THESIS LEE; Aggy hgifififig ‘. «193. ”F :5: :"~ .‘t. V ‘5’ Umvursg g3: muamnm n- '3 11m This is to certify that the thesis entitled THE PARTIAL PURIFICATION OF PARA-NITROPHENOL: UDP—GLUCURONYLTRANSFERASE FROM RABBIT SMALL INTESTIONAL MICROSOMES presented by Wanda W. Broderick has been accepted towards fulfillment of the requirements for MS. degree in Biochemistry MW Major prgessor Date August 13, I982 0-7 639 MSU LIBRARIES m V RETURNING MATERIALS: Place in book drop to remove this checkout from your record. FINES will be charged if book is returned after the date stamped below. THE PARTIAL PURIFICATION OF PARA-NITROPHENOL: UDP-GLUCURONYLTRANSFERASE FROM RABBIT SMALL INTESTINAL MICROSOMES By Wanda W. Broderick A THESIS Submitted to Michigan State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE Department of Biochemistry 1982 Q I A,“ 0117. ABSTRACT THE PARTIAL PURIFICATION OF PARAfNITROPHENOL: UDP-GLUCYRONYLTRANSFERASE FROM RABBIT SMALL INTESTINAL MICROSOMES. By Wanda Woodward Broderick The purification of rabbit small intestinal microsomal pfnitrophenol: UPD-glucuronyltransferase might resolve many questions about the enzyme including its substrate specificty and heterogeneity. A procedure for the partial purification of pfnitrophenol: UDP-glucuronyltransferase from rabbit small intestinal microsomes was established, involving the preparation of intestinal microsomes, the solubilization of pfnitrophenolz UDP-glucuronyltransferase from these microsomes, and the DEAE column chromatography of the solubilized enzyme. This procedure was part of a scheme to purify the enzyme to homogeneity. Microsomes were obtained from the whole small intestine, which had an average pfnitrophenol: UDP-glucuronyltransferase activity of 24 nmoles pfnitrophenol conjugated per minute per mg of protein, and which were stable for six months when stored at -20'C. The microsomal solubilization process using octylglucoside increased the apparent pfnitrophenol: UDP-glucuronyltransferase specific activity approximately two fold, with a 752 recovery of enzyme activity. DEAE chromatography of the solubilized protein resulted in a 10 fold increase in pfnitrophenolz UDP-glucuronyltransferase specific activity over that of the microsomes. ACKNOWLEDGMENT I would like to thank Dr. Steven Aust for his guidance and support. TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Tables . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . List of Figures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . List of Abbrevations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . INTRODUCTION 0 C O O C O O O O O O O O O O O O O O The Modulation of UDPGT Activity . . . . . . . . . . . The Heterogeneity of UDPGT . . . . . . . . . . . . . METHODS AND MATERIALS 0 O O O O O O O O O C O O O O O O 0 Material Sources . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Animals . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Isolation of Intestinal Microsomes . . . . . . . . . . Assay of PNPGT Activity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Assay of Phenolphthalein GT . . . . . . . . . . . . . Protein and Phosphate Assays . . . . . . . . . . . . . Solubilization of Microsomes and DEAE Chromatography . Sodium Dodecylsulfate-Polyacrylamide Gel ElectrOphoresis Extraction of Microsomal Lipid . . . . . . . . . . . . Preparation of Liposomes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Enzyme Incubation with Liposomes . . . . . . . . . . . RESIILTS O O O O C O I O O O O O O I O O O O O O O O O O O Microsomal Preparation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Assays for PNPGT and Phenolphthalein GT Activity . . . Solubilization Studies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . DEAE Chromatography . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Properties of PNPGT Eluted from the DEAE Column. . Gel Electrophoresis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . DISCUSSION 0 I O O C C O C O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O C The Purification Scheme . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . The Yield of PNPGT Activity After DEAE Chromatography The Elution Profile of UDPGT Activity After DEAE Chromatography . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Phenolphthalein GT and PNPGT . . . . . . . . . . . . . SWARY AND co NCLUS IONS O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 LIST OF REFERENCES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ii Page iii vii \fi 14 14 15 16 16 17 18 18 l9 19 20 20 21 21 29 41 S9 62 76 79 84 85 87 88 89 91 TABLE 10. 11. 12. 13. LIST OF TABLES THE EFFECT OF THE GLYCEROL CONCENTRATION OF THE HOMOGENIZING MEDIUM ON INTESTINAL MICROSOMAL UDP-GLUCURONYLTRANSFERASE ACTIVITY TOWARDS PfNITROPHENOL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . THE LOCALIZATION OF UDP-GLUCURONYLTRANSFERASE ACTIVITY TO- WARDS PfNITROPHENOL IN RABBIT SMALL INTESTINE . . . . . . THE GLUCURONIDATION OF PfNITROPHENOL BY INTESTINAL MICRO- SOMES FROM FED AND FASTED RABBITS . . . . . . . . . . . . . SEX DIFFERENCES IN THE CONJUGATION OF P-NITROPHENOL BY RABBIT INTESTINAL MICROSOMAL UDP-GLUCURONYLTRANSFERASE . . . . . . THE EFFECT OFIG’NAPHTHAFLAVONE OR PBBs ADMINISTRATION ON THE PNPGT ACTIVITY OF RABBIT INTESTINAL MICROSOMES . . . . . . . THE EFFECT OF PHENOBARBITAL ADMINISTRATION ON THE PNPGT ACTIVITY OF RABBIT INTESTINAL MICROSOMES . . . . . . . . . . THE SOLUBILIZATION OF RABBIT INTESTINAL MICROSOMAL PNPGT WITH NONIONIC DETERGENTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . THE EFFECT OF PROTEIN CONCENTRATION ON THE SOLUBILIZATION OF RABBIT INTESTINAL MICROSOMAL PNPGT WITH LUBROL WX . . . . . THE EFFECT OF pH ON THE SOLUBILIZATION OF RABBIT INTESTINAL MICROSOMAL PNPGT WITH LUBROL WX . . . . . . . . . . . . . . THE EFFECT OF TEMPERATURE ON THE SOLUBILIZATION OF RABBIT INTESTINAL MICROSOMAL PNPGT WITH LUBROL WX . . . . . . . . . THE EFFECT OF IONIC STRENGTH ON THE SOLUBILIZATION OF INTESTINAL MICROSOMAL PNPGT WITH LUBROL WX . . . . . . . . . THE EFFECT OF SONICATION ON THE SOLUBILIZATION OF RABBIT INTESTINAL MICROSOMAL PfNITROPHENOL UDP-GLUCURONYLTRANSFERASE WITH LUBROL WK 0 O O O I O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O I 0 THE SOLUBILIZATION OF INTESTINAL MICROSOMAL PNPGT WITH LUBROL wx AND w ITH 0 CTYLGLUCO S IDE 0 O O O O O O O O O O C O Q C O 0 iii PAGE 22 23 24 26 27 28 46 48 49 50 51 52 53 LIST OF TABLES (continued) TABLE pass 14. THE EFFECT OF pH AND IONIC STRENGTH ON THE SOLUBILIZATION OF RABBIT INTESTINAL MICROSOMAL PNPGT WITH OCTYLGLUCOSIDE . . . 58 15. THE PARTIAL PURIFICATION OF RABBIT SMALL INTESTINAL UDP-GLUCURONYLTRANSFERASE ACTIVITY TOWARDS fi-NITROPHENOL AS SUBSTRATE USING SEQUENTIAL DEAE COLUMNS . . . . . . . . . . 61 16. THE PARTIAL PURIFICATION OF RABBIT SMALL INTESTINE UDP-GLUCURONYLTRANSFERASE ACTIVITY TOWARDS E-NITROPHENOL AS SUBSTRATE O O O I O O O O O O O O C O O O C O O O O O O I O .67 17. THE PARTIAL PURIFICATION OF RABBIT SMALL INTESTINE UDP-GLUCURONYLTRANSFERASE ACTIVITY TOWARDS E-NITROPHENOL AS SUBSTRATE O O O I I O O O I O O O O O O I O O O C O O O O O 68 iv LIST OF FIGURES FIGURE PAGE 1. THE DISTRIBUTION OF MICROSOMAL PNPGT ACTIVITY ALONG THE SMALL INTESTINE OF THE RABBIT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30 2. RABBIT INTESTINAL MICROSOMAL PNPGT ACTIVITY AS A FUNCTION OF MICROSOMAL PROTEIN IN THE PNPGT ASSAY . . . . . . . . . . . 