CHARACTERIZATION OF WCWRGNANS FURMED BY A CELL~FREE SYSTEM FROM W MNOR Emma for the W of Ph. 6. MICHEGAR STATE UM‘JERSW GENRE MEMO. 3R... E 3 7,5 This is to certify that the thesis entitled CHARACTERIZATION OF APIOGALACTURONANS FORMED BY A CELL-FREE SYSTEM FROM LEMNA MINOR presented by Leonard Mas caro , Jr. has been accepted towards fulfillment of the requirements for Ph. D. degree in Biochemistry PM KW Major professor Date February 11, 1975 0-7 639 ? I ‘5" ? snuggle. av ‘nnns 2 sons 3 l 800', BlNDERY INC. LlBRARY BINDFRS meavom. mm; ‘W ’_ 3,. 1 \ ABSTRACT CHARACTERIZATION OF APIOGALACTURONANS FORMED BY A CELL-FREE SYSTEM FROM LEMNA MINOR BY Leonard Mascaro, Jr. The products formed from UDP-D-apiose and UDP- D-galacturonic acid in a cell-free system from £2223 miner have been characterized. Characterization experi- ments have established that the products are apiogalac- turonans. UDP-D-[U-14C1Apiose (containing some UDP-D- [U-14C1xylose) and UDP-D-[U-14C]ga1acturonic acid were incubated with a particulate enzyme preparation from E, miggg. At the end of the incubation the reaction mixtures were extracted with methanol and water. The radioactive material synthesized from UDP-D-[U-14C1- apiose and UDP-D-[U-14clgalacturonic acid and remaining in the insoluble residue is referred to as D-[U-14 l C]apiose product and D-[U- 4C]galacturonic acid product, respec- tively. Based on radioactivity measurements extraction of the products with ammonium oxalate solubilized 87% of the D-[U-14C1apiose product and 91% of the Leonard Mascaro, Jr. D-[U-14 C]galacturonic acid product. The radioactive materials that were solubilized by ammonium oxalate treatment are referred to as D-[U-14C1apiose solubilized product and D-[U-14 C]galacturonic acid solubilized pro- duct. Fungal pectinase could hydrolyze both solubilized products. Hydrolysis of the D-[U-14C]apiose solubilized product at pH 1 showed that 75% of the radioactivity was present in D-[U-14C1apiose and 25% in D—[U-14C1xylose (25%). The D-[U-14C]galacturonic acid solubilized pro- duct was found to contain its radioactivity in D-[U-14CJ- galacturonic acid and a small amount (less than 6%) in D-[u-14c1xylose. D-[U-14C1Apiose solubilized product released -14c]apiose and [U-l4C1apiobiose when hydrolyzed at D- [U pH 4. A similar release of apiobiose has been reported .for authentic apiogalacturonans. When [U-14C1apiobiose 1 was isolated from the D-[U- 4C]apiose product, reduced by NaBH4 treatment, and hydrolyzed, the radioactivity l4C]apiose and D-[U-14C1apiitol. was found equally in D-[U- This indicates that both moieties of the apiobiosyl side chains were synthesized in XiEEQ’ Five fractions were obtained when D-[U-14C1- galacturonic acid was chromatographed on a DEAE-Sephadex column. The fraction which eluted with 0.25 M NaCl (fraction D) contained 40% of the recovered Leonard Mascaro, Jr. radioactivity. When similarly chromatographed on the DEAE-Sephadex column, the D-[U-14C1apiose solubilized product was also recovered in 5 fractions that eluted in the same positions of the gradient as seen for the D-[U-14C]galacturonic acid product. The fractions were labelled, in order of elution, A through E. The fractions l4c]- eluted from the column in order of increasing D-[U- apiose content. Fraction D which eluted with 0.25 M NaCl contained 21% of the recovered radioactivity. Analysis of this fraction showed that 88% of its radio- activity was contained in D-[U-14C]apiose and the remainder in D-[U-14C1xylose. Hydrolysis of fraction D at pH 4 released 63% of the D-[U-14CJapiose, the majority as [U-14C]apiobiose. D-[U-l4 C]Apiose solubilized product was also synthesized in the presence of exogenous UDP-D-galac- turonic acid and was chromatographed on the DEAE-Sephadex column. The chromatogram showed that there was increased synthesis of the more acidic products. Fraction D which eluted with 0.25 M NaCl contained 53% of the radioactivity recovered from the column. The amount of radioactivity 1 in Fraction D contained in D-[U- 4C]apiose was 95% with the rest contained in D-[U-14C]xylose. Hydrolysis at pH 4 released 81% of the D-[U-l4 C]apiose in Fraction D. Gel chromatography of D-[U-14C]apiose product and D-[U-14CIgalacturonic acid product showed that both Leonard Mascaro, Jr. contained molecules of different sizes. Both products eluted from a Bio-gel P-300 column over its entire fractionation range. Chromatography on a Bio—gel P-lOO column showed that the D-[U-14CIga1acturonic acid solubilized product contained molecules of smaller size than did the D-[U-14C1apiose solubilized product. Dialysis in water or chromatography on DEAE-Sephadex caused a decrease in the amount of high molecular weight material in the solubilized products as determined by gel-chromatography. Large, medium, and small molecular weight com- ponents of the D-[U-14C1apiose solubilized product were isolated by chromatography on Bio-gel P-300 and were found not to vary significantly in D-[U-14C1apiose and D-[U-14clxylose content. Addition of UDP-D-galacturonic acid to the reaction mixture used to synthesize D-[U-14CJ- apiose solubilized product resulted in an increase in the size of the small molecular weight components. As D-[U-14C]galacturonic acid product was synthesized for increasing lengths of time the size of the product was also increased. On the other hand, as the length of l4C]apiose product incubation used to synthesize D-[U- was increased the percent of radioactivity found in the large molecular weight component decreased. These results show that the particulate enzyme preparation from E. minor synthesizes a product from Leonard Mascaro, Jr. UDP-D-apiose and UDP-D-galacturonic acid which has a structure similar to the apiogalacturonans of the cell wall of E, E3325. The data obtained from the gel chromatography experiments are consistent with a mechanism of synthesis where D-apiose side chains are added after formation of the polygalacturonic backbone. CHARACTERIZATION OF APIOGALACTURONANS FORMED BY A CELL-FREE SYSTEM FROM LEMNA MINOR BY 4 DWC‘ Leonard Mascaro, Jr. A DISSERTATION Submitted to Michigan State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Department of Biochemistry 1975 To Kathryn and my parents ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to thank Dr. Paul K. Kindel for his guidance and advice during the course of this research project. He has served both as a colleague and a friend. I would also like to thank Dr. Y. T. Pan and Edwin Leinbach for their comradeship and help. Mr. Leinbach prepared the UDPlU-14C1GalUA used in this work. The technical assistance of Mrs. Beth Laine and Mrs. Linda Bissett is also appreciated. I thank the members of my guidance committee, Drs. Loran Bieber, William Wells, Derek Lamport, Deborah Delmer, and Clarence Suelter for the time that they have spent reviewing my work. Drs. John Speck and A. Kivilaan have also given me much advice on polysaccharide chemistry. I also especially thank my wife, Kathryn, for the loving encouragement and sound scientific advice that she has given me. iii TABLE LIST OF TABLES . . . . LIST OF FIGURES. . . . LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS. . INTRODUCTION. . . . . LITERATURE REVIEW . . . The Plant Cell Wall. . Components of the Cell Morphology of Cell Wall Synthesis OF CONTENTS Wall Structure of the Cell Wall. Role of the Golgi Apparatus Orientation of Cellulose Microfibrils Biosynthesis of Cell Wall Polysacchrides. Synthesis of Glucans. Synthesis of Matrix Polysaccharides. Possible Role of Lipid Intermediate. Solubilization of Polysaccharide Synthesizing System. . . . . D-APiOSe o o o o 0 Chemistry . . . . Occurrence in Nature. Identification of Apiogalacturonans in L. minor . . . . . UDPAp1 . . . . . In Vitro Synthesis of Apiogalacturonans iv Page viii ix xii 27 28 28 28 29 31 33 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES . . . . . . . . . Materials . . . . . General Methods . . . Culture of L. Minor. . Paper Chromatography . . . . DEAE-Sephadex Column Chromatography . . Isolation of Particulate Enzyme Preparation. Biosynthesis of Radioactive Product and Solu- bilized Product . . . . . . . . . Partial Acid Hydrolysis with Fuming HCl . . Hydrolysis at pH 1 . . . . . . . . . Hydrolysis at pH 4 . . . . . . . Hydrolysis of Solubilized Product with Fungal Pectinase . . . . . . . . . . . . RESULTS 0 O O O I O O O O O O O O O Biosynthesis of Product and Solubilized Product Biosynthesis of D-[U-14C]Apiose Product and Solubilized Product . . . . . . Biosynthesis of D-[U-14C1Galacturonic Acid, D-[U-14C]Glucuronic Acid, and D-[U-14C]- Xylose Products and Solubilized Products . Addition of UDPGalUA, UDPGlcUA, and UDPXyl to the Reaction Mixture Used to Synthesize D-[U-14C]Apiose Product and Solubilized Product . . . . . . . . . . . . Partial Acid Hydrolysis of D-[U-14C1Apiose Product . . . . . . . . . . . . Acid Hydrolysis at pH 1 . . . . . . . . Hydrolysis of D-[U-14C1Apiose Solubilized Product . . . . Hydrolysis of D-[U-l‘iCJGalacturonic1 Acid, D- [U-1C]Glucuronic Acid, and D-[U-14CI- Xylose Solubilized Products. . . . . . Hydrolysis of Authentic Apiogalacturonan from Whole Plants. . . . . Hydrolysis of D-[U-15C1Apiose Solubilized Product Synthesized in the Presence of Nonradioactive Sugar Nucleotides . . . . Hydrolysis of D-[U-14C]Apiose Solubilized Product at pH 4 O O O O O O O O O O O O O Page 36 36 37 38 39 39 4O 41 44 44 45 45 47 47 47 50 51 51 53 53 58 62 64 66 Gel Chromatography of D-[U-1 Hydrolysis of D-[U-14C]Apiose Solubilized Pro- duct Synthesized in the Absence and Pre- sence of Nonradioactive Sugar Nucleotides . Release of D-[U-14C1Apiose and [U-14C]Apio- biose as a Function of Hydrolysis Time . . Hydrolysis of [U-14C]Apiobiitol . . . . . Sodium Chloride Fractionation of D-[U-14C]- Apiose Solubilized Product. . . . . . . DEAE-Sephadex Column Chromatography . . . . Chromatography of D-[U-14C]Apiose Solubilized Product . . . . Chromatography of D-[U-14C1Galacturonic Acid Solubilized Product . . . Chromatography of D-[U-14C]Apiose Solubilized Product Synthesized in the Presence of UDPGalUA . . . . . Chromato raphy of D-[U-14C]Glucuronic Acid and D-[U-1C]Xylose Solubilized Products. . . Chromatography of D-[U-14 C]Apiose Solubilized Products Synthesized in the Presence of UDPGlCUA and UDPXyl . . . . . Characterization of Fractions Obtained from the 1DEAE-Sephadex Chromatography of D- [U-14C]Apiose Solubilized Product Syn- thesized in the Absence and Presence of Nonradioactive Sugar Nucleotides . . . Rechromatography of Fractions Obtained from DEAE-Sephadex Column Chromatography of D-[U-14C]Apiose Solubilized Product . . . Product and D-[U-14C]Galacturonic Acid Solubilized Product . . . . . "Degradation" of D- U-14C]Apiose Solubilized Product and D-[U- 4C]Ga1acturonic Acid Solubilized Product . . Effect of UDPGalUA on the Size of D-[U-14C]- Apiose Solubilized Product. . . . . Effect of Incubation Time on the Size of D- [U-14C1Apiose Solubilized Product and D- [U-1 4C]Ga1acturonic Acid Solubilized Product . . . . . . . . . Pectinase Hydrolysis of Solubilized Products . Hydrolysis of D-[U-14C]Apiose Solubilized Product . . . . Hydrolysis of D-[U-14CIGalacturonic Acid Solubilized Product . . . . . . . . vi 4C]Apiose Solubilized Page 66 70 70 73 76 76 79 82 88 91 92 98 103 109 123 123 131 131 136 Page DISCUSSION 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O 140 Characterization of Solubilized Products . . . 140 Identification of D-[U-14C1Apiose Solubilized Product as an Apiogalacturonan . . . . . . 145 Possible Mechanisms of Synthesis . . . . . 157 Degradation of D-[U-14C]Apiose and D-[U-14C1- Galacturonic Acid Solubilized Products . . . 161 Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 164 LIST OF REFERENCES . . . . . . . . . . . 166 vii LIST OF TABLES Table Page 1. Biosynthesis of D-[U-14C]A iose, D-[U-14C]- Galacturonic Acid, D-[U- 4C]G1ucuronic Acid, and D-[U-14C]Xylose Products and Solubilized Products . . . . . . . . 48 2. Synthesis of D-[U-l4CJApiose Product and Solubilized Product in the Presence and Absence of Nonradioactive Sugar Nucleo- tides . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52 3. Acid Hydrolysis of D-[U-14C]Apiose Solu- bilized Product with Various Concentrations of Trifluoroacetic Acid . . . . . . . 56 4. Hydrolysis at pH 1 of D-[U-14CJApiose Solu- bilized Product Synthesized in the Presence of Nonradioactive Sugar Nucleotides . . . 65 5. Hydrolysis at pH 4 of D-[U-14C]Apiose Solu- bilized Product Synthesized in the Absence and Presence of Nonradioactive Sugar Nucleotides . . . . . . . . . . . 69 6. Distribution of Radioactivity in Fractions Obtained After DEAE- Sephadex Chroma- tography of D-[U-14C]Apiose Soluble Product Synthesized in the Presence of Varying Quantities of UDPGalUA. . . . . 86 7. Release of D-[U-14C]Apiose and [U-14C1Apio- biose from Fractions Obtained from DEAE- Sephadex Column Chromatography of D- [U-14C]Apiose Solubilized Product Synthe- sized in the Absence of Nonradioactive Sugar Nucleotide and in the Presence of UDPGalUA . . . . . . . . . . . . 94 8. Rechromatography of Fractions Obtained from DEAE-Sephadex Column Chromatography of D-[U-14C]Apiose Solubilized Product . . . 99 viii Figure 1. 2. 10. LIST OF FIGURES Diagrammatic representation of the cell wall Radiochromatogram scan of the products obtained from the partial acid hydrolysis Radiochromatogram scan of the products obtained after hydrolysis at pH 1 of D-[U-14C]apiose solubilized product . . Radiochromatogram scan of the products obtained from the hydrolysis at pH 4 of D-[U-14C]apiose solubilized product syn- thesized in the presence of UDPGalUA . . Time-course of the hydrolysis at pH 4 of D- [U-14C]apiose solubilized product synthe- sized in the presence of UDPGalUA . . . Radiochromatogram scan of the products obtained from the acid hydrolysis of [U-I4C1api0biit01 o o o o o o o o DEAE-Siphadex column chromatogram of D- [U-1 C]apiose solubilized product . . . DEAE-Sephadex column chromatogram of D- [U-14C]galacturonic acid solubilized product. . . . . . . . . . . . DEAE-Sephadex column chromatogram of D- [U-14C]apiose solubilized product synthe- sized in the presence of UDPGalUA . . . DEAE-Sephadex column chromatograms of D- [U-14C]glucuronic acid solubilized product (a) and D-[U-14C]xylose solu- bilized product (b). . . . . . . . ix Page 55 6O 68 ’72 75 78 81 84 90 Figure Page 11. Bio-Gel P- 300 column chromatograms of D- [U-14C]apiose solubilized product and D- [U- 4C]galacturonic acid solubilized product . . . . . . . . . . . . . 105 12. Bio-Gel P- 300 column chromatograms of D— [U-14C]apiose solubilized product (a) and the rechromatography of selected fractions (b) O O O O O O O O O 0 O O O O 107 13. Bio-Gel P- 100 column chromatograms of D- [U—14C]apiose solubilized product (a) and D-[U-14C]ga1acturonic acid solubilized Product (b). . . . . . . . . . . . 111 14. Bio-Gel P-300 column chromatograms of non- dialyzed, water dial zed, and sodium phos- phate dialyzed D-[U- 4C]apiose solubilized product . . . . . . . . . . . . . 114 15. Bio-Gel P-3OO column chromatograms of D- [U-14C]apiose solubilized product (a) and the rechromatography of a selected fraction after dialysis in water (b) . . . . . . 118 16. Bio-Gel P-300 column chromatography of D- [U-14C]apiose solubilized product after dialysis in sodium phosphate buffer and after elution from a DEAF-Sephadex column. . 122 17. Bio-Gel P-300 column chromatograms of D- [U-14C]apiose solubilized product synthe- sized in the presence and absence of UDPGalUA. . . . . . . . . . . . . 125 18. Bio-Gel P- 100 column chromatograms of D- [U-14C]ga1acturonic acid solubilized pro- duct synthesized in 0.5, 2, and 15 min. . . 127 19. Bio-Gel P- -300 column chromatograms of D- [U-14C]apiose solubilized product synthe- sized in 0.5 min and 15 min . . . . . . 130 20. Bio-Gel P- -100 column chromatograms of D- [U-14C]apiose solubilized product that was untreated and was treated with pectinase . . 133 Figure Page 21. Bio-Gel P-30 column chromatogram of D- [U-14C]apiose solubilized product that was treated with pectinase . . . . . . 135 22. Bio-Gel P-lOO column chromatograms of D- [U-14C]ga1acturonic acid solubilized product treated and untreated with fungal pectinase . . . . . . . . . 138 xi BSA GDPGlc GDPMan UDPAp1 UDPAra UDPGalUA UDPGlc UDPGlcUA UDPXyl UTP LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS bovine serum albumin guanosine 5'-(a-D-glucopyranosy1 pyrophos- phate) guanosine 5'-(a-D-mannopyranosy1 pyrophos- phate) uridine 5'-(a-D—apio-D-furanosyl pyrophosphate) uridine 5'-(a-L-arabinopyranosy1 pyrophos- phate) uridine 5'-(a-D-galactopyranosyluronic acid pyrophosphate) uridine 5'—(a-D-g1ucopyranosy1 pyrophosphate) uridine 5'-(a-D-glucopyranosyluronic acid pyrophosphate) uridine 5'-(a-D-xylopyranosy1 pyrophosphate) uridine triphOSphate total volume void volume xii INTRODUCTION Cell-free preparations from a number of plants have been prepared which contain glycosyl transferase activities that are believed to be involved in cell wall synthesis. Recently, a particulate enzyme preparation was isolated from Lemna minor (duckweed) that incorporated radioactivite sugars from UDP[U-14C]Api and UDP[U-14C]- GalUA into products which were insoluble in methanol and water. The cell wall of E. minor contains large quanti- ties of apiogalacturonans. If the products synthesized in_zi££2 with the cell-free system from L, minor have a structure similar to authentic apioqalacturonans then this will confirm that the particulate enzyme prepar- ation contains an enzymatic system capable of synthesiz- ing an actual cell wall polysaccharide. The goal of this research was to characterize 14C]Api and UDP[U-14C]- the products obtained when UDP[U— GalUA were incubated with particulate enzyme preparation from E. minor and to determine whether the products synthesized in vitro are the same as authentic apiogalacturonan. A second goal was to gain insight into the mechanism of cell wall synthesis by studying the structure of the products synthesized under dif- ferent reaction conditions. Some of these data have been presented previously (1). LITERATURE REVIEW The Plant Cell Wall Components of the Cell Wall Plant cells contain a cell wall exterior to the plasmalemma. The cell wall is important for the structure and growth of the cell. This wall is composed of lignin, carbohydrate, and protein. Extraction of the cell walls of higher plants with such divalent metal chelating agents as ammonium oxalate, sodium hexametaphosphate, or EDTA results in the release of a polysaccharide fraction rich in D-galac- turonic acid from the cell wall (2). This material has been termed pectin and is a complex mixture of acidic and neutral polysaccharides. Such neutral sugars as D-galac- tose, L-arabinose, D-xylose, L-rhamnose, and L-fucose have been found in pectin (2). D-Galacturonic acid is present in the cell wall as an a-l,4-ga1acturonan with small amounts of L-rhamnose contained in the backbone (2, 3). The galacturonic acid resudues are often found esterified at carbon atom 6 with methanol (3). Some of the galacturonans as isolated in pectin are free of neutral sugars while other galacturonans contain large amounts of neutral sugars bound as side chains to the uronic acid backbone. A neutral polysaccharide found in pectin is a B-l,4-D-galactan with side chains of L-arabinose. This arabinogalactan can occur in pectin as a pure polysaccharide or as neutral blocks connected to galacturnans (3, 4). Other neutral polysacchrides isolated from pectin are D-galactan and L-arabinan (2). Those polysacchrides in the cell wall which are neither pectins nor the 8—1,4-glucan, cellulose, are known as hemicelluloses (5). These polysacchrides are not structurally related to cellulose. Hemicellulose polysaccharides are generally solubilized from the cell wall by alkali extraction and the following polysacchride structures are representative of them: B-l,4-xy1ans with side chains of L-arabinose and 4-0-methyl glucuronic acid, B-l,4-mannans which occur alone or with side chains of D-glucose or D-galactose, and B-l,3-galactans with L-arabinose side chains (5). Several different proteins are contained in plant cell walls. These proteins are involved in the metabolism of the wall and as structural components. The cell walls of Zea mays and Avena sativa both contain proteins capable of autolytically degrading the wall (6, 7). A hydroxyproline-rich protein was found in the primary cell wall of sycamore and bean cells grown in suspension culture (8). This protein was given the name "extensin" by Lamport and was postulated to be a structural component in the wall which acts to orientate the matrix polysacchrides and control cell elongation (9). During cell elongation there is need for an increase in the plasticity of the cell wall and extensin may function by allowing the cellulose microfibrils to slide over one another (9). The hydroxyproline and serine residues of extensin are attached O-glycosidically to L-arabinose and D-galactose, respectively, and therefore extensin seems to be linked to arabinogalactan (10, ll, 12). Structure of the Cell Wall The cell wall, as seen with the electron micro- scope, has an ordered structure. Figure 1 is a diagram- matic representation of the cell wall of a mature plant cell (13). The cell wall is divided into two major layers; the primary wall which is formed during cell growth and the secondary wall which is formed during cell differentiation (14). The period of cell differen- tiation with resultant formation of the secondary wall is referred to as secondary thickening. The primary wall consists of a loose, random network of cellulose micro- fibrils embedded in a matrix of pectins and hemicelluloses (14). The secondary wall is divided into three layers, each of which has a highly organized microfibril structure that is orientated differently in each of .Amoav Ham3 Hams on» no cowumuemmmummu OHuMEEmnm6flo .H musmwm .3; tween. .93. 1381.25 raucouom 'U'UUUUU" .3 8.3. 2521.9: Emucooom .2. ---..- 3) .96. 3:51.25 beecoumm the layers (14). Analysis of birch, ash, sycamore, and pine cell walls showed that the secondary wall contained cellulose, hemicellulose, and lignin, but not pectin (15). The diameter of individual cellulose microfibrils is variable. Electron microsc0py of negatively stained cellulose has shown that the individual microfibrils are made up of smaller, highly crystalline fibers having an average diameter of 35 A (16). The arrangement of micro- fibrils in the polysaccharide matrix gives the cell wall the same increase in strength as seen in filament-wound reinforced plastic (17). The size of cellulose molecules isolated from primary and secondary walls differ. Primary wall cellulose in cotton balls has a nonuniform degree of polymerization of between 2,000 and 6,000 while secondary wall cellulose has a uniform degree of polymerization of 14,000 (M.W.