PLACE IN RETURN Box to remove this checkout from your record. 10 AVOID FINES return on or before date due. MAY BE RECALLED with earlier due date if requested. DATE DUE DATE DUE DATE DUE 2/05 c:/ClRC/DataDue.indd—p. 1 5 A COMPUTER-CONTROLLED SPECTROPHOMETER FOR RAPID REACTION RATE MEASUREMENTS By Timothy Gregory Kelly A DISSERTATION Submitted to Michigan State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Department of Chemistry 2004 ABSTRACT A COMPUTER-CONTROLLED SPECTROPHOMETER FOR RAPID REACTION RATE MEASUREMENTS By Timothy Gregory Kelly A computer—controlled transient EPR spectrometer was developed to follow rapid radical reaction rates. The EPR system consists of a commercial 2 MHz magnetic field modulator, a microwave cavity with a an internal modulation loop, a modified Varian Fieldial for external control of the magnetic field and a PDP 8IE computer for data acquisition and instrument control. A flash-lamp source was used to create the radicals to be studied in situ in the EPR cavity. Modifications were made to the electronics of the 2MHz modulator and phase-sensitive detector to increase the SIN ratio of the system. Additionally, high modulation frequency cavity problems led to the development of a second EPR cavity with an internal modulation loop, which was used for low temperature experiments. The flash-lamp trigger was interfaced to the computer to give the computer control over the repetition rate of the flash. Remote optical sensors at the flash lamp provided feedback information to the computer. The technique of Actinometry was used to help characterize the flash lamp, optics and light gathering capability of the EPR cavity by providing a determination of the number of light quanta/pulse available inside of the EPR cavity. The computer-controlled EPR spectrometer is capable of recording a standard EPR spectrum or recording signal intensity as a function of time or a time-resolved spectrum of a radical in a transient state. This system was applied to the study of a Na-THF-Cryptate solution. A solvated electron, e'(so.v) , signal was observed that increased upon intermittent sample illumination and subsequently decayed to a steady state. The kinetics of the decay of the em.” was recorded both as a time-resolved spectrum and as e'(so.v, signal intensity as a function of time at a constant magnetic field. The decay time observed is anomalously long and is explained in terms of the rate of release of the sodium cation from the cryptate complex. To Carol, a.k.a. C. Dors, and Mom and Dad iv ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I wish to express my deepest gratitude to Professor Chris Enke for his help, guidance, encouragement and friendship during the course of my research at Michigan State University. I thank the faculty and staff of the MSU Chemistry Department for the excellent support they offered. I especially thank Professor J. L. Dye for his many interesting discussions, Dr. T. V. Atkinson for his assistance and moral support, and W. Burkhart for his valuable assistance. I thank my wife Carol and my parents for their interest in my studies and their unfailing encouragement and moral support. Finally, I thank the Nuclear Beer Group and the POETS Club for making my life a bit more exciting. TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES ............................................................................................... viii LIST OF FIGURES .............................................................................................. ix CHAPTER 1 Introduction ........................................................................................................... 1 CHAPTER 2 The EPR System .................................................................................................. 9 Introduction .................................................................................................................... 9 Basic Elements ............................................................................................................. 9 The Cavity System ..................................................................................................... 10 The Source System ................................................................................................... 16 The Magnet System ................................................................................................... 17 The Modulation System ....................................................... 18 The MSU 2 MHz EPR Instrument ............................................................................ 20 The Source System ................................................................................................... 21 The Cavity System ..................................................................................................... 22 The Modulation System ............................................................................................. 26 The Fieldial .................................................................................................................. 30 The Flash Lamp .......................................................................................................... 34 The Computer ............................................................................................................. 35 CHAPTER 3 Experimental Techniques ................................................................................... 38 Introduction .................................................................................................................. 38 The EPR Spectrum .................................................................................................... 39 System Tuning ............................................................................................................ 50 Time-Varying Data ..................................................................................................... 51 Time-Resolved Spectra ............................................................................................. 57 CHAPTER 4 Applications ........................................................................................................ 63 Introduction .................................................................................................................. 63 The Sodium-THF Sample ......................................................................................... 65 Discussion ................................................................................................................... 78 Recommendations ..................................................................................................... 82 CHAPTER 5 Characterization of the Flash Lamp .................................................................... 84 Introduction .................................................................................................................. 84 The Flash Lamp .......................................................................................................... 85 Characterization of the Flash Lamp ........................................................................ 91 vi Preparation of the Working Curve ........................................................................... 95 Photolysis Experimental Setup ................................................................................ 96 Photolysis of the Actinometer Solution ................................................................. 100 CHAPTER 6 System Modifications ........................................................................................ 104 Introduction ................................................................................................................ 104 The Fieldial ................................................................................................................ 105 Fieldial Error Signal .................................................................................................. 112 The Flash Lamp ........................................................................................................ 118 The 2 Mhz Modulator ............................................................................................... 118 The Modulator/Demodulator ................................................................................... 124 The Microwave Cavity ............................................................................................. 131 APPENDIX A Program Listings ............................................................................................... 137 BIBLIOGRAPHY ............................................................................................... 159 vii LIST OF TABLES 5-1 Measured Quanta of Light per Pulse Available in the Micro-Now and Varian Cavities ..................................................................................................... 102 viii 2-1 2-2 2-3 34 as 3-6 LIST OF FIGURES Block diagram of a typical EPR spectrometer with 100 kHz magnetic field modulation and phase-sensitive detection .................................................. 11 A rectangular TE102 microwave cavity ....................................................... 13 Block diagram of the Micro-Now 509 2Mhz modulator and phase-sensitive detector ....................................................................................................... 27 Simplified schematic of a Varian Fieldial magnetic field regulator .............. 32 Flow chart for the field-step method employed by EPRSCN ....................... 41 A spectrum of the perylene positive ion in sulfuric acid recorded with 2 MHz field modulation. The spectrum is the result of 1024 averages at field increments of 0.024 G ................................................................................. 45 The narrow-line spectrum of e-(solv) in THF recorded with 100 kHz (a) and 2 MHz (b, c) field modulation ...................................................................... 47 A spectrum of a Varian standard weak pitch sample .................................. 49 Flow chart for the timed data acquisition program TIMEDA ........................ 52 Computer-acquired data testing the response time of the Micro-Now spectrometer. The nominal time constants setting are 10, 1, 0.1 microseconds .............................................................................................. 56 Flow chart for recording a time-resolved spectrum with TIME12 ................ 58 A time-resolved spectrum of e-(solv) .......................................................... 62 A spectrum of Na-THF-Crypt recorded with 2 MHz field modulation .......... 70 The e-(solv) signal as a function of time after a perturbing illumination pulse recorded with 2 MHz modulation and a 1 ms filter time constant ................ 71 A spectrum of Na-THF-Crypt recorded with 100 kHz field modulation ........ 73 A time—resolved spectrum of e-(solv) employing 100 kHz field modulation .74 Spectra extracted from the time-resolved data set in Figure 4-4 showing the spectrum at 0.1 ms after the flash and continuing at 10-second intervals...76 ix 443 5-2 5—3 5-4 5-5 5—6 6-4 6—5 6-6 6-8 6-9 The decay of the e-(solv) signal as a function of time recorded with 100 kHz field modulation and a 20 ms filter time constant ........................................ 77 Circuit diagram showing the flash lamp and associated trigger circuitry ..... 86 The flash-lamp trigger interface to the PDP 8/E computer .......................... 88 The lamp-flashed detector and light integrator ............................................ 90 A digital capacitance meter ......................................................................... 92 The flash-lamp pulse shape with a 10 kV lamp supply voltage. The abscissa is 2 us/div ..................................................................................... 94 A calibration curve of absorbance of 1,10-phenanthroline Fe(|l) complex as a function of Fe(ll) molar concentration ...................................................... 97 Diagram of the focused light beam of the flash lamp .................................. 99 The simplified schematic of the externally controlled Fieldial magnetic field regulator .................................................................................................... 107 Circuit diagram of the modulator enabling external control of the magnetic field ........................................................................................................... 109 The magnetic field as a function of the external sweep voltage at a sweep width of 100 Gauss ................................................................................... 111 The computer interface to the F ieldial internal error signal ....................... 114 Computer-recorded error-signal data as a function of time after a magnetic field increment. (a) A 500 G increment at a 1kG sweep range. (b) A 250 G increment at a 500 G sweep range. (0) A 5 G increment at a 500 G sweep range ......................................................................................................... 1 16 The 2 MHz power amplifier and cavity modulation loop with its associated impedance matching capacitors ............................................................... 117 The Micro-Now internal 2 MHz modulation loop. (a) A side view showing the dimensions of the loop. (b) A top view showing the addition of the magnetic field from the individual wires .................................................... 121 A plot of calculated Hm(p-p) as a function of the power amplifier supply current ....................................................................................................... 123 The circuit diagram of the EPR output amplifier capable of driving a 50-ohm load ........................................................................................................... 126 6-10 The response-time test circuit used to determine the true response time of the EPR spectrometer electronics ............................................................ 127 xi CHAPTER 1 Introduction Electron Paramagnetic Resonance spectroscopy was born in 1945 when Zavoisky [ZA45] and later Cummerow and Halliday [CU46] detected electron spin resonance absorption in solids. The fact that the discovery occurred shortly after World War II is easily understood since a great deal of war-related research was directed toward the development of radar. The development of high power microwave generators, sensitive diode detectors, perfection of narrow—band amplifiers, and lock-in detectors to increase the sensitivity of radar systems advanced the state of the art sufficiently to supply the components necessary for the magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Early EPR spectrometers relied on DC detection of the absorption signal. For a strongly paramagnet sample (Cummerow and Halliday [CU46] used 173 grams of MnSO4-4HzO), a change in resonance absorption results in a variation of incident microwave power at the detector. The detector can be either a bolometer or a diode coupled to a milliammeter. As techniques and instruments improved, sensitivity was limited by the ability to maintain the klystron output power at a constant value. Feher [FE57] explained in a classic paper on EPR sensitivity considerations that the power of the klystron must be kept constant to a greater degree than the smallest change in power detectable due to sample absorptions. The minimum detectable sample size produces a current change of approximately 10'“ amps. Unfortunately, it is not feasible to maintain the klystron power constant to the degree required by such small current variations. To overcome the stringent requirement on controlling the absolute klystron power, modulation and phase detection techniques were introduced. Modulation also helps reduce the contributions to low frequency noise by the diode detector. These sources of noise, which show up as instabilities at the output, are classified as 1If noise. At the time of Feher‘s experiments, the modulation frequencies used were in the audio range, 20 to 6000 Hertz (Hz). Higher modulation frequencies were introduced when it was discovered that the signal- to-noise ration improved proportionally to the square root of the modulation frequency. Piette and Landgraf [Pl60] reported a 16-fold improvement in sensitivity when they changed their modulation frequency from 400 Hz to 100 kHz. They used this increased sensitivity to measure steady-state concentrations of unstable intermediates photolytically produced in situ in the EPR cavity. Rate studies of the decay processes of three radicals were conducted by setting the EPR spectrometer to on resonance line of the radical and then extinguishing the light. Decay curves were plotted on a recorder. The results of the experiment prompted Piette and Landgraf to claim that EPR would be an extremely useful research tool for photochemists who were relying on product analysis, quantum yields, and trapping and flashing techniques to determine mechanisms for free-radical formation and decay in the photolysis of organic compounds. The use of EPR to detect radical reaction intermediates has an obvious advantage over the use of optical methods since optical methods merely ascertain the presence of the intermediates but only in a few cases where the band spectra can be interpreted is I it possible to identify the intermediate as a free radical. EPR, on the other hand, only responds to systems containing unpaired electrons, such as free radicals, and thus presents a highly sensitive was to determine if the reaction intermediate is really a free radical. Quite often, the free radical can be identified by its hyperfine pattern. The main disadvantage of using EPR rather than optical techniques when Piette and Landgraf published their results was the time response of the EPR instrument. The first comprehensive and elegant demonstration of EPR studies of transient radicals was conducted by Fessenden [FE63] in a study of transient alkyl radicals created by continuous irradiation with fast electrons. However, due to the relatively short radical lifetimes involved (about 5 ms), it was not possible to directly observe the decay of the EPR signals when the electron beam was interrupted. In 1964, Fessenden [FE64] reported using a modified 100 kHz field modulation system and a pulsed radiolysis source to determine shortradical lifetimes (7.3 ms for the ethyl radial). The basic change in experimental setup was the use of the 100 kHz output signal normally used for the oscilloscope display as the EPR absorption signal. In 1968, Atkins et al. [AT68a] used Piette’s technique to study radicals created in flash photolysis. Using a Decca X—band spectrometer and 100 kHz modulation, reaction-rate data were taken at 640 ps intervals with a pulse-height analyzer. The analyzer was capable of triggering a xenon flash tube. Decay curves obtained from several flashes could then be averaged. This process, repeated at several magnetic field values, allowed a full time-resolution EPR spectrum to be manually reconstructed from the individual averaged decay curves. Using this technique, Atkins et al. [AY68b] recorded what is believed to be the first high-resolution EPR spectrum of a radical intermediate taken under conditions other than steady state. He recorded the hyperfine spectrum of a benzophenone radical at intervals of 0.1 Gauss. Effort to develop EPR as a true kinetic research tool intensified in the late 60’s. Glarum and Marshall [GL70] modified the receiver/detector electronics of a Varian 100 kHz spectrometer to obtain a net response time of 200 us. Bennet and coworkers [BE67] modified their spectrometer by changing the field modulation frequency to 500 kHz, which resulted in a wide instrumental bandwidth (50 kHz) and a short response time (6.5 us). In later work they used the slightly smaller modulation frequency of 465 kHz [BE69]. In what is believed to be the first use of 2 MHz as a field modulation frequency, Smaller et al. [SM68] inserted a hairpin loop inside a microwave cavity and reported a system response time corresponding to a time constant of 1.6 ps. Subsequently, Atkins et al. [FA‘l70a] modified their Decca X-band spectrometer and modulated the 100 kHz coils with 2 MHz. Due to the high impedance presented by the modulation coils at 2 MHz, the maximum amplitude of the field modulation was limited to one Gauss peak-to-peak. Atkins reported a response time on the order of 1 us. This response time approaches the limit for obtaining useful information from EPR determined by the response time of a microwave cavity. The time required to change the microwave field in the cavity by 1Ie is approximately 20 oscillations [SM77]. For the X-Band cavity with a Q of 5000, the time constant is about 1 us. Atkins et al. were able to use their transient response EPR system to obtain important new magnetic relaxation data pertinent to the mechanism of reactions in solution [A170a, b]. They reported that immediately after the flash, they saw emission from 2-chlorobenzaldehyde in liquid paraffin decaying with a time constant of 14 us into an absorption signal. As a consequence of chemical reaction, the absorption signal then decayed with a half-life of about 2.4 ms. This is believed to be the first well-documented report of Chemically Induced Dynamic Electron Polarization (CIDEP). A commercial 2 MHz field modulation EPR spectrometer built by Micro- Now Instrument Company of Chicago became available in the early 1970’s [H077]. The EPR cavity contained an internal modulation coil similar in design to the modulation loop described by Smaller et al. [SM68]. Thus, a true transient EPR spectrometer was commercially available to the scientific community. J.K.S. Wan used a Micro-Now system for his published CIDEP studies [WA75]. Huisjen and Hyde [HU74] have taken a unique approach toward developing a transient EPR spectrometer. A saturating microwave pulse of short duration (100 ns) was applied to the sample followed immediately by a monitoring low-power microwave, which allowed observation of radicals as soon as 0.2 ps after the pumping microwave pulse. The system is used with magnetic field modulation, thereby eliminating side bands caused by the field modulation frequency. To decrease 1ft noise, the pumping pulse is repeated at 6-50 kHz. The range of lifetimes accessible with this instrument is 250-02 us. With the availability of instrumentation, which allowed data to be taken 0.2 us after the perturbation pulse, the problem of handling the potentially tremendous volume of data needed to be considered. Researchers who used the original technique of Piette and Landgraf[P160] (which was to hold the magnetic field constant and record kinetic data as a function of time) acquired data with devices such as a standard recorder for long lived radicals [P160], 3 storage oscilloscope [GL70], and transient recorders that eventually sent their output to an X-Y recorder [F167, Wl68, AT68a]. Atkins et al. [AT68b] used a ‘Biomac 500’ pulse-height analyzer to record and average data at several magnetic field values. After the experiment, they had to manually reconstruct a time-resolved spectrum of the radical. The volume of data that could be acquired using the new, fast instruments posed a serious problem for data storage and analysis. In an effort to eliminate the need for manually reconstruction a time- resolved spectrum from multiple decay curves, Bennett et al. [BE67] designed a six channel sampler system which was triggered by the flash lamp and which acquired data at fixed time intervals along the decay curve. The output of each channel was connected to a recorder. The magnetic field was linearly varied and data were recorded during the magnetic field sweep. At the end of the field sweep, six spectra had been constructed, each spectrum corresponding to one of six time intervals after the flash. Holbrook et al. [H072] built a 16-channel sampler that wrote data on a 16-channel tape recorder. The spectra were later plotted on an X-Y recorder. Again, each channel corresponded to a spectrum at a specific time after the flash. Another approach for obtaining a spectrum of a transient radical is to add auxiliary field sweep coils [$068, H168, H873] and synchronize the field sweep with both a signal-averaging device and a pulsed excitation source. There are several problems, however, associated with this technique [BO37] including