CARBOHYDRATEINVOEVEMENTllfififlfiixfi’PflfiiflflfiG " (firTHEIUHERmeiCOCKROAGH, FERNiANEEAJWMEHCANA Ibesisforthebegreeef PM}. NHCHK¥HISHAIElfinnfi§fififv IflfifififiFGRANETT IQFI v I. .‘w1 ‘ ‘-_ ’ r... 7-, 4‘“ "U '3’ 31,51,313 ,1. mar-11m .1 .‘Micl‘iigan S ta t6 University I *— This is to certify that the thesis entitled Carbohydrate Involvement during DDT Poisoning of the American Cockroach, Periplaneta americana' presented by Jeffrey Granett has been accepted towards fulfillment of the requirements for Ph.D. degree in Entomology hhfiupnmuun Date May 19, 1971 0-7639 ABSTRACT CARBOHYDRATE INVOLVEMENT DURING DDT POISONING OF THE AMERICAN COCKROACH, PERIPLANETA AMERICANA By Jeffrey Granett In DDT-treated American cockroaches, Periplaneta americana, L. (Orthoptera:Blattidae), glycogen and trehalose concentrations were lowered over a relatively short time Span corresponding to the period from late hyperactivity to early prostration. Such a depletion corres- ponded with a peak in 14 14 C02 evolution from cockroaches receiving glucose- C injections. The depletion occuned even after supplemental injections of up to 6 mg trehalose per cockroach were made, but was delayed by a rise in temperature. Dieldrin and propoxur poisoning caused a similar carbohydrate depletion. In DDT-poisoned cockroaches carbohydrate depletion is proposed as a link between the effect of DDT on the nervous system and the response by the other tissues of the insect to the insecticide. Serum from DDT-prostrate cockroaches injected into previously untreated cockroaches caused an increase in the trehalose content. This was not observed with serum from DDE-treated cockroaches. This hyper- glycemic activity is present in serum mainly from the prostrate stages of DDT poisoning. The factor is stable to heating and is stable at room temperature for as long as four hours. The active fractions from Jeffrey Granett molecular sieve chromatography are distinct from the bulk of the serum protein. The physiological significance of this factor is discussed. CARBOHYDRATE INVOLVEMENT DURING DDT POISONING OF THE AMERICAN COCKROACH, PERIPLANETA AMERICANA By Jeffrey Granett A Thesis Submitted to Michigan State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Department of Entomology 1971 A one-foot waterfall- it too makes noises, and at night is cool. Issa to my parents, Sandy and the future. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I wish to express my sincere thanks to Dr. Norman C. Leeling, my professor, who advised me and has had long-standing patience with me and this work. I wish to acknowledge the sequential financial assistance of a Title IV, National Defense Education Act Fellowship, a National Science Foundation Fellowship and an Entomology Department assistantship. For the two years of happiness during which the work for this thesis was done I wish to acknowledge the diligent cooperation of my wife, Sandy. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS LITERATURE REVIEW.. ..... ............................. .......... ......1 I. Trehalose in Insects ............................ . ...... .......l A. Trehalose Levels. ............. . .......... . ..... . .......... B. Functions of Trehalose... ...... ................... ..... ... l. Trehalose Utilization during Insect Development....... 2. Trehalose and Insect Flight........................... 3. Circadian Fluctuations in Trehalose Levels.... ...... .. 4. Cut Absorption of Carbohydrates....................... C. Trehalose Metabolism...................................... 1. Synthesis and Breakdown of Trehalose.................. 2. Regulation of Trehalose Levels........................ a. Feedback Control.................................. b. Hormonal Control....... .......... ......... ..... ... PmWUWWNNNI—‘H II. DDT........ ............. . ...... ..... ....................... ... U1 A. Introduction ...... .................... ..... ...............5 B. Mode of Action of DDT............................. ...... ..6 l. Symptoms..............................................6 2. Action on Nerves..... ........ ...... ........ ...........7 3. Biochemical Changes during DDT Intoxication...........8 4. Neurohormonal Involvement in DDT poisoning.... ...... .10 PART I. Trehalose and Glycogen Depletion during DDT Poisoning of American Cockroaches, Periplaneta americana.................12 I. Materials and MethodS........................ ....... .........13 II. Results... .................... .............. ......... . ....... 16 III. Discussion.................................. .......... .......27 PART II. A Hyperglycemic Factor in the Serum of DDT-Prostrate American Cockroaches, Periplaneta americana...... ..... .....31 I. Materials and Methods........................... ..... . ....... 32 II. ResultSOOOOOOOOO00.0.0.........OOOQOOI...00.0.00000000000000034 III. Discussion............. ...... ..... ........ ......... ...... ....43 iv Table of Contents (Continued) Page AN OVERVIEWCCCOOOCOO000...... ..... O. I. Interpretations of the Research... ...... . ..... ..............45 A. Experiments Concerning Carbohydrate Levels ........ ......45 B. Experiments Concerning the Hyperglycemic Factor.. ..... ..47 II. ExperimentSOOOO0.00.00.00.00.........OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO0.0.0048 . Lipid and Protein Levels ........... . ..... .... ........ ...48 . Additional Effects of the Factor.... ...... . ...... .......48 . ;3_Vitro Fat Body Bioassays..................... ..... ...49 . Chemical Characterization of the Factor.................49 Biological Characterization of the Factor...............49 NUCW> III. Significance of these Studies...............................50 LIST OF REFERENCES........... ............ ... LIST OF TABLES Table Page 1. Trehalose Levels in the Hemolymph of Treated American COCkrOaCheSooooooooooooo.0000.00000.000000ooooooooooooooooooooo0.017 2. Trehalose and Glycogen Levels after DDT and DDE Treatments of American COCkroaChesoOOCOO0.00.00.00.00.0.00.00...00.0.0000000000018 3. Trehalose and Glycogen Levels in DDT- and DDE-treated American Cockroaches after Trehalose Injections...................22 4. Trehalose and Glycogen Levels in Dieldrin- and Propoxur- treated American COCkroaChes...00............OOOOOOOOOOOOOCOO.....28 5. Hyperglycemic Activity of Serum from DDT-prostrate Cockroaches D11UtedW1th Ringer's saline.00.000.000.000...0.00.00.00.00000000040 vi LIST OF FIGURES Figure Page 1. 2. Glycogen and Trehalose during DDT Treatment as Percent of DDE-treated Control Cockroaches...................................20 The Effect of a Temperature Rise on Trehalose and Glycogen Levels in DDT-treated American Cockroaches........................24 Difference Between 14CO Respired from DDT- and DDE-treated American Cockroaches In acted with Glucose-14C as a Percent Of TOtal DPM'S InjeCtedOOOOOOOOO...0.0.0....0.0.00.00000000000000026 The Level of Trehalose in Cockroaches Treated with Serum from DDT-proStrate COCkroaCheSCOOOIOOOOO0..........OOOOO...O.O.O0.0.0.036 Hyperglycemic Activity from Serum of Cockroaches in Different DDT P01soning StageSIOOOOOOOOOOOOOO......OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO0.00.00039 Sephadex Chromatography of the Hyperglycemia Factor...............42 vii LITERATURE REVIEW 1. Trehalose in Insects A. Trehalose Levels Wyatt and Kalf (1957) reported the presence of trehalose in representatives of five orders of insects. In four lepidopterous species trehalose comprised 90% of the total hemolymph carbohydrates. Concentrations in the plasma ranged from 306 mg percent (mg per 100 m1) trehalose in the oriental silkworm larva, Bombyx mori, to 1398 mg percent in the silk moth, Telea polyphemus. Evans and Dethier (1957) reported a range of 200 to 3000 mg percent trehalose in the hemolymph of the blowfly, Phormia regina. Steele (1963) found an average of 1070 mg percent trehalose in the American cockroach, Periplaneta americana. Contrary to the high level of trehalose present in most insects, Barlow and House (1960) found that only 1 to 2 percent of the carbohydrates in the hemolymph of the parasitic fly larvae, Agria affinis, was trehalose; glucose accounted for 80% of the carbohydrates. Hansen (1964) found no trehalose in the hemolymph of locusts, but detected high levels of maltose, cellobiose, or other sugars depending on the diet. B. Functions of Trehalose Trehalose, as the predominant carbohydrate in the hemolymph of most insects, is comparable to glucose in mammalian systems and serves as a mobile source of energy (Wyatt and Kalf, 1957; Chefurka, 1965). Utilization of trehalose has been studied during various physiologic 2 activities. Discussed here will be 1) trehalose utilization during development, 2) utilization in flight, 3) levels at different times of day and 4) the effect of gut absorption on hemolymph trehalose levels. 