MSU LIBRARIES —_——. RETURNING MATERIALS: PIace in book drop to remove this checkout from your record. FINES w111 be charged if book is returned after the date stamped be10w. METHODS FOR IMPROVED DETECTION AND SEPARATION IN HIGH PERFORMANCE LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY By Siriwan Ratanathanawonge A DISSERTATION Submitted to Michigan State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Department of Chemistry 1986 ABSTRACT METHODS FOR IMPROVED DETECTION AND SEPARATION IN HIGH pERFORuANOE LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY By Siriwan Ratanathanawongs This dissertation consists of two parts that are related by the need for methods to facilitate the analysis Of complex samples. Two different approaches have been taken. The first area of research involves increasing the sensitivity and selectivity Of the detector through post-column derivatization. The second approach has been to improve chromatographic separation by recycle chromatography. An on-line post-column reaction detector for phenols has been developed. This system links together two highly versatile techniques - high performance liquid chromatography and air segmented continuous flow analysis. The resulting system contains the combined advantages of each system. The reaction employed involves the coupling of phenol and diazotized sulfanilic acid to form an azo dye. The optimum reaction conditions were initially determined by a univariate method and subsequently by simplex Optimization. Other studies performed included compatibility checks between the post-column reaction detector and HPLC systems. The application Of this detector to the determination of phenols in various sample matrices has been described to illustrate its versatility. A new approach to recycle chromatography, recycle heartcut chromatography, has been developed for applications involving complex sample matrices. In this approach, a heartcut is taken from an eluting peak which is then recycled onto the column. The sequence Of heartcut and recycle is repeated until an 'adequate’ separation is Obtained. This technique has been applied to a number of applications to demonstrate its potential. The results show small improvements in resolution and simpler chromatograms due to the isolation of the components of interest for further separation. The amount Of band broadening was studied as a function of the heartcut loop tubing dimensions. A microcomputer controlled HPLC system with time and detector-based heartcutting capabilities was employed. To my family, for all their love and support. ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS A large number Of people have been instrumental in making my stay at Michigan State University a very happy experience. I would like to thank them all for their support and friendship throughout these years. First, there is our fearless leader, Dr. Crouch (I mean, Stan), to whom I am very grateful for his support, guidance and friendship. Special thanks to my dearest friends, Arnie, Bob, Peter and Marguerite, who have always been there when I needed them. Of the Older students, I would like to thank Frank for teaching me how to ride a bicycle (into trees, concrete benches and parked cars) and Pat and Keith for their unique sense of humor. 0f the present group members, there is Paul, who collaborated with Bob to conduct late night chemistry shows e.g., N1: and laser light shows; Helen, who accompanied me on a trip to Detroit Metro and almost didn’t make it back to East Lansing; Tom and Linda, and their camaraderie and driving lessons; Cheryl and Thanksgiving dinner; Mark, the victim of the booby trapped dragons; Max and Emily Post; Jimmy and his kindness; the legendary Nelson and his anti-Midas touch; Adrian and family, Scrabble games and that Middle Eastern salad; Kris, who learned the hard way, how not to connect the tubing from the HPLC detector to the column; and Mayda and Steve, who were assigned various duties because of their lack of group seniority. iii A second group of people that I am very grateful to is the departmental support staff who have assisted me in numerous ways. Finally, I would like to thank my wonderful roommates, Catalina, Regina, Touran and Mireille. iv TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER PAGE LIST OF TABLES viii TABLE OF FIGURES ix I INTRODUCTION A. Reaction Derivatization in Liquid Chromatographymmwwm 1 1. Pro-Column Derivatization 2 2. Post-Column Derivatization 2 3. Post-Column Reaction Detection of Phenolsmm " ___fl_____ 4 B. Recycling Methods in Liquid Chromatographywmmmm 5 1. Resolution Enhancement in Liquid Chromatography_ 6 2. Recycle Heartcut Chromatography 10 II HISTORICAL BACKGROUND A. Continuous Flow Analysis 12 B. Post-Column Reaction Detectors 20 C. Colorimetric Reactions for Phenols 27 D. Recycle Chromatography 30 III DESIGN AND CHARACTERIZATION OF A POST—COLUW REACTION DETECTOR FOR PHENOLS BY AIR-SEGMENTED CONTINUOUS FLOW ANALYSIS A. Overview 36 B. Experimental 1. Apparatus ' 37 2. Preparation Of Solutions for the Determination of Phenols a. ,Reagents 40 b. Phenols Standards 41 c. HPLC Solvents 41 3. Sample Preparation a. River Water Samples 41 b. Residual Fuel Oil Fractions 42 CHAPTER PAGE C. Results and Discussion 1. Introduction 44 2. Reaction Characterization 44 a. Optimization via the Univariate Approach 1 . pH Effects * 45 i i . Influence Of Reagent-to-Substrate Ratio 53 i i i . Effect of Reaction Time 54 iv . Effect Of Temperature 55 b. Simplex Optimization 59 c. Comparison With Other Workers ___‘_____- 67 3. Evaluation of the HPLC/PCR System a. Mobile Phase Effects 68 b. Band Broadening Contributions 71 0. Flow Rate Compatibility 73 d. Statistical Figures of Merit 75 e. Performance Comparison with Other Systems 75 4. Applications 77 a. Determination of Phenols in River Watermwmw 79 b. Phenols Determination in Residual Fuel Oilmm. 82 IV THE DEVELOPMENT OF RECYCLE HEARTCUT CHROMATOGRAPHY FOR ANALYSES IN COMPLEX SAMPLE MATRICES A. Introduction 88 B. Experimental 1. Instrumentation 92 a. HPLC Apparatusmw . 92 b. Microcomputer Controlled HPLC Systemflwww_‘_____._ 93 3' Solution and Sample Preparation“ 97 C. Evaluation of the REC System 1. Reproducibility of Valve Switchings .. 98 2. Band Broadening in the RHC Systeni _ m. 101 a. Heartcut Loop Tubing Dimensions *« 102 b. Partial Filling of the Heartcut Loop: ____________________ 106 1" Applications ...... .c_*.. 111 1- Component iaoiation 113 2- Verification 0f Peak Purityw.“ 117 3- Quantitative Rite 119 3- Conclusions 122 V FUTURE PROS PECTIVES B. Post-Column Reaction Detectors 1. Tandem Analyses _ 124 2. Solvent Segmentation _.. 125 vi CHAPT. C. Recycle Heartcut Chromatographymm LIST 01’ REFERENCES vii PAGE 126 128 TABLE 1.1 2.1 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 3.5 3.6 4.1 4.2 4.3 4.4 4.5 LIST OF TABLES Factors that affect s, N and k'. Applications of post-column reaction detectors.W"mnwmwmn _- ._ Sequential elution solvent chromatography. The extent of reaction completion, X Abs-u, for various reaction times. Values Of the coefficients in the Skinhart-Hart equation for various temperature ranges. Boundary conditions for simplex optimization with the composite modified simplex method. Optimization of the phenol/sulfanilic reaction system by the composite modified simplex method._"___W__w____~__ Comparison of the statistical figures of merit for the determination of phenols through pre- and post-column derivatization. Determining the precision Of valve switchings triggered by peak count, detector threshold (10% full scale) and time. Effect of tubing dimensions on the peak width at half height, wm, of a recycled peak. Comparison of the calculated and experimental band broadening in tubing of various dimensions.WWWhmm Value of peak width at half height, win, that resulted from the recycling of heartcuts that partially filled tubes of different i.d.s to varying extents. Linear regression analysis Of calibration curves for quantitative RHC. viii PAGE 22 43 54 57 63 65 78 100 103 105 112 121 FIGURE 1.1 2.1 2.2 2.3 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 3.5 3.6 3.7 TABLE OF FIGURES Routes for improving chromatographic resolution. quu.u-a~umna Continuous flow analysis output for three different cases a.) ideal b.) nonsegmented and c.) air segmented.m Flow profiles for a.) air segmented and b.) nonsegmented flow streams. Two configurations of recycle chromatography a.) alternate pumping b.) closed loop. Apparatus employed for the post-column detection of phenols using an air-segmented continuous flow analyzer. 1: solvent reservoir; 2: injection valve; 3: analytical column; 4: UV detector; 5: peristaltic pump; 6: reaction coil; 7: calorimeter; 8: bubble gate; 9: readout device. Flow stream path is denoted by —-— and the electrical signal path by --—.___’ CFA manifold employed in this post-column reaction work. Effect of pH on PCR detector response for a reaction time of 15 8. Conditions: 0.05 M sodium borate buffer adjusted to appropriate pH with NaOH or RC]; flow rates: 30 uM phenol in borax buffer - 0.6 ml/min; DSA - 0.03 ml/min. Effect of pH on PCR detector response for reaction times of 35 s (A), 55 s (I) and 130 s (e). Effect of pH on PCR detector response for reaction times of 10 min (e) and 30 min (A). Distribution diagram for diazonium, Aer‘, and phenolste, Ar’O', ions at various pH values. Influence of DSAzphenol ratios and reaction times on the PCR detector signal. DSAzphenOl ratios: 0.7 (e); 1.2 (a); 2.8 (I); 6.7 (o); 12.4 (a); 27.8 (0)2 .....~.—...-..—..—.¢-¢——.. ix PAGE 15 17 32 38 46 47 48 49 51 56 FIGURE 3.8 3.9 3.10 3.11 3.12 3.13 3.14 3.15 3.16 PAGE Temperature studies. PCR flow rates: 80 11M phenol - 0.30 ml/min; 5.9 mM DSA - 0.05 m1/min; pH 10.1 borax buffer - 0.60 ml/min. Reaction time Of 37 s. 58 Progression of a two dimensional simplex over a response surface. Circles represent iso-response conditions. 61 Scatter diagrams of absorbsnce vs. the parameters studied. a.) pH b.) DSA concentration c.) time._______m_w_ 66 Influence of varying CHaCN mobile phase composition on the diazo coupling reaction. HPLC flow rate is 1.0 ml/min with a IX/min gradient. ' 69 Influence of varying CHaOH mobile phase composition on the diazo coupling reaction. HPLC flow rate is 1.0 ml/min with a ZX/min gradient. 70 Comparison of peak widths at half height, wm, for the UV and PCR trace. 72 Flow rate compatibility between the HPLC and PCR systems. Sample consists of phenol, 3,5-dimethylphenol and 2,6-dichlorophenol, with elution in this order. Mobile phase is 60/40 CHaCN/Hzo. Flow rates are a.) 0.5 ml/min b.) 1.0 ml/min and c.) 2.0 ml/minmm-__-_m_ 74 Linear dynamic range of the phenol—sulfanilic reaction. 76 Comparison of UV and PCR detection for the separation Of phenols in a spiked river water sample (Grand River, East Lansing, Michigan). I.) resorcinol, 2.2 ppm 2.) phenol, 1.9 ppm 3.) o-cresol, 2.2 ppm 4.) 3,5-dimethylphenol, 2.4 ppm. HPLC: Spherisorb ODS column; acetonitrile/water (50:50) mobile phase; flow rate of 1.0 ml/min; UV detection at 254 nm; 0.04 AUFS. PCR: manifold as shown in Figure 3.2; detection at 450 nm; 0.10 AUFS. 80 FIGURE PAGE 3.17 Comparison of selectivity of UV and PCR detection for phenols in a spiked river water sample. 1.) phenol, 18.8 ppm 2.) aniline, 19.6 ppm 3.) o-cresol, 21.6 ppm 4.) 3,5-dimethylphenol, 24.4 ppm. HPLC: Spherisorb ODS column; acetonitrile/water (50:50) mobile phase; flow rate of 1.0 m1/min; UV detection at 254 nm; 0.04 AUFS. PCR: manifold as shown in Figure 3.2; detection at 450 nm; 1.0 AUFS. 81 3.18 Reverse phase separation of RFO, fraction #7. HPLC: Spherisorb ODS column; acetonitrile/water (50:50) mobile phase; flow rate Of 1.0 ml/min; UV detection at 254 nm; 0.64 AUFS. PCR: manifold as shown in Figure 3.2; detection at 450 nm; 1.0 AUFS. 83 3.19 Chromatogram of RFO, fraction #7, spiked with a.) 90 ppm phenol b.) 400 ppm phenol. 84 3.20 Chromatogram of RFO fraction #7 diluted 20x and spiked with 32 ppm o—cresol. 86 4.1 HPLC system and valving configuration used to implement recycle heartcut chromatography. 89 4.2 Valve switching sequence employed in RHC, . a.) start-up b.) heartcut c.) column flush and d.) recycle heartcut. 91 _ 4.3 Block diagram of microcomputer controlled HPLC system used in BBC. 94 4.4 An example of s FORTH routine used to take a heartcut based on peak count which is then recycled through the column. 96 4.5 Examples Of FORTH commands used to initiate valve actuation by a.) peak count b.) detector threshold and c.) time after injection. 99 4.6 Heartcuts taken to fill a 60 cm x 0.01" i.d. loop to various extents - 100% loop fill (---—), 75% loop fill (----), 50% loop fill (---) and 25% loop fill (—-). 450 uM naphthalene with a 100% CH30H mobile phase and a 1.0 ml/min flow rate. Detection is at 254 nm and 0.16 AU full scale. 107 xi FIGURE 4.7 4.8 4.9 4.10 4.11 4.12 4.13 Heartcuts taken to fill a 60 cm x 0.02" i.d. loop to various extents - 100% loop fill (---), 75% loop fill (am), 50% loop fill (---) and 25% loop fill (—-). 450 mM naphthalene with a 100% CH30H mobile phase and s 1.0 mI/min flow rate. Detection is at 254 nm and 0.16 AU full scale. Chromatograms Of the recycled peaks that resulted from the partial filling of the heartcut loop (60 cm X 0.01" i.d.). 1 Chromatograms of the recycled peaks that resulted from the partial filling Of the heartcut loop (60 cm x 0.02" i.d.). Isolation of 1,4-androstadiene-3,17-dione from a spiked urine sample. Separation conditions: mobile phase is 85/15 CH30H/H20; flow rate is 1.0 ml/min. Heartcut is time-based and for a volume of 100 ”It“..- Isolation of naphthalene from a mixture of _ polynuclesr aromatic hydrocarbons consisting of naphthalene, biphenyl and phenanthrene. Separation conditions: mobile phase 90/10 CHaOH/H20; flow rate is 1.0 m1/min. Verification of peak purity a.) cycle 1 b.) cycle 2 and c.) cycle 3. Sample is 1.8 x 10" M in naphthalene and 4.7 x 10" M in biphenyl. Calibration curves for naphthalene standards of which two heartcuts have been taken and recycled. 