LIBR 4'2 4’: 17' MIchigan Basic University . 4 V p waxy/II 1 V OVERDUE FXNES: 25¢ per day par item RETURNING LIBRARY MATERIALS: -————________ Place in book return to mm charge from circulation recon CEPHALOSPORIUM LEAF STRIPE OF WHEAT: DECLINE AND MODE OF INFECTION By Jack Eugene Bailey A DISSERTATION Submitted to Michigan State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Department of Botany and Plant Pathology l980 ABSTRACT CEPHALOSPORIUM LEAF STRIPE OF WHEAT: DECLINE AND MODE OF INFECTION By Jack Eugene Bailey PART I: Decline of Cephalosporium leaf stripe A field previously reported to be exhibiting declining disease incidence was selected for this work and was studied in its eighth and ninth years of wheat monoculture. Three similar fields with O, 3 and 4 years of wheat monoculture were also studied. Soil was reciprocally transferred between these fields, and CephalOSporium gramineum soil populations as well as disease incidence were monitored. Both were low in the newest and oldest fields, and high in the fields of intermediate age. Addition of C, gramineum, as oat seed inoculum, increased disease in the newest and oldest fields only and resulted in an inverse relation- ship between the years of wheat monoculture and disease incidence. Results in the second year of testing were identical except that addi- tional inoculum produced uniformly high levels of disease in all four fields. In the second year, population levels were too variable to allow the substantially larger populations in the two fields of inter- mediate age to be statistically significant. There was no reduction in disease incidence from reciprocal transfers of soil. Fields supporting 4 or 5 years of wheat monoculture did not appear to show spontaneous disappearance of disease. It was concluded that the field with 9 years J. E. Bailey of continuous wheat is maintaining its decline status, but that disease decline may not result in other fields under continuous wheat monoculture. PART II: Mode of Infection Various methods of measuring the effect of root exudates on Cephalosporium gramineum were developed. It was found that exudates from frozen roots increased germination, growth, and conidiogenesis above that of non-frozen root exudate. Conidia held in a fungistatic condition, due to the influence of non-sterilized soil, were able to germinate and penetrate root tissue when exudate from roots that had been frozen was present. Hyphae were shown to grow deep into host root tissue. Various methods of freezing roots allowed 9, gramineum to colonize plants and cause symptom production. Evidence is presented that such roots were unbroken, thereby implicating an active penetration process. Roots held at low temperatures (2 C), but not frozen, did not become infected. An inexpensive and easy-to-use apparatus was designed to simulate field freezing. This freezer allowed non-vernalized plants to be frozen without crown death because only root tissue came into contact with frozen soil. Freezing and inoculating grain varieties with known resis- tances resulted in disease incidence similar to those found in the field. It is concluded that active penetration after freeze stress is an important means of infecting plants. Field observations tended to support this conclusion. To my wife, son, parents, and brothers ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank Dr. John Lockwood for his extremely valuable comments and hours of dedication in guiding my research and in the preparation of this manuscript. I would also like to thank Dr. Maurice Niese for his help in initiating this research on good, sound, scientific footing. Also, thanks go to Al Ravenscroft who answered endless questions and helped in this work in many ways. I very much appreciate the work done by Drs. D. w. Fulbright, G. R. Hooper, and J. M. Tiedje in serving on my committee and editing this manuscript. A very special thanks goes to my wife Becky. Her inspiration and understanding was of immeasurable importance to the success and completion of this dissertation. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page List of Tables ......................... vi List of Figures ........................ viii Literature Review ....................... 1 PART I---Decline of Cephalosporium Leaf Stripe ......... ll Introduction ......................... l2 Materials and Methods .................... l2 Field selection ...................... l2 Field maintenance ..................... l3 Planting ......................... l3 Inoculum preparation ................... 13 Monitoring Cephalosporium gramineum p0pulations ...... l3 Soil transfers and infestation . . . ........... 14 Disease rating ...................... 15 Results ........................... l5 Discussion .......................... 22 PART II-——Mode of Infection ................... 25 Introduction ......................... 