[Til-loll. . n 1 2.35%.: . z. .55 .53.. :0 1e ...!.1 - V‘. . d5 2.2.1.» ‘ ghufirn: t as, a...” :5 v. in... at“. ‘ I tflv: {(P:: .1. :9 v v \ iv... 4!: Fitti‘ 35» TE $5.39. ‘ C. Q . . I. . . :IIZ I I State LIBRARY ichigar Unive I“ This is to certify that the dissertation entitled SBA (TEACHING, WISDOM, AND STUDY): THE EXPLORATION OF THE EXPERIENCES OF AFRICAN AMERICAN YOUNG PEOPLE WHO ATTENDED AN AFRICAN CENTERED SCHOOL presented by JOYCE HAFEEZA PIERT has been accepted towards fulfillment of the requirements for the DOCTORAL degree in EDUCATIONAL ADMINISTRATION ' Major Professor’s Signatffe S/M/de Date MSU is an Affirmative Action/Equal Opportunity Institution PLACE IN RETURN BOX to remove this checkout from your record. To AVOID FINES return on or before date due. MAY BE RECALLED with earlier due date if requested. DATE DUE DATE DUE DATE DUE I. i ~. - .7. ALIH it“, (H 2009 050?} 0‘8 I072008 2/05 p:/CIRC/DaleDue.indd-p.1 EXI SBA (TEACHING, WISDOM, AND STUDY): AN EXPLORATION OF THE EXPERIENCES OF AFRICAN AMERICAN YOUNG PEOPLE WHO ATTENDED AN AFRICAN CENTERED SCHOOL. By Joyce Hafeeza Piert A DISSERTATION Submitted to Michigan State University In partial fulfillment of the requirements For the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Department of Educational Administration 2006 EX] ancmi aims for 501 Girou have c percc; This it Anne: Afikm Within ”Sport Giulia afiader ABSTRACT SBA (TEACHING, WISDOM, AND STUDY): AN EXPLORATION OF THE EXPERIENCES OF AFRICAN AMERICAN YOUNG PEOPLE WHO ATTENDED AN AFRICAN CENTERED SCHOOL By Joyce Hafeeza Piert At various points within the history of America’s public education, the nation has attempted to educate an increasingly diverse student population. It has been argued that almost since its inception, the nation’s educational model has been utilized as a vehicle for sorting and maintaining a social structure of inequity (Carnoy, 1974; Bernstein, 1977; Giroux; 1983). Certainly not immune to this undergirding ideology, African Americans have engaged in an on-going struggle with the paternalistic European American perceptions of what constitutes an appropriate education for African people in America. This tension fireled the desire for agency and self-determination among African American communities and contributed to the rise of Black Nationalist and Pan Africanist ideology during the 19th and 20th centuries. Throughout historical moments within this nation, these ideologies have Shaped the African American community’s response to the un-kept promises of the American educational system. In recent times, American public schools have demonstrated a clear inability to equitably instruct Afiican American students. This inability has manifested in poor academic performance in public schools and this inability has fueled alarm within the African American community, which has contributed to dissatisfaction and fi'ustration with the public schools. Consequently African American parents have sought viable alternatives for successfirlly educating African American students as manifested in the African-centered educational movement. But what is an African centered education? In the body of literature that has accumulated, an African centered education has been defined in various ways, as a history supplement of Afiican centered facts, as a curriculum immersion, and as a complete cultural and curriculum immersion within schools. Also, researchers have examined the implementation of this educational model in various settings, both private and public; and researchers have examined the academic outcomes of this implementation. However, there is a paucity of data on the experiences of young people who have experienced this educational model. In this study, the researcher explored the experiences of African American young people who have attended an African centered school. The findings of the study revealed that the educational experiences of these African American young people aligned substantially with the intended outcomes Of the school’s philosophy and purpose. Copyright by JOYCE HAFEEZA PIERT 2006 Dedicated to the Creator «who purposed me for this task and sustained me through it And to the ancestors who have come before me and prepared the way For such a time as this Also to my father, Oscar Mitchell (1932-2000) And To my mother, Deolar Aubrey ACKNOWLEDGMENTS It helps to bring the spirits of other people into your life. It gives you many more eyes to see and helps overcome limitations. --Sobongu Some I give praise to the Creator for this educational journey and acknowledge the ancestors who have prepared the way before me for this task. I acknowledge the spirits of Afrikan people throughout the Diaspora. I extend my sincere thanks and appreciation to Christopher Dunbar, J r., my dissertation committee chairperson, who was a constant inspiration throughout the dissertation process. I also express my gratitude for the encouragement of the members of my dissertation committee, Reitumese Mabokela, Susan Printy, and Francisco Villarruel. My deepest gratitude goes to my best friend, Linda Frye, who endured my frustrations and doubts. She always provided me with words of encouragement and she added much needed humor to my life. Special thanks to Kefentse Chike, a friend who came into my life to stretch and challenge my thinking. Thanks and gratitude to Carl Robinson, a colleague who took the time to invest in my dissertation journey by reading my work and assisting in the refinement of my thinking on my research topic. Thanks to my doctoral cohort and special thanks to Elizabeth Murakami- Ramalho, Benita Barnes, and Matthew Militello, colleagues who were models of the dissertation process and what it entailed and demonstrated how to progress through it with dignity. Also thanks to James Smith, Alex Bowers, Patrick Halladay, and Carol vi CXICIII Creat childr am al. contir Baker. Special thanks to Resche Hines, a colleague who pressed me to stay on course as we approached the end of this journey. I am grateful for the support of my brothers Barry Mitchell and Gary Mitchell. I extend special gratitude to my mother Deolar Aubrey for being a vessel used by the Creator to nurture and love me into my purpose. I am indebted to the support of my children Shahied and Rashida Aquil, as well as their father, my friend, Kenneth Aquil. I am also gratefirl in advance to my nieces and nephews who will accept the baton to continue the race towards the liberation of African people. vii “. . fi ". I h — 3’ 4‘ i... __ h V q‘ a: "- I l "' .Aulbw t “i. LlS'l C HA [Ill 1m DIE ()I CHAI Lite ROI? TABLE OF CONTENTS Page LIST OF TABLES .................................................................................... xi CHAPTER I l Introspection ................................................................................................................... 1 Introduction and Overview 4 Statement of the Problem ............................................................................................ 7 Purpose of the Study ................................................................................................... 9 Significance of this study ............................................................................................ 9 Theoretical Framework ............................................................................................. 10 DEFINITION OF TERMS ............................................................................................. I 5 OVER VIEW OF THE CIMPTERS ............................................................................... 1 7 CHAPTER II 19 Literature Review .......................................................................................................... I 9 Roots of the Afrikan centered Educational Movement ................................................. 19 What is an Afrikan centered Curriculum? .................................................................... 24 What is Afiikan centered Pedagogy? ............................................................................ 26 Afiikan centered Educational Model ............................................................................ 30 Contemporary options in Afrikan centered education .................................................. 32 Independent Black Institutions ([81) ......................................................................... 33 A fi'ikan centered Charter Schools ............................................................................. 36 A fiikan centered Traditional Public Schools ............................................................ 38 Current Empirical Findings of an Afrikan centered Education .................................... 40 CHAPTER III 51 Design and Methodolog» .............................................................................................. 51 Overview ................................................................................................................... 51 Research Design ........................................................................................................ 51 Site and Subject Selection ......................................................................................... 55 Sampling ................................................................................................................... 55 Data Collection ......................................................................................................... 57 Narratives. ........................................................................................................... 58 Procedure .............................................................................................................. 58 Data Analysis ............................................................................................................ 59 Verisimilitude ........................................................................................................... 60 The Role of the Researcher ....................................................................................... 60 Limitations of this Study ........................................................................................... 61 viii CHA ('i' .l I CHAI (It CHAl Flni Ir CHAPTER IV 62 Context of the School .................................................................................................... 62 Introduction ............................................................................................................... 62 The Setting ............................................................................................................ 62 The F aizah Shule - Background ............................................................................ 64 Marcus Garvey Preparatory Academy - Background .......................................... 65 Meeting the Founder of Faizah Shule/Marcus Garvey Preparatory Academy ......... 66 Struggles: The tool of perfection ........................................................................... 67 The Guiding Principles for the educational experience ....................................... 68 A Typical Day at the Shule ............................................................................................ 73 A Typical Day at the Shule ....................................................................................... 73 CHAPTER V 80 Case Studies .................................................................................................................. 80 Mama Mariama, which means “a gift of God ” in West Africa ............................ 81 Kamau, which means “quiet warrior” in Swahili ................................................ 84 Heimis, a name he chose for himself .................................................................... 86 Mama Nefertiti, which is Egyptian for “the beautiful one has arrived. ” ............. 87 Naimah, a name she chose for herself .................................................................. 89 Mama Busara, which means “wisdom " in Swahili .............................................. 90 A sma, which is Swahili for “higher, more exalted” ............................................. 94 Mama Ayo, which means “joy” in Yoruba ........................................................... 95 Nina, which means “mother” in Swahili. ............................................................. 99 Baba Shombay - He who walks like a lion ......................................................... 100 Mumbi, which means “creator, mother of the universe ” in Kikuyu ................... 103 Adofo, which means “courageous warrior ” in Akan ......................................... 104 CHAPTER VI .................................................................................... 108 Findings ...................................................................................................................... I 08 Introduction ............................................................................................................. 108 Educational Experiences Grounded in Nation building .......................................... 110 Nationbuilding ................................................................................................... I 14 Family and Community ...................................................................................... I I 4 Educational Experiences for developing their Cultural Knowledge and Identity .. 117 Cultural Proficiency ............................................................................................ 11 7 Positive Self-Concept ......................................................................................... 122 Expectations for Greatness. ............................................................................... 126 Higher Order Thinking. ..................................................................................... 130 Educational experience that cultivated the principles of self-advocacy ................. 132 Activism. ............................................................................................................. 133 Student Agency ................................................................................................... 1 3 6 Educational experience that developed their personhood ....................................... 139 Spirituality .......................................................................................................... 13 9 Rites-of-Passage ................................................................................................. 142 Life Values ......................................................................................................... 148 ix CHM Di Rel APPE AP] AP/ AP! D REFE Not all had a great experience ................................................................................. 156 In summary ............................................................................................................. 163 CHAPTER VII .................................................................................... 167 Discussion and Recommendations .............................................................................. I 6 7 Introduction ............................................................................................................. 167 The Afrikan Centered Educational Experience ...................................................... 167 Challenges and Tensions of the Afrikan Centered Educational Experience .......... 170 How is this Educational Experience Manifested? .................................................. 174 Concerns that Arose from the Afiikan Centered Educational Experience ............. 176 Diflerent home culture. ....................................................................................... 177 All That Afrikan Stuff. ........................................................................................ 1 79 Can these Educational Benefits be attained in Public Schools? ............................. 181 Maybe .................................................................................................................. 181 Maybe Not .......................................................................................................... 183 Recommendations ................................................................................................... 1 85 Future Research ...................................................................................................... 188 Retrospection .............................................................................................................. 16 7 APPENDICES 194 APPENDIX A .............................................................................................................. 195 APPROVAL LETTER FROM THE UNIVERSITY COMMITTEE ON RESEARCH INVOLVING HUMAN SUBJECTS ................................................ 195 APPENDIX B .............................................................................................................. I97 CONSENT FORM .................................................................................................. 197 APPENDIX C .............................................................................................................. 200 INTERVIEW PROTOCOLS .................................................................................. 200 Protocol Questions for Afiican American students who attended an Afiican- centered school .................................................................................................... 201 Protocol Questions for the parents of African American young people who attended an African-centered school. .................................................................. 202 Protocol Questions for African American Administrator at the African-centered school .................................................................................................................. 203 REFERENCES 204 LIST OF TABLES Table Page 1.1 Assumptions that Guide Afrocentric Research and Theory ......................... 12 2.1 Characteristics of the Studies on Afrikan centered education outcomes ........... 43 5.1 Participant, parent, graduation year and gender ....................................... 80 xi that 11‘ Simil. rescar blflSfiN rcscar to an .- [his pr rehab} and in When justice Black Enron ‘5 natii and bu the 32C SCI100] phIIOSIJ edUCaij CHAPTER I Introspection The Afrocentric research paradigm that I chose to employ in this study requires that the researcher undergoes introspection before entering into the research process. Similar to other research paradigms, the Afrocentric research paradigm requires the researcher to examine his/her philosophical stance which encompasses assumptions, biases, and beliefs concerning the phenomenon under study prior to engaging in the research process. The objective of this introspection is “to ascertain what obstacles exist to an Afrocentric method in the researcher’s own mind” (Asante, 1990, p. 27). Through this process the researcher increases the likelihood that the research undertaken will be reliable and trustworthy. I grew up during the turbulent sixties, a period when the issues of social injustice and inequalities were constantly in the news and on the forefi'ont of everyone’s mind. When I reflect back, I realize that in pre-puberty l was groomed in the struggle for social justice for Afiican American people. At the age of twelve, I became a member of the Black Muslims. The Black Muslims was an African-American organization perceived by European Americans as threatening and militant, while perceived by African Americans as nationalist and self-determining. The Black Muslims operated independent schools and businesses in Afiican American communities throughout the United States. In fact, at the age of seventeen, I became a teacher in one of the schools in central Michigan. The school endured for five years but experienced financial difficulties and closed down. My experience as a teacher in that school had a tremendous impact upon my philosophy regarding the responsibility of African American people in providing education for their own children. Malcolm X, a former minister of the Black Muslim move that”i opprc l6“ s" SCl‘lOO contin 6\ em. both. I Educq were I that ti. Were r man} 1 With ti educa: aVOlu: teacher; IIIIOU.‘ With I. COQrdé. movement once stated concerning the American education for Afiican American people that “it is insanity to expect the oppressor to provide a liberating education to those they oppress. It is as insane as expecting the Germans to provide a liberating education to the Jews” (Malcolm X, 1996). Years later, the struggle to get my own children through the American public school system was the vehicle that moved me towards this research. My son had to continue an additional year in school to graduate, and my daughter dropped out of school, eventually completing a GED. My children were raised in a middle-class setting, and both, their father and I were attending college during their childhood and adolescence. Education was promoted as the key to success, and our cultural values within the home were closely aligned with the values of the school. Yet, I could not convince my children that the education they received in the public schools was valuable to their future. They were rejecting the education of the public schools. When I looked around, I found so many of my African American neighbors, fiiends, and relatives in the same predicament with their children. What was going on? Why didn’t these young people see the value in education? As I attempted to navigate my children through the educational system, I became a volunteer parent at their school. In this capacity, I encountered some very uncaring teachers and administrators and realized that my children were not the only ones falling through the cracks. At this point, I decided to quit my job as a Maintenance supervisor with General Motors and complete my degree in Secondary Education. While pursuing my undergraduate degree, a fiiend and I developed and coordinated a four-week summer program for urban children in grades 5 through 12. This program offered courses in Language Arts, Mathematics, and African American thor unhei appml “krdi teachc Klan} nudcn muncd create dwis» cuhuc lVdcn whhti problci “ondx CMHHP Pmpox Public from ll Mala); History. We were able to secure volunteer teachers for the program from the local university. Our program continued for five years. Student enrollment progressed from approximately 50 students to over 100 students and had a waiting list by the fifth year. We discovered that our students responded positively to the smaller class size, caring teachers, and instructions in African American history from an Afrocentric worldview. Many of our students demonstrated academic achievement by becoming honor roll students when they returned to public school. Prior experiences with education, the summer program, the African centered curriculum movement, along with the charter school movement, nurtured the desire to create schools that would address the issues of African American children. Research on the issues of Afiican American student achievement has attributed their school failure to cultural deficiency (e.g., lacking the cultural values needed to be successful in school) (Valentine, 1971) or cultural incongruence (e.g., having cultural values that do not align with the culture of the teachers and the school) (King, 1994). When examining the problem of the academic achievement of African American students from a Eurocentric worldview, I may draw these or similar conclusions. The problem is that the “minority” culture is unable to attain to the “dominant” culture’s standards and norms. However, I propose looking at this problem from an Afrocentric worldview, which suggests that the public school system is culturally deficient for students of color or culturally incongruent from their students of color. I return to the statement that I heard in my earlier years by Malcolm X . . . . Perhaps he was on to something. Socioi for sc be deli acquix to prey Pill-WI I sen'es Girow mobili 0f the t aforem- Milka: [he he comm ,V EdUcai: Sacrjfik and“. l nit: Sp. ”Sage h with}, Introduction and Overview What purposes do Americans ascribe to schooling? Americans believe that schooling is the means to offer all children an equal opportunity to achieve economic success (Ballantine, 1997; Carnoy, 1974). According to the many theorists in the Sociology of Education (Ballantine, 1997; Mulkey, 1993; Bennett, 1990), the outcomes for schooling in America’s public educational system are varied and overlapping but can be delineated as follows: 1) to provide students with the opportunity for intellectual acquisition of knowledge, 2) to produce future citizens for participation within society, 3) to prepare a labor force, and 4) to transmit the social and moral values for the perpetuation of American society. Some theorists have posited that education in America serves as a system of social and economic reproduction (Carnoy, 1974; Bernstein, 1977; Giroux; 1983). According to these theorists, schools do not promote “democracy, social mobility, and equality . . . they see the school as a mechanism that reproduces the values of the dominant social group” (Mulkey, 1993). At different historical moments, Americans, as a whole, espoused one of the aforementioned purposes for education more intently than others, but for many in the Afiikanl American community, the purpose of education has always been understood as the key to upward mobility for their children. Historically, the Afrikan American community has diligently struggled to ensure that their children were provided educational opportunities. After the Civil War, this diligence manifested in the form of sacrifices and determination to create schools which would teach their children to read and write. This desire for schooling, which would pave the path for participation within ' The spelling of Afrika with a “k” represents the spelling in the Kiswahili language and is adopted from usage by the Council of Independent Black Institutions (C181) and this researcher chose to use this spelling of Afrika except when used in quotes throughout the rest of this document. 4 the An conflh result 1 which trans]; Afri Lt: ofpuf deCISli This C’. receix Amen. Wrent Childre- disillu~ altern; 11191 SCI Within “hat j is Ont? .1 hegem. the“ CL moCiel the American society with all the rights and privileges of first class citizenry, was in conflict with the interests of the capitalist elite of both the North and the South. The result of this conflict was a dual system of public education, particularly in the South, which was legitimated by law as separate but equal (Anderson, 1988). Separate but equal translated into dilapidated buildings, poor funding, and poorly qualified teachers for the Afiikan American community (DuBois, 1935). For almost fifty years Afiikan Americans endured this disparate but legal system of public education for their children. In 1954, the Brown versus Board of Education decision declared that this dual system of education was, in fact, separate and unequal. This decision gave hOpe to the Afrikan American community that their children would receive a quality education and have opportunity to fully participate in acquiring the American dream through upward mobility. Today, fifty years later, Afrikan American parents are still frustrated with the inequitable education that the majority of their children are receiving within the American educational system. This frustration and disillusion with the public educational system has been the impetus for seeking alternative educational options for their children. One option that has emerged within the last several decades has been the adoption of an Afrikan centered educational model within public schools as an alternative means of educating Afrikan American children. What is an Afrikan centered educational model? An Afrikan centered educational model is one that provides students of Afiikan descent with an education that deconstructs the hegemonic influences of this society, promotes a positive self-concept, and acknowledges their cultural heritage (Asante, 1991; Ladson-Billings, 2000). Theorists of an Afrikan centered educational model argue that this educational model will produce Afrikan American young people who demonstrate cultural awareness andtxl they It produc adVant some p nation? “Nallo collect psychii are C(r school Providi COgnit. flower, thougi U’aIISm mullip mOdel the ac) Alnka. as put “Don 013% . and positive self-concept (Asante, 1991; Akoto, 1992; Ladson-Billings, 2000). Also, they will develop “the intellectual, moral, and emotional skills for accomplishing a productive and affirming life in this society” (Giddings, 2001, p. 463), as well as work to advance cultural pluralism with a focus on justice and equality (Akoto, 1992). However, some proponents assert that the fundamental purpose for an Afiikan centered education is nationbuilding (Akoto, 1992; Lomotey, 1992). According to Akoto (1992), “Nationbuilding is the conscious and focused application of our [Afrikan] people’s collective resources, energies, and knowledge to the task of liberating and developing the psychic and physical space that we identify as ours” (p. 3). When theories supporting the purposes of an Afiikan centered educational model are contrasted with theories supporting the educational model of the traditional public school, there were obvious points of convergence and divergence. Both models intend to provide students with the opportunity to acquire intellectual knowledge, develop cognitive skills, and prepare young people for participation as citizens within society. However, the Afiikan centered educational outcomes of preparing workers for labor though murky are clear on specifying that Afrikan cultural norms and values will be transmitted to Afrikan children for the perpetuation of Afrikan sovereignty. Though multiple theories support the educational outcomes of an Afrikan centered educational model for Afiikan American children, research does not provide empirical evidence of the actual experiences of the young people who attended these academies. Given that an Afrikan centered educational model has both similar and different educational outcomes as public schools, some fundamental questions need to be considered regarding its impact upon young people and their lives. Are these outcomes for education so different that obstacles are created for young people to participate as productive citizens of the local, nafiona \Vlll'l lili lOOhsh' Sidlt’lfit Afifim Americ student Amerit Schok: beknti 2002 ). higher Educat Speeia] 1999; l diSprQfr Amen-I national and global society? Or does the educational experience provide young people with the needed tools and attitudes to negotiate mainstream culture, as well as provide tools for agency and self-determination? Statement of the Problem Historically, the American educational system has not effectively educated Afrikan American children and this failure to meet the academic needs of Afrikan Americans has been manifested in numerous ways. The majority of Afiikan American students continue to lag in educational achievement when compared to European American students. One noted example of this lag is that Afrikan American students’ Scholastic Achievement Test (SAT) scores in both verbal and mathematics are 100 points below that of European American students (National Center for Education Statistics, 2002). The high school drop-out rates for Afiikan American students are substantially higher than the drop-out rates for European American students (National Center for Education Statistics, 2002). Afrikan American students are more likely to be assigned to special education classes (Robinson, 2004) and lower level academic courses (Oakes, 1999; Hacker, 1992; Kershaw, 1992). Additionally, Afiikan American males are disproportionately expelled and suspended from schools more than their European American counterparts (Expose Racism and Advance School Excellence, 2001). Some Afiikan American scholars, educators, and parents viewed these academic problems as dissonance with the Eurocentric hegemonic structure of the public school system (Ogbu, 1990; F ordham, 1988). Also, some researchers assert that these difficulties fuel the psychological and social deterioration of the psyche of many Afiikan American students and contribute to the diminution of their life chances (Akoto, 1994; Asante, 1991; Ladson-Billings, 1996, 2000). A myriad of solutions have been offered to aH€\Ial Iflaekl aherna‘ into pu liarfie centere tocont educau nudent rmnalh Akoux Centere Amerit Ahflm Ci’merC AMRE Afima u"den. Afihq alleviate the academic problems of Afiikan American students, such as Independent Black Institutions, Head Start programs, Rites-of—Passage programs, Upward Bound, alternative schools, charter schools, and even the immersion of Afrocentric curriculum into public schools (Dunbar, 2001; Ginwright, 1999; Hopkins, 1997; Irvine, 1990; Warfield-Coppock, 1992; Lomotey, 1992). More recently, the immersion of the Afrikan centered educational model into the urban public schools has been perceived as recourse to continued Afiikan American student failure. The proponents of an Afiikan centered educational model believe that this model would not only increase Afiikan American student achievement but would also promote the student’s self-esteem, provide a positive racial identity, and increase the life chances of Afrikan American students (Lee, 1994; Akoto, 1994; Asante, 1991; Ladson-Billings, 2000). However, there is a paucity of research that reflects the impact of an Afrikan centered educational model upon self-esteem, racial identity, and life chances of Afiikan American young people. Specifically, there is no research that appropriates the voices of Afrikan American young people to glean insight from the experience of an Afiikan centered educational model. The lessons learned from these too often silenced voices of Afrikan American young people, their parents, and the school administrators of one Afrikan centered school in the Midwest can assist the educational community to refine its understanding of how to promote academic and life success for all students, specifically, Afrikan American students. Punno CCUICI (POHJ only I. (ShuL educa panh; condh the lit' Puner EdUCu Chane quant OIher achhn ”“Dac Purpose of the Study Within the last decade, researchers have evaluated the impact of an Afiikan centered educational experience upon Afrikan-American students’ academic achievement (Pollard & Ajirotutu, 2000; Ginwright, 1999, Biggins, 1999). Academic achievement is only one dimension for determining the effectiveness of this educational experience (Shujaa, 1992; Akoto, 1992). Additionally, the significance of an Afiikan centered education can be assessed by exploring the values that young people acquire as participants in this educational initiative. To date, there are no studies that have been conducted that examine the impact of an Afrikan centered educational experience upon the lives of young people. In my research, I explored the experiences of Afrikan American young people who attended an Afiikan centered school. The question that guided the research was “What were the educational experiences of Afrikan American young people who attended an Afrikan centered school? Significance of this study Currently, research is emerging that explores the impact of an Afrikan centered educational model upon the academic achievement, educational motivation, or life chances of Afrikan American students, but this research is in its infancy and is sparse in quantity. Several researchers have analyzed the implementation process of this educational model (Giddings, 2001; Murrell, 1999) and its impact upon the academic achievement of Afiikan American students (Pollard & Ajirotutu, 2000; Ginwright, 1999). Other researchers have examined forms of this educational model upon student achievement (Biggins, 1999; Rocquemore, 1997), and one researcher has examined the impact of a form of this educational model on the achievement motivation of Afiikan- Anmr pCOpL educa have; educu meod proxi. experi pubhd Ieaehi 'Ihert the re exidC StudK QUes inno “PIE hnd‘ ho] American students, but none have explored or investigated the experiences of the young people who have attended an Afiikan centered school. This study would contribute to the scholarly conversation on the viability of this educational model by presenting the perspectives and experiences of young people who have attended an Afrikan centered school. Theorists have asserted the outcomes of this educational experience, but, to date, there is very little empirical evidence substantiating the outcomes. The voices of these young people have the potential to articulate and provide insight into the dynamics of this educational model as conveyed through their experiences. Educators can utilize this research to re-evaluate what is done in the traditional public school classrooms as reported by these young people and select proved methods of teaching that can enhance the learning and life outcomes of Afiikan American students. The results of this study can substantiate what is already being done in the classrooms, or the results can introduce new pedagogy for instructing Afiikan American students. The significance of this research to policymakers is that it can provide empirical evidence to the methods that proved effective to the education of a small group of students where traditional methods have not produced academic success. America’s quest to fulfill the adage of “no child left behind” requires on-going examinations of innovations that may prove beneficial to students. Even though this educational model appears to target one specific group of students, proponents offer that this model will indirectly improve the education of all children by preparing the recipients to function holistically in a pluralistic and global society. Theoretical Framework 10 \I'itl their epis how ques & Li kncn PLOP: Wop :hfitr from Cultu: Afrok eSIahj According to Creswell (1998), “Qualitative researchers approach their studies with a certain paradigm or worldview; a basic set of beliefs or assumptions that guide their inquiry” (p. 74). These assumptions are founded upon the researcher’s ontological, epistemological, and axiological perspectives. The ontological perspective is based on how the researcher perceives the nature of reality. This perspective addresses the question of “What is reality?” according to how it is apprehended by the knower. (Guba & Lincoln, 1994). The epistemological perspective is the researcher’s perception of how knowledge is created. Ladson-Billings (2000a) asserts that “the concept of epistemology is more than a ‘Way of knowing . . . [it] is a ‘system of knowing’ that has both an internal logic and an external validity” (p. 257). The axiological perspective reflects the researcher’s sense of values and qualitative research acknowledges the value-laden propensity of the research inquiry (Guba & Lincoln, 1994). In this research, which focuses on discovering how Afiikan American young people experienced an Afrikan centered educational model, I have chosen to use an Afiocentric paradigm as my theoretical fiamework. The Afrocentric paradigm is derived from the theory of Afrocentricity formalized by Molefi Asante (1988) to address the cultural and intellectual dislocation of Afrikan people. Asante (1991) posits that an Afrocentric perspective is an “epistemological centeredness” (Mazama, 2003, p. 5) that establishes: a frame of reference wherein phenomena are viewed from the perspective of the Afiikan person . . . it centers on placing people of Afiikan origin in control of their lives and attitudes about the world . . . . This theory becomes, by virtue of an authentic relationship to the centrality of our own reality, a fundamentally empirical project . . . it is Africa asserting itself intellectually and psychologically, breaking bonds of Western domination in the mind as an analogue for breaking those bonds in every other field (p. 171). 11 under inqui expli. COHSI but st This 1 from this p Table .‘./ / ,../ (Jr / \ SOLR and 1%.. may: FEWC: CQmp An Afiocentric paradi gm is a constructivist’s mode of inquiry and seeks to understand how subjects construct meaning in their lived experiences but undertakes this inquiry from the Afiikan worldview or cultural reality. Guba and Lincoln (1994) explicate the aim of constructivism is “understanding and reconstruction of the construction that people (including the inquirer) initially hold, aiming toward consensus but still open to new interpretations as information and sophistication improve” (p.113). This framework recognizes that individuals or groups make meaning of phenomenon from mental constructions (Harris, 1992). The philosophical assumptions that underscore this paradigm are listed in the Table 1.1: Table 1.1 Assumptions that Guide Afrocentric Research and Theory 1. Reason for Research I Relocating Afrikan people to their “Afi'ikan” center(s). I Describing and explaining the agency of Afrikans in the shaping of their life experiences. I Empowering Afrikans to positively affect their life chances and experiences. I Generating “authentic” knowledge. 2. Nature of Human I All people act from a cultural center and in their own best Beings interest. 3. Role of Common I Common sense consists of intuition and individual and group Sense understandings based on historical and cultural context. 4. Theory as an I Connects Afiikan people to their common heritage. Approach and I Rejects the agenda of any oppressor (historical and cultural Orientation to Data specific). I Seeks to ensure harmony throughout humanity. I Searches for “truth”. 5. Place of Values I All research begins with a value position. I The research must reflect an understanding of the subject group’s value system. SOURCE: Adapted from Terry Kershaw “Black Studies Paradigm” In Conyer, Jr., J .L. (ed) Afiocentriciy and the academy: essays on theory and practice. (2003) p. 34. There are several reasons that I have chosen an Afrocentric paradigm as my theoretical framework. First, to understand how Afiikan American young people perceive their experiences with an Afiikan centered educational model in its complexities, I must analyze the evidence from an Afrocentric perspective, i.e., a 12 p613 encr .Asar their Worlt subn~ Sflud} inlen T€see 199$ IESe: “iti “As of}. SIL i}; perspective that views the phenomenon from an Afi‘ikan cultural worldview that encompasses the cosmology, epistemology, ontology, and axiology of Afrikan culture. Asante (1998) adamantly argues that when Afiikan meaning does not originate from an Afiikan center, then “psychological dislocation creates automatons who are unable to fully capture the historical moment because they are living on someone else’s terms” (p. 8). As a researcher, attempting to interpret Afrikan cultural phenomenon from a Eurocentric or nonAfrikan worldview will lend to an inaccurate account of that phenomenon. Next, this fiarnework acknowledges that knowledge is co-created resulting fiom the interactions of the researcher and the subjects. Rooted in the Afiikan cultural worldview, the Afrocentric paradigm advances the concept that the researcher must submerge himself/herself within the social and cultural context of the subjects under study (Harris, 1992, Mazama, 2003). The Afrikan cultural worldview acknowledges the interrelatedness of all being (Ani, 1994) and thus, promotes the premise that the researcher and the subject concomitantly create new knowledge (Kambon, 1998; Asante, 1998). As the researcher, this paradigm required that I not distance myself from the research but rather that I immerse myself within the cultural context to gain familiarity with the history, language, philosophy, and traditions of the people and site under study (Asante, 1998). Finally, an Afrocentric paradigm requires that the researcher draws upon modes of inquiry that respect the historical, social, economic, and cultural perspectives of the subjects. The experiences of the Afiikan American young people participating in this study must be interpreted from their standpoint. The fact that the lived experiences of this group of young people’s occurs within a socio-historical context of oppression l3 mand: the A? have i resear histor empo‘ and si who i resou: COIIll'l‘ mandates modes of inquiry that seek to capture and legitimate these experiences. Since the Afrocentric paradigm is yet evolving, methods of inquiry particular to this paradigm have not been fully developed (Mazarna, 2003). Proponents of this paradigm encourage researchers to utilize components of the traditional methods that respect the cultural, historical, and social standpoints of the subjects and that generate knowledge that empowers those researched (Mazarna, 2003; Asante 1998; Kershaw, 1992, 2003). In this research, the aim is to give voice to a group who are often marginalized and silenced within society. Ofientimes, this groups’ perspective is declared by those who have objectified them. The intent of this study is to offer the empirical findings as a resource for evaluative consideration of this educational model for the Afrikan American community. 14 Sources Afrikai Sunes.l Alrikai concepi Afrikan: approat Alrika deliter Alrika Aim“ CUhUKi tAsant AIrika aCQUI \. With tr [hack Afneel rehgi- Other i. deterr Kam‘r Ethos by it. 1981). Euro Ghent 0“ 1h, (Kant I .‘Tht‘ Spit,“ DEFINITION OF TERMS A definition of terms is needed to clarify words and concepts used in the study. Sources are given to facilitate further research. Afrikan/Afrikan American/Black: People of Afi'ikan descent residing in the United States, Latin America, and the Caribbean. Afrikan centered/Afrocentric/Afrocentricity: Interchangeable terms representing the concept of epistemological “centeredness” in which the location for the consciousness of Afiikan people is where the Afrikan and the interests of Afiikans are at the center of their approach to problem-solving (Asante, 2003; Mazama, 2001). Afrikan centered curriculum: An Afiikan centered curriculum is a guideline for the delivery of Afrikan centered instruction. Afrikan centered educational model: A model of education that provides students of Afrikan descent an education that promotes a positive self-concept, acknowledges their cultural heritage, and deconstructs the hegemonic influences of White supremacy (Asante, 1992; Ladson-Billing, 2000). Afrikan centered pedagogy: The methodology of teaching which goals are “the acquisition of self determination and self sufficiency for Afiikan people, but ultimately with truth” (Akoto, 1992, p. 91). Black Nationalism: The ideology that people of Afiikan descent on the Continent2 of Africa, as well as, in the Diaspora, share a common heritage of language, culture, and religion; and that this heritage, way of life and ethnic identity are distinct from those of other groups. This shared heritage demands racial solidarity which promotes self- deterrnination, self-respect, and self-sufficiency as Afiikan people (Essien-Udom, 1962; Kambon, 1998). Ethos: “Ethos is intimately related to culture; both influencing it and being influenced by it. Ethos refers in part to the emotional substance of a cultural group . . . .” (Ani, 1980,p.2) European-centered] Eurocentric] Eurocentrism: “The conceptual framework of orientation to reality (values, beliefs, definitions, rituals, customs, practices, etc.) based on the history, culture, and philosophy of Western European people (as a race family)” (Kambon, 1998, p. 529). 2 The term “Continent” used throughout this document refers to the Afrikan continent, unless otherwise specified. 15 European/European American/White: “Being of, or descendant from, indigenous Caucasian/W est Aryan-Nordic (Geo—historical Western Europe) genetic-cultural origin expressed in discernible/overt biophysical traits” (Kambon, 1998, p. 529). Kawaida: A value system of formal teachings derived from ancient Afrikan philosophy which was introduced into the Afiikan American community by Maulana Karenga (1998) MAAF A: Kiswahili term that means “disaster”, (Ani, 1989) “It refers to the terroristic interruption of Afiikan civilization that was occasioned by European and Arab slavery and cultural aggression” (Hilliard, 1997). Nguzo Saba Principles: These are seven principles of values associated with the Kawaida faith. They consist of the principles of l). Umoja — unity; 2) Kujichagulia — self-determination; 3) Ujima — collective work and responsibility; 4) Ujamaa — cooperative Economics; 5) Nia — purpose; 6) Kuumba — creativity; and 7) Imani —— faith (Karenga, 1998). Pan Afrikanism: The ideology that Afrikans on the Continent of Afiica and throughout the Diaspora Should unite against the European colonialism and white supremacy (Moses, 1962) SBA: A Kemetic term which means “teaching, learning, wisdom, and study or collective deep thought” (Hilliard, 1997, p.6). Worldview: “Worldview represents the distinct unifying cosmological, ontological, epistemological and axiological principles representing a racial-cultural group’s natural cultural orientation, outlook or perspective on and the construction of reality” (Kambon, 1998,p.120) l6 Afn stru Giv Am N63 The deiu for < met and Stud lriar IESc and Pro: nan. IDSP OVERVIEW OF THE CHAPTERS Chapter 2 presents a review of the literature on Afrikan centered education. The Afrikan centered educational movement did not arbitrarily happen, but emerged fi'om the struggle of Afiikan Americans against an unjust and oppressive society in America. Given is an overview of the historical moments and key players that shaped the Afiikan American determination to provide an alternative educational model for their children. Next, this chapter details how this educational model is manifested in various school settings for educating Afrikan American students. Finally, the current empirical findings are examined that identify academic and social outcomes for this educational model. In Chapter 3, the qualitative design utilized in this research project is discussed. The rationale for choosing a multiple case study design is explained. Also, this chapter details and explain how data was collected as well as the rationale behind the decisions for site selection, subject selection and sampling procedures. Further, in this chapter the methods utilized to collect data, such as, participant observations, interviews, artifacts and life narratives are explicated and why these methods are most appropriate for this study. Next, the methods for ensuring the trustworthiness of the data through triangulation are detailed. This chapter concludes with reflections on the role of the researcher in this study and points out the limitations of this study. In Chapter 4, I introduced the director and founder of the school in this study. Through her narrative, the school is contextualized Within the political, social, cultural and historical moments of its creation and development. In Chapter 5, I offered the profiles of the parents and the participants in this study. The parents profile frames the narratives of each participant, providing insight into the familial influences which were instrumental in determining the educational location of the participants. 17 th {0; bu cu. ten diSI mo fun The findings from the data analysis are presented in Chapter 6. The findings are the results of a thematic analysis of the young people’s experience in attending an Afrikan centered school as interpreted through the flame of the three documents which delineate the outcomes of the educational experience. The frame provides four outcomes for the educational experience, they are as follows: 1) Outcomes grounded in nation building, 2) Outcomes cultivating cultural knowledge and identity, 3) Outcomes cultivating the principles of self-advocacy, and 4) Outcomes developing their personhood. In Chapter 7, the discussion of the findings is presented and recommendations are given for future research. The discussion attempted to highlight the challenges and tensions of the educational experience of the participants who attended the Shule. In the discussion, I offer considerations for implementing an Afrikan centered educational model within traditional public schools settings. Finally, I make recommendations for further research in this area of study. 18 Am I I [I 1. Ire} An W0 l edu desi ast- edu CHAPTER 11 Literature Review Historically, education has been highly prized and sought after by Afrikans in America. As this nation fought for its independence, Afiikans perceived education as the key which would open doors, allowing one the right to participate as an equal within America society. In the South, it was perceived as a forbidden fruit that once partaken would enlighten the mind and release the body into liberty. These perceptions of education fueled the desires of Afrikans, both free and enslaved, to possess it. Yet, their desires were confronted with the realities of their experiences in the North and the South as they attempted to attain access to an education. For Afrikan Americans in America, achieving an equitable and excellent education has always been synonymous with struggle. Historically, the European American concept of a suitable education for Afrikan Americans was at odds with the Afrikan Americans concepts of the appropriate education for their liberation. In the midst of these experiences, the roots of the Afiikan centered educational movement were developing. Utilizing the related literature, a brief historical overview of the origins of the Afrikan centered educational movement is presented. A definition of an Afiikan centered educational model is defined drawing from the theorists of an Afiikan centered educational model. Next, an examination of contemporary Afrikan centered educational options for Afiikan Americans in schools is reviewed and finally the current empirical findings on the viability of an Afiikan centered educational model within schools are examined. Roots of the Afiikan centered Educational Movement 19 cc pr ex co Ar Int 19‘ it 51 its 1 the) Nat: Afri colo phi! The Afrikan centered educational movement in the United States was the collective and self-determined efforts of Afrikans in America, both free and enslaved, to provide education for themselves and their children. This educational model, which existed in a rough structure in the 17‘”I and 18th centuries, was perceived as a necessary component in the drive towards liberation, freedom and independence of Afrikans in America. It is the consensus of current research on Afrikan centered education that this movement has it roots in Black Nationalism and Pan Afiikanism (Asante, 1991; Akoto, 1992; Ginwright, 2004). EU. Essien—Udom (1962) defines Black Nationalism as “the belief of a group that it shares, or ought to share, a common heritage of language, culture and religion; and that its heritage, way of life and ethnic identity are distinct fi'om those of other groups . . . that they ought to rule themselves and shape their own destinies” (p. 20). The Black Nationalist movement is integral to Pan Afi'ikanism. Pan Afiikanism is the belief that Afrikans on the Afiikan Continent and in the Diaspora should unite against European colonialism and white supremacy (Moses, 1978). The aforementioned ideology was the philosophical guide that drove the Afrikan centered educational movement. Essien-Udom (1962), Moses (1978), and Redkey (1969) have documented the genesis of the Black Nationalist and Pan Afiikanist ideology with Paul Cuffe, a free born Afiikan in America in 1815. Despite being a free Afiikan ship owner in New Bedford, Massachusetts, Cuffe had become disillusioned with America’s hypocrisy in keeping Afiikans enslaved while ringing the bells for their own liberation fi-om England. He founded the Friendly Society for the Emigration of Free Negroes from America and using his personal firnds took 38 Afiikan Americans to Sierre Leone (Clarke, 1994). 20 ITI( As upl oft Afr. thos lion 58p .4 pmr baSt' age: “as. Earl Martin R. Delany, also a Black Nationalist and Pan Afiikanist during the mid-19th century, championed the establishment of a state by Afrikan Americans in the Niger Valley. In fact, he was instrumental in negotiating an agreement with several Afrikan kings for this project (Clarke, 1994). During the late 19th and early 20th centuries, there were other Afrikan Americans who articulated the Black Nationalist and Pan Afiikan ideologies, such as Bishop Henry McNeal Turner, Alexander Crummerll, and W.E.B. DuBois. However, the most influential proponent of the Black Nationalist and Pan Afrikan movements was Marcus Garvey, who through the Universal Negro Improvement Association (UNIA), advocated self-determination and the economic, social, and political uplift of Afiikan people in America and in the Diaspora. He preached the “confraternity of the Brotherhood” between all Afiikans. Garvey also espoused the reclamation of Afi'ika, which was established in this chant of UNTA members, “Africa for the Afiicans, those at home and those abroa ” (Maglangbayan, 1972, p. 21). In the 19303, Elijah Muhammad inherited Black Nationalism and Pan Afrikanism from the Garveyites (Ginwright, 2004). Muhammad advocated separate schools and a separate nation for Afrikan Americans within America Like Garvey, Muhammad was a proponent of Afiikan Americans educating their own and establishing their own financial base. As Muhammad Was organizing Afrikan Americans towards self-determination and agency, national unrest gave rise to the Black Power and Civil Rights Movements. The decade of the 19603 was wrought with racial and 'civil unrest and this unrest was manifested in various degrees of protest through sit-ins, boycotts, marches and riots. Early in this decade, the Black Power ideology, which espoused racial pride and group solidarity, began to spread throughout the Afiikan American communities as a result of 21 rel set U: A t; mic Am raci con excl on c dep: trad and dep; Ihei Afr; insi‘ 4),, the struggle against America’s racist and oppressive social structure. Karenga (1988) referred to this decade as the period in which people of Afiikan descent made the “most severe and successful theoretical and practical criticism of the structure and content of US. society” (p. 125). Ginwright (2004) posited that Black Nationalism and Pan Afiikanism undergirded the ideology of the Black Power movement which placed Afrika as the nexus of the political and cultural agenda for Afrikan Americans. In the midst of the Black Power movement, students on major college and university campuses across the nation were critiquing these institutions of learning as microcosms of the larger racist society (Karenga, 1988). Students, both Afiikan American and European American believed that these educational institutions promoted racism through the exploitation and oppression of people of color. Karenga (1988) contends that this exploitation of people of color was accomplished by their purposeful exclusion from knowledge, wealth, and power. Subsequently, Afiikan American students on college and university campuses began to demand the establishment of Black Studies departments that offered courses expounding the Black experience. They “charged that traditional disciplines had not given attention to Black intellectual experience, culture, and history” (Okafor, 1996, p. 693). As a result of this student protest, Black Studies departments were instituted in major universities across the nation. As the rally for Black Studies intensified, a young scholar emerged who became an instrument for furthering the Afiikan centered education movement by providing a theoretical framework. Molefi K. Asante, while working as a director for the Center for Afro—American Studies at UCLA in the late 19603, began formulating his thoughts for his insightful work, published in 1980, Afrocentricity: The Theory of Social Change. Afiocentricity is a theoretical perspective of “resistance and agency” (Robinson, 2004, p. 22 104) and. conn desu that. wluh thelfi ands A fro IAUR Upor PYOD Oll’cr lite} 104) and is a term that is often used interchangeably with Afiikan centered, Afi'ocentric and A fricentricity. The ideologies of Black Nationalism (i.e., the belief that Afiikans share a common historical and cultural experience, and they should seek to determine their own destiny as a nation, race, and people distinct from others), Pan Afrikanism (i.e., the belief that Afrikans on the Continent and in the Diaspora should unite against colonialism and white supremacy), and Black Power (i.e., the belief that Afrikans on the Continent and in the Diaspora should be able to achieve self-determination, self-sufficiency, self-respect, and self—defense through the power that they possess) contributed to the theory of Afrocentricity. Asante (2003) adroitly explicates Afrocentricity as: [A] mode of thought and action in which the centrality of Afiican interests, values, and perspectives predominate. In regards to theory, it is the placing of Afiican people in the center of any analysis of African phenomena. Thus, it is possible for any one to master the discipline of seeking the location of Africans in a given phenomenon. In terms of action and behavior, it is a devotion to the idea that what is in the best interest of Afiican consciousness is at the heart of ethical behavior. Finally, Afrocentricity seeks to enshrine the idea that blackness itself is a trope of ethics. Thus, to be black is to be against all forms of oppression, racism, classism, homophobia, patriarchy, child abuse, pedophilia, and white racial domination (p. 2). Contrary to critics’ arguments, Afrocentricity is not an attempt by Afrikan American Supremacists, Separatists, or Nationalists to impose an Afrikan world-view upon others (Schlesinger, 1992; Ravitch, 1991). The theory of Afiocentricity does not promote a position of superiority in which it disaffirms other groups’ perspectives but offers an alternative way of viewing phenomena. Afrocentrism theoretically challenges the Eurocentric perspective in three ways: First, it questions the imposition of the White supremacist view as universal and/or classical. Second, it demonstrates the indefensibility of racist theories that assault multiculturalism and pluralism. Finally, it projects a humanistic and 23 at CL ed III ins est: witl OYe Edi. Inte fac i The. Ihe i pluralistic viewpoint by articulating Afrocentricity as a valid, nonhegemonic perspective (Asante, 1991, p.173). Theorists of Afrocentricity insist that an Afrikan centered educational model is the most appropriate educational model for children of color, specifically, Afiikan American children (Asante, 1991; Lee, 1992, Akoto, 1992; Shujaa, 1992). These theorists adamantly maintain that this educational model is the result of an Afrikan centered curriculum which is delivered utilizing Afrikan centered pedagogy (Akoto, 1992; Lee, 1992; Asante, 1991). In this next section, the components of an Afiikan centered educational model will be presented and elucidated. What is an A fi'ikan centered Curriculum? An Afiikan centered curriculum is a guideline for the delivery of Afrikan centered instruction. One prominent characteristic of an Afrikan centered curriculum is that it was established upon the theory of Afrocentricity. Although Molefi K. Asante was credited with forrnalizing the concept of Afi'ocentricity, the genesis of the Afrikan centered educational movement preceded Asante. During the 19603, the Black Nationalist and Black Power movements fostered a climate for agency and efficacy among Afiikan American communities. Consequently, Afrikan American parents began to seek control over the public education of their children that currently manifests in the demand for educational initiatives specific to the needs of Afiikan American children. The increasing interest in implementing an Afrikan centered curriculum into the public schools has facilitated emergent definitions of what characterizes an Afiikan centered curriculum. The theorist, Molefi Asante’s criterion for an Afrikan centered curriculum mandates that the curriculum must “center” the students within their own cultural information (Asante, 24 He Slut Sch. CEI‘. 1992). In fact, Asante has developed an Afrikan centered curriculum guide, which can be located on the Internet. Another theorist, Wade Nobles, a Professor of Black Studies at San Francisco State University and one who designed and implemented an Afrikan centered curriculum in a high school in Oakland, California, defined the objectives of an Afiikan centered curriculum: A curriculum infused with Afiican and African American content must systematically guide the transmission of information and knowledge while simultaneously reinforcing in African—American students the desire to learn and encouraging the adoption of behaviors and attitudes consistent with the historical excellence of African people (Nobles, 1990, p.10). He further states that an Afrikan centered curriculum should fulfill several criteria: 1. 2. 3. Refer to the life experiences, history and traditions of Afiican people as the center of analyses; Utilize Afiican and Afiican American experience as the core paradigm for human liberation and higher-level human functioning; and Assist Afiican American students in the self-conscious act of creating history (Nobles, 1990, p. 20). Geoffrey Giddings (2001 ), a Professor of African and Afiican American Studies, studying the immersion of an Afrikan centered curriculum into a traditional public school, summarized various researchers’ perspectives on the criteria for an Afiikan centered curriculum into five elements in his study: 1. 2. Assist students in developing the necessary intellectual, moral and emotional skills for accomplishing a productive, affirming life in this society. Provide such educational instruction as to deconstruct established hegemonic pillars and to safeguard against the construction of new ones. Provide students of African descent with educational instruction that uses techniques that are in accord with their learning styles. Assist students of Afiican descent in maintaining a positive self-concept, with the goal of achieving a sense of collective accountability. Serve as a model for Banks (1998) “Transformation” and “Social Action” approaches to multicultural education (Giddings, 2001 , p. 463). 25 Kwarne Agyei Akoto is the co-founder of a K-12 Afiikan centered independent Black institution located in Washington DC. With over thirty years of experience with an Afiikan centered school, Akoto insists that an Afrikan centered curriculum must be established on the tenets of nation building and liberation for Afiikan people. Akoto (1992) provides a concise definition of an Afiikan centered curriculum in his work, Nationbuilding: Theory and Practice in Afrikan Centered Education. Akoto, in fact, developed the Afrikan Centered Thematic Inventory (ACTI) as a guideline to the “curricula domains” (p. 129) of an Afiikan centered curriculum. He delineates five curricula domains for an Afrikan centered education: 1) Cultural/ideological; 2) Spiritual/Psycho-Affective; 3) Socio-Political and Economic; 4) Technology; and 5) Nationbuilding. Akoto contends that the purpose of an Afiikan centered curriculum must be “(a) to advance the Afrikan American nationality, its cultural and ideological goals; and (b) to facilitate fully functional and/or exceptional performance in a white dominated American political economy” (p. 169). AS varied as the definitions of an Afrikan centered curriculum appear to be, many researchers and educators posit that this curriculum cannot effectively impact the lives of Afiican American students unless it is instructed fi'orn Afiikan centered pedagogy. What is A fiikan centered Pedagogy? The term “pedagogy” is used in reference to the methodology employed in the instructions of curricula. Fundamental to the pedagogy utilized within the educational process are the values, perceptions, and philosophy of education. In the traditional schools, the pedagogy is shaped by the values of the dominant culture; a culture in which “normative” and “universal” are white and middle class. This pedagogical perspective is 26 M Ill 0.’ eff DI Eurocentric. It negates the cultural attributes of Afiikan American children and attempts to assimilate or acculturate the student into the dominant paradigm. An Afiikan centered curriculum provides the frame or guidelines for an Afrikan centered education; however, the delivery of the instructions will impact the quality of an Afrikan centered education. This instructional delivery is encompassed in the pedagogy utilized by the educational institution and is the pedagogy that teachers employ in their interactions with students. Various scholars and researchers have delineated the objectives of Afrikan centered pedagogy (Murrell, 2002; Lee, 1994; Akoto, 1994). In defining Afrikan centered pedagogy, Peter Murrell (2002) explicates that Afrikan American historical experience and cultural position must be a vital part of this Pedagogy: [This pedagogy should] provide teachers with a unifying framework for how they are to apply understanding of human cognition, learning, and development. . .but also guides teachers in how to situate those understandings in practice—and to use these situated understanding to take firll account of the lives, histories, cultures, and worldviews of children in diverse urban communities (Murrell, 2002,p.x) Murrell’s perspective of Afrikan centered pedagogy is one in which he does not focus so much on the teacher’s exhibiting the qualities of an Afrikan centered pedagogy as he does on the “system of practices” that produces achievement outcomes for Afiikan American children (Murrell, 2002, p. 16). Carol Lee (1994) posits that Afiikan centered pedagogy is critical to the education of Afiikan American children. She notes that this pedagogy is a necessary defense to the pervasive Eurocentric influences in education and society (Lee, 1994). She also iterates that Afrikan centered pedagogy is needed “to produce an education that contributes to pride, equity, power, wealth, and cultural continuity for Africans in America and 27 \\ 3C 16; pl‘ 10 3C ul‘ III. elsewhere” (Lee, 1994, p. 296). She puts forth principles for an effective Afrikan centered pedagogy: 1. Legitimizes Afiican stores of knowledge; 2. Positively exploits and scaffolds productive community and cultural practices; 3. Extends and builds upon the indigenous language; 4. Reinforces community ties and idealizes service to one’s family, community, nation, race, and world; 5. Promotes positive social relationships; 6. Imparts a world view that idealizes a positive, self-sufficient future for one’s people without denying the self-worth and right to self- determination of others; and 7. Supports cultural continuity while promoting critical consciousness. (Lee, 1994, p. 297). She also notes that Afiikan centered pedagogy is established upon the principles of Maat, which is an Egyptian concept put forth by Maulana Karenga. The principles of Maat acknowledge the 1) the divine image of humans, 2) the perfectibility of humans; 3) the teachability of humans; 4) the free will of humans, and 5) the essentiality of moral social practice in human development (Lee, 1994, p. 297). She further states that the cultivation of this paradigm is essential to the “resistance to political and cultural oppression but also to sustain independent development” (p. 297). According to Akoto (1994), Afiikan centered pedagogy “is concerned with the acquisition of self-determination and self-sufficiency for Afrikan people . . . .It is ultimately concerned with truth and the ‘Afiikan centered mission to humanize the universe’” (p. 321). Afiikan centered pedagogy is not about adopting “ancient rituals, values, behaviors, and relationships that have no relevance to modernity” (Akoto, 1994, p. 323), but Afiikan centered pedagogy should highlight those traditions and values of former societies that benefit humanity irrespective of time and place: An Afiikan-centered pedagogy is a pedagogy derived from the Afi'ikan historical continuum and cultural dynamics. It endeavors to stimulate and nourish creative 28 and critical consciousness and to inculcate through study and application a firm conscious commitment to the reconstruction of true Afrikan nation-hood, and the restoration of the Afiikan historical/cultural continuum (Akoto, 1994, p. 325). When considering Afrikan centered pedagogy, several scholars have noted that the valuing system of Nguzo Saba is the foundation of Afrikan centered pedagogy (Akoto, 1994; Lee, 1994; Kenyatta, 1998). This valuing system, also known as the Black Value System, was created by Maulana Karenga (1989) and is comprised of seven principles. These principles are 1)Umoja - unity; 2) Kujichagulia - self-determination; 3) Ujima — collective work and responsibility; 4) Ujamaa — cooperative economics; 5) Kuumba — creativity; 6) Nia — purpose; and 7) Imani — faith (in one’s self, one’s family and one’s people). The utilization of these principles in Afiikan centered pedagogy denotes that instructors must “commit to engage in democratic decision-making processes, have faith in the possibilities of leadership that each person possesses, and dedicate themselves to serving the African American community” (Lee, 1992, p. 167). Akoto (1994) and Lee (1992) assert that a critical element in Afiikan centered pedagogy is the teacher, who is the transmitter of culture. This point is further illuminated by Lee (1992) who notes that having a knowledge of Black History and a love for children does not indicate that a teacher can “effectively teach using an Afrocentric pedagogy” (p. 167). Shujaa (1994) substantiates this point that teachers are crucial to an Afiikan centered education through the utilization of Afrikan centered pedagogy. He asserts the following: Working with and in independent Afi'ikan centered schools for nearly 20 years I have seen good teachers grounded in African-centered thinking use European- centered racist materials to teach brilliant Afiican-centered lessons. 1 have seen European-American as well as some African-American public school teachers grounded in European-centered thinking use curriculum materials written by our best Afiican-centered thinkers in ways that trivialize and nus-represent the content. These experiences have convinced me that it is the African—centeredness 29 of the teacher’s thinking that determines the African-centeredness of the teaching (Shujaa, 1994, p. 256). As clearly expressed by the above researchers, Afrikan centered pedagogy must recognize the cultural specificity of the African American community and its continuation. This pedagogy has to facilitate the holistic development of the student by the recognition of and valuation of the student’s language, culture, and cognitive styles, as well as, cultivate their ability to create history. Now, how does Afiikan centered pedagogy and an Afiikan centered curriculum contributes to an Afrikan centered educational model? A frikan centered Educational Model Traditional education in America has been instituted with the objective of inculcating the values, norms, and beliefs of the dominant culture e.g., European Americans. “Formal educational systems,” according to Akoto (1992), “are integral organs of the nation-state and of the cultural ethos that engenders that state” (p. 45). As a nation-state, America’s educational system operates as a vehicle of perpetuation for the cultural, sociopolitical, and economical structures of the dominant ideology (Carnoy, 1974; Ballantine, 2000). Traditional public schools provide instructions to students from a White Nationalist curriculum while utilizing a Eurocentric pedagogy for its delivery. This pedagogy uses methodology that delivers instruction from a Eurocentric perspective; utilizing the values and norms attributed to European Americans or the dominant ideology in a hegemonic methodology. The cultural and historical epistemologies of the students of color are not considered in giving instructions and the knowledge is delivered from a Eurocentric bias. 30 The consensus by many scholars, educators, and parents in the African American community is that an Afrikan centered curriculum should be immersed within the traditional school curriculum. An Afiikan centered curriculum can provide the guidelines for instructions for students of various ages and ethnicities, specifically for Afiikan American students who now comprise the majority population in urban schools in most major metropolitan areas. However, the immersion of an Afiikan centered curriculum without the complement of Afiikan centered pedagogy will not provide Afrikan American children with an Afrikan centered education. In many schools where an Afrikan centered curriculum has been infused in instruction, it has been ineffectual in improving academic outcomes. In most cases, the missing component is Afrikan centered pedagogy. When Afrikan centered pedagogy is neglected in teaching an Afrikan centered curriculum then the result is not an Afiikan centered education, but an education that is Eurocentric in presentation and results. Teaching history using Afrikan centered facts but presenting those facts from a Eurocentric worldview will situate the Afrikan American child on the periphery of Europe as an object rather than a subject of history (Asante, 1992). Many researchers challenge the authenticity of the Afrikan centered educational models that are currently implemented in charter schools and traditional public schools (Akoto, 1994; Lee, 1992; Lomotey, 1992). These researchers argue that these curricula models do not address a key component of an Afiikan centered education, which is “maintaining and perpetuating the Afiikan culture throughout the nation building process” (Hotep, 2001, p. 212). This effort to promote the Afiikan cultural continuum must be manifested through nation building, the transmission of values, and the 31 acknowledgement of Afiikan spirituality. In fact, they contend that an authentic Afrikan centered educational model cannot be taught within the mainstream school system. This educational model requires teachers who are consciously engaged in the Afrikan centered personal transformation, who acknowledge and cultivate the spirituality of Afiikan people, and who can deliver the instructions with Afiikan centered pedagogy (Hotep, 2001; Akoto, 1994; Shujaa, 1994). At present, there are no teacher preparation programs in traditional college settings that are preparing teachers to teach an Afi'ikan centered educational model. It is the contention of these researchers and also leaders in the CIBI organization that the Afiikan centered educational model that emerged with the advent of Independent Black Institutions has been adulterated and co-opted into the public school setting (Hotep, 2001; Akoto, 1994; Lee, 1992; Lotomey, 1992). Metaphorically, it is like taking a branch from an oak tree and then presenting the branch to the world as the oak tree. Contemporary options in Afrikan centered education With the passing of the Brown versus Board legislation, Afiikan Americans wanted to believe that America’s espoused values of democratic morality had finally convinced its national conscience to acknowledge the humanity of Afiikan Americans by providing them with a quality education and bestowing them with first class citizenship status. However, Afiikan Americans soon discovered that the privilege of sharing a classroom with European Americans was not to be without concessions on their part. Afrikan Americans had to relinquish their own schools and their own teachers. The integration and desegregation of schools did not achieve the educational outcomes that many Afrikan Americans had hoped for, and by the early 1970’s, Afiikan Americans found their schools as segregated as they had been before the Brown decision. 32 The condition of the schools had only minimally improved. Many of the schools in the Afiikan American communities were closed down as Afiikan American students were bussed to European American schools. Consequently, the academic achievement for Afiikan American students did not increase substantially as had been hoped for by the proponents of the Brown decision. Once again, Afiikan American parents began to look for alternatives, particularly in Afrikan centered schools. The realization that American public schools had made little progress in providing an equitable education for Afrikan American students re-ignited grassroots efforts within the Afiikan American communities to ensure the education of their children. Historically, these efforts had never ceased; however, the betrayal of the Afrikan American community by the legal, social, and educational structures intensified the struggle for equitable and meaningful education for Afrikan American children. After the Brown decision, the first schools which offered an Afrikan centered education model for Afrikan American students were independent Black institutions. Independent Black Institutions (1B0 While the Black Power movement was spreading throughout Afrikan American communities within America during the 19603, Afiikan American parents began to seek control over the public education for their children. A significant example of this push for community control took place in New York City with the Ocean Hill-Brownsville controversy (Doughty, 1973; Lomotey, 1992; Hotep, 2001) where Afiikan American parents and other community leaders sought to establish local control of the public schools in their community. This effort was met with conflict and resistance and resulted in community leaders starting one of the first independent black institutions, Uhuru Sasa (Hotep, 2001; Lomotey, 1992; Ratteray & Shujaa, 1987). 33 The success of Uhuru Sasa precipitated the establishment of many Independent Black Institutes (IBI’s) within New York and throughout the United States (Uhuru, 2001). These schools were started as small private schools, after school programs, and Saturday schools. Oftentimes, IBI’s were started by parents who were frustrated with the lack of local control over public schools and the curriculum (Lomotey, 1992; Lee, 1992). For the most part, these schools were supported by the communities in which they were established through donations or through low cost tuition. These schools have small enrollments, generally 50 to 200 students (Lomotey, 1992). The curricula in these schools were often Afrikan centered because parents and educators were looking for innovative and culturally relevant ways to ameliorate the education of Afiikan American children (Lomotey, 1992; Lee, 1992). In an effort to establish a standard Afiikan centered educational model and provide resources and ideas to other IBI’s, a unifying organization was formed. In June of 1972, the Council for Independent Black Institutions (CIBI) was created in F rogrnore, South Carolina (Doughty, 1973). According to Hotep (2001), the mission of the CIBI required has these requirements: [B]uilding Pan African nationalist educational institutions rooted in not only academic excellence, but also self-reliance and self-definition, not for mainstream integration, but for independent nation building, that sets it apart from all other educational institutions that serve the Afiican American community (p. 35). The educational philosophy of the IBI’s reflects the integration of the ideologies of Black Nationalism (self-determination), Pan Afrikanism (unity), and Black Power (agency) in the emphasis of three areas for an optimal student educational experience: 1) Creating a strong family and community cohesion, 2) Incorporating the value system of Mat and Nguzo Saba (Kiswahili for “The Seven Principles of Blackness”) introduced by Maulana Karenga (1988), and 3) By what Lomotey (1992) refers to as “Revolutionary Pan-African 34 Nationalism” (p. 458). The creation of a strong family and community cohesion is encouraged through the tradition of students referring to teachers as in Kiswahili familial terms of baba (father) and mama (mother). Teachers are encouraged and expected to treat their students as if they were their own children (Lomotey, 1992; Lee, 1992). Also, parents are expected to be involved with the community of the school. In fact, the 181’s understood that accepting a child into the school was in effect adopting the child as part of the school family with all the rights and obligations. So parents were found working in the office, on committees, and in the classrooms. The 181’s use the value system of Kawaida, a system of formal teachings derived from ancient Afrikan philosophy which was introduced into the Afrikan American community by Maulana Karenga (1998). Doughty (1973) asserts that Kawaida is both “a religion as well as an ideology” (p. 98). He further explicates that Kawaida provides a value system that assists Afiikan Americans in self-determination, self-respect, and self- identity. The Nguzo Saba principles are values associated with the Kawaida faith. According to Doughty (1973), “as a part of Kawaida, the Nguzo Saba is a describer of life, how one lives, in what manner and for what reasons” (p. 99). Maat is also a value system of the Kawaida philosophy incorporated within the 131’s educational philosophy. Mat is a formal system of character instructions that is expressed in the “Seven Cardinal Virtues of truth, justice, propriety, harmony, balance, reciprocity and order” (Karenga, 1998, p. 37). The IBI’s utilizes various activities to inculcate these values into the daily learning experiences of their students, parents and staff. 35 Revolutionary Pan-African Nationalism is defined by Lomotey (1992) as “part of a new system of education to replace the existing ‘mainstream’ system that is inappropriate for Afiikan Americans, provide a means by which Afrikan Americans can identify with Afrikans around the world, and acknowledge the view that Afrikan Americans make up a nation within a nation” (p. 458). This ideology is fundamental to the objectives of nation-building, self-determination and the unification of Afiikans throughout the Diaspora and is emphasized throughout the educational experience. Independent Black Institutions can be found throughout the nation. However, because these schools are tuition based, only a small percentage of Afiikan American parents can afford to send their children to them. Recently, the charter school movement has provided another option for the Afrikan American community to provide equitable and appropriate education for their children. A fiikan centered Charter Schools The charter school movement started in the early 19903 as a school reform effort. Policymakers and parents were concerned that bureaucracy and large student populations hindered schools from being productive and efficient. Charter schools are independent public school academies which receive their charters from chartering agencies and are managed by groups and organizations rather than the central office of a traditional school district. These schools are initiated by teachers, parents, educators, community leaders, for-profit companies, and other community stakeholders (Murrell, 1999). These schools hire their own teachers and develop their own curriculum; however, their students are not exempt from meeting the state’s educational standards in which the proficiency of students is demonstrated through standardized testing. 36 Afrikan centered charter schools, which have been established acrOss the nation, were created by parents, community leaders, and educators who wanted to exercise control over the education of their children. These stakeholders were not only interested in exercising agency but also wanted their children to learn about their Afrikan heritage. Generally, these charter schools have a small student enrollment similar to the independent black schools and are concentrated in the K-8 grade levels. Unlike the independent black schools, charter schools receive per student public firnding from the same sources as public schools. The exercise of autonomy over the structure of Afrikan centered charter schools has not proceeded without a challenge (Watson & Smitherman, 1996). In one instance, Detroit, Michigan attempted to start an all-male charter school, which would specifically target educating the Afiikan American male population. Research had revealed that this particular student population was experiencing an alarming rate of school difficulties, but state law prohibited the Detroit school district from operating this all-male school and forced the proposed schools to open enrollment to all students (Watson & Smitherman, 1996). These Afrikan centered charter schools have experienced some academic success with Afiikan American students (Rockquemore, 1997). However, the No Child Left Behind legislation has presented these schools with a tension by creating a dichotomy of goals for the school. The charter school community must determine how to continue to maintain an Afiikan centered educational focus, while teaching to the state standardized test. Substantiating this difficulty, Murrell (1999) found that Afiikan centered charter schools often succumb to the pressure of ensuring that students achieve on the state’s standardize test and will give less focus to maintaining the Afiikan centered focus. The 37 *7 end result is “school as usual”, in other words, an educational experience for the student that is no different from a traditional public school education. The charter school movement provided alternative educational opportunities for Afrikan American children, yet similar to Independent Black Institutions, were limited in their ability to reach the large populations of Afiikan American children in urban schools in large metropolitan areas. Grassroots efforts in the mid-903 provided the momentum to implement Afrikan centered educational models within traditional public schools, where Afiikan American students were the predominant student population, most often in large urban centers. Afrikan centered Traditional Public Schools Within the last decade, Afrikan centered curricula have been implemented within traditional public schools in urban centers such as Milwaukee, Portland, Philadelphia, Newark, Detroit, Oakland, and Washington DC. (Pollard & Ajirotutu; 2000; Murrell, 1999, Ginwright, 1999). This model of implementation has been referred to as Afrikan centered Immersion projects. The impetus for this movement within urban schools was rooted in the frustrations of Afiikan American parents and community leaders with the continued failings of Afrikan American students, particularly Afiikan American males. White flight from and de-industrialization in urban centers created urban school environments in which these schools were under funded, and the student population became predominantly composed of children of color. In fact, studies have demonstrated that children of color, specifically Afrikan American children, are now more likely to attend predominately Afrikan American schools than before the Brown decision (Orfield, 1996) 38 For parents residing in these urban settings, options to acquire an equitable education for their children through access to private schools or Afrikan centered charter schools did not exist because of their inability to afford tuition or provide transportation to these schools. Coupled with the urgency of ameliorating the crisis of Afrikan American males as manifested in high drop out rates, high suspension rates, and underachievement, Afiikan American parents, educators, and community activists confronted school board and demanded the immersion of an Afrikan centered curriculum into the traditional public schools. The rationale for this demand was that students receiving instructions fi'om a culturally relevant curriculum would enhance learning by providing an environment in which students were not alienated from the instruction and materials presented. The Afrikan centered educational movement has been in the heart of Afiikan Americans from the beginnings of civilization in Afiika. Since initial contact with Europeans and involuntary sojourn to America, Afiikans have fought to maintain their humanity through education. Whether through education by organized efforts of fiee Blacks or through stolen moments in the night, Afrikan Americans have been determined to acquire the key that would open the door to liberty. When the key did not give them access to that liberty because of the enactment of federal and state legislature created barriers to first class citizenship, they contemplated education for a separate nation, whether in the United States or in the motherland. The Brown decision renewed hope in a “united” nation. By the 19803, however, Afiikan Americans knew that once again they had experienced “a dream deferred”. Now, grassroots organizations in Afi'ikan American communities comprised of teachers, parents, and community members are pushing for an Afi'ikan centered education for their children, whether in Independent Black institutions, 39 Afiikan centered charter schools or Afiikan centered Immersion projects in traditional public schools. The current empirical findings on an Afiikan centered educational model are examined in the next section. Current Empirical Findings of an A fi'ikan centered Education Today, education is still considered by the Afiikan American community to be the key to upward mobility within American society. This orientation towards education is demonstrated by their continual search for viable options in the education of their children. Nationwide, Afiikan American parents, educators, and community have become frustrated with the failure of the public school system in educating Afiikan American children. As a result of this dissatisfaction, grassroots movements have emerged throughout the nation creating Black Independent schools (Lomotey, 1992), opening Afrikan centered charter schools (Murrell, 1999) and demanding the immersion of an Afrikan centered curricula within the tradition public schools (Pollard & Aj irotutu, 2000). Increasing numbers of Afiikan American children are now receiving an Afrikan centered education throughout the nation’s schools. Research on an Afiikan centered education began in the early 1970’s with the advent of independent Black institutions. Much of this research has focused upon explicating the socio-historical need for an Afrikan centered educational model for Afrikan American children (Doughty, 1975; Akoto, 1992; Lee, 1992; Lomotey, 1992; Ratteray & Shujaa, 1987; Hotep, 2001). Some researchers have examined the parental motivations behind decisions to seek this educational model for their children (Dove, 1998; Ratteray & Shujaa, 1987, Shujaa, 1994). For example, Joan Ratteray and Mwalirnu Shujaa (1987) conducted a study examining the rationale that supported the 40 'r, i f fr choices of Afrikan American parents to send their children to Afrikan centered independent schools. Researchers were interested in this decision-making from the perspectives of how parents defined the needs of their children, the extent of commitment that they were willing to make to fulfill their child’s academic needs, and whether they perceived the needs of their child as being met (Ratteray & Shujaa, 1987). Another researcher, Nah Dove (1998) performed a study in which she examined the motivations that undergirded the decisions of “Afrikan” mothers to send their children to Afi'ikan centered independent schools in both the United States and the United Kingdom (p. xiii). Nevertheless, currently little research has been located that suggests that an Afiikan centered educational model in an Independent Black institution has increased student academic outcomes, or more generally, that an Afiikan centered education has impacted the life experiences of Afrikan American students. The creation of Afi'ikan centered charter schools coupled with the demand for Afiikan centered Immersion schools has intensified within the last decade. This proliferation of Afiikan centered schools offers opportunity for greater access to educational choices for the Afrikan American community. As a consequence of the novelty of this innovation within both of these school settings, research which examines the outcomes of this Afrikan centered educational model is sparse (Biggins 1999, Lake, 1996; Pollard & Ajirotutu, 2000; Ginwright, 1999). However, one study that looks specifically at the academic outcomes of Afrikan American students attending an Afrikan centered school was conducted by Jennifer Biggins (1999). Biggins engaged in a five year descriptive study that sought to determine if the achievement test scores of students improved as a result of receiving instructions from an Afrikan centered curriculum. She studied an urban elementary school (K-5) 41 located in the Midwest that had adopted an Afrikan centered curriculum. Utilizing the Iowa Tests of Basic Skills, Biggins compared the achievement test score gains of the students in the school that had adopted an Afrikan centered curriculum with the test scores of students from a school which had a traditional curriculum. Biggins reported that her study found students who attended the Afrikan centered school scored higher in both reading and mathematics than students in the comparable local norm group (See Table 2.1, p. 43). She also noted that the test scores for these students revealed an overall maturity in the area of science, a fact which was unmatched in the control group. Another realm of emerging research focuses on this educational model by examining the process of implementation within the public school setting. Three studies were located which utilized the findings in diverse ways (Murrell, 1999; Pollard & Ajirotutu, 2000; Ginwright, 1999). Two of the studies shall be focused upon here because these researchers were interested in determining whether implementing the Afrikan centered educational model increased student academic outcomes. One study employed the findings to clarify how the presence or absence of various school factors such as leadership, collegiality and financial resources, impact the resultant student outcomes in Afiikan centered immersion schools (Pollard & Ajirotutu, 2000). The other study also looked at the academic outcomes of students resulting from the implementation process of this curriculum, but concluded that economic class affected the students’ outcomes (Ginwright, 1999). Pollard and Ajirotutu (2000) performed a five-year study which evaluated the implementation process of an Afiikan centered curriculum for two traditional public schools in Milwaukee, Wisconsin. The disheartening academic performance of children 42 Hue—o u; . 0:288:82. o». :5 985 on >355 8328 09.250: 9:888 >532. on O5. 56¢ on 5.3.65 rue—2:382? r23. 3. >835? 9.2.2: 95533: :3 macaw man—u 68mm: 368: more... >o5o335: can: ecu—mo 088 moo—Ea Av SEES" 05:8:3 55038: Cm“ no how no mm Kan—o 20 035% 2\> Zo assume Z #088 Ede: 36:0 388 055.1%: (<93 88" 95:57.0 55.2.30: Cm“ no how mm Em: moron: Zo assume 20 3850 2o 035mm 238 Saw: veg." has 2:95am" 053830 $383. 7:.» Em: moroa 2o 3250 2:» 2; 2003 :38. m: .032: Emma; 33:83 05383» 53038: 2\> E25383 39.3.8 2:» 23 :38 Eve: ecczo 252 0:38:33» 5 «<20: "aware; 29.x Homage. 8 no