This is to certify that the thesis entitled The Effects of Training and Detraining on Fiber Splitting in the Soleus Muscle of the Albino Rat presented by Charles W. Beach has been accepted towards fulfillment of the requirements for Ph.D. degree in Physical Education Major professor My 5: I??? I)ate 0-7 639 L ._.--~ BEACH, C.W. 1; The effects of: training and de-? ‘training of f fiber splitting 1 ib rgw’mflowa THE EFFECTS OF TRAINING AND DETRAINING ON FIBER SPLITTING IN THE SOLEUS MUSCLE OF THE ALBINO RAT By Charles W. Beach A DISSERTATION Submitted to Michigan State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Department of Health, Physical Education, and Recreation 1978 ('7. //.QG...0.0:0..0n. 0580.00.00 .950: £002. 0.09. 5:2.» .050 o. E00204 >..0.0:0..0n. 0:03 000.94 :0... 0:95 2.0.200 8:000... .2032 35 .00.... 0.0005. 32 Statistical Procedures The proportion of fibers in the process of splitting, the pro- portion of split fibers, and the proportion of mature fibers were the dependent variables for the 3 one-way (l x 13) fixed-effects analyses of variance routine on the Michigan State University Control Data 6500 Computer (CDC 6500). The number of fibers in the process of splitting (SPLPRO), the number of split fibers (SPLFIB), and the number of mature fibers (MATFIB) were used to calculate the total number of fibers (TOTFIB): SPLPRO + SPLFIB + MATFIB = TOTFIB The proportion of fibers in the process of splitting (PRO) was calcu- lated by: SPLPRO/TOTFIB = PRO The proportion of split fibers (SPL) was calculated by: SPLFIB/TOTFIB = SPL The proportion of mature fibers (MAT) was calculated by: MATFIB/TOTFIB = MAT Planned Comparisons were used for a priori tests and were designed to evaluate differences between pairs of means (99). Duncan Multiple Range Tests (DMRT) were used for a posteriori tests and were designed to evaluate differences between pairs of means whenever a significant F-ratio was obtained (101). The 0.10 level of significance was established for all statistical analyses. CHAPTER IV RESULTS AND DISCUSSION The results of this study are presented in the following order: training data from the Controlled-Running Wheel (CRW) programs, data on the Pr0portion of Fibers in the Process of Splitting (PRO), data on the Proportion of Split Fibers (SPL), and data on the Proportion of Mature Fibers (MAT). The F-ratios and P-values for all effects are summarized in Appendix B and the raw data may be found in Appendix C. An overall discussion of the findings is presented at the end of this chapter. Training Results A criterion of 75 percent of expected meters (PEM) was set as the minimum acceptable performance level for both CRW training groups. The training results for the SHT group are shown in Figure 2. The data indicate that these animals maintained a PEM of approximately 80 during the later stages of training when running velocities of 90 and 99 m/min were required. A search of the literature has revealed no other programs for the training of laboratory rats which have incor- porated such high velocities. Percent shock-free time (PSF) values were approximately 85 to 90 during the more strenuous portions of the training program. These results show that the animals generally 33 34 .Emuwopa uuozm 3mm 0:: so» Aime. ms0005 000000x0 0:00:00 0:0 humm. 05w: 00:m-x00:m 0:00s00 xawmv :00: .N 0hsuwm 8 .r "W RIIIILTILPILTIEIITIAoILTISIIFfS+I®m .iSLJK 0 0. c 0. _ n. . v. _ n. _ m. _ .. _ o. _ 0 {—1 0 _ s _ 0 _ o _ v _ n _ u _ . 1— .5 225 8 E. 0.. no 00 an 00 n0 0' on On an ON 0. O. 9 >3 8.2 FFbPPLFLphpthbbthbbhbpbhbrlplhbhbhbhbPbbebbbbpbhbrLPininbhbhhbbbPthhbb-PbbphbbPHo ion 35 responded to the conditioned light stimuli rather than to the unconditioned shock stimuli. The training data for the Long program are presented in Figure 3. PEM values were approximately 85 for the last fourteen weeks of training. A running velocity of 35 m/min was required throughout this period. The PSF values were in the range of 80 to 85 during the last eleven weeks of training. These results indicate that the animals responded well to the training programs. PRO1 Results The final results of the proportion of fibers in the process of splitting (PRO) are shown in Table 4 and Figures 4 and 5. These results are summarized here in terms of a priori and a posteriori comparisons. A Priori Comparisons The 8-Week Short group had a significantly higher mean than the 0-Week, 8-Week Long, and l6-Week Short groups. The 8-Week Control group mean was significantly higher when compared to the 8-Week Long group. There were no other significant differences between a priori contrasts. (See Table 5.) A Posteriori Comparisons The 8-Week Short group mean was significantly higher than all other groups except 8-Week Control and 24-Week Long. Also the 8-Week Control group mean was significantly higher than the means of the 24-Week Short and all 32-Week groups. 1Proportion of Fibers in the Process of Splitting. 36 Hwy .4 . .Emuwop: wcoq 3:0 0:0 :00 Ame. 0:0005 00000ax0 0:00u0n 0:0 name. 05.0 00sm-x00:m 0:00u0m Afiwmc :00: .m ossuwu 0 on Li 0. «4.11..qu 7.53.42." 0. _ n. _ o. _ n. _ a. _ Z _ 0. _ o 1—4 0 _ .. _ 0 _ n _ o _ n _ u .1— .2!!! 00 n. 0.. no 00 3 00 av 00 on On 8 0a 0. 0. 0 501.05 PbbbePbebbbebhbb-hbhbbbbbhbhubb-pbhbthPerbethhhkpbpbbpbbhbthththbPLbbbHo a 18 37 mmcc. evoo. NNCD. Nmoo. 5—09. Nuoo. N—oo. ~_co. ouoo. coco. Nooo. mooo. ocoo. prmw zsuw 2&40N 2900. 2840— are hzmc— zsuw ZSUQN hrmvm hszn ZSANn ZSUNM 2:. v 5 Ex: £033.80 €3.38. <. hzmxzo. A 020230 234x30 A 234x30 230.30 A E0020 0.20 A $0.30 .00. v a. 000000:ou 00000: < zsqmm - 0=m~m - - zsu~m - u . ao.. v a. haze .00:00000:u0m 0mau0cou 000000000: <. zaavm - - - u .00. v a. 00:00000:m0w 00000:0u 00000: <0 hzmvw - u i l . zeuv~ - - - - - - 23.: - - - - - - - hzwog - - - - - - - - zucc— - - - - - - - - - s. . . . - . . . .e . .e 50.. c ¢ . - - l - - - 0 - zsuw . u u - - - u - r u .0 n are zsawm FIwNn ZSUNn Zang pzmvN zeuvm Zago~ h:w0_ zsueq zsgw hzmm 2800 x30 Iii N. Dzukk.amm no mmwuoun mzh z~ mumm~m no zouhxoaoan g.n.u”hrtEguhnlli 4 E "Mildlflhflhna ”Hg «P35 a" {lira-lull; 1‘4”! .w:0000_0w 00 000000: 0:0 :0 m0000. 