EHEMIQAI. AND PHYSICAL CHARACTERIZATION OF EDP-GLUCOSE PYRGPHOSPHORYLASE FROM GALF LIVER Thesis for #213 Degree of Ph. D. MESHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY SIEVEN LEVINE . 1959' 1.455935 LIB.pAPY Michigan State University This is to certify that the thesis entitled CHEMICAL AND PHYSICAL CHARACTERIZATION OF UDP-GLUCOSE PYROPHOSPHORYLASE FROM CALF LIVER presented by STEVEN LEVINE has been accepted towards fulfillment of the requirements for PhoDo degree in BIOCHE‘AIS TRY 2 ' /" // é/ //¢éfl , Date S EFT Ell'fl 0-169 yew I "* “‘1' if?“ ' n» 'Mfi’gg‘hflfi) '7/ /;} /A’f{[ {‘J ABSTRACT CHEMICAL AND PHYSICAL CHARACTERIZATION OF UDP-GLUCOSE PYROPHOSPHORYLASE FROM CALP LIVER By Steven Levine Uridine diphosphate glucose, which is formed from glucose- l-phosphate and uridine triphosphate with the concomitant liberation of inorganic pyrophosphate, is an extremely important intermediate in carbohydrate metabolism. The crystallization of uridine diphosphate glucose perphosphorylase, an enzyme that catalyzes the above transformation, has afforded an opportunity to study the relationship of its structure to its function. The physical and chemical characterization of this protein is the - purpose of this research. The pyrophosphorylase was found to be a large polydisperse enzyme composed of large discrete subunits. The optical properties, renaturation tendency, chemical composition, and subunit structure of the enzyme were also determined. CHEMICAL AND PHYSICAL CHARACTERIZATION OF UDP-GLUCOSE PYROPHOSPHORYLASE PROM CALF LIVER By Steven Levine A THESIS Submitted to Michigan State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Department of Biochemistry 1969 4) ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The author wishes to express his appreciation to Dr. R. G. Hansen without whose guidance and inspiration this work could not have been completed. Thanks are also extended to Dr. Pat Oriel of Dow Chemical Company for performing the optical rotatory dispersion experiments and for his assistance in the interpretation of the data. Acknowledgement is made to Dr. Bill Rutter for allowing us the use of his laboratory to perform the electrofocusing experiments. Acknowledgement is also made to Miss Doris Bauer for her aid in the amino acid analysis. The author also wishes to thank Dr. w. C. Deal for his help with the analytical ultracentrifuge experiments. Special thanks are extended to Dr. w. A. Wood whose interest in the author and his work is greatly appreciated. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Page INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 LITERATURE REVIEW . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 Materials and Methods . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . lO Reagents . . . . . . lO Spectrophotometry. and Measurement of Enzyme Activity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . lO Absorption Spectroscopy . . . . . 10 Determination of the Extinction Coefficient . Carbohydrate Content . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . l2 Ultracentrifugation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 Optical Rotatory Dispersion . . . . . . l5 Titration of Cysteine Residues with Ellman‘ s Reagent (DTNB) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 Titration of Cysteine Residues with p- Mercuribenzoate (PMB) . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 Amino Acid Analysis . . . . . . . . . l9 Electrophoresis on Cellulose Acetate Strips . . . 22 Isoelectric Focusing . . . . . . . . . 22 Trypsin Digestion and Peptide Mapping . . . . . . 25 Cyanogen Bromide Cleavage . . . . . . . . . . 25 Subunit Reassociation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26 RESULTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 Absorption Spectra . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2T Extinction Coefficient . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 Carbohydrate Content . . . . . . 27 Homogeneity and Molecular Weight of the Enzyme by Sedimentation and Diffusion Techniques . . . . 30 Molecular Weight of the Native Enzyme by the Sedimen— tation Equilibrium Technique . . . . . . 39 Homogeneity and Molecular Weight of the Subunits by Sedimentation, Diffusion, and Sedimentation Equilibrium Techniques . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 59 Optical Rotatory Dispersion . . . . . . 51 Titration of Cysteine Residues with Ellman' s Reagent . 6h Titration of Cysteine Residues with p- -Mercuri- benzoate . . . . . . . . . . 69 Amino Acid Composition and Partial Specific Volume . . 69 iii iv TABLE OF CONTENTS - Continued Page Subunit Electrophoresis on Cellulose Acetate Strips . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 75 Isoelectric Focusing of the Subunits . . . . . . . . . 73 Trypsin Digestion and Peptide Mapping . . . . . . . . . 79 Cyanogen Bromide Digestion . . . . . . . . . . . . . 80 Reassociation of the Subunits . . . . . . . . . . . . . 80 DISCUSSION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 87 SUMMARY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 98 REFERENCES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . lOO LIST OF TABLES TABLE Page I. Sedimentation Coefficients for UDP-glucose Pyrophos- phorylase under Varying Conditions . . . . . . . . . . . . 58 II. Optical Rotatory Dispersion of UDP—glucose Pyrophos- phorylase . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 65 III. Amino Acid Composition of UDP-glucose Pyrophosphorylase. . 72 IV. Calculation of the Partial Specific Volume from the Amino Acid Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Th V. A Summary of the Fingerprints of Tryptic Digests of UDP-glucose Pyrophosphorylase . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 85 VI. Some Optical Rotatory Dispersion Parameters of UDP- glucose Perphosphorylase and a Group of Proteins . . . . 91 VII. Cotton Effects of L- -Polypeptides and UDP- glucose Pyrophosphorylase . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 92 FIGURE 10. ll. 12. 15. IA. LIST OF FIGURES Ultraviolet absorption spectra of the pyrophosphory— lase . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Schlieren sedimentation velocity pattern of the pyrophosphorylase . . . . . . . . Relative sedimentation rates for the enzyme in the presence and absence of reducing agent . . Apparent sedimentation coefficients, diffusion coeffi- cients, and weight-average molecular weights for the principal component of the pyrophosphorylase . Apparent weight-average, z-average, and limiting z- average molecular weights for the enzyme . . The relative sedimentation rates for the native protein and the subunits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . The relative rates of sedimentation of the subunits in guanidine hydrochloride and urea . . . . . . . . . . . . Apparent sedimentation and diffusion coefficients and weight-average molecular weights of the subunits . . . . The apparent weight-average and z-average molecular weights of the subunits . . . . . . . . . . Ultraviolet optical rotatory dispersion of the native and denatured enzyme . . . . . Visible and near ultraviolet optical rotatory dispersion of the native and denatured enzyme . . Drude plots in the visible and near ultraviolet regions for the native and denatured enzyme . Moffitt—Yang plots of the native enzyme in the 280-500 mu-spectral region . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Moffitt-Yang plot of the denatured enzyme in the 280— 500 mu spectral region . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . vi Page 29 52 5h 56 Al AB 1+5 A8 50 55 55 57 59 62 vii LIST OF FIGURES - Continued FIGURE 15. I6. 170 18. 19. 20. 21. Rate of reaction of the sulfhydryl groups of the native and denatured enzyme with Ellman's reagent . The pH dependence of the number of SH groups titrated per mole of protein . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Spectrophotometric titration of the sulfhydryl groups of the enzyme with PMB . . . . . . . . Electrophoresis of the subunits on cellulose acetate strips . Isoelectric foching of the subunits Fingerprint of a trypsin digest of the enzyme Polyacrylamide patterns of a reduced and S-carboxy- methylated sample of the enzyme before and after cleavage with cyanogen bromide . Page 66 68 71 76 78 82 85 INTRODUCTION The enzyme uridine diphosphate glucose perphosphorylase (UTP:a-D-glucose-l-phosphate uridylyltransferase, E. C. 2.7.7.9) catalyzes the biosynthesis of the important coenzyme uridine diphosphate glucose (UDP-glucose) from glucose-l-phosphate (Glc—l-P) and uridine triphosphate (UTP) with the concomitant formation of inorganic pyrophosphate (PPi)' F. - “6““ fl:-.