HISTOCHEMICAL PROFILES OF RAT TRICEPS SURAE AND PLANTARIS AFTER SEVEN EXERCISE 'REGIMENS Thesis for the Degree of Ph. D. MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY JAMES FRANCIS TAYLOR 1971 vi ”-12.5 1 This is to certify that the thesis entitled HISTOCHEHICAL PROFILES OF RAT TRICEPS SURAE AND PLANTARIS. AFTER SEVEN EXERCISE REGIMENS presented by James Francis Taylor has been accepted towards fulfillment of the requirements for _P_h_.£.__ degree in w MW Major professor Datg November, 1971 - ‘ gm ABSTRACT HISTOCHEMICAL PROFILES OF RAT TRICEPS SURAE AND PLANTARIS AFTER SEVEN EXERCISE REGIMENS BY James Francis Taylor This study was undertaken to determine the effects of seven different exercise regimens on the histochemical characteristics and distribution of selected muscle fibers of the triceps surae and plantaris muscles of albino rats. One hundred and seventy-six 72-day—old, normal, male, albino rats (Sprague-Dawley Strain) were randomly assigned to one of the seven treatments. Treatments be- gan after a 12 day adjustment period when all animals were 85 days of age. The treatment groups were sedentary con- trol (CON); voluntary running (VOL); short-duration, high- speed endurance running (SHT); medium-duration, moderate- speed endurance running (MED); long-duration, low-speed endurance running (LON); electric stimulus control (ESC); and long-duration, low-intensity swimming (SWM). Treat- ments were administered once a day, Monday through Friday. All animals had access to food and water aleibitum. Seven animals, limited to the same duration, were weighed and sa of tra peritor was inj muscle taris m iSOpent proxima USing a Procedu. glycolyd fiber 1:: Cinate C (adenOsl-l each Spe plantari inteIISit chemiCal were rEC James Francis Taylor and sacrificed after zero, four, eight, and twelve weeks of training. The final sample consisted of 94 animals. Animals were sacrificed under anesthesia by intra- peritoneal injection of pentobarbital sodium. Pelikan ink was injected into the vascular system for capillary per muscle fiber calculations. The triceps surae and plan— taris muscles were removed as a unit, and frozen in an isopentane-liquid nitrogen system. Fresh-frozen, distal- proximal serial cross sections, were cut at 10 microns using a rotary microtome-cryostat. Four histochemical procedures were utilized for identification of relative fiber type intensities of glycogen (periodic acid-Schiff), glycolytic enzyme (phosphorylase), oxidative enzyme (suc- cinate dehydrogenase), and energy producing systems (adenosine triphosphatase). Fifty muscle fibers, from each specific intramuscular area of medial gastrocnemius, plantaris, and soleus muscles, were graded according to intensity and distribution patterns of the various histo- chemical procedures. The percentages of intensity ratings were recorded for individual animals. The prominence of duration, as well as treatment, effects suggested that the seven different chronic physi- cal activities had specific effects upon the alteration of fiber characteristics, but the effects were highly time dependent. The results indicated there were diverse regional responses and patterns of change over time, to the same exerci variou in pro planta Schiff four an Produce intermeI Stimulu. nificam tWelve y Ir PAS inte and Swim control Creases twelIIe w result a: Specific The gaStrOCnEI TH James Francis Taylor exercise stimulus. Four, eight, and twelve weeks of various activity programs produced metabolic alterations in proportions of fiber types in the medial gastrocnemius, plantaris, and soleus muscles. In the soleus muscle area, similar periodic acid~ Schiff (PAS) changes occurred for the voluntary group at four and eight weeks. The voluntary (VOL) group activity produced a significant increase in the percentage of intermediate ATP fibers at eight weeks, while the electric stimulus control (ESC) treatment produced a similar sig- nificant increase at four weeks, which was reversed at twelve weeks (p < .20). In the plantaris muscle area increases in similar PAS intensities were found at four weeks for long (LON) and swimming (SWM) groups (p < .20). The electric stimulus control (ESC) and SWM programs produced significant in- creases in the percentage low intensity ATP fibers at twelve weeks, while the VOL treatment produced the same result at four weeks. The short (SHT) group showed a specific pattern of increasing intermediate ATP fibers from four to twelve weeks (p < .20). The general adaptive patterns for the medial gastrocnemius muscle area showed that anaerobic fibers were able to acquire aerobic fiber characteristics and supported the hypothesis of specificity of alteration. The greatest relative rise in ATP occurred in the medium (MED) I observq and bet James Francis Taylor (MED) and long (LON) running groups. This change was observed between four and twelve weeks for the MED group and between zero and eight weeks for the LON group. HISTOCHEMICAL PROFILES OF RAT TRICEPS SURAE AND PLANTARIS AFTER SEVEN EXERCISE REGIMENS BY James Francis Taylor A THESIS Submitted to Michigan State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Department of Anatomy 1971 (Chairn Van Hug throngh to Dr. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I wish to thank my committee, Dr. R. E. Carrow (Chairman), Dr. R. Echt, Dr. M. H. Ratzlaff and Dr. W. D. Van Huss for their guidance, consideration and criticism throughout the study. Sincere appreciation is extended to Dr. R. E. Carrow, who served as chairman and advisor, for his painstaking guidance, interest, patience and en- couragement to develop my tentative ideas into a practical research project. I am grateful to Dr. R. O. Ruhling, and A. T. Reed for their involvement in other phases of this research project, which yielded many hours of intellectual dis— cussion. It is a pleasure to thank Mrs. Barbara Wheaton and Miss Patricia L. Lamb for contributing their technical assistance and Laboratory experience. Special thanks should be given to Dr. W. W. Heusner for the care and training of the animals in the Human Energy Research Laboratory, Department of Health, Physical Education and Recreation. ii I deeply extend appreciation to my wife, Jan and son Matthew for their unending patience and forebearance during this most often neglectful period. This study was supported by National Institutes of Health Grant HD 03918. iii INTROE REVIEW MATERII: RESULTS TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . General Comments . . . Statement of the Problem Rationale . . . . . Significance of the Problem . REVIEW OF PERTINENT LITERATURE . Red, Intermediate, and White Muscle Fibers . . . Skeletal Muscle Fiber Response to Skeletal Experimentally Induced Conditions. Skeletal Muscle Fiber Response to Exercise Biochemical and Histochemi- cal Studies . . . . MATERIALS AND METHODS . . . . Experimental Animals. . Treatment Groups . . . Duration Groups . . . Treatment Procedures. . Animal Care . . . . Sacrifice Procedures. Histochemical Procedures Histological Procedure . Tissue Analysis . . . Statistical Procedures . RESULTS 0 C C O O O O O 0 Training Results . . . Histochemical Results . DISCUSSION. . . . . . . . Limitations of this Study 0 O O O O O O 0 0 O and Suggestions for Future Study iv Page kWh-IF OS 20 25 34 34 34 37 38 40 40 44 45 45 54 56 56 58 71 82 SUMMAI LIST APPENZ Appen ‘ SUMMARY LIST OF APPENDIC Appendix AND CONCLUSIONS . . Summary. . . . . Conclusions . . . REFERENCES. . . . ES Training Programs . Training Performance Conditions . . . and Environmental Histochemical Fiber Type Raw Data . Statistical Tables for Medial Gastroc- nemius, Plantaris, and Soleus Muscles. Histochemical Fiber Type Mean Data. Page 84 84 87 88 107 111 117 123 132 Table ‘~m.v .F!.. W.» . r . Table 1. 10. LIST OF TABLES Nomenclatural schemes for classifying fiber types 0 O O O I O O I I O O I O I Comparison of training programs used by various investigators. . . . . . . . . Final cell frequencies by treatment and duration of treatment. . . . . . . . . Localization and reaction intensity of end- product in red, intermediate, and white skeletal muscle fibers (cross section) . . . Summary of Scheffé contrasts for area/histo— chemical Sin’l percent ratings within duration . . . . . . . . . . . . . Summary of Scheffé contrasts for histochemical Sin-1 percent ratings for statistically significant treatments at four weeks in medial gastrocnemius muscle . . . . . . . . . Summary of Scheffé contrasts for histochemical Sin'l percent ratings for statistically significant treatments at eight weeks in medial gastrocnemius muscle. . . . . . . Summary of Scheffé contrasts for histochemical Sin“1 percent ratings for statistically significant treatments at twelve weeks in medial gastrocnemius muscle. . . . . . . Summary of Scheffé contrasts for area/histo- chemical Sin"1 percent ratings within duration of treatment. . . . . . . . . Summary of Scheffé contrasts for histochemical Sin"1 percent ratings for statistically significant duration of treatment in medial gastrocnemius muscle . . . . . . . . . vi Page 19 26 42 52 60 61 62 63 64 65 Table 11. 12. A-l. C~2 c~3 .- V Hnt de mnpa Table 11. 12. A-l. A-3. C-Z. Summary of Scheffe contrasts for histo- chemical Sin"l percent ratings for statistically significant duration of treat- ment in plantaris muscle . . . . . . . Summary of Scheffe contrasts for histo- chemical Sin"l percent ratings for statistically significant duration of treat- ment in soleus muscle . . . . . . . . Standard eight—week, short-duration, high- speed endurance training program for post- pubertal and adult male rats in controlled running wheels . . . . . . . . . . Standard eight—week, medium-duration, moderate-speed endurance training program for postpubertal and adult male rats in controlled running wheels. . . . . . Standard eight-week, long-duration, low- Speed endurance training program for post- pubertal and adult male rats in controlled running wheels . . . . . . . . . . Standard eight-week, endurance, swimming training program for postpubertal and adult male rats . . . . . . . . . . . . Treatment environment and body weight values for short, medium and long groups. Treatment environment and body weight values for swimming group. . . . . . . Histochemical ratings for medial gastroc— nemius muscle presented by animal number, treatment, and duration . . . . . . Histochemical ratings for plantaris muscle presented by animal number, treatment, and duration . . . . . . . . . . . Histochemical ratings for soleus muscle presented by animal number, treatment, and duration . . . . . . . . . vii Page 66 67 107 108 109 110 111 112 117 119 121 Table D-l. D-Z. D-3. ... .3: 1.....1 9' a. .Ffllotl. r was: Table D-1. Two—way analysis 0 variance tables histochemical Sin“ percent ratings medial gastrocnemius muscle . . . Two-way analysis of variance tables histochemical Sin"1 percent ratings plantaris muscle. . . . . . . Two-way analysis 0 variance tables histochemical Sin" percent ratings soleus muscle. . . . . . . . viii Page for in O O O 123 for in . . . 126 for in . . . 129 Plate II. LIST OF PLATES AND FIGURES Page Figures 2 through 6 are sections taken from control animals . . . . . . . . . . 48 Figures 7 through 12 are sections taken from control animals . . . . . . . . 50 Figure 13. E-3 0 Frequency of fiber ratings (weighted score) presented by area, treatment and duration of treatment for SDH, ATP, PPL and PAS . . . 70 Mean daily per cent shock free time (PSF) and per cent expected revolutions (PER) for CRW short I I O O O I O O O O O O 113 Mean daily per cent shock free time (PSF) and per cent expected revolutions (PER) for , CRW medium. I O O O I O O O O O O 114 Mean daily per cent shock free time (PSF) and per cent expected revolutions (PER) for CRW long . . . . . . . . . . . . 115 Mean daily total revolutions run (TRR) for voluntary and CRW short, medium, and long . 116 Mean per cent histochemical fiber ratings for medial gastrocnemius by treatment and duration of treatment . . . . . . . . 132 Mean per cent histochemical fiber ratings for plantaris by treatment and duration of treatment 0 O O O I O O O I O O O l 3 3 Mean per cent histochemical fiber ratings for soleus by treatment and duration of treatment . . . . . . . . . . . . 134 ix VITA JAMES F. TAYLOR Final examination: October 26, 1971, 4:00 p.m. Dissertation: Histochemical profiles of rat triceps surae and plantaris after seven exercise regimens. Major Subject: Anatomy Biographical items: Born: January 12, 1942. Manistique, Michigan. Undergraduate studies: B.A., Biology; Northern Michigan University, Marquette, Michigan, 1964. M.A., Biology; Northern Michigan University, Marquette, Michigan 1966. Professional experience: Graduate assistant, Department of Biology, Northern Michigan University, 1964—66. Instructor in Biology, Department of Biology, Northern Michigan University, 1966-68. Graduate assistant, Department of Anatomy, College of Human Medicine, Michigan State University, 1968-71. Instructor in Anatomy, Department of Anatomy, College of Human Medicine, Michigan State University, 1971. xi certa this CON , caw 23c EST . LON , Mm , MG \. .