00 :000.00000 0:0 000 0:00: 0:0 mo m0m~00:0u 0000000000 0 0:0 00000: <--.v ouamh 38 .0000000 0:0 20.0: :30:m 000000:00 000000 0 0:0 0000000 0:0 0>0:0 :30:m m0m000:00 #:2: :cH.v:. 0:00.mm:u_m :0m3 :0000000 x 0:0:0000 a: 0:000000m 00 00000:: 0:0 :0 00000: 00 000000000: 0:0 .00 :005 0:0 00 000000 0000:000 0:0 0:00: .0 000000 020 .570. A 020 {To 23 23-0 A 200 .570 20.. 23.0 A 020 .570 .570 A 020 22.0 0.0000 020.. 00020 4020200 02.2.5.0 00000.00 00000.00 00000.00 . 88. .. 0000 0. 00. 0. . 0. i 0000. m d i 0.00. w nl. nu “N 1 0000. .. 0000. ¢N0.oONn ow.0¢-n DQOVNNM oz...:...._am “.0 mmmooma ml... 2. mmwm... “.0 20....moaomn. 39 .0000m00 0:0 3000: 030:0 000000000 000000 0 0:0 0000u0m 0:0 0>0:0 030:0 000000000 0x2: 000.vav 0000000:M00 :00: uc0c0000 x 00000000 x: 00000000m 00 0000000 0:0 :0 000:0; 00 0000000000 0:0 000 0005 0:0 00 000000 00000000 000 00002 .m 000000 0:0 .570. A0:0 .570 23 ..3-0A200 .570 20.. ......-0A0:0 .570 $-0A0:0 .570 £03.00 083-00 0830. 02.3-0 0830 20.05.00 20.. 0:0 200 20.. 0:0 200 20.. 0:0 200 20.. 0:0 28 20.. 0:0 200 0000. J «000. N. N. - 0000. a “a nu d .. 0000. w 0.. AV “N 1 0000. L 0000. 0:0 20.. 200 20.. 200 0:0 200 20.. 0:0 0:0 200 20.. 20.. 0:0 200 02_._L._n_am 0.0 mmwooma 9...... Z. mmmmfi. 0.0 ZOCCOQOKQ Table S.--A priori contrasts as the differences between means. Differences Between Means A Priori Contrasts PRO SPL MAT OWK 8WKC¢N -.0031 .0009 .0010 OWK 8WKSHT -.0046@ .0116 .0163@ OWK 8WKLQN .0000 .0146@ .0145 8WKC¢N 8WKSHT -.0015 .0107 .0153@ 8WKCQN 8WKL¢N .0032@ .0137 .0134 8WKC¢N 16WKC¢N .0022 .0040 .0032 8WKSHT 8WKL¢N .0047@ .0030 .0019 8WKSHT 16WKSHT .0047@ .0037 .0085 8WKL¢N 16WKL¢N -.0006 .0154@ .0148 16WKC¢N 16WKSHT .0010 .0110 .0100 16WKC¢N 16WKL¢N .0004 .0023 .0019 16WKSHT 16WKL¢N -.0005 .0087 .0081 Significant at the .10 level. 41 SPL2 Results The final results of the proportion of split fibers (SPL) are shown in Table 6 and Figures 6 and 7. These results are summarized here in terms of a priori and a posteriori comparisons. A Priori Comparisons The 8—Week Long group mean was significantly higher than the means of the O-Week and 16-Week Long groups. There were no other differences between a priori contrasts. (See Table 5.) A Posteriori Comparisons The 8-Week Short, 8-Week Long, and 24-Week Control groups had significantly higher means than all 32-Week groups. Also the 16-Week Short mean was significantly higher than the 32-Week Control and 32—Week Long group means. MAT3 Results The final results of the proportion of mature fibers (MAT) are shown in Table 7 and Figures 8 and 9. Also the reciprocal of MAT final results are shown in Table 8 and Figures 10 and 11. The reciprocal figures were calculated by summing the PR¢ and SPL means and using the NAT standard errors of the mean. These results are summarized here in terms of a priori and a posteriori comparisons. However, for ease of comparison with the PR¢ and SPL results, these summaries are described in terms of the "MAT reciprocal." 2Proportion of Split Fibers. 3Proportion of Mature Fibers. 42 mnmo. m—mo. mmmo. wv~o. mn_o. wn—o. mo_o. ~0—o. vm_o. ammo. neoo. coco. wNOO. zsuvw 29am hzmw hzmou zsavN 260w 330 zsaou hzwvw zsuou firmwm ZSJNm zsu~n Ao_. v my haze .nummuucou “pompoumOA < Zagxnw v zsaxzoq zaaxzm v xzo Ron. v my mumwhucou whowum < Zagmm - hrmNn - - zaUNm - - - Ao_. v my hat: .oucauflumcumm umnuucou «newuoumom <. zsqvw - - - - Ac". v my eucaUMumcuwm umauucou “woman <0 hzmQN . a . - - zsuv~ - - - - - - 232 . - . - - - - h=m0~ - - - - u - - - zauo— c c c u - - w - - 234w . . . - - - - - - - hzmw - - - - - - - - - u - zsuw : u I - - - u a u o u - x30 zea~n hzmmm zsu~m zsgvm hxmvw ZQUVN zs;o_ hzmc_ zsue. zsgm hzmm zsu» x30 931““ ufllurll "l”‘hlhtvh “1‘1” “th “I. “E." I'IIIIFI" ..I‘ I1. "tutu... mamm~u P—qnm no zo_b¢0a01a h”f§lfi"“ufi“.fli I. ‘1 kn. 1 F. .l a... i. l "I .1411. .muoamu um_aw mo cowuuonoua oz» so» mcaos ozu mo mummuucou whomuoumoa a can «nodun <--.o o—puh 43 .m0csuwu ogu zo~oc :30:m mumauucoo “Mewhg a pan mousumm oz» o>osm czosm mummpucou vzzc nc~.vav “cmufimmzwwm cud: sawumth x wcficwmuu z: muonwu ufiflgm mo comupomoug vs» now save 0;» mo muchpo uuwpcaum was mama: .c opsmmu 204 3310 V 20433:? 20.. «talc V x3lo 950mm 020.. #195 Jomhzoo 02.2.3: 0. o O N» VN o. o 0 mm em 0. o o «n cu J oooo. Tune. 8. . HHI 8a., 1 00.0. 3.0. 86. d .20. . _ c . IE .86 HI no.0 .o. 33. w d 4 83. w u 9.3. O N 88., _D-MO. NNflO. J COMO. . . 59°. QQNOQNn agocNNm VNOOQNM mmwmfi. fink—m no 20..—EEO?“ 44 .mcczwmm oz» zoqon :30:m mummuucoo uo_pa a 0:0 mouzumm ocu o>osm :3o;m mummcucou hzzz McH.v;. ucauwuwcwflm :0“: ucwcwmha x cowunusv as muocdn um_aw mo coMaHOLOL; 0:0 com 0005 one mo accuse wumwcmum 0:0 made: .5 ouswmm 3.03 I NM 20... him 200 him 204 200 20... 3?..0 V 20.. 83!? 883-8 204 .50 200 200 20... him sooBIQ 20.— ...Im 28 him 20:. 200 20... xBIQ V 0.3!0 300% I m 0.003 I0 20:4130 20... film 200 20.. him 200 0 0000. J 00.0. d M. nu d . 000.0. w H. nu “N J 003. L 0000. 20... him 200 20.. .55 200 mmwmfi. .anm “.0 20..—ROAD?“ 45 Numm. vmmm. mmma. cvxm. ovwm. _~wm. m—wm. mama. cmnm. coho. whom. woom. mmcm. zeu~m ZSQNm hrmNM pzmvw 2&u0~ zsgcu 2:0 zsux zSJVN Fume. zsqw zeU0~ hzmw Ao—. v a. Hmmm .mumauuccu uuowuoumoa < Fwazw A zsuxzm hzmxzw A x30 Ao_. v a. mumauucou “Comma < za0~m - 50% u u ZSUNn - n - Ao_. v a. haze .oucaomumcmmw unauucou “00.000000 <. zaav~ - - - - Ao~. v a. eucaufluwcuwm amuuucou “00.00 <0 hzva . . . u - zauv~ - - u - - - zaaom . - . - u u - hrmo— . - - - - - - - 2300‘ c c . - u - - - - zanm . . c - c - - - - - hzww : u n - t - u u u n o zcum u u u u u - - - l u o . xzo zs;~n FImNm zsu~n Zang Ermvm zsuvm 2340— pzmom zsuc_ 284w pzmm zsuw x30 1" .W‘illl. I; I I l I I «lull- '1“ nun”... .1,er . ,l "trig mama—m muah<2 no zo~ha0a0ma sir” ulhtllfln hflh.‘ ‘uflufixdvfl Jpn” H H“ “.“hulh I In u!“ Eknrflahn ”Infin' . . l 1111.. HI. .muosmm 00:00: go :o_uuogoLn use you wanes 0:» we mummuucou Mquuoumo; a van «Leann <--.n 0.90% 46 him 3310 A 200 5:0 .moczumm 0:0 30:0: :30:0 000000000 00000; 0 0:0 000200» 0:0 0>o:0 030:0 000000000 +22: Fc_.va. acmummflcme :00: :0000030 x u:~:_0uu z: 000:0; 00:00: 00 00.000000; 0:0 :00 0005 0:0 00 000000 00000000 0:0 0:002 .55 0.330 A 0.31.0 @204 #675 Jog—.200 NM QN 0. O 0 Nn @N 0. Q 0 NM GM 0. O 2... A... ..... .0000. 02.0. J] .000. 0.00. 0.00. 