\ Mg2+ UTP + Clo-LP: UDP-glucose + PPi (1) The enzyme appears to be ubiquitous in nature (h-8, 15-17, 19-27) and has been crystallized from calf (28), lamb, goat, sheep, rabbit (52), and human (50) livers. The enzyme also has been obtained in a highly purified state, if not crystalline, from rabbit muscle. The calf liver protein is the subject of this research. In the original work of Albrecht et al. (28), the pyrophosphorylase' was estimated to account for over 0.5% of the extractable protein of calf liver and to have a molecular weight of approximately MO0,000. Polydispersity was noted, but contamination could not be eliminated as its cause. This thesis describes: (l) a more complete study on the molecular weight of the native pyrophosphorylase and its subunits and some information concerning the nature of the minor molecular components; (2) the Optical properties, renaturation tendency, chemical composition, and subunit structure of the crystalline enzyme. LITERATURE REVIEW Uridine diphosphate glucose pyrophosphorylase belongs to a general class of enzymes which catalyze the formation of various nucleoside diphosphate sugars according to the following reaction: \ XTP + S—l-P ‘ XDPS + PPi (2) The notation, X, can be various purine or pyrimidine nucleosides and the notation, S, can be various sugars. The important nucleoside diphosphate sugar, UDP-glucose, is biosynthesized by this route. UDP—glucose, or as some have called it, "activated glucose," is an exceedingly important compound because of its glycosyl transferring ability and its role in the interconversion of sugars and formation of hexoses, pentoses and uronic acids (l-h). While studying the metabolic route for the conversion of Egalactose-l-phosphate to glucose-l—P in bakers' yeast, Leloir §§E_al, in l9h9—SO determined that a necessary thermostable cofactor iJi the conversion was uridine diphosphate glucose (5, 6). Shortly tiiereafter, in 1952—55, an enzyme was discovered in yeast by 1Qalckar and Munch-Petersen §£_al. (7, 8) that would catalyze the Ffiflrophosphorolysis of UDP—glucose to form glucose-l-phosphate and uI‘idine triphosphate. This type of pyrophosphorolytic cleavage, although extremely important to the eventual understanding of the C-h interconversion of hexoses, was not new. In 19h8-50, Kornberg §£.§l- had demonstrated the pyrophosphorolytic cleavage of some nucleoside diphosphate compounds (9-11). Several years after its discovery, Munch-Petersen purified the UDP-glucose perphosphorylase from yeast approximately 260- fold with an overall yield of 15% (12). She noted that the enzyme was unstable in dilute solutions, even in the presence of a 5 mg/ml solution of bovine serum albumin, and that 60-75% of the activity remained after three month's storage. The enzyme exhibited a broad pH profile (pH 6.5-8.0) and the reaction was stimulated by magnesium at an Optimal concentration of 2 mM. In addition to the fact that NaF at a concentration of 0.05 M and ethylenediaminetetraacetate (EDTA) at a concentration of 0.01 M had no inhibitory effect, the presence of cysteine also had no affect on the reaction. Following some radioactive exchange experiments, she proposed the possible existence of a uridylated intermediate in the reaction sequence. The decade or so after 1955 was a time of identification of the pyrophosphorylase for UDP-glucose from many sources. After the 1955 demonstration by Kalckar 2E.il- (15) of the existence of the perphosphorylase in galactose adapted Saccharomyges fragilis, Smith gt 21. (1h, 15) described its presence in nuclei of guina pig liver and mammary glands, and Burma gt g1. (16) in 1956 noted its activity in sugar beet leaves. In 1957 Neufeld e_t 21- (17) found the pyrophosphorylase in mung bean seedlings and a host of other plant sources. After partially purifying the enzyme, they noted the need for a divalent metal and found that Mge+, Mn2+, and Co2+ would serve equally as well. Further work on the characterization of the mung bean enzyme followed the next year from Ginsburg's laboratory (18). After purifying the enzyme 800-fold, he noted that the pH optimum was about 8.0 and the Michaelis constants (Km) for UDP- glucose and PPi were 1.1 x lO-uM and 2.5 x 10-hM respectively. His purified protein was not very stable and lost 90% of its activity even in the presence of mercaptoethanol after storage for 2 weeks at -70C. In that same year the pyrophosphorylase was found in the plant Impatiens holstii (19) and in pea seeds (20). The purified enzyme from pea seeds exhibited a broad pH range (pH 7.0—9.0) and its activity was not affected by fluoride or orthophosphate anions, arsenate at a concentration of 10 mm, p-chloromercuribenzoate (PMB) at a concentration of 1 mm, or Hg2+ ions at a concentration of n2+ ( 0.1 mM. M lmM) was as effective a divalent metal as was M92+ (5mM) and Co2+ and Ni2+ stimulated at a concentration of 2.5 mM. For this enzyme EDTA at a concentration of 0.01 M inhibited the reaction by 90%. Using rabbit muscle as their source, Villar-Palasi gt a1. (21) purified the pyrophosphorylase l500-fold and noted that the stability point (pH 9.8) was different from the point at which the enzyme was most active (pH 7.5). Shortly afterwards, in 1961, Basu 35 a1. (22) purified 50- fold a human brain pyrophosphorylase that showed an absolute requirement for Mge+. Although the enzyme was not affected by reducing agents such as cysteine and glutathione, 0.0001 M PMB caused the enzyme to lose 50% of its activity. It should be noted that the pyrophosphorylase has been reported in other human tissues (25-26). More recently, in 1965, Kamogawa gt a1. (27) purified the §-.2211 K-12 pyrophosphorylase 280-fold. They noted that as with other pyrophosphorylases, the pH profile was broad (pH 7.5-9.0). With Mg2+ optimal for activity, they determined the apparent equilibrium constant to be 5.0 in the direction of UTP formation. NaF, PMB, and UMP at 2 mM concentrations were not inhibitory. In 1966 Albrecht 35 a1. (28), using calf liver as a source of the enzyme, finally obtained a 500-fold purified and crystalline UDP-glucose pyrophosphorylase. When the base and sugar portion of the nucleoside diphosphate sugar was varied from uracil or glucose, the rate of the reaction was only a small percentage of that found for UDP-glucose. The protein was apparently present in large quantities in calf liver, as it represented more than 0.5% of the total extractable protein, and the specific activity and turnover number were found to be 2&0 and 85,000 respectively. The molecular weight of the protein was estimated to be h00,000 and all the substrates had Michaelis constants of about 10-5M except UTP which was 2 x 10—hM. Although Mg2+ was optimal at a concentration of 2 mM, C02+ and Mn2+ were 25% as effective at a comparable concentration. The enzyme apparently did not require reducing agents for stabilization. It is important to note the many factors that indicate that UDP-glucose pyrophosphorylase is the major catalyst for UDP- glucose biosynthesis; (l) the large amount of the enzyme in calf liver, (2) the high rate specificity for UDP—glucose, (5) the low Km for UTP and glucose-l-phosphate, (h) the high turn- over number, and probably of less importance under physiological conditions, (5) the favorable equilibrium constant (approximately 0.5 in the direction of UDP-glucose biosynthesis). More recently, DeFazio (29), employing the crystalline calf F liver enzyme and using new Spectrophotometric and chromatographic techniques, determined very accurately that the apparent equili- brium constant was 0.2 in the direction of UDP-glucose synthesis. é Because the perphosphorylase has recently been crystallized ‘ from sources other than calf liver, it is now possible to compare the proteins on the bases of their physical and chemical charact- eristics, along with the comparison of their reaction mechanisms. Extremely important is the recent purification and crystallization by Knop (50) of the pyrophosphorylase from human liver. The 500- fold purified and crystalline human liver pyrophosphorylase was almost homogeneous as judged by sucrose density gradient ultra- centrifugation,polyacrylamine gel electrophoresis, and sediment- ation in the analytical ultracentrifuge. The pyrophosphorylase exhibited the usual broad alkaline pH profile. Mg2+ was most active at a concentration of 5 mM, but Co2+ could serve as the divalent metal at only lh% of the rate with Mg2+. Also,the human liver enzyme required the presence of a reducing agent to protect against inactivation. Since the original study of Villar-Palasi gt a1., Bass e£_al, (51) have highly purified, if not crystallized, the pyrophosphorylase from rabbit muscle. The enzyme exhibited one band on poly— acrylamide gel columns, but two bands on sucrose density gradient columns. The protein also required reducing agents to prevent against inactivation. Still in progress are the investigations of Gillett g£_al. (52). They were able to crystallize the pyrophosphorylase from lamb, goat, and rabbit liver. Preliminary experiments indicate that the enzymes from lamb and goat are extremely similar, if not identical,to the calf liver pyrophosphorylase. These conclusions have come from similarities in gross crystal structure, electro— phoretic results on polyacrylamide gel columns, and the apparent lack of necessity for protection by reducing agents. On the other hand, the rabbit liver perphosphorylase is a sulfhydryl requiring perphosphorylases and its gross crystal structure and electro— phoretic behavior are different from the calf, lamb, goat, and human liver preparations. Many patients suffering from the hereditary disorder known as galactosemia are able to metabolize a small amount of galactose. Due to the reports of Isselbacher gt a1. (55, 5h) and other authors (17, 55, 56) relating to a separate UDP—galactose pyrophosphorylase pathway in these galactosemics, Ting et 31. (57) and Knop (50) have studied the question in relationship to the crystalline UDP—glucose pyrophosphorylase. The results of both studies support the conclusion that there is not a separate UDP-galactose pyrophosphorylase. Their conclusidns were based on the fact that, throughout the purification of the calf and the human liver pyrophosphorylases, the UDP-galactose/UDP-glucose activity ratio remained unchanged. EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURE Materials and Methods Reagents All chemicals were purchased from commercial sources and where critical, the sources are indicated. Crystalline UDP— glucose pyrophosphorylase was prepared according to the procedure of Albrecht et_al. (28) as modified by Gillett _§>gl. (58). Spectrophotometry_and Measurementgpf Enzyme Activity Spectrophotometry and the estimation of pyrophosphorylase activity were determined as described by Albrecht EE.