{BT PER . LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS To prevent confusion, and for the sake of clarity, certain words and/or phrases are abbreviated throughout this thesis. ATP CDS CON CRW ESC EST LON MG NBT PAS PER .Intermyofibrillar adenosine triphosphatase .Cumulative duration of shock (seconds) received by both the experimental, and the control animals during all work periods of all bouts of a given training period. .Sedentary control .Controlled Running Wheel .Electric stimulus control .Expected swim time (minutes) .Long-duration, low-intensity running exercise (long CRW program) .Medium-duration, moderate- intensity running exercise (medium CRW program) .Medial Gastrocnemius muscle .Nitro Blue Tetrazolium .Periodic Acid-Schiff .Percent expected revolutions; PER = 100 TRR/TER xii PET . PLT . PPL . PSF . SOL . SDH . SHT . STC. SWM. TER . TRR. PET PLT PPL PSF SOL SDH SHT STC SWM TER TRR TWT VOL .Percent expected swim time; PET = 100 STC/EST .Plantaris muscle .Phosphorylase .Percent shock free time; PSF = 100 - (100 CDS/TWT) .Soleus muscle .Succinate dehydrogenase .Short-duration, high—intensity running exercise (short CRW program) .Swim time completed .Swimming exercise .Total expected revolutions that the animal would run, during all work periods of all bouts of a given train- ing period, if he would run at the prescribed speed. .Total number of revolutions run by the experimental animal, during all work periods of all bouts of a given train- ing period. .Total work time (sec) during all work periods of all bouts of a given train— ing period. .Voluntary running exercise xiii INTRODUCTION General Comments Classic investigations in the nineteenth century (Denny-Brown, 1929a) suggested possible correlations be- tween certain cytological aspects of “red" and "white" muscle and functional activity. Since then numerous physiological and histological studies have documented differences between "red" and "white" muscle (Denny—Brown, 1929a; Jinnai, 1960; Beatty g£_al., 1963, 1966, 1967; Blanchaer, 1964; Gauthier and Padykula, 1966; Olson and Swett, 1966; Adams gt_al., 1967; Arangio and Hagstrom, 1969; Briskey 23 31., 1970; Sandow, 1970; Schiaffino §E_al., 1970). Recent histochemical investigations clearly show marked heterogeneity in glycolytic and oxi- dative properties between red and white muscle (Padykula, 1952; Glock and McLean, 1953; Takeuchi and Kuriaki, 1955; Wachstein and Meisel, 1955; Ogata, 1958; Nachmias and Padykula, 1958; Dubowitz and Pearse, 1961; Beckett, 1962, Ogata and Mori, 1964). Histochemical identification of enzymatically contrasting muscles, with even more unique fiber types, indicates the existence of differences in energy metabolism and energy supplying systems important to contractile function. It is presently hypothesized that control of the metabolic and contractile properties of skeletal muscle is related to (a) the frequency of impulses in the motor nerve; (b) or the motoneurone release of "trephic" sub— stances independent of electrical activity (Gutmann gt 31., 1956; Guth, 1968; Fex, 1969; Bass gt_al., 1970; Fex and Sonesson, 1970; Gutmann, 1970; Robert and Oester, 1970). Employing these basic tenents, investigations have shown that skeletal muscle prOperties are mutable in atrOphy (Bajusz, 1964; Fischbach and Robbins, 1969, 1970; Brooks, 1970; Kauffman and Albuquerque, 1970; Klinkerfuss and Haugh, 1970), denervation (Needham, 1926; Nachmias and Padykula, 1958; Huls and Leonard, 1961; Gutmann, 1962; Pelligrini and Franzini, 1963; Hogan et_al., 1965; Engel 22 21., 1966; Prewitt and Salafsky, 1967; Sreter, 1970), cross-innervation (Buller gt 31., 1960a, 1960b; Buller and Lewis, 1965a; Smith, 1965; Romanul and VanDerMeulen, 1966; Dubowitz, 1967a, 1967b, 1967c; Eccles, 1967; Hnik gt_al., 1967; Prewitt and Salafsky, 1967; Yellin, 1967; Gerebtzoff, 1968; Guth gt 31., 1968; Karpati and Engel, 1968b; Ogata 23 31., 1968; Buller and Mommaerts, 1969; Close, 1969; Robbins 23 31., 1969; Guth gt_al., 1970) and immobilization (Bach, 1948; Wells, 1969) as identified by anatomical, histochemical, biochemical, and physiological measures. Recent evidence suggests that exercise has similar effects upon skeletal muscle properties (Gordon, 1967; Gordc 1970, Oscai Short 1970; Golln inter an en' City ( histo. T0 co: metabc knowl: ident: i5 ne< 0f 58‘ Chara: c“Emit of HO] Gordon §E_al., 1967a, 1967b; Holloszy, 1967; Barnard §E_al., 1970, 1971; Edgerton gt 31., 1969, 1970; Holloszy and Oscai, 1969; Kowalski gt 31,, 1969; Lamb gt_al., 1969; Short §t_a1,, 1969; Ruhling, 1970; Spurway and Young, 1970; Campbell st 31., 1971; Faulkner gt 31., 1971; Gollnick, 1971). This body of knowledge is difficult to interpret because exercise too often has been viewed as an entity, not as an aerobic-anaerobic continuum. Specifi- city of exercise as a reality was intimated in a related histochemical study on heart metabolism (Ruhling, 1970). To corroborate the emerging histochemical evidence of metabolic plasticity of skeletal muscle with exercise, a knowledge of the regional and temporal responses to identical and diverse physiological stimuli ultimately is necessary. Statement of the Problem This study was undertaken to determine the effects of seven different exercise regimens on the histochemical characteristics of selected muscle fiber areas of gastro— <3nemius and soleus (triceps surae), and plantaris muscles (of normal, adult, male, albino rats. Rationale The extent to which the principle of specificity applies to a continuum of exercise is a fundamental Phfiiological question which must be answered. Histo- cileamical approaches to investigate this question are cons a ra dist skel repr conspicuously absent. This study was designed to permit a rational statement, in histochemical terms, regarding distinctive patterns of metabolic alterations in rat skeletal muscle fibers that are associated with defined, reproducible exercise regimens. It was postulated that cellular enzyme and substrate levels are determined by the frequency, intensity and duration of contraction, in accord with the metabolic requirements of the animal. It was believed also that these cellular responses are not only specific to the exercise requirements of the total muscle but are identi— fiable by specific muscle area, and even at the individual muscle fiber level, as identified in histochemical tissue sections. Significance of the Problem Histochemical investigations indicate that basic differences exist within, as well as between, classic muscle fiber types. Incorporation of methods of subject— ing animals to different controlled regimens of reproduci- ble exercise, which compare favorably with human exercise programs requiring aerobic, anaerobic, and aerobic— anaerobic adaptations, should yield: (a) differential histochemical fiber type alterations produced by specific regimens of physical activity, (b) new evidence on general patterns of adaptation to specific exercise regimens and the effects of different durations of the various exercise PIOG scri and cell adapv programs, (c) a body of knowledge for intelligent pre— scription of exercise programs at the muscle fiber level, and (d) a stimulus for investigations to elucidate the cellular mechanisms involved in exercise induced adaptations. phys of vi surgl eterJ histg variq Comte: Sheet REVIEW OF PERTINENT LITERATURE This review focuses on the fundamental anatomical, physiological, biochemical and histochemical differences of vertebrate skeletal muscle fibers; the effect of surgically induced conditions on these muscle fiber param- eters; and a consideration of related biochemical and histochemical studies on skeletal muscle response to various exercise programs. Red, Intermediate, and White Skeletal Muscle Fibers Application of diverse biological techniques to "white" and "red" muscle established new dimensions for the identification of at least three fiber types. Anatomical Differences The main differences in fiber types are found in the content, form, and distribution of the constituent cellu— 1ar organelles and associated tissues. In the red fiber large spherical mitochondria, with numerous fenestrated sheet cristae and dense matrices, form an aggregate oxi— dative machinery layer between the sarcolemma and the contractile substance (Van Breemen, 1960; Padykula and GautI Ogata inter filam I I bag I chain in th Space crist in tin exist centre of mit of Sme mYOfik red fj 1966). t0 mit Gauthier, 1963; Gauthier and Padykula, 1966; Murata and Ogata, 1969; Ogata and Murata, 1969a, 1969b). In the interior of the fibers on either side of the Z line smaller filamentous mitochondria are aligned in the region of the I band. Prominent small mitochondria form longitudinal chains in the intermyofibrillar space. In the white fiber, few mitochondria are dispersed in the subsarcolemmal space or the intermyofibrillar space, while small to medium mitochondria, with few cristae and less dense matrices, are occasionally located in the region of the I band. No striking differences exist between size and structure of the peripheral and central mitochondria (Padykula and Gauthier, 1963). The intermediate fiber occasionally has aggregates of mitochondria in the subsarcolemmal space. Accumulations of smaller mitochondria, with fewer cristae, as inter— myofibrillar chains, are not as conspicuous as found in red fibers (Gauthier and Padykula, 1966; Shafiq gt 21., 1966). Lipid dr0plet concentration is directly related to mitochondrial density (Gauthier and Padykula, 1966). The sarcoplasmic reticulum of individual red fibers has received conflicting description. Schiaffino 33 31. (1970) described a well developed sarc0p1asmic reticulum in the red fibers of the rat soleus muscle. Padykula and Gauthier (1970) and Nishiyama (1965a, 1965b), however, stated that red fibers in the diaphragm and intercostal musc ass defi The poor of s port. cont band termi trans and s °Ccas criSt< ture. lunctl ing at Gauthi 1925), 1970), more 3 Padqu and 1e muscles have poorly developed sarc0p1asmic reticulum. The assumption that mitochondrial rich fibers have poorly defined sarc0p1asmic reticulum is not true in all muscles. The view that both mitochondrial rich and mitochondrial poor fibers are fast, and have comparably rich deve10pment of sarc0p1asmic reticulum is consistent with the pro- portion of motor units with relatively fast speeds of contraction for rat soleus (Close, 1967a, 1967b). In the red and white fibers triads occur at the A-l band junctions, longitudinal tubules extend from the terminal cisternae toward the H band level to form a transverse network (Schiaffino et 31., 1970). The intermediate fiber of extensor digitorum longus and soleus muscles and the red fiber of the diaphragm occasionally have T tubules with only one junctional cristerna (dyad), instead of the familiar triad struc- ture. Sparse longitudinal tubules extend from the junctional cisternae into the A band, with limited branch— ing at the H band level (Ogata, 1964; Padykula and Gauthier, 1970; Schiaffino gt_al., 1970). The red fiber usually has more myonuclei (Needham, 1926), wider Z line (Gauthier, 1969; Schiaffino 25 31., 1970), longer sarcomere length (Schiaffino §£_§13, 1970), more sarc0plasm (Denny-Brown, 1929a; Gauthier and Padykula, 1966), and smaller diameter (Denny—Brown, 1929a), and less connective tissue (Beatty gt 31., 1966) than whit to m than middi junc mic a crete cal, White of ju media with (Ogaty and Ge and v ate tC fibers 1967; white fibers. Triglyceride droplets are directly related to mitochondrial density, and are more abundant in red than white fibers (Gauthier and Padykula, 1966). While each 22 plaque endplate is situated in the middle of the fiber, differences exist in the neruomuscular junction. The red fiber endplate has the least sarcoplas- mic and axoplasmic surface, at each contact relatively dis— crete and separate axonal terminals are small and ellipti- cal, junctional folds are shallow, flat and sparse. The white fiber has long flat axonal terminals and the profile of junctional folds increases in complexity. The inter— mediate fiber in the diaphragm has large axonal terminals with the most widely spaced and deepest junctional folds (Ogata, 1964; Ogata and Murata, 1969a, 1969b; Padykula and Gauthier, 1970). A clear cut difference in the form and volume of the junctional invagination is evident. The capillary to fiber ratio is directly proportion- ate to oxidative metabolism in red, intermediate and white fibers (Nishiyama, 1965b; Romanul, 1965; Carrow gt_a1., 1967; Romanul and Pollock, 1969; Mai gt 31., 1970). Physiological Differences Physiological studies performed on whole muscle preparations conform well with morphological investigations in establishing slow and fast twitch muscles. At birth all muscles in the kitten are uniformly slow twitch, and speed of shortening of sarcomeres 10 increases two to three fold within three to four weeks (Denny-Brown, 1929a, 1929b; Buller gt_al., 1960a; Close, 1967a, 1967b; Close and Hoh, 1967). Slow muscles in contrast to fast muscles, show little change in speed of shortening with maturation. Close (1967a, 1967b) examined the dynamic prOperties of muscles in different species and found that neither the fast nor the slow muscles had the same intrinsic speeds. In this connection at least three types of motor units have been identified in skele— tal muscles (Henneman and Olson, 1965; Wuerker gt_al., 1965; Close, 1967b; Edstram and Kugelberg, 1968, 1969). In a histochemical study on the effect of contraction induced by low frequency stimulation, Edstrdm and Kugel— berg (1969) and Kugelberg and Edstrdm (1968) showed that repetitive stimulation of ventral root, single nerve fiber or entire nerve trunk, produced preferential changes in phOSphorylase and glycogen in muscle fibers. Mapping of the motor unit showed highly intermingled phosphorylase and glycogen negative fibers, with a more pronounced in- fluence in white fibers. Wuerker gt 31. (1965), found differences in contraction speeds of individual motor units. This information tends to support the concept of a homogeneous character of the motor unit, as a natural result of the uniform neural control exerted by its motoneurone. In gastrocnemius and plantaris muscles, the type A motor unit has large, low resistance motoneurones inne tens sole smal twit 1968 on tl fibei units type 0f 3c Were milli and c V610c 13.5- milli Per 8 and 0 gold, 11 innervating fast twitch muscle units with relatively large tension output (Somjen 32 31., 1964; Burke, 1968). In the soleus muscle the type B motor unit is characterized by smaller, higher resistance motoneurones innervating slow twitch muscle units with small tension output (Burke, 1968). The type B unit characteristics are known from work on the cat soleus muscle, which has only intermediate fibers (Henneman and Olson, 1965). A group of intermediate units remains unidentified, of which some may belong to type C. Close (1967b) showed in rat soleus muscle, that of 30 units identified on basis of contraction time, 3 were intermediate (17.5 milliseconds) and 27 slow (38 milliseconds). Generally fast muscles develOp high initial tension and contract rapidly (18-129 milliseconds) with conduction velocity of 95 meters per second and an axon diameter l3.6-8.3 microns. Slow muscles contract slowly (58-193 milliseconds) with conduction velocities of (51—81 meters per secOnd) and axon diameter 6.3-2.7 microns (Henneman and Olson, 1965; Wuerker et_al., 1965; Eberstein and Goodw gold, 1968). McComas and Thomas (1968) observed for human gastroc- nemius muscle a contraction speed of 117.6 milliseconds, which appears to be considerably slower than that of slow muscles in other species, such as cat and rabbit. Rapidly contracting phasic fibers are usually located near the subcutaneous surface and slow contracting tonic fibe 195; of a 'whi and trac ceps fibel the < excel servfi fast that muscl teris fuhct of in aSCer 12 fibers near the deep axial surface (Gordon and Phillips, 1953). Physiological data tend to indicate that "redness" of a muscle reflects a slow rate of contraction, while "whiteness" reflects a fast contraction rate. Buchthal and Schmalbruch (1970) found that histograms of con- traction times agreed with histochemical findings in tri- ceps surae muscles. In the tibialis anterior muscle, red fibers constituted half the fiber population, and half of the contraction times were longer than 60 msec. However, exceptions exist. For example, Hall-Craggs (1968) ob- served that the thyroarytenoid muscle was an extremely fast twitch muscle, with histochemical characteristics, that predicted slow twitch, whereas, the cricothyroid muscle was a slow twitch muscle, with histochemical charac— teristics found in fast limb muscles. Illustrating functional activity can only be equated to the activity of individual fibers after the fiber population has been ascertained. Blood flow to individual red and white muscle has received little attention. Investigators have found that flow is three times greater in red than white limb muscles. A direct relationship exists between functional blood flow, both for substrate supply and removal, capillary per fiber, myoglobin concentration and the duration of the contraction (Reis and Wooten, 1970). en pr pl wh 10 11181 ill-Illa. F ‘ IE- I; .lol...l,.._li I >.. .I . . .7 a su] mu: 1'81 of En: Phc mus he) 9e: 91x 91c and 196 Law "We 13 Biochemical Differences The classic postulate