é WWWIW1HUIMHMHWWllthllMlllHl 715 itfif‘ad LIBRARY K Michigan State ’ University This is to certify that the thesis entitled A SURVEY OF PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGICAL INSTRUMENTATION AND OF ITS APPLICATIONS IN EDUCATION, EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY AND COMMUNICATION presented by Richard Burtschi i has been accepted towards fulfillment } of the requirements for Doctorate degree in Philosophy 5%,. £4. 7 Out”. MLJW M or fessor Date April 18, 1977 0-7639 © 1978 RICHARD JUL I US BURTSCHI ALL RI GHTS RESERVED A SURVEY OF PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGICAL INSTRUMENTATION AND OF ITS APPLICATIONS IN EDUCATION, EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY AND COMMUNICATION By Richard Burtschi A DISSERTATION Submitted to Michigan State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Department of Secondary Education and Curriculum l977 x? “If”? (VJ/{Q ABSTRACT A SURVEY OF PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGICAL INSTRUMENTATION AND OF ITS APPLICATIONS IN EDUCATION, EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY AND COMMUNICATION By Richard Burtschi This study addresses the question of the diffusion of existing innovative, electronic and non-electronic instrumentation in areas where The study develops, first, a Then it it is under-used or not used at all. picture of the types of instrumentation that are available. focuses upon useage being made of five specific types of physiological Applications are then suggested for those five types Finally, the instrumentation. in areas where they are under-used or not used at all. results of the study are summarized and discussion is included of an organizational structure which might help bridge the gap between teachers The goal of or researchers and the technology discussed in the study. the study is, therefore, to attempt to identify and then recommend to teachers and researchers tools to which they may, previously, have had no introduction or access, and to propose means through which they might get that introduction and access. To accomplish the above goal seven objectives were planned and accomplished for the study. A taxonomy of available electronic and non-electronic instru- 1) mentation was developed. A taxonomy of instrumentation applications and research problems 2) which are addressed by the above instrumentation was developed. Richard Burtschi 3) A multi-disciplinary literature survey was done to determine who, in general, uses the types of instrumentation shown in the instrumentation taxonomy, and to determine how the instru- mentation is used. This survey focused upon the first five categories of the instrumentation taxonomy, i.e. five forms of physiological instrumentation: brain waves (theta, alpha, and beta), muscle voltage measurement (EMG), skin conductance measurement (GSR), biofeedback and telemetry. 4) A narrower literature survey was done to determine within the fields of education, educational psychology and communication what uses are being made of the above five types of instrumentation. 5) A Coding Matrix was developed: a) to help categorize types of instrumented research, b) to identify and display areas for which the surveys did not find citations (suggesting, in some cases, what may be new areas of instrumentation application), c) to code the bibliography to facilitate location of citations dealing with a specified type of instrumentation application. 6) Interviews were held with researchers in education, communication and educational psychology to see if additional instrumentation applications could be added to those identified in the surveys conducted for objectives three and four. 7) An 'instrumentation resource center' structure was described and discussed. This structure could mediate technology to 'non-technical' persons. Conclusions. The first conclusion is that there are, indeed, useful applications in the social sciences of the five types of instrumentation focused upon by this study. A variety of applications were identified for Richard Burtschi the fields of education, educational psychology and communication. It appears that a number of those applications have, to date, hardly been explored. A second conclusion arises from interviews held with a variety of researchers and department heads at Michigan State University while this study was being done. These persons are aware of the potential usefulness of instrumentation in their areas and, without exception, expressed the desire to gain access to it. The conclusion arising from this is that it would be desireable to provide such persons access to instrumentation. Interest was expressed by persons in education, communication, physical education and recreation, music, osteopathic and human medicine, athletics (e.g. track and tennis), dietetics and speech and hearing. A number of teachers, e.g. of relaxation classes, communication, business and psychology classes indicated interest. Interest was expressed by clinical psychologists in private practice and connected with a pain clinic at a medical center. The diversity of persons expressing interest parallels the findings of the study as to where the most useful applications are being made, or are beginning to be made. Recommendations. First, it is recommended that surveys such as those done for this study be done for other areas of the social sciences to identify instrumentation applications in those areas. Second, it is recommended that the taxonomies of instrumentation and research problems be further developed. Improvement of those taxonomies would make possible, for example, construction of a more thorough matrix for a field such as communication or education, identifying existing research and displaying areas where new activity might be initiated. Third, it is recommended that steps be taken to implement some form of 'instrumentation resource center' Richard Burtschi activity to mediate technology to teachers and researchers who wish to undertake use of new technology but who need assistance in acquiring and using it. It is believed, based on the results of this study, that the areas of social science surveyed comprise a ready and fertile ground for efforts to diffuse innovations in instrumentation. DEDICATION This thesis is dedicated to my parents ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The writer wishes to express his appreciation to the many persons who have helped in the various stages of development of this study. Particular thanks are expressed to Dr. Allan Abedor for his excellent counsel while chairman of the guidance committee and during earlier phases of the doctoral program. Thanks are expressed to the other members of the guidance committee for their unique insights and their generous assistance. Drs. Abedor, Norman Bell, Richard Farace and James Nord each brought unique and invaluable perspectives on the subject of technological innnovation. Special thanks go to Dr. Lawrence Alexander, Director of the Learning and Evaluation Service, for providing assistance in defining the role which an instrumentation resource center can play at a university such as Michigan State, and for providing a work environment within which the first resource center type services were attempted by the writer. Using the experience and insights gained while working with Dr. Alexander an attempt will be made to initiate an instrumentation resource center on a broad scale. Thanks go to Dr. Stephen Yelon for his helpful insights, and to Dr. Stephen Sachs for his advice on thesis writing. The writer expresses gratitude to the Jesuit Order for financial support for this doctoral program. This thesis was assembled and typed by Mrs. Pat Sweet. A more competent person technically, or one more gifted in good humor and interpersonal skills, would be difficult, indeed, to find. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES ........................... APPENDIX .............................. Chapter I. BACKGROUND ......................... Need for the Study ..................... Generalizability ...................... Objectives and Methodology ................. Limitations of the Study .................. Definition of Terms .................... Overview of Chapters to Follow ............... II. AN OVERVIEW OF AVAILABLE INSTRUMENTS AND TECHNIQUES . III. Comments on Taxonomies in General ............. Development of a Research Instrumentation Taxonomy ..... Development of a Research Problem Taxonomy ......... THE MULTI-DISCIPLINARY SURVEY OF LITERATURE ........ Results of The Survey ................... Instrumentation and Biofeedback in Education and Educational Psychology .................. Instrumentation and Physical Education ........... Instrumentation and Counseling ............... Instrumentation and Reading Education . . . ....... Instrumentation and Research in Intelligence ........ Instrumentation and the Hyperkinetic Child ......... Instrumentation and Instructional Technology ........ Instrumentation and Medicine, Psychiatry and Psychology ........................ Biofeedback Applications Other Than Those Of Interest To This Study ...................... Applications of Telemetry Instrumentation ......... A Listing of Instrumentation Applications Identified In This Review of Literature ............... Summary of the Multi-Disciplinary Review of Literature. . . vi Page 1 flog->00 10 14 l7 l7 I9 25 3O 31 Chapter Page IV. LITERATURE REVIEW FOR THREE SELECTED DISCIPLINES ...... Sl Survey of Journals in Educational Psychology ........ 5l Survey of Journals in Education .............. 60 Survey of Journals in Communication ............ 66 Summary of the Surveys ................... 68 Listing of Research Applications Identified in the Surveys ....................... 70 A Coding Chart for Classification of Types of Instrumented Research .................. 74 An Application of the Coding Chart ............. 77 Arranging of Interviews and a Formal Discussion Group With Three Researchers .................. 80 Summary of the Results of the Surveys of Chapters Three and Four ...................... 84 v. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS 85 Development of an Instrumentation Resource Center Structure ........................ 85 Summary of the Results of the Study ............ 88 Conclusions and Recommendations .............. 90 APPENDIX. . ............................ 93 BIBLIOGRAPHY ............................ 95 iv LIST OF TABLES Table Page l TAXONOMY OF INSTRUMENTATION ................... 22 2 A RESEARCH PROBLEM TAXONOMY JUXTAPOSED WITH THE INSTRUMENTATION TAXONOMY .......................... 27 3 APPLICATION OF THE RESEARCH FACTOR TAXONOMY TO A RESEARCH PROBLEM .......................... 28 4 INSTRUMENTATION APPLICATIONS IDENTIFIED IN CHAPTER 3 ...... 45 5 INSTRUMENTATION APPLICATIONS IDENTIFIED IN CHAPTER 4 ...... 7l 6 CODING CHART FOR CLASSIFICATION OF INSTRUMENTED RESEARCH . . . . 75 APPENDIX Appendix Page A SOURCES OF DATA FOR THIS STUDY ............... 93 vi Chapter I BACKGROUND Within the last two decades a technological revolution has occurred which has touched virtually every area of our lives. There have been substantial improvements, as well as entirely new developments, in measurement instrumentation and the research procedures used with it. Norton (1969) writes: The rapid growth of the instrumentation field during the past decade has few parallels in history. The sophisticated electronic measurement systems now in routine operation in many countries would have appeared of marginal credibility as recently as the mid-1950's. These developments have supplemented or transformed research activities in some areas of study, but not all. Some of the researchers who might have applications for such instrumentation, e.g. in the fields of education, communications, etc., are still experiencing the frustration of the technological communication barrier which must be crossed before they can reliably use such instrumentation. In this connection Wolff (1970) emphasizes the need for researchers to be aware of instrumentation: Most...people will simply not pose problems unless they are at least marginally aware of the technology which might be capable of producing a solution. What is needed, therefore, is someone who can say: "This or that new engineering technique is now available: My preliminary thinking and experimentation suggest that it ought to be useful to solve this or that...problem." Beyond the fact that people need to know of instrumentation before being able to raise certain types of questions, there is another important fact related to its use. In some research situations, as in psychophysiological measurements, instruments can detect, record and process data in ways that the unaided human researcher cannot. For example, the human observer tends to forget and to distort data: So much of our raw data consists of brief impressions of evanescent, fleeting moments of behavior. They are here and gone in a flash, never to recur, never to be re-enacted or re-lived in exactly the same way.... It is this fleeting moment which must be studied. For this purpose it would have to be perceived, recorded and recalled with precision. Yet, we know that during the whole experience the observer himself is emotionally involved ..... Yet, when we are involved emotionally, we are hardly free to make precise, objective, obser— vations, to record them accurately, or to recall them without bias ..... Parents and teachers and psychiatrists have all been dependent for their basic data upon their imperfect and fallible memories of visual and auditory perceptions which are themselves subject to distortion (Kubie, l964). Lawrence (l967) writes of the need for this type of study from the perspective of one in the Audio Visual field: Unfortunately, as it stands, the increased AV-type research activities supported in the past several years both by major educational foundations and by the Federal Government, especially under the provisions of Title VII of the National Defense Education Act, include no elaborate studies on the instrumentation philosophy and application of the bio-physical type systems to audiovisual use. Instead, due to a lack of something better, responsible personnel continue to wring out the semi-fixed possibilities of antiquated machines and Gestalt-type psychological concepts. Need For The Study It is important that researchers in the social sciences know Of new, or improved, instrumentation. The primary reason for this is that new, or improved, instrumentation should yield new, or more refined, data. This, in turn, should enable researchers to get better answers to their research questions and, perhaps, to ask some new or better questions. To provide researchers with an overview of available instrumen- tation it is necessary that they have access to some sort of inventory, or survey, Of instrumentation useage. Such a survey should indicate possible applications, the types of data which can be acquired, and give an indication of the types of interpretation which can be placed upon that data. This survey should give researchers a better perspective as to what expectations might be placed upon such equipment. They Should know both the strengths and limitations of their instrumentation. Finally, that survey can serve as a point of departure for efforts to identify research areas in which instrumentation, of the types reviewed, is used very little, or not at all. Another critical need is to communicate to developers of instrumentation technology some of the unique