ROLE OF THE CAROTID BODY _ CHEMORECEPTORS IN THE REFLEX REGULATION-0F THE ‘ CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEM Thesis for the Degree of Ph. D. MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY PAUL EDWIN PARKER 1972 LIBRARY Michigan Stan University This is to certify that the thesis entitled ROLE OF THE CAROTID BODY CHEMORECEPTORS IN THE REFLEX REGULATION OF THE CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEM presented by Paul Edwin Parker has been accepted towards fulfillment of the requirements for Ph.D. degree in Physiology Majo professor Date November 15. 197L 0-169 y am‘ome av 1‘ HMS & SUNS' 500K BINDERY INC. umm ORDERS 32mm”. gleam IIL: 4-54- ,... 2, II ABSTRACT ROLE OF THE CAROTID BODY CHEMORECEPTORS IN THE REFLEX REGULATION OF THE CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEM BY Paul Edwin Parker While the reSpiratory responses to carotid body chemo- receptor stimulation have been well defined, the cardiovascular responses have not been thoroughly investigated. The aim of this study was to determine the effects on canine forelimb, intestine, kidney and coronary vascular resistance of perfus- ing the isolated carotid bodies with hypoxic and/or hypercapnic blood. Perfusion of the carotid bodies and sinuses was provided by a circuit containing an extracorporeal lung taken from another dog. To change the O2 and CO2 content of the blood perfusing the carotid bodies, the isolated lung was ventilated with various 0 and CO gas mixtures in N Hypoxic-hyper- 2 2 2' capnia was produced by ventilation with a gas mixture contain— ing 0% 02 - 20% C02. Hypoxia alone was studied with 0% O2 - 5% C02. Hypercapnia alone was achieved with a mixture con— taining 20% 02 - 20% C02. The use of the carotid sinus perfusion circuit containing the isolated lung permitted V 1 9-." AF‘HHO -. g ‘ novel Vtoi‘nlv‘v" . v -‘O-Q.:.H ::.C.-au-e Coho-ti "23 “'61": ”(I .v. -t ' vi“. i=.:e s~~~’< j b: 5 "=::--- ' :Ibuu‘he lncre I, u :“9..‘ . "rm-5L1 n be : En re~ . .aroud b0“ ' Intestine ”5 ‘ran‘ I '.‘ V 1 . bills m“ H. “3:: . t‘ ' I tin resic 51¢. Paul Edwin Parker rapid changes in carotid sinus blood gas content without detectable changes in systemic blood gas concentrations. The forelimb, intestine, kidney and coronary vascular beds were perfused at constant blood flow to determine active changes in vessel caliber. The reflex responses to carotid chemoreceptor stimulation were studied before and following vegotomy. Systemic arterial pressure increased during hypoxic-hypercapnic chemoreceptor stimulation before vagotomy and increased after vagotomy during stimulation with hypoxia, hypoxic-hypercapnia and hyper- capnia. Carotid chemoreceptor stimulation with hypoxic- hypercapnic blood before vagotomy increased vascular resistance in the kidney but caused no change in resistance in the fore- limb, intestine or coronary vasculature. After vagotomy, hypoxic, hypoxic-hypercapnic and hypercapnic stimulation of the carotid bodies increased vascular resistance in the fore- limb, intestine and kidney but not in the heart. The skin and muscle vascular beds of the forelimb appeared to contri- bute about equally to the increase in forelimb resistance. Preliminary studies of the changes in vascular resistance in the gracilis muscle and hindpaw (skin) vasculature indicated a rise in resistance during hypoxic-hypercapnic chemoreceptor stimulation following vagotomy. Left ventricular contractile force decreased during chemoreceptor stimulation before and after vagotomy but a a In . ,. ..'..' VCR-'R*;:h m r. .uudvE —-.a.—-uu o a l'vvflw' 0 v ' C '1 , D D ‘ I lfivl‘iq “hp—llflvo .L.--‘ vet's-‘5- _._ H~A.--._ . --~-....- . nu , ' ‘ “Yp;_ "" “'\-- -u. - ‘ Il.:v- ”Sc/fivg " -¢-..,. ~‘GQbu \ .. ' . "*IA' 3““ d" :...e' 'V: u». u.. ‘ ' u .; 3‘34 r :“"v- T“‘--~‘ E -..,.‘ . A '5‘. .. "'51:“ to the i e~.,_' .‘.l'- ‘ I- .....g the pr‘ Paul Edwin Parker larger reduction in contractile force was observed following vagotomy. Heart rate was not consistently affected by carotid chemoreceptor stimulation either before or after vagotomy. The increase in vascular resistance observed in the kidney before vagotomy and in the forelimb, intestine and kidney after vagotomy appeared to be a sympathoadrenal mediated response to carotid body chemoreceptor stimulation. These studies indicate that hypoxia and hypercapnia act on the carotid chemoreceptors to elicit changes in autonomic outflow to the vasculature similar to changes induced by lowering the pressure in the carotid sinuses. 1‘. H . In R'v'uu _H ROLE OF THE CAROTID BODY CHEMORECEPTORS IN THE REFLEX REGULATION OF THE CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEM BY Paul Edwin Parker A THESIS Submitted to Michigan State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Department of Physiology 1972 q {I ,0?” DEDICATION TO MY WIFE AND PARENTS ii ’:~h~ “:5. ext 3: TIC. “fi-. ‘1. es“»a\ .15-.“ I. A; “A‘.‘~ets \l. .“ ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The author wishes to express his sincere appreciation to Drs. F. J. Haddy, J. B. Scott and J. M. Dabney for their encouragement and invaluable assistance during the course of these investigations. The author is also indebted to the other members of his guidance committee, Drs. W. D. Collings, J. B. Hook and R. M. Daugherty, Jr. for their advice and consultation. The author's gratitude is also extended to Mr. B. T. Swindall, Mrs. J. Johnston and Mr. G. W. Gamble whose technical assistance made this project possible. The author wishes to acknowledge his support by the NIH Cardiovascular Training Grant (HL 5873) during the course of his doctoral graduate program. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS Page INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . l SURVEY OF THE LITERATURE . . . . . . . . . . . . . U‘l Anatomy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Physiologic Stimuli . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Cardiovascular Reflexes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Selective chemoreceptor stimulation. . . . . . . Changes in systemic blood gas content. . . . . . l woooomm METHODS O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O I 16 Perfusion of Carotid Bodies . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 Forelimb. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 Intestine . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23 Kidney. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 Heart . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26 Gracilis—-Hindpaw . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28 Analysis of Samples and Treatment of Data . . . . . 30 RESULTS 0 o o I o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o 3.]. FOIGIiInb. o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o 3.1 Intestine o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o 41 Kidney. o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o 53 Heart . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 59 GraCiliS-—Hindpaw o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o e 93 DISCUSSION 0 o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o 102 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS 0 o o o o o o o o o o o o o o 0 1.1.5 BIBLIOGRAPHY o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o 0' o 118 APPENDICES A. RAW DATA 0 o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o 125 B. STATISTICAL METHODS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 155 iv " Average f: receptor : h'x'POJItic a: 0 Average fc rece'PT-OI' : hlpoXiC a} I AT'I'erage VV' intestine With hfi'po; and With I Average r. to caroti TABLE 1-la. 2‘23. LIST OF TABLES Average forelimb responses to carotid chemo— receptor stimulation by hypoxic—hypercapnic, hypoxic and hypercapnic blood before vagotomy. . Average forelimb responses to carotid chemo— receptor stimulation by hypoxic-hypercapnic, hypoxic and hypercapnic blood after vagotomy . . Average vascular responses of ileal segment of intestine to carotid chemoreceptor stimulation with hypoxic-hypercapnic blood before vagotomy and with hypoxic-hypercapnic, hypoxic and hyper- capnic blood after vagotomy. . . . . . . . . . . Average responses of superior mesenteric artery to carotid chemoreceptor stimulation with hypoxic-hypercapnic blood before vagotomy and with hypoxic-hypercapnic, hypoxic and hypercap- nic blood after vagotomy . . . . . . . . . .'. . Average kidney reSponse to carotid chemoreceptor stimulation with hypoxic-hypercapnic blood be- fore vagotomy and with hypoxic-hypercapnic, hypoxic and hypercapnic blood after vagotomy . . Average reSponses of isolated hindpaw and gracilis muscle to carotid chemoreceptor stimu- lation with hypoxic-hypercapnic blood before and after vagotomy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Average hindpaw response to carotid chemo- receptor stimulation hypoxic-hypercapnic blood before and after vagotomy. . . . . . . . . . . . Average hindpaw response to carotid chemo- receptor stimulation with hypoxic-hypercapnic blood before and after vagotomy. . . . . . . . . Page 32 34 44 54 55 94 98 99 L153 3 TABLES-- 9. Change in ileum, ic carotid cl' aft r var. LIST OF TABLES--Continued TABLE Page 9. Change in vascular resistance in forelimb, ileum, kidney and coronary vascular beds during carotid chemoreceptor stimulation before and after vagotomy. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 103 vi REFIESert carotid c h} PETS-3;: 32395.33. CirCtlrj I blocj I? REPIQSE: Carotid CaPn c t \8"? N ‘ I“ 936‘ '1 :71 T7 ‘JPErQ LIST OF FIGURES FIGURE 1. 2. 10. ll. Carotid sinus perfusion circuit. . . . . . . . . Representative forelimb vascular response to carotid chemoreceptor stimulation with hypoxic— hypercapnic blood in a vagotomized dog . . . . . Representative forelimb vascular response to carotid chemoreceptor stimulation with hypoxic blood in a vagotomized dog . . . . . . . . . . . Representative forelimb vascular reSponse to carotid chemoreceptor stimulation with hyper- capnic blood in a vagotomized dog. . . . . . . . Representative vascular response of ileal seg— ment to carotid chemoreceptor stimulation with hypoxic-hypercapnic blood in a vagotomized dog . Representative vascular response of ileal seg- ment to carotid chemoreceptor stimulation with hypoxic blood in a vagotomized dog . . . . . . . Representative vascular reSponse of ileal seg- ment to carotid chemoreceptor stimulation with hypercapnic blood in a vagotomized dog . . . . . Representative kidney response to carotid chemo- receptor stimulation with hypoxic-hypercapnic blood in a vagotomized dog . . . . . . . . . . . Representative kidney response to carotid chemo— receptor stimulation with hypoxic blood in a vagotomized dog. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Representative kidney response to carotid chemo- receptor stimulation with hypercapnic blood in a vagotomized dog. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Average coronary vascular response to carotid chemoreceptor stimulation with hypoxic—hypercap- nic blood before vagotomy. . . . . . . . . . . . vii Page 18 38 4O 43 47 50 52 58 61 63 66 .z' 3? FIGL R; 21. Average chencrec after \‘a ‘. EYEIa: e ' CT. IFS-re: after v; LIST or FICURES--Continued FIGURE 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. Average coronary vascular response to carotid chemoreceptor stimulation with hypoxic-hypercap- nic blood after vagotomy . . . . . . . . . . . . Average coronary vascular response to carotid chemoreceptor stimulation with hypoxic blood after vagotomy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Average coronary vascular response to carotid chemoreceptor stimulation with hypercapnic blood after vagotomy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Representative coronary vascular response to carotid chemoreceptor stimulation with hypoxic- hypercapnic blood in a vagotomized dog . . . . . Representative coronary vascular response to carotid chemoreceptor stimulation with hypoxic- hypercapnic blood in a vagotomized dog . . . . . Representative coronary vascular response to carotid chemoreceptor stimulation with hypercap- nic blood in a vagotomized dog . . . . . . . . . Average coronary vascular reSponse to carotid chemoreceptor stimulation with hypoxic-hypercap- nic blood after vagotomy . . .2. . . . . . . . . Average coronary vascular response to carotid chemoreceptor stimulation with hypoxic-hypercap— nic blood after vagotomy . . . . . . . . . . . . Average coronary vascular response to carotid chemoreceptor stimulation with hypoxic blood after vagotomy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Average coronary vascular response to carotid chemoreceptor stimulation with hypoxic blood after vagotomy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Average coronary vascular response to carotid chemoreceptor stimulation with hypercapnic blood after vagotomy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . viii Page 68 7O 73 75 78 81 83 85 88 90 92 uni-If“ “r- \ yen...» “Q... tic .F as \ I..- A" ..90 1" ..:.-- .9 o.-- LIST OF FIGURES--Continued FIGURE 23. 24. Page Representative responses of isolated hindpaw and gracilis muscle to carotid chemoreceptor stimulation with hypoxic-hypercapnic blood in a vagotomized dog. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 96 Representative hindpaw response to carotid chemo- receptor stimulation with hypoxic—hypercapnic blood before and after vagotomy. . . . . . . . . 101 ix INTRODUCTION It is well-established that the arterial chemoreceptors reflexly affect the respiratory system and some data are available which suggest that they also affect the cardio- vascular system (4). While the respiratory responses to carotid body stimulation have been well-defined (10,11), the cardiovascular responses have not been thoroughly investigated. The reasons for this study were threefold. First, few studies examining the reflex reSponses to carotid chemoreceptor stimulation employed selective stimulation of the carotid body. Most investigators reported the reSponses to systemic hypoxia. Second, of the few studies in which specific chemoreceptor stimulation was used, most were carried out employing pharma- cologic rather than physiologic stimuli. Third, little attention has been paid to the role of hypercapnic carotid chemoreceptor stimulation. The carotid body chemoreceptors are small, highly vascular bodies located near the bifurcation of the common carotid artery into the internal and external carotid branches. They are sensitive to changes in the PO , PCO and pH of the 2 2 arterial blood (4). Afferent nerve fibers from the carotid sinus and carotid body are carried in the carotid sinus nerve :1: ‘.~'.“ 0 wt: tie a —' -u L . ""r 1"”- -..v6 sunerva’l- ~o.. '.‘ ‘4' e “um“ .fi.--.L. . :31" .5” ‘O-vo cuU ' ':":"Hv ‘vu.h .V. 0 I “v Q“ ' I‘ve- - ult a.‘ ‘.\'.c In.- - FAA F ‘f‘ unu 53:03.. O... .530 umammmEJb umammmma . immom 9:th 33.150 ’ I I I 4 zmeoud - u «on. w e .. aroma / 923 A I I k rmmammuE E2; 215 o..-bm7ed vases and bodie ’~ lie chemorece: m ‘0 StUdY the 2:5. . uremb vascx; it. I. ~EP 'A D N” ~‘gg was Circ 0“ . ‘N '1?\ I menial art; ~'..L:Lb neIVes "I 21 All gas mixtures employed in the above studies were certified standard grade. The use of the extracorporeal lung circuit permitted rapid changes in local blood gas content without detectable changes in systemic blood gas content. Samplings of systemic arterial blood during ventilation of this isolated lung prep- aration with various hypoxic and hypercapnic gas mixtures showed no alteration of systemic blood P02, PCO2 of pH (64). As a check for chemoreceptor stimulation, the changes in respiratory movements produced by hypoxic-hypercapnic chemoreceptor stimulation before vagotomy were monitored by pneumograph or by observation. Increased respiratory move- ments during stimulation suggested that the surgical pro- cedures employed for isolation and perfusion of the carotid sinuses and bodies had not greatly affected the innervation of the chemoreceptors. Forelimb To study the reflex effects of carotid body stimulation cu1forelimb vascular resistance the innervated, collateral free forelimb of 13 dogs was perfused through the brachial artery at constant flow. The skin of the right forelimb of the dog was circumferentially sectioned 3-5 cm above the elbow. The huechial artery, the brachial and cephalic veins and the forfilimb nerves were isolated and the remaining muscles and ::r:.e::ive tissue mite right “5 .zszeasured lugt netrachial art-C” ::a:':ial artery a: racial and C91!er tar, radial and :ated with an ifu Taebrachial and 3-5 cz- above the taxi-lated with a 3211;. The outfl; resemir mainta; ~ (Sigmamotor £1335 to the am: Met ermined h LII 4‘ In E‘s” “‘“aat Ory Periq 22 connective tissue sectioned by electro-cautery. Following the administration of heparin, a blood Rump (Sigmamotor Inc., model T-6SH) was interposed between the right femoral artery and the right brachial artery. Forelimb perfusion pressure was measured just proximal to the point of cannulation of the brachial artery. Blood entered the limb only through the brachial artery and returned from the limb through the brachial and cephalic veins. The forelimb nerves (median, ulnar, radial and musculocutaneous) were left intact and were coated with an inert silicone solution to prevent drying. The brachial and cephalic veins were partially transected 3-5 cm above the elbow and the distal end of each vessel was cannulated with a short section of polyethylene tubing (P.E. 320). The outflow from both veins was directed into a reservoir maintained at constant volume with a variable speed pump (Sigmamotor Inc., T-6SH) which continuously returned blood to the animal via a cannulated jugular vein. Blood flow was determined by timed collections of the brachial and cep- halic venous outflows just prior to the termination of a ventilatory period. In the dog forelimb the median cubital ‘vein represents the major anastomotic channel between the brachial and cephalic veins. This vessel was ligated in all experiments so that the brachial venous flow was predominately fromlnmscle whereas cephalic flow was predominately from skin. ‘AlthCMgh this approach does not accomplish complete functional iSOl-a'tion of skin and muscle blood flows, the degree of aeration lS SUI. 1112325 in the tw :::;I::eal lung Wi‘! lie: the monitore' catalic vein out. Extermination ' sins perfusion c uzraccrporeal l; "T202 - 5% C02). 