.m...J. 44.3.14: .. 3.. . ...r. . .....I....>.....u....r.....”LEM. .... $53 .I... . . . .I. ... 13......2 ......L........ ......32. ..r.......r.... ......M... ....1... . .... .151... ... . ... .... 2.3.... .... I... . ...... :3 3.1V. .s... 1.2.5.5.... .. ... ......1...” ...: I... .9: . . .. . ...... ......3... . ........4:.... . .... . . . .4...4.......: 7:33.... ...: .... ; ...... .........«.:... 2.32.3.1 2...: . , .....3...._..... ...... . s .. 9.41.5.5 ...... f ......v ... : ... p.- Irrawi. ......n. .I... ._ I Z... . .. .. ...... ... ...;I... 31...: .. ...}...I. 4 ......I...‘ 4.... . 1.1....( a . .... . .... . I . . 75.21:...- (A. ...Jdn4‘........;...: 3...... .....4...:..f..._ ...... .I.‘ ‘1 <1 I‘ I... fix?— . 19.39.... 5.4.2.... wring—m ......2.....,.x:... .5 v . .a..) : \z...D— . ...]. $13.3...) ... .... . .. . .. .... .. ... .. I ....7 ....r..¢........ 7...... .1. .... I .. .... ._ .....f....../... ; ..L...... . . .. .. 3...... . . .......)L......r.. .......:... 3:3... ... .1 . . .....2 ... ...): $2.1... ... 4.... z... .73... ... ...... 3.v .... .... .4.-.43.”. ... ....I......I.,.H.H..$.. .......).:....2.:. -. ...; .......... . ......HL ......M.......s..._.. ..I..4V ..f ... 22...... ...r .1 a? v... . .4. ......z... . , .. ... . 51.4.... ...4. ......2... .7...- .... .I...:3 213...... . . . . . . ... 221.35... ...hr....r.. ......)WruA . ...... 1 .. .. I . . . . . .... . . . 4 . . ... .. .. . . .. v ..r... 4...... . 3.15.191“. ....» 1.9.1... {13.177341; ...)...t... ......t .>4...H....4un.k.d . .. . .38..” 3...... my. 33......» ......72. . 4}” .1... . ... 3.2.x...» ...... ......n.... P I my .... . .. .4.... .15.... .... I57... ...... I...4. ...... . .. .... ...”...I... . ...4 . . .........~... ... .1 r .43... . 4).... 4 ...... .... . ... ... . .413... 1......) ...... ...:wfi... ... I . ......Er...» .....1.... .» .1. “a . .. hit». .. ...... 4 ”...I4v..s...d: ... . .. ...}... ........4.... .I. ..l...: .......I..... .... ...... . . If}... .. .. ...... .254.” ......LA... . 4...... . .n ..v...44r Luff... 4.;4 ....u...tm.mm l 13:433.... . .. 1 .. ... A. . . I . A ...A...h....;fl. ./4 HI.) .1...) 4.5.4.04” ..m. rm ......NL... KIM? . . . . . .. , . . .. ......au. . . ... . .. .... . . . . ... --.... ........r.....J..vn.4 . . I . . . . . . . . .....E... ......Z. I ......ZVLIy ...r..4....nuw . . . . . . ... .. .. . . . ... 7... {14.84.15— I .... . . . . . . . ......L... .. ...olh.....u....;», .7 . .... .. . . . .. . . ... ...yr..4.I.............z. .31... ...-..:.r..1...$ . . . . . . ... . . . .. . . .....I....).4. .m..............:.... .).;.!ar....f . . . . . .. . 34.4 (.42.)....; :1 4 . . .. . I . 4 . . 4. :aJI4HJAA;JnJI .9 . . . . . . .. I .... ..I....:...I.u..v.: . . . .. . . .. . .. . .. . . 4 . II. . . . . I . . . . . 43:4.3fwf4w941. K . .31... ... . x , ... 4.4 4. Cfflfdwr r... .7. . .. . . . ... . I. . ..I v ....v. v. . . . . ... . x . a. ....m... .. .2... 74.4... r. w. ..4 .4.... . . . l . . . . . ., .....1... 1.24451... . . . .. . . ,. .... .. .. . 43. .r... .. . . .. . .. .... ...... . ... .. . . .. ... . .. .. ...” 1.7.3.)... 1.7.4....» 3:... .. . . .. I. . . . f:3....a...v . . , . . . ... . .34.... 7 . . .. . . . . . 79.4. . . . . . . . .. :3... . . . . . ... .. ...4v.........:.. ... ....n. 4.....3... v... . . . 1...... . ... ... :54 ....V... . . .. .. . . .. . . . . . ................. 35.1.}. (4.4........a.».$tl...-..o:..l.4.i .. . .. . . . . . . . ....a I..........I.a. ...4..9....4.4.....4 1.54.4514. ”1... . . . . . .. .. . 1.3.3.3... ....v :24...) 4. .. . ... .. . . .. . . .. . . -4.... a ....I.................... . . . . . . . . .. :......3..........l............ . .W........... «3. 2 . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . 4.1. I. IV .. .. . . . . a I. . fl....!....... . .. . . . . .. ......p..- 1»)... .. ..4iu. — . . . . . . .. . .. .........II...........u.......... .... .....31. 4.74 . .. . . ... ... .....- .... . . . . . _ . . . . I ., ., , . ..... ..........,3 .....1... . ..... 34......,.4w1. . . . . . . . . .. . . . . ..>.. . . . . . . . . . . . . 3.. . . ... v. . ... . .. . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . I . . . . . . . ... .. . . . . .. . . , . . ...... .. . . . . .. . .. . fl? .. . . .. . 1 .. ...._.... ..., ... ... . I... .1. . : ...... . . ... . ...... «...... .rfo f. {.4 . .. .........f... . . . ... ... .. ... . . I.~....I..a. . . . , .....I. ...... . .....I.....;;I.1I ......I.......r::.£ . . . . 1:...)..!.II.L....J...4 . 1.5:-.. ......x. ...r.... . ”...... .....I..A..3.. wityfl . . . .... .5. s {Humviw . . .. WM“? .33....) @fil‘ “I Isiis rem-14 LIBRA 1:. Y 7 Mlchlgan ”1‘ {"912}: University V This is to certify that the thesis entitled CHARACTERIZATION OF THE DEOXYRIBONUCLEIC ACID OF VEGETATIVE CELLS OF AZOTOBACTE’R VI NELAZVDI I presented by Eric S. Berke has been accepted towards fulfillment of the requirements for Ph. D. . Microbiology and Jegree 1n Public Health @745 14,564? J ‘ [Hz/A Major professor _/-' :1 Date September 27, 1972 0-7639 ABSTRACT CHARACTERIZATION OF THE DEOXYRIBONUCLEIC ACID OF VEGETATIVE CELLS OF AZOTOBACTER VINELANDII BY Eric S. Berke A study of the DNA of Azotobacter vinelandii was made. Vegetative cells of A. vinelandii were found to contain 6.7 x 10'-14 grams of DNA per cell and two stain— able nuclear bodies, while cysts contained one half as much DNA and only one nuclear body. The minimal DNA con— tent per Azotobacter cyst is thus an amount eight times that of the E. ggli genome. Melting curves of A. Vinelandii DNA when plotted on normal probability paper show a bimodality, indicating two components with different guanine + cytosine (G+C) contents. Both components are in about equal concentra— tion in the cell, one having 61% G+C and the other 69% G+C. DNA renaturation experiments on A. vinelandii DNA have been shown in this study to deviate from second order kinetics, unlike typical bacteria. Analysis of the data resolved the renaturation curve into the sum of —i—i Eric S. Berke two second order curves, characterized by Cot values l/2 (the initial concentration of DNA times time at the 50% renaturation point) of 1.3 and 8.9 (corrected for G+C effects). This corresponds to unique nucleotide sequence lengths which are 0.4 and 3.1 times as long as that of 9 daltons, the E. col; genome, i.e. 1.2 X 109 and 7.9 X 10 respectively. Deviation from second order kinetics has also been substantiated by the