', .UIIII‘IIIhiI:fITI1II I ,. : III I III ' I- “III II - “If! “I"! ‘IIIIIII III? III III IIIIIIII : IIIIIIMy ,I. IN I IIl . III I I I reg I ‘- _.__:_:_:;::: ‘A. q_. “3’ W—-—«—_ -7— _ . _. W __ _—'::_: 4-;_ fi_ ~A~tw fi—w. ‘-_———— 1;, IIIIM if. 3?. ‘IIIW; ,6?“ 4 II :3 gal-uh 33%?“ 6 III? III." a? I“ III, II V I, “I“ g. 1}“ '31 54,431! Iin. I .2333]? I} ‘ . 1 ml h“ l: a II? :ImI I n I5 I If: ii; In “Pry“: I11? Iii?“ .1, I I v '9 u r. Ht. If: I I'I' :31; .- ; :‘ {RITE II I: IIIIIM" III IJIIIfI‘ ': 'I‘I‘IIIIILE: -,. I. It III “MIL xiii”; "1".‘5 £.‘.’".I..I "’ ‘z ‘ 3:”;ng ‘II‘ .1 -..a I“ ’WLI‘JII‘L“ .‘I-{Sii {If _f.g;;,: f‘g . N .é‘III’I'I'R‘I“ “LI'II‘II‘ .31.}; I7;- I | .1 EilfivIw-HIHIIJ an ‘II “II :‘EII (:II: I? XII... III II IIJJHIfi-“iq 1" III. ”II ”III”; i'I‘IiI'IH; “ll 11% ”“1 .III- 'LJI' 0'1. lIflf' I“L I ': i ,_ - ‘L'# III“. “I IIIII ' I”: III ' .1: w" "I I II‘IIIII‘IIIII‘I” I I I I ' It in“: I': 41". I 1‘3“};1". t. { I I: III: ‘ ‘3‘: 1581!“? “(:3)” M" q'h'I. "' {SM :7 ' raw” -".~J=- THESIS - --‘-«:3..__ .- .. 1.. In: W? La Lift; gig” ‘Kd‘g 9"? 61"«143 (”91" A? “*5???- r-"n fi/Qfifi‘ L UMV’Sfimgg-y J m This is to certify that the thesis entitled PURIFICATION AND CHARACTERIZATION OF AN a-KETOISOCAPROATE OXIDASE FROM RAT LIVER presented by Patrick John Sabourin has been accepted towards fulfillment of the requirements for Ph.D. degree in Biochemistry Q/A‘, Major professor // 0-7 639 MSU LIBRARIES ”— RETURNING MATERIALS: RTace in book drop to remove this checkout from your record. FINES will be charged if book is returned after the date stamped be10w. PURIFICATION AND CHARACTERIZATION OF AN o—KETOISOCAPROATE OXIDASE FROM RAT LIVER By Patrick John Sabourin A DISSERTATION Submitted to Michigan State University in partial fUifiiiment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Department of Biochemistry 1981 ABSTRACT PURIFICATION AND CHARACTERIZATION OF AN a-KETOISOCAPROATE OXIDASE FROM RAT LIVER By Patrick John Sabourin Isopycnic sucrose gradient separation of rat liver organelles re- vealed the presence of two distinct enzymes which decarboxylate a-keto- isocaproate; the mitochondrial branched-chain a-keto acid dehydrogenase and a cytosolic a-ketoisocaproate oxidase. The branched-chain a—keto acid dehydrogenase uses a-ketoisocaproate, a-keto-B-methylvalerate, and a-ketoisovalerate (the a-keto acids of leucine, isoleucine and valine) as substrates and requires CoASH and NAD+ as cofactors. This enzyme has been studied extensively and operates by a mechanism similar to that of pyruvate dehydrogenase. The cytosolic a-ketoisocaproate oxidase uses only a-ketoisocaproate and a-keto-Y-methiolbutyrate (the a-keto acids of leucine and methionine) as substrates and does not require CoASH or NAD+ for activity. The purpose of this study was to further character- ize the cytosolic o-ketoisocaproate oxidase activity. The cytosolic a-ketoisocaproate oxidase activity was partially char- acterized in 70,000 x g supernatant fractions of rat liver homogenates (cytosol preparation). Oxygen was required fbr enzymatic activity. Cy- tosol preparations consumed oxygen when either a-ketoisocaproate or a- ketOdY—methiolbutyrate were added. None of the other a-keto acids tested stimulated oxygen consumption. a-Ketoisovalerate, a-keto-B-methylvaler- ate, a—ketobutyrate and a-ketononanoate inhibit the a—ketoisocaproate oxidase activity. Phenylpyruvate is a very potent inhibitor. a-Ketoiso- caproate oxidase activity was only detected in liver and kidney. In order to further characterize the cytosolic a—ketoisocaproate oxidase (decarboxylase) activity, it was purified from rat liver. The purified enzyme required Fe2+ and a sulfhydryl reducing reagent fbr optimal activity. Other metal ions tested would not replace Fe2+. During purification this enzyme was quite unstable. Inclusion of 5% mon- othioglycerol in all buffers increased stability. Using a 180 fold puri- fied preparation of the a-ketoisocaproate oxidase, the assay conditions fbr this enzyme were optimized. Maleate, up to 0.2 M increased the activity. This was not due to an ionic strength effect. Optimal activ- ity was obtained at pH 6.0 in the presence of 1 mM FeSO4, 0.5 mM ascor- bate and 1 mM dithiothreitol. The Km of the a-ketoisocaproate oxidase for a-keto-meethiolbuty- rate is about 6 times higher than that for a-ketoisocaproate (1.9 mM vs. 0.3 mM). This enzyme converts a-ketoisocaproate to a-hydroxyisovaleric acid. Isovalerate is not a free intermediate of the reaction. 180 incorporation experiments indicate that this enzyme is a dioxygenase, that inserts one 0 atom of 02 into the carboxyl group and the other 0 atom of 02 into the B-hydroxyl group of B-hydroxyisovaleric acid. To Carol Lee 11 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank Dr. Loran Bieber for his guidance, encourage- ment and critical evaluation of my experimental data. He is responsible for increasing my ability to critically judge my work and that of others. I would also like to acknowledge the help and friendship of my coworkers who have made my stay here a pleasant and valuable experience. I am deeply grateful to Betty Baltzer, who worked overtime on mass spectral analysis and Sara Morrison-Rowe and Chris Vandenberg who helped me with countless tedious assays. I am grateful for the financial support of the National Institute of Health and the College of Osteopathic Medicine at Michigan State Univer- sity which made this research and my academic training possible. I extend my deepest gratitude to my wife Carol. Her support, en- couragement, understanding and patience have helped me through the dis- couraging days and kept the fun in science. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . LIST OF TABLES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ABBREVIATIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . LITERATURE REVIEW . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I. Metabolism of the Branched-Chain Amino Acids A. Metabolic Pathway . . . . . . . . . . . . 3. Regulation and Interorgan Distribution of Branched-Chain Amino Acid Metabolism . . II. Effect of Carnitine on Branched-Chain Amino kid Metab01 1 sm 0 C C O O . C C C O O O O O O 0 III. Specific Effects of Leucine on Metabolism . . A. Effect of Leucine on Protein Turnover . . B. Effect of Leucine on Insulin Secretion . C. Effect of Leucine on Glucose and Pyruvate MetabOI 1. 5'" I O O O O O O O O O O O 0 O 0 IV. Metabolic Diseases Associated with Branched- Chain Amino Acid Metabolism . . . . . . . . . V. Evidence for the Existence of an Extramito- chondrial Branched-Chain a-Keto Acid Decar- boxylaseActivity.............. MATERIALS 0 I O I O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 METHODS O O 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 iv Page viii xii bah 10 10 12 12 13 16 18 19 Page I. Sucrose Gradient Separation of Rat Liver organe] 1 es 0 O O O 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 O O O 19 II. Preparation of Radioactively Labeled arKeto kids 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 20 III. Assay of arKetoisocaproate Oxidase Activity . . . . . . . . 21 A. Assay of a—[1-14C] Keto Acid Decarboxy- lating Activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 mthOd A O O O O O O I O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 21 MethOd B O O O O O O O O O . O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 22 B. Measurement of Oxygen Consumption in Presence of apKeto Acids . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23 IV. Isolation of Rat Liver Cytosol Preparations . . . . . . . . 23 V. Purification of Rat Liver Cytosolic a-Keto- isocaproate Oxidase . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 A. Purification A: Partial Purification of Rat Liver Cytosolic a-Ketoisocaproate OXidase O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 O O O O O 24 B. Purification B: Final Purification of apKetoisocaproate Oxidase . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26 0. Purification C . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29 VI. Analysis of Reaction Products . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31 VII. Polyacrylamide Gel Electrophoresis Using Denaturing or Non-Denaturing Conditions . . . . . . . . . . 32 VIII. Determination of Molecular Height of the arKetoisocaproate Oxidase by Sephacryl S-ZOO Chmmtography I O O O O O O O O O O O O I O 0 O O O O O O 33 IX. Enzymatic Incorporation of 180 Into 8- Hydroxyisovaleric Acid . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34 A. Incubationswith1802................. 34 B. Incubations with H2130 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35 C. Isolation of B-Hydroxyisovaleric Acid . . . . . . . . . 35 RESULTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37 I. II. III. IV. V. Subcellular Distribution and Partial Char- acterization of an a-Ketoisocaproate Oxidase Of Rat Li ver 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O A. Subcellular Distribution of Branched- Chain arKeto Acid Decarboxylating Activities in Rat Liver . . . . . . . . . . B. Properties of Rat Liver Cytosolic a- Ketoisocaproate Decarboxylase Activity . . C. Effect of arKeto Acids on Cytosolic a- Ketoisocaproate Oxidase Activity . . . . . . 0. Tissue Distribution of a-Ketoisocaproate Oxidase in the Male Rat . . . . . . . . . . Purification and Stabilization of the a-Keto- isocaproate Oxidase Activity from Rat Liver . . A. Stabilization of and Cofactor Requirements of a—Ketoisocaproate Oxidase Activity . . . 8. Purification of asKetoisocaproate Oxidase ktiVity O O O O O I O O I O O O O O O O 0 Physical Properties of Rat Liver arKetoiso- caproate Oxidase . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Kinetic and Catalytic Properties of the Purified a-Ketoisocaproate Oxidase . . . . . . A. Stability of the Purified arKetoisocap- roate Oxidase . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8. Metal Requirement of the arKetoisocap— mate OX‘Idase O O O O O O O I O O O O O O O C. Activation of the a—Ketoisocaproate OXidase O O O O O O O O O 0 O I O O O O O O 0. Optimal Assay Conditions for the or Ketoisocaproate Oxidase . . . . . . . . . E. Substrate Specificity of the a-Keto- isocaproate Oxidase . . . . . . . . . . . . Studies on the Mechanism of the arKetoiso- caproate Oxidase . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . A. Product Identification . . . . . . . . . . vi 37 37 39 46 49 49 49 61 68 68 68- 74 78 85 96 99 99 Page 8. Evidence That Isovalerate Is Not An Interm1ate O O O I O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 105 C. Mechanism of Formation of B-Hydroxyiso- valeric Acid by the a—Ketoisocaproate 0x1dase O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 1.08 DISCUSSION 0 O O O 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 O O O O 113 LIST OF REFERENCES 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 125 vii LIST OF FIGURES Figure Page 1 Subcellular Distribution of Branched-Chain a-Keto Acid Decarboxylases in Rat Liver . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38 2 The Effect of Ammonium Sulfate on Cytosolic a- Ketoisocaproate Decarboxylase Activity . . . . . . . . . . 41 3 Effect of Time and Protein Concentration on Cyto- solic arKetoisocaproate Decarboxylase Activity . . . . . . 44 4 Effect of Substrate Concentration on Cytosolic a-Ketoisocaproate Decarboxylase Activity . . . . . . . . . 45 5 Stability of the a-Ketoisocaproate Oxidase in a 12-F01d Puri fied Preparation I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 57 6 Stability of the a-Ketoisocaproate Oxidase in an 80-Fold Purified Preparation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 58 7 Effect of Monothioglycerol on a—Ketoisocaproate 0x1dase I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 60 8 DEAE-Cellulose Chromatography of a-Ketoisocap- roate OXidase I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 64 9 Phenyl-Sepharose Chromatography of a—Ketoiso- caproate Oxidase . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 66 10 Sephacryl 5-200 Chromatography of a-Ketoiso- caproate Oxidase . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 67 11 SOS-Polyacrylamide Gel ElectrOphoresis of «- Ketoisocaproate Oxidase . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 69 12 Native Gel Electrophoresis of a-Ketoisocap- roate OXidase I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 70 13 Determination of the Subunit Molecular Height of aPKetoisocaproate Oxidase . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 71 14 Molecular Height of the asKetoisocaproate Oxidase Determined by Sephacryl 3-200 Chromatography . . . . . . . 72 viii Figure 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 Stability of the Purified a—KIC Oxidase . . . . . Effect of Dithiothreitol and Ascorbate on Acti- vation of the a-Ketoisocaproate Oxidase by FeSO4 or FEC‘B I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Effect of FeSO4 Concentration on a-Ketoisocapro- ate OXIdase ktiVity I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Effect of Ascorbate on a-Ketoisocaproate Oxidase Activity in the Presence of Optimal and Subopti- mal Concentrations of FeSO4 . . . . . . . . . . . Stability of the “Activated“ a-Ketoisocaproate Oxidase in the Presence or Absence of FeSO4, Ascorbate and Dithiothreitol . . . . . . . . . . . Effect of Time and Protein Concentration on the a-Ketoisocaproate Oxidase Activity . . . . . . . . pH Optimum of the asKetoisocaproate Oxidase . . . Effect of NaCl Concentration on the a-Ketoiso- caproate Oxidase Activity . . . . . . . . . . . . Effect of Maleate Concentration on the a-Keto- isocaproate Oxidase Activity . . . . . . . . . . . Effect of Preincubation Time on a-Ketoisocap- roate Oxidase Activity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Effect of Substrate Concentration on a—Ketoiso- caproate or arKetoAY-Methiolbutyrate Oxidase MtiVity I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Gas Chromatograph Profile of the Major Product of Q'KEEOIsocaproate OXIdaSE o o o o o o o o o o o 0 Mass Spectrum of the Major Product of a—Ketoiso- caproate Oxidase . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Dowex-I Chloride Chromatography of the Reaction Products of the Purified a-Ketoisocaproate Oxidase Evidence That Isovalerate Is Not An Intermediate of the a-Ketoisocaproate Oxidase Reaction . . . . Enzymatic Incorporation of 180 from 1302 or H2130 into a-Hydroxyisovaleric Acid . . . . . . . . . . Incorporation of 180 from 1302 or H2130 into B- Hydroxyisovaleric Acid . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Proposed Mechanism of the a-Ketoisocaproate Oxi- dase Reaction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ix 79 80 84 87 91 93 94 97 100 101 102 104 107 110 118 120 10 11 12 13 LIST OF TABLES Cofactor Requirements of Rat Liver Cytosolic ar Ketoisocaproate Decarboxylase Activity . . . . . . Effects of a—Keto Acids, Arsenite, and Oxygen on a-Ketoisocaproate Oxidase Activity in Rat Liver Cytosol Preparations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Oxygen Consumption by Rat Liver Cytosol Prepar- ations Using Various apKeto Acids as Substrates . Tissue Distribution of arKetoisocaproate Decar- boxylase (Oxidase) in the Male Rat . . . . . . . . Partial Purification of a-Ketoisocaproate Oxidase from Rat L1 ver I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Effects of Possible Cofactors on a-Ketoisocapro- ate Oxidase Activity in the Partially Purified Preparation (Sephadex G-150 Pool) . . . . . . . . Purification of a-Ketoisocaproate Oxidase from Rat Liver: Purification C . . . . . . . . . . . . Stability of a-Ketoisocaproate Oxidase in the Presence of Monothioglycerol, Dithiothreitol, or GlycerOI I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Purification of a-Ketoisocaproate Oxidase from Rat Li ver I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Effect of Various Metal Ions on a—Ketoisocaproate OXIdase ktiVity I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Activation of asKetoisocaproate Oxidase by FeSO4 . Stability of a-Ketoisocaproate Oxidase Assay Mi Xture I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Effect of Various Buffers on a-Ketoisocaproate Oxidase Activity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X 47 48 50 51 53 55 59 62 75 82 89 92 Table Page 14 Effect of ADP or EDTA on a-Ketoisocaproate OXIdase ktiVity I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 95 15 Decarboxylation of arKetoisocaproate and arKeto- Y-Methiolbutyrate by Purification Fractions . . . . . . . 