I filx'lrf-mf’J-“’ .‘|-..: .. g L‘w ‘ . fl -‘ I . ‘ .." ‘ ‘ ‘ 3» NUCLEOSIDE PHOSPHOTRANSFERASE,‘ Paosmomommx 1, ‘ ‘1 Q 7;- AND cvcuc NUCLEOTIDE PHOSPHODlESTERASE : - ACTMTIES OF CARROT LEAVES ' ' Theazis for the Degree of Ph. D. f MECHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY RALPH JOSEPH VENERE , 1970 ' 0 L I B R A R Y Michigan State mversity rre-s cc: q This is to certify that the thesis entitled Nucleoside Phosphotransferase, Phosphomonoesterase and chlic Nucleotide Phosphodiesterase Avtivities of Carrot Leaves presented by Ralph Joseph Venere has been accepted towards fulfillment of the requirements for _2h..D.._ degree in Wology Major professor Date ?»£..1¢,/7 7/ 0-7639 ABSTRACT NUCLEOSIDE PHOSPHOTRANSFERASE, PHOSPHOMONOESTERASE AND CYCLIC NUCLEOTIDE PHOSPHODIESTERASE ACTIVITIES OF CARROT LEAVES BY Ralph Joseph Venere The objective of the research reported in the first section of this two part thesis was to determine whether carrot leaf phosphotransferase, an enzyme which transfers phosphate from organic phosphate esters to nucleosides, possesses inherent hydrolytic activity toward a phosphate donor, p-nitrophenyl phosphate. The enzyme was fractionated with acetone and ammonium sulfate and purified further by successive ionic and pH gradient elution from DEAE-cellulose columns. The elution profiles of transferase and hydrolase activities showed two separate bands that were congruent. The fractions con- taining major transferase activity were pooled, dialyzed, lyophilized and this purified preparation was used for further investigations. Centrifugation of the preparation in sucrose density gradients at pH 5.0 revealed the presence of single overlapping, but not congruent, bands for the two activities. Sedimentation at lower pH values Ralph Joseph Venere (4.5-3.0) or in 3 M urea demonstrated the presence of several bands of transferase and several bands of phosphatase activities, also overlapping but not con- gruent. The profiles from Sephadex G-200 columns indicated the presence of three species of phospho- transferase having approximate molecular weights of 53,000, 100,000 and 200,000 which were congruent with phosphatase activities. This suggests the existence of monomeric, dimeric and tetrameric forms of the enzymes. Atypical Michaelis plots were obtained for phosphotrans- ferase at low concentrations of the donor but not at high concentrations; a maximum Hill coefficient (n) of 2.3 was obtained when determinations were made with enzyme treated with 0.05 M NaClO Ca salt favoring subunit 4: dissociation. Transferase activity differed greatly from phosphatase activity in sensitivity to heat, to denatur- ants, to inhibitors and stimulators and to pH. It is concluded that phosphotransferase possesses two donor sites and is a protomer which probably possesseS' hydrolytic activity. The data suggest however that hydrolase and transferase sites are different and that non-identical subunits may be derived from the parent enzyme(s). The objectives of the research reported in the second section were two-fold. The first was to determine the kinds of phosphate esters hydrolyzed by a crude carrot Ralph Joseph Venere leaf phosphotransferase preparation; the second was to examine some properties of a system in this preparation which hydrolyzed cyclic nucleotides to inorganic phosphate and adenosine. All of the phosphate esters tested were hydrolyzed with the exception of Vitamin 812' Hence, the crude preparation may be of some value in proving the presence of phosphate in newly-discovered phosphate compounds. Of particular interest was the fact that 3',5'-cyclic nucleotides were hydrolyzed to inorganic phosphate. The hydrolysis of 3',5'-cyclic adenosine monOphosphate was increased by Mg2+ (0.4 mM); Mn2+ (0.4 mM) and F- (6.6 mM) were inhibitory. The major product of the phosphodiesterase component of the system was 3'-adenosine monOphosphate, but small amounts of the 5'-isomer were also detected. An apparent Km of 0.91 mM was determined for diesterase with 3',5'-cyc1ic adenosine monOphosphate and an apparent Km of 3.33 mM was calculated for nucleotidase activity with 3'- adenosine monOphosphate. No apparent substrate speci- ficity for the system was noted since both purine and pyrimidine 3',5'-cyclic nucleotides were hydrolyzed to about the same extent. The preparation also hydrolyzed 2',3'- cyclic adenosine monOphosphate; an apparent Km of 1.45 mM.was calculated for this substrate. Centrifugation in sucrose gradients yielded three bands hydrolyzing Ralph Joseph Venere 2',3'-cyclic adenosine monOphosphate but only two hydrolyzing 3',5'-cyclic adenosine monOphosphate. It is concluded that higher plants do indeed possess enzymes capable of hydrolyzing 3',5'-cyclic nucleotides. This suggests that such compounds may be physiologically active in higher plant tissue. The prOperties described for the system indicate that the phosphodiesterases have different properties than those described from animal sources. NUCLEOSIDE PHOSPHOTRANSFERASE, PHOSPHOMONOESTERASE AND CYCLIC NUCLEOTIDE PHOSPHODIESTERASE ACTIVITIES OF CARROT LEAVES By Ralph Joseph Venere A THESIS Submitted to Michigan State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Department of Botany and Plant Pathology 1970 To my wife, Florence and son, Ralph ii ACKNOWLEDGMENT S It is extremely difficult to acknowledge everyone who has made a contribution towards this study. It is even more difficult to express the gratitude that must be extended to Dr. Clifford J. Pollard, my major professor. Only through his intense desire to provide everyone of his students with all the guidance and encouragement that he is able to provide could this study have been completed. The perseverance and dedication to his work which he always displayed provided much needed inspiration. Sincere appreciation must also be extended Us Drs. N. E. Good, R. P. Scheffer and F. M. Rottman who served as members of the guidance committee. A very special thank you must be given to Dr. Jessica Reimann for her instruction and advice during the kinetic studies. I would also like to thank Dr. Geoffrey Kennedy for the technical assistance which he provided concerning the preparation of the Sephadex column. This work was supported in part by a Biomedical Sciences Support Grant from the National Institutes of Health . iii TABLE OF CONTENTS Page DEDICATION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . iii LIST OF TABLES . . . . . . . . . . . . . Vi LIST OF FIGURES . . . . . . . . . . . . . Vii SECTION I. NUCLEOSIDE PHOSPHOTRANSFERASE AND PHOSPHOMONOESTERASE INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 MATERIALS AND METHODS . . . . . . . . . . . 7 Plant Source . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 Chemicals . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 Enzyme Preparations . . . . . . . . . . . 8 Protein Determinations . . . . . . . . . . 10 Enzyme Assays . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 Preparation and Assay of Sucrose Density Gradients. 13 Preparation of the Sephadex G-200 Column . . . . 15 RESULTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 Modification of DEAE— Cellulose Column Chromatography Purification Steps . . . . . . . . 17 A Compsrison of Some PrOperties of the Phospho- transferase and Phosphomonoesterase Activities . 21 Time Course . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 Effect of pH . . . . . . . . . . 22 Effect of Exposure to Acetate Buffer, pH 5.2 and to Tris Buffer, pH 8.0 . . . . . . . . 24 Effect of Increasing Temperature . . . . . . 28 Effects of Monovalent and Divalent Cations . . 31 Inhibition by EDTA and NaF . . . . . . . . 33 Effect of Denaturing Agents . . . . . . . 35 Kinetic Studies on Phosphotransferase and PhOSphomonoesterase Activities . . . . . . 42 Sedimentation in Sucrose Density Gradients . . 52 Evidence that Phosphotransferase Possesses Hydrolytic Activity . . . . . . . . . . 59 iv Page DISCUSSION 0 O O O O O O O O C O O O O 66 SECTION II. CYCLIC NUCLEOTIDE PHOSPHODIESTERASE INTRODUCTION 0 O O O O I I O O I O I O O 7 6 MATERIALS AND METHODS . . . . . . . . . . . 80 Enzyme Source . . . . . . . . . . . . . 80 Chemicals I O O O O O O O I O O O O O 80 Enzyme Assays . . . . . . . . . . 80 Determination of Nucleotide Intermediate . . . . 82 Sucrose Density Gradients . . . . . . . . . 83 RESULTS 0 O O O O I O O O O O O O O O 85 Substrate Specificity of Crude Phosphotransferase . 85 Some Properties of the Cyclic Nucleotide Phosphodiesterase System from Carrot Leaves . . 87 Time Course . . . . . . . . . . . . . 87 Effect of Temperature . . . . . . . . . 87 pH Optimum . . . . . . . . . 91 Effect of MgZ+, Mn2+ and F . . . . . . . 91 Identification of Reaction Products . . . . . 94 Sucrose Density Gradient Analysis . . . . . 95 Michaelis Constants . . . . . . . . . . 95 DISCUSSION 0 I O O O O O O O O O O O O 99 LITERATURE CITED 0 O O O O O O O C C O O 103 LIST OF TABLES Effect of time of incubation on the phosphorylation ratio . . . . . . . . Effect of exposure to high temperatures on enzymic activity . . . . . . . . . . Effect of cytidine on the activity of phospho- transferase exposed at 60°C . . . . . . Effect of various cations on enzymic activity . Approximate molecular weight of three phospho- transferase bands eluted from a Sephadex G-200 COlumn o o o o o o o o o o 0 Relative apparent rates of hydrolysis of various organic phosphate esters by "Crude Phosphotransferase" from carrot leaves . . Relative apparent rates of hydrolysis of various cyclic nucleotide substrates by "Crude Phosphotransferase" from carrot leaves . . Effect of Mgz+, Mn2+, and F- on phosphodiester- ase activity . . . . . . . . . . . vi Page 22 30 32 34 63 86 88 93 lik‘va.’ urn I.J¢ 10. ll. 12. 13. LIST OF FIGURES Sodium chloride gradient elution of "Crude Phosphotransferase" from a DEAE-cellulose collumn . . . . . . . . . . . . pH gradient elution of "Partially Purified Phosphotransferase" from a DEAE—cellulose column . . . . . . . . . . . . . Time courses of phosphotransferase and phosphomonoesterase activities . . . . . Effect of pH on enzyme activity . . . . . Effect of exposure to acetate or tris buffers on enzyme activity . . . . . . . . . Effect of increasing temperature on enzyme aCtiVitieS O O O O O O O O O O 0 Effect of EDTA concentration on enzyme activity . . . . . . . . . . . . Effect of sodium fluoride on enzyme activity . Effect of HgClz concentration on phospho- transferase and phosphomonoesterase activities . . . . . . . . . . . Activation and inactivation of enzyme activity by urea . . . . . . . . . . . . Effects of alcohols and acetone on enzyme activity . . . . . . . . . . . . Effect of increasing amounts of phosphate donor substrate on the velocity of phospho- transferase . . . . . . . . . . . 'Velocity of phosphotransferase as a function of phosphate donor concentration obtained for acetate and perchlorate treated samples . . vii Page 18 20 23 25 27 29 36 37 39 4O 41 43 47 Figure Page 14. Double reciprocal plot for pNPP in the phosphotransferase reaction . . . . . . 48 15. Hill plots of the phosphotransferase reaction. 50 16. Reciprocal plots of phosphotransferase at high pNPP concentrations . . . . . . . . 51 1?. Kinetic pattern of pNPP saturation in the phOSphomonoesterase reaction . . . . . 53 18. Reciprocal plot for pNPP in the phosphomono- esterase reaction . . . . . . . . . 54 19. Ultracentrifugation pattern of enzyme activi- ties as a function of pH . . . . . . . 56 20. Effect of urea on the sedimentation profiles of phosphotransferase and phosphomono- esterase . . . . . . . . . . . . 58 21. Chromatography of "Purified Phosphotransferase" on a Sephadex G-200 column . . . . . . 61 22. Determination of molecular weights of phosphotransferase by chromatography on Sephadex G-200 . . . . . . . . . . 62 23. Ultracentrifugation pattern of "Purified Phosphotransferase" in sucrose gradients at pH 5.2 in 0.1 M acetate . . . . . . . 64 24. Time course of the formation of Pi by the crude phosphodiesterase preparation . . . 89 25. Phosphodiesterase activity as a function of increasing temperature . . . . . . . 90 26. Effect of pH on phosphodiesterase activity . 92 27. Ultracentrifugation patterns of phosphodi- esterase activity with 3'c5'-cAMP and 2',3'- cAMP as substrate . . . . . . . . . 96 28. Comparison of the Michaelis constants for 3'- nucleotidase and cyclic nucleotide phosphodi- esterase activities . . . . . . . . 97 viii SECTION I NUCLEOSIDE PHOSPHOTRANSFERASE AND PHOSPHOMONOESTERASE INTRODUCTION The first reports concerning enzymes capable of transferring organically esterified phosphate to nucleo- side acceptors were made by Brawerman and Chargaff (1, 2) in 1953. Subsequent studies (3, 4) provided details with respect to specificities of donors and acceptors, as well as a determination of the nucleotide isomer formed. Information was also given on the distribution of the «enzymes in different cells and tissues. As a result of ‘these studies a provisional classification of the various leinds of enzymes found was provided (5). Thus, the enzymes from plants and some microorganisms preferred a 5'-nucleo- 'tide donor and produced only 5'-nucleotides as products. Ihizymes from most mammalian tissue preferred phenyl {fluDSphate as donor; giving rise to 5'-nucleotides as well as snail quantities (5-10%) of the 2'-and 3'-isomers. Human.prostate preparations, however, utilized phenyl PhOSphate or 3'-nuc1eotide equally as donors, preferred deoxyriboside acceptors and produced, in addition to the 5"ntu:1eotides, a significant amount of 3'-nucleotides. When Jribosides were used as acceptors considerable amounts 0f tins 2'-nuc1eotides were formed. These enzymes were calls“: nucleoside phosphotransferases due to their specificity for nucleoside acceptors. The pH optimum of 5.2 in acetate buffer was the same as the pH Optimum for the acid phosphomonoesterase activity that was present in all of the preparations tested. Several years later Katagiri g£_§1. (6), utilizing a cell free extract as well as a partially purified enzyme preparation from Escherichia coli, showed that a predomi- nance of 3'-inosinic acid was formed when p-nitrOphenyl- phosphate (pNPP) served as donor and inosine as the acceptor in the phosphotransferase reaction. Mitsugi g£_§l, (7) and Mitsugi (8, 9) studied in detail the dis- tribution and prOperties of phosphotransferases in a large number of cell-free extracts of bacterial origin. In a series of papers in which the acceptor specificity of nucleoside phosphotransferase was studied (10-15), it was concluded that the isomeric product formed was dependent on the particular strain of bacteria used as the enzyme source. Thus, they did not consider the classification set forth by Brawerman and Chargaff to be absolute. It should be mentioned that Roberts (16) also took exception 'to the classification of Brawerman and Chargaff. He <3laimed the separation of a distinct nucleoside phospho- transferase enzyme from an Azgna_leaf preparation that was able to synthesize adenosine 3'-phosphate from adenosine 5'- phosphate and adenosine. This was in contrast to the carrot root preparation which could form only the 5'-isomer. bacte: possi? in th suppo conce the p Brawe incre the g muscl incre surpa Morec Phos; Sperm feras The presence of these transfer enzymes in