§1- (28). Assay system 1 was routinely used. Absorption Spectroscopy A solution of approximately 1 mg/ml of pyrophosphorylase in 0.01 M tricine buffer (pH 8.56) was dialyzed against 1000 volumes of the above buffer for 18-2h hours. Values for the actual protein content were obtained using the molar extinction coefficient, and were checked with the Lowry procedure (59). The spectra were taken at 2h°C in a Cary 15 Spectrometer in 1.5 m1 quartz cells with a 1 cm light path. Determination of the Extinction Coefficient Approximately 50 mg of a crystalline suspension of the pyrophosphorylase, that was stored in 0.01 M tricine buffer (pH 8.5), 10 11 which was 20% in ammonium sulfate, was diluted to about 6 ml with 0.01 M sodium phosphate buffer (pH 7.0). The material was then dialyzed against 1 liter of the 0.01 M phosphate buffer for 2h hours. The slight amount of precipitate was removed by centri- fugation and the solution was redialyzed for a total of 5 days against changes amounting to 10 liters of fresh phosphate buffer. Dry weight was determined after high-speed centrifugation which resulted in a clear solution. Metal stainless steel planchets were used as tares. The planchets were heated in a drying oven at 1050C for 2h hours, and then allowed to equilibrate to room temperature in a dessi- cator over CaC12 for 1 1/2 hours. After the equilibration period, the planchets were removed with forceps and weighed with a semi-microanalytical balance. To insure a constant weight, further heating, equilibration, and weighing were performed at 5 and 10 hours after the initial weighing. Five samples of the pyrophosphorylase and two of the outside dialysis solution were pipetted into the planchets. All planchets were then dried at 85°C for 6 hours and then at 1050C until a constant weight was obtained. Extinction readings were made on the sample at 280 mu, 278.5 mu and 260 mu. Dilutions of this solution were measured on spectrophotometers which were independently standardized. Cross-standardization with the Lowry method involved Bovine Serum Albumin (BSA) as the comparison standard. The dry weight value was also cross—standardized with the 280/260 method of Warburg and Christian (ho). 12 Carbohydrate Content The phenol-sulfuric acid method of Dubois gt _1. (Al) was used to determine the carbohydrate content of the pyrophosphorylase. Galactose was used as the internal carbohydrate standard and ovalbumin was used to check the sensitivity of the method to protein-bound carbohydrates. Ultracentrifugation All ultracentrifugation experiments were performed near 50C in a Spinco Model B analytical ultracentrifuge equipped with phase-plate schlieren optics. Schlieren patterns were read with the aid of a Bausch and Lomb or Gaertner microcomparator. Sedimen- tation velocity analyses were performed at 59,780 rpm and diffusion coefficient analyses were performed at h,059 rpm. Diffusion coefficients (D) were calculated by the height-to-area analysis (A2) and were converted as were the sedimnetation coefficients (S) to standard conditions of water at 200C. Double sector synthetic boundary cells were used for the diffusion coefficient analyses. Sedimentation equilibrium analysis was done by the short column technique of Van Holde and Baldwin (A5). The solution column depth was routinely 1.7 mm (0.06 ml of protein solution). The rotor velocities were 5,000 for the native enzyme and 20,h00 for the enzyme dissociated in guanidine hydrochloride. Sedimen- tation equilibrium experiments were allowed to proceed for 2h hours for the native and from 2h-56 hours for the dissociated enzyme. Molecular weights, M(s/D), that were evaluated from sedi- mentation and diffusion data were analysed by the formula of l5 Svedberg (Ah): M(s/D) = SRT D(l-vp) where R is the gas content, T is the absolute temperature, p is the solvent density, and v is the partial specific volume. The apparent weight-average molecular weights determined from sedimentation equilibrium experiments were calculated from the equation: 1 (l-vp) mg Co r 2 - r 2 M App RT c where w is the angular velocity, Co (determined from a synthetic boundary experiment) is the initial protein concentration, Cb and Cm, and r and rm are the concentrations and radii at the bottom b and meniscus of the solution column, respectively. The apparent z-average molecular weights were calculated from the equation: 2 .21, ES ’ _E_ (:3 = MZ(l-Vp) w (Cb‘Cm) r dr r dr RT b b m m where E: and _: are the concentration gradients at the dr b dr m. bottom and the meniscus of the solution column. The intrinsic weight-average and z-average molecular weights were obtained by extrapolation of the apparent molecular weights to infinite dilution. Concentrations for extrapolation of the 1A apparent molecular weights were evaluated as em + cb)/ 2 for the weight-average molecular weights and cm + c for the z-average b molecular weights (A5). Sedimentation, diffusion, and equilibrium calculations were performed with statistical analysis on a CDC 5600 computer with programs kindly supplied by Dr. W. C. Deal. The densities and viscosities of solutions not containing guanidine hydrochloride were calculated using reference tables (AA, A5). The relative viscosity of solutions containing guanidine hydrochloride were measured at temperatures near those of the centrifuge experiments with a Cannon-Ostwald viscosimeter. Densities were measured pycnometrically using water to calibrate the pycnometer at identical temperatures to thase used for the guanidine hydro- chloride solutions. To prevent interference from products of mercaptoethanol and guanidine hydrochloride (A6), freshly distilled mercapto- ethanol was used and synthetic boundary experiments were performed immediately after dialysis. Native samples were dialyzed for 2A-A8 hours and the denatured enzyme was dialyzed for 56 hours with rapid stirring. The partial specific volume utilized in these studies was calculated from the amino acid analysis (see amino acid analysis section)§and found to be 0.7A ml/gm. 15 Optical Rotatory Dispersion (ORD) ORD measurements were performed on a Cary Model 60 Spectro- polarimeter and critical wavelength readings were checked on a Durrum-Jasco ORD/uv—5 Optical Rotatory Dispersion Recorder. A11 readings were made under a nitrogen purge at room temperature (Ca. 2AOC) for the Durrum-Jasco machine and in a thermostatically controlled environment at 270C in the Cary 60. For the Cary 60 studies, A5 mg of the pyrophosphorylase in crystalline suspension was added to a pH 8.5 solution of 0.01 M tris-HCl (Mann Ultra Pure) that was 0.10 M in KCl to make a solution of about 1A mg/ml. The solution was then dialyzed for several days against the above buffer system. Before rotatory dispersion analysis, the solution was diluted and the protein content was determined by the Lowry method and then converted to a dry weight basis. To obtain readings on the native protein in the 195-500 mu spectral range, the protein solutions were varied from 0.26 - 1.50% in layers that were 0.1 mm to 1 cm. The denatured pyrophosphorylase was prepared by diluting the native enzyme solution with an 8M solution of guanidine hydrochloride that was 0.01 M in tris-HCl (pH 8.50) and 0.01 M in KCl to obtain a 6 M solution. The pyrophosphorylase was allowed to remain in the denaturing solvent at room temperature for about 2 hours prior to the rotatory dispersion measurements. Readings were made on a 0.16% solution in cells that varied from 1 mm to 1 cm in layer thickness throughoUt the 220-500 mu spectral range. 