98 16 Presence of 18O in Enzymatically Formed 3- Hydroxyisovaleric Acid and Its Fragments . . . . . . . . . 111 xi ADP BCAA BCKA Buffer A CoA CoASH DEAE DTNB DTT EDTA FAD Hepes B-HIVA arKIC a-KYMB MES MOPS NAD+ NADH NADP+ * NAOPH SOS TCA Tris ABBREVIATIONS adenosine 5'-diphosphate branched-chain amino acid(s) branched-chain keto acid(s) 20 mM Tris HCl pH 7.8, 1% Isopropanol coenzyme A reduced coenzyme A diethylaminoethyl 5,5'-dithiobis(2-nitrobenzoic acid) dithiothreitol (ethylenedinitrilo)-tetraacetic acid, disodium salt flavin adenine dinucleotide N-Z-hydroxyethylpiperazine-N'-2-ethanesulfOnic acid B-hydroxyisovaleric acid a-ketoisocaproate a-keto-v-methiolbutyrate 2(N-morpholino)ethane sulfbnic acid morpholinopropane sulfbnic acid nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (oxidized) nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (reduced) nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (oxidized) nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (reduced) sodium dodecyl sulfate tricarboxylic acid tris(hydroxymethyl)aminomethane (Trizma base) xii INTRODUCTION The branched-chain amino acids, leucine, isoleucine and valine are essential in the diets of all mammals. The initial step in the catabo- lism of these amino acids is a transamination to produce a-ketoisocapro- ate, a-keto-a-methylvalerate and a-ketoisovalerate, respectively. The a—keto acids are then decarboxylated by a branched-chain a-keto acid dehydrogenase and converted to the acyl-CoA. A single enzyme, the branched-chain a-keto acid dehydrogenase (EC 1.2.4.3 and 1.2.4.4), cata- lyzes the decarboxylation and conversion of all three branched-chain a-keto acids to their respective acyl-CoA's (1-4). However, there are also reports in the literature of dehydrogenases and/or decarboxylases which use only one or two of the three branched-chain a-keto acids as substrates (5-10). The occurrence of branched-chain acylcarnitines (11,12) and branched- chain carnitine acyltransferase activities (11,13-15) in mammalian tis- sues indicates that carnitine may be involved in metabolism of the carbon skeletons of branched-chain amino acids. Solberg gt 31. (16) have shown conversion of branched-chain GPKECO acids to branched-chain acylcarni- tines by mitochondria of various rat tissues. Isobutyrylcarnitine is metabolized by isolated beef and rat liver mitochondria (17). A role for carnitine in branched-chain amino acid metabolism would be particularly likely if some of the branched-chain acyl-CoA's were formed outside of the matrix of mitochondria. The existence of glyoxylate: 1 leucine aminotransferase (18), carnitine acetyltransferase (19) and car- nitine isobutyryl transferase (13) activities in peroxisomes indicates that the metabolism of the branched-chain acyl residues may occur in more than one cellular compartment. In order to investigate this possibility, the subcellular distribution of the branched-chain a-keto acid decarboxy- lating activities in rat liver was determined. The data presented herein demonstrates the presence of at least two branched-chain a-keto acid decarboxylating activities in rat liver: a mitochondrial activity which decarboxylates all three branched-chain a—keto acids, a-ketoisocaproate, a-keto-B-methylvalerate and a-ketoiso- valerate and a soluble enzyme which decarboxylates only a-ketoisocaproate and asketo-Yemethiolbutyrate. The mitochondrial a-keto acid decarboxylating activity is due to the mitochondrial branched-chain a-keto acid dehydrogenase. This enzyme requires both CoA and NAD+ as cofactors. Recently, this enzyme has been the subject of numerous investigations since it appears to be highly regulated and the rate limiting step of branched-chain amino acid metabo- lism in most tissues. The cytosolic arketoisocaproate decarboxylating activity is different from the mitochondrial branched-chain a-keto acid dehydrogenase. The cytosolic enzyme does not require CoA or NAO+. Although there are pre- vious indications of a soluble o-ketoisocaproate decarboxylase activity (1,5,7-9), a detailed characterization of this activity is lacking. The data presented herein shows that the cytosolic enzyme is an oxi- dase which converts a-ketoisocaproate to B-hydroxyisovalerate. The pur- ification of this enzyme and the determination of some of its physical and kinetic properties are also presented. Speculation concerning the 3 possible role(s) of this enzyme in branched-chain amino acid metabolism is covered in the discussion. LITERATURE REVIEH I. Metabolism of the Branched-Chain Amino Acids A. Metabolic Pathway The catabolism of leucine, isoleucine and valine occur via very similar pathways. The amino acid is first transaminated producing the a-keto acid. The apketo acid is then decarboxylat- ed and converted to the corresponding acyl-CoA by a mitochondrial branched-chain a—keto acid dehydrogenase. Further metabolism of these acyl-CoA groups occurs inside the mitochondria. Leucine is ketogenic since it is metabolized to acetyl-CoA and acetoacetate. Isoleucine is only slightly ketogenic due to acetyl-CoA forma- tion. Both isoleucine and valine are gluconeogenic since they can be metabolized to intermediates of the tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle. B-Hydroxy-B-methylglutaryl-CoA, formed during leucine catabolism, may also be used in sterol synthesis (20,21). Transamination of leucine, isoleucine and valine is catalyzed by a branched-chain amino acid transaminase. Ichihara gt 31. (22-28) have isolated three isozymes of this enzyme. Isozyme I uses all three branched-chain amino acids (BCAA) as substrates and has been fbund in several tissues of rat and hog. Isozyme 11 uses only leucine and methionine as substrates and has only been found in rodent liver. Isozyme III uses all three BCAA as 4 5 substrates and has only been found in brain, ovary and placenta (29). arKetoglutarate is the primary acceptor of amino groups from the BCAA. Pyruvate and oxaloacetate are not utilized by the BCAA transaminase purified from hog heart and brain or from rat liver (24,30,31). Hhen rat diaphragm, atria or epididymal fat pad slices are incubated with leucine, production of alanine and glu- tamate plus glutamine increases (32-34). However, the transamin- ase in rat skeletal muscle has a much greater affinity fer a—ketoglutarate (Km 8 0.10 mM) than fer pyruvate (Km = 3.4 mM) (35). Therefbre, production of alanine is probably due to transamination of glutamate with pyruvate. The branched-chain a-keto acids, a-ketoisocaproate (a-KIC), a-ketoisovalerate and arketo-s-methylvalerate can also serve as amino group acceptors for the BCAA (31). The branched-chain u-keto acids (BCKA) can be transported into the mitochondria where they are decarboxylated and converted to acyl-CoA's by the mitochondrial BCKA dehydrogenase. This enzyme has been purified from rat liver (3) and frah bovine liver and kidney (2,36). It uses all three BCKA as substrates, re- quires both CoA and NAD+ as cofactors, and appears to operate by a mechanism similar to that of pyruvate dehydrogenase. Further metabolism of the acyl CoA's produced by the BCKA dehydrogenase occurs in the mitochondria via a pathway very simi- lar to B-oxidation. Little is known about the enzymes involved in this pathway. Recently, a specific isovaleryl-CoA dehydrogen- ase has been identified and isolated from pig and rat liver B. 6 (37-39). This enzyme is different from the butyryl-CoA or gener- al acyl-CoA dehydrogenases involved in B-oxidation. This enzyme, therefore, may be specific fer metabolism of isovaleryl-CoA, a metabolite of leucine. Isobutyryl-CoA, a metabolite of valine, is not a substrate fer this isovaleryl-CoA dehydrogenase. Regulation and Interorgan Distribution of Branched-Chain Amino Acid Metabolism The metabolism of the BCAA has been studied in a variety of mammalian tissues both 1g 113g and lg 11339. Most amino acids are taken up and metabolized by the liver (40), however, the BCAA are a notable exception, showing very little uptake by or net transport from the liver (41). Leucine, isoleucine and valine, however, are rapidly taken up and oxidized by skeletal muscle (42,43). The initial transamination of BCAA occurs mainly in extrahe- patic tissues (26,44,45). The tissue distribution of this enzyme has been done in rat. Stomach and pancreas contain the highest transaminase activity (46) followed by kidney, heart, brain, dia- phragm, testes and skeletal muscle. Liver has very low trans- aminase activity (26,44,45). On the other hand, the highest spe- cific activity of the BCKA dehydrogenase in rat, monkey, guinea pig and man occurs in liver and kidney (45,47,48). Skeletal mus- cle has very little BCKA dehydrogenase activity. These data sug— gest that the BCAA may be transaminated by peripheral tissues and the resulting a-keto acids transported to the liver for fUrther metabolism. 7 Although the BCKA dehydrogenase is apparently low in muscle tissue, Goldberg gt al. (49) have suggested that this is the major site fbr leucine catabolism, due to the large total mass of muscle, and the low transaminase activity in liver. Indeed, skeletal muscle is capable of oxidizing leucine completely to 002 (50,51). However, when rat atria or skeletal muscle are incubated with leucine, approximately 20-40% of the a-KIC pro- duced is released into the media (35,45,50,52,53). The BCKA dehydrogenase, therefore, is probably the rate limiting step in atria and skeletal muscle. Livesey gt g1. determined arterio-venous differences of the branched-chain a-keto acids in tissues of both rat (54) and man (55) after protein ingestion or leucine infusion. In both cases there was a net release of the BCKA by muscle and a net uptake by liver. Noda and Ichihara (56) reported a significant depression (14-60%) of total leucine oxidation in rats when the liver or kidney vessels were ligated. These results are again consistent with the involvement of both muscle and liver in BCAA metabo- lism. Recent investigations have revealed that the BCKA dehydrogen- ase is highly regulated (57-67) most likely via a phosphoryla- tion/dephosphorylation mechanism (59,61,62,66). Under the prOper assay conditions, the BCKA dehydrogenase activity of heart or muscle can be increased as much as 10 fold over basal levels (60,67). Therefore, previous estimates of the BCKA dehydrogenase activity in various tissues may have been carried out at 8 suboptimal conditions and must be reinvestigated under both phys- iological and optimal conditions. 11. Effect of Carnitine on Branched-Chain Amino Acid Metabolism Carnitine stimulates the oxidation of BCAA in rat skeletal muscle (68) and heart (69) but not in liver (69,70). The lack of effect of carnitine on the oxidation of BCAA by liver appears to be due to the low level of BCAA transaminase in this tissue. Hhen a—KIC is used as a substrate, carnitine does stimulate oxidation by liver homogenates (70). Van Hinsbergh gt 31. (71) and May gt al. (72) have shown stim- ulation of BCKA oxidation by carnitine in rat liver, heart, skeletal muscle, and kidney. The effect of carnitine, therefbre, must be at or distal to the BCKA dehydrogenase step. Solberg and Bremer (73) have shown that when various rat or mouse tissues are incubated with the BCKA and L-[methyl-3H1carnitine, branched-chain acyl [3H-methyl] carnitines are formed. Branched- chain acylcarnitines as well as branched-chain carnitine acyltrans- ferase activities have also been identified in many tissues of beef and rat (II-15,17). Since the branched-chain acyl-CoA's formed by the BCKA dehydrogenase can cause product inhibition of this enzyme (74), carnitine may stimulate BCAA metabolism by removing these acyl- CoA groups. Two hypotheses were proposed to account fbr the stimulatory effect of carnitine. The first, proposed by Bieber and Choi (12) is that carnitine may be involved in shuttling of acyl-CoA's produced by the BCKA dehydrogenase across an intracellular permeability barrier fer further metabolism. The second hypothesis, proposed by Van 9 Hinsbergh et al. (69), is that carnitine removes inhibitory branched- chain acyl-CoA groups from the mitochondria and maintains free CoA levels. Both of these effects would favor activation of the BCKA dehydrogenase. The first hypothesis would be supported if any of the BCKA dehy- drogenase were located outside of the mitochondria or even located on the outside of the inner mitochondrial membrane. Indeed, several investigators have reported evidence of extramitochondrial BCKA decarboxylase or oxidase activities (1,5-8). In addition the data of Johnson and Connelly (5) suggests that the BCKA dehydrogenase is located on the outside of the inner mitochondrial membrane. Data presented herein, however, demonstrates that only one BCKA dehydrogenase could be detected in rat liver and that this was ex- clusively mitochondrial. Extramitochondrial a-keto acid decarboxy- lating activities detected by other investigators (1,5-8) may be due to an oxidase similar to the a-ketoisocaproate oxidase described in this paper. Furthermore, Bremer and Davis (75) have shown that the BCKA dehydrogenase must be located on the inside of the inner mito- chondrial membrane since addition of CoA and NAD+ are not required. fer optimal activity in intact mitochondria. Previous experiments by Johnson and Connelly (5) utilized a ferricyanide assay which is quite insensitive and subject to interfering reactions (76). In light of these results, the second hypothesis seems more attractive. Studies in rat heart (75), liver (72) and skeletal mus- cle (71) indicate that carnitine stimulates the BCKA dehydrogenase by removing inhibitory branched-chain acyl-CoA's. The addition of isovalerylcarnitine decreases the oxidation of BCKA apparently due to 10 build up of intramitochondrial isovaleryl-CoA (71-72). Thus carni- tine apparently stimulates BCAA metabolism by decreasing intramito- chondrial acyl-CoA's and increasing the CoA/acyl-CoA ratio as well as the availability of free CoASH. These affects would favor "activa- tion“ of the BCKA dehydrogenase, which is believed to be the rate limiting step in BCAA metabolism. III. Specific Effects of Leucine on Metabolism Leucine and/or its'metabolites affect several metabolic processes which are not affected by isoleucine or valine. These include pro- tein synthesis and degradation, insulin secretion, and glucose and pyruvate oxidation. The a-KIC oxidase described herein uses the a—keto analogue of leucine as a substrate, but does not use the a—keto analogues of isoleucine and valine. Therefore, this enzyme may be important in regulation of leucine levels separately from iso- leucine or valine. In this section, therefore, I will describe the recent research concerning the specific metabolic effects of leu- cine. A. Effect of Leucine on Protein Turnover Fulks, Li and Goldberg (77) fbund that all three BCAA togeth- er, leucine alone, or a combination of leucine and isoleucine stimulated protein synthesis and inhibited protein breakdown in rat diaphragm. Buse gt al. (78), however, saw