A COMBINATION OF LIGHTWEIGHT ROLLING AND SAND TOPDRESSING TO DECREASE FUNGICIDE INPUTS AND ENHANCE GOLF COURSE FAIRWAY TURF QUALITY By Thomas O. Green A THESIS Submitted to Michigan State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Crop and Soil Sciences ÑMaster of Science 2015 ABSTRACT A COMBINATION OF LIGHTWEIGHT ROLLING AND SAND TOPDRESSING TO DECREASE FUNGICIDE INPUTS AND ENHANCE GOLF COURSE FAIRWAY TURF QUALITY By Thomas O. Green Dollar spot ( Sclerot inia homoeocarpa F.T. Bennett) is a pervasive turfgrass disease in the upper Midwest affecting turfgrass quality, decreasing golf course playability, and resulting in millions of dollars spent on frequent fungicide applications. Michigan State University s cientists observed reduced dollar spot infection in putting greens that were rolled several times weekly. Others observed less incidence of disease in sand -topdressed putting greens. We hypothesi zed that dollar spot infection i n fairways would be decreased by sand topdressing and by rolling thereby reducing the need for frequent fungicide treatments. Two research projects were devised to address the practicality of this disease management strategy. The first project objective was to examine dollar spot seve rity responses i n an Agrostis stolonifera L. and Poa annua L. fairway to varying frequencies of lightweight rolling and to sand topdressing with no fungicide application. Sand topdressing reduced infection by 50%. Cumulative effects of rolling were investi gated with the one, three, and five time weekly rolling treatments. The three and five time rolling treatment had less disease compared to the control during the period of dollar spot activity. The second project assessed the effects of different fungicide application rates combined with sand topdressing and lightweight rolling on dollar spot disease in fairway turf. All monthly fungicide application rates improved turfgrass quality and normalized differen ce vegetation index (NDVI) compared to the control. Moreover, as rolling frequency increased from 0 to 3x weekly on the no fungicide plots, sand topdressing improved turf quality and reduced dollar spot incidence. iii To my great -grand father, Nathaniel Green , MD. Although we nev er met in life, thy spirit of life inspires me to great delight. iv ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The sincerest thank you to Bruce (Pop) and Yoshiko (Ma) Green for your tender love, your unyielding generosity, and your great wisdom. T hank you siblings , Edward and Natalie , for your love and support throughout the years as well . A hearty salutation goes out to my major professor and advisor Dr . John N . Rog ers, III. Your steadfast patience and profound wisdom is second to none . Keep looking for lost souls, Doc. I also must recognize my committee members, Dr. James R. Crum, Dr. Joseph M. Vargas, Jr., and Dr. Thomas A. Nikolai, for their remarkable acuity in all matters regarding scientific research . Acknowledgements must be extended to the Mich igan State University Turf Team; I tip my h at to all the professors, research assistants, and graduate students as well as to the managers, Mr. Mark Collins and Jesse Sholl, and staff members of the Han cock Turfgrass Research Cente r for their assistance. We have the best turfgrass research facility in the whole world because of you all, and that is an undeniable fact . I salute Dr. Renate Snider for showing me the ways of scientific writing ÑGod speed. Finally, I extend my sincerest gratitude to the administrative staff and faculty members of the Depa rtment of Plant, Soil, and Microbial Sciences; thank you Dr. J.J. Kells and Dr. Eunice Foster for your unyielding support throughout the years. v TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES ÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉ vi LIST OF FIGURES ÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉ.. viii INTRODUCTION ÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉ. 1 LITERATURE REVIEW ÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉ...... 3 Dollar Spot ÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉ .. 3 Dollar Spot Management ÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉ.. .. 4 Lightweight Rolling ÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉ.. .. 6 Sand Topdressing ÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉ 8 SUMMARY ÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉ.. 9 REFERENCES ÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉ...... 10 CHAPTER 1 : EFFECTS OF LIGHTWEIGHT ROLLING AND SAND TOPDRESSING ON THE SEVERI TY OF DOLLAR SPOT INFECTION AND QUALITY OF TURFGRASS I N A GOLF COURSE FAIRWAY ÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉ. .. 16 ABSTRACT ÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉ...16 INTRODUCTION ÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉ. 17 MATERIALS AND METHODS ÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉ.. 20 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION ÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉ 25 Effects on Dollar Spot Severity ÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉ... ....... É 25 Effects on Turfgrass Quality ÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉ. .. 30 CONCLUSIONS ÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉ....... 42 REFERENCES ÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉ.. .... 45 CHAPTER 2 : EFFECTS OF LIGHTWEIGHT ROLLING AND SAND TOPDRESSING ON THE EFFICACY OF FUNGICIDE APPLI CATION RATES FOR THE REDUCTION OF DOLLAR SPOT DISEASE IN GOLF COURSE FAIRWAY ÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉ 49 ABSTRACT ÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉ.. 49 INTRODUCTION ÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉ. 50 MATERIALS AND METHODS ÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉ...... 54 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION ÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉ... 57 Effects on Dollar Spot Severity ÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉ.. 57 Effects on Normal ized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) ÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉ 57 Effects on Turfgrass Quality ÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉ... ............ 66 CONCLUSIONS ÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉ... 75 REFERENCES ÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉ...... 78 vi LIST OF TABLES Table 1. MS U Hancock Turfgrass Research Center experimental fairway site soil test results; analysis performed at the MSU Soil and Plant Nutrient Laboratory. East Lansing, MI 2014ÉÉÉÉÉÉÉ... ................................................................. ÉÉÉ.. 21 Table 2. Particle size distribution of topdressing sand; anal ysis performed at the MSU Soil and Plant Nutrie nt Laboratory. East Lansing, MI 2015ÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉ......... 23 Table 3. Effects of sand topdressing and rolling frequency on percen tage plot surface area affected by dollar spot disease. East Lansing, MI 2011 ÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉ........ 26 Table 4. Effects of sand topdressing and rolling frequency on percentage plot surface area affected by dollar spot disease. East Lansing, MI 2012ÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉ ........ 28 Table 5. Seasonal precipitation amounts received at the Hancock Turfgrass Research Center. East Lansing, MI; June -September 2011 -2014ÉÉÉÉÉÉ ÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉ.... 29 Table 6. Effects of sand topdressing and rolling frequency on percentage plot surface area af fected by dollar spot disease. East Lansing, MI 2013ÉÉÉÉÉÉ ÉÉÉÉÉÉÉ 31 Table 7. Seasonal climatic conditions experienced at the H ancock Turfgrass Research Center. East Lansing, MI 2013ÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉ ...... 32 Table 8. Effects of sand topdressing and rolling frequency on percentage plot surface area af fected by dollar spot disease. East Lans ing, MI 2014ÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉ ÉÉÉÉ 34 Table 9. Effects of sand topdressing and rolling frequency on turfgrass quality. East Lansing, MI 2011 ÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉ.. 35 Table 10. Effects of sand topdressing and rolling frequency on turfgrass quality. East Lansing, MI 2012 ÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉ.. 38 Table 11. Effects of sand topdressing and rolling frequency on turfgrass quality. East Lansing, MI 2013 ÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉ.. 39 Table 12. Effects of sand topdressing and rolling frequency on turfgrass quality. East Lansing, MI 2014 ÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉ.. 41 Table 13. Effects of sand topdressing, rolling frequency, and boscalid fungicide application rate on percentage plot surface area affected by dollar spot disease (Rutstroemia floccossum syn. Sclerotinia homoeocarpa F.T. Bennett). East Lansing, MI 2 013ÉÉ ...................................................................................................... 59 vii Table 14. Effects of sand topdressing, rolling frequency, and boscalid fungicide application rate on percentage plot surfac e area affected by dollar spot disease (Rutstroemia floccossum syn. Sclerotinia homoeocarpa F.T. Bennett). East Lansing, MI 2014ÉÉÉÉ ÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉ.. 60 Table 15. Effects of sand topdressing, rolling frequency, and boscalid fungicide application rate on normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI range from 0.000 to 1.000 with higher values indicative of healthier plants). East Lansing, MI 201 3ÉÉÉÉ ÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉ... 61 Table 16. Effects of sand topdressing, rolling frequency, and boscalid fungicide application rate on normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI range from 0.000 to 1.000 with higher values indicative of healthier plants). East Lansing, MI 2014É ÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉ.. 63 Table 17. Effects of sand topdres sing, rolling frequency, and boscalid fungicide application on turfgrass quality; visually assessed on a 1 (dead or poor) to 9 (best) rating scale with 6 being acceptable. East Lansing, MI 2013ÉÉÉ ÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉ....67 Tab le 18. Effects of sand topdressing, rolling frequency, and boscalid fungicide application rate on turfgrass quality; visually assessed on a 1 (dead or poor) to 9 (best) rating scale with 6 being acceptable. East Lansing, MI 2014ÉÉÉ ÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉ69 Table 19. Seasonal climatic conditions experienced at the Hancock Turfgrass Research Center. East Lansing, MI 2014ÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉ ÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉ.. 71 viii LIST OF FIG URES Figure 1. Effects of sand topdressing x rolling freq uency on percentage plot surface area affected by dollar spot disease observed on September 2, 2011 . East Lansing, MIÉ ...... 27 Figure 2. Effects of sand topdressing x rolling frequency on percentage plot surface area affected by dollar spot disease observed on August 21, 201 3. East Lansing, MIÉÉ ..... 33 Figure 3. Effects of sand topdressing x rolling frequency on turfgrass quality observed on Sep. 10, 2011 . East Lansing, MI ÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉ.. 37 Figure 4. Effects of sand topdressing x rolling frequency x fungicide application rate on NDVI, August 11, 2014 . East Lansing, MI ÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉ.. 64 Figure 5. Effects of rolling frequency x fungicide application rate on NDVI, August 18, 2014 . East Lansing, MI ÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉ. .. 65 Figure 6. Effects of rolling frequency x fungicide application rate on turfgrass quality, August 6, 2013. East Lansing, MIÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉ ÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉ. 68 Figure 7. Effects of sand topdressing x rolling frequency x fungicide application rate on turfgrass quality, July 28, 2014. East Lansing, MIÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉ É72 Figure 8. Effects of sand topdressing x fungicide application rate on turfgrass quality, August 4, 2014. East Lansing, MIÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉ É.. 73 Figure 9. Effects of sand topdressing x rolling frequency x fungicide application rate on turfgrass quality, August 11, 2014 . East Lansing, MIÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉ.. 74 1 INTRODUCTION Turfgrass health is a critical concern for golf course managers in the upper Midwest. More money is expended trying to manage Dollar spot, caused by Sclerotinia homoeocarpa F.T. Bennett, than any other turf disease (Goodman and Burpee, 1991; Vargas, 2005). Consequently, having an effective and economical disease management strategy is very important to practically all associates of golf course industry. Chlorothalonil (tetrachloroisophthalonitrile) is a pesticide that provides broad -spectrum control of numerous pathogens, but is primarily used as a fungicide on crop and non -crop sites such as nurseries, home lawns, and golf courses (National Marine Fisheries Service, 2011). Moreover, on Michigan golf cou rses, it is the most frequently used pesticide (Rothwell, 1997). In 1999 -2000, the total domestic use exceeded 6.8 million kg active ingredient (a.i.) of chlorothalonil, with approximately 680,000 kg a.i. used on turf areas (National Marine Fisheries Servi ce, 2011). In 2007, chlorothalonil was the most commonly used fungicide in the agricultural sector (3.6 million kg a.i.) as well as the industry/commercial/government market sector (1.8 million kg a.i.) (National Marine Fisheries Service, 2011). A surveye d report of 49 Michigan golf course superintendents revealed that fairways averaged 1.8 applications of chlorothalonil per year while the greens received 4.4 per year (Smitley and Rothwell, 2003). Although dollar spot causes substantial turf injury and is particularly severe on fairways, fungicide use is often curtailed because of environmental, fungicide -resistance, and economic concerns with the latter related to the shear size (12 -16 ha) of fairway areas on golf courses (Delvalle et al., 2011). These combined factors, in the minds of many turf managers, lend an intractable quality to dollar spot. The causal pathogen rarely kills the grass plant; however, the symptomatic lesions that appear on the turfgrass leaf blades affects the aesthetics as well as the playability of the golf course. 2 If the disease is left untreated on closely mowed grasses, lesions quickly coalesce into large, obstreperous patches (Smiley et al, 1992), whereby the golf ball direction and speed of travel upon the turf surface becomes greatly impeded. Therefore, in an effort to combat the ravages of dollar spot, fungicides are often applied to maintain the playability and aesthetic appeal of the golf course. The popularity of chlorothalonil for use to control dollar spot can be attr ibutable to the multi -site mode of action this contact fungicides possess, which make the development of pathogen resistance less likely to occur (Golembiewski et al., 1995). Another quality that makes the use of contact fungicides popular among turf manag ers is their relative low cost, particularly when compared to single -site mode of action systemic fungicides that are more expensive, and often promote the development of pathogen resistance. Dollar spot resistance has been noted in several classes of syst emic fungicides: benzimidazoles, dicarboximides, and demethylation inhibitors (Warren, 1974; Detweiler et al., 1983; Golembiewski et al., 1995). Contact fungicides are often applied at preventative rates (reduced concentration) in anticipation of conditi ons conducive to dollar spot outbreak rather than at curative application rates (full concentration) when severe disease pressure is present (Williams et al., 1996). Nevertheless, the efficacy of contact fungicides is rather short lived (7 -14 days) compare d to systemic fungicides (21 -28 days). Therefore, in light of EPA mandated pesticide use restrictions and environmental concerns, turf disease management strategies should include the use of cultural practices that promote plant health while being also an tagonistic to the disease life cycle (Giordano et al., 2012). 