A STUDY OF THE RELATIQN'SHIPS BETWEEN KNOWLEDGE OF CHILD GRQWI'I-I PRINCIPLES AND THEIR APPLICATIONS IN MULTIPLE - GRADE IEACHING IN CERTAIN COUNTIES IN NEBRASKA, SOUTH DAKQTA. AND MICHIGAN Thesis Ior “19 Degree of Ed. D. MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY Lula R. Way 1958 llea'“ M I . 1, N3. I? .4 1-2 Y—LII ,. I. \ : “' w I ' \ I‘Vv. . p.21 l‘ttlu, i I Ur“ WNW .A% -t e > (J This is to certifg that the thesis entitled "A Study of the Relationships Between Knowledge of Child Growth Principles and Their Applications in Multiple-Grade Teaching in Certain Counties in Nebraska, South Dakota, and Michigan." presented by Lula R. Way has been accepted towards fulfillment of the requirements for Ed.D. degree in Foundations of Education [71/ gazetted Major professor Datelfi‘w ‘1 I’If/ /75’J/ 0-169 A STUDY OF THE RLLATIONSHIPS BETWEEN KNOWLEDGE OF CHILD GROWTH PRINCIPLES AND TELIH APPLICATIONS IN MULTIPLE- GRADE; ’l‘ILACIiIIIG III CEHTnlN COUNTIES IN I'IbBIKASKA, SOUTH DAKOTA, AND MICHIGAN By LULA F. . my A THiSIS Submitted to the School for Advanced Graduate Studies of Michigan State University of Agriculture and Applied Science in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF EDUCATION School of Education 1958 ABSTRACT A STUDY OF THE RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN KNOdLbDGE OF CHILD GROWTH PRINCIPLES AND THEIR APPLICATIONS IN MULTIPLE- GRADE TEACHING IN CERTAIN COUNTIES IN NEBRASKA, SOUTH DAKOTA, AND MICHIGAN This is a study of relationships between what teachers know in principle and what they do in practice concerning child growth. The findings of the study are bases upon: (1) a personal questionnaire used to determine the status of their training (2) a continuum type of reconstruction of their classroom techniques used to determine their application of child growth principles. Random sampling of teacher's names were drawn from county rosters in twelve north east Nebraska counties, two south east South Dakota counties and two Michigan counties. By mass tabulation a measure of how well or how poorly the child growth principles were being applied in the teaching of reading, arithmetic, social studies and natural science was obtained. By individual tabulations it was possible to obtain a judgement of how well any one teacher was applying what she knew of child growth principles in any one or all four areas represented on the continuum. Thus the study had both cross-sectional and longitudinal aspects. The major relationships indicated by the study were: (1) reading is being taught with little application of current child growth principles and with but little evidence of progression in method 11 (2) there is more agreement of principle and practice with regard to arithmetic (3) natural science shows evidence of the impact of newer concepts of teaching methods and better application of current child growth principles (h) social science shows the greatest evidence of the application of current child growth principles and the use of good method I (S) supervision on a county wide basis has not been a determinite factor in the application or the non-application of child growth principles (6) the correlation of the age of the teacher and her ability to teach was negative (7) the correlation of the teacher's recency of training and her ability to teach was negative (8) the correlation of the number of college hours held by the teacher and her ability to teach was negative (9) the correlation of the extent of help the teacher felt her college classes had given her and her ability to teach was positive and significantly so at the five percent level (10) the correlation of the years of teaching eXperience to the ability to teach was positive but only slightly so (11) if one were desirous of picking a good teacher in all four areas of teaching he need only to know how the teacher teaches arithmetic to know how effectively current child growth principles were carried out in other areas of the curriculum iii AC KN O’I‘JLEDGI‘IE N TS The author wishes to acknowledge the helpful assistance given her by the county superintendents of schools involved in this study. Without their c00peration the high percentage of returns on the questionnaire and the continuum would not have been possible. She also wishes to acknowledge the assistance given by Mrs. E. M. Wooldridge in matters mathe- matical. To the graduate committee, Dr. Junge, Dr. Clark, Dr. Harper, Dr. Deitze and particularily to Dr. DeLong who gave much time during the initial stages of the study and to Dr. C. V. Millard who gave helpful suggestions throughout the study, the author is deeply indebted. iv TABLE: OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLSS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . LIST OF FIGURSS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Chapter I. INTRODUCTION. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . The Problem. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Statement ‘f the problem. . . . . . . . Region covered by the study . . . . . . Limitations of the study. . . . . . . . Need for the study. . . . . . . . . . . Definition Of Terms. . . . . . . . . . . . Rural . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Multiple-grade. . . . . . . . . . . . . Continuum . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . The Instruments Used In The Collection Of Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . The interview . . . . . . . . . . . . . The questionnaire . . . . . . . . . . . The continuum . . . . . . . . . . . . . Treatment Of The Data. . . . . . . . . . . II. EARLY AND MODERN CONCB‘TS IN T35 MULTI-GRADB IDhA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Method. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Teaching standards. . . . . . . . . . . Rumblings of new ideas. . . . . . . . . Child growth and deveIOpment impacts. . III. TECHNIQUES AND INSTRUMHNTS FOR DETERMINING THE IMPACT OF CHILD GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT OF EETHOD. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . The Sample . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . The Interviews . . . . . . . . . . . . . . The Questionnaire. . . . . . . . . . . . . Regarding age . . . . . . . . . . . . . Regarding marital status. . . . . . . . Regarding sex . . . . . . . . . . . . . Regarding teaching eXperience . . . . . Regarding the amount of college training . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Regarding the kind of college attended. Regarding the recency of training . . . V wwwwmww {\J N l-' I-' . OCOCDCOCO 11 12 lb. 4. 26 \Nkpbd \bkpenpxounntu $1P17unprvkw4 O‘U‘lU'l hapter Regarding course titles . . . . . . . . He¢arding extent of help. . . . . . . . he C Grit inllum ~ 0 o o o o o o o o o o o o 0 IV. ILSLTLTS OF THE STUDY. . . . . . . Organization Of Data . . . . . . . . . . . Presentation 0f Results. . . . . . . . Problem 1: Measure of use of child deveIOpment principles . . . . . . . . Problem 2: Measure of use of supervisor as indices of use of . child growth principles. . . . . . . . Problem 3: Correlation of the ability to incorporate child growth principles within subject matter areas as given in point 3 page 3 and the question- naire with various personal data ’ item.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . A sub problem of problem 3: The effectiveness of the teacher in more than one area of the continua . . A sub problem of problem 3: Deter— mining the prOgression on the contiinuui. . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . A sub problem of problem 3: Goodness of choice. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Problem a: Sinble indices from the questionnaire related to those who identified applications of good child growth principles in each of the aI‘etls o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o 0 V. CONCLUSIONS AND II PAIIC TIONS. . . . . . . . Conclusions. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Problem 1.. . O 0 O O O O O O 0 O O 0 Problem 2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Problem 3 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Problem ’4. o o o o o o o o o o o o o o 0 Implications For Research. . . . . . . . . BIBLImRA F191,. 0 o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o A}‘ PEI‘IDD: O O O O O O O 0 O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 O O 0 vi 62 63' 61'. 61+ 100 Table I. II. III. IV. V. VI. VII. VIII. X. XI. XII. XIII. XIV. LIST OF TAtILS Progression of Course Titles of the Nebraska State Teachers Colleges from 1930 to 1955. . . . PrOgression of Text Titles of the Nebraska State Teachers Colleges from 1930 to 1955. . . . General Growth Principles. Reading Continuum. . . . . Arithmetic Continuum . . . Social Science Continuum . Natural Science Continuum. The Distribution by County of the Composite Teaching Score in Four Areas of Teaching Juxtaposed to the Supervisory Factor . . . Placement of First, First and Second, and First, Second, and Third Choices on the Continuum in the Areas of Reading, Arithmetic, Social Science, and Natural Science. . . . . AXperience Distribution. . Age Distriblltion o o o o o I O O O O O O O O O Extent of Help Distribution. . . . . . . . . Number of College Hours Distribution . . . . Recency of Training Distribution . . . . . . vii Page ul fififi as 1+7 M3 61 65 7a so 81 82 Figure l. A 2. A 3. A u. A S. A 6. A 7. A 8. A 9. A LIST OF FIGURAS Histogram.Showing the Weighted Score in Ability to Choose and Place Correct Responses on the Reading Continuum. . . . . HistOgrwn Showing the Weighted Score in Ability to Choose and Place Correct ReSponses on the Arithmetic Continuum . . . Histogram Showing the Weighted Score in Ability to Choose and Place Correct Heeponses on the Natural Science Continuum. HistOgram Showing the Weighted Score in Ability to Choose and Place Correct Reaponses on the Social Science Continuum . HistOgram Showing the Totals in Weighted Scores of Ability to Choose and Place the Correct Response on the Four Continua: Reading, Arithmetic, Social Science, and Natural Science . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Line Graph Showing a Comparison of the Weighted Scores in Ability of 7MB Teachers to Place Correct Responses on a Continuum in Four Areas: Reading, Arithmetic, Social Science, and Natural Science. . . . . . . . Rectangular Graph Showing a Three Way Relationship in Ability to Place Responses One, Two and Three; One and Two; and One Respectively in Correct Order on the Reading Continuum . . . . . . . . . . . . . Rectangular Graph Showing a Three Way Relationship in Ability to Place Responses One, Two, and Three; One and Two; and One Respectively in Correct Order on the Arithmetic Continuum. . . . . . . . . . . . Rectangular Graph Showing a Three Way Relationship in Ability to Place Responses One, Two, and Three; One and Two; and One Respectively in Correct Order on the Social Science Continuum. . . . . . . . . . viii 53 SM 55 S6 57 58 66 67 68 Figgre 10. 11. l6. l7. l8. 19. 20. A Rectangular Graph Showing a Three Way Relationship in Ability to Place Reaponses One, Two, and Three; One and Two; and One Respectively in Correct Order on the Natural Science Continuum.. . . . . . . . . Age of the Cases Who Identified Good Teaching Practices in Reading (Choices One and Two in Correct Order) . . . . . . . . . . . . . Years of Teaching Experience of the Cases Who Identified Good Teaching Practices in Reading (Choices One and Two in Correct Order ) o o c o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o 0 Amount of College Training in Semester Hours of Cases Who Identified Good Teaching Practices in Reading (Choices One and Two in Correct Order) . . . . . . . . . . . . . Recency of Training of Cases Who Identified Good Teaching Practices in Reading (Choices One and Two in Correct Order). . . Course Titles Which Dealt with Growth Concepts in Teaching Reading. 80 Titlengiven by S7 TeaCheI’S o o o o o o o o 0 o o o o o o o Extent of Help in Teaching Which the College Courses Taken Were Considered to Have Given Age of the Cases Who Identified Good Teaching Practices in Arithmetic (Choices One and Two in Correct Order) . . . . . . . . . . . Years of Teaching Experience of the Cases Who Identified Good Teaching Practices in Arithnetic (Choices One and Two in Correct Order). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Amount of College Training in Semester Hours of Cases Who Identified Good Teaching Practices in Arithmetic (Choices One and Two in Correct Order) . . . . . . . . . . . Recency of Training of Cases Who Identified Good Teaching Practices in Arithmetic (Choices One and Two in Correct Order). . . ix Page 69 71 71 71 72 72 72 73 73 73 m Fiiure Pave 21. Course Titles Whicn Dealt with Handling Children in Teaching Arithnetic (Choices One and Two in Correct Order). lou Titles Given by 86 Teachers. . . . . . . . . . . . . 7h 22. Extent of Help in Teachin; Arithmetic Which the College Courses Were Considered to Have Given. 0 O O O O O O O I O O 0 O O O 0 O 714. 23. Age of the Cases Who Identified Good Teaching Practices in Social Sciences (Choices One and Two in Correct Order) . . . . . . . . . . 75 2h. Years of Teaching EXperience of the Cases Who Identified Good Teaching Practices in - Social Sciences (Choices One and Two in Correct Order). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7S [‘3 \fl 0 Amount of College Training in Semester Hours of Cases Who Identified Good Teaching Practices in Social Sciences (Choices One and Two in Correct Order) . . . . . . . . . . 75 26. Recency of Training of Cases Who Identified Good Teaching Practices in Social Sciences (Choices One and Two in Correct Order). . . . 76 27. Course Titles Which Dealt with Handling Children in Teachinb Social Sciences (Choices One and Two in Correct Order). 25h Course Titles Given by 229 Teachers. . . . . . . . . 76 28. Extent of Zelp in Teaching Social Sciences Eunich the College Courses Were Considered to Have Given . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7o 29. Age of the Cases Who Identified Good Teaching Practices in Natural Science (Choices One and Two in Correct Order). . . . 77 30. Years of Teaching EXperience of the Cases Who Identified Good Teaching Practices in Natural Science (Choices One and Two in Correct Order). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 77 31. Amount of College Training in Semester Hours of Cases Who Identified Good Teaching Practices in Natural Science (Choices One and Two in Correct Order) . . . . . . . . . . 77 >4 Figu'e 32. MC no; of Train Good Teachin5 (Choices One and Two in 33- Course Titles Wh 36. 