animal, bacterial and plant cells provides some support for the possibility that nucleoside phosphotransferases take part in the cellular biosynthesis of nucleotides. Additional support for this role is suggested from investigations concerning the activity of these enzymes in relation to the physiological state of the tissue being studied. Brawerman and Chargaff (4) showed that a significant increase in phosphotransferase activity occurred during the germination of wheat, the regeneration of rabbit muscle, and during the growth of bacterial cells. This increase in phosphotransferase activity was shown to far surpass the increase in phosphomonoesterase activity. Moreover, during the germination of wheat the increase of phosphomonoesterase activity was found in both the endo- sperm and in the shoot whereas the rise in phosphotrans- ferase activity was found only in the growing shoot. The presence of phOSphomonoesterase activity in all preparations used in the above studies tended to obscure the true synthetic capacity of the phosphotrans- ferase. The importance of the enzyme in nucleotide synthesis could be evaluated better if it could be ascertained whether or not an enzyme which is free from hydrolytic activity exists. Tunis and Chargaff (l7), utilizing an enzyme preparation from carrot root tissue, attempted.to separate proteins responsible for the two activities. Although unsuccessful, they were able to demonstrate that c0pper or zinc ions specifically inhibited the phosphomonoesterase aCtivity. Further treatment of their preparation with Celite removed additional hydrolytic activity; it has also been reported that the enzymes can be separated by paper electrophoresis (18). It was con- cluded that two different enzymes were responsible for the two observed activities. Mitsugi (9) also claimed that the bacterial nucleoside phosphotransferases were distinct from the acid phosphomonoesterases on the basis of the (iifferential effects of various inhibitors and metallic ions on both activities. Brunngraber and Chargaff (19) prepared carrot root jphosphotransferase by a method affording a purification of Inore than 1700 fold. Nevertheless, a significant amount of hydrolytic activity was present in the preparation. It teas not determined whether the phosphomonoesterase activity \vas associated with the phosphotransferase enzyme or \vhether it was merely present as a contaminant of the preparation. Recently, Becker and Pollard (20) devised a purifi- <:ation scheme for the nucleoside phOSphotransferases of carrot leaves. This preparation also contained a significant amount of phOSphomonoesterase activity. No attempts were made to determine conclusively if the phosphotransferase activity was associated with a protein distinct from the phosphomonoesterase. However, it was mentioned that distinct entities might exist; on the basis of slight differences observed in the elution profiles from the diethylaminoethyl (DEAE)-cellulose purification steps (21). The objective of this section of the thesis was to investigate more fully the nucleoside phosphotransferase of carrot leaves in an attempt to discern whether the enzyme possesses phOSphomonoesterase activity. MATERIALS AND METHODS Plant Source Seeds of Burpee's Golden Chantenay carrot (Daucus carota) variety were purchased from a local supplier. The seeds were sowed by hand in the field in late June and the plants were harvested three months afterwards. Healthy green leaves, free from visible signs of infection, were cut from the large taproot, washed thoroughly in tap water and utilized as a source for the enzyme preparations. Chemicals All chemicals were purchased commercially. They were of the highest purity available and were not subjected to further purification. Tritiated uridine (ICN, Sp. Act: 616 mc/mM), kindly donated by Larry Pelcher, was used as acceptor in several studies. The radiochemical purity of this material was found to be greater than 98% by chroma- tography of the sample in a system of 75% ethanol--10 per cent saturated (NH4)ZSO4 impregnated paper (22). DEAE- Cellulose was purchased from Sigma Chemical Company, St. Louis, Missouri. Sephadex G-200 was kindly donated by Dr. Fritz Rottman. Enzyme Preparations Phosphotransferase was prepared by a method very similar to that described by Becker and Pollard (20). All operations were performedjxithe cold (3-4°C). Two kilograms of the washed leaves were homogenized in a Waring blendor with one liter of 0.1 M sodium acetate at pH 5.1 by successive re-homogenizations and filtrations through cheesecloth. The leaves were added in 50-100 gram portions to about 300 m1 of buffer, homogenized and the slurry was filtered through the cheesecloth into a stainless steel beaker set in an ice bath. This procedure was continued until all the leaves were homogenized. Initial purification was made by collecting the fraction precipitating between 30 and 70 per cent by volume of cold acetone (-20°C) by centrifugation (10,000 X g for 10 minutes). The pellet was dissolved in cold distilled 'water and further purified by.(NH4)ZSO4 fractionation. The fraction precipitating between 40 and 80 per cent of saturation was collected by centrifugation (10,000 X g for 10 minutes) and dissolved in a minimum amount of 0.1 M acetate buffer of pH 5.0. This solution was subsequently dialyzed against this same buffer, lyOphilized and stored at -20°C for further use. This preparation was designated "Crude Phosphotransferase." For further purification, the "Crude Phosphotrans- ferase" preparation was applied to a 22 X 1.5 cm column of diethylaminoethyl (DEAE)-ce11ulose (acid and base washed) that had been equilibrated with 500 m1 of a buffer con— sisting of 0.005 M MgAc and 0.01 M Tris (MAT-buffer), pH 7.5. The protein was eluted from the column with a linear NaCl gradient (0-1 M) prepared according to the principles of the double chambered gradient preparing device of Britten and Roberts (23). The device employed in the present studies, however, consisted of two plastic bottles connected to the column in series with small diameter rubber tubing rather than the doubled chambered block of Lucite described by these authors. The bottle connected directly to the column served as the mixing chamber. Solutions in this chamber were mixed with a magnetic stirring bar. The second bottle (reservoir chamber) contained the buffered NaCl solution. The flow rate in all experiments was maintained at about 24 ml per hour. The eluant was collected in 10 ml fractions with a fraction collector. Aliquots were assayed for the desired enzymatic activity and those fractions containing peak transferase activities were pooled, dialyzed overnight against four liters of cold distilled water and concentrated by freeze-drying. This preparation, designated "Partially Purified Phosphotransferase," was stored at -20°C until needed. To obtain phosphotransferase of a higher degree of purity, a second DEAE-cellulose column was prepared as 10 described above except that it was equilibrated overnight with 500 ml of a buffer consisting of 0.05 M malic acid, 0.025 M acetic acid and 0.05 M maleic acid adjusted to pH 6.0 with NaOH (MAM-buffer). "Partially Purified Phospho- transferase" preparation (100 mg of protein) was taken up in cold glass distilled water, dialyzed against MAM- buffer of pH 6.0 and subsequently applied to the DEAE- cellulose column. Elution was carried out with a linear pH gradient (1000 ml) prepared with the same device described above. Thus, 500 m1 of MAM—buffer (pH 6.0) was placed in the mixing chamber and 500 ml of MAM-buffer (pH 1.2) was added to the reservoir chamber and the eluate collected in 10 ml fractions. Fractions exhibiting peak transferase activity were pooled and dialyzed overnight against two liters of cold glass distilled water. The dialyzed protein was lyOphilized and subsequently stored at -20°C. This preparation was designated "Purified Phosphotransferase." ‘ Protein Determinations Proteins eluting from the DEAE-cellulose columns were estimated by their absorbance at 280 nm. When the Protein concentration was too low to be measured adequately by this means, the method described by Lowry §E_al. (24) was used. Protein concentration of the various enzyme Preparations was determined by the method described by ll Warburg and Christian (25). It should be noted that the protein content in most cases where direct SpectrOphoto- metric assays were made is merely an approximation of the true amount present. The presence of a brown color, probably due to polyphenolic material, was observed in practically every preparation. This color no doubt inter- fered with the determinations. The only material free from this brown color was that obtained after passage through the second DEAE-cellulose column and that eluted from a Sephadex G-200 column. Enzyme Assays Nucleoside Phosphotransferase.--The standard assay used for the determination of phosphotransferase activity consisted of incubating 3 Umoles of pNPP, lu Inole of cytidine, and the appropriate amount of enzyme in a final volume of 0.3 ml of 0.1 M sodium acetate buffer of pH 5.0. The enzyme solution had been diluted so as to insure linear product formation during incubation. The incubation time was usually one-half to one hour at 37°C and the reaction was stopped by boiling for 5 Ininutes in a water bath. The amount of enzymically formed nucleotide was (determined by separation of the entire reaction mixture \Iia paper electrophoresis. The electrolyte consisted of 0.01 M EDTA (tetrasodium salt) to which 0.34 ml of Pyridine per liter was added. The solution was adjusted 12 to pH 3.5 with glacial acetic acid. Electrophoresis was of 6 hours duration at 400 volts potential (13.3 volts/cm). ElectrOphoresis was followed by elution of the UV absorbing area of the dried electrophoretograms correspond- ing to cytidine monOphosphate (CMP) with 0.1 N HCl and spectrOphotometric analysis at 280 nm. Readings were made against a control sample treated identically except that enzyme was replaced by an equal volume of buffer or by enzyme boiled at 100°C for five minutes. When 3H-uridine (6 mM) was used as the phosphate acceptor, experiments were conducted in a manner similar to that described above. After the reaction mixture was streaked onto the electrOphoresis paper, unlabelled carrier uridine monOphosphate (UMP) was applied. Electro- phoresis was performed as given above and the UV light absorbing area was cut from each paper strip in 2 cm sections. These were placed in counting vials containing 15 m1 of toluene in which the phosphors 1,4—bis-2-(4- methyl-S-phenyloxazolyl)-benzene (0.3 g/liter) and 2,5 diphenyloxazole (5 g/liter) were dissolved. Radio- activity of samples was determined in a Packard 3003 Tri- Carb scintillation spectrometer. Controls, using 3H-uridine but no active enzyme were also run. Trans~ ferase activity is expressed either as mumoles of nucleotide formed per hour or as cmp incorporated into 3H-UMP per hour. mob en: InCI pro< Act: p-n: mini (27) cont agai eXpr of p is t Phos lar . of t] with by Ma 2'3 m. in the l3 Phosphomonoesterase.--For the standard assay, 3p moles of organic phosphate ester were incubated with the enzyme in 0.3 ml of 0.10 M sodium acetate of pH 5.0. Incubations were carried out over a period during which product formation was linear; usually 10 to 30 minutes. Activity was estimated by determining the amount of p-nitr0phenol (pNP) released from pNPP (26) or by deter- mining the amount of inorganic phosphate (Pi) released (27). ApprOpriate substrate controls and boiled enzyme controls were utilized. Experimental samples were read against these controls. Phosphomonoesterase activity is expressed as mumoles of pNP released per hour. The phosphorylation ration (#) is the molar ratio of phosphate transferred to p-nitrophenol released. R/R° is the ratio of the rate of phosphotransferase or phosphomonoesterase activity in the presence of a particu- 1ar compound to the rate of either activity in the absence of the compound. Preparation and Assay of Sucrose Density Gradients Linear sucrose gradients (5%-20%) were prepared with a double chambered device similar to that described by Martin and Ames (28). A solution of 20% sucrose (2.2- 2.3 ml) in 0.1 M acetate buffer (pH 3-5.2) was contained .in the mixing chamber and an equal volume of a 5% sucrose solut: The S' the t1 an ai was a ing. hour . milli. gradit 0.20 1 at 38 at th( with . four . colle. gradi. in th. “mks APPaI. aceta. drawn PhOSp1 ratio deterr 14 solution in the same buffer was placed in the reservoir. The stopcock connecting the two chambers was opened and the two solutions were mixed by a glass rod attached to an air driven stirrer. In certain instances urea (3M) was added to the buffered sucrose Solutions prior to mix- ing. The prepared gradients were chilled at 4°C for one hour at which time a solution containing 0.12 to 3.0 milligrams of protein was very carefully pipetted onto the gradient surface. The gradients were sealed with 0.15- 0.20 ml of paraffin oil and then spun in a SW 39L rotor at 38,000 rpm for 31-34 hours at l-2°C. Fractions were collected by piercing the tubes at the bottom with a needle device set up in conjunction with a drop counting device which was preset to collect four drOpS per fraction. Usually, 30-32 fractions were collected (approximately 0.155 ml/fraction). When gradients were prepared in acetate buffer at pH 3.0 or in the presence of 3M urea, a noticeable increase in the number of fractions was detected (42-44 fractions). Apparently, this was due to a reduction in the drop size. Each fraction was diluted with 1 ml of 0.1 M acetate buffer of pH 5.0. Aliquots of 0.10 ml were with- drawn and assayed for enzymatic activity. Assays for phosphotransferase were carried out with a donor:acceptor ratio of 5:1. The phosphomonoesterase activity was determined with 5 umoles of pNPP. The amount of protein pres meth 110' then atel} 5.2 The c month trans pH 5 aceta of th fract 15 present was too low to be detected by commonly employed methods. Preparation of the Sephadex G-200 Column Sephadex G-200 was heated in water at 100°C briefly, allowed to cool and kept at 4°C overnight. The slurry was then used to prepare a column (45 X 2 cm) which was immedi- ately equilibrated with 0.1 M sodium acetate buffer of pH 5.2 (200 ml) at a flow rate of approximately 10 ml per hour. The column was then left in the cold room at 4°C for two months after which time a solution of "Purified Phospho- transferase" (14 mg of protein in 2 ml of 0.1 M acetate, pH 5.2) was applied and subsequently eluted with the same acetate buffer and at the flow rate used for equilibration of the column. Fractions of 3.8 ml were collected with a fraction collector. The column was calibrated by determining the elution volume (Ve) of reference standards. The void volume (Vo) was determined with blue dextran. Reference standards of cytochrome c and hemoglobin were detected spectrOphotometri- cally at 412 nm, apoferritin at 230 nm and blue dextran at 625 nm. Catalase was assayed by following the decrease in absorbance at 240 nm due to the destruction of hydrogen peroxide, as described by Chance and Maehly (29), and alkaline phosphatase was detected by the increase in absorbance of pNP at 410 nm in 0.05 M HEPES at pH 8.5. A plot of elution volume against the log molecular weight of the reference standards was prepared and approximate 16 molecular weights of phosphotransferase and phosphomono- esterase were determined from this plot. RESULTS Modification of DEAE-Cellulose Column Chromatography Purification Steps In the purification scheme for the preparation of nucleoside phosphotransferase enzyme from carrot leaves, two DEAE-cellulose chromatography steps were employed by Becker and Pollard (20). A linear gradient of buffered sodium chloride was used for the elution of protein from the first column and the protein applied to a second column was eluted with a pH gradient. It was thought that successful separation of the phosphotransferase and phosphomonoesterase activities might be achieved by modifying their elution conditions. Thus, changes were made in eluant volume, sodium chloride con- centration and steepness of the pH gradient in an effort to separate the activities. Only the final conditions used to obtain the "Purified Phosphotransferase" will be described. The conditions utilized for the elution of "Crude Phosphotransferase" (200 mg protein) by a linear gradient of buffered sodium chloride were similar to those described by Becker and Pollard (20) except for the eluant volume. Figure 1 is a typical elution profile for phosphotransferase l7 18 v / S 4 |_a 0 ON mu moles pNP/hr x 10—2 W a mu moles CMP/hr x 10 2 H is RWWW ///O / 4b 5'0 '6'0 7‘6 "86' £57) 100 LA) 0 Fraction Number Figure 1. Sodium chloride gradient elution of "Crude Phosphoa Protein (OD 280) transferase from a DEAE-cellulose column. A column (22 x 1.5 cm) was prepared and equilibrated with 0.01 M tris containing 0.005 M MgAc buffered at pH 7.5. The column was developed with one liter of a linear NaCl gradient (0-1 M) prepared in the same buffer. The flow rate was maintained at 24 ml per hour and the volume of the fractions collected was 10 ml. Indicated in the figure are the elution profiles obtained for phosphomonoesterase (C>), phosphotransferase ([3) and protein (--).