I7- 7!; A his?! "‘wh‘rj-u l 0 0 r1 ’. Tcdpfiq (1..“ d—--‘.—. “I. b .w um..- U ":1: Arr-:3“; .-...a. V3... he] This is to certify that the dissertation entitled "Using the Barbieri—Remiddi Lowest— Order Equation for Calculating the Decay Rate and the Energy Shift of Positronium" presented by Alireza Abbasabadi has been accepted towards fulfillment of the requirements for PhoDo degreein PhYSiCS 2%“ Z/ @45— ‘ a Major professor / Date 9/7/55- MS U i: an Affirmative Action/Equal Opportunity Institution 0-12771 MSU ‘ LIBRARIES “ BETURNING MATERIALS: Place in book drop to remove this checkout from your record. FINES will be charged if book is returned after the date stamped below. USING THE BARBIERI-REMIDDI LOWEST-ORDER EQUATION FOR CALCULATING THE DECAY RATE AND THE ENERGY SHIFT OF POSITRONIUM BY Alireza Abbasabadi A THESIS Submitted to Michigan State University in Partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Department of Physics and Astronomy 1985 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I am most grateful to my advisor, Professor Wayne W. Repko, for suggesting the topic of this dissertation and for his patient guidance and support throughout this work. Without his constant help and encouragement, this thesis would not have become a reality. I also extend my thanks to Professor Julius Kovacs for his support during my graduate study years at Michigan State. Thanks also to Dr. Alberto Devoto, who gave valuable comments and assisted me in the learning of the SCHOONSCHIP program. I would like to thank the entire staff at Physics and Astronomy Department for making this department a pleasant place to work. Thanks also to Debra Robbins for the typing of this manuscript. I thank the National Science Foundation and Michigan State University for their financial support. Many thanks to all the people who made my stay in East Lansing an enjoyable experience, and to my fellow graduate students, and especially to my friend Hossein Zoheidi. Finally, I wish to thank my fiance, Patty, for run" love, understanding and patience throughtout the writing of this thesis. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Tables List of Figures Chapter 1. Chapter 2. Chapter 3. Chapter A. Introduction Solving the Bethe-Salpeter Equation for Positronium Contribution of One-Photon-Annihilation Channel to the Energy-shift of the Ground-State of Orthopositronium in the First-Order Perturbation Theory Contribution 6E1 Contribution 6E2 Contribution 6E3 Contribution 6E“ Contribution 6E5 Contribution 5E6 Contribution 6E7 Summary of the Calculation of the Total Energy-Shift of the Orthopositronium Ground-State due to the One-Photon-Annihilation Channel Decay Rate of the Ground-State of Parapositronium in the First-Order vi vii 10 20 22 23 28 36 38 AA 56 58 61 Perturbation Theory A. Contribution M B. Contribution M C. Contribution M D. Contribution M E. Contribution M F. Contribution M6 G. Contribution M H. Contribution M 8 I. Summary of the Calculation of the Total Invariant Amplitude and the Decay Rate of the Parapositronium Ground-State Chapter 5. Summary and Conclusion Appendices Appendix Appendix Appendix Appendix Appendix Appendix Evaluation of an Integral related to the Contribution 6E3 Evaluation of an Integral related to the Contribution 6E1 Proof of an Identity Evaluation of an Integral related to the Contribution M1 Calculation of a Trace related to Mu Evaluation of some Integrals related to the Contribution M2 iv 65 67 72 73 80 8A 90 95 95 99 102 107 110 113 116 122 Appendix G. Evaluation of some Integrals 130 related to the Contribution MA List of References 138 Table 1. Table 2. LIST OF TABLES Summary of the Calculation of the Energy-Shift Summary of the Calculations of the Amplitudes and the Decay Rate vi 6O 98 Figure Figure Figure Figure Figure Figure Figure Figure 1. 2. 3. LIST OF FIGURES Kernel 6K, where the Coulomb-like kernel 20 KC is given by (2.31). Lines with a dash indicate inverse propagators. Energy shifts 6E's, where GC and Kc 22 are given by (2.29) and (2.31), respectively. (a) Definition of quantity Auv' (b) Graphical 2A representation of "uv' (c) Equality which is correct up to the 0(a) correction. Gc is given in (2.29) and k = (2n, 8). A Contributions 6E3a and 6E3b, where R 28 .) is given by (2.30), and k = (2K, 0). Diagram which is related to 6E3b. R is 33 defined in (2.30). . . a b Contributions 6E“ and 6E“ . 36 The identity which is the direct result 37 of the equation (3D.2). Contributions 6E 3and 6E b. Lines with 39 5 5 a dash through them indicate inverse propagators. vii Figure 9. Figure Figure Figure Figure Figure Figure Figure Figure 10. 11. 12. 13. 1A. 15. 16. 17. Contributions 6E6a and 6E6b. Vertex correction for 6E6a and 6E6b. Equalities which hold up to the 0(a) corrections, where D00 is the instantaneous Coulomb interaction (see (3C.2A).) Equalities which are correct up to the 0(a); they are the result of equation (3F.25). Equalities which are correct up to leading order, i.e. 0(1). Equalities which are correct up to the 0(a) correction. Equality which is the result of comparing Figure 2(a) with Figure 2(g). Graphical representation of the total energy-shift, correct up to the order a correction. Kernel 6K, where the Coulomb-like kernel K0 is given by (2.31). Lines with a dash indicate viii A5 H5 A7 53 54 55 56 59 61 Figure Figure Figure Figure Figure Figure Figure Figure Figure Figure 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 2M. 25. 26. 270 inverse propagators. The only (GK') which contributes, up to the 0(a) correction. Quantity n. up to the 0(a) correction. Contributions to the ivariant decay amplitude, where G0, KC and C are given by (2.29), (2.31) and (A.5) respectively. Lines with a dash indicate inverse propagators. Diagram related to M2, where k = (2K, 8), It: (19;) and k2 =0. Diagram related to M3, where k = (2K, 8) and h= (191:). Contributions Mua and Mub. Diagram related to MA a Diagram related to Mub. Contributions M5a and MSb. The identity which is the direct result ix 62 63 6A 68 72 7A 714 77 81 81 Figure 28. Figure 29. Figure 30. of the relation (3D.2). Contributions M6a and M6b, where R 85 and C are given by (2.30) and (A.5) respectively. Line with a dash indicates inverse propagator. . a b Contributions M7 and M7 . 90 Total invariant decay amplitude, correct up 96 to the 0(a) correction. Line with a dash through it indicates inverse propagator, and the normalization constant C is given by (A.5). Chapter 1 Introduction Positronium, which consists of one electron and one positron, is a pure quantum electrodynamic (QED) bound system. It is experimentally accessible and therefore its study is another sensitive test of QED. It also can be used to test any two-body relativistic equation for the case in which the interaction is purely electromagnetic. Since positronium consists of a particle and an antiparticle, which can annihilate and create photons, the lifetime of positronium is very short, 10-.10 sec. If we want to get a gross structure of positronium, we may compare it with hydrogen atom. In this case, since electron and positron have equal masses, the reduced mass will be-% me. Using this reduced mass, we find out that the Bohr radius of positronium atom is twice that of hydrogen atom, or the ionization energy is half of the hydrogen atom and etc. The spin of positronium is sum of the spin of electron and spin of positron. Therefore it can have spin 0 (singlet state) or spin 1 (triplet state). Positronium with spin 0 is called parapositronium (p-Ps), and with spin 1 is called orthopositronium (O-Ps). We use 28+1 the notation L where J, L and S are total angular momentum, J, orbital angular momentum and spin of the system respectively; and beside they are related by the relation 3 = E + S. By using this notation, the states of positronium can be grouped as ls 3s - 1P 3P 3P 3 1. 1. 0’ P and so on. 1’ 2 We can show [1] the charge parity (charge conjugate) of positronium has the eigenvalues (_)2+s, and for photon it has the eigenvalue (-). Therefore, for positronium decay into photons, we must have the following selection rule (since C,1flmacharge conjugation, is a good quantum number) 1+ (-> S = (-)“ (1.1) where,riis thexummer of photons into which the positronium can decay. Therefore in ground-state (l = 0), parapositronium (s = 0) can decay into an even number of photons, and orthopositronium (s = 1) can decay into an odd number of photons. Since from conservation of energy-momentum, the decay of orthopositronium intc> a single photon is forbidden, the minimum number of photons that cmthopositronium, in ground-state (2 = 0), can decay into is three photons. For parapositronium, in ground-state (2 = 0), the minimum number of photons that it can decay into is two photons. The calculated decay rate, in lowest-order approximation, for p-Ps (parapositronium) is [2] 5 2 _ Fth(p-Ps -+ 2Y) = gr-(E¥%J = 8.0325 x 109 sec 1 , (1.2) while the measured value is [3] _ _ 9 -1 rexp(p Ps) - (7.99“ i .011) x 10 sec. . (1.3) The calculated decay rate, in lowest-order approximatitni, for o-Ps (orthopositronium) is [A] 2 2 2 6 mc rth(o-Ps -+ 3Y) §;-(n - 9) a (-fr9 7.2112 x 106 sec-1 , (1.u) while the measured value is [3] 6 -1 rexp(o Ps) - (7.051 i .005) x 10 sec. , (1.5) (for a review of experimental advances in positronium see the review by Rich [5] and for new measurement of decay rates see [3], and for new development in QED see [6].) The accuracy of the measurement of p-Ps, relation (1.3), is not high enough to test the radiative corrections to the decay rate (1.2). While for the o-Ps decay rate measurement, relation (1.5), its accuracy is high enough to test the radiative corrections to the decay rate (1.“). In fact the decay rates, including the radiative corrections, are 2 I‘th(p-Ps) = I'O(p-Ps)[1 - (5 - 13‘) + In a'.‘ + 0(a2)]. (1.6a) dIQ uflk) Q 2 1 _ g _ -2 -1 ‘ rth(o Ps) ro(o Ps)[1 " (10.266 i .011) 3 a In a . + O{ (g)2}] 9 (1.73) wherelkxp-Ps), the lowest-order decay rate of p-Ps is given by (1.2), and FO(o-Ps), the lowest-order decay rate of o-Ps is given by (1.