-.-.' ‘ . . .h . " ‘ J v A: v ,1 I 4. .‘v - V 1‘ u THESIS This is to certify that the thesis entitled EXPERIMENTAL VERIFICATION OF THE NEUBER RELATION AT ROOM AND ELEVATED TEMPERATURES presented by Lonnie J. Lucas has been accepted towards fulfillment of the requirements for Master's degreein Mechanics / J /%4 GM, fl Major professor Datflg/aQNM 0-7 639 “3&53521' «5m '5' ' “ " M. A rm Esme U m v crafty OVERDUE FINES: 25¢ per day per item RETURNING LIBRARY MATERIALS: Place 1n book return to remove charge from circulation records 6 #74 ‘07 EXPERIMENTAL VERIFICATION OF THE NEUBER RELATION AT ROOM AND ELEVATED TEMPERATURES BY Lonnie J. Lucas A THESIS Submitted to Michigan State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE Department of Metallurgy, Mechanics and Materials Science 1982 ABSTRACT EXPERIMENTAL VERIFICATION OF THE NEUBER RELATION AT ROOM AND ELEVATED TEMPERATURES BY Lonnie J. Lucas The accuracy of the Neuber equation at room temperature and l,200°F was experimentally determined under cyclic load conditions with hold times. All strains were measured with an interferometric technique at both the local and remote regions of notched specimens. At room temperature, strains were obtained for the initial response at one load level and for cyclically stable conditions at four load.Levels. Stress- es in notched members were simulated by subjecting smooth specimens to the same strains as were recorded on the notch- ed specimen. Local stress-strain response was then predict- ed with excellent accuracy by subjecting a smooth specimen to limits established by the Neuber Equation. Data at l,200°F were obtained with the same experimental techniques but only in the cyclically stable conditions. The Neuber prediction at this temperature gave relatively accurate re- sults in terms of predicting stress and strain points. However, predicted interaction of the creep and stress relaxation behavior differed from experimentally measured values. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This thesis project was funded by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. I would like to thank my wife, Beth, for her help during the period of this work. I would also like to thank Shari Sawdey and Michelle Ward for their help in preparing the figures and typing. A special thank you goes to Dr. John Martin who is an excellent teacher, advisor and friend. TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . LIST OF FIGURES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Chapter 1 Chapter 2 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 Chapter 3 Chapter 4 4.1 4.2 4.3 4.4 Chapter 5 5.1 5.2 5.3 5.4 INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . INTERFEROMETRIC STRAIN GAGE . . . . . . Fundamentals of the I.S.G. . . . . . . . Hardware and Software for the I.S.G. . . The I.S.G. at Elevated Temperatures . . Comparison Test . . . . . . . . . . . . SAMPLES AND MATERIALS . . . . . . . . . EXPERIMENTAL METHODS . . . . . . . . . Strain Measurement in Notched Specimens Simulation of Stresses in Notched SpeCimns O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 Elevated Temperature Tests . . . . . . . 4.3.1 Elevated Temperature Stress Simulation . . . . . . . . . . . Neuber Prediction of Notch Root Behavior EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS AND DISCUSSION . . Room Temperature I.S.G. Measurements . . Room Temperature Stress Simulation . . . Room Temperature Neuber Prediction . . . High Temperature I.S.G. Strain Measurements . . . . . . . . . . . . . ii Page iv 14 23 25 33 33 37 39 41 45 52 52 60 66 70 5.5 High Temperature Stress Simulation 5.6 High Temperature Neuber Prediction Chapter 6 CONCLUSIONS . LIST OF REFERENCES iii Page 78 84 89 90 LIST OF TABLES Table Page 1 Material Properties . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26 iv Figure 10 11 12 l3 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 LIST OF FIGURES Fringe Pattern Generation Principles . . . . Interference Patterns . . . . . . . . . . . Orientation of Fringe Patterns . . . . . . . Vickers Hardness Tester . . . . . . . . . . Negative Replica of Indentations . . . . . . Schematic of I.S.G. . . . . . . . . . . . . Interferometric Strain Gage . . . . . . . . Interferometric Technique at 1,200°F . . . . Induction Heating Coils . . . . . . . . . . Black-body Radiation Versus Wavelength . . . Fringe Pattern Intensity Signals at 70°F and l'OOOOF o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o Fringe Pattern Intensity Signals at l,lOO°F . Fringe Intensity Before and After Increasing PMT Gain 0 O O O O I O O O O O O O O O O 0 Comparison of I.S.G. and Clip-on Gage Strain output 0 O O O O I O O O O O O O O O O O 0 Smooth Axial Specimen . . . . . . . . . . . Hourglass Specimen . . . . . . . . . . . . . Notched Specimen Geometry . . . . . . . . . Notched Specimen . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Determination of Strain Profile . . . . . . Test set Up 0 O O O O I O O O O O O O O O O Page 10 11 12 13‘ 16 17 19 20 21 22 24 27 28 29 30 32 34 Figure 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 Load Pattern and Recording Technique . . . Spotwelding Thermocouple to Specimen . . . Diametral Extensometer and Hourglass Specimen . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Analog Circuit for Transverse to Axial Strain Conversion . . . . . . . . . . . . Construction of Neuber Versus Time Graph . The Neuber Relation is Defined for Each Seperate Reversal . . . . . . . . . . . . Analog Circuit for Neuber Prediction . . . Room Temperature I.S.G. Strain Measurement versus Load 0 O O O O C I O O O O O O O 0 Load, Notch Root Strain, and Remote Strain Versus Time . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Load Level 1 Versus Strain Across Notched SpeCimen O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 Load Level 2 Versus Strain Across Notched SpeCimen O 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 Load Level 3 Versus Strain Across Notched SpeCimen O I C O O O O I O C O O O O O 0 Load Level 4 Versus Strain Across Notched Specimen . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Smooth Specimen Simulation of Initial Stresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Strain and Simulated Stress for Remote Region 0 O O O O O O O I O O O O O O O 0 Smooth Specimen Simulation of Stabilized Stresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Strain and Simulated Stress for Local Region I O O O O O O I I O O O O O O O O Neuber Prediction Curves for Initial Local BehaVior O O I I O O O O O O O O O O O 0 vi Page 36 40 42 44 46 48 51 54_ 55 56 57 58 59 61 63 64 65 67 Figure 39 4O 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 Neuber Prediction and Stress Simulation of Initial Local Behavior . . . . . . . . . . . Neuber Prediction and Stress Simulation of Stabilized Local Behavior . . . . . . . . . Load Versus Local Strain at 1,200°F . . . . . Load Versus Local Strain at 1,200°F . . . . . Load and Local Strain Versus Time at 1,200°F. Load and Local Strain Versus Time at 1,200°F. Load and Local Strain Versus Time at 1,200°F. Load and Local Strain Versus Time at 1,200°F. Load Versus Remote Strain at 1,200°F . . . . Local Simulated Stress Versus Strain at 1,200°F O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 Local Simulated Stress Versus Strain at 1,200°F O O O C I O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 Local Strain and Simulated Stress at 1,200°F Level 3 O O O O C O O C O O O O O O O O O 0 Remote Simulated Stress Versus Strain at 1,200°F O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 Remote Strain and Simulated Stress at 1,200°F Level 3 O O C O I O O O O O O O O O O O I O Neuber Prediction Curves for Local Level 3 . Neuber Prediction and Stress Simulation at 1,200°F I O I O O O O O O O I O O O O O O O Neuber Prediction and Stress Simulation at l'zoooF O O C O O O O O 0 O O O O O O O O 0 vii Page 68 69 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 79 80 81 82 83 87 88 CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION There has been a demand in recent years for the air- craft industry to provide a more energy efficient turbine propulsion system. Part