26 Materials and Methods .................... 26 Fungus culture ...................... 26 Source of wheat seed ................... 27 Sterilization of seeds .................. 27 Media ........................... 27 Method for studying soil-imposed fungistasis ....... 28 Electron Microsc0py .................... 3l Artificial wheat freezing methods ............. 3l Cation exchange chromatography and bioassay procedures . . 32 Quantification of sugar in wheat root exudate ....... 38 iv Results ........................... The develOpment of a sterile agar disk method for studying Cephalosporium gramineum conidia and soil fungistasis . Nheat roots as a source of nutrition for Cephalosporium gramineum . . . .................... a) Effect of total wheat root contents on conidiogenesis. . . .............. b) Effect of exudates from non- injured wheat roots on conidial germination ............. c) Effect of exudates from wheat seedling roots subjected to freezing and mechanical injury on conidial germination ..... . ......... d) Root exudate fractionation ............ Disease incidence in relation to mechanical and freeze- induced injury. . . ............. . . . . . a) Mechanical severing of roots ........... ) Artificial freeze-induced injury ......... c) Natural freeze-induced injury . . ........ ) Cultivar screening procedures for resistance determination .................. Discussion .......................... List of References ....................... Page 38 38 43 43 45 47 52 59 59 64 67 68 76 Table 10. LIST OF TABLES Effect of number of years of continuous wheat on natural Cephalosporium gramineum p0pulations and infection caused by natural and oat seed inoculum of C, gramineum ...................... Effect of soil transfers between fields with different periods of wheat monoculture on populations of Cephalosporium gramineum ................. Effect of soil transfers between fields with different periods of wheat monoculture on disease caused by natural populations of Cephalosporium gramineum ...... Effect of soil transfers between fields with different periods of wheat monoculture on disease caused by natural populations of Cephalosporium gramineum supplemented with oat seed inoculum. . .......... Effect of period of wheat monoculture on natural Cephalosporium gramineum populations and on disease caused—by natural and supplemental inoculum of C, gramineum. . . ..... . ................ Effect of incorporating wheat soil from a field exhibiting Cephalosporium leaf stripe decline into a field not in disease decline, as measured by disease incidence and population levels .............. Germination of Cephalosporium gramineum conidia after 24 hr incubation on agar disks covering soil Germination of Cephalosporium gramineum conidia on agar disks covering soil after various incubation periods ...... . . . . . . .............. Numbers of Cephalosporium gramineum conidia produced on wheat root agar and water agar after 9 days incubation . . . . . . ..... . ............ Effect of exudate from wheat roots treated in various ways on conidial germination and growth of Cephalosporium gramineum on sterile depression slides .......... Vi Page l6 T7 18 19 20 Zl 42 44 46 49 Table ll. 12. l3. l4. l5. l6. l7. l8. Effect of fractionated exudate from frozen or non-frozen wheat roots on germination of Cephalosporium gramineum conidia ............ Response of Cephalosporium gramineum to exudates from frozen and non-frozen, axenically grown wheat roots ...................... Leaves colonized with Cephalosporium gramineum after cut wheat roots were either dipped in a conidial suspension or placed in soil infested with C, gramineum conidia ................... Effect of exposure of wheat plants growing in sand to freezing conditions on devel0pment of CephalOSporium leaf stripe symptoms .......... Effect of exposing wheat plants to various periods of winter conditions in relation to development of Cephalosporium leaf stripe symptoms .......... Evaluation of a modified chest freezer as a method to screen plants for Cephalosporium leaf stripe . . . . Effect of various concentrations of Cephalosporium gramineum conidia used as a root dip on wheat plants of known resistances after mechanical severing of their roots ...................... Comparison of active and passiVe infection processes ....................... vii Page 58 63 65 66 69 LIST OF FIGURES Figure Page l. Sterile chamber used to study soil-imposed fungistasis ....................... 3O 2. Chest freezer method of simulating freeze stress ..... 34 3. Soil temperature dynamics 2.5 cm from bottom center of cups containing a greenhouse mix undergoing freezing and thawing in the chest freezer ........ 36 4. Standard Optical density curve for various concentrations of glucose ................ 