nonlinearity of sweep fields, limited sweep range and decreased field homogeneity as sweep amplitudes are increased. There is also a problem using a CAT (Computer of Average Transients) to store the entire spectrum since most signal averaging devices have limited memory, typically 4096 words. For data acquisition and analysis both small [KL72, GR73] and large [6072, SE73] computers have been used to greatly simplify data analysis compared to previous methods. However, to allow optimization of experimental conditions and to eliminate problems associated with other techniques, interactive control between the computer and spectrometer is necessary. In 1975, Goldberg and coworkers [6075] designed a computer-controlled EPR spectrometer, which had the magnetic field under computer control. The software for their system, enabled data to be acquired either in field-step or field- sweep mode. In the field-step mode, the computer increments the magnetic field and waits for it to stabilize before accumulating data, while in the field-sweep mode, the field is continually changed while data are taken. Results of several studies using this computerized system have been published by Goldberg [GO76a, GO76b, 60760, 0078]. The purpose of this thesis is to describe the computer interface and the necessary modifications, which were made to an EPR system to create a computer-controlled EPR spectrometer for rapid reaction rate measurements. Chapter 2 contains an introductory discussion which first familiarizes the reader with EPR instrumentation and then describes the interfacing, modifications, and programming that are necessary to construct a functioning computer-controlled spectrometer. This chapter includes only brief statements of problems and modifications made to the purchased Micro-Now 2 MHz spectrometer. The detailed circuit descriptions are left until Chapter 6 for readers who desire a more complete knowledge of the electronics. The various modes of operation of the computer-controlled spectrometer are described in Chapter 3 and Chapter 4 discusses applications of the techniques to chemical problems. The properties of the flash lamp and design of its computer interface for kinetic studies are discussed and characterized in Chapter 5. Finally, the appendix to this thesis contains listings of the computer programs that were essential for completion of this project. CHAPTER 2 The EPR System Introduction In this chapter, a description of a standard EPR spectrometer is presented. The reader will be familiarized with the components and their functions in a typical instrument. Then, modifications necessary to change the modulation frequency to 2 MHz and allow computer control and data acquisition are described. A detailed discussion of the system modifications is presented in Chapter 6. Basic Elements All absorption spectrometers, regardless of frequency range, have four basic components: 1. Source of electromagnetic radiation 2. Dispersing element 3. Absorption cell containing the sample to be studied 4. Detector Various spectroscopy techniques differ in the properties of these four elements. The main characteristic of the radiation source is its frequency, e.g. UV, visible, infrared and microwave. EPR instruments, which use microwave sources, operate at one of two common frequencies: nominally 35 GHz (referred to as 0- band) or 10 GHz (referred to as X-band). The wavelengths for Q and X bands are 0.85 and 3.0 cm, respectively. The dispersive element in EPR is the magnetic field. However, its action is much different than the dispersive element in other forms of spectroscopy because it disperses the response of the sample (Zeeman splitting) instead of the frequency of the source. The absorption cell is the microwave cavity, which contains the sample. An EPR detector is usually a silicon diode biased to operate in its linear region with a voltage output proportional to the square root of the incident power [HY63]. Figure 2-1 is a block diagram of a typical 100 kHz EPR spectrometer [WE72a]. The block diagram is divided into five functional groups. The region labeled source contains all the components, which control and measure the microwave frequency and intensity. The cavity system is composed of the resonant microwave cavity that holds the sample and the components that direct the microwave to and from the cavity. The modulation and detection region contains the components that encode and phase detect the absorption signal. The magnet system provides the homogeneous, linearly variable magnetic field that surrounds the sample. Each of these functional blocks will be discussed briefly starting with what is generally considered the central component of the instrument — the cavity system. The Cavity System The heart of an EPR spectrometer is the resonant cavity containing the sample. The cavity (1) establishes the spectrometer frequency by its internal dimensions, (2) contributes substantially to the sensitivity, and (3) may be an important factor in resolution [AL68c]. A cavity can be characterized by the 10 £28825 o>£80mlommnq use cows—ace: Eva 23:38 5.3 2: .23 8880.589. Maw 3390 a .3 ESch 0305 ”TN onE «I!rtittremtwinmrmm~Mflmmmqmartttrtirw l -1 13".“ '001331! G _ lg le >h~>¢o turn». hazocx / 2% fl cohoupua cupuxusc: nzmuum llmmw. . _ 4% 322.3; 32.3.: 22:23. :22; 3823 E :32. 3.53 9694 —08~h¢8nxcuh “tau. 11 following parameters [AL680]: 1. Mode or standing wave pattern of the microwaves 2. Resonant wavelength 3. Selectivity factor (commonly called 0 factor) Electromagnetic waves traveling in free space or in an ideal waveguide propagate with the magnetic (H) and electric (E) fields in phase. In a resonant cavity however, the H and E fields form standing wave patterns with the H and E nodes separated. This allows a sample to be placed in a region where the magnetic field is at maximum amplitude while encountering a minimum in the electric field strength. Cavities are classified by the internal field patterns that result from the separated E and H fields as either transverse electric rnode, TE.,m.n, where the electric field has no Z component or transverse magnetic mode, TM.,m.n, where the magnetic field has no Z component. The subscripts l, m, n, refer to the number of half-period variations of the E and H fields along the X, Y, 2, dimensions of the cavity. Figure 2-2 shows the X, Y, Z axes as defined for a TE102 cavity. As one can see from the internal field patterns, a sample would be in an area of maximum H field and a minimum E field if inserted along the X axis at the center of the Z axis. TEm is the mode of the cavity used in this research. This mode cavity is commonly used because its width is not important as long as it is less than one half-wavelength. This allows the construction of narrow cavities that fit very easily between the pole tips of all magnets. The field patterns in the cavity allow one to out large holes in the sides of the cavity, eg. to let in light, without affecting the quality of the cavity. The narrow cavity shape also provides flat sidewalls on which to mount field modulation coils. The 12 Figure 2-2: A rectangular TE102 microwave cavity. 13 fundamental resonant frequency of a cavity is the frequency at which one half- wavelength of the microwave corresponds to a cavity dimension.- The internal dimensions of a TEm cavity at a resonant frequency of 10 GHz are 1.5x<1.5x3.0 cm. The selectivity factor or quality factor, Q, of a cavity is usually defined by Equation 2-1 [P067a]. _ 27r(energy stored) (energy dissipated per cycle) (2-1) In an ideal unloaded cavity (loss due only to ohmic losses in the cavity walls), the “energy stored” can be expressed as an integral of the power density over the volume of the cavity. The “energy dissipated” is power released as heat when the current induced in the walls of the cavity by the varying magnetic field flows through the resistance in the cavity walls. Cavity Q can be approximated by Equation 2-2 [AL678] z Volume of the cavity (2_2) 0 _ 6 x (surface area of the cavity) where 6 is the skin depth (depth at which the current density has decreased to 1le of the surface value) of the current at the cavity resonant frequency. For a given cavity mode, Le. a fixed cavity volume, cavity 0 depends inversely on the skin depth which in turn inversely depends on the conductance of the surface metal. Therefore, to minimize resistive losses and maximize Q, the internal surfaces of the cavity are usually plated with a highly conductive metal such as silver or gold. 14 In early EPR literature, expressions were developed showing the relationship of various parameters to the signal. Signal power was expressed as [AL67a] _ P0 (47:15] Q0) 2 S 16 (2'3) where P0 is the incident microwave power, 00 is the unloaded cavity 0, x” is the imaginary part of the susceptibility, and n is the filling factor. It should be noted from this equation that signal power is proportional to the square of the unloaded cavity 0, but only proportional to the first power of the incident microwave source power. A figure of merit for cavity 0 in a Tsz cavity is about 7000. The microwave energy traveling through the waveguide is coupled to the cavity through a small hole called an iris. This hole provides the function of matching the impedance of the cavity to the impedance of the waveguide. Since the reflected signal observed at the detector should be due only to the sample in the cavity, reflected power due to a mismatch of waveguide and cavity impedances must be avoided. When the impedances of the waveguide and cavity are matched, this source of reflected power is at a minimum. An adjustment screw in the iris permits optimum impedance matching. The final component of the cavity system is the hybrid Tee. This is a “magic” device, which will not permit microwave power to pass in a straight line from one arm of the Tee to the other. The power coming from the source is equally divided between the cavity arm and an arm that contains a terminating load and a slide screw tuner. If all the power is absorbed in the two arms of the Tee, no power reaches the detector arm. Anything done in either arm to change 15 the terminating impedance, eg. a microwave-absorbing sample, will cause a reflected signal to reach the detector. The slide screw tuner in the terminating arm of the Tee is used to reflect the proper phase and amount of microwave to destructively interfere with any unwanted reflections arising from discontinuities in the waveguide or imperfect matching of microwave components. The Source System The predominant source of microwave power used in EPR is a klystron. A klystron is a vacuum tube, which produces microwave radiation by causing electrons to oscillate in a resonant cavity by applying an accelerating and a reflecting voltage. The microwave radiation is tunable over a small frequency range by varying the applied reflector voltage. A coarse adjustment of the frequency can be made by physically changing the resonator cavity dimensions using a mechanical tuning stub on the klystron. To prevent the frequency of the klystron from drifting, a small modulation (typically 10 kHz), which is placed on the reflector voltage, results in a modulated microwave frequency at the cavity. The reflected signal from the cavity due to a mismatch of the microwave frequency and the cavity resonant frequency is phase detected and used as an error voltage to the klystron power supply to “lock” the klystron frequency to the resonant frequency of the cavity. This frequency “locking" process describes the function of the AFC circuit. An isolator is a device similar to the hybrid Tee in that it will only pass microwave radiation in one direction. It is used in the EPR source system to 16 prevent reflected radiation from the cavity from interfering with the operation of the klystron. The wavemeter is a variable length resonant cavity, which can be adjusted to an integral number of half-wavelengths by a micrometer. It is used in a typical EPR instrument as a measurement device to determine the actual frequency of the microwave being used. The amount of microwave power reaching the sample cavity is controlled by a variable attenuator. The attenuator is a resistive element, such as a nickel- chromium film on glass that absorbs energy when inserted into the microwave through an opening in the waveguide. The depth of penetration, and therefore the amount of energy absorbed, is controlled by a calibrated dial on the front panel of the instrument. The Magnet System The large, constant magnetic field (Ho) used to produce the resonant absorption is provided by an electromagnet and a highly regulated power supply. Assuming a g-factor of 2 (g for a free electron is 2.00229), at the X-band microwave frequency; this field must be approximately 3400 Gauss. At Q-band frequencies, it must be about 12,500 Gauss. The field must be homogeneous over the entire sample volume, and should be very stable. Total field variations should be less than 10 mG over the entire sample volume [P067b]. Modern magnet systems utilize a Hall-effect device in the field as a magnetic field-to— voltage transducer. An error signal applied to the magnet power supply is 17 obtained by comparing the voltage signal from the Hall probe to a reference signal. A scanning system is created by linearly varying the reference voltage and allowing the resulting error signal to change the magnet current. Therefore, the actual magnetic field at the sample tracks the reference voltage. The Modulation System In general, when making a measurement requiring high sensitivity in a noisy environment, modulation techniques are used. A physical property is modulated, amplified by a narrow band amplifier tuned to the modulation frequency, and phase detected. Only noise near the modulation frequency can interfere with the measured signal. By looking at the resonance equation for EPR, h v = ng (2-4) one can see two variables that might be modulated, microwave frequency (v) or magnetic field (H). James Hyde [HY63] has shown that due to the narrow bandwidth of microwave components, it is impractical to modulate the absorption resonance by modulating the microwave frequency. Therefore, spectrometers keep the microwave constant, “locked” to the resonant frequency of the cavity by the AFC, and modulate instead the applied magnetic field. The magnet field is modulated by placing a pair of small Helmholz coils on the sides of the cavity and applying a modulation signal to the coils. The most common modulation frequency used today is 100 kHz. 18 Detection of the signal is accomplished through the use of a silicon diode that rectifies the reflected microwave signal. Because of the high frequency of microwaves, capacitance in the detector and cables filter out the microwave carrier so that the only signal passed to the detector electronics is the 100 kHz modulation. This 100 kHz is amplified by a narrow band amplifier, phase detected, filtered and displayed on an X-Y recorder with the X axis of the recorder synchronized to the magnetic field sweep. The transient response which one sees from an EPR instrument depends upon the modulation frequency, the bandwidth of the narrow band amplifier, the amount of electronic filtering used to remove noise and the response of the recording mechanism. A discussion of an EPR spectrometer would not be complete without considering the parameters affecting the sensitivity of the instrument. The minimum detectable number of paramagnetic centers, Nmin, in an EPR cavity at a signal-to—noise (SIN) of unity is [WE72b]. 23FckTsr (Fdeb)r/2 Zag fl s(s+1)H,Qu' Po Nmm= <2-5) Here Vc is the volume of the cavity, k is Boltzmann’s constant, T, is the temperature of the sample, I' is half of the half-width of the absorption line in Gauss, Hr is the magnetic field at resonance, Qu’ is the unloaded cavity Q, Ta is the temperature of the detector, b is the bandwidth of the entire detector and amplifying system, P0 is the microwave power incident on the cavity, and F is a noise figure (>1) used to describe noise other than thermal noise. Ideally, F would be 1. The terms of particular importance for this research are the 19 bandwidth of the system b, the cavity 0, and the noise figure F. Assuming a resonance line quarter-width of 1 Gauss, room temperature and a TE102 cavity, Nmin = 1011 spins. It is generally accepted that the three components, which limit the SIN, are the klystron, the detector diode and microphonics (mechanical vibrations or spurious electrical transients) [AL68b]. Any of these three may be the noise- limiting component under certain experimental conditions. For example, at low power levels, 1If crystal detector noise dominates while at high power levels, klystron noise predominates. The MSU 2 MHz EPR Instrument Since the first reported use of 2 MHz field modulation by Smaller et al. in 1968 [SM68], researchers who had no desire to design and develop the instrumentation for 2 MHz EPR have been interested in applying this new kinetic tool to their particular research. In the early 1970’s, a small company named Micro-Now instruments started marketing a Model 509 2 MHz EPR spectrometer. The sales brochure advertises, “The Model 509 is an EPR spectrometer which uses a 2 MHz field modulation frequency, which makes it ideal for pulsed type systems such as those used in flash photolysis and pulse radiolysis. Its very fast recovery time permits the Model 509 to be used for the study of paramagnetic species which have half lives as short as one microsecond” [MNOW]. The Model 509 is made up of three subassemblies: 1. 509-1 microwave source system 20 2. 509-2 microwave cavity system 3. 509—3 2 MHz modulation and detection system. It is sold without magnet or power supply, and thus it is meant be used with an existing EPR spectrometer. Since many applications for a fast-response EPR spectrometer existed within the MSU chemistry department, a system was purchased. The commercial EPR spectrometer designated to receive the Micro-Now modification was a Varian 4502 Q-band spectrometer. Since the microwave plumbing for 0- band is not compatible with X-band, an entire 509 system was ordered. The resultant instrument, the MSU. 2MHz EPR spectrometer (Micro-Now Serial Number 5) will be discussed briefly. The Source System The Model 509-1 consists of the complete source system described above minus the klystron power supply and AFC. These functions are supplied by the Varian host spectrometer. The microwave source is a V153 klystron with a power output of 300 mW at a maximum power supply voltage of 350 volts. At this voltage, the klystron must be water-cooled. Fortunately, the klystron could be safely operated at the stated maximum 350-volt limit since that value corresponded to the absolute minimum output of the klystron power supply in the host Varian console. Varian incorporates a higher voltage, quieter klystron that the V153 in their systems. Varian literature states that the V153 was initially designed for radar applications 21 and has molded leads and base to allow operation at high altitudes without pressurization. The NMR-EPR service group here at MSU had several V153 klystrons that came as military surplus. It is unfortunate that Micro-Now saw fit to skimp on a component that is generally accepted as a SIN limiting component; but to manufacture an inexpensive spectrometer, priced so that researchers would be willing to gamble on it, manufacturers cut corners wherever possible. This philosophy bodes ill for the MSU 2 MHz EPR. The slide screw tuner used to null unwanted microwave reflections arriving at the detector was replaced in the Micro-Now instrument by an RF phase shifter- bias attenuator to fulfill the same function. It was found that the phase shifter was not capable of shifting the phase quite far enough for proper nulling of the unwanted reflected signal fro the cavity arm. However, no modifications were made to this unit. The Cavity System The Micro-Now 509-2 EPR cavity is an X-band, rectangular, TE102 cavity designed specifically for 2 MHz field modulation. The cavity is machined from a solid block of brass and then is silver plated to decrease the surface electrical resistance. This procedure is necessary since the cavity 0 is inversely dependent on the surface resistance. Only the resistance of the internal surface of the cavity is important for cavity 0 because high frequency electric current is carried in the skin or surface of a conductor. The “skin depth” for silver (i.e. the depth at which the current has decreased to 1Ie of the surface current) is 0.64 22 pm at 10 GHz [AM72]. Since better than 99.9% of the current flows within 5 skin depths of the surface, only the resistance of the top 3.2 pm is important. The cavity has a small rectangular opening on one side to allow in situ irradiation of a sample. This opening was quite small and proved to be difficult to use with a flash lamp. This light intensity problem is discussed in detail in Chapter 5. The 2 MHz modulation coil is similar in design to one published by Smaller [SM68]. The coil was a single loop of wire shaped like a hairpin positioned inside the EPR cavity. At high modulation frequencies, an internal modulation coil is preferable because it would be difficult to pass a high frequency magnetic field through metal. The oscillating field induces eddy currents in metallic cavity walls such that the direction of the induced electron flow produces a reverse magnetic field in opposition to the original flux [$174]. The magnetic field decreases to 1le of its incident value in one skin depth. The skin depth in silver at 2 MHz is 45 um [AM72]. To pass an appreciable amount of the magnet field modulation, the walls must be one skin depth or less thick at the modulation frequency. However, to keep the microwave radiation inside the cavity, the walls must be five skin depths thick at the microwave frequency. This corresponds to 3.2 pm at 10 GHz. At a modulation frequency of 2 MHz, the dimension of the walls is critical and becomes too thin to properly support the modulation coils. Therefore, internal modulation coils are commonly used. The Micro-Now cavity had several drawbacks. First, the sample irradiation opening in the cavity wall was smaller than it should have been, unduly restricting the amount of light available in the EPR cavity. Second, the 23 magnetic resonance peak drifted in the Micro-Now cavity. This effect was noticed when a quartz dewar, necessary for low temperature studies, was inserted in the cavity. The problem was thought to be caused by the bottom of the modulation coil loop. The coil is bent to go around the quartz dewar, but the arc of the bend is not quite large enough. When the dewar is inserted in the cavity, the coil is pushed out into the microwave field destroying the cavity Q by drastically increasing the losses in the cavity. The AFC does not work well on a cavity with low cavity 0 because a low Q cavity will support a wide range of frequencies. Therefore, the AFC modulation will not modulate the cavity out of resonance and will not receive an error signal back from the system and the klystron is free to drift. The shape of the bottom bend in the modulation coil is undesirable because it will produce a component of magnetic field perpendicular to the desired magnetic field. Several modification ideas were tried to create a more stable cavity. Unfortunately time did not permit starting from scratch to build a new cavity so the modifications were made to an existing Varian TE102 cavity, which then could be operated at 2 MHz without the drifting problem inherent in the Micro-Now cavity. For room temperature work, the Micro-Now cavity was satisfactory. The cavity 0 measured by Professor J. Cowen [COWN] was about 4000, a respectable value for Q. It was because of this moderately high 0 that the drifting problem was not seen until low temperature experiments were attempted. Therefore, for much of the work done and spectra recorded, the Micro-Now 24 cavity was used. The maximum modulation amplitude was measured at 3 Gauss peak-to-peak. A Varian cavity (0 about 7000) was modified for the low temperature studies. Several attempts were made to introduce a 2 MHz field modulation into the cavity but with the restriction that the Varian cavity coil not be permanently altered. The selected method of introducing modulation into the cavity was to install a quartz dewar which had a single strand of 28 gauge magnet wire glued down its front and back. This piece of wire is used as the modulation loop. The resulting cavity was better than the Micro-Now cavity in two ways. First, the resonance did not drift during low temperature work and second, the sample irradiation opening was larger than that of the Micro-Now cavity allowing a greater fraction of the flash lamp output to be collected in the cavity. The major drawback is that not as much field modulation can be produced in the cavity (less than 1 Gauss peak-to-peak). This is not a problem for narrow resonance lines studied in this research because a modulation amplitude greater than 0.2 times the peak width will distort the line shape [WE72c]. The optimum SIN occurs with a modulation amplitude 1.6 to 3.5 times the peak width, depending on the line shape [WA61, SM64]. An unexpected benefit of installing a quartz dewar in the cavity was an increase in the SIN. The presence of a low-loss dielectric, such as quartz, in the cavity has the effect of decreasing the apparent cavity size and increasing the apparent fill factor, n, of the sample [AL68e]. According to Equation 2-3 above, this will increase the signal power. For example, Depireqx [AL68t] observed that 25 signal amplitudes were increased by a factor of 2 to 3 when the samples were encased in quartz tubing. The Modulation System A block diagram of the modulator/demodulator electronics is show in Figure 2-3. This unit contains the 2 MHz crystal oscillator/preamplifier used to drive the power amplifier connected to the modulation coil, plus all of the electronics to amplify and phase detected the resulting signal. The signal preamp has a selectable gain of 25 or 35 dB and is battery operated for low noise. The preamp output is used both as the klystron AFC signal and also as the EPR signal to be amplified and phase detected. The signal is routed through a 0-41 dB attenuator to a detector/video amplifier circuit built around an integrated circuit balanced demodulator detector (Motorola part number MC15961). The final output passes through an offset and time-constant-select amplifier. The range of time constant selections is 0.001 — 100 um plus a position marked NONE. The modulator/demodulator system had several problems that led to a need for eventually replacing all of the electronics in the system except for the 2 MHz crystal oscillator and phase shifter. The details of the modification will be discussed in Chapter 6 on system modifications. After the system had been taken apart and set up a few times, the EPR would not even produce a spectrum of strong pitch, which is one of the strongest samples ever used in EPR. The problem was tracked to the lack of 2 MHz 26 .8883. 