£3239 ”HMH””NIH!UHHUI“!INIHMHHHHWHWWW/l ruesfii This is to certify that the thesis entitled A STUDY OF THE ULTRASTRUCTURE OF THE DEVELOPING CUNEATE NUCLEUS OF POUCH YOUNG OPOSSUMS AFTER EARLY DEAFFERENTATION presented by E.—Michael Ostapoff has been accepted towards fulfillment of the requirements for ' ’7- M" 5: degree in /'J/[//flé CG; Major professor Date /37/////’,/ ///i/ 0-7639 OVERDUE FINES: 25¢ per day per item RETURNING LIBRARY MATERIALS: “5” 1 Place in book return to remove "‘"” ‘ '- : charge from circulation records é -“\\\‘ ‘4 m“); ' A STUDY OF THE ULTRASTRUCTURE OF THE DEVELOPING CUNEATE NUCLEUS OF POUCH YOUNG OPOSSUMS AFTER EARLY DEAFFERENTATION By Ernst-Michael Ostapoff A THESIS Submitted to Michigan State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE Department of Psychology 1980 ABSTRACT A STUDY OF THE ULTRASTRUCTURE OF THE DEVELOPING CUNEATE NUCLEUS OF POUCH YOUNG OPOSSUMS AFTER EARLY DEAFFERENTATION BY E.-MICHAEL OSTAPOFF Removal of the forepaw on the ninth day post-partum results in a forty percent reduction in the volume of the cuneate nucleus neuropil of opossums not seen following removal at twenty days post-partum. Electron microscopic morphometric analysis comparing the deafferented with the contralateral dorsal cuneate neuropils at 3, 6, 9, and 11 days survival was conducted to determine the ultrastructural correlates of this volume loss. No changes were found in the area of 13 profile categories nor in the synaptic density or frequencies of synapse type observed. Evidence supporting possible axonal sprouting on the deafferented side was found on the basis of vesicle size and shape within pre-synaptic terminals. It was concluded that the volume loss seen at the light microscopic level due to the type of input modification used in this study results in a neuropil development which is indistinguishable from the contralateral side of the same animals during the time course included in this study and within the parameters selected. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I give many thanks to Dr. John I. Johnson who suffered through the earlier drafts of this thesis and who encouraged me to finally complete it. I also thank the members of my committee, Drs. Charles D. Tweedle and Glenn I. Hatton. I also wish to acknowledge the assistance of Jerry Benjamin in preparing the photographic materials contained within. Thanks also go to Stephen J. Warach for the use of some of his preliminary results and his help in caring for the opossums used in this study. Finally, I must thank my wife, Robin, whose understanding, not to mention her generous financial support during the preparation of this thesis made it possible. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . LIST OF FIGURES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . INTRODUCTION. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . MATERIALS AND METHODS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Subjects . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ANALYSIS I. PROFILE AREA MEASUREMENTS AND SYNAPTOLOGY. METHODS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Measurements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Synaptic Density and Classification. . . . . . . Statistical Considerations . . . . . . . . RESULTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Profile Classification Data. Synapse Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . DISCUSSION. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Interpretaion Of Profile Categories. . . . . . Area Measurements. . . . . . . . . Synapse Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ANALYSIS II. SYNAPTIC VESICLE MORPHOLOGY. . . . . . . . METHODS . . ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . RESULTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . DISCUSSION. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . GENERAL DISCUSSION. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . iii Page vi 10 10 11 ll 13 13 14 l6 16 27 27 27 32 35 37 37 38 44 49 Page LIST OF REFERENCES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 53 iv Table LIST OF TABLES Page Mean Profile Category Area . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 T-Tests Of Differences Between Contra (C) And Deaff (D) Sides. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . l8 Synaptic Relationships . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29 Frequencies Of Terminals Whose Mean W/L Ratio Is Within One Block Of The Modal Block. . . . . . . . . . . . 45 Figure LIST OF FIGURES Page Examples of most of the profile categories included in this study are shown in the following four figures taken from the sample micrographs, in a cropped and reduced format. Figures 1 and 2 are taken from the 6 day survival Contra side, Figures 3 and 4 from the 6 day Deaff side. Beneath each micrograph is a line tracing of some of the profiles in each micrograph. For clarity, the majority of profiles in each figure have been omitted in these tracings. During actual data collection, all the profiles in each micrograph were traced, categorized, and the areas measured. A general inspection of the figures will reveal little or no qualitative differences in the neuropil components. This was reflected in the quantitative measures, (see Results, Analysis I). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 Taken from Contra side, 6 day survival. Shown here are the two categories of pre—synaptic profiles identified on the Contra sides participating in synapses with differ- ent types of membrane specializations. The synapse in the upper center (closed arrow) is between a rather large At profile and a large Mtr profile. The membrane specializa- tion was judged to be symmetrical. The vesicle data means :;SEM for the At profile in this case were WXL= 6.27 i .33 and W/L= .7355 i .0608, indicating a distribution of rather small flat vesicles within this terminal. The synapse in the lower right (open arrow) is between a Ved and'Mtr profile with an asymmetrical membrane specialization. This terminal had a distribution of flatter but somewhat larger vesicles (W/L= .6894;: .0176 and WxL= 6.66 i .49) than the previous At terminal. The two Mf profiles in the center of the micrograph are probably glial in nature and show qualitatively different packing densities in their filaments. Bar equals 1 mm. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 vi Figure Page Taken from the 6 day survival Contra side. On the left side (closed arrow) is an asymmetrical synapse between a large At profile and smallthr profile. The vesicle measurements showed this terminal to contain vesicles slightly rounder, though still within the range of flat vesicles, and larger than those terminals in Figure l, (WXL= 7.07 i .31 and W/L= .7402 i .0270). Atypical examples of Vel and.Vad profiles are also shown in the upper left and center of the micrograph. The Vel profile satisfies the criteria for the Mt category except for the few vesicles and floccular background in the lower por- tion of the profile. The Vad profile also satisfies the criteria for the Mt category except for the polymorphous vesicles in the lower tip. In both cases it was judged that these were representative of transitional zones in the processes where the ultrastructural characteristics of the processes were changing. A smaller Vad profile is shown in the lower center. Though smaller than most, this profile demonstrates more typical Vad ultrastructure. To the lower right is the profile in the Contra treatment mentioned in the text as most closely conforming to previously published reports of "late stage" electron dense degeneration. Bar equals 1 mm. . . . . . . . . . . . 22 Taken from the 6 day survival, Deaff side. This figure illustrates a possible transition profile between the Vad and Vel categories (see Discussion, Analysis I). In the center of the micrograph is a large profile with characteristic large polymorphous vesicles. On this basis it was placed in the Vad category. Areas in this profile appear identical in ultrastructure to those of the pro- file in the lower right, categorized as a Vel profile. . . . 24 Taken from the Deaff side, 6 day survival. In the lower right is a symmetrical synapse between a Ved profile and an Elf profile. This Ved terminal contained rather large, round vesicles (wa= 8.02 i_.77 and W/L= .8091 i .0608). In the upper left is a profile categorized as Mf because, in spite of the absence of organelles, it was felt that this profile conformed to the characteristics of astro- cytic profiles previously published (see Methods, Analysis I). Immediately adjacent to this profile is an area of extracellular space, Xcs. One can note that this region is bordered by only a single membrane layer belonging to the surrounding profiles. The apparent contents of this space was judged to be artefact. Bar equals 1 mm. . . . . . 26 \ vii Figure Page Synaptic density expressed in number of synapses per 500 squared microns of tissue sampled on the ordinate. Individual survival times are along the abscissa and to the right are the treatment group means. Solid circles are from the Contra group; open squares from the Deaff group. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28 (A) Scatter plot of mean vesicle size versus shape (Contra side). Shown is the distribution of axonal terminal mean vesicle measurements for size (WXL) on the ordinate versus shape (W/L) on the abscissa from the Contra side samples. Each point represents the mean value from 11 vesicles measured within each pre—synaptic terminal computed as above. (B) Scatter plot of mean vesicle size versus shape (Deaff side). Same as 6 A but data is from the Deaff side samples. . . . . . . . . . . 