UPTAKE OF 32P BY TRITICUM AESTWUM 32 AND GENETIC CONTROL OF P TRANSFER TO ERYSIIPHE GRAMINIS DURING PRIMARY INFECTION Dissertation for the Degree of Ph. D. MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY TERRY JOE MARTIN 1974 ”a This is to certify that the thesis entitled 32. ’______ [/Pfflhlz- C”: P b7] //‘,'/16um fl€5¥xlzum am! gene/fa Mn/m/ 0/3”? %mns;Qr~ +0 (Ch/fl/JAe-érdrhm}: dart/:7 Primary [/I‘pcfzj’rznpresent by 7-: we fl/ar%u;z_ has been accepted towards fulfillment of the requirements for [7/1, ' E: #4 a 2761 ”/61 f7 7‘ 2 degree in ’1 Y fi/fié; y W Major professor I Date //« /5'3- 74 0-7639 ABSTRACT UPTAKE OF 32P BY TRITICUM AESTIVUM AND GENETIC CONTROL OF 32P TRANSFER TO ERYSIPHE GRAMINIS DURING PRIMARY INFECTION By Terry Joe Martin Environmental conditions necessary for synchronous development of Erysiphe graminis f. sp. tritici Em. Marchal during primary infec- tion of wheat were shown to affect the amount of 32P taken up and translocated to the epidermis of excised leaves placed in a 32P solu- tion. Light increased transpiration, which in turn increased the amount of 32F taken up by the leaves and the amount of 32P transferred to the parasite. Rates of 32P transfer from host to parasite were determined for compatible and incompatible parasite-host interactions during primary infection. Transfer rate reflected the relative compatibility of the host-parasite interaction studied. Interactions with little fungal development had lower rates of transfer, while fully compatible interactions had high rates of transfer. Terry Joe Martin The four possible parasite/host genotypes (the quadratic check) for each interacting gene pair were evaluated for their effects on final infection type seven days after inoculation, on 32F transfer from host to parasite, and on elongating secondary hyphae. With all gene pairs the final infection type of the three compatible interac- tions were similar. Only the incompatible interaction (Eg/Emg) re- sulted in a low infection type. The compatible interactions involving El_and Eml, Eg_and 3mg, E§b_and Em§b_had similar rates of_32P transfer, but this was not true for the compatible interactions involving £&_and Egg, The pfi/fimfi_genotype had a reduced rate of transfer when compared to pfl/pmfi_and Efl/pmfl, The production of elongating secondary hyphae was also delayed with pfl/Emfi, Two other isolates containing p§_re- sulted in a reduction in the percent of parasites that produced elon- gating secondary hyphae. Thus the mutations from Efl_to pfl_in the para- site did not completely negate the change in the host from pmfi_to 393, This indicates that specificity of gene-for-gene interactions is for incompatibility, not compatibility. It also demonstrated how the gene-for-gene hypothesis might play a role in general or horizontal resistance. Germinating conidia of g, graminis were shown to reduce tran- spiration rates of the host before penetration occurred. This was a result of stomate closure induced by the germinating conidia. 2 Terry Joe Martin Extracts of germinating conidia did not reduce transpiration rates and abscisic acid was not detected in the conidia. The reduction in tran- spiration continued through primary infection and was shown to be re- sponsible for less 32F uptake by inoculated plants than noninoculated plants during primary infection. There were no indications for the presence of metabolic sinks induced by g, graminis, which concentrated 32P at infection sites in the epidermis of inoculated plants during primary infection. Accumu- lation of 32F in the epidermis was apparently due to increased cuti- cular transpiration caused by disruption of the cuticle by the devel- oping fungus. UPTAKE OF 32R BY TRITICUM AESTIVUM AND GENETIC 2 CONTROL OF 3 P TRANSFER TO ERYSIPHE GRAMINIS DURING PRIMARY INFECTION By Terry Joe Martin A DISSERTATION Submitted to Michigan State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Department of Botany and Plant Pathology 1974 DEDICATED to Lorna, my wife ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I am deeply in debt to Dr. A. H. Ellingboe for his guidance and assistance during my stay at M.S.U. and in the preparation of this thesis. I am sincerely grateful to Dr. Gene Safir for his advice, assistance, and loan of equipment which enabled a large portion of this research to be done. I am also grateful to the members of my guidance committee. Thanks is also given to Joe Clayton for his active support and advice given to my research program. The help and advice received from my fellow graduate students were extremely valuable throughout my research program, and I thank them for it. I also want to recognize the moral and financial support given to me by my mother and father. If not for their love and support this thesis would never have existed. Financial assistance for this investigation was obtained from the National Institute of Health and the National Science Foundation for which I am grateful. TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES ..... . . . . ......... . ....... LIST OF FIGURES ......................... INTRODUCTION. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . LITERATURE REVIEw ........................ MATERIALS AND METHODS ...................... Production of Inoculum .................... Methods of Inoculation .................... Environmental Conditions for Experiments ........... Designation of Genotypes ................... Examination of Fungal Structures ............... Detection of 32 P in Leaf Sections, Epidermis, and Parasite. . uptake of 32F ........................ 32F Transfer from Host to Parasite .............. Quadratic Checks ....................... Effects of Inoculation on 32F Uptake by Detached Leaves . . . Effects of Inoculation on Transpiration ........... Relative Diffusion Resistance ................ iv Page vi vii l8 I8 20 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 TABLE OF CONTENTS (cont.) Page Extraction of Germinated Conidia. .............. 29 Effects of E, graminis on Uptake and Translocation of 32? During Primary Infection of Wheat ........... 3i Transpiration Rates of Intact Inoculated and Noninoculated Plants During Primary Infection .............. 3l Replication and Statistics .................. 32 RESULTS .................. . .......... 33 Replication of Previous Work ................. 33 32F Uptake and Translocation to the Epidermis ........ 33 Transfer of 32F to the Parasite ............. . . 4l Quadratic Checks ....................... 52 Effects of Inoculation on 32F Uptake by Detached Leaves . . . 75 Transpiration Rates of Detached Leaves ............ 78 Relative Diffusion Resistance ................ 78 Interaction Specificity .............. . . . . . 79 Extracts of Germinated Conidia ................ 80 Effects of E, graminis on Uptake and Translocation of 32F During Primary Infection ................ 80 Transpiration Rates of Inoculated and Noninoculated Near-Isogenic Lines of Wheat During Primary Infection . . . 84 DISCUSSION. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ............ 96 SUMMARY ............................. l09 LITERATURE CITED ......................... 112 V Table LIST OF TABLES Page Infection type produced seven days after inoculation of five near-isogenic wheat lines with six cultures of g, graminis f. sp. tritici.. ............... l9 The amount of 32F taken up by one cm leaf sections as determined by three methods of preparing the sample . . . 36 Transpiration rates of intact noninoculated and inoculated near-isogenic wheat seedlings three and six hours after inoculation with Erysiphe graminis f. sp. tritici (MS-l). 79 The average transpiration rate (mg cm'2 hr") of near- isogenic wheat lines, the percent decrease, and the P value for the difference between inoculated and non- inoculated plants 20-30 hours after inoculation with E, graminis f. sp. tritici ................ 