discrepancy between unique sequence sizes obtained from initial renaturation rates and Cot values on A. vinelandii DNA. Initial renatur- 1/2 ation rates of this DNA have indicated a unique sequence size about half the value of that obtained from the Cotl/Z value of the total Azotobacter renaturation. This rate has been shown to correspond to the expected initial rate when two components of Cotl/Z values of 1.3 and 8.9 are present. The slow component of the analyzed renaturation curve (Cot = 8.9) was concentrated by allowing the ‘ 1/2 ; renaturation to proceed to 88% completion and fractionat- i ing the DNA on an hydroxylapatite column. The single- ‘ stranded DNA, unrenatured at the time of fractionation, } consists mainly of the slow component (approximately ‘ 85%) since the greater portion of the fast component =l.3) has renatured by the time of fractionation. (Cotl/Z Eric S. Berke This concentrated slow component was then allowed to renature to completion. Values for unique sequence size were obtained from this renaturation curve. The curve could also be resolved into two components of Cotl/Z values of 1.3 and 8.9 respectively, as was the case for the total Azotobacter renaturation. Attempts to separate the two G+C components of A. vinelandii DNA using CsCl density gradients, NaI gradients and both in combination with a relaxation centrifugation technique were only partially successful since the peaks showed considerable overlap. This was attributable to a shearing of the DNA which was inherent in the purification procedures and a model is presented to account for the poor separation. A number of models are devised to describe the possible organization of the DNA within the cell. CHARACTERIZATION OF THE DEOXYRIBONUCLEIC ACID OF VEGETATIVE CELLS OF AZOTOBACTER VINELANDII BY Eric S. Berke A THESIS Submitted to Michigan State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Department of Microbiology and Public Health 1972 Dedicated to my wife, Nancy ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I wish to thank Dr. Harold Sadoff for his excellent guidance and for the many stimulating discussions we have had during the course of my graduate work. I am grateful to Dr. Roy J. Britten for the opportunity to visit his laboratory to become acquainted with the techniques of DNA renaturation studies. I also wish to acknowledge the informative discussions I have had with Dr. Donald Brenner concerning this work. Lastly, I wish to thank Brian Berke for his technical assistance in preparation of the figures in this thesis for publication. Financial assistance from the National Institute of Health and the Department of Microbiology, Michigan State University, is gratefully acknowledged. DEDICATION . . . ACKNOWLEDGMENTS. . LIST OF TABLES . LIST OF FIGURES. . INTRODUCTION. LITERATURE REVIEW . TABLE OF The Azotobacteriaceae. DNA--Historical Survey Methods of Studying DNA EXPERIMENTAL METHODS 0 Strains and Cultivation . . . . . Determination of DNA Content per Cell . . Nuclear Staining Preparation of DNA. DNA Melting Curves. Preparation of DNA for Renaturation . . . Renaturation Techniques . . . Hydroxylapatite Fractionation of Double and Single Stranded DNA . . Density Gradient Centrifugation . . . . Analysis of G+C Contents. . . . . . . RESULTS . . . CCONTENTS o a a o o o 0 DNA Content per A. vinelandii Cell Number of Stainable'NUclear Bodies per Cell DNA per Nuclear Body DNA Melting Curves. DNA Renaturation Experiments . . . . . Density Gradient Centrifugation . . iv Page ii Page DISCUSSION I O O O O O O O O O O O I O 57 Melting Curves . . . . . . . . . . . 58 DNA Renaturation . . . . . . . . . . 59 Density Gradient Centrifugations . . . 61 Models for Cellular Organization of the DNA . 62 Approaches to Resolving the Validity of the Final Model . . . . . . . . . . . 65 SUMMARY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 67 LIST OF REFERENCES. . . . . . . . . . . . 69 APPENDICES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 74 A. A Model for the Estimation of G+C Content Differences of the Two Components of A. vinelandii . . . . . . . . . . 76 B. Some Aspects of the Theory of Renatura- tion of DNA. . . . . . . . . . . 85 C. Physiological Studies of Encystment in Azotobacter vinelandii . . . . . . . 89 Table l. LIST OF TABLES DNA content per cell of A. vinelandii vi 'Page 27 LIST OF FIGURES Figure Page 1. DNA melting curve for E. coli, Ag, aeruginosa and a mixture of the two DNAs. . . . . . 30 2. DNA melting curve for A. agilis and A. vinelandii DNA. . . . . . . . . . . 32 3. 'Normal probability plot of DNA melting data for E. coli, Ag. aeruginosa and a mixture of the two DNAs . . . . . . . . . . . 34 4. Normal probability plot of DNA melting data for A, agilis and A, vinelandii DNA. . . . 36 5. Kinetics of reassociation of E. coli DNA . . 39 6. Kinetics of reassociation of A. vinelandii DNA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43 7. A comparison of the reassociation kinetics of A. vinelandii with the sum of two ideal second order reaction kinetic curves . . . 45 8. Kinetics of reassociation of fractionated A. vinelandii DNA enriched for the slowly renaturing component. . . . . . . . . 49 9. CsCl density gradient centrifugation of sheared and "unsheared" A. vinelandii DNA. . 53 lO. CsCl density gradient centrifugation of a mixture of E. coli and Ag. aeruginosa DNA sheared and "unsheared" . . . . . . . 56 11. Models for the possible organization of DNA in A. vinelandii. . . . . . . . . . 64 12. The theoretical DNA denaturation curve for a mixture of two DNAs with a large differ- ence in G+C content. . . . . . . . . 79 vii Figure 13. 