=2.3 x 106) (18). Max- Figini has stated that there must be two different mechanisms of cellulose synthesis to account for the formation of these two cellulose species and that the uniform size of secondary wall cellulose suggests a template mechanism of synthesis (18). Albersheim and co-workers have used chemical and enzymatic methods to degrade the extracellular and cell wall polysacchrides of suspension cultured sycamore cells (19, 20, 21). Characterization of the fragments obtained from cell wall degradation allowed these investigators to postulate that the primary cell wall contained 4 major components (21). The first component consisted of elementary fibrils of cellulose; hydrogen bonded together to form microfibrils. The second com- ponent was a 8-1, 4-glucan with side chains of xylose and fucosyl-galactose. The third component was a pectin con- sisting of a backbone of rhamnogalacturonan with side chains of arabinan and 4-linked galactan. The fourth component was a hydroxyproline-rich protein with arabinosyl tetrasacchride and 3, 6-1inked galactan attached, respectively, to the hydroxyproline and serine residues of the protein. Albersheim and co- workers have also postulated the following arrangement for these four components in the primary wall (21). Xyloglucan is hydrogen bonded to the cellulose fibrils. This is a very tight bond because of the large number of available hydrogen-bonding sites and there is enough xyloglucan available in the wall to encapsulate all the cellulose fibrils in a monolayer of xyloglucan (20). The reducing ends of the xyloglucans are covalently bound to the galactan side chains of the pectin. The 3, 6-linked arabinogalactan side chains of the protein are in turn covalently bound to the pectin backbone. This tenative model of the primary wall indicates that all the components of the wall are tightly bound to form a single macromolecule. As Kleegstra gt 31. have suggested, this model leads to interesting speculation‘ about the mechanism of cell wall extension although other structural models for the primary wall could be derived from their data (21). Xyloglucans in cell suspension cultures of red kidney beans have been shown to have a nearly identical structure to the sycamore cell xylo- glucan (22). Morphology of Cell Wall Synthesis Role of the Golgi Apparatus The involvement of the golgi apparatus in plant cell wall synthesis can be deduced from electron micro- graphic studies of cell plate formation during cell division. The cell plate is formed by the fusion of small vesicles (23). These vesicles are derived from the golgi apparatus and their movement to the area of plate formation seems to be directed by microtubules (24, 25). Membranes from the coalescing vesicles con- stitute the plasmalemma of the new cell surface (26). Further confirmation for the role of the golgo apparatus was obtained by autoradiographic studies. When intact root cells from wheat were soaked in a solution of [3H]glucose for 5 min by Northcote and Pickett-Heaps the radioactivity in the cells was found to be localized in the cisternae of the golgi apparatus (27). Further treatment of the root cells for a short period with nonradioactive glucose caused the 10 radioactivity originally present in the golgi apparatus to be transferred to the golgi associated vesicles in the cytoplasm (27). Longer periods with nonradioactive glucose resulted in the localization of the radioactivity in the cell wall and slime layer (27). Similar auto- radiographic evidence for the involvement of the golgi apparatus in cell wall synthesis was also obtained with sycamore seedlings (28). Homogenization and fractionation of cells pre- viously incubated with radioactive glucose have also shown that the resulting radioactive polysacchrides were localized in the golgi apparatus (29, 30, 27). The radioactive polysacchrides were identified as pectins and hemicelluloses (29, 30, 27). The absence of radioactivity in cellulose suggests that the golgi apparatus is not the site of synthesis for this glucan. I have previously cited data from the analysis of woody tissue (15) which stated that the secondary wall formed during cell dif- ferentiation did not contain pectin. However, in a fractionation experiment with differentiating maize cells soaked in radioactive glucose, radioactive pectin was found in the golgi apparatus (29). This indicates that some pectin is synthesized during synthesis of the secondary cell wall. Golgi apparatus were also the site of pectin synthesis in the elongation of Lilium longiflorum pollen tubes (31). Although the previously 11 discussed data all support the theory that the golgi apparatus is the site for synthesis of the plant cell wall matrix polysacchrides there have been other organelles proposed. For instance, Villemez‘gg'gl. have used centrifugal fractionation to isolate the particles reaponsible for in vitro synthesis of a variety of poly- sacchrides in onion (32). Their data led them to state that the organelle reSponsible for polysacchride synthesis was of very large size and was most probably the plasma membrane. The location of the polysaccharide synthesizing system in the golgi apparatus leads to a speculative theory about the control mechanism for cell wall synthesis at different stages of cell growth and differentiation. Northcote has postulated that since many of the enzymes responsible for the interconversion of sugars are membrane bound they may be contained in the golgi apparatus (33). Therefore, the golgi apparatus could control the type of polysacchride synthesized by controlling the synthesis of the appropriate precursors (33). Experimental evidence for this theory is not well documented although the appearance of UDP-glucose-4-epimerase activity in the green alga Acetabularia mediterranea is correlated with the development of the galactose-containing cap of this organism (34). 12 Orientation of Cellulose MicrofibriIs The organelle responsible for cellulose synthesis and the mechanism for orientation of the microfibrils in the wall are not clearly understood. Microtubules are thought to have a role in cell wall and microfibril syn- thesis. In secondary thickening microtubules with the same orientation as the neighboring cellulose microfibrils are found adjacent to the cell wall (35, 36). This observation suggests that microtubules control the orien- tation of the microfibrils either by being the site of cellulose synthesis or by directing the matrix poly- sacchrides into the wall and thus directing the orien- tation of the developing microfibrils (36, 33). Another organelle thought to be involved in the synthesis of cellulose microfibrils is a particle found attached to the plasmalemma. The 60 to 150 2 particle is clearly seen sculptured to the plasmalemma of freeze- etched yeast cells (37). Electron micrographs obtained by Moor and Muhlethaler indicated that the particles formed hexagonal arrangements on the plasmalemma and were penetrated by short fibrils, believed to be cellu- lose, which disappeared into the inner layer of the cell wall (38). In some cases the particles formed rows that have the same orientation as the adjacent microfibrils in the wall (39). These particles are presently thought to be the actual site of cellulose synthesis (33). 13 Although previously described data indicated that the golgi apparatus is not involved in cellulose synthesis, there is an important exception. The marine alga Pleurochrysis sherffelii has a cell wall composed of scales containing cellulose. An electron micrographic study of this alga show that the scale is completely synthesized in the organism's single golgi apparatus and then transported through the cytoplasm and deposited outside the cell by golgi derived vesicles (40). There- fore, in this organism cellulose is synthesized inside the golgi apparatus. Biosynthesis of Cell Wall Polysacchrides £2.21EE2 sugar nucleotides are the substrates for the enzymes synthesizing plant cell wall polysac- chrides. The energy required to form a glycosidic bond requires that the monosacchrides be activated prior to incorporation into polysacchride (41). Nucleoside diphosphate sugars are excellent donors of sugars because of their high negative free energy of hydrolysis (AG°). UDPGlc, for instance, has a AG° of hydrolysis equal to -7.600 kilocalories (41). Synthesis of Glucans The polysaccharide whose in vitro biosynthesis has been studied in the greatest detail is the B-l,4- 14 glucan, cellulose. Research in this area is often contradictory and is complicated by the fact that under certain conditions a B-l,3-glucan is also synthesized by particulate enzyme preparations. In 1958 Feingold EE.E£° first reported that particulate enzyme preparations from Phaseolus aureus (mung bean) could incorporate radioactivity from UDP— 14ClGlc into a polysaccharide identified by partial [U- acid hydrolysis as B-l,3-glucan (42). The B-l,3-glucan in plants is given the common name callose, but it is not a normal constituent of the plant cell wall (43). How- ever, the synthesis of callose is known to be an impor- tant response to cell wounding and callose is a major component of sieve plates and pollen tubes (43). Although the synthesis of B-l,4-glucan from UDPGlc was not observed by Feingold £5 31. in g. aureus other researchers using approximately the same techniques have reported the simultaneous production of B-l,3- and B-l,4-glucan with particulate enzyme preparations from g. aureus and Lupinus 21223 (42, 44, 45). After publi- cation of these conflicting experiments Hassid and co- workers undertook a careful study of the g. aureus and L. 21225 systems and announced that only B—l,3-glucan was synthesized from UDPGlc (46). To heighten the uncertainty of the identity of the UDPGlc product from E. aureus it should be noted that one of the original 15 reports identifying B-l,4-glucan as a product of UDPGlc came from Hassid's laboratory (44). A partial explanation for the discrepancy in the identity of the product syn- thesized from UDPGlc with a. aureus particulate enzyme preparations was proposed by Clark and Villemez. They reported once again that this enzyme preparation could synthesize a mixture of B-l,3- and B-l,4-glucans from UDPGlc but that the relative amounts of the two glucans produced was dependent on the temperature used to germi- nate the a. aureus seedlings (47). Although they could not explain why other researchers were unable to find evidence of B-l,4-glucan synthesis they felt that this may be the result of subtle differences in methods of enzyme preparation (47). In contrast to the g. aureus system, the ability of particulate enzyme preparations from.A!gna sativa (oat) seedlings to synthesize B-l,3- and B-l,4-glucans from UDPGlc is well documented (48, 49). The concen- tration of UDPGlc in the reaction mixture determined whether production of B-l,3- or B-l,4-glucan predomi- nated (49). The particulate enzyme preparation had 5 5 M for the UDPGlc Km's of 1.1 x 10’ M and 6 x 10" synthesis of B-l,4- and B-l,3-g1ucan, respectively (49). Particulate enzyme homogenates from wheat seedlings and Lilium multiflorum endosperm also exhibit a UDPGlc 16 concentration dependent synthesis of B-l,3- and B-l,4- glucans (50, 51). Separate enzyme systems seem to be responsible for the synthesis of B-l,3- and B-l,4-glucans. Tsai and Hassid have "solubilized" the two activities by digitonin extraction and separated them from one another by absorption on hydroxylapatite gel and elution with phosphate buffer (51). Studies seeking to identify the organelles responsible for B-l,3- and B-l,4-glucan synthesis have provided additional evidence for the existence of separate enzyme systems. Ray gt_al. have used a combination of velocity and isopycnic density gradient centrifugation to isolate the enzymatic particle in pea seedling homogenates which are responsible for the synthesis of B-l,4-glucans from UDPGlc and GDPGlc (52). Electron micrographs showed that the isolated fraction with glucan synthetase activity contained condensed golgi dictyosomes and free dictyosomal membranes (52). An elegant study by Morré and co-workers showed that two organelles were responsible for glucan synthesis in onion stem: plasma membrane and golgi apparatus (53). Both of these organelles were able to synthesize B-l,3- and B-l,4-glucans but at 1.5 uM UDPGlc concentration the majority of the B-l,4- glucan synthesis occurred in the golgi dictyosome fraction and at 1 mM UDPGlc concentration the majority 17 of the B-l,3-glucan synthesis occurred in the plasma membrane fraction (53). The discoveries by Morré and Ray that golgi membranes could synthesize B-l,4-glucan from UDPGlc seems to conflict with the previously discussed data on the absence of in 3133 cellulose synthesis in golgi apparatus (29, 30, 27). Morré has stated that B-l,4- glucan synthesis in his golgi preparations may be part of a synthesis system for glyc0proteins or hemicellulose polysaccharides (53). It is also possible that the golgi apparatus contained inactive cellulose synthesizing enzymes prior to their transport to the plasmalemma and the isolation of the golgi caused activation of these enzymes (53). Plant particulate enzyme preparations can also use GDPGlc to synthesize glucans. A particulate enzyme preparation from P. aureus could incorporate D-glucose from GDPGlc into a polysaccharide component (54, 55). The polysaccharide was identified as cellulose since it released a series of B-l,4-glucan oligosaccharides after partial acid hydrolysis (55). The absolute identity of this material as cellulose, however, is unclear because the incorporation of D-glucose from GDPGlc in a. aureus was affected by the addition of GDPMan to the reaction mixture (56, 57). D-Mannose and D-glucose were both incorporated into an alkali insoluble material and 18 enzymatic degradation and acetolysis have shown that the material was a B-l,4-glucomannan (56). Addition of GDPMan to a reaction mixture containing GDP[U-14C]Glc and a particulate enzyme preparation from E. aureus did not affect the rate of D-[U-14C]glucose incorporation but did increase the total amount of incorporation (56, 58). The increase in total D-glucose incorporation as the result of the presence of GDPMan is believed to be caused by the synthesis of additional D-mannose-containing D-glucose acceptor. Addition of GDPGlc to a reaction mixture containing GDP[U-14C]Man and the particulate enzyme preparation caused an increase in the rate of incorporation of D-[U-14C1mannose and a decrease in the total amount of D-[U-14C]mannose incorporated (58). It should be noted that in order to measure the initial rate of D-glucose and D-mannose incorporation the reaction mixture was extracted with lipid solvents in order to remove glycoproteins that were also synthesized (58). Synthesis of B-l,4-glucans with GDPGlc has also been reported with particulate enzyme preparations from £3 §123§_and pea seedlings (51, 52). The L, glbgg preparation also contained UDPGlc-Z-epimerase activity and D-mannose was incorporated from the resulting GDPMan (52). In the case of a. aureus Villemez has stated that GDPGlc is the substrate for the synthesis of a gluco- mannan rather than cellulose (58). 19 The role of UDPGlc and GDPGlc in cellulose syn- thesis was also studied in cotton. Barber and Hassid reported that a particulate enzyme preparation prepared from 4- to 8-day-old cotton balls could synthesize cellu— lose from GDPGlc and the extent of D-glucose incorporation was stimulated by the presence of GDPMan (59). Enzyme prepared from older balls was inactive (59). As pre- viously mentioned it has been proposed that cellulose in the primary and secondary walls is synthesized by dif- ferent mechanisms (18). Marx-Figini, in interpreting Barber's and Hassid's experiment, felt that the 8-1, 4-glucan synthesized from GDPGlc in cotton represented synthesis of primary wall cellulose (60). He stated that Barber and Hassid were probably unable to synthesize secondary cell wall cellulose in their enzyme preparation because the isolation of the enzyme would have destroyed the template mechanism necessary for synthesis of homo- logous secondary wall cellulose (18, 60). Later work by Delmer and Beasley with intact isolated cotton fibers showed that at the stage of growth when primary wall is produced the fibers incorporated D-glucose from GDPGlc into alkali insoluble glucan (61). As the fibers aged formation of the primary wall ceased and secondary wall synthesis began (61). During this same time period the fibers lost the ability to synthesize glucan from GDPGlc but gained the ability to synthesize glucolipids from 20 UDPGlc (61). Delmer and Beasley explained these results by suggesting that in cotton GDPGlc is used for synthesis of cellulose only in the primary wall (61). This theory leads to interesting speculation about the control of cellulose synthesis, but must be tempered by the knowledge that the identity of the B-l,4-glucans synthesized from UDPGlc and GDPGlc as cellulose in both the P. aureus and cotton systems is not positive. In fact, x-ray diffraction studies of glucans synthesized ig_!i££g with a particulate enzyme preparation from g. aureus suggested that only low molecular weight oligosaccharides were synthesized from UDPGlc and GDPGlc (62). The bacterium Acetobacterium xylinum can synthe- size fibrils of B-l,4-glucan which are identical in structure to the cellulose fibrils found in plants (63). Fibrils are formed extracellularly and since they are easily isolated, cellulose synthesis in A. xylinum has been extensively studied (63, 64). Intact cells will 14C]glucose into incorporate radioactivity from D-[U- cellulose (65). Cell-free homogenates obtained from A, xylinum.were able to synthesize cellulose fibrils when supplied with D-glucose and ATP. Later work with cell-free homogenate prepared by sonication showed that UDPGlc was a precursor of cellulose of A. xylinum synthesis (66). 21 Synthesis of Matrix Poly- saccharides A variety of researchers have investigated the ability of particulate enzyme preparations from different plants to incorporate monosaccharides from sugar nucleo- tides into suspected cell wall matrix polysaccharides. Although many different sugars have been investigated, little success has occurred beyond announcements that particular enzyme activities have been discovered. The inability of researchers to go beyond this point and to investigate the mechanism of cell wall polysaccharide synthesis attests to the complexity of this system. Incubation of a particulate enzyme preparation 14ClGlcUA resulted in from immature corn cobs with UDP[U- the incorporation of radioactivity into a water-insoluble fraction (67). Extraction of the insoluble material with ammonium oxalate and alkali showed that the radioactivity was incorporated into both pectin and hemicellulose poly- saccharides (67). Hydrolysis of the fractions followed by paper chromatography of the hydrolysates showed that the radioactivity was contained in D-xylose, L-arabinose, glucurono-galactose, glucurono-xylose, D-galacturonic acid, and D-glucuronic acid with the majority of the radioactivity contained in D-xylose (67). The particulate enzyme preparations must have contained UDPGlcUA carboxy- 1yase (EC, 4.1.1.35), UDPGlCUA-4-epimerase (EC, 5.1.3.6), 22 and UDPAra-4-epimerase (EC, 4.1.3.5) activities to account for the presence of these radioactive sugars in the poly- saccharides. The D-galactose residue in glucurono- galactose was not radioactive (67). Therefore, D-galactose must have been incorporated into the acceptor molecule prior to the preparation of the particulate enzyme. As described previously the D-glucuronic acid residues in hemicellulose polysaccharides are often methylated (5). Methylation occurs by the enzymatic transfer of methyl groups from S-adenosyl-L-methionine to the glucuronic residues of previously synthesized hemi- cellulose (68). Incorporation of D-xylose and L-arabinose from their respective uridine sugar nucleotides into hemi- cellulose was demonstrated with particulate enzyme prepar- ations from immature corn cobs and £23 gays seedlings (69, 70). The product was soluble in alkali and identification of the oligosaccharides obtained after partial acid hydrolysis showed that the product consisted of a D-xylan backbone with L-arabinose side chains (69, 70). Another matrix polysaccharide synthesized with g. aureus seedling particulate enzyme was D-galactan. The substrate was UDPgalactose and the resulting water soluble polysaccharide had a molecular weight greater than 4,600 (70). 23 Particulate enzyme preparations from g. aureus and tomatoe could synthesize polygalacturonic acid when supplied with UDPGalUA (72, 73). Since UDP-methylgalac- turonic acid will not function in this synthesis, it is assumed that methylation of D-galacturonic acid occurs after synthesis of the polysaccharide (72). The enzymatic introduction of methyl ester groups into pectin was demonstrated in P, aureus with S-adenosyl-L-methionine as the substrate (74). Methylation occurred with endo- genous pectin but not with exogenous pectin that was present in the reaction mixture (75). This suggests that the location of the esterification system is within a membrane-bound organelle. Studies by Kauss g£_gl, have shown that pectin methyl esterase when added to the par- ticulate enzyme preparation would not degrade methyl- esterified pectin synthesized in vitro unless the lipid membrane of the particulate enzyme was disrupted by treatment with detergent or phospholipase A (73). The structure of radioactive polygalacturonic acid synthesized from UDP[14CIGalUA was investigated by enzymatic degradation with exopolygalacturonate transeli- minase (76). This enzyme degrades polygalacturonic acid from the reducing end (77). When the product synthesized in 11352 was treated with this enzyme, radioactivity was released solely as unsaturated digalacturonic acid (76). The amount of unsaturated digalacturonic acid released 24 was proportional to length of treatment (76). Since syn- thesis of polysaccharides by glycosylation occurs from the nonreducing end, the results of the transeliminase treat- ment indicate that the polygalacturonic acid was labelled throughout the chain and incorporation of galacturonic acid did not occur by the addition of a few residues to the ends of preformed chains. gossible Role of Lipid Intermediate The role of polyisoprenol sugar intermediates in the synthesis of components of the bacterial cell wall is well established (78). The possibility that similar lipid intermediates may function in plant cell wall syn- thesis has been investigated by several research groups. Cell-free preparations from A, xylinum incor- porated radioactivity from UDP[14CJGlc into lipid material (79). Radioactive sugar was released from this material by treatment in 0.01 N H2804 at 100°C or in 0.1 N LiOH at room temperature (79). The radioactive products released from the glycolipid were identified as glucose, cellobiose, and possibly other higher intermediates (79). This suggests that in this organism a polyprenoidpyrophosphate may be an inter- mediate in cellulose synthesis. Jung and Tanner have shown that the synthesis of yeast "mannan" from GDPMan proceeds through the high 25 energy lipid intermediate, dolichol monophosphate mannoside (80). The identity of the lipid as dolichol was verified by mass spectroscopy (80). Yeast "mannan“ proved to be a heterogeneous glycoprotein and the manno- lipid acted only to transfer a mannosyl residue to the protein (81). The rest of the mannose residues were added directly to the mannan from GDPMan without the intervention of dolichol monophosphate (81). Several researchers have demonstrated the existence of dolichol isoprenoid compounds in higher plants. Both Kauss and Villemez have isolated a mannosyl lipid from a reaction mixture containing particulate enzyme preparation from A. aureus and GDP[U-14C]Man (82, 83). The lipid was tentatively identified as an iso- prenoid by a preliminary mass spectral analysis and the fact that $2.!izg studies showed that the lipid was syn- thesized