1 T HESTQ Mie‘é‘afiflw f-‘z‘j,3';;§;~,3 F Univemte" i /. 7.“. arv vv (IV we VT This is to certify that the thesis entitled Physiological State of Bacteria in the Rumen presented by Joy Ann Gillett has been accepted towards fulfillment of the requirements for MS degree in Animal Science Werner G. Bergen Major professor Date May 2. 1983 0.7639 MS U is an Affirmative Action/Equal Opportunity Institution MSU LIBRARIES m ‘1 RETURNING MATERIALS: Place in book drop to remove this checkout from your record. FINES wiil be charged if book is returned after the date stamped beIow. PHYSIOLOGICAL STATE OF BACTERIA IN THE RUMEN BY Joy Ann Gillett A THESIS Submitted to Michigan State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE Department of Animal Science 1983 /37- 2251/ ABSTRACT PHYSIOLOGICAL STATE OF BACTERIA IN THE RUMEN BY Joy Ann Gillett Four mature wethers were fed isonitrogenous (12.2% CP) diets (I, II, III) every 12 hours containing 3.03 (I), 3.46 (II), 3.91 (III) Neal DE/kg. Free bacteria and bacteria bound to feed particles (estimated by colony counts x log/gm) were determined 0, 2, 5, 8, 11 hours after feeding. RNA/protein for both bacterial fractions was determined every other hour (0 hr. - 12 hr.). Higher free and bound counts were observed on III and exhibited variation over sampling times. Free counts were: (initial and maximum values) I, 2.96 and 4.87: II, 6.03 and 8.34; III, 13.24 and 22.96. Bound counts were: I, 4.65 and 7.03; II, 7.01 and 8.13: III, 18.00. Free bacterial RNA/protein increased after feeding for all diets (initial and maximum values: I, .251 and .323; II, .245 and .344; III, .384 and .516) and were highest on III indicating free bacteria respond physiologically to changes in available sub- strates. Bound bacterial RNA/protein were lower than free bacterial RNA/protein and were relatively stable over sampling times (average values: I, .228; II, .147: III, .216) indicating that bound bacteria are growing slowly. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to express my sincere thanks (and appreciation) to Dr. Werner G. Bergen for his guidance and endless encouragement throughout my graduate program and during preparation of this manuscript. Special appreciation is also extended to Drs. M. T. Yokoyama, J. T. Huber and J. C. Waller for their careful review of this manuscript and assistance in my graduate work. Gratitude is expressed to Dr. W. T. Magee for his help in the statistical analysis of data. I wish to thank Dr. R. R. Nelson, chairman of the Department of Animal Science, for providing the facilities and financial support which allowed this research to be undertaken. I also would like to thank the following people for their assistance: Donna Jo Cox for her help in the statistical analysis of data, Elizabeth Rimpau for laboratory assistance, and Mary Gillett and Scott Barao for the preparation of graphs and slides. A very special thank you is extended to Kris Johnson for her unselfish willing- ness to help in any and every way possible. These people took time out from hectic schedules to help me so that I could complete my work in time to leave for a new position. I cannot thank them enough. My sincere appreciation is also expressed to Douglas B. Bates. His extensive knowledge and technical expertise in the area of rumen microbiology were invaluable to me. Without his help this research would not have been possible. Finally, I would like to thank my parents, Dolly and Jack Gillett, for their unceasing support throughout :my academic career. I would especially like to thank my mother for the many long nights she spent carefully typing this manuscript and for her love and understanding. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Page LIST OF TABLESOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOV LIST OF FIGURES. O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O OVii I 0 INTRODUCTION 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O I O I O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O I 1 I I 0 LITERATURE REVIEW. 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 3 Rumen Fermentation...........................3 The Relationship Between Bacterial RNA and Protein Content, and Growth Rate...........7 The Use of Microbial RNA as a Marker for Rumen Digesta Passage Studies.............11 Cultivation of Rumen Bacteria...............l4 Factors Affecting Bacterial Numbers in the Rumen.....................................20 III. MATERIALS AND METHODS General Design of Experiment................28 Treatments..................................30 Sample Collection and Preparation...........30 Determination of Viable Counts in Rumen Contents..................................34 Volatile Fatty Acids Determination..........35 Rumen Ammonia Determination.................37 RNA-Protein Ratio Determination in Ruminal Bacteria..................................37 Statistical Analysis........................39 IV. RESULTS Rumen pH, and Volatile Fatty Acid and Ammonia Concentrations............................40 Free Bacterial Colony Counts................45 Bound Bacterial Colony Counts...............50 Variation of RNA-Protein Ratios with Time for Free Ruminal Bacteria.....................56 Variation