0.... ..............................._..........._. xii PAGE 108 109 110 ~ 114 116 118 120 CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION The determination Of compounds in complex sample matrices Often poses a formidable challenge to the chromatographer. Complications can arise in both the separation and detection stages. They include chemical and spectral interferences, even after an extensive sample workup; aEam — 5:25 a 55:8 Loaoouoo 5:23 .337: Loauoauo couscous a To i? A To 33 of a number of factors were compared (e.g., the relationship between resolution and the number of recycles and the effect of sample concentration on resolution). The advantages of recycling over one cycle systems that yielded equal resolution were noted. The alternate pumping principle was initially introduced for use in SEC by Biesenberger et al. (161) and later adapted to high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) by Henry et al. (168). The apparatus used for alternate pumping recycle chromatography is shown in Figure 2.3b. Sample is introduced via the injection port and initially separated on column 1. The six port valve is used to divert the effluent either to waste or on to column 2. In this way, undesirable components can be removed from the system. As the last peaks elute from column .1, the valve switches so that the pump is now directly connected with column 2. The effluent from column 2 is then diverted onto the head of column 1 after passage through cell 2. This sequence of steps is continued until the sample peaks have broadened to occupy the entire length of the column or an adequate resolution has been achieved. The advantages of AP over the closed loop approach are: (1) decreased band broadening, (2) all types of pumps can be used with AP recycling since the sample does not recycle through the pump and (3) a reference cell through which the mobile phase flows is maintained throughout the separation. The disadvantages, on the other hand, are the necessity for two identical columns -and two high pressure flow cells. The number Of times that a sample can be recycled is limited by the eventual broadening of the sample peaks to occupy an entire column volume. When this happens, the early eluting components start to overlap with the late eluting components. Columns of the same type, but with 34 significantly different separation characteristics can result in a further limitation on the number of recycles. In addition, the valve switching sequence can become very complicated, especially if time is the parameter used to initiate the valve switchings. A third configuration for recycle chromatography was introduced by Minarik et al. (166) in 1981. In this approach, the eluate from the column outlet is repeatedly transported into the column inlet with a circulation valve that is turned by a stepper motor. This approach attempts to combine the advantages of the AP and CL recycling systems. The dead volume in the valve is Of the same order as that encountered in the capillary connections used in AP. The recycling path, however, is similar to that used in the CL pumping principle. This system has been successfully tested in the separation Of a mixture of isophthch acid and its esters by gel permeation chromatography. A technique that should also be mentioned in this section is boxcar recycle chromatography (BRC). This technique which was introduced by Snyder in 1981 (169) combines boxcar chromatography with the alternate pumping method of recycling. Boxcar chromatography is a form of column switching that enables increased sample throughput for routine applications in CC and LC. This is accomplished by continuously injecting samples which are serially separated on the first column. The partially separated components Of interest for each sample injection are diverted onto a second column via a switching valve. A second pump is used to effect separation on the second column. In this way, the second column is filled with a train of samples which is further treated. ' The instrumentation requirement for BRC are two pumps, two switching valves and three columns. The first and second columns are 35 used for performing boxcar chromatography. When the second column is loaded with a train of sample fractions, the third column is switched in and these last two columns are used for recycling. Recycling has been used in gel permeation chromatography for the separation of Oligomers and polymer additives (154), diastereomers (156) and phenols (155). Henry et al. (168) applied the AP method to the separation Of endO/exo isomers Of methyl-1,1-(spirocyclopropyl)-indene by high speed liquid chromatography. Recycle chromatography has also been used in microbore liquid chromatography as reported by Kucera and Manius (170). CHAPTER III DESIGN AND CHARACTERIZATION OF A POST-COLUMN REACTION DETECTOR FOR PHEOLS BY AIR-SEGMENTED CONTINUOUS FLOW ANALYSIS A. OVERVIEW The development of an on-line post-column reaction detector for phenols is described from the initial reaction characterization experiments to the final evaluation and application stage. The technique Of air-segmented continuous flow analysis (CFA) was chosen due to its unique characteristics and suitability as a post-column reaction detector system. The presence of air-segments has two major consequences - reduced longitudinal dispersion due to the break down Of the parabolic flow profile and enhanced mixing within each liquid segment due to the toroidal flow in each Of these segments. The reaction employed in this work involves coupling between a phenol (Ar’OH) and a diazotized aromatic amine (AerC 1") to form an azo dye. The general diazotization and coupling reactions are summarized in Equations 3.1 and 3.2, respectively. . ArNHz + NaNOz + 21101 PI! ArN2*Cl‘ + 2H20 + NaCl (3.1) Aer’Cl" + Ar’OH ?* ArN=NAr’0H + 1101 (3.2) 36 37 The aromatic amine (ArNHx) used in this case is sulfanilic acid. The performance of diazotized sulfanilic acid (DSA) and several other coupling reagents have been evaluated for 126 different phenolic compounds by Koppe et al. (119). Studies by Whitlock et al. (125) and Baiocchi et al. (126) to characterize the reaction and to determine the optimum reaction conditions for DSA have not produced consistent results. It was therefore necessary to undertake an extensive study of the effects Of experimental conditions on the reaction detector response. Simplex optimization was employed to confirm the Optimum reaction conditions. The potential of the post-column reaction detector for use with reverse phase liquid chromatography was investigated by studying the effects of organic solvents on the diazo coupling reaction. Other aspects Of interest were the influence of flow rates on resolution and the degree of band broadening introduced by the detector system. The analytical figures of merit were determined and compared to that Of other systems. TO evaluate the usefulness of the system, the PCR detector was employed for the determination of phenols in fuel and spiked river water samples. B. EXPERIMENTAL 1. Apparatus A schematic of the instrumentation employed in this work is shown in Figure 3.1. The main components of the HPLC unit were a Spectra- Physics SP8700 solvent delivery system (Santa Clara, CA), a Rheodyne 7120 injection valve (Cotati, CA) with a 20 311 sample loop and a 38 .1... as seen Beams 32.3030 05 and ..II an 630.3“. mm fies Scenes 33% 6325 .3025.» 6 “Sum @3933 "m “uses—3.330 "a “:00 someones "m 5539 3.33.3.3.” 6 830306 >3 3 E3300 Romain—use an "039, :ofioogm "N vaccine: .2533 3 3.3.253 no... ceases—moons? so News: 30:23 no HOSOanp 5:381:09 one so» Ochoa—so 25939:. Ad 953...— n IJ nanomeom 3nd; 5 _ L 39 Chromatronix 220 UV detector (Berkeley, CA). Separations were carried out an a 5 pm Spherisorb ODS column (25 cm x 4.5 mm) purchased from Alltech Associates (Deerfield, IL). The PCR system is a miniaturized continuous flow (mCF’) analyzer designed in our laboratory (17,33,43). The peristaltic pump (Model IP-IZ, Brinkmann Instruments, Westbury, NY), used to proportionate reagents to the column effluent, was modified from the original 8 roller assembly to one with 16 rollers for a smoother flow. A‘ dual channel calorimeter (17) with narrow bandpass filters for wavelength discrimination was used to monitor the absorbsnce of the flow stream at 450 nm. Light was transmitted from the source to the calorimeter through a bifurcated fiber optic. The signal from the calorimeter was directed into a "bubble gate" circuit where the effect of the air segments was electronically removed (43) and the resulting signal observed on a digital recorder. As shown in Figure 3.1, the sample is injected into the HPLC system where it undergoes separation on an analytical column followed by UV absorption detection. The column effluent is. then directed to the PCR detector. The interface between the HPLC and PCR systems is a short piece of 0.01" i.d. stainless steel HPLC tubing, which is connected at one end to the output of the UV detector and at the other to a stainless steel reagent addition block on the PCR manifold. The flow stream is immediately air-segmented using the dual pump tube method described by Habig, et al. (39). Reagents are added to the column effluent via a 90° glass tee. Mixing and time delays are accomplished by means of glass coils of various lengths. In the final stage, the analytical stream containing derivatized products passes into a low 40 volume bubble-through flow cell (2 ul) mounted on a calorimeter and then out to waste. Temperature studies were performed with a 30 k9. thermistor (Unicurvefl', Fenwal Electronics, Inc., Framingham, Mass) and a thermastatted water bath. The simplex optimization program (OPTIMA) obtained from Dr. Adrian P. Wade (British Petroleum Research Centre, Middlesex, Great Britain) was run with an IBM compatible microcomputer (PC Designs, Tulsa, Oklahoma). 2. Preparation of Solutions for the Determination of Phenols a. Reagents Commercially available chemicals were used without further purification. Diazotized sulfanilic acid was prepared using the procedure described by Whitlock et al. (125) with some modifications. A 5 mmol amount of the sodium salt of sulfanilic acid was dissolved in 50 ml of distilled water. A 10 ml aliquot of a 50 mM sodium nitrite solution was transferred to this solution followed by cooling to 0°C. After the addition of 2 ml of 2 M HCl, the final volume was adjusted to 100 ml with chilled, distilled water. The diazotized sulfanilic reagent was tested for the presence of excess nitrous acid using starch- potassium iodide paper. If the test was positive, either sulfamic acid or urea was added to decompose the nitrous acid. The reagent was transferred to an amber bottle and stored at 5°C. The pH of the 0.05 M sodium borate buffer was adjusted by the addition of 1101 or NaOH. A surfactant, Brij' 35 (Fisher Scientific 41 Company, Fair Lawn, NJ), was added to all solutions in quantities of 0.5 ml per liter of solution. b. Phenol Standards Standard solutions of phenol were made from a 1 mg/ml phenol stock solution (Sigma Chemical Company, St. Louis, MO). Solutions of higher concentrations were made from phenol crystals. All phenolic compounds used were purchased from Aldrich Chemical Company (Milwaukee, WI), Eastman Organic Chemicals (Rochester,NY), and K & K Laboratories (Cleveland, OH). Brij' (0.5 ml/l) was added to all the standards. c. HPLC Solvents Spectral grade HPLC solvents (Burdick and Jackson, Muskegon, MI) were filtered through a 0.45 pm filter and degassed with helium prior to use. 3. Sample Preparation 8. River Water Samples Water samples collected from the Grand River (Lansing, M1), were filtered through a 0.45 pm filter prior to injection into the HPLC system. The samples were stored at 4°C with no added preservatives. The recommended technique (171) for the preservation of phenols in waste waters is the addition of copper sulfate and phosphoric acid to samples, followed by storage at 4°C. These conditions inhibit the breakdown of phenols due to microbiological activity. As the effect of this 42 preservation method on organic moieties has not been studied and the water samples were used within 48 hours of collection, no preservatives were added. Ettinger et al. (172) have reported a 15% loss of phenolic content in an unpreserved river water sample that had been stored at 4°C for four days. b. Residual Fuel Oil Fractions The residual fuel oil (RFO) samples were obtained from the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA). Sample preparation consisted of an initial fractionation step by means of sequential elutian solvent chromatography (173,174). This method involves the use of nine solvent mixtures of varying polarities to elute compounds containing different functional groups. The solvent mixtures and the functionalities to be found within each fraction are summarized in Table 3.1. This step was carried out using a flash chromatography apparatus (J. T. Baker 00., Phillipsburg, NJ) which consisted of a 2 cm column packed with 17 cm of 40 um 'Flash’ silica gel. A 20 g quantity of silica gel on which 0.5 g of sample had been deposited was placed over the packed bed. A 300 ml amount of each solvent mixture was sequentially added to and eluted from the column. A back pressure of nitrogen (2-5 psi) was used as the driving force to speed up the eluting process. Each fraction was collected and the solvent evaporated to yield a concentrated sample. An RFO fraction containing phenols, fraction #7, was employed in this work. 43 Table 3.1. Sequential Elution Solvent Chromatography. Fraction no. Solvent Mixture Compound Types Hexane Roxane/15X Benzene Chloraform Chloraform/10X Ether Ether/3% Ethanol Methanol Chloraform/3%Ethanol Tetrahydrafuran/ 3% Ethanol Pyridine/3% Ethanol Saturates, Alkenes Aromatics Polar aromatics Monophenals Basic nitrogen heterocycles, (diphenols) Highly functional molecules Polyphenols Phenolics, O - compounds Heterocycles 44 C. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 1. Introduction The results of the work done in the various developmental stages of a post-column reaction detector for phenols are presented and discussed in this section. The effect of changes in variables such as p11, reaction time, reagent-to-substrate ratio and temperature on the diazo coupling reaction was investigated. Studies were carried out via both univariate and simplex optimization. These findings have been compared with those of other researchers. The extent of compatibility between the separation (HPLC) and PCR detection (air-segmented CFA) systems was studied. The aspects of interest were the compatibility between the media and the flow rates of the separation and detection systems as well as the degree of band broadening introduced by the PCR detector. The statistical figures of merit are reported along with a comparison of this method to other methods for determining phenols. This section concludes with some applications to actual samples; these help to demonstrate the advantages of post-column reaction detection of phenols separated by HPLC. 2. Reaction Characterization The reaction characterization and optimization studies were carried out on the mCF reaction system without coupling to the HPLC unit. The manifold employed throughout these studies, unless otherwise stated, is 45 shown in Figure 3.2. Phenol was used in all of the characterization experiments. 8. Optimization via the Univariate Approach The following optimization with the univariate method was performed by changing one reaction condition at a time (keeping all others constant) and recording the resulting absorbsnce value. i. pH Effects. Borate buffers of different pH values were used to attain the necessary solution pH. Pump speeds and coil lengths were varied as needed to produce the desired reaction times. The effect ‘of pH on the detector response at varying reaction times is shown in Figures 3.3 - 3.5. For all the curves, an optimum can be seen at ' approximately pH 10. The general peak shapes can be explained by considering the following equilibria: Ar’OIl i‘é Ar’O" + 11* pk; = 9.89 (3.3) Aer“ F3 AerOH “6* AerO‘ + H" pK1 + pKz = 20.96 (3.4) The reaction is an electrophilic aromatic substitution with the reactive species being the diazonium, Aer, and the phenolate, Ar ’0', ions. These two species predominate at conflicting pH conditions. Thus, the response increases to an optimum and then decreases as the ratios of the reactive species change with pH. The plateau regions which extend over a range of pH values in Figure 3.4 can be varied by changing the amount of DSA added. Higher precision should be obtained in this region as small fluctuations in pH would cause no changes in absorbsnce 46 .5753 someones can—00:38 25 5 “530380 Bahama EV 04 Each. 30.. 