4O 5. Light and electron micrographs of Cephalosporium gramineum germination on agar covering soil and growth through wheat root tissue ............. Sl 6. Electron micrographs of Cephalosporium gramineum penetration into wheat root epidermis following freezing (-lO C) in syringes and l0 days' incubation with C, gramineum conidia ................ 54 7. Electron micrograph of Cephalgsporium gramineum growth over the surface of wheat root endodermal tissue (476 X) following freezing (-l0 C) in syringes and l0 days' incubation with C, gramineum conidia ......................... 56 viii LITERATURE REVIEW General In 1934 Nisikado gt_al,, described a new disease of wheat in Japan (57), caused by an undescribed species of Cephalosporium. Nisikado and Ikata named the fungus Cephalosporium gramineum N15. and Ika. and the disease CephalOSporium leaf stripe. Cephalosporium leaf stripe (CLS) has since been described in many grasses, including the genera Qagtylis, Avena, Bromus, Elymus, Secale, Hordeum, Triticum, Agrgpyron, and Arrhenatherum (8, 36). Cephalosporium leaf stripe is a serious problem in Japan (57), Europe (29, 75), and the United States (52, 55, 69, 79, 81). In the United States, Cephalosporium leaf stripe is of particular importance in Washington (7), Kansas (94), and Montana (53); in Montana it is the most important soil-borne disease of wheat (52). In 1966, CLS was observed in Michigan by N. A. Smith, R. P. Scheffer, and A. H. Ellingboe (79). In 1963, Bruehl showed that C, gramineum also formed a sporodochial stage on dead, infested wheat stubble in the field (9). Colonies of this fungus on agar were identical to those formed by C, gramineum and inoculation of wheat produced the symptoms of Cephalosporium leaf stripe. Bruehl identified the fungus as Hymenula cerealis Ellis and Everh. and stated that this name should have precedence over 9, gramineum (9). He did, however, recommend that Cephalosporium leaf stripe remain the name of the disease. Therefore, the causal organism has two imperfect names: Cephalosporium gramineum for its parasitic stage, and Hymenula cerealis for its saprophytic stage. To date, no perfect stage has been described for this fungus. For clarity, C, gramineum will be retained as the name of the fungus in this paper. Parasitic stage It is generally agreed that C, gramineum invades its hosts through the root system, (4, 8, 53, 56, 57, 62, 76). Once in the vascular tissue, systemic colonization of all vegetative portions of the plant occurs; however, the fungus is restricted to the xylem as long as the plant is alive (86). When introduced directly into root xylem, at room tempera- ture, the fungus moves through the crown into the lower leaf sheaths within 4-6 days (86). Stripe development begins approximately one week after (86), when long chlorotic bands extend the length of the leaves (7, 8, 57) encompassing darkened vascular bundles. Acropetal symptom develOpment follows an early senescence of lower leaves resulting in stunting, poorly filled or unfilled seed heads, and decreased flour quality (53, 55). Cephalosporium leaf stripe can result in a 70-80% yield reduction in severely infected plants (40, 67, 76). In 1938, Ikata and Kawai (38) showed that certain culture filtrates of C, gramineum stunted wheat seedlings, while others produced stripe symptoms which later became necrotic. Bruehl (8) suggested that symptom development was most likely a result of xylary plugging by mycelium and physiological disfunction due to toxic metabolites produced by the fungus. Spaulding et_al, (80) found that C, gramineum produces pectinases and cellulases, and were able to demonstrate pectinase activity in diseased but not healthy plants. They also found that diseased tissues had a lessened water content and attributed this to increased viscosity of the water and xylary plugging by a polysaccharide produced by the fungus. They felt that hyphae and pectin plugs in the xylem elements further inhibited water movement, since acropetal and lateral dye movement could not occur in stripe tissue. They concluded that such "vascular distress” may contribute to cellular dysfunction and death. Work by Pool and Sharp (61) supported this conclusion by showing that a polysaccharide produced by C, gramineum cultures restricted dye movement in the xylem. Wiese (86) suggested that a diffusable substance(s) and not pectin or hyphal plugging of the xylem was responsible for interveinal stripe development. He found that such occlusions followed rather than preceded lateral extension of leaf striping. Electron micrographs of infected vascular bundles showed an accumulation of an electron dense material surrounding conidia, which, after liberation, was found to line the walls of infected vessels. Wiese felt this may be visual evidence of the dif- fusable product responsible for the restriction of lateral water and/or nutrient movement. Kobayashi and Vi (41) identified a toxin from culture filtrates of Q, gramineum