needs Of various areas of research, such as education, educational psychology and conmunications. Finally, it is important that innovative research instrumentation be made available to researchers who might benefit from it. With a given instrument a researcher in communications or education is likely to generate different questions from what an experimental psychologist would generate. A study is needed, therefore, to promote the broader use of available technology, i.e., the diffusion of innovations in instrumentation. Rogers (1971) states: An innovation (italics) is an idea, practice, or object perceived as new by an individual. It matters little, so far as human behavior is concerned, whether or not an idea is "objectively" new as measured by the lapse of time since its first use or discovery. It is the perceived or subjective newness of the idea for the individual that deter- mines his reaction to it. If the idea seems new to the individual, it is an innovation. A study is, thus, needed which addresses the question of diffusion of instrumentation innovations. The Generalizability_pf This Study A survey of research instrumentation in education, educational psychology, and communications will be of interest to a variety Of researchers outside those areas, whether in the social sciences, engineering, etc.. The research problems in any given area will dictate what forms of instrumentation are of value there. The Objectives and Methodology of This Study Seven objectives have been set for this study which are described in this section along with the methods employed to achieve them. In general, this study develops, first, a broad picture of the types of research instrumentation that are available (Chapter 2, Objectives l and 2). It then focuses upon useage being made of several types Of psychophysiological instrumentation (Chapter 3, Objective 3: Chapter 4, Objectives 4 and 5). Applications are then suggested for those psychophysiological tools in areas where they appear to be little used (Chapter 4, Objective 6). Finally, the results of the study will be summarized and some discussion included of an organizational structure which might bridge the gap between researchers and the technology discussed in the study (Chapter 5, Objective 7). The primary goal of the study is, therefore, to attempt to innovate through identifying and, then, recommending to researchers tools to which they may, previously, have had no introduction or access (Chapter 5, Objective 7, deals with means through which researchers might get that introduction or access). Objective 1. The first objective of this study was to develop a taxonomy of research instrumentation and techniques. This taxonomy provides a listing and categorization of available instrumentation and serves as a background for chapters to follow. The instrumentation ranges from non-physiological to physiological and, within each category, from simple to more complex. The procedure used to develop the taxonomy included the follow- ing: a) discussion of the rationale for an instrumentation taxonomy, b) searching through psychological, educational, medical, technical and other sources in an effort to locate instrumentation types, c) plan- ning and justifying of the arrangement and 'ordering' of instrumentation within the taxonomy. Objective 2. The second objective of this study was to develop a taxonomy of research problems which are addressed by the previously identified instrumentation. This taxonomy lists and categor- izes a wide variety Of research problems. For example, a variety of research problems can be identified under the heading of motor performance: fatigue, skill in manual performance, muscle tension, and hand-eye coordination. The research problem taxonomy will be used in juxtaposition with the instrumentation taxonomy to Show applications of instrumentation. The method used to develop the research factor taxonomy includes the following: a) discussion of the rationale for a research problem taxonomy, b) searching through psychological, educational, medical, technical and other sources in an effort to identify a variety of categories of research factors, c) arranging of the research problems according to the rationale developed. Objective 3. The third objective of this study is to determine who, in general, uses the types of advanced instrumentation to be described, how it is used, and with what results. The method used to get this data was a multi-disciplinary survey of literature, including both manual and computer searches. The sources manually searched and the seven computer searches initiated were: a) any considered likely to contain citations about use of instrumentation and, b) those related to social science areas to be focused upon in Chapter 4. To facilitate follow-up study, details of the computer searches are given in Appendix A. Other information sources were used also, e.g., Disserta- tion Abstracts and various indexes to periodical literature. The outcome sought from the above searches was citations describ- ing research using the types of instrumentation focused upon by this study. The questions asked of the citations for objective number 3 were: Who uses advanced instrumentation, how, and with what results? A citation will be considered to be ‘of value! to this study if it provides answers to one or all of those questions. Objective 4. The fourth objective of this study was to determine within three selected subject matter areas who uses advanced instrumenta- tion, how they use it, and with what result. The selected areas were education, communication and educational psychology. Education and communication were selected because they are areas in which little advanced instrumentation, if any, is being used, and because there are numerous potential applications there. Educational psychology was selected because it is an area in which some use of such instrumentation has been made but where there are further potential applications. The method used to collect the needed data was a selective literature review of five research oriented journals within each of the chosen areas. Selection of those journals was based upon the recommen- dations of Michigan State University faculty within each of the areas and upon the results of the computer and manual searches in identifying potential sources. The outcome sought from this intra-disciplinary survey was citations describing research using types of instrumentation focused upon by this study. This survey sought to determine: a) who, if anyone, within the areas searched has used advanced instrumentation, b) how they have used it and, c) what results they have reported. Objective 5. The fifth objective of this study was to develop a coding system, in a matrix format, which will aid in identification of instrumentation applications and in selection of appropriate instrumenta- tion for one's own research. Specific applications of the coding matrix in this study are: a) identification (coding) of types of instrumented research located in the computer and manual searches done for this study, b) identification and display of areas for which available research was ngt_found in the surveys (empty cells in the matrix will, therefore, suggest either that research has not been done in a particular category or that it simply was not found in the surveys done for this study), c) coding the bibliography of this study to aid in the location of information involving the use of a particular type of instrumentation with a specified type of research problem. The method used to develop the coding system matrix included the following steps: a) establishing a rationale for the coding system, b) selection of a matrix format, c) construction of the matrix. Objective 6. The sixth objective of this study was to