:4 F. a. 733:: \. .|I‘ .1... I ‘ Vivi: O in... a x. a. ' u; ‘4. . . .1... z. a. «b (— ..iir . 1r. .343? mmmwmfi . A In. . ...L . i .115: .3... 45...} ;.. a. 1&4 . . imaufipmvfiwn. . 0 .1}. .1“. Livia.“ .. ”in .. Pl. «My»? 1.42:5. .xi 1.3,. x . 4‘ 4:3! “03.03 35...... v if . uni. Plkfl . I~l:‘ .EI. _ A. $32. .. a.” . uh. tub.) {XLKH {zit fl 1 x a . .. “mum." Jr“ Hutu. .. BUR . a 4.— , mW ., aw if? 9.". ‘1. affiuris an“? .aLL: u. x r) a. \ v.. \ :r. :U «I .91 a. at: am '1 I, LIBRARIES ;-i..._.,:;--_.;; MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY 2 EAST LANSING, MICH 48824-1048 4* av ;__. I}; /géfil*/33’7 This is to certify that the dissertation entitled QUANTIFICATION OF THE AVAILABILITY OF CLAY SURFACES IN SOILS FOR SORPTION OF NITROAROMATICS presented by Simone Melanie Charles has been accepted towards fulfillment of the requirements for the Doctoral degree in Crop and Soil Sciences- Environmental Toxicology /« //2// ajor Professor’SvSignature 17th December, 2004 Date MSU is an Affinnative Action/Equal Opportunity Institution -.-.-.-.-.-.-.-,-.-I—._ —~. o---c-o—4--—.--.-.-.-.-.-~-o-p-- PLACE IN RETURN BOX to remove this checkout from your record. To AVOID FINES return on or before date due. MAY BE RECALLED with earlier due date if requested. DATE DUE DATE DUE DATE DUE 1 10:1 t1 sfizéhét 6/01 cJCIRC/DatoDuo.p65-p.15 QUANTIFICATION OF THE AVAILABILITY OF CLAY SURFACES IN SOILS FOR SORPTION OF NITROAROMATICS Simone Melanie Charles A DISSERTATION Submitted to Michigan State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Crop and Soil Sciences 2004 ABSTRACT QUANTIFICATION OF THE AVAILABILITY OF CLAY SURFACES IN SOILS FOR SORPTION OF NITROAROMATICS By Simone Melanie Charles Nitroaromatics (NACS) comprise an important class of environmental contaminants that pose a potential toxic threat to ecological and human health. To improve our understanding and modeling of the fate and transport of NACS in the environment, the effect of the interaction of soil clays with SOM must be better understood. The influence of exchangeable cation on the adsorption of p-nitrocyanobenzene (p-NCB) and 1,4-dinitrobenzene (1,4-DNB) by Webster A and B horizon soils, which contains smectite as their most abundant clay mineral, was determined. On removal of SOM from whole soils, sorption of p-NCB and 1,4-DNB increased indicating an overall negative contribution of SOM to their sorption by whole soil. The removal of the clay-Sized fraction from whole soil decreased sorption of these compounds by a factor of at least 10. This suggests that the interaction between SOM and soil clays suppresses sorption of p- NCB and 1,4—DNB by soils. We also determined, independently, the effect of exchangeable cation on sorption of 1,4-DNB by SOM and on sorption of p-NCB by whole soil, the clay-sized fraction from that soil and SOM. No effect of exchangeable cation type was found for sorption of p-NCB and 1,4-DNB by SOM. For homoionic clay- sized soil fractions, the sorption of p-NCB was generally greater by monovalent-cation- exchanged clays than divalent-cation-exchanged clays, and increased with decreasing cation hydration energy (Li+~Na+ 0.60). For each soil, the fa values decreased in the order DNT > DNB > NCB. This suggests that the nature of the NAC may also influence the mechanism driving sorption site availability. We found a strong correlation between the fa values and the strength of sorption of each NAC to smectites (_>_ 0.90 in three of four cases). Our studies reveal that for organic solutes with polar functional groups (e.g., N02) and in soils containing smectite clays, solute uptake from water will be strongly influenced by the type of exchangeable cation(s) present, the relative contents of SOM and sorptive clays (e.g., smectites) in the whole soil as well as the nature of the solute. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS “In the confrontation between the stream and the rock, the stream always wins — not necessarily through strength, but through persistence ” Anonymous The process of this study entailed character building as well as academic achievement. I am certain that I will continue to grow professionally and as an individual. My appreciation extends to all those with whom I have interacted during the course of my studies; such interactions facilitated my learning and growth. I specially thank my advisor, Dr. Stephen Boyd, for his guidance, financial support, and encouragement. I have grown professionally through his leadership and I truly was honored to work with him. I extend gratitude to Dr. Brian Teppen for his constant encouragement and support during my studies. His willingness to repeatedly assist on all aspects of this study was greatly appreciated. Dr. Hui Li made a significant contribution to this study and for this, as well as his willing assistance on all aspects of the study, I am grateful. iv To Dr. Carrie Laboski and Dr. Thomas Voice, I extend many thanks for their assistance with various aspects of the study, and for facilitating discussions about the project and what questions needed to be addressed. I thank the College of Agriculture and Natural Resources and the department of Crop and Soil Science for their financial support during the final months of this study. In addition, I thank the faculty and staff of the CSS department with specific thanks to Dr. Kravchenko who worked tediously with me on the statistics of this project. Thanks also to my colleagues, both past and present, who have assisted me to some degree to reach my goals. To my family, Melvin, Sheila, Marlene and Suzanne Charles, I extend great thanks for their prayers, support, life-long encouragement, and their faith in my ability to complete this task. To Rev. Mark and Cheryl McKeel, Dr. Cheron Herrera—Lezama and my dear friends, I also say thank you. Bountiful thanks to God for His Graces given that I might accomplish this task. TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES ........................................................................ viii LIST OF FIGURES ........................................................................ xii CHAPTER 1 EFFECTS OF EXCHANGEABLE CATION ON SORPTION OF NITROCYANOBENZENE TO SURFACE SOILS Abstract ............................................................... 1 Introduction ............................................................... 2 Experimental Section ...................................................... 5 Results and Discussion ............................................. 11 Conclusion ............................................................... 33 References ............................................................... 34 CHAPTER 2 AVAILABILITY OF CLAY SURFACES IN SOILS FOR ABSORPTION OF ORGANIC CONTAMINANTS Abstract ............................................................... 38 Introduction ............................................................... 40 Experimental Section ...................................................... 45 Results and Discussion ............................................. 51 Conclusion ............................................................... 65 References ............................................................... 66 vi CHAPTER 3 SORPTION OF P-NITROCYANOBENZENE TO SOILS: THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN SOIL PROPERTIES AND AVAILABILITY OF CLAY SURFACES Abstract ............................................................... 71 Introduction ............................................................... 72 Experimental Section ...................................................... 74 Results and Discussion ............................................. 80 Conclusion ............................................................... 96 References ............................................................... 97 CHAPTER 4 SORPTION OF NONIONIC ORGANIC COMPOUNDS TO SOILS: THE COMPOUND SPECIFICITY OF AN AVAILABILITY INDEX Abstract ............................................................... 1 02 Introduction ............................................................... l 04 Experimental Section ...................................................... 106 Results and Discussion ............................................. 112 References ............................................................... 1 32 CONCLUSION ........................................................................ 136 vii LIST OF TABLES Table 1.1 .................................................................................. 14 Measured SOM, clay content and CEC for Webster A and B (whole soils and soils from which SOM was removed), peat, Houghton muck (HM) and Brookston loam (BL) soils. Calculated Qom values derived from sorption isotherm data for trichlorobenzene (TCB), p-nitrocyanobenzene (p-NCB) and 1,-4 dinitrobenzene (1,4-DNB) by K- and Mg2 - saturated soils at an equilibrium concentration of 5 mgL'l. Table 1.2 ................................................................................. l7 Freundlich sorption equation Kf and n values used to calculate Qom values derived from sorption isotherm data for trichlorobenzene (TC132), p-nitrocyanobenzene (p-NCB) and 1,4—dinitrobenzene (1, 4- -DNB) by K- and Mg2 -saturated soils at an equilibrium concentration of 5 mgL'l. Table 1.3 ................................................................................. 27 Comparison of amount of solute sorbed per unit mass of sorbent (Q) at an equilibrium concentration of 5 mgL for p-nitrocyanobenzene sorption by homoionic Webster A clay- sized fraction and Webster A unfractionated soil (Q values also normalized to lowest Q value). Table 1.4 ................................................................................. 28 Freundlich sorption equation Kf and n values used to calculate the amount of solute sorbed per unit mass of sorbent (Q) at an equilibrium concentration of 5 mgL for p- nitrocyanobenzene sorption by homoionic Webster A clay-sized fraction and Webster A unfractionated soil. Table 2.1 ................................................................................. 60 Calculated f values for p-nitrocyanobenzene (p-NCB) sorption by Webster A soil using Karickhoffs equation [1] (using p-NCB sorption by K- and Mg2 -saturated peat, Houghton muck and Brookston loam to determine the Km, term), average f values for K- and Mg2 -saturated sorbents and our alternative equation [2]. viii Table 2.2 ................................................................................. 63 Calculated fa values for diuron sorption by Webster A soil using Karickhoffs equation [1] (using diuron sorption by K+- and Mg2+-saturated peat to determine the K0m term), average fa values for K+- and Mg2+-saturated sorbents and our alternative equation [2]. Table 3.1 ................................................................................. 81 Physicochemical characteristics of Webster and Clarion soils (whole soil and soils from which SOM was removed). Table 3.2 ................................................................................. 83 Freundlich equation Kr and n values for p-nitrocyanobenzene sorption by K+- and Mg2+- exchanged Webster and Clarion (A and B horizons) whole soils and soils from which SOM was removed. Table 3.3 ................................................................................. 87 The f, values for p-nitrocyanobenzene (NCB) sorption by Webster (A and B horizons) and Clarion (A and B horizons) estimated using Karickhofi’s equation [1] (using solute sorption by K+-Saturated peat, Houghton muck, or Brookston loam to determine the Km term). Table 3.4 ................................................................................. 88 The fa values for p-nitrocyanobenzene (NCB) sorption by Webster (A and B horizons) and Clarion (A and B horizons) estimated using Karickhoffs equation [1] (using solute sorption by Mg2+-saturated peat, Houghton muck, or Brookston loam to determine the Kom term). Table 3.5 ................................................................................. 90 Correlation (I value) between fa values for sorption of p-nitrocyanobenzene estimated using Karickhoff equation [1] (using solute sorption by K+-saturated peat, Houghton muck or Brookston loam to determine the K0m term) and the alternative equation [2] with percent organic matter (%OM), percent smectite (%smectite) and ratio of organic matter to smectite (%OM/%smectite). ix Table 3.6 ................................................................................. 92 Linear regression describing the relationship between fa values and %OM/%smectite. Table 4.1 ................................................................................. 113 Physicochemical characteristics of Webster and Clarion soils (whole soil and soils from which SOM was removed). Table 4. 2 ................................................................................. 118 Freundlich equation Kr and n values for p-nitrocyanobenzene,1,4-dinitrobenzene and 2 ,4-dinitrobenzene sorption by K- and Mg2 -exchanged Webster and Clarion (A and B horizons) whole soils and soils from which SOM was removed. Table 4.3 .................................................................................. 122 The fa values for p-nitrocyanobenzene (NCB), 1,4-dinitrobenzene (DNB), and 2,4- dinitrotoluene (DNT) sorption by Webster (A and B horizons) and Clarion (A and B horizons) estimated using Karickhoffs equation [1] (using solute sorption by K+- saturated peat to determine the K0m term). Table 4. 4 ................................................................................. 123 The f values for p-nitrocyanobenzene (NCB),1,4-dinitrobenzene (DNB), and 2, 4- dinitrotoluene (DNT) sorption by Webster (A and B horizons) and Clarion (A and B horizons) estimated using Karickhoff’s equation [1] (using solute sorption by Mg2 - saturated peat to determine the K0'“ term). Table 4.5 .................................................................................. 124 The fa values for p-nitrocyanobenzene (NCB), 1,4-dinitrobenzene (DNB), and 2,4- dinitrotoluene (DNT) sorption by Webster (A and B horizons) and Clarion (A and B horizons) estimated using our alternative equation [2]. Table 4.6 .................................................................................. 126 Correlations between fa values for sorption of p-nitrocyanobenzene (NCB), 1,4- dinitrobenzene (DNB) and 2,4-dinitrotoluene (DNT) estimated using Karickhoff equation [1] (using solute sorption by K+-saturated peat to determine the K0'“ term) and our alternative equation [2] and percent organic matter (%OM), percent smectite (%smectite) and ratio of organic matter to smectite (%OM/%smectite). Table 4.7 ................................................................................. 127 Amount of solute sorbed to K+-beidellite (Qbeidellite) and peat (pr) soil at an equilibrium concentration of 10 mg L'1 and the ratio of extents of p-nitrocyanobenzene (NCB), 1,4- dinitrobenzene (DNB), and 2,4-dinitrotoluene (DNT) sorption by SOM and K+-beidellite. Regression correlations between fa values estimated using Karickhoff equation [1] (using solute sorption by K+-satIIrated peat to determine the K0... term) and our alternative equation [2] and chdcimc and the ratio of extents of solute sorption by SOM and K+- beidellite (Kom/Ksmectite)- xi LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1.1 ................................................................................. 13 X-Ray spectra of Webster A (1) and B (2) soils, Mg2+-exchanged, air dried. Figure 1.2 ................................................................................. 15 Adsorption isotherms for sorption of p-nitrocyanobenzene (NCB) and 1,4-dinitrobenzene (DNB) by Webster A (KL-saturated) soil fractions. Figure 1.3 ................................................................................. 16 Adsorption isotherms for sorption of p-nitrocyanobenzene (NCB) and 1,4-dinitrobenzene (DNB) by Webster B (K+-saturated) soil fractions. Figure 1.4 ................................................................................. l9 Adsorption isotherms for sorption of 1,2,4-trichlorobenzene (TCB) by (a) K+-saturated peat, Houghton muck, Brookston loam, Webster A, Webster B, Webster A and B from which bulk SOM was removed and (b) sorption isotherms normalized to amount of SOM in soils. Figure 1.5 ................................................................................. 20 Adsorption isotherms for sorption of 1,2,4-trichlorobenzene (TCB) by (a) Mg2+-sat11rated peat, Houghton muck, Brookston loam, Webster A, Webster B, Webster A and B from which bulk SOM was removed and (b) sorption isotherms normalized to amount of SOM in soils. Figure 1.6 ................................................................................. 21 Adsorption isotherms for sorption of p-nitrocyanobenzene (p-NCB) by (a) Kt and Mg”- saturated peat, Houghton muck, Brookston loam and (b) sorption isotherms normalized to amount of SOM in the soils. Figure 1.7 ................................................................................. 22 Adsorption isotherms for sorption of 1,4-dinitrobenzene (DNB) by (a) K+- and Mg2+- saturated peat, Houghton muck, Brookston loam and (b) sorption isotherms normalized to amount of SOM in the soils. xii Figure 1.8 ................................................................................. 24 Adsorption isotherms for sorption of p-nitrocyanobenzene by K+-saturated reference clays (illite IMt-2; beidellite; montmorillonite SWy-2). Figure 1.9 ................................................................................. 26 Adsorption isotherms for sorption of p-nitrocyanobenzene (p-NCB) by clay-sized fraction of Webster A soil exchanged with various cations (Cs+, K+, Na+, Li+, Ba2+, Mg”, and Ca2+). Figure 1.10 ................................................................................. 32 Adsorption isotherms for sorption of p-nitrocyanobenzene by Webster A soils exchanged with various cations (CS+, K+, Na+, Li+, Ba2+, Mg”, and Ca2+). Figure 2.1 ................................................................................. 52 Adsorption isotherms for sorption of p-nitrocyanobenzene (p-NCB) by (a) KT- and Mg”- saturated peat, Houghton muck, Brookston loam and (b) sorption isotherms normalized to amount of SOM in the soils. Figure 2.2 ................................................................................. 53 Adsorption isotherms for sorption of diuron by K+- and Mg2+-saturated peat, Houghton muck, Brookston loam. Figure 2.3 ................................................................................. 55 Adsorption isotherms for p-nitrocyanobenzene (p-NCB) and diuron sorption by K+- and Mg2+-saturated by Webster A soil (whole soil and soil from which SOM was removed). Figure 3.1 ................................................................................. 82 X-ray diffraction spectra for Mg2+-saturated clay-sized fraction isolated by Webster and Clarion (A and B horizons) soils. Figure 3.2 ................................................................................. 84 Adsorption isotherms for sorption of p-nitrocyanobenzene by K+- and Mg2+-saturated Webster and Clarion (A and B horizon) soils. xiii Figure 3.3 ................................................................................. 93 Linear regressions of f8 values obtained from data analysis of p-nitrocyanobenzene (p- NCB) sorption data using Karickhoff equation [1] and our alternative equation [2] across 4 specified concentrations (5, 10, 15, 20 mg L'l) versus ratio of SOM to smectite content (%OM/%smectite) across 4 soils (Webster A, Webster B, Clarion A, Clarion B). Sorption of p-NCB to K+-peat, Houghton muck, or Brookston loam was used to obtain the Korn term in Karickhoff equation [1]. Figure 4.1 ................................................................................. 