03:88-33.“— 23 83338 ~52 m cow 3oZ.o.§2 05 me 863% 5.005 ”Wm PBwE 59:0 59: 3%: Cowman. Mam . 82> can}. . o . 82m .83 0 0:3 8:80 8:2:on o . . 23 . . s w J , 8:580 8535. «Em 82m 835 83 38 Base 82> as 8:20.32 83:80 _ FIIL _ L, — Hasrl+|L .8880 036 m «:9: J 38255 W. E 5:18 3m 0 h - uoagaofixw lei ’ - 0130 5930 3:6me 0.? v , 853:2 - W . uoaom £2 N I 9 l _ 8535-5 E 27 modulation in the cavity. The Micro-Now 2 MHz power amplifier required a specific cable to be used between the power amplifier and the cavity for the modulation to work. Also, disconnecting the cable while the power was on would cause the output transistor in the power amplifier to burn out. The basic philosophy used in the design of the power amplifier was at fault. The modulation loop in the cavity is a zero-ohm load at the end of a 50-ohm cable. This impedance mismatch was probably causing a total reflection of the 2 MHz modulation at the end of the 50 ohm cable. To eliminate this problem, the 2 MHz power amplifier was redesigned such that it would not self-destruct if the cable was disconnected while the power was on. To terminate the cable properly, the cavity modulation loop was used as the inductor in the tuned LC circuit with an input impedance of 50 ohms and thus the coaxial cable was terminated at its characteristic impedance. The measured 0 of the LC circuit containing the modulation loop was 20, giving a 20-fold increase in the circulation current in the modulation loop over the current from the power amplifier. The circuit for the power amplifier and tuned LC circuit is show in Figure 6-6. A tuned LC circuit was also built for the Varian cavity, again using the modulation loop as the inductor. The measured 0 for the LC circuit including the modulation loop for the Varian cavity was 2. This low Q was probably the result of capacitive coupling between the wire canying the 2 MHz current into the cavity and the metal neck of the cavity. To increase the Q of the tuned circuit, it would be necessary to decrease the capacitive coupling between the wire and cavity which could be accomplished by drilling holes in the top of the cavity to pass the wires through as little metal as possible. Without drilling holes in the cavity, a Q of 2 was the 28 best that could be achieved. The resulting maximum peak-to-peak modulation amplitude, Hm(W, for the Micro-Now cavity was 3 Gauss. For the modified Varian cavity, the maximum HM”) was 0.5 Gauss. The EPR output of the Micro-Now spectrometer drives a 20-foot length of 50-ohm coaxial cable terminated at the computer ADC with an input impedance of 1 M0. This is not a problem with the slowly varying signal levels observed when recording a standard spectrum; however, when transmitting a transient, it is important to match all impedances to prevent reflections of the electrical signals at the interfaces. A 50-ohm terminator was inserted at the interface between the cable and the ADC. It was also discovered that the output impedance of the EPR output amplifier was about 10 k0. An operational amplifier circuit based on a National Semiconductor LH0032C and LH0063C, capable of driving a 50-ohm load was built The bandwidth of the buffer amplifier is 3.5 MHz, sufficient for the pulse response of this system. At this point it was thought that the system was ready to use; however, the first attempt to study a transient reaction proved otherwise. The reaction rate observed was much slower than could be explained by the chemistry involved. It was discovered through pulse response tests described in Chapter 6, that me EPR output filter time constant was longer by a factor of 10000 than indicated on the front panel of the instrument. When the filter was modified to correct this problem, system noise rose to a level that totally swamped the detector electronics. The noise problem led to an immediate need for a study of the electronics of the EPR amplifier-phase detector circuits, after which everything except the 2MHz oscillator was rebuilt. Details are discussed in Chapter 6. The 29 amplifiers were replaced with home built low noise amplifiers and the phase detector was replaced by a Mini-Circuits Laboratory, ZAD-1, double-balanced mixer. In building the circuitry, a trade—off between SIN and amplifier bandwidth had to be made which thereby eliminated the possibility of studying reaction rates shorter than 5 pm. Total instrumental time constants were measured by switching the 2MHz modulation to the cavity modulation loop on and off while the EPR was at the maximum of a strong pitch resonance peak and recording the corresponding decay of the EPR output signal. Actual time constants of 3, 10, 100, and 2500 um were determined and the labels on the front panel output filter switch were changed to these measured numbers. The Fieldial The magnetic field to be applied to the sample is selected by using digital controls on a Varian F ieldialTM Mark II magnetic field regulator. The selector controls indicate field density directly in kilogauss. The Fieldial senses the magnetic field through a temperature-controlled Hall-effect transducer lowted on one of the magnet pole tips and drives the magnet power supply to maintain the selecmd field value. A field-sweep range selector on the Fieldial in conjunction with a field-sweep potentiometer driven by an AC motor provides a repetitive saw tooth sweep of the magnet field over the selected field range. The field-stability and sweep-linearity specifications of the unit are excellent; however, there is no 30 direct was to control the field sweep externally. There is a potentiometer connected to the field-sweep motor which gives a reference voltage proportional to the position of the field-sweep potentiometer, but his will not allow control of the field; it only lets one follow the position of the F ieldial. One approach to external control could be to switch the field-drive motor 0N while the computer follows the field reference voltage and switch the motor OFF when the appropriate voltage is present. However, this approach is unacceptable for several reasons. When the motor is switched off, it continues to turn for a short period of time after the power is off making it difficult, if not impossible, to stop at the exact field desired. To minimize this overshoot, an extremely slow scan rate would have to be selected, which would mean that it would take an unacceptably long time to move from one field setting to another setting. The interfacing approach, which was selected as the best means for external control allows the computer to randomly select the percentage of field sweep desired. A detailed discussion of the interface is presented in Chapter 6. An overview will be presented here. A block diagram illustrating the function of the Fieldial is shown in Figure 2-4. The Hall-effect transducer is positioned in the magnetic field by attaching it to a magnet pole tip. A 1290-Hz reference signal is applied to the Hall-effect transducer, the field-set controls, and the sweep-range controls. The signal from the sweep-range control is applied to the field-sweep potentiometer. The signal from the field-sweep potentiometer is then combined with voltages from the field- set controls and the Hall-erect voltage at the input of an error amplifier. Any change in the field or sweep control settings results in an error signal that is 31 sesame use 8.25% 323.2 88> So 0:823. unease in 8am emmzmuozcm D ... w . L .......... J. a x . . -o v u 9!. 53me . uozcm. n ammzw" moo: .-.--.-.-... ammnmmw cohuuhmo ...: 323.». a 92:... commm cuzom 9 1|, S7. 36 Io .IH 1 8018 32 phase detected and applied as a control signal to the magnet power supply. The magnetic field changes as a result of the error signal and the Hall voltage increases or decreases accordingly. As the magnet field attains the correct value, the error signal approaches zero. By replacing the field-sweep potentiometer with a four-quadrant analog multiplier, the computer can control the field by applying a DC voltage from a digital-to-analog converter to one input of the analog multiplier. The output of the multiplier (X*Y) is connected to the error-sense board of the Fieldial. The DC analog voltage is derived from a 10-bit DAC within the computer giving a resolution of slightly better than 0.1% of the field-sweep range selected. This resolution is adequate for the small field-sweep ranges selected in this research but at a sweep range of 1 k6, the resolution is only 1 G, which is wider than many EPR lines. The DAC should be replaced with a 12-bit DAC (resolution of 1 part in 4096) for general use. The linearity of the field sweep was determined by applying a DC voltage to the analog multiplier and measuring the resultant magnetic field with a home- built gauss meter utilizing the NMR resonance of the proton. The plotted results are shown in Chapter 6, Figure 6-3. A linearity test at sweep-width settings of 10, 100, 500 and 1000 G resulted in linearity within +I-0.25% of the sweep width. These values are better than the linearity specifications claimed by Varian in their Fieldial literature (0.5% of sweep width). The short-term stability of the field was difficult to measure with the home- built gauss meter used in this analysis since it was not a tracking gauss meter. It had to be manually adjusted. The frequency to establish proton resonance was 33 selected using a variable capacitor. During the entire integration period of the frequency meter one’s hand had to be kept on the adjustment knob to prevent the frequency from changing, which prevented continuous monitoring of the magnetic field. The short-term stability results are based on five readings made over about one minute. At sweep-range settings of 50 and 100 G, with zero volts applied to the sweep input, the maximum field deviation seen was 25 mG. This change corresponds to 7 parts per million in the measured frequency. Considering the manual method of adjusting the frequency of the gauss meter, this error may not be significant. The error value is about 25 larger than the value reported by Glamm [GL73]. Wrth a voltage input of +5 volts, the maximum field excursion detected was 35 mG. An error-signal monitoring circuit was built and is described in Chapter 6. The monitoring circuit produces an analog signal proportional to the error signal in the Fieldial. The output voltage is connected to one channel of the multiplexed analog-to-digital converter in the PDP 81E computer. The main EPR computer program calls a subroutine called ERRSUB every time a new magnetic field is selected. ERRSUB monitors the error voltage and returns to the calling program when the error signal reaches a steady state. The Flash Lamp The excitation source selected for this research was a low repetition rate (4 Hz at 10 kV supply voltage) Xenon flash lamp. The lamp electronics, optics and housing were built by Photochemical Research Associated in London, 34 Ontario, Canada [PHOT]. The high voltage power supply used for the lamp was a Hipotronics Model 820-50 variable voltage supply. Characterization of the flash lamp system is the topic of Chapter 5. Only the resuits will be presented here. The duration of the light pulse was measured using a monochromator and a photomultiplier. The photomultiplier output was recorded on a storage oscilloscope. The full-width at half-maximum of the light pulse from the flash lamp is 2 us with the entire pulse over in an absolute maximum of 10 us at all supply voltages used (8, 9, 10 kV). Actinometry, a chemical photon counting technique, was employed to estimate the number of quanta of light available inside of the cavity at three lamp supply voltages (8, 9, 10 W). The quanta/pulse for wavelengths below 450 nm at 10 W in the Micro-Now cavity was 2x10”. The Computer Because of the high-speed data acquisition, instrument control, and event synchronization necessary to perform the desired EPR experiments, the system is placed entirely under computer control during data acquisition. During system tuning prior to an experiment, the computer assists the operator by acquiring, averaging and displaying results as the operator varies the many parameters necessary to tune the system. In addition to the control and acquisition function, the computer performs all the data reduction and analysis necessary to interpret the results. A number of peripherals are available for displaying and storing the results. The computer used for control and data acquisition is a Digital 35 Equipment Corporation [DEC] PDP Lab 8IE with 12k words of memory, an analog and a digital laboratory-peripherals option comprised of a four-channel multiplexed, 10-bit analog-to-digital converter (ADC), two 10—bit digital-to-analog converters (DAC), a 12-bit parallel digital input-and output port and three Schmitt triggers with selectable slope and variable trigger threshold. The Schmitt triggers can be used to synchronize the computer with external events. This option also includes a programmable real-time clock used for time synchronization of events. Additional standard peripherals on the PDP 8IE were an Extended Arithmetic Element (hardware multiply and divide circuit), an ASR 33 Teletype, a high- speed paper tape reader, and a single DECtape drive with a TD8E controller. The computer system, affectionately called the Rolling 8IE, has been enhanced by several custom and nonstandard peripherals. The addition of a dual Sykes floppy-disk drive eliminated the dependence on a single DECtape unit and was a giant step forward in reducing input-output (lIO) time for compiling and data storage. Data display was on a Tektronix storage oscilloscope [LAST] that was modified to include an ASCII character generator enabling the scope to be used for high-speed alphanumeric output. The scope was configured to emulate a line printer so that standard DEC software could be used to support the device. The computer uses DEC’s OSI8 operating system, which includes a FORTRAN ll compiler. This FORTRAN compiler permits in-line inclusion of machine assembly language (SABR) statements in the FORTRAN code yielding an extremely flexible programming tool. One can use the power and ease of FORTRAN programming when timing is not crucial, but one can also include 36 direct in-line assembly language instructions when timing is critical or when handling nonstandard peripherals. All of the programs for the EPR system were written in FORTRAN-SABR code. Listings of the main programs and subroutines used with this system are included in Appendix A. Each program will be discussed in the appropriate experimental sections of the thesis. In addition to the Rolling 8IE, a second computer was used for some data reduction and plotting of the results. This second computer is a Digital Equipment Corporation PDP 11l40 with a Floating-point Instruction Set (FIS), 28 k words of memory, an RK05 disk drive, a Tektronix T4010 graphics- alphanumeric terminal, a dual Sykes floppy disk, a surplus 900 line-per-minute line printer from an old RCA 301 computer [HAHN], and a home-built incremental plotter [H076]. Data were transferred between the PDP 8IE and the PDP 11l40 using floppy disks as the transfer medium. The transfer is accomplished by PIP8 [PIP8], a program running on the PDP 11 I40, which is capable of interpreting the data structure written by 08/8. A general purpose plotting routine, MULPLT [MULP] was used to produce the hardcopy output. 37 CHAPTER 3 Experimental Techniques Introduction The current research project was spawned by the desire to integrate a fast EPR spectrometer with a data-logger so that the combined system could be used to study transients EPR data. The interface was designed to incorporate an intelligent controller since the use of a computer as a controller provides flexibility not possible with a hardware controller or data-logger. Data-taking and experimental monitoring capabilities provided by the system software created for the interfaced EPR spectrometer are described in this chapter. The computer interface, discussed briefly in Chapter 2, was designed and built to allow computer control over the elements of the total system that are essential for the interactive data acquisition. The interfaced components include the Varian Mark II Fieldial magnetic field controller with a transducer circuit to monitor field stability, the flash-lamp trigger and the lamp monitoring circuits. The flash-lamp interface is discussed in Chapter 5. Many aspects of EPR system tune-up, such as adjusting optimum microwave power and the magnet field modulation amplitude, were not placed under computer control, but instead were left to the experimenter. Having such functions interfaced would be a luxury, not a necessity, since they add nothing to the capabilities of the instrument. A computer-controlled EPR spectrometer capable of measuring transient data is a very versatile instrument. Once the computer interface is built, the 38 flexibility of the instrument depends entirely on the computer programs written for instrument control, data acquisition, and data analysis. To accommodate a different experiment it is necessary only to modify or add to existing software, not redesign the hardware. The software written to fulfill the current research demands allows the experimenter to acquire an EPR spectrum or to monitor signal amplitude as a function of time for the kinetic data studies. The functions are combined to obtain a time-resolved spectrum of a transient radical. Since the hardware is the same for all three data acquisition methods, each method will be discussed fro the standpoint of its software implementation. The EPR Spectrum An EPR spectrum is a plot of the first derivative of the absorption signal of an unpaired electron as a function of magnetic field strength. A first derivative signal is obtained rather than a normal absorption signal as a consequence of the magnetic field modulation, which is used for Isignal enhancement. The spectrum is obtained by linearly varying the main magnetic field, Ho, and recording the EPR signal output on an X-Y recorder. The X-axis of the recorder is linked to the magnetic field sweep by some electrical method (for example, Varian uses a follower potentiometer that is ganged on the field-sweep potentiometer to provide an output voltage proportional to the magnetic field). The rate at which the magnetic field can be linearly swept depends on several factors. The magnetic field must be capable of tracking the reference signal 39 used to sweep the field. This tracking requirement is not usually the limiting factor for sweep-rate. Sweep rates of 100 Gauss/minute, linear to better than 0.02% have been reported [0075]. The sweep-rate limiting factor is usually the response time of the spectrometer detector electronics coupled to the X- recorder. The magnetic field must be swept slowly enough to allow the electronics and X-Y recorder to respond to the true line shape and amplitude of the sample. The only method of averaging a signal to improve SIN ratio when using either an X-Y recorder or a data-logger as a readout device is to increase the time constant of response of the instrument. This prevents the output signal frOm following the noise signals that are faster than the desired EPR signal. In an experiment where the signal-to—noise ratio is small, the output filter time constant must be large, possibly as much as 10 seconds, to remove random noise and allow the average signal to pass to the recorder. Such long time constants require the magnetic field scan to be very slow to prevent distortion of the output signal since it takes five time constants for the signal to reach 99.9% of the new true value after a step-function change. Wrth the MSU computer-controlled spectrometer, an EPR spectrum is recorded by using a field-step method. The computer, using a 10-bit DAC is capable of dividing the selected field-sweep range of the Fieldial into 1024 discrete steps. (Due to the nature of the interface to the Fieldial, the computer is capable of randomly selecting for its starting point any one of the 1024 discrete magnetic field values.) The field-step method of recording an EPR spectrum is best described by following the flow chart in Figure 3-1. 40 EPR scan sroee onrn a—‘3‘ ( KEPRMON;\_ ._%>___. (Lou-tum porn I EPRSCN ( srone ) i SCPLOT i {ENTER ; (ET {ENTER ; FIELD SCRLE FNRHE DRTH UPDHTE ENTER DIR COMMENT PLOT DRTR {ENTER WRITE 9999". @ YES ‘ FILE ' ND CRLL CLOSE ERRSUB RETURN FILE BVERRGE 09TH RETURN INCREH. FIELD YES CRLL FLOTDB RETURN] Figure 3—1: Flow chart for the field-step method employed by EPRSCN. 