16 All observed rotations were corrected for the buffer blank and converted to specific rotations ([a];) by use of the formula: where aobs is the corrected observed reading of the protein solution, 1 is the path length in decimeters, c is the concentration in gm/100 m1, and T is the temperature in degrees centigrade. Reduced mean residue rotations, ([m’];), were computed from the specific rotations according to the formula: , T ’ w 5 T where MRW is the mean residue weight and is taken as 111 for the pyrophosphorylase and n is the refractive index of the solvent at wavelength A. The solvent for the native enzyme was assumed to be water at 20°C and the refractive index at various wavelengths was evaluated according to the following Duclaux-Jeantet formula (A7): n2 = 1.762550 - 0.0155998A + O°OO630957 2 (A - 0.0158800) where the wavelength, A, is in microns. The refractive index for the 6 M guanidine hydrochloride solution was evaluated from the following basic Sellmeier equation (A8, A9): n2 = 1 + 0.995AA2/(A2 - 15067) where A is measured in mu. 17 Visible rotatory dispersion was determined according to the following one term Drude relationship: where AC is the dispersion constant and is obtained from the slope of a plot of [0c]TA2 vs. [a]T. A A The Moffitt a0 and b0 parameters were evaluated according to the phenomenological equation of Moffitt and Yang (50): 2 A [a]; 2 a0; 2 + 20502 2 (A ‘A0 ) (A “A0 ) or )1 [a1T (12-102) = avoe + boxo 2 2 (A -Ao ) Using a A0 of 212 mu, 216 mu, and 220 mu for various spectral ranges, a0 and b0 values were determined from the intercept and T h/(A2—A02). A (A2-Ao2) vs. A0 slope, respectively, of a plot of [a] Titration of Cysteine Residues with Ellman's Reagent (DTNB) All titrations with DTNB_[5,5:dithiobis (2-nitrobenzoic acid)] were performed at 25°C in a total reaction volume of 0.5 ml. The liberated thionitrobenzoate anion was quantitated at A12 mu by the extinction coefficient of 15.6 reported by Ellman (51). For experiments involving pH dependent titrations, the extinction coefficient of the thionitrobenzoate anion was taken to be constant over the pH 6.0 to 10.0 range, since it had been shown to vary little in this region (52). The enzyme 18 concentration was determined by its extinction coefficient or by the method of Lowry. EDTA was included in all titrations at a concentration of 20 mM. When guanidine hydrochloride or urea was used as the denaturant, a freshly recrystallized sample or a Mann Ultra Pure product was used. All titrations were initiated by the addition of 10 pl of 10 M DTNB (Aldrich) in 0.1 M phosphate buffer (pH 7.0). Extraneous reaction of DTNB with the solvent system was corrected for by using a blank solution that contained all the components except the protein. Titration of Cysteine Residues with p—Mercuribenzoate (PMB) The procedure used to determine the sulfhydryl content of the pyrophosphorylase with PMB was based on the Spectrophotometric method of Boyer (55) and Benesch 3: a1. (5A). The PMB (Sigma) was purified according to Boyer's directions and standardized immediately before use. The reported extinction coefficient of 1.69 x 102+ (pH 7.0) at 255 mu was used. All titrations and PMB standardizations were performed in 5.0 M urea because the native enzyme became turbid upon titration. The pyrophosphorylase samples were dialyzed overnight against 1000 volumes of 0.05 M phosphate or pyrophosphate buffers. The initial solution volume was 1.0 ml, and a reference cell that contained all the components except the protein was used to correct for the reaction of PMB with the buffer system. Ten ul aliquots of the standardized PMB solutions were added to both the reference and protein cells, and optical density increments were recorded at 250 mu immediately after the addition. The 19 reaction was considered complete when further aliquots of PMB failed to produce an absorbance increment. The Optical density increments for the protein solution were corrected for dilution by the PMB additions, and for the reference readings. Amino Acid Analysis The sample was prepared according to the procedure of Moore and Stein (55). Five mg samples of salt-free and lyOphilized pyrophosphorylase were placed in constricted heavy-walled pyrex tubes (16 x 125 mm). The protein was then suspended in 1.0 ml of 6N HCl and the tubes were frozen, degassed, and sealed with the aid of a vacuum pump which reduced the pressure to below 50 microns of mercury. Hydrolysis was carried out at 1100 i 1°C for the indicated times and the contents were evaporated twice to dryness at AOOC in 10 ml flasks on a rotary evaporator. The residues were readily taken up in 1.0 ml of water, and the amino acid content of the hydrolysates were determined with a Technicon Amino Acid Analyzer using a procedure based on the Piez and Morris (56) modification of the Spackman, Stein, and Moore (57) procedure. Each analysis was performed in about 2A hours with a 150 cm column loaded with type A chromobeads. Tryptophan was estimated separately by two of the more common methods: (1) the chemical p-dimethylaminobenzaldehyde (PDAB) technique of Spies and Chambers (58, 59); (2) the spectrophoto- metric determination of Goodwin and Morton (60). Tyrosine was also estimated using the latter technique. 20 In the PDAB method, the L—tryptophan (General Biochemicals) and PDAB (Sigma) were purified according to the directions of Spies and Chambers. Standards and pyrophosphorylase samples, estimated to contain 10—1507 of tryptOphan were analyzed. Quantities of solution A (15.92 mg of L-tryptophan and 5A8 mg PDAB dissolved in 116.0 ml of 19 N sulfuric acid)and solution B (500 mg PDAB dissolved in 100 ml of 19 N sulfuric acid) were mixed in 25 ml glass—stoppered erlenmeyer flasks to give a final volume of 10.0 ml and the desired tryptOphan content. In the case of the pyrophosphorylase, 10.0 ml of solution B were added to the solid salt—free, lyOphilized protein. All flasks were mixed and allowed to remain in darkness at room temperature for 12 hours. One tenth ml of 0.0A% sodium nitrite was added to each flask,and after mixing and incubation for 50 minutes, the optical densities of the solutions were read at 600 mu in a Coleman Jr. Spectrophotometer. The tryptOphan content of the pyrophosphorylase was determined from the standard curve. In the Spectrophotometric determination of tryptOphan, approximately 2.5 mg of the lyOphilized, salt—free pyrophosphorylase was dissolved in 0.1 ml of 0.1 N NaOH and the exact concentration of one-tenth and one-twentieth dilutions of the stock enzyme were measured every 10 mu from 280 mu to 560 mu. Readings were also taken at 29A mu. The 280 mu and 29A mu readings were corrected for haze by extrapolation of the optical densities in the 520— 560 mu region. The moles of tryptOphan and tyrosine were determined by the equations of Goodwin and Morton. 21 In addition to the DTNB and PMB titrations (see respective sections), the cysteine content of the perphosphorylase was evaluated by chromatographic analysis of the acid—hydrolyzed, reduced and S-carboxymethylated (RSCM) enzyme. RSCM pyrophos- phorylase were prepared according to the procedure of Crestfield, Stein, and Moore (61). Fifteen to twenty-five mg of the salt- free, lyOphilized pyrophosphorylase were placed in a 15 ml screw-cap vial. Urea (5.61 g of a Mann Ultra Pure product) and the following solutions made up in 02 free water were added: 0.50 ml of a 50 mg/ml solution of disodium EDTA, 5.0 m1 tris buffer (5.25 g plus 9.0 ml 1.0 N HCl diluted to 50 ml with water), and 0.1 m1 2-mercaptoethanol. The solution was made up to the 7.5 m1 mark with water and 8 M urea that was 0.2% in EDTA was used to fill the vial to the 12.0 ml mark. A layer of nitrogen gas was then placed over the top of the solution. After incubation for A hours at room temperature, 0.268 g of iodoacetic acidl (Eastman) in 1.0 ml of 1.0 N NaOH (adjusted to pH 8.5 with concentrated NaOH) was added. Further manipulation was performed in the dark. After 15 minutes, the solution was dialyzed against either 0.01 M NH4HC03 or 50% acetic acid to eliminate the components of the reaction. Both the solution in the case of the acetic acid dialysate and the suspension in the case of the NH4HC03 dialysate were shell frozen and lyOphilized. The acetic acid dialyzed sample tended to form a glass. lThe iodoacetic acid was recrystallized from a diethylether- hexane solution and dried en vacuo over silica gel. 22 Electrophoresis on Cellulose Acetate Strips A 7 mg/ml solution of the crystalline pyrophosphorylase that was 0.05 M in sodium bicarbonate buffer (pH 11.0) and 6M in urea was dialyzed for 2A hours against the same buffer system prior to electrophoresis. Cellulose acetate strips (2.5 x 18 cm) were soaked for 1 hour in the outside dialysis solution used above. Excess solution was blotted from the strips with the aid of a piece of filter paper. Five ul were streaked across the strip, without scratching the cellulose acetate surface or spotting the edges of the strip. The still moist, but thoroughly impregnated strip was subjected to electrophoresis at a constant voltage (65-70 volts per strip) in a Shandon Electrophoresis Apparatus for 5 hours at AOC. The strips were then gently blotted with filter paper and fixed by submersion for 10 minutes in 5% trichloroacetic acid (TCA). The excess solution was removed by blotting and the strips were stained for 10-15 minutes by submerging them in 0.2% Ponseau S in 5% TCA. The excess dye was removed by repeated washings of the strips in 5% acetic acid prior to drying. Isoelectric Focusing Isoelectric focusing was performed on an LKB 8101 electro- focusing column with a 110 m1 capacity. The technique used was described by Svensson (62) and Vesterberg and Svensson (65). A step-wise 0-50% sucrose density gradient was used with an equal mixture of pH 5-10 and pH 5—8 LKB carrier ampholytes which were used at a final concentration of 1% (w/v). All solutions including 25 those of the cathode and anode were made 6 M in urea. To prevent oxidation and