14. The theoretical DNA denaturation curve for a mixture of two DNAs with an intermediate difference in G+C content . . . . . . The theoretical DNA denaturation curve for a mixture of two DNAs with a small differ- ence in G+C content . . . . . . . . viii Page 81 83 INTRODUCTION Azotobacter vinelandii is a nitrogen-fixing soil organism capable of encystment (39, 46, 53). The encyst- ment process can be induced by growth on B-hydroxybutyrate (BHB), butanol and other related compounds (25). Growth of A. vinelandii vegetative cells on BHB results in a final cell division (41), loss of flagella, accumulation of poly-Bchydroxybutyrate and formation of outer cyst layers to form a mature cyst. Cysts are thick-walled, spherical, resting cells which are highly resistant to ultraviolet light, sonication, and dessication (47). Although both cysts and spores are eubacterial resting cells, cysts differ from spores in that they are not heat resistant, contain no dipicolinic acid (46) and loss of calcium has no effect on their viability and dessica- . tion resistance. The suspension of cysts in glucose and nitrogen- free salts solution (Burk's buffer) stimulates germination and outgrowth to form vegetative cells. Such cells are large (3 x 1 pm), rod-shaped, gram negative, highly motile and obligately aerobic. The life cycle of A. vinelandii has been compared to sporulation in Bacillus species and has been used as a model system for studying cellular differentiation. DNA levels during encystment have been investigated (41) and the DNA content of the resting Azotobacter cyst has 14 been determined to be 3.4 x 10- grams while vegetative cells have 2 to 4 times this amount (41). Similar DNA contents per cell from synchronous cultures of A. vinelandii cells have been reported by Zaitseva (54). Muller and Kern (35) found comparable levels of DNA in radiation resistant mutants of Azotobacter chroococcum. Presumably the cyst contains the minimal amount of DNA needed for the cell to survive. Nuclear staining (41) has shown the cyst to have one stainable nuclear body, probably corresponding to one genomic unit. This amount of DNA is about 8 times that of the E. coli genome. It is unlikely that A. vinelandii has a range of biochemical capabilities 8 fold greater than E. coli and this fact, coupled with the high levels of DNA per cell, has led to the present study into the nature of the DNA of A. vinelandii. A number of other reports have suggested that the DNA of A. vinelandii might differ from other bacteria. Mishra and Wyss (33, 34) have reported difficulty in obtaining A. vinelandii mutants. Gunter and Kohn (19) have shown A. agilis to exhibit multiple—hit survival curves when subjected to x-irradiation, unlike other , 1 _ -..”... —--L - - ._r _. if —= _-_— ._ bacteria which show single-hit curves. Pochon (39) has described the Azotobacter "nucleus" to be vessicular in nature and similar to the yeast nucleus in appearance. ‘It was the aim of this research to characterize the DNA of A. vinelandii in terms of: G+C content, unique nucleotide sequence size and renaturation kinetics. LITERATURE REVIEW The Azotobacteriaceae Much of the early work on the family Azoto— bacteriaceae was concerned with the groups' ability to fix nitrogen. Although other organisms such as blue- green algae, purple and green bacteria and some Clostridium and Desulfovibrio species also fix nitrogen, few incorporate as much as the Azotobacter species (21). Six species of Azotobacter have been described in the literature: Azoto- bacter vinelandii, Azotobacter beijerinkii, Azotobacter chroococcum, Azotobacter insignis, Azotobacter macrocyto- genes, and Azotobacter agilis. Although these six species are all classified as Azotobacter, there is considerable evidence to indicate that they should not all be grouped together. DeLey and Park (16) have shown by analysis of DNA base ratios and DNA hybridization among the strains that the Azotobacteriaceae should really be divided into 3 groups. The vinelandii-beijerinkii-chroococcum group consists of organisms having a range of 65.7 i 0.8% G+C and hybridizable with PSeudomonas putida DNA to the extent of 40-50%. The insignis—macrocytogenes group has G+C contents ranging from 57-58.6%. These strains are 50-60% hybridizable with Ag. putida DNA. The third group consists of the insignis strain which has 52.9 i 0.4% G+C and is 4 about 30% hybridizable with Ag. putida DNA. DeLey has suggested that only the first group be designated Agggg- bacter while the other two groups should be termed Azomonas and Azotococcus respectively. A. vinelandii, the organism used in this study, was first isolated in 1904 by Lipman (26). The organism is a large rod or peanut—shaped cell with an average size of 3 x l um. It is highly motile by peritrichous flagel- lation (4), produces a soluble pigment which fluoresces apple—green under ultraviolet light (16) and undergoes a life cycle involving a dessication resistant, resting cell known as a cyst. Relatively little research has been carried out on the DNA of A. vinelandii. Olson and Wyss (37) frac— tionated the nucleic acids from dormant and germinated cysts of Azotobacter on methylated albumin-kieselguhr (MAK) columns and noted changes in DNA configuration after germination. Pochon (39), in light microscope studies, showed the nuclear body of A. vinelandii to possess a number of chromatinic granules making up a vessicular nucleus. During cell division the nuclear material takes the form of two or four large rods which divide with the cell and then fragment to reform the vessicular nucleus. DNA——Historical Survey In the late 1800's, F. Miescher (32), while study— ing the cell nucleus in animal cells, was the first to isolate and chemically characterize pure DNA from salmon sperm. The purines and pyrimidines comprising DNA were isolated in the late 1800's by Kossel (5) and later the deoxyribonucleotides and deoxyribonucleosides corresponding to the four bases were isolated and characterized. The tetranucleotide model for DNA structure was relatively long—lived. It was suggested in 1909 (20) and disproved in 1948 (21). Briefly this model represented nucleic acids as high molecular weight compounds composed of a large number of tetranucleotides in sequence similar to the amino acids in a protein. In 1944, Avery, MacLeod and McCarty (3) showed DNA to be the agent responsible for Pneumococcal trans- formation and in so doing established the chemical nature of genes. Soon thereafter the composition of DNA was further elucidated by the observations of Vischer gE_gA. (48) that adenine and thymine and guanine and cytosine showed equal molar proportions (i.e. adenine and thymine concentrations were always equal as were guanine and cytosine concentrations). The present model for DNA structure, commonly called the Watson-Crick structure (49), can be summarized as follows: l. The amount of adenine equals the amount of thymine and the amount of guanine equals the amount of cytosine. 2. Adenine pairs only with thymine and guanine pairs only with cytosine. 