‘ The hatched area indicates the fractions that were pooled for further purification. This preparation is "Partially Purified Phosphotransferase". activ: the v ester capat Phos; that trans trans respc Prote linea PH 1. used Steer 3 vex be a1 00th the E two i of h} h: ‘*QUr PhOSp 19 activity, phosphomonoesterase activity and protein when the volume of eluant used was one liter. The broad elution profile for the phosphomono- esterase activity suggested that more than one enzyme capable of hydrolyzing pNPP was present in the "Crude Phosphotransferase" preparation. It was possible, then, that one of these enzymes was also responsible for the transferase activity. However, the possibility that a transferase enzyme which was devoid of phosphatase was responsible for this activity could not be ruled out. "Partially Purified PhOSphotransferase" (100 mg protein) was eluted from a DEAE-cellulose column with a linear pH gradient (1000 m1) buffered from pH 6.0 to pH 1.2 instead of the range of from pH 5.75 to pH 1.8 used by Becker and Pollard (20). This change in the steepness of the pH gradient was made because in so doing a very active band of phosphomonoesterase activity could be almost completely removed from the phosphotransferase activity (Figure 2). It should also be noted that under these conditions the phosphotransferase activity eluted from the column in two bands. Both transferase bands were eluted with bands of hydrolytic activity. Fractions indicated by the hatched areas in Figure 2A were pooled and served as the "Purified Phosphotransferase" preparation. 20 .muaon mo oocuofi ecu mo cocaaumumo mo caououm How waflmoum cofiucam .m .smmmummmamuuonmmonm.ooflmwncm= ma coaumnmmmnm mcHuHSmmH one .cmaoom mcowuomum on“ mouooaocw mono venous: one _.Anuv ommummmcmuuonmmosm can Anus ommumummocoaoammosm mom maamoum coausam .d .HE ca mos mcowuooum ecu mo oEsHo> may one noon you He am on Macs was open 30Hm.msa .Auao>ummmu may cw. N.H no mo Mommas mo HE com com Honsoso mcHNHE,mnu ca Ao.m may Hmmmco mEMm wasp m0 H8 com zuw3 cwnmflanmumm me? cacaoo mop moam>mc on com: Anus ucwficoum mm one .o.m mm on pace OHonE z mo.o one cfioo capoom z mmo.o .ofloo oaama z mo.o mo mcflumflmcoo Hmmmsn m sua3.omumunwaflcwm mm3 Aao m.H x was cacaoo one .cacaoc omoasaawo Imdmo o Eonm =mmouommcmnuocmmonm coflmansm maaowpuom= mo coauoao ucoflcoum mm .m madman Honssz coauoenm noossz cowuoonm om ov om om 0H OCH om om on om cm 0% on om 0H 0 ll IIIWI-rm / i - . - .. urns" 1. o ‘ Ju/fl \- H 7 e To, V“ a , a :N 1 m d d .m I x 1 n w «.0- -1 we ..m m a r I o r. a .L n s m w, . m : a a _L m o. wums C v Anna S I u. 0 1 x «.91 e M 1 m . 7v m d [MW/AV :o 21 A Comparison of Some Properties of the Phosphotransferase and Phosphomono- esterase Activities Since all attempts at separating transferase activity from phosphomonoesterase activity by ion exchange on DEAR-cellulose columns failed, it appeared likely that both activities were associated with the same enzyme; it would seem to be more than fortuitous that each transferase eluted by a linear pH gradient was accompanied by a band of hydrolytic activity (Figure 2). However, the possi- bility also existed that the two activities were the result of different enzymes. If the first case were true, then an investigation of some general biochemical and physical prOperties associated with bothactivities would possibly yield similar results. However, if the two activities were due to different enzymes, then marked dif— ferences in preperties might be obtained. Thus, experiments comparing some general prOperties of both activities were conducted. Time Course In order to obtain significant results from these investigations, it was necessary to make certain that significant transfer of phosphate to the nucleoside acceptor took place, that the release of hydrolysis product was also measurable and that both were prOportional to the time of incubation. 22 A time course of product formation for each of the activities was determined (Figure 3). It can be seen that the formation of the nucleotide and the hydrolysis of the phosphate donor remained essentially linear when tested under the standard assay conditions (molar ratio of donor: acceptor--3:1). At the maximum time allowed for the reaction (1 hr), 9.7% of the pNPP was hydrolyzed while 5.4% of the cytidine was phosphorylated. Table 1 shows that the phosphorylation ratio (phosphate transferred/pNP released) declined at 1 hour of incubation. For this reason, an incubation period of 30 minutes was normally used in most studies. When it was noted that the initial rate of hydrolytic activity was low the time of incubation was extended accordingly. TABLE l.--Effect of time of incubation on the phosphoryla- tion ratio. Time of Incubation (minutes) Phosphorylation Ratio 20 .208 40 .218 60 .185 Effect of pH The pH optimum for the phosphotransferase reaction in 0.1 M acetate buffer was found to be about pH 4.5 23 3.- o ‘7' 3 -~ 50 H 2T T 40 0. Q 5 e ° a. m. u~30 3 O 3 51 E 1.. .. 2 2° 2 :L s 8 o o 10 20 30 40 so 60 Time (minutes) Figure 3. phosphomonoesterase activities. Time courSes of phosphotransferase and Phosphotransferase is expressed as mu moles CMP synthesized per hour (C1) and phosphomonoesterase as mu moles pNP liberated per hour (C)). _ _._____ (Fig 5.21 by B phos; furtl seen acti‘ compe ester 24 (Ffiigure 4). This is somewhat less than the value of pH 5..2 determined by Becker (21) and the pH of 5.0 reported by Brunngraber and Chargaff (16) . Although a pH Optimum of 4.5 was noted for the jpruosphotransferase reaction, it was decided to conduct fiirther investigations at a pH of 5.0 since, as will be seeen.later, at this pH the transferase and hydrolytic arztivities sedimented in sucrose gradients as one band in <2cunparison to the several bands detected at pH 4.5. Two pH Optima were observed for the phosphomono- esterase activity. The first appeared in the vicinity of pfli 4.2; the second was close to pH 5.0. Brunngraber and CHmargaff also reported two pH optima for the hydrolytic euztivity present in their preparation. However they curtained values of pH 5.0 and pH 6.0 to 6.5. No comparison deth Becker's preparation could be made since no value for hywirolytic activity was presented. It is possible that digfferences in the purification methods account for the VEtriations in pH optima noted for the various preparations. Eifect of Exposure to Acetate £2581)ng 5.2 and to Tris .Efljfer, pH 8.0 Since the two activities exhibited differences in PH Optima, it was thought that some information on the two aetivities could be obtained by exposing the "Purified Preparation" to different buffers whose pK values were on 25 31 «#30 N I O " :3 >4 \ H 94 fl 2 1-20 5 3 e "‘ '3 2’} s v-1 0 I1 e 1- -—10 E 1 s Figure 4. Effect of pH on enzyme activity. (0) phosphotransferase; (O) phosphomonoesterase. _.—-—— the wer kep or int late ace‘ tie: that dec] Note shor retr two- aCti uPOn deal buff duIi: the . aflier trans a‘Ctir 26 the acid or alkaline side of neutrality. Thus, experiments were conducted in which "Purified Phosphotransferase" was kept either at pH 5.2 in 0.1 M acetate buffer (pK = 4.76) or at pH 8.0 in 0.1 M Tris buffer (pK = 8.1). At intervals aliquots were withdrawn and assayed. Figure 5A Shows that both activities were stimu- lated during the first fifteen minutes of exposure to acetate buffer at pH 5.2. Although the per cent stimula- tions are different, the curves resemble each other in that the initial increase of activity is followed by a decline in both transferase and hydrolytic activities. Note that the effect on phosphomonoesterase is small and short lived; after 60 minutes exposure the activity had returned to the original level. On the other hand a two-fold stimulation was noted in phosphotransferase activity at that time. In contrast to the stimulation of the activities upon exposure to acetate buffer pH 5.2, both activities declined when the preparation was kept at pH 8.0 in Tris buffer (Figure 5B). The rate of loss was very similar during the first ten minutes of exposure. Afterwards, the transferase activity declined at a faster rate. Thus, after 60 minutes of exposure only 2% of the original transferase activity remained whereas 48% of the hydrolytic activity was retained. % Initial Activity 27 l A l n l n l L ‘ U V V f v ‘ I r f 10 20 30 40 50 60 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 Time (Minutes) Time (Minutes) Figure 5. Effect of exposure to acetate or tris buffers on- enzyme activity. Individual 0.01 ml portiOns of "Purified Phosphotransferase" were diluted with 9.99 ml of either (A) 0.1 M acetate (pH 5.2) or (B) 0.1 M tris (pH 8.0). The enzyme solutions were kept at 23°C. At the indicated time intervals, 0.1 ml aliquots of the enzyme solution were with- drawn and assayed for either phosphotransferase ([3) or phosphomonoesterase (CD); The curves presented in the figure represent the values obtained from one of three separate experiments. 28 Effect of Increasing Temperature Like the majority of chemical reactions, enzymat- ically controlled reactions show increased rates at increased temperatures. However, under a given set of conditions, there is a temperature beyond which the rate begins to decline due to the thermal denaturation of the enzyme. This temperature is called the Optimum temperature for that set of conditions. The results of such a study for the transferase and hydrolytic activities are presented in Figure 6. Phosphotransferase activity showed a greater sensitivity to increased temperature, becoming increasingly less active between 39°-62°C. In contrast, phosphomono- esterase activity continually increased up to 62°C, the highest temperature used. To test for enzyme instability, "Purified Phosphotransferase" was exposed to temperatures of either 50°C or 60°C in 0.1 M acetate buffer, pH 5.0. At the indicated time (Table 2), an aliquot of the prepara- tion was withdrawn and assayed for either phosphomono- esterase or phosphotransferase activities by the standard assay procedures. About 26% of the phosphomonoesterase activity was lost during the first 15 minutes of exposure at 50°C. This level of activity was retained over the next 15 minutes of exposure. Under the same conditions, phosphotransferase activity was enhanced by 14% during the first 15 minutes; afterwards 32% of the initial activity was lost. At 60°C, complete loss of phosphotransferase 29 220 + 200 H 180 "24 a g 1 -~20 a. g 140 5 4,16 .3 120 .3 o 100 . a -r12 2 so :1- :1- 5 60 . 8 E 40 20 ‘ 4 1o 20 30 4o 50 60 70 Temperature (°C) JFigure 6. Effect of increasing temperature on enzyme (activities. Except for the reaction being run at the .indicated temperatures, conditions for the determination of transferase (Cl) and phosphatase '(0 ) were the same as for the standard procedure .. 30 .HQ Hem ceospoum mzo meHQEJE Hm u emeuemmcenuosmmosm How muu>uuom eucHOmodo .Hc Hem oemmeaeu mzm meHoE: v.o u emmueumeocoEocmmosm How muu>wuom eucHOmnme 0 mm 3 0 mm 3. o 3 3 o S 3 o S . m .8 as E 3 a: E 3 .3 0.03 «.03 0 83:8 emeuemmceuuocmmocm emeueumeocosocmmocm Ameuccafiv ensumnemsea muu>uuo¢ e>uueaem eeua eusmomxm .mucefiuuemxe floccuuuoce 03u CH cecueuoo euez mefluu>uuom cuoo you mecae> ueHuEum .mufl>uuoe emmuosmmonm no emmuemmcenu Hecuue you Uohm um cemMmme one czencsuu3 cecu mmz uocvuae HE oa.o s .mHe>ueucH eEHu ceumowocu ecu you Doom no Doom necufle ou cemomxe mes .o.m mm .ueumco eumueom 2 H.o cu =emeuewmcmuuocmmosm ceumuucm= esa .muu>fluoe OHE>Nce co meucumuemaeu nous ou eucmomxe mo uoeMMMII.N mqmda 31 activity was noted after the first six minutes of exposure. After this same time, 63% of the hydrolytic activity was detected. Even after 30 minutes of exposure, 35% of the hydrolytic activity was retained. The inactivation of phosphotransferase activity was studied further in order to determine more accurately the time course of transferase inactivation at 60°C. It was also desirable to know if cytidine, the nucleoside acceptor, could protect the phosphotransferase activity from the denaturation caused by high temperature. The transferase activity showed a slight activation during the first two minutes of exposure at 60°C (Table 3). This activation was followed by a precipitous drOp in activity, complete inactivation being obtained between four and five minutes of incubation. When cytidine (l umole/0.l ml) was added to the enzyme during the incubation period, no activation of enzyme activity was detected. Also, cytidine, far from protecting the transferase activity, seemed to increase the rate of heat inactivation. Collectively, these results indicated that the phosphotransferase activity was significantly more heat labile than the hydrolytic activity. Effects of Monovalent and Divalent CatiOns Since enzymes may have a specific metal ion requirement, it was thought that studies on the effect of 32 TABLE 3.--Effect of cytidine on the activity of phosphotrans- ferase exposed at 60°C. Conditions were as given in Table 2 except that cytidine (1 umole/0.l m1), when used, was added to the enzyme preparation before exposing it to the elevated temperature. . Relative Activitya Exposure Time (minutes) Control + Cytidine 0 100 100 1 116 88 2 121 80 3 40 17 4 8 l7 5 0 7 6 0 0 aThe relative activity is based on the absolute value for CMP production per hour at zero exposure time (relative activity = 100). For this experiment this value was 57 mumoles CMP produced per hour for the control and 54 mumoles CMP produced per hour when the preparation was exposed at 60°C in the presence of cytidine. 