“r 1.“ fig?! "3' I'll 3”“). I"|J‘. ['1' ‘9‘! . ‘ — ”I.“ l “WU III!" 1- .r ""1". _ A, .."~T.HL' u o m; MIMI?” fl“ ..I,,‘ 1. it“ 1 (”ass I'L‘ N '2 “J‘ mirt‘ ' .. .m... r mn_-l%,..“‘W-.‘ ‘. {w "%fii:f- V1 31b J. V, '11.‘.-‘. .J 9‘13) .L‘u 524.}. 1-11 . Judy _ -t.”"‘":v -.‘ .1“; ~ - 'Taiu Ma's .-‘r.'--- - ‘T.'¢r..,{ a’. u :13} : I». ‘ ' ' . .1 'II F '9. 5'.» 1‘" ‘ i .' HI .‘ ‘-‘ This is to certify that the dissertation entitled USE OF DI—ARYNE EQUIVALENTS IN THE SYNTHESIS OF NOVEL ARENES presented by Mary Ann Babin Meador has been accepted towards fulfillment of the requirements for Ph.D. degreein Chemistry 4 Major professor DMe November 11, 1983 MSU is an Affirmative Action I’Equal Opportunity Institution 0— 12771 )V1531_} RETURNING MATERIALS: Place in book drop to LIBRARIES remove this checkout from _—. your record. FINES will be charged if book is returned after the date stamped below. USE OF DI—ARYNE EQUIVALENTS IN THE SYNTHESIS OF NOVEL ARENES By Mary Ann Babin Meador A DISSERTATION Submitted to Michigan State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Department of Chemistry 1983 ABSTRACT USE OF DI-ARYNE EQUIVALENTS IN THE SYNTHESIS OF NOVEL ARENES By Mary Ann Babin Meador Di-aryne equivalents, generated from tetrahalobenzenes and n-butyllithium, were used to synthesize a variety of peri- substituted anthracenes and phenanthrenes. The procedure involved bis-cycloaddition to substituted furans or pyr- roles, followed by aromatization of the bis-adducts in various ways. The photochemistry of the crowded arenes was studied. It was found that the series of 9,lO-dialkoxyoctamethylan- thracenes, as well as 9-methoxyoctamethylanthracene, formed 9,10-Dewar-isomers on irradiation, but these were much less stable than the 9,10-Dewar-anthracenes produced from irradia- tion of decamethylanthracene and 9-t-butylanthracene. Ir- radiation of 1,2,3,A,5,6,7,8-octamethylanthracene at -78°C produced an unknown radical species as evidenced by its ESR spectrum. There is no precedent in the literature for such behavior. Mary Ann Babin Meador The synthesis of novel iptycenes from di-aryne equiva- lents was described. In l,“,5,8-tetrahydroanthracene-l,A55,8- bis(epoxide)(I), both double bonds are effective dienOphiles. Thus, I gives a bis-adduct with anthracene which on dehydra- tion gives 5,9,14,18-tetrahydro-5,18[l',2']:9,lA[l",2"]-di- benzenoheptacene(II). That is, I is a 2,336,7-anthradiyne equivalent. The central anthracene moiety in II adds benzyne to give the novel horseshoe-shaped 5,7,9,lA,l6,18-hexahydro- 5,18[l',2']:7,16[l",2"]:9,lu[l"',2"'J-tribenzenoheptacene. Similarly, 6,7—dibromo-l,A—dihydronaphthalene-l,A— epoxide(III) is a 2,3;6,7-naphthadiyne equivalent. Reaction of III with anthracene produces an adduct which on dehydra- tion gives 2,3-dibromo-6,ll-dihydro-6,ll[l',2'J-benzeno- naphthacene(IV). Reaction of IV with n-butyllithium and furan gives an adduct which can be deoxygenated with low valent titanium to give 5,1A-dihydro-5,lA—[l',2']-benzeno- pentacene. With Love, to Mike ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I wish to express my sincere gratitude to Professor Harold Hart for his encouragement and guidance throughout the course of this study, as well as his limitless patience through my bout with morning sickness. Appreciation is extended to Michigan State University, the National Science Foundation and the National Institute of Health for financial support in the form of teaching and research assistantships. I would like to thank my family and friends for their love and support over the past few years. I especi- ally owe my parents a debt I can never repay. Last and most, I thank my husband, Mike, for never allowing me to quit. iii Chapter LIST OF TABLES. TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES INTRODUCTION. RESULTS AND Part I. E. Part II. C. DISCUSSION. Synthesis and Reactivity of Sterically Crowded Anthracenes Preparation of Arenes Photochemistry. Unusual Behavior of l,2,3,4,5,6,7,8- Octamethylanthracene, QZ' . . . . . . Reactions of Anthracenes with Tri- fluoroacetic Acid . . . . Conclusions Synthesis of Some Novel Iptycenes Using Di-aryne Equivalents. Use of a 2,3;6,7-Anthradiyne Equivalent in Synthesis of a Novel Pentiptycene. Synthesis of a Triptycene From a 2,3;6,7-Naphthadiyne Equivalent Suggestions for Further Studies EXPERIMENTAL. General Procedures. 9,lO-Dimethoxyoctamethylanthracene, éfi- . . iv Page . viii ix 22 22 2A 37 us 50 56 58 59 65 69 75 75 75 Chapter Page Tetrabromohydroquinone, IAQ . . . . . . . . . . 76 2 ,3 5, 6- Tetrabromo- l, A- diethoxy- benzene, 79. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 77 9,lO-Diethoxyoctamethylanthracene, 1% 77 2,3,5,6-Tetrabromo-l,A-di- is0propoxybenzene, 7g . . . . . . . . . . . . . 78 9, 10- Diisopropoxyoctamethyl- anthracene, 7%. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 78 2,3,5,6-Tetrabromo-A-(bromomethyl)- anisole, I56. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 79 2 3, 5, 6- Tetrabromo- A- (acetoxymethyl)- anisole, IAZ. . . . . . . . . . . . . 79 2 3, 5, 6- Tetrabromo- A- (hydroxymethyl)- anisole, IAQ. . . . . . . . . . . 8O 2,3,5,6—Tetrabromoanisole, ZA . . . . . . . . . 8O 1,2,3,u,5,6,7,8-Octamethyl-9- methoxyanthracene, 18 . . . . . . . . . . . . . 81 1,2,3,A,5,6,7,8-Octamethyl-1,A,5,8- tetrahydroanthracene-1,A,5,8-bis- (epoxide), 77 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 82 1,5,9,10-Tetramethyl-1,A,5,8-tetra- hydroanthracene-1,A;5,8—bis(epoxide), g9 82 l,8,9,lO-Tetramethyl-l,A,5,8-tetra- hydroanthracene-1,A;5,8—bis(epoxide), 9,10-Diisopropoxy-l,A,5,8-tetrahydro- anthracene-1,A,5,8-bis(epoxide), 8% . . . . . . 83 Diethyl Diglycollate, lAg . . . . . . . . . . . 8A Diethyl 3,A-dihydroxyfuran-2,5— dicarboxylate, ISO. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8A Chapter Page Diethyl 3,A-dimethoxyfuran—2,5- dicarboxylate, 88%. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 85 3,A-Dimethoxyfuran—2,5-dicarboxylic acid, $86 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 85 3,A-Dimethoxyfuran, 8%. . . . . . . . . . . . . 86 2,3,6,7,9,lO-Hexamethoxy-1,A, 5,8- tetrahydroanthracene-l, A;5,8- bis- (epoxide), 88 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 87 6,7-Dibromo-5,8-dimethyl-l,A-di- hydronaphthalene-l,A-epoxide, 88. . . . . . . . 88 l,9,10—Trimethyl-1,A,5,8-tetrahydro- anthracene-1,A;5,8-bis(epoxide), 88 . . . . . . 88 9,lO-Dimethoxyanthracene, $5. . . . . . . . . . 89 1,2,3,A,5,6,7,8-Octamethylanthracene, fix. 0 o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o 90 1,8,9,IO-Tetramethylanthracene, 88. . . . . . . 9O 1,5,9,lO-Tetramethylanthracene, 89. . . . . . . 9O 9,lO-DiiSOprOpoxyanthracene, 98 . . . . . . . . 91 2,3,6,7,9,lO-Hexamethoxyanthracene, 9%. . . . . 91 2,3,6,7-Tetrahydroxyanthroquinone, 88%. . . . . 92 l,9,10-Trimethylanthracene, 92. . . . . . . . . 92 A,5-Dibromo-3,6-diiodoveratrole, 98 . . . . . . 93 9,lO-Dimethoxyoctamethyl-l,A,5,8- tetrahydrophenanthrene-l,A;5,8— bis(epoxide), 9x. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 93 9, 10- -Dimethoxyoctamethy1phen- anthrene, 98. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9A General Procedure for Photolysis of Anthracenes and Phenanthrenes . . . . . . . . . 95 Irradiation of 1,5, 9,lO-tetramethy1- anthracene, 89, in the Presence of Oxygen. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 95 vi Chapter Irradiation of 1,8,9,lO-tetramethyl— anthracene, 88, in the Presence of Oxygen. . . . . Reaction of Octamethylanthracene .81 with TFA. Reaction of 9-methoxyoctamethy1- anthracene 78 with TFA. Reaction of 9,lO-dimethoxyoctamethyl- anthracene 89 with TFA. 1, A 5, 8- -Tetrahydroanthracene- -1, A :,5 8— bis(epoxide), 1&8. Adduct of Anthracene and bis- epoxide 18% (181) Pentiptycene, 128 Attempted Reaction of Pentiptycene iiQ With 1,2,“,S—tetrabromobenzenes, , 19 and Ag Attempted Reaction of Pentiptycene 128 with Diaryne Precursor 838. Attempted Reaction of Pentiptycene .188 with Bis- epoxide 1&8 (anti) 6 ,7 Dibromo- 1, A- dihydronaphthalene- l ,A- epoxide, 13g. Adduct of 13% and Anthracene (I88). 3,A—Dibromo-[2b.l.1]triptycene, I88 Adduct of 135 and Furan (188) [3b.l.l]-Triptycene, 131- Bibliography. vii Page 96 96 97 97 98 99 100 101 101 102 102 103 103 10A 105 106 Table LIST OF TABLES Synthesis of 9,lO-dialkoxyoctamethylan— thracenes Using Di-aryne Equivalents. Bis-annelation Using Furans as Dienes. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Deoxygenation of Bis—adducts Using Low Valent Titanium . . . Spectroscopic Data for 9,10-Dewar— anthracenes . . . . . . . . . . . . viii Page 25 28 31 A1 Figure LIST OF FIGURES Page Other Dewar-anthracenes . . . . . . . . . . l9 Ultraviolet spectrum of 9,10-diethoxy- octamethylanthracene 1% (solid line) and its 9,10-Dewar-isomer 19% (broken line) at -A5°C in hexane. . . . . . . . . . A3 1H NMR spectra of products of the photolysis of l,A,9-trimethylanthracene, 188, in three different solvents: a) pyridine-d5; b) benzene-d6; c) chloro- form-d showing the region from 62 to 65 and d) the 13C NMR in chloroform-d. . . . . . . AA Methyl region from spectrum 3a, expanded to show five methyl peaks . . . . . . . . . A6 ESR spectrum of radical from the photolysis of octamethylanthracene, 81, in toluene at -lOO°C. . . . . . . . . . . . A8 a) ESR spectrum observed on addition of 1 eq trifluoroacetic acid (lM in CDCl3) to octamethylanthracene, 81, in CDCl 3 (mlO-BM); b) ESR spectrum produced in ix Figure Page 6 Cont. similar manner from 9-methoxyocta— methylanthracene, Z§. . . . . . . . . . . . 52 7 Endo-approach in Diels-Alder reaction between bis-epoxide lag and penti- ptycene lgfi . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 65 8 End on View of heptiptycene lgg . . . . . . 7O INTRODUCTION Benzynes have been used extensively in organic syn- thesis for many years.1 In comparison, investigation of the enormous potential of di-aryne equivalents for the construction of complex ring systems has only begun. Use of the terms di-aryne and di-benzyne does not necessarily imply that the reactions which will be discussed proceed through intermediates such as l and g. Dibenzynes, however, have been proposed as intermediates in certain mass spectral fragmentations, and have been used to rationalize products from the co-pyrolysis of pyromellitic (§) or mella- phanic (A) dianhydrides with benzene2 (see Scheme 1). These reactions may proceed as postulated, or they might proceed in a stepwise manner. Indeed, when a less active arene, such as chlorobenzene, is used as the trapping agent 3 products which still contain one anhydride ring are ob- served. Wittig3 introduced di-aryne equivalents in 1959 with the conversion of 5 to 1. The yield of 1 was low, however, Mg n-BuLi é §LM F F £l__;€, [liili £34915 ()015 Br Br THF Br 101 lm «a w [\l and 5 was a difficult starting material to prepare. Giles3 used a di-aryne equivalent to synthesize the bis-epoxide, l2. But the reaction was carried out in two steps since a higher reaction temperature was required for addition of the second furan moiety than for the first. The overall yield of bis—adduct kg for the two-step process was 36%. ONE \ 0M5 Br NaNHZPQ 3" 0 __.