3. The DNA molecule consists of two right-handed helical polynucleotide chains of opposite polarity (i.e. internucleotide linkage in one strand is 3' to 5' and 5' to 3' in the other). 4. Bases are on the inside of the chain and a purine on one strand always pairs with a pyrimidine on the other. 5. The distance between base pairs is 3.4 A and there are ten bases per turn of the helix. Methods of Studying DNA Since the Watson-Crick model, many techniques have been developed to study and Characterize the DNAs of various organisms. Native DNA molecules undergo a process called denaturation in the presence of a number of agents, Viz increased temperature, addition of hydroxyl or hydrogen ions and a large variety of organic reagents. Denatura- tion involves the transition of native double-stranded DNA to single—stranded DNA through hydrogen bond breakage between purine-pyrimidine pairs. A considerable amount of information about the DNA of an organism can be obtained from a DNA melting curve (thermal denaturation curve). Typically this technique involves the heating of a solution of DNA (at neutral pH) from room temperature to some higher temperature (usually about 100C) until no further strand separation is observed. Melting curves are carried out in an ultraviolet spectrophotometer where the change in absorbance at 260nm is used to monitor the strand separation. As strand separation proceeds, the absorbance at 260mm increases due to the "unstacking" of the bases in the molecule. Melting curves are sigmoidal in shape and are characterized by the position of their midpoints (Tm, the temperature at which half the DNA is denatured) and the steepness of the slope at this point. Changes in ionic strength of the solvent or addition of various denaturing agents will shift the position of the TM for any DNA. Marmur and Doty (29) have shown that there is a linear relationship between the base composi— tion (G+C%) and T Thus the G+C content of a DNA can M‘ be determined by obtaining its TM in a solvent of known ionic strength. Another parameter obtainable from a DNA melting curve is the degree of hyperchromicity exhibited by the DNA sample. The hyperchromic shift as it is called is represented by the percentage of absorbancy (at 260nm) increase seen following denaturation. This parameter is also dependent on the G+C content of the native DNA, with DNAs of higher G+C contents having lower hyperchromi— cities (e.g. a DNA of 63% G+C has a hyperchromicity of 29% while a DNA of 51% G+C has a hyperchromicity of 39%). DNA melting curves may also be analyzed by the method of Knittel (22). This technique involves plotting thermal melting data on normal probability paper. Gaussian distributions when plotted in this way give a straight line. Melting data yields a straight line and allows for accurate determination of Tm and a rapid determ— ination of the standard deviation of the compositional distribution of the DNA. Such plots may also be used to reveal compositional heterogeneity if a broken line is obtained. Russel gE_gA. (40) have described another technique which allows for the calculation of the base composition of nucleotide sequences which melt in different portions of the DNA melting curve. Briefly the method consists of obtaining ultraviolet wavelength scans from 245 to 280nm at a number of temperatures along the melting curve. A formula based on the molar extinction coefficients of AT and GC pairs at various wavelengths, is used to determine the base composition of DNA melting during any temperature increment along the melting curve. Among the most recent techniques employed in DNA research is the study of the kinetics of the reassocia- tion of DNA. This technique was first employed by 10 Britten (9) and others in the middle 1960's to show the presence of repeated nucleotide sequences in the DNAs of many higher organisms. DNA, when denatured to its single-stranded state and incubated at fairly high salt concentrations, will reassociate (return to its double- stranded form). The process involves the random colli- sion of single—stranded fragments until a complementary sequence of base pairs is encountered and bonding between the base pairs results in double—stranded DNA. DNA renaturation (reassociation) follows second order kinetics (see Appendix B). Marmur gE_gA. (30) originally explored the conditions necessary for efficient reassociation and others (9, 50, 51) have further refined the techniques. The requirements for reassociation are: 1. An adequate concentration of cations (renatur- ation is blocked below 0.01 M sodium ion), 2. An incubation temperature high enough to weaken intrastrand secondary structure (optimal renaturation temperature is about 25C below the temperature for dissociation of DNA) , 3. An incubation time and DNA concentration suf- ficient to allow an adequate number of col— lisions to take place, 11 4. A homogeneous population of DNA fragments about 500 nucleotides in length (the larger the fragment the faster the rate). A DNA renaturation experiment would thus involve, DNA purification, shearing to small fragment size (about 500 nucleotides), dialysis against a suitable buffer, denaturation of DNA and the monitoring of the reassocia— tion of the strands. The reassociation of DNA can be assayed in a number of ways, each dependent on some detectable difference between double (reassociated) and single (unreassociated) stranded DNA. For example, one of the most commonly used techniques is ultraviolet spectrophotometry (30). This method is based on the fact that dissociated (denatured) DNA absorbs more ultraviolet light than reassociated DNA (at 260nm). Thus renaturation reactions are carried out in water jacketed thermal cuvettes in a spectrophotometer and the absorbance at 260nm is monitored. This technique has the advantage of requiring little DNA (about 80 ug). Another commonly used technique takes advantage of the fact that single and double stranded DNAs can be separated on an hydroxylapatite (calcium phosphate) column (9). Thus renaturation is followed by removing samples from a DNA solution which is renaturing and fractionating the double and single stranded DNA on hydroxylapatite. This procedure provides an estimate 12 of how much DNA has renatured. This technique has the advantage that the DNA concentration can be increased greatly over the spectrophotometric method so that slow renaturations can be Speeded up. It also allows for fractionation