in: fire.) . , Ii «tune:- Vn... r. ., .24....wvtc icifikgr . A.:Qi 1”]! . .2: ., . . . T i. ._ “mfg... ‘th . In.“ a’nr435rqo‘zflu . .a... . \I .z. . . 5 a? L aunt. .n .3: . ”£13.93th . $1.: 1 619.17.5258 ... 3.5.5:. 139.. .3. 9 A . (3.9. cur.) xt.‘ (II). V...‘ ‘1: ~fik¢ . ‘ I: ‘thA Tag» ‘0. 2.. .iaAIII. v . 20‘s.: THEI's .10011 This is to certify that the thesis entitled PARASITES OF JUVENILE BLUEGILL, LEPOMIS MACROCHIRUS AND YOUNG-OF-THE-YEAR LARGEMOUTH BASS, MICROPTERUS SALMOIDES IN THREE LAKES II AND GULL LAKE, MICHIGAN presented by BRENDA MAY PRACHEIL has been accepted towards fulfillment of the requirements for the M. S. degree in Zoology altr'lc)‘ m. (“u . Major Professcfl ignature Ma? legaooe Date MSU is an Affinnative Action/Equal Opportunity Institution LIBRARY Michigan State University PLACE IN RETURN BOX to remove this checkout from your record. TO AVOID FINES return on or before date due. MAY BE RECALLED with earlier due date if requested. DATE DUE DATE DUE DATE DUE 2/05 p:/ClRC/DaleDue.indd-p.1 PARASITES OF JUVENILE BLUEGILL, LEPOMIS MACROCHIR US AND YOUNG- OF—THE-YEAR LARGEMOUTH BASS, MICROPT ER US SALMOIDES IN THREE LAKES II AND GULL LAKE, MICHIGAN By Brenda May Pracheil A THESIS Submitted to Michigan State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE Department of Zoology Ecology, Evolutionary Biology and Behavior Program 2006 ABSTRACT PARASITES OF JUVENILE BLUEGILL, LEPOMIS MACROCHIRUS AND YOUNG- OF-THE-YEAR LARGEMOUTH BASS, MICROPTERUS SALMOIDES FROM THREE LAKES [I AND GULL LAKE, MICHIGAN By Brenda May Pracheil A total of 622 fish, 393 juvenile bluegill and 26 young-of-the-year (Y OY) largemouth bass from Three Lakes II, Michigan (TL) and 117 juvenile bluegill and 86 YOY largemouth bass from Gull Lake, Michigan (GL) were examined for parasites. Monogene, trematode, cestode, acanthocephalan, nematode and protozoan parasites infected juvenile bluegill and YOY Iargemouth bass. Larval trematodes, particularly Coptogonimus sp., were the most prevalent and abundant parasites in juvenile bluegill and YOY largemouth bass in both lakes. For bluegill in both lakes, the intestinal parasite component community diversity values (Shannon diversity) were not representative of total parasite component community diversity. Shannon diversity values for the total, enteric and parenteric component communities for TL largemouth bass were similar. Total parasite component community diversity of GL largemouth bass was higher than enteric or parenteric communities. Larval trematodes and parasites using small invertebrate intermediate hosts were the first parasites to colonize juvenile bluegill and YOY Iargemouth from both lakes. The percentage of the parasite species consisting of adult parasites generally increased with bluegill length in both lakes, but generally did not increase for YOY largemouth bass. Largemouth bass had higher parasite component community diversities than bluegill of the same age in both lakes. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would first like to thank my advisor Dr. Patrick Muzzall for all his guidance throughout my education at Michigan State University. His door was always open when I had questions or needed someone to debate the finer points of parasite ecology. He truly made my educational experience here a fruitful one. I also thank my committee members, Drs. Mary Bremigan and Don Hall for their input on this project. There have been several other people who have been instrumental to this project. I thank Merritt Gillilland for his help with statistics, snails and many great conversations about parasite communities. Thanks are also due to Josh Nixon for saving my computer fi'om crashing and Nate Coady, Laura Duclos and Matt Bolek for several engaging discussions about parasites which helped me to form ideas which were key in the completion of this work. Additionally, since pulling a seine solo is not an easy prospect, I thank Chris and Simon Pracheil, Nate and Kate Coady, Merritt Gillilland, Karl Strause, Andrea Winkle, Angelina Flores and Ai Shimizaki for field assistance. I finally thank my husband Chris and son Simon and my parents Martin and Becky Ferris for providing me with loving encouragement and emotional support while I completed my thesis work. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES .................................................................................. vi LISTOF FIGURES ............................................................................ ' .............................. v iii CHAPTER ONE: PARASITE INFRAPOPULATIONS AND COMMUNITIES OF JUVENILE BLUEGILL, LEPOMIS [MACROCHIRUS AND LARGEMOUTH BASS, MCROPIERUS SAIMOIDES IN THREE LAKES II, MICHIGAN ............... 1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................ 2 MATERIALS AND METHODS .......................................................... 6 RESULTS ................................................................................... 14 DISCUSSION ................................................................................... 24 CHAPTER TWO: PARASITE INFRAPOPULATIONS AND COMMUNITIES OF JUVENILE BLUEGILL, LEPOMIS WCROCHIRUS AND LARGEMOUTH BASS, MCROPIIERUS SAWOIDES IN GULL LAKE, MICHIGAN AND A COMPARISON OF PARASITE COMMUNITIES IN THREE LAKES II AND GULL LAKE, MICHIGAN ......................................................................................... 40 INTRODUCTION. ............................................................................................... 41 MATERIALS AND METHODS ......................................................... 45 RESULTS ................................................................................... 49 DISCUSSION ............................................................................... 55 CHAPTER THREE: ACQUISITION AND DYNAMICS OF THE PARASITE COMMUNITY OF JUVENILE BLUEGILL, LEPOMIS NIACROCHIRUS AND YOUNG-OF-THE-YEAR LARGEMOUTH BASS, MICROPTERUS SALMOIDES IN THREE LAKES H AND GULL LAKE, MICHIGAN .................................... 68 INTRODUCTION .......................................................................... 69 MATERIALS AND METHODS ......................................................... 72 RESULTS .................................................................................... 73 DISCUSSION .............................................................................. 75 iv CONCLUSION ...................................................................................... 8 1 APPENDIX 1 ....................................................................................... 130 APPENDIX 11 ...................................................................................... 134 APPENDIX [11 ..................................................................................... 135 APPENDIX IV ..................................................................................... 136 APPENDIX v ...................................................................................... 137 LITERATURE CITED ........................................................................... 138 LIST OF TABLES Table 1. Prevalence, mean abundance : SD (maximum) and site of infection of parasites of 393 juvenile Lepomis macrochirus in 2003 and 2004 from Three Lakes II, Michigan .................................................................................. 83 Table 2. Prevalence (%), mean abundance 3: SD (maximum) and site of infection of parasites of 26 young-of-the—year Microptems salmoides fi'om Three Lakes II, Michigan ............................................................................................. 86 Table 3. Mean abundance : SD (maximum) of parasites of juvenile Lepomis macrochirus with greater than 30% overall prevalence by cohort fi'om Three Lakes II, Michigan ................................................................................... 89 Table 4. Monthly prevalence, mean abundance : SD of parasites with greater than 30% overall prevalence fiom the 2001 cohort of Lepomis macrochirus from Three Lakes II, Michigan .......................................................................................... 90 Table 5. Monthly prevalence, mean abundance: SD of parasites with greater than 30% overall prevalence from the 2002 cohort of Lepomis macrochirus from Three Lakes H, Michigan .................................................................... 91 Table 6. Monthly prevalence, mean abundance: SD of parasites with greater than 30% overall prevalence fiom the 2003 cohort of Lepomis macrochims from Three Lakes H, Michigan .................................................................... 94 Table 7. Variance to mean abundance ratio for the most common parasites (parasites with >30°/o prevalence overall) for the 2002 cohort of Lepomis macrochirus from Three Lakes [1, Michigan by month ........................................ 95 Table 8. Variance to mean abundance ratio for the most common parasites (parasites with >30% prevalence overall) for the 2003 cohort of Lepomis macrochirus from Three Lakes [1, Michigan by month ....................................... 96 Table 9. Mean 3: SD (range) of Brillouin’s diversity and evenness and species richness and adjusted species richness for parasite infracommunities of Lepomis macrochirus from Three Lakes II, Michigan ..................................................... 97 Table 10. Mean 1 SD (range) of Brillouin’s diversity and evenness and species richness and adjusted species richness for parasite infracommunities of juvenile Lepomis macrochirus from Three Lakes [1, Michigan by cohort .............................. 98 Table 11. Mean : SD of Brillouin’s diversity and evenness and species richness and adjusted species richness for parasite infracommunities of for the 2001 cohort of juvenile Lepomis macrochirus from Three Lakes II, Michigan by month ...... 99 vi Table 12. Mean 1 SD of Brillouin’s diversity and evenness and species richness and adjusted species richness for parasite infiacommunities of for the 2002 cohort of juvenile Lepomis macrochirus from Three Lakes [1, Michigan by month ..... 100 Table 13. Mean 1: SD of Bn'llouin’s diversity and evenness and species richness and adjusted species richness for parasite infiacommunities of for the 2003 cohort of juvenile Lepomis macrochirus from. Three Lakes H, Michigan by month ...... 101 Table 14. Prevalence, mean abundance : SD (maximum) and site of infection of parasites of 117 juvenile Lepomis macrochirus from Gull Lake, Michigan by year. . . .. Table 15. Prevalence, mean abundance : SD (maximum) and site of infection of parasites of 86 juvenile Micropterus salmoides from Gull Lake, Michigan by year Table 16. Mean : SD (range) of Brillouin’s diversity and evenness and species richness and adjusted species richness for parasite infiacommunities of juvenile Lepomis macrochirus from Gull Lake, Michigan from the 2003 and 2004 102 ..... 