332) and hyperca; ieuonitored pral E‘-l:z.".ation the cl 5%! ieterminatior' tinted t0 the cor| L «Ed samplings ~. ‘3: . .9 bilaterally Stabiv' . ted wlth i 320.3% - I cording+ To Study th L. \‘y I-.1 \i, 23 separation is sufficient to permit comparison of resistance changes in the two parallel coupled beds (68). The experimental protocol was to ventilate the extra- corporeal lung with the control gas mixture (20% O - 5% C02). 2 When the monitored pressures had stabilized, brachial and cephalic vein outflows were measured and a blood sample for pH determination was drawn anaerobically from the carotid sinus perfusion circuit. After the initial control period the extracorporeal lung was ventilated randomly with the hypoxic (0% O - 5% C02), combined hypoxic-hypercapnic (0% O - 20% 2 2 C02) and hypercapnic (20% O2 - 20% C02) gas mixtures. When the monitored pressures had stabilized during chemoreceptor stimulation the outflows were again measured, blood was drawn for determination of pH and the extracorporeal lung was re- turned to the control gas mixture. Following stabilization during the control period, the blood flow measurements and blood samplings were repeated. At this point the animals were bilaterally vagotomized at the cervical level. Upon stabilization, the carotid chemoreceptors were again randomly stimulated with hypoxic, hypoxic-hypercapnic and hypercapnic blood according to the procedure described above. Intestine To study the reflex effects of carotid body chemoreceptor Stimulation on intestinal vascular resistance, an isolated 55.19:: of ileum '» a::::stant flow . zlength was ex:- :=.'e to minimize star; to this 55 4-4. single a: guided by cam-.. 93512? a blood 9 H.) between ti. 552m. PerquLI issued throuoh '4‘»: the output t, Section were lef. 33' n I L) 0" m :J rf H ’r J {D Q; r- F) —— i — — — —' 55 'd; h eKHQSed thr h: h .. are 24 segment of ileum was perfused through a mesenteric artery at constant flow in 9 animals. A section of ileum 15-20 cm in length was exteriorized through a midline incision. Taking care to minimize damage to extrinsic nerves, the single large artery to this section of ileum was dissected free, the col- laterals ligated and the mesentery cut on both sides of the section so that all arterial flow to the section was carried by this single artery. Blood flow to the isolated section was provided by cannulating the distal end of the artery, inter- posing a blood pump (Sigmamotor Inc., model TMlO, Middleport, N. Y.) between the right femoral artery and the artery to the segment. Perfusion pressure of the isolated section was measured through a 22 gauge needle tipped cannula inserted into the output tubing of the pump. The veins from the ileal section were left intact. Occlusive ligatures of heavy cord were placed at each end of the ileal section under study. An open tipped cannula was inserted into the saline filled lumen of the section to Monitor intraluminal pressure. After all operative procedures were completed the section of intestine was moistened with saline and covered with a sheet of celloPhane to prevent drying. A heat lamp was used to Inaintain the segment at near body temperature. In four animals the superior mesenteric artery was per- fused at constant blood 'flow. The superior mesenteric artery was exposed through a midline abdominal incision. The artery was <3arefully dissected free and cannulated distally with a .....‘.~ 1 .z....::S 8298; C- mesenter. . . ..c'. .v. “ a .I'“- ‘ . ‘ ‘~~A.Cr AnCOI '.-a.«.~>v b . ”awe was uni uvv~ bio. I :‘I v .“ 5' .s‘le prC'Cea-A ‘ "woo I i ' :v.‘ AIQ'are; k'l'h 3.. your». :fl‘; A . a .0'.‘ th nainta‘r‘a . ; :eot t" " . LVL filmed in this is exceptions 1: "1.313395 contain ilPZXlC- ypercapr listed before \' 753333 outflow. To study it Ezrenal vascul: :SIStant blood :' 35%" retr0peri': iii-hilly to VlS'- L1, ‘J‘Cd I. , -” mp (Sic; “he" the right "is perfUSIOn r“ 25 stainless steel cannula. Blood flow to the cannulated superior mesenteric artery was maintained constant by a pump (Sigmamotor Inc., model T-6SH). The venous outflow from the intestine was undisturbed. Following completion of all operative procedures the intestine was moistened with saline and covered with cellOphane to prevent drying. A heat lamp was used to maintain the area at near body temperature. Except for minor differences the experimental protocol followed in this study was the same as that for the forelimb. The exceptions in this study were: 1) the control gas mixture — 2% co employed contained 20% O 2) only the combined 2 hypoxic-hypercapnic (0% O 2, 2 - 20% C02) gas mixture was admin- istered before vagotomy, and 3) there were no measurements of venous outflow. Kidney To study the reflex effects of carotid body stimulation on renal vascular resistance the left kidney was perfused at constant blood flow in 10 animals. The left kidney was ex— Posed retrOperitoneally through a flank incision and retracted medially to visualize the renal artery. Following the admin- iStration of heparin the renal artery was cannulated and a -blood pump (Sigmamotor Inc., model T-6SH) was interposed be- tween the right femoral artery and the left renal artery. f”lee perfusion rate of the renal artery was initially set so as :grci‘xe a perf‘ 5:25 gressure as :a'siirey. The experirre: are as that for jrriac' the extra: :3pcxic-hypercagr. 1'31 gas. The a:. slated l ung wit axis gases. To study thfi. 3:. renal vascula: :9 was used. 2:9: ““59 the Out: fin" {if (“f I: n) (I) (D X T) O U) m ——’—— —— 26 to produce a perfusion pressure as close to aortic and carotid sinus pressure as possible while maintaining the viability of the kidney. The experimental protocol followed in this study was the same as that for the intestine. Following an initial control period the extracorporeal lung was ventilated with the hypoxic-hypercapnic gas mixture and then returned to the con- trol gas. The animals were then vagotomized and the procedure repeated after a control period by randomly ventilating the isolated lung with the hypoxic, hypoxic-hypercapnic and hyper- capnic gases. To study the reflex effects of carotid sinus hypotension on renal vascular resistance the kidney preparation employed above was used. Carotid sinus pressure was reduced by de- creasing the outflow resistance of the sinus perfusion circuit. Heart To study the reflex effects of carotid body stimulation (nicoronary vascular resistance the left common coronary artery was perfused at constant blood flow in 10 dogs. The heart was exposed through the left third intercostal Space and a suture was passed around the left common coronary artery at the junction of the artery with the aorta. The animal was heparinized and the input tubing to the pump (Sigmamotor Inc., moCiel T-GSH) inserted into the right femoral artery and filled enticed. A CU: site internal d: as attached to ti at: the left sub< agblood, the ca: aria into the mo ted in place. T axially set so tier-tic and car taining the viabi. ifthe coronary a tipped cannula i: hf: ventricular 52a111961199 arc: Tiarleston, s, C :1“ Contractil‘ mesIECtion o Ezi’erillental per Change in contra The eXperirl is the Same as tries of heart ii! 1 why dEViat; 'v “‘8‘ “hat gas 111* hiter 2h 1 €02 0r 5% or 27 with blood. A curved metal cannula of about the same diameter as the internal diameter of the left common coronary artery was attached to the output tubing of the pump and inserted into the left subclavian artery. While the pump was deliver- ing blood, the cannula tip was manipulated down the ascending aorta into the mouth of the left common coronary artery and tied in place. The perfusion rate of the coronary artery was initially set so as to produce a perfusion pressure as close to aortic and carotid sinus pressure as possible while main- taining the viability of the heart. The perfusion pressure of the coronary artery was measured with a 22 gauge needle tipped cannula inserted into the output tubing of the pump. Left ventricular contractile force was measured with a 120 ohm strain gauge arch (James L. Butterfield, P. O. Box 412, Charleston, 8. C.) sutured to the surface of the left ventri- cle. Contractile force was assessed by measuring (in mm) the pen deflection on the recorded tracing during the control and experimental periods. The data were reported as the percent change in contractile force during the experimental maneuvers. The experimental protocol followed in the heart studies was the same as that for the intestine and kidney. A second Series of heart studies was carried out in 6 animals in which the only deviations from the previously described protocol were that gas mixtures containing 10% O - 10% CO (hypoxic- 2 2 hYipercapnia), 20% O2 - 10% CO2 (hypercapnia) and 10% O2 - zfih CO or 5% O - 2%% CO (hypoxia) were substituted for the 2 2 2 A 2 ' III-man “5‘3“ 1121285- F." :0 further ‘3 s::.';1ation on r skeletal muscle ‘ E V1; A '6‘. ~~ali 3. ““ng with 1 are ligated. H' each end of the Theob turator ne h ”H ,:::.sed at cons .3432“ , anotor Inc 133 the gracili ‘35 initially s 33Xinately eqt The skin c “Yes Were 18 -.}Sr~‘ ~98 sect; 28 previously used 20% O2 - 20% CO2 and 0% O2 - 5% CO2 gas mixtures. Gracilis--Hindpaw To further delineate the reflex effects of carotid body stimulation on resistance to blood flow through skin and skeletal muscle an isolated skin, skeletal muscle preparation was employed. The right gracilis muscle was exposed and dis- sected free from connective tissue. All blood vessels com- municating with the gracilis except the major artery and vein were ligated. Heavy cord occlusive ligatures were placed at each end of the muscle to eliminate collateral blood flow. The obturator nerve remained intact. The gracilis muscle was perfused at constant flow by interposing a blood pump (Sigmamotor Inc., model TMlO) between the right femoral artery and the gracilis artery. The perfusion rate of the gracilis was initially set so as to produce a perfusion pressure ap— proximately equal to systemic and carotid sinus pressure. The skin of the right hindpaw was circumferentially sectioned 3-5 cm above the tarsus. The right cranial tibial artery, right superficial branch of the cranial tibial artery, Plantar and dorsal branches of the saphenous vein and hindpaw nerves were isolated and the remaining connective tissue and muscles sectioned by electro-cautery. The tibia and fibula Were cut and the ends of the marrow cavities packed with bone ax. Blood enter may and superf Tze hindpaw nerV-‘i fiular) were lei tray to prevent assistant flow rial T3410) whic. 2:st to a Y-cai the tibial arter ti tibial arter tantala inserted :15 Preparation iii muscle blood Reflex eff.I it‘i‘lied in 3 anil 29 wax. Blood entered the paw only through the cranial tibial artery and superficial branch of the cranial tibial artery. The hindpaw nerves (tibial, saphenous, superficial and deep fibular) were left intact and coated with an inert silicone spray to prevent drying. The tibial arteries were perfused at constant flow by a second blood pump (Sigmamotor Inc., model TMlO) which delivered blood from the right femoral artery to a Y-cannula which allowed simultaneous perfusion of the tibial arteries. The perfusion pressure of the gracilis and tibial arteries were measured via a 22 gauge needle tipped cannula inserted into the output tubing of the perfusion pumps. This preparation permitted almost complete separation of skin and muscle blood flow (68). Reflex effects of chemoreceptor stimulation in skin were studied in 3 animals. In these animals the skin of the right hindpaw was circumferentially sectioned 3-5 cm above the tarsus. The right cranial tibial artery and the superficial branch of the cranial tibial artery were isolated and perfused by means of the perfusion circuit described above. In these experiments the collateral flow to the paw was not disturbed. Finally, in 2 animals the skin of the paw remained in- tact and the right cranial tibial artery was isolated through a small longitudinal incision in the skin. The cranial tibial artery was then perfused by means of a blood pump (Sigmamotor Inc., Model TMlO) which diverted blood from the right femoral artery. The experire Stuiies was ident Theorotocol dif‘ assure and kid .32 "o ) and . ‘ 2 ‘ ares wer e used :s following V3: Anale N- The pH dete with an expanded Inc., model 22, ticns were made .s;.icates. P \ 4.435“. (69) ' 30 The experimental protocol followed in the hindlimb studies was identical for each of the 3 series of experiments. The protocol differed from that employed in the forelimb, intestine and kidney studies in that only the control (20% O 2 - 2%% C02) and hypoxic-hypercapnic (0% O — 20% C02) gas mix- 2 tures were used to ventilate the extracorporeal lung before the following vagotomy. Analysis of Samples and Treatment of Data The pH determinations from blood samples were measured with an expanded scale microelectrode pH meter (Radiometer Inc., model 22, COpenhagen, Denmark). Statistical evalua- tions were made using the Student t—test modified for paired replicates. P values less than 0.05 were considered sig— nificant (69). i'terial Pressu: in: With 0% 0 ' 2 he averag; the carotid Sir. ‘Io,P ' ,nic bio Significant inc: 3325 EXDer t s imEnt V .‘k‘n RESULTS Forelimb The average responses of the forelimb, systemic blood pressure and heart rate to perfusion of the isolated carotid sinus regions with hypoxic, hypoxic-hypercapnic and hypercap- nic blood before vagotomy are shown in Table l. The only significant response observed was an increase in systemic arterial pressure during ventilation of the extracorporeal lung with 0% O2 - 20% C02. The average responses of the forelimb to perfusion of the carotid sinuses with hypoxic, hypoxic-hypercapnic and hypercapnic blood following vagotomy are shown in Table 2. Significant increases in systemic arterial and brachial artery perfusion pressure occurred during ventilation with each experimental gas. Systemic arterial pressure increased to a greater extent (31%) during hypoxic-hypercapnia than during hypoxia alone (14%) or hypercapnia alone (15%). Brachial artery perfusion pressure also increased to a greater extent (18%) during hypoxic-hypercapnia than during hypoxia ' alone (9%) or hypercapnia alone (11%). There were no sig- nificant changes in brachail or cephalic vein outflows indi- catfiing that the changes in resistance were comparable in both 31 . Cfl:~\NE 0m fl 30H“ U004n xhwUHn HQflfiUQNn cam: oHOHUCOU " «U» owumh “Hum: n m: omuzm [23%; >LCJH3 HQ_£UQL2 i <2; .3L3meLQ QSCflm UHuOHQU H WUQ oQMZEQQHQ Nfiflhgwhm 1v fl—-.I...,d :\r: .t mu . o >...nqun.v~u-vv> heLAvnu..v.N ~9C0Hnu UHCfinfiquIHdvanxfl: munLHIv LVHIXGUHN> wk \hvw HkAW-Hfui— wawxh~fi I .09 1 UhnIUn nkfi—n - ”a a. 3 In FJIflrhcrL-L-Ih C.:.IU-!IU P‘vflt-hhvfifimerh £.: .~ NusmVINfith in}. push :95 c‘ Turn: '5‘ #--:h u. of. My.“ IOCIH-flwvw Abe I NI ENQSV-Ns ooscwucoo .OH I a .Amaoaum>nmmno caused you ammqu m.uamosumc mo.ov m. N N mes Hms ems HNH oo mON I o WON N.H h o H.N h a v.m h a N N mes «NH mNH FNH luv oo em I o WON N N mes MNH mmH NNH 00 em I 0 so o.m n mI e.N h s m.s a m N N n was mas NmH mNH “on 06 am I o wON N N was «NH HmH HNH oo wON I 0 so 0 N + HI mes m N + m mas m m +.mH mma NNH\ roe Noo am I No »ON .mm a .mm M 4m .mm a m mo nozbq omsaqomHV .mmaQ cam: mm .mmao new: a .mmao new: m m . mmsetz smoaaqHszm> .saEKHE mm M 30am oooan humans definomun one: .Houusoo u ADV .oumn undo: H mm .musm Imoum muouum Hmanomun u ems .ousmmoum macaw ofiuoumo u mom. .ousmmoum Hmwuouum oaswummm H mm .wsouomm> whommn cooHn oasmmonwmwn can Ufixomua .oasmmonoman Ioflxommn spa: coaumassflum Houmooouosmno cauonmo ou noncommwu nEmeuom omnum>¢ .H wanes . :“HE\NE O: In 3Oflu VOCHQ \AIHMWJHQ -HnmfiZUQHQ :10 I HOIHUCOU H «U» .mUOOHQ MUCH—mu “No new IIII -NIN anunvnv—au Ruin-fl: nJaIIaAvunvahU hwfld cafinflP-mvd NAJ "n .fiva~ o3AUHIu nufifl) MUHHIINMU-ANHVU .Ilu >.U..N 033W“ nhflIhv> n 111—74.. Nan .. >u—..- I >2~NJ o. :u9~> .-.,H...L Ivan nuavav ~ Q Ud-nha.-~U.va.~\fln~ mv-.... .IUHIUfiOAw\AI- \UN.~N~N-..u-fihflnw\fi- Ilpa u. x. u. as»... n~ d a 3 n.... «I oils - -.:- u. a I... .nfl:v o.~ptuvni Hau..-IU-MU iv ii...» thth AM u n..\nb!.u-AIvnflhwq-lb H. dun-Ni H FII~AI~.N fivhiufllflpb>< I 09‘. at NQIN-a.~r .oa H a .Amcoflum>uomno UoHHom How #moulu m.uco©sumv mo.°va« 33 mm.m ONH Hm om Noo HON I No wON o.H H o s.o H H N N mN.s mOH Hm as ice oo Hm I o WON . N N Hm e «H om Hm oo Hm I o 5.0 H o N.H H H N N mN.e NHH om om Hos oo mm I o wON N N mH ms Hm oo HoN I 0 so m.o H o m.o H o N N mN.~ oHH ms Hm Hos oo mm I o wON No .mm H .. >o .mm H >m Aoon omsaqomHv mm m .mmHo cams m .HHHQ cams m mmpetz mmoeaHHazm> .GHE\HE mm H 30am oooan humane Hmwnomua comm .Houusoo n HOV .oooHn macaw no mm H mm .oooHn macaw cauouco Mo sowmeou no u om .30Hm swo> oaacnmoo u >Um .3oam cwm> Hmanomua u >mm .msouomm> muommn oooan owcmmouomms use oaxomwn .owemmouuma: IUonmms zuflz soaumassflum uoumoomuoamno ofluouco ou noncommou QEHHoHOM ommum>< .MH manna . EflE\NE mm. H. 30am 00043 >IHQUHH... HQflCUQHQ Show: .HOHUCOU H «U» IwaMIH UHQQQ I.“ m- .vaHlm IEGHQ >I~50I~Q ~Fud£nvnwhnu fl INCL IQHSNQHWIHQ NSCfim muflUOHFuU “ “rum IQNDQWQHQ HQWIHvaIHfiu UqECI~E>W I. "In; I>E0UC~VQ> HGOIL a... UOOHQ UflCawflUhQQk-k Hut-H Uflxcawxfln \U,.HCo~m.UIHmvnw\An~ lUan»..>—.— 5“}: Cnv.&fl.~3E..