molar concentrations for the tested stimuli. NT, not tested. 63 A. Adaptation to 3kPZS B. Adaptation to 3kACA -5 L-arg -5 L-arg " 4 SMW SMW NT -8 ACA -8 ACA # 3 -7 3kACA llkACA— 4 s -9 PZS .9 P25 “ Q53 saunas -9 3kPZS A is 0 50 100 150 0 50 100 150 % initial response % initial response C. Adaptation to P28 D. Adaptation to ACA -5 L-arg E A 9 -5 L-arg " 5 SMW SMW NT -8 ACA ;8_ACA 5 -7 3kACA -7 3kACA # 5 erzs .9 m A 4 -9 3kPZS * 8 -9 3kPZS " 3 0 50 100 150 0 50 100 150 % initial response % initial response E. Adaptation to SMW -5 L—arg q +14%“ 5 SM}! 3 4 : “ml—:14 #5 -73kACA‘ NT -9 P23 .34 #5 .9 3kPZS ‘34 #3 0 50 100 150 Figure 3. 64 DISCUSSION This study establishes that the olfactory organs of adult female sea lampreys are highly sensitive to and can electrophysiologically discriminate bile acids released by males and larvae of the same species. Concentration-response curves showed that both male and larval bile acids were highly stimulatory to female olfactory organs and that there was a wide range of response dynamics associated with the four tested bile acids. In the lower range of concentrations tested, the main component of the male pheromone (Li et al. 2002; Yun et al. 2002), 3kPZS, with a response threshold of 10‘12 M, was 100 times more potent than the other three bile acids, whose response thresholds were 10''0 M. This difference in potency may be advantageous and critical for 3kPZS to function as a male pheromone for two apparent reasons. First, during the spawning season, adults and larvae occupy the same streams (Moore and Schleen 1980) in which PZS and ACA are present at concentrations between 10'll and 10’12 M (Porkinghome et al. 2001), which are below the detectable concentrations by female adults. Unless the real response thresholds are lower than those determined by our EOG recording, PZS and ACA should not interfere with female detection of 3kPZS in spawning streams. Second, sea lampreys spawn in fast flowing rivers and streams where current velocity typically reaches 1 m 3" (Applegate 1950). Bile acids released by males would be quickly diluted by the large volume of water passing by the male. Even though 3kPZS is produced and released at a very high rate (ca. 0.50 mg per male per hour; Yun et al. 2002; 2003) through a highly efficient and specialized mechanism (Sieflces et al. 2003b), a low response threshold for 3kPZS would be advantageous for its pheromone function. 65 It is notable that in a previous study (Li et al. 1995), the olfactory epithelia of sea lamprey migratory adults of both sexes showed EOG responses to PZS and ACA at concentrations as low as 10'll and 10"2 M, which were lower than the 10m M determined in this study (Figure 2A), and which were similar to the concentrations measured in spawning streams (Porkinghome et al. 2001). The difference in measured response thresholds is probably due to the different animal and experimental conditions between the two studies. The animals used in Li et al. (1995) were migratory adults captured very early in their spawning migration whereas animals used in our study were often captured later in the migration. It has been shown that the EOG responsiveness of adult sea lampreys to larval bile acids gradually decreases as the spawning migration progresses (Li 1994). Furthermore, the location, water, holding tanks, odor delivery system, digitizer, and amplifier used in the study by Li et al (1995) were different from those used in this study. Nonetheless, these two studies indicate that sea lampreys are highly sensitive to bile acids released by individuals of the same species. Our cross adaptation experiments demonstrated that the olfactory epithelium of female sea lampreys electrophysiologically discriminate between different bile acids produced by males and larvae of the same species. It appears that, from the patterns of cross adaptation, 3kPZS and PZS represent different odors to the females. In contrast, 3kACA and ACA appear to represent the same odor or two very similar odors. Further, the odor of 3kACA and ACA is very different from those of 3kPZS or PZS. In other words, 3kPZS represents a unique odor among bile acids tested in this study, which may very well be another advantageous physiological feature to promote the functionality of 3kPZS as a pheromone. The distribution of lamprey larvae in streams is not random; 66 rather, it is clumped (Applegate 1950). Thus, it is possible that at certain locations the concentrations of PZS and ACA are higher than the average. Ovulating females, in search of spermiating males through the 3kPZS signal (Li et al. 2002, Siefkes et al. 2003a), may be lost in locations with concentrated larvae without the ability to discriminate 3kPZS from other conpecific bile acids. Another issue is that females also need to discriminate bile acids released by other aquatic and terrestrial animals. Li and Sorensen (1997) showed that PZS is electrophysiologically discriminated by adult lamprey from all other common animal bile acids tested. Since 3kPZS shares with PZS a combination of two molecular features (50t- configuration and a sulfate ester at carbon 24; Haslewood and Tokes 1969; Li et al. 2002), which has been found only in lamprey bile acids, it is likely that 3kPZS is also readily discriminated from bile acids of other animals. However, the direct evidence supporting this speculation can only come from direct testing using 3kPZS. There were two curious phenomena that we observed during our cross adaptation experiments. One was the apparent lack of self-adaptation when 3kACA was used as the adapting stimulus. Contamination of the 3kACA controls may explain the lack of self- adaptation, but this is unlikely as can be seen by the tight error bars around the self- adapted control (Figure 3B), the complete adaptation to ACA (Figure 3D), and the purity of the compound. Explanation may prove to be difficult. The other phenomenon is the evidence of non-reciprocal adaptation when 3kPZS and PZS are used as the adapting stimulus. It appears that PZS as an adapting stimulus partially adapts 3kPZS by around 60%, while 3kPZS partially adapts PZS only by around 40%. Whether this pattern of non-reciprocal adaptation is indicative of more receptor sites for PZS than 3kPZS has yet 67 to be determined. The lack of self-adaptation of 3kACA and the non-reciprocal adaptation of 3kPZS and PZS need to be explored further. Nonetheless, the other cross adaptation data indicate that 3kACA/ACA, 3kPZS and PZS represent different odors to females, and support the previous hypothesis that 3kPZS functions as a pheromone (Li et al. 2002). Whether 3kACA could function as a component of the male pheromone remains elusive. This compound is a potent stimulant for females (Figure 2A) and is released only by the male lamprey during spermiation (Yun et al. 2003), exactly the same condition when 3kPZS is released (Li et al. 2002). However, 3kACA is completely adapted to control levels by ACA, and vice versa. It is likely a behavioral study could conclude on its potential function as a pheromone component. EOG data from this study also implicate that a change at carbon 3 may largely influence the odor quality of bile acids. Several previous studies have clearly indicated that conjugating groups (or the lack thereof) are critical in the lack of cross adaptation of bile acids by fish olfactory epithelia. In zebrafish (Danio rerio), taurine-conjugated bile acids are more stimulatory than free or glycine-conjugated bile acids (Michel and Lubomudrov 1995). Lake char (Salvelinus namaycush) appear to have several specific olfactory receptor subtypes that distinguish between free, taurine-conjugated and carbon 3 sulfated bile acids (Zhang et al. 2001; Zhang and Hara 1994). Similarly, migratory adult sea lampreys appear to electrophysiologically discriminate free, carbon 24 taurine- conjugated, carbon 3 sulfated and carbon 24 sulfated bile acids (Li and Sorensen, 1997). All these results are corroborated by our discovery in this study that two free bile acids (ACA and 3kACA) are not completely cross-adapted by the two carbon 24 sulfated bile 68 acids (PZS and 3kPZS). In addition, it is noteworthy that our data clearly indicate that a carbon 3 carbonyl or hydroxyl, neither of which is a conjugating group, also are critical to the female lamprey olfactory epithelium in electrophysiological discrimination of conspecific bile acids. Our experiments using SMW have yielded mixed results. SMW is known to induce characteristic