no effect of valine or isoleucine alone on rat diaphragm. In heart, both leu- cine and its metabolites stimulate protein synthesis and inhibit protein degradation (79). In gastrocnemius muscle, however, only 11 leucine was effective; a-KIC, isovalerate and acetate had no effect. Isoleucine and valine together had no effect on protein turnover in either tissue (79). These results must be interpre- ted with caution since uptake of leucine metabolites may differ in heart vs. gastrocnemius muscle. The exact mechanism of leucine's effect on protein turnover is unknown. Goldberg and Tischler (80) fbund that cycloserine, an inhibitor of leucine transamination, prevents the inhibition of protein breakdown by leucine without affecting the stimulatory effect of leucine on protein synthesis. Therefore, leucine itself may regulate protein synthesis. Morgan gt al. (79) fbund levels of protein synthesis to be approximately proportional to intracellular leucine concentrations in heart and skeletal mus- cle. Their studies indicate that leucine facilitates peptide chain initiation as measured by a decrease in ribosomal sub- units. In order to exert its inhibitory effect on protein degrada- tion, leucine must be metabolized. As mentioned previously, inhibition of leucine transamination prevents leucine's inhibi- tory effect on protein degradation. a-KIC mimics the effects of leucine on protein degradation in rat diaphragm and heart (79,80). The catabolism of muscle protein is a serious problem in patients with sepsis or trauma. Administration of a mixture of BCAA has been found to be useful in preventing muscle wasting and improving nitrogen balance in some of these patients (81). B. 12 Effect of Leucine on Insulin Secretion Leucine and a-KIC stimulate insulin secretion by rat pancre- atic islets (82-84). Isoleucine, valine and their respective a-keto acids, however, have no effect (82,85). It appears that leucine must be converted to a-KIC in order to stimulate insulin secretion (82) but the mechanism of action is unknown. It should be kept in mind that in all of these studies, leucine or a-KIC levels are above normal physiological values. Approximately 5 mM a-KIC (82,84,86) or leucine (83) is required for significant stimulation of insulin secretion. Normal plasma levels of leu- cine vary between 0.1 to 0.5 mM and BCKA levels normally do not exceed 0.08 mM (87). Effect of Leucine on Glucose and Pyruvate Metabolism Leucine inhibits formation of 14002 from D-[U-14C] glucose and inhibits pyruvate oxidation in the fasted rat dia- phragm and heart at concentrations between 0.2 and 1.2 mM (50,88). At 0.5 mM, isoleucine and valine had no effect on pyru- vate oxidation in these tissues. At higher concentrations, the a-keto derivatives of both leucine and valine inhibit the oxida- tion of pyruvate and/or a—ketoglutarate in a variety of tissues (89-91). Aminooxyacetate, an inhibitor of the BCAA transaminase, abol- ishes leucine's ability to inhibit pyruvate oxidation. a-KIC, however, inhibits pyruvate oxidation in the presence or absence of aminooxyacetate (88). Thus, metabolism of leucine is required fer its effect on pyruvate oxidation. 13 Using a perfused rat heart system, Haymack gt al. (60) have shown that 0.5 mM a-KIC causes considerable inactivation of the pyruvate dehydrogenase while activating the BCKA dehydrogenase. The addition of 0.25 mM pyruvate to the perfusate caused appre- ciable inhibition of the BCKA dehydrogenase and activated the pyruvate dehydrogenase. Thus, these two dehydrogenases appear to be regulated in an independent and reciprocal manner. IV. Metabolic Diseases Associated with Branched-Chain Amino Acid Metabo- lism Several diseases associated with defects in branched-chain amino acid metabolism have been recognized. These are characterized by the accumulation of one or more of the BCAA and/or their metabolites in blood or urine. Maple syrup urine disease is a rare (but often misdiagnosed) disease which occurs in early infancy. This disease is characterized by a distinct maple syrup-like odor in the sweat and urine of the child and the accumulation of the BCAA and BCKA in urine and serum (92). This disease leads to mental retardation and usually death . within a year. It is unknown whether the BCAA or BCKA are responsi- ble fbr the clinical abnormalities. o-Ketoisocaproate and caketoiso- valerate inhibit pyruvate and/or a-ketoglutarate oxidation by mito- chondria isolated from rat brain, liver, kidney and heart (89-91). Leucine is known to stimulate insulin secretion and may be responsi- ble for the hypoglycemia seen in these patients. Snyderman (93) has noticed that in all of the maple syrup urine disease patients they studied, leucine was elevated to a much greater degree than the other 14 branched-chain amino acids. Of the three branched-chain amino acids, leucine and its metabolites appear to be mainly responsible for the observed neurological symptoms (94), hypoglycemia (95) and inhibition of gluconeogenesis (96) seen in untreated cases. Isovaleric acidemia has been reported in several children (97- 99). This disease is characterized by a “cheesy“ odor to the breath and body fluids (92) and recurrent episodes of vomiting, acidosis and coma occurring after excessive protein intake or infection. Fibro- blasts from a patient showed a deficiency in the isovaleryl-CoA dehy- drogenase (100,101) and the accumulation of isovaleric acid and its glycine conjugate in the blood and urine (102). Interestingly, leu- cine and a-ketoisocaproate do not accumulate (92). This may be due, at least partly, to a loss of regulation and concomitant increase in activity of the BCKA dehydrogenase (103). The isovaleryl-CoA dehy- drogenase activity has been shown to be due to a specific enzyme which can be separated from the butyryl-CoA and general acyl-CoA dehydrogenase (37). This enzyme does not use isobutyryl-CoA, a meta- bolite of valine, as a substrate. Therefore, the metabolic block associated with this disease impairs leucine metabolism without directly affecting isoleucine or valine metabolism. Other metabolites also have been fbund to accumulate in patients during isovaleric acidemic episodes. Tanaka 33 al. (104) detected grossly elevated levels of lactate, acetoacetate, B-hydroxybutyrate and B-hydroxyisovalerate in urine of these patients. Other metabolites of the branched-chain amino acids have also been found to accumulate in certain metabolic disorders. These dis- orders are named by the metabolite that accumulates, fer example, 15 B-methylcrotonylglycinuria, propionic acidemia and methylmalonic acidemia (105). In B-methylcrotonylglycinuria, the defect appears to be at the a-methylcrotonyl-CoA carboxylase, which can be due to either a defective enzyme (106) or a biotin deficiency (107). In one patient, with no a-methylcrotonyl-CoA carboxylase activity, large amounts of a—ketoglutarate and B-hydroxyisovalerate as well as B-methylcrotonylglycine were excreted in the urine (106), but no ketosis was present. In a biotin responsive patient, however, a-hydroxybutyric acid, B-hydroxyisovaleric acid, lactic acid, a-hydroxyisobutyric acid and s-hydroxypropionic acid were all elevat- ed along with B-methylcrotonylglycine (105). This is due to the bio- tin requirement of propionyl-CoA carboxylase and pyruvate carboxylase as well as that of B-methylcrotonyl-CoA carboxylase. Metabolic disorders of branched-chain amino acid metabolism may also be secondary to other abnormalities. Landaas (108,109) has shown increased levels of s-hydroxyisovaleric acid, a-hydroxyisobuty- ric acid and 2-methyl-3-hydroxybutyric acid in patients with keto- acidosis from a variety of causes. These B-hydroxy acids are fbrmed from leucine, valine and isoleucine, respectively. A positive cor- relation was found between urinary levels of B-hydroxybutyric acid and a-hydroxyisovaleric acid (108). Increased levels of all three branched-chain amino acids are also seen in ketoacidotic patients (108,110). The mechanism by which branched-chain amino acids and their B-hydroxy metabolites are elevated is unknown. V. 16 Evidence for the Existence of an Extramitochondrial Branched-Chain arKeto Acid Decarboxylase Activity. The existence of a single mitochondrial BCKA dehydrogenase which utilizes the a-keto acids of leucine, isoleucine and valine as sub- strates is now widely accepted. However, dehydrogenases or decar- boxylases, which use only one or two of the BCKA as substrates, have been reported (5-10). Hohlhueter and Harper (1) first reported decarboxylation of a-[1—14CJ KIC by a soluble preparation of rat liver. They recog- nized that this activity was not due to “leaked“ mitochondrial BCKA dehydrogenase, since deliberate attempts to release the enzyme from mitochondria were unsuccessful. Under their assay conditions, only 8% of the total a-[I-14C] ketoisocaproate decarboxylating activ- ity was soluble, the rest was mitochondrial. In bovine liver, Johnson and Connelly (5) identified a small but significant amount of a-[1-14c] K10 and a—[I-14C] keto-3- methylvalerate decarboxylating activity in the soluble fraction. a-Ketoisovalerate was not decarboxylated by this fraction. This activity did not require the addition of CoA. However, they did not eliminate the possibility of endogenous CoA in their preparation. Grant and Connelly (7) have shown that a—KIC, but not a-ketoiso- valerate or a-keto-p-methylvalerate, is decarboxylated by cytosolic preparations from liver and kidney of mouse, rat, rabbit, guinea pig and beef and from the liver only of chicken. This decarboxylase activity did not require added 00A or NAD+ and showed very little activity with pyruvate, a-ketoglutarate, a-ketoisovalerate, or a—keto-a-methylvalerate as substrates (8). 17 An arketoisocaproate decarboxylase activity has also been iso- lated from beef liver (9). This activity does not require CoA and NAO+ as substrates and does not use the other two BCKA as substrates. This activity is also insensitive to arsenite, an inhib- itor of the mitochondrial BCKA dehydrogenase. Properties of this enzyme are very similar to those of the a-ketoisocaproate oxidase described herein. The cytosolic arketoisocaproate decarboxylating activity appears to be widely distributed among mammals (7). Previous studies indi- cate that this activity is quite low in comparison to the mitochon- drial BCKA dehydrogenase (1,5). However, cytosolic decarboxylation of a-ketoisocaproate has been shown to increase under conditions which cause high circulating levels of the branched-chain amino acids, fer example, high protein meal (111) or diabetes (112). This enzyme activity therefore may be important in BCAA metabolism when serum or tissue levels of the BCAA are elevated. MATERIALS The materials used in this study are listed below with the source and catalog number. All other chemicals used were of analytical reagent grade or the finest commercially available. DEAE (diethylaminoethyl)-cellulose, Hhatman DE52, reeve angel, Clifton, NJ [1-14C] sodium isovalerate, ICN Pharmaceuticals Inc., Irvine, CA (Cat. No. 12128) L-[1-14cJ Leucine, ICN Pharmaceuticals Inc., Irvine, CA (Cat. No. 10088) or New England Nuclear, Boston, MA (Cat. No. NEG-169) L-[U-14C])Leucine, ICN Pharmaceuticals Inc., Irvine, CA (Cat. No. 10089 L-[4,5-3H] Leucine, ICN Pharmaceuticals Inc., Irvine, CA (Cat. No. 20036) or Schwarz/Mann, Orangeburg, NY (Cat. No. 0332-313344) L-[1-14C] Methionine, Amersham Corp., Arlington Heights, IL (Cat. No. CFA 433) Oxygen-1802, Merck and Company Inc., Rahway, NJ (Cat. No. MO-1454) 90 atom % 0-18, Lot No. 55-F Phenyl-sepharose CL-4B, Sigma, St. Louis, MO (Cat. No. P-7892) Sephacryl S-ZOO Superfine, Pharmacia, Piscataway, NJ (Cat. No. 17-0871- 01) Sephadex G-150, Pharmacia, Piscataway, NJ (Cat. No. 17-0070-01) L-[1-14c1 Valine, New England Nuclear, Boston, MA (Cat. No. NEC-17I) Hater-180 (normalized) Merck and Company Inc., Rahway, NJ (Cat. No. MO-1670) 97 atom % 180, Lot No. 2164-E 18 1. METHODS Sucrose Gradient Separation of Rat Liver Organelles Male Sprague-Dawley rats, 300 gm, were fasted 2 days and then sacrificed by decapitation. Subcellular organelles from liver were separated by isopycnic density centrifugation as previously described (113) except that a 1 to 10 (instead of 1 to 20) homogenate of rat liver was used and the buffer for both the grinding medium and the sucrose gradient was 1 mM sodium phosphate, pH 7.5. Organelles were separated on a 600 mL zonal gradient (Figure 1B) or a 60 mL tube gra- dient (Figure 1A). The zonal gradient was identical to the 60 mL tube gradient except that the volume of all the sucrose solutions and amount of rat liver homogenate applied to the gradient were increased 10 times. Fractions were collected and assayed. Aliquots for assay of o-KIC decarboxylase activity were stored at -80°C until assayed. a-Ketoisovalerate decarboxylase activity was" measured on aliquots that were stored overnight at 4°C. Catalase (114), fUmarase (115) or glutamate dehydrogenase (113), and NADPH- cytochrome c reductase (116), the marker enzymes for peroxisomes, mitochondria and microsomes, respectively, were assayed by the cited methods with the following modifications. To rupture the organelles, 0.1% Triton X-100 was added to catalase and fumarase assays. The assay of NADPH—cytochrome c reductase included 0.01 mM rotenone and 0.68 mM sodium azide to inhibit mitochondrial electron transport. 19 20 II. Preparation of Radioactively Labeled orKeto Acids 14C or 3H labeled o—keto acids were prepared from the cor- respondingly labeled L-amino acids and purity determined according to the method of Rudiger gt al. (117). Solutions of 1-14C-labeled ‘ arketo acids were made up to the desired concentration by addition of unlabeled o—keto acids and stored at -80°C. a-[4,5-3H] KIC was purified prior to use to remove contaminants which eluted in the water wash and with isovaleric acid from Dowex-l chloride columns. The contaminants amounted to approximately 20% of the total cpm. To purify a-[4,5-3H] KIC, peak fractions from the Dowex-H+ column (117) containing o-[4,5-3H] KIC were neutralized and applied to a 0.5 x 4.5 cm Dowex-I chloride (100-200 mesh) col— umn. The column was washed with water fbllowed by a 200 mL linear gradient of 0-0.2 N HCl and 5 mL fractions were collected. Fractions containing only a-[4,5-3H] KIC were pooled, pH adjusted to 5.0 and lyophilized. In order to remove the large amount of salt present, the residue was resuspended in 0.02 N HCl, saturated with NaCl, and extracted with l-octanol. Ether was not used for extraction because much of the QPKIC was decarboxylated, probably due to contaminating~ peroxides in the ether. The octanol layer was re-extracted with water and adjusted to pH 6. The aqueous layer containing the GP [4,5-3H] KIC, showed only one peak when rechromatographed on the Dowex-l chloride column. No contaminating substances were detected when QPEU-14C] KIC was chromatographed on Dowex-I chloride columns. This compound was therefore used without further purification. 