33 various monovalent and divalent cations might give some indication as to whether or not the same site was involved in the transferase and phosphatase activities. Table 4 summarizes the results of experiments in which different salts were added to the standard assays for phospho- transferase and phosphomonoesterase activities. All salts were added in the chloride form to give a final concentra- tion of 3.3 X 10-4 M. Monovalent ions increased both phosphotransferase and phosphomonoesterase activities. No differences in the effect of these ions were noted for the transferase activity. All were equally capable of stimulating transferase activity, giving a 23% increase in rate. However, the hydrolytic activity was increasingly stimulated by the different ions in the order Na+ > K+ > NH4+. Both hydrolytic and transferase activities were stimulated most by Mgz+. Both activities were equally enhanced by Ca2+ and C02+. Mn2+ enhanced phosphomono- esterase activity, but it inhibited the transferase .reaction by 43%. Zn2+ also inhibited the transferase activity; it had little or no effect on phosphomonoesterase. Inhibition by EDTA and NaF Since the experiments summarized in Table 4 indicated a possible requirement for a metal ion by both transferase and hydrolytic activities, it was considered 34 TABLE 4.--Effect of various cations on enzymic activity. All salts were prepared in the chloride form and the final concentration used in the reaction mixture was 3.3 X 10'4M. Relative Activitya Cation Added Phosphomonoesterase Phosphotransferase None 100 100 Monovalent Cations NH4+2 136 ° 123 K+ 143 123 Na+ 175 123 Divalent Cations Ca2+ 153 152 c62+ 156 152 Mgz+ 219 247 an+ 169 57 an+ 105 29 aRelative activity is expressed in relation to the pNP produced per hour (0.37 umoles) or to the amount of CMP produced per hour (15 mumoles) in the absence of added salts (relative activity = 100). that wonl cent phos Pho: the inj occ tra con. of 1 inhi 35 that substances which interfere with metal-enzyme complexes would inhibit both enzymatic reactions. Figure 7 illustrates the effect of variable con- centrations of EDTA, a metal chelating agent, on both phosphotransferase and phosphomonoesterase activities. Phosphotransferase activity was inhibited very rapidly as the concentration of EDTA was increased. NO activity was present at a concentration of 6.6 X 10-5 M EDTA. At this same concentration, 68% of the original phosphomonoesterase was retained. Even at the highest concentration of EDTA tested (3.3 x 10‘? M), 7% of the phOSphomonoesterase activity was retained. Phosphomonoesterase activity was slightly inhibited by NaF (Figure 8). Maximum inhibition (37%) occurred at a concentration of 2 X 10-4 M. Phospho- transferase was slightly enhanced by about 20% up to a F- concentration of 1.53 X 10.4 M. Higher concentrations of F- resulted in transferase inhibition. Maximum inhibition of 20% was obtained at a F- concentration of 3.3 X 10‘4 M. This then, is the first instance in these studies in which phosphomonoesterase activity was more sensitive to inhibition than the transferase activity. Effect of Denaturing Agents The rationale for the experiment in this section is as follows. Different enzymes at the same temperature, pH, and ionic strength may be expected to behave differently 36 R/ R0 .9 _.| 0.2 .. T O 1 4 ; n [HM—- 0.0 0.4 0.8 1.2 126 2.0 2.4 2.8 3.2 2) Concentration of EDTA (M x 10" Figure 7. Effect of‘ EDTA concentration on enzyme activity. Assays for transferase (C1) and phosphatase (0) were Conducted as described in the standard procedure except that an appropriate aliquot of a 10‘3 M EDTA solution prepared in 0 - 10 M aCetate, pH 5.0, was addedto thereaction mixture t<3 give the final concentrations of EDTA indicated in the figure. The points used to prepare the curves represent the averages obtained from three separate experiments. The vertical lines indicate the 1: standard deviation o1:>'I::.ained for each sample.‘ 37 J l 4 1 n L A 1 l 7 0:4 0.8 1.2 1.6 220 224 2T8 3f2‘ 3Z6 Concentration of NaF (M x 10—2) Flgure 8. Effect of sodium fluoride on enzyme activity. e experiment was conducted as described in. Figure 7 except that a 10'3 M NaF solution prepared in. 0.10 M acetate was “sad. Phosphotransferase (D); phosphatase (0). Each point represents the average frOm three, separate experiments. Standard deViations are indicated by the vertical lines. 38 when subjected to an increasing concentration of a denaturing agent since they are likely to be denatured at different rates. Effect of HqC12.--The behavior of the transferase and hydrolytic activities was determined in the presence of increasing concentrations of HgCl2 (Figure 9). It should be noted that for this experiment hydrolytic activity was determined by the release of Pi since the addition of alkali for the determination of pNP caused the formation of a yellow precipitate. Although the parallelism in the loss of activities might suggest that an enzyme possessing both transferase and hydrolytic activities was being inhibited, an equally valid possibility is that the inhibition was generalized denaturation and therefore the results are equivocal. Inactivation by Urea.--The two activities also showed only slight differences in sensitivity to urea (Figure 10). A slight activation for both hydrolytic and transferase activities was observed at low urea concentra- tion. As the concentration was increased, a gradual loss of activity in both reactions occurred at approximately the same rate. This suggested that both activities are about equally sensitive to urea. Effect of Organic Solvents.--Phosphotransferase activity'was very sensitive to the presence of organic solvents (Figure 11) . Alcohols were potent inhibitors, R/Ro 39 1.01 0.81- 0.6 0.4. 0.2., ~43\\\\\\fl3 : e 1 : 4 :‘_{}:_ ETC 5 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6 2.0 2.4 2.8 3.2 3.6 Concentration of HgC12 (M x 104) Figure 9. Effect of HgCl concentration on phospho- transferase and phosphomonoesterase activities. Transferase activity (E!) was determined by the standard assay. Hydrolytic activity was assayed by determining the amount of Pi released from pNPP (CD). Concentrations of HgCl indicated in the figure were obtained by the additign of an appropriate aliquot of a solution of 10'3M HgCl prepared in 0.10 M acetate, pH 5.0, to the rea tion mixture. Similar results were obtained in two additional experiments. R/Ro 40 0.2 I : e 0 1 2 Molar Concentration of Urea Figure 10. Activation and inactivation of enzyme activity by urea. The molar concentration of urea indicated in the figure was obtained by the addition of an apprOpriate aliquot of an 8 M urea solution pre- ‘pared in 0.10 M acetate, pH 5.0, to the reaction Inixture. The extent of the transferase (C3) and hydrolytic activities (0) was determined by the standard procedures. Similar results were obtained in 'two additional experiments. R/Ro R/Ro 41 2 5 A Butyl Alcohol B Methyl Alcohol 2.04, 1.5 . 1.0. 1 0.5V 2.5 _ C Acetone A D Ethylene Glycol 5 15 25 35 % Organic Solvent in Reaction Mixture Figure 11. Effect of alcohols and acetone on enzyme activity. The organic solvent was added to the enzyme and both were kept on ice for 10 minutes before the. addition of substrate to start the reaction. Similar results were obtained in two additional experiments. 42 for example, butyl alcohol at 3.3% caused 100% inactivation of the transferase reaction (Figure 11A). Phosphomonoester- ase activity behaved markedly different. This activity was significantly stimulated by the organic solvents tested. In a concentration of 6.7% butyl alcohol, for example, hydrolytic activity was increased by 96%. On the other hand, transferase activity was activated by ethylene glycol much more than phosphatase at a low con- centration of the glycol (Figure 11D). Kinetic Studies of Phosphotransferase and’Phosphomonoesterase Activities If the two activities are present at a single site on the enzyme, then the Michaelis constant (Km) for the phosphate donor in the transferase reaction and the hydrolytic reaction would be expected to be the same. If different enzymes or different sites are involved, then the Km values for each activity might be different. Thus, investigations were conducted to determine the Michaelis constants for the two activities. A Michaelis-Menten plot (30) for phosphotrans- ferase activity with cytidine as the acceptor yielded the (mxrve shown in Figure 12. The sigmoidal shape of the cnxrve is characteristic of so-called "allosteric" enzymes which possess multiple cooperative binding sites (31) . Kinetics of this nature could be explained on the basis of time subunit model described by Monod et a1. (32). Because 43 mu moles CMP/hr 100- / l 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 [pNPP] M x 103 Figure 12. Effect of increasing amounts of phosphate donor substrate on the velocity of phosphotransferase. Variable amounts of pNPP were used as the_donor substrate in this study, otherwise all other conditions were as described in the standard procedure for the. transferase assay. 44 of the nature of the concepts inherent in the model pro- posed by Monod et al. and since the findings of many of the experiments to be presented presently could be based on the model, it seems appropriate to state the basic tenents: (l) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) Allosteric proteins are oligomers the protomers of which are associated in such a way that they all occupy equivalent positions. This implies that the molecule possesses at least one axis of symmetry. To each ligand able to form a stereospecific complex with the protein there corresponds one, and only one, site on each protomer. In other words, the symmetry of each set of stereo- specific receptors is the same as the symmetry of the molecule. The conformation of each protomer is constrained by its association with the other protomers. Two (at least two) states are reversibly accessible to allosteric oligomers. These states differ by the distribution and/or energy of inter-protomer bonds, and therefore also by the conformational constraints imposed upon the protomers. As a result, the affinity of one (or several) of the stereospecific sites toward the correspond- ing ligand is altered when a transition occurs from one to the other state. When the protein goes from one state to another state, its molecular symmetry (including the symmetry of the conformational constraints imposed upon each protomer) is conserved. A great deal of the rest of this thesis then, especially this section on kinetics, will be concerned with the possibility that phosphotransferase and phosphomono- esterase are polymeric. It is evident that if this is true then the task of purifying and characterizing the enzymes is increased . 45 The polymeric nature of enzymes has been shown, in general, by demonstrating that they can be made to associate or dissociate into subunits (the lowest level of organization) or monomers (the level of organization below oligomers). The interaction of substrates with enzymes which possess multiple cooperative binding sites is usually assessed by noting the kinetic behavior of the enzyme in the presence of substances known to cause association or dissociation of proteins. Thus it was decided to look at the transferase kinetics in the presence of salts which have opposing effects on the polymeric structure of proteins. Robinson and Jencks (33) studied the effects of various salts on the solubility of acetyltetraglycine ethyl ester (ATGEE), a model for peptide and amide groups in protein. The results of this work, and that of Nagy and Jencks (34) showed that the salts tested could be placed in a series depending on their effects by three criteria: (a) the effect on the solubility of ATGEE; (b) inhibition of protein denaturation; and (c) promotion of polymerization of F-actin. It was found, for example, that CH3COO-, the anion used to prepare the buffer in the present studies, effected an increase in the activity coefficient of ATGEE (salt out) and favored the poly- merization of F-actin. However, ClO4- caused an increase in the solubility of ATGEE (salt in) and depolymerized 46 F-actin. CH3COO- thus acts as an associating anion, i.e., favors polymerization of protomers and 0104- acts as a dissociating anion which favors the dissociation of an oligomer into its constituent protomers. Accordingly, the transferase kinetics as a function of increasing donor concentration were studied with CH3COO- treated and with C104- treated samples. Since, with unlabelled cytidine as the acceptor, it could be argued that the lag detected at low donor sub- strate concentration was caused by the formation of quantities of nucleotide too small to detect, 3H-uridine was used in these studies to improve the sensitivity of detecting small quantities of product. As shown in Figure 13, the sigmoidal shape of the v vs. [S] plots was realized both in CH3COO- and C104- treated samples. However, in C104- treated samples, the sigmoidicity of the curve was more pronounced. This fact was confirmed by double reciprocal plots (35) wherein the curved line determined from the data of samples treated with C104- was significantly more concave upward than the curve obtained for the CH3COO- treated samples (Figure 14). In instances when non-Michaelian kinetics such as that given in Figure 14 is obtained, it has become common practice to subject the data to Hill plots (36) in attempts to describe the system more fully. Wyman (37) has referred to the slope of this plot (n) as an interaction CPM 3HUMP x 102/hr 47 50 . O 40 "' /. C 30 x I C 20 I 10 , I I O O i z 5 I g 6 i ‘5 [pNPP] M x 103 Figure 13. Velocity of phosphotransferase as‘a function of phosphate donor concentration obtained for acetate and perchlorate treated samples. Separate enzyme prepara— tions were dialyzed overnight (4°C) against either 0.1'M acetate buffer (pH 5.0) or against the same acetate buffer containing 0.05 M NaC104. —The reaction mixture consisted of: 19 pg Protein; 20 u moles acetatg buffer, pH 5.0; variable concentrations of pNPP and H-uridine (80,000 cpm) as the acceptor. When NaClO was present in the reaction mixture it was used at a concentration of .05 M. The velocity is expressed as cmp incorporated into H-UMP; determined as deScribed in Materials and Methods. CH3C00' treated (0); C104" treated (O). x 103 C PM 300 " 48 l l l l A I v v T v t 2 4 6 8 10 12 l4 16 18 20 l [pNPP]- (M’1 x 10‘ Figure 14. Double reciprocal plot for pNPP in the phos- photransferase reaction. This plot was prepared from the data given in Figure 13. CH3C00 treated ([3); treated, with 0 .05 M C10 ' (O). 