302 35802 47 0.7 - 0.8 '- 005 - 0.4L // 0.3 :- / ° 0.2 " 0.1 '- Abaarbonce 0.0 *- 4 1 ~ . L . L . l . l L 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0 11.0 12.0 pH Figure 3.3. Effect of pH on PCR detector response for a reaction time of 15 s. Conditions: 0.05 M sodium borate buffer adjusted to appropriate pH with NaOH or RC]; flowrates: 30 11M phenol in borax buffer - 0.6 ml/min; DSA - 0.03 nil/min. 48 0.7 - Absorbonce Figure 3.4. Effect of pH on PCR detector response for reaction times of 35 s (A), 55 s (I) and 130 s (O). 49 A '\s 0.0 , r //’ :\F 0.5 - ‘ 0.4 P 0.3 '- Absarbonce 0.2 b 0.1 - \‘ 0.0 '- l n L L I 1 I L l L S 7.0 ‘ 0.0 9.0 10.0 11.0 12.0 0“. Figure 3.5. Effect of pH on PCR detector response for reaction times of 10 min (a) and 30 min (A). 50 readings. The various shapes of the curves arise from the different reaction times used. This aspect is discussed in a later section. A distribution diagram for the diazonium and phenolate ions as a function of pH is shown in Figure 3.6. The standard Henderson- Hasselbach equation, pH : pK + log [5L [HA] was used for computation of the mole fraction of phenolate. A derived expression was used for calculations involving the diazonium ion. The necessity of a derived equation arises from the differences between the hydrolysis characteristics of the diazonium ion and those of the 'classic’ dibasic acids, in that, for the former case, K2 ) K1 . Neutralization curves of aqueous solutions of diazonium salts do not yield two - inflection points with an intermediate pH region as is normally observed for dibasic acids (175). Instead, one step that extended over two equivalents of base per diazonium ion was observed. This anomalous behaviour was first reported by Schwarzenbach (176) who proposed possible explanations for this phenomenon. Since K2 ) K1 , individual constants were not available and the overall equilibrium constant was used in the calculation of the mole fraction of diazonium ions at different pH values. Shown below is the derivation of an equation 51 LO — 0.8 - O.6 *- Mole Fraction 0.2 - Figure 3.6. Distribution diagram for diazonium, Aer', and phenolate, Ar’O", ions at various pH values. 52 which makes possible the use of the overall equilibrium constant, pKi + p82 , in this calculation. Referring to Equation 3.4, P. N p II [Aer OH] [11*] [ArNa’] K: = [AerO'][H°] [MNzOH] KiKz = [3*]2[ArN20'] [Aer’] pKi 4‘ pKz = 21:11 - log LArN20;]_ cat-mm- [ArNi’ pH : pK1 + pKz + 1 log _[_A_EN30'I 2 2 [ArNs’] Calculations employed the equilibrium constants given alongside Equations 3.3 and 3.4 (177,178). The resulting distribution diagram, Figure 3.6, shows that the amounts of diazonium and phenolate ions are maximized relative to each other at pH 10.2. (The intersection of the lines mark the point of optimum pH.) It should be noted that the presence of an optimum pH does not dictate that the reaction will proceed as other aspects have to be taken into account. These include the types and positions of substituents on the aromatic ring. In general, electron withdrawing substituents do not promote the diazo coupling reaction. Substitutions occur at the para and artho positions, with preference for the former. Thus, phenols with substituents at both the ortho and para positions do not undergo reaction with diazotized sulfanilic acid. Large and bulky substituents may also inhibit the reaction due to steric hindrance. 53 ii. Influence of Reagent-to-Substrate Ratio. The influence of the reagent-to-substrate concentration ratio was investigated by the addition of diazotized sulfanilic acid solutions of different concentrations to the buffered flow stream containing phenol. The absorbance values obtained at different reagent-ta-substrate ratios and reaction times are shown in Figure 3.7. Pump speeds and coil lengths were varied as needed to produce the desired reaction times. Theoretical calculations of the mole fraction of diazonium and phenolate ions, Figure 3.6, show that the two species are present in equal amounts (0.7 mole fraction) at a pH of 10.2. Thus, working at this pH, a DSA:phenol ratio greater than one should produce no increase in the maximum absorbance. However, a definite kinetic effect is observed as demonstrated in Figure 3.7. There was a decrease in the time required for the reaction to go to completion as the amount of reagent added was increased. Results indicate that the mole ratio of DSA to phenol should be greater than or equal to three for the reaction detector to attain a maximum response in less than 60 s. iii. Effect of Reaction Time. The dependence of detector response on reaction time when different DSA:phenol ratios are used is demonstrated by Figures 3.3 - 3.5 and 3.7. From the data presented in Figures 3.3 - 3.5, the degree to which the reaction has proceeded to completion, given by X Abs-u, is calculated for the different reaction times. These values are summarized in Table 3.2. The reaction was 97% complete when a delay time of 35 s was employed and 100% complete for a 55‘s and 130 s delay. When a reaction time of 10 min and greater was used, secondary reactions (179) may be taking place as evidenced by the increase in maximum absorbsnce and the appearance of a second 54 Table 3.2. The extent of reaction completion, 2 Abs... for various reaction times. Time (8) Abs 3 Abs-a x ‘ 15 0.48 83 35 0.56 97 55 0.58 100 130 0.58 100 600 0.63 109 1800 0.70 121 ' Assuming that the reaction is complete at 130 s. 55 peak. These observations are supported by the results shown in Figure 3.7. The time needed for the reaction to go to completion is less than 45 s when DSAzphenol ratios greater than 2.8 are used. The results shown in Figures 3.3 - 3.5 and Table 3.1 were obtained with a reagent- to-substrate ratio of 3.3. Based on these results and considerations of throughput and sensitivity, the optimum reaction time selected was in the range of 35 s to 55 s. iv. Effect of Temperature. Temperature studies were carried out with glass reaction coils built into plexiglass water jackets. A thermistor was used to measure the temperature of the thermostatted flow stream as it exited the flow cell. The thermistor was calibrated via the Skinhart—Hart equation: T ml 2 A + B(ln R) + C(ln R)’ where T is temperature and R is the resistance. The coefficients A, B and C were experimentally determined for different temperature ranges using the following procedure (180). The thermistor was submerged in a thermostatted bath of known temperature. Resistance readings were recorded at three different temperatures in 10°C intervals. This yielded a solvable set of three equations with three unknowns. The values for. A, B and C at the different temperature intervals are given in Table 3.3. To prevent erroneous readings as air and liquid segments flowed pass the thermistor, the flow stream was debubbled prior to measuring temperature. The previously established optimum reaction conditions were used in this study. A plot of the results shown in Figure 3.8 indicates little change in detector response between 21.0 °C and 28.0°C. Therefore, normal fluctuations in room temperature should have little 56 l l I I 0.6 - q .1 0.) 0 ——A—— ‘— C uni O .0 L- .. O (I) .0 < c- i O. J J 1 1 l 1 1 1 J_ l 1 1 1 L l 1 1 L L l L 1 1 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 Reaction time (min) Figure 3.7 . Influence of DSA:phenol ratios and reaction times on the PCR detector signal. DSA:phenol ratios: 0.7 (s); 1.2 (A); 2.8 (s); 6.7 (a); 12.4 (A); 27.8 (s). Table 3.3. 57 Values of the coefficients in the Skinhart-Bart equation for various temperature ranges. Temperature A B C Interval (°C) 21 - 30 0.1326 -0.05954 0.002789 31 - 40 0.05351 -0.02261 0.001594 41 - 50 0.03578 -0.01446 0.001373 51 - 60 0.01001 0.001121 0.0005273 58 0.8 1 I I I l 0.6 - ‘ Q) C U 1- C O D 0.4 ~ " i... O U) .. .0 < -—1 0.2 '- 1 l 1 l 1 l l l ‘ 1 1 080.0 30.0 40.0 50.0 Temperature (0C) Figure 3.8. Temperature studies. PCR flow rates: 80 uM phenol - 0.30 mein; 5.9 mM DSA - 0.05 ml/min; pH 10.1 borax buffer - 0.60 ml/min. Reaction time of 37 s. 59 effect on the absorbance signal, and thermostatting is not essential. A decreased signal observed at temperatures above 28.0 °C can be attributed to the increased thermodynamic and kinetic feasibility of secondary reactions. b. Simplex Optimization A univariate optimization in which one variable is changed while all others are held constant is the scheme most commonly employed for establishing the best reaction conditions. The assumption made in this approach is that all the variables are independent of each other. A false optimum may be found if this assumption is incorrect. Therefore, simplex optimization was used to test the optimum conditions established by the univariate approach. For a better understanding of the work done in this section, it is necessary to present a brief discussion on the historical progression and the basic rules of simplex optimization. Simplex optimization was first presented by Spendley et al. (181). This method suffered a number of limitations, some of which were the inability to accelerate a simplex over the response surface when searching for an optimum and the lack of verification procedures to confirm that the optimum found is a true optimum. In 1965, Nelder and Mead (182), proposed the 'modified simplex optimization’ which introduced new operations that would overcome some of the limitations of the original procedure. These operations included expansion and contraction of the simplex. Since these early works, a large number of papers have been published concerning applications of simplex optimization and further modifications to the basic method (183-190). In 1985, Betteridge and coworkers (191) introduced the 'composite modified simplex' (CMS) method which incorporated many of the modifications previously proposed by other workers. A second paper by this group (192) evaluated and compared the performance of the CMS method to that of other modified simplex methods. The program developed by Betteridge et al., OPTIMA, was the one employed in this work. A simplex is a geometric figure whose number of vertices is equal to one more than the number of variables (or dimensions) being investigated. A simplex in two dimensions is a triangle. In three dimensions, it is a tetrahedron. Higher dimensions are often used, but the figures are not as easily visualized. For the purpose of introducing the principles of simplex optimization, a two dimensional simplex will be used. Figure 3.9 shows the progress of the two dimensional simplex on a contour map as it moves towards the optimum. The contour lines (circles) on the response surface represent different combinations of the two parameters being studied that would give equal responses. The objective is to rapidly move the simplex towards the region of optimum response. This progression is guided by a set of rules, of which only the basic ones are discussed here. First, after the evaluation of the initial simplex, a move is made after each response. Second, the point . that gives the worst response is discarded and its mirror image across the face of the remaining points becomes the new vertex of the simplex. In Figure 3.9, the initial simplex is a triangle defined by vertices 1, 2 and 3. Point 1 gives the worst response of the three and is reflected across the face 2-3 to generate point 4. The new simplex has as its vertices, 2, 3 and 4. The response at point 4 is obtained and the next move is made based on this value. This process continues until the 61 Figure 3.9. Progression of a two dimensional simplex over a response surface. Circles represent iso-response conditions. 62 simplex starts to circle which signifies that an optimum has been found. This optimum may be a local optimum rather than a global optimum. This could be verified by restarting with a larger simplex. A third rule is used to prevent the simplex from oscillating when the reflected point yields the lowest value in the new simplex. When this happens, the second to lowest response in the new simplex is reflected to obtain the new simplex. A large number of rules not mentioned above are used in the OPTIMA program to handle the pitfalls of the original simplex method. These include the expansion, contraction, polynomial fitting and redirection of the simplex. However, rather than going into extensive explanations, this part is best left to the interested reader to pursue. The three rules mentioned above should be sufficient information for the reader to follow the progression of the three dimensional simplex used in this work. Before starting the simplex optimization, the boundary conditions listed in Table 3.4 were established for the variables to be tested. This was based on a general knowledge of the system. For instance, the diazo coupling reaction with phenol does not proceed in acidic solutions. This places a lower limit on the pH region that was studied. Sodium borate has a buffering range between pH 8.0 and 11.8. Thus, the pH interval to be investigated was set at 7.0 to 12.0. The peristaltic pump has an arbitrary speed setting which ranges from 1 to 99. The lower boundary was set based on the flow rates at pump settings ( 20 being too slow. The upper limit of the DSA concentration was established by the decomposition observed at high concentrations. 63 Table 3.4. Boundary conditions for simplex optimization with the composite modified simplex method. Variable Lower Upper Limit Limit pH 7.0 12.0 Pump speed 20 99 [DSA] (mM) 1.5 16.6 64 The reaction manifold was thermostatted at 26.5 °C throughout these experiments. The phenol solution employed was 30 11M and the sampling and wash times were 40s and 20s, respectively. The blank was borax buffer and DSA. The parameters varied were reaction time, pH of the reaction medium and the reagent concentration. The response optimized was absorbance. The readings obtained for each set of conditions were entered‘into the microcomputer and the next set of conditions was generated. The results of the simplex optimization are summarized in Table 3.5. The final simplex has as its corners, experiments that have yielded the highest absorbsnce readings, namely, numbers 3, 7, l3 and 14. The largest absorbsnce value of 0.31 was measured for simplex no. 3. The response obtained when the reaction was carried out using conditions determined univariately, 0.30 AU, was not significantly different from that obtained at the optimum conditions established by simplex optimization. The precision of the absorbance readings is £0.01 AU. The four points of the final simplex were all obtained in the pH interval of 10.2 10.5 indicating an optimum pH region. This observation coincides well with that made in the univariate experiments as well as the value predicted using dissociation constants. The magnitude of this pH interval will, once again, depend on the amounts of DSA added. The major factor influencing the response of the PCR detector is pI-l as demonstrated by the scatter diagrams shown in Figure 3.10. A definite optimum is observed for this variable. However, there appears to be no clear trends in the effects of reaction times and DSA concentrations on the PCR response in the intervals studied. Table 3.5. 