of RNA-Protein Ratios with Time for Bound Ruminal Bacteria....................6l iii VI. VII. VIII. TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued) Page DISCUSSION General Rumen Fermentation Parameters.......68 Rumen Bacterial Colony Counts...............69 RNA-Protein Ratios for Free and Bound Ruminal BacteriaOOOOOO0.00.0.0.0...0.0.0.00000000071 GENERAL CONCLUSIONSOOOOOOOOOO0.00.00.00.000077 LIST OF REFERENCESOOOO00.00.000.00000000000078 APPENDIX.0.0.0....000O0.00.00.00.0000000000087 iv Table A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 LIST OF TABLES Page Composition of Experimental Diets..............29 Composition of Rumen Fluid Media...............36 Rumen Fluid pH, and Volatile Fatty Acid and Ammonia Concentrations for Sheep Fed Diet 1..........41 Rumen Fluid pH, and Volatile Fatty Acid and Ammonia Concentrations for Sheep Fed Diet 2..........42 Rumen Fluid pH, and Volatile Fatty Acid and Ammonia Concentrations for Sheep Fed Diet 3..........44 Free Bacterial Colony Counts Per Gram of Rumen contentSOOOOO00......OOOOCOOOOOOOOO0000......46 Bound Bacterial Colony Counts Per Gram of Rumen contentSOOOOOOOO0......00.0.0000000000000000051 RNA-Protein Ratios For Free Rumen Bacteria.....57 RNA-Protein Ratios For Bound Rumen Bacteria....62 Free Bacterial Colony Counts Per Gram of Rumen contents-Sheep 905....OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO.87 Bound Bacterial Colony Counts Per Gram of Rumen contents-Sheep 9050......0.0.0.00000000000087 Free Bacterial Colony Counts Per Gram of Rumen contents-Sheep 913.00000000000000000000000.88 Bound Bacterial Colony Counts Per Gram of Rumen contents-Sheep 913.000.000.00...0.0.00.0...88 RNA-Protein Ratios For Free Rumen Bacteria -Sheep 905.00.000.00.0000000000000000000000.89 RNA-Protein Ratios For Bound Rumen Bacteria -Sheep 905.00.000.00.000.00.00.000000000000089 A7 A8 A9 A10 A11 A12 LIST OF TABLES (Continued) Page RNA-Protein Ratios For Free Rumen Bacteria -Sheep 898.000......0.0.0.0....0.00.00.00.0090 RNA-Protein Ratios For Bound Rumen Bacteria -Sheep 898.00.00.000I.0.0.0.000000000000000090 RNA-Protein Ratios For Free Rumen Bacteria -Sheep913.00.000.00.000.0.0000000000000000091 RNA-Protein Ratios For Bound Rumen Bacteria -Sheep 913.0.0...0.0.0.00.00.00.00000000000091 RNA-Protein Ratios For Free Rumen Bacteria —Sheep 9000......0.000000000COOOOOOOOOOOOCO.92 RNA—Protein Ratios For Bound Rumen Bacteria -Sheep 900.00.000.00...0.0.0.00000000000000092 vi LIST OF FIGURES Figure Page 1 Flow Chart of Sampling Procedures and Laboratory Analyses for Bacterial RNA and Protein.......33 2 Free Bacterial Colony Counts Per Gram of Rumen Contents for Two Sheep Fed Diet 1............47 3 Free Bacterial Colony Counts Per Gram of Rumen Contents for Two Sheep Fed Diet 2............48 4 Free Bacterial Colony Counts Per Gram of Rumen Contents for Two Sheep Fed Diet 3............49 5 Bound Bacterial Colony Counts Per Gram of Rumen Contents for Two Sheep Fed Diet l............53 6 Bound Bacterial Colony Counts Per Gram of Rumen Contents for Two Sheep Fed Diet 2............54 7 Bound Bacterial Colony Counts Per Gram of Rumen Contents for Two Sheep Fed Diet 3............55 8 RNA-Protein Ratios for Free Bacteria From Sheep Fed Diet 1.0.0.0000...OOOOOOOOOOOOIOOOOOO0.0.58 9 RNA—Protein Ratios for Free Bacteria From Sheep Fed Diet 2.0...OOOOOOOOOOOOI0.0.00.000000000059 10 RNA-Protein Ratios for Free Bacteria From Sheep Fed Diet 3......OOOOOOOOOOOOOOO0.0.0.00000000060 11 RNA-Protein Ratios for Bound Bacteria From Sheep Fed Diet 1.0...0.0.0.0000...0.0.00.000000000064 12 RNA-Protein Ratios for Bound Bacteria From Sheep Fed Diet 2.0.0.00000000000000.00.00.00.00000065 13. RNA-Protein Ratios for Bound Bacteria From Sheep Fed Diet 3.00......OOOOOOOOOOOOIOOOOOIOOOIO0.66 vii INTRODUCTION The importance of rumen bacteria to the nutrition of ruminants is well documented. Rumen microorganisms degrade B-linked polysacchar’ides (cellulose) into products that the host animal can either digest or absorb. Dietary nitrogen, whether protein or non-protein in origin, is converted to microbial protein of relatively high biological value. This conversion is advantageous when low quality protein or non-protein nitrogen sources are fed, but a disadvantage when the ration contains high quality protein. Chemically modifying high quality protein in order to protect it from ruminal degradation has attracted great interest. In order to determine the amount of dietary protein passing from the rumen to the duodenum, it is necessary to estimate the fraction of the digesta protein which is of microbial origin. Bacterial ribonucleic acid (RNA) has been used to estimate the microbial nitrogen in digesta samples by relating the RNA content in the digesta to the ratio of bacterial RNA nitrogen - total cellular nitrogen. It is assumed that the bacterial RNA-N-total N ratio does not vary over time or between rumen bacterial species. Growth rate and rate of removal determines the size of the rumen bacterial population. As the dilution rate of the 1 liquid and solid fractions of the rumen digesta are different, the growth rate of a microorganism would depend mainly on whether it was ”free” in the rumen liquor or bound to feed particles. Since the