1. Trehalose Utilization during Insect Development Between the pupal and adult stages of several silkworm Species the trehalose level decreases by one-half (Wyatt and Ralf, 1957). Candy and Kilby (1962) suggest that this drop may be a result of chitin synthesis, although their proposed pathway does not necessarily indicate this. Diapause hormone injected into silkworm pupae enhances gg_ggyg synthesis of trehalase (the enzyme hydrolyzing trehalose to glucose) in pupal ovaries, resulting in higher ovarian glycogen levels (Yamashita and Hasegawa, 1967). Similar effects are shown by pupae injected with ecdysone or cholesterol subsequent to excision of the supraeosophageal ganglia (Kobayashi gt 31., 1967). 2. Trehalose and Insect Flight During flight the rate of glycogen decrease in the fat body of Drosophila is directly proportional to the wing-beat frequency (Williams $5.21,, 1943). Clegg and Evans (1961) extended this correlation to the trehalose of the hemolymph with the observation that high trehalose concentrations accompany high wing-beat frequencies. They hypothesized that the source of this trehalose was fat body glycogen and dietary monosaccharides. 3. Circadian Fluctuation in Trehalose Levels Nowosielski and Patton (1964) reported peak hemolymph trehalose concentrations in the house cricket,Gryllus domesticus,at 3 hours before dawn (in a 12 hour day). 4. Gut Absorption of Carbohydrates The absorption of various sugars through the gut and their in- corporation into hemolymph trehalose and fat body glycogen was studied in Bombyx mori by Horie (1960). Sugars which increased the trehalose level also increased fat body glycogen. Treherne (1958a and b) observed in the locusg,Schistocerca gregarigdthat sugars are mainly absorbed by diffusion through the midgut caecae and to a lesser extent through the ventriculus. Once in the hemolymph the sugars are rapidly converted to trehalose, providing a steep glucose concentration gradient between the hemolymph and the gut lumen for the absorption of dietary glucose. C. Trehalose Metabolism 1. Synthesis and Breakdown of Trehalose Trehalose in insect hemolymph may be cleaved at the cell membrane into two glucose moieties by trehalase. This enzyme has been isolated and purified from a number of insects (Howden and Kilby, 1956; Friedman, 1960; Derr and Randall, 1966). In trehalose synthesis UDP-glucose and glucose-6-ph03phate form trehalose-6-ph08phate which is then hydrolyzed by trehalose phOSphate phosphatase to yield trehalose (Chefurka, 1965). 2. Regulation of Trehalose Levels Synthesis of trehalose and glycogen in the insect is competitive. The balance of the two is under feedback and hormonal control. a. Feedback Control Excess trehalose inhibits the incorporation of glucose into trehalose and stimulates its incorporation into glycogen in ig_vitro fat body incubations (Murphy and Wyatt, 1965). It is believed that trehalose is an allosteric inhibitor of trehalose phoSphate synthetase, binding to a site on the enzyme that is separate from the catalytic site. The inhibition can be eliminated by mild protein denaturation. Trehalose activation of glucose-6-phoSphate hydrolysis in fat body extracts of the blowfly, Phormia regina, was demonstrated by Friedman (1967a). Since glucose-6-phosphate is required for trehalose synthesis the net affect is to inhibit trehalose synthesis. b. Hormonal Control Steele (1961) extracted a hyperglycemic factor from the corpus cardiacum of the American cockroach, Periplaneta americana. When injected into other cockroaches, this extract increased the hemolymph trehalose 150 percent within 5 hours, increased inorganic phosPhate release into the hemolymph and loweredthe amount of glycogen in the fat body (Steele, 1963). Steele suggested that this hormone, thought to be peptidyl in nature, affected the phosphorylase activity. Ralph and McCarthy (1964) in similar experiments found that the hyperglycemic factor was present in the corpus cardiacum, brain, corpus allatum, and subeosophageal ganglion (in order of decreasing activity). Bowers and Friedman (1963) noted a hyperglycemic hormone in the cockroach, Blaberus discoidalis. Migliori Natalizi and Frontali (1966) isolated two such