65 Optimization of the phenol/sulfanilic reaction system by the composite modified simplex method. Expt Simplex Time' pH” [DSA] Abs° no. Vertices (s) (mM) (AU) 1 1 16 8.06 1.50 0.09 2 49 8.06 1.50 0.06 3 67 10.08 1.50 0.31 4 67 8.69 7.70 0.25 5 3,4, 1,2 127 10.67 4.27 0.28 6 3,5,4,1 56 11.40 5.58 0.20 7 3 ,5 ,4,6 67 10.58 4.56 0.30 8 3,7,5,4 83 11.61 1.50 0.05 9 3,7 ,5,4 72 9.44 5.30 0.29 10 3,7,9,5 48 9.40 2.07 0.29 1 1 3,7 ,9,10 127 10.48 4.27 0.26 12 3,7 ,9,10 56 9.66 2.62 0.30 13 3,7,12,9 60 9.78 2.82 0.30 14 3,7,13,9 60 10.64 1.50 0.30 15 3,7,13,14 72 9.62 3.65 0.29. Univariate Method 45 10.10 5.90 0.30 ' Time was measured for each pump setting used. ” pH of solution measured after reaction has proceeded. C Average of triplicate measurements. 66 as: 3 someones—00:00 (mm #0 03030 9.3080ch 05 .m> 00:00.3st «0 030.530 003.com .25 0.53m :0 A... 3 an: o9 2. 8. as 2 o . 1 a a q u 00 0 To v a s O o «.o u v N M . ...._ om on no 3 To 3.5 :33 1.. O m h 0 n v n p o . e— n— N— Z a— a a q q q a q . q a q oo . . . 4 a \1 m o o o I. F-o o v 1 a s o J «.o u 0 V N o a o . «.0. 0o 0 00 m .. n6 0 0&0 106 A... od '6 v6 BONVBUOSBV A6. 67 0. Comparison With Other Workers It should be noted that the optimum reaction conditions reported by other workers for this reaction are not entirely in agreement with those established here. Whitlock et al. (125) reported that, for phenol, the optimum pH was 8.5. A sodium bicarbonate buffer was used, and the reaction required 2 min for completion. Preliminary experiments performed in our laboratory to characterize the reaction also employed sodium bicarbonate as the buffer. The optimum pH determined with this buffer agreed with that reported by these workers. However, the buffer was changed to sodium borate due to the poor buffering capacity of sodium bicarbonate at pH 8.5. The two different optimum pH values obtained indicate that one or both buffers are not inert.‘ Other observations made by Whitlock et al., such as the effect of excess reagent and the stability period for the DSA reagent are in agreement with our findings. Baiocchi et al. (126), reported an aptimum pH of 11.0 in their work on pro-column derivatization of phenols by sulfanilic acid. In this case, NaOH was added to obtain the desired pH. Their reported reaction time was 15 min, and the optimum DSAzphenol ratio was 40:1; both of these . are much larger than values determined in this work. In addition, the reagent had to be used within 10 minutes of its preparation. These observations may be due to improper preparation of the diazotized sulfanilic acid. If the starting compound is sulfanilic acid, rather than its sodium salt, an indirect diazotization needs to be carried out (130). That is, prior to diazotization, sodium carbonate is added to the solution 68 containing sulfanilic acid to convert it to the water soluble form. This step was not reported by Baiocchi and coworkers. 3. Evaluation of the HPLC/PCR System The optimized PCR detector for phenols was used in conjunction with an HPLC apparatus with UV detection for system characterization studies. The performance of the PCR detector was evaluated with respect to its compatibility with the chromatographic conditions, band broadening contributions, detection limit, linear dynamic range and precision. a. Mobile Phase Effects The effect of varying amounts of common reverse phase solvents on the detector response was" investigated. A 75 11M phenol solution prepared in pH 10.1 borax buffer was continuously added to and mixed with the column effluent. The manifold employed was identical to that shown in Figure 3.2. The UV and PCR detector responses were monitored while running a gradient of water/acetonitrile (Figure 3.11) or water/methanol (Figure 3.12). A drift of 1% in the detector signal is observed as the acetonitrile composition of the mobile phase spanned 0% to 80%. The upper limit was set by the solubility of sodium borate in acetonitrile. A decrease in the signal was observed when the percentage of methanol was increased beyond 60%. This effect may be attributed to a combination of different factors among which are solvent polarity and proton donating ability. The blank signal shows no change for either solvent. From these results, it was concluded that 69 000620 £53: 0 50: 58>:— oé am 300 30: 0.75 6030000 0:20:00 0030 05 :0 sawawaaasou 000:0 0:000 2050 05.300, uo 00:03.03 .36 0.305 2:): msE. .\.o.n 30.0 00050 0.306 5 20.310 o\.. 0.0 m0 0.. EDNVBHOSBV 70 a as... 55:... o; a 3.: .6: 0.80 4030000 :w6\xw 503000.. 359300 0030 05 :0 cowuwaoasao 000:0 "Janos ~3an 800.300, a0 0000335 .NA.« 0.305 0.0 0.0 “2.5: 05:... e 0.. Lo. 0.. 0 m. n p h b i? n 0 ON 00 0m 00 00. $23 232: s Ionzo .x. 0.. EDNVBHOSBV 71 acetonitrile is the more versatile solvent, especially for separations requiring gradient elution. Also, a slightly higher response was obtained in acetonitrile (0.56 AU) than in methanol (0.51 AU). This may be due to a shift of has from 430 nm for acetonitrile to 420 nm for methanol. b. Band Broadening Contributions Laminar flowing streams in open tubes have a characteristic parabolic flow profile. The particles that are adjacent to the walls of the tubing travel at a slower velocity than those towards the center of the tube (due to viscous drag along the walls). The result of this phenomenon is longitudinal dispersion in the tube. When air segments are added to the flowing stream, this parabolic flow profile is broken down and thus dispersion is reduced. This reduction of dispersion is particularly dramatic when long sections of tubing have to .be used. The degree of band broadening introduced by the PCR detector was examined. For the most accurate results, pyrogallol was employed. This trihydroxy phenol is weakly retained by the ODS column. A typical peak width comparison for the two detectors is shown in Figure 3.13. From the ratio of the peak widths at half height of the UV and PCR responses, the amount of band broadening was found to be 51-20%. This value demonstrates the effectiveness of air-segmentation and the miniaturized CFA instrument in limiting dispersion. 72 uv ----- PCR — for the UV Comparison of peak widths at half height, wm. Figure 3.13. and PCR trace. 73 c. Flow Rate Compatibility Studies were done to determine whether there was a limitation placed on the flow rate of the HPLC system by the PCR system or vice versa. The flow rates were varied in the range normally used for HPLC, that is, 0.5 ml/min to 2.0 ml/min. A sample mixture of phenol, 3,5-dimethylphenol, and 2,6-dichlorophenol was injected in 20 ul quantities. The responses for flow rates of 0.5 ml/min, 1.0 ml/min and 2.0 ml/min are illustrated in Figure 3.14. The mobile phase was 40%:60% water:acetonitrile. The resolution of the separated peaks is maintained by the PCR system within this flow rate interval. This demonstrates the efffectiveness of air-segmentation in limiting dispersion. ,The reason for the varying relative peak heights at different flow rates originates from the difference in reaction kinetics for each phenolic compound. Since the manifold was not changed, the reaction time used decreased with increasing flow rates. Thus, the coupling reaction of _ each compound was reaching a different degree of completion. The conclusion to be drawn from these results is that there is a compatibility in flow rates between the two systems for this particular reaction. This conclusion should be extended to other systems with some caution. This is because the flow rate and the reaction time needed are the factors that determine the coil length that has to be used. For instance, for a flow rate of 2 ml/min and a reaction time of 5 min, the coil length needed would be 330 cm (coil i.d. of 0.1 cm). This is not a 'practical’ length. 74 o.) b.) c.) m L Ami Figure 3.14. Flow rate compatibility between the HPLC and PCR systems. Sample consists of phenol, 3,5-dimethylphenol and 2,6-dichlorophenol, with elution in this order. Mobile phase is 60/40 CH3CN/Hz0. Flow rates are a.) 0.5 mein b.) 1.0 ml/min and c.) 2.0 ml/min. 75 d. Statistical Figures of Merit The detection limit (S/N = 2) for phenol with this PCR detector is 0.75 pH. The molar absorptivity of the phenol derivative (22500 1 mol'1 cm") (calculated) is 16 times that of phenol itself (1400 1 mole"1 cm") (193). The linear dynamic range of the reaction, shown in Figure 3.15, spanned over 2 orders of magnitude, from 0.75 1111 to 150 Md. The upper limit was established by deviations from Beer’s law which resulted from instrumental effects rather than chemical. Reproducibility, based on 15 injections of 100 ”M phenol standards into the HPLC, was $0.64X. e. Performance Comparison with Other Systems As mentioned earlier, no colorimetric-based post-column reaction detectors for phenols have been developed. For this reason, it is not possible to compare the performance of the developed detector to other post-column colorimetric systems. Instead, the following discussion will focus on a comparison of the post-column derivatization of phenols with fluorescence detection and precolumn derivatizations with colorimetric detection to the system developed in this work. The systems that were compared included two post-column derivatization schemes with fluorescence detection that have been repoer by Cassidy et al. (194) and Wolkoff and Larose (8). The PCR detector reported by the first set of investigators measured the fluorescence of derivatives formed from the reaction between hydroxyphenyls and dansyl chloride (1-dimethyl-aminonaphthalene-S- sulfonyl chloride). The second PCR system, described by Wolkoff and Larose, involved the indirect detection of phenols through the reduction of cerium (IV) by phenols to the fluorescing species, cerium (III). An 76 4.00 '- 3.00 2.00 ABSORBANCE 1.00 0.000 0.000 Figure 3.15. 4 1 1 J 1 L . 1 50.0 100. 150. 200. CONCENTRATION (um) Linear dynamic range of the phenol-sulfanilic reaction. 77 air-segmented continuous flow analyzer was used as the PCR system. Two other systems included in this comparison involve precolumn derivatization of phenols with 4-aminoantipyrine (147) and sulfanilic acid (126) to form derivatives that absorb in the visible region. The reported analytical figures of merit for the fluorescent and colorimetric systems are summarized in Table 3.6. The figures quoted in this table for the fluorescent systems do not represent an accurate comparison with the colorimetric based detectors because different compounds were used. For example, phenol was used for the colorimetric systems, hydroxyphenyl for the dansyl chloride reaction and o—chlorophenol for the cerium system. The analytical figures of merit that are listed in Table 3.6 indicate that post-column derivatization with diazotized sulfanilic 'acid, when compared to the other systems, shows the best overall results. The linear dynamic range spans over two orders of magnitude, and the precision (determined by multiple injections of phenol and measurement of the peak height) is a factor of ten better than that achieved by pre- column derivatization with 4-aminoantipyrine (4-AAP). The higher detection limit observed for post-column derivatization with sulfanilic acid, in comparison to the other colormimetric procedures, is due to dilution "of the separated sample as reagents are added. It should be noted, that although fluorescence in general, is a more sensitive detection mode than (JV-visible absorption, it suffers to a larger extent from interferences. As a result, fluorometric detection may not be suitable for analyses of complex samples without extensive sample pretreatment. Fluorescence also suffers from a number of inherent problems, one of which is self absorption. This is the factor that limits 78 0E:_00I0.a I 0.5 6050—50200 I 0 60000000005 I m "000 00030>0an< 83085 8: u S: a u and 0 95 05.4 mm“ a a med 0 0.5 05003.5 0: $0 02 I 2.0 3.0 0 ~60 £05030 mfi . 3 I do 3.0 m 000 53.80 83.820 X: 0; 0mm .. o; u 0 000 7850 :3 80.80 :3 050 8385.5 503083.80 80 005 008200 508380 50880 .8 on»... 05050 5.85 8 :35838 20 .80 0.8.- 8 8.500 50803.. 20 8 5.0.8050 .3" £5... 00300550001 538$qu .000 I003 Aha—0.3.. 79 the linear dynamic range of the cerium PCR detector. Self absorption has been observed at high concentrations of cerium (IV) sulfate (196). 4. Applications The performance of the reaction detector as a sensitive and selective HPLC detector for phenols was compared with that of the UV detector in the analysis of real samples. a. Determination of Phenols in River Water Grand River (Lansing, MI) water, collected downstream from a coal driven power plant, was analyzed for the presence of phenols. No phenols were detected. The sample was then spiked with 1.9 ppm phenol, 2.2 ppm o-cresol, 2.4 ppm 3,5-dimethylphenol and 2.2 ppm resorcinol. The detector responses, both prior to (UV) and following derivatization (PCR) are shown in Figure 3.16. The chromatographed peaks were barely discernible by UV detection but clearly distinguishable by PCR detection despite the sensitivity of the former being set at a lower scale than the latter. The .figure clearly demonstrates the increased sensitivity obtained when using post-column derivatization. The diazo coupling reaction is an electrophilic aromatic substitution reaction. Thus, the aromatic compounds that are most likely to undergo this reaction would be those with a strongly activating substituent such as phenols and aromatic amines. The class selectivity of the PCR detector is demonstrated by the chromatogram shown in Figure 3.17 where the UV and PCR responses are compared for a water uv 1 2 1.00m; 3 4 . 2 I PCR 3 IDIAU 4 f I r I I I I I I I O I ' 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 TIME (MIN) Figure 3.16. Comparison of UV and PCR detection for the separation of phenols in a spiked river water sample ( Grand River, East Lansing, Michigan). 1.) resorcinol. 2.2 ppm 2.) phenol, 1.9 ppm 3. o-cresol, 2.2 ppm 4.) 3,5-dimethylphenol, 2.4 ppm. HPLC: Spherisorb ODS column; acetonitrile/water (50:50) mobile phase; flow rate of 1.0 ml/min; UV detection at 254 nm; 0.04 AUFS. PCR: manifold as shown in Figure 3.2; detection at 450 nm; 0.10 AUFS. I 2 I004 AU W 3 4 I PCR 3 IJ AU 4 TIME (MIN) Figure 3.17. Comparison of selectivity of UV and PCR detection for phenols in a spiked river water sample. 1.) phenol, 18.8 ppm 2.) aniline, 19.6 ppm 3.) o-cresol, 21.6 ppm 4.) 