32 3. THE EFFECT OF FIVE NONIONIC DETERGENTS ON THE PNPGT ACTIVITY OF RABBIT INTESTINAL MICROSOMES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35 4. THE EFFECT OF THE NONIONIC DETERGENTS, RENEX 690 AND TRITON X-100 , ON THE PNPGT ACTIVITY OF RABBIT INTESTINAL MICRO SOMES I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 37 5. THE EFFECT OF CHOLATE AND DEOXYCHOLATE ON THE PNPGT ACTIVITY OF RABBIT INTESTINAL MICROSOMES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39 6. DOUBLE RECIPROCAL PLOTS INITIAL RATES OF RABBIT INTESTINAL MICROSOMAL UDP-GLUCURONYLTRANSFERASE AS A FUNCTION OF VARYING CONCENTRATIONS OF EfNITROPHENOL AT DIFFERENT FIXED CONCENTRATION UDP-GLUCURONIC ACID . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42 7. DOUBLE RECIPROCOAL PLOTS OF INITIAL VELOCITY AGAINST VARIABLE UDP-GLUCURONIC ACID CONCENTRATIONS IN RABBIT INTESTINAL MICRDWMES I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 44 8. THE DIALYSIS OF OCTYLGLUCOSIDE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 54 9. THE SOLUBILIZATION OF RABBIT INTESTINAL MICROSOMAL UDP-GLUCURONYLTRANSFERASE ACTIVITY TOWARDS PfNITROPHENOL AT VARYING CONCENTRATIONS OF OCTYLGLUCOSIDE . . . . . . . . . . 56 10. DEAE-SEPHACEL COLUMN CHROMATOGRAPHY OF RABBIT INTESTINAL 'EfNITROPHENOL UDP-GLUCURONYLTRANSFERASE ACTIVITY AT pH 8.0, 00602 OCTYLGLUCOSIDE I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 63 11. DEAE-SEPHACEL COLUMN CHROMATOGRAPHY OF RABBIT INTESTINAL PfNITROPHENOL UDP-GLUCURONYLTRANSFERASE ACTIVITY AT pH 8.0, 0.652 OCTYLGLUCOSIDE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 65 12. DOUBLE RECIPROCAL PLOT WITH INITIAL RATES OF UDP-GLUCURONYL TRANSFERASE IN THE DEAE-SEPHACEL COLUMN KCI ELUATE AS A FUNCTION OF VARYING CONCENTRATIONS OF EfNITROPHENOL . . . . 70 13. DOUBLE RECIPROCAL PLOT OF INITIAL RATES OF UDP-GLUCURONYL TRANSFERASE IN THE DEAE-SEPHACEL COLUMN KCI ELUATE AS A FUNCTION OF VARYING CONCENTRATIONS OF UDP-GLUCURONIC ACID AT DIFFERENT FIXED CONCENTRATIONS OF UDP . . . . . . . . . . . 72 v LIST or FIGURES (continued) FIGURE PAGE 14. THE INACTIVATION OF UDP-GLUCURONYLTRANSFERASE ACTIVITY 74 TOWARDS EfNITROPHENOL AS A FUNCTION OF THE PROTEIN TO OCTYLGLUCO 8 IDE RATIO I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 15. SDS DISC PAGE SLAB GEL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 77 vi BHT .GME BSA cpm DEAE DTT EDTA i.p. 3-MC PAGE PB PBB PEG .ENP PNPGT SDS Tris UDP UDPGA UDPGT LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS butylated hydroxtoluene fl-mercaptoethanol bovine serum albumin counts per minute diethylamino ethyl dithiothreitol ethylene diamine tetraacetric acid glucuronyltransferase intraperitoneal 3-methylcholanthrene polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis phenobarbital polybrominated biphenyls polyethylene glycol pfnitrophenol pfnitrophenol:UDP-glucuronyltransferase sodium dodecyl sulphate tris (hydroxymethyl) aminomethane uridine-S-diphosphate uridine diphospho-glucuronic acid UDP glucuronyltransferase vii INTRODUCTION Man is exposed to a wide variety of environmental xenobiotics. The cytotoxicity of a xenobiotic depends in part on its metabolism. Since many xenobiotics are nonpolar and lipid soluble, it is advantageous to convert such xenobiotics into more water soluble compounds, thus facilitating their excretion and limiting the duration of their effect. In order to make them less lipid soluble, many xenobiotics are oxidized, reduced, or hydrolyzed by mammalian enzyme systems. The altered compounds may then be acted upon by transferases which catalyze the conjugation of these compounds with glucuronic acid, glycine, glutathione, or sulfate. Since the resulting conjugates are acidic and are ionized at physiological pH, they are water soluble and readily excreted into the urine and bile. The most common types of conjugates formed with xenobiotics are B-glucuronides. Uridine diphosphate glucuronyl-transferase (UDP-glucuronate-glucuronosyltransferase [acceptor unspecific] E.C.2.4.l.l7) catalyzes the formation of B-glucuronides by transferring the D-glucuronic acid of uridine diphospho-glucuronic acid (UDPGA) to many structurally different aglycones such as phenols and alcohols (l), carboxylic acids (2), amines (3), thiol derivatives (4), and acetylenic derivatives (5). Endogenous compounds, such as bile acids (6), many steriod hormones (7-9), thyroxine (10), and catecholamines (11) are 2 also glucuronidated. The anionic carboxylic acid group of the resulting conjugate facilitates excretion. Some substrates of UDP-glucuronlytransferase (UDPGT) are the products of the mixed-function oxidase systems. These electron transport systems, located in the endoplasmic reticulum, are responsible for the oxidative metabolism of steroids and fatty acids, as well as xenobiotics. They consist of NADPH-cytochrome P-4SO reductase, lipid, and multiple forms of the terminal oxidase, cytochrome P-450. Many compounds, once oxidized to hydroxylated derivatives by these systems, may then serve as substrates for UDPGT. Furthermore, epoxides, sometimes formed by the mixed-function oxidase system, may be converted to hydroxy compounds by epoxide hydrolase. While the hydroxylated compounds are usually more water soluble than their parent compound, glucuronidation of these hydroxlated derivatives greatly increases their solubility. Glucuronidation almost always results in detoxification and may be of great importance in the removal of carcinogenic, mutagenic, and toxic intermediates (12). While in most instances glucuronidation results in the detoxification and excretion of xenobiotics, there are a few instances where glucuronidation results in more reactive xenobiotics. For example, phenacetin (13), and the carcinogens, safrole (4-allyl-1,2-methylenedioxybenzene) (14), and 2-acetyl-aminofluorene (15), are hydroxylated and then glucuronidated. The glucuronides of these compounds bind covalently to tissue macromolecules more readily than their unconjugated parent compounds. 3 Mammalian UDP-glucuronyltransferase activity is located in the endoplasmic reticulum of most tissues of the body including kidney (16), lung (17), skin (18), spleen, brain, heart, thymus (19), and the gastrointestinal mucosa (20). After homogenization, activity is recovered in the microsomal fraction. UDPGT activity has also been found in the nuclear envelope (21). While the liver plays an important role in glucuronidation, intestinal glucuronidation is important as well because the intestine is one of the sites of entry of many xenobiotics into the body. UDPGT and the other xenobiotic metabolizing enzymes found in the intestine, serve as a first line of defense against xenobiotics in the body. Intestinal glucuronidation may have a significant effect on the overall metabolism, disposition, and pharmacokinetics of many xenobiotiotic and endogenous compounds metabolized by the liver. The fate of these compounds is influenced by the intestinal metabolism through the enterohepatic circulation. Hepatocytes excrete glucuronides of xenobiotic and endogenous compounds into the blood or the bile. Glucuronides in