95 vi Figure 1. LIST OF FIGURES The four possible parasite/host genotypes involving a single gene pair governing compatibility of host and parasite. Rx_and rx_are alternate alleles in the host. Ex_and px_are alternate alleles of the para- site. Ex/Rx_specifies incompatibility while 25/35, 95/35, and px/rx_specify compatibility ......... The pattern of interaction with a multiple allelic series in the host ........................ The two types of gene products following crossing over between two closely linked genes or within one cistron . Development of Erysiphe graminis f. Sp. tritici during primary infection of wheat leaves ............ The effect of light on 32F uptake in inoculated wheat leaves one through l0 hours after being placed in 32F solution (32F CPM X lO‘5 cm‘] leaf section) ....... The effect of the environmental conditions used for synchronous parasite development during primary infection on 32F uptake during five hour uptake periods by wheat leaves and translocation to the epidermis in wheat leaves inoculated with Erysiphe graminis f. sp. tritici ................. Rates of 32F transfer from five near-isogenic wheat lines to Er Si he raminis f. sp. tritici culture MS-l (Ex) ( P CPM X 10' /5,000 spores applied) ..... Rates of 32F transfer from near-isogenic wheat lines of the Em§_allelic series to Erysiphe graminis f. sp. tritici culture MS-l (Ex) (34F CPM X lO'3/5,OOO spores applied) ........................ vii Page 12 T4 34 37 39 42 45 LIST OF FIGURES (cont.) Figure 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. Rates of 32? transfer from five near-isogenic wheat lines to‘Erysiphe graminis f. sp. tritici culture MS-l (Ex) (32p CPM x 10-3/5,ooo spores applied/4,500 32p CPM in the epidermis) ..................... Effect of light given from 20 to 30 hours after inocula- tion on 32F transfer from Chancellor wheat (pmx) allowed to take up 32F for five hours to Erysiphe graminis f. sp. tritici culture MS-l (E29 .............. Rates of 32F transfer from four near-isogenic wheat lines to Erysiphe graminis f. sp. tritici culture MS-l (Ex) s32? CPM x 10-37s,ooo functional parasite units/4,500 2P CPM in the epidermis) ................ Rates of 32F transfer from wheat to Erysiphe graminis f. sp. tritici with the four possible parasite/host geno- types involving El_and Eml_(32P CPM X 10'3/5.OOO spores applied) ........................ Rates of 32? transfer from wheat to Erysiphe graminis f. sp. tritici with the four possible parasite/host geno- types involving Eg_and Emg_(32P CPM X 10'3/5,OOO spores applied) ........................ Rates of 32F transfer from wheat to Erysiphe graminis f. sp. tritici with the four possible parasite/host geno- types involving g§_and gm§g_(32p CPM x 10-3/5,OOO spores applied) ........................ Rates of 32F transfer from wheat to_Erysiphe graminis f. sp. tritici culture MS-l (£5) and MS-Z (95) with the four possible parasite/host genotypes involving Eg_and gmg_( 2? CPM x 10-3/s.ooo spores applied) ........ Formation of elongating secondary hyphae (ESH) by Erysiphe graminis f. sp. tritici cultures MS-l (35) and MS-Z (£5) with the four possible parasite/host genotypes involving Pg_and Emg_ ............. viii Page 47 50 53 55 58 60 62 64 LIST OF FIGURES (cont.) Figure 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. Page Formation of elongating secondary hyphae (ESH) by Erysiphe graminis f. sp. tritici culture MS-Z (93) on four near-isogenic wheat lines three of which contained a dominant Em_gene .............. 67 Formation of elongating secondary hyphae (ESH) by Erysiphe graminis f. sp. tritici cultures MS-l (£2) and MS-Z (£2) with the four possible parasite/host genotypes involving 3mg. ................. 69 Formation of elongating secondary hyphae (ESH) by Erysiphe graminis f. sp. tritici cultures MS-l (£3) and KhXCc7 (95) with the four possible parasite/host genotypes involving Efl_and Emg_ ....... . . . . . . 7l Formation of elongating secondary hyphae (ESH) by Erysiphe graminis f. sp. tritici cultures MS-l (£3) and MS—3 (23) with the four possible parasite/host genotypes involving Pfi_and Emg_ ............. 73 The uptake of 32F in one cm leaf sections of wheat seedlings one to six hours after inoculation and the percent germination of conidia of Erysiphe graminis f. sp. tritici exposed to various doses of ultraviolet irradiation ....................... 76 Uptake and translocation of 32F to the epidermis of wheat given 32F for five hours during primary infection. . . . 8l Average transpiration rates of Chancellor (pmx) wheat seedlings at different time periods during primary infection ........................ 85 Average transpiration rate of Eml_wheat seedlings at different time periods during primary infection ..... 87 Average transpiration rate of ng_wheat seedlings at different time periods during primary infection ..... 89 Average transpiration rate of Pm3b wheat seedlings at different time periods during primary infection ..... 9l ix LIST OF FIGURES (cont.) Figure Page 27. Average transpiration rate of fimfi_wheat seedlings at different time periods during primary infection ..... 93 INTRODUCTION Many attempts have been made to correlate disease development and physiological or biochemical changes that occur in resistant or susceptible host tissue. Unfortunately most of these correlations have been made during late stages of disease deveIOpment. Compati- bility or incompatibility of an interaction is usually established during early stages of the infection process. The purpose of this study was to examine the interactions between host and parasite during the initial stages of the infection process. Powdery mildew of wheat is caused by the obligate parasite Erysiphe graminis f. sp. tritici Em. Marchal. The disease has re- sulted in significant reductions in grain yields in some areas of the world (24, 53). The most practical means of controlling this disease is the development and use of resistant cultivars. Selection for disease resistance has made available many host cultivars with varying degrees of resistance to powdery mildew. The inheritance of resistance to E, graminis has been studied (6) and near-isogenic wheat lines which differ by only single genes for resistance have been developed (7). A large number of isolates of the fungus that differ in respect to virulence are also available. A well defined system for studying the primary infection process of E, graminis on wheat has been described (27, 32, 36). The process was divided into distinct stages, based on morphological development of the fungus. Each stage required specific environmental conditions for the parasite population to attain a high degree of synchrony. Synchrony of the parasite population allowed correlation of physiological and biochemical changes to morphological development of the parasite. Slesinski (49) measured the rates of 355 transfer from wheat leaves to the hyphae of E, graminis during primary infection. Stuckey (50) demonstrated the effect of the environment on the rates of 353 transfer and also put the data on a quantitative basis by determining the amount of 35 S transferred to each parasite unit. He also took into consideration the amount of 35S theoretically available for transfer. The rates of transfer were correlated with the morphological development of the parasite and were shown to be dependent on para- site/host genotype. The objectives of my research were: I) to examine the uptake and translocation of 32F by the host under the environmental condi- tions used for synchronous parasite development; 2) to determine the rates of 32P transfer from host to parasite by considering the amount of label theoretically available in the epidermis for transfer to the parasite, and to correlate these with the morphological stage of development of the parasite with both compatible and incompatible parasite/host genotypes; 3) to use the criteria of 32P transfer, infection efficiency (production of elongating secondary hyphae), and final infection type to determine if the three compatible parasite/host genotypes (Eszmg, px/me, and EE/pmé) involving a single pair of cor- responding genes in the parasite and host are identical; and 4) to 32 determine why less P is taken up by inoculated excised wheat leaves than by noninoculated excised wheat leaves. LITERATURE REVIEW In the following review I will attempt to summarize the important developments in the physiology and genetics of disease development that bear on the results reported herein. The primary infection process of E, graminis on wheat has been divided into distinct morphological stages: l) germination, 2) production of club-shaped appressorial initials, 3) formation of mature appressoria, 4) penetration of the cuticle and epidermal cells, 5) formation of haustoria, and 6) development of elongating secondary hyphae. Each stage differed in its requirement for temper- ature, relative humidity, and light (28, 36). Under optimal condi- tions over 75% of the parasite population moved through each stage with a high degree of synchrony (28. 