21 III. Assay of drKetoisocaproate Oxidase Activity A. Assay of a-[1-14C] Keto Acid Decarboxylating Activities Assays for determination of arketo acid decarboxylating activities were carried out in 1.5 cm diameter culture tubes, which were tightly stoppered with a serum cap. A plastic cup (Kontes) hanging from the serum cap contained 0.2 mL Hyamine (methylbenzethonium hydroxide) to trap 14C02 released dur- ing the reaction. The reaction conditions were varied throughout this work in order to establish optimal conditions for the assay. Two sets of reaction conditions were widely used and are de- scribed below. Oecarboxylase assays using other conditions are described in the figure and table legends. Method A: Reaction mixture A contained in a final volume of 0.4 mL; 0.2 M Tris base, 0.2 M maleic acid, pH adjusted to 6.5 with NaOH, 1.5 M ammonium sulfate, 1.0 mM NaZCO3, 1.0 mM ar[1-14C] KIC (or other a-keto acid) (50-100 dpm/nmole), and 25 to 100 uL of rat liver cytosol preparation or partially purified arKIC oxi-. dase. This reaction mixture was used for initial studies of the QPKIC oxidase in crude rat liver preparations and in initial attempts at purification. All components of the reaction mixture except the enzyme and c-[1-14C] keto acid were equilibrated at 25°C. The enzyme was then added to all assays approximately 8-15 min before addition of the a-[1-14c1 keto acid. 22 All reactions were initiated by the addition of the o—[I- 14C] keto acid. In some cases the d—keto acid was injected through the serum cap with a syringe. However, usually the GPKECO acid was added directly to the reaction mix and then the tube was quickly stoppered with a serum cap. A cup hanging from this cap had previously been filled with 0.2 mL Hyamine. Incubations were for 60 min (unless noted otherwise) in a 25°C shaking water bath. To terminate the reactions, 0.2 mL of 20% trichloroacetic acid was added and an additional hour with shaking was allowed fbr collection of 14C02. The cup plus Hyamine was put into a scintillation vial and counted in 10 mL of scintillation fluid (5). Specific activity was determined by releasing all of the 14coz from the a-[1-14c1 keto acid using ceric sulfate (118). Nonenzymatic decarboxylation of the a-keto acids was determined by replacing the rat liver prepara- tion with buffer in the assay. The blank value determined in this way was the same as when boiled enzyme preparations were used and is subtracted from all values reported herein. Method 8: Reaction mixture B contained in a final volume of 0.4 mL; 0.2 M Tris base, 0.2 M maleic acid, pH adjusted to 6.5 with NaOH, 1.0 nM FeSO4, 0.5 nM ascorbic acid, 1.0 nM dithiothreitol, 1.0 nM o—[1-14C] KIC (or other a—keto acid) (approximately 100 dpm/nmole), and 5 to 100 uL of the sample to be assayed. A stock solution containing 16 mM FeSO4, 8 mM ascorbic acid, and 16 mM dithiothreitol (cofactor mix) was prepared fresh daily. Addition 23 of 25 uL of this cofactor mix per assay gave the desired final concentrations of FeSO4, ascorbic acid and dithiothreitol (1.0 mM, 0.5 mM, 1.0 mM). The reaction was preincubated for 1 hour at 25°C (unless noted otherwise) with all components excluding the a-[I-14C] keto acid. The a-[1-14C] keto acid was then added to initiate the reaction and the assay continued as in Method A. B. Measurement of Oxygen Consumption in Presence of QPKECO Acids The reaction mix contained in a final volume of 3.0 mL; 0.2 M Tris, 0.2 M maleate, pH 6.5, 1.5 M ammonium sulfate, 1.0 mM Na2C03 and 0.5 mL of rat liver cytosol preparation (see below). Oxygen consumption was measured with a Yellow Springs Instruments oxygen monitor. After establishing a basal rate of 02 consumption the o—keto acid was added to give a final con- centration of 1 MM and the change in the rate of 02 consumption was recorded. All reactions were carried out at 25°C. Oxygen solubility in the reaction mix was determined by the method of Robinson and Cooper (119). A value of 96 1 10 nmol OZ/mL was fbund. This value was used fer all polarographic measurements. IV. Isolation of Rat Liver Cytosol Preparations Male Sprague-Dawley rats, 150-200 g, were fasted for 24-48 h and then sacrificed. The livers were homogenized using a Potter-Elvehjem glass homogenizer in 3 vol of 0.25 M sucrose buffer (0.25 M sucrose in 2.5 nM Hepes [N-Z-hydroxyethyl pi perazine-N'-2-ethanesul fonic V. 24 acid], pH 7.4, 0.25 m EDTA). The homogenate was centrifuged 12 min at 500 x g and the pellet discarded. The 500 x g supernatant fluid was centrifuged 12 min at 20,200 x g. The 20,200 x g supernatant fluid was centrifuged 1.5 h at 70,000 x g. The supernatant fluid was decanted and the volume reduced by ultrafiltration. The concentrated fluid was dialyzed for 4 h against several changes of 33 mM potassium phosphate buffer, pH 7.4. This preparation is referred to as rat liver cytosol and was stored at -80°C. Protein was determined by the Lowry method (120) as previously modified (121). Purification of Rat Liver Cytosolic QPKECOISOCGPFOEtE Oxidase Several purifications of the rat liver a—ketoisocaproate oxidase were carried out. Those which are pertinent to this work are described below. Protein was determined in purification fractions using the method of Bradford (122). a—KIC oxidase activity was mon- itored by decarboxylation of a-[1-14C] KIC as previously described. All purification steps were carried out at 4°C unless noted otherwise. A. Purification A: Partial Purification of Rat Liver Cytosolic drKetoisocaproate Oxidase Sprague-Dawley rats were decapitated and the livers removed and homogenized with a Potter-Elvehjem glass homogenizer in 5-10 vol of 0.25 M sucrose. The homogenate was centrifuged 12 min at 500 x g and 12 min at 20,000 x g and the supernatant saved. This was stored at -80°C until used. The 20,000 x g supernatant frac- tion was thawed and centrifuged at 70,000 x g for 1.5 h. Lipids 25 were aSpirated from the top of the sample and the supernatant fluid was saved. This “70,000 x g supernatant" fraction was stored at -80°C overnight. After thawing, one-tenth volume of cold 2% protamine sulfate was slowly added while stirring at 4°C. After stirring fbr 15 min, the preparation was centrifuged for 18 min at 13,000 x g. The “0.2% protamine sulfate supernatant" was brought to 35% saturation with the slow addition of powdered amnonium sulfate, stirred for 15 min at 4°C, and centrifuged 18 min at 13,000 x g. The “35% (NH4)ZSO4 supernatant" was stored at ~80°C. The d-KIC oxidase activity was stable at -80°C fbr several weeks, but 80% of the activity was lost in 4 days at 4°C. One percent isopropanol completely stabilized the activity in the “35% (NH4)2SO4 supernatant fraction“ fer at least 1 week at 4°C. Up to 1% isopropanol in the assay reaction mix did not affect the GPKIC oxidase activity. The frozen “35% (NH4)ZSO4 supernatant“ fraction was thawed and dialyzed against 10 liters of 20 nM Tris-HCl, pH 7.8, 1% isopropanol fer 48 h, with two changes of buffer. The dialy- sate was centrifuged 30 min at 13,000 x g to remove precipitated material. The supernatant, "pre-DEAE dialysate“ was stored for 4 days at -80°C and then applied to a 4 x 40-cm DEAE-cellulose (Hhatman DESZ) column, equilibrated with 20 mH Tris-HCl, pH 7.8, 1% isopropanol (Buffer A). This was washed with 2 liters of the equilibration buffer fellowed by a 2-liter linear gradient of 0 to 0.5 M NaCl in Buffer A. The OPKIC oxidase activity eluted at approximately 0.8 M NaCl and peak fractions were pooled ("DEAE- 26 cellulose pool"). This was stored 4 days at -80°C and then con- centrated to 9.8 mL with an Amicon PM 30 ultrafiltration filter ("concentrated DEAE pool"). The concentrated DEAE pool was cen- trifuged at 13,000 x g for 10 min to remove precipitated material and applied to a 4.8 x 82-cm Sephadex 6150 (40-120 um) column which was equilibrated with Buffer A containing 0.2 M NaCl. The column was eluted with the same buffer at a flow rate of approx- imately 40 mL per hour and 9.4-mL fractions were collected. The GPKIC oxidase activity was retained by the column and eluted after catalase activity. The peak fractions were pooled and stored at -80°C. After thawing, the sample was concentrated to 13.6 mL with an Amicon PM 30 filter and again stored at -80°C ("Sephadex G-150 pool"). Purification 8: Final Purification of o-Ketoisocaproate Oxidase The 10,000 x g supernatant fractions (in 0.25 M sucrose, 1% isoprOpanol) from a number of rat liver preparations were stored at -80°C. These are stable for at least two years. Powdered (NH4)ZSO4 was slowly added to 7.2 L of the 10,000 x g supernatant fraction while stirring until 45% of sat- uration was achieved. After stirring for an additional 30 min, the preparation was centrifuged 30 min at 10,000 x g. The “45% (NH4)2504 supernatant“ was brought to 75% saturation with the slow addition of powdered (NH4)ZSO4, stirred an addi- tional 30 min, and centrifuged 30 min at 10,000 x g. The pellet (45-75% (NH4)ZSO4 fraction) was resuspended in Buffer A. This fraction was then dialyzed 60 hrs against 10 L of Buffer A, 27 with 5 changes of buffer and centrifuged 15 min at 8,000 x g to remove precipitated material (Pre-DEAE dialysate). The "Pre-DEAE dialysate" was applied to a 4.8 x 83 cm DEAE cellulose (Hhatman 0E52) column, equilibrated with Buffer A. This was eluted with 2.5 L of Buffer A fellowed by a 9 L linear gradient of 0-0.2 M NaCl in Buffer A. The aPKIC oxidase activity eluted at approximately 0.06 M NaCl and fractions containing activity were pooled (“DEAE cellulose pool“), concentrated to 250 mL using an Amicon PM 10 ultrafiltration membrane (“concentrated DEAE pool“), and stored at -80°C. In previous purifications (i.e.: Purification A) large losses of a-KIC oxidase activity occurred when using DEAE, phenyl sepharose and sephacryl columns during later stages of the puri- fication. In passage over Sephacryl S-ZOO only 10% of the applied activity was recovered. Protein containing fractions from the NaCl gradient elution of the initial DEAE column, which eluted befbre and after the peak of o—KIC oxidase activity, were pooled (“DEAE side fractions“). Hhen columns were pretreated with the “DEAE side fractions“, 90% of the applied arKIC oxidase activity was recovered. Therefore, all columns (except the first DEAE column) were pre-treated with the “DEAE side fractions“ and then washed extensively with the elution buffer until no more protein was detected in the elluent. Stability studies (see Results) also demonstrated that 5% monothioglycerol stabilized the orKIC oxidase activity. Subse- quently, 5% monothioglycerol was included in all buffers. 28 A portion of the "concentrated DEAE pool“ (116 mL) was adjusted to 5% monothioglycerol and 2.5 M NaCl by slowly adding these compounds while stirring (Pre-phenyl sepharose). This was applied to a 4.0 x 40 cm phenyl sepharose CL-4B column (Pharma- cia) which had been pretreated with 1.5 L Buffer A, 1.0 L of Buf- fer A containing 5% monothioglycerol, 2.5 M NaCl, 1.8 L of ”DEAE side fractions“ containing 2.5 M NaCl, 2 L Buffer A, and equili- brated with 1.5 L Buffer A containing 5% monothioglycerol, 2.5 M NaCl. The a—KIC oxidase activity was eluted with 1.5 L Buffer A containing 5% monothioglycerol, 2.5 M NaCl, followed by a 2 L linear gradient of 2.5-0 M NaCl in Buffer A containing 5% mono- thioglycerol. Fractions containing a-KIC oxidase activity were pooled and concentrated to 20 mL (Phenyl pool concentrate). The “phenyl pool concentrate“ was then applied to a 4.8 x 82 cm Sephacryl S-200 column which had been pretreated with "DEAE side fractions“ and equilibrated with Buffer A containing 5% mon- othioglycerol, 0.1 M NaCl. The column was eluted with the equil- ibration buffer at a flow rate of 13.6 ml/hr. Fractions contain- ing orKIC oxidase activity were pooled (Sephacryl S-200 pool) and stored at -80°C. Since monothioglycerol at concentrations greater than 0.6% inhibits the GPKIC oxidase activity (see Results), only small aliquots (IO-20 mL) of the Sephacryl S-200 pool could be assayed accurately. In some experiments requiring larger amounts of this enzyme, the monothioglycerol was removed from the Sephacryl S-200 pool. This was accomplished by passing 0.5 mL of the Sephacryl S-200 pool over a 0.75 x 14 cm Bio Gel P-6 (50-100 mesh) column C. 29 which was pretreated with "DEAE side fractions“ and equilibrated with Buffer A containing 0.1 M NaCl. Protein was monitored by adding 50 uL of Coomassie Blue Reagent (122) to 10 uL of each fraction and visually checking for blue color. To monitor mono- thioglycerol, 1 mL of 0.3 mM DTNB (5,5'-dithiobis-Z-nitrobenzoic acid) in .25 M glycylglycine pH 8.2, was added to the same assay tubes and yellow color checked visually. Fractions containing protein, but no monothioglycerol, were pooled and stored at -80°C (P-6-Pool). The purified d-KIC oxidase appears to be stable for at least 1 week in the absence of monothioglycerol if kept at ’800Co Purification C The GPKIC oxidase activity is fairly stable (20% loss in 10 days) in crude preparations, however this enzyme becomes very unstable as it is purified. Several purifications were done as part of a series of stability studies. One of these, which is pertinent to the experiments in this thesis is described here. This purification was attempted before Purification B and is essentially the same except fer the fbllowing changes. A portion (200 mL) of the “concentrated DEAE pool“ was thawed and centrifuged to remove precipitated material. To this por- tion, 50 mL of 95% ethanol at -20 to -30°C was slowly added while stirring on an ice bath. The temperature of the solution was maintained below -5°C. After complete addition of ethanol, the solution was stirred an additional 20 min, centrifuged at 10,000 x g and the pellet discarded. To this "25% ethanol supernatant", 30 150 mL of 95% ethanol (-20 to -40°C) was added slowly. The solu- tion was allowed to stir an additional 20 min after complete addition of ethanol and centrifuged 20 min at 10,000 x g. The pellet was resuspended in Buffer A containing 2.5 M NaCl by stir- ring overnight at 4°C. A large portion of the pellet did not re- dissolve. This fraction was then centrifuged 20 min at 10,000 x g and the supernatant (25-IOO% ethanol fraction) stored at -80°C. The yields of o-KIC oxidase activity from the ethanol precipitation step were variable; therefbre this step was omitted in the final purification (Purification B). The “ZS-100% ethanol fraction” was thawed and applied to a phenyl sepharose column and the purification continued as in Purification B. Buffers used to elute phenyl sepharose and Sephacryl S-200 columns did not contain 5% monothioglycerol. These columns were pretreated with the “DEAE side fractions". The ”Sephacryl S-200 pool“ was dialyzed 35 hr against 400 mL of Buffer A containing 1% monothioglycerol, with 3 changes of buffer. The dialysate was aplied to a 0.8 x 12 cm DEAE (Hhatman DE-SZ) column which had been pre-equilibrated with Buffer A containing 1% thioglycerol. Note that this column was not pretreated with “DEAE side fractions“. The column was washed with 60 mL of Buffer A containing 1% monothioglycerol and eluted with a 180 mL linear gradient 0-0.1 M NaCl in the same buffer. Fractions containing o—KIC oxidase activity were stored separately at -80°C (“2nd DEAE column"). 