identify research applications in the three subject matter areas surveyed. Having determined by reviewing journals what is being done in those areas, and using the results of the broader search done for Objective 3, interviews were held with one experienced researcher in each of the three areas. This was, in effect, a 'consultant-consultant' interview in which the knowledge of interviewer and interviewee were pooled. The researchers interviewed were familiarized with the types of instrumenta- tion being focused upon and with the results of the literature surveys conducted for purposes 3 and 4. After the above private interviews the three participated in a group discussion conducted with the intention of identifying new instrument applications. The data being sought from the interviews and the discussion, therefore, was the judgment of subject matter experts and of the inter- viewer concerning new instrument applications in the fields of communi- cation, education and educational psychology. Objective 7. The seventh objective of this study was to present the theoretical and functional structure of an 'instrumentation resource center', the purpose of which would be to provide the organizational structure needed to disseminate instrumentation and technical assistance to researchers. As in the preceding objectives, the method used was to develop a rationale then to discuss an organizational structure. Based upon that structure it will be possible to draft a proposal for the testing of that structure at a major university. The drafting of the proposal itself is not, however, a part of this study. Limitations Of This Study This study does not deal with all electronic instrumentation, or non-electronic instrumentation, that is available. It focuses upon a few types which appear, on the basis of relative inexpensiveness and ready availability, to be transferable to use by social scientists and other 'non-laboratory' type researchers. It is not suggested that those types of instrumentation will be applicable to, or will improve the quality of data gotten in, all types of research or measurement. The instruments to be focused upon by this study are: l) alpha wave and theta wave monitoring instruments, 2) skin conductance monitoring instruments (galvanic skin response), 3) muscle voltage monitoring instruments (electromyographic measurement), 4) physiological feedback techniques (provision of feedback to the person from whom measures are being taken), 5) physiological telemetry techniques. This study will not deal with legal considerations important in instrumentation use. There are, for example, laws relative to researchers and personswho serve as research subjects. These are concerned with the types of research done, the procedures used, the competency of the researcher. Also, laws are being drafted concerning the types of instruments that will be considered safe for human research. For example, TO the United States Congress is currently preparing for passage of the Medical Device Amendments of 1976 (see Federal Register, Vol. 14, NO. 173, Friday, September 3, l976) which is concerned with the safety'of devices and with the determination of the real therapeutic value of devices to be used for medical purposes. Definition of Terms Because some readers of this study will be unfamiliar with some of the terminology of the study this section will include elaborated definitions. Several definitions are accompanied by references to the taxonomy of instrumentation in Chapter 2. Reference to that taxonomy will facilitate understanding of the definitions given. Bioelectricgpotentials. These are voltages generated by electrochemical activity in certain types of cells in the body. Such identifiable voltages are produced by systems in the body as they carry out their functions. They provide a good deal of information on various aspects of system function. For example, bioelectric potentials are f0und in connection with such activities as heartbeat, brain activity, muscle activity and nerve conduction. Alpha waves. Electroencephalography is the term used to describe the process of detecting voltages on the surface of the head. Alpha waves are one type of bioelectric voltage measured there which will be discussed in this study. Alpha waves appear as a series of waves occur— ring at the rate of approximately 8 to l2 waves per second. The frequency ranges of voltages appearing on the head have been arbitrarily assigned Greek letter names (Delta, voltages below 4 waves per second; Theta, voltages at 4 to 8 waves per second; Alpha, voltages at 8 to 13 waves per second; Beta, voltages above 13 waves per second). The functions ll within the brain producing these waves are not fully understood. How- ever, they appear to be related to responses to sensory stimuli, visual activity, relaxation, anxiety, attention and fatigue. Subjects seem to be able to exercise a remarkable degree of voluntary (indirect) control over the rate and amplitude at which these waves are produced and, cons- equently, over the factors listed above. Electromyography. This is the technique by which bioelectric voltages developed within muscles are measured. These voltages are proportional to muscle activity or tension. They can be measured at the surface of the skin above the muscles of interest or through use of needles which penetrate the skin. Research has shown that subjects can exercise voluntary, but indirect, control over the level of activity in some muscles. They can, for example, condition themselves to 'relax' muscles and, thus, perform motor functions more efficiently. Feedback and classical conditioning. These two terms are listed together not because they mean the same thing but, rather, because they have a common function. The autonomic nervous system cannot be directly and voluntarily controlled but conditioning and feedback are two techniques through which that system can be influenced indirectly. In Pavlovian conditioning a stimulus which, initially, is neutral, such as a sound, can be caused to get the same response from an animal as a natural stimulus, such as the sight of food, if the neutral stimulus is presented to the animal several times just prior to the natural stimulus. This is Pavlovian 'classical' conditioning. Biological feedback is another means of indirectly influencing the autonomic nervous system. If an autonomically controlled activity is monitored by an instrument and a subject sees, hears or feels immediately 12 when a change in that function has occurred then the individual can, in some cases, learn to influence the function. For example, if a subject hears the sound of the heartbeat research indicates that some, but not all, persons can learn to influence the rate of the beat upward or downward. Such influence has been claimed over skin tempera- ture, alpha waves (and other brain waves), heart rate, skin conductance, muscle activity, blood flow in certain parts of the body, insulin production, urine production and stomach acidity. Galvanic skin response (GSR). This is the measurement of electrical resistance of the skin and tissue path between two points on the surface of the skin. The resistance might vary from lOOO to greater than 500,000 ohms. These variations are influenced by the activity of the autonomic nervous system. Changes in emotional state, various reactions, such as fear or anger, cause measurable changes. These changes can be made observable as meter needle movements, changes in pitch of a sound, changes in lights, or in recordings on a chart recorder. This instrument is one used in 'lie detector' systems. Use of feedback of skin conductance is made to enable subjects to indirectly control the conductance. In controlling conductance one exercises indirect control over states that cause the changes. For example, some subjects can learn to reduce the amount of conduction change occurring when confronted with various types of stressful stimuli. In other words, the person is learning to 'relax', to show less of this particular response to those stimuli. 