of this task involves trying to understand the limitations of the current materials and structures being used, especially in the 'hot section' of the engine (l)*. The hot section components include the turbine blades, vanes, and combustors which operate under severe stresses and temperatures. To make improvements in these parts it is first necessary to compile test data which describe the events leading up to failure. Theoretical mod- els can then be developed and compared with experimental data until the failure modes and component lives may be predicted. The combustor, fabricated from the alloy Hastelloy X, is one component which has gone through the initial testing phase and is now being examined from a theoretical stand- point. Failures in the combustor linem'Ihave been attribut- ed to thermal-mechanical fatigue which causes cracking and *Numbers in parenthesis refer to references listed in the reference table. Numbers in brackets refer to equations. buckling (2). A number of constitutive theories have been proposed for predicting the nonlinear stress-strain behavior near holes which serve as cracking sites in the liner (3). When these theories are incorporated into finite element codes, the final package becomes very complex and requires a large computer facility. The purpose of this study is; to examine a more basic theory, namely the Neuber relation, to see how well it can predict local stress-strain behavior in notched speci- mens of Hastelloy X. For cyclic loading the Neuber equation is written, (Ac) (As) = (Kt')2 (AS) (Ae) [11 where: A0 and A5 are the notch root stress and strain ranges, respectively; AS and Ae are the remote stress and strain ranges, respectively; th.is the elastic stress concentration factor. Much of the work involving Neuber's relation has fo- cused on stress redistribution near a notch (4) and the accompanying variation in the stress and strain concentra- tion factors throughout fatigue life (5,6,7). One of these researchers, Guillot (6), evaluated Neuber's equation at moderately elevated temperatures (500°F) and found that conservative results were obtained for life predictions in 1018 steel and 7475 aluminum. Both Bofferding (5) and Guillot (6) used an Interferometric Strain Gage (I.S.G.) (8-11) to measure notch root strains. Equation [1] by itself is indeterminate. Knowing the remote stress or strain range leaves three unknowns. The relationship between stress and strain at both the remote and local locations is needed. Crews and Hardrath (12) assumed that the notch stress could be found by reproduc- ing measured notch strains in smooth samples. This assump- tion was upheld by Stadnick (13) and other researchers (14,15) who showed that the smooth specimen simulation gave good results in predicting fatigue lives of notched specimens. For this study it was assumed that smooth speci- mens could be used to supply the needed stress-strain re- lationship. Stadnick and Morrow (16) worked on automating the techniques for performing tests on smooth specimens that were controlled according to the Neuber Equation. They evaluated various approaches for subjecting a smooth speci- men to the same stresses and strains which would exist at a notch. These methods consisted of manual control, and analog or digital computer control of the Neuber parameters. Separate research efforts have been devoted to using smooth specimens to simulate notch root response, develop- ing laser based measurement devices and establishing high temperature testing techniques. This study utilized all of these tools to determine the accuracy of Neuber's equa- tion for cyclic loading of notched specimens at temperatures up to 1,200°F. CHAPTER 2 INTERFEROMETRIC STRAIN GAGE 2.1 Fundamentals of the I.S.G. The Interferometric Strain Gage is a noncontacting laser device capable of measuring strains Over a very short gage length (SO-100 microns). Figure 1 illustrates the fundamental principles upon which the I.S.G. is designed. This cut—away view shows two surface indentations which form the gage length on a specimen. Parallel rays reflect- ing