105 sampling years ..................................................................................... 108 vii LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1. Map of Three Lakes H, Michigan with collection site ............................ 109 Figure 2. Mean lengths of Lepomis macrochims by cohort from Three lakes H, Michigan by month. Standard error bars are included on mean length bars .............. 110 Figure 3. Water temperature of Three Lakes H (TL) and Gull Lake (GL), Michigan by month ................................................................................ 111 Figure 4. Monthly abundance of mollusks by taxonomic group fi'om Three Lakes H, Michigan ......................................................................................... 112 Figure 5. Monthly mean larval trematodes per Lepomis macrochirus irrespective of cohort and total mollusks collected per month from Three Lakes H, Michigan ....... 113 Figure 6. Map of Gull Lake, Michigan with collection site ................................. 114 Figure 7. Monthly abundance of mollusks by taxonomic group from Gull Lake, Michigan ............................................................................................ 1 15 Figure 8. Monthly mean trematodes per Lepomis macrochirus and total mollusks collected per month from Gull Lake, Michigan ................................................ 116 Figure 9. Shannon diversity values for total, enteric and parenteric parasite component communities for Lepomis macrochirus (BG) and Micropterus salmoides (LMB) from Three Lakes H and Gull Lake, Michigan ........................... 117 Figure 10. Jaccard’s coefficient of community similarity for parasite component communities of juvenile Lepomis macrochirus and young-of-the-year Micropterus salmoides from Three Lakes H and Gull Lake, Michigan .................................... 118 Figure 11. Length of fish at first occurrence of parasite species from 392 juvenile Lepomis macrochirus from Three Lakes H, Michigan. Numbers above vertical lines represent the first occurrence of a parasite species and represent parasite species as follows: l—Cryptogom'mus sp. metacercaria; 2—Proteocephalus ambloplitis, 3—Trichodina sp., 4—Posthodiplostomum minimum, S—Neascus sp., 6—Azygia sp. , 7—Cwnallanus sp., 8——Spiroxys, 9—Neoechinorhynchus cylindratus, IO—Haplobothrium globuliforme, ll—Anchoradiscus sp., 12— Monogene sp., lB—Diplostomum sp., l4—Spinitectus sp., IS—Myxobolus sp. ., l6—A ctinocleidus sp.,17—Pomphorhynchus bulbocolli, 18—Clinostomum sp. ., 19—Crepidostomum sp. Height of lines arbitrarily determined” .. . .. 1 19 viii Figure 12. Length of fish at first occurrence of parasite species from 117 juvenile Lepomis macrochirus from Gull Lake, Michigan. Numbers above vertical lines represent the first occurrence of a parasite species and represent parasite species as follows: l—Cryptogonimus sp. metacercaria; 2— Posthodiplostomum minimum, 3—Diplosromum sp., 4—Pomphorhynclrus bulbocolli, S—Monogene sp., 6— Proieocephalus ambloplitis, 7—Neascus sp., 8—Anchoradiscus sp., 9— Neoechinorhynchus cylindratus, IO—Haplobothrium globuliforme, 11— Leptorlnmchoides thecaius, 12——Spinitectus sp., l3—Azygia sp., 14—— Actinocleidus sp., IS—Trichodina sp., 16—Myxobolus sp. Height of lines arbitrarily determined .............................................................................. 121 Figure 13. Length of fish at first occurrence of parasite species from 26 young- of-the-year Micropterus salmoides from Three lakes H, Michigan Numbers above vertical lines represent the first occurrence of a parasite species and represent parasite species as follows: l—Cryptogonimus sp. metacercaria; 2— Monogene sp., 3—Cryptogonimus sp. adult, 4—Proteocephalus ambloplitis, S—Trichodina sp., 6—Monogene sp. A, 7—Azygia sp., 8—Posrhodiplosromum minimum, 9— Neascus sp., IO—DI'pIostomum sp., ll—Neoechinorlrwclms cylindratus, 12— Pomphorhynchus bulbocolli, l3—Spiroxys sp., 14— Cmnallanus sp. Height of lines arbitrarily determined ....................................................................... 123 Figure 14. Length of fish at first occurrence of parasite species fiom 86 young- of—the-year Micropterus salmoides from Gull Lake, Michigan. Numbers above vertical lines represent the first occurrence of a parasite species and represent parasite species as follows: l—Coptogonimus sp. metacercaria; 2— Trichodina sp., 3—Camallanus sp., 4—Posthodiplostomum minimum, 5—DI'pIostomum sp., 6—Pr0te0cephalus ambloplitis, 7—Leptorlwnchoides thecatus, 8— Pomphorhynchus bulbocolli., 9—Monogene sp., 10—Azyg1'a sp., ll—Spinitectus sp., 12—Monogene sp. A, l3—Myxobolus sp., 14— Neoechinorhynchus cylindratus, 15—Clinostomum sp. Height of lines arbitrarily determined ................. 125 Figure 15. Percentage of adult parasite species of 392 juvenile Lepomis macrochirus from Three Lakes H, Michigan in five mm length classes. .................. 127 Figure 16. Percentage of adult parasite species of 117 juvenile Lepomis macrochirus from Gull Lake, Michigan by five mm length classes ......................... 128 Figure 17. Percentage of adult parasite species of 86 young-of-the-year Micropterus salmoides from Gull Lake, Michigan by five mm length classes ............ 129 ix CHAPTER ONE PARASITE INFRAPOPULATIONS AND COMMUNITIES OF JUVENILE BLUEGILL, LEPOMS WCROCHIRUS AND LARGEMOUTH BASS, MCROPIERUS SAWOIDES IN THREE LAKES II, MICHIGAN INTRODUCTION Fish habitat (Esch, 1971; Wilson et al., 1996), diet and age (McDaniel and Bailey, 1974; Cone and Anderson, 1977; Hanek and Fernando, 1978a, 1978b; Bailey, 1984) are determining factors in the composition and structure of parasite communities in centrarchid fishes. The habitat in which a fish resides largely determines which parasites it may host. Habitat attributes such as substrate type, vegetation type and quantity play a major role in parasite intermediate hosts found in an area. Mollusks serving as intermediate hosts for trematode parasites, for instance, shed larval trematodes that may infect a fish by direct penetration. By sharing habitat with these mollusks, fish may become infected with these parasites. Habitat, in turn, influences diet by determining what prey items (which may be serving as intermediate hosts) are available to a fish. For example, copepods serve as intermediate hosts for several species of parasites that are acquired by fish through ingestion. As a fish ages, it increases in size and surface area. With increased surface area, a fish increases its chances of becoming infected with parasites via direct penetration (Spall and Summerfelt, 1970). Also, some larval parasites, such as Posthodiplosromum minimum, are long-lived and accumulate in a fish over several years (Spall and Summerfelt, 1970; Hoffman, 1999). In bluegill, Lepomis macrochirus and largemouth bass, Micropterus salmoides, age may influence parasite communities because juveniles and adults have been shown to have different diets and habitats (Mittelbach, 1984; Werner and Hall, 1988; Olson, 1996; Post, 2003; Sammons and Maceina, 2005). The life history traits of juvenile bluegill and young-of-the-year (YOY) largemouth bass should contribute to the development of a parasite fauna unique to their life stage. Adult bluegill spawn in vegetated littoral areas in May or June in Michigan when water temperature reaches approximately 20° C (Breder, 193 6; Werner, 1967; Werner and Hall, 1988). After hatching approximately two weeks post-spawn (Breder, 1936), bluegill fry undergo a migration to the limnetic zone of a lake and remain there for approximately six to eight weeks (Werner, 1967; Werner and Hall, 1988). Juvenile fish then return to the vegetated littoral zone for the next two to three years (Werner and Hall, 1988) until they move to the limnetic zone of the lake for the duration of their life (Werner and Hall, 1988). The shift to the limnetic habitat gradually takes place in bluegill between 45 and 75 mm SL (Osenberg et al., 1992). At approximately 75 mm SL, bluegill switch to feeding almost exclusively in the limnetic zone of a lake (Werner and Hall, 1988), which is approximately commensurate with maturity (Osenberg et al., 1992). Throughout life, bluegill prey on aquatic invertebrates that serve as intermediate hosts for many types of parasites (Zischke and Vaughn, 1962; Werner, 1969; McDaniel and Bailey, 1974; Sadzikowsi and Wallace, 1976; Cone and Anderson, 1977; Werner and Hall, 1988; Fisher and Kelso, 1990). However, the invertebrate prey available in the limnetic zone where bluegill spend their adult life differs from that available in the vegetated littoral zone where they live as juveniles (Mittelbach, 1984; Werner and Hall, 1988). This shifi in diet and habitat may cause the parasite fauna to concurrently shift (Wilson et al., 1996). Additionally, the vegetated habitat of juvenile bluegill is habitat for many mollusks that serve as intermediate hosts for trematodes that shed larval parasites that directly penetrate bluegill (Wilson et al., 1996). Largemouth bass spawn in April or May in Michigan in vegetated littoral areas (Breder, 1936) when the water temperature reaches approximately 15-18° C (Mittelbach and Persson, 1998). The YOY largemouth bass remain in the littoral zone for the first few weeks to months of life feeding on invertebrates (Gilliam, 1982; Olson, 1996; Post, 2003). When largemouth bass become large enough to eat fish, they switch to a piscivorous diet, primarily preying on juvenile bluegill (Gilliam, 1982; Olson, 1996; Post, 2003) and continue to prey on fishes throughout their life. Since largemouth bass eat aquatic invertebrates such as copepods, arnphipods and mayflies for the first few weeks to months of life (Sale, 1981; Gilliam, 1982; Fischer and Kelso, 1990; Olson, 1996; Dibble and Harrel, 1997; Post, 2003), they may acquire parasites that use these invertebrates as intermediate hosts. As is the case with juvenile bluegill, while living in the vegetated littoral zone, largemouth bass are vulnerable to colonization by larval trematodes shed by mollusks. Since largemouth has become piscivorous early in life, primarily eating juvenile bluegill, they may acquire parasites that use bluegill as intermediate or paratenic hosts. Because juvenile and adult bluegill (Werner and Hall, 1988) and juvenile and adult largemouth bass (Werner and Hall, 1988; Sammons and Maceina, 2005) have different habitats and diets, parasite faunas should differ between juvenile (pre- reproductive) and adult (reproductively mature) fish. Most studies on the parasites of bluegill and largemouth bass are restricted to the examination of adult fish or fish of unknown age (see Hoffman, 1999 for a list of studies of bluegill parasites). Few studies report on changes in bluegill parasite communities with host age (McDaniel and Bailey, 1974; Cloutman, 1975) and only one study examines parasite community dynamics of largemouth bass with host age (Cloutman, 1975). Studies on the parasite communities of juvenile