41 An EPR spectrum is one of the options that can be selected by the experimenter while the computer is in the monitor routine, EPRMON. A program listing of EPRMON along with a list of other options available to the experimenter appears in Appendix A. When the EPR spectrum option is selected, EPRMON chains to a program called EPRSCN. Through initial dialogue, the experimenter first selects a starting field value for the scan. The default starting field value corresponds to 50% of the sweep range below the magnetic field value selected on the field-set dials of the F ieldial. However, the sweep may be started at some other value. Since it may take several seconds for the Fieldial to stabilize if the starting field value is much different than the value currently selected, the computer updates the magnetic field first and then continues the remaining dialogue to allow time for the magnetic field to stabilize. The remaining parameters to be specified are the resolution and the number of data points to be averaged at each field setting. The resolution is the magnetic field sweep-width divided by the number of points to be taken across the spectrum. The maximum value that the resolution may take on is 1I1024th of the field-sweep width. The number of data points averaged affects the signal-to—noise ratio. For truly random noise, the SIN improvement in the averaged signal is proportional to the square root of the number of averages. Signal averaging is an alternative to instrument response-time filtering used by conventional EPR spectrometers. Once the scan parameters have been selected, the computer enters the data collection loop. The first task in the data collection loop is to see if the magnetic field has stabilized. The subroutine ERRSUB, called by the main 42 program, monitors the error signal generated by the error-signal interface in the F ieldial. The voltage signal produced by the error electronics appears at one input of the computer's multiplexed ADC. When the error signal reaches a constant value (which indicates that the magnetic field has reached the desired value), ERRSUB returns to the calling program. When ERRSUB returns control to EPRSCN, the requested number of data points are acquired at time intervals equal to the filter time constant and then averaged. Next, the field is incremented and the process continues until the scan is complete. The averaged data are stored as double precision integers during data collection and are converted to floating point format by a subroutine called FLOTDB. ERPSCN then returns to EPRMON where the data are auto scaled and displayed on the computer storage oscilloscope using a program called SCPLOT. SCPLOT also reports the X and Y-coordinates of the maximum and minimum points in the spectrum. The spectrum can be expanded for observation of the certain portions of the spectrum so that the operator can make decisions about parameter changes before taking additional spectra. If the operator is satisfied with the spectrum, it can be saved on an output device, such as floppy disk. Subroutine PUT writes the data file onto the specified output device. The operator is queried for a standard OSI8 “device-filename” which is used to open the output file. The name of the file, the current date, and all of the scan parameters are written into the output file for a permanent record of the scanning conditions. In addition, the operator can enter a comment that will be written into the data file identifying the sample and explaining any special conditions that were used to acquire the data. The comment may be any length and is 43 terminated by typing a control G. The data are written in a standard file format used widely within the Department of Chemistry, Le. a two character tag to describe the data on the current line, such as ‘; ‘ for a comment, ‘RD’ for real data format or ‘ED’ for end of data. The data, the scan parameters and the comment can be later recalled by subroutine GET for plotting or data manipulation using the data retrieval and manipulation monitor DATMON. The computer is left in EPRMON after the scan. Since this project was developmental in nature, the scanning technique was mainly utilized in characterizing the instrument. Standard samples such as pitch and perylene were used in the characterization experiments. Figure 3-2 is a spectrum of the perylene positive ion in sulfuric acid recorded at magnetic field increments of 0.024 G and modulation amplitude of approximately 0.1 G. Each datum is an average of 1024 samples with an instrumental time constant of 100 us. The hyperfine splitting constants determined from this spectrum are 4.11, 3.09 and 0.46 G. These values are in good agreement with the literature values reported by Carrington and coworkers [CA59]. A normal EPR spectrum should be symmetrical with respect to the central peak; this perylene spectrum, however, is asymmetric. The cause for the asymmetry is the presence of strong 2 MHz sidebands in the spectrum. Since the diode detector is a nonlinear device, its output will contain the sum and difference of the microwave frequency and the modulation frequency. These sum and difference frequencies result in sidebands, which are associated with each resonance line and are spaced at intervals of the modulation frequency, 44 .330 vmod mo $58805 20m 8 wows—26 em? no 258.. 05 mm :53on 2:. deceive": Eon Nag N 5m? @3808 Eom uremia 5 com 2638 one—bog 05 .3 85.58% < “Wm onE 45 Wm. Conversion from frequency to observed magnetic field splitting values is obtained by direct substitution into the EPR resonance equation hv = gflH (3-1) or Wm = g/3H or W... = 7” When the modulation frequency, Wm, exceeds the line width being observed (yAH), sidebands develop at intervals of Wmlv, in units of Gauss, from the resonant magnet field, Ho. Assuming a g of approximately 2 for the free electron, the sideband interval is 720 mG at 2 MHz. The 720 mG interval for sidebands is approximately twice the smallest coupling constant of perylene. Therefore, the first harmonic of the sideband, which is 180 degrees out of phase with the parent peak, will cause peak broadening and amplitude reinforcement or reduction of the second peak away from it in the spectrum. The number of prominent sidebands, n, on each side of H0 is given by ”=7Hm/2W... (3-2) The number n must be rounded to the nearest integer. The spectrum of perylene is too complex to use for demonstrating the influence of sidebands. Figure 3-3 shows a spectrum comprised of a single very narrow resonance line attributed to the solvated electron and recorded with 100 kHz and 2 MHz magnetic field modulation. The top spectrum, recorded with 100 kHz modulation (sidebands at intervals of 36 m0), is a standard first-derivative 46 (a) Millilllllllfllillt IiIlii‘illlliwllll‘WW (b) (C) tMi—NMWMMW Figure 3-3: The narrow-line spectrum of em...) in THF recorded with 100 kHz (a) and 2 MHz (b, c) field modulation. 47 curve with possible broadening due to the 100 KHz modulation. The middle spectrum, recorded at 2 MHz, shows a pair of prominent sidebands while the original resonance line almost disappears. By adjusting the reference signal phase to 0 degrees instead of the normal 90 degrees, the spectrum that would normally appear as a central line with sidebands will appear only as sidebands [P067c]. This phenomenon, show in the bottom spectrum, was demonstrated by Burgess and Brown [BU52] in a study of the NMR of protons in water. The spectrum showing the separated sidebands is easier to use for observation than the more complex spectrum of resonance lines plus sidebands; therefore, all narrow-line spectra and kinetic data were taken with the reference phase set to 0 degrees. In Figure 3-3, the two peaks, one positive and one negative, are 1.4 G apart or twice the modulation frequency expressed in Gauss. lnforrnation concerning the original resonance peak shape is lost by using 2 MHz modulation but then for line-shape analysis of extremely narrow lines, audio range modulation frequencies should be sued rather than 2 MHz modulation. Figure 3-4 is a spectrum of a Varian weak pitch (coal diluted with KCI) sample. A Varian standard weak pitch sample is 0.00033% coal, which corresponds to 1013 spins/cm in the active region of the microwave cavity. The active region of the Micro-Now cavity is 3.8 centimeters, which corresponds to approximately 3.8x10'3 spins. The spectrum was recorded with a 1 ms time constant and is the result of 128 averages. Weak pitch has a measured line width of approximately 1.2 G; thus the sensitivity of the system at a time constant of 1 ms is about 3x10“ spins/Gauss. Therefore, to use the 2 MHz EPR system 48 Figure 3-4: A spectrum of Varian standard weak pitch sample. 49 successfully, either the number of spins must be very large, or the line width must be very small. Varian advertises a sensitivity of 5x1010 spins/Gauss with its 100 kHz system at a time constant of 1 s. At a time constant of 1 ms, the sensitivity of the 2 MHz spectrometer is about three orders of magnitude less. System Tuning System tune-up involves optimizing several instrumental parameters in order to obtain the maximum signal amplitude of the true line shape for the sample being observed. Since each of the parameters involved in tuning the instrument affects the peak amplitude or line width, system tuning can be considered a special case of recording a spectrum. The normal tune-up procedure involves recording a section of a sample spectrum and then changing a parameter such as the amount of microwave power. The same section of the spectrum is again recorded and compared to the previous one. The process is repeated until the optimum setting is obtained for each parameter. Some of the parameters involved in the optimization process are the amount of microwave power, the amplitude of the magnetic field modulation, and the phase of the modulation reference signal, which is sent to the phase-sensitive detector. The controls for these parameters have not been interfaced to the computer and therefore, must be manually adjusted by the experimenter. SETUP, a specialized version of EPRSCN, was written as an aid for optimizing these parameters. SETUP allows the operator to select the section of the spectrum used for observation, the resolution desired, and the number of points to average 50 at each field setting. SETUP then displays on the oscilloscope an automatically scaled spectrum and reports the peak amplitude and width. SETUP waits for the operator to change any one of the tune-up parameters, eg. the field modulation amplitude, and press the carriage-retum key on the terminal. It then displays, without going through the dialogue again, another partial spectrum so that the results of the change can be observed. This process continues until the operator is satisfied with the setup and elects to return to the monitor program, EPRMON. Time—Varying Data The time-varying data acquisition method developed for use on the MSU EPR system is similar to the method of Piette and Landgraf [Pl60]. In the experiment performed by Piette and Landgraf, the EPR spectrometer was adjusted to one of the lines of the sample and a shutter was closed to stop illumination for the sample while the EPR output was observed with an X-Y recorder. Instead of using a continuously operated lamp to build up a steady- state population of the radical being studied, the MSU system uses a xenon flash lamp to produce a transient radical population. Data are then collected using an ADC connected to a PDP 8IE computer. The ADC is triggered by a crystal clock for precise timed-data collection. To record time varying data at a constant magnetic field strength, the operator selects the timed data acquisition program, TIMEDA, from the list of options in the monitor, EPRMON. The experiment can be followed in the flow char in Figure 3-5. It is assumed that the operator has already chosen the 51 TINED-DRTR / \ srone onrn acouxsrrrouT\_"“"°" / 3 I DISPLRY DRTR SCPLOT TJNEDR UPDRTE DIR ENTER PRRRN. N0 RETURN CRLL ERRSUB SETUP CLOCK RETURN FLRSN LRNP REQUIRE YES A ' D < a n 4 3 a 3 O RETURN no r-a or qr o a Figure 3-5: Flow chart for the timed data acquisition program TIMEDA. 52 magnetic field setting appropriate for observing the desired transient response. During initial dialogue in TIMEDA, the operator selects the magnetic field appropriate for the sample being observed. As is the case with the field-step method initialization, the computer selects the magnetic field immediately to allow time for the magnetic field to stabilize. Additional parameters that must be entered are the tie between data points, the number of data points, and the number of transient responses to average. The computer initializes the programmable clock used to trigger the ADC and waits for the operator to press any key on the terminal to indicate READY. The computer triggers the flash lamp and then waits for data from the ADC. A “lamp-flashed” signal is generated at the flash lamp at the time that the lamp flashes by an ultra-fast photodiode circuit described in Chapter 5. This pulse is received by a Schmitt trigger input at the computer, which starts both the ADC for a time zero point and the programmable clock. From this point on, the crystal clock starts the ADC at the data rage selected during the initial dialogue until the requested number of points has been acquired. The nominal conversion time for a successive approximations converter is 20 us with a sample acquisition time of 3 us; however, in practice, the shortest time interval that does not yield an ADC timing error from too-fast sampling is 25 us. This is sufficient time to average the collected data as the data are taken. The computer averages the requested number of transient responses, and pauses long enough between flashing the lamp to maintain the maximum duty cycle recommended for the lamp. 53 When the averaging process is complete, the data, which are stored as double precision integers, are converted to floating-point format by subroutine FLOTDB before returning to the monitor routine, EPRMON. The data are subsequently scaled and displayed on the storage oscilloscope to allow the experimenter to decide if the data set should be kept. If desired, the data can be written onto a storage device, such as a floppy disk for later retrieval, plotting and analysis. Acquiring kinetic data at a constant field value is not possible for all radical studies since the exact field position of the resonance peak must be know before the experiment starts. If a sample does not have a dark spectrum, i.e. a detectable concentration of the radical of interest already existing in the solution before irradiation, the probability of choosing the correct field setting for the resonance peak is very small. Radicals with a dark spectrum allow prior selection of an appropriate magnetic field by the use of the field-step method discussed previously. For example, alkali metals dissolved either in ethers or amines dissociate to produce a cation and a metal anion [T E74]. Experimental evidence also indicates the presence of the solvated electron and monomer radical in these solutions [DY71]. In fact, Friedenberg and Levanon [FR77] reported observing a dark spectrum attributed to the solvated electron in a solution of potassium metal dissolved in THF at room temperature. Thus, the kinetics of the formation and disappearance of the solvated electron peak under intermittent illumination is a possible application for the time-varying data acquisition method discussed here. 54 The time-varying data acquisition method was used to characterize the time response of the MSU EPR spectrometer. In Chapter 2, it was mentioned that the instrumental response time of the Micro-Now spectrometer was incorrectly labeled on the front panel. To determine the actual instrumental time constants, the response-time test circuit show in Figure 6-10, was devised. The double-balanced mixer was used to switch the 2 MHz field modulation which drives the modulation coils. The signal generated by the computer which normally triggers the flash lamp, was used to turn off the 2 MHz modulation and was also used as the “lamp-flashed” signal at the computer. First, the spectrometer was tuned up on a standard strong pitch sample and an appropriate magnetic field was selected to observe the maximum amplitude of the resonance line. Then, the 2 MHz modulation was switched off and the decay of the EPR signal was recorded as a function of time. This procedure was repeated for each time constant setting on the Micro-Now spectrometer. Computer-acquired data for three time-constant settings of the Micro-Now EPR are show in Figure 3-6. The nominal time-constant values of 10, 1, 0.1 us yielded calculated time constants of 120, 31 and 7 ms respectively. These values differ by more than four orders of magnitude from the labeled values. As the selected time constant is decreased, the noise level becomes a major component of the signal. In the 0.1 us plot (actually 7 ms time constant), the noise level is already at an unacceptable level. The computer could not be used to determine the time constants of the rebuilt EPR spectrometer due to the limited data acquisition rate of the ADC in the PDP BE (40 kHz). If necessary, the ADC data rate could be increased by 55 1 j: 10 US TIME CONSTANT INTENSITY ..r < z o 0’ 4.::. >- '— 2 1 US TIME CONSTANT LU ... 2' ..J < z o a) )- l" l ‘2 0.1 US TIME CONSTANT Lu .... z _r < z o to -+iH:::H+:+:rJ,H:::r: TIME (S) Figure 3-6: Computer-acquired data testing the response time of the Micro-Now spectrometer. The nominal time constant settings are 10, 1, and 0.1 us. 56 purchasing a high-speed converter. An 8-bit AID converter with 50 ns conversion time is currently commercially available. However, the computer is not fast enough to handle such high data rates. The solution to the data-rate problem is to use an analog shift register such as the one developed by Last [LA77]. The analog shift register is capable of being clocked at data rates of 10 MHz for a total of 100 samples. The sampled data may then be clocked to the output of the device at a data rate that the computer can handle i.e. 40 kHz. Only 100 data points can be taken at the maximum data rate, but additional data can be acquired while data are output to the computer, at the output rate. Time-Resolved Spectra The time-varying data acquisition method described above is of limited usefulness in the study of transient radicals that do not have a dark spectrum. However, when this method of timed-data acquisition is combined with the field- step method, the instrument has the capability of obtaining a full time-resolved spectrum of a transient radical by taking three parameter data (signal amplitude as a function of time and magnetic field). The time-resolved experiment is best described by following the flow chart in Figure 3-7. The control program, called TIME12, can be selected as one of the options in the monitor routine or it can be run as a stand-alone program without going through ERPMON. The initial dialogue to set up the experiment is necessarily the combination of the two previously discussed techniques. The experimenter selects the starting magnetic field value, which is immediately issued to the Fieldial to allow plenty of time for 57 (mm) fl mam] ELO ,_i 11H ”2 Ta: 030’ H10 RLE o sPan [.fifl NO DONE? YES CLOSE OUTPUT Figure 3-7: Flow chart for recording a time-resolved spectrum with TIME12. 58 the field to stabilize. Other parameters that are specified by the experimenter are the magnetic field resolution, the number of data points to be taken at each magnetic field value, the time interval between these points, and the number of transient responses to average at each magnetic field value. Since the total number of data points collected during a time-resolved EPR experiment can be vary large, in-memory storage of the data is not possible. Therefore, the data for each magnetic field value are averaged in memory, displayed on the oscilloscope and then written into a data file that is opened during part of the initial dialogue. All of the parameters specified by the experimenter are written into the data file along with the name given to the data file, the current date, and a comment entered by the experimenter to help identify the experiment at a later date. Typing a control G terminates the comment. When all of the parameters have been selected and the experimenter is ready, the experiment is started by typing any character on the terminal. First, the magnetic field stability is checked by a call to ERRSUB. When ERRSUB returns control to the main program, an average baseline value is obtained and then the flash lamp is triggered. Data collection proceeds in an analogous fashion to that used in the time-varying method described above. After the requested number of averages at a magnetic field value is complete, the data are automatically scaled and plotted along with a baseline on the storage scope. The data are then written into the output file. The magnetic field is incremented if the scan is not complete and the process is repeated. After the entire experiment is complete, the output fie is closed. The data acquisition can be 59 halted gracefully at any time during the experiment by typing an “S” on the terminal. After the data file has been closed, the data can be displayed on the storage oscilloscope on the PDP 81E computer; however, this computer has no hardcopy facilities. Therefore, the data file must be transferred to the PDP 11/40 computer for plotting. A translator program, PIP8 (Peripheral Interchange Program) [PIP8], translates the 08/8 data file into a file that is compatible with the PDP 11 computer operating under DOS/BATCH. The DSTRIP (see Appendix A) interprets the 08/8 data and creates secondary data files that are compatible with the plotting routine MULPLT [MULP]. Data are written in the original OS/8 file as a series of decay curves, one for each magnetic field value. DSTRIP will extract a series of EPR spectra from the data starting at any point along the time axis and continuing at the time interval selected by the experimenter. The maximum number of spectra extracted each time the program is run is 99. The file created by SDTRIP can then be plotted, 10 spectra at a time, by MULPLT. DSTRIP will also write each individual decay curve from the original data file into separated data files to be used for plotting or for data processing in order to obtain information concerning the decay mechanism. DSTRIP also has an option allowing digital smoothing of the data by calling subroutine SMOOTH. This subroutine is a Savitzky and Golay [SA64] Quadratic-Cubic smoothing routine capable of a 5-to-25 point smooth. However, care must be exercised when smoothing data because smoothing will distort the information contained in the data. Smoothing should be used for cosmetic purposes only, since the process will not yield more information than that contained in the original data 60 [EN76]. DSTRIP has one other function: it will create a data file that can be transmitted to the MSU CDC 6500 computer for tree-dimensional perspective plotting using GEOSYS [GEOS]. Figure 3—8 is a 3-D perspective plot of the decay of the solvated electron as a function of both time after the flash and magnetic field. 61 5— == ====E=EE ..EEEEE... ==_=E=== =====_== :52: :— _==. =_ = _ . M M 62 Figme 3-8' . ' A “me-r930 Ned sPfi‘ctru m Of e.(sorv ). CHAPTER 4 Applications Introduction The observation of blue solutions consisting of alkali metals dissolved in liquid ammonia was first reported in 1863 [WE63]. Since that time, it has been show that alkali metals also dissolve in amines and ethers [Ql27, 0057, D059]. However, unlike the metal-ammonia solutions that are lacking in specific optical bands or EPR patterns, which could be used to characterize the various species in solution, metal solutions in amines and ether provide abundant information about distinguishable species. Optical and EPR spectra indicate the presence of at least three reducing species in these solutions. Alkali metal-amine solutions have been studied extensively with the aid of optical and magnetic resonance techniques [DY73, CA75, GA70]. lnfonnation about metals dissolved in ethers has been obtained mainly by optical [LO72, EL63, KL71, SE77] and, to a lesser extent, magnetic resonance experiments [GL70, FR77]. These solutions appear blue in color since they possess an absorption band between 600-1000 nm. The exact position of the band depends on the metal-solvent combination [LO72, DE64]. However, it wasn't until the work of Hurley, Tuttle and Golden [HU68] that the information contained in the optical spectra was interpreted. They were able to demonstrate that the alkali metal in solution was exchanging with the sodium present in the Pyrex glassware used during preparation, thus giving rise to a third, extraneous, absorption band in the 63 spectra of the alkali metals. Therefore, only the remaining two absorption bands needed to be considered for any given metal-solvent combination [DY73]. These absorption bands have been attributed to the species M' and e'(so.v) [MA69, Gl70, KL71]. The frequency of one of the two absorption bands, the IR band, is independent of the type of metal in solution, hence, is attributed to the presence of the solvated electron species. In addition to the species identified by optical methods, EPR evidence indicates, by the observation of hyperfine splitting in the metal-amine solutions, the existence of low concentrations of a species with stoichiometry, M [V063, BA64, Ga70]. Dye [DY71] has proposed an equilibrium mechanism to describe the experimental observations. 2M(s) : M-+M+ (4-1) M' : Mo+e' (4-2) —> , _ M.