32, 36). The production of elongating secondary hyphae (ESH) has been used as the criterion for the establishment of a functional relationship between host and para- site (29). For each elongating secondary hyphae (ESH) that formed on the host surface a haustorium was produced in the epidermal cell (29). Conidia on non-host plants germinated, formed appressoria, and attempted to penetrate epidermal cells, but did not form either haustoria or ESH (27, 54). The presence of the haustorium and ESH indicated the transfer of nutrients and other essential materials from host to parasite, thus the establishment of functional rela- tionships. The percentage of applied conidia that produced ESH was defined as infection efficiency (l4, l5). Flor (18) found that the ability of Melampsora lini to grow and produce symptoms on flax lines containing certain genes was deter- mined by specific corresonding genes in the pathogen. The existence of one gene in the pathogen for each gene in the host led to the development of the gene-for-gene hypothesis (I9, 38). The gene-for- gene hypothesis states that for every (3) gene in the host that con- ditions resistance there is a corresponding (B) gene in the parasite that conditions avirulence. The (E) gene interacts with the (3) gene in the host to determine incompatibility (low infection type). In- compatibility results only when a (E) gene in the parasite interacts with its specific (3) gene in the host (El/El). Compatibility is specified with the other possible parasite/host genotypes 31/51, 91/31, and pl/rl, With two alleles at one locus in a host (R_and 3) and two at a corresponding locus in a parasite (E_or 9), there are four possible interactions (Figure I). This basic scheme was proposed (42) as a biological test to study physiological and biochemical effects of disease development. By the use of different host geno- types in combination with various pathogen genotypes, a four way or Fig. l.-—The four possible parasite/host genotypes involving a single gene pair governing compatibility of host and parasite. Rx and rx are alternate alleles in the host. Px and p__are alter- nate alleles in the parasite. Px/Rx specifies incompatibility while Egg/pg, IDS/fl: and Up; specify compatibility. H. .m— w..._m<~_mm_ pews: mo :owpommcw xemewea mcwezu wowpwep .am .m mwcAEamm mzawwxmm mo “cesao—m>mouu.e .mwm 35 e musmflm 1.: 20.53302. 5:: 22: 3 .3 ea «a as o. m x o 0 V «O lNiDlid 36 TABLE 2.--The amount of 32F taken up by one cmleaf sections (1.0 X 0.5 cm) as determined by three methods of preparing the sample. Radioactivity (CPM) Time after Ino%:l;tion Direct Leaf Aliquot Dried In Aliquot Dried 0n Section Count Scintillation Vial Filter Paper 20 39.292 38.350 53.000 28 -- 131,200 167,600 30 -- 116.176 149.500 aliquot in the bottom of a scintillation vial was no better than placing the whole leaf section in the vials. Samples were dried on filter paper throughout the remaining experiments. The effect of light on 32? uptake by inoculated leaves was determined (Figure 5). There was a very definite effect of light on .32 32 P uptake. After five hours in P the leaves kept in the dark were only 50% as radioactive as plants kept in the light. The rate of 32F uptake during this 10 hour period appeared to be reasonably constant. This was true for plants in the light or the dark. The effects of the environment during primary infection on 32P and translocation to the epidermis were determined uptake of (Figure 6). The environmental conditions necessary for synchronous parasite development are indicated across the top of the figure. 37 .Acoppomm mmmF ”use muop x 2mg a V coppapom c a m m mm . a m w umuep :vmn emuem meson o_ 5 song» use mm>mmp pawn: uwum_:uocv cw wxmpaa mum no a; __ eo powwow mzhuu.m .mrm 38 m musmflm 2.: 32: 0|.llo «TOD . . Em: “'2 c O.— m.— md. ‘91 x we: a“ 39 .Aouuniuuullgv mwscmuTam .AQIIIIIIIAL mcowpomm mam; “wavereg .am .m.mflmflamum mcmvmxem spwz umpmrzuo:w mm>mm~ poms: cw mvELmuram mg» op cowpouormcmcp ucm mm>am_ paws: xa meowema mxmua: Lao; m>wm mcwczc mxmua: awn co cowuumwcw xemsvea mcwcsu pamEQo—m>mu mpvmmemq mzocoesuczm Low umm: mcowpwucou FaucmEcoLF>cm mg» yo pumwmm mghuu.m .mwm 40 o ousmflm at: 20.533002. amhm< 5):... ON «a 2. 3 O— o — o O O ("D O N 2i / x In 0 a o.— a w / \o m.— 0/0 \ summons :10 WDI NI e-Ol x we “as nouoas wan/9-01 x was “as u «WI E zuixmo .2.on bra... 88(0 . _._ 8¢<9 41 Both curves show a major effect of light on 32F uptake or translo- 32 cation. The radioactivity in the epidermis of plants taking up P from 21 to 26 hours after inoculation was eight times greater than 32P from 15 to 20 in the epidermis of those plants that took up hours. Radioactivity in the leaf sections shows a fourfold in- crease at the two different uptake times. The 32P in the epi- dermis would be theoretically available for transfer to the para- site. So there were large differences in the amount available to be transferred to the parasite, depending on the time after inocu- lation when the 32F was taken up. Transfer of 32P to the Parasite The rates of 32? transfer from wheat leaves to E, graminis was determined, using near-isogenic wheat lines (Figure 7). Host lines Pml, Pm2, Pm3b, and Emfl_are incompatible with culture MS-l (P ) while pm5_is compatible with culture MS-l (E5). The radioactivity in parlodion strips from noninoculated plants which had taken up 32P during the same time was subtracted from the amount of 32F in parlodion strips from inoculated plants. This control averaged 53 to 81 CPM. 32F transfer from all wheat lines to the fungus started at 10 hours after inoculation and increased very slowly until 20 hours after inoculation. There were no differences between near-isogenic 42 .Aum__aaa maaoam ooo.m\m.oP x 2&0 ammv eacwaaapaa xpw>wpomowume may vcm mawcpm coquo—ng cw um>osme cmsp we; mzmcze mgp we cowpcoa o_pwmmeaa0pum use .meso; m>wm cow cowu=Fom awn a cw umompa new cowpmfiauocw Levee meson mzovcm> omen as“ we use mew: mucmFQ .ammv Pumz me=p_:o Powpwcu .am .m mwcwsmem mgmwmxcm op mmcw— paws: owcmmomw-emmc m>ve Eoee emwmcmep mum mo mmgmmuu.N .mwm 43 h madman «an: 20....<.=..UOZ_ umhm< On 0N NN . 2 V— .I ImWI “um. //4 (II. ////< ./1 xi _u Oll 05/4. 0 a / \0 \\\\ ./ IJV\\\. alllla o ./ o «III-4 / a H... m2..— 0° 3g" I :4 A ggg o o. "I o O .4 MD ._' °. N ,_OI x was an 44 lines during this period. With the compatible genotype (BEE), the rates increased sharply at 22 and 24 hours, then leveled off or decreased slightly from 26 to 30 hours. The rates of transfer from Eml were significantly less compared to pm5_at 24 hours. Transfer continued to decrease from 22 to 30 hours. The transfer kinetics were the same from Emg_and REE: Rates of transfer from Em§E_were not significantly different from pm§_until 30 hours after inocula- tion. Transfer rates from Emfi_were similar to me_until 28 hours after inoculation, when the rate dropped rapidly. The kinetics of 32F transfer from pm§_and three alleles of the Em; locus were determined (Figure 8). Em§g_and Em§9_had sim- ilar rates of transfer, while Em§g_did not differ from me, Em§g_ and Em§E_were both significantly different from pm§_and Em§g_30 hours after inoculation. The rates of 32P transfer shown in Figure 7 were adjusted for 32P in the epidermis at each hour after inoculation 32 the amount of (Figure 9). The amount of P in the epidermis is theoretically the amount available to be transferred from the epidermis to the parasite 32 (Figure 6). The data were plotted as P CPM/5000 spores/4500 CPM available in the epidermis at the end of the five hour uptake period. 