regarding the metabolic differ- ences between red and white muscle states that white (tetanic) muscle, capable of rapid but brief contractions, primarily utilizes the glycolytic system of the sarco— plasm and associated membranes for energy production, whereas red (tonic) muscle, which can contract for pro— longed periods, relies on glycolytic and other oxidative mechanisms (Beatty gt_31., 1963). In regard to energy- supplying metabolism, possibly the metabolic type of a muscle does not cause a distinct type of function, but rather the function of a muscle implies the development of a distinct type of energy (Moody and Cassens, 1968). White muscle has high levels of activity of the enzymes of glycolysis and glycogenolysis; aldolase, phos- phorylase, pyruvate kinase and lactate dehydrogenase. Red muscle has high levels of glycogen synthetase, myoglobin, hexokinase, acetoacetate, Beta-hydroxy acyl Co-A dehydro- genase, isocitrate dehydrogenase, succinate dehydrogenase, glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase, cytochrome oxidase, and glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase (Blanchaer, 1964; Dawson and Romanul, 1964; Stubbs and Blanchaer, 1965; Beatty gt 51., 1966; Bocek gt_gl., 1966; Prewitt and Salafsky, 1967; Sigel and Pette, 1969; Jeffress and Peter, 1970). Lawrie (1952, 1953) found in various species that high myoglobin content was associated with high capacity for aer cyt ish spe to con sta bloc 1965 Misc leve 1970 narr 1970 Phos leve 14 aerobic energy-rich phosphate formation, particularly cytochrome oxidase. White muscle is relatively impover— ished in myoglobin and cytochrome oxidase. Myoglobin speeds diffusivity of oxygen into red muscle, and serves to meet sustained demand for oxygen. During sustained contraction red and intermediate fibers achieve a steady state in which work output, blood flow and utilization of blood oxygen are constant (Wittenberg, 1970). While most investigators (Stubbs and Blanchaer, 1965; Pande and Blanchaer, 1971) claim that only white muscle has high endogenous muscle glycogen, high glycogen levels have been reported for red muscle (Gillespie gt_al., 1970). The concentration of glycogen varies only within a narrow range under normal conditions (DiMauro gt a1,, 1970). The polysaccharide influences the proportion of phosphorylase a and b and glycogen synthetase and thus, its own catabolic and anabolic enzymes. High tissue levels of glycogen increase the prOportion of phosphorylase a and exert a double feed back mechanism controlling glycogen synthesis and degradation. Prenatally, the path— way of glucose to glycogen, favors glycogen formation in red and white muscle and neonatally is more active in red muscle (Bocek et 31., 1966, 1969). Gutmann gt_al. (1969) stated that glycogen breakdown was determined by the number of frequency of arriving impulses, and that meta- bolic recovery processes were dependent upon the functional 15 state of nerve centers. Glycogen concentration only rises above the initial level after high frequency stimulation. Bass et_al, (1955) and Stubbs and Blanchaer (1965) found that stimulation produced a significant conversion of phosphorylase b to a in only white muscle. White muscle consumes more glycogen and forms lactate from pyruvate to a greater extent than red muscle (Domonkos, 1961; Domonkos and Latzkovits, 1961a, 1961b). The oxygen consumption of red muscle is three times that of white muscle (Domonkos and Latzkovits, 1961a). Decreasing hydrogen ion concen- tration increases glycolysis, but does not affect respira- tory capacity in red and white muscle (Domonkos and Latzkovits, 1961a). Failure of red muscle to utilize glycolysis does not impair its efficiency. Reserve fat depots and circulating free fatty acids can be readily used by red muscle (Romanul, 1964; Reis and Wooten, 1970). Pande and Blanchaer (1971) found high mitochondrial respiratory rates with pyruvate in both red and white muscle. Com— pared to pyruvate, respiratory rate with acetylcarnitine was only slightly slower in red, but nearly half as great in white muscle mitochondria. White muscle oxidizes carbohydrate rather than fat, and in vigorous exercise glycogenolysis and carbohydrate metabolism predominates over B-oxidation and fat metabolism. 16 The contractile myosin from fast muscles has higher enzymatic activity than slow muscle (Margreth gt_al., 1970; Perry, 1970). Guth and Samaha (1969) reported that acto- mysin, isolated from cat fast muscle had threefold greater adenosine triphosphatase (ATPase) activity, and suggested that neural regulation was based upon specific type, rather than the activity, of an enzyme. The capacity of the sarco— plasmic reticulum to remove calcium from the cytOplasm, and form ATP from creatine phosphate is greater in fast (white) muscle. The converse applies to slow muscle, as ATP is formed by the oxidative activity of mitochondria. Perry (1970) noted that myosin from skeletal muscle of new born rabbits was similar to that of adult red muscle, and showed that the capacity of the cell to develop a greater tension resulted from a rise in the number of myofibrils, and hence myosin molecules. Forced activity in new born rabbits caused an early peak of ATPase activity of the sarcoplasmic reticulum. Thus, specialization appears in part to be an adaptation to activity pattern character- istic of the particular muscle. Histochemical Differences Maturation of the species is a decisive factor in differentiation of fiber types. Man and guinea pig have full differentiation of fiber types at birth. In the mouse, rat, chicken, rabbit and pig differentiation occurs postnatally (Dubowitz and Pearse, 1960, 1961; Dubowitz, 19 am fiI hie l9€ Che POP two int int. letI (Dul Whit Prod tYpe lOCE eats tYpe subC Cal ten. mu3< PAS pho. 17 1965, 1967a, 1967b, 1967c; Cooper gt_al., 1970; Ashmore and Doerr, 1971a). In the mammalian embryo all muscle fibers are equal in size and uniformly non-differentiated histochemically (Denny-Brown, 1929a; Bowden and Goyer, 1960). Investigators prOpose that the various histo— chemical types of muscle fibers develop as: separate populations (Wirsen and Larsson, 1964; Nystrom, 1968), two p0pu1ations with a possible common origin for red and intermediate fibers (Germino et_al., 1965; Fenichel, 1966), intermediate fibers as precursors of white fibers (Vince— 1ette and Jasmin, 1969), or fibers from a common pool (Dubowitz, 1965; Cooper gt 31., 1970). Basic biochemical differences exist between red and white muscles. The advent of histochemical techniques produced a valuable tool for identification of muscle fiber types at the tissue level. In adult muscle, histochemical localization of enzyme systems and other chemical constitu- ents revealed the existence of two, three or more fiber type groups. Dubowitz and Pearse (1960) suggested the subdivision of muscle into two fiber types on the recipro- cal relationship between phosphorylase and oxidative con- tent. Stein and Padykula (1962) defined A, B, and C muscle fiber types from individual fiber profiles, using PAS, SDH, non-specific esterase and two adenosine tri— phosphatase techniques. The previous investigators' muscle fiber profile was based mainly on the amount and 18 distribution pattern of diformazan particles of succinate dehydrogenase. Romanul (1964) described a spectrum of eight muscle fiber types, which could be broadly divided into three groups by correlating the relative intensities of individual histochemical procedures. Guth and Yellin (1971) also reported that, in general, three categories are evident. However, careful analysis revealed diverse combinations of enzyme activities and more than three histochemical fiber types in mammalian skeletal muscle. Other investigators favor the basic classification of only two fiber types (Engel, 1962, 1965; Karpati and Engel, 1968a, 1968b; Brooke and Engel, 1969; Brooke and Kaiser, 1970). From the preceding, various nomenclatural schemes have emerged. These are summarized in Table 1. White muscle fibers are generally characterized by high glycogen, low lipid, low oxidative enzymes, low myoglobin, high adenosine triphosphate, high M-type lactate dehydrogenase, and high phosphorylase. Red muscle fibers are generally characterized by low glycogen, high lipid, high oxidative enzymes, low phosphorylase, H—type lactate dehydrogenase, and high myoglobin. Intermediate fibers have moderate glycogen, moderate lipid, high oxi- dative enzymes, and high myoglobin (Briskey g£_al., 1970). The nomenclature should be based on the muscle fiber properties being examined and result in a clear cut differentiation of fiber types (Brooke and Kaiser, 1970). 19 .oo>ao>cfl mommy Hogan mo Esuuoomms .Hbma .GAHHON Ucm zuso 0cm “voma .Hocmeom HHH HH .onma .uomflmx can mxooum HH .Mmmma .Homcm was flammumm HH HH .onma .suso ecu chasm» can «chad .nmaucmum ecu maomum>m “mama .comao one cmEoccom «mama .maoxmomm was samum .mmmH ..HM um uuogm Ufim «mmmd ainw #0 COHHOOUM «Gog—H II.hMfixmmq com umxmm “mead .mcmmmmu can moooz.hMmMH ..Hm um xooom «vmma .Hocoeom 0cm c0m3oo «mmma ..Hm um Acumen “moms .umflnuamu new «daemons «coma .Aaccan 60m oumwooeuoucH OHHSZ mocmuouom mumoflm maomsz mo momma .mmmmu umoflm mcwhufimmoao mom mmemsom HousumaosoEOZIl.H names a< CE 19 pre dif kul in and den reS< $01E the Patt Stat 20 The relative, or semi-quantitative, histochemical re- activity can only be indicative of the amount of accumu— lated end-product. However, direct relative comparison can be made between fibers in the same muscle (Engel, 1965; Nystrom, 1966, 1968). Skeletal Muscle Fiber Response to Experimentally Induced Conditions The requirements placed upon striated muscle in specific anatomical locales, and the characteristics of the fiber types involved have been shown to change under surgically induced conditions. Denervation Engel gt 31. (1966) found that white fibers are preferentially affected by denervation, and fiber metabolic differences are no longer maintained. Nachmias and Pady- kula (1958) found that succinate dehydrogenase decreased in red fibers in both soleus and biceps femoris muscles, and white fibers were essentially unaffected. Guth and Watson (1967) electrOphoretically determined that after denervation the protein pattern of the plantaris muscle resembled that of the soleus muscle, while the denervated soleus muscle did not change; but when reinnervated by the nerve supplying the plantaris muscle the soleus muscle pattern resembled the plantaris muscle. Sreter (1970) stated that denervation affects both white and red muscles, 21 although the changes in the latter are smaller and confined to adenosine triphosphatase activity; and indicated that calcium uptake did not change significantly in red, as contrasted to profound change in white fibers. Bajusz (1964) found that red muscle fiber sarcoplasmic granu— larity was preserved longer. Smith (1965) showed that glycolytic activity was reduced, and B—oxidation enzymes were not reduced as much as mitochondrial enzymes. The basic metabolism resembled cardiac muscle in utilizing ketones and fatty acids after denervation. Cross-innervation The cross-innervation studies involve both changes in specific innervation and physiological activity of the neuromuscular apparatus. Close (1964, 1965, 1969) re- ported that changes in intrinsic speeds of shortening are brought about by a direct effect on the contractile material in fast muscle. Following cross—innervation of fast and slow muscle, investigators (Buller gt gt., 1960a, 1960b; Engel, 1965; Dubowitz, 1967a, 1967b, 1967c; Prewitt and Salafsky, 1967; Guth gt_gt., 1968, Karpati and Engel, 1968b; Ogata gt_gt., 1968; Fex, 1969; Robbins gt gt., 1969; Mann and Salafsky, 1970) reported an interconverti- bility of energy metabolism, contraction times, and capillary to fiber ratios. After cross—union there was no appreciable change in conduction velocity, as control and experimentally cross-united slow and fast nerve fibers 22 had the same conduction velocity on both sides. Muscle fibers tend to exert little appreciable influence on the time characteristics of motoneruones under these con— ditions. Several postulates are possible: (1) special differentiating action of innervation by slow motoneruones, with long after hyperpolarization, is due to the slow frequency of discharge (lO-20/second); (2) muscles become fast when activated at higher frequencies; (3) or specific chemical transmitter produced from large and small moto- neurones influence differentiation. High frequency dis- charge to slow motor units would merely serve to fatigue the muscle with no effective return in a higher con— traction tension. Buller gt_gt. (1960a, 1960b) found that differenti— ation of fast muscles was unaffected by spinal cord transection and dorsal rhizotomy, while differentiation of slow muscle was greatly depressed and contraction times resembled normal fast muscle. Guth gt_gt. (1970) reported that after cross-innervation the qualitative type of actomyosin ATPase synthesized formerly by fast muscle was that type formerly characteristic of slow muscle, and visa versa. Actomyosin adenosine triphosphatase seems to be specific pH dependent and labile, and suggests genomic control regulated by neural input. Directional transformation of muscle fiber types seems to be specific, as fast (white) muscle transforms 23 to slow (red and intermediate), slow muscle (intermediate) changes reversibly with slow (red), but slow muscle (intermediate and red) rarely converts to fast (white) (Buller and Lewis, 1965a, 1965b, Dubowitz, 1967a; Hnik gt_gt., 1967; Guth, 1968; Guth gt gt., 1968). Differenti— ation rather than dedifferentiation indicates interaction between neural factors and other physiological influences. Mommaerts gt gt. (1969) agreed that after cross-union transformation of red to white muscle appeared negligible. Cross-innervation histochemical muscle fiber type studies showed a reversal of enzyme profiles, and density of capillary network present in the fibers of their normal counterparts (Romanul and Van Der Meulen, 1966, 1967; Robbins 22.2l'v 1969; Romanul and Pollock, 1969). A general tendency exists for cross-innervated muscle to assume the variety of muscle fiber size and histochemical fiber type relationship observed under normal fast and slow neuromuscular conditions. One striking feature in reinnervated and cross-innervation muscle was the absence of the typical mosaic pattern and presence of "type group— ing" pattern, possibly brought about by abundant collateral branching of nerve fibers (Yellin, 1967; Karpati and Engel, 1968b). Prewitt and Salafsky (1967), after cross—innervation of nerves to soleus and flexor digitorum longus muscles, found an increase in pyruvate kinase and aldolase, and de< gex dig inc foli and 196E bee in t 1970 not Nels CO‘W 24 decreases in malate dehydrogenase and isocitrate dehydro— genase, in the soleus muscle. Conversely, in the flexor digitorum longus muscle, Edstr6m and Kugelberg (1968) induced muscle contractions by shock stimulation (10/ second) and found decreased phosphorylase and glycogen content in white and intermediate muscle fibers. Red muscle fibers showed increased phosphorylase and glycogen content . Tenotomy Bach (1948) reversed positions of red and white muscle tendons and found conversion of red to pale muscle. Guth and Yellin (1971) using histochemical tissue tech- niques found profound changes in actomyosin ATPase, and succinate dehydrogenase in soleus and plantaris muscles, following excision of several muscles of the posterior compartment. Vrbova (1962, 1963, 1966) and others (McMinn and Vrbova, 1962; Salmons and Vrbova, 1969, Shafiq gt_gt., 1969) concluded that, with disuse, the soleus muscle became a fast muscle, and no appreciable change occurred in the plantaris muscle. Fischback and Robbins (1969, 1970) found that rapid atrOphy alone in slow muscle was not sufficient to cause a change in contractile properties. Nelson (1969) could not confirm the findings of Vrbova and co-workers. 25 Skeletal Muscle Fiber Response to Exercise Biochemical and Histochemical Studies The literature in this area is difficult to interpret due to vastly different intensities and durations of exer- cise (for verification see Table 2). Most investigations have controlled duration (Holloszy, 1967; Edgerton gt gt., 1969), but few have controlled intensity (Ruhling, 1970). Biochemical Studies Studies to selectively correlate the effects of exercise on the myofibrillar and sarcoplasmic protein content and aerobic and anaerobic capacities are incon- clusive (Jeffress and Peter, 1970). Prolonged running increases only the sarcoplasmic proteins (Kendrick—Jones and Perry, 1965; Gordon gt_gt., 1966, 1967a, 1967b), whereas forceful exercise increases the number of myo- fibrillar proteins (Helander, 1961; Kendrick-Jones and Perry, 1967). Short gt_gt. (1969) trained rats for eight weeks by submaximal running (13.7 m/min) on a motor—driven drum, four hours daily with 5 minutes rest between each 30- minute period, six days per week. Examination of adductor magnus tt_!tttg_from these animals showed increased creatine and decreased lactate levels in the red portion, but proportionately less than that observed in the white area. Red muscle from trained animals had greater glycogen concentration. The decreased lactate I it i)”. In! I E I Tuouqafluafivsfinufi ‘30.“. Husk! \nauu MUTE: NEHNNJAJLRK hw-h.fi:.flnVIHU .nv .LNUEWHRAITCJJ . L . . ! I F '.I II‘ t 54‘ YNVI ,. L. .. I~Im x3 cHE m \mmmo m x mason m ox: NH "see ov m.m x3 cHE m \mamo m x mason m . mxs ma "gas ov o.v Amocouom Iaoouflo x3 use m.~H .mvc flames Amazon .¢ xaocommd ca nonwuomoo \mmmo m x mason v wcaccsm osmmumm onma .mcaansm wesumoum 3mo Hmsofl>HGcH mxs NH uses om o.m ooaaonucou ”pom Hbma .uoHams .omm\um mo.~ on mH.H x3 woman an scum woods» mwfiufloon> \mmoo m mo.~ can ouou mam moma ..Hm um "Emumoum xoamsou mx3 om owe mm ma.a .Hawfiommua mwcwou oumcnmm use Ham momma ouon mam moma .nmm.mw mooscflucou mused see 0H .m mv.a .Hafleomoua mocwou couuomom .mflmanam sausages age om mmma .mm:mm mooaaouucoo coaumuoa m>mo mm see on mcaEEASm pom couuomom .cHE 0H >Hm>o oom\um m~.m um museumm .cwa A no use on spas umm\uu mm.H um .aas oma on as commences Aao>am x3 age NH no a m~.~ mam mama .Aaumo Imouooum omoq .mvoHuom \mmuu m owe oma mm.a onwaocfl om .Hsumfiz can SumoHHom .cfis calm .vmoH HmwuflcH mxs «H see om om.H .Haweoooua "you «some .SumoHHom mood moa com coa on ooHuom moom\um omaouoxm moaoom mucous .u .u« m .u so .xm Sufism muwooHo> no 0602 . m mom .muouomfiumo>cw msowum> an cows masumoum mcflcamwu mo somfiummeooun.~ mummy 27 accumulation might reflect a reduced rate of glycolysis, increased oxidation of alpha—glycerophosphate, increased pyruvate oxidation, utilization of lactate in glycogen resynthesis, or removal of lactate by increased blood flow to the muscles of conditioned animals. Rawlinson and Gould (1959) swam three different age group rats daily for eight weeks for one and two 30—minute periods, and concluded from biceps femoris homogenates that the total activity of creatine phosphokinase, adenosine triphos- phatase, lactate dehydrogenase, malate dehydrogenase, and phosphorylase enzymes was not affected by either swimming program in any of the groups. Lawrie (1952) exercised rats at 2.0 ft/sec and found an increase in myoglobin with increased duration of treat- ment. Over a short period, severe exercise elicits no such response, although glycogen reserves are diminished. Hearn and Wainio (1956) found no changes in succinate dehydrogenase levels in the gastrocnemius muscle after swimming rats 30 minutes daily for up to eight weeks. The latter authors suggested that existing aerobic systems are capable of meeting stress induced by moderate exer- cise. Yakovlev gt_gt. (1963) reported that the enzymes of aerobic metabolism were the first to increase during training and the last to decrease on cessation of train— ing. I 28 Kendrick—Jones and Perry (1965, 1967) and Lamb gt gt. (1969) suggested that chronic exercise increased the capacity of skeletal muscle to work anaerobically. The previous authors noted that treadmill exercise caused an increase in hexokinase and glycogen content, and in- creased the capacity to phosphorylate glucose both during and after exercise periods. Using intense activity, Kendrick-Jones and Perry (1965, 1967) found significant increases in creatine phosphokinase and other sarc0p1asmic proteins. These authors suggested that the ability of the myofibril to split adenosine triphosphate was not as rate limiting as was the supply of adenosine triphosphate to the enzymatic center. Gollnick and King (1969) swam rats and found in— creased mitochondria in the gastrocnemius muscle. Running to exhaustion prior to sacrifice produced marked swelling (uncoupled oxidative phosphorylation) in mitochondria, whereas, swimming to exhaustion produced no such change. It seems that chronic exposure to exercise increases the oxidative capacity in some forms of activity because of the addition of more metabolic apparatus. Holloszy (1967) and Holloszy and Oscai (1969) found an increased capacity of the mitochondrial fraction from the gastrocnemius muscle to oxidize pyruvate after a strenuous program of treadmill running. Mild exercise did not effect the level of succinate dehydrogenase. Increase in both mitochondrial 29 enzymatic activity and electron transport capacity was associated with a concomitant rise in capacity to produce adenosine triphosphate. Holloszy (1967) observed a change in the mitochondrial content, and suggested that the composition of the cristae, rather than a simple uniform increase in size or number of mitochondria accounted for the increased aerobic capacity. Wilkerson and Evonuk (1971) examined calcium-activated adenosine triphosphatase of the rat gastrocnemius muscle after acute and chronic programs of swimming. The specific activity of gastroc— nemius muscle myosin ATPase was only significant when contrasting control and exhaustive programs at six and ten weeks. No difference was found for mild exercise at ten weeks. Previous failure to find significance, as Holloszy (1967) contended, might reflect the relative midlness of the program, since rats can easily perform 30 minutes of swimming. One might also speculate that adequate programs for anaerobic adaptation have not been utilized. Histochemical Studies Studies regarding histochemical changes in muscle as a result of training have steadily emerged within the last several years. In general, these studies support meta— bolic alteration of fiber type with various exercise programs. 30 Investigating the effect of two different duration running programs on hypertrOphy and transformation of fiber type in the tibialis anterior muscle, Man—i gt_gt. (1967) reported that white and red fibers hypertrophied (21% and 11%, respectively) in only the 50-day program. No evi- dence of change in distribution of various Sudan Black B fiber types with either training program was noted. Investigators (Kowalski gt gt,, 1969; Spurway and Young, 1970) using low-intensity, repetitive running and weight lifting programs supported an aerobic metabolic adaptation at the interregional fiber level. Kowalski gt_gt. (1968) found, using subjective histochemical measures, an increase in phosphorylase in weight lifting and an even greater increase in running rats. Both exer- cises resulted in equal increments for succinate dehydro— genase and cytochrome oxidase. The greatest relative rise of succinate dehydrogenase occurred in muscle fibers re- garded as predominantly anaerobic (white) only with running. In a similar study using young mice, Spurway and Young (1970) indicated that running increased the pro- portion of fibers with high succinate dehydrogenase, while weight-lifting decreased this proportion and raised the percentage of moderate fibers. The pioneering investigations (Barnard gt_gt., 1970, 1971; Edgerton gt gt., 1969, 1970; Edgerton and Simpson, 31 1969, 1971) have produced the most extensive attempts to elucidate the influence of exercise on fiber type a1ter~ ation. In an early investigation, Edgerton gt_gt. (1969) swam lOO-day-old rats for 52 days (one and two 30-minute exercise bouts each day) and found the proportion of intermediate and red fibers in the soleus muscle unaltered in oxidative enzymes, and myosin adenosine triphosphatase patterns. Moderately and heavily exercised rats showed an increase in the preportion of fibers having high in— tensity malate dehydrogenase, succinate dehydrogenase, and nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide diaphorase in the plantaris muscle (white and mixed fiber areas). Faulkner gt gt. (1971) determined the number of red and white fibers with succinate dehydrogenase from the plantaris muscle of 6-week and 45-week-old guinea pigs, subjected to low-speed, high-repetition treadmill running. Total fiber counts from the plantaris muscle revealed 14—week and 45-week animals had 20% fewer fibers than 6—week. Training for 8 weeks enhanced the oxidative capacity by increasing the number of red fibers, and prevented attrition of muscle fibers. In a later comprehensive histochemical, biochemical and physiological study, Edgerton gt gt. (1969, 1970) examined the effects of prolonged progressive, low— resistance, intermittent, repetitive exercise on gastrocnemius, plantaris and soleus muscles. The 32 5-day per week complex training program for adult male guinea pigs was progressively increased each week through 9 weeks of training (velocities ranged from 20.8 to 49.3 m/min). Guinea pigs trained to 21 weeks followed the ninth week program. After 9 weeks of training the mito— chondria isolated from gastrocnemius and plantaris muscles showed no significant adaptation, while the 18—week group showed significantly increased mitochondrial protein con- centration. The percentage of histochemically demon— strated red muscle fibers was significantly increased. No significant differences in myosin ATPase, or con— tractile properties were observed. After acute exercise, electrical stimulation of the plantaris muscle, caused selective depletion of glycogen and phosphorylase content in aerobic (red) fibers (Edger- ton gt_gt., 1970). The prOportions of phosphorylase nega— tive fibers increased with the duration of the exercise. Kugelberg and Edstrdm (1968) induced muscular contraction with low frequency stimulation and found that changes in phosphorylase and glycogen content were most pronounced in white muscle fibers, less in intermediate, and least in red muscle fibers. After one and two hours of stimu- 1ation, glycogen negative fibers were identified, but phosphorylase negative fibers were absent. Edgerton gt gt. (1970) investigated the question further using guinea pigs trained for 9 and 18 weeks. Muscular 33 contraction induced by electrical stimulation caused total phosphorylase activity to be selectively depleted in white fibers; less in trained than non-trained animals. These data suggest different effects for normally exercised and electrically stimulated muscles. The mitochondrial and glycolytic adaptations might have had a sparing effect on the metabolic characteristics. Campbell gt_gt. (1971) obtained biOpsies from the longissimus muscle of Chester white pigs trained on a treadmill at 2.2 ft/sec for two weeks, and reported an increase in the number of alkali-stabile ATPase fibers. Edgerton gt_gt. (1969) and Rawlinson and Gould (1959) using histochemical and biochemical techniques, have reported no changes in myosin adenosine triphosphatase fiber type or activity. Recently Dorn gt gt. (1970) using histochemical techniques reported an increase in glycolytic enzymes and a decrease in oxidative enzymes for fibers of the rat soleus and rectus femoris muscles after forced exercise. MATERIALS AND METHODS Experimental Animals One hundred and seventy-six normal, 72-day-old, male, albino rats (Sprague-Dawley Strain)1 were brought into the laboratory in four shipments. Each animal was randomly assigned to one of seven treatment groups and then allowed 12 days to become acclimated to laboratory conditions be— fore treatments began. Treatment Groups The seven treatment groups used in this study were as follows: Control (CON) The animals assigned to the control group received no special treatment and were housed in standard, indi- vidual, sedentary cages (24 cm. x 18 cm. x 18 cm.) during both the adjustment and treatment periods. Voluntary (VOL) The animals in the voluntary exercise group received no special treatment during either the adjustment period 1Obtained from Hormone Assay Laboratory, Chicago, Illinois. 34 35 or the treatment period but were housed in standard, indi- vidual voluntary—activity cages. These dages were identi— cal to individual sedentary cages except that the animals were allowed access to freely revolving activity wheels (13 cm. wide and 35 cm. in diameter). Individual daily records of total revolutions run (TRR) were recorded on the attached revolution counter. Short (SHT) The animals assigned to the short group were housed in individual, voluntary-activity cages during the adjust- ment period and in individual sedentary cages during the treatment period. These animals were subjected to a short-duration, high-speed endurance program of interval running. The program was progressive in nature. That is, the intensity of the program was gradually increased until on the thirty-seventh day of training, and thereafter, the animals were expected to complete eight bouts of exer- cise with 2.5 minutes of inactivity between bouts. Each bout consisted of six repetitions of 10 seconds of work alternated with 40 seconds of rest. During the work intervals, these animals ran at the relatively fast speed of 5.5 ft/sec. (for compete program, see Appendix Awl). Medium (MED) The animals in the medium group were housed under the same conditions as the SHT animals. However, the medium (MED) group was subjected to a medium-duration, 36 moderate—speed endurance program of progressive interval running. By the thirty-seventh day of training, these animals were expected to complete five 8-minute bouts of exercise with 5 minutes of inactivity between bouts. Each bout consisted of eight repetitions of 30 seconds of work alternated with 30 seconds of rest. During the work inter- vals, these animals ran at the moderate speed of 4.0 ft/sec. (for complete program, see Appendix A-2). Long (LON) The animals in the long group were housed under the same conditions as the SHT and MED groups. However, the long (LON) group was subjected to a long—duration, low— Speed endurance program of progressive interval running. By the thirty-seventh day of training, these animals were expected to complete four 12.5—minute bouts of exercise with 2.5 minutes of inactivity between bouts. Each bout consisted of one repetition of 12.5 minutes of work with no rest periods. During the work intervals, these animals ran at the slow speed of 2.0 ft/sec. (for complete pro— gram, see Appendix A—3). Electric Stimulus Control (ESC) These animals were housed in individual voluntary~ activity cages during the adjustment period and in indi- vidual sedentary cages during the treatment period. Each ESC animal was permanently paired with a short (SHT) animal. Only SHT animals were paired with an 37 electrijstimulus—control group (ESC). The SHT program was selected because these animals received slightly more shock than the animals on either of the other two forced- running programs. During the SHT animal's treatment period, the ESC animals were placed into an attached adjacent stimulus control cage (21.5 cm. long, 14 cm. wide, and 10.5 cm. high) with a grid floor comparable to that of the controlled running wheel (CRW). Each ESC animal was exposed to the same total light stimulus and electrical shock as its SHT counterpart. Swimmingg(SWM) These animals were housed in individual voluntary- activity cages during the adjustment period and in indi- vidual sedentary cages during the treatment period. Animals were swum (28 to 32°C) in individual cylindrical tanks which measured 28 cm. in diameter and 76 cm. in depth. On the last four days of the eighth week of this program, each animal was expected to swim one 60—minute bout with an attached tail weight equal to 3% of the animal's weight (for complete program, see Appendix A—4). Duration Groups To provide chronological perspective of treatment effects, animals were sacrificed at zero, four, eight, and twelve weeks after the initiation of treatments. The respective training requirements (see Appendix A-l through 38 A—4), for the four—week (20 training days), and the eight— week (40 training days) duration groups (SHT and ESC, MED, LON, and SWM) were progressively increased. The SHT and ESC, MED, LON, and SWM twelve-week groups followed their respective thirty-seventh day schedules during each of the last 23 training days (see Appendix A-l through A-4). Treatment Procedures Treatments began after a lZ—day adjustment period when all animals were 85 days of age. Animals designated as zero week control (CON) were sacrificed at the end of the adjustment period. The SHT and ESC, MED, LON, and SWM experimental treatments were conducted once a day, between 12:30 p.m. and 5:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, in the Human Energy Research Laboratory, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan. Animal body weights for SHT, MED, LON, and ESC groups were recorded before and after each treatment period. Only pretreatment dry weights were taken for SWM animals. For each animal in the VOL group, total revolutions run during the previous 24 hours were recorded, Tuesday through Friday between 10:00 a.m. and 11:00 a.m. The SHT, MED, and LON groups and one of the control treatments (ESC) received treatment in the CRW described as “ . . . a unique animal—powered wheel which is capable of inducing small laboratory animals to participate in highly Specific programs of controlled, reproducible 39 exercise" (Wells and Heusner, 1971). During the first 40-minute learning period in the CRW, the animals ran in response to shock. The low-intensity, controlled shock current was applied to the animal through the grid running surface of the wheel. By the end of the third learning period, most animals were conditioned to run in response to a light stimulus which preceded a shock stimulus. Initially, animals were placed in individually braked running wheels. For each running period a light above the wheel signaled the start of a work interval and remained on for a predetermined time, the acceleration period. Loss of the light stimulus and application of the shock stimulus occurred for animals not obtaining prescribed wheel speeds during the acceleration period. Animals running slower than the specified speed had the light and shock sequence repeated. The light was turned off and no shock current stimulus was applied for animals obtaining or exceeding prescribed wheel speed. During the work periods, the wheel was free to turn, while dur- ing the rest periods, the wheel was automatically braked to prevent spontaneous activity. A typical running pro— gram consisted of alternate work and rest periods. Total revolutions run (TRR) and cumulative duration of shock (CDS) were recorded from a controlled running wheel (CRW) attached result unit after each treatment period for SHT, MED, and LON groups while ESC used SHT values. These values, with total expected revolutions 40 (TER) and total work time (TWT) (see Appendix A), were used to calculate percent expected revolutions (PER) and percent shock free time (PSF). For the SWM group, swim time completed (STC) was recorded after each treatment period and used with expected swim time (EST) (see Appendix A-4) to calculate percent expected swim time (PET). Animal Care Since rats are normally more active at night than during daylight hours, the light sequence in the animal quarters was automatically timed to reverse the rat's active period by having the lights off between 1:00 p.m. and 1:00 a.m. Thus animals were trained during their active phase and at convenient times. Standard procedures designed to maintain a rela— tively constant environment for the animals, such as daily handling, temperature and humidity control, and regular cage cleaning, were observed. Throughout the experiment, all animals had access to water and a com— mercial animal diet1 at libitum. Sacrifice Procedures Fourteen biweekly sacrifices of seven animals of the same treatment duration were conducted from November 11, .o..- - lWayne Laboratory—810x, Allied Mills, Inc., Chicago Illinois. 41 1970 to May 24, 1971. The two initial sacrifices involved only zero week animals. For all other sacri- fices, animals were selected after their last treatment on Friday for sacrifice on the following Monday. Only animals subjectively determined in good general health were selected. Performance criteria of 75 percent ex- pected revolutions (PER) and 75 percent shock-free time (PSF) were set for the controlled running programs. Only those SHT, MED, and LON animals whose performance values were above these criteria were selected for sacrifice. Proximity to a mean percent expected swim time (PET) value of 100 was used as a sacrifice selection criteria to the original animals resulted in a final sample of 96 animals. The final cell frequencies are indicated by treatment and duration of treatment in Table 3. These sacrifices involved one CON animal plus pairs of animals from one of the following experi- mental trios; VOL-MED—LON or SWM—SHT-ESC. This sacri- fice schedule was judged most compatible with treatment schedules. Animals were weighed and then sacrificed under anesthesia by intraperitoneal injection, 4 mg/100 g body weight of Halatal1 (pentobarbital sodium 64.8 mg). 1From Jensen-Salsbery Laboratories, Division of Richardson-Merrell, Inc., Kansas City, Missouri. 42 TABLE 3.--Final cell frequencies by treatment and duration of treatment. Duration of Treatment Treatment O-week 4—week 8—week 12-week Control 2 4 4 4 Voluntary 2 4 4 4 Electric Stimulus Control 2 4 4 4 Short 2 4 4 4 Medium 2 4 4 3 Long 2 4 3 4 Swimming 2 4 4 4 43 Laparotomy, gentle rotation of the abdominal viscera, and partial removal of parietal peritoneum were performed to permit withdrawal of 1-2 ml. of blood from the caudal vena cava. After syringe exchange, 4 m1. of Pelikan ink1 were injected into the vascular system for subsequent capillary per muscle fiber calculations. After 3 minutes of 12.2122. ink circulation, the heart was removed and preserved for future study. The right hindlimb was skinned and the superficial posterior crural muscles were exposed by reflecting the overlying tissues. The right triceps surae (gastrocnemius and soleus) and plantaris muscles were removed as a unit. Similar procedures were followed for the left hindlimb except the gastrocnemius, soleus, and plantaris muscles were separated. The left tibialis anterior muscle, the nerve to the left soleus muscle and the lumbar segments of the spinal cord were also removed. Only the right triceps surae and plantaris muscles were used in the present study, the remaining tissues mentioned above were preserved for analysis by other members of the research team. Upon removal, the right triceps surae and plantaris unit was rolled in talcum powder. The unit was held with forceps and lowered, for approximately 60 seconds into 1Obtained from John Henschel and Co., Inc., Farmington, Long Island, New York. 44 pre-cooled 2-methylbutane (iSOpentane). The iSOpentane had been previously cooled to a viscous fluid (-l40 to -185°C) by liquid nitrogen. The frozen muscles were stored in aluminum 35 mm. film containers in a cryostat at -20°C until sectioning and histochemical procedures were initiated. Within 24 hours sandwich blocks (10 mm. thick) were ablated from the mid-portions of the units with a pre-cooled stainless steel knife. The sandwich blocks were frozen onto cryostat chucks using 5% gum tragacanth. Fresh—frozen, distal-proximal serial cross sections, were cut at 10 microns using a rotary microtome— cryostat.1 Sections were mounted on cover glasses and air-dried for at least one hour. Histochemical Procedures Glycogen localization was studied as described by McManus (1946) using the periodic acid-Schiff reaction (PAS). Phosphorylase (PPL) was examined by Takeuchi's (1958) method of inclusion product of polysaccharide and iodine (clathrate). Succinate dehydrogenase (SDH) locali— zation was determined using NBT2(2,2'—di-p-nitrophenyl- 5,5'-diphenyl—(3,3'-dimethoxy-4,4'—bipheny1ene)- ditetrazolium chloride) as the electron acceptor (Barka and Anderson, 1963). Intermyofibrillar adenosine 1International-Harris Microtome--Cryostat, Model CTI International (IEC) Equipment Co., Needham Heights, Mass. 2Sigma Chemical Company, St. Louis, Missouri. 45 triphosphatase (ATP) localization was investigated employ- ing the technique described by Wachstein and Meisel (1957) in calcium—formol fixed fresh frozen sections. Control sections were included periodically to verify specific localization patterns. Incubation times for SDH, ATP and PPL were 45 min, 60 min, and 180 min respectively. Mounting media for the previous sections was glycerin-jelly while PAS and hema— toxylin and eosin (H & E) sections were mounted in Histoclad. Histological Procedure Harris' alum Hematoxylin andonsin (Gridley, 1960) was applied to fresh frozen sections for morphological characteristics. Tissue Analysis Since muscle fiber pOpulations were known to be different intermuscularly and intramuscularly, specific areas of the medial gastrocnemius, plantaris, and soleus muscles were selected for study (see Figure l). The types of muscle fibers observed in control animals in the areas selected were as follows: the medial gastrocnemius muscle (area I) had high incidence of white fibers; the plantaris muscle (area II) consisted principally of red and inter— mediate fibers with occasional white fibers; and the soleus muscle (area III) had predominantly intermediate 46 fibers with red fibers interspersed. Histochemical charac— teristics are depicted for these areas in Figures 2 through 12. Histochemical Microscopic evaluation of succinate dehydrogenase (SDH), intermyofibrillar adenosine triphosphatase (ATP) phosphorylase (PPL), and glycogen (PAS) phenotypes was determined from a group of 50 adjacent muscle fibers in the three distinctive areas for each animal. To insure data collection from identical fibers, each group of 50 fibers was traced from the SDH section using a micro- projector1 at (x208) magnification. Fibers in serial sections for each histochemical procedure were identified on the original tracing and rated according to the follow- ing schema for SDH, ATP and PAS: l = dark intensity, 2 = intermediate intensity and 3 = light intensity. For PPL the schema was 1 = blue—violet color, 2 = violet—red to brown-purple color, 3 = yellow to reddish brown. Control animals were used to establish individual sacrifice standards on the basis of reaction intensity and color for the four histochemical procedures. Except for the control animals, analyses were performed without knowledge of the treatment groups. In every case, data collection was completed before the ensuing biweekly sacrifice. 1Prado Universal, Ernst Leitz GMBH Wetzlar, Germany. gag dvdlfliljill! 4 . . . .. id. 5. L:—;’—'—.—'A_L.L ; 'W“ 47 PLATE I Figures 2 through 6 are sections taken from control animals. FIGURE 1 A schematic view of the posterior superficial crural musculature. Histochemical profiles were classified from intramuscular areas identified as I, II, and III. (6X). FIGURES 2, 4, 6 Soleus. PPL, SDH, and ATP respectively. Serial sections illustrate phenotypic properties of red (a) and intermediate (b) fibers. Capillaries (Figures 2 and 6, arrows) and characteristic subsarcolemmal accumulation of diformazan parti- cles (Figure 4, arrow) are prominent. (400x). FIGURES 3, 5 Soleus. SDH and ATP, respectively. End-product localization identifying typical intermyofibrillar pattern for red (a) fiber. (500X). GAE’I‘I‘ "L‘I‘I‘LMI U.) -_ ‘ h ’f‘.\ 1 0' at! .01. y 49 PLATE II Figures 7 through 12 are sections taken from control animals. FIGURE 7 Medial gastrocnemius. SDH. The large fiber (c) with a paucity of subsarcolemmal and intermyo- fibrillar deposition of diformazan particles, is characteristic of white fibers. The intermediate fiber (b) has slight subsarcolemmal and moderate intermyofibrillar end-product deposition. (500X). FIGURES 8, 10, 12 Plantaris. SDH, ATP, and PPL, respectively. Serial sections illustrating phenotypic properties of red (a) and intermediate (b) fibers. Note the marked heterogeneity of fibers in this muscle compared to soleus (Figures 2, 4, 6). (400X). FIGURES 9, 11 Plantaris. SDH and PAS, respectively. Serial sections illustrating phenotypic properties of a red (a) fiber. (400K). 50 51 Histochemical Interpretation General synopses of the localization and reaction intensity of end-product in comparable red, intermediate and white skeletal muscle fibers are indicated in Table 4. The significance of these histochemical results can only be interpreted as relative metabolic profile character- istics brought forth by the particular procedural con- ditions. Various techniques (Padykula and Herman, 1955, 1965; Engel, 1962; Padykula and Gauthier, 1963; Gauthier and Padykula, 1965; Gauthier, 1967; Karpati and Engel, 1968a; Severson gt gt., 1968; Brooke and Engel, 1969; Farrell and Fedde, 1969; Guth and Samaha, 1969, 1970; Tice, 1969; Eversole and Standish, 1970; Meijer, 1970; Samaha gt_gt., 1970) have revealed different adenosine triphosphatase systems and enzymes. In this investigation the Wachstein- Meisel lead-precipitation technique localized predominantly intermyofibrillar ATP. The intermyofibrillar region has many membrane systems (mitochondria, sarc0plasmic reticulum, and tubular systems) which hydrolyse adenosine triphosphate or similar engery—rich compounds (creatine phosphate) to link endergonic processes to others that are exergonic. The measure for succinate dehydrogenase (SDH) was used as an indicator of an oxidation-reduction step in the tricarboxylic acid cycle. This enzyme catalyzes the flagellai. I... .