behavioral responses in ovulating females (Li et al. 2002) and to contain 3kPZS and 3kACA at a ratio of 25 to 1 (Li et al. 2002; Siefltes et al. 2003b; Yun et al. 2002; 2003). Corroborating with this discovery, concentration-response curves of SMW and 3kPZS were similar in shape and magnitude (Figure 2B), especially in the lower range of concentrations. It is likely that, at lower concentrations, the SMW potency is largely attributable to 3kPZS. The slightly larger response magnitudes at concentrations above 10"0 M is probably largely due to 3kACA. Presumably, SMW also contains many other compounds that might be odorous and may contain the other bile acids used in this study (Figure 3E). Previous chemical and electrophysiological studies indicated that other compounds are likely to only be present in and not likely to be stimulatory at low concentrations (Li et al. 2002; Yun et al. 2002; 2003). Further, when collected under a condition similar to that used in this study, water from spermiating males is stimulatory when diluted 106 times whereas water from pre-spermiating males is stimulatory only when diluted 102 times or less (Li et al. 1994), and the main difference between the two waters is the presence of 3kPZS and 3kACA from spermiating males (Li et al. 2002; Yun et al. 2002). Our cross adaptation experiments using SMW, however, do not clearly support the notion that 3kPZS is the only stimulatory compound in diluted SMW. When SMW 69 was used as an adapting stimulus, the response to 3kPZS was adapted to control levels, which was expected. In addition, SMW also adapted PZS and ACA to control levels, which was not expected. SMW may contain trace amounts of PZS and ACA (if any, and only at an amount that is less than 1% of that of 3kPZS; Yun et al. 2002), which is not likely to be sufficient to suppress responses to PZS and ACA at the concentrations used. This issue needs to be clarified in future experiments. In conclusion, the olfactory epithelium of adult female sea lampreys is highly sensitive to a male Specific bile acid, 3kPZS, and electrophysiologically discriminates it from other conspecific bile acids. This provides further physiological evidence to support the hypothesis that 3kPZS is a male pheromone (Li et al. 2002). It appears that in addition to conjugating groups at the carbon 3 and 24 positions, other functional groups at carbon 3 are also critical in determining the odor property of bile acids. 70 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS We thank Roger Bergstedt and the staff of US Geological Survey Hammond Bay Biological Station for accommodating us in their laboratory, and Michael Twohey and the staff of Marquette Biological Station for supplying us with sea lampreys. Dr. Sang- Seon Yun performed ELISA analysis and helped with bile acid preparation. Members of Li laboratory provided critique of an early version of this manuscript. The Great Lakes Fishery Commission financed this study. This research was approved by the Michigan State University, All University Committee on Animal Use and Care, and complied with all federal and state laws, policies, and rules for the humane use of laboratory animals in research. 71 REFERENCES Applegate VC (1950) Natural history of the sea lamprey (Petromyzon marinus) in Michigan. US Fish Wildl Serv Spec Sci Rep Fish Serv No 55 Bjerselius R, Li W, Teeter JH, Johnsen PB, Maniak PJ, Grant GC, Polkinghome CN, Sorensen, PW (2000) Direct behavioural evidence that unique bile acids released by larval sea lamprey (Petromyzon marinas) function as a migratory pheromone. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 57:557-569 Doving KB, Selset R, Thommesen G (1980) Olfactory sensitivity to bile acids in salmonid fishes. Acta Physiol Scand 108: 123-131 Caprio J, Byrd RP (1984) Electrophysiological evidence for acidic, basic, and neutral amino acid olfactory receptor sites in the catfish. J Gen Physiol 842403.422 Hara TJ (1994) The diversity of chemical stimulation in fish olfaction and gustation. Rev Fish Biol Fish 4: 1-35 Hardisty MW, Potter IC (1971) The general biology of adult lampreys. In: Hardisty MW, Potter IC (eds) The Biology of Lampreys vol. 1, Academic Press, New York, pp. 127- 206 Haslewood GA, Tokes L (1969) Comparative studies of bile salts. Bile salts of the lamprey Petromyzon marinas L. Biochem J 1 14:179-184 Hellstrom T, Doving KB (1986) Chemoreception of taurocholate in anosmic and sham- operated cod, Gadus morhua. Behav. Brain Res 21:155-162 Jones KA, Hara TJ (1985) Behavioural responses of fishes to chemical cues: results from a new bioassay. J Fish Biol 27:495-504 Li W (1994) The olfactory biology of sea lamprey (Petromyzon marinus). Ph. D dissertation. University of Minnesota, St. Paul, USA Li W, Sorensen PW, Gallaher DD (1995) The olfactory system of migratory adult sea lamprey (Petromyzon marinas) is specifically and acutely sensitive to unique bile acids released by conspecific larvae. J Gen Physiol 105:567-587 Li W, Sorensen PW (1997) Highly independent olfactory receptor sites for naturally occurring bile acids in the sea lamprey, Petromyzon marinus. J Comp Physiol A 180(4):429-43 8 Li W, Scott AP, Siefkes MJ, Yan H, Liu Q, Yun S-S, Gage DA (2002) Bile acid secreted by male sea lamprey that acts as a sex pheromone. Science 296:138-141 72 Michel WC, Lubomudrov LM (1995) Specificity and sensitivity of the olfactory organ of the zebrafish, Danio rerio. J Comp Physiol A 177:191-199 Moore HH, Schleen LP (1980) Changes in spawning runs of sea lamprey (Petromyzon marinus) in selected streams of Lake Superior after chemical control. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 37:1851-1860 Polkinghome CN, Olson JM, Gallaher DD, Sorensen PW (2001) Larval sea lamprey release two unique bile acids to the water at a rate sufficient to produce detectable riverine pheromone plumes. Fish Physiol Biochem 24:15-30 Siefkes MJ, Bergstedt RA, Twohey MB, Li W (2003a) Chemosterilization of male sea lampreys does not affect sex pheromone release. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 60:23-31 Siefltes MJ, Scott AP, Zielinski B, Yun S-S, Li W (2003b) Male sea lampreys, Petromyzon marinas L., excrete a sex pheromone from gill epithelia. Biol Reprod 69:125-132. Sola C, Tosi L (1993) Bile acids and taurine as chemical stimuli for glass eels, Anguilla anguilla: a behavioral study. Environ Biol Fishes 37:197-204 Stabell OB (1987) Intraspecific pheromone discrimination and substrate marking by Atlantic salmon parr. J Chem Ecol 13: 1625-1643 Vermeirssen ELM, Scott AP (2001) Male priming pheromone is present in bile, as well as urine, of female rainbow trout. J Fish Biol 1039-1045 Vrieze L, Sorensen PW (2001) Laboratory assessment of the role of a larval pheromone and natural stream odor in spawning stream localization by migratory sea lamprey (Petromyzon marinus). Can J Fish Aquat Sci 58:2374-2385 Yun S-S, Scott AP, Li W (2003). Pheromones of the male sea lamprey, Petromyzon marinus L: structural studies on a new compound, 3-keto allocholic acid, and 3-keto petromyzonol sulfate. Steroids 682297-304 Yun S-S, Sieflces MJ, Scott AP, Li W (2002) Development and application of an ELISA for sea lamprey male sex pheromone. Gen Comp Endocrin 129:163-170 Zhang C, Brown SB, Hara TJ (2001) Biochemical and physiological evidence that bile acids produced and released by lake char (Salvelinus namaycush) function as chemical signals. J Comp Physiol B 171: 161-171 Zhang C, Hara TJ (1994) Multiplicity of salmonid olfactory receptors for bile acids as evidenced by cross-adaptation and ligand binding assay. Chem Senses 19:579 73 CHAPTER 3 A MALE SEA LAMPREY (Petromyzon marinas) SEX PHEROMONE THAT ATTRACTS OVULATING FEMALES IN A SPAWNING STREAM 74 ABSTRACT The behavioral responses of female sea lampreys (Petromyzon marinus) in a spawning stream to water conditioned with spermiating males and the synthetic bile acid, 3-keto petromyzonol sulfate were observed. Results showed that these odorants function as a pheromone attracting only ovulating females. When released into a natural spawning stream, ovulating, but not pre-ovulating females located and swam to the source of water conditioned with spermiating males and also 10'‘2 Molar synthetic 3-keto petromyzonol sulfate. Furthermore, water conditioned with spermiating males, but not synthetic 3-keto petromyzonol sulfate induced ovulating females to remain at the site of odorant introduction for extended periods of time. In conclusion, water conditioned with spermiating males and synthetic 3-keto petromyzonol sulfate were able to influence behaviors of ovulating females in a natural environment and the lowest effective concentration of 3-keto petromyzonol sulfate that induces these behaviors is 10'12 Molar. 