from 5-[3Hl-DL-mevalonic acid (82, 84). The mannosyl lipid had a high transfer potential as evidenced by the fact that the sugar was released by acid hydrolysis at pH 2 (84). In addition, the incorporation of mannose into lipid could be reversed by addition of GDP but not GMP to the reaction mixture (84). Villemez, when studying the synthesis of the mannosyl lipid from GDPMan, isolated a low molecular weight membrane-bound protein from E, aureus which contained D-mannose oligosaccharides (84). A similar glyc0protein was also isolated when 26 the particulate homogenate was incubated with GDPIU-14C1- Glc (84). He postulated that this glyc0protein may also be an intermediate in cell wall polysaccharide synthesis and could obviate the need for a primer polysaccharide (34). Storm and Hassid were unable to demonstrate the transfer of D-mannose from endogenous mannosyl lipid to polysaccharide in A. aureus particulate enzyme prepar- ations (85). This experiment indicated that the mannosyl lipid is not an intermediate in cell wall polysaccharide synthesis. Particulate enzyme preparations from g. aureus did transfer D-mannose from GDPMan to the exogenous lipids phytol phosphate, phytanol phOSphate, dolichol monophos- phate, and betulaprenol phosphate (86, 87). Since addition of these exogenous lipids allow for the syn- thesis of larger quantities of glycolipids, it is hoped that this will help in elucidating the possible role of glycosyl isoprenoids in plant cell wall synthesis. Particulate enzyme preparations from cotton fibers have also shown evidence of containing lipid intermediates. Radioactive D-glucose and D-mannose were incorporated into an acid lipid fraction when UDPGlc and GDPMan, respectively, were incubated with particulate enzyme (88). The synthesis of the glycosyl lipids was reversed by the addition of UDP and GDP to the reaction mixture (88). Isolated glycosyl lipids were labile to 27 acid hydrolysis at pH 2 (88). The free lipid chromato- graphed with an Rf similar to ficoprenyl phosphate and the natural acceptor in the particulate enzyme preparation could be replaced by ficoprenyl phosphate (88). Solubilizatigngf Polysaccharide SyntheSiEing System The inability of researchers to solubilize the plant cell wall polysaccharide synthesizing systems has hampered research efforts in understanding the mechanism of this complex process. The partial "solubilization" of the UDPGlc and GDPGlc dependent glucan synthesizing activities in g. aureus, A. sativa, and A. ElRE§.bY extraction with digitonin has been reported (89, 57, 90). However, the procedure does not result in complete solubilization and there are still particles contained in the "solubilized" supernatant (89). Digitonin, therefore, probably did not cause a true release of particulate enzyme from membrane complexes. Heller and Villemez have reported the solubilization of the glucomannan synthe- sizing system in E. aureus by the use of Triton X-100 extraction (91). The solubilized enzyme activity could transfer sugar moieties from GDPGlc and GDPMan to suspected polysaccharides, but could not use UDPGlc, UDPGal, UDPXyl, UDPArab, or UDPGlcUA (91). Solubili- zation with Triton x-100 resulted in a 3.5 increase in the specific activity of the GDPMan activity and the 28 activity remained in solution after centrifugation at 300,000 x g for 40 min (91). The Trition solubilized activity was not purified further. D-Apiose Chemistry In 1901 Vongerichten discovered that apiin, a flavonoid glycoside found in parsley, contained a pre- viously unknown pentose sugar which he named apiose (92). Vongerichten later reported that apiose has a branched chain structure (118). The structure of the naturally occurring apiose was finally elucidated as 3-C-hydroxy- methyl-aldehydo-D-glycero-tetrose (94). The Fisher (I) and Haworth (II) structures of D-apiose are shown. Structure II is one of 4 possible cyclic isomers of D-apiose. A detailed description of the chemistry of D-apiose is found elsewhere (95). Occurrence in Nature The first example of the occurrence of D-apiose in compounds other than a flavonoid glycoside was reported by Bell EE.21° These results suggested that D-apiose was a constituent of the polysaccharide fraction of the marine alga Posidonia australis (96). Besides A. australis the following plants have also been shown to possess polysaccharides containing D-apiose: Zostera marina (97, 98, 99), Lemna gibba 29 (100), A. nana (101), A. pacifica and Phyllospadix (98), and A. 91225 (101). All reports on the occurrence of D-apiose in nature have been limited to members of the plant kingdom. However, D-apiose is a common constituent of plants. Duff has surveyed 175 plants and found that D-apiose was contained in the acid hydrolysates of at least 60% of the plants tested (101). According to Duff, one of the plants with the highest content of D-apiose was A. AAAQE (duckweed) (101). D-apiose was localized in the cell wall of A. AAAQA (101). Identification of Apiogalac- turonans in L. minor Beck (102) and Hart and Kindel (103) extracted cell wall material from A. 31225 with ammonium oxalate and isolated a family of polysaccharides containing D-apiose and D-galacturonic acid. Both groups were able to further fractionate the polysaccharides after ammonium oxalate extraction. Beck isolated two fractions con- taining D-apiose and D-galacturonic acid, one of which also contained D-xylose and D-galactose (103). Hart and Kindel used a combination of NaCl fractionation and DEAE-Sephadex chromatography to fractionate their material into a series of polysaccharides containing D-apiose and D-galacturonic acid (102). The content of D-apiose in these polysaccharides varied from 7.9 30 to 38.1% by weight (102). The fractions were reported to contain only D-apiose and D-galacturonic acid although the techniques used by these workers were specific only for these two sugars (102). Hart and Kindel did report, however, that in analyzing the D-apiose content of the polysaccharides one and sometimes two faint spots not corresponding to D-apiose were found when the acid hydrolysate of the polysaccharide fractions were chroma- tographed on paper (102). The identities of these spots were not investigated. The following information on the isolation and partial characterization of the polysaccharides containing D-apiose isolated from A. 21225 was obtained from Hart and Kindel (102). When they extracted cell wall prepar- ations from A. AAAQE_with 0.5% ammonium oxalate, 14% of the wall material was solubilized. This solubilized material contained 20% of the D-apiose originally present in the cell wall. After fractionation of the solubilized material, all the polysaccharides isolated were of the same general type: D-galacturonans with side chains of D-apiobiose. The sensitivity of the apiogalacturonans to pectinase degradation was found to be dependent on the D-apiose content of the polysaccharides. Those apiogalac- turonans of low D—apiose content and insoluble in l M NaCl were degraded by pectinase, while those of high D-apiose content and soluble in l M NaCl were not 31 degraded. Resistant apiogalacturonans could be degraded by pectinase if the D-apiobiose side chains were first removed from the polysaccharide by mild acid hydrolysis. Formaldehyde release after periodate oxidation of apio- galacturonans showed that about 50% of the D-apiose molecules were substituted at either the 3 or 3' position. Mild acid hydrolysis of the ammonium oxalate extracted material resulted in the release of a disac- charide from the polysaccharide which was identified as apiobiose (III) (104). Purified apiogalacturonan fraction IIa (as defined by Hart and Kindel [102]) was used to study the release of apiose from apiogalacturonan. Hydrolysis of fraction IIa at pH 4 for 3 hr at 100°C resulted in near total release of the D-apiose in the polysaccharide as apiobiose (104). The rate of D-apiose release from polysaccharide was pH dependent. The rate declined steadily from pH 3.5 to almost zero at pH 6.5 (104). These results led Hart and Kindel to propose that the structure of apiogalacturonans (IV) in A. AAAQE con- sisted of a backbone of a-l, 4-linked polygalacturonic acid with side chains of apiobiose (102, 104). UDPAEi D-apiose is synthesized enzymatically in plants by the conversion of UDPGlcUA to UDPApi and CO (105, 2 106). The enzyme responsible for this reaction has been 32 H O \ // H-C-OH HOH C-C-OH 2 l CHZOH OH OH (I) (II) D—apiose D—apiosylfuranose (III) apiobiose Api Api Api l I l Api Api Api l I -Ga1UA-GalUA-GalUA-GalUA-GalUA—Ga1UA-GalUA- (IV) apiogalacturonan List of structures. The dotted lines indicate undetermined stereochemistry. 33 partially purified from A. EABQE and has been given the common names UDPGlcUA cyclase and D-apiose synthetase (93, 107, 108). UDPApi was found to be an extremely labile compound as demonstrated by its half-life of 97.2 min when stored at pH 8.0 and 25°C (106). However, under proper conditions UDPApi can be stored for long periods of time. When stored at pH 6.4 and -20°C 94% of the UDPApi was still intact after 120 days (108). In Vitro Synthesis of Apio- galacturonans 32.21332 synthesis of apiogalacturonans in A. Eiflgi should, for a number of reasons, be an excellent system for studying cell wall polysaccharide synthesis. 1. Apiogalacturonans are presumably of physiological significance because of the large quantity con- tained in the cell wall of A. minor. 2. Because of the large quantities of apiogalac- turonan in A. minor cell walls the apiogalac- turonan synthesizing system should be easy to detect. 3. We can compare the structure of authentic apio- galacturonans with AA vitro synthesized D-apiose containing compounds. 4. Procedures for characterizing apiogalacturonans are already developed. 34 5. Apiogalacturonans can be solubilized by rela- tively mild treatment. From previous discussion of the mechanism of cell wall polysaccharides synthesis one would expect that sugar nucleotides containing D-apiose and D-galacturonic acid would be the precursors of apiogalacturonan. Kindel has reported that radioactivity from UDP[14CJApi was incorporated into material insoluble in water and methanol when the sugar nucleotide was incubated with a particulate enzyme preparation from A. EEBQE (109). This material was solubilized when extracted with 0.5% ammonium oxalate (109). Although UDP[14C]Xyl was also present in the reaction mixture, Kindel did not observe D-[U-14CIXyl incorporated into the methanol and water insoluble material (109). Hydrolysis of the material l4C]apiobiose side at pH 4 resulted in the release of [U- chains thus suggesting that D-[U-14C]apiose was incor- porated into apiogalacturonans or a compound of similar structure (107). The incorporation of D-apiose with the particulate enzyme preparation from A. AAAQE has been further investi- gated by Pan and Kindel (110 and unpublished results). They found that the enzyme responsible for the transfer of D-apiose from UDPApi has a Km of 4.9 uM and maximal activity at pH 5.7. They have also found that the particulate enzyme preparation from A. minor could 35 l 1 transfer D-[U- 4Cl-xylose from UDP[U- 4C]Xyl to a methanol and water insoluble material. This activity has a Km of 12.7 uM and maximal activity at pH 5.7. Leinbach and Kindel have found that particulate enzyme preparation 14C]galacturonic from A. minor can also incorporate D-[U- acid from UDP[U-14C1GalUA into a methanol and water insoluble material (119). This activity exhibited a Km of 8 uM and maximal activity at pH 6.2. EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES Materials DEAE-Sephadex A-25 (particle size 40-120 u, capacity: 3.5 1 0.5 mequivalents/g) was purchased from Pharmacia Fine Chemicals. Bio-Gel P-30 (100-200 mesh), Bio-Gel P-100 (50-150 mesh), and Bio-Gel P-300 (50-100 mesh) were obtained from Bio-Rad Laboratories. UDPXyl and UTP were purchased from Schwarz/Mann and P-L Bio- chemicals, respectively. UDPGlcUA, UDPGalUA, and fungal pectinase were purchased from Sigma Chemical Co. The pectinase was partially purified by the manufacturer who stated it still contained several other enzymes. UDP- [U-14C]GlcUA (190 mCi/mmole), UDP[U-14C]Xyl (156 mCi/ 14C]galactose-l-P (214 mCi/mmole) were obtained from New England Nuclear Corp. UDP[U-14C1GalUA mmole), and D-[U- was synthesized from D-[U-14C]galactose-l-P and UTP by the method of Feingold SE 21' (59). D-Apiose, apiobiose, 14C]22° sodium chloride soluble apiogalac- 1 D-apiitol, [ turonan fraction, [ 4C]60° sodium chloride soluble apio- galacturonan fraction and 22° sodium chloride insoluble apiogalacturonan fraction were prepared by Hart and 36 37 Kindel (102, 104). The specific activity of the [14C] apiogalacturonan fractions ranged from 14,000 to 16,000 dpm per mg. UDP[U-14C1Api was enzymatically synthesized from UDP[U-14C]GlcUA (108, Pan and Kindel, unpublished experi- ments). From the data of 11 individual preparations of UDP[U-14C1Api, the percent of the total radioactivity in 1 the final solution present in UDP[U- 4C]Api, UDP[U-14C1Xy1, and UDP[U-14C]GlcUA ranged from 61 to 72, 24 to 40, and 1 0 to 8%, respectively. UDP[U- 4C]Xyl was simultaneously 14C]Api because of the presence synthesized with UDP[U- of UDPGlcUA carboxy-lyase I activity in the UDPGlcUA cyclase preparations. The mixture of the three radio- active sugar nucleotides will be referred to as "UDP- [U-14C]Api." In the present paper, values of radio- activity and sugar nucleotide content reported for "UDP[U-14C]Api" are the sum of the total amounts con- tained in UDP[U-14C]Api, UDP[U-14CJXy1, and UDP[U-14C]- 1 GlcUA. UDP[U- 4C]Api solution was stored frozen at -90°C. General Methods Radioactivity was detected on paper chromatograms with a Packard radiochromatogram scanner, model 7201 (Packard Instrument Co. Inc.). All other radioactivity measurements were made with a Packard Tri-Carb liquid- scintillation counter, model 3310, with one of the following scintillation solutions: (A) Bray's solution 38 (111); (B) 5.5 g 2,5-diphenyloxazole and 0.1 g 1,4-bis [2-(4-methyl-5-phenyloxazolyl)]-benzene in 667 ml of reagent grade toluene and 333 ml of Triton X-100; (C) 4.0 g 2,5-bis-2-(5-tert-butylbenzoxazolyl)-thiophene in 1 liter of reagent grade toluene. Aqueous solutions of radioactive material (1.0 to 1.5 ml) were counted in 10 m1 of scintillation solution A or B. Radioactive compounds on paper were counted directly by complete immersion of the paper in scintillation solution C. The counting effeciencies with scintillation solutions A, B, and C were 77, 81, and 63%, respectively. Solutions were concentrated under reduced pressure by rotary evaporation at temperatures below 30°C. Gel chromatography was performed with columns prepared as recommended by the manufacturer; elution was performed at room temperature with descending flow. Dialysis was performed with tubing that had been freshly prepared by heating 30 min at 100°C. Means and mean deviation were reported for experimental values based on more than one determination. Culture of L. Minor A. minor was grown as described by Kindel and Watson (108). The plants used in the preparation of the particulate enzyme preparation were grown on 4 liters of inorganic medium in small plastic pans (29 x 33 cm). 39 After the fronds had multiplied to the point of covering the surface of the medium (18 to 22 days) A. minor were removed as needed. Paper Chromatography Descending paper chromatography was used and was performed with washed Whatmann No. 3MM paper. Washing was done with 0.1 M citric acid followed by water. Chromatography was performed at 22°C and the following solvents were used: (A) ethyl acetate - H20 - acetic acid - formic acid (18:4:3:l, by vol), (B) n-propanol - ethyl acetate - H O (85:10:5, by vol), (C) isopropanol - 2 H 0 (9:1, v/v), (D) H O saturated butanol, (E) ethyl 2 2 acetate - acetic acid - pyridine - H O (5:1:5:3, by vol). 2 Nonradioactive sugars were detected on chromatograms by spraying with aniline hydrogen pthalate (112) or by using the AgNO dip method (113). 3 DEAE-Sephadex Column Chromatography Columns of defined DEAE-Sephadex A-25 were treated with 3 bed volumes of 0.05 M phosphate buffer, pH 7.7, before the sample was applied. Samples were dialyzed in 0.05 M sodium phosphate buffer, pH 7.7, for 2 hr with one buffer change midway through the dialysis, before being applied to the column. The rate of sample application was equal to the rate used to operate the column. After the sample was applied the column was 40 treated with additional buffer followed by a step gradient of 0.1 to 0.3 M NaCl in 0.05 M sodium phOSphate buffer, pH 7.7. Except for Figure 10 the salt gradient described on the figures indicates the first column fraction that each step of the gradient was applied. The column was operated at 4°C. Isolation of Particulate Enzyme Preparation A. miggg_was collected on 4 layers of cheese- cloth, washed thoroughly with distilled water, freed of excess water with absorbent paper, and weighed. The remaining steps were performed at 4°C. The fronds were ground to a smooth consistency (for l to 2 min) with a mortar and pestle in 0.05 M sodium phosphate buffer, pH 7.3, containing 1% BSA (wt/vol) and 1 mM MgC12. Two ml of buffer were used for every 1 g wet weight of plant material. The resulting homogenate was filtered through 4 layers of cheesecloth and the filtrate was centrifuged for 10 min at 480 g. The precipitate was discarded and the supernatant solution was centrifuged for 8 min at 34,800 g. The supernatant solution was discarded and the precipitate was gently resuspended in 0.1 M sodium phosphate buffer, pH 6.0, containing 1% BSA (wt/vol) and 10% sucrose (wt/vol) with a Ten Broeck glass homogenizer. For every 10g wet weight of A. minor used, 0.5 ml of the buffer was used for resuspension. 41 This was called the particulate enzyme preparation. The final pH of the particulate enzyme preparation was 6.1. Biosynthesis of Radioactive Product and SqubIliz d Product Radioactive product which was insoluble in l4C]Api," methanol and water was formed when "UDP[U- UDP[U-14C]GalUA, UDP[U-14C]GlcUA, or UDP[U-14C]Xy1 was incubated with particulate enzyme preparation. A reaction mixture was prepared which contained 50 ul of particulate enzyme preparation and either 0.17 or 0.33 nmoles "UDP[U-14C]Api" (60,000 to 120,000 dpm), 0.05 to 0.10 nmole of UDP[U-14C]GalUA (25,000 to 36,000 dpm), 0.1 to 0.3 nmole of UDP[U-14C]G1CUA(55,000 to 124,000 dpm) or 0.08 nmole of UDP[U-14C1Xyl (91,200 dpm). Eleven different preparations of "UDP[14C]Api" were used in the experiments reported in the present paper. The propor- tions of the three sugar nucleotides present in the l4C]Api" were stated earlier in this solutions of "UDP[U- section. In specified experiments UDPGalUA, UDPXyl, or UDPGlcUA was added to the reaction mixtures containing "UDP[U-14C1Api." The volume of the reaction mixtures con- taining "UDP[U-14C1Api" or UDP[U-14C]GalUA were 70 ul. The volume of the other reaction mixtures will be stated in the appropriate places in the Results. The reaction mixtures were incubated for 15 min at 25°C. At the end of the incubation period 1 m1 of 75% aqueous methanol (v/v) containing 1% KCl (wt/vol) was 42 added to the mixture and the precipitate was collected by centrifugation at room temperature. The supernatant solution was discarded and the precipitate was then extracted at room temperature as follows: twice with 1 m1 portions of 75% aqueous methanol containing 1% KCl, twice with 1 ml portions of methanol, and once with a 1 m1 portion of water. The radioactive material retained in the residue remaining after these extractions is referred to as the product in this dissertation. In the experiments reported here, D'[U-MC]apiose product, D-[U-l4 4 C]galacturonic acid product, D-[U-l C]glucuronic acid product, and D-[U-14C]- xylose product all refer to the products synthesized from 14C]G1cUA, and "UDP[U-14C]Api," UDP[U-14C]GalUA, UDP[U- UDP[U-14C]Xy1, respectively. When UDPGalUA, UDPGlcUA, or UDPXyl were added to the reaction mixture used to syn- l4C]apiose product it will be stated thesize D-[U- explicitly that the D-[U-14C]apiose product was syn- thesized in the presence of a specific nonradioactive sugar nucleotide. Radioactive material was solubilized from the product by suspending the product in freshly prepared 1% ammonium oxalate, pH 6.5, and incubating for 15 min at 50°C. After incubation the suspension was centri- fuged and the supernatant solution was removed. This procedure was repeated 3 additional times. In the first 43 extraction 0.3 ml of ammonium oxalate solution was used while in each of the subsequent 3 extractions 0.1 m1 of ammonium oxalate solution was used. The four extracts were combined. The radioactive material contained in the combined extracts is referred to as solubilized product in this dissertation. The same terminology used in the preceding paragraph is used to describe which radioactive sugar nucleotides were used to synthesize the solubilized product and whether nonradioactive sugar nucleotides were present in the reaction mixture, A.g., D-[U-14C]apiose solubilized product synthesized in the presence of UDPGalUA. The amount of radioactivity in the residue remaining after the extractions with ammonium oxalate were completed was determined by adding 3 drops of 2% NaOH to the residue, heating the suspension briefly in a boiling water bath, applying the suspension to a 2 cm x 6 cm piece of chromatography paper, and then assaying the paper for radioactivity by using scintil- lation solution C. In almost all experiments reported the solubilized products from several reaction mixtures were combined and then used in the various experiments. Whenever the solution containing solubilized product was concentrated it was first dialyzed either in 0.05 M sodium phosphate buffer, pH 6.8 or 7.7, or in water. 44 Partial Acid Hydrolysis with Fuming HCl Radioactive product was suspended in concentrated HCl to which an equal volume of fuming HCl (concentrated HCl saturated with HCl gas at 4°C) was added (42). The mixture was incubated at 27°C for 60 min. After incu- bation the mixture was diluted with 10 volumes of water and the HCl was removed by concentrating the sample to dryness at 40°C. The dilution and concentration was repeated 2 additional times. The resulting hydrolysis products were identified by paper chromatography. Hydrolysis at pH 1 The radioactive sample in solution was placed in a 1 dram screw-cap vial. A quantity of 2 M trifluoro- acetic acid equal to one-tenth the volume of the sample was then added to the vial. The pH of the resulting solution was tested with pH paper. If the pH was above 1.5 then additional 2 M trifluoroacetic acid was added until the pH was between 1 and 1.5. In this dissertation these conditions will be referred to as hydrolysis at pH 1. The solution was heated in an autoclave for 30 min at 121°C and 15 lb pressure, and it was then spotted on chromatography paper. The paper was developed in the appropriate solvent, scanned, and the radioactive areas were cut out and counted in scintillation solution C. Recovery of radioactive material on paper 45 chromatograms after hydrolysis at pH 1 was routinely between 85 and 90%. Aydrolysis at pH 4 The radioactive sample in solution and an equal volume of 0.5 M sodium acetate buffer, pH 4.0, were placed in a l dram screw-cap vial. The vial was heated for 3.5 hr at 100°C and the resulting hydrolysate was spotted directly on chromatography paper. The paper was developed with solvent A, scanned, and the radio- active areas were cut out and counted in scintillation solution C. The high concentration of acetate buffer used in this procedure was necessary because of the inherent buffering capacity of some of the samples. Recovery of radioactive materials on paper chromatograms after hydrolysis at pH 4 was routinely between 85 and 95%. Hydrolysis of Solubilized Product WIth’FungaI’Pectinase Radioactive solubilized product was dialyzed in water at 4°C as described in the individual experiments in order to remove ammonium oxalate. Portions of the solution of dialyzed solubilized product were mixed with a quantity of 0.5 M sodium acetate buffer, pH 4.5, equal to one-tenth the volume of the portion. The concentration of pectinase in the 0.5 M acetate buffer was 20 mg/ml. 46 The solution was incubated at 37°C for the times stated in the individual experiments. RESULTS Biosynthesis of Product and Solubilized’Product Aiosynthesis of D-[U-14C]Apiose Product and SolubiliZed Product When the procedure for the biosynthesis of radio- active product described in the Experimental Procedures was used with "UDP[U-14C]Api," 35% of the total radio- activity in the assay was incorporated into D-[U-14C]- apiose product (Table l). 