RNA-protein ratio is directly proportional to bacterial growth or dilution rate, it would appear that the free and bound rumen bacteria should have different RNA-protein ratios. In addition, as the dilution rate of the rumen varies with time after feeding it seems that the bacterial RNA-protein ratio must vary also. The present study was designed to determine the numbers of free and bound bacteria in the rumen at various times after feeding and the RNA-protein ratios of these bacteria for sheep fed corn silage and high grain rations. LITERATURE REVIEW Rumen Fermentation The rumen may be compared to "a continuous microbial culture system with a more or less continuous substrate and buffer supply and fermentation end product removal system” (Bergen et a1., 1982). The pH is usually about 6 to 7 and is maintained by the buffering action of the saliva which contains sodium and potassium bicarbonate and urea, by absorption of volatile fatty acids (VFA) through the rumen wall and by ammonia production by the rumen microorganisms (Bryant, 1970). There are three distinct bacterial populations in the rumen: l) bacteria which are free floating in the rumen fluid, 2) bacteria which are attached to feed particles and_ 3) bacteria which adhere to the rumen epithelium (Cheng and Costerton, 1980).. Rumen bacteria anaerobically ferment carbohydrates such as starch, cellulose, pectin and xylan (Allison, 1965a). The polysaccharides are hydrolyzed to soluble oligosaccharides and sugars by polysaccharide- hydrolyzing bacteria. These organisms and iother sugar- fermenting microbes ferment the extracellular intermediates to yield characteristic ruminal fermentation end products: acetate, propionate and butyrate (VFA) and carbon dioxide (Bryant, 1970). Rumen methanogenic bacteria reduce C02 to methane. Many rumen microorganisms form products such as hydrogen, succinate, formate, lactate and ethanol which are metabolized to the final end products by other species. Ruminococcus flavefaciens and Bacteroides succinogenes produce succinate which is subsequently decarboxylated to propionate by Selenomonas ruminantium (Blackburn and Hungate, 1963). Other microbes produce formate which is rapidly degraded to C02 and hydrogen. The methanogens utilize the hydrogen to form methane (Wol in, 1974). Selenomonas ruminantium produced lactate when grown in pure culture but when this organism was grown in the presence of a methanogen there was a marked decrease in lactate production and an increase in acetate production with the hydrogen being used to reduce C02 (Chen and Wolin, 1977). Iannotti et a1. (1973) co-cultured lRuminococcus ‘glbgg and Vibrio succinogenes. The hydrogen produced by R, £1331: was used by l. succinogenes to reduce fumarate to succinate. No ethanol production was detected but acetate production increased relative to the mono-culture. These interspecies hydrogen transfer systems are energetically favorable. The shifts in fermentation caused by the Hz-utilizing organisms results in a decrease in the flow of carbon atoms into single culture fermentation products such as ethanol and lactate. Acetate formation from pyruvate produces adenosine triphosphate (ATP) whereas lactate or ethanol production from pyruvate yields no ATP. More energy is therefore made available for bacterial growth. The nitrogen entering the rumen consists of protein and non-protein nitrogen sources such as peptides, amino acids, purines, pyrolles, choline, urea, ammonia, nitrates and nitrites (McDonald, 1952). The amino compounds and nitrogenous bases may be deaminated by the rumen microorganisms (McDonald, 1952) while the nitrate and nitrite are reduced to ammonia (Lewis, 1951). Bacterial proteolysis of dietary protein produces peptides and amino acids which may be deaminated to form ammonia, C02 and VFA. The concentration of free amino acids in the rumen is low and there is little absorption of the amino acids through the rumen epithelium (Leibholz and Hartmann, 1972). Rumen microorganisms exhibit a high urease activity, degrading urea to ammonia and C02. Ammonia is absorbed from the rumen into the portal blood stream and is converted to urea by the liver (McDonald, 1952). The urea may be excreted in the urine or return to the rumen via the saliva or diffusion from the blood (Wolin, 1981). The ammonia produced from the degradation of protein and non-protein compounds is probably the most important source of nitrogen for rumen bacteria. Up to 78% of bacterial nitrogen may be derived from ammonia depending on the ration fed (Smith et al., 1980). It is necessary to supply an adequate amount of both nitrogen and energy in a ration in order to maintain a balanced rumen fermentation (Wallace, 1979). If energy intake is insufficient, there will be an increase in both ammonia concentration in the rumen and ammonia absorption into the bloodstream. This situation is most prevalent when the diet is deficient in readily available carbohydrate such as starch. Cellulose is of little benefit in enabling the bacteria to utilize free ammonia (Smith, 1969). Many rumen microorganisms synthesize cellular amino acids using ammonia even when an exogenous supply of amino acids are available (Allison, 1965a). Apparently, some