3 LITERATURE REVIEW Dollar Spot Dollar spot, the most common foliar disease of turfgrass in the upper Midwest , affects turfgrass quality, decreases golf course playability, and resul ts in mi llions of dollars spent on frequent fungicide applications. The causal pathogen, Rutstroemia floccossum syn. Sclerotinia homoeocarpa F.T. Bennett (Smiley et al., 1992), infects a variety of both warm and cool season grasses world wide, and interestingly, i s considered the anomaly of fungal taxonomy whereas genus classification of this fungus is still ongoing (Cabone and Kohn , 1993). In 1937, British m ycologist F.T. Bennett observed peculiar variability of species characters i n dollar spot fungus; some produ ced spore s and conidia, others produced spores and Òmicro -conidiaÓ, while another isolate of the fungus was Ònon -sporingÓ , yet occasionally produced sterile apothecia (Bennett, 1937). Subsequently, the teliomorph stage (sexual) is still rarely observed in the field ( Jackson, 1973; Baldwin and Newell, 1992). Therefore, t he primary means of fungus survival and dissemination is the stroma, which are flattened, compact mass es of fluffy white, sometimes olive, grey, yellow, or brown mycel ium (Smiley et al., 1992 ). Dollar spot disease symptoms on closely mowed (putting green or fairway) turf appear as small circular, straw -colored sunken spots that range in size from 2 to 6 cm in diameter (Vargas, 2005). Under favorable environmental conditions the spots can enl arge and coalesce, and thus decimate vast areas of turfgrass. Lesions on individually infected leaf blades first appear chlorotic, and then water -soaked, and finally, a bleached coloration. Moreover, these lesions have a distinct hour-glass -shape with tan or reddish -brown margins (Smiley et al., 1992) . All grasses except Poa annua L. exhibit this lesion border color characteristic (Vargas, 2005). When dew persists on dollar spot infected grass blades white, fluffy mycelium may often be observed on the turf surface (Monteith and Dahl, 1932) . 4 The dollar spot fungus survive s unfavorable environmental conditions as dormant mycelia in infected plant tissue and as stromata on leaf blade surfaces. This fungus spread s mainly through movement of mycelia and infect ed plant tissue by equipment, humans, animals, wind, or water, and as favorable conditions arise and fungal growths reprise , mycel ium can then penetrate leaf tissue, invade through stomata, or enter cut leaf ends and cause infection (Smiley et al., 1992). Temperatur e and humidity are influential factors for epidemics of turfgrass plants caused by the facultative -saprophytic fungus S. homoeocarpa . Warm, humid conditions and a susceptible host favor the pathogenÕs growth. Drought -stressed plants (Couch and B loom, 1960; Couch, 1966) with depleted nitrogen levels (Couch and Bloom, 1960; Markland et al., 1969; Liu et al., 1995; Williams et al., 1996; Landschoot and McNitt, 1997 ) are particularly prone to severe plant damage. Cyclic air temperatures of 15.5 to 26.8¡ C (Bennett, 1937 ; Endo, 1963 ) and periods of high humidity (Couch, 1962) in the turf canopy favor rapid proliferation of the aerial mycelium of dollar spot fungus. Dollar Spot Management The use of p rimary cultural practices like fertilization, irriga tion , and mowing along with supplementary cultural practices of cultivation , rolling, and san d topdressing can suppress dollar spot activity. Although perhaps not as effective as conventional, chemical pest management systems, certain cultu re practices hav e prove n to be acceptable disease management strategies in terms of playing conditions (Rossi and Grant, 2009). Fertilization supplies plants with the essential elements needed for optimal growth and development. Research has shown that t urf plants that r eceived adequate to high rate s of nitrogen had less dollar spot infection than unfertilized plants, or those that received low rates of nitrogen (Couch and Bloom, 1960; Markland et al., 1969; Liu et al., 1995; Williams et al., 1996; Landschoot and McNitt, 1997). Markland et al. (1969) also associated higher levels of potassium with reduced incidence of dollar spo t in creeping bentgrass. Potassium, an essential element , increase s plant disease resistance; it also affects the wear tolerance, rooting, and drou ght and temperature extreme 5 hardiness of grasses (Reid, 1933; Bell and DeFrance, 1944; Holt and Davis, 1948; Markland and Roberts, 1967) . For example, wear tolerant plants have thick , rob ust cell wall structures that are less prone to crushing, or tearing during mowing operations, thus less ening the chance for pathogen penetration and infection at leaf wound sites (Beard, 1973) Infectious foliar diseases thrive in warm, humid environments. Some researchers have shown the direct relationship of temperature a nd duration of leaf wetness to anthracnose disease severity (Danne berger et al., 1984). However, others have steadfastly reported on the relationship of irrigation frequency and timing to brown patch (causal pathogen, Rhizoctonia solani Kuhn) severity in perennial ryegrass ( Lolium perenne L.) (Settle et al ., 2001), and concluded that dew removal by light and frequent, daily watering regimes reduced disease severity . Therefore, it appears that irrigation has a two -fold effect on dollar spot reduction: one be ing to replenish soil moisture levels to avoid drought -stress related disease epidemics (Couch and Bloom, 1960; Couch, 1966), and the other, depending on the timing, to disrupt pathogen activity on the leaf surface (Settle et al., 2001). Light and frequent irrigation refers to replenishing soil moisture levels to field capacity while the terms deep and infrequent refer to watering at onset of plant leaf wilt (Fry and Huang, 2004). Some researchers have reported that light and frequent, daily applications of water during late -afternoon, or late -evening reduced dollar spot in creeping bentgrass compared to the infrequently (at 22:00 h, twice weekly) irrigated plots (Dykema, 2014). While dollar spot can be suppressed with fungicides, turfgrass managers commonl y limit their use due to economic, environmental, and fungicide resistance concerns (Delvalle et al., 2011). However, the rising cost and imminent ban of certain chemical pesticides have caused turf managers to clamor for effective yet inexpensive means t o control turf diseases. One chemical slated for ban is chlorothalonil, the most commonly used fungicide in the turf industry (McDonald et al., 2006), and currently one of 54 fungicides, insecticides, and herbicides listed in the lawsuit filed by several Northwest Pacific Environment Coalitions against the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA, 6 2011). The reason for the potential ban lies solely in the toxicity levels of chlorothalonil metabolites and degradation products, which adversely affect rainbow trou t egg production and survival rate (Davies and White, 1985). This contact fungicide is relatively inexpensive, provides broad -spectrum control of numerous foliar diseases, and is a favorite among turf managers because it is less likely to cause pathogen re sistance, which can occur in many systemic fungicide groups like the benzimidazoles (Warren et al., 1974), dicarboximides (Detweiler et al., 1983) , and demethylation inhibitors (DMI)(Golembiewski et al ., 1995). Therefore, if recent plans from the EPA to ba n chlorothalonil come to fruition then it is up to the turf research scientists to find effective and affordable alternatives for managing S. homoeocarpa. Lightweight Rolling The use of r olling (by manually drawn/driven stone, wooden, or metal cylinders) to flatten , level, or smooth a turf surface is a cultural practice that dates back to the early 1700s (Beard et al., 2014). This practice was primarily used to correct imperfections after winter th awing and frost heaving, and by burrowing insects and mamm als (Welton and Carroll, 1940), but sometime around the 1930s, rolling fell out of favor , particularly on putting greens, once the adverse effects from soil compaction were acknowledged (Beard and Beard, 2005) . The reason for the early demise of rolling cou ld be attributed to the popularization of the game during the late -1880s and into the 1930s as more golf cours e construction projects moved inland onto loamy -textured soils , and away from the sandy dune strewn, coastal region where the modern game of golf originated (Beard and Beard, 2005). In contrast to s and -based putting green s, rolling practices were adversely affecting the quality of loam -based putting greens with the primary result being compaction Ñthe s evere reduction of volume and continuity of the larger pores (Ball et al., 1988). On the oth er hand, sand -textured soils are highly resist ant to compaction and shearing forces due to a phenomenon called dilatancy . Sand soil is predisposed to expand when subjected to shearing stress as p article surfaces begin sliding 7 across another and grains commence roll ing over another , porosity increases in the area of shearing (Reynolds, 1885 ). The resurgen ce of the practice of rolling greens could be attributed to the United States Golf Association Green Section Staff article that detailed a method of sand -based putting green construction (USGA Green Section Staff, 1960). In the late 1950s, Dr. Ray Kunze and others conducted ex tensive research to develop specificatio ns for the USGA putting green. They observed an in crease of turf quality when soil mixtures had greater than 7 0% sand by volume (Kunze, 1956). The USGAÕs work as well as the work of Dr. Gardner (Washington State University) helped determine the ideal physical characteristics of soils for putting greens (Ferguson, 1968), and t heir contributions can directly be attributed to the subsequent and widespread adoption o f the layered -sand USGA con str uction method. The advent of the USGA putting gre en in the 1960s did not necessarily mark the triumphant return of rollin g practices. It was th e availability of the sel f-propelled lightweight roller (first used on grass tennis courts in Australia) in the late 1980s that contributed to the reassessment of the bene fits of rolling (Hartwiger, 2001 ). In recent years, these rollers have been used extensively not only to increase turf smoothness and quality (Beard, 1982) , but also to increase the golf ball speed and travel distance on the putting green. While studying these rolling effects on putting distance, turfgrass scient ists at Michigan State University discovered a novel strategy for plant disease management. Rolling several times per week not only increased putting distance, but also, unexpectedly, reduced dollar spot incidence (Nikolai, 2001). Moreover, rolling reduced the severity of anthracnose (caused by Colletotrichum graminicola ), particularly when conditions conducive to disease outbreak were moderate (Inguagiato et al., 2009). Consequently, researchers then began to ponder the mechanisms surrounding the effects o f rolling on disease suppression. Settle et al. (2001) also reported that dew removal by mechanical wiping of foliage reduced brown patch disease (caused by R. solani ) in perennial ryegrass . These findings are further corroborated by the conclusions of Wi lliams et al. 8 (1996) and Delvalle et al. (2011) on the beneficial practice of mechanical wiping and morning mowing to control dollar spot disease in creeping bentgrass, and how displacement of leaf surface moisture contributed to disease suppression. In r ecent years, the popularity of greens rolling has increased, and as a result, turf equipment manufacturers have introduce d not only dedicated gree ns rollers, but also rollers specifically designed for fairway applications (Williams, 2012) . In some instance s, the l evel of cultural intensity for the fairway does not greatly differ from the green Ñwhatever works for the green, will work on the fairway. Thus, the beneficial aspects associated with greens rolling will most likely be observed if rolling practices are implemented on a fairway. Sand Topdressing With plentiful supplies of sand around Scottish linksland golf courses, the practice of s and patching and topdressing was regularly used as early as the 1840s (Beard et al., 2014). Patchin g was described as sand filli ng rabbit scrapes and burrows , and pre -dated broadcast topdressing . Early topdressing applications usually involved shovel -scattering either sand, or sand amended with manure, bone/blood meal, or seaweed (Beard et al., 2014) ac ross the t urf surfa ce, and then brushing or poling to uniformly incorporate the material. In recent years, sand topdressing has become normal practice on putting greens because it enhances turfgrass health (Skorulski et al., 2010). Since healthy plants can withstand disease pressure more readily (Couch and Bloom, 1960), these same procedures that are used on the greens would likely be successful on the fairways. Thatch is organic material loosely composed of both living and dead, lignified -plant parts such as the leaves , ste ms, stolons, rhizomes , and shallow r oots (Ledeboer and Skogley, 1967 ). Excessive accumulation of this subs tance has been attributed to numerous turfgrass deficiencies such as increase d loc alized dry spot (Cornman, 1952); exacerbated disease incidence (Bear d, 1973 ; Murray and Juska, 1977) ; and adversely affect ed water infiltration rates (Murray and Juska, 1977). 9 Some researchers have the belief sand topdressing can provide a favorable microclimate to facilitate thatch decomposition within the turf canopy and upper rhizosphere (Ledeboer and Skogley, 1967). On the other hand, some researchers believe that s and topdressing dilutes thatch (McCarty et al., 2005), and this dilution effect is just as important as biodegradation in dealing with excessive thatch accum ulation within the turfgrass ecosystem (Couillard et al., 1997). Therefore, sand topdressing could be an alternative for managing turf diseases in lieu of chemical pesticide applications, and offer major advantages such as the following: they reduce the necessity for fungicides, extend the efficacy of fungicides, and reduce the possibility of human exposure to them (Giordano et al., 2012). Instead of applying eight to nine fungicide treatments per season at a cost of $16,000 -27,000 annually on fairways (Tu rf Producers International, 2011), sand topdressing alone may alleviate this annual expenditure, and possibly cut the cost per application by 25 to 50%. SUMMARY Research has shown that lightweight rolling and san d topdressing can be used to improve turfg rass quality and decrease disease incidence on putting greens (Nikolai et al., 2001). However, the effectiveness of these cultural practices at managing the ravages of dollar spot disease i n a golf course fairway is a novel procedure, and lacks sufficient research . 10 REFERENCES 11 REFERENCES Baldwin, N.A. and A.J. Newell. 1992. Field production of fertile apothecia by Sclerotinia homoeocarpa in Festuca turf. J. Sports Turf Res. Inst. 68: 73 -76. Ball, B.C., M.F. OÕSullivan, and R. Hunter. 1988. Gas diffusion, flow fluid, and derived pore continuity indices in relation to vehicle traffic and tillage. J. Soil Sci. 39: 327 -339. Beard, J.B. 1973. Turfgrass: Science and Culture. Prentice -Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, NJ. Beard , J.B. 1982. Turf rolling. Grounds Maintenance . 29 (1): 44 -52. Beard, J.B. and H.J. Beard. 2005. Turfgrass culture evolution at the St. Andrews golf links. Int. Turfgrass Soc. Res. J. 10 (1): 70 -79. Beard. J.B., H.J. Beard, and J.C. Beard. 2014. History of golf course turfgrass development. p. 65. In Turfgrass History and Literature: Lawns, Sports, and Golf. Michigan State University Press. East Lansing, MI. Bell, R.S. and J.A. DeFrance. 1944. Influence of fertilizers on the accumulation of roots by cl osely clipped bentgrasses and on the quality of turf. Soil Science. 58: 17 -24. Bennett, F.T. 1937. Dollarspot disease of turf and its causal organism, Sclerotinia homoeocarpa N. sp. Annals of Applied Biology. 24: 236 -257. Carbone, I. and L.M. Kohn. 1993. Ribosomal DNA sequence divergence within internal transcribed spacer 1 of the Sclerotiniaceae . Mycologia 85:415 -427. Cornman, J.F. 1952. Mat formation on putting greens. Golf Course Rep. 20(4): 8 -14. Couch, H.B. 1962. Disease of Turfgrasses. Reinhold Pu blishing Corp. New York. pp. 1 -289. Couch, H.B. 1966. Relationship between soil moisture, nutrition, and severity of turfgrass diseases. J. of Sports Turf Res. Inst. 11(42): 54 -64. Couch, H.B. and J.R. Bloom. 1960. Influence of environment on diseases of turfgrasses. II. Effect of nutrition, pH, and soil moisture on Sclerotinia dollar spot. Phytopathology. 50: 761 -763. Couillard, A., A.J. Turgeon, and P.E. Rieke. 