13 Instrumentation. This term describes 'tools' used in the acquisition of research data. In this study the term includes research techniques, software and hardware. For example: l. Non-hardware data gathering tools: e.g. questionnaires, self- report formats, discussion formats, simulation and games, designed for the purpose of generating research data. In the taxonomy of instrumentation, Chapter 2, see categories 17 and 18. 2. Procedures, software and hardware used for observation (monitoring) of characteristics of research subjects through visual, aural, tactile, and other means, using instruments to aid in observation and/or storing, processing and displaying of data (e.g., cameras, audio telemetry, recorders, computers, etc.). These types of instrumentation are shown in the taxonomy of instrumentation, Chapter 2, categories 9 to 16 and 19 to 21. 3. Physiological measuring and monitoring instruments which measure, record, process and/or display data relative to physiological and emotional activities of research subjects. See the taxonomy of instrumentation categories 1 to 8. As stated earlier, this study will focus its attention on categories 1 to 5. In the course of this study the terms 'advanced instrumentation' are used frequently to describe the physiological instruments in categories 1 to 5. The word 'advanced' implies that they require special background information and a knowledge of techniques which most researchers, social scientists, etc., will not initially have. This 14 study discusses, in Chapter 5, ways in which that information can be gotten by them. Psychophysiolggical measurements. Some cognitive or affective activities are reflected in measurable physical effects, e.g., a change in a voltage or some other change at some location in the body. A psychophysiological measurement is one made of that physical effect with the purpose of interpreting the effect in terms of the mental activity. Researcher. This term is used to describe the target audience of this study. It is meant to include researchers in the fields of education, communication, educational psychology, music and physical education, or any other area which can benefit from instrumentation use. Telemetry. This word means 'to measure at a distance.’ Any sound, pressure, acceleration, temperature or physiological measure can be transmitted to a distant monitoring point, whether inches or miles away. The transmission can be by radio wave, wires, light, sound or infra-red. When the measurement is of a physiological or biological activity the term used to describe it is 'biotelemetry.' One of the principal advantages of telemetry is that it can free subjects from wires and lab restraints so that research is less obtrusive upon the natural activity and behavior of the subject. Overview Of The Chapters To Follow Since the first intention of this study is to develop a picture of types of research instrumentation and techniques that are available Chapter 2 will take the first steps in that direction. It will contain taxonomies of research problems, and of instrumentation and techniques. 15 Chapters 3 and 4 of this study will present the findings of two literature surveys. The first survey was a broad one intended to locate as many sources of information as possible on the types of instrumentation of interest to this study. It was desired to learn what types of research have been done and what findings have emerged. The second survey asks the same questions only with attention focused on three selected areas of study where it is suspected little use has been made of the instrumentation. Both of the surveys will seek to find either what has been done or what is being done in the areas searched. Using the information found above as a point of departure, Chapter 4 will,also, seek to identify new research applications for instrumentation. Personal interviews with subject matter experts in three disciplines were arranged to assist in that process. Based on the research of Chapters 3 and 4, and on information gained in the interviews, charts were developed showing applications of instrumentation to research problems in the areas searched. Also, a coding system was developed to identify the types of application contained in the sources listed in the bibliography, to provide a convenient classification system for instrumented research (in this study and elsewhere), and to identify areas where the surveys indicate new applications of instrumentation might be made. The final chapter will, first, describe an 'instrumentation resource center' type activity which could provide researchers and teachers in educational institutions with access to information and instrumentation appropriate to their needs. This activity would serve 16 to bridge the information gap which exists between many researchers and the area of instrumentation technology. The final chapter will, then, review the outcomes of the study, and present conclusions and suggestions for further research. Chapter II AN OVERVIEW OF AVAILABLE INSTRUMENTS AND TECHNIQUES The purpose of this chapter is to develop two taxonomies, one of research instrumentation and one of research problems. The taxonomies contain instrumentation and research problems relevant to the fields of education, educational psychology, communication and other areas. The instrumentation taxonomy contains a continuum of instruments ranging from physiological (where measures are taken directly from the subject) to non-physiological (where measure are taken indirectly, e.g. by observation of the subject at a distance). This study will focus upon several of the physiological measures. Comments on Taxonomy Development Since this study presents two taxonomic structures to help achieve its objectives it is important that some problems related to the nature, strengths, and limitations of such structures be briefly addressed. During the literature searches a variety of articles and books were encountered in which 'taxonomies' of one sort or other were presented. Among those found there was some_agreement on the definition of what a taxonomy is. Some sources first define the word according to its earliest etymology, its origin in the Greek words taxis (arrangement or classification) and nomos (law). Others do not stop to define the word but merely proceed to develop their structure in terms of what is needed fOr a particular application. In sum, though, the definition implied in the word 'taxonomy‘ is that of a science of classification according 17 18 to certain laws and principles. In practice the rigidity of the word laws is sometimes softened to allow the term 'taxonomy' to be applied to 'convenient and useful schemata' which may contain some useful though occasionally'arbitrary classifications. There is some potential for misunderstanding in the building and use of taxonomies if one applies the meaning of 'taxonomy' used in certain of the natural sciences inappropriately in the social sciences. In biology and botany, for example, 'natural' hierarchies are recorded, e.g. kingdoms, phyla, superclasses, infraclasses, etc.. Those sciences have developed very detailed classification codes for themselves, e.g. The International Code Of Nomenclature For Cultivated Plants. Taxonomies encountered during this study in social sciences were based upon some observed natural divisions, some constructural content, and some categorizations which appeared to be prompted by the particular intentions of the author and by needs in the field of the author in organizing and displaying the information. An example of a taxonomy developed for use in the social sciences is the Taxonomy Of Educational Objectives in the affective domain (Krathwohl, Bloom and Masia, 1973). The authors state: We should note that any classification scheme represents an attempt to abstract and order phenomena and as such probably does some violence to the phenomena as commonly observed in natural settings. The value of these attempts to abstract and classify is in their greater power for organizing and controlling the phenomena.... It was evident in our work that, although one could place an objective very readily in one of the three major domains or classes, no objective in one class was entirely devoid of some components of the other two classes. The domains evidently represent emphases and perhaps even biases in the statement of objectives. 