__. (so... Br THF, A 0M3 0M3 9. ~ °® HQNHZ , / MeOCH2CH20Me. v A. £0 OMe ” a (57 ‘70) 0Me IO M Wege and Stringer,5 in work reported after studies on di-arynes were initiated in this laboratory, synthesized some novel furan derivatives of triphenylene (i434, lé and $9) via o—di-aryne equivalents (see Scheme 2). The re— ported yields of the bis-adducts lg and l5 were low. How- ever, much unreacted starting material, as well as mono- adduct, was recovered in each case, since the authors stated that allowing the reactions to go to completion resulted in degradation of the products. Thus, the degree of conversion was actually much higher than the reported yield. An improved method of generating di—aryne equivalents has been developed by Hart and co-workers in recent years.6 The method makes use of the relatively easy-to-prepare tetrabromoarenes,such as ll. Reported yields for these 13 L8, (70%) reactions are generally good (60-80%), and the scope of the method is limited only by compatibility of the diene (and substituents on the dienophile) with n-butyllithium. Di-aryne equivalents have been shown to be particularly useful in the synthesis of fused aromatic systems.6'lo A wide range of substituted anthracenes have been syn- 6’8 in two steps from thesized by Hart and co-workers suitably substituted benzenes. The procedure involves bis- annelation of substituted furans or pyrroles, followed by ‘ aromatization in various ways. For example, the bis-epoXides, g9 or lg, can be prepared in good yield from ll or l2, and furan. Deoxygenation is carried out in a single step using R 8" D B? n-BULi MR 8 Br R 12 W43 20 R=Me (72%) - L? R=OMe l0 R=OMe (72°70) W06 or FeCls . n-BuLi R R 21 R= Me (56°70) g R: OMe (89°70) low valent metals such as tungsten or iron,8 as opposed to indirect procedures which involve two steps, hydrogenation followed by dehydration. Since the bis-annelation proceeds stepwise,6 the re- action can be used to make unsymmetric anthracenes. For example,tfluamono-adduct, gé, can be prepared from £1 and 2,5-dimethylfuran using one equivalent of n-butyllithium. Adding one equivalent each of N-methyltetramethylpyrrole and n-butyllithium to the reaction mixture gave the unsym- metric bis-adduct, 3%. Here, the choice of solvent was important. With ether or tetrahydrofuran as solvent no mono—adduct g3 could be isolated. This is probably because 3. 3 Bo . 9 Bf ,. leq n-BuLI TOLUENE g _,($ROMATIZE 25 the greater solubility of %% allows it to be metalated faster than tetrabromo—p-xylene, l1. If toluene is used as solvent, the solubility of ii is increased, giving a good yield of g%. Extension of this methodology to phenanthrenes has 9 been achieved by Hart and Shamouilian by using A,5-dibromo- 3,6-diiodo-o-xylene, gé, as the o-di-benzyne precursor. Br $3., This reagent was selected in order to direct lithiation to give the desired product (iodine exchanges faster than bromine). LeHoullier and GribblelO recently used a similar method for generating a naphthadiyne equivalent in the two—step synthesis of chrysenes, 3% and éA (see Scheme 3). The 2 , 6-dibromo-l , 5-bis-[(p-tolyl sulfonyl )oxy] naphthalene , g9 , was easily prepared in 9A% yield from commercially available @53- 10 OH 00 5" p~1oluenawlfonyl~CL Br ~ acetone. MOH»°° I OH 2.2 Scheme 3. ll Di-arynes can be trapped by anthracene to give some novel "iptycenes."* The pentiptycene, 3Q, was first pre- pared from triptycyne equivalent, 35, (not itself trivial 12 to make!) in a 10% yield. The overall yield of 3% from available starting materials was only 1.2% (5 steps). The di-t-butyl derivative, 3%, was synthesized from di-aryne precursor 31 in a 2% yield, along with some l,A- di-t-butyl-triptycene, gg.l3 *The name "iptycene" emphasizes the relationship between these compounds and the parent structure, triptycene. A prefix indicates the number of separated arene planes; thus, above is a triptycene (three planes) and 3g is a pent ptycene (five planes).ll 12 Br 333' Q] + Hart, Shamouilian and Takehirall have synthesized 36 in a much improved yield, and in only one step from avail- able starting materials. They also prepared the new 0- pentiptycene, Al, and l.l.2(b)b.l.l pentiptycene, A3 (see Scheme A). Di-arynes have been shown to be useful synthons for fused aromatic compounds containing large peri-substituents. Since the steric strain is introduced over two steps -- the first an exothermic benzyne reaction, and the second driven by aromatization -- the molecule is cajoled into accepting 6,7 1A it. For example, decamethylanthracene, A , was synthe— ’b 6 sized in 72% overall yield from TX and N,N-dimethylamino- tetramethylpyrrole, a substantial improvement over the Br B!“ r .EZ |80°C VACUUM eg (72%) earlier eight-step synthesis.lu Similarly, dodecamethyl- naphthacene, Al, was prepared from the naphthadiyne equiva- lent 36 in a 62% overall yield.6 15 Br 8. Br~ 3,, 33 g§(52°k» 180°C VACUUM 93 (99%) Compounds such as A5 undergo some unusual reactions as a consequence of the steric strain in the system. For ex- ample, decamethylanthracene, $5, in the presence of a trace 1A Ir- amount of acid, will isomerize to the tautomer Ag. radiation of A5 in benzene (or ether) produces the 9,10- Dewar-isomer Ag, which thermally reverts to the anthracene. Both of these rearrangements serve to buckle the middle ring, relieving the four methyl-methyl peri-interactions. l6 Other aromatic compounds containing sterically bulky substituents also undergo photochemical valence isomeriza- tion to their Dewar-isomers. The first example of such compounds was van Tamelen's l,2,A-tri-t-butylbenzene, 59.15 Again, the Dewar-isomer, 5i, thermally rearranges to the starting material. l7 Peri-di-t-butylnaphthalenes such as 5% also have been 16a photolyzed to afford hemi- Dewar-naphthalenes. Curi- ously, 5% gave the hemi-Dewar, 53a, as the sole isomer. hv \ I g2, ééc None of the hemi-Dewar—isomer 53b could be detected. _J_ 18 Some tri-t-butylnaphthalenes also yield hemi-naphtha- valenes under irradiation. For example, naphthalene 53 phOtOlyzes to hemi-naphthavalene 55 in 95% yield.16b 0 hr O; 54 55 ~ \/ Surprisingly, the 1,2,3,A-tetra-t-butylbenzene 56 is converted thermally to its Dewar-isomer, 51 which reverts to 56 photochemically.l7 This reversal in reactivity clearly indicates that the Dewar-benzene 5g is actually lower in energy than its very crowded, aromatic valence isomer, 56. COzCHg A 02CH3 C02CH3 hV 02CH3 57 19 9-t-Butylanthracene 5Q is the only other anthracene reported to photoisomerize to a 9,10-Dewar-anthracene, 59.18 Other Dewar-anthracenes have been synthesized through 03.» 0; \A , is as, Hz 19-22 chemical means, however. These are shown in Figure l. ' 00‘” ' a“; 6320 l Cl g .D Figure 1. Other Dewar-anthracenes. 20 Less crowded anthracenes, such as 6A, are known to photodimerize,23 but only if unsymmetrically substituted in the 9,10-positions. The reactions generally give the head-to-tail isomer, 65. The only exception is with R o m, \ RI 6,30 R=R’=H b R=Me, R: H c R=M¢O,R’..H d R=Me, R’= M30 anthracenes linked as in 66.26 Here, the only possible product is the head-to-head isomer 61 Qulfi 4‘ o 67 95. ~ 21 This thesis will deal, in part, with the synthesis of some other peri-strained anthracenes through di-aryne equivalents. In order to examine the conflict between steric bulk and aromatic character that is inherent in these hindered compounds, their photochemical valence isomerizations and other interesting reactions will be discussed. In addition, extension of bis-annelations to the syn- thesis of some other novel compounds, such as "iptycenes," will be described. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Part I. Synthesis and Reactivity of Sterically Crowded Anthracenes In both decamethylanthracene, £5, and 9-t-butylanthra- cene, 5%, the 9,lO-Dewar-isomers are photochemically ac- cessible most likely because steric bulk destabilizes the fully aromatic structure relative to its valence isomer. The question arises, then, of how much steric bulk is necessary to drive the reaction. It is clear that the anthracene system is more sensi- tive to steric strain than either naphthalenes or benzenes. A single 9-t-butyl group is enough to give rise to the 9,lO-Dewar-anthracene in the case of 5Q. The naphthalene sYStemrequires at least 1,8-di—t—butyl substitution, and, 22 23 permethylanthracene, A5, is photoisomerized very readily, whereas permethylnaphthalene, 6%, does not photoisomerize at all.27 These observations are not surprising since it is well- established that anthracenes are highly reactive in the 9,lO-positions. This is because the two, smaller, iso— lated aromatic rings in the product may have as much (or even more) aromatic stabilization as the reactant. Hence, less resonance energy is lost in going from an anthracene to its 9,lO-Dewar isomer than in the same reaction with naphthalene or benzene (benzene losing the most). Due to this relative ease of photoisomerization, it was of interest to further explore the photochemistry of other peri-substituted anthracenes. In this part, the syn- thesis of a variety of such compounds will be described and their photochemistry examined. 2A A. Preparation of Arenes The first compounds selected for study were a series of 9,lO-dialkoxyoctamethylanthracenes, 69, ll, and 13. These compounds should be nearly as crowded as decamethylanthracene, 66, but not as sensitive to acid. In addition, varying the R-group to change the degree of steric hindrance would be, synthetically, very simple. These compounds were synthesized as shown in Table 1, from the corresponding di—aryne equiva- lent and N,N-dimethylaminotetramethylpyrrole. In a typical procedure, 5 mmol of the di-aryne equivalent and 10 mmol of the pyrrole in 50 mL dry tetrahydrofuran were cooled to -78°C and stirred (under argon) as 12 mmol n-butyllithium in 30 mL hexane was added drOpwise over two hours. The mixture was allowed to come slowly to room temperature, 25 Table 1. Synthesis of 9,lO-dialkoxyoctamethylanthracenes Using Di—aryne Equivalents. eq) 23¢}? :+" 0 99 9.9. s reported no results with bis-epoxides. However, in view of the high toxicity of iron carbonyl complexes, it is tempting to say that the zinc-titanium tetrachloride pro- cedure is the method of choice for deoxygenating such com- pounds. Highly substituted phenanthrenes also possess a high degree of steric strain, especially if substituted in the A- and 5-positions.31 Thus it was thought that 9,lO- dimethoxyoctamethylphenanthrene, 66, and decamethyl- phenanthrene, 66, might undergo some photochemical valence isomerization. 