1997. New insights into thatch biodegradation. Int. Turfgrass Res. J. 8: 427 -435. Danne berger, K.T., J.M. Vargas, Jr., and A.L. Jones. 1984. A model of weather -based forecasting of anthracnose on annual bluegrass. Phytopathology. 74: 448 -451. 12 Davies, P.E. and R.W.G. White. 1985. The toxicology and metabolism of chlorothalonil in fish. I. Lethal levels for Salmo gairdneri , Galaxias maculatus , G. truttaceus and G. auratus and the fate of 14C -TCIN in S. gairdneri . Aquatic Toxicology. 7(1 -2): 93 -105. Detweiler, A.R., J.M. Vargas, Jr., and T.K. Danneberger. 1983. Resistance of Sclerotinia homoe ocarpa to iprodione and benomyl. Plant Disease. June. 67: 627 -630. Delvalle, T.C., P.J. Landschoot, and J.E. Kaminski. 2011. Effects of dew removal and mowing frequency on fungicide performance for dollar spot control. Plant Disease . November. 95(11): 142 7-1432. Dykema, N.M. 2014. Impact of irrigation regime and host cultivar on dollar spot of creeping bentgrass. M.S. diss. Michigan State University. East Lansing, MI. Endo, R.M. 1963. Influence of temperature on rate of growth of five fungus pathogens o f turfgrass and on rate of disease spread. Phytopathology. 53: 857 -861. Ferguson, M. 1968. Evolution of a putting green. USGA Green Section Record. May. 6(1): 1 -4. Fry, J. and B. Huang. 2004. Irrigation. p. 170. In Applied Turfgrass Science and Physiolo gy. John Wiley and Sons. Hoboken, NJ. Giordano, P.R., T.A. Nikolai, J.M. Vargas, Jr., and R. Hammerschmidt. 2012. Timing and frequency effects of lightweight rolling on dollar spot disease in creeping bentgrass putting greens. Crop Sci. June 52:1371 -1378. Golembiewski, R.C., J.M. Vargas, Jr., A.L. Jones, and A.R. Detweiler. 1995. Detection of demethylation inhibitor (DMI) resistance in Sclerotinia homoeocarpa populations. Plant Dis. 79: 491 -493. Goodman, D.M. and L.L. Burpee. 1991. Biological control o f dollar spot of creeping bentgrass. Phytopathology. 81: 1438 -1446. Hartwiger, C.E., C.H. Peacock, J.M. DiPaola, and D.K. Cassel. 2001. Impact of light -weight rolling on putting green performance. Crop Sci. July/August. 41(4): 1179 -1184. Holt, E.C. and R .L. Davis. 1948. Differential responses of Arlington and Norbeck bentgrasses to kinds and rates of fertilizers. J. American Soc. Agron. 40: 282 -284. Inguagiato, J.C., J.A. Murphy, and B.B. Clarke. 2009. Anthracnose disease and annual bluegrass putting gr een performance affected by mowing and lightweight rolling. Crop Sci . July/August. 49(4): 1454 -1462. 13 Jackson, N. 1973. Apothecial production in Sclerotinia homoeocarpa F.T. Bennett. J. of Sports Turf Res. Inst. 49: 58 -63. Kunze, R. 1956. The effects of compaction on different golf green soil mixtures on plant growth. M.S. diss. Michigan State University. East Lansing, MI. Landschoot, P.J. and A.S. McNitt. 1997. Effect of nitrogen fertilizers on suppression of dollar spot disease of Agrostis stolonifer a L. Int. Turfgrass Soc. Res. J. 8(1): 905 -911. Ledeboer, F.B. and C.R. Skogley. 1967. Investigations into the nature of thatch and methods for its decomposition. Agron. J. 59: 320 -323. Liu, L.X., T. Hsiang, K. Carey, and J.L. Eggens. 1995. Microbial p opulations and suppression of dollar spot disease in creeping bentgrass with inorganic and organic amendments. Plant Dis. 79(2): 144 -147. Markland, F.E. and E.C. Roberts. 1967. Influence of varying nitrogen and potassium levels on growth and mineral compo sition of Agrostis palustris Huds. Agronomy Abstracts. p. 53. Markland, F.E., E.C. Roberts, and L.R. Fredrick. 1969. Influence of nitrogen fertilizers on Washington creeping bentgrass, Agrostis palustris Huds. II. Incidence of dollar spot, Sclerotinia hom oeocarpa , infection. Agron. J. 61: 701 -705. McCarty, L.B., M.F. Gregg, J.E. Toler, J.J. Camberato, and H.S. Hill. 2005. Minimizing thatch and mat in a newly seeded creeping bentgrass golf green. Crop Sci. 45: 1529 -1535. McDonald, S.J., P.H. Dernoeden, an d C.A. Bigelow. 2006. Dollar spot and grey leaf spot severity as influenced by irrigation, chlorothalonil, paclobutrazol, and a wetting agent. Crop Sci. 46: 2675-2684. Monteith, J. and A.S. Dahl. 1932. Turf diseases and their control. Bulletin of the USGA Green Section. 12(4): 137 -138. Murray, J.J. and F.V. Juska. 1977. Effect of management practices on thatch accumulation, turf quality, and leaf spot damage in common Kentucky bluegrass. Agron. J. 69: 365 -369. Nikolai, T.A., P.E. Rieke, J.N. Rogers, II I, and J.M. Vargas, Jr. 2001. Turfgrass and soil responses to lightweight rolling on putting green root zone mixes. Int. Turfgrass Soc. Res. J. 9(2): 604 -609. Reid, M.E. 1933. Effect of variations in concentration of mineral nutrients upon the growth of s everal types of turf grasses. USGA Green Section Bulletin. 13(5): 122 -131. Reynolds, O. 1885. On the dilatancy of media composed of rigid particles in contact, with experimental illustrations. Phil. Mag. 5(20): 469 -481. 14 Rossi, F.S. and J.A. Grant. 2009 . Long term evaluation of reduced chemical pesticide management of golf course putting turf. Int. Turfgrass Soc. Res. J. 11(1): 77 -90. Rothwell, N.L. 1997. Effects of maintenance and cultural practices on Ataenius spretulus Haldeman (Coleoptera: Scarabaeid ae) and their natural enemies on golf course turf. M.S. diss. Michigan State University. East Lansing, MI. Settle, D, J. Fry, and N. Tisserat. 2001. Effects of irrigation frequency on brown patch in perennial ryegrass. Int. Turfgrass Soc. Res. J. 9(2): 71 0-714. Skorulski, J., J. Henderson, and N. Miller. 2010. Topdressing fairways: more is better. USGA green section record . March/April. 48(2): 15 -17. Smiley, R. W., P.H. Dernoeden, and B.B. Clark. 1992. Infectious foliar disease. Compendium of Turfgrass Diseases, 2 nd ed. American Phytopathological Society. St. Paul, Minnesota. Ch. 2:11 -37 Smitley, D.R. and N.L. Rothwell. 2003. How the use of chlorothalonil on golf courses impacts Paenibacillus sp., a pathogen of Ataenius spretulus (Coleoptera: Scarabaeid ae). J. Econ. Entomol. 96(3): 792 -797. Turfgrass Producers International (TPI). 2011. State of Michigan turfgrass facts . E-Newsletter. Vol. 4 (9). U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 2011. National Marine Fisheries Service biological opinion: registra tion of pesticides 2, 4 -D, triclopyr BEE, diuron, linuron, captan, and chlorothalonil. Endangered Species Act. Section 7: Consultation. June. 3:57 -63. USGA Green Section Staff. 1960. Specifications for a method of putting green construction. USGA J. Turf. Mgt. 13(5): 24 -28. Vargas, J.M., Jr. 2005. Fungal diseases of turfgrass, I: diseases primarily occurring on golf course turfs. p. 19 -22. In Management of Turfgrass Diseases. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Hoboken, NJ. Warren, C.G., P. Sanders, and H. Cole. 19 74. Sclerotinia homoeocarpa resistance to benzimidazole configuration fungicides. Phytopathology. 64: 1139 -1142. Welton, F.A. and J.C. Carroll. 1904. Lawn experiments. Ohio Agricultural Experiment Station Bulletin. 619: 6 -7. Williams, B.R. 2012. On a rol l: WhatÕs good for the greens has got to be right for the fairways, right? Golf Course Industry. October 24(10): 22 -24, 26 -27. 15 Williams, D.W., A.J. Powell, Jr., P. Vincelli, and C.T. Dougherty. 1996. Dollar Spot on bentgrass influenced by displacement of leaf surface moisture, nitrogen, and clipping removal. Crop Sci. 36: 1304 -1309. 16 CHAPTER 1 : EFFECTS OF LIGHTWEIGHT ROLLING AND SAND TOPDRESSING ON THE SEVERITY OF DOLLAR SPOT INFECTION AND QUALITY OF TURFGRASS IN A GOLF COURSE FAI RWAY ABSTRACT Sclerotinia homoeocarpa F.T. Bennett (dollar spot) is the causal pathogen of dollar spot disease. If left untreated, this disease can decimate turf stands, and render golf course conditions unplayable; thus, negatively affecting revenues a nd resulting in millions of dollars spent on frequent fungicide applications. Scientists observed reduced dollar spot infection in putting greens that were rolled several times weekly. Others observed reduced incidence of disease in putting greens treated with sand topdressing. We hypothesized that dollar spot infection in a golf course fairway would be decreased by the combination of sand topdressing and rolling thereby reducing costly fungicide treatments. The objective was to examine turf quality and dol lar spot severity responses in an Agrostis stolonifera L. and Poa annua L. fairway to lightweight rolling and sand topdressing. The study was conducted from 2011 to 2014 at the Hancock Turfgrass Research Center at MSU using a split block design with treatm ents consisting of biweekly sand topdressing, rolling at three frequencies (once, three times, or 5 times weekly), a control, and three replications. Infection was visually estimated. Sand topdressing significantly ( P < 0.05) reduced infection up to 50% at the peak of the dollar spot activity in 2011, 2013, and 2014. The 3x and 5x weekly rolled treatments exhibited 50% less dollar spot injury in 2013. Some data results showed that the combination of rolling 3 and 5x weekly and sand topdressing decreased dol lar spot severity more than the aforementioned treatments alone. 17 INTRODUCTION Doubtless, the necessity to maintain the health, performance, and aesthetics of golf course turf has produced many innovative turf management strategies. Mowing, rolling, and coring as well as fertilizing and irrigating are a few examples of beneficial cultural practices employed by turfgrass managers around the world. One of the earliest turf culture practices was rolling of the green. It was typically used to smooth surface imperfections, and in fact, predates mechanical mowing (Beard et al., 2014). The original rollers were cylindrically shaped stone devices manually pushed, or pulled across the turf surface (Beard et al., 2014). Methods improved over time, and when new fabr ication techniques came along, wooden, cast iron, and steel alloy rollers respectively replaced the heavy stone units. Horse -drawn and subsequently, engine -driven devices followed soon thereafter, and thus, rolling became routine practice on virtually ever y ÒballÓ sport turf sward at the turn of the twentieth century (Beard et al., 2014). The practice of lightweight rolling is uniquely associated with the advent of the performance -engineered sand putting green in the 1960s. The USGA Green Section Staff began sand -based putting green research in the late 1940s and early 1950s, and with the collaboration of various research institutions, a momentous contribution was made toward performance putting green specifications and methods of construction, and the eventual development of the USGA specification putting green (Ferguson, 1968). However, golf superintendents and golf course architects were not eagerly excited to adopt this construction method, and many considered the late 1960s and 1970s the Òdark agesÓ of the golf industry with very few USGA specification putting greens being constructed in the United States. Most people believed that the economic recession and energy shortage were probable causes for the decline of new golf course construction (Moncrie f, 1977). Likewise, rolling practices and particularly sand topdressing lost favor with golf course superintendents during this time era (Bengeyfield, 1962; Hall, 1978). Despite the dearth of innovation following the introduction 18 of the USGA putting green, technological advancements in turf machinery, irrigation and drainage systems as well as material like engineered sands for topdressing could be hailed as the catalysts that eventually led to the widespread adoption of the sand -based putting green constru ction method during the golf course building boom of the mid 1980s to early 2000s (NGF, 2013), and subsequently brought rolling and sand topdressing (Madison, 1981) back into the turf culture regimes of the golf course superintendent. From a modern go lf turf culture perspective, lightweight rolling has been used to increase ball roll speed and distance (Nikolai et al., 2001) as well as to smooth the surface of the putting green. Whether rolling is applied daily or weekly, a device of varying force per unit area (from 0.3 to 0.7 kg cm -2) and design configuration (this includes rollers on mowers) is often employed on a putting green. In the late 1990s, Michigan State University researchers discovered a novel disease management strategy while deciphering t he effects of rolling and soil fertility on different root zones of a putting green. They reported that rolling at a frequency of three times weekly unexpectedly reduced dollar spot incidence, localized dry spot, moss, and broadleaf weeds in creeping bentg rass (Nikolai et al., 2001). The research results of MSU scientists were met with cautious skepticism by golf course superintendents and researchers alike, and besides MSUÕs research, few other institutions were studying the effects of lightweight rolling on disease reduction. For example, over a decade elapsed before one study observed that rolling decreased the severity of anthracnose caused by Colletotrichum cereale (Inguagiato et al., 2009) while another reported that rolling not only increase ball roll distance, but also did not exacerbate anthracnose disease in annual bluegrass putting greens (Roberts et al., 2012). These experiments, simple in themselves, demonstrated that turfgrass edaphic environment and pathogen activity could be affected by rollin g practices; however, the mechanisms surrounding the effects of rolling on disease suppression are somewhat mysterious. Many people believe leaf exudate (guttation) and dew that accumulate on the leaf surface provide sustenance for 19 pathogens like R. solani and S. homoeocarpa (Monteith and Dahl, 1932; Williams et al., 1996). Consequently, most golf course superintendents regularly remove dew from the turf surface by any means necessary; they will swipe with a fiberglass pole, or drag a rubber hose, from roll ing to irrigating, all in the quest to rid the turf area of dew (Vargas, 2005). Nevertheless, researchers have reported that displacement of leaf surface moisture has some effect on disease incidence, and dew removal by mechanical wiping of foliage and mor ning mowing not only reduces brown patch disease (caused by R. solani ) in perennial ryegrass (Settle et al., 2001), but also dollar spot in creeping bentgrass (Williams et al., 1996; Delvalle et al., 2011). Rolling, like tillage and traffic, alters soil po rosity particularly the volume and continuity of the macropores (Beard, 1973; Ball et al., 1988). Depending on the texture, soils vary greatly in the degree of compactability (Beard, 1973). Since compaction increases the matric potential of soil without an increase in mass of water (Hillel, 1998), a coarse textured soil can benefit from certain compaction operations like rolling. Studies have shown that sand textured (80% sand, 10% peat, 10% soil) plots that were rolled had increased percentage water retent ion in comparison to the non -rolled plots (Nikolai et al., 2001). The mechanism by which rolling is suppressive to the dollar spot pathogen could be attributed the effect of proper soil moisture level on avoidance of drought -stress related disease epidemic s (Couch and Bloom, 1960; Couch, 1966), or the effect of beneficial microorganisms that proliferate in the edaphic environment of a turfgrass community (Giordano et al., 2012). The objective of the study was to evaluate the hypothesis regarding lightweig ht rolling and sand topdressing effects on dollar spot severity in a mixed -sward creeping bentgrass and annual bluegrass fairway. Different rolling frequency and sand topdressing treatments were used in order to garner data that would help validate this hy pothesis. Our objective was to investigate the hypothesis that dollar spot severity would be decreased by rolling and by sand topdressing, thus reducing the need for frequent fungicide applications on golf course fairways. 