“); the 0(a) correction to p-Ps was done by Harris and Brown [7]. and the 0(a) correction to o-Ps (the value that we quoted in (1.7a)) and the order 02 In a 1 corrections, to both para-and orthopositronium, are given by Caswell and Lepage [8]. In relations (1.6a) and (1.7a), if we assume that the coefficients of 02 and (%)2 terms are unity, then we find Fth(p-Ps) = (7.98M i .001) x 109 sec—1 , (1.6b) (7.0386 1 .0002) x 106 sec“1 . (1.7b) Fth(o-Ps) For the decay rate of p-Ps, comparison of (1.3) with (1.6b) shows that the theory and experiment are in agreement, but the accuracy of measurement is not high enough to check the coefficients of a and 0:2 In 01 1 terms. In fact if we write equation (1.6a), up to the order a, in the following form rth(p-Ps) = Fo(p~Ps)(1-ka) , (1.8) experimental result (1.6b) gives the following possible range of values for k k 2:.66 i .2 . (1.9) We note that the calculated value of k 2 k=l(5-1'——)z.806 (1.10) 1! ll . is one of the possible values in (1.9). But since the range of the values of k:h1(fl.9) is not narrow enough, we do not consider the agreement between the measured and calculated values of the decay rate of p-Ps as a sufficient criterion for the test of the radiative corrections. For the decay rate of o-Ps, comparison of (1.5) with (1.7b) shows that the agreement between theory and experiment is not satisfactory, and in fact there is a discrepancy. To resolve the unsatisfactory agreement between the I‘th(o-Ps) and Pexp(o-Ps), Gidley et al. [3] initiated more measurements of the o-Ps decay rate. Up to now all measured values of I‘(o-Ps) have been above the calculated one, therefore one may think that, maybe, there are other channels available for the o-Ps to decay to. I]: is suggested [9] that the following process could be responsible (at least partially) for the discrepancy between theory and experiment 0 o-Ps + a + Y, (1.11) vfliere, a0 is a neutral particle of mass ma < 2me O Amaldi et al. [10] measured the decay rate of the above process. For the mass ma varying from 100 to 900 kev, they found the following range of upper limits for the ratio of decay rates of the above mode to the 3X mode 6 6 - 1 x 10’ . (1.12) P (o-Ps + aOY) F (o-Ps + 3Y) R = ~ 5 x 10” Therefore, their result shows that the process (1.11) can not resolve the discrepancy between rexp (o-Ps) and rth (o-Ps). There is another quantity of interest, the ground-state hyperfine splitting of positronium, AB = E (s = 1) - E (s = O), the energy difference between the s = O and s = 1 levels with n = 1. The measured value of this quantity is [11] AEexp (hfs) = 203.3885 i .0010 GHZ , (1.13) while the theoretical value is chau 7 a 32 AEth(hfS) =‘——F—— [g - F'C‘g + 2 ln 2) + own 9 5...; 3 Q + c: ,‘ Q n) L—J a 203.u00 GHZ. (1.14) The first two terms were calculated by Karplus and Klein [122], and calculaticnicu'the 02 1n 0-1 term started by Fulton, Owen and Repko [13], and completed by Caswell and Lepage [1N], and Bodwin and Yennie [15]. Contribution of 02 term to the hyperfine splitting, if we assume its coefficient is unity, is of order .005 GHZ. Therefore in order to have a meaningful comparison of theoretical result, relation (1.1“), with experimental result, relation (1.13), we need to calculate the 0 (a2) correction to the hyperfine splitting. As expressed by Buchmuller and Remiddi [16], most methods which proposed and used in the past - for calculating the radiative shifts of energy levels of positronium - work only1n31x>the order 02 In a 1 correction and in practice they can not find a2 correction to the AE, relation (1.1M). In Chapter 2, we discuss the method that Barbieri auui Remiddi [17] introduced for solving the positronium problem, which in principle can be used for finding decay rate or energy splitting of positronium up to the any desired order in a. Throughout our work, in subsequent Chapters, we use the Coulomb gauge. The reason, beside the others, is that in covariant gauge, for positronium, there are some spurious terms, such as o (013) and 3 o (a In 0-1) corrections to the energy levels, which appear in some Feynman diagrams (for a discussion of these problems and the cancellation of these contributions see [18]), while hi(knuomb gauge we do not have such spurious terms. In Chapter 3, after introducing a perturbative expansion for «energy levels [16], we calculate the energy shift, GB, of the (nethopositronium (6E = E - 2K, where E is the ground-state energy of 2 o-Ps and K = (1 - 9—H)1/2)' We consider those contributions which come from the one-photon-annihilation channel and contribute up to the first-order of perturbation theory (up to the o (a) correction). The energy shift 6E that we find is ——-—(1-————-— (1.15) which agrees with the result of Karplus and Klein [12]. The interesting point is that we find the finite value for (SE, without performing the wave-function and vertex renormalization subtractions (for the regularization and renormalization of QED in Coulomb gauge see [19] and [20]). In Chapter N,an%er writing down the perturbed wave-function for parapositronium, in terms of the zeroth-order wave-function, we calculate the decay rate of p-Ps. We consider those decays which contribute up to the first-order of perturbation theory (up to the 0(a) correction). They are the decays of p-Ps into two photons. The decay rate that we obtain is r (p-Ps + 2 1()= ”Sh“ [1 - § (5 - 17)] . (1.16) which agrees with the result of Harris and Brown [7]. Here also we find the result (1.16), without performing the wave-function and vertex renormatization subtractions. Throughoutcnu'work, we use the notation and conventions of BJorken and Drell [21]. We also use the natural units 11 = c = 1, and take the electron mass me = 1. For regularizatitni, we employ the method of dimensional regularization [22]. 10 Chapter 2 Solving the Bethe-Salpeter Equation for Positronium [17], [23] The formulation of the bound-state problem in QED, which is given by the relativistic Bethe-Salpeter (BS) equation [2w], although from theoretical point of view is complete, it lacks a tractable and systematic computation procedure. In practice, in order to solve BS equation, which is an integral equation, one specifies a lowest-order equation, then by using this equation as a. starting point, one does a perturbative calculation on it. In general this lowest-order equation has a kinetic and an interaction term. The interaction term is responsible for the boundrstates and supposedly is the largest part of the full BS kernel“ Ihn the limit of low-momenta these two terms should reduce to the kinetic energy and the Coulomb potential of the Schrgdinger equation, and also it is advisable that in the limit of high-momenta the kinetic term describes the free propagation of the electron and positron. In the following, we discuss a lowest-order equation which has the above properties and can be solved exactly. The BS equation for the Green function G is [2“] duk (20) G(P.p.q)=GO(P.p.q)+f “GO(P.p.k) 11 x f 'u x (p, k, k') 0 (p, k', q), (2.1) (20) and the lowest-order equation which is proposed by Barbieri and Remiddi [17] is GC (P. p. q) = GO (P. p) [(21r)Ll 0” (p-q) A + fd p'u Kc (P, p, p') Gc (P, p', q)]. (2.2) (20) First we specify GO and Kc' In the C.M. frame where P = (2w, 8) (2w is the total energy of positronium and 2w-2 is the binding energy), GO and K0 are chosen as 1 1 (1)[ 1 1(2) _ ' L— _ _ + ’ p + wYO 1 + 15 p wYO 1 18 GO (W, P) = [ v (203) and Kc (w. E. a) = - i) (E. 3) R (w. 5) v0 (5 - 3) R (w. 3). (2.u) where + + 1 + + + + (1) A (p. q) = 16 E E N N [(Np + p - Y) (1 + YO) (Nq + q - 1)] ’ p q p q ’ + -> -> + (T) x [(Nq + q - v) (1 - YO) (Np + p . 1)] , (2.5) and + 8(W.D)=——"—.E /E + w p and V0 is the scalar Coulomb 12 potential Np = Ep + 1 , (2.6) e2 ‘3; ) (2.7) In the above relations, (1) stands for electron line and (2) stands for positron line. By specifying Kc and GO, as we did, (nus finds the exact solution to the equation (2.2) for the Green function Gc' In C.M. frame this solution has the following form 0C (w, p, q) = 00 (w, p) [(2101l 0 “(p-q) + 1 R (w. B) “c (w. E. a) R (w. a) A (S. a) 00 (w. 6)]. (2.8) where, the scalar function HC + + HC (w, p. q) = x 115 - 3'2 p - [1/(uw2 — u)] (E: - we) (E: - we) (1 - p)2} . 1P - 3| is 2 + An a v f d p p- 1 v 0 1 (2.9) 13 where (2.10) c u .4 u mun We note that He has pole at w = K (from now on we assume w < K) 2 H0 (w, E, 5) + 32 1' Y 1 , (2.11) K (52 + Y2) (a2 + Y2) w - K W + K where K = ./1- Y , (2.12) and it corresponds to the ground-state energy. In equation (2.9), if we replace the real integral with contour integral [25] i inv 2 Sin v e f0 d p (° - .) 9 (2.13) f; d p (. . .) + where the path 0 begins at p = 1 + oi and terminates at p = 1 - oi, after encircling the origin within thexunite circle, then we find that He has poles at 1H |-< NM n = 1, 2, 3,... , (2.14) which 2 K w _ K . (2.15) where summation is over all degenerate states (for ground-state (2 = o) degeneracy is only due to spin). Using (2.15), one can find wo's, inns zeroth-order Barbieri-Remiddi wave-functions. For orthopositronium ground-state (s = 1, I = 0) i n a $0 (p) = +2 (P (K - E ) {E + K P P ¢ + Y2)2 0 Ep Np (Np-p-Y)(1+Yo)£ (m) + _+.-> Y (Np p Y) X _ , _ _ . 9 (PO + K Ep + ls) (p0 K + Ep IE) (2.16) and its "conjugate" transpose 15 -T -i n a 111 (p)-—- 0 2 22 E 0 (15+)) 0 pr -+.+ _ A(m).-+ _+.-) (Np p 1) (1 1p) g 1 (Np p 1) (p0 + K - Ep + is) (pO - K + Ep - 16) X . (2.17) (m) where ¢o and spin 1 polarization vectors g are 3 (9—'1/2. 5(0) = (O, O, 1) , 5(i) ='l~ (1, i i, 0) . (2.18) ¢o g 80 /§ For parapositronium ground-state (s = o, l = o) _ 2 i w a 111 (p) - p2 (K - E ) VB + K ¢ P P O (P + Y2)2 o E P (E +Y -E~i¥)¥ p o o 5 X _. _ _ 9 (2019) (p0 + K Ep + 15) (p0 K + ED is) and its "conjugate" transpose -T a 2 1 n a (K ' Ep) 'Ep + K v p 0 o (p2 + Y2)2 0 Ep -> + (Ep-YO+p-YYO)Y5 (PO + K " Ep + 18) (p0 ' K + Ep - is) X (2.20) In the above relations we defined 80 by the following relation i=7 1) Y . (2.21) One may use (2.15) for finding an integral equation for me. This equation can be found by taking the residuum of (2.2) at w = K A _ d p' 1 1 WC (P) ' GO (K: P) f (2w)“ K0 (K: P, P ) $0 (P ) . (2022) We can show that the following normalization condition for these wave-functions is satisfied f (211)}; (21:11“ 5° W 53%; [GO-1 (P' p' Q) — Kc (P. p. 0)]1o (q) =1 , (2.23) where P=(2K,‘6),.<=(1-12)”2,1=% . (2.211) In order to use the perturbation theory around w = K, one needs the following quantity (in Chapters 3 and A we will use this quantity) . . Z w w 0p(1<)a[0p(w) -—1———‘-’-———9-] 2K w - K w + K ' (2°25) which is finite (pole contribution is subtracted), and can be found by using (2.8) and (2.9) 17 A 0p (K, p, q) = (211)ll a” (p - q) 0p (K. p) + 1R (K, S) R (K. a) x 00 (K. p) 1 (E. 6) 0p (n. q) fip (K. p. q) . (2.26) where He is finite (pmfle contribution is subtracted). and is given A in [23]. Up to the first order of perturbation theoryy lap can be written as . 2 2 1 1 5 -2Y -2Y H (K. p. q) = 1.. {-+ -[-+ ———————-+ c A B 2 +2 + Y2 52 + Y2 Y2 -Y2 Y2 p + K - E + is p - K + E - 16 q + K - E + 16 2 1 -Y 28 - A - B + - K + E - 1 + f dp p 2 ]} 9 (2.27) QO 0 Ap + B (1 - p) where + + 2 1 +2 2 +2 2 A=|p-q| ,B=——2-(p+Y)(q+Y). (2.28) In the course of calculations of positronium decay rate or energy splitting, in some Feynman diagrams we divide the contribution of each diagram into two parts. One which comes from the first term in CC, equation (2.26), and the other which comes from the second term in 60' Let's write (2.26) in the following form 18 A Gc (K. p. q) = (21r)Ll 6" (p - 0) GO (K. p) + R (K. p. q) . (2.29) A where R is a (K. p. q) = 1 R (K. E) R (K. 3) Go (K. p) 1 (E. E) x GO (K, q) HC (K, p, q) . (2.30) Beside R, there is another quantity that we always refer to, it is KC (K, E, a), which is Kc (w, B, a) at w = K, or from (2.A) Kp (K. 5. a1 = -1 x (S. 5) R (K. 5) v0 (6 - 3) R (K. E) . (2.31) There are some remarks that we should mention. In 1952, Salpeter [26] derived an equation which is the approximate version of the BS equation and has the properties which we mentioned at the beginning of the present Chapter; but the exact analytic solution of this equation is not known. This equation and its improved version which was given by Cung et a1. [27], before 1978 had been the starting point of nearly all perturbative calculations for the positronium and muonium. In 1978, the year that Barbieri and Remiddi [17] proposed their lowest-order equation, Caswell and Lepage [1A] also proposed an equation which is essentially equivalent to the Barbieri-Remiddi equation. It is also necessary to note that the Dirac equation, for a system which consists of an electron in an external Coulomb 19 potential, can be solved exactly and it gives the correct energy levels up to the order a“ (fine structure) [28]. One may think that the Dirac equation is a good lowest-order equation to start with; but this is not correct. The Dirac equation for an electron in an external Coulomb potential can be obtained from the BS equation, by considering the interaction kernel as a sum of the all irreducible crossed ladder graphs in the limit of infinite mass of positmmi [17]. In fact it is an equation for one fermion, not for two fermions. In any case, we do not need to demand that the lowest-order equation, by itself, should give the correct order “A for energy levels of positronium. As long as a lowest-order equation, by using a perturbation expansion, gives the correct energy levels in terms of the successive powers of a, it will be a good lowest-order equation to start with (explicit calculation shows that beside powers of a, we have also In a). 