off the indentations have a path difference of d sina, where a is the angle between the normal incident laser beam and the light rays of interest. When the following relation is satisfied, d sino = mA (m = 0, i l, i 2,...) [l] where: A = wavelength of laser light the laser rays will interfere constructively to form bright interference fringes such as those in Figure 2. Each bright fringe is defined by an integer, m, from Equation [1]. The orientation of the fringe patterns with respect to the laser is shown in Figure 3. Incident Laser Beam FIGURE 1 FRINGE PATTERN GENERATION PRINCIPLES FIGURE 2 INTERFERENCE PATTERNS wzmmhhmpmzomo zmzlomam SLIOFoz NH mm=m_a Zr “zommmmqu 11” s j 1.. _ . . . _ n _ . _ _ _ . _ . . . _ . _ _ . . _ .. .1 . .52 com. It! All . . mN.m <3 cm . I/uf .. III. mm; H. - ‘ I'LIIDI. mNHd _ mmmd omé * _ . oomé ._ _ I _ . Izwfl-w\m _ u M n " l-J" " m .H _ . n _ k u H .rIIe L S ‘ 30 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII ne'er-o one-0.9 IILIIIIIIIIILI aaa'ovao IIII-IHIIHIIHHIlI11111111 aaa‘ovo? oaao‘aroo oaaa’llvao FIGURE 18 NOTCHED SPECIMEN 31 placed across the width of a notched specimen. Room tem- perature strain measurements were made at each of these locations while cycling well below the proportional limit. The actual strain data and the calculated strain profile are both shown. By taking the ratio of strains at location #5 and location #1, the strain concentration factor was determined. For elastic strains, the stress and strain concentration factors are equal (21). Using this informa- tion the experimental stress concentration factor, Kt' , was determined 0§:'= 2.27). This experimentally determined value oflq:'as well as the designations for the remote and local areas (locations #5 and #1) were used throughout the test program. It should be noted that the I.S.G. was used to measure both local and remote strains for evaluating the Neuber equation. Other investigators (5,6) have restricted load levels to insure that the remote region remained linearly elastic. This allowed the remote strain to be calculated by knowing the stress in the net section and the modulus of elasticity. In this experiment, the complications of de- fining a net section stress were avoided since the remote strain was measured directly. There were also no limitations on plasticity in the remote region. This allowed the Neuber relation to be evaluated over a greater range of loading conditions. 132 LOAD VS. ELASTIC STRAIN AT FIVE LOCATIONS T--,I. . “ . . F."f1‘lf:i 1 ? 37-1 1 . i A ‘ r“ I .'_‘. 225-13“.- .‘I _ In 1-1.-. \OUTSIDE EDGE OF ~ g; 3 ‘ ' EDGE narcn .001, ,gf~i i . j! I “ ‘f I . 11‘ ,_ 1/F‘ ‘“‘ ' I ”' 1- 11/1/ I '1 - 111- LOCATIONS: #1 #2 #3 #4 #5 I: O ‘3 . . II“: _ g 2.27 0 8 O U Q Q I) H U m .-I 0 0 g 1.0“ J. I 0 3. IE .05 1.05 2.05 4.05 6.025 DISTANCE FRW EDGE OF NOTCH ( Milli-meters) FIGURE 19 DETERMINATION OF STRAIN PROFILE CHAPTER 4 EXPERIMENTAL METHODS 4.1 Strain Measurement in Notched Specimens This chapter describes the methods which were used to determine the stresses and strains in notched specimens. SectionsI4.land 4.2 refer to room temperature testing techniques while Section 4.3 gives a description of experi- mental methods used for running tests at 1,200°F. The Neuber prediction tests at room temperature and 1,200°F are explained in Section 4.4. A computer controlled, MTS closed-loop testing machine was used to perform all of the tests. The loading capacity of the system was 12 Kips. Figure 20 shows the test set up. A woods metal gripping arrangement was employed so that specimens could be mounted in a stress free condition. Forone of the room temperature tests, five sets of indenta- tions were placed on a notched specimen at the locations described in Figure 19. After the specimen was mounted, the laser of the I.S.G. was focused on the set of indenta- tions nearest the edge of the notch. Several parameters were then adjusted so that the I.S.G. would function pro- perly. The gain and offset controls for the servo mirrors 33 34 ‘I‘a: .smy "I. 539$ 3.: 7a a: cum Hmmh om mm:o_a I11 058m 9.2.qu /IIli.