20 MATERIALS AND METHODS Field re search on the effects of rolling and sand topdressing on the severity of dollar spot infection on golf course fairways was conducted from May through October in 2011, 2012, 2013, and 2014 at the Hancock Turfgrass Research Center, East Lansing, Michigan. Th e experimental site was a mixed -stand fairway of annual bluegrass (Poa annua L.) and creeping bentgrass (Agrostis stolonifera L. ÔPenncrossÕ) seeded in 2009 on a loam -textured native soil (MSU Soil and Plant Nutrient Laboratory, East Lansing, MI)(Table 1). The site was divided into six 542 m 2 experimental units Ñthree blocks received a sand topdressing treatment and three blocks were not sand topdressed (native soil). Also, within this site, twenty -four 3.8 x 4.8 m plots were randomly assigned a rolling tre atment Ñhalf would be on the sand topdressed blocks with the other half on native soil blocks. We maintained the site as a typical, Michigan golf course fairway; it was mowed (clippings not collected) three times weekly at 0.127 cm, and if no rain events oc curred, 0.4 cm of water was applied in a single irrigation period from May to October. Fungicides were not applied to any of the treatment plots for the duration of the study; however, at the end of each growing season azoxystrobin (does not control dollar spot) was applied to discourage gray snow mold disease ( Typhula incarnata Lasch ex Fr., (syn. Typhula itoana Imai). Moreover, the site was not core cultivated during the course of the study in order to minimize surface disruption and soil displacement. He rbicides and insecticides were applied seasonally as needed. 21 Table 1. MSU Hancock Turfgrass Research Center experimental fairway site soil test results; analysis performed at the MSU Soi l and Plant Nutrient Laboratory. East Lansing, MI 2014. pH 7.8 cmol kg -1 CEC 15 Soil Particle Analysis % Sand (0.05 - 2.0 mm) 50 Silt (0.002 - 0.05 mm) 24 Clay (< 0.002 mm) 26 Soil Type Loam 22 In 2011, liquefied, granular fertilizer 46 -0-0 (24.5 kg N ha -1) was applied six times from May to September. I n 2012, we changed the fertilizer formulation to a 28 -0-0 (6.1 kg N ha -1) applied at 10-d intervals, and this became our fertilizer regime for the duration of the study. Moreover, in 2013 and 2014, we supplemented our liquid fertilizer regime with several applications of polymer coated, slow -release fertilizer 29 -0-10 (61.1 kg N ha -1): one on July 20, 2013, and another on June 7, 2014. The final supplemental fertilizer application was once again a polymer coated, slow -release 29 -2-9 (51.8 kg N ha -1) on Augu st 29, 2014. The first two seasons of the study, in 2011 and 2012, we relied upon natural, S. homoeocarpa inoculum to produce dollar spot, but in 2013 and 2014, to encourage uniform coverage of the disease, all treatment plots were artificially inoculated using the Dykema (2014) protocol, which is an enhanced version of the Goodman and Burpee (1991) technique. After a 10 -d incubation period, this concoction of silica sand, cornmeal, potato dextrose agar, and S. homoeocarpa ÔVCG -BÕ (Powell and Vargas, 2001) inoculum was applied at a rate of 440 kg ha -1 using a Gandy drop -spreader (Model 36H13, Gandy Co, Owatonna, MN). The plots were rolled 1, 3, and 5 times weekly using True -Surface (Turfline, Inc. Moscow, MO) vibratory -roller units (38.6 kg unit -1) affixed to a John Deere 2500A (Deere & Co. Moline, IL) triplex -mower (590.9 kg) with a swath of 1.6 m, and a vertical force value of 0.32 kg cm -2. Sand topdressing was applied biweekly from May to September using a Toro Topdresser 2500 (Toro Co., Bloomington, MN) at a rate of 11.2 m 3 ha-1 that provided a 3.6 cm sand layer over a four -year period (Table 2). 23 Table 2. Particle size distribution of topdressing sand; analysis performed at the MSU Soi l and Plant Nutrient Laboratory. East Lansing, MI 2015. Par ticle Size (mm) Percentage Distribution (%) Gravel (> 2) 0.4 Very Coarse Sand (1.0 Ð 2.0) 10.9 Coarse Sand (0.5 Ð 1.0) 25.3 Medium Sand (0.25 Ð 0.5) 41.6 Fine Sand (0.10 Ð 0.25) 19.6 Very Fine Sand (0.05 Ð 0.10) 0.6 Silt (0.002 Ð 0.05) 0.9 Clay (< 0.002) 0.7 Soil Type Sand 24 The percentage plot surface area affected by dollar spot lesions was visually rated on a scale of 0 to 100% on a weekly basis when symptoms occurred. Turfgrass quality was visually assessed using methods established by the National Turfgrass Evaluation Program, Inc. (NTEP, Beltsville Agricultural Center, Beltsville, MD), whereas color, density, uniformity, texture, and biotic and abiotic stress constitute quality ratings based on a 1 (dead or poor) to 9 (best) rating scale, with 6 being acceptable. The experimental design was split -plot randomized complete block design with three replications. Treatment factors included rolling frequencies of 1, 3, and 5 times weekly wit h a control, and sand topdressing (control and biweekly sand topdress applications). The experimental data was analyzed using PROC GLIMMIX procedure in SAS (version 9.3 and 9.4; SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, 2014). Main effects were rolling frequency (who le plot), and sand topdressing (split -plot). Analysis of variance was used to determine significant effects (P<0.05), and when significant differences were detected, means were separated using Fisher Õs and Tukey -Kramer methods (Westfall et al., 1999). 25 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Effects on Dollar Spot Severity Significant main effects of sand topdressing and rolling frequency on percentage plot surface area affected by dollar spot (causal pathogen, Rutstroemia floccossum syn. Sclerotinia homoeocarpa F.T. Bennett) lesions were observed in our study. In 2011, the sand topdressing treatment significantly reduced the percentage plot surface area affected by dollar spot compared to the control (native soil) (Table 3). High frequency rolling produced the gr eatest reduction in dollar spot disease in comparison to the control on several dates. A sand topdressing x rolling frequency interaction was observed on one collection date in 2011, whereas the 3 and 5 x weekly rolling treatments in combination with sand topdressing significantly reduced dollar spot disease (Figure 1). This interaction supports earlier claims that sand topdressing and rolling significantly reduces turf disease severity. Main effects of sand topdressing were not significant in 2012; h owever, main effects of rolling frequency were significant on two collection dates (Table 4). Contrary to the overall trend observed in 2011, dollar spot incidence was most severe on the plots that received the high frequency rolling treatments. Although d ollar spot disease was not rampant and somewhat difficult to investigate in Michigan due to the persistently hot, dry weather conditions of the 2012 -growing season, our observations support earlier statements that drought -stressed turf is more susceptible to the ravages of dollar spot disease as well as to the detrimental effects of high -frequency traffic on low -input bentgrass/annual bluegrass fairways (W atkins et al., 2010) (Table 5) 26 Table 3. Effects of sand topdressing and rolling frequency on percentag e plot surface area affected by dollar spot disease z. East Lansing, MI 2011. 2011 Treatment Percentage of plot surface area affected by dollar spot disease (0 -100%) 19 Aug 22 Aug 2 Sep 10 Sep Soil Type (S) Sand Topdress y 9.5 17.1 21.4 28.8 Native S oil x 22.8 27.9 37.2 43.2 Significance (P = 0.05) w * * * * Rolling Frequency (R) v 0x/wk 16.0 21.3 34.0 a u 39.8 1x/wk 16.5 22.7 31.5 ab 38.2 3x/wk 16.2 24.0 28.3 bc 34.0 5x/wk 15.8 22.0 23.3 c 31.8 LSD (P = 0.05) NS NS 5.2 NS S x R NS NS * NS z Causal pathogen , Rutstroemia floccossum syn. Sclerotinia homoeocarpa F.T. Bennett y Sand applied biweekly, May to September, at a rate of 11.2 m 3 ha-1. x Capac loam soil particle analysis of 50% sand, 24% silt and 26% clay with a 7.8 pH i ndex. w * and NS indicate significant and not significant at the 0.05 level of probability, respectively. v Vibratory -rollers (38.6 kg unit -1) on a triplex -mower (590.9 kg); vertical force value of 0.32 kg cm-2. u Within columns, means followed by the sam e letter not significantly; FisherÕs least significant difference at P = 0.05. 27 bc c d d a ab a abc 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 0x/wk 1x/wk 3x/wk 5x/wk % Plot Surface Area Affected by Dollar Spot Disease z Rolling Treatment y Sand Topdress Native Soil Figure 1. Effects of sand topdressing x rolling frequency on percentage plot surface area affected by dollar spot disease observed on September 2, 2011. East Lansing, MI. z Causal pathogen , Rutstroemia floccossum syn. Sclerotinia homoeocarpa F.T. Bennett. y Vibratory-rollers (38.6 kg unit -1) on a triplex-mower (590.9 kg); vertical force value of 0.32 kg cm -2. Sand applied biweekly, May to September, at a rate of 11.2 m 3 ha-1. Capac loam (native) soil particle analysis of 50% sand, 24% silt and 26% clay with a 7.8 pH index. Columns with the same letter not significantly different; Tukey-Kramer Grouping at P = 0.05. 28 Table 4. Effects of sand topdressing and rolling frequency on percentage plot surface area affected by dollar spot disease z. East Lansing, MI 2012. 2012 Treatment Per centage of plot surface area affected by dollar spot disease (0-100%) 6 July 28 July 10 Aug 25 Aug 3 Sep Soil Type (S) Sand Topdress y 5.8 20.6 17.1 15.9 19.1 Native Soil x 2.3 16.2 17.7 13.8 22.2 Significance (P = 0.05) w NS NS NS NS NS Rolling Frequency (R) v 0x/wk 1.8 14.8 13.5 a u 10.7 a 16.7 1x/wk 5.8 16.8 14.8 a 10.8 ab 18.0 3x/wk 3.8 17.7 19.3 ab 16.7 bc 21.8 5x/wk 4.8 24.2 21.8 b 21.3 c 26.0 LSD (P = 0.05) NS NS 5.9 5.9 NS S x R NS NS NS NS NS z Causal pathogen , Rutstroemia floccossum syn. Sclerotinia homoeocarpa F.T. Bennett y Sand applied biweekly, May to September, at a rate of 11.2 m 3 ha-1. x Capac loam soil particle analysis of 50% sand, 24% silt and 26% clay with a 7.8 pH index. w * and NS indicate signif icant and not significant at the 0.05 level of probability, respectively. v Vibratory -rollers (38.6 kg unit -1) on a triplex -mower (590.9 kg); vertical force value of 0.32 kg cm-2. u Within columns, means followed by the same letter not significantly differ ent; FisherÕs least significant difference at P =0.05. 29 Table 5. Seasonal precipitation amounts received at the Ha ncock Turfgrass Research Center. East Lansing, MI; June -September 2011 -2014. Year cm 2011 24.8 2012 11.7 2013 28.0 2014 28.8 Latitud e: 42.7110 deg. Longitude: -84.4760 deg. Elevation: 256.64 m Data provided by the Michigan Automated Weather Network (MAWN) and Enviro -weather Program, Michigan State University. 30 Main effects of sand topdressing and rolling frequency were ob served on several collection dates in 2013. A significant sand topdressing x rolling frequency interaction effect was also observed at this time (Table 6). When compared to the control, the sand -topdressing treatment notably reduced dollar spot disease in cidence by 34% and 66% on August 21 and 30 respectively. Moreover, during this time period, we experienced ideal climatic conditions for an epidemic of dollar spot (Table 7). Despite this fact, the 5x weekly rolling treatment resulted in lower percentage p lot surface area affected by dollar spot disease in comparison to the control and the 1 and 3x weekly rolling treatments on August 21. Furthermore, the sand topdressing x rolling frequency interaction helped us determine that as rolling frequency was incre ased on the sand -topdressed plots, dollar spot severity subsided when compared to the native soil plots that received the same rolling treatments (Figure 2). Once again validating previous statements that sand topdressing and rolling applications can alle viate turf disease severity. Main effect of sand topdressing was observed in 2014; however, main effect of rolling frequency was not observed throughout the entirety of the data collection period. Only one date resulted in a significant treatment effect o n dollar spot with the sand -topdressed plots less dollar spot incidence than the control (Table 8). Effects on Turfgrass Quality Significant main effects of sand topdressing and rolling frequency on turfgrass quality were observed in 2011. A significant sand topdressing x rolling frequency interaction effect was also observed during the data collection period (Table 9). 31 Table 6. Effects of sand topdressing and rolling frequency on percentage plot surface area affected by dollar spot disease z. East Lan sing, MI 2013. 2013 Treatment Percentage of plot surface area affected by dollar spot disease (0-100%) 27 June 22 July 21 Aug 30 Aug 10 Sep Soil Type (S) Sand Topdress y 5.2 23.8 11.8 4.3 2.6 Native Soil x 3.9 24.2 17.8 12.7 4.7 Significance ( P = 0.05) w NS NS * * NS Rolling Frequency (R) v 0x/wk 3.8 26.7 a u 20.8 a 12.2 a 4.5 1x/wk 4.5 26.7 a 14.2 b 8.3 ab 2.8 3x/wk 5.3 24.2 a 14.7 b 7.8 ab 3.8 5x/wk 4.5 18.3 b 9.7 c 5.7 b 3.3 LSD (P = 0.05) NS 4.0 3.9 4.5 NS S x R NS NS * NS NS z Causal pathogen , Rutstroemia floccossum syn. Sclerotinia homoeocarpa F.T. Bennett y Sand applied biweekly, May to September, at a rate of 11.2 m 3 ha-1. x Capac loam soil particle analysis of 50% sand, 24% silt and 26% clay with a 7. 8 pH index. w * and NS indicate significant and not significant at the 0.05 level of probability, respectively. v Vibratory -rollers (38.6 kg unit -1) on a triplex -mower (590.9 kg); vertical force value of 0.32 kg cm -2. u Within columns, means followed by the same letter not significantly different; FisherÕs least significant difference at P = 0.05. 32 Table 7. Seasonal climatic conditions experienced at the Hancock Turfgrass Research Center. East Lansing, MI 2013. Date Air Temperature (C¡) Precipitation Relative Humidity (%) Max. Min. cm Max. Min. 20 Aug 28.6 14.8 --- 91.5 22.9 21 Aug 29.2 17.5 --- 89.7 42.8 22 Aug 26.1 17.9 0.58 90.0 56.9 23 Aug 27.0 15.0 --- 88.1 21.4 24 Aug 27.4 11.5 --- 92.8 33.8 25 Aug 28.8 13.7 --- 91.5 47.5 26 Aug 28.6 20.0 --- 86.4 57.7 27 Aug 30.2 20.9 4.34 92.5 62.1 28 Aug 27.9 19.3 3.56 92.8 58.0 29 Aug 31.3 16.4 --- 94.1 42.0 30 Aug 29.5 19.1 0.33 90.7 54.0 Latitude: 42.7110 deg. Longitude: -84.4760 deg. Elevation: 256.64 m Data provided by the Michiga n Automated Weather Network (MAWN) and Enviro -weather Program, Michigan State University. 33 a cd c d a ab ab bc 0 5 10 15 20 25 0x/wk 1x/wk 3x/wk 5x/wk % Plot Surface Area Affected by Dollar Spot Disease z Rolling Treatment y Sand Topdress Native Soil Figure 2. Effects of sand topdressing x rolling frequency on percentage plot surface area affected by dollar spot disease observed on August 21, 2013. East Lansing, MI. z Causal pathogen , Rutstroemia floccossum syn. Sclerotinia homoeocarpa F.T. Bennett. y Vibratory-rollers (38.6 kg unit -1) on a triplex-mower (590.9 kg); vertical force value of 0.32 kg cm -2. Sand applied biweekly, May to September, at a rate of 11.2 m 3 ha-1. Capac loam (native) soil particle analysis of 50% sand, 24% silt and 26% clay with a 7.8 pH index. Columns with the same letter not significantly different; Tukey-Kramer Grouping at P = 0.05. 34 Table 8. Effects of sand topdressing and rolling frequency on percentage plot surface area affected by dollar spot disease z. East Lansing, MI 2014. 2014 Treatment Percentage of plot surface area affected by dollar spot disease (0-100%) 26 June 17 July 11 Aug 25 Aug 2 Sep Soil Type (S) Sand Topdress y 4.7 14.3 5.7 5.8 7.6 Native Soil x 2.5 10.3 11.1 10.8 7.7 Significance (P = 0.05) w NS NS NS * NS Rolling Frequency (R) v 0x/wk 3.2 13.2 10.0 9.7 8.3 1x/wk 5.5 10.3 7.5 7.2 7.8 3x/wk 3.0 15.8 9.7 9.3 7.8 5x/wk 2.8 9.7 6.3 6.8 6.5 LSD (P = 0.05) NS NS NS NS NS S x R NS NS NS NS NS z Causal pathogen , Rutstroemia floccossum syn. Scle rotinia homoeocarpa F.T. Bennett y Sand applied biweekly, May to September, at a rate of 11.2 m 3 ha-1. x Capac loam soil particle analysis of 50% sand, 24% silt and 26% clay with a 7.8 pH index. w * and NS indicate significant and not significant at th e 0.05 level of probability, respectively. v Vibratory -rollers (38.6 kg unit -1) on a triplex -mower (590.9 kg) ; vertical force value of 0.32 kg cm -2. u Within columns, means followed by the same letter not significantly different; FisherÕs least significan t difference at P = 0.05. 35 Table 9. Effects of sand topdressing and rolling frequency on turfgrass quality. East Lansing, MI 2011. 2011 Treatment Turfgrass Quality (1 -9) z 19 Aug 22 Aug 2 Sep 10 Sep Soil Type (S) Sand Topdress y 7.1 6.4 7.0 6.8 Native Soil x 5.0 4.8 4.7 4.3 Significance (P = 0.05) w * * * * Rolling Frequency (R) v 0x/wk 6.2 5.8 5.3 a u 5.0 1x/wk 6.0 5.5 5.2 a 5.3 3x/wk 5.8 5.3 6.2 ab 5.5 5x/wk 6.2 5.7 6.7 b 6.2 LSD (P = 0.05) NS NS 1.1 NS S x R NS NS NS * z Quality based on a 1 (dead or poor) to 9 (best) rating scale with 6 being acceptable. y Sand applied biweekly, May to September, at a rate of 11.2 m 3 ha-1. x Capac loam soil particle analysis of 50% sand, 24% silt and 26% clay with a 7.8 pH index. w * and NS indicate significant and not significant at the 0.05 level of probability, respectively. v Vibratory -rollers (38.6 kg unit -1) on a triplex -mower (590.9 kg); vertical force value of 0.32 kg cm -2. u Within columns, means followed by the same letter not significantly different; FisherÕs least significant difference at P = 0.05. 