&l LCJAmCCaanU—tmvchv mVfiUthquhv 09 IQQCFvnfimmeH QEiINmVIHOIIfi emvaHrsvbd‘ IN 0.50.3.5 34 ooscflusoo .MH H C . AmGOHUM>H0mQO ©0HHMQ MOM ummvlu. m.UGw©Dumv mo .0 V me. N N eOH HsH mHH NHH oo WON I o wON v.N Heb m.m Neva H.m HemH N N emH nNH OOH sHH Hos oo Hm I o HON N N smH mmH eNH qHH oo Hm I 0 HO H.N H NI s.v HeHH O.v HwOH N N OmH VNH HHH mHH on 00 em I o NON N N mmH . OHH omH nHH oo wON I 0 HO O.N H O e.O HHHN H.O Hwem N N omH OHH OHH OHH on oo Hm I o HON .mm H .mm H am .mm H m mo Aoan omeaqomHO .mmHo cows mm .mmHo new: a .mmHo new: m m mmoetz smosaHHezm> .cHs\Hs mm H 30H“ cooHn humane Hmwnocun new: .Houucoo HOV .oumu undo: H mm .ousm Locum muouum Amanomun H «mm .hEouomm> nouns woods owemmouomhn one oaxommn .owsmmouoahn owEoumMm Iowxomhs rues cowumassflum Houmoomuoeono cwuoumo on noncommmu AEHHmHom ommuo>4 .ouommoum macaw ofluoumo mom .ouommoum Hafiuouuc .N magma .cwE\NE mm I kon «HOOHD XHUJHQ Hafizoflhfi can»: I HOHUZOU H «U» IUOOHQ GDCflm M0 Moe an IQ IUOOHQ $35.3 UdU.C..-.~U LC 50w 1:me NO .I.II. NC: I30HN Cflmw.) Uflfiflinwnwhv nu URN IRON.“ Cflmv) .- E. a :U a... I. r.- 1. )2: I >..:. . C~uro> Laud L 5. wuauavHQ Ufi H.~o~mv.JIHIUN.~\fl.I~ mu: flu U MynOlLINN \Ufl:fi~.unuIHmvfi~\a Na in.- u VAAIvE—xr-n n-J « 3 unqu— due — a:.. H I. I Idnb «aalIUIIHIIwIHAUCNnbfi-YV MUW #0-»:ch 3U sums-nunnauaimohfi Pant! finWIHCIH «HUNQEIL aluv>< o HIMI‘ .vaNIIIINHVrNI 35 .mH u : .Amsoflum>ummno UoHHom HOm Hoopla m.ucoo5umv mo.ouImH N N HO.H ONH pm me oo HON o HON 0.0 H HI H.O H O N N 5N.e OHH OH NH on oo Hm I o HON . N N 5N s «H mm as oo Hm I 0 HO m.O H H 0.0 H O N N mN.e OHH em . «a Hos oo Hm I o HON . N N NO O OH OH we 00 HON I 0 HO H.H H m O.H H O N N ON.n mHH mm as Hos oo Hm I o HON No .mm H >o .mm H >m HozaH omsaqomHv mm m .mmHo new: a .HHHQ new: m mmosxez-wmoe«HHezm> ‘4‘111 J‘ 11“i iii 4‘ .cHE\HE mm I son oooHn mnounm Hmwnomnn coo: .Honucoo u AUV .cooHn msch mo .m H mm .GOOHA macaw cwuouwo mo coamcou mo u mom .3on sfio> omenmoo n um .30Hm :Hm> awesomun n >mm .NEouomm> nouns oooHn oacmmouomhn use caxomm: .oflsmmouommn Iowxom>£snufi3 coaumHsEHum MonmoomHOEono vapoumo ou noncommmu nEHHoHom ommuo>< IMN mHQMB sun and ruse; A represe are and forel §55 fixture is 5:3: an expert :c:'::ol period 533 control ga TEltilatory ga. ilcod perfusinI 315.151}! from 1 its sinuses deI byanarked im 53".. v .uOuSlon pres: I‘m ‘1‘.“ .‘.lug no diff‘ i915. Caretid 36 skin and muscle. The only change in heart rate was an in- crease during chemoreceptor stimulation with hypercapnic blood. A representative response of the systemic arterial pres- sure and forelimb perfusion pressure to the hypoxic—hypercapnic gas mixture is presented in Figure 2. This figure was taken from an experimental recording following vagotomy. During the control period the extracorporeal lung was ventilated with the control gas mixture (20% O — 5% C02). Upon switching the 2 ventilatory gas to 0% O - 20% CO the O tension of the 2 2 2 blood perfusing the carotid sinus perfusion circuit fell rapidly from 105 to 20 mm Hg. The pH of the blood perfusing the sinuses decreased from 7.28 to 6.91. This was accompanied by a marked increase in systemic arterial and brachial artery perfusion pressure. Outflows from the brachial and cephalic veins were not altered during chemoreceptor stimulation indi- cating no differential effect on the skin or muscle vascular beds. Carotid sinus perfusion pressure remained relatively constant with any changes being immediately compensated by adjusting the variable resistance clamp on the sinus outflow cannula. Upon returning to ventilation with the control gas, systemic arterial and brachial artery perfusion pressure rapidly returned to control levels. A typical response to the hypoxic gas mixture following vagotomy is shown in Figure 3. Upon switching from the con- trol gas mixture to 0% O - 5% CO a rapid fall in the O 2 2 2 37 ...... ....................... . I . . . . _ _ , . . . . . _ . l i , . _ H . N . . . . . N . . . ,. . . . . . . _. . . .. . _._ .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . _ . _. _, . , .. ._ . .. ,1 m. H , ._., .. . i . .. ... . . . I. . . \ ,.. \ l“ll",ll”illll_.1_‘111llxllilllillliillalixai.\\\\\\\HHHHHHHHH\ Govern ‘ NUUOTON‘ N00 *0. "03’0“ . N030 “6.939.“ .ousmmonm humans Huanomun 4mm >0 .BOHM aflo> Amanomun n >m .30Hm cHo> OHHmsmoo .mHSmonm Hofluopum OHEmumwm H mm .oooHn macaw mo mm H mm .musmmoum wscwm ofluonmo u mom .UooHn macaw ofluoumo mo cofimcou No u mom .moo coNHEouomw> m CH oooan oasmmonommnlowxommn nufl3 coflucasfiflum Howmmoouosono ofiuoumo ou uncommou HcHsomm> QEHHoHom o>Humusomonmm .N musmflm 38 m ouomflm E25 05:. ”WU,W WWUmWWI.HM M.....Wh.m.tcfij\1:0¢fi>i I“ I“ L. .rHHLF I :3. t I.III.H|. IFII. II. 39 . i‘.‘\I‘\ ...... /)I N lll‘ltllll'lldl‘lluolt .. . ... .... ............. .. . i . ..._ ..... ..H..l_ 1..” ........ .i.... .. ,,....._._ ....I. \ ...... ... 0€§ .I.......... ...._H,.. ......... t....,.. .._ ..\....~..__.. ...... «H‘ .. ................ ..H _._....,l....... ....... 1.._.,,,,_._.._. , .._._.. \ .‘cw 8N _nl_::ll...:_“N1:lltflilllflliaiilllaaa.:l.l.l_\fl_\\\\\\\ \.:..,.\\\\\\I 09*“ 09*“ NOV: N°$°N "030‘ “0:0“. Houmooonoamno .mHSmmon huounc Hmaaomun n m .3on cwo> oHHmnmoo u >0 .30Hm cflw> Hcflsomun u >m .ouommoum Hoanouum caaoummm u m .UooHn mocwm mo mm H mm .ousmmoum mscflm cauoumo n m .oooan macaw Uwuoumo mo cOHmcou NO n mom .moo Umuflfioeomm> m sfl oooHn oaxomma nuHS :owumHsEHum pfluoumo ou uncommon HmHsomm> QEHHoHOM o>flumucmmoumom .m ousmHm 40 m ousmfim issue: 0525 M .. i n¢u>nfi W H H II. E. I..I . . . , ..I. . .1. III . Ill , . 1. h b b» I F I I! at: :1: 1 I tension of tin 5:225 blood w :aratid sinus gerfusion pre vein outflows shift in flow tlcn with the may - 5..-; I"-u=‘cn pre A tYPica "I'h the hype figure 4. Ac L 13‘02‘ 20% I Q 5 liahe 3 ..ly' prOL‘ In. a . ‘ u‘fi‘ OciatiOn 'ne . 25...! ‘ ined un Ch '1 HIE SSUre inCr. Reaged from Isre not Sign 41 tension of the carotid sinus blood occurred. The pH of the sinus blood was uneffected by this gas mixture. At a constant carotid sinus pressure, systemic arterial and brachial artery perfusion pressure increased markedly. Brachial and cephalic vein outflows were not significantly altered, indicating no shift in flow between skin and skeletal muscle. Upon ventila- tion with the control gas,fsystemic pressure, brachial artery perfusion pressure, and P02 of the sinus blood rapidly re- turned to control levels. A typical reSponse to carotid chemoreceptor stimulation with the hypercapnic gas mixture after vagotomy is shown in Figure 4. After an initial control period, ventilation with 20% O2 - 20% CO2 was begun. The P02 of the sinus blood rose slightly, probably due to the effect of hydrogen ion on oxygen dissociation (Bohr effect). While carotid sinus pressure remained unchanged, systemic and brachial artery perfusion pressureincreased markedly. The pH of the sinus blood de- creased from 7.28 to 6.94. Brachial and cephalic outflows were not significantly altered. After returning to the con- trol gas mixture, systemic pressure and brachial artery per- fusion pressure rapidly returned to control levels. Intestine Table 3 shows the average responses of systemic blood pressure, heart rate and the vascular responses of the ileal 42 .................. IIIII..-, [If I L flair H L eiitlr tutti. “H._HMMMMM_..MHMMHHmHHHR_.__H\n\HHHH\_M. .............. \.\H\.H\\\ l___ i_llllt‘\i.rillwilllllrl.ilrrlili.\_iii.\\\\l\\n \\\\\\ \ «00.10»! 00 wTON\ U ROI-n ON I” N030“ .ouommoum wuowum Hmwnomun u fimm .30Hm aflo> oaamsmmo n >0 .30Hm cflw> Hcflnocua u >m .oHSmmon Hcfluouum OHEmUmmm H mm .oooHn mscflm mo mm H mm .ousmmmnm macaw Ufluoumo u mom .Uopo mscflm cfluosmo mo coamcou No n mom .moo UoNHEouomm> m CH cooan oecmmouommn nufl3 coaumasfifium Hoummomuofimno cwuoumo on uncommon Hmaoomm> QEHHmHom o>aumucmmoummm .v onsmflm 43 v musmfim 15.52:: a 0 I .v N o Stevie? . A . lwIanmnerl..... > .t vv n HroHL3 ucoEomm HooHH Zeno 42 .. u I. I . II I 33~H UCH—H H&w.Ho CHHQIHCvaE CGL HOHHCOU I «OH .UOOHQ mchm M0 .2Q H IQ .CCOHL mchm UHHOOPU MO COHmcLH O H CH .UHMH Hume: h :2 .thmmUHQ COHmDHHUQ HcoEtlz :wzeHH ; .OHZHmQHQ .HUHHUHHH UHEOmem H VQ .QHDHWUHQ WSCHW UHUOHQU I >50 HCHHHL> .HIHHIHHH UCOHQ O.HCQUUIHUHITCH Tin. UfiXOanC IUNHHQUIUIHUQACI UHXOQNC >CHC H... 1) 9H. HfiHHIHZIIH UHJ: H OH UH :Q-UCI HleNICIU refinvl>2 C H H3 504%. III. HIIHHHHHHH U m INAHUANUIUFH IN HLH o...p..s..u Ion-.IIHnflanHHH dew ochEsefiwnw IHnItvfi— .LAU NHHH-JUHHOII> IU~IumeIHti>< IMI e~fl~puflfi thy—HEAMAQHHIB I- a-Ha .3 «an-.4 Av a 1.3.7:..- 44 .m H G H AmGOHHMNVImeQO UGHHMQ HON Hmwfllu WHIIwflwvanvmv meoo Vnmkla .m u : .HmaOHum>ummno Umnwmm How nmmuup m.u:m©:umv mo.ouvm* . N N am m mma NHH mma mNH Hoa oo wON o wON o.m H m m.oH HHHON N.v H««mN N N N mm.n mma me mHH HOH moa HOV 00 wHN I o mON Nm.b ma NmH ova mmH NHH Noo wm No mo m.N H ml.. H.v HHHmH m.m “*HNN N N ov.H HmH moH mNH HHH NHH HoH ou wwm I 0 wow mm.w mH NoH Nma mmH NHH Noo NON No we o.N H «I n.mH “*HHH m.m «*HNH N N mm.n omH 00H HHH oHH HHH HoH ou Hmm I o HON. , NZOBOOHHSI mmemfl mm.o HH mmH Hm mmH mHH moo mom No we m.m H ma m.m H m m.m.H«me N N mm.n HHH moH an omH NNH HuH ou wwm I 0 wow wzoeowm> mmommm II No .mm H .mm H Hz .mm H m mu Huzoq amemqomHH mm m .HHHQ cams mm .HHHQ 2mm: m .mmHo cam: m m mmpetz wmoeaquzm> III I IJHHIII I .0 v« u unmflmz ucmfimmm Hmmafi cam: .GHE\HE 5H n 30Hw ocean mumuum OHHmucmmmw ocmww .Houucoo u HOV .UOOHQ macaw mo mm H mm .UooHn msch @Huoumo mo concmu om .mumu unmwn H mm .mHSmmmHm :onanmm unmamom mmHH u «Sm .wusmmmum Hwflumuum oafimummm H mm .wHSmmmum macaw cwuoumo n m m .m&ouomm> Hmumm oOOHn oflcmmonmahn can oaxommn .oficmmonmmmnluwxommn suflz Ucm meouomm> muowmn UOOHQ oasmmoummmnloflxommn nufl3 coauwanswum Hoummomu .m manna. IoEmno GHHOHMO on waflummygfl mo uswfimmm HmmHH uo mmmaommmu Huasomm> mmmum>¢ segent to per t};cxic-h;.'perc '1y;ercapnic, h lite only sign: irarease in 5;.- rate before v- C. - I acreases 1n 5; gressm-e Occur Sental 9a5es . w.§0real lu ”aging the fix: . «I13 reased marl ‘uyf‘. F ”anged h ‘55).“ 'L yskased f t“. . “5 u 1n 45 segment to perfusion of the carotid chemoreceptors with hypoxic-hypercapnic blood before vagotomy and with hypoxic- hypercapnic, hypoxic and hypercapnic blood following vagotomy. The only significant response produced before vagotomy was an increase in systemic arterial pressure. The changes in heart rate before vagotomy were insignificant. Following vagotomy increases in systemic pressure and ileal segment perfusion pressure occurred during ventilation with each of the experi- mental gases. Systemic arterial pressure increased to a greater extent (36%) during hypoxic-hypercapnic stimulation than during hypoxic alone (20%) or hypercapnic stimulation alone (25%). Similarly, a greater increase in ileal segment perfusion pressure occurred during hypoxic-hypercapnic (37%) than during hypoxia only (12%) or hypercapnia alone (17%). No significant changes in heart rate were observed. A typical response of the isolated ileal segment and systemic blood pressure to carotid body chemoreceptor stimu- lation with the hypoxic-hypercapnic gas mixture after vagotomy is shown in Figure 5. During the control period the extra- corporeal lung was ventilated with 20% O - 2 % CO After 2 2' changing the ventilatory gas to 0% O2 - 20% CO2 systemic arterial pressure and perfusion pressure of the ileal segment increased markedly while carotid sinus pressure remained unchanged. The pH of the blood perfusing the carotid sinuses decreased from 7.45 to 7.00. In this animal fluctuations in the intraluminal pressure of the ileal segment appeared to 46 ..,_.i_.,::___:::l.i._.e. \ii.i.i.;.,__._l._..i.;.;,..i.\...__i.._\...\.\.g. .:;. _.... ..._.. “00*“-Nuu . "00.30“ ‘ \\ \ \ . \ x \ x x. kw 0‘ “OI-19°“ “0 Av .munmmoum coflmSMHmm ucmfimmm Hmoafi n m .mhsmmmum Hafinmuum owEmUmmm H m .Uooan mscflm mo mm H mm .ousmmoum macaw vapoumo n m .ucmEmom HmmHH mo oHsmmmHm Hmcflfidamuucfl u 2 .Hoo pmNHEouomm> 0 ca pooHQ oacmmoummmSIUflxome nufl3 COfluMHDEHum Hoummowu loamno pfluoumo on ucoEmmm Hmoafl mo oncommwn Hmasomm> m>fiumucwmoumom .m musmflm 47 m Gunman E25 «E: iecrease during return to the ‘ :ent perfusion nifluctuatiOI agnitude. Represent vagotomy are 5 control gas mi sxeand ileal while carotid iecarotid si mehypoxic 95 than the cont: “2M1 fluctutl zheileal Sec: Stilulation. Pressure and toControl 1e A tYpice astemic 1310} h hypercagl 48 decrease during chemoreceptor stimulation. Following the return to the control gas, systemic pressure and ileal seg- ment perfusion pressure rapidly returned toward control levels and fluctuations in the intraluminal pressure increased in magnitude. Representative responses produced by hypoxia after vagotomy are shown in Figure 6. Upon switching from the control gas mixture to 0% O2 - 5% CO2 systemic arterial pres- sure and ileal segment perfusion pressure increased markedly while carotid sinus pressure remained unchanged. The pH of the carotid sinus blood decreased from 7.46 to 7.36 because the hypoxic gas mixture (0% O - 5% C02) contained more CO 2 than the control gas mixture (20% O 2 - 2%% C02). In this 2 animal fluctuations in the intraluminal pressure and tone of the ileal segment appeared to increase during chemoreceptor stimulation. Upon returning to the control gas, systemic pressure and ileal segment perfusion pressure rapidly returned to control levels and fluctuations in the intraluminal pres- sure and tone diminished. A typical response of the ileal segment vasculature and systemic blood pressure to carotid chemoreceptor stimulation with hypercapnic blood is presented in Figure 7. After a con- trol period, the extracorporeal lung was ventilated with 20% O2 - 20% C02. The pH of the sinus blood decreased from 7.42 to 6.91. Systemic pressure and ileal segment perfusion pressure increased markedly while carotid sinus pressure showed 49 4......_.yj.g....._;; .\.,_.\. .....:::.:_.._.z..._,::::..\,:\\:. .......\.......\.r 0‘ U .ousmmmum GOHmSMHom acofiwom Hmoafl u m .mnsmwmum Hafiuouum UHEoumMm H mm .UOOHQ mscflm «0 mm H mm .mnsmmoum madam pfluoumo u mom .ucosmow Hmoafl mo whammmum HmcHESHmnpcw u z .006 pmNHEouomm> m sH pooHn oaxommn nuw3 :oaumasfiflum Hoummomu loamno pfluonmo ou ucoemwm Hmoafl mo oncommmu amazomm> m>aumucmmmnmom .m mupmflm 50 Time (min) 4 Figure 6 51 r : h. _ w_:._l...;_:\:i:\iq.iste:i:>:gToV .. ,.H.H _._._ ._. ..Ki.~.;._\,_.l_ ._. “ O _ M ___._._._ _ .__ _ l a L 53%;... _ i L l l N O“ 0.93“ N“ r L _ _ U “”06“ “03°“ U .oHSmmmum coamsmumm ucmemmm Hmoafi u mzm .mMSmmmum Hafiumuum anmumwm H mm .pooan mscflm mo mm H mm .muammmum madam payoumo u mum .ucmamom Honda mo whammmum amnespamuucfl u z .mov pouflfiouomm> m CH pooan Oficmmoummmn spfl3 :OflpmHsEflum Houmooou Iosmno cwuonmo ou ucwEmwm Hmmaw mo oncomwmn HmHsomm> m>wumuammwummm .h munmflm 52 Time (:nin) nacho, <:- 30““?! .2496“); Figure 7 Little change. aggear to diffs geriod. Upon r 3‘.i ileal segme :ontrol values The avera 5E'stenic blood carotid chemo: Vagotomy and V blood followil "7" Systemic PreSSure did Following Vag hE‘PerCapnic c Stimulation « ‘pcx‘l‘c‘hYpe Superior mes EiCh expeerr :creaSed m 53 little change. Intraluminal pressure fluctuations did not appear to differ significantly from those of the control period. Upon returning to the control gas, systemic pressure and ileal segment perfusion pressure rapidly returned to control values. The average responses of the superior mesenteric artery, systemic blood pressure and heart rate to perfusion of the carotid chemoreceptors with hypoxic-hypercapnic blood before vagotomy and with hypoxic-hypercapnic, hypoxic and hypercapnic blood following vagotomy are shown in Table 4. Before vagot- omy, systemic pressure and superior mesenteric artery perfusion pressure did not change. The heart rate was also unchanged. 4 Following vagotomy, systemic pressure increased during hypoxic- hypercapnic chemoreceptor stimulation and with hypercapnic stimulation alone. Systemic pressure increased by 37% during hypoxic-hypercapnic and by 23% during hypercapnia alone. Superior mesenteric artery perfusion pressure increased with each experimental gas mixture. Mesenteric artery pressure increased more during hypoxic-hypercapnia (50%) than during hypoxia (17%) or hypercapnia alone (15%). The heart rate was not altered significantly by any maneuver. Kidney Table 5 shows the average reSponses of the kidney, sys- temic blood pressure and heart rate to perfusion of the .2HE\~E was n ko~m noose >h3uhfl UflkQUCCEGE HOflRQQSW C602 MHOHUCOU N «U» .UOOHQ NBCflm N0 mm H :Q uquAUHn m~.C.Hmu Ufiuadhflu .. AU CO.«..mu.Cva NO H Oaw omflmu Ukflumv: uh ~w- cmvhzmwmwmwhnw \fiMmVUch. Uwhiapzvfifip: LC~u~012I P 2.0; .0L:EEGL€~ HGHkUUHfi» Um_=aw.~_w.\nmw nu UMW .mwhsmmmvhm meQNW «v_ .....~._...u H 3...»; .>..—A»~n0—.fl.> «hr-fa: Tau0~n~ Cufica~€thUa~>C meta UWXEXQNQ \Uflcahfiohu-u,.fl.l~\a~fi .;»v_ X..._>.- .. o '3 -.....~ 5...». ..u~..\\/ e.,--~...~.:~ ~zvn-A~ rvu ...»-...r.au~o.\.~\A—~Ilv- Y«AV..-A..~ as s ‘3 a..~‘ ufi.-::.‘ s5... -.- ..-nI.-tl nn-ubnvnan.- .uu 0.1 urvvi A. t oz. .0. U .I'V .b‘ It. ~Pbl!F.§a\-.I In»! III. \-nl lint III.iI.i-ou. ~r‘OIiyh ONNIQtSIV\.l4.\ 54 .v H c .AchHpm>Hoon Umuflmm How umoulu m.uco©sumv mo.ouvaN .m u : .Amcofium>uomno pouflmm Mow umopnu m.ucmp5umv mo.o”.mN OO.O HHH NNH ONH NNH NOH Noo NON . No NON N.N H N N.v HNNmH N.m H«¥MN N . N N ON.N mOH HNH NOH HOH NOH Nov 00 NNN . o NON NN.N NH NNH NHH ONH NHH Noo Nm No NO m.H H NI m.m Hrsha v.5 H mH N N N NN.N NO «NH HOH mHH NHH Nov oo N+N . o NON NO.O NH NNH mmH ONH mOH Noo NON No NO O.H N N O.OH NNNHm H.N NNNNN N N mN.N Na ONH NOH NOH NOH Nov 00 NNN . o NON Nzoeow¢> mmema N0.0 NH OmH OHH NNH OHH Noo NON No NO O.N N N N.N N NH O.m N NH N N mN.N NOH NmH OOH .1 NNH HNH Nov 00 N+N u o NON .Nzoeoo<> mmommm .1 No .mm N .mm N azm .mm N m mo szaq omaaqomHO mm a .NNNO new: mm .NNNO new: a .NNNQ new: a m mmoetz mmoeaquzm> ‘ 4 J 114‘44411‘ ‘4] .QHE\HE vba n 30Hm UOOAA Nymphs oanoucomoe nowHoQSm coo: .Houucoo n .pooHn macaw mo mm H mm AUV .pooHn macaw pflwoumo Wm :owmcoy «o u mom .oumu ammo: H mm .ousmmoum humans ofluoucomoe HowquSm H mm .mHSmmoum Hafinounm owfioumwm H mm .onsmmoum macaw Uwuoumo u mum .maouomm> Hovmm pooan owcmmouomhn can oaxommn NUNQQMUHomhn loaxommc nua3 can maouomm> oHOMon pooHn vasomonommnlowxommn suds :oaumHSEHum uoumoooHOEmno UNNOHmo on muonum oauoucwmofi uoflnwmsm mo momsommou omnum>< .v manna :1 Co .uuflo coo: z: .522 552 so .ttwc cat: o “lan 41"“ .CflE\HE OHH H 30H“ UOOHQ Khmuhfl HQCWH Page“ O.HO.HJP~OU a" ADV QUOOHQ mudgufim .mflo :flm n” IAN omUOOHuhN mudgufim MUHUOMMMU “W0 EOflmcmu no I... NAVL -0.th JHUmvz 1..., z: -Ohsamoxunw \AuHmWUszw .HflvawzH “ Zak .Utflzmumumxul HQflHmdUL-W adv-nab {NA-u- .1 $4.4 o ruvtu—u-a.u.vl-N~ 3:: v 3 H4 m. ya nulsfvvv fin mU.N u \wiholu Okvfiv> .Hflv‘u LH Ev NUOOM Had (a NHNQHUMVLNAUTNXNN mean!» we. vh.,..