- 52 asexuuu lmcasanms Amounmaa amuse IOUMMm mucosvm I o Amdmv unfinom logos cacoHuom Ac3oun AuoHoa> Inmwccou “can Ionanv .30aaom uoaow>v Susan Aacxume lmcusmfia imcesaems noose. msomswa u 0 Adams onwahuonmmonm lmcugmaa Amcesneme lflvxume muaeaonoouna . o Lasso ommumsmmonmauu enamococm umaafiuoamowauoucH lmcuemafl Amcesfleme laexumn «neoconooune n o Exams ommcomouchcoc muscAUUSm .2. .22... EN...” EN...“ unmouflumcou oumuumosm no season unannoucH uoscoumncco c0auomom HMHSHHoU manmnoum cofluoom mmouo Hmuoaoxm ouwn3 com .oumficofihoucw .Acowuoom mmouov muonau oaomsfi .oou ca poscoumlcco mo unannoucw cofiuomou can coaumuwHMOOAnl.v wands 53 removal of two hydrogens from succinate to fumarate. These electrons are carried to the electron transport system by flavin adenine dinucleotide. Histochemically, NBT served as the electron acceptor and localization occurred primarily on mitochondria membranes (Padykula, 1952; Wachstein and Meisel, 1955; Scarpelli and Pearse, 1958; Beckett and Bourne, 1960; Novikoff gt gt., 1961; Germino gt gt., 1965; Brooke and Engel, 1966; Nystrom, 1966). This aerobic measure was used as an indicator of resistance to fatigue. Glycogen (PAS) localization and reciprocal phos- phorylase (PPL) represented relative anabolic and cata— bolic processes of a control system. Phosphorylases it 2332 catalyze reactions leading to formation of glucose-l-phosphate from glycogen in the presence of phosphates. The tg'ttttg_reversibility of the reactions has been used for the histochemical demonstration of phosphorylase activity (Takeuchi and Kuriaki, 1955; Takeuchi, 1958; Takeuchi and Sasaki, 1970a, 1970b). This concentration was measured by the amount of newly formed polyglucose. These procedures taken together yield a metabolic inventory, but did not necessarily include the rate limiting steps in the various metabolic pathways. It was unlikely that the histochemical procedures examined were altered in similar fashion. 54 Statistical Procedures Data were analyzed by treatment groups and durations by (CDC 3600) computer. Calculations were performed for means, standard deviations, and simple correlation coef— ficients for training performance, environmental con- ditions, and pre- and post-treatment body weights. Since diameters of wheels attached to the voluntary-activity cages were less than CRW diameters, daily TRR values of VOL animals were multiplied by a calibration factor, 0.9163, to equate TRR values for VOL, SHT, MED, and LON groups. Mean percent values were calculated for each histo- chemical rating and the arc sine transformation (angular transformation) was applied to insure that histochemical data met the variance homogeneity assumption of analysis of variance (ANOVA) (Sokal and Rohlf, 1969). This pro— cedure was repeated for each combination of area and histochemical technique. The mean percent values were then analyzed by a two-way, fixed effects ANOVA model. Complex Scheffé contrasts were employed to determine the specific signifi— cant categories within each of the independent variables, treatment and duration of treatment. For those cate— gories which were significant, standard Scheffé con- trasts were used to identify the particular cell means responsible for the observed significance. The 55 probability of committing a Type I error (a) was set at .05 for the two-way ANOVA. The probability of committing a Type II error (8) was set at .25. Significance levels for the Scheffé tests was held at p = .20 (Scheffé, 1959; Guenther, 1964). Tit; ..fi.;en-... .11 - RESULTS Training Results Treatments On the basis of the programmed increase of total expected revolutions (TER) with duration of treatment (see Appendix A-l through A-3), animals of the long (LON) group had the largest mean daily total revolutions run (TRR) increase, medium (MED) next, and short (SHT) the least. Figure B-4 (see Appendix B), shows that, on the basis of mean daily TRR, the SHT, MED, and LON animals met their respective program requirements. Mean daily TRR of voluntary (VOL) animals did not display a con- sistent position relative to the programmed running groups for the first five weeks of training although a definite trend toward a position between the SHT and MED groups was evident from six to twelve weeks. This obser- vation was limited in that the speed and duration of wheel revolutions run by VOL animals cannot be equated to those of SHT, MED, and LON animals. Figures B-l, B—2, and B—3 (see Appendix B) show that SHT, MED, and LON animals generally maintained 56 57 percent expected revolution (PER) values above 80, thus exceeding the criterion PER level, 75, of acceptable execution of program requirements. This level of per— formance compared favorably with other groups of animals subjected to similar training programs (Ruhling, 1970). Figures 8—1, B-2, and B—3 also show that the animals generally responded to light, rather than electrical shock, stimuli. Comparisons across treatment duration of percent shock free time (PSF) values for SHT, MED and LON groups showed that SHT animals and their electric stimulus control (ESC) received the most electrical shock. Almost without exception, percent expected swim time (PET) values for swimming (SWM) animals were 100 (Table B-2, see Appendix B). Therefore, PET was not plotted across duration of SWM treatment. Treatment Environment and Eddy Weight Values Table B-1 (see Appendix B) shows that SHT, MED, and LON animals were exercised under conditions of relatively constant air temperature and barometric pressure and low humidity. These values did not affect PER and PSF as reflected in the low correlations among these parameters. However, animals with relatively high pre-treatment body weights tended to display low PER and PSF. Animals show- ing relatively large weight losses tended to display high PER and PSF. The high correlation coefficient between PER 58 and PSF (Table B-1) confirmed the nearly parallel plot of these values in Figures B-l, B-2, and B-3 (see Appendix B). The SWM animals (Table B-2, see Appendix B) were exercised under environmental conditions, including water temperature, comparable to those of SHT, MED, and LON animals. None of these conditions or pre-treatment body weight values were highly correlated with PET. Histochemical Results Individual mean percent values of histochemical 'ratings are tabulated in Appendix C by animal number, treatment and duration of treatment. The cell mean percent values of histochemical ratings are depicted by treatment and duration of treatment in Figures E-l through E-3 (see Appendix E) for the muscles examined. Overall Analysis of Variance for Sin"1 Percent Histochemical Fiber Ratings.--The overall two-way analysis of variance by area, histochemical procedure and rating are located in Tables D—l through D—3 (see Appendix D). Complex and Standard Scheffé Analysis for Sin"1 Percent Histochemical Ratings.-—Complex and standard Scheffé contrasts for specific dependent category variable 59 differences within the two independent variables, treat- ment and duration of treatment1 are located in Tables 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9, 10, ll, 12, respectively. The prominence of duration, as well as treatment effects, suggested that the seven different chronic physical activities had specific effects upon the metabolic characteristics, but the effects were highly time dependent. Medial Gastrocnemius.——The presence of significant treatment-duration effects of exercise were evident at four, eight, and twelve weeks. Similar SDH and ATP changes occurred for VOL at four weeks, and for LON at eight weeks with ATP and at twelve weeks with SDH. In— creases in PAS were found in CON, SHT, MED, and VOL. This effect occurred for CON and SHT at four weeks, for MED at eight weeks, and VOL at twelve weeks. The SHT and SWM groups showed a training effect with PAS measure at four weeks. Increases in the percentage of intermediate phosphorylase fibers was seen for ESC at four weeks, and for MED at eight weeks; while the ESC treatment reverted to control percentages of phosphorylase fibers at eight and twelve weeks. Similar ATP changes appeared at twelve weeks for MED and SWM. 1The animals assigned to zero week had received no experimental treatment. Differences between dependent categories were not significant. Dependent category values were pooled, disregarding treatment assignment, to increase the power of the Scheffé contrasts within duration of treatment. These animals were designated as zero week CON (N = 14). 60 TABLE 5.--Summary of Scheffé contrasts for area/histo— chemical Sin'l percent ratings within duration. Duration (wk) Area Rating Histochgmical roce ure 4 8 12 Medial 1 SDH S S N Gastroc— 2 SDH N N N nemius 3 SDH N N N 1 ATP N S N 2 ATP N N N 3 ATP N N N 1 PPL S N N 2 PPL S N N 3 PPL N N N 1 PAS S N S 2 PAS S N N 3 PAS N N S Plantaris l SDH N N N 2 SDH N N N 3 SDH N N N 1 ATP N N N 2 ATP N N N 3 ATP N N N 1 PPL N N N 2 PPL N N N 3 PPL N N N l PAS N N N 2 PAS N N N 3 PAS N N N Soleus 1 SDH N N N 2 SDH N N N 3 SDH N N N 1 ATP N N N 2 ATP N N N 3 ATP N N N 1 PPL N N N 2 PPL N N N 3 PPL N N N l PAS N N N 2 PAS N N N 3 PAS N N N N = Not significant; 8 = Significant at .20 level. .om. um mcfiumu\muocoooum HMUHEocoouman cm>wm w you mumofim mo mmmucmouom ca ommouocfl u +m low. as mcflumu\muscoooum HMOHEocooumwc cm>flm o How muooflm mo mmmucmouom ca wmmmuooc n um "puma ou unmfiu mummuucoo Wummcom unmowmacmflm mcflummuucoo .ucmoflmacmfim #02 u z 61 SKmnvmm EZmIZOA UmMIZOA 23mlom2 0mmlam2 ZOAIQMZ ZZmIBmm Ummlemm ZOAIBmm DmSIBmm 23mlqo> Ummlqo> ZOAIAO> QmEIAO> Bmmldo> 23MIZOU UmmIZOU ZOAIZOU omSIZOU BmmIZOU AO>IZOU + I l I l ZZZZUJZZZZUJZZZUJZZCDZZZU) l (DZZZZZCDZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ ZZZZZUJZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ ZUJZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ ZZZZCDZZZZUJZZZCDZZUJZZZUJ + m m H m N H m m H m N H mcflumm mam Add mam mom musomooum ammuucou wmmmnom Hmowaonooumam .oaomoE m5ancoouummm Hmwcoe ca mxoo3 noon um muamEumouu ucmoHMHsmwm SHHMOHumHumum Mom moneys“ unmoumm Assam HMOHEmsooumfln How mummuucoo wmmmnow mo mumEEsmll.m names .om. um mcflumu\ouscmooum HmOHEocoouch co>Hm m How mumowm mo ommucooumm cw ommouocfi u +m “om. um wcflumu\ouocoooum Hecafiosooumwc cm>fim o How muoofim mo mmmucoouom ca mmmouomc u um "puma ou Dames mummuucoo wmmocom ucmoHMHcmHm mcflummupcou .ucmoflmacmfim uoz n z 62 EZmIUmm ZZmIZOA UmMIZOA ZZmIDMZ Ummlamz ZOAIQQZ SKmIBmm Emmlem ZOAIBmm szlamm 23mIAO> Ummldo> ZOAIQO> QmZIQO> Bmmlqo> ZZmIZOU UmmIZOU ZOAIZOU QHZIZOU BEmIZOU AO>IZOU ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZWZ ZZZZZZZZZWZZZZZZZZZZZ magnum m N r-l m N v-l M N H m N H mMH CO m 0 O mam qmm mas mom musomooum u u 0 .mm a m HMOflEmcooumflm .waomse mofiEocoouummm Hoacoa ca mxoos unmwo um mucoEummuu BGMOHMAcmHm haemofiumflumum How mmcflumu ucooumm Hucflm Hmoaaonooumwc you mummuucoo wmmocom mo mumEEdmll.h Manda .om. um mcwumn\ouocoooum HmoHEmnoouman co>am o How muonwm mo mmmucooumm CH ommmuoca u +m “om. um mcwumu\ouocwooum HmoHEonooumHn co>Hm m mom muooflw mo ommucooumm ca ummmuooc u um "puma ou ucmHu mummuucoo wmmonom unmoHMHsmwm msHummuucou .ucmofimwcwfim uoz u z 63 SSmIUmm ZBmIZOA Ummlzoq SSmIQmS UmWIQmE ZOAIQMS EBmIBmm UmmIBmm ZOAIBmm QmZIBmm 23mlqo> UmMIQO> ZOAIAO> OmSIAO> 9mmlqo> EZmIZOU UmNIZOU ZOQIZOU DleZOU BmmIZOU AO>IZOU + ZZZZZZZCDZCDZZZZZZZZZZZ + ZZZZZZZCDZWZZZZZZZZZZZ m m H m m H m N H m m H maHumm mdm qmm mfié mam mudvmooum ummuucou Wmmwnom HmowEmnooumwm .oaomoa msHEmcoouummm HchoE cw mxoo3 m>am3u um mucoEummuu unmoHMHcmHm >HHm0flumwumum mom mmcaumu usoouom anwm HMUHEonooumws MOM mummuusoo wmmmnom mo mumEESmIa.m mamas 64 TABLE 9.--Summary of Scheffé contrasts for area/histochemical Sin"1 percent ratings within duration of treatment. — - A -—-_- m “—3- Treatment Group CON VOL SHT MED LON ESC SWM Medial Gastrocnemius l SDH N s N N N N N 2 SDH N N N N S N N 3 SDH N S N N S N N 1 ATP N S N N S N N 2 ATP N N N N N N S 3 ATP N N N S S S N 1 PPL N N N N N S N 2 PPL N N N S N S N 3 PPL N N N N N S N 1 PAS S S N S N N N 2 PAS S N N N N N N 3 PAS N S N N N N N Plantaris l SDH N N N N N N N 2 SDH N N N N N N N 3 SDH N N N N N N N 1 ATP N N S N N N N 2 ATP N N S N N N N 3 ATP N S N N N S S 1 PPL N N N N N N N 2 PPL N N N N N N N 3 PPL N N N N N N N 1 PAS N N N N N N S 2 PAS S N N N S N N 3 PAS N N N N N N S Soleus 1 SDH N N N N S N N 2 SDH N N N N S N N 3 _SDH N N N N N N N 1 ATP N N N N N S N 2 ATP N S N N N S N 3 ATP N N N N N N N l PPL N N N N N N N 2 PPL N N N N N N N 3 PPL N N N N N N N 1 PAS N N N N S S N 2 PAS N N N N N N N 3 PAS N S N N N S S N I Not significant; S = Significant at .20 level. 65 TABLE lO.--Summary of Scheffé contrasts for histochemical Sin-l statistically significant duration of treatment in medial gastrocnemius muscle. Histochemical Scheffé Contrast Procedure SDH ATP percent ratings for PPL PAS Rating 1 2 3 CON-OWK CON-OWN CON-OWK CON-4WK CON-4WK CON-BWK CON-4WK CON-BWK CON-IZWR CON-BWK CON-IZWK CON’IZWK VOL-OWN VOL-OWN VOL-OWN VOL-4WK VOL-4WK VOL-BWK VOL-4WK 5+ 5- VOL-SWK N VOL-IZWK N VOL-awn S- VOL-lZWK s- VOL-IZWK N 203222 201222 zzzmzz U) I MED-OWN MED-OWN MED-OWK MED-4WK MED-4WK MED-BWK MED-4WK . MED-BWK MED-IZWK MED-BWK MED-IZWK MED-IZWK 2220122 2222012 2222022 LON-OWK LON-OWN LON-OWK LON-4WK LON-CNN LON-BWX LON-4WK N N LON-8WK N N LON-IZWK 8+ 5- LON-BWK N N LON-12WK 5+ 5- LON-lZWK N N 22012012 2222012 ESC-OWN ESC-OWN ESC-OWN ESC-4WK ESC-4WK ESC*BWK ESC-4WK ESC-8WK ESC-IZWK ESC-BWK ESC-12W! ESC-IZWK 0) + 0) I 222220) SWM-OWK SWM-OWN SWM-OWN SWM-4WK SWM-4WK SWM-8W! SWM-4WK SWM-BWK SWM-IZWK SWM-BWK SWM-IZWK SWM-IZWK 2220322 N: Not significant Contrasting significant Scheffé contrasts right to left: percentage of fibers for a given histochemical procedure/rating at .20; 5+ a increase in percentage of fibers for a given histochemical procedure/rating at .20. S- a decrease in 66 TABLE ll.--Summary of Scheffé contrasts for histochemical Sin.l percent ratings for statistically significant duration of treatment in plantaris muscle. —‘ u I! -"- .1» la t (3.44.; a. uwm~.b.&1.m ~cnu-m -- --1.__‘x Am __‘. L .. . Histochemical Scheffe Contrast Procedure SDH ATP PPL PAS Rating 1 2 3 l 2 3 l 2 3 CON-OWN CON-4WK N CON-OWK CON-BWK N CON-OWN CON-IZWK S- CON-4WK CON-BWK N CON-4WK CON-12WK S- CON-SWK CON-12WK S- VOL-OWK VOL-4WK S+ VOL-OWK VOL-BWK N VOL-OWK VOL-lZWK N VOL-4WK VOL-BWK N VOL-4WK VOL-IZWK S- VOL-SWK VOL-IZWK N SHT-OWN SHT-4WK N N SHT-OWN SHT-BWK N N SHT-OWK SHT-lZWK N N SHT-4WK SHT—8WK N N SHT-4WK SHT-IZWK 5- 8+ SHT-OWN SHT-IZWK N N LON-OWN LON-4WK S+ LON-OWK LON-8WK N LON-OWK LON-IZWK N LON-4WK LON-BWK N LON-4WK LON-IZWK N LON-OWN LON-12WK N ESC-OWN ESC-4WK N ESC-OWK ESC-8WK N ESC-OWN ESC-12WK 5+ ESC-4WK ESC-BWK N ESC-4WK ESC-lZWK N ESC-8WK ESC-lZWK N SWM-OWN SMW-4WX N S S- SWM-OWK SWM-BWK N N N SWM-OWK SWM-lZWK 5+ N N SWM-4WK SWM-BWK N N N SWM-4WK SWM-IZWK N N N SWM-BWK SWM~12WK N N N N = Not significant. Contrasting significant Scheffé contrasts right to left: 5- = decrease in percentage of fibers for a given histochemical procedure/rating at .20; S- = increase in percentage of fibers for a given histochemical procedure/rating at .20. 