35 0 ~ 0 “‘0 ’0 98 93 ~ The 9,lO-dimethoxy derivative, 26, was synthesized in two steps from di-aryne equivalent 26 and tetramethyl furan, 16, as shown in Scheme 5. Bis-adduct 21 could not be isolated, but the crude product was used directly for deoxygenation with low valent titanium. The overall yield for both steps was 20%. Decamethylphenanthrene, 26, was synthesized by Hart and Shamouilian,in a similar manner from di-aryne precursor 66 in A0% overall yield.9 36 n-BuLj !>_ Scheme 5 37 B. Photochemistry The photolysis of the arenes previously described was followed by NMR spectros00py. In a typical procedure, a solution of lO-l2 mg of the arene in 0.5 mL of benzene-d6 (or toluene—d8) was placed in a 5 mm NMR tube and flushed with nitrogen. Irradiation of the sample for 60-90 min- utes using a Hanovia A50 W medium pressure lamp with Pyrex filter was carried out by taping the sample tube directly to the cooling Jacket of the lamp. If low temperatures were required, the lamp and cooling Jacket along with the sample were emersed in a dry ice-is0propanol bath, and dry nitrogen was passed through the cooling Jacket. The series of 9,lO-dialkoxyoctamethylanthracenes,'66,- Z}, and 16, were found to undergo photochemical valence isomerization to the 9,lO-Dewar isomers, but these were 69 R= Me '29 R=Me N 7: R= 5+ '2', R“? 73 R = i-Pr‘ L03 R: 34’? 38 only stable at temperatures lower than -30°C. The most likely explanation for this decreased stability compared to decamethyl-9,lO-Dewar-anthracene, 62, is that while forma- tion of the Dewar isomers is a photochemically allowed concerted process, the thermal reversion must proceed through a diradical intermediate, i.e., 666. A structure such as 666 would be more stabilized by alkoxy groups than by methyl groups, as in decamethylanthracene, 66. Interestingly, the stability of these 9,lO-Dewar- anthracenes relative to their aromatic valence isomers does not increase with increasing size of the alkoxy groups. 39 9,lO-Dimethoxy-9,lO—Dewar-anthracene 166 reverts to 66 at -30°C with a half-life of approximately one hour. The diethoxy derivative, 161, rearranges to anthracene 11 at -50°C with a half-life of thirty minutes, and 9,lO-di- isopropoxyoctamethylanthracene 166 rapidly reverts to 16 above —60°C. This must be because steric hindrance is also a factor in the stability of the Dewar isomers. Torsional strain in the Dewar isomers increases along the series di- methoxyo Ago mmzz omH on mmzz ma spasm .mocoomsspcmupwzooloa.m pom mama Ofiaoomoppooom .: magma H2 .Edpuooqm :Hmpoo op oaompmcs oou osmowpnpcmummsomloa.mo .mhzumnooEop meow on» no cocamuno mums mpuooam .oomzl pm ocmxoc :fi Haoo >D|Lm3oa aunmsv CH commaouonq who: moHQEmmn .ooowl on 00:: um oohsmmme who: mpuooom .Oowwl pm moon mzz cm ca monocosaop Ca mocoompnpcm on» wcfiumaopono nouns oocfimpnom 2 «a: Ama .mv 2a.: mo.::a .mm.m:H Amm .mv o=.m .mm.mma .mm.:ma Ame .mv mm.m .zm.mma .os.mma mm.mm . Ame .mv ma.m .mo.:m .sm.zm .mm.ma Ame .mv mm.a E: msm .Ho.mH .mm.mH .zm.mH Ame .mv om.a o . Axmsxv p>p Amy wmzz umH Acv mmzz ma spasm .cmscfipcoo .z magma “3 Figure 2. Ultraviolet spectrum of 9,lO-diethoxyocta— methylanthracene (solid line) and its 9, lO-Dewar-isomer l (broken line) at -u5°C in hexane. uu ’ V '3 V k; a. V \’v V in i M b. V V V Figure 3. 1H NMR spectra of products of the photolysis of l,u,9-trimethylanthracene, lgg, in three dif— ferent solvents: a) pyridine-d ; b) benzene-d6; c) chloroform—d showing the region from NO REACTION LL‘l it is, is stabilized by the four additional methyl groups of @Z. D. Reactions of Anthracenes with Trifluoroacetic Acid Peri-strained anthracenes substituted with methyl groups in the 9- and/or lO-positions rearrange in acid to give stable hydrocarbon analogues of 9-anthrones.1u’3l4 For example, 1,8,9,lO-tetramethylanthracene, 6%, in the presence of acid, rearranges to ll5.3u The reactions of H'- 00 m 0‘ I l 51 strong acid with peri-strained anthracenes containing hydrogens or alkoxy groups in the 9,lO-positions is un- known. Octamethylanthracene, 61, with trifluoroacetic acid in chloroform, is very easily oxidized to its radical cation as evidenced by the ESR signal (see Figure 6a). Although some 507 peaks are predicted, no fine structure TFA (UiCk3 87 H N can be observed in its ESR spectrum even at -60°C. This radical cation, unlike the species produced photolytically, is very stable at room temperature, and on quenching with water gives back octamethylanthracene, 61. Again, 1,4,5,8-tetramethylanthracene, llg, under the same reaction conditions, exhibits no ESR signal. This behavior is simply due to a difference in oxidation po- tentials.35 The radical cation of anthracene itself can be produced by oxidation with thallium (III) trifluoro- acetate in trifluoroacetic acid.37 But there are only a few examples of anthracenes with a low enough oxidation b) Figure 6. 52 3494 a) ESR spectrum observed on addition of 1 eq trifluoroacetic acid (lM in CD013) to octa- methylanthracene, 61, in CDCl (mio-ZM); b) ESR spectrum produced in simi ar manner from 9-methoxyoctamethylanthracene, Z5. 53 TFA s N0 REACTION was potential to give rise to the radical cation in the presence of trifluoroacetic acid.38 0n addition of trifluoroacetic acid to a solution of 9-methoxyoctamethylanthracene 15 in chloroform, a weak ESR signal was obtained which appeared at the same position as that for octamethylanthracene, fix, giving evidence for formation of a radical cation (see Figure 6b). This signal decayed after several hours. On quenching with water and removing the solvent, a white solid was isolated, mp 2A5—2M8°C. The 1H NMR spectrum of this solid consisted of five singlets (62.28, 2.31, 2.35, 2.5M, 3.56) with an integration ratio of 3:3:3z3zl. The infrared spectrum 1 and 1655 cm"1 showed strong bands at 1670 cm” , and the mass spectrum had a strong molecular ion peak at m/e 306 and a base peak at m/e 291. All of the spectral data of the product are consistent with the octamethylanthrone llfi (lit.39 mp 251-25200). With 9,lO-dimethoxyoctamethylanthracene 6% in chloro— form, addition of trifluoroacetic acid caused the solution 54 to turn dark blue, suggesting the formation of a radical cation. But the color faded in an instant to pink, and no 0:: .35» cu I +259 55 ESR signal could be observed. Quenching with water and removal of the solvent gave a pink residue. Fractional re- crystallization of the residue with acetone gave two pro- ducts, both white crystalline solids, in a 3:2 ratio. The 1 H NMR of the minor product (119p), mp 290-292°C, consisted of five singlets (61.35, 1.94, 2.20, 2.49, 4.51) with an area ratio of 6:6:6:6:1. The infrared spectrum 1 and 3690 cm-1 had strong bands at 1680 cm' , and the highest mass peak in the mass spectrum (also the base peak!) was m/e 305 (M+-0H). These data suggest a struc- ture like that shown for 1196. The major product (119a), mp 278-280°C, showed no carbonyl bands or hydroxy groups in the infrared spectrum. The 1H NMR spectrum consisted of only two singlets (62.51, 2.28) in an integral ratio of 1:1. The 13C NMR spectrum showed three aliphatic peaks (616.90, 17.19, H9.15) and four aromatic peaks. The mass spectrum had a strong peak at m/e 320 and a base peak of m/e 305. In spite of the 56 simplicity of the spectral data, no good suggestions can be made at this time as to the structure of this product. Thus, it appears that both alkoxy and hydrogen sub- stitution in the 9,lO-positions give rise to radical cations in the presence of acid. The presence of alkoxy groups in these positions, however, leads to further re- action. E. Conclusions Although the success rate for designing anthracenes with photochemically accessible Dewar-isomers has not been very high, some conclusions can be drawn which may serve as a guide to future research. First, a large degree of steric strain is a factor, but there seems to be a balance between steric strain in the anthracene and that in the Dewar-isomer. For this reason, a compound such as 129 might be interesting. Although 120 should be IZO 57 somewhat sterically hindered, the corresponding 9,10—Dewar- isomer should be relatively strain-free, and therefore, stable. Second, 9,10-dialkoxy groups destabilize 9,10-Dewar- isomers relative to their corresponding anthracene valence isomers. However, alkoxy or other hetero—atom groups may not be a problem in other positions, as in compounds 12% and 122. l2| l2? In any case, it must be pointed out that many an- thracenes belong in a large gray area where they are too hindered to photodimerize, but not hindered enough to form a stable 9,10-Dewar-isomer. 58 Part II. Synthesis of Some Novel Iptycenes Usinngi- aryne Equivalents , Norbornene derivatives, such as l,A-dihydronaphthalene- l,A-epoxide, 93, are effective dienophilesflo’ul For ex- ample, Wittig showed that 93 reacts in high yield with anthracene andcnnkn'polynuclear aromatic compounds to give novel cycloadducts such as 123.40 The oxygen bridge 033 ‘w men? A 93 N N in 123 can be easily removed with hydrochloric acid in' acetic anhydride to produce 5,12-benzeno-5,l2-dihydro_ naphthacene, 1,25,. Thus, many interesting compounds can 59 be made in two steps from the readily available epoxide 23:- A. Use of a 2,3,6,7-Anthradiyne Equivalent in Synthesis of a Novel Pentiptycene 1,4,5,8-Tetrahydroanthracene-l,ug5,8—bis(epoxide) 125 can be synthesized from 1,2,4,5-tetrabromobenzene £8 and furan in 71% yield by a procedure similar to that described in Part I. The bis-epoxide 125 was isolated as a 50:50 mixture of syn- and anti-isomers. These could be separated by trituration with methanol (the syn-isomer is soluble and the anti-isomer is not). Bis-epoxide 125 should also react with a wide variety of dienes. And since the oxygen bridges in the resulting cycloadducts should be easily removed to give an aromatic product, 125 can be regarded as a synthetic equivalent of 2,3;6,7-anthradiyne 136. 