—\fl,- \ruw.N.—ex-e...!l.v.~\f.—l--4~.vh.vn..~\fl.~ -d ~59 Pv-PV \A...flv~A.v~,w-nv\f fiv.-..v...~y..v- Pvfian~A~ nus -A..-%.f.vt~1s.NNA~\ I .u‘ VA. ->.- n. U ‘3 nu-wd .12.;- qI-.- o.‘ In: ssh-Unurb.uav.-flbnfixb ~U~1 havhlhrv “Hui. lV~&~.hn.u-illfinmv.~ Lfln.in-ui z oNV\H-c..c,hn..ri\l< 01,15. m‘ ~ h.\lk‘.Nu 55 .OH H C N AmCOH#M>H®mQO Umhflmm HOW #mw#l# m.#C®UD#mV m0.0 V m¥ NO.O NNH OOH ONH NNH NOH Noo NON No NON N.H N N- O.N N NON O.O N NON N N N ON.N ONH OOH ON ON HOH Nov oo NNN . o NON ON.N OH HOH ONH ONH OOH Noo NO No NO H.N N O N.OH N NON O.O N.NOH N . N NN.N NHH OOH NO HOH NOH Nov 00 NNN . o NON NO.O OH OOH OOH ONH OOH Noo NON No NO O.O NNN O.OH N NOO O.O N «NO N N ON.N NHH NOH HO NOH OOH Nov oo NNN u o NON Nzoeou<> mmemfi O0.0 OH NOH ONH ONH NHH Noo NON No NO O.H N H N.OH NNOO m.N NNOH N N N OO.N HNH HOH OO ONH OHH Nov oo NAN I o NON Nzoeoua> mmommm No .mm N .mm N m .mm N O we Nozoq OmeaquHO mm m .mmfla can: mm .NNNQ new: m .NNNQ cmmz m m mmoatz amoequazm> 41114444 4 .GNE\HE cad u 30am poodn muouum Anson comm .Houucoo u AUV .oooHQ mscflm no mm H mm .pooHn macaw pfluonmo mo coamcou o n mom .ouwu ammo: H mm .ousmmoum humans Hmaou H mm .ousmmoum Hmwuouum owamummm H mm .musmmoum macaw pwuoumo u mom .mfiouommb Hmumm cocan aflcmmoummmn can owxomhn .oficmmouommnIOonmms nuw3 can Neouomm> whomon pooan oacmmoummmn Iowxommn saws cowumadeflum MonmoooHOEmao wfluoumo on oncommou hospwx mmmuo>¢ .m manna 11': carotid chemo: vagotomy and v blood after va artery perfusi the heart rate greasure and i :ificantly duz in heart rate :lation with C J. Systemic pr I313) than dur :3“ “Lularly' ren (If'r' 56 carotid chemoreceptors with hypoxic-hypercapnic blood before vagotomy and with hypoxic-hypercapnic, hypoxic and hypercapnic blood after vagotomy. Systemic arterial pressure and renal artery perfusion pressure increased before vagotomy, while the heart rate was unchanged. Following vagotomy, systemic pressure and renal artery perfusion pressure increased sig- nificantly during each experimental maneuver. The only change in heart rate was a slight increase during chemoreceptor stim- ulation with combined hypoxia and hypercapnia. The increase in systemic pressure was greater during hypoxic-hypercapnia (31%) than during hypoxia (19%) or hypercapnia alone (23%). Similarly, renal artery perfusion pressure increased more during the combined hypoxic-hypercapnia (65%) than during hypoxia (49%) or hypercapnia alone (44%). Figure 8 presents a representative record during chemo- receptor stimulation with hypoxic-hypercapnic blood following vagotomy. After a control period during which the extra- , ventila- corporeal lung was ventilated with 20% O — 2%% CO 2 2 tion was changed to 0% O2 - 20% C02. The pH of the carotid sinus blood decreased from 7.42 to 6.91. As the O2 tension of the carotid sinus blood fell, systemic arterial pressure and renal artery perfusion pressure increased while carotid sinus pressure remained constant. Upon returning to the con- trol gas, systemic pressure and renal artery perfusion pressure returned to near control values. 57 .OooHn .moo woNHEouomm> m coaumasefluw HoumoooHOEmno vapoumo «0030“ ‘ Nonvghofl“ “0:0 .pooan macaw mo mm H mm .muzmmmum wumunm Hmcou H mm .ounmmoum HMHHouHm OHEwumwm H mm .mHSmmoum macaw Ufluoumo n mum macaw vapoumo mo coflmcou NO n mom ca oooan ownmmouommnIOonmmn sufl3 ou mmaommou Nocpflx o>wumucomoumwm .m ousmflm 58 m whamwm .5535: o I I l .d l l): 32.55 . . ”N. x. , , . l , , . .l , HE. lirlrt. NLLrir . ..... . Cwmqpfimfifi can . ..L.;O.Mr..;fl.trlu .... ii. 1....r N «Ouoxoou ‘ «agend- «0030 «0.53 .. A typicai '2: stinulati Figure 9. Af 'reztilated wi '55P Of th‘ we 02 iecreased frc :ixture conte PIESSure and even with a 1 ”turning to artery perfu A repre IECeptOr sti is Show) in ExtrdCOrpOrE :16 pH Of t} 15:1: Pressx While carot; to the Cont; ‘1 ‘. e rapidl he av SE'Stem. lc Pr thingy. 59 A typical renal vascular response to carotid chemorecep- tor stimulation with hypoxic blood after vagotomy is shown in Figure 9. After a control period the extracorporeal lung was ventilated with 0% O - 5% CO2 which produced a decrease in 2 the P of the carotid sinus blood. The pH of the sinus blood 0 decreased from 7.37 to 7.30, again, because the hypoxic gas mixture contained more CO2 than the control mixture. Systemic pressure and renal artery perfusion pressure increased markedly even with a slight rise in carotid sinus pressure. After returning to the control gas, systemic pressure and renal artery perfusion pressure rapidly decreased to control values. A representative response of the kidney to carotid chemo— receptor stimulation with hypercapnic blood after vagotomy is shown in Figure 10. Following a control period, the extracorporeal lung was ventilated with 20% O2 — 29% C02. The pH of the sinus blood decreased from 7.39 to 6.87. Sys- temic pressure and renal artery perfusion pressure increased while carotid sinus pressure remained constant. Upon returning to the control gas, systemic pressure and renal artery pres- sure rapidly returned to control levels. Heart The average responses of the coronary vasculature, systemic pressure and left ventricular contractile force to chemoreceptor stimulation by hypoxic-hypercapnic blood in 60 . . . coaumHDEHum . . . .M h . . . .. .. .. .. ... ._ l . _ , .. . l. l. .. .2 x _. N . . l N . . . ‘ i . .. H _. , O _ .i A _ u _ . . . . . . “ougn ‘ U Nousn-«| ‘ “0:0 "0:0“ I . _ ‘Iccc .pooHn macaw mo mm H mm .musmmoum humans Hmcon H mm .mHSmmmHm Hmwuouum anmummm H mm .ousmmmum macaw vapouwo n mom N .pooHn macaw pfluoumo mo cowmcou NO u om .moo oo~a80pomm> m CH pooHQ oaxommn :uHB Houmooouofioso payoumo on oncommou wmcpflx o>aumucomoumom .m ousmflm 61 m wuswflm if as: Q N O O— 0 IJ‘IIIIII- Illllllllll I I I ants—E. mu‘ 315.5 62 _ . . . . . _ . . -.3-1 ‘Cniaiacc N l\ Nousn0“ll U ‘ “03°“ “0:0“ .I .pooHn macaw mo mm H mm .ousmmmum muouum Hmcou H mm .oHSmmon Hafiuouum ONEoummm H mm .oudmmmum msGHm pfluoumo u mum .pooHQ macaw pfluonmo mo cowmcmu No n «on .moo poNHEouomm> M GA pecan UHCQmUHoQNQ spas cowumaseflum nonmooouosono pfluoumo on oncommou hospflx o>HHMNcomonom .OH musmflm 63 OH wusmflm is. 2.: 315.... mu‘ 3.2.... «on 64 ten animals before vagotomy are shown in Figure 11. During the control period the extracorporeal lung was ventilated with 20% 02 - 24% coz. Ventilation with 0% 02 - 20% (:02 was then begun at time 0 seconds (Figure 11). The pH of the carotid sinus blood decreased from 7.44 to 6.96. As the carotid sinus blood P fell, systemic arterial pressure increased significantly from 60 to 210 sec. while coronary artery perfu- sion pressure rose significantly only at 60 and 90 sec. Left ventricular contractile force decreased significantly from 90 to 210 sec., stabilizing at a point 9% below the control value by 210 sec. The heart rate was significantly lowered from 164 to 156/min. The average effects of the same hypoxic-hypercapnic chemoreceptor stimulus in ten animals following vagotomy are shown in Figure 12. Carotid sinus blood pH decreased from 7.39 to 6.95. Accompanying the fall in carotid sinus blood P systemic pressure increased markedly from 60 to 210 sec. 0 I 2 while coronary perfusion pressure rose slightly only at 60 sec. Left ventricular contractile force decreased from 90 to 210 sec., reaching a point 19% below the control value by 210 sec. There was no significant change in heart rate (159 to 157/min). The average responses to hypoxic chemoreceptor stimula- tion in ten animals after vagotomy are presented in Figure 13. Carotid sinus-blood pH decreased slightly from 7.36 to 7.32. As the carotid sinus blood PO fell, systemic pressure 2 65 .OH H .CHE\HE mHH n 30am UOOHQ wnmcouoo .ooH0w oafluomuucoo HmHDONHucm> puma u .pooHa mscwm vapoumo mo coawcou NO u .musmmoum HMNHouHm UNEoumNm .wusmmoum CONmSMHom mumcouoo .wEouomm> ouomon pooHn oacmmoummmaloflxommn Qua; C com: m0>q NOm mm moom soap IMHDEHum Hoummoouoeono pfiuoumo on oncommmn Hmasomm> mumcouoo ommum>¢ .HH mNsONn 66 HH musmHm «39.33030 39...»:— 53 «no. a {co—2:3 mode... .3 N" 38:. uOu us: DON 00— O 4 4 q 1 3.” w ¢ ON... 1 ‘1? 1T it 50>.— A V .‘ODOA .1 oBuoq: 1, N ‘0 N 0°— ‘1 a a a on k a N 80* n on— »!opoogucn NOU$ON .I «0400 67 ImanEfium >2°hoo<>bW°l 0000\00N II ICIVOC .oa n .CHE\HE mHH n 30am UOOHQ mumcouoo .ooHOM oafluomnucoo Hoasofluuco> uwma .UOOHQ mscfim vapoumo mo coflmcou NO .onsmmonm Hmflnounm oweoummm .oHSmmonm coflmsmuom whosouoo .NEouomm> Houwm pooHn oacmmouwmwnlofixommn nufl3 C coo: mU>A NONH mm moum CON» HONQoooHOEono pflponmo ou oncommmn HmHsomm> Nnmconoo ommno>< .NH onsmwm 68 NH musmflm «30203030 $9.23. 3m to. O «Leo—2:3 mOJAN .3 “N 2:82 van us..— oo« 2: 0 Nb 1 mm . 33 . . 1m- lwon n 6 T 3+- 3 a H N n 0.. n w “H B “VIII-In ‘ 8005 n >£opoo<>50n «09.50" I. «0.30 69 :oHpmadEHum .OH H .GME\HE mHH u Beam UOOHQ mnmcouoo .moHOM mHfluomuucoo Haasoflnucm> puma u .UOOHQ macaw Uwuoumu mo coflmcmu NO n .mHSmmmHm Huanmuum OHEwumMm .wHSmmmHQ cowmsmumm wumcouoo u .mEouomm> Hmumm wooan Oflxomhn G cmmz MU>A mom mm moum sufls HouamomuoEmzo Uwuonmo on mmcoammn Hmasomm> mumcouoo mmmum>¢ .ma musmflm 70 " ..... .w'I'Vy; .P _ n . w ma musmflm 7:33:0ch taxman 3m to. . {5:33. “361.. .mm a 28.2 3. us: DON 009 0 Nb I 3 «I oul .. w + 01 d .. .. . On W n . .u>._ Lm Jr a U o s B “I ON+ 1 m 00— i L c IOut On— »!opoogpmg «00.5“ I. «Oo\o0 71 increased significantly from 90 to 210 sec. Coronary sinus perfusion pressure was significantly increased at 60 sec but then gradually decreased during the remainder of the experi- mental period. Left ventricular contractile force decreased significantly from 90 sec onward, reaching a point 14% below control by 210 sec. The heart rate was unchanged (158 to :”§ 157/min). The average responses to hypercapnic chemoreceptor stimu- lation in nine dogs after vagotomy are presented in Figure 14. j The P02 of the carotid sinus blood rose, Probably due to the Bohr effect. The sinus blood pH decreased from 7.37 to 6.92. Systemic pressure increased significantly from 60 sec onward while coronary perfusion pressure showed no significant change. Left ventricular contractile force decreased significantly from 90 sec onward, reaching a point 9% below control by 210 sec. The heart rate was unchanged (158/min). A second series of heart studies was carried out on vagotomized animals in which graded carotid chemoreceptor stimulation was accomplished by perfusing the chemoreceptors with the combined hypoxic-hypercapnic blood and with blood having varying degrees of hypoxia and hypercapnia. Figure 15 is a representative record showing the responses of the systemic pressure, coronary perfusion pressure and left ventricular contractile force to ventilation of the extra- corporeal lung with the hypoxic-hypercapnic gas (0% O - 20% 2 C02) after‘vagotomy. Following the control period, ventilation 72 .m H .GHE\HE mad u 30Hm @OOHQ mumcouoo .oouom oafluomuucoo HmHSOfiHucm> puma n .oooan mscflm vapoumo mo coflmcmu No .mnzmmmum Hafiumuum OHEmummm n .mnsmmmnm coflmsmuom wumcouoo .meouomm> Hmuwm pooHn Oflcmmonmmmz nuHB C cam: m0>q mom mm moum :oflu IstEHpm uoumwomHOEmso payoumo Op wmcommmu Hmasomm> wumcouoo mmmum>¢ .vH musmwm 73 v. magmam «2.029.330 19:01 50* .3. . «1.3.233 HAWK... .3 a 2.3.2 900 us..— 008 00— o 1 d 1 i1 ON I W $.— U>.— 1'1 W w on ON... oBuoq: 4% '1'3‘A'1 38055384 n & 00p 8001 On — 220.2333; «00$ON I «OofiON .mnsmmoum Goamswumm humcouoo .ooHOu mawuomuucoo HMHSOHHqu> puma .onsmmmum ammuwuum oafimuwmm .UOOHQ mscflm mo mm .UOOHQ mUCHw muH¥OHMO MO GOHWGQH. NO 74 ll moom .mU>.H m m an mom .moo UoNHEouomm> m 2% pooHQ UflcmmonQmQIOflxomhs no.3 coaumasfifium HoummomHoEozo vapoumo on oncommou HmHsomm> kHMGOHoo m>flumpcmmmummm .mH musmflm 75 ma whamflm Ewes 9:: «coffin «Ochoa I 76 with the experimental gas was begun and the typical marked rise in systemic arterial pressure was observed as the pH and P0 of the sinus blood fell. Left ventricular contrac- 2 tile force decreased remaining well below the control level. In this animal, the coronary perfusion pressure showed a transient decrease followed by a return to near control value. Upon returning to the control gas, systemic pressure rapidly decreased toward control as the carotid sinus pH and PO 2 returned to control values. Left ventricular contractile force increased as the coronary perfusion pressure rose to a level slightly above the control level. Figure 16 is a representative record showing responses to a reduced degree of hypoxic—hypercapnia (10% O2 - 10% C02) . Following the control period the extracorporeal lung was Ventilated with the experimental gas, which produced roughly 50% of the fall in carotid sinus blood pH and PO obtained 2 with the previous gas mixture. At a constant carotid sinus pressure, systemic pressure increased. Left ventricular contractile force fell slightly while coronary perfusion pres- Sure was unchanged. Upon returning to the control gas, Systemic pressure rapidly returned to control. Left ventric- ular contractile force rose to a level above control while coronary perfusion pressure remained unaltered. Representative reSponses produced by chemoreceptor S . tlmulation with a less hypercapnic gas mixture (20% O2 - 10% C 02) than that employed in the first series of coronary .musmmmnm coflmsmumm wumcouoo .00H0m mafluomnucoo Hmaoofluucm> puma .musmmmum HMflHmuum OHEwumhm .UOOHQ macaw mo mm .UOOHQ mscflm pfiponmo mo coamcmu NO 77 mOU mU>A mm mm mom .mow UoNHEouomm> m CH pooHQ oacmmoummmnloflxomwn mmoH suflz coflumHSEflum uoumoomuofimno Ufluoumo ou omcommmm HmHsomm> mumcouoo m>HumucwmmHmmm .ma wusmflm 78 ma mudmflm i=5 2:: «33nd- U N0.5.... - 79 studies (20% O - 20% C02) is shown in Figure 17. At a 2 constant carotid sinus pressure, systemic pressure rose as the sinus blood pH fell. Left ventricular contractile force decreased while coronary perfusion pressure remained un- changed. Returning to the control gas produced a rapid decrease in systemic pressure toward the control level and an increase in left ventricular contractile force that reached a steady state above the control value. Coronary artery perfusion pressure remained unchanged. The average responses of the coronary vasculature, systemic blood pressure and left ventricular contractile force to hypoxic-hypercapnic chemoreceptor stimulation follow- ing vagotomy are shown in Figure 18. In six animals, the mean pH and P02 of the sinus blood decreased from 7.43 and 105 mm Hg to 6.96 and 17 mm Hg, respectively. Systemic pres- sure increased markedly from 60 sec onward while coronary perfusion pressure was unchanged until 90 sec when a transient insignificant decrease occurred which gradually returned to the control level. Left ventricular contractile force de- creased significantly from 90 sec onward, reaching a point 27% below the control level. No change in heart rate was Observed (14l/min). Figure 19 shows the average responses to chemoreceptor Stimulation with a reduced degree of hypoxic-hypercapnia (10% O2 - 10% C02). The mean pH and P0 of the carotid sinus 2 b100d decreased from 7.45 and 108 mm Hg to 7.15 and 63 mm Hg, l‘ h. n : Q 80 .oHSmmon cowmamumm humcouoo u moum .mouow wafiuomuucoo Haasofluuco> puma n mU>A .mudmmmum Hmflumuum oefimumwm u m .pooHn modem «0 mm H mm .pooan msawm Uwuoumo mo cowwcou No u «Gm .006 pmNHEouomw> m ca pooan Uflcmmoummmn nuflz coaumasaflum uoummomuoemno pfluoumo ou mmcommmu umHsomm> mumcouoo m>aumgcmmmummm .ha musmflm 81 QQN «033...? _ «0.58 I ma musmflm SE. 2:: Q Q—N fl: Teen floou ovsuze 3. ”an; «3.5.2- U «0.5% 32.5... «Out 82 Inseam Om " a .cflE\HE mHH u 30Hm pooHn humcouoo cows .oonou oafluomuucoo HMHSOfiHucm> puma n mU>A .mhsmmwum scamsmuom mumcouoo u moom .mHsmmmnm Hafiuouum anmummm H mm .meouomm> umumm cooan Uficmmoummmnnowxomms nuflz cowumH uoumoomHOEmno pfluoumo ou mmcommwu MMHDUmM> wumcouoo mmmnm>< .mH oudmflm 83 ad musmfim «25:033.... 19:2; 50m .3. . 3.2.35.3 Mada... .mm a. 2:35. can a:.... oo« oo. o . d a on n a a. e? . . . . 32. . . n 3 1. as I. O ‘ a H .A II. M .. . 'y - B u. 1.3. m 0 ca... .. w H" mm B . . on. 22039350.. «0030“ I «030 84 IDEHum omuc .GHE\HE mHH u 3oaw pooHn mumcouoo cmmz MU>A .wunmmmnm cofimswnwm anaconoo n moum .mouom maauomuucoo Hmasowuucm> puma .wusmmmum amaumuum OHEmummm H mm .weouomm> umuwm pooan venomouwmmnlofixommn nuflz cofluma Hoummomuoemno pfluoumo o» mmcommmu Hmasomm> >Hmconoo mommm>< . 3 353m 85 aBump % 0‘03. .1 C d I a n. Baum: w _. . . . flirt a. mesmem 3.32.6302... 39:01 to. .3. . {co—2:3 MOJ... .mm a... «.802 90a us..