20 Chapter 3 Contribution of One-Photon-Annihilation Channel to the Energy-Shift of the Ground-State of Orthopositronium in the First-Order Perturbation Theory The energy-shift of the orthopositronium ground-state, in terms of the perturbation kernel 6K which is given by Barbieri and Remiddi [17]. can be written [16], up to the first order in perturbation theory as 1 as = (5K) + (6K 0p 6K) + (6K) (6K') + 0(6K3). (3.1) where 6K = K - KC, and is given graphically in Figure 1. 2:. a. (a)6K=- +>W<+§ T§++T v (1.1 E: —— Figure 1. Kernel 6K, where the Coulomb-like kernel K0 is given Kc 1---1 by (2.31).. Lines with a dash indicate inverse propagators. GC and K0 are given by equations (2.29) and (2.31), respectively. 21 131 (3.1), SE is defined as 6E = E - 2K where E is the ground- state energy, and prime stands for %:-%E , and (...) means the expectation value with respect to $0. For example, A A (0K') f dp GL1) 1 a mM——aummpflwwh Gm (2w)” (2“)A 0 2K 3K 0 where (110 is the zeroth-order Barbieri-Remiddi wave-function [17], which for the orthopositronium ground-state is given by the equation (2.16). Now using (3.1) and the graphical representation of 6K, Figure 1, one gets the energy-shift of the ground-state of orthopositronium, up to the first-order of perturbation theory. The contribution of one-photon-annihilation channel, up to the 0(a) correction, can be written as 7 6E = l 6Ei . (3.3) i where, GE's are represented graphically in Figure 2. (a) 16E1= (M) (b) 1032=(>-~@M<) (c) 16E 22 (d) 108“ = -2 xi ) (e) 1625 = A :j:i1gg::>~n-<::) (f) 16E6 A V) 7 2 <:::7“"7<:> :::i:f)> (g) 16E A Figure 2. EMergy shifts GE's, where Gc and K0 are given by (2.29) and (2.31), respectively. In the following sections we calculate the contributions GE's. A. Contribution (SE1 Using Figure 2(a), contribution 6E1 can be written as _ uv 16E1 - I d pp < -ieY w (p) > —155— (2“) AK 6“ - T x I——9—u- < 11 (q) (-ieY ) > . (311.1) 0 V (20) where < > stands for trace. The double integral factorized, and it is the case for all other diagrams. 23 Using (2.16) for wave-function $0 and performing pO integration (by virtue of Cauchy's theorem), and then performing the angular integrations, one gets dup f <-ieY w (p) > (2w)“ u o = ie¢ g“ 39-f” p d p / + K (2E + 1) . (3A.2) 0 3n 0 (52 + Y2).? Ep P P The integral in the right-hand side of (3A.2), up to the 0(a) correction, is performed in Appendix B; using that result, equation (8.11), we find u f d 9,, < - 1er 110 (p) > = mo 5“ 5(1+%) . (311.3) (2“) and since d“ -T d" * f qp < 1pc (q) (—1evp) > = [1' “PT < -1er 1110 (p) >] , (311.11) (2w) (2") equation (3A.1) gives (up to the 0(a) correction) ) . (3A.5) B. Contribution 6E2 For 6E Figure 2(b), let's first consider the “V (2H) (2H) u V x (2w)“ 6u(p - q) + iR(K, E)R(K, 3)AC(K, p, q)< - ieYuiS1(p +%k) .. 11(‘15. 5)1sl(q + -;-k)(-ier)iSZ(q - gmzfifi. S) x 182(p --%k)>] , (38.1) where 1 stands for electron and 2 for positron. Let's write (38.1) in the following form A = H + H' , (38.2) uv uv uv 25 where dnp 1 1 pr = -f A <-1erIS(p + Ek)(-leYv)lS(p - 2k>> , (38.3) (21!) and ion dup qu + + A -1 H' =-—— f R(K, p)R(K, q)H (K, p, q)(E E N N ) “V “ (2.)“ (2.)” ° p q p q .{[(p + 3.12- 1][(p - gk>2— 1][[li n“V(k) :1} 2 (2n) k2 k2 26 integrations (poles at p0 = K - ED and q0 = K - Eq give the most contribution) and keeping the lowest powers of E and 3, we get fie (K, B! a) 3 3 "' “ 0 Id Pd 8 . (33.5) uv (52 p Y2)(a2 + Y2) where E is c 2 2 - T * 1 1 5 AY AY H (K, p! Q) = “WGL— +'— L— --——————— —._______ C A B 2 +2 + Y2 +2 + Y2 + (699 28 - A - Bp ]} . (38.6) Ap + B (1 - p)2 and quantities A and B are given by (2.28). By scaling B + Y; and 5 + Y3, we note that He is of order g-and therefore IIL'W is of order 012; so we can ignore Him and up to the 0(a) correction (38.2) gets the following form A = 1T ’ (38.7) which is represented graphically in Figure 3(c). Now, by virtue of Figures 2(b) and 3(c), contribution 6E2 is u __ d p _ -i uv -i 16E - f p < ievap(p) >[——-n (k)-—§} 2 (21) k2 k 27 u x f-—9—3— < 1T (Q)(-ieY ) > . (38.8) (2")A o v where “uv' the vacuum polarization, can be found from (38.3), 1vhich up to the 0(a) is in a 8 2 Huv (k) = :7]; [(1 + '2‘) I'(-a) 1’ 3] (kn kv - k 81W) 9 k=(2.<,6), a=-’2—‘-2 (n+A), I‘(-a)+-1_-5-,a>o,(38.9) (for finding “uv’ by using the cut-off method, see [29]). Equation (3A.3) implies u _d_Il_ -1 a, = f(2")“ < 1ervo(p) > 5p (50 o) . (38.10) therefore (38.8) gets the following form u -121. a - £3. dp _ 1682 - 3p [(1 + 2)r( a) + 3] f (2“)” < 1evap(p) > . uv A x '13 f d q~ < 0T (q)(-ieY ) > . (38.11) k2 (2p)A o v which by comparing it with (3A.1), we find -o a 8 . 151:2 = -3—p- [(1 + -2-)1‘(-a)+ §](16E1) . (38.12) 28 Charge renormalization takes care of the first term, therefore by virtue of (3A.5) (1LI -8a 5E2 = '1"— (T1?) ’ (38.13) which is correct up to the 0(a) correction. C. Contribution 6E3 For 683, Figure 2(0). we decompose it as a b (SE = (SE + (SE C.1 where, the first term comes from the first term of Gp, equation A (2.29). and the second term comes from the second term cfi‘Chp; they are represented in Figure A. (a) 1083a= (W) N * = —-e¢o a “ /2'(1 + %) . 6 (b) 16E3 =2 .fl} ) * A Figure A. Contributions 6E3a and 683b, where R is given by (2.30), and k = (2K, 3). 29 We first calculate 6E3a. From Figure A(a) a =.:i *u .9 6E e105 ./2(1+p) 3 2 dup 1 1 x f (2")u < -1e Ap(p - 5k. 0 +-§k)vp(p) > . (30.2) where A11 is due to the vertex correction and can be found by the following relation A(p-—k.p+%1<)=i°‘ Jane—L—Ji . (30.3) where D =62 02 [(q+ p -%k)2 -1][(q+ (”£102 - 1] . (30.11) A = [_62890 _ qpqO + q0(quoo + qodpo)]pru-Y0 _ B“ ’ (3C.5) CD I - [“32890 - qpq° + q°(qu°o + q°épo)]Ydedep . (3C 6) 1 1 c=(n+¢-§u+1)1p(q+v+§k+1) . (30.7) Note that in the numerator of (3C.3). we added and subtracted the term 8“, the term which gives ultraviolet divergence. So we find A“ A (and J' dnq TEL) in 11 dimension (since it gives finite contribution) and Bu in n dimension. Therefore 30 +2 0 0 0 +2 A = - Y 0 Y - 0 + 0 Y + Y 0 — A p q p p d pd q d p 0 q 0 HA 0 qu 2 +2 2 2 2 + q q Yu 0 q oYu 2 qoq qup . (30.8) +2 2 +2 2 B = -2 2 - n + - n Y + Y + 2 Y . C. p ( ) q qu q [(3 )q p q p p qpqp O] (3 ‘9) From (3C.2) and equation (2.16) for we, we note that it is necessary to evaluate the quantity , where + + " -> + -> F = (Np - p - Y)(1 + Yo)€ - Y(Np - p o Y) . (30.10) By virtue of (3C.3), we obtain 10 u =-——— f d q u +-——— I 0 q-—E- . (30.11) H 3 D 3 D 1 An An where 2 u = -32(Ep + 1) q a . (30.12) 2 <30F> = [32 (2 - n) 620 p + 16 (3 - n) 32002 + 16 (n - 3) 5” + 16 quOZ] 5“ (30.13) In finding (3C.12) and (30.13) we used these arguments: from the structure of integrals in (3C.11) we notice that for the first integral the small values of q(q ~ Y) gives the 0(1) and 0(0) 31 contributions to (SE a, while the non-small values of q gives only 3 the 0(a) contribution. For the second integral only non-small values of q contribute and give the 0(a) contribution. Therefore in (30.12) we dropped terms such as‘Y2q2 + + 2 -> 2 . P ’ q q . (p ° 5) and etc. In (3C.13) we put p = O, Y = O. Beside these approximations we also used the relation po -- K -ED and p ~ Y, which follow from the fact that the main contribution, up to the 0(a), comes fvwxn the pole in wave-function. USing (30.12) and (3C.13) hi C3C.11), we notice that we need the following integrals, which can be found by the table of integrals which is provided in [19] 2 qug—-=iir I131 1 __ I 0y . (30.1u) 0 /x o k2y2 _ k2y + E: _ 52x +2 2 q Q _. f 0“q D“ = 13 (1 - 3a)r(-a) (u = 1. 2. 3) . (30.15) 929 2 f dnq p° = -21112 - 102F(-a) , (3C.16) +1 . x dnq-flfi = ‘1: (3 - 7a)r(-a) . (30.17) azq 2 f 0“q ° = ’1“ (1 + 3a)F(-a) , (3C.18) D A 32 In relations (3C.15) - (30.18), we dropped 3 and p0 and Y, since we are interested in finding the values of these integrals up to the 0(1), which corresponds to the 0(a) correction to GEa3. The integral in (3C.1A) is performed in Appendix A and is given by equation (A.7). the result is f 0 qq—=l‘p—sin. (————P--—) - 21112 . (30.19) D /32 p Y2 Using these results in equation (3C.11), we find u - (A F) =-51§— [31 (E + 1) sin 1 (————Jl—-—) - 8 + r(-a)] . (30.20) u T p D '35—““‘§ /p + Y where the first term will give the 0(1) and the rest the 0(a) corrections to 68:. From equations (3C.2), (3C.10), (30.20) and equation (2.16) for wo' we find a a6 /- a 3 Ep + K 55 = 2 (1 +-—) f d p 3 16113 ” 6 (52 + Y2)2E (E + 1) p p 21103 +1) _1 x [ 2 sin (————11———) - 8 + r(-a)] . (30.21) /32 + Y2 Since in the square brackets the first term gives the:<>(1) and the second and third terms give the 0(a) corrections to 68a, for the second and third terms we use the approximation Ep = 1, K = 1. 33 Therefore, using these approximate relations and then performing p integration on these two terms we find 5 5 6E: =-%; /2 (1 + %- [-/§ +-—§ r(—a) m p {E + K _ + a fodp p2 p 2 2 sin 1 (———4B—-)] . (3C.22) (p + Y ) E +2 2 p /p + Y The ithegra1.i11 (3C.22) is performed in the Appendix A and is given by equation (A.20). Using that result we find, up to the 0(a) correction u a 01 6E3 ='_E [2 - 52.. (I C! p -§ +-§p r(-a)] . (30.23) To find 68;, we note that in the diagram of the Figure 5. up to the 0(a) correction, only the instantaneous Coulomb interaction DOO 0f the photon propagator D contributes, where iv 1 _ v v A D)v(p) =.;§ [ giv + +2 ] ' (30.2A) P—iu Figure 5. Diagram which is related to dish 3. R is defined in (2.30). 3A Dominant contribution comes from small p and q1 (but it is not the case for q), more specifically, p and q1 are of the order a, so we keep the lowest powers of p and Q1 and we set Ep = Eq = 1, 1 where ever it is legitimate (for more details see Section D of Chapter A for calculation of MB which is similar to the GED.) 3 After performing PO and q0 integrations we find (poles are 9 Q10 at p0 = K - E = K - E and q0 = K - Eq) p. 010 Q1 6 oEb = a /2 (1 + 9) f d3pd3qd3q (2E + 1) WE + K 3 3811117 1 6 1 q q 1 . 80(K. 6. 