114 Isotherms for sorption of p-nitrocyanobenzene (p-NCB), 2,4-dinitrotoluene (DNT), and 1,4-dinitrobenzene (DNB) by K+- and Mg2+-saturated Webster A (WA) and Webster A soil from which SOM was removed (WAO). Figure 4.2 ................................................................................. 115 Isotherms for sorption of p-nitrocyanobenzene (NCB), 2,4-dinitrotoluene (DNT), and 1,4-dinitrobenzene (DNB) by K+- and Mg2+-saturated Webster B (WB) and Webster B soil from which SOM was removed (WBO). Figure 4.3 ................................................................................. 116 Isotherms for sorption of p-nitrocyanobenzene (NCB), 2,4-dinitrotoluene (DNT), and 1,4-dinitrobenzene (DNB) by K+- and Mg2+-saturated Clarion A (CLA) and Clarion A soil from which SOM was removed (CAO). Figure 4.4 ................................................................................. 117 Isotherms for sorption of p-nitrocyanobenzene (p-NCB), 2,4-dinitrotoluene (DNT), and 1,4-dinitrobenzene (DNB) by K+- and Mg2+-saturated Clarion B (CLB) and Clarion B soil from which SOM was removed (CBO). Figure 4.5 ................................................................................. 130 Isotherms for sorption of p-nitrocyanobenzene (NCB), 2,4-dinitrotoluene (DNT), and 1,4-dinitrobenzene (DNB) by K+-beidellite. Figure 4.6 ................................................................................. 131 Isotherms for sorption of 1,3,5-trinitrobenzene by K+- and Mg2+-saturated Webster B (WB) and Webster B from which SOM was removed (WBO). xiv CHAPTER 1 EFFECTS OF EXCHANGEABLE CATION ON SORPTION OF NITROCYANOBENZENE TO SURFACE SOILS ABSTRACT The influence of exchangeable cation on the adsorption of p-nitrocyanobenzene (p-NCB) and 1,4-dinitrobenzene (1,4—DNB) by Webster A and B horizon soils, which contain smectite as their most abundant clay mineral, was determined. On removal of soil organic matter (SOM), sorption of p-NCB and 1,4-DNB increased indicating an overall negative contribution of SOM to their sorption by whole soil. This suggests that SOM suppresses sorption of p-NCB and 1,4-DNB by soil mineral components. Removal of the clay-sized fraction from whole soil decreased sorption of these compounds by a factor of at least 10. We determined, independently, the effect of exchangeable cation on sorption of 1,4-DNB by SOM, and on sorption of p-NCB by whole soil, the clay-Sized fraction of soil and SOM. No effect of exchangeable cation type was found for sorption of p-NCB and 1,4- DNB by SOM. For homoionic clay-sized soil fractions, the extent of p-NCB sorption was generally greater for monovalent-cation-exchanged clays than divalent-cation-exchanged clays, and increased with decreasing cation hydration energy (CS+>K+>Na+~Li+ and Ba2+>Mg2+~Ca2+). The same trends were observed for homoionic soils exchanged with monovalent and divalent cations. INTRODUCTION Nitroaromatic compounds (NACS) are commonly used as pesticides, explosives, and intermediates in the synthesis of dyes, ammunition and solvents. Their uses and manufacture have resulted in contamination of soils, sediments, quarries and aquifers. In order to assess the fate of NACS in the environment, their mobility and reactivity in the soil must be understood. Sorption processes play an important role in determining mobility, translocation, and (bio)availability of these solutes in soil. Clay minerals and organic matter are generally considered the two most active soil components in the sorption of aqueous phase organic contaminants. For many nonpolar organic compounds, sorption is highly correlated with the organic carbon (OC) content of a soil or sediment and is relatively independent of other sorbent properties (Chiou et al., 1979, 1983; Karickhoff et al., 1979). This has been observed as linear relationships between the organic carbon normalized sorption coefficient (K00) and the octanol-water partition coefficient (KW) (a direct relationship) and water solubility (8..) (an inverse relationship) of nonpolar organic compounds (Chiou, 2002). In these instances sorption has been conceptualized as solute partitioning into SOM (Chiou et al., 1979, 1983; Karickhoff, 1979). It has been further suggested that adsorption of such solutes by mineral phases in soils is suppressed by the preferential adsorption of water (Chiou, 2002). However, many pesticides and organic contaminants, e.g. NACS, contain polar functional groups that can engage in specific interactions with clays even in the presence of bulk water. In fact, compared on a unit mass basis, adsorption of NACS from water by smectite clays was greater than that by SOM (Sheng et al., 2002). Thus, clay minerals may play a dominant role in sorption of certain polar organic molecules, particularly in geosorbents with low SOM contents (Weissmahr etal., 1999). Several studies have reported the high affinity of NACS for smectites in aqueous solution (Haderlein et al., 1996; Weissmahr et al., 1998; Boyd et al., 2001; Sheng et al., 2002; Johnston et al., 2001; Johnston et al., 2002). This has been attributed to the formation of electron donor (clay) — acceptor (NAC) complexes facilitated by the electron withdrawing properties of the nitro (N02) group (Weissmahr et al., 1997). Alternatively, complexation of the N02 groups of NACS with exchangeable cations on the clay has been suggested as a primary sorption mechanism (Boyd et al., 2001). Partial solute dehydration associated with adsorption in smectite interlayers of optimal distance (ca. 12.3 A) also provides favorable energy for adsorption (Boyd et al., 2001; Li et al., 2004). Several studies document the importance of the nature of the exchangeable cation on sorption of NACS by clays. Sorption of NACS by reference smectite clays was favored by weakly hydrated exchangeable cations and a low surface charge density of the clay (Haderlein et al., 1993; Weissmahr et al., 1997; Boyd et al., 2001; Sheng et al., 2002). These factors combine to manifest optimal interlayer distances, and promote NAC interactions with exchangeable cations (Boyd et al., 2001). Significant adsorption of NACS by smectite clays was observed in the presence of weakly hydrated cations (e.g. K+, Cs+, NHX), while strongly hydrated cation-systems (e.g. Na+, Mg”, Ca”) exhibited low adsorption of NACS (Haderlein et al., 1993). These results agree with the lower sorption observed for 2,4-dinitro-o-cresol (DNOC) sorption by smectite clays saturated with more strongly hydrated cations (Sheng et al., 2002). Johnston et al. (2002) reported Shifts in the N02 vibrational modes of 1,3,5-trinitrobenzene (1,3,5-TNB) on its adsorption by K+-Smectite using Fourier Transformed Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR). They attributed these shifts in N02 vibrational modes (vasym and vsym (~NO) bands) to complexation of K+ by N02 groups. These Shifts were not observed for smectites saturated with more strongly hydrated cations (i.e. Na+, Mg”, Ca2+ and Ba”). Overall, cation hydration seems to be a central determinant of NAC sorption by reference smectite clays. Sorption of NACS occurs primarily in the interlayers of these clays, and cation hydration determines the interlayer distance, the effective size of adsorption domains between cations, and the ability of N02 groups to complex directly with exchangeable cations (Boyd et al., 2001; Johnston et al., 2001, 2002; Sheng et al., 2002; Li et al., 2004). Although the effect of cation saturation on NAC sorption by homoionic clays is well documented, little is known about the effect of exchangeable cation type on sorption by soils with relatively high SOM contents, or on the relative contributions of soil organic and mineral components on NAC sorption and how this might be affected by the nature of the exchangeable cation. The objective of this study was to document the effect of exchangeable cation type on NAC sorption by whole soil, SOM and the soil clay-mineral fraction. EXPERIMENTAL SECTION A clay loam Webster soil (fine loamy, mixed, mesic Typic Haplaquoll) (Soil Survey Staff, NRCS) (A and B horizons) was fractionated by standard procedures (Kunze & Dixon, 1986). Carbonates (CO3), SOM, iron oxides (Fer), and clay-sized particles were sequentially removed from each soil horizon. Carbonates were removed using 0.5N sodium acetate acidified to pH 5 at 80°C, followed by the removal of SOM using 30% H202 at 80°C, followed by the removal of free Fer using the citrate-bicarbonate- dithionite method. The clay-sized fraction (<2.0 um) was obtained by wet sedimentation of the CO3-OM-Fe-removed soil fraction (Whittig & Allardice, 1987). The fraction remaining after the removal of CO3, SOM, Fer and clay-sized particles was termed the residual soil fraction. The masses of CO3 and Fer removed, and the mass of residual fraction remaining were determined gravimetrically. Additional soils used were a Pahokee peat, Houghton muck and Brookston loam. The SOM content of whole soils and the amount of SOM remaining after extraction of bulk SOM using H202 were determined by the Michigan State University (MSU) Soil Testing Laboratory using dry combustion and a Leco carbon analyzer (St. Joseph, Michigan) (Nelson and Sommers, 1996). The content of clay-sized particles in the Webster soils was determined by the MSU Soil Testing Laboratory using the hydrometer method (Gee and Bauder, 1986). To prepare homoionic sorbents, soil and soil fractions (ca. 100 g) were washed with 200 ml of a 0.1M solution of the cation chloride salt overnight, thereafter centrifuged and the supernatant discarded; this procedure was repeated five times. The soils were then washed with approximately 200 ml of Millipore Milli-Q (Billerica, Massachusetts) deionized H2O, thereafter centrifuged and the supernatant tested with AgNO3; the procedure was repeated until a negative Cl' ion test with AgNO3 was obtained. The soils were then freeze-dried and stored at room temperature (23 :l: 1°C) until used. Para-nitrocyanobenzene (p-NCB), 1,4-dinitrobenzene (1,4-DNB) and 1,2,4- trichlorobenzene (1,2,4-TCB) were purchased from Aldrich Chemical Company (Milwaukee, Wisconsin) with purities of 97%, 98%, and 99% respectively, and used as received. For p-NCB, 1,4-DNB, and 1,2,4-TCB, the water solubilities (SW) at 25°C are 1650, 69 and 49 mg L", respectively; the log Kow values are 1.19, 1.46, and 4.02, respectively (Howard and Meylan, 1997). Sorption of solutes by K+-saturated soil and soil fractions were measured in triplicate using a batch equilibrium technique. This involved adding aqueous solutions of p-NCB, 1,4-DNB, or 1,2,4-TCB over a range of initial concentrations (Ci, 1-42 mg L’1 for p—NCB and 1,4-DNB; 1-30 mg L'1 for 1,2,4-TCB) to a known mass of soil. Initial solutions of the compounds were prepared in 0.05M solution of the cation chloride salt. Total initial volumes of 5 ml (p-NCB, 1,4-DNB) or 7 ml (TCB) were pipetted into 7.5 ml borosilicate glass vials containing various amount of sorbent (0.1-0.4g for p-NCB and 1,4-DNB; 0.04-0.35g for 1,2,4-TCB). The vials were rotated continuously ovemight (24 hours) in the dark at room temperature (23 i 1°C); preliminary studies showed equilibrium was reached within 24 hours (data not provided). The liquid and solid phases were separated by centrifugation at 4068g for 40 min, and the solute’s equilibrium aqueous concentration (Ce) measured using a Perkin-Elmer high performance liquid chromatograph (HPLC) (Perkin-Elmer, Norwalk, Connecticut). This instrument consisted of a binary liquid chromatography pump 250 with a series 200 autosampler and a uv-visible detector set at a suitable adsorption wavelength for the respective compound (1. 254, 262, and 228nm for p-NCB, 1,4-DNB, and 1,2,4-TCB, respectively). An Alltech platinum EPS C18 column (Deerfield, Illinois) was used for p-NCB and 1,4-DNB. A Varian microsorb-MV C18 column (Palo Alto, California) was used for 1,2,4-TCB. The mobile phase was an isocratic mixture of methanol (HPLC grade) and Milli-Q deionized water (methanol: water ratios of 55:45 for p-NCB, 65:35 for 1,4-DNB, and 92:8 for 1,2,4-TCB) with a flow rate of 1.0 m1 min'l. The amount of solute sorbed by each sorbent was calculated as the difference between C; and Cc. Compound recoveries in control vials without sorbent were above 95%. Because of the high solute recoveries, the data were not adjusted. The effect of exchangeable cation type on sorption by SOM was evaluated using either organic soils relatively devoid of mineral matter or a mineral soil devoid of swelling clays (i.e. smectites) implicated in the sorption of NACS (Boyd et al., 2001; Haderlein et al., 1993). The sorbents used were the Pahokee peat (euic, hyperthermic Lithic Medisaprist), Brookston loam (fine-loamy, mixed, superactive, mesic Typic Argiaquoll) and Houghton muck (euic, mesic Typic Haplosaprist) (Soil Survey Staff, NRCS). The peat was purchased from the International Humic Substances Society (BS103P) (Denver, Colorado). The Brookston loam was obtained from Ionia, Michigan, and the Houghton muck from Bath, Michigan. Sorption isotherms for p-NCB and 1,4-DNB, and 1,2,4-TCB by these soils were obtained using the batch equilibrium technique described above. These soils were saturated with K+ or Mg2+ to evaluate the effect of cation type on sorption of NOCs. The unfractionated Webster soil (A horizon) and its isolated clay-sized fraction were saturated with different exchangeable cations (CS+, K+, Na+, Li+, Mg”, Ca2+) to determine the effect of exchangeable cation on sorption of p-NCB. Batch equilibrium experiments were conducted using the M“+-saturated soil clay fractions and whole soils with p-NCB as the sorbate. Sorption of p-NCB by K+-saturated reference clays which are representative of the identified clay types in the soil clay fraction (see below) were also measured using batch equilibrium experiments as described above. The clays used were: Wyoming montmorillonite (SWy-2), illite (IMt-2) and kaolinite (KGa-2) obtained fi'om the Clay Minerals Society Source Clay Repository (Columbia, MO) and beidellite from Ward’s Natural Science (Rochester, NY). X-ray diffraction (XRD) was used to identify the clay mineralogy of the clay-sized fractions (Whittig and Allardice, 1987). Oriented samples of Mg2+- and K+-saturated soil clay-Sized fractions were prepared by dropping suspensions of the clay-sized materials on glass Slides, then air-drying, heating at 500°C, and treatment with ethylene glycol. Samples were analyzed using CuKa radiation and a Philips APD 3720 X-ray diffractometer (Philips Electronic Instruments, NJ). Semi-quantitative estimates for the amount of smectite in the unfractionated Webster soils was attempted using the measured cation exchange capacity (CEC) of the unfractionated soils ((Michigan State University (MSU) Soil Testing Laboratory using the ammonium acetate method (Sumner and Miller, 1996)), and an average CEC of a soil smectite and SOM of 80 and 160 cmol kg", respectively, using the equation:- CEC = (160 cmol kg")(fom) + (80 cmol kg")(fcm) (1) where for“ and fcm are the fractional SOM and smectite clay contents of the soil. The calculation assumed that the CEC of the soil originated solely from SOM and soil smectites. By comparing the X-ray diffraction peak areas associated with the non- smectite minerals to the smectite peak, we estimated the relative fractional amounts of each non-smectite non-quartz mineral present in the clay-sized fraction as a fraction of the smectite peak (illite/mica, 0.125; kaolinite, 0.125). Multiplying the percent smectite in the soil obtained using equation (1) (e.g., 24%) by the relative fractional amount of each non-smectite mineral determined from the relative peak areas in the X-ray diffraction graph, we calculated the amount of non-smectite minerals (e.g. illite/mica, 3%; kaolinite, 3%). We subtracted the estimated smectite content (e.g. 24%) from the total clay content (e.g. 31%) to obtain the amount of non-smectite minerals (e.g. 7%) and compared this value to the sum of the non-smectite minerals estimated using the peak areas (3% + 3%). Statistical Analysis The sorption coefficient (K2) and the constant related to the sorption isotherm curvature (n) were estimated using the Freundlich equation, Q=K¢C.", where Q is the sorbed solute concentration per unit mass of the sorbent (mg g'l), Kr is the sorption coefficient, n is a constant related to the isotherm curvature (concave or convex). Comparisons of sorption isotherms were made by comparing the K2 and n values for each soil-solute system using nonlinear regression in SAS (SAS Institute, 1999). A significant difference between isotherms was assigned when there was a significant difference (or = 0.05) between Kf and n or Kf values of compared isotherms (Laboski and Lamb, 2004). 10 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION The Webster soils (fine loamy, mixed, mesic Typic Haplaquoll) contain smectites (Figure 1.1). Nitroaromatics are known to be sorbed significantly by smectite clays (Haderlein et al., 1996; Weissmahr et al., 1998; Boyd et al., 2001; Sheng et al., 2002; Johnston et al., 2001; Johnston et al., 2002). The smectite contents of the Webster A and B soils, calculated using the CECS of the soils, are 24 and 16% smectite, respectively (Table 1.1) and were therefore chosen as the study soils. Removal of SOM from the Webster A and B horizons increased sorption of p-NCB and 1,4-DNB, with K+ as the saturating exchangeable cation (Figure 1.2, 1.3). In whole soil it appeared that the overall effect of SOM was to suppress sorption of NCB and 1,4-DNB, though SOM itself is undoubtedly a sorptive sink for these compounds. Karickhoff (1984) proposed that, if SOM blocked clay sorption sites, then SOM removal could result in increased sorption by clays, although this effect had not been demonstrated experimentally until now. Removal of the clay-sized fraction decreased sorption by a factor of at least 10 in all soils for both p-NCB and 1,4-DNB compared to unfractionated soil, with K+ as the saturating cation (Figure 1.2, 1.3). Given the very low sorption of NACS by free Fer (data not reported) and the established high affinity of smectites for NACS (Haderlein and Schwarzenbach, 1993; Haderlein et al., 1996; Weissmahr et al., 1997; Haderlein et al., 1993 Boyd et al., 2001; Johnston et al., 2002; Johnston et al., 2001; Sheng et al., 2002; Li et al., 2003), our data supports the premise that SOM and soil clays are the two components that significantly influence NAC sorption. The contribution by soil clays to sorption of p-NCB and 1,4-DNB was greater than the contribution by 11 SOM. The contribution of CO3 and the residual fraction to sorption of the solutes was minimal for all soils (Figure 1.2, 1.3). We found low levels of CO3 present in the unfractionated soils (data not shown) consistent with the findings of Laird et a1. (1994) for a Webster soil. The influence of exchangeable cation on sorption of organic solutes by soil will depend on its influence on the dominant soil components responsible for solute sorption, i.e. SOM and clay. Trichlorobenzene (TCB) is a nonpolar organic compound whose sorption by soil results predominated (if not exclusively) from partitioning into SOM (Chiou, 2002) The amount of TCB sorbed (Qom) by K+-saturated Houghton muck, Brookston loam and Webster soils at an equilibrium concentration of 5 mg L'1 (Table 1.1) was calculated using the Kf and n parameters from the sorption data normalized to the amount of SOM in the soils fitted to the F reundlich equation (Q = Kr * Ce"; Qom = Q / fom, where Q is the sorbed solute concentration per unit mass of the sorbent (mg g'l), K2 is the sorption coefficient, 11 is a constant related to the isotherm curvature (concave or convex), fom is the fractional SOM content of the soil). The values ranged from 2.15 to 3.60 mg g"; less than a factor of 2 (Table 1.2). The Qom values for TCB sorption by Mg2+-saturated Houghton muck, Brookston loam, peat and Webster soils at an equilibrium concentration of 5 mg L'1 ranged from 1.15 to 3.30 (Table 1.2); less than a factor of 3. The sorption isotherms for TCB sorption by K+- and Mg2+- saturated organic and mineral soils normalized to the 12 q E M c -I *3 f "r . ”I” 1 1 1 I ' N 2 MWw-J 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 Angle 2 theta Figure 1.1. X-ray spectra of Webster A (1) and B (2) soils, Mg2+-exchanged, air dried. (s, smectite; m/i, mica and/or illite; k, kaolinite; q, quartz) 13 20 82: $58 £8088 >20 .3 33888 mm comp—om own—moon 038:8? «o: - 8 3882-20 m newton guano? l om? m newton 83.0.33 I m? 3882-20 < 805.8: 66903 I O<3 < 88.8: 88303 I <3 a: 8 a: a. 8..” 