— OON 00— o O N I 1 ON... I d d d 4 On— >£o.oo<>.mo.. «0950—. I. «00b0— 86 respectively. Systemic arterial pressure increased from 90 sec on while there was no change in coronary perfusion pressure. Left ventricular contractile force decreased significantly from 90 sec onward, reaching a point 5% below the control level. The change in heart rate from 140 to l42/min was not significant. The average responses to varying degree of hypoxic chemoreceptor stimulation are shown in Figures 20 and 21. Hypoxic stimulation by 5% O2 - 2%% CO2 in two animals and 113% O2 2 in three animals produced no changes in Systemic pressure, coronary perfusion pressure or left ven- - z-g-sz co tricular contractile force. During carotid sinus hypoxia of the carotid sinus irlduced by 5% 02 the mean pH and PO 2 bJJDOd were altered from 7.44 and 111 mm Hg to 7.45 and 38 rm“. Hg, respectively. During hypoxia induced by 10% 02 the mean pH and PO were altered from 7.44 and 111 mm Hg to 7.43 2 allCi 45 mm Hg, respectively. Changes in heart rate during (154 to Ventilation with 5% 02 (139 to l4l/min) and 10% 02 lSl/min) were not significant. Figure 22 shows the average responses to a lesser degree C>f5 hypercapnic chemoreceptor stimulation. Systemic pressure ILruzreased from 60 sec onward. Coronary perfusion pressure Varied with signigicant increases only at 60, 90, 180 and 210 Benz. Left ventricular contractile force declined gradually becoming significant at 150 sec. By 240 sec it was 6% below of the carotid sinus blood 'the control value. The PH and Po 2 87 oNuc .CHE\HE «NH u 30Hm pooHQ humconoo cmmz .moH0m mawuomuucoo “masoflhuco> puma H mo>q .musmmmum GOflmsmnmm mumconoo u moum .mHSmmmHm HMflHmpum OflEmumwm H mm .mEouomm> Hmumm pooHn Oflxommn nuHB cowva ISEHum Hoummoonoaono pflponmo ou mmcommmu HmHSOmm> mumcouoo mommm>¢ ‘ f ‘2. .om musmfim 88 06mm: 1, 0,03. .1 0“. v ON+ em mesmem a«:o.:c>3«no 19.3.. .31 .3. . «1.3123 mode... .3 a 2.2.: 90« m2..— OON oo— 33 1. I i III'III ION— »20.oe<>.3m «OUXW.N I «0RD ' 89 .m “C .CHE\HE Hma n 30Hw UooHn hnmcouoo cmwz .mouom mafluomuucoo Hmasofluucm> umma .mHSmmmnm coflmswuma wumaouoo .mHSmmmHQ HMflHmuum UHEmpmww .mEouomm> Hmumm COOHQ Oflxomhn mmma m npfl3 II mU>A moum mm GOflumH ISEHum HoummomHOEono pfluonmo ou mmcommmu Haasomm> mumcouoo mmmuw>¢ .HN mHDmHm 90 08mm: % 'i’D'A'1 ONI ON... F“. .- ‘m F iii. Hm musmwm 3.329.330 19.31 .31 .3. . «1.3123 mood. .mm an «.333. 00« as..— oo« oo. o q d d 3 d .8 u a s s . m. m. .1 r .fi 3. w 30.. .. m # llll l I “ 10>. .. H . on. >20.00<>.«0e «OUo\om.fl I «030— 91 .9": .G.E\HE mHH u 30am UOOHQ >HMGOHOO Gmmz .wouom mafiuomuucoo HMHDOflngnm> uwma u mU>A .musmmmum cowmsmuwm mnmaouoo u moon .mnsmmmum amaumuum Uflfimpmmm H mm .weouomm> Hmumm cooan Uflcmmoummwn £ua3 cofluma Iseflum uoummomuofimno Ufluoumo on mmcommmu Hmasomm> mnmcouoo mommm>¢ .NN musmflm 92 06mm: 33 '5'3'A'1 mm mnsmwm 3.329.330 .33.. .3. .3. . «2.3.3.3 no.1: 90« as... can 00— O N I I I ON... 1 . . .2... . . ‘ w w a. — a IOU‘ i a >Eo.oo<>.«o._ «OUo\oO— I «0.x.ON .m« a 28: o . o« u a s s .n l a m 3. u ”H 6 on. 93 changed from 7.45 to 109 mm Hg to 7.17 and 112 mm Hg, respectively. The heart rate remained constant (l4l/min). An additional parameter, the Q-T interval of the EKG, was monitored in the second heart study. Data from six animals showed no significant alteration of the lead II Q-T interval by any of the chemoreceptor stimuli. Gracilis--Hindpaw Table 6 presents the data from two animals showing the responses of the isolated, perfused hindpaw and gracilis muscle to perfusion of the carotid chemoreceptors with hypoxic- hypercapnic blood before and after vagotomy. The data show that systemic pressure, hindpaw and gracilis perfusion pres- sure are increased during chemoreceptor stimulation before and after vagotomy. Figure 23 is a representative tracing showing the responses of the hindpaw, gracilis muscle and systemic blood pressure to carotid chemoreceptor stimulation with hypoxic-hypercapnic blood after vagotomy. After a control period the isolated lung was ventilated with 0% O2 - 20% C02. As systemic arterial pressure rose, carotid sinus perfusion pressure was maintained as constant as possible.. Gracilis artery and cranial tibial artery perfusion pressure increased during stimulation. Upon returning to the control gas, sYstemic pressure, gracilis artery and paw perfusion pressure returned to control levels. 94 N N I mN NmH mNH HNH mm 00 wON I O we N N N# 000 u NH. mm. ma. OHH om on oo wwm . o mom . om mm. mm. mm. mm. Noo wow I No .0 m N m H. moo I wHH mva ONH mNH vma ADV OU de I O MON szBOUm> mm9m¢ no.n vm mm moa mmH HOH moo wow I No we m N N* 000 u so. mm 00. mo. mm on oo wmm I 0 wow 0... am mm. .m. mm. mm. Noo wow a No .0 N N H# woo .m.. 0.. mo. mm mm. mm. loo oo .mm u 0 wow NZOBOU¢> mmommm mo maaflomum 3mm m «o Aozoa omeaqomHv mm a . m m m m mmoetz wmoeaquzm> .cHE\HE Ha n 3oam oooan muwuum mflHHomum com: .cHE\HE mm H 30am woman swapcfln cmmz .pooHQ woman «0 mm H £m .mooan «scam ofluoumo mo coamcmu O u mom .muommoum wumunm «HHHomnm u «H flows m .musmmmum coflmsmuom 3mmocws u 3mmm .muommmnm Hmwumuum oaemumMm H mm .musmmmum «scflm ofluonmo u mom .MEo Iuomm> Hmumm 0cm mucumn pooHn UHcmmonmmzlonommn nufl3 COflumHSEH#m Hoummomu IOEmSO UfluOHmo on mHOmDE mflHHOMHm can 3mmpcfl£ UwHMHOmfl m0 mmmcomwwh mmwum>< .m GHQMB 3mm .musmmmum cowmomumm 3mmwawn u m waaaomum .ouommmum cosmomuwm mumuum «.HHomum n . . m .muommmum macflm ofluoumo u mom .wusmmwum HMHHmpHm anmumwm H mm .oooHn macflm mo mm H mm .pooHQ «scam ofluoumo mo :ofimcmu NO H Nom ..moo omnweouomm> 3 me oooan venomoummhnloflxomwn £ua3 coaumHSEfium HoummomHOEmno Ufluoumo ou mHomSE «Hafiomum com SmooCflg pmumHOmH mo mmmcommmu m>aumucmmonmmm 95 .MN musmfim 96 mm whomfim $3.5 OE“... « o v u o «« . . . . I . . . . I . . . I . I . I . . . Ll w .. i . I r r I 4 L‘ n 4 I, ,1 ll , N . . 4 . . . . . . . o . . . . o . . . . . 4 . . .. o . T s .3 .+ . J . V , M. . . . . . ., . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I . . . . . . a . l . u . m n . l a m . . i a m . . _ 4 . _ r . . H . . . . . . . . . . a . . . . . l. . is I '8“ _ . . . w . u i . _ h . . _ q R . . W A E . _ _ . . w P , u m . .L . _ 1... I... T... .. . w » I . TI» . II.— . . . » III—Ir-“ ..IL. 7.1. h ....... . .ILII .- r; v 7 IL _ ». . y . n . l I H 3.34.. w . . I" 1.. «.1144 . q, a, .4. . ~ .01. ‘1“ v I . . I o 4 4 4 - ¢ . d c. . g III. 9 . . . . . I .M 2. T 4 a , w . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 1,. & M l . A, . . . . _ . . . . . . , .x. 4 ,4 u , l .. . . . . . . . . . Y . . . . 4 . . . . i . “SEE. w . ‘ ., . . . . . . I o . . . . . . Ir». . a i .. a £55,... .33? A .(u. . 5 u. _~ . . . . ,. h . ; . . , . . . . ,. f .l p . . . . . _ . . . . ,V i l V . . . . . I . . . . r w . l . _ . w _ l _ I _ . , 97 Table 7 presents the results from the three animals in the second series of hindpaw studies in which the skin of the hindpaw was circumferentially sectioned and the cranial tibial arteries perfused. Hindpaw perfusion pressure did not appear to change during stimulation before vagotomy and only increased slightly following vagotomy. The results from the two animals in the third series of studies are presented in Table 8. In this series the hindpaw Skin remained intact and the paw was perfused through the cranial tibial artery. The data show that the systemic pres- sure and paw perfusion pressure increased during chemoreceptor 8timulation before and after vagotomy. Figure 24 is a repre- sentative record of the responses from the third series of hindpaw studies. Before vagotomy, ventilation of the isolated lung with 0% O2 - 20% CO2 produced increases in systemic pres- mare and paw perfusion pressure. Ventilation with the same gas mixture following vagotomy produced a greater increase in SYfitemic pressure and paw perfusion pressure. Ventilation with 10% O2 - 10% CO produced a lesser degree of hypoxic- 2 hYPeJ’mapnia. This induced a smaller increase in systemic Pressure and paw perfusion pressure. I.IIVJXAUAIDF- II1<1I N N wo.o ow wo omw .o. oo wow I o wo w w m. com o... www mo oww mow foo oo wmw I 0 wow I mw wow wow omw woo wow I wo wo ww woo w I w I mww oww .m. .ow loo oo www I 0 wow I ow mo ow. mww woo wow I wo wo o I oow oo wow ow. loo oo www I 0 wow wzoeoow> mmemw % oo.o ow m. omw oow woo wow I wo wo ow woo . w . w om . wo m. oww oow foo oo www I 0 wow I Hw om. w.w wow woo wow I wo wo ww woo w w I oww mow .ow mow foo oo www I 0 wow I ow mo wow oow woo wow I wo wo a. mom N N N I oo. ow wm. oow foo oo www I 0 wow wzoooo<> mmowmm mo wo , snot. . m . mo .ozoq omomqomwo a o m m mmoexwz wmoequazm> .cws\ws Ho u so.“ ocean zmmocfln com: .UooHn msoflm mo mm H mm .Uooan «Doom ofluoumo mo cowmcmu No R NQm .musmmmum «zoom vapoumo IOonm>s cuwz cowumHoEHum .musmmmum commsmumm BudwaJ H .II. hum . Hoummo 3QO .mHSmmmum amoumuum Uflfimumhm H mm was? .3... 2.. 383 oooE Biomass... QHOEQSU UHHOHMU OH mmaDQmmH .SflQUQflQ DmMmeme .N GHQQE 99 N N oo.o ww mow oow oww oo wow I o wo w w ww coo oo.. wo wow wow wow woo oo www I 0 wow . w w mo . ww wow .ow oww oo wow I o wo w N w ww woo om.o .o omw oww Iowwl woo oo www I 0 wow wzoooo¢> mmemw wo.. ww oww oow wmw woo wow I wo wo w I w ww woo .o.o www oow omw mmw woo oo www I 0 wow . w w oo o ow mww mmw www oo wow I o wo w w ww coo wm.. oow wow www www woo oo wmw I 0 wow wzoooo<> mmommm wo 3mm m mo Aozow omewwomwo mm m m m m mmooxwz wmoewwwezm> .cws\we ow u sown woomh monocwn :mmz .ooown mocwm mo mm H mm .Uoown moowm owuowmo mo cowmcmp o n om .mwommmwm comeMme meocwn H mm .wwommmwm wmwwmuwm owEmumhm H mm .mwomwmum mocwm Uwpowmo u mum .mEouomm> Hmwmm pom mwommn UOOwn owcmmowmmms Iowxoowo awws ooflwwHoEwwm wooqooowoeoxo wmwowwo ow ooooomow swowcmx wowwooq .m oNme .mwommmwm comeMHmm 3mmpcw£ "33¢ m .mwommmum mocwm Uwuowmo u mum .oHSmmmwm wmwwmuwm owEmpmmm H mm .UOOwQ mocwm mo mm H mm .oOOHQ mocwm owuowmo mo cowmcmw No n mom 100 .mEouomm> wmumm pom mwomwn UOOHQ owcmmoummmnlowxomwa nuw3 cowumw ISEwum HoummomHoEozo owuowmo on mmcommmu 3mmocw£ m>wumwcmmmnmmm ‘1 «a Irlmcw .ow musmwm 101 vm mnsmwm 5.52.... V N O Q N 0 ,Q N o III I «I ..w w w m . , o w w . I I.I w w m M w M f w w w m Im « m M w w w L m m M u m a .w w w m M H n w m H m _ M w . w M N . , w . . I V . . . o . . . I m, . . . . . w o o m . 4 11L % I . m t . . . w w . n , . m Q I but... .11.. o w . . o . . . ,I I,: 1..I . I lg . . , . , , ,V . . . 1 h .7 . . . . . . . . 1. _. o ..., m2; . . . . .. wt, . I L , _ . , , h . .. I . I . . . v I .. I ..... I . I I . w o . II I I II , a o , _ o ,, _ , , . 1 . III, .II. . a 7 . , . H FIII u . . I N » Il IIIIIIL _v w . . w w . , . 1111 I a . . . . .411. I , 1 114 n n , . 1 I . . . . .. .II . i=_l-_ . 1 w , . . . .I . 4 I I II. I , . o I .w I .9. I . . .III. I I '8“ 1. . .I I-.. I. II .. L . . . . III . .I.IIIIII; .. .I . I H . I. q. I . 4 ..... I. w . . . w w w w . w , . _ w I .I I . {I It «.11 I. .III I I41 I III 4 I I I . IL . 42.14. 411. 1 . . , I 1 , 1 , . . . i _ H H , . n , . o . . , V , . . . . I , 1 . , _ _, , 1 . _ ,, . . w ,, , 1 . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . o . .11. .. . i. 3.111. . .. I ,. 1M .III1. 11.11. 1.. ., I. fl .. . ..... .41. a 1?... ...... . I.I. . .q. . . I . I . . . ,. I.1 I III. I N 1.. . . 1 _ , I 1 I, , n . o _ w _ , H . 1,_, . . , ., I I.. . ., r . . 1 I . . . . I 1 . . .. . . . . . ... , a _ . , 4 rnr: . .. r . , . w , . o I . , . , . o o . 4 II I! 1 4 . . , , , _ . _ , , , , , . . , . , H ,, , n , H o 1, 1 ,V . . . w . . . . .,: .1 .. _., o w . . . . ,. . . . h M ., . . . . h. ,. f .. : .: . h ..1 .. . 7.. . , I .11. . a . . . . 1" . n . 1. #1.. ...: 1,. .. _ , , I m fl 1M , , . n I . ,, , , 1 I , , _ . , ,, , o o . ..... . . . I .u v V ,. . .._ .. . . .. . I ..Iw1. 1“ . . . I o . I . A . . . . . . . .I.I“ . .11 u , . H _ . o u n , , o , . ~ " , n a ,. n , , L N . q . . T . . . I? ... . . . . . I. L . . . I . .I . 1. . . . . . I. .. w I l . . . _ . . . A ,, . 1 , . _ . , . . . V . . . , o d . ” w , u _ . . . . at . . .11. . . . I 1.. . I .1 1..- I. L ...I. . . 1.. . . . , _ . . . . . _ 2.. z..- I . . I . I. I I I LII.EI~I1L I I .a a _. IuII . u I. I «I . I I .I T......... I . u w :— YIIu.2.124.141.4511 . .1 w I . w: w . . ., I34...IMI...«.IIuII,..11IIIAI . w. ,_ w .7“? A w a . a....¢..II.,... I.II...“ JJIIIIHIIIJIZI . . , I . _ H u H . w w 1 . . , V 1 n , . . , o W l , , . , . . . w I . m . . . . . . . . . I. III. . I . . [c I ,, , . , . I . . . u . ._ . . . I . . I x I A . I I I . _ , . . . . 3.1. . . ... ...... . . . A .I . . . . I , . . .. . . . .... . I . _.. . . . . .., 1. . . ”1., . ....... . u . . . . Z . I. . .1 . I. .I. . . . . . . . .I . . . . . . I . I “axes” Mm» 00K . V‘s}... «« 3. 2 8 «« 8.".oa 2.. «v... «as A «00930. «00.38 «00.3.8 «0005.? «0:00. «0.30 U «0.x... «0.5.3 .. §§h§ >§§h§ >33: DISCUSSION Carotid body stimulation by hypoxic-hypercapnic blood before vagotomy increased vascular resistance in the kidney but caused no change in resistance in the forelimb, intes- tine or coronary vasculature (Table 9). After vagotomy, lrypoxic, hypercapnic and hypoxic—hypercapnic stimulation of tflne carotid bodies increased vascular resistance in the fore- llimb, intestine and kidney but not in the heart. Systemic earterial pressure increased during hypoxic-hypercapnic chemo- Ineceptor stimulation before vagotomy and increased after ‘lagotomy during stimulation with hypoxia, hypoxic-hypercapnia iind hypercapnia;- Heart rate was not consistently affected by <2hemoreceptor stimulation either before or after vagotomy. This study differs from other investigations of the Ireflex vascular effects of carotid chemoreceptor stimulation ii) that selective, physiologic stimuli were applied to the ilinervated carotid bodies rather than to the entire animal. Selective stimulation was accomplished by varying the oxygen iind carbon dioxide tension of autologous blood perfusing the <2arotid sinuses. This was done by means of an extracorporeal 2 and CO2 gas mixtures. The uSe of this approach probably results in peripheral responses ILUng ventilated with various 0 102 103 .AmcoHHm>Hmmno omHHmm How ummu H m.ucm©Dumv mmcmno HCMOHMHcmHm oz: .AmmUCMHHm> Hmswmcs cam mcoHum>Hmmno @mHHmmcs How @mHMHUoE ummv u m.H:m©:Hmv mmsam> mmCUHx .m> mo.ouvm .AmGOHHm>meno cmHHmm How ummu u m.ucmwsumv mo.ouvm« .mm H mammE mum mmsam> I *v.mH H n.vv «m.m H v.5H +Hm.m H m.m NOU mom I NC mom I «m.ma H m.bv +¥m.m H H.ma +Ho.v H m.m NOU wm I NO we I Hm.mH H m.mo «m.ma H m.mm +«o.n H N.HN NOU wow I NC mo w20900¢> mm5m4 MUZ¢BmHmmm m 2H m02¢m0 Bzmommm I «N.HN H 0.0m +o.v H m.v +m.m H m.v NOD mom I NO mo MZOBOO¢> mmommm mUZ ZH mOZHOHmHHHGm> .weouomm> kumm flaw muomwn GOHHMHSEHHm HoummomHoEmco UHHOHMO mcHst mUmQ HmHDUmm> mumcouoo cam mmCUHx .EdeH .QEHHwHow CH mocmumflmwu unasomm> CH mmcmco .m mNQma 104 which are more representative of chemoreceptor induced reSpon- ses in the intact animal than responses evoked by unilateral carotid sinus perfusion (46), or bilateral perfusion with heterologous blood (21) or pharmacologic agents (46). The importance of using a bilateral preparation is suggested by the work of Sagawa and Watanabe (56) showing that impulses generated in the left and right carotid sinus nerves during baroreceptor stimulation summate in the central nervous system. It is possible that ligation of both internal carotid arteries in the surgical preparation reduced the blood flow to the central vasomotor areas (57,58). However, Green and Rapela (75) reported that because of the extensive collateral blood supply provided by the vertebral arteries, bilateral common carotid artery occlusion did not lower vertebral artery perfusion pressure more than to about 90% of systemic arterial pressure. The use of the carotid sinus perfusion circuit containing an isolated lung has two advantages over procedures previously employed to determine the effects of carotid body chemorecep- tor stimulation. First, the method allows the use of auto- loqous blood and eliminates the necessity of using stagnated blood or non-physiologic perfusates. Second, it permits rapid Changes in local blood gas content without detectable changes in systemic blood gas concentrations. Normal systemic blood 9&8 content is maintained because the blood leaving the sinus Pelffusion circuit is returned to the animal's venous 105 circulation via the jugular vein. Since the volume of blood flowing through the perfusion circuit is relatively small, amounting to less than 5% of the animal's cardiac output, abnormalities in the 02 and CO2 content of the blood are cor- rected during passage through the animal's pulmonary circula- tion. While many investigators have reported the reflex responses to carotid chemoreceptor stimulation few studies have employed selective carotid body stimulation. This makes a comparison of the data inappropriate since alteration of the systemic O2 and CO2 blood gas content could produce a combination of three effects: 1) local vascular effects (60, 62-64), 2) reflex vascular effects due to central nervous sys- tem chemoreceptor stimulation (4), and 3) reflex effects due to peripheral arterial chemoreceptor stimulation (4). Of the few studies in which selective carotid chemoreceptor stimu- lation was used, most employed pharmacologic or non-physio- logic rather than physiologic stimuli which also renders a strict comparison with our findings inappropriate. The comparison of results is also complicated by the use of different anesthetics. Some investigators employ chlora- lose anesthesia (23,40,42,46) while we employed pentobarbital anesthesia in the present study. Pentobarbital is reported to depress centrally mediated reflexes while chloralose exag- gerates these reflexes (52)° Recently, Cox (73,74) compared the influences of chloralose and pentobarbital anesthesia on 106 cardiovascular function in the dog. The results showed chlora- lose anesthesia to produce no change in systemic hemodynamics. The heart rate responses to hypotension and hypertension were exaggerated. The results showed that the only hemodynamic effects of pentobarbital anesthesia were a significant increase in heart rate and slight decrease in stroke volume. Pento- barbital depressed smooth muscle reactivity and reduced the sensitivity of the peripheral mechanoreceptor reflexes. The effects of carotid chemoreceptor stimulation were studies before and following vagotomy. This was done in order to determine the role of the carotid chemoreceptors without the reflex buffering influences of the aortic baroreceptors and chemoreceptors. Efforts were made to maintain a constant perfusion pressure in the carotid sinuses to prevent excita- tion of the carotid sinus baroreceptors. The rise in vascular resistance, during chemoreceptor stimulation, observed in the kidney before vagotomy and in the forelimb, intestine and kidney following vagotomy appears to be the result