67 TABLE l2.--Summary of Scheffé contrasts for histochemical Sin-l percent ratings for statistically significant duration of treatment in soleus muscle. Histochemical Scheffé Contrast Procedure SDH ATP PPL PAS Rating 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 3 VOL-OWK VOL-4WK N S- VOL-OWK VOL-BWK S N VOL-OWK VOL-IZWK N N VOL-4WK VOL-SWK N 5+ VOL-4WK VOL-12WK N N VOL-BWK VOL-IZWK N N LON-OWK LON-«WK N N N LON-OWK LON-BWK N N N LON-OWK LON-IZWK S+ 5- S LON-4WR LON-BWK N N N LON-4WK LON-IZWK S+ S- N LON-BWK LON-IZWK N N N ESC-OWK ESC-4WK S- S N N ESC-OWK ESC-BWK N N S S- ESC-OWK ESC-IZWK N N N N ESC-4WK ESC-BWK N N N N ESC-4WK ESC-IZWK S+ N N N ESC-BWK ESC-IZWK N N N N SWM-OWK SWM-4WK N SWM-OWK SWM-BWK S- SWM-OWK SWM-IZWK N SWM-4WK SWM-BWK N SWM-4WK SWM-IZWK N SWM-BWK SWM-IZWK N N a Not significant. Contrasting significant Scheffé contrasts right to left: 3- - decrease in percentage of fibers for a given histochemical procedure/rating .20; 5+ = increase in percentage of fibers for a given histochemical procedure/rating .20. 68 Plantaris.--None of the Scheffé contrasts within the duration groups for category variables were significant. Between durations similar PAS changes were found at four weeks for LON and SWM. ESC and SWM groups produced sig- nificant increase in the percentage of low ATP fibers at twelve weeks, while VOL produced the same result at four weeks. The CON showed a change in the percentage of intermediate PAS fibers at twelve weeks. The SHT group activity produced a significant increase in the percentage of intermediate ATP fibers from four to twelve weeks. Soleus.--None of the Scheffé contrasts within the duration groups for category variables were significant. Between durations the LON endurance group required twelve weeks to produce a directly related change in SDH and PAS. Similar PAS changes occurred for VOL at four and eight weeks. VOL activity produced a significant increase in the percentage of intermediate ATP fibers at eight weeks. Similar changes were produced in the ESC group at four weeks but such changes were reversed at twelve weeks. General Patterns of Metabolic Response.--The promi- nence of duration, as well as treatment, effects sug- gested further insight into category variables for rela— tive analysis of the regional, temporal and specific response to identical and diverse physiologic stimuli. Frequency weighted scores were calculated (frequency of fibers times the intensity rating of the enzyme or 69 substrate). These cell weighted values are presented by area, treatment and duration in Figure 13. 70 mad oco odd de< .Iom 5. E958; .0 c9350 96 EmEBmF .094 .5 um.cmmm._n. .808 9356.5. 856m. 59“. .o .8538... it: musmfim 0mm 020;. 5.3.9.5. FmOIm >m< ZDJO> 1. #4me 02.22.26 .510 2E0 3&0 Emu F Omkzoo 33. N. 0 V O N. w v 0 N. o c O N. G v 0 N. D Q 0 N. w v o N o v O .130 by h P P b P P i? r L P b r bi n i? b b b N b P b b If P P b 4on— |°\\\‘\° \\\\\° \\§“Iu|° \\\b \‘b!! \\\b \\\\ III \\\b Q‘|‘IQI||567!!I6 i OI\\\|°\\\\ 9!!! \\\q \\ b"'I-5‘\ q\ !!<\ q II<\ 901110-Ilv II: 100. o.|l.6 mma .coum com: oz manoeuo> mcowuoamuuoo mHmem .mmsoum mood one anome .uuonm wow mosao> unmams >000 0cm ucmscoww>cm ucmfiummwaii.wim mqmda 112 .mHmecm Ham now mmmo mcwcfimuu Hmuoam ewa.o mao.o mmo.o- moo.o meo.ou mn.w m.mm use 9mm ewo.o meo.o mmw.o mma.o wm.me o.owm she Amo .umz zoom .ummualmum mmm.ou mow.os moo.o ma.m e.mm~ she Ammeeo .mmmum .me omH.o mmw.o we.w m.Hw wee aufiowesm m maa.ou me.a m.ww she Ao.o .mea HH¢ me.o m.Hm use Aooo .mEma Hmumz .umS moon .mmmum muflvfle .mEmB .msma .ummusnmum .umm lam a Mad umumz .>ma .cmum cmmz mz manmflum> mcofiumamuuou mHmEHm .msoum mcaEEa3m How mmzam> unmam3 avon new ucoecoufi>cm usmfiummuall.wum mamma 113 50% 36 .2 E8. mszgoam 8886 E8 an. e6 Em“: 2.: as“. .695 28 an 2.8 coozsséum 833m __« N. no "T 0..“ 1||1cT| n6 MoTI_ o.e H*l_ nu M¢Tl_ on Mil... n. 33:: 1_w> cm 0. n _ __ _ o. _ m _ o _ s _ o _ .x; 2.45 no 0.0. 9. cc on on ow 0w 9 >3 2.45 F- - P P P b P p P p n p P L Lr _ - PL P P P h p p b PL P p p p p p _ p p — h P P — p h p p h - h — P — — P P — p b r H H 1 v e om r . . . 1 cc 1 0 o I o o O o o O o o O o o c l d 00.1 . . . . . . 18 d 3 . . . . S H . . .3 r .1 cc. 1 . . 1 9. T . 1 om. r . . 1 om r 1 Om. I 1 8 I 1 8w r 1 oo. git-7k .. '3 .171r1111 ml .. u H] .4 .1. . 1 ._ 51.. . .w 0—‘0 83d 114 2282 2&0 5. Ema: 223.031 8.83m 28 3n. e8 Ewe 2:: out x85 38 5a 2.8 c8211.w1m 33E j o.e "W on IvTI on lle_n.~ leoW «T10. 33:: 15> w. w _ on n _ __ _ o. _ m _ m _ s _ m _ n _ e _ m .xz 2.3: n on me oe an on ow ow n. o. 0 >3 2.5: t _ p h b h h _ h _ _ _ _ _ p p p _ _ _ _ _ _ p _ _ b _ _ _ _ _ _ _ p _ _ _ h _ . _ _ p h _ _ _ _ _ h _ _ b _ _ _ _ _ h H 00 1. . . . .1 0v 8_ 1 . . . . 1 on d . S A 8. 1 . . 1 8 H 03 1 1 oh oo. 1 1 8 om. 1 , 1 om 8w 1 g 8. 115 , Huler-Ikdn 1 I1. 133 yr ALI—Hf»; 023 2,8 .2 Ema: 293.9% 8.89m E8 Ea uco Emn: me; 3; 62m E8 5a :60 c8: 11.m1m 9.33m r ed 11..» n. 33:: .d> _4 w. _ _ _ _ o. _ m _ m _ s _ w _ n _ e _ m _ w _ _ .xs .235 00 on On me O? on 0» mm ON 0 _ o _ m >40 2.3: P P r P PL P P P F P P P P P 1? P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P L P P P P P P L P P P P P P P P P P P P P. 1P a E om 1 1 oe 'I I1 d 8. 1 . . . . . . . . . 1 8 d 3 o o O o o o o O o o n O C c o S no 0 o o o o o o o o o I: H 8. 1 . . . . . . 1 om H o! 1 1 o» 8. 1 1 om I L om. 1 1 om r 1 8N r L 00. 116 0204 v5 53.0%.. .PmOIm imo v8 >m .2 Ext cam 20:233.... .28. 360 comfiunéum 0.»:va w. I .o. m o w. m n v n w . .23 2.4m.— ow on On me. ov mm On ow ON 0. o. n >40 .23...» FL..~.L__F.___...._P......_....p._._...__._.____.___.p____.rH 1% 8.. 18m ..P. . 18m ..H109. 00m 00m 1 ‘2 .17 «h b ‘V . 4;“ ,J 1’ ¢> z. \‘ «(a ‘9 ,A 51‘ ’ l 1 am 1.000. x 1 8m. w, h\ 4.94 108. fa . 100! b1 ’ 000. 0161‘ s A... \ 10.1% b/ b, ‘ x p L act .5) I 204 9116 a! 0.11.. 2.0.3 I APPENDIX C HISTOCHEMICAL FIBER TYPE RAW DATA 117 TABLE C—1.--Histochemica1 ratings for medial gastrocnemius muscle presented by animal number, treatment, and duration. Phenotypic Rating/Histochemical Procedure Animal Treat- Dur. Number ment (Wk.) 1 2 3 SDH ATP PPL PAS SDH ATP PPL PAS SDH ATP PPL PAS 006 1 0 02 00 47 05 10 06 03 45 38 44 00 00 009 1 0 02 00 47 05 10 06 03 45 38 44 00 00 002 1 4 00 00 45 07 10 07 05 40 40 43 00 03 053 1 4 00 00 49 49 02 02 00 00 48 48 00 00 100 1 4 00 00 49 49 02 02 00 00 48 48 00 00 140 1 4 00 00 49 32 04 02 00 18 46 48 00 00 005 1 8 04 01 49 24 00 05 01 22 46 44 00 04 052 1 8 00 00 49 03 01 04 01 47 49 46 00 00 099 1 8 01 01 45 37 03 03 05 13 46 46 00 00 139 1 8 05 05 45 34 00 12 05 12 45 33 00 04 003 1 12 03 01 45 12 05 16 05 35 42 33 00 02 051 1 12 03 01 45 13 05 16 05 35 42 33 00 02 098 1 12 02 00 48 39 04 02 02 11 44 48 00 00 138 1 12 00 00 49 24 11 06 00 26 39 44 00 00 007 2 0 01 00 41 07 05 05 09 31 45 45 00 12 057 2 01 00 41 07 05 05 09 21 45 45 00 12 069 2 4 10 07 40 29 25 18 09 14 15 25 01 07 070 2 4 10 07 40 29 25 18 09 14 15 25 01 07 147 2 4 00 00 49 12 03 03 00 38 47 47 00 00 149 2 4 10 07 40 29 25 18 09 14 15 25 01 07 064 2 8 00 09 41 15 13 07 09 35 38 34 00 00 068 2 8 00 06 42 07 09 05 08 43 41 39 00 00 148 2 8 00 00 41 24 07 16 09 26 43 34 00 00 150 2 8 01 01 39 30 18 18 10 19 31 31 01 01 062 2 12 00 00 45 43 04 04 05 07 46 46 00 00 072 2 12 00 00 45 43 04 04 05 07 46 46 00 00 145 2 12 00 00 49 28 11 09 00 22 39 41 00 00 152 2 12 00 00 49 28 22 24 00 22 38 26 00 00 055 3 0 08 00 38 24 09 13 12 26 24 22 29 00 058 3 0 02 03 49 15 13 17 01 32 35 30 00 03 014 3 4 00 00 43 11 04 08 07 39 46 42 00 00 015 3 4 00 00 49 13 05 08 00 37 45 42 00 00 107 3 4 00 00 41 05 49 31 09 45 00 19 00 00 108 3 4 00 00 34 05 20 18 16 45 30 30 00 00 020 3 8 00 00 44 06 06 08 06 44 44 42 00 00 022 3 8 00 00 47 15 27 17 03 35 23 34 00 00 106 3 8 15 05 25 27 08 23 22 19 27 22 03 04 110 3 8 07 07 25 21 16 22 22 27 27 21 03 02 018 3 12 15 05 25 27 08 23 22 19 27 22 03 03 021 3 12 00 00 29 12 15 01 21 38 35 49 00 00 101 3 12 00 00 49 28 06 01 01 24 44 49 00 00 104 3 12 00 00 49 26 06 01 00 24 44 49 00 00 059 4 0 01 00 49 03 06 06 00 47 43 44 00 00 011 4 0 00 00 49 27 13 06 00 15 37 44 00 08 074 4 4 00 00 40 14 09 09 10 36 41 41 00 00 077 4 4 00 00 40 12 14 14 10 38 36 36 00 00 154 4 4 00 00 49 19 03 01 01 31 47 49 00 00 159 4 4 00 00 49 19 03 01 00 31 47 49 00 00 118 TABLE C-1.-~Continued. .P'L—LJ;-- -2 J lg- = ' ‘ - . Phenotypic Rating/Histochemical Procedure Animal Treat- Dur. Number ment (Wk.) 1 2 3 SDH ATP PPL PAS SDH ATP PPL PAS SDH ATP PPL PAS 075 4 8 00 00 44 23 15 22 06 25 35 28 00 02 080 4 8 01 01 44 23 14 21 05 25 35 28 01 02 162 4 8 00 00 45 30 06 22 05 20 44 28 00 00 164 4 8 01 01 29 27 19 23 21 23 30 26 00 00 073 4 12 00 27 33 30 15 22 17 20 35 01 00 00 076 4 12 03 07 38 12 06 40 12 38 41 03 00 00 153 4 12 00 00 49 00 15 16 00 25 35 34 00 25 010 5 0 02 00 47 05 10 06 03 45 38 44 00 00 056 5 0 00 00 41 07 05 05 09 31 45 45 00 12 088 5 4 00 00 31 18 21 19 19 32 29 31 00 00 089 5 4 00 16 20 16 19 29 25 12 31 05 05 11 170 5 4 03 00 29 24 08 12 21 22 39 38 00 04 172 5 4 00 00 47 25 06 07 03 25 44 43 00 00 091 5 8 06 08 43 20 12 08 07 24 32 34 00 06 092 5 8 00 26 41 03 20 22 09 42 30 02 00 05 166 5 8 00 11 31 31 25 33 10 15 25 06 09 04 085 5 12 01 10 35 26 49 00 15 24 00 40 00 00 095 5 12 04 30 37 23 46 20 13 27 00 00 00 00 171 5 12 00 00 38 26 12 14 12 21 38 36 00 03 176 5 12 00 00 45 22 12 17 05 23 38 33 00 05 012 6 0 00 00 49 16 18 Ol 00 34 32 45 49 00 060 6 0 00 00 49 25 05 01 00 25 45 49 00 00 026 6 4 00 09 09 14 11 00 40 23 39 41 01 03 027 6 4 00 09 09 14 11 00 40 23 39 41 01 03 119 6 4 00 00 09 29 05 49 40 21 45 00 01 00 120 6 4 00 00 46 29 04 08 04 21 46 42 00 00 032 6 8 05 01 41 30 08 17 08 19 37 32 01 01 034 6 8 05 01 41 30 08 17 08 19 37 32 01 01 118 6 8 05 01 41 30 08 17 08 19 37 32 01 01 122 6 8 05 01 41 30 08 17 08 19 37 32 01 01 030 6 12 04 03 39 19 11 32 11 31 35 15 00 00 033 6 12 04 03 39 19 11 32 ll 31 35 16 00 00 113 6 12 00 00 49 00 00 00 00 30 49 49 01 20 116 6 12 00 03 47 13 14 32 00 34 36 15 03 03 008 7 0 00 00 49 20 11 00 00 30 39 49 00 00 054 7 05 07 39 25 10 12 05 21 30 31 06 04 041 7 4 00 00 35 12 17 17 14 37 33 33 01 01 046 7 4 00 00 35 12 17 17 14 37 33 33 01 01 135 7 4 00 08 41 26 11 24 09 24 39 18 00 00 136 7 4 00 00 47 17 02 02 03 33 48 48 00 00 045 7 8 00 00 46 29 13 12 14 21 37 38 00 00 047 7 8 00 00 46 29 13 12 04 21 37 38 00 00 131 7 8 00 00 30 27 09 14 20 21 41 36 00 02 132 7 8 00 00 42 23 01 03 07 27 49 47 01 00 037 7 12 00 00 43 49 06 07 07 01 44 43 00 00 038 7 12 06 08 36 45 O9 40 14 05 35 02 00 00 125 7 12 00 00 45 00 22 22 02 44 28 28 03 06 126 7 12 13 04 40 20 12 25 10 30 25 21 00 00 LEGEND: l = Dark staining intensity; 2 = Medium staining intensity; 3 = Light staining intensity; SDH = Succinate dehydrogenase; ATP = Intermyo- fibrillar adenosine triphosphatase; PPL = Phosphorylase; PAS = Periodic Acid-Schiff. 'Ill'llillull 119 TABLE C-2.-—Histochemica1 ratings for plantaris muscle presented by animal number, treatment, and duration. Phenotypic Rating/Histochemical Procedure Animal Treat- Our. 1 Number ment (Wk.) 2 3 SDH ATP PPL PAS SDH ATP PPL PAS SDH ATP PPL PAS 006 1 0 24 17 19 10 21 21 21 31 05 12 10 09 009 1 0 07 16 28 11 35 34 16 27 08 00 06 12 002 1 4 25 13 15 17 23 35 24 31 02 02 11 12 053 1 4 19 19 32 11 28 31 12 34 03 00 06 05 100 1 4 26 28 22 19 16 17 21 30 08 05 07 01 140 1 4 25 12 32 16 24 35 11 30 01 03 07 04 005 1 8 24 18 24 03 22 24 21 42 04 08 05 05 042 1 8 23 20 24 07 21 25 23 31 06 05 03 12 099 l 8 24 16 35 22 23 32 19 23 03 02 06 05 139 1 8 24 16 35 22 23 32 09 23 03 02 06 05 003 1 12 19 12 28 24 31 37 15 15 00 01 07 11 051 1 12 19 12 28 24 31 37 15 15 00 01 07 11 098 1 12 24 15 28 25 26 35 09 07 00 00 13 18 138 1 12 14 17 34 24 28 25 13 16 08 08 03 10 007 2 0 12 07 27 13 36 41 13 33 08 02 10 14 057 2 24 23 23 16 26 27 25 24 00 00 02 10 069 2 4 21 16 27 12 27 24 14 36 02 10 09 02 070 2 4 30 18 34 00 18 19 11 30 02 13 05 20 147 2 4 27 15 33 28 23 31 12 20 00 04 05 02 149 2 4 28 23 22 17 22 22 24 28 00 05 04 05 064 2 8 26 17 29 00 23 29 15 22 01 04 06 28 068 2 8 23 21 24 22 21 22 22 22 06 07 04 06 148 2 8 29 26 21 16 19 22 22 33 02 02 07 01 150 2 8 18 20 28 26 32 28 16 18 00 02 06 06 062 2 12 22 22 22 24 28 28 22 21 00 00 06 05 072 2 12 28 26 20 16 22 24 23 29 00 00 07 05 145 2 12 24 24 21 19 22 21 18 29 04 05 11 02 152 2 12 20 11 21 19 26 34 18 29 04 05 11 02 058 3 0 22 15 28 23 23 35 15 20 05 00 07 07 055 3 0 24 22 29 00 26 28 21 30 00 00 00 20 014 3 4 24 21 16 00 26 29 27 43 00 00 07 07 015 3 4 19 18 28 10 30 32 18 25 01 00 04 15 107 3 4 23 21 24 20 27 29 18 26 00 00 08 04 108 3 4 25 22 26 19 22 25 18 18 03 03 06 13 020 3 8 09 16 19 11 41 34 27 37 00 00 04 02 022 3 8 29 19 29 24 21 31 17 26 00 00 04 00 106 3 8 25 14 28 26 24 35 15 20 01 01 07 04 110 3 8 18 06 35 19 29 41 11 23 03 03 04 08 018 3 12 13 10 31 21 37 40 14 19 00 00 05 10 021 3 12 16 07 25 16 33 42 22 34 01 01 03 00 101 3 12 17 07 37 27 31 42 07 16 02 01 06 07 104 3 12 17 07 37 27 31 42 07 16 02 01 16 07 011 4 0 19 17 26 21 17 13 19 23 14 20 05 06 059 4 0 24 21 32 20 26 29 18 27 00 00 00 03 074 4 4 24 22 15 12 26 28 21 38 00 00 14 00 077 4 4 20 16 17 12 29 27 30 22 01 07 03 16 154 4 4 31 17 29 17 19 33 15 11 00 00 06 22 159 4 4 27 12 29 17 22 36 15 11 01 02 06 22 075 4 8 41 20 16 16 09 24 28 19 00 06 06 15 080 4 8 27 18 26 28 23 31 19 11 00 01 05 11 162 4 8 22 13 28 23 28 32 17 19 00 15 05 08 1|! 4|. l|l1l||l! .‘Ilull 120 TABLE C-2.-—Continued. Phenotypic Rating/Histochemical Procedure Animal Treat- Our. 1 2 3 Number ment (Wk.) SDH ATP PPL PAS SDH ATP PPL PAS SDH ATP PPL PAS 164 4 8 37 15 99 18 16 32 99 12 07 03 99 20 073 4 12 34 22 24 99 16 28 22 99 00 00 04 99 076 4 12 37 23 14 17 10 26 25 33 03 01 11 00 153 4 12 14 13 31 28 34 35 11 14 02 02 08 08 010 5 0 27 11 24 07 23 39 18 34 00 00 08 09 056 5 0 16 13 28 24 34 37 11 19 00 00 11 07 088 5 4 23 24 12 13 27 26 27 00 00 00 11 37 089 5 4 25 24 17 17 25 26 21 28 00 00 12 15 170 5 4 29 13 26 14 17 36 19 29 04 01 05 07 172 5 4 27 43 26 35 20 11 18 06 03 36 06 09 091 5 8 17 16 14 22 18 23 30 16 15 11 06 12 092 5 8 35 23 23 06 14 26 18 41 01 01 09 03 166 5 8 22 14 32 26 28 36 15 14 00 00 03 10 085 5 12 04 30 37 23 46 20 13 27 00 00 00 00 095 5 12 37 20 18 20 12 30 26 30 00 00 06 00 171 5 12 09 14 30 21 41 32 10 22 00 04 10 07 176 5 12 15 14 21 26 31 32 21 13 04 04 08 11 012 6 0 19 19 22 09 25 31 18 32 16 00 10 09 060 6 0 20 16 27 07 30 34 15 34 00 00 08 09 026 6 4 16 14 16 20 34 36 22 21 00 00 12 09 027 6 4 16 14 16 20 34 36 22 21 00 00 12 09 119 6 4 25 12 30 23 25 35 10 24 00 03 10 03 120 6 4 29 16 30 23 21 32 14 24 00 02 06 03 032 6 8 25 14 29 13 23 34 11 25 02 02 10 12 034 6 8 15 13 33 35 10 30 15 24 25 07 02 01 118 6 8 25 14 29 13 23 34 11 25 02 02 10 12 122 6 8 17 14 31 34 31 31 13 14 02 05 06 02 030 6 12 20 06 25 27 30 29 14 21 00 15 11 02 033 6 12 20 06 25 27 30 29 14 21 00 15 11 02 113 6 12 21 06 22 23 25 29 24 21 04 15 04 06 116 6 12 10 18 29 24 38 32 11 04 02 00 10 22 008 7 0 33 28 19 00 17 22 21 20 00 00 10 30 054 7 22 18 29 19 28 32 11 23 00 00 10 08 041 7 4 14 15 22 22 36 35 17 27 00 00 11 01 046 7 4 29 27 23 28 21 23 17 22 00 00 10 00 135 7 4 20 19 23 19 30 29 20 25 00 02 07 06 136 7 4 25 18 30 19 25 29 14 30 00 03 06 01 045 7 8 18 13 24 22 32 24 22 27 00 13 04 01 047 7 8 39 23 28 18 11 25 18 30 00 02 04 02 131 7 8 22 28 24 31 26 19 17 19 02 03 09 00 132 7 8 27 14 23 19 19 33 16 24 04 03 11 07 037 7 12 17 16 20 19 23 28 22 24 10 06 08 07 038 7 12 20 14 24 14 24 31 16 32 06 05 10 04 125 7 12 23 14 24 19 25 33 18 22 02 03 08 09 126 7 12 28 15 20 18 22 26 14 26 00 09 16 06 LEGEND: 1 = Dark staining intensity; 2 = Medium staining intensity; 3 = Light staining intensity; SDH = Succinate dehydrogenase; ATP = Intermyofibrillar adenosine triphosphatase; PPL = Phosphorylase; PAS 8 Periodic acid-Schiff. 