60 IO 0] L23 Reaction of bis-epoxide 115 with two equivalents of anthracene in refluxing xylene gave the bis-adduct 111. Anti-115 gave one isomer of 111 (mp HHO°C, dec.), and syn- 115 gave another isomer of 111 (mp 395°C, dec.). The two isomers were identified by their NMR spectra. The ”0"” + 73% l25 ~J . (syn or onh) H H H H H0 “ow HHH I-IIIHHO l27 ~ proton NMR spectrum of the isomer from syn-115 showed three four-proton singlets for the three sets of bridge- head hydrogens (62.13, N.35, “.80), and a singlet for the two uncoupled aromatic hydrogens (66.90), as well as four 61 aromatic multiplets for the remaining sixteen aryl hydro- gens. The proton spectrum of the other isomer was almost identical. The 13C NMR spectrum for each isomer showed only eleven signals (three aliphatic carbons and eight aromatic carbons), as required by symmetry. The oxygen bridges were removed from either isomer of 111 with hydrochloric acid in acetic anhydride to give pentiptycene 118. Again its structure was apparent from its spectra. The proton spectrum of 118 showed a four- proton singlet for the bridgehead hydrogens (65.50) and two singlets, area ratio “:2, for the uncoupled protons of the central anthracene ring (67.81, 8.06), as well as two multiplets for the remaining sixteen aryl protons. The 13C NMR spectrum of 118 showed only eight signals as re- quired by symmetry. The ultraviolet spectrum of 118 in acetonitrile contained a wealth of absorption bands as a consequence of the central anthracene moiety, the longest 62 wavelength absorption appearing at 371 nm. Reaction of pentiptycene 118 with o-benzyne (generated from o-benzenediazonium carboxylate) gave adduct 119.u2 The structure was assigned from the method of synthesis and from the spectral data. Attempts to react pentiptycene 118 with any di-aryne equivalents failed. With tetrabromobenzenes, 11, 19 and fig, the pentiptycene was recovered quantitatively. Ap- parently, the temperatures at which these n-butyllithium reactions must be run (-u0°C to 0°C), were not high enough to allow the reaction to take place. 63 '28 + BUU —> NO REACTION N I28 + BUU > NO REACTION L. B L' |28 + Br " U' e7 N0 REACTION ,\J‘ I3? 4.8 Pentiptycene 118 was also reacted with bis-triazole $89, a new di-aryne equivalent developed by Hart and OK.43 N Pb(OAO '33 + @an )4» N0 REACTION I 6A Again, all of the pentiptycene 118 was recovered, along with a white polymer thought to have structure 111. This polymer is obtained if the bis-triazole is oxidized by lead (IV) lI/D I\ L\¢;7 N “3 tetraacetate in the absence of diene. The 2,3,6,7-anthradiyne equivalent, bis-adduct 118, was heated in refluxing xylene with pentiptycene 118. Even after four days, no product was formed. Here, the oxygen 3 4 DAYS > NO REACTION '33 + ' O“ XYLENE,A' onti- I25 N bridges in 118 may have a role in preventing the reaction. In the least hindered endo-approach, shown in Figure 7, there would still be a substantial non-bonding interaction between an oxygen bridge and one of the outer phenyl rings. 65 Figure 7. Endo-approach in Diels-Alder reaction between bis-epoxide 118 and pentiptycene 118. B. Synthesis of a Triptycene From a 2,336,7-Naphthadiyne Equivalent 6,7-Dibromo-l,A—dihydronaphthalene-l,A-epoxide, 111, synthesized from 1,2,4,5-tetrabromobenzene, 18, and furan using one equivalent of n-butyllithium, should also be an effective dienophile. Again, the oxygen bridge in the resulting cycloadducts should be easily removed to give an aromatic structure. And, since 111 is functionalized 66 leq Br Br n-BuLi A Br Br 6:0 \ 99 with bromines, it can be regarded as a synthetic equiva- lent of 2,3;6,7-naphthadiyne l%%. 00‘ '33 N Reaction of epoxide lég with one equivalent of anthra- cene in refluxing xylene gave the adduct lég (mp 265-266°C) .,. cos B 0‘.” XYLENE , A; |32 r~_/ in 96% yield. The adduct was identified by its spectra. The proton NMR spectrum of l§g showed three two-proton 67 singlets for the three sets of aliphatic hydrogens(52.09, “.26, n.7u), as well as aromatic peaks for the remaining ten aryl hydrogens. The 130 NMR showed three aliphatic carbons and nine aromatic carbons, a total of twelve peaks as required by symmetry. The mass spectrum gave a molecular ion peak of m/e 480. Adduct l§g was dehydrated with hydrochloric acid in acetic anhydride to give the dibromotriptycene lié. Again, 1 the structure was apparent from the spectra. The H NMR HI. :34 C’ACZ‘); 3" spectrum of l§§ showed a two-proton singlet (65.50) for the bridgehead hydrogens, two two-proton singlets for the uncoupled hydrogens of the naphthalene ring (67.60, 7.93), and two aromatic multiplets for the remaining eight aryl protons. The 130 NMR showed only seven peaks. Two peaks due to quaternary carbons were missing because of the low solubility of the compound. Reaction of lég with furan using n-butyllithium to generate the aryne, was carried out in the manner described 68 for the dibenzyne reactions in Part I. As before, the structure of adduct lag was apparent from its spectral data. The 1H NMR of léé contained two two-proton singlets for the four bridgehead hydrogens (65.“8, 5.72), and three two-proton singlets (66.88, 7.65, 7.76) for the three sets 2 hydrogens, as well as two aromatic mul— of uncoupled sp tiplets for the remaining eight hydrogens. The 13C NMR was simpler than predicted by symmetry, only eleven peaks, because of coincidental overlap of some of the aromatic peaks. The mass spectrum gave a molecular ion peak of m/e 370. Deoxygenation of adduct léé was carried out using low valent titanium in the same manner as described in Part I. The novel triptycene til (mp 22l-222°C) was isolated in 79% yield. The spectral data are in agreement with the 1 structure shown. The H NMR spectrum of til consisted of a two-proton singlet (65.53) for the two bridgehead 69 'TKH .Zn l36 4) ~ THF, A w hydrogens, and two two—proton aromatic singlets for the two sets of uncoupled hydrogens of the anthracene moiety (67.87, 8.22), as well as four multiplets for the twelve remaining aromatic hydrogens. The 130 NMR contained eleven peaks (one aliphatic, ten aromatic carbons) as required by symmetry. The mass spectrum gave a strong molecular ion peak at m/e 354. C. Suggestions for Further Studies Iptycenes are an intriguing class of compounds because they possess a high degree of symmetry, and they comprise planar aromatic systems in well-defined orientations to one another.uu’l45 Heptiptycene lgg has a geometry with several interest- ing structural features (see Figure 8). Four of the aryl .rings are arranged in a horseshoe shape which creates a non-polar or lipophilic cavity with two parallel arene rings separated by approximately 8.2 A. This cavity might 7O Figure 8. End on view of heptiptycene lgg. trap non—polar small molecules (especially if the three remaining rings were to carry polar, hydrophilic substi- tuents), or may yield novel organometallic complexes. Also, with two additional arene rings, this cavity would be converted to three-dimensional hexagonal array of benzenoid rings. Pentiptycene kég and triptycene £17 supply easy entry into higher iptycene analogues since both contain an anthracene ring which can undergo Diels-Alder reactions with suitable dienophiles. If pentiptycene lgg, for ex- ample,.could react with a di-benzyne equivalent, the trideciptycene lQQ would be produced. Here, five aryl rings on each side of the molecule are arranged so that 71 00 IS? Q only one more arene ring would be needed to form a cyclic array. So far, as previously discussed, all attempts to react pentiptycene lgfi with a di-benzyne equivalent have failed. 72 K) a) W 2 '93 Triptycene lél with a di-benzyne equivalent may yield two isomers of noniptycene, $82 and %£Q’ one of which would possess the same arrangement of five aryl rings. Finally, since pentiptycene lgg reacts with benzyne generated with o-benzenediazonium carboxylate to give heptiptycene lgg, it should react in the same way with a derivative of o—benzenediazonium carboxylate, such as lfil.u6 This would give dibromoheptiptycene lgg, which could react further with anthracene or triptycene l§z and n-butyllithium to yield the novel iptycenes, lag and lgg, respectively (see Scheme 6). 73 I37 > N EXPERIMENTAL General Procedures NMR spectra (1H and 13C) were recorded on either a Bruker WM 250 MHz or a Varian T-6O Nuclear Magnetic Reson- ance Spectrometer using tetramethylsilane (TMS) as the in- ternal standard. ESR spectra were measured with a Varian E-u EPR Spectrometer. IR spectra were recorded on a Perkin-Elmer Model 167 spectrometer. Mass spectra were measured at 70 eV by Mr. Ernest Oliver using a Finnigan AOOO spectrometer with the INCOS data system. Ultraviolet absorption spectra were recorded on a Varian Carey 219 spectrometer. Melting points were determined using a MEL- TEMP apparatus, modified when necessary for high tempera- tures, and are uncorrected. Anhydrous magnesium sulfate was used as the drying agent throughout, and the silica gel for chromatography was 230-hOO mesh. Analyses were performed by either Spang Microanalytical Laboratory, Eagle Harbor, Michigan or Guelph Chemical Laboratories, Ltd., Guelph, Ontario, Canada. 9,lO-Dimethoxyoctamethylanthracene,_69 28 To a solution of tetrabromo-p-dimethoxybenzene, lg, (2.27 g, 5.0 mmol) and N,N-dimethylaminotetramethylpyrrole28 75 76 (2 g, excess) in 50 mL tetrahydrofuran under argon at -78°C was added n-butyllithium (12 mmol in 25 mL hexane) dropwise over two hours. The reaction was allowed to come slowly to room temperature, then 1 mL methanol was added, followed by 50 mL water. The product was extracted into methylene chloride, washed with water, dried, and the sol- vent removed. A waxy, yellow solid remained, which was heated under vacuum at 180°C for thirty minutes. The black residue produced was eluted through 8 cm florisil with 1:1 chloro- form-hexane, and recrystallized from ether-methanol to give 1.05 g (60%) bright yellow crystals, mp 216-218°C (lit.28 218-22000). lH-NMH (CD013): 52.38 (s, 12 H), 2.76 (s, 12 H), 3.33 (s, 6 H). Mass spectrum m/g 350 (M+), 335 (base peak). Tetrabromohydroquinone,_1Q5. Bromine (64 mL, 1.2 mol) was added drOpwise to a solu- tion of hydroquinone (24.2 g, 0.2 mol) in 200 mL acetic acid cooled in an ice bath. .The dark orange solution was left stirring overnight after which it was light orange and contained much white precipitate. A saturated sodium bisulfite solution was added until the reaction mixture was colorless, and 65 g (76%) white crystals collected, mp 2M2-2AA°C (lit.u8 2AAOC). Mass spectrum m/g M26 (M+ and base peak). 