31 VI. Analysis of Reaction Products The reaction mix used for analysis of a—KIC oxidase reaction pro- ducts contained 0.2 M Tris, 0.2 M maleate, pH adjusted to 6.5 with NaOH, 1 nM dithiothreitol, 0.2 m‘i FeSO4, 0.4 nM ascorbic acid, 1 nM Na2C03, 1 m a-kIc, 0.3 uCi a-[4,5-3H] KIC, 0.1 uCi a-[1- 14C] KIC, and 0.2 mL of the “Sephadex G—150 pool" (Table 5) in a final volume of 0.8 mL. The reaction was followed by measuring the loss of a-[1-14C] KIC and was terminated at 4.5 h with 0.4 mL of 20% trichloroacetic acid. The protein was removed by centrifugation and the supernatant fluid was diluted with 20 mL of H20 and neu- tralized with NaOH. This was applied to a 0.7 x 37-cm Dowex-I x 8 chloride (200-400 mesh) column and washed with 70 mL H20. The col- umn was then eluted with a 300 mL linear gradient of 0 to 0.01 N HCl, 4 mL fractions were collected, and dpm of 3H and 14C were determined by double-label counting techniques. The fractions cor- responding to the largest 3H peak (peak I, Fig. 29) were pooled, the pH adjusted to 7 and lyophilized. The residue was resuspended in 2 mL of 2 N HCl, saturated with NaCl, and extracted 10 times with 1 mL diethyl ether; 90% of the 3H was extracted into the ether layer. The ether was then evaporated to approximately 50 uL under N2. The sample was analyzed on a Hewlett-Packard 5830 A gas chromatograph equipped with a stream splitter which divides the sample eluted from the gas chromatograph column between the flame detector and an exter- nal outlet tube. Samples were collected every minute from the outlet tube by condensation in a cold Pasteur pipet. The sample was rinsed from the pipet with 10 mL of scintillation fluid (5) into a scintil- lation vial and counted. A 6-ft x Z-mn i.d. glass col um packed with 32 15% SP 1220, 1% H3PO4 on 100/120 Chromosorb HAH, was used with a variable temperature program. The temperature was kept at 110°C for 5 min followed by a 3°C per minute increase up to 140°C. Injection temperaure was 180°C and N2 was the carrier gas. The peak contain- ing radioactivity was identified by using the same gas chromatograph system (except the carrier gas was He) in line with a Hewlett-Packard mass spectrometer. These analyses were performed by the mass spec- trometry facilities at Michigan State University, under the supervis- ion of C.C. Sweeley and J. Hatson. VII. Polyacrylamide Gel Electrophoresis Using Denaturing or Non-Denatur- ing Conditions SOS (sodium dodecyl sulfate) polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis was carried out on slab gels according to the procedure of Laemmli (123). Gels contained 10% acrylamide. Staining with Coomassie blue dye was carried out according to the procedure of Bonner and Laskey (124). Tube gels containing 7.5% acrylamide were prepared for native gel electrophoresis as described (123) except SDS was omitted. Gels were pre-run overnight at a constant current of 2 mA per gel. The cathode chamber contained .375 M Tris, 0.08% L-cysteine pH 9.0 and the anode chamber 2.5 mM Tris/glycine pH 8.3, 0.008% L-cysteine during this pre-run. After this pre-run the buffers were replaced with 25 mM Tris/glycine pH 8.3, 0.08% L-cysteine (cathode chamber) and 2.5 mM Tris-glycine pH 8.3, 0.008% L-cysteine (anode chamber). The sample was applied in a solution containing 10% glycerol, 0.003% bromophenol blue. Electrophoresis was carried out at a constant current of 1 mA 33 per gel for 1 hr, 2 mA per gel for 1 hr, and 3 mA per gel for the final 3 hrs. The gels were stained with Coomassie blue dye as described (124). arKetoisocaproate oxidase activity was monitored in some of the gels which were not stained. These gels were sliced into 2 mm sections, each section put into a separate test tube, and 50 uL of 20 "M Tris HCl pH 7.8, 1% isopropanol, 0.1 M NaCl, 5% monothiogly- cerol added. These were shaken for 2 days at 4°C and then assayed for a-KIC oxidase activity (see Method B). VIII. Determination of Molecular Height of the a-Ketoisocaproate Oxidase by Sephacryl S-ZOO Chromatography A 1.6 x 63 cm Sephacryl S-ZOO column was equilibrated with 20 mM Tris HCl pH 7.8, 1% isopropanol, 0.1 M NaCl. The column was then treated with 40 mL of the "DEAE side fractions" (see Section VB, Methods) and washed extensively with equilibration buffer. To cali- brate the column, bovine serum albumin, ovalbumin, and cytochrome c were applied separately to the column, eluted with the equilibration buffer and their elution volumes determined by measuring 00280 or 00410 (cytochrome c). The flow rate of the column was 1.7 ml/hr. In a separate experiment, 0.5 ml of the purified aPKIC oxi- dase (Sephacryl S-200 pool, Purification B) was applied to the column and eluted with the equilibration buffer containing 5% monothiogly- cerol. d-KIC oxidase activity was measured in fractions by Method B. The data was plotted and molecular weight determined by the method of Andrews (127). 34 IX. Enzymatic Incorporation of 180 Into B-Hydroxyisovaleric Acid A. Incubations with 1302 In 1802 incorporation experiments, the reaction mixture contained in a final volume of 0.30 mL; 0.2 M Tris base, 0.2 M maleic acid, pH adjusted to 6.5 with NaOH, 1 mM FeSO4, 0.5 mM ascorbic acid, 1 mM dithiothreitol, 2 mM a-[u-14c1 KIC (.025 uCi) and 0.1 mL of purified a-KIC oxidase (P-6-Pool, see purifi- cation B). All components except the a—[U-14C] KIC were added to a culture tube and frozen in a acetone, dry ice bath. Hhile froz- en, the a-[u-14c1 KIC was added and this was also frozen. The culture tube was then capped with a serum cap and the air removed by evacuation. The tube was flushed with N2, thawed, refrozen, and evacuated again. This process was repeated 4 times to insure all 02 was removed. The culture tube was then filled with 90 atom % 1302 (approximately 15 mL) via a syringe. The contents of the culture tube were then thawed and incubated 3 h at 25°C. At the end of the reaction, a-hydroxyisovaleric acid was isolated and analyzed as described below. The ratio of N2 to 02 was determined in 1 mL of the gas phase of the reaction vessel at the start and end of the reaction to insure that air was not leaking into the reaction vessel. Oxygen and nitrogen were analyzed on a Varian 3700 gas chromato- graph using a 2 mm x 2 m stainless steel column packed with Molecular Sieve 5A. The injection temperature was 40°C and col- umh temperature was 40°C isothermal. The flow rate of helium, the carrier gas, was 30 cm3/min. Detection was achieved with a 35 thermal conductivity detector at 100°C with a filament tempera- ture of 190°C. The instrument output was calibrated with a standard mixture of 1% 02:99% N2. 1802 dilution by 1502 due to leakage was calculated to be less than 3%. Incubations with H2180 The reaction mixture fer H2180 experiments was the same as for 1802 experiments except the reaction contained 93% H2130. In order to reduce H2150, 0.187 mL of 0.32 M Tris, 0.32 M maleic acid pH adjusted to 6.5 with NaOH, 18.7 uL of a solution containing 16 nM FeSO4, 8 nM ascorbic acid, and 16 mM dithiothreitol, and 0.2 mL of purified a-KIC oxidase (P-6- Pool) were combined, frozen and lyophilized. To the lyophilized powder, 300 an. of 97% H2180 and 11 m. of 80 m4 a-[u- 14C] KIC were added and all components mixed well. The tube was then capped with a serum cap, gassed with oxygen for two min and incubated 3 h at 25°C. a-hydroxyisovaleric acid was then isolated and analyzed as described below. Isolation of p-Hydroxyisovaleric Acid Isotopic oxygen incorporation experiments were terminated by passing the reaction mixture over a 0.5 x 5.0 cm Dowex-I chloride (200-400 mesh) column. The column was washed with 5 mL H20 and a-hydroxyisovaleric acid eluted with six 1 mL portions of 0.02 N HCl. The fraction containing B-[U-14C] hydroxyisovaleric acid was saturated with NaCl, and extracted three times with an equal volume of diethyl ether. The ether extractions were pooled 36 and concentrated to approximately 50-100 uL under N2. s-Hy- droxyisovaleric acid was analyzed by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry as described in Section VI of Methods except the gas chromatograph column temperature was 150°C, isothermal. B-Hy- droxyisovaleric acid had a retention time of 7.7 min under these conditions. RESULTS I. Subcellular Distribution and Partial Characterization of an d-Keto- isocaproate Oxidase of Rat Liver A. Subcellular Distribution of Branched-Chain d-Keto Acid Decarboxy- lating Activities in Rat Liver Peroxisomes, mitochondria and microsomes from male rat liver were separated on a sucrose gradient as shown in Figure 1. The subcellular distribution of d-[1-14C] ketoisocaproate (a—KIC) and a-[1-14C] ketoisovalerate decarboxylase activities in rat liver using assay conditions optimized for the mitochondrial branched-chain a-keto acid dehydrogenase are shown in Figure 1A. All of the d-[1-14C] ketoisovalerate decarboxylating activ- ities coincided with the mitochondrial marker, fumarase. None was associated with peroxisomes (catalase marker) or microsomes (NADPH-cytochrome c reductase marker). However, when a- [1-14C] KIC was used as a substrate, two peaks of decarboxy- lating activity were feund; one with mitochondria and the other with the cytosol fractions. Other studies showed that the mitochondrial activity requires CoA and NAD+ (data not shown) and uses all three branched-chain QPKEtO acids as substrates. This activity is due to the mito- chondrial branched-chain o-keto acid dehydrogenase (E.C. 1.2.4.3 and 1.2.4.4). 37 38 Figure 1. 9.. comets/umn x no” AME/m1! 2 Subcellular Distribution of Branched-Chain a-Keto Acid Decarboxylases in Rat Liver. Marker enzymes for peroxisomes (catalase), mitochondria (fumarase or glutamate dehydrogen- ase), and microsomes (NADPH cytochrome c reductase) are shown in the upper figures of A and B. In Figure A, decarboxylase activity was measured using conditions Optimized for the mitochondrial branched-chain o-keto acid dehydrogenase (lower figure). Each assay con- tained in a final volume of 0. 4 mL; 33 mM sodium0 ph05phate, pH 7.2, 1 mM MgCl2, 0. 25 mM CaClz, 1 mM N3 mM CoASH, 1 mM NAD , either 0. 4 TM a-[1-10103ketoiso- valerate (o-KIV) or 0.6 mM d-[1-4C] ketoisocaproate (d-KIC) (100,000 cpm) and 0.1 mL of the fraction to be assayed. In Figure B, decarboxylation of d-[1-14C] ketoiso- caproate was measured using assay conditions Optimized for the cytosolic d-ketoisocaproate oxidase activity (see Meth- ods, Method B). The assays also contained 5 mM sodiun arsenite. Abbreviations are Glu OH = glutamate dehydrogenase and NADPH Cyt c Red = NADPH cytochrome c reductase. B. 39 The cytosolic o-KIC decarboxylase activity is clearly differ- ent from the mitochondrial activity, as will be shown. After Optimizing assay conditions fOr this enzyme, the subcellular dis- tribution was again determined (Figure 18). Sodium arsenite (5 mM), an inhibitor of the mitochondrial branched-chain d-keto acid dehydrogenase was included in each assay. Again the d-KIC decar- boxylase activity was detected only in the soluble fraction. Properties Of Rat Liver Cytosolic o-Ketoisocaproate Decarboxylase Activity Cofactor requirements and other properties of the cytosolic a-KIC decarboxylase activity were investigated after dialysis. Table I shows that added MgZ+, Ca2+, Na2C03, phos- phate, CoA, NAD+, NADP+, FAD, thiamine pyrophosphate, and lipoic acid did not appreciably affect the activity. Although phosphate was present in all Of the assays fOr Table 1, other experiments (data not shown) using rat liver cytosol prepared in Tris-maleate buffer, showed that phosphate is not required fOr d-KIC decarboxylase activity. The assay fOr the a-KIC decarboxylase activity was optimized for concentration and pH of the buffer. Optimal activity was Obtained in 0.2 M Tris, 0.2 M maleate buffer at pH 6.5. Activity at pH 7.2 was approximately 80% of that at pH 6.5. Connelly gt al. (6) reported that bovine liver o-ketoisoca- proic:a-keto-B-methylvaleric acid dehydrogenase was activated by ammonium sulfate. Hhen rat liver cytosol was assayed in 0.2 M Tris, 0.2 M maleate, pH 6.5, 1.5 M ammonium sulfate stimulated 40 TABLE 1 COFACTOR REQUIREMENTS OF RAT LIVER CYTOSOLIC o-KETOISOCAPROATE DECARBOXYLASE ACTIVITYa a-KIC decarboxylase Factor omitted or added activity (% of control) None (control) (100) - MgClz 102 - CaClz 95 - Na2C03 111 - NAD+ 88 - Coenzyme A 116 - Potassium phOSphate, + 33 M Tris 120 + 0.5 nM Thiamine perphosphate 110 - NAD+ + 1 mM NADP+ 100 - NAD+ + 1 mM FAD 61 + 0.5 mM DL-d-lipoic acid 86 0.5 mM Thiamine pyrophosphate, + 0.5 nM DL-a—lipoic acid 101 aThe assay conditions were the same as in Fig. 1A except fOr the additions and deletions shown. Each assay contained 0.1 mL rat liver cytosol preparation. Control activity was 0.55 nmol/min/mg protein. Figure 2. 41 8 nmole 14002/ min/ mg protein 0.47 1 L (J 11) 213 Ammonium Sulfate (M) The Effect of Ammonium Sulfate on Cytosolic o-Ketoisocapro- ate Decarboxylase Activity. o-KIC decarboxylase activity was assayed as in Methods (Method A) except that the ammon- ium sulfate concentration was varied and the incubation time was 30 min. 42 the a-KIC decarboxylase activity (Figure 2). This stimulation was seen consistently, but the degree of stimulation was variable in different rat liver cytosol preparations. Figure 3 shows that with these assay conditions, the reaction rate was linear fOr at least 90 min when 1.5 M ammonium sulfate was present. In the absence Of amnonium sulfate, decarboxylase activity was always lower and linear fOr about 60 min. o-KIC decarboxylase activity was linear with protein concentration up to 2.8 mg of rat liver cytosolic protein per assay (the largest amount tested). The apparent Km for the rat liver cytosolic d-KIC decar- boxylase activity for o-KIC using these improved assay conditions is 0.03 mM (Figure 4A). Hith the assay buffer used fOr the sucrose gradient in Figure 1A, which was not at the Optimal pH for the cytosolic a-KIC decarboxylase activity and did not include amnonium sulfate, an apparent Km Of 0.2 nM was deter- mined (Figure 48). During the course Of these experiments, it was noted that there is a slow increase in o-KIC decarboxylase activity with time at 4°C. This is shown in Figure 4B where the two lines rep- resent identical assays done on the same rat liver cytosol prepa- ration but assayed 1 h apart. The apparent Km value was not affected by this activation of the enzyme. In all experiments, assays were grouped and started within 20-30 min Of each other. The release Of 14002 from a-[1-14C] KIC was com- pletely inhibited in the absence of oxygen (Table 2). This indi- cated that the a-KIC decarboxylase activity uses oxygen as an Figure 3. 43 Effect Of Time and Protein Concentration on Cytosolic a-Keto- isocaproate Decarboxylase Activity. In the upper figure 100 uL of a cytosol preparation (2.8 mg protein) was assayed in the presence (I) or absence (0) Of 1.5 M ammonium sulfate. In the lower figure the amount of cytosol preparation was varied. 44 1m 80 ca 2 60 .8 "' 4) ‘8 2 z 20 z) 40 60 80 100 MINUTES SE 2 c? ‘0 a 2 :z 1 1 l l l 1.0 2.0 MG CYTOSOL PROTEIN Figure 3 Figure 4. 45 Km =0.03mM l .20 -10 o 10 20 so 1/(«-KIC) (mu '1) Effect Of Substrate Concentration on Cytosolic o-Ketoisocap- roate Decarboxylase Activity. a-KIC decarboxylase activity vs. the concentration of a-KIC was determined under two dif- ferent assay conditions. Assays in A contained in a total volume Of 0. 4 mL, 0. 2 M Tris-maleate pH 6. 5, 1. 5 M ammonium sulfate, 1 mM NaZCO, 0.04-0.40 mM a-[1-14C] KIC (630 cpm/nmol) and .7 mg/ml cytosolic protein. The incuba- tion time was 15 or 30 min. Assays in B were done in a total volume of 0. 4 mL containing 33 mM 1Rotassium phosphate, pH 7.2, 1 mM Na CO3, 0.05-0.50 mM d-[1-1C] KIC (1,100 cpm/nmoli,3 and 2.1 mg/ml cytosolic protein. Incuba- tion time was 15 min. Two identical assays were done approximately 1 h apart; (0) first set Of assays, (0) second set of assays. Experimental points in both A and B were plotted and the best- -fitting lines drawn by computer analy- sis (HILKIN 2 PROGRAM, Michigan State University, East Lan- sing, MI). Initial velocities (V0) are expressed as nmol/min/mg cytosolic protein. Km and Vmax were determined by the data weighting procedure suggested by Hilkinson (144). C. 46 electron acceptor. The second column of Table 2 shows that rat liver cytosol preparations consume oxygen when d-KIC is added to the assay. In several experiments, using either the rat liver cytosol preparation or the partially purified o-KIC oxidase (Sephadex G-150 pool, see Table 5), 0.7-0.9 molecules of 02 were consumed fOr each C02 molecule released from a-KIC. Effect of a-Keto Acids on Cytosolic a-Ketoisocaproate Oxidase Activity Both assay methods gave similar results when the different a-keto acids were tested as inhibitors of the a-KIC oxidase (Table 2). 