39. Children in Teachin5 One and Two in in" Fla 1011 of Ca 8 s Vlo Ident Hfl’ cti<:.s n Natural Scien orrect Order O H. «D Dealt with Handling (C: [80 Natural Science (Choice Correct Order). h7h Titles Given b3, 367 Teachers 0 o o o o o o o o Sxte t of Help in Tea ching latura.l Science Which the Colle5e Courses here Considered to Have Given EXperience Distribution of the Respondin5 to Rural Teache rs South Ihduvta, A age Distribution in Tzelve Nebraska, Two South Dakota, the in and cf 0 O O O O O O O O O O 7L8 Cases twestionzuxirc Sr- nt to nglve Hfbraska, Two Two Michli 5an Countie the 7h8 Cases Responding to the ;ues tionnaire Sent to Rural Teach TWO 141C015 an counties 0 o o o o o o o o 8P8 and Extent of Help Distributian of the 7h8 Cases Resgnondin5 to ihlral.'"eache South.lT”'ota, St}: C in Sand (;l:e5vtinnI-1C«ire serlt t\) Twelve hcbraska, Two Two Michigan Counties I‘ILunber of Colle5e 310111.» of Trainmg Distribution of the 7’8 Cases RGSPOHdinE to the zinestionnaire Sent to Rural Teachers in Twelve Nebraska, Two South Dakota, and Two Michigan Counties Recency of Training Distribution of the 7h8 Cases Respondin5 to the Questionnaire Sent to Rural Teach South Dakota, 8 FL and in Twelve Nebraska, Two Two Michi 5an Counties S m 3D s 78 79 8O 81 82 83 CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION Like the cold relentless cut of a glacier American edu- cational practices have ground their way through the lives of the youth of this land. Every child is touched, for com- pulsion is behind the educational process. The school is one of the places where the educative process takes place, the teacher is one of the tools through which this process is brought to bear on the life of the child. Those engaged in teacher training like to think that efforts to teach 'about children' and 'methodology', to influence learning in the areas about which the child will be inquiring, are good eXperiences for the teacher in training and will in turn, cast their influence upon the child, who, day by day comes to the American classroom. Within a few short years, as time is calculated by eras, we, as a nation of adults and children have grown from agra- rian to urban. Even the home of the agrarian is, for the most part, urbanized. His community is no lOnger a closely knit well defined area and his school, generally Speaking, '18 not likely to be the same as it was thirty years ago. Yet there are some things about agrarian life that cannot be set down as synonymous to its urban counterpart. The facts that l land surrounds his abode, that unoccupied distances lie be- tween him, his neighbor, and his school connote among other things an educative process not wholly interchangeable with "urban education." Urban educational problems have been studied, and plans ihave been made to meet the immediate and long range needs of its patrons. Rural education has not had an equal share of ' rural education in sittention. Like the proverbial "Tepsy,' ‘bhe main has "just come up,” with little attention focused upon it . The Problem Statement_g£ the problem. Since the rural home and school are becoming less and less different from the urban licnne and school, most educators seem to think that rural edu- cation holds no distinctive principles. When the school, whether urban or rural, is the center of the problems, the (fliijld is of major concern. He is the common element. Within Use realm of generalities, the similarities of the rural and ‘mue urban schools are many. There are, however, certain areas where differences must be recognized to meet child éflfibulth concepts in multi-grade situations. It is the author's 3118 tained contention that these very differences become the basci<3 framework for maintaining satisfactory learning situ- ations in multiple-grade classrooms. This thesis purports: (l) to determine the existence cn' a~bsence of child growth and develOpment principles in classes taught in certain institutions wh re training for multiple-grade teaching is now available; (2) to describe the methodology used by those who are new teaching in multiple- grade situations then relate this methodology to good or poor attributes of teaching; and (3) to study the relationships which may exist between child growth knowledge and methodology as used in the classroom situations. Region covered by_thg study. This study is concerned with certain areas within three states where multiple-grade classrooms are in Operation, namely Nebraska, where such . schools are common indeed, two South Dakota counties which border Nebraska, and two selected counties in Michigan. Limitations 2£_the study. All the measuring instruments used in this study have'been calibrated to reveal conditions and practices as they actually exist, not as they are ideally recommended. Eggg’fgg_§§2.ggggy, Institutions providing training toward meeting teacher certification requirements must train both the teacher who expects to teach in graded and those who expect to teach in ungraded schools. The general tendency 1 toward larger school units and the phenomenal growth of urban systems2 have furnished the teacher training institutions with the needed impetus to center on and to emphasize in, its ‘ lBiennial Survey of dducation in the United States, Chapter 2, lth-hB, Statistics 2; State School S stems, Federal Security Agency, Office of Education, Washington, D. 0.: United States Printing Office, 1950, p. 12. 21bid., p. is, us. LL teacher trainihi probram, a curricular approach which best fits the needs of the urban teacher. Good educational practice set forth in texts studied by the teacher in training and the pupils in the classroom have come more and more to illustrate concepts and methods in single grade settings. This augmented and strengthened the training for the urban teacher. he a consequence, meager and rather apolOgetic efforts have been made to demonstrate, describe, or determine how these techniques would succeed in multiple-grade setting. Only Wofford3 and Bowenu have pub- lished books considered to be primarily designed for the multiple-grade setting. Many college catalodues list textbooks in rural educa— tion, but the two noted above are the only ones which bear late enough COpyright dates to be currently useful. Yet in the nation thirty-two out of every one hundred children are considered rural. In the three state area where this study was made the per cent is even higher: Nebraska has forty- nine per cent; South Dakota, forty-seven per cent; and Midhigan, thirty-nine per cent.5 The children represented by these stated percentages will either add to or subtract from the economy of each state. ‘ 3Kate Wofford, Teachin? in Small Schools, New York: The Macmillan Co., 94 . LLGenevieve Bowen, Living and Learning ifl.§ Small Rural School, New York: The Macmillan Co., IQDE. SBiennial Survey, 9p, cit., p. 63. 