of DNA species of different renaturation rates. A third technique which may be used is the DNA— agar method (31). Long strands of DNA are physically immobilized on a support substance and radioactivity labeled fragments of single stranded DNA are added. Following various incubation times the unbound labeled fragments are washed away and the bound radioactivity is assayed by standard techniques. DNA renaturation kinetics can be characterized as follows: 1. The renaturation reaction follows second order kinetics, 2. The maximum rate of renaturation occurs 25C below the dissociation temperature of the 'DNA, 3. Decreasing the molecular weight of the fragments, decreases the rate of the reaction, 4. Renaturation rate decreases as the genetic complexity of the source increases (i.e. as the unique sequence size increases), l3 5. The rate is very dependent on ionic strength below 0.4 M sodium ion. The unique sequence length of the DNA of an organism can be obtained from the results of a renatura— tion experiment. The % renaturation is plotted on semi— logarithmic paper versus Cot (the initial DNA concentra- tion in moles of nucleotides/liter times time).* The Cot value at which 50% reassociation has taken place is termed the Cot and is characteristic of each organism. This 1/2 value is indicative of the minimal length of the unique sequence of the organism's DNA or in the case of most bacteria the genome size. A. ggii DNA is used as a standard Since its genome size has been measured quite accurately by Cairns (13). The shape of a renaturation curve is important in determining whether an organism contains repeated base sequences in its DNA. NOn—repeated DNA, characteristic of most procaryotes, gives the typi- cal second order S-shaped plot. Encaryotic DNAs have been shown to deviate from second order kinetics. This is easily visualized in most eucaryotes where the curve is biphasic. For example, calf DNA shows a biphasic renatur- ation curve (10). Forty percent of the calf DNA has already reassociated at a Cot value of 2. Little * As a general rule, dissociated DNA of OD260 = 2 renatured for 1 hour in 1 SSC at the optimal re— naturation temperature gives a Cot of l. l4 renaturation takes place between values of 2 and 200. The remaining 60% has a Cotl/Z of about 3000. The rapidly reassociating fraction of calf DNA has a Cotl/Z of 0.03 as compared to 3000 for the slow fraction. Thus the concentration of DNA sequences which reassociate rapidly is 100,000 times the concentration of those which renature slowly. Therefore 40% of the calf genome con- sists of unique sequences repeated about 100,000 times. To date all procaryotic DNAs studied have shown no redundant DNA, while all eucaryotic DNAs have contained repeated DNA sequences. The function of repeated sequences in DNA is unknown. A number of possible roles have been suggested. Multiple copies of a gene would allow for higher rates of synthesis. This might be necessary for the synthesis of structural proteins found in large amounts in the cell, or for ribosomal RNA. Multiple similar copies could pro- duce a class of proteins which were similar such as antibody proteins. Britten (8) has also suggested the possibility of highly repetitive DNA sequences having a regulatory role. Finally, Crick (10) has proposed that repeated DNA sequences play a structural role by inter- acting with the chromosomal proteins in eucaryotes. Initial rates of a renaturation reaction can be used to obtain unique sequence sizes on non-repeated DNA. 15 Gillis (18) and Brenner (6) have determined genome sizes for a number of bacteria using this method. Density gradient centrifugation is of value in studying DNA (42), since the buoyant density of DNA in CsCl is directly proportional to its G+C content. This technique is used to determine the G+C contents of an unknown DNA and to effect the separation of DNAs of vary- ing G+C contents. A modification of the CsCl buoyant density centrifugations is the density gradient relaxa— tion method as described by Anet (1). This technique takes advantage of the facts that the "steepness" of the gradient formed is dependent on the Speed of centrifuga- tion and that CsCl diffuses rapidly relative to the dif- fusion of DNA. Operationally, centrifugation is first performed at a high speed to form the gradient and separate and concentrate the 2 DNA species. The rota- tional velocity is then brought to the lower value to form the desired density gradient. The final gradient is quickly formed following change over to the slower speed. DNA molecules in such a gradient seek their new densities after relaxation (slow speed) and thus the time required for a density gradient run is shortened. Anet (2) has also described the use of sodium iodide gradients with and without ethidium bromide to separate DNA, mixtures. Ethidium bromide intercalates in DNA and l6 lessens its buoyant density. Anet was thus able to separate more efficiently mixtures of DNAs of different G+C contents, since high G+C DNAs take up less ethidium bromide than lower G+C DNAs. EXPERIMENTAL METHODS Strains and Cultivation A. vinelandii (ATCC 12837) was grown from a single isolated cyst from a laboratory stock culture. Cells were grown on Burk's nitrogen—free medium plus 0.5% glucose at 30C on a rotary shaker with 100-200 milliliters of culture medium per 500 milliliter flask. Larger batches were grown in a 3 liter fermenter (New Brunswick Scientific Co., New Brunswick, New Jersey) or in a 100 liter pilot— plant fermenter (Stainless and Steel Products Co., St. Paul, Minn.). Cells were harvested in a continuous—flow centrifuge (The Sharples Corp., Philadelphia, Pa.). Burk‘s nitrogen-free medium as described by Wilson and Knight (52) is made up of the following ingredients: KH21304 0.2 gm/l KZHPO4 0.8 " MgSO4°7H20 0.2 " CaSO4'2H20 0.1 " FeSO4'7H20 5.0 mg/l Na2M004'2H20 0.25 " Glucose was dissolved in distilled water and sterilized by filtration. A. coli K12 and Pseudonomas aeruginosa were grown on nutrient broth in shake flasks at 30C. 17 18 Determination of DNA Content per Cell Three methods were employed in determining the DNA content of A. vinelandii cells. These were grown in Burk's medium to late log phase and cell numbers Were assessed by direct counts in a Petroff—Hauser counting chamber and by dilution plating. In the first method, the culture was chilled, cells harvested and