3m - S R to .52 as on? a. s. s. a: 3m 2.... - em a no .52 as 9;» a: a: a. 8 m: 2a 8 E R 8 .52 .36 m? E a: a: s. 43 2a 2 em 3. mm :32 a6 <3 EMO— Sd e2 98 $6 on... 8a 2 - em ed as has .8 :3 one «2 one new Nam as - - hm... gamma 2: 3o o2 $5 2: 2a 3a - - - was 8&8 .8.— ..»2 . .x I»: .x a»: .2 a. 8.8-.. _ 82... 89 an: 8:853. 32.x. 55.x. 23:; =8 OZOm .WSES a CEO 80° .8388 mo 8088 20m 8283.“ \ AOV 835m .«o mme :83 “on C098 828 we 85088 n :50 .74 w8 m .«o 82888888 885283 8w 8 £8 vou888-+~w2 98 QM .3 80:88 5754.. 5 0808308868; 98 502.3 unenconoamxooEcd .50: 058380205 com 8% 8350mm noun—cm 80¢ 33.8w $28, :50 vogue—mo .mmom va Emo— 89385 98 AEIV x38 counwnom .83 55382 33 20m 533 89¢ £8 28 £8 BonBV m 98 < Bane? 8m 85 ES 8088 .3? .20m 38802 .2 2an l4 0.5 WA ~CO3 -CO -OM residual a <40. 0.4 ~ Concentration of NCB sorbed (mg g") 0.0 f I 0 10 20 30 Aqueous NCB concentration (mg L") 1.0 - 0 WA ‘7 0 -CO3 "‘ ' -co on a E 0.8 . v reeldual ‘ .. v b b E ,.e ‘ 8 0.6 « 2 2 m ’5’ z a h g 0.4 . .° C " E «.0 s 2 " 8 0. ‘ I", 7 v WC 0 I” .. U a . " 0.0 V ' I I I I I 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 Aqueous DNB concentration (mg L") Figure 1.2. Adsorption isotherms for sorption of p-nitrocyanobenzene (NCB) and 1,4- dinitrobenzene (DNB) by Webster A (K+-saturated) soil fractions. (carbonates removed, -C03; C03 and SOM removed, -CO3-OM; residual fraction, fraction remaining after removal of CO3, OM, free F er and clay-sized fraction, residual) (isotherms with different letters are statistically different at p < 0.05) 15 0.8 WB NCB -CO3 a -CO3-OM residual QQOO 0.6 i 0.4 . 0.2 ‘ Concentration of NCB sorbed (mg g") 0.0 :7 0 10 20 30 Aqueous NCB concentration (mg L") .3 0) WB 603 £03-OM reeldual .1) 9 _l I. a : 3.8 a; 23 em 22- «U 3 >2: 3 2.2 9. $2. a: E 3.2 ad ems E meT «m w; mm. K 3” we. _ m mm. :3. 5 :4 502 A: $8 8 mum- «Z a.» 3.3 H ”.3 Sam? 3 vow- v— 92 2.8m Sq: wadow mm mmm- any .x. ”.8393. .5 «32:: 212.. a: O .333 Avwv— way 0 .833 9.»! 95 3.3 3:23. 3:96.»: 3 uni—«5.8: O O 3 team—«8.8: O O «Econ—m no Rho—.m— ooam 55.5 :8 33559223 .8325 637.235 .038, 0 $032 8 Bum—ago: 8E 0.8 was?» 0 d8 wowmcomaofimg < 63903 98 5323 BE??? < 8533 £56an 3 £598 oaowaonoagoobfi d do.“ _.qum we 5:828:00 83.9533 5 3 Ag Sachem («o 3.2: :5. 5Q 398m 838 Mo 280:3 mo manta—=00 .m._ 2an 27 28 38d :85 53 :85 5 285 $86 m and 083 u: 326 flood :23 ”Sod 3 33¢ Rood 523 $56 5 C32 $85 E? 2.86 «z 3%.: 385 Save $85 v. $23 $85 ammo ”$3 6 z i z _ i :8 33:33.33: 553.: coma->20 .855 $8 33:03.8? < .8390? was cough,“ Edwina—o < 6690? 083080: ‘3 H8398 ocoNconowaoobEé com _.A we m we :ouwbcooaoo “nuisance an 3 2% 2888 we mmmE E5 8a won—8m 838 «o 230:8 05 03328 8 com: 83? c 98 .M .8333 5:98 com—950$ 42 2an Sorption of NACS by smecties occurs largely on the clay interlayers, and cation hydration determines the interlayer distance, the size of adsorption domains (i.e. regions of siloxane surface unobscured by water), and the ability of N02 groups to complex directly with exchangeable cations (Boyd et al., 2001). Considering the hydrated radii of Cs+, K+, Na+, Li‘“, Ba”, Ca2+, and Mg2+ (3.6, 5.3, 7.9, 10.0, 8.8, 9.6 and 10.8 A respectively) (Evangelou, 1998), it is apparent that lower cation hydration manifests larger adsorption domains between cations. Large hydration spheres and strongly held waters of hydration would act to inhibit the direct interaction of N02 groups with the interlayer cation, as proposed by Boyd et al. (2001), Johnston et al. (2001, 2002) and Li et al. (2004). The hydration sphere water molecules are less strongly held (lower enthalpy of hydration) by ions with larger ionic radii (e.g. K4) compared to ions with smaller ionic radii (e.g., Na+) and lower valence. These factors would account for the greater p-NCB sorption occurring by Cs+- and K+-exchanged soil clay fraction (ionic radii 0.169 and 0.133 nm; Athd -258 and -304 kJ mol", respectively) compared to that by soil clay fractions exchanged with Na‘“, Li", Ca2+, Mg2+ or Be2+ (ionic radii, 0.095, 0.060, 0.099, 0.065 or 0.135 nm; Athd, - 375, -481, -1515, -1258, or -1258 k] mor‘, respectively). The effect of enthalphy of hydration can be illustrated by comparing K+ and Bay. Although these ions have similar ionic radii, at an equilibrium concentration of 5mg L", our K+-exchanged soil clay fraction sorbed p-NCB to a greater extent (69 times greater) than the Bay-exchanged soil clay fraction (Table 1.3). The greater hydration sphere and hydration energy (-1290 kJ mol") of the Ba2+ ion compared to the K+ ion (-314 kJ mol'l) 29 suggests that ion-dipole interactions between the exchangeable cation and polar functional groups on the NAC would require the displacement of more strongly held water molecules in the case of Bay-exchanged system. The removal of water requires energy and so, for direct cation-solute interactions, the Baz+-exchanged system would require a larger energy input than the K+ system. Supporting F TIR studies observed -NO vibrational band shifts for 1,3,5-trinitrobenzene sorption on K+-smectite but not for Ba”- smectite @oyd et al., 2001; Johnston et al., 2001, 2002). Li et a1. (2004) calculated an enthalpy of interaction involved in complex formation between the solute and the exchangeable cation. Their analyses considered other energy yielding or consuming processes including water removal from the clay and partial dehydration of the solute in the interlayer. The interaction energies between K+-SWy-2 and 1,3,5-TNB, 1,3-dinitrobenzene (1,3-DNB) and 1,4-DNB at 80% dehydration of the solute were -99, -69, and -73 kJ mol", respectively. The calculated enthalpies of interaction between Ca2+-exchanged SWy-2 for these compounds were lower ranging from -30 to -38 kJ mol". The calculated 'interaction enthalpies help explain the observation of greater NAC sorption by the less strongly hydrated system (e.g. K+) than by the more strongly hydrated system (e.g., Ca2+). Finally, Cs+ and K+-saturated smectites manifest interlayer distances of ~ 3 A (dom ~ 12.3 A) in the presence of sorbed NACs, and this distance appears optimal for sorption of planar NACS (Li et al., 2004; Sheng et al., 2002; Sheng et al., 2001). These spacings closely match the width of p-NCB and through simultaneous interactions with the opposing siloxane sheets the adsorbed molecules are largely dehydrated (assuming 80% dehydrated in the above calculation of 30 interaction enthalpy), an energetically favorable process (Li et al., 2004). Smectites saturated with the other cations (e.g. Na“, Ba”, Ca2+) always swell to > 15 A in the presence of bulk water. The energy requirement for compressing the interlayers, and dehydrating the solute, may be larger than the energy gain from solute dehydration thereby making the overall process energetically less favorable. The effects of saturating cation on sorption of p-NCB by whole soils were similar to those by the isolated soil clay fractions (Table 1.3; Figure 1.10). Cs+ and K+-soil were approximately 14 and 9 times more effective than Na+ or Li+-soil for p-NCB sorption at an equilibrium concentration of 5 mg L'1 (Table 1.3); sorption by Cs+- and K+-saturated soils was also much higher than by the divalent-cation-exchanged soils (Table 1.3; Figure 1.10). Among the divalent cations, the extent of p-NCB sorption at an equilibrium concentration of 5 mg L'1 also increased with decreasing hydration energy (Mg2+2 mm). The soil was fractionated by standard procedures (Kunze & Dixon, 1986). Carbonates (CO3) and SOM were sequentially removed from each soil horizon. Carbonates were removed by stirring the soil with 0.5N sodium acetate acidified to pH 5 while heating at 80°C, followed by the removal of SOM with 30% H202 at 80°C (denoted OM-removed soil). Homoionic soils and soil fractions were prepared by washing the soils with 200 ml aliquots of 0.1M solution of KCl or MgCl2 overnight, thereafier centrifuging and discarding the supernatant. This procedure was repeated four times. The soils were then washed with 200 ml aliquots of Milli-Q deionized H2O, thereafier centrifuged and the supernatant tested with AgNO3. The procedure was repeated until a negative Cl' ion test with AgN03 was obtained. The soils were then freeze-dried and stored at room temperature (23 i 1°C) until used. Para-nitrocyanobenzene (p-NCB) was purchased from Aldrich Chemical Company (Milwaukee, Wisconsin) with a purity of 97% and used as received. Its water solubility (SW) at 25°C is 1650 mg L'1 and its log K0w value is 1.19 (Howard and Meylan, 1997). Diuron (1,1-dimethyl-3—(3,4-dichlorophenyl)urea was purchased from Aldrich Chemical Company (Milwaukee, Wisconsin) with a purity of 98% and used as received. Its Sw at 25°C is 42 mg L'1 and its log K0W value is 2.75 (Howard and Meylan, 1997). The clay-sized particles (<2.0 um) were obtained from soil using wet sedimentation after removal of CO3, SOM and free iron oxides (Fer) (Whittig & Allardice, 1987), then saturated with K+ and Mg2+ as described above. Dispersed suspensions of Mg2+- and K‘- 45 saturated clay-sized particles were dropped on to glass slides to produce clay films. The clay films were then treated by air-drying, heating at 500°C, and ethylene glycol. X-ray diffraction patterns of the treated clay films were used to identify the clay mineralogy of the clay-sized fraction of the soil (Whittig & Allardice, 1987). The clay samples were analyzed using CuKa radiation and a Philips APD 3720 X-ray diffractometer (Philips Electronic Instruments, NJ). Semi-quantitative estimates for the amount of smectite in the unfractionated Webster A soil was attempted using the measured cation exchange capacity (CEC) of the unfractionated soils using the ammonium acetate method (Sumner and Miller, 1996) (Michigan State University (MSU) Soil Testing Laboratory), and an average CEC of a soil smectite and SOM of 80 and 160 cmol kg", respectively, using the equation: CEC = (160 cmol kg")(fom) + (80 cmol kg")(fcm) [2] where for“ and fcm are the fractional SOM and smectite clay contents of the soil. The calculation assumed that the CEC of the soil originated solely from SOM and soil smectites. By comparing the X-ray diffraction peak areas associated with the non- smectite minerals to the smectite peak, we estimated the relative fractional amounts of each non-smectite non-quartz mineral present in the clay-sized fraction as a fraction of the smectite peak (illite/mica, 0.125; kaolinite, 0.125). Multiplying the percent smectite in the soil obtained using equation (2) (e.g., 24%) by the relative fractional amount of each non—smectite mineral determined from the relative peak areas in the X-ray diffraction graph, we calculated the amount of non-smectite minerals (e.g. illite/mica, 3%; kaolinite, 3%). We subtracted the estimated smectite content (e.g. 24%) from the total clay content 46 (e.g. 31%) to obtain the amount of non-smectite minerals (e.g. 7%) and compared this value to the sum of the non-smectite minerals estimated using the peak areas (3% + 3%). Removal of SOM with H202 may result in the liberation and/or oxidation of metals previously bound to SOM which could result in the formation of sesquioxides. The potential contribution of sesquioxides to p-NCB sorption was assessed. For this purpose ferric hydroxide was prepared by mixing FeCl; with KOH; KOH was present in excess of stoichiometric quantities needed to react with all of the ferric ions in the system. The Fe(OH)3 suspension was centrifuged for 30 min at 4068g, the supernatant discarded and the pellet washed five times with 200 ml portions of 0.1M KCl. The F e(OH)3 was then washed with deionized H2O to a negative Cl' ion test with AgNO3, freeze-dried and stored at room temperature (23 i 1°C). X-ray diffraction analysis was performed on an air-dried film of Fe(OH)3 prepared by using a disposable pipette to drop a dispersed suspension of Fe(OH)3 on to a glass slide. The effect of exchangeable cation type on sorption by SOM was evaluated using either organic soils relatively devoid of mineral matter or a mineral soil devoid of swelling clays (i.e. smectites) implicated in the sorption of NACs (Boyd et al., 2001; Haderlein and Schwarzenbach, 1993). The sorbent used was the Pahokee peat (euic, hyperthermic Lithic Medisaprist) (Soil Survey Staff, NRCS). The peat was purchased from the International Humic Substances Society (BS103P) (Denver, Colorado). Sorption isotherms for diuron by these soils were obtained using the batch equilibrium technique 47 described above. These soils were saturated with K+ or Mg2+ to evaluate the effect of cation type on sorption of diuron. Sorption isotherms for p-NCB sorption by K+- and Mg2+-saturated unfractionated soils and SOM-removed soils as well by Fe(OH)3 were obtained, in triplicate, using a batch equilibrium technique. This involved adding aqueous solutions of p-NCB (1-42 mg L") or diuron (1-30 mg L") over a range of initial aqueous concentrations (C,) to a known mass of soil. The p-NCB and diuron solutions were prepared in 0.05M KCl or MgCl2 corresponding to the saturating cation. Five ml of the solute solutions were pipetted into 7.5 ml borosilicate glass vials containing various amounts of sorbent (between 0.2 and 0.4 g for soil). The vials were rotated continuously for 24 hours in the dark at room temperature (23 i 1°C); preliminary studies showed equilibrium was reached within 24 hours. The liquid and solid phases were separated by centrifugation at 4068g for 30 min, and the solute’s equilibrium concentration in water (Ce) was determined using a Perkin- Elmer high performance liquid chromatograph (HPLC) (Perkin-Elmer, Norwalk, CT) consisting of a binary LC pump 250 with a series 200 autosampler and a uv-visible detector set at It 254 nm for p-NCB and A 248 nm for diuron. A platinum EPS C 18 column from Alltech Associates was used (Deerfield, IL). The mobile phase was an isocratic mixture of methanol (HPLC grade) and Millipore Milli-Q (Billerica, Massachusetts) deionized water (methanol: water ratio of 55:45 for p-NCB and 75:25 for diuron) with a flow rate of 1.0 ml min". The amount of solute sorbed was calculated as the difference between the initial aqueous concentration (Ci) and the final aqueous concentration (Ce). Compound recoveries in control vials without sorbent were above 48 95% and not used to adjust the data. The extent of solute sorption was quantitated by fitting the data to the F reundlich equation, Q=K¢Ce", where Q is the sorbed solute concentration per unit mass of the sorbent (mg g"), Kf is the sorption coefficient, n is a constant related to the isotherm curvature (concave or convex). The Michigan State University (MSU) Soil Testing Laboratory determined the SOM content of the unfractionated (3.87% OM) and OM-removed soil (0.23% OM) using dry combustion and a Leco carbon analyzer (St. Joseph, Michigan) (Nelson and Sommers, 1996), and the gravimetric clay content (31%) of the Webster soil by the hydrometer method (Gee and Bauder, 1986). Data Analysis Calculation of f, values Each sorption isotherm data set was fitted to the Freundlich equation, with an r2 >09 in all cases. Using the Kf and n values obtained, the Q value was calculated for four equilibrium aqueous phase concentrations, 5, 10, 15, 20 mg L". Using either the Karickhoff [1] or our alternative equation (presented below), four corresponding f, values were obtained for each soil (i.e., one for each concentration). Standard deviations of each f, value associated with each concentration were calculated using error propagation procedures. For the Karickhoff equation, only the K+-saturated system was used because preliminary results indicated that this system provides sufficient difference in sorption between the unfractionated and OM-removed soils to facilitate accurate determination of f, values. The independently obtained K0m values utilized when analyzing fa by equation [1] were previously measured as discussed in Chapter 1. 49 Estimation of degree of OM mineral surface coverage The maximum percent of the smectite clay surface covered by the SOM was estimated using Lagaly’s formula area per carbon atom of 5.67 A2 (Lagaly, 1981), a percent carbon in SOM of 62% (Stevenson and Cole, 1999), an average smectite surface area of 750 m2 g" (Sposito, 1984), the estimated percent smectite in unfractionated soil, and the measured percent SOM in the unfractionated and OM-removed soil. The operating assumption underlying this exercise was that all carbon from SOM resides on smectite surfaces. The calculation therefore provides an estimate for the maximum extent of coverage of the sorptive mineral surface by the SOM present. So: with 3.87% SOM and 24% smectite in Webster A (WA) soil: lg of WA has a surface area of oc = ((0.62 x 0.0387)/12)(6.023 x 1023)(5.67)(1O'2°) = 68.27 m2, 1 g of WA has a smectite clay surface area = (750 x 0.24) = 180 m2, therefore The maximum percent of smectite clay surface covered by CC = (68.27/180) = 38%. Statistical Analysis The sorption coefficient (Kf) and the constant related to the sorption isotherm curvature (n) were estimated using the Freundlich equation, Q=Kch". Comparisons of sorption isotherms were made by comparing the Kr and n values for each soil-solute system using nonlinear regression in SAS (SAS Institute, 1999). A significant difference between isotherms was assigned when there was a significant difference between Kf and n or Kf values of compared isotherms (Laboski and Lamb, 2004). 50 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Sorption of p-NCB and diuron by Fe(OH)3 was negligible (data not shown) and therefore sesquioxides are not expected to act as sorbents for p-NCB or diuron in whole soils. This is consistent with studies by Haderlein and Schwarzenbach (1993) who reported that NACs did not adsorb significantly to aluminum and iron (hydr)oxides, carbonates or quartz. In addition, Laird et al. (1994) found no indication of surface coatings of particles in the fine clay fraction of a Webster soil by free Fer. Considering the two soil components responsible for NAC sorption by soils, SOM and swelling clays, sorption of NACs by SOM is not influenced by the nature of the saturating cation. We observed no statistically significant effect of exchangeable cation (K+ and Mg”) on p-NCB sorption by peat, Houghton muck and Brookston loam soils or diuron sorption by peat. This was reflected in the observed proximity of the sorption isotherms for p—NCB sorption by K+- and Mg2+-saturated peat, Brookston loam and Houghton muck each normalized to the SOM content in each soil (Figure 2.1). These soils are composed of either predominantly SOM (peat and muck) or are devoid of clays known to sorb NACs (i.e. swelling clays) and therefore sorption in these systems is dominated by SOM. We also observed no statistically significant effect of exchangeable cation (K+ and Mg”) on diuron sorption by K+- and Mg2+-saturated peat (Figure 2.2). These results provide evidence that sorption of p-NCB and diuron by SOM, in systems where sorption is dominated by SOM, is not strongly influenced by the saturating cation. This can be explained by sorption to SOM being a partition process (Chiou, 2002) and such a dissolution mechanism is not expected to be influenced by the 51 ,_ 1'8 e Put-K a 7, J o Peat-Mg g 1-4 v HM-K _, v HM—Ilg : a 12 . I BL-K .9 - o BL-Mg 3 10 " e. o . a e 8 0.8 - , z 0 U- 0 ° 0.6 - ° 5 . v. - z 04 v, 1 g a .. 