of active changes in blood vessel caliber. An active change is indicated since resistance rose concomi— tant with an increased transmural pressure which would favor a passive decrease in vascular resistanceo Increases in vascular resistance might have been augmented by increases in blood viscosity via changes in hematocrit subsequent to splenic discharge. The present findings suggest that carotid chemoreceptor stimulation results in responses that are 107 mediated over sympathetic nerves with a contribution from increases in circulating catecholamines. The possibility of a withdrawal of parasympathetic activity can be ruled out since only a small proportion of the resistance vessels of the body receive parasympathetic innervation (70). Therefore, its effect on total vascular resistance is small. Sympathoadrenal mediation is indicated by the time course of the response to chemoreceptor stimulation. The rise in systemic arterial pressure and organ perfusion pressure concurrent with the change in blood gas tension, as indicated by the sinus P02, suggests a neurogenic constrictor response. Frequently, a distinct secondary rise in pressure was observed. This was attributed to an increase in circulating catecholamines subse- quent to adrenal discharge. The increases in vascular resistance in the forelimb and intestine following vagotomy were similar in magnitude. However, the kidney vasculature appeared to be the most re- sponsive to chemoreceptor stimulation of all of the vascular beds studied. Haddy and Scott (71) showed a greater sensitiv- ity in the kidney to the systemic administration of epine- phrine and norepinephrine than in the intestine or hindlimb. The greater responsiveness of the kidney could be related to an augmenting pressor action of angiotension subsequent to the release of renin. Vander (72) reported direct electrical Stimulation of renal nerves and intravenous infusions of 108 norepinephrine and epinephrine, while keeping aortic pressure constant, to increase renin release from the kidney. The responses evoked from the forelimb, kidney and intes- tinal vasculature during carotid chemoreceptor stimulation are directionally similar to the responses induced by carotid sinus hypotension. In the present study, a 30% increase in renal vascular resistance was produced when carotid sinus perfusion pressure was reduced from 102 to 47 mm Hg. Similar- ly, Fronek (65) reported increased mesenteric artery re- sistance during carotid sinus hypotension. DiSalvo et al. (59) reported increases in forelimb skin (56%) and muscle (31%) vascular resistances when perfusion pressure in the_ isolated carotid sinuses was reduced from 108 to 59 mm Hg. Brachial and cephalic venous outflows in the forelimb study,twhere total limb inflow was constant, showed no change from control during chemoreceptor stimulation. The absence of a change in brachial and cephalic venous outflows during the increase in forelimb vascular resistance indicates that the muscle and skin vascular beds contributed about equally to the increase in forelimb resistance. Calvelo gt El- reported increased vascular resistance in the gracilis muscle during carotid chemoreceptor stimulation with nicotine and cyanide. However, they reported that chemoreceptor stimula- tion induced vasodilation in the hindpaw (skin) that was unchanged or augmented by pharmacologic alpha blockade. This response in the skin vasculature is different from the results 109 obtained in the present work in which only constriction was seen. These differences could be explained if we failed to separate the skin and muscle in the forelimb. To test this possibility we employed an isolated skin and muscle prepara- tion in the hindlimb similar to that used by Calvelo gt 3l° (23). The results of these preliminary studies confirmed the vasoconstriction in skin. The discrepancy in these reports has yet to be resolved and could possibly be related to the anesthesia employed, that is, pentobarbital versus chlora- lose.l The responses of the coronary vasculature to carotid chemoreceptor stimulation were investigated in two studies. One study examined the responses to stimulation with the hypoxic, hypoxic-hypercapnic and hypercapnic stimuli employed in the previous studies on the forelimb, intestine and kidney. The second study examined the reSponses of the coro- nary vasculature to chemoreceptor stimulation with blood that was less hypoxic, less hypoxic-hypercapnic or less hypercapnic than was employed in the first study. Carotid chemoreceptor stimulation before and following vagotomy produced no consis- tent changes in coronary vascular resistance. Hackett gt El. (46) recently reported reflex coronary vasodilation during 1In one experiment, using the same hindpaw preparation and anesthetic as that employed by_Calvelo gt El° we again observed vasoconstriction in skin during chemoreceptor stimula- tion. 110 carotid chemoreceptor stimulation with nicotine and cyanide, and during carotid sinus nerve stimulation. Ventricular pacing and AY-21,011 (a myocardio-selective beta-receptor antagonist) were used to minimize the chronotrOpic and ino- tr0pic responses to chemoreceptor stimulation. They reported that the intravenous administration of atropine blocked the reflex coronary dilator response and proposed the efferent pathway mediating the response to be through vagal cholinergic fibers. This difference in findings might be attributable to a differing response to physiologic versus pharmacologic chemoreceptor stimulation. DiSalvo 32 El. (61) reported no change in coronary vascular resistance in a natural flow coro- nary preparation when pressure in the isolated carotid sinuses was lowered from 87 to 48 mm Hg. Since our data indicate no consistent change in coronary vascular resistance during carotid body stimulation concomi- tant with a fall in left ventricular contractile force, it appears that factors which produce vasoconstriction acted along with those producing vasodilation. The factors favoring vaso- constriction in this constant coronary blood flow preparation include 1) a decreased vasodilator metabolite concentration due to a fall in heart metabolism as indicated by the fall in ventricular contractile force (62) (the change in contractile force will be discussed in detail later), 2) a myogenic vaso- constriction (Bayliss effect) in response to an increased transmural pressure resulting from a fall in extravascular lll pressure subsequent to a decrease in contractile force (66, 67), and 3) a decreased sympathetic tone to the heart (66). The factors favoring vasodilation include 1) an increase in circulating catecholamines and 2) a passive increase in vessel caliber due to a falluin extravascular pressure result- ing from a decreased ventricular contractile force. The lack of a response in coronary resistance suggests that the above factors balance out to produce no net change. The decrease in left ventricular contractile force ob- served during chemoreceptor stimulation was greater following vagotomy than before. DeGeest gt il’ (48) reported that hypoxic chemoreceptor stimulation before vagotomy diminished left ventricular contractile force in the paced, isovolu- metric heart. However, they found the negative inotrOpic effect elicited by chemoreceptor stimulation to be abolished by cervical vagotomy suggesting mediation mainly by vagal pathways. Downing et_al. (43) have also reported a decreased left ventricular contractility during hypoxic carotid chemo— receptor stimulation following vagotomy, however, these investigators did not study contractility before vagotomy. These investigators suggest the diSparity in findings to be due to possible differences in the magnitude of concomitant excitation of the respiratory and vasomotor centers during chemoreceptor stimulation. They reported that, after vagotomy, it is likely that a diminution of sympathetic tone represents 112 the primary cardiac reflex effect of carotid chemoreceptor stimulation. Excitation of the respiratory centers resulting from chemoreceptor stimulation also tends to increase cardiac sympathetic activity thus producing a secondary cardiac ef- fect. They conclude that in some cases the secondary cardiac effects due to reSpiratory center excitation may predominate over the primary cardiac effect of chemoreceptor stimulation. Hackett gt El° (61) reported an increase in left ventricular dP/dt during unilateral carotid chemoreceptor stimulation with nicotine and cyanide before and after vagotomy. This difference in findings might again be attributable to a dif- fering response to physiologic versus pharmacologic chemo- receptor stimulation. While the data from these studies indicate a sympatho- adrenal mediated vasoconstriction in the peripheral vascula- ture, the results indicate a concomitant selective diminution of sympathetic tone to the heart. Mechanical factors in the heart could have contributed to the decrease in ventricular contractile force produced by carotid chemoreceptor stimulation. A diminished cardiac sympathetic tone could have been augmented by an increase in afterload of the heart since systemic pressure increased as contractile force fell. Heart rate was measured during chemoreceptor stimulation before and after vagotomy in all experiments. The data indi- cated no consistent changes in heart rate during chemoreceptor 113 stimulation with any of the experimental gas miXtures. These results differ from the findings of many investigators (39,40-43),48) using a similar preparation with controlled ventilation. When respiration is controlled, carotid chemo- receptor stimulation produced bradycardia. Daly and Scott (40) and Downing (42) prOposed that the primary reflex effect of carotid chemoreceptor stimulation on heart rate is a vagally induced bradycardia. This reflex bradycardia can be over-ridden by secondary mechanisms evoked by concomitant increases in respiration, changes in arterial pressure and circulating catecholamines (40,42,55). Since we held ventil- atory rate and volume constant our findings on heart rate could be due to the type of anesthetic employed. Daly and Scott (40) and Downing (42) used chloralose anesthesia while our work was carried out with pentobarbital. Carotid chemoreceptor stimulation with combined hypoxia and hypercapnia following vagotomy caused a greater increase in forelimb, intestine and kidney vascular resistance than was produced by hypoxia or hypercapnia alone (Table 9). Hypoxia-hypercapnic blood caused a 26% increase in forelimb vascular resistance while hypoxic or hypercapnic blood alone increased resistance by 12% and 11%, respectively. Before vagotomy, hypoxic-hypercapnic chemoreceptor stimulation in- creased renal vascular resistance by 56%. Following vagotomy, hypoxic-hypercapnic stimulation caused a 69% increase in renal resistance, while hypoxia and hypercapnia alone increased 114 resistance by 48% and 45%, respectively. Similarly, combined hypoxic-hypercapnic chemoreceptor stimulation caused a 33% increase in ileal vascular resistance, while hypoxia alone increased resistance by 13% and hypercapnia increased resistance by 17%. The rise in systemic arterial pressure during carotid chemoreceptor stimulation may have resulted either from an increase in total peripheral resistance or cardiac output or a combination of both. Since cardiac output was not measured in this study it was not possible to determine total peri- pheral resistance. The reflex buffering effect produced by the aortic baro- and chemoreceptors probably attenuated the rise in systemic pressure before vagotomy. Although intes- tinal, skin and muscle vascular resistance was unchanged during chemoreceptor stimulation before vagotomy, kidney re- sistance was markedly elevated. Increases in resistance in other vascular beds which were not measured may also have con- tributed to a rise in total peripheral resistance. Following vagotomy, a rise in resistance in the intestine, kidney, skin and muscle also contributes to the rise in peripheral resistance during chemoreceptor stimulation. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS The purpose of this study was to determine the reflex effects of selective, physiologic stimulation of the carotid body chemoreceptors on the vascular resistance of the fore- limb, kidney, intestine and heart. Selective physiologic chemoreceptor stimulation was accomplished by varying the gas content of autologous blood perfusing the isolated carotid sinuses by means of an extracorporeal lung ventilated with various O2 and CO2 gas mixtures. The reflex responses to carotid chemoreceptor stimula- tion were studied in the dog before and following vagotomy. Systemic arterial pressure increased during chemoreceptor stimulation with hypoxic-hypercapnic blood before vagotomy. Following vagotomy, systemic pressure increased during carotid body stimulation with hypoxic, hypoxic-hypercapnic and hyper- capnic blood. Carotid chemoreceptor stimulation with hypoxic- hypercapnic blood before vagotomy increased vascular resistance in the kidney but caused no change in resistance in the forelimb, intestine or coronary vasculature. After vagot- omy, hypoxic, hypoxic-hypercapnic and hypercapnic chemoreceptor stimulation increased vascular resistance in the forelimb, intestine and kidney but not in the heart. 115 116 During hypoxic-hypercapnic chemoreceptor stimulation following vagotomy vascular resistance in the kidney in- creased 69% while forelimb and ileal resistance increased 26% and 33%, respectively. The absence of a change in skeletal muscle and skin blood flow in the forelimb prepara- tion indicated that the skin and muscle vascular beds contributed about equally to the increase in forelimb resis- tance. To further examine the effects of chemoreceptor stimulation on the skin and skeletal muscle vasculature a . I . gracilis muscle and hindpaw preparation was employed. The E—j results of these preliminary studies indicated vasoconstric- tion in muscle and skin during hypoxic-hypercapnic chemo- receptor stimulation. The rise in vascular resistance observed in the kidney before vagotomy and in the forelimb, intestine and kidney following vagotomy appeared to be the result of active changes in blood vessel caliber. The responses appear to be mediated over sympathetic nerves with a contribution from increased circulating catecholamines. Changes in left ventricular contractile force during chemoreceptor stimulation were measured in a heart preparation having a constant coronary blood flow. Left ventricular contractile force decreased during chemoreceptor stimulation before and after vagotomy but larger reductions in contractile force were observed following vagotomy. The decrease in contractile force appears to be primarily the result of a 117 diminished sympathetic tone to the heart possibly augmented by an increased afterload. Heart rate was not consistently affected by chemoreceptor stimulation either before or following vagotomy. These studies suggest that carotid body chemoreceptor stimulation increases systemic arterial pressure in part by In-ULL - I . ' -—. increasing total peripheral resistance. The studies also indicate that hypoxia and hypercapnia act on the carotid body chemoreceptors to elicit changes in autonomic outflow to the vasculature similar to changes induced by lowering the pres- sure in the carotid sinuses. BIBLIOGRAPHY 10. BIBLIOGRAPHY Chungcharoen, D., M. deB. Daly, and A. Schweitzer. The blood supply of the carotid body in cats, dogs, and rabbits. J. Physiol. (London) 117:347, 1952. DeCastro, F. Sur la structure de la synapse dans 1es chemorecepteurs: leur mechanisme d'excitation at role dans la arculation sanguine locale. Acta Physiol. Scand. 22:14, 1951. Daly, M. deB., C. J. Lambertsen and A. Schweitzer. Observations of the volume of blood flow and oxygen utilization of the carotid body of the cat. J. Physiol. (London) 125:67, 1954. Heymans, C., and E. Neil. Reflexogenic Areas of the Cardiovascular System. London, Churchill, 1958. Biscoe, T. J., M. J. Purves, and S. R. Sampson. The frequency of nerve impulses in single carotid body ~qhemoreceptor afferent fibers recorded in vivo with intact circulation. J. Physiol. (LondoHT 208:121-131, 1970. Eyzaguirre, C. and J. Lewin. Effect of different oxygen tensions on the carotid body in vitro. J. Physiol. (London) 159:238-250, 1961. Landgren, S. and E. Neil. Chemoreceptor impulse activity following hemorrhage. Acta Physiol. Scand. 23:158-167, 1951. Hornbein, T. F., The relation between stimulus to chemo- receptors and their responses. In: Arterial Chemo— receptors, edited by R. W. Torrance. Oxford, Blackwell Scientific publications, 1968. Duke, H. N., J. H. Green and E. Neil. Carotid chemo- receptor activity during inhalation of carbon monoxide mixtures. J. Physiol. (London) 118:520-527, 1952. Comroe, J. H. Physiology of ReSpiration. Chicago, Year Book Medical Publishers Incorporated, 1969. 118 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 119 Comroe, J. H. and C. F. Schmidt. The part played by reflexes from the carotid body in the chemical regula- tion of reSpiration in the dog. Am. J. Physiol. 121:75-79, 1938. Eyzaguirre, C. and J. Lewin. Chemoreceptor activity of the carotid body of the cat. J. Physiol. (London) 159:222-237, 1961. Eyzaguirre, C. and J. Lewin. Effect of different oxygen tensions on the carotid body in vitro. J. Physiol. (London) 159:238-250, 1961. Biscoe, T. J. and R. A. Millar. Inhalation anaesthetics and systemic chemoreceptor activity. J. Physiol. (London) 182:24P, 1966. Hornbein, T. F. and A. Roos. Specificity of H ion con- centration as a carotid chemoreceptor stimulus. J. Appl. Physiol. 18:580-584, 1963. Joels, N. and E. Neil. Chemoreceptor impulse activity evoked by perfusion of the glomus at various FCC and pH values. J. Physiol. (London) 154:7P, 1968. Eyzaguirre, C. and H. Koyano. Effects of hypoxia, hyper- capnia, and pH on the chemoreceptor activity of the carotid body in vitro. J. Physiol. (London) 178: 385-409, 1965. Gray, B. A. Response of the perfused carotid body to changes in pH and P . Resp. Physiol. 