(—M +6 (4-3) Even though EPR evidence indicates the presence of a monomer species in solution, the concentration is too low to observe its optical spectrum under static conditions. However, using flash photolysis coupled with optical absorption techniques, researchers have observed a third absorption band associated with a transient intermediate produced in the solution [GA71, KL71]. They proposed that the intermediate species was a monomer radical, M -. Alkali-metal ether solutions present an excellent application for a transient EPR study. The original species is solution, M', is diamagnetic and will not be observed with EPR techniques. After the flash, a single resonance line for the e' 64 (30M and multiple lies for the monomer, M ~, if present as suggested [MA69, GL70, KL71], should be detected and will show the same lifetime as was seen in the optical studies. The EPR spectrum of the monomer should contain 2l+1 lines where l is the nuclear spin of the alkali metal. The nuclear spin of sodium is 3/2, producing a quartet of lines. The Sodium-THF Sample In order to obtain a better understanding of the species present in alkali- metal solutions in ethers, a study of Na-THF (tetrahydrofuran) using EPR techniques was proposed. Sodium was chosen as the alkali metal in order to complement previous studies which deal exclusively with potassium and higher alkali metals. In related work that has been reported, Glarum and Marshall [GA70], using a modified Varian EPR spectrometer (response time of 200 us), observed an increase and subsequent second-order decay of the solvated electron signal for potassium, rubidium, and cesium in dimethoxyethanen (DME). They concluded that the recombination kinetics of the solvated electron indicated the probable presence of an M radical, but they could not explain the absence of a signal from the monomer in the EPR spectra. The optical spectrum of Na' in THF shows the presence of Na' and e180") Absorption peaks [L072]. The Na-THF solution should give rise to a strong EPR singlet due to e130”) but contrary to the results obtained optically, EPR, being much more sensitive than optical techniques, might observe hyperfine splitting 65 from the monomer. Irradiation of the sample with light containing wavelengths above 600 nm, the region of the Na' absorption band, should produce an increase in the concentration of the e'(so..,) and either a sodium monomer or a sodium cation. Using flash photolysis and optical absorption techniques, Kloosterboer [KL71] observed an immediate decrease of Na- absorption after the flash coupled with the appearance of a strong e130“) absorption at its IR band. As the em“) absorption decreased, a third band, interpreted by Koosterboer as Na (monomer radical), appeared and subsequently decayed leaving only the original absorption band. The second-order decay kinetics of the e130”) suggests that the intermediate is composed of one sodium cation and one e'(soM. However, it has been suggested that the transient absorption band observed in this research was actually due to the presence of a potassium contaminant in the solution, not sodium monomer as reported by Kloosterboer [CA77]. A similar kinetic study experiment yielded results, which are in apparent conflict with the reaction mechanism proposed by Kloosterboer. Huppert and Bar-Eli [HU70], studying Na—amine solutions optically, interpreted their findings by the mechanism: Na- —) Na 0 + 3‘ (4-4) and a subsequent second-order recombination of M': Na 0 + 3’ —+ Na- (4-5) The addition of Nal did not change the kinetics to pseudo-first—order and therefore, it was assumed that Na~, not Na*, was formed upon sample irradiation. However, they did not observe a Na absorption peak. Similar results 66 were reported by Gaathon and Ottolengthi [GA70] studying Na-amine solutions and again the monomer was not detected. They reported that the mechanism for sodium appeared to be different than that generally accepted for potassium. Potassium solutions decay to their original state through a transient intermediate, which is thought to be a monomer radical. The introduction of organic macrocyclic complexing agents for alkali-metal cations, increases the stability and the solubility of metals in solution and opens many interesting possibilities in the study of alkali-metal solutions [L072]. Friedenberg and Levanon [FR77] reported an EPR study of potassium, rubidium, and cesium in THF with and without the presence of crown ether. Without the addition of crown, CR, the only paramagnetic species, which was observed, was the solvated electron. With the addition of a small amount of CR, a weak signal corresponding to the monomer was detected. Due to poor SIN ratio of the monomer signal, the kinetic study was based on the observation of the decay of the e'mm resonance line. They reported pseudo-first-order rate constants for potassium, rubidium, and cesium in THF at different CR concentrations and found them to be CR concentration dependant. For the present study of the Na-THF system, the cation-complexing bicyclic diamine ether (2,2,2-crypt), a more powerful complexing agent than crown, was added. The complexing agent, 0222, is expected to enhance the concentration of Na' and solvated electrons according to the equilibria suggested by Dye [DY73]: 2M(s) : M‘+M‘ <4-6) 67 M5 : M °+e' (4-7) -) , _ Moe M +3 (4-8) M"+C: M*C (4-9) Additionally, there may be a small increase in the concentration of monomer, which might yield a detectable monomer dark spectrum. By this effect, Friedenberg and Levanon [FR77] were able to observe a dark spectrum of potassium monomer with K-THF solutions when a small amount of crown either was added as a cation-complexing agent to their solutions. However, adding large amounts of complexing agent may produce other reactions, such as ion- pair formation, which cause the monomer to be undetectable [FR77]. Care must be taken in sample preparation since, only as long as crypt, C, is in excess, is it certain that both Na- and e- will be observed. For a saturated solution of sodium and 0222, the em.” concentration depends upon the equilibrium: Na-+C: Na+C+Ze- (4-10) Experimental evidence indicates that the equilibrium constant for this reaction heavily favors the formation of Na'. Dye [DY71] reported observing the disappearance of infrared absorption band of em”) in a saturated solution while observing an off-scale absorbance at the Na' absorption band. Lacoste [LA76] has estimated the equilibrium constant for the equilibrium in Equation 10 as approximately 10'”. However, it is difficult to totally saturate the Na-THF-C222 solution because of the time required to complete the saturation process. 68 Therefore, there will be both an excess of 0222 in the solution and an e'(so.,,) concentration above the em], concentration. The details of the preparation of reagents, glassware and the samples used in this study are discussed elsewhere [DA79, L072]. To retard sample decomposition, after preparation, the Na-THF solution was kept at liquid nitrogen temperature until the EPR instrument was set up. The experiments were performed at -20 0, again to retard sample decomposition. The sample temperature was maintained by passing a regulated stream of cold nitrogen around the sample which was in a quartz dewar in the EPR cavity. The temperature was measured using a copper-constantan thermocouple. Figure 4-1 is a dark spectrum of the Na-THF-0222 solution recorded with the 2 MHz EPR spectrometer. The sweep range is 10 Gauss. The observed singlet which is distorted by the 2 MHz modulation frequency (see Chapter 3), is attributed to the em”). In an attempt to observe hyperfine splitting due to the sodium monomer, the spectrum of Na—THF was scanned in increments of 10 Gauss, over a 50 Gauss region 0 either side of the e130", resonance line. The presence of a monomer escaped detection. Based on the reported coupling constants for K and Rb in THF (25 and 150 G [FR77]), resonance lines for the sodium monomer should fall within the region investigated. An experiment to determine the kinetics of the photoelectron by monitoring the em”) resonance line was undertaken using the time-varying data acquisition procedure discussed in Chapter 3. The magnetic field was adjusted to allow observation of the e130») resonance line near its maximum absorption and then the computer, running program TIMEDA, flashed the lamp and acquired the time- 69 55388 2% E: N a? Bass: “$05532 .s 558% < ”3 05mm 70 INTENSITY SIGNAL 0.000 1.000 TIME (SEC) x1e “1 Figure 4-2: The e’mm signal as a function of time after a perturbing illumination pulse recorded with 2 MHz modulation and a 1 ms filter time constant. 71 varying data. Figure 4-2 shows a decay curve obtained from 16 averages using a response time constant of 1 ms. The disappearance of the photoelectron signal was extremely slow making averaging (the only method available to increase the SIN lost when the response time of the instrument was reduced) a very lengthy process. The lamp-trigger signal was delayed an additional 10 seconds after the data were collected, but this time interval was not nearly long enough to allow the total decay of the e130.” line. The long decay time of this signal is not best suited for study using a 2 MHz instrument because of the need to average to obtain a reasonable SIN (for random noise, SIN improvement is proportional to the square-root of the number of averages). The SIN ration is needlessly reduced in this kinetic experiment by using the wide bandwidth of the 2 MHz spectrometer. Since the microwave cavity being used was a Varian cavity with 100 KHz modulation coils on the sidewalls and a 2MHz internal modulation loop, the Micro-Now 2 MHz EPR field modulation and phase detection electronics were replaced with the Varian 100 kHz modulator and phase detector and the experiment was repeated using the analog output normally used for the 100 kHz oscilloscope display. The time constant for this signal output is 300 us; however, additional RC filtering (20 ms) was used. The 0.3 and 20 ms time constants were experimentally verified. A dark spectrum of the Na-THF solution at —20 0 recorded with 100 kHz modulation is show in Figure 4-3. Because of the decreased modulation frequency (sidebands at 36 mG intervals instead of 720 mG), the ego“, resonance line appears as a conventional first derivative signal. Again, scanning around the em") signal did not reveal the presence of the monomer. 72 .8332: 22.“ N5 2: a? 8282 aboiaazs 58% < ”3. 05mm 73 ..-_____..—- __’_— as . k1 \VN‘vax =~ : ==fi==== ///// ///// 203% ‘— S— a 85—. ...- u- . =\= /////// // ...; , //// 44/////////46z%%%§5§.¢v~.== xx x/ a”? ...: \\\\ 2,2, _\_\.\___xvvmwfifimmwfifiwwwwwwfifiE.-n w\\\\\\ . \\\\\\§\\\\ RR ‘ihiih s§§§§.ES~==--------n-u-n-nu.-nun-Ill..- === ...—....nnnnun I ///¢//// 5:: .....wavv$\\\\\ .. _ \\\\\\ \\ \\ \\\\\\\““\\\\\\\\ Msswxxxxssx E: \EESE.======_ == ...—5:...“ ...—......— “ ...-E...“ III I \ .. \..u§\\v . M. _\\\\\\$\\\\\\\\\\\\ Sc\SSS‘SS:E.&.~.~.~.~..—~__.=...- ==§_.=_......ufi......=.==.====n====== ____ =_====_===.== ======. ====- ==_====_.....====_...—.5...- =======I= _. , ... E. . ill- \lllilllil.‘ . . 1“ .2. === FiQUre 4.4. Olved Spectru m of mOdUIation. e' ’ (solv) employing 100 kHZ field 74 A time-resolved spectrum of the 6mm resonance was recorded using computer program TIME12 and is shown in Figure 4-4. The data were recorded with a time constant of 20 ms and at intervals of 0.1 s (5 times the time constant). The flashing of the lamp was delayed an additional 20 s after the data were collected to allow for a total decay of the signal. No averaging was done, but the data were digitally smoothed before plotting. Another method of displaying the information encoded in the time-resolved spectrum in Figure 4-4 is to extract information from the time-resolved data set to reconstruct an EPR spectrum at various times after the flash. Program DSTRIP will remove this information as described in Chapter 3. Figure 4-5 contains six such spectra. The spectra show the em") resonance line starting at 0.1 s and continuing at 10 s intervals after the flash. Figure 4-6 shows the decay of the e'mw) signal recorded near the maximum of the resonance under the same experimental conditions as the time- resolved spectrum in Figure 4-4 except that this plot is the result of 16 averages. These data have not been smoothed. The calculated tm for this decay process $25s Because the decay of the photolytically produced species is slow, an attempt was made to observe the monomer by scanning the magnetic field while manually triggering the flash lamp every few seconds. For a long-lived species, this process should build up an observable population of the radical; however, the experiment produced negative results. 75 Figure 4-5: Spectra extracted from the time-resolved data set in Figure 4-4 showing the spectrum at 0.1 ms after the flash and continuing at 10 5 intervals. 76 INTENSITY SIGNAL 0.000 5.000 TIME (SEC) x19 '1 Figure 4-6: The decay of the em...) signal as a function of time recorded with 100 kHz field modulation and a 20 ms filter time constant. 77 Discussion The absence of a hyperfine multiplet for sodium, as well as for some other alkali metals in THF, has been previously observed. Catterall et al. [CA77] stated that EPR spectra indicate the higher alkali metals in THF will yield a singlet from the solvated electron and a hyperfine multiplet from the monomer while spectra of lower alkali metals will be a single resonance line. Caterall described this phenomenon as a time-average of the two possible environments for the unpaired electron. He indicated that even spectra of potassium solutions have been reported as a single line. However, since that article, EPR spectra containing hyperfine splitting attributed to potassium monomer have been reported [FR77]. Hyperfine splitting of K in THF was observed under continuous illumination without the addition of a cation-complexing agent and was also observed in the dark spectrum with the addition of a small amount of crown ether, CR, as a cation-complexing agent. However, at CR concentrations above 10" M, a monomer spectrum was no longer detected. Friedenberg and Levanon [FR77] suggest that the disappearance of the monomer spectrum is due to ion- pair formation, which exchanges with the monomeric species yielding a single average resonance line. When documenting the detection of the potassium monomer, F riedenberg and Levanon [F R77] included a spectrum of a K-Na-THF solution, which showed only the same lines as the lines observed in the pure K- THF solutions. Even under conditions that produced a K spectrum, Na was not observed. This does not, however, imply that the same results would be 78 obtained with the addition of cryptate, a much stronger cation-complexing agent. Under the proper reagent concentrations, the monomer may be observed. If hyperfine splitting from sodium is to be observed, the chance of detecting it would increase by studying the solution at room temperature or above rather than at —20 C (253 K) which was used during these experiments. Friedenberg and Levanon did not observe the potassium monomer below 230 K, while at room temperature; they observed hyperfine splitting in a dark spectrum of K-THF with crown ether added. There is a limited amount of reported research on the kinetics of sodium- ether solutions. Studies have been hampered by the limited solubility of sodium in these solvents. Glarum and Marshall [GL70] reported a kinetic EPR study of potassium, rubidium and cesium; however, they were not able to dissolve sodium in DME. DME left in contact with sodium for several days, was pale green in color and absorbed light at 480 nm instead of the usual 670 nm Ma- band. However, the solvated electron signal was observed and its amplitude increased upon illumination; but they believed that the species in solution were decomposition products rather than the desired Na’. To prevent irradiation of the 480 nm absorption band attributed by Glarum and Marshall to decomposition products, a red filter was inserted between the flash lamp and the sample. The addition of the filter had no effect on the observed results. The calculated tm for the decay of the e150") resonance line in the Na-THF solution reported in this study is 25 seconds - much longer than was expected. However, the sodium solutions previously studied did not contain a complexing agent. Friedenberg and Levanon [FR77] studied potassium, 79 rubidium and cesium in THF with crown present and reported that the recombination rate constants were dependent on the crown concentration. They proposed the process below to account for the decrease in the rate constant with an increase in the CR concentration: e‘+MCR‘ ->elMCR* (4-11) This process competes with the recombination process: 6‘ + M+ -—» M (4-12) The proposed ion pair (e', MCR“) would have a broad EPR signal that would be masked by the solvated electron signal. Friedenberg and Levanon [FR77] reported a factor of 13 decrease in the observed rate constant for potassium in a 2x104 M CR solution compared to a solution without CR yielding a t"; of 0.1 s. Since the reaction rate recorded for Na-THF is still significantly longer than that reported for potassium above, it is possible that we are observing a different phenomenon. The cryptate, 0222, is in excess in the Na-THF solutions. Thus, the species in solution are Na‘C, Na', 0, e130“), Irradiation with light containing wavelengths around 670 nm, the region of that Na- absorption band, will remove one electron [HU70, GA70]. The monomer produced is in an excited state and will decay by losing another electron. The newly created cation has two reaction paths to follow as shown below: 80 Na JrhV Na+=2e' : Na' (4-13) + C it Na+C The complexation reaction between Na+ and 0222 is known to be fast. An estimate for the recombination rate for sodium can be obtained from the flash photolysis work of Kloosterboer et al. [KL71]. They optically observed a tug approximately equal to 0.15 s for the disappearance of the e130,.) signal. Even though it is generally accepted that the product being formed was K' due to potassium contamination rather than Na, the observed lifetime can be used as an upper limit for the sodium recombination since K‘ formed more rapidly than Na-. This number is only an estimate because both the solvent (DME) and the temperature (-60 C) in Kloosterboer’s study were different that in the current work. The e'(so.,,) will not displace the Na+ from the crypt; therefore, the disappearance of the e130”) signal would depend upon the rate of release of the Na+ from the crypt. This release rate via the proposed mechanism below has been measured using Na23 NMR [01577]. + -* + Na C ‘_ Na +C (4-14) The release rate of Na+ from 0222 was determined at 298 K for the Na-THF- 0222 solution and was reported along with the thermodynamic parameters AHJ, 81 A35, and AGOI. Using these parameters, AGO¥ and the release rate constant (k- 1) and tug at a different temperature can be calculated by Equations 4-15, 16,17: AG6=AH6-TASB (445) T u K_1= Ef—e‘AGo/ RT (4-16) 0.693 = — (4-17) T1 / 2 K_1 The calculated Tm at 253 K is 6.5 s. This number is respectably close to the measured 25 s Tm. The reaction rate measured was probably the rate of release of Na+ from 0222, not the recombination rate of Na. and 2e'. Recommendations The complex chemistry of alkali-metal solutions in ethers and amines is not completely understood. There is still much controversy about the nature of the species in solution. Many mechanisms have been proposed to explain the observed and unobserved experimental evidence. A systematic transient EPR investigation of sodium solutions (the alkali metal lease studied) could possibly reveal some very important data on the species in solution. A series of sodium solutions, with varying concentrations of cryptate, could either allow the observation of the monomer under the “proper” reagent concentrations or provide very strong negative evidence that would support ion-pair formation and exchange mechanisms. 82 The study of alkali-metal solutions could be greatly enhanced by the addition of an optical spectrometer to the EPR system to allow direct comparison of EPR and optical kinetic data. A simultaneous optical and ESR spectrometer (SOESR) [WA76] could yield the correlation between optical and EPR data necessary for understanding the chemistry involved in alkali-metal solutions. The 2 MHz EPR spectrometer could be enhanced considerably by adding a pulsed laser source for the kinetic studies. The biggest problem with the 2 MHz spectrometer is the signal-to-noise ratio. The current experiments were performed under conditions near the limit of detection for this instrument. The addition of an intense, collimated source might produce a large enough signal to make the 2 MHz instrument a viable kinetic tool. 83 CHAPTER 5 Characterization of the Flash Lamp Introduction Since the mid 60’s, EPR has been used to investigate transient radicals generated by photochemical, electrochemical, and electron irradiation processes. More recently, it has become possible to obtain kinetic information on radical reactions, which can be carried out in the EPR sample cavity. Modifications to existing EPR instrumentation have enabled experimenters to follow rapid changes in radical concentrations as a function of time. Free radicals investigated in this way have been produced by flash photolysis [BE67, AT70, Fl67], pulsed electrolysis [6071, G074], and pulsed radiolysis [FE73, SM71]. The technique involves applying a perturbation pulse to the sample and averaging the transient response obtained from the EPR. Early flash photolysis experiments were carried out using a continuously operated light source in conjunction with a rotating slotted disk to provide intermittent illumination of the sample [GA70, HAM70]. The main limitation to this approach is the mechanical problem associated with the very high-speed rotating disk, which is necessary for observation of radical lifetimes on the order of ms and below. Since the perturbation pulse must be significantly shorter than the lifetime of the radical under study, the rotating disk method is restricted to studies of long-lived species. Several investigators have overcome this problem by using lasers [AT73, HAL72] to produce intense light pulses of short duration (<1 84 us). These short, intense light pulses make a laser an ideal irradiation source, but unfortunately, lasers are only available in a relatively narrow range of wavelengths, which does not include much of the ultraviolet, a region in which a great number of photochemical reactions occur. This chapter is devoted to the approach taken by this investigator — a fast- extinguishing flash lamp that has a spectral output from the ultraviolet to the infrared. In this chapter, the flash-lamp trigger and flash-detection circuitry are presented and the flash lamp is characterized. Finally, the chemical photon- counting technique called actinometry, used to measure the ultraviolet light intensity available in the EPR cavity, is discussed. The Flash Lamp The flash lamp was purchased from Photochemical Research Associates, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario. The circuit in Figure 5-1 shows the flash lamp with the associated high voltage supply and trigger circuitry. A thyratron was placed in series with a Xenon Corporation Suntron 6C flash lamp to give control over timing of the flash and to allow the flash lamp to be operated at voltages above the normal hold-off voltage of the lamp. In this circuit, capacitor 03 is charged to 400 Vdc by the voltage doubler made up of diodes D1, 02 and capacitors C1, 02. A 5-volt pulse at the trigger input of the lamp causes the SCR, S1, to turn on, discharging capacitor 03 through me primary of transformer T3. The secondary of T3 is 85 .3580 Emmi“ 3308mm use 952 amen 65 330% :8..me 3:85 ”Tm oBmE zoZomzzoo Ar 9&3 a 2 35...; 131‘ be; u 2. «3&3 u C 2325:: 0 mcmxcoemzée ozoxz 2.02 TN“ .... mamfimozoz Edi mafia Jr .0 O _< . 