1 mM drKetOisovalerate, d-ketO-e-methylvalerate, d-ketobutyrate, d-ketononanoate, and phenylpyruvate strongly inhibited the decarboxylase and oxidase activity. Phenylpyru- vate is an exceptionally strong inhibitor, showing complete inhi- bition at 0.01 nM. a-Ketoisovalerate showed no inhibition at 0.01 mM. 1 mM d-ketoglutarate, pyruvate, o-ketO-Y-methiolbuty- rate, and arsenite, an inhibitor Of dihydrolipoyl transacetylase, had little effect at a concentration Of 1 mM. The oxidation Of various a-keto acids by a rat liver cytosol preparation is shown in Table 3. At a concentration Of 1 mM, the two branched-chain d-keto acids, d-ketoisovalerate and arketO-B- methylvalerate, as well as pyruvate, d-ketobutyrate, and a-keto- nonanoate caused little 02 consumption. However, o-keto-Y- methiolbutyrate, the keto analog of methionine, was oxidized by rat liver cytosol preparations at a rate approximately 2 times the rate Of a-KIC oxidation when both were assayed at a .chaocq me\:Hs\uoe:m=ou me so comma—ac moueH .05: we ummmogaxm mmHHH>HHom Hocucoun .;=_H we: OucocamoomHoumxiu we =o_uucucmu=oo aumm< .»u_>_uuo Hocucou as» we am :agu egos Lm>mc we: moueuHquL camzama quHHAeHLm> .mxumme aHmOHwamc at» we come as» men mm:_u> .mcogumz Lave: umchummu mm coHua52m=ou we go H< uogumzv omemHmc oueH An vmaemmu we: auH>HHuu mmevpxo mamocaeuomHoumxuom 47 . NoH 3.5.3.2 2: H - H Hue m=e_zv «H m oncogecocoumxno 25 H aw om mueLAH=aouoxue :5 H - om oueeae=a_o_gooe-»-eoog-o :5 H o o oue>=caaHacmgaua zs Ho.o o o mam>=caaHa=mgmua :5 H mm moH muecoua—mouoxua :5 H as m“ oum>=cxm as H aH mm mumcmHo>HA=um51nuoumxua :5 H mm mm muucmHm>omHouoxao :5 Ho.o a mH wuacwHe>omHouoxua :5 H aHme\e_e\_aEe em.ov eHms\e_e\HOEe o.HV ooH ooH HHocucouv ocoz HHocucou we av AHocacou mo my HcoHHonu gov copawcn< noszmcou «o wanna—me oueH aqu>Huoe «mauon oumocaauomHoumxuo monh<¢u ¢m>HH h<¢ zH >hH>Hhu< mmxo az< .uthwm¢< .moHu< chmxna mo mhumuum N u4mHuum wmmuon mumocaeuomHoquua wsu mw~HHHneum HoceqocaomH .HoceaoLQOmH «H OH woumznue we: acmaeccoaam esp .vmuguumHu aoHHma as» ecu cHE me so» a x coc.NN an venue -_cu:mu we; muucmmosos ugh .uoe as mew: mucoEHoocu HH< .coucmHn mcpcoz a :H cam mH cow uoNHcmmoec; we: mHOmzz .Lm~_:mmoso: mmm—m sangm>Hu Leave; a :_ mommeq N ha cage—How we: m_:h .Lm~_:wmosoz :ocucha a gap: .Omocuzm z mN. mo mosaHo> m o» N =_ muccuwm on Low mOEHH m um~wcmmoeos we: mHumzs uqmuxm mammHH :ucu mo.ov No.ov mcmcucaa mo.ov No.ov w—omsz eo.oV No.cv acme: vo.oV No.ov :Hocm mc.ov NH.o HucuHx No.o mm.o cw>HH ouncOHu>cmHoumx nuvHuHuuo mucocamOOmHouwx mueHuHuuo mama.» chmuoca me\:_s\umo:vcca NoucH «Hosev AHH>HHO< mcpueHzxoacuomo uHu< ouoxuo hxom¢ouem aAmE\=_s\HoE:v «Ac—stoe:v Hmav HHEV copuuucm vHou HHH>HHO~ HHH>HHO~ =Hmuoca OzaHo> oHCHoeam .eoo» Heed» mu>HH hHS6< .aooev 4 H2283. a coma we; sHooa moumc umaomaxm zozm on umuomccoo mH xgm>ouwmn .Hm uosumzv mcosuwz :_ me vocsmams we: AHH>HHOa Omeuon muuoeaeuomHoumxuoa ".O.H .coHHauHeHcsa one zmzoczu uchceo mmN.H Humpoca Ho: mew: mcoHuocewv NmH-ee no eH-~m me - ass—co memo oew .oH mHH aoH o.mm oeH.m mm He .ooa co~-m choaeaom .a He aNH H.Hm om~.m ONH ~.H eoeeeeeooeeo Hooa .Heeea .w ~.Hm ecu m.ee oco.m omH oom.H .ooa omoceeaoa Hseoee .H m.He awe e.Hm oom.eH wee mm eoHSoece Haeaeuu nooH-m~ .e .cowumu: 7:3 93 $0 Log—35mg mg» coach.» umtgou ma: spoon mouox «Hms\:Hs\o_oe=v aH=HE\uHos:v Hmsv HHEV eHoL a »e_>_oo< NSH>Hoo< eHoSoca oe=_e> oHCHooam _aooe Haeoe o onhHH h<¢ zozm mm. E m 0.4 4 4°C 2 E 0.3“ “‘1 20°C 1': O 2 . 7‘" 8 s :8 o 0.1? Room X 3 Temp. CD 53 . E3 .93 3; 0.5 _ l68mg proiem/mL E o ””.D- ----- “-O-BOOC g- 0.4 "‘7 gin 03 o 53 15 ' 41C: '§_ § 0.2 1‘? 0.1 “~.-20°c U . . 0 IO 20 Stability of the a-Ketoisocaproate Oxidase in a 12-Fold Pur- ified Preparation. Aliquots Of the “concentrated DEAE Pool" (Purification B) (B) or a 1:10 dilution Of the “concentrated DEAE Pool" (A) were stored at the temperatures indicated. a-KIC oxidase activity was monitored as in Methods (Method B). Frozen samples were only thawed once, then discarded. Values are the mean Of duplicate assays. 58 (‘5 o 01 O . Activity Remaining % 120°C a-Keioisocoprooie Oxidase IO 20 3O 40 Days Figure 6. Stability Of the a-Ketoisocaproate Oxidase in an 80-Fold Purified Preparation. Aliquots Of pooled fractions from the ‘“2nd DEAE column" Of Purification C (Table 7) were stored at the temperatures indicated. o-KIC oxidase activity was measured as in Methods (Method B). Frozen samples were thawed only once, then discarded. 100% is 42 nmole/min/mg protein for -80°C experiments and 31.7 nmole/min/mg protein for 4°C and -20°C experiments. Values are mean of duplicate assays. 59 .eHesem we HeHeaeLe a: mNV H: mN ee=Heeeee Hemme seem .maemme eueeHHeeL N we gees ego mu_:mem .HaaH>Hue< He:_uv uoe we emeceum whee w Le a ceywe ece HHHH>HHO< HeHHHeHV xHeueHeeEEH Hm eezuezv meeguez :_ we emcemees we: HHH>HHee emeeer eeeeceeeemHeuexie .HHE NH.oV eseHe> HeeHe eEem es» e» ecumenee wee: meeeeHHe HH< .ezesm mceHHHeee mg» :HHz uoe He eeeeeee:_ ace: HH oHaaH oomv e eoHHeoHLHL=a co .ee=_eo “(as new. oeH sate aeoHHoece eoHooa Lo HHe mH.ov mooseHH< an e me.e H.H~ HooHoceHoHeH_e 2E m + HocooHHe am mm m e.HH H.H~ HoHHoceHoHeHHQ :5 H + HoeooaHe um HoH e H.H~ a.e~ HoeooHHHoHeHoeez am aN e mH.H m.e~ HocooHHmoHeHoeoz HH NM e ma.H e.m~ HoHHoceeoHeHHo :5 m Hm e ee.a m.m~ HoHHoeeeoHeHHQ :5 H ee e e.HH e.e~ oeoz eeHeHeeoe eae He omecoem HeeHd He HHeH eoHH_ea< »u_>Hue< a ee mama :Heuece ma\=_s\eeeeeece cu H e—e2= auH>Hue< emeeon eueeceeee Heuexue Homuu>Hw «o .HOhHmmzththn .Hommu>4ocH:»ozoz mo muzmmume uzh zH mmhHHHmHHo< Heeoev . o>ooom a H.o._ .eoHHaoHHHesa oeH emaoeee eoHccao a; seen em: =Heee meeec eeueeexe seam ea eeueeccee mp xce>eeeme .m eeguez Ne emcemeee qu>HHee eee Hm eeHHeeHcheev meegue: :H eenpcemee we ce>HH we; see; eeHeHcee we: HHH>HHee emeeer eueeceeeemHeuexie eeH eHN eeH ome.H HH ee Hooe eo~-m HHgoaeaom .a m.oe am” e.- eoH.eH eHe ON eooaceeooeoo Hooa HHeoea .e H.4m eem H.mH emH.a «Hm who Hooa owoeaeaoa HHeoea .H m.~H eme He.e oee.~H eem.H ouH omoceeaem HHeoea-oee .e ceHHeOH$HL=e me» we LeeuweEec ezu :meecgu eeHLcee me: =Heee Neeem Hms\=_s\eHee:v H=_s\eHee=v Hmsv HHEV eeHHOeLm eHom a HHH>HHo< aHHsHHo< eHoHoca oesHo> oHeHooam HeHoH HeHoH mm>HH h<¢ tome mmwuee emeewxe uere .cseHee ewe—e—Hee u I5 2C> Eesog mM Effect of Peso? Concentration on d-Ketoisocaproate Oxidase Activity. d-K C oxidase activity was measured as in Methods (Method B) except for the variation of the Fe504 concen- tration. Each assay contained 10 uL (12 ug Protein) of the d-KIC oxidase (Sephacryl S-200 pool; Table 9). Values are mean of duplicate assays. 80 ' o o .z ' N 12.5 g 6 2.0 mM F9804 .aummu mgu cusp ocaux_s copam>wuuo use soc; cm>o mecca on use au.>_uoe eczocm $.08 3:2: 3 32¢ E .2 m5 3 v3.69. come“. 2:. .mucmswcmaxm $05 59¢ 33.28 mm: oaofiouvd .w can m mucms_coaxm mo madman o» wound no: _ou_ocguopza_u new owed co “cacao damn mwga .mmmodczd .ocacoo com .umxammm m=_ma msx~cm 0:» Edge cm>o xucmu on can me: e new ~ mucma_cquo co mnemmu =_ uemmmcg ~oupmcgu lopsu_u use eomom .czogm mm umpcm> ma: cargo; copuanao:_mca as» can .m>ona umumuwvcw mcopuacuzmucou mgu :. ucmmmca mew: pouwmcguopgupu use comm; .uouu_eo ma: ounncoumu unmuxo Am vogumzv avenue: :_ mm umxommo an; d_asam we» co 4: OH ..eoccaa =o_ca>_uaa. m_=c cauc< .Ahcav .ou_ac;uo_gu_e :5 o.~ ecu eomae :5 m.c c=o=c_z co =»_; u.m~ an 2; a Lac cacan=o=_ was Am d_n~c .m eacdad_c.c=av ._ooa co~-m .xgaagaam. deb m~.o om muc.o mm~o.o 8: m ~a.m co o.~ m.o oz K mo.o e mmc.o mu~o.o oz m ww.~ e O.“ m.o oz m ~a.~ om mmo.o mNHo.o mm» v o~.m on o.H m.o mm» m um.“ e mmo.o mm~o.o mm» N ~a.~ e o.~ m.o mm» H cwmuoca me\c;\m_osz Acpsv Azav Azav copcod u=m5_cqum aup>puu< gawk pea comm; copuu>puu< maven: acmmmcd mmocpxo u_xid copuMmmmuwacd bps :5 a .eommu :5 m.o copuacucmucoo Numm< .mcpm v0mm... >m mm~hu< Hg u4mwueHwe wee mwswu ewsue HH< .wswu eewN wen we uwm me: u Hewswewexm e» xwz eeueeweu we eewpweee wzw .maemme wueew—eee we eewe wee wwe—3 $3332.32. .E. H eee a: m5 .75 H we :ewueeueweeee Hemme Heeww e 9.33 Heewwefiewfiwe r... eH use .38 eweeeeme z: m 43$ 7... m: eweweweee xwz eeweeweu we» .weeust xemme egg on xwz eeaeeweo we 4: mm we eewuweee wee ewHwe mwewu meewee> we eweee we: wsxuew egg was» Hewexw Hm eeguwzv meegwwz cw me eweemews we: muw>wuee wmeewxe weeeeeeeemweewxie on Hw.o m.o m.omH eowH m moH mm.e m.o m.HoH HoH a ma w~.m ooH ooH o u mm wH.m me cm H m HeeHv e~.e m.e m.~ N < Heeueeu ewwueee ms\eg\wHeE: Hewsv Hewev _Aewav Hewswewexm we a haw>wuee wmeewxe uHxid wEANew eee xwz wsa~em xwz eeueeweu eeueeweu we eewuweee we :ewuwee< we eewuwee< ewwzuwe wewu we Heeee< we wsww we weww masthz >h—HHm 94 00 g» o [\J I 05 LC flVloleote] M Effect of Maleate Concentration on the d-Ketoisocaproate Oxidase Activity. d-KIC oxidase activity was assayed as in Methods (Method B) except the buffer used was maleic acid adjusted to pH 6.0 with Tris base. The concentration of maleate in the assay was varied as shown. Each assay contained 10 uL (12 ug Protein) of the Sephacryl S-200 pool (Table 9). Values are mean of duplicate assays. 95 TABLE 14 EFFECT OF ADP 0R EDTA ON a-KETOISOCAPROATE OXIDASE ACTIVITY QPKECOTSOCGPFOGCE Oxidase Activity Addition umole/hr/mg protein None 1.93 1 "M ADP 0.78 2 mM ADP 0.58 5 nM ADP 0.59 10 mM ADP 0.79 1.1 M EDTA 0.10 2 mM EDTA 0.11 5 MM EDTA 0.09 d-Ketoisocaproate oxidase activity was measured as in Methods (Method B) except 50 mM MES pH 6.0 was substituted fer 0.2 M Tris, 0.2 M maleate pH 6.5. ADP and EDTA were added as indicated. Each assay contained 10 uL (12 ug protein) of the Sephacryl S-200 pool (Purification B, Table 9). Values are mean of duplicate assays. E. 96 0.2 M maleate, pH 6.5 (5.78 vs. 5.75 umole/hr/mg protein of Seph- acryl S-200 pool). Maleate may activate the d-KIC oxidase by forming a chelate of Fe2+ which is favorable fer the catalytic reaction. EDTA and ADP, other iron chelators, were tested in the presence of 50 mM MES, a buffer which has very little tendency to bind metal ions (128). These compounds caused considerable inactivation of GPKIC oxidase activity (Table 14). Therefore, the d-KIC oxidase either prefers the Fe-maleate complex or maleate activates this enzyme by some other mechanism. The effect of time of preincubation of the e-KIC oxidase with FeSO4, ascorbate and dithiothreitol in the assay mixture befOre initiating the enzymatic reaction is shown in Figure 24. Optimal activation of the d-KIC oxidase was achieved after 60 min. Fur- ther preincubation, for up to 200 min, caused very little change in e-KIC oxidase activity. Substrate Specificity of the deKetoisocaproate Oxidase Crude preparations of rat liver cytosol (Table 3) oxidatively decarboxylated both GPKIC and d-keto-Y-methiolbutyrate (GPKYMB). In order to determine whether or not both of these d-keto acids are decarboxylated by the same enzyme, decarboxylation of a-[l- 14C] KIC and d-[1-14C] KYMB were monitored in the various purification fractions (Table 15). The ratio of decarboxylation of d-KIC to that of d-KYMB was approximately 1.0 and did not vary significantly throughout the purification. This indicates that 97 2‘ 2E gist a§4 58‘“ e?- {3 . I00 200 Preincubation Time Figure 24. Effect of Preincubation Time on a-Ketoisocaproate Oxidase Activity. d-KIC oxidase activity was assayed as in Methods (Method B) except for variation of the preincubation time. Each assay contained 10 uL (12 ug protein) of the Sephacryl S-200 pool (Table 9). Values are mean of duplicate assays. 98 TABLE 15 DECARBOXYLATION 0F orKETOISOCAPRDATE AND arKETO-Y-METHIOLBUTYRATE BY PURIFICATION FRACTIONS nmole 14C02/min/mg protein Ratio Fraction a-[1-14c1 :IgStrfifl-lm me 'aTaxviiIiE 10,000 x g supernatant 0.61 0.53 1.15 DEAE-cellulose pool 7.60 7.24 1.05 Phenyl pool concentrated 23.4 23.4 1.00 Sephacryl S-200 pool 94.5 95.2 0.99 Decarboxylation of arEl-14C] ketoisocaproate (GPKIC) and o—[l- 14C] keto-Y-methiolbutyrate (o-KYMB) were measured in purification fractions (see Table 9) by Method B. Values are mean of 2 determina- tions. 99 one enzyme catalyzes the decarboxylation of both of these sub- strates. The apparent Km's of the GPKIC oxidase fer GPKIC and QPKYMB were determined using optimized assay conditions (Figure 25). The apparent Km for oeKIC was 0.32 i 0.02 mM. The apparent Km for QPKYMB, however, was almost 6 times higher, 1.90 t 0.12 mM. The apparent Vmax determined in the presence of oeKYMB is higher than when determined in the presence of oeKIC as the substrate (247 t 6 vs. 130 t 3 nmole/min/mg protein). V. Studies on the Mechanism of the deKetoisocaproate Oxidase A. Product Identification An 18 fold purified preparation of d-KIC oxidase (Sephadex G-150 pool; Purification A) was used to determine the reaction products. d-[4,5-3H] KIC was incubated with the partially pur- ified enzyme and the products were separated by anion exchange chromatography. A profile similar to that shown in Figure 29A was obtained. Some radioactivity, possibly due to 3H20, eluted in the water wash (not shown in Figure 29A). Hhen e-[4,5- 3H] KIC was incubated under identical conditions, but without the enzyme preparation, only one peak cochromatographing with a-KIC was seen (data not shown). The major product, peak I of Figure 29A, was analyzed by gas- liquid chromatography (Figure 26). One major peak with a reten- tion time of 15.1 min was observed. Greater than 80% of the injected radioactivity was associated with this peak. Using this system, authentic o-hydroxyisovaleric acid, 3,3-dimethylacrylic 100 .HeeHv cemewaw: we ewumwmmzm weeeweeee mewugaww: ewee wee mewme AH: .mewmeew umem .xwwmew>we= weepm eemwgewz .z eee ex we mweHe> .meewueeHEewewe e we wmeew>e wee mweHe> .He wHeewv Heee oouim Haeeegewm wee we Hewweeee a: my H: m eweweeeee xemme :eem .meewaweamewe zuweeHw> Hewuwew wesmew ea ewwee> we: wewe eewueeeeew wee eee e:egm we ewwee> wew: mz»x mueHiHuie new uHx nueHngie we meeweeeweweeee we» .wmee wwew saw: o.m :e on ewamenee ewee ewe—es z ~.e we: ewwwee wee new we: N oo eomeocoeH me: we.» eowoeesoe_oee wee .meowoao_w_eoe me_3o__ow ego gee: He eoeeozv aooeeoz ew me ewxemme we: Hmv mz>x mueHiHuie ee Hwwe< Qmmflwxc OHQLEH:£—O..£Hfl=—l>l°00¥ld LO muflOc—Qfluom POHOXIO CO COFHQLHCNUCOU @Hflsumnam $0 Humwhm :5 @5er .22 82.3 e. w w. _ e .35. 6:5) acrezeeoawsagxwy\. no mw m. e .mr geeexoecawteuuxo; 2e «8 newts: %wmwmwmd 300,. m’ 8 .mN oe=e_e Figure 26. 101 54 2&7 '9' 242 CPM x i0'3 IO 20 30 TIME (MINUTES) Gas Chromatographic Profile of the Major Product of o-Keto- isocaproate Oxidase. The upper figure shows the gas-chroma- tographic profile of the major product of o-KIC oxidase iso- lated as described under Methods. Below this is shown the radioactive profile of the gas chromatograph effluent. 102 m. b} cg-clo’ n-nyaro-yuonuuc octa 1‘ methyl. «to: 30, 59 60 N ‘ noggin-cue .3 «‘1 9 ”$3“ «no , a «an. ., ._ 301 1!: - J) m «HAHH j: 40 so so :00 ten :40 :- 53 2 1”} Unknown 1, (to. acid “J 83‘ 59 > 0 85 — 6“ no al.-8.03 P Jr .¢ 4m 1% d 1} I.“ a an 0. 4. C. I. 1. 110 140 M/E Figure 27. Mass Spectrun of the Major Product of o-Ketoisocaproate Oxi- dase. The mass spectrum of standard a-hydroxyisovaleric acid, methyl ester (Michigan State University mass spectrum library No. 9052), is shown along with the mass spectrum of the free acid of the unknown compound with a retention time of 15.1 min on the gas chromatograph (Figure 26). 103 .ceee one» e. see e H Heweu wee we wmeueweewe ex» ea mewwwe xewe zeew w>eee ewee=e wgw .ueeewHe 43 H e cw eweHEewuwe euw>wweeeweee eee ewpewHHee wew: we m.H we meewueeew .Hu: 2 ~.o we omH eee Hewweeem Ho: 2 o~.o-~o.o eewewH e we .5 omH .uewweeem He: 2 No.eio eewewH e we we omH .ow: 42 w new: ween—w me: caeHee wsw .ee:Hee Hgmwe eemiooH. iHuiHixw:ee so Nu x m.o e e» ewwHeee we: eewueHem mwgu we we ewes» .Hs H.m ea ewumenee wseHe> eee o.e ea ewumenee :e we» .eewuemewweaewe he ew>eewe we: waeuwewewee ewwueee wgw .ewmewpwe NoueH eeeu e» ewe me ewe HwH eee ewee ewuweeeeeng iweu new we 4: cm we :ewuweee we ewueeHEeww me: eewueewe wgw .uomm we me: n ewueeeeew we: «web .weHEex: we ~.o neweweueee eee ewumeHe eewmees e eHw; sews: eee Eeewm e new: eweeee gene we: wee» wzw .eweee me: uHx HueHizuie we» .st eewueewe wee we mueweeeeee ewgae HHe we new» ieeeeewwee ewe me e ewpw< .Hmeegww: wwmv ew>eewe Heewex—mewsueees sew: wmeewxe uHxie we eewuee -aeoee .e o.eee. ..oee oe~-m .ecoaeeom. ago a. ..eoa-e-a. one ..oe.. eoeaee. ..oo.