washed by centri- fugation in 0.1M tris- 0.1M NaCl buffer (pH 9) and resus- pended in the same buffer. Cold 10% sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) was added to give 1% SDS and the suspension was stirred for 20 minutes in an ice bath. An equal volume of cold water-saturated phenol was added and the mixture stirred for another 20 minutes, after which the aqueous and phenol layers were separated by centrifugation. The aqueous layer was precipitated with cold ethanol, the precipitate resuspended in 0.1M NaCl and DNA assayed by the diphenylamine assay of Burton (12). A second method involved extraction of a known number of cells with 10% trichloroacetic acid (TCA) at 95C for 15 minutes and DNA levels determined by the Burton method. The third method estimated DNA per cell using a modification of the Schmidt-Thannhauser nucleic acid fractionation (42). Cells were harvested as before and washed twice with Burk's buffer (Burk's medium without 19 glucose). The cells were resuspended in 7% cold TCA (30 ml) and were stirred for 20 minutes in the cold. The mixture was centrifuged and the pellet reextracted with 30 ml 10% TCA. The pellet obtained from centrifugation was suspended in 5 ml of water and 20 ml of 95% ethanol and centrifuged. One extraction with 25 ml of 100% ethanol, and three extractions with ethanolzether (321) were carried out at room temperature with stirring. The precipitate was then collected by centrifugation and hydrolized for 15 hours at 37C in 1N KOH. Following hydrolysis the solution was neutralized with HCl and the DNA precipitated with 1 volume of 5% TCA and the precipi- tate washed twice with 5 ml 5% TCA by centrifugation. The final pellet was extracted twice with 5% TCA at 90C for 15 minutes, cooled and centrifuged. Supernatants contained the DNA and were assayed by the diphenylamine method of Burton, an inorganic phosphorus assay and the indole assay. Nuclear Staining Nuclear staining of A. vinelandii cells was per- formed by a modification of the procedures of Piekarski (38). Cells were air dried on clean slides and fixed in 70% ethanol for 1 hour. Hydrolysis of cellular RNA was then carried out by incubation in IN HCl for 30 minutes at 60C. After washing with water the cells were 20 stained with Giemsa stain for 5-10 minutes. Concentrated Giemsa stain is prepared by mixing 0.5 grams Giemsa with 33 ml glycerol and 33 ml methanol and heating for 2 hours at 60C. Diluted Giemsa is used for staining and consists of one drop of concentrated Giemsa stain per 1 ml 0.1 M phosphate buffer pH 6.8. With this technique cell cyto— plasm appears sky blue and nuclei dark purple. -Preparation of DNA Cells were harvested in late log phase, washed and frozen. A modification of the Marmur technique (28) for DNA purification was used with two additional RNAse incubations (100 ug/ml RNase for 1 hour at 37C) and a pronase treatment using 100 ug/ml of the enzyme. The pronase was self-digested for two hours at 37C to rid it of DNAse prior to treating the DNA overnight at 37C. DNA purity was monitored by observation of ultra— violet spectra where the 260/280 nm ratio was required to be close to 2. DNA was assayed by a number of methods including Burton's diphenylamine assay (12), Ceriotti's indole assay (14) and a modification of the Schmitt- Thannhauser inorganic phosphorus assay of Schneider (44). RNA was assayed by the orcinol method for pentose (11) and protein was assayed by the method of Lowry (27). DNA was considered pure when RNA and protein levels were less than 1% of the total preparation. DNA preparations were stored at ~20C. 21 DNA Melting Curves All DNA melts were carried out in 0.1 x SSC* buffer. DNA solutions with an absorbance of approximately 0.5 (at 260 nm) were placed in jacketed cuvettes (Arthur Thomas Co., Philadelphia, Pa.) of 1 cm light path for temperature control during observation. The cuvettes were placed in an Hitachi DB spectrophotometer and the temper- ature controlled by an insulated circulating water bath (Sargeant Co., Detroit, Mich.). The temperature of the solution in the cuvette was monitored using a YSI therm- ister thermometer with the probe cemented into the cuvette plug (Yellow Springs Industries, Yellow Springs, Ohio). The absorbance at 260 nm was read and the temper- ature raised quickly to about 10C below the onset of the melting region. The temperature was then raised in approximately lC increments, allowing 10 minutes for equilibration at each temperature. The optical density at 260 nm was read at each temperature and corrected for thermal expansion (Vt/V25C)' Data were plotted on both rectangular coordinate paper and on normal probability paper by the method of Knittel (22). Scan melts used in the method of Russel (40) were carried out as above and at each temperature values for optical density at 245 to 280 nm in 5 nm increments were obtained. *ssc buffer is 0.15M nac1 plus 0.015M sodium citrate pH 7. - 22 Preparation of DNA for Renaturation Shearing of DNA was accomplished by two passages through a French pressure cell (American Instrument Co., Silver Springs, Md.) at 15,000 lbs/in2. To minimize DNA denaturation during the shearing process, the DNA was dissolved in 5 x SSC buffer and the pressure cell was cooled in ice before use. Following shearing DNA samples were dialyzed to equilibrium against 0.1 x SSC buffer. Renaturation Techniques The reassociation of DNA was assayed spectro- photometrically. sheared DNA in 0.1 x SSC buffer was denatured by heating at 100C for 5 minutes. The DNA was immediately diluted with an amount of 10 x SSC buffer which yielded a final concentration of 2 x SSC buffer and an optical density of 1.5 - 2.0 at 260 nm. The DNA was then transferred to a water—jacketed cuvette preheated to the desired renaturation temperature in the spectrophotom— eter. The total time necessary for mixing and transfer of the DNA to cuvettes was about 2 minutes. Optical densities at 260 nm were read every 5 minutes for the first hour (for initial renaturation rates) and every half—hour thereafter. 