36 The sand topdressing treatment produced a notable increase in turfgrass quality when compared to the control, native soil plots. Significant differences among rolling treatmen ts were only observed on September 2, 2011. The 5x weekly rolling treatment had a significant effect on turfgrass quality when compared to the 1x weekly rolling treatment and control. A sand topdressing x rolling frequency interaction, observed on Septembe r 10, revealed that as rolling frequency was increased on the sand topdressed plots, turfgrass quality was likewise increased when compared to the native soil plots that received the same rolling treatments (Figure 3). Main effects of sand topdressi ng were not significant in 2012; however, main effects of rolling frequency were significant on one collection date. Turfgrass quality was adversely affected on the plots that received the higher frequency, 3 and 5x weekly rolling treatments (Table 10). Th e persistently hot, dry weather conditions of the 2012 -growing season, nevertheless, affected turfgrass quality results despite our efforts to supply adequate irrigation amounts to the research site. Moreover, our observations support earlier statements th at drought -stressed turf is more susceptible to a plethora of turf diseases that in effect cause a marked decrease of turfgrass quality. Main effects of sand topdressing and rolling frequency on turfgrass quality wer e observed in 2013 (Table 11). San d topdressed plots had higher turfgrass quality indices when compared to the control. Additionally, plots that received the 3 and 5x weekly rolling treatments had higher turfgrass quality ratings in comparison to the control on two data collection periods in August. Surprisingly, on August 30 and September 10, the plots that received the 1x weekly rolling treatment had higher turf quality ratings when compared to the control. 37 bc b a a cd bcd d cd 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0x/wk 1x/wk 3x/wk 5x/wk Turfgrass Quality (1-9) z Rolling Treatment y Sand Topdress Native Soil Figure 3. Effects of sand topdressing x rolling frequency on turfgrass quality observed on Sep. 10, 2011. East Lansing, MI. z Quality based on a 1 (dead or poor) to 9 (best) scale with 6 being acceptable. y Vibratory-rollers (38.6 kg unit -1) on a triplex-mower (590.9 kg); vertical force value of 0.32 kg cm -2. Sand applied biweekly, May to September, at a rate of 11.2 m 3 ha-1. Capac loam (native) soil particle analysis of 50% sand, 24% silt and 26% clay with a 7.8 pH index. Columns with the same letter not significantly different; Tukey-Kramer Grouping at P = 0.05. 38 Table 10. Effects of sand topdressing and rolling frequency on turfgrass quality . East Lansing, MI 2012. 2012 Treatment Turfgrass Quality (1 -9) z 24 June 13 July 10 Aug 16 Sep Soil Type (S) Sand Topdress y 7.2 6.6 5.5 5.8 Native Soil x 6.3 5.5 4.9 5.1 Significance (P = 0.05) w NS NS NS NS Rolling Frequency (R) v 0x/wk 6.7 5.5 5.7 a u 5.5 1x/wk 6.7 6.0 6.0 a 5.7 3x/wk 7.0 6.3 4.7 b 5.0 5x/wk 6.7 6.3 4.5 b 5.5 LSD (P = 0.05) NS NS 0.9 NS S x R NS NS NS NS z Quality based on a 1 (dead or poor) to 9 (best) rating scale with 6 being acceptable. y Sand applied biwe ekly, May to September, at a rate of 11.2 m 3 ha-1. x Capac loam soil particle analysis of 50% sand, 24% silt and 26% clay with a 7.8 pH index. w * and NS indicate significant and not significant at the 0.05 level of probability, respectively. v Vibratory -rollers (38.6 kg unit -1) on a triplex -mower (590.9 kg); vertical force value of 0.32 kg cm -2. u Within columns, means followed by the same letter not significantly different; FisherÕs least significant difference at P = 0.05. 39 Table 11. Effects of sa nd topdressing and rolling frequency on turfgrass quality. East Lansing, MI 2013. 2013 Treatment Turfgrass Quality (1 -9) z 24 June 17 Aug 30 Aug 10 Sep Soil Type (S) Sand Topdress y 5.4 5.2 6.7 6.3 Native Soil x 5.7 4.4 4.2 5.7 Significance (P = 0.0 5) w NS NS * NS Rolling Frequency (R) v 0x/wk 5.8 4.0 a 4.5 a u 5.3 a 1x/wk 5.7 4.8 ab 5.7 b 6.3 bc 3x/wk 5.2 5.0 b 5.5 b 5.8 ab 5x/wk 5.5 5.5 b 6.0 b 6.5 c LSD (P = 0.05) NS 0.8 0.97 0.5 S x R NS NS NS NS z Quality based on a 1 (d ead or poor) to 9 (best) rating scale with 6 being acceptable. y Sand applied biweekly, May to September, at a rate of 11.2 m 3 ha-1. x Capac loam soil particle analysis of 50% sand, 24% silt and 26% clay with a 7.8 pH index. w * and NS indicate signific ant and not significant at the 0.05 level of probability, respectively. v Vibratory -rollers (38.6 kg unit -1) on a triplex -mower (590.9 kg); vertical force value of 0.32 kg cm -2. u Within columns, means followed by the same letter not significantly differe nt; FisherÕs least significant difference at P = 0.05. 40 Significant main effects of sand topdressing and rolling frequency on turfgrass quality were observed in 2014 (Table 12). Two dates, August 11 and 25, resulted in significant treatment effects on tur fgrass quality with the sand topdressed plots having had better quality ratings than the control, native soil plots. Only one data collection date resulted in significant rolling frequency treatment effects on turfgrass quality; the 5x weekly rolling treat ment produced the highest quality rating when compared to the 3x weekly rolling treatment and control. 41 Table 12. Effects of sand topdressing and rolling frequency on turfgrass quality. East Lansing, MI 2014. 2014 Treatment Turfgrass Quality (1 -9) z 28 July 11 Aug 25 Aug 9 Sep Soil Type (S) Sand Topdress y 6.9 5.9 6.0 5.9 Native Soil x 6.0 4.1 4.8 5.9 Significance (P = 0.05) w NS * * NS Rolling Frequency (R) v 0x/wk 6.2 a 4.7 5.2 5.8 1x/wk 6.7 ab 5.2 5.5 6.0 3x/wk 5.8 a 4.7 5.2 5.8 5x/wk 7.2 b 5.5 5.7 6.0 LSD (P = 0.05) 0.9 NS NS NS S x R NS NS NS NS z Quality based on a 1 (dead or poor) to 9 (best) rating scale with 6 being acceptable. y Sand applied biweekly, May to September, at a rate of 11.2 m 3 ha-1. x Capac loam soil partic le analysis of 50% sand, 24% silt and 26% clay with a 7.8 pH index. w * and NS indicate significant and not significant at the 0.05 level of probability, respectively. v Vibratory -rollers (38.6 kg unit -1) on a triplex -mower (590.9 kg); vertical force valu e of 0.32 kg cm -2. u Within columns, means followed by the same letter not significantly different; FisherÕs least significant difference at P = 0.05. 42 CONCLUSIONS In most instances, the sand topdressing treatment decreased dollar spot severity and increased turfgrass quality. Similar to our observation, Skorulski et al. (2010) noticed that the severity of infection was reduced by sand topdressing. Their results also indicated that sand topdressing increased fairway turfgrass quality, color, and den sity. Hempfling et al. (2015) observed decreased anthracnose ( Colletotrichum cereale Manns sensu lato Crouch, Clarke, and Hillman) (Crouch et al., 2006) on an annual bluegrass ( Poa annua L.) fairway that was sand topdressed in spring and summer. Some resea rchers have speculated that the shape of sand and the topdressing incorporation method exacerbate turf disease severity response, but Inguagiato et al. (2013) found that neither the sand shape, nor the method of incorporation enhanced anthracnose severity. Moreover, they noticed that routine sand topdressing reduced disease severity on annual bluegrass putting greens. In another study, Inguagiato et al. (2012) found that comparatively low sand rates applied at short intervals substantially reduced anthracno se disease severity. Perhaps seasonal accumulations of sand topdressing not only dilutes thatch, Òa layer of intermingled living and dead stems and roots above the soil surfaceÓ (Beard, 1973), but also dilutes the fungal stroma of dollar spot by and which is the primary means of pathogen survival and dissemination (Vargas, 2005). Our research efforts determined that rolling frequency treatments significantly affected disease incidence on fairway turf; however, the 5x weekly rolling treatment appeared to be the most efficacious, and in most instances, had the lowest percentage plot surface area affected by dollar spot when compared to the control and the 1 and 3x weekly rolling treatments. These results support the findings of Nikolai et al. (2001) that rolli ng at least three times per week not only increased green speeds, but also, unexpectedly, reduced dollar spot incidence in creeping bentgrass. Giordano et al. (2012) found that rolling 5x weekly, whether in the early morning, or in the afternoon, and eithe r once or twice daily, significantly reduced dollar spot severity when compared to the control. Rolling 43 has also been found to decrease the severity of anthracnose caused by Colletotrichum cereale (Inguagiato et al., 2009) Nevertheless, no research, excep ting our study, has attempted to address lightweight rolling effects on fairway turf, particularly the mechanism involved in dollar spot suppression. The major differences between a fairway turf and a putting green turf is the height of cut, and more or le ss, the intensity of cultural practices that affect the amount of thatch present in the respective areas. In most circumstances a putting green, in comparison to a fairway having the same composition of turfg rasses, will have less thatch. Therefore, rollin g intensity and the mechanical forces involved in rolling might have to be greater in order to induce an effect on the edaphic environment of fairway turfgrass. This may explain why the highest rolling frequency was the most effective treatment for suppres sing dollar spot disease in our study. Some people believe leaf guttation and dew provide sustenance for pathogens (Monteith and Dahl, 1932; Williams et al., 1996), and while it has been shown that displacement of leaf surface moisture has some effect on disease incidence (Williams et al., 1996; Settle et al., 2001; Delvalle et al., 2011) others have challenged this theory and provided evidence to suggest that daily lightweight rolling may induce some kind of Òbiological or physiological mechanismÓ whereby reductions of dollar spot are evident and substantial (Giordano et al., 2012). Since rolling affects soil porosity (Beard, 1973; Ball et al., 1988) and increases the matric potential of soil without an increase in mass of water (Hillel, 1998), sand -based rootzone mediums can benefit from certain compaction operations like rolling (Nikolai et al., 2001; Giordano et al., 2012). The mechanism by which rolling is suppressive to the dollar spot pathogen could be attributed the effect of proper soil moisture lev el on avoidance of drought -stress related disease epidemics (Couch and Bloom, 1960; Couch, 1966). These findings are in agreement with the research of Nikolai et al. (2001) and Giordano et al. (2012), in that they observed greater differences between the rolled and non -rolled plots in regard to water 44 holding capacity, disease severity and turfgrass quality. In that manner, Òrolling consistently resulted in lower disease severity as well as superior turfgrass quality ratingsÓ (Giordano et al., 2012). 45 REFERENCES 46 REFERENCES Ball, B.C., M.F. OÕSullivan, and R. Hunter. 1988. Gas diffusion, flow fluid, and derived pore continuity indices in relation to vehicle traffic and tillage. J. Soil Sci. 39: 327 -339. Beard, J.B. 1973. Turfgrass: Science and Culture. Prentice -Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, NJ. Beard. J.B., H.J. Beard, and J.C. Beard. 2014. History of golf course turfgrass development. p. 65. In Turfgrass History and Literature: Lawns, Sports, an d Golf. Michigan State University Press, East Lansing, MI. Bengeyfield, B. 1962. Top dressing putting greens: old fashioned or not? The Bull Sheet. June. 15(12): 3 -6. Crouch, J.A., B.B. Clarke, and B.I. Hillman. 2006. Unraveling evolutionary relationsh ips among the divergent lineages of Colletotrichum causing anthracnose disease in turfgrass and corn. Phytopathology. 96: 46 -60. Delvalle, T.C., P.J. Landschoot, and J.E. Kaminski. 2011. Effects of dew removal and mowing frequency on fungicide performanc e for dollar spot control. Plant Disease . November. 95(11): 1427 -1432. Dykema, N.M. 2014. Impact of irrigation regime and host cultivar on dollar spot of creeping bentgrass. M.S. diss. Michigan State University. East Lansing, MI. Ferguson, M. 1968. Evolu tion of a putting green. USGA Green Section Record. May. 6(1): 1 -4. Giordano, P.R., T.A. Nikolai, J.M. Vargas, Jr., and R. Hammerschmidt. 2012. Timing and frequency effects of lightweight rolling on dollar spot disease in creeping bentgrass putting greens . Crop Sci. June 52:1371 -1378. Goodman, D.M., and L.L. Burpee. 1991. Biological control of dollar spot disease of creeping bentgrass. Phytopathology 81: 1438 -1446. Hall, J.H. 1978. Avoid the temptation of sand topdressing. Mid -Atlantic Newsletter. Novem ber. 31(11): 3 -5. Hillel, D. 1998. Soil dynamics: stress, strain, and strength. p. 376. In Environmental Soil Physics. Academic Press. San Diego, Ca. Hempfling, J.W., B.B. Clarke, and J.A. Murphy. 2015. Anthracnose on annual bluegrass as influenced by spring and summer topdressing. Crop Sci. 55: 437 -443. 47 Inguagiato, J.C., J.A. Murphy, and B.B. Clarke. 2009. Anthracnose disease and annual bluegrass putting green performance affected by mowing and lightweight rolling. Crop Sci . July/August. 49(4): 1454 -1462. Inguagiato, J.C., J.A. Murphy, and B.B. Clarke. 2012. Sand topdressing rate and interval effects on anthracnose severity of an annual bluegrass putting green. Crop Sci . May/June. 52(3): 1406 -1415. Inguagiato, J.C., J.A. Murphy, and B.B. Clarke. 201 3. Topdressing sand particle shape and incorporation effects on anthracnose severity of an annual bluegrass putting green. Int. Turfgrass Soc. Res. J. 12: 127 -133. Madison, J.H. 1981. Frequent sand topdressing vital tonic for greens. Golf Course Managemen t. August. 49(7): 17, 19 -20. Moncrief, J.B. 1977. The outlook for turf. USGA Green Section Record. January. 15(1): 1 -5. Monteith, J. and A.S. Dahl. 1932. Turf diseases and their control. Bulletin of the USGA Green Section. 12(4): 137 -138. National Go lf Foundation (NGF). 2013. 2012 Golf course openings and closures update. Dashboard: Market Intelligence for GolfÕs Stakeholders. February. Vol. 4 (2). National Turfgrass Evaluation Program. 2015. Guidelines for turfgrass evaluation. June 2015. (http://ww w.ntep.org). Nikolai, T.A., P.E. Rieke, J.N. Rogers, III, and J.M. Vargas, Jr. 2001. Turfgrass and soil responses to lightweight rolling on putting green root zone mixes. Int. Turfgrass Soc. Res. J. 9(2): 604 -609. Powell, J. and J.M. Vargas, Jr. 2001. Ve getative compatibility and seasonal variation among isolates of Sclerotinia homoeocarpa . Plant Disease. 85: 377 -381. Roberts, J.A., J.A. Murphy, and B.B. Clarke. 2012. Lightweight rolling effects on anthracnose of annual bluegrass putting greens. Agron. J . 104(4): 1176 -1181. Settle, D, J. Fry, and N. Tisserat. 2001. Effects of irrigation frequency on brown patch in perennial ryegrass. Int. Turfgrass Soc. Res. J. 9(2): 710 -714. Skorulski, J., J. Henderson, and N. Miller. 2010. Topdressing fairways: more is better. USGA green section record . March/April. 48(2): 15 -17. Vargas, J.M., Jr. 2005. Fungal diseases of turfgrass, I: diseases primarily occurring on golf course turfs. p. 19 -22. In Management of Turfgrass Diseases. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Hoboken, NJ . 48 Watkins, E., A.B. Hollman, and B.P. Horgan. 2010. Evaluation of alternative turfgrass species for low -input golf course fairways. HortSci. 45: 113 -118. Westfall, P.H., R.D. Tobias, D. Rom, R.D. Wolfinger, and Y. Hochberg. 1999. Multiple Comparisons and Multiple Tests Using the SAS System. SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC. Williams, D.W., A.J. Powell, Jr., P. Vincelli, and C.T. Dougherty. 1996. Dollar Spot on bentgrass influenced by displacement of leaf surface moisture, nitrogen, and clipping removal. Cr op Sci. 36: 1304 -1309. 49 CHAPTER 2 : EFFECTS OF LIGHTWEIGHT ROLLING AND SAND TOPDRESSING ON THE EFFICACY OF FUNGICIDE APPLICATION RATES FOR THE REDUCTION OF DOLLAR SPOT DISEASE IN A GOLF COURSE FAIRWAY ABSTRACT Dollar spot ( Sclerotini a homoeocarpa F.T. Bennett), the most common turfgrass disease in the upper Midwest, affects turfgrass quality, decreases golf course playability, and results in millions of dollars spent on frequent fungicide applications. We hypothesized that a combinati on of lightweight rolling and sand topdressing would increase fungicide efficacy to reduce dollar spot disease in a golf course fairway. Our objective was to examine dollar spot severity responses on an Agrostis stolonifera L. and Poa annua L. fairway to c ombinations of lightweight rolling, sand topdressing, and different fungicide application rates. The study was conducted in 2013 and 2014 at the Hancock Turfgrass Research Center, Michigan State University using a strip -split -plot design, and treatments co nsisted of boscalid fungicide at 0.14, 0.14 + 0.14, 0.28, 0.28 + 0.28, 0.56, and 0.56 + 0.56 kg ha -1 month -1, rolling 3x weekly, sand topdressing, and controls. Infection was visually estimated. All monthly fungicide applications improved normalized differ ence vegetation index (NDVI) and turf quality responses compared to the control. Moreover, rolling on the no fungicide plots and sand topdressing improved turf quality and reduced dollar spot incidence. 