the bile enter the intestinal lumen where they may be hydrolyzed by bacterial S-glucuronidase. These metabolites, which have access to the large surface area of the intestine, may once again become glucuronidated. This process in which glucuronides are broken down and reformed may have a pronounced effect on the reactivity and half-life of many xenobiotics and their metabolites (22). For instance, after an intraperitoneal injection of phenobarbital or progesterone, they are excreted in the bile as 4 glucuronides. Saccharolactone, a potent inhibitor of B-glucuronidase, has been shown to shorten the pharmacological action of these drugs (23). The intestinal microsomal mixed-function oxidase systems which are instrumental in xenobiotic metabolism are similar in structure to those in the liver. Cytochrome P-450 dependent polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon hydroxylase activity has been demonstrated in the gastrointestinal wall of man, rabbit, rat, guinea pig, mouse, and hamster. Wattenberg's extensive work on benzo(a)pyrene hydroxylase activity in rat indicated that the intestinal mixed-function oxidase system plays an important role in the detoxification of arylhydrocarbons (24-28). Chhabra and Fouts (29) demonstrated both biphenyl and benzo(a)pyrene hydroxylase activities in the intestinal microsomes of rabbit, guinea pig, rat, and mouse. In some species, cytochrome P-450, and NADPH-cytochrome P-450 reductase were found in relatively high levels. In rabbit intestinal microsomes the cytochrome P-450 content per mg of microsomal protein was 332 that of the liver, while the NADPH-cytochrome P-450 reductase specific activity was 75% that of the liver (29). Some of the hydroxylated aromatic products of the intestinal mixed-function oxidase system have been shown to be glucuronidated by the intestinal mucosa (30). Naphthalene, for instance, is converted by the mixed-function oxidase system to l-naphthol, which in turn is rapidly glucuronidated (31). Aniline is hydroxylated by the mixed-function oxidase system to 27aminophenol which may may then serve S as a substrate for intestinal UDPGT (32). Hydroxlylated metobolites of 7-ethoxycoumarin (33), perazine (34), and biphenyl (35) have also been shown to be effectively glucuronidated in the small intestine. Glucuronidation in the small intestine is also significant because it reduces the effect of many orally administered drugs. As an example, morphine, when administered orally, has diminished analgesic effect when compared to its effect when administered by another route (36). Morphine and several other phenolic drugs have been reported to be poorly absorbed when taken orally while their gfmethylated congeners are absorbed to a greater extent (37). The Modulation of UDPGT Activity: Many questions about UDPGT, both ighzi!2_and in_yi££2, remain to be resolved. Among these questions is how UDPGT activity is modulated awandmmo It is not known how UDPGT activity is regulated in 3112. Experiments comparing the $2 lilo with the ighziggg hepatic or intestinal microsomal activity indicate that for all species studied, UDPGT activity is not fully expressed (38-40). "Latent" is an operational term used to describe the native form of the enzyme; that form found in_yiyg or found in tissue slices which have not been exposed to membrane perturbants. The activity of UDPGT in tissue slices may be increased by exposure to UDP-N-acetylglucosamine which enhances the affinity and specificity of the enzyme for UDPGA, thus making the enzyme more efficient (41). It has not been determined 6 whether or not UDP-N-acetylglucosamine regulates enzyme activity in 1332. The mechanism by which UDPGT activity is enhanced in zitgg is unknown. This enhancement of UDPGT activity ignziggg by mechanical or chemical means is termed ”activation". The activation of UDPGT by membrane perturbing agents is most commonly explained by assuming the breakdown of permeability barriers in the modified membranes (42-44). Vessey and Zakim proposed that activation might also arise from changes in the lipid-protein interaction (45). The activity of hepatic microsomal UDPGT in ziggg reflects the manner in which the microsomes are treated. A variety of conditions and agents which effect the integrity of the microsomal membrane to which UDPGT is bound have a pronounced effect on the activity of the enzyme. Studies on the effects of phospholipases, detergents, trypsin, freezing, and ultrasonication indicate that altering the microsomal environment has a marked effect on hepatic UDPGT activity. With membrane disruption, a biphasic activation-inactivation of enzyme activity is often observed. Zakim and Vessey (46) were able to activate rat, guinea pig, and rabbit microsomal UDPGT with phospholipase A. Continuation of phospholipase A treatment, after peak activity was reached, resulted in a decline in UDPGT activity. While ultrasonication of guinea pig microsomes initially activated UDPGT, prolonged ultrasonication produced a decrease in UDPGT activity (47). Low levels of the anionic detergent, deoxycholate, and the nonionic detergent, Triton X-100, activate guinea pig, mouse, and rat microsomal 7 UDPGT (48-49), although loss of activity is observed at high concentations of detergent. UDPGT activity may vary not only with the way in which microsomes are treated, but may also vary with the organ from which the microsomes are obtained. Comparative studies on naphthol glucuronidation with intestinal loops $2.3l22.and with mucosal homogenates innzi££g_suggests that intestinal UDPGT is latent in the intact tissue, as is the liver enzyme, and can be effected by a variety of membrane perturbing treatments (50). Aitio (51) studied the effect of phospholipase C, digitonin, and trypsin on UDPGT activity in rat liver and small intestinal microsomes. Digitonin had a negligible effect on intestinal UDPGT while it greatly enhanced liver activity. Although hepatic UDPGT was activated by trypsin and phospholipase C treatments, intestinal UDPGT activity was depressed. Del Villar g£_al3 (52) demonstrated a difference in response of intestinal and hepatic microsomes to Triton X-100. The intestinal microsomal UDPGT might be activated to a greater extent than the hepatic enzyme and therefore respond differently to various membrane perturbing treatments. Since trypsin, phospholipase C, and surface active agents, like bile salts, are constituents of the small intestinal lumen, UDPGT might be spontaneously activated during the microsomal isolation procedure by these endogenous surface active agents (50). Zakim and Vessey (S3) and Wisnes (54) investigated the kinetic properties of hepatic pfnitrophenol:glucuronyltransferase (PNGT) activated by various membrane perturbing treatments. The activated 8 form of the enzyme was inhibited by UDP and UDP-sugars, had a decreased affinity for UDPGA and pfnitrophenol, and was insensitive to UDP-N-acetylglucosamine. It has been proposed (55) that the altered kinetic properties of PNPGT, after treatment with membrane perturbants, are due to an altered enzyme conformation brought about by changes in the lipid environment. When Gorski and Kasper (56) separated 982 of the phospholipid from rat liver microsomal protein, using gel filtration, PNPGT activity was reduced to 0-62 of its original activity. By incubating the lipid depleted PNPGT with liposomes derived from microsomes, 30 to 442 of the original activity was restored. Besides mixed microsomal lipid, phosphatidylcholines, both synthetic and natural, restored PNPGT activity. Tukey SE E£° (57) found that phosphatidylcholine and lysophosphatidylcholine were most effective in restoring the activity of partially purified rabbit liver PNPGT which had been depleted of lipid. Burchell and Hallinan (58) were able to activate rat liver PNPGT, purified to homogeneity and containing very little phospholipid, 40-1002 by incubation with phosphatidyl - and lysophosphatidyl - choline. With the addition of phosphatidyl - and lysophospha - tidyl-choline to lipid depleted guinea pig liver PNPGT, Erickson g£_al. (59) achieved a 50 fold stimulation of PNPGT activity. The length and degree of unsaturation of the acyl chains appeared to have a significant influence on the reactivation of PNPGT. Phosphatidylserine and phosphatidylethanolamine did not reactivate the enzyme. The Heterogeneity of UDPGT: There are several indications that UDPGT consists of a heterogeneous group of enzymes. Some glucuronyltransferase activities have been separated from each other during the course of purification (60-64). Recent work suggests that at least two forms of glucuronyltransferase exist in the rat which differ in tissue distribution, inducibility by xenobiotics and glucocorticoids, substrate specificity and perinatal deveIOpment. Hepatic glycuronyltransferase activity towards several groups of substrates is differentially induced. Many microsomal drug metabolizing enzymes are induced preferentially by the model inducer, 3-methylcholanthrene, while other enzymes are induced preferentially by another model inducer, phenobarbital. Glucuronyltransferase activity toward one group of substrates, which includes pfnitrOphenol, l-naphthol, and 2-aminophenol, is induced by 3-MC (65). Glucuronidation of another group of substrates, which includes morphine, phenolphthalein, and chloramphenicol, is induced by PB (65-66). Neither PB or 3-MC induce steriod glucuronidation (61). Hepatic glucuronidation of different substrates follows different developmental patterns (67-68). The activity towards that group of substrates which is induced by 3-MC reaches adult levels during the late fetal stage of development, while that activity which is induced by PB, does not reach adult levels until 2 days after birth. Wishart (67) has termed these two groups of substrates "late fetal" and "neonatal". The "late fetal" substrates include l-naphthol, 2-aminophenol, and E-nitrophenol, corresponding to that group of 10 substrates whose conjugation is induced by 3-MC; while the "neonatal" group inculdes phenolphthalein, morphine, bilirubin, and estradiol. Conjugation of this group of substrates is induced by PB. Having demonstrated that the synthetic glucocorticoid, dexamethasome, precociously induces transferase activity towards the ”late fetal" group, but not to the "neonatal" group, Wishart proposed that fetal glucocorticoids may induce transferase activity towards the "late fetal” group. The activity towards the ”neonatal" group may be unresponsive to glucocorticoids or may require an additional endogenous agent(s) for induction to occur. The "neonatal" and ”late fetal" group of substrates have have different tissue distribution (69). Transferase activity towards the "late foetal" group of substrates is ubiquitous, being found in such tissues as the liver, kidney, small intestine, lung, skin, and spleen, while activity towards the ”neonatal" group of substrates is found primarily in the liver and intestine, being undetectable or barely detectable in other tissues. It has been proposed that the substrate specificity of the various forms of transferase is based, in part, on the size and shape of the substate (66). According to the hypothesis developed by Wishart 35 3%,, that form of glucuronyltransferase, inducible by 3-MC, whose activity reaches adult levels at the late foetal stage of development, is specific for substrates which are planar. That glucuronyltransferase inducible by PB, whose activity reaches adult 11 levels neonatally, is specific towards phenolic compounds with bulky £251 substituents. This proposal is supported by Wishart's studies on the perinatal development of the glucuronidation of a series of phenols substituted with alkyl groups in the £251 position. The glucuronidation of phenols which had relatively small alkyl groups in the p§£a_position attained adult levels during the late foetal stage of development, while glucuronidation of those phenols which had bulky alkyl groups attained adult levels neonatally. The same developmental pattern was demonstrated for a series of phenols with alkyl substituents in the 9323 or in the EEEBE position. While studies on the perinatal development, induction, and tissue distribution of rat liver glucuronyltransferase have provided evidence for the functional heterogeneity of UDPGT, evidence for the true molecular heterogeneity of UDPGT has been provided by the purification of UDPGT. Early attempts at the purification of UDPGT from liver microsomes were hindered by enzyme instability and inadequate solubilization, but recent techniques have been more successful in overcoming these problems. Using DEAE- and UDP-affinity chromatography, in the presence of nonionic detergents, several investigators have been able to separate and purify to apparent homogeneity a hepatic glucuronyltransferase with activity towards small phenolic substrates from a glucuronytransferase with activity towards bulky substrates. Burchell g£_gl. have purified rat liver bilirubin GT from rat liver p-nitrophenol GT (62). The purified rat liver PNPGT had 12 activity towards I-naphthol,'p-nitrophenol, and gfaminophenol in approximately the same ratio as in the liver homogenate suggesting that a single microsomal enzyme is responsible for the glucuronidation of these substrates (70-71). This enzyme also had slight activity towards morphine. Bock EEHELB have purified morphine GT and PNPGT from the rat liver (61). While the purified PNPGT had no detectable activity towards morphine and testosterone, the purified morphine GT had no detectable activity towards pfnitrophenol. Tukey 25 al. have purified, to apparent homogeneity, estrone GT and p-nitrophenol GT, from the rabbit liver (63-64). The purified estrone CT showed no activity towards PNPGT while the PNPGT had some activity towards estrone. Recently rat liver testosterone CT was purified by Matern 25 al. This purified transferase had no detectable activity towards estrone, bilirubin, p-nitrophenol or morphine (72). Tukey g£_gl, concluded that the estrone and p-nitrophenol glucuronytransferases were definitely different proteins based on their physical properties (64). Both enzymes had subunit molecular weights of 57,000 and gel chromatography indicated that both enzymes existed as tetramers with an apparent molecular weight of 230,000. However, with polyacrylamide isoelectric focusing, PNPGT had an isoelectric point of 6.8, while estrone GT had an isoelectric point of 7.6. Amino acid analysis of the purified enzymes revealed that PNPGT contained 53% hydrophobic amino acids, while estrone GT contained 602 hydrophobic amino acids. Furthermore, limited proteolysis, in the presence of SDS, 13 produced distinct differences in the peptide map composition of the two enzymes. Richard Jagger and Steven Aust at Michigan State University have studied the activity of rabbit intestinal UDP-glucuronyltranferases towards several substrates. At this time, it is not known whether one transferase or several transferases are responsible for the glucuronidation of these substrates. Nor is it known whether the intestinal transferase(s) and the liver transferases which glucuronidate these substrates, are identical proteins. Knowledge of substrate specificity would enhance the understanding of drug interactions and of the toxicity of xenobiotics. For instance, ingestion of significant amounts of a substance which is a substrate for PNPGT might limit the glucuronidation of other PNPGT substrates. Such substrates might remain in the intestinal lumen longer than they would otherwise. Glucuronidation of substrates brought to and from the intestine through enterohepatic circulation might also be effected. Little is known on the substrate specificity of intestinal PNPGT(S) nor is it known whether liver and intestinal PNPGT are identical proteins. Purifying PNPGT(s) from rabbit intestinal microsomes would help clarify these and other questions. UDPGT has yet to be purified from the small intestine. The work in Dr. Aust's lab was undertaken to establish procedures for the purification of rabbit intestinal microsomal PNPGT. The purification of PNPGT requires a procedure for the large scale preparation of rabbit intestinal microsomes with stable PNPGT activity, 14 as well as a non-denaturing procedure for the solubilization of PNPGT. Once PNPGT is purified to homogeneity, its kinetic properties, physical properties, and substrate specificity can be better studied. METHODS AND MATERIALS Material Sources: B-Glucuronidase, DEAE-Sephacel,.p-nitrophenol (spectrophotomeric grade), phenophthalein, UDP (sodium salt), UDPGA (ammonium salt, 98% grade), UDP-N-acetylglucosamine, butylated hydroxytoluenefl3 -mercaptoethanol, heparin (soduim salt, Sigma Grade I), chicken ovomucoid trypsin inhibitor (Type II-O), egg yolk phosphatidylcholine crude soybean phoshatidylcholine, chlorhexidine, Dextran Blue 2000, Brilliant Blue R, sodium dodecyl sulfate, phenylmethylsulfonylfluoride, polyethylene glycol (approximate weight 400), bovine serum albumin (98% fatty acid free) Lubrol WX, and Tris base were obtained from Sigma Chemical Company, St. Louis, Missouri. B-Naphthaflavone was obtained from Aldrich Chemical Company, Milwaukee, Wisconsin. Phenobarbital (sodium U.S.P.) was purchased from Merck and Company Inc., Rahway, New Jersey. Firemasters PBB, manufactured by Michigan Chemical Corporation, St. Louis, Michigan, was obtained from the Michigan Department of Agriculture, Lansing, Michigan. 3-MC, acrylamide, methylenebisacrylamide and tetramethylenediamine were purchased from Eastman Organic Chemicals, Rochester, New York. Octyl-B -D-glucopyranoside, and saccharo-1,4-lactone were obtained from Calbiochem-Behring Corporation, La Jolla, California. Triton X-100 (scintillation grade) and Aquasol 2 were purchased from New England Nuclear, Boston, Massachusetts. C14octylglucoside was synthesized 15 16 by Paul Rosevear of Michigan State University. Emulgen 911 was a gift from the Kao-Alto Company, Tokyo, Japan. Renex 690 was a gift from Janice Lacedo of ICI, Wilmington, Delaware. Cholate and deoxycholate were recrystalized from ethanol. All other chemicals were reagent grade. Animals Animals, outbread male Sprague-Dawley rats and New Zealand White rabbits were purchased from Spartan Research Animals, Inc., Haslett, Michigan. The rabbits ranged in weight from 2 to 5 kilograms and the rats from 225 to 250 grams. Water and Purina chow were given ad libitum. For enzyme induction studies, rabbits were pretreated with PBBS, or with B-naphithaflavone, or with phenobarbital. B-Naphthaflavone was dissolved in polyethylene glycol (MW 400) at 37°C, with vigorous stirring, to a concentration of 60mg/ml. The 37°C solution was immediately injected into the rabbits. Rabbits were injected i.p. with 80 mg/kg. Control rabbits were injected with polyethylene glycol. The rabbits were sacrificed 40 hours after they were injected. Firemasters PBBs were dissolved in polyethylene glycol (MW 400) in a boiling water bath for several hours, to a concentration of 45mg/ml. The solution was equilibrated to ambient temperature. Rats and rabbits were injected with 90 mg/kg 7 days prior to sacrifice. Control rabbits and rats were injected with 2 ml/kg polyethylene glycol. 17 A 0.2% solution of phenobarbital in distilled water was adjusted to pH 7.5-7.8 with concentrated HCl. The solution was diluted 1:1 with tap water and given to rabbits ad libitum for 7 days~prior to sacrifice. Isolation of Intestinal Microsomes Rat and rabbit microsomes were isolated by a method modified from that of Stohs 35 El“ (73). Rabbits were sacrified by a blow to the head, rats by decapitation. The rabbit small intestine was immediately excised from the pylorus to 5 cm proximal to the ileocecal valve. The rat small intestine was excised to the first 25 cm of the duodenum. The intestinal lumen was washed vigorously with an ice cold solution containing 20 mM Tris-HCI pH 7.4, 20% glycerol, 154 mM KCl, and 5 mM EDTA. Excess fat was trimmed from the outer intestinal wall and the intestine was then placed in the above solution. Four ml of this solution was used per gm wet weight of small intestine. To this solution was added chicken ovomucoid trypsin inhibitor (6 mg/gm wet wt. small intestine), and 5 U/ml heparin. The intestine was minced with scissors and homogenized in a glass Teflon Potter-Elvehjem homogenizer at 500 rpm and immediately centrifuged at 10,000 g for 20 minutes. The supernatant was poured through four layers of cheese cloth and centrifuged at 105,000 g for 90 minutes. The microsomal pellet was washed once by suspension and recentrifugation in three volumes of isotonic KCl. The final pellet was suspended in 50 mM Tris-HCl, 50% glycerol, 2uM butylated hydroxytoluene pH7.4, to a protein concentration of 40 to 50 mg/ml and stored under argon at -20°C. 18 Assay of PNPGT Activity Rabbit intestinal PNPGT activity, unless otherwise stated was assayed by a modification of Lucier's colorimetric assay (74). From 0.25 to 1.0 mg of protein was assayed in 1.4 ml of an assay mixture containing 0.15 M Tris-H01, 2.0 mM p-nitrophenol, 10 mM MgC12, and 3 mM UDPGA. When assaying microsomes, the assay mixture also contained 0.013% (w/v) Triton X-100 per mg of protein. The assay mixture was preincubated for 5 minutes at 37°C. With the addition of UDPGA, the reaction was initiated. Substrate dissappearance was monitored continuously at 425 nm with a Cary 219 double beam spectrophotometer on the reverse beam mode with a 2.0 nm slit width and using cuvettes 0.2 cm wide. The reference cuvette contained the assay mixture without UDPGA. The extintion coefficient for p-nitrophenol at 425 nm in 0.15 M Tris-HCl, 10 mM MgC12, 3 mM UDPGA, pH 7.4 at 37°C is 9.5 uM'lcm'l. Rat intestinal PNPGT activity was assayed by a modification of the colorimetric method developed by Grote ggngl. (75). 1.5 mg of protein was assayed in 0.5 ml of an assay mixture containing 0.05 M Tris-HCl pH 7.4, 0.15 M KCl, 0.05% Triton X-100, 10 mM MgC12, 0.6 mM 'p-nitrophenol, and 5.0 mM UDPGA. After preincubation at 37°C, the reaction was started by adding UDPGA to the reaction mixture and stopped by adding 50u1 aliquots of the reaction mixture to 1.0 ml of 2% trichloroacetic acid (w/v). After standing in trichloroacetic acid for 10 minutes, the assay mixture was centrifuged for 10 minutes at 2000 g l9 and the supernatant made more alkaline with the addition of 50ul of 5 N KDH. The absorbance was measured at 403 nm. Assay of Phenolphthalein GT Rabbit intestinal phenophthalein GT activity was assayed by a modification of a method developed by Wisnes (76). One mg of protein was assayed in 0.5 ml of an assay mixture containing 75 mM Tris-Maleate pH 7.4, 20 mg/ml BSA, 10 mM MgC12, 0.45 mM phenolphthalein and 4.3 mM UDPGA. After preincubation at 37°C, the reaction was started by adding UDPGA to the reaction mixture and stOpped by adding 100 ul aliquots of the reaction mixture to 400 ul of 0.5 M glycine buffer pH 10.4. The reduction in absorbance at 550 nm was read immediately with a Cary 219 double beam spectrometer on the reverse beam mode with a 0.75 nm slit width. The extinction coefficient for phenolphthalein at 550 nm in 0.5M glycine buffer pH 10.4 is 1.3 x loZuM'lcm'l. Protein and Phosphate Assays: Protein concentrations were estimated as described by Lowry §£_§l. (77), using BSA standards. Phosphate determinations were performed by the method of Bartlett (78). Solubilization of Microsomes and DEAE Chromathography: All steps were performed at 4°C. All buffers were deaerated and flushed with argon. Solubilization of Intestinal Microsomes: Unless otherwise stated, the rabbit intestinal microsomes were solubilized using B-D-octylglucoside. Microsomes were suspended to a 20 protein concentration of 10 mg/ml in 50 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.0, 1% octylglucoside, 20% glycerol, 100 mM KCl, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM 8MB, and 0.002% (v/v) Chlorhexidine. The suspension was sonicated, (4 x 20 s.) using a Branson sonifier with a microtip at a power setting of 6 (7 1/2 amperes), and centrifuged at 105,000 g for 2 1/2 hours. DEAE-Sephacel Chromatography: The 105,000 g supernatant was diluted 1:2, stirring gently but constantly, with 20% glycerol, 0.4% octylglucoside, and applied to a DEAE-Sephacel column (1:20, width:height) previously equilibrated with 50 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.0, 0.6% octylglucoside, 20% glycerol, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM BME, and 0.002% Chlorhexidine. Five mg of protein was applied per ml of DEAE-Sephacel at a flow rate of 12 m1/h. The column was then washed with 2 column volumes of equilibration buffer. PNPGT activity was eluted with a linear 0 to 0.05 M KCl gradient in 4 volumes of equilibration buffer. The void volume was determined using Dextran Blue 2000. Sodium Dodecylsulfate-Polyacrylamide Gel Electrophoresis: Discontinous sodium dodecylsulfate-polyacrylamide slab gel electrophoresis was performed according to the method of O'Farrell (79). A 4.75% stacking gel and a 7.5% running gel was used. After electrophoresis, gels were stained with Brillian Blue R. The molecular weight markers run in parallel with all membrane protein samples were ovalbumin, glutamate dehydrogenase, catalase, and bovine serum albumin. 21 Extraction of Microsomal Lipid: The extraction of lipid from intestinal microsomes was performed by the method of Folch ggugl. (80). All steps were carried out at 4°C. All buffers were flushed with nitrogen. Three grams of intestinal microsomes were extracted with 200 ml of 2:1 chloroform-methanol (v/v) and the insoluble material removed by filtration. The lipid extract was washed four times with a solution containing chloroform, methanol, and Folch salt solution in respective proportions of 3:48:47 by volume. The upper phases from the first three washes were discarded. The washed lipid extract was dried by rotary vacuum evaporation. The lipid was dissolved in 5 ml of 2:1 chloroform methanol and stored at -20°C under argon. Preparation of Liposomes: Aqueous suspensions of lipid were prepared by sonication at 4°C. An aliquot of lipid solution was transferred to a thin walled plastic tube and dried under nitrogen. Deaerated 0.15 M Tris-H01 pH 7.4 was added to the lipid, the tube capped under argon, and the suspension vigorously vortexed. The tube was then placed in an opening of a 3 necked vessel filled with water. The microtip of the Branson sonifier was placed in another opening of the vessel. The lipid suspension was sonicated (4x20 3) at a power setting of 6 (7 1/2 amperes). Enzyme Incubation with Liposomes: Fractions from the DEAE-Sephacel column were added to the liposomal suspensions with vigorous vortexing and left standing for six hours at 4°C. The protein-lipid preparations were then assayed for PNPGT activity by a method modified from that of Lucier 25 El. (74). RESULTS Microsomal Preparation: The procedure used for the preparation of rabbit microsomes was a modification of the method developed by Stohs g£_al, (73) for the isolation of rat intestinal microsomes with stable cytochrome P-450. Rabbit intestinal microsomes, prepared using the modified method, had a specific activity of 24 112.1 nmoles p-nitrophenol conjugated per minute per mg of microsomal protein, with a range in specific activity of 21 to 27. The average microsomal protein yield from one small intestine was 320 mg (6mg/g wet weight), to give an average of 7680 total units of PNPGT activity. Microsomal PNPGT activity was stable for at least 6 months, when the microsomes were stored under agron at -20°C. The effects of changing various aspects of Stohs' isolation procedure on the yield of PNPGT activity was studied. Increasing the concentration of glycerol in the homogenizing medium above the 20% (v/v) used in Stohs' method, decreased the total units of activity (Table 1). In Stohs' procedure, microsomes are isolated from the upper villous layer of the mucosa. A comparision between microsomes taken from the whole wall, with those from the mucosal lining, showed that mucosal microsomes had a 30% higher specific activity. However 20% more total units of PNPGT activity were obtained by isolating microsomes from the whole wall (Table 2). Stohs derived microsomes from rats which were not fasted. When rabbits were fasted for 24 hours 22 23 TABLE 1. THE EFFECT OF THE GLYCEROL CONCENTRATION OF THE HOMOGENIZING MEDIUM 0N INTESTINAL MICROSOMAL UDP-GLUCURONYLTRANSFERASE ACTIVITY TOWARDS p-NITROPHENOL. % Glycerol PNPGT Specific Activity Total PNPGT Activity (v/v) nmole p-intropenol con- nmole p-nitrophenol jugated/min per mg conjugated/min 0 9.1 2000 10 9.6 1860 20 9.1 1640 30 10.2 1470 PNPGT activity was assayed by the method of Lucier g£_§l. (74) as described under "Methods". 24 TABLE 2. THE LOCALIZATION OF UDP-GLUCURONYLTRANSFERASE ACTIVITY TOWARDS E-NITROPHENOL IN RABBIT SMALL INTESTINE. PNPGT Specific Activity nmole p-nitropenol con- Total PNPGT Activity nmole p-nitrophenol jugated/min per mg conjugated/min Whole Intestine 9.13 i 1.8 1100 j: 70 Mucosal Lining 13.4 _-+_- 2.1 950 j; 172 The mucosal lining of the small intestine was obtained by scraping the everted small intestine with the edge of a glass slide. PNPGT activity was assayed by the method of Lucier g£_§l. (74) as described under "Methods”. 25 prior to sacrifice these rabbits had slightly higher PNPGT specific activities than microsomes from nonfasted rabbits (Table 3), but more total units of microsomal PNPGT activity were obtained from nonfasted rabbits. Stohs only used rats which were male. With rabbits, microsomes had a similar PNPGT specific activity whether derived from male or female animals (Table 4). In an effort to increase the specific activity and yield of PNPGT, rabbits were treated with several chemicals, known to induce enzymes for the metabolism of xenobiotics, prior to sacrifice. Pretreatment of rabbits with 3-MC type inducersf3-naphthaflavone or P888 did not increase microsomal PNPGT specific activity or yield (Table 5). Likewise, pretreatment of rabbits with phenobarbital did not increase yield (Table 6). Unlike rabbits, pretreatment of rats with P383 resulted in increased PNPGT specific activity. Rat microsomes, obtained from the 25 cm distal to the stomach pylous of intestines of rats not pretreated with PBBS, had a PNPGT specific activity of 25 nmoles p-nitrophenol conjugated per minute per mg of microsomal protein, while microsomes obtained from rats which were pretreated had a specific activity of 42. The effect of changing several chemicals in the homogenizing medium used in Stohs' isolation procedure on the stability of microsomal PNPGT was examined. Stohs' method used soybean trypsin inhibitor to increase the stability of rat cytrochome P-450 during the microsomal preparation. In the of intestinal microsomes, it was found that the addition of chicken ovomucoid trypsin inhibitor, along with 26 TABLE 3. THE GLUCURONIDATION OF‘BfNITROPHENOL BY INTESTINAL MICROSOMES FROM FED AND FASTED RABBITS. Treatment PNPGT Specific Activity nmole p-intropenol con- Total PNPGT Activity nmole pfnitrophenol jugated/min per mg conjugated/min Fasted 9.6 1210 Fed 8.2 1600 Fasted rabbits were given water §d_libitum but no food for 24 hours prior to sacrifice. PNPGT activity was assayed by the method of Lucier 32.2}! (74) as described under "Methods." 27 TABLE 4. SEX DIFFERENCES IN THE CONJUGATION OF RfNITROPHENOL BY INTESTINAL MICROSOMAL UDP-GLUCURONYLTRANSFERASE. Sex PNPGT Specific Activity Total PNPGT Activity nmole p-intropenol con- nmole pfnitrophenol jugated/min per mg conjugated/min Female 13.0 i 1.2 1320 i 92 Male 11.2 + 0.8 1010 i 81 PNPGT activity was assayed by the method of Lucier SE 31. (74) as described under "Methods". 28 .A¢NV nmm.mm nouonq «0 venues vmuwwvosms oSu kn mohmmmm mas muw>wuom Homzm one :.mvo:uoz: nova: vonwuomov mm ouumwuomm ou nowua mane m mmmm wx\wa om sues no .moummuomm ou uoaum n ow oco>mammsunamclm wx\wa ow nufia .a.H wouuonaa mums mufinnmm o-~ mmm m oco>mammcusam21m ooo~ cow om mmmm oowm com a 0:02 aaa\voumwaficoo we use c«a\voumw=ficoo Hoeocaouuwch,oHoan Awav Hoconqouuactm oHoa: zua>auo< Homzm Hmuoe :fiououm Hmuoe >uq>uuo< oamwoonm Homzm unoaumouh .mmzomomon A9H>HHQ< Homzm mzH zo onH<4m<=ezm<2I mo Hommmm Nah .n m4m<8 29 .Aqmv uwm.mm umwonq mo wonuoa commavoac: man he nmxmmmm mm: Homzm :.mvo:uoz: Home: confluence mm mowwauomm ou HOwua mama m you anuqnufi.mm nouns wcaxcauv uuwzu cw muwnnmu ou co>ww mus Hmuunumnoewnm N~.o SE S H 8m m.~ H «.2 33.25855 8:. ow H a? m; H 3.. 8oz :«a\voumw=fi:oo we use :ua\vmumwsfiaou Hocmcmouuchm.oHoac Awav Hoconmouuqclm.oaoac xua>uno< amaze Hence seasons Lance aua>auo< camaoaam amaze acoauaoue .mmzomoxUHz 4HHU< Humzm mzh zo 20H mzb zo onHov amamm on“ «o acmumommmvoe m was cows: ousvoooua m mama: :mvocuoz: none: confluence mm commune was Humzm .dem< Humzm mzh zH szeomm AHHU< Humzm ABH>HHU< Humzm Nah zo wHZMU¢MHma UHZOHZCZ m>Hm mo Hommmm mze .m muamfim . 33 .8923 .o 33. asamseoocoo m o to ad ad 3 o 37 c on 8 I I I c / . c . i 2: .a .. .. . — — w o! m 8, 87x 8.5 8m 8m MAW lSde 9411398 % 38 Figure 4. THE EFFECT OF THE NONIONIC DETERGENTS, RENEX 690 AND TRITON X-100, ON THE PNPGT ACTIVITY OF RABBIT INTESTINAL MICROSOMES. Intestinal microsomes were assayed by the method of Lucier 35 El. (74) as described under "Methods", except that the indicated type and final concentration of detergent were used. 200 150 ‘ 100 "la Relative PNPGT Activity 01 O O 39 WP / Renex 690 #1 a l I 5 15 25 0 Concentration (w/v) at Detergent (%)110'3 Figure 5. 40 THE EFFECT OF THE CHOLATE AND DEOXYCHOLATE ON THE PNPGT ACTIVITY OF RABBIT INTESTINAL MICROSOMES. Intestinal microsomes were assayed as described under "Methods", except that the indicated type and concentration of detergent were used. -v-‘u-u--u - .‘I U- °/o Relative PNPGT Actlvtty 100 41 Concentration (w/v) ot Detergent (7o) 42 the incubation mixture had no effect on the reaction rate. The effect of nonionic detergents on the apparent activity of phenolphthalein GT differed from their effect on the activity of PNPGT. Unlike PNPGT, phenolphthalein CT was not activated by relatively low levels of octylglucoside. At levels greater than 0.55% (w/v), the rate of change of absorbance at 555 nm decreased. Phenolphthalein was insoluble when concentrations of Triton X-100 as low as 0.001% (w/v) were added to the incubation mixture. The kinetic properties of rabbit intestinal microsomal PNPGT were studied. The apparent Km of microsomal PNPGT for p-nitrophenol was 0.3 mM at a UDP-glucuronic acid concentration of 3 mM, (Figure 6) and for UDP-glucuronic acid was 0.2 mM at a ErnitrOphenol concentration of 2 mM (Figure 7). Five mM UDP-N-acetylglucosamine had no effect on the detergent activated enzyme. Solubilization Studies: Because the instability of glucuronyltransferase hindered its characterization, the solubilization of rabbit intestinal PNPGT with the relatively mild nonionic detergents - Lubrol WX, Emulgen 911, and octylglucoside - was examined. In order to solubilize microsomal protein, buffered detergent was added to the microsomes and the resulting suspension was sonicated and centrifuged. Lubrol WX and Emulgen 911 were used in the initial solubilization studies. Table 7 shows the result of this experiment. After treatment with 0.5% Lubrol WX, 19% of the original PNPGT activity was detected in the 2 1/2 h, 180,000 x g supernatant. Increasing the Lubrol WX 43 4:23 2:. A325” .8325; .on same one: meow ouaounosawlmaa mo unequmuuaooaoo as? .afiououa Hmaomouoaa no we won :«a use woumwsficou Hoaonaouufich. mo moaoac mm nowmouaxo can :mvozuoz: Home: wonfiuommv mm moaomouofia aw huu>wuum ommuowmamuuHhaousozawimas mo :ofiumcfiaumumv mum» Hmfiuucw co comma ma ucaoa comm .QHU< UHzomDUDAUImQD mo monH ho ZOHHUZDm < m4 mm<¢mmmzuuom cannonwcmuuazaousozawlmaa mo coaumcfiauouov oumu Hmauwca no women ma uaaoa comm .mmzomOMUHz A HmZH¢U< VHHUOAM> A\>V Nmm .o.s In owuon amEOmouomE Humzm ~muou ngOm we won :«E\ oumwsm ~mcmwwuo uo N Iouoma dmcmwmuo mo N Icoo fioconaouuwcl egos: ammuoum ~QBOH >um>muo< Humzm deuOH >um>muo< omumooam Homzm ucmwuouoo .mHzmummHmo OHZOHZOZ 18H: Homzm A<20momuH2 A\>v Nmm .o.