14C]apiose Much of the radioactivity in D-[U- product was solubilized by treatment with ammonium oxalate. The temperature needed to solubilize the maximum amount 14 of D-[U- C]apiose product was determined. Identically prepared samples of D-[U--14 C]apiose product, each con- taining 13,000 dpm, were extracted with 1% ammonium oxalate at 22°C, 30°C, 40°C, and 50°C. This was done by extracting each sample of D-[U-14C]apiose product for 15 min with 0.3 m1 of 1% ammonium oxalate followed by 3 additional 15 min extractions each with 0.1 ml of 1% ammonium oxalate at the appropriate temperature. The remainder of the procedure was the same as that described in the Experimental Procedures except that the temperature 47 48 .uospoum poNAHHQsHOm on mpcommmuuouo .ooEuomumm mucmeflummxo mo mosses may ucmmmummu mammnpcmuom ca mosam> one .H: om mums mmusuxfis cowuoomu ecu mo moEsHo> map .wamuwauogmoo com «DUHUHUVHIDHmQD Eoum poscoum mo mammzucmm men mom .mouscmooum Hmucoeflum xm on» :H confluence mm meHUVHIDHmoD cam adooawfioealoamoo edaaooHOVHIDHmoD s.Hm¢_ovHIDHmoDe Eoum couwmosucmm mos uosooum omnwaflodaom coo uosooumm Ade ma Lav He mefloeHnDLEQD Ame m h we Ame m h mm dooao_oeauaamoo are H s Ho Lee G h as «aaooeoeauoemoo loo m s no ice m h mm seda_oeansaeoo= Awe Awe .musuxaz soauoomm on» as com: nucmEpmmHB muoaoxo ESHcOEEd mm uosooum oucw owumuom uofluouaosz Momsme IDH oouwawosaom uoscoum mo ucsoem (HoocH mua>wuomoflomm ea endoscope omnsahnsaom one nuooooud mnoasx_oeauoguo poo .osoa deco unsusaofiosanoguo .oaoa oaeousuonaoonoeaueauo .mnosdmnoeauaauo mo mendnudanoem .H mamas 49 was varied as indicated. Based on radioactivity measure- l4C]apiose product ments the following amounts of D-[U- were solubilized by ammonium oxalate treatment: 40% at 22°C, 50% at 30°C, 75% at 40°C, and 87% at 50°C. These results show that 1% ammonium oxalate readily solubilizes 14C]apiose product and that the extent of solubili- D-[U- zation is dependent on the temperature at which the extraction is performed. Water will also solubilize D-[U-14C]apiose product but not to the same extent as 1% ammonium oxalate. The procedure described in the preceding paragraph was used to extract the D-[U-14C]apiose product except that the 1% ammonium oxalate was replaced by‘water. The amount of D-[U-14C]apiose product solubilized was 10, 11, and 38% at extraction temperatures of 22°C, 30°C, and 50°C, respectively. Completeness of solubilization at 50°C was measured by extracting D-[U-14C]apiose product (25,000 dpm) with 0.3 ml of 1% ammonium oxalate followed by 5' additional extractions with 0.1 ml of 1% ammonium oxalate. Except for the 2 additional ammonium oxalate extractions the procedure is identical to the isolation of solubilized product described in the Experimental Procedures. The amount of radioactivity solubilized by each extraction was determined with scintillation solution B. The following amounts of radioactivity, 50 in order of extraction, were recovered in each extract: 18,184, 2,063, 1,704, 1,605, 759, and 421 dpm. These results indicate that 4 extractions at 50°C with 1% ammonium oxalate are adequate to isolate D-[U-14C1apiose solubilized product. Biosynthesis of D-[U-14C]Galacturonic Acid, D-[U-14C]Glucuronic Acid, and 5:10-14C]Xylose Products and Sb.ubilIzed Products 1 [U- 4C]Ga1UA, UDP[U-14C]GlcUA, and UDP[U-14C]Xy1 were used to synthesize the respective products and solubilized products (Table l). Radioactivity was incorporated into product from all the radioactive sugar 14C]G1cUA was not as efficient nucleotides although UDP[U- a donor as the other sugar nucleotides. The amount of radioactivity in the three solubilized products varied 14C]- (Table 1). Based on radioactivity measurements D-[U- galacturonic acid product was solubilized slightly better than D-[U-14C]apiose product but both D-glucuronic acid and D-xylose products had significantly less of their radioactivity solubilized by ammonium oxalate treatment. The completeness of extraction of these three solubilized products was investigated and was found to be similar to the D-[U-14C]apiose solubilized product. When the 4 solubilized products described in Table l were dialyzed at 4°C for 2 hr the recovery of radioactivity in non- diffusible material was greater than 75%. 51 Addition of UDPGalUA, UDPGlcUA, and UDPXyl to the Reaction Mixture usEH £9 Synthesize D-[U—14C1Apiose Product and Solubilized PrBHuct The effect of adding UDPGalUA, UDPGlcUA, and UDPXyl to the reaction mixture used to synthesize D—[U-14C]apiose product and solubilized product was determined (Table 2). These data demonstrate that of the three nonradioactive sugar nucleotides used, only UDPGalUA caused a significant increase in the incorpor- 14C]apiose product ation of radioactivity into both D-[U- and solubilized product. Addition of UDPXyl to the reaction mixture caused a large decrease in the formation of D-[U-14C]apiose solubilized product as only 32% of the D-[U-14C]apiose product synthesized in the presence of UDPXyl was solubilized by ammonium oxalate treatment. Addition of UDPGlcUA resulted in no significant change in the incorporation of radioactivity into D-[U-14C]- apiose product, although, the amount of product solu- bilized by ammonium oxalate treatment decreased to 81%. The results in Table 2 also show that almost all of each solubilized product was nondialyzable. Partial Acid Hydrolysis of - U- C]Apiose Product D-[U-14C]Apiose product was subjected to partial acid hydrolysis. The hydrolysate was chromatographed on paper with Solvents A and B and the radioactive compounds on the chromatograms were located with a 52 .mmsao> some momasoamo on com: mums one UoEMOMHmQ uses one» mucoeflummxm Hosofl>fioofi mo Henson 0:» mumcmammc monocucmumm ca mucosa: was .cowusHOm wmfiaovalagmas may cw ucommum muw>fiuomowcmn Houou can no memos can so omuoasoaoo mums m05am> Hoscfl>flocHo .mmsao> mmocu mcHEESm one muoaoxo Edwcoesm spas mc0fluomuuxo may Hmumo mcflcflmeou osoflmmu waosaomcfl we» cw can uosooum cmuaawosaom who cw mufi>fluooowcmu mo pesoso moo mswudmoofi mo ooswsumumo mos uoopoum comm cw muw>fiuom0Hcon mo ucSOEm one .nn H scoop mosses summon a so“: no N now ooe do .o.c me .udmmsn decompose season 2 mo.o so commaowo mos uoscoum coNflawosHOm zoom .ooooo mos Huxmos owns a: me can cocoa mums macaomao can Hmcwm one .ompoowocfi mm amxmos no .dooawmoo edoamumas mo mmHOEc v Hmnuwm cmswmucoo mmusuxfle cofiuommu may no mouse .momcmno mcflsoHHOH map How umooxo monotonoum Houcmeummxm on» CH cmowuommo mm counmoum mums posooum couwaaosaOm one uosooum mmOHQ¢H0vHIDHIom maneumamwosoz mos omen uosoonm touwawosHow wooedafloeau9_uo uoscoum ooNAHsnsHom ”WOHQ¢HUVHIDHUQ uosooum whofla«_oeauoluo H (V o \O (V m.mm Amv h.N H Adv m.ma ANV o.v H m.v~ Amv m.o H W) o o "3 Ace m.o H 0‘ o ‘0 W1 w.mm Amy m.o H m.HH ANV m.o H Amy w.m H F- 0 ‘fi F) Amy o.N H [x O F! V' m.mm Amv m.N H m.mm ANV 5.0 H Ame o.H Awe “we Lee Lee Huxmo: «oedema: anaconda msoz cowuooum hcowuooum comm cw ucomoum huw>fluooowcom mo pesoe< ommowuomaosz Homsm o>auomowoousoz mo unsound one mocmmmum on» so uosooum omuwawosHom one posooum omowmdfiovalbala mo mwmonusmm .N Manda 53 radiochromatogram scanner (Figure 2). Three radioactive compounds were located, one of which was at the origin and is presumed to be unhydrolyzed product while the other two compounds had Rf values identical to D-xylose and D-apiose in the two solvents. This establishes that 14C]apiose D-[U-14C]xylose was incorporated into D-[U- product from UDP[U-14C]Xy1 contained in the UDP[U-14C]- Api solution. Acid Hydrolysis at pH 1 Aydrolysis of D-[U-l4 Solfibilized Product C]Apiose Partial acid hydrolysis cannot be used to quanti- 14C]apiose and D-[U-14C]- tate the relative amounts of D-[U- xylose contained in D-[U-14C]apiose product because of incomplete hydrolysis. Treatment of cell wall poly- saccharides with l M trifluoroacetic acid for 1 hr and 121°C has been reported to result in complete hydrolysis (7). When tested in D-[U-14C]apiose solubilized product, 1 M trifluoroacetic acid hydrolysis did result in complete hydrolysis as defined by the total release of radio- activity as monosaccharides. However, after paper chromatography only 71% of the radioactivity hydrolyzed was recovered on the chromatogram (Table 3). In order to optimize the recovery of radioactivity after hydrolysis with trifluroracetic acid samples of D-[U-14C]apiose solubilized product were hydrolyzed with either 1.0 M, 54 .< ucm>aom as women so poemmumoumeouao mm3 mummmaouomn may one mmusomooum Houcmeflummxm map as confluommp mo mamaaouomn owoo Hofluuom Op UmuomflQSm mp3 uosooum mmowmmmu IDHIQ one .H: mom mo wEsHo> Hmcwm o no: scans musuxHE cowuommu ea may on compo mums maumz mo mmHOEn N can coaumummmum memucm muoasofluumm mo an oom umcu pmmoxm monsomooum Houcmefluomxm who cw confluommp mm omummmud mm: uosooum omOHmmHU IDHIQ .uosooum mmOHmmHU IDHIQ mo mflmmaouomn meow ea ea Howuumm on» Eonw Umcflouoo monotone on» no snow Eoumoumsonnooaoom .m musmflm 55 N ousmflm 325m 5 .9 Q mmo_n_<‘ mmo._>x U (5110 ~ asNOdsz-m 30103130 56 .< ucm>Hom nuHs coEHONHmm mp3 annoumouoeouno modem .mouoooooum HmucmEHumdxm may cH H mm on mHmmaoucmc oHom .mHSmmmum mocsom mH one oHNH mHMH> one .2H0>Huoommmu .2 Ho.o map chuoo ou mHMH> HosoH>HocH can .2 o. N m0 H2 N. m .2 o. N mo CH omUMHm cons mums 28mm ooov now cmoHHommc mm mos ousomooum one mo umUCHmEmH one no so H condos can m>MHoouso so cH cmomam cosh mums new .mo.o .H.o .o.H mo mCOHumuucmoooo Hmch omuHmmo ou compo mums oHom OHHmomouosHmHHu 2 N.o mo H: m.oa H: m. 0H .2 m. NH mo H: NH coo mHmH> moolsmuom Educ H .H: OONV mummmHMHc mo mmHmEmm .cHE om cam om Hmumm 0N2 mo woodman nqu u: N now 0N2 cH use so oonHoHo one monotonoum HoucoEHuwmxm on» cH omoHuommU mo pwummmum mos posooum UGNHHHQSHom omOHQNHUVHIDHIQm N.mm m.m o.mN N.mm Ho.o n.0h e.mN m.m o.mm mo.o m.Nn m.VN m.N N.mm H.o m.on m.>N o.N v.Hn o.H S; S; :3 3305 N ossomfioo H ccsomEoo GHOHHO Awe mHmmHouohm Emumouoeouno on» sH com: oHoe venom so 29H>Huom0Hpmm UHHmomouosHmHHa »UH>HuomoHoom ooum>ooom mo uGSOE< mo mum>oomm Hmuoe mo coHuoHucoosoo ncoo ndoHuo> equ uosoouo omNHHHndHom mnoHdano ocHo< oHumomouosHMHuB mo mcoHueuucmo eduaeuo mo mHmNHouon oHo< .m mamas 57 0.1 M, 0.05 M, or 0.1 M trifluoroacetic acid for 1 hr at 121°C. Two radioactive compounds were found when the hydrolysates were analyzed by paper chromatography (Table 3). The best recovery of radioactivity was ob- tained with a trifluoroacetic acid concentration of 0.1 M. For all four acid concentrations the percent of recovered radioactivity found in Compound 2 was nearly identical. The amount of recovered radioactivity found in Compound 1 was also nearly identical for acid concentrations of l, 0.1, and 0.05 M. However, Compound 1 was not released when the D-[U-14C1apiose solubilized product was hydrolyzed with 0.01 M trifluoroacetic acid. In another experiment hydrolysis times of 30 and 60 min with 0.1 M trifluoro- acetic acid resulted in identical recoveries of radio- activity on the chromatograms and identical quantities of recovered radioactivity in Compounds 1 and 2. There- fore, I decided that optimum results would be obtained if solubilized products were hydrolyzed at pH 1 for 30 min at 121°C. Samples of D-[U-14C]apiose solubilized product were hydrolyzed at pH 1 as described in Experimental Procedures and the resulting hydrolysates were chroma- tographed in Solvents A - D. All four chromatograms showed that 98% of the recovered radioactivity was con- tained in two monosaccharides which had R values of f D-apiose and D-xylose. Compounds 1 and 2 discussed 58 in the preceding paragraph, corresponded to D-xylose and D-apiose, respectively. Figure 3 shows the result of chromatographing the hydrolysate in Solvent A. These results established that the particulate enzyme preparation 1 from A. minor can incorporate D-[U- 4C]apiose and D-[U-14C]- xylose from their respective sugar nucleotides into D-[U-14C]apiose solubilized product and hence into 4 D-[U-14C]apiose product. D-[U-1 C]Glucuronic acid was not detected in the D-[U-14C]apiose solubilized product. 1 The determination of the amounts of the D-[U- 4C]xylose 1 and D-[U-14C]apiose contained in the D-[U- 4C]apiose product will be discussed later. H drolysis of D—[U-14C]Galacturonic Ac1 , D— U-14C]Glucuronic Acid, and D-lU-14C xylose Squbilized PrOducts Samples of D-[U-14C]galacturonic acid, D-[U-14C]- glucuronic acid, and D-[U-14C]xylose solubilized products described in Table l were dialyzed for 2 hr in water at 4°C and hydrolyzed in 1 M trifluoroacetic acid for 30 min at 121°C and 15 pounds pressure in an autoclave. All procedures for the hydrolysis except for the l M acid concentration were identical to that described in the Experimental Procedures for hydrolysis at pH 1. Each sample contained 5,000 to 7,000 dpm. Paper chromato- graphy was used to identify the radioactive hydrolysis 59 .mwm moB mEmumouoEouno was Co huH>Huom0HUmn mo mum>oomm .< qu>Hom CH momma Co pocmoumoumsouso mp3 mummmHouoan ecu oCo monotonoum HmquEHummxm 02» CH omQHuommp mm H mm on UmumHouomn moz Leap pCm mos UCC oonaaaosaon mHmmHouown ooo.oc ooooond ooneaaoseon onoedoloesuoluo oonmaoao was .cHs oo om Houmm Hopes mo mmmCCCo CHHB Dov Hm H2 N How nouns CH UmNmHmHU mousomooum HmquEHummxm map CH UmoHuommo mo coummmum mmz poscoum dmoHda2oe (CLIQ .uosooud o0NHHHndH0m mmoHdomo uaLuo o0 H mm up H VH umumo poCHouoo muodooum map mo Coon EmumoudEOHCUOHpmm .m mHCmHm 60 m ousmHm 525m 5 \‘1 mmo_n_< O mmo._>x o .3. 2225028 u (61.10 3SNOd S38 80133130 61 products. Recovery of starting radioactivity on the chromatograms ranged from 75 to 80%. The hydrolysates obtained from D-[U-14C]galac- turonic acid solubilized product were chromatographed in solvents A and E. Four radioactive compounds were detected on the chromatograms. One compound contained 60% of the recovered radioactivity and had the same Rf as D-galacturonic acid. These 2 solvents resolve D-galacturonic acid and D-glucuronic acid. A second compound with an Rf of D-xylose in Solvent A contained less than 6% of the recovered radioactivity. The remainder of the recovered radioactivity was contained in two compounds which were not identified but presumably are oligosaccharides containing uronic acid as they did not move far from the origin. The hydrolysates obtained from D-[U-14C]glucuronic acid solubilized product were chromatographed in Solvents A, C, and E. Four radioactive compounds were detected on the chromatograms. Interestingly, one compound con- tained 64% of the recovered radioactivity and had the same Rf as D-xylose. Of further interest was that the second major radioactive compound, which contained 23% of the recovered radioactivity, had the same Rf as D-galacturonic acid rather than D-glucuronic acid. The two unidentified radioactive compounds with the smallest Rf values are again presumed to be oligosaccharides. 62 Chromatography in Solvent C of the hydrolysate obtained from D-[U-14C]xylose solubilized product showed that the recovered radioactivity was contained in a single compound which had the same Rf as D-xylose. Solvent C is capable of resolving D—xylose and L-arabinose. From these results we conclude that the particu- late enzyme preparation from A. AAAQE apparently con- tained UDPGlcUA carboxy-lyase and UDPGlcUA 4-epimerase activities that convert UDP[U-14C1GlcUA to UDP[U-14C1Xy1 and UDP[U-14CJGalUA. The particulate enzyme preparation either does not contain UDPAra 4-epimerase activity to convert UDP[U-14CJXyl to UDP[U-14C]Ara or it cannot 1 incorporate L-[U- 4C]arabinose into solubilized product. gydrolysis of Authentic ApiogalaCturonan from Whole Plants Since previously described experiments showed that the particulate enzyme preparation from A. EAAQA incorporated D-[U-14C1xylose into product we decided to hydrolyze authentic apiogalacturonans (isolated from whole plants) with trifluoroacetic acid in order to determine whether they contained D-xylose also. Two apiogalacturonan fractions, isolated by Hart and Kindel l4C]22°C sodium chloride soluble fraction (104) [ (7,000 dpm) and [14c160°c sodium chloride soluble fraction (9,400 dpm), were hydrolyzed at pH 1 as 63 described in the Experimental Procedures. The hydroly- sates were analyzed by paper chromatography in Solvent A. Recovery of radioactivity on each chromatogram was 85%. Two radioactive compounds were detected in the hydrolysate of the [14C]22°C sodium chloride soluble apiogalacturonan fraction; one at the origin and the other with a Rf of D-apiose. The compound with a Rf of D-apiose contained 40% of the recovered radioactivity. Four radioactive compounds were detected on the chromatogram of the hydrolysate of the [14C160°C sodium chloride soluble apiogalacturonan fraction. One compound contained 26% of the recovered radioactivity and was located at the origin. Another compound contained 5% of the recovered radioactivity and had the same Rf as D-galacturonic acid. The two remaining compounds had the same Rf values as D-xylose and D-apiose and contained 27 and 41%, respec- tively, of the recovered radioactivity. The compound corresponding to D-xylose was eluted from the chromatogram and when re-chromatographed on paper in Solvent B it had the same Rf as D-xylose. Compounds with the Rf values of D-apiose and D-xylose were also identified when the hydrolysate from the [14C]60°C sodium chloride soluble apiogalacturonan fraction was chromatographed in Solvents C and D. These results indicate that D-xylose was contained in the apiogalacturonan fraction isolated from intact plants at 60°C. 64 Hydrolysis of D-[U-14C]Apiose Solubilized Prodibt Synthesizedmin the Presence deronradioactive Sugar Nudleotides D-[U-14C]Apiose solubilized products synthesized in the absence and presence of UDPGalUA, UDPGlcUA, and UDPXyl were hydrolyzed at pH 1 and the hydrolysates were 1 1 analyzed for D-[U- 4C]apiose and D-[U- 4C]xylose content (Table 4). These data show that the relative amounts of D-[U-14C]apiose and D-[U-14 C]xylose incorporated into D-[U-14C]apiose solubilized product were affected by the presence of nonradioactive sugar nucleotides in the reaction mixture. In addition to this data the data in Table 6 show that the percent of radioactivity contained in D-[U-14C]apiose increased with increasing amounts of UDPGalUA present in the reaction mixture. A decrease in the percent of D-[U-14C1xylose incorporated in the presence of UDPXyl is not surprising because of the resultant dilution of UDP[U-14C1Xyl. Addition of UDPGlcUA to the reaction mixture would also cause the formation of UDPXyl in the reaction mixture because of the presence of UDPGlcUA carboxy-lyase activity in the particulate enzyme preparation. 65 .ooECOHHom mos uCoEHHomxo nooo moEHu mo uonECC onu uComonoH mHmonuCoHom CH moCHo> one .omOmeHUvHIDHIQ CH ooCHmu (Coo mos omonoHUVHIDHIo CH oouo>ooou DOC wuH>Huoo0Hoom .C uCobHom nuHs mnmoumou IoEouno Momma an touMHoCo osos monommHouomn one .mousooooum HouCoEHuomxm one CH oonHuonoo no H me so omnmaouoms mums N manna sH omnHuonmo memoa can .asoaodoa .CDHmquD mo ooComon on» CH poNHmonqum muosooum ooNHHHnCHom omOHmoHovHIDHIQ ooumfloHo one can suppose ooNHHHnoHon mmoHdnnoeHuoluo oonsaoHo when H.m N.mm “He medoo H.OH 0.0 n o.Hm INC «aoHomoa m.H v.0 n m.mm Ame CoHoomo: m m.N H N.mb Avv oCOC “we omOmeHOvHIDHIo omonmmovHIDHIo CH ousuxH2 COHuooom 09 omoHQCHUVHIDHID oouo>ooom huH>Huoo0Hoom popom oUHuooHosz Hmmsm omooHuooHOCz Homsm o>Huoo0HooHCoz mo ooComon onu CH ooNHmonqum uospoum ooNHHHnCHom omOHCCHovHIDHIQ mo H mm um mHmmHouomm .e mHmCB 66 Hydrolysis of D-[U-14C]Apiose Solubilized Product at pH‘4 Hydrolysis of D-[U-14C]Apiose Solubilized Aroduct Synthesized in the Absence and Presence of Nonradioactive Sugar Nucleotides D-[U-14C]Apiose solubilized product was hydrolyzed at pH 4 and the hydrolysate was chromatographed on paper (Figure 4). Three peaks were obtained. The largest peak was due to material at the origin of the chromatogram which we assumed is unhydrolyzed D-[U-14C]apiose solu- bilized product. The other two peaks were due to 14C]apiose and [U-14C]apiobiose since they had the D-[U- same Rf values as the authentic compounds on the chroma- togram. No D-[U-14C1xylose was detected on the chroma- togram. The procedure would detect as little as 6% of l4C]apiose the D-[U-14C1xylose present in the D-[U- solubilized product. D-[U-14C]Apiose solubilized products synthesized in the absence and presence of UDPGalUA, UDPGlcUA, and UDPXyl were hydrolyzed at pH 4 and the amounts of 14C]apiobiose released from D-[U-14C]apiose and [U- each were determined (Table 5). These hydrolysis exper— iments demonstrate that the presence of nonradioactive sugar nucleotides during synthesis resulted in the formation of a solubilized product which released an 1 increased amount of D-[U- 4C]apiose and [U-14C]apiobiose when hydrolyzed at pH 4. 