6,)[(32 + Y2>2<3 “ 51>2<31 * *2)‘52 * 12)Eq]— ' (3C725) or after performing p integration 5 (2E +1)./E +1<fi(1<,3,5) 683:: °‘ 5 /2(1 + %)f(13q<13q1 9 p2 ‘212 +2 0 2 1 . (30.26) 19211 (01+Y)(q +Y)Eq A where EC comes from Hc’ equation (2.27). after performing p0, qO and Q10 integrations, or (30.27) 35 The integral in (3C.27) does not contribute. It is so because by direct integration we can show (see Appendix C) I 03.11: (62) f 0361 [1 2B ’ A ‘ B" 2] -- 0 . (30.20) Ap + B (1 - p) where F(82) is any function of a2 which satisfies the conditnni (C.13) of the Appendix C q. +2 p2 2 F(q ) < w . (3C.29) which in our calculations it is the case. Therefore, using (3C.27) in (3C-26) and performing Q1 integration p 5 a 3 (2E +1)./E +1: 003=°2/'2‘(1+—6-)qu 32 23 2An (q + Y ) Eq 2 Y (2 + K + E ) i- a " [2 +2 2 ] '. (30'30) q + Y The second term in square brackets only for q ~ Y contributes. For this term we use the approximations Eq = 1 and K = 1. Therefore ash-i/E(1+9-)Id3q 1 3 802 6 (52 + Y2)2 36 2 1 A /2'Y x [312:1- (ZEq + 1) VEq + K ‘ W] . (3C.31) The integraticnicni the first term in square brackets is performed in Appendix B and is given by the equation (8.11).. Using that result and performing the integration on the second term in the square brackets we obtain 0' Q J: 20 0E =-—E (1 +-§—) . (30.32) UL) So, by virtue of equations (30.1), (30.23), auui (30.32), the contribution 683 is [3 + 0 - —— + —2—p— r(-a)]. (30.33) D. Contribution 68” For GE“, Figure 2(d), we use the same decomposition that we had for 6E3, equation (30.1), or 11 + 6E“ . (30.1) where dEpa and dEub are represented in Figure 6. (a) iGEpa -2 KS > u 1 ml—e (0 e. o m a: 1: '81 A _) 4. <3le V V (b) 16E" =~2 Ki 0’ a b A and 6E“ . Figure 6. Contributions 6E Using the following identity, which we gave it by the equation (2.22) (momentum integrations are implicit) we = GOchO . (30 2) we obtain the identity which is respresented in Figure 7. 1(1 = (l I Figure 7. The identity which is the direct result of the equation (3D.2). earid from it we find the contribution 6E a u 083—-2 (SE (30 3) 11 ' 1 ' ' <>r~ by virtue of (3A.5) a an 20 6E” =-H (-2 --§—) . (38.A) 38 Calculation of dEub is similar to 6E3b. Ihi fact, by applying the same approximation that we used for (SE b, at the very beginning 3 we note the following relation which is correct up to the 0(a) correction 68 = —68 . (30.5) (for the details of calculation see Section E of Chapter A for the calculation of M5b which is similar to GEub). Equations (3D.5) and (30.32) give u 60 b ='EE (—1 —-§1) , (3D.6) annd equations (3D.1), (3D.A) and (3D.6) give 68 = 25 (-3 --51) (3D 7) A A 3 ' i E. Contribution 0E5 To find (SE25, Figure 2(e), we decompose its contribution into ‘tvvo parts, as we did in (30.1) for 683 a b E = E + E E. 6 5 6 5 6 5 . (3 p1) "P1€3re GESa and 6E5b are represented in Figure 8. 39 (a) 1685a 11 > e¢oa*“/2 (1 + g) a. (b) idES 6? II J: e¢o€*“/2'(1 + 9) Figure 8. Contributions GESa and 6E5b. Lines with a dash through them indicate inverse propagators. For the electron self-energy we use the following form [19] 19 + 2(9)='%Fr(‘a)(¢‘1)+%;{~gp°i-%0Y -f1-9£{(1 _ x)5 . ? + 1]1n x + 2f1 dx[(1 - x)p - 1]ln Y Opf‘ O x +2-p-Yfgdx/xfzpduln2} , (3E.2) undere, the mass-renormalization is already performed and X ll 1 + 52(1 - x) , y = 1 - 02(1 - x)-ie . 1 - p02(1 - u) + 32(1 - xu) -ie . (32.3) N II For the contribution 6858, Figure 8(a), we write A0 a _ _ *u pg 6E5 — A0000: 1/2 (1 + 6) 11 d p 1 1 x f (210” . (38.11) Using (3E.2) for £(p +-%k), by replacing p by p + %k III (38.2) and (3E.3). we find 6E5a = 620 5*“/2’r(-a)f dupu < Y 0 (p) > O (21;) u 0 A -a2¢og*u/§ f _d__P__ 1 < Y S(p + —k) (2")A p 2 x [0 + + 1 p - Y + 02(0O + K)Yp + 0 10(0) > . (30.5) 3] innere C2 = 12--f1-9£ (1 - x)ln X -2f1 dx(1 - x)ln Y + 2f1 dx f1 du ln 2 , 1 6 of _ o 0 o x C: = --l + 2f1 dx (1 - x)ln Y 22 2 o 0 ’ 03 = 41—“ In x -2 11 dx 1n Y . (38.6) 0 /—' O x The first integral in (38.5) up to the order that we are ~1111:erested is (see equation (3A.3)) A1 A I” (20) - - H'- p < Ypup(p) > - /2'5 /2 . (38.7) For the second integreal in (3E.5), we can show that it is of higher orders so we can ignore it. In fact, after performing the po integration (dominant contribution comes from the pole hi the wave- function, or for p0 = K - Ep; we close the contour in the upper half pflane of p0). then by scaling E + Y3 we note that in order this integral contributes, the following trace should be, at most, of the order 02 . (38.8) where p0 = K - Ep. It is not difficult to see that we need to find 01 up to the o (1), but for C2 and 03 up to the order 012. From the relations in (38.3) and (38.6). with the replacement p by p + %k, we find the fwallowing approximate relations 10 C1 ,3 , 0 = -2 - 4(52 + Y2)1n[2(52 + Y2)]-2(f52 + Y2) 2 03 = 2 + A(E2 + Y2)1n[2(32 + Y2)]"% 32 . (38.9) A2 where we have used the following approximations S , 1c =1 - —Y . (38.10) After finding the trace in (38.8) and using (38.9), we note that it is of the order higher than 02. Therefore the second integral in (38.5) does not contribute. Using (38.7) in (38.5) we obtain .fi' 685a = “—p [- % r(-a)] . (38.11) For the contribution 685b, Figure 8(b), we write 6E A A + + b 100 ¢OE*u/§(1 +.E)f d p d q, R(K, p)R(K, q) 5 A (2")A (20)“ EquNqu X " + + + + HC(K. q. p)<(Np + p - Y)(1 - YO)(Nq + q ° Y) 1 1 + + $01 3k)YpS(q + §k)(Nq + q - Y)(1 + YO) X x (Np +5 . Y’)S(p + gkmb + %k)wo(p)> , (38.12) Where we have used (2.30) for R. Using relations (AD.9) for simplifying the trace in (38.12), and using (38.2) for )3, we note that (by scaling B + Y5 and a 4 Y3) A3 the most contribution comes from E, 8 ~ Y and the poles at p0 = K - 8p and q0 = K - Eq (there is only one pole for qo). After performing the p0 and q0 integrations, we obtain 5 I; (K, a! E) b - a "a _ 3 3 0 GE - [ r( a)]fd pd q ,2 2 2 .2 2 5 16115 u" (p + Y ) (q + Y ) + [contribution from the second term of 2]. (38.13) where AC is given by (38.6). We can show that contribution of the second term of )3 is of liigher orders, so we may neglect it. In fact, for the contribution of’the second term of Z we have a similar situation that we had for 61358; here we need to find the following trace, at most, up to the or~der012 <(N ++°Y1~Y N-IoiYN-I-ier N-I-Y’ p p )( 0)( q q ) u( q q )( O)( p p ) + -) + -> A + x[c1 p - Y + 02(2r - 8p)Yp+C ](N -p - Y)(1+Y0)€ ° 1 3 P x (Np - E ~i)> . (3E.1A) It is not difficult to show that we need to know 0 up to the 1 QC 1 ) , but 02 and 03 up to the order 012. Therefore we may use (38.9) Fol" values of 01, C2 and 03. After finding the trace in (38.1A) and HM using (3E.9), we note that it is of order higher than a2. Therefore in (3E.13) only the first term contributes. Using (38.6) for go and then (3C.28), relation (3E.13) gets the following form 7 b -a 3 3 1 6E = r(-a)fd pd q 5 16fl5 (32 + Y2)2(52 + Y2) 2 2 1 1 5 --m -Lw x[-+4-+ + H . (£49 A B 2 +2 + Y2 +2 + Y2 where A and B are given by (2.28). Performing p and q integrations, we obtain 6E b = 274-[—9-r(—a)] . (3E.16) and by virtue of (3E.1), (3E.11) and (3E.16) we find , u 6E5 =-§E L:%% r(-a)] . (3E.17) F. Contribution 686 For 6E6, Figure 2(f), we decompose its contribution in the same waY‘that we did in (3C.1) for 6E3 6 + 6E6 , (3F.1) 85 where GEéa and 6E6b are represented in Figure 9. (a) 16E6 ‘ (b) 16E6b 14y) Figure 9. Contributions 6E6a and 6E6 . First we consider the vertex correction in these diagranms (see Figure 10.) m Figure 10. Vertex correction for 6E6a and 6E6b. Chantributions 6E6a and 6E6b can be written as N H * 536a = 4611120121105 “[271 + 3M d qu d p" . (3F.2) N6 duq1 h 1.1 (2H) (2H) (2H) m. 23mm 31) - x . HC(K. q. Q1) -> sz(q1 3k)(Nq + q1 -1)<1 mm} + q - 1r) 1 1 1 -) -> -> + x S(q --§k)Yus(q +-§k)(Nq + q - Y)(1 + YO)(Nq1 + q1 - Y) x S(q1 + 13mm, + g1. p + g-moe» . (31.7.3) where DAV is given by (3C.2N). Using relations (HD.9) for simplifying the trace ill (3F.3) we 4' 9 . -> -> -> + note that (by scaling p + Yp, q_+-Yq and Q1 + Yq1) the most and 61 ~ Y and the poles at .041 contribution comes from B, p = K -13 , qo = K - Eq and q1O = K - Eq1 (for (3F.2) we have the same situation with the exception that there are only p and q variables.) Performing the po, qo and Q10 integrations (for (3F.2) cnmly p0 and q0 integrations) we see that up to the 0(a) correction only 0 contributes. This means that A = 0 (since DOi = o, for V i 1, 2, 3).. Therefore only D00, the instantaneous Coulomb interaction contributes. We summarize these results in Figure 11. 47 h (a) (b) .6, :: Figme‘fl. Equalities which hold up to the 0(a) corrections, where D00 is the instantaneous Coulomb interaction (see (3C.2u).) Therefore, contributions 6E6a and 6E6b get the following form 6 a a 5*“fd3 3 [(p2 2 2 +2 + Y2)(E _ + 2] 1 6E pd q + Y ) (q Q) 32w 1 1 ‘ + . (3F.4) X 6 * _ 6b -—41<7 a “Id3pd3qd3q1 “C(K' 6,. a) 256w 6E [(132 + 12)221“ X X 1 1 ‘ + . (3F.5) where EC is given by (3C.27). Relations (3F.N) and (3F.5) show that we need to find the leading order of A0. In the following we find A0, but we keep in mind that AC is sandwiched between two (1 + YO)'s. N8 Using Feynman rules the quantity A0 (p', p) (where p stands for p +-%k and p' stands for q + %k or q1 +-%k) can be written as . n Ao(p'. p) = ifig-IEES [Fuva(d + p' + 1)10 11’ where D = q2 52[(q + p)2 -1][(q + D')2 '1] 1 2 Fuv= -gW a - qu qv + qo(qu6: + qug) . (3F.7) Since p0 and po' are of the 0(1), and B and 5' are of the 0(a), (3F.6) gets the following form n , = id d q uv A0(p . p) ”"3 f—B- [F Yv(q + 1 + YO)YO(d + 1 + v0)vu] , (3F.8) or if we use the fact that in (3F.N) and (3F.5).1¥)is sandwiched between two (1 + YO)'s . n AO(P'. p) = -39-r959 [qiqz + 2q§ 62 + (3 - n>q2 62 “W3 + u qoq2 + u q2] . (3F.9) Using the table of integrals, which are provided in [19], we obtain the following relations N9 2 2 Q q n o 2 1 dx_ 1 .1 , _ , 2 qu p 111 f0 _fody{A[p +y(po po )1 /x 1 -1 xaA aI‘(-a)} 2 1 ’ q q n o _ _. 2 1 Ex. 1 .1 , _ , qu p - 111 fo'rfodyA [p0 +y(pO p0 >] . x 1 2 a . 2 1 d 1 1 fdnq-g— = In f0 -£-fody-K- . .5 1 n 62q2 2 1 a fd q D = in I‘(-a)fodx A2 , (3F.10) and also the following relation <12 32 2 n o _ 2 1 1 x , _ , 2 Id q D 111 f0 dx f0 dy{‘A-;[po + y1m where 2 A=[p'+y(p-p')] .B=1-p'2+y(p'2-p2). C = [po' + y(pO - po’)]2 . (3F.16) Since the approximate values of A, B and C are (for all values of y, 0.5 y_: 1) A=1,B=o,C=1 , (3F.17) we can use these values in (3F.15) before performing the integration. Using (3F.17) in (3F.15) and then performing the y hategration we obtain . 2 fdnq OD -—l—Z—[l‘(-a)-1] . (3F.18) Now, by virtue of (3F.9). (3F.1H) and (3F.18) we find 1 _ E_, _ AO(P . p) - H“ F( a) . (3F.19) 52 Relation (3F.19) is derived under the assumptknithat A0 is going to be sandwiched between two (1 + YO)'s. Therefore the proper way of writing (3F.19) is a 1 z __ _ (1 + YO)Ao(p . p)(1 + 10) (1 + 10>[ufln a)]<1 + 10) . (3F.20) 'We note that, we have proved the legitimacy of using the following approximation in the integral in (3F.9) ..) p' = p = (1. o) . (3F.21) However, if we use (3F.21) at the very beginning, 1.63., using (3F.21) 1J1 (3F.6) where A0 is not yet sandwiched between two (1 + Yb)'s, we find a term which is proportional to (1 - YO) but undefined. Still there is a fast and simple way of fhufing the result (3f.20). By considering the following approximation (instead of (3F.21)) 212 2 p'=p=(21<-Ep.p)=(1-Y -35.3) . (3F.22) we can write (at this point we only use the equality p' = p) 1 1 Ao(q1+§k,p+§k) 1 1 Ao(q +31“ p +—24<) 1 1 110(1) + 5k. p + 5k) . (3F.23) 53 1k, p + %k), which can be Therefore, we need to find Ao(p + 2 found by the Ward identity A (p. p) = - —§- 2 (p) . (3F.2u) 0 3p , 0 Using equation (3E.2) for Z, and approximate relations (3F.22), and keeping only the leading orders we obtain 1 Ao(p +-§k. p + Ni.