5 These children deserve "equal educational Opportunities" as set forth in the Charter 2f Education for guralChildren.6 Consequently we must still train teachers to teach in multi- ple—grade situations. The better this training is, the better will be our citizenry and the better will be the use to which our tax dollar can be put. There are two possible reasons for the sparcity of text materials on rural education: (1) the field of rural educa- tion has ceased to make evident to textbook publishers the need for such publications; or (2) the field has at its com- mand adequate teacher training materials. Concerning the first point, there are 93,000 one and two-teacher schools in operation and two and one quarter million children attending these schools.7 These statistics would have had considerable significance for the textbook publisher had they felt the demand from the training institutions for such materials.1 Concerning the second point, B. A. Dawson8 in a speech entitled ' states that the economic and "Trouble at the Crossroads,’ professional status of the rural teacher is more insecure than any other class of teacher in America. This statement seems to have escaped public and educational reaction. There is, then, a need to determine the present status of rural education, particularly as it is practiced in rela- ‘ 6National Education Association, The White House Confer- ence of Rural fiducation, Washington, D.C.: Department of Rural Education of the N. E. A., lth, p. lh-lS. 7Biennia Survey, 22! cit., Table 63. r . “National Education Association, 3p. cit., p. 37. ‘41.. - . tion to what the rural teacher knows about child growth and what she does with this knowledge to induce learning. In the process of attacking this problem, the writer felt that one major aspect of the study related to both child growth principles and methodology needed early attention: how do we account for the way teachers teach as they do? Is it because of (l) the type of supervision, (2) the courses they take in college, (3) the recency of their training, (h) the texts they used in college? A survey of the literature, as well as interviews with the peeple who teach child growth, was summarized to establish the concepts of child growth.9 Next, the twenty-seven super- intendents of county school systems in northeast Nebraska were contacted and by interview were asked the questions upon which the Kreitlow10 Rural Education PhiloSOphy Scale was 11 structured. The findings were categorized to ascertain the philOSOphical leaning which their supervision would quite. surely take.12 Armed with these two results, the writer then began the task of establishing the parameters of the study itself.13 In the establishment of this process rural teachers in twelve 9Appendix F. 10Burton Kreitlow, Rural Education: Community Back- grounds, New York: Rarper brothers, 195h, p. 23. 11Appendix A, Kreitlow Scale. laAppendix A, Findings and Catagorizations. 13Appendix B, Combined Questionnaire and Continuum. Nebraska ocunties, and two South Dakota counties, and in two Michigan counties were asked to recount their training on a provided questionnaire.lu By reaponding to a judgment type continuum, based on textbook philoSOphies previously mentioned, a measure of their application of their child growth princi- ples was secured.15 It then became possible to determine relationships between (1) recency of training and the princi- ples used, (2) the amount of training and the principles used, (3) the age of the teacher and the principles used, (L) the teacher's attitude toward her child growth training and the principles used in the classroom. Definition Of Terms Most of the terms used in this study are common to re- searchers. The terms are defired as a limiting factor rather than a clarification factor. Rural. Rural is a term indicating those people who live in centers of pepulation of less than two thousand five hun- dred or in the open country. hultiple-grade. The term multiple-grade relates to a situation in which more than one grade taught by one teacher occupies .ne room for the major part of their school day. Continuum. a continuum is an instrument used to obtain judgments ranging from the least to the highest degree or from the earliest to the latest application of the factor involved. L ‘ ....- — ‘ luhppendix B, Questionnaire, Part I. lSAppendix B, Part II, Judgment Type Continuum. J struncnts Used In The Collection Of Data 1‘ Th e In I The interview. In a personal interview the superintend- ents within the area served by Nebraska State Teachers College at Nayne were asked to respond to the Kreitlow Lducational Philosophy Scale. The results of this interview were analyzed, and a composite rating assigned to each county involved in the study. The rating so obtained was used as an index or measure of the supervisory factor and provided an over—all comparative basis. The Questionnaire. A linear scale type of questionnaire with responses from least to greatest degree was used. This simple type of response was usec, maiLly, for the convenience of the teachers, since checking in a given category seemed more easily done than givin= U numerical or individualized types of answers. This type of scale also simplified the classifi- cation of the results. The parameters of the questionnaire included: (1) age of the teacher, (2) recency of training, (3) years of teachinb experience, (1) amount of college train- qrowth tiaining, (6) narital status, L ind, (G) judgment of child a, pa (7) sex, (8) kind of collcse attended, and (9) titles of col- C.) ) \ lvée courses vdrhfli dealt witk1<fl;ild drowth. The continuum. Four areas of the curriculum -— reading, arithmetic, social science, and natural science -- were se- lected in order to Live an adequate cross sectional infiiéht into the cur=icular practices used by each teacher. The con- cepts gained from the information in archive records of each of the four state teacher colleges in Nebraska were so ar- I“. ranged that each of the four areas had six successively mod- ern implications.lé These were presented to each teacher in an unchronoloéical order.17 Each teacher was to arrange the items on a provided ladder in such a way as to show t’e item considered the least acceptable way to teach attached to the lowest run; of the ladder and the item considered the most acceptable attached to the highest run, of the ladder with 5 the other four responses placed in rank order up the ladder between the two extremes. Since there were four areas of the curriculum included in the study and each continuum had six categories, the mathematical permutations of re'poncss ranging 0‘ c. from a totally correct arrangement in each area to a complete reversal of responses would be 720.18 By mass tabulation a measure of how well or how poorly child growth principles were being applied in each area was obtained. By individual tabu- lation it was possible to obtain a judgment of how well one teacher was aware of child growth principles in any one or in all four areas represented on the continuum.19 Thus the studr d has both longitudinal and cross sectional aSpects. léAppendix A, (Blue, readi 5; yellow, arithmetic; pink, social science; green, natural science). 17Appendix A, (envelope). laAppendix E. lgAgpendix D. .aoz lO 3 'reatment Of The Data * Responses given to the interviews with those in super- visory capacities over rural schools affected by the study Jere totaled and made into a composite ratin5.20 Later in the study, this factor was used to weigh the administrative philos0phy as an element in the erree of teachers’ awareness of child growth principles. The responses to each item on the questionnaire sent to the rural teachers in the twelve— county area in Nebraska, the two counties in South Dakota and Michigan, respectively, were coded by color and placed on a single line tabulation beside judSment continuum numerical responses. This made it possible to see each teacher's total set of responses at a single glance and also placed them in columns so the type totals could be easil' determined. Because of the multiplicity of ,ossible responses to the judgment continuum it was felt best to limit the number of teachers from wLon responses would be obtained to 900:21 eight hundred in ch*aska, and fifty each in South Dakota and Michigan. The last one hundred responses were to be used as a comparison factor. 