2.. KCJLTECN "‘ F 1' HE a-‘R E? AR A $30 2% SIX): 3 Q. 35'"? m ' v 08334 Km“ '73 "3.5"“ u L “In: 3 F “TERTIARY ALKY L fEZ‘éf’TEAES a ‘. '\ . . " ‘ 1;, .~. <3 "’-' 49L; 9' * 3’". 3. ‘ ‘ L',"‘\': ‘ (UN HR " N 0 ‘fi\ \1, m 50A. 3 3 .m“ :- g, .bhus I r »‘ ‘p‘ Iv-d .1-‘4 a. . ‘01:: . atavisu—n -, ”/I/W g: “awn. ‘. “1'". ,‘vy Y .‘.L.2.‘2‘.\"~‘.&7'3 31‘;- LIK'I'L; .‘i’:' .3517 ’ . 7,". .23 V ’34A'e‘LAdo‘7 "’ LITERARY CO-F '- ‘2. 513612;”, cik- . 1.; n4 “' l . 1., -.—~‘,.,\Yf-‘1‘ . l 51‘ . )- . , MM». f-vV-thmar : 1‘-“..' \1 A.” ‘ . u .l. .- ...ov5 . v ELR l}. : Lt}. 3%... z; . . , . ‘ asimri fl. 551x . THE PREPARATION AND IDENTIFICATION OF TIE Acmm "IO DERIVATIVES OF TERTIARY ALKYL DEEZEEES by John Hamilton Coleman A THESIS Submitted to the Graduate School of Michigan State College of Agriculture and Applied Science in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIEHCE Department of Chemistry 1941 ,4’ll"§“ ACKIé GULF. WERE T To Dr. R. C. Huston, the writer expresses his sincere appreciation for the helpful suggestions made during the performance of this work. 33162-1 Introduction - - History ~ _ - - Exzerimental Katerials - Carbinols - Contents Condensation; - - - - - - - Preparation Tables - .. Discussion - - _ Sunmery - - - - Bibliograpfiy - ‘ of Derivatives Iage 12 15—19 Introduction In the course of a study of aromatic hydrocarbons Ipatieff (1) found need of a simple method of the identi- fication of alkylbenzenes. Boiling points and other physical constants would have been satisfactory for distinguishing between homolOgous compounds but inadequate in the case of isomers, oxidation could have been used to distinguish between mono~ and dialkylbenzenes, but of course, would have failed to determine the configuration of the alkyl groupings. Ipatieff and Schmerling (2) in an attempt to establish a.suitable means of identification of several alkyl benzenes, studied the mono- and di-acetamino derivatives. No previous study of the nitration, reduction, and acylation of a series of alkylbenzencs under a single set of conditions had been attempted. A procedure for the quick and easy identification of mono-alkyl benzenes was deveIOped. Under the prescribed conditions pure L-nitroalkylbensenes may be obtained by use of a nitrating mixture of equal volumes of concentrated sulfuric and nitric acids. Ortho isomers are present in only small amounts and do not interfere; and the dinitro derivatives which may be present may be readily separated by an ether extraction of the solution obtained on reducing with tin and hydrochloric acid. The mono-amino complex forms an ether soluble salt with tin chloride in the presence of acid; the dianino salt is ether-insoluble. Ipatieff and Schmerling prepared both mono- and di- acotamino derivatives of toluene, ethyl benzene, the propyl benzenes, the butyl benzenes and the amyl benzenes. All were white crystals, possessed sharp melting points, and were easily identified. In this laboratory since 1934 higher alkyl benzenes have been prepared by condensation of tertiary alcohols with benzene in the presence of aluminum chloride. A fairly satisfactory method of identification of these hydrocarbons has been effected in the preparation of the correSponding alkyl phenols (and subsequent preparation of urethane derivatives) by nitration, reduction, diazotization, and hydrolysis. however, the method is long, and not entirely gratifying with small amounts. Since it was necessary, for a complete study of the mechanics of condensation reactions, to establish the identi- fication of mixed fractions and split alkyl benzene products, and since the acetamino derivatives of some alkyl benzenes had been prepared, the preparation and identification of the mono-acetamino derivatives of all the condensation products (tertiary alkyl benzenes) was highly desirable. History Huston and Fox (3) in 1934 successfully condezsod tertiary butyl alcohol, tertiary any aleahel, dimethvl n-propyl carbinol, and dimsthyl iso-prooyl carbirol with benzene to give the empected products, tertiary tutyl benzene, tertiary amyl benzene, dincthyl n-¢ropyl pheny methane, and dimethyl iso—prolyl methane, in good yields. Huston and hinder (L) in 1935 COHSBESGG dinethyl D- butyl carbinol, dimethyl iso—butyl carbinol, dimethyl sec- butyl carbinol, methyl ethyl n-prOpyl carbirol, methyl ethyl ice-prepyl carbinol, and trimethyl carbinol to obtain in good yields the products, dimethyl n—butyl phenyl methane, dimethyl iso-butyl phenyl methane, dimethyl sec-butyl phenyl methane, methyl ethyl nuprOpyl phenyl methane, methyl ethyl iso—prOpyl phenyl methane, and triethyl pheryl methane. A condensation with dimethyl tertiary butyl carbinel gave a product in the expected range, but it was not identified with certainty. Huston and Sculati (5) in 1936 condensed dimethyl amyl carbinols (n-anyl, active amyl, iso-amyl, sec-amyl) with benzene to form the alkyl benzenes dimethyl n—amyl phenyl methane, dimethyl active amyl phenyl methane, di-methyl iso- amyl phenyl methane, and dimethyl sec-amyl shenyl methane in yields which decreased with the approach of tee branching to the carbinol grouping. Huston and Ireining (6) in 1938 by condensation with benzene prepared diethyl n-prOpyl phenyl methane and di- ethyl iso-prOpyl phenyl math Hi approximately 25$ yields from diethyl n-prOpyl carbinol and diethyl iso IOpyl carbinol respectively. Huston and Cline (7) in 1939 were able to isolate methyl diah-propyl phe.n"l methane and methvl h-Jro yl-iso-propyl phenyl methane in 37% and 18} yields respectively; and also small amounts (7%) of methyl di-iso~pr0pyl hsnyl methane from the respective carbinols. Huston and .Jnter (8) in 1939 in tr» ir proof of structure were successful in isolating and identifying the normal pro- ducts of conHommHHoMm n mansaom » mansaom « Henna « baseman _ sadness . .sseaonueg » emosaom . mansaom “ ” madness » hadcsen a peeps “ ” eaosaom . ”maasaomsfi “ haaeeon “ HedOOHs “cm s oahsaoe " mansaom . u madness « haacson « Hoaooae Raw “mapsaowsd « sansaomsa a hopes n caoo " pom a pqo>aom MHBHAHmbqom MbHasamm m mamsa 20 Discussion The general procedure for the preparation of the acet- amino derivatives of the alkyl benzenes described in this 'worh consisted of nitration by means of a mixture of equal parts of c ncentrated sulfuric and nitric acids; reduction of the product with tin and hydrochloric acid; and acylation of the pure none-amine with acetic anhydride. 1: a m- m n so __;-, n ED + n.03—s—ea n' {{QNOVF H20 nu§Q1~202+ H figi—e nuggnnz-i— H20 g R ~‘- 4’ - -’ - th<“i H n RDI‘LZ + (mambo —————-> 12' SD c3t13+ 20 In a few cases, pure amines (para), which had been pree viously prepared in the laboratory, were acylated. Helting points of these derivatives checked with those made by the above method. Fairly good yields resulted with all the products, averaging about 40%. Evidently those derivatives which the author was unable to crystallize possess a latent lattice formation which makes recrystallisation impossible. This is the only method of explaining the resultant crystallization from the oils on long standing. The forces necessary to form.the lattice work are not sufficiently strong to permit latticing in solvents. Ho generalizations on the melting points can be made aside from the fact that lengthening the chain lowers the melting point, and breaching (heaping of eurogens) raises it to a certain extent. ‘3’) “I- 8113:; vary 1. Some tertiary alcohols were synthesiro and condensed with berzene in the presence of aluminum chloride to form the elk l benzenes. 2. Identification of tertiary alkyl benzenes has been made through the preparation f the mono-acetamino derivatives. The tectnique consists of nitration, reduction, and ecylatiOn, and may be applied quickly to small amounts of the hydro- carbon. 3. Fifteen of these derivatives have been successfully re- crystallized. Kelting points and crystal forms have been recorded. 4. Various solvents, scratching, seeding, cooling, and other accepted methods of inducing crystallization (20) were utilized on the remaining derivatives which were those of the tertiary octyl benzenes. These were not successful. 5. Some of these on long standing crystallized from.the oils. however, attempts to recrystallize fron.solvents failed. -_._ VDP‘qi‘a‘Jib '.‘ Bibliosrephy 1. Iputieff, Carson, Fines J. in. Clo . :00. 58 919 1936 I etieff ens Pines Ibid 58 1056 1936 Grosse enfl Ipatieff Itid 57 2415 1935 Ipetieff, Ionnrcusky, Pines Ibid 918 1936 \D 0.1 2. Ipetieff one Schnerling J. in. Chen. Soc. 59 1056 1937 3. H eton and Fox Lester's Tnnsis 1934 L. Euston and binder unster's ThuSlS 1935 5. Huston and Boulati master's Thesis 1936 6. Eueton and areining Hester'e Tb sis 1933 7. Huston and Cline Easter's Thesis 1939 8. fiuston and Synder Keeter's Thesis 1939 9. Huston and Wesson Iastcr's Thesis 1940 10. Huston and Guile . J. Am. hem. Soc. 61 69 1339 11. Organic Synthesis Coll. Vol I, Page 23 12. Organic Synthesis Coll. Vol I, Page 138 13. Bercker Am. Chin. Fnye. {5) 26 468 1.s2 14. E ston and Lnngdon Master's Thesis 1939 15. Huston and Leloy Doctor's Thesis Unpublished 1941 16. Whitmore and Cerch J. Am. Che . Soc. 55 1119- 1124 1933 17. Whitmore and Badertecher J. in. Cher. Soc. 55 1559- 67 1933 18. Unitnore enfl Endertscner J. Am. Chen- Soc. 59 1561 1933 19. Shoesnitn and fiackie J. Am. Chem. too. 51 2335 1923 Beiletein, 14th Edition, Volume III, Page 1167 20. horton Laboratory flecdnique in Organic Onenistry, Pages 147-165 1......" _ l|f§lk|iw Hw'1x. Vil..wl.y.\:. I. . c .23.... 41. 1 11.4- o .0 LL .11. . J 1.... . CIII(;£2..414.!. I .i‘ . .1. ... , riftltii ”airfa- .le.1.. v.2 . u .841. . . I .v‘ng "11111111211111fiflguigfifllfiifiglfifllfiflllES