“ 01 ) ='EF {YOT(-a) + u(1 -Yo) x [1 + 1n(232 + 212)]} , (3F.25) where if we sandwich this AO between two (1 + YO)'s we find the same form that we had in (3F.20). Since the second term in (3F.25) does not1x>the 0(a); they are the result of equation (3F.25). Now, using the result (3F.20) or (3F.25) in the relations (3F.u) and (3F.5). we find 5H 7 + + +9— 6363 = a 5 F(-a)fd3pd3q[(p2 + Y2)2(q2 + Y2)(p - q)2] 1 . (3F.26) 16w b a7 333- +~> 6E6 = 8 T(-a)fd pd qd q1 Hc(K. Q1. q) 128w . x [(32 + Y2)2(3f + 12)(32 + 12)(3 - 51)2]-1 . (3F.27) or by virtue of the equation (3C.27) for go and equation (3C.28) and then performing the integrals u 6E6a = E74-[%-r(-a)] , (3F.28) as b - 35 [—°1 r(- )] (3F 29) 6 - u 2n a ' Finally, relations (3F.1), (3F.28) and (3F.29) give u a 3a 6136 = 7 [31; r(-a)] . (311.30) We note that, there is a close connection between 6136, Figure 2(f), and GE Figure 2(c). In fact, since we are interested in the 3! leading order, we can derive the results (3F.28) and (3F.29) by observing that in the diagrams in the right-hand sides of the equalities in Figure 12,I%K)can be replaced by Duv' We represent this approximation in Figure 13. (a) D = 55 (p) p". 2: Figure 13. Equalities which are correct up to leading order, i.e. 0(1). Comparing the results in the Figures 9, 11, 12 and 13 we obtain equalities which are represented in Figure 1“. * (a) 16E6a= e¢og “/E'fig-P(-a) :::Z:::>fifi- * (b) 15E b= ed) 5 “5—9- I‘(-a) .6, 6 0 Mn Figure 1”. Equalities which are correct up to the 0(a) correction. Now, the comparison of the Figure 11 with Figure 114 gives the following relation which is correct up to the 0(a) correction SE = —9-r(-a) GE 6 2“ (3F.31) 3 9 and by virtue of the equation (3C.33) for GE we recover the 3! equation (3F.30) for 656. There is also a relationship between 6E6 and 685, which CENT be found, simply, by comparing (3F.30) with (3f.17) 6E = -6E . (3F.32) 56 G. Contribution 6E7 For calculating 6E Figure 2(g), by virtue of the Figure 15 7’ __LC:5__’ 16E = 216E 7 1 ———7l-——-—— Figure Hi Equality which is the result of comparing Figure 2(a) with Figure 2(g). we write 1: _ d p _1 _§_ _ ‘1 _ 1 'T ”7 ‘ 2531f 112 3k < S (p Emi’o‘p) (2v) 0 x 2(p + J2-k)wo(p) > . (30.1) k0 = 2K Using relations (2.16) and (2.17) for wave-functions and relation (3E.2) for 2, we obtain -ia 6E72 11 8Kw u _ 3 6E1P(-a)fd p(k + Ep)(K Ep) x [(52 + Y2)u(pO + K - Ep + ie)2(po - K + Ep - 102]-1 ~ia6 u + 6E1fdup(K + E )(K - Ep)2 8Kn p +2 2 H 2 _ _ 2 -1 x [Ep(p + Y ) (po + K Ep + 16) (p0 K + Ep is) ] 1 %k . 32)] . (3C.2) where -—k ) - f X In X ‘11? X + 2x; dx{(1 - x)[Ep(pO +-%ko) - 32] - 1} ln y + 232f; dx /§'f; du ln 2 , (30.3) and X, Y and Z are given by (3E.3) (with the obvious replacement of 1 p by p +-§k). After performing pO integration (dominant contribution corresponds to the pole at p0 = K - Ep) we find -a6 3 K + E 6E = (SE I‘(-a)fd p T“ 7 16113 1 (p2 + 12)“ 2 6 (K + E ) — a 3 6E1fd3p 92 p 321 Ep(p + Y2)5 3F -.§§_ x [F + (K - Ep)(2-§E; apo)] . (30.1) The second term in square brackets of (3C.11), because of the following identity, is zero 58 1 BF 8k 2 3p . (30.5) 0 0 Using relation (3C.3), we note that F is of order higher than a2, i.e., the first term in square brackets also does not contribute. Therefore, only the first integral in (BG.N) survives. Using the approximation Ep = K = 1 in this integral, we find _.:2 _ 6E7 - 2" F( a) 6E1 , (36.6) or by virtue of relation (3A.5) for 6E1 .1: a -a 5157 — 7 [3“— r( a)] . (3G.7) H. Summary of the Calculation of the Total Energy-Shift of the Orthopositronium Ground-State due to the One- Photon-Annihilation Channel Using relations (3.3), (3C.1), (3D.1), (3D.3), (3D.5) and (3F.32), we obtain the total energy-shift of the orthopositronium ground-state 6E = -6E + 6E2 + GB + 6E , (3H.1) which we represent it graphically in Figure 16. 59 16E = 2 “ + >.o~< +4: >“< Figure 16. Graphical representation of the total energy- shift, correct up to the order a correction. Relatnn1(3H.1), or its graphical representation Figure 16, shows that, up to the 0(a) correction the second term of 60' R, does not give any contribution to the energy-shift 6E. Using relation (3H.1), (3A.5), (38.13), (3C.23) and (30.7), we obtain 11 ds=9—u(1-ia—- 11 212° ) . (311.2) whcih agrees with the result of Karplus and Klein [12]. We present all results of calculations of the present Chapter in the Table 1. 60 Table 1 Summary of the Calculation of the Energy-Shift G“ a 5E1 1 T (1 + *) 11 a -8a 532 "H (7.11?) 53 Ef-[3 + a - BE-+pg— P(-a) 3 H N 2w 1.1 a ”a 6El4 '—E (‘3 "§-) L1 a -3a _ 5135 7 [—2—11- I'( a)] u a 3a _ 636 7 ['27: l"( a)] a" -a 6E7 71:2? F(‘3)] u a “a 8a “3 =1:1 6E1 ‘11“ ’7-51?) 61 Chapter u Decay Rate of the Ground-State of Parapositronium in the First-Order Perturbation Theory For the decay rate we use the perturbed wave-function 111 which can be written [30] as _ " 2 = 1 0 up 1110+ (6K )11;O+Gc 6K1po+o(6K) , (11.1) where GC is given by (2.29) and C is the normalization constant auui 6K = K - K0 is represented graphically in Figure 17. .21.— ~71... 2.1:. .1 .. _+—- E w 1, _‘C:7— Figure 17. Kernel 6K, where the Coulomb-like kernel Kc is given by (2.31). Lines with a dash indicate inverse propagators. In relation (N.1), $0 is the zeroth-order Barbieri-Remiddi wave-function [17]. which for the ground-state of parapositronium is given by (2.19), and Prime stands for éz'gzy and (..Q)nwans the expectation value with respect to $0 (see (3.2)). The normalization constant C, up to the order a, is [31] c" = 1 + (6K') . (u.2) The only (6K') which contributes (up to cfla)) is the one that we represent it in Figure 18. We can show that its __4C::h_.’ (GK') = 2 ___.f—-—-—' Figure 18. The only h“(') which contributes, up to the 0(a) correction. value is the same as the (5K') for orthopositronium. So by comparing relation (3C.6) with Figure 15, we obtain 1 _._E - (6K ) - 2“ T( a) . (4.3) Therefore, from relations (N.1)-(N.3). the perturbed wave- function, up to the 0(a) correction, is = c p c[1po + (6K )10 + 0c 6K p0] , (u.u) where C, the normalization constant, is C =1+ 74- I‘(-a) . (11.5) To find the decay rate up to the 0(a) correction, we need to consider only the decays to two photons. It is so because for 63 parapositronium, decays to odd number of photons are forbidden and decays to four photons are of the higher orders. Let's express the decay amplitude as [31] 1 (2w 2m'K) T(p-Ps + 2Y) = M (p-Ps + 2Y) . (4.6) 1/2 where, w = “1|, (0' = |1’| and 1: and 11' are wave vectors of the two photons; M the invariant decay amplitude is u M(p-Ps . 2v) = f d 9“ . (1.7) ' (2w) The quantity'11 is represented graphically by irreducible graphs in the Figure 19, and we assume the mass and charge renormalizations are already performed. l 5,11 .~a P+zk + n = Y I ’ ‘t —+ 52K ,,___L~u Figure 19. Quantity n, up to the 0(a) correction. In C. M. frame, M can be expressed as M = f h - (e x e') , (4.8) A A where f is a constant and k.is the direction of the decay line and e A and e' are polarization vectors of the two back to back photons. 64 The decay rate is 3 3 d d ' (211)" 5% - k- 11') z 1112 , (11.9) (2103 (2103 8" 1 F=fif where, k = (2K, 6). By virtue of (4.6), (4.8) and (4.9) we obtain r = 811? |r|2 , (14.10) or, up to the order a correction r=%17|f|2 . (11.11) The invariant amplitude M, according to the Figures 17-19 and relations (4.5) and (4.7), can be expressed up to the 0(a) correction as 8 M=.§ M, , (11.12) where M 's are represented graphically in Figure 20. 1 11,: P+ K 1 (a) M1 = 2c " 1""i” l k—K,a (b) M = 110 1 (c) (d) (e) (f) (g) (h) M3 = 20 Mu = 20 M5 = M6 = 65 QVJ ) _ 3 7".— M = 4C( Figure 20. /~n. M=4C 1 ( ( )1: ( )3... 3541 Contributions to the invariant decay amplitude, where Gc’ Kc and C are given by (2.29), (2.31) and (4.5) respectively. Lines with a dash indicate inverse propagators. In the following Sections we calculate the contributions Mi's. For M M = 2Cf d p (2“) 1 19 q 4 A. Contribution M1 Figure 20(a), we write < -ie 2' i S(p + %k -k)(—ie ¢)¢O(p) > , (4A.1) and using (2.19) for wo' after performing pO integration, we obtain 66 a 20‘2 3 Ep + K M -—— Co K 0 e x E'fd p A 1 1' 0 E13652 + Y2)2(Ep -5 ° 1*) P (E2+1<2-213-R’)1/2 ‘ (1111.2) In the square brackets of (4A.2), the first term is due to the pole of wave-function and it gives the 0(1) and also gives contribution to the 0(a) correction; the second term is due to the pole in propagator and it gives contributLon to the 0(a) correction. Therefore, for the second term we may use the approximation K = 1 (since for this term only non-small values of E contributes). After performing angular integrations, (4A.2) gets the following form 2 °° p M = 8C a p k - e x e' {f dp in (E + p) 1 o o (32 + Y2)2E p p m E+1 (E+p)(E-1+/62+2-2p) -fdp—p—-——ln[ p p ]} . (11111.3) p Ep-1+/p+2+2p The first integral is performed in Appendix D. For the second integral, we found it by numerical integration. The results are 2 first integral = /2 (:3 + G - 2 ln 2 --§%g) , (4A.4) 67 second integral = /2 A , (4A.5) where, G = .91596559... is the Catalan Constant and A = .49172096... . Therefore using (4.5) for C, contribution M 1 up to the 0(a) correction is 2 M1 = M011 + T4g-[M-a) + 80 - 8A - 16 ln 2 —-3%—]} . (4A.6) where 3 ll 4 /2lw a ¢o K ° 6 x e' , (4A.7) is the lowest order invariant amplitude. B. Contribution M 2 For M2, Figure 20(b), we write d” 1 M2 = 4Cf p“ < -ie t' i S(p + 5k -'K)(-ie) ‘ (2n) n 1 1 x Ai(p + E3 -'k. p + 5k)eiwo(p)> (1 = 1. 2. 3) . (13.1) where momenta p, k and.k, and polarization vectors eanuie' are shown in Figure 21. 68 p+~1§k 11,5: ,, :VVVvVv?”“M~ Lkgxk 1 V p -‘§k k -'k, e' < M Figure 21. Diagrwun related to M where k = (2K, 8), 2’ k: (K, 1:) and k2 = 0. After performing p0 integration (dominant contribution comes from the pole in the wave-function, or for p0 = K - Ep) and scaling S + YE we note that the dominant contribution comes from E of order Y} therefbre we neglect p wherever it is possible. We find up to the 0(a) correction 3 -12 dp M‘na‘bofif-e 22 . (1113.2) where we have used (4.5) for C. Since we need only the leading order of A1, we neglect p in A1 and perform the rest of the integration in (4B.2). We find M2 = nape/'2’ ei<¢'[(1 + YO) + K o1(1 — 1(0)] 1 1 x 111 (3k -k. 540(1 + YO)Y5> . (48.3) 69 1where we introduced another factor of (1 + YO) in order to simplify the calculation of the trace. Ai can be found by the following relation n _ in d g uv + . + Ai -~;;§ f D F Yv(q + R Y + 1)Yi(q + YO + 1)Yu , (48.4) where p = 32 q2[(q + -;—k)2-1][(q + -%k 402-1] , (1113.5) Fuv = _8uv a2 _ quqv + q°(qu6: + qvég) . (48.6) Let's separate the term which gives the ultraviolet divergence from those which give finite contribution n ia G q uv 111 «;;§ fi—D— F quYquD . u 1a -g_g uv + f D [F vqui(1 + Yonu + F“VY (1 + fi - ?)Y (4 + 1 + Y )Y ] (48 7) v . i o u ’ ° where only the first integral gives ultraviolet divergence. Using (48.7) in (48.3) we obtain 7O ./2 2 a“ d“ ”2 = ‘ I? 0‘ ¢oei[f—I3g—<>n * Fag-(>111 ' (“B-8) where, effectively + + 2 2 +2 2 g o — on... <2n Y[qo q 11 + (3 n>q q Y1 + + 2(2 - n)qi 62 a - v]1015¢'> . (13.9) __ +2+ +_ +.+->.—> <>D__<4Yi(qoq R Y qoq kq Y .. 2 + . 