4:229-245, 1968 C02 McCloskey, D. I. Carbon dioxide and the carotid body. In: Arterial Chemoreceptors, Edited by R. W. Torrance. Oxford, Blackwell Scientific Publications, 1968. Travis, D. M. Molecular C02 is inert on carotid chemo- receptor: Demonstration by inhibition of carbonic anhydrase. J. Pharm and Exptl Ther. 178:529, 1971. Pelletier, C. L. and J. T. Shepherd. Venous responses to stimulation of carotid chemoreceptors by hypoxia and hypercapnia. Am. J. Physiol. 223:97-103, 1972. Biscoe, T. J. Carotid body: structure and function. Physiol. Rev. 51:437-495, 1971. 23. 24. 25. 26. 27. 28. 29. 30. 31. 32. 33. 120 Calvelo, M. G., F. M. Abboud, D. R. Ballard and W. Abdel- Sayed. Reflex vascular responses to stimulation of chemoreceptors with nicotine and cyanide. Circ. Res. 27:259-276, 1970. Bernthal, T. and F. J. Schwind. A comparison in intes- tine and leg of the reflex vascular response to carotid-aortic chemoreceptor stimulation. Am. J. Physiol. 143:361-372, 1945. Winder, C. V., T. Bernthal and W. F. Weeks. Reflex f‘** hyperpnea and vasoconstriction due to ischemic excita- tion of the carotid body. Am. J. Physiol. 124:238- 245, 1938. Korner, P. I. and J. B. Uther. Dynamic characteristics of the cardiovascular autonomic effects during severe arterial hypoxia in the unanesthetized rabbit. Circ. Res. 24:671, 1969. Jacobs, L., S. R. Sampson and J. H. Comroe, Jr. Carotid sinus versus carotid body origin of nicotine and cyanide bradycardia in the dog. Am. J. Physiol. 220: 472-476, 1971. Bernthal, T. Chemo-reflex control of vascular reactions through the carotid body. Am. J. Physiol. 121:1-20, 1938. Bernthal, T., H. F. Motley, F. J. Schwind and W. F. Weeks. The efferent pathway of chemoreflex vasomotor reactions arising from the carotid body. Am. J. Physiol. 143:220-225, 1945. Litwin, J., A. H. Dil, and D. M. Aviado. Effects of anoxia on the vascular resistance of the dog's hind- limb. Circ. Res. 8:585-593, 1960. Comroe, J. H., Jr., and L. Mortimer. The reSpiratory and cardiovascular responses to temporally separated aortic and carotid bodies to cyanide, nicotine, phenyldiguanide and serotonin. J. Pharm. Exptl. Ther. 146:33, 1964. Caldwell, F. T., D. Rolf and H. L. White. Effects of acute hypoxia on the renal circulation in man. J. Appl. Physiol. 1:597, 1949. Franklin, K. J., L. E. McGee and E. A. Ullman. Effects of severe asphyxia on the kidney and urine flow. J. Physiol. (London) 112:43, 1951. 34. 35. 36. 37. 38. 39. 40. 41. 42. 43. 44. 121 Korner, P. I. Effects of low oxygen and of carbon monoxide on the renal circulation in unanesthetized rabbits. Circ. Res. 12:361-374, 1963. Von Euler, U. S. and G. Liljestrand. Influence of oxygen inhalation on the chemoreceptor activity of the sinus region. Acta Physiol. Scand. 4:34-44, 1942. Whitehorn, W. V., A. Edelmann and F. A. Hitchcock. The cardiovascular responses to the breathing of 100 per cent oxygen at normal barometric pressure. Am. J. Physiol. 146:61-65, 1946. Dripps, R. D. and J. H. Comroe. The effect of the inhalation of high and low oxygen concentrations on respiration, pulse rate, ballistocardiogram and arterial oxygen saturation (oximeter) of normal individuals. Am. J. Physiol. 149:277-291, 1947. Alveryd, A. and S. Brody. Cardiovascular and respira- tory changes in man during oxygen breathing. Acta Physiol. Scand. 15:140-149, 1948. Bernthal, T., W. Greene and A. M. Revzin. Role of carotid chemoreceptors in hypoxic cardiac acceleration. Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med. 76:121, 1951. Daly, M. deB., and M. J. Scott. The effects of stimula- tion of the carotid body chemoreceptors on the heart rate of the dog. J. Physiol. (London) 144:148-166, 1958. Daly, M. deB. and M. J. Scott. Role of the chemorecep- tors in the cardiovascular responses to systemic hypoxia in the dog. J. Physiol. (London) 154:6P, 1960. Daly, M. deB. and M. J. Scott. An analysis of the primary reflex effects of stimulation of the carotid body chemo- receptors in the dog. J. Physiol. (London) 162:555-573, 1962. Downing, S. E., J. P. Remensnyder and J. H. Mitchell. Cardiovascular responses to hypoxic stimulation of the carotid bodies. Circ. Res. 10:676, 1962. Stern, S. and E. Rapaport. Comparison of the reflexes elicited from combined or separate stimulation of aortic and carotid chemoreceptors on myocardial contractility, cardiac output and systemic resistance. Circ. Res. 20:214-227, 1967. 45. 46. 47. 48. 49. 50. 51. 52. 54. 55. 56. 57. 122 Vatner, S. F., D. Franklin, R. L. VanCitters and E. Braunwald. Effects of carotid sinus nerve stimulation on the coronary circulation of the conscious dog. Circ. Res. 27:11-21, 1970. Hackett, J. G., F. M. Abboud, A. L. Mark, P. G. Schmid and D. D. Heistad. Coronary vascular responses to stimulation of chemoreceptors and baroreceptors. Circ. Res. 31:8-17, 1972. Krasney, J. A. Regional circulatory responses to arterial hypoxia in the anesthetized dog. Am. J. Physiol. 220:699-704, 1971. DeGeest, H., M. N. Levy and H. Zieske. Carotid chemo- receptor stimulation and ventricular performance. Am. J. Physiol. 209:564-570, 1965. Downing, S. E. Neural regulation of circulation during hypoxia and acidosis with special reference to the newborn. Fed. Proc. 3:1209-1218, 1972. Joels, N., and M. Samueloff. The activity of the medul- lary centres in diffusion respiration. J. Physiol. London 133:360-372, 1956. Imperial, E. S., M. N. Levy and H. Zieske. Outflow resistance as an independent determinant of cardiac performance. Circ. Res. 9:1148-1154, 1961. DiPalma, J. R., editor. Drill's Pharmacology in Medicine. McGraw-Hill, New York, 1965. Salem, H., M. Penna and D. M. Aviado. Mechanism for bradycardia arising from stimulation of the carotid bodies. Arch. Intern. Pharmacodyn. 150:249-258, 1964. Anitchkov, S. V., E. I. Malyghina, A. N. Poskalenko and V. E. Ryzhenkov. Reflexes from the carotid bodies upon the adrenals. Arch. Intern. Pharmacodyn. 129: 156-165, 1960. Sagawa, K. and K. Watanabe. Summation of bilateral carotid sinus signals in the barostatis reflex. Am. J. Physiol. 209:1278-1280, 1965. Milnor, W. R. Blood supply of special regions. In: Medical Physiology, edited by V. B. Mountcastle. Mosby, St. Louis, 1968, Vol. I, pp. 221-227. 58. 59. 60. 61. 62. 63. 64. 65. 66. 67. 68. 69. 123 Miller, M. E., G. C. Christensen, and H. E. Evans. Anatomy of the dog. W. B. Saunders Co., Philadelphia, 1968. DiSalvo, J., P. E. Parker, J. B. Scott and F. J. Haddy. Carotid baroreceptor influence on total and segmental resistances in skin and muscle vasculatures. Am. J. Physiol. 220:1970-1978, 1971. Daugherty, R. M., Jr., J. B. Scott and F. J. Haddy. Effects of generalized hypoxemia and hypercapnia on forelimb vascular resistance. Am. J. Physiol. 213: 1111-1114, 1967. DiSalvo, J., P. E. Parker, J. B. Scott and F. J. Haddy. Carotid baroreceptor influence on coronary vascular resistance in the anesthetized dog. Am. J. Physiol. 221:156—160, 1971. Haddy, F. J. and J. B. Scott. Metabolically linked vasoactive chemicals in local regulation of blood flow. Physiol. Rev. 48:688-707, 1968. Scott, J. B., R. M. Daugherty, Jr., J. M. Dabney and F. J. Haddy. Role of chemical factors in regulation of flow through kidney, hindlimb and heart. Am. J. Physiol. 208:813-824, 1965. Daugherty, R. M., Jr., J. B. Scott, J. M. Dabney and F. J. Haddy. Local effects of O and CO2 on limb, renal, and coronary vascular resistances. Am. J. Physiol. 1102-1110, 1967. Fronek, A. Combined effect of carotid sinus hypotension and digestion on splanchnic circulation. Am. J. Physiol. 219:1759-1762, 1970. Berne, R. M. Regulation of coronary blood flow. Physiol. Rev. 44:1-29, 1964. Mellander, S. Systemic circulation: local control. Ann. Rev. Med. 32:313-344, 1970. Daugherty, R. M., Jr., J. B. Scott, T. E. Emerson, Jr., and F. J. Haddy. Comparison of iv and ia infusion of vasoactive agents on dog forelimb blood flow. Am. J. Physiol. 214:611-619, 1968. Steel, R. G. D. and J. H. Torrie. Principles and Procedures of Statistics with Special Reference to Biological Sciences. McGraw-Hill, New York, 1960. 70. 71. 72. 73. 74. 75. 124 Berne, R. M. and M. N. Levy. Cardiovascular Physiology. Mosby, St. Louis, 1972. Haddy, F. J. and J. B. Scott. Cardiovascular pharma— cology. Ann. Rev. Pharm. 6:49-76, 1966. Vander, A. J. Effects of catecholamines and the renal nerves on renin secretion in anesthetized dogs. Am. J. Physiol. 209:659, 1965. Cox, R. H. Influence of pentobarbital anesthesia on r cardiovascular function in trained dogs. Am. J. Physiol. 223:651-659, 1972. ”Mai-1'2" L'fl Cox, R. H. Influence of chloralose anesthesia on cardiovascular function in trained dogs. Am. J. Physiol. 223:660-667, 1972. Green, H. D. and C. E. Rapela. Cerebral vascular response to localized and systemic hypotension induced by hemor- rhage and shock. In: Microcirculation as Related to Shock. Academic Press, New York, 1968. APPENDICES APPENDIX A RAW DATA 125 126 LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS (For APPENDIX A) PCS = carotid sinus pressure (mm Hg) PS = systemic arterial pressure (mm Hg) PBA = brachial artery pressure (mm Hg) PMA = mesenteric artery or ileal segment perfusion pressure (mm Hg) PSMA = superior mesenteric artery pressure (mm Hg) PR = renal artery pressure (mm Hg) CSP = carotid sinus pressure (mm Hg) FBV = brachial vein blood flow (ml/min) FCV = cephalic vein blood flow (ml/min) FMA = mesenteric artery blood flow (ml/min) FSMA = superior mesenteric artery blod flow (ml/min) FR = renal artery blood flow (ml/min) HR = heart rate (beats/min) P02 = 02 tension of the carotid sinus blood (mm Hg) pH = pH of the carotid sinus blood M t a = ileal segment intraluminal pressure (mm Hg), t and a are qualitative assessments of ileal tone and activity, respectively, (scale: 0 - 4) 127 mm.h vw.h No.5 mm.b mm.h mm.h mm.b om.h vm.> Om.> om.h mm mHH OOH NOH NNH OOH ONH ONH NOH OO. OHH mm HOH va HON vOH NOH OOH OOH VOH ONH mmH NOH mm w.om 0.0m N.H O.Hm 0.00 0.0v 0.0H 0.0h 0.0v 0.00 >0 H.Hm OHH 0.0v NNH 0.0v OVH ~.hv OOH 0.0m OHH 0.0m OO 0.0v VO O.NO va 0.0m nHH 0.0V OO 0.0v OOH >mm dmm wEouomm>mHm HH¢ Eoom NNH OOH va OOH OOH ONH OHH ONH OOH hOH mHH ONH NOH OOH ONH NVH mNH OHH ONH HNH mHH OHH mu Om.n mm.h mm.h Om.h mm.h mm.h mN.h Hm.b hm.h .5N.h nm.n ma OHH mNH ONH NHH OOH OOH hNH OOH OOH OHH Ow mZHHmmom th th OHN NOH HNH ONH NOH OOH OOH OOH NOH mm s.mv m.om mHH mMH v.om «.mv mMH VMH w.nm m.mv an mmH O.H ¢.mv omH OHH w.mm 0.4m OHH mmH n.sm 0.0m om emH o.ov o.mv mm OHH m.sH ¢.om va NNH m.He o.vm omH mmH 0.0v o.vv mm OHH o.on 0.0v OHH omH >0m >mm «mm mm OEOHomm>mHm AHonucooO Noo mm I No NNH ONH OOH mmH OOH NNH OOH ONH ONH ONH OHH m0 OON cmmz H HNMVLOle‘CDONO # moo 128 00.0 00 450 0.04 0.00 400 H00 H00 00.5 000 050 5.04 0.00 000 000 50H :00: 00.5 4H 00H 0.00 0.54 00H 04H 00H 00.5 000 540 4.00 4.04 00H 40H 00H 0H 00.0 40 000 0.00 0.44 000 000 04H 00.5 000 000 0.50 0.04 500 00H 00H 0 00.0 00 04H 4.4 0.04 00H 45H 00H 00.5 500 000 0.4 4.04 000 040 00H 0 40.5 00 05H 0.50 0.00 000 00H 000 00.5 000 H50 0.00 0.40 000 000 000 5 00.0 00 H50 0.05 0.00 00 40H 000 00.5 000 45H 5.50 0.00 00 50H 00H 0 00.0 HH 000 4.04 0.00 50 000 00H 00.5 500 000 0.04 0.04 00 000 000 0 50.0 00 000 0.00 0.00 004 050 000 00.5 00H 000 0.50 4.00 40H 00H 00H 4 00.0 00 00H 0.50 0.00 000 000 000 50.5 00H 000 0.05 0.40 000 00H 00H 0 00.0 00 00H 0.04 0.04 000 000 000 50.5 000 000 0.04 0.44 00 000 000 0 00.5 50 050 0.05 0.04 400 000 0H0 50.5 00 000 0.05 0.04 000 000 00H H mm 000 mm >o0 >00 0mm mm mom mm 000 mm >o0 >mm 000 mm mom 0 moo. Hzosoo<>mmm HzoeooH>mmm 00o 000 I 0o 00 Aaonucoov 00o 00 u 0o 000 mSHHmmom 129 HO.h OO.h H0.0 HO.> O0.0 HO.h ON.b OO.h OO.> ON.h OO.n mm OH HH NH OH OH OH ON NH ON OOH OOH HON OOH HOH OOH OON NOH OhH NOH OOH mm O.HO 0.00 0.0 O.wO O.Nh 0.00 0.0H O.Nh 0.00 O.Nm >U N 0.00 000 0.04 000 0.04 000 0.04 000 0.00 000 0.00 05 0.04 50 0.00 040 0.00 500 0.44 000 0.04 000 >00 000 wzosou<>000 oo 00 I 0o 00 OOH OOH HOH OOH OOH OOH OOH HOH OOH OOH HO «- NNH ONH HOH OOH OOH OHH OHH NHH NHH OHH OHH mu ON.O OO.b ON.h O0.0 NO.h ON.h NN.h HO.> ON.h ON.> 0N.h mm OHH ONH ONH OHH ONH HOH OHH OOH OOH OHH OO mZHHmmom OOH NOH ONN OOH HOH OOH OOH OOH OOH OOH NOH mm 0.00 0.00 000 000 0.00 0.54 50H 000 0.00 0.04 040 000 0.0 4.04 050 50H 0.00 0.00 000 00H O.H5 0.00 05 NOH 0.04 0.04 00 00H 0.0H 0.05 04H 00H 0.05 0.00 50H 00H 0.04 0.44 00H OHH 0.05 0.44 NHH OHH >o0 >00 000 00 HzoaooO>000 AHoyucoov oo 00 I 0 ONH OOH OOH HOH OOH ONH OHH NNH NNH OHH OHH m0 OON :00: H HvamkohmmO O Ooo 130 00.0 000 050 4.00 0.04 000 500 000 00.5 000 050 0.00 0.04 400 000 500 :00: 00.0 040 040 0.00 0.54 000 000 000 00.5 000 040 0.00 0.54 000 500 000 00 00.0 040 000 0.00 0.50 040 000 040 00.5 000 000 0.00 0.00 000 000 040 0 00.0 500 000 0.00 0.00 000 000 000 00.5 000 000 0.0 0.00 000 000 000 0 00.0 000 000 0.00 0.00 400 400 040 00.5 000 000 4.00 0.00 400 050 000 5 00.0 440 000 0.05 0.40 55 000 400 00.5 000 400 0.05 0.00 05 000 000 0 00.0 400 000 0.04 0.04 00 000 000 00.5 000 000 0.04 0.04 40 00 000 0 50.0 000 000 0.00 0.00 000 400 000 00.5 50 000 0.00 4.00 000 000 000 4 00.0 400 050 0.40 0.00 000 040 000 00.5 000 050 5.05 0.40 000 400 400 0 O0.0 OOH OOH 0.00 0.00 ONH OOH OHH mm.h OHH OOH 0.00 0.00 OHH OOH OHH N 00.5 00 050 0.00 0.44 000 50 400 50.5 50 000 4.05 0.44 000 000 000 0 00 000 00 >o0 >00 000 00 0o0 00 0o0 00 >00 >00 000 00 000 0 moo wzoaooa>000 Hzosood>000 0oo 000 I 0o 000 000000000 0oo 00 I 0o 000 mEHHmmom 131 OH NN ON HN HH NH OH ON ON HH OH NN OH ON OOH OOH OOH OOH OOH OOH OOH OOH OOH OOH OOH OOH mm r» EEO"— 0.00 H.OO OOH OOH OHH 00.5 OHH OOH 0.00 0.00 OHH OHH OHH I I OOH OOH OHH 00.5 OHH I I I OOH OHH OHH 0.00 0.00 OHH ONH OHH O0.0 OHH ONH 0.05 0.00 OOH OOH OHH 0.0NH 0.00 OO OOH OOH 00.0 HOH OOH 0.0HH 0.00 OO OOH HOH 0.00 0.00 ONH OOH NOH I ONH ONH N.0O N.OO ONH OOH OOH 0.00 0.00 OOH OHH NHH 00.5 ONH OON H.OO 0.00 OOH OOH HHH 0.0H 0.0m 05H OOH H00 I OOH OOH N.0H 0.0N O5H ONH OHH O.HO 0.00 OHH OOH OOH I OOH OOH 0.00 0.00 OOH OOH NOH 0.05 0.00 OHH 05H NNH 00.5 OHH OOH 0.00 0.00 00 OHH ONH 0.00 0.00 OOH ONH O5 00.0 00H OOH 0.00 0.00 00 O0 Oh 0.0H 0.00 50H OOH OOH I NOH OOH 0.0H 0.00 OOH OOH OOH 0.00 0.00 OOH 05H OHH I OOH NOH 0.00 0.00 ONH HOH HNH 0.00 0.00 00H OOH OO I ONH OOH 0.00 0.00 HOH 00 00 0.00 0.00 OOH ONH OHH 50.0 OOH OOH O.HO N.OO OO HO OO >o0 >00 000 00 0o0 00 000 00 >o0 >00 000 00 000 OEOBOO<>BOOO NZOBOU<>BOOO NOU OON I No OO AHOHucooO 000 OO I NC OON mZHHmmom C602 I—INM I—IHI—i HNMV‘IDKDFQDQO H O O00 132 ON.O ON.O O0.0 ON.O ON.O H0.0 ON.O O0.0 O0.0 OH.O ON.O ON.O ON.O mm OH OH ON OH HH ON OH OH OH OH ON OOH OOH OOH NOH NOH OOH OOH OOH NOH OOH OOH OOH OOH mm r. -Iua 0.50 0.44 000 500 I I 000 000 0.00 0.44 000 000 0.400 0.00 50 000 0.00 0.00, 000 040 0.00 0.04 040 00 0.00 4.00 000 400 0.00 0.00 500 040 0.05 0.50 000 040 0.04 0.04 400 00 0.00 0.44 050 000 0.00 0.44 000 040 0.04 0.00 000 040 0.55 0.44 000 000 >o0 >00 000 00 0200000>0000 0oo 00 I 0o 00 OHH OOH OHH OOH OOH OOH OOH OOH ONH OO OOH OHH OO OO m0 ON.O OHH I NHH O0.0 OOH ON.O HO ON.O OHH ON.O OHH ON.O OOH ON.O ONH ON.O ONH ON.O OHH I OO ON.O OOH ON.O OHH I OHH mm Nom mSHHmmom OOH OOH OOH ONH OON OOH OOH OOH OOH OOH OOH OOH OOH mm H.OO 0.00 ONH HHH I I OOH OHH 0.00 0.00 OO OO 0.0NH 0.00 OO OOH 0.00 O.NO ONH OOH 0.00 0.00 OOH OOH 0.0N N.ON OOH OO N.OO 0.00 NHH OOH 0.00 N.OO OO ONH 0.00 0.00 OOH Om O.NH 0.00 OOH OOH O.HO N.OO ONH ONH 0.00 0.00 NOH ONH 0.00 O.NO OOH OO >Um >mm fimm mm N209004>Bm0m 000000000 00 00 I 0 OHH OHH NHH OOH OOH OHH OOH OOH ONH NO OOH OHO OO OO m0 OON :mmz OHNM r—II-II—II—i Hvamkol‘mCN O Ooa 133 H0.0 O0.0 H0.0 O0.0 O0.0 O0.0 O0.0 N0.0 O0.0 H0.0 O0.0 OH.O H0.0 mm ONH ONH OOH OOH HOH OOH ONH OOH NOH OOH OO OHH OOH ONH OOH OOH HOH OOH OON OOH OOH NOH NOH OOH OOH OOH OOH mm 4.50 0.04 040 I I 040 0.05 0.44 000 0.000 0.00 00 0.00 0.00 040 0.00 0.04 000 0.00 4.00 000 4.00 0.00 500 4.00 0.00 500 0.00 0.04 000 0.00 0.04 050 0.00 0.04 000 0.04 0.00 000 0.05 0.04 050 >o0 >00 000 0200000>0000 00o 000 I 0o 000 OHH HOH OOH OOH OOH OO OOH OOH ONH OO OOH ONH HOH OO NHH HOH OHH OOH OOH OOH OHH OOH OHH OO OOH OHH HO OO m0 ON.O ON.O ON.O ON.O ON.O ON.O O0.0 HN.O ON.O ON.O O0.0 mm OHH OHH NOH HO OHH ONH OOH ONH OHH ONH OO OO OHH OOH mZHHmmom OOH NOH OOH NOH OON OOH OOH OOH OOH OOH OOH OOH OOH mm 0.00 O.NO ONH OOH I I OHH OHH 0.00 0.00 OO OO 0.0NH O.NO OO OOH O.NO 0.0N OOH ONH 0.00 0.00 OOH OO N.HN 0.0N OOH NO N.OO 0.00 OHH OOH 0.00 0.00 OO OOH 0.00 0.00 OHH NO O.NH N.OO OOH OOH N.HO 0.00 ONH OHH N.OO 0.00 OOH NHH 0.00 0.00 ONH OO >Um >mm flmm mm OZOBOO<>BmOm HHOHUCOOO 00 OO I N O OHH OOH NHH OOH OOH OOH ONH OOH NNH OO NOH OHH OO OO OU OON C002 OI—INM I-II—lI—Ir-l r—INMQ‘LDKDNG'JG O OOQ 134 OH ON OH OH HH OH Coffin—Om rd OOMI—iO p rH mm.o OH mmH mm.m OH NOH oo.O mm mmH Om.m OH OOH mm.m mH mmH oo.O mH mmH mm mom mm Ozoaooa>mmm moo mom I No we OO OO OO OO OOH OHH OOH OO ONH OOH OOH OOH OHH O.H O. OO ONH OOH OHH OHH OOMNN It! mu COMP-lo 4.) O0.0 N0.0 O0.0 NN.O H0.0 N0.0 mm AnamEOmm HmmHHV MZHBmMBZH HHH OOH mO omH OOH Oom mO mm ONH owH mm mHH mOH NOH mw mmH MOH mmH Om OHH I OOH mOH MHH mom mm <2m mm OzoeomO>mmm Houucoov moo wwm I m NNH OO ONH OOH OHH ONH mu OON :mwz HNMV‘Lfi O O00 135 OH ON OH OH HH OH OH OH ON «2 0.0 O.H O O O O H O O O H O H N H H H N O O m u OOOO O0.0 O0.0 O0.0 O0.0 O0.0 H0.0 O0.0 O0.0 O0.0 mm N OH OOH OOH OH OOH OO Om OOH OOH I OOH OHH OH OOH OOH OH OOH OOH Om OON OOH HO OOH OOH OH OOH OOH ON OOH OON mom mm «2 O20O00O>Omom oo OON I No OO OOH ONH OOH OOH OHH OOH OOH OOH OOH OOH NHH 0.0 0.0 OO OOH HOH OO OHH ONH ONH OHH OOH OOOHONHNN OOOOONI—{OO (U 4.) mu Aucmemmm HmmHHO mzHOmmezH O0,0 O0.0 O0.0 O0.0 O0.0 O0.0 OOOO O0.0 O0.0 ON.O mm OOH OOH HHH OHH OOH OOH HO OOH OHH OOH OOH OOH I OOH OOH OOH OOH OOH OOH OO OOH OOH OO OHH OON OON OOH OOH OON OOH OHH OHH OHO OOH OOH OOH OHH OOH OHH OOH mom mm OEO mm OzoeouO>Omom AHouucooO moo OON I No HHH OO OOH OOH OO OHH OOH OHH OHH OOH m0 OON