reduction, sulfuric acid and ethylenediamine were added to the anode and cathode solutions, respectively. Six mg of the pyrophosphorylase in 0.5 ml were added to an intermediate fraction of the less dense solution, and solid urea was added to a concentration of 6 M. The analysis was performed for A8 hours at ADC and final focusing was accomplished at 900 volts. The column was then drained and 9 drop fractions were collected and were analyzed at 280 mu for protein. Trypsin Digestion and Peptide Mapping Fingerprinting experiments on the perphosphorylase were carried out by standard procedures (6A, 65). Trypsin digestion was found to proceed best when the enzyme was heat denatured. A 10 mg/ml solution of the pyrophosphorylase in 0.2 M NH4HC03 (pH 8.6) was dialyzed for 2A hours against the same buffer. The solution was then transferred to a small glass vial, and the protein was coagulated by heating the vial at 90°C for 6 minutes. The tube was then cooled by emersion in an ice bath. The protein was dispersed by use of a small magnetic stirring bar. A 2% protein ratio of TPCK-trypsin (Worthington Biochemicals Corporation) was added over a period of 20 hours. Trypsin was a freshly prepared 5 mg/ml solution in 0.001 N HCl. The clear and colorless solution was centrifuged to eliminate a trace amount of suspended material and the digest was then shell-frozen and lyOphilized. The white fluffy digest proved to be insoluble in water, but soluble in dilute ammonia water (1:15). Two to three mg of the 2A digest was routinely used for each map and was applied in enough ammonia water to make about a 50 mg/ml solution. Chromatography was performed in the first direction on full sheets of Whatman 5 MM chromatography paper (18.5 x 22.25 cm). Discrete spots were observed when the solvent system was n-butanol: pyridine: acetic acid: water (90:60:18:72). The chromatograms were routinely developed in a chromatocab for 27 hours at room temperature and then air-dried overnight. Electrophoresis was performed in the second direction in a Gilson Model D Electro- phorator. The chromatograms were exposed to 2100 volts for 2 hours in the pH 5.5 buffer system containing pyridine: acetic acid: water (1:10:289), and the papers were again air-dried overnight. The peptides were visualized by dipping the papers in 0.25% ninhydrin (General Biochemicals) in acetone; the spots were allowed to develop at room temperature for 5 hours, and then in the dark overnight. Tryptophan-containing peptides were visualized by dipping the ninhydrin—developed chromatograms in Ehrlich's stain (66) which was prepared by freshly mixing 900 ml acetone, 100 m1 concentrated HCl, and 10 g p-dimethylaminobenzal- dehyde. The HCl bleached all the peptides and after several minutes, the tryptOphan—containing spots developed a blue color. The modified Sukaguchi reagent (67) was used to detect the presence of arginine on untreated maps. The chromatOgrams were dipped in 0.0125% d-napthol in absolute ethanol. After air drying, they were sprayed lightly with a solution of 1.5 ml of 25 A-5% sodium hypochlorite and 25.5 ml of 10% NaOH. Arginine peptides turned a light red color. Cyanogen Bromide Cleavage Cleavage of the pyrophosphorylase with cyanogen bromide was performed by the procedure of Gross e; g1. (68) as modified by Steers et__l. (69). Three to four mg of RSCM—pyrophosphorylase in a glass-stOppered tube were dissolved in 2.0 m1 of 70% formic acid. A 50-fold excess of cyanogen bromide (Eastman) over methionine (taken to be about 70 residues per mole) was added. The reaction was allowed to proceed at room temperature for 16-20 hours and then the digest was dried and the volatile components were removed by lyophilization. A white, fluffy digest was obtained. The components of the digest were monitored by electro- phoresis on 7.5% polyacrylamide gel columns with the pH 8.7 system described by Davis gt g1. (70). All gels were 5 M in urea and the digest (200-500 ug) was added to the sample gel in a 10 M urea solution, so that the final gel concentration was 5 M. Solubilization was also possible in a 1:15 solution of NH4OH, but better acrylamide patterns were obtained with the urea system. The subunits and the RSCM-enzyme were compared with the cyanogen bromide digests using 5% polyacrylamide gel columns that were 5 M in urea. 26 Subunit Reassociation Dissociation and reconstitution experiments were performed according to the procedure of Deal (71). The dissociation medium contained 2.A5 gm of urea (8 M), 0.1 ml of mercaptoethanol, 0.50 ml of 2 M ammonium sulfate, 2.A0 m1 of 0.A7 M glycine buffer (pH 9.5), and water to make 5.0 m1. A crystalline suspension of the pyrophosphorylase (1.5 mg) was diluted to 1.0 ml with the dissociation mixture and a control system was prepared by dilution of the enzyme into a mixture containing everything except the urea. The control tube was warmed at 55°C to dissolve the crystals and both samples were allowed to remain for 2 hours at 5-A°C. Reassociation experiments were attempted by two different procedures. The first method was the direct dilution of the control and dissociated enzyme into the system wherein activity was measured. A second procedure was the 1:100 dilution at 0°C of the dissociated enzyme into a reassociation mixture which contained 0.25 M imidazole buffer (pH 6.3), 0.2 M KCl, 0.03 M glutathione, and either 0.0A M DPN, 0.01 M UDPG or no additional component. In the method that utilized the reassociation mixture, care was taken to keep all micropipettes at 0°C, and all dilutions were made slowly with stirring at that temperature to prevent precipit— ation. After the dilution at 0°C, the tubes were transferred to a water bath at 15-16°C, and aliquots were removed for activity measurements for times up to 5 hours. RESULTS Absorption Spectra Figure 1 shows the typical aromatic amino acid spectra of the pyrophosphorylase. A maximum was observed at 278.5 mu and a minimum at 255.0 mu. Peaks were also noted in the spectra at 258.5 mu, 265.0 mg, 268.0 mu, 285.5 Hm,and 292.0 mu. The purified enzyme exhibited a 280/260 ratio of 1.6. Extinction Coefficient The protein samples were weighed with a precision of 10.025 mg, and the Optical density readings were obtained with a precision of about 1%. It was found that in 0.01 M phosphate buffer (pH 7.0) a 0.1% solution of the pyrophosphorylase had an optical density of 0.719 in a 1 cm light path at 280 mu. This Sat corresponds to a molar extinction coefficient of 5.A0 x 10 this wavelength. Protein estimated by dry weight was 95% of the values determined by the Lowry method with BSA as a comparison standard. Also, protein estimated by the 280/260 method of Warburg and Christian was 21% lower than the actual dry weight. Carbohydrate Content The carbohydrate content, as determined by the phenol- sulfuric acid method of Dubois 35 gl., was no more than 0.02%. 27 WC Figure 1. Ultraviolet absorption spectra of the pyrophosphorylase The protein concentration was 0.80 mg/ml in 0.01 M tricine (pH 8.56). A Cary 15 Spectrometer was used with a 1 cm light path at a temperature of 2A°C. 29 1E .Ihwzmqm><>> mum 9m no.0. man EN new new now new _ fl _ _ _ _ T ALISNEO ‘IVOlldO 5O Homggeneity and Molecular Weight of the Enzyme by Sedimentation and Diffusion Techniques When two and three times recrystallized pyrophosphorylase was subjected to ultracentrifugal analysis, it became obvious that the pyrophosphorylase was polydisperse. With the major sedimenting component, there was at least one more rapidly sedimenting component (Figure 2). At concentrations (0.2-1%) of protein and conditions used in these experiments, the minor components amounted to about A% or less of the total protein. Recrystallization of the enzyme up to six times has not altered the relative amount or mobility of these minor components. At times, two rapidly sedimenting components may be visualized. In an experiment that yielded three components, the sedimentation coefficients,Sgééi,were 15.22 for the principal component, 19.66 S and 25.08 S for the two minor components. Using the sedimentation coefficients and assuming spherical entities with a partial specific volume of 0.7A ml/gm, approximate molecular weight ratios of 1.0, 1.8 and 2.6 were obtained for the major component and the two minor components, respectively. It thus appears that multimers of the pyrophosphorylase molecule may exist. The results were essentially identical regardless of whether mercaptoethanol at a concentration of 0.1 M was included in the buffer system. The comparison of the mobilities of the native enzyme in the presence and absence of mercaptoethanol is shown in Figure 5. It thus appears that a reducing agent itself would not cause dissociation of the enzyme. 51 Figure 2. Schlieren sedimentation velocity pattern of the perphosphorylase The temperature was A°C and the enzyme was 5.2 mg/ml in 0.01 M tricine buffer (pH 8.5), 0.1 M in mercaptoethanol, and 0.1 M in NaCl. The diaphragm angle was 65° and sedimentation is from left to right. 