‘1 ‘7 ‘ - '.'. I l v :; Z 7 , ‘ 3&- V ”a "(3233" k, V ' ‘ h - -. ,..-\v j . ,. . _ . u > . ..--:'!‘ r. cl, ‘ ,. h» -‘i‘_‘ . . ’; \. ', " . 1 . _ L- ; 3",. "HAN-4 r . .. .3 ~- .L :a‘fi: .sng mm wail ' - - ' - = ecu-- .; pr» . I . H .. . . ‘ ‘ w‘, -. [4.1.x . ‘..|‘,,. ,_ ,. -¢—A .. .- * -.~ v [.11 a v urp‘ -, . . ‘ iv. ...n l v 7:, ‘ T7“) -. I. .‘ ‘4 ’1, 3r , . 3?" $2459» :3' * l 5H m ‘ I ‘ ‘ ‘ ' ‘ . . ‘m H» 55:43:»: h 7 "I , ' . ' ' . .‘ . : 3 I! ‘ any? *‘?‘{5‘ . ‘ , ‘. . \ . _ ’ . - % 3:33” : ‘ ~ ‘ V 1 < q .‘4 z': ‘ ,‘k:!ts.v H.~ ”-3 a ’“’%fi§:?‘,’u‘.z-3‘" ' MIN ’= . *5. . ; ‘ -- . . I ' - g :1 “gay“; 1 H. V 7 I. A " r ' jg flfi‘finfifi "x ’IM'EL ul- i‘k -.. 'r‘ 35' ' Wain ‘ -, I ‘;‘-Dw 0 - . '-;v V . " ‘gq " ~ I ' n~ ‘.~ 3.4 as? I PLACE IN RETURN BOX to remove this checkout from your record. TO AVOID FINES return on or before date due. MAY BE RECALLED with earlier due date if requested. DATE DUE DATE DUE DATE DUE 5I08 KzlProleoc8PresICIRCIDateDue.indd ABSTRACT FACTORS INFLUENCING COMPETITION OF ANNUAL BLUEGRASS (POA ANNUA L.) WITHIN ESTABLISHED TURFCRASS COMMUNITIES AND SEEDLING STANDS By James E. Bogart Phenological observations and controlled climate growth chamber studies were used to investigate the growth responses of annual bluegrass (Poa annua L.), Merion Kentucky bluegrass (Poa pratensis L.), and Penncross creeping bentgrass (Agrostis palustris Huds.). Measurements of root and shoot dry weights were made at each of seven constant temperature treatments. Annual bluegrass seedhead production and seed germination were also observed. The phenological observations, when combined with the temperature findings, indicate that Penncross creeping bent- grass and Merion Kentucky bluegrass began spring growth prior to annual bluegrass. Penncross creeping bentgrass and Merion Kentucky bluegrass initiated new shoot growth between 50° and 55°F, while established plants of annual bluegrass did not initiate new Spring growth until the soil temperature exceeded 55°F. Penncross creeping bentgrass produced maximum root dry weight at 60°F while Merion Kentucky bluegrass and annual bluegrass produced maximum root dry weights at 70°F. Annual bluegrass root growth was significantly higher than Merion Kentucky bluegrass and Penncross creeping bentgrass at temper- atures from 50° to 80°F. All three species produced maximum shoot dry weights at 60°F. Penncross creeping bentgrass was adapted to a wider range of temperatures having produced superior root and shoot dry weights at the extreme tempera- tures of #00 and 90°F. Maturity of the three species was attained quicker at 80°F. The root systems of all three species had begun to turn brown at 80°F. Annual bluegrass plants at 80°F produced seedheads during the first 15 days of the constant temperature treatment. However, seedheads at 60°, 70°, and 90°F were not produced until after day 15. Annual bluegrass seed germination did not differ signifi- cantly at constant temperatures from 40° to 70°F. Hewever, very substantial decreases were observed at 800 and 90°F. A second phase of the investigation involved a study of the competitive ability of annual bluegrass as influenced by cutting height. Annual bluegrass plants were grown in estab- lished Merion Kentucky bluegrass sod and in monostands. Measurements were made of shoot dry weight, root organic matter, tiller number, and shoot density of the annual bluegrass. Cutting height treatments significantly influenced the shoot dry weight, tiller number, and shoot density. The 1.0 inch cutting height ranked highest in shoot dry weight and tiller number production. It was concluded that the optimum cutting height for annual bluegrass is 1.0 inch. The final competitive factor investigated was root growth and deveIOpment. Annual bluegrass, Penncross creeping bentgrass, and Nerion Kentucky bluegrass were compared using special root observation boxes with slanting glass faces. Root growth and deve10pment was observed over 15-day and 50- day periods where one set of plants remained uncut while the other set was clipped three times weekly at 1.0 inch. The rooting depth among the three species was non- significant at the end of both growing periods. Root organic matter produced during the 30-day period was also non-significant among Species. However, visual observations during the initial 10 day period indicated that annual blue- grass root growth was more rapid. The root organic matter production after 15 days supported this observation. Cutting the plants at 1.0 inch reduced the rooting depth of all three species. Penncross creeping bentgrass was the most severely reduced. These findings showed that annual bluegrass is not shallow rooted as is commonly believed. Furthermore, the initial superiority in rooting capability of annual bluegrass could play an important role in its competition within a turfgrass community. FACTORS INFLUENCING COMPETITION OF ANNUAL BLUEGRASS (POA ANNUA L.) WITHIN ESTABLISHED TURFGRASS COMMUNITIES AND SEEDLING STANDS BY {\ James E? BOgart A THESIS Submitted to Michigan State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE Department of CrOp and Soil Sciences 1972 6‘ ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The author would like to express his sincere apprecia- tion to the following persons without whose help and guidance this study would not have been possible: The United States Golf Association Greens Section through whose grant this investigation was partially supported. My loving wife JOan who aided in the preparation of this manuscript and without whose inspiration and encouragement this investigation may have never been completed. Dr. W. F. Meggitt and J. M. vargas Jr. for their assist- ance and suggestions as members of the author's guidance committee. Dr. P. E. Rieke for his constructive criticism during the preparation of this manuscript and for serving on the guidance committee. And finally, Dr. J. B. Beard; major professor, teacher, and above all friend; whose inSpiration and guidance, through- out the course of study and this investigation, were greatly appreciated. TABLE OF CONTENTS IN‘mODUCTIONOOOOOOOOOOOO00....00......00.0.000000000000000001 1.1mm REVIE1JOO00......OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOCOOOO000.......03 General macription.OI.OOOOOOOOOOOOOO0.00.00.00.00...0.3 RootinSOOOOOOO0....O0.0...00......OOOOOOOIOOOOOOOOOOOOO Seed Germination and Dissemination.....................9 ECOtype variability. . O C C C O C O O C O O C O C O O O C O C . C C O C O . O O O O O O 12 Adaptation. 0.. O O O C C C O O O C . O O . C C C O C C O O . O C C O C O O O O O O O O O O O O .14 Temperature-Growth Relationships......................l6 cutting might. C O O O O O C . C C C O O . C O C O . O . O C O C O C C C O O C C O C O O C .20 Fertility Response 0 O O C O . O C O C C O C O C C O O O O O C C O O C O O C O C C O O O .21 MAMMIB Am mmomOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO0000.00.00.000000000025 TEMPERATURE-GROW}! REIATIONSI-HPSOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO00.000.000.025 Phen01081cal ObservatIODSOOOOOOOOOOOO0.0.0.0000...0.0025 Controlled Climate Growth Chamber Studies.............30 NITROGEN FERTILITY AND CUTTING HEIGHT STUDIES..............34 Matm 80d merimentOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO0.000.000.0000031" Annual Bluegrass Menostand Experiment.................36 ROOT GROW AND DMI—DPMNT STIIDIESOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO0.0.0.0003? RESULTS Am DISCUSSION.OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO00.00000000000000041 WWW-GROW REMTIONSI-HPSOOOO0.00.0.000000000000000041 PhenOIOgical ObservationSOOIOOOO00.000000000000000000041 Controlled Climate Growth Chamber Studies.............43 CUTTING HEIGHT AND NITROGEN FERTILITY STUDIES..............52 Mature 30d mwrmntc.0000..0000.00.00.0000.000.000.052 Annual Bluegrass Monostand............................55 ROOT GROW Am DmmPMNTOOOOOOOOO0.000.000.000000000000056 CONcmSIONSOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO.00.000...00.00.000.000...00.0.0062 BIBlImRAPI'IYOOOOOOOOOO0000.00.00.00.000.00.000...000000000064 APPENDIXOOOOOOOO0.0......O...O...O0.00...0.0.00.0000000000067 TABLE 1. TABLE 2. TABLE 3. TABLE 4. TABLE 5. TABLE 6. TABLE,7. TABLE 8. TABLE 9. LIST OF TABLES Approximate root depths of cool and warm season turfgrasses................................7 Clipping yields of two turfgrass species to six constant temperature treatments...........50 Annual bluegrass seed germination as influenced by six temperature treatments.........52 The influence of five cutting heights on the shoot dry weights of individual annual blue- grass plants grown in a mature Merion Kentucky blmgass SOdOO0.000000000000000000000000.0.0.0005} The influence of five cutting heights on the tillering of individual annual bluegrass plants grown in a mature Merion Kentucky bl‘legrass SOdOOOOOOOOOOOOOOIOIOOOOOOOOIOOOOOO000.54 The influence of five cutting heights on the shoot density of annual bluegrass plants grown in a nomostand......................55 The rooting depths of three turfgrass Species grown under two cutting treatments for 30 days after transplanting..................57 The rooting depths of three turfgrass species grown under two cutting heights for 15 days after transplanting..................59 The root organic matter produced by three turfgrass species when grown under two cutting treatments for 15 days after trans- planting.OOOOOOOOOOOOOOO0.00000000000000000000.0060 Figure 1. Figure 2. Figure 3. Figure 4. Figure 5. LIST OF FIGURES Individual plants growing in sand cultures that were used in controlled Climate growth ChWber StudyOOOOOOOOOOO0.00.000.00.00000000000032 Root observation box with slanting glass face used for observation of root growth and develomntooOOOOOOOOOOOOO0.0.0.00.0...00.0.38 Shoot growth responses of three turfgrass species to seven constant temperature tmamntSOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO0.0000u6 Root growth responses of three turfgrass species to seven constant temperature treatmnts...‘OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO0.00.00.000.00..0048 Rooting of three turfgrass species 15 days af‘ter transplantingooOOOOOOOIOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO000.61 INTRODUCTION Annual bluegrass (Poa annua L.) is considered by many as one of the most common turfgrass pests. Originally native to Europe, annual bluegrass is now distributed throughout the United States as well as in varied parts of the world. The species grows under a wide range of cultural, soil, and climatic conditions. Annual bluegrass has been found growing from seashore to mountain regions. It grows under both low and high fertility levels as well as a wide range of cutting heights. Annual bluegrass is comparatively well adapted to compacted soil conditions. Several problems cause annual bluegrass to be classified as a turfgrass pest. The most objectionable of these charac- teristics is the lack of tolerance to environmental stresses. Annual bluegrass is susceptible to high and low temperature injury. Furthermore, the plant lacks hardiness to drought stress. The second major problem is its prolific seedhead production. An individual annual bluegrass plant can produce hundreds of seeds over a growing season. The ability of the plant to produce abundant seeds occurs even at close cutting heights. A new problem with annual bluegrass is being recog- nized in this modern era of atmospheric pollutants. It is highly susceptible to smog damage. Much has been said and written over the years concerning the annual bluegrass problem in intensively cultured turfs. Most research projects conducted with annual bluegrass have dealt with methods of chemical control. Many herbicides have been evaluated in an attempt to produce an effective control program. The results have been erratic. variability within the annual bluegrass Species may be one of the reasons for the erratic control. Because of this, many professional turf managers have abandoned chemical control programs and have chosen to "live" with annual bluegrass. Some have been quite successful in this endeavor, while others have failed due to a lack of knowledge concerning the cultural requirements of annual bluegrass. The objectives of this investigation were to define some of the cultural and environmental conditions which influence annual bluegrass infestations. Temperature response, cutting height, fertility level, and root development rate were studied to determine their effects on the competitiveness and survival of annual bluegrass. These effects were studied within both seedling and established turfgrass communities. The annual bluegrass reSponses were compared with Merion Kentucky bluegrass (Poa pratensis L.) and Penncross creeping bentgrass (Agrostis palustris Huds.) throughout the investi- gation. LITERATURE REVIEW General Description Annual bluegrass (Poa annua L.) is a diminutive, low growing plant. Although generally considered a bunch-type grass some strains are creepers (7). Annual bluegrass possesses a light green to greenish-yellow color (7, 22). Sprague and Burton (34) reported that annual bluegrass remained vivid green as autumn approached. Tutin (37) reported that annual bluegrass was a cross between Poa infirma H.B.K., an annual plant, and £22 supina Schrad. a perennial plant. The chromosome number of annual bluegrass is 2n=28 (27). The Species possesses two large chromosomes and one small chromosome. In addition, Koshy (27) reported that annual bluegrass had three groups of chromosomes containing 2, 4, and 5 chromosomes respectively. Juhren, et. al., (24) observed that annual bluegrass reached the 2-leaf stage of develOpment one week after emergence. Some plants were observed by Arber (2) to have replaced their leaf traces with branch traces. She also observed a strong tendency of the inflorescences to remain leafless. Annual bluegrass is reported to be among the first turf- grasses to resume growth in the spring (25, 34). In addition, Kerr (26) felt that the rapid shoot growth of annual bluegrass 3 contributed to its highly competitive nature. The growth rate was observed to become more rapid when the seedling plant had developed to the third leaf stage (24). Although most abundant in spring, annual bluegrass plants began to disappear in midsummer (34). Monteith (31) also reported the disappearance of annual bluegrass in May. The lack of toler- ance to heat and drought stresses may have accounted for these observations. Sprague and Burton (34) concluded that midsummer conditions in open areas were unfavorable for the growth of annual bluegrass. They found that the most favor- able conditions occurred after mid-August. Sprague and Burton (34) further believed that annual bluegrass began its growth in the late summer/early fall period. They reported that annual bluegrass would continue to grow in the fall as long as the soil remained unfrozen. Younger (39) explained the growth pattern of annual blue- grass by reporting that high soil moisture levels were common to annual bluegrass survival. Sprague and Evaul (35) also showed that annual bluegrass was more tolerant of excess moisture. They found that maximum growth was achieved when the soil moisture level was 50-60% of the soil water holding capacity. It was also reported that annual bluegrass was eliminated at low moisture levels (39). This would explain the disappearance of annual bluegrass during midsummer drought periods. Excessive wear during the midsummer period was another factor contributing to the disappearance of annual bluegrass (26). The leaf structure of annual bluegrass is similar to the other bluegrasses. Annual bluegrass possesses the boat-shaped leaf tip which is characteristic of all bluegrasses. Brobrov (11) observed the ligule of annual bluegrass to be larger than the ligule of Kentucky bluegrass (Egaflpratensis L.) and similar to the ligule of rough bluegrass (Poa trivialis L.). Brobrov (11) described the leaf as being strap-shaped and parallel veined with a prominent mid-rib. The leaf also possesses pairs of bulliform cells flanking the mid-rib (2, ll). Arber (2) reported a simple leaf epidermis consisting of smooth- walled cells. Brobrov (11) reported that the epidermal cells were rectangular shaped. The cuticle layer covering the epi- dermis was found to be thinner on the upper leaf surface than the lower (11). Brobrov (11) observed that the upper and lower leaf surfaces were not parallel. She also observed stomata to be more abundant on the upper surface. Rooting Annual bluegrass is commonly referred to as a shallow- rooted Species although the limited research work suggests otherwise. This widely accepted concept has resulted from casual observations of annual bluegrass in the field. However, in the field annual bluegrass is frequently found under con- ditions which are not conductive to optimum growth of the plant. These conditions include soil compaction and close mowing. under close clipping, root growth is decreased in most Species (l, 10). Kerr (26) listed the problems associated with annual bluegrass and blamed the lack of tolerance to heat stress on the plants' high transpiration rate combined with a shallow root system. Renney (32) reported that annual blue- grass will root almost entirely in the mat layer. Gibeault (l7) referred to the shallow root system of annual bluegrass as being associated with frequent irrigation under putting green conditions. Normal root depths for the turfgrasses were listed by Gibeault (17) (Table 1). Based on this table, annual bluegrass was reputed to produce a root system 1.0 - 4.0 inches in depth. This was considerably less than the rooting depths listed for creeping bentgrass and Kentucky bluegrass. Although the concensus holds that annual bluegrass is shallow rooted; limited research suggests that the Opposite is true. The earliest of these studies was conducted by Sprague and Burton (34) in New Jersey. It was concluded that under identical soil and cultural conditions annual bluegrass de- velOped a similar root system to Kentucky bluegrass and colonial bentgrass. Sprague and Burton (34) also concluded that annual bluegrass produced a far denser root system in well aerated soils than in compacted soils. Beard (7) com- pared the rooting of annual bluegrass to that of Poa pratensis. 'He also referred to the shallow rooted nature of annual blue- grass under compacted conditions (8). A more detailed study of root growth under compacted conditions was conducted in Rhode Island by Wilkinson and Duff (38). Annual bluegrass, Kentucky bluegrass, and Penn- cross creeping bentgrass were compared at three soil bulk densities. Root weight measurements of each species were mwuma Aonpcam A.pam3v adpmocsoOm enhnmmngopmocopmv macaw ocapmsw5< .pm THE BA: 91% om-m om-m ms-m ma.: 3 A.oaopm moacommm manhoNv mmmpmoamhou A.mnom A.Hv coauuooo cocochov mumpmmosehom A.nopnom woomcaocsnm oonpmomv mnemom Hams A.A whoop mospmomv ozommm pom A.A mam20pmpn momv mmohmosan hxospcmx A.spnfim mHDSOp mapmomm¢v mmonwucon Heaooaoo A.mo:m manpmsawa mfipmonmzzc>r mrcmemsmm I .\ .I. 3:. 2.3.02 .80 I \ xx ..... nmzzomomm I . . o/ . x ./ .500 I ~ ./ i a ./.uo do} ’0 _N00 1 /. l .000 moo moo boo ~00 03924.1 ANanmbdcmm 73 47 bluegrass was among the first grasses to resume growth in the spring. The difference may be due to differences in the annual bluegrass species. The spring green-up rate of the annual sub- species may differ from the green-up rate of the perennial sub- Species. The root growth responses to temperature are depicted in Figure 4. Again, Penncross creeping bentgrass demonstrated a wider range of temperature adaptability with significantly higher root production than the other two species at 40° and 90°F. Root growth of annual bluegrass was significantly greater at the other five temperature treatments. The optimum root growth of annual bluegrass and Merion Kentucky bluegrass was achieved at 70°F. In contrast, Penncross creeping bentgrass root growth reached its maximum at 60°F. These results were quite significant since Beard (6) reported that the Optimum root growth temperature is more important to the turfgrass plants' total growth than is the optimum temperature for shoot growth. The phenological observations and sand culture study are very important for the professional turf manager. These results give an indication of the competitive ability of the three species in response to temperature. Annual bluegrass is least able to compete with Penncross creeping bentgrass and Merion Kentucky bluegrass at the temperature extremes of 40° and 90°F. This suggests that an early spring application of a water sol- uble nitrogen fertilizer would favor the Penncross creeping bentgrass and Merion Kentucky bluegrass. Annual bluegrass was 48 Figure 4. Root growth responses of three turfgrass species to seven constant temperature treatments. E av mebdmwaZMH Itsomw wet on mmomozzma IIIII 29mm: IIII mwdmoanm 443224 ll 00. CON oon 00v 000 com 00h 00m 00m 000. (W) SLHSIEM ABC iooa 49 better able to compete at the higher temperatures than would normally be expected from previous general observations. Cockerham and Whitworth (13) reported injurious effects to annual bluegrass plants grown at 80° to 90°F temperatures for 18 hours per day. However, annual bluegrass still competed quite well at 80°F in this study. Annual bluegrass root pro- duction was also superior to the other two species at 80°F. Study II: Clipping yields were also used as a measure of shoot growth as influenced by temperature. Annual bluegrass and Merion Kentucky bluegrass were compared in this manner. The mean comparisons are presented in Table 2. No clipping yields are reported at 90°F due to death of the plugs during the sta- bilization period. There was no significant difference among annual bluegrass clipping yields within the 40°, 50°, 80°, and 100°F treatments. The shoot growth rate was equal throughout the 30 day study. There were no clippings obtained after day 15 at 100°F due to death of the plugs. Significant differences in the clipping yields of annual bluegrass were observed within the 60° and 70°F treatments. The mean dry weights increased from day 5 to day 30 in both cases. This Showed that the 60° and 70°F temperatures were most favorable for the shoot growth of annual bluegrass. This confirms the sand culture study in which maximum annual bluegrass shoot growth was attained at 60°F. The Merion clipping yields were Significant within each of the temperatures observed. At 40° and 100°F the clipping yields decreased from day 5 to day 15, and then remained con- stant through day 30 in both cases. Harrison (18) reported 50 .pmma owomm cadfipasz m.cmocsn one we HO>OH mm on» no pomoamHomHm poo one poupoa mean one ho oozoaaom oaoaoo some 2H mono: A3 A3 .mcoapmoaaooo moon» mo memos on» one OSDHOO some 2H eo>Hw mooam> .UOHQOQ coHpouHHHoepm some 03p mop weasoaaom 0 non Op coapmaoa ea can mourn woammaao AHV n o.sm o o.mmm e a.oam e n.emm c e.eom e o.ama . on n o.mm on o.omH o 0. mm o o.mmH on m.mea e p.mHH mm o o.em e n.mmm o 0. mm o e.ema on o.mea o o.emH om heeamosam o o.mm a p.mmm n m.mmm no m.meH on a. ea c m.aea ma escapee: e e.oe no e.mea n p.maa no o.sma no a. ea n p.mom 0H scene: a o.ee c p.maa c m.oea m m.HmH e o.mmH e p.mmm m - c p.mm e o.mHH e m.m H e m.eom e p.mma on I e p.mm e e.HHH on o.e a a m.ama c a.oma mm I c 0.»: on o.mm one o.mma e p.mea e o.aeH om ancamosflm e m.e e n.ee on p.me e o.mm e o.ema c m.mma ma Hashes s o.nm c m.am m m.mm on p.mHH a m.mea c m.mmH ea c p.ma c 5.0m c e.Hm c m.mm o e.eea e p.mma m 33 OOH om oa om om oe AHV ZOHBUMnAOO oszmHHo mmHommm Amov empemmmmzma so mean mnemommpe .mocoepwoap unneededeou pccumooo Ram on weaned» mmdpMMhSu can we ended» woumdaao .m mam