cam: HNMV‘WKDBGDON O moo 136 OH ON OH OH HH OH OH OH ON 0.0 0.0 O O H H H O O H H O N H O O O O O O m u N0.0 N0.0 N0.0 ON.O O0.0 N0.0 O0.0 O0.0 O0.0 N0.0 mm OH NOH OOH HH OOH OOH OH ONH OOH I OOH OOH OH OOH OOH OH OOH OOH OO OHO OOH OH OOH OHH OH OOH OOH OH OOH OOH mom mm 42m O2090u<>emom moo OO I 0 OO OOH OOH NOH OOH OOH ONH OOH OHH OOH OOH OHH O.H H.H O0.0 OOH O O O0.0 OOH O O O0.0 OOH H m O0.0 OO H O O0.0 OHH H O O0.0 OHH H O O0.0 OOH O O O0.0 OHH O m O0.0 OOH H H ON.O mum m 2 u Om Augmeawm HmmHHV OzHOOmOzH HOH OOH ONH HHH OHH NOH OO OO OHH OOH OO OHH I OOH OOH OOH OOH OOH HOH OO OOH OOH OOH OOH OON OON OOH ONH OON OOH OHH OOH OHO OOH OOH OOH OHH OOH OOH OOH mom mm 42m mm Ozoeowa>emom “Houucoov moo OON I O O NHH NOH ONH OOH OO OHH OHH OOH OHH OOH mu OON cmmz r-‘INMVLDLOBCDON O O00 137 OH ON OH OH HH OH OH OH ON O.H 0.0 NMHHHNI—‘IOM (U NHOOONr—IOM MOH NOH OOH OOH OON OO OOH OOH OO I OOH OOH OOH OOH OOH OOH OOH OON I OON HOH ONH OOH OOH I OOH OOH OOH NOH OOH mom Om «Em Osceow<>emom moo OON I No OON ONH ONH OOH OOH OO OO NOH OHH OOH OOH OOH O.H 0.0 O0.0 OOH N O NOOO ONH H H H0.0 OOH N H OOOO OO N N I OO O O O0.0 ONH H O O0.0 OO O O O0.0 OO N O N0.0 OOH H H ON.O mom m E u AucmaOmO HmmHHO MZHBmmBZH OOH NHH NHH HHH OOH ONN OON ONN OHH mm mom AHOHUCOUV OOH OHH HOH OOH OOH OO OO OOH OOH OO Om OOH OOH OOH OOH OOH HOH OOH OO OO OOH OOH OO OO OON OOH HOH OOH OOH OOH OO OO OOH OOH OO OO OOH OOH OOH HOH mm OSO Om mom O20900O>Omom Nou OON I No OON :mwz HNMV‘LDKDFCDG O OOQ 138 OOH OOH OOH NHH NON OOH OOH OOH NON N0.0 N0.0 H0.0 O0.0 O0.0 OH OOH OOH O OHH OOH ON NOH OOH I ONH OOH O OOH OOH OEOOOOO>OOOO Nou OON I No OO OH OOH OHH O ONH OOH ON OOH ONH NH NOH OOH Nom mm 42mm Ozoaow<>mmm Now OON I No OO OOH OOH OOH ONH OOH NOH ONH OOH OOH OOH OHH OHH OO OHH OHH OHH OHH ONH m0 O0.0 O0.0 H0.0 ON.O O0.0 NO OOH NOH NOH OOH OHH OO OHH OO OOH OHH OHH I ONH OHH OO OO OOH OO OHH Ozoeoom>emom AHouucooO Noo OON I N OOH NOH OOH ONH OOH ONH OOH OHH. OO OOH OOH OOH ONH OOH OHH OOH Nom mm Ozmm Om Osceomm>mmm AHouucoov Nou OON I N AOHmuud OHkucmmmz HOHuwmsmv MZHBmmBZH OOH OHH OHH OO OHH O OON HNH ONH OHH ONH m0 0 OON cmwz r-INM'Q‘ cmmz t-INMV‘ O O00 139 OOH OOH OOH NHH NON OOH OOH OOH NHH NON 42m O0.0 H0.0 O0.0 O0.0 O0.0 ON.O HN.O ON.O O0.0 mm Tux j HHH OOH ONH ONH OOH OHH OHH ONH OOH OOH OHH OOH I NOH OOH OO ONH OOH ONH OOH VSOBOU<>EmOm NOD OON I NO OON NH NOH OHH OOH O OHH ONH OOH HN OOH OHH OOH O NOH ONH OOH Nom mm 42mm mm Osceou<>emom N N 00 OO I 0 mo OOH OHH NHH OO OHH OHH OHH OHH OHH m0 O0.0 O0.0 O0.0 O0.0 O0.0 O0.0 O0.0 H0.0 O0.0 O0.0 mm OOH HOH OOH HOH ONH OHH OO OOH OOH OOH OOH OHH I ONH OOH OO OO OOH OO OHH Osceoo<>amom AHouucoov Noo OON I N OO OOH HOH OHH OOH OHH NO OOH OO OOH OOH OHH I ONH OOH OO OOH NOH OOH OHH Now an «ZOO mm OsceowO>aOom HHouuzoov Nou OON I N Amumuu< OHHmucmmmS HOHHmmsmO MZHBmMBZH OOH OHH OHH OO OHH O OON OHH OHH ONH OO OHH m0 0 «ON C002 I—iqu‘ cmmz HNMQ‘ O moo 140 OHH OOH OO NHH NOH OO OO OOH OOH OOH OOH O0.0 OH.O O0.0 O0.0 O0.0 O0.0 N0.0 O0.0 OH.O O0.0 O0.0 mm OH NOH ONH OH NOH OOH O OOH OON OH OHH OO HN OOH OO HN NOH OHN O OOH NO ON OOH OO OO NOH NO OH NOH OO NH OOH OOH Nom mm mm Osceowm>mmm Nou OON I 0 OO OOH ONH OOH OOH OOH OOH OHH OOH OOH OOH OHH OHH OO OOH OOH OOH OOH OO ONH OOH OOH OO m0 WMZOHM O0.0 O0.0 H0.0 O0.0 O0.0 O0.0 N0.0 O0.0 O0.0 N0.0 O0.0 mm HNH NO OOH NHH OHH OOH OOH OHH OOH OOH OO mom HHOHOCOUO HOH OO ONH NOH OO OO NOH OO OOH ONH OO OOH OOH OO OOH OOH OOH OHH OOH OO OOH OOH OO OOH OON OO OOH NOH OO OHH OOH OO OO mm O OO Ozoaow¢>mmm N N on OON I O OHH OO OOH NOH OOH OOH OOH HOH OOH OOH NO m0 OON cmmz r-i I—INMV‘LOOFQQO * O00 141 OOH OOH OO NHH NOH OO OO OOH OOH OHH OOH O0.0 O0.0 O0.0 O0.0 O0.0 O0.0 O0.0 O0.0 HH.O H0.0 O0.0 mm OH OOH OOH OH OOH OOH O OOH OHN OH OHH OOH OH OOH OO ON OOH OOH O OOH OO OO OOH OON OO NOH OON HH OOH OO HH ONH OOH N om mm mm Ozoeoo¢>emom Nou OON I No OO OOH OOH HOH OON NOH OO ONH OOH OHH ONH OO OOH OO ONH HOH OHH HO OOH OOH OOH OHH OO m0 OMZQHM O0.0 O0.0 H0.0 N0.0 OOoO H0.0 O0.0 O0.0 H0.0 N0.0 O0.0 mm NHH NOH HO NOH NO NOH OO OO OHH ONH OOH ONH OOH OOH 0O mmH OO NOH OO. ONH ONH OOH NHH OO OOH HNH OO OO OHH OOH OOH HOH ONH OOH Om mm OOH OOH OO OHH OO OmH MO OO Nom mm mm mm Osceow<>emom AHouucooO Nou OON I N O OOH OO OOH OOH OHH OO OO NOH OO OHH OO mu OI OON ammz I—i HNMQ‘LGKDNwONO # O00 142 OOH OOH OO NHH NOH OO OO OOH OOH OHH OO ON.O HOoO O0.0 ON.O ON.O ON.O NN.O OH.O ON.O ON.O ON.O mm OH OH OH OH ON OO NOm HOH OOH ONH OOH NO OOH OOH OOH OOH OOH OOH OHH OOH OO ONH OOH ONH OO OOH OOH ONH OOH OOH ONH OON OON ONH OOH OO OHH ONH OO OO mm mm m Osceoo<>emom Nou OO I No OO OOH OO OOH OHH NOH OO OOH OHH OOH OHH OO m0 MMZQHK O0.0 N0.0 O0.0 H0.0 O0.0 H0.0 N0.0 O0.0 H0.0 O0.0 O0.0 mm OHH OO OHH OHH OOH OOH OHH OHH ONH OOH OOH NonH HHouucoov OOH OO HOH NOH OO OO ONH OOH OOH OOH HO OOH OOH OO ONH OOH OO OO HNH OOH OOH OOH OO OOH NOH OO OOH OOH OO OHH ONH OO OO mm mm mm Osceoom>emom Nou OON I N O OOH OO ONH HHH OOH OO OOH OHH OOH OOH OO m0 OON cams I-i HNMVmKOFm¢O O OOQ 143 OOH OOH OO NHH NOH OO OO OOH OOH OHH OO FDA” ONH OOH ONH NNH OO HOH OO OO OOH OOH OOH OOH ONH NHH OOH OOH ONH OOH OOH OOH OOH NOH OOH OOH OHH HNH OOH ONH OHH OOH OOH OOH OOH NOH ONN OO ONH OOH OO OOH ONH ONH HO OO Nom mm mm mm OsceowO>emom Noo OON o OON OOH OO ONH OHH OOH OO OOH OOH OO OHH OO m0 NWZDHM O0.0 O0.0 O0.0 O0.0 H0.0 N0.0 H0.0 N0.0 O0.0 O0.0 O0.0 mm ONH OOH OO OO OO OOH OO OO ONH HOH OO ONH OOH NHH OO OHH OOH OOH OO OOH OOH OOH OO OOH OOH HNH OO OO OHH OOH OHH OOH NOH OON NOH OO NOH OOH OO OOH OOH ONH HO OO Nom mm O OO Ozoaow<>emom AHouuaooO Ooo OON I N O HOH OO ONH OHH OOH OOH OO OOH OO OOH OO m0 OON com: r-l HNMQ‘mwl‘me * Ooa 144 OOH OO HO OON OO OOH OOH OOH ONH OO OO OOH NOH cam: OOH OO OO OOH OO OO HO OO OO OO OO NO OO O OO OO OO OOH OOH OHH OHH OO OOH OO OO ONH OHH O OOH OO OHH OON OO OOH OOH OHH OOH OO OO OOH OOH O OO OO OO OON HNH OO OO ONH OO OO OOH OO OO O OOH HO OO OON OO OOH OOH OOH OOH OO OO OOH OOH m OHH OO NO OON HO OOH OHH OO OOH OO OO OOH OHH H Osceoo<>emom ONH OO OOH OON OO ONH ONH OOH OOH OO OO ONH OOH cam: ONH OO OOH OON OO OOH OOH OOH OOH OO OOH OOH OOH O OHH OO OHH OON OO OOH OOH OO OOH OO OO OOH OOH O NOH HO OOH OOH OO OOH OOH HO HOH OO OO OOH ONH O OO OO NOH OHN NHH ONH HNH OOH OOH OO OOH OHH OOH O OOH OO OHH OON OO OOH HOH OO OOH OO OO HOH OOH m OOH OO OO OON OO OOH OOH HO OHH OO OO OOH OOH H mm mm mm mum mm mm mum mm OAH mum mm mm mom O moo mmo OOHO Houucou mmu 304 Houucou OEOOQUO>OOO NMZQHM Dog # OkDCDQChU‘bU-JNH H Mean OKOCDQGUIJ-EnWNH H Mean OkOWflO‘UIJ-XLAJNH H Mean 102 101 103 130 100 104 100 96 81 115 103 155 106 115 141 95 133 97 120 100 125 119 24 17 17 23 17 18 31 25 31 18 22 30" 100 103 102 132 100 104 103 96 83 115 104 157 105 117 141 96 135 99 120 100 125 120 145 CORONARY VASCULATURE--STUDY 1 0% O 2 - 20% CO 2 (PREVAGOTOMY) SYSTEMIC ARTERIAL PRESSURE 60" 100 105 111 138 100 108 110 96 85 117 108 CORONARY ARTERY PRESSURE 158 107 121 143 100 135 99 119 100 125 121 90" 107 113 130 146 109 107 115 104 90 120 114 164 108 122 144 103 138 98 118 100 120 122 120" 110 112 132 152 115 108 120 105 96 126 118 165 109 125 142 108 140 95 117 100 112 121 150" 112 114 134 155 115 107 120 105 98 127 119 163 111 128 140 111 140 97 116 102 93 120 LEFT VENTRICULAR CONTRACTILE 24 17 17 23 17 18 31 25 31 18 22 23 17 17 23 17 18 31 25 31 17 22 22 15 17 21 17 17 30 24 30 16 21 22 15 16 2O 16 17 30 24 29 15 20 22 15 16 20 16 17 29 24 29 14 20 180" 115 117 128 150 113 105 120 104 100 127 118 167 113 128 140 112 140 95 115 117 90 122 FORCE 22 15 16 20 16 17 29 23 3O 13 20 210" 117 108 128 150 113 105 120 105 100 125 117 170 113 127 138 115 141 93 115 119 88 122 22 15 16 20 16 17 28 ‘23 3O 12 20 Tut-=1 ":1 . Dog # OkomQONUIbWNI-J H Mean OKDCDQmm-bwwld H Mean OOCDQO‘U‘IanNH H Mean C 80 107 90 113 84 110 75 105 63 108 94 148 164 137 135 158 85 113 140 160 133 17 24 18 21 24 21 15 25 26 21 21 30" 80 110 93 110 84 109 75 105 62 105 93 149 166 138 136 93 159 85 114 140 160 134 146 CORONARY VASCULATURE--STUDY 1 0% O2 SYSTEMIC ARTERIAL PRESSURE 60" 82 120 100 110 90 110 90 105 75 105 99 CORONARY ARTERY PRESSURE 150 167 139 135 95 158 91 116 143 162 136 90" 83 131 126 123 100 110 90 110 125 117 112 152 170 140 140 95 162 90 118 115 158 134 120" 90 140 150 138 105 105 97 125 135 125 121 155 175 143 139 95 155 93 117 90 150 131 150" 92 143 165 165 101 102 100 124 140 138 127 156 178 146 139 95 161 95 120 90 113 129 LEFT VENTRICULAR CONTRACTILE 17 23 18 21 24 21 15 25 26 21 21 17 22 18 21 24 21 15 25 26 21 21 16 20 15 20 24 20 14 24 23 19 20 16 18 14 19 24 19 13 19 20 18 18 15 18 13 18 24 20 12 18 18 14 17 - 20% C02(POSTVAGOTOMY) 180" 102 146 175 195 103 100 101 126 143 140 133 157 185 150 140 100 162 92 117 85 80 127 FORCE 15 17 12 18 24 20 12 18 18 11 17 210" 118 146 195 215 105 95 131 140 140 156 186 140 140 97 160 115 85 82 129 1 J. 17 1 .L 16 24 2O 17 18 ll 17 I" U 0 c5mnn~4mcnnuynaw O H Mean OkomflmmwaI-J H Mean OWGQtfiLflbWNH H Mean 95 105 110 112 45 75 70 101 78 100 89 153 155 135 133 114 135 70 130 75 150 125 17 29 16 21 20 19 18 27 28 19 21 30" 92 106 106 115 47 75 70 103 80 100 89 152 157 135 135 115 136 71 130 75 150 126 147 CORONARY VASCULATURE--STUDY l 0% 02 SYSTEMIC ARTERIAL PRESSURE 60" 86 101 110 120 50 74 73 101 105 100 92 CORONARY ARTERY PRESSURE 155 156 136 135 115 138 75 130 75 154 127 - 5% COZ(POSTVAGOTOMY) 90" 93 110 134 133 55 75 85 108 115 100 101 157 160 135 136 115 140 75 130 65 153 127 120" 93 122 157 140 68 77 90 112 115 105 108 159 164 136 136 115 136 74 130 55 151 126 150" 92 128 162 146 70 80 92 116 115 106 111 160 164 141 133 116 137 74 128 50 150 125 LEFT VENTRICULAR CONTRACTILE 16 29 15 21 20 19 18 27 28 19 21 15 28 13 21 20 19 17 27 28 19 21 15 27 13 20 20 19 16 26 19 19 19 15 24 13 20 20 19 16 25 15 19 18 15 23 11 19 20 19 16 23 14 19 18 180" 92 130 165 155 75 80 95 124 115 109 114 158 166 146 137 114 136 75 127 50 145 125 FORCE 14 22 11 19 20 l9 16 25 14 18 18 210" 133 165 175 75 82 93 123 115 113 117 157 170 148 133 113 135 74 126 50 143 125 14 21 11 19 20 19 16 25 14 17 18 148 CORONARY VASCULATURE--STUDY l 20% O2 - 20% COZ(POSTVAGOTOMY) SYSTEMIC ARTERIAL PRESSURE Dog # C 30" 60" 90" 120" 150" 180" 210" l 100 98 101 104 108 108 110 116 2 _ _ - _ - _ _ - 3 110 110 115 138 141 146 148 142 4 110 110 110 118 122 123 130 133 5 81 80 87 95 98 101 101 99 6 70 70 75 80 80 80 78 78 7 102 99 110 110 105 105 105 105 8 102 105 104 106 108 106 107 105 9 68 68 97 100 103 102 107 107 10 105 105 106 115 118 120 120 120 Mean 94 94 101 107 109 110 112 112 CORONARY ARTERY PRESSURE 1 164 162 165 168 170 168 165 165 2 _ _ _ - - - _ _ 3 148 147 147 146 148 146 146 144 4 142 142 14] 146 143 143 137 137 5 100 99 100 98 97 96 95 93 6 150 151 154 153 154 155 154 155 7 82 80 81 .80 78 80 77 77 8 132 132 132 133 135 132 134 134 9 133 136 139 135 137 135 135 135 10 135 140 142 142 140 137 138 139 Mean 132 132 134 133 134 132 131 131 LEFT VENTRICULAR CONTRACTILE FORCE 1 22 22 21 21 20 20 19 1 2 ... _ _. _ _ .. _. .- 3 16 16 16 15 14 14 14 14 4 22 22 22 21 20 20 2O 19 5 23 23 23 23 22 22 22 22 6 24 24 24 23 23 23 22 22 7 18 18 17 17 17 16 16 16 8 28 28 27 27 26 26 26 26 9 27 27 27 26 26 25 25 25 10 20 20 20 18 17 17 16 16 Mean 22 22 22 21 21 20 20 20 149 CORONARY VASCULATURE--STUDY 2 0% O2 ‘ 20% CO2 (PREVAGOTOMY) SYSTEMIC ARTERIAL PRESSURE Dog # c 30" 60" 90" 120" 150" 180" 210" 240" 1 96 97 99 105‘ '107 113 116 118 125 2 105 105 '105 106 106 107 108 108 109 3 120 120 140 138 143 145 150 150 150 4 136 140 150 162 167 165 170 168 167 5 95 95 96 97 104 108 112 115 118 6 116 120 125 134 134 134 133 133 133 Mean 111 113 119 124 127 129 132 132 134 CORONARY ARTERY PRESSURE 150 150 150 152 153 153 150 151 155 128 129 130 131 131 129 128 127 126 125 125 130 120 132 140 145 148 148 125 126 125 132 135 140 139 139 137 138 138 138 137 135 130 128 127 125 81 83 84 84 85 87 88 93 97 mmanH Mean 125 125 126 126 129 130 130 131 131 LEFT VENTRICULAR CONTRACTILE FORCE 1 43 42 43 41 39 38 37 37 36 2 24 24 24 22 20 19 19 18 18 3 14 14 14 13 13 12 12 13 13 4 37 37 37 33 31 31 30 30 30 5 32 32 32 32 31 29 29 29 29 6 35 34 3O 26 26 27 27 27 27 Mean 31 31 3O 28 27 26 26 26 26 Dog # mmwat—I Mean ONUIubUJNl-J Mean mmprt—I Mean C 67 91 62 133 80 105 90 131 144 86 140 130 170 134 44 25 36 41 35 40 37 30" 67 91 64 134 80 105 90 130 144 86 140 132 170 134 150 CORONARY VASCULATURE--STUDY 2 O 0% 2 SYSTEMIC ARTERIAL PRESSURE 60" 70 90 70 157 85 122 99 CORONARY ARTERY PRESSURE 131 146 86 140 135 170 135 - 20% COZ(POSTVAGOTOMY) 90" 90 91 125 182 115 140 124 132 150 88 134 127 170 134 120" 118 95 160 192 125 168 143 115 150 90 134 119 145 126 150" 133 96 175 195 133 180 152 108 149 95 134 120 145 125 LEFT VENTRICULAR CONTRACTILE 44 25 36 41 35 38 37 44 25 34 35 35 37 35 45 24 30 32 30 31 32 41 21 25 28 25 28 36 20 22 28 27 27 180" 128 96 178 205 135 192 156 115 149 98 140 123 158 131 FORCE 35 20 26 28 27 27 210" 126 100 178 203 131 205 157 125 148 100 146 125 158 134 37 19 26 28 27 27 240" 127 98 175 200 132 205 156 125 148 101 152 123 160 135 37 20 27 28 27 28 Dog # Mean Mean NH Mean C 132 100 116 120 150 135 37 33 35 30" 130 100 115 120 150 135 151 CORONARY VASCULATURE--STUDY 2 5% o - 2+3 co 2 (POSTVAGOTOMY) 2 SYSTEMIC ARTERIAL PRESSURE 60" 90" 120" 150" 132 135 137 130 102 103 105 101 117 119 121 116 CORONARY ARTERY PRESSURE 118 116 115 114 154 154 153 154 136 135 134 134 180" 135 100 118 115 155 135 LEFT VENTRICULAR CONTRACTILE FORCE 37 33 35 37 37 37 37 33 33 33 33 35 35 35 35 36 33 35 210" 135 100 118 113 155 134 35 33 34 240" 135 103 119 114 155 135 36 33 35 152 CORONARY VASCULATURE--STUDY 2 10% 02 - 24% C02(POSTVAGOTOMY) SYSTEMIC ARTERIAL PRESSURE Dog # C 30" 60" 90" 120" 150" 180" 210" 240" 1 77 77 78 80 80 82 81 80 83 2 98 98 97 95 96 95 95 95 95 3 62 60 56 55 59 56 56 54 53 Mean 79 78 77 77 78 78 77 76 77 CORONARY ARTERY PRESSURE 1 123 123 124 124 125 125 125 126 126 2 143 143 143 144 143 143 143 142 142 3 80 79 76 75 74 72 71 70 70 Mean 115 115 115 114 114 113 113 113 113 LEFT VENTRICULAR CONTRACTILE FORCE 1 37 37 37 37 37 37 37 37 37 2 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 3 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 Mean 47 47 47 47 47 47 47 47 47 153 CORONARY VASCULATURE--STUDY 2 20% O2 - 10% C02(POSTVAGOTOMY) SYSTEMIC ARTERIAL PRESSURE Dog # C 30" 60" 90" 120" 150" 180" 210" 240" 1 75 75 77 80 80 80 80 78 78 2 95 96 97 98 100 98 99 99 99 3 66 65 72 82 90 94 96 96 95 4 125 125 125 135 136 140 140 140 140 5 95 96 99 100 101 100 100 100 98 6 105 105 105 110 114 114 113 115 115 Mean 94 94 96 101 104 104 105 105 104 CORONARY ARTERY PRESSURE 1 127 127 127 128 127 126 127 126 125 2 139 139 139 140 140 141 142 141 140 3 90 90 95 93 91 90 92 91 93 4 120 120 123 124 123 122 122 122 123 5 122 123 126 125 125 124 125 125 125 6 157 157 157 159 156 156 157 159 158 Mean 126 126 128 128 127 127 128 127 127 LEFT VENTRICULAR CONTRACTILE FORCE 1 40 40 40 40 39 39 29 39 39 2 23 23 23 22 22 22 22 22 22 3 37 37 37 37 37 37 37 37 37 4 40 40 40 40 40 38 39 38 38 5 31 31 32 31 30 30 31 30 30 6 42 42 42 41 37 38 40 39 40 Mean 36 36 36 35 34 34 35 34 34 154 CORONARY VASCULATURE--STUDY 2 10% O2 - 10% COZ(POSTVAGOTOMY) SYSTEMIC ARTERIAL PRESSURE Dog # C 30" 60" 90" 120" 150" 180" 210" 240" 1 67 68 69 76 80 83 84 85 87 2 92 91 92 95 95 94 93 94 94 3 68 70 67 86 92 95 103 105 103 4 125 125 127 133 137 146 150 156 156 5 87 87 87 87 90 92 92 93 93 6 105 105 106 115 114 115 116 115 115 Mean 91 91 91 98 101 104 106 108 108 CORONARY ARTERY PRESSURE 1 128 129 129 129 128 127 128 128 128 2 141 142 142 143 145 145 134 145 145 3 96 95 93 94 9O 87 89 88 87 4 123 124 125 124 122 120 118 117 117 5 125 126 125 125 126 127 128 127 125 6 165 164 165 164 164 164 162 163 163 Mean 130 130 130 130 129 128 128 128 128 LEFT VENTRICULAR CONTRACTILE FORCE l 40 40 4O 40 39 39 39 40 38 2 28 28 28 26 26 26 25 26 2 3 38 38 37 37 36 34 35 36 37 4 41 40 40 40 40 39 38 27 27 5 33 33 33 32 32 32 32 32 31 6 42 42 42 38 38 39 39 39 40 Mean 37 37 37 36 35 35 35 35 35 APPENDIX B STATISTICAL METHODS 155 ._.. m 156 STATISTICAL METHODS Since in every dog a control period preceded each experimental maneuver, each animal served as its own control. To statistically analyze the data the Student's t test for paired observations was used. This approach was used in Emm‘ order to eliminate the source of extraneous variance exist- ing from pair to pair. This was done by calculating the variance of the differences rather than that among the 'j individuals within each sample. —— The parameters analyzed by this statistical method included the systemic arterial pressure, organ perfusion pressure, blood flow, heart rate and left ventricular contrac- tile force data. The animal's control data for each of the above parameters were used as one of the paired values while the data obtained during the experimental maneuver were used as the other value. The mean for the controls was designated £1 and the mean for the experimentals designated £2. The mean difference between the values was £1 - £2 which also equaled d. 35 equaled the standard error of the mean paired difference and was calculated from A 2 D? - ( 2 D, )2/n s: 13 :3 n (n - 1) 157 The test statistic (t) . The hypothesis being tested was If the sample t was greater than the tabulated value with which it was compared, then the null hypothesis was rejected ”If and the alternative accepted. For this study a significance level of .05 was used. In the case of the comparison of the percent changes in vascular resistance (Table 9), the t test modified for un- raj paired observations and unequal variances was used. A suffi- ciently accurate approximation for determining a significant value of t' was calculated from wl tl + w2 t 2 2 _ 2 where wl - sl/nl, w2 — 52/n2' and t1 of Student's t for nl - l and n2 - 1 degrees of freedom at and t2 are the values the .05 significance level. This approximation erred slightly on the conservative side in that the value of t' required for significance may have been slightly too large. ”7111111111th7!flifllilEfl'l‘fllfll’lfllWlflmS 1293 0