2 0.2 9’ - ' 8 {‘1 g .. -: "‘ ':-'-.-3:‘ :- =‘ 0.0 5“-c. I r I o 10 20 30 4o Aqueous NCB concentration, C. (mg L") "a 3'0 0 Peat (K) b ‘5” O Houghton muck (K) ‘5' 2.5 . v Brookston loam (K) o v Peat (Mg) ‘2 I Houghton muck (Mg) 2 2.0 . D Brookston loam (Mg) E . . 1.5 d v E . ' 'v .- o ‘15 - «ii 1.0 - o ;- ' ,/‘..’ g ’3' a”: '0- e {’45, I 3 0.5 4 _7”‘ 5 14-! e < 0.0 u I I I 0 1O 20 30 40 Aqueous NCB concentration, C. (mg L") Figure 2.1. Adsorption isotherms for sorption of p-nitrocyanobenzene (p-NCB) by (a) K+- and MgZI-saturated peat, Houghton muck, Brookston loam and (b) sorption isotherms normalized to amount of SOM in the soils. 52 3.5 0 peat-K Diuron Concentration of diuron sorbed. 0 (mg 9") 0.0 V I j’ I fl I I I 0 2 4 6 8 1 0 1 2 14 1 6 Aqueous diuron concentration, C. (mg L") Figure 2.2. Adsorption isotherms for sorption of diuron by K+- and Mg2+-saturated peat, Houghton muck, Brookston loam. 53 saturating cation. It appears that any significant effects of cation saturation observed for p-NCB or diuron sorption to soil and soil fractions would result from the effect of cation saturation on the sorptive characteristics of the clay-sized mineral fraction and not the SOM. The clay types in the soil clay-sized fraction were identified as mica and/or illite, smectite, vermiculite, and kaolinite. This was consistent with the clay mineralogy reported by Laird et al. (1991) for a Webster soil. Unfractionated and SOM-removed soils saturated with K+ (Kr 0.0528 and 0.0922 L kg"; n 0.5983 and 0.5012, respectively) sorbed p-NCB to a much greater extent compared to Mg2+-saturated soils (K, = 0.0067 and 0.0007 L kg"; n = 0.6219 and 0.9033, respectively) (Figure 2.3). These results are consistent with several studies that report stronger sorption of NACS by reference clays and soils saturated with cations of relatively low hydration energies (e.g. K+, Cs+) compared to that by sorbents saturated with cations of relatively higher hydration energies (e.g. Na+, Ca2+, Mg”) (Li et al., 2003; Sheng et al., 2002; Haderlein et al., 1996; Haderlein and Schwarzenbach, 1993; Weissmahr et al., 1997, 1999; Johnston et al., 2002). Cations of larger hydrated radii (e.g., Mg”) occupy a larger surface area of the clay interlayer thereby diminishing the effective size of adsorption domains between cations and facilitating less NAC sorption compared to clays saturated with cations of smaller hydrated radii (e.g., KT). In addition, hydration water associated with cations having smaller enthalpies of hydration (e.g., K+, Athd -314 kJ mol") are less strongly held compared to water molecules hydrating cations with larger enthalpies of hydration (e.g., Mg2+, Athd -1258 kJ mol"). Large hydration spheres and strongly held waters of hydration would act to inhibit the direct 54 0.5 p-NCB e WA-K a o WAC-K 0.4 - v WA-Mg v WAC-M9 .° U r P N i l P .s P o r 0 10 20 30 Aqueous NCB concentration, C. (mg L") I Concentration of NCB sorbed, Q (mg g") 0.20 0.18 ' 0.16 ' 0.14 - 0.12 i 0.10 - 0.08 - 0.06 ‘ 0.04 r 0.02 - 0.00 ' 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 Aqueous diuron concentration, C. (mg L") WA‘K Diuron <10. JV C I Concentration of diuron sorbed, 0 (mg 9") Figure 2.3. Adsorption isotherms for p-nitrocyanobenzene (p-NCB) and diuron sorption by K+- and Mg2+-saturated by Webster A soil (whole soil, WA, and soil from which SOM was removed, WAO). Isotherms with the different letters are statistically different at p < 0.05. 55 interaction of N02 groups with the interlayer cation (Boyd et al., 2001; Johnston et al., 2001, 2002; Li et al., 2004). Li et al. (2004) calculated an enthalpy of interaction between the NAC and the exchangeable cation. This calculation accounted for the associated processes of water removal required (an energy consuming process) for direct interaction between the cation and the NAC, and partial (80%) dehydration of the solute in the clay interlayers (see below). The interaction energies between K+-SWy-2 and 1,3,5- trinitrobenzene (1,3,5-TNB), 1,3-dinitrobenzene (1,3-DNB) and 1,4-DNB were -99, -69, and -73 kJ mol", respectively (Li et al., 2004). The calculated enthalpies of interaction between Cay-exchanged SWy-2 for these compounds ranged from -30 to -38 kJ mol" (Li et al., 2004). These interaction enthalpies reflect greater NAC sorption by the less strongly hydrated system (e.g. K+) than by the more strongly hydrated system (e.g., Ca2+). Previously, KI-saturated smectites were reported to manifest interlayer distances of ~ 3 A (door ~ 12.3 A) in the presence of sorbed NACs (Li et al., 2004; Sheng et al., 2002; Sheng et al., 2001); a distance which closely matches the width of p-NCB and appears optimal for sorption of planar NACs. That is, through simultaneous interactions with the opposing siloxane sheets the adsorbed molecules are largely dehydrated, an energetically favorable process (Li et al., 2004). Smectites saturated with cations such as Na+, Ca2+, or Mg2+ always swell to _>_ 15 A in the presence of bulk water. The energy requirement for compressing the interlayers, and dehydrating the solute, may be larger than the energy gain from solute dehydration thereby making the overall process energetically less favorable. Therefore Mg2+-saturated systems exhibit lower NAC sorption than K+- saturated systems (Figure 2.3). 56 Sorption of p-NCB by the Mg2+—saturated soil was greater than that by the Mg2+-saturated SOM-removed soil (Figure 2.3). Removal of SOM may liberate some clay surface sites, but, as discussed above, Mg2+-exchanged clays have low affinities for aqueous phase NACs. Hence, in the Mg2+-saturated SOM-removed soil, clays are relatively inactive as sorbents for sorption of p-NCB. Rather, SOM is the principal sorbent phase hence with its removal p-NCB sorption decreases (Figure 2.3). The K+-saturated OM-removed soils statistically sorbed more p-NCB than the K‘- unfractionated soils (Figure 2.3). This indicates that the presence of SOM in whole soil reduces p-NCB sorption. Although SOM acts as a sink for p-NCB, its removal may liberate clay sorptive surfaces which could serve as additional sites for p-NCB sorption. Additional sorption of p-NCB by these unobscured sites apparently exceeds that afforded by SOM so that the net result of SOM removal is to increase p-NCB sorption compared to that by whole soil. Suppressed sorption by OM suggests f, values (i.e. the fraction of the sorptive surfaces that are available in unfractionated soil) less than 1. To quantitatively assess fa, we used two approaches; the Karickhoff equation [1] and an alternative equation introduced herein. One potential difficulty with the determination of f,, using Karickhoffs equation [1] is the variation in the K0m values for the test solute and its potential influence on the calculated fa value. Kile et al. (1995) reported a variation of a factor of 2 to 3 for K0c (organic carbon normalized partition coefficient) values for dichlorobenzene and carbon tetrachloride for a series of soils and sediments. For solutes that sorb preferentially to SOM the effect of the variation in K0m values may be large compared to that for solutes that preferentially sorb to smectites (e. g., NACS). In addition, 57 in order to determine the isolated SOM contribution to NAC sorption by a specific soil, a surrogate for that SOM must be used as a sorbent since the SOM cannot be isolated in total or without alteration. This difficulty introduces error into the equation since Kom is not obtained by direct measurement on the system being analyzed. An alternative equation to the Karickhoff equation [1] is proposed that eliminates reliance on Kom to determine clay surface fractional availability, fa, in whole soils. It involves measuring the difference in NAC sorption between sorbent systems whose cation exchange capacity (CEC) was saturated with different cations. This method is based, in part, on the observation that NAC sorption by SOM whose CEC is exchanged with various cations was unaffected by the nature of the saturating cation (Figure 2.1 as determined in Chapter 1). Using peat, Brookston loam and Houghton muck, each saturated with K+ or Mg2+ ions, as the sorbents for p-NCB, we determined that p-NCB sorption by the corresponding K+- and Mg2+-saturated sorbent did not differ (Figure 2.1). The method is also based on the observation that NAC sorption by clay is strongly dependent on the cation saturating the clay exchange sites (Sheng et al., 2002; Johnston et al., 2001, 2002; Li et al., 2003; Haderlien et al., 1996; Haderlein and Schwarzenbach, 1993; Boyd et al., 2001). For example, K+-smectites have high affinities for NACs while Mg2+-smectites do not (Haderlein et al., 1996; Haderlein and Schwarzenbach, 1993; Johnston et al., 2001; Boyd et al., 2001; Sheng et al., 2002). We therefore propose if two experiments are done in which NAC sorption is measured for a soil saturated with K+ versus Mg2+ cations, then from equation 1: 58 Qwhole soil, K sat - Qwhole soil, Mg sat = {fa "‘ {(Kmin, Ksat * Cc * fmin)’ (Kmin, Mg sat * Ce * fmin)}} + {(Kom,1< sat "‘ Ce “ fem)- (Kora, Mg sat * Cc * fom)} [2] where Qwhote ,0“, K ,3, and Qwho.e ,0", Mg ,3. are the total contaminant masses sorbed by whole soil whose CEC is saturated with either K+ and Mg2+, respectively; Km, K 5,, and Km)“, Mg 5,. represent the partition coefficients normalized to soil fraction from which SOM was removed (mineral) for sorbent systems saturated with either K“ and Mg”, respectively; Kom, K 5,, and Kom, Mg 5,. represent the partition coefficients normalized to SOM for sorbent systems saturated with either K+ and Mg”, respectively; fmin is the fration of the whole soil remaining after removal of bulk SOM; for" is the fractional SOM contents of soil; fa represents the fractional availability of clay surfaces in whole soil. Since Kom, K sat = Kom, Mg ,3, then: Qwhole soil, K saturated - Qwholc soil, Mg saturated = {fa * {(Kmin.1( sat "' Ce * fmin)’ (Kmin, Mg sat * Cc * fmin)}} [3] Equation [3] eliminates the Korn and fom terms, which are needed in the Karickhoff [1] equation. Within both the Karickhoff [1] and alternative [3] equations, we accounted for the extent of p-NCB sorption by the residual SOM associated with the SOM-removed fraction. We determined that SOM remaining after removal of bulk SOM sorbs p-NCB similarly to that of bulk SOM. However, in the alternative equation, the effect of K+- saturated residual SOM on p-NCB sorption cancels out that of Mg2+-saturated residual SOM. When K+-saturated peat, Houghton muck or Brookston loam were used as the surrogate sorbent for determining the organic contribution in equation [1], the f, values did not differ greatly (Table 2.1). When Mg2+-saturated sorbents were used as the SOM 59 Table 2.1. Calculated f, values for p-nitrocyanobenzene (p-NCB) sorption by Webster A soil using Karickhoff’s equation [1] (using p-NCB sorption by K+- and Mg2+-saturated peat, Houghton muck and Brookston loam to determine the K0m term), average fa values for K+- and Mg2+-saturated sorbents and our alternative equation [2]. Equation Concentration 1'. values 1‘. values Average f. (mg L") (lC-saturated) (Mg2+-saturated) values Karickhoff 5 0.55 (0.02) 0.59 (0.02) 0.57 (0.02) (peat) 10 0.60 (0.02) 0.63 (0.02) 0.62 (0.02) 15 0.63 (0.03) 0.66 (0.03) 0.65 (0.03) 20 0.65 (0.03) 0.68 (0.03) 0.67 (0.03) Karickhoff 5 0.60 (0.02) 0.62 (0.02) 0.61 (0.02) (Houghton 10 0.65 (0.02) 0.66 (0.02) 0.66 (0.02) muck) 15 0.69 (0.03) 0.69 (0.03) 0.69 (0.03) 20 0.71 (0.03) 0.71 (0.03) 0.71 (0.03) Karickhoff 5 0.58 (0.02) 0.61 (0.02) 0.60 (0.02) (Brookston 10 0.62 (0.02) 0.65 (0.02) 0.64 (0.02) loam) 15 0.64 (0.03) 0.68 (0.03) 0.66 (0.03) 20 0.66 (0.03) 0.70 (0.03) 0.68 (0.03) Alternative 5 0.61 (0.02) 0.61 (0.02) 0.61 (0.02 10 0.65 (0.02) 0.65 (0.02) 0.65 (0.02 15 0.68 (0.03) 0.68 (0.03) 0.68 (0.03) 20 0.70 (0.03) 0.70 (0.03) 0.70 (0.03) Across each concentrations, f, values calculated using K+-saturated Karickhoff-peat < Karickhoff-BL < Karickhoff-HM = Alternative (p 5 0.05). The fa values at each concentration were statistically different (5ppm < 10ppm< 15ppm < 20ppm) (p < 0.05). Standard deviations in parentheses. 60 surrogate, f, values did not differ greatly from those determined using the K+-saturated sorbents (Table 2.1). This is a direct manifestation of our determination that, on a unit SOM basis, the sorption isotherms for p-NCB sorption by K+- and Mg2+-saturated peat, Houghton muck and Brookston loam were similar (Figure 2.1). The assumption is that these soils could be used to determine the isolated SOM contribution of Webster soil for sorption of p-NCB. Comparing the fa values for p-NCB sorption derived using the Karickhoff [1] and alternative [3] equation, the values did not differ greatly (Table 2.1). This is because the SOM term in the Karickhoff equation is very small (only ~20% of whole soil p-NCB sorption at Cc = 10 mg L") compared to the mineral fraction term. As noted earlier, NACs sorb to a greater extent to clays than to SOM (Sheng et al., 2001) and therefore the organic contribution and, by extension the error associated with the term, is small, when using NACs as the probe solute to estimate fa values. For diuron, the K+-saturated OM-removed soil (Kf, 0.0137 L kg"; n, 0.6043) sorbed less than K+-saturated unfractionated soil (Kr, 0.0277 L kg"; n, 0.6274) for Webster A soil (Figure 2.2). This demonstrates that SOM enhanced sorption of diuron by unfractionated soil and that removal of SOM diminished sorption in excess of any enhanced sorption that might result from increasing mineral surface availability. Sheng et al. (2001) observed greater sorption of diuron to Houghton muck soil (representing SOM) compared to K+-SWy-2 smectite. Parker and Rate (1998) suggest that surface coatings of SOM may promote sorption of the solute to soil if the SOM surface coating is a more effective sorbent than the clay particles they obscure. Murphy et al. (1990) found increased sorption of hydrophobic compounds (e.g., anthracene (log K0W 4.45)) by 61 hematite and kaolinite coated with natural humic substances compared to the pure minerals. Sanchez-Martin and Sanchez-Camazano (1991) observed that the removal of organic matter from soils resulted in less chloridazon (log Kow 1.14) sorption compared to whole soil. Cox et al. (1998) reported similar findings for imidacloprid (log K0W 0.57) sorption by soil clay fractions and model sorbents. Li et al. (2003) observed enhanced dichlobenil (log K0w 2.74) sorption by humic acid (HA)-modified Cay-smectites (SWy-2 and SAz-l) compared to that by unmodified clays. Celis et al. (1998) observed a similar trend for atrazine (log K0w 2.51) sorption by Ca-SWy-HA complexes. Pusino et al. (1992) observed decreased sorption of metolachlor (log K0w 3.13) sorption by a sandy loam and a loamy sand soil after removal of SOM. Hence, the sorption of diuron by the liberated sorption sites may not exceed that by the removed SOM and thus overall sorption decreases (Rebhun et al., 1992). For diuron, using equation [1], negative fa values were calculated using K+- and Mg2+- saturated peat to determine the SOM contribution to solute sorption (Table 2.2). In contrast, positive fa values were obtained when calculated using our alternative equation [2] (Table 2.2). The negative fa values obtained using equation [1] point out an inherent weakness in the data analysis suggested by Karickhoff (1984) especially for compounds/soils where SOM is the dominant sorptive component. We suggest that because of the sensitivity of the Karickhoff equation to the accurate determination of SOM content and Kom, the alternative equation [2] is more reliable for fa determinations. This is particularly true for compounds that sorb to SOM to a greater extent than to 62 Table 2.2. Calculated f, values for diuron sorption by Webster A soil using Karickhoffs equation [1] (using diuron sorption by K+- and Mg2+-saturated peat to determine the Kom term), average f, values for K3 and Mg2+-saturated sorbents and our alternative equation [2]. Equation Concentration 1'. values 1'. values Average 1'. (mLL'l) (1C -saturated) (Mi-saturated) values Karickhoff 5 -0.06 (-0.05) -0.46 (-0.04) -0.26 (-0.05) (peat) 10 -0.20 (-0.03) 06400.04) -0.42 (-0.04) 15 -0.30 (-0.04) -0.77 (-0.06) -0.53 (-0.05) 20 -0.38 (-0.06) -0.86 (-0.08) -0.62 (-0.07) Alternative 5 0.47 (0.07) 0.47 (0.07) 0.47 (0.07) 10 0.40 (0.05) 0.40 (0.05) 0.40 (0.05) 15 0.34 (0.04) 0.34 (0.04) 0.34 (0.04) 20 0.28 (0.05) 0.28 (0.05) 0.28 (0.05) 63 smectite clays, such as diuron (log K0w 2.68) (Sheng et al., 2001; Nkedi-Kizza et al., 1983). Our results indicate that 29% to 45% (i.e., ca. 37%) of clay surfaces are obscured from p—NCB sorption by SOM in Webster A soil. The estimate for the clay basal surface coverage by the 3.87% SOM in the Webster A soil, which included the swelling clay interlayer surface area and hence incorporates the SOM coverage of interlayer basal surfaces, was 38%. The similarity of the surface coverage estimate (38%) to the complement of the average fa value suggests that SOM covers the basal surfaces of the soil clays. We know that p-NCB and other NACs (Sheng et al., 2001, 2002; Li et al., 2003), as well as organic cations such as hexadecyltrimethylammonium (Jaynes and Boyd, 1991a), tetramethylammonium (Lee et al., 1989, 1990), and trimethylphenylammonium (Jaynes and Boyd, 1991b), intercalate between clay layers when they sorb to smectites so SOM may be occupying those interlayer sites. Obscuration of clay surfaces may also result from aggregate formation facilitated by SOM through the bridging of clay particles or reduction of repulsive forces between clay particles (Stevenson, 1994; Walker and Crawford, 1968). When diuron sorption data were analyzed using equation [2], the fa values ranged from 0.28-0.47 (i.e. ca. 0.38) indicating that, for diuron sorption, 53% to 72% of clay surfaces are obscured by SOM in Webster A soil. 64 CONCLUSION Our study reveals that the association of SOM with clay suppressed sorption of p-NCB and diuron by whole soil by at least 29 to 45% and at least 53 to 72%, respectively. In addition, the method of sorption data analysis proposed by Karickhoff (1984) for determining clay surface availability in whole soil may not be applicable for analyzing diuron sorption. F ate and transport models that utilize sorption parameters based on the additive effect of reference clay and humic material sorption may deviate from reality and may overestimate the amount of NAC sorbed. 65 REFERENCES Boyd, S.A., G. Sheng, B.J Teppen, and CT Johnston. 2001. Mechanisms for the adsorption of substituted nitrobenzenes by smectite clays. Environ. Sci. Technol. 35:4227-4234. Celis, R., J. Comejo, M. Hennosin, and W. Koskinen. 1998. Sorption of atrazine and simazine by model associations of soil colloids. Soil Sci Soc. Am. J. 62: 165-171. Celis, R., L. Cox, M. Hermosin, and J. Comejo. 1997. Sorption of thiazafluron by iron- and humic acid-coated montmorillonite. J. Environ. Qual. 26:472-479. Celis, R., C. Hermosin, L. Cox, and J. Comejo. 1999. Sorption of 2,4- dichlorophenoxyacetic acid by model particles simulating naturally occurring soil colloids. Environ. Sci. Technol. 33:1200—1206. Chiou. C. 2002. Partition and adsorption of organic contaminants in environmental systems. John Wiley and Sons, New Jersey. Cox, L., W. Koskinen, R. Celis, P. Yen, M. Hennosin, and J. Comejo. 1998. Sorption of imidacloprid on soil clay mineral and organic components. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 62: 911- 915. Gee, G. and J. Bauder. 