40 (A) Frequency of mean vesicle data for shape (W/L) of vesicles. Shown is the number of terminals along the ordinate, whose mean vesicle data fall within each of 9 blocks along the abscissa, representing a range of the values of W/L (shape estimate). Each block represents a range of .025, with block 1 containing those terminals whose mean vesicle data are less than .650, block 2 ter- minals between .650 and .675, etc. Block 9 represents those terminals whose mean vesicle data are greater than .850. Solid bars are from the Contra side data, open bars Deaff side data, all are treatment totalsa (B) Fre— quency of mean vesicle data for size (wa) of vesicles. Shown is the number of terminals, along the ordinate, whose mean vesicle data for size (wa) fall between each of 9 blocks along the abscissa, representing a range of wa (size estimate). Each block represents 0.50 mm2 of enlarged micrograph, with block 1 representing terminals whose mean vesicle data are less than 5.5 mmz, block 2 terminals between 5.5 and 6.0 mmz, etc.. Block 9 repre- sents terminals whose mean vesicle data are greater than 8.5 mm . Solid bars are total treatment frequencies of terminals in the Contra side samples; Open bars those from the Deaff samples. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .1. . . 42 viii INTRODUCTION This study addressed the question of how the removal of the peri- pheral afferent organs affects the development of a target structure in the central nervous system (CNS). Removal of the forepaw in pouch young opossums before the fifteenth day post-partum (D15) results in an approximately 40% reduction in the volume of the cuneate nucleus at the light microscop (LM) level (Schreck and Johnson, 1978). This study sought to investigate the ultrastructural correlates of this induced volume loSs. A recent study (Brenowitz, in press) has shown that at D9, the skin receptors in the opossum forepaw are relatively immature and sparse in number and although neurites were seen in hypodermal and dermal skin layers, none were found in the dermal-epidermal interface region nor were any observed to be in contact with any sensory receptors. Such contacts were seen in D20 samples, by which age removal of the periphery no longer affects the cuneate nucleus at the LM level (Schreck and John— son, 1978). Removal of the forepaw at D9 must also disrupt the most distal portions of the dorsal root ganglia (DRG) peripheral processes but whether this damage results in loss of the DRG cells, especially since it occurs prior to the establishment of synaptic contacts on the receptors remains to be determined. However, removal of the receptor sites and the distal segments of the DRG peripheral processes might reasonably be expected to greatly alter the synaptic activity and perhaps the growth of the DRG afferent fibers. This, in turn should result in l 2 an altered development of the target structures, i.e. the cuneate nucle- us neurons. This predicted altered development has been seen in the cuneate nucleus at the LM level manifested by a 40% loss of nuclear vol- ume. Neuronal cell counts of the cuneate nucleus, comparing deafferen- ted with contralateral cuneate nuclei, have been inconclusive because the cuneate nucleus has a poorly defined ventral boundary and chromato- lytic (degenerating) neurons were not observed in large numbers at the LM level (Schreck and Johnson, 1978). Thus it appears that although nuclear volume decreased dramatically with early deafferentation, this decrease may not be due to cell loss, but rather alteration in neuropil development. It is this aspect in particular that the present study was intended to investigate. If the cuneate volume loss following deaffer- entation is not due to cell loss but to an alteration of neuropil devel— opment, what are the ultrastructural correlates of this alteration? After early deafferentation in this system, it has been shown physiolo- gically that the remaining area of dorsal cuneate on the deafferented side responded to the peripheral receptor fields left intact, i.e. wrist and arm. That is, no silent, unresponsive regions of the cuneate nucle- us on that side were seen following histological reconstruction of the; electrode penetrations (Hamilton and Johnson, 1973). As the present study was undertaken, it was expected that data would result which might reflect the effects of one of several possible hypotheses which could account for the volume loss seen in early deaf- ferentation of the cuneate nucleus of the opossum but which was not pre- sent after late deafferentation (D15+). The loss in area might result from: 1) degeneration of DRG afferents; or 2) cell death via transneuéfl ronal degeneration; or 3) cells which normally migrate to cuneate may 3 alter their eventual target site; or 4) atrophy and/or degeneration or withdrawal of elements (dendrites) of the cuneate neurons post-synaptic to DRG fibers; or 5) reduced or discontinued rate of proliferation, differentiation, and/or growth of cuneate neurons; or to combinations of the above. 1. Degeneration of afferents from the dorsal columns. The cuneate neuropil volume loss resulting from deafferentation prior to D10, not seen following D15 deafferentation could reflect a critical period in the reaction of the DRG cells to destruction of their peripheral processes. Were the reduced volume seen in the cuneate the result of only DRG afferent loss, then DRG fibers and terminals must occupy 40% of the neuropil in the normal cuneate. Preliminary results indicated that processes which could be interpreted as axonal (of which DRG fibers and terminals constitute at best, the majority) occupy only 20% or less of the neuropil at this stage of development. If deafferen- tation results in only removal of DRG afferent profiles, this should only result in a loss of at most an area equal to that proportion. In any case, the design of this experiment was expected to be able to detect any decrease in axonal processes. Were the loss of peripheral fibers a major factor, one would expect to detect a substantial reduction in the measured area of the axonal profiles, possibly followed, in time, by an increase reflecting the development of inputs from other CNS areas. Reactive changes, e.g. degeneration, would also be detectable in the present study, but only if the appropriate survival times are included. There are some indications in the literature that degeneration due to deafferentation in developing systems occurs at a much faster rate than in adults (e.g. Delong and Sidman, 1962). 4 2. Degeneration of cuneate cell bodies There was a notable lack of chromatolytic cell bodies seen in the LM study on deafferented cuneate development (Schreck and Johnson, 1978). In fact, although there is circumstantial evidence that there is some cell loss (e.g. there are greater numbers of cells at 16 days post- partum than at adult age D120+, Ulinski, 1969), the uncertain nature of the ventral boundary of the cuneate nucleus makes cell counts difficult (c.f. Schreck and Johnson, 1978), and none of the LM studies on dorsal column nuclei (DCN) to date have reported observing the kind of normal cell death commonly seen, for example, in the ventral horn of the spinal cord (e.g. Chu—Wang and Oppenheim, 1978) or the DRG (Hughes, 1973). It may be that this nucleus does not undergo a large reduction in cell numbers during development. If so, this might be significant in its re- action to deafferentation. That is, if the normal maintenance of the developing cuneate neuron does not depend on afferent innervation then deafferentation may not result in the loss of cell bodies. Thus, not only does there appear to be no transneuronal cell loss due to deaffer— entation but also little if any normal cell loss, as normally seen in many developing systems. Though not considered likely, if degeneration of cuneate cell bodies contributes to the volume loss, its effect might be detected by the present study. Cuneate neuron degeneration could only be detected at the appropriate survival times, as cell counts are unreliable in this system. However, through comparisons of the nuclear and cytoplasmic areas of the deafferented and contralateralucuneate sam- ples, it may be possible to infer hyper- or hypoplasia of cuneate cell bodies on the experimental side and the time course of such changes resulting from alteration of the primary afferent input. 5 3. Departure of cuneate cells (or failure to arrive): Abnormal Migration. . Abnormal primary migration due to early removal of primary affer— ents has been reported in the chick nucleus tangentialis (Levi-Mental- cini, 1949, but recently not confirmed by Peusner and Mbrest, 1977), and chick nucleus angularis (Parks, 1979), systems where cytoarchitectural boundaries of the nuclei in question and neighboring nuclei are distinct, making cell counts relatively reliable. Migration of cells in the early development of the cuneate nucleus has been problematical. Autoradio- graphic studies have indicated that the endothelial cells destined to migrate to cuneate and gracile nuclei undergo mitosis over a period of several days during the first week post-partum, (Johnson and Watson, unpublished observations). Thus, migration may also take place gradu- ally during the first week. 'Golgi preparations of normal cuneate (Warach and Johnson, 1977) show the presence of appreciable numbers of endothelial cells until the latter part of the first week (D5) and the presence of migrating cells during the entire period of D3- 13. There is a peak number of migrating cells in the period from D5 to D8, just prior to the age of deafferentation in this study, so possible influ- ences of deafferentation on migration must be considered. At the elec- tron microscope (EM) level I have not been able to identify the ultra- structural characteristics of the migrating cells in this system. I have not found profiles with the characteristics of migrating cells in the fetal monkey forebrain as reported by Rakic (1972). Given the absence of some such identification criteria for migrating cells at the EM level and the necessarily uncertain cell counts for the cuneate nucle- us,%it is difficult to design an experiment to directly address the question of abnormal migration. If abnormal migration is taking place 6 then it might result in seeing fewer nuclear and cell body profiles in the samples from the deafferented cuneate nuclei when compared with the contralateral nuclei. If deafferentation causes abnormal migration and those cells which have already migrated into cuneate before deafferenta- tion are able to develop reasonably normally, then despite the reduced volume of the cuneate neuropil at the LM level after early deafferenta- tion, it may be that the neuropil of cuneate on the deafferented side will appear normal with respect to profile area measurements. That is, if the volume loss seen at the LM level is a result of fewer cells locating themselves in the dorsal cuneate but.those which do develop in cuneate do so normally then one would expect no differences in the areas of profiles in any representative cross section of the neuropil. 4. Dendritic.Atrophy Atrophy and withdrawal of post-synaptic elements without loss of post-synaptic neurons after partial deafferentation has been seen in many systems, e.g. olfactory bulb (Mathews and Powell, 1962, Pinching and Powell, 1971), lateral geniculate nucleus (Mathews et al., 1960). chick brainstem auditory nucleus laminaris (Benes et al., 1977). In the latter study, using relatively mature chicks (5-7 days post-hatch; approx— imately 12-15 days after synaptogenesis) axotomy of the direct inputs to nucleus laminaris neurons resulted in rapid (96 hours) and large (85%) area loss to the affected dendritic tree due to atrophy without loss of the nucleus laminaris neurons or the dendritic tree innervated by unaf- fected afferents over the time course of this study. Assuming that dendrites make up a major pr0portion of the dorsal cuneate neuropil, (preliminary measurements indicated approximately 20%), atrophy of such magnitude is clearly not evident when deafferentation takes place after 7 the critical period, post D15. This discrepancy may be due largely to the fact that in transsection the afferents, virtually all the synaptic endings contacting nucleus laminaris dendrites degenerated, while in the opossum there exist other synaptic connections than those of the DRG fibers which would survive DRG deafferentation, e.g. cortical, rubral, and spinal (Martin and Dom, 1970, Martin et al., 1974). The presence of other unaltered synaptic connections does not account for the large nuclear volume loss if deafferentation occurs prior to D15. One possi- ble explanation is that these other inputs to cuneate may develop in the period between D9 and D15. If this is the case, then an analysis of synaptic vesicle morphology might be expected to result in altered numbers and/or proportions of terminals types, if these differ from the DRG terminals, on the experimentally manipulated side when compared to those on the contralateral cuneate side, as these newer terminals establish contacts. Another possible hypothesis for the discrepancy is that in this study, deafferentation occurs during the period of initial synaptogenesis and before full neuropil development, while in the previously mentioned studies, the subjects underwent experimental mani- pulation at more mature stages of development. It was anticipated that atrophy and/or withdrawal of cuneate neuron processes would be manifes- ted by either profiles exhibiting ultrastructural characteristics of atrophy or degeneration, or in reduced measured area of dendrite-like processes in the samples on the deafferented sides when compared to the control sides. 5. Altered proliferation, differentiation and growth The differential effects of deafferentation during the critical period versus after the critical period may be an interruption of and 8 suspension of the normal developmental ontogeny of the cuneate neuropil. Golgi preparations have been utilized as one method of examining the response of developing neurons to deafferentation, however the difficul- ty of obtaining litters.of pouch young opossums of known ages combined with the erratic nature of Golgi impregnation argued against using those methods. In addition, any reactive alterations in the cytoplasmic organelles or membrane specializations of cuneate cells, and alterations in the incoming DRG fibers and terminals which possibly might occur due to deafferentation could not be visualized using standard Golgi impreg- nated material. Gold-toning impregnated and identified cuneate neurons for EM analysis might be a viable, informative methodology, but repeated attempts in this laboratory over the past three years have not yielded a single impregnated cell in glutaraldehyde fixed pouch young opossum material (in contrast to 5—10 day old chick and adult raccoon material). The identification of all the individual profiles of a cross section of the neuropil was expected to result in a composite picture of the rela- tive complexity of that neuropil and provide a basis for comparisons of the relative complexity between deafferented and normal cuneate neuro- pils much as one would compare branching patterns and dendritic lengths in Golgi preparations but without the vagaries of the latter method. During the normal development, the area of dendrite-like profiles increa- ses with age (Tweedle et al., 1977), i.e. as the dendrites of the cuneate neurons grow and proliferate, they occupy a larger proportion of the cuneate cross sectional area. If the normal differentiation of the cuneate neurons is interrupted as a result of early deafferentation, then it was expected that there would be an alteration in this increase in area. In addition, there was expected to be a qualitative difference 9 between the appearance of the neuropil on the deafferented and the control sides. During the normal development of neurons, the few, large, relatively sparsely branched processes of the immature neuron give way to smaller, more profusely branched processes of the adult neuron. If deafferentation results in arrested differentiation of the cuneate neu— ron, then a representative cross section from the neuropil of the deafferented cuneate should contain relatively few small processes and relatively more large ones. Thus, this study was expected to be able to indicate the time course and relative complexity of development of the cuneate neurOpil on both the deafferented and contralateral sides of the brainstem. An alteration in trophic factors might account for this possible arrested development. It might be that although removal of the forepaw does result in altered, presumably reduced, synaptic acitvity of the DRG terminals, damage to the DRG peripheral processes may be insufficient to cause either cessation of some undetermined neuronal maintenance factor not directly linked with synaptic transmission or atrophy related to terminal and fiber degeneration and concomitant glial engulfment of degenerating processes. If this is the case, then analysis of synaptic terminal vesicle morphology should indicate the continued presence of DRG fiber terminals, again only if they constitute a recognizable sub- category. If the DRG fiber terminals remain and the normal neuropil morphology does not develop, then it would seem evident that it is the influence of active peripheral afferents, either their active presence at a developmentally crucial period or their release of some trophic factor dependant on the DRG fiber activity which is the active agent in cuneate neuron development. The role of the remaining unaffected 10 synaptic inputs (cortical, etc.) may then be considered as maintaining a level of development rather than stimulating new or furthering devel- opment. The present study will be reported in two parts. Analysis I will include the data from the measurement of profile category areas and the density, type, and distribution of synapses. Analysis II will include the vesicle morphology data from the pre-synaptic axonal terminals identified in Analysis 1. MATERIALS AND METHODS Subjects Pouch young opossums, Didelphis virginiana, of known ages were sub- jects of this experiment. The ages of subjects were determined by daily checking the pouches of female opossums bred in captivity. D1 was taken as the first day in which pouch young were observed. 0n D9 all litter- mates had one of their forepaws amputated without removing them from the mother's nipples while the mother was lightly anesthetized with sodium pentobarbital (20 mg/kg). Survival times of 3, 6, 9, and 11 days were sampled. On the appropriate day of sacrifice, one subject was removed from the mother's pouch, weighed, measured, and anesthetized with an in- traperitoneal injection of 0.005 mg sodium pentobarbital and 0.095 ml .9% saline. They were then sacrificed by intracardial pressure perfusion with 2% paraformaldehyde, 2% purified glutaraldehyde in .1M sodium caco- dylate containing 0.5% DMSO and 0.001% CaCl2 (pH 7.5 and 600 mOS). The skull was then removed over the midbrain and obex and the whole animal immersed in the fixative overnight at 40 C. The medulla was then blocked 11 at the obex into a 1 mm post-obex slice which was divided into right and left halves, rinsed in .1M cacodylate and postfixed overnight at 40 C or 8—10 hours at room temperature in 2% 0s04- 2% potassium ferrocyanide (Dvorak et al., 1972). The blocks were then rinsed in .lN sodium ace— tate and stained in block with 1% uranyl acetate for at least 2 hours at room temperature or 8 hours at 40 C and then dehydrated through a graded series of alcohols and embedded in plastic for electron microscopy. Semi-thick (1-2 m) were cut from both halves of the brainstem and stained with 2% methylene blue to localize the cuneate nucleus. Ultra- thin (60 nm) sections were then cut and mounted on uncoated 200 mesh copper grids. Using the semi-thick sections for reference, the dorsal aspect of the cuneate nucleus was located on the grids under the electron microscope (Philips 201) and a series of 16 nearly contiguous but non-overlapping negatives were taken at a primary magnification of 15,000. These were then enlarged 2.8 times and printed, yielding a final magnification of 42,000. ANALYSIS I: PROFILE CATEGORY AREA MEASUREMENTS AND SYNAPTOLOGY METHODS These enlarged micrographs were then analyzed in the following manner. Individual profiles were assigned to categories which were established by noting the organelle contents and ultrastructural charac- teristics of the various profiles in the samples. If further analysis showed a reasonable frequency of occurrence of any particular profile type, that category was retained. The categories included: Nuc- Cyt- Mtr- Elf- Mt- At- Vel- Vad- 12 profile containing chromatin, defined as a "fairly homogenous population of fine strands" (Peters et al., 1976 pp. 47-50). May contain one or more nucleoli (dense, large, roughly spherical mass clearly demarcated from the rest of the karyo- plasm). The profiles included in this category are generally regarded as representing the nuclei of neurons (Peters et al., 1976 pp. 47). profile adjacent to Nuc; irregular in shape; containing poly- ribosomes, mitochondria, some microtubules, lysosomes, Golgi bodies, rough and/or smooth endoplasmic reticulum (ER). This category is generally understood to represent the cell bodies of neurons (Peters et al., 1976 pp. 11). profile with a regular shape containg microtubules and ribo- somes; can contain smooth ER. This category is generally understood to represent the dendritic processes of neurons (Peters e. al., 1976 pp. 10). profile with an electron lucent background and a floccular contents; can contain a few pleomorphic vesicles and have microtubules at one end; profile is usually large with a regular shape and occasionally will have a club-shaped expan— sion at the other end. This category closely fits the des- cription of dendritic growth cones (Hinds and Hinds 1976). profile with a regular shape containing microtubules but no ribosomes; can contain smooth ER. This category is generally taken to represent unmyelinated axonal cylinders and/or the distal most tips of dendrites (Peters et al., 1976 pp 10). profile with an electron lucent background filled with synap- tic—sized vesicles (40-50 nm in diameter) and mitochondria. This category corresponds to the classical axonal terminal (Peters et al., 1976 pp. 10). profiles, usually large, containing floccular material and synaptic-sized vesicles, usually few in number and/or clumped together. Hanaway and Smith (1979) described profiles similar to these as "light type"degeneration. Gilbert and Stelzner (1979) found profiles like these in normal material from developing rat spinal cord. Falls and Gobel (1979) described profiles such as these as both degenerating and extending. large, electron lucent processes containing mainly smooth ER and clear vesicles, larger than 40—50 nm with thinner mem- branes than synaptic vesicles. The profiles in this category are similar to those Falls and Gobel (1979) described as con- taining addition vesicles and were in the process of either extending or withdrawing. l3 Ved- electron dense processes with clear or electron dense vesicles 40-50 nm in diameter. May contain mitochondria and/or micro- tubules. This category as well as Ed might be taken as simi- lar to what has been described as "dark type" degeneration (e.g. Gilbert and Stelzner 1979, Okado et al., 1979). Ed- electron dense, small processes (many are finger-like in shape) with no discernible organelles or a diffuse mixture of organ- elles. ME- any profile containing microfilaments or any small, finger- like, electron lucent process which appears to fit the spaces between other processes. This category has some of the fea- tures others have ascribed to glia, usually astrocytes (c.f. Peters et al., 1976 pp. 233-244). Unid- unidentified profiles, i.e. those lacking criterial organelles or shape either because they were too small or on the edge of the micrograph. Xcs- extracellular space; an area without organelles bounded by the membranes of surrounding profiles. Measurements After classification, the area of the profiles was measured using either a 1 cm or a 0.5 cm grid overlay (Weible and Bolander, 1974), de— pending on the size and shape of the profile. The areas of large, regu- larly shaped profiles could be accurately approximated using the larger grid. It was felt that smaller profiles, or those with irregular shapes, would be more accurately measured using the smaller grid. Areas were then totalled within each category for each sample of 16 micrographs. The actual total area of tissue examined in each sample was computed in the following manner. In a micrograph, 1 cm2 equals (42,000)2 / 10 umzl cmz, therefore since each micrograph equalled 1824 cm2, a sample of 16 micrographs equals 29184 cmz. This represents approximately 1654 “m2 of tissue. Synaptic density and classification Synaptic density (synapses per 500 um2 area sampled) was measured. 14 A synapse was defined as a paired membrane specialization (thickening) of opposed membranes with one of the included profiles, defined as pre- synaptic, containing electron lucent vesicles 40—50 nm in diameter in close appostion to the membrane specialization. The category of pre- and'post-synaptic (the latter defined as the other profile opposite from the pre-synaptic profile) profiles was also tabulated. In addition, the membrane specialization was classified as asymmetrical (AS) if the post-synaptic specialization was thicker than the pre-synaptic one or symmetrical (SS) if the pre-synaptic specialization was thicker or if the two appeared approximately equal in thickness. Statistical considerations Because only one animal per age was sacrificed, the only valid statistical comparisons which can be made with any of these data is the one considering the