77 A2,3,5,6-Tetrabromo-l,flediethoxybenzene,A70 Ethyl bromide (5 mL, excess) was added all at once to a solution of 145 (10.65 g, 0.25 mol) and potassium hydroxide (2.8 g) in 30 mL methanol. The resulting solution was re— fluxed for twenty hours. Then the solvent was removed, and the residue was taken up in ether (100 mL) and 0.5 N sodium hydroxide, 0.1 N hydrochloric acid, and brine, and dried. Removal of the solvent left a tan solid which was recrystallized from methanol to give 7.2 g (60%) white needles, mp 150-151°C. Mass spectrum m/g (relative in- l tensity) 482 (13), 454 (7), 426 (100), 131 (87). H NMR (CDC13): 61.45 (t, 6 Hz, 6 H), 4.00 (q, 6 Hz, 4 H). 9,lO-Diethoxyoctamethylanthracene, 71 Synthesis was carried out analogous to 69 from 10 (2.4 g, 5 mmol) and N,N-dimethylaminotetramethylpyrrole28 (2 g). Recrystallization of the crude product from methanol- water gave 0.95 g (50%) bright yellow needles, mp l7l-l72°C. 1H NMR (toluene-d8): 61.26 (t, 7 Hz, 6 H), 2.32 (s, 12 H), 3.07 (s, 12 H), 3.48 (q, 7 Hz, 4 H). Mass spectrum m/g (relative intensity) 378 (33), 349 (60), 321 (100), 305 (10), 290 (10), 235 (9), 161 (12). 523;: Calcd for C26H3402: C, 82.46; H, 9.05. Found: C, 82.45; H, 9.09. Winn-3*-ml. 78 2,3,5,6-Tetrabromo-l,4-diisoprgpoxybenzene,_72 To a solution of 145 (21.3 g, 0.05 mol) and potassium hydroxide (5.61 g, 0.10 mol) in 75 mL methanol was added all at once isopropyl iodide (20.4 g, 0.12 mol). The brown reaction mixture was refluxed for forty hours after which the solvent was removed. The residue was taken up in ether (100 mL) and 0.5 N sodium hydroxide (50 mL). The organic layer was washed successively with 0.5 N sodium hydroxide, 0.1 N hydrochloric acid, and brine, and dried. Evaporation of the solvent gave a dark brown solid which was eluted through 8 cm florisil with 1:1 chloro- form-hexanes. The resulting orange solid was recrystal- lized from methanol to give 10.4 g (41%) pale yellow needles, mp 104-10500. 1H NMR (00013): 51.40 (d, 6 Hz, 12 H), 4.75 (sept, 6 Hz, 2 H). Mass spectrum m/e 510 (M+), 43 (base peak). 9,lO—Diisopropoxyoctamethylanthracene, 73 Synthesis was carried out analogous to 62 from 72 (2.55 g, 5.0 mmol) and N,N-dimethylaminotetramethylpyrrole28 (2 g). Recrystallization of the crude product from ace- tone gave l.2 g (60%) small, yellow crystals, mp 218-219°C. 1H NMR (toluene-d8): 51.08 (d, 6 Hz, 12 H), 2.47 (s, 12 H), 3.19 (s, 12 H), 4.12 (sept, 6 Hz, 2 H); 13c NMR (00013): 517.1, 21.0, 22.0, 75.4, 127.7, 127.9, 133.6, 151.4. Mass 79 spectrum: m/e (relative intensity) 406 (8), 363 (5), 321 (100), 305 (7), “3 (50)- Anal. Calcd for C28H38O2: C, 82.71; H, 9.42. Found: C, 82.76; H, 9.46. 2,3,5,6-Tetrabromo-4-(bromomethy1)anisole, 146 A solution of methyl tetrabromo-p-cresolatel49 (21.9 g, 0.05 mol) and bromine (16 g, 0.1 mol) in 1000 mL carbon tetrachloride was irradiated with a high intensity lamp, and refluxed for three hours. The solution was allowed to cool, washed with dilute sodium bisulfite, and the sol- vent removed. The off-white crystals remaining were re- crystallized from ethanol to give 25.6 g (99+%) white needles, mp 162-164°C. l H NMR (CDClB): 63.8 (S, 3 H), 4.8 (s, 2 H). Mass spectrum: m/e (relative intensity) 514 (l), “36 (65), 315 (21), 234 (30), 153 (40), 85 (37): 74 (100). 2,3,5,6-Tetrabromo-4-(acetoxymethyl)anisole,141 To a solution of 146 (20.4 g, 0.04 mol) in 150 mL acetic anhydride was added potassium acetate (2 g). The reaction mixture was refluxed three hours, allowed to cool, then poured into an ice-2N sodium hydroxide mixture. The light brown precipitate which formed was filtered, and dissolved in methylene chloride (100 mL). The solution was 80 washed with dilute sodium bicarbonate, water, then dried. Removal of the solvent left a sandy solid which was re- crystallized from methanol to give 19.7 g (99+%) white needles, mp 124-125°C. l H NMR (00013): 52.1 (s, 3 H), 3.85 (s, 3 H), 5.55 (s, 2 H). Mass spectrum: m/g_(re1a- tive intensity) no M+, 437 (1), 415 (1), 375 (7), 357 (1), 74 (5), 43 (100). 253,536-Tetrabromo-4-(hydroxymethyl)anisole,_148 g To a solution of 141 (20 g, 0.04 mol) in 150 mL ethanol was added 200 mL lN potassium hydroxide. The solution was refluxed for four hours, then cooled in an ice bath. The white crystals which formed were collected by vacuum filtra- tion and recrystallized from acetone to yield 16.7 g (92%) white needles, mp 172-17300. 1H NMR (00013): 52.2 (br s, 1 H), 3.8 (s, 3 H), 5.15 (s, 2 H). Mass spectrum m/g (relative intensity) 454 (56), 373 (44), 330 (38), 266 (100), 223 (34), 141 (32), 74 (29). 2,3,5,6-Tetrabromoanisole,74 50 A solution of tetra-n—butylammonium permanganate (4.80 g, 13 mmol) in 50 mL pyridine under argon was added to 148 (4.54 g, 10 mmol) in 50 mL pyridine at room tempera- ture. The resulting purple solution was heated to 40-50°C for six hours (solution turned brown). The reaction 81 mixture was cooled to room temperature and poured into dilute hydrochloric acid containing some sodium bisulfite. The white precipitate which formed was filtered and recrystal- lized from methanol to give 2.9 g (70%) small, white needles, mp 122-12400 (lit.51 120.500). 1 H NMR (CDC13): 63.85 (s, 3 H), 7.7 (s, l H). Mass spectrum m/g (relative in- tensity) 424 (56), 409 (10), 381 (23), 328 (14), 221 (30), 81 (42), 61 (100). 1,2,3L4,5,6,7,8-Octamethyl-9-methoxyanthracene, 75 Synthesis was carried out analogous to 69 from 74 (2.17 g, 5 mmol) and N,N-dimethylaminotetramethylpyrrole28 (2 g). The crude product was eluted through 10 cm silica gel with 10:1 hexane-chloroform then recrystallized from acetone-ether to give 0.2 g (20%) bright yellow crystals, mp 234—23500. l H NMR (toluene-d8): 62.33 (s, 6 H), 2.36 (s, 6 H), 2.72 (s, 6 H), 3.04 (s, 6 H), 3.40 (s, 3 H), 8.58 (s, 1 H); 130 NMR (00013): 515.92, 17.57, 17.73, 19.33, 62.22, 114.36, 124.57, 127.72, 128.11, 131.17, 132.11, 133.78, 155.36. Mass spectrum m/g (relative in- tensity) 320 (80), 305 (100), 41 (100). Anal. Calcd for C23H280: C, 86.20; H, 8.81. Found: C, 86.17; H, 8.66. 82 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8-Octamethyl-l,4,5,8-tetrahydroanthracene- 1,4;5,8-bis(§poxide)i_lz A solution of n-butyllithium (22 mmol) in 50 mL hexane was added dropwise over three hours to 1,2,4,5-tetrabromo- benzene, 40,52 (3.9 g, 10 mmol) and tetramethylfuran, 76,49 (3 g) dissolved in 50 mL dry toluene under argon at -78°C. The reaction mixture was allowed to come slowly to room temperature, then 1 mL methanol was added. The organic layer was washed with water, dried, and the sol- vent removed. A waxy, yellow solid remained which was recrystallized from methanol to give 2 g (71%) small, pale yellow crystals, mp 290—296°c. 1 H NMR (CDC13): 61.60 (s, 12 H), 1.78 (s, 12 H), 6.82 (s, 2 H). Mass spectrum m/e (relative intensity) 322 (14), 268 (2), 236 (10), 225 (100). 1,5,9,lO—Tetramethyl-l,4,5,8-tetrahydroanthracene-1,4;5,8- bis(epoxide), 80 To a solution of tetrabromo-p—xylene 11,53 (8.44 g, 20 mmol) and 2-methylfuran, 78, (4.1 g, 50 mmol) in 200 mL dry toluene under argon at -23°C was added n-butyllithium (45 mmol in 100 mL hexane) dropwise over three hours. The reaction mixture was allowed to come slowly to room temperature and stirred overnight. Methanol (1 mL) was added, and the mixture was washed with water, dried, and 5.. .5 LE 7" 83 the solvent removed. The yellow waxy solid remaining was recrystallized with methanol to give 1.8 g (34%) off-white crystals, mp 248-252°C. l H NMR (00013): 51.98 (s, 6 H), 2.25 (s, 6 H), 5.50 (d, 2 Hz, 2 H), 6.85 (br s, 2 H), 6.95 (br d, 2 Hz, 2 H). Mass spectrum m/g (relative intensity) 266 (25), 240 (12), 223 (43), 197 (100), 181 (69), 165 (43), 152 (23), 43 (95). 1,8,9,10-Tetramethyl-l,4,5,8-tetrahydroanthracene—l,4;5,8- bis(epoxide)m 7% After filtering the off-white crystals from the above, the mother liquor was evaporated to a yellow oil. Re- crystallization from hexane gave 1.5 g (28%) white crys- tals, mp 174-180°C. l H NMR (CDC13) showed this to be a 3:2 mixture of syn and anti isomers. Major isomer: 62.10 (s, 6 H), 2.30 (s, 3 H), 2.38 (s, 3 H), 5.65 (m, 2 H); 6.8-7.1 (m, 4 H); minor isomer: 62.10 (s, 6 H), 2.40 (s, 3 H), 2.45 (s, 3 H), 5.65 (m, 2 H), 6.8;7.1 (m, 4 H). Mass spectrum: g/g (relative intensity) 266 (19), 240 (13), 223 (23), 197 (46), 181 (37), 165 (27), 152 (15), 85 (26), 43 (100). 9,lO-Diisopropoxy-l,4,5,8—tetrahydroanthracene-l,4;5,8- bis(epoxide), 82 To a solution of 1,4-diisopropoxytetrabromobenzene, 72, (2.55 g, 5 mmol) and furan, 81,(l g) in 50 mL dry toluene 84 at -78°C under argon was added dropwise over two hours n-butyllithium (12 mmol in 30 mL hexane). The reaction mixture was allowed to come slowly to room temperature at which time 1 mL methanol was added. The mixture was washed with water, dried, and the solvent removed. The yellow 1 oil remaining was recrystallized from hexane to give 0.45 L g (60%) white crystals, mp 184-188°C. H NMR shows it to s- ‘4 be a 1:1 mixture of syn and anti isomers which could not ..__ _ be separated: 61.3 (dd, 7 Hz, 12 H), 4.2 (br sept, 7 Hz, L. 2 H), 5.8 (s, 4 H), 7.1 (s, 4 H). Mass spectrum m/g (relative intensity) 326 (21), 213 (15), 186 (100), 121 (27); 43 (48). Diethyl Diglycollate,13231 A solution of diglycollic acid (60.0 g, 0.045 mol) in 250 mL ethanol was treated with ten drops of concentrated sulfuric acid, and refluxed overnight. After removing the solvent, the oily residue was distilled under vacuum (97- 100°C, 0.7 Torr) to give 70.3 g (83%) of a clear, viscous 1 liquid. H NMR (CD013): 51.30 (t, 7 Hz, 6 H), 4.23 (q, 7 Hz, 4 H), 4.23 (s, 4 H). Diethyl 3,4-dihydroxyfuran—2,5-dicarboxy1ate,159 To a freshly prepared solution of sodium ethoxide in ethanol (11.5 g sodium metal in 200 mL ethanol) was added 85 diethyl oxalate (17.5 g, 0.12 mol) and 149 (19.0 g, 0.10 mol). The solution was stirred at room temperature for two hours, then cooled in an ice bath. Neutralization with 2N hydrochloric acid gave 14 g (57%) white crystals, mp 185-600 (lit.5“ 186°C). Diethyl 3,4-dimethoxyfuran-2,5-dicarboxy1ate, 151 To a solution of 150 (19.6 g, 0.14 mol) in 100 mL acetone was added 28.0 g potassium carbonate and 30.4 g dimethyl sulfate. The mixture was refluxed with stirring for two hours, after which additional dimethyl sulfate (8 g) was added. Reflux was continued for fifteen more hours, then the hot solution was filtered. After remov- ing the acetone from the filtrate, the remaining oil was cooled in an ice bath. Dilute ammonium hydroxide was added with stirring until a white, waxy precipitate formed. Fil- tration and recrystallization from hexane gave 18.4 g (85%) white needles, mp 82-84°C (lit.5u 88-89°C). Mass spectrum; 2/3 272 (M+ and base peak). 