32 Rates of P transfer from the five near-isogenic lines from Six to 45 .Aoappaaa Astana ooo.m\m-o_ x sag aumv asepEESDao spp>ppoa -opooe ocp oco mopepm copopopeoo cp oo>osoc mo: woman» osp mo coppeoo opppmoeooopoo on» .meoo; o>pp com coppopom mum o op oooopo oco coppopooocp Loppo meson maopeo> omen osp po poo oeoz mpcopo .Axov lez oeoppzo.flmflmflum .om .4 mpcpEopm.o;mexum op mopeom oppo—po me; ogp mo mocpp poms: upcomompucooc Eoem eopmcoep mum mo mopomnu.w .mpm 46 on 1.: on m onsmwm 20....<._DUOZ. Mmhm< mi: «N a— : O— 0“ \" ”VXA. . \ yppooopooe ocp coo mopcpm copopopeoo cw oo>oeoe cogp mo; momcom ogp mo coppeoo opppmocooopoo o3» .meoo; o>pm so; coppspom mum o cp oooo—o coo coppopzoocp eopwo mono; moopeo> omen ocp pm poo moo: mpcopo .mmmv —umz oeoppzo popppep .om .m.mmmflamum osmpmxem op mocp— poms: upcomompxpoo: o>pp zoom poomcoep mum po mopomuu.m .mpm 48 on m musmflm :5 2923302. «up: as: on «a o. 1 o— .oilnlo. MWHHMM dulllld — n— “I o O.— m.— c_OI x was an 49 20 hours were not significantly different from each other, thus, these data were averaged together and represented by a single line. With the adjustments made (Figure 9), the same differences between host lines which were shown in Figure 7 are seen again, but the maximum rate of transfer from EEE."°W appears to occur from 20 to 22 hours instead of 24 to 26 hours after inoculation. A steady increase in transfer rate occurred from ten to 22 hours and then a gradual decrease occurred from 22 to 30 hours after inocula- tion. The rates of 32P transfer from pm5_in the light and dark from 20 to 30 hours after inoculation were determined (Figure 10). The data were plotted as CPM/5000 spores applied. No correction 32F in the epidermis was made. Transfer rates for the amount of in the light were similar to those reported in Figure 7. Transfer rates in the dark at 23 and 29 hours were not different from the: rate of 32F transferred at 20 hours. This gives support to the argument that the adjustment of transfer data to take into consider- ation the amount of 32F activity in the epidermis is reasonable. If we assume that only functional parasite units (47), i.e., parasite units with haustoria and ESH, are taking up 32F from the leaf we can further adjust the data in Figure 9 to give the rates of 32P transfer/functional parasite unit/CPM available in the epidermis 50 .Ao.--luilu--ov mono; om op xpm soap xpoo .Ao ov mono; om op om soap psmpp oco mono; om op xpm sop» some .mmmv pumz oesppao.HmHMHum .om .m mpcpsoem mmmmmmnmm op meson o>pm Lop mum on oxop op oozoppo «mamv poms: eoppoocosu soap commcoep mum co coppopooocp Lopmo mason om op om soew co>pm pgmpp mo poompmuu.op .mpm 51 op ousopm at: ZO:<._DU..OZ_ umhm< mirp. on 8 «a 2 o. o .'. . II I, ‘I.’ ’50-.“ . ell-o £500 ollo Eu: 0 m --' o c_OI x was an '0. — o N 52 (Figure 11). Infection efficiencies on pmx, Pml, Pm3b, and 394 were 80, 17, 30, and 4%, respectively. The adjustments indicated the rates of 32 P transfer/successful primary infection were higher with incom- patible genotypes than rates with compatible genotypes. At 30 hours after inoculation the rates of 32P transfer/successful primary infection with the incompatible interactions with Eml_and Em§E_were the same as the rate for the compatible interaction with 2mg, Transfer rates from Emfl were not the same as from pm5_at 30 hours, but the rate was decreasing rapidly. The adjustment was not applied to transfer rates from Emg_because it gave results similar to transfer from REE: Quadratic Checks The rates of 32F transfer from wheat to E, graminis with the four possible parasite/host genotypes involving El_and Eml_were deter- mined (Figure 12). The incompatible interaction El/Eml, which gives 32P transfer as shown pre- a low infection type, had a low rate of viously (Figure 7). The three compatible interactions, which all gave the same high infection type, had similar rates of 32F transfer. The final infection type of the four possible interactions involving EE_and Egg followed the usual pattern for the quadratic check, all four genotypes gave the same rates of transfer during 53 .Ampeeoopoo ozp cp zoo own oom.¢\mppc= oppmoeoo pocoppocop ooo.m\m-op x zoo ommv oocpeeopoo app>ppooopooe new mopcpm copopopcoo cp oo>oeoe mo: mousse ogp mo coppeoo opppmoeooopoo och .meso; o>pm pom coppopom mum o op oooopo coo :oppopooocp Loppo meso; moopeo> omen asp po poo moo: mpcopo .mmmv pumz ogoppzo popppep .om .m mpcpEoem ocmpmxcm op mocpp poms: upcomompupooc Loop Eoew eowmcoep own po mopomu-.—_ .mpm 54 pp muoopm 2.: 20.53302. fit? 52: on on «a 2 S 2 o u in. slog old IE“ “Ellie. ”mumau o— V— 55 .Aemppaaa maaoam coo.m\m-o_ x zao amp: caspememu ppp>pp -ooopooe oco mopepm copopoppoo op om>oEme mo: moocop mop po coppeoo opppmoeooopom mop .mgoo; m>pp Lop coppowmm omm.micp omoopo oco coppo—ooocp gmppo meoo; mooppo> moon mgp po poo mum: mpcopm .pso oco pa mcp>po>cp mmoxpocmm pmo;\mppmopoo mpopmmoo poop mop opp: popppep .am .p mpcpeaom mompmpao op peas: soap amomeaap mom po mmpam--.~p .opm 56 hr. 7:. . . glib mp mwoopm ZO..—<._D UOZ. mmhu< mi: p E : on on «N o./ /.’OI I .0 I/ ~\ /o0\ \ ‘0 up 3 0 II... “"3“. ,iuc“ \ "NC 4'4 m\a .II... 25:? o o Wau\—.m :11. Ex:— md O.— m... ON ,_01 x was an 57 primary infection (Figure 13). EE/Emg_has not been shown to affect pri- 32P transfer supported that mary infection efficiency (34). The rates of conclusion. The quadratic check with E§E_and Em§E_also resulted in one geno- type with low infection type and three genotypes with high infection types. Rates of 32P transfer (Figure 14) were similar with the three compatible genotypes while transfer was lower after 26 hours with the incompatible genotype. The final infection types of the four possible genotypes involving Efi_and Egg also followed the expected pattern of the quadratic check, namely, one genotype gave low infection type and three genotypes gave high infection types. The rates of 32F transfer with the incompatible genotype were similar to earlier results (Figure 7). The rates of transfer for the pfl/Emfi_genotype were reduced when compared to Eg/pmg_and pfi/pm4_(Figure 15). The quadratic check using the same cultures was then completed using the criterion of production of elongating secondary hyphae (i.e., infection efficiency). A slower rate of development of elongating secondary hyphae (ESH) with pfl/Emg_than with the other two compatible genotypes was ob- served (Figure 16). The same infection efficiency was obtained but it was delayed approximately two hours compared to the other compatible genotypes. Standard deviations bracket each point (Figure 16). The behavior of MS-2 cannot be due to nonspecific genes for slow growth because normal kinetics of the formation of ESH were observed on the host line with 2mg, 58 .3938 «82: 883?? x 28 amp: 85638 3.2,: -ooopooe oco mopopm copopopeoo cp om>osme mo: momcom mop mo copppoo opppmooooopom mop .meoo; m>pp Lop coppowmm omm.micp omoopo com coppopooocp omppo meoo; moopoo> mmoo mzp pa poo mom: mpcopo .NEo oco No mcp>po>cp mmozpocmm pmo;\mppmogoo mpopmmoo Loom mcp opp: popppep .om .p mpcpEoLm mgawwxom op poms: soc: empmcoep mum po mmpom--.mp .mpm 59 on ma Dawn 1.: 20.53302. our? mi: on «a 2 .1 o— 1.1. 4! Manx” “I O O. “I p c at c...OI x was an 60 .Aoappaaa mmaoaa ooo.m\m-o_ x zao am»: oacpsempau opp>pp -ooopooo oco mopepm copopopeoo op om>osme mo: momcoo mop mo coppooo opppmoeooopom mop .mpoo; m>pp Lop coppopom omm.micp omoo—o oco coppopooocp ompmo moooz moopeoo moon mop po poo mom: mpcopm .omEm oco mo mcp>po>cp mmoapocmm pmos\mppmoooo mpopmmoo Loom mcp opp: popppep .om .p mpcpsopm mgapmzpu op poms: so»: empmcoep mum mo mmpoaul.