67 .wme mos Eoumouoeouno on» Co >DH>Huoo0Hoou mo >uo>ooom .Hn m mos oEHu mHmmHouomn on» Donn umooxo monsooooum HouCoEHHomxm onu cs oooHuouoo on e no on consaonoss was lame ooo.oe .Ha come .aoaooooo co ooComoum onu CH oouHmonqum .uosooum ooNHHHnCHom omOHmonu IDHIQ ooumeHc N vH one .un H Houmm nouns mo omCono o nuHB Uov so an N COM 0 m CH CoumHoHo mos posooum CoNHHHnCHom omonoHU (Dana one .H: me mo oECHo> HCCHm «H m can oCo CDHCUCQD mo moHOEC v ooCHmuCoo moHCuxHE COHuoooH one .mousooo (one HouCoEHuomxm onu CH ConHuomoo mo mouomoum mo3 .CDHoomoD mo ooComoum one on oouanosusmn .uosoone ooueaflnsaon onoedanoe (alto .aoanodoo no H ooComon onu CH CoNHmonuCem uosooum ooNHHHnCHOm omonoHU IDHIQ mo v mm um VH mHthouown onu Eouw moCHouno muospoum onu mo Coon EououoEounUOHoom .v oHCmHm 68 v oquHm mozgm E O mmoE< .0 mmo._>x mmoao :2 u (5110 3SNOd 538 80133130 69 .ooEHOMHom mm3 uCoEHuomxo nooo moEHu mo HonECC on» uComonou mHmonuCouom CH mosHm> one .wOOH ou Hoswo mH omonoHU HIDHIQ CH euH>Huoo0HooH onu oHnou mHnu CH oHOMouone .omOHnOHmoHUVHIDH Ho omOHmowU HIDHIQ mo CommoHoH mos noHn3 muosnoum ooNHHHnCHOm on» CH noCHouCoo omonoHU HID no mo uCoouom on» uComonou mosHo> one .hnmoumou IoEouno women »n UonHoCo Hos monommHouoen one .mousooooum HooCoEHuomxm on» CH omnHuonmo on e mm on omanonoHs mums N manna cH oonHuonwo Hexaoe pen .aooaodoo .CDHoUmoD mo oOComon onu CH ooNHmononem monotone ooNHHHnCHOm omonoHo IDHIQ coanmHo on» oCo uosooum ooNHHHnCHOm omoHQCHUvHIDHIo CoueHMHo oneo eH o.NH m.c~ .HV Hexdos m.mN v.mH .HV «DOHUmQD m.o H v.mN m.N H m.0N ANV «DHoomQD e.o n o.mH e.o n o.HH Ame oeoz Awe Ame oHCuxH2 COHuooom oe omoHnOHQCHUVHIDH omOHmnnovHIDHIQ nooon ooHuooHoCz Momsm mmooHuooHosz Homsm o>Hu0C0HooHCoz mo ooComon oCo ooComnC on» CH ooNHmonuCem uosooum ooNHHHnCHom omonCHUeHIDHIo mo e no no mHmeHouomm .m mqmne 70 Release of D-[U-14C]Apiose and lU-14C1Apiobiose as a Function deydrolysid'Time Samples of D-[U-14C]apiose solubilized product synthesized in the presence of UDPGalUA were subjected to hydrolysis at pH 4 for varying periods of time (Figure 5). These results showed that release of radioactivity from the D-[U-14C]apiose solubilized product was essentially complete after a 3 hr hydrolysis period although 50% of the D-[U-14C]apiose originally contained in the sample had not been released. We also 14C]apiose investigated the hydrolysis at pH 4 of D—[U- solubilized product and found that its hydrolysis at pH 4 was also complete after 3 hr. Hydrolysis of [U-14C1Apiobiitol I determined whether both moieties of the [U-14C]- apiobiose side chains of D—[U-14C1apiose solubilized product were synthesized AH vitro. [U-14C]Apiobiose was l4C]apiose solubilized product syn- isolated from D—[U- thesized in the presence of 4 nmoles of UDPGalUA by hydrolysis at pH 4 and was purified by paper chroma- l4C]apiobiose tography in Solvent A. A solution of [U- (6,500 dpm) was titrated to pH 10 with 0.5 M NaOH and was then made 80 mM in NaBH4. The solution was allowed to stand 16 hr at 22°C after which it was acidified to pH 3 with acetic acid. Addition of methanol and repeated concentration of the solution under reduced 71 .ooCHEuouoo mos omOHnOHmm (HUvHIDH CCo omOHmmHU IDHIQ mo oomooHoH pCo CHmHHo onp um uosoonm UoNHHHnCHom VH CH mCHCHCEoH omOHmoHUVHIDHIQ mo uCoouom ono e mm on oEHn mHmeHouown nooo mom .2 uCo>Hom CH momma Co Conmoumouoeouno onos monommHouomn on» oCm monsooooum HouCoE IHuomxm onu CH nonHuomoo mm H me no CoumHouoen ouoB monEom .CDHoumoD mo oOComoum on» CH oouHmonuC>m uosconm omOHmmnoe (9.19 on» mo uCouCoo omononoe (Data on» H H oCHEuouoo on uoouo CH .eHo>Huoommou .wmm CCo .mm .em .Nm .me .mm .mm oCoB un OH oCo .m .mN.m .v .m .N .H mo moEHo mHmeouoen How meoumoumeouno onu Co muH>HuoooHoou mo 2Ho>ooou one .Coms ouos Mn 0H oCo .m .mN.m .v .m .N .H mo moEHo mHmeHouomn ponu umooxo monsooooum HouCoEHuomxm on» CH nonHuomoo on v mm no ooNeHouomn ouos “ECU ooo.OH .H: OONV .CDHoUmQD mo oOComoum on» CH coNHmonunmm .uosooum ooNHHHnCHom omonoHU (CHIC vH coueHoHo onu mo monEom .v oHCmHm mo UComoH onu oCo monsooooum HouCoEHuomxm onu CH conHHomoo mo ooNeHoHn CCC pouomoum mos .CDHowmQD mo ooComoum onu CH ooNHmoanmm .oosooum UoNHHHndHom omonmHUv IDHIQ .CDHoumoD mo ooComon onu CH ooNHmonunem uoscoum H ooNHHHnCHom omOHmoHUVHIDHIo mo v mm on mHmmHoucen onu mo omuCOOIoEHe .m oquHm 72 m oHCmHm 585 us: 28:23; a e m _ _ _ mmoE< Ilfl. H.IIIIIIII III? \ m . llllll‘“ lllllll ' | I. I II |I.I.I| mmoao _n_< (.1 r... O 1 2.2% \ :30... R 6%) 3SOIdV 8H 73 pressure removed the borate as methyl borate. The reduced disaccharide was purified by paper chromatography in Solvent A and hydrolyzed in 0.04 M trifluoroacetic 14 acid for 30 min at 121°C. Conversion of [U- C]apiobiose to [U-14C]apiobiitol after NaBH4 treatment was greater than 90%. The hydrolysate was analyzed by paper chroma- tography in Solvent E (Figure 6). Two radioactive com- pounds were obtained which had the same Rf values as D-Apiitol and D-apiose. The amount of recovered radio- activity in D-[U-14C]apiitol and D--[U--14 C]apiose was 50.2 and 49.8%, respectively. The amount of radioactivity from [U-14C]apiobiitol that was recovered in D-[U-14C1- l4C]apiose was 92.6%. This experiment apiitol and D-[U- established that synthesis of both moieties of the [U-14C]apiobiose side chains occurred AH yAggg. Sodium Chloride Fractionation of D-[U-14C]- Apiose solubilized Produdt Hart and Kindel had shown that after 0.5% ammonium oxalate extraction authentic apiogalacturonans were fractionated into two components when treated with l M NaCl (102). Apiogalacturonans of high D-apiose con- tent were soluble in 1 M NaCl while apiogalacturonans of low D-apiose content were insoluble in 1 M NaCl (102). I have investigated the solubility of D-[U—14 C]apiose solubilized product in 1 M NaCl. D-[U-14C]Apiose solubilized product was dialyzed in water at 4° for 74 .muHCmom CH nonHuomoo mo Conmoumouoeouno UCC CoueHouomn mos UCo omoHnOHmoHUeHIDH Eoum ooummoum mos HouHHQOHQCHUVHIDH .HouHHnOHmonoeHIDH mo mHmmHouomn oHoo onu Eoum poCHouno muosooum onu mo Coom EoumouoaounUOHUom .m ousmHm 75 m ousmHm 5sz E .O mmo E< .5: _n_< U (6110 3SNOd 538 80103130 76 2 hr with changes of dialysis water after 30 and 60 min. The dialysate was diluted 1 to 10 with water. One mg of authentic 60° sodium chloride insoluble apiogalacturonan fraction was dissolved in 500 pl of the diluted dialysate. The solution was warmed to 22°C and stirred while 500 pl of 2 M NaCl was added dropwise. A precipitate formed during the addition of the NaCl. The suspension was centrifuged and the supernatant was removed. The pre- cipitate was washed once each with 500 pl portions of 2 M and l M NaCl and then was dissolved in 1 ml of water. The radioactivity in the NaCl soluble and insoluble fractions was assayed with scintillation solution B. The NaCl soluble fraction contained 1958 dpm and the NaCl insoluble fraction contained 71 dpm. The results indicate that D-[U-14C1apiose solubilized product has a high D-apiose content. DEAE-Sephadex Column Chromatography QHromatography of D-[U-14C1Apiose Solubilized Product Column chromatography with DEAE-Sephadex separ- ated the 0-[0-14 C]apiose solubilized product into 5 fractions (Figure 7). Recovery of solubilized products from the column was usually between 60 and 90% and in the experiment depicted in Figure 7, 81% of the 14 D-[U- C]apiose solubilized product was recovered. One radioactive fraction was eluted with 0.1 M NaCl, 77 .m one .o .0 .m .C mCoHuooum Snow on ooCHnEoo Con» ouos mCOHpooum CEsHoo nouCOHpCH one .m COHuCHom COHuoHHHoCHom nuHs euH>Huoo0Hoou How ooeommm ouos CCC mCoHuooum CECHoo on» Comm oo>OEoH ouoz muosdHHn .oquHm ono CH nouooHCCH Common ouonmmonm CH Hooz mo pCoHooum moon onu nuHs Conn pCo UouooHHoo ouos m on m mCOHuoon CECHoo oHHnB Common ouonmmonm nqu Couoouu mos CECHoo one .CECHoo onn Co oooon mos name ooo.ovv onEom HE m.H on» me couooHHoo ouos N UCC H mCOHuooum CECHOU .oouooHHoo onos mCOHuoouw HE o.H oCo un\HE 0N no: open son CECHoo one .mousooooum HouCoEHuomxm ono CH ponHuomoo mo A80 m x ECHU HoCuouCH so m.ov CECHoo xoconmomlmnmo C CO Conmoumouoeonno CCC Couomoum mos uosooum ooNHHHnCHom omoHQCHUvHIDHIQ .uosooum noNHHHnCHom omOHmoHUVHIDHIo mo Eonmouofiouno CECHoo xooonmomumdmo .e ousmHm 78 e ousmHm $2222 20 .55.“. s s . locotno / o\ {loyal \ I yo _ ’0 o x O l / l 0 <1 ... L ml m . Q q . o ..¥Wm¢ 1!, 4x a It . _oezzm.o__oezs_m~.e_ _ce22~.e_ . ooze; . P S A1|A|10V0|0V8 S (N0|10V8:| 83d WdG) 79 two with 0.2 M NaCl, one with 0.25 M NaCl, and a small fraction with 0.3 M NaCl. The indicated column fractions were combined to give 5 large fractions which were labelled, in order of their elution, A through E, with fraction A being eluted first and fraction E last. The percentage of recovered radioactivity contained in fractions A, B, C, D, and E was 15, 25, 32, 21, and 2%, respectively. Chromatography of D-[U-14C]Galacturonic Acid SOIubilized Product When D-[U-14C]galacturonic acid solubilized pro- duct was chromatographed on a DEAR-Sephadex column 2 major fractions and 3 minor fractions were recovered (Figure 8). Recovery of D-[U--l4 C]galacturonic acid solubilized product from the column in this experiment was 76%. Radioactive material eluted from the column in the same positions in the elution gradient as was seen for the chromatography of D-[U-14C]apiose solubilized product depicted in Figure 7 although the amount of radioactivity in the fractions was different. In Figure 8 the percentage of recovered radioactivity found in fractions A, B, C, D, and E was 3, 7, 41, 40, and 6%, respectively. 80 .m CCC .o .0 .m .C mCOHuomHm Snow on ooCHnEoo ouos mCoHuoon CECHoo ooHCOHoCH one .HE N mo oECHo> m CH CECHoo on» Co Cooon mos “amp ooo.mHV onEom one .5 oHCmHm mo UComoH on» CH oonHuomoo no “so m x ECHU HoCuouCH Eo m.ov CECHoo xoomnmomtmnmo C CO Conmoum Iouosouno mos oCo monsooooum HouCoEHuomxm on» CH ponHHomoo mm oouomoum mos nosooum nouHHHnCHOm oHoo OHCOHCHUCHCOHU IDHIQ .uosooum ooNHHHnCHOm CH oHoo UHCousuooHomHUVHIDHIQ mo Eoumouofiouno CEdHoo xonmnmomlmnma .m oHCmHm 81 m oHCmHm $9222 20 :05: cc ON .11 1 "1T 1 m. o o e a P L d . . . Was. 2 No .er 2 he .an 2 Ne _ 8.2 2 2 § (Nouovui 83d Wdfl) AllA|10V0l0V8 S 82 ghromatographyof D-[U-14C1Apiose Solubilized Productis ntheSized ih the Presence of UDEGalUA Comparison of the two elution profiles shown in Figures 7 and 8 indicated that a larger percentage of radioactivity present in D-[U---14 C]galacturonic acid solubilized product had was recovered in fractions C, D, and E than was recovered in the same fractions when D-[U-14C1apiose solubilized product was chromatographed on DEAE-Sephadex. If D-[U-14C1apiose and D-galacturonic acid are incorporated from their respective sugar nucleo- tides into the same polysaccharides then the acidity of the polysaccharide should increase because of the increased ratio of D-galacturonic acid to D-[U-14 C]apiose. D-[U-14C1Apiose solubilized product synthesized in the presence of UDPGalUA would therefore, when chromatographed on the DEAR-Sephadex column, have a higher percentage of radioactivity recovered in the more acidic fractions, which elute with the higher salt concentrations, than would D-[U-14C1apiose solubilized product synthesized in the absence of UDPGalUA. When D-[U-14C1apiose solubilized product, synthesized in the presence of UDPGalUA, was subjected to DEAE-Sephadex column chroma- tography 5 fractions were obtained (Figure 9). In the experiment reported recovery of radioactivity from the column was 78%. Radioactive material eluted from the column in the same positions in the elution gradient as 83 .m can ~o .0 .m .d mcowuomum EHOw ou omcHnEoo mumB mcowuomum cadaoo topmowocfl one .HE m.H mo mEsHo> m as cEdHoo may :0 cmomam mm3 “Eat ooo.mmv onEmm one .5 musmflm mo ccmmma mcu cw omnwuomoc mm “Eu m x Ewan Hmcumucw Eu m.ov CEsHoo xmomnmmmnmdma m :0 omcmmumoumsouso mmz cam mousomUOHm Hmucmsfiummxm map can N manna CH ombwuommo mm omummmum mmB .doamomos mo mocmmmum 0:» ca Umuwmmsucmm .uosooud consawnsaom omofim¢HUvHIDHIQ .moamomoo mo mocmmmum on» Ca omnammnucmm uosooum tonwaflnsaom mmOflmmHUv IDHIQ mo Emnmoumeouno GEdHoo xmomcmmmlm ommna .mm0axxHUvHIDHIQ cw ucmmmum was pontoum touwaflnsaom mmOHQMHUeHIDHIQ on» GM muw>fiuomoflomu may mo HoocfimEoH mnan .wnmmumoumfiouno cadaoo Hmumm Umum>oomu hufi>wuomoflcmu mo uCSOEm Hmuou on» Eouw omumasoamo mum: m canons» d mc0fluomum ca cmum>oomu >uw>wuom Iowomn mo unsoam may now connedmu mmoam> one .5 musoflm cw owumoflocfi mm mcofluowuw cEsHoo mamm on» mcflcHnEoo wn omchuno mum3 m cmsounu d mcofluomum .aam>wuommmmu .ucmmmum «Damomoa msocmooxm mo mmHOEc o.mH can .o.v .m.o nufi3 omnwmmsucmm uosooum omuflHAQSHOm nuw3 mucmeummxm may MOM mmm can .nn .Hm can ucmmwum «madame: msocmmoxm uoonuwz Umuwmmnucmm uosooum omuwafinsHom mmOAQMHUVHIDHIQ suw3 mucmeummxm 03u on» How wam can mm mm3 mcEsHou may :0 omomHm >uw>wuomowtmu on» mo hum>oowm .mHm>wuommmmu .Edo ooo.vv can .ooo.mm .ooo.hv omcflmucoo «panama: mo meOEc o.mH can .o.v .m.o mo mocmmmum map cw oouwmmcucmm mmHQEmm on» can Eat ooo.ov omcwmucoo comm «Samoan: mo mucmmnm may cw omnwmmcucmm uosooum omuflawnsaom mm0ammnou nDHIQ mo mmamemm N one .ummmsn mo HE m.H cw comm wumz mcEsHoo map so cocoam uosooum monwaancaom mmoamm_u HIDHIQ mo mwamsmm one .5 musmwm mo ocmmma may cw ponwuommo mm A80 m x Emwt Hmcum Ga 50 w.ov cesaoo xoomnmmmlm¢mo m co omnmmuooumsouco mum: muooooum omnwafinsHom one .>Hm>fiuoommmu .H: mm tam .vh .mh mumz mousuxHE cowuowwu may no moEdHo> HMCfim on» can monouxwe Goduommu mumwumoummm on» ou omocm mm3 «Damomoo mo mmaoec o.mH no .o.v .m.o was» umooxm monsoon Ioum Hmucmefluomxm on» Ca confluomco mm who: mmusuxwe cowuommu one .mmuscmooum Hmucma Iflummxm may cw confluommp mm omumdmum mm3 uosooum ownwaflnsaom mmoflmdgovalbulom m em mm m m oa o.oH e mm mm m 0 mm o.v m mm mm m «a om m.o N am mm mm ma om mac: v ow mm Nm Hm me ago: Amy “we Ame Awe “we Awe ammaoecv m o o m 4 mmohm< IHUVHIDHIQ ma ucmmmum uosooum ousuxwz coauommm cowuomum scum ca omum>oomm UmnwafinsHom mmon<~UvHIDHIa on popvd dnamumno >ua>wuomowomm mo uGsOE¢ cw >uw>wuowoaomm mo uc505¢ m mo mocmmmum 0:» ca powwmmnucwm uostoum mansaom mmme4~Uvaloulo mo msmuumouME lounu ampmnmomlmdmo Hound omcwmuno mcofiuomum cw wuw>wu080flomm mo GOMusnwuumwo .w mum Hocwm ocu poo «Deacon: mo moaoec v oocwoucoo «Deoomoa mo oocomoum on» cw uooooum oouHHHndaom oNHmoSHGMm on com: monopxwe coHHoooH one .oowzu ooEHOMHom mo3 HcoEHHomxo zoom .e ousmwm mo ocomoa onu Ugo monotonoum HoucoEHuomxm onu ca oonwuomoo mo .60 ma x Soap Hocuouce Eo m.ov ceoaoo xooocmomlmdmo o co cosmoumouosonno can monotonoum Houcoe Ifluomxm on» cw oonwuoooo mo touomonm mo3 uosooum touwaensaom omowmdflovHIDHIoo ¢.H ~.o H v.ev n.o H ~.mm m.o H N.mm o m.o m.m H v.am m.m H w.mm ~.H H 5.0m U .l l- I meow Um I I I o we to doaoomoo osocommxm mo oocomoum onu cw oouwmonucmm uosooum noneaensaom m.~ m.a H m.mv v.a H o.mH ~.~ H m.em o H.~ H.@ H H.m~ m.m H H.~H m.~ H e.mm o m.o e.a H v.m m.~ H v.~H N.o H m.~e m v.o m.H H m.m v.0 H a.m m.~ H m.mo m moommoonsz Howsmo>euommwoouc02I msocomoxm mo ooconnd on» cw ooNHoonucmm Hosooum couwawasaom Awe “we .wv omowmogovanHIo oomownowmd onowmd nooono cesaou I I_o use I_o Ioeuo I_o Iaeno 2H accumum xmcmrmmmumwmooowoom mo HcsoE< Eoum coauooum e no no mammaouoem odoamomoo mo oocoooum on» cw poo oowuooaosz Hmmsm o>HuoooHomucoz mo oncomnm on» cw oonwmocucem uosooum wouHHHnsHom mmon<_ovanoeun «0 mammumoumsouno asaaou xoumrammumema Eoum oocHouno ocowuooum Eouu ooownowm¢HU¢HIoH poo omoamdnovHIoan mo omooaom .e anode 9S .oouHHEo mmz v mm Ho mwmhaouoem .ooEuomuom mo3 H mm Ho mammaouoen oamcwm do .omownowmonov IDH Ho omowmofiovalsgla mo oomooaou oo3 nown3 mcoeuooum on» nH oonwmunoo oooemofiovanHIQ mo ucoouod onu ucomoumou mosao> one .mouoooo loam HounoEHuomxm onu cw oonwuoooo no v no no ooumaouomn ouoz mcowuuoum oneo .omoHMxHUvHIDHIo cw ucoooum mo3 euw>wuoooHoon on» no Hooceoeou one .ooowmoHUvHID_IQ cw ucoooum mo3 nown3 Eoumouoaouno on» some oopo>ooou eue>euooowoou mo Hcoouom on» Hcomoumou mosao> one .oousooo Ioum HoucoEHuomxm onu cw toneuoooo no H no no ooueaouoen ouoz ocoeuoouu onen .nucoswuomxo ouooeaooo onu How oouuooou ouo nowuoe>oo cooE poo mcooz .4 uco>Hom ca oonmoumouofiouno ouos mouooeaonoem .ooueaouoen too .Uoom Ho oououunoonoo .un we now Uov no nouns ca ooueaowo opoz ocoHuooum one .aoaoomoo mo oonomoum on» cw ponwmonuceo Hooooum ooueawnsHOm omowmoHUvHIoHIo nHH3 mucoEHuomxo 03» onu How web one mm Ugo oowuooaoon woman o>euoooHoou Icon mo oocomno onu cw powwoonuchm uooooum oouwawnsaomgo HIDHIQ nuH3 ounoEHuomxo 039 on» MOM wmv ono Hm mo3 :EsHoo onu scum muw>wuooowoou mo wuo>ooom .e ousmwm cw ooan IEoo ouo3 umnu ocowuooum cesaoo wouonasc oeoo on» mcwcwnsoo an cocaouno onoz a nmsounu 4 ocowuooum .oouooaaoo ouo3 ncoeuoouu HE o.m coo Hn\HE om oo3 ouou 30am :EsHoo one .Emo ooo.ooa can ooo.mva ponwoucoo poo Hommsn mo HE v.m cw nooo ouo3 floaoomoo mo oocoo Ioum on» n« nouwmonucho uusoouo oouwawnsaom ooowmoHUvaIDHIQ mo ooamson onu 0cm emu ooo.o~m one ooo.mma nonwoucoo coo Hommsn no as m onu ca nooo ouo3 oowuooaosn woman o>Huoo0eooHnoc mo oocoono on» cw powwoonuneo uosooum touwaandaoo ooOAQMHUvHIDHIa voucwucou .b qudfi 96 fraction was capable of releasing a greater percentage of its D-[U-14C]apiose as [U-14C1apiobiose and D-[U-14C1apiose than the preceding fraction. I also found, when the fractions were subjected to hydrolysis at pH 4 in the same order, that they released an increasing percentage of their D-[U-14C]apiose as [U-14C]apiobiose rather than as D-[U-14C]apiose as shown by the increase in the [U-14C1apiobiose to D-[U-14C]apiose ratio (Table 7). Once again, there were differences between iden- tical fractions obtained from D-[U-14C]apiose solubilized products synthesized in the absence and presence of UDPGalUA (Table 7). The fractions obtained after chro- 14 matography from D-[U- C]apiose solubilized product syn- thesized in the presence of UDPGalUA contained a greater 1 percentage of their radioactivity in D-[U- 4C]apiose than did the corresponding fractions obtained from solu- bilized product synthesized in the absence of UDPGalUA (Table 7). After hydrolysis of fractions C and D at 4C]apiose and [U-14C]apio- 14 pH 4 a higher yield of D-[U--1 biose was obtained from D-[U- C]apiose solubilized product synthesized in the presence of UDPGalUA than from D-[U-14C]apiose solubilized product synthesized in the absence of UDPGalUA. This is seen in fraction D, for l4C]apiose solu- example, where fraction D from D-[U- bilized product synthesized in the absence of UDPGalUA contained 88% of its radioactivity in D-[U-14C]apiose 97 of which 62% of the D-[U-14C]apiose was released after hydrolysis at pH 4 as D-[U-l4clapiose and [U-14CJapio- 1 biose. Fraction D obtained from D-[U- 4C]apiose solu- bilized product synthesized in the presence of UDPGalUA contained 95% of its radioactivity in D-[U—14C]apiose of which 81% of the D-[U-14C]apiose was released after hydrolysis at pH 4. However, the ratio of [U-14 1 C]- apiobiose to D-[U- 4C]apiose was lower in fractions obtained from solubilized product synthesized in the pre- sence of UDPGalUA than in the fractions obtained from D__[U_14 C]apiose solubilized product synthesized in the absence of UDPGalUA (Table 7). Fraction D obtained from the DEAR-Sephadex chromatography of D-[U-14C]apiose solubilized product synthesized in the presence of UDPGlcUA was also char- acterized. The fraction D material was obtained from the DEAF-Sephadex chromatography of D-[U-14 C]apiose solubilized product synthesized in the presence of UDPGlcUA which was described in the previous section. Fraction D was dialyzed 12 hr in H20 at 4°C and concen- trated to 1.1 ml. Two samples, each containing 4800 dpm in 500 pl of solution, were hydrolyzed; one at pH 1 and the other at pH 4 as described in the Experimental Procedures and the hydrolysates were chromatographed on paper in Solvent A. Hydrolysis at pH 1 showed that 95% of the recovered radioactivity was contained in D-[U-14C1apiose. The remainder of the radioactivity 98 was contained in D-[U-14C]xylose. Hydrolysis at pH 4 resulted in the release of 25.2% of the radioactivity in D-[U-l 1 _14 4C]apiose as D-[U- 4C]apiose and 58.8% as C]apiobiose. The ratio of [U-14C1apiobiose to 14 [U D-[U- C]apiose was 2.3. These results showed that 1 fraction D from D-[U- 4C]apiose solubilized product synthesized in the presence of UDPGlcUA and fraction D 14 from D-[U- C]apiose solubilized product synthesized in 14 the presence of UDPGalUA were similar in D-[U- C]apiose and D-[U-14C]xylose content and in their ability to 14 14 release D-[U- C]apiose and [U- C]apiobiose after hydrolysis at pH 4. Rechromatography of Fractions Obtained from fifiKE-SepfiadexColumn Chroma- togra h of D-lU-I4CJApiose SoIEBiIizea Product The homogeneity of the fractions collected from the DEAF-Sephadex column was investigated by chroma- tographing D-[U-14C]apiose solubilized product on a column of DEAF-Sephadex, isolating fractions A, B, C, and D, rechromatographing the fractions on a second column of DEAF-Sephadex, and determining the D-[U-14C1- apiose content of the different fractions before and after rechromatography (Table 8). Fraction B rechroma- tographed as a single component in its original position in the gradient as evidenced by the single peak that was obtained. Fractions A, C, and D each yielded two 99 on» no muoseHH¢ .ooom pm He H.H 0» umumuuamocoo ecu us me you 0.4 pm Hmums nH oonHoHo ono3 mnowuooum “now one .nEnHoo on» scum oouo>ooou mo: Honu mue>wuoo Iowoou on» no .>Ho>euoommou .wma ono .mm .ma .mm oonHoHnoo o ono .0 .m .n mnowuooum .e onnmflm nH oouoowonfl mm o nmnounu n mnoHHomum snow on ooanEoo ono3 mnoeuoonm nEnHoo oEom one .mve mo3 nEnHoo onu Eoum mue>wuooowoou mo >no>ooon one .oouooeaoo ouo3 mnowuoonm HE m ono Hn\HE om mo3 oHoH 30am nEnHoo one .Hommnn mo HE v nH mo3 nEsHoo map on totem rent ooo.oomo «Agata use .5 musmHm cH emnHuomme mm 1Ho> He m.e .50 me x Soap Honnoune Eo m.ov nEnHoo xooonmomlmnmo o no oonmonmouofionno ono monsooooum Hounoa Iwnomxm on» nH oonwuomoo mo oonomoum oo3 uonooum oonwawnnaOm oooHQnHUvaIanloo m.Hm 5.0N m e.mm m.vm o v.mm o m.mm m.vm o m.mh v.mm um m.hm U o.mm m.mm m m.mm m H.mm N.Mb m on H.mn a «.mm a A V m m Mme A v w n on ouofiounu w anmmumoumsouno uncomm Hound cannon nmnmmumoumeouno assnoo n onooom munonomeou Howoz xooonmomo umuwm A xooonmom Houmn unounoo nH omnHmHnoo emmnmmomuwmum Hound unounoo swwnmmowmwwm ooowmdnu IDHIQ euw>wuooowoom m . m oooflmmgo Isula m .u m we ooHo>ooom mo unnoen ea mauscoum wouHHHnsHom mmonanovHIsHIn Ho anamumou IoEounU nEnHou xooonmomlmdmo Baum oonwouno mnowuooum mo mnmonmouofiounoom .m mqmne 100 .nnomonm mm3 >nn>nnoo0noon nnononumnmnn omnooon ooumaouoen non mos Honuonozo .omoHexHUvHIDHIQ nn nnomoum mo3 mnw>nnoo Ionoou onn mo noonwoeou one .omonmoHOvHIDHIQ nn nnomoum mo3 nonnz EoumonoEonno uomom onn Eonm oouo>ooou >nn>nnoo0noon mo nnoonom onn nnoooumou monao> one .monnooo Ionm HonnoEnnomxm onn nn oonnuomoo no H me no poneaonoen ouo3 mnownooum onen .