3,5-dimethylphenol, 24.4 ppm. HPLC: Spherisorb ODS column; acetonitrile/water (50:50) mobile phase; flow rate of 1.0 ml/min; UV detection at 254 nm; 0.04 AUFS. PCR: manifold as shown in Figure 3.2; detection at 460 nm; 1.0 AUFS. 82 sample that had been spiked with phenol, aniline, o-cresol and 3,5- dimethylphenol. UV detection of the chromatographed sample showed the presence of all four compounds, with aniline as a major peak. The PCR detector showed only three peaks which corresponded to the phenols. This is a result of the different optimum reaction conditions needed for DSA coupling to phenol and to aromatic amines. It may be observed in Figures 3.16 and 3.17, that the column void volume peak was not present in the PCR detector trace. This is due to the toroidal flow within each liquid segment that is characteristic of air- segmented flow streams. The result is enhanced mixing which leads to homogeneity within each liquid segment. b. Phenols Determination in Residual Fuel Oil A residual fuel oil sample was separated into fractions of different functional group types by sequential elution solvent chromatography. The fraction containing phenols was chromatographed under isocratic conditions with a 50:50 acetonitrile:water mobile phase. A series of peaks were observed in the UV trace as shown in Figure 3.18. Only two peaks were evident in the PCR detector recording. These peaks have been tentatively identified by retention times and spiking experiments to be phenol and a cresol. Figure 3.19 shows the responses obtained when the sample was spiked with 90 ppm and 400 ppm phenol. At the lower concentration, there is no measureable change in relative peak heights (ratio of phenol containing peak, peak b, to peak a on the chromatogram) for the UV detector response, whereas an 11 fold increase is observed in the PCR trace. When the sample was spiked with 400 ppm phenol, a two fold increase in the relative peak height is 83 0 UV _L l l l L l l l l l O | 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 TIME (MIN) Figure 3.18. Reverse phase separation of RFC, fraction #7. HPLC: Spherisorb ODS column; acetonitrile/water (50:50) mobile phase; flow rate of 1.0 ml/min; UV detection at 254 nm; 0.64 AUFS. PCR: manifold as shown in Figure 3.2; detection at 450 nm; 1.0 AUFS. 84 i JL’; ) V—~ PCR Figure 3.19. Chromatogram of RFC, fraction #7, spiked with a.) 90 ppm phenol b.) 400 ppm phenol. observed in the UV trace and a 46 fold increase is obtained for the PCR response. This further demonstrates the greater sensitivity of the PCR detector over the UV detector. In the identification of cresol by spiking, the sample was diluted 20 times and the resultant solution spiked with 32 ppm o-cresol. The detector responses are shown in Figure 3.20. From the change in relative peak heights (UV) and the corresponding changes in the PCR response, it was apparent that other compounds were coeluting with phenol and o-cresol and were not detected by the derivatization detector. D. Conclusions The advantages of using post-column derivatization in HPLC are apparent. The gain in selectivity and sensitivity have been demonstrated with applications to phenols determination in water and fuel samples. The latter application also shows that a potentially complicated separation may be greatly simplified by using a detector of this type. In addition, the advantages of using air-segmented continuous flow analysis such as minimized band broadening due to longitudinal dispersion in the PCR detector and enhanced mixing within ' each liquid segment have been illustrated. Other positive points, particular to this system, include on-line detection and compatibility between the separation and reaction systems with respect to flow rates and varying acetonitrile/water mobile phase composition. Post—column reaction detection of phenol derivatives formed from the diazo coupling reaction with sulfanilic acid does have its limitations, however. The first of these disadvantages is dilution, which is inherent I .032 AUFS [W‘— I .OI AUFS W Figure 3.20. Chromatogram of RFC fraction #7 diluted 20x and spiked with 32 ppm o-cresol. 87 to PCR detector systems that involve the addition of reagents to the column effluent. Therefore, the volume of reagents added should be kept to a minimum. A second limitation is that the diazo coupling does not occur for all phenols and therefore, cannot be used for the determination of total phenols. As with other colorimetric reactions for phenols that involve electrophilic aromatic substitution, in general no reactions occur for phenols containing electron withdrawing groups. Phenols with substituents occupying both the ortho and para positions to the hydroxyl group also yield no response to this reaction as the positions at which electrophilic aromatic substitutions would take place are blocked. This lack of response from all phenols may be regarded as a disadvantage or an advantage depending on the desired information. A survey of the reactivity of 126 phenols to diazotized sulfanilic acid, as measured by the presence of a measureable absorbance, was reported by Koppe et al. (119). In general, this work provides a good guide to the types of phenols that undergo this reaction. However, detectable responses have been obtained in our laboratory for some phenols that have been listed by Koppe et al. as having no responses is. 2,4-dichlorophenol and p-tert-butylphenol. This may be a result of the reaction conditions that were used by Koppe et al. being different from that employed by us e.g., NaOI-I was added to obtain a basic solution. As previously noted, the buffering systems are not inert. CHAPTER IV THE DEVELOPMENT OF RECYCLE HEARTCUT CHROMATOGRAPHY (REC) FOR ANALYSES IN COMPLEX SAMPLE MATRICES A. INTRODUCTION The development of a new valve switching technique, which we call recycle heartcut chromatography (RHC), is described. Preliminary results are presented that characterize the REC system. Several potential applications are explored. The method of recycle heartcut chromatography involves the repetitive isolation of specific components and the recycling of these components through the column for an improved separation. The HPLC components used to implement RI-IC are shown in Figure 4.1. In addition to the two six port valves, the system consists of a single detector, a pump and one column. The recycled sample does not flow through the pump so that the problem of peak dispersion in the pump cavity is not observed. Such dispersion is encountered in the direct pumping approach to recycle chromatography. The use of the same column for recycling eliminates any complications that may arise from employing more than one column as with the alternate pumping principle. Such complications originate from variations in column characteristics. 89 .hsnsshodsaeso 33.30: 20.30.— .anoaam 3 pee: canvas—amass ‘52.; use Seash- oan :3. 0.53m _:o>. omom EoZom _. _ m m .o _ , w m MWW=_ kartam uouooaoo vllllllt c5330 90 The valve switching sequence used in RHC is demonstrated in Figure 4.2. When the sample is first injected, valves 1 and 2 are both in the counterclockwise (COW) position as shown in Figure 4.2a. The column effluent is directed to waste until the desired fraction begins to elute. At this point, valve 2 switches clockwise (CW) (Figure 4.2b) to divert this fraction to a heartcut loop that is made from stainless steel tubing. After an appropriate delay, valve 2 switches back counterclockwise (Figure 4.2c) to allow the column to flush. Figure 4.2d shows the final stage when valve 1 is turned clockwise to divert the mobile phase flow through the heartcut loop and sweep its contents onto the head of the column. This valve switching sequence is repeated in order to obtain a 'cleaner’ and more resolved fraction with each recycle. There are a number of advantages that arise from the positioning of the detector in this configuration. First, only one detector is needed to monitor the column effluent continuously. The detector output can be used to trigger a valve switch, as discussed in a later section. Third, a high pressure flow cell is not needed because one end of the detector is always connected to ambient air. In the following sections, the instrumentation used in RHC is described. The methods used to trigger valve switchings are illustrated. The various contributions to band broadening are discussed for the specific heartcut loops that were used in this work. Finally, some applications of EEO are presented. 91 a.) Waste Pump b .) Uoslc Pump c.) Waste Pump do) Waste Pump Figure 4.2. Valve switching sequence employed in REC, a.) start-up b.) heartcut c.) column flush and d.) recycle heartcut. 92 B. EXPERIMENTAL 1. Instrumentation The description of the instrumentation used to implement RHC is divided into two sections. First, details are given of the HPLC apparatus that was employed. This is followed by a discussion of the role of the microcomputer in experiment control. a. HPLC Apparatus A block diagram of the apparatus employed for recycle heartcut chromatography is shown in Figure 4.1. The HPLC system is assembled from a Spectraphysics SP8700 ternary solvent delivery system (Santa Clara, CA) with a 280 microprocessor, a Rheodyne 7120 injection valve (Cotati, CA) with a 20 111 sample loop, a 4.6 mm x 25 cm Zorbax ODS column (Dupont, Wilmington, DE), a Chromatronix 220 UV absorbance detector (Berkeley, CA) and two Rheodyne valves (7010 and 7040) with pneumatic actuators for diverting the solvent flow stream along various paths. The pneumatic actuators are operated by 2-port and 2-position solenoid valves (Scovill Corporation, Wake Forest, NC) which direct the flow of air or nitrogen to either side of the actuator piston. The gas pressure (50 psi) provides the driving force that turns the valves. For details on the circuitry employed, the reader is referred to the original work (197). 93 b. Microcomputer Controlled HPLC System The HPLC system is controlled by an Intel 8085 based microcomputer that was built in our laboratory (197). As shown in Figure 4.3, the microcomputer can be used to control the pump, the chart recorder drive and the valve switchings as well as to facilitate a number of other functions. Communication between the pump and the microcomputer is achieved through the use of a keypad emulator (198) which allows the computer to simulate a keystroke on the keypad of the SP8700 solvent delivery system. This set-up enables the option of a synchronized separation and data acquisition scheme consisting of changing separation conditions as well as valve switchings and data acquisition based on the same time clock. The AM9513 timer (Advanced Micro Devices), used for this purpose, is installed as part of the microcomputer system. Data taken by the microcomputer are stored and processed with a DEC L81 11/23 minicomputer. The chromatogram is displayed on a chart recorder which may also be placed under microcomputer control. The valves are switched as directed by the TTL signal sent by the microcomputer to an optically isolated relay that is connected to the solenoid valve. Valve positions are sensed by the microcomputer via the absence or presence of a current through a reed switch that is mounted on the valve housing. A magnet mounted on the valve shaft causes the switch contacts to close as it moves near the switch when the valve is turned clockwise. The state of this reed switch, sensed by the microcomputer, enables it to determine the position of the valve and whether the valve turning had been successfully carried out. 94 used in REC. DEC LSl 11/23 KEYPAD SP8700 EMULATOR muncoupures zao MICRO- SOLVENT PROCESSOR RESERVOIRS J TERNARY INTEL 3035 PROPORTIONING MICROCOMP T ' PUMP VALVE U ER W 8255 ARV“) PIO . y U — lNJECTOR AM9513 VALVE J, 1"ng CONTROL "'7 43-0 l ; ti \/ ' A0558 A0574 : o-o I DAC ADC """l obj CHART UV RECORDER DETECTOR Figure 4.3. Block diagram of microcomputer controlled HPLC system 95 This system, aside from the initial sample injection, is completely automated. Its construction also allows for the manual control of each of the functions mentioned above. 2. Software The software developed by P. M. Wiegand (197) employed polyFORTH as the operating language at the microcomputer level. FORTH is a threaded language that allows a new word to be defined either by stringing together existing words or by building the word from the basic kernal commands. A single word may be used to carry out a complex sequence of events which makes this language particularly suitable for instrument control. In addition, the FORTH routines are easy to read, write and alter. An example of a FORTH routine that is used to take a cut when a'specific peak is sensed and to recycle it is shown in Figure 4.4. When the command " lCUT " is entered, the following events take place: 1.) Valves 1 and 2 are turned counterclockwise (CCW). 2.) When the mobile phase flow has stabilized, a message is displayed on the terminal prompting the operator to inject a sample. 3.) When the sample is injected, the microcomputer clock starts timing and the recorder chart drive is turned on. 4.) At 2 min 30 s, the data acquisition and peak counting routines are initiated. 5.) When the peak count = 1, valve 2 is switched CW for a heartcut. 6.) After a 12 s delay, valve 2 is turned CCW to allow the column to flush. ' 7.) At 4 min 30 s, valve 1 is turned CW and the heartcut is recycled. _ 8.) At 8 min 30 s, the message " END OF RUN " is displayed on the terminal. 9.) The pump, chart drive and peak finding and data taking routines are ended. 96 Block Number: 85 0 (One cut) 2 lCUT 1 CCW 2 CCW FLOW? ." FLOW IS READY, INJECT SAMPLE." INJECT DIGREC ON 2 30 EVENT TAKEDATA Z#PEAKS ?PEAK BEGIN 0 RFLAG C! PAUSE #PEAKS O 1 2 END 2 CW 1200 WAIT 2 CCW 4 30 EVENT 1 CW 8 30 EVENT ." END OF RUN." STP PRESS OFF ISTOP 4STOP ENDDATA ; Figure 4.4. An example of a FORTH block used to take a heartcut based on peak count which is then recycled through the column. 97 3. Solution and Sample Preparation Polyaromatic hydrocarbons were purchased from Chem Service (West Chester, PA). Steroids were obtained from Steraloids, Inc. (Wilton, NH). All solutions were filtered through a 0.45 pm filter prior to injection into the HPLC system. Urine samples were pretreated using a Cu Sep-Pak cartridge (Waters Associates, Milford, MA) which had been prewetted with 2 ml of methanol followed by 5 ml of water. The cartridge was then charged with 20 ml of urine and washed with 5 ml of water to remove salts. A 3 ml amount of methanol was used to elute the organic components off the cartridge. This fraction was collected and spiked with 10 uM of 1,4 androstadiene-3,17-dione. As a final step, the urine samples were filtered through a 0.45 pm filter. Spectral grade HPLC solvents (Burdick and Jackson, Muskegon, M1) were filtered through a 0.45 pm filter and degassed with helium prior to use. C. Evaluation of the RHC System 1. Reproducibility of Valve Switchings The microcomputer software has been developed so as to allow valve actuation to be initiated based on the fulfillment of a variety of conditions. These conditions are peak number, detector threshold and time. Heartcuts that are initiated by the first two methods are referred to as detector-based cuts since the detector output is monitored to 98 determine whether the conditions for a heartcut are met. Excerpts of FORTH routines used to implement valve switchings in the determination of valve switching precision are listed in Figure 4.5. The first case, Figure 4.5a, is set up to count the number of peaks, with instructions to turn valve 2 CW for a heartcut when the first peak is sensed. Valve actuation can also be initiated by setting a threshold based on detector output as shown in the Figure 4.5b. In this example, a cut is taken when the detector response has reached 10% of the full scale value. The third type of heartcut is one that is based on the time after injection. As demonstrated by the third case, Figure 4.5c, this is accomplished by specifying a time (e.g. 4 min 30 s). The reproducibility of the valve switchings was determined by injections of a 300 ”M naphthalene solution followed by a 12 s heartcut that corresponds to a 200 pl volume. This heartcut was sent back through the column, and the peak height of the recycled- peak was recorded for use in precision calculations. The mobile phase was 100% methanol at a flow rate of 1.0 ml/min. The detector was set at 0.16 absorbance units full scale (AUFS). Table 4.1 lists the peak height measurements made for the first and second cycles through the column. The percent relative standard deviation (%RSD) was calculated from the ratio of peak heights of cycle 2 to that of cycle I to eliminate the contribution from injection inconsistencies. Ideally, the sample should be injected as a sharp plug. However, mixing of the sample and mobile phase can occur due to imperfect injector design, badly made connectors and poor injection technique. Any of these factors could lead to a variation in peak height. 99 a. 2 30 EVENT TAKEDATA Z#PEAKS ?PEAK BEGIN 0 RFLAG C! PAUSE #PEAKS 0 l = END 2 CW b. 2 30 EVENT TAKEDATA 10 XFSCHG 2 CW 6. 2 3O EVENT TAKEDATA 4 30 EVENT 2 CW Figure 4.5. Examples of FORTH commands used to initiate valve actuations by a.) peak count b.) threshold and 0.) time after injection. 100 Table 4.1. Determining the precision of valve switchings triggered by peak count, detector threshold (10% full scale) and time. Peak Height Relative peak )4 R80 (A/D units) height Cycle 1 Cycle 2 Peak Count 792 304 .384 849 311 .366 829 325 .392 4.54 825 318 .385 819 340 .415 Detector Threshold 824 483 .586 830 475 .572_ 809 501 .619 3.23 821 496 .604 818 501 .612 'Phne 840 423 .504 840 448 .533 830 373 .449 7.25 868 428 .493 875 397 .454 101 The retention time, R3, of a compound can differ from day to day as a result of small fluctuations in separation conditions such as temperature and flow rate. Over an extended length of time, these variations may arise from the deterioration of the analytical column. Regardless of the source, this change in R2 causes a different portion of the chromatogram to be isolated when time-based cuts are employed. This results in a variability of the peak height and area of the recycled peak. The advantage of detector-based heartcuts over time-based cute is evident. The variations in retention times do not affect the detector- based cuts as they do a time-based system. This is reflected by the XRSD values that are listed in Table 4.1 which shows better precision for detector-based cuts. Even though detector-based cuts are preferred, certain applications will require the use of time-based cuts. 2. Band Broadening in the 12110 System Band broadening is a crucial factor in RHC. Improvements in resolution may be lost if significant amounts of dispersion are introduced in recycling the heartcut. Band broadening can originate from components of the HPLC system such as the injection valve, tubing, column, detector and any of the numerous connectors. In this section, the dispersion that occurs in the tubing used as the heartcut loop is described. The peak widths at half height of the recycled peak are compared when tubing of different dimensions are used. The feasibility of using a heartcut loop of larger volume than needed and of partially filling it is discussed. 102 A 450 pl! naphthalene solution was used in these studies. The mobile phase was 100% methanol and the flow rate employed was 1.0 ml/min. Time-based heartcuts were utilized throughout. a. Heartcut Loop Tubing Dimensions The heartcut loops were made from stainless steel tubes of various lengths and internal diameters (i.d.). A cut of the eluting naphthalene peak was diverted into the heartcut loop. This cut was then recycled through the column, and the peak width at half height, wm, measured. The values for win for both the first and second cycle through the column are summarized in Table 4.2. Note that tripling the length of the 0.01" i.d. tube (cases 1 and 3) produces a 15% increase in HUI whereas tripling the length of the 0.02" i.d. tube (cases 4 and 5) produces a 65% increase. Equal volume cuts with the two different i.d. tubes (cases 2 and 4) yield approximately equal win values. This leads to the conclusion that long lengths of 0.02" i.d. tubing should not be used as the heartcut loop. This is confirmed when the win values of the recycled peaks are compared for the cases in which long lengths of the two tubes are used (cases 3 and 5). The 0.02" i.d. tube yields a recycled peak width that is 60% higher than that obtained for the 0.01" i.d. tubing. Therefore, if large volume cuts need to be made, the 0.01" tubing should be employed. The trends observed between peak width and tubing dimensions are as expected. The degree of band broadening in tubing is directly 103 Tabls4.2.Effectoftubingdi-ensbnsonthepeskwidthathalf heighgwm, ofarecycledpssk. I _—T “J i r Heartcut Tubing Dimensions wm (i 0.03 cm) Length i.d. Volume Cycle 1 Cycle 2 (cm) (in) (m1) (cm) (cm) 60 0.01 34.0 2.45 2.20 72 0.01 38.8 2.45 2.19 183 0.01 92.6 2.45 2.49 18 0.02 36.8 2.45 2.32 60 0.02 121.6 2.45 3.93 104 proportional to the tube length and proportional to the fourth power of the tube radius as expressed in the equation derived by Scott and Kucera (199). 6.53 = 11 r‘ 1 Equation 4.1 nm.....m.—nh....—... The symbols in the above equation denote the following: up is the standard deviation of the Gaussian peak that represents band broadening due to the tubing (8), r is the internal radius of the tubing (cm), 1 is the length of the tubing (cm), D. is the diffusitivity of the solute in the mobile phase (cma/s) and Q is the flow rate of the mobile phase (cm3/s). A second expression, Equation 4.2, can be derived to calculate the relative amount of band broadening introduced by heartcut loops made from tubes of different lengths and diameters. This equation assumes identical separation conditions for the cases being compared. (£1923 ...... = {£3.23 ...... 13 .. Equation 4-2 The calculated and experimental values for band broadening are compared in Table 4.3. The calculated values were higher than those obtained experimentally. A possible explanation for this observation lies in the necessary coiling of the long lengths of tubing used as the heartcut loop. In continuous flow analysis systems, coiling a piece of tubing will result in a smaller amount of dispersion than that observed for the same length of straight tubing (87). 105 Tabls4.3.Compsrisonofthecslculstsdandexperi-sntslbsnd brosdeningintubingdvsrisusdi-nsions. t -' -— I L J Hesrtcut Tubing Dimensions % Band Brosdeningt Length i.d. Calculated Experimental (cm) (in) 60 0.01 0 0 72 0.01 110 0 183 0.01 170 113 18 0.02 220 106 60 0.02 400 179 _ ‘— 8 calculated relative to values obtained for the case of 60 cm x 0.01" i.d. 106 b. Partial Filling of the Heartcut Loop With the configuration described above, the heartcut volume is fixed and determined by the dimensions of the tubing used as the heartcut loop. One method that would allow different heartcut volumes and increase the flexibility of the system is to use a large volume heartcut loop which is only partially filled. Studies were performed to determine whether this approach would be analytically useful. Two pieces of tubing, 0.01" i.d. x 60 cm and 0.02" i.d. x 60 cm, were used as heartcut loops. A 450 uM naphthalene solution was injected and cuts of different sizes (Figures 4.6 and 4.7) were taken so as to fill the loop to various extents. The peaks resulting from recycling the partial loop fills of two heartcut loops are shown in Figures 4.8 and 4.9. The same behaviour was observed for both the 0.01" and 0.02" i.d. loops. First, the peak maximum occurs at a progressively longer time as the percentage of the loop volume that is used, Vmp, decreases. In partially filling the heartcut loop, the sample displaces the mobile phase present in the loop beginning with the section that is closest to the column outlet. The remaining portion of the loop that is not occupied by sample (i.e., the side attached to the column inlet) remains filled with mobile phase. The distance between the center of the heartcut sample plug and the column inlet increases when the percentage of the loop volume that is used, V1.69, decreases. This causes the small offset in retention times that is observed (Figures 4.8 and 4.9) when the heartcuts of different Vloop values are recycled. Second, a disproportionality is observed between peak height and Vmp, i.e., the peak height for the 50% loop fill is not half that of the 100% loop fill. The reason for this becomes clear when Figures 4.6 and 4.7 are 107 0.20 F 0.10 - Absorbance 0.05 - 175.0 195.0 215.0 235.0 Thne (s) Figure 4.6. Heartcuts taken to fill a 60 cm x 0.01" i.d. loop to various extents - 100% loop fill (--), 75% loop fill (~---), 50% loop fill (---) and 25% loop fill (-—). 450 1111 naphthalene with a 100% 08803 mobile phase and a 1.0 ml/min flow rate. Detection is at 254 nm and 0.16 AU full scale. 108 0.20 r- 0.15 - 0.10 - Absorbance 0.05 - ssess-eeaeessesI-sss- essesseseessIssslslease-es-susssseeseseeeseeslessee-ease ------------------ 0.00 - 175.0 l 1 1 215.0 235.0 Thne (s) Figure 4.7. Heartcuts taken to fill a 60 cm x 0.02" i.d. loop to various extents - 100% loop fill (---), 75% loop fill (um), 50% loop fill (---) and 25% loop fill (—). 450 mM naphthalene with a 100% 03808 mobile phase and a 1.0 Isl/min flow rate. Detection is at 254 nm and 0.18 All full scale. 109 0.05 , , , i L ' XV 0.04 h 1 - 10.0,.” ‘ . 2 2 - 75 * 3 3 - 50. g 0.03 " 4 - 25 .‘ _ .0 .. 3 3 h 0.02 - '9 . V 0.01 " . 4 0000 :Zx'r’-'“..“- I l , \\"‘..’ " ‘A‘- -‘ W;-‘_«_‘ 1%- 440.0 460.0 480.0 500.0 Time (s) Figure 4.8. Chromatograms of the recycled peaks that resulted from the partial filling of the heartcut loop ( 60cm x 0.01" i.d.). 110 007 1 . . 006 0.05 0.04 0.03 Absorbance Figure 4.9. Chromatograms of the recycled peaks that resulted from the partial filling of the heartcut loop ( 60cm x 0.02" i.d.). 111 reexamined. The cuts were taken on the slope of the peak. Thus, the amount of sample within each heartcut is not proportional to the volume of the cut. Third, the 181/: values of peaks that result from recycling heartcuts of different volumes that partially filled a tube are approximately equal for each tube. The ma values of the recycled peaks in the cases where tubes of different i.d.s are filled to various extents are summarized in Table 4.4. In the case of no sample dispersion, the expected result is a decreasing wm value from 100% V1... to 25% Vleep for each piece of tubing. The fact that the values for win listed within each set of peaks are not significantly different indicates that dispersion is taking place. Work needs to be done to determine whether this dispersion is occurring predominantly in the heartcut loop or in other parts of the separation system. Despite the dispersion, the plots show that partial loop fills are a feasible alternative. D. Applications Preliminary experimental work on the application of RHC to various problems has been carried out. The following discussion illustrates the experimental approach used in RHC and shows the potential of the technique. 112 Table 4.4. Values d peak width at half height, win, of recycledheartcutsthatpartiallyfillsdtubescf different i.d.s to varying extents. ‘j: J V1... (WI/3)“! (wmlm (X) (cm) (cm) 100 1.29 2.28 75 1.29 2.25 50 1.27 2.20 25 1.27 2.20 113 1. Component(s) Isolation There are numerous instances in which the purpose of the analysis is to verify the presence of specific compounds and to provide quantitative information about them. Examples of such cases are the testing of body fluids for specific drug metabolites and the analysis of. body fluids and tissue for certain chemicals that are produced by the body as a sign of disease. In both cases, the sample matrices are very complex. One way to address this type of analysis is to extensively pretrsat the sample with hopes of removing all possible interferences before subjecting the sample to a final analytical separation. The complication often encountered is the presence of interferences which have not been removed in the sample pretreatment step because of their similar chemical and physical characteristics to the compounds of interest. An intricate and time consuming separation scheme may have to be used to circumvent this problem. An alternative method of analysis is to continuously isolate and separate the compounds of interest from the matrix. This can be accomplished with recycle heartcut chromatography. Only minimal amounts of pretreatment are needed prior to injection into the HPLC system. The heartcut step provides any further fraction isolation that may be necessary. The recycling step should provide an increase in the number of theoretical plates and thus, improved resolution. The analysis of a urine sample for the steroid, 1,4-androstadisns- 3,7-dions, is illustrated in Figure 4.10. The term, cycle 1, is used when referring to the first pass through the column and cycle 2, when referring to the second pass. The portion of the chromatogram 114 0.072 -1 0054' CYCLE I 0.056‘ 0.048‘ 0.040“ ABSORBANCE 0932‘ * CYCLE 2 0.024‘ 0.016‘ 0.008“ 0 2.0 410 6T0 810 10.0 12.0 14.0 TIME (min) Figure 4.10. Isolation of 1,4-androstadiene-3,17-dione from a spiked urine sample. Separation conditions: mobile phase is 85/15 CHaOH/HaO: flow rate is 1.0 ml/min. Heartcut is time-based and for a volume of 100 pl. 115 corresponding to cycle 1, shows the elution of a number of compounds, some of which are unresolved. The heartcut that was taken is denoted by the dotted lines shown in Figure 4.10. The position of this heartcut was based on the retention time of a previously injected steroid standard. The chromatogram for cycle 2 shows a baseline disturbance due to the solvent front at 12 min and the isolated steroid component eluting at 13 min 10 s (indicated by arrow). The single peak obtained does not show any indication of other components being present. In this example, a minimum amount of sample pretreatment (e.g. the urine was passed through a Sep-Pak cartridge as described in the experimental section) and an isocratic separation (85/15 CHaOH/H20) were employed in the isolation of a specific compound present in a complex matrix. These are some of the advantages that are offered by RHC. The technique of recycle heartcut chromatography also has many potential uses in the area of preparative liquid chromatography. The analytical column can be replaced by a preparative LC column with only minor modifications to the separation system. Since such a column was not available, an analytical column was used instead in the demonstration of potential applications in this area. RHC can be used either to remove a contaminant present in a final product or to isolate a desired component. An example of the latter case is demonstrated in Figure 4.11. A mixture of polynuclesr aromatic hydrocarbons is partially separated as shown in the cycle 1 portion of the chromatogram. .' The desired compound is naphthalene which corresponds to the peak eluted at 210 s. A heartcut was taken of this peak as denoted by the lines drawn in cycle 1 and the elution of the recycled sample is shown in 116 I l f r 0.7 - 0 Cycle 1 1 0.00 "' fi‘ - O 1. o 0.50 _ § 0.00 I. —1 e Cycle 2 8 0.30 b _ Q ‘ 0.20 +- .. 