[I 35 were set so that the fringe patterns were sweeping symmetri- cally across the photomultiplier tubes. The electronic analog of the fringe patterns was viewed on an oscillo- scope until all adjustments had been properly made. A function generator was then programmed to output a symmetric ramp loading pattern voltage. The loading pattern and the recording set up is illustrated in Figure 21. The time for loading between tensile and compressive peaks was set at 20 seconds with a 100 second hold time between peaks. A dual pen recorder was used to plot both the load pattern and the resulting strain response versus time. Another plotted X-Y data of load versus strain. Load and notch root strain were recorded for the first six reversals of loading in order to obtain the initial response of the material. Hastelloy X is a cyclically hardening alloy which reaches a stable condition quite rapidly. Taking this information into account, the speci- men was run for fifty additional reversals of loading until the strain responseluni stabilized. Load and strain values were then recorded for several reversals of loading to des- cribe the stable condition of the material. With the material fully stabilized, the I.S.G. was focused on the set of indentations which was second farth- est from the notch. (See Figure 19 for location #2). Load and strain data were again obtained for several re- versals of loading. Similar measurements were performed at locations #3, #4, and #5. At that point, the level of 36 m:a_zzumh oz_nmoumm az< zmwhk7 VIII \\. 1 guy \I/> \ C < 2.... zou z_mz flunuum ouoflou nauhum «cc. on: . -> :«qum uoom :Uuoz aoxou- n «a; 30: auto- on 56 zmz_uwsm nmxupoz mwomu< z_ a 1u>m1 a N 1m>m1 a M .._m>w.._ 9‘0..— Nm mmaw11 . .«1. 11“ 1.1..‘fi11q u. ..14. «.1..1.1. .1 . . 11¢. . 1 .. .-..H. .1.” .. .1 1 .T11.1...1.41 1 1 .. .. ... M... 7 . a. ... 1 ... 1.11 1.. 1M. .. . .1 ..—1 ~ 1.1 .. . .. 1 . .1 . . 1 . . . W. m.. .1 ..«1 ..fi ..H ... . . 1 .1. . ._ .... 1 .. . . ..1 ., . . . .... . .. 1 1 . . .11. . . 1 . .. 1.. . .. . 1. . . . 1 . . 1. 1. . . .. . . 1 A‘Volj‘-..15‘ .1 v ... o 4..1v?1V1’¢t II;‘ ‘04 11 v 1‘_ n v. .1. . .1 4 ovj‘. >‘V'T alJIJ.‘ .I . Vt» 910i? .nib, a.1.‘\|.1£50- . olulvl . i.lfl.. 11!; .. _ .. .. . 1 1. $852 202.33 x 1 .. . a... 1 . ..1 1. “1 1. . . 1 . . .1 _. . .. . ..1 . H . . . _ .. . . .. 11.. . ... . . 1. . . 1 . . . . . 1 . .. .. 1 . 1 . .. . . . . 1 1 . . 1 1 . 1 1 1 1 1 1 . . 1 1 1 4 r ..All’ 011‘ 4 116 ..li». .» ro 10.09.. .1». >1. ?|.: t .. l ....I 1‘ [FIG ..... If . 71.1-1.1..1‘colt ‘1 c v15! '1' 1...!‘4’...’ .1.. . . .. 4. . a . . 4.1 .._1 1 . w . _ . . 1 fl . fi u .1. . : .. 1. . 1 1. 1 1 . 1... . .. ... .1 1 . . _ n H1“. 1 ..1. 1 ~_. .. u ~ . _ . 4V1? 4 .r5.lc¢ 4.9.0.10 . 1 .1 Q.- vv .-.-_._. . . _ we . .11. .... 1 1 . . ..1 1. .11. .. 1- . H... 1 .1 . .. r L p 0! GILT ‘I' v ‘I— .K 7...; . It! A u: . I... 1 V \ —.q||lv .2. . .1 1 .. 1 1. . . 1 1.1. . A .. . . ..1. . . 1. . . . _ .o4. . . . .. arwAV .9. ......) .. . . ... .... .. ‘ a. 1. . . ..1 . .1 . . m. ....1 o .y . .. _ . . . . 11v? .1 . . . r. K \ .. . 11:11 ...; 5-1117! I ‘ ... 1 TA 4 It ‘9 t . l. yin! . . I. IOIO\ . . In-.. .« .w Vfi‘l l 1111. 1 1 . ._. 1 . . 1 \ . . . . 1 . . .7. . \ .1. \.. .. ! ... . 1 1 . _ . _ ....1 1. . . . a . . , yr1+ ~ < Y . .1. IL ..‘1. 1 . . . . 1 1 1 . 1 .15.-..1 7’1‘1 TV1IQ v.91... 719.191 v ‘ _.-. -..-.. lull. - -. wm~fi—v~o———-———--—-T ..- ._ - -... 1 _ 59 “-1.—...- - ._ ... zm21ummm 11 _ . 1 . T 1 L .1 . . 1 n. _ .... «1 .1 1 . . . 1m .1 .1 1W 1* ._ 1 nuIUPoz mmo¢u< z1 : 1m>w1 n V .a Locsl Response ‘1 . ..1” I}. I . i 4-... ' . 4H- Losd Love 1 1 F? Losd 1..ng 2 71"? Lodeevel 3 - ".“.7. I , . u.'g:-f Z'T‘ZIL‘Y'"' , . .1 ,A p _ . ... . FIGURE 36 SMOOTH SPECIMEN SIMULATION OF STABILIZED STRESSES 65 c uo>od used a #0909 vice n uo>oa Quad zo_owx 4<:wm 4m=u zo_hu_nmzm mmmamz wm wzao~m 03.2. 3°: ao\uoo on u< o< goofing: 83. usuuo>ux sue assuo>o¢ sue ao\oon n assuo>om sun assho>oz can Au$Ao$ 00095 0< a<:mm .._~—-.I __1 I I . . I . I ,I A . _ . . . . ~3.004 .-w---- . ..V._ W V V I _ _ *1 _ n w. I n ‘ o . . : I_-__.. ——-*r- ...__~._.