19 It is important, therefore, that it be understood that taxonomies, such as those prepared for this study, represent a convenient way of organizing and displaying information. But the arrangement of instru- mentation and research factors derives partly from norms arising from the nature of the information and partly from the needs of this study. Therefore, norms such as the principles of 'exclusiveness' or of 'natural hierarchy' cannot be used as the principal tests of the instrumentation and research factor taxonomies. The taxonomies have been developed for the purposes and requirements of this study and remain open to further development according to the needs of other researchers. Development Of A Taxonomy Of Instrumentation The taxonomy of instrumentation has been developed to provide an operational description of types of research instrumentation relevant to the needs of education, educational psychology, communication, and other fields, that are available. It lists and categorizes instruments ranging from simple and non-physiological (e.g. use of the technique of 'oral questioning' to get data) to more complex and physiological (e.g. use of skin conductance to measure affective responses). The basic rationale for this taxonomy, the reasoning offered to justify its development, is based upon its usefulness in describing available instrumentation and upon its usefulness to researchers who wish to apply those tools in their work. In the words of Krathwohl, Bloom and Masia (1973): "...The value of these attempts to abstract and classify is in their greater power for organizing and controlling the phenomena...." 20 A variety of sources were consulted to determine the entries included in the taxonomy. None was found which attempted, systematically, to include the array of tools listed here in any sort of continuum. Especially, none was found which included physiological instrumentation in a continuum with non-physiological types. Such effbrts may well exist in the literature but they were not located in the searches done for this study. Finally, a word needs to be said about the arrangement and 'order- ing' of instrumentation within the taxonomy. The listings fall into two main categories: instrumentation which is physiological (such as galvanic skin response), and those types which are non-physiological (such as various forms of standardized written eXamination). The arrangement of the taxonomy with the physiological measures at the higher end of the list is based upon the fact that data taken with physiological instrumentation is taken directly from the research subject and is to some extent 'objectively' quantifiable in electrical, mechanical, etc., terms. Also, the difference in 'distance' between the research subject and the measuring instrument used leads to important differences in the type of distortion likely to occur in the data acquired. For example, studies have been done of the subtle movement of facial muscles during human interaction. There is a difference in 'distance' from the subject between having an observer scrutinize a video-tape for various movements as contrasted with direct measurement of the voltages appearing in those muscles during the same interaction. Both types of measure have advantages and disadvantages. But the distortion in data due to the 21 limitations of the human observer are less easily definable than those introduced by a muscle voltage measuring instrument. The taxonomy lists and categorizes instruments as: a) physiological or non-physiological and, b) where possible, in order of technological complexity, or complexity in format or materials required. Some of the listings in the taxonomy were arbitrarily assigned a place when no order was apparent since the primary purpose of the taxonomy is to display the instrumentation and techniques in a format useful to this study. To assist in defining the types of data and types of process relevant to each form of instrumentation columns have been included in the taxonomy describing the input to and processed output from each instrumentation type. In summary, the instrumentation taxonomy displays a broad range of available instrumentation and relates those to be focused upon in this study, categories 1 to 5, to others that are available. Further use of the taxonomy will be made later in the study. 22 no.» uoopo pocmza_con ocmoaumc c. «moguw co maquco e>Louno cu A>u_mcmuc. :. woocozo mc.>cwmno new :maoczu «sow. ocvmwma xnv awucwoc.e o co mmwcxcmv Lo mmocugov_ m>+uepot on“ »c Louangucuochmu a co_—oo m. wu,>~v use avagmocwc ago sec; myoc “Lam; ucoomc cu com: m. vozums mwza cog: .oao .acoso>oe Leume .umozu co mocmcuce:oc.u .o.wv mwomu_o> cco mucocgao cu ..uuu .eocwgmc23ocwu .wE:_o> «cosmczmuws um, co.uuu.paao peu.a»u a we vm>n_ampc ecu mmocogu os:_o> c. mwocogu uro>cou mgmuacmcocu camcoomezgopn xgaocooemacuo_a .o Avocoocvc. .vc20m .a>o3 o*uoL .ugo._ .o.~v vow: on o» Ea.ume mace any so; mwmmwooLa L~uu.£mccgu v.5,uao en La goa.a c. moacago 36.x) wooeu_o> Lo mucwccau 09 cc to .m:.v~wg Logos pouvovv ..uuo .m.c.ucwuoa u.cuue.wo_a Lo mo—oco ca .m.o .Egow touvmmc .wcovuocopouoc .mosauucwgama Lm>*wumg cu pocu_m mucm>cou Lm>.oooc .mvcammmgn aco>cou mcwuacmcacu \e:.uws\cmuu.emcuca agaoEu—ouo.m .m A.uua .vcaom cu uoaapwcucu one mpmrucouonopnv aoomoaw ou cov.>ocn m_ oceancumc, .oo.mxgno.o use co Au>OAo Aucezo m_zu «sauna use cu .oco.ucoaocn ..ouo v cu _ .u.mv unweacumc— to. nono_o>ov macwuv .co*uo.=5.um op_uunu .uso.— .v:30m —ao.m>;nova a to uaauao scoopmcogu —o.u:muono—o xuaavmouo.o .v .uao .ocou o so sou—a ecu cw mwocozo .mo:.uooc Looms mo Locus ozu ca vamp vacumm c an use wee ecu ue_cw_ase ego gowzx umccauwc cecu muoccau c.xm Aacum£.uu:ocou «cuccao egg :* mwocogu convocn oac_ common Leave co vow. Acouos.uo=v=ou .spcouv acusoczmom: oucouoaucou cvxw :. mwoccgo _ eat» unocczo —_cem ago> .cscwvv Loewe «mo mmcoamou c.3m u.ce>—~u .n vooavoca on has mpuco_m cecEEOO “zu,>.uoe m_um:E so.) acc> ;o_;3 axe—gmwv pcam,>\_e*v=m convoca cu vow: Lo uwccoowc use meuoLuuo_w mwomupo> o_om:e Lo weau._ae~ Lm_:om:EoLuc_ Lo cometam »0 cu Paco.ucoaoca momma—o> o: voaova mcoc«_o> o_om:£ gaogaoxeocuuo_c xznocmo>5ocuuopu .N m_oco_m cesaeoo m=o_cm> convoca o» vow: up .— Luggage ea co_uomm xme mocou_o> ”xu.>.uoo o>m3 meowu—c—umu as» c. guano. an ever: :u_3 >Lm> :o.:x axe—am.v con_cuwwv one xmgp .xcaum m.:u an pu:m_>\_a_c=~ wuavoca mm>oz news“ can egg—o .o.o con: nomaooc on o» mucwescumc. ecu cu new: Lc vmvccomg wLo ”monouoe_w maoocauaooam Lo mwza.c;umu ecu cu.) _eoo «Lego mwcaupo> c.cca co oc=H.—oso ooecgsm xn a: vexumn wuocgam m.gu co m goacogu _ mm.coowumu cu .cce.ucouoca mwoeu_o> one: no mucoupc> uvcuoopoova smegma—oznoucoccuom_o Acaocao_ognmocoocuoopu .— uaauac on» we mom: vc< mcovaeuccacouc_ uaauao vwmmmooga 93a:— co_uoucmeacumc_ 0:9.cguo» xm_aw,o uc< ocvmmmooca .oc.cwnuoo mama Lou co_ueucoe:Law:_ co >Eocoxo» < _ u4m
wmcmuxm
comp w>uc cw:o_czumu omwcu
co.uuecobc.
we couu_ume u mu om: mu.
.A»u__u=c accom co mcaau_a
cu .m.mv c.6mu. e:_ume
ecu cu wmcoamwc co xccum
meta—cc. >p cu.z zucuommc
co_uu:cumc' co ocpmucue ccu
oc.__ocuc0o .occccoooc
.mc.mmmuoca .>u_nm¢u c.
pauom: ocu moaa.ccouu ommcu
mo—aumcu> _uuc~Ecoc*>ce co
—uu—mo_o_mxca cucu cocuuc
gommam uwsmcucu cu on
o» mcuwaau cocums mpg» saw:
cucummvs moco.ow .uuo0m ewes
co_uu=cumc. umccucmoca c_
cum: mu .m.w .u6uc_ca .uccw>
xuucuwuu do mace. xcue
ou muuupmc acomouuu wvcu
oc_vcoumc
co.uuwc*c muum “A_um:ocu
.uovoo_owmxca co pu>o_
.ucocmo mc.uuo.cc_. ouuc
xcupa ”ecu cocuuucw53cumc_
cu_.s.m oc_m: mwcamuwe
oxw cocuo exp .co.ucmuuu
ccu ummcmuc. cu .__:E.um
o_cuc=mum_n cu omcoqwuc
cu mmuu_uc wcamuue m_cu
.ouw .cmuco=u_ co couuwvuca
u mu m_oc my. cu .co.u
-_ccou .uo.mxcg .co.ucmuuu cu
cowuuc.nmoc mmuu_mc cucummmc
._um:ocu .uo_ao_o_mxca ccu
.uuvoc_ocuxmn cu cwuu—ec m.
mco_uuoo_ anon mao.cu> cu
ocauucoasmu co “cosmccmumc
ccc-ucbcm .mgmzz ecu Joe—o .cc_cu
.a.m .cew: e—_c ac ccc_EL¢uct m.
ccu uecwcam co cave—ucu cccccca
co vouummccg co wum_ucco accccc
w_nu_cu> m. xu_awwc co
cuuc ecu mechccocu omcau cw mu
“ccmcuELOLc, .ouw .u_couco0uocg
.uwgcuco .ucwca do xu_amwu
owcv> co umvmccu cuu unacao
mEQmem
_uccmuxm c, mm: co. mucsccco
.ccucoo .mucouucc o_ccuco
ucu acute ova—oc* cuo “cacao
ocuuucc Loewe ao_ucu
cu Lo ucaom .m.m .Eco. vccwmou
cu .ucomm muc¢>ccu cw>.cc¢c
“mace; ouuchocoou
ecu cw xouctocu mm__ga:m ecu
cm>_wooc mwco mommuooca ..oum
.cmuaaEco .wcmcucummoc .LOuoacumc_
vmucommca m:—:E_um
Lo max“ use cu cauu_ac mu ¢e_u
cm>o wacuco co cccocc be waccu
c, m. voucugu ho co.uuuwcagcucw
co_uuc_amwc do mE:_o> ucu muuc
vcoooc Lo\ccu »u_amct Amcco_ucu
Lo _cumuwcv vccvuuoc Locos
mocuzu yo «:205u
ecu cu _uco_uccaocn monoc_ucu
_uoucuoe_m cc .uo_cucoce c“
noucm>coc ecu mmmcuco mcauucacEEu
unauso oz» cc
mom: cc< covuuuwcagmuc_
azauno uwvmmuch
mmu>oe
.233? .33 E: B E8 9:
c_ .o.o .cmccoocc ecu menus, .oum mmaawccuou
cacao ucu .uwccuco .uccca .mcouomaocn .ucwEuo o_;nucoouoca .u.
cancoocc .cmmmmooca mucmcooEoo
on op .m_u:¢_> .o.m .uuuu Emumxm occ_> moccvccouu >h .mp
nmucoowc .uwmmmooLn mcuxucom vcu ocuzncuc mmacmccowu
en cu .ccua xcu co uuuc umuuvoowmu ccu cousc5oo coaageou .m—
ch_3 Lo ovum; .o.mv
sauces cmmocu ecu cozoccu
vouu_smcucu ecu commwoocn
ecu uuuc .uowmo_o_mxcn cm>wmomc A_ucmcmmv
-coc cacao ecu mmcoc .comcav \anvme\cmuu_emcucu xcquo—o» .pp
mauFLaocoau «oucvwmu Lou quLOc
m_ xouccmwc Hug: cu «so we“ .uco co ucwcn .m.m A_ucocwov
mu mw>ccm acowczm co cow>uc¢o muuycaccanu mu vcuom_mm xouacwou .o.
voucmmwca mcu
,_:e_um m=o_cu> mu umuLOUEL
ecu caum5u_c pccca c, «mocuco .ouw .mauuomu_> .s__u xcwumso—_mnac .o
exuuc_ c_u co we:_o>
ccu muuc cu ccuu_mc mcacuco
_uowm>cn mucoumc cwoacmcucu caucaoaamca acaucoossmca .m
mmocucu
mcauucmaEwu cu mucoamoc
.maxu xcaocwEImmu_o Lo a_cum
.uuoe c>mawmcmm mcauucccEcu A—uu_ao_o_mxcav
.LOHVEEcucu u .o.cv cowcam u LmEBEoEcwcu xcumsoEme» .s
“acc— co_uuucce:cuwc_ o:c_ccuo»
...co=c_ccou
_ ugmqp
---------------- NOIIVINJWOUISNI lVOlOOlOISAHd-NON ----------------------
'NOUISNI""
’TOISAHO
.euco_nxu
mmu— coon o>uc .uuo .uxuac
-cucuo .meLoum cu cowcn co_>ucwn
—ue—cu puamaca co ..eun ac.
upoou. co .cocucuuuu co mucouuo
no“ ecu ocsmumcn oucuoeoLua
no 53 .328 .mcoEuBE
.uco.uuu:eo ecu co.uuu_caccou
cu_x copuooccou c. eoco_axo
coon o>uc moccmuus omega mo wEOm
Acooouuu
m_cu c. eun.cumoe mucosacumc_
co moaxu «cu ca xpaau
o>onu oeu: nucmscou oeuu ocu
mucuuuzcoS» .uc.n.u
.w.o .ucoe on cue eomnu_o oe.u
co ucqucamums go's: cu.)
Auucauuu ecu omuococ. x—uuoco
.co>uzoc .mucoeao_o>oe .uu.
-ao—occuuu ucwuoa .em: coesou
c? coon uco— mu; ucamuns mvcu
napauoc L_ocu co
away o>puuconoccouu moe_>oca
m.c~ .o o» _ moucoouuuu
c. omocu mu con» mucamuas
—uu.uo_o.m>ca cur: co.uu::flceo
c. .Lo>o3oc .eom: on cu caooa
o>uc xuc» .um: cesaou cu
93 .26.: 05 B:— .035
me_a_u cocuo ecu
3232.558 .coZuoaeo c.
weus oc_ma ocu mco_uuo.paa<
.mcuu» “coco; c. meocuue omega
co neon be on: c. eoccauuo
mu; ucoeao_o>oe «paucoevmcoo
.Eocu oc.ecuooc opau—_u>u up
cocuumwc o—uu.4 .ee.c.ucoe.
oc.uc co mmouoca use cu m.
m—oou omazu co pu.ucouoa cc»
ea..qqu ecu emcucuumwc
»_o>.mcwuxo cues o>uc a>onu
ecu m... .muaouccuou omega
wEou_cu> ago we ouuam ecu
uo «co_uuo_ec_ .uucowe Lo oo_ucu
muco>o puccouxo ouu.ucc_
cu eauucocmo an xus _uco_m
ecuEEou u ”eoxu—am_e ecu .uccouxo
c. moocuco Lo acaou eouu_:e=uuu
appuccouxo
on: cou evaoposoe an Au: puco.n
ecs:eou u ”annuao Leave 50 —u.e
oopucu cu.) uaauao .uu.cucoo¢
co .cca» Loans mo—ucu co
_uu.o.e cu «sauce u.c0cuuo_o
momcoamoc
couuwcx co acoucoe co ..o.o
.mco.uu>comco ecu uuue eoc.moe
moeauvuuu .ucoacou
punce> .mco.>ucwn co_uuu.c2=coo
co .o.o .mcovuu>comuo eoc.wwe
«Leuupmcucu ago.—
-o«-ec20m .m.o .xcuwaoc_u Locuo
w>_ce cu ewm: we cue co “useOcn
ecu emcvmoe ecu on mus “cacao
.ouw .wuuc c_ emmmocasoo Lo
ewecuaxo .xouc eoxu—a .eueccomc
.em.e+_96u on cue cowucFEOuc.
v_ou_cu> —mucch0c_>co
ouuvcaocauu ecu c, mcomuu.cu>
mucu>o .uccouxu co
moaoopucu .uo.cucous co
.uu_cuuu~o Lo “cesscuwc.
cu c. “caoo o>.uupae:o
u uuaeoca muco>o puccuuxo
«smumxm Accuu—__omo
Luzon mmucaom cath
.uuvcucuos co o'cocuuu.o
usccoe ecu c. mucuc.uwucua
xa emew>oLo uaac.
cacao ecu puncw> .coquLI
“2:8 05
c. mucuawupccun an eoec>oca
unac_ .Locuo ecu ._uoce>
mecaom soc ouucocom
Lo sec“ cuc. emu o_eau
mmoo0ca muvaucvo o’coLuco_o
ec30m «ca .0 came—ucu
.uo_cuoe—w cu cuc_ cocuuccc>
Lo ecaom uce>coo «couaemcucu
.uuw .Auweue:c w>cuu_mc
.ocammwca uwcazamcsuu
._o>w_ co_uucn_> .wcsu
-ucuaeeu .uco._ ._o>m—
ecaom so; wucwsscuwc.
h»_oo—o> .oocoe
.ucweoou_nmwe .o.o
.mucoE3Lomc_ oc.»u_a
-m.e Lo\ecu oc.c:muue
cocooe co weaa._csu
acaoeu "mcauuo cc.>ucoc
u ceuuo rec oc_uc=ou
Lou .o.o "u.cocu
-uu_o co .uu.cucu~£
.mucue=cumc_ oc.>upamce
Lo\ecu oc.ucaou aco>u
cuuuxaoum cc
Eco—u .o.o .mucoe
-acumc_ uc_xu.am.e
Lo\ecu oc.g=mum£
we,» u_coLuoo_u
so .uu.cucuus
«mucouc.
.Acaucoo_a .Au._u
-comcoa .mucwmc_—ouc_
.cowmcocoLaEOu
.ucmeo>o_cou ecu
“AcwuagEou so .o.ov
euuuceus co .u—.uuuu
.—uco .coua*sx cwcuuc:
.mso>c=m .wcowumuaa
.mopuom .aumou
.uum
.covmmaumwe aaoco
.meum .co.uu_=e.m
£953 33:35
.uau .mcvuflm
-ocucxw oweau .mcouu_
-mcucu acme—-Ou-ec30m
.uuo
.mco_u,—osu .mcoecouvc
woaa_ccuou acuEmcamuwe
.uucOEcoL_>cu
moaacccuou mc_uc=ou
.m.o moaa.ccuwu
covuuu.»_ucu=o
xcaucoococcu
mc_cucuuo
uuue co» «gusto»
ecu mwav_ccumu ..uuo
.eo~*ecuecuum .ucvca
mcvcocuua uuue co»
«auscoc ecu muac_ccoou
—ucomcoacouc_\_uncu>
mean—ccoou
.u:m*>-—u*e:¢ Locuo
m~=u_ccuou owea<
.pw
ow
.m—
.5—
.0—
uacuao use
uo mum: ecu co_uuumcacauc_
uaauao emwmuuoca
unac—
. . .OoacwHCOu
— u4m