121 TABLE C-3.--Histochemical ratings for soleus muscle presented by animal number, treatment, and duration. Phenotypic Rating/Histochemical Procedure Animal Treat- Dur. Number ment (Wk.) SDH ATP PPL PAS SDH ATP PPL PAS SDH ATP PPL PAS 006 1 0 09 07 00 00 41 43 12 20 00 00 38 30 009 1 0 16 12 00 00 34 38 17 19 00 00 33 31 002 1 4 13 37 00 00 37 42 14 26 00 00 36 24 053 l 4 13 09 00 00 37 41 10 07 00 00 40 43 100 l 4 12 07 00 00 38 43 07 07 00 00 43 43 140 1 4 12 11 00 00 38 39 ll 28 00 00 39 22 005 1 8 13 09 00 00 37 41 08 26 00 00 42 24 052 1 8 16 14 00 00 34 36 15 26 00 00 35 24 099 l 8 07 06 02 00 43 44 06 17 00 00 42 33 139 1 8 17 14 00 00 33 36 l6 17 00 00 37 33 003 l 12 14 00 00 03 36 40 08 28 00 00 42 19 051 l 12 14 10 00 03 36 40 08 28 00 00 42 19 098 l 12 14 09 00 00 36 41 41 10 00 00 09 40 138 1 12 10 02 00 00 40 48 04 29 00 00 46 21 007 2 0 07 08 00 00 43 42 08 10 00 00 42 40 057 2 0 21 20 00 00 29 30 22 37 00 00 28 13 069 2 4 24 16 00 01 26 34 15 44 00 00 35 05 070 2 4 09 09 00 09 41 41 17 36 00 00 33 05 147 2 4 16 12 00 00 34 38 12 26 00 00 38 24 149 2 4 22 17 00 00 28 33 16 32 00 00 34 18 064 2 8 17 03 00 00 33 47 06 04 00 00 44 46 068 2 8 15 13 00 00 35 37 14 13 00 00 36 17 148 2 8 10 03 00 00 40 47 48 28 00 00 02 22 150 2 8 10 02 00 00 40 48 05 24 00 00 45 26 062 2 12 12 13 00 00 38 37 12 36 00 00 38 14 072 2 12 15 12 00 00 35 38 09 46 00 00 41 04 145 2 12 06 02 00 00 44 48 06 22 00 00 44 28 152 2 12 ll 07 00 00 39 43 09 47 00 00 41 03 058 3 0 17 06 00 00 33 44 17 24 00 00 33 26 055 3 0 15 10 00 00 35 40 20 09 00 00 30 41 014 3 4 08 10 00 00 42 40 10 09 00 00 40 41 015 3 4 19 16 00 00 31 34 16 38 00 00 34 12 107 3 4 15 09 00 07 35 41 06 23 00 00 44 20 108 3 4 24 12 00 07 26 38 15 23 00 00 35 20 020 3 8 08 03 00 00 42 47 00 03 00 00 49 47 022 3 8 15 07 00 01 35 43 10 29 00 00 40 20 106 3 8 16 08 00 02 34 42 37 43 00 00 13 05 110 3 8 26 05 00 00 24 45 11 32 00 00 39 18 018 3 12 12 07 00 00 38 43 08 30 00 00 42 20 021 3 12 10 04 00 04 40 46 07 46 00 00 43 00 101 3 12 14 03 01 02 36 47 07 24 00 01 43 24 104 3 12 14 03 99 02 36 47 99 24 00 00 99 24 011 4 0 11 10 00 00 39 40 11 33 00 00 39 17 059 4 0 09 11 00 00 41 39 10 32 00 00 40 18 074 4 4 07 05 00 05 43 45 13 42 00 00 37 03 077 4 4 10 09 00 00 40 41 08 21 00 00 42 29 154 4 4 27 11 01 02 23 39 11 27 00 00 39 21 159 4 4 17 08 00 02 33 42 11 27 00 00 39 21 075 4 8 14 06 00 00 36 44 11 32 00 00 39 18 080 4 8 34 05 00 00 16 45 08 33 00 00 42 17 162 4 8 02 02 00 00 48 48 02 38 00 00 48 12 122 TABLE C—3.-—Continued. _""‘"‘ ‘-“ —' L—t ’3 ‘a;-L—£~‘.-fi;l—; 2.2.; .1 42':- 2..." P‘ - L... J_. :P_. _' P. .‘—.‘. 2- _"’P“’_.:‘.P- ‘P‘_'—..-.' P. PP._ :1":— __..=_.. Phenotypic Rating/Histochemical Procedure PULP :_" 1 ,.-_ —.._ Animal Treat- Dur. 1 Number ment (Wk.) 2 3 SDH ATP PPL PAS SDH ATP PPL PAS SDH ATP PPL PAS 11 164 4 8 01 08 01 00 49 42 02 28 00 00 48 22 073 4 12 34 03 00 15 16 47 30 33 00 00 20 02 076 4 12 18 03 00 05 32 47 02 43 00 00 48 02 153 4 12 22 08 00 00 28 42 00 37 00 00 49 13 010 5 0 09 07 00 00 41 43 12 20 00 00 38 30 056 5 0 14 14 00 00 36 36 14 14 00 00 36 36 088 5 4 16 14 00 00 34 36 15 20 00 00 35 30 089 5 4 13 10 00 00 37 40 10 06 00 00 40 44 170 5 4 11 O9 00 01 39 41 11 39 00 00 39 10 172 5 4 11 03 00 02 39 47 07 37 00 00 43 11 091 5 8 14 12 00 02 36 38 11 34 00 00 39 14 g 092 5 8 10 08 00 00 40 42 20 42 00 00 30 08 3 166 5 8 21 16 00 00 29 34 20 31 00 00 30 19 J 085 5 12 14 06 00 24 36 14 10 26 00 00 40 00 '" 095 5 12 43 18 00 17 07 31 23 33 00 01 27 00 U 171 5 12 19 00 00 00 31 49 10 45 00 00 40 05 176 5 12 29 12 00 00 21 38 16 49 00 00 34 01 012 6 0 13 13 00 00 37 37 17 26 00 00 33 24 060 6 0 16 13 00 00 34 37 17 39 00 00 33 11 026 6 4 11 08 06 00 39 42 09 46 00 00 35 04 027 6 4 12 05 00 00 38 45 12 28 00 00 38 22 119 6 4 27 02 00 01 23 48 06 28 00 00 44 22 120 6 4 09 09 00 01 41 41 14 28 00 00 36 22 032 6 8 30 03 02 15 30 47 15 35 00 00 33 00 034 6 8 20 14 00 00 30 36 14 17 00 00 36 33 118 6 8 03 05 00 00 47 45 05 44 00 00 45 06 122 6 8 13 04 00 05 37 46 08 43 00 00 42 02 030 6 12 14 07 01 01 36 43 12 40 00 01 38 10 033 6 12 14 07 00 00 36 43 12 40 00 00 38 10 113 6 12 20 16 00 00 30 34 06 20 00 00 44 30 116 6 12 20 12 00 00 3O 38 15 34 00 00 35 16 008 7 0 16 06 00 00 34 44 13 04 00 00 37 46 054 7 0 ll 11 00 00 39 39 14 10 00 00 36 40 041 7 4 16 15 00 00 34 15 16 41 00 00 34 09 046 7 4 11 13 05 00 39 37 11 04 00 00 34 46 135 7 4 16 08 00 01 34 42 12 27 00 00 38 22 136 7 4 12 07 00 05 38 43 08 32 00 00 42 13 045 7 8 26 00 01 05 24 49 17 44 00 00 33 01 047 7 8 13 06 00 00 37 44 17 09 00 00 33 41 131 7 8 17 11 00 06 33 39 14 44 00 00 36 00 132 7 8 13 08 00 02 37 42 09 28 00 00 41 20 037 7 12 10 03 00 00 40 47 05 49 00 00 45 00 038 7 12 13 02 00 17 37 39 06 33 00 09 44 00 125 7 12 10 04 00 00 40 45 09 30 00 00 41 20 126 7 12 16 07 00 00 34 43 12 26 00 00 38 24 LEGEND: 1 = Dark staining intensity; 2 = Medium staining intensity; 3 = Light staining intensity; SDH = Succinate dehydrogenase; ATP = Intermyofibrillar adenosine triphosphatase; PPL = Phosphorylase; PAS = Periodic acid-Schiff. APPENDIX D STATISTICAL TABLES FOR MEDIAL GASTROCNEMIUS, PLANTARIS, AND SOLEUS MUSCLES . III [I'll]! Ill" j.| 1| 11 i 123 TABLE D-1.--Two-way analysis of variance tables for histo- percent ratings in medial chemical Sin"1 gastrocnemius muscle. Source SS df MS F SDH-—Rating 1 A (Training) 278.50 6 46.42 0.663 B (Duration) 375.60 3 125.20 1.789 AB (Training- Duration) 2666.78 18 148.15 2.117 Error 4618.13 66 Total 7939.01 93 SDH—-Rating 2 A (Training) 2532.17 6 422.03 2.713 B (Duration) 188.68 3 62.89 0.404 AB (Training- Duration) 3361.93 18 186.77 1.200 Error 10267.14 66_ 155.56 Total 16349.92 3 SDH-~Rating 3 A (Training) 2667.07 6 444.51 2.288 B (Duration) 308.80 3 102.93 0.530 AB (Training— Duration) 4513.04 18 250.72 1.290 Error 12824.75 66 194.31 Total 2 3.66 93 ATP-~Rating 1 A (Training) 1081.71 6 180.28 1.736 B (Duration) 825.91 3 275.30 2.650 AB (Training— Duration) 2653.00 18 147.39 1.419 Error 6856.08 66 103.88 Total 11416.70 93 124 TABLE D-l.-—Continued. Source SS df MS F ATP——Rating 2 A (Training) 1269.91 6 211.65 0.973 B (Duration) 2035.83 3 678.61 3.119 AB (Training- Duration) 4336.55 18 240.92 1.107 Error 14361.30 66 217.60 Total 22003.59 92 ATP-~Rating 3 A (Training) 3012.10 6 502.02 1.760 B (Duration) 3056.55 3 1018.85 3.572 AB (Training- Duration) 5935.16 18 329.73 1.156 Error 18827.70 66’ 285.27 Total 25831.51 93 PPL--Rating 1 A (Training) 2129.71 6 354.95 3.039 B (Duration) 1216.22 3 405.41 3.471 AB (Training- Duration) 3849.16 18 213.84 1.831 Error 7707.98 66‘ 116.79 Total 14903.07 93 PPL—-Rating 2 A (Training) 2303.00 6 383.83 2.797 B (Duration) 1647.30 3 549.10 4.001 AB (Training— Duration) 5550.69 18 308.37 2.247 Error 9057.11 66 137.23 Total 18558.10 93 125 TABLE D-l.-—Continued. Source SS df MS F PPL-~Rating 3 A (Training) 2073.86 6 345.64 4.401 B (Duration) 204.52 3 68.17 0.868 AB (Training- Duration) 2242.67 18 124.59 1.587 Error 5183.02 66 78.53 Total 9704.07 9 PAS-~Rating 1 A (Training) 1248.36 6 208.06 0.983 B (Duration) 1355.36 3 451.79 2.134 AB (Training— Duration) 7207.63 18 400.42 1.891 Error 13973.05 66 211.71 Total 23784.40 93 PAS-~Rating 2 A (Training) 1061.75 6 176.96 0.968 B (Duration) 1082.29 3 360.76 1.974 AB (Training- Duration) 5686.19 18 315.90 1.728 Error 12064.01 66 182.79 Total 19894.24 93 PAS-—Rating 3 A (Training) 892.24 6 148.71 1.714 B (Duration) 150.87 3 50.30 0.580 AB (Training- Duration) 2846.52 18 158.14 1.823 Error 5726.43 66’ 86.76 Total 9616.06 93 LEGEND: l = Dark staining intensity; 2 = Medium staining intensity; 3 = Light staining intensity; SDH = Succinate dehydrogenase; ATP = Intermyofibrillar adenosine triphosphatase; PPL = Phosphorylase; PAS = Periodic acid-Schiff; N = Not significant; S = Significant at .05 level. 126 TABLE D—2.--Two-way analysis of variance tables for histo— chemical Sin"l percent ratings in plantaris muscle. SDH--Rating 1 A (Training) 494.77 6 82.46 1.258 N B (Duration) 487.40 3 162.47 2.478 N AB (Training- Duration) 651.54 18 36.20 0.552 N Error 4327.76 66 65.57 Total 5961.47 93 SDH—-Rating 2 A (Training) 462.27 6 77.04 1.120 N B (Duration) 568.34 3 189.45 2.755 N AB (Training- Duration) 919.42 18 51.08 0.743 N Error 4538.62 66 68.77 Total 6488.65 93 SDH—-Rating 3 A (Training) 797.91 6 132.99 1.291 N B (Duration) 458.49 3 152.83 1.484 N AB (Training- Duration) 1789.46 18 99.41 0.965 N Error 6799.02 66 103.02 Total 9844.88 93 ATP——Rating l A (Training) 467.27 6 77.88 2.189 N B (Duration) 236.19 3 78.73 2.213 N AB (Training— Duration) 931.73 18 51.76 1.455 N Error 2348.05 66 35.58 Total 3983.24 93 127 TABLE D-2.--Continued. Source SS df MS F ATP--Rating 2 A (Training) 719.53 6 119.92 3.278 B (Duration) 103.66 3 34.55 0.945 AB (Training- Duration) 1276.12 18 70.90 1.938 Error 2414.42 66 36.58 Total 4513.73 93 ATP--Rating 3 A (Training) 1107.25 6 184.54 2.257 B (Duration) 761.83 3 253.94 3.106 AB (Training- Duration) 2113.78 18 117.43 1.436 Error 5395.76 66 81.75 Total 9378.62 93 PPL-~Rating 1 A (Training) 220.49 6 36.75 0.816 B (Duration) 123.90 3 41.30 0.917 AB (Training- Duration) 713.80 18 39.66 0.881 Error 2971.24 66 45.02 Total 4029.43 3 PPL-~Rating 2 A (Training) 205.60 6 34.27 0.789 B (Duration) 58.59 3 29.53 0.450 AB (Training- Duration) 437.32 18 24.30 0.559 Error 2867.33 66 43.44 Total 3568.84 93 influx. in Jug. dfiufilJi 128 TABLE D—2.——Continued. Source SS df MS F P PPL--Rating 3 A (Training) 597.69 6 99.62 2.965 S B (Duration) 210.61 3 70.20 2.090 N AB (Training- Duration) 628.23 18 34.90 1.039 N Error 2217.44 66 33.60 Total 3653.97 93 PAS—~Rating 1 A (Training) 565.25 6 94.21 0.747 N B (Duration) 1665.81 3 555.27 4.403 S AB (Training- Duration) 1728.90 18 96.05 0.762 N Error 8323.35 66 126.11 Total 12283.31 9 PAS-~Rating 2 A (Training) 521.79 6 86.97 0.858 N B (Duration) 350.76 3 116.92 1.154 N AB (Training- Duration) 2333.08 18 129.62 1.279 N Error 6686.36 66 101.31 Total 9891.99 3 PAS--Rating 3 A (Training) 157.11 6 26.19 0.208 N B (Duration) 737.77 3 245.92 1.950 N AB (Training- Duration) 3350.16 18 186.12 1.476 N Error 8322.63 ‘66 126.10 Total 12567.67 93 LEGEND: 1 = Dark staining intensity; 2 = Medium staining intensity; 3 = Light staining intensity; SDH = Succinate dehydrogenase; ATP adenosine triphosphatase; PPL PAS = Periodic acid-Schiff; N S = Significant at .05 level. Intermyofibrillar = Phosphorylase; Not significant; 129 TABLE D—3.--Two-way analysis of variance tables for histo- chemical Sin-l percent ratings in soleus muscle. Source SS df MS F P SDH—-Rating l A (Training) 153.92 6 25.65 0.340 N B (Duration) 128.76 3 42.92 0.568 N AB (Training- Duration) 1244.60 18 69.14 0.916 N Error 4983.19 66 75.50 Total 6510.47 3 SDH--Rating 2 A (Training) 153.92 6 25.65 0.340 N B (Duration) 128.76 3 42.92 0.568 N AB (Training- Duration) 1244.60 18 69.14 0.916 N Error 4983.19 66 75.50 Total 6510.47 3 SDH-~Rating 3 A (Training) 4.74 6 0.79 1.183 N B (Duration) 2.63 3 0.88 1.311 N AB (Training- Duration) 14.80 18 0.82 1.231 N Error 44.07 66 0.67 Total 66.24 93 ATP--Rating 1 A (Training) 268.70 6 44.78 0.647 N B (Duration) 910.17 3 303.39 4.385 S AB (Training- Duration) 1237.38 18 68.74 0.994 N Error 4566.37 66 69.19 Total 6982.62 93 TABLE D-3.--Continued. Source SS df MS F ATP--Rating 2 A (Training) 196.25 6 32.71 0.743 B (Duration) 441.42 3 147.14 3.343 AB (Training- Duration) 910.28 18 50.57 1.149 Error 2905.11 66 44.02 Total 4453.06 93 ATP--Rating 3 A (Training) 24.02 6 4.00 0.429 B (Duration) 60.91 3 20.30 2.176 AB (Training- Duration) 82.91 18 4.61 0.494 Error 615.88 66. 9.33 Total 783.72 3 PPL——Rating A (Training) 61.04 6 10.17 0.668 B (Duration) 32.79 3 10.93 0.718 AB (Training- Duration) 107.57 18 5.98 0.393 Error 1004.99 66 15.23 Total 1206.59 93 PPL--Rating A (Training). 1102.99 6 183.83 1.652 B (Duration) 685.77 3 228.59 2.054 AB (Training- Duration) 1289.19 18 71.62 0.644 Error 7345.38 66_ 111.29 Total 10423.33 93 131 TABLE D—3.--Continued. Source SS df MS F P PPL--Rating 3 A (Training) 929.89 6 154.98 1.488 N B (Duration) 605.99 3 201.99 1.939 N AB (Training- Duration) 1106.64 18 61.48 0.590 N Error 6876.72 66 104.19 Total 9519.24 93 PAS-~Rating 1 A (Training) 370.06 6 61.68 0.699 N B (Duration) 614.27 3 204.76 2.318 N AB (Training- Duration) 1567.42 18 87.08 0.986 N Error 5827.86 66 88.30 Total 5379161 93' PAS--Rating 2 A (Training) 2610.10 6 435.02 2.058 N B (Duration) 2883.87 3 961.29 4.548 S AB (Training- Duration) 3222.52 18 179.03 0.847 N Error 13949.12 66 211.35 Total 22665.61 93 PAS--Rating 3 A (Training) 3182.20 6 530.37 1.894 N B (Duration) 5443.59 3 1814.53 6.480 S AB (Training- Duration) 6189.84 18 343.88 1.228 N Error 18482.22 66 280.03 Total 33297.85 9 LEGEND: l = Dark staining intensity; 2 = Medium staining intensity; 3 = Light staining intensity; SDH Succinate dehydrogenase; ATP = Intermyofibrillar adenosine triphosphatase; PPL = Phosphorylase; = Not significant; PAS = Periodic acid-Schiff; N S = Significant at .05 level. APPENDIX E HISTOCHEMICAL FIBER TYPE MEAN DATA 132 2950»; .o 3.650 uco 29:60; 3 8.528320 34.82 .3 396m .8... 8.2.622: 28 .8 8.: nnéum 0.3m: l oymw 362% .556! .2..on 55...? 8528—4 8w #:sz mam.” fimxm .6528 Sum» n_Nu. n N. n._No. n N. n N. n N. DWM‘ :1. 02:5 1L 1. 0 L0» N. N. N. t... _N_. 34% i l 00. 4......wdéafiswfii. m.-...q..m..c.uiwr 4.........a.._nw_.m.........wCiawm A... 3...... 14.01;-.-2.11.4230 .......‘._._1?.E.1 g 44.42924“.”.42.... .wa Ia-+@-4@-4fl-ia.1s_44-W.rz. 1€.Ca4 :2. cm mad I”... J444444fleeéfi“gagjiu 133 .8662... 10 8.650 Bo .856...» B 95:23.. .2 826m .8... 62528.9: 28 an. :82 .i.m..m 92.6.; 11.11.11.111... “1111 111.11.11.11 1.1111 11.1. _ 111......1....111..1..11.1. 11.11.11.11fi111fi1. 1.: 11.1.11. 11.11.111.11. 1111.1... 1.11.11.11.11. 1.1. 111.11.... maladéaqmaéucmazzii 1.11%. qua- a: 11.1.1.1... .1. 11.111111111111111; 11.11.11.111 1111.11.11... 1H,...“ 1.....111.1.1.11..11.....1111..1.11.1.11.11.11.111 .1.....1..1.111.....1.1w 1. 1.1.11. 1.111.111.1111... .1..........1.....111.11111.1. 1.111.111.111111111 134 111.11.... 1:953.» 10 8.650 9.5 22:68» E mDmJOm .8 .1056". .09.. 62.55921 .80 an. cows. It.mlm mufimfim 1.11.1211. 1.11.11.11.11... 11m... 1111.11.11.11 1.111.111... .11 __ 1.1... 11.11... 1.111%. 111.111.11.14 1.11.11.11.11“ “11.151... 1.1mm“ 1.1.1 11.1 1 11:11.1 1.1 111 .1111 1. .11 1 1.. 1.11:1 11.... 1. .1. 11. 111.11. 11111.1”; 11111111111111.1111... 111.... 1.11 1.11.. 1. 11.1111. 21111131111111w wam - Qua 98...”... 8.111.112.3811”: 1.2.82.2. fiver...“ UH... 11.111.111.11H 1.1.1.1111... 11.11.11.111..__ 11.111.11.111... 11.8.1.1...111111__1 .11.... £1 flfi Z. 1 .1. i. 2.1Wn_~..mf41m_4mi.fiw% mflwgfmge u L E 1. .1 fl C m 8. Q. E. .jfli h. %.o a.m.-4 I. .0 .1 .1 .. u rduwhy no. Us... 111.1%..1md miimd m. m H... 1.111111611111111... :2 1: 1.11.... 1.1.1:. 11. .1...1111H1111111111111M111. 1.111111. 1.11. 1. .111 11.43%... 10.11.1115 122801.911“... 22.88 ”1“,...“