bluegill and YOY largemouth bass are limited to Fischer and Kelso (1987, 1988, 1990), Landry and Kelso (1999) and Steinauer and Font (2003). All these studies were conducted in Louisiana which may not be indicative of the parasite communities of these fish in Michigan. Effects of fish age on parasite community composition and structure in juvenile bluegill and YOY largemouth bass were also not examined in the above studies. Fisher and Kelso (1987, 1988, 1990), Landry and Kelso (1999) and Steinauer and Font (2003) reported that parasite communities of juvenile bluegill and YOY largemouth bass were dominated by larval trematodes. However, not all larval trematodes in these studies were counted so the numeric role and the effect these parasites have on parasite community diversity of juvenile bluegill and YOY largemouth bass is not known. The objectives of this study were to determine patterns of parasite infrapopulation abundance and prevalence for the most common parasites of three cohorts of juvenile bluegill (C optogonimus sp., Posthodiplostomum minimum, Neascus sp. and Proteocephalus ambloplitis) and YOY largemouth bass (Coptogonimus sp. metacercariae, Neascus sp., P. minimum, Diplosromum sp., Neoechinorhynchus cylindratus and Proteocephalus ambloplitis) from Three Lakes H, Michigan; to determine patterns of parasite infracommunity diversity in three cohorts of juvenile bluegill; and finally, to describe parasite component community diversities in juvenile bluegill and YOY largemouth bass. MATERIALS AND METHODS Description of Study Site Three Lakes H (Figure 1) (hereafter referred to as TL) is in Kalamazoo County, Michigan and is connected to two other lakes, Three Lakes 1 and Three Lakes III, by short (<1 km) channels (Mittelbach, 1984). Three lakes H is a eutrophic lake with a surface area of 22 hectares and exhibits thermal stratification (Mittelbach, 1984). This lake has a broad littoral zone that extends up to 60 m fi'om shore with a bottom that gradually slopes to a maximum depth of approximately 10 m (Mittelbach, 1984). Fish Collection and Examination Collection of fish took place in a shallow (<15 m) area on the southeast side of the lake where the yellow pond lily, Nuphar Iutea was the dominant vegetation. A total of 393 juvenile bluegill (209 from 2003 and 184 from 2004) were collected by seine in June through November, 2003 and April through July, 2004. Twenty-six YOY largemouth bass were also collected by seine in July and September, 2003. Upon collection, fish were placed in aerated coolers and transported to the laboratory at Michigan State University. Fish were killed within 48 hours of collection by an overdose of the anesthetic MS-222. The standard length (SL), distance from the tip of the snout to the end of the caudal peduncle, was measured in millimeters for each fish before being preserved in a vial of 70% ethyl alcohol. Five scales from each fish were removed from under the lefi pectoral fin below the lateral line for aging. Scales were mounted on glass slides and scale annuli were counted using dissecting and compound microscopes. Some fish were examined immediately after euthanization so live parasites could be properly fixed for identification purposes. The head of the fish was removed and the remainder of the fish was out along the ventral surface to the vent. The stomach, pyloric ceca, intestine, gall bladder, liver, spleen, kidneys, heart, eyes, brain, gonads, nares, skin, fins, muscles, and gills were placed in Petri dishes containing tap water and examined for parasites. The location of all parasites and the number of all countable parasites (parasites except monogenes and protonans) were recorded. Only prevalence of monogenes and protozoans was recorded because MS-222 may have caused some of these parasites to fall off the fish, so accurate ‘ counts of these parasites could not be made. Parasites were preserved in 70% ethyl alcohol. Parasite Preparation and Identification Protozoan parasites were identified on wet mount slides. Trematodes, monogenes, cestodes and acanthocephalans were rehydrated in a graded ethyl alcohol series and were left in each solution for approximately one hour. The rehydration series concentrations were as follows: 70% ethyl alcohol; 40% ethyl alcohol; 20% ethyl alcohol; and 100 % distilled water. Parasites were then placed in a Stentor dish of Grenacher’s borax carmine stain overnight and then removed to another Stentor dish of distilled water for one hour. The parasites were then dehydrated in a graded ethyl alcohol series and were left in each solution for approximately one hour. The dehydration series concentrations were as follows: 20% ethyl alcohol; 40% ethyl alcohol; 70% ethyl alcohol; 80% ethyl alcohol; 95% ethyl alcohol; and two repetitions of 100% ethyl alcohol. Parasites were moved to a Stentor dish of xylene to clear for approximately one hour and mounted on glass slides using Canada balsam diluted with xylene and covered with a glass coverslip. Nematodes were cleared by adding five drops of 100% glycerine daily until all ethyl alcohol evaporated and stored in vials of 100% glycerine. Parasitological Terminology A host is an animal which is infected with a parasite (Roberts and Janovy, 2004). A definitive host is one in which the parasite becomes sexually mature and produces some type of offspring (Roberts and Janovy, 2004). An intermediate host is one in which the parasite does not reach sexual maturity but undergoes growth and development necessary to infect the next host in its life cycle (Roberts and Janovy, 2004). A paratenic host is one in which the parasite does not reach sexual maturity and does not undergo growth and development necessary to infect the next host in the life cycle, yet still remains alive and infective (Roberts and Janovy, 2004). Parasite paratenic hosts bridge trophic gaps between intermediate and definitive hosts. For instance, adult largemouth bass infrequently eat copepods, the intermediate host for a cestode parasite of these fish. Bluegill can become infected with a larval stage of this cestode when eating an infected copepod (Hunter, 1928). The largemouth bass can become infected with this cestode parasite by eating an infected bluegill. A direct life cycle does not require an intermediate host for sexual reproduction (Roberts and Janovy, 2004). An indirect life cycle requires development in one or more intermediate hosts prior to sexual reproduction (Roberts and Janovy, 2004). A parasite infracommunity is the community of all species of parasites in one host individual (Bush et al., 1997). A parasite component community is the community of all species of parasites infecting one host species in a geographic area (Bush et al., 1997). Enteric parasites occur within the gastrointestinal tract and parenteric parasites live in sites outside of the gastrointestinal tract (Roberts and Janovy, 2004). Life cycles and life stage terminology of parasites found in the present study are in Appendix I. The most common parasite species were defined as those with greater than 30% prevalence (arbitrarily detemrined) in examined fish for each host species. The term prevalence is the percentage of individuals in a sample infected with a parasite species (Bush et al., 1997). Abundance is the number of parasites of a species in a fish and mean abundance is the mean number of parasites of a species per examined fish in a sample (Bush et al., 1997). Species richness is the number of parasite species per host and mean species richness is the mean number of parasite species per fish in a sample. Adjusted species richness is the number of countable parasite species per host and mean adjusted species richness is the mean number of countable parasites per fish in a sample. Adjusted species richness was calculated in order for comparisons to be made between species richness and Brillouin’s diversity and evenness values, which only include countable parasites. Data Analysis Names of fish cohorts correspond to the year those fish hatched. For example, fish that hatched in 2003 are referred to as the 2003 cohort of fish. The 2001 cohort of bluegill consisted of age 2 fish collected in June-October, 2003; the 2002 cohort of bluegill consisted of age 1 fish collected in June-October, 2003 and age 2 fish collected in April-July, 2004; and the 2003 cohort of bluegill consisted of age 0 fish collected in June- October, 2003 and age 1 fish collected in April-July, 2004. No fish with mature gonads .were examined in the present study. Mean fish lengths are expressed as mean 1 standard deviation (SD) (range). Prevalence and Mean Abundance of the Most Common Parasites Mean parasite abundances are expressed as mean 1 SD (maximum). Parasite abundance values were natural log transformed for nomrality. All statistical comparisons were considered significant at the a=0.05 level. Because multiple chi-square analyses were needed to detect significant differences in prevalence among cohorts of fish, Bonferroni corrections were used to compute a lower a—value to minimize experimentwise error. The new a—value for these tests was 0.02. Chi-square analyses were used to detect significant differences in prevalence of the most common parasite species by comparing numbers of infected and uninfected bluegill between sampling years irrespective of fish cohort and between fish cohorts irrespective of sampling year. An unpaired t-test was used to detect significant differences in mean abundances of the most common parasite species of juvenile bluegill between the 2003 and 2004 sampling years. In cases where variance was not equal between samples, a t-test assuming unequal variance was used. Analysis of variance (PROC MIXED, SAS 9.1) was used to test for significant differences in mean abundances of most common parasite species among cohorts of TL bluegill. Tukey’s HSD was used for all pairwise comparisons between cohorts. Analysis of variance (PROC MIXED, SAS 9.1) was used to test for significant differences in mean abundances of most common parasite species among months of collection for TL bluegill. Tukey’s HSD was used for all pairwise comparisons between months. Variance to mean abundance ratios were calculated for the most common parasites of the 2002 and 2003 cohorts of bluegill in order to infer that decreases in 10 prevalence and mean abundance were due to parasite-induced mortality of bluegill. Monthly patterns of infracommunities of the most common parasites of YOY largemouth bass were not examined due to low numbers of bass examined. A Spearman’s rank correlation was used to detect relationships between untransformed abundances of the most common parasite species and fish length for bluegill and largemouth bass irrespective of cohort and sampling year and for each cohort of bluegill. A Spearman’s rank correlation was also used to detect relationships between untransformed abundances of the most common parasite species, Brillouin’s diversity, evenness, species