-e-e. eo._oa co .oe.. e..oa. .Hooa-e-.= wo .ea eHV d: mm eeo ...e= ee.ev oeaoceeoeo_eooe HewH-=m-o 2.. m6 .Heuwwefiewfiwe we. o.H .Eee eweeeeme 7... m6 .eomww r... c.H £02 5:: me e... e 3.5.3 :e ewee ewe—es z ~.o .mHew z ~.o "we oH.o we wasHe> Heeww e e. meweweweee st eeweeewe e :w wmeewxe weeeeeeeemweuwxie ewwwweee wee sew: ewueeeeew me: weeeeeeeemweuwx muvHiauie .wmee iwxo wueeeeeeemweuwXLe ewwwweew we» we mueaeeee eewueewm wsw we ageeemeueEeegu weweequ Hixw:ea .eN ocsmwe 104 em oe=m_. 8952 8.62... .unxm nqu. nxu~w nxu. H I 11- III H \I\\ttI\/>I\|/\..cwacttskl i: r\ V.I\\/olt \(x l N.o 0"]!!! \\l\ II/ «‘1 O\ON— . > .23.... HR - oe Izcxe/C so! a. .w flamh .. H . 02.6 H 4:“ wwe e m \ <>_.+mH .e Ffimm 14 1 4 1 4 1'“? 139 100 30 so 103 59 43 190. 1 {l4 1‘14 1mg»... a a 13. 140 10. M/E Figure 30 111 HH «H om om NN fl me +0 UIMIU .9 mm Km mm m“ OR o me «:9 HH ea mm mm mm a He :cuuumzu .0 mm c» on HN HR 0 am 0 H mm m m N am :Ouuumzu N V am me «e H Km :9 .m u m¢ cm Hm Ne me o mm o ~ m mm mH mH ~ No“ =o-u-m=u N m H¢ as Hm H meg ~19 .< =o-u Na Na m m m o mag o ouoLm—a>om— -xxcguagum gap: omawz N N wuqu d wuqxu msoum m\e newsman; a z 1o o o z o o comwonaucu o“ a” ”H mfi owfi mucaucana a mhzmzwom~>xoao>zuu nutmeg >44~zm z~ owa mo uuzummza cfi u4m<~ 112 when B-hydroxyisovaleric acid was produced in the presence of 1302 (Figure 308), 13% of the molecules incorporated 180 into the B-hydroxy position. Greater than 94% of the B-hydroxyisovaleric acid molecules contained at least one 180 atom. Since the 1302 used in this experiment contained 10% 1502, the value of 5-8% at m/e 103 indicates that all of the B-hydroxyisovaleric acid was labeled with at least one 180 atom. Hhen produced in the presence of H2130 (Figure 306), 60% of the B-hydroxyisovaleric acid molecules incorporated 180 into the B-hydroxyl group. Virtually all of the mole- cules contained at least one 180 atom, therefbre the carboxyl group was almost completely labeled with one 180 atom. When the previously formed product, B-hydroxyisovaleric acid was incubated with H2130 under conditions identical to those used for the enzymatic formation of a-hydroxyisovaleric acid (except QPKIC was omitted), no incorporation of 180 into the molecule was detected (Figure 300). DISCUSSION The results presented herein clearly demonstrate the existence of two separate aPKIC decarboxylating activities in rat liver; one mitochon- drial, the other cytosolic. No activity was detected in peroxisomes or microsomes. The mitochondrial QPKIC decarboxylase activity is due to the branched-chain asketo acid (BCKA) dehydrogenase (EC 1.2.4.3 and 1.2.4.4) which has recently become the fbcus of numerous investigations (1-4, 56-67). This enzyme uses all three branched-chain d-keto acids, GPKIC, a-ketoisovalerate and arketo-s-methylvalerate, as substrates and requires both CoA and NAD+ as cofactors. The mechanism of this enzyme is simi- lar to that of the pyruvate and dpketoglutarate dehydrogenase complexes (2). The cytosolic GPKIC decarboxylase activity does not utilize arketo- isovalerate and arketo-B-methylvalerate as substrates and does not require CoA or NAD+. This enzyme activity is due to an oxidase which decarboxylates and hydroxylates aPKIC to form B-hydroxyisovalerate (B- HIVA). This enzyme also utilizes arketo-Yemethiolbutyrate, the a—keto analogue of methionine, as a substrate. Previous investigations indicated that rat liver cytosolic GPKIC decarboxylating activity was insignificant in comparison to the activity of the mitochondrial BCKA dehydrogenase (1). However, even when using assay conditions which had been optimized for the mitochondrial BCKA 113 114 dehydrogenase, almost equal amounts of the mitochondrial and cytosolic GPKIC decarboxylase activities were fbund (see Figure 1). The cytosolic arKIC oxidase activity in rat liver is markedly affected by the nutri- tional and hormonal status of the animal. Dixon and Harper have fbund that when rats are fed a 50% casein diet for 6 days, cytosolic a-KIC decarboxylase activity increases approximately 3.5 times, whereas the mitochondrial BCKA dehydrogenase activity remains constant (111). Dia- betes also elevates rat liver cytosolic QPKIC decarboxylase activity without affecting the mitochondrial BCKA dehydrogenase (112). Therefore it appears that, at least in some situations, the cytosolic a-KIC oxidase may have an important role in leucine metabolism. The purification and characterization of this enzyme as well as the identification of the pro- ducts of the reaction should serve as a starting point for understanding the function(s) of this enzyme. The apparent Km of the purified cytosolic d-KIC oxidase fbr a—KIC was fbund to be 0.3 mM when Optimal assay conditions were used (Figure 25). This is 20 fold higher than the apparent Km of the mitochondrial BCKA dehydrogenase fbr a-KIC, which is 15 pH (3). The Km of the cyto-~ solic OPKIC oxidase for QPKIC, however, is quite dependent on the assay conditions employed. Using a crude rat liver cytosolic preparation in the presence of 1.5 M ammonium sulfate, the apparent Km of the a-KIC oxidase for GPKIC was 0.03 mM (see Figure 4). The actual affinity of this enzyme fbr GPKIC in 1112, therefore, may be quite different from that determined in 11559. The relative proportion of d-KIC utilized by the cytosolic QPKIC oxidase as compared to the mitochondrial BCKA dehydrogenase may also be 115 affected by factors other than Km. May gt al. (112) and Dixon and Har- per (111) have reported an increase in mitochondrial BCKA dehydrogenase activity after freeze-thawing of mitochondria from rat liver. This may be due to an increase in the activity of BCKA dehydrogenase due to freeze-thawing or to an increase in accessibility of the BCKA dehydrogen- ase to its substrate. If the latter possibility is true then transport of the a-keto acids into the mitochondria may be rate limiting in some situations. A transporter(s) of the BCKA has been identified in rat liv- er (129,130) and may be very important in regulation of BCAA metabolism. The Km for transport of aPKIC into isolated rat liver mitochondria is 0.2-0.5 mM (131), which is several fbld greater than the Km of the mitochondrial BCKA dehydrogenase for d-KIC (3). The subcellular pool in which arKIC is produced nay also determine which enzyme (GPKIC oxidase or BCKA dehydrogenase) metabolizes this com- pound. The branched-chain amino acid transaminase is located both in the mitochondrial and cytosolic compartments of rat liver (26). Therefore, BCKA's can be formed in at least two different intracellular pools. The activation of the d-KIC oxidase by ferrous iron (Fe2+), ascorbate (NADH or NADPH), and a sulfhydryl compound is typical of many non-heme iron oxygenases (132). Other metal ions tested were unable to substitute for Fe2+. Ferric iron (Fe3+), however, was equally effective as Fe2+ in activation of the d-KIC oxidase when ascorbate was present. This may be due to the reduction of Fe3+ to Fe2+ by ascorbate. The stimulatory affect of ascorbate on the a-KIC oxidase appears to be solely due to reduction of iron to the ferrous state 116 (Fe2+). In the presence of high concentrations of Fe2+, ascor- bate has no effect. Other reducing agents such as NADH and NADPH can replace ascorbate. FeSO4 activation of the arKIC oxidase persists fbr up to 10 minutes after removal of FeSO4 by dilution (see Figure 19). However, d-KIC oxidase activity quickly diminishes thereafter if FeSO4 is not present in the assay mixture. This may be explained by a weak association of Fez+ with the enzyme, either at the active site or at another site which may be necessary to provide the proper conformation of the enzyme for catalytic activity. The GPKIC oxidase activity requires the presence of a reduced sulf- hydryl compound, such as dithiothreitol or CoASH. Monothioglycerol at a concentration of 0.6 M (5%) stabilizes the purified enzyme when stored at 4°C. These results indicate that the enzyme contains sulfhydryl groups which must be reduced in order fbr the enzyme to express catalytic activ- ity. The stabilization of the a—KIC oxidase by monothioglycerol may not be entirely due to its ability to keep enzyme sulfhydryl groups reduced. Monothioglycerol at a concentration of 0.12 M (1%) should be a good sulfe hydryl reducing agent, yet does not prevent d-KIC oxidase inactivation. The higher concentration of monothioglycerol (0.61 M) may also protect the enzyme from inactivation by removing oxygen from the solution. Sev- eral dioxygenases are known to be inactivated by oxygen (132,133). Optimal activity of the purified d-KIC oxidase occurs at pH 6.0 in the presence of 0.2 M maleate, 1 mM FeSO4, 0.5 mM ascorbate and 1 mM dithiothreitol. The low pH optimum of this enzyme may be due to the fact that Fe2+ is rapidly oxidized at higher pH to ferric hydroxide. In 117 reactions carried out at pH 7.0 or greater, assay mixtures developed a reddish-brown color. At pH 6.0 or 6.5 this was not detectable. Increasing maleate concentration from 50 uM to 0.2 M gave almost a 2 fold increase in the QPKIC oxidase activity. This increased activity was not due to ionic strength of the buffer. Maleate may complex with Fe2+ in a fbrm which is favorable for catalytic activity. Other met- al chelators tested, EDTA and ADP, could not replace maleate and actually inhibited uPKIC oxidase activity. Our results indicate that the cytosolic a-KIC oxidase consumes 0.7- 0.9 mol of 02 per mole of C02 released from a—KIC (Table 2). This ratio is consistent with the formation of s-hydroxyisovalerate from d-KIC. The expected value of 1.0 was probably not achieved due to the fbrmation of small amounts of products other than B-hydroxyisovalerate (i.e., peaks II and III, Figure 29A). Isovalerate is not a free (undis- sociated) intermediate in the conversion of a-KIC to a-hydroxyisovaler- ate. Partially purified d-KIC oxidase preparations converted d-KIC but not isovalerate to B-hydroxyisovalerate. 5,3-Dimethylacrylic acid also failed to yield s-hydroxyisovalerate when incubated with the purified d-KIC oxidase (unpublished observation). In order to determine the enzymatic mechanism of B-hydroxyisovalerate formation, incorporation of 180 from 1802 or H2180 was determined (see Figure 31). When GPKIC was incubated in the presence of 1302 gas, greater than 92% of the e-hydroxyisovalerate molecules incorporated one 180 atom into the carboxyl group. In 15% of the molecules, one atom of 130 was also incorporated into the a-hydroxyl CHOOH CH2 '18 02 CH3-C—OH CH3 18 ~15% c”oon CH2 CHa-cflou CH3 H2180 ~60% Figure 31. 118 CHOOH CH2 CH3-C—OH CH3 ”85% CHOOH CH2 CHa-C-OH CH3 ~30% Incorporation of 130 from 1302 or s-Hydroxyisovaleric Acid. COOH CH2 CH3-C-OH CH3 <896 COOH CH2 CH3-C-0H CH3 <696 H2180 into 119 group. These results indicate that both oxygen atoms incorporated into a-hydroxyisovalerate originate from 02. The incorporation of one 180 atom from H2130 into the carboxyl group is not at variance with this proposal, since GPKEtO acids exchange the ketonic oxygen with water (134). The low incorporation of 180 from 1302 into the hydroxyl position of B-HIVA could be explained by exchange with water. This is indeed the case. When GPKIC is incubated with the arKIC oxidase in the presence of H2130, 60% of the a-HIVA molecules contain one 180 atom in the hydroxyl group. 180 from gaseous 1302 can not exchange into this hydroxyl position (134), therefore, incorporation of molecular 1302 must be enzymatic. when B-hydroxyisovalerate is incubated with H2130 under identi- cal reaction conditions used fbr other 130 experiments (minus GPKIC) no incorporation of 180 occurs. Therefbre, exchange of the hydroxyl oxygen with H20 must occur with an intermediate of the reaction. A mechanism for the OPKIC oxidase reaction, consistent with the results is shown in Figure 32. This mechanism was proposed by Hamilton for dioxygenases which require an d-keto acid as a cosubstrate (135,136). In the case of a—KIC an intramolecular reaction mechanism may be involved with the d-keto group of d-KIC itself serving as the cosubstrate. This mechanism involves the fbrmation of a peracid from the reaction of enzyme bound FezT, 02 and d-KIC, as shown. The peracid could then act to insert an oxenoid oxygen at an unactivated C-H bond in the way that nitrenes and carbenes insert. The products of the reaction would then be s-hydroxyisovalerate, C02 and the regenerated enzyme-Fe2+ complex. Lindblad gt al. have proposed a similar mechanism for the enzymatic formation of homogentisate from p-hydroxyphenylpyruvate by nucleophilic attack at the carbonyl I I I IV perisovalerate H20 H202 minor reaction attack of oxenoid oxygen at ficarbon v . '0 '1') 0H M M 0 O V VI isovalerate 29.-hydroxyisovalerate Figure 32. Proposed Mechanism of the a-Ketoisocaproate Oxidase Reaction. 121 p-hydroxyphenylpyruvate hydroxylase (134). This enzyme also requires Fe2+ and ascorbate fbr maximal activity. The results of their 180 incorporation experiments using 1302 and H2130 are very similar to the results reported herein for the uPKIC oxidase. The regeneration of Fe2+ during the enzymatic reaction would explain why the a-KIC oxidase retains activity even after the unbound Fe2+ is removed from the assay by dilution (Figure 19). The loss of activity by 20 min may be accounted for by a slow dissociation of iron from the enzyme due to weak binding at the active site. The enzymatic formation of isovalerate (peak III, Figure 28 and 29) could be explained by the mechanism proposed. The breakdown of periso- valerate before formation of B-HIVA would lead to the formation of iso- valerate. This uncoupling of the decarboxylation and hydroxylation reac- tions has been observed with prolyl hydroxylase (137). The d-KIC oxidase activity is inhibited by other branched-chain and long-chain a-keto acids. Phenylpyruvate is an especially potent inhibi- tor of this activity. In patients with phenylketonuria, phenylpyruvate accumulates in the body fluids. An a-KIC oxidase similar to that de- scribed herein has also been fbund in human liver (unpublished observa- tion). Inhibition of this enzyme by phenylpyruvate may adversely affect leucine catabolism in patients with phenylketonuria. a-Hydroxyisovaleric acid has been identified in the urine of patients with several different types of clinical disorders (104,105,108,109,138). It is currently believed that this compound is produced by hydration of B-methylcrotonyl-CoA (139) followed by hydrolysis of the resulting 122 a-hydroxyisovaleryl-CoA fbrmed. The cytosolic QPKIC oxidase, however, can catalyze the fbrmation of a-hydroxyisovalerate directly from a-KIC. This enzyme has only been fbund in the liver and kidney of rats. No activity was detected in brain, heart, skeletal muscle or pancreas. The OPKIC oxidase may function as a ”safety valve“ to prevent buildup of GPKIC, which is quite toxic. The tissue distribution of this enzyme is consistent with such a function. Tanaka gt 31. identified high amounts of a-hydroxyisovaleric acid in the urine of patients with isovaleric acidemia (104). This disease is due to a block at the isovaleryl-CoA dehydrogenase (IOO), therefore, no B-methylcrotonyl-CoA is fbrmed. Since B-hydroxyisovalerate was presumed to be fbrmed from a-methylcrotonyl-CoA, this observation was puzzling. The presence in humans of the a-KIC oxidase which forms a-hydroxyisoval- erate directly from a-KIC could explain this inconsistency. Landaas (108,109) has identified B-hydroxyisobutyric acid, B-hydroxy- isovaleric acid, and d-methyl~3-hydroxybutyric acid in the urine of keto- acidotic patients and has shown that these acids arise from the metabo- lism of valine, leucine, and isoleucine, respectively. He found a posi- tive correlation between the concentration of these acids and the degree of ketoacidosis in a variety of clinical disorders. The branched-chain amino acids are metabolized similarly via transamination, decarboxyla- tion, and dehydrogenation to fbrm methylacryl-CoA (from valine), a-meth- ylcrotonyl-CoA (from leucine), and tiglyl-CoA (from isoleucine). Hydra- tion of these compounds would yield the B-hydroxy acids, which are seen. However, there are several reasons to question this pathway for formation of the B-hydroxy acids. If the fbrmation of these B-hydroxy acids was due to a block in branched-chain amino acid metabolism, as indicated by 123 the high serum levels of the branched-chain amino acids, then one would expect other intermediates, such as B-methylcrotonylglycine or isovaleric acid (100,105,138) to accumulate. Landaas notes that although leucine, isoleucine, and valine accumulate in the serum of ketoacidotic patients, other metabolites of branched-chain amino acid metabolism are not seen (109). A cytosolic QPKIC oxidase activity with properties similar to those described fbr the rat liver enzyme has also been identified in human liver (unpublished observation). This enzyme may be responsible, at least partially, fbr production of the B-hydroxyisovalerate which accumulates in these patients. The rat liver cytosolic a-KIC oxidase also uses arketo-Y-methiolbuty- rate (the keto analog of methionine) as a substrate. The affinity of this enzyme for a-keto-Y-methiolbutyrate (apparent Km = 1.9 all) is much less than that for a—KIC (apparent Km 2 0.3 mM). The product fbrmed by the aeKIC oxidase from arketo-Y-methiolbutyrate has not yet been identi- fied, but migrates identically to s-hydroxyisovalerate using Dowex-l chloride chromatography (unpublished observation; see Figure 29). If the reaction is similar to the GPKIC oxidase reaction, the expected product would be 3-hydroxy-3-methylthiopropionate. The product of this reaction is not 3-methylthiopropionate. 