4 49 coefficient. An increase in the value of n away from unity is taken as an indication of an increased interaction between substrate-binding sites whereas a decrease in n is taken as a weakening of the interaction between the binding sites. Hill plots prepared from the data in Figure 14 showed a change in lepe as the concentration of donor was increased (Figure 15). This change occurred at a concentration of pNPP of approximately 1.93 X 10"4 M in both the CH3COO- and C104_ treated samples. However, the Hill coefficients (n) were different. In the CH3COO- treated samples the Hill coefficient increased from 1.10 to 1.55 while, in the C104- treated samples, n increased from 1.2 to a value of 2.30. The nonlinearity of the reciprocal plots and Hill coefficients of greater than one suggested the possibility for increased interaction of multiple donor sites (perhaps 2) in the transferase reaction. This interaction was substantially strengthened by treatment with C104-. When the concentration range of variable donor phosphate utilized was higher than that noted above, the sigmoidicity of the Michaelis—Menten plot was not observed either in the C104- treated or CH3COO- treated samples. A double reciprocal plot under these conditions was best approximated by a straight line. Figure 16 shows a typical plot produced with high concentrations of pNPP in the absence of C104 from which an apparent Km of 3.1 t 0.3 mM was obtained. 50 0.8.. 1 004‘ 0.2“ log Vm-V -O.& I .100“‘ -5 -4 -3 log [pNPP] Figure 15. Hill plots of the phosphotransferase reaction. These plots were prepared from the data given in Figure 13. Data is plotted as log [v/Vm-V] as a function of log [pNPP] . Hill coefficients obtained for the CH COO (E1) and C104- (€>) treated samples are indicated in the figure. 51 . _ Y»"‘.« .01 sun—nun.- my cpM'l x 103 A T— 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 _1 q- - 1 -2 1(M- x10) [pNPP]- Figure 16. Reciprocal plots of phosphotransferase at high pNPP concentrations. Conditions were as described in IPigure 13 except that higher variable concentrations of pNPP were used. 52 Michaelis-Menten plots (Figure 17) for hydrolytic activity did not show a sigmoidal relationship over the same range of phosphate ester concentrations used in the transferase studies. A Michaelis constant of 2.4 i 0.5 mM was determined from double reciprocal plots of the data (Figure 18). When uridine (1-2 umoles) was present during the determinations, the initial velocity was decreased (Figure 17). Double reciprocal plots indicated that the uridine probably acted as a non-competitive inhibitor of the hydrolytic reaction since the Km was not affected but the V max was decreased (Figure 18). Tha apparent difference in the Michaelis constants obtained for transferase and hydrolytic activities sug- gested that a simple one donor site—one acceptor site model for both reactions could not be invoked. It is possible that different enzymes or perhaps separate donor sites in the same enzyme are responsible for each activity. Sedimentation in Sucrose Density Gradients An enzyme will sediment in a sucrose gradient subjected to a centrifugal field at a rate which is primarily dependent on its molecular Size. It is possible, then, to separate a mixture of enzymes of different molecular sizes by this technique. V (mu moles pNP/hr) 53 500 L T 4oo«L 300. 200" A A 100T %”’r l r l 2 [pNPP] (M x 103) Figure 1?. Kinetic pattern of pNPP saturation in the phosphomonoesterase reaction. Conditions were the same as indicated in Figure 13. The velocity was determined in the absence ((3) and presence of non- labelled uridine. l u mole uridine in reaction mixture (0); 2 p moles uridine in reaction mixture (A) . 54 201 18 16.. 14 4» . 12-. 100 l/V x 103 4 4» /. A 91 1 2 3 1 1 -3 [pNPP]- (M' x 10‘ ) Figure 18. Reciprocal plot for pNPP in the phosphOb monoesteraSe reaction. The plot was prepared from the data obtained in Figure 17. No added nucleoside (o ); 1 14 mole uridine added (Q); 2 11 moles uridine added (A) . 55 Consequently, if two different activities are associated with the same enzyme, they should sediment to the same location in the sucrose gradient upon centrifuga- tion. If they are associated with differnt enzymes, they probably would not sediment together since their location in the gradient would depend on the molecular size of the different enzymes responsible for each activity. Figure 19 gives examples of sedimentation profiles obtained for "Purified Phosphotransferase" preparations centrifuged in sucrose density gradients buffered at various pH values in 0.1 M acetate. In no case could absolute and unequivocal separation of transferase and hydrolytic activities be achieved. At pH 5.0 both activities migrated as broad bands that were not entirely superimposable. Upon lowering the pH to 4.5, each activity was resolved into two or more bands and the apparent rates of sedimentation were slower. At the still lower pH of 3.0 transferase activity was resolved into two nearly symmetrical peaks. The sedimentation rate of the slower sedimenting band was even less than that noted at pH 4.5. Likewise, the phosphomonoesterases sedimented at slower rates; several bands which overlapped but were not congruent with the transferase bands were present. Perhaps the most significant finding here was the demonstration of the appearance of two distinct bands of mu moles pNP/hr 56 , 2:7 A | 220 4. ‘ pH 5.0 i O x +5033 180. . I \\\.180 . I 8% 1’ l ' o T'40E§Ch 140.. I I mm140 2;”. I 100" . 1:100' ' s s 4- __20 l I 60.. | 60. .. . 4.10 20.. I - ' ' 2o .. e g . 1 £>lgg 1 2 Volume in ml Volume in ml 100.. l C pH 3.0 100 “ 80.. < 8° .2 a a m 60.. 60 5 .3? a: g 40.. 40 '3 1 E a n 201. . 20 E Volume in m1 Figure 19. Ultracentrifugation pattern of enzyme activities as a function of pH.- "Purified Preparation" was exposed to 0.10 M acetate buffered at either pH 3.0, 4.5, or 5.0 for three hours at 4°C. It was then layered (121 ug protein) onto sucrose gradients (5-20%) prepared with the acetate buffer at the same pH to which it had been previously exposed. The gradientS‘were cen- trifuged at 38,000 rpm for 31 hours at 2°C. The fractions collected were diluted with 1 ml of 0.10 M acetate buffer, pH 5.0 and assayed for transferase (E3) or phosphatase activity (CD). The figure shows the sedimentation profiles obtained for both activities when contrifugation was carried out at pH 5.0 (A), pH 4.5 (B) and pH 3.0 (C). mu moles CMP/hr 57 slower sedimenting transferase activity in response to a lowering of the pH. From an examination of the profiles it can be said that it is probable that some of the phosphatases do not have transferase activity. It is equally possible for the transferases to have hydrolytic activity associated with them. The shift to slower sedimenting forms in response to a lowering of the pH suggested that an oligomeric macromolecule, possibly possessing both transferase and hydrolytic activities, was dissociated into its con- stituent subunits. Various oligomeric enzymes, e.g., aldolase (38), are dissociated as the net charge on the oligomer is altered by a variation of the pH. Several denaturants have also been used to cause the dissociation of oligomeric enzymes (39). For example, Cottam eE_al. (40) made use of urea to dissociate pyruvate kinase (M.W. 237,000) into 4 subunits of molecular weight 57,200. Figure 20 shows the sedimentation profile obtained when "Purified Phosphotransferase" was centrifuged in the 1 presence of 3 M urea in a sucrose gradient buffered at pH 5.0. This profile resembled somewhat the sedimentation profile obtained in Figure 19C wherein centrifugation was carried out at low pH, indicating that urea can also cause the formation of slower sedimenting forms. It should be recalled that earlier only one major band for both 58 73.0 67.2 60.1.. N" ’ 1L60 50 .. .50 H s Q E H z 40 -- 4,40 U Q In 3 3 H 30 J. ..30 0 O E a :- :1 E E 20 ., 120 10 .- ”10 I I I I 1 Volume (ml) Figure 20. Effect'of urea on the sedimentation profiles of Phosphotransferase and phosphomonoesterase. The preparation "as exposed to 3 M urea for 2 hours at room temperature and then applied (121 pg protein) to a sucrose gradient (5-20%) buffered with 0.1 M acetate, pH 5.0 containing 3 M urea. C3gtitrrifugation was carried out at 38,000 rpm for 31 hours at 2 C. Fractions collected were diluted with lyml of acetate, PH 5.0 and then analyzed for enzyme activity. Phosphotrans- ferase ( D ) ; phosphomonoesterase ( o ) . 59 activities was obtained at pH 5.0 in the absence of urea (Figure 19A). The results suggested that both transferase and phosphomonoesterase activities could be associated with an oligomeric enzyme. This suggestion was derived from the fact that both a lowering of the pH from 5.0 in acetate buffer as well as the presence of 3 M urea at pH 5.0 in the gradients caused the appearance of slower sedimenting forms for both activities. It did not appear that these new forms represented the dissociation of the same oligomeric enzyme into lower orders of polymerization since congruence between the peaks for each activity was not observed. Additionally, the resolution of new phosphatase peaks not possessing transferase activity argued in favor of separate proteins for each reaction. However, evidence will now be presented which suggested that both activities may indeed be associated with the same enzyme. Evidence that Phosphotransferase Possesses Hydrolytic Activity As mentioned above, the occurrence of several transferase and hydrolytic activities sedimenting at different rates in the sucrose density gradients strongly suggested that both activities were associated with a dissociable oligomeric enzyme. The appearance of more than the expected number of slowly sedimenting forms, 60 however, offered the possibility that something other than dissociation was taking place. Perhaps random breakage of the molecule due to the low concentration of protein applied could account for some of the newly formed species, especially in the case of the hydrolytic activity. To circumvent this possibility, Sephadex G-200 columns were employed so that more protein could be used without suffering a great sacrifice in resolution. An example of the elution profile obtained from three separate experiments is shown in Figure 21. Three major bands of transferase activity (Bands I, II and III) were eluted from the column accompanied by superimposable bands of phOSphomonoesterase activity. Again, as in the sucrose gradients, other hydrolytic bands were resolved which were not associated with any transferase bands. An elution profile obtained for hydrolytic activity with CMP as substrate exactly paralleled the phosphomonoesterase profile obtained with pNPP. Thus, the enzyme responsible for the hydrolytic activity could act as a nucleotidase. The approximate molecular weight of bands I, II and III was determined from a plot of elution volume vs. the log of the molecular weight of the reference marker as indicated in Figure 22. The molecular weight obtained for each band is given in Table 5. The values obtained for the molecular weights raised the possibility that the transferases and 61 III .51 mp moles 240- ' .40 I II ’ o 0 H180" -30 .u € 0 ' fi n. I n. z 5 n‘ o a: .- - a: 3 H s - 2 2120.» . ..20 :1 I [J ’ E I I I C I 60- . ’ +10 I o . O I O a a 5-: . . .. ’ 10 20 30 Fraction Number Figure 21. Chromatography of "Purified Phosphotransferase" on a Sephadex G-200 column. "Purified Preparation" (14 mg protein in 2 ml 0.10 M acetate, pH 5.2) was applied to a Sephadex G-200 column (45 x 2 cm) and eluted with 0.1 M acetate, pH 5.2. A flow rate of approximately 10 ml per hour was-utilized and fractions of 4.0 ml were collected. Aliquots were withdrawn and assayed for transferase (C3) or hydrolytic activity (0). 62 O \ Blue Dextran \ \ + / Apoferritin Catalase Nunbmmflmmo l I .. Band I—e—o Band II —-9 Alkaline Phosphatase 10 Jr- 92F 3.. 7d:- Molecular Weight Hemoglobin Band III —0 51) 41- 3... 2.. Cytochrome-C lo : A n 1 : 1 1 I 1 n L J 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 Elution Volume (m1) Figure 22.~ Determination of molecular weights of Phospho- transferase by chromatography on Sephadex G-200. Standards of kn0wn molecular weight were eluted from the Sephadex cOlumn under the same conditions used for the "Purified Preparation". The elution volume (Ve) of each standard was determined as described in Materials and Methods.) The arrows shown in the figure indicate the molecular weight and elution volume determined for the transferase bands eluted from the column. 63 TABLE 5.--Approximate molecular weight of three phospho- transferase bands eluted from a Sephadex G-200 column. Band Molecular Weight i Std. Dev. I 2.0 x 105 i 0.45 x 105 II 1.0 x 105 r 0.23 x 105 III 5.3 x 104 t 1.20 x 104 corresponding phosphatases eluted from the column represented tetrameric, dimeric, and monomeric forms of the same enzyme. The basic subunit of the enzyme might be represented by Band III which has an apparent molecular weight of 5.3 X 104. Sucrose density gradient analysis of the "Purified Preparation" in which a larger amount of protein (3.0 mg) was used as well as a slightly higher pH (5.2) produced three or four forms of both phosphotransferase and at least as many forms of phosphomonoesterase activities (Figure 23). Hydrolytic bands and the apparent correspond- ing transferase band are designated by the same Roman numeral. Thus in Figure 23, four hydrolytic bands are depicted which are possibly associated with transferase activity. There was a definite correlation in the sedimentation rate for both activities in the fastest sedimenting bands thus suggesting that single proteins are responsible for both activities. The slower mp moles pNP/hr 64 II P 200 $ . ..50 180. I.P . ‘ 160 .L . ' if 40 ) I T IV P E 140 (+- . \ II P g; 1 Q U 120 a * ->30 m w '3 O o 100 .. E 2 II T 0 ‘ 80 Y I 0 0 <~20 I IV T 60 H) I ‘ I III T 40 it I I .. $10 20 . I I I ' I n q . .g s ,L L 4.. .'."5‘ 0.5 l 1.5 2.0 Volume in ml Figure 23. Ultracentrifugation pattern of "Purified Phosphotransferase" in sucrose gradients at pH 5.2 in 0.1 M acetate. "Purified Phosphotransferase" (3mg protein) was layered on sucrose gradients (5-20%) and centrifuged at 38,000 rpm for 34 hours at 2°C. Frac- tions were collected and assayed as described in Figure 19. Transferase ([3); phosphatase ((1). pk no mi1 COL rep men thi: eac} PhOs 65 sedimenting bands of transferase and phosphatase activity showed a very poor correspondence of sedimentation rates. Compare, for example, Bands II with Bands IV. Although a direct comparison between this run and those depicted in Figure 19 cannot be made since more protein was used and the time of centrifugation was slightly longer in the present study, nevertheless, it is likely that the slowest sedimenting bands in Figure 23 (Bands IV) may be identical to the slower sedimenting forms which appeared at low pH (Figure 19). Note that at pH 3.0, the transferase band and hydrolytic band also did not coincide. Apparently, there must be a certain minimum size at which both activities remain associated. Could it be possible that the 53,000 molecular weight form represents this minimum? If so, then the slower sedi- menting forms could result from the dissociation of this protomer (monomer) into two non-identical subunits each solely responsible for either hydrolytic or phosphotransferase activity. 8550 DISCUSSION It should be stated candidly at the outset of this discussion that the original objective of this study was not completely realized. This must be said in order to provide some perspective to the original goals and in order to assess the findings and their significances as .