3,4-Dimethoxyfuran-255-dicarb0xy11c acid,15§ To a solution of 151 (27.2 g, 0.1 mol) in 27 mL diox- ane was added 60 mL 1N sodium hydroxide. After five hours of reflux the solution was cooled, and acidified with di- lute hydrochloric acid. White crystals (19.9 g, 92%) 86 formed which were filtered and washed with water, mp 250°C (dec) (lit.514 255-7°C, dec). 3,4-Dimethoxyfuran,§3 Five separate reactions were set up as follows: copper (II) acetate (0.1 g) and powdered c0pper (2 g) were added to a solution of 152 (10 g, 0.046 mol) in 100 mL freshly distilled quinoline. The mixture was heated at 170°C for thirty minutes. The five reaction mixtures were combined for vacuum distillation. At 110°C and 0.7 Torr, the first 200 mL were collected (no product was present in later fractions), and added to 200 mL ether. The organic solution was ex- tracted five times with 50 mL portions of 2N sulfuric acid (cooled in an ice bath!!), two times with dilute sodium bicarbonate, then with water, and dried. The ether was removed and the remaining yellow liquid was distilled. The first fraction (61-2°C, 0.7 Torr) contained 15.0 g pure 83. The second fraction (110°C, 0.7 Torr), a 1:1 mixture of quinoline and 83, was redissolved in ether, extracted again, and redistilled to give an additional 5.0 g 53. The total yield was 20.0 g (68%) (iit.55 64%). 1H NMR (00013): 53.70 (s, 6 H), 6.90 (s, 2 H). 87 2,3,6,7,9,10-Hexamethoxy-l,4,5,8-tetrahydroanthracene- 1,“;5,8-bis(epoxide), 84 To a stirred solution of tetrabromo-p-dimethoxybenzene 28 (4.54 g, 10 mmol) and 83 (2.8 g, 22 mmol) in 100 mL 12: dry toluene at -78°C under argon was added n-butyllithium (12 mmol in 30 mL hexane) dropwise over two hours. The reaction mixture was allowed to come slowly to room tem- perature after addition. Methanol (1 mL) was added, and the mixture was washed with water, dried, and the solvent removed. The remaining brown oil was treated with hexane to give 2.4 g (65%) small, white crystals, mp 140-155°C (a 1:1 mixture of nyn and nn£;_isomers). Washing the solid with methanol dissolved the nyn isomer. The nnni isomer was collected by vacuum filtration as small, white crystals, mp 220—222°C (dec). Removal of the methanol left an off- white oily solid (90% enriched sample of nyn isomer)which could not be further purified. 1H NMR (00013) (£221)= 63.65 (s, 12 H), 3.80 (s, 6 H), 5.4 (s, 4 H); (EX2)‘ 53.70 (s, 12 H), 3.75 (s, 6 H), 5.4 (s, 4 H); 130 NMR (CDC13) (£221)= 558.97, 60.76, 80.20, 139.31, 143.34, 145.69. Mass spectrum n/g (relative intensity)390 (99), 375 (17), 347 (29), 301 (30), 287 (38), 273 (43), 257 (49), 245 (21), 45 (33). 88 6,7-Dibromo-5,8-dimethyl-l,4-dihydronaphthalene-l,4- epoxide, 85 To a solution of tetrabromo-p-xylene, %1,49 (4.2 g, 10 mmol) and furan (3 mL) in 100 mL dry toluene under argon at -23°C was added n-butyllithium (14 mmol in 40 mL hexane) over two hours. The reaction mixture was allowed to come slowly to room temperature and stirred overnight. Methanol (1 mL) was added, and the mixture was washed with water, dried, and the solvent removed. The off-white solid was recrystallized from hexane, then methanol to give 1.6 g (50%) small white crystals, mp l40-142°C. l H NMR (CDC13): 62.4 (s, 6 H), 5.7 (br s, 2 H), 6.95 (br s, 2H). Mass spectrum n/g (relative intensity) 330 (10), 304 (18), 221 (100), 141 (78), 115 (75)- 1,9,10-Trimethyl-l,4,5,8-tetrahydroanthracene-l,4;5,8- bis(epoxide), 86 To a solution of 45 (1.65 g, 5 mmol) and 2—methylfuran (2 g, excess) in 50 mL dry toluene at -78°C under argon was added n-butyllithium (5 mmol in 20 mL hexane) dropwise over two hours. The reaction was allowed to come slowly to room temperature, and methanol (1 mL) was added. The mixture was washed with water, dried, and the solvent removed. The waxy yellow solid remaining (1 g, 80%) was a mixture Of syn and anti isomers. Treatment with hexane gave one 89 isomer (nyn ?) preferentially as small, off-white crystals, mp 190-195°C. Removal of the hexane left a yellow oil (90% enriched sample of other isomer) which could not be further purified. 1H NMR of crystalline isomer (CD013): 61.90 (s, 3 H), 2.18 (S, 3 H), 2.21 (S, 3 H), 5.60 (br s, 3 H), 6.95 (br s, 4 H). Mass spectrum n/e (relative intensity) 252 (29), 226 (13), 209 (16), 197 (41), 181 (100), 165 (59), 152 (23), 43 (l4). 9,lO-Dimethoxyanthracene, 22 To a suspension of 1 mL titanium tetrachloride in 50 mL dry tetrahydrofuran under argon at 0°C was added 1.4 g zinc powder (excess). The steel gray suspension was heated to reflux, and a solution of bis-epoxide 4Qu9 (212-2221 mixture) (0.27 g, 1.0 mmol) in 50 mL tetrahydrofuran was added dropwise (15 minutes). The mixture was refluxed for eight hours, then cooled to room temperature, and poured into dilute hydrochloric acid. The resulting purple mixture was extracted with methylene chloride, and the organic layer was washed with water, and dried. The remaining yellow solid was recrystallized from chloroform to give 0.21 g 1H (90%) yellow plates, mp 198-199°C (lit.56 202°C). NMR (00013): 54.05 (s, 6 H), 7.30 (m, 8 H), 8.10 (m, 4 H). 90 l,2,3,4,5,6,7,8-Octamethylanthracene, 81 Deoxygenation of 11 was carried out in the same manner and scale as 18' The crude product was recrystallized from chloroform - hexane to give 0.25 g (80%) small yellow crystals, mp 292—29400 (lit.39 299-30000). l H NMR (tol- uene-d8): 62.30 (s, 12 H), 2.71 (s, 12 H), 8.83 (s, 2 H). Mass spectrum n/g (relative intensity) 290 (100), 275 (9). 1,8,9,10-Tetramethylanthracene,_8,857 Deoxygenation of 19 was carried out in the same manner and scale as 44, except the reaction was worked up in the dark. Removal of the solvent left a yellow oil which was recrystallized from methanol-ether to give 135 mg (57%) yellow flakes, mp 80-82°C. l H NMR (toluene-d8): 62.66 (s, 6 H), 2.71 (s, 3 H), 2.79 (s, 3 H), 7.16-7.25 (m, 4 H), 8.02 (d, 2 H). Mass spectrum n/n (relative intensity) 234 (97), 219 (100), 202 (29), 189 (14), 101 (29), 94 (16). l,5,9,lO-Tetramethylanthracene,_89 Deoxygenation of 89 was carried out in the same manner and scale as 42, except the reaction was worked up in the dark. The crude product was recrystallized from methanol 1 to give 0.20 g (85%) yellow needles, mp 71-72°C. H NMR (toluene—d8): 62.65 (s, 6 H), 2.87 (s, 6 H), 7.14-7.24 91 (m, 4 H), 8.01 (d, 9 Hz, 2 H). Mass spectrum n/g (relative intensity) 234 (100), 219 (62), 202 (16), 108 (28). Anal. Calcd for C18H18: C, 92.26; H, 7.74. Found: C, 92.17; H, 7.84. 9,lO-Diisopropoxyanthracene,94 Deoxygenation of 8% was carried out in the same manner and scale as 44. The crude product was recrystallized from methanol to give 0.26 g (88%) yellow needles, mp 122-124°C. 1H NMR (toluene-d8): 51.29 (d, 6.1 Hz, 12 H), 4.49 (sept. 6.1 Hz, 2 H), 7.35 (m, 2.5 Hz, 4 H), 8.45 (m, 2.5 Hz, 4 H). Mass spectrum m/e (relative intensity) 294 (15), 252 (2), 209 (100), 180 (8), 152 (15), 43 (15). 2,3,6,7,9,10-Hexamethoxyanthracene, 94 Deoxygenation of 44 was carried out in the same manner and scale as 44. Removal of the solvent left 0.31 g (85%) of a yellowish solid which was recrystallized from methanol, mp 26l-62°C. 1H NMR (00013): 54.05 (s, 12 H), 4.04 (s, 6 H), 7.45 (s, 4 H). Mass spectrum n/g (relative intensity) 358 (48), 343 (100), 328 (9), 313 (8), 179 (3). nnnl. Calcd for C2OH22O6: C, 67.03; H, 6.19. Found: C, 67.11; H, 6.35“ 92 2,3,6,7-Tetrahydroxyanthroquinone,453 A solution of 94 (0.3 g, 0.8 mmol) in 12 mL methylene chloride was addedtx>boron tribromide (1.5 g, 6 mmol) in 10 mL methylene chloride under argon at -78°C. The solu- tion was allowed to come slowly to room temperature, stirred for an additional four hours, then cooled in an ice bath. Ice-water (mlO mL) was added cautiously, and the brown- orange crystals which formed were filtered. Recrystalliza- tion from ethanol gave 0.14 g (67%) bright orange crystals, mp <330°C (dec.) (lit?9 <330°C, dec.). Mass spectrum n/g (relative intensity) 272 (45), 258 (100), 240 (16), 229 (37), 212 (22), 184 (18). l,9,lO-TrimethylanthraceneL 933: Deoxygenation of 44 was carried out in the same manner and scale as 18’ except work—up was carried out in the dark. The crude product was sublimed at 30°C and 0.7 torr to give 0.17 g (80%) yellow needles, mp 76-78°C. 1H NMR (00013): 52.75 (s, 3 H), 2.8 (s, 3 H), 2.95 (s, 3 H), 7.2 (m, 4 H), 7.8 (m, 3 H). Mass spectrum n/g (relative intensity) 220 (100), 205 (47), 189 (11), 178 (8), 101 (8). a: 2. AV o. '1' , M bron ~n1u a stir 0001 en DU 1!. a 6 M: W O ‘lk\ , ‘1‘ i y p 93 4,5-Dibromo—3,6-diiodoveratrole, 96 A solution of 4,5-dibromoveratrole58 (18 g, 0.61 mol) and mercuric oxide (42 g) in 160 mL trifluoroacetic acid was heated to reflux for four hours. The reaction mixture was cooled in an ice bath, and the white solid (4,5-di- bromo-3,6-di-(trifluoroacetatomercurio)veratrole) which formed was filtered. The crude solid was heated at 70-75°C with iodine (60 g) and potassium iodide (40 g) in 200 mL water (mechanical stirrer) for eight hours. After the reaction mixture was cooled, the solid was filtered, and taken up into chloro- form. The organic solution was washed successively with 10% sodium thiosulfate, dilute sodium bicarbonate, and water, dried, and the solvent removed. The off-white solid remaining was recrystallized from chloroform-methanol to give 26.4 g (79% from 4,5-dibromoveratrole) white needles, mp 144-145°C. Mass spectrum n/g (relative intensity) 532 (25), 504 (21), 489 (l4), 405 (5), 390 (15), 254 (l3), 203 (53), 155 (61), 127 (100), 104 (42), 76 (54)- 9,10-Dimethoxyoctamethyl-l,4,5,8-tetrahydrophenanthrene- 1,4L5,8-bis(epoxide)3_,2,7, To a solution of 24 (1.37 g, 2.5 mmol) and tetramethyl- furan, 1639(1 g, 8 mmol) in 50 mL dry ether was added n- butyllithium (9 mmol in 50 mL hexane) dropwise over four at «M. .U A: ‘70 GU Cu «14 fro nee 94 hours. The reaction mixture was allowed to come to room temperature and stirred overnight. Methanol (1 mL) was added, and the mixture was washed with water, dried, and the solvent removed. A light yellow oil remained which could not be purified. l H NMR (00013); 51.65 (s, 6 H), 1.80 (s, 6 H), 1.85 (s, 6 H), 1.86 (s, 6 H), 3.75 (s, 6 H). Mass Spectrum n/g (relative intensity) 382 (10), 339 (100), 328 (29), 296 (85), 285 (50), 281 (79), 165 (45), 123 (87), 71 (89). 