« nno>Hom nn mnmonmonoEouno Momma an Gonna Iuonoo mo: monomenouoen onn nn omoaexnovaloalo ono omonmoHUvHIDHIQ mo nnnoEo one .H me no nonmaonoen ono .Uoom no oononnnoonoo .oov no Honoz nH Mn on How nonmaowo onoz mnonnooum oonnneoo onn ono oonnnEoo onos nanaoo xooonmomIMdmo onoooo onn Eonm mnownooum nEnHoo onowumonmmd .»Ho>wnooomon .o ono .0 .m .4 mnonnooum How wme ono .ooa .mm .mm mo3 nEnHoo onn Eonm enw>wnooonoou mo eno>ooom .oEnHo> HE A no nEnHoo onn moHo>oo on too: mo3 .oEnHo> HE m.e mo nanaoo onn no poms ono onn on onnm nH HonOHnHomonm .nnowooumImono Huoz d .nao> HE H .50 m x sown Honnonnw Eo m.ov Gannon xooonmomImnmo onooom o nmnonnn .aaononmmoo .oonmmnmonoeounoou mos nonnooum oonounnoo Inoo nooo mo noonnoeou one .H an no oonaaonoen onos AH: ommv ononnoonu oononnnoonoo oonnnnnou .m anode 101 peaks on rechromatography. The 2 components of fraction A chromatographed in the positions expected of fractions A and B. The 2 components of fraction C chromatographed in the position expected of fractions B and C combined and in the position expected of fraction D. The 2 com- ponents of fraction D chromatographed in the positions expected of fractions D and E. The fourth column of data in Table 8 shows what percentage of the radioactivity recovered after rechromatography was contained in each of the fractions. For the rechromatography of fractions A, C, and D greater than 85% of the radioactivity recovered from the column was present in the 2 fractions reported in each Table 8. The rest of the recovered radioactivity was spread over the remainder of the column. For the rechromatography of fraction B, 30% of the radio- activity recovered did not elute with the single fraction reported in Table 8. Most of the radioactivity not con- tained in the reported fraction was present in the positions expected of fractions C and D as a trailing shoulder of the single large fraction. The amount of radioactivity that was present in each of the fractions after rechromatography was not invariant. An identical rechromatography experiment was performed, except that analyses for D-[U--l4 14 C]apiose and D-[U- C]xylose were not made. In this experiment the fractions rechromatographed in the same positions in 102 the elution gradient as in the experiment described in Table 8. The percentages of radioactivity which were recovered from the column in the individual fractions after rechromatography were as follows: for fraction A, 52.5% of the recovered radioactivity was found in the position of fraction A and 37.9% in the position of fraction B, for fraction B, 81.5% of the recovered radioactivity was found in the position of fraction B, for fraction C, 58.2% of the recovered radioactivity was found in the combined positions of fractions B and C and 32.8% in the position of fraction D, and for fraction D, 72.5% of the recovered radioactivity was found in the position of fraction D and 13.9% in the position of fraction E. l4C]apiose content of A comparison of the D-[U- fractions before and after rechromatography was made (Figure 8). In the case of fractions A, B, and D there were no changes in the D-[U-14C]apiose content even though rechromatography had resulted in fractions A and D each being eluted as two separate fractions. However, the two components that were recovered from rechroma- tography of fraction C had different D-[U-14C1apiose content from each other and from the original fraction C. 103 Gel Chromatography of D-[g:E4C]Apiose Solubilized Product and'D- U-quTGalacturonic Acid Solubilized Product 14 Column chromatography of D-[U- C]apiose and l4C]galacturonic acid solubilized products on Bio- D-[U- Gel P-300 showed that both solubilized products con- sisted of molecules of different sizes (Figure 11). Dextrans with a weight average molecular weight in the range 5,000 to 125,000 are fractionated by this gel (114). The chromatoqrams in Figure 11 show that 1 14C]galacturonic acid solu- D-[U- 4C]apiose and D-[U- bilized products both eluted from the column over the entire fractionation range. Based on radioactivity measurements the recoveries of D-[U-14C]apiose and D-[U-14C]galacturonic acid solubilized products from the column were 79 and 71%, respectively. Whether the peak of radioactive material that was eluted in the void volume of the column is also of variable size has not been investigated. A peak of radioactive material always eluted at V when D-[U-14CJga1acturonic acid t solubilized product was chromatographed on the Bio-Gel P-300 column. However, the peak of radioactive material depicted in Figure 11 which eluted at Vt when D-[U-14CJ- apiose solubilized product was chromatographed on Bio- <3el P-300 was not always seen (Figure 12a). The 1 (appearance of this peak with D-[U- 4C]apiose solubilized product was random between experiments ; the conditions 104 .noHnoon nooo nH oonooHHoo moB noan mnH>HnoooHoon oono>ooon Honon mo nnoonom onn nnomonmou Awe enH>HnomoHoon mo monHo> .m noHnnHom nOHnoH IHHnnHom nnHz enH>HnoooHoon now ooeommo onoz ono mnOHnoonm nEnHoo onn Eonw oo>oEon ono3 mnonoHHd .nn\HE m mo onon onm o no oonooHHoo onoz mnOHnooum HE ono .nEnHoo onn no ooOMHm ouoz .HE m.o mo oEnHo> o nH .wHo>Hnoonon .Emo ooo.mH ono ooo.H~ manHonnoo .mnonooum ooNHHHnnHOm oHoo UHnonnnooHom IHUVHIDHIQ ono omonnnov IDHIQ .m.m no .uowmnn onmnomonm EnHoOm z no.0 H nnH3 ooQOHo>oo ono oononnHHHnoo moz nOHnB n50 ov x EoHo HonnonnH Eo Hv nEnHoo oomIm HooIon o no oonmonmonoeonno ono monsoooonm HmnnoEHnomxm onn nH ooanomoo mo oonomonm onoz mnonoonm ooNHHHnnHom oHoo oHnonnnOMHomHo IDHIQ onm VH IDHIQ ono nonoonm omonnnUv IDHIQ .nonoonm ooNHHHnnHOm oHoo UHnonnnooHomHU H ooNHHHnnHom omoHQMHUv «H HIDHIQ mo mamnmonoEonno nEnHoo oomlm HooIOHm .HH ouanm Q (.0 O ’ . . .. Z3 ,3 < .v' o f" 2 j C) o o: 4., D o I— ,o O —"‘” ‘ :5 .3 '. Ca in. .3 0:” 3% . o g D— I < .‘0" Q: 0'.‘ - coo-IIIII' O. O —’ O O a. . . ..... (%) All/\IlOVO IGVH 10 FRACTION NUMBER Figure 11 106 .nOHnooum nooo nH oonooHHoo mo3 noan mnH>HnoooHoon nono>ooon Honon mo nnoonom onn nnomonmou Amy enH>Hnoo0Hoon mo monHo> .HH ouanm mo onomoH onn nH ooanomoo mo nEnHoo oomlm HooIOHm onn no mHonouomom oonmonmonofionnoou nonn moz nOHnoonw oononnnoonoo nooo mo noonHoEon one .monnoooonm HonnoEHnomxm onn nH ooanomoo mo H mm no woNeHOnoen ono oo>OEoH onoz nOHnoon nooo mo AH: oomv mnOHnnom .oomm no HE e.o on oononnnoonoo mo3 noHnB mo nooo .HHH ono .HH .H noHnoonm EHOM on ooanEOo onoB now nH mnOHnooum nESHoo tonooHonH one .wmn mo3 nEnHoo onn Eonm enH>Hnoo0Hoou mo >no>ooon one .m nOHnnHom nOHnoHHHnnHom nnHz mnH>Hnoo0HooH MOM ooeommo onoz ono mnOHnoonm nEnHoo onn Eonw oo>oeon onoz mnonoHHn .HH onanm mo onomoH onn nH oonHHomoo mo nEnHoo oomIm HooIon o no oonmonmonoeouno ono ooem no HE m.o on oononnnoonoo mos nEmo ooo.eMHV onomeHoHo onn mo onEom HE m.m n .nn H nonmo omnono nommnn o nnHz 00v no nn m now .m.m no .nommnn ononmmonm anHUOm z mo.o nmnHomo oouwHoHo mo: monsoooonm HonnoE IHuomxm onn nH ooanomoo mo oonomonm AHE v nH .Emo ooo.mmHv nonooum ooNHHHnnHom omOHmnmov IDHIQ .nnv mnOHnoonm oonooHom mo unmoumonofionnoon onn ono nov nonconm H ooNHHHnnHom omOHmoHUVHIDHIQ mo mEonmonoEonno nanHoo oomlm HooIOHm .NH onanm (96) All/\ILOVOIGVU 107 RADIOACTIVITY (94.) (96) MIA IlOVO IO V8 I--- H ‘o ...... 0‘ III 0 In .—I l l O, 0". 0". o’.‘.. 0".. 0". O... I R v’ R 1.. J fig 0‘.. 00‘... i / ..."o r ’x a" .‘I a Q. a». \ \ \K. n\ I 2 2 .Q J l m c: U\ ed :3 N H I .——0 FRACTION NUMBER Figure 12 108 for its appearance were not investigated. Comparison of the two chromatograms in Figure 11 showed that the D-[U-14C]apiose solubilized product contained more molecules of large size which eluted in the void volume than did the D-[U-14C]galacturonic acid solubilized product. The homogeneity of the fractions obtained from the chromatography of D-[U-14C]apiose solubilized product on the Bio-Gel P-300 column was investigated (Figure 12). D-[U-l4 C]Apiose solubilized product was chromatographed on the Bio-Gel P-300 column and the fractions indicated in Figure 12a representing large, medium, and small 14C]apiose solu- molecular weight components of the D-[U- bilized product were labelled fractions I, II, and III, respectively, and were rechromatographed on the Bio-Gel P-300 column. The results showed that fractions I, II, and III had the same elution volumes on rechromatography as they had in the initial chromatography on Bio-Gel P-300 although each distributed itself over a larger molecular weight range on rechromatography (Figure 12b). Samples of D-[U-14C]apiose solubilized product prior to rechromatography and fractions I, II, and III were hydro- lyzed at pH 1 and chromatographed on paper with Solvent A. Analysis of the chromatograms showed that the 14 D-[U- C]apiose solubilized product before chromatography 1 contained 79.5% of its radioactivity in D-[U- 4C]apiose. 109 Fractions I, II, and III contained 82.4, 76.8, and 80.4%, 1 respectively, of their radioactivity in D-[U- 4C]apiose. The remainder of the radioactivity was contained in D- [U-14C]xylose. The similar D-[U-14 14 C]apiose content of the three fractions and of D-[U- C]apiose solubilized product showed that D-[U-14C]apiose and D-[U-14C]xylose were not concentrated in molecules of a particular size. The chromatograms obtained from the chromatography of D-[U-14C]apiose and D-[U--l4 C]galacturonic acid solu- bilized products on a Bio-Gel P-100 column were dissimilar (Figure 13). D-[U-14C]Apiose solubilized product eluted from the column predominantly at the V0 (Figure 13a). There was no elution of radioactive material at Vt' On the other hand, D-[U-14C]galacturonic acid solubilized product eluted from the column over the entire fraction- ation range of the Bio-Gel P-100 column. These results indicate that the smallest molecules of D-[U-14CJgalac- turonic acid solubilized product are smaller than the 1 smallest molecules of D-[U- 4C]apiose solubilized product. "Degradation" of D-[p—14CJApiose Solubilized product andD-[U-I‘EJGalacturonic AcId’ Sclubilized Product 14 If D-[U- C]apiose solubilized product was dialyzed in water prior to column chromatography on Bio-Gel P-300 there was a significant change in elution profile when compared with the chromatogram obtained 1 from nondialyzed D-[U- 4C]apiose solubilized product 110 Figure 13. Bio-Gel P-lOO column chromatograms of 14C]apiose solubilized product (a) and D-[U-14C]- 1 D-[U- galacturonic acid solubilized product (b). D-[U- 4C]- Apiose and D-[U--14 C]galacturonic acid solubilized pro- ducts were prepared as described in the Experimental Procedures and chromatographed on a Bio-Gel P-lOO column (1 cm internal diam x 40 cm) which was equil- ibrated and developed with 0.05 M sodium phosphate 1 14C]galac- buffer, pH 6.8. D-[U- 4C]Apiose and D-[U- turonic acid solubilized products, containing 24,000 and 12,000 dpm, respectively, in a volume of 0.6 ml were placed on the column. One ml fractions were collected at a flow rate of 20 ml/hr. Aliquots were removed from the column fractions and were assayed for radioactivity with scintillation solution B. Based on radioactivity measurements the recoveries 14C]apiose and D-[U-l4 of D-[U- C]galacturonic acid solubilized products were 95 and 79%, respectively. Values of radioactivity (%) represent the percent of total recovered radioactivity which was collected in each fraction. RADIOACTIVITY (%) 15 10 10 111 FRACTION NUMBER Figure 13 112 (Figure 14). Dialysis in water resulted in a decrease in the amount of radioactive material which eluted at V0 and a concurrent increase in the amount of radio— active material which eluted at Vt‘ However, dialysis of D-[U-14C]apiose solubilized product in sodium phos- phate buffer prior to chromatography resulted in no change in elution from the Bio-Gel P-300 column (Figure 14). This process which resulted in a decrease in the amount of large molecular weight components of the solubilized product as demonstrated by gel-chroma- tography was named "degradation" by us. I have attempted to reverse the "degradation" 14 of D-[U- C]apiose solubilized product caused by dialysis in water by performing a second dialysis in sodium phos- phate buffer. D-[U-l4 C]Apiose solubilized product was prepared and divided into 2 samples. One sample, con- taining 27,000 dpm in a volume of 0.5 ml, was chroma- tographed on the Bio-Gel P-300 column. The other sample containing 60,000 dpm was dialyzed in water for 16 hr at 4°C with changes in water after 1 and 4.5 hr. The recovery of radioactive material after dialysis in water was 65%. A sample of the water dialysate, containing 17,000 dpm in a volume of 0.5 ml, was chromatographed on the Bio-Gel P-300 column. The remainder of the water dialysate was then dialyzed in 0.1 M sodium phosphate buffer, pH 6.8, at 4°C for 24 hr 113 .noHnoonm nooo nH oonooHHoo moB noHn3 enH>Hnoo0Hoon oono>ooon Honon mo nnoonom onn nnomonmon Awe mnH>HnoooHoou mo monHo> .eHo>Hnoommon .monEom ooNeHoHo ononmmonm ono .ooNeHoHo nono3 .oommHoHo Inon onn now Mme ono .mm .OOH onoz nEnHoo onn Eonm moHHo>ooon onn mnnoE IonnmooE enH>HnoooHoon no oomom .HH onanm mo onomoH onn nH ooanomoo mo nEo mm x EoHo HonnonnH Eu HV nEnHoo oomlm HooIon o no oonmonmonoEonno nonn onoB monEom oonnn one .mHo>Hnoomoon .wmm ono we mos ononmmonm ono nonoz nH mHmmHoHo nonmo HoHnonoE o>Hnoo0Hoon mo moHno>ooom .e.n no .nomwnn ononmmonm EnHWOm z mo.o nH onEom nonno onn Uno mono? nH onEom ono “nn H nonmo nommnn mo omnono ono nnHz Dov no Mn m.m now UoNeHoHo ono3 monEom onn mo oBe .HH: oom nH .Emo ooo.vmv monEom m onnH oooH>Ho mo? ono monsoooonm HonnoEHnomxm onn nH ooanomoo mo oouomonm mo: nonoonm UoNHHHnnHom omonn Ino IDHIQ .nonoonm ooNHHHnnHOm omOHmonUvHIDHIQ ooweHoHo ononmmonm EnHUoo ono vH .ooumHoHo nonoz .ooneHoHonon mo mEonmonoEonno nEnHoo oomnm HooIOHm .vH onsmHm 114 c: LIJ N / 33 <( ‘/” — z- a CD‘\\*5>/‘/, . o IN a’ -- > —-1-- / ,v’ 0'. 9 ‘ I k A. .‘ _ a ’ LLJ I DJ >_ ._.| m, o Lu DJ >— _l <( 9 2 CD 2 l J 00 <1 (%) All/\llOVOIGVU 20 FRACTION NUMBER Figure 14 115 with changes of buffer after 2 and 5 hr. Recovery of radioactive material after dialysis in phosphate buffer was 69%. A sample of the phosphate dialysate, containing 13,000 dpm in a volume of 0.5 ml, was chroma- tographed on the Bio-Gel P-300 column. In all cases chromatography on the Bio-Gel P-300 column was performed as described in the legend of Figure 11. The recoveries of radioactive material from the columns for the non- dialyzed sample, water dialyzed material, and water dialyzed then phosphate dialyzed material 88, 88, and 92%, respectively. Comparison of the three Bio-Gel P-300 chromatograms showed that dialysis in sodium phos- phate buffer was unable to reverse the "degradation" caused by dialysis in water. 14C]_ Dialysis in water also "degraded" D-[U- galacturonic acid solubilized product. Although a chromatogram from this experiment is not presented D-[U-14 C]galacturonic acid solubilized product was dialyzed for 3 hr in water at 4°C and chromatographed on a Bio-Gel P-lOO column as described in Figure 13 except that 2 ml fractions were collected. A sample of nondialyzed D-[U-14C]galacturonic acid solubilized product was similarly chromatographed on the column. Recovery of radioactivity after dialysis in water was 78% and recoveries of radioactivity from the Bio-Gel P-100 column after chromatography of non- dialyzed solubilized product and solubilized product 116 dialyzed in water were 100 and 84%, respectively. The water dialysate had a decreased amount of radioactive material that eluted in the column V0 and an increased amount of radioactive material eluted at Vt when com- pared with the sample that was not dialyzed. D-[U-14C]- Galacturonic acid solubilized product was also dialyzed in 0.05 M sodium phosphate buffer (pH 6.8) for 3 hr at 4°C and was chromatographed on the Bio-Gel P-lOO column as described above. The recovery of radioactivity after dialysis was 98% and recovery after column chromatography was 74%. "Degradation" did not occur during dialysis in phosphate buffer as there was essentially no dif- 1 ference in the elution profiles of D-[U- 4C]galacturonic acid solubilized product dialyzed in sodium phosphate 14 buffer and of nondialyzed D-[U- C]galacturonic acid solubilized product. When D-[U--14 C]apiose solubilized product was chromatographed on a Bio-Gel P-300 column and then dialyzed in water, it was not "degraded" (Figure 15). After water dialysis fraction I still eluted at V0, thus indicating that under these conditions "degra- dation" did not occur. Although the data are not presented here, degradation was also not obtained when the V0 fraction obtained from the Bio-Gel P—lOO 14 column chromatography of D-[U- C]galacturonic acid 117 Figure 15. Bio-Gel P-300 column chromatograms of D- [U-14C]apiose solubilized product (a) and the rechroma- tography of a selected fraction after dialysis in l4C]Apiose solubilized product water (b). D-[U- (200,000 dpm) was dialyzed in 0.05 M sodium phosphate buffer, pH 6.8 concentrated, and chromatographed on a Bio-Gel P-300 column as described in the legends of Figures 11 and 12. The concentrated sample (160,000 dpm) was placed on the column in a volume of 0.5 ml. Recovery of radioactivity after column chromatography was 89%. The indicated column fractions in (a) were combined to form fraction I. A sample of fraction I (20,000 dpm) was dialyzed in water for 6 hr at 4°C with changes of water after 2 and 4 hr. Recovery of radio- active material after dialysis was 89%. The dialysate was concentrated to 0.5 ml and was rechromatographed on the Bio-Gel P-300 column as described in Figure 11. Recovery of radioactivity from the column was 66%. 118 _ - T m om m 95.55: n: 2%: E>EHonH nooo nH oonooHHoo mos noHnB mnH>Hnoo0Hoon oono>ooon Honon mo nnoonom onn nnomonoon Awe mnH>Hnoo0Hoon mo monHo> .HH onnon mo onomoH onn nH ooanomoo mo oonnHo ono nEnHoo oomIm HooIon onn on He m.o no oeono> o cH coHHdoo cums «oncoooo redo ooo.mmv cooron coo redo ooo.mmv nnH3 ooNHmonnnhm mnonooum ooNHHHnnHom omonnHUvHIDHIo .H: mm mo oEnHo> HonHm o nH noHoomoD mo moHOEn v oonHonnoo «DHoomoD mo oonomonm onn nH nonoonm ooNHHHnnHom omOHmoHU IDHIQ oNHmonnnem on noon onnanE nOHnooon one vH .monnoooonm HonnoEHnooxm onn nH ooanomoo mo oonomono moz nonoonm ooNHHHnnHom omonnnu IDHIQ .noHoomoD mo oonomno Uno oonomonm onn nH ooNHmonnnem nonoonm VH ooNHHHnnHOm omOHmoHUo IDHIQ mo mEonmonoEouno nEnHoo oomIm HoonHm .eH onanm H 125 ‘ one-ounce... o ..._ 10 l I To Q N (%) AllAllOVOIGVH FRACTION NUMBER Figure 17 126 .noHnoonm HonoH>HnnH nooo nH nonooHHoo mo3 noHnB mnH>HnoooHoon nono>ooon Honon mo nnoonoo onn nnomonmon va enH>Hnoo IoHoon no monHo> .mHo>Hnooomon .nHE mH ono .m .m.o no mnOHnonnonH HOW soc oom.~n coo .ooo.on .oo~.m mo; noncond coonnnoonom mo oononomH mnH>Hooo IoHoon no nnnoso one .mH onanm no onoooH onn nH noanomoo mo nEnHoo OOHIm HooIon onn no nonoonmonoeonno onoz HE m.o no oEnHo> o nH mnonoono UoNHHHnnHom oHoo OHnonnnooHomHU IDHIQ onn .nOHnoHomH nonmn .monnooo «H Ionm HonnoEHnomxm onn nH noanomoo mo whommo omonn Bonn oouomonm moz nonoonm ooNHHHnnHom .nHE mH now nonno onn nno .nHE m MOM ono .nHE m.o MOM ono “oomm no nononnonH onoz monnanE nOHnooon oonnn HHn .monnnooonm HonnoEHnomxm onn nH noanomoo mo nouooono ouo3 nonoonm ooNHHHnnHOm oHoo UHnonnnooHomHU IDHIQ no mHmonnnem onn now monnanE nOHnooon HoOHnnooH VH oonne .nHE mH ono .N .m.o nH ooNHmonnnem nonoonm UoNHHHnnHOm oHoo UHnonnnooHomHUv IDHIQ no mEonoonoEOnno nEnHOo OOHIm HoUIon .mH onanm H 127 12.. 6 (%) AllAllOVOIGVH I r _. ' g? o , 9' CA.. ‘73... 0,0! I; I! 6 r Qf‘ o I" J .5" ’o’ I.— ——) D .— >"" J a}, R '4. If ‘ o' \ as! ué§§é E E \‘7” 55 0" F— E:‘ cu ‘{;;:Z _. 83 10 FRACTION NUMBER Figure 18 128 1 D-[U- 4C]galacturonic acid product and 96, 94, and 89%, l4C]galacturonic acid product respectively, of the D-[U— was solubilized by ammonium oxalate extraction. Recovery of radioactivity from the column was 84, 76, and 83% for material synthesized with incubation times of 0.5, 2, and 15 min, respectively. Comparison of the elution profiles showed that as the reaction mixtures were incubated for longer periods of time the percent of radioactive material which eluted in the V0 increased. These results indicated that the size of the molecules of D-[U-14C]galacturonic acid solubilized product increased with increasing incubation time. The size of the D-[U-14C]apiose solubilized product synthesized in the presence of UDPGalUA, as determined by chromatography with Bio-Gel P-300, was also affected by the length of the incubation period used in synthesis (Figure 19). For the 0.5 and 15 min incubations 6.4 and 44.1%, respectively, of the starting radioactivity was incorporated into D-[U-14C]apiose product of which 91.4 and 90.2%, respectively, was solubilized by ammonium oxalate extraction. Recovery l4C]apiose of radioactivity from the column for D-[U- solubilized product synthesized with incubation times of 0.5 and 15 min was 83 and 77%, respectively. Com- parison of the two elution profiles showed that D-[U-14C]apiose solubilized product synthesized in 129 .nOHnOoMM Hon©H>HonH nooo nH nonooHHOO mo3 nOHnB enH>Hnoo IOHooM noMo>OOoM Honon MO nnoOMom onn nnomoMmoM nwv mnH>HnooOHooM MO monHo> .HH oManm MO onomoH onn nH nonHMOmoo mo AEO on x EoHo HonMonnH Eo HV nEnHOO oomlm HoUIOHm o no nonmoMmOnoEOMno oMo3 .HE m.o MO oEnHO> o nH .mnonUOMm ooNHHHnnHOm omOHmoHU IDHIQ one .noHnonnOnH nHE mH onn oH EOMM Eon ooo.mm nno nOHnonnOnH nHE m.o onn EOMM Eon oov.m moa nonoOMm noNHHHnnHOm omOHoonU IDHIQ mo nonoHOmH MnH>HnoocHooM MO nnnOEo one «H .moMnooOOMm HonnoEHMomxm onn nH nonHMomoo mo meommo omonn EOMM ooMom IoMm mo? nonoOMm ooNHHHnnHom .nHE mH MOM Monno onn nno nHE m.o MOM ono .oomm no nononnonH oMoB whommo nnom .H: mm MO oEnHO> HonHM o non ono anoomoD MO moHOEn v nonHonnOO oMnanE mommo noom .moMnUoOOMm HonnoE IHMomxm onn nH nonHMomoo mo ooMoooMm oHoB nDHoomoD MO oonomoMm onn nH ooNHm Ionnnem nonoOMo noNHHHnnHOm omOHooHUw IDHIQ MO mHmonnnmm onn MOM moMnanE H nOHnoooM HoOHnnonH Oze .nHE mH ono nHE m.o nH UoNHmonnnem nonoOMm noNHHHn InHOm omOHmonu ID_IQ MO mEoMmonoEOMnO nEnHOO oomIm HooIOHm .mH oManm VH 130 mH oManm $9222 20 :05: cm _ 2:23 (%) All/\llOVOIGVH 131 0.5 min contained a greater percentage of radioactivity in molecules which eluted in the column VO than did D-[U-14C]apiose solubilized product which was synthe- sized in 15 min. These data suggest that acceptor molecules of larger size were preferentially used in the synthesis of the polysaccharide. Pectinase Hydrolysis of Solubilized figroducts Hydrolysis of D-[U-14C]Apiose SolubilizedEProduct Untreated D-[U-14C]apiose solubilized product and D-[U-14C1apiose solubilized product treated with pectinase were chromatographed on a Bio-Gel P-lOO column (Figure 20). Most of the untreated D-[U-14C]- apiose solubilized product eluted from the column in the V0. The treated material, on the other hand, eluted over the entire fractionation range of the column indicating that enzyme catalyzed hydrolysis of 14 the D-[U- C]apiose solubilized product had occurred. The amount of D-[U-14C]apiose and D-[U-14C]- xylose contained in the fragments resulting from pectinase hydrolysis was investigated. D-[U-14C]Apiose solubilized product was treated with pectinase and then chromatographed on a column of Bio-Gel P-30 (Figure 21). The fractions indicated in Figure 21 and labelled as 1, 2, and 3 were each concentrated to approximately 200 p1 at 30°C. The three samples were hydrolyzed at 132 .nonoOMm ooNHHHnnHOm omOHmonU IDHIQ nonooMn omoanoom MOM wow ono nonoOMm ooNHHHnnHOm omOHmo VH IHUVHIDHIQ UonooMnnn MOM mew oMo3 nEnHOU OOHIm onn EOMM moHMo>Ooom .m nOHnoHOm nOHnoHHHnnHom mnHmn en nowommo mo3 enH>HnooOHoom .nonooHHoo oMoB mnOHnooMM HE mm.o ono Mn\HE m.H mos nEnHOO onn MO onoM 3OHM one .anHM nonooMmon IoEOMnO moz onEom nonooMnnn onn “MoMMnn ononomonm EnHoom 2 Ho.o nnH3 nonoMnH IHHnoo noon non nOHnB AEO OH x EoHn HonMonnH EO e.ov nEnHOO OOHIm HooIon o no nonmoMmOnoEOMno oMo3 monEom onn nOHnonnOnH MonMn .erm no Mn mm MOM nononnonH oMoB monEom o3n one .m.v mm .MoMMnn ononooo EnHoOm 2 m.o Mo H1 om ooooo moz noonooMnnnv nOHnMom Monno onn oe .moMnnoOOMm HonnoEHMomxm onn nH nonHMomoo mo omoanoom nnH3 oonooMn no: nonoOMm ooNHHHnnHOm MO nOHnMom ono .monnn onoMomom nH oooon oMo3 .Emn ooo.m manHonnOo nooo .nonoOMd ooNHHHnnHOm omOHdo Inc Ioeao .ooNMHoHc Mo coHHoHoo orn Mo 1H1 oomo mcoHoMoo Modem 039 .nr H oH ono m.o MonMo MonoB MO momnono nnHz Mn N MOM Dov no Monoz nH ooumHoHo mo3 ono moMnooOOMm HonnoEHMomxm onn nH nonHMOmoo mo ooMomoMm mos nonnOMm ooNHHHnnHom omOHmnnov IDHIQ .omoanoom nnHB nonooMn mo3 ono oonooMnnn mo: nonn nonnOMo H ooNHHHnnHOm omOHmoHUVHIDHIQ Mo mEoMoOnoEOMnO nEnHOO OOHIm HoUIOHm .om oManm 133 om oManm mumsSz 20:05: 2 9:55. mmHnooOHooM MO >Mo>ooom .m nOHnnHom nOHnoHHHnnHom nH enH>HnooOHooM MOM oomommo oMo3 mnOHnooMM nEnHOO onn MO mnonoHHn .oonooHHOO oMo3 mnOHnooMM HE o.H ono Mn\HE om mos onoM 30HM nEnHoo one .m.m no .MoMMnn onoEMOM EanoEEo z mo.o nnHB oomoHo>oo ono nonoMnHHHnoo mo3 nonn AEO me x EoHo HonMonnH EO m.ov nESHOO omIm HooIOHm o no nonmoMmonoEOMno mo3 AH ommv nonoOMm ooNHHHnnHOm omOHmonUVHIDHIQ onn nnoEnooMn oooanoom MonMo .moMnnoOOMm HonnoEHMomxm onn nH nonHMomoo mo meow m MOM omoanOom nnHz nonooMn nonn mo3 AH: ome nH .Emo ooo.ovv onomeoHo one .Mn v MonMo omnono Mono3 onO nnHz Mn vH MOM Mono3 nH noueHoHo mos nonoOMm noNHHHnnHOm omOHmoHU Ioeno one .coHnoHOm Hdnnoo usedoo Mo vH H H: om ono nOHnoMomoMm onenno onoHDOHnMom MO H: OOH nonHonnOO oMnanE nOHnoooM onn nonn nmooxo moMnooOOMm HonnoEHMomxm onn nH nonHMomoo no noMomoMm moB nonoOMm ooNHHHnnHOm omOHmnmov IDHIQ .omoanoom nnHB oonooMn mo3 nonn nonoOMm H ooNHHHnnHOm omOHmoHUVHIDHIQ MO EoMmonoEOMnO nEnHOO omlm HooIOHm .Hm oManm 135 _. (J? —"——”'O”’ o m O/ > I] \3 _ H I o 3 ~- / N j f/‘L—o’c’ C:—— ~__ __1 :, '_”’JL 0 “—4 c c c l l E ‘ é (Nouovzu 83d woo) AllAllDVOIGVH 10 FRACTION NUMBER Figure 21 136 pH 1 as described in the Experimental Procedures and the hydrolysates were analyzed by paper chromatography with Solvent A. All of the radioactivity in the samples was present in D-[U-14C]apiose and D-[U-14C1xylose, however, the relative amounts of the two sugars varied. The 14C]xylose in amount of radioactivity present as D-[U- fractions 1, 2, and 3 was 13, 8, and 64%, respectively. In a second, similar experiment the amount of radio- 14 ,- Eli—“UL?