richness and adjusted species richness and fish length for juvenile bluegill in each cohort irrespective of sampling year. Parasite Infracommunities Mean Brillouin’s diversity and evenness values, species richness and adjusted species richness values for parasite infracommunities are expressed as mean 1 standard deviation (SD) (range). Parasite infiacommunity diversity, evenness, species richness and adjusted species richness values were natural log transformed for normality. Values for Brillouin’s index for use in diversity and evenness (Pielou, 1975; Magurran, 1988) were calculated for each fish examined using common logarithms for all countable parasites irrespective of their site of infection to measure diversity and evenness for the parasite infiacommunity. Values for the Shannon diversity index were calculated for each host species in each lake using common logarithms for all countable parasites irrespective of their site of infection to measure diversity of the total parasite component community. Separate Shannon diversity values for each host species for total, enteric and II parenteric parasites were calculated to determine whether diversities of these parasite component communities were comparable. All statistical comparisons were considered significant at the a=0.05 level. An unpaired t-test was used to detect significant differences in mean parasite infracommunity diversity, evenness, species richness and adjusted species richness of juvenile bluegill between the 2003 and 2004 sampling years. In cases where variance was not equal between samples, a t-test assuming unequal variance was used. Analysis of variance (PROC MIXED, SAS 9.1) was used to test for significant differences in mean parasite infiacommunity diversity, evenness, species richness and adjusted species richness among cohorts of TL bluegill. Tukey’s HSD was used for all pairwise comparisons between cohorts. Analysis of variance (PROC MIXED, SAS 9.1) was used to test for significant differences in parasite infracommunity diversity, evenness, species richness and adjusted species richness among months of collection for TL bluegill. Tukey’s HSD was used for all pairwise comparisons between months. Spearman’s rank correlation was used to detect relationships between untransformed parasite infiacommunity diversity, evenness, species richness, adjusted species richness and bluegill and largemouth bass length irrespective of cohort and sampling year and for each cohort of bluegill. A t-test for two Shannon diversity values was used to compare enteric and parenteric component community diversity values to total component community diversity values in juvenile bluegill and YOY largemouth bass. This t-test was also used to compare total component community diversity between age-0 bluegill and YOY 12 largemouth bass. The variance of the parasite component community diversities for bluegill and largemouth bass was approximated by: .2 = )3,- logzfi — (afi- log/.32 n'1 H where fl: number of individuals of each species, and n= number of individuals of all species (Brower et al., 1993), for the test statistic: r= H1’ —H2’ (312+322)m (Brower et al., 1993) which is compared to the Student’s t-distribution with a = 0.05 and degrees of fi'eedom approximated by: DF= QSZH1'+ s2H2L2 ISZHl’lz'I‘ (3211212 n1 n2 (Brower et al., 1993). Mollusk Collection Mollusks were collected three meters from shore starting at the midpoint of the fish collection area each month fish were sampled. Five one minute side-by-side transects were sampled by sweeping an aquatic D-fiame dip net through the water column from the top layer of substrate, through the submergent vegetation up to the water’s surface (Hairston et al., 1958; Brown, 1979). All contents of the nets were emptied into a container and preserved in 10% formalin or 70% ethyl alcohol in the field. Mollusks were identified to family with a key to aquatic snails of the United States (Burch, 1982, 1988; Burch and Tottenham, 1980) and counted. 13 RESULTS Host Demographics A total of 393 juvenile bluegill (209 from 2003 and 184 from 2004) and 26 YOY largemouth bass were examined from TL. Irrespective of cohort, bluegill collected in 2003 and 2004 had mean lengths of31.8 : 8.7 (16-54) mm and 28.1 i 5.0 (20—42) mm, respectively. Bluegill collected in 2003 were significantly larger than those collected in 2004 (t=4.61, p<0.01, 345 d.f.). The 2001 cohort consisted of 66 age 2 bluegill collected in 2003; the 2002 cohort consisted of 63 age 1 bluegill collected in 2003 and 28 age 2 bluegill collected in 2004; and the 2003 cohort consisted of 80 age 0 bluegill collected in 2003 and 156 age 1 bluegill collected in 2004. Monthly mean lengths of fish by cohort are in Figure 2. Monthly water temperatures from TL are in Figure 3. The YOY largemouth bass were collected in July and September, 2003 and consisted of 26 age 0 fish with a mean length of 38.4 i 15.0 (19—69) mm. Largemouth bass fiom TL were significantly longer than age 0 bluegill (t=-5.38, p<0.01, 25 d.f.). Parasites of Juvenile Bluegill and Young-of-the—Year Largemouth Bass Prevalence and mean abundance : SD (maximum) for all parasite species of juvenile bluegill by sampling year are in Table 1. Juvenile bluegill were infected with 71,400 parasites from fourteen countable parasite species: seven trematodes, Azygia sp., Crepidostomum sp., Clinostomum sp., Coprogonimus sp., Diplostomum sp., Neascus sp. and Posthadiplostomum minimum; two cestodes, Proteocephalus ambloplitis and Haplobothrium globuliforme, two acanthocephalans, Neoechinorlnmchus cylindratus and Pomphorhynchus bulbocolli; three nematodes, CamaIIwrus sp., Spinitectus sp. and 14 Spiroxys sp. Bluegill were also infected with five non-countable parasite species: three monogenes, Actinocleidus sp., Anchoradiscus sp. and Monogene sp.; and two protozoans, Myxobolus sp. and T richodina sp. Some individuals of Crepidostomum sp., Spinitecrus sp., Anchoradiscus sp. and Actinocleidus sp. were gravid adults- Parenteric larval parasites, Clinostomum sp., Cryptogonimus sp., Diplostomum sp., Neascus sp., P. minimum, P. ambloplitis, H. globuliforme, N. cylinrb'anw and Spiroxys sp. comprised 996% of all parasites counted. The larval trematode Coptogonimus sp. accounted for 93.2% of all parasites. Prevalence and mean abundance : SD (maximum) for all parasites of YOY largemouth bass are in Table 2. Young-of-the-year largemouth bass were infected with 1,157 parasites fiom 10 countable parasite species: five trematodes, Azygia sp., Coptogonimus sp., Diplostomum sp., Neascus sp. and P. minimum; one cestode, P. ambloplitis; two acanthocephalans, N. cylincb'arus and P. bulbocolli; two nematodes, CamaIlanus sp. and Spiroxys sp. Largemouth bass were also infected with three species of non-countable parasites: two monogenes, Monogene sp. and Monogene sp. A; and one protozoan, T richodina sp. Some individuals of Monogene sp. A, Coptogonimus sp. and CamaIIanus sp. were gravid adults. Parenteric larval parasites, Coptogonimus sp. metacercariae, Diplostomum sp., Neascus sp., P. minimum, P. ambloplitis and Spiroxys sp. accounted for 95.8% of all parasites counted. Both adults and metacercariae of Coptogonimus sp. were found. Cryptogonimus sp. metacercariae, which had the highest prevalence and mean abundance, accounted for 76.9% of all parasites. Many parasite species were common to both juvenile bluegill and YOY largemouth bass in TL, but a 15 larger percentage of the parasites of juvenile bluegill consisted of larval trematodes, particularly Coptogonimus sp. Prevalence and Mean Abundance of the Most Common Parasite Species The most common parasite species of juvenile bluegill were Coptogonimus sp., Neascus sp., Posthodiplostomum minimum and Proteocephalus ambloplitis. The most common parasite species of YOY largemouth bass were Coptogonimus sp., Neascus sp., Posthodrplostomum minimum, Diplosromum sp., Neoechinorhynchus cylindratus and Proteocephalus ambloplitis. Abundance of the most common parasites was not consistently higher in one year than in another. Bluegill from 2003 had significantly higher prevalences of Neascus sp. (X2=11.37, p<0.01) and P. ambloplitis (X2=15.63, p<0.01) than bluegill from 2004. Bluegill from 2004 had significantly higher prevalences of P. minimum (X2=23.07, p<0.01) than bluegill from 2003. There was no significant difference in prevalence of Coprogonimus sp. between sampling years. Bluegill had significantly higher mean abundances of Coprogonimus sp. (t=6.89, p<0.01, 393 d.f), Posthodiplosromum minimum (t=8.71, p<0.01, 393 d.f.) and Neascus sp. (t=4.53, p<0.01, 393 d.f.) in 2003 than 2004 and significantly higher mean abundances of Proteocephalus ambloplitis (t=2.97, p<0.01, 393 d.f.) in 2004 than in 2003. Prevalence and mean abundance : SD (maximum) for the most common parasite species of juvenile bluegill by cohort irrespective of collection year in Table 3. Coptogonimus sp. and P. minimum were the most prevalent and abundant parasite species for all cohorts of juvenile bluegill. In general, the older cohorts of bluegill had higher prevalences of the most common parasites. The 2001 cohort of bluegill had significantly higher prevalences of P. minimum (X2=14.41, p<0.01), Neascus sp. l6 (x2=45.34. o99% >99% Muscle, 244.2 : 354.2 84.4 1 150.3 Brain, Gills, (2387) (1563) Mesenteries Diplostomum sp.‘ 12% 11% Vitreous Humor 0.3 i 1.2 0.2 :1; 0.8 (9) (6) Neascus sp. * 50% 29% Muscle, Mesenteries, 3.3 i 9.3 1.3 1 3.3 Kidney (l 14) (28) Posthodiplostomum 62% 73% Liver, Kidney minimum“ 1 1.8 3; 15.8 3.8 i 7.0 Mesenteries, (93) (57) Gonad Cestoda Haplobothrium 7% 7% Liver, Mesenteries, globulifbrme“ 0.1 1 0.5 0.1 :1; 0.3 Gills (6) (2) Table 1. 84 Pmteocephalus 52% 32% Liver, Mesenteries ambloplitis" 0.9 i 1.7 0.6 i 1.2 (13) (9) Nematoda Coma/[anus sp. <1% 2% Intestine <0.]:0.2 <0.li0.1 (1) (l) Spinitectus sp. 17% l 1% Intestine 0.6 i 1.8 0.4 i 1.3 (14) (3) Spiroxys sp.* 4% 1% Muscle <0.1:0.3 <0.]:0.1 (2) (l) Acanthocephala Pomphorhjmchus <1% 2% Liver bulbocolli <0.l : 0.2 <0. I: 0.2 (2) (2) Neoechinorhynchus 1% 2% Intestine cylindratus" <0.1 i 0.3 <0. I: 0.1 (5) (1) Protozoa Myxobolus sp. 8% 4% Gills Trichodina sp. 6% 10°/o Gills = = = Table l (con’t). * Indicates larval parasite. T Parasite prevalence. I Parasite mean abundance :1; SD (maximum). 85 Proteocephalus 52% ambloplitis" 0.9 : 1.7 (13) Nematoda Camallanus sp. <1% <0.] : 0.2 (1) Spinitecrus sp. 17% 0.6 : 1.8 (14) Spirouys sp.‘ 4% <0.1 : 0.3 (2) Acanthocephala Pomphorhynchus <1% bulbocolli <0.] : 0.2 (2) Neoechinorhynchus 1% cylindratus" <0.l : 0.3 (5) Protozoa Myxobolus sp. 8% Trichodina sp. 6% — __ Table 1 (con’t). * Indicates larval parasite. T Parasite prevalence. I Parasite mean abundance : SD (maximum). 32% 0.6 : 1.2 (9) 2% <0.1:0.l (1) 11% 0.4 : 1.3 (8) 1% <0.1: 0.1 (1) 2% <0. 1: 0.2 (2) 2% <0.1: 0.1 (l) 4% 10% Liver, Mesenteries Intestine Intestine Muscle Liver Intestine Gills Gills Table 2. Prevalence (%), mean abundance : SD (maximum) and site of infection of parasites of 26 young-of-the-year Micropterus salmoides fiom Three Lakes 11, Michigan. 