9,lO-Dimethoxyoctamethylphenanthrene,»98 Deoxygenation of the crude oil, 21, was carried out in the same manner as 18' The crude product was recrystallized from methanol to give 0.22 g (25% from 94) light yellow needles, mp 187-188°C. l H NMR (00013): 52.30 (s, 6 H), 2.36 (s, 6 H), 2.41 (s, 6 H), 2.80 (s, 6 H), 3.86 (s, 6 H); 130 NMR (00013): 16.78, 16.98, 18.05, 20.82, 60.10, 118.50, 127.20, 131.31, 131.94, 134.08, 146.20. Mass spectrum n/g (relative intensity) 350 (53), 307 (100), 292 (16), 277 (12), 175 (16), 160 (18), 131 (19). Anal. Calcd. for C24H C, 82.24; H, 8.62. Found: 3002‘ C, 82.12; H, 8.75. 95 General Procedure for Photolysis of Anthracenes and Phen- anthrenes The arene to be photolyzed (10-12 mg) was dissolved in 0.5 mL benzene-d6, placed in a 5 mm NMR tube and flushed with nitrogen. Irradiation of the sample for 60-90 minutes using a Hanovia 450 W medium pressure lamp with Pyrex filter was carried out by taping the sample tube directly to the water- cooled Jacket of the lamp. All of the anthracenes and phenanthrenes discussed were irradiated first at room temperature, then at -78°C. For the low temperature runs, toluene-d8 was substituted for benzene—d6 as solvent. The lamp and cooling Jacket along with the sample were immersed in a dry ice-isopropanol bath, and dry nitrogen was passed through the cooling jacket. After irradiation, the sample tube was immediately trans— ferred to the WM 250 NMR spectrometer, pre-set at a suitable temperature between -60°C and room temperature, and the spectrum was recorded. The results are presented in the text. Irradiation of 1,5,9,10-tetramethylanthracene,49, in the Presence of Oxygen The reaction was carried out in the same manner as des- cribed for the room temperature photolyses of arenes, 96 except the sample was undegassed. After irradiating for 1H NMR 30 minutes, the endoperoxide 44% was produced. (benzene—d6): 61.96 (s, 6 H), 2.09 (s, 6 H), 6.75-7.01 (m, 6 H); 13c NMR (benzene-d6): 518.56, 21.87, 81.24, 119.66, 126.91, 131.53, 131.88, 143.80 (a sixth aromatic peak must fall coincidentally under the solvent peak). Mass spectrum n/g (relative intensity) 266 (4), 234 (100), 219 (32), 85 (22), 40 (16). Irradiation of 1,8,9,lO-tetramethylanthracene,48, in the Presence of Oxygen Photolysis of an undegassed sample of 44 for thirty minutes produced endOperoxide $44. 1 H NMR (benzene-d6): 61.79 (S, 3 H), 1.99 (S, 3 H), 2.07 (s, 6 H), 6.71-7.06 (m, 6 H). Mass spectrum n/n (relative intensity) 266 (4), 251 (9), 234 (100), 219 (36), 85 (20)- Reaction of Octamethylanthracene_81 with TFA To a solution of octamethylanthracene 41 (6 mg, 0.02 mmol) in 0.5 mL chloroform-d was added 0.02 mL of 1M tri- fluoroacetic acid in chloroform-d. Immediately, the solu- tion turned a deeper shade of yellow. The l H NMR spectrum of 84 disappeared, and an ESR signal (shown in Figure 6a) was observed. After no change in the spectra of the sample for one hour, the solution was quenched with water. The 1H NMR of octamethylanthracene 81 reappeared unchanged. 97 Reaction of 9—methoxyoctamethylanthracene 28 with TFA The experiment was carried out in the same manner and 1 scale as 88. Initially, the H NMR spectrum was wiped out, and a weak ESR signal (Figure 6b) appeared. After several hours, a new 1H NMR spectrum appeared. After quench- ing with a few drOps of water, the solvent was removed, leaving an off-white residue. This was recrystallized from methanol to give 4 mg (70%) white solid, mp 245-248°C. The spectral data of this solid are consistent with that 1 of the octamethylanthrone 448 (lit.39 mp 251-252°C). H NMR (CD013): 52.28 (s, 6 H), 2.31 (s, 6 H), 2.35 (s, 6 H), 2.54 (s, 6 H), 3.56 (s, 2 H). IR spectrum (CHCl3): 820 l ’1 (m),.l450 cm"l (m), -1 cm“1 (m), 1160 cm’ 1 (w), 1320 cm -1 1580 cm- (m), 1655 cm (s), 1670 cm (s), 2960 cm'1 (s). Mass spectrum m/e (relative intensity) 306 (86), 291 (100). Reaction of 9,10-dimethoxyoctamethylanthracene 84 with TFA The experiment was carried out in the same manner as 88. On addition of trifluoroacetic acid, the solution turned dark blue. But the color faded in an instant to pink, and a new 1H NMR spectrum appeared. Quenching with water, and removal of the solvent gave a pink residue. Fractional re- crystallization of the residue with acetone gave first 8428 (mp 278-280°C), then 8428 (mp 290-292°C), both as white crystalline solids. (The yield of each product determined 98 by integration of the l H NMR was 60% 4888 and 40% 1488. Much product was lost in the isolation). For 1128 - 1H NMR (00013): 52.28 (s, 1 H), 2.51 (s, l H); 130 NMR (00013): 516.90, 17.19, 49.15, 133.29, 134.14, 136.79, 140.73. IR spectrum (CHC13): 880 cm“1 (m), 1240 l (m), 3025 cm"1 (m). Mass spectrum: n/g cm.1 (s), 1410 cm— 320 (32), 305 (100), 290 (24), 277 (10). For $128 - 1H NMR (CDC13): 51.35 (s, 6 H), 1.94 (s, 6 H), 2.20 (s, 6 H), 2.49 (s, 6 H), 4.51 (s, l H). IR spectrum: 1280 cm'1 (m), 1340 cm-1 (m), 1680 cm-1 (s), 1 2940 cm- (s), 3690 cm.1 (br). Mass spectrum n/n (relative intensity) 305 (100), 291 (7).. 1,4,5,8-Tetrahydroanthracene-l,4;5,8—bis(epoxide), 848 To a stirred solution of 1,2,4,5-tetrabromobenzene, 48,52 (3.94 g, 10 mmol) and furan (10 ml) in dry toluene (200 mL) at -23°C under argon was slowly added (4 h) n- butyllithium (7.7 mL, 12 mmol, of a 1155 M solution in hexane diluted with 200 mL of dry hexane). After addition the mixture was slowly allowed to warm to room temperature. Methanol (1 mL) was added cautiously and the mixture was stirred for a few minutes. The organic layer was washed with water and dried. Solvent removal under reduced pres- sure gave a gummy yellow solid which partially dissolved on addition of methanol (10 mL). The off-white crystals which remained (0.7 g) were recrystallized from acetone to 99 give small white plates of the anti isomer, mp (dec) 245°C. The methanol solution was evaporated to dryness and the residue was recrystallized from ethyl acetate-hexane, then from methanol to give the pure syn isomer (0.8 g), mp 1H 191-193°C. The total yield of both isomers was 71%. NMR (00013) (anti): 55.62 (s, 4 H), 7.01 (s, 4 H), 7.18 (s, 2 H); 13c NMR (00013) (£231): 582.23, 113.75, 143.30, 147.69; the NMR spectra of the syn isomer were virtually identical with those of the anti isomer (differences of P‘.‘ {.flmmm 0.01 in the proton spectrum and 0.10 in the carbon spectrum). Mass spectrum (anti) m/g (relative intensity) 210 (43), 184 (26), 181 (13), 156 (34), 155 (63), 154 (31), 153 (100), 152 (73), 151 (18), 128 (22), 127 (13), 126 (10), 87 (12), 85 (29). Anal. (anti): Calcd. for C14H1oo2‘ c, 80.0; H, 4.76. Found: C, 79.95; H, 4.87. Adduct of Anthracene and bis-epoxide 125_(121) A solution of bis-epoxide 125 (anti isomer) (2.1 g, 10 mmol) and anthracene (3.6 g, 20 mmol) in xylene (100 mL) was heated at reflux for 48 h. The reaction mixture was cooled to room temperature and the resulting white precipitate was collected (4.6 g, 80%) as a mixture of 121 and a trace amount of unreacted anthracene. The latter was removed by sublimation to give pure 127, mp 440°C (dec). 1 4.82 (s, 4 H), 6.90 (s, 2 H), 6.98 (m, 4 H), 7.11 (m, 4 H), H NMR (00013): 52.13 (s, 4 H), 4.36 (s, 4 H), 7.19 (m, 4 H), 7.26 (m, 4 H); 13c NMR (00013): 547.48, 48.80, 81.00., 145.6. 191 ( stere OJ 0/ 2C 2 all in aci ac) 100 81.09, 110.08, 123.50, 123.68, 125.70, 125.97, 141.49, 144.25, 145.61; mass spectrum, n/n (relative intensity) 566 (6), 530 (21), 375 (50), 370 (65), 326 (17), 339 (15), 203 (13), 191 (43), 178 (100), 44 (43). Analogous reaction of nynflgé with anthracene gave a stereoisomer of 127 in 60% yield; mp 395°C (dec); 1H NMR ‘ ~ (CDClB): 62.13 (S, 4 H), 4.35 (s, 4 H), 4.80 (s, 4 H), 6.90 (s, 2 H), 6.98 (m, 4 H), 7.12 (m, 4 H), 7.18 (m, 4 H), , if. (in: . 7.26 (m, 4 H); 130 NMR: 547.47, 49.07, 81.18, 110.04, 123.42, 123.70, 125.66, 126.0, 141.34, 144.19, 145.79. Pentiptycene,_l§8 A suspension of 127 (nyn or nnEi) (800 mg, 1.4 mmol) in acetic anhydride (20 mL) and concentrated hydrochloric acid (4 mL) was heated at reflux for 8 h. The cooled re- action mixture was poured into 200 mL of ice-water and the resulting light yellow crystals were extracted with chloroform. The organic layer was washed successively with water and saturated sodium bicarbonate, and dried. Removal of the solvent gave a light yellow residue which was recrystallized from tetrahydrofuran and methanol to give 300 mg (41%) of pentiptycene as small, white plates, mp >500°c. 1H NMR (00013): 55.50 (s, 4 H, bridgehead protons), 7.02 (m, 8 H), 7.40 (m, 8 H), 7.81 (s, 4 H), 8.06 (s, 2 H); 130 NMR (00013): 553.81, 121.34, 123.81, 125,11, 125.71, 130.58, 140.80, 144.40; UV (CH3CN): Amax a fv #b .nnhs. bromc the all 101 371 nm (e 6540), 353 (8830), 336 (7150). 320 (4240), 306 (2030), 284 (212, 000), 272 (81,270), 266 (60,500), 260 (61,600), 243 (23,200). Anal. Calcd for Cu2H26: c, 96.98; H, 4.90. Found: C, 96.46; H, 4.98. Attempted Reaction of Pentiptycenelgg with 1,2,4,5-tetra- bromobenzenes,4_17, 19 and 40 To a solution of 128 (0.7 g, 1.3 mmol) and 11, 19 or 40 (1 mmol) in 200 mL dry tetrahydrofuran at -23°C under argon was added n-butyllithium (1 mmol in 20 mL hexane) dropwise over two hours. The reaction mixture was allowed to come slowly to room temperature, and methanol (1 mL) was added. The mixture was washed with water, dried and the solvent removed. The white solid remaining (~0.7 g) in all cases was found to be unreacted pentiptycene 128. Attempted Reaction of Pentiptycenelgé with Diaryne Pre- cursor 130 Lead (IV) tetraacetate (265 mg, 0.6 mmol in 50 mL tetrahydrofuran) was added all at once to a solution of pentiptycene 128 (350 mg, 0.66 mmol) and bis-triazole 130 (57 mg, 0.3 mmol) in 50 mL tetrahydrofuran under argon at room temperature. The reaction mixture was stirred for thirty minutes at room temperature. A white solid (50 mg) formed which was filtered. .This solid was insoluble .A ‘ f. S l .9. I q .Av‘ 0‘. - ea I’e tu .. n. I“. . I 44 .fi .1 . u ‘0 fi" ..r.\ u I 7 “ a n. w. M: d_ .. S 71 Ad“ C ». ..._ «I. . w; e n u & M. :. , G» unififiu +b ml. 2. t .20. 3.. . t 0 VA .. L. ‘IP 0. . r5 31. a“ re r r 6 102 in all normal organic solvents_as well as water, and did not melt below 500°C. The mother liquor was diluted with water (50 mL) and extracted into ether. The organic layer was washed with water and brine, and dried. Removal of the solvent left 320 mg pentiptycene 128. Attempted Reaction of Pentiptycenenng with Bis-epoxide 125 (anti) A solution of pentiptycene 128 (53 mg, 0.1 mmol) and anti-125 (12 mg, 0.05 mmol) in 20 mL xylene was stirred at reflux for four days. Removal of the solvent left a white 1 residue (65 mg) shown by H NMR to be a mixture of un- reacted 125 and 128. 6,7-Dibromo-l,4—dihydronaphthalene-l,fleepoxide,13% To a stirred solution of 1,2,4,5-tetrabromobenzene, 49,52 (8 g, 10 mmol) and furan, 81, (10 mL) in 200 mL dry toluene at -23°C under argon was added n-butyllithium (22 mmol in 200 mL hexane) dropwise over three hours. The reaction mixture was allowed to come slowly to room tempera- ture after addition. Methanol (1 mL) was added, and the mixture was washed with water, dried, and the solvent re- moved. The remaining yellow, oily solid was treated with hexane to give 4.1 g (70%) small crystals, mp 115-ll7°C 103 (methanol). 1 H NMR (00013): 55.64 (s, 2 H), 6.98 (s, 2 H), 7.45 (s, 2 H); 130 NMR (00013): 581.76, 120.61, 125.43, 142.68, 150.19. Mass spectrum n/n (relative intensity) 302 (9), 276 (19), 193 (100), 113 (46), 87 (21), 63 (25). Adduct ofy132 and Anthracene(13gl A solution of epoxide 132 (1.5 g, 5 mmol) and anthra- cene (l g, 5.6 mmol) in 50 mL xylene was heated at reflux for 72 hr. The reaction mixture was cooled, and 50 mL hexane was added. A light tan solid formed which was col- lected and washed with hexane. Recrystallization of the solid from tetrahydrofuran and methanol gave 2.3 g (96%) small, off-white crystals, mp 265—266°c. l H NMR (CDCl3): 62.09 (s, 2 H), 4.26 (s, 2 H), 4.74 (s, 2 H), 7.02 (m, 2 H), 7.06 (m, 2 H), 7.11 (m, 6 H); 13c NMR (00013): 547.21, 48.45, 80.82, 123.61, 123.81, 124.17, 125.31, 125.9, 126.17, 128.17, 141.10, 143.84. Mass spectrum n/g_(rela- tive intensity) 480 (4), 462 (l), 302 (2), 289 (7), 276 (9), 203 (26), 191 (100), 178 (53). 3,4—Dibromo:L2Pl.lltriptycenea_%%§ A suspension of 134 (200 mg, 0.4 mmol) in acetic an- hydride (10 mL) and concentrated hydrochloric acid (2 mL) was heated at reflux for 24 hrs. The cooled reaction mix- ture was poured into 200 mL ice-water, and the resulting 104 light brown solid was extracted with methylene chloride. The organic layer was washed successively with water and saturated sodium bicarbonate, and dried. Removal of the solvent gave a light brown residue which was recrystal- lized from tetrahydrofuran and methanol to give 110 mg (57%) of 135 as small, off—white crystals, mp 386-388°C (dec.). 1 H NMR (00013): 55.50 (s, 2 H), 7.02 (m, 4 H), 7.41 (m, 4 H), 7.60 (s, 2 H), 7.93 (s, 2 H); 130 NMR (CDC13): 053.62, 120.58, 123.84, 125.78, 131.64, 144.02, 155.16 (lacks two peaks due to quaternary carbons because of low solubility of compound). Adduct of 135_spd Furan (139) To a stirred solution of 135 (250 mg, 0.54 mmol) and furan, 81, (2 mL) in 100 mL dry tetrahydrofuran at -78°C under argon was added n-butyllithium (2 mmol in 100 mL hexane) dropwise over two hours. The reaction mixture was allowed to come slowly to room temperature after addition. Methanol (1 mL) was added, and the mixture was extracted with methylene chloride, washed with water, dried, and the solvent removed. The remaining yellow residue was recrystal- lized from methanol to give 140 mg (71%) small, light yellow crystals, mp 188-190°C. l H NMR (00013): 55.48 (s, 2 H), 5.72 (s, 2 H), 6.88 (s, 2 H), 7.01 (m, 4 H), 7.41 (m, 4 H), 7.65 (s, 2 H), 7.76 (s, 2 H); 130 NMR (00013): 553.92, 81.88, 118.37, 121.64, 122.17, 123.70, 125.52, 125.61, 105 127.43, 141.75, 145.82. Mass spectrum n/n (relative in- tensity) 370 (l), 341 (l), 303 (l), 170 (2), 149 (4), 84 (5), 40 (100). [381.1J-Triptycene, 137 Deoxygenation of 136 was carried out in the same manner and scale as 10. The crude product was recrystallized from tetrahydrofuran and methanol to give 280 mg (79%) small off-white crystals, mp 221-222°C (dec). 1 H NMR (CDCld): 55.53 (s, 2 H), 7.04 (m, 4 H), 7.38 (m, 2 H), 7.44 (m, 4 H), 7.87 (s, 2 H), 7.91 (m, 2 H), 8.22 (s, 2 H); 130 NMR (CDC13): 653.65, 121.31, 123.81, 124.96, 125.61, 125.75, 127.99, 130.52, 131.69, 141.10, 144.19. Mass spectrum n/n (relative intensity} 354 (100), 353 (66), 278 (3), 176 (69). BIBLIOGRAPHY 10. 11. 12. 13. l4. 15. BIBLIOGRAPHY For a review, see Hoffmann, R. w. Dehydrobenzene and Cycloalkynes, Academic Press, New York (1967). Fields, E. K.; Meyerson, S. Adv. Phys. Org. Chem. 1284: 6, 18-21. gittig, G.; Harle, H. Justus Liebigs Ann. Chem. 1989 23, 17. Cragg, G. M. L.; Giles, R. G. F.; R005, 0. H. P. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin I 1918, 1339. Stringer, M. B.; Wege, D. Tetrahedron Lett. 1989, 21, 3832. Hart, H.; Lai, C.-Y.; Nwokogu, G.; Shamouilian, 8.; Teuerstein, A.; Zlotogorski, C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1989, 192, 6649. Sy, A.; Hart, H. J. Org. Chem. 1919,l44, 7. Hart, H.; Nwokogu, G. J. Org. Chem., 1981, 46, 1251. Egrt, H.; Shamouilian, S. J. Org. Chem. 1981, 46, 74. Lehoullier, C. S.; Gribble, G. W. J. Org. Chem. 1988, 48, 1682. Hart, H.; Shamouilian, S.; Takehira, Y. J. Org. Chem. 1981, 4§_, 4427. Skvarchenko, V. R.; Shalev, v. K. Dokl. Akad. Nauk. SSSR, Ser. Khim. 1911, 216, 110. Cadogan, J. I. G.; Harger, M. J. P.; Sharp, J. T. J. Chem. Soc. B 1911, 602. Hart, H.; Ruge, B. Tetrahedron Lett. 1911, 18, 3143. van Tamelen, E. E.; Pappas, S. P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 129%. 85. 3789. 106 16. fill 11 dd ad 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. 27. 28. 29. 30. 31. 107 Franck, R. W.,Mande11a, W. L. ; Falci, K. J. J. Org. Chem. 1918, ‘_Q, 327- Maier, G.; Schnieder, K.—A. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 1989, 19, 1022. Gusten, H.; Mintas, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1989, 102, 7936. Applequist, D. E.; Searle, R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. kgéfi’ §_6_’ 13890 Pritschins, W.; Grimme, W. Tetrahedron Lett. 1919, 2.2, “51450 Pritschins, W.; Grimme, W. Tetrahedron Lett. 1989, _2__3_, 1151. Yang, N. C.; Carr, R. V.; Li, E.; Mcvey, J. K.; Rice, S. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1919, 96, 2297. Cowan, D. 0.; Drisko, R. L.; Elements of Organic Photo- chemistry, Plenum Press, New York (1976), pp. 37:74. Fritsche, J. J. Prakt. Chem. 86 , 101, 333; 86 1116.. 27,. 1.01 __ 5.2 Calas,R .; Lalande,R . Bull. SOC. Chim. Fr. 1989, 763,1999, 776,1999, 144. Chapman, 0. C.; Lee, K. J. Org. Chem. 1989, 95, 4166. Hart, H., unpublished results. Lai, C.-Y., Ph.D. Thesis, Michigan State University, 1981. Low valent titanium produced from zinc and titanium tetrachloride has been used successfully to reduc- tively couple carbonyl compounds: Makaiyama, T.; Sato, T.; Hanna, J. Chem. Lett. W191 1041; and to reduce sulfoxides: Drabowicz, J.; kolajczyk, M. Synthesis, 1918, 138. Best, W. M.; Collins, P. A.; McCulloch, R. K.; Wege, D. Aust. J. Chem. 1989, 95, 843. For papers dealing with strain in 4,5-dimethylphen- anthrenes, see: Frisch, M. A.; Barker, C.; Margrave, J. L.; Newman, M. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1989, 85, 2356; Karnes, H. A.; Kybett, B. D.; Wilson, M. H. Margrove, J. L.; Newman, M. S. Ibid 1989, 81, 5554 32. 33. 34. 32. 33. 34. 35. 36. 37. 38. 39. 40. 41. 108 Dougherty, R. C.; Bertorello, H. E. ,deBertorello, M. M. Org. Mass. Spectrom.1911005,11321; Allinger, N. L.; Kao, J. J. J. Am. *Che 111, 99, 975; Bushmelev, V. A. Shakirov, M. M.; Derendyaev, B. G. Koptyug, V. A. Zh. Org. Khim. 1 15, 1934; J. Org. Chem. USSR (Engl. Trangl.) $919,119, 1747.- Jiang, J. B.—C., Ph.D. Thesis, Michigan State University, 1975. Synthesized by Y. Takehira, unpublished results. Bowden, B. F.; Cameron, D. W. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Comm. 1911, 77- Reduction potentials of series of anthracenes increase almost linearly with the amount of alkyl substitu- tion regardless of the position.36 Although there is no similar compilation of oxidation half-wave po- tentials, it follows that the E1/2 would decrease similarly along the same series. Klemm, L. H.; Kohlik, A. J.; Desai, K. B. J. Org. Chem. 1999, 99, 625. Sullivan, P. D.; Menger, E. M.; Reddoch, A. H.; Paskovich, D. H. J. Phys. Chem. 1919, 23; 1158. Nemoto, F.; Ishizu, K. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1981, 84, 44; Gerson, F.; Kaupp, G.; Ohya- Nishigichi, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Eng1.1911,1§_, 657 Backer, H. J.; Strating, J.; Hiusman, L. H. H. Rec. Trav. Chim. 1999, 99, 761. Wittig, G.; Harle, H.; Krauss, E.; Niethammer, K. Chem. Ber. 1999, 99, 951. See also: Wolthius, E. J. Org. Chem. ,2215; Wittig, G.; Steinhoff, G. Chem. JBer. ,‘;5, 203; Fieser L. F. ; Haddadin, M. J. hem. Soc. 1994, 86, 2081; Parham, M. E. Frazer, M. G. ; Bradsher, . J. Org. Chem. 1911, 37, 358; Sasaki, T. Kanematsu, K.; Hayakawa, K. —J. Chem;Soc;, Perkin I, 1911, 1951; Sasaki, T. ,Kanematsu, K.; Hayakawa, Uchide, M. Ibid 19 2750, Wittig, G.; Reuther, W.‘ Liebggs Ann. Chem. 11; 761, 20; Sasaki, T.; Kanematsu, K.; Hayakawa, Kondo, A. J. Org. Chem. 1919,38 4100; Bremmer, J. B.; Hwa, Y.;*Whittle, C. P.; ust J— Chem. 1 14, 91, 1597; Sasaki, T.; Kanematsu, K.; lizuka, K.; n86, I. J. Org. Chem. 1919, 51, 1425; 42. 43. 44. 45. 46. 47. 48. 49. 50. 51. 52. 53. 54. 55. 56. 57. 109 Sasaki, T.; Kanematsu, K.; Iizuka, K.; Izumichi, N. Tetrahedron1W19 32, 2879; Tochtermann, W.; Malchow, A.; Timm,H hem. —Ber. 1919, 111, 1233, Mori, M.; Hayamizu, A.; Kahematsu, .‘Uhem. Soc. , Perkin I kfiék: 1259- Independent results by N. Raju. Hart, H.; Ok, D., unpublished results. Lipczynska—Kochany, E.; Iwamura, H. Chem. Lett. 1991, 1075. Godfrey, R. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin II, 1918 1019. Attempts in this laboratory to synthesize 141 have to date failed! A report in the literature CIETming to have made 2- amino- 4 ,5 dibromobenzoic acid (from which 141 can be made) by direct bromination of anthranilic a—id is in error.“ J. Indian Chem. Soc. 1919, 56, 1237. Sarauw, Justus Liebigs Ann. Chem. 1919, 209, 125. ngkogu, G. Ph. D. Thesis, Michigan State University, 19 l. Sala, T.; Sargent, M. V. Chem. Commun. 19 , 253; Morris, J. A.; Mills, D. C. Chem. Brit. 8, 326. McOmie, W. F. W.; Harrisons, C. R. J. Chem. Soc. 191 LQQQ, 997. Scheufelen, A. Justus Liebigs Ann. Chem. 1QL9, 231 152; Cox, B.; Kubler, D. G.; Wilson, C. A. Che em. Educ. 1911, 55, 379- Shamouilian, 8., Ph. D. Thesis, Michigan State Uni- versity, 1981. ' McDonald, E.; Suksamrarn, A.; Wylie, R. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin I, 1911, 1893. Iten, P.; Hofmann, A.; Eugster, C. Helv. Chim. Acta, 1919, 61, u3o. Meyer, K. H. Liebigs Ann. Chem. 1911, 319, 37. Attempts to synthesize 99 by another group failed.314 The authors reported that they were only able to 58. 59. 110 isolate tautomer %%§. H Ll§ Tautomer % (20%) was detected by NMR in crude fig in the method of synthesis reported here. Underwood, H. W.; Baril, O. L.; Toone, G. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. ggég, fig, 4087. Boldt, P. Chem. Ber. &géz, 100, 1270. ”'Tliriflfll*rjijfliflfilfifijflflflaiflifliwflfligfiMW“