23 Hydroxylapatite Fractionation of Double and Single Stranded DNA Sheared DNA in 0.14 M sodium phosphate buffer, pH 7 was renatured in a sealed vial. The sample was placed on a thermal jacketed hydroxylapatite column (Biorad Laboratories, Richomnd, Calif.) maintained at the temperature of renaturation and equilibrated with 0.14 M sodium phosphate buffer, pH 7. The sample was washed through the column with 2 ml portions of the same buffer to stOp the renaturation and fractionate double and single stranded DNA. The absorbances of the eluates was moni- tored at a wavelength of 260 nm. When the absorbance of column eluates had returned to a basal level, the column was washed with 0.4 M sodium phosphate buffer pH 7 in 2 ml aliquots and monitored as above. A fractionation of double (renatured) and single (unrenatured) stranded DNA was obtained by this method. Single stranded DNA was eluted in the 0.14 M phosphate buffer and double stranded DNA was eluted from the column with 0.4 M phosphate buffer. Density Gradient Centrifugation Cesium chloride (CsCl) density gradient centrifu- gation was carried out by the method of Ganesan and Lederberg (17). Optical grade CsCl was used (Schwartz- Mann Bioresearch, Orangeburg, N.Y.) and the average density in the tubes was 1.72 grams/m1. DNA in SSC buffer was added in amounts from about 75 to 200 ug. A 24 total of 4.5 ml of CsCl was pipetted into 5 ml capacity nitrocellulose centrifuge tubes and layered with mineral oil. Tubes were spun in an SW39 head in the Beckman Model L refrigerated ultracentrifuge at 30,000 rpm for 80 hours at 15C. Tubes were pierced, drops collected, diluted with distilled water, and the absorbance at 260 nm monitored. An alternate method involved centrifugation at 41,000 rpm for 24 hours at 15C in the SW 50L head. Fractionation was performed as above. Both of these methods were tried using the density gradient relaxation method of Anet (l) in an attempt to effect better separation of the DNA components. Sodium iodide gradients with ethidium bromide (2) were also used in combination with the density gradient relaxation technique (1). In this case DNA samples were spun in a type 50 angle head at 50,000 rpm for 20 hours followed by a centrifugation at 35,000 rpm for 50 hours at 15C. Average density of the gradient was 1.55 grams/ml and a total of 5.6 mls per polyalymer tube was used. Analysis of G+C Contents G+C contents were analyzed spectrophotometrically by the method of Hirshman (20). In this method DNA is heated above the temperature at which it is completely denatured and the absorbance values at 240 to 280 nm in 25 10 nm increments is determined. From these data one can calculate the G+C content of the denatured DNA. RESULTS DNA Content per A. vinelandii Cell DNA content per cell was determined by three methods: a phenol DNA extraction, a hot TCA extraction and a modification of the Schmitt-Thannhauser fractionation with the DNA supernate assayed by three different DNA methods. The phenol extraction gave a value of 6.7 x 10-14 grams per cell (corrected for a yield of about 70%). Hot 14 TCA extraction gave 6 x 10_ 'grams/cell. The third method 14 gave results of 6.6 x 10_ grams (Burton diphenylamine l4 assay), 6.7 x 10- grams (inorganic phOSphate assay) and 6.3 x 10_14 grams (indole assay) per cell (Table 1). Number of Stainable Nuclear Bodies per Cell The number of nuclear bodies per cell were determined from the same cultures used for DNA assay by the nuclear staining technique described. Cells in early exponential phase were found to contain as many as four nuclear bodies per cell while late exponential cells had two nuclear bodies. Cysts always contained one nuclear body. The amount of DNA in the cyst is presumably the minimal amount of DNA necessary for maintenance of the cell. 26 27 TABLE l.-—DNA content per cell of A. vinelandii. DNA Extraction Method DNA Assay Method DNA/Cell l. Phenol Diphenylamine 6.7 10-14* 2. Hot TCA Diphenylamine 6.0 10-14 3. Schmitt—Thannhauser Diphenylamine 6.6 10—14 Schmitt—Thannhauser Inorganic phosphorus 6.7 10”14 Schmitt—Thannhauser Indole 6.3 10—14 * Corrected for estimated yield of 70%. 28 DNA per Nuclear Body From the amount of DNA per cell and the number of nuclear bodies per cell, the amount of DNA per nuclear body was calculated to be about 3.3 x 10_14 grams. This represents a value about 8 times that of the A. coli genome. DNA Melting Curves DNA melting curves were obtained as described. The results are shown in Figures 1 and 2. All curves appear as typical S-shaped curves when plotted on rectangular coordinates except for the mixed melt of A. SEA; (G+C = 51%) and Ag. aeruginosa (G+C = 68%) in Figure l. The hyperchromic shift of A. agilis (Figure 2) is low probably due to low purity. Figures 3 and 4 are sama data plotted on normal probability paper by the method of Knittel. Figure 3 shows the melting curve of an approximately equal mixture of the DNA of A. ggAA and Ag. aeruginosa. The normal probability plots in Figures 3 and 4 are straight lines only in the case of A. ggAA, A.agilis, and Ag. aeruginosa. The mixed melt as expected is biphasic as is the A. vinelandii plot (Figure 4). While the mixed melt has a plateau region where no DNA is melting the A. vinelandii plot shows a break at about 54% of the total absorbance increase. 29 Figure l.-—DNA melting curve for A. coli, 5. aeruginosa and a mixture of the two DNAs. _E_:. coli DNA (m) , Ps. aeruginosa DNA (I—.) and an approximate equal mixture of the two DNAs (fl). See'text for ex- perimental details. 30 |.5 L4!- _ - _ 3. 2. l. EcomN ....4 woz_._.<.._mm LO 80 TEMPERATURE (°c). 75 31 Figure 2.--DNA melting curve for A. agilis and A. vinelandi DNA A. a ilis DNA (...-7 and A. vinelEndiTL DNA (OI—u. . See text for experimental details. 32 fi l l 80 TEMPERATURE (° C) l _L 75 70 E . L _ 4 3 2 I. a: com 2 mozN- ” ACETATE GROWN " “Z, 0.02 - - 0.0l I I I l t 1 l 300 310 320 330 340 io” l/T FIG. 4. Arrhenius plot of the effect of temperature over the range 25 to 48 C 0n the activities of 0.045 units of BHB dehydrogenase from acetate grown cells and 0.055 units from encysting A. vinelandii. The activ- ities are expressed as equivalent units (37 C). TABIi-i 2. Properties of B-hydroxybutyrate (BHB) dehydrogenase oj'Azotobacter vinelandii Source p2u0£E,i- K,“ (mM)” Rmr Encysting cells ...... 9.0 4.0 0.38 Acetate—grown cells . . 