“ r.— 'J‘ L" '- activity present as D-[U- C]xylose in fractions 1, 2, and 3 was 15, 10, and 28%, respectively. These results show that the small fragments of D-[U-14C]apiose solu- bilized product isolated after pectinase treatment were enriched in D-[U-14C]xylose. Hydrolysis of D-[U-14C]Galacturonic Acid SOlubilizedflPrOHuct In order to investigate the pectinase suscepti- bility of D-[U-14C]galacturonic acid solubilized product, a sample of this material was chromatographed on a Bio- Gel P-100 column and the radioactive material which eluted at V0 was isolated and concentrated. This material was divided into two portions; one of which was treated with pectinase while the other was untreated. The two samples were then chromatographed again on the Bio-Gel P-lOO column (Figure 22). Recovery of radio- active sample from the column was 87% for treated material and 54% for untreated material. Most of the 137 .nOHnooMM nooo nH nonooHHOO mo3 nOHnB mnH>Hnoo IoHooM ooMo>OooM HonOn MO nnoOMom onn nnomoMooM nwv mnH>HnooOHooM MO monHo> .oonooHHOo oMo3 mnOHnooMM HE H ono mH oManm MO onomoH onn nH nonHMomoo mo OOHIm HooIOHm no oonmoMmonoEOMno oMo3 monEom onn nOHnonoonH MonM< .Mn mH MOM erm no nononnOnH oMoB monnn nnom .m.o no .MoMMnn ononooo EnHoOm z m.o MO H1 QMH ooooo mos noonooMnnnv nOHnMom Monno onn oe .nH on ooooo HE\mE m MO noHnoMnnoO InOo o no omoanoom manHonnOo .m.v no .MoMMnn ononooo EnHoOm 2 m.o MO H: ooH non noonooan nOHnMom ono .naoo oomHv mnOHnMom H: oov Honoo m onnH nooH>Ho ono oomm no HE m.o on nonoMnnoonoo mo3 HoHMonoE onn mHmeHoHo MonM< .ooo no Mn N MOM 0mm nH noueHoHo nno ooanEOO oMo3 .O> onn on mnHonommoMMOo .HE om On «H MO moEnHo> nOHnnHo nH nonnHo nOHnB HoHMonoE one .oonooHHOO oMo3 mnoHnooMM HE m nonn nmooxo mH oManm Mo onomoH onn nH oonHMOmoo mo OOHIm HooIOHm MO nEnHOO o no nonmoMmonoEOMno mo3 AHE m.o nH .Emo ooe.mv nonoOMm ooNHHHnnHOm one .moMnooOOMm HonnoEHMomxm onn nH nonHMomon mo ooMomoMm mo3 nonoOMm ooNHHHnnHOm oHoo OHnOMnnooHoUHU IDHIQ .omoanoom HomnoM nnHB oonooMnnn ono nonooMn nonnOMm ooNHHHn «H InHOm UHoo OHnOMnnooHomHUVHIDHIQ MO mEoMmOnoEOMnO nEnHOO OOHIm HooIOHm .Nm oManm 138 LIJQ 23 25 :o: |._ 82 0.: J l O l-fi r-I (%) AIIAIIOVOICIVII 10 FRACTION NUMBER Figure 22 139 untreated material eluted in the V0 of the column while the pectinase treated material eluted at the V of the t column. These results indicate that D-[U-14C]galacturonic acid solubilized product was also capable of being degraded by pectinase. II— DISCUSSION Characterization of Solubilized Products Procedures have been developed for the charac- terization of radioactive polysaccharides synthesized with a particulate enzyme preparation. Radioactive 14C]Api," UDP- products were synthesized from "UDP[U- [U-14C]GaluA, UDP[U-14C]GlcUA, and UDP[U-14C1Xyl in large enough yields that the products could be par- tially characterized (Table 1). However, not all of the radioactivity in the reaction mixtures was incor- porated into product. I have not attempted to isolate or characterize the radioactive compounds in the reaction mixtures that were not incorporated into pro- duct. The inability of the particulate enzyme prepar- ation to incorporate all of the radioactive sugar into product under these reaction conditions is pre- sumably caused by rapid inactivation of enzymatic activity, metabolism of the sugar nucleotides by other enzymatic pathways, or an insufficient quantity of acceptor molecules for the transferase reactions or all or a combination of these. Glycosyl transferase activities in the particulate enzyme preparation from 140 141 E! minor are indeed unstable. Studies of the enzymes 14C]apiose and responsible for the synthesis of D-[U- D-[U-14C]galacturonic acid products by Pan, Leinbach and Kindel have shown that the particulate enzyme preparation lost 50% of both activities when stored for 6 min at 25°C (unpublished results). Despite the incomplete incorporation of radioactive sugars into 3- unn- Y-n‘ product the yields were sufficient to partially char- acterize the products. I have not characterized the insoluble radio- active material remaining after ammonium oxalate extraction of the products. In the case of D-[U-l4 C]- glucuronic acid and D-[U-14C]xylose products the insoluble radioactive material may be hemicelluloses since D-glucuronic acid and D-xylose are important constituents of hemicellulose polysaccharides. It is also possible that the nonsolubilized materials have structures identical to the solubilized products but that ammonium oxalate extraction did not solubilize them for unknown reasons. l4C]xylose and D-[U-14CJ- 14 The presence of D-[U- galacturonic acid in the D-[U- C]glucuronic acid indi- cated that the particulate enzyme preparation contained UDPGlcUA carboxy-lyase and UDPGlcUA 4-epimerase activi- ties. The absence of D-[U-14C]apiose in the D-[U-14C]- glucuronic acid solubilized product does not preclude 142 the existence of UDPGlcUA cyclase activity in the par- ticulate enzyme preparation, however. The pH optima for UDPGlcUA cyclase activity is 7.8 in potasium phos- phate buffer and the incorporation assays were performed at pH 6.1 (115). The absence of incorporation of D-[U-14C]glu- F“ curonic acid into solubilized product may explain why 14C]glucuronic the amount of radioactivity in the D-[U- acid product was less than for the other 3 products (Table 1) since before radioactivity could be incor- porated into solubilized product D-[U-14C]GlcUA in the 1 reaction mixture had to be converted to UDP[U- 4C]Xyl l4C]GalUA. and UDP U- I have not investigated whether the UDPGlcUA 4-epimerase and carboxy-lyase are membrane bound or in organelles or both. E° minor seems to be an excel- lent system for investigating Northcote's theory that the synthesis of polysaccharides is controlled in the golgi apparatus by control of the synthesis of the dif- ferent sugar nucleotides (33). Plant cell wall syn- thesis has the potential of being an important tool in studying the development of cell surfaces because of the change in the types of polysaccharides synthesized when primary cell wall synthesis is replaced by secondary cell wall synthesis. 143 The identity of the radioactive sugars contained in the insoluble material remaining after ammonium oxalate extraction was not determined. Other radio- active sugars such as D-[U--l 4C]glucuronic acid and L-[U-14C]arabinose may have been contained in this material. DEAE-Sephadex chromatography of the 4 solu- bilized products showed that they were all negatively charged since they were initially bound to the column (Figures 7, 8, and 10). This result was expected for the D-[U-l4 14 C]galacturonic acid and D-[U- C]glucuronic acid solubilized products since they both contained uronic acid sugars. However, since the D-[U-14C]apiose and D-[U-14C]xylose solubilized products were also bound by the DEAE-Sephadex column this suggests that they also contained uronic acid residues. Presumably the solubilized products were frac- tionated on the DEAR-Sephadex column according to their ratio of acidic to neutral sugars. The higher this ratio the higher the concentration of NaCl necessary to disassociate the solubilized product from the ion- exchange column. The column chromatograms indicate l4C]xylose solubilized that the D-[U-14C]apiose and D-[U- products contain less of the highly acidic material than does the solubilized products synthesized from the uronic acids (Figures 7, 8, and 10). Hart and 144 Kindel have reported that the polygalacturonic acid backbone of apiogalacturonan, obtained by mild acid hydrolysis of apiogalacturonan, was recovered after DEAF-Sephadex chromatography in a fraction which eluted from the column in 0.3 M NaCl (102). When the D—[U-14C1- galacturonic acid solubilized product was chromatographed on the DEAE-Sephadex column most of the radioactive material was recovered in fractions which eluted with NaCl concentrations of 0.25 M or less (Figure 8). This result suggests that the D-[U-14C]galacturonic acid solubilized product contains some neutral sugars. The fractions obtained from the DEAE-Sephadex chromatography of D—[U-14C]apiose solubilized product were not homogeneous as determined by rechromatography on DEAE-Sephadex (Table 8). The lack of homogeneity may have been caused by "degradation" as shown in Figure 16. Rechromatography did not, however, change the D-[U-14C]apiose content of the fractions recovered from fractions A, B, and D. The significance of the 14C]apiose content of the fractions change in D-[U- recovered from the rechromatography of fraction C is unknown. The polysaccharide nature of the solubilized products is evidenced by their high molecular weight as shown by their impermeability to dialysis membranes and the results obtained by gel chromatography of the 145 14 D-[U-14C]apiose and D-[U- C]galacturonic acid solu- bilized products. From the elution of the D-[U-14CI- 14C]galacturonic acid solubilized apiose and D-[U- products through a column of Bio-Gel P-300 the molecules had a disperse molecular weight range from at least 1 125,000 to 5,000 (Figure 11). The D-[U- 4C]galacturonic acid solubilized product contained lower molecular 14C]_ weight molecules than were contained in the D-[U- apiose solubilized product (Figure 13). These in yitrg synthesized pectic materials are especially suited for studying molecular size differences by gel chromatography because they are solubilized by relatively gentle tech- niques. However, the ammonium oxalate extraction pro- cedure may result in some breakdown (116). Villemez has described a procedure for the gel chromatography of the acetate derivatives of in yitrg synthesized [14C]g1uco- mannans (117). He resolved the [14C]glucomannan into two fractions; one with a minimum molecular weight of 200,000 and the other with a minimum molecular weight of 60,000. Identification of D-[U-14CJApiose Solubilized Prddhct as an Apiogalacturonan Although direct evidence for the identification of the D-[U-14C]apiose product as an apiogalacturonan was not obtained, there is an abundance of indirect evidence which confirms this conclusion. 146 D-[U-14C]Apiose solubilized product has many of the same properties as authentic apiogalacturonan isolated from intact plants. Like authentic apiogalacturonan, the D-[U-14C]- apiose product could be extracted by ammonium oxalate treatment (Table l). I have shown that the solubili- r= zation is dependent on the presence of ammonium oxalate i which is an indication of the pectic nature of the § 14 . D-[U- C]apiose product. The release of [U-14C]apiobiose from D-[U-14C]- s apiose solubilized product after hydrolysis at pH 4 (Figure 4) also shows that the solubilized product has a structure similar to apiogalacturonan (104). Hart and Kindel postulated that the cleavage of the glyco- sidic bond between the apiobiose side chains and the polygalacturonic acid backbone is the result of the transannular participation of the free carboxylic group of the D-galacturonic acid residue (104). Similar l4C]apiobiose from the solubilized pro- release of [U- ducts suggests a similar structure of a polygalacturonic acid backbone with apiobiose side chains. 1 l4C]galacturonic The D-[U- 4C]apiose and D-[U- acid solubilized products probably contain a backbone of a-l,4-galacturonan since they were both hydrolyzed by treatment with pectinase (Figures 20 and 22). It is not surprising that the D-[U-14C]apiose solubilized 147 product was not hydrolyzed completely since side chains of D-apiose are known to confer pectinase resistance on the polygalacturonic acid backbone of apiogalacturonans l (102, 120). The small fragments of D-[U- 4C]apiose solubilized product resulting from treatment with pec- tinase were found to be enriched in D-[U-14C]xylose F content (Figure 21). This result may be explained by 1 assuming that the D-[U- 4C]xylose residues are bound as 7.’ in... ".4 - side chains to the polygalacturonic acid backbone but do not confer resistance to pectinase hydrolysis. I‘ll» ‘1 ‘urli Therefore treatment with pectinase will result in the cleavage of the backbone near the point of D-[U-14C1- xylose attachment thus releasing small fragments of polysaccharide containing D-[U-14C]xylose. A similar release of small oligosaccharides containing D-xylose and D-galacturonic acid was reported when a pectic poly- saccharide isolated from Zosteraceae and containing D- galacturonic acid, D-xylose, D-apiose, and other neutral sugars was hydrolyzed with pectinase (120). As was the case with authentic apiogalacturonans l4C]apiose solubilized product from intact plants, D-[U- was fractionated by chromatography on a DEAE-Sephadex column (Figure 7). Additional evidence for the identification of 1 D-[U- 4C]apiose solubilized product as an apiogalacturonan is seen by the effect of adding UDPGalUA to the reaction 148 l4C]apiose product. mixture used to synthesize D-[U- Addition of UDPGalUA to the "UDP-[U-14C]Api" reaction mixture resulted in an increase in the incorporation of radioactive sugars into the product (Table 2), an l4C]apiose to D-[U-14CJ- increase in the ratio of D-[U- xylose (Table 4) an increase in susceptibility to hydrolysis at pH 4 (Table 5), a change in chromatography properties when chromatographed on DEAE-Sephadex (Figure 9), and an increase in the size of the molecules in the small molecular weight fraction (Figure 17). These changes indicate that addition of UDPGalUA to the reaction mixture resulted in the incorporation of D-[U-14C]apiose and D-galacturonic acid into the same molecules of polysaccharide. Additional galacturonans would be synthesized when UDPGalUA is present in the "UDP-[U-14C]Api" reaction mixture. The increase in incorporation of 14C]apiose product synthesized radioactivity into D-[U- in the presence of UDPGalUA (Table 2) could be explained by the presence of additional galacturonan acceptors for the incorporation of radioactive side chains. l4C]apiose The increase in the ratio of D-[U- to D-[U-14C]xylose seen in the D-[U-14C]apiose solu- bilized product could have resulted from the dilution of UDP-[U-14C]Xyl by UDPXyl synthesized in the reaction mixture from UDPGalUA. This conversion of UDPGalUA to In.- 149 UDPXyl is possible because of the presence of UDPGlcUA 4-epimerase and UDPGlcUA carboxy-lyase activities in the particulate enzyme preparation. However, the amount of conversion of UDPGalUA to UDPXyl cannot be large since the D-[U-14C]apiose product synthesized in the presence of UDPGalUA did not exhibit the lower amount of solubili- I. zation with ammonium oxalate treatment that was seen when D-[U-14C]apiose product was synthesized in the presence of UDPXyl. Also, there was little D-[U-14C]- l xylose found in D-[U- 4C]galacturonic acid solubilized product. Therefore, the decrease in content of D-[U-14C]xylose with addition of UDPGalUA to the reaction mixture may be caused instead by UDPGalUA effecting the control mechanisms for D-apiosyl and D-xylosyl transferase activities. Pan and Kindel (unpublished results) have found that addition of UDPGalUA to the reaction mixture used to synthesize D-[U-14C]apiose product resulted in an increased rate 1 of D-[U- 4C]apiose incorporation and a decreased rate of D-[U-14C]xylose incorporation. The increase in the release of D-[U-14 C]apiose and [U-14C]apiobiose after hydrolysis at pH 4 from D-[U-14C]apiose solubilized product synthesized in the presence of UDPGalUA (Table 5) may be the result of increased incorporation of D-galacturonic acid into the D-[U-14C]apiose containing polysaccharide thus 150 resulting in a more acidic polysaccharide which can better participate in the hydrolysis. It has been reasoned that if D-apiose and D- galacturonic acid are incorporated into the same poly- 1 saccharide then D-[U- 4C]apiose solubilized product syn- thesized in the presence of UDPGalUA should have a l r- higher ratio of D-galacturonic acid to D-[U- 4C]apiose then would D-[U-14C]apiose solubilized product synthesized ‘ “.St'1'\.~‘.)l‘",o'c’ e! in the absence of UDPGalUA. The polysaccharide with the higher ratio would be more acidic than the other. '— As determined by DEAR-Sephadex chromatography, D-[U-l4clapiose solubilized product synthesized in the presence of UDPGalUA was more acidic than the product synthesized without UDPGalUA (Figures 7 and 9). The more acidic polysaccharides elute from the DEAE- Sephadex column in fractions D and E. Twenty-three per- cent of the recovered radioactivity was contained in 14C]apiose solu- these 2 fractions combined when D-[U- bilized product synthesized in the absence of UDPGalUA was chromatOgraphed. Sixty percent of the recovered radioactivity was contained in fractions D and E combined when D-[U-14C1apiose solubilized product synthesized in the presence of UDPGalUA was chromatographed. The increase in the amount of highly acidic polysaccharide fraction was dependent on the amount of UDPGalUA added to the reaction mixture (Table 6). 151 When I first saw the change that addition of UDPGalUA to the reaction mixture caused in the chroma- tography of D-[U-14C]apiose solubilized product on the DEAF-Sephadex column, I thought that a galacturonan may have been synthesized from UDPGalUA which then complexed with the D-[U-14C]apiose solubilized product. The change in the elution profile would have then been caused by l4C]apiose product the galacturonan dragging the D-[U- with it rather than the D-galacturonic acid being incorporated into the D-[U-14C]apiose solubilized pro- duct. This theory is incorrect, however, since mixing galacturonan synthesized from UDPGalUA with D-[U-14C]- apiose solubilized product did not change the elution profile of D-[U-l4 C]apiose solubilized product on the DEAR-Sephadex column. Characterization and comparison of the DEAE- l4C]apiose solu- Sephadex fractions obtained from D—[U- bilized product synthesized in the absence and presence of UDPGalUA showed that UDPGalUA affected the D-[U-14C]- l4C]xylose ratio and susceptibility to apiose/D-[U- hydrolysis at pH 4 of corresponding fractions (Table 7). These results show that the higher the D-[U-14C]xylose content of a fraction the lower the acidity was as determined by elution order from the DEAE-Sephadex column. Fraction D eluted from the DEAF-Sephadex column in a similar position in the gradient as the 152 22° sodium chloride soluble apiogalacturonan IIa fraction characterized by Hart and Kindel (102). When hydrolyzed at pH 4 this authentic apiogalacturonan totally released its D-apiose (104). In the case of fraction D obtained from D-[U-14 C]apiose solubilized product synthesized in the presence of UDPGalUA 81% of the incorporated D-[U-14CJ- apiose was released after hydrolysis at pH 4 (Table 7). This shows that fraction D has similar hydrolysis properties at pH 4 to the authentic apiogalacturonan fraction. Although Hart and Kindel did not find D-xylose in the apiogalacturonans that they isolated from the cell wall of E. minor (102), I was able to demonstrate l4C]xylose by hydrolysis at pH 1 the existance of D-[U- in the [14C]60° sodium chloride soluble apiogalacturonan fraction isolated by them. D-Xylose seems to be a normal constituent of the apiogalacturonan fractions isolated at higher temperatures as evidenced by these results and those of Beck (103) albeit D-xylose is not contained in the fractions isolated by ammonium oxalate extraction at 22°C. Beck was unable to establish whether D-apiose and D-xylose were contained in his 60°C extract as separate apiogalacturonan and xylogalacturonan poly- saccharides or as an apioxylogalacturonan (103). He did suggest that both pentoses were contained in the 153 same polysaccharide because the D-xylose and D-apiose containing polysaccharides were not separated from one another by DEAE-Cellulose chromatography (103). The characterization experiments performed with D-[U-14C]- apiose solubilized product also did not determine whether D-[U-l 4C]xylose and D-[U-14C]apiose were F incorporated in vitro into the same polysaccharide. However, I was unable to completely separate incor- l porated D-[U-14C]apiose from D-[U- 4C]xylose by DEAE- Sephadex chromatography (Tables 7 and 8) and this also suggests that both pentoses were incorporated into the same molecules. A possible experimental approach to answer this question would be to prepare an affinity column for D-apiose using an antibody specific for this sugar. If the D-[U-14C]apiose and D-[U-14C1xylose incorporated in the D-[U-l4 C]apiose solubilized product were contained in different polysaccharide molecules than the D-apiose affinity column would bind the D-[U-14C1apiose containing material but not the D-[U-14C]xylose containing material. Evidence that D-[U-14C]xylose was incorporated into the apiogalacturonan molecules, however, is seen from the effect that the presence of UDPXyl in the reaction mixtures used to synthesize D-[U-14 C]apiose product has on the properties of the resultant product. The changes seen when UDPGlcUA was added are also 154 probably due in part by incorporation of D-xylose because of the presence of UDPGlcUA carboxy-lyase activity in the particulate enzyme preparation. There is less conversion of UDPGlcUA to UDPGalUA in the reaction mixture than there is conversion to UDPXyl as shown by the larger quantity of D-[U--14 1 C]xylose as compared to D-[U- 4C]galacturonic acid contained in the D-[U-l4 C]glucuronic acid solubilized product. Addition of UDPGlcUA and UDPXyl to the reaction mixtures used to synthesize D-[U-14C]apiose product resulted in a decreased solubilization of radioactive material by ammonium oxalate extraction (Table 2). Addition of these nonradioactive sugar nucleotides may have promoted the synthesis of a D-apiose containing polysaccharide which was not a pectin. Approximately 80% of the D-apiose in the cell wall of E. minor was not extracted by ammonium oxalate and the structure of this D-apiose-containing material is unknown (102). The large amount of D-[U-l4 C]apiose product synthesized in the presence of UDPXyl which was not solubilized by ammonium oxalate treatment may indicate that the cell wall of E. miggg contains an apioxylan. However, the ammonium oxalate solubilized and nonsolubilized materials may also have the same structure except that the nonsolubilized material has more D-xylose in the side chains. The D-xylose side chains for unknown 155 reasons may cause the polysaccharide to be less sus- ceptible to solubilization by ammonium oxalate. Addition of UDPXyl to the reaction mixture would increase the number of D-xylose side chains in the product and thus decrease the amount of material solu- bilized. This last possibility agrees with the obser- vation that D-xylose containing polysaccharides were extracted from the cell wall of E. miggg only at higher temperatures (103). When hydrolyzed at pH 4 D-[U-14C]apiose solu- bilized product, synthesized in the presence of l4C]apiose UDPXyl, released a larger amount of D-[U- as D-[U-14C]apiose than did D-[U-14C]apiose solubilized product synthesized in the absence of nonradioactive sugar nucleotide (Table 5). There was no increase in the amount of [U-1 4C]apiobiose released. This suggests that D-xylose was incorporated into the polysaccharide and this affected the hydrolysis at pH 4 in a presently unknown manner. The experimental results described above all show that an apiogalacturonan, containing some D-xylose side chains, can be synthesized with the particulate enzyme preparation from E. miggg. However, the results 14C]apiose solu- obtained from hydrolyzing the D—[U- bilized product at pH 4 are not exactly the same as was obtained by Hart and Kindel (104) with authentic 156 apiogalacturonans. When they hydrolyzed an apiogalac- turonan fraction, which had been purified by DEAE- Sephadex chromatography, at pH 4 all of D-apiose was released from the polysaccharide and recovered as apiobiose (104). On the other hand, I was unable to obtain total release of D-[U-14C]apiose from any of the fractions of D-[U-14C]apiose solubilized product by hydrolysis at pH 4 (Tables 5 and 7). I also found 1 that the ratio of [U-14C]apiobiose to D-[U- 4C]apiose 14C]apiose solu- released from the fractions of D-[U- bilized product was lower than was reported by Hart and Kindel (104). However, hydrolysis of the [14C]- 22°C and 60°C sodium chloride soluble apiogalacturonan fractions of Hart and Kindel at pH 4 also resulted in 14C]apiose from the polysac- incomplete release of D-[ charides (Hart and Kindel, unpublished results). In the case of the [14C]60°C sodium chloride soluble l4C]apiose apiogalacturonan fraction only 41% of the D-[ was released from the polysaccharide after a 3 hr hydrolysis period and the ratio of [14C]apiobiose to D_[14 C]apiose was 2.7 (Hart and Kindel, unpublished results). This may indicate that the completeness of hydrolysis at pH 4 may depend on small differences in structure or preparation of apiogalacturonan. Some of the D-[U-14C]apiose may be contained in the solu- bilized product as monosaccharide side chains. 