2b:— 225! .A II... .C H .....o .47 . . m: 2 EN _ m+ m+ m+ m+ 88 Since the timing of the data acquisition should start when the lamp actually flashes instead of when the computer requests a flash, a “lamp-flashed” signal is generated at the lamp by the circuit in Figure 5-3. An ultra fast response (<1.0 ns) PIN silicon photodiode is mounted on the outside of the flash-lamp housing. A small hole was cut in the lamp housing allowing some of the light from the lamp to strike the photodiode. When the photodiode starts to conduct, a TTL signal is sent to a Schmitt trigger input on the analog peripheral option of the PDP 8IE. The analog control board in the computer was modified so that a Schmitt trigger pulse could be used to stat the crystal controlled clock without requiring software intervention. DEC literature indicates that this function is available on the lab peripherals option; however, it was not previously implemented on this particular computer. It now works as stated in DEC’s documentation. A second photodiode is used to obtain the integrated intensity of the light pulse so that the variations in each light pulse can be taken into account in the data manipulation. The circuit is show in Figure 5-3. The capacitor on the input of the integrator is used to prevent the negative operational amplifier input from saturating and thereby losing the intensity information. A sample-and-hold amplifier samples the integrator output after 70 us to allow time for the integrator to drain all the charge from the input capacitor. The sample-and-hold amplifier “holds” the voltage output of the integrator until the computer has time to sample the signal. The integrator is discharged by a resistor across the integrating capacitor of the operational amplifier. The time constant of the discharge, 50 ms, is long enough so that it will not affect the integrated light pulse signal before the 89 0\c Oh 0883:: Em: can 883% «scams—«68$ 2E. ”Wm 2:me nuruc: DJOIIOZCIMszco .Alll unused [4ID> Imam: c... A hhnxzom or f coma: I no 040: u a muaxcm a o NJGChmozo: mos 2% n+ fluid «roux; + .519» /_ H “330.9 3+ .4 2. ill—o h, good 90 sample-and-hold amplifier captures the signal (70 us). Since the maximum lamp repetition rate is 4 Hz with a 10 kV supply voltage, the discharge resistor has sufficient time to discharge the integrator (5 time constants). The discharge resistor approach was taken to eliminate the need for another control line from the computer to the flash lamp to control a shorting switch across the capacitor. The sample-and-hold amplifier timing is controlled by the flash detection photodiode. Characterization of the Flash Lamp The total energy dissipated by the lamp during a flash is determined by the capacitance across the tube and the supply voltage to the capacitor according to Equation 5-1 E=1/2CV2 (5-1) where E is the energy in joules, C is the capacitance, and V is the applied voltage. The capacitance of the storage capacitor was determined by using it as the integrating element of an operational amplifier (O.A.) integrator. A Heath [HEAT] voltage reference source (VRS Model EU-80A) with an optional current probe was used as a constant current source to charge the integrator. The test circuit is shown in Figure 5—4. The OFF-ON switch controls the current to the integrator and the start and stop of a Heath Universal Digital Instrument (UDl) in timer A-B mode. The capacitance is calculated using Equation 5-2 91 .8on 853633 :3me .4. 31m onE 0\z >¢Jm¢ Lb? I l fie. ~\> mo 0mm CCU but Jib: OHIO >¢¢n 92 C=Q ' _=l V u;— (52) where l is the current, t is the time and V is the voltage of the integrator measured at the end of the integration time, t. The measured capacitance was 0.540 [JR The maximum recommended operating voltage of the lamp is 10 kV; therefore, the maximum energy dissipated in the lap is 27 joules/pulse. This, unfortunately, is below the 100 joules per pulse recommended by the manufacturer for optimum spectral output. The small capacitance is a trade-off that had to be made to decrease the flash pulse-width to the desired <10 us value since the size of the capacitance affects the length of the flash. The characteristic of a flash lamp, which limits the observable reaction rate is the pulse width. This was determined by placing the lamp in front of the entrance slit of a Heath (Model EU-700) monochromator and observing the photomultiplier voltage output on a Tektronix 7623A storage oscilloscope. This measurement was made at several wavelengths and supply voltages. The results are shown in Figure 5-5. The full width at half maximum for the pulse is about 2 us with the entire flash over in an absolute maximum of 10 us at all supply voltages used. The most important characteristic of a flash lamp, optics and sample chamber system is the number of photons of an appropriate energy that arrive at the sample. This number depends on the intensity of the flash lamp, the collection efficiency of the optics, and the size of the opening in the microwave cavity. This number is most easily determined using a photon counting solution in the EPR cavity. The chemical photo-counting technique is called Actinometry. 93 Measured at 360 nm Measurd at 450 nm ..f ..-_.._-:- . ..rf .y "QR-u.- 2 us/D lamp pulse shape 5. #“v. " v." .m: -, ,. :’(‘{':II;L“V' iv with a 10 kV lamp supply voltage. The The flash- abscissa is 2 ps/div. Figure 5—5 94 A potassium-ferrioxalate actinometer was used as the photon counting solution. The ferrioxalate actinometer, rated as the best solution-phase actinometer available today [CA66], is easy to use and sensitive over a wavelength range of 250-480 nm. A detailed discussion of the actinometer, including its nature, preparation, purification and use, has been published by Hatchard and Parker [HA56, PA53]. However, a brief discussion will be presented here to acquaint the reader with the technique. When sulfuric acid solutions of K3[Fe(C204)3] are exposed to light in the range of 250-480 nm, a simultaneous oxidation of the oxalate and reduction of iron to Fe(|l) occurs. The quantity of Fe(ll) produced can be determined by first complexing it with 1,10-phenanthroline in an acetic- acid, sodium-acetate buffer of pH 3.5 and then measuring the absorbance of the complex at 510.0 nm. The high molar absorptivity of the Fe(ll) complex, E=1.11x10‘M"CM“, makes it possible to determine very low photon levels. Stock solutions were prepared, as recommended [HA56], from solid K»,[Fe(C204)3]-3H20 which had been recrystalized three times from deionized water. Weighed quantities of the recrystalized solid were dissolved in 0.1 N H2804 and diluted to volume in volumetric flasks. Since the actinometer is highly sensitive to normal room light, all solutions were prepared in a dark lab and stored in a closed cabinet until use. Preparation of the Working Curve A calibration curve for the 1,10~phenanthroline iron(ll) complex was prepared using ferrous ammonium sulfate [C162] as an iron standard instead of 95 using the iron standardization procedure published by Hatchard ad Parker [HA56]. The Fe(ll) stock solution was prepared by dissolving the ferrous ammonium sulfate in 0.1 N H2804. A standard 5.0 x 10‘4 M Fe(ll) solution was prepared from the stock solution. This procedure requires all of the iron in the standard solution to be in the Fe(ll) oxidation state, so hydroxylamine hydrochloride was added to reduce any Fe(lll) present. Another departure from the method of Hatchard and Parker was a 20-fold excess of 1, 10-phenanthroline used to ensure total complexation of Fe(ll). The following volumes of the Fe(l) solution were added to eleven 25 ml volumetric flasks: 0 (blank), 0.5, 1.0, 5.0 ml. Added to each flash was 5 ml of buffer, 4 ml of 1, 10-phenanthroline, 1 ml of hydroxylamine hydrochloride and sufficient 0.1 N H280, to bring the total number of milliequivalents of acid to 1.25. The solutions in the flasks were diluted to volume, mixed and allowed to stand at least one-half hour. The absorbance was measured using a McPherson Model EU-700 Spectrometer with an oscillating sample cell. Figure 5-6 shows the fitted results of the working-curve data. The least squares fitted slope of the working curve, E, was 1.11x104M'1CM", numerically equal to previously reported molar absorptivity values [HA56, H069]. Photolysis Experimental Setup The EPR cavity was removed from the microwave bridge of the EPR instmment and clamped to a ring stand on a lab bench for easier access. The task of focusing the lamp on the sample in the Micro-Now EPR cavity was a very 96 ABSORBANCE 0.00001' 0.0 0001b FE(II) MOLARITY -ru- .4 o-l- Figure 5-6: A calibration curve of absorbance of 1,10-phenanthroline Fe(ll) complex as a function of Fe(ll) molar concentration. 97 difficult one. According to manufacturer’s literature, previous Micro-Now cavities were designed for coupling with a linear accelerator beam. Such a well- collimated source does not require a large opening in the sample cavity wall. The actual opening in the cavity wall of this micro-Now cavity is a rectangle 0.6 cm wide by 0.2 cm high. To prevent the microwave in the cavity from leaking out through the hole, a cylindrical waveguide “beyond cutoff” was welded around the rectangular hole in the cavity wall. The cylindrical waveguide is 0.6 cm inside diameter and longer than one half wavelength, 3.0 cm. It is too long and too narrow to support a standing wave at the frequency of cavity resonance and thus no microwave will leak out of the opening. This small entrance would not present a problem for a collimated source such as an electron or laser beam; however, the flash-lamp source used in these experiments is not collimated. Neither is the lamp a point source, but instead a column and the optics of the lamp focus to give a reduced size image of the column at 3.5 cm from the end of the lamp optics. This would not be a problem in an EPR experiment since the height of the focus image, 1.2 cm, is shorter than the active sample region in the microwave cavity. However, the geometry of the opening in the Micro-Now cavity prevents optimum focusing. The problem is the small area presented by the end of the cylindrical waveguide. Observation of the shape of the light beam at various distances from the end of the lamp optics revealed that at 1.5 cm, the beam had converged to its smallest diameter before diverging into a focused image. A diagram of the light beam is shown in Figure 5-7. The flash lamp was placed so that the entrance to the waveguide is 1.5 cm from the optics. A considerable amount of light was lost 98 dEm. can: 05 .6 Emma Em: 63:02 on. ..o E985 £6 2:9“. Eu m; -h “Eon— Room 99 because the minimum beam spot is still not as small as 0.6 cm. As the light stats to diverge in the cylindrical waveguide, the internal surface of the waveguide should act as a light pipe and reflect the light toward the sample. Once the light is in the waveguide, the limiting parameter is the height of the slit presented by the rectangular opening in the wall of the cavity. The slit width, 0.2 cm, will only allow about 40 percent of the light in the waveguide to enter the cavity (based on areas). The study was also conducted in a second EPR cavity to determine the amount of light lost by using the Micro-Now cavity. This cavity was a Varian transmission cavity, i.e. openings in both front and back walls of the cavity for light to pass. The opening into the waveguide and cavity were rectangles 1.2 cm high by 0.6 cm wide. This made it much easier to focus the lamp and, as it turned out, allowed more light to enter the cavity. Photolysis of the Actinometer Solution The wavelength sensitivity of the potassium ferrioxalate actinometer is concentration dependent. Plots of absorbance and quantum yield of Fe(ll) versus wavelength for several concentrations are show in a paper by Hatchard and Parker [HA56]. Selection of the concentration of the actinometer gives a natural cut-off filter. A concentration of 0.15 molar was selected which according to Hatchard and Parker absorbs all light below 450 nm. The actinometer solution was placed in a quartz NMR tube and inserted in the EPR cavity. Flash-lamp supply voltages of 8, 9, and 10 kV were used. Each 100 sample was flashed 50 times to build up an Fe(ll) concentration large enough to optically measure. The sample was stirred after every ten flashes. The analytical procedure used for the unknown was identical to that used in preparing the working curve, except the 4 ml of photolyzed solution replaced the standard Fe(ll) solution and the hydroxylamine hydrochloride was excluded. The quanta of light absorbed can be calculated by the following equation [HA56]: Quanta = AS V1 V3 (6'023x1 0 ) (5_3) ELV. where V1 = volume of actinometer solution photolyzed (5 ml) V2 = volume of aliquot taken for analysis (4 ml) V3 = the final volume to which V2 was diluted (25 ml) A. = the measured absorbance of the solution at 510.0 nm L = the path length of the cell (0.9 cm) E = the molar absorptivity of the Fe(ll) complex (1.1 1x10‘M'1cm") Q = the average quantum yield for Fe(ll) formation for light in the range of analysis (1.2) The results of this study for both the Micro-Now and Varian cavities are shown in Table 5-1. At the time these experiments were performed, the Varian cavity was not being considered as a possible alternative to the Micro-Now cavity; therefore, a complete set of supply voltages were not used. The only reason for the Varian 101 Table 5-1: Measured Quanta of Light per Pulse Available in the Micro-Now and Varian Cavities. Supply Voltage Micro-Now Cavity Varian Cavity (kV) Quanta/pulse) x10'15 Quanta/pulse) x1 0'15 8 1.02 +/- 0.29 3.14 +/- 0.37 9 1.46 +/- 0.54 10 2.05 +/- 0.48 cavity's inclusion was to determine the effect the small entrance to the Micro- Now cavity had on its total light gathering capability. As expected, the Varian cavity collected more light than the Micro-Now cavity but the difference is more than can be explained by comparing the areas of the entrance waveguides of the two cavities. The rectangular waveguide in the Varian cavity captures a larger fraction of the total light because the shape is similar to the focused image of the lamp. The number of photons per pulse is a disappointingly small number for both cavities considering the range of wavelength absorbed by the actinometer solution. Fortunately, most molecular absorption bands are very broad and will absorb light in a range of wavelengths. Even though this actinometer study did not yield any specific data about the quanta of light of wavelengths of interest for the photochemical experiments done in this research, it is important for several reasons. The results indicate that the focusing of the lamp on the sample cavity opening was not as critical as was first thought. The experiments were performed with the lamp at several slightly different positions with very similar results. This is important because 102 when one tries to focus the lamp on the cavity when the cavity is between the EPR magnet pole tips, it is difficult to see if it is perfectly focused. Secondly, the ultraviolet region is of importance in a great number of photochemical reactions. The results of this experiment suggest that such reactions could be studied with this lamp and cavity system. Also, from the spectral response curve of the flash lamp, an estimate of the quanta of light in other wavelength regions can be made. The comparison between the openings in the Micro-Now and Varian mv'rties suggest that if a new cavity were to be built, an opening similar to the one in the Varian cavity should be used. 103 CHAPTER 6 System Modifications Introduction The original goal for this research project was the design and fabrication of a computer interface to a fast EPR spectrometer with a pulsed light source, which would allow EPR data to be acquired either as a conventional absorption spectrum or alternately, as a function of time for reaction-rate studies. Computer programs to synchronize events and to record, average and manipulate the data were to be written. The resulting system would be applied to the studies of radical reaction rates in situ in the EPR sample cavity. When it was discovered that the Micro-Now 2 MHz EPR spectrometer was not appropriately designed for the fast reaction-rate studies intended, a major change in emphasis for this research project became necessary. The new goal was to develop a functioning transient EPR system. In this chapter, modifications made to the EPR system will be discussed in detail. First, the interface design, which was necessary to complete the research project as originally conceived will be presented. Finally, the modifications made to the Micro-Now system in an attempt to create a working spectrometer will be reported. 104 The Fieldial To use an EPR spectrometer as a kinetic took, it is necessary to maintain a constant magnetic field at the point of resonance, apply a perturbation pulse to the sample and record the transient response from the EPR. To obtain an EPR absorption spectrum, the magnetic field is varied and the EPR output signal is recorded as a function of magnetic field strength. The two experimental techniques have been combined to give an EPR spectrum of a transient radical. This has been accomplished by both allowing the magnetic field to scan slowly while the lamp is flashed and the data are acquired [AT68b, F I67, H072] and also by adding auxiliary field-sweep coils to the magnet pole tips [Hl68, H873]. Data collected using the former technique were acquired without signal averaging on multichannel X-Y or magnetic tape recorders. Using field-sweep coils, data are collected using a signal-averaging device, which is synchronized with both the field sweep and an excitation pulse to produce data collected as a function of time over a narrow magnetic field range. There are several problems with the latter technique [3039]: 1) the sweep fields are often nonlinear with time, 2) the auxiliary field may disrupt the static magnetic field, 3) l-r heating of the coils limits the sweep field to a range of +I- 25 to +I-100 Gauss from the static field, and 4) field homogeneity deceases as the applied field increases. The technique is also limited in the rates of reactions it can follow. The system discussed above does not benefit substantially from the use of a computer because there is no provision for allowing interactive control of the 105 EPR spectrometer. The addition of a computer does not eliminate any of the limitations, but does, of course, simplify data acquisition and reduction. More recently, Goldberg et al. [G075] reported an interactive computer controlled system, an 0. S. Walker magnet in conjunction with an FCC-4 controller, which has an external analog voltage input that allows remote control of the magnetic field. Varian, in fact, offers an accessory for their Fieldial that allows external control of the magnet field sweep rate; however, it requires that the Fieldial be modified at the factory. S. H. Glarum [GL73] reported a circuit that he installed in a Varian Fieldial Mark I allowing replacement of the original Fieldial potentiometer with a more accurate external potentiometer. This published circuit was modified to enable input from a DAC to replace the potentiometer. Some of the electronics were updated and the circuit was installed in the MSU Fieldial Mark II. The basic circuit for the externally controlled Fieldial is show in Figure 6—1. A 1290 Hz oscillator excites a loop, which contains a Hall-effect transducer, the field selector resistors, and a transformer, T1, that drives the modulator circuit. The modulator circuit is basically an analog multiplier with the 1290 Hz sine wave at one input and the DC sweep-input voltage applied to the second input through a DAC. The product of these two signals appears at the output, passes through the sweep-range selector and is combined with the outputs of the Hall-effect transducer and field selector to produce an error voltage that is used to maintain the desired magnetic field. The modulator was installed in the Fieldial Mark II at the corresponding position chosen by Glarum [GL73] for the Fieldial Mark I circuitry. The modulator 106 cog—$2 22m 0:0:me 3203 3:888 33585 05 mo oumfionom 3538mm 25. "Te 2&5 umzcc awmzm 0‘ moo—... mmumnamxc macaw 0... Al... «00¢... «00‘... eaezn muuxm _|||l0|r._¢zmuexm 1. H " Jocezog " 04m; muczcmexy w . E m m haezu u unocau~z emu. Hm HUN...“ 1 m muomezoom u hum" “ cause" 107 circuit with transformer T1 is shown in Figure 6-2. The heart of the modulator is a Burr Brown 4204 four-quadrant analog multiplier. The output from the digital- to—analog converter (range = +I-5 volts) is sensed by an Analog Devices A0521J instrumentation amplifier configured with a gain of 2. The resulting output (range = +l-2 volts) makes full-scale use of the X analog-multiplier input. The 1290 Hz reference signal is connected through a double-pole double-throw switch to a a: step-up transformer and a reference-level potentiometer to adjust the reference signal to 20 volts peak-to—peak. However, because of differences in the circuits :- of a Mark I and Mark ll Fieldial regulator, this signal was a maximum of only about 10 volts peak-to-peak. The output of the analog multiplier (X*Y/10) passes through a phase-shifter amplifier to the output amplifier. The output amplifier is connected to the sweep-range selector by a second double-pole double-throw switch. The two switches were inserted in the circuit to allow the selection of the standard Fieldial arrangement. This was necessary because the computer used as the controller in this research is used by many other researchers in the department and could not be dedicated to the EPR spectrometer. Without the switches to return the Fieldial its original condition, the EPR would be inoperable whenever the computer was needed elsewhere. The circuit diagram in Figure 6- 2 does not include the trim potentiometers necessary for the analog multiplier or offset and gain-adjust potentiometers for the various amplifiers. Connections were made to the Mark II F ieldial by inserting the modulator circuit between point 1 of the CB1101 oscillator and phase detector reference assembly and point B of switch $1007 and point F of J1001 and the wire that eventually goes to terminals 6, 6 of transformer T1003. The labels here and in 108 .20: ozocmmE 05 B .9280 .mEowxo @5595 .ofiSuoE 9: ho Ema—av «Soto ”N6 939.... c— H ~— —N@VZN fl NO m—avZN H —0 mm- Saar—Z: .Zéhtcme—z fl uh. Hunm .>HG UOA- (((zl(/\(r{((z >+ 332— u :— b 0.2: n 3 hate... u G .>I 523.54.. _ a fin _ a 20.5.5sz352. :33. :11A .. 3. ..u t r M E S. .o A “TIA a 114 hardware start for the ADC. To display the error signal when the magnetic field is suddenly changed, a minor variation of the program TIMDA (T lMed Data Acquisition) changes the DAC output, which causes the magnetic field to change and immediately starts to acquire data from the error signal output. Three examples of the error signal resulting from an instantaneous change in the selected field are shown in Figure 6-5. Figure 6—53 was recorded after a 500 G l‘ increment while a scan-width range of 1 kG was selected. The noise level at the I 1 k6 scan width is considerably higher than the noise at the 500 G scan width selected for the other two plots. This is probably due to noise on the DAC sweep signal and modulator electronics since at the 1 k6 setting, the Fieldial is more sensitive to small changes in the reference signal than it is at smaller scan widths. Figure 6-5b is the result of a 250 G increment at a 500 G sweep-range setting. The final plot (6-5c), is a 5 G change at the 500 G sweep-range setting. A 5 G increment is larger than a normal change of field when recording a spectrum. The large change in the first two plots could be the result of jumping from one end of the sweep range to the other to repeat a scan or to initialize the field before starting a scan. A subroutine called ERRSUB (ERRor SUBroutine) is called by the main program before EPR data are taken to ensure that the field has settled. When called, subroutine ERRSUB acquires groups of 100 points, divides by 100 and compares the result to previously acquired results until three consecutive results agree to +l-1. When null has been determined, ERRSUB , returns to the calling program. The minimum time for null to be declared is 0.11 seconds. The ERRSUB approach may fail if the magnetic field change is large. In Figure 6-5a, sections of the curve are flat because the electronics in the error 115 FIBER...“ Cantu... [III—al.- L. 6ch @826 0 com a 8 “coached O m < 3 emcee 30% 0 com a E 808205 0 omm < 3v .owqfi 303m 00— a a E 82565 0 com < $3 #58805 20m 030% a Sam 08% mo conga a mm 83 gasses 32008.85Q8o0 6.0 0.5mm“— Amv msz Amy mzfik ..m od 3 _ C . 1 . q _ . . ‘1—0 p P F p q . _ _ d1 a - d H a d - - 0 u q 1 4+0 .o P .- P p L b — P P . p p p P P b h - u q 1 dr 4 1 fl 1 .—r a a _ .eb dfi-jifi‘ E E I J L l l l l L ‘ WVNQIS ALISNBlNI 116 382038 32038 3:323: 333683 a: 5MB @8— coumivofi $23 98 comm—nae .538 NE N 22. 6-9 95mm; .....q £004 ZOHFH ..H. has I§om~ no: >e_>¢o c» on x” r 6 20 mmoecme 0+ hhuzzuw o... 127 is zero, a zero signal appears at the RF output. The 2 MHz local oscillator signal is zero, a zero signal appears at the RF output. The 2 MHz local oscillator signal had to be kept below 1 volt (p—p) for the double—balanced mixer to work properly. The fall time of the signal at the RF port of the mixer after the 2 MHz modulation was switched off was 0.1 ps. The measured time constants were greater than 10000 times longer than indicated on the front panel of the instrument (0.12 s for the 10 us filter position). When the capacitors in the EPR output filter were changed to select the time constants labeled on the front panel, the noise level totally swamped the demodulator electronics. The manufacturer provided a copy of the test data from the MSU EPR take before delivery. The test data reported noise levels and signal gain at two filter values: NONE and 0.01 ms. No time response data were provided. Included with the data was a list of the eight customers who purchased the Micro-Now 2 MHz EPR. Inquiries were made to see what other customers were doing with their spectrometers. The spectrometer sold to Argonne National Laboratory eight months after the MSU model was not being used [ARGO]. F. P. Sargent [SA77] changed the cavity, extensively modified the electronics, used a higher gain preamp, changed the modulation amplifier, and has given up using it because he could not get funding for more modifications. J. K. SA. Wan [WA77] modified the system extensively but is now able to use it only for very large amplitude signals. The circuits in the Micro-Now demodulation electronics were created on Vector board with wires soldered to the components. The wires were two and three deep in some sections of the circuit boards which is poor construction 128 practice for electronics operating in high frequency regions because of cross talk between wires. Decoupling capacitors, 0.1 pF, were inserted in the power-supply lines in an attempt to remove the 2MHz signal picked up by the power supplies. This failed because the power-supply common already had 2 MHz on it. Attempts to clean up the common signal by connecting it directly to the chassis of the instrument were only partially successful. Rather than attempt to rectify problems in the existing electronics, the decision was made to replace the Micro-Now modules with commercial and home-built equipment and compare SIN ratios to those obtained with the system configured using Micro-Now components. The noise level was determined by connecting a 50-ohm terminator to the input in place of the crystal current and measuring the noise at the output with an oscilloscope. The 2 MHz modulation output from the oscillator circuit was connected through a 0-81 dB attenuator to the crystal current input of the electronics for gain and SIN measurements. First, a Low Noise Amplifier, LNA [A109], was compared to the Micro-Now preamplifier with the result that the signal-to-noise increased using the LNA. This was expected because the Micro-Now preamp has a frequency range of DC to greater than 7 MHz while the LNA range is limited at the low end to 70 kHz. A look at a typical noise power spectrum shows that major components of noise are 1/f and discrete nose and they are largest at low frequencies. The LNA is a high-pass filter and removes much of the low frequency noise. This however, did create a problem with the 10kHz AFC signal and made it necessary to parallel the two preamplifiers at the crystal current input. The Micro-Now preamp was used for the AFC signal while the LNA was used for the EPR signal. The gain of 129 the LNAS is 37 dB, slightly greater than the Micro-Now preamp. The next module inline was a video amp. A video amp was originally used in the circuit to allow external blanking of the EPR signal via a PIN diode switch. The video amp was not really needed because the blanking option was not included in the purchase; therefore, it was replaced with a 2 MHz narrow band filter and a 55 dB gain tuned amp, both designed locally [A105]. Placing tuned filters and amplifiers in the circuit limits the rise time of the electronics (rise time equals 0.35Ibandwidth) but in this case, the imposed limit is a worthwhile sacrifice. The integrated circuit demodulator, Motorola MC1596L, and associated electronics were replaced by a Mini-Circuits Laboratory, ZAD-1 double-balanced mixer. This phase detector requires the input signal amplitude to be less than 1 V”) to prevent clipping, which imposes a definite limit on the amount of amplification that can be achieved while the signal is encoded in the 2 MHz carrier. Amplification at the carrier frequency allows discrimination of noise at other frequencies at the time it is phase detected since only signals near and in phase with the reference signal will pass the phase detector. To obtain the same size signal with the new demodulation as compared to the integrated circuit demodulator, DC amplification had to be added to the final output stage (see Figure 6-9). The local oscillator input to the double-balanced mixer is supplied by the Micro-Now 2 MHz reference and phase shifter circuits with minor modifications to improve the rise-and-fall times of the integrated circuit phase- lock loop in the output of phase-shifter circuit. The results of final tests of the electronics revealed that an input signal level of 3.4 pV(p.p) produced a 1 V output with a SIN of 1 using a true 10 ps filter. 130 The SIN of the 3 and 100 ps filters are 0.8 and 2.5 respectively at the same input signal level. The final time constant test revealed a minimum time constant of 3 us. This severely limits the usefulness of the EPR for transient radical studies. These results are based only on electronic noise and do not take into account any noise generated in the klystron, diode detector, or microwave cavity. The Microwave Cavity The Micro-Now cavity has several drawbacks that were discussed in Chapter 2. The most serious problem is that the magnetic resonance peak drifts slowly during low temperature experiments using a quartz dewar. The problem is believed to be caused by the cavity’s internal modulation loop. If an internal modulation loop is used in a microwave cavity, extreme care must be taken to avoid interactions between the metal wire and the electric field component of the microwave. Such interactions would cause serious loss of microwave energy and according to Equation 2-1, a drop in the cavity Q. A decrease in cavity Q not only causes a decrease in signal power (Equation 2-3), but also decreases the effectiveness of the AFC circuitry. To minimize the effects on cavity Q, internal wires must be oriented perpendicular to the E field or must pass through a region where the E field is zero [ALSBg]. A diagram of Micro-Now's modulation coil is show in Figure 6-7. The coil is a single piece of wire passing perpendicularly through the E field to the bottom of the cavity where it is bent out into the E field to go around the sample and a quartz dewar and then passes back up through the E field. The 131 position of this wire does not have a detrimental effect on cavity Q, which was measured by Professor J. Cowen [COWN] as approximately 4000. However, when a quart dewar is placed in the Micro-Now cavity, the bottom of the modulation coil is pushed into the cavity because the bend at the bottom of the coil is not large enough to go around the dewar. The modulation loop not only is not longer'perpendicular to the E field, but it is also no longer perpendicular to the sample. When working with resonance lines that are 200 to 300 m6 wide, such as the solvated electron peak, it is important that the resonance peak does not drift during the entire period of the experiment. To determine if the Micro-Now cavity was the cause of the signal drifting, another 2 MHz cavity was constructed. Rather than start from scratch, permission was obtained to modify a Varian Model E-236 Bimodal cavity (Q of 7000) as long as nothing irreversible was done to it. Smith et al. [SM77] had success reconnecting the modulation coils of a Varian E4531 cavity in parallel from the original serial configuration and series resonating the coils at 1 MHz. This approach was not taken because of the need to cut and solder wires connecting the modulation coils. The Varian coils could not be resonated at 2 MHz in the standard configuration. The inductance of the Varian modulation coils, measured with an inductance bridge (Boonton Radio Corp. Model 260-A), is 3.7 mH. It would require a series capacitance of 1.7 pF to resonate such a coil at 2 MHz. Stray capacitance in the cables is much greater than this value. 132 Since the modulation coils could not be used at 2 MHz and the side walls of the Varian cavity were too thick to allow 2 MHz electromagnetic radiation to pass through, they were removed. The side walls were replaced with pieces of G-10 circuit board with a 0.2 mil copper foil epoxied to the inside surface. The skin depth of 2 MHz is copper is 1.8 mils; therefore, 0.2 mil copper foil should not attenuate the 2 MHz modulation to a great extent. The copper foil is, however, greater than the required 5 times the skin depth of the microwave frequency and thus prevents the loss of the microwave through the walls. Copper is an excellent conductor; therefore, the resistive losses in the cavity walls will not increase and the cavity Q should not be affected by changing the walls. To verify this, spectra of a standard sample were obtained with the Varian cavity and 100 kHz modulation before and after the cavity walls were changed. No noticeable degradation of the signal amplitude occurred. Helmholz coils were wrapped in Plexiglas supports and tuned to 2 MHz. The magnetic field, B, in the center of a set of Helmholz coils is given by [Wl55] #0” r2 = 024913)?”2 l3 (6-2) where lie is the permeability of free space (1.26 x 10‘6 Weber/amp—m), l is the current in amps, r is the radius of the coil, N is the number of turns, and x is the distance to the center of the Helmholz coil pair. Unfortunately, this coil arrangement did not produce a spectrum of a standard sample, pitch. Professor K. M. Chen [CHEN], a microwave specialist in the MSU Electrical Engineering department, suggested that the skin depth of the cavity walls is not the only consideration when you have a finite wall size. The flux lines 133 passing through the coil must return outside of the cavity and since the cavity is heavy metal everywhere else, the metal outside of the cavity probably attenuated the modulation. Even though Helmholz coils provide the most homogeneous magnetic field of any coil arrangement, they appear to be of little use at 2 MHz when a metal cavity is used. Possibly constructing a non-metallic cavity for use with Helmholz coils would solve this problem. Although there was interest in building a non-metallic cavity from a machinable ceramic [P067d, LA59, C064], time did not permit such a task. The only remaining coil configuration was an internal modulation loop. The best approach to implementing internal modulation coils is to drill a couple of holes in the top and bottom of the cavity and pass a heavy-gauge wire straight through the cavity without bends. The loop would be continued by connecting the two wires outside of the cavity, avoiding interactions with the microwave field. The wires are supported at both ends of the cavity, which helps to eliminate microphonics that would be present with a coil supported only at one end, such as the loop in the Micro-Now cavity. Because EPR cavities are extremely expensive, drilling holes in an excellent Varian cavity was forbidden. The only opening already in the cavity that could be used to ring wires into this cavity is the cylindrical opening at the top of the cavity provided for the introduction of a sample and dewar. Since a dewar was required for most of the experiments that were planned, a quartz dewar was used as the support for the coil. Since there is not much room between the dewar and the cavity, a small gauge magnet wire had to be used for the modulation loop. The wire was glued down the front and back of the dewar, and the entire assembly was inserted into the Varian cavity. There are, unfortunately, two problems with 134 this arrangement. A large modulation amplitude requires a lot of current in the wire, but 28-gauge wire has a significant amount of resistance. Also, the wire is in physical contact with the metal cavity for the entire length of the neck of the cavity (1.25 inches), which results in capacitive coupling of the 2 MHz signal to the cavity and attenuation of the modulation signal. Because of these two problems, the Q of the tuned LC circuit containing the modulation loop was measured as 2. The maximum calculated modulation at the sample was 0.5 G(p—p). Even though the modulation amplitude in the modified Varian cavity is significantly less than the modulation in the Micro-Now cavity, the problem of the drifting resonance peak was removed. The modified Varian cavity was used for all of the low temperature experiments. 135 APPENDIX 136 APPENDIX A Program Listings The computer programs for instrument control and data acquisition are just as important as the hardware that the computer controls. Thus Appendix A contains commented listings of the main programs that were used to control the instrument and acquire and display the data. The programs are written in FORTRAN II with in-line inclusion of machine assembly language (SABR) statements. The program statements with an “S” in column one are SABR instructions and are ignored by the FORTRAN compiler. 137 mmmwmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmnonnnonooooooaon OPDEI'.SB FILE NAME: OPDEF.SB OPERATION DEF IN ITION IDDULE THIS MDULE CONTAINS DEFINITIONS OF THE NONSTANDAHD OPERATIONS THAT ARE USED IN ALL OF THE 08/8 PHOGNAIS. AN OPDEI" DEFINE THE MNEI‘DNIC SYMBOL THAT FOLLOWS AS AN OPERATE COMMAND AND ASSIGNS THE SYMBOL THE I/O OCTAL CODE THAT FOLLOWS THE MNENOMIC. A SKPDEF DEFINES THE MNEPNJNIC THAT FOLOVS AS A IKIP-ON-FLAG INSTRUCTION AND ASSICNS THE MNEMNIC TO THE OCTAL I/O CODE THAT FOLLOWS. THIS FILE MUST BE INCLUDED WITH ALL THE EPR PNOCRAPB. OPDEF ADCL 6530 /CLEAH ALL - A/D OPDEI" ADLM 6531 /LOAD MULTIPLEXER - A/D OPDEF ADST 6532 /CLEAR A/D DONE AND TIMING FLAGS OPDEI' ADHB 6533 /READ A/D BUFFER SKPDF ADSK 6534 /SKIP ON A/D DONE SKPDP ADSE 6535 /SKIP ON A/D TIMING ERNIE OPDEI" ADLE 6536 /LOAD A/D ENABLE REGISTER, CILAH AC OPDEP DILX 6053 /LOAD X CHANNEL D/A OPDEI" FLASH 7000 OPDEF SWAB 7431 /SWI'ICII FROM MODE A '10 HIDE B—EAE OPDEF MOL 7421 /AC 10 m. 0 11) AC OPDEI" CLZE 6130 /CLEAH CLOCK ENABLE REGISTER PER AC SKPDF CLSK 6131 /SKP 0N CLK OVENFLOW OPDEF CLOE 6132 /SET CLOCK ENABLE NECISTfll PEN. AC OPDEF' CLAB 6133 /AC TO CLOCK BUFFER OPDEF CLSA 6135 /CLEAR CLOCK OVERFLOV OPDEF CLBA 6136 /CLK BUFFER TO AC OPDEF CLCA 6137 /CLEAR AC, CLOCK COUNTER TO AC OPDEF IDCA 3400 / INDIRECT DCA TO FOOL SABR OPDEF ITAD 1400 /INDIBECT TAD TO FOOL SABR. 138 000000000000000 -0 8 101 2000—0000!” mama—nonu— ° as 0000 $000 03000 O O O 0000 FILE NAME: EPRIDNJ'T FILE NAME: EPRIDNJ'T ESR DATA AMUISITION MNITOR ALL PROGRAIB ARE WRITTEN AS SUBROUTINIS GORESIDENT IN CORE AND CALLED BY MNITUR AFTER SELECTING THE OPTION YOU WISH TO USE. IF TTIE PROGRAM IS TO LARGE TO BE COREIDENT LE. DATmN.PT. IT IS LOADED BY A FORTRAN CALL TO CHAIN. THE PROGRAM MUST BE IN A SAVED FILE ON THE SYSTEM DISK ($.SV). THE VARIABLE IN COMMN IS NOT DISTURBED IN THE CHAIN OPERATION SINCE ALL PROGRAIS HAVE THE SAME COMIIIN STATEMENT. PROGRAMMER: TIINJTHY G. KELLY OCT. 16. I975 IDDII’IED JUNE 13.1976 COMINJN IADRES.NUMINC. IDATPT. NSCAN. IDELAY.NPT‘S. ITIIE. NAVE. BASE. ISIGMA. IKINSP.YDATA.TIMPPT. NBASE. ISTART. INCREM DIMENSION YDATA( 1024) FORMATt 1X.'I = EXIT. 2 I ACQUIRE. 3 3 DISPLAY. 9 3 STORE. 15 3 FETCH'I' 6 = SETUP. 7 = DA'I‘IIIN’) PORMAT(' 3 ’.I5) FORMAT(1X. ‘ 1=ESR SCAN. 23TIMED DATA AQUISITION') FORMAT('PROMPT? ’.A1) ENTRY POINT READ( I. 103) IY TAD \IY TAD CIAY SZA CLA JMP \2 WRITE(1. 100) READ( I. 1011 IA 00 TO ( 10.20.30.40.50.60.90) IA EXIT TO (BID MNITOR CALL EXIT CALL DATA ACQUISITON PROGRAM WRITEI 1.102) READ( I. 101) IKINSP GO TO (70.80) IKINSP DISPLAY DATA ON STORAGE SCOPE CALL SCPLOT com 1 OUT'PUT DATA CALL STORE(2) GO TO 1 READ DATA FILE INTO CORE CALL PETCIRI) 0010 1 SETUP.” IS A RAPID SCANNING. FAST DISPLAYING PMGRAM TO HELP OPTIMIZE INSTRUMENTAL PARAMETEIB 139 am. PT. CONT’D. O O 0000 000N000 8 0 CALL CHAIN( ’SETUP’) GO TO I EPIBCNJ'T IS USED TO OBTAIN EPR SPECTRA CALL CHAIN( ’EPRSCN’) TI-A.I"T IS A TI- DATA ACQUISITION PROGRAM CALL CRAIN( ’TI.A’) GO TO I DATIDNJ'T IS ANOTHER mNITOR LIKE EPRMN." WED FOR DATA MANIPULATION CALL CHAIN( ’ DATHIN' I 4640 IASCII CODE FOR Y IN A1 FORMAT + CIA END 140 FILE NAME: EPRSCN." FILE NAME: arm." IR ACQUISITION PMGRAM THIS PROGRAM IS D-IGNED TO RECORD AN ER SPECTRUM. YOU DEFINE THE RESOLUTION OF THE MAGNETIC FIELD (UP TO 1024 POINTS/SPECTRUM) AND THE NUMBER OF INTEGRATIONS AT EACH POINT. THE MAGNETIC FIELD IS INCREMENTED USING THE X-AXIS OUTPUT ON THE FMNT PANEL OI" THE PDPB/E. AFTER THE FIELD HAS BEEN INCREMENTED. SUBROUTINE ERRSUB IS CALLED TO DETERMINE WHEN THE MAGNETIC FIELD HAS REACHED ITS CORRECT FIELD STRENGHT. N POINTS ARE TAKEN AND AVERAGED. THE DATA ARE STORED AS DOUBLE PRECISSION INTEGERS IN THE LAST TWO THIRDS OF YDATA( I) IN COMIDN. THE NUMBERS ARE FLOATED BEFORE RETURNING TO EPRINJN. TIHTIHY G. KELLY OCT. 16. 1975 MDIFI- MAY 30. I976 000000000000000000000 COMI'DN IADRES.NUMINC. IDATPT. NSCAN. IDELAY.NPTS. ITIm.NAVE.BASE. ISIGMA. IKINSP. YDATA.TIMPPT. NBASE. ISTART. INCREM DIMENSION YDATA( 1024) C C C DEFINE ABSOLUTE IDCATIONS C S ABSYM XPONTR 130 /PAGE 0 ADDRESS 8 ABSYM POINTR. I31 /PAGE 0 ADDRESS 8 ABSYM STORE I7 /AUTO INDEXING REGISTER S ABSYM ISWRD 16 IAUTO INDEXING REGISTER C C START C 200 FORMATT ’NUMBER OF POINTS/SPECTUM (MAX 8 1024) ’. I5) 8 TAD (7000 /INITIALIZE MAGNET-5WLTS DILX S CLA CLL S TAD DATFLD /SETUP RETURN TO CORRECT DATA FIELD. 8 AND {7707 8 RD!" /OR DATA FIELD INTO BITS 6-8 OF AC S DCA DAT‘FLD 10 READ( 1 .200)NPT‘S C C DETERMINE THE NW TO BE 08. TO INCREMENT THE MAGNETIC FIELD. C S TAD \NPTS /SIZE OF INCREMENT 8 102va S DCA DIVISR S CAM /0 TO AC. 0 TO III S TAD (2000 /1024 - 10 BIT CONVERTER 8 ML IAC TO m, 0 TO AC 8 DVI SDIVISR.0 S /TmT FOR DIVIDE ERROR S JI‘B ERR2 S SNA ICHECK FOR REMAINDER S JMP NOREM INO REMAINDER C C TO COVER THE ENTIRE MAGNETIC FIELD RANGE SET ON THE FIELDIAL. C ITISNECUSARYTOCHOWEANPTSTHATISAPONEROFZ. C WRITEt 1 . 100) 100 FORMATC 'SELEC'T A NEW ”TE-POW“ OF 2') 141 EPIBCNJ'T. CONT“ D GO TO 10 SRO-I. I‘HA CLA S DCA INCR READ( 1.300) NAVE FORMAT( ’NUMBER OF AVERAG-/POINT ’ . 15) TAD \NPT‘S C IA DCA \ I DATPT TAD \NAVE DCA IAVE TAD (2216 DCA \IADRES TAD \IADRES DCA STORE TAD \IDATPT DCA NUMPT‘S TAD XCOUNT JMP FIELD INCFLD.TAD MAGFLD INCR FIELD. DILX DCA MAGFLD DCA HIGH DCA LOW ILOAD m INTO AC /SET UP POINTS COUNTER /IDATPT IS -NPTS /SET UP AVERAGE COUNTER /IAVE IS -NAVE /ADDRFSS OF LAST 2/3 OF YDAT( I) /GET ADDRESS POINTER FROM COMMN /GET -NPTS FROM COMIDN M” X CHANNEL DAC TO CONTML /MAGNTIC FIELD /INITIALIZE LOCATIONS HIGH AND LOW 'CAuERIISUB-MAGNETNULLDETECTIONPROGRAM CALL ERRSUB CLA CLL ADCL TAD (3 ADLM TAD IAVE DCA NUMAVE SGE'I'H)R.ADST SABC. ADSK JMP Am ADRB ADSE SKP JPB ERR SMA JMP NOTHEG TAD LOW DCA LON SZL JMP TOOMP CLA CMA TAD HIGH DCA HIGH JMP TCOPH’ OTNEG.TAD LOW DCA LOW SZL ISZ HIGH , 7000 CLL ISZ NUMAVE JMP GETIDR 6211 TAD LOW IDCA STORE TAD HIGH IDCA STORE ATFLD,6201 ISZ NUMP'TS mmmmmm anomommmmwmmmmmmmmmmmmmum E mmmmmmmm mmmgmmmmmwmmmmmmmmm "8 /BE SURE AC IS ZEN) /CLEAR ADC FLAGSAND norm /LOAD MULTIPLEXER 3. CLEAR AC /GET -NAVE FMM COMIDN /SKIP ON A/D DONE /READ A/D BUFFER .CLEAR DONE FLAG /SKP ON ADC TIMING ERROR ICHECK FOR NEGITIVE NUMBER INO /CHECK FOR OVERFLOU /SIGN EXTEND THIRNJGH UPPER WRD /NUMBER IS MITIVE ICHECK FOR OVERFLOW /PLACED HERE TO NULLIFY ISZ /CHANGE TO DATA FIELD 1 /AUTO INDEX REGISTER /CHANGE TO DATA FIELD 0 /INCREMENT THE MAG FIELD? 142 EPRSCN. FT. CONT' D S JMP INCFLD /YEB CALL FLOTDB TIMPPT=0. CALL CHAIN( ’EPRIDN’) SCONVRT. 1000 SNUMAVE.0 SNUMPTS.0 SIAVE. 0 SXCOUNT. 7000 /-5 VOLTS FOR 10 BIT DAC S INCR. 0 SMAGFLD.0 /INCREMENTED NUMBER FOR MAG FIELD SADCEN. 0000 8 HIGH. 0 8 L011. 0 S ERR. 0 VRITE¢ 1 .500) 500 ' FORMAT( 1X.'A/D TIMING ERROR‘) CALL EXIT S ERR2. 0 WRITE( I .600) 600 FORMAT( 'DIVIDE ERROR’) CALL EXIT END 143 000000000000000000000000000 mmmmmmmmmgmmnoommmnmnnn F ILE NAIE: DATA. F'I' SUBROUTINE DATA FILE NAME: DATA." ESR ACQUISITION PROGRAM-KINETIC DATA THIS SUBMUTINE NE WRITTEN TO PERFORM DATA ACQUISITION UNDER THE CONTmL OF THE DKB-EP PROGRAMMABLE REAL-TIME CLOCK. WHEN THIS ROUTINE IS CALLED. IT TAKES NUMPTS (VARIABLE NAIE) NUMBER OF POINTS AT A TIME INTERVAL SET BY THE CLOCK. THE MINIMUM TIME BETWEEN POINTS IS 25 USFB USING THE ADO-EA A/D CONVERTER.C THE DATA POINTS ARE DEPIBITED IN THE ARRAY YDATA( 1024) IN COMMN. ALL INDEXES AND PARAMETERS MUST BE SETUP BY THE CALLING PMGRAM. ALL ARGUMENT‘S ARE PASSED THROUGH COMMN SPECIAL LOADING INSTRUCTIONS! THIS SUBROUTINE MUST BE LOADED INTO FIELD ZERO. THIS IS REQUIRED BECAUSE THERE MAY NOT BE TIME TO READTHEDATAFIELDANDSETUPARETURNTOTHAT DATA FIELD BEFORE THE A/D CONVERTER HAS THE FIRST DATA POINT: THEREFORE. THE ROUTINE ASSUME THAT IT IS IN FIELD 0. PROGRAMMER: TIIMYIHY G. KELLY AUG. 8. 1976 COMEDN IADRES.NUMINC. IDATT’T. NSCAN. IDELAY.NPTS. IT'IE. RAVE. BASE. ISIGMA. IKINSP.YDATA.TIMPPT.NBASE. ISTART. INCREM DIMENSION YDATA( 1024) ABSOLUTE SYML DEFINITION ABSYM NUMPTS 17‘! /PAGE 0 ADDRESS ABSYM XDOUNT 175 /PAGE 0 ADDRESS ABSYM XPON'IH I30 /PAGE 0 ADDRESS ABSYM POINTR I7 /AUTO INDEX REGISTER ABSYM YPOINT I6 /AUTO INDEX REGISTER ENTRY POINT 6211 /CHANGE TO DATA FIELD 1 CLA CLL MILADSK /SKIP ON A/D DONE JMP GET'H)R ADRB IREAD A/D BUFFER. CLEAR DONE FLAG ADSE ISKIP ON A/D ERMR FLAG SKP JIB ERR IDCA POINTR /DEPOSIT DATA IN FIELD 1 I82 NUMPT‘S /HAVE I TAKEN ALL THE DATA POINTS? JMP GETTDR /NO. GET'MRI 6201 /RETURN TO DATA FIELD 0 RETURN SERR. 0 URITE( 1 .500) 500 FORMAT( 1X. 'A/D TIMING ERMR') CALL EXIT END 144 000000000000 mmmmmmmmmmmmmmommmmwmonomuwmwmoonn SUBBOUT‘INE ERRSUB FILE NAHE: ERRSUB.” PROGRAIIIIER: TIIIYIHY G. DATE 3 24-JUN-76 FILE RAE! mun.” KELLY THIS PROGRAII VAS WRITTEN AS A SUBMUTINE TO DETERHINE HAGNETIC FIELD NULL. THE ERROR SIGNAL 1. SAIIPLED AT HUTIPLEXER INPUT I AT INTERVALS SET BY THE ERMR SIGNAL AT SCHIIIT'I' TRIGGER O. 1” POINTS ARE AVERAGED. NULL IS DIXILARED WHEN 3 CONSECUTIVE AVERAGES ARE WITHIN +/-I. COIIIIJN IADRES.NUIIINC. IDATPT.NSCAN. IDELAY.NPTS. ITIIIE.NAVE.FELDRG. ISCAN'ITI. IKI NSP . YDATA. TIIIPPT. NBASE DIIIENSION YDATA( 1024) .NUII( 10) ABSOLUTE SYMOL DEF INITIONS ABSYM CHKFLG 134 ABSYII NUNPT'S 133 ABSYN XCOUNT 132 ABSYM XPONTR I31 ABSYR POINTR I. ABSYM TIIIEPT 1 1 IPAGE O ADDRESS-WED FOR DIRECT ADDRESSING /PAGE 0 ADDRESS /PAGE 0 ADDRESS /PAGE 0 ADDRESS /AUTO INDEX REGISTER IAUTO INDEX REGISTWI /CLEAIB CIDCK ENABLE REGISTER /SET BIT ZERO OF CLOCK ENABLE REGISTER /1NITIALIZE CLOCK FLAG /CLEAR ALL A/D FLA“ /I‘1ULTIPLEXER I /LOAD NULTIPLEXER FROH AGO-II AND CLEAR AC /SET ADC FOR CLOCK EXTERNAL START /LOAD ENABLE AND CLEAR AC /INITIALIZE INDEX I /INCREIIENT I BY 1 /IS IT WITHIN BUFFER SIZE OF 5? /YES IT IS /NO. SET ['1 IDIVSORiNPTS TO BE AVERAGE!) /NUNAVE /SET DELAY TIRE OF 1 UIEC 145 ERIBUB.FT. CONT’D. TAD CLEENB CLOE CLA CLL vm gunman . CLSK JMP OVER2 TAD (3777 CLZE CLA CLL ADC. 182 cm SEP JIIP CONTIN ADSK €30UbgquflbmODQODOUDQUDQODGUDQUDQODOUDQ 3 E "U :3 s D / L. gammfimmmmwmmmm S 5% E E 2 NO. 182 mm mmmmm "I E 3 /IDAD CIDCK ENABLE WRD INTO AC ISET AC INTO CLOCK ENABLE REGISTER ISTOP CLOCK AND CLEAR CLK /EXT. START ENABLE /THIS SELF RETARTING OPTION IS NEEDED /TO OVERCOIIE INADAQUICIES IN DEC /HARDWARE /SKIP ON A/D DONE /READ A/D BUFFER .CLEAR DONE FLAG /SKIP ON A/D ERROR FLAG ICONVERT I. BIT 2'8 CORLIIIENT TO BINARY IDOUBLE PRECIIIION ADD /INCREPIENT HIGH cam-m BITS /HAVE I AVERAGED ENOUGH POINTS? /NO /CLEAR LINK-RUST BE CLEAR BHORE DIVISION /AC TO m ll‘NJST SIGNIFICANT BITS /DIVIDE /DIVISOR' IO. /T'EST FOR DIVIDE ERROR /AC TO m. in TO AC /SET AC3-1 /I-18O? INO /AVERA(E INST BE WITHIN +/-1 /-1 IAC NAS'I OR 0. NEETS REQUIRMTS /OUTSIDE OF LIHITS /SET' AC3! /DECREIIENT J /NUST HAVE 3 AVERA. EQUAL /CONVERT IO BIT 2'S COH’LIIIENT TO BINARY /OVERFI.0V+PDDE 00+: HHZ+EXI'. START /AND CLOCK INHIBIT+EVENT1 146 ERISUB. FT. CONT‘D. SADCENB. 0200 /ADC ENABLE EXTERNAL START S ERR. 0 WRITER 1 , 500) 500 FORIIAT( 1X. ’A/D TIIIING ERROR’ ) CALL EXIT SERR2. 0 WRITER 1 .600) 600 FORIIATT 1X. 