—F'-_‘ _\: ~ ' . well as to suggest possible studies in the future. It has been demonstrated here that the nucleoside phosphotransferase preparations obtained from carrot leaves possess phosphomonoesterase activity in all stages of purification. It has been suggested that both activities may be associated with the same protein(s). The behavior of the "Purified Phosphotransferase" prepara- tion under a number of experimental conditions provided support for this conclusion. The first suggestion that both activities may be associated with the same enzyme was obtained from attempts to separate the transferase activity from the hydrolytic activity on ion exchange columns. The fact that both activities apparently retained a similar charge distribu- tion over a wide range of elution conditions suggested the possibility that both activities might be the result of the same protein (Figures 1 and 2). Additional support was obtained when it was discovered that the activities 66 67 could not be separated either by molecular seive chromatography (Figure 21) or by centrifugation in sucrose density gradients (Figure 23), two techniques which discriminate proteins on the basis of differences in size. The concept of an enzyme possessing both phospho- transferase and hydrolytic activities is not unique. Georgatos (41), for example, has described a human placental alkaline phosphatase that had been purified 450 fold which exhibited phosphotransferase activity. 1 However, it should be noted that sufficient data were not given from which one could state unequivocally that the transferase and phosphatase activities did indeed reside on the same protein. In the present studies gel filtration on Sephadex G-200 columns (Figure 21) indicated the presence of multiple molecular forms of enzymes responsible for both activities. Molecular weight determinations (Table 5) indicated that these forms probably represented oligomeric and protomeric forms of the enzyme. It seems unlikely at this stage of purification that multiple forms of proteins possessing both transferase and hydrolytic activities could exhibit maximum activity in the same fractions unless the same enzymes are responsible for both reactions. Cursory examination of the sucrose gradients with hemoglobin as the reference standard indicated that the 68 molecular weight of the slowest sedimenting forms apparently did not exceed 50,000 (data not reported). Earlier in this thesis it was suggested that these smallest sedimenting forms for both activities may represent the dissociation of catalytically active, non-identical sub- units which, together, comprise the native enzyme. One subunit could be responsible for the hydrolytic function of the enzyme while the second, smaller subunit would contain the nucleoside phosphotransferase activity. The differences in various biochemical parameters noted in this study could then be explained on the basis of a dif- ference in the stability and the properties of each of these discrete subunits. Of course, it is just as likely that these forms represented the dissociation of subunits from totally different enzymes. The kinetic data for the transferase reaction showed a transition from Michaelis-Menten kinetics to sigmoidal kinetics as a function of pNPP concentration. Maximum transition was obtained with enzyme treated with NaClO4 (0.05 M) wherein the Hill coefficient (n) increased from 1.20 to 2.30 (Figure 15). According to the model preposed by Monod gt_31. (32), such an increase of the Hill coefficient argues in favor of an increased inter- action between multiple substrate sites, possibly two. This interaction could occur by association of subunits, by a conformational change of the protein molecule or by 69 both. However, since the claim has been made here that both activities might be associated with the same oligomeric enzyme, one would expect to obtain sigmoidal kinetics for the hydrolytic function of the enzyme as well. This was not the case as all double reciprocal plots made for hydrolytic activity were best approximated by straight lines. The possibility exists, then, that the multiple molecular forms eluted from the Sephadex G-200 column (Figure 21) were produced by the aggregation of an active form of the enzyme (M.W. 53,000) caused by the par- ticular conditions employed in the investigation. This does not detract from the fact that an enzyme possessing both activities was involved in the aggregation into polymeric forms. An equally valid possibility to explain the kinetics obtained for the phosphotransferase activity then is that it reflects a competition for the donor sub- strate between a hydrolytic "site" and a transfer "site" which is not expressed in the associated state. A precedent for a suggestion of two sites binding donor substrate for phosphotransferase enzyme exists. During the writing of this thesis, Brunngraber and Chargaff (42) published a paper in which evidence was given which suggested the presence of two hydrolytic sites binding pNPP’in the carrot root phosphotransferase. This sug- (gestion was based on two major lines of evidence: (a) rmntlinearity of double reciprocal plots in the hydrolysis r In.“ 70 of pNPP and ribose-S-phosphate, and (b) the presence of two ionizing groups in the free enzyme which could bind pNPP. The suggested model was composed of two hydrolytic sites and one acceptor site. "One hydrolytic (transfer) site and the acceptor (water) site remain in the same relation to each other as in the two-center model." It was also found that uridine, the acceptor nucleoside used in these studies, impeded the ". . . hydrolysis of the second hydrolytic center which is incapable of transfer" by acting as a possible non-competitive inhibitor of the hydrolytic reaction. In the present study, uridine was also found to non-competitively inhibit the phosphatase activity of the leaf preparation albeit to a very limited extent. As mentioned above, in the present investigations with the leaf preparation nonlinearity of double reciprocal plots for hydrolytic activity was not observed (Figure 18) suggesting that only one "site" (apparent Km = 2.4 I 0.5 mM) is responsible for the hydrolysis of pNPP. A second "site" (apparent Km = 3.1 i 0.3 mM) could then function in the nucleoside phosphotransferase reaction. It is not positively known if this transferase site can also catalyze the hydrolase reaction. The kinetic data and sucrose density profiles obtained at low pH (Figure 19) and in the presence of urea (Figure 20) would suggest that it does not. Additionally, experiments in which organic 71 solvents were added to the reaction mixture (Figure llA-D) also suggested that, even if both activities reside on the same protein, there may be different transferring and hydrolytic "sites." An alternative explanation would be that the alcohols themselves are competing with the nucleo- side in the case of the transferase reaction. This would not, however, explain the action of acetone on the two activities (Figure 11C). In the present investigation, no attempt was made to ascertain the number and kinds of acceptor sites. It is suggested, however, that separate sites for water and the nucleoside acceptor may exist if two non-identical subunits described above do indeed comprise the native enzyme. Thus, one donor site (hydrolytic) and a water site would be found on one subunit. The second smaller subunit would contain the second donor site (transferase) and a nucleoside acceptor site. More evidence, especially in regard to the acceptor sites, is needed to firmly establish this hypothesis. Besides the difference in double reciprocal plots for the hydrolytic function, other differences were noted between the leaf preparation and the root preparation of Brunngraber and Chargaff. Thus, in addition to the dif- ference in pH Optima previously described, no sigmoidicity xmas observed in the kinetics of the transferase function. It is possible that too high a concentration of pNPP was 72 used in their studies so that sigmoidal kinetics was now obtained. It may be that one significant difference between the two preparations is that the root enzyme does not aggregate into large molecular weight forms, at least Brunngraber found no evidence that it did. Could it be possible that the carrot has "selectively" chosen to produce an oligomeric phosphotransferase-phosphomonoesterase @- enzyme in the leaf wherein many organic phosphate esters E are produced in the process of photosynthesis? At present, ; it cannot be said with any real degree of certainty that the enzymes are not the same since somewhat different con- ditions have been utilized in obtaining each preparation. However, this is an intriguing possibility and further investigations in an attempt to answer this question are certainly warranted. In summary, the most significant findings of this part of the thesis are: 1. The nucleoside phosphotransferase and phosphomonoesterase activities prepared from carrot leaves could not be separated by physical and chemical procedures utilized. 2. Multiple molecular forms of enzymes possessing both activities were detected by elution from a Sephadex G-200 column and by sedimentation in sucrose density gradients. 73 3. Both activities could be dissociated into non- identical slower sedimenting forms in sucrose density gradients at pH < 5 and in the presence of urea (3 M). The molecular weights of these slower sedimenting forms were probably less than 50,000. 4. Transferase activity differed greatly from phosphatase activity in sensitivity to heat, to denaturants, to inhibitors and stimulators and to pH. 5. Kinetic data indicated the possible presence of two sites binding pNPP in the transferase reaction; only one site binding pNPP was detected in the phosphatase reaction. In addition, uridine acted as a possible non- competetive inhibitor of the hydrolytic reaction. The possibility that an enzyme possessing both activities on different dissociable subunits must be considered. In view of the findings described herein, it is probable that the original objective of this section of the thesis was set prematurely owing to the possibility Of multiple forms of the enzyme(s). It is also possible that even the purest preparation used was not as pure as it was thought to be. Certainly, several additional purification steps, such as the technique of isoelectric focusing, could be included in future purification schemes. Additionally, in further attempts to purify the phospho- transferase from the leaf care should be taken to utilize 74 conditions under which the enzyme will remain primarily in one form. A more complete study should also be made to determine if, indeed, both activities are associated with an identical oligomeric protein(s) . SECTION II CYCLIC NUCLEOTIDE PHOSPHODIESTERASE 75 INTRODUCTION The role of 3',5'-cyclic adenosine monOphosphate (CAMP) as an intracellular second messenger was first established in liver glycogenolysis by Rall 3:31. (43). Since then this compound has been shown to act as a mediator for a number of animal hormones and to influence a wide variety of cellular processes in many different tissues and organs (44). The level of cAMP in the cell is maintained by at least two enzymes. Adenyl cyclase (45) catalyzes the formation of the cyclic nucleotide from ATP. A phosphodiesterase hydrolyzes the cyclic nucleotide to the monoester (46). Since this enzyme has been found to be more widely distributed in cells than adenyl cyclase, more work has been documented for the PhOSphodiesterase. Sutherland and Rall (46) provided the first indication that cAMP could be inactivated. The enzyme was demonstrated to be present in beef heart and the Product was shown to be 5'—adenosine monophosphate (5"AMP). Butcher and Sutherland (44) emphasized the overall distribution of the cyclic nucleotide phophodi~ e$terase in various tissues of the dog where the action Of CAMP has been documented. The properties of various PhOSphodiesterases have been described; the enzyme from 76 77 beef heart by Butcher and Sutherland (47) , from dog heart by Nair (48) , from rat brain by Cheung (49) and Cheung and Sulganicoff (50) from rabbit brain by Drummond and Perrot-Yee (51) and from rat liver by Menahan _e_1_:__a__l_. (52). A phosphodiesterase has been described from at least one unicellular organism; Chang (53) characterized a diesterase produced by the slime mold Dictyostelium discoideum which apparently acts as an acrasinase (54) since it destroys the chemical substance (acrasin) which causes aggregation of the motile, unicellular amoebae thereby producing small multicellular fruiting bodies. This substance has been shown by Konijn _e_t__a_l_. (55) and Konijn _e_t__a_l_. (56) to be 3' ,5'-cAMP. In general, the phosphodiesterases isolated from most animal sources have a dependency on added Mgz+ for maximal activity, are stimulated by imidazole and are inhibited by methyl xanthines. Additionally, Honda and Imamura (57) have shown that partially purified phosphodi- esterases from beef heart and rabbit brain cortex are inhibited by phenothiazine and reserpine derivatives. MiChaelis constants with cAMP as substrate vary from approximately 0.10 to 0.60 mM. Recently, Cheung (58) indicated the presence of an activator for the phosphodi- eSterase from a crude homogenate of bovine brain cerebra. The activator was shown to be a protein of molecular weight 0f about 40,000. The enzyme isolated from Dictyostelium is apparently different from the animal enzymes since it 78 is not inhibited by caffeine. It also exhibits a somewhat larger Km (2 mM) with cAMP as substrate. There are no reports, to my knowledge, concerning phOSphodiesterases from higher plants which hydrolyze 3',5' cyclic phosphate esters. As a result of the recent demonstration of the effect of gibberellic acid on the conversion of adenine-8-C into camp in barley aleurone layers by Pollard (59), it seemed that such an investigation was desirable. Certainly, if cAMP acts as a second mes- senger in higher plants for one or more of the plant hormones one would expect to find a mechanism for its inactivation. Since the crude preparation prepared during investigation of the nucleoside phosphotransferase Vvas known to be very rich in phosphatase activity, it was (decided to search for the enzyme in this preparation. It 61150 seemed desirable to determine the kinds of organic E>hosphate esters that could be hydrolyzed by the crude Eireparation. The investigations reported in this section <>f the thesis, then, have a two-fold objective: (a) to investigate the Specificity of the crude preparation 'tCNMard phosphate esters, since non-specific phosphatases aJfie potentially useful in the identification of phosphate esrters and (b) to make a cursory examination of the IPIRDperties of 3',5' cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterase, arI enzyme that appears to occupy a central role in 79 Iregulating hormonal action in higher organisms and which luas not been documented to occur in higher plants. MATERIALS AND METHODS Enzyme Source The crude preparation described in Section I was used in all studies. It was dialyzed for four hours against two liters of cold distilled water (4°C) before use. Chemicals Cyclic nucleotides were purchased from Sigma Chennical Company, St. Louis, Missouri and were used Witflnout further purification. Other chemicals and reagents were of the highest purity available and were also used without further purification. Enzyme Assays When substrates other than cyclic nucleotides Werfle used the reaction mixture consisted of the following: 2~5mg of protein, 1 umole of organic phosphate ester, 0-(31. umole MgCl and 30 umoles sodium acetate buffer, 2 PH 55.2, in a final volume of 0.61 ml. The reaction miIr‘tture was incubated at 45°C for thirty minutes and the reeuztion stOpped by boiling it for five minutes. The “darture was then cooled in ice and 0.10 ml of cold 5% trichloroacetic acid was added to insure complete 80 81 precipitation of protein. The tubes were centrifuged for five minutes with a clinical centrifuge set at 3/4 maximum speed. A 0.40 ml aliquot was withdrawn to which 0.20 ml of glass distilled water was added. The amount of phosphate in this mixture was assayed according to the method described by Ames (27) . Controls which were identical to the experimentals were run except that sub- strate was added immediately before boiling. All spectrOphotometric readings were made at 730 run against the control sample. Activity is expressed as mumoles phOSphate released per hour. One method that can be used to follow the action of phosphodiesterase upon cyclic nucleotide monophosphate (CNMP) was described by Butcher and Sutherland (47). The basis of the method is: CNMP Phosphodiesterasek NMP Nucleotidasem Pi + Nucleoside ' Tcommercial) ' The assay can be conducted with the source of Phosphodiesterase and the added commerical nucleotidase incubated together or it can be terminated at the NMP level and then carried to completion by the addition of the nucleotidase. Activity is measured by determining the Pi released by the nucleotidase. Preliminary studies showed that the crude prepara- tion contained very high levels of both 3'- and 5'- nucleotidase. Since the preparations released phosphate 82 from 3'- and 5'-AMP at 12-20 times the rate at which phOSphate was released from cAMP, and since there was no appreciable accumulation of the monOphosphates when the cyclic ester was used as a substrate, it was obvious that simply estimating phosphate release from the cyclic ester would be an effective assay for phosphodiesterase since this would be the rate-limiting reaction for 'phosphate release. Thus, the reaction mixture consisted (Df the following: 10 mg protein, 1 umole cNMP, 0.1 U Inole MgCl2 and 30 umoles of sodium acetate buffer of pH 5.2 in a final volume of 0.61 ml. The mixture was :incubated at 45°C for two hours, at which time the Jreaction was stOpped by boiling for 5 minutes. Phosphate Ireleased was measured as described above. Controls were rain and expression of activity is as described above for non- cNMP substrates . Since more than one enzyme is involved in the (atssay for the degradation of cyclic nucleotides, studies titzilizing cyclic nucleotide substrates will make reference tn: 'bhe phosphodiesterase system rather than the phosphodi- esterase enzyme since any treatments may affect one or more of the enzymes involved in the assay. Determination of Nucleotide Intermediate The reaction mixture used to determine the identity (If ruacleotide formed by the carrot diesterase consisted of the following: 0.10 mg protein, 0.01 Umole MgClz, l u 83 mole cAMP, 2 umoles fructose 1:6 diphosphate and 20 u moles sodium acetate buffer, pH 5.2, in a final volume of 0.41 ml. Individual tubes containing this mixture were incubated for 10, 20 or 40 minutes and were then boiled for 5 minutes to stOp the reaction. The tubes were then centrifuged for 10 minutes at 3/4 maximum speed in a clinical centrifuge. The supernatant solutions from all the tubes were combined and the entire mixture streaked con Whatman No. l chromatography paper which had been Ipreviously impregnated with 10% (NH4)ZSO4. Commercial :3amples of 5'-AMP, 3'-AMP, cAMP, adenine and adenosine vvere also applied to a second sheet of chromatography gpaper. The chromatograms were developed by ascending tzechnique with 75% ethanol and the UV absorbing areas lxocated with a UV light source. The UV absorbing areas <2cxrresponding to the standards were eluted from the paper and rechromatographed by thin layer technique on Silica ggeell GF plates (2.5 cm X 7.5 cm). The chromatograms were developed in a solvent system containing iSOprOpanol- nuetflaanol-NH4OH and water (10:1:5:2 by volume) along with cxbnunercial standards. The compounds were located as given above . Sucrose Density Gradients Density gradients were prepared as described earlier. Protein (15 mg) was layered on the gradients and Centrifugation was carried out at 30,500 rpm for 22 84 hours at 4°C. Fractions were collected as previously described and were diluted by the addition of 0.40 ml of 0.10 M acetate buffer pH 5.0. An aliquot of 0.01 ml of each fraction was incubated with an equal volume of acetate buffer containing either 3',5‘-cAMP or 2',3'- cAMP (both 1.5 mg/ml) for 10 hours at 37°C. The reaction Inas stOpped by the addition of 1.7 ml of the assay reagent tised for the determination of phosphate. The sedimentation xprofile is plotted as OD determined at 730 nm vs. the :fraction number. RESULTS Substrate Specificity of Crude Phosphotransferase The crude preparation. 'was shown to contain at lxeast several distinguishable enzymes that could hydrolyze pflNPP (Figure 1). Consequently, it was decided to determine time kinds of phosphate esters that could be hydrolyzed by 'tflis preparation. Since very few higher plant phosphatases xvigth high substrate specificity have been described, an easily obtainable crude preparation of known substrate Specificity may be valuable as a source of such enzymes. Afihflitionally such a preparation could prove of inestimable Value in the identification and proof of structure of newly-isolated phosphate compounds. The results summarized in Table 6 indicate that the crude preparation was capable of hydrolyzing a large nuunber of phosphate esters (all substrates tested were hYdrolyzed with the exception of Vitamin B12) , some con- 'taianing pyrophosphate bonds, to inorganic phOSphate. Of ‘najCIr significance was the observation that the phosphodi- estner linkage of Bis-pNPP could also be hydrolyzed to FUNDSphate. Since no literature on the hydrolysis of the Phosphodiester linkage of 3' ,5'-cyc1ic nucleotides by plant Preparations could be found, it was decided to determine if 85 86 TABLE 6.—-Relative apparent rates of hydrolysis of various organic phosphate esters by "Crude Phosphotransferase" from carrot leaves. Individual controls were run with each phosphate ester listed in the table. The values given are the averages for two separate experiments. Phosphate Ester Mumoles Pi/hr. Coenzyme A 2858 Deoxy-5'-Adenosine Diphosphate 2010 Pyridoxal Phosphate 1875 3—Phosphoglycerate 1670 Adenosine-S ' -Tetraphosphate 1608 Flavin Mononucleotide 1608 Fructose-1,6-Diphosphate 1320 NADP (TPN) 1252 Phosphoenolpyruvate 1250 Deoxy-5'-Guanidine Monophosphate 1195 Dihydroxyacetone Phosphate 1070 o—Phosphoethanolamine 1025 Thiamine Pyrophosphate 612 3 ' -Adenosine Monophosphate 585 Fructose-6-Phosphate 558 NAD (DPN) 535 Cytidine-2 ' , 5 ' -Diphosphate 508 2 ' -Adenosine MonOphosphate 492 Fruc tose-l-Phosphate 458 Flavin Adenine Dinucleotide 415 Rlbose-S-Phosphate 392 6‘fPhosphogluconate 362 Bl£3---p--Nitrophenylphosphate 342 GlLIcose—6-Phosphate 342 IE’henophthalein Diphosphate 302 5 ' ~Adenosine Monophosphate 258 Glyceraldehyde-3—Phosphate 128 G}Ucose-l-Phosphate 100 Vltamin B 0 12 87 'this preparation could act on this kind of substrate also. 'Table 7 lists, in decreasing order, the relative activity cobtained with different cyclic phosphate esters. All the <3yclic nucleotide substrates tried were successfully hydrolyzed by the preparation thus indicating that a system for the inactivation of cAMP and other 3',5'-cyclic nucleotides indeed exists in higher plants. The results from an investigation of the properties of this system from the carrot leaf preparation will now be given. Some Properties of the Cyclic Nucleotide Phosphodiesterase System from Carrot Leaves lime Course The release of phosphate from c dibutyryl AMP was ffiound to be essentially linear for the first hour of iancubation at 45°C (Figure 24). However, in order to Cibtain significant activity, a two hour incubation period Vvas generally used in these studies. During the second kuour the rate of phosphate release falls off only very S lightly . Efoect of Temperature Figure 25 shows the activity of the preparation tuawards cAMP as a function of increasing temperature. No apparent optimum temperature was obtained under the assay C30nditions used, even up to 55°C. It was concluded that time diesterase system could be studied at elevated 88 n.am Amzuoc mumcmmocmocofi wcwcaumo owaomo|.m..m m.mm Amadoc mumcmmosmocoa mcamococm oaaomou.m..m o.ma Amza Hmumusnflc 0c opwcmmocmocoe mnemococm Hmuxusnac oaaowon.m..m N.ov Amzaoc mpmcmmocmocofi mcacaemcu owaoaou.m..m 0.0m AmzHov ouwcmmocmocofi mnemocfi oHHomou.m..m uc\am mmH081z wcauomaosz oaaomu .mponumz com wamflumumz ca confluomwc mamsofl>mum muscoooum UHM©GMpm 0:» cu mcwcnooom coma mumB mcoaumcHEnoumo .mm>mmH uouumo Eoum emmmammmcmuuocmmocm mcunu: an mwumuvaSm ocfluomaosc oaaomo msoaum> mo mawwaoncmc mo mmumu uconmmmm 0>Humammll.h mqm<9 mu moles Pi/hr 89 O 50 -- 40 + O 30 -. O 20 -. 10 T 30 60 90 120 150 Time (minutes) Figure 24. Time course of the formation of Pi by the crude phosphodiesterase preparation. Reaction mixtures were pre- pared as described for the standard procedure. At the indicated time intervals, tubes were withdrawn and the con- tents assayed for Pi as in the standard procedure. The . 8:5‘3l1\11;18:.il.‘.rate employed for this investigation was dibutyrl c O 90 4O .. w O my moles Pi/hr ZO-A 10... 5 15 25 35 45 55 Temperature (°C) Figure 25. Phosphodiesterase activity as a function of increasing temperature. Enzyme and substrate (cAMP) were first exposed to the indicated temperatures for 5 minutes to insure that the. reaction was carried out at the desired temperature for the entire period of incubation. Substrate .was added to the enzyme to initiate thereaction after this pre-exposure Period. 91 temperature without fear of 1033 of activity. Thus, in most studies, an incubation temperature of 45°C was used so that a significant amount of phosphate could be released without resorting to prolonged periods of incu- bation. pH Optimum An examination of the hydrolysis of cAMP in acetate buffer of various pH values produced the results given in Figure 26. Unlike most animal phosphodiesterases, whose pH Optima lie on the alkaline side of neutrality, the carrot leaf phosphodiesterase system exhibited a pH flpo¢ m>aumamm usmaummua .mz¢0 Scum oomwmamu uncommonm mop wo soavmsflfinmumc on» How com: mums whommm osmosmum .oHMm ESHcOm muH Eosm omnmomnm mma um amuamm mpmuoum mnu Eoum omummmum muoz +mc2 com +mmz .m.m mm .mpmpmom 2 oa.o CH cmummmnm mumz muamm Has .mufl>fluom ommuopmmflcocmmozm so m can .+ch .+mmz mo powmwm:l.m mqmse 94 presence of F- (6.6 mM) had an inhibitory effect on the release of phosphate from cAMP. Identification of Reaction Products Evidence was obtained that 3'-AMP was the major .immediate product formed by the hydrolysis of cAMP. This vvas realized by paper chromatography of a reaction mixture :in which fructose 1:6 diphosphate (2 umoles) was included eat a relatively high concentration in order to "protect" tzhe nucleotide product from non-specific phosphomonoester- aase activity. Traces of 5'-AMP were also detected on the c:hromatograms. The product of the nucleotidase, in addition to Pi, was determined to be adenosine. Elution cxf these compounds from the chromatograms and rechromatog- rtiphy by thin layer technique showed them to be indis- tignguishable from the commercial compounds co- chromatographed with them. Corroboration of these results was obtained when FTHllard (personal communication) demonstrated that incanbation of l4C-cAMP with the preparation in the presence Of 'unlabelled 3'- and 5'-AMP gave rise to label in both morloesters . Sutherland and Rall (46) reported that 5'-AMP was the: only product formed from the hydrolysis of cAMP by the: partially purified beef heart preparation. The same iSOuner has been found to be produced by the diesterases 95 from other animal sources. In this respect, then, the higher plant enzyme is quite different from the enzymes found in animal tissue. Sucrose Density Gradient Analysis The sedimentation profile on sucrose gradients (of enzymes effecting release of Pi from 3',5'-cAMP showed ‘the presence of two major bands of activity (Figure 27). VVhen 2',3'-cAMP was used, at least three bands which llydrolyzed this substrate were determined to be present. A comparison of the two sedimentation profiles asuggested that different kinds of enzymes might be present inn the preparation which were capable of hydrolyzing the tnvo substrates. Thus, the fastest sedimenting band agqparently represented a non-specific enzyme which could h§ndrolyze both the 2',3'- and the 3',5'-phosphodiester linkages. However, the slower sedimenting band catalyzing thee hydrolysis of 3',5'-cAMP was not congruent with either Of‘ the two slower sedimenting forms that hydrolyzed 2. (3'-CAMPI Michaelis Constants The apparent Km for the leaf phosphodiesterase SYEVtem with 3',5'-cAMP as substrate was determined from a dfinllole reciprocal plot (35), as shown in Figure 28. A val—lie of 0.91 mM was calculated. This value is somewhat hiérller than most constants reported for the enzymes from 96 l ‘7 Fraction Number Figuxna 27. Ultracentrifugation patterns of phosphodiesterase aetififlity with 3',5'-cAMP and 2',3'-cAMP as substrate. Protein (15 Hug) was layered on sucrOSe gradients (5-20%) and centrié fugeéi at 30,500 rpm for 22 hours at 4 C. Fractions collected were assayed for activity toward'3' , 5-cAMP (o) and 2', 3 ‘CAHMP (t3). Assay conditions were as desoribed in Materials and Methods. 97 10.. 3.. E 6‘ O m 1‘ Q Q a 4. 1.45101 2 app.Km = 3.33mM O . : e : 1 2 3 4 5 [31-1 (m‘1 x 10‘3) Flgure 28. Comparison of theMichaelis constants for 3' nucleotidase and cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterase activities. variable concentrations of 3'-AMP, 2',3'-cAMP and 3',5'—cAMP were uSe‘d for thedetermination of Michaelis constants- Other than theconcentration of phosphate ester, all conditions were.as described in the standard procedures given for nOn- :KClic and cyclic substrates. Indicated in the figure are (De apparent K values calculated for3'-AMP (A), 2' ,3'-cAMP ) and 3',5'-CAMP (0). 