9.0 5.5 0.38 “The enzyme (0.05 units) was assayed over a pH range of 7.5 to l 1.0 in 0.05 M Tris-glycine buffer. ” Michaelis constants for either enzyme were deter- mined with 0.02 to 0.05 units of enzyme over a BHB dehydrogenase concentration range of0.001 to 0.03 M. "Mobility relative to bromophenol blue in electro- phoresis on 5% acrylamide gel at pH 8.3. VOL. 105, 1971 as much DNA per nucleoid as does Escherichia coli(10). Similar DNA contents for synchronous cultures of A. vinelandii have been reported by Zaitseva et al. (24). Muller and Kern ([3) ob— served that the DNA contents of various radia- tion resistant mutants of A. chroococcum ranged from 10‘" to 19 X 10'“1 g/cell. Despite these corroborative findings, we considered the pos- sibility that the high values of DNA content per cell were artifacts of the assay procedure. If the hot trichloroacetic acid used to hydrolyze the cell DNA also hydrolyzed a part of the cell envelope, the values for the DNA assay might have been inordinately high. Therefore, we extracted DNA from 100 ml ofa culture in late exponential growth phase and, after a standard DNA assay, calcu- lated the DNA per cell. To detect contamination of the DNA preparation by the cells” lipopolysac- charide, we monitored hexosamine content of our precipitated DNA and the aqueous phase from which it was precipitated. Only 1.3% of the hexos- amine-containing material originally present in the aqueous phase was precipitated with the DNA. Assuming a 70% yield of DNA on extraction, we calculated that late exponential cells of A. vine- landii contain 6.7 x 10‘H g of DNA/cell. Since these cells contained an average of two nucleoids per cell, the individual nucleoids must have con- tained 3.4 x 10‘” g of DNA. This value is identi— cal to that which we have obtained for encysting cells and cysts oI'A. vinelandii by our DNA assay. The relatively large mass of the A. vinelandii nucleoid suggests that there may be considerable redundancy in its genome and may account for the difficulty in obtaining mutants of this orga- nism(l I. 12). A(‘KNO\\"I.EI)(;M EN'I‘ This investigation was supported by Public ”Ctlllh Sersice research grant Al-01863 from the National Institute of .=\||ergy .ind InlectioUs Diseases. National institutes of Health. Ii. B. was :i predoctoral trainee. supported by Public Health Service grant (EM-01911 from the National Institute o|'(ieneral Medical Sciences. LITERATITRE (11111) I. Bernlohr. R. W. 1964. Post logarithmic phase metabolism ol‘ sporu- Ititing microorganisms. l. Protease of Bacillus li'i'lit'iii‘torniis. .1. Biol. Chem. 2392538 543. 2. Burton, K. 1956. A study of the conditions and mechanism of the ENCYSTMENT IN A. ‘N T 7: II. v «J C 30. IJ _ Mtiller. II. P., , Rondle. C . Sadoll. 11. 1... . \Vheiit. R. “L. l:. 1.. Rollins. .I. M. Leatherssood. and R . Wilson, 1’. . \Vyss‘. 0.. M. (i. VINELA NDII I89 diphenylamine reaction for the colorimetric estimation of deoxy- ribonucleic acid Biochem. .l. 62:31.5 333. (liirls..1 M.. .lr. I964. 1".\PCI'IIIICIIIAII biochemistry. W. 121. Freeman and Co. Sun 1- rancisco. Dasis. B. .l. 1964. Disc electrophoresis. 11. Method and application to human serum proteins. Ann. NY. Acad. Sci 1212-404 437. . Doi. R.. 11. l'ItthUFMHI. and 8. Church. 1959, Intermediate metabolism of aerobic spores. III. The mechanism of glucose and he\ose phos- phate oxidation in extracts ol Bacillus (‘t’rL’IM‘ spores. .1. Bacteriol. 77:43 54. . Ilitchins, V. N1. and il. L. Sadoff. I970. MorphogeneSIs of cysts in .Atznmbucter vinelandii. J. Bacteriol. 1042492 49x. . .Iurlshuk. P.. S, Manning. and C. R. Barrera. 1968‘. Isolation and purification of the I)(-)d-hydrosybutyric dehydrogenase ol' '1.‘itl()- bacter l'IIIt’ltIflt/ll. (an. .I. Microbiol. 142775 733. . Is'iclgiiard. N. 0.. 0. Miialpe. and M. Schtiechter. I958. The trun» sition between different physiological states during balanced growth of Salmonella Iyphimurium. J. Gen. Microbiol. 192607 616. . Lin. L. P., and H. L. Sadoff. I968. tncystment and polymer produc- tion by Azotobacter vinelandii in the presence of ii-liydrmy butyrate. J. Bacteriol. 9522336 3343. Matilyie. 0.. synthesis. W. A. Benitimin. Inc.. Ne“ York. and N. O. Isielgtitird. I966. ('ontrol oI~ macromolecular . Mishra. A. is.. and 0, Wyss. I968. Induced mutations II'I .Alzumhaclt'r and isolation of km adenine mutant, The NucIcUs 11:96 105. requiring . Mishra. A. K. and 0. Wyss. 1969. An adenine requiring mutant of xim/abort” vinelandii blocked in inosinic acid synthesis. Experientia 21:85. and H. Isern. I967. Strahlenresisteng. (jehalt und Basen/usammensel/ung der DNA einiger strahlendurzierter Mu- taten yon Amtobacterchroococcum. Z. Naturl‘orsch. 2221330 1336. . Piekarski. (i. 1937. Cytologishe lintersuchungeii an I’aratyphus und Colibakterien. Arch. Mikrobiol. 8:428 439. .I. M.. and W. T. .1. Morgan. 1955 The determination ol' glucosaminc and galtictosaminc. Biochetii. J. 612586 589. A. I). l-Iitchins. and 1:. (‘clikkol 1969, Properties of fructose l.()-(IIPIIL).\ph;IIC .ildoliiscs from spores and vegetative cells of Bacillus cereus. .1 Bacteriol. 98:130H 1318. . Socolol‘sky. M. D., and O. Wyss. 1962. Res‘istance of the .II:otoba(tcr cyst. J. Bacteriol. 84:119 134. . Tchan. Y. '11. A. Birch-Andersen. and H. 1.. Jensen. 1962. The ultra- structure of Vegetative cells and cysts oI .elmtobucter citmncm't‘tmi. Arch. Mikrobiol. 43:50 66 Umbreit, \‘v. Vb. T. H. Burns. and .1. 1'. Staull’cr. I964. Munuiiietric techniques. Burgess I’ublis‘hing to. Minneapolis \Vtirburg. 0.. and \\. Christian. 1942. Isolicrung tintl Kristiillistition des (.iiirungs‘ I‘crmcnts linolase Biochem. 2. 310:334 421. 1.. Barnes. 1963. Studies on the cell wall ol' (llr()NI()/)U('lt'rlllltl i'i'u/utt'imi: the separation oI lipopolysacchtiride .ind iiiucopeptide by phenol cs— traction of whole cells. .I. Biol. (hem. 238236 29. W.. and S. (i. Knight. 1952. l-xperiments in bacterial physiology. Burgess Publishing Co., Minneapolis. Neumunn. and .\I. D. Socolotsky I961. Develop- ment and germination of the .‘Izoioharter cyst. .1. Bli)Dh_\\. Biochem. (y'lnl. 102.555 50.5. . Zaitseva. (i, N., l. A. Ishmcl. and A. N, Belozerskii. I961. Biochemi- cal changes in synchronous cultures ol Imio/iircter vinelandii. Dokl. Akad. N;IU1(.S.S.R. 1412740 743. leovnple‘ .uv—u :n- r-i- .»..— ”... ,# F .a. W. ., «can. . . i... .zL‘ ......— a.... .. ... 5?“... ......nW 1.1 3. wagfit ..A .. «£1» 11553 fists.) .... .\ .5 ...s .15.» \. . Haksfilswug ..tkstiosixrtv. s. .r... s: htxwms. Ems ,. squnhvhkllfi- . . \. 5‘ IVWN‘UI now-k .... 3.“... “mm. 1342...»... “awake ..sasssschssssss 13.1.... .scsscwoeswsav...» . .utts .‘r. s“! 23%“ 1s . szmmwxavw . v. . a . .... .s»....n..\.w....... . . a... . ...“... . .24 3.... Q a .. ask...» .