factors from the corpus cardiacum of the American cockroach and head homogenates of the honeybee, Apis mellifera. Migliori Natalizi 25,11. (1970) purified one from a corpus cardiacum extract from American cockroaches using Sephadex column chromatography and demonstrated trypsin sensitivity. Brown (1965) isolated two factors with similar activity from an American cockroach extract by paper chromatography. These factors were also trypsin sensitive and presumed to be low molecular weight polypeptides. Friedman (1967b) found that the hyperglycemic hormone was inactive in blow flies fed ag_libitum, but was active if they were starved. He suggested that the trehalose synthesis system normally works at full capacity as governed by the feedback inhibition of trehalose synthesis. When the trehalose concentration is low and there are abundant sugars from the gut, these sugars are efficiently converted into trehalose. During starvation, however, glycogen breakdown is the rate-determining factor of trehalose formation; so Friedman hypothesized that the hormone acts on glycogen breakdown. Wiens and Gilbert (1967) studied the effect of the hyperglycemic hormone on phoSphorylase activity and the respiration of igflyiggg fat body preparations. They hypothesized several sites of hormone action, including; a) an increase of phosPhofructokinase activity, b) inhibition of glycolysis by pentose phosphate cycle acceleration, c) hexokinase activation and d) trehalose-6-ph08phate synthetase activation. II. DDT A. Introduction Although DDT was first synthesized in 1894 by Zeidler, its insec- dcidal properties were not established until 1939 by P. Muller of the Geigy Chemical Corporation. Widespread and continued use came after World War 11 due to DDT's low cost, extremely wide Spectrum of insect- icidal activity, stability and low acute mammalian toxicity. This stability and DDT's lipid solubility leads to its accumulation in the environment and storage in animal adipose tissue. In recent years, fear of chronic poisoning by DDT has caused controversy and as a result it has been banned for many uses in several states and countries. However, the continued study of DDT, even though its use is declining, is of more than academic interest. First, DDT is indis- pensible in certain applications and in countries less technically developed than the United States. It will be used in significant quantities for a long time. Secondly, DDT and its metabolite DDE are some of the most wideSpread environmental contaminants and will be prevalent for many years even if the environmental input should be halted immediately. Thirdly, the action of DDT in organisms appears to affect basic animal processes. An understanding of DDT's action may thus give information on these biological systems. B. Mode of Action of DDT 1. Symptoms The acute toxicity of DDT to insects is attributed to the chemical's action on the nervous system reflected in the behavior of the poisoned insects. The abnormal neuronal activity results in tremors, hyperactivity, ataxia and eventual paralysis. Roeder and Weiant (1946) found that the sensory nerves were the most sensitive part of the nervous system to DDT. They also described the high- frequency trains of spike potentials caused by DDT in the axons of cockroach legs. Increases in respiration rates due to DDT were described by Ludwig (1946), Lord (1949) and Harvey and Brown (1951). Also, weight loss and water loss occurred with DDT poisoning (Ludwig, 1946) and heart beat frequency was affected (Patel and Cutkomp, 1967). 2. Action on Nerves The mode of action of DDT on nerves has been studied intensively. O'Brien (1967) summarizes some of these studies. Several areas of DDT's action have been further explored since O'Brien's review. The hypothesis of the charge-transfer complex of DDT with nerve proteins first described by O'Brien and Matsumura (1964) was essentially refuted by Hatanaka g£.gl. (1967). They found that binding of DDT was non-Specific and occurred with rat liver, muscle and brain in addition to cockroach nerve cord. In addition, the relatively non-toxic surfactant Triton X-100 mimicked the tissue binding effect. Brunnert and Matsumura (1969) revived the charge-transfer complex hypothesis on the basis of competition studies between DDE and DDT. A small portion (6%) of a 5 nmole DDT solution was bound to a site in the synaptic junction different from the DDE binding site. Some of the above work was done with rat brain fractions. Similar preparations were used also for studies with ATPase. Matsumura and Patil (1969) reported that DDT inhibited the Na+, K+, Mg2+-adenosine triphOSphatase found in a fraction of rat brain. The inhibition by DDT was about 1000 times higher than that by DDE. In addition, the inhibition was greater at low temperatures, a phenomenon resembling the negative temperature coefficient of DDT toxicity. However, the validity of this work has been questioned by Akera g£_gl. (1971) who found high inhibition with DDE as well as with DDT. They suggested that the contradictory results were due to the low enzyme activity in the preparations used in the earlier work. 3. Biochemical Changes during DDT Intoxication Tobias £5 11. (1946) noted that free acetylcholine in the nervous system of DDT-prostrate flies and cockroaches increased 200 percent while the bound acetylcholine decreased. However, the acetylcholine- forming enzymes were unaffected. Lewis (1953) substantiated the higher acetylcholine levels in DDT-prostrate house flies. In 1960 Lewis gtflgl. found that this rise in acetylcholine was similar to that observed under physically-induced prostration. The magnitude of the acetylcholine increase could be correlated with the degree of neuro- muscular activity before prostration. They suggested that the rise was due to release of bound acetylcholine from the axons. The rise could not be attributed to increased activity of the acetylcholine synthe- sizing enzymes, choline acetylase or acetylkinase (Rothschild and Howden, 1961). Interpreting data of Sternburg and Hewitt (1962), Winteringham (1966) concluded that DDT poisoning increases acetylcholine turnover in the insect ventral nerve. The high concentrations of amino acids in insect hemolymph lend themselves nicely to monitoring for possible changes resulting from insecticide poisoning. Winteringham (1958) reported accumulation of glutamine in the hemolymph, arising possibly through transamination. Cline and Pearce (1963) found that DDT interfered primarily with proline, formate and glycine metabolism in house flies. A greater 14C was converted into uric acid and percentage of injected formate- allantoin than into proline in DDT-poisoned insects. They noted that a carbamate insecticide did not affect formate metabolism. Corrigan and Kearns (1963) found that injected proline-14C was oxidized to carbon dioxide three times faster in DDT-poisoned than in control American cockroaches. Also it was metabolized to glutamine-14 C which Wintering- ham (1958) had suggested might be an ammonia trap for amino acid oxidation. Corrigan and Kearns also suggested that the demand for oxidizable carbon shifted metabolism to proline. In 1966 Cline and Pearce confirmed the drop in proline by radiotracer studies with house flies. In addition they found a decrease in radiolabelled trehalose after glucose-14C injections in DDT-treated insects as compared to solvent-treated controls. Patel $5.11. (1968) surveyed all the amino acids and found that their average concentrations decreased 22.7 percent in the ovaries of DDT-poisoned susceptible house flies as opposed to a 5.5 percent increase in poisoned resistant flies. Several papers have reported a drop in carbohydrates during DDT poisoning in insects. This was reviewed in the introduction to Part I of this thesis. There has also been considerable work on intermediary energy metabolism during DDT poisoning. Winteringham _£.gl. (1960) reported significant breakdown of about 20% of the thoracic ATP in DDT-poisoned flies. The ATP drop and prostrate symptomology was reversed by injection of glucose. Sparing the insect hypermotor activity during DDT poisoning by the use of anesthesia did not sustain the ATP level. With DDT poisoning they also saw a drop in L-t-glycero- phosphate and phospholipids at prostration. Agosin gt 31. (1961 and 1963) studied the influence of DDT on intermediary carbohydrate metabolism in Triatoma infestans. They found that DDT (as well as non-toxic DDE) inhibited anaerobic glycolytic pyruvate production by cell-free preparations. DDT enhanced incorporatflnn of glucose into carbon dioxide, glycogen and fatty acids while DDE did not. Glucose oxidation via the pentose phOSphate