3-Methylthiopropionic acid can be extrac- ted into diethyl ether (140). The product of the GPKIC oxidase reaction using aeketo-Y-methiolbutyrate as a substrate cannot be extracted into diethylether (unpublished observation). Steele and Benevenga (140) showed that rat liver homogenates can transaminate methionine to form arketo-Y-methiolbutyrate and decarboxy- late acketo-Y-methiolbutyrate to fbrm 3-methylthiopropionate. In rat liver, 75% of the decarboxylase activity is associated with the 124 mitochondrial fraction and 15% is cytosolic (141). They reported a high Km (>1 mM) for the cytosolic arketo-Y-methiolbutyrate decarboxylase activity. This is consistent with the results presented here and indi- cates that this activity may only be of importance when methionine or c-keto-Y-methiolbutyrate levels are extremely elevated, as in hypermeth- ioninaemia (142). The mitochondrial arketo4Y-methiolbutyrate decarboxylase activity has a Km of 0.1-0.6 mM fOr its substrate (141). This activity appears to be due to the BCKA dehydrogenase (143). The utilization of d-keto-Y- methiolbutyrate by the same cytosolic and mitochondrial enzymes that met- abolize GPKIC is interesting, especially since rat liver also contains an enzyme that transaminates both leucine and methionine to fbrm these a—keto acids (25). LIST OF REFERENCES 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 125 LIST OF REFERENCES Hohlhueter, R.M. and Harper, A.E. (1970) J. Biol. Chem. 245, 2391- 2401. Petit, F.H., Yeaman, S.J. and Reed, L.J. (1978) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 15, 4881-4885. Parker, P.J. and Randle, P.J. (1978) FEBS Lett. 29, 183-186. Johnson, H.A. and Connelly, J.L. (1972) Biochemistry 11, 1967-1973. Connelly, J.L., Danner, D.J. and Bowden, J.A. (1968) J. Biol. Chem. gig, 1193-1203. Grant, H.D. and Connelly, J.L. (1974) Fed. Proc. 33, 1570. Grant, H.D. and Connelly, J.L. (1975) Fed. Proc. 34, 640. Goedde, H.H. and Keller, H. (1967) in Amino Acid Metabolism and Genetic Variation (Nyhan, H.L., ed.) pp. 191-215, McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York. Kean, E.A. and Morrison, E.Y.St.A. (1979) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 561, 12-17. Choi, Y.R., Fogle, P.J., Clarke, P.R.H. and Bieber, L.L. (1977) J. Biol. Chem. 252, 7930-7931. Bieber, L.L. and Choi, Y.R. (1977) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 14, 2795-2798. Bieber, L.L., Sabourin, P.J., Fogle, P.J., Valkner, K. and Lutnick, R. (1980) in Carnitine Biosynthesis, Metabolism, and Functions (Frenkel, R. and McGroarty, J.D., eds.). pp. 159-176, Academic Press, New York. Choi, Y.R., Fogle, P.J. and Bieber, L.L. (1979) J. Nutr. 109, 155- 161. Fogle, P.J. and Bieber, L.L. (1979) Biochem. Med. 22, 119-126. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. 27. 28. 29. 30. 31. 32. 33. 34. 126 Solberg, H.E. and Bremer, J. (1970) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 222, 372 -380 o Choi, Y.R., Clarke, P.R.H. and Bieber, L.L. (1979) J. Biol. Chem. 251. 5580-5583. Hsieh, B. and Talbert, N.E. (1976) J. Biol. Chem. gg1, 4408-4415. Markwell, M.A.K., McGroarty, E.J., Bieber, L.L. and Tolbert, N.E. (1973) J. Biol. Chem. 248, 3426-3432. Rosenthal, J., Angel, A. and Farkas, J. (1974) Am. J. Physiol. 226, 411-418. Stillway, L.H., Heigand, D.A. and Buse, M.G. (1979) Lipids 14, 127-131. Ichihara, A., Noda, C. and Ogawa, K. (1972) Adv. Enzyme Regul. 11, 155-166. Aki, K., Yoshimura, T. and Ichihara, A. (1973) J. Biochem. 14, 779-7840 Aki, K., Yokojima, A. and Ichihara, A. (1969) J. Biochem. 65, 539- 544. Ikeda, T., Konishi, Y., and Ichihara, A. (1976) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 425. 622-531. Ichihara, A. and Koyama, E. (1966) J. Biochem. 59, 160-169. Shirai, A. and Ichihara, A. (1971) J. Biochem. 19, 741-748. Ogawa, K., Yokojima, A. and Ichihara, A. (1970) J. Biochem. 68, 901-911. Ichihara, A., Noda, C. and Tanaka, K. (1981) Dev. Biochem. 18, 227-231. Aki, K., Ogawa, K. and Ichihara, A. (1968) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 152, 276-284. Taylor, R.T. and Jenkins, R.T. (1966) J. Biol. Chem. 241, 4396- 4405. Tischler, M.E. and Goldberg, A.L. (1980) Am. J. Physiol. 238, E487-E493. Odessey, R., Khairallah, E.A. and Goldberg, A.L. (1974) J. Biol. Chem. gig, 7623-7629. Tischler, M.E. and Goldberg, A.L. (1980) J. Biol. Chem. 255, 8074- 8081. 35. 36. 37. 38. 39. 40. 41. 42. 43. 44. 45. 46. 47. 48. 49. 50. 51. 52. 53. 54. 127 Odessey, R. and Goldberg, A.L. (1979) Biochem. J. 118, 475-489. Danner, D.J., Lemmon, S.K., Besharse, J.C. and Elsas, L.J. (1979) do 8101. Chem. 334-, 5522'5526. Noda, C., Rhead, H.J. and Tanaka, K. (1980) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 11, 2646-2650. Hall, C.L. (I981) Dev. Biochem. 11, 35-40. Ikeda, Y., Noda, C. and Tanaka, K. (1981) Dev. Biochem. 1g, 41-46. Miller, L.L. (1962) in Amino Acid Pools (Holden, J.T., ed.). pp. 708-721, Elsevier, Amsterdam. Felig, P. (1975) Annu. Rev. Biochem. 35, 933-955. Abumrad, N.N., Patrick, L., Rannels, S.L. and Lacy, N.N. (1981) Dev. Biochem. 1g, 317-322. Pardridge, R.M., Casanello-Ertl, D. and Duducgian-Vartavarian, L. Awapara, J. and Seale, B. (1952) J. Biol. Chem. 191, 497-502. Shinnick, F.L. and Harper, A.E. (1976) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 111, 477-486. Ichihara, A., Noda, C. and Goto, M. (1975) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 61, 1313-1318. Khatra, 8.5., Chawla, R.K., Sewell, C.H. and Rudman, D. (1977) J. Clin. Invest. 52, 558-564. Dancis, J., Hutzler, J. and Levitz, M. (1961) Biochim. Biophys. A4313 2,! 60-640 Goldberg, A.L. and Odessey, R. (1972) Am. J. Physiol. 131, 1384- 1391. Tischler, M.E. and Goldberg, A.L. (1980) Am. J. Physiol. 118, E480-E486. Odessey, R. and Goldberg, A.L. (1972) Am. J. Physiol. 121, 1376-1383. Chang, T.H. and Goldberg, A.L. (1978) J. Biol. Chem. 153, 3677-3684. Odessey, R. and Goldberg, A.L. (1979) Biochem. J. 118, 475-489. Livesey, G. and Lund, P. (1980) Biochem. J. 188, 705-713. 55. 56. 57. 58. 59. 60. 61. 62. 63. 64. 65. 66. 67. 68. 69. 70. 71. 72. 73. 74. 75. 128 Elia, M. and Livesey, G. (1981) Oev. 8iochem. 18, 257-262. Noda, C. and Ichihara, A. (1976) J. Biochem. 88, 1159-1164. Buffington, C.K., DeBuysere, M.S. and Olson, M.S. (1979) J. Biol. Chem. ggg, 10453-10458. Odessey, R. (1980) FEBS Lett. 181, 306-308. Naymack, P.P., DeBuysere, M.S. and Olson, M.S. (1980) J. Biol. Chem. 888, 9773-9781. Randle, P.J., Lau, K.S. and Parker, P.J. (1981) Dev. Biochem. 18, 13-220 ' Odessey, R. (1981) Dev. Biochem. 18, 23-28. Danner, D.J., Sewell, E.T. and Elsas, L.J. (1980) Dev. Biochem. 1_8_, 29-34. Aftring, R.P., May, M.E. and Buse, M.G. (1981) Dev. Biochem. 18, 67-72. Patel, T.8. and Olson, M.S. (1981) Dev. Biochem. 18, 79-84. Buffington, C.K., Haymack, P.P., Debuysere, M.S. and Olson, M.S. (1981) Dev. Biochem. 18, 85-90. Van Hinsbergh, V.H., Veerkamp, J.H., Engelen, P.J.M. and Ghijsen, Van Hinsbergh, V.N.M., Veerkamp, J.H. and Zuurveld, J.G.E.M. (1978) FEBS Lett. 88, 100-104. Paul, H.S. and Adibi, S.A. (1978) Am. J. Physiol. g1, 15494-5499. Van Hinsbergh, V.H.M., Veerkamp, J.H. and Cordewener, J.H.G. May, M.E., Aftring, R.P. and Buse, M.G. (1980) J. Biol. Chem. 888, 8394-8397. Solberg, H.E. and Bremer, J. (1970) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 888, 372-380. Parker, P.J. and Randle, P.J. (1978) Biochem. J. 111, 751-757. Bremer, J. and Davis, E.J. (1978) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 888, 269- 275. 76. 77. 78. 79. 80. 81. 82. 83. 84. 85. 86. 87. 88. 89. 90. 91. 92. 93. 129 Craine, J.E. and Connelly, J.L. (1970) Anal. Biochem. 88, 539-546. Fulks, R.M., Li, J.B. and Goldberg, A.L. (1975) J. Biol. Chem. 3.5.9. 290-298. Buse, M.G. and Reid, M. (1975) J. Clin. Invest. 88, 1250-1261. Morgan, H.E., Chua, 8.H., Boyd, T.A. and Jefferson, L.S. (1981) Dev. Biochem. 18, 217-226. Goldberg, A.L. and Tischler, M.E. (1981) Dev. Biochem. 18, 205- 216. Blackburn, G.L., Desai, S.P., Keenan, R.A., Bentley, 8.T., Moldawer, L.L. and Bistrian, 8.R. (1981) Dev. Biochem. 18, 521-526. Hutton, J.C., Sener, A. and Malaisse, N.J. (1980) J. Biol. Chem. 888, 7340-7346. Malaisse, H.J., Hutton, J.C., Carpinelli, A.R., Herchuelz, A. and Sener, A. (1980) Diabetes 88, 431-437. Hutton, J.C., Sener, A. and Malaisse, H.J. (1979) Biochem. J. 184, 303-31 1 o Lenzen, S. (1978) Biochem. Pharmacol. 81, 1321-1324. Holze, S. and Panten, U. (1979) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 88, 211- 218. Shinnick, F.L. and Harper, A.E. (1977) J. Nutr. 181,, 887-895. Chang, T.H. and Goldberg, A.L. (1978) J. Biol. Chem. 888, 3696- 3701. Lysiak, R., Stepinski, J. and Angielski, S. (1970) Acta Biochim. Pol. 11, 131-141. Bowden, J.A., McArthur III, C.L. and Fried, M. (1971) Biochem. Med. 8, 101-108. Bowden, J.A., Brestel, E.P., Cope, R.T., McArthur III, C.L., Hestfall, D.N. and Fried, M. (1970) Biochem. Med. 1, 69-76. Dancis, J. and Levitz, M. (1972) in The Metabolic Basis of Inherited Disease (Stanbury, J.8., Hyngaarden, J.8. and Fredrickson, D.S., eds.) p. 426-439, McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York. Snyderman, S.E. (1967) in Amino Acid Metabolism and Genetic Variation (Nyhan, H.L., ed.) pp. 171-183, McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York. 130 94. Snyderman, S.E., Norton, P.M., Roitman, E. and Holt, L.E. (1964) Pediatrics 81, 454-472. 95. Donnell, G.N., Liverman, E., Shaw, K.N.F. and Koch, R. (1967) Am. J. Dis. Child. E, 60-63. 96. Greenberg, R. and Reaven, G. (1966) Pediatrics 81, 934-941. 97. Tanaka, K., Budd, M.A., Efron, M.L., Isselbacher, K.J. (1966) PT‘OC. Nat]. kado 5C1. U.S.A. ii, 236-2420 98. Shih, V.E., Mandell, R. and Tanaka, K. (1973) Clin. Chim. Acta 88, 437-439. 99. Tanaka, K., Mandell, R. and Shih, V.E. (1976) J. Clin. Invest. 88, 164-172. 100. Rhead, H.J. and Tanaka, K. (1980) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 71, 580-5830 101. Rhead, R., Dubiel, B. and Tanaka, K. (1981) Dev. Biochem. 18, 395-400 0 102. Tanaka, K. and Isselbacher, K.J. (1967) J. Biol. Chem. 818, 2966- 2972. 103. Hishnick, M.M. and Gray, C. (1981) Dev. Biochem. 18, 389-394. 104. Tanaka, K., Orr, J.C. and Isselbacher, K.J. (1968) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 188, 638-641. 105. Chalmers, R.A., Lawson, A.M. and Hatts, R.M.E. (1974) Clin. Chim. Acta 88, 43-51. 106. Finnie, M.D.A., Cottrall, K., Seakins, J.H.T. and Snedden, H. (1976) Clin. Chim. Acta 18, 513-519. 107. Gompertz, 0., Bartlett, K., Blair, 0. and Stern, C.M.M. (1973) Arch. Dis. Child. 88, 975-977. 108. Landaas, S. (1974) Clin. Chim. Acta 88, 39-46. 109. Landaas, S. (1975) Clin. Chim. Acta 88, 143-154. 110. Felig, F.H., Marliss, E., Ohman, J.L. and Cahill, G.F. (1970) Diabetes 18, 727-729. 111. Dixon, J.L. and Harper, A.E. (1981) Fed. Proc. 88, 900. 112. May, M.E., Mancusi, V.J. and Buse, M.G. (1979) Fed. Proc. 88, 1028. 113. Murphy, P.A., Krahling, J.8., Gee, R., Kirk, J.R. and Tolbert, N.E. (1979) Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 188, 179-185. 114. 115. 116. 117. 118. 119. 120. 121. 122. 123. 124. 125. 126. 127. 128. 129. 130. 131. 132. 133. 134. 131 Tolbert, N.E. (1974) Methods Enzymol. 81, 734-746. Racker, E. (1950) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1, 211-214. Pederson, T.C., Buege, J.H. and Aust, 5.0. (1973) J. Biol. Chem. 858, 7134-7141. Rudiger, H.H., Langenbeck, U. and Goedde, H.H. (1972) Biochem. J. 188, 445-446. Meister, A. (1952) J. Biol. Chem. 181, 309-317. Robinson, J. and Cooper, J.M. (1970) Anal. Biochem. 88, 390-399. Lowry, O.H., Rosebrough, N.J., Farr, A.L. and Randall, R.J. (1951) J. Biol. Chem. 188, 265-275. Bieber, L.L., Abraham, T. and Helmrath, T. (1972) Anal. Biochem. 88, 509-518. Bradfbrd, M.M. (1976) Anal. Biochem. 18, 248-253. Laemmli, U.K. (1970) Nature 888, 680-685. Bonner, R.M. and Laskey, R.A. (1974) Eur. J. Biochem. 88, 83-88. Abbot, M.T. and Undenfriend, S. (1974) in Molecular Mechanisms of Oxygen Activation (Hayaishi, 0., ed.), pp. 167-214, Academic Press, New York. Kaufman, S. and Fisher, 0.8. (1970) J. Biol. Chem. 818, 4745-4750. Andrews, P. (1965) Biochem. J. 88, 595-606. Good, N.E. and Izawa, S. (1972) Methods Enzymol. 81, 53-68. Patel, T.8., Haymack, P.P. and Olson, M.S. (1980) Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 881, 629-635. Mackay, N. and Robinson, 8. (1981) Dev. Biochem. 88, 227-231. Williamson, J.R., Halajtys-Rode, E. and Coll, K.E. (1979) J. Biol. Chem. 881, 11511-11520. Nozaki, M. (1974) in Molecular Mechanisms of Oxygen Activation (Hayaishi, 0., ed.), pp. 135-165, Academic Press, New York. Hebber, S., Harzer, G. and Whiteley, J.M. (1980) Anal. Biochem. 188, 63-72. Lindblad, 8., Lindstedt, G. and Lindstedt, S. (1970) J. Am. Chem. Soc. 88, 7446-7449. 135. 136. 137. 138. 139. 140. 141. 142. 143. 144. 132 Hamilton, G.A. (1974) in Molecular Mechanisms of Oxygen Activation (Hayaishi, 0., ed.), pp. 405-451, Academic Press, New York. Walsh, C., ed. (1979) Enzymatic Reaction Mechanisms. pp. 501-521, W.H. Freeman and Company, San Francisco. Hayaishi, 0., Nozaki, M. and Abbott, M.T. (1975) in The Enzymes (Boyer, P.D., ed.) 3rd Ed., Vol. 12, pp. 119-189, Academic Press, New York. Charles, B.M., Hosking, G., Green, A., Pollit, R., Bartlett, K. and Taitz, L.S. (1979) Lancet 8, 118-120. Coon, M.J., Robinson, W.G. and Bachhawat, B.K. (1955) in A Symposium on Amino Acid Metabolism (McElroy, W.D. and Glass, 8., eds.), pp. 431-441, Johns Hapkins Press, Baltimore. Steele, R.D. and Benevenga, N.J. (1978) J. Biol. Chem. 888, 7844- 7850. Dixon, J.L. and Benevenga, N.J. (1979) J. Nutr. 188, xxvi. Perry, T.L. (1967) Can. Med. Assoc. J. 81, 1067-1072. Livesey, G. (1981) Dev. Biochem. 18, 143-148. Wilkinson, G.N. (1961) Biochem. J. 88, 324-332.