2OTable 6, p. A7. 21Nine hundred responses, represents the total number of teachers in the sixteen counties studied, and is 900 by chance only. ChAPTLR II EARLY AND LODERK CONCEPTS IN THE hULTI-GRADE IDEA ’Writings, prolific in both words and number of titles, have been set forth as studies in rural education. Almost all the studies deal with some separate factor, significant to be sure, but hardly exhaustive or comprehensive in the field of actual practice in multiple-grade settings. One pertinent study was made by Kate Hofford in 1930. She used courses of studies and government documents as her criteria for determining how rural schools were taught. This means that her data was not obtained from the teacher herself. Her findings hinged upon certification and the physical plant q found in Operation in rural areas.2‘ It is, however, the only study, to this researcher's knowledge, which gives an adequate status picture of multiple-grade teachinQ. We are now two wars, a depression, and a period of prOSperity away from such a study. Since this study involves the multiple-grade setting in Ikbraska's Open country schools which are both multiple-graded and rural, the terms rural and multiple-grade are used inter- changeably. 22Kate V. Wofford, "An history of the Status and Traininé of Elementary Rural Teachers of the United States, 1860-1930.' Unpublished Doctoral Thesis, golumbia University, New York, 193M, 1;. 13h. - 11 12 Aethod. That me Lod does not exist apart from the teacher is implied in Wofford's statement: Such an imperfect state if margins and deficiencies of sound educational practice could hardly be otherwise where the schools are kept from four to Six months of the year by boys and 3irls from sixteen to twenty years of age, themselves poorly educated. . . . The chief difficulties apparent in American rural schools are the deficiencies in the qualifications of the teachers and .. ,- 1.. 4.1. , 9'2 the temporary emplOmenu of them.ea The teacher determined the method. It is a common saying that teachers teach as they were taught, rather than the way they were told to teach in their teacher training classes. This statement seems to be borne out in Kennedy's study of the Los Angeles County teachers: The factor of training correlates highly with the pre- ferences expressed toward progressive methodolOgy used in the classroom as did the factor of job satisfaction as reflected in the attitude of the teacher.2H The youthful and the inexperienced seem attracted to the Nebraska rural school in situations where supervision is a very pertinent obstacle. Kennedy noted this in stating: it o . 'Unfortunately, where the least superv131on is available, the r-l most seems to he needed."29 As late as the middle 19mm; the text-book recitation method was the typical method of instruc- tior) in small schools. Rufi concluded that ninety-five per car”; of all the material covered in small Pennsylvania schools ¥ 23Kate Wofford, 22. 01 ., p. 136. 2”Stella A. Kennedy, "A Survey of School Teachers Atti— tudefi Toward Problems in Education," Unpublished Doctoral TheSIJs, The University of Southern California, Lbs Angeles, 195’4" p. 2630 251bido, I). 14.20 13 \ included in n is investigation was found between the covers of the single text used. In no instance did the teacher re- or even urge the brighter pupils to do work not assigned to the entire group.26 quire, expect, enrollment in £1 Indicative of the relationship of size of a school to progressive practice is the fact that as enroll- nnnt decreases, so does the amount of GXperimentation with new techniques of teaching.27 The issuance of sub-standard certificates in the mid- western states were still in effect in 1955 long after the 'emergencies’, for which they were devised, ceased to exist. Multiple-grades are very much in existence and the young, less-mature teacher fills the ranks in this type of classroom. Ixack of training, experience, and maturity are factors con- tuributing to the manner in which child growth asprct s are trweated in rural areas. In the light of educatlsnal comment becominr increasinalv t. , a a evixient as cites in the Nnti onal Education Journal, especially, theses is a movement to use the ungraded schoolroom procedures in lknit teaching in sucii systems as Cleveland, Ohio, and Applxston, Wisconsin. here, as elsewhere, the distinguishing Cnarfiicteristic of the success of such a plan is the good ct- F.) muhekner. If she knows and is able to apply gOOd Child \ w? t' :26John Hufi, "lie Small School ," Contribut'on to Educa- hlorl ltumber h26, Teachers College Columbia University, 1030, "Curriculum C‘naracteristics and Ifethod 27:23.? IJ. rerriss, 19"-}: rp _:Perhflcg in Ru_pal School, " National bducat iflnal Addresses, 1’4 and develOpment principles, it is logical to infer that her worth in terms of desirable child behavior would become greater if she is with the same group of children over a 99o longer period of time.“”"9 This would hold true in the case of the good rural teacher who stays in the sane school over a period of years. Revolutionary changes have not beer made, but here 2rd there, good teaching is in effect in rural settings. Rarely, however, do the results of such teaching get into print. Teaching_standard§. One of the goals among publishers of educational periodicals is the desirability of publishing new methods being tried with successful results. The dearth of m"terial of like nature done in rural settings must, then, hm; related to the nature of the multiple-grade setting in a ruiral school. If, by census definition, we View the first qural schools we are, indeed, looking at America's first scliools. Early historical records of the schools indicate thmrt many people who taught the colonial schools did so either a8 61 last resort or as indentured servants who were forced to do Srta .t challenge :uo"inct1y, how- eve r , in saying: Rural education tends toward a nati ional pattern of con- solidation. adulnixtr to s, i general, urge the cen- solidation of schools as the a w r to the national rural school problem. To res e Hrciers in education this seems too easy a solution to so lcrége a problem. . . . 0 Rural life is characterized byd ;ver sity rather than homegeneity, and the fitting of the many patterns of +wm rura§ life to one type of teaching unit seems questiona- ble. Within American culture, movement from rural to urban serti:in3s has been rapid since the advent of the phenomenon {I} F;- caliled.industrialization. nt its inception, there was an 1 inquetus for major school administrators to lessen the emphasis on Ingral education as such. As early as 1906, Kern expressed amciet‘; “or the existence of rural schools.36 The thoujt' has béet) in the expressed words of school—minded people that rural edtuoertion will soon have little place on the American scene. Whig has not been substantiated in actual practice. In the lgECT's, educators were saying that the farmer must demand a cwnzrrehensive educational prodram in his schools. It was abSC) understood that the reason why he was the last of the fiu’ewe major groups to do so might be related to "his lower p0331tiion in ability to support such a proiram."37 ’Thus in 1921, the D‘pcjtxent of Rural Education of the *“t-LQ 1181 3d u ation Association declared in its adopted plat- \ .