86 Parasite Monogenea Monogene sp. A Monogenea sp. Trematoda Azygia sp. C ryptogonimus sp. Cryptogonimus sp. * Diplostomum sp. * Neascus sp.* Posthodiplostomum minim um * Cestoda Proteocephalus ambloplitis“ Nematoda Carnallanus sp. Table 2. 15% 0.2 i 0.51 (2) 4% 0.2 i 0.6 (3) 85% 34.2 : 55.1 (249) 35% 0.6 i 1.0 (4) 50% 2.4 i 5.3 (26) 38% 1.0 i 1.6 (6) 88% 4.3 i 2.9 (11) 4% 0.13502 (1) 87 Site of Infection Gills Gills Stomach, Pyloric Ceca, Intestine Stomach, Pyloric Ceca, Intestine Muscle, Cartilage, Brain, Gills, Mesenteries Vitreous Humor Muscle, Mesenteries, Kidney Liver, Kidney, Cartilage, Gills, Mesenteries Liver, Mesenteries, Gonad Intestine, Pyloric Ceca, Stomach Spiroxys sp. * 4% Muscle 0.1 : 0.3 (1) Acanthocephala Neoechinorhynchus 3 5% Intestine cylindratus 1.4 : 4.1 (20) Pomphorhynchus 8% Intestine, bulbocolli 0.1 : 0.3 Mesenteries, (1) Muscle Protozoa T richodina sp. 8% Gills Table 2 (con’t). * Indicates larval stage. T Parasite prevalence. I Parasite mean abundance : SD (maximum). 88 Cohort N Cryptogoninrus Neascus Posrhodiplostomum Proteocephalus sp. sp. minimum ambloplitis 2001 98%* 73°/ 95% 68% 66 470.7 : 489.91 4.8 : 6.9 18.2 : 22.2 1.4 : 1.9 (2387) (29) (93) (12) 2002 100% 62% ‘ 98% 55% 91 265.5 : 249.8 4.6 : 12.6 14.6 : 13.2 1.4 : 2.1 (1563) (114) (57) (13) 2003 >99% 24% 72% 26% 235 48.0 : 71.3 0.8 : 2.6 2.7 : 3.0 0.3 : 0.8 (474) (28) (19) (4) * Parasite prevalence. 1‘ Mean : SD (maximum). Table 3. Prevalence and mean abundance : SD (maximum) of parasites of juvenile Lepomis macrochirus with greater than 30% overall prevalence by cohort from Three Lakes 11, Michigan. 89 Month N ervptogonimus Neascus Posrhodiplostomum Proteocephalus sp. 3). minimum ambloplitis June, 2003 19 94%* 22°/ 89% 72% 106.9 :116.71‘ 0.7 :1.8 8.1 : 13.2 1.5 :1.4 at a a a July 12 100% 70% 90% 60% 602.8: 525.0 2.5 : 2.9 7.0 : 5.4 1.3 : 1.6 b ab a a August 20 100% 83% 100% 67% 742.7: 597.2 4.4 : 5.1 12.2 : 14.8 1.7 : 2.7 b b a a September 9 100% 100% 100% 80% 381.2: 182.7 9.1 : 8.9 44.6 : 23.6 1.0 : 1.0 b b b a October 6 100% 100% 100% 33% 586.3: 430.5 17.8 : 7.4 53.0 : 21.8 0.7 : 1.2 b c b a * Parasite prevalence. T Parasite mean abundance : SD (maximum). I Mean abundances followed by the same letter within the same column are not significantly different from each other. Table 4. Monthly prevalence, mean abundance : SD of parasites with greater than 30% overall prevalence from the 2001 cohort ofLepomis macrochirus from Three Lakes 11, Michigan. 90 Table 5. Monthly prevalence, mean abundance: SD of parasites with greater than 30% overall prevalence from the 2002 cohort of Lepomis macrochirus from Three Lakes H, Michigan. 91 Month N ervprogonimus Neascus Posthodiplostomum Proteocephalus sp. sp. minimum ambloplitis June, 2003 11 100%“ l7°/ 100% 67% 31.45 i 6461 0.7: 1.8 4.8 : 4.6 0.8 : 0.9 331: a a a July 3 100% 40% 100% 80% 441.0 : 48.8 13:12 6.3 :1.5 1.0 :1.0 b ab abc a August 12 100% 58% 100% 67% 257.2 : 118.9 1.6: 1.7 6.8 : 6.6 1.9 : 1.4 b ab 3 a September 21 100% 76% 100% 80% 312.0 : 206.0 8.5: 24.4 18.1 : 11.7 1.3 : 3.1 b ab be a October 16 100% 81% 100% 33% 336.9 : 345.6 7.4 : 7.4 27.9 : 10.4 1.3 : 1.6 b b c a April, 2004 3 100% 100% 100% 100% 216.0 : 165.0 8.7 : 9.3 21.7 : 9.1 2.0 : 1.0 ab ab abc a May 4 100% 100% 100% 25% 452.8 : 741.7 3.5 : 2.4 31.0 : 25.5 0.5 : 1.0 ab ‘ ab abc a June 4 100% 25% 75% 50% 58.0 : 119.0 0.3 : 0.5 10.5 : 10.7 3.5 : 4.4 ab ab ab a July 17 100% 65% 94% 47% 224.6 : 115.3 2.8 : 3.4 6.7 : 6.2 1.2 : 1.6 b ab a a _ Table 5. * Parasite prevalence. I Parasite mean abundance : SD (maximum). 1 Mean abundances followed by the same letter within the same column are not significantly different from each other. Table 6. Monthly prevalence, mean abundance: SD of parasites with greater than 30% overall prevalence from the 2003 cohort of Lepomis macrochirus from Three Lakes H, Michigan. 93 Month N Cryptogonimus Neascus Posthodiplostomum Proteocephalus jg. sp. minimum ambloplitis June, 2003 2 100%“ 50% 100% 50% 26.0 :1: 14.11- 0.5 : 0.7 5.5 : 3.5 0.5 : 0.7 abch 3 b a July 0 —‘I -— - - August 5 100% 29% 0% 20% 4.8 : 3.4 0 0 0.2 : 0.4 a a a a September 35 100% 26% 89% 23% 28.8 : 15.0 0.4 : 0.8 2.7 : 2.1 0.3 : 0.5 ed a be 3 October 38 100% 67% 100% 11% 42.9 : 41.7 0.8 : 2.2 4.6 : 3.2 0.1 : 0.4 cd 3 c a April, 2004 13 100% 38% 85% 31% 20.8 : 13.7 0.5 : 0.8 4.9 : 5.4 0.8 : 1.5 bc a be a May 55 98% 13% 62% 31% “9:86 04:13 16:21 04:07 ab a ab 3 June 65 100% 8% 62% 31% 44.18 : 27.6 0.2 : 0.6 1.7 : 2.3 0.4 : 0.6 d a ab a July 23 100% 78% 78% 47% 209.47 : 129.5 5.1 : 6.1 3.9 : 3.2 0.3 : 0.9 e b c a — Table 6. * Parasite prevalence. T Parasite mean abundance : SD. I Means followed by the same letter within the same column are not significantly different from each other. \1 Indicates no fish were examined. Month Cryptogonimus Neascus Posthodiplostomum ProteocephaluT sp. sp. minimum ambloplitis June, 2003 51.26 22.8 12.53 2.05 July 5.39 0.25 0.59 3.33 August 164.98 1.90 6.37 1.09 September 382.74 69.95 7.55 7.29 October 354.41 7.99 3.89 2.01 April, 2004 126.10 9.96 3.80 0.50 May 1215.17 1.62 26.53 2.00 June 89.65 0.34 13.93 12.93 July 59.21 4.04 5.67 2.03 Table 7. Variance to mean abundance ratio for the most common parasites (parasites with >3 0% prevalence overall) for the 2002 cohort ofLepomis macrochirus from Three Lakes 11, Michigan by month. 95 Month C Iyptogonimus Neascus Posthodiplostomum Proteocephalus sp. sp. minimum ambIopliris June, 2003 7.6 1.0 2.27 1.00 July at: a: a at: August 2.44 T T 1.00 September 7.81 1.59 1.66 1.00 October 38.00 5.95 2.20 1.31 April, 2004 8.99 1.11 5.89 2.60 May 6.22 4.56 2.72 1.08 June 14.80 2.13 3.14 0.97 July 80.00 0.25 0.17 0.60 * Indicates no fish examined. T Indicates no fish infected. Table 8. Variance to mean abundance ratio for the most common parasites (parasites with >30% prevalence overall) for the 2003 cohort ofLepomis macrochirus from Three Lakes H, Michigan by month. 96 2003 2004 Brillouin’s diversity 0.16 : 0.13 0.12 : 0.10 (0-0.97) (0-0.44) Brillouin’s evenness 0.30 : 0.20 0.28 : 0.24 (0-1.00) (0-1.00) Species Richness 3.7 : 1.5 2.9 : 1.5 (1-9) (1-8) Adjusted Species 3.4 : 1.3 2.7 : 1.3 Richness (1-7) (1-6) Table 9. Mean : SD (range) of Brillouin’s diversity and evenness and species richness and adjusted species richness for parasite infiacommunities of Lepomis macrochirus from Three Lakes H, Michigan. 97 Cohort Brillouin’s Brillouin’s Species Adjusted Species Diversity Evenness Richness Richness 2001 0.15 : 0.14 0.25 : 0.19 4.5 : 1.6 4.0 :1.3 (0-0.97) (0070) (1—9) (1-7) 2002 0.17 i 0.14 0.28 i 0.19 4.4 11.3 4.0 11.2 (0.090) (0-1) (1-7) (1-7) 2003 0.13 i 0.10 0.31 i 0.23 2.6 :12 2.5 i 1.1 (0044) (0-1) (1-8) (1-5) Table 10. Mean : SD (range) of Brillouin’s diversity and evenness and species richness and adjusted species richness for parasite infracommunities of juvenile Lepomis macrochirus from Three Lakes H, Michigan by cohort. 98 Brillouin’s Brillouin’s Species Adjusted Diversity Evennees Richness Species Richness June, 2003 0.21 : 0.20" 0.34 : 0.21 3.6 : 1.2 3.0 : 0.8 bT b a a July 0.07 : 0.07 0.08 : 0.01 4.3 : 1.6 3.8 : 1.3 a a a ab August 0.11:0.10 0.16:0.16 5.9:1.3 5.1:1.1 ab a b b September 0.19 : 0.06 0.35 : 0.13 3.8 : 0.7 3.8 : 0.7 b b a ab October 0.22 : 0.12 0.38 : 0.20 4.2 : 1.5 4.0 : 1.1 b b ab ab * Mean : SD. T Means followed by the same letter within the same column are not significantly different from each other. Table 11. Mean : SD of Brillouin’s diversity and evenness and species richness and adjusted species richness for parasite infracommunities of for the 2001 cohort of juvenile Lepomis macrochirus from Three Lakes 11, Michigan by month. 99 Brillouin’s Brillouin’s Species Adjusted Diversity Evermeas Richness Species Richness June, 2003 0.21 : 019* 0.38 : 0.27 3.3 : 1.2 3.0 : 0.8 81' a ab a July 0.04 : 0.01 0.08 _+_ 0.01 3.7 : 0.6 3.3 : 0.6 a a abc ab August 0.11 :0.06 0.18:0.10 4.8: 1.1 4.3 :09 a 8 abc ab September 0.20 : 0.19 0.29 : 0.18 4.4 : 1.4 4.1 : 1.4 a a abc ab October 0.21:0.09 0.25:0.14 4.4:1.1 41:10 a a abc ab April, 2004 0.27 : 0.01 0.36 _+_ 0.13 5.6 : 0.6 5.6 : 0.6 a a be b May 0.22 : 0.14 0.39 : 0.28 4.3 : 1.9 4.0 : 1.4 a a abc ab June 0.12 : 0.08 0.27 : 0.22 3.0 : 1.4 3.0 : 1.4 a a a a July 0.12:0.07 0.21:0.15 51:10 42:08 a a c ab * Mean : SD. T Means followed by the same letter within the same column are not significantly different from each other. Table 12. Mean : SD of Brillouin’s diversity and evenness and species richness and adjusted species richness for parasite infracommunities of for the 2002 cohort of juvenile Lepomis macrochirus from Three Lakes 11, Michigan by month. 100 Brillouin’s Brillouin’s Species Adjusted Diversity Evenness Richness Species Richness June, 2003 0.22 : 0.16“ 0.45 : 0.17 3.0 : 1.4 3.0 : 1.4 313‘" ab ab abc July --I - - - August 0.03 : 0.07 0.04 : 0.09 1.8 : 0.4 1.2 : 0.4 a a a a September 0.14 : 0.06 0.37 : 0.18 2.7 : 0.8 2.5 : 0.7 b b a b October 0.16 : 0.09 0.39 : 0.21 2.7 : 1.1 2.7 : 1.1 b b a be April, 2004 0.20 : 0.11 0.46 : 0.24 2.8 : 1.2 2.8 : 1.2 b b a be May 0.14 : 0.11 0.40 : 0.30 2.3 : 1.0 2.2 : 1.0 b b a ab June 0.08 : 0.08 0.19 : 0.15 2.3 : 1.0 2.2 : 0.9 a a ab b July 0.11: 0.07 0.20 : 0.12 4.3 : 1.4 3.6 : 1.0 ab ab b c * Mean : SD. T Means followed by the same letter within the same column are not significantly different fiom each other. 1 Indicates no fish were examined Table 13. Mean : SD of Brillouin’s diversity and evenness and species richness and adjusted species richness for parasite infracommunities of for the 2003 cohort of juvenile Lepomis macrochirus from Three Lakes 11, Michigan by month. 101 Table 14. Prevalence, mean abundance : SD (maximum) and site of infection of parasites of 117 juvenile Lepomis macrochirus from Gull Lake, Michigan by year. 102 Sampling Year Parasite 2003 2004 Site of Infection a n=54 n=65 Actinocleidus sp. 4% T 3% Gills Anchoradiscus sp. 2% 6% Gills Monogenea sp. 0% 2% Gills Trematoda Azygia sp. 0% 6% Stomach, Ceca, - 0.1 : 0.2 Intestine - (1) Captogonimus sp. * 93% 100% Muscle, Cartilage, 50.2 : 50.31 45.0 : 42.2 Brain, Gills, (216) (214) Mesenteries Diplostomum sp. * 4% 74% Vitreous Humor <0.1:0.1 37:52 (1) (29) Neascus sp. * 13% 22% Muscle, 0.3 : 1.3 0.8 : 2.1 Mesenteries, Kidney (9) (12) Posthodr'plostomum 33% 80% Liver, Kidney, minimum" 0.8 : 2.6 2.6 : 2.5 Cartilage, Gills, (19) (11) Mesenteries, Gonad Cestoda Proteocephalus 2% 6% Liver, Mesenteries, ambloplitis“ <0.l : 0.1 0.1 : 0.2 Gills (1) (1) Table 14. 103 qulobothrium 0% 2% Liver, Mesenteries globuliforme * -- <0.l : 0.1 -- (1) Nematoda Spinitectus sp. 22% 20% Intestine 0.5 :13 0.2 i 0.5 (7) (2) Acanthocephala Leptorhynchoides 4% 14% Intestine thecatus <01 3: 0.2 <0.1 j; 0.2 (1) (1) Leptorlo’nchoides 6% 28% Liver, Mesenteries thecatus“ 0.1 i 0.4 0.1 i 0.3 (2) (1) Neoechinorlynchus 2% 1% Liver cylimb'atus" <0.l : 0.1 <0.] i 0.1 (1) (1) Pomphorhynchus 67% 20% Intestine bulbocolli 1.6 i 1.6 0.2 10.6 (5) (3) Protozoa Myxobolus sp. 4% 2% Gills T richodina sp. 2% 2% Gills _Table 14 (con’t). * Larval or immature stage T Prevalence 1 Mean abundance : SD (maximum) 104 Table 15. Prevalence, mean abundance : SD (maximum) and site of infection of parasites of 86 juvenile Micropterus salmoides from Gull Lake, Michigan. lOS Parasite Site of Infection Monogenea Monogene sp. A 1%1' Gills Monogenea sp. 9% Gills Trematoda Azygr'a sp. 17% Stomach, Ceca, 0.4:].41: Intestine (10) C linostomum sp. * 1% >01: 0.1 (1) Coptogonimus' sp. 33% Stomach, Ceca, 11.4: 39.1 Intestine (281) Coptogonimus sp.* 83% Muscle, Cartilage, 16.0: 28.0 Brain, Gills, (136) Mesenteries Diplostomum sp. * 3% Vitreous Humor >0. 1: 0.2 (1) Neascus sp.* 7% Muscle, 0.3: 1.8 Mesenteries, (16) Kidney Posthodiplostomum 7% Liver, Kidney, minimum“ 0.1: 0.3 Cartilage, Gills, (1) . Mesenteries Cestoda Proteocephalus 6% Liver, Mesenteries, ambloplitis“ 0.1_+_ 0.4 Gonad (2) Table 15. Nematoda Carnallanus sp.* Spinitectus sp. Acanthocephala Leptorhynchoides thecatus Leptorhynchoides thecatus“ Neoechinorhynchus cylincb’atus Pomphorhynchus bulbocolli Protozoa Myxobolus sp. Trichodina sp. 47% 2.7: 5.1 (26) 10% 0.4: 2.1 (13) 19% 0.4: 1.3 (10) 27% 0.5: 1.3 (10) 13% 0.2: 0.6 (3) 72% 5.8: 6.9 (28) 6.9% 17.4% Intestine, Ceca, Stomach Intestine, Ceca, Stomach Intestine Mesenteries, Liver Intestine Intestine, Mesenteries, Muscle Gills Gills Table 15 (con’t). * Indicates larval stage T Prevalence I Mean abundance : SD (maximum) Sampling Year 2003 2004 Brillouin’s diversity 0.10 i 0.09 0.20 i 0.12 (0-0.296) (0-0.46) Brillouin’s evenness 0.25 i 0.23 0.39 i 0.21 (0-0.90) (0-0.84) Species Richness 2.5 3; 1.1 3.6 i 1.2 (0-5) (1-7) Adjusted Species 2.4 i 1.0 3.5 :I_- 1.2 Richness (0-5) (1-7) Table 16. Mean : SD (range) of Brillouin’s diversity and evenness and species richness and adjusted species richness for parasite infracommunities of juvenile Lepomis macrochirus from Gull Lake, Michigan from the 2003 and 2004 sampling years. 108 av. 880:8 a? Six: .= 8:3 8:: co an: ._ 2de eaoagg 3o Ba 85230 109 .man 5&5— Son no 39:05 0.8 was Hobo 2355 .588 ,3 5&2“.va .= moo—«A 085. 89m 98:8 3 «53.6385 .32ng mo magma»: :32 .m 0.5me .Ir, 3n.‘>f"n . . a .t. ., ‘. . , ‘ a} ' V K I .4- v." — b. “'3’ 5: . :“,.£Q‘H .m-Lp-‘w;,--:: ,_ ‘- a? -“ . . .. . . .J 0“ :9 A .H w. are“ .. . www. * I M .... 4w...“ . n. ...»... ......e. A.“ .. v .n ... and «A. wit p .n 5..., 14w. 7:... . p h w. u w Ry. m. J) N)?“ . w“ pr. 4% a!" a L L L. .... with. .m a... ,,. w. b 36 .~ ‘ yr ‘1. ... a. m T- I W. 1... .. w a... m M “' ".."J'iéifl' 4. ni.",n&"‘@i« -‘.In;;:0.4>f.‘&"W€-;n3.’ . UNI-3 ‘ . ‘ a “ .. t-q .f - nip.» . any 3’, .g, .175. mace. 2»! i I’m ‘9‘. Inf, +7.; tocoo moon B :0500 Noon 0 tozoo room. fieg'ik 'l'i (tutu) u16u01 warmers 110 .588 B 3222 .39 33 :5 Ba 3: = $03 85% 8:8 .88: as a 5&8 a no a 238863 as? .m 2%; 58.2 b 0 0» n show co @969 0% Aueo 0 an 9% fee 500 .09 ....9 so a” e00 r p _ p P Illl | I.” in LII I lllh h yrllll r_v o _ A Wm M mo? I. . a w ..o .11 w #lol 42 m n m 0 111 .qmeomE .n mafia 09:3. 80¢ @5on cacaoxfl ,3 33:08 mo ooficgne £5.82 18% 823E I .am mamn_>_>I omEEOcmE a omEomcEj D .v 2% V aouepunqv xsnuow 112 52:22 8 803 85 828 5008 .5: 088:8 33:08 :89 0:0 80:00 .«0 03838.0: 82309805 mmsemeq .80: 8030808 :38— 0008 >282): .m 8&5 962.02 uIOI 20W. 35:. I sxsnuow :0 mum" qsu ruler; ueaw 113 Collection Site 1 Kilometer Figure 6. Map of Gull Lake, Michigan with collection site. 114 803:0:2 6:3 :00 80: 9.8m 0:80:88: ,3 33:08 .«0 00830850 3:802 .n 2:me 38:2 EnuN m. 82.08% I 8288 I .9. 85835 B 3298“: D 3:3 fiOOGSH ~32 5:02 5:800 con—Eocqom emzws< 833 O V) V V aaunpunqv )[snuow 115 808:0:2 .003: :00 80.: :808 00: 00:00:00 8:00:08 :88 :80 32302008 882:3 :0: 0088800 0008 3:802 .w 0.5mm": 5:0: 88 >3... 0:2. voom $05. ..onEofiow .5393 o , . .. . lilir. r . r o , m 1 cm L 04 or + + 00 .. _ m w mF rfi. e 9.02.22 «101 w- ow Wu FEEEQFI m L 1 a. om .. , m + 09 . mm -. , : om? on -1 :Ar oi. mm 0- . 80 116 803852 6&3 :50 was a 00x04 008% 80¢ 826 30.823“. 8008.003: 000 68 030300.805 £50-0q 00.“ 000808800 80000800 0:00.80 20080000 000 80080 483 00.“ 002%, 38030 00855 .0 083m 0200:0000 0:0Em EocOQEoo F. O N. o miaomw em :30! ms: #00 00 fi- “'2 o V. 0 Mann uouueqs ‘0. o ‘0. o “no 117 .8083 .93 :5 05 a $03 85 800 as aaoaomfi 000%-05.m0.m8_0> 05 E353 280830 00380888 0:09am 00% 380380 3888800 mo 8065000 98000—3. .3 0.8mm“ mi.— 40 .o> as... 4... 0m ..0 .n> 0m 4... mi.— .u> .0m 40 ms.— .u> 0m ._._. L: I° -Qo a «A «'a t O O O O hummus Munwwoo 7 a. O lad 118 .006000 00000000 0330 .0 .0600 00: 000.50 0 56, 006000 0060000 0 .8 803080000 600:0 03 00080000 00 005 006000 00000000 .. 008800000 0:00.058 00:: 00 003600 .00 83500003000300 ..00 5380000551|w~ 02000330 0:00:01000500'2 :00 0330000220VII3 ..00 030000090712 :00 0800050030 ..00 2350000005'2 ..00 000w0802|§ :00 0:00:030002Vl: 080050300000 83.0000000030El2 050.002.0080 08002800230000ZI0 00.08000: :00 0::000509'0 ..00 Smfiwllo ..00 0000002 :lm 835.0sz 83880018030000; ..00 0:.800020'm 0.330380 0300300000000IIN ”06000000008 .00 0a§=0m00050|0 ”030:8 00 006000 0:00.000 80000000 080 006000 0:00.000 0 00 000008000 0080 05 80000000 008: 605000, 00600 0000802 802602 0: 0000010 008: 8000 0203000008 0.20003 28005.0 mom 8000 006000 0:00.000 00 008008000 0080 00 £000 00 Ewes .: 08mm 119 .: 030E €80 5080 055.0 9. S 8 00 00 S 00 00 «0 00 00 .0 8 00 00 R 00 00 a 00 a a 8 S m: t m: 2 02 E #8 ...3 .00 t .5 .0 .9 r; m N 0.9.0.: .0 .80 «0.0 120 .006000 0:00.000 23% 0.. .065 00: 60020 0 56» 006000 0:00.000 .0 .8 0000000000 6006 3 00.00000 00 005 006000 0:00.80 ... 0050:0000 30.000500 000: 00 Ew6m .00 0300080: If ..00 0200000000 '3 :00 30.000.002.00V IA; ..00 SMQVIIQ ..00 05000£0h|§ £50005 003000003000003': .050053000w Surfioosgm '00 .0506330 03.002000003000024 :00 03000030002V|w ..00 0:00002'0 .00500350 §~§0000000i|0 ..00 0003002 lm #:0000030 0308302350mlv ..00 535000030le €053.05 53500003805000 IN ”00000000808 .00 00E000m00000 l0 ”030:8 00 006000 0000800 000000000 000 006000 0:00.80 0 00 0000000000 0000 05 000000000 00:: 60E? 0>0£0 0000802 0.09602 .0061— :00 8000 0023000005 0.05003 0:002; 02 8000 006000 0:00.80 00 0000000000 0000 00 £000 00 0&004 .Q 0SwE 121 .2 2:00 30505050030030 2 z. 2. 00 00 S 00 00 3 00 00 z... 8 2 00 R 00 00 a 00 a a 8 2 2 t 0. 2 .8 ..2 0:3 5 5 ...: 9 .0 .0 00.0.0 3 :0 ..08 122 .006000 0060000 0:30 0 .0600 00: 000.00 0 00.5 006000 0000000 0 00 000000000 000.00 .3 00.00000 0_ 0000 006000 0060.000 ... 0000000000 000000500 000: 00 0362 .00 000000000D 1.1 ..00 000803.012 000000000 000000000000050019 030000.000 0.0000000005000002 1: ..00 «00000000000513 ..00 000000210 €053.08 20500000A~0000000~1w ..00 0&05010 .< .00 000300210 ..00 050000.000 1n 0000000000 00000000000010 £000 .00 00§00M03§U|m ..00 000w0002 1m ”060000000000 .00 00000000005010 ”032000 00 006000 0000000 000000000 000 006000 0:00.000 0 00 0000000000 0000 05 000000000 000: 0000000, 0300 00000002 0030002 .00 0000.0 0020. 00000 000000000 0000000000002 0000050000000 on 8000 006000 0000.000 00 0000000000 00.00 00 000 00 E004 .2 000w00 123 N0 00 00 mm mm 0m mm mm 0m €80 5050 000500 mm L mm P 0m h on 0. mm - mm .2 2:00 NN om mm 0N mm mm 0m on 00 m0 - p P r h h - 000 000 .00.000 .00 00.00 .OQ .hw .tN .UF 00 .kwrm 124 .006000 00000000 0000.0. 0 .0600 0.0: 000.00 0 80>» 006000 00000000 0 .8 0000000000 000.000 .3 00000000 00 0000 006000 00000000 ... 0000000000 300.0500 000: .00 Ew6m .00 0500000000912 0000000000000 0000000000000000212 ..00 0300000212 .< .00 000300212 ..00 050000.0mwlm0 ..00 0.0%.301: .00 000000m00059 100 ..00 000w000210 ...000000000 000000000000000010 0500000 00000000000000.0010 00.00.0300 00000000000010 ..00 0000000000000le .0300ng 0005000030000000210 ..00 00000000001m ..00 0000000000 1N 0000000000000 .00 00§00M000HG10 030:00 00 006000 00000000 000000000 000 006000 00000000 0 .00 0000000000 000.0 05 000000000 000: 0000000, 2600 00000002 0030002 .0000 :00 0000.0 0000000000 000000000002 000005000000.» 0m 0000.0 006000 00000000 .00 0000000000 00.0.0 00 000.0 .00 0&004 .2 00:30 125 .3 290; 3:5 505: 05qu «v Fe 01 mm mm um 00 mm an an _n on mm on nu mm mm 00 mm «a .N on .0? FmF..vF #wF Fov_.m km ..m..w .mr km? #0 .00 .ko..m..w L26 5.00020 5900— 88 02.“ 5 59:22 .= 00x04 005% 88m 0.530335 0.3839 0zc0>=m mom .«o 00609. 030003 “:60 mo 0w8:0000m .2 053m 2:5 30.0 580.. OVA mm-mm 3-0m muumm vmém m Tm _. . _ . _ _ . > _r n$00.0 $00.9 h o\ooo.ow . $00.2” sagaeds ensued “an nuaoJad _r g m .__T $8.9. . o 4 o\ooo.om r nxéodm 127 00000—0 5mg— 86 02.“ .3 fiwfloaz .0013 :50 Spa «.3303qu mmEcmmq 383% S _ mo 0.060% 03083 0:60 .«o 0wfic0000m .3 0.53m AEEV 000.0 590.. 8A mYmv #9.. mafia 3.8 3.3 vmém m Tm F F F P L F p F p ’ [4F QOOO.O ~ _. $8.2 M _ _ a $8.8 w w $00.2” m _ f $8.8 0 sagoads ensued unpv warned , o\ooo.om . g u. $8.8 128 8080—0 532 88 02.“ .3 9&2”.va .03 :30 88m 0.030530. 300320“: .80»-05..«o-w§oa cw no 8608 Swan :38 mo 0w8c080m .2 0SmE omA mYmv 119‘ AEEV 000.0 59.0.. 0.8mm vmém mNhN VNéN .8 $8.0 _ f $8.2 nx.oo.ow _W_ _r_ _ __ .1 $8.8 _r $8.8 .7 $8.8 T $8.8 o\ooo.on ._ . __'T”_ ._.. $8.8 segoads euseJed unpv afiexuamad 129 APPENDIX I Protozoa Life cycles of parasites in this group are highly variable. Some parasites in this group have a direct life cycle, while others require an intermediate host. The parasite Trichodina sp., which was encountered in the present study, has a direct life cycle (Hoffman, 1999). The parasite Myxobolus sp., which was also found in the present study, requires a tubificid worm intermediate host (Markiw and Wolf; 1983). Fish become infected with this parasite when triactinomyxon spores are released fi'om the tubificid worm and attach to the fish (El-Matbouli and Hoffman, 1989) or penetrate the fish and travel throughout the body of the fish via the circulatory system (Gilbert and Granath, 2003) Trematoda Life cycles of parasites in this group are also variable, but most species require use of a mollusk intermediate host. In aquatic systems, eggs, which contain a developing embryo, are shed by adults in the feces of the definitive host and hatch into miricidia when contacting water (Roberts and Janovy, 2004). These miricidia then penetrate the soil tissue of a mollusk or the trematode eggs are eaten by a mollusk intermediate host where they develop into either a sporocyst or redia (depending on the parasite species) (Roberts and Janovy, 2004). Sporocysts may go through several generations of producing daughter sporocysts before producing either cercariae, which is the infective stage to the fish, or redia which produce cercariae that are shed by the mollusk and directly penetrate or are ingested by the fish host (Roberts and Janovy, 2004). 