1986. Particle-size analysis. p. 383-411. In A. Klute (ed.) Methods of Soil Analysis. Part I — Physical and mineralogical methods. 2nd ed. Agronomy. 9. ASA, Madison, WI. Haderlein, S., and R. Schwarzenbach. 1993. Adsorption of substituted nitrobenzenes and nitrophenols to mineral surfaces. Environ. Sci. Technol. 27:316-326. Haderlein, S.B., K. Weissmahr, and R. Schwarzenbach. 1996. Specific adsorption of nitroaromatic: explosives and pesticides to clay minerals. Environ. Sci. Technol. 30:612- 622. Howard, P., and W. Meylan. 1997. Handbook of physical properties of organic chemicals. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, FL. 66 Jaynes, W. and SA. Boyd. 1991a. Clay mineral type and organic compound sorption by hexadecyltrimethylammonium-exchanged clays. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 55:43-48. Jaynes, W. and SA Boyd. 1991b. Hydrophobicity of siloxane surfaces in smectites as revealed by aromatic hydrocarbon adsorption from water. Clays Clay Miner. 39:428-436. Johnston, C., M.F. de Oliveira, B.J. Teppen, G. Sheng, and SA. Boyd. 2001. Spectroscopic study of nitroaromatic-smectite sorption mechanisms. Environ. Sci. and Technol. 35:4767-4772. Johnston, C., G. Sheng, B. Teppen, S.A. Boyd, and M.F. de Oliveira. 2002. Spectroscopic study of dinitrophenol herbicide sorption on smectite. Environ. Sci. Technol. 36:5067-5074. Karickhoff, S. 1984. Organic Pollutant Sorption in aquatic systems. J. Hydraulic Eng. 110:707-735. Kile, D., C. Chiou, H. Zhou, H. Li, and O. Xu. 1995. Partition of nonpolar organic pollutants from water to soil and sediment organic matters. Environ. Sci. Technol. 29:1401-1406. Kunze, G., and J. Dixon. 1986. Pretreatment for mineralogical analysis. p. 92-99. In A. Klute (ed.) Methods of Soil Analysis. Part I — Physical and mineralogical methods. 2“". Agronomy 9. Laboski, C.A.M., and J .A. Lamb. 2004. Impact of manure application on soil phosphorus sorption characteristics and subsequent water quality implications. Soil Sci. 169: 440- 448. Lagaly, G. 1981. Characterization of clays of organic compounds. Clay Min. 16:1-21. Laird, D. 2001a. Nature of clay-humic complexes in an agricultural soil: II. Scanning electron microscopy analysis. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 65:1419-1425. 67 Laird, D., P. Barak, E. Nater, and R. Dowdy. 1991. Chemistry of smectitic and illitic phases in interstratified soil smectite. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 55:1499-1504. Laird, D., D. Martens and W. Kingery. 2001b. Nature of clay-humic complexes in an agricultural soil: 1. Chemical, biochemical, and spectroscopic analyses. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 65:1413-1418. Laird, D., Y. Yen, W. Koskinen, T. Steinheimer, and R. Dowdy. 1994. Sorption of atrazine on soil clay components. Environ. Sci. Technol. 28:1054-1061. Lee, J., M. Mortland, C. Chiou, D. Kile, and SA. Boyd. 1990. Adsorption of benzene, toluene, and xylene by two tetramethylammonium-smectites having different charge densities. Clays Clay Miner. 38: 113-120. Lee, J ., M. Mortland, C. Chiou, D. Kile, and SA. Boyd. 1989. Shape selective adsorption of aromatic molecules from water by tetramethylammonium-smectite. J. Chem. Soc. Faraday Trans. 1., 85: 2953-2962. Li, H., G. Sheng, B. Teppen, C. Johnston, and SA. Boyd. 2003. Sorption and desorption of pesticides by clay minerals and humic acid-clay complexes. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 67:122-131. Li, H., B.J. Teppen, D. Laird, C. Johnston, and SA. Boyd. 2004. Thermodynamics of nitroaromatic compound adsorption from water by smectite clay. Environ. Sci. Technol. 38:5433-5442. Liu, W., J. Gan, and S. Yates. 2002. Influence of herbicide structure, clay acidity, and humic acid coating on acetanilide herbicide adsorption on homoionic clays. J. Agric.Food Chem. 50:4003-4008. Murphy, E., J. Zachara, and S. Smith. 1990. Influence of mineral-bound humic substances on the sorption of hydrophobic organic compounds. Environ. Sci. Technol. 24:1507-1516. Nelson, D. and L. Sommers. 1996. Total carbon, organic carbon, and organic matter. p. 961-1010. In D. Sparks (ed.) Methods of Soil Analysis. Part III — Chemical methods. Agronomy. 5. ASA, Madison, WI. 68 Nkedi-Kizza, P, P. Rao, and J. Johnson. 1983. Adsorption of diuron and 2,4,5-T on soil particle-size separates. J. Environ. Qual. 12:195-197. Parker, A., and 1E. Rate. 1998. Environmental interactions of clays — clays and the environment. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany. Pusino, A., W. Liu, and C. Gessa. 1992. Influence of organic matter and its clay complexes on metolachlor adsorption on soil. Pestic. Sci. 36:283-286. Pusino, A., W. Liu, and C. Gessa. 1994. Adsorption of triclopyr on soil and some of its components. J. Agric. Food Chem. 42:1026—1029. Rebhun, M., R. Kalabo, L. Grossman, J. Manka, and Ch. Rav-Acha. 1992. Sorption of organics on clay and synthetic humic-clay complexes simulating aquifer processes. Wat. Res. 26:79-84. Sanchez-Martin, M., and M. Sanchez-Camazano. 1991. Adsorption of chloridazon by soils and their components. Weed Sci. 39:417-422. SAS Institute. 1999. SAS 8.1. SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC. Sheng, G., C. Johnston, B. Teppen, and SA. Boyd. 2001. Potential contributions of smectite clays and organic matter to pesticide retention in soils. J. Agri. Food Chem. 49:2899-2907. Sheng, G., C. Johnston, B. Teppen, and SA. Boyd. 2002. Adsorption of dinitrophenol herbicides from water by montmorillonites. Clay Clay Min. 50:25-34. Soil Survey Staff, Natural Resources Conservation Service, United States Department of Agriculture. Soil Series Classification Database [Online]. Available at http://soils.usda.gov/soils/technical/classification/scfile/index.html (verified 10 Feb. 2004) Sposito, G. 1984. The surface chemistry of soils. Oxford Univ. Press, New York, NY. 69 Stevenson, F. 1994. Humus Chemistry, Genesis, Composition, Reactions. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, NY. Stevenson, F. and M. Cole. 1999. Cycles of Soil. Carbon, Nitrogen, Phosphorus, Sulfur, Micronutrients. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, NY. Sumner, M. and W. Miller. 1996. Cation exchange capacity and exchange coefficients. p. 1201-1229. In D. Sparks (ed.) Methods of Soil Analysis. Part III — Chemical methods. Agronomy. 5. ASA, Madison, WI. Walker, A., and D. Crawford. 1968. The role of OM in adsorption of the triazine herbicides by soil. P. 91-108. In lntemational Atomic Energy Agency. Isotopes and radiation in SOM studies. International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna. Weissmahr, K., S. Haderlein, and R. Schwarzenbach. 1997. In situ spectroscopic investigations of adsorption mechanisms of nitroaromatic compounds at clay minerals. Environ. Sci. Technol. 31:240-247. Weissmahr, K., M. Hildenbrand, R. Schwarzenbach, and S. Haderlein. 1999. Laboratory and field scale evaluation of geochemical controls on groundwater transport of nitroaromatic ammunition residues. Environ. Sci. Technol. 33:2593-2600. Whittig, L and W. Allardice. 1987. X-ray diffraction techniques: Section 12-3.3. p. 338- 342. In A. Klute (ed.) Methods of Soil Analysis. Part I — Physical and mineralogical methods. 2'”. Agronomy 9. ASA, Madison, WI. 70 CHAPTER 3 SORPTION OF P-NITROCYANOBENZENE TO SOILS: THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN SOIL PROPERTIES AND AVAILABILITY OF CLAY SURFACES ABSTRACT The swelling clay and soil organic matter (SOM) contents of soils tend to correlate, yet they are typically considered to be independent sorbent phases. The inter-association of SOM with soil clays (particularly swelling clays) modified the efficacy of the soil clays for the sorption of p-nitrocyanobenzene (p-NCB). Removal of SOM from the whole soils increased sorption of p-NCB by the remaining soil fraction. The SOM thereby suppressed sorption of p-NCB by whole soil. We quantified the suppression of p-NCB by the whole soil as 17 to 53% (i.e. the fraction of the soil sorptive surfaces unavailable for p-NCB sorption was between 47 and 83%). The extent of suppression of p-NCB sorption was strongly related to the relative contents of SOM and smectite in the soils tested. 71 INTRODUCTION Soil organic matter (SOM) and soil clays are intimately associated with each other in whole soil, through mechanisms including cation exchange, Van der Waals interactions, water bridging, cation bridging and ligand exchange (Parker and Rate, 1998). Using a Webster A soil, Laird (2001) identified two types of clay-associated humic substances, (1) a diffuse filamentous film covering basal 2:1 phyllosilicate surfaces in the medium (0.02-0.2 um) and fine clay (< 0.02 pm) fractions and (2) discrete particles of high- density metal-humic complexes in the coarse clay (0.2-2.0 um) fraction. Nkedi-Kizza et al. (1983) found that SOM was primarily associated with the < 2 pm clay-sized fraction of Webster soil. A major role played by SOM might be to neutralize repulsive forces that might otherwise keep clay particles apart thereby facilitating cohesion of the clay particles (Walker and Crawford, 1968). The association of SOM with clays may influence the ability of either soil clays or SOM to sorb nonionic organic compounds (NOCs) such as nitroaromatics (NACs). For example, the interaction of pesticides with clay minerals may be limited by the availability of the clay sorption sites within soil. Our previous study (Chapter 2) revealed that availability of clay surfaces for NAC sorption by Webster soil was limited by the association of SOM with soil clays. Despite the long-standing notion that SOM obscures some of the clay surface area in soils, there is a paucity of evidence that quantitates this effect. Karickhoff (1984) proposed an equation to account for the individual contributions 72 of SOM and soil clays to NOC sorption, and for reduced availability of clay surfaces for sorption due to coverage by SOM: Qwhole soil = (fa "' Kmin * Ce * fmin) + (Kom * Ce * fom) [1] where Qwho.c so” is the total solute mass sorbed per unit mass of whole soil (mg g"), CC is the aqueous solute equilibrium concentration, and Km,“ and Kom represent the sorption coefficients of the solute to soil fraction from which SOM was removed (mineral) fraction and SOM, respectively, fmm and f0an are the fractional mineral and SOM contents of soil, and f,l represents the fractional availability of sorption sites on the clay (i.e. the fraction of sorptive surfaces available for NOC sorption in whole soil). An inherent assumption in this equation is that the sorptive capacity of the SOM is unaffected by the presence of mineral matter. An alternative method of determining f, as previously outlined involved measuring the difference in NAC sorption between sorbent systems whose cation exchange capacity (CEC) is saturated with different cations. This method is based on the premise that NAC sorption by clay is strongly dependent on the cation saturating the clay exchange sites (Li et al., 2003; Boyd et al., 2001; Sheng et al., 2001, 2002; Johnston et al., 2001, 2002; Weissmahr et al., 1997; Haderlein et al., 1996) whereas NAC sorption by SOM is unaffected by the nature of the saturating cation (Chapter 1). Both the Karickhoff approach and our alternative method revealed similar results, i.e., ~ 30-45% of p-NCB sorptive surfaces in a Webster A soil were rendered unavailable in the presence of SOM (Chapter 2). The objective of this study was to determine the availability of mineral sorptive surfaces for NAC sorption among a larger group of soils, and to relate availability to soil properties. 73 EXPERIMENTAL SECTION Both the A and B horizons of two soils, a Webster clay loam (fine loamy, mixed, mesic Typic Endoaquoll) and a Clarion sandy clay loam (fine loamy, mixed, mesic Typic Hapludoll) (Soil Survey Staff, NRCS), were air-dried and sieved to remove coarse fragments (>2mm). The soils were fractionated by standard procedures (Kunze & Dixon, 1986). Carbonates (CO3) and SOM were sequentially removed from each soil horizon. Carbonates were removed by stirring the soil with 0.5N sodium acetate acidified to pH 5 while heating at 80°C, followed by the removal of SOM with 30% H202 at 80°C (denoted OM-removed soil). Homoionic soil fractions and whole (unfractioned) soils were prepared by washing the soils with 200 ml aliquots of 0.1M solution of KCl or MgCl2 overnight, thereafter centrifuging and discarding the supernatant. This procedure was repeated four times. The soils were then washed with 200 ml aliquots of Millipore Milli- Q (Billerica, Massachusetts) deionized H2O, thereafter centrifuged and the supernatant tested with AgNO3. The procedure was repeated until a negative Cl' ion test with AgN03 was obtained. The soils were then freeze-dried and stored at room temperature (23 i 1°C) until used. Para-nitrocyanobenzene (p-NCB) was purchased from Aldrich Chemical Company (Milwaukee, Wisconsin) with a purity of 97% and used as received. Its water solubility (Sw) at 25°C is 1650 mg L" and its log K0w value is 1.19 (Howard and Meylan, 1997) Sorption of p-NCB by unfractionated soils and OM-removed soils (K+- and Mg”- saturated) were measured in triplicate using a batch equilibrium technique over a range of initial aqueous phase concentrations (Ci) (1-42 mg L") to a known mass of soil. Initial 74 solutions of p-NCB were prepared in 0.05M KCl or MgCl2 electrolyte solutions to correspond to the saturating cation of the study soils. Total volumes of 5 ml were pipetted into 7.5 ml borosilicate glass vials containing various amounts of sorbent (between 0.2 and 0.4 g). The vials were rotated continuously overnight (24 hours) in the dark at room temperature (23 i- 1°C) to ensure complete sorption; preliminary studies showed equilibrium was reached within 24 hours. The liquid and solid phases were separated by centrifugation at 4068g for 30 min, and the solute’s equilibrium concentration in water (Ce) measured. The concentrations of p-NCB in the supematants were determined by a Perkin-Elmer high performance liquid chromatograph (Perkin-Elmer, Norwalk, Connecticut) consisting of a binary LC pump 250 with a series 200 autosampler and a uv- visible detector set at It 254 nm. A platinum EPS C18 column from Alltech Associates was used (Deerfield, Illinois). The mobile phase was an isocratic mixture of methanol (HPLC grade) and Milli-Q deionized water (methanol: water ratio of 55:45) with a flow rate of 1.0 ml min". The amount of p-NCB sorbed was calculated as the difference between the initial aqueous concentration (C,) and the final aqueous concentration (Ce). Compound recoveries in control vials without sorbent were above 95% and not used to adjust the data. The extent of sorption of p-NCB by each soil was described by fitting the data to the Freundlich equation, Q = KfCe", where Q is the sorbed concentration of p-NCB per unit mass of soil (mg g"), Kr is the Freundlich constant, and n is an exponent related to isotherm shape (Chiou, 2002). The n and Kf sorption parameters were used to determine the sorption per gram of soil or clay at specific equilibrium concentrations within the data 75 range (i.e., @ 5, 10, 15 and 20 mg L"). The SOM content of the unfractionated and OM- removed soils was determined by the Michigan State University (MSU) Soil Testing Laboratory using dry combustion and a Leco carbon analyzer (St. Joseph, Michigan) (Nelson and Sommers, 1996). Soil cation exchange capacity (CBC) and gravimetric clay content was determined by the MSU Soil Testing Laboratory using the ammonium acetate method (Sumner and Miller, 1996) and the hydrometer method (Gee and Bauder, 1986), respectively. Soil pH was determined using a pH meter and 1:1 water to soil ratio (Sparks et al., 1996). X-ray diffraction (XRD) was used to identify the clay mineralogy of the clay-sized fractions (Whittig & Allardice, 1987). Oriented samples of Mg2+- and K+-saturated clay- sized particles were prepared by dropping suspensions of the clay-sized materials, isolated from the OM-removed soils on glass slides, air-drying, heating at 500°C, then treatment with ethylene glycol. Samples were analyzed using CuKa radiation and a Philips APD 3720 X-ray diffractometer (Philips Electronic Instruments, NJ). Semi- quantitative estimates for the amount of smectite in each unfractionated soil were determined assuming an average CEC for a soil smectite and SOM of 80 and 160 cmol kg", respectively, as described in Chapter 1. Data Analysis 76 Calculation of f3 values The chief goal of this work was to estimate the availability (fa) of smectite surfaces in the study soils for p—NCB sorption. Two independent equations were used for the calculation of f... First, a modified equation from Karickhoff (1984) [1]: Qwhole soil = (fa "' Kmin * Ce * fmin) + (Kom * Cc * fem) [1] where Qwhole 50,-. is the total solute mass sorbed per unit mass of soil (mg g"), Ce is the solute aqueous equilibrium concentration, and Km,“ and K0m represent the sorption coefficients of the solute by soil fraction from which SOM was removed (mineral) and SOM, respectively, fmin and fom are the fractional mineral and SOM contents of soil, respectively, and f, represents the fractional availability of sorption sites on the clay (i.e. the fraction of sorptive surfaces available for NOC sorption in whole soil). Second, an alternative equation [2] developed by us in Chapter 2: Qwhoie soil, K+ - Qwhole soil, Mg2+ = {fa * {(Kmin. K+ "‘ Ce * fmin)‘ (Kmin, Mg2+ sat * Ce * fmin)}}[2] where Qwholc so“, If and Qwholc 50,1,Mg2+ is the total solute mass sorbed per unit mass of soil (mg g") whose CEC is saturated with either K+ and Mg2+, respectively, Cc is the solute aqueous equilibrium concentration, fa represents the fractional availability of sorption sites on the clay, fmin is the fractional mineral content of the soil, and Kmin, If and Kmin, Mg2+ represent the partition coefficients normalized to soil mineral fi'action saturated with either K+ and Mg”, respectively. Within both the Karickhoff [1] and alternative [2] equations, the extent of p-NCB sorption by the residual SOM associated with the OM-removed soil must be accounted for. However, in equation [2], the sorptive contribution of K+-saturated residual SOM 77 cancels out that of Mg2+-saturated residual SOM, thus obviating the need to estimate K0m (Chapter 2). Sorption data were fitted to the F reundlich equation with r2 > 0.9 in all cases. Using the Kf and n values obtained, the Q value (amount p-NCB sorbed per mass of soil) was calculated for four concentrations that were within the data range (@ 5, 10, 15, and 20 mg L"). Using either equation [1] or [2], four fa values were obtained for each soil (i.e., one for each concentration). Standard deviations around each f, value were calculated using error propagation procedures. For the Karickhoff equation, only the K‘- saturated system was used. Estimation of degree of OM mineral surface coverage The hypothetical percentage of the mineral surface covered by a specified amount of SOM present was estimated using Lagaly’s formula area per C of 5.67 A2 (Lagaly, 1981), a percent carbon in SOM of 62% (Stevenson and Cole, 1999), an average smectite 2 g" (Sposito, 1984), the estimated percent smectite in surface area of 750 m unfractionated soil, and the measured percent SOM in each unfractionated and OM- removed soil as described in Chapter 2. The operating assumption underlying this estimate was that all C from SOM resides on smectite surfaces. Sensitivity Analysis and Validation of fa values Validation of the fa values was determined by manipulating equation [1] to give the equation: fa = _ [(Kom/Kmin) * (fom/fmin)] + (K/Kmin*fmin) [3] 78 where plotting fa versus fem/fa“n for each soil should give an intercept of 1 when the SOM content is zero (i.e., 100% availability of sorptive surfaces). Linear regression equations describing the relationship between f, values and the ratio of SOM to smectite content (fom/fsmwitc‘ or %OM/%smectite), to SOM content and to smectite content in unfractionated soils were obtained. If the calculated f. values are reasonable, the intercept of the regression equations should tend to unity (i.e., no mineral blockage by SOM) when SOM content tends to zero. Statistical Analysis The sorption coefficient (Kf) and the constant related to the sorption isotherm curvature (n) were estimated using the Freundlich equation, Q=K¢Cc". Comparisons of sorption isotherms were made by comparing the Kr and n values for each soil-solute system using nonlinear regression in SAS (SAS Institute, 1999). A significant difference between isotherms was assigned when there was a significant difference between K; and n or Kr values of compared isotherms (or = 0.05) (Laboski and Lamb, 2004). 79 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Nitroaromatics are known to be sorbed significantly by smectite clays (Haderlein et al., 1996; Weissmahr et al., 1997; Boyd et al., 2001; Sheng et al., 2002; Johnston et al., 2001, 2002). The Webster and Clarion soils contain significant amounts of smectite clays (13- 24% smectite) (Table 3.1, Figure 3.1) and were therefore chosen as the study soils. The extent of NAC sorption by smectites is cation-dependent. Reference clays exchanged with cations of relatively lower hydration energies (e.g., K+) sorb NACS to a greater extent than those exchanged with cations of relatively higher hydration energies (e.g., Mg2+) (Boyd et al., 2001; Johnston et al., 2001, 2002; Sheng et al., 2002; Haderlein and Schwarzenbach, 1993; Weissmahr et al., 1997). We found that K+-exchanged soils sorbed more NACs than Mg2+-exchanged soils (Chapters 1 and 2). In this study we also found that the K+-saturated unfractionated and OM-removed soils sorbed more p-NCB compared to Mg2+—saturated soils (Table 3.2, Figure 3.2). This can be attributed to the lower hydration energy of the K+ ion which facilitates greater interaction between the saturating cation and the solute and larger sorption domains on clay interlayer surfaces (Li et al., 2003; Sheng et al., 2002; Haderlein et al., 1996; Haderlein and Schwarzenbach, 1993; Weissmahr et al., 1997, 1999; Boyd et al., 2001; Johnston et al., 2001, 2002). For each soil, with K+ as the saturating cation, OM-removed soil sorbed more p-NCB than unfractionated soil (Figure 3.2). Sorption of p-NCB by the Webster B and Clarion A horizons doubled after SOM was removed, while sorption increased by about 30% when SOM was removed from the Webster A and Clarion B horizons (Figure 3.2). These data 80 98“ 08v mount—a 8388a Ewan Bantam” 5.820 .0 ”BE—o9. .M 65: SEE“ «£8 .52 ”838:6 .m 81 _ - - whod CmU :32 N30 2 oidzw : R and 26 >28 50 h - - owmd O29 .x. emu—U 8392:er Ana—o .x. 26.x. In 255,—. :8 .3589720 m cows—U .OmU mm cots—U .mAU 60582-20 < 856 .05 m... SEC .16 62682-20 m c2363 .83 mm c2363 .95 66682-20 < .2363 .055 E sees? .35 @9688 we? 20m 5023 88% £8 can :8 2085 £8 ”SEED Ea L830? mo 85:38:30 Homfiosooommzsm ._.m 033. L I _ Intensity l "[1 1" z. “—2 <—.o _ a 1 ll * 2 5‘ WW d - wwamwgwthJ‘u-f 0 5 10 15 o 25 30 Angie 2 their: Figure 3.1. X-ray diffraction spectra for Mg2+-saturated clay-sized fraction isolated by Webster and Clarion (A and B horizons) soils. Graphs represented are (a) Clarion B, (b) Clarion A, (c) Webster B, and (d) Webster A. s-smectite; m/i, mica and/or illite; k, kaolinite; q, quartz. 82 Table 3.2. Freundlich equation Kr and n values for p-nitrocyanobenzene sorption by K“- and Mg2+-exchanged Webster and Clarion (A and B horizons) whole soils and soils from which SOM was removed. Soil K; 11 Webster A K+-whole 0.0528 0.5983 KI-OM removed 0.0922 0.5012 Mgziwhole 0.0067 0.6219 Mg2+-OM removed 0.0007 0.9033 Webster B KI-whole 0.0634 0.5587 K‘C-OM removed 0.1452 0.5106 Mg2+-whole 0.0018 0.8151 Mgz‘zorw removed 0.0009 0.9736 Clarion A K+-whole 0.0222 0.6427 K+-OM removed 0.0736 0.4821 Mg2+-whole 0.0031 0.6434 Mg2*-0M removed 0.0010 0.7079 Clarion B KI-whole 0.0912 0.5326 K+-OM removed 0.1280 0.4661 Mg2+-whole 0.0007 0.9304 Mgz‘t-OM removed 0.0009 0.8185 83 0 0° 33281.3 .0 9 Concentration of NCB sorbed (mg g" 7" 0135 E OLA-K ‘3’ 430‘ CAO-K cu-m 0.25- 3 «on; 3 0120- b 2 3 0.15 5 01101 E 0.06 O _ %c’ §0oo +' e "". 0 o 10 20 so mammoth Concentration of NCB sorbed (mg 9“ Concentration of NCB sorbed (mg g") p a 8 P 5 5 3 p .5 0.7 0.6 . 0.5 r 0.4 1 0.3 - 0.2 -' 0.1 0.0 400. CLB-K CBC-K a 10 Aqueous NCB concentration (mg L") Figure 3.2. Adsorption isotherms for sorption of p-nitrocyanobenzene by K+- and Mg”- saturated Webster and Clarion (A and B horizon) soils. (isotherms marked with different letters are significantly different at p < 0.05) WA/WB — Webster A/ Webster B horizon CLA/CLB - Clarion A/ Clarion B horizon WAO/WBO — Webster A/B horizon, OM removed CLA/CLB — Clarion A/B horizon, OM removed 84 indicate that SOM suppresses sorption of p-NCB by the soil mineral fraction despite SOM also acting simultaneously as an independent sorptive sink. Literature reports decreased sorption of organic solutes to reference minerals when associated with SOM. Liu et al. (2002) observed the sorption of four herbicides (metolachlor, acetochlor,‘ alachlor, and propachlor) by Wyoming montmorillonite (SWy-Z), humic acid (HA) extracted from a Webster clay loam, and clay-HA complexes containing various ratios of clay and SOM. They found that the measured sorption of the herbicides by the clay-HA complexes were less than the sum of sorption by clay and by HA in the same ratios as the complexes. Celis et al. (1997) found that coating Ca-montomorillonite (Ca-SWy-l) with commercial HA and soil-extracted HA decreased the sorption of thiazafluron by the clay- HA complex compared to clay alone. Subsequent removal of the HA coating on the clay- HA complex increased thiazafluron sorption compared to the clay-HA complex. Pusino et al. (1992; 1994) compared the experimental sorption coefficients (Kd values) obtained for the sorption of metolachlor (1992) and triclopyr (1994) by bentonite montmorillonite- HA complexes with the K, values calculated assuming independent sorption of metolachlor by HA and clay. The experimental Kd values were lower than the calculated Kd values. Although these studies indicated that the presence of SOM associated with clays results in decreased sorption of NOCs by the clays, these studies utilized synthetic clay-SOM complexes. Our data indicates that in natural soils, removal of SOM from soil increases sorption of NOCs indicating that in natural soils, as in synthetic systems, SOM obscures clay surfaces for sorption of NOCs. 85 The phenomenon of reduced sorption in the presence of SOM is exemplified by f. values less than 1. We used our sorption data for the K+-saturated soils and applied the Karickhoff equation [1] to calculate fa values (i.e. the fraction of the sorptive surfaces that is available in whole soil) for the four soil horizons. We used K+- and Mgz+-saturated peat, Houghton muck and Brookston loam to determine the SOM contribution to overall solute sorption. This approach requires an estimate of K0'“ for sorption of p-NCB, which we derived previously using three SOM surrogates (Chapter 2). The similarity in fa values calculated using K+- and Mg2+-saturated SOM surrogates (Table 3.3, Table 3.4) indicates that the influence of cation on p—NCB sorption by SOM is minimal. We also applied our alternative equation [2] to estimate fa; this approach utilizes sorption data from K+- and Mg2+-saturated soils and eliminates the need for an independently estimated Kmm values. These fa values (Table 3.3, Table 3.4) obtained for a particular soil using equation [1] did not differ significantly from those obtained using equation [2]. That is, two independent methods for estimating fa (equations [1] and [2]) yielded similar results. Also, the fa values were relatively independent of sorbent material (muck, peat or loam) used as a surrogate for pure SOM (Table 3.3, Table 3.4) when using equation [1]. However, fa values varied across soils and soil horizons (i.e., f, values for Clarion A < Webster B < Wester A < Clarion B) (p < 0.05). The fa values, averaged across both equations and all K+-saturated SOM surrogates, for Clarion B (ca. 0.83 i 0.03) were greater than for Clarion A (ca. 0.36 i 0.05) and those for Webster A (ca. 0.64 i 0.04) were higher than for Webster B (ca. 0.47 i 0.01) (p < 0.05). Despite various amounts of SOM initially present in the soils and different amounts being removed from the soils, f, 86 88382.8 5 8283.8 28:85 .32. v 3 m cots—U v < 88.83 v m .8303 v < 85.0 8.8 828, a 483980 some 8... .39: v 3 8:888:00 9888 288.886 £85388 8: 083 mos—9 u .m 8683 8 m 836 v 3 ASA—mom v 8.32 vege— v 8&3 8388880 8888 28898 3.828886 083 $3.? .8 .m 8683 838 28m :8 88m 836 v 3 0288.882 w 21.885282 v amucoiotaw v anon—$05883. 9.6: 888—528 mos—8, .8 88388380 :8 8088 .< cots—U 28 < .8303 8m .God v 8 038:8“? namfiofiovaz n Emfioiotax u 809.coiom8v— win: 888328 .828.» u 88388880 :8 8888 .m 85.0 28 m .8303 .8... 88.8 S8 :88 :8 A88 8.8 28.8 888 om A88 38 98.8 98 A88 88 28.8 888 2 A88 88 28.8 888 A88 88 A88 38 8 $88 888 28.8 38 88.8 3.8 38.8 68 8 388537.. 88.8 88 A88 88 88.8 8.8 38.8 888 cm 88.8 £8 :88 £8 :88 :8 98.8 $8 2 A88 88 28.8 .88 £88 88 A88 88 8 8.8. 88.828 88.8 888 28.8 88.8 38.8 88 A88 88 m 82:35. 8.8 58 98.8 88 @888 8.8 98.8 :8 8 A88 38 :88 8.8 38.8 8.8 88.8 $8 2 38.8 $8 :88 R8 888 :8 A88 88 8 22:: 88.88.58 88.8 $8 :88 28 A88 28 A88 888 m 8233.5. 888 88.8 :88 R8 88 :8 98.8 88 cm 48.8 38 28.8 28 A88 :8 ~88 $8 2 A 8 . . . . . . . . .3 8 A8 8 N88 :8 8mg 88 838 :8 8888 8 88.8 $8 :88 R8 388 3.8 38.8 38 m 82:88. A mud—5 .88: Bafieta. m .8220 < .8220 m 8.393 < .8883 flirt—89:80 :5 can nouns—.m— AE88 sex 2: 088.888 8 :82 coamxooa 8 £02: :oEwnoE Java wBfiBmmVM .3 8:98 828 magma H: 8633 mrcofiowavm mam: 38:53 @888: m can <8 8.530 98 @588: m 98 <8 .8683 .3 8:98 AmUZv 058305880588 8.« mos—8, _w 2.: .m.m 238,—. 87 80858.8 5 28.838 8.88% .Amod v 3 m 885 V < .2803 v m .8283 v < 885 8.8 82.? d .8880 88 8.... .396 V 3 88.38080 $08.... .88.:8 biosmufim 8.. 083 828, d .m 8.803 8 m .Amcd v 3 ASE—ow v Enam— v.82: v 883 88.8888 808.. 89.85% £88.83... 083 82.3 d .m .3803 8088 £88 :8 .8..— .God v 3 038E028. w Encoiotav. v amutofiotnv— v “meantofiomug. mama: 88.8.8 .83? d 88388080 :8 8088 :8. 8.8.0 88 < .8803 8m 83.0 v 3 02.8.8.2 "amntofiowav. n 23E0508M u .80....toiot8v. mama: 88—8—8 mos—g d 88.888080 :8 888.. .m 88—0 .28 m .8883 8... .88 S8 :88 3.8 38.8 8.8 .88 28 cm .88 £8 :88 8.8 .88 88 .88 .88 2 .88 88 28.8 8.8 .88 8.8 88.8 $8 8. .88 8.8 98.8 28 88.8 2.8 .88 .88 m 3.3.5.? .88 S8 :88 $8 .88 88 .88 888 cm .88 28 28.8 8.8 .88 88 8.8 .88 2 .58. .88 S8 :88 R8 .88 $8 .88 2.8 8. 58.8.... 88.8 888 488 N8 .88 2.8 88.8 .88 m 82.8.8.5. 48.8 $8 :88 8.8 48.8 8.8 .88 :8 cm .88 28 28.8 8.8 .88 8.8 .88 888 2 22:: .88 88 28.8 888 .88 $8 .88 88 8. 88.8888... 88.8 888 28.8 .88 .88 2.8 88.8 88 m 88.8.2.5. .88 8.8 28.8 8.8 .88 8.8 .88 .88 cm Q8 28 28.8 888 .88 5.8 98.8 88 2 . «2.. .88 $8 :88 28 .88 2.8 .88 $8 8. . 88.8 888 4.8.8 .88 .88 2.8 .88 88 w 885.85. A -1— ”Ev 60m: m 8.8.0 A. acts—U m .8303 < 8.883 8:"58280 888.83 55 . E... 8:85am 8:8. sov— ofi 0588.8 8 E8 8% 08m 8 n 2.8 :9 mac... .88 88888- $2 .8 8.8.8 8: cm wag: . 8.880 m o 0.8M mafia 888.80 _ x v. A .8 +~ a . _ . . rt .3 . . w . A2888: m .88 <3 8.8.0 88 A2888: m 88 <3 8.283 3 8.8.8 307C 8880888058-.. .8 82.3 8.. on... .vd 038... 88 relates to the available sites in the context of whole soil. We accounted for the sorption of p-NCB by residual SOM (i.e., SOM remaining after removal of bulk SOM) in each OM- removed soil. Thus, by our analysis, an average of 36 to 83% of the sorptive surfaces are ‘available’ for p-NCB sorption in the unfractionated soil horizons, with more clay surface becoming available for sorption afier SOM is removed. Data analysis revealed that fa values are strongly negatively correlated to ratios of SOM and smectite content of soil. From 83-88% of the difference in f, values among soil horizons could be attributed to differences in ratios of SOM and smectite in the soils (Table 3.5). This is reasonable, given that the SOM and clay are the active sorbents of p- NCB and that, of the minerals present in each soil, smectites have the highest affinities for p-NCB (Chapter 1). The availability of sorptive clay sites does not correlate particularly well with either SOM content, or smectite content alone (Table 3.5). The fa values and %OM were moderately, negatively correlated with 40-50% of the difference in fal values among soil horizons attributed to differences in SOM content. This suggests that the availability of sorptive surfaces in whole soil decreases with an increase in SOM content. This may only operate to a certain extent as Murphy et al. (1990) and Rebhun et al. (1992) suggested that at high concentrations of HA, multiple layering of HA on the mineral surface occurs. The fa values and %smectite were weakly correlated with only about 20% of the difference in f8| values attributed to differences in smectite content in the soil horizons (Table 3.5). The positive correlation suggests that increasing the smectite content of a soil should increase the overall availability of clay mineral sorptive surfaces 89 Table 3.5. Correlation (r value) between fa values for sorption of p-nitrocyanobenzene estimated using Karickhoff equation [1] (using solute sorption by K+-saturated peat, Houghton muck or Brookston loam to determine the Km term) and the alternative equation [2] with percent organic matter (%OM), percent smectite (%smectite) and ratio of organic matter to smectite (%OM/%smectite). Correlations were performed across the Webster and Clarion (A and B horizons) soils (a = 0.05). Equation used and %OM %smectite %OM/%smectite SOM surmate Karickhoff —J)eat ~0.51 0.17 -0.88 Karickhoff — Houghton -O.42 0.24 -O.82 muck Karickhoff — Brookston loam -O.48 0.20 -O.87 Alternative -0.45 0.21 -0.83 9O for a given SOM content. This is because the amount of surface that a given amount of SOM can obscure theoretically would decrease with increasing smectite content. Plotting fa values against %OM/%smectite indicates that the fa values calculated are reasonable since, for each equation and each SOM-surrogate used, the intercepts are approximately equal and all approach unity at 0% SOM (Table 3.6; Figure 3.3). That is, in the absence of SOM the smectite surfaces should be fully available for sorption of p-NCB. The near- unity intercepts also suggest that other types of coatings on smectites that might be envisioned do not significantly reduce availability. While this research clearly indicates that natural SOM renders soil clay surfaces unavailable for sorption of organic solutes, one can only postulate possible mechanisms. First, SOM could cover soil clay basal surfaces and render them unavailable. We know that p-NCB and other NACs (Sheng et al., 2001, 2002; Li et al., 2003), as well as organic cations such as hexadecyltrimethylammonium (Jaynes and Boyd, 1991a), tetramethylammonium (Lee et al., 1989, 1990), and trimethylphenylammonium (Jaynes and Boyd, 1991b), intercalate between the clay layers when sorbed by smectites so SOM may be occupying those interlayer sites. Stevenson ( 1994) points out that although lab studies have reported organic compound sorption in the interlarnellar surfaces of clays, it has not been unequivocally established that such complexes occur in natural soils. However, recovery of amino acids from clay-rich subsoils by acid hydrolysis is incomplete unless preceded by HF pretreatment (Stevenson, 1994) suggesting that small molecules from SOM are able to intercalate clays. If all carbon (C) in SOM were assumed to cover the basal surfaces of soil smectites, then the formula for surface 91 Table 3.6. Linear regression describing the relationship between fa values and ratio of SOM and smectite soil contents. Regressions were performed across the Webster and Clarion (A and B horizons) soils. Intercept is the fa value at which %OM is zero. Equation used Slope 12:33:; [£21.12th 1'2 Karickhoff (peat) -2.73 (0.40) 0.92 (0.06) 0.86-0.98 0.77 Karickhoff (Houghton -2.43 (0.45) 0.91 (0.07) 0.84-0.98 0.68 muck) Karickhoff (Brookston -2.63 (0.41) 0.92 (0.06) 0.86-0.98 0.75 loam) Alternative -2.36 (0.43) 0.91 (0.06) 0.85-0.97 0.69 Standard deviations in parentheses. 92 0.8 0.7 0.6 i d“ 0.5 0.4 0.3 . 0.2 V I I I 0.2 I T fl 1 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 (105 010 0.15 OZ) %OM/ %srrectite (yaw/W 0 9 09 3 0 Marnie 0.8 ={fit-+0.91 03 . . Y 3413 0.7 07‘ 0.6 . I09 .9 as 0.5 1 0.4 ~ 05‘ 0.3 . Q4 . o 0.2 I I r T 03 I ' I I 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 Gm 010 0.15 02) %OM/ %amcfite mm Figure 3.3. Linear regressions of f8 values obtained from data analysis of p- nitrocyanobenzene (p-NCB) sorption data using Karickhoff equation [I] and our alternative equation [2] across 4 specified concentrations (5, 10, 15, 20mg L") versus ratio of SOM to smectite content (%OM/%smectite) across 4 soils (Webster A, Webster B, Clarion A, Clarion B). Sorption of p-NCB to K+-peat, Houghton muck, or Brookston loam was used to obtain the Kom term in Karickhoff equation [1]. 93 coverage used in the alkylammonium method (Lagaly, 1981) predicts that this C would cover 49, 38, 31 and 10% of the smectite surface area in the Clarion A, Webster A, Webster B, and Clarion B horizons, respectively. Note that these values are in modest agreement with the complements of the average fa values (i.e., 1- f,; the fraction of clay surface obscured by SOM) for each horizon (Table 3.3) which are 0.64, 0.36, 0.53, and 0.17, respectively. This agreement may be stricly fortuitous, but would provide a good explanation for the strong correlation between f, and the %OM / %smectite ratios (Table 3.5). However, some authors (Ahlrich, 1972; Celis et al., 1997, 1999) argue that intercalation of natural SOM (at least large SOM molecules) does not occur, in opposition to the aforementioned suggestions. Celis et al. (1998) measured the specific surface area (SSA) (N2 adsorption) of a reference smectite before and after the sorption of humic substances by the smectite. They found that the SSA decreased indicating that the external surfaces were obscured by the humic acid coating. Their X-ray diffraction dam spacings did not change with humic acid coating suggesting that intercalation of humic acids did not occur. Celis et al. (1997), Celis et al. (1999), and Li et al. (2003) found similar results. Alternatively, SOM may bind to edge sites of clay minerals and thereby facilitate aggregate formation, and/or inhibit shrinking and swelling of the smectite interlayers or may partially block the entrance of sorbates into the interlayer region. This is quite reasonable, as edge sites would typically carry positive charges and readily form complexes with carboxylate groups of SOM, thereby creating bridges between clay particles. We propose that not all of the smectite surfaces are obscured by SOM bridges, 94 coatings or aggregation because (a) cation exchange appears to happen readily, which implies that interlayers are accessible to soil solution, and (b) strong sorption of p-NCB occurs even before removal of SOM, and we are confident that most of this sorption occurs on smectite basal surfaces. Further studies would be needed to elucidate the mechanisms behind the obscuration of sorptive surfaces in soil smectites. 95 CONCLUSION Individual effects of SOM and clay are not easily ascertained because in soils, SOM is intimately associated with clay. Accordingly, clay and SOM in soils undoubtedly function in concert more than as separate entities. Our study reveals that the association of SOM with clay obscures sorptive surfaces of soil clays, with availability being dependent on the relative contents of SOM and sorptive clays (e.g., smectites) in the whole soil. 96 REFERENCES Ahlrich, J. 1972. The soil environment. p. 3-43. In C. Goring and J. Hamaker (ed.) Organic chemicals in the soil environment. Vol. 1. Marcel Dekker, New York. Boyd, S.A., G. Sheng, B.J Teppen, and CT Johnston. 