50 INTRODUCTION Dollar spot is a foliar diseas e of turfgrass that causes significant injury if left untreated. The causal pathogen, Rutstroemia floccossum syn. Sclerotinia homoeocarpa F.T. Bennett (Smiley et al., 1992), infects a wide range of warm - and cool -season grasses throughout the United States (Vargas, 2005); however, severe disease epidemics can occur in turfgrasses of the upper Midwest as a result of environmental conditions and turfgrass cultural regimes that favor disease outbreak. Millions of dollars are spent in efforts to manage do llar spot on golf courses (Vargas, 2005), and turf managers can choose from a variety of fungicides that suppress dollar spot disease symptoms; however, they generally limit applications of these chemicals due to economic, environmental, and fungicide resi stance concerns (Delvalle et al., 2011). Additionally, with the rising cost and looming ban of certain chemical pesticides, turf managers are seeking alternative yet inexpensive means of controlling turf diseases. The ever popular, and the most effective fungicide in the turf industry, chlorothalonil (McDonald et al., 2006), is one of a variety of fungicides, insecticides, and herbicides listed in the lawsuit filed by several Northwest Pacific Environment Coalitions against the Environmental Protection Age ncy (EPA, 2011). The pending lawsuit could result in the ultimate demise of chlorothalonil from the disease management regimes of not only turf managers, but also farmers and horticulturalists alike. Studies have found that chlorothalonil transport by rain fall/runoff can be substantial (King and Balogh, 2013). Upon application, chlorothalonil persists in the ecosystem and concentrations in discharge water have been observed to adversely affect egg production and survival rate of certain fish (Davies and Whi te, 1985), hence the potential ban and loss of this product from the market. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA, 1999) estimated that upwards of 680,000 kilograms of chlorothalonil were applied in both recreational and golf course turf in 1999 t o 2000. Chlorothalonil is inexpensive, provides broad -spectrum control of numerous foliar diseases, and is less likely to cause pathogen resistance, which 51 can occur in many site -specific, systemic fungicide groups (Warren et al., 1974; Detweiler et al., 1983; Golembiewski et al., 1995). Therefore, if the EPA bans chlorothalonil then an effective and affordable alternative must be sought for the control of dollar spot disease in turfgrass . A recent study examining the effects of golf course fairway mowing frequency and dew removal on fungicide efficacy for dollar spot control showed that as mowing frequency was increased from 2 to 6 days weekly disease severity was abated across all fungicide treatments (Delvalle et al., 2011). Moreover, Delvalle et al. (2 011) have documented associations between turf cultural practices and the efficacy of certain fungicides. They found that daily (7 days week -1) dew removal increased the number of days needed to reach a disease threshold value when compared to fungicide tr eatments (chlorothalonil, 8.2 kg a.i. ha -1; propiconazole, 0.7 kg a.i. ha -1; and iprodione, 2.1 kg a.i. ha -1) in which dew was not removed. In this study, a Toro ReelMaster 5400 -D fairway mower (The Toro Company. Bloomington, MN) was not only used for the mowing treatments, but also used for the dew removal treatments by driving the mower across the plots with the cutting units lowered and disengaged. Depending on the model designation, this particular fairway mower may weigh between 1,136 and 1,186 kg with each cutting unit (5 units mower -1) weighing between 50 to 69 kg. Essentially, a force per unit area was being exerted upon the turfgrass and underlying rootzone, and therefore, being subjected to a lightweight rolling regime since all reel cutting units are equipped with rollers. Therefore, the mechanisms of disease suppression in turfgrass certainly involves something more than the removal or dispersal of surface dew and guttation fluid as elucidated by Williams et al. (1996). They observed significant r eduction of dollar spot after morning mowing and poling (mower unit disengaged and lowered) treatments on a putting green and a fairway turf compared to the afterno on mowing treatments. Conversely, Giordano et al. (2012) observed no difference between afte rnoon (after dew and guttation fluid dispersed) and morning rolling treatments in terms of dollar spot severity with both treatments resulting in significant dollar spot reductions compared to the control. A variety of research projects have shown that ro lling could 52 be used to decrease disease in turfgrass. Nikolai et al. (2001) and Giordano et al. (2013) concluded that rolling several times weekly increased turf quality and reduced dollar spot severity compared to non-rolled plots. Thus, rolling could be used to not only reduce the need for frequent fungicide applications, but also to increase the efficacy of conservative fungicide application rates. Very little research has been conducted to evaluate the effects of sand topdressing on fungicide efficacy. Datnoff et al. (2005) investigated the role of silicon in suppressing foliar diseases in warm -season grasses, and found that rootzone mixtures amended with calcium silicate slag (CaSiO 3) enhanced the resistance of both St. Augustinegrass ( Stenotaphrum sec undatum L.) and bermudagrass ( Cynodon dactylon L.) to foliar diseases. They also concluded that silicon could enhance fungicide usage at lower application rates. Although silicon is the second most abundant element in the crust and soils of the earth (Sava nt et al., 1997), plant -available silicon is in short supply. Even quartz sand (SiO 2) is lacking in plant -available silicon (Datnoff et al., 2005). Therefore, other suppression mechanisms must be at work in regard to a sand topdressing effect on disease occurrence in turf. Roberts and Murphy (2014) observed that sand topdressing applications on annual bluegrass putting greens reduced anthracnose ( Colletotrichum cereale Manns sensu lato Crouch, Clarke, and Hillman, 2006), and a combination of sand topdressin g and foot traffic (main plots received 327 foot steps m -2 daily; the walkers wore spiked -golf shoes, and had an average weight of 65 kg) resulted in the Òleast anthracnose and best overall turf quality over the course of their studyÓ. They also noted tha t despite greater soil bulk density indices, the plots that received foot traffic and sand topdressing treatments not only had higher turf quality, but also had lower disease occurrence compared to non -trafficked plots. This is in support of the observatio n of Giordano et al. (2012) whereby Òreduced dollar spot from lightweight rolling was associated with increased volumetric water content because drought stress has been observed to increase disease susceptibility in turfÓ. 53 Rolling and sand topdressing co uld have significant economic and environmental benefits if the effects of these practices on fungicide efficacy could be substantiated in this study as well as future research studies. Our objective was to examine the hypothesis regarding the effects of combinations of lightweight rolling, sand topdressing, and monthly fungicide application rates on dollar spot severity and turf quality responses on an Agrostis stolonifera L. and Poa annua L. fairway. Different rolling frequency, sand topdressing, and fun gicide application rate treatments were used in order to garner data that would help us validate this hypothesis. Therefore, our objective was to investigate the hypothesis that dollar spot severity would decrease and turf quality would increase by rolling and by sand topdressing, thereby enhancing fungicide usage at lower applications rates. 54 MATERIALS AND METHODS Field research was conducted from May through October in 2013 and 2014 at the Hancock Turfgrass Research Center, East Lansing, Michigan. The study evaluated the effects of combinations of soil type (sand topdressed and native soil), rolling frequency (0 and 3x weekly), and monthly fungicide application rates (0.14, 0.14 + 0.14, 0.28, 0.28 + 0.28, 0.56, and 0.56 + 0.56 kg ha -1) on dollar spot re duction in a golf course fairway. Our experimental site was a very large (3,252 m 2), mixed -stand fairway of annual bluegrass ( Poa annua L.) and creeping bentgrass (Agrostis stolonifera L. ÔPenncrossÕ) seeded in 2009. The soil on this site was a loam -textur ed native soil. This site was composed of six 542 m 2 experimental units; three blocks were sand topdressed while the remainders of the blocks were not sand topdressed (native soil). Also, within this site, ninety -six 1.2 x 1.8 m plots (16 plots per experi mental block) were randomly assigned a fungicide treatment Ñthe levels of fungicide were stripped across both levels of rolling within each level of soil type. Fairways were mowed (clippings not collected) three times weekly at 0.127 cm, and if no rain even ts occurred, 0.4 cm of water was applied in a single irrigation period from May to October. Moreover, herbicides and insecticides were applied seasonally as needed. Additionally, in attempts to minimize surface disruption and soil displacement, this site w as never core cultivated for the duration of the study. In order to discourage gray snow mold disease ( Typhula incarnata Lasch ex Fr., (syn. Typhula itoana Imai), azoxystrobin fungicide was applied at the end of each growing season. We chose this strobilu rin fungicide, a quinol oxidation inhibitor (QoI) with the chemical name of methyl (E) -2-{2-[6-(2-cyanophenoxy) pyrimidin -4yloxy] phenyl} 3 -methoxyacrylate, because QoI fungicides are not particularly effective at controlling asexual reproducing fungi like dollar spot (Godwin et al., 2002; Vincelli, 2002). Spore germination and zoospore motility are stages of fungal development that are particularly sensitive to QoI fungicides (Godwin et al., 2002). The dollar spot 55 pathogen is predominately an asexual repro ducer, surviving by disseminating mycelia around and upon the host plant (Smiley et al., 1992), and rarely producing spores in the field (Jackson, 1973; Baldwin and Newell, 1992). The fertilizer re gime consisted of a 28-0-0 (6.1 kg N ha -1) applied at 10 -d intervals; however, in 2013 and 2014, we supplemented our liquid fertilizer regime with several applications of polymer -coated, slow -release fertilizer 29 -0-10 (61.1 kg N ha -1): one on July 20, 2013, and another on June 7, 2014. A final supplemental ferti lizer application was once again a polymer -coated, slow -release 29 -2-9 (51.8 kg N ha -1) on August 29, 2014. In 2013 and 2014, to attain even coverage of dollar spot disease, all treatment plots were artificially inoculated using the Dykema (2014) protocol , which is a modification of the Goodman and Burpee (1991) technique. The concoction of silica sand, cornmeal, potato dextrose agar, and S. homoeocarpa ÔVCG -BÕ (Powell and Vargas, 2001) inoculum was applied at a rate of 440 kg ha -1 using a Gandy drop -sprea der (Model 36H13, Gandy Co, Owatonna, MN). For this study, we selected boscalid fungicide because of the moderate resistance risk, and the excellent control of dollar spot disease in turfgrass. This systemic fungicide has the chemical name of 3-pyridineca rboxamide, 2 -chloro -N- (4Õchloro[1,1 Ôbiphenyl] -2-yl, and is within the chemical group carboxamide/anilide. Fungicide treatments were initiated once dollar spot disease was active, and administered using a CO 2-powered backpack -boom-sprayer (R & D Sprayer, Bell Spray, Inc., Opelousas. LA) at 15 and 30 -d intervals. The plots were rolled 3 times weekly using True -Surface (Turfline, Inc. Moscow, MO) vibratory -roller units (38.6 kg unit -1) attached to a John Deere 2500A (Deere & Co. Moline, IL) triplex -mower (59 0.9 kg) with a swath of 1.6 m, and a vertical force value of 0.32 kg cm -2. Also, sand topdressing was applied biweekly from May to September using a Toro Topdresser 2500 (Toro Co., Bloomington, MN) at a rate of 11.2 m 3 ha-1, and over a four -year period of seasonal applications provided a 3.6 cm sand layer. 56 The percentage plot surface area affected by dollar spot lesions was visually rated on a scale of 0 to 100% on a weekly basis when symptoms occurred and the disease cycle was active. Turfgrass quality wa s visually assessed using methods established by the National Turfgrass Evaluation Program, Inc. (NTEP, Beltsville Agricultural Center, Beltsville, MD), whereas color, density, uniformity, texture, and biotic and abiotic stress constitute quality ratings based on a 1 (dead or poor) to 9 (best) rating scale, with 6 being acceptable. Chlorophyll content is a good indicator of plant health (Kruse et al., 2006); therefore, we used a normalized difference vegetation index meter (NDVI -TCM 500, Spectrum Technolog ies, Inc. Aurora, IL) to quantitatively evaluate turfgrass quality response. This instrument calculates an index value range from 0.000 to 1.000 with higher values indicative of healthier plants. The experimental design was strip -split -plot design with th ree replications. Treatment factors included monthly boscalid fungicide application rates of 0.14, 0.14 + 0.14, 0.28, 0.28 + 0.28, 0.56, and 0.56 + 0.56 kg ha -1; rolling 3x weekly, sand topdressing, and controls. The experimental data was analyzed using PR OC GLIMMIX procedure in SAS (version 9.3 and 9.4; SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, 2014). Main effects were different monthly fungicide application rates (whole plot), rolling (strip -plot) and sand topdressing (split -plot). Analysis of variance was used to d etermine significant effects (P<0.05), and when significant differences were detected, means were separated using Fisher Õs and Tukey -Kramer methods (Westfall et al., 1999). 57 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Effects on Dollar Spot Severity Main effects of fungic ide application rate on percentage plot surface area affected by dollar spot (causal pathogen, Rutstroemia floccossum syn. Sclerotinia homoeocarpa F.T. Bennett) lesions were significant; however, no differences between sand topdressing and rolling frequenc y were observed in 2013. When differences among fungicide application rate levels (0.14, 0.14 + 0.14, 0.28, 0.28 + 0.28, 0.56, and 0.56 + 0.56 kg ha -1 month -1) were observed, all treatments significantly reduced dollar spot disease compared to the control only on July 22 (Table 13). Nevertheless, the 0.14 kg ha -1month -1 application rate was as efficacious as the full, label recommended application rates of 0.56 and 0.56 + 0.56 kg ha -1 month -1. In 2014, monthly fungicide application rate produced a main effe ct on percentage plot surface area affected by dollar spot lesions, while no other main effects or interactions were significant. All fungicide application rates yielded the greatest reduction of dollar spot disease compared to the control (Table 14). On A ugust 25, the 0.28 + 0.28 kg ha -1month -1 application rate controlled dollar spot severity just as effectively as the 0.56 + 0.56 kg ha -1 month -1 application rate. Moreover, the 0.14 + 0.14 kg ha -1 month -1 application rate was just as efficacious as the ful l, label recommended application rate of 0.56 kg ha -1 month -1. Effects on Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) Significant main effects of monthly fungicide application rate and rolling frequency on normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) w ere observed in 2013, while sand topdressing and interaction effects were not significant. All fungicide application rates produced greater NDVI values when compared to the control (Table 15). Surprisingly, no differences were noticed between the lowest mo nthly application rate (14 kg ha -1) and the full, label recommended application rate (0.56 58 kg ha -1) on NDVI, and as the number of application increased over the season, little to no difference was noted among the treatment levels. Rolling frequency produce d differences in NDVI on one collection date in 2013, whereas rolling increased NDVI response compared to the control. 