0.10 1- .. 0.00 1 - ._ 1 20.0 220.0 320.0 420.0 520.0 Tim 9 (s) Figure 4.11. Isolation of naphthalene from a mixture of polynuclesr aromatic hydrocarbons consisting of naphthalene, biphenyl and phenanthrene. Separation conditions: mobile phase 90/ 10 ethos/11.0; flow rate is 1.0 m1/min. 117 cycle 2. The heartcut step has been used, in this example, as a fractionation step to expedite the isolation of a single component that is surrounded by closely eluting impurities. Note that the column has been somewhat overloaded to demonstrate a practice commonly employed in preparative work to maximize the amount of purified sample per unit time (especially when the desired compound is a minor component). 2. Verification of Peak Purity The potential of employing RHC as a verification technique fer chemicals listed as ‘chromatographically pure’ is demonstrated in Figure 4.12. The chemical system that was employed is a model mixture of biphenyl and naphthalene. The chromatogram that results from the first pass through the column, Figure 4.12s, shows a peak with a shoulder. A 430 pl cut is made, as shown by the dotted lines, and recycled through the column to obtain the chromatogram shown in Figure 4.12b. This step is repeated and the chromatogram that resulted from this second recycle is illustrated in Figure 4.12c. With the second recycle, it is clear that the suspect peak consisted of more than one component. The resolution of the two sample bands can be estimated via a visual' comparison with the set of standard resolution curves for different band-size ratios that have been introduced by Snyder (200). A small increase in resolution (0.5 to 0.6) is observed after two recycles. The final resolution is lower than the expected value of 0.85. (Resolution, as defined by Equation 1.1, is proportional to the square root of the number of theoretical plates, N. If the sample is cycled through the column three times, there would be a three fold increase in N, assuming 4590.33 5 2 .12 s 56 use 0:035:93. 5 I 73 u m4 3 e—naem .n 3050 «.0 use N 0350 A;— — e—uho fie 32:.— xeen no 90335.33, .Nui ensur— 118 «a» 65.: g. .80 .8. .08 g .005 .85 d a d d d . eQe V. a. s e - 86 W a u a s 1 «9e b p p 8.0 A e U «a» 2:2 «my 2:2 .85 98 93 .93 69" as. 934 .98. 69" as» gas .9x .93 q q q 11 4 d E 1 d d u . 1 I 1 8.0 1 8.0 1 . m L 86 T 1.ee e a 1 w 1 86 A e w «90 w 1 0 1 no.0 r 1.66 149° F b h h F 36° A O a b b b h! b 80° sausqaesqy Tm 119 that N is additive. Resolution should then increase by a factor of (3)1” or 1.7.). This smaller gain in resolution can be attributed to void volumes in the RHC system or the use of poorly designed HPLC components that cause mixing of the partially separated sample. In the worst case, any separation that has been achieved by the first pass through the column is lost. The sample that is recycled is then equivalent to the homogeneous sample plug that was initially injected; thus no improvement in resolution will be observed with each recycle. Further studies need to be done to locate the major sources of dispersion in the REC system. 3. Quantitative RHC The feasibilty of employing RHC as a quantitative technique was investigated by plotting calibration curves for naphthalene standards that had undergone a series of two heartcuts. The two successive heartcuts were taken at 10% detector full scale and were 234 pl in volume. Figure 4.13 demonstrates the calibration curves obtained when the absorbsnce at maximum peak height for each of the three cycles and each standard was plotted. Linearity was observed for all three cases. The statistics related to each calibration curve are summarized in Table 4.5. A problem that is inherent to the technique of RHC becomes evident with this data. With each recycle, the sample becomes more diluted by the mobile phase and with each heartcut, a smaller portion of the peak is taken. This results in a decrease in the slope of the calibration curves and thus, a decrease in sensitivity from cycle 1 to 120 _ O — Cycle 1 A — Cycle 2 0.8 _ Cl — Cycle 3 _ r 8 c 0.6 +- - D Q . g 8 Q 0.4 "' "‘ V 0.2 r . - 0.0 1 . ll 1‘ l 1 L 1 150.0 250.0 350.0 . 450.0 550.0 Concentration (,aM) Figure 4.13. Calibration curves for naphthalene standards of which two heartcuts have been taken and recycled. 121 Table 4.5. linear regressbn analysis of calibration curves for quantitative RHC. - Cycle 1 Cycle 2 Cycle 3 Slope 1.7 x 10" 1.0 x 10" 6.9 x 10" Std. error 0.0001 0.0003 0.0004 of estimate Correlation .9992 .9914 .9822 coefficient y-intercept -0.002 -0.016 -0.005 122 cycle 3. The observed increase in the standard error of the estimate is a manifestation of the decrease in S/N ratio with each heartcut. E. Conclusions An automated HPLC system which integrates a heartcut step for fraction isolation with a recycling step for increasing the separation efficiency has been described. The performance of this recycle heartcut chromatography system has been evaluated with respect to the precision of the various methods that can be used to initiate a heartcut. The method of partially filling a large heartcut loop to provide a more flexible system was examined and determined to be a viable alternative. The versatility and advantages of RHC were demonstrated with a number of general applications. First, in the analysis of complex mixtures for specific compounds, it was shown that an extensive pretreatment of the sample prior to introduction to the HPLC was not necessary. Nor was it essential to employ an intricate separation scheme. Second, the fraction isolation capabilities of RHC make its extension to preparative LC a logical move. This system would be capable of isolating fractions of very high purity. The gain in purity with each heartcut will be offset by the loss of sample. A balance between the two factors will have to be established for each specific case. Third, RHC can be used as a quantitative technique. In addition to the advantages mentioned above, the RHC system is simple and easy to implement as most of the components needed are standard accessories used in liquid chromatography. The automated features are desirable, but not essential for all applications. The cost 123 of an RHC system is minimal as only one pump, one column, one detector with a low pressure flow cell and two valves are needed. (The first three components are readily available in most laboratories that routinely utilize liquid chromatography.) It should also be mentioned that even though RHC has been discussed in this work as pertaining to HPLC, this valve configuration may be extended with ease to other liquid chromatographic techniques. The RHC system has its limitations, a major one being the loss of sensitivity with each recycle, due to a smaller fraction of the initial sample plug being used and dilution by the mobile phase. This problem could be somewhat alleviated with the use of gradient elution. A gradient can be employed either in the last recycle to sharpen the final peaks or in each recycle to compress the broadened peaks back to the same volume as the peak that resulted from the first pass through the column. Using this approach, there should be a minimal ‘loss of the desired component with each recycled heartcut. A second problem that has been encountered is band broadening in the system. As a result, the expected gain in resolution has not been achieved. As mentioned earlier, work needs to be done to determine the major source of dispersion and if possible, to remedy it. In this chapter, some preliminary results obtained using recycle heartcut chromatography have been presented. Further work also needs to be done to characterize and investigate the advantages and limitations of the method. In particular, the trade-off between resolution enhancement and decreased S/N ratios should be studied. CHAPTER V FUTURE PROSPECTIVES A. OVERVIEW The recent developments in post-column reaction detectors have enabled the use of this type of detector in conjunction with a variety of different techniques (e.g., miniaturization of PCR systems which has led to the first work with microbore columns (201)). There is still room for growth, both in the applications area and the development of improved manifold components and instrumentation. The preceding statement also applies to the area of recycle heartcut chromatography. B. POST-COLUMN REACTION DETECTORS 1. Tandem Analyses Even though most of the reactions that have been used with PCR detectors are very selective, often more than one class of compounds is able to react. The reaction conditions can be used to favor the reaction of one class of compounds over another, thus providing an additional degree of selectivity. It is Conceivable to develop a detector system that would employ a change of reaction conditions after the first set of compounds has been detected to favor reaction with a second set of 124 125 compounds. In this way, a tandem analysis of different compounds could be carried out. A specific example is the formation of azo dyes which, for phenols, take place in basic media, but for anilines, under acidic conditions. If the reaction medium was initially alkaline, phenols would undergo the coupling reaction with the diazonium reagent. After the absorbance of the phenol derivative formed is measured, acid is added to the flow stream and aniline would be able to react with the diazonium reagent. The absorbance of the aniline derivatives would then be measured on a second detector. It should be noted that in a tandem analysis, different detection principles could be employed. 2. Solvent Segmen tation The use of solvent segmentation as the post-column reaction system provides a powerful and flexible detector. As discussed earlier, advantages of segmentation with solvents over that. with air include reduced sample interaction and background noise. The use of the solvent segment as an extraction medium imparts an additional degree of selectivity to the reaction detector. The possibility of choosing an optimum solvent with respect to viscosity, solubility and spectral characteristics is another factor that makes this system very versatile. In order for this system to reach its full potential, the behaviour of sample and solvent molecules and the flow dynamics in a solvent segmentation have to be well understood. There is a need for such investigations. The extent to which the band broadening equations that have been developed for air segmentation can be used in predicting the dispersion in a solvent segmented system remains to be determined. 126 Also needed, is the derivation of equations that can be used to calculate the extraction efficiency between solvent segments in a flow stream. This should then lead to a study of the effects of ceiling on dispersion and extraction efficiencies. 3. Biological Detectors Solid phase reactors have recently been introduced in PCR systems. This was a natural progression because of the existing methodology concerning immobilization of reagents onto surfaces. In particular, the techniques for enzyme immobilization have been well researched (202,203). Enzymes are among the most selective reagents known. This degree of selectivity may be achieved through the use of reactors containing materials that are coated with biological reagents such as antibodies and proteins. These specific reaction detectors have many potential applications, especially with the present interest in biotechnology and the increasing number of syntheses of biological substances that need to be separated and detected. C. RECYCLE HEARTCUT CHROMATOGRAPHY Future research in recycle heartcut chromatography can take place in many areas. One possibility is the use of the commercially available multiport, multiposition valves for analyses that require multiple heartcuts to be taken. This system could also be employed in a similar fashion to boxcar chromatography. Samples could be continuously injected and the fraction of interest isolated and deposited 127 on the different heartcut loops. When all the heartcut loops are filled, sample injection is put on hold, and the fractions on the heartcut loops are recycled. The emptying out of each loop is spaced by a short time interval. The result would be a train of sample peaks, similar to that observed in boxcar chromatography. A second area would be in reducing dispersion in the heartcut loop. Long lengths of tubing are not recommended in HPLC because of the band broadening due to laminar flow. In flow injection analysis systems, single bead string reactors have been employed to break up the parabolic flow profile. The use of an equivalent system (to a single bead string reactor) in recycle heartcut chromatography could reduce the band broadening that occurs in the heartcut loops. Finally, the nature of the dispersion and diffusion in the heartcut loop require further investigation as that the full potential of recycle heartcut chromatography can be evaluated. Presently, computer simulations are being done (204) to clarify this aspect. LIST OF REFERENCES 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. LIST OF REFERENCES K. Blau and 6.8. King, "Handbook of Derivatives for Chromatography", Heyden, London (1977). C.F. Poole and A. Zlatkis, J. Chromatogr. Sci., 17, 115 (1979). J.F. Lawrence, in "Chemical Derivatization in Analytical Chemistry", Vol. 2, R.W. Frei and J.F. Lawrence Eds., Plenum Press, New York, 1982, Ch. 5. R.W. Frei, J. Chromatogr. Rev., 165, 75 (1979). S. Siggia and LG. Hanna, "Quantitative Organic Analysis via Functional Groups", John Wiley 8. Sons, Inc., New York, 1973. K.A. Connors, "Reaction Mechanisms in Organic Analytical Chemistry", John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, 1973. N.D. Cheronis, J.B. Entrikin and E.M. Hodnett, "Semimicro Qualitative Organic Chemistry", Robert E. Krieger Publishing Company, New York, Inc., Florida, 1983. . A.W. Wolkoff and R.H. Larose, J. Chromatogr., 99, 731 (1974). M. Frei-Hausler, R.W. Frei and O. Hutzinger, J. Chromatogr., 84, 214 (1973). W.P. King and P.T. Kissinger, Clin. Chem., 26, 1484 (1980). L.R. Snyder and J.J. Kirkland, "Introduction to Modern Liquid Chromatography", John Wiley 8 Sons, Inc., New York, 1979, p. 36. ibid., p. 50. ibid., p. 170. L.R. Snyder, J. Levine, R. Stay and A. Conetta, Anal. Chem., 48, 942A (1976). W.B. Furman, Ed., "Continuous Flow Analysis, Theory and Practice", Marcel Dekker, New York, 1976. L.R. Snyder, Anal. Chim. Acta, 114, 3 (1980). C.J. Patton, Ph.D. Thesis, Michigan State University, 1982. H.A. Mottola, Anal. Chem., 53, 1313A (1981). L.T. Skeggs, Jr., Clin. Chem., 2, 241 (1956). 