pathway amounted to 10 77 percent in DDT-treated insects compared to 22 percent in normal insects. Plapp (1970) confirmed this increase in the pentose pathway in house flies. However, Ela £5 31, (1970) found no increase in the pentose phoSphate pathway over the glycolytic pathway with DDT poisoning in cockroaches. In Triatoma DDT increased the NADP level, but not the NADP/NADPH ratio, possibly because of increased NAD-kinase. The increased NAD- kinase is thought to be related to detoxification of DDT and resistance (Ilevicky g£_§l,, 1964). Increased glutathione turnover (glutathione is necessary for activity of DDT-dehydrochlorinase, a detoxifying enzyme) and increased protein synthesis are also related to DDT poisoning in resistant house flies (Agosin 95.31., 1966). 4. Neurohormonal Involvement in DDT Poisoning Sternburg and Kearns (1952) found that the hemolymph of DDT- poisoned cockroaches, when injected into normal insects, produced DDT poisoning symptoms. Since the injected hemolymph did not contain sufficient DDT to cause the symptoms, they concluded that the DDT had induced production of a neurotoxic factor. Using electrophysiological preparations, this toxin was found to cause multiple firing in ganglia and sensory nerve fibers. It was unstable in the hemolymph, but was dialyzable and stable in the dialysate (Shankland and Kearns, 1959). Furthermore, it was found that body stress, such as physical immobil- ization, forced movement or electrical stimulation produced similar (although not necessarily identical) substances which also caused DDT-like symptoms and paralysis in unpoisoned insects (Beament, 1958; Heslop and Ray, 1959). Cook t al. (1969) proposed that their Factor S derived from nerve cords and heads of normal and stressed 11 American cockroaches may be a neurohormone, transmitter or modulator substance and may be identical to the neurotoxin of Sternburg _£__1, (1959). The production and release of this type of substance was observed histochemically in the corpus cardiacum (Hodgson and Geldiay, 1959). With parabiosis experiments, Colhoun (1960) showed that the toxin was not the primary cause of the DDT-induced death. Isolation and identification of the toxins are difficult because of the small quantities present in the insects. Sternburg (1960) tried to solve this problem by using crayfish which are considerably larger than insects and produce similar toxins. He found that the toxin was not a known neurohumoral agent or a DDT metabolite. Hawkins and Sternburg (1964) partially identified it as an aromatic amine, possibly an ester. Patel and Cutkomp (1968) established that the substance was fluorescent and therefore easily detectable. It was not produced by insects treated with certain organophOSphate insecticides and therefore is not a dying tissue response. Davey (1963) found that enforced activity of cockroaches also released a cardiac stimulator in the hemolymph. The literature on such toxins is reviewed by Sternburg (1960 and 1963). PART I Trehalose and Glycogen Depletion during DDT Poisoning of American Cockroaches, Periplaneta americana Carbohydrate levels in DDT-poisoned insects were investigated during the initial research on this insecticide. Ludwig (1946) showed a drop in glycogen and glucose in insects during DDT poisoning. Merrill g£.§l, (1946) did further work on the carbohydrate depletion including experiments using anesthesia and glucose injections as possible antidotes to the insecticide's activity. They concluded that the depletion of carbohydrates did not play a primary role in the action of DDT. However, their paper did not include complete data on symptom- ology of the insects. Winteringham (1956) similarly did not report symptomology in full, although he agreed that the carbohydrate drop was not a primary cause of death. Heslop and Ray (1959) suggested that a biochemical lesion was the cause of the decrease in energy compounds. Cline and Pearce (1966) found that trehalose-14C, 14 the major metabolite of injected glucose- C, was greatly reduced in DDT-treated NAIDM flies. This paper presents detailed data on carbohydrate depletion during DDT poisoning and some evidence for the cause of this depletion. Although it may not be the primary cause of death, the carbohydrate depletion must be considered significant to the understanding of what happens biochemically during the dying process of insects and may directly or indirectly be associated with the other factors character- izing the DDT poisoning syndrome. 12 13 I. Materials and Methods Adult male American cockroaches, Periplanteta americana (L.) maintained under a daily 16 hr photophase were the experimental animals. They were given Purina Dog Chow® and water £51 libitum. The cockroaches were treated with the following insecticides and analogs: p,p'DDT (99%, City Chemical Corp., New York, N. Y.); p,p'DDE, 98%, propoxur (97%, o-isopropoxyphenyl methylcarbamate [Baygodgy, Pesticide Repository, USPHS, Pesticide Research Laboratory, Perrine, Fla.); and dieldrin (99+%, Shell Chemical Co., New York, N. Y.). Treatments were topical on the ventral portion of the abdomen in 10 or 20 ’11 acetone as stated in each experiment. After treatment the cockroaches were kept in battery jars with pressboard partitions. No food was available, but humidity was maintained with a damp paper towel. In experiments with DDT the cockroaches were sampled at times determined by symptoms the DDT-treated groups showed. Terminology used in this paper to describe the stages of poisoning was modified from Heslop and Ray (1959). Initial tremors denotes the first stage of poisoning when the insect is slightly ataxic and shows slight tremors. During the tremors stage, all appendages are in continual nervous motion. In the hyperactivity stage the insect exhibits continual walking and running, with occasional convulsions. The late hyperactilg stage indicates a slowing, with the insect having little control over its movements. Tremors are continuous. During the prostrate stage the insect cannotright itself, but has continual tremors. In the late prostrate stage all movements have ceased except for occasional, but slight, twitching. Except for the experiments where cockroaches were sampled hourly, the stages of hyperactivity and late prostration were 14 found to be convenient for the sampling of groups for carbohydrate determinations. At 24°C with 50-100 Pg DDT per cockroach, typical hyperactivity symptoms appeared 3-5 hr after treatment and prostration occurnxibetween 8 and 12 hr after treatment. Hemolymph for trehalose assays was obtained from the cockroaches by cutting appendages (antennae, tarsi, cerci, Styli and phallomeres) and collecting with a capillary pipette the droplets formed. Samples were immediately frozen with dry ice. The hemolymph was lyOphilized and then suSpended in 2 ml 60% ethanol. The anthrone colorimetric test for trehalose was run according to Wyatt and Kalf (1957) and the results presented as mg trehalose per mg dry hemolymph. These qual- itative and quantitative determinations were confirmed by formation of the trimethylsilyl derivatives (Sweeley g£_gl., 1963) and analysis by GLC using a 6 ft x k in. stainless steel column of 3% OV-l on 100/120 mesh Gas Chrom Q, isothermally at 220°C with 40 m1/min helium flow and flame ionization detection. Cellobiose was used as an internal standard and the peaks were quantitated by peak height ratios. This column resohed derivatives of cellobiose, maltose and trehalose from each other and from derivatives of monosaccharides for identification purposes. In addition, trehalose was distinguishable from either cellobiose or maltose alone because of its single peak. Glycogen and trehalose were extracted from homogenates of whole cockroaches. Groups of 3-7 cockroaches were homogenized 15 min in a Lourdes Model MM-l homogenizer in 15 ml 10% trichloroacetic acid. The homogenates were centrifuged at 10,000 g for 15 min, the pellet resus- pended in 5 ml water and the centrifugation repeated. Glycogen was precipitated from a 2 m1 aliquot of the combined Supernatant 15 1 ml saturated Na2304 and 13 ml 95% ethanol. The preparation was kept at -20°C overnight, the tubes centrifuged in a clinical deskrtop cen- uifuge and the supernatant containing the mono- and disaccharides removed. The precipitate containing glycogen was resuspended in 10 ml 95% ethanol, kept at -20°C for 2 hr and centrifuged again. The ethanol precipitate from the 2 centrifugations was dried and resuSpended in 2 ml water. Glycogen was determined by an anthrone test (Morris, 1948). Standards were prepared containing glycogen and Na2SO4 equal to that in the sample tubes. Trehalose was determined in the combined