130 Cercariae in many of the trematode species in the present study encyst in soft tissue after penetrating the fish. Once encysted, these larval parasites are called metacercariae. Two exceptions found in the present study are the trematode Azygia sp. that has cercaria that are eaten by the fish definitive host (Sillman, 1962) and the trematode szlostomum sp., has cercaria that will not encyst, but will instead localize unencysted in the vitreous humor of the eye of the fish intermediate host (Hoffman, 1999) Monogenea Monogenea do not use an intermediate host for development; typically afier copulation (with the exception of one family), eggs are formed and released (Roberts and J anovy, 2004). Once in the water, the egg releases into an oncomiracidium, a larval stage, that swims to find a suitable host (Roberts and Janovy, 2004). All monogene species encountered in the present study produce eggs that hatch in the water into an oncomiracidium. Eucestoda Two variations of cestode lifecycles are used by parasite species found in the present study. Adult worms of Proteocephalus ambloplitis live in the pyloric ceca and small intestines of largemouth bass. Fertilized eggs are produced afier copulation and are passed out in the feces of the fish which are ingested by the appropriate copepod or amphipod intermediate host and eventually develop into the plerocercoid I (Hunter, 1928; Fisher and Freeman, 1969, 1973). If an appropriate definitive or paratenic host eats a crustacean intermediate host containing a mature pleroceroid I, the plerocercoid I burrows through the fish gut into the body cavity where it develops into the plerocercoid 131 11 stage (Fisher and Freeman, 1969, 1973; Freeman, 1973). Ifa paratenic host harboring the initial plerocercoid H stage is eaten by the proper definitive host, the worm again burrows through the gut wall into the body cavity in order to undergo further grth and development (Fischer and Freeman, 1973). In the definitive host, the initial plerocercoid II will develop parenterically into the middle plerocercoid H. Upon receiving the right stimulus, which may be a rise in temperature, an increase in fish gonadotropic and gonadal hormones, an increase in photoperiod or a combination of these factors, the middle plerocercoid II moves back into the lumen of the intestine where it will develop into an adult worm capable of sexual reproduction (Fischer and Freeman, 1969, 1973; Freeman, 1973; Esch et al., 1975). Haplobothrium globuliforme uses a bowfin, Amid calm, definitive host (Hoffman, 1999). The worm will pass eggs in the feces of the fish which are ingested by the copepod intermediate host (Hoffman, 1999). Within the copepod, the egg develops into a procercoid (Hoffman, 1999). When a copepod infected with a mature procercoid is eaten by a fish second intermediate host, the procercoid burrows through the gut wall and encysts in the liver developing into a plerocercoid (Hoffman, 1999). The worm completes its life cycle when a fish intermediate host with a mature plerocercoid is eaten by the bowfin definitive host (Hoffman, 1999). Nematoda Nematodes have highly variable life cycles. The species of nematodes involved in the present study are Spinitectus sp., CamaIIanus sp., and Spiroxys sp. Adults of CamaIIanus sp. live in the intestine of fish where eggs are fertilized and larvae are produced within the female (Stromberg and Crites, 1974). Female worms hang out the 132 vent of fish and the female worm bursts when coming into contact with water, thus releasing larvae (Stromberg and Crites, 1974). Larvae are eaten by copepods and molt twice before they are infective to the fish definitive host (Stromberg and Crites, 1974). Adults of Spinitectus sp. live in the intestine of fish, where they mate and produce eggs (Jilek and Crites, 1982). Eggs are passed from the female worm into the intestinal lumen of the fish and into the environment via the feces of the definitive host. The eggs are ingested by an arthropod intermediate host which may be a mayfly nymph, dragonfly nymph, stonefly larvae or collembolan larvae, where the eggs hatch and larval worms develop (J ilek and Crites, 1982). When an arthrOpod with mature larvae is ingested by a bluegill or other definitive host, the larval worms establish in the intestine of the fish (J ilek and Crites, 1982). Adults of Spiroxys sp. live in the gastrointestinal tract of turtles (Hedrick, 1935). Eggs of Spiroxys sp. are passed from the female worm and shed in the feces of the definitive host (Hedrick, 193 S). Larvae hatch from eggs upon coming into contact with water and are eaten by a copepod first intermediate host (Hedrick, 193 5). The copepod with mature larvae is then eaten by a second intermediate host, which may be either a dragonfly nymph or a fish, such as a bluegill and largemouth bass, where the larvae will undergo development necessary to infect the definitive host (Hedrick, 193 5). Acanthocephala For acanthocephalans using fish as definitive hosts, eggs are passed fi'om female worms into the lumen of the intestine and passed into the aquatic environment via feces (Schmidt, 1985). The egg is then ingested by an aquatic crustacean and hatches into an acanthella which develops into a cystacanth, the infective stage to the definitive host (Schmidt, 1985). 133 :55 58... 20.880 eeeesaaaaéQoooe%eooe%%ae%%e.% ,, _ .. , i o POUIWEXE "9!! 1° “flu-"IN .AEEV ~6ch 200830 3 53:32 .: 0.0qu 00:; 89a 03300.82: afiemfi mo 0009652 fl Nun—2mg: 134 i=5 583 28:80 psasecocaacaasu%%%%eooo%&cae%%ez A805 :«wcfl @8250 3 53:32 60:5 :50 Bob 05302085 32834 mo 0003852 E 5975:: paurwexa usra JO JWWNN 135 9 6 9 I. :55 £83 E0830 QQQSQQQQVVVVVSSSSEZZZZZL 99£6L9€L6£9€|76L9€lrslgelr6 _ .7 , _A,,,~vw_o md . - E --.. :3 ..N h am. , .. fimd , , "fin #md .AEEV fiwefl 0.30830 3 53:22 E 000—04 00E Sow 003233. 050338: mo 00095: Z 2 592mm: paugruexa qsgd go .raqurnN 136 :55 £98.. 28:8» (nuanoévaonoanoznonu6&Q150o@%6010&.?%&~ .AEEV 532 @3983 3 gwfiomE .815 :30 Sow muBoEBn maxufichw: mo £3852 > Kwanzaa: Ac , o pamwexa “SH 1° fl"flu-"W 137 LITERATURE CITED Bailey, W. C. 1984. Epizootiology of Posthodiplostomum minimum (MacCallum) and Proteocephalus ambloplitis (Leidy) in bluegill (Lepomis macrochirus Rafinesque). Canadian Journal of Zoology 62: 1363-1366. Barber, 1., D. Hoare and J. Krause. 2000. Effects of parasites on fish behaviour: a review and evolutionary perspective. Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries 10: 131- 165. P. Walker and P. A. Svensson. 2004. Behavioural responses to simulated avian predation in female three spined sticklebacks: The effect of experimental Schistocephalus solidus infections. Behaviour 141: 1425-1440. Bemot, R J. 2003. Trematode infection alters the antipredator behavior of a pulmonate snail. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 22: 241-248. and K. Whittinghill 2003. Population differences and effects of fish on Physa integra refuge use. American Midland Naturalist 150: 51-57. Bhuthimethee, M., N. O. Dronen Jr. and W. H. Neill. 2005. Metazoan parasite communities of sentinel bluegill caged in two urbanizing streams, San Antonio, Texas. Journal of Parasitology 91: 1358-1367. Brassard, P, M. E. Rau and M. A. Curtis. 1982. Infection dynamics of Diplostomum spathaceum cercaria and parasite induced mortality of fish hosts. Parasitology 85: 484-493. Breder C. M., 1936. The reproductive habits of the North American sunfishes (Family Centrarchidae). Zoologica 21: 1-47. Brower J. E., J. H. Zar and C. N. von Ende. 1993. Field and Laboratory Methods for General Ecology, 2"d ed. William c. Brown Publishers, Dubuque, Iowa. 237 pp. Brown, K. M. 1979. The adaptive demography of four freshwater pulmonate snails. Evolution 33: 417-432. Bush, A. 0., K. D. Lafferty, J. M. Lotz and A. W. Shostak. 1997. Parasitology meets ecology on its own terms: Margolis et al. revisited. Journal of Parasitology 83: 575-583. Burch, J. B. 1982. North American freshwater snails. Identification keys, generic synonymy, supplemental notes, glossary, reference and index. Walkerana 1: 217-365. 138 .1988. North American freshwater snails. Introduction, systematics, nomenclature, identification, morphology, habitats and distribution. Walkerana 2: 1-80. and J. L. Tottenham. 1980. North American freshwater snails. Species list, ranges and illustrations. Walkerana 1: 81-215. Camp, J. W. 1988. Occurrence of the trematodes Uvulifer ambloplitis and Posthodiplostomum minimum in juvenile Lepomis macrochirus from Northeastern Illinois. Proceedings of the Helminthological Society of Washington 55: 100- 102. Cloutman, D. G. 1975. Parasite community structure of largemouth bass, warmouth and bluegill in Lake Fort Smith, Arkansas. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society. 104: 277-283. Cone, D. K. and R. C. Anderson. 1977. Parasites of pumpkinseed (Lepomis gibbosus L.) from Ryan Lake, Algonquin Park, Ontario. Canadian Journal of Zoology 55: 1410-1423. Coyner, D. F., S. R. Schaack., M. G. Spalding and D. J. Forrester. 2001. Altered predation susceptibility of mosquitofish infected with Eustrongylides ignotus. Journal of Wildlife Diseases 37: 556-560. Crowden, A. E. and D. M. Broom. 1980. Effects of the eyefluke, Diplostomum spathaceum, on the behavior of dace (Leuciscus Ieuciscus). Animal Behaviour 28: 287-294. Dexter, J. L. 1996. Michigan Department of Natural Resources, Gull Lake, Status of Fishery Resource Report 96-7, Plainwell, 14 pgs. Dibble, E. D. and S. L. Harrel. 1997. Largemouth bass diets in two aquatic plant communities. Journal of Aquatic Plant Management 35: 74-78. El-Matbouli, M. and G. L. Hoffinan. 1989. Experimental transmission of two Myxobolus spp. Developing bisporogony via tubificid worms. Parasitology Research 75: 461-464. Esch, G. W. 1971. Impact of ecological succession on the parasite fauna in centrarchids from oligotrophic and eutrophic ecosystems. American Midland Naturalist 86: 160-168. and J. C. Fernandez. 1993. A functional biology of parasitism. Ecological and evolutionary implications. Chapman and Hall, London, UK. 337 pp. 139 W. C. Johnson and J. R. Coggins. 1975. Studies on the population biology of Proteocephalus ambloplitis (Cestoda) in the smallmouth bass. Proceedings of the Oklahoma Academy of Sciences 55: 122-127. G. C. Campbell, R. E. Conners and J. R. Coggins. 1976. Recruitment of helminth parasites by bluegills (Lepomis macrochirus) using a modified live-box technique. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 105: 486-490. Fellis, K. J. and G. W. Esch. 2004. Community structure and seasonal dynamics of helminth parasites in Lepomis cyanellus and L. macrochirus from Charlie’s pond, North Carolina: Host size and species as determinants of community structure. Journal of Parasitology 90: 41—49. and . 2005. Autogenic-allogenic status affects interpond community similarity and species area relationship of macroparasites in the bluegill sunfish, Lepomis macrochirus, from a series of freshwater ponds in the Piedmont area of North Carolina. Journal of Parasitology 91: 764-767. Fiorillo, R. A and W. F. Font. 1996. Helminth community structure of four species of Lepomis (Osteichthyes: Centrarchidae) from an oligohaline estuary in southeastern Louisiana. Journal of the Helminthological Society of Washington 63: 24-30. Fischer, S. A. and W. E. Kelso. 