98 aanimal sources but it is less than the 2 mM value given fkar the enzyme found in Dictyostelium (53). Michaelis constants were also determined for the Stibstrates 2',3'-cAMP and 3'-AMP. Values of 1.45 mM a11d.3.33 mM were obtained respectively. DISCUSSION It has been demonstrated here that the crude preparation from carrot leaves is capable of hydrolyzing a large number of phosphate esters to inorganic phosphate (Table 6). The only tested substrate that was resistant to hydrolysis was Vitamin B12. This is not unexpected since higher plants are known to be a poor source of this Vitamin. Consequently, this preparation may be of value in characterizing phosphate esters that are discovered in the future as it may be a crude source for certain enzymes that may be further purified for kinetic studies, mechanism of action, etc. The list of possible phosphate substrates is far from being complete, however, as the results in Table 6 indicate, besides catalyzing the hydrolysis of substrates containing a simple phosphate ester bond, the preparation can also hydrolyze phosphate compounds containing pyrophosphate bonds (e.g., Thiamine pYfOphosphate) as well as high energy phosphate esters of enols (e.g., phosphoenolpyruvate). In addition, the phC’sphodiester linkage found in Bis-pNPP (Table 6) and that Of cyclic nucleotide monophosphates (Table 7) were also hydrolyzed by enzymes present in the crude prepara- thn- It would be interesting to determine if other 99 100 kinds of phosphate esters, for example, oligonucleotides, can also be hydrolyzed by the preparation. The participation of 3',5'-cAMP in the hormonal control mechanisms of a number of animal systems has been firmly established (44). Only recently has the involve- ment of this compound in a hormonal system in higher plants been suggested. Thus, Pollard (59) has demonstrated that exogenously applied gibberellic acid (GA), a naturally occurring plant hormone, increases the amount of cAMP formed from adenine-8-14C in barley aleurone layers by as much as twice the amount formed in non-GA treated layers. This result would be expected if cAMP was indeed partici- Pating as a second messenger in response to the hormone, GA- Although the synthesis of cAMP was demonstrated, isolation of adenyl cyclase was not accomplished. A second piece of evidence supporting the involve- ment of CAMP in the aleurone layers was the fact that CAMP could mimic certain of the effects caused by GA on the synthesis and secretion of soluble sugar and other metabolites from the layers (60). The secretion of amYlase could also be effected by cAMP after amylase formation was induced by suboptimal concentrations of GA. If cAMP is active as a second messenger in higher plants, as the above studies would suggest, then a mechanism for CAMP degradation should be present. The results pre- sented in this study confirmed the fact that cAMP can be 101 enzymatically degraded by a preparation. from a higher plant source. The system studied actually hydrolyzed all 3 ' ,5'-cyclic nucleotide monophosphates tested (Table 7). Enzyme preparations from animal systems show a preference for cyclic nucleotides with a purine base (52). Additionally cyclic dibutyryl AMP has been found to be resistant to hydrolysis by phosphodiesterases prepared from various sources (44, 52). In the carrot preparation, however, cyclic dibutyryl AMP was actually hydrolyzed to a greater extent than cAMP. Apparently, the plant preparation possesses a lesser degree of specificity in regard to hydrolyzable substrates than the animal enzymes. The sedimentation profiles obtained from sucrose density gradients (Figure 27) suggest that both specific and non- specific phosphodiesterases may be present in the prepara- tion. It is not known if these enzymes involved in the degradation of cyclic nucleotides can also hydrolyze Other phosphodiester compounds. The preparation should be further purified so that the exact specificity of the enzyme can be determined and the assignment of a truly descriptive name for the enzyrne can be made. In the present study, an attempt was made to purify the diesterase by DEAF-cellulose column chromatography under the conditions used for phospho- trarlsferase purification (Figure 1). This resulted in Complete loss of phosphodiesterase activity even though 102 the nucleotidase activity (3' and 5') eluted in a broad enough band so that some nucleotidase activity was present in almost every fraction of the collected eluant. The properties of the preparation at the present stage of purification differed markedly from most prepara— tions obtained from other sources. Of major significance is the fact that 3'-AMP rather than 5'-AMP is apparently the major nucleotide product formed from cAMP degradation. However, some 5'-AMP was also observed to be formed during tfluadegradation of cAMP. It is not known if the same or different enzymes gave rise to the two mononucleotides .Another difference noted in the carrot preparation was the acidic pH optimum (Figure 26) as compared to the alkaline optimum noted for the enzyme from animal systems and the enzyme found in Dictyostelium (53). The apparent Km (Figure 28) determined for the carrot preparation was found to be an intermediate value when a comparison between the animal and fungal sources was made. In one respect, the carrot system behaved as other phosphodi- 2+ stimulates the degradation esterase systems in that Mg of cAMP (Table 8). In addition to the suggestions for further studies alluded to above, the following investigations are also worth pursuing: (a) distribution of the enzyme in the cell, i.e., particulate, soluble or both? and (b) isolation and purification of adenyl cyclase. L ITERA‘I‘URE C ITED 103 LITERATURE CITED 1. Brawerman, G., and E. Chargaff. 1953. Enzymatic phosphorylation of nucleosides by phosphate transfer. J. Amer. Chem. Soc. 75 : 2020-2021. 2. Brawerman, G., and E. Chargaff. 1953. Nucleotide synthesis by malt and prostate phosphatases. J. Amer. Chem. Soc. 75 : 4113. 3. Brawerman, G., and E. Chargaff. 1954. On the synthesis of nucleotides by nucleoside phospho- transferases. Biochem. Biophys. Acta. 15 . 4. Brawerman, G., and E. Chargaff. 1955. On the dis- tribution and biological significance of the nucleoside phosphotransferases. Biochem. Biophys. Acta 16 : 524-532. 5. {Punis, M., and E. Chargaff. 1957. Nonparticipation of inorganic phosphate in the enzymic formation of nucleotides by nucleoside phosphotransferases. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 69 : 295—299. 6- KEitagiri, H., H. Yamada, K. Mitsugi, and T. Tsunoda. 1964. Bacterial synthesis of nucleotides. Part I. Nucleoside phosphotransferase of Escherichia coli. Agr. Biol. Chem. 28 : 577-585. 7° ME11:sugi, K., K. Komagata, M. Takahashi, H. Iizuka, and H. Katagiri. 1964. Bacterial synthesis of nucleotides. Part II. Disrribution of nucleoside phosphotransferases in bacteria. Agr. Biol. Chem. 28 : 586-600. 8' Mitsugi, K. 1964. Bacterial synthesis of nucleotides. Part III. General prOperties of nucleoside phosphotransferase. Agr. Biol. Chem. 28 : 659-668. 9' Mitsugi, K. 1964. Bacterial synthesis of nucleotides. Part IV. Effects of inhibitors and metallic ions on the nucleoside phosphotransferase. Agr. Biol. Chem. 28 : 669-677. 104 105 lC). Mitsugi, K., E. Nakazawa, M. Takahashi, and H. Yamada. 1964. Bacterial synthesis of adenosine-5',2' (or 3')-diphosphate. Agr. Biol. Chem. 28 : 571- 572. 1L1. Mitsugi, K., A. Kamimura, E. Nakazawa, and S. Okumura. 1964. Bacterial synthesis of nucleotides. Part V. Acceptor specificity of nucleoside phospho- transferase (I): Phosphorylation of ribonucleo- sides. Agr. Biol. Chem. 28 : 828-837. 122. Mitsugi, K., E. Nakazawa, and S. Okumura. 1964. Bacterial synthesis of nucleotides. Part VI. Acceptor specificity of nucleoside phospho- transferase (II) : Phosphorylation of deoxyribo- nucleosides. Agr. Biol. Chem. 28 : 838-848. 123- Mitsugi, K., A. Kamimura, S. Okumura, and N. Katsuya. 1964. Bacterial synthesis of nucleotides. Part VII. Acceptor specificity of nucleoside phosphotransferase (III): Phosphorylation of unusual ribonucleosides and their ribosyl derivatives. Agr. Biol. Chem. 28 : 849-858. 14.. Mitsugi, K., E. Nakazawa, M. Takahasi, and H. Yamada. 1964. Bacterial synthesis of nucleotides. Part VIII. Acceptor specificity of nucleoside phosphotransferase (IV): Phosphorylation of adenylic acid. Agr. Biol. Chem. 28 : 859-868. 15. Imitsugi, J., E. Nakazawa, S. Okumura, M. Takahashi, and H. Yamada. 1965. Bacterial synthesis of nucleotides. Part IX. Phosphorylation of nucleoside monophosphates. Agr. Biol. Chem. 29 : 1051-1058. 16. Fhoberts, D. W. A. 1967. The wheat leaf phosphotases. VIII. A preparation with phosphotransferase activity. Can. J. Biochem. 45 : 401-408. 17. Ihanis, M., and E. Chargaff. 1960. Studies on the nucleoside phosphotransferase of carrot. I. Partial purification of the nucleoside phospho- transferase. Biochem. Biophys. Acta 37 : 257-266. 18. TPLLhiS, M., and E. Chargaff. 1960. Studies on the nucleoside phosphotransferase of carrot. II. Separation of transferase and phosphatase activities. Biochem. BiOphys. Acta 37 : 267-273. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. 27. 28. 106 Brunngraber, E. F., and E. Chargaff. 1967. Purifi- cation and prOperties of a nucleoside phospho- transferase from carrot. J. Biol. Chem. 242 4834-4840. Becker, V. E., and C. J. Pollard. 1969. The use of nucleoside phosphotransferase and (32P)p—nitropheny1 phosphate in the determination of the 5'-linked termini of ribosomal RNA. Plant Physiol. 44 : 978- 984. Becker, V. E. 1967. Studies on nucleic acids of plants. I. Deoxyribonucleic acid of plastids. II. The use of nucleoside phosphotransferase and (32P)p-nitropheny1 phosphate for the determination of 5'-linked termini of ribosomal ribonucleic acid. Ph.D. thesis, p. 103. Lane, B. G. 1963. The separation of adenosine, guanosine, and uridine by one—dimensional filter- paper chromatography. Biochem. BiOphys. Acta 72 : 110-112. Britten, R. J., and R. B. Roberts. 1960. High- resolution density gradient sedimentation analysis. Science 131 : 32-33. Lowry, O. H., N. J. Rosebrough, A. L. Farr, and R. J. Randall. 1951. Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent. J. Biol. Chem. 193 : 265-275. Warburg, 0., and W. Christian. 1942. Isolierung und Kristallisation des Garungsferments Enolase. Biochem. Zeit. 310 : 384-421. Bessey, O. A., O. H. Lowry, and M. J. Brock. 1946. A method for the rapid determination of alkaline phosphatase with five cubic millimeters of serum. J. Biol. Chem. 164 : 321-329. Ames, B. N. 1966. Assay of inorganic phosphate, total phosphate and phosphatases. In Methods in Enzymology. Vol. VIII. Edited by E. F. Neufeld and V. Ginsberg, pp. 115-118. Academic Press, New York. Martin, R. G., and B. N. Ames. 1961. A method for determining the sedimentation behavior of enzymes: Application to protein mixtures. J. Biol. Chem. 236 : 1372-1379. 29. 30. 31. 32. 33. 34. 35. 36. 37. 38. 39. 40. 107 Chance, B., and A. C. Maehly. 1955. Assay of catalases and peroxidases. In Methods in Enzymology. Vol. II. Edited by S. P. Colowick and N. 0. Kaplan, pp. 764-775. Academic Press, New York. Michaelis, L., and M. L. Menten. 1913. Die kinetik der invertinwirkung. Biochem. Zeit. 49 : 333-369. Monod, J., J. P. Changeux, and F. Jacob. 1963. Allosteric proteins and cellular control mechanisms. J. Mol. Biol. 6 : 306-329. Monod, J., J. wyman, and J. P. Changeux. 1965. On the nature of allosteric transitions: A plausible model. J. Mol. Biol. 12 : 88-118. Robinson, D. R., and W. P. Jencks. 1965. The effect of concentrated salt solutions on the activity coefficient of acetyltetraglycine ethyl ester. J. Amer. Chem. Soc. 87 : 2470—2479. Nagy, B., and W. P. Jencks. 1965. Depolymerization of F-actin by concentrated solutions of salts and denaturing agents. J. Amer. Chem. Soc. 87 : 2480-2488. Lineweaver, H., and D. Burk. 1934. The determination of enzyme dissociation constants. J. Amer. Chem. Soc. 56 : 658-666. Brown, W. E. L., and A. V. Hill. 1922-23. The oxygen- dissociation curve of blood, and its thermodynamical basis. Proc. Roy. Soc. B. 94 : 297-334. Wyman, J. 1963. Allosteric effects in hemoglobin. Cold Spr. Harb. Sym. Quant. Biol. 28 : 483-489. Deal, W. C., W. J. Rutter, and K. E. van Holde. 1963. Reversible dissociation of aldolase into unfolded subunits. Biochem. 2 : 246-251. Klotz, I. M., N. R. Langerman, and D. W. Darnall. 1970. Quaternary structure of proteins. Ann. Rev. Biochem. 39 : 25-62. Cottam, G. L., P. F. Hollenberg, and M. J. Coon. 1969. Subunit structure of rabbit muscle pyruvate kinase. J. Biol. Chem. 244 : 1481-1486. 41. 42. 43. 44. 45. 46. 47. 48. 49. 50. 108 Georgatos, J. G. 1967. Specificity and phospho- transferase activity of purified placental alkaline phosphatase. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 121 : 619-624. Brunngraber, E. F., and E. Chargaff. 1970. Nucleoside phosphotransferase from carrot. Kinetic studies and exploration of active sites. J. Biol. Chem. 245 : 4825-4831. Rall, T. W., E. W. Sutherland and J. Berthet. 1957. The relationship of epinephrine and glucagon to liver phosphorylase. IV. Effect of epinephrine and glucagon on the reactivation of phosphorylase in liver homogenates. J. Biol. Chem. 224 : 463-475. Robison, G. A., R. W. Butcher, and E. W. Sutherland. 1968. Cyclic AMP. Ann. Rev. Biochem. 37 : 149-174. Sutherland, E. W., T. W. Rall, and T. Menon. 1962. Adenyl cyclase. I. Distribution preparation and properties. J. Biol. Chem. 237 : 1220-1227. Sutherland, E. W., and T. W. Rall. 1958. Fraction- ation and characterization of a cyclic adenine ribonucleotide formed by tissue particles. J. Biol. Chem. 232 : 1077-1091 Butcher, R. W., and E. W. Sutherland. 1962. Adenosine 3',5'-ph03phate in biological materials. I. Purification and prOperties of cyclic 3',5'- nucleotide phosphodiesterase and use of this enzyme to characterize adenosine 3',5'-phosphate in human urine. J. Biol. Chem. 237 : 1244—1250. Nair, K. G. 1966. Purification and properties of 3'-5'-cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterase from dog heart. Biochem. 5 : 150—157. Cheung, W. Y. 1967. Properties of cyclic 3',5'- nucleotide phosphodiesterase from rat brain. Biochem. 6 : 1079-1087. Cheung, W. Y., and L. Salganicoff. 1967. Cyclic 3',5'-nucleotide phosphodiesterase: Localization and latent activity in rat brain. Nature 214 : 90-91. 109 EIrummond, G. I., and S. Perrott-Yee. 1961. Enzymatic hydrolysis of adenosine 3',5'-phosphoric acid. J. Biol. Chem. 236 : 1126-1129. Menahan, L. A., K. D. Hepp, and O. Wieland. 1969. Liver 3':5'-nuc1eotide phosphodiesterase and its activity in rat livers perfused with insulin. Eur. J. Biochem. 8 : 435-443. (Shang, Y. Y. 1968. Cyclic 3',5'-adenosine mono- phosphate phosphodiesterase produced by the slime mold Dictyostelium discoideum. Science 160 : 57-59. IBonner, J. T., D. S. Barkley, E. M. Hall, T. M. Konijn, J. W. Mason, G. O'Keefe, III, and P. B. Wolfe. 1969. Acrasin, acrasinase and the sensitivity to acrasin in Dictyostelium discoideum. Devel. Biol. 20 : 72-87. IKonijn, T. M., J. G. C. van de Meene, J. T. Bonner, and D. S. Barkley. 1967. The acrasin activity of adenosine-3',5'-cyclic phosphate. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S. 58 : 1152-1154. Konijn, T. M., D. S. Barkley, Y. Y. Chang, and J. T. Bonner. 1968. Cyclic AMP: A naturally occurring acrasin in the cellular slime molds. Am. Naturalist 102 : 225-233. Honda, F., and H. Imamura. 1968. Inhibition of cyclic 3',5'-nucleotide phosphodiesterases by pheno- thiazine and reserpine derivatives. Biochem. Biophys. Acta 161 : 267-269. Cheung, W. Y. 1970. Cyclic 3',5'-nucleotide phosphodiesterase. Demonstration of an activator. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 38 : 533-538. .Pollard, C. J. 1970. Influence of gibberellic acid on the incorporation of 8-14C adenine into adenosine 3',5'-cyclic phosphate in barley aleurone layers. Biochem. Biophys. Acta 201 511-512. IPollard, C. J. Manuscript in preparation.