2001. Mechanisms for the adsorption of substituted nitrobenzenes by smectite clays. Environ. Sci. Technol. 35:4227-4234. Celis, R., J. Comejo, M. Hermosin, and W. Koskinen. 1998. Sorption of atrazine and simazine by model associations of soil colloids. Soil Sci Soc. Am. J. 62:165-171. Celis, R., L. Cox, M. Hermosin, and J. Comejo. 1997. Sorption of thiazafluron by iron- and humic acid-coated montmorillonite. J. Environ. Qual. 26:472-479. Celis, R., C. Hermosin, L. Cox, and J. Comejo. 1999. Sorption of 2,4- dichlorophenoxyacetic acid by model particles simulating naturally occurring soil colloids. Environ. Sci. Technol. 33: 1200-1206. Chiou. C. 2002. Partition and adsorption of organic contaminants in environmental systems. John Wiley and Sons, New Jersey. Gee, G. and J. Bauder. 1986. Particle-size analysis. p. 383-411. In A. Klute (ed.) Methods of Soil Analysis. Part I — Physical and mineralogical methods. 2nd ed. Agronomy. 9. ASA, Madison, WI. Haderlein, S., and R. Schwarzenbach. 1993. Adsorption of substituted nitrobenzenes and nitrophenols to mineral surfaces. Environ. Sci. Technol. 27:316-326. Haderlein, S.B., K. Weissmahr, and R. Schwarzenbach. 1996. Specific adsorption of nitroaromatic: explosives and pesticides to clay minerals. Environ. Sci. Technol. 30:612- 622. Howard, P. and W. Meylan. 1997. Handbook of physical properties of organic chemicals. Lewis Publishers, New York, NY. 97 Jaynes, W. and SA. Boyd. 1991a. Clay mineral type and organic compound sorption by hexadecyltrimethylammonium-exchanged clays. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 55:43-48. Jaynes, W. and SA. Boyd. 1991b. Hydrophobicity of siloxane surfaces in smectites as revealed by aromatic hydrocarbon adsorption from water. Clays Clay Miner. 39:428-436. Johnston, C., M.F. de Oliveira, B.J. Teppen, G. Sheng, and SA. Boyd. 2001. Spectroscopic study of nitroaromatic-smectite sorption mechanisms. Environ. Sci. Technol. 35:4767-4772. Johnston, C., G. Sheng, B.J. Teppen, S.A. Boyd, and M. F. de Oliveira. 2002. Spectroscopic study of dinitrophenol herbicide sorption on smectite. Environ. Sci. Technol. 36:5067-5074. Karickhoff, S. 1984. Organic Pollutant Sorption in aquatic systems. J. Hydraulic Eng. 110:707-735. Kunze, G., and J. Dixon. 1987. Pretreatment for mineralogical analysis. p. 92-99. In A. Klute (ed.) Methods of Soil Analysis. Part I — Physical and mineralogical methods. 2nd ed. Agronomy. 9. ASA, Madison, WI. Laboski, C.A.M., and J .A. Lamb. 2004. Impact of manure application on soil phosphorus sorption characteristics and subsequent water quality implications. Soil Sci. 169: 440- 448. Lagaly, G. 1981. Characterization of clays of organic compounds. Clay Min. 16:1-21. Laird, D. 2001. Nature of clay-humic complexes in an agricultural soil: II scanning electron microscopy analysis. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 65:1419-1425. Lee, J., M. Mortland, C. Chiou, D. Kile, and SA. Boyd. 1990. Adsorption of benzene, toluene, and xylene by two tetramethylammonium-smectites having different charge densities. Clays Clay Miner. 38: 113-120. Lee, J ., M. Mortland, C. Chiou, D. Kile, and SA. Boyd. 1989. Shape selective adsorption of aromatic molecules from water by tetramethylammonium-smectite. J. Chem. Soc. Faraday Trans. 1., 85: 2953-2962. 98 Li, H., G. Sheng, B. Teppen, C. Johnston, and SA. Boyd. 2003. Sorption and desorption of pesticides by clay minerals and humic acid-clay complexes. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 67:122-131. Liu, W., J. Gan, and S. Yates. 2002. Influence of herbicide structure, clay acidity, and humic acid coating on acetanilide herbicide adsorption on homoionic clays. J. Agric.Food Chem. 50:4003-4008. Murphy, E., J. Zachara, and S. Smith. 1990. Influence of mineral-bound humic substances on the sorption of hydrophobic organic compounds. Environ. Sci. Technol. 24:1507-1516. Nelson, D. and L. Sommers. 1996. Total carbon, organic carbon, and organic matter. p. 961-1010. In D. Sparks (ed.) Methods of Soil Analysis. Part III — Chemical methods. Agronomy. 5. ASA, Madison, WI. Nkedi-Kizza, P, P. Rao, and J. Johnson. 1983. Adsorption of diuron and 2,4,5-T on soil particle-size separates. J. Environ. Qual. 12:195-197. Parker, A., and J .E. Rate. 1998. Environmental interactions of clays — clays and the environment. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany. Pusino, A., W. Liu, and C. Gessa. 1992. Influence of organic matter and its clay complexes on metolachlor adsorption on soil. Pestic. Sci. 36:283-286. Pusino, A., W. Liu, and C. Gessa. 1994. Adsorption of triclopyr on soil and some of its components. J. Agric. Food Chem. 42:1026-1029. Rebhun, M., R. Kalabo, L. Grossman, J. Manka, and C. Rav-Acha. 1992. Sorption of organics on clay and synthetic humic-clay complexes simulating aquifer processes. Wat. Res. 26:79-84. SAS Institute. 1999. SAS 8.1. SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC. 99 Sheng, G., C. Johnston, B. Teppen, and SA. Boyd. 2001. Potential contributions of smectite clays and organic matter to pesticide retention in soils. J. Agric. Food Chem. 49:2899—2907. Sheng, G., C. Johnston, B. Teppen, and SA. Boyd. 2002. Adsorption of dinitrophenol herbicides from water by montmorillonites. Clay Clay Min. 50:25-34. Soil Survey Staff, Natural Resources Conservation Service, United States Department of Agriculture. Soil Series Classification Database [Online]. Available at http://soils.usda.gov/soils/technical/classification/scfile/index.htrnl (verified 10 Feb. 2004) Sparks, D., A. Page, P. Helmke, R. Loeppert, P. Soltanpour, M. Tabatabai, C. Johnston, and M. Sumner. 1996. Methods of soils analysis: Part 3 — Chemical methods. Soil Science Society of America, Madison, WI. Sposito, G. 1984. The surface chemistry of soils. Oxford Univ. Press, New York, NY. Stevenson, F. 1994. Humus chemistry, genesis, composition, reactions. John Wiley and Sons, New York, NY. Stevenson, F. and M. Cole. 1999. Cycles of Soil. Carbon, Nitrogen, Phosphorus, Sulfur, Micronutrients. John Wiley and Sons, New York. Sumner, M. and W. Miller. 1996. Cation exchange capacity and exchange coefficients. p. 1201-1229. In D. Sparks (ed.) Methods of Soil Analysis. Part III — Chemical methods. Agronomy. 5. ASA, Madison, WI. Walker, A., and D. Crawford. 1968. The role of OM in adsorption of the triazine herbicides by soil. P. 91-108. In International Atomic Energy Agency. Isotopes and radiation in SOM studies. International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna. Weissmahr, K., S. Haderlein, and R. Schwarzenbach. 1997. In Situ Spectroscopic investigations of adsorption mechanisms of nitroaromatic compounds at clay minerals. Environ. Sci. Technol. 31:240-247. 100 Weissmahr, K., M. Hildenbrand, R. Schwarzenbach, and S. Haderlein. 1999. Laboratory and field scale evaluation of geochemical controls on groundwater transport of nitroaromatic ammunition residues. Environ. Sci. Technol. 33:2593-2600. Whittig, L and W. Allardice. 1987. X-ray diffraction techniques: Section 12-3.3. p. 338- 342. In A. Klute (ed.) Methods of Soil Analysis. Part I — Physical and mineralogical methods. 2nd ed. Agronomy. 9. ASA, Madison, WI. 101 CHAPTER 4 SORPTION OF NONIONIC ORGANIC COMPOUNDS TO SOILS: THE COMPOUND SPECIFICITY OF AN AVAILABILITY INDEX ABSTRACT Efficacy of the clay mineral fraction of soil for the sorption of nonionic organic compounds (NOCs) may be reduced by its association with soil organic matter (SOM). An understanding of the influence of the clay and SOM association on the fate and transport of NOCs would provide important information that would enhance quantitative predictions of sorption of NOCs by soil compositions. Previously we quantitatively assessed the fractional availability (fa) of soil clay surfaces for sorption of p- nitrocyanobenzene (p-NCB). For p-NCB that sorbs preferably to smectite clays the relative contents of SOM and smectite was the primary determinant of the availability of smectite surfaces in soil. In this study we used three nitroaromatic (NAC) compounds (p- NCB, 2,4-dinitrotoluene (DNT) and 1,4-dinitrobenzene (DNT)) and four loam soils to further evaluate the availability of soil smectite surfaces for sorption. Sorption of each NAC by whole soil and soil from which SOM was removed was determined. Increased NAC sorption was observed with the removal of SOM from whole soils indicating diminished availability of mineral surfaces due to obscuration or blockage by SOM. The fa values differed with NAC suggesting the nature of the NAC may also influence the mechanism driving sorption site availability. We found a strong correlation between the strength of sorption of each NAC to smectites (and the relative sorption capacity of each 102 NAC to SOM and smectites) and the efficacy of SOM to obscure sorption sites in whole soil. 103 INTRODUCTION The ever increasing manufacture and use of synthetic organic chemicals has amplified the need for the development and improvement of models to predict their fate in the environment. Fate and transport models utilize factors representing processes that affect the fate of these chemicals in the environment. A significant fate process for nonionic organic compounds (NOCs) in soils is their sorption by clay minerals and soil organic matter (SOM), the two most important components in soil for NOC sorption. Fate and transport models for fate of NOCs in soils often include terms representing sorption of the NOC to SOM (e.g., Kom, fom) but usually ignore the potential contribution of soil clays to sorption. Soil clays may play an equal or dominant role, compared to SOM, in the immobilization of certain important classes of NOCs, for example, nitroaromatic compounds (NACS) (Sheng et al., 2001). However, the sorptive contributions of SOM and clay components may be interrelated since these materials are often associated in soils. Several studies investigating the sorption of NACs by synthetic humic acid (HA)-clay complexes have shown that the extent of sorption of NOCs to the complex does not equate to the sum of sorption to the individual components assuming independent and additive adsorption behavior (Pusino et al., 1992, 1994; Celis et al., 1997; Liu et al., 2002). It is suggested that SOM may adhere to clay surfaces and form bridges between clay packets, resulting in aggregate formation (Celis et al., 1999; Pusino et al., 1992, 1994; Onken and Traina, 1997), inhibit shrinking and swelling of the smectite interlayers, 104 and/or may partially block the entrance of sorbates into the interlayer regions (Walker and Crawford, 1968). We determined that the association of SOM with clays in soils modifies the efficacy of the clay mineral fraction for the sorption of NOCs in soil (Chapter 2 and 3). Our previous studies revealed that p-nitrocyanobenzene (p-NCB) sorption by Webster and Clarion soils from which SOM was removed was greater than that by whole soil (Chapter 2 and 3) suggesting that the association of SOM with clay minerals obscures sorptive surfaces. In the case of p-NCB, 55 to 71% of the soil clay surfaces were available for sorption by a Webster A soil whose SOM and smectite contents were ca. 4% and 24%, respectively (Chapter 2). The efficacy of SOM to obscure sorptive surfaces (i.e., the fractional availability (f,) of sorptive surfaces) was strongly related to the ratio of SOM to smectite content in soil (Chapter 3). However, the effect of solute characteristics on availability of soil clay surfaces has not been studied. Liu et al. (2002) calculated a parameter ‘a’ that represented the relative change in adsorption capacity of HA-clay complexes, that is, the fraction of the complex that is potentially hindered from sorption by SOM. The ‘a’ values obtained for metolachlor, acetochlor, alachlor and propachlor were -0.73, -0.79, -0.62 and -0.53, respectively suggesting that the presence of HA on the complex differentially decreases sorption depending on the solute used. However, their study used synthetic HA and clay complexes so that translation to whole soil is uncertain. Our objective was to quantify the fractional availability of mineral sorption sites within whole soils for three solutes. 105 EXPERIMENTAL SECTION Two mineral soils, Webster (fine loamy, mixed, mesic Typic Endoaquoll) and Clarion (fine loamy, mixed, mesic Typic Hapludoll) (A and B horizons) (Soil Survey Staff, NRCS), and an organic soil (Pahokee peat; a Euic, hyperthermic Lithic Medisaprist) were air-dried and sieved to remove coarse fragments (>2mm). The mineral soils were fractionated by standard procedures (Kunze & Dixon, 1986). Carbonates (C03) and soil organic matter (SOM) were sequentially removed from each soil horizon. Carbonates were removed using 0.5M sodium acetate buffer acidified to pH 5 at 80°C, followed by the removal of SOM using 30% H202 at 80°C (denoted OM-removed soil). Homoionic soils and soil fractions were prepared by washing the soils with approximately 200 ml portions of 0.1M solution of KCl or MgClz overnight, thereafter centrifuging at 4068g for 30 min and discarding the supernatant. This procedure was repeated four times. The soils were then washed with 200 ml portions of Millipore Milli-Q (Billerica, Massachusetts) deionized H20, thereafter centrifuged and the supernatant tested with AgNO3; the procedure was repeated until a negative Cl' ion test with AgNO; was obtained. The soils were then freeze-dried and stored at room temperature (23 i 1°C) until used. A K‘- saturated reference clay, a montmorillonite, beidellite obtained from Ward’s Natural Science (Rochester, NY), was prepared as outlined above, freeze-dried and stored at room temperature until used. Clay minerals present in the soils, both A and B horizons, were previously identified as mica and/or illite, smectite, and kaolinite (Chapter 1). The Michigan State University (MSU) Soil Testing Laboratory (East Lansing, Michigan) determined the soil gravimetric clay content by the hydrometer method (Gee and Bauder, 106 1986), and the SOM content using dry combustion and a Leco carbon analyzer (St. Joseph, Michigan) (Nelson and Sommers, 1996). Dinitrobenzene (1,4-DNB) was purchased from Sigma Chemical Company (St. Louis, Missouri) with a purity of 98%. Nitrocyanobenzene (p-NCB) and 2,4-dinitrotoluene (2,4- DNT) were purchased from Aldrich Chemical Company (Milwaukee, Wisconsin) with purities of 97% and 97%, respectively. Trinitrobenzene (1,3,5-TNB) was purchased from ChemService Inc. (West Chestnut, PA) with a purity of 99%. All NOCs were used as received. Sorption of NACs by soils, soil fractions and K+-saturated beidellite was measured, in triplicate, using a batch equilibrium technique. This involved adding aqueous solutions of p-NCB (1 to 42 mg L'l), 1,4-DNB (1-42 mg L'l), and 2,4-DNT (1-34 mg L'l) over a range of initial aqueous concentrations (Ci) to a known mass of soil. Solutions of the compounds were prepared in 0.05M KCl or MgClz corresponding to the sorbent saturating cation. Total volumes of 5 ml were pipetted into 7.5 ml borosilicate glass vials containing between 0.2 and 0.4 g of sorbent. The vials were rotated continuously overnight (24 hours) in the dark at room temperature (23 i 1°C) to ensure complete sorption; preliminary studies showed that sorption equilibrium for each solute was reached within 24 hours (data not reported). The liquid and solid phases were separated by centrifugation at 4068g for 30 min. The concentration of NAC in the supernatants (Cc) were determined by a Perkin-Elmer high performance liquid chromatograph (HPLC) (Perkin-Elmer, Norwalk, Connecticut) consisting of a binary LC pump 250 with a series 107 200 autosampler and a uv-visible detector set at the following wavelengths: p-NCB, 254 nm; 1,4-DNB, and 2,4-DNT, 265 nm. A platinum EPS C18 column (Alltech, Illinois) was eluted with an isocratic mixture of methanol (HPLC grade) and Milli-Q deionized water (methanol: water ratio of 55:45 for p-NCB; 65:35 for 1,4-DNB, and 2,4-DNT) with a flow rate of 1.0 ml min". The amount of solute sorbed was calculated as the difference between the initial (C5) and final (Cc) concentration in the supernatant. Compound recoveries in control vials without sorbent were above 95% and not used to adjust the data. Sorption data were described using the Freundlich equation, Q = Kth", where Q is the solute sorbed per unit mass of sorbent (mg g'l), Kf is the F reundlich constant, and n is an exponent describing the shape of the sorption isotherm (Chiou, 2002). Removal of organic matter with H202 may result in the liberation and oxidation of heavy metals. The potential contribution of sesquioxide presence and/or formation afier H202 treatment to solute sorption was determined. K+-saturated ferric hydroxide, F e(OH)3, was prepared as previously outlined (Chapter 1) using FeC13 and KOH. Sorption of p-NCB, 1,4-DNB, and 2,4-DNT by Fe(OH)3 was measured, in duplicate, using a batch equilibrium technique as described earlier. Data Analysis Calculation of fractional availability (fa) of mineral surfaces The fa values were calculated using the equations presented by Karickhoff (1984) and in Chapter 2. The two equations are given below: Qwhole soil = Qmin + Qsom = (fa * Kmin * Ce * fmin) + (Kom * Ce * fom) [1] 108 where Qwhole so“ is the total solute mass sorbed by unit mass of whole soil (mg g'l), Qmin and Qsom are the solute mass sorbed by unit mass of SOM-removed soil and SOM (mg g' 1), respectively, Cc is the aqueous solute equilibrium concentration, and Km and K0'“ represent the sorption coefficients of the solute by the soil fraction from which SOM was removed (mineral) and SOM, respectively, fmin and fom are the fractional mineral fraction and SOM contents of soil, and f,l represents the fractional availability of sorption sites on the clays in whole soil (i.e. the fraction of the sorptive surfaces that are available in unfractionated soil). Using the F reundlich parameters, Kr and n, the Q value (amount NOC sorbed per unit mass of sorbent) was calculated for four selected concentrations that were within the data range (i.e., @ 5, 10, 15, 20 mg L"). Standard deviations for each fa value associated with each concentration were calculated using error propagation procedures (Skoog and West, 1986). For the Karickhoff equation, the K+-saturated system was used and peat was used as the SOM to estimate K0m values for p-NCB, 1,4-DNB, and 2,4-DNT. Within both the Karickhoff and alternative equations, we accounted for the extent of solute sorption by the residual SOM associated with the OM-removed fraction; the residual SOM being the OM remaining afier extraction of bulk SOM using H202. Sensitivity Analysis of f, values Manipulating a modified form of Karickhoffs equation (Chapter 3) we derived a linear equation relating f8 and the SOM and smectite contents: fa = (“Kom / Kmin) X (fom/fmin) + (Kwhole / Kmin * fmin) [3] 109 Plotting fa versus fom/fmin for each soil should give an intercept of 1 when the SOM content is zero (i.e., 100% availability of sorptive surfaces). The sorption coefficients for sorption of a solute by SOM (i.e., Km) and by the smectites in the OM-removed soil (i.e. Kmm) would differ for different solutes. To determine the Km (analogous to Ksmwim) term in equation [3], the extent of sorption of each solute by peat soil and K+-beidellite were described by fitting the data to the Freundlich equation as previously described. The n and Kf sorption parameters were used to determine the sorption per gram of sorbent (peat and K+-beidellite) at an equilibrium concentration of 10 mg L". Correlation coefficients describing the relationship between f, values and the ratio of SOM to smectite content (fem/fsmcme or %OM/%smectite), to SOM content, to smectite content in unfractionated soils, to the sorption distribution coefficient (i.e., Kd) for solute sorption by K+-beidellite, and to the ratio of sorption of solute by SOM and smectite at an equilibrium concentration of 10 mg L'l (Kom/Ksmectite) were obtained. If the calculated f,l values are reasonable, the intercept of a linear regression equation relating f. with fom/fsmectite should tend to unity (i.e., no mineral blockage by SOM) when %OM tends to ZCI'O . Statistical Analysis The sorption coefficient (Kf) and the constant related to the sorption isotherm curvature (n) were estimated using the Freundlich equation, Q=Kch". Comparisons of sorption isotherms were made by comparing the Kf and n values for each soil-solute system using nonlinear regression in SAS (SAS Institute, 1999). A significant difference between 110 isotherms was assigned when there was a significant difference (a = 0.05) between Kf and n or Kf values of compared isotherms (Laboski and Lamb, 2004). 