rumen bacteria lack a transport systen for amino acids or this mechanism is functioning at a very low activity (Allison, 1969). Bacteroides ruminicola is able to make use of oligopeptide nitrogen as the sole source of cell nitrogen, but not in preference to ammonia nitrogen (Pittman et al., 1967). Carbon for amino acid biosynthesis is iderived from fermentation end products. Isovalerate, isobutyrate and 2- methylbutyrate are carboxylated and aminated to produce leucine, valine and isoleucine, respectively. This type of reaction is not limited to the biosynthesis of branched- chain amino lacids, as phenylacetic acid carbon is incorporated into phenylalanine (Allison, 1965b) and indole- 3-acetic acid is incorporated into tryptophan (Allison and Robinson, 1967). The carbon skeletons of isobutyrate, isovalerate and 2-methy1butyrate are also incorporated into higher fatty acids (Garton, 1965). Ruminococcus flavefaciens produced branched-chain acids consisting of 15 and 17 carbon atoms from isovalerate and 3. 3133s used isobutyrate to form C14 and C16 branched—chain fatty acids (Garton, 1965). The Relationship Between Bacterial RNA and Protein Content, and Growth Rate Bacterial growth may be defined as the orderly increase of all chemical constituents (Stanier et al., 1976). The chemical composition and size of a microorganism varies depending on the rate of growth which is attainable in a given environment (Schaechter et al., 1958). However, an increase in mass may be due to the synthesis of storage products such as polysaccharides, polyphosphates and poly-B -hydroxybutyrate. Production of these storage molecules is not indicative of true growth. When bacteria are cultured in a nutritionally adequate medium, a state of balanced growth eventually will be achieved. This steady state of growth is reached when all cellular components increase at the same rate over a given period of time (Schaechter, 1973). The growth rate of a microbial population with a constant chemical composition may be determined by measuring the increase of any cell constituent. Bacterial ribonucleic acid (RNA), deoxy- ribonucleic acid (DNA) and protein content increase with increasing growth rate (Schaechter et al., 1958). It has been observed that the ratios of RNA/protein and RNA/DNA are linear functions of the growth rate while the ratio of DNA/protein is independent of growth rate (Rosset et al., 1966). Ribosomal efficiency has been described as the average protein synthesis rate per ribosome and is determined by the fraction of the total number of ribosomes which are engaged in protein synthesis (active ribosomes) and. the ;peptide chain elongation rate (Dennis and Bremer, 1974a). Several workers reported a constant number of protein molecules synthesized per unit of RNA at various growth rates for Salmonella typhimurium (Kjeldgaard, 1961; Ecker and Kokaisl, 1969). This implied a constant efficiency of the ribosomes in the synthesis of proteins. Leick (1968) observed a similar ribosomal efficiency in several different types of microorganisms with growth rates varying from u=0.5/hour to u=2.33/hour. Microorganisms shifted from a nutritionally poor to a nutritionally rich medium (shift up) exhibited an immediate increase in RNA production followed by a rise in protein synthesis (Kjeldgaard, 1961). During both steady state and shift up conditions, a constant ratio existed between ribosomes and protein synthesized. However, this does not indicate a constant efficiency in the synthesis of specific proteins as ribosomal proteins comprised one third of the total proteins synthesized during the shift up. Other workers have disagreed with the constant ribosomal efficiency theory. Rosset et a1. (1966) reported that the efficiency of ribosomal RNA (rRNA) increased with increasing growth rates for Escherichia coli grown atu>0.4 doublings/hour. Dennis and Bremer (1974a) concluded that the ribosomal efficiency for g, ggli_strain B/r is constant for u>1.2 doublings/hour and gradually decreases for 1J RNA, Protein Figure 1. Flow Chart of Sampling Procedure and Laboratory Analyses for Bacterial RNA and Protein 4. Determination of Viable Counts in Rumen Contents The anaerobic technique used to culture the rumen bacteria was based on procedures developed by Hungate (1950). Rumen fluid for the preparation of media was obtained from a fistulated Holstein steer fed a corn silage diet. Rumen fluid from sheep 900 and 905 was used to determine numbers of free and bound bacteria. Samples were taken 0, 2, 5, 8 and 11 hours after feeding. Rumen fluid was collected in vacuum bottles and transported to the laboratory for further processing. Approximately 20 g of rumen contents (care was taken to obtain a uniform mixture of solids and liquid) were weighed and squeezed through two layers of cheesecloth. The solids were placed in ice and the rumen liquor was placed in. a Waring blender which contained 90 ml of anaerobic dilution solution (ADS). A stream of C02 was passed into the blender. The carbon dioxide used to maintain anaerobic conditions was initially passed through a column of hot, reduced copper filings to remove trace amounts of oxygen. The rumen liquor was mixed vigorously for three minutes. Five