ethanol supernatants. A 2 m1 aliquot was dried and the trichloroacetic acid removed by rinsing twice with 10 ml anhydrous diethyl ether. The samples were then derivatized and chromatographed as described previously. In one set of experiments, trehalose was injected into DDT-treated and control cockroaches. A series of one, two or three injections of trehalose (2 mg/20 P1 water per injection) was made at 3 hr intervals beginning with the first hyperactive symptoms shown in the DDT-treated groups. Carbohydrate levels were determined at late prostration. A set of experiments was run in which DDT- and DDE-treated cockroaches were held initially at 18°C. When the DDT-treated group showed late hyperactive symptoms, groups from both treatments were placed at 33°C until late prostration symptoms were shown by the DDT-treated groups. At intervals, samples were taken and carbohydrate levels determined as described previously. A series of reapirometry studies measured 14C02 after the injection of 20 P1 of uniformly labelled glucose-14C (0'0255.PCi/0’5 mg glucose per 20 Pl water per cockroach). The respired 14C02 was bubbled through 10 ml of monoethanolamine:ethyleneglycol monomethyl ether (1:2, v/v) and 16 collected hourly. In these experiments, 10 cockroaches were used per treatment of DDT or DDE. The insects were treated with the chemicals 2 hr after the glucose injections. Two other insecticides, dieldrin and propoxur, were used in some experiments. Acetone was used as the solvent and for the control treatments. Trehalose and glycogen were determined as described previously when the poisoned insects reached a prostrate stage. II. Results At DDT-induced late prostration, the trehalose in the hemolymph had decreased 7-8 fold compared to that of cockroaches treated with DDE or controls sampled simultaneously (Table 1). All treatments showed higher trehalose values at the hyperactive stage than the controls with no acetone treatment. Table 2 shows comparable results for homogenates of whole cock- roaches treated with DDT, DDE and acetone. Both trehalose and glycogen were depleted in the DDT-treated cockroaches at late prostration. In these cases, the levels in DDE-treated insects were essentially the same as those for the acetone-treated controls. Because of this similarity, further tests used only the DDE-treated cockroaches as controls. The hyperactive cockroaches in these experiments showed no difference in the carbohydrates among treatments. Figure 1 depicts the depletion of the carbohydrates with time and the symptomology of the cockroaches treated with 50 Pg DDT or DDE in 10 P1 acetone/cockroach at 23°C. Each value represents 3-5 groups of 5 cockroaches each and was calculated by dividing the values for the DDT treatments by the DDE values and plotting as percent versus time. 17 Table l. Trehalose levels in the hemolymph of treated American cockroaches. mg trehalose/mg dry hemolymphI: S.E.b Treatmenta Hyperactive Late prostrate stagec stage DDT 0.17 i 0.03 0.02 i 0.01 DDE .16 j; .02 .12 i .02 Acetone .17 i .02 .12 i .02 Control .11 i .01 .10 i .01 8Treatments were 48 Pg DDT or DDE/10 P1 acetone or 10 ’11 acetone alone topically per cockroach. The control was without any treatment. Temperature was 25°C. bEach value represents 5-7 groups of 5 cockroaches each. c Stage refers to the time these symptoms were shown by DDT- treated cockroaches. 18 Table 2. Trehalose and glycogen levels after DDT and DDE treatments of American cockroaches. Trehalose Glycogen (mg/g wet weight i S.E.)b (mg/g wet weight 1 S.E.)b Treatmenta Hyperactivec Late prostratec Hyperactivec Late prostratec DDT 3.1 i 0.27 0.15 i 0.07 3.7 i 0.32 0.17 i 0.02 DDE 3.1 i .24 2.80: .27 3.4: .32 3.40: .31 Acetone 2.8 i .23 2.70 i .24 3.6 i .45 2.90 i .65 aTreatments were 50 lg DDT or DDE/10,11 acetone or 10 P1 acetone alone per cockroach. Temperature was 23°C. bEach value represents 3-7 groups of 5 cockroaches each. CStage refers to the time these symptoms were shown by DDT- treated cockroaches. 19 Figure l. Glycogen and trehalose during DDT treatment as percent of DDE-treated control cockroaches. Vertical lines indicate half standard errors. amusord ago-3 -o- Trehalose -x- Glycogen aim isord T X annealed/(H 9401 l—x - angiooladKH V 4 o —4 . SJOLUOJi SJOUJOJl gougul —">" 23’ ‘ .E.’ / ... ——'Il_x d L 1 1 l J l o o o o o O 0 O <_:- y o no so