0.00. _ J38. 000. 0000. 00. rHl rum—n...L Lr ,Nhamu Nm 0. O QN 0 NM QN O 0. 0 NM 0. O VN .w 002mm; maDOKO 02.2.4E H0000 . U 0000 . J 0050. 1 Doom. NOIlHOdOHd .. 00mm. l 0000 ._ mmwmfi. manhds. uO 20..—.moaoma i‘—_—#—- 47 .000:u_0 0:0 30~o: :3o:m mummuu:oo mpomua 0 0:0 m0::mmm 0:0 0>o:0 :3o:m mumagu:ou hzzs nc_.v:. 0:00:0m:umm :00: u:m:0000 x :owuausv x: 0:0:m: 00:00: 00 :odu:oao:: 0:0 :00 :005 0:0 mo 0:0000 00010000 0:0 0:002 .m ouswmn 0.003 I «m 204 him 200 200 20.. hIm hIm :BIm A 200 xglm :00? I VN 20.. him 200 hIm 20:. 200 :OOBIm. 20.. him 200 200 20.. him hIm xBIm A {SIG .303 I m 0.003 I O 20..—H230 ZOI. him 200 20... him 200 H0000. 1 4 00mm. 1 OOhm . comm . NOI lUOdOEd 00mm . L 0000.. 200 20.. hIm 20.. him 200 mmwmfi. mehd—z no ZO_hmOaOmQ 118 vvmo. ~mmo. nmmc. cons. NNNC. ccnc. —m—o. wn—c. oo—o. oo—c. mcoc. mvoo. wwoo. h:mw ZSUvN 28:0 hzmo— zsux Zang x20 ze—o— zsuo— hzmvw hzwmm zSANm zsu~n —o—. v a. haze .mummuucou —:o—:00000 < F:Wx3w v ZOszw hzmxzw v 230 —o—. v :— 0000:»:0u —00—00 < ZSJNM hzmmn I zsuwn - - 8:. v 5 0.2.. 60:85:30 0.3350 23083.. f 20.: I I I —0—. v 0. 00:0u—u—:u—m unauu:ou —:o—00 <0 hzmvw . I I zsqu I I I 230— I I I I hzmo— I I I I I 2800— . I I I I I 2540 I I I I I I I hzmw I I I I I I I 0 230» I I I I I I I 0 I 830 hzmmn ZSUNM zs:0m h:mw~ ZSUQN Zago— hzmo— zsuo— zs—w hrmm zsum xzo mama—m h—qmm no zo—hm000m0 cz< oz—hh—anm no mmuUOmn mzh z— mama—m no ZO—hzoaomm . gfifikfit E “v".h! “ Hag” I‘liu In,“ "an“ a: 1. “putriurtl .lllqh. I’M.» .MUA"! u 0 ”Lin.“ u. ,I L 0.1...” I. yuXIIIN Ful. as”. FIO‘h..fl H'."“.h.vgfi"£”hul£r .P U .mu0n—m u——:w mo :o—uuogoua "Bu...” 0:0 0:0 u:_00——:m 00 00000:: 0:: :— 0:0:—: 00 :0_0:o:o:: 0:0 :00 0:00: 0:0 00 0000:0:00 —:0—:0000: 0 0:0 —:0—:: 0:0 :3o:m 0000:0:oo haze —o—.v:v 0:00—u—:w—m :0—3 :0000030 x w:—:—000 z: 0:0:M; 0——:m 00 :o_0:omo:0 0:0 0:0 w:—000—0w mo 000000: 0:0 :— 000:—: 00 :00000000: 0:0 :00 :005 0:0 00 000000 0000:000 0:0 0:002 hzm xBIoV zoo sIo .50 83.0 V .570 020.. .596 Jomhzoo mm 00 0. m 0 mm 00 o. m o 0m 00 m. m o _ ill. ill 0000.1.llll. II! , '80] _IHll , , 0000. III! 00.0. .020. 00.0. ,.0.0., , 0.0.0., .0.0. W08 H II, .00 0000. 0000. , , _ 000 0000.. h H m cm 0 e. um m 0. o 0m 0m 90 o o 0. mm .0: 0000:: maaomm 02 . Zach I 0000. I 00.0. I. OONO . .. 0000.. I coco. NOIlEOd 08d mmmmi h_I_am “.0 20.hmoaoma 024 02_hh_n_am m0 mmwooma th Z. mmwmi no 20_hmOn_Omn_ A.w:0:_; 0:000: 00 :0:000:00; 0:0 00 .000000000 0:0 00 00:00 .mousumm 0:0 30:0: :30:0 0000:0000 mhomg: 0 1:0 mahzwmm 0:0 0>0:0 :30:m 000000:00 haze Ac~.vav 0:00:0«cwwm :00: 3:0:0000 0 :0000030 >: 000:0: 00.0¢ 00 000000000: 0:0 0:0 wcm000_nm we 00000:: 0:0 :0 000::0 00 :000000000 0:0 000 :005 0:0 00 m00000 0000:000 0:0 0:00: ._0 ousuflu 0:0 .570 v 200 .570 Em 03-0 v 03-0 .8270» 083.00 083-0. 083-0 0830 20.2000 20.. 50 200 20.. 0:0 200 23 50 200 20.. 0:0 28 20.. 0:0 200 0000. J 1 00.0. d “a nu d - 0000. m u nu N - 0000. L 0000. him 204 200 200 204 him #10 204 200 him 204 200 204 him 200 mmme .5406 to 20..—.moaoma 024 02:54am 0.0 mmmoomn. NI... 2_ mmwmi 0.0 29.5.8005 51 A Priori Comparisons The 8-Week Short group mean was significantly higher than the means of the O-Week and 8-Week Control groups. However, there were no other significant differences between a priori contrasts. (See Table 5.) A Posteriori Comparisons The 8-Week Short, 8-Week Long, and 24-Week Control groups had significantly higher means than all 32-Week groups. Also, the l6-Week Short mean was significantly higher than the 32-Week Control and 32-Week Long group means. Discussion In C¢N groups there was a non-significant increase in the number of fibers in the process of splitting at eight weeks (140 days of age). The number of fibers in the process of splitting decreased over the next twenty-four weeks (Figure 4). A similar, more exaggerated, statistically significant difference was observed in the SHT group at eight weeks. This group clearly exhibited greater numbers of fibers in the process of splitting. Only the 8-Week Control and 24-Week Long groups were not significantly different. Although the numbers of fibers in the process of splitting were quite small (<60/1000), there were signifi- cantly more fibers involved in splitting in the SHT program at eight weeks. Over the entire thirty-two weeks the pattern of response of the SHT groups was quite similar to that of the control groups. 52 However, the pattern of response of the LON groups was quite different from either the CON or SHT (Figure 4). It appears that during aerobic training there was suppression of the number of fibers in the process of splitting. However, these differences cannot be explained from current evidence. For the exercised animals the proportion of split fibers was an greatest at eight weeks (Figure 7). This was followed by a progressive a reduction in the numbers of split fibers, even though the animals continued to exercise for another eight weeks. Clearly, there was a reduction in the numbers of split fibers over time whether the animals ' continued to exercise or not and at the end of sixteen weeks of detraining very few split fibers were evident. On the basis of the sixteen-week and thirty-two-week values, a proportion of approximately .007 would have been expected in the 24-Week Control group. Therefore, the extremely high value (.0322) would appear to be due to chance. Overall, the data for the SHT and LON groups reflect more split fibers in the exercised animals than in the controls. With the excep- tion of the 24-Week Control group, every comparison indicates more split fibers in exercised animals. It has been postulated that fibers in the process of splitting are precursors to split fibers and that these in turn become mature fibers (45, 95, 104). Therefore, one would expect the results observed in the data on the pr0portion of fibers in the process of splitting to be reflected in the data on the proportion of split fibers. Except for the 24-Week Control group discussed earlier, this was true in the CON and SHT groups. Results of the LON groups, excepting for the 53 32-Week group, showed little consistency between the proportion of fibers in the process of splitting and those already split. These data were not readily interpretable. It would appear that either the process of splitting was delayed by the "aerobic" training or that the process occured much more rapidly in the LON animals, therefore fewer were observed. The prOportion of fibers in the process of splitting added to the proportion of fibers already split is shown in Figure 11. These values are the reciprocal of the proportion of mature fibers shown in Figure 9. There were more fibers splitting or split in the 8—Week Exercised animals. After eight weeks there was a relatively consistent decrease in the proportion of splitting and split fibers. Grossly, the statistical results support this position. The 8-Week Short were sig— nificantly greater than the O-Week and 8-Week Control and the 8-Week Short and 8-Week Long proportions were significantly greater than all 32-Week groups. Clearly, there is variability in the data as observed in the 24-Week Control group, but the trends are evident in the graphs and there is sufficient statistical evidence to support this position. No conclusions may be drawn from this study regarding the total numbers of muscle fibers in the soleus. Improved methods of fixing and sectioning are necessary to prevent shredding of tissue sections so that complete fiber counts can be made. CHAPTER V SUMMARY, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS Summary The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of detraining on the morphology of previously exercised soleus muscle in the adult male albino rat. In particular, the study was undertaken to determine the effects of detraining, or removal of training, on muscle fiber splitting. The experimental animals were subjected to either an endurance-running routine or a sprint-running routine. The training regimens used the Short and Long Controlled-Running Wheel programs previously reported from this laboratory (106). These programs attempted to stimulate either aerobic or anaerobic metabolic processes in the animals. Training began when the animals were 84 days of age and con- tinued for sixteen weeks. This was followed by detraining, in the form of sedentary living, over the next sixteen weeks. Beginning with zero-week, sacrifices were held at eight week intervals. In a block with the plantaris and gastrocnemius muscles, the soleus muscle was surgically removed from the right hind leg and quick frozen. Serial cross-sections were then cut and stained. For each animal the micro- scope slide of the soleus was projected and each muscle fiber was 54 SS categorized as a mature fiber, a split fiber, or a fiber in the process of splitting. Except for damaged or missing areas, all fibers were counted. The results showed that there was an aging effect in the pro- portion of splitting or split fibers. Also, there were more splitting or split fibers in the 8-Week-Exercised animals. After eight weeks there was a relatively consistent decrease in the prOportion of splitting or split fibers whether the animals continued to exercise or not. At the end of sixteen weeks of detraining, very few split fibers were evident. Conclusions 1. Greater proportions of splitting and split fibers are evident in trained animals. 2. The prOportion of split fibers that is evident at eight weeks of training decreases during the next eight weeks of training and through the detraining period. 3. There is an aging effect on the proportion of splitting and split fibers with the peak reached at about 140 days of age and a progressive decrease thereafter. Recommendations 1. The present study should be repeated with the use of absolute fiber counts instead of proportional counts. 2. The present study should be extended by reinstating the exer— cise program after a similar period of detraining. REFERENCES 10. 11. REFERENCES Barka, T. and P. Anderson. Histochemistry: Theory, Practice and Bibliography. New York: Harper and Row, 1963, p. 313. Barnard, J., V. R. Edgerton, T. Furukawa, and J. B. Peter. Histochemical, biochemical, and contractile properties of red, white, and intermediate fibers. Am. J. Physiol. 220:410, 1971. Binkhorst, R. A. The effect of training on some isometric con— traction characteristics of a fast muscle. Pflugers Arch. 309:193, 1969. Binkhorst, R. A. and J. A. Vos. Contraction characteristics of the m. plantaris of the rat. Pflugers Arch.ges Physiol. 296:346, 1967. Bintliff, S. and B. F. Walker. Radioautographic study of skeletal muscle regeneration. Am. J. Anat. 106:233, 1960. Burleigh, I. G. Observations on the number of nuclei within the fibers of some red and white muscles. J. Cell Sci. 23: 269, 1977. Carlo, J. W., S. R. Max, and D. H. Rifenberick. Oxidative meta- bolism of hypertrophic skeletal muscle in the rat. Exp. Neurol. 48:222, 1975. Carlson, B. M. The regeneration of entire muscles from minced fragments. In Mauro, A., S. A. Shafig, and A. T. Milhorat (Eds.) Regeneration of striated muscle and myogenesis. Amsterdam: Excerpta Medica, 1970, p. 25. Carlson, B. M. The regeneration of skeletal muscle--a review. Am. J. Anat. 137:119, 1973. Carrow, R. E., R. E. Brown, and W. D. Van Huss. Fiber sizes and capillary to fiber ratio in skeletal muscle of exercised rats. Anat. Rec. 159:33, 1967. Carrow, R. E., W. W. Heusner, and W. D. Van Huss. Exercise and the incidence of muscle fibre splitting. Brit. Ass. Sports Med. J. 7:39, 1973. 56 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 57 Chiakulas, J. J. and J. E. Pauly. A study of post-natal growth of skeletal muscle in the rat. Anat. Rec. 152:55, 1965. Close, R. I. Dynamic pr0perties of mammalian skeletal muscles. Physiol. Rev. 52:129, 1972. Denny~Brown, D. Experimental hypertrophy, regeneration and dege- neration. In Adams, R. D., L. M. Eaton, and G. M. Shy (Eds.) Neuromuscular Disorders. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins, Co., 1960, p. 146. Dubowitz, V. and M. Brooke. Muscle Biopsy: A Modern Approach. London: W. B. Saunders Company, 1973, p. 32. Edgerton, V. R. Morphology and histochemistry of the soleus muscle from normal and exercised rats. Am. J. Anat. 127: 81, 1970. Edgerton, V. R., R. J. Barnard, J. B. Peter, C. A. Gillespie, and D. R. Simpson. Overloaded skeletal muscles of a non human primate (galago senegalensis). Exp. Neurol. 