¢p .opo 61 on vp onampm «=3 ZO_.—<._DUOZ_ umhm< m2..— 8 «a 2 3 o— “I o 0. p “I -u- 0 N ,_01 _x was a“ 62 .Aomppooo mmooom ooo.m\m-op x sou om v omcpEmemo app>ppooopooo oco mopepm copopopooo op om>osmp mo: momcom mcp mo coppeom opppmogooopom ms» .mooo; mop: Lop coppopom own a op omoopo oco coppopooocp mepo mpoo; moopgo> moon mgp po poo mom: mpcopo umam new on mcp>po>cp mmoapocmm pmo;\mppmoeoo mpnpmmoo Loop mop cpp: away mum: one ammv pzmz mooppoo popppep .om .p mpcpEoom mgmpmamm op poms: soap emmmcoep mum mo mmpomux.mp .mpm 63 mp ouampm 1.: 2253302. our? 22: on cu «m .a— I c— // \ In! \ I...’ ~ p . pp / \\ s a p pm poms: mo mpeemopom mcp op mum mo coppooopmcoep oco mxopooii.mm .mpm 82 mm musmpm A2,; zeta—30:. 3:0 9:... Omoflouguuoum— 0— IN—OFQ o o. / \ so /D a . 00 D 0.. I... O o I .l I. I ..... ’ .IIII .“ . IIIIII . IIIIIII . IIIIIII .0 coco 000 I . co 000 \ o 000 o. D \ D \ D l a s I .0 .0. / 0000.. o. I o. .oo o I D oooo I co... coo IIIII I a I o I n. I m 2.9... — u... on —:.u... 8N and cm x was an 33 significantly less than that taken up by noninoculated leaves. At 22, 24, and 26 hours no significant differences existed. At hours 28 and 30 the differences were statistically significant. The 32F translocated to the epidermis of inoculated plants was significantly less than in the epidermis of noninoculated plants at the 5% level six through 20 hours after inoculation. There was no difference at 22 32 hours but at 24 through 30 hours there was more P in the epidermis of inoculated plants than noninoculated plants. The epidermis of 32F from 25 inoculated and noninoculated plants plants which took up to 30 hours in 100% RH in the light contained 1,484 CPM and 3,870 CPM, respectively. Thus, when the transpiration stress was removed, the inoculated epidermis contained 62% less 32P than did the noninoculated epidermis. If the plants were pretreated for two hours in 100% RH before being cut and given 32P from 25 to 30 hours after inoculation the epidermis of the inoculated plants contained 780 CPM and the non- inoculated epidermis contained 1,616 CPM, 51% less 32P in inoculated epidermis. This is approximately the amount of 32P that is taken up in the dark (Figure 22). 84 Transpiration Rates of Inoculated and Noninoculated Near-isogenic Lines of Wheat During Primary Infection The average rates of transpiration during primary infection of inoculated and noninoculated near-isogenic wheat lines were measured (Figures 23—27). All lines have curves shaped similar to those seen in Figure 22. Transpiration rates of inoculated plants were lower through 20 hours. However, after 20 hours, the difference between inoculated and noninoculated plants was not similar for all lines. Table 4 gives the average transpiration rates of inoculated and non- inoculated wheat lines from 22 to 30 hours after inoculation. It also gives the percent differences between inoculated and noninocu- lated lines and the P value for those differences. A P value of < .25 was shown for the difference between inoculated and noninoculated Chancellor, while Em), Emg, and Em§E_inoculated and noninoculated plants had P values of < .05 for their differences. There was no difference between inoculated and noninoculated Emfl, ‘3'v.~ ' 4...‘\;. 85 .coppompcp zooepoo mcpcoo moopemo mepp pcmompmpo pm mmcppommm poms: awamv eoppmocooo oo mmpoe coppoepomcoop mmoom> .75 DISCUSSION The original goal Of this research was to study the genetic control of 32P transfer from host to parasite. It was hoped that this would give us a more sensitive measure of compatibility or incompati- bility between host and parasite. It would also lay the basis for a more detailed biochemical study on how compatibility or incompatibility affects the different metabolic pathways involving phosphorus in both host and parasite during primary infection. In preliminary experiments, the environmental conditions necessary for synchronous development of E, graminis f. sp. tritici were shown to be quite influential on the uptake of 32F during primary infection (Figure 6). It appears that light is the major factor. The rate of 32P uptake by plants in the dark is only about 50% of the rate of uptake by plants in the light (Figure 5). Earlier work (32) indi- cated that leaves given 32P for four hours were saturated and addi- tional uptake time would not greatly increase the amount of 32F in the leaf. It was argued that if the leaf was already saturated with 32F, the environment should not affect the amount of 32F in the leaf. The data presented here (Figure 5) conclusively Shows that light does 96 97 32 affect P uptake and saturation does not occur for at least ten hours. Earlier experiments were done with 100 uCi 32P/mt solutions, but the 50 uCi/ml increase over what was used in this study should have been negligible because the 32F was in a 0.1 M phosphate buffer in both studies. The differences between earlier studies and the data pre- sented herein may be due to procedures used in this study which mini- mize the possibility of getting air into the vascular system when leaves were cut at the base and placed in solutions containing 32P. 35 32 If S and P were both transferred from host to parasite by simple diffusion one would expect similar rates of transfer of each isotope. However there are some important differences between the 32 35 data reported in this thesis for transfer of P and the data on S transfer for a compatible parasite/host interaction (50). The earliest 32P was detected in the parasite was ten hours after inoculation, which corresponds to the time haustoria can first be seen in the host cells 35 (32). S was first detected in the parasite at 16 hours, which is the time that.haustoria begin to develop appendages (Personal communication from Mary Joy Haywood). This may indicate that 32F simply diffuses into the parasite as soon as the parasite penetrates the host cell wall, while 35S may require a more complex transport system. The possibility exists that the transport systems for 32P are merely func- 35 32 35 S. P and S transfer were very tioning earlier than those for 98 similar from 18 hours onward. However the amount of 32F transferred 35 was much higher than the amount of S transferred. This could be a function of the ability of 32 355. P to move through the leaf faster than When corrections are applied for the amount of 32F available to be transferred we find that the highest rate of transfer occurs from 20 to 22 hours after inoculation. Similar results were obtained 35 32P and 35 for S transfer (50). The rates of 5 transfer dropped off after 22 hours. The validity of correcting transfer rates for the amount of 32P available is supported by the fact that, when the lights were left off from 20 to 30 hours, the same amount of 32P was available for transfer after 20 hours as before, the rates of transfer in the dark did not increase after 20 hours after inoculation. The dark period from 20 to 30 hours does slow down development of ESH but only for two hours (50). Thus slower rates of ESH development would not explain the decreased transfer in the dark. 32 The amount of P transferred from host to parasite was found to correspond to morphological development of the fungus with the various genotypes. The reduction of the percentage of ESH for the incompatible interactions (47), E1/Em1, EE/sz, P3b/Pm3b, and Efi/Emg, was similar to the reduction in 32F transfer, however, the decreases 32 in P transfer were later than those observed for 355 transfer. 99 Decreases in 32P transfer were not seen until.after morphological 355 transfer was affected concurrent with or differences were noted. prior to effects of the different incompatible genotypes on morpho- logical development of the fungus (50). Results from the comparison of 32F transfer from host lines with the allelic series of genes at the Em§_locus failed to differen- tiate between Pm3a and Pm3b. If these genes are truely allelic, then i one would expect them to affect parasite development in the same way. “LC . h' :1”: Pm3c had similar kinetics of transfer as 9mg, This was expected since Pm3c does not have an apparent effect in the primary leaf (5, 6, 41). If only functional parasite units transfer 32P, then the amount” of 32 P transferred by the functional units in incompatible interactions is greater than the rates per parasite unit in compatible interactions. With the exception of 394, the rates of 32P transfer in incompatible interactions eventually decreased to the same level as in the compat- ible interactions. Rates of 32 P transfer from plants with Emg_were higher at 30 hours, but they were decreasing and it is predicted that the rates may eventually reach the same as in the compatible inter- actions. An alternate explanation is of course possible. The non- functional parasite units could be taking up 32P until 30 hours after inoculation, at which time the process is halted. It is also possible, especially with Eg_and Egg, that after collapse of the parasite, which lOO occurs approximately 22 hours after inoculation, that there was dif- 32P into the collapsed parasite. By 30 hours after fusive flow of inoculation this "dead" parasite may be such that 32F did not diffuse into it or the necrotic host cell which the parasite had attempted to penetrate. The four possible parasite/host genotypes (the quadratic check) ' .. In". ...(Idunllll. for each pair of interacting genes were evaluated for their effect on rates of 32P transfer from host to parasite during primary infection. The incompatible parasite/host genotype El/Eml_gave low rates Of 32P transfer. The three compatible genotypes Eljpml, pl/Eml, and pl/pml, all gave similar, high rates of transfer. The incompatible genotype EEE/Em§2_gave low rates of transfer while the three compatible geno- types P3b/pm3b, pSD/Pm3b, and Egg/Emgg, gave similar, high rates of 32P transfer from host to parasite during primary infection. The three different compatible genotypes for each gene pair could not be dis- tinguished on the basis of rates of 32F transfer. There were no differences in the rates of 32P transfer for the four genotypes EE/Emg, EE/ m2, pE/Emg, and pE/pmg during primary in- fection. This was consistent with earlier observations that EE/Emg_ does not affect primary infection (47). The genotype EE/Em&_gave a low final infection type, low rates 32 of P transfer from host to parasite during primary infection, and a 101 low primary infection efficiency. In this respect it was similar to the El/Eml and EEQ/Em§9_interactions. The culture MS-Z, which by definition has pfi_because it gives a high infection type seven days after inoculation on the host line with Egg, gave a primary infection efficiency similar to that observed on the host line with Emg_but the formation of elongating secondary hyphae was delayed (Figure 16). The rates of transfer of 32P from host to parasite during primary infec- tion were also lower with this genotype, i.e., pfl/Emfl, than with the other two compatible genotypes, Eg/pm&_and 95/239, If culture MS-Z just had a gene for slower growth it should have developed more slowly on the host line with pmg_also, but it did not. Therefore, the slower development of MS-2 on host lines with Emg_is very probably related to the presence of Egg, When other cultures containing pg_were substituted into the quadratic check, one was found to reduce infection efficiency to 20% and a second to 33% with the pg/Emg_genotype. The pfi/pmfi_genotype gave normal infection efficiency in both cases. These results are important because they bear on where the specificity of gene-for-gene interactions occur. They indicate that a unique interaction occurs with the pfi/Emg_genotype. The simplest explanation of where the specificity of gene-for-gene interactions resides is in the incom- patible interaction (EE/Emg). The data indicate that the transition ‘23:, .. I1 . l 102 in evolution from Efi_to pg_in the parasite did not completely negate the transition in evolution from pmg_to Emg_in the host. There are no reasons we should always expect complete restoration of compati- bility since the pfi/Emg_genotype only has to have a selective advan- tage for the parasite over the incompatible genotype EE/Emfl, The 94, product is probably an altered product of E5 with an altered speci- ficity for the Em4_product. The results from these efforts to complete the quadratic checks for several gene pairs also demonstrate how the gene-for-gene hypoth- esis may play a role in nonspecific or general resistance. The first pfl_isolate used was found to give a slow rate of ESH development in combination with Egg, A high infection efficiency was reached but it was delayed two hours. With the second two isolates with 94, a reduced infection efficiency was obtained on host lines with Egg, These two characteristics, i.e., slow mildew development and the development of fewer normal pustules, have always been associated with "general" resistance. This means that "general" resistance may result from the accumulation of pE/EE_interactions. Techniques with high resolu- tion are needed to detect the differences between the compatible genotypes. All pathogens which carried some form of pE_have probably been selected and eventually the parasites with EE_were lost from the 103 population. The low frequency, or loss, of EE_in a population would explain the difficulty to demonstrate the specific interactions that . are probably occurring with "general" resistance. Manchurian barley which was previously thought to contain no (E) genes for resistance to powdery mildew was shown to possess (E) genes when inoculated with. isolates from the regions of origin of barley (17). This shows that if the avirulent (E) pathogen is available, the (E) genes could be detected and selected. Varieties of potatoes introduced from Europe in 1833 and maintained in the mountains of Basutoland in Africa under almost no selection pressure from late blight were found to be much more susceptible to blight than the susceptible varieties still grown in Europe (52). This could be explained by the accumulation of 257E interactions between Phytophthora igfestans and the European varieties which have been under selection through the years. The mountain-grown varieties would not be expected to possess these particular (E) genes since they were never under selection pressure. The (E) gene in the European varieties could be identified if the avirulent (E) pathogens were still available. If this hypothesis is true, then it should be possible to identify a few of the known (E) genes which are not completely negated by its corresponding (2) gene, similar to what I have done here. These interactions should also be shown to have an additive effect. Then i- 104 with the use of avirulent cultures, which would be readily available, it should be possible to produce new sources of "general” resistance from old sources of specific resistance. This would involve the use of the same principles presently used in breeding for specific resis- tance and would eliminate the hit and miss techniques presently used to transfer "general" resistance from known sources to new varieties. 