75 INTRODUCTION In the Laurentian Great Lakes, the sea lamprey (Petromyzon marinas) is a high profile, highly destructive invasive species, which has caused economic and ecological chaos in terms of their impact on the fish community (Smith and Tibbles 1980). Although, sea lamprey management has been active for over 50 years and includes integrated techniques such as lampricides, barriers, trapping, and sterile male releases (Klar and Young 2002), sea lampreys continue to be a significant source of mortality for large and medium sized fish in the Great Lakes (Bergstedt and Schneider 1988; Kitchell 1990). For this reason, and the fact that current control techniques have the potential to be costly and environmentally damaging (Smith and Tibbles 1980, Lamsa et al. 1980), the development of additional means of sea lamprey management needs to occur. At the first Sea Lamprey International Symposium held in 1979 (Smith 1980), it was proposed that pheromones, if identified, could be used in the management of sea lamprey populations in the Great Lakes (Teeter 1980). One technique that could be developed using sea lamprey pheromones is the use of pheromone-baited traps to remove sea lampreys before they spawn, reducing their reproductive potential. Traps baited with sex pheromones have been a common practice to control undesirable insects (Carde and Minks 1995), but similar techniques have not been applied to vertebrate pests because either the signals and their firnction have not been identified or where they have, pheromones have not been shown to attract individuals of the target sex in natural conditions or over distances great enough to be effective. 76 Recently, a sex pheromone released by spermiating male sea lamprey has been identified and its behavioral function characterized (Li et al. 2002, and reference herein). In the initial research, water conditioned with spermiating males (SMW) elicited increases in swimming behaviors and ultimately attracted ovulating females in two- choice maze behavioral assays. Chemical analyses of SMW revealed the presence of a novel compound, 7a, 12a, 24-trihydroxy 501-cholan-3-one 24-sulfate (3-keto petromyzonol sulfate or 3kPZS), a bile acid that is highly potent to the olfactory epithelium of females. This bile acid, when purified also elicited the characteristic behaviors from ovulating females in a two-choice maze. Even though the firnction of the spermiating male sex pheromone appears to be to attract females that are ready to spawn, behavioral tests were only conducted in a controlled laboratory-like setting (two-choice maze), not in a natural spawning stream environment. Also, artificially synthesized or “synthetic” 3kPZS was not used in any of the two-choice maze tests and effective concentrations of 3kPZS were not determined. To address whether SMW and synthetic 3kPZS are effective in a more natural setting and if so, at what 3kPZS concentration, we examined the following specific questions: 1) In a natural spawning stream, are ovulating females attracted to SMW; 2) In a natural spawning stream, are ovulating females attracted to synthetic 3kPZS; and 3) If attraction responses are found, what is the effective concentration of 3kPZS? Answering these questions will bridge the gap between laboratory and field behavioral experiments and provide preliminary results on the feasibility of using pheromone-baited traps to capture mature female sea lampreys. 77 METHODS Collection and Maintenance of Animals Sea lampreys were trapped or collected by hand from tributaries to Lakes Huron and Michigan by the staff of the US. Fish and Wildlife Service, Marquette Biological Station, Marquette, MI. All sea lampreys were transferred to the US. Geological Survey, Hammond Bay Biological Station, Millersburg, MI. The sea lampreys were held in flow- through tanks (1000 L) with Lake Huron water at ambient temperatures. Males were identified by a raised dorsal ridge and females by an enlarged and soft abdomen along with no dorsal ridge (Vladykov 1949). Males and females were then placed in separate holding tanks. Each sex was further assigned one of two maturity classifications according to the criteria and procedure set forth by Siefltes et al. (2003). For males, individuals that did not emit sperm alter gentle pressure was applied to the abdomen were classified as pre-spermiating males; males that did emit sperm were classified as spermiating males. For females, individuals that did not release eggs after gentle pressure was applied to the abdomen were classified as pre-ovulating females; females that did release eggs were classified as ovulating females. Sea lampreys were placed in separate tanks accordingly. 78 Behavior in a Spawning Stream To assess whether females exhibit attraction behaviors towards SMW and synthetic 3kPZS in a natural setting, we monitored ovulating and pre-ovulating female locomotion in the same 65-m section of the Ocqueoc River (Figure 2) used by Li et al. (2002). The Ocqueoc River is a historic sea lamprey spawning stream (Applegate 1950) in which a sea lamprey barrier was recently constructed to stop adults from migrating upstream to spawn. The absence of animals from the study area assured that there were no background levels of odorants from other adult sea lampreys to interfere with behavioral tests and yet offered water temperature and quality known to be suitable for sea lamprey reproduction. At the upstream portion of the study section, an island naturally divides the river creating two channels with approximately equal flow (1.6 m3/s). A block net was placed at the downstream end of the section. An acclimation cage (0.5 m3) for test subjects was constructed with a wood frame encased in plastic mesh and placed at the downstream end just above the block net. Three sets of experiments were conducted. In the first set, females were exposed to SMW, which were collected by holding five spermiating males in 50 L of water for 2 h. The SMW were randomly delivered to one side of the island that divides the river (Figure 2) using a peristaltic pump at approximately 200 ml/min. Based on the release rate of 3kPZS by spermiating males (approximately 500 ug/h/fish; Yun et al. 2002), the final concentration of 3kPZS in the spawning stream was approximately 2 x 10'12 M. A blank water control was also introduced at the same rate (200 mL/min) to the channel on the other side of the island. The second and third sets of experiments were conducted 79 A Figure 1. The spawning stream layout used in radio tracking experiments. CI and C2 indicate points in which water conditioned with spermiating males or 3-keto petromyzonol sulfate and control odorants were randomly introduced. A indicates the acclimation cage in which females were held before testing. Arrows indicate water flow. The dashed line represents the downstream block net used to prevent lampreys from exiting the study site. 80 using synthetic 3kPZS at the same concentration as measured in the conditioned water (10’'2 M) and one order of magnitude lower (10''3 M). To mix the odorants, the appropriate amount of synthetic 3kPZS was initially mixed with 1 ml of methanol and then added to 50 L of water and randomly delivered to one side of the island with a peristaltic pump at approximately 200 mL/min. A 1 ml methanol control was also mixed with 50 L of river water and introduced at the same rate (200 ml/min) to the other side of the island. Tests were conducted between 0700 and 1700 hours in water temperatures ranging from 15°C to 23°C. A day in advance of testing, four pre-ovulating or two to four ovulating female sea lampreys (depending on availability) were fitted with radio tags designed for external mount (Advanced Telemetry System, Isanti, MN) as described by Kelso and Gardner (2000). The tagged females and the odor sources were transported to the study site the following morning. The tagged females were then placed in the acclimation cage and allowed to acclimate, exposed to the two odor sources for 2 h. In each test the females were released and their location observed visually or by a radio receiver (Lotek Engineering Inc., Newmarket, ON, Canada) and recorded on a map grid of the site every 5 min. If females failed to move from the release site within an hour they were removed. If females did move from the release site they were observed until ( 1) they reached an odor source and stayed there for an hour, (2) they swam past the odor sources, or (3) it was the end of the test (when the odorant ran out). A contingency table was used to tally the behavior of females. Responses were categorized as swimming to the treatment odor source, swimming to the control odor source, or not choosing an odor source (staying at an intermediate position within the stream section or not leaving the 81 acclimation cage). A Fisher’s Exact Test was used to compare the choice of females in a natural environment. The times in which females swam to the odor sources were also recorded. Independence Tests of Observed Responses Since females were released in groups, independence of the observed responses needed to be addressed. To accomplish this, a series of analyses were conducted to look for evidence of differential responses among three treatments (groups of ovulating females exposed to SMW; groups of ovulating females exposed to 10"2 M synthetic 3kPZS; individual ovulating females exposed to a group of five spermiating males [from Li et al. 2002]). Within each treatment, each individual female was designated as an experimental unit. The multiple response measures examined were: 1) direction of initial movement — toward the treatment (SMW or 3kPZS), toward the control, or neither (an intermediate position); 2) final stopping point — treatment, control or neither and distance from the starting point; 3) if the treatment end of the stream was reached, the average number of time intervals (5 min. blocks) taken to get there; 4) probability of making a forward or lateral movement — the stream was divided into 13 equal length segments with segment 1 being the starting point and segment 13 being the end point. The stream was divided into three channels. The outside channels were randomly assigned to the treatment (T) or the control (C), with the center channel always being neither (N). Females could then make 1 of 9 directional moves (CC, CN, CT, NC, NN, NT, TC, TN, or TT) of between 0 and 12 segments in any one 5 minute period. Each trial lasted for 48 82 5-min. periods; 5) Probability of two or more females occupying the same segment x channel space (group trials only); 6) probability of two or more females following the same path (sequence of segment x channel spaces occupied) during the trial; 7) probability that females tested as a group exhibited different movement patterns (path followed) than did females tested individually. 83 RESULTS Water conditioned with spermiating males and synthetic 3kPZS influenced the behavior of ovulating females within the spawning stream section (Table 1). The behavior of all female sea lampreys in the Ocqueoc River varied greatly, ranging from fast movement upstream towards one of the odor sources to no movement from the acclimation cage. Females were not biased to either side of the stream (data not shown), but their movement was largely influenced by the odorants. When exposed to SMW, seven of ten ovulating females swam to and stayed for extended periods of time (2 h) at the exact point of odorant introduction repeatedly placing their nostril directly under the tube, while three did not choose an odor source. Of the seven that did choose, the mean time to swim the 65 m to the odorant was 29 min. No ovulating females swam to the control odorant. Among the ten pre-ovulating females exposed to SMW, one swam to the point of odorant introduction, none swam to the control odorant, and nine did not choose an odor source. When exposed to 10''2 M 3kPZS, seven of ten ovulating females swam to, paused, and swam past the point of odorant introduction, one swam to the control odorant, and two did not choose an odor source. Of the seven that did choose, the mean time to swim the 65 m to the odorant was 94 min. Among the ten pre-ovulating females exposed to 10''2 M 3kPZS, one swam to, paused, and swam past the point of odorant introduction, one swam to the control odorant, and eight did not choose an odor source. All ten ovulating females tested with 10''3 M 3kPZS did not choose an odor source. The distributions of choices differed significantly between ovulating females and pre-ovulating females when both SMW and 10'12 M 3kPZS were used as odor sources 84 Table 1. The distribution of ovulating and pre-ovulating female sea lampreys swimming to the treatment (TRT), control (CON), or staying at an intermediate position (INT) within a section of a known sea lamprey spawning stream when water conditioned with spermiating males (SMW) and 10"2 M 3-keto petromyzonol sulfate (synthetic 3kPZS) treatments were used. The distributions of choices were significantly different between ovulating and pre-ovulating females for each treatment suggesting an attraction by ovulating females to the treatments (Fisher’s Exact Test, 2-Tail, P < 0.03). SMW Synthetic 3kPZS Choice Choice Test TRT CON INT SYN CON TNT Ovulating female 7 0 3 7 l 2 Pre-ovulating female 1 0 9 l - l 8 85 (Fisher’s exact test, P<0.03). Further, ovulating females remained around the point of odorant introduction when SMW were used, but not when 10‘[2 M 3kPZS was used, however, this searching behavior was not quantified. Independence analyses demonstrated that the females tested as a group did not respond differently from those tested individually. The analyses strongly showed that 3kPZS is an effective attractant. There was no difference detected in the direction of initial movement among the three trials (x2 = 1.53, d.f. = 4, p > 0.05). Females tested within a group (SMW or 3kPZS) were as likely to remain in the center channel or move to the treatment or control channel as were females tested individually (individual tests from Li et al. [2002]). Seventy percent (7 of 10) of the females tested in the group 3kPZS trial, 70% (7 of 10) of those tested in the group SMW trial, and 67% (8 of 12) of those tested individually (with five spermiating males as the odor source) reached the end of the treatment channel (segment 13) during the trial period. The average number of time periods required to reach the end of the treatment channel was 4.5 (range = 2 - 9) for the individually tested females, 5.7 (range = 1 - 11) for the group of SMW tested females and 18.7 (range = 5 - 36) for the group of 3kPZS tested females. The results for the group 3kPZS test are inflated by one trial in which 3 of the 4 females reached the end of the treatment channel, but took 29, 34, and 36 time periods to do so. If these 3 individuals are removed from the analysis, the average number of time periods for the group 3kPZS tested females drops to 8.0 (range = 5 - 15). If lampreys being tested in a group are moving in a correlated manner, we should expect that the average time to reach the end of the treatment channel would be lower than that observed for lampreys that were tested independently. The opposite was true. 86 The movements of females were classified into one of three categories: within a channel, toward the treatment channel or away from the treatment channel. Within each of the three trials, because most of the females ended up in the end segment of the treatment channel, the highest probability for movement was within that channel. The probability of movement within the treatment channel was 0.60 in the group 3kPZS trial, 0.64 in the group SMW trial, and 0.71 in the individual trial. The probability of moving toward the treatment channel was the same in each of the three trials. The probability of moving away from the treatment channel was 0.01 in the group trials and 0.002 in the individual trials. 87 DISCUSSION Results show that odorants released by spermiating males significantly influenced the behavior of ovulating females and not pre-ovulating females in a natural spawning stream environment. Using SMW, seven of ten ovulating females swam the 65 m directly to and stayed at the point of odorant introduction. In addition, using 10'12 M 3kPZS, seven of ten ovulating females swam the 65 m to the point of odorant introduction, paused, and swam upstream, not staying at the point of odorant introduction. Finally, pre-ovulating females did not move upstream when exposed to the above odorants. Results also indicate that the spermiating male pheromone is active at extremely low concentrations. After SMW were found to induce attraction and search responses from ovulating females, they were analyzed for 3kPZS concentration using ELISA (Yun et al. 2002). The SMW were found to contain approximately 2 x 10'12 M 3kPZS. In comparison, 10'12 M synthetic 3kPZS was also able to induce an attraction response from ovulating females, but 10'” M synthetic 3kPZS was not able to induce the attraction response. Based on these data, it is logical to conclude that the lowest effective concentration of 3kPZS is approximately 10‘12 M. An effective low concentration makes sense in the context of sea lamprey biology. Sea lampreys spawn in fast flowing water where current velocity reaches 1 m/s (Applegate 1950). The passing water would quickly dilute the 3kPZS released by males. Even though 3kPZS is produced and released at a very high rate (around 0.50 mg/male/h; Yun et al. 2002, 2003) and through a highly 88 a.“ fin. efficient and specialized mechanism (Siefl 0.10; data not shown), indicating that adults were not biased to either side. Ovulating females, however, showed strong preference responses to sterilized, spermiating male chemical stimuli (Table 1). Eleven out of 12 ovulating females spent more time in the side of the maze containing five sterilized, spermiating males (P < 0.01, N = 12), and 9 of 10 ovulating females spent more time in the side containing water conditioned with sterilized, spermiating males (P < 0.02, N = 10). In contrast, none of the three other classes of test subjects showed a preference response to sterilized, spermiating male chemical stimuli (P > 0.10, see Table 1 for sample sizes), and ovulating females did not Show a preference response to sterilized, prespermiating male chemical stimuli (P > 0.10, N = 10; data not shown). Consistent with the preference results, there was an increase in searching behavior by ovulating females exposed to chemical stimuli from sterilized, spermiating males (Table 2): all eight ovulating females spent significantly more time searching in the side of the maze containing five sterilized, spermiating males (P < 0.01, N = 8) and seven of eight ovulating females spent significantly more time searching in the side containing water conditioned with sterilized, spermiating males (P < 0.01, N = 8). In contrast, none of the three other classes of test subjects showed significant increases or decreases in searching behavior (P > 0.10, see Table 2 for sample sizes), and ovulating females did not 109 Table 1. Chemical stimuli from sterilized, spermiating male sea lampreys (Petromyzon marinus) induced preference responses from ovulating females only. N: sample size. Preference is the number of test subjects that spent proportionately more time after stimulus introduction in treatment (scented) side. P-values were determined using a Wilcoxon Signed Ranks Test (2-tailed) using indices of preference. NS: not significant (P > 0.10). Preference ratio is the mean ratio (standard deviation) of the time spent in seconds in the treatment/control sides after stimulus introduction. *indicates ovulating female tests using water conditioned with sterilized, spermiating males as the stimulus SOUI'CC. Test subject N Preference P Preference ratio Ovulating female 12 11 < 0.01 7.0 (5.5) *Ovulating female 10 9 < 0.02 2.0 (1.0) Pre-ovulating female 10 6 NS 1.7 (1.0) Non-sterilized 11 7 NS 1.4 (1.8) spermiating male Non-sterilized 10 6 NS 2.2 (1.6) pre-spermiating male 110 Table 2. Chemical stimuli from sterilized, spermiating male sea lampreys (Petromyzon marinus) increased searching responses from ovulating females only. N: sample size. Searching is the number of test subjects that spent proportionately more time swimming after stimulus introduction in treatment (scented) side. P-values were determined using a Wilcoxon Signed Ranks Test (2-tailed) using indices of preference. NS: not significant (P > 0.10). Searching ratio is the mean ratio (standard deviation) of the time in seconds spent swimming in the treatment/control sides after stimulus introduction. *indicates ovulating female tests using water conditioned with sterilized, spermiating males as the stimulus source. Test subject N Searching P Searching ratio Ovulating female 8 8 < 0.01 3.9 (1.5) *Ovulating female 8 7 < 0.01 3.3 (4.0) Pre-ovulating female 7 3 NS 1.3 (1.3) Non-sterilized 10 5 NS 0.8 (1 .2) spermiating male Non-sterilized 8 5 NS 2.4 (2.7) pre-spermiatinfig male lll show significant increases or decreases in searching behavior (P > 0.10, N = 8; data not shown) in response to sterilized, prespermiating male chemical stimuli. The chemical stimuli released by sterilized, spermiating males influenced the behavior of ovulating females, but not of preovulating females, within the spawning stream section. Females were not biased toward either side of the stream. Among the 15 ovulating females tested, 10 swam to and then stayed at the cage containing sterilized, spermiating males and five did not choose a stimulus source. Of the ten that did choose, the mean time to swim the 65 m to the sterilized, spermiating males was 29 min. No ovulating females swam to the cage containing sterilized, prespermiating males. Among the 10 preovulating females tested, three swam to the cage containing sterilized, spermiating males, two swam to the cage containing sterilized, prespermiating males, and five did not choose a stimulus source. The distributions of choices differed significantly between ovulating and preovulating females (P = 0.024). Although the behavior was not quantified, we observed ovulating females swimming repetitively around and against the cage containing sterilized, spermiating males for l h. The three preovulating females that swam to the sterilized, spermiating male cage and the two that swam to the sterilized, prespermiating male cage did not display this behavior, but paused briefly at the cages and continued swimming upstream. In EOG experiments the chemical stimuli released by sterilized (N = 8) and nonsterilized (N = 8), spermiating males induced similar responses from the olfactory epithelium of adult females, but chemical stimuli from nonsterilized, prespermiating males (N = 4) did not at equivalent concentrations (Figure 1). Both sterilized and nonsterilized, spermiating male conditioned waters had detection thresholds of 112 Figure 1. (a) Representative electro-olfactogram (EOG) responses of female sea lampreys (Petromyzon marinus) to chemical stimuli from sterilized, spermiating males (SSM, diamonds), non-sterilized, spermiating males (SM, open circles), and non- sterilized, pre-sperrniating males (PSM, filled circles). Std designates the response to a 10'5 M L-arginine standard and Con the response to a blank water control. Numbers along the x-axis indicate the logarithmic value of the dilution from the original conditioned water collected by holding one male in 10 l for 4 h. (b) Female sea lamprey EOG dose-response relationships to SSM (N = 8), SM (N = 8), and PSM (N = 4) chemical stimuli. Responses are measured as a percentage of the response to a 10'5 M L- arginine standard. Vertical bars represent one standard error. 113 >Ev Hana: 2mm $553.» Em Con Std page; 2m.— m -3 . 0 0 6 d d u u u - 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 3 2 1 3.89:3 ”:3 Rev 3.538% -100 J Dilution Figure l. 114 approximately 105 times dilution. The detection threshold for nonsterilized, prespermiating male chemical stimuli was approximately 102 times dilution, one thousand times more concentrated than the dilution required for detection of sterilized and nonsterilized, spermiating male chemical stimuli. Cross—adaptation experiments demonstrated that female olfactory responses were affected by continuous exposure to spermiating male chemical stimuli (ANOVA; P < 0.01). Although the responses to L-arginine standard did not significantly change before and during adaptation (Student’s t test; P > 0.05), there were substantial differences among responses to sterilized and nonsterilized, spermiating male chemical stimuli before and during adaptation (Student’s t tests; P < 0.01). Both sterilized and non- sterilized, spermiating male chemical stimuli suppressed olfactory responsiveness to themselves and each other when used as adapting stimuli (Figure 2a). For example, when sterilized spermiating male chemical stimuli (Figure 2b; N = 5) were used as the adapting stimuli, the initial responses were 2.17 3: 0.23 mV for sterilized, spermiating male chemical stimuli and 1.52 i 0.39 mV for nonsterilized, spermiating male chemical stimuli, while during adaptation, the responses of sterilized, spermiating male chemical stimuli to itself was 0.08 i 0.02 mV and to nonsterilized, spermiating male chemical stimuli was 0.18 i 0.13 mV. When nonsterilized, spermiating male chemical stimuli were used as the adapting stimulus (Figure 2c; N = 5), the same pattern of olfactory suppression occurred for each chemical stimulus. Negative and positive fast atom bombardment mass spectrometry showed that the base peak (the most abundant molecule) of crude extracts of all three samples of water conditioned with sterilized, spermiating males had a molecular weight of 472 Dalton, the 115 Figure 2. (a) Representative electro-olfactogram (EOG) responses of female sea lampreys (Petromyzon marinus) to chemical stimuli from sterilized spermiating male (SSM) and non-sterilized spermiating male (SM) before (white bars) and during (shaded bars) adaptation to a SSM chemical stimuli. Std designates the response to a 10'5 M L- arginine standard and Con the response to a blank water control. Female EOG responses to a 10'5 M L-arginine standard, SSM and SM chemical stimuli both before and during adaptation to SSM (b) and SSM (c) chemical stimuli were measured. Vertical bars represent one standard deviation. 116 A. SM SM SSM M g M m S S M m S S S Ti. % n .. u 0 q c e e .n . A A m s S T. I we 5 E E m m m >5 4 >5 v 3 2 1 0 no 7.. ..1 0 2. e 5.33%?“ 98.6m— EESaaca 9.2:: 9.5 8.59.3— Ms E 117 same as extracts from the three samples of water conditioned with nonsterilized, spermiating males (Figure 3a, 3b). The isotopic patterns of sterilized and nonsterilized, spermiating males are virtually identical and no other major peaks are present in either spectrum. 118 (a) 100 - 80 4 472 60 - 40- 20" 400 420 440 460 480 500 100 - Relative abundance (%) 80 r 472 60 - 40 - 20- Figure 3. Negative and positive fast atom bombardment mass spectrometry (10 KV) spectrum of (a) extracts of water conditioned with non-sterilized spermiating male sea lampreys (Petromyzon marinas) and (b) extracts of water conditioned with sterilized spermiating males. 119 DISCUSSION The combined results of all four experiments show that bisazir-sterilized male sea lampreys during spermiation are capable of attracting ovulating females, and this attraction is mediated through the release of a sex pheromone in an amount similar to that released by nonsterilized males during spermiation. In the first experiment, when placed in a two-choice maze, ovulating females both preferred and spent more time searching in the treatment side of the maze containing chemical stimuli from sterilized, spermiating males. These results are nearly identical to those of Li et al. (2002) where 22 of 22 and eight of eight ovulating females preferred and spent more time searching in the side of the maze conditioned with nonsterilized, spermiating males and 12 of 15 and 7 of 7 ovulating females preferred and spent more time searching in the side conditioned with nonsterilized, spermiating male washings. Searching behavior could be the mechanism underlying the attraction response that leads female sea lampreys to male partners in a spawning stream. Sea lampreys ofien nest in rapids and chemical stimuli from nesting animals are flushed downstream (Applegate 1950). Individuals responding to chemical stimuli by searching and swimming against the current stand a better chance of reaching the nesting individuals upstream (Li et al. 2002). Further, ovulating, but not preovulating females were attracted to sterilized, spermiating males in their natural spawning habitat, further demonstrating that only ovulating females that are ready to spawn are attracted to spermiating males. It is notable that in a previous study conducted in the same stream section under similar conditions, 9 of 13 ovulating females chose the side conditioned 120 with five nonsterilized, spermiating males (Li et al. 2002), whereas in this study 10 of 15 ovulating females chose the side conditioned with five sterilized, spermiating males. The virtually identical levels of behavioral responses observed in the first experiment may be attributable to the virtually identical levels of sex pheromone production and release between sterilized and nonsterilized, spermiating males, as demonstrated in experiments 2 and 3. In the second experiment, EOG results showed that sterilized and nonsterilized, spermiating male chemical stimuli produced similar dose-response relationships in females, demonstrating that the chemical stimuli from both types of animals have the same potency. The olfactory potency of nonsterilized, spermiating male chemical stimuli was first observed by Bjerselius et al. (1995). Our results confirm the potency and show that sterilized males can be just as potent. Also, EOG cross-adaptation experiments showed that chemical stimuli from sterilized and nonsterilized, spermiating males suppressed olfactory responsiveness to each other and to themselves after olfactory adaptation to one had occurred, demonstrating that water conditioned with sterilized and nonsterilized, spermiating males are of the same quality in terms of their olfactory stimulatory effectiveness. Our fast atom bombardment mass spectrometry analysis further showed that the same pheromonal molecule is responsible for the behavioral and electrophysiological responses elicited by chemical stimuli from both sterilized and nonsterilized, spermiating males. The most abundant molecule contained in extracts of water conditioned with sterilized and nonsterilized, spermiating males has the same molecular weight and isotopic patterns that are characteristic of 7a, 1211, 24-trihydroxy 5a-cholan-3-one 24- sulfate, the molecule demonstrated to induce behaviors identical to those induced by 121 nonsterilized, spermiating males (Li et al. 2002) and by sterilized, spermiating males. All four of our experiments demonstrate the biosynthesis and release of a sex pheromone by sterilized, spermiating males. The close similarity of our results to that of Li et al. (2002) also demonstrate that the mechanisms regulating pheromone production and release were intact in males sterilized by bisazir treatment. For a sterile male release technique to be effective, it is essential that the sterilization process does not negatively affect the mating competency of sterilized individuals (Knipling 1964). Previous field tests demonstrated that sterile male sea lampreys displayed nest-building behaviors and obtained mates (Hanson and Manion 1978). Our study expanded on these findings and further demonstrated that the male sex pheromone signaling system is not affected by bisazir treatment. Bisazir may induce lethal mutations in gametes (Hanson and Manion 1980) that cause premature death in heterozygotes if dominant, and in homozygotes if recessive. Spawning behaviors of sea lampreys, on the other hand, are under direct regulation by the central nervous system, which in turn is influenced by the hypothalamus-pituitary gland-gonad axis (Sower 1990). Since the release of sex pheromone coincides with spermiation (Li et al. 2002), a process also regulated by the hypothalamus-pituitary gland-gonad axis (Sower 1990), it is possible that sex pheromone release is also regulated by this axis. It is not likely that the dosage of bizasir injected for sterilization will affect this system, and thus, reproductive behavior, pheromone release, and ultimately mating efficacy. Further, it appears that the slightly higher than expected levels of egg viability from the sterile male release technique (Bergstedt et al. 2003) is not due to the effect of bisazir treatment on pheromone synthesis and release. 122 Recently, the potential upregulation of pheromone biosynthesis and release was proposed for the sterile male release technique program of sea lamprey management (Li et a1. 2003). The concept is that sterilized males would be induced to synthesize and release the sex pheromone at higher concentrations, for longer periods of time, or both. A similar concept, where cues (similar to natural pheromonal compounds) are synthesized to be more potent, have been developed for the oriental fruit fly (Bactrocera dorsalis) and applied in their control (Lanier 1990). If a technique to upregulate the sex pheromone in sea lampreys can be developed, it would potentially improve the efficacy of the current sterile male release technique, which is mainly limited by the number of males that can be collected for sterilization and release (Twohey et al. in 2003b). Numerous invasive fish species are currently affecting fish communities in the Great Lakes (Michigan Sea Grant 1994), large lake ecosystems worldwide (Hall and Mills 2000), and other aquatic ecosystems across North America (Courtenay et al. 1986). Resistance to widespread use of nonselective pesticides severely limits efforts to control these or any invasive fish species. Also, alternatively, nonchemical control methods have been developed for other pests, but most are not easily transferred to fish. Sterile male release may provide an alternative means to control invasive fish species if it can be demonstrated that bisazir treatment does not affect reproductive function, including production and release of sex pheromones in these fish. 123 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS We thank the staffs of the US. Geological Survey Hammond Bay Biological Station and the US. Fish and Wildlife Service Marquette Biological Station for their assistance with this project. We also thank Dolly Trump and Lydia Lorenz for the use of their private land as a field study site. The Department of Fisheries and Oceans, Ontario, Canada supplied radiotelemetry equipment and Dr. Douglas Gage of Michigan State University provided the facility for and expertise in chemical analysis. This research was supported by the Great Lakes Fishery Commission. This article is Contribution 1224 of the US. Geological Survey, Great Lakes Science Center. 124 REFERENCES Applegate, V.C. 1950. Natural history of the sea lamprey (Petromyzon marinus) in Michigan. US. Fish. Wildl. Serv. Spec. Sci. Rep. Fish. Serv. no. 55 Bergstedt, R.A., McDonald, R.B., Twohey, M.B., Mullett, K.M., Young, R.J., and Heinrich, J .W. 2003. Reduction in reproductive success of sea lampreys through release of sterilized males. J. Great Lakes Res. In press. Bjerselius, R., Li, W., Sorensen, P.W., and Scott, AP. 1996. Spermiated male sea lamprey release a potent sex pheromone. In Proceedings of the fifth international symposium on the reproductive physiology of fish. Edited by P. Thomas and F. Goetz. Austin, TX, pp. 271. Coble, D.W., Bruesewitz, R.E., Fratt, T.W., and Schreirer, J.W. 1990. Lake trout, sea lamprey, and overfishing in the upper Great Lakes: a review and reanalysis. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 119: 985-995. Courtenay, W.R., Hensley, D.A., Taylor, J .N., and McCann, J .A. 1986. Distribution of exotic fishes in North America. In The Zoogeography of North American Freshwater Fishes. Edited by CH. Hocutt and EC. Wiley. New York, Wiley. pp. 675-698. Getchell, TV. 1974. Electrogenic sources of slow voltage transients recorded from frog olfactory epithelium. J. Neurophysiol. 37: 1115-1130. Hall, SR. and Mills, EL. 2000. Exotic species in large lakes of the world. Aquat. Ecosyst. Health Manage. 3(1): 105-135. Hanson, L.H. and Manion, PJ. 1980. Sterility method of pest control and its potential role in an integrated sea lamprey (Petromyzon marinus) control program. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 37: 2108-2117. Hanson, L.H. and Manion, PJ. 1978. Chemosterilization of the sea lamprey (Petromyzon marinas). Great Lakes Fish. Comm. Tech. Rep. No. 29. Kelso, J .R.M. and Gardner, W.M. 2000. Emmigration, upstream movement, and habitat use by sterile and fertile sea lampreys in three Lake Superior tributaries. N. Am. J. Fish. Manage. 20: 144-153. Kitchell, J .F. 1990. The scope for mortality caused by sea lamprey. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 119: 642-648. 125 Knipling, ER 1964. The potential role of the sterility method for insect population control with special reference to combining this method with conventional methods. US. Dept. Agric. Res. Serv. ARS-33-98. Lanier, G. N. 1990. Principles of attraction-annihilation: mass trapping and other means. In Behavior-modifying chemicals for pest management: applications of pheromones and other attractants. Edited by RL. Ridgway, R.M. Silverstein and M. N. Inscoe. New York: Marcel Kekker, pp 25-46. Li, W. 1994. The olfactory biology of adult sea lamprey (Petromyzon marinus). Ph. D thesis. University of Minnesota. Li, W. and Sorensen, P.W. 1997. Four independent olfactory receptor sites for bile acids, putative migratory pheromones, in adult sea lamprey (Petromyzon marinus). J. Comp. Physiol. A. 180(4): 429-438. Li, W., Sorensen, P.W., and Gallaher, DD. 1995. The olfactory system of migratory adult sea lamprey (Petromyzon marinus) is specifically and acutely sensitive to unique bile acids released by conspecific larvae. J. Gen Physiol. 105: 567-587. Li, W., Scott, A.P., Siefltes, M.J., Yan, H., Liu, Q, Yun, S-S, and Gage, DA. 2002. Bile Acid Secreted by Male Sea Lamprey that Acts as a Sex Pheromone. Science 296: 138- 141. Li, W., Siefkes, M.J., Scott, AP, and Teeter, J .H. 2003. Sex pheromone communication in the sea lamprey: implications for integrated management. J. Great Lakes Res. In press. Liley, NR. 1982. Chemical communication in fish. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 39: 22-35. Michigan Sea Grant, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA Sea Grant Program. 1994. Exotic species in the Great Lakes. Great Lakes Legislation Updates. 4 pp. Ottoson, D. 1956. Analysis of the electrical activity of the olfactory epithelium. Acta Physiol. Scand. 35(Supp. 122): 1-83. Rao, P.V. 1998. Statistical Research Models in the Life Sciences. Brooks /Cole Publishing Company, Pacific Grove, California. Schleen, L.P., Christie, G.C., Heinrich, J.W., Bergstedt, R.A., Young, R.J., Morse, T.J., Lavis, D.S., Bills, T.D., Johnson, J .E., and Ebener, MP. 2003. Control of sea lamprey in the St. Mary’s River: a case study in integrated and coordinated fisheries management. J. Great Lakes Res. In press. 126 Smith, BR. 1971. Sea lamprey in the Great Lakes of North America. In The biology of lamprey, vol. 1. Edited by M.W. Hardisty and LC. Potter. Academic Press, New York, pp. 207-247. Smith, BR. and Tibbles, J .J . 1980. Sea lamprey (Petromyzon marinus) in Lake Huron, Michigan, and Superior: history of invasion and control, 1936-1978. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 37: 1780-1801. Solomon, DJ. 1977. A review of chemical communication in freshwater fish. J. Fish. Biol. 11: 363-376. Sower, SA. 1990. Neuroendocrine control of reproduction in lampreys. Fish Physiol. Biochem. 8(5): 365-374. Spangler, G.R., Robson, D.S., and Regeir, HA. 1980. Estimates of lamprey-induced mortality in Whitefish, Coregonus clupeaformis. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 37(11) 2146- 2150. Stacey, N.E., Cardwell, J.R., Liley, N.R., Scott, AR, and Sorensen, P.W. 1994. Hormones as sex pheromones in fish. In Perspectives in ComparativeEndocrinology. Edited by KC. Davey, R.E. Peter, and SS. Tobe. National Research Council of Canada, Ottawa. Pp. 438-448. Twohey, M.B., Hanson, L.H., Heinrich, J .W., Seelye, J .G., Bergstedt, R.A., McDonald, RB, and Christie, G.C. 2003a. History and development of the sterile male release technique in sea lamprey management. J. Great Lakes Res. In press. Twohey, M.B., Sorensen, P.W., and Li, W. 2003b. How might new knowledge of pheromone communication in sea lamprey contribute to an integrated sea lamprey management program? J. Great Lakes Res. In press. Vladykov, V.D. 1949. Quebec lamprey. 1.-List of species and their economical importance. Dept. F ish., Prov. Quebec, Contrib. 26. 127 SUMMARY OF DISSERTATION At the onset of this research the function of the male sea lamprey sex pheromone had been partially characterized, and its specificity and identity had been determined. The male sex pheromone was shown to be released by spermiating males and to attract ovulating females (Pre-spermiating males were not attractive to ovulating females and pre-ovulating females were not attracted to spermiating males). The spermiating male sex pheromone was found to be the bile acid 701, 12a, 24-trihydroxy-5cr-cholan-3-one-24 sulfate (3-keto petromyzonol sulfate or 3kPZS). Overall, this was the first male sex pheromone identified in fish and appeared to be capable of functioning over relatively long distances. This research examined several aspects of sea lamprey sex pheromone communication in order to elucidate the intricate mechanisms whereby mature males attract mature females. In the laboratory, I determined the site of synthesis and excretion of 3kPZS and the potency and specificity of 3kPZS to female olfactory organs in order to understand the physiological processes for 3kPZS to realize its signaling potential. In the interim, the effectiveness of 3kPZS and water conditioned with spermiating males was demonstrated in a natural spawning environment. In chapter 1, techniques including behavioral assays, electro-olfactograms, biochemical analyses, and immunocytochemistry were used to show that 3kPZS was produced in the liver and released exclusively through the gills of spermiating males. For a sex pheromone signaling system to function over long distances a means of achieving biologically relevant concentrations downstream needs to be developed. The gills have 128 an enormous surface area and offer a potentially efficient site for 3kPZS exchange with the environment. Therefore, it appears that sea lampreys have evolved a specialized sex pheromone release mechanism that is capable of releasing large amounts of 3kPZS. In chapter 2, electro-olfactograms were used to show that 3kPZS is a potent odorant that is detected at a concentration of 10'12 M and that 3kPZS is discriminated from other conspecific bile acids by the olfactory organs of females. These results also lend evidence to support that the male sex pheromone functions over long distances. Sea lampreys spawn in fast-flowing water and 3kPZS that is released by males will be quickly diluted. Also, sea lampreys spawn in streams that contain larvae (as well as other adults) that release bile acids similar in structure to 3kPZS. The ability to detect 3kPZS at extremely low concentrations and to discriminate it from similar odorants is necessary in order for 3kPZS to firnction as a sex pheromone over long distances. In chapter 3, in-stream behavioral assays using radio telemetry showed that both 10"2 M 3kPZS and water conditioned with spermiating males (in which the 3kPZS concentration was estimated to be 2 x 10"2 M) were able to attract ovulating females 65 m upstream to the point of odorant introduction. These results are direct evidence that the male sex pheromone is able to function over long distances. Also, the effectiveness of 10‘l2 M 3kPZS in these behavioral experiments complement the detection thresholds found in chapter 2. Not only do these results confirm the hypothesis that 3kPZS is a male sex pheromone that can function over long distances and further elucidate the mechanisms whereby mature males attract mature females, they also have the potential to impact sea lamprey management in the Great Lakes. By knowing the production and release site of 129 3kPZS and how females detect conspecific bile acids, it may be possible to use this knowledge to disrupt the signaling system either by preventing males from releasing 3kPZS or preventing females from detecting 3kPZS. Furthermore, by knowing that the sex pheromone functions in a natural environment it appears feasible to develop trapping techniques to remove females from the spawning grounds. Also, further exploring the production mechanisms of 3kPZS may yield a productive and cheap way to synthesize 3kPZS, which could be used for potential management practices like trapping. The male sex pheromone may also be used to augment current sea lamprey control strategies such as the sterile male release technique. If sex pheromone production in sterilized males can be upregulated, sterilized males may be more competitive for mates. However, whether or not the sterilization process affects sex pheromone release was unknown. Chapter 4 of this dissertation describes a multi-disciplinary approach including behavioral assays, electro-olfactograms and mass spectrometry that demonstrated that the sterilization process does not affect sex pheromone release. In addition to the possibility of developing new concepts and techniques for integrated sea lamprey management, these results advance our understanding of sex pheromone communication in fish and vertebrates. This is the first male sex pheromone and first bile acid sex pheromone identified in fish and has been shown to function at low concentrations in a natural environment over relatively long distances. Moreover this study offers the first example that gills contain the machinery to and do release a sulfated sex pheromone. In the long run, information on how this sex pheromone is produced and released and how adult sea lampreys smell bile acids produced by conspecifics will bring benefits outside of sea lamprey management that are not immediately apparent. 130 APPENDIX PERMISSION TO USE PUBLISHED MATERIAL 131 Permission to use the following article Sieflces, M.J., Scott, A.P., Zielinski, B., Yun, S.-S., and Li, W. 2003. Male sea lampreys, Petromyzon marinus L., excrete a sex pheromone from gill epithelia. Biology of Reproduction, 69:125-132. September 3, 2003 Ms. Judith Jansen Society for the Study of Reproduction 1619 Monroe Street Madison, WI 53711-2063 Dear Ms. Jansen: I recently spoke with a member of your staff about gaining your permission to use a recently published article in my Ph.D. dissertation. The citation is: Siefkes, MJ, Scott, AP, Zielinski, B, Yun, S-S, and Li, W. 2003. Male sea lampreys, Petromyzon marinas L., excrete a sex pheromone from gill epithelia. Biol. Reprod. 69:125-132. My dissertation will be published for the Michigan State University Library in December of 2003. The above-mentioned paper will be appropriately cited within this dissertation. Biology of Reproduction will maintain the copyright to the above paper. Ifyou need any other statements from me to make this official, please let me know. Please send the letter of permission to: Michael J. Siefkes Department of Fisheries and Wildlife Michigan State University 13 Natural. Resources Building East Lansing, MI 48824 Thanks for your time. Michael Siefkes Pennission granted bythe Societytorthe Studyof Reproduction, lnc.. provided that the original publication is appropriately cited. 132 Permission to use the following article Siefkes, M.J. and Li, W. In press. Electrophysiological evidence for detection and discrimination of pheromonal bile acids by the olfactory epithelium of female sea lampreys (Petromyzon marinus). Journal of Comparative Physiology A. Dear Alice, I recently had a manuscript accepted for publication in one of your journals (Journal of Comparative Physiology A). I am finishing up my PhD and need to use this paper in my thesis. How do I obtain permission to use this accepted paper? Your quick response will be greatly appreciated. Thanks. Michael J. Sieflces Department of Fisheries and Wildlife Michigan State University 13 Natural Resources East Lansing, MI 48824 Phone: (517)353-7981 Fax: (517)432-1699 Dear Michael, Thank you for your e-mail of November 25, 2003. We are pleased to grant you the permission requested, provided full credit (Springer journal title, article title, name(s) of author(s), volume, page numbers, year of publication, Springer copyright notice) is given to the publication in which the material was originally published. With kind regards, Rosita ****************** Rosita Sturm (Ms.) Rights & Permissions Springer-Verlag GmbH & Co. KG Tiergartenstrasse 17 69121 Heidelberg GERMANY Tel: 4+ 49 (0) 6221 - 487 8228 Fax: ++ 49 (0) 6221 - 487 8100 e-mail: Sturm@springer.de internet: www.springer.de/rights 133 Permission to use the following article Sieflces, M. J ., Bergstedt, R. A., Twohey, M. B., and Li, W. 2003. Chemosterilization of male sea lampreys (Petromyzon marinus) does not affect sex pheromone release. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 60:23-31. Paul, The editorial office of CJFAS told me to contact you about getting permission to use the following published manuscript in my PhD dissertation: Siefltes MJ, Bergstedt RA, Twohey MB, and Li W. 2003. Chemosterilization of male sea lampreys does not affect sex pheromone release. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 60: 23-31. If you could let me know the procedures for including this in my dissertation, it would be greatly appreciated. Thanks for your time. Michael J. Siefltes Department of Fisheries and Wildlife Michigan State University 13 Natural Resources East Lansing, MI 48824 Phone: (517)432-1141 Fax: (517)432-1699 Dear Michael Permission is granted for use of the material, as descibed below, provided that acknowledgement is given to the source. Sincerely, Paul McClymont Business Manager NRC Research Press Tel: 613-993-9093 Fax: 613-952-7656 E-Mail: paul.mcclymont@nrc.ca ----- Original Message----- From: Michael Sieflces [mailtozsiefltesm@msu.edu] Sent: September 2, 2003 2:51 PM To: paul.mcclymont@nrc.ca Subject: Permission to include a published manuscript in my PhD dissertation 134