37: 322, 1972. Edgerton, V. R., L. Gerchman, and R. Carrow. Histochemical changes in rat skeletal muscle after exercise. E p. Neurol. 24:110, 1969. Eliot, T. S., R. C. Wiggington, and K. B. Corbin. The number and size of muscle fibres in the rat soleus in relation to age, sex and exercise. Anat. Rec. 85:307, 1943. Enesco, M. and D. Puddy. Increase in the number of nuclei and weight in skeletal muscle of rats of various ages. Am. J. Anat. 114:235, 1964. Exner, G. U., H. W. Staudte, and D. Pette. Isometric training of rats--Effects upon fast and slow muscle and modifi- cation by an anabolic hormone (nandrolone decanoate) 1. Female rats. Pflugers Arch. 345:1, 1973. Exner, G. U., H. W. Staudte, and D. Pette. Isometric training of rats--Effects upon fast and slow muscle and modifica- tion by an anabolic hormone (nandrolone decanoate) II. Male rats. Pflugers Arch. 345:15, 1973. Faulkner, J. A., L. C. Maxwell, D. A. Brook, and D. A. Lieberman. Adaptation of guinea pig plantaris muscle fibers to endurance training. Am. J. Physiol. 221:291, 1971. 24. 25. 26. 27. 28. 29. 30. 31. 32. 33. 34. 35. 58 Faulkner, J. A., L. C. Maxwell, and D. A. Lieberman. Histochemi: cal characteristics of muscle fibers from trained and detrained guinea pigs. Am. J. Physiol. 222:836, 1972. Feug, T. P. and D. X. Lu. New lights on the phenomenon of tran- sient hypertr0phy in the denervated hemiadiaphragm of the rat. Scientia Sin. 14:1772, 1965. Gilliam, T. B. Specific Alterations in Motor Neuron Morphology and Nissl Substance Concentration in the Lower Lumbar SpinalSegments of the Albino Rat Following Selected Chronic Physical Activity, Ph.D. Dissertation, Michigan State University, 1973. Goldberg, A. L. Protein synthesis during work-induced growth of skeletal muscle. J. Cell Biol. 36:653, 1968. Goldberg, A. L. Work-induced growth of skeletal muscle in normal and hypophysectomized rats. Am. J. Physiol. 213:1193, 1967. Goldberg, A. L., J. D. Etlinger, D. F. Goldspink, and C. Jablecki. Mechanism of work-induced hypertrophy of skeletal muscle. Med. and Sci. in Sports. 7:248, 1975. Goldspink, G. Changes in striated muscle fibres during con- traction and growth with particular reference to myofibril splitting. J. Cell. Sci. 9:123, 1971. Goldspink, G. The combined effects of exercise and reduced food intake on skeletal muscle fibres. J. Cell. Comp. Physiol. 63:209, 1964. Goldspink, G. The proliferation of myofibrils during muscle fibre growth. J. Cell Sci. 6:593, 1970. Goldspink, G. and K. F. Howells. Work-induced hypertrophy in exercised normal muscles of different ages and the rever- sibility of hypertrophy after cessation of exercise. J. Physiol. 239:179, 1974. Gollnick, P. C., C. D. Ianuzzo, and D. W. King. Ultrastructural and enzyme changes in muscles with exercise. In Pernow, B. and B. Saltin (Eds.) Muscle Metabolism During_ Exercise. New York - London: Plenum Press, 1971, p. 69. Gonyea, W. J. and G. C. Ericson. An experimental model for the study of exercise-induced skeletal muscle hypertrophy. J. Appl. Physiol. 40:630, 1976. 36. 37. 38. 39. 40. 41. 42. 43. 44. 45. 46. 47. 48. 59 Gonyea, W., G. C. Ericson, and F. Bonde-Petersen. Skeletal muscle fiber splitting induced by weight-lifting exercise in cats. Acta Physiol. Scand. 99:105, 1977. Gordon, E. E., K. Kowalski, and M. Fritts. Adaptations of muscle to various exercises. J. A. M. A. 199:103, 1967. Gordon, E. E., K. Kowalski, and M. Fritts. Changes in rat muscle fiber with forceful exercises. Arch. Phys. Med. Guth, L. and H. Yellin. The dynamic nature of the so-called 'fiber types' of mammalian skeletal muscle. Exptl. Neurol. 31:277, 1971. Gutmann, E. and I. Hajek. Differential reaction of muscle to excessive use in compensatory hypertrophy and increased phasic activity. Physiol. Bohemos. 20:205, 1971. Gutmann, E., I. Hajek, and P. Hordky. Effect of excessive use on contraction and metabolic properties of cross-striated muscle. J. Physiol. 203:46P, 1969. Gutmann, E., I. Hajek, and V. Vitek. Compensatory hypertrophy of the latissimus dorsi posterior muscle induced by elimination of the latissimus dorsi anterior of the chicken. Physiol. Bohemos. 19:483, 1970. Gutmann, E., S. Schiaffino, and V. Hanzlikova. Mechanism of compensatory hypertrophy in skeletal muscle of the rat. Exp. Neurol. 31:451, 1971. Hall, Craggs, E. C. B. The longitudinal division of fibers in overloaded rat skeletal muscle. J. Anat. 107:459, 1970. Hall-Craggs, E. C. B. The significance of longitudinal fiber division in skeletal muscle. J. of Neurol. Sci. 15:27, 1972. Hall-Craggs, E. C. B. and C. A. Lawrence. Longitudinal fibre division in skeletal muscle: A light- and electronmicro- scopic study. 2: Zellforsch. 109:481, 1970. Ham, A. W. Histology. Philadelphia and Toronto: J. B. Lippincott Co., 1974. Hanzlikova, V., E. V. Mackova, and P. Hnik. Satellite cells of the rat soleus muscle in the process of compensatory hypertrophy combined with denervation. Cell Tiss. Res. 160:411, 1975. 49. 50. 51. 52. 53. S4. 55. 56. 57. 58. 59. 60. 61. 6O Hess, A. and S. Rosner. The satellite cell bud and myoblast in denervated mammalian muscle fibers. Am. J. Anat. 129:21, 1970. Hickson, R. C. Exercise-Induced Biochemical Alterations in Different Types of Skeletal Muscle. Ph.D. Dissertation, Michigan State University, 1974. Ho, Kwok-Wai. Histochemical and Histological Observations on Rat Myocardium FollowingExercise. Ph.D. Dissertation, Michigan State University, 1975. Holmes, R. and P. J. Rasch. Effect of exercise on number of myofibrils per fiber in sartorius muscle of the rat. Am. J. Physiol. 195:50, 1958. Ianuzzo, C. D., P. D. Gollnick, and R. B. Armstrong. Compensatory adaptations of skeletal muscle fiber types to a long-term functional overload. Life Sciences. 19:1517, 1976. Irwin, A. E. The Effects of Exercise and Detrainingpon the Stiff- ness of Bone. Ph.D. Dissertation, Michigan State Univer- sity, 1976. Isaacs, E. R., W. G. Bradley, and G. Henderson. Longitudinal fiber splitting in muscular dystrophy: A serial cinematographic study. J. Neurol., Neurosupg., and Psychiatry. 36:813, 1973. Jablecki, C., J. Dienstag, and S. Kaufman. [3H]inositol incor- poration into phosphatidyl-inositol in work-induced growth of rat muscle. Am. J. Physiol. 232:E324, 1977. James, N. T. Compensatory hypertrophy in the extensor digitorum longus muscle of the rat. J. Anat. 116:57, 1973. Jewel, P. A. and E. J. Zaimis. Changes at the neuromuscular junction of red and white muscle fibers in the cat induced by disuse atrophy and by hypertrophy. J. Physiol. 124: 429, 1954. Kugelberg, D. Adaptive transformation of rat soleus motor units during growth. J. Neurol. Sci. 27:269, 1976. Lesch, M., W. W. Parmley, M. Hamosh, S. Kaufman, and E. H. Sonnen- blick. Effects of acute hypertrophy on the contractile properties of skeletal muscle. Am. J. Physiol. 214:685, 1968. MacDonnachie, H. F., M. Enesco, and C. P. LeBlond. The mode of increase in the number of skeletal muscle nuclei in the postnatal rat. Am. J. Anat. 114:245, 1964. 62. 63. 64. 65. 66. 67. 68. 69. 70. 71. 72. 73. 74. 75. 61 Mackova, E. and P. Hnik. Compensatory muscle hypertrophy induced by tenotomy of synergists is not true working hyper- trophy. Physiol. Bohemos. 22:43, 1973. Mackova, E. and P. Hnik. 'Compensatory' muscle hypertrophy in the rat induced by tenotomy of synergistic muscles. Experientia. 27:1039, 1971. Mackova, E. V. and P. Hnik. Influence of age and sex on the development of muscle hypertrOphy. Physiol. Bohemos. 19:331, 1970. Mackova, E. and P. Hnik. Time course of compensatory hypertrOphy of slow and fast rat muscles in relation to age. Physiol. Bohemos. 21:9, 1972. Manual of Histologic and Special StainingTechniqpes of the Armed Forces Institute of Pathology. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Co., 1960, pp. 29, 126 and 132. Maxwell, L. C., J. A. Faulkner, and G. J. Hyatt. Estimation of fibers in guinea pig skeletal muscles. J. Appl. Physiol. 37:259, 1974. Maxwell, L. C., J. A. Faulkner, and D. A. Lieberman. Histo- chemical manifestations of age and endurance training in skeletal muscle fibers. Am. J. Physiol. 224:356, 1973. Morpurgo, B. Ueber activitats--hypertrophie der willsurlichen muskelin. Virchow's Arch. Path. Anat. 150:522, 1897. Moss, F. P. and C. P. LeBlond. Nature of dividing nucleii in skeletal muscle of growing rats. J. Cell Biol. 44:459, 1970. Moss, F. P. and C. P. LeBlond. Satellite cells as the source of nuclei in muscles of growing rats.- Anat. Rec. 170:421, 1971. Muir, A. R., A. H. M. Kanji and D. Allbrook. The structure of the satellite cells in skeletal muscle. J. Anat. 99:435, 1965. Muller, W. Isometric training of young rats--effects upon hind limb muscles. Cell Tiss. Res. 161:225, 1975. Muller, W. Temporal progress of muscle adaption to endurance training in hind limb muscles of young rats. Cell Tiss. Res. 156:61, 1974. Olson, C. B. and C. P. Swett. Speed of contraction of skeletal muscle. Arch. Neurol. 20:263, 1969. 76. 77. 78. 79. 80. 81. 82. 83. 84. 85. 86. 87. 88. 89. 62 Ontell, M. Evidence for myoblastic potential of satellite cells in denervated muscle. Cell Tiss. Res. 1602345, 1975. Padykula, H. A. and G. F. Gauthier. The ultrastructure of the neuromuscular junctions of mammalian red, white and intermediate skeletal muscle fibers. J. Cell Biol. 45:27, 1970. Reger, J. F. and A. 8. Craig. Studies on the fine structure of muscle fibers and associated satellite cells in hyper— trophic human deltoid muscle. Anat. Rec. 162:483, 1968. Reitsma, W. Formation of new capillaries in hypertrophic skeletal muscle. Angiology. 24:45, 1973. Reitsma, W. Skeletal muscle hypertrophy after heavy exercise in rats with surgically reduced muscle function. Am. J. Phys. Med. 48:237, 1969. Reitsma, W. Some structural changes in skeletal muscles of the rat after intensive training. Acta. Morph. Neerlando- Scand. 7:229, 1970. Reznik, M. Origin of myoblasts during skeletal muscle regenera- tion. Lab. Invest. 20:353, 1969. Romanul, F. C. A. Capillary supply and metabolism of muscle fibers. Arch. Neurol. 12:497, 1965. Rowe, R. W. D. The effect of hypertrOphy on the properties of skeletal muscle. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 28:1449, 1969. Rowe, R. W. D. and G. Goldspink. Muscle fiber growth in five different muscles in both sexes of mice. I. Normal mice. J. Anat. 104:519, 1969. Rowe, R. W. D. and G. Goldspink. Surgically induced hypertrophy in skeletal muscles of the laboratory mouse. Anat. Rec. 161:69, 1968. Roy, R. R. Specific Changes in a Histochemical Profile of Rat Hindlimb Muscle Induced by Two Exercise Regimens, Ph.D. Dissertation, Michigan State University, 1976. Roy, R. R. The Effects of Specific Exercise Regimens on the Morphology of the Left Soleus Nerve of the Male Albino Rat, M.A. Thesis, Michigan State University, 1973. Salmons, S. and G. Vrbova. The influence of activity on some contractile characteristics of mammalian fast and slow muscles. J. Physiol. 201:535, 1969. 90. 91. 92. 93. 94. 95. 96. 97. 98. 99. 100. 101. 102. 103. 63 Schiaffino, S. Hypertrophy of skeletal muscle induced by tendon shortening. Experientia. 30:1163, 1974. Schiaffino, S. and S. P. Bormioli. Adaptive changes in developing rat skeletal muscle in reSponse to functional overload. Exp. Neurol. 40:126, 1973. Schiaffino, S., S. P. Bormioli, and N. Aloisl. Cell proliferation in rat skeletal muscle during early stages of compensatory hypertrophy. Virchow's Arch. Abt. B. Zellpath. 11:268, 1972. Schiaffino, S. and V. Hanzlikova. On the mechanism of compensa- tory hypertrophy in skeletal muscles. Experientia. 26:152, 1970. Schiaffino, S., V. Hanzlikova, and S. Pierobon. Relations between structure and function in rat skeletal muscle fibers. J. Cell Biol. 47:107, 1970. Schmalbruch, H. Muscle fibre splitting and regeneration in diseased human muscle. Neur0path. and Appl. Neurobio. 2:3, 1976. Schultz, E. A study of satellite cells in denervated skeletal muscle. Anat. Rec. 178:459, 1974. Schwartz, M. 5., M. Sargent, and M. Swash. Longitudinal fibre splitting in neurogenic muscular disorders--its relation to the pathogenesis of 'myopathic' change. Brain. 99:617, 1976. Shafig, S. A., M. A. Gorycki, and A. Mauro. Mitosis during postnatal growth in skeletal and cardiac muscle of the rat. J. Anat. 103:135, 1968. Sokal, R. R. and F. J. Rohlf. Biometry. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman and Co., 1969, p. 226. Sola, O. M., D. L. Christensen, and A. W. Martin. Hypertrophy and hyperplasia of adult chicken anterior latissimus dorsi muscles following stretch with and without denervation. Exp. Neurol. 41:76, 1973. Steel, R. G. D. and J. H. Torrie. Principles and Procedures of Statistics. New York: McGraw Hill Book Co., 1960, p. 107. Stewart, D. M. Effect of age on the reSponse of four muscles of the rat to denervation. Am. J. Physiol. 324:1139, 1968. Van Huss, W. D. Specific responses to heavy exercise stress. Osteopathic Annals. 5:10, 1977. 104. 105. 106. 107. 64 Van Linge, B. The response of muscle to strenuous exercise. J. Bone Joint Surgery. 44B:711, 1972. Vrbova, G. The effect of motoneurone activity on the speed of contraction of striated muscle. J. Physiol. 169:513, 1963. Wells, R. L. and W. W. Heusner. A controlled-running wheel for small animals. Lab. Anim. Sci. 21:904, 1971. Yellin, H. Changes in fiber types of the hypertrophying dener- vated hemi-diaphragm. Exp. Neurol. 42:412, 1974. APPENDICES APPENDIX A TRAIN ING PROGRAMS APPENDIX A TRAINING PROGRAMS Standard Eight-Week, Short-Duration, High-Intensity Endurance Training Program for Postpubertal and Adult Male Rats in Controlled-Running Wheels Total Acc- Time Time Total eler- Work Repeti- Bet- of Total Work Day Day ation Time Rest tions No. ween Run Prog. Exp. Time of of Time (min: Time per of Bouts Shock Speed (min: Meters (sec) Wk. Wk. Tr. (sec) sec) (sec) Bout Bouts (min) (ma) (m/min) sec) TEM TWT O 4-T -2 3.0 40:00 10 1 l 5.0 0.0 27 40:00 --- —-— 5=F -1 3.0 40:00 10 l l 5.0 0.0 27 40:00 --- --- 1 1=M l 3.0 00 10 10 40 3 5.0 1.2 27 49:30 540 1200 2=T 2 3.0 00 10 10 4O 3 5.0 1.2 27 49:30 540 1200 3=W 3 3.0 00 10 10 4O 3 5.0 1.2 27 49:30 540 1200 4=T 4 2.5 00 10 10 40 3 5.0 1.2 36 49:30 720 1200 5:? 5 2.0 00 10 10 40 3 5.0 1.2 36 49:30 720 1200 2 l=M 6 1.5 00 10 10 28 4 5.0 1.2 45 51:40 840 1120 2=T 7 1.5 00 16 15 27 4 5.0 1.2 54 59:00 972 1080 3= 8 1.5 00 10 15 27 4 5.0 1.2 54 59:00 972 1080 4=T 9 1.5 00 10 15 27 4 5.0 1.2 54 59:00 972 1080 5a? 10 1.5 00 10 15 27 4 5.0 1.2 54 59:00 972 1080 3 1=M 11 1.5 00 10 15 27 4 5.0 1.2 54 59:00 972 1080 2=T 12 1.5 00 10 20 23 4 5.0 1.2 63 59:40 966 920 3=w 13 1.5 00 10 20 23 4 5.0 1.2 63 59:40 966 92 4=T 14 1.5 00 10 20 23 4 5.0 1.2 63 59:40 966 920 5s? 15 1.5 00 10 20 23 4 5.0 1.2 63 59:40 966 920 4 1=M 16 1.5 00 10 20 23 4 5.0 1.2 63 59:40 966 92C 2: 17 1.5 00‘ 10 25 20 4 5.0 L. 3 72 60 00 960 soc 3=w 18 1.5 00 10 25 20 4 5.0 1.. 72 60:00 960 8“? 4= 19 1.5 00 10 25 20 4 5.0 1.3 72 0:00 960 80: 5-F 20 1.5 00 10 25 20 4 5.0 1.C 72 60 00 960 800 5 1=M 21 1.5 00 10 25 20 4 5.0 1.C 72 60:00 960 800 2=T 22 1.5 00 10 30 16 4 5.0 1.0 81 55:40 864 642 3=W 23 1.5 00 10 30 16 4 5.0 1.0 81 55:40 864 640 4=T 24 1.5 00 10 3O 16 4 5.0 1.0 81 55:40 864 640 5:? 25 1.5 00 10 30 16 4 5.0 1.0 81 55:40 864 640 6 IBM 26 1.5 00 10 30 16 4 5.0 1.0 81 55:40 864 640 2=T 27 2.0 00 10 35 10 5 5.0 1.0 90 54:35 750 50C 3=W 28 2.0 00 10 35 10 5 5.0 1.0 90 54:35 750 500 4=T 29 2.0 00 10 35 10 5 5.0 1.0 90 54:35 750 500 S-F 30 2.0 00 10 35 10 5 5.0 1.0 90 54:35 750 500 7 l-M 31 2.0 00:10 35 10 5 5.0 1.0 90 54 35 750 500 2-T 32 2.0 00 10 35 7 8 2.5 1.0 90 54:50 840 560 3=W 33 2.0 00:10 35 7 8 2.5 1.0 90 54:50 840 560 4=T 34 2.0 00:10 35 7 8 2.5 1.0 90 54:50 840 560 5:? 35 2.0 00:10 35 7 8 2.5 1.0 90 54:50 840 560 8 l-M 36 2.0 00:10 35 7 8 2.5 1.0 90 54:50 840 560 2-T 37 2.0 00:10 40 6 8 2.5 1.0 99 52.10 792 480 3-w 38 2.0 00:10 40 6 8 2.5 1.0 99 52:10 792 480 4-T 39 2.0 00:10 40 6 8 2.5 1.0 99 52:10 792 480 S-F 40 2.0 00:10 40 6 8 2.5 1.0 99 52:10 792 480 This standard program was designed using male rats of the Sprague-Dawley strain. All animals were between 70 and 170 days-of-age at the beginning of the program. The duration and intensity of the program were established so that 75 per cent of all such animals should have PSF and PER scores of 75 or higher during the final two weeks. Alterations in the work time, number of bouts, or time between bouts can be used to affect changes in these values. Other strains or ages of animals could be expected to respond differently to the program. All animals should be exposed to a minimum of one week of voluntary running in a wheel prior to the start of the program. Failure to provide this adjustment period will impose a double learning situation on the animals and will seriously impair the effectiveness of the training programs. 65 66 Standard Eight-Week, Long-Duration, Low-Intensity Endurance Training Program for Postpubertal and Adult Male Rats in Controlled-Running Wheels Total Acc- Time Time Total eler- Work Repeti- Bet- of Total Work Day Day ation Time Rest tions No. ween Run Prog. Exp. Time of of Time (min: Time per of Bouts Shock Speed (min: Meters (sec) Wk. Wk. Tr. (sec) sec) (sec) Bout Bouts (min) (ma) (m/min) sec) TEN TWT O 4=T -2 3.0 40:00 10 l l 5.0 0.0 27 40:00 --— --- 5:? —1 3.0 40:00 10 l l 5.0 0.0 27 40:00 --- --— l 1=M l 3.0 00 10 10 40 3 5.0 1.2 27 49 30 S40 1200 2=T 2 3.0 00 10 10 4o 3 5.0 1.2 27 49 30 540 1200 3=w 3 3.0 00 10 10 40 3 5.0 1.2 27 49 30 540 1200 4= 4 2.5 00 2O 10 30 2 5.0 1.2 27 34 40 540 1200 5s? 5 2.5 00 3O 15 20 2 5.0 1.2 27 34:30 540 1200 2 1=M 6 2.0 00 4O 20 15 2 5.0 1.2 36 34:20 720 1200 2=T 7 2.0 00 50 25 12 2 5.0 1.2 36 34:10 720 1200 3=w 8 1.5 01 00 30 10 2 5.0 1.2 36 34:00 720 1200 4=T 9 1.5 02 30 60 4 2 5.0 1.2 36 31:00 720 1200 =F 10 1.0 02 3O 6O 4 2 5.0 1.2 36 31:00 720 1200 3 1=M 11 1.0 02:30 60 4 2 5.0 1.2 36 31:00 720 1200 2=T 12 1.0 05:00 0 l 5 2.5 1.2 36 35:00 900 1500 3=w 13 1.0 05:00 0 l 5 2.5 1.2 36 35:00 900 1500 4:? 14 1.0 05:00 O l 5 2.5 1.2 36 35:00 900 1500 5=F 15 1.0 05:00 0 1 5 2.5 1.2 36 35:00 900 1500 4 1=M 16 1.0 05:00 O 1 5 2.5 1.2 36 35:00 900 1500 2=T 17 1.0 07.30 0 l 4 2.5 1.0 36 37:30 1080 1800 3=w 16 1.0 07 ’C 0 l 4 2.5 1.0 36 37:30 1080 1800 4=T 19 1.0 07:3“ 0 1 4 2.5 1.0 36 37:30 1080 1800 5=F 20 1.0 07 30 0 l 4 2.5 1.0 36 37 30 1080 1800 5 i=M l 1.0 07:30 O l 4 2.5 1.0 36 37:30 1080 1800 2=T 22 1.0 07:30 0 1 5 2.5 1.0 36 47:30 1350 2250 3=W 23 1.0 07:30 0 1 5 2.5 1.0 36 47:30 1350 2250 4=T 24 1.0 07:30 O l 5 2.5 1.0 36 47:30 1350 225: 5:? 25 1.0 7:30 0 1 5 2.5 1.0 36 47:30 1350 2250 6 l=M 26 1.0 07:30 0 l S 2.5 1.0 36 47:30 1350 2250 2=T 27 1.0 10:00 0 l 4 2.5 1.0 36 47:30 1440 2400 3=W 28 1.0 10:00 O 1 4 2.5 1.0 36 47:30 1440 2400 4:? 29 1.0 10 00 0 1 4 2.5 1.0 36 47:30 1440 2400 5=F 30 1.0 10:00 0 1 4 2.5 1.0 36 47:30 1440 2400 7 1=M 31 1.0 10:00 0 l 4 2.5 1.0 36 47:30 1440 2400 2=T 32 1.0 10:00 0 l 5 2.5 1.0 36 60:00 1800 3000 3=W 33 1.0 10:00 O 1 5 2.5 1.0 36 60:00 1800 3000 4:7 34 1.0 10:00 O 1 5 2.5 1.0 36 60:00 1800 3000 5=F 35 1.0 10:00 0 l S 2.5 1.0 36 60:00 1800 3000 8 1=M 36 1.0 10:00 0 l 5 2.5 1.0 36 60:00 1800 3000 2=T 37 1.0 12:30 0 l 4 2.5 1.0 36 57:30 1800 3000 3=W 38 1.0 12:30 0 1 4 2.5 1.0 36 57:30 1800 3000 4=T 39 1.0 12:30 0 l 4 2.5 1.0 36 57:30 1800 3000 58? 40 1.0 12:30 O l 4 2.5 1.0 36 57:30 1800 3000 This standard program was designed using male rats of the Sprague-Dawley strain. All animals were between 70 and 170 days-of-age at the beginning of the program. The duration and intensity of the program were established so that 75 per cent of all such animals should have PF? and PER scores of 75 or higher during the final two weeks. Alterations in the rest time. repetitions per bout, number of bouts, or time between bouts can be used to affect changes in these values. Other strains or ages of animals could be expected to reSpond differently to the program. All animals should be exposed to a minimum of one week of voluntary running in a wheel priq; to the start of the program. Failure to provide this adjustment period will impose a double learning situation on the animals and will seriously impair the effectiveness of the training program. APPENDIX B ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE TABLES AND PLANNED COMPARISONS T-VALUES AND P-VALUES APPENDIX B ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE TABLES AND PLANNED COMPARISONS T-VALUES AND P-VALUES FOR THE PROPORTION OF MATURE FIBERS ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE TABLE Degrees Sums of of Mean Source Freedom Sguares Sguares F-Ratio F-Prob. Between Groups 12 .0057 .0005 1.921 .055 Within Groups 48 .0118 .0002 ' Total 60 .0175 PLANNED COMPARISONS Contrast T-Value T-Prob. OWK - 8WKCON .121 .904 OWK - 8WKSHT 1.926 .060 OWK - 8WKLON 1.616 .113 8WKCON - 8WKSHT 1.688 .098 8WKCON - 8WKLON 1.414 .164 8WKCON - 16WKCON - .340 .735 8WKSHT - 8WKLON - .196 .846 8WKSHT - 16WKSHT - .942 .351 8WKLON - 16WKLON —l.491 .142 16WKCON - 16WKSHT 1.051 .298 16WKCON - 16WKLON .187 .852 16WKSHT - 16WKLON - .856 .396 67 68 ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE TABLES AND PLANNED COMPARISONS T-VALUES AND P-VALUES FOR THE PROPORTION OF SPLIT FIBERS Source Between Groups Within Groups Total Contrast OWK - 8WKCON OWK - 8WKSHT OWK - 8WKLON 8WKCON - 8WKSHT 8WKCON - 8WKLON 8WKCON - 16WKCON 8WKSHT - 8WKLON 8WKSHT - 16WKSHT 8WKLON - 16WKLON 16WKCON - 16WKSHT 16WKCON - 16WKLON 16WKSHT - 16WKLON ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE TABLE Degrees of Freedom 12 48 60 Sums of Sguares .004 .009 .014 PLANNED COMPARISONS 7 7 4 Mean Squares F-Ratio .0004 .0002 T—Value -1. -1. -1 .116 504 .796 299 .588 .459 .349 .445 .704 .273 .256 .006 1.910 T-Prob. .908 .139 .079 .200 .119 .648 .728 .658 .095 .209 .799 .319 F-Prob. .057 69 ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE TABLES AND PLANNED COMPARISONS T-VALUES AND P-VALUES FOR THE PROPORTION OF FIBERS IN THE PROCESS OF SPLITTING Source Between Groups Within Groups Total Contrast OWK - 8WKCON OWK - 8WKSHT OWK — 8WKLON 8WKCON - 8WKSHT 8WKCON - 8WKLON 8WKCON - 16WKCON 8WKSHT - 8WKLON 8WKSHT - 16WKSHT 8WKLON - 16WKLON 16WKCON - 16WKSHT 16WKCON - 16WKLON 16WKSHT - 16WKLON Sums of Sguares .0002 .0004 .0005 ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE TABLE Mean Squares F—Ratio F-Prob. .0000 2.096 .035 .0000 PLANNED COMPARISONS T-Value -2. -3. .024 .963 .923 .314 .842 .976 .324 .605 .259 .334 NNHH 131 161 T-Prob. .380 .003 .981 .340 .060 .195 .007 .005 .747 .548 .797 .740 APPENDIX C BASIC DATA APPENDIX C BASIC DATA Fibers in Dura- the Process Split Mature Total Animal Treat- tion of Splitting Fibers Fibers Fibers Number ment (wk) (SPLFIB) (SPLFIB) (MATFIB) (TOTFIB) 201 Control 00 000 008 2094 2102 202 Control 00 000 017 2743 2762 204 Control 00 002 019 2654 2675 205 Control 00 011 154 2668 2833 207 Control 00 011 113 2659 2783 210 Control 00 003 013 2445 2461 211 Control 00 000 017 2010 2027 212 Control 00 000 029 3067 3096 89 Control 08 009 029 2119 2157 90 Control 08 022 095 2077 2194 91 Control 08 000 021 1705 1726 92 Control 08 000 027 1437 1464 94 Control 08 015 019 1590 1624 95 Control 08 006 017 2220 2243 6 Short 08 000 092 1930 2022 15 Short 08 017 032 1226 1275 19 Short 08 018 070 1585 1673 26 Short 08 006 032 2453 2494 27 Short 08 005 019 1050 1074 34 Short 08 010 069 2405 2484 48 Long 08 000 084 2310 2394 53 Long 08 002 139 2032 2173 57 Long 08 000 027 1142 1169 68 Long 08 005 039 1725 1769 85 Long 08 003 018 1347 1368 97 Control 16 000 046 1742 1788 98 Control 16 000 006 1611 1617 99 Control 16 005 012 1423 1440 100 Control 16 011 046 1414 1471 104 Control 16 000 000 1154 1154 70 71 Appendix C Cont'd. Fibers in Dura- the Process Split Mature Total Animal Treat- tion of Splitting Fibers Fibers Fibers Number ment (wk) (SPLFIB) (SPLFIB) (MATFIB) (TOTFIB) 2 Short 16 000 017 2208 2225 4 Short 16 001 021 2598 2620 14 Short 16 004 111 1914 2029 17 Short 16 000 043 1294 1337 33 Short 16 008 058 2617 2683 43 Short 16 005 067 2650 2722 47 Long 16 000 004 2230 2234 59 Long 16 002 057 1388 1447 64 Long 16 000 043 2475 2518 66 Long 16 001 019 2328 2348 67 Long 16 018 037 2548 2603 106 Control 24 002 064 1684 1750 107 Control 24 002 061 1737 1800 108 Control 24 002 067 2503 2572 9 Short 24 000 037 2172 2209 16 Short 24 000 007 1293 1300 29 Short 24 004 042 2445 2491 39 Short 24 002 062 2691 2755 80 Long 24 012 079 2324 2415 83 Long 24 001 008 2590 2599 109 Control 32 000 000 1094 1094 110 Control 32 000 000 1085 1085 111 Control 32 000 002 2035 2037 112 Control 32 000 027 2569 2596 13 Short 32 002 020 2890 2912 21 Short 32 000 019 2158 2177 30 Short 32 000 007 2145 2154 49 Long 32 000 010 2582 2592 54 Long 32 000 003 1920 1923 55 Long 32 001 009 1758 1768 71 Long 32 000 019 2620 2639 1|, :. MTIHFNEIIINNL NST ATE 1293 WI 0 I. 3 11111117"