157 Possible Mechanisms of Synthesis I do not know whether apiogalacturonans were synthesized d3 2232 by the particulate enzyme prepar- ation from E. miggg. However, the amount of radio- activity contained in the largest molecules of D-[U-l4C]- galacturonic acid increased as the reaction mixture was Fe incubated for longer periods of time (Figure 18). One 1 interpretation of this is that more than one D-[U- 4C]- galacturonic acid residue was incorporated into each 1 molecule of D-[U- 4C]galacturonic acid solubilized Jill-Wu”! "Kl _" , Z." O- product. In order to determine whether dg’ggyg syn- thesis has occurred additional experiments will have to be performed to determine whether the reducing ends and interior residues of the D-[U-14C]galacturonic acid solubilized product were synthesized £2.2i2523 There is a second interpretation for the results shown in Figure 18. It is still possible to incorporate a single D-[U-14C]galacturonic acid residue into pre- formed chains and obtain an increase in the relative amount of radioactivity into the large molecular weight fraction with increasing synthesis times if the rate of incorporation into large chains is faster than into small chains. There are at least 2 possible mechanisms for synthesis of apiogalacturonans. The first mechanism is similar to one seen in bacterial systems where an 158 oligosaccharide-repeating unit containing D-apiose and D-galacturonic acid is first synthesized as part of a lipid intermediate and then transferred to the growing polysaccharide (78). This mechanism allows for a highly uniform structure. A second mechanism of synthesis is that the polygalacturonic acid backbone be synthesized first after which the pentose sugar side chains are incorporated. This mechanism is similar to the one found for the methylation of pectins (74, 75). H- Based on the gel chromatography experiments some proposals about the mechanism of apiogalacturonan synthesis can be made. Since D-[U-14C]apiose is incor- porated in the absence of exogenous UDPGalUA and the D-[U-14C]galacturonic acid solubilized product is smaller than the D-[U-14C]apiose solubilized product (Table 13), it is doubtful that synthesis occurs by means of an apiogalacturonasyl lipid intermediate. Therefore synthesis most likely occurs by the formation of the polygalacturonic acid backbone followed by incorporation of the D-apiose side chains. Such a synthesis mechanism can be used to explain why the percent of D-[U-14C]apiose solubilized product of high molecular weight decreased when the incubation times were increased from 0.5 to 15 min (Figure 19) even 14 though in the case of D-[U- C]galacturonic acid 159 solubilized product the percent of high molecular weight material increased as the length of incubation increased (Fraction 18). At the beginning of the £2 vitro incor- l poration of D-[U- 4C]apiose the largest molecules of polygalacturonic acid are probably used preferentially as acceptor molecules for D--[U--l 4C]apiose transfer. Fe As the incorporation reaction proceeds then the smaller molecules of polygalacturonic acid would act as acceptors and thus increase the fraction of lower molecular weight D-[U-14C]apiose solubilized product. winning". . 1.92... An alternate explanation for the results shown in Figure 19 is that there is a degradative enzyme in the particulate enzyme preparation which hydrolyzes the backbone of the galacturonan acceptor. Therefore, initially the D-[U-14C]apiose side chains were incor- porated into large molecular weight polysaccharides, but as the synthesis reaction proceeded, the apiogalacturonans and the galacturonan acceptors would be cleaved into smaller pieces by the degradative enzyme. This theory l4C]galacturonan is unlikely, however, since the D-[U— did not show evidence of being cleared during synthesis (Figure 18). As discussed previously the D-[U-14C]galac- turonic acid solubilized product probably contains neutral sugar side chains. Some of these neutral sugar side chains may be the result of the conversion 160 of UDP[U-14C]GalUA to UDP[U-14C]Xyl. A second possi- bility is that the particulate enzyme preparation con- tains acceptor molecules for D-galacturonic acid transfer which contain neutral sugars. This suggests that apiogalacturonan synthesis occurs by alternating periods of backbone elongation with periods of incor- poration of the side chains. I do not know if the par- -_. ‘fii ticulate enzyme preparation contains nonradioactive sugar nucleotides when isolated. If it did this would 4 also explain why the D-[U--l C]galacturonic acid solu- ‘7 bilized product contains neutral sugars. Since both residues in [U-14C]apiobiose were incorporated 12.21EE2 this suggests that incorporation of the two D-[U-14C]apiose residues of the disaccharide into the apiogalacturonan occurred simultaneously. Otherwise some of the [U-14C]apiobiose molecules would have contained an 12.2122 synthesized D-apiose moiety at the reducing end of the disaccharide. A reaction mechanism involving incorporation of intact apiobiose residues through a lipid intermediate could account for these results. Pan and Kindel were unable to isolate a D-[U-14C1apiose containing lipid intermediate from this system, however (unpublished results). A second mechanism can be imagined where the polygalacturonic acid acceptor was bound to an enzyme complex containing 2 apiosyl transferase enzymes. The first transferase 161 would transfer D-apiose to a D-galacturonic acid residue in the backbone. The second transferase would imme- diately transfer another D-apiose to the first apiosyl residue. Degradation of D-[U-14C]Apiose and D-TU-15C]Galacturonic Acid Solubilized Products 1 The mechanism by which D-[U- 4C]apiose and D-[U-14C]galacturonic acid solubilized products were "degraded" by dialysis in water or by chromatography on DEAE-Sephadex is unknown (Figures 14 and 16). Any possible mechanism must be able to account for the absence of "degradation" when the solubilized products were dialyzed in sodium phosphate buffer (Figure 14). The mechanism would also have to explain why dialysis in water does not "degrade" fractions of solubilized products that have been chromatographed on a column of Bio-Gel equilibrated with sodium phosphate buffer. The "degradative" process may indicate that the solubilized product consists of aggregates of non- covalently bound polysaccharide molecules which are disassociated by dialysis in water or by DEAE-Sephadex chromatography. However, this hypothesis seems questionable since the "degradation" was not reversed by dialysis in sodium phosphate buffer. Also this hypothesis does not explain why solubilized product 162 recovered after gel chromatography was not degraded by water dialysis (Figure 15). If the solubilized products are in solution as single molecules then "degradation" may result from the enzymatic cleavage of glycosidic bonds. However, the inactivation of such enzymes by sodium phosphate buffer is hard to understand. Another possible expla- nation for the "degradation" mechanism is that during dialysis in water or chromatography on DEAR-Sephadex the larger molecules of solubilized product were selectively lost. The decrease in the amount of radioactive material contained in the V0 of the gel chromatography column after dialysis or DEAR-Sephadex chromatography would be caused by this selective loss of large molecular weight material. The amount of radioactive material not recovered after dialysis or DEAE-Sephadex chromatography is large enough to support this mechanism although it too is highly speculative. An understanding of this "degradation" process may be important in the study of cell wall structure. This is especially true in the light of recent models of cell wall structure based on extensive cross linking of polysaccharides and proteins (21). 1 14 I do not know whether the D-[U- C]apiose and 1 D-[U- 4C]galacturonic acid solubilized products used in the gel-chromatography experiments were degraded 163 during the solubilization procedure with ammonium oxalate. Such degradation of pectic polysaccharides by ammonium oxalate treatment has been reported (116). Initial experiments by Leinbach and Kindel suggest that l4C]galacturonic acid product with extraction of D-[U- sodium hexametaphosphate rather than ammonium oxalate I resulted in a greater percentage of the radioactivity I being isolated in the V0 when chromatographed on a Bio- Gel P-300 column (Leinbach and Kindel, unpublished results). Apiogalacturonans are not methyl esterifred (102) so that degradation of the solubilized products by B-elimination is not probable. It is possible that as polysaccharides were syn- thesized in the particulate enzyme preparation they were also degraded enzymatically. This possibility was not investigated and finding proper control experi- ments for such an investigation is not practical. The obvious experiment of isolating solubilized product, determining its molecular weight distribution by chromatographing a portion on a gel chromatography column, incubating the rest of the solubilized product with particulate enzyme preparation, and then rechroma- tographing on the gel chromatography column to see if there is any change in the molecular weight distribution is not valid. This is true because the polysaccharide may be synthesized within a membrane-bound organelle (7S). 164 Addition of isolated solubilized product to the par- ticulate enzyme preparation will not result in the polysaccharide being in the same environment as it was synthesized in since it will not be able to pene- trate the lipid membrane. This is important because the organelle may protect the newly synthesized poly- saccharide from degradative enzymes in the cytoplasm or in other organelles. Addition of isolated solu- bilized product to the particulate enzyme preparation may result in the exposure of the product to degradative enzymes that it would normally be protected from before extraction from the reaction mixture or vice versa. Summary I have shown that the particulate enzyme prepar- ation from E. miggg is capable of synthesizing D-apiose and D-galacturonic acid containing polysaccharides with structures similar to the apiogalacturonan components of the cell wall. The iEIXiEEE synthesized apiogalac- turonans seem to contain side chains of D-xylose also. Studies with E. EEBQE on the cell-free incorporation of D-[U-14C]apiose and D-[U-l4 C]galacturonic acid, from their respective sugar nucleotides, into polysaccharides can be done with the knowledge that an actual component of the plant cell wall is synthesized. In addition I have shown that the synthesis of cell wall polysaccharides in the particulate enzyme preparation from E. minor is 165 an integrated system where the products formed are influenced by the Species and relative amounts of sugar nucleotides present in the reaction mixture. The results of several experiments have allowed for the proposal of a tentative mechanism of apiogalac- turonan synthesis where the backbone of polygalacturonic acid is synthesized first from UDPGalUA after which the D-apiose containing side chains are added. LIST OF REFERENCES “.1330.” ‘- '- '! 10. 11. 12. LIST OF REFERENCES Mascaro, L., and Kindel, P. K. (1974) Fed. Proc. 33, 1445. Aspinqll, G. O. (1970) in The Carbohydrates (Pigman, W., and Horton, D., eds.), Vol. IIB, pp. 515-536, Academic Press, New York. Stoddart, R. W., Barrett, A. J.p and Northcote, D. H. (1967) Biochem. J. 102, 194-204. Stoddart, R. W., and Northcote, D. H. (1967) Biochem. g. 105, 45-59. Whistler, R. L., and Richards, E. L. (1970) in The Carboh drates (Pigman, W., and Horton, D., eds.), V01. IIA, pp. 447-469, Academic Press, New York. Katz, M., and Ordin, L. (1967) Biochim. Bigphys. Acta 141, 126-134. Kivelaan, A., Bandurski, R. S., and Schulze, A. (1971) Plant Physiol. fig, 389-393. Lamport, D. T. A., and Northcote, D. H. (1960) Nature 188, 665-666. Lamport, D. T. A. (1965) in Advances in Botanical Research (Preston, R. D., ed.), Vol. 2, pp. 151- 218, Academic Press, New York. Lamport, D. T. A. (1969) Biochemistryg, 1155-1163. Lamport, D. T. A. (1970) in Ann. Rev. Plant Physiol. (Machlis, L., ed.), Vol. 21, pp. 235-270) Annual Reviews Inc., Palo Alto. Lamport, D. T. A. (1973) in Biogenesis of Plant Cell Wall Polysaccharides (Loewus, F.,FEH.), pp. 149- 164, Academic Press, New York. 166 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. 27. 28. 167 Timell, T. E. (1965) in Cellular Ultrastructure of Woody Plants (Cote, W. A., Jr., ed.), pp. 127- 156, Syracuse University Press, Syracuse. Shafizadeh, F., and McGinnis, G. D. (1971) in Adv. Carbohydrate Chem. and Biochem. (Tipson, R. 8., ed.), V61. 267'pp. 297-349, Academic Press, New York. Thornber, J. P., and Northcote, D. H. (1961) Muhlethaler, K. (1965) in Cellular Ultrastructure of Woody Plants (Cote, W. A., Jr., edf), pp. 191- 198, Syracuse University Press, Syracuse. Mark, R. (1965) in Cellular Ultrastructure of Woody T Plants (Cote, W. A., Jr., ed.), pp. 493-533, 5 Syracuse University Press, Syracuse. Marx-Figini, M., and Schulz, G. V. (1966) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 112, 81-101. '" Talmadge, K. W., Keegstra, K., Bauer, W. D., and Albersheim, P. (1973) Plant Physiol. 51, 158-173. Bauer, W. D., Talmadge, K. W., Keegstra, K., and Albersheim, P. (1973) Plant Physiol. EE, 174-187. Keegstra, K., Talmadge, K. W., Bauer, W. D., and Albersheim, P. (1973) Plant Physiol. EE, 188-196. Wilder, B. M., and Albersheim, P. (1973) Plant Physiol. 2E, 889-893. Pickett-Heaps, J. D., and Northcote, D. H. (1966) Jo cello SC]... -1_' 109-120. Whaley, W. G., and Mollenhauer, H. H. (1963) Whaley, W. G., Dauwalder, M., and Kiphart, J. E. (1966) J. Ultrastructure Res. EE, 169-180. Frey-Wyssling, A., Lopez-Saez, J. F., and Mfihlethaler, K. (1964) J. Ultrastructure Res. E2. 422-432. Northcote, D. H., and Pickett-Heaps, J. D. (1966) Biochem J. 2g, 159-167. ' Wooding, F. B. P. (1968) J. Cell Sci. 3, 71-80. 29. 30. 31. 32. 33. 34. 35. 36. 37. 38. 39. 40. 41. 42. 43. 44. 45. 46. 168 Bowles, D. J., and Northcote, D. H. (1972) Biochem. g. 130, 1133-1145. Harris, P. J., and Northcote, D. H. (1971) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 237, 56-64. Dashek, W. V., and Rosen, W. G. (1965) Plant Physiol. 19 Sup. XXXIX. Villemez, C. L., McNab, J. M., and Albersheim, P. (1968) Nature 218, 878-880. Northcote, D. H. (1968) in Plant Cell Organelles (Pridham, J. B., ed.), pp. 179-197, Academic Press, New York. Zetsche, K. (1966) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 124, 332-338. Ledbetter, M. C., and Porter, M. D. (1963) J. Cell. Biol. E2, 239-250. Hepler, P. K., and Nowcomb, E. H. (1964) J. Cell. Biol. g9, 529-533. Streiblova, E. (1968) J. Bacteriol. 32, 700-707. Moor, H., and Mfihlethaler, K. (1963) J. Cell Biol. £1, 609-628. Robinson, D. G., and Preston, R. D. (1972) Planta Brown, R. M., Jr., Franke, W. W., Kleinig, H. F., and Sitte, P. (1970) J. Cell. Biol. 32. 246-271. Hassid, W. Z. (1969) Science 165, 137-144. Feingold, D. S., Neufeld, E. F., and Hassid, W. Z. (1958) J. Biol. Chem. 233, 783-788. Currier, H. B. (1957) Amer. J. Bot. 11, 478-488. Villemez, C. L., Franz, G., and Hassid, W. Z. (1967) Plant Physiol. 13, 1219-1223. Brummond, D. 0., and Gibbons, A. P. (1964) Biochem. Eiopgys. Res. Commun. El, 156-159. Flowers, H. M., Batra, K. K., Kemp, J., and Hassid, W. Z. (1968) Plant Physiol. 33, 1703-1709. 47. 48. 49. SO. 51. 52. 53. 54. 55. 56. 57. 58. 59. 60. 61. 62. 63. 64. 169 Clark, A. F., and Villemez, C. L. (1972) Plant Physiol. £2, 371-374. Ordin, L., and Hall, M. A. (1968) Plant Physiol. 11, 473-476. Tsai, C. M., and Hassid, W. Z. (1973) Plant Physiol. EE, 998-1001. Péaud-Lenvel, C., and Axelos, M. (1970) FEBS Letters g, 224-228. Smith, M. M., and Stone, B. A. (1973) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 313, 72-94. Ray, P. M., Shininger, T. L., and Ray, M. M. (1969) Biochemistry_§i, 605-612. Van Der Woude, W. J., Lembi, C. A., and Morré, D. J. (1974) plant Physiol. 25, 333-340. Elbein, A. D., Barber, G. A., and Hassid, W. z. Barber, G. A., Elbein, A. D., and Hassid, W. Z. Elbein, A. D. (1969) J. Biol. Chem. 244, 1608-1616. Flowers, H. M., Batra, K. K., Kemp, J., and Hassid, W. Z. (1969) J. Biol. Chem. 244, 4969-4974. Villemez, C. L. (1971) Biochem. J. 121, 151-157. Barber, G. A., and Hassid, W. Z. (1965) Nature 207, 295-296. Marx-Figini, M. (1966) Nature 210, 754-755. Delmer, D. P., Beasley, C. A., and Ordin, L. (1974) Plant Physiol. E3, 149-153. Robinson, D. G., and Preston, R. D. (1972) Biochim. BiOphys. Acta 273, 336-345. Muhlethaler, K. (1949) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 3, Colvin, J. R. (1959) Nature 183, 1135-1136. I»: a 0‘ ‘ -1. fin'hr Fun. ‘1' run..- 65. 66. 67. 68. 69. 70. 71. 72. 73. 74. 75. 76. 77. 78. 79. 80. 81. 170 Minor, F. W., Greathouse, G. A., Shirk, H. G., Schwartz, A. M., and Harris, M. (1954) J. Am. Chem. Soc. 19' 1658-1661. Glaser, L. (1958) J. Biol. Chem. 232, 627-636. Kauss, H. (1967) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 148, 572-574.. Kauss, H., and Hassid, W. Z. (1967) J. Biol. Chem. Pridham, J. B., and Hassid, W. Z. (1966) Biochem. J. 100, 21P. Bailey, R. W., and Hassid, W. Z. (1966) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S. E2, 1586-1593. McNab, J. M., Villemez, C. L., and Albersheim, P. (1968) Biochem. J. 106, 355-360. Villemez, C. L., Swanson, A. L., and Hassid, W. Z. (1966) Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 116, 446-452. Liu, T. Y., Elbein, A. D., and Su, J. C. (1966) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. E, 650-657. Kauss, H., and Hassid, W. Z. (1967) J. Biol. Chem. Kauss, H., Swanson, A. L., Arnold, R., and Odzuck, W. (1969) Biochim. Bigpgys. Acta 192, 55-61. Villemez, C. L., Liu, T. Y., and Hassid, W. Z. (1965) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S. 21, 1626-1632. Macmillan, J. D., Phaff, H. J., and Vaughn, R. H. (1964) Biochemistgy 2, 572-578. Lennarz, W. J., and Scher, M. G. (1972) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 265, 417-441. Kjosbakken, J., and Colvin, J. R. (1973) in Eig- genesis of Plant Cell Wall Polysaccharides (Loewusi:F., edi), pp.*361-37l, Academic Press, New York. Jung, P., and Tanner, W. (1973) Eur. J. Biochem. 37, 1-6. Babczinski, P., and Tanner, W. (1973) Biochem. Biopgys. Res. Commun. E1. 1119-1124. 82. 83. 84. 85. 86. 87. 88. 89. 90. 91. 92. 93. 94. 95. 96. 97. 98. 99. 171 Kauss, H. (1969) FEBS Letters 2, 81-84. Villemez, C. L., and Clark, A. F. (1969) Biochem. BiOphys. Res. Commun. fig. 57-63. Villemez, C. L. (1970) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. ‘12, 636-641. Storm, D. L., and Hassid, W. Z. (1972) Plant Alam, S. S., Barr, R. M., Richards, J. B., and Hemming, F. W. (1971) Biochem. J. 121, 19P. Clark, A. F., and Villemez, C. L. (1973) FEBS Letters 22, 84-86. Forsee, W. T., and Elbein, A. D. (1973) J. Biol. Chem. 248, 2858-2867. Tsai, C. M., and Hassid, W. Z. (1971) Plant Physiol. 11, 740-744. Liu, T. Y., and Hassid, W. Z. (1970) J. Biol. Chem. 245, 1922-1925. Heller, J. S., and Villemez, C. L. (1972) Biochem. J. 128, 243-252. Vongerichten, E. (1901) Ann. Chem. 218, 121-136. Sandermann, A., and Grisebach, H. (1970) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 208, 173-180. Hudson, C. S. (1949) in Advances in Carbohydrate Chem. (Pigman, W. W., and Wolfrom, M. L., eds.), Vol. 4, pp. 57-74, Academic Press, New York. Hart, D. A. (1969) Ph.D. Thesis, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan. Bell, J. D., Isherwood, F. A., and Hardwick, N. E. (1954) J. Chem. Soc., 3702-3706. Bacon, J. S. D. (1963) Biochem. J. fig. 103P. Ovoda, R. G., Vaskovsky, V. B., Ovodov, Y. S. (1968) Carbohyd. Res. g, 328. Williams, D. T., and Jones, J. K. N. (1964) Can. J. Chem. 1E, 69-72. 100. 101. 102. 103. 104. 105. 106. 107. 108. 109. 110. 111. 112. 113. 114. 115. 116. 117. 172 Beck, E., and Kandler, O. (1965) Z. Naturforsh ZOB, 62-67. Duff, R. B. (1965) Biochem. J. 21, 768-772. Hart, D. A., and Kindel, P. K. (1970) Biochem. J. 116, 569-579. Beck, E. (1967) Z. Pflanzenphysiol. Bd. El, 444-461. Hart, D. A., and Kindel, P. K. (1970) Biochemistgy 2, 2190-2196. Sandermann, H., Tisue, G. T., and Grisebach, H. (1968) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 165, 550-552. Kindel, P. K., and Watson, R. R. (1973) Biochem. J. 133, 227-241. Gustine, D. L., and Kindel, P. K. (1969) J. Biol. Chem. 244, 1382-1385. Kindel, P. K., Gustine, D. L., and Watson, R. R. (1971) Fed. Proc. 29, 1117. Kindel, p. K. (1973) in Biogenesis of plant Cell Wall Polysaccharides (Loewus, F., ed.), PP. 85- 94, Academic Press, New York. Pan, Y. T. (1974) Fed. Proc. 32, 1445. Bray, G. A. (1960) Anal. Biochem. E, 279-285. Partridge, S. M. (1949) Nature, Lond., 164, 443. Trevelyan, W. E., Procter, D. P., and Harrison, J. W. (1950) Nature, Lond., 166, 444-445. Anderson, D. M. W., and Stoddart, J. F. (1966) Carbohydrate Res. 2. 104-114. Gustine, D. L., Yuan, D. H., and Kindel, P. K. (1975) Arch. Biochem. BiOphys., in press. Anderson, D. M. W., Bews, A. M., Garbutt, S., and King, N. J. (1961) J. Chem. Soc., 5230-5234. Villemez, C. L. (1974) Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 165, 407-412. 173 118. Vongerichten, E., (1902) Ann. Chem., 321, 71-83. 119. Leinbach, E. L., and Kindel, P. K. (1974) Abstracts of Papers, 168th National Meeting, Biol. 149, American Chemical Society, Washington, D. C. 120. Ovodou, Y. 8., Ovodovo, R. G., Bondarenko, D. D., and Krasikovo, I. N. (1971) Carbohydrate Res. Lg, 311-318. rs! .M 4.5.153. $le any“, . ,