52 ,b .a ..; I ll .1 . z 1- 1w” 55 Figure 5. Relative sedimentation rates for the enzyme in the presence and absence of reducing agent The upper pattern shows the enzyme in the presence of 0.1 M mercaptoethanol, and the lower pattern shows the enzyme in the absence of 0.1 M mercaptoethanol. Both samples were 0.01 M in tris-HCl (pH 8.5) and 0.1 M in NaCl. 5A 55 Figure A. Apparent sedimentation coefficients, diffusion coefficients, and weight-average molecular weights for the principal component of the perphosphorylase The enzyme was analyzed in 0.02 M triethanol- amine buffer (pH 7.5), 0.1 M in NaCl, and 0.1 M in mercaptoethanol. 56 3.ON bzw_o_.n_n_woo zo_mDn_n:o 5 5. 5 5 0.0. x :1ng ".3830: 5 3 0. hzwariwoo 20—h4h2w25wm 5. 4 3 2 2 .3 5 _ 1 a .e . _ _ l - . . .. m . i l -mu . * M 2m . / 1 com 1 1 18%. _.,o l. m N T S l u l l a. 16nlv e .. . a m m. a m _. ..., m T .. 2% I I m l4~ We : . LQW E 08% m4 on m .. 0D“. 1 .. 12m / . _ _ e n_ _ _ w M B W. 4 3 2 3. 3 Afiocumv sag o0. _ 57 Since the minor components represented a small fraction of the total protein, molecular weight determinations were made using the sedimentation and diffusion techniques. Sedimentation coefficients have varied under all conditions by about 6% and combination of sedimentation and diffusion data were therefore determined on the same sample. Table 1 compares the sediment- ation behavior of the pyrophosphorylase under various conditions of buffer and pH, and different protein preparations. In some of the earlier work, the sedimentation coefficients varied by more than 6%, but it is believed that this simply represented an inaccurately known protein concentration. Figure A shows the extrapolation to infinite dilution of the apparent sedimentation and diffusion coefficients. The principal boundary was used for this analysis. Extrapolation to zero protein concentration 0 yielded a value for S20,w -7 of 1A.A5 and a value for Dgo,w of 2.87 x 10 cm2/sec. Combination of the apparent sedimentation and diffusion coefficients have yielded a molecular weight for the principal component (M8(s/D)) of A72 x 105 gm/mole. Although the sedimentation and diffusion coefficients varied in some cases, extrapolation to infinite dilution under various conditions of buffer, pH, and different protein preparation yielded values in close agreement. For example, an experiment in 0.01 M tricine (pH 8.5) that was 0.1 M in NaCl and 0.1 M in mercaptoethanol of 1A.10 S, a D20 of 2.72 x 10'7 cm2/sec and a . 0 yielded a 820 w ,w ) M3(s/D) of A85,000 gm/mole. 58 HOGmLDOODOmonoEIN u mmzm mm.ma 00.: A m.m m0 ”H002 z H.0 mocAEoHocozooanu 2 No.0 m0.mH 00.: s m.w m0 ”H002 z H.0 mooflosamazosflm z H0.0 0:.ma 00.: e m.w ma ”H002 z H.0 mocfloan z H0.0 em.na 0m.m e m.e ma mmmz 2 H.0 ”H002 z H.0 mocaeoaocoguoann z m0.0 mm.mH ne.m 0 m.w mm ”mm: 2 H.0 maomz z H.0 ”defloHED z H0.0 n0.mH 00.: m m.w mo mmmz z H.0 maooz z H.0 mocflofinu z H0.0 0H.mH 00.m : m.w ma mmmz z H.0 ”Hooz z H.0 mocaofinn z H0.0 :m.ma mm.m m m.w mo ”mm: 2 H.0 maooz z H.0 moeaoano z H0.0 Hm.ma we.m m m.w mm ”mm: 2 H.0 ”Hooz z H.0 mocfiofleo z H0.0 mm.ma 0m.m a m.e mm Mam: : H.0 mauoz z H.0 “Hom-mano z H0.0 00.ma 0m.m a m.e ma maomz z H.0 ”Hom-mfinp z H0.0 sqomm AHE\mEv COHpmpm mQOHuflocoo Gwouonm udmpm m:0flufiocoo mcfi>nm> noon: omma>nonamozmop>m omoozamumms pom mucoe0flmmooo COHumu:oEHUom H mqmflH 59 Molecular Weight of the Natiye Enzyme by the Sedimentation Equilibrium Technique Sedimentation equilibrium experiments yielded molecular weight estimates that were less equivocal than the sedimentation and diffusion techniques. These experiments are shown in figure 5. Discrepancies are noted not only between the weight-and z- average molecular weights, but also between the limiting z—average and the intrinsic z—average molecular weights. Due to some scatter in the weight—average molecular weights, a value between A76,000 and 570,000 was found. The limiting value of A76,000 is in good agreement with that obtained from the sedimentation and diffusion techniques. Similarly, values of 606,000 and 1,052,000 were obtained for the limiting z-average and the intrinsic z-average molecular weights. Homogeneity and Molecular Weight of the Subunits by Sedimentation, Diffusion, and Sedimentation Equilibrium Techniques Figure 6 shows the relative rates of migration of the native enzyme in the lower pattern and the enzyme denatured in 5 M urea in the upper pattern. It appeared from this experiment that subunits of the pyrophosphorylase exist. Figure 7 shows the similarity in mobility of the denatured states of the pyrophos— phorlase in urea and guanidine hydrochloride. Sedimentation, diffusion and equilibrium studies were performed in 6 M guanidine hydrochloride and 0.1 M mercaptoethanol to characterize the pyrophosphorylase subunits. In this solvent A0 Figure 5. Apparent weight-average, z—average and limiting Znaverage molecular weights for the pyrophosphorylase Concentrations were evaluated as (Cm + Cb)/2 for the weight-average and Cm + C for the limiting and b intrinsic z-average molecular weights. The analysis was performed at 5°C at a speed of 5,000 rpm. The buffer system contained 0.01 M tris-HCl (pH 8.5) that was 0.1 M in NaCl and 0.1 M in MSH. A1 X 1H9|3M HV‘anS'IOW ..Ol 00. 0.00 Qmm Qmm o_ 8 35:05: zo_._.°]- 60 The Moffitt plot of the data for the enzyme denatured in 6 M guanidine hydrochloride is shown in figure 1A. A A0 of 212 mu was utilized and the ac and b0 values in this solvent system were -6A2 deg-cme/decimole and approximately 0 deg-cm2/ decimole, respectively. A summary of the optical rotatory dispersion parameters of the native and denatured enzyme is given in table II. There was I; a blue shift of l mu of the cotton effect trough and a red shift I of A mu of the cotton effect peak from the accepted values for helical proteins and synthetic polypeptides. Also, the cotton I effect extrema showed relatively low amplitudes when compared 5; with values for helical polyglutamic acid ([m’] of 15,000- 255 16,0000 (76,77) and [m’] of 70,000-80,000O (76,78)). 198 Estimates of helicity have varied depending upon which method of calculation was utilized. Using a value of 212 mu and 2A6 mu for the denatured and native dispersion constants and 212 mu and 25A mn for 0 and 50% helicity of reference poly- glutamic acid (7A), a helical content of 21.A% was calculated. Also, employing a be of —125 deg-cm2/decimole (A0 of 212 mu) for the native perphosphorylase and -650 deg—ch/decimole for the be of helical polyglutamic acid, a helical content of 20% was calculated. The excellent agreement in the calculated helical content from the above methods is not substantiated analyzing the amplitudes of the cotton effect trough and peak (77). A value of 10% or less was obtained from the amplitude of the 255 mu trough. Standard values for the peak regions are still uncertain, but a helical content of about 16% was calculated when a suggested amplitude was utilized. 61 Figure 1A. Moffitt-Yang plot of the denatured enzyme in the 280-500 mm spectral region See figure 10 for the experimental conditions. 62 0.0 . . 0e 11 e: 7 7v 0: . wxz 0.... H 0..» I. «m 1 «m 65 $7.1 - .asallr oHosfioop\msoumop Lo muficsm as 00m-mwN A0 m m as 00m-0am as oomuoan An 0 s so Hmohuom m ESEHXME as 00muon A0 III as NON . 2 ESEHXmE I U n . U as A I 5:5: a: 5.1 a 50 em - An on Hm>0mw090 mnmau Am Ill. 15 mmm K as 00N- :0 osmmm- oNHmm- mmm~.s_ m.N:0. :0N- An oo 0 39H oHsN- A0 .III as NMN s UK 0 as 0NN A0 as OHN as 0:N 2 as NHN as GHN An 02 as 00m as N N o 0.0» - m.» - 0 H A O H O m OJNfi H nonsum:om o>flpmz nouosmpmm oonsumcwm o>wumz souwsmumm unfimmoz Honosoo wmmaznonmmosmop>m omoozamumms wo coflmuommflm Apoumuom HOOHDQO HH mqmae 6A Titration of Cysteine Residues with Ellman's Reagent The rate of reaction of the sulfhydryl groups of a several month old preparation of the pyrophosphorylase at pH 7.5 is illustrated in figure 15. At this pH, 9-11 SH groups of the native enzyme reacted in less than 2 minutes. In 6 M guanidine hydrochloride, lA-l6 SH groups immediately reacted. In order to detect if the DTNB reactable SH groups of the pyrophosphorylase were sensitive to pH, titrations were performed in the pH 6.0 to 10.0 range. The titrations proceeded for 15 ti.” Jan-41;: . . . minutes before the final readings were taken. Figure 16 shows the effect of pH on the number of SH groups that react readily with DTNB. There was a gradual increase in the number of SH groups with increasing pH, and the maximum value found was 16 moles of SH per mole of protein. Other preparations have shown the same increasing trend in reactable groups, but the absolute number has been lower than that indicated in figurd 16. In fact, preparations that were a year old (stored in a crystalline state in (NH4)2SO4) yielded from 1-15 readily reactable SH groups in the native state and from 5-16 readily reactable groups in the denatured state. The various preparations did not appear to have significanély different sedimentation coefficients. At present, 16 moles of SH per mole of protein represents the maximum number found. After these are titrated in the native state, the enzyme maintained 70% of the activity of the unreacted protein. As expected, 0 SH groups per mole of protein was found when the reduced and unreduced S—carboxymethylated pyrophosphorylase was titrated with DTNB. 65 Figure 15. Rate of reaction of the sulfhydryl groups of the native and denatured enzyme with Ellman's reagent Both reactions contained 0.1 M tris—HCl buffer (pH 7.5), 20 mM EDTA, 0.2 mM DTNB, and 1.250 mg/ml of pyrophosphorylase. The denatured enzyme solution was 6 M in guanidine hydrochloride. 