milliliters of this dilution was pipetted into a dilution bottle containing 45 m1 ADS. One milliliter was then pipetted into another dilution bottle containing 100 ml ADS. This process was repeated two more times to achieve a final dilution of 10‘8. Each dilution bottle had a stream of co2 bubbled through the ADS and each bottle was shaken 30 times between 34 35 transfers. One milliliter of the final dilution was inoculated into 10 ml of agar media (Table 2) which had been melted previously and maintained at 50°C in a water bath. The test tube was gently shaken tat mix the 'media and inoculate, and then quickly rolled on ice to harden and distribute the media on the inside surface of the test tube. The rumen solids were then blended, diluted and inoculated following the same procedure used for the rumen liquor. The roll tubes were incubated at 37°C for six days and colony counts were determined from an average of four or more of the roll tube cultures. 5. Volatile Fatty Acids Determination Five milliliters of the rumen liquor-mercuric chloride sample was mixed with 1 ml of 25% metaphosphoric acid and centrifuged at 12,100 x g for 10 minutes. The supernatant was used for the determination of rumen VFA concentrations by gas liquid chromatography. Samples were run on a Hewlett Packard G.L.C. Model 5840A. The column (six feet long and 2 mm internal diameter, stainless steel tubing) was packed with 10% SP-1200/1% H3PO4 on 80/100 Chromosorb W AW, the flow rate was 40 ml/minute nitrogen and the column temperature was 130°C (Anonymous, 1975). A standard solution of volatile fatty acids was prepared and used for the identification and quantification of the VFA in the samples. 36 TABLE 2. COMPOSITION OF RUMEN FLUID MEDIAa L _Ingredient % in medium Carbohydrateb (wt/vol) 0.2 Trypticase (wt/vol) 0.2 Yeast extract (wt/vol) 0.05 Mineral onec 3.5 Mineral twoc 3.5 Hemin solutionc .l Volatile fatty acid solutionc .1 Resazurin (0.1%) .05 Clarified rumen fluid 22.2 Agar (wt/vol) 2.0 Distilled water 66.7 Cysteine sulfidec 2.0 Na2C03 solution (8%) 4.4 aPrepared under C02; volume/volume unless otherwise specified. bGlucose and cellobiose, 0.033% (wt/vol) each; starch and xylan, 0.067% (wt/vol) each. cHoldeman, Cato and Moore, 1977. 37 6. Rumen Ammonia Determination An additional .2 ml of saturated mercuric chloride was added to 5.3 m1 of the rumen liquor-mercuric chloride sample in order to have the same concentration of mercuric chloride in the samples as in the blank and standards. The samples then had .5 ml 9N H2804 added and were centrifuged at 43,500 x g for 15 minutes. The residue was discarded and the supernatant was analyzed for rumen ammonia nitrogen with a Technicon Auto Analyzer II. With this system a color reaction is produced by the mixing of the sample with sodium hypochlorite and salicylate-nitroprusside. Standards were prepared by dissolving 4.8 g (NH4)ZSO4 in one liter of water to yield a concentration of 100 mg N/100 m1. This standard was diluted to give 5, 10 and 20 mg N/100 ml. To each 5 ml quantity of standard, .5 m1 9N H2804 and .5 ml of saturated mercuric chloride were added. The blank consisted of 5 ml H20, .5 ml mercuric chloride, and .5 7. RNA-Protein Ratio Determination in Ruminal Bacteria Ten milliliters of 5% TCA was added to frozen samples and hand homogenized. Samples were then placed in a 95°C water bath for 30 minutes and centrifuged at 48,200 x g for 20 minutes. The RNA was determined in the supernatant and the pellet was analyzed for protein. For the RNA analysis, 2 ml of 1% orcinol reagent solution (1 g orcinol in 100 m1 of 0.1% FeCl3'6H20 in 38 concentrated HCl) was added to test tubes containing 2 ml of sample, 2 m1 5% TCA (blank) or 2 ml of standard and placed in a boiling water bath for 30 minutes. Samples were cooled in running water and read at room temperature on a Gilford Spectrophotometer at 680 nm. Standards were prepared by dissolving 5 mg of Bakers Yeast RNA in 100 ml of 5% TCA. This represented a concentration of 50 ug/ml which was further diluted to yield concentrations of 12.5, 20.0 and 37.5 Ug/ml. Standards were run with each batch of samples and samples were appropriately diluted to allow readings within the range of standard values. Samples were prepared and analyzed at least three times. The protein was determined by resuspending the pellet in 5 m1 1N NaOH and placing in a 90°C water bath for 15 minutes. A gelling affect was noticed and for diet 2, 20 ml of l N NaOH was added and samples were placed in a 95°C water bath for 30 minutes. An incomplete solubilization of the protein still occurred and for diet 3, samples were mixed with 10 m1 of l N NaOH, heated to 95°C in a water bath for 30 minutes and then placed in a 50°C water bath (until further dilution) in order to prevent solidification of the sample. The Hartree (1972) modification of the Lowry (1951) method for determination of protein was used. Reagent A consisted of 2 g KNaC4H406°4H20 and 100 g Na2CO3 dissolved in 500 m1 1N NaOH and diluted with water to one liter. 39 Reagent B contained 2 g KNaC4H406°4H20 and 1 g CuSO4‘5H20 dissolved in 90 ml H20 and 10 ml 1N NaOH. Phenol reagent was prepared by diluting one part Phenol Reagent, Folin, & Ciocalteu (Harleco) in ten parts water. A water blank was used and standards were prepared by gently heating 100 mg of bovine serum albumen (BSA) in 500 ml H20 until dissolved. This standard concentration of 0.2 mg/ml was diluted to give 0.15, 0.1 and 0.05 mg/ml of BSA. One milliliter of samples, standards and blank were placed in test tubes containing 0.9 ml of reagent A. Samples were then placed in a 50°C water bath for 10 minutes, cooled to room temperature and then 0.1 ml of reagent B was added. Samples were left at room temperature for 10 minutes. Three milliliters of phenol reagent was added and then the samples were placed in a 50°C water bath for 10 minutes. Test tubes were cooled to room temperature and read at 650 nm on a Gilford SpectrOphotometer. Standards were run with each batch of samples and samples were appropriately diluted and run at least three times. 8. Statistical Analysis Colony count and RNA-protein ratio data were analyzed for treatment differences by the split-plot analysis (of variance method on the Hewlett Packard 9825A computer. RESULTS Rumenng, and Volatile Fatty Acid and Ammonia Concentrations Rumen pH, volatile fatty acid and ammonia concentrations were measured to characterize the ruminal fermentation in the sheep fed the three different diets. Rumen fluid pH, volatile fatty acids and ammonia concentrations for sheep fed diet 1 are presented in Table 3. Rumen pH values decreased to a minimum at 2 hours post feeding and increased through the 12 hour sampling time. Ammonia concentration increased to a maximum at 2 hours post feeding, decreased to a minimum at 6 hours after feeding and then increased to the 12 hour sampling time. Total VFA and acetate concentrations increased between 0 and 8 hour sampling times and decreased at 12 hours after feeding. Propionate concentration increased between 0 and 2 hours post feeding, remained relatively stable through 8 hours after feeding and then decreased at 12 hours post feeding. Butyrate concentration increased between both 0 and 2 hour sampling times, and 4 and 8 hour sampling times and decreased at 12 hours after feeding. Rumen fluid pH, and volatile fatty acid and ammonia concentrations for sheep fed diet 2 are given in Table 4. 40 41 .ooosu v uOu coauo~>oo unaccoun can scorn afiva w ac.co vot— n out" as...” .+. up; SYN "YTNH ant" u v0.5 am.~ wocéd 91m “Neon oat—n u 97”: do...” « nm.~ nm.m « oa.m ca; « mafia .3..— unqa oN.o «mien «c8.— .+. vo.om avid wao.¢a cN.c 2.0.." No.0 n ¢~.~ oo.~ “an...” ho.N a 6N5 no.m «hvéu am.c “cog; vat: “avg; mN.o ”.24 2..o “hm; vain «co.N.— so; w 2.6 mv.~ «hwéu °N.o «23" «Hod «vu.oo nH.o “vs!" 90.9 «hm.~ o~.n «ha.NH 2.2—” a '06 nc.v « muffin .34. w 20...: o~.n~ "he.ee 1:5. sauce oe.~ "ce.~ .xe. ouuuoda> .25. Ha.e. "a." oueuauenaaruoza~ u ouuuoao>0un 3.. e 3.2 2.5 333.6 ma.«» cm.m 1:5. ounesuanoun Ho.n.eov.ma Axe. ouucoanoum aim « $9.2” :95 0969001 mm.~ edd.na om.n”«~o.a ~e.~“.o~.e ca." “ma.m~ au.~ “em.w~ m..~ “no.a~ .Hoxue. umcoea< 36 womé 2.3.26 2.336 3.336 2.32.6 8.32.6 an eeuH «A a u e N c mcscoem nouua meson ca same can manna mom monecmazuozoo anzozza oz: ano¢ space ug~e¢an> azc .am oases zuzam .n mamas 42 .moocn . uOu couuou>oo unaccouu one cause 2.2 2...: ...3 29.3 3.2 .223 2.3 3.63 2.3» 2.2 8.2 e 3.2 :3. 230... 2.. “2.2 a... 3.2 22 “2.... m... «2.2 8.2 22 o... a 2.2 :3. 333.5 .2:. 3.2 “2.. 2... “2.2 22 2:... 2.2 1.2 2.2“ 32 S... 3.. 333233.22 I ouauoauboun a... w ...2 m... “8.2 3.. “3.2 3.. fl ...2 2... «2.3 3.. e 2.... :3. 333:. m... «2.. ...2 2.. 2... .2... 3.2 2.... 2.2 3.. 2... m... E... 332303 3.2 “2.3 2.2 “2.2 ...~e 8.2 22 H 3.2 3.. w 2.2 2... e 2.3 :3. 32838.. .... « ...... n... e 2... 8.2 a 2... 2.. . 2.2. 2.... 2.... 2... e .o... is. 9.3.2 3." «.22 22 .2... 2.2 2.... 2.2 “.32 2... “3.3 a... «2... Saxon. 3:35.. 3.. “a... 2... “3.. 3... 2:... 2.. e2... .2... 3... 3.. 2... an no.” 2 . . . ~ . .52.... 3...... 3.6.. 6N EHO Duh mum—a «Oh mZOHBEZfiUZOU tuna—Oi 02¢ an“: Edh Hawking 02¢ 33 OHDJh zgafl .v ”405—. 43 Rumen pH values decreased from 0 hours after feeding to a minimum at 6 hours post feeding and then increased to a maximum value at 12 hours after feeding. Rumen ammonia concentration increased to a maximum at 2 hours after feeding and decreased to a minimum at 6 hours post feeding. Total VFA concentration remained stable between 0 and 2 hour sampling times, then increased to a maximum at 8 hours post feeding and then decreased to a minimum at 12 hours. Acetate and propionate concentrations increased between 0 and 8 hours post feeding and then decreased to minimum levels at 12 hours after feeding. Butyrate concentration increased between 0 and 4 hours, remained relatively constant between 4 and 8 hours after feeding and then decreased to a minimum at 12 hours post feeding. Rumen fluid pH, and volatile fatty acid and ammonia concentrations for sheep fed diet 3 are shown in Table 5. Rumen pH values decreased from a maximum at 0 hours post feeding to a minimum value at the 2 hour sampling time, remained relatively constant through 8 hours after feeding and then increased at 12 hours post feeding. Ammonia concentration increased from 0 hours after feeding to a maximum at 2 hours post feeding, decreased to a minimum at 6 hours after feeding and then it increased to 12 hours post feeding. Total VFA concentration increased from a minimum at 0 hours after feeding to a maximum at 4 hours post feeding. Acetate and propionate concentrations increased from minimum values at 0 hours post feeding to maximum 44 .moosu . new couuo0>oc unaccouu can cumin vu.o~ “vo.~m nv.ma «oc.cm H¢.H «ON.H nn.d «mo.n hr.d wom.~ aa.d «an.N «c.v uoH.o vN.v «on.o o~.~ «mm.N on.a «cm.N oo.oa «cm.mu H¢.NHM ma.ha NN.¢ ao~.nN «o.n «mo.mN Nm.vd whc.hm MN.0H uhh.nw w~.H woo.n ca.c «c~.~ mm.H “Hv.N wh.H woN.N mN.n umm.h av.v «no.0 ¢H.H mam.N ma.o nou.~ mm.NHu ch.hH vm.nH who.°N no.0 nom.vN hm.N «va.hu cm.aH wvn.Nw oo.H “av.” No.uw vw.n on.v “av.od mv.au uc.~ hc.HHw vo.od aw.Nn Nh.m~ .a... "~n.o. .za. deuce 2..” “.2.2 .2:. ououo2a> .25. ...H .2... oueuauan2aruuxn~ I ounuoau>0un n.... c... .2:. ouauauan 6N.H« wH.N all. ououauanoun o... a....2 .xe. ouuc02n00m mn.v nov.HN ASE. cucum0¢ no.o “a... o~.. woo.o w... “mo.h .n.m «.o.h .m.hu vc.HA mm.h wow... .~O\oe. oucoeat n~.o we... an.c «an.» on.o “an.m av.o w-.. .m.o .o~.o .N.o «om.w an .mmww «A o w v N o mcavoom nouut mason an BNHO 0mm 00000 000 MZOH9<¢EZEUZOU (H20224 02¢ 0HU< rbh 02¢ .20 0H00h 20:00 .m 00019 45 levels at 4 hours after feeding. Butyrate concentration increased from a minimum at 0 hours post feeding and reached a maximum at 2 hours after feeding. Free Bacterial Colony Counts Free bacterial colony counts for sheep 905 and 913 fed diets l, 2 and 3 are shown in Table 6. Diet effects (P<-25) were noted with diet 3 consistently having higher colony counts for each collection time. Colony counts decreased between 0 and 2 hours after feeding for diets l and 2, but remained relatively stable for diet 3. Colony counts increased between 2 and 8 hours post feeding for diet 1 and between 2 and 11 hours after feeding for diets 2 and 3. Maximum counts were obtained at 8 hours post feeding for diet 1 and at 11 hours after feeding for diets 2 and 3. Variation of free colony counts with time after feeding for individual sheep fed diets l, 2 and 3 are given in Figures 2, 3 and 4, respectively. For diet 1, both sheep exhibited a decrease in colony counts between 0 and 2 hours after feeding, reaching minimum values of 1.21 x 108/9 for sheep 905 and 0.83 x 103/9 for sheep 913. Colony counts from sheep 905 increased from 2 hours post feeding to a maximum value of 5.99 x 108/9 at 11 hours after feeding. Colony counts for sheep 913 increased from 2 hours after feeding, reaching a maximum level of 6.00 x 103/9 at 8 hours after feeding, and then decreased at 12 hours. For diet 2, free colony counts for both sheep decreased between 0 and 2 46 TABLE 6. FREE BACTERIAL COLONY COUNTS PER GRAM OF RUMEN CONTENTSa Hours After Feeding Diet 1 Diet 2 Diet 3 (108/9) 0 2.9610.67 6.03:0.07 13.2410.80 2 1.02:0.19 2.4810.06 l3.60:1.40 5 2.70:0.52 5.14:2.35 17.0024.89 8 4.8711.13 7.1411.51 20.90i10.58 11 4.6811.31 8.3420.68 22.96ill.76 Meanb 3.24:0.55 5.8310.79 17.5412.80 aMean and standard error for 2 sheep. bTreatment effects at P <.25. 47 H umflo 0mm ammnm 039 now musmucoo :mesm mo ammo mom mucooo mooHou HMflumuomm mmum .N ousofim AmmIv 02.0mm... mmbhz m2; up 3 O— 0 0 b 0 m V 1 . m ‘ ‘\\‘ .0. HI .\\\‘1§1§E§1§ MW .’ bingo-cocoon... IA ’ ’XH‘.‘ \\\ l m K ” \ m N ‘0. "‘ l O m“ l AUX l O m 8 I a m l.: is“. a; .325 8888...... now 9.25 48 N .020 so. soon. 039 new mucwucou :mEsm 00 Scam mom mucsoo chHou Howumuomm mmum .m wusmflm AwmI. 02.0mm“. Kuhn; m:2_._. Np —— Op 0 Q h 0 m V n N p _ . . _ . .1 . . . . . . o n. J . .nlu ..P 1 . o “L“‘.““ao 0 s N .\\. .2 .9 |_s.A \ ... I. \. 2 ‘\ 00000 / l ' O \\ oooooo O ‘\ 00000 ifl m n “ 00000 es. N “ 0000 i 0 II. \\ S “‘ 0000000 I h ‘\ ......0003‘0 x coco-30:23....- l 0 Ir ......z... 0 9! I o.h. 6 0.0. ...... n p 0 003.0 ...-.038! DOQ 3008” 49 m umwo 0mm ammnm 036 new mucwucou cwEDm mo Emuo Hmm mucsou wcoHOU Hmflumuomm wmuh .v musmflm AwmIv 02.0mm“. mm...m< USE. Np pp Op m m h w m Q n N p O 5/90L x smnoo ANO‘IOO ‘I. own .395 3:...- mOQ Qfimzw 50 hours post feeding, reaching minimum values of 2.42 x 108/9 for sheep 905 and 2.54 x 108/9 for sheep 913. Colony counts then increased between 2 and 11 hours post feeding for both lambs. Maximum counts obtained at 11 hours after feeding were 9.02 x 108/9 and 7.66 x 108/9 for sheep 905 and 913, respectively. Free colony counts for sheep fed diet 3 varied differently with time. Colony counts increased from a minimum value of 14.04 x 108/g at 0 hours to a maximum value of 34.72 x 108/9 at 11 hours post feeding for sheep 905. Free colony counts for sheep 913 reached a maximum level of 12.44 x 108/9 at 0 hours after feeding, gradually decreased to a minimum value of 10.32 x 108/9 at 8 hours post feeding and then increased at 12 hours. Bound Bacterial Colony Counts Bound bacterial colony counts for sheep fed diets 1, 2 and 3 are given in Table 7. Significant diet effects (P < .05) were observed with diet 3 consistently having higher colony counts for each collection time. Bound colony counts decreased between 0 and 2 hours after feeding for all three diets. Colony counts increased between 2 and 8 hours after feeding for diet 1, between 2 and 11 hours after feeding for diet 2 and remained relatively stable between 2 and 11 hours after feeding for diet 3. Minimum counts were obtained at 2 hours after feeding for diets 1 and 2, and 8 hours after feeding for diet 3. Maximum counts were observed at 8 hours for diet 1, 11 hours for diet 2 and 0 51 TABLE 7. BOUND BACTERIAL COLONY COUNTS PER GRAM OF RUMEN CONTENTSa Hours After Feeding Diet 1 Diet 2 Diet 3 1 (108/9) 0 4.651 1.59 7.01: 1.48 18.00t5.04 2 3.57:1.15 5.1010.28 15.251r 3.23 s 5.78:0.90 5.25:0.14 16.61i1.84 8 7.03: 2.80 6.5013.10 15.1211.” 