9 1 do q k 1010152: > . (1113.10) To find M2, relation (48.8), we need to perform the q integration. This can be done by using the table which is provided in [19]. We find + term proportional to ki kj; so gives zero contribution to the trace of (48.9) , (48.11) n +2 2 2 Id q 359— = in I‘(-a) , (1113.12) q 32 fduq O = in2(1 - ln 2) . (48.13) 71 The evaluation of these three integrals was easy, so we gave only the final results. However, the evaluation of the rest of the integrals that we need is not straight forward. In Appendix F, we have shown how to perform these integrals. Theruxnflts are (see relations (F.11), (F.14) and (F.39)) 2 2 C10 q 2 112 — — D =i1r[-r(-a)—8+—-2-+u./21n(1+./2) -11 ln2(1+ 5)] . (1113.111) 2 q q 2 OD = 1112[- 1,7 + 2 ln2(1+ 5)] , (1113.15) 11 90‘1th 2 11 3112 95 qu——D——-—-111 hjkD[—§- 16+21n2-—2—-ln (1+5) + %~ln2(1 + f2)] .2 3 112 35' + in 6j1[--§ +'T6 - ln 2 + 2 ln (1 + /2) --l-1n2(1 + 5)] . (118.16) by virtue of (48.8) - (48.16) we find Mofi[2r(-a)+12-u-81n2+1151mm+5) 72 -2ln2(1 + /2)] . (48.17) where Mo is given by (4A.7). C. Contribution M 3 For M3, Figure 20(0), we write d" 1 1 M = ch—i— <-ie 2' 1 S(p + —k - k)(-i)):(p + —+< -k) 3 11 2 2 (2“) x i S(p + —k12 -k)(-1e ¢)po(p)> , (no.1) where the momenta p, k and)(, and polarization vectors 5 and e' are shown in Figure 22. p + 51‘ k, E 7 A.“ .’, V < v‘v—W 1 p --§k k -k, 6' Figure 22. Diagram related to M3, where k = (23:, 8) and h = (K. K). After performing pO integration (the dominant contribution comes from the pole in the wave-function, or for p0 = K - Ep) and scaling B + YB, we notice that the leading contribution to M3 cxmnes 73 from E of the order Y. Therefore we neglect B and replace K by 1 everywhere except for the term-:E—l——§. We find P + Y ‘ 1 2 ' +.-> 1_ +o+ ”3331751’0“ <95 (1+1: Y)E(-2-k k)(1+k Y) 3 d p x 2(1 + Y )Y >f . (4C.2) - o 5 (32 + Y2)2 By performing p integration and using relation (38.2) for Z and finding the trace, we obtain M=M—°i 1dx 1 3 o 1111 [-r(—a) + fO—:1n x + 2 Io dx In x] , (110.3) /x where MO is given in (4A.7). X and Y are given in (38.3), which in present case they are X = Y = 2 - x . (4C.4) Using (4C.4) in (4C.3), we obtain (up to the order a correction) M3=M0fir~[-r(-a)—6+111n2+u51n(1+5)] . (40.5) D. Contribution “4 For MD, Figure 20(d), we use the same decomposition that we used for 683, relation (3C.1), or (4D.1) where MDa and MDb are represented in Figure 23. a (a) MD = 20 . (b) MD = 20 1' 1 Figure 23. Contributions MD3 and Mub. Contribution MDa can be written as 4 4 a = 32n2a2Cf d p d q, Duv M u (q - p) (21) (21) u 1 , 1 _ 1 x . (4D.2) where momenta p, q, k and k, and polarization vectors 2 and e'.are shown in Figure 24, and p0, Duv and C are given by the relations (2.19), (3C.24) and (4.5) respectively. p+—k q+-12'k kve > ‘7 'W a? p-';_k (1";‘k k-klt 5’ ‘4 4 A-‘W Figure 24. Diagram related to MDa. After penfinmung pO integration (up to the 0(a) correction, only the pole in wave-function contributes, or for po = K - Ep) and 75 scaling E + Yp, we note that the 0(1) and 0(a) corrections both come from the small values of B, or S of order Y. By neglecting 52, Y2 and higher orders in B and Y, wherever it is possible, we obtain (see Appendix E) a 1d d p d q 4 M =M C I f [ +1 .4 0 4n5 (52 + Y2)2 D (a _ +)2 2 4 2 2 0 q0 q1 q0 q1 “32 " 2 ‘7' +2 ] ’ (”'3) q q i q k where MO is given in (4A.7) and i = 1, 2, 3 (no summation on i), and p = [(q -%1<)2 -1][(q + %k)2 -1][(q + 7‘2) -k)2 - 1] . (4D.4) we shouldtmnndon that in deriving (4D.3) we also neglected terms of trm~form B - a. We note that in square brackets of (4D.3) the first term gives 0(1) and 0(a) corrections and the other terms give only 0(a) correction which comes from non-small values of q; the 0(1) comes from small q (of order Y). Therefore 3 - (3 in numerators of all terms, gives the 0(a2) correction which we are not interested, so we can neglect it. Da from (4D.3), we do not use any more For finding M approximation with respect to p and q. The only approximation that we use, wherever possible, is related to Y and K. 76 Performing the p integration in (4D.3), we obtain u 2 u 2 a is d qr 4 q0 Q0 ”11 =—_3CMopr+2 +1.72” 2 2n + Y q q q q2q -i—i-—:C23——i—] . (110.5) 1 q k1 These integrals are performed in Appendix C. Using Uneresults (0.2), (G.10). (0.26) and (6.38) of the Appendix G, we obtain 2 a 2 MD =MO{1+FS-T‘-[I‘(-a)+4ln2-1§+2ln (1+5) -8/21n(1+/2)]} . (ups) For MDb, Figure 23(b), we write 11 duq L1 MDb = -2iCn2a2f d DD 14 d Q4 R(K. a)R(K, a1) (21) (21) (21) 8 (K.q.q) c 1 uv _ x BE NN D (p q,)<> , (110.7) qq1qq1 where 1 + + + -> <>a . ( D.8) In relation (4D.7), the momenta and polarizathon vectors are shown + A in Figure 24; Duv, R(K, q), 11.10 and Hc are given by the relations (3C.24), (2.6). (2.19) and (2.27) respectively. p +-§k q1 + 5k q + —k k, e 7 7 7 V‘W 12 \/ -lk -lk -11< k-h ' D 2 Q1 2 q 2 . e b Figure 25. Diagram related to M4 . Calculation of M b is similar to the GE b (Section C of Chapter 4 3 3). The only difference (apart from the wave-function and presence cfl‘polarization vectors) is the presence of the propagator S(q + %k - k) which its pole at q0 = -(Eq2 + K2 - 2a . 1:).1/2 gives contribution of the 0(a). In fact in (4D.7) by using the following relations -(1 - YO)(Nq - q ° Y) , 4D. qo _ K + Eq _ ie ( 9a) + -> 1 (1 - 10m)q + q - Y)S(q - 5k) = 77 x S(q —%k)¢v S(q + 121. 40.: S(q + 32—1<) + -(1— 110)(Nq - q - Y) qO - K + Eq - is (1 - mm + 6 . 'v’)s(q - %k) = , (4D.9a) 78 (Nq - q - Y)(1 + YO) 1 ~> -> S(q +-§k)(Nq + q - Y)(1 + YO) - qo + K _ Eq + is . (4D.9b) , + 1 (1 + Yo)(Nq — 3 . 7) (1 + YO)(Nq + q . Y)S(q +.2k) = q0 + K - Eq + is ' (4D.9c) -> + -(N - q ' Y)(1 - Y ) _ 1 + . + _ a L O S(q 310mg + q Y)(1 Yo) qo _ K + Eq _ 1.: . (110.901) and after performing p0, q10 and q0 integrations, we + + ‘ obtain (p. Q1 ~ Y) b a3 ‘ ‘ " 3 3 3 M = C¢k°exc'fdpdqdq/E +K .4 8 6 o 1 q 11 . 2 " - x [(52 + 12>2 b = <1 (...)1 (1)(1 + v )1 > , (4E.7) u o 5 1 where (1 4-‘n3YY5 comes from wo’ and we use subscript Mub for <> to indicate that this trace is related to the Mub (note that only v = u = o contribute). Let's write (4E.7) in the following form <>M b (1) u (2) <(...)1rLl (1+YO)Y5Yv > . (1113.8) To find <>M b, according to the results (4E.5) and (4E.6), in. 5 1+YO(1)1-Y0(2) (1) (2) ) 2 (4E.8) we replace Yo Yo by (-)0-73--) ( Now, using this replacement and following relations (1) Y (1 + YO)Y5(YO)(2) = 110(1 + YO)Y5YO = -(1 + YO)Y5 , (113.9) 1+Y(1) 1-Y(2) 1+1! 1-Y O 1 O O O (—)( ) (1 + YO)Y5( 2 > = -< 2 )(1 + 10)15( 2 ) = —(1 + y0)y5 , (4E.10) 84 we infer the value of OM b 5 <> b = <> b . (4E.11) M5 = -Mu , (43.12) or by virtue of the relation (4D.15) for Mub b 1 a 1 M5 - M015 +‘4F [5 r( a) + 120 12A 932 - 24 in 2 "'4’]} . (43.13) Finally, (43.1), (43.3) and (43.13) give _ _ i. 2.. -.§ - _ M5 - MO{ 2 + u" [ 2 r( a) 200 + 20x 15n2 +40 ln 2 + 4 ]} . (43.14) F. Contribution M6 For M6, Figure 20(f), we use the following decomposition (4F.1) 85 where M6a and M6b are represented in Figure 28. a ; (=77 ’ 1 ‘1' p - —k k -|¢, 2' 21 x W P + 1k q +‘lk k E > 2A 2* - ’ (b) Mb-4C r "A 6 " A 1 R 1 \/ p--2-k q-—2+< k-k.e' #1 ll ‘1 W Figure 28. Contributions M68 and M6b, where R and C are given by (2.30) and (4.5) respectively. Line with a dash indicates inverse propagator. Calculations of these diagrams are similar to 6E (see Section 5 E of Chapter 3). For M6a, Figure 28(a), we write a d“ 1 1 M =- 16 ime p <9.“ S(p+—k -k)¢ S(p+-k) 6 7 4 2 2 (24) x 2(p + ék)1po(p) > , (43.2) and using (3E.2) for Z, we find M6 2 d” 1 a = 4 101 c I‘(-a)f p” < 213(1) + 5k ~11)“: (p) > (211) ° 86 4 - 4ia2C fi—94E— < d' S(p + l1 , (43.3) 1 3] where C1, C2 and C3 are given in (3E.6). The first integral in (4F.3) can be found, simply, by comparing (4A.1) with (4A.6). the integral, up to the order that we are interested, is u I—d—RE < d'S(p + %k 42).: 110(1)) > = 3.1“; MO . (43.4) (24) ' For the second integral of (4F.3), after performing Unapo integration (dominant contribution comes from the pole in wave- function, or for po = K - Ep, and 3 ~ Y; we close the countor in the upper half-plane of po) and then by scaling E + YB, we note that in order this integral contributes the following trace should be, at most, of the order a2 <¢'(p + i.- 7 + 1)¢(p + KY0 + 1)[c13 - 7 + C2(pO + K)Yo + C3] + + x(Ep + YO - p - Y vow5 > , (4F.5) where p0 = K - E . 87 It is not difficult to show that in order to find this trace, we need to find C1 up to the 0(1) and 02 and C3lnito the 0032). These coefficients, up to these desired orders, are given by (3E.9). After finding the trace in (4F.5) and using (3E.9), we note that this trace is of the order higher than a2. Therefore the second integral in (4F.3) does not contribute and only the first integral gives contribution. Using (4F.4). (4.5) and (4F.3), we obtain 68 = Mop}. Hm] , (43.6) M 2n For M6b, Figure 28(b), we write 4 b d p duq R(K a)R(K E) A = - naCf E E N N HC(K, q, p)<> , (4F.7) M (211)“ (2101I q p q p 6 where <> a <(Np +5 -1’)(1 - 10m:q +5.1)s(q -%k)¢' 1 1 + + xS(p + 5k - k)¢S(q + -2-k)(Nq + q - Y)(1+ 10) + -> 1 mp + p - Y)S(p + %k)2(p + Emwom) > , (4F.8) and we have used (2.30) for R. 88 After using (3E.2) for Z and (2.19) for $0 and also the relations (4D.9) for simplifying the trace in (4F.8), and then + + —) + performing the p0 and q0 integrations (by scaling p + Yp and q + Yq we note that the dominant contribution comes from S, 6 ~ Y and the poles at p0 - K - ED and q0 = K - E ; for Q0 there is only one q pole), and then using the following approximate relations a , K = 1 - —N , (4F.9) we find 11 (K. a. E) b aC -a 3 3 c M =-——— M L—— r(-a)]f d pd q + + contribution from the second term in Z, (4F.10) where RC is given by (38.6). We can show that contribution of the second temnzhlilis of higher orders, so we can neglect it. In fact, for contribution of the second term in Z we have a similar situation that we had for 11:; here we need to find the following trace, at most, up to the order a2 <(Np + B - 1)(1 - 10m:q - E - 1)¢'(p + i - 1 + 1)¢ + + + + -> + x(Nq - q - Y)(1 + YO)(Np - p - Y)[c1 p- Y + C2(2K - 3p)vO + c3] 89 + ~> x(Ep + YO - p - Y YO)Y5 > . (43.11) It is not difficult to show that we need to know C1 up to the 0(1) and C and C up to the 0(a2). Therefore we may use relations 2 3 (38.9) for these coefficients. After finding the trace in (4F.11) and using (313.9), we note that this trace is of the order higher than a2; so we neglect contribution of the second term in 2. Therefore from (4F.10) we have _ 11 (K. E. E) 116 = — M [74-3 I‘(-a)]fd3pd3q ° (4F.12) 815 o 2 . +2 ) (p + 12)2(32 + Y This integral is the one that we had in (3F.13). By comparing (3F.13) with (3E.16) we infer the value of this integral R (K E E) 5 fd3pd3q +2 0 2 2 +2 2 = 8: , (43.13) (p + Y ) (q + Y ) and by using (4.5) for C, we find, up to the 0(a) correction b '01 M6 = MOLE; r(-a)] . (43.14) Now, relations (4F.1), (4F.6) and (4F.16) giveiusthe final result for contribution M6 9O ‘30 M6 = MOLEF- T(-a)] . (43.15) G. Contribution M7 For M Figure 20(g), we use the following decomposition 7! M =M +M , (4G.1) where, M a and M b are represented in Figure 29. 7 7 p + 1k q + 1k k e l ; 2 A 2 2 ' (a) M7a = 4C Y ‘1 ‘1 74W -4 -4 k—k ' P 2 q 2 . 8 p +-lk q + 1k q + 1k k e .32 fr”‘\ 1 ‘2 2 ’ r ‘ 7 v... , (b) M7b = 4c J 3 1r - 1.. 31. S4. “1%. 1. . . . . a b Figure 29. Contributions M7 and M7 . Calculation of these diagrams are very similar to 6E6 (see Section F of Chapter 3), so we try to give only the summary of the calculation. 91 a . For M7 we write 4 4 M73 = 64 c1232; G q“ d P“ <>a , (4C.2a) ‘ (24) (23) where 0 a ¢'s(q + 14. 42).: a v 2 2 1 1 1 X S(q 1' -2—k)AA(q + —k9 P + EkNJOUD > . (“G-21>) 2 For M7b, using (2.30) for R, we write H + + b . 