effects of treatment, i.e. contralateral (Contra) versus deafferented (Deaff) sides. A t-test for related samples was chosen as the best test since the Deaff and Contra samples were obtained from the same animals. No overall statistic was used because the compar- isons of interest are only those between specific categories within a single animal, Contra versus Deaff sides. Some of the profile categories included in this study have ultrastructural characteristics similar to those that previously published reports suggested were indicative of the onset of some important underlying process. Before analysis of the data, some of the categories were chosen for statistical comparison on the basis of these published reports. This was done to avoid making all possible comparisons and "hunting" for a significant difference with the resultant loss of statistical power from conducting too many tests. The categories chosen were: 15 Elf (possible growth cones). If deafferentation affects growth rates, than the Deaff side could be expected to have fewer of these profiles. Vel (possible "light type" degenerating axonal terminals and/or growth cones). This profile category, if symptomatic of degeneration, would be expected to increase in area on the Deaff side, relative to the Contra. If this category represents growth, then the Contra side might be expected to show a larger area of this type of profile. Vad (possible "addition vesicle" containing profile). The same rationale as for the Vel category was used in including this category for statistical testing. At (axonal terminals). Deafferentation might be expected to result in fewer of these profiles on the Deaff side relative to the Contra side. Ved, Ed (possible "dark type" degeneration). If these categories represent degeneration, then the Deaff side would show an increase in area of thesetypes of profiles over the Contra side. Mf (astrocytic elements). Gilbert and Stelzner (1979) describe a reactive astrocytic engulfment of degenerating neuronal elements in neonatal material. If this occurs in the present case then the Mf category would be expected to have a larger area on the Deaff side than on the Contra side. Mtr (dendrites). Early deafferentation has been shown to reduce the size, number of spines and branching of the dendrites of developing neurons (see Cowan, 1970, review). If this occurs in the present study then areas of the Mtr category on the Deaff side would be expected to be reduced from that on the Contra side. Xcs (extracellular space). Falls and Gobel (1979) described 16 "cavitation of degenerating processes" rather than glial engulfment in material from neonatal kittens. If this process were evident in the present study, then one might expect the Xcs on the Deaff side to increase in area relative to that on the Contra side. RESULTS Profile classification Data The mean area for each category by survival time and treatment (Contra versus Deaff) is shown in Table 1. Brief examination of the means within each column indicates that no consistent differences between the treatments were found. This observation is borne out by the t-tests for related samples performed on the data for those categories mentioned above in which one might, on the basis of previously published reports, expect to see differences in area resulting from removal of the periphery. The calculated t's are given in Table 2. Since t = 3.182, one can readily see that none of the comparisons .05; 3df approaches significance. Note that since the values for the Deaff side were subtracted from those on the Contra Side, a positive value for the t statistic indicates that the area of a particular category from the~ Contra side was greater than that from the Deaff side and vice versa. Figures 1 through 4 demonstrate that in addition to no quantitative differences, the Deaff and Contra cuneate samples showed a remarkable lack of qualitative differences as well. Figures 1 and 2 are taken from the 6 day survival Contra side and Figures 3 and 4 from the 6 day survi— val Deaff side. 17 we see mm mm wmm emm mm: om: me mo mme ewe cam: moi on me mm mmm mam mmm mmm mm . on mam mop La mm mam so .mw so: mam mam mm: on 0» mm was m mm om see so 1mm awn as: mam mm mm we a: m we me off msa cam mom cm: was mma m» sea amp m a o a u a o a o a o a o wax was: use 0:2 m: we amp one man wmm a» me am mo as mm em mm we so use: nae smi moi nma emf am is . am am mm mm em am use me a .2 on. Rm 5 R i a S we Om mm mm B 3 a emf mma mam mom m: mm am so moi mm o: in mm me o one moi ewe mam we em we _ a: mm om mm of Hoe A» m a u a o a u a o a o o u a o L: up: em> u< em> Hm> «Hm muowoumo mfifiwoum .Aosmmqu mo E: poem:Vm u Pom. moEHu mfinmu Eouw Hwesscv Hemoww cofimuo>coo w wcfim: as osmmfiu mo E: ponmsvm om wouuo>coo we use ofinmu osu :« necessz .mmpwm «upon mam Eouu : ”mopfim whucou wen Eouw cum 0 maisfioo c“ mama .asouw ucmsumouu some you consumes zuowoumo mfiwuoue mo AEo poemsvmv moan sees as» geomouawu :cmoZ: m3on may a“ necessz .ofimsmm some aw popswmwe seeHwODUfiE no so pwumscm mo Hosea: sews or» ucowoueou magma mus» a“ HH .9 .m .m mzou ecu cw muwn532 m