1987. Parasitism of larval fishes in a riverine overflow habitat. Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the Southeast Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies 41: 119-125. and . 1988. Potential parasite-induced mortality in age 0 bluegills in a floodplain pond of the lower Mississippi River. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 117: 565-573. and . 1990. Parasite fauna development in juvenile bluegills and largemouth bass. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 119: 877- 884. Fisher, H. and R. S. Freeman. 1969. Penetration of parenteral plerocercoids of Proteocephalus ambloplitis (Leidy) into the gut of smallmouth bass. Journal of Parasitology 55: 766-774. and . 1973. The role of plerocercoids in the development of Proteocephalus ambloplitis (Cestoda) maturing in smallmouth bass. Canadian Journal onoology 51: 133-141. Freeman, R. S. 1973. Ontogeny of cestodes and its bearing on their phylogeny and systematics. Pages 481-557 in B. Dawes, ed. Advances in Parasitology. Academic Press, New York. 140 Gilbert, M. A. and W. O. Granath. 2003. Whirling disease of salmonid fish: life cycle, biology and disease. Journal of Parasitology 89: 658-667. Gilliam, J. F. 1982. Habitat use and competitive bottlenecks in size-structured fish populations. PhD Dissertation. Michigan State University. Gillilland, M. G. and P. M. Muzzall. 2004. Microhabitat analysis of bass tapeworm, Proteocephalus ambloplitis (Eucestoda: Proteocephalidae), in smallmouth bass, Micropterus dolomieu, and largemouth bass, Micropterus salmoides, from Gull Lake, Michigan, USA. Comparative Parasitology 71: 221-225. Hairston, N. G., B. Hubendick, J. M. Watson and L. J. Oliver. 1958. An evaluation of techniques used in estimating snail populations. Bulletin of the Wildlife Health Organization 19: 661-672. Hanek, G. and C. H. Fernando. 1978a. Spatial distribution of gill parasites of Lepomis gibbosus L. and Ambloplites rupestris Raf. Canadian Journal of Zoology 56: 1235-1240. and . 1978b. Seasonal dynamics and spatial distribution of Urocleidusferox Mueller, 1934, a gill parasite of Lepomis gibbosus. Canadian Journal of Zoology 56: 1241-1243. Hedrick, L. R. 1935. The life history and morphology of Spiroxys contortus (Rudolphi); Nematoda: Spiruridae. Transactions of the American Microscopical Society 54: 307-335. Hoffman, G. L. 1958. Experimental studies on the cercaria and metacercaria of a strigeid trematode, Posthodiplostomum minimum. Experimental Parasitology 7: 23-50. . 1999. Parasites of North American fieshwater fishes. Cornell University Press, United States 539 pp. Hudson, FL. and CA. Bowen. 2002. First record of Neoergasilusjaponicus (Poecilostomatoida : Ergasilidae), a parasitic copepod new to the Laurentian Great Lakes. Journal of Parasitology 88: 657-663. and R. M. Steadman. 1994. New records of Ergasilus (Copepoda, Ergasilidae) 1n the Laurentian Great Lakes, including a lakewide review of records and host associations. Canadian Journal of Zoology 72:1002- 1009. Hunter, G. W., 111. 1928. Contributions to the life history of Proteocephalus ambloplitis (Leidy). Journal of Parasitology 14: 229-242. 141 J ilek, R. and J. L. Crites. 1980. Intestinal parasites of the bluegill, Lepomis macrochirus, and a summary of the parasites of bluegill from Ohio. Ohio Journal of Science 80: 282-284. and . 1982. The life cycle and development of Spinitectus gracilis (Nematoda: Spirurida). Transactions of the American Microscopical Society 101: 75-83. Kennedy, C. R. 1987. Long-term stability in the population levels of the eyefluke Tylodelphys podicipina (Digenea, Diplostomatidae) in perch. Journal of Fish Biology 31: 571-581. . 1999. Post-cyclic transmission in Pomphorhynchus Iaevis (Acanthocephala). Folia Parasitologica 46: 111-116. Landry, R. C. and W. E. Kelso. 1999. Physicochemical influences on parasites of age 0 largemouth bass in the Atchafalaya River Basin, Louisiana. Journal of Freshwater Ecology 14: 519-533. Lemly, D. A. and G. W. Esch. 1984. Effects of the trematode Uvulifer ambloplitis on juvenile bluegill sunfish, Lepomis macrochirus— ecological implications. Journal of Parasitology 70: 475-492. Magurran, A.E. 1988. Ecological diversity and its measurement. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, 179 p. Markiw, M. E. and K. Wolf. 1983. Myxosoma cerebralis (Myxozoa: Myxosporea) etiologic agent of salmonid whirling disease requires tubificid worm (Annelida: Oligochaeta) in its life cycle. Journal of Protozoology 30: 561-564. Marcogliese, D. J ., S. Compagna, E. Bergeron and J. D. McLaughlin. 2001 Population biology of eyeflukes in fish from a large fluvial ecosystem: the importance of gulls and habitat characteristics. Canadian Journal of Zoology 79: 1102-1113. . 2004. Parasites: small players with crucial roles in the ecological theater. EcoHealth 1: 151-164. and D. K. Cone. 2001. Myxozoan communities parasitizing Notropis hudsonius (Cyprinidae) at selected localities on the St. Lawrence River, Quebec: possible effects of urban effluents. Journal of Parasitology 87: 951-956. McDaniel, J. S. and H. H. Bailey. 1974. Seasonal population dynamics of some helminth parasites of centrarchid fishes. The Southwestern Naturalist 18: 403- 416. 142 Mitchell, L. G., J. Gina] and W. C. Bailey. 1983. Melanotic visceral fibrosis associated with larval infections of Posthodiplostomum minimum and Proteocephalus sp. in bluegill, Lepomis macrochirus Rafinesque, in central Iowa, USA. Journal of Fish Diseases 6: 135-144. Mittelbach, G. G. 1984. Predation and resource partitioning in two sunfishes (Centrarchidae). Ecology 65: 499-513. and L. Persson. 1988. The ontogeny of piscivory and its ecological consequences. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 55: 1454- 1465. Muzzall, P. M. and M. G. Gillilland. 2004. Occurrence of acanthocephalans in largemouth bass and smalhnouth bass (Centrarchidae) from Gull Lake, Michigan. Journal of Parasitology 90: 663—664. and C. R. Peebles. 1998. Parasites of bluegill, Lepomis macrochirus from two lakes and a summary of their parasites from Michigan. Journal of the Helminthological Society of Washington 65: 201-204. , C. R Peebles, J. L. Rosinski and D. Hartson. 1995. Parasitic copepods on three species of centrarchids from Gull Lake, Michigan. Journal of the Helminthological Society of Washington 62:48-52. Olson, M. H. 1996. Ontogenetic niche shifis in largemouth bass: variability and consequences for first-year growth. Ecology 77: 179-190. Osenberg, C. W., G. G. Mittelbach and P. C. Wainwright. 1992. Two-stage life histories in fish: the interaction between juvenile competition and adult performance. Ecology 73: 255-267. Pielou, E. C. 1975. Ecological diversity. Wiley-Interscience, New York, New York, 165 p. Post, D. M. 2003. Individual variation in the timing of ontogenetic niche shifts in largemouth bass. Ecology 84: 1298-1310. , J. F. Kitchell and J. R. Hodgson. 1998. Interactions among adult demography, spawning date, growth rate, predation, overwinter mortality, and the recruitment of largemouth bass in a northern lake. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 55: 2588-2600. Roberts, L. S. and J. J. Janovy, Jr. 2004. Gerald D. Schmidt & Larry S. Roberts’ Foundations of Parasitology. 7‘h ed. McGraw-Hill Publishers, United States. 702 pp. 143 Sadzikowski, M. R. and D. C. Wallace. 1976. A comparison of the food habits of size classes of three sunfishes (Lepomis macrochirus Rafinesque, L gibbosus (Linnaeus) and L. cyanellus Rafmesque). American Midland Naturalist 95: 220-225. Sammons, S. M. and M. J. Maceina. 2005. Activity patterns of largemouth bass in a subtropical U.S. reservoir. Fisheries Management and Ecology 12: 331-339. Seppala, 0., A. Karvonen and E. T. Valtonen. 2004. Parasite-induced change in host behaviour in an eye fluke-fish interaction. Animal Behaviour 68: 257-263. Schmidt, G. D. 1985. Development and life cycles (Acanthocephala) Chapter 8 in Biology of the Acanthocephala. D. W. T. Crompton and B. B. Nickol (eds). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. 519 pp. Shirakashi, S. and C. Goater. 2002. Intensity-dependent alteration of minnow (Pimpephales promelas) behavior by a brain-encysting trematode. Journal of Parasitology 88: 1071-1074. Silhnan, E. I. 1962. The life history of Azygia Ionga (Leidy 1851) (T rematoda: Digenea), and notes on A. acuminata Goldberger, 1911. Transactions of the American Microscopical Society 81:43-65. Spall, R. D. and R. C. Summerfelt. 1969. Host-parasite relations of certain endoparasitic helminths of the channel catfish and white crappie in an Oklahoma reservoir. Bulletin of the Wildlife Disease Association 5: 48-67. and . 1970. Life cycle of the white grub, Posthodiplostomum minimum (MacCallmn, 1921: Trematoda, Diplostomatidae) and observations on host-parasite relationships of the metacercariae in fish. Pages 218-230 in S. F. Snieszko, editor. A symposium on the diseases of fish and the shellfishes. American Fisheries Society, Special Publication 5, Bethesda, Maryland, USA. Steinauer, M. L. and W. F. Font. 2003. Seasonal dynamics of the helminths of bluegill (Lepomis macrochirus) in a subtropical region. Journal of Parasitology 89: 324- 328. Stromberg, P. C. and J. L. Crites. 1974. The life cycle and development of Camallanus oxycephalus Ward and Magath, 1916 (Nematoda: Camallanidae). Journal of Parasitology 60: 117-124. and . 1975. Population biology of Camallanus oxycephalus (Nematoda: Camallanidae) in white bass in western Lake Erie. Journal of Parasitology 61: 123-132. 144 Sule, M. J. 1981. First-year growth and feeding of largemouth bass in a heated reservoir. Illinois Natural History Bulletin 32: 520-535. Turner, A. M. 1996. Freshwater snails alter habitat use in response to predation. Animal Behaviour 51: 747:756. Werner, E. E. and D. J. Hall. 1988. Ontogenetic habitat shifts in bluegill: the foraging rate-predation risk trade-off. Ecology 69: 1352-1366. Werner, K G. 1967. Intralacustrine movements of bluegill fry in Crane Lake, Indiana. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 96: 416-420. . 1969. Ecology of limnetic bluegill (Lepomis macrochirus) fry in Crane Lake, Indiana. American Midland Naturalist 81: 164-181. Wilson, D. S., P. M. Muzzall and T. J. Ehlinger. 1996. Parasites, morphology and habitat use in a bluegill sunfish (Lepomis macrochirus) population. Copeia 1996: 348-3 54. Wisniewski, W. L. 1958. Characterization of the parasitofauna of an eutrophic lake. Acta Parasitologica Polonica 6: 1-64. Zelmer , D. A. and H. P. Arai. 2004. Development of nestedness: host biology as a community process in parasite infracommunities of yellow perch (Perca flavescens (Mitchill)) from Garner Lake, Alberta. Journal of Parasitology 90: 435-436. Zischke, J. A. and C. M. Vaughn. 1962. Helminth parasites of young-of-the-year fishes from the Fort Randall Reservoir. Proceedings of the South Dakota Academy of Science 41: 97-100. 145 G L llllllllllllllllllll 28 I S fllijlll