2 2 a"; d q1 dup R(K’ q1)R("' q) (211) (211) (211) (1 Q1 q <11 x HC(K, q1, q)<)b , (4G.3a) where :5 UV — —1 + o + - <>b.. <1) (p Q1)YVS(q1 21<)(Nq1+q1 Y)(1 YO) xmq +6-1)S(q --2-k)ef'S(q + 124 -k)2s(q + 2—4) + + + + 1 ><(Nq + q - Y)(1+ Yo)(Nq1+ q1- Y)S(q1+ 2k) 1 1 xAA(q1 +-2k, p + 2k)wo(p) > . (4G.3b) 92 In the above formula, A is the vertex correction and DI“ is given A by (3C.24). We note that relations (4C.2) and (4C.3),zumuw from a multiplicative factor and the wave-functhon, are the same as relations (3F.2) and (3F.3) respectively, if in the latter relations we use the following replacement Y“ + é'S(q + 2k - 10¢ . (40.4) Since for M7a and M7b we are interested in the leading order (which corresponds to the 0(a) correction), (4C.4) can be written as Y +-—2'(1+‘1E-1’)¢ , (40.5) where, we used the same approximation that we applied for 6E6, namely 3 ~ Y and q0 ~ Y2. In fact, (4G.5) shows that we can use all approximations that we employed for 61336, namely, 3, 31, 6~ Y, and A = v = o, and that for p0, and q0 integrations the dominant q1o poles correspond to p0 = K - E K - E and q0 = K - E . p’ q10 = Q1 q Therefore (4G.2a), after peforming po and q0 integrations, gets the following form which is very similar to (3F.4) _ 3 2 -1 M78 = 1‘; /2¢Ofd3pa3q[(p’2 + Y2)2(q2 + 12) , (46.6) and (4G.3a) after performing p0, q1O and q0 integraticnus, gets the following from which is very similar to (3F.5) b ~ia3 M7 = 6 323 3 3 3 ‘ + + V5'10fd pd qd Q1 HC(K. Q1. q) '1 x[(p2 + 12)2(qf + Y2)(q2 + Y2)(p - q1)2] ~ + + 1 1 x<¢'(1 + k - Y)¢(1 + YO)AO(q1 + 2k. p + 2k)(1 + YO)Y5> . (40.7) where RC is given by (3C.27), and we have used (4.5) for C. Now by vnflnmaof the relation (3F.20) (that we found in the Section F of Chapter 3), which in the present case can be written as (1 +Y)A (q+-1—k p+—‘4<)(1+Y)= . o o 2 ’ 2 . o a (1 + 10mm r( a)](1 + YO) , (4G.8a) U+Ymm-J4p+4m+Y)= o o 1 2 ’ 2 - o (1 + Yo)[fi%-F(-a)](1 + YO) . (4G.8b) relations (4G.6) and (46.7) get the following forms 94 3 -> -> + + -1 M7a =~JE§ MOI‘(-a)fd3pd3q[(p2 + Y2)2(q2 + Y2)(p - q)2] ' , (4G.9) ' 811 M b = “3 M r(-a)fd3 d3 03 3 ( + +) 7 6448 o p q <11 0 K. Q1: q -1 x[(E2 + Y2)2(3? + Y2)(q2 + Y2)(S - 31)2] ' , (40.10) where MO is given by (4A.6). The integrals 1J1 (46.9) and (46.10) are those that we had in (3F.26) and (3F.27), respectively. Therefore a (1 M7 = M012; r(-a)] , (40.11) M b = M [—E-f(-a)] (46 12) 7 0411 ’ ' and by virtue of (46.1) - % - M7 - Mo[—_41r I‘( a)] . (46.13) By comparing (46.11) with (4F.6), and (46.12) with (4F.14) we obtain the following relations (40.14) (46.15) 95 and consequently (40.16) H. Contribution M8 For M8, Figure 20(h), by comparing Figure 20(h) with Figures 20(a) and 18, we find a 1 M8 (6K ) M1 , (4H.1) and by virtue of the relations (4.3) and (4A.6), we obtain M8 = MOL2— r(-a)] . (43.2) I. Summary of the Calculations of the Total Invariant Amplitude and the Decay Rate of the Parapositroniunl Ground-State By virtue of the relations (4.12), (4E.2), (46.12) and (46.16) we find the total invariant decay amplitude . (4I.1) A *which means that, up to the 0(a) correction, the second term in Gc’ R (see relation (2.29)), does not contribute. 96 We represent M, relation (4I.1), graphically in Figure 30. W M = 4 + 2 {: + 2C .3... w- -_J::L—l H, Figure 30. Total invariant decay amplitude, correct up to the 0(a) correction. Line with a dash through it indicates inverse propagator, and the normalization constant C is given by (4.5). In (4I.1), by virtue of (43.17), (40.5). (40.6) and (43.2) we obtain 2 C! 11’ M = MO[1 + 45—2 -10)] , (41.2) where M0, the lowest order invariant amplitude, is given by (4A.7). New that we know the total invariant decay amplitude M, by virtue of the relations (2.18), (4.8), (4.11), (4A.7) and (41.2) we can find the decay rate (up to the order a correction) 5 2 I‘(p-Ps + 2Y) = 12— [1 - — (5 - 74)] . (41.3) which agrees with the result of Harris and Brown [7]. 97 We present all results of calculations of the present Chapter in the Table 2. 98 Table 2 Summary of the Calculations of the Amplitudes and the Decay Rate 2 Mo{1 + T4%{r(-a) + 86 - 8) - 16 ln 2 --3%-]} Mofi[2r(-a)+112-4-8ln2+4/21n(1+/2) - 2 ln2 (1 + /2)] MO ifi-[-T(-a) - 6 + 4 in 2 + 4 /2'ln (1 + l2)] 11112 u -8./21n (1+ .6) + 2 ln2 (1 +/§)]} 2.2;- __ _ MO{2 + u“ [2 r( a) + 120 12) 20 ln 2 1215]) “3.3.1-2-- M { 2 + u“ [ 2 r( a) 200 + 20) + 40 In 2 + 4 Chapter 5 Summary and Conclusion USng the Barbieri-Remiddi lowest-order equation, equation (2.2) which we discussed it in Chapter 2, and working in Coulomb gauge we calculated the energy shift of orthopositronium and the decay rate of parapositronium. For the contribution of one-photon-annihilation channel to the energy shift of the ground state of orthopositronium, using relation (3.1), up to the order a correction we found (see Chapter 3) i; 63=9T(1-i°‘—- 11' 312 (3H.2) which is in agreement with the result of Karplus and Klein [12]. The interesting:point is that we derived relation (3H.2) without performing the wavefunction and the vertex renormalization) subtractions. It means that relation (3.1) which gives the energy shift, is free of divergences and gives the finite result without needing to perform the wavefunction and the vertex renormalization subtractions (at least in the first-order perturbation theory.) For the decay rate of the ground state of parapositronium, using relation (4.9), up to the order a correction we found (see Chapter 4) 100 5 2 I‘(p-Ps + 2Y) = 9—2- [1 - $5 - L1] , (41.3) which is in agreement with the result of Harris and Brown [7]. Here also we derived the result (41.3) without performing the wavefunction and the vertex renormalization subtractions. It implies that the relation (4.9) which gives the decay rate, is free of divergences and gives the finite result without needing to perform the wavefunction and the vertex renormalization subtractions (at least in the first-order perturbation theory). In Chapters 3 and 4 we noticed that in derivations of the results (3H.2) and (4I.3) we encountered some diagrams which "rule of thumb" for finding their leading-order contributions would give higher orders in a than their actual orders. Inn'instance, rule of thumb for the leading-order contributions of the diagrams of Figures 2(c) and 20(d) gives order a, and for the diagrams of Figures 2(f) and 20(8) gives order 02. However, the explicit calculation showed that the leading-order contributions of the diagrams in Figures 2(c) and 20(d) were of the order 1 and for the diagrams in Figures 2(ffi and 20(8) were of the order a. The reason that the rule of thumb for these diagrams does not vunfl< is due to the kernel 6K, which was introduced in Chapter 2; it can generate inverse powers of a. 101 We should also mention that in covariant gauge there are an infinite number of diagrams which contribute to a given order in 0; whereas i11 _<_ from (A.1H) we have E-1 71 m p +2 2 2 E (p + Y ) Using the following relations from (A.16) we obtain +2 _lL. .2 “ p 2/2 (52 + Y2 O!“ )2 E g., VETT7E'3;/1 + K , /1 + K < /E' , (A.15) (A.16) (A.17) (A.18) = 1'__[lln(1“2Y )+1] , (A.19) which means that J2 is not of order-%, so we neglect it. Therefore, using (A.8), (A.9) and (A.12), we obtain the following relation which is correct up to the order-1 Y Ide +21 E E Z sin-1C--E--) = /2 g . (A.20) 107 Appendix B Evaluation of an Integral related to the Contribution 6E1 The following integral is the one that we need for finding 681 (its evaluathnmaflso serves as a sample for finding similar integrals) +2 I = I: +g dpz 2 /E + K (2E + 1) , (3.1) (p + Y ) E where E = / 52 + 1 , K = (1 - Y2)1/2 . (8.2) Scaling the momentum E by Y 5+ YE . (8.3) we find that the leading order of I is I ~ 0(1) . (8.”) Y 1 We need to find the integral I up to the 0(1). Consider the following relation /E + K = /E + 1 (1 - 1 " ")1/2 , (8.5) 1 + E 108 which by (8.2) it is /E + K = /8-+‘1[fi + 0012)]1/2 ~ /E + 1 , (8.6) where we ignored the second term in square brackets, since it gives contribution of order higher than 0(1). Therefore, (8.1) gives +2 I = f0 +2p d2 2 "E g 1 (2E + 1) , (8.7) (p + Y ) or, using (8.2) for changing the variable p to E on dE ___.. I =f (E+ 1)(2E+ 1) /E-1 (B.8) 1 2 2 2 (E - K ) By changing the integration variable E = 1 +-1 x2 , (8.9) 2 we obtain 2 2 2 I=—_8-_fo dxxff 1:)” 23) . (8.10) /2 (x + 4x + NY ) which by using table of integrals, up to the 0(1) is 109 (8.11) 110 Appendix C Proof of an Identity We want to show that the following integral is identically zero I . fd3q F fd3p +2 1 2 2-% ’A 1 28 ‘ 892 . (C.1) (p + Y ) A9 + 8(1 - p) where 2 1 ) ’ Dips-1 ’(C02) and F(32) is any function of 32 which satisfies the condition (C.13). We write (C.1) as I = I + I , (c.3) where I1 =-Zl fd3q 8(62) fd3p (C.H) p (p +Y) 1 1 +2 2 2 2 (8 +1!) Ap+B(1-p) I = fd3q 8(62) fd3p l 2 p (C.5) After performing the p integration in (C.U), we obtain 111 f dq T— F(Y q ) . ((3.6) For 12, we write (x = cos 8, where o is the angle between E 9 and q) I = 3"- f “3" I" dq 62 8(62) 2 p (52 + Y2)2 o x f:: dx [(52 + a2 - 2pqx)p + 8(1 - p)2]-1 . (0.7) or after performing the x integration _ -Nn a +2 w p 12 - 2 f_co dq qF(q ) f0 dp-:§——-—§ p p + Y x in [(p — q)2p + 8(1 - p)2] . ((2.8) By scaling p + Yp, q + Yq and integration by parts, we obtain 2 -un w 2 +2 w dp 2 2 f_m dq QF(Y q )fo +2 9 p + 1 p - q,+ 8(52 + 1)p (p - q)2 + 8(62 +1)(S2 +1) X . (C.9) where _ (1 - p) B - Up . (C.10) 112 In (C.9), Unaintegration on variable p is not difficult to perform. After performing this integral and retaining only those terms which are an odd function of q, we obtain “1232) . ((2.11) I = o . (C.12) We note that this result is based on the following assumption f: dq ——‘l-—— F(Y2 32) = finite . (C.13) 113 Appendix D Evaluation of an Integral related to the Contribution M 1 Consider the following integral I - I" dp (52 + 72)2E ln(E + p) , (D.1) where E = (p2 + 1)“2 , K = (1 - Y2)”2 . Y = %- . (D.2) Scaling the momentum p by Y D * YD 9 (D.3) We notice the leading order of the integral in (D.1) is I 3 0(1) 0 (Don) Y ‘We need to find the integral I up to the 0(1). Using (8.6) in (D.1), we obtain I = f: dp g/E +212 ln(E + p) . (D.5) (p + Y ) E Let's write (D.5) in the following form I=I +I , (0.6) where H II i/‘2fon dp p ln(E + p) . (D.7) 0 (D2 + Y2)2 . I = I” dp p (/E + 1 - 12./2‘) ln(E + p) . (D.8) o (p2 + Y2)2E The integral I1, using the integration by parts, up to the 0(1) is I = V/E(_ - _) 0 (D09) For I let's write it in the following form 2' I2 = 1'de J— (/E + 1 - E/2)ln(E + p) p313 2 2 2 f (1 13(23 " I; g (/——_E + 1 - 8/2)ln(E + p) . (0.10) p (p + Y ) Scaling p by Y shows that the leading order of the second integral is o(Y), therefore we may ignore it and write (D.10) as = I: dp —%—-(/E + 1 - E/2)ln(E + p) . (D.11) I 2 p E 115 Changing the variable p to E (see (D.2)), (D.11) gives I = I” dE———1——-——- (/E +1 - E/2)ln(E + /E22 - 1) , (D.12) 2 1 2 2 (E - 1) 1 + x2 or by changing the variable E = ——§;—— I =-W2f°dx—§—L—-§(/§-1)2(x+/§+1)Inx , (0.13) (x - 1) and if we change x + x2, we obtain I =—16/2f°°dx—-—’£————(x-1)2(x +x+1)lnx . (8.111) The nuithod of partial fraction gives I in a form of integrals 2 which can be found in the standard tables of integrals. The result is 2 _ l _ -1; 12 —/2(2+ G 2 ln 2 16) , (D.15) where G = .915965594... is the Catalan's Constant. Using (D.6), (D.9) and (D.15), we find up to the 0(1) 2 I=/2(§1-T-+G-2ln2-—3-1T—— . (8.16) a 16 116 Appendix E Calculation of a Trace related to Mu In this appendix we calculate a trace which is related to the: decay amplitude Mua, equation (“8.2). This calculation serves as a sample for the method of approximation that we implemented for finding nearly all other traces that we had hicnn'work. Traces were found, mostly, by the SCHOONSCHIP program. The quantity that we want to evaluate is TE 8“”(p — q)¢ x(q + 1 + KYO)Yu(Ep + YO - 3 - ? YO)Y5> , (E.1) where iDuV, the photon propagator in Coulomb gauge is given by (3C.2u), and <> stands for trace. As it can be seen from (ND.2), we are interested in the following quantity (up to the order a) 3 u IEa2f+2dp22fgfigT , (8.2) (p +Y) which is related to the Mua, relation (HD.2) after performing the pO integration (we note that, up to the order a correction, only the pole at po ==K:- Ep contributes (3 ~ Y)). The quantity D in (8.2) is given by (48.4). 117 Relation (8.2) with scaling B + YE shows that I is of the order 4 I ~ a f 253 . (8.3) The most contribution to I is of the 0(1), and it comes from the pole at q0 = K - Eq ~ Y2 (if 6 ~ Y and if we assume <> ~ 1 in (8.1)) 4 3 2.3 - 9.5.1. - .. l. . - f D f 2 (I 9 T 2 a q Y 9 (E014) a a which means I ~ 1 (only for 6 ~ Y) . (E.5) If we assume a is not small (not of the order Y), and <> ~ 1, then d” d“ f-—Eg ~ I —Tfl-~ 1 and T ~ 1 (for non-small q) , (E.6) which means I ~ o(a) , (for non-small q) . ((E.7) In short, the o(1) contribution to I comes from small values of q, while the o(a) contribution to I comes from all values of q (we always keep in mind that 3 is of the order Y). 118 The trace <> in (8.1) has the following orders <> ~ 1 + 0(a) for small q (5 ~ Y) , (8.8) <> ~ 1 for non-small q , (8.9) and-using the above considerations for I-all higher orders of 0 give rise to the o(a2) and higher order contributions to I (relation (8.2)). Therefore, for finding T, relation (8.1), we will use relations (8.8) and (8.9) in order to simplify the calculation. One of the implications of (8.8) and (8.9) is that we may use the following approximations 1+2 12 8 ~ 1 +-§ p 1 , K ~ 1 -E Y 1 , (8.10) + + 2+ + -> ++ + P‘Q"0: QQ'D”O. Q°Kp°q~o ,... (8.11) (for any term which contains p). Using (8.10) and (8.11) in relation (8.1), we obtain 2 2 2 2 q - 2Q + u 2Q - “q + + T=[ + ] (8.12) 119 or since in numerators we can add any term of the forms 32, E . 3, p2, etc. (any term which contains p gives higher orders so its introduction does not change the result), we may write relation (8.12) in the following form q2 l1q2 U o o + + T = L———————— + 1 --———————- --—-——————]<¢'¢ w - Y Y Y > (E - E)2 (a - 5)2 (q - p)2 O 5 Q2 0 + + + [- 1 - + + 2]<¢'¢ q - Y Y0 Y5) . (8.13) (q ~ 8) Theifirst term in (8.13), —:ele:7§, gives the 0(1) and o(a) ' (q - 8) contributions tx>lI. They come from all values of a; small 3 gives both o(1)aumio(a), non-small 6 gives only o(a). We leave this term in its present form. For all other terms in (8.13), their contributions are of the 0(a) and they come from non-small values of a and q0 (for small a, with either the pole at qO ~ 1 or qo ~ Y2, we get contributions of orders higher then a for I). Therefore we may use the following approximate relations (12 Q2 (12 Q2 0 O O 0 (q - p) q (q - p) q and write relation (8.13) in the form q2 uqz T=1u +1-—9-- °]<¢'d§-Y’YY> + 2 +2 2 o 5 (q-p) q q 2 +(-1-——-_)(2)) . (Ii-15) ' q or sintna integration on q, relation (8.2), for the a . Y term gives a quantity proportional to K - Y, (8.15) may be written as 2 u 2 T=[ ‘1 .1__9____39_-Ei_-0q1] + +2 . +2 2 +2 (q-p) q q ki Ci"1 + + 1 o where i = 1, 2, 3 (no summation on i). For performing the integrations in (8.2), the easiest way is .first tn) perform the p integration, which transforms the first term 8 of (8.16), -——————-—, to the form -—————-; (2’1 - E)2 32 + Y2 the q integration, by the Feynman parameterization method. For then we proceed to perform doing this, for the first term, , we use the exact form of D, 62 + Y2 relation (MD.U); but for all other terms we use the approximation K a 1. This method of approximation, in practice, facilitates calculations; it allows us, before performing the integrations, to 121 get rid of unnecessary terms (terms which give those higher order corrections that we are not interested). 122 Appendix F Evaluation of some Integrals related to the Contribution M2 In this Appendix we evaluate three integrals that we need in evaluation of M2. In these integrals D is defined by (48.5) and q integrations are performed by using the Tables provided in [19]. One of the integrals that we need is 2 2 q q . 2 f dnq 0D = In [I1 + 12 - r(-a)] , (8.1) where 1dx1 (1-)2 I1 = fo'f: f0 dy y , (F.2) /x 1 + (1 - x)y 1 1 dx 1 2 12 =-§ f0 5::f0 dy ln[x + x(1 - x)y ] . (F.3) x For I1, after changing x to x and performing the x integration, we obtain 1 (1- )2 2 I = 2fo dy-—————lL—-In(y + / 1 + y ) y/ 1 + y2 (F.u) and by changing the variable y + / 1 + y2 = t 123 — — 2 — 1+5 lnt I1 = -2 + 2 J2 ln(1 + J2) -2 ln (1 + /2) + h f dt 2 , (F.5) 1 t - 1 or n2 2 I1=-2+—u-+2/21n(1+/2)-3ln(1+/2) . (8.6) For 12, after performing y integration and changing x to x2, we find 12 = I; dx[2 In x + ln(2 - x2) -2 + 2 tan-1/ 1 - x2], (F.7) 2 / 1 - x or -— —- 1 1 -1 “2 12 = -6 + 2/2 ln (1 + /2) + 2fo dx tan / 1 - x , (8.8) / 2 1 - x 2 and by changing / 1 - x = t I2 = -6 + 2/2 ln(1 + f2) + 21':) dt —-—1———tan-.1t , (F.9) /1-t2 or [31] 2 _ 2 _ I --6+"—+2/21n(1+/2)-1n (1+/2) . (8.10) 2 N 124 Therefore from (F.1) by virtue of (F.6) and (F.10) we obtain Q Q 2 fdnq —-9—— = i112[-I‘(-a) - 8 + “-5 + 11./‘2‘ ln(1+ /2) - t1 ln2(1 + /'2)] . (F.11) The next integral is Q Q2 fduq OD = in2 I; 9%:f; dy —§ 2 . (F.12) /x 1 + (1 - y) -x(1 - y) ' Changing x + x2, y + 1 - y and performing the x integration we find 2 H q q = 182 I; dy-—aQL;;ll-ln(y + / 1 + y2) . (F.13) W1+y2 and by change of variable y + / 1 + y2 = t and then performing the t integration we obtain 2 ,qq 2 Id q OD = i112 [- 1‘7 + 2 ln2(1+ /2)] . (p.121) The last integral is q Q- q Iduq—‘P—Si—i = 1112(1" 11311, + g 511.) (i. 9. =1. 2. 3) . (8.15) 125 where 2 _ 1 dx x y z(y - z) x xA a l. 1 95 x Y ._E 2 f0 [0 dy f0 dz xA , (F.17) 22 2 A =-;— -(y - z) + 2(y - z) . (F.18) From (F.15) we infer the following relation (since we are . +2 2 interested in the leading order: n. = K = 1) u q q fd q D = in2(f + 3g) . (F.19) Comparing (”8.13) with (F.19) we find f + 3g = 1 - 1n 2 , (F.20) therefore we need to calculate f or g, but not‘boflucfi‘them. We choose to calculate g. From (F.17) and (F.18) we have 1 dx 0— Z J. x y = 2 f f0 dy f0 dz , (F.21) 22 - x(y - z - 1)2 + x or by using the following change of variables 126 z = a , y - z - 1 = B , x = x , (F.22) x-1 x-1-8 1 1 dx 8 _ .5 _: f as f da 2 C12 . (F.23) /x -1 o a - x8 + x Performing the a integration, we find 1 1dx x 2 2 x“ 2 g = filo —: {fodu 1n[(1- x)u + x ]-f d8 In (x - x8 )} . (153214) /x -1 where in the first integral we changed 8 to u-1. By performing the B and u integrations we obtain 3 = 7:12” flag'é [ln(2 - x) -ln 2 + -——£——tan-1 /1 - x] , (F.25) /x V1 - x or by changing x to x - 1 x2 -1 2 g=-2-ln2+2/2ln(1+/2) +fodx tan /1—x .(F.26) 2 / 1-x Let's represent the remaining integral by J 1 x2 -1 2 J = fodx tan ./ 1 - x , (F.27) ——-——7§ . / 1 - x where by changing 1 - x = y gets the following form 127 J = fgdy'/ 1 - y2 tan-1y 5 (F.28) We write J in the following form J = J + J , (F.29) where J1 = fgdy————— tan 1y . (F.30) / 1 - y2 and it is the same integral that we had in (F.9), so N ln2(1+ 5) , (F.31) 1r1 J‘TE 1 and J is J2 = -f;dy ———l—-— (y tan—1y) . (9.32) / 2 1 - y Let's try to find J by integration by parts 2 _ _ 1 _ 2 -1 __JL___ J2 - fody / 1 y (tan .y + 2) . (F.33) 1 + y which by (F.28) we can write it as 128 -__1 _ 2 y J2- Jfody/1 y 2 . (F.34) 1 + y and by changing 1 - y2 = x2 and then performing x integration we get J2 = -J +1 -/21n(1+/2) . (F.35) Using (F.29), (F.31) and (F.35) we find 2 J= +%-[§ln(1+/2)-1iln2(1+/2) . (F.36) l 2 Therefore (F.25). (F.28) and (F.36) give g=-%+lg-ln2+3221n(1+/2)-%ln2(1+/2) , (F.37) and by virtue of (F.20), f is 2 r=1-3" +2ln2-filn(1+/2_)-§ln2(1+/_2_) .(F.38) 2 16 2 H _ Finally, the integral in (F.15) by virtue of (F.37) and (F.38) is 2 u qoqjqfl. 2 11 31r 9/5 qu——D-——-—=i1rhjk£—§ 16+21n2 —2—-1n(1+/2) + % ln2(1 + 5)] 129 2 .— ,2 __3_ 1'..- 31/2 + 1,, 6j9.[ 2 + 16 1n 2 + 2 ln(1 + 15) ~151n2<1 + m] (1.3 =1. 2. 3) - 2 2A] . (0.28) x/x xA where A =-%(22 - y)2 + (x - y)(2 + y - x) . (0.29) 136 Using following transformation 22 - y = u , x - y = v , x = x , (6.30) I3 gets the following form x ( fx-v { u2 f v + 1)dv du 1/; O 0 [u2 + v(2 - v)x]2 . 2 1 dx I3 — in IQ 2 1 1 . (0.31) u + v(2 - v)x ' nfl—s and after performing u integration . 2 I3 = “2‘ 1293‘; f:dy(:+1)(v x; (0.32) /x v (1 - x) + x ' Performing v integration in (G.32) gives in2 1 dx 1 x 1 ' -1 I = — f _— [-ln(2-x) + - tan F1 T 111 , (0.33) 3 2 052 1-x (1_x)3/2 and after performing the x integration on the first term, and changing the variable x = 1 - t2 in other terms, we obtain 13 = 1112[-1 + ./2 ln(1 + ./2)] 2 _ _ [1.2.1. .. __1.._ tan-1, - 1.1.3.. 1.... 1t] . (0.311) 2 1 + in fodt t 2 137 Using the following relation (it can be found by integration by parts) —— 2 f1dt—1-(1/1-t2tan-1t)=1+f1dt(-——1-—-tan1t+i—1—-:—t—— 0 t2 0 ——3 t ./1- t 2 “/1 2t) . (0.35) 1+ t - (G.3M) gets the following form 2 21 t/1- t2 I =i11[-2+/21n(1+/2)] +111f dt—-—-———- , (0.36) 3 o 1 + t2 . 0!“ I3 = -i112[3 - 2/2 ln(1+ /2')] . (0.37) and finally by (G.27) ‘4 q 2 q 2 q f dD‘1(- +3 - 32 l) = -1112[3 - 2/2 ln(1 + 5)] . (0.38) q q k LIST OF REFERENCES 10. 11. 12. 13. 114. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 138 LIST OF REFERENCES D. H. Perkins, Introduction to High Energy Physics. Addison Wesley (1982). J. A. Wheeler, Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. N8, 219 (19U6), also J. Pirenne, Arch. Sci. Phys. Nat. 29, 265 (1947). D. W. Gidley, A. Rich, E. Sweetman, and D. West, Phys. Rev. Lett. 49 (1982) 525. A. Ore and J. L. Powell, Phys. Rev. 75, 1696 (19M9). A. Rich, Rev. Modern Phys. 53, 127 (1981). T. Kinoshita and J. Sapirstein, Preprint CLNS-84/617 (1984). I. Harris and L. M. Brown, Phys. Rev. 105 (1957) 1656. W. E. Caswell and G. P. Lepage, Phys. Rev. A20, 36 (1979). J. Cleymans, P. S. Ray, Lett. Nuovo Cimento, 37 (1983) 569. U. Amaldi, G. Carboni, B. Jonson and J; Thun, Preprint CERN-EP/85-10 (1985). A. P. Mills, Jr. Phys. Rev. A 27 (1983) 262. R. Karplus and A. Klein, Phys. Rev. 87 (1952) 8A8. T. Fulton, D. A. Owen, and W. W. Repko, Phys.1knm Lett. 2A (1970) 1035. W. E. Caswell and G. P. Lepage, Phys. Rev. A 18 (1978) 810. G. T. Bodwin, and D. R. Yennie, Phys. Rep. “3 C (1978) 267. W. Buchmuller and E. Remiddi, Nucl. Phys. B 162 (1980) 250. R. Barbieri and Remiddi, Nucl. Phys. B 1H1 (1978) H13. 8. Love, Ann. of Phys. 113 (1978) 153. G. S. Adkins, Phys. Rev. D 27 (1983) 181“. D. Heckathorn, Nucl. Phys. B 156 (1979) 328. 21. 25. 26. 270 28. 29. 30. 31. 139 J. D.Eficwken and S. D. Drell, Relativistic Quantum Fields. McGraw-Hill, New York (1965). G. 't Hooft and M. Veltman, Nucl. Phys. B an (1972) 189. W. Buchmuller and E. Remiddi, Nuovo Cimento A 60 (1980) 109. E. E. Salpeter and H. A. Bethe, Phys. Rev. 8D (1951) 1232. J. Schwinger, J. Math. Phys. 5 (196“) 1606. E. E. Salpeter, Phys. Rev. 87 (1952) 328. V. K. Cung, T. Fulton, w. W. Repko, A. Schaum and A. Devoto, Ann. of Phys. 98 (1976) 516. H. A. Bethe and E. E. Salpeter, Quantum Mechanics of One- and Two-Electron Atoms. Academic Press, New York (1957). .J. M. Jauch.and Rohrlich, the Theory of Photons and Electrons. Springer-Verlag, New York (1976). G. P. Lepage, Phys. Rev. A 16 (1977) 863. G. S. Adkins, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 146 (1983) 78.