59 Table 13. Effects of sand topdressing, rolling frequency, and boscalid fungicide application rate on percentage plot surface area affecte d by dollar spot disease (Rutstroemia floccossum syn. Sclerotinia homoeocarpa F.T. Bennett). East Lansing, MI 2013. 2013 Treatment Percentage of plot surface area affected by dollar spot disease (0-100%) 22 July 6 Aug 17 Aug 21 Aug 10 Sep Soil Type (S) Sand Topdress z Native Soil y 7.9 4.2 4.3 4.5 4.0 5.2 3.6 3.6 1.2 1.4 LSD (P = 0.05) x NS NS NS NS NS Rolling Frequency (R) 0x/wk 3x/wk w 7.0 5.2 5.1 3.7 5.1 4.1 3.9 3.3 1.1 1.5 LSD (P = 0.05) NS NS NS NS NS Monthly Fungici de Application Rate: kg ha -1 (F) Control 0.14 0.14 + 0.14 0.28 0.28 + 0.28 0.56 0.56 + 0.56 18.7 a v 5.0 b 2.1 b 3.1 b 4.8 b 2.8 b 6.0 b 28.5 1.7 0.2 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 25.8 3.0 1.9 1.3 0.0 0.0 0.2 20.2 2.7 1.2 0.8 0.3 0.0 0.2 6.6 0.9 0.3 0.8 0.0 0.3 0.0 LSD (P = 0.05) 7.1 NS NS NS NS S x R NS NS NS NS NS S x F NS NS NS NS NS R x F NS NS NS NS NS S x R x F NS NS NS NS NS z Sand applied biweekly, May to September, at a rate of 11.2 m 3 ha-1. y Capac loam soil particle analysis of 50% s and, 24% silt and 26% clay with a 7.8 pH index. x * and NS indicate significant and not significant at the 0.05 level of probability, respectively w Vibratory -rollers (38.6 kg unit -1) on a triplex -mower (590.9 kg) vertical force value of 0.32 kg cm -2. v Within columns, means followed by the same letter not significantly different with FisherÕs least significant difference at P = 0.05. 60 Table 14. Effects of sand topdressing, rolling frequency, and boscalid fungicide application rate on percentage plot surfa ce area affected by dollar spot disease (Rutstroemia floccossum syn. Sclerotinia homoeocarpa F.T. Bennett). East Lansing, MI 2014. 2014 Treatment Percentage of plot surface area affected by dollar spot disease (0-100%) 28 July 4 Aug 11 Aug 18 Aug 25 Aug Soil Type (S) Sand Topdress z Native Soil y 1.4 1.1 1.2 0.9 1.6 1.6 3.7 3.0 5.3 5.2 LSD (P = 0.05) x NS NS NS NS NS Rolling Frequency (R) 0x/wk 3x/wk w 1.5 0.9 1.2 0.9 1.9 1.4 3.7 3.0 5.6 4.9 LSD (P = 0.05) NS NS NS NS NS Month ly Fungicide Application Rate: kg ha -1 (F) Control 0.14 0.14 + 0.14 0.28 0.28 + 0.28 0.56 0.56 + 0.56 4.9 2.4 0.0 1.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 7.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 8.8 2.2 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 13.4 7.0 0.0 2.4 0.0 0.5 0.0 16.1 a v 10.2 b 1.9 d 6.3 c 0.0 e 2.3 d 0.0 e LSD (P = 0.05) NS NS NS NS 1.7 S x R NS NS NS NS NS S x F NS NS NS NS NS R x F NS NS NS NS NS S x R x F NS NS NS NS NS z Sand applied biweekly, May to September, at a rate of 11.2 m 3 ha-1. y Capac loam soil particle analysis of 50% s and, 24% silt and 26% clay with a 7.8 pH index. x * and NS indicate significant and not significant at the 0.05 level of probability, respectively w Vibratory -rollers (38.6 kg unit -1) on a triplex -mower (590.9 kg) vertical force value of 0.32 kg cm -2. v Within columns, means followed by the same letter not significantly different with FisherÕs least significant difference at P = 0.05. 61 Table 15. Effects of sand topdressing, rolling frequency, and boscalid fungicide application rate on normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI range from 0.000 to 1.000 with higher values indicative of healthier plants). East Lansing, MI 2013. 2013 Treatment NDVI (0.000 to 1.000) 22 July 6 Aug 17 Aug 21 Aug 10 Sep Soil Type (S) Sand Topdress z Native Soil y 0.713 0.716 0.725 0.724 0.742 0.754 0.755 0.765 0.777 0.788 LSD (P = 0.05) x NS NS NS NS NS Rolling Frequency (R) 0x/wk 3x/wk w 0.711 0.717 0.726 0.723 0.751 0.745 0.767 0.753 0.784 0.781 LSD (P = 0.05) NS NS NS * NS Monthly Fungicide Application Rate: kg ha -1 (F) Control 0.14 0.14 + 0.14 0.28 0.28 + 0.28 0.56 0.56 + 0.56 0.654 a v 0.712 b 0.724 bc 0.725 bc 0.728 c 0.724 bc 0.731 c 0.668 a 0.724 b 0.736 bc 0.731 bc 0.733 bc 0.738 bc 0.744 c 0.6 89 a 0.752 b 0.759 bc 0.751 b 0.753 b 0.762 bc 0.772 c 0.722 a 0.759 b 0.768 b 0.764 b 0.774 b 0.768 b 0.760 b 0.754 a 0.783 b 0.789 b 0.783 b 0.789 b 0.791 b 0.790 b LSD (P = 0.05) 0.015 0.016 0.018 0.0 19 0.014 S x R NS NS NS NS NS S x F NS NS NS NS NS R x F NS NS NS NS NS S x R x F NS NS NS NS NS z Sand applied biweekly, May to September, at a rate of 11.2 m 3 ha-1. y Capac loam soil particle analysis of 50% sand, 24% silt and 26% clay with a 7.8 pH index. x * and NS indicate significant and not significant at the 0.05 level of probability, respectively w Vibratory -rollers (38.6 kg unit -1) on a triplex -mower (590.9 kg) vertical force value of 0.32 kg cm -2. v Within columns, means followed by the same letter not significantly different with FisherÕs least significant difference at P = 0.05. 62 In 2014, main effects of fungicide application rate and rolling frequency on NDVI were significant, while main effects of sand topdressing were not significant. H owever, we did observe significant interactions involving both rolling frequency x fungicide application rate, and sand topdressing x rolling frequency x fungicide application rate at this time. Similar to 2013 data results, all fungicide treatment levels effectively suppressed dollar spot disease and resulted in higher NDVI values when compared to the no fungicide, control treatment (Table 16). The August 25 data results suggest that bimonthly applications of the lowest fungicide rate (14 + 14 kg ha -1) wil l suppress dollar spot and increase turf health just as effectively as bimonthly applications of the full, label recommended rate (0.56 + 0.56 kg ha -1). Contrary to 2013 data results, the 3x weekly rolling treatment yielded the greatest NDVI response compa red to the no roll, control. These results are in agreement with Nikolai et al. (2001) in that the effect of lightweight rolling is cumulative in nature Ñthe benefits of rolling are a function of multi -season applications. A significant sand topdressing x rolling frequency x fungicide application rate occurred with variable and illogical means values. The interaction effects of soil type and fungicide application rate did not differ as a function of rolling frequency; however, the effect of rolling greatly influenced control plot NDVI response as a function of the sand topdressing treatment (Figure 4). Furthermore, a significant rolling frequency x fungicide application rate interaction occurred on one occasion with variable and illogical means values; how ever, the data results for the no fungicide, control plots support the claims of Nikolai et al. (2001) that rolling at least 3x weekly increases the turf quality and decreases the severity of dollar spot in putting greens (Figure 5). 63 Table 16. Effects of sand topdressing, rolling frequency, and boscalid fungicide application rate on normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI range from 0.000 to 1.000 with higher values indicative of healthier plants). East Lansing, MI 2014. 2014 Treatment NDVI (0.000 t o 1.000) 28 July 4 Aug 11 Aug 18 Aug 25 Aug Soil Type (S) Sand Topdress z Native Soil y 0.782 0.780 0.749 0.759 0.770 0.768 0.744 0.755 0.742 0.751 LSD (P = 0.05) x NS NS NS NS NS Rolling Frequency (R) 0x/wk 3x/wk w 0.777 0.784 0.752 0.756 0.767 0.771 0.748 0.751 0.748 0.745 LSD (P = 0.05) * NS NS NS NS Monthly Fungicide Application Rate: kg ha -1 (F) Control 0.14 0.14 + 0.14 0.28 0.28 + 0.28 0.56 0.56 + 0.56 0.782 0.785 0.778 0.783 0.779 0.779 0.779 0.737 a v 0.752 b 0.755 b 0.759 b 0.762 b 0.760 b 0.752 b 0.738 a 0.772 b 0.776 b 0.775 b 0.774 b 0.771 b 0.777 b 0.701 a 0.740 b 0.769 d 0.754 bc 0.763 cd 0.759 cd 0.760 cd 0.704 a 0.722 b 0.769 d 0.741 c 0.767 d 0.752 c 0.771 d LSD (P = 0.05) NS 0.012 0.010 0.016 0.014 S x R NS NS NS NS NS S x F NS NS NS NS NS R x F NS NS NS * NS S x R x F NS NS * NS NS z Sand applied biweekly, May to September, at a rate of 11.2 m 3 ha-1. y Capac loam soil particle anal ysis of 50% sand, 24% silt and 26% clay with a 7.8 pH index. x * and NS indicate significant and not significant at the 0.05 level of probability, respectively w Vibratory -rollers (38.6 kg unit -1) on a triplex -mower (590.9 kg) vertical force value of 0.32 kg cm -2. v Within columns, means followed by the same letter not significantly different with FisherÕs least significant difference at P = 0.05. 64 ef de a abc ab abc ab abc abc a abc ab ab a 0.650 0.675 0.700 0.725 0.750 0.775 0.800 Native Soil Sand Topdress Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) z 3x Weekly Rolling y control 0.14 0.14 + 0.14 0.28 0.28 + 0.28 0.56 0.56 + 0.56 Figure 4. Effects of sand topdressing x rolling frequency x fungicide application rate on NDVI, August 11, 2014. East Lansing, MI. z NDVI range from 0.000 to 1.000 with higher values indicative of healthier plants. y Vibratory-rollers (38.6 kg unit -1) on a triplex-mower (590.9 kg); vertical force value of 0.32 kg cm -2. Total monthly boscalid fungicide application rates in kg -1 ha-1. Sand applied biweekly, May to September, at a rate of 11.2 m 3 ha-1. Capac loam soil particle analysis of 50% sand, 24% silt and 26% clay with a 7.8 pH index. Columns with the same letter not significantly different; Tukey-Kramer Grouping at P = 0.05. de f abc bcd abc a abc ab abc abc cd ab abc ab 0.650 0.675 0.700 0.725 0.750 0.775 0.800 Native Soil Sand Topdress Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) 0x Weekly Rolling control 0.14 0.14 + 0.14 0.28 0.28 + 0.28 0.56 0.56 + 0.56 65 f e d cd a abc bcd abc abc abc abc abc ab bcd 0.650 0.675 0.700 0.725 0.750 0.775 0.800 0x/wk 3x/wk Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) z Rolling Treatment y control 0.14 0.14 + 0.14 0.28 0.28 + 0.28 0.56 0.56 + 0.56 Figure 5. Effects of rolling frequency x fungicide application rate on NDVI, August 18, 2014. East Lansing, MI. z NDVI range from 0.000 to 1.000 with higher values indicative of healthier plants. y Vibratory-rollers (38.6 kg unit -1) on a triplex-mower (590.9 kg); vertical force value of 0.32 kg cm -2. Total monthly boscalid fungicide application rates in kg -1 ha-1. Columns with the same letter not significantly different; Tukey-Kramer Grouping at P = 0.05. 66 Effects on Turfgrass Quality Significant main effects of rolling frequency and fungicide application r ate on turfgrass quality were observed in 2013, along with a significant rolling frequency x fungicide application rate interaction effect. Turfgrass quality was visually assessed and based on a 1 (poor or dead) to 9 (best) rating scale with 6 being accept able. On two collection dates, the 3x weekly rolling treatment significantly improved fairway turfgrass quality when compared to the plots that were not rolled albeit the control plots still yielded acceptable quality ratings (Table 17). On the other hand , all rating dates resulted in a significant effect on quality for all fungicide application rate treatments when compared to the control. The lowest application rate (14 kg ha -1 month -1) resulted in acceptable (6) turfgrass quality ratings particularly as the number of fungicide application increased over the growing season in 2013. A rolling frequency x fungicide application rate interaction effect was observed on August 6, 2013 (Figure 6). The data results suggest that the rolling treatment not only in creased the efficacy of the 14 kg ha -1 month -1 fungicide application rate, but also the 28 kg ha -1 month -1 rate. This effect on turf quality and fungicide efficacy was not observed in other boscalid application rate treatments. Main effects of rolling fr equency and fungicide application rate on turfgrass quality were observed in 2014. A significant sand topdressing x fungicide application rate interaction was also observed. Moreover, on two data dates, a sand topdressing x rolling frequency x fungicide application rate interaction occurred. Even though the non -rolled control plots maintained acceptable turf quality, the 3x weekly rolling treatment enhanced fairway turfgrass quality on two occasions (Table 18). Consistent with tendency and following the ov erall trend, all rating dates resulted in a significant effect on quality for all fungicide application rate treatments when compared to the control. 67 Table 17. Effects of sand topdressing, rolling frequency, and boscalid fungicide application on turfgra ss quality; visually assessed on a 1 (dead or poor) to 9 (best) rating scale with 6 being acceptable. East Lansing, MI 2013. 2013 Treatment Turfgrass Quality (1 -9) 22 July 6 Aug 17 Aug 21 Aug 10 Sep Soil Type (S) Sand Topdress z Native Soil y 6.5 7.1 7.5 7.5 7.7 7.6 7.7 7.8 8.2 8.2 LSD (P = 0.05) x NS NS NS NS NS Rolling Frequency (R) 0x/wk 3x/wk w 6.5 7.1 7.3 7.7 7.5 7.8 7.6 7.9 8.3 8.1 LSD (P = 0.05) * NS * NS NS Monthly Fungicide Application Rate: kg ha -1 (F) Control 0.14 0.14 + 0.14 0.28 0.28 + 0.28 0.56 0.56 + 0.56 3.0 a v 5.4 b 6.9 c 7.4 cd 7.8 d 8.6 e 8.6 e 3.4 a 7.2 b 8.1 c 8.0 c 8.6 d 8.4 cd 8.7 d 3.5 a 7.3 b 7.7 b 8.3 c 8.8 cd 8.8 cd 8.9 d 4.1 a 7.2 b 8.1 c 8.3 cd 8.7 de 9.0 e 8.7 e 5.3 a 8.2 b 8.7 bc 8.5 bc 8.9 bc 8.8 bc 9.0 c LSD (P = 0.05) 0.5 0.47 0.5 0.5 0.7 S x R NS NS NS NS NS S x F NS NS NS NS NS R x F NS * NS NS NS S x R x F NS NS NS NS NS z Sand applied biwee kly, May to September, at a rate of 11.2 m 3 ha-1. y Capac loam soil particle analysis of 50% sand, 24% silt and 26% clay with a 7.8 pH index. x * and NS indicate significant and not significant at the 0.05 level of probability, respectively w Vibratory -rol lers (38.6 kg unit -1) on a triplex -mower (590.9 kg) vertical force value of 0.32 kg cm -2. v Within columns, means followed by the same letter not significantly different with FisherÕs least significant difference at P = 0.05. 68 f f e d cd abcd d abc bcd ab bcd abc a abc 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0x/wk 3x/wk Turfgrass Quality (1-9) z Rolling Treatment y control 0.14 0.14 + 0.14 0.28 0.28 + 0.28 0.56 0.56 + 0.56 Figure 6. Effects of rolling frequency x fungicide application rate on turfgrass quality, August 6, 2013. East Lansing, MI. z Visually assessed on a 1 (poor or dead) to 9 (best) rating scale with 6 being acceptable. y Vibratory-rollers (38.6 kg unit -1) on a triplex-mower (590.9 kg); vertical force value of 0.32 kg cm -2. Total monthly boscalid fungicide application rates in kg -1 ha-1. Columns with the same letter not significantly different; Tukey-Kramer Grouping at P = 0.05. 69 Table 18. Effects of san d topdressing, rolling frequency, and boscalid fungicide application rate on turfgrass quality; visually assessed on a 1 (dead or poor) to 9 (best) rating scale with 6 being acceptable. East Lansing, MI 2014. 2014 Treatment Turfgrass Quality (1 -9) 28 Ju ly 4 Aug 11 Aug 18 Aug 25 Aug Soil Type (S) Sand Topdress z Native Soil y 7.5 7.6 7.8 7.8 7.9 7.8 7.0 7.0 6.6 6.7 LSD (P = 0.05) x NS NS NS NS NS Rolling Frequency (R) 0x/wk 3x/wk w 7.1 7.6 7.8 7.8 7.6 8.1 6.9 7.1 6.6 6.7 LSD (P = 0.05) * NS * NS NS Monthly Fungicide Application Rate: kg ha -1 (F) Control 0.14 0.14 + 0.14 0.28 0.28 + 0.28 0.56 0.56 + 0.56 5.7 a v 6.5 b 8.5 d 7.3 c 8.3 d 8.0 cd 8.6 d 4.7 a 8.2 b 8.3 b 8.3 b 8.2 b 8.3 b 8.6 b 4.6 a 7.2 b 8.6 c 8.3 c 8.6 c 8.6 c 8.9 c 4.1 a 5.0 b 8.4 de 6.4 c 8.6 e 7.9 d 8.6 e 3.8 a 4.6 b 7.7 d 5.8 c 8.8 e 7.1 d 8.9 e LSD (P = 0.05) 0.7 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.6 S x R NS NS NS NS NS S x F NS * NS NS NS R x F NS NS NS NS NS S x R x F * NS * NS NS z Sand applied biweekly, May to September, at a rate of 11.2 m 3 ha-1. y Capac loam soil particle analysis of 50% sand, 24% silt and 26% clay with a 7.8 pH index. x * and NS indicate significant and not significant at the 0.05 level of probability, respectively w Vibratory -rollers (38.6 kg unit -1) on a triplex -mower (590.9 kg) vertical force value of 0.32 kg cm -2. v Within columns, means followed by the same letter not significantly different with FisherÕs least significant difference at P = 0.05. 70 Contrary to our 2013 quality results, the 14 kg ha -1 month -1 rate did not improve turfgrass quality in 2014, and quality decreased as these boscalid applications accumulated over the season. Nevertheless, the double -quarter rate application treatment (14 + 14 kg ha -1 month -1) was just as efficacious as the full, label recommended application rate of 0.56 kg ha -1 month -1. This suggests that conservative (less than the label recommendation) fungicide rates applied over the course of a growing season will improve fairway turfgrass quality even when environmental conditions are favorable for dollar spot disease outbreak (Table 19). A significant sand topdressing x rolling frequency x fungicide application rate interaction occurred on July 28 with variable and inconsistent mean values; however, the efficacy of lightweight rolling to improve turf quality and suppress disease in turfgrass is brought to light once again. The effect of rolling greatly influenced control plot quality respons e as a function of the sand topdressing treatment (Figure 7). The significant sand topdressing x fungicide application rate interaction demonstrated that the sand topdressing treatment had no influence on fungicide efficacy (Figure 8). However, on August 1 1, a significant sand topdressing x rolling frequency x fungicide application rate interaction demonstrated that the effect of rolling not only influenced control plot quality response, but also the conservative fungicide application rate (14 kg ha -1 month -1) as a function of the sand topdressing treatment (Figure 9). 