which caused symptoms much like those of naturally infected plants. This compound, Graminin A, was also found to have antibiotic pr0perties effective against some bacteria and fungi. Creatura (21) found that Graminin A caused stomates to open wider and respond more slowly to water potential changes than stomates not treated with this compound. This reSponse preceded stripe development and was more pro- nounced under conditions of water stress. She showeithat differences in stomatal activity were not a function of differences in the leaf water status. Her work indicates that a toxin, Graminin A, and not diffusable metabolites are responsible for the early pathogenesis. Saprophytic stage After plant scenescence, C, gramineum begins its Hymenula cerealis stage characterized by random saprophytic growth from the xylem and the colonization of cortical tissues. The hyphae emerge through openings (i.e. stomates) in the plant residues, and phialides form at hyphal tips (92). Rapid conidiogenesis along with mucopolysaccharide production results in a mass of tightly adhering phialospores (13, 15, 61, 92). Wiese and Ravenscroft (89) found these conidia to have a half-life of 0.5 to 2.5 weeks in moist field soil held at 25 C, or 26 weeks when held at 7 C. When colonized plant material was present the p0pu1ation was renewed as long as the integrity of the host material was maintained. For example, infested wheat straw on the soil surface was able to renew the colony forming units (probably conidia) in soil each fall and winter, for approximately three years. Such straw was less efficient with each succeeding year. Buried straw, however, was a source for population renewal for only one year. The population density of C, gramineum buried in infested straw was approximately 11-32% of the original p0pu1a- tion after 18 months (42). Pool and Sharp (62) observed survival for as long as 40 months in infested residue. Trichoderma spp. were predominant colonizers of degenerating C, gramineum-infested straw; however, C, gramineum can exclude Trichoderma and other fungi for at least 13 weeks (12). Thus, 9, gramineum is an effective substrate possessor (11, 12, 43). There is some evidence that antibiotic production may play a role in excluding other fungi from previously infested wheat straw (14). Effective substrate possession is not unusual among fungi and may be of particular importance to pathogens of weak saprophytic ability (12). Survival during the fall and winter until host infection occurs is, therefore, a function of Spore production and longevity as well as effective substrate possession. The develOpment of a selective medium (green wheat agar) in 1973 (88) allowed for the first time quantitative detection of C, gramineum prepagules in the soil. Wiese and Ravenscroft (89) showed that colony forming units in the field rose from near zero in July to a peak of approximately 100,000 colony forming units/g soil by mid-winter (November-January). This was followed by a decrease to near zero by May. They found that removal of plant residues or treatments which hastened residue decay greatly reduced detectable Q, gramineum popula- tions. Population levels were progressively lower when wheat residue was disked, plowed, or removed, respectively, from the field. Disease decline Soils are known to vary in their 'hOSpitality' to microorganisms. Chemical (l7, 18, 48), physical (19, 30, 65), and microbial (3, 18, 20, 47, 48, 49) factors all influence the success of a fungal species to establish and maintain its presence in the soil ecosystem. In the case of soil-borne pathogens, these factors can affect disease incidence and severity. It is well known that sterilized soil stimulates growth of introduced, weakly-pathogenic fungi. This usually results in an increase in disease severity, as compared with non-sterilized soils which are suppressive to such unchecked growth. Consequently, all soils exhibit biological control of disease, to a greater or lesser extent, when com- pared to sterilized soil. 0f more practical significance are those naturally occurring soil systems which are indistinguishable from fields with high disease incidence, yet suppress soil-borne diseases to economically acceptable levels. There are several good examples of soils which have evolved to a suppressive state (1, 5, 28, 31, 33, 34, 71, 72, 82, 84, 93). Once a field becomes infested with C, gramineum, continued wheat monoculture normally results in a build-up of Q, gramineum populations. Recently, Wiese and Ravenscroft (91) showed a long-term decrease in pathogen p0pulation and disease incidence with continued wheat mono- culture. This phenomenon was observed over an eight-year period and resulted in disease levels too low to be used for disease studies. Addition of infested straw, the naturally occurring source of inoculum, was ineffective in significantly changing the disease status of this field (Personal communication, A. V. Ravenscroft). Soils exhibiting a Spontaneous decrease in disease incidence with continued monoculture are sometimes referred to as 'decline' soils, and the disappearance of the disease may be called 'disease decline.‘ The most studied example of this phenomenon is take-all decline (TAD) of wheat. Gaeumannomyces graminis is the causal organism of take-all disease of wheat, a disease of great significance in temperate climates where wheat is intensively cultured (83, 87) particularly in the Pacific Northwest (18). As early as 1898, Roediger noted a decrease in infection in previously infested land (34). Glynne et al. in 1935 (25) observed that soil continually planted to wheat was not conducive to take-all. It wasn't until 1964 that Slope and Cox (34) obtained experimental evidence that there was a decline of take-all over time. In 1972, Pope showed a decrease in infectivity in soils which 12.5% 'decline' soil had been added (63). Pearson et a1. (60) showed that as little as 0.0001% (by wt.) of decline soil could decrease disease in non-decline soils. In the field, fumigation eliminated the decline factors, but it was reinstated by adding 1% (by wt.) suppressive soil (73). Attempts to link the suppressiveness to specific factors has so far met with only mixed success. Early work attributed TAD to the micro- biological status of the soil (34). Antagonistic microorganisms were thought to be responsible for decline since exposure to 60 C for 30 min., or chemical sterilants removed the decline factor (73). Vojinovic (34) found that populations of bacterial colonies and actinomycetes antagonistic to G, graminis increased after the decay of host tissue. This was particularly true for diseased host tissue. 9, graminis is known to respond tropically to wheat root exudates (69), increasing the effectiveness of a given inoculum concentration. Pope and Jackson showed that the efficiency of this response decreased in decline soils, as compared with non-decline soils (64). They attri- buted this to either a depletion of exudates due to increased microbial competition, or to 'signal jamming' by metabolites produced by a new rhizosphere population. 2099 and Jaggi (96) demonstrated an increase in numbers of bacteria and actinomycetes in soil supplemented with G, graminis hyphae. Sixty percent of the microorganisms isolated were antagonistic to g, graminis. Fluorescent Pseudomonas were suspected of being responsible for TAD since they : 1) are common in wheat rhizospheres (particularly in TAD soil) (51) and on the rhizoplane of g, graminis- 1esioned roots (20), 2) have the same cardinal temperature of inactivation as decline soil (20), 3) are as effective at reinstating decline conditions in bioassays (73) as known decline soil (20), and 4) are efficient antagonists of G, graminis on agar (68). Reduced virulence and viral infection of G, graminis were hypo- thesized as factors in decline. Cunningham suggested that less virulent strains of the pathogen were important in TAD (34). Lapierra et a1. (44) and Lemaire et a1. (45) found that g, graminis isolates from decline fields were infected with a virus causing reduced virulence and poor culturability. However, Rawlinson et a1. (66) in a follow-up study could not demonstrate causality between viral infection of g, graminis and virulence, sectoring, growth, or perithecia formation. Virus infec- tion is not now thought to be important in the establishment of hypovirulence (3, 66). Other explanations for TAD such as volatile, plaque-forming substances (74), saprobic/pathogenic population shifts (34), changes in the NH+4 -N:N0-3-N ratios (6), and cross protection by weakly- or non-pathogenic fungi (22, 95) have not received general acceptance. Cephalosporium leaf stripe decline has not been reported in any of the major wheat growing areas outside of Michigan, where wheat mono- culture is commonly practiced. Its only documented occurrence is at the Michigan State University farms in East Lansing, Michigan. Control No chemical means of controlling this disease are currently available; nor does chemical control appear likely in the near future, due to the low cash value of the cr0p and the intravascular nature of the fungus. Proper residue management (e.g., deep plowing) and crop rotation have proven to be quite effective in reducing C, gramineum populations. How- ever, in some states crop rotation is not economically feasible due to the limited number of cr0ps which can be grown. In addition to saving fuel and unnecessary machinery wear, wheat residues must be left on the surface of some soils to prevent excessive water loss and to prevent erosion. In lieu of residue management, resistance is the best potential method of controlling the disease. In Montana, where CLS is the most important soil-borne disease of wheat, over 1,000 lines have been screened for resistance, using artificially infested field plots (52). No immune varieties have been found, but various levels of resistance have been identified. Mode of infection and disease resistance Several papers have focused on the nature of resistance to CLS. Inoculation for these studies usually involves root severing followed by root dip, or direct injection of conidia via a hypodermic needle into the stem (8, 39, 40, 54, 56). This circumvention of extra-xylary tissues is thought to mimic the natural infection process since it is generally agreed that C, gramineum is incapable of direct penetration of roots and that wounding is first necessary. Although root feeding wireworms have been shown to effect such injury, Spring heaving due to diurnal freezing and thawing is regarded as the single most important source of wounding. Spring wheat, although susceptible, is virtually disease free, even in infested fields. Likewise, susceptible wheat grown under greenhouse conditions in infested soil rarely becomes infected unless roots are mechanically severed and drenched with a conidial suspension. That the predisposition factor occurs during winter field conditions was shown by Bruehl in 1957 (8). After germinating wheat seeds on cultures of g, gramineum and planting them outdoors in the fall, 100% infection 10 resulted by the following spring. Only 6% of the plants became infected when grown in the greenhouse. Early fall planting and fertilization have been shown to increase the size of the root systems and, consequently, the number of roots broken per plant due to heaving (10, 62). Such treatment increased the level of Cephalosporium leaf stripe when rated the following summer (62). More recently, it was observed that the earlier wheat was sown, the more disease occurred up to a point, after which disease incidence began to decrease (90). Mathre and Johnson (54) were unable to demonstrate active growth by C, gramineum from soil to newly cut or crushed roots which presumably simulated naturally occurring heaving damage. To explain the mode of fungal entry from the soil into the xylem, they proposed that conidia were 'vacuumed up' by mass flow with water as it entered the broken xylem elements. Resistance, therefore, would be an intra- xylary phenomenon. Morton and Mathre (56) identified three types of resistance to CLS: 1) a reduction in the number of diseased plants in a ponulation, 2) a reduction in the number of diseased tillers within a plant, 3) a reduction in the rate and severity of disease development within a plant. The latter two responses have been observed in only one wheat cultivar. PART I: DECLINE OF CEPHALOSPORIUM LEAF STRIPE 11 12 INTRODUCTION Cephalosporium leaf stripe, caused by the soil-borne fungus Cephalosporium gramineum, affects winter wheat in many of the wheat growing regions of the world including the United States (52, 55, 69, 79, 81). Among the commercial wheat cultivars, levels of resistance are insufficient to combat the disease and avoid yield losses. Cultural practices, however, can play a major role in the survival of C, gramineum in the soil. Recently, Wiese and Ravenscroft (91) reported that extended wheat monoculture may lead to a Cephalosporium leaf stripe 'decline'. During the latter part of their eight year study, C, gramineum popula- tions and leaf stripe symptoms decreased dramatically. Similar phenomena have been observed for take-all of wheat (25, 34, 35, 71, 93) and various other soil-borne fungal diseases (28, 31, 33, 72, 82, 84). The purpose of this study was to describe the relationship between leaf stripe incidence,_§. gramineum p0pulations, and years of continuous wheat production and to determine if disease suppression may be a transferable trait. MATERIALS AND METHODS Field selection Fields at Michigan State University, East Lansing, as previously described (91) with 0, 3, 4 and 8 years of continuous wheat production were used. Soybeans were previously grown in the 0 and 3-year-old wheat fields, oats in the 4-year-old field and corn in the 8-year-old field. I The wheat cultivars (Triticum aestivum L.) grown in each of the fields were Ionia, Genesee, or Yorkstar, all equally susceptible to Cephalosporium leaf stripe (91). 13 Field maintenance The pH of all soils was maintained between 6.0 and 6.8 as recommended by the Michigan State University Soil Testing Laboratory. No irrigation or pesticides were applied except for 2,4-dichloro—phenoxyacetic acid (2,4,-D) in the Spring to reduce broad—leaf weeds. Each autumn, preplant tillage operations included plowing the previous wheat stubble 20-25 cm deep with a fixed moldboard plow followed by a spring-tooth harrow. Planting Planting was done in October. The cultivar 'Genesee' was used exclusively. Seeds were planted 3.6 cm deep in 15.5 cm rows. Inoculum preparation Isolates of Cephalosporium gramineum Nis. & Ika. (=Hymenula cerealis Ellis & Everh.) from Montana (supplied by D. Mathre) and Michigan were used in the 1977-78 and 1978-79 field experiments, respectively. One hundred and fifty g of oat seeds were autoclaved in 100 ml water for 30 min. Ten m1 of a conidial suspension grown in liquid culture for 7 days were added to each jar. After shaking and incubation at room temperature for 1-2 months, the inoculum was allowed to dry at room temperature (53). Monitoring Cephalosporium gramineum_populations Soil samples were taken in all uninoculated plots during the winters of 1977-78 and 1978-79. Three samples, taken from the t0p 7.5 cm (3 in.) of soil from each plot, were mixed and assayed in the laboratory using wheat leaf agar (88). C, gramineum prOpagules/g soil were determined by adding approximately one to two 9 soil from the subsample mixture to one liter of water and shaking vigorously. One ml aliquots of this suspension 14 were pipetted onto each of two assay plates and the number of C, gramineum colonies determined after 4-7 days incubation at 22 C. These two values were averaged and adjusted to represent the number of prOpagules per dry g of soil. Soil transfers and infestation 1977-78 season A completely randomized, split block design was used in these experiments. Fields with 0, 3, 4 and 8 years of wheat were divided into 12, 1.2 x 6.1 m (4 x 20 ft) plots. Nine of these were amended with soil from the other fields and three plots remained unaltered. For example, field 0 had three plots amended with soil from field 3, three plots amended with soil from field 4, and three plots amended with field 8 soil. Fields 3, 4, and 8 were treated likewise. Soil was transferred at a rate of 1.3 x 102 kl/ha (95 liters/plot). If soil amendments did not change disease incidence or population levels from that in unamended plots, these data were combined to increase the number of replications for further analysis. One half of each plot was infested with C, gramineum grown on oat seed. Oat inoculum (4.7 g m row) was placed 3.6 cm deep between the rows using a Planet Junior hand planter 2 weeks after planting. 1978-79 season The same fields, now with l, 4, 5, and 9 years of continuous wheat, were used. All fields had 9, 1.2 x 6.1 m plots which were monitored for C, gramineum populations and rated for disease incidence. Half of 3 plots in each field had added oat seed inoculum. Soil transfers were made from field 9 to field 4 only at two rates; 1.3 x 102 and 3.9 x 102 15 kl/ha. Three plots of each transfer rate was rototilled about 20 cm deep, and half of each plot was infested with oat inoculum one week after planting (4.7 g/m row). This inoculum was placed directly over the furrow, on the soil surface, then covered with a thin layer of soil. Disease rating Disease incidence was assessed at anthesis and reported as percen- tage of plants with leaf stripes. One hundred plants were rated for each treatment. RESULTS In 1977-78, the natural C, gramineum population was significantly lower in field 8 than in fields 3 and 4, whereas field 0 was intermediate (Table 1). Leaf stripe caused by natural C, gramineum inoculum was correlated with the inoculum density (Table 1). When additional ino- culum was added (in the form of colonized oat seed), there was no increase in disease in fields 3 and 4; however, fields 8 and 0 showed marked disease increases. This apparently reflects a difference in the conduciveness to disease of these soils, since field 0, a field with a very low population of C, grgmjneum, exhibited the greatest amount of disease (Table 1). Natural C, gramineum populations were not affected by the introduced soils (Table 2), nor was the resultant disease incidence, either with or without supplemental oat seed inoculum (Tables 3 and 4). In the 1978-79 season population change in relation to years of wheat monoculture had too much variability to be significantly different though the same tendency to higher populations in fields 4 and 5 was seen (Table 5). However, in fields with only natural inoculum, disease 16 TABLE 1. Effect of number of years of continuous wheat on natural Cephalosporium gramineum populations and infection caused by natural and oat seed inoculum of C, gramineum. Plants showing stripe symptoms, %a . b Natural populationC . Natural plus oat Field (X 103/gdry 5011) Natural inoculum seed 1noculum 0 2.7 ab 9 a 33 d 3 10.2 b 15 bC 21 C 4 7.5 b 17 bC 18 be 8 1.0 a 6 a 13 b aMean of 12 replicates with 100 plants per replicate. Values followed by the same letter do not differ significantly (E_= 0.05). bThe field is represented by the number of years of wheat monoculture in that field. cMean of 6 soil bioassays made from each treatment between November 1977, and June 1978. Samples were taken from plots without supplemental inoculum. .mcwpcmFg we xmmz mco cwzpwz po_q zuwm mo mumwcsm mgp Lm>o x_cm>m nmxmc use mv_mwm pcmwawumc ow Locou Eoce vmccmwmcmep mm: FwOm m;\_x NOF x m._n .Amo.o ".00 >_pemdwcwem_m edccwe be: on emppdfi damm ago An umzo__04 can—cu comm c? mos—m> .0Nm_ mean use NmmF cmnEm>oz :mmzumn umpuancou mxmmmm xwm we cause 17 m 0.0 m 0.0 m m.m_ m 0.0 0 m N._ m F.N_ a 0.0m m 0.m v m m._ m «.0_ m 0.~ m m.N m m 0.0 m 0.: m N.¢ m 0._ 0 0 v m 0 mupmwm cocoa A_wom ate m\mo_ xv ecocpePzaoa _eezpez a .szmcwEwcm sarcoqmopmsmou yo mcowpm_:aoa :o mcappzoocoe poms: we muowcma ucmcmwewu ;u_3 mupmwe :mmzpmn mcmwmcmcp Fwom do uummwm .N 040<~ 18 .mcwpcm_q $0 xmmz mco :wcpwz popa :umm we mumwcsm mgp Lm>o >_:m>m Umxmc ncm mnmem pcquwumc op Lecou Eoce vmccmwmcmgu we: FVOm m;\Fx mop x m._n .305 u .0 328:2? Lm$cvu no: on cmpum_ oEmm mzp >5 ww20__oe cE:_ou :wmm cw mm:_m> .mumuwpqwc Lea muse—Q oo_ ;p_2 mmpmuw_amc mmcgp mo com: .mcowpm_:qog EsmCFEmLm .0 m:_cczuuo xFchzwm: ou man mm; mmmwmwom m e m w_ m m m m 0 m N m m_ m mm m mp e f as 02 mm m m w m m_ m m_ m w 0 0 ¢ m 0 mupmw$ cocoa mfildeopqexm mawcwm mew205m mucmFQ a .EzmcwEmcm Ezwcoamo_mcmm0 mo mcowumpsaoa Feczpm: ha ummzmo mmmmmwu co meapfiauocos poms; mo muowcwa ucmcmmwwu cpwz mupmwm :mozpmn mememcmcu pwom mo uuw$mm .m 040

o >_so>o uoxos use muFovw psowowoms op sosou Eoss uossoemsosp mo: Pwom os\_x mo_ x m.—o .390 u 5 3:82:85 at; so: 8 $32 oEom us“ an uozoFFoe sE:_oo sooo s? mo:_o> .opoow_oos sou mpso_o 00F sow; mopoowpoos mossy to soozo o m_ o 0_ o 0_ o RN 0 o NF o N_ o um o Pu u o m_ o om m cm o mm m o FF o u_ o mm o mm 0 0 u m 0 mupowe sosoo o0 .meoumemm omwspmlmsTZosm mpsoPs o .Eonoosw uoom poo sow; uopsoEopooom EsosTEosm sowsoowoposooo so msowpo_oooo Fosopos an uomooo omoomwu so osopP=oosos poms: so muowsoo psosommwu sow; mupoww soozpoo msowmsosp Fwom so powwow .u 04moz sommeo mums msowporoooo Poszpos mo mso09osw5sopmu mossp mo soozu .sowpooWFQos son mucopo cop sow; msowpoowFQos mossp to soozo .mswpso_o so sow: oso s_su?3 .A.sw 00 go ON so spoou o op sop—wuopos o sow: pops some ops? uoposoosoosw mo: From mspo .Am0.0 ".mv prsoowsvsme sowywu pos ou Lowboy oEom osp xo uozoFFos moopo>o o N.__ a mm o No os\_x N0_ x m.m o “.m— a mm o 00 os\_x No, x m._ o 0.0 o mm o 00 _wom Fosowuwuuo oz AFTom.xsu m\m0_ xv Eo_:oosw uomm Ezpooosw onm uossowmsosu sowoo_ooos opoo morn rusopoz (prosouoz so us3o5< u o& .mEopQEXm oarspm mswzosm muso_s o .m_o>o_ sowpo_:ooo uso mosmuwosw omoomwu xo uosomooa mo .os__oou omoomwu s? Hos u_ows o obs? osw_oou mowsum woop sowsoomoPosoou mswowowsxo uFowe o Eoss Pwom poms; mswuosoosoosw so uoomsu .0 msm

souso ssom mssso>oo mxmsu sumo so osussoo Eoosssosm sossoomosommou so sosuossssow .0 momsooo esp ssepsoo op uopmouue use; sass .0ssNooss sepse mxeu mossp use ososoo meeu mossp uopoospoo osoz mopeuoxo pooz .0 0s- so esopesooeop e 00 uooouss we: mmospm oNomss .mpseso pews: uosouses .szosm xpseospoome eoss uopoo—soo osoz mopeuoxuo .Amo. ".mv xspseossssmsm sesssu pos ou soppop maem esp so uozo—pos ssosoo soeo ss moose>e Aseme . Lopezv -1 o 00.0 e 0.0 e 0.00_ e 0._ -1 pospsou mpoos uommospm e 0.0 e 00.0 e 0.0 e _._ms e s.m 0e -oNoosslsoz oNomss 0 0.00s o 00.0 o 0.N e 0.000 e 0.0 0e Lops< eNooss e 0.0 0e sm.0 e 0.p e s._ms e 0._ sm ososom mpoos uommospm -oNomss mpe\0 xouss .oz E; o& sospessEsoo mxeu noosoom .mpso_e>s:oe sospwouoso .mososeso .mmsssesom .ome opeuoxm emoospe peseseoo pegs»: so zpmcaA peeps e,mpoos pews; szosm Aspeussmxe .soNoss1sos use soNoss Eoss mopeuoxo op EoossEesm Sassoomosessou so omsosmoz .N_ 0000 uezopsos sEosoo soeo ss moose> .mpsoessmoxo opeseoom mossp so mseoe esp use msmaeszn .uosoeos we; AesopesoQEop ssev 0 0.m_- ssps: ss\0 0.0 apepeesxossse pe esopesoQEop psosaee esp 0ssoouos >0 smNoss use; mpseps .sonEeso 0ssNooss esp opss mpseso esp 0ssoep0 ososoo pmou esussoo spsz uosososu use; mpoom .esussoo spsz 0sssososu ososon poa esp ss ssom esp ossoesses sosp .oue_0 soNes e spsz ssea poos\usem esp so w 0ssso>om >0 poo use: mpooze 0 00 o 00 0.0_. p00 o 00 0 es 0.m_- pooisoz e _0 u ms 0.0+ p30 1... e 0 . 0.0+ psoisoz sosmmosoxo Eopsezm pmsss op 0 .mo>em_ uopoossp 0o .osopeseQEos epsoEpeosp poom .0 esmssoo so sospsuue sopse mze0 .msopoezm ossspm seep Eossoomosessou so psoEoosm>ou so msospsusoo ossNeoss op usem ss 0sszos0 mpseso pews: so osomosxo so poossm .ep 000eos sopse Asso szooo se0 Asospesssmsesp o>spoe mossocosv gosm sous: moess oxep p.seo apnenoss asee om-op Amsstoss pessosuv 0ss>eoI Em—zx poos so use umso>om .oosepmsmos usoss. op uopesossoo Ms aspsoseoo< uossoo sospesooos xeoo 0ssmmeoeooso xspeELos .oNomss sespsss sopse wasp zse pe soooo se0 Asospessomsesp o>spoe ossooos pos moouv 3osm sous: moeps oxep se0 msee om-om 0ss~ooss usesaoNsss osspsm mosepmsmom sees soppe 00pm EzessEes .0 6p asemeespepes so>oo zosm op assmsospesoz Asosmmossxo Eopsexm op sospsmoomsuoso Eoss oespv uossoo psmpe0 sopoes sospsmosmsuoss psooo sospoossp m>Hmm<0 m>ps0< spams .mommoooss sospoosss o>smmeo use o>spoe so somsseseo0 .0— m0m