128 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 250 26. 27. 28. 29. 30. 31. 32. 33. 34. 35. 36. 37. 38. 39. 40. 41. 129 LeTe Skeg‘sp Jre, Ame Jo Cline P801101" 28, 31]. (1957’s K.K. Stewart, G.R. Beecher and P.E. Hare, Fed. Proc., 33, 1439 (1974). J. Ruzicka and E.H. Hansen, Anal. Chim. Acta, 78, 145 (1975). J. Ruzicka and E.H. Hansen, "Flow Injection Analysis", John Wiley 8:. Sons, New York, 1981 and references therein. D. Betteridge, Anal. Chem., 50, 832A (1978). J.C. Ranger, Anal. Chem., 53, 20A (1981). J. Ruzicka and E.H. Hansen, Anal. Chim. Acta, 114, 19 (1980). J.T. Dobbins, Jr., and J.M. Martin, Spectroscopy, September, 20 (1986). B. Karlberg, in "Chemical Derivatization in Analytical Chemistry", Vol. 2, R.W. Frei and J.F. Lawrence, Eds., Plenum Press, New York, 1982, Ch. 1. M. Margoshes, Anal. Chem., 49, 17 (1977). J. Ruzicka, E.H. Hansen, M. Mosbaek and F.J. Krug, Anal. Chem., 49, 1858 (1977). M. Margoshes, Anal. Chem., 54, 678A (1982). B. Rocks and C. Riley, Clin. Chem., 28, 409 (1982). C.J. Patton and S.R. Crouch, Anal. Chim. Acta, 179, 189 (1986). C.J. Patton, Ph.D. Thesis, Michigan State University, 1982, p.36. L.R. Snyder and H.J. Adler, Anal. Chem., 48, 1017 (1976). L.R. Snyder and H.J. Adler, Anal. Chem., 48, 1022 (1976). L. Nord and B. Karlberg, Anal. Chim. Acta, 164, 233 (1984). L.R. Snyder, in "Advances in Automated Analysis, Technicon International Congress 1976", Vol. 1, Mediad, Inc., New York, p. 76. R.L. Habig, B.W. Schlein, L. Walters and R.E. Thiers, Clin. Chem., 15, 1045 (1969). W.E. Neeley, S. Wardlaw and M.E.T. Swinnen, Clin. Chem., 20, 78 (1974). W.E. Neeley, S.C. Wardlaw, T. Yates, W.G. Hollingsworth and M.E.T. Swinnen, Clin. Chem., 22, 227 (1976). 43. 44. 45. 46. 47. 48. 49. 50. 51. 52. 53. 54. 55. 56. 57. 58. 59. 60. 61. 62. 63. 64. 65. 130 C.J. Patton, M. Rabb and S.R. Crouch, Anal. Chem., 54, 1113 (1982). R.W. Frei, H. Jansen and U.A.Th. Brinkman, Anal. Chem., 57, 1529A (1985). H. Jansen, U.A.Th. Brinkman and R.W. Frei, J. Chromatogr. Sci., 23, 279 (1985). R.W. Frei, J. Chromatogr., 165, 75 (1979). R.W. Frei, L. Michel and W. Santi, J. Chromatogr., 142, 261 (1977). L.R. Snyder, J. Chromatogr., 125, 287 (1976). R.W. Frei and W. Santi, 2. Anal. Chem., 277, 303 (1975). J.T. Stewart, TrAC, 1 (7), 170 (1982). LS. Krull and E.P. Lankmeyer, Am. st., May, 18 (1982). R.W. Frei, Chromatographia, 15, 161 (1982). R.S. Deelder, A.T.J.M. Kuijpers and J.H.M. van den Berg, J. Chromatogr., 255, 545 (1983). R.W. Frei and A.H.M.T. Scholten, J. Chromatogr. Sci., 17, 152 (1979). LS. Krull, Ed., "Reaction Detection in Liquid Chromatography", Marcel Dekker, New York, 1986. R.W. Frei and J .F. Lawrence, "Chemical Derivatization in Analytical Chemistry", Vol. 1, Plenum Press, New York, 1981. R.W. Frei and J .F. Lawrence, "Chemical Derivatization in Analytical Chemistry", Vol. 2, Plenum Press, New York, 1982. T. Jupille, J. Chromatogr. Sci., 17, 160 (1979). Kratos Analytical Instruments, Ramsey, New Jersey. Bibliography Service, Technicon, Inc., Tarrytown, New York. S. Katz, W.W. Pitt, Jr. and G. Jones, Clin. Chem., 19, 817 (1973). S. Katz and W.W. Pitt, Jr., Anal. Lett., 5, 177 (1972). D. Westerlung, J. Carlqvist and A. Theordorsen, Acta Pharm. Svecics, 16, 187 (1979). H.A. Moye and T.W. Wade, Anal. Lett., 9, 801 (1976). R.T. Krause, J. Chromatogr., 185, 615 (1979). 66. 67. 68. 69. 70. 71. 72. 73. 74. 75. 76. 77. 78. 79. 80. 81. 82. 83. 84. 85. 131 W.Th. Kok, U.A.Th. Brinkman and R.W. Frei, Anal. Chim. Acts, 162, 19 (1984). N. Watanabe and M. Inoue, Anal. Chem., 55, 1016 (1983). L. Dalgaard, L. Nordholm and L. Brimer, J. Chromatogr., 303, 67 (1984). L. Ogren, I. Csiky, L. Risinger, L.G. Nilsson and G. Johansson, Anal. Chim. Acta, 117, 71 (1980). C.M. Selavka, LS. Krull and LS. Lurie, Forensic Sci. Int., 31, 103 (1986). T.D. Schlabach, S.R. Chang, K.M. Gooding and P.E. Regnier, J. Chromatogr., 134, 91 (1977). S. Ahuja, J. Chromatogr. Sci., 17, 168 (1979). W.P. Cochrane, in "Chemical Derivatization in Analytical Chemistry", Vol. 1, R.W. Frei and J.F. Lawrence, Eds., Plenum Press, New York, 1981, Ch. 1. B.D. Page and H.B.S. Conacher, in "Chemical Derivatization in Analytical Chemistry", Vol. 2, R.W. Frei and J.F. Lawrence, Eds., Plenum Press, New York, 1982, Ch. 6. R.M. Cassidy and S. Elchuk, J. Liq. Chromatogr., 4(3), 379 (1981). P.T. Kissinger, K. Bratin, G.C. Davis and L.A. Pachla, J. Chromatogr. Sci., 17, 137 (1979). LS. Krull, C.M. Selavka, C. Duda and W. Jacobs, J. Liq. Chromatogr., 8(15), 2845 (1985). J.F. Lawrence, J. Chromatogr. Sci., 17, 147 (1979). R. Reh and G. Schwedt, Chromatographia, 14(4), 249 (1981). R. Reh and G. Schwedt, Chromatographia, 14(5), 317(1981). R.W. Frei and J.F. Lawrence, "Chemical Derivatization in Analytical Chemistry", Vol. 1, Plenum Press, New York, 1981, p. 294. J.F.K. Huber, K.M. Jonker and H. Poppe, Anal. Chem., 52, 2 (1980). A.H.M.T. Scholten, U.A.Th. Brinkman and R.W. Frei, Anal. Chem., 54, 1932 (1982). Carr and L. Bowers, "Immobilized Enzymes in Analytical and Clinical Chemistry, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1980. M. Uihlen and E. Schwab, Chromatographis, 15, 140 (1982). 86. 87. 88. 89. 90. 91. 92. 93. 94. 95. 96. 97. 98. 99. 100. 101. 102. 103. 104. 132 H. Engelhardt and U.D. Neue, Chromatographis, 15, 403 (1982). R. Tijsssn, Anal. Chim. Acta, 114, 71 (1980). R.S. Deelder, M.G.F. Kroll, A.J.B. Beeren and J.H.M. van den Berg, J. Chromatogr., 149, 669 (1978). R.S. Deelder, M.G.F. Kroll and J.H.M. van den Berg, J. Chromatogr., 125, 307 (1976). T.D. Schlabach, S.H. Chang, K.M. Goodring and T.E. Regnier, J. Chromatogr., 134, 91 (1977). K.M. Jonker, H. Poppe and J.F.K. Huber, Z. Anal. Chem., 279, 154 (1976). K.M. Jonker, H. Poppe and J.F.K. Huber, Chromatographia, 11, 123 (1978). J .W. Hilby, in "Proceedings of Symposium on Interaction Between Fluids and Particles", P.A. Rottenburg, Ed., Institution of Chemical Engineers, London, 1962, p. 312. A.H.M.T. Scholten, U.A.Th. Brinkman and R.W. Frei, J. Chromatogr., 205, 229 (1981). J.F. Lawrence, U.A.Th. Brinkman and R.W. Frei, J. Chromatogr., 171, 73 (1979). J.F. Lawrence, U.A.Th. Brinkman and R.W. Frei, J. Chromatogr., 185, 473 (1979). C.E. Werkhoven, U.A.Th. Brinkman and R.W. Frei, Anal. Chim. Acta, 114, 147 (1980). R.J. Reddingius, G.J. DeJong, U.A.Th. Brinkman and R.W. Frei, J. Chromatogr., 205, 77 (1981). F. Smedes, J.C. Kraak, C.E. Werkhdven—Goewie, U.A.Th. Brinkman and R.W. Frei, J. Chromatogr., 247, 123 (1982). J.A. Apffel, U.A.Th. Brinkman and R.W. Frei, Chromatographia, 18, 5 ( 1984). J.A. Apffel, U.A.Th. Brinkman and R.W. Frei, J. Chromatogr., 312, 153 (1984). U.A.Th. Brinkman and F.A. Maris, TrAC, 4, 55 (1985). K. Zach and W. Voelter, Chromatographia, 8, 350 (1979). E. Oelrich and D. Theuerkauf, J. High. Res. and Chromatogr. Commun., 2, 256 (1979). 105. 106. 107. 108. 109. 110. 111. 112. 113. 114. 115. 116. 117. 118. 119. 120. 121. 122. 123. 124. 125. 133 R.W. Frei, L. Michel and W. Santi, J. Chromatogr., 126, 655 (1976). J.F. Studebaker, J. Chromatogr., 185, 497 (1979). K.H. Xie, S. Colgan and LS. Krull, J. Liq. Chromatogr., 6, 125 (1983). L. Nondek, R.W. Frei and U.A.Th. Brinkman, J. Chromatogr., 282, 141 (1983). H. Jansen, R.W. Frei, U.A.Th. Brinkman, R.S. Deelder and R.P.J. Snelling, J. Chromatogr., 325, 255 (1985). H. Jansen, U.A.Th. Brinkman and R.W. Frei, Chromatographia, 20, 453 (1985). W.Th. Kok, G. Grosnendijk. U.A.Th. Brinkman and R.W. Frei, J. Chromatogr., 315, 271 (1984). M.F. Lefevere, R.W. Frei, A.H.M.T. Scholten and U.A.Th. Brinkman, Chromatographia, 15, 459 (1982). M.S. Gandelman, J.W. Birks, U.A.Th. Brinkman and R.W. Frei, J. Chromatogr., 282, 193 (1983). J.N. LePage and E.M. Rocha, Anal. Chem., 55, 136011983). S. Veibel, "The Determination of Hydroxyl Groups", Academic Press, New York, 1972. M. Pesez, P. Poirier and J. Bartos, "Practique de L’Analyse Organique Colorimetrique", Masson st Cie, Paris, 1966. D.R. Knapp, "Handbook of Analytical Derivatization Reactions", John Wiley 8. Sons, New York, 1979. T. Hanai, Ed., "Phenols and Organic Acids", Vol. 1, CRC Press, Inc., Boca Raton, Florida, 1982. P. Koppe, F. Dietz, J. Traud and Ch. Rubelt, Z. Anal..Chem., 285, 1’ (1977). W.L. Koltun, J. Am. Chem Soc., 79, 5681 (1957). L. Wofsy, H. Metzger and SJ. Singer, Biochemistry, 1, 103 (1962). R.L. Hossfeld, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 73, 852 (1951). R.L. Hossfeld, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 74, 5766 (1952). J.J. Fox and J.B. Gauge, J. Chem. Ind., 39, 306T (1920-22). L.R. Whitlock, S. Siggia and J.E. Smola, Anal. Chem., 44, 532 (1972). 126. 127. 128. 129. 130. 131. 132. 133. 134. 135. 136. 137 . 138. 139. 140. 141. 142. 143. 144. 145. 134 C. Baiocchi, M.C. Gennaro, E. Campi, E. Mentasti and K. Aruga, Anal. Lett., 15(A19), 1539 (1982). S. Patai, Ed., "The Chemistry of Diazonium and Diazo Groups", John Wiley a. Sons, New York, 1978. LM. Kolthoff and P.J. Elving, " Analytical Chemistry of Inorganic and Organic Compounds: Treatise on Analytical Chemistry, Part II", Vol. 15, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1976. K. Schank in "Methodicum Chimicum", Vol. 6, F. Zymalkowski, Ed., Academic Press, New York, 1975, Ch. 7. H. Zollinger, "Azo and Diazo Chemistry", Interscience Publishers, Inc., New York, 1961. L.P. Hammett, "Physical Organic Chemistry", McGraw Hill, New York, 1940. D.N. Kramer and L.U. Tolentino, Anal. Chem., 43, 834 (1971). 11.0. Friestad, D.E. Ott and F.A. Gunther, Anal. Chem., 41, 1750 (1969). H.D. Gibbs, J. Biol. Chem., 72, 649 (1927). J.C. Dacre, Anal. Chem., 43, 589 (1971). E.F. Mohler, Jr. and L.N. Jacob, Anal. Chem., 29, 1369 (1957). D. Svobodova, J. Gasparic and L. Novakova, Coll. Czech. Chem. Commun., 35, 31 (1970). D. Svobodova, P. Krenek, M. Fraenkl and J. Gasparic, Mikrochim. Acts, [Wien], 251, I, (1977). D. Svobodova, P. Krenek, M. Fraenkl and J. Gasparic, Mikrochim. Acts, [Wien], 197, II, (1978). 0.6. Guiltbault, D.N. Kramer and E. Hackley, Anal. Chem., 38, 1897 (1966). E. Emerson, J. Org. Chem., 8, 417 (1943). E. Emerson and L.C. Beegle, J. Org. Chem., 13, 532 (1943). M.B. Ettinger, C.C. Ruchhoft and R.J. Lishka, Anal. Chem., 23, 1783 (1951). Technicon, Inc., Tarrytown, New York. "American Chemical Society for Testing and Materials", Method D- 1783-70, Pennsylvania, 1970. 146. 147. 148. 149. 150. 151. 152. 153. 154. 155. 156. 157. 158. 159. 160. 161. 162. 163. 164. 165. 166. 135 "Standard Methods for Examination of Water and Wastewater", American Public Health Association, New York, 1971. G. Blo, F. Dondi and C. Bighi, J. Chromatogr., 295, 231 (1984). R.W. Stoughton, J. Biol. Chem., 115, 293 (1936). W. Scott, "Standard Methods of Chemical Analysis", Vol. 2, N.H. Furman, Ed., Van Nostrand Co., New York, 1939, p. 2253. R.D. Krause and D. Kratochvil, Anal. Chem., 45, 844 (1973). L. Lykken, R.S. Treseder and V. Zahn, Ind. Eng. Chem., 18, 103 (1946). A.J.P. Martin, "Gas Chromatography", V.J. Coates, H.J. Noebels and LS. Fagerson, Eds., Academic Press, New York, 1958, p. 237. J. Porath and H. Bennich, Arch, Biochem. BiOphys., Suppl. 1, 152 (1962). S. Nakamura, S. Ishiguro, T. Yamada and S. Moriizumi, J. Chromatogr., 83, 279 (1973). H. Kalasz, J, Nagy and J. Knoll, J. Chromatogr., 107, 35 (1975). J. Lesec, F. Lafuma and C. Quivoron, J. Chromatogr. Sci., 12, 683 (1974). K.J. Bombaugh, W.A. Dark and R.F, Levangie, J. Chromatogr. Sci., 7, 42 (1969). J.L. Waters, J. Polym. Sci., A2, 8, 411 (1970). K.J. Bombaugh, J. Chromatogr., 53, 27 (1970). K.J. Bombaugh and R.F. Levangie, Separ. Sci., 5, 751 (1970). J.A. Biesenberger, M. Tan, 1. Duvdevani and T. Maurer, Polym. Lett., 9, 353 (1971). J.A. Biesenberger, M. Tan and I. Duvdevani, J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 15, 1549 (1971). I. Duvdevani, J.A. Biesenberger and M. Tan, Polm. Lett., 9, 429 (1971). K.E. Conroe, Chromatographia, 8, 119 (1975). J. Lesec and C. Quivoron, Analusis, 4, 20 ( 1976). M. Minarik, M. Pop] and J. Mostecky, J. Chromatogr. Sci., 19, 250 (1981). 167. 168. 169. 170. 171. 172. 173. 174. 175. 176. 177. 178. 179. 180. 181. 182. 183. 184. 185. 186. 187. 188. 136 M. Martin, F. Verillon, C.E. Ben and G. Guichon, J. Chromatogr., 125, 17 (1976). R.A. Henry, S.H. Byrne and D.R. Hudson, J. Chromatogr. Sci., 12, 197 (1974). L.R. Snyder, J.W. Dolan and Sj. van der Wal, J. Chromatogr., 103, 3 (1981). P. Kucera and G. Maerius, J. Chromatogr., 219, 1 (1981). M.J. Carter and M.T. Huston, Environ. Sci. and Technol., 12, 309 (1978). M.B. Ettinger, S. Schott and 0.0. Ruchhoft, J. Am. Water Works Assoc., 35, 299 (1943). M. Farcasiu, Fuel, 56, 9 (1977). M. Danna, Ph.D. Thesis, Michigan State University, 1985. C. Wittwer and H. Zollinger, Helv. Chim. Acta, 37, 1954 (1954). G. Schwarzenbach, Helv. Chim. Acta, 26, 418 (1943). R.C. Weast and M.J. Astle, Eds., "CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics", 60“ Ed., CRC Press, Boca Raton Florida, 1980, p. D-166. H. Zollinger, "Azo and Diazo Chemistry", Interscience Publishers, Inc., New York, 1961, p.51. R.T. Morrison and R.N. Boyd, "Organic Chemistry", Allyn and Bacon, Inc., Toronto, 1976, p. 773. C.L.M. Stults, Ph.D. in progress, Michigan State University. W. Spendley, G.R. Hext and F.R. Himsworth, Technometrics, 4, 441 (1962). J.A. Nelder and R. Mead, Computer J., 7, 308 (1965). S.N. Deming and S.L. Morgan, Anal. Chim. Acts, 150, 183(1983). D.E. Long, Anal. Chim. Acts, 46, 193 (1969). S.N. Deming and L.R. Parker, CRC Crit. Rev. Anal. Chem., 7, 187 (1978). M.W. Routh, P.A. Schwarz and M.B. Denton, Anal. Chem., 49, 1422 (1977). P.B. Ryan, R.L. Barr and H.D. Todd, Anal. Chem., 52, 1469 (1980). E.R. Aberg and A.G.T. Gustavsson, Anal. Chim. Acta, 144, 39 (1982). 189. 190. 191. 192. 193. 194. 195. 196. 197. 198. 199. 200. 201. 202. 203. 204. 137 S.N. Deming and S.L. Morgan, Anal. Chem., 45, 278A (1973). P.F.A. van der Wiel, R. Maassen and G. Kateman, Anal. Chim. Acta, 153, 83 (1983). D. Betteridge, A.P. Wade and A.G. Howard, Talents, 32, 709 (1985). D. Betteridge, A.P. Wade and A.G. Howard, Talents, 32, 723 (1985). L. Lang, Ed., "Absorption Spectra in the Ultraviolet and Visible Region", Vol. XV, Academic Press, Inc. New York, 1971, p. 20. R.M. Cassidy, D.S. LeGay and R.W. Frei, J. Chromatogr. Sci., 12, 85 (1974). S.R. Ratanathanawongs and S.R. Crouch, Anal. Chim. Acts, accepted for publication, 1986. W.A. Armstrong, B.W. Grant and W.G. Humphreys, Anal. Chem., 1300 (1963). P.M. Wiegand, Ph.D. Thesis, Michigan State University, 1985. P.M. Wiegand, FACSS XI, Philadelphia, 1984. R.P.W. Scott and P. Kucera, J. Chromatogr. Sci., 9, 641 (1971). L.R. Snyder, J. Chromatogr. Sci., 10, 200 (1972). H. Janssen, U.A.Th. Brinkman and R.W. Frei, J. Chromatogr. Sci., 23, 279 (1985). 6.6. Guilbault, "Analytical Uses of Immobilized Enzymes", Marcel Dekker, New York, 1984. L.D. Bowers and W.D. Bostick in "Chemical Derivatization in Analytical Chemistry", Vol. 2, R.W. Frei and J.F. Lawrence, Eds., Plenum Press, New York, 1982. P.D. Wentzell, Ph.D. Thesis in progress, Michigan State University.