~ ma uquom Hmaomouoaa Humzm Hmuou Hmaom we you :Ha\vmumw:n AHa\wav Hmcuwfiuo mo N Iouoaa Hmcwwuuo mo N Icoo Hocwsaouuuotm moaoac coaumuucwocoo samuoum Hmuoe >ua>auo< Homzm Hmuoe zuw>wuo< owwwomam Humzm ucwwumuwn aaououm Hmauaam .x3 Joanna IHH3 Homzm A\>v wa :Q vmumowccfi mnu mo Humans owuom Hmsomouofia Homzm Amuou Hmaom we mom :«a vmumwsn Hmcawauo mo N Iouoaa Hmcawfiuo mo N Icoo HocwcaoHUficl moHoa: :Hmuoum sauce aua>auo< yoazm Hades auu>quo< oamauoam eoazm ucmwuwuon u\>v NmN .o.m In oua>auow . amaomouowa Humzm Hmuou Hmaom we won :Na\voumw2n Hmcwwauo no N Iououa Hmafimwuo «0 N Icoo Hocwnaouuwan.oHoac :aououm deuce aua>fiuu< aomzm Hmuos Nua>fiuu< uouaumam somzm unassumaaua 4\>v NmN .c.~ :a ofiuow Hmaomouuwa Homzm Hmuou Hmaom we won :wa\voummsfi Hmcumuuo mo N Iououa Hmcwwauo mo N Icoo HocmsqouuNCLm.mHoac uwuwsmlo< mums seasons Hmuoe aufi>fiuu< eoaza dance mua>fiuu< camuomam yuazm mo muaumfioz A\>v Nmu .e.N ma uua>uuom owwuomam Homzm m :UHB :Nmuouq Hmaomouowa Ha\wa OH oq we 0N no a.q w.m~ cofiumowcom mm mN mm ~N m.m o.m coaumoucom oz .uam .ummmm .umm .ummsm .umm\ .ummam cumuoud Hmuou >uu>auom Amaomouowa Humzm Amoco HmEOm we mod :Na\vmumw:fi amcuwwuo no N Iouofia Hmcfiwauo «o N Icoo HocmnaouufiaLN mace: :«muoum Hmuoe Nua>wuu< Homzm Houoe Nuq>auo< ouwaooam Homzm osmsummua .x: Joanna =HH2 mm<¢mmmz\>v New .m.~ ea Hozumfiue 2a om Doc um vmxfie mm: .- mo >uw>uuom Homzm ofimwomam m nu“: :Nmuoud Hmeomouofie He\we ON mm as ON on q me No.2 mvamoosawfiacoo on «e w~ No a md Nom.o x3 Nouns; .umm .uwmsm .umm .ummem .umm .ummim cwwuoua Hmuou muw>fiuom Hmeomouoqe Humzm Hmuou Hmeom we use e«e\kumw:n Nmerauo «o N louowe Hmeawuuo «0 N Icoo HocmnaouuweLm.mHoee cfimuoua Aesop sufi>auu< amaze sauce >u3>auu< ofiufiomam amaze samwumuma .maumousgquhoo 024 N3 Joanna =9H3 Homzm Aauom Huezm now vohmmmm use mueos N\~ N you w x coo.mo~ um cowumwSNNuuemu as vwamamua .mvamooeawdzuuo No.~ cam .oeavwxmnuoazo NNoo.o .Hox zeoo~ H..m: zea .aouooaaw A>\>v NON .Huxlmwua 2e om uoq um vmxwe was we awe :He\vmumw=neou HoemnmoauNeLm.mmHoee «N No >uu>auom oawfiooqm Homzm m nu“: cumuoua Hmeomouowe He\we 0a an 0N mm Ho¥+ ea mm on o.m ea amen an we an Ho¥+ am am as m.~ za amen an me we Hoxl me mm mm m.a za Hmzu on No me Hox+ se mm an s.~ ze amzu cfimuoam Hauou Nua>auom Hmeomououe Hoezm Hmuou Hmeom we use cae\voumw=m Hecawaao mo N Ioaoae Hmcawaao «o N Icoo Hocozdouuaclm.maoec :ewuoae emuoa eue>auu< amaze amuoa eua>auu< oeeeumem amaze ucwaumwaa moumooaqoaweoc 29H: Hoeze Adzowomouz A easaoo n sums vsusas as: eua>muos Hueze ssh .uswmsn acmusunmdmsvs mo mse3~o> m sum: vssmms as: ceeaoo ssh .n\~e a susu 30am s as .A>\>v .scmpmxsnuo~;o Neom.m .mz zau .«aem 2a ne.m .A>\>e uoamueuw ume .oeuaooaumueuuo Nu.m .m.a ea umeuauua :e ON "gum: vsusunmdwsvs casaoo Asosnesmlm\>v ecumoeum Noe .meeaooaumueuuo um.m .m.a me Nomlmmua tacm " sums vsusunmamavs Masosnesm ae\emsuoue we n.nv ee:a0o Nsossesmumazcs ssu Eouw pscmsuno sus: caonm muaamsm .Asm .as us usmuaq mo voguse snu an ushsmms as: >ua>muos Hueze .ewe use stuom svmcousosa docsneouumehm saoee a suesssuesu zua>muos mo awe: as m «nu ma mau u cusses umz m.a za amenaaua 29mm umuuzewmumaum< coausmauause eum>muo< Awev esum lewMV‘ Huuoh uesusee< ommmosem ewwwoun kuoP. acmusommmuee .mzzaqou mdmo Aduezmbcmm UZHm: me<¢9mwzm m4 JozmmeomHHZLN.mna<3OH VHH>HHU< mm<¢mmmzNuus smsuswsesuuaeeousozaw lea: uom usessms was n\He Na «0 susu Boam s us vsuosaaos susa Asn=u\HeNv secuuosum .AIIV uesfiwsuw HUN z no.0Io usseNH s mo coauoavouuew snu suowsn eeeaoo snu sweouSu vsmmse mm: 4 usmmsn no He ooa efisusefixoueee< .svusoosawamuso Noo.o cu vsusunaafiacs fiasom x aomm.av cesaoo asssnesmlmswa s cu wsNHees was .scqmooaawahuoo nos.m mauauaucou uouaoeuw NON sues Nae umusuue suss casuoue aseomouswe usuaaansaom no we vsupesn 039 .mnHmOUDAUAVBUO Noe.o .o.w me H< NHH>HHU< mm g 8 a? e5 1 .5 ......... o" 8 ‘ .3 ... ... .5. 9° d 8 1.9de r" [KCI]I(M) o {a .3 93 d M ‘9 Protein (mg/ml) 67 .:svonusz= uses: vsnwusmsv as.AOv :Nsuoue .on HocsneouuwaLm.mvus30u huu>wuom ssauswsesuueaeoueoaawlenb uom vsesmmm was .:\He ON mo susu 30am s us usuosHHos sus3 Aspeu\ae N.Ov meowussum .Allv uesNOsuw How 2 mO.O I O unscaa s «o eoNusavouueH snu suousn eesaos ssu :wsouzu Osmsse as: < uswmen mo He Om efisusewxoueed .svamoseaweuoo qu.O weaeasueoo A>\>v Housseaw NON sues Nua Osueafiw sus3 casuoue anacsouoae OsNNHNASHos mo we mumam .MOHmOUDAUAMHUO Nm0.0 .O.w me H< »HH>HHU< mmaacs snu eoum Osewsuno sus3 :30:s suasmsx .scusooaawaeuso NmO.O cu ususunaaueus ass AO.w :ev eesaos Hsosnesmlmuuos Hueze .sueewe use useuow sONeou=s=HwHoes£eouu«GLN.sHoe: H muesmsuesu euu>fiuss mo awe: a s Na wee 0.0 OON m.~ sumaas How a On N.m OOa m.O new: cesaoo usuagasmumuuo< aoeuaoueuuaa euu>uuu< Amav esum vase» Asuoe uesusee< oawuosem easuoue Asuoe eoNusstHuse .mH<¢Hmm:w m< JozxmeOMHHztm.mam<3OH >9H>HHU< mm<¢memz<¢HA>zoxboDAUIeQO A<2H8mmHzH AA<2m HHmmM<> mo oneozsm < m< MHNuss sassusmmesuuHmcousosawleab mo eofiusefieususv susu HsNuHeN eo Osman we unwoe comm .mn: mo mZOHHM¢> mo onHUZDh < m< meauos Hoeze say .eouus>ausseu o: weu>s£ ms Osvuswsu sus3 .seouussuw vsaooe Osueawves smsnu .soesuswsu mo ueaoe s s< .svwmossawaeuoo aseouufivvs o: weuefisueos .mcoNuomum usHooe vsusaave: mo eufi>aus HOeze ssu sues vsuseeos as: euN>Nuos HOeze s59 .ewsuoue mo seowusuucsseoo wewhus> ou .svamooaawaeuoo o: weaefisueos uswmsn eeeaos nuaa Osusauv sus3 pugs: .eesaoo Hsosnesmlm :N svumooeawamuoo .OHH9H>HHU< mmzoxsUDAUImOD m0 ZOHH<>HHU¢ZH mzh .¢~ suswfie 76 .10 \ 100 80 8 3 8 ° 00113499901 1.9de % ProtelnlOclylgluooslde (w/w) 77 When the protein to octylglucoside ratio of the pool of the KCl eluate from the DEAE column was increased two fold by ultrafiltration the solution became turbid. After centrifugation at 150,000 x g for 1 1/2 hours, the pellet had 37% of the original PNPGT activity while the supernatant had 7% of the original activity. The pool of KCl eluate from the DEAE column could be diluted with equilibration buffer with no octylglucoside, without apparent turbidity or an apparent loss in PNPGT activity. Gel Electrophoresis: Figure 15 shows the polypeptides which were stained after the gel electorphoresis of various fractions from the purification procedures. The pattern produced from the supernatant of the solubilization process lacked two major bands which were in the patterns produced from the intesinal microsomes. Most of the polypeptide bands with molecular weights greater than 65,000 in the pattern from the intestinal microsomes were absent or not as darkly stained as those in the pattern produced from the supernatant. The pattern produced on the slab gel, from the pooled fractions of the DEAE column eluate had 5 major polypeptide bands. By comparison with standard proteins of known subunit molecular weight, these bands exhibited molecular weights estimated at 60,000, 55,000, 48,000 and 46,000, with a very broad band at 52,000. The pattern produced from the pooled fractions lacked most of the polypeptide bands with molecular weights greater than 65,000 present in the pattern from the intestinal microsomes. Polypeptide bands with estimated molecular weights of 60,000, 55,000 and 48,000 78 mmm.mm .3.: emeanas asuss scw>on mOOO.wn .3.= smsasuso mOOO.nn .3.: ssscswouvansv sunfisuaaw "OOO.n¢ .3.: smasnas>o "meuspcsun unwwsa usasosaoz «vauouaumuauoo nom.o .m.m za assaoo asossesmlmma usm .esEomouoae us>m~ usu vsussuusue uzln .emm e