66 05.32.: 2. win. 0.1N.0_00¢N00_.¢_N_0_00¢N0 u—udfi d—qu-afiq l 52>sz oumPEzmo ”1030:1089: Nzazsao P I w2>Nzw m>_._.._._>_._.0< ._n .10 0mm 00 0K0 mom 00m.HH 00:.0 oomsn we mmmasnogamozaopsm 00000H0-mm: mom 000.ma 00w.m 00m.m 0m ncflmbopaoosao 0H00u05>:o-0 mom 000.mm 000.0 000.0 am 00000on 00000Ho mom 000m.sa 0000.: 0000.: use nwmmmaozconausxomm AiEv ESEHXmE um . fiGH mmmhogu mnmfiogn won: cflwboum EDEHsz mafimbopm MO @5090 m paw mmmaxpocamozdop>m wmoosamumma mo mpoqumpmm coampmmmflm >90pmuom Hmofipmo meow H> mammH 92 TABLE VII Cotton Effects of L-Polypeptides and UDP-glucose Pyrophosphorylase Confirmation or trough, mu crossover, mu peak, mu T Protein ’ b 232-253 ~22h 0 Helixa 198-199 é 182-18h vv190 i D 229-230 ~22O B-forma 205 'vl90 rvl96 258 (small) 228 (small) Coila 198 eon-205 189 Poly-L-prolinea 210 205 19h UDP—glucose Perphosphorylase 252 222 202 aValues taken from Yang (92). bWith a shoulder near 215 mu. 95 212 mu shoulder presumably indicates the presence of some helical regions. Thus, the present hypothesis is that the pyrophosphorylase may contain a-helical, random coil, and B-regions. Substantiating evidence from infrared spectroscopy would be informative. In view of the possible presence of structures other than the a-helix and random coil, semiquantitative estimates of helicity must be viewed with some reservation. However, all facts indicated 05 that the enzyme is a protein of relatively low helical content. ‘-1 Discrepancies in the calculated helical content were noted using 8 different methods of calculation and this fact might be a i further indication of the presence of structures other than the a ‘ d—helix and random coil. The denatured perphosphorylase exhibited the typical optical rotatory dispersion spectrum of randomly coiled polypeptides and proteins. Furthermore, a ho of 0 (A0 of 212 mu) is interpreted to indicated the lack of helical regions. Titration of the sulfhydryl groups of the pyrophosphorylase with DTNB and PMB has resulted in some interesting findings. The rapidity of the reaction of the cysteine residues of the native protein at a given pH with DTNB indicated that some of these groups were quite available to solvent, and presumably they are on the surface of the protein or in a cleft. The gradual increase in the number of titratable SH groups with this reagent suggested ! a pH-dependent conformational change that resulted in an opening of the protein structure at high pH to make more SH groups available for titration. The magnitude of this conformational change must be small because little change was noted in the 9h sedimentation coefficient in this pH range. The observed difference in the absolute number of groups titrated with different prepar- ations might indicate that some were more highly oxidized than others. There appeared to be a decrease in the number of titratable SH groups with increasing age of the preparation. However, the maximum number of 16 moles of SH per mole of protein was found for some preparations that were a year old. The fact that 70% of the control activity was maintained after 16 cysteine groups were titrated with DTNB indicates that the sulfhydryl groups are presumably not essential for activity. The value for the cysteine content which was determined on a limited number of preparations was lower when PMB was used as the titrant than when DTNB was used. Two residues per subunit were found with DTNB while 1.0 to 1.5 residues per subunit was found with PMB. The reason for the lower value with PMB is as yet uncertain, but may reflect the possible oxidation problem that has been mentioned for the DTNB titrations or perhaps neighboring group influence on the reactability of the various sulfhydryl groups. It is clear that more preparations need to be titrated with PMB. Nothing abnormal was noted in the amino acid composition of the pyrophosphorylase. As expected from other proteins, glutamic and aspartic acids were present in the largest amount and cysteine and tryptOphan, followed by methionine, were present in the lowest amounts. There was no detectable carbohydrate material bound to the purified protein. The calculated partial specific volume of 0.739 ml/gm is also to be expected for an average globular protein. If; I a .i’ 95 Since the analytical ultracentrifuge data indicated that the subunits of the enzyme were similar in mass, if not identical, experiments were performed to assess the further likelihood that they are chemically identical. Electrophoresis on cellulose acetate strips indicated that the subunits were similar, if not identical, in charge. Furthermore, polyacrylamide gel electro- phoresis, a method which is dependent on both charge and mass, s indicated that the subunits were similar in these respects. The unequivocal interpretation of a single species suffers from the fact that polyacrylamide patterns of the intact protein which V533; was in the native state, denatured, or derivatized always yielded material at the origin and in the sample gel. Fingerprinting experiments were also performed to assess the likelihood of subunit homology. From the known specificity of trypsin for lysine and arginine residues and from the number of these residues present, one would expect 512 peptides if there were no repeating sequences in the primary structure. Fifty-two to sixty-two ninhydrin Spots were observed. Thus, one-eighth to one-tenth the number of ninhydrin spots that would have been expected if there were no repeating sequence was observed. This result is consistent with eight to ten homologous subunits and is in good agreement with the prediction of eight subunits by other methods. The number of observable arginine-containing spots varied somewhat from preparation to preparation, but the higher values are consistent with nine to ten homologous subunits. A lower than expected number of tryptOphan-containing peptides was observed. Several explanations may account for this. First, the 96 two methods used for tryptophan analysis have been shown to be unreliable in some instances (95). Other explanations might be that the two or three residues of tryptophan were located on the same peptide or free tryptophan, or a very small peptide containing tryptophan, occurred because of an unusual sequence and was not detected. Still a further possibility might be that not all the tryptophan-containing peptides gave a positive test with Ehrlich's reagent. Due to the fact that a lower than expected number of tryptophan spots was observed and the number of arginine-containing spots varied, the conclusion of eight to ten homologous subunits muSt be viewed cautiOusly. However, the results do not negate this possibility. Cyanogen bromide cleavage yielded lO-ll bands which were observed on polyacrylamide gel columns. From the number of fragments, the specificity of cyanogen bromide for methionine peptides, and the number of these residues per mole, eight extremely homologous, if not identical, subunits were again postulated. For this conclusion, complete cleavage of the methionine bonds and complete reduction and S—carboxymethylation of all disulfide linkages was assumed. This fact has been demonstrated by Steers 3; £1. for B—galactosidase (69) using the same cleavage system. When monitored on polyacrylamide gel columns, the presence of a second faint band for the RSCM- perphosphorylase was found. In light of the single diffuse band found for the underivatized subunits, this is not yet understood. —-‘- ~fl0'r40nur. y 97 Electrofocusing experiments, on the other hand, indicated the enzyme was heterogeneous in 6 M urea. At least eight fractions could be detected. These results are compatible with: (1) the presence of differently charged subunits which were present in varying amounts, (2) nonequivalent binding of small ions to a single identical subunit, or (5) modification of the protein due possibly to proteolytic digestion during fractionation. It appeared from the electrofocusing experiments that at least four fractions have the competence to form active pyrophosphorylase molecules with approximately equal specific activities. These preliminary results do not in themselves rule out the possibility of chemically identical subunits. Reassociation experiments demonstrated that active enzyme could be reconstituted from a sample denatured in 8 M urea. There was a strong pH dependence on the reassociation process, and presumably the higher recovery at more alkaline pH can be correlated with the alkaline pH stability range of the protein (28). The high recovery in these preliminary experiments was encouraging because of the prospects for further optimizing the yield of active enzyme. Furthermore, the high recovery of the perphos— phorylase activity demonstrated an important biochemical principle, which is that the information necessary for the proper tertiary structure of some proteins resides in the linear sequence of their component amino acids. SUMMARY Uridine diphosphate glucose pyrophosphorylase which was recrystallized as many as six times exhibited molecular poly- F dispersity. Analysis in the ultracentrifuge pointed to the ;.3 presence of polymers. The molecular weight of the principal i component was estimated from sedimentation