111 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION The Webster and Clarion soils contain significant amounts of smectite clays (13-24% smectite) (Table 4.1) and were therefore chosen as the study soils. The amount of free Fer associated with the Webster and Clarion soils is less than 1%. For p-NCB, 1,4- DNB, and 2,4-DNT sorption by Fer synthesized in the laboratory was negligible (data not reported). We therefore conclude that Fer did not contribute to sorption of p- nitrocyanobenzene (p-NCB), 1,4-dinitrobenzene (1,4-DNB), and 2,4-dinitrotoluene (2,4- DNT) in the soils studied. This is consistent with studies by Haderlein and Schwarzenbach (1993) who reported that NACS do not adsorb significantly to aluminum and iron (hydr)oxides, carbonates or quartz. The sorption isotherms for p-NCB, 1,4-DNB, and 2,4-DNT sorption by each soil were L shaped (Figure 4.1—4.4). For the concentration range used for each solute, the amount sorbed did not plateau for any soil hence the suitability of the Freundlich equation to describe these isotherms (Table 4.2) (Chiou, 2002). Sorption of p-NCB, 1,4-DNB and 2,4-DNT by the Mg2+-saturated soil was equal to or greater than that by the Mg2+- saturated OM-removed soil (Figure 4.1-4.4). Removal of SOM may liberate clay surface sites, but the sorption by the liberated Mg2+-exchanged clay sorption sites would be low due to the large hydrated radius of the Mg2+ cation. Cations with large hydrated radii obscure a greater portion of the clay interlayer sorption domain compared to cations with smaller hydrated radii resulting in lower NAC sorption by Mg2+-saturated clays and soils compared to K+-saturated clays and soils (Li et al., 2003; Sheng et al., 2002; Haderlein et al., 1996; Weissmahr et al., 1997, 1999; Johnston et al., 2002). In addition, sorption 112 ILJf... é... . . .2 C38 oomv mounts.“ ofiooEm Emma 3883mm“ 5.56 .0 Max:268. .M 65: 8:65 some .52 638:6 .mb _ - - Rod 25 :82 >26 2 o.m.§.m E R 82 Re 35m 39 h - - 82 o5 :32 ago a. o£.§.m 2 mm 83 Se 5% Eu 2 - - 22 on? : o.m.§.m 2 a 83 as $230 95 m - -. RS 955 <3 mm. orgasw cm a 23 ”3 $230 ”$3959 .3 .8399: 3.22::— ooatsm _. >20 3:00:53 comma 20.x. In 9:55;. _mem an? .x. 33.9 .x. 3382-20 m 8:5 6% Wm 856 dd €852-20 < 855 .05 8 8E6 .50 6232-20 m bag»? .83 mm 5283 .95 6382.20 < page? .035 2.. 5303 .35 .9308»: mm? 20m £033 Bob £8 was :8 2936 $8 .855 was “8363 no 8338835 _mflaonoofimmsm ._.v 033. 113 $0.5 ‘9 10 g 0 MK 3 g o W s 0*“ v M ”a“ 8 0.31 g Q3. 2 o '5 0.2« g M- 5 s 0.1‘ ‘5 0.2 8 C o 0.0 4 0 no . . 0 10 3 $ 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 WWW(mL) WMW(NU) 1.2 O WA-K O WAG-K 1 .0 ‘ ' WA“ V 9 O o h Concentration of DNT sorbed (mg g") .o 9 N a P c 0 5 10 15 20 25 Aqueous DNT consultation (mg L") Figure 4.1. Isotherms for sorption of p-nitrocyanobenzene (p-NCB), 2,4-dinitrotoluene (DNT), and 1,4-dinitrobenzene (DNB) by K+- and Mg2+-saturated Webster A (WA) and Webster A soil from which SOM was removed (WAO). 114 9 a 9 d d o lo t 440. J a: _I Concentration of NCB sorbed (mg g“) Concentration of DNB sorbed (mg g") p g a 8 1.4‘ 4‘0. 1.2 . Id 0 r I _l_ j P ‘ Concentration of DNT sorbed (mg g' ) a : P o 0 5 10 15 20 25 Aqua. DNT Won (nu L") Figure 4.2. Isotherms for sorption of p-nitrocyanobenzene (NCB), 2,4-dinitrotoluene (DNT), and 1,4-dinitrobenzene (DNB) by K+- and Mg2+-saturated Webster B (WB) and Webster B soil from which SOM was removed (WBO). 115 O O V V MM 9 J a BM 4* 1 p d o ntra Concentration of uca sorbed (mg 9") § § 3 0‘0. 8 L E F Concentration of DNT sorbed (mg g") g 0 5 10 15 m 3 30 Amour: WT Wm (nu L") Figure 4.3. Isotherms for sorption of p-nitrocyanobenzene (NCB), 2,4-dinitrotoluene (DNT), and 1,4-dinitrobenzene (DNB) by K+- and Mg2+-saturated Clarion A (CLA) and Clarion A soil from which SOM was removed (CAO). 116 6‘07 $1.1 g g o QB-K 506- £11. 0 cab-K o v 01.3w 30.5- 310- v caom a a now 030.81 0 z z a 3&3: “5&6 S 5 3502‘ 30.44 g g 30.1 00.2 0 c c 800 80.0 ° 1.0+ .09 ac: on Concentration of ONT 3 rho Figure 4.4. Isotherms for sorption of p-nitrocyanobenzene (p-NCB), 2,4-dinitrotoluene (DNT), and 1,4-dinitrobenzene (DNB) by K+- and Mg2+-saturated Clarion B (CLB) and Clarion B soil from which SOM was removed (CBO). 117 Rmdd mvood nmmnd mmood ooKd flood 3.688 Endgame; Nvood wmood omood omood 3 mod noood o_o:3-+~w2 ooomd omomd _mwmd oommd mvovd mom—d @9688 EO-+M ommmd .2 3d wmmvd _vmmd owmmd moood flosawvm m 83.85 _omnd mmood Sid mmood _oond o_ood 3382 20-+Mw2 Good oo_od oommd owood Novnd mmood 03:3-me Smmd Comd hmmvd owe—d 3.de omnod @2688 29.3 oomvd com _d mde monod vowed ommod o_on>»-+v_ < 83.8.0 woood m Sod _wvwd ooood vmwwd good 3382 20-...ng mogd omood Sid flood movwd Cood flosawwwoz vommd vwmvd omvvd _womd omfid 9.3 .o @0388 EO-+¥ m mwovd m _omd mwmmd moomd owmmd Vmood o_o:3-+v_ 88303 owvwd food envod mmood omowd _oood 3888 EOJNWZ Rood mm _ od whomd momod o y Nod $ood 038$-me nwomd vommd voovd mummd mmomd Good 3888 20-3. < wmmvd monmd ooovd Rood owomd nmmod o_o:>»-+v_ 88303 n- ov— : ov— a ov— oflo—u—Ouchumflm—T‘N ofioufloa—Ohumflm—YVJ QEONflon—OflahochumZufl m—mcm .3588 mm? 20m 533 88m $8 98 £8 20:3 @8088: m 98 1,4-DNB > 2,4-DNT (Table 4.6). This is reasonable since smectites have the highest afiinity for NACS among soil clays (Chapter 1). The fa values for p-NCB, 2,4-DNT and 1,4-DNB were moderately negatively correlated with the %OM contents of the soil horizons with 45-51%, 24-27% and 21-33% of the difi‘erence in f, values between soil horizons attributed to differences in SOM contents, respectively (Table 4.6). The fa values for p-NCB, 2,4-DNT and 1,4-DNB were weakly correlated with the %smectite contents of the soil horizons with 17-21%, 31-33% and 33-43% of the difference in f, values between soil horizons attributed to differences in smectite contents, respectively (Table 4.6). Linear regression analysis of the f, values and the ratios of SOM to smectite contents of the soil horizons indicates that the f, values calculated are reasonable since, for each regression, the intercepts are approximately equal and all approach unity at 0% SOM (Table 4.6). The fa values for the NACS, for each soil horizon, decreased in the order 2,4-DNT > 1,4-DNB > p-NCB, suggesting that the mechanism driving sorption site availability is influenced, in part, by the nature of the solute. Data analysis revealed that the fal values for the Webster A, Webster B and Clarion A soils across solutes were strongly negatively correlated with Kom/Ksmectitc with 68-89% of the differences in fa values between solutes attributed to differences in the relative affinities of the solute for SOM and smectite in these soils (Table 4.7). For each of these soils, the fa values and Qbeidellite (i.e., sorption distribution coefficient for sorption of each 125 Table 4.6. Correlations between f. values for sorption of p—nitrocyanobenzene (NCB), 1,4-dinitrobenzene (DNB) and 2,4-dinitrotoluene (DNT) estimated using Karickhoff equation [1] (using solute sorption by K+-saturated peat to determine the KOlm term) and our alternative equation [2] and percent organic matter (%OM), percent smectite (%smectite) and ratio of organic matter to smectite (%OM/%smectite). Correlations were performed across the Webster and Clarion (A and B horizons) soils (or = 0.5). Equation NOC %OM %smectite °/oOM/°/osmectite Intercept used used Karickhoff DNT -0.27 0.31 -O.64 1.07 (0.08) DNB -0.33 0.33 -O.75 0.92 (0.06) NCB -O.51 0.17 -0.88 0.85 (0.04) Alternative DNT -O.24 0.33 -0.61 1.08 (0.08) DNB -0.21 0.43 -0.66 0.91 (0.06) NCB -O.45 0.21 -0.83 0.85 (0.04) Standard deviations in parentheses 126 $83 8 2: 8m: 82 £33 82: 38.". ES 8.? 3.8 $8 :8 :3 85 N3 86 ~82. 5.2 8N3 Ea 35.5.? $36 2 z: 88: 82 833 OB: £52 mza :8 3.8 $8 NS- 83 :3 3o 85 N83 5.? an: 8.75 usages. Bu <5 In? <3 50 <5 ImB <3 22.5%.: A.» «.5 A.» ”.5 Ba. 3.... gagged. :wdé 2:330 u _...._o .._.__._...._o a 88.22.:6 ..____._._zo\..ao . . 0oz .822. m 8:85.858 3502398 23 20m 3 coma—cm 828 Mo 3568 .«o 2:2 05 93 2:320 28 _S 53950 03862? .50 28 9:8 50M 05 058883 8 Son @88me -+v~ 3 8:98 328 mammsv H: 553:8 boiotaM mama: 33858 82? d 5953 macaw—oboe commmohwom 65323-...»— wcw 20m 3 E598 Crzav oaoflouobWEVWN can AmZQV ocoNnonobEm?vJ AmUZv ocoucoaofiwxoobmcd mo 35:8 no can“ 05 EB 74 we 3 mo :oumbaoocoo Saw—£253 an S :8 AaaOv “won 98 A§=§£Ov oE—oEonfiM 8 3&8 82% mo “55:2 .58 £an 127 NAC to K+-beidellite clay at an equilibrium concentration of 10 mg L'l) were strongly correlated with >90% of the difference in f, values for each soil across NACS attributed to the difference in affinity of each NAC for smectite clay (Figure 4.5, Table 4.6). These results suggest that the greater the extent of sorption of the NAC to swelling clays, the less impact SOM may have on availability of sorptive surfaces in soils. For Clarion B, fa values were negatively correlated with Kem/Ksmwm with 9-11% of difference in fa values for this soil across solutes attributed to differences in the relative affinities of the solute for SOM and smectite clay in this soil. The f, values for Clarion B, across solutes, were correlated to Qbeidellite with 47-49% of the difference attributed to difference in affinity of each NAC for smectite clay. This may be due to the small initial amounts of SOM in this soil which we propose covers only 10% of the clay surface in whole soil (Chapter 3). Thus we suggest the efficacy of SOM to obscure sorptive clay surfaces in this case is probably minimal. Our data suggest that fa values for NACS approach 1 in cases where the NAC is strongly sorbed (presumably by smectite) and the OM/smectite ratio low. For example, f. values for 2,4-DNT sorbed by the Webster B soil approach 1 (Table 4.3, 4.4). Since in theory fa can not be larger than 1, it was of interest to test our method for evaluating fa using a compound that sorbs more strongly to smectite clays than DNT, viz., 1,3,5- trinitrobenzene (1,3,5-TNB) (Haderlein et al., 1996). We measured sorption of 1,3,5- TNB to K+- and Mgztexchanged Webster B whole and OM-removed soils using a batch equilibrium technique (Figure 4.6), and calculated fa values for the selected concentrations 5, 10, 15, and 20 mg L‘l, as previously described. The determined fa 128 values were close to unity ranging from 1.05 i 0.04 to 1.09 i: 0.09 and 1.06 :h 0.04 to 1.10 :t 0.09 using equation [1] and [2], respectively, for data analysis. This observation helps validate our approach for the experimental evaluation of clay mineral surface availability. These results suggest that the relative SOM and smectite contents of the soil horizons as well as the nature of the solute, primarily its adsorption capacity to swelling clays, influence the efficacy of SOM to obscure sorptive surfaces of soil clays and therefore influence the availability of these sites in whole soil for the sorption of NACS. 129 O NCB o DNB a v DNT 0| 1 o" h 1 O ..‘ N L \‘ d I .\ . Concentration of solute sorbed, Q (mg g“) a Q o ‘ I I I I I 0 5 10 15 20 26 30 Aqueous solute concentration, C. (mg L") Figure 4.5. Isotherms for sorption of p-nitrocyanobenzene (NCB), 2,4-dinitrotoluene (DNT), and 1,4-dinitrobenzene (DNB) by K+-beidellite. (isotherms with different letters are statistically different, or = 0.05) 130 a." 3.5 0’ e WB-K . TNB 2’30. 0 WBO-K . f; v WB-Mg - 00 g 2.5 _ V WBO Mg ; O o o a 20 m - Q 0) E o ' .’ 00 “6 15‘ / = s o O a 10- .5 t- s /o 3 0.5 5 . U 0.0 '37- 7 7 7 — ..,_—_____ 7.7__.____77 ‘ 0 5 10 15 20 25 Aqueous TNB concentration (mg L") Figure 4.6. Isotherms for sorption of 1,3,5-trinitrobenzene by IC- and Mg2+-saturated Webster B (WB) and Webster B from which SOM was removed (WBO). 131 REFERENCES Boyd, S.A., G. Sheng, B.J Teppen, and CT Johnston. 2001. Mechanisms for the adsorption of substituted nitrobenzenes by smectite clays. Environ. Sci. Technol. 35:4227-4234. Celis, R., L. Cox, M. Hermosin, and J. Comejo. 1997. Sorption of thiazafluron by iron- and humic acid-coated montmorillonite. J. Environ. Qual. 26:472-479. Celis, R., C. Hermosin, L. Cox, and J. Comejo. 1999. Sorption of 2,4- dichlorophenoxyacetic acid by model particles simulating naturally occurring soil colloids. Environ. Sci. Technol. 33:1200-1206. Chiou. C. 2002. Partition and adsorption of organic contaminants in environmental systems. John Wiley and Sons, New Jersey. Gee, G. and J. Bauder. 1986. Particle-size analysis. p. 383-411. In A. Klute (ed.) Methods of Soil Analysis. Part I — Physical and mineralogical methods. 2nd ed. Agronomy. 9. ASA, Madison, WI. Haderlein, S., and R. Schwarzenbach. 1993. Adsorption of substituted nitrobenzenes and nitrophenols to mineral surfaces. Environ. Sci. Technol. 27:316-326. Haderlein, S.B., K. Weissmahr, and R. Schwarzenbach. 1996. Specific adsorption of nitroaromatic: explosives and pesticides to clay minerals. Environ. Sci. Technol. 30:612- 622. Jaynes, W. and SA. Boyd. 1991a. Clay mineral type and organic compound sorption by hexadecyltrimethylammonium-exchanged clays. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 55:43-48. Jaynes, W. and SA. Boyd. 1991b. Hydrophobicity of siloxane surfaces in smectites as revealed by aromatic hydrocarbon adsorption from water. Clays Clay Miner. 39:428-436. Johnston, C., M.F. de Oliveira, B.J. Teppen, G. Sheng, and SA. Boyd. 2001. Spectroscopic study of nitroaromatic-smectite sorption mechanisms. Environ. Sci. and Technol. 35:4767-4772. 132 Johnston, C., G. Sheng, B. Teppen, S.A. Boyd, and M. F. de Oliveira. 2002. Spectroscopic study of dinitrophenol herbicide sorption on smectite. Environ. Sci. Technol. 36:5067-5074. Karickhoff, S. 1984. Organic Pollutant Sorption in aquatic systems. J. Hydraulic Eng. 110:707-735. Kunze, G., and J. Dixon. 1986. Pretreatment for mineralogical analysis. p. 92-99. In A. Klute (ed.) Methods of Soil Analysis. Part I — Physical and mineralogical methods. 2'”. Agronomy 9. ASA, Madison, WI. Laboski, C.A.M., and J .A. Lamb. 2004. Impact of manure application on soil phosphorus sorption characteristics and subsequent water quality implications. Soil Sci. 169: 440- 448. Lagaly, G. 1981. Characterization of clays by organic compounds. Clay Min. 16:1-21. Lee, J ., M. Mortland, C. Chiou, D. Kile, and SA. Boyd. 1990. Adsorption of benzene, toluene, and xylene by two tetrarnethylammonium-smectites having different charge densities. Clays Clay Miner. 38: 113-120. Lee, J ., M. Mortland, C. Chiou, D. Kile, and SA. Boyd. 1989. Shape selective adsorption of aromatic molecules from water by tetramethylammonium-smectite. J. Chem. Soc. Faraday Trans. 1., 85: 2953-2962. Li, H., G. Sheng, B. Teppen, C. Johnston, and SA. Boyd. 2003. Sorption and desorption of pesticides by clay minerals and humic acid-clay complexes. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 67:122-131. ' Li, H., B.J. Teppen, D. Laird, C. Johnston, and SA. Boyd. 2004. Thermodynamics of nitroaromatic compound adsorption from water by smectite clay. Environ. Sci. Technol. 38:5433-5442. Liu, W., J. Gan, and S. Yates. 2002. Influence of herbicide structure, clay acidity, and humic acid coating on acetanilide herbicide adsorption on homoionic clays. J. Agric.Food Chem. 50:4003-4008. 133 Nelson, D. and L. Sommers. 1996. Total carbon, organic carbon, and organic matter. p. 961-1010. In D. Sparks (ed.) Methods of Soil Analysis. Part III — Chemical methods. Agronomy. 5. ASA, Madison, WI. Onken, B., and S. Traina. 1997. The sorption of pyrene and anthracene to humic acid- mineral complexes: Effect of fractional organic carbon content. J. Environ. Qual. 26:126- 132. Pusino, A., W. Liu, and C. Gessa. 1992. Influence of organic matter and its clay complexes on metolachlor adsorption on soil. Pestic. Sci. 36:283-286. Pusino, A., W. Liu, and C. Gessa. 1994. Adsorption of triclopyr on soil and some of its components. J. Agric. Food Chem. 42: 1026-1029. SAS Institute. 1999. SAS 8.1. SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC. Sheng, G., C. Johnston, B. Teppen, and SA. Boyd. 2001. Potential contributions of smectite clays and organic matter to pesticide retention in soils. J. Agri. Food Chem. 49:2899-2907. Sheng, G., C. Johnston, B. Teppen, and SA. Boyd. 2002. Adsorption of dinitrophenol herbicides from water by montmorillonites. Clay Clay Min. 50:25-34. Skoog, D. and D. West. 1986. Analytical chemistry: an introduction. CBS College Publishing, New York, NY. Soil Survey Staff, Natural Resources Conservation Service, United States Department of Agriculture. Soil Series Classification Database [Online WWW]. Available URL: http://soils.usda.gov/soils/technical/classifimn/scfile/index.html (verified 10 Feb. 2004) Stevenson, F. 1994. Humus chemistry, genesis, composition, reactions. John Wiley and Sons, New York, NY. 134 Walker, A., and D. Crawford. 1968. The role of OM in adsorption of the triazine herbicides by soil. p. 91-108. In International Atomic Energy Agency. Isotopes and radiation in SOM studies. lntemational Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna. Weissmahr, K., S. Haderlein, and R. Schwarzenbach. 1997. In situ spectroscopic investigations of adsorption mechanisms of nitroaromatic compounds at clay minerals. Environ. Sci. Technol. 31 :240-247. Weissmahr, K., S. Haderlein, and R. Schwarzenbach. 1998. Complex formation of soil minerals with nitroaromatic explosives and other pie-acceptors. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 62:369-378. Weissmahr, K., M. Hildenbrand, R. Schwarzenbach, and S. Haderlein. 1999. Laboratory and field scale evaluation of geochemical controls on groundwater transport of nitroaromatic ammunition residues. Environ. Sci. Technol. 33:2593-2600. 135 CONCLUSION The molecular and environmental factors that control the sorption of nitroaromatics (NACS) in the environment must be more accurately understood for the purposes of controlling their mobility and reactivity in the-environment. Soil clays and soil organic matter (SOM) undoubtedly function in concert than as separate entities due to their intimate association in surface soils. Our studies indicate that adsorption of NACS by surface soils is strongly influenced by the nature of the dominant exchangeable cation. In addition, the association of SOM with clay reduces the availability of sorptive surfaces in soils, with availability being dependent on the relative contents of SOM and sorptive clays (and the nature of the clays) in the soil as well as the nature of the solute in the whole soil. We determined that the equation proposed by Karickhoff is best suited to compounds that sorb significantly to clays such as NACs such that the sorption to the clay fraction is large enough to facilitate accurate calculation of f,. This issue was encountered when using diuron as the solute. Fate and transport models that utilize sorption parameters based on the additive effect of reference clay and humic material sorption may deviate from reality and may overestimate the amount of NAC sorbed. 136 llittlirtELr‘ul‘lflmililljlMilli" 1 2