11 6.57:1.77 8.1312.42 154513.31 Meanb 5.52:0.72 6.4010314 16.03i1.16 aMean and standard error for 2 sheep. bTreatment effects at P< .05. 52 hours after feeding for diet 3. Variation of bound colony counts with time for individual sheep fed diets l, 2 and 3 are shown in Figures 5, 6 and 7, respectively. For diet 1, decreases in bound colony counts between 0 and 2 hours after feeding were observed for both sheep. Colony counts increased from a minimum of 2.42 x 108/9 at 2 hours after feeding to a maximum of 6.68 x 108/9 at 5 hours after feeding and then decreased through the next two sampling times for sheep 905. For sheep 913, colony counts increased from a minimum of 4.72 x 108/9 at 2 hours post feeding to a maximum of 9.82 x 108/9 at 8 hours after feeding. For diet 2, bound colony counts for sheep 905 decreased from 0 hours post feeding to a minimum of 3.40 x 108/g at 8 hours after feeding and then increased to a maximum of 5.70 x 108/9 at 11 hours after feeding. Colony counts for sheep 913 decreased between 0 and 2 hours after feeding, reaching a minimum of 4.82 x 108/9 and then increased to a maximum of 10.55 x 108/9 at 11 hours after feeding. For diet 3, bound colony counts for sheep 905 reached a maximum of 14.77 x 108/9 at 5 hours after feeding and then decreased to a minimum of 11.84 x 108/9 at 11 hours post feeding. Bound colony counts for sheep 913 decreased from a maximum of 23.04 x 108/9 at 0 hours after feeding to a minimum of 17.03 x 108/g at 8 hours after feeding. 53 H uwflo com mmwsm 039 How mucwucoo :wEDm mo Emuw mom mucnou >COHOU HMflumuomm wcsom .m wusmflm AwmIv 02.0mm“. cub“; mus—F flu nu —.I my N IA 03...... ...-o 3.0.3.... \‘ N \‘000000 000000 I. \ 00.0 S \ x 00 \ 1 s L .... \ 08 0000 \ .. a .w ( L O p “~L ”PO Q°°£m 0300.08.00. now 300:” 54 m umflo pom amonm 039 new mucmucov :mEsm mo Emuu mom mucsoo >20Hoo Hmwuwuomm bosom .m whomflm AmmIv 02.0mm“. ”mm—...“: 92.... up : Op a w s 0 m v n N r O _ _ 0 _ 0 _ 0 — . . ..III—I 0 o nu l N -| AU ... 1 s m 00000000000000000000 00000020000000.0003:- J V m 0.000000 00.000... “.““’ 1 0000000000 80*“ 9 0.0000000000800000 m n O \\\ .1 0mm \ I S \\ I, s \ I X \\ 0.1 \\ 0 a 8 \i!\ mw “\\\‘\.\ o 0 0‘ F F 00.0 0.0 39.0 00000000000 DOG QfiOSW 55 m 0000 com ammnm 039 new mucmucou cmEsm mo Emuw Mom mucsou >coHOU Hmfluwuomm bosom AwmIV 02.0mm“. EMF“? wSE. N— pp Op m a N o m v n N p O O ..l O N .A O O n N II- S X L nu 8 l O ‘0 9o 0005 .0000000 DOG 300...” .5 wusmflm Variation of RNA-Protein Ratios with Time for Free Ruminal Bacteria RNA-protein ratios for free rumen bacteria from sheep fed diets l, 2 and 3 are given in Table 8. Significant treatment effects (P < .05) were observed, with diet 3 con- sistently having higher RNA-protein ratios for all sampling times. For diet 1, values increased from a minimum level at 0 hours after feeding to a maximum level 4 hours after feeding, and then decreased through 12 hours post feeding. For diet 2, values increased from a minimum at 0 hours post feeding to a maximum 4 hours after feeding. For diet 3, values increased to a maximum at 6 hours after feeding and then decreased to a minimum at 12 hours post feeding. Variation of RNA-protein ratios with time for free bacteria from individual sheep fed diets l, 2 and 3 are shown in Figures 8, 9 and 10, respectively. For diet 1, values for sheep 905, 913 and 900 (sheep 898 was off feed and not sampled) increased between 0 and 4 hours after feeding, reaching maximum values of .347, .297 and .325 for sheep 905, 913 and 900, respectively. Minimum values of. .244 and .254 were obtained at 12 hours after feeding for sheep 913 and 900 while a minimum value of .247 was obtained at 0 hours after feeding for sheep 905. For diet 2, RNA- protein ratios increased from a minimum of .230 at 0 hours after feeding to a maximum of .457 at 4 hours after feeding for sheep 905. For sheep 898, RNA-protein ratios increased between 0 and 2 hours after feeding, reaching a maximum of 56 TABLE 8 . 57 RNA-PROTEIN RATIOS FOR FREE RUMEN BACTERIA Hours After Feeding Diet la Diet 2b Diet 3b 0 @O‘IbN 10 12 Meanc 0.251i 0.003 0.289 i 0.004 0.323 i 0.010 0.311 1’ 0.012 0.309 t 0.013 0.291 i 0.007 0.260 1 0.008 0.290 1 0.006 0.245 1 0.022 0.314 1 0.016 0.344 i 0.040 0.268 1 0.035 0.313 1 0.024 0.269 1 0.018 0.265 i 0.019 0.288 1’ 0.011 0.3843 0.019 0.3571 0.032 0.3991 0.028 0.516i 0.140 0.471i 0.092 0.404i 0.029 0.3351 0.027 0.4091 0.025 aMean and standard error for 4 sheep, using calculated average values for 1 sheep. bMean and standard error for 4 sheep. cTreatment effects at P.:.05. 58 H umfla numb QmmLm Eoum maumuomm womb no“ mewumm :flmuoumldzm AwmIv 02.0mm“. EMF”; MEI. Np O— m o v N 00 com .325 “. firm QOwr-w .0000000. mow Qmwzw .m musmflm NIBlOHd/VNH 59 m 0809 pom mmwnm Eoum maumuomm mmum new moflumm aflououmu