32F taken up by inoculated plants The reduction in amounts of one to six hours after incoulation showed that a pathogen could inter- act with its host before the pathogen penetrated. Since chalk dust, carborundum, E, graminis uredospores, and E, victoriae conidia did not reduce the amount of 32F taken up by the leaves, the reduction in label uptake was probably not due to the physical presence of par— ticles on the surface of the leaves. As UV radiation decreased the 32 viability of E, graminis conidia there was an increase in the P 2P increased to the level of noninoculated uptake. The uptake of 3 plants with 12% germination. However the 12% which germinated with the 60 second dose of UV radiation had malformed germ tubes. Mount and Ellingboe (33) reported lower UV doses given to E, graminis conidia resulted in the formation of no elongating secondary hyphae. Thus, the germinated conidia at the 60 second dose would probably not have penetrated the host. We can clearly see that germinating conidia on the surface of the leaf were responsible for the reduced 105 amount of label taken up by the leaves one to six hours after inocula— tion. The decreased uptake of 32P by inoculated plants can be ex- plained by the decreased transpiration rates. The reduced transpira- tion rates can be attributed to the closure of stonates as determined from measurements with a viscous flow porometer. The transpiration rates of inoculated and noninoculated near- isogenic wheat lines revealed lower transpiration rates by three hours after inoculation in incompatible as well as compatible parasite/host combinations. Inoculation of wheat with conidia of E; graminis f. sp. 32P taken up by the leaves. This Egrg§j_also reduced the amount of form-species on wheat represented an incompatible parasite/host inter- action. The spores did germinate and form appressoria on wheat. Thus this effect is not specific for the compatible or incompatible para- Site/host genotypes. Decreased transpiration rates have been reported for barley infected with E, graminis f. sp. Eggggj_one to seven days after inocu- lation (26). Decreased transpiration rates of bean two days after infection by Uromyces phaseoli have also been reported (12). Our data Show a decrease in wheat transpiration as early as three hours after inoculation and before fungus penetration of the host, which is much earlier than previously reported (26). The stomates of wheat were shown to close upon attack by the germ tubes of leaf rust uredospores 106 which penetrate the host through the stomates (9). The data reported here indicate that the stomates are responding to some stimulis(i) produced by the germinating conidia of E, graminis before there was direct penetration of host cells. The possibility may exist that, in the previous study (9), many of the stomates may have been closing in the near vicinity of the germinating uredospores and not just those stomates being attacked by the pathogen. Stomate closure induced by E, graminis may have been initiated by diffusable substances produced by the germinating conidia, but abscisic acid was not demonstrated to be present in germinating con- idia. None of the extracts made of germinating conidia were shown to reduce transpiration. Inoculated plants were shown to have reduced transpiration rates throughout the primary infection process. Even though inocu- lated leaves transpired less, and took up less 32P, the epidermis of inoculated plants contained more 32 P than did the epidermis of noninoculated plants by 26 hours after inoculation. This could be the result of a nutrient sink effect created by the developing fungus. A sink effect has been reported during later stages of mildew devel- opment (44). When transpiration stress was removed from the leaves by placing them in 100% RH while taking up 32F from 25 to 30 hours after inoculation, the epidermis of inoculated leaves contained 107 32 32 less P. The increase in P activity in the epidermis was probably due to increased cuticular transpiration around the areas of penetra- 32P at the tion. This would have the effect of concentrating the epidermis. Transpiration effects have been overlooked in most reports of nutrient sinks created by developing parasites. Transpiration changes during primary infection of wheat have explained all the dif- ferences in 32P uptake between inoculated and noninoculated plants. The incompatibility of an interaction seemed to have an effect on transpiration rates, especially at times when incompatibility is being expressed. Transpiration rates of inoculated and noninoculated me_plants are not significantly different from 22 to 30 hours. This is probably due to increased cuticular transpiration due to fungal development. With El/Eml_and EEE/EmEE, transpiration differences be- tween inoculated and noninoculated plants were highly significant from 22 to 30 hours. This could be due to inhibition of fungal develop- ment. Transpiration rates of noninoculated and inoculated Emg_plants with a culture of EE_were identical from 22 to 30 hours. This might be explained by the nature of the Eg/Emfl‘incompatible interaction. At approximately 22 hours many of the parasite units collapse concomitant with the browning of the host cell in which it had penetrated. The possibility exists that the dead necrotic cell allows more water loss or causes more disruption of the cuticle than the development of a 108 compatible interaction. Thus the transpiration rates of inoculated and noninoculated plants would be expected to be similar. The ability of a pathogen and its host to interact before penetration of the host by the pathogen has clearly been demonstrated. These results emphasize the need for more investigations into the very earliest detectable interactions between parasite and host to determine those interactions that are critical to the establishment of compatible or incompatible parasite/host relationships. SUMMARY The environmental conditions necessary for synchronous development of the parasite during primary infection were shown to affect the amount of 32P taken up by the leaves and translocated 32 to the epidermis. The lights increased the amount of P in the leaf and the amount transferred to the parasite. 32P transfer rates reflected the relative compatibilities of the interactions studied. Interactions with little fungal devel- Opment had lower rates of transfer, while fully compatible interac- 32P transfer did not tions had high rates of transfer. Rates of show differences between compatible and incompatible interactions as early as did 355 transfer rates (50) or production of elongating 32 secondary hyphae (47). Rates of P transfer were observed earlier 35S transfer and the amount of 32F transferred was much higher. than The four possible parasite/host genotypes (the quadratic check) for each interacting gene pair were evaluated for their effect on final infection type seven days after inoculation, on 32P transfer from host to parasite, and on the formation of elongating secondary hyphae (ESH). With all gene pairs the final infection type of the 109 110 three compatible interactions were similar. Only the incompatible interaction (EE/me) resulted in a low infection type. The compatible interactions involving E1_and E91, EE_and Egg, E§E_and Pm3b had sim- 32 32 ilar rates of P transfer were not sim- P transfer. The rates of ilar for the compatible interactions involving Efl_and Egg, The pE/Emg_ genotype had a reduced rate of transfer when compared to gg/pmfl_and. EE/pmfl, The production of ESH was also delayed with pE/Emfl, Two other isolates containing pfi_resulted in a reduction in the percent of parasites that produced ESH. Thus the mutations from Eg_to 91_in the parasite have not completely negated the change in the host from pmg_to Egg, This indicates that specificity of gene-for-gene inter- actions is for incompatibility, not compatibility. It also demon- strates how the gene-for-gene hypothesis might play a role in general or horizontal resistance. Germinating conidia of E, graminis were shown to reduce host transpiration rates before penetration occurred. The transpiration reduction was a result of stomate closure induced by the germinating conidia. Extracts of germinating conidia did not reduce transpiration rates and abscisic acid was not detected in the conidia. The reduc- tion in transpiration continued through primary infection and was 32 shown to be responsible for less P uptake by inoculated plants than noninoculated plants during primary infection. 111 Metabolic sinks induced by E, graminis, which concentrated 32P at infection sites in the epidermis of inoculated plants during 32 primary infection, were not demonstrated. Any accumulation of P in the epidermis was due to increased cuticular transpiration caused by disruption of the cuticle by the developing fungus. LITERATURE CITED 10. LITERATURE CITED ALLEN, P. J. and R. D. GODDARD. 