71 Table 19. Seasonal climatic conditions experienced at the Hancock Turfgrass Research Center. East Lansing, MI 2014. Date Air Temperature (C¡) Precipitation Relative Humidity (%) Max . Min. cm Max. Min. 15 Aug 23.2 6.7 --- 89.1 34.0 16 Aug 26.1 9.9 0.25 89.0 52.0 17 Aug 25.1 17.7 4.06 93.3 62.0 18 Aug 25.9 15.0 --- 90.0 53.2 19 Aug 26.2 16.6 18.54 93.3 58.5 20 Aug 26.1 16.5 0.25 94.5 55.8 21 Aug 26.3 15.2 0.51 94.5 61.9 22 Aug 27.0 20.4 --- 98.9 68.7 23 Aug 27.4 18.1 --- 91.5 51.6 24 Aug 26.6 17.4 --- 93.9 58.5 25 Aug 30.3 17.8 --- 94.5 59.0 Latitude: 42.7110 deg. Longitude: -84.4760 deg. Elevation: 256.64 m Data provided by the Michigan Automated Weather Network (MAWN) and Enviro -weather Program, Michigan State University. 72 ef g cdef ef ab ab cdef cde abc abc abc abc ab ab 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Native Soil Sand Topdress Turfgrass Quality (1-9) 0x Weekly Rolling control 0.14 0.14 + 0.14 0.28 0.28 + 0.28 0.56 0.56 + 0.56 g def ef bcde ab ab ab abcd ab a ab abcd a ab 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Native Soil Sand Topdress Turfgrass Quality (1-9) z 3x Weekly Rolling y control 0.14 0.14 + 0.14 0.28 0.28 + 0.28 0.56 0.56 + 0.56 Figure 7. Effects of sand topdressing x rolling frequency x fungicide application rate on turfgrass quality, July 28, 2014. East Lansing, MI. z Visually assessed based on a 1 (poor or dead) to 9 (best) rating scale with 6 being acceptable. y Vibratory-rollers (38.6 kg unit -1) on a triplex-mower (590.9 kg); vertical force value of 0.32 kg cm -2. Total monthly boscalid fungicide application rates. in kg -1 ha-1. Sand applied biweekly, May to September, at a rate of 11.2 m 3 ha-1. Capac loam soil particle analysis of 50% sand, 24% silt and 26% clay with a 7.8 pH index. Columns with the same letter not significantly different; Tukey-Kramer Grouping at P = 0.05 !" 73 c d ab ab ab ab ab ab b ab ab ab a ab 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Native Soil Sand Topdress Turfgrass Quality (1-9) z Soil Treatment y control 0.14 0.14 + 0.14 0.28 0.28 + 0.28 0.56 0.56 + 0.56 Figure 8. Effects of sand topdressing x fungicide application rate on turfgrass quality, August 4, 2014. East Lansing, MI. z Visually assessed on a 1 (poor or dead) to 9 (best) rating scale with 6 being acceptable. y Vibratory-rollers (38.6 kg unit -1) on a triplex-mower (590.9 kg); vertical force value of 0.32 kg cm -2. Total monthly boscalid fungicide application rates in kg -1 ha-1. Sand applied biweekly, May to September, at a rate of 11.2 m 3 ha-1. Capac loam soil particle analysis of 50% sand, 24% silt and 26% clay with a 7.8 pH index. Columns with the same letter not significantly different; Tukey-Kramer Grouping at P = 0.05 !"" 74 e f cd cd ab ab a ab ab ab ab a a a 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Native Soil Sand Topdress Turfgrass Quality (1-9) 0x Weekly Rolling control 0.14 0.14 + 0.14 0.28 0.28 + 0.28 0.56 0.56 + 0.56 ef d bc ab a a ab ab a a a a 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Native Soil Sand Topdress Turfgrass Quality (1-9) z 3x Weekly Rolling y control 0.14 0.14 + 0.14 0.28 0.28 + 0.28 0.56 0.56 + 0.56 Figure 9. Effects of sand topdressing x rolling frequency x fungicide application rate on turfgrass quality, August 11, 2014. East Lansing, MI. z Visually assessed based on a 1 (poor or dead) to 9 (best) rating scale with 6 being acceptable. y Vibratory-rollers (38.6 kg unit -1) on a triplex-mower (590.9 kg); vertical force value of 0.32 kg cm -2. Total monthly boscalid fungicide application rates in kg -1 ha-1. Sand applied biweekly, May to September, at a rate of 11.2 m 3 ha-1. Capac loam soil particle analysis of 50% sand, 24% silt and 26% clay with a 7.8 pH index. Columns with the same letter not significantly different; Tukey-Kramer Grouping at P = 0.05 !" a a 75 CONCLUSIONS In both years of the study, all boscalid fungicide application rate treatments effectively suppressed dollar spot disease when compared to the control only on two dates. Moreover, when scrutinizing disease severity, sand topdressing and rolling frequency treatments applied alone or in combination did not have synergistic effect on fungicide efficacy. This observation could be attributed to the overall effectiven ess of boscalid fungicide to suppress dollar spot disease in turfgrass because the percentage plot surface area affected by dollar spot disease never exceeded 11% among all application rate treatment levels for the duration of the study. Therefore, any obs ervable interactive treatment effects on dollar spot response were inconsequential and statistically insignificant. Contrary to these findings, Delvalle et al. (2011) observed that daily (7 days week -1) dew removal by lightweight rolling increased the numb er of days needed to reach a disease threshold value when compared to fungicide treatments (chlorothalonil, 8.2 kg a.i. ha -1; propiconazole, 0.7 kg a.i. ha -1; and iprodione, 2.1 kg a.i. ha -1) in which dew was not removed. In our study, the rolling treatmen t was only administered 3x weekly, and perhaps, the frequency was too little to reach similar results. Nevertheless, when evaluating the effects of combinations of sand topdressing, rolling frequency, and fungicide application rates on quantitative as sessments of turfgrass health, we can draw some conclusions in regard to the synergistic effects of these treatments on fungicide efficacy. Because chlorophyll content is a good indicator of plant health (Schuerger et al., 2003; Kruse et al., 2006; Baghzou z et al., 2007), we used a normalized difference vegetation index meter (NDVI -TCM 500, Spectrum Technologies, Inc. Aurora, IL) to quantitatively evaluate turfgrass quality response. With that being said, substantial increases in NDVI response were observed among all fungicide application rates when compared to the control, and surprisingly, no differences were noticed between the lowest monthly application rate (14 kg ha -1) and the full, label recommended application 76 rate (0.56 kg ha -1) on NDVI in 2013. The se results suggest that conservative applications rates, with definite economic benefits, applied over the course of a growing season will improve fairway turfgrass health even when environmental conditions favor dollar spot disease outbreak. We only obse rved one collection date in 2013 where rolling effect was significant, but the 3x weekly rolling treatment yielded the lowest NDVI response compared to the no roll, control. However, in 2014, the 3x weekly rolling treatment yielded the greatest NDVI respon se compared to the no roll, control. Results are consistent with Nikolai et al. (2001) and Giordano et al. (2012) on the long -term benefits of lightweight rolling. Sand topdressing and rolling treatments applied to a fairway turf stand produced inconseque ntial effects on fungicide efficacy and NDVI responses, with the exception of the control plot. Consequently, the effect of rolling greatly influenced control plot NDVI response as a function of the sand topdressing treatment. Similar to these findings, Sk orulski et al. (2010) and Inguagiato et al. (2012) noticed that sand topdressing not only reduced the severity of pathogen infection, but also increased fairway turfgrass quality, color, and density. Moreover, the benefits of lightweight rolling can no lon ger be denied in due respect of the research of Nikolai et al. (2001), Inguagiato et al. (2009), and Giordano et al. (2012) as they have determined that rolling not only decreased dollar spot severity, but also other turf diseases such as anthracnose ( Coll etotrichum cereale Manns sensu lato Crouch, Clarke, and Hillman, 2006). In most instances, visual assessments of turfgrass quality were positively correlated with NDVI responses. Normalized difference vegetation index has been used extensively to referenc e turfgrass stress (Trenholm et al., 1999), and Òto assess a plethora of growth responses, including plant water stressÓ (Baghzouz et al., 2007). Therefore, we felt that NDVI provided a more accurate assessment of turfgrass quality than visual quality asse ssments. The 3x weekly rolling treatment improved turfgrass quality when compared to the no roll, control on several collection dates in 2013 and 2014. Once again in agreement with the findings of 77 Nikolai et al. (2001), Inguagiato et al. (2009), and Giorda no et al. (2012) as they also observed improved turfgrass quality on plots that were rolled over time. On the other hand, the effects of cumulative rolling applications suggest that rolling can be used to increase fungicide efficacy in comparison to the co ntrol. Similar to these findings, Delvalle et al. (2012) observed reduced disease incidence and improved turfgrass quality as a result of daily (7 days week -1) dew removal, and hence an increase in the number of days needed to reach a disease threshold val ue when compared to fungicide treatments (chlorothalonil, 8.2 kg a.i. ha -1; propiconazole, 0.7 kg a.i. ha -1; and iprodione, 2.1 kg a.i. ha -1) in which dew was not removed by a lightweight rolling regime. Additionally, the effects of combinations of cumulat ive sand topdressing and rolling applications suggest that topdressing and rolling can be used to improve turfgrass quality in comparison to the control. Roberts and Murphy (2014) observed that sand topdressing applications reduced anthracnose ( Colletotric hum cereale Manns sensu lato Crouch, Clarke, and Hillman, 2006) in annual bluegrass putting green plots. They also noticed that the effects of combinations of sand topdressing and foot traffic reduced disease incidence and improved turf quality despite gre ater soil bulk density indices. Similar to the aforementioned research findings, Giordano et al. (2012) also noticed fewer dollar spot lesions in sand topdressed turfgrass plots that were rolled 5x weekly, and thus associated this effect as a function of a n increase of volumetric water content since drought stress has been observed to increase disease susceptibility in turf. 78 REFERENCES 79 REFERENCES Baghzouz, M., D.A. Devitt, and R.L. Morris. 2007. Assessing canopy spectral reflectance of hybrid bermudagrass under various combinations of nitrogen and water treatments. App. Eng. Agric. 23: 763 -774. Baldwin, N.A. and A.J. Newell. 1992. Field production of fertile apothecia by Sclerotinia homoeocarpa in Festuca turf. J. Sports Turf Res. Inst. 68: 73 -76. Crouch, J.A., B.B. Clarke, and B.I. Hillman. 2006. Unraveling evolutionary relationships among the divergent lineages of Colletotrichum causing anthracnose disease in turfgrass and corn. Phytopathology. 96: 46 -60. Davies, P. E. and R.W.G. White. 1985. The toxicology and metabolism of chlorothalonil in fish. I. Lethal levels for Salmo gairdneri , Galaxias maculatus , G. truttaceus and G. auratus and the fate of 14C -TCIN in S. gairdneri . Aquatic Toxi. 7(1 -2): 93 -105. Datnoff, L. , M. Brecht, C. Stiles, and B. Rutherford. 2005. The role of silicon in suppressing foliar diseases in warm -season turf. Int. Turfgrass Soc. Res. J. 10(1): 175 -179. Delvalle, T.C., P.J. Landschoot, and J.E. Kaminski. 2011. Effects of dew removal and mowin g frequency on fungicide performance for dollar spot control. Plant Dis . November. 95(11): 1427-1432. Detweiler, A.R., J.M. Vargas, Jr., and T.K. Danneberger. 1983. Resistance of Sclerotinia homoeocarpa to iprodione and benomyl. Plant Dis. June. 67: 627 -630. Dykema, N.M. 2014. Impact of irrigation regime and host cultivar on dollar spot of creeping bentgrass. M.S. diss. Michigan State University. East Lansing, MI. Giordano, P.R., T.A. Nikolai, J.M. Vargas, Jr., and R. Hammerschmidt. 2012. Timing and freq uency effects of lightweight rolling on dollar spot disease in creeping bentgrass putting greens. Crop Sci. June 52:1371 -1378. Giordano, P.R., C. Johnson, J.S. Richards, M.D. Richardson, D.E. Karcher, J.M. Vargas Jr., and T.A. Nikolai. 2013. Investigatin g lightweight rolling thresholds for putting green quality and performance. Int. Turfgrass Soc. Res. J . 12: 157 -162. Godwin, J.R., D.W. Bartlett, J.M. Clough, A.A. Hall, M. Hamer, B. Parr -Dobrzanski. 2002. Review: the strobilurin fungicides. Pest Manageme nt Science . July. 58(7): 649 -662. 80 Golembiewski, R.C., J.M. Vargas, Jr., A.L. Jones, and A.R. Detweiler. 1995. Detection of demethylation inhibitor (DMI) resistance in Sclerotinia homoeocarpa populations. Plant Dis. 79: 491 -493. Goodman, D.M. and L.L. B urpee. 1991. Biological control of dollar spot disease of creeping bentgrass. Phytopathology. 81: 1438 -1446. Inguagiato, J.C., J.A. Murphy, and B.B. Clarke. 2009. Anthracnose disease and annual bluegrass putting green performance affected by mowing and li ghtweight rolling. Crop Sci . July/August. 49(4): 1454 -1462. Inguagiato, J.C., J.A. Murphy, and B.B. Clarke. 2012. Sand topdressing rate and interval effects on anthracnose severity of an annual bluegrass putting green. Crop Sci . May/June. 52(3): 1406 -1415. Jackson, N. 1973. Apothecial production in Sclerotinia homoeocarpa F.T. Bennett. J. of Sports Turf Res. Inst. 49: 58 -63. King, K.W. and J.C. Balogh. 2013. Event based analysis of chlorothalonil concentrations following application to managed turf. Envi r. Toxi. and Chem. 32(3): 684 -691. Kruse, J., N. Christians, and M. Chapin. 2006. Remote sensing of nitrogen stress in creeping bentgrass. Agronomy Journal. 98: 1640 -1645. McDonald, S.J., P.H. Dernoeden, and C.A. Bigelow. 2006. Dollar spot and grey leaf spot severity as influenced by irrigation, chlorothalonil, paclobutrazol, and a wetting agent. Crop Sci. 46: 2675-2684. Powell, J. and J.M. Vargas, Jr. 2001. Vegetative compatibility and seasonal variation among isolates of Sclerotinia homoeocarpa . Plant Dis. 85: 377 -381. Roberts, J. A. and J. A. Murphy. 2014. Anthracnose disease on annual bluegrass as affected by foot traffic and sand topdressing. Plant Dis. 98:1321 -1325. Savant, N.K., G.H. Snyder, and L.E. Datnoff. 1997. Silicon management and sustain able rice production. Adv. Agron. 56:151 -199. Schuerger, A.C., G.A. Capeele, J.A. DiBenedetto, C. Mao, C.N. Thai, M.D. Evans, F.T. Richards, T.A. Blank, and E.C. Styrjewski. 2003. Comparison of two hyperspectral imaging and two laser -induced fluorescence instruments for the detection of zinc stress and chlorophyll concentration in bahiagrass ( Paspalum notatum Flugge). Remote Sens. Environ. 84: 572 -588. Skorulski, J., J. Henderson, and N. Miller. 2010. Topdressing fairways: more is better. USGA green sect ion record . March/April. 48(2): 15 -17. 81 Smiley, R.W., P.H. Dernoeden, and B.B. Clark. 1992. Infectious foliar disease. Compendium of Turfgrass Diseases, 2 nd ed. American Phytopathological Society. St. Paul, Minnesota. Ch. 2:11 -37. Trenholm, L.E., R.N. Carr ow, and R.R. Duncan. 1999. Relationship of multispectral radiometry data to qualitative data in turfgrass research. Crop Sci. 39: 763 -769. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 1999. Reregistration eligibility decision (RED): Chlorothalonil. EPA 738/R -99/004. Washington DC. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 2011. National Marine Fisheries Service biological opinion: registration of pesticides 2, 4 -D, triclopyr BEE, diuron, linuron, captan, and chlorothalonil. Endangered Species Act. Section 7: Consult ation. June. 3:57 -63. Vargas, J.M., Jr. 2005. Fungal diseases of turfgrass, I: diseases primarily occurring on golf course turfs. p. 19 -22. In Management of Turfgrass Diseases. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Hoboken, NJ. Vincelli, P. 2002. Q oI (strobilurin) fun gicides: benefits and risks. The Plant Health Instructor . DOI: 10.1094/PHI -I-2002-0809-02. Warren, C.G., P. Sanders, and H. Cole. 1974. Sclerotinia homoeocarpa resistance to benzimidazole configuration fungicides. Phytopathology. 64: 1139 -1142. Westfall, P.H., R.D. Tobias, D. Rom, R.D. Wolfinger, and Y. Hochberg. 1999. Multiple Comparisons and Multiple Tests Using the SAS System. SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC.