. .x . .. . (_ x A Hz .. . ‘ a ‘ 5‘9 _ :A «f. c . “I, _....: , . qr .w. . M m ... .e y ....:.M . . _ .. _ Q: :2 :. ... m. .y .— n u . ._.L . . x. . .u x. a . .\. u . , ..! .x _ x. . L ‘ L . 1 fl ‘ h I ...\ _ .p. ; .H . . v. v1 \ (.Snx .. ...\. .....- . .. . . . . ,. .... .. . . H. 1 . . .. ., . .....31. ...).\ 5.2-... ...n... .... ..r . .i. 2.11. 3.1.1.,... 1...... . L ‘Vll 1 :va. (a? 331?: 13““) :4. .114 .«Y(.’./\1vt..:. 5.1...- ..u. )~ w H.... . 131.93.! \ 27... .ot .. \nk...\ \kuv X7. Vakfisfi. 3...? .....T.. .....7 Km .yrnr. .» . h y El {BIBJK .“nil. E.pr\LNu ..L L ..L I. . ... I D. . Vb sll AV.» . L .1 .. 1.- .... ..T. .....muaNQrL THESIS ...: ..‘.\ . 6:.1. FH- ai. .Jh: i. £.~.‘. .uv‘.:x 12.21.... I. w. -.— 2“?! . q . 1m... . .1. ‘1. .I\. :3... .. ...... .... .1...» .l. 1X¢Irllan\:§. ti... {... . .1 FFECT OF CALCIUM CHLORIDE e: ON PLAIN AK REINFORCED CONCRETE. A Report Submitted to the Faculty of MICHIGAN AGRICULTURAL COLLEGE By Roscoe J. §}ack H. Firth Anderson Candidates for the Degree of BACHELOR OF SCIENCE. June, 1924. THESIS 1 .l L; m’. 7‘ 1 A. INDEX. Effect of Calcium Chloride on Plain and Reinforced Concrete .................... Specifications ............................... a--- External Treatment ------------------------------- Internal Treatment ............................... Percent of Calcium Chloride ...................... Effect on Steel .................................. Bond Strength .................................... Conclusions ...................................... 940?3 17 13 . _..... ......_.. _-.—._—. EFFECT OF CALCIUM CHLORIDE 0N PLAIN AND REINFORCED COECRETE. There has been a problem of rapid and economic curing without any injurious effect on the concrete or the reinforcing since the time that Portland Cement has been used with various aggregates to produce concrete. Up to the present date various salts and chemical compounds, which weaken the concrete, attack the steel, or stain the surface, have been tried. While the laboratories were working on this prdblem, the most efficient methods of curing concrete were: first, ponding or covering with moist earth for pavements, and second, keeping the forms moist for structures. These methods are very uneconomical for the present day system of building pavements and structures. With a quick set, roads may be opened to traffic and forms for structural work may be removed at an earlier date than is possible, otherwise. The Opening of roads at an earlier date will greatly reduce the expense to the traveling public and also the expense to the community in the upkeep of detours. It will reduce the contractor's expense; so that, ultimately, the concrete can be laid more economically than by former methods. In structural work the owner's expenses will be lowered if the contractor is able to remove the forms and complete the structure more quickly. In cold weather, the time and cost of protecting the concrete from freezing will be materially reduced. A few years ago, calcium chloride was placed upon the market to accomplish these purposes. Very few tests of this salt, used for curing concrete, are now available. At the present time, the Portland Cement Association, the Illinois Division of Highways, and the U. S. Department of Agriculture are the main investigators. The chemical action of calcium chloride in curing concrete is not known. The theory is that it depends upon the hygroscOpic properties of the calcium chloride and its ability to absorb moisture. Tests were made for bond, compression, tension, time of set, hardness and surface condition of the concrete when treated externally with calcium chloride. Four specimens were used for each test. SPECIFICATIONS. The volumetric mix of 1:2:4 was used for all specimens except briquettes. Huron cement was used in all cases and the aggregate used was washed pebble and sand. The volumetric mix for the briquettes was 1:5, using Ottawa sand, except in the case of neat cement specimens. For internal treatment, the calcium chloride was dissolved in the mixing water in various percentages according to the weight of the cement. The external treatment was by placing calcium chloride on the surface in lbs. per sq. yd. of surface treated. The calcium chloride was that commercially known as Dow Flake. All coarse aggregate specimens were allowed to cure in the open without any covering or attention. The briquettes were cured in a moist chamber for 24 hours and then part were cured in water and the remainder were cured in air. All specimens that did not contain calcium chloride were cured in water. SPECIMENS. -------- EXTERNAL TREATMENT. When the surface is treated with Ca012 for the purpose of curing the concrete, the effect is noticable for a depth of i to 5/4 of an inch. The concrete for this depth remains soft and spongy for some time but finally sets up forming a scale on the surface which wears off very rapidly. The penetration depth is shown in Fig. 2, for a neat cement briquette. SHOWING THE DEPTH OF PENETRATION 0N NEAT CEMENT. If the air is dry and wanm the surface layer sets in a few days but if cold and moist it takes much longer. The surface hardness is affected by the chemical whereas the hardness of plain untreated neat cement is 5 3/4, treated with 2 lbs. per sq. yd. is 2 1/2, treated with 5 lbs. per sq. yd. is 2. The surface treatment discolors the surface, giving it a mottled effect. When the chemical is not evenly distributed it will pit the surface where the chemical lays in lumps, giving it the appearance of having been rained upon before it had its initial set. Dow Flake has a deleterious effect upon the surface layer but the main body of the concrete is equally good to concrete cured by the pending and moisture earth methods. SHOWING THE RIEHLE TESTING MACHINE. SHOWING THE MOT’ELING EFFECT AND FITS. INTERNAL TREA THEN T. Tension tests were made upon specimens containing different percentages of calcium chloride dissolved in the mixing water. The specimens that were cured in air showed a greater tensile strength than those cured in water. By observing the curves plotted on the following pages representing the two curve Specimens having the same amount of calcium chloride in the run.nearly parallel after they reach the peak. The chemical action, as far as we have investigated, cannot be determined, but we do know that calcium carbonate was the result of the chanical action. This may have been an action with the water as the mixing water contained carbonate from the chemical analysis. The calcium carbonate formed came to the lower portion of the briquette and formed stalactites, as shown in the Fig. 4, The chemical had the same effect on neat cement briquettes as it had on the briquettes of the 1:5 mix. It was more noticeable in the neat cement Specimens, as there was a greater difference in the tensile strength at the end of twenty eight days, than in the test made on the former. Although concrete is very seldom called upon to take any tension, there might be a time when the tensile strength would be necessary. However, from the above facts we draw our conclusion that when calcium.chloride was used internally there must have been some injurious chemical action to reduce the tensile strength, cured in water. The time of set is shown by the graphs. The greater the percentage of calcium chloride the greater the set. CURED IN AIR. PERCENT OF CALCIUM CHLORIDE. Days 0 .2 5 4 5 5 2 241 242 257 282 208 4 280 282 285 510 255 7 285 285 285 304 225 14 290 285 279 271 202 21 297 280 249 241 198 28 298 . 280 245 238 198 CURED IN WATER. 2 62 190 190 180 155 120 4 124 255 245 350 173 155 7 227 271 255 240 187 161 14 552 274 265 247 195 165 21 590 277 266 250 195 165 28 450 280 268 250 195 165 10 4. FIG 1 S OF CALCIUM CARBONATF‘. \ ..J SHO‘.".'IN G S TALC TI '1“? mm $1M .136 me .khmu. x00. 63 ex eostwfi %W W\ ....\.BQ N< Q3 Qmw emu 69.. Q9“ Lent/700! ....Meq QM. $2M Que w\ .N\ 0 . -... Q QQx OQN . M. .»m.w“3lshmmsizmlllllllllllllllllll...\\ m, new. pkg .. 0 he. Q Q? 1.3 6 mm .5 mm Nt‘bflx S seesaw; Q9“. GE AGRICULTURAL COLLE MICHIGAN .-. ...1 -. .. , , ,, ......q . ... _ . 2: EL 1: ._ a ... ...... . ,1 . 11......1111l . 1 1,. 1 ._ 13:.- 1:...- ..-..-. “.1.... I .. .. I...» ... I11. L .. I1. . h I... 1.1....1.....l _. . _. .. n .11“ . u 1 1. .1 . 1,. u -. 1.11..-- .... . -. 1W. . _ W 1 1 1 H u n . .ee.e,_nwc , _ ., 1 ......2.e§.§. , . .. DEFARTM [NT 0’ MAI‘HEMATICS «Man. 36 E... .Rme kuexwflx 5. waxwkmh QQ\ OQN spa/70d QQN Q2 $9.0 .1 I llllll1l . . II‘ I III I-II1I4IIICIIIIIIIIII1III I I I'll-0!! . I I . I II1. All '.'i\‘l A'. 11.4111 1. 1 11 . 1 .1 11— ml. Q 1”}..11..n .1. 1.... 1.111 L L. 1 . . U1. - . 169. .1.. . 1 x. 1. .. 1 .. T 1. 11. 1 L x 11 1 11 11. 1 . IIII .Llrrl. CIIIILIIVII ‘7‘. ¢ [Iii-... . .L.. l III..IL..I.ItHLll.IIII LII—.1 1'11!!! . L L L ....uxa3L11.1.111 - L. .1. . DON . .1... 1 . - 1. 1. W1 .1 .1. . 1 MI .1 1.. 1 . 1 .w L LL.L . ...1L1 LL. 1H4. .1 L- - -- L L L. 1... L. .1 .QQW L. ...-1. ..u LL... L . LLL .L.L..L.J..n 1.. , . 1. L 1. _ . . . 1. . ..1LL1 1 .1 .. 1 - W1 . L 1 . a} 1 -11 1 1. L 1. L L .Lm .... a 1 1 ...... ._,. . \u ....1 kn . . .5.mwx.0«>3\ 5.-3Hfl1un1.- :11... .1 . L .1.. 1S»? .. ...- .H 13.1.1111 DEPARTM ENT 6' MATHEMAi It... 1,:L,I4_,L;;Lr11 ‘1: LI. 1, 14.; . L t DEPARTMENT OF MATHEMAHCI DIPARYM ENT oi MATH mun:- '- L ... .1 u a I. L ‘- an U r L U ‘4'.""lifl '.N A IJI' .JIIII II I'll-Ill' . ..I I|.l.l.l IIII1IIII .I .I III..I.IIIIIII|IIIII I | . 1 11 1.1. 1. . .11. 1 . 1 «v.3.w1wbumx. 1 1. . 1. L1. DEPARTMENT OF MATH EMATICI 11.‘ 11 11 $1. . 11.. W .1 ..u. “1 1 . max m. Lama . I g”, ”11 1 hat... .3... .1 .1 ,1.........1.s..€§. ...-1...... . . $1 _- ,1 . ,.§....§au 1 .1, ,L 1 3...... 11 after inspecting the results of the compression tests made by the Illinois Division of Highways, we hesitate to advance any theory, as to the results of the compressive tests. Their tests were made using twelve different brands of cement, all of which passed the state Specifications for both physical and chemical tests. We found that the compressive strength of the Specimens containing calcium chloride increases up to and including 5%, after which the compressive strength decreased. All compression tests were embedded in plaster paris which were allowed to set before putting any stress upon the specimens. COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH IN LBS. PER SQ. IN. Ca012 percent 7 days 14 days 21 days 28 days; 0 1170 1800 2265 2500 2 1450 1855 2375 2625 5 1870 1925 2220 2715 4 1960 2100 2155 2160 5 1760 1900 2020 2260 B 1685 1895 1955 2190 . WW $N . HRQQ fix N.\ Qucmfic .Rx m5 2.353: at . VXMRWth U§~HHVXKE§~W QQ§\ IF“ ”0d SQN RICULTURAL COL! Et-E AG MICHIGAN 0 i , 3.9; .: DEPARTMENT or unnuunrca E MILHKJAN AGRICUI TURAL COLle my in we ‘_, --r r‘ ‘LL 7h DEPARTN ENT 0' MAT HIMATICI m\ ...ng 0N xeN §N N\ as s as .b..\ Nb +51% 3.x fix .\.\\R «xx.» Oéhhux «\EQU 1| ng 1794M ad _ seem. Ll'L-H AL L' ‘1 AN ACMHJU . , . v , , . . , ,. v . , x. ..I .1.: L .. n ‘y‘ _ . i f. . r_ .7 , , v . . 1 f :i 1 . i , ‘4‘ 1 1,, ? ,r v , i . ‘ w it. H‘ Ti , i v ‘ y a , . , , , p . v , , .H i .: ‘y . , Q”, 1: fi - . . ., p n , . . 1.11.4 .......... .....T ... I .. .... >"2..., - ,. u . x 1 _. , , , t v ‘. J . . , , ,, . , _ v ‘i . L, t , _ ‘ , . W m. _ . _H .H v , . . . r v ‘ .rx , , L t ‘ g \ i v 1“ ‘x _ . . . w n T T. v ,, , 1 i v 1... .! "nap an.- - hLXsmfi . n . knfiii , .v ...v €Mh§fln¥fl 405. «132% Es DEPARTH ENT 0' KATRINA I ICU - I! ll Pl l.lll|-II‘I. I I ...In Inllll-Iliu ..l .IIIII .. I IEIII.‘ (Illa-Ill. , . . L DEPARTM ENT 0' N A‘I’flIMATla ..... Is .1... A” ‘n . ...... \ L .. . U , ,- ... ‘\N A'-.'\' v. .§\N%.xu$\r&\,_ _ .E... ..J pwfiafikyfixu. ”$33.0 _ . ., _4i cuvar u. , v . . . n . .. titlillnlnl Ill-I. villilL .- MICHIGAN AGRICULTURAL COLLEGE 12 EFFECT ON STEE. The bond strength of concrete containing 6% calcium.shloride was greater than that which was not treated internally. The only way we can account for this is that the chemical attacked the smooth surface and gave the concrete a chance to cling to the surface. The bond strength was a great deal higher than that allowed in H001 and Johnson's Handbook, but this is accounted for by the factor of safety. But we could not say whether the bond would be affected by time, as the bars were rusted, which will be discussed in the next paragraph. The effect of calcium chloride in the concrete tended to rust and pit the steel. All steel embedded in the specimens was inspected carefully before it was .placed in the concrete. The steel used was smooth cold rolled with a low carbon content. Steel placed in concrete that was not treated with the chemical, was not affected, even though it remained in water for 28 days. When steel was placed in water for 10 days, it showed corrosion, but not as fast as when it:was placed in concrete that was treated with the chemical. A Specimen showing the corrosion of the steel is shown. 13 BOND STRENGTH. BOID II LBS-PER 3Q. II. AT 88 DAYS. Per cent of Ga 012 130 8 3 d 5 6 815 847 270 293 882 SHOWING RIEHLE COMERESSIOI IACHINE FIGURE SHOW HG CORROSION OF STEEL. 14 15 NORMAL COKSISTENCY. Standard tests for normal consistency by the use of a Vicat needle were performed. The amount of water expressed as a percentage of the dry cement to obtain the normal consistency was reduced by the addition of calcium chloride. These results were as follows for neat cement. % of 03012 0% 1% 2% 3% 4% 5% 5% % of water 26 26 25 25 24 24 23 Standard Gillmore needles were used in making the tests for the time of set. The cement was mixed to normal consistency. These tests were made when various percentages of calcium chloride were used. A cement may set so quickly that it will be worthless for some kinds of work; since handling cement after it commences to set weakens it and causes it to disintegrate. From the data and the graphs which follow it is seen that calcium chloride greatly accelerates the set. TIME OF SET. D 1 3 3 4 5 5 6/; Of C8012 be me be me he me he 111. he 111. he me he 111. Initial Set 2 5 1 35 1 15 O 24 0 9 O 2 0 1 Final Set 6 50 3 46 2 33 l 48 l 2 O 28 O 10 Ho 02*: Time offer by G /'//mare Need/(.5 0 2. ’1‘ 6 Per: epf Ca Cl,L CONCLUSION. The results secured in these investigations, to hasten the set, satisfy us that calcium chloride could be incorporated in concrete to advantage under certain conditions, such as concrete which will be used for pavements, and slabs that do not contain reinforcing steel. The surface treatment for curing can be used in place of the ordinary methods of pending or using damp earth for covering,but care should be taken in Spreading the chemical over the surface so as to insure an even coat to prevent unnecessary pitting. We found that by treating internally the bond strength was increased in preportion to the amount of calcium chloride used,but in turn, the effect upon the steel is very deleterious as rusting takes place immediately. Also,that calcium chloride when used internally in concrete which is allowed to set in water does not get the desired strength. In conclusion we recommend using calcium chloride as an agent, for curing and hastening the net that it be limited to 3% of the weight of the cement for internal treatment,and 21bs. per sq. yd. for surface treatment. BIBLIOGRIPHY. Report of tests conducted in an investigation to determine the effect of calcium chloride in concrete on compressive strength. U.S. Department of Agriculture ------------------------- J. H. Bateman Cutting down curing period for concrete roads. Illinois Division of Highways, 1924 ---------------------- H. F. Clemmer, An Investigation of the use of calcium chloride as a curing agent and accelerator of concrete. Illinois Division of Highways, 1925 ------- --- H. E. Clemmer, How to cure Concrete -------------------------- Dow Chemical Company, How to maintain Roads ------------------------- Dow Chemical Chm‘pany. Discussion of the paper presented by mr. Clemmer on "The use of calcium chloride as an accelerator in concrete hardening." U.S. Bureau of Public Roads. -------------------- H. F. Clemmer, Concrete Engineers' Handbook, 1922, ----------- Hool & Johnson, Protection of cold weather concrete ----------- Portland Cement Assoc. Economic Value of Mixtures, American J. C. Pearson, Concrete Institute ----------------- - F. A. Hitchcock, Winter-built Concrete ------------------------- Portland Cement Assoc. . w ., . .. ...... ..II. I. 1.-.. ..I«.....LrhnIII..4.I.~1.I.M~.. 233......1L I u . . .. .. .... . . . . . . . , I .. .. .. ... ...u V . .....1.1.~....I. It. .. . J). . I:I.I. .I I.., ... . . . v .. . . .. f . . V..V.. .. .. . . . . .. . .... .....I .,, a~ienw.». . .. ,J‘I’tIdluuizuliII. Mil. 11— 43 26 '59. 41M 5‘ ‘w. . . .. . a u . . 1‘ , 7 . . . - I iii 11 IV .I. e. x ., . . u .rfir. eJQYN 1r... Pfin..! thvuuwruuuflvblv I. .h..p.7..v\,iu)lu.t1~.wv: 1.1...- mil. Illflliflhulflellflin I I‘ll I'Illt there's-Tm .i‘i \ .- ‘ . I-i‘lvill. .l‘..\,H..lecfl .enlfnu- l.(\l. .Vnh‘e.J(LI.eV«Lv.ch¢\Cv\.VN‘-uef tn 2...... v ... .. . ., V51. V.....\- . 4 .. .1.. .. ...u . .\ . , .. . \ ... i w . (k ..Yae‘ 1.. . . . . \v IJ‘uui; . ..1.\..£v~..v\e\.-I~.\..\.~\ .k.~ .ul.h............\ .. a. e...x,..vs.... 111... .x .13... .. u ......1. . 3 . . .. . . . . . , . . . . q , . . . . . . I. .. ....r.,.|_;s.. .. ....(I: . . ...: . . .. . . , . ....,,. .. ... ... . . MIIIIWNIIIIIIHII WIIIIIIIIIIII WIIIIIIIWES 3 1293 03058 0926