and diffusion analysis and found to be about h80,000. This molecular weight a ) was roughly substantiated by low speed sedimentation equilibrium analysis. I In the solvent system containing 6 M guanidine hydrochloride and 0.1 M mercaptoethanol, pyrophosphorylase subunits were produced that had a molecular weight of about 68,000 with a value of 0.7h ml/gm for 6 (60,000 with a G of 0.72 ml/gm). The pyrophosphorylase exhibited a typical aromatic amino acid spectrum, and the extinction coefficient was determined with concomitant dry-weighing experiments. Optical rotatory dispersion 1 studies indicated a low helical content with the possibility of I some B-structure regions. Chemical studies demonstrated a typical protein amino acid content withou:bound carbohydrate material. The total number of cysteine groups which would readily react with Ellman's reagent was pH dependent. Although the number of SH groups per mole appeared to depend on the preparation chosen and possibly its age, a maximum of about 2 per subunit was obtained. Other 99 methods have indicated the possibility of a larger number for the total half—cystine analysis. Polyacrylamide and cellulose acetate electrOphoresis, and cyanogen bromide digestions were consistent with subunit homology, if not identity. Certain aspects of the fingerprinting experiments also supported this hypothesis, but due to the variance in the arginine-containing spots and the observation of a lower than I”? expected number of tryptophan-containing spots, the results are less conclusive. Preliminary electrofocusing experiments indicated the presence of different electrOphoretic species under denaturing conditions. a The subunits produced in urea appeared to be catalytically inactive, but active pyrophosphorylase was able to be reconstituted with a high overall yield. 10. ll. l2. 15. 1h. 15. l6. l7. 18. REFERENCES Newfeld, E. F., and Hassid, W. Z., Advan. Carbohydrate Chem., 1Q, 509 (1965). Cabib, E., Ann. Rev. Biochem., 52, 55h (1965). Ginsburg, V., Advan. Enzymol., 26, 55 (196A). Neufeld, E. F., and Ginsburg, V., Ann. Rev. Biochem., 55, 601 (1965). Caputto, R., Leloir, L. F., Trucco, R. E., Cardini, C. E., and Paladini, A. C., J. Biol. Chem., 179, h97 (19h9). Caputto, R., Leloir, L. F., Cardini, C.-E., and Paladini, A. C., J. Biol. Chem., 18A, 555 (1950). Kalckar, H. M., and Cutolo, E., IIe Congr. Intern. de Biochemie, Paris, 260 (1952). Munch-Petersen, A., Kalckar, H. M., Cutolo E., and Smith, E. E. B., Nature, 172, 1056 (1955). Kornberg, A., J. Biol. Chem., 176, 1u75 (19u8). Kornberg, A., J. Biol. Chem., 182, 779 (1950). Schrecker, A. W., and Kornberg, A., J. Biol. Chem., 182, 795 1950 . Munch-Peterson, A., Acta Chem. Scand., 2, 1525 (1955). Kalckar, H. M., Braganca, B., and Munch-Peterson, A., Nature, 172, 1058 (1953). "" Smith, E. E. B., and Mills, G. T., Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 15, 586 (195A). Smith, E. E. B., and Mills, G. T., Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 18, 152 (1955). Burma, D. P. and Mortimer, D. C., Arch. Biochem. and Biophys., 62, 16 (1956). Neufeld, E. F., Ginsburg, V., Putnam, E. W., Fanshier D., and Hassid, W. Z., Arch. Biochem. Biophys., 62, 602 (1957). Ginsburg, V., J. Biol. Chem., 252, 55 (1958). 19. 20. 21. 22. 25. 2h. 25. 26. 27. 28. 29. 50. 51. 52. 35. 5h. 55- 36. 37. 58. 59. 101 Ganguli, N. c., J. Biol. Chem., 252, 557 (1958). Turner, D. H., and Turner, J. F., Biochem. J., 62, hh8 (1958). Villar-Palasi, C., and Larner, J., Arch. Biochem. Biophys., 86, 61 (1960). Basu, D. K., and Bachhawat, B. K., J. Neurochem., 1, 17h (1961). Anderson, E. P., Kalckar, H. M., Kurahashi, K., and Isselbacher, K. J., J. Lab. Clin. Med., 50, h69 (1957). - Seits, I. F., Luganova, I. S., and Vladimivova, A. D., Biokhimiya, 28, 295 (1965). Blinov, M. N., Vopr. Med. Khim., 19, 165 (196M). Hal rin, K. M., and Ohkawara, A., J. Invest. Dermatol., £6, A5 1966). Kamogawa, A., and Kurahashi, K., J. Biochem., 51, 758 (1965). Albrecht, G. J., Bass, S. T., Seifert, L. L., and Hansen, R. G., J. Biol. Chem., 2&1, 2968 (1966) DeFazio, K., Master of Science thesis, Michigan State University, 1968. Knop, J., Master of Science thesis, Michigan State University, 1969. Bass, S. T., and Hansen, R. G., in preparation. Gillett, T. A., and Hansen, R. G., in preparation. Isselbacher, K. J., J. Biol. Chem., 252, h29 (1958). Isselbacher, K. J., Science, 127, 28 (1958). Gitzelman, R., personal communication to R. G. Hansen, Sept. 1968. Abraham, H. D., and Howell, R. R., J. Biol. Chem., 2hh, 5h5 (1969). Ting, W. K., and Hansen, R. G., Proc. Soc. Exptl. Biol. Med., 127, 960 (1968). Gillett, T. A., Levine, S. L., and Hansen, R. G., in preparation. Lowry, 0. H., Rosebrough, N. J., Farr, A. L., and Randall, R. J., J. Biol. Chem., 195, 265 (1951). MO. hl. #2. hi. uh. MS. M6. AT. AB. M9. 50. 51. 52. 55. 5h. 55- 56. 57. 58. 59. 60. 102 Warburg, 0., and Christian, W., Biochem. Z., 510, 58h (l9hl). Dubois, K. A., Gilles, K. A., Hamilton, J. K., Rebers, P. A., and Smith, F., Anal. Chem., 26, 550 (1956). Schachman, H. K., Methods Enzymol., E, 2 (1957). Van Holde K. E., and Baldwin, R. L., J. Phys. Chem., 6g, 75h (1958). Svedberg, T., and Pedersen, K. 0., The Ultracentrifuge, London, Oxford University, Clarendon Press, l9h0. Kawahara, K., and Tanford, C., J. Biol. Chem., 2hl, 5288 gig (1966). g Steinmetz, M. A., and Deal, W. C., Jr., Biochemistry, 6, 1599 (1966). Dorsey, N. E., Prgerties of Ordinary Water-Substance, y Reinhold, New York, 280 (19h0). Hooker, T. M., Jr., Doctor of Philosophy thesis, Duke University, 1966. Tanford, C., Kawahara, K., Lapanje, S., Hooker, T. M., Jr., Zarlengo, M. H., Salahuddin, A., Aune, K., and Takagi, T., J. Am. Chem. 300., 89, 5025 (1967). Moffitt, W., and Yang, J. T., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S., .53. 596 (1956). Ellman, G. L., Arch. Biochem. Biophys., 6g, 70 (1959). Kemp, R. G., and Forest, P. B., Biochemistry, 1, 2596 (1968). Boyer, P. D., J. Am. Chem. 809,, 16, A551 (l95h). Benesch, R., and Benesch, R. A., Methods Biochem. Anal., 16, 60 (1962). Moore, 8., and Stein, W. H., in Methods in Enzymology, Colowick, S. P., and Kaplan, N. 0., editors, Academic Press Inc., New York, 819 (1965). Piez, K. A., and Morris, L., Anal. Biochem., 1, 187 (1960). Spackman, D. H., Stein, W. H., and Moore, 8., Anal. Chem., 29. 1190 (1958). Spies, J. R., and Chambers, D. C., Anal. Chem., 66, 50 (l9h8). Spies, J. R., and Chambers, D. C., Anal. Chem., 16, l2h9 (l9h9). Goodwin, T. W., and Morton, R. A., Biochem. J., MO. 628 (19h6). 61. 62. 65. 6h. 653 66. 67. 68. 69. 70. 71. 72. 75. 7h. 75- 76. 77. 78. 79- 80. 81. 105 Crestfield, A. M., Moore, 8., and Stein, W. H., J. Biol. Chem., 258, 622 (1965). Svensson, H., Arch. Biochem. Biophys., Suppl. 1, 152 (1962). Vesterberg, 0., and Svensson, H., Acta Chem. Scand., 26, 820 (1966). Ingram, V. M., Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 28, 559 (1958). Katz, A. M., Dreyer, W. J., and Anfinsen, C. B., J. Biol. Chem., 25A, 2897 (1959). Smith, I. Nature, 171, A5 (1955). Bennett, J. C., in Methods of Enzymology, Colowick, S. P., and Kaplan, N. O., editors, Academic Press Inc., New York,550 (1968). Gross, E” and Witkop, B., J. Biol. Chem., 257, 1856 (1962). Steers, E., Jr., Craven, G. R., Anfinsen, C. B., and Bethune, J. L., J. Biol. Chem., 2h0, 2h78 (1965). Davis, B. J., Ann. N. Y., Acad. Sci., 121, hon (196A). Deal, W. C., Jr., Biochemistry, in press. Yang, J. T., and Doty, P., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 19, 761 (1957). Drude, P., Lehrbuch der Optik, 2nd ed., S. Hirzel Verlag, Leipzig, 1906T7 Urnesj P., and Doty, P., Advances in Protein Chem., 16, h01 (1961 . Blout, E. R., in Optical Rotatory Dispersion, Djerassi, C., editor, McGraw-Hill, New York, 258 (1960). Sogami, M., Leonard, W. L., Jr., and Foster, J. F., Arch. Biochem. Biophys., 100, 206 (1965). Yang, J. T., and McCabe, W. J., Biopolymers, 2, 209 (1965). Blout, F. R., Schmier, I., and Simmons, N. S., J. Am. Chem. Soc., §1: 5195 (1962). McMeekin, T. L., and Marshall, K., Science, 116, 1&2 (1952). Cohn, E. J., and Edsall, J. T., eds., Proteins, Amino Acids and Peptides, Reinhold, New York, 570 (l9h5). Levine, S., Gillett, T. A., Hageman, E., and Hansen, R. G., J. Biol. Chem., in press. Jn‘i‘. ... ...-4 F“- b 82. 85. 8h. 85. 86. 87. 88. 89. 90. 91. 92. 95. 10h Kielley, W. W., and Harington, W. F., Biochim. Biophys. Acta., 3;, u01 (1960). Noelken, M. E., Federation Proc., 86, 777 (1967). Marler, E., Nelson, C. A., and Tanford, C., Biochemistry, 8, 279 (196A). Hade,)E. P. K., and Tanford, C., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 89, 505A 1967 . Castellino, F. J., and Barker, R., Biochemistry, Z, 2207 (1968). Edelstein, S. J., and Schachman, H. K., Federation Proc., 82, 12u8 (1966). Hunter, M. J., J. Phys. Chem., 19, 5285 (1966). Taylor, J. F., and Lowry, C., Biochim. Biophys. Acta., 88, 109 1956 . Reithel, F. J., and Sakora, J. D., J. Phys. Chem., 61, 2h97 1965 . JirgenSons, B., J. Biol. Chem., 210, 106A (1965). Yang, J. T., in Poly-d-Amino Acids, Vol. I, Fasman, G. D., and Timasheff, S. N., editors, Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York, Chapter 6 (1967). Light, A., and Smith,E. L., in The Proteins, Vol. 1, Ed. 2, Neurath, H., editor, Academic Press, New York, 1 (1965). -.. L.” T‘L-‘M—‘ru