__ ‘-— . l . I ....~... _ II .‘I ‘1 I-_g-”.-el ......_..A -J Load Level 4 .2 IILiIIII LOAD VERSUS LOCAL STRAIN AT 1,200°F FIGURE 42 73 macaw; 2 ms; .322, 2.5.5 453 nz< 9.6.. m: 352.“. uauh Vac: u uo>oa cued onoon on cued ax ON Eo\uon n 74 “_OOON‘H ._.< mt; w3m¢m> z—Sfim ._od was clan. 30m 58: 8o. cued 5— ON sax on. n 75 mooo~.H p< mz_h m=m¢m> z_<¢»m 4oa clog m: maze—m 76 m ooNAH h< m:_h m=m¢m> z_<¢»w 40A 060A 95H use: Eu\oon on au\oun n 77 “_oOONAH ...d. z~0J N H0>01H u .., ; l _ m . . .e. e y n m u _ I . 7 9+1!!! 1m I ll IIYJX - .1.. 919.1 . 1!: m .V m . .h .. . 4 i. _ . . .7 - w H . ., M -4394, A a _ _ ,” fi , M .... 4:3: . _ Ugo. w e A; A . . . a — 61¢; 1 fiol 1 A m . 455." . f - LJ.§.§ 1 I _ , ”4 MW . . . I n :.Y‘..Dr« ,« 4ll‘ M g m H mm a; : .. .:_ l “311% 3:3. m ., H ”x .: 78 1.0% in both tension and compression during Load Level 4. The interferometric strain measurements were consistant even for these high strain ranges. The remote data for the stabilized material exhibited much less creep and plastic strain. The load versus strain plots from each of the four load levels are shown in Figure 47. (Note: the four load levels used during the elevated temperature tests were different than the levels used at room temperature.) The amount of creep during the hold times was very small. 5.5 High Temperature Stress Simulation The measured remote and local strains shown in Section. 5.4 were imposed on an hourglass specimen at 1,200°F. The hourglass specimen was cyclically stabilized before perform- ing the stress simulation. The resulting stress versus strain curves for stable notch root response at four dif- ferent load levels are plotted in Figures 48 and 49. The relationship between stress and strain in time is illustrat- ed in Figure 50 for Load Level 3. The increase in strain which was imposed during the hold period helped to balance the stress relaxation of the material. At Levels 1 and 2 there is almost no stress relaxation while Levels 3 and 4 show just a slight amount. The remote data from the stress simulation ii; plotted in Figure 51. The time plot for Level 3 stresses and strains is shown in Figure 52. Very little creep had been measured 79 1, 200°F .... I . ... . r I. l _ ,_. W L , ... r _ . , .. . . _ m ~.-fl HIIJI i . . w .tei- .fi :lTI ‘ . . . . ,. L, “ _ _ .m . _ ._ . I -1-- .--I..-,I.III.+IIIII-.I-.1- ....ILIIL- -II.I.I-II..I-II.-.I~, . I M u ”w. XIX”? L n w. M . .. .7. . H L . _, “ wa..a. h 4.1”. M . H. _ .I/L L H . M _.“::.g..g - . -«...I:.J - ._ f . M f. :;: . .-.. “ n _ _ . h t . .... ,1 h n. . vol-I Illllnfibldlbl .lc‘oo v-6 1..-“Io .- 11v. I II ml): 4 T! .1175! .I S 4 L . . , . M , . . . l . . H 1.4” ~ ~ . H . . , w . . _ . . I A . , ........... .. . * .n .. w m . . Ifjw. . . a ...fi.._. H _ n _ . . , ml .. . _ A I 1747+ r r leIl OlI II O '75.... ‘.I H . ’11 M _ ....... H“. ” ... if , W . / _ . N L. .l M . U . fI 1.1-1.... III+ II I- .. LI ....-. .I + _ L _ _ u _ ,1 a ; ‘E _ _. . L~ O. . . . 1 V .m .9 a v. . . ~ . . Av, , . 4.0. “I! .IHH 71 1 Olw. H c.- 1 lo . M Y . _ . . . ... :...: e _ e .. . M . . / . w v _ I: _ I R . I1 4. ...! l.lTl|l0Il.on H I. L _ . . _ “ . . . _ _ Mal . U a. ., . , _ . . . . . . II d 1+4... ..I. . . .... .. .m . . .M./ . . a soiv IIJI I. a“ i..l'iI../-Tols' II M W .m _ .r : _ L x w _t. o . , r . _ .IIII L Illa-1.4 I. .9 l4” ‘lIOA‘X. . ..oo. W.... ‘ 6 1.- u 4 . ., , _ L _ n L L . . H I {I.I.u4 .moooN.H A< wmmmpm nmh<4=z_m nz< z.<¢»m 4 wwmmhm ABC‘s—Em 3.0me Hm museum f: U>QH . . - T “'7“ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I l a I“. i I . \‘ ‘x N‘ . . ..I . _1 I40 4 I ...... ... :7 ....... _. : . . _ .nr. . . . .. .. ...vovlo.¢udo 941 1 1 ... . . I , . I I -. w—h—“- «___-“__“Qv -..—q..-~-.—. ..--... . . , I . . 1111']; h w L .. .1. I 4 - L 83 mooo~.H p< z~ mmmzhm awh<4=:_m nz< z_<¢»m upozmm EU \ 00. 53 co. m mm m¢=o_m 5:; So. 393.... 2.: 8c 84 with the I.S.G. at the remote location. Therefore, when these measured strains were replayed onto the smooth speci- men,aalarge amount of stress relaxation occured during the hold times. This caused the stress vs. strain plots to take on an almost rectangular appearance. The stress simulation data shows that as the distance from the notch increases, the amount of stress relaxation also increases. This is related to the fact that there is less creep strain to balance the relaxation of stress at the remote location. This information is valuable when trying to construct an overall picture of high temperature behavior in a notched plate. 5.6 High Temperature Neuber Prediction The Neuber prediction of local behavior was entirely dependent upon remote stress and strain data. These remote data had been determined by the stress simulation described in Section 5.5. Therefore, it is not surprising that when the remote stress and strain values are multiplied by 0&3)2 to construct the Neuber prediction curves, that these curves have decreasing slopes during the hold times. An example of this is shown in Figure 53 for Level 3. This figure shows the actual curves which were retraced during the smooth speci- men Neuber prediction. A cyclically stabilized hourglass specimen heated to 1,200°F was used to establish notch root behavior at four load levels. A comparison was made between the measured 85 strain/stress simulation and the Neuber prediction in Figures 54 and 55. The most noticeable trend at all four levels was the amount of stress relaxation predicted by the Neuber relation. For Load Levels 1 and 2, the stresses at the end of the 100 second hold times were low by 23% and 27% respectively. The stresses were predicted more accurately at the higher Load Levels. At load level 3 the stresses were 22% low and at Level 4 the stresses were 15% lower than the stress simulation. In terms of strain range, the error in predicting Level 1 strains was 20% low while the Level 4 strains were predicted within 10%. The behavior during the hold times was quite interest-~ ing. The stress relaxation caused the product of stress and strain to decrease. This meant that the Neuber prediction curve's downward slope was automatically satisfied. However, continued stress relaxation forced the operator to increase the level of strain in the specimen so that the Neuber rela- tion would still be satisfied. This accounted for the slanted corners of the Neuber hysterisis loops. £36 m 4m>m4 ozau zo_»u_nmzm mums“: mm mm=o_u 1.22. «ads ego: _ 04 pa Acco.VxA-a: oonv auxoo- n su\ou. on ya .<«A.uv “one Lucsuuuo 87 L l H _ N L h _ L It 1' .IUI II II 1‘! 1 1 I III IIII. .--lu It‘ll-(Ill. 1'! l1. 1 h , . a It .I . . I V IA 11 . _ . .. . . . . L . . . L _ L . u _ L _ . _ _ I. I 7 ~ . — _ ..~.. _ L . J. . .L .. -4. . I.I.0| ,‘IIILIIII 1' tIVIl . )7 ail. " ~— I 'I . I _ . ._- ~__...._....._--I ...—--- 1 L Wale... L . _ mm . .IL _ . . H . . . . . .L - n L\l/:t. g .;;;L: ;.:L wIIIIILII.- :IIITVL . I g 1. . H . .. . L 1.. . I. - . _Hw... H U. 14-1...711wws112 a 5g . ..L7...II--. , h .L_ . . ”N H u... T.. 1L .- 0‘ L .Hwa’7#.. w. -..m-- .IIL-WIIIII ....I H u _ .. L I- mm L.,/. . _L:I m v _m e 4 . - ..... .TII. W. m 11.1%. ./I/ ....m I 1 1% L; mm r mm ,. .. ILI. m m I 1 1 ‘1‘!’ "T"‘. oHd4——_~__..____...___.,. . . I . ;.;.I..I-;; 1 1 1 1 LL .~‘.. 1 I 10004 I -. 7- :77 . I".-. 1 1 L, I 1 f 1 1 . I I .- —._....._4,7_--.... ...- -... . . STRESS SIMULATION 1 NEUBER PREDICTION + .. .-..I H L _ f” 11-.-..- -. L; ..... IA . m _ , .. . III. .IIII I I L I 7....I--. FIGURE 54 NEUBER PREDICTION AND STRESS SIMULATION AT 1,200°F 88 . . ...- ..., . ..L‘-.-- ~--«..-. LOAD LEVEL 3 NEUBER PREDICTION 371---- -~_-..._.-- -. ' ff' 7' STRESS SIMULATION .. _ 1‘ . I FIGURE 55 NEUBER PREDICTION AND STRESS SIMULATION AT 1,200°F CHAPTER 6 CONCLUSIONS Neuber control of a smooth specimen predicted the notch root stress-strain behavior of a circular center notched plate that was made of Hastelloy X with excellent agreement to direct experimentally measured notch root strains and simulated stresses at room temperature. The agreement was good for initial behavior during cyclic hardening and for the stable condition at four different load levels. At 650°C and for the stable conditions, agreement with experimental data were acceptable with the maximum error at 20%. At this higher temperature, the direct experimental data showed primarily creep strain during hold times. The Neuber prediction showed both creep and stress relaxation. This difference in the general be- havior resulted in significantly larger errors at this elevated temperature than those for room temperature. 89 REFERENCES 10. REFERENCES Signorelli, R. A., Glasgow, T. K., Halford, G. R. and Levine, S. R., "Materials and Structures Technology," NASA Conference Publication #2092, May 1979, pp. 150- 162. Avery, L. R., Carayanis, G. S. and Michky, G. L., "Thermal Fatigue Tests of Restrained Combustor Cooling Tubes," Experimental Mechanics, Vol. 7, No. 6, June 1967, pp. 256-264. Walker, K. P., "Research and Development Program for Nonlinear Structural Modeling with Advanced Time- Temperature Dependent Constitutive Relationships," NASA Report No. CR—l65533, November 1981. Blatherwick, A. A. and Olson, B. K., "Stress Redistri- bution in Notched Specimens Under Cyclic Stress," ASD Technical Report 61-451, Aeronautical Systems Division, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Dayton, Ohio, 1961. Bofferding, C. H., "A Study of Cyclic Stress and Strain Concentration Factors at Notch Roots Throughout Fatigue Life," Masters' Thesis, Michigan State Univeristy, 1980. Guillot, M. W., “An Experimental Evaluation of Neuber's Cyclic Relation at Room and Elevated Temperatures," Ph.D. Thesis, Louisiana State University, May 1981. Leis, B. N., Gowda, C. V. B., and T0pper, T. H., "Some Studies of the Influence of Localized and Gross Plasti- city on the Monotonic and Cyclic Concentration Factors, Journal of Testing and Evaluation, Vol. 1, No. 4, July 1973, pp. 341-348. Sharpe, W. N., Jr., "The Interferometric Strain Gage," Experimental Mechanics, Vol. 8, No. 4, April 1968, pp. 164-170. Sharpe, W. N., Jr., "Interferometric Surface Strain Measurement," International Journal of Non-Destructive Testing, 3, 1971, pp. 51-76. Sharpe, W. N., Jr., "A Short Gage Length Optical Gage for Small Strain," Experimental Mechanics, Vol. 14, No. 9, 1974, pp. 373-377. 90 ll. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 91 Sharpe, W. N., Jr., "Development and Application of an Interferometric System for Measuring Crack Displace- ments," Final report on Grant NSG 1148, June 1976. Crews, J. H., Jr., and Hardrath, H. F., "A Study of Cyclic Plastic Stresses at a Notch Root," Experimen- tal Mechanics, Vol. 6, No. 6, June 1966, pp. 313-320. Stadnick, S. J., "Simulation of Overload Effects in Fatigue Based on Neuber's Analysis," T&AM Report No. 325, University of Illinois, Urbana, 1969. Leis, B. N., Gowda, C. V. B., and Tepper, T. H., "Cyclic Inelastic Deformation and the Fatigue Notch Factor," ASTM STP 519, American Society for Testing and Materials, 1973, pp. 133-150. Wetzel, R. M., "Smooth Specimen Simulation of Fatigue Behavior of Notches," T&AM Report No. 295, University of Illinois, Urbana, May 1967. Stadnick, S. J., and Morrow, Jo Dean, "Techniques for Smooth Specimen Simulation of the Fatigue Behavior of Notched Members," ASTM STP 515, American Society for Testing and Materials, 1972, pp. 229-252. Sharpe, W. N., Jr., "Preliminary Development of an Interferometric Strain Gage for Use on Nosetip Ma- terials Subjected to Thermal Shock," Final Report for Air Force Materials Laboratory TR 76-63, June 1976, pp. 14. Jaske, C. E., Rice, R. C., Buchheit, R. D., Roach, D. B., Porfilio, T. L., "Low Cycle Fatigue of Type 347 Stainless Steel and Hastelloy X in Hydrogen Gas and in Air at Elevated Temperatures," NASA Report No. CR-135022, May 1976. Cabot Corporation, "Hastelloy Alloy X," High Technology Materials Division, June 1976. Peterson, R. E., "Stress Concentration Factors, John Wiley and Sons, Inc., 1974, pp. 150-196. Boresi, A. P., Sidebottom, O. M., Seely, F. B., Smith, J. 0., "Advanced Mechanics of Materials," John Wiley and Sons, Inc., 1978, pp. 576-579. Slot, L., Stentz, R. H., Berling, J. T., "Controlled Strain Testing Procedures," Manual on Low Cycle Fatigue Testing, ASTM STP 465, American Society for Testing and Materials, 1969, pp. 100-128.