'DIVIDE ERROR’ ) CALL EXIT END 147 FILE NAIE: FLOTDB.” SURMUTINE FLOTDB §EE TAD DCA TAD DCA gas: 9 E 58§§ DCA TAD SNA J RP B$§§E§E IAC mmmmmmmmmwwwmmmmmmmmgmmummmmmmmnnnmmmmoono 00000000000000 8 a. I. SCA 0 — b nun: F! B TAD PRECISION BITS 1-8 8 BITS 9-35 CONN IADRES.NUHINC. IDATPT. NSCAN. IDELAY.NPTS. ITII.NAVE. BASE. ISIGNA. IKINSP. YDATA.TIPIPPT. NBASEISTART. INCREH DIMENSION YDATA(1024) ( 2 16 XCOUNT ( 22 16 XPONTR DATFLD DATFLD I TAD XPONTH ITAD XPONTH TEHPI TEHPI (4000 WORDI WORDI CLA P081 TEPIPI TEHPI (27 (200 SUBROUTINE FLOTDB." THIS PMGRAI‘I WAS WRITTEN TO FLOAT DOUBLE PRECISION 1mm. USING THE EXTENDED ARTHPIETIC ELEIIENT (EAE). THE DOUBLE INTEGERSARESTORED INTHELAST2/3OFTHE ARRAY YDATA(1024). THIS ROUTINE REIDVES THE DOUBLE PRECISION INTEGER. FLOATS IT. AND STORES IT AS 3 WORDS STARTING AT THE FRONT OF THE ARRAY. REAL DATA ON THE B/E IS STORED IN 3 Home (36 BITS). BIT 0 I SIGN BIT (0 IS PwITIVE. 1 IS NEGATIVE) EXPONENT + 200 OCTAL ' NANTIISA ABSOLUTE SYMBOL DEF IN ITIONS 132 /PAGE 0 ADDRES I? /AUTOINDEX REGISTER 16 /AUTOINDEX REGISTER 131 /FAGE 0 ADDRESS /SET UP LOOP IADDRESS OF YDATA IN comm-1 /ADDRESS OF 1m IN COM-1 /OR DATA FIELD INTO AC ISETUP DATA FIELD FOR RETURN /CHANGE TO DATA FIELD I IAC TO no.0 TO AC /NOR!IALIZE-EAE INSTRUCTION /GET SIGN OF mum /Cm FOR NEGATIVE NUHBER /YES. IT IS NEGATIVE /CREATE 2’s COHPIIIENT OF THE DOUBLE /PRF£ISSION INTEGER /CIIECK FOR A CARRY FMII CIA OF LOW WRD llNCREHENT HIGH WRD fSTEP COUNTER CONTAINS NUIIBER OF SHIFTS IEIIPONENT IS 27(OCTAL) - RUBBER OF SHIFTS 148 FLOTDB.". GONT’ D. AND (377 CLL RTLzRAL TAD WORD! DCA WORD! 'I‘AD 'I'EIIPI AND (3400 RSV CLL RTR TAD WRDI 6211 IDCA XCOUNT 6201 TAD 'IENPI AND (377 RTLsflTL DCA HORDI SWP DCA TEIIPI CLL 082. TAD TEHPI AND (7400 new R'I'R TAD WORD! 6211 IDCA XIIOUNT 6201 TAD TEHPI AND (0377 RTLzllTL 6211 gmammmmmmmmmmm mammmgmgummmgmmmmmmm IEXPONENT IS STORED AS EXPONENT‘P200(8) /IIAKE SURE LINK = O IVORDI NON RAS SIGN AND EXPONENT IGET FIRST 3 BITS OF HANTISSA IHAKE SURE LINK=O /AU'IOINDEX REG. /GET RENAINING 8 BITS FRO}! WRDI /LEFT JUSTIFY BITS /AG TO m. 1!: TO AG /GET' 4 BITS TO COIIPLETE WORD 2 /HWE BITS 0-3 INTO MITIONS O-II /GET REMAINING 8 BITS ILEFT JUS'I‘IFY 149 0QUOQQ0000000000000000000000000000000000 100 101 130 160 201 500 600 700 900 1000 1100 FILE NAIE: STORE." SUBMUTINE STORE(H)DE) FILE NAIIE: STORE." SUBROUTINE TO OUTPUT A DATA FILE TO STORAGE DEVICE IN C.G.E.CO. STANDARD FILE FORRAT. FIIST m CRARACTEIE ARE CONTROL CRARACT‘EIB. COMMENT READER (FILE NAIIE. DATE. YOUR NAIIE) INTEGER DATA ( I5 FORIIAT) READ DATA (E13.3 FORIIAT) ASCII DATA (A6 FORIIAT) END DATA FILE DATA ARE WRITTEN WITHOUT THE X DATA POINTS IN ALL 11mm FORRATS IN ORDER TO SAVE SPACE ON THE OUTPUT DEVICE. THE X DATA POINTS WILL BE ADDED TO THE DATA FILE ON THE PDP “/40 WHEN IT IS READ IN USING DAT‘IDN.LDA UNDER DOS/BATON. EEEEE” AN 'AS’ DATA FILE REQUIRES THE LEAST SPACE ON THE STORAGE DEVICE AND IS BY FAR THE FASTEST FORII OF OUTPUT'. HOWEVER. THIS FILE FORRAT HAS THE DISADVANTAGE OF HAVING TO BE TRANSLATED BEFORE YOU CAN READ THE VALUE OF THE POINTS. THIS PROGRAII IS WED IN 1110 muss. IDDES II OPEN DATA FILE AND RETURN TO CALLING PMGRAII '2 OPEN DATA FILE AND OUTPUT DATA PROGRAM: TIWIHY G. KELLY JAN. 9.1976 IDDIFIED JULY 29.1976 DEFINITIONS: OPDEF RDF 62I0 lREAD DATA FIELD INTO AC BITS 6-3 OPDEF ITAD 1400 /INDIRECT TAD TO FOOL SABR OPDEF BSW 7002 /BYTE SNAP IN AC ABSYII DIN)” 0133 IPAGE 0 momma ABSYR POINTH I0 /AU'IO INDEXING REGISTER CONMN IADRES.NUIIINC. IDATPT. NSCAN. IDELAY. NPTS. ITIIIE.NAVE. BASE. ISIGIIA. IKI NSP. YDATA.TIIIPPT. NBASE. ISTART. INCRER DIIIENS ION YDATA( 1024) . IYNAIE( B) FORMATI 'ENTER COINIENT TEXT’I'OONTROL G TO END'/) FORIIA'N ’WRIT'E ENABLE ’A4l) FORRATIAI) FORMAT( 'IID' .A6.2I2, II.8A2.7I3.FIN.6.2IU) FORPIA'I‘t A2) FORHATT 'ENTER FILE NAME '.A6) FORIIAT( ‘ENTER YOUR NAllEz ’ .8A2) FORRATT 'OUTPUT DEVICE: ’M) FORPIAT( ’ IN' 15) FORMAT? 'ED') FORIIAT( ‘RD'EIU.8) FORIIATT 'AS'AG) FORMAT(’I 3 IN. 2 = RD, 3 ' AS: 'II) FORRAT( '8 FIELDIAL SET (KG): 'FIO.3) FORIIAT( ’3 RANGE (KG): 'F10.3) ENTRY POINT READI I .000)DEVICE 150 STONE.FT. CONT" D. QQQQQMQQ 000 0C50f5 Inuunwanmanmanmlam IDWGDQUHDO MUHDU MUDWUDQUD WRITE( I . 101) DEVICE READ( 1.2011FNAIIE CALL OOPEN1 DEVICE. FNARE) READ( 1.300) IYNAIIE WRITE HEADER ON OUTPUT DEVICE Ill) '0 IDAY‘O 1YR80 TAD (7666 DCA DMNYR RDF IREAD DATA FIELD TO SETUP RETURN TAD DAT'FLD DCA DATFLD 6211 /CHANGE TO DATA FIELD 1 ITAD DTDNYR /DA'I'E IS IN LOCATION 17666 ATFLD.6201 /RETURN TO DATA FIELD N DCA AG TAD AG AND (0007 /LAST DIGIT OF YEAR 18 IN BITS 9-11 DCA \IYR TAD AG RTRIRAR AND (37 /DAY 18 IN BITS 4-8 DCA \IDAY TAD AG RTLsRT'LsRAL AND (17 mm 18 IN BITS 0-0 DCA \IID WRITE(4. 130) FNAIE. 1m. IDAY. IYR. IYNARE. IDATPT.NSCAN. IDELAY.NPTS. 1 ITIHE.NAVE. IKINSP.TIRPPT.NUNING.NBASE WRITE CONTENT ON OUTPUT DEVICE IN C.G.E.GO. STANDARD FILE FORE-CONTROL CHARACTERS ARE 8 . READ( 1 ,1000)SET READ( 1 . 1100) RANGE WRITE(4.1000)SET WRITING. I 100)RANGE WRITE( I. 100) TAD CRZIU DCA AG NWLINE.TAD (7340 /: 'GOIIENT (IN A2 FORHAT) DCA \ICHAR WRITE(4. 160) ICHAR. TAD (7671 /LINE LENGTH OF 72 CHARACTEIU DCA LINE /SET UP A LINE COUNT /CORRESPONDING TO WIDTH OF TTY GETOHR /GET CHARACTER FRO]! T'TY TAD \ICHAR ICHARAC'I‘ER HIST BE SIX BIT ASCII /FOR FORTRN FORMAT c. i BSW AND (7700 TAD (60 DCA \ICHAR WRITE(4.140)IGRAR. ISZ LINE JIIP cannon TAD CROW /CR 18 WRITTEN A8 A SPACE DCA \ICHAR WRITE(4. 140) ICHAR TAD CR213 JPS PUNCH TAD LF212 /LINE FEED JIB PUNCH TAD AG SZA CLA an» ONLY AFTER GONTTIDL G JNP NWLINE 151 STORE. FT. CONT' D. 136 @000 meflbmflbgfi0t5flflbwQDQIIQODQODCHDUDQODO .33 GO TO(250. 136)MDE READ( 1.900) IA GO TO( 190.200.210) IA SABR SUBROUTINE TO GET CHARACTER FMN TT'Y GE'ICHR.0 CLA CLL NSF /TEST TT'Y FMG JIIP TT'Y2 KRB /READ CHARACTER AND CLEAR FLAG TLS /ECHO GRARACETR DCA \ICHAR TAD \ICHAR TAD CIA213 ITEST IF CR SNA CLA JPIP CRLF /YIB. CHARACTER WAS CR TAD \ICHAR TAD CIACG /TFST IF CONTIN”. G SZA CLA JIIP I GETOHR DCA AG /YES. CHARACTER WAS CONTROL G JPIP CRLF SABR SUBMUTINE TO TYPE CHARACTER ON TTY 0 T‘SF /SK1P IF TT'Y FLAG =1 JIIP TT'YI T'LS ILOAD T'I'Y BUFFER AND PUNCH CHARACTER. CLA CLL JMP I PUNCH SGIA215.7563 /CR 0215 PLUS CIA SCIA212.7566 /LINE FEED 0212 PLUS CIA SCRZIU. SLF212. SLINE. S AG. SCIACG. 0215 /CR 0212 /LINE FEED 0 o . 7571 /CONTROL G PLUS CIA SCW.“§0 /SPACE IN AI FORMAT 8802306.2304 ISD IN A2 FORBAT C — '0 0 ‘0 a 00000 nanom— §§§ OUTPUT DATA IN I5 FORIIAT. FIRST Tm CHARACTEIS ARE ’IN' = INTEGER FILE CONTINUE DO 195 I=I.NPTS IYDATA3 YDATA( I) WRITE( 4.500) IYDATA JI‘IP \220 ’RD' OUTPUT FILE. Y IS WRITTEN TO THE OUTPUT DEVICE IN E15.B FORl'lAT.200 CONTINUE WRITE(4.700) (YDATA( I) . I: 1.NPTS) JIIP \220 'AS' DATA FILE. Y VALUES WRITTEN AS AN ASCII CHARACTER IN A6 FORMAT. CONTINUE DO 215 I'I.NPTS \‘RITE14.800)YDATA( I) WRITE(4.600) CALL OCLOSE RETURN END ,152 000000000000000000000000000000 000 nun-u u-O mmmmmmmmmmmmmmigoon § FILE NAIR: FETCH." SUBROUTINE FETCH(H)DE) FILE NAHE: FETCH.” SUDROUTINE TO READ A DATA FILE mu STORAGE DEVICE mum IN C.G.E.CO. STANDARD FILE FORIIAT. FIRST THO CHARACTEIB ARE CONTROL CHARACTERS. 3 3 COHHENT HD 3 HEADER (FILE NAHE. DATE. YOUR NAHE) IN 1' INTEGER DATA (15 FORI‘IAT) RD 3 REAL DATA (EI5.8 FORMAT) AS '3 ASCII DATA ( A2 FORMAT) DK ' DATA FOR KINETICS EF 3 RETURN TO CALLING PROGRAH ED 3 END DATA FILE THIS PROGRAH WILL OPERATE IN FOUR mums. THE CALLING PROGRAH RUST SPECIFY THE IDDE OF OPERATION RY PASSING A VARIABLE TO SUBMUTINE FETCH.FT. MOE: 1 ASK FOR FILENEIE AND OPEN FILE 2READDATAUFTIL ITMANHOR- 3 FETCH ONLY SELECTED POINTS PM]! THE DATA FILE 4 FETCH ONLY SELECTED DECAY CURVE PROGRAIDIER! TIINJTHY G. KELLY JAN. 9.1976 mum- AUG 20,1976 OPDEF RSV 7002 lBYTE SWAP IN AC COIDNJN IADRES.NUHINC. IDATPT, NSCAN. IDELAY.NPT‘S. ITIIE.NAVE.RASE. ISIGHA. IKINSP.YDATA.TIHPPT.NBASE. ISTART. INGREDIENT DIHENSION YDATA( 1024) , ICHAR( 72) . IYNAHE( 8) ENTRY POINT J‘O GO TO( 1.20. I 1.. 1301mm: ICOH=-I READ( 1 .200)DEVICE FORMAT( ’ INPUT DEVICE: 'AQ) READ( 1.300) FNAIE FORPIATT ’ENTER FILE NAIIE ’ .A6) CALL IOPEN( DEVICE,FNAHE) READ 2 CONTRIL CHARACTEIB FMN T'HE INPUT FILE READ(4.400) ISVICH. FORHAT(A2) TAD \ISVICH TAD (6776 m FOR Im ’HD’ 8 HEADER SNA CLA JHP HEAD /YF8. READ HEADER TAD \ISWICH TAD(0“0 MFORLETTEIB'O’=COHENT SNA CLA JHP \50 IYES. READ com TAD \ISWICH TAD (6662 /TEST FOR LET'IEIB ’IN' 3 INTEGER FILE SNA CLA JNP \60 IYFS. READ INTmER DAWN-I5 FORHAT TAD \ISWICH TAD (5576 /TEST FOR LETTERS ‘RD' 8 REAL DATA FILE 153 FETCH. FT. CONT’D. mmmmmummmmmuwwmmmumm SNA CLA JHP \70 TAD \Iswlcn TAD (76!!!! SEA CLA JHP \80 TAD \ISWICH TAD (7365 SNA CLA JHP \30 TAD \ISWICI! TAD (7272 SNA CLA JMP \40 TAD \1 SWICH TAD (7276 SNA CLA JHP ENDF IL /YFB. READ REAL DATUH—EI5.8 FORIIAT /TEST FOR LETIEIB 'AS‘ I ASCII FILE /YFB. READ ASCII DATUN-A6 FORMAT /TEST FOR LETTERS ’DK' 8 KINETIC DATA m FOR LET'I'EIB ’EF’ ' END IOF DATA FILE /RE'I'URN TO CALLING PMGRAR /TEST FOR LETTERS 'ED' 3 END OF /DATA FILE IYES. RETURN TO CALLING 154 0000000000000000 000§§OQOQQO a 000%!) mung _ 0 unmummanmunguomaog 8 FILE NAI‘IE: TINEDA. FT FILE NAIIE: TIIIEDA.FT ESR ACQUISITION PROGRAH TIMEDA RECORDS THE VARYING DATA AT ONE RAGNETIC FIELD VALUE. YOU ENTER THE THE INTERVAL AND THE NUHBER OF AVERAGES. THE MAXIHUN DATA RATE. DETERHINED BY THE A/D CONVERTER. IS 60 KHZ; HOWEVER. T'HIS PROGRAH HAS BEEN WRITTEN TO USE THE FREE TIDE AVAILABLE. DATA ARE AVERAGED AS DOUBLE PRECISSION INTEGEIG AND ARE CONVERTED TO FLOATING POINT FORMAT BEFORE RETURNING 'IO EPRHON. PROGRAHIIER: TIIDTHY G. KELLY OCT. 16. I975 COPIHON IADRES. IXADIB. IDATPT. NSCAN. IDELAY.NI’T‘S. ITIE.NAVE.FELDII3. ISCANTI‘I. IKINSP. YDATA. TIHPPT DIHENS ION YDATA( 1026) ABSYII NUI'IPTS I76 /PAGE 0 ADDRESS ABSYII MOUNT 175 /PAGE 0 ADDRESS ABSYII XPONTR 130 /PAGE 0 ADDRESS ABSYM POIN'I‘R 17 lAU'IO INDEX REGISTER ABSYII YPOINT 16 lAU'I‘O INDEX REGISTER FORIIAT('TII‘IE BETWEEN POINTS IN SEC (F10.6) '.F10.6) FORI‘1AT('NUI‘IBER OF POINTS (MAX 3 1024) '.I5) ENTRY POINT READ( 1. 1001TIRE TINPPT‘3TIIE READ( 1.200)NPTS READ( 1.300) NAVE TAD (7000 DILX CLA CLL READ( 1.310) INCREII FORMATUSIZE OF INCREHENT': '15) FORNA'N 'NUI‘IBER OF AVERAG ' .15) TAD \INCREH DCA XPONT‘R CONST = 0.4095E—2 D0 10 I=I.5 IF(TIIIE-CONST)11. 11. 10 CONST 3 CONS‘I‘JIO. N 3 7-1 XTINE 3 T1m10.88N TEST 3 HIRE-2048. IF(’I'I:‘ST)20.25.25 ITIIIE = IFIXUITIIIE) GO TO 30 ITIHE = IFIX(TEST) TAD (4000 TAD \ITIHE DCA \ITINE CONTINUE TAD \N ISELECT CIDCK FREQUENCY RT'L: RTL: RTL DCA \N TAD \ITIIIE CIA DCA \IDELAY TAD CLOCEN IADD CL! ENABLE ”RD 155 TI-A. FT CONT‘ D. AND (7077 TAD \N DCA CLOCEN TAD (216 DCA \IADRIS DCA \ IDATPT TAD \NAVE DCA \NSCAN TAD \ I ADRFS DCA PO I NTR TAD \ IDATPT TAD \NSCAN CLA CLL TAD \IDELAY CLAB CLA CLL ADCL ADLN CLA CLL TAD ADCEN ADLE TAD CLOCEN CLOE CLA CLL CLSA 6211 FLASH CLSK JIIP OVER TAD (7000 TAD XPONTR DILX CLA CLL SGETmR.ADSK JIIP GETTDR ADRB ADSE SKP J18 ERR IDCA POINT'R ISZ NUI‘IPTS JIIP GETTDR ISZ NUIBCA S HI..T 6201 TAD \IADRES DCA POINT‘R TAD (2216 DCA YPOINT TAD \IDATPT DCA NUHPTS 6211 SCONTIN. ITAD POINTR SNA mmwmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmwwm O .5 mmmmmmmmnuwmmmmmmw JHP POS IDCA YPOINT CI‘IA IDCA YPOINT JI‘IP TST IDCA YPOINT IDCA YPOINT ISZ NUIIPTS mgmmmmmm f1 IST'RIP PREVIOIB CLOCK FRMUENCY IADDCLKFREQ. TOCLKENABLEWRD xmnms OF IYDATA IN comm -1 /SET UP POIN'IS COUNTER llET UP AVERAGE COUNTER /GET ADDRBS POINTER FRON COMEDN IGET NUHBER OF DATA POINTS FROII MN IGET NUHBER 0F SCANS FROII COM ICLEAIB CLOCK ENABLE REGISTER /GET DELAY FROII CORINTN /AC TO CLOCK BUFFER ICLEAR ALL A/D FLAGS ILOAD HULTIPLEXER FROH ACE-11 AND CLEAR AC /LOAD A/D ENABLE WORD INTO AC /LOAD A/D ENABLE REG. AND CLEAR AC /LOAD CLOCK ENABLE WORD INTO AC ISET AC INTO CLOCK ENABLE REGISTHI /CHANGE TO DATA FIELD I /FLASH LAN? MT FOR OVERFLOW DUE TO SCHINIT TRIGGER ISKIP ON AID DONE /READ A/D BUFFER .CLEAR DONE FLAG ISKIP ON A/D ERMR FLAG IDEPOSIT DATA IN FIELD I /HAVE I TAKEN ALL THE DATA POINTS? /NO . GETTDRI /CHANGE TO DATA FIELD 0 IADDRESS OF DATA IN com— 1 IADDRES OF DOUBLE PRMISSION “3RD IIN COPONJN-I IPOINTS COUNTER /CHANGE TO DATA FIELD 1 ITEST FOR NEGATIVE NUMBER INEG. POINT NWT BE SIGN EIU‘ENDED /P(BITIVE NUMBER SIGN EXTENDED 156 TINEDA.FT CONT’ D. S JMP CONTIN S 6201 CALL FLOTDB CALL CRAIN( ’EPRmN’) 8 BLT S ADCENJDZOO /A/D ENABLE WORD-EXTERNAL START S CONVRT. 1m SNUI‘BCA.O SCLOCEN.5661 /mD 01+IHRZ+OVERFLON START A/D-PCLOCK S /INRIBIT+EVENT1 S ERR. O WRITE( 1,500) 500 FORHATT IX. ’A/D TIEING ERROR’ ) CALL EXIT END 157 BIBLIOGRAPHY 158 [AL68a] [AL68b] [AL68c] [AL68d] [AL68e] [AL68f] [Al-689] [AM72] [ARGO] [AT68a] [AT68b] [AT68c] [AT70a] [AT70b] BIBLIOGRAPHY A R.S. Alger, “Electron Paramagnetic Resonance: Techniques and Applications”, lnterscienoe, New York, 1968, p 71. RS. Alger, “Electron Paramagnetic Resonance: Techniques and Applications”, lnterscienoe, New York, 1968, p 82. RS. Alger, “Electron Paramagnetic Resonance: Techniques and Applications”, lnterscienoe, New York, 1968, pp 106-123. R.S. Alger, “Electron Paramagnetic Resonance: Techniques and Applications”, lnterscienoe, New York, 1968, p 109. RS. Alger, “Electron Paramagnetic Resonance: Techniques and Applications", lnterscienoe, New York, 1968, p 1520. RS. Alger, “Electron Paramagnetic Resonance: Techniques and Applications”, lnterscienoe, New York, 1968, Deprieqx, Laboratory reference 29, p 150. RS. Alger, “Electron Paramagnetic Resonance: Techniques and Applications”, lnterscienoe, New York, 1968, p 149. American Institute of Physics Handbook, Third Ed., McGraw-Hill, 1 972, p 5-1 05. Argonne National Laboratory, Batavia, Illinois, Trifunca. P.W. Atkins, K.A. McLauchlan, and AF. Simpson, Chemical Communications 179 (1968). P.W. Atkins, K.A. McLauchlan, and AF. Simpson, Nature 219, 927 (1 968). P.W. Atkins, K.A. McLauchlan, and AF. Simpson, Molecular Spectroscopy, 1 77 (1 968). P.W. Atkins, K.A. McLauchlan, and AF. Simpson, Journal Physics E: Scientific Instruments 3, 547 (1970). P.W. Atkins, LC. Buchanan, R.C. Curd, K.A. McLauchlan, and AF. Simpson, Chemical Communications 513 (1970). 159 [A171] [A173] [A1 05] [A1 09] [BA64] [BE67] [BE69] [8039] [BU52] [CA59] [CA66] [CA75] [CA77] [0577] [CHEN] P.W. Atkins, R.C. Curd, K.A. McLauchlan, and AF. Simpson, Chemical Physics Letters 8, 55 (1971). P.W. Atkins, K.A. McLauchlan, and P.W. Percival, Molecular Physics 25, 281 (1973). Design number A-105, Instrument Service, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824. Design number A-109, Instrument Service, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824. B K. Bar-Eli and TR. Tuttle, Journal of Physics 40, 2508 (1964). T.J. Bennett, R.C. Smith and T.H. Wilmshrst, Chemical Communications 513 (1967). T.J. Bennett, R.C. Smith and T.H. Wilmshrst, Journal Physics E: Scientific Instruments 2, 393 (1969). JR. Bolton and J.T. Warden, Publication 39, Photochemistry Unit, Chemistry Department, University of W. Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada. J.H. Burgess and RM Brown, Review of Science Instruments 23, 334 (1952). C A. Carrington, R. Dravnieks, and M.C.R. Symons, Journal Chemistry Society 1959, 947 (1959). J.G. Calvert and J.N. Pitts Jr., “Photochemistry”, John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1966, p 783. R. Catterall, and P. Edwards, Journal Physical Chemistry 79, 3010 (1975) R. Catterall, J. Slater and M.O.R. Symons, Canadian Journal of Chemistry 55, 1979 (1975). J.M. Ceraso, P.B. Smith, J.S. Landers and J.L. Dye, Journal Physical Chemistry 81, 760 (1977). K.M. Chen, Department of Electrical Engineering, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, personal communications. 160 [C064] A.R. Cook, L.M. Matarrese and JS Wells, Review of Scientific Instruments 35, 114 (1964). [COWN] J. Cowen, Physics Department, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, measured Q of Micro Now and Varian cavities. [CU46] R.L. Cummerow and D. Halliday, Physical Review 70, 433 (1946). [C162] CEM 162 Laboratory Manual, Quantitative Analysis, Experiment #6, Department of Chemistry, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824. D [DA79] M.G. DaGue, Ph.D. Thesis, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, 1979, pp 25-37. [DEC] Digital Equipment Corporation, Maynard, Mass. 01754. [DE64] R. Dewald and J.L. Dye, Journal of Physical Chemistry, 68, 121 (1964). [D057] J.L. Down, J. Lewis, B. Moore and G. Wilkinson, Proceeding of Chemical Society 1 957, 209 (1957). [D059] J.L. Down, J. Lewis, B. Moore and G. Wilkinson, Journal Chemical Society 3767 (1959). [DY59] J.L. Dye and RR. Dewald, Journal Physical Chemistry 68, 135 (1964). [DY71] J.L. Dye, M.T. Lok, F.J. Tehan, R.B Coolan, N. Papadakis, J.M Caraso, and MG. Debacker, Ber. Bunsenges Physical Chemistry 75, 659 (1971). {DY73] J.L. Dye in “Electrons in Fluids,\", J. Jortner and CR. Kestner, Ed., Springer-Verlag, W. Berlin, 1973, page 77. E [EL63] J. Eloranta and H. Lischitz, Journal of Chemical Physics 38, 2214 (1963). [EN76] C.G. Enke and TA. Nieman, Analytical Chemistry 48(8), A705 (1 976). 161 [FE57] [FE63] [FE64] [FE73] [Fl67] [FR76] [F R77] [GA70] [GA71] [GEOS] [GI26] [G L70] [GL73] [GO71] [G072] F G. Feher, Bell System Technical Journal 36, 447 (1957). R.W. Fessenden and RH. Schuler, Journal of Chemical Physics 39, 2147 (1963). R.W. Fessenden, Journal of Physical Chemistry 68, 1508 (1964). R.W. Fessenden, Journal of Chemical Physics 58, 2489 (1973). E.W. Firth and D.J.E. Ingram, Journal of Scientific Instmments, 4, 821 (1967). A. Friedenberg and H. Levanon, Chemical Physics Letters 41, 84 (1976). A. Friedenberg and H. Levanon, Journal of Physical Chemistry 81, 766 (1977). G A. Gaathon and M. Ottolenghi, Israeli Journal of Chemistry 8, 165 (1970) G. Gabor and K. Bar-Eli, Journal of Physical Chemistry 75, 286 ( 1971). GEOSYS, A Computer System for the Description and Analysis of Spatial Data, written by R.l. Wittick, Computer Institute for Social Science Research, 1974. GE. Gibson and TE. Phipps, Journal of American Chemical Society 48, 312 (1926). SH. Glarum and J.H. Marshall, Journal of Chemical Physics 52, 5555 (1970). SH. Glarum, Review of Scientific Instruments 44, 752 (1973). I.B. Goldberg and A.J. Bard, Journal of Physical Chemistry 75, 3281 (1971). T.E. Gough and F .W. Grossman, Journal of Magnetic Resonance 7, 24 (1972). 162 [(3074] [6075] [GO76a] [GO76b] [G0766] [(3077] [GR73] [HAHN] [HA56] [HA62] [HA70] [HA72] [HEAT] [HI68] [H069] l.B. Goldberg and A.J. Bard, Journal of Physical Chemistry 78, 290 (1 974). l.B. Goldberg, H.R.Crowe, R.S. Carpenter ll, Journal of Magnetic Resonance 18, 84 (1975). LE. Goldberg, H.R.Crowe, G.S. Wilson, R.S. Glass, Journal Physical Chemistry 80, 988 (1976). I.B. Goldberg and H.R.Crowe, Journal Physical Chemistry 80, 2407 (1976) LE. Goldberg and H.R.Crowe, Journal Physical Chemistry 80, 2603 (1976). l.B. Goldberg, H.R.Crowe and K0. Christe, Journal Physical Chemistry 17, 3189 (1978). K. Gruber, J. Forrer, e. Aopfi and H.H. Gunthards, Journal Physics E: Scientific Instruments 6, 666 (1973). H Controller design B.K. Hahn; Interface design T.G. Kelly, Department of Chemistry, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824. C.G. Hatchard and CA. Parker, Proceedings of the Royal Society (London), A235, 518 (1956). D. Halliday and R. Resniek, “Physics: Part II”, John \Niley and Sons, New York, 1962, p 853. E.J. Hamilton, Jr., E. Wood, and GS. Hammond, Review of Scientific Instruments 41, 452 (1970). B.J. Hales and JR. Bolton, Journal of the American Chemical Society 94, 3314 (1972). Heath Company, Benton Harbor, MI. R. Hirasawa, T. Mukaibe, H. Hasegawa, Y. Kanada and T. Maruyama, Review of Scientific Instruments 39, 95 (1968]. JD. Hoeschele, Ph.D. Thesis, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824 1969. 163 [H072] [H076] [H077] [H873] [HU68] [HU70] [HU74] [HY63] [KL71] [KL72] [LA59] [LA76] [LA77] J.G. Holbrook, T.H. Wilmshurst, and RR. Simmons, Journal Physics E: Scientific Instruments 5, 555 )1972). F.J. Holler, T.G. Kelly, T.V. Atkinson, C.G. Enke, American Laboratory 8, 9 (1976). RE. Hoguet, Chief Engineer, Micro-Now Instrument Company, Chicago, Ill, personal communication. E.S.P. His, L. Fabes, and JR. Bolton, Review of Scientific Instruments 44, 197 (1973). l. Hurley, T.R. Tuttle, Jr., S.R. Golden, Journal of Chemical Physics 48, 2918 (1968). D. Huppert and K.H. Bar-Eli, Journal of Physical Chemistry 74, 3285 (1970). M. Huisjen and JS Hyde, Review of Scientific Instruments 45,669 (1974) J.S. Hyde, “Principles of EPR Instrumentation”, 7‘“ Annual NMR- EPR Varian Workshop, Varian Associates Instrument Division, Palo Alto, CA 1963. K J.G. Kloosterboer, L.J. Giling, R.P.H. Rettschnick, J.D.W. VanVoorst, Chemical Physics Letters 8, 462 (1971). J.G. Kloosterboer, P. Jost, O.H. Grtfilfith, “Computers in Chemical and Biochemical Research”, Volume 1, CE. Klopfenstein and CL Wilkins, Editors, Academic Press, New York, 1972, p 175. L J. Lambe and R. Ager, Review of Scientific Instruments 30, 599 (1959). Jacques Lacoste, Ph.D. Thesis, Universite Des Sciences Et Techniques Du Langnedoc, France, 1976, pp 23-29. T. Last and CG. Enke, Analytical Chemistry 49, 19 (1977). 164 [LAST] [L072] [MA69] [MNOW] [MULP] [PA53] [PHOT] [PI60] [PIP8] [P067a] [P067b] [P067c] [PO67d] [SA64] Interface design by TA. Last, Department of Chemistry, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824. M.T. Lok, F.J. Tehan, J.L. Dye, Journal of Physical Chemistry 76, 2975 (1972). M Matalon, S. Golden, M. Ottolenghi, Journal of Physical Chemistry 73, 3098 (1969). Micro-Now Instruments Company, Inc., Chicago, Ill, 60646, Sales literature. Program MULPLT, written by T.V. Atkinson, Department of Chemistry, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824. P C.A. Parker, Proceedings of the Royal Society (London) A220, 104 (1953) Photochemical Research Associates, University of W. Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada, James Bolton, Pres. L.H. Piette and WC. Landgraf, Journal Chemical Physics 32, 1107 (1960) Program PIP8 written by T.V. Atkinson, Department of Chemistry, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824. C. Poole, “Electron Spin Resonance, A Comprehensive Treatise on Experimental Techniques”, lnterscienoe, New York, 1967, p 259. C. Poole, “Electron Spin Resonance, A Comprehensive Treatise on Experimental Techniques”, lnterscienoe, New York, 1967, p 343. C. Poole, “Electron Spin Resonance, A Comprehensive Treatise on Experimental Techniques”, lnterscienoe, New York, 1967, p 413. C. Poole, “Electron Spin Resonance, A Comprehensive Treatise on Experimental Techniques”, lnterscienoe, New York, 1967, p 321. S A. Savitzky and J.J.E. Golay, Analytical Chemistry 36, 1627 (1964). 165 [SA77] [SE73] [SE77] [SM64] [SM68] [SM71] [SM77] [8068] [$774] [TE74] [V063] [WA61 ] [WA75] [WA76] F.P.Sargent, Atomic Energy of Canada, Ltd., Whiteshell Nuclear Research Establishment, Pinawa, Manitoba, Canada, personal communication. T.O. Seim, T.B. Mele, and S. Pyrdz, Journal of Magnetic Resonance 9, 175 (1973). WA. Seddon, J.W. Fletcher, F .C. Sopchyshyn, and R. Catterall, Canadian Journal of Chemistry 55, 3356 ( 1977). G.W. Smith, Journal Applied Physics 35, 1217 (1964). B. Smaller, J.R. Remko and EC. Avery, Journal of Chemical Physics 48, 5174 (1968). B. Smaller, E.C. Avery and JR. Remko, Journal of Chemical Physics 55, 2414 (1971). GE. Smith, R.E. Blankenship and MP. Klein, Review of Scientific Instruments 48, 282 (1977). J. Sohma, t. Komatsu and Y. Kanada, Japanese Journal of Applied Physics 7, 298 (1968). R.L. Stoll, “The Analysis of Eddy Currents”, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1974. T F.J. Tehan, B.L. Barnett and J.L. Dye, Journal of American Chemical Society 96, 7203 (1974). V K.D. Vos and J.L. Dye, Journal of American Chemical Society 38, 2033 (1963). W H. Wahlquist, Journal of Chemical Physics 35, 1708 (1961). J.K.S. Wan, H.M. Vyas, S.K. Wong and B.B.Adeleke, Journal of American Chemical Society 97, 1385 (1975). J.T. Warden and JR. Bolton, Review of Scientific Instruments 47, 201(1976) 166 [WA77] [Wl531 [WE63] [WE72] [WE72b] [WE72c] [Wl55] [W072] [XENO] [ZA45] J.K.S. Wan, Queens University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada, personal communications. T.H. Wilmshurst, T.J. Bennett and RC. Smith, Proceedings of the Royal Society A302, 305 (1968). W. Weyl, Ann. Physik. 121, 601 (1863). J.E. Wertz and JR. Bolton, “Electron Spin Resonance-Elementary Theory and Practical Applications”, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1972, p 24. J.E. Wertz and JR. Bolton, “Electron Spin Resonance-Elementary Theory and Practical Applications”, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1972, p 451. J.E. Wertz and JR. Bolton, “Electron Spin Resonance-Elementary Theory and Practical Applications”, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1972, pp 452-454. R.P. \Mnch, “Electricity and Magnetism”, Prentice-Hall, 1955, p 506. S.K. Wong and J.K.S. Wan, Journal of American Chemical Society 94, 7197 (1972). X Xenon Corporation, Medford, MA, Manufacturer’s literature. Z E. Zavoisky, Journal of Physics USSR 9, 211 (1945). 167 I“[llj‘1ljlj’l‘lj[ljlfll[)1]