1938. A respiratory study of powdery mildew of wheat. American Journal of Botany 25:613-621. ALVIM, P. de T. 1965. A new type of porometer for measuring stomatal openings and its use in irrigation studies. Unesco Arid Zone Res. 25:325-329. ARNDT, F. 1943. Org. Syn., Coll. Vol. 2, John Wiley and Sons, New York, N.Y. 165 pp. BOYER, J. S. 1970. Differing sensitivity of photosynthesis to low leaf water potentials in corn and soybean. Plant Phys- iology 46:236-239. BRIGGLE, L. W., and A. L. SCHAREN. 1961. Resistance in triticum vulgare to infection by Erysiphe graminis f. sp. tritici as influenced by the stage of development of the host plant. Plant Disease Reporter 45:846-850. BRIGGLE, L. W. 1966. Three loci in wheat involving resistance to Erysiphe graminis f. sp. tritici. Crop. Sci. 6:461-465. . BRIGGLE, L. W. 1969. Near-isogenic lines of wheat with genes for resistance to Erysiphe graminis f. Sp. tritici. Crop. Sci. 9:70-75. BRINKERHOFF, L. A. 1970. Variation in Xanthomonas malvacearum and its relation to control. Ann. Rev. Phytopathol. 8:85-110. CALDWELL, R. M. and G. M. STONE. 1936. Relation of stomatal function of wheat to invasion and infection by leaf rust (Puccinia triticina). J. Agr. Res. 52:917-932. DAY, P. R. 1960. Variation in phytopathogenic fungi. Ann. Rev. Microbiol. 14:1-16. 112 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 113 DELP, C. J. 1954. Effect of temperature and humidity on the grape powdery mildew fungus. Phytopathology 44:615-626. DUNIWAY, J. M. and R. D. DURBIN. 1971. Some effects of Uromyces phaseoli on the transpiration rate and stomatal response of bean leaves. Phytopathology 61:114-119. EDGAR, R. S. and I. LIELAUSIS. 1964. Temperature-sensitive mu- tants of bacteriophage T40: their isolation and genetic characterization. Genetics. 49:649-662. ELLINGBOE, A. H. 1968. Inoculum production and infection by foliage pathogens. Ann. Rev. Phytopath. 6:317-330. ELLINGBOE, A. H. 1972. Genetics and physiology of primary in- fection by Erysiphe graminis. Phytopathology. 62:401-406. ELLINGBOE, A. H. Genetics of host-parasite interactions. Manu- script submitted for publication. EYAL, Z., R. YURMAN, J. G. MOSEMAN, and I. WAHL. 1973. Use of mobile nurseries in pathogenicity studies of Erysiphe graminis hordei on Hordeum spontaneum. Phytopathology. 63:1330-1334. FLOR, H. H. 1946. Genetics of pathogenicity in Melampsora lini. J. Agr. Research. 73:335-337. FLOR, H. H. 1955. Host-parasite interactions in flax rust--its genetics and other implications. Phytopathology. 45:680-685. HATCHETT, J. H. 1969. Race E, sixth race of the Hessian fly, Mayetiola destructor, discovered in Georgia wheat fields. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Amer. 62:677-678. HSU, S. C., and A. H. ELLINGBOE. 1972. Elongation of secondary hyphae and transfer of 35S from barley to Erysiphe graminis f. sp. hordei during primary infection. Phytopathology. 62:876-882. JARVIK, J. and D. BOTSTEIN. 1973. A genetic method for deter- mining the order of events in a biological pathway. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 70:2046-2050. “t1:- --. -..._ .--“.-. .. :- --._... . I ___ '1 .7 23. 24. 25. 26. 27. 28. 29. 30. 31. 32. 33. 114 JONES, F. G. W. and D. M. PARROTT. 1965. The genetic relationship of pathotypes of Heterodera rostochiensis Woll. which reproduce on hybrid potatoes with genes for resistance. Ann. Appl. Biol. 56:27-36. ' LARGE, E. C., and D. A. DOLING. 1963. Effect of mildew on yield of winter wheat. Plant Pathology. 12:128-130. LOEGERING, W. Q. 1966. The relationship between host and pathogen in stem rust of wheat. (Proc. 2nd Int. Wheat Genetics Symp. ; : Lund. 1963) Hereditas, Suppl. Vol. 2:167-177. ;” l MAJERINK, 0. 1965. Water balance changes of barley infected by Erysiphe graminis 0.0. f. sp. hordei Marchal. Phytopath. Z. -w~, 53:145-153. 5 ‘ MASRI, S. S. 1965. The development of appressoria, haustoria and secondary hyphae during the primary infection of wheat and barley by Erysiphe graminis. Ph.D. Thesis, Michigan State University. 89 pp. MASRI, S. 5., and A. H. ELLINGBOE. 1966. Germination of conidia and formation of appressoria and secondary hyphae in Erysiphe graminis f. sp. tritici. Phytopathology. 56:304-308. MASRI, S. S. and A. H. ELLINGBOE. 1966. Primary infection of wheat and barley by Erysiphe graminis. Phytopathology. 56:389-395. MOSEMAN, J. G. 1959. Host-pathogen interaction of the genes far resistance in Hordeum vulgare and for pathogenicity in Erysiphe graminis f. sp. hordei. Phytopathology. 49:469-472. MOSEMAN, J. G. 1966. Genetics of powdery mildews. Ann. Rev. Phytopath. 4:269-290. MOUNT, M. S. 1968. Environmental effects and transfer events during primary infection of wheat by Erysiphe graminis. Ph.D. Thesis, Michigan State University. 112 pp. MOUNT, M. S., and A. H. ELLINGBOE. 1968. Effects of ultraviolet radiation on the establishment of Erysiphe graminis f. sp. tritici on wheat. Phytopathology. 58:1171-1175. 34. 35. 36. 37. 39. 40. 41. 42. 43. 44. 45. 115 MOUNT, M. s.. and A. H. ELLINGBOE. 1959. 32? and 353 transfer from susceptible wheat to Erysiphe graminis f. sp. tritici during primary infection. Phytopathology. 59:235. NAIR, K. R. S., and A. H. ELLINGBOE. 1962. A method of con- trolled inoculations with conidiospores of Erysiphe graminis var. tritici. Phytopathology. 52:714. NAIR, K. R. S., and A. H. ELLINGBOE. 1965. Germination of conidia of Erysiphe graminis f. sp. tritici. Phytopathology. 55:365-368. NUTMAN, P. S. 1969. Genetics of symbiosis and nitrogen fixation in legumes. Proc. Roy. Soc. 172:417-37. PERSON, C., D. J. SAMBORSKI, and R. ROHRINGER. 1962. The gene- for-gene concept. Nature. 194:561-562. POWERS, H. R., JR., and W. J. SANDO. 1960. Genetic control of the host-parasite relationship in wheat powdery mildew. Phytopathology. 50:454-457. PRATT, R. 1938. Respiration of wheat infected with powdery mildew. Science. 88:62-63. PUGSLEY, A. T., and M. V. CARTER. 1953. The resistance of twelve varieties of Triticum vulgare to Erysiphe graminis tritici. Australian J. Biol. Sciences. 6:335-346. ROWELL, J. R., W. Q. LOEGERING, and H. R. POWERS, JR. 1963. Genetic model for physiologic studies of mechanisms governing development of infection type in wheat stem rust. Phyto- pathology. 53:932-937. SEMPIO, C. 1950. Metabolic resistance to plant diseases. Phyto- pathology. 40:799-819. SHAW. M., S. A. BROWN, and D. R. JONES. 1954. Uptake of radio- active carbon and phosphorus by parasitized leaves. Nature. 173:769-798. SHEPHERD, K. W., and G. M. E. MAYO. 1972. Genes conferring specific plant disease resistance. Science. 175:375-380. 46. 47. 48. 49. 50. 51. 52. 53. 54. 116 SLESINSKI, R. S. 1969. Genetic control of primary interactions during infection of wheat by Erysiphe graminis f. sp. tritici. Ph.D. Thesis, Michigan State University. 107 pp. SLESINSKI, R. S., and A. H. ELLINGBOE. 1969. The genetic control of primary infection of wheat by Erysiphe graminis f. sp. tritici. Phytopathology. 59:1833-1837. SLESINSKI, R. S., and A. H. ELLINGBOE. 1970. Gene-for-gene interactions during primary infection of wheat by Erysiphe graminis. Phytopathology. 60:1068-1070. SLESINSKI, R. S., and A. H. ELLINGBOE. 1971. Transfer of 355 from wheat to the powdery mildew fungus with compatible and incompatible parasite/host genotypes. Can. J. Bot. 49:303- 310. STUCKEY, R. E. 1973. Elongation of secondary hyphae and trans- location of 35S and 3H from host to parasite during primary infection of wheat by Erysiphe graminis f. sp. tritici. Ph.D. Thesis, Michigan State University. 119 pp. SUZUKI, D. T. 1970. Temperature-sensitive mutations in Drosophila melanogaster. Science. 170:695-706. VAN DER PLANK, J. E. T953. Plant diseaseszepidemics and con- trol. New York: Academic. 349 pp. WALKER, J. C. 1957. The powdery mildews. In Plant Pathology. pp. 312-318. McGraw-Hill Book Co., New York. WHITE, N. H., and E. P. BAKER. 1954. Host-pathogen relations in powdery mildew of barley. I. Histology of tissue reac- tions. Phytopathology. 44:657-662. .. a o . . 3 4 (1.3.... i 2: «115.1411. well if. ”'11111111111111111111“