LEBRARY Mich'figan State University PLACE IN RETURN BOX to remove this checkout from your record. TO AVOID FINES return on or before date due. MAY BE RECALLED with earlier due date if requested. DATE DUE DATE DUE DATE DUE 6/01 c:/CIRC/DateDue.p65-p.15 UKRAI ’EAN IML'. ‘ In; A FOOT IN TWO WORLDS: UKRAINIAN IMMIGRANTS NEGOTIATING A LITERATE IDENTITY By Bette J. Shellhorn A DISSERTATION Submitted to Michigan State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Department of Education 2003 UKRAINIAN II.“ This study Of 3" - he'san community :‘ flirt-C: a I tel J'Ii. Churches 3": :easaaamopant 3: ~“J?ty Obserraf WIS teen to com we taterlals beam all106$ the ex* 3:2“? ‘- a.) es lo the hove 1.537% ,tlg CIESCIlbiDg a 3‘1“?» AI," 13;; IIC Study “no. t‘fir 7‘ 3W” Process v. ‘ “We" ”'5 5"pn “. POI: Enn‘ ~ C531 Com - ID'] r} H UM! 3.: “‘:"::3"v"all. My NEW-”xiv; ;. 7 J” ABSTRACT A FOOT IN TWO WORLDS: UKRAINIAN IMMIGRANTS NEGOTIATING A LITERATE IDENTITY By Bette J. Shellhorn This study of immigrants negotiating language and identity in a Ukrainian American community examined the literacy and social life in sociolinguistic and historical perspectives, comparing pre-emigration life in Ukraine with life in the United States. Research sites in this community included several Ukrainian Catholic Churches and a Ukrainian Catholic Elementary and High School. My role as a participant observer in the community provided an intimate look at the community. Observation on site, interviews with participants in the community, surveys given to community members, and collecting primary and secondary source materials became the data focus. The question guiding this research was, How does the experience of a new immigrant group unfold when there are already ties to the homeland, its language and religion, awaiting its members? Analyzing, describing and interpreting data from historical records, and ethnographic study within this community presented an in-depth look at the immigration process within one community where literacy, spirituality, and social networks support English language learning and assimilation of American cultural identity. Community support also provides maintenance of strong and educationally supportive ties to the Ukrainian language, culture, religion, and education. Copyright by BETTE J. SHELLHORN 2003 In honor of my parents, Philip and Pauline, who taught me to love books and to treasure knowledge. To my husband, Terry, the love of my life, who selflessly loves me daily. And for our dearest sons, Colin and Jason, who are the joy of our lives and my reason for pursuing the dream of education. iv Any work of g' aeration is no ex: tamg process for F SW of insp:'ation ° Stsar's timely words issetaton process 4‘3“; Sewer for the In. ' 'tifi . v r I Ea» ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Any work of great value is created in concert with many people. This dissertation is no exception. There are many people who have had a part in the learning process for me over the years. Susan Florio-Ruane has been a great source of inspiration for a number of years and an amazing dissertation director. Susan’s timely words and poignant insights were so helpful during the entire dissertation process. Thank you. Many thanks to Lynn Paine, Laura Apol, and Jenny Denyer, for the coursework we shared during the doctoral program that prepared me for this study and for their guidance as my dissertation committee. Lynn Paine was the principal investigator for the one year pilot study completed before beginning my dissertation study. All of these superb women have been mentors and role models as scholars these past years of doctoral study. P. David Pearson, David Labaree, Taffy Raphael, and Suzanne Wilson have been generous with their knowledge and I am thankful for the opportunity to learn the fine points of scholarship from each one. There are many others over the years who have shared knowledge that has helped me to move fonlvard with my research. My thanks to each one. The Detroit Ukrainian community warmly welcomed me and provided a world of knowledge for this study. Each conversation and activity that we shared was an exceptional experience. Thank you, all, for your willingness to share your time and your knowledge with me. vi THE PHOTOGRAPH He finds it in his mother’s drawer of souvenirs, blurred and bent; an out-of-focus photograph as brown and cracked as leather. The trees and foliage arch like feathers. There is a house, one story, in the rear, behind the lumpy humans growing up — those arms and shoulders so rigidly posed, those faces like smudged thumbprints on a wall. He must recognize these children — by a slouch, a shape, a tilt of the head — as his uncles and aunts. One daughter is massive, and the other, the boy’s mother, is as slim and tall as her eldest brother and the man who sits stiff-backed in front beside the round little woman in a shawl. The details of each shape are off-center, the photo looks as if it had been taken at the instant people, house, and trees were shaken by an earthquake or a wind. The more he looks at it, the more the boy cannot be sure of where this is, or when. The house could be in Kovno, Vilna, or Carnarsie. Is this his uncle, really? That his aunt? The photo could belong to someone else. The family could be anyone’s. By Morton Marcus (Marcus,1988) vii This is a stuc Eastern European 1r tamed on a group 5 Research stes ll". th: andaUkralnzan Ca'f times were ofiere tries Classes art 51336.75. The public Fireman My role a< We look at the c it: xllected wthln t resending oi the | it of tenth format The main resea Iat’cw immigrant 9' image and reln SIDE lF-‘a "u; :6 390 so study rm .E‘Séi‘n . “h USN) i' 9 ehncr . v I “a "3 33% a»- IT \ PREFACE This is a study of identity formation during the immigration process for an Eastern European immigrant community living in the United States. The study focused on a group of Ukrainian immigrants living near the Detroit area. Research sites in this community included several Ukrainian Catholic Churches and a Ukrainian Catholic Elementary and High School. Worship services at the churches were offered in English and Ukrainian to church members and their families. Classes at the schools included English and Ukrainian courses for K-12 students. The public also participated in church events in English and/or Ukrainian. My role as a participant observer in the community provided an intimate look at the community. By analyzing, describing and interpreting the data collected within this Ukrainian American community, a greater understanding of the immigration process for immigrants emerged to view the r Ole of identity formation in the immigration process. The main research question for the study was: How does the experience Of a new immigrant group unfold when there are already ties to the homeland. its li-lrtguage and religion, awaiting its members? A variety of research methods Were used to study the Ukrainian American immigrant community. Qualitative research, using ethnographic research methods helped to define the research paradigm. The study used participant perspectives and the participants in the Ukrainian community had an interest in the findings about the community. Observation on site, interviews with participants in the community, surveys given viii r communly me” beat me the locus fr For exam"' “Pie “135585 at the schor #5 n ?h If”?! i'fe U y. .r'; . iews w: I 503 menses for F a VB .ené ‘ .ssror. from th 6 ate?» . as of transc ”ties up .aJdio tap: tr A: g C .fidzng com . i m “fitm- Uh “Mb ‘ ylamrly m ctser en ted iTOm p a». art. may lc: research m eth - O is it «I mfg”) 'l is} 0 protect tr .2: ' 560 were USEd «'3? I.- ' t, I IVIII ‘ d 3i to community members, and collecting primary and secondary source materials became the focus for this study. For example, observation during worship services at the churches and classes at the school provided a view of daily life at the church and school. One- hour interviews with some of the participants brought clarity to individual experiences for a variety of informants. The interviews were audio taped, (where permission from the participants was granted) to obtain a closer look during the analysis of transcripts. Interviews less than one hour in length, observation field notes, audio taping of events and interviews, public information about the surrounding community and the immigrant experience, oral and written personal history by family members and other members of the group, and information observed from participation in the worship services and language classes were other research methods used during the study. Direct quotes were not used in this study to protect the anonymity of participants. Names of people who are deceased were used, however, pseudonyms were used for participants that are currently living, and all data was securely kept in my possession during the study. An explanation of the research process regarding the use of names and quotes can be found in Appendix A. Another method used to accompany the fieldwork research described above included historical research of primary and secondary sources documenting the immigration process for adults and children in the Ukrainian American community. The study contained a variety of dimensions in the community. Data Sources reflected the variety and scope of the study. Analysis of these diverse ix data sets Involved 3' migranlcompallné‘ I. ramparts. finding ‘ezulatlrlg provrde: TEE—Eleni COHVGTSBUC :ypercelvrng COP-.5 rrtsrp'etatons about 71F data was organaz 3365 OI data. findlnc hdiigs into cateoo-re irchgs, ‘ Anai‘y'SiS IOCK 3310‘;th or fit fa ‘rSOIl'Jattems c w r v. I’ n' a-amlc and “it”? - " D'O'ridm f,” .\.i is thrOE "‘5 V... Hal 1 “A ‘1' S the rr- data sets involved the generation and refinement of assertions by means of constant comparing of data sources, looking for information about the actions of participants, finding artifacts that pertain to the immigrant community, and noting relevant conversations within the community. Thoughtfully processing the data by perceiving, comparing, contrasting, collecting, ordering, connecting, and speculating provided the ability to construct and test theories, hypotheses, and interpretations about the data, to inform the study. For the purpose of analysis, the data was organized and classified initially into systematic groupings of similar types of data, finding patterns in the data and then organizing those patterns and findings into categories that helped to describe, explain, and interpret the data findings. Analysis took place in three stages, called, “item“, “pattern“, and “structure.” “Items” included concrete, tangible, and specific information and units of data. “Patterns” consisted of categories or groupings of items that relate to each other or fit together into a pattern. “Structures” were composed of larger groups of patterns. Sometimes a relationship between patterns helped to form or eXplain a theory or hypothesis about the phenomena. This study was grounded in ethnographic and constructivist perspectives. The constant comparative approach provided inductive analysis of data, allowing data to be considered in 'ayers, and this approach facilitated interpretation of the study. Culture was a principal lens through which identity formation was observed and studied in the Community, as the immigrants became literate. (LeCompte and Schensul, 1999. p. 66.) The analysrs and test inlerpretat . constrictirlst theo', “he study. The t: death. which me] he world is construc EIEDEF U‘r’EI a peer; {her ear. ‘Constructs' L x-vstoct is a come “étsrou image on: close-we“ (Poiansky EDS. Immigration EEK! "Hr r .m.l..gat‘=on prt “Eli'ation DTOCes. I I0 AmGQCa i, M Ugr: ' V 'I‘r 3 ..art AmEHCaR that . 2M2, ' “'I: . U Try VVITI][FI :? "5 (:35 1 ailon The analysis also used extant theoretical models and literature to inform and test interpretations. For example, socio—cultural theory, or social- constructivist theory informed the research and provided a conceptual framework for the study. The term “constructivist” was used to indicate a social construction of reality, which means that what participants know and believe to be true about the world is constructed, or created and built, as people interacted with one another over a period of time in specific social settings (LeCompte and Schensul, 1999) “Constructs” used in the study explain concepts with greater detail. “A construct is a concept used to put together, to ‘construct,’ a mental model that helps you image unobservable processes presumed underlying events you can observe” (Polansky, 1991, p. 25). Two constructs used in the study are the terms, “immigration process” and “identity formation.” Several perspectives of the “immigration process” and “identity formation” informed the project. The immigration process began before the emigres left Ukraine, continued during the Ioumey to America, and included settling and becoming assimilated into the Ukrainian American community in Detroit. I argue that the immigrants who have come in previous times and who are still living in the existing immigrant community, within the United States, have helped to shape and form the Immigration process, or the process of emigration from the homeland, to immigration in the United States. This “immigration process” included the formation of identity and is influenced by the spirituality of the ethnic community. During the “immigration process,” it can be noted that within the Ukrainian xi wmmunrty, the ex: migrants coming retoong or ‘srtua: oer.- ted in the Ukr- hlo immigrants or c Doses of learning tare tecently Come I twat lon' took page e ‘or hose who left totes facilitated lC semistul contrzbl.‘ Bidenmi‘ IOr-rn, “imam exil’iath community, the existing community members mentored or scaffolded the new immigrants coming to the established Ukrainian community. The process of mentoring or “situated learning,” as described by Lave and Wenger (1991) can be noted in the Ukrainian immigrant community. Those who could be considered ”old immigrants” or second and third generation immigrants facilitated the process of learning in a new situation for the “new immigrants” or for those who have recently come to the community from Ukraine. In the process, “identity formation” took place for the immigrants who remained in the community as well as for those who left the community of Ukrainian Americans. This mentoring process facilitated identity formation and helped new immigrants to become successful contributing Ukrainian Americans while living in the community. “Identity formation” was another construct used in this study. This term was used to explain the process that began as new immigrants settled in the Ukrainian American community and found their own uniqueness and individuality as a Ukrainian American. In this community, Ukrainian culture and spirituality are a part of daily life. New immigrants who became a part of this community embraced the existing characteristics of the cultural and spiritual ways of life for Ukrainian Americans. The process of coming to America as a Ukrainian and becoming a literate Ukrainian American is called “identity formation” in this study. There are implications for this study that can lead to further research in the field of education of immigrants, for bilingual education of immigrants, and for r esearch on networks and communities of immigrants as ethnic groups. Immigrants in general, throughout the United States, are currently educated in xii totswe and/or ex; schools Public an: Some of the currer‘, and heated debate: he educataon ol er‘." $733885. largely due "5391399 Dcputa‘. 3T“: IU‘VIGQS e‘v‘ICE' L iv“. in" .3 the saze o‘ as to national start-r ~51qu 3111‘. ”3: , ;5 use the Cu »tt.-ation to learn r“. gafis as the” {in " at a Damn. .l. kLrhic W‘- b0th t h, 'cfi: ..hartce of is \I [I :‘p, '~ . A. . S IS Carrie inclusive and/or exclusive settings within elementary and secondary American schools. Public and private schools educate immigrants in a variety of ways. Some of the current methods for instruction have come under criticism. Strong and heated debates about immigrant education include the topic of finances for the education of immigrants and there is political rhetoric about the education process, largely due to the demands placed on the public education system where large populations of immigrants exist. My research informs this debate and provides evidence to support bilingual education of immigrants in private educational settings. As such, it enlightens the current reform discourse including the size of schools, the relation of schools to local communities as well as to national standards, and the ways that private schools (religious and charter) might infuse the curriculum with social or spiritual values enhancing students’ motivation to learn. There is also debate about the use of ESL or bilingual instruction for immigrants as they learn English in schools within the United States. This study looks at a particular, local approach to language and literacy education that is infused with both the value of and the practice of Standard English, as well as maintenance of the home language, or Ukrainian. This blend of the two Ianguages is carried out during learning, especially by means of intergenerational networks, in Ukrainian American homes, and in the Ukrainian Catholic Church. I n this study, the Ukrainian American elementary and high school can be viewed as a strategic research site because its model has apparently succeeded by a developed system of education for immigrants that has proven successful for xiii over 40 years. The titers. doctors a: Floaily. this s at: third generate" Exooean Immig'ar seated and regard threw Europe an sad-oes made the" regents as outs :e‘m the work of Eroeean immigrar “anst'eam' US l; Meier. unlike th. "m t i migrant)” w 5915' 5'. Emmy have bQAF tit. . wag: ‘ . by the iai: ( a‘l“: ,‘ 9:73th me e L10," “35.31: i i. 'L leaVe the ‘36 Us ~41 ”lites. its is. Of" 'ay 00an over 40 years. The Ukrainian Catholic High School has a 100% graduation rate and most of the graduates go on to major universities, completing degrees as lawyers, doctors, accountants, and other professional careers. Finally, this study affords a way to think about the experiences of second and third generation immigrants and new or first generation, immigrants. Eastern European immigrants entering the US in the early twentieth century were often isolated and regarded as less able than earlier immigrants who came from Northern Europe and the British Isles. The language, politics, and religious practices made them seem (like other Eastern and Southern European immigrants) as outsiders, less able to succeed in school, and less able to perform the work of an educated citizenry. Like many of their peers, Eastern European immigrants contradicted these beliefs by assimilating into “mainstream” US language, politics, and socioeconomic life of Americans. However, unlike the history of other countries whose émigrés flooded the US until immigration was greatly limited in 1920, Ukrainians not only assimilated but, several generations later, in the late twentieth century and early twenty-first Century, have become “new immigrants.” Reflecting social and political changes Shaped by the fall of communism and the break-up of the USSR into discrete and independent nations, Ukrainians now have the option and in many cases the desire to leave their homeland for Ukrainian American communities, especially in Iarge US cities. As a result, like many other immigrant groups the Ukrainians coming to the US today come for many of the reasons that their forbears came. However, xiv te r are Joined t his I"' tatln Al'l lei Ica a?” ”run. AU” ser 5 nc ya ts I they are joined this time not by Poles, Jews, Italians, and Greeks, but by people from Latin America and the Pacific Rim. They are not greeted at Ellis Island among other speakers of strange sounding languages and practitioners of strange looking script, but they arrive at airports in many US cities and are often met by second and third generation Ukrainian Americans who have become full participants in American life — its language and institutions. XV UST OF FIGURES lllTRODUCTION The Dance . Research A; Dissertation CHAPTER 1 In the Begin Pursurng the Description 0 Educational Rationaée for | Theoretica: Fl Studying Lani Data Sources PafllCtpants AnaIYSIS and CHAPTER 2 Life in 3 Ukr; Mikhails SiC' HESIOW and Ir mmaCUiafe (E lCUC Gfamm Imp‘uicmate. c Gimmes. Ate pi JCSafihat l faces in. the :HApTER 3 G." ‘- y TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES I NTRODUCTION The Dance between Two Worlds Research Approach Dissertation Overview CHAPTER 1 In the Beginning Pursuing the Dream of Education Description of the Dissertation Study Educational Ethnography Rationale for the Study Theoretical Framework for this Study Studying Language, Community, and Culture Data Sources Setting and Context Participants Analysis and Findings CHAPTER 2 Life in a Ukrainian American Community Mikhail’s Story History and Immigration Emigrating from Ukraine Immaculate Conception Ukrainian Catholic Church lCUC Grammar School Immaculate Conception Ukrainian Catholic High School Activities, Athletics, and School Accomplishments St. Josaphat Ukrainian Catholic Church Places in the Ukrainian Community Network Ukrainian People CHAPTER 3 Ukrainian American Literate Ildentity Helen's Story Ukrainian and English Language Practices Language learning and the social ecology of the community Learning Register and Genre by Participation Learning in Russia and America Ukrainian Immigrants Becoming Literate Americans Learning Language and Culture in America xvi xviii (33-5-3 11 13 13 16 18 28 34 35 37 4O 46 46 51 56 58 62 64 68 72 73 76 80 8O 84 85 86 89 94 98 Learnlng Or:I Negotiating r CHAPTER 4 Then and Nr Elena‘s Steal Educataon a“ lmmaculate C Then: 191‘ Now: 203: Then and N: The Role of {I The Role of it The Role of :l CHAPTER 5 RuShnyky in Raimagininl RUSDnyky CWepfs of l Kialnlan CU Ukrainian 8y. Ukrainian Arr SHITI’TER e What Weht r- isseriaIIOn l OCIO‘CUiiura eSEarch FlI' OmmUley- TABLE OF CONTENTS Learning Oral and Written Language Practices 102 Negotiating a Ukrainian American Literate Identity 105 CHAPTER 4 Then and Now: Shifting Roles of Language and Culture 108 Elena’s Story 108 Education and Immigrants Then: 1900 to 1936 118 Immaculate Conception Schools: Then and Now 126 Then: 1917 to 1963 126 Now: 2000 to 2002 127 Then and Now: Culture, Traditions and Rituals 129 The Role of the Church 133 The Role of the School 136 The Role of the Community 139 CHAPTER 5 Rushnyky in Detroit: Remembering, Remaking, and Re-Imagining Cultural Identity 142 Rushnyky 142 Concepts of Culture 152 Ukrainian Culture and Spirituality 153 Ukrainian Symbolism and Culture 159 Ukrainian American Cultural and Spiritual Identity 165 CHAPTER 6 What went right? Revisiting the Patterns for Success 172 Dissertation Review 173 Socio-cultural Theoretical Framework 175 Research Findings 177 Creating a Ukrainian American Community 179 Community: Similar Culture and Language 182 Community: Family and Relatives 184 Community: Economic Success and Education 185 Seven Major Outcomes 189 Research Results 192 Implications for Future Research 196 Conclusions 199 A PPENDICES 202 Ref-1'5 RENCES 233 xvii FIGURE 1 Data Source I FIGURE 2 SocioCultc' FIGURE 3 Matrix for Ba FIGURE 1 Types of Da‘ FIGURE 5 Enghsh and FIGURE 5 WQISIUD Se FIGURE'I Survey Que FIGURE 8 Artifacts LIST OF FIGURES FIGURE 1 Data Sources and Participants FIGURE 2 . Socio-Cultural Theory Conceptual Framework FIGURE 3 Matrix for Data Collection FIGURE 4 Types of Data and Kinds of Analyses FIGURE 5 English and Ukrainian Parents' Language Level of Fluency FIGURE 6 Worship Services English and Ukrainian FIGURE 7 Survey Questions F IGU RE 8 Artifacts FlGURE 9 Cover Terms for Artifacts Fl GURE 10 Participants I: l (SURE 1 1 Development of Ukrainian Catholic Churches and Schools Detroit and Suburb 1913-2002 FIGURE 12 History of Grade School 1917 - 1964 Itic? URE 13 Names and Dates of Spiritual Leaders xviii 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 FlGUREII Survey Self- Language P FIGURE 15 Idenlzty ~10.“ FIGURE 16 Places In the FIGURE 17 Places in the FlGURE 18 Ukrainian H, FIGURE 19 Ukrainian H. FlGURI: 20 Donations fc 82000000 | FlGURE 21 Ukialnlan H! LIST OF FIGURES FIGURE14 Survey Self-Report Data on English and Ukrainian Language Proficiency of Parents in the Community FIGURE 15 Identity — formation as literate Americans FIGURE 16 Places in the Ukrainian Community 1963 and 2002 FIGURE 17 Places in the Ukrainian Community 1963 and 2002 FIGURE 18 Ukrainian High School Program of Courses 1963 FIGURE 19 Ukrainian High School Curriculum 2002 FIGURE 20 Donations for ICUCS Building Project 2002 $2,000,000 Needed FiGURE 21 Ukrainian High School Accomplishments 2002 xix 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 is... A past we rml’tr n‘ l has he wti‘. a t hean‘. the: INTRODUCTION The Dance between Two Worlds The process of immigration has changed dramatically several times during the past century for all immigrants, no matter where their place of origin. Immigrants in this study have faced these changes by negotiating their place in life with a foot in the homeland and a foot in the new land upon immigration. This meant that Ukrainian immigrants in this study had a foot in two worlds: Ukraine and the United States. Dinnerstein and Reimers (1975) have noted that between 1880 and 1930 the United States received 27 million immigrants. Significant numbers of emigrants from Southern and Eastern EurOpe immigrated to America during this time in spite of adverse circumstances due to immigration restriction laws and a major depression in the United States. Many peOple from Russia came to the United States since the 1880’s, but they were not considered or counted as a separate group. Instead, Russian emigrants were clumped with the European emigrants, leaving Russian immigrants without a voice and without consideration for their unique culture, language, and spirituality. Russian Jews in particular were restricted in their lives when in Russia and forced to live in the pale of Settlement, which was a region stretching from the Baltic Sea to the B lack Sea, This area is now Poland, Lithuania, and Ukraine. Many Russians living in the Pale of Settlement between 1899 and 1910 emigrated from Russia to the United States. Many (67%) of the Russian Jews who Came as immigrants, came to America with trade skills such as carpentry, s”C>el"'"léiking, painting, and butchering. These skills were learned and practiced in the Russian Pale of Settlement and the skills were used in the United States within the Russian immigrant communities. Today, those immigrants coming from this area in Russia are called Ukrainians. A significant number of immigrants now come with professional and technical skills, education, and some knowledge of the English language. Foner (2001) divides today's immigrants into two camps: those who come with little education and training and those who come with specialized skills and college degrees. This “human capital” or the resource of human labor and the positive additions made to the American society that contemporary immigrants bring to the United States is also found in the Ukrainian immigrant community. Yet, with so many immigrants from Ukraine who were added to the professional work force in America, their numbers were not counted as Ukrainians, or even counted as Russians, until the last decade. They were considered Europeans or “Other” when categorized. The story of Ukrainian i mmigration has been without a voice for over a century. Most Ukrainian i mmigrants were counted with Southern and Eastern Europe, with Slavic groups. or with Russian Jews. The voices of Ukrainians have been silenced and ignored for many years. It is my intention that this research about Ukrainian immigrants W5 1' Provide a voice for Ukrainians, and bring the process of Ukrainian Immigration into the ongoing conversation about immigration. Immigrants from many different countries experience emigration from their homeland and immigration to the United States in a unique and individual way. Howe Ve r. there are similarities between many immigrant experiences that help us to understand I mess that is net between the two is Fonts ‘r‘Ih'ne s stu Cornenrlle man m arcs or In the w tot: wonos at on: terns-en them, If age as a success If- dlSITlCI. If he a Conennile but be: In this stud; new to better imam for Ultra Dead? included DEL ' . “migration prt 359" n 6.ce_ during he VIP-i... r v 1:: Si flies, and us to understand the immigration process. Yet, immigrants are not aware of the process that is needed when they first arrive in this country. The “dance” between the two worlds has been explained in other studies, such as William F cote Whyte’s study, Street Comer Society (1973, p. 273), “To get ahead, the Cornerville man must move either in the world of business and Republican politics or in the world of Democratic politics and the rackets. He cannot move in both worlds at once; they are so far apart that there is hardly any connection between them. If he advances in the first world, he is recognized by society at large as a successful man, but he is recognized in Cornerville only as an alien to the district. If he advances in the second world, he achieves recognition in Cornerville but becomes a social outcast to respectable people elsewhere." In this study, I entered the “dance" between worlds as a participant— observer to better understand the process of immigration during identity formation for Ukrainian immigrants becoming literate in the United States. My research included unique perspectives and views to the identity formation during the immigration process. One view included a history of the immigrant experience, during segments of time from the late 18003 to the present. Each time segment related to changes in the immigration laws and policies of the L1 nited States, and the changing process of emigrating from Ukraine and "'71 migrating to the United States. General information about immigration was Compared to specific information about Ukrainian immigration to better Under Sta nd the process and to give voice to those coming from Ukraine to the United States, who had been left out of the previous conversation. (DeLaet, 233 l. (Dinnersfe 233i). (Daniels. 1E Another we migration proces 393 were broug it mommy was Ch :3 supgomve Ukre fie-education that feel Ukrainan firsgrants were 2 3,2355 and the C 1‘»?- a V v‘ A ‘ V ~58 OI :n‘p- Z L '5‘ “~23! . 3_ 13'! {Q . “S US w; . :3 miter,“ .‘N' .“+,h' 1 “'3 Cd'l'j 2000), (Dinnerstein and Reimers, 1975, 1999), (Portes and Rumbaut, 1996, 2001), (Daniels, 1991). Another view included the nature of the identity formation during the immigration process. As many Ukrainian immigrants came to the United States, they were brought into an existing community of Ukrainian Americans. This community was characterized by participation in the Ukrainian Catholic Church, by supportive Ukrainian social networks within the Ukrainian community, and by the education that was received in Ukrainian Catholic Schools also supported by several Ukrainian Catholic Churches within the extended community. The immigrants were a part of the Ukrainian community during the immigration process and the community helped to form a literate identity for each immigrant. Research Approach Ethnography is a research approach to learning about the social and cultural life of people in a local setting (LeCompte and Schensul, 1999). The goal of this educational ethnography was to learn about the social and cultural l ife of the Detroit Ukrainian American community to be able to better understand the process of immigration and the process of identity formation for Ukrainian i mmlgrants in the Detroit community. Observation and interviewing were two critical activities used during the study to form ethnographic theory. Constructing Meanings. interpretation, and associations or theories that are significant for the Community provided a way for the conceptual framework to develop. The “male 810033933 fireman comma ' r‘r'“ E1530?) 3+ and a pfOCESS ‘0', I ‘o'fhrs study FDC-Lr Are'ican comm...” i I y - «2'9" oegrrre n t. .c— Dé'oc? of two yeah ,_ ”‘4qu and 3' A. v 3:? o: o‘- .- ~ V' -3? _. . “it“ ”Mar A ‘ V ‘b‘al “ ~\ 3" *4. . H Iii-C a V' . i r ,- a!’ lo q .3, ' " l ("z-r“ , t,“ V3.2}; h 52:.“ ‘ v. ultimate ethnographic objective was to condense social and cultural reality in the Ukrainian community to produce a coherent description of the community. Ethnography has historically been considered both a product of research and a process for research (LeCompte & Preissle, 1993). Products of research for this study included interpretive stories and narratives about the Ukrainian American community. The process of research included face-to-face interactions with people in the community using ethnographic tools for data collection over a period of two years. In Addition, background information and historical primary and secondary source materials were added to the artifacts collected as part of the research process. To restrict the focus for the study specific lenses were used on particular aspects of the community. One lens for this study focused on the Ukrainian Catholic Churches in the Community, one lens focused on the Ukrainian Catholic Schools in the Community, and one lens focused on the Ukrainian American community. Observation field notes, interviews with participants, a survey, historical info rmation and materials, and artifacts provided data for the ethnographic study. Th is study was carried out in a natural setting within the Ukrainian community AS a participant observer, l was able to provide an accurate reflection of particular perspectives and behaviors for participants in the community ‘nductive, interactive, and recursive data collection along with analytic strategies provided a way to construct cultural theories in this local setting. To provide a Circumspect view of the community the study included organizing the data as it Was collected and creating groups of data for analysis. During analysis, revisiting rte data and tra" .. ‘7‘; :Cranlt'y m LI v This 3555’ I” ma’) Ar‘e.’ C "IE“ 0f the £2me tetra: on 85% essences tc or sea at the .35 the study about t same of the Segtrrnrng. Neg: iii-fetter. lmmrg 53: Culture. Rue Ltrral Identity. Chapter 1 Escrption of the .M , “my and t 5r, .. .6431 hOW U .n I. um?! The 3; edgikvi immlara the data and triangulating the data provided a circumspect examination of the community in the study. Dissertation Overview This dissertation has six chapters that together reflect a view of the Detroit Ukrainian American immigrant community. Each chapter highlights a different view of the community. Vignettes, poetry and quotations add richness to the information about the community and each narrative provides personal experiences to deepen the panorama of the community. Chapters include a review of the literature used for the chapter, information and data collected during the study about the topic of the chapter and together the chapters provide a la ndscape of the research for the dissertation. Chapter titles include: In the Beginning; Negotiating a Ukrainian American Literate Identity; Life in a Ukrainian American Immigrant Community; Then and Now: Shifting Roles of Language and Culture; Rushnyky in Detroit: Remembering, Remaking, and Re-lmagining C u ltural Identity; and What Went Right? Revisiting the Patterns for Success. Chapter 1 focused on the beginnings of the study and provided a description of the dissertation. Chapters 2 - 5, each, contain a detailed look at the separate parts of the study. Chapter 2 introduced the Ukrainian immigrant Community and how community life developed over the years. Chapter 3 explained how Ukrainian immigrants formed a literate identity while living in the Community. The chapter also tells of the provisions for educating Ukrainian Catholic immigrants and how the growing numbers of students in the community expanded the We thawed the shrfir community from tt Erglsh and Ukrar Chapter 5 focuses .tttacts. such as he Ukrainian Ame 3:: out the sport; seamed for dece hatter provided ; Ishuh'ty ptOVldr “333% to sucee Sirtual life of the ‘55 Chapters in CC Eire, expanded the educational system in this Ukrainian Catholic community. Chapter 4 viewed the shifting roles of language and culture in the community. The community from the beginning chose to be decidedly bi-lingual, by providing English and Ukrainian languages throughout the church, school, and community. Chapter 5 focused on cultural identity for Ukrainian immigrants in Detroit. Artifacts, such as rushnyky, which are ritual cloths, were highlighted as a part of the Ukrainian American museum. Chapter 6 revisited the findings for the study and put the spotlight on the patterns for success that were developed and sustained for decades in the Detroit Ukrainian American community. Each chapter provided a window into the community and the rich details offered by the community provided a story of how the community began and how they have m a naged to successfully educate immigrants and pass on the culture and Spiritual life of the Ukrainian Catholic Church for more than one century. The chapters in concert convey and answer the research question, How does the experience of a new immigrant group unfold when there are already ties to the homeland, its language and religion, awaiting its members? This- he began our”); dream was pie-”YE I otsened my tam ' tesre began whe hostant compans: art any other time torts were read to sited in me a icy. tot he to the loca‘ tsfooolr I checked o'oertul experiehc‘ ”rear-d is to this oa3 The: for books ar Teharacters and t! litteriound a Corie r nfile roclrer ant During most h w esurrounding [ tar tlyUkrairrran E CHAPTER 1 In the Beginning Every story seems to begin with “once upon a time,” and my once upon a time began during my childhood with the dream of pursuing an education. This dream was planted in my heart by my grandmother and my parents as I observed my family living with a foot in two worlds: America and Ukraine. The desire began when my parents read aloud to me every day. Books became a constant companion especially each night before going to bed, in the car on trips and any other time there was a minute to spare. One or more of my favorite books were read to me each day. From my earliest recollection my father instilled in me a love for reading, writing, and learning. At the age of three he took me to the local library and made sure I received my first library card. The Fi rst book I checked out of the library was about Papa Small and with that Wonderful experience with books, I was hooked! Reading became a passion for me and is to this day. My father said, “Books are your friends,” and I had great reSpect for books and always held them in great esteem. I felt a connection to the characters and the stories I read, always keeping my books close to me. Mether found a collection of music with stories that were read aloud and so I sat in my little rocker and listened to the stories and music I loved for hours on end. During most holidays, our Ukrainian traditions were included in the Celebrations. The attention of my family turned to the Ukrainian Catholic Church and the surrounding Detroit Ukrainian community each holiday in the church Yea r. My Ukrainian Baba, my grandmother, spoke Ukrainian and very little T1 T...) up was as lama mg. n of. ”it Ll: CU Sit “'4“! _ w“ ‘z'k English. She celebrated Christmas in a Ukrainian way which meant Christmas was celebrated in January, not December. Our Ukrainian Christmas began in January and the holiday was called “Little Christmas” by my family. Baba brought a Christmas tree home on the traditional December 24 Christmas Eve and the family gathered to decorate the tree, baking cookies and making food for our own “Little Christmas.” The excitement of our Ukrainian Christmas continued for many days after December 25. It was great to still feel the joy of the holiday when we opened our Christmas gifts and celebrated our own holiday in January long after everyone else had taken down the Christmas tree and celebrated the traditional January 1New Year. Soon after the Christmas tree was taken down sometime in January, Baba began to make pysanky, or Ukrainian Easter eggs. Easter was the most im portant holiday in our family and in the Ukrainian Catholic Church. The Ce Iebration began the first day of Lent and lasted 40 days. Making pysanky was a Spiritual experience and an expression of the Ukrainian Catholic faith. Blessings were said for each egg and then small cups were used to hold the p‘ant and mineral dyes used for coloring the eggs. Wax lines were drawn on the eggshells and each egg was fully decorated with colorful patterns. Rhythm, t>alamce, space, and graphic placement of colorful Ukrainian designs meant that the process took several days. Baba finished egg making before Holy Thursday, the week just before Easter Sunday. When eggs were completed they were p'aced in a large bowl, warmed in the oven to melt the wax, and then each egg Was wiped with a clean cloth to remove the wax. She worked night and day to make sure that 3393 d59d trad made sure that 3995 th at were Saturday eve b Another :éa‘hs that ads :la‘t‘ns, were us endows as Cl. Ukrainian rcon sea-e table tn tt E‘Gl were p33; tencnes of v head tn a ha mat. cloths w» “*4 . Way’s and ‘ay Of life, make sure that everyone in the family would receive some of her eggs for Easter. Baba used traditional Ukrainian designs for each egg and every Easter Baba made sure that the grandchildren were given an Easter basket filled with a dozen eggs that were blessed by the priest at Immaculate Conception Church the Saturday eve before Easter. Another Ukrainian tradition that Baba kept alive was to make embroidered cloths that adorned most everything in her home. Rushnyky, or Ukrainian ritual cloths, were used in the kitchen as table cloths or they were used to decorate the windows as curtains. Rushnyky could be found in the living room draped over a Ukrainian icon on the wall, or a rushnyk might be used as a doily to decorate a side table in the living room. Baba even used rushnyky in the bedroom, where they were placed on her dresser and over the headboard of her bed. I have fond memories of watching Baba make rushnyky. She carried her many colors of th read in a handbag and the handbag went everywhere she did. Her beautiful ritual cloths were given to me and to all of her children and grandchildren for our bi rthdays and other special events. Rushnyky became a part of our Ukrainian Way of life. Each tradition and cultural event seemed to encourage and nurture my dream. As an adult I began to have questions about how my grandmother and my family became Ukrainian American. When did Baba come to America? Where did she live and how did she support herself? She spoke Ukrainian and Only knew a few English words, even though she lived to be 99 years old. How did she survive without speaking the native tongue of this country? How did my 10 tamer learn to afferent last n Amenwn? W *ese questror gaduate scho Urrarne many My dree izsapllne of a? Raenael in the lit. deTar. 20!‘ etfatrOgraphy. ‘S’e iterary Cir 2242’s.:- F lorro-F :szp included 21‘ .34 + jun Les for ‘ 73L: 4 l "030ml 5: tea. . ,3 Wtth the AS pa'tlc father learn to fluently speak, read, and write English? Why did my father have a different last name than my grandmother and aunt? How did my family become American? What is the process of becoming American for immigrants? All of these questions primed the pump and led to pursuing the answers through graduate school. And so the dream of education that began with my family in Ukraine many years ago became reality for me and for my family, in America. Pursuing the Dream of Education My dream continued as I pursued graduate work and learned of the discipline of anthropology. Through the work of Susan F lorio-Ruane and Taffy Ra phael in their research on teacher book clubs (see, for example, Florio-Ruane with deTar, 2001). l was able to participate in learning about culture, a utobiography, and literacy. As a graduate student, for two years I was a part of the Literary Circle. This was a voluntary teacher book club developed out of a Cou rse Florio-Ruane taught on “Culture, Literacy, and Autobiography." The Qro up included experienced teachers from several local school districts who were Candidates for the Masters Degree in Literacy and four doctoral students. The four doctoral students, along with Susan Florio-Ruane and Taffy Raphael, Worked with the teachers in the Literary Circle for two years. As participant observers, our project was to select and read autobiographies, meeting monthly to discuss connections of these books to culture, literacy, and our own lives as teachers. As we read autobiographies. we '00ked for ways to connect our own learning about literacy with our personal ll cultural histories teachers to unde trection. We I grant and also t Glazier. McVee Tris experience lrrny family his? orthe lite and tr Noteve: ton and be the lime and hOV attsblography . 031i: provide a :"jfic‘tEd a Dr Egan to plan r i=5: ra ' “h t0 Stu 337:“ ”Um! CO." 4:. WUman be; 5. “z r- ties and | cultural histories. This group also worked to learn how autobiography could help teachers to understand culture and in turn help children through literacy instruction. We had opportunities to study the learning of the teachers within the group and also to write and reflect upon our own learning (FIorio-Ruane, 2001; Glazier, McVee, Wallace-Cowell, Shellhorn, Florio-Ruane, and Raphael, 2000). This experience, combined with my already strong interest in literacy and culture in my family history prompted my serious consideration of a dissertation focused on the life and literacy learning of Ukrainian Americans. Not everyone has a cultural community like the one in this study to learn from and be mentored by, but everyone can increase an understanding about cu lture and how it relates to students in the public school system. Through the a utobiography work, I realized that using an anthropological lens in research (:0 uld provide a way to pursue questions about my family. I designed and Conducted a one year pilot study and then at the end of the year long study I began to plan my dissertation research. My decision to use ethnographic research to study the process of literacy and learning in one Ukrainian American Community comes from the realization that ethnography takes a scientific position that human behavior and the ways that people construct and find meaning in t"Ieir lives and in their worlds are locally specific and highly variable. This means that the method allowed me to investigate the Detroit Ukrainian American Community in terms of the specific values and a way of living Ukrainian culture that are uniquely their own. Ethnography assumes that researchers need to first discover what people are doing and the reasons that they themselves give for their actions b taols provrde ; and SChultZ. ‘ 1999; Scher‘s The a‘ 303318 fll'ldrr‘ asking the q: their actions before we can analyze and interpret their actions. Ethnogrpahic tools provide a design for discovery and exploration. (Erickson, 1985; Erickson and Schultz, 1981; Hammersly and Atkinson, 1995; LeCompte and Schensul, 1999; Schensul, et al, 1999) ‘ Description of the Dissertation Study The aforementioned one year pilot study prefigured the dissertation study and the findings of the pilot work became a strong foundation, a starting place for asking the questions and planning the study that would become the dissertation research. So much was already in place and the logical next step for the dissertation research was to continue in the same fashion with a larger ed ucational ethnography study. My dissertation research began with a desire to study the texts, e>1<1110me cny>1<611* Ta UJKIIIbHI knacuf. i aHrnii’ICbkmo i yrrpai'ucskmo. Lle“ BHB‘ICHH’I* M0>111<11101or3 cny>1<611* Ta UJKIJIblti 1013011“, U10 powoemuotfi Hetpopmanbuo” 3* oco6aM11 Ta l‘pynaMrI’“ npo" pi31111x" moueii" uocainy M810“: 3 1011 tlac, 11K" y* 060301101013 cny>1<611* Ta UJKIJIbIIi K.lIEICII*. [311* MO)KCT€ Ta1<0>1<* 6yr11* nonpomeui” nmamm“ y* HerbopManbuomy" iHTepB'ro U10"‘ crliororparliylori. MeHlIJe, HDK onHy r0111111y, Ta i111<01111* aynio-taping ninnbnocri 6y11yT1. 311K0p11CT03y331‘11c3". A611* BHKOHaTH 3113qu131”, BaLU* 1103301 snmaracrbcn’l‘ 1U06 sayaamrru" 3ac* IIIII ‘I21C* o6o>1<1110€Te cny>1<611* Ta UJKIJIbHI Knacn" Ta U106 pomoemm" 3 3mm“ np0* Balui“ HOCBIII. ilk-1110* 1111* willing 33am yqaCTb y llbOMy nocnimkeHHi, 63/113 nacxa ninnUUlin (Doprvry’l‘ 3r01111" 1121* 11am yrmiii’“ cmpinui“. Bynb nacxa nomauai’ne” 3013111111“ nonpocwm” 6y111>-11111<1110cte cny>1<611* Ta 1111111111111 1013011” anrnificskmo Ta prai'HCLKi. 811* nouylm” U10 Ms*. Shellhorn“ poarrtnnac’f tle” 311311e111151‘ 63111“ mo 3113336“ Harona" Ta UJJTSIX* Kpaute 3po3yMi10T1. 1m kyanypy Ta M03y aneuennfi. * agreeing 333m yuaCTb. Ms*. Shellhorn” tayeamme“ Bac“ niu uac” Ulkinblmx KnaciB’l‘ "in/1160* o60>1<1110€Te crly>1<611*, npocme" iHTep3'1o 3 3aM11*. 6epeTe* HanncaHi np11MiTk11*, 6epCTe“ ditiri’il-parllii“. Ta BUKopUCTaHHn“ aynio-taping. Ms“. Shellhorn“ 3a3>1<1111 3111<0p11CTac* IICCBllOHiM 11ml“ 331.110’1'* 11111311" o611113a y* llaHHX* 30113 3611pa€"‘ Ta n111uylm a6o* 1110 p03MOBJ1$|€* npo“ nocninxrcmm. flirt [1110* sacrepemeus“ BHBHCHHfl* 6y11yTb 6paT11cs1“ 3* HOBOIDKCHHSIM CTpilikH“ Ta crhepa’“ np11MiT1<11* 3611* aaxncmm 3au1y* TBCMHiCTb*. Bci“ )10CJIiIlHHl1bKI* maTepiaJm“ 6y11yrb nepmamcn“ y* ilanii‘iliouy“ Micui“ Ta inumx" 111011101“ He 6y11yTb 11033one11i U106 poarmmym a6o* 311k0p11CTa111111’l‘ 1111* 601 6e3nocepe111130ro“ Hernany“. K0113 nonoeiub“ [1331* npo" 31131113111111’“. ue’l' 6y11e 3113* HOCJIIJI‘IKCIIIIH 1160* 31110133811113 meTa“, Ta 31(111oqa'rb" TIIIbKH* 06M611r<* 33U11<3311e11e y* Kynbtypuomy ilOCBillI Ullx \ 10 6epyTb leaCTb. Lle* BHB‘ICHHSI* 310110111113” 33y33>111<33Horo YHiBepc11TeTy* Ta 3cic’1’* thbOpMaui'i 6y11e nepmamca“ KompirteHUiiilllifi’“. 11106 1110011111'“ ue“ 311311e111111*, 33U13* yc113 3ro113 n01pe6yCTbcsr, U10 1136 11033111 6epyrb* np11Mi'rk-11“ Ta audiotape ninhbHiCTb. 811* He 306031133111 U106 333T" yqacn, y* 311311e11111’l‘, 13 331U3* ytlac'rs 113 110611031.'11,1iili* oc11031 1111mm”. 51KU10 311* rapamycre“ 3r011y, 33c* peaepe’“ np330* discontinue 331113“ 31130111 y’“ 3113qu111* 3 6y113-11K111’1 qac. ilkmo” 311* MaCTe 6ynb-11Ki* n11T3111111* np0* 311336111111”. TaK >111<3111c3* K011111111C1111ii‘1113’“. 811* 31.1111111’“ 1111.1} -1111 11 * Ueii” 11033111 3 6y113-111c111‘1 t13c. Date > _* H3333* y* print__ 211 Figure 1 Data Sources and Participants Data Sources Field notes Primary sources Interviews Surveys Artifacts Historical and cultural information Public records and miscellaneous information Participants Immaculate Conception Ukrainian Catholic Church St. Josaphat Ukrainian Catholic Church Immaculate Conception Ukrainian Catholic High School Ukrainian American Community, Detroit Michigan Ukrainian American Community, Suburbs FIGURE 2 Socio-Cultural Theory Conceptual Framework 1 Literate Identity 2 People Groups 3 Culture 4 Soc/Pol History 213 FIGURE 3 Matrix for Data Collection Data Setting Activities Participants Field notes Churches Worship Priests - Participant - ICUCC Services Congregational 1 Observation - St. Josaphat Members I ICUCHS Principal 1 Teachers I Students Community Community Members Interviews Both Churches Worship Services Priests - Lengthy Congregational - Brief Members I - Oral ICUCHS School Classes Principal Teachers Students Community Community Events Community Members _ Survey ICUCHS - School Classes Principal Immaculate Teachers Conception High Students School Parents Artifacts Ukrainian Worship Services Community - Church Bulletins American Members in - Photos Community In School Classes Detroit - Rushnyky Detroit and and Suburb - Pysanky Suburb Museum - Matryoshka - Texts Community Events - Audio Tapes Historical/Cultural - Europe Immigration MSU History Information - Russia Process Faculty - Primary Source - Ukraine Soc/Political Priests - Secondary - DetroitISuburb Events Principal Source Communities Identity Formation Community Members Public Records! - Europe Community Events Community Miscellaneous - Russia Church Events Members in Information - Ukraine School Events Detroit/Suburb - Detroit/Suburb Museum Communities Historical Events .2 _ _g 214 FIGURE 4 Types of Data and Kinds of Analyses Types of Data Kinds of Analyses Field notes - Participant Observation Collect data Organize items into groups Connect groups to find patterns Analyze and interpret patterns Interviews - Lengthy - Brief - Oral Collect data Organize into chronological groups Compare interviews Connect patterns to form structures Analyze and interpret structures Survey Collect data Organize by participant Organize by question numbers Compare questions across participants Connect patterns to form structures Organize structures into charts Analyze and interpret structures and charts Artifacts - Church Bulletins - Photos Collect data Organize into groups (Culture, Church, School, Community) - Rushnyky Compare data to form patterns - Pysanky Connect patterns to form structures - Matryoshka Analyze and interpret structures - Texts with other data sources Historical/cultural Collect data Information Organize into groups and find patterns - Primary Sources - Secondary Sources Connect patterns for form structures Analyze and interpret structures Public Records and Miscellaneous Information Collect data Organize into groups to find patterns Connect patterns to form structures Analyze and interpret structures 215 r! Inwcxm m mafia: nan aria»: rmaccmmo ro§20 3041mm. mZQPEI. .222..an ZOHIma sz...m_.= mm>D.ZQ .u>._....mx\ mzo...m..= mvm>§zm m>4Ima sz...w..= 55.4.20 .u>......m.£ szme. ”may—20 .scm Sci .5...” mcm 2:2 3...» 3041mm. me>.z.>2\ mvm>§20 3041mm. me>.z.>z. 52.4.20 2.0.2.5.». cxw>_z_>z. mm>0_20 m>._.Im_../< CXZ>.Z.>Z. mtm>§zm 1.9.2.53 CXW>.Z_>Z. 52.4.20 m>......m.~. CXW>.Z.>Z\ mm>U.ZO 216 FIGURE 6 Worship Services English and Ukrainian Time of ICUCC ICUCC St. Josaphat St. Josaphat Service Engfish Ukrainian English Ukrainian SATURDAY 7:00 AM Ukrainian 8:00 AM Ukrainian Ukrainian 4:00 PM English English SUNDAY 8:30 AM Ukrainian Ukrainian 10:00 AM Ukrainian Ukrainian 12:00 PM English English WEEKDAYS 7:00 AM Ukrainian Ukrainian 7:45 AM Ukrainian 8:00 AM Ukrainian HOLY DAYS 7:45 AM Ukrainian 8:00 AM Ukrainian 10:00 AM Ukrainian 7:00 PM English Ukrainian English SUMMER SATURDAY 8:00 AM Ukrainian Ukrainian 4:00 PM English English SUNDAY 9:00 AM Ukrainian Ukrainian 11:00 AM Egglish English WEEKDAYS 7:00 AM Ukrainian 7:45 AM Ukrainian 8:00 AM Ukrainian 9:00 AM Ukrainian HOLY DAYS 7:45 AM Ukrainian 8:00 AM Ukrainian 7:00 PM English English TOTALS ENGLISH UKRAINIAN ENGLISH UKRAINIAN 6 12 6 14 TOTAL ENG. 12 services TOTAL UKR. 26 services 217 N-s 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. 27. 28. 29. 30. 31. 32. 33. . Do you consider yourself to be Ukrainian? American? 35. 36. 37. 38. 39. 40. 41. 42. 43. FIGURE 7 Survey Questions What is your nationality? Where were you born? How long have you lived here? What is the nationality of your parents? Where were they born? Why did they move here? How many people are in your family? How old are they? Who lives at home? What do you do for a living? What is your level of education? What is the level of education of your parents? How fluent are you in Ukrainian? English? (Fluent, Good, Fair, Minimal) How fluent is your father in Ukrainian? English? How fluent is your mother in Ukrainian? English? . What do you like about school/church? What don’t you like? . What language do you speak at school/church? . How are your language experiences at school/church different from your language experiences at home? . Are there any activities that you do not participate in because of the language differences? Do you speak Ukrainian at home? Do you speak English at home? Which language is your primary language? Does school/church help you with your cultural or language practices in any way? When do you usually read, write, and/or speak Ukrainian? How is your home life different form or the same as your school/church life? What kinds of books do you usually read? How are you different from your parents? What do you think that the school/church community expects from you? In your opinion, how are those who speak Ukrainian the same or different from those who do not speak Ukrainian? In your opinion, are there any differences in the language practices of males and females? Are the language experiences at school/church for males and females the same or different? How is the community that surrounds the church the same or different from school or church? What kindsof social and school related activities do you participate in? What language do you usually speak and when? How long did it take you to learn to speak English/Ukrainian? How long did it take you to learn to write English/Ukrainian? What does “culture” mean to you? What was it like at school in Ukraine? How is school and church the same in the US as it was in Ukraine? What classes did you have in Ukraine? What did you learn about the Ukrainian culture in Ukraine? What did you learn about the Ukrainian culture in the US? How is your life different lsame from/as your parent’s at your age? What was life like in Ukraine? Do you have family members in Ukraine? Do they want to join you in the US? What do you know about your grandparent’s lives growing up? Where did they grow up? What do you want to do when you graduate from ICUHS? Do you want to go to college? Which college? What career would you like to pursue? 218 FIGURE 8 Artifacts Type of Artifact Source Importance Significance Textbook Participant High Cultural Gift Educational Yearbook Participant High Cultural Gift Historical Collected Spiritual Catechism Participant High Cultural Text Gift Educational Collected Historical Spiritual Booklets Found Average Cultural Historical Spiritual Photos Participant High Cultural Gift Historical Fabric Participant High Cultural (Rushnyky) 8. Gift Historical Crafts Collected Museum (Pysanky) Icons Found High Cultural Historical Spiritual Foods Found Average Cultural (Perishable) Historical Clothing Found Average Community To Cultural High Educational Historical Spiritual Music Found Average Community To Cultural High Educational Historical Spiritual Language Tapes Found Average Community Cultural Educaflonal Church Bulletins Found High Community Cultural Educaflonal Historical Spiritual Advertisements Found High Community Cultural Educaflonal Historical Spiritual Possible Found High Community Artifact Part. Gift Average Cultural Groupings Collected Low Educational Historical Museum Spiritual 219 FIGURE 9 Cover Terms for Artifacts How Artifacts are Used for Used in Used during Used Spiritual Life Daily Life Schooling in the Community Books, Booklets, Photos, Textbooks, Icons, Fabrics, Clothing, Music, Church Bulletins, Clothing, Foods, Advertisements, Advertisements, Icons, Catechism Text, Textbooks, Crafts, Language Clothing, Fabric, Foods, Tapes, Types of Artifacts Music, Art, Advertisements Art, Crafts, Photos, Icons Foods, Yearbooks 220 FIGURE 10 Participants Name Community Church Student Alumni Faculty Mikhail Maria Danyil Marta Chrystyna Mr. Klym Elena Svitlana Mykola Peter Volodia Natalia Tatiana Anastasia Oksana Renee Steve Tryna Rose Adriana Andrew Martha Nichlas Total 23 axxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx axxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx axxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 22] FIGURE 1 1 Development of Ukrainian Catholic Churches and Schools Detroit and Suburb 1913-2002 FIRST SCHOOL ICGS 1936 Ukr. House Basilian Order Slsters K-12 ICUCA ICUCC 2002 Construction N9E4V3 ' 1 . ”1.12.1.1? BUILDING Detroit FIRST CHURCH ICUCS 2002 “3”“ FIRST HIGH Elementary, 1913 SCHOOL Middle, Detroit ICUHS HighSchool form academy 1959 in suburb Detroit ICUHS NEW 1999 CHURCH Moves to St. Josaphat Suburb 1985 Suburb FIGURE 12 History of Grade School 1917-1964 Location Date Number of Type of Teachers Students School Ukr. House 1917 Evening/Religion Church on Grayling & History cantors St. Ukr. House 1928 Evening/Religion Sisters of St. on Grayling 8 History Basil the Great St. In Ukrainian 1936 18 Parochial day Sisters House schooll 2 K-8 classes In Ukrainian 1938 50 K8 Sisters House In Ukrainian 1939 108 K-8 Sisters House In Ukrainian 1940 114 K-8 Sisters House New School 1951 K-8 Sisters Near ICUCC School 1952 20 8th gr graduates 5 sisters Building School 1952-53 355 Sept. K-8 Sisters Buildilfi 385 June School 1958 608 K-8 5 sisters; 7 lay Building teachers School 1964 483 K-8 4 sisters/ 10 BuildinL lay teachers 223 FIGURE 13 Names and Dates of Spiritual Leaders PRIEST l SISTER NAMES FROM TO Fr. Ewhen Bartosh - Built first church 1913 1918 Rev. Fr. Hordyansky 1918 1919 Fr. Bilynsky NA NA Fr. Romaniuk NA NA Fr. Poniatyshyn NA NA Fr. Lysiak NA NA Fr. Obushkevych NA NA Fr. Dobrotvora 1921 1926 Fr. Zacerkovny 1925 1926 Rev. Kurylo 1926 1927 Rev. Pobutsky 1927 1931 Philadelphia Order of St. Basil 3 Srs teach 1928 NA night school Rev. Strutynsky 1931 1936 Fr. Chehansky (Apostleship of Prayer) 1936 1946 From 200 to 1000 families Immaculate Conception Grammar School Fr. Bilynsky 1946 1948 Fr. Schmondiuk (Bishop 1956) 1948 1956 Rev. Knapp (Day of Prayer - 2) 1956 1962 First Ukrainian Catholic Parish Becomes Coeducational High School in the U. S. monsignor and papal Chamberlain Asst. Rev. Fr. Vozniak NA NA Asst. Rev. Fr. Lubachevsky NA NA “ Rev. Fr. Kabarovsky NA NA “ Rev. Fr. Fedyk NA 1954 “ Rev. Fr. Treshnevsky NA NA Rev. Fr. Greskow NA NA “ Rev. Fr. Kruchovsky NA NA “ Rev. Fr. Paska NA 1951 “ Rev. Fr. Bobyak NA 1952 “ Rev. Fr. Blovaczky NA 1950 Apostolic See and Bishop Gabro put IC 1962 NA Parish under guidance of OSBM - Basilian Fathers Rev. Fr. Lotocky 1962 NA Asst. Fr. Gavlich 1962 NA “ “ Paschak 1962 NA “ “ Nytchka 1962 NA “ “ Vysochansky 1962 NA Br. Stelmach, OSBM 1962 NA Sr. Sosler, OSBM 1962 NA Sr. Mosiwchuk, OSBM 1962 NA Sr. Mikula, OSBM 1962 NA Sr. Kuprin, OSBM 1962 NA Sr. Lawrence, lC principal 1962 NA Sr. Leonita 1962 NA FIGURE 14 Survey Self-Report Data on English and Ukrainian Language Proficiency of Parents in the Community Mothers Fathers 75% Fluent English Speaking 69% Fluent English Speaking 81% Fluent English Reading 63% Fluent English Reading 70% Fluent English Writing 56% Fluent English Writing 50% Fluent Ukrainian Speaking 50% Fluent Ukrainian Speaking 56% Fluent Ukrainian Reading 50% Fluent Ukrainian Reading 50% Fluent Ukrainian Writing 50% Fluent Ukrainian Writing 225 FIGURE 15 Identity - formation as literate Americans Participant * Birthplace Nationality of * Highest Level ‘ Homeland of of Parents Parents of Education 1. UKRAINE UKRAINIAN COLLEGE UGRAD UKRAINE 2. USA UKRAINIAN HIGH SCHOOL UKRAINE 3. USA UKRAINIAN COLLEGE GRADUATE EUROPE 4. UKRAINE UKRAINIAN COLLEGE GRADUATE UKRAINE 5. USA UKRAINIAN COLLEGE GRADUATE UKRAINE 6. USA UKRAINIAN COLLEGE GRADUATE W UKRAINE 7. UKRAINE UKRAINIAN COLLEGE UKRAINE 8. UKRAINE UKRAINIAN - UKRAINE 9. USA OTHER HIGH SCHOOL EUROPE 10. USA UKRAINIAN HIGH SCHOOL UKRAINE 11. UKRAINE UKRAINIAN COLLEGE UGRAD UKRAINE 12. USA OTHER HIGH SCHOOL EUROPE 13. USA UKRAINIAN COLLEGE GRADUATE UKRAINE 14. OTHER UKRAINIAN SOME COLLEGE UKRAINE 15. USA UKRAINIAN HIGH SCHOOL UKRAINE 16. UKRAINE OTHER COLLEGE GRADUATE UKRAINE USA EUROPE 3 OTHER LE FIGURE 16 Places in the Ukrainian Community 1963 and 2002 Places 1963 2002 Places Churches: ICUCC Detroit Detroit ICUCC Suburb St. Josaphat Schools: ICUCES Detroit Suburb ICUCES Suburb ICUA ICUCHS Detroit Suburb ICUCHS Event Hall: Suburb Ukr. Cultural Center Business: Cymbal Steel Products Detroit Gaulin Iron Works Detroit Allen Lumber Co. Detroit Funeral Homes: Detroit Buhay Funeral Chapel Buhay Funeral Chapel Detroit Suburb Obarzanek Lefchick Funeral Home Detroit Suburb Rudy Suburb Wysocki Suburb Waski Suburb DS Temrowski & Sons Banks: Bank of Comerce Detroit Liberty State Bank Detroit Peoples State Bank Detroit Credit Union: Ukr. Selfreliance Self-Reliance Credit Un Detroit Suburb MFCU Suburb Ukr. Future Cr. Union Drug Stores: P.C. Jezewski, Drugs Detroit Suburb Ryan Pharmacy Preston’s Medicine Detroit Suburb Detroit Drugs Insurance: Roy Duzey Insurance Detroit Suburb State Farm Food and Restaurants: Steciuk's Meats Detroit Detroit Maine Street A. J. Marshall Co. Detroit Suburb Coach Light Atlas Quality Beverages Detroit Physicians: Suburb Leo Murskyj, MD Suburb Oleh Lawrin, DPM Suburb Marko Gudziak, MD Suburb Orest Sowirka, DO Suburb Barbara Kucynski, MDfi Dentists: Suburb Family Dental Care Suburb Dencap Dental Plans Furniture: Margolis Furniture Co., Inc Detroit Mich Chair Rental & Sales Detroit Fuel Oil/Gas Service Stations: John’s Friendly Service Detroit Sunoco Service Detroit Phillips Petroleum Suburb Ryco Mobilheat Fuel Oil Suburb 227 FIGURE 17 Places in the Ukrainian Community 1963 and 2002 Hair Salon: Marie’s Beauty Salon Detroit Suburb Coach-Lite Hair Stylists Building: Ukrainian Hetman Bld Corp Detroit Home Improvememt: Allen Lumber Co. Detroit Suburb All Pro Home Improvement Fortuna Cabinet Shop Detroit Greenhouse: Florian Greenhouse Detroit Hardware: Gamalski Hardware Detroit Real Estate: Suburb Remax in the Hills Suburb Century 21 Town 8. Country Detroit Century 21 Villa Detroit I Buy Houses - ICUCC Suburb member Andrew Konopada Suburb Advantage One Plumbing: Suburb Downey Plumbing Suburb All About Plumbing Roofing: Suburb Roofing Suburb Ray Reiss Roofing Co. Suburb David Edward Roofing Suburb J & J Roofing Heatigg and Cooling Suburb Absolute Comfort I Imports/Exports and Gifts: Viviano Importers, Inc. Detroit Detroit Ukrainian Gift Shop Export to USSR Detroit Suburb Knipro Travelers Trunk Co. Detroit Cosmos Parcel Express Detroit Corp. Religious Goods, Radio, Press: Krieg Bros. Religious Goods Detroit Suburb The Michigan Catholic The Ukr Cath Radio Hour Detroit Redeemer's Voice Press Suburb Photography/Photo Processing: Detroit Detroit Swifoto Swifoto Other Wings of Love Wed. Phot. Firefighters and Equipment: Det. Fire Fighters Assoc. Detroit Lakeside Fire Equipment Detroit Detroit Ukrainian Cath. Park: Suburb Kyiv Estate Autos: Detroit Al Deeby Dodg, Inc. __ Cemetery: Mt. Olivet Cemetery Detroit Detroit Mt. Olivet Cemetery Ukrainian Retirement Home: Suburb Ukrainian Village __~ Places 41 Places 50 Detroit 38 Detroit 10 Suburb 3 Suburb 40 1963 2002 Imcmm .m c.4222. 16: moaoo. 132.2... 0. 00:83 .38 12.53.. 12....qu 12....qu 13:.qu m_o2.3 032.332.. 126.2. Fm. 1.22... 02.32. .7» 02.2.2 02.22 3:20 9.2.3 9.2.53 52.9.22. mom. mcqo. 3.2.2. .7» 0:25.22 moo—:63. 12....r 1.22% an 32:30 12.5: 5.3.3.2. .22.... 1.22.. 3.8.3 5.2.6 3.... ma. 1.22.. 1.22... 0.5qu moon-m2... msonzmaa .-~ 4.6.3 .. 4.29:6 ..~ 229 52.0.5»: 1.0.. 00:00. 054.055: N00» locwm .0 02.0 00.0 003 02.0 003 02.0 003.055: >0<»:000 0.5.055: 054.055: 054.055: 002.050.: 002.055: 05.1055: m_00..<00 2000303 no... <0».0 4.20- 4:30 <00..0 450 <003 0:0 <02. 0:0 0.00000 12... <02.0 00300.0. m:n_.0: 305030.80 02:00.0. 3.0.0». 4.6.3 100.... 300.0 3»...2:0..00 5.030.. 250.8: 10.6.0: 00.0:00 :0 1.0.0... 0.500 1030:...00 m:c..0: 3.0.0: m»0.. m:..o. 0020:. r»:m..0m0 1.0.02 m<0:.0 52.0.50: 0.0.06: 1.0.0Q r0:m:0m00 0000.003. >002.:..:c 0.0.03.0 >30 230 FIGURE 20 Donations for ICUCS Building Project 2002 $2,000,000 Needed Name of Fund Date Amount Number of Donors General Donations Ongoing Loose change Container at and dollars school entrance Benefit Banquet Oct. 13, 2002 $1000 Founders NA Oct. 13, 2002 $100 Benefactors NA Oct. 13, 2002 $60 Sponsors NA The Donor Tree Ongoing $10,000 Gold NA Leaf Ongoing $5,000 Silver Leaf NA Ongoing $1.000 Bronze NA Leaf Ongoing $100,000 NA Diamond Preserve a Ongoing $250 8"x8” brick NA Memory Ongoing $125 4”x8" brick NA Adopt a Classroom Ongoing $150,000 1 Ongoing $100,000 2 Ongoing $40,000 2 Ongoing $30,000 3 Ongoing $25,000 5 Ongoing $15,000 4 Ongoing $10,935 1 Ongoing $10,000 2 Ongoing $5,000 1 is) b) FIGURE 21 Ukrainian High School Accomplishments 2002 School School Graduation Rates School Graduate‘s Activities Athletics and School Facts Accompfishmepts __ _- _ __ Oratorical Varsity 99% graduates go to a More than 1250 graduates in Contests Basketball university _th_e East-491005 _____ Ukrainian Heritage Junior Varsity 50% receive four year More than 200 doctors. Club Basketball scholarships dentists, andfleattflgaie Profesaenats National Honor Women's 85% receive philanthropic More than 200 attorneys Society Basketball scholarships ___p_ __p________ _ _ __ .- __A p _ Chorus Baseball Teacher/Student ratio is More than 200 engineers 1:5 Yearbook Softball Affordable Tuition More than 100 business and admtnistra.“te_,9ro,tes_sioria*§-_- _ . Newspaper Jr. Varsity Women‘s Three families previously More than 75 educators Volleyball home schooled _ Computer Soccer Enrollment 90-100 Two college professors Club Debate Men’s Soccer CHSL 1936 ICUC Grade School Three principals — one elem. f Club Champions 1994 founded one middle school, one high school _ _ Foreign Exc. Volleyball District 1959 ICUCHS founded Two US. diplomats Club Champion51995,1996 h______ _ _ Lectors Women's Basketball 1963 first HS graduating Seven journalists and authors CHSL Champs class 1995-6 _ SADD Women's Basketball Principal of HS graduated Six in the entertainment District Champs 1996 1963 ind_u§try_______‘ _ _ _ _. Ski Club Immaculate Conception Five criminologists Schools faculty - 8 alumni Phi Beta Kappa IMUCS Westbrook Campus has 13.5 acres Two builders Student Council 1999 High School moves to Westbrook campus Two priests, one 006360" V Sister of the Basflan Order ____-, Audio Tech Club Outstanding Am. H. S. in One archaeologist US News and World Report January, 1999 Departmental 2002 ICUCS building One boxer Assistants project begins One forest ranger One fireman One international rock star One television‘broadcast journalist [\J '0) Id 1 l i REFERENCES Adams, M. J. (1990). Beginning to read: Thinking and learning about print. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Adams, M. , & Bertram, B. (1980). Background knowledge and reading comprehension. Reading Education Report No. 13. Urbana, IL: Center for the Study of Reading, University of Illinois. Adorno, Theodore. (1991). The Culture Industry: Selected Essays on Mass Culture. London: Routledge. Antin, Mary. (2001), The Promised Land. New York: Random House, Inc. The Apostolic Tradition of Hippolitus, translated by F. S. Easton, 1962. Attwater, Donald. (1948). The Christian Churches of the East, 2 vols. Duckett, London, Bruce, Milwaukee. Bach, Robert L. (1986). “Immigration: Issues of Ethnicity, Class and Public Policy in the United States.” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science. 485: 139—152. Bachynsky, Yuliian. (1914). Ukrainian emigration. Vol. 1, Ukrainian immigration in the United States of America. Lviv, Ukraine: Balytsky and Harasevych. Barkan, Elliott (1996). And Still They Come: Immigrants and American Society 1920- 1990s Wheeling, Illinois: Harlan Davidson, Inc. Barth, F. ed. (1969). Ethnic groups and boundaries: The social organization of culture difference. Boston: Little, Brown, and Company. Barton, David. (1994). Literacy: An Introduction to the Ecology of Written Language. Basilian Fathers. (1963). Golden Jubilee Souvenir Immaculate Conception Ukrainian Catholic Church Yearbook: 1913-1963. Baugh, J. 6., Jr. (1979). Linguistic Style-shifting in Black English. PhD Dissertation, University of Pennsylvania. Bauman, Z. (1973). Culture as praxis. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul. Benz, Ernst. (1963). The Eastern Orthodox Church: lts Thought and Life. Garden City, NY. 233 Bogdan, Robert C., and Sari Knopp Biklen. (1992). Foundations of Qualitative Research in Education: An Introduction. In Qualitative Research for Education: An Introduction to Theory and Methods. Second Edition. Boston: Allyn and Bacon. Bozyk, Msgr. V. (1988). Ukraine: 1000 Years of Christianity.(2"d Edition). Winnipeg: Buchanan Printers. Bruner, Jerome. (1996). The Culture of Education. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Bruner, J, and D. Olson. (1977-78). Symbols and texts as the tools of intellect. Interchange 8 (4): 1-15. Bulgakov, Sergius. (1935). The Orthodox Church. Dobbs Ferry, NY. Burns, Paul, et al. (2002) Teaching Reading in Today’s Elementary Schools. New York: Houghton Mifflin. Bushnell, Mary. (2001). Cultural Assumptions and Community in an ElementarySchool. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, Vol. 32, No. 2, June 2001. Charnofsky, S. (1971). Educating the Poweriess. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing Co. Chew, Allen F. (rev. ed., 1970). An Atlas of Russian History: Eleven Centuries of Changing Borders. Chirovsky, Nicholas. (1981, 1984, 1986). An Introduction to Ukrainian History. 3 vols. New York: Philosophical Library. Clark, M. M. (1976). Young fluent readers. London: Heinemann. Clay, M. M. (1967). The reading behavior of five-year-old children: A research report. New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies, 2 Clifford, J., and Marcus,G. (Eds). (1986). Writing culture: The poetics and politics of ethnography. Berkeley: University of California Press. Cole, Michael. (1996). Cultural Psychology: a once and future discipline. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press. Cole, Michael. (1985). The zone of proximal development: Where culture and cognition create each other. In Culture, communication, and cognition: Vygotskian perspectives, Ed. J. V. Wertsch. New York: Cambridge University Press. Cole, M, and S Scribner. (1974). Culture and thought: A psychological introduction. New York: Wiley. Coles, Robert. (1989). The Call of Stories: Teaching and the Moral Imagination. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company. Collins, Th. P. (1967). The Risen Christ in the Fathers of the Church. Glen Rock, NJ. Cook-Gumperz, J. (1977). Situated Instructions: Language socialization of school- age children. In Child Discourse. S. Ervin-Tripp and C. Mitchell- Kernan (eds). New York: Academic Press. Cooper, J. David. (2002). Literacy: Helping Children Construct Meaning. New York: Houghton Mifflin Company. Cymbalisty, Bohdan U. (1987). Growing Up in Two Cultures. Jersey City, NJ: Ukrainian National Association. Dacko, Msgr. lwan. (1991). “Status of the Ukrainian Greek-Catholic Church in Ukraine.” The Sower, 27 Januray, 1, 4,14. Dalmais, I. H. (1963). The Eastern Liturgies. Published in The Twentieth Century Encyclopedia of Catholicism (no. 112), Hawthorn, New York. Daniels, Roger. (1990). Coming to America: A History of Immigration and Ethnicity in American Life. New York: Harper Perennial. DeLaet, Debra L. (2000). U. S. Immigration Policy in an Age of Rights. Westport, CT: Praeger. Dinnerstein, L, and Reimers, D. (1975). Ethnic Americans: A History of Immigration and Assimilation. New York: Dodd, Mead & Company. Englert, Clement. (1961). Catholics and Orthodox: Can They Unite? New York: Paulist. Erickson, Frederick. (1975). Gatekeeping and the Melting Pot: Interaction in counseling encounters. Harvard Educational Review 45(1): 44-70. 235 Erickson, Frederick and Schultz, Jeffrey. (1981). When Is a Context? Some Issues and Methods in the Analysis of Social Competence. In Ethnography and Language in Educational Settings. Judith L. Green and Cynthia Wallat, eds. Norvvood, NJ; ABLEX Publishing Company. Erickson, Frederick. (1985). “Qualitative Methods in Research on Teaching”. Pp. 119-161 in Wittrock, Merlin C. (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Teaching, 3'd Ed. New York: Macmillan. Erikson, E. H. (1950). Childhood and Society. London: Imago. . (1959). Identity and the Life Cycle. New York: International University Press. . (Ed.). (1963). Youth, Change, and Challenge. Fawcett, T. (1971). The Symbolic Language of Religion! Minneapolic, MN: Augsburg Publishing House. Fedoriw, Rev. George. (1983). History of the Church in Ukraine. Trans. Petro Krawchuk. Toronto: Saint Sophia Religious Association of Ukrainian Catholics in Canada. Fedotov, G. P. (1946). The Russian Religious Mind: Kievan Christianity Finn, Edward E. (SJ.) (1961). A Brief History of the Eastem Rites. Collegeville, Minn: The Liturgical Press. Florio-Ruane, Susan. (2001). Teacher Education and the Cultural Imagination: Autobiography, Conversation, and Narrative. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers. Foner, Nancy. (2000). From Ellis Island to JFK: New York’s Two Great Waves of Immigration. New York: Yale University Press. Freund, Gerald. (1957). Unholy Alliance: Russian-German relations from the Treaty of Brest-Litovsk to the Treaty of Beriin. London. Gachev, G. D. (1987). “Ethnic representations of the world," Literary issues, No. 10 pp. 158-173. Geertz, Clifford. (1963). Agricultural Involution: The Process of Ecological Change in Indonesia. Berkeley: University of California Press. 236 Geertz, Clifford. (1965). “The Impact of the Concept of Culture on the Concept of Man” in John R. Platt, (Ed) New Views of Man. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. . (1968). “Religion: Anthropological Study” International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences, Vol. 13. New York: Macmillan. . (1973 [1993]). The Interpretation of Cultures. New York: Basic Books. . (1983). Local Knowledge: Further essays in interpretive anthropology. New York: Basic Books. . (1989). Works and Lives. .' The Anthropologist as Author. Oxford: Polity Press. Geertz, Clifford. (1995). After the Fact: Two Countries, Four Decades, One Anthropologist. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press. Gibson, Margaret. (1988). Accommodation without assimilation: Sikh immigrants in an American high school. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. . (1991). Minorities and schooling: Some implications. In M. Gibson & J. Ogbu (Eds), Minority status and schooling: A comparative study of immigrant and involuntary minorities. NY: Garland Publishing. . (1991). Ethnicity, gender and social class: The school adaptation patterns of West Indian youths. In Gibson, M. & Ogbu, J. (Eds), Minority status and schooling: A comparative study of immigrant and involuntary minorities. . (1997). Complicating the immigrant/involuntary minority typology. Anthropology and Education Quarterly (28)3, pp. 431—454. Giddens, A. (1979). Central problems in social theory. Action, structure, and contradiction in social analysis. Berkeley: University of California Press. Gilbert, Martin. (1993) Atlas of Russian History. (Second Edition). NY: Oxford University Press. Gillborn, D. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. New York: Doubleday Press. Glaser, B. G., and Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. Chicago: Aldine. Glaser, B. G., and Strauss, A. L . (1965). Awareness of dying. ChicagozAIdine. Glazer, Nathan. (1954). “Ethnic Groups in America.” In Freedom and Control in Modern Society, ed. Monroe Berger, Theodore Abel, and Charles Page, New York: Van Nostrand. Glazer, Nathan, and Daniel Patrick Moynihan. (1963). Beyond the Melting Pot. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Glazier, Jocelyn, VcVee, Mary, Wallace-Cowell Susan, Shellhorn, Bette, Florio- Ruane, Susan and Raphael, Taffy. (2000). Teaching Learning in Response to Autobiographical Literature. In Reader Response in Secondary and College Classrooms. Nicholas J. Karolides, Ed. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers. Gogol, N. V. (1960). The Divine Liturgy of the Eastern Orthodox Church. London: Darton, Longman & Todd. Goodenough, Ward H. (1981). Problems in the Conception of Culture. In Culture, Lanugage, and Society. Second Edition. Menlo Park, CA: Benjamin/Cummings Publishing Company. (1981). The Content of Culture. In Culture. Language, and Society. Second Edition. Menlo Park, CA: Benjamin/Cummings Publishing Company. . (1970). Description and comparison in cultural anthropology. Chicago: Aldine. . (1956). “Residence Rules” Southwestern Journal of Anthropology, 12:22-37. Goody, E. (ed). (1982). From craft to industry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (1989). Learning and the division of labor, in M. Coy (ed), Anthropological perspectives on apprenticeship. New York: SUNY Press. Goody, J. (1977). The Domestication of the Savage Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. . (1987). The Interface Between the Written and the Oral. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Gordon, Milton. (1964). Assimilation in American Life: The Role of Race, Religion, and National Origins. New York: Oxford University Press. 238 Goscilo, H., and Holmgren, B. (Eds). (1996). Russia - Women — Culture. Indiana University Press. Goulart, Ron. (1986). Great History of Comic Books. Chicago: Contemporary Books. Greenfield, P. (1984). A theory of the teacher in the learning activities of everyday life, in B. Rogoff and J. Lave (eds), Everyday cognition: Its development in social context. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Gulovich, S (1947). Windows Westward: Rome, Russia, Reunion. New York: Declan & McMuIIen. Halecki, Oscar. (1968). From Florence to Brest, 1439-1596, 2"d ed. New York. Halich, Wasyl. (1951). Ukrainians in the United States. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Hammersley, M. & Atkinson, P. (1996). Ethnography: Principles in practice, second edition. London: Routledge. Harding, Sandra. (1987). What is feminist epistemology? Pp. 105-137 in Whose Science? Whose Knowledge? Thinking from Women ’3 Lives. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. Harre‘, R. (1984). Social sources of mental content and order. IN J. Margolis, P. T. Manicas, R. Harre‘, & P.F. Secord (Eds), Psychology: Designing the discipline (pp. 91-127). Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell. Haviland, William A. (1996). Culture/Anthropology. Eighth Edition. Orlando, Florida: Harcourt Brace and Co. (1997). Anthropology. Eighth Edition. Orlando, Florida: Harcourt Brace and Co. Hedegaard, M. (1988). The zone of proximal development as a basis for instruction. Aarhus, Denmark: Institute of Psychology. Heyman, Neil M. (1993). Russian History. NY: McGraw-Hill, Inc. Hoffman, Eva. (1989). Lost in translation: A life in a new language. New York: Penguin Books. 239 Horniatkevych, D. and L. Nenadkevych, “Embroidery,” in Encyclopedia of Ukraine 12816-18; Lydia Nenadkewich, “Embroidery," in Ukrainian Arts, 51-9. Jacob, Evelyn. (1988). Clarifying Qualitative Research: A Focus on Traditions. Educational Researcher 17 (1): 15-24. Kardash, Peter. (1988). Ukraine and Ukrainians. Ed. Brett Lockwood. Melbourne, Australia: Fortuna Company. Kmit, Anne, Loretta Luciow, Johanna Luciow, and Luba Perchyshyn. (1979). Ukrainian Easter Eggs and How We Make Them. Minneapolis: Harrison, Smith-Lund Press. Kottak, Conrad Phillip. (1997). Anthropology: The Exploration of Human Diversity. ” New York: McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Krawczeniuk, Osyp. (1984). The Ukrainian Church In America: Its Beginnings. Detroit: The Ukrainian Millennium Committee of Detroit. Krieger, Susan. (1991). “The presence of the self.” Pp. 43-48 in Social Science and the Self: Personal Essays on an Art Form. New Brunswick, NY: Rutgers University. Kroeber, A. L., and Kluckhohn, Clyde. (1952). Culture: A Critical Review of Concepts and Definitions. New York: Vintage. Kubijovyc, Volodymyr. (1937). Atlas of Ukraine and Adjoining Countries. Lvov. Kubijovyc, Volodymyr, Ed. (1963, 1971). Ukraine: A Concise Encyclopedia. 2 vols. Toronto: University of Toronto Press. . Ed. (1984, 1988). Encyclopedia of Ukraine: A Concise Encyclopedia. 2 vols. Toronto: University of Toronto Press. Kucharek, Casimir. (1971 ). The Byzantine-Slav Liturgy of St. John Chrysostom, its origin and evolution. AIIendale, N.J.: Alleluia Press. Lave, Jean and Wenger, Etienne. (1991) Situated Leaming: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. LeCompte, M. D., & Preissle J. P., wit Tesch, R. (1993). Ethnography and qualitative design in educational research (2"d ed). San Diego, CA: Academic Press. LeCompte, Margaret, and Schensul, Jean. (1999). Designing and Conducting Ethnographic Research ? (1999). How Does a Community of Learners Maintain Itself? Ecology of an Innovative School. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 30(2).161- 186 Le Guillou, M. J. OR, (1964). The Spirit of Eastern Orthodoxy. Glen Rock, N.Y.: Deus/Century (Paulist). Lobanov-Rostovsky, Andrei. (1947). Russia and Emma 1789-1825. Toronto: McGraw-Hill, Inc. Luciow, Johanna, Ann Kmit, and Loretta Luciow. (1975). Eggs Beautiful — How to Make Ukrainian Easter Eggs. Minneapolis, MN: Harrison, Smith-Lund Press for the Ukrainian Gift Shop. Lukowski, Jerzy, and Zawadzki, Hubert. (2001). A Concise History of Poland. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Luzney, R. (1963). Liturgy of the Byzantine-Ukrainian Rite. Yorkton, Sask: Redeemer’s Voice. Madey, J. (1984). “Churches of Ukraine, Structures," in Encyclopedia of Ukraine 1:489. Magocsi, Paul R. (1996). A History of Ukraine. Toronto: University of Washington Press. Magosci, Paul Robert, and Geoffrey J. Matthews. (1985). Ukraine: A Historical Atlas. Toronto: University of Toronto Press. Manning, Clarence A. (1951). Twentieth-Century Ukraine. New York. Marcus, Morton. (1988). Pages from a scrapbook of immigrants: a journey in poems. Minneapolis: Coffee House Press. Marschall, Richard. (1989). America’s Great Comic Strip Artists. New York: Abbeville Press. Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, self, and society form the standpoint of a social behaviorist. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Merriman, S. B. (1988P. Case study research in education: A qualitative approach. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. 24] Mirtchiuk, I. (1924). Worid theory of the Ukrainian people, (an effort to define it). Prague. . Ed. (1949). Ukraine and Its People: A Handbook with Maps, Statistical Tables and Diagrams. Munich: Ukrainian Free University Press. Mitchell, Candace. (2001). “Multiculturalism and Bilingual Education.” Educational Researcher, Vol. 30, No. 5, June/July 2001. Mitz, Anne, Ed. (1955). Ukrainian Arts. Rev. ed. New York: Ukrainian Youth’s League of North America. Moll, L. C. (1992). Bilingual classroom studies and community analysis: some recent trends. Educational researcher 21 (2)220-24. Moll, L. C., Amanti, C., Neff, N. and Gonzales N. (1992). Funds of knowledge for teaching: Using a qualitative approach to connect homes to schools. Theory into practice 31 (2):132-141. Moll, L. C. and Conzalez, N. (1994). Lessons from research with language- minority children. Joumal of reading behavior 26(4):439-456. Nye, Russel B. (1900-1998). Children and comics: clipping file. Collected at Michigan State University in the Russel B. Nye Popular Culture Collection Popular Culture Vertical File. Obolensky, Dimitri. (1971). Byzantium and the Slavs: Collected Studies. Onyshkevych, Larissa, M. L. Zaleska. (1988). “Basic elements of a Ukrainian wedding.” Our Life. 8 September: 18-24. Pawliczko, Ann Lencyk. (1994). Ukraine and Ukrainians throughout the World. Toronto: University of Toronto Press. Payne, Michael (Ed). (1997). A Dictionary of Cultural and Critical Theory. Malden, Massachusetts: Blackwell Publishers, Inc. Perry, George. (and AIda Aldridge), (1971). The Penguin Book of Comics: A Slight History. London. Picknicki-Morski, Jeff. (1988). “Summer Cycle of Rites and Customs Highlights Ukrainian Folk Tradition." Ukrainian Weekly. 4 September, 10. 242 Portes, A. (1995). “Children of Immigrants: Segmented Assimilation and Its Determinants.” In The Economic Sociology of Immigration: Essays on Networks, Ethnicity, and Entrepreneurship, ed. Alejandro Portes. New York: Russell Sage Foundation. . (1987). “Immigration Reform: The Theory and the Realities.” Baltimore Sun, January 2, 1987, 15A. . (1984). “The Rise of Ethnicity.” American Sociological Review 49 (June 1984): 383-397. Portes, Alejandro. (1995).”Children of Immigrants: Segmented Assimilation and Its Determinants.” In Alejandro Portes (ed), The Economic Sociology of Immigration. New York: Russell Sage Foundation. (1996). “Global Villagers: The Rise of Transnational Communities.” The American Prospect. (March-April)” 74-78. (1997). “Immigration Theory for a New Century: Some Problems and Opportunities.” Intemational Migration Review 31: 799- 825. Portes, Alejandro, and Lingxin Hao. (1997). “English First or English Only? Bilingualism and Parental Language Loss in the Second Generation.” Paper presented at the conference The Second Generation, The Jerome Levy Economics Institute, Bard College. Portes, A, and Rumbaut, R. (1996). Immigrant America: A Portrait. Berkeley: University of California. Portes, Alejandro, and Richard Schauffler. (1994). “Language and the Second Generation: Bilingualism Yesterday and Today.” International Migration Review 28: 640-61. Portes, Alejandro, and Julia Sensenbrenner. (1993). “Embeddedness and Immigration: Notes on the Social Determinants of Economic Action.” American Journal of Sociology 98: 1320-50. Portes, Alejandro, and Min Zhou. (1993). “The New Second Generation: Segmented Assimilation and Its Variants among Post-1965 Immigrant Youth.” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 530: 74-98. Pritsak, Omeljan. (1981). The Origin of Rus’. Vol. 1. Cambridge, Mass. Ravenstein, E. G. (1889). “The Laws of Migration.” Joumal of the Royal Statistical Society. Robbins, R. H. (1990). A short history of linguistics. London: Hutchinson. Rogoff, Barbara, and Jean Lave, (Eds). (1984). Everyday cognition: Its development in social contexts. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press. Rogoff, Barbara, and J. V. Wertsch, (Eds) (1984). Children’s learning in the “zone of proximal development.” In New directions for child deveIOpment, no. 23. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Rudnyckyj. J. B. (1963). “The Position of the Ukrainian Language among the Slavic Languages,” in Ukraine: A Concise Encyclopedia, vol. 1, ed. Volodymyr Kubijovyc. Toronto: University of Toronto Press. Rumbaut, Ruben G. (1994). “The Crucible Within: Ethnic Identity, Self-Esteem, and Segmented Assimilation Among Children of Immigrants.” International Migration Review 28 (Winter 1994): 748-794. Sadoul, Georges. (1976). Panorama de la bande dessinee. Paris: Editions J’ai lu. Scribner, S. and M. Cole. (1981). The psychology of literacy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Scribner, Sylvia. 1984). Literacy in three metaphors. American Joumal of Education 93 (1): 6-21. . (1977). Modes of thinking and ways of speaking. In Thinking: Readings in cognitive science, (Ed) P. N. Johnson-Laird and P. C. Wason. New York: Cambridge University Press. . (1985). Vygotsky’s use of history. In Culture, communication, and cognition: Vygotskian perspectives, (Ed) J. V. Wertsch. New York: Cambridge University Press. Senyshyn, Ambrose. (1954 ). We Magnify Thee: Collection of Prayer Services. (Ukrainian and English). Stamford, Conn: Archbishop of Beroe. Serpell, R. (1990). Audience, culture, and psychological explanation. A reformulation of the emic-etic problem in cross-cultural psychology. Quarteriy Newsletter of the Laboratory of Comparative Human Cognition. 12, 99-132. 244 Sevcenko, Ihor. (1984). “Byzantium and the Slavs,” Harvard Ukrainian Studies, VIII, "/4. Cambridge, Mass. Shellhorn, Bette J. (1998) Exploring Comics: Viewing Texts, Images, and Gender. Manuscript. Michigan State University. Shereghy, Basil. (1968). The Liturgical Year of the Byzantine-Slavonic Rite. Shevelov, G. (1984). “Church Slavonic,” in Encyclopedia of Ukraine 1: 488-9. . (1963). “History of the Ukrainian Language." In Ukraine: A Concise Encyclopedia, vol. 1. Toronto: University of Toronto Press. Sichynsky, V. “Weaving,” in Ukraine: A Concise Encyclopedia 1: 389-90, and D. Horniatkevych, Kylym- Making,” in ibid., 1: 390-4; Damian Horniatkewych, “Kilim,” in Ukrainian Arts, 83-91. Singer, Eliot. (1993). Anthropological Definitions of and Statements about Culture. Manuscript. Sokhocky, Isidore. (1959). “The Ukrainian Catholic Church of the Byzantine Rite” in The Ukrainian Catholic Metropolia in the USA. Philadelphia. Solovey, Meletius. (1970). The Byzantine Divine Liturgy: History and Commentary. Washington, D. C.: The Catholic University of America Press, Inc. Spradley, James. (1979). The ethnographic interview. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston. Subtelny, Orest. (1981). The Mazepists: Ukrainian Separatism in the EartyEighteenth Century. New York: Columbia University Press. (1988). Ukraine: A History. Toronto: University of Toronto Press. . (1991 ). Ukrainians in North America: An Illustrated History. Toronto: University of Toronto Sysyn, Frank E. (1990). “The Formation of Modern Ukrainian Religious Culture: The 16th and 17‘ Centuries,” in Geoffrey A. Hosking, (Ed), Church, Nation, and State in Russia and Ukraine. Edmonton. Taylor, C. (1996). Sources of the self: The making of modern identity. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Is.) 4:. U1 Thaden, Edward C. (Ed). (1981). Russification in the Baltic Provinces and Finland, 1855-1914. Tylor, Edward Burnett. (1871) In Culture: A Critical Review of Concepts and Definitions by Kroeber and Kluckhohn (1952). New York: Vintage. . (1874/1958). Primitive Culture. Vol. 1. Rpt. London: g Murray, 1929. Ukrainian Information Collective. (1985). Geography of Ukraine. N. p., Australia: Ukrainian Information Collectives Vaticanum II. (1963). Constitution on the Sacred Liturgy. Vygotsky, L. S. (1929). The problem of cultural development of the child. Journal of genetic psychology. 35: 415 — 434. . (1934a). Thinking and speech: Psychological investigations. Moscow and Leningrad: Gosudarstvennoe Sotsial’no-Ekonomicheskoe Izdatel’stvo. . (1960). The development of higher mental functions. Moscow: Izdat’stvo Akademii Pedagogicheskikh Nauk. . (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. (Ed) Michael Cole, Vera John-Steiner, Sylvia Scribner, and Ellen Souberrnan. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press. Webster’s New World Dictionary. (1997). College Edition. Wenger, E. (1990). Toward a theory of cultural transparency: elements of a social discourse of the visible and the invisible. Palo Alto, CA: Institute for Research and Learning. Wertsch, J. V. (ed) (1985a). Culture, communication, and cognition: Vygotskian prospectives. New York: Cambridge University Press. . (1985c). Vygotsky and the social formation of mind. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press. . (19793). From social interaction to higher psychological processes: A clarification and application of Vygotsky’s theory. Human development. 22 (1): 1-22. Wertsch, J. V., and C. A. Stone. (1985). The concept of internalization in Vygotsky’s account of the genesis of higher mental functions. In Culture, communication, and cognition, (Ed) J. V. Wertsch, 162-179. New York: Cambridge University Press. White, Leslie. (1940). “The Symbol: The Origin and Basis of Human Behavior,” Philosophy of Science, 7:451 -463. . (1949). The Science of Culture: A Study of Man and Civilization. New York: Farrar, Strauss. . (1959). The Evolution of Culture: The Development of Civilization to the Fall of Rome. New York: McGraw-Hill. Whyte, William Foote. (1973, 1955, 1943). Street Corner Society: The Social Structure of an Italian Slum. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. Williams, George H. (1978). “Protestants in the Ukraine during the Period of the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth,” HUS, II, 1 and 2. Wolowyna, Oleh, Ed. (1986). Ethnicity and National Identity: Demographic and Socioeconomic Characteristics of Persons with Ukrainian Mother Tongue. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Wyman, Mark. (1993). Round-Trip America: The Immigrants Return to Europe 1880-1930. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. Zinchenko, V. P. (1985). Vygotsky’s ideas about units for the analysis of mind. In Culture, communication, and cognition: Vygotskian perspectives, (Ed) J. V. Wertsch. New York: Cambridge University Press. Zinkewych, Osyp, and Andrew Sorokowski, Eds. (1988). A Thousand Years of Christianity in Ukraine. New York: Smoloskyp Publishers. 247 iiiiiiititiiiiiiitiirii.iiiii