— ‘l"~ .n d3su'flilJ JOLNL, OE. Cit., 1" SET. ' 7r \ y ‘ r" \ j,“ , . fl/ 360. J. nern, sham; teuntxji ocnools, Lew York. 19cc, :37Kreitlow, ea. c t., p. 61. form that: . . . the standard '21“ the educational preduet is tzv.‘ same country and city; the ventral aims cf public edu- cation are the same everywhere; and since the school is the educational institution sugplementing the natural education provided by h,me experiences, there is need for develrpirg inferrated rural content unite to meet the common needs. 8 t \.) At the time of the writizig of the thirtieth yearbook of St K. true National Scciety fer thr 21; of Education, rural edu- caizicnywas still a pre ssir issue. Eminent anthers of that (235' were still endeavoring to finfi solutiflns to the rural edu- CatLiCWlpPOblemS. The location of the school was at stake: [I llore 13115.11. one-half the rural sch eel: "are lccated on un- improved rouds. Thirty-seven p€2r cent cf the teachers are teaching, in schoels locate-:1 011 reads that are im- passaldxstmxrinL the 3-31nm:7 months. IIee:r 1y all.&u:11ool buildings are 03? the highway, or are reec1ed with difficultg.fl” In 331., fifty-six tr cent of the nation's children were i Claéssified as rural, and fifty-one per Cent of the nation's I O O ’ ‘Ufiacflners were teacning in one room and in two room schools.40 onetime between 1311 and the wr tin; >f the 19L,l Yea.r- h0f>k: of Rural Education, however, the attitude toward the Purgil school changed. The literature of the day was permeated Witlu .,mde11nts concerning cultural and sociolebieal common Glel.t,qts. Daw50u, in the uvc1v11n of the current status, states: \ ~38Lditorial in News and Notes of fiural Education, 1:1931: pp. l‘l‘l"22 o ( '39Nati.ona1° Societzi for tlie btudy of Education, The §;2LLi Eluhllruj._duceti3n, lnirtie h Yearbook, BloomiNgton, Illinois: u 1c school Publishing, Co., 1931, p. 60. 401mm, p. 61. l? Lie may us el‘ull.3‘ s5:c,‘1"r.~‘~=at;e the problems ff rural 51nd cit}; 1.29 uple €2.21“ the puI‘h‘fie of studyinzu then". We must not forget, however, that all Americ me are interested in the same objectives. ConFl ietL: between rlm2ul end 1.1143:er grm'ps use bounu to arise, but the solution to the issues will. he more reuxily fzund if each (Lexy considers the stake cf the others??- The cry of the e512,:cet..r, "Let's 1022'; :2 them on “2'2";- farm," :2f the earlv 1’93C's was fast C‘nn" V; am“: it. must con- tinue to 125: V236: in such 51 z-wmmr t‘ at tinge who will m contri‘rmte to buildin; e s ' V will lane in in the rural areas, {m- fitted to go to the citi’vs will This new term which inexolves éfitting; the wreatest return I a in job satisfactiwn within the ellture is termed "l“l:f"::&2“ ."42 3. _. . . ‘ e - 1 . -. fx n v- .- v. ' ‘ 2 ‘ 1 W [31.11% h fa ‘16} ti 1“ rel! it 1..; hp.) v.5 try! L“; i. O .-}/‘3‘.‘J t.le to Jr: _- , 15111121 1 educati on, from the rind of the 1906 educator, 0322223 in 1"“ L J z; I“; r//, axctive attempt not to s=c the problem as an either—or 121‘0130:_.3-‘{11012. Those wig-) study the :1Le.:.1.ien sea the cultural mange as a continuing 121‘90888, with which we must constentlv deal in order to ma :{3 effective changes in our way of line to me. t oh the occasion. It is certain in the minds of the sccic- 105181; and the educators that the rural school "<3 stems are 00 int; built in an ere 31‘ rapid sociel (21'2an5e. Kreitlm; states: The demands the peepie ”eke upon their schools have 0313:2431. The significance 7):“ rural SL ciety 152s E-llii‘tcd and. the vcr; reke-up uf tg2e rural comrmity is in the State of flux. School itertple face a real dilemma -- \- S C1105) th: u 0f 12 2 ulioward A. Dawson, "Organization and Financing of “13," Yrerbook of the Jean“ ent of Rural 1..“d22.cation of “tirmel Education Association, Washington, D. 0., Dept. P821 .11., 1:23;, 2. . 120. on .- 4‘1':1 Winnel Q2ciet” for th Study of education, OE. cit., '1‘. Duneé‘ n, 1.0 P2r12z;n 42 3011," National lfiducetien \3 Volume LS, Number 2, Februa I: 1956, p. 98. 20' whether to do what the: knau the; shovla do or do what they Know is asiect to 3?. If it :acms probatlc that guuu(t,lUHbl ruexns can te~2mxt b, pa.xfl1-n; UP) 3.0 presc 3ysixnn, th1r1‘u is :fluygld 1n2u¢h ciphcrin“ to be sure :f not being Cheatocl at the store and enou h writing to write a letter and 3M31:nae's name. This tape cf curriculum persisted well the late 1800's. Ciurpiculnr trends uf the early 1900's includc more and BW“O “" {3111 11111222" in art, 2.2112211“, and. physical 33.2.1c21tir‘1r2. By 1920, "1‘1 0 ‘I ‘ \ I‘Kh' F 103d w. Reeves, editor, adocati1n for Rural America, 125 Ch 4- ice 3‘ University of Chicago Pre:s,19h§, p. ;,. 2itlow, 22. cit., p. 119. .— 1 I .5. ----- —— _. a“ pa 5‘ I ‘ ,‘ ‘. Q- - . - v ‘3‘ ' , 1'. 3 9 ‘, 1 L \ ‘- " \ ._ .J' \ t Saki-(163 I Llral 0-4 01114.2'65 ‘N ' - 53 £741.11 ..X3 :1]; Iii‘l A)- () 1gil a} '1 MT 'ti‘A )1: o ‘( tha]. field. day: were 1:11:71"); erornc-ted and art was a regular Lriday afternoon part of the rural school curriculum. Some truly modern rural schools of this time were leading out wi community-action programs in agriculture and conservation. The chief oxyonerzt of such a p~~3“"'11;'1-.:1:: Cornell Universlt publication, "The Rural School Leaflet,"u7 Lhich to this time is considered an outstanding publication in the field of rural education. Out of such a setting grew Anna Comstock’s . . v . I book, handoook of nature Study.48 fter several revisions, it is still considered a leading book in nature appreciat on. In 1925, the chief differer ncc between rural and urban curricula was thought to be one of environment,u9 and state ‘8 “ rtncnts of public instructi1n*were placing in the hands “81.23 O of their teachers newly-organize d, subjec t-matter cente’ed, Izhztual guides, called courses of study.50 Hardly had such ccnxrses been pr Mi ted and sent to county superintendents, be— ___‘ .- ’l’ “ \ O - o 4'00. n. Fullerton, 2 One 130:1 Course 11 LlementE r" I‘Jlffilc, cefhir Falls: Fullerton and Glaj, l 29, Preface iv. Z”Cornell Rural School Leaflet, Bimonthly publication of Corruell University, Ithaca, New York. n )48Am'va B. Constock, Ha “a“ ifork: Cornell Uni eizi ‘ 1 OR of Nature Study, Ithaca, ‘7 Press, Tgth Lui‘r , 1013, 1914-7) . A 1+9 M “rtrent of brperintondcnts of National Education fSSCK31ation, Possible Narration in Curricula to IIeet Communitv #113. Individual Needs, ”hird Ye rbook prepared_ by the Depart- IfluTt‘ 13f Superintendents, Jashin1ton, D. 0.: National Educa- t1°r1.Association, 1925, p. S [‘3 o cit., I) l SONational Society for the Study of Education, o}. o 18 ”sz 22 0 c1 \ 3 C? ’Q 1 [:3 fore sharp criticism from Dunn," a’offorn,/* unutnallf and Frost,54 all active in rural teecner trcininb became cvidurt in print. The concensus :fl‘ru) more helpful end than to emrloy I few able peeple to every state to dev~lop materials especially designel to that state's rural conditions and then coordinate the efforts of those sgscialists under seme twme of national ‘ q) u; leaderwd1ip.« .Again community centered ideas permeated Dunn's concept of ruzual curricular problems. ehe states: "The center of the exhjcation of the educational effort is not the community, not a o o o 0 fl 0 (it) 5126' child, but the child fifO'leIlL; up in tne co11_-:111nit;."/’ Purpo:e s for sch<3ol attainments Lave no me can in except as they affect. the I‘JBK‘AplBS t‘r.:o‘-1_;_,1;ts and :gu’ttiens. The mmlern dechic counterpart of such a statement s evidenced in Butter— verett, Four Years in a Countr leL:e Columbia Univerrit y, 1926, \ ,, SéFannio Dunn and its-moi»; DChCNEZq the York: Teachers CO p! 9. Hrw C' 'L " 713110.") 8111!? UVHPP [1+ ‘v' j 130 o C lb 0 I \v I ISBNotional Clucetion Association, 0p. cit., p. 0'\ \J) o (‘ . .v.‘ . - 0 V o . S’National “ducation association, 02- c1t., P- I}: . .-.|l ‘11-}.- 2L1 worth's writing: "It is sound pedagOgy to base all instruc— tion on the eXperiences and the environment of the youth being instructed."60 It is of interest to note that the pregression from alphabet learning, highly teacher-disciplined rural schools to the self-disciplined self-determined goals of the modern rural school is not a different type of progression from our urban curricular pregress. The difference lies in the timing or the lag in educational practice. Dunn noted it when she said: " . Thus docs practice lag behind principle."61 Strange indeed that the voice of Kern in 1906, saying: "My educational decaIOgue for school officers and teachers inay be reproduced in one simple commandment, namely, 'Thou shalt enrich the lives and broaden the views of the country child',"62 should sound so much like the statement made by tflne foremost Speaker for rural education in the United States today, H. A. Dawson, who, in 1955' state: One of the clear objectives of rural education is to organize curriculum materials around the idea of child growth and development rather than through the offering of a group of more or less unrelated subjects.6 60Julian E. Butterworth and Howard A. Dawson, The Modern Ruréi1.School, New York: McGraw Hill Book Company, 19§2, Po ()9. p ]_ 61National Society for the Study of Education, op. cit., ' 112. 62Kern, op. cit., p. 98. 3 63Howard A. Dawson, "Organization and Financing Rural 01310013," Rural Education Today, 1955 Yearbook of Department D 1Rural Education, National Education Association, Washington, ’ (3.: National Education Association, 1955, p. 120. 25 If one asks why are curricular changes so slow to evolve in rural areas, one must consider not only the culture to which the rural school is acclimated, but one must consider the way the rural teacher training has evolved. The oldest system of formal teacher training in theUnited States is associated with the preparation of rural teachers. This the first refers to normal training in high school, which was established in New York in 183h. Gradually, this system has dwindled in use, until at the time this study was begun, there remained only one state that offered such training, namely, Nebraska. Its use, however inadequate it may have been, did give a basis for professional training and some actual, though limited, contact with an actual classroom. Ealfly'in its use normal training in rural education became a Iiiourishing field. By 1931, eighty-five per cent of all the Eitate Normal Schools had offerings in the Specific area of rural teaching . By the mid-l9h0's, there seemed to prevail in the think- ing; of those who planned college courses a trend toward elimi- natidng special rural courses since, "With the advent of con- solixiation, special rural teacher training will be unneces- SEPyH-"éh' In this period there did follow substantial gains “1 true consolidation efforts in the very states that had furnished such vigorous leadership within the field. These \ Fe ‘6hflnited States Advisory Commission on Education, The ' ‘131381 Government and Education, Washington, D. C.: Govern- ment Printing Officer-1915i p. 15. 26 leaders saw the fruition of their labor in the ever increasing services being offered to rural youth. The South turned, generally, to the county unit system which meant limited, but certainly modern thinking toward rural teaching. The Dakota's and Nebraska were left with a great number of unconsolidated schools. In 1950 Nebraska had over 6,000 independent rural districts employing nearly 6,000 teachers. Within this number were thirty-two schools each hiring a teacher to teach a single child. During the l95h movement toward reorganization, consolidation of districts showed considerable increase.65 Yet anyone who rides across the sand hills and the prairies will note at once that though other states who came under the provisions of the North West Ordinance might easily move to- ‘ward complete reorganization, the Dakota's and Nebraska have 'bwo forbidding elements -- distance and climate. These ele- nuants were then, are now, and will be for years to come the ‘vezw factors which make the rural school a common sight on thus prairies. These schools will need teachers and adequate Clunricular material, because children are there to teach and who would deny that they, like all children, have that right t30 a good education. Child growth and develOpment impacts. As an overview, child deve10pment can be viewed from three vantage points: thus Inedical or genetic emphasis, the cultural emphasis, and \ N 6SGovernor's Lay Conference on Education, Kearney, ebraska, MimeOgraphed report, 1951+- 27 the organismic or developmental emphasis. Gesell,66 Hurlock,67 and Garrison68 present child development basically as a physi- cal phenomenom, wherein the child deveIOps as he does because he is genetically so constituted. Bayley,69 Bossard,7O Martin,71 Havighurst,72 agree that the culture into which the Child is born and raised makes the child grow as he does. He becomes a developmental plant rooted in the pot of culture. Millard,73 Courtis,7h DeLong,7S Olson,76 and Shuttleworth,77 66Arnold Gesell, Studies in Child Development, New York: Harper, l9u8. 67Elizabeth Hurlock, Child Growth and Development, New York: McGraw Hill, 1956. 68Karl Garrison, Growth and Development, New York: Longmans Green, 1952. 69Nancy Bayley, "Prediction of Adult Height from Present :Skeletal Height," Journal of Pediatrics, 28:h9-6h, January- June , 1914.6 0 70James Bossard, The Sociology of Child Development, New York: Harper, l95Li. 71Everett D. Martin, Psychology and Its Use, Chicago: American Library Association, 1926. 72Robert Havighurst, Human Development and Education, Nah! Yerk: Longmans Green, I953. 73Cecil V. Millard, Child Growth and Development, Boston: Heath, 1951. ' " 7“Stuart A. Courtis, Why Children Succeed, Detroit: Flea'Ei'rns Brothers, 1925. C 7SArthur DeLong, "Understanding the Growing Child," 01143 e 2£_Education Quarterly, Volume 2, Number 1, January, 19‘5'373- Y. 76Willard Olson, Growth 2§_tne Child a§_§_Whole, New omt: McGraw Hill Co., T9113. I1 77w. A. Shuttleworth, The Adolescent Period, Evanston, 11Jnois: Monograph of Society Child DevelOpment Research, VOID-Ins II, Number 5. 28 along with their research workers, Nally,78 Kowitz,79 Udoh,80 Rusch,81 find that growth is cyclic and predictive within the cycle. They relate growth to a biological formula, which is mathematical in its precision, and known to the scientific ‘world as the Gompertz Curve or the Courtis Adaptation of the Compretz Function. The cycle is described as a growth curve which can only be disrupted by physical, mental, cultural, or emotional deprivation. The first two groups study children in groups or in sets of the m. They record what they see or get by way of mathe- matical data and then use standard mathematical methods to determine the significance of their findings. Their studies are mainly of the cross-sectional type. The latter group uses another approach known as the longi- tudinal method of study. For example: Olson takes successive measurements such as height, weight, and scores on achievement tests, converts them to a growth age, and then plots Chrono- logical age against derived growth age. This plotted line is -——._ 78Thomas Nelly, "The Relationships Between Achieved Growth in Height and the Beginning of Growth in Reading," Doctoral Thesis, Michigan State College of Agriculture and Applied beienCe, 1953. P1" 79Gerald Kowitz, "An EXploration into the Relationship of ‘ysical Growth Pattern and Classroom Behavior," In the Ele- K‘ental‘y School, Doctoral Thesis, Michigan State College of gricu lture and Applied Science, 1951;. G 8OBenson Udoh, "The Relationship of Menarche to Achieved [‘rowth in Height," Doctoral Thesis, fiichigan State College of «gricu lture and Applied Science, 1955. H 1 Blfluben RUSCh, "The Relationships Between Growth in e ght and Growth in Weight," Doctoral Thesis, Michigan State Cellege of Agriculture and Applied Science, 1951‘“ 29 helpful in judging whether or not the child is growing in an integrated fashion. Integrated growth, whether above or below the theoretical average, should give parents no cause for alarm; but irregular growth should cause immediate concern LuTtil the cause for the irregularity is found and righted.82 11x18 is but one aSpect cf the organismic approach to child study. Courtis, Millard, and DeLong along with their researchers, Nelly, Kowitz, Udoh, Rusch, use the adapted Gompretz formula Y R: (rt + i). The sign (=) means that the values are expressed in isochrons. r refers to rate of growth, t to time, and. 1. to incipiency or the beginning of that particular growth, and. k: to the maximum or achievement magnitude at the end of the particular growth. By plotting successive points on iso- dnmorric paper a growth pattern or cycle can be established, ever: Ixredicted, if three accurate measurements within the CYCle are known.83 flflnrough all the studies, no matter to which school of thouéghrt they belong, there is a general agreement that child study of child growth and development is dealing with the whole child. This is a fitting culmination to Fannie Dunn's Statement: ". . . not the community, not the child, but the child growing up in the community."8u \ __._.__ 8201son, _0_p_. Ci ., p. 182. 83Courtis, 22. cit., p. 17. 8”National Education Association, 22. cit., p. 63. 30 Within the framework of the multiple-grade classroom lies an opportunity not found in single grade settings; here effective longitudinal studies of children can be made. The Opportunity for extensive work in the area of child growth and develOpment can become the rural teachers rare and exciting adventure. All of these studies, with the exception of hofford's have as the thesis of their existence, the teacher, the school itself, or the method, with little or no thought of seeing. relationships: between method and growth principles. Wofford's study was completed in 1930. It would seem fitting to bring the study up to date with the hOpe of being able to discern pertinent findings, upon which foundation we may produce materials with which the rural teacher may expedite good teaching practices in the multiple-grade classroom. CHAPTER I I I TECHNIQUES AND INSTRUMLJNTS FOR DETLMJINING THE IMPACT OF CHILD GROWTH AND DEVELOPI‘ENI‘ ON METHOD The Sample This study is based upon data obtained directly from teachers in rural schools in Nebraska, South Dakota, and Mich igan. The Nebraska counties were selected from the ones The Dakota counties bordering: Nebraska have certification serveci by the Nebraska State Teachers College at Wayne. 501113131 laws 8 imilar to Nebraska's. Michigan, in many respects, has hiif‘er’ certification requirements, but it has somehow kept more than its share of rural, multiple-graded schools. Nebraska rural schools contain too many teachers to include all in the study. The sample is limited, therefore, to teachers in the schools within the service area of the college at Wayne. The area is well defined by agreement among the four state teachers colleges in Nebraska. In order to assure a random sampling; each of the counties wi . thin the service area was assigned a number. Each number was placed on a sphere, tumbled in a cage, and w ere drawn. twelve numbers These became the sample for the Nebraska portion of the study. The total number of teachers in the twelve- cmmtlf area, or the sample, was 9075 While the total number 31 I 32 in the whole service area was 1,827. It seems likely that the Nebraska sample would be adequate and representative. In order to give a regional significance and to provide a means of comparison to the study, two South Dakota counties, which border the area of the Nebraska sample and have similar certification and school types, and two Michigan counties, which have no city of more than forty thousand were chosen to complete the sample. The out—of-state counties with large metrOp olitan areas were withdrawn from the total, because the service area of Wayne college includes no such cities, (Apps ndix C) . The Interviews Two types of interviews were necessary to fulfill the requirements of this study. The preliminary interview was the personal-contact type, structured to determine the basic phi-108 Qphy of those who act as supervisory heads of schools in the twelve county area known as the Wayne State Teachers college Service Area. The second interview ascertaining a judgment from the superVisor concerning the manner in which child growth princi- ples Were applied in the teaching of reading, arithmetic, social science, and natural science. The latter was carried out by asking teachers to respond to the Kreitlow scale (see Awe ndix A) and is called, in the study. the SUPGPViSOEX ’ “4&5. The Questionnaire Ilypotheses concerning the study involve knowledge of much {oersonal data about the teachers. A trial questionnaire was develOped in certain education classes where teaching exper ience was a prerequisite to enrollment (see Appendix B). It was found that if only the questions that related directly to the study were placed‘in the questionnaire, the teachers who would be filling in the information would more than likely see the relationships of one response to another. This it was felt, would not be conducive to accurate answers to other questi one which would be asked of them. It seemed advisable, therefore, to include legical but quite irrelevant questions 83 a ‘means of deterring them from seeing direct relationships. 'ge’l'len the linear type parameters of" the actual question- naire were finally determined, the items included the follow- ini: (1) school location by count}r and state and assigned COde number; (2) teacher age and range (twenty-one ta over sixty); (3) marital status; (’4) sex; (5) teaching eXperiGnce and Panda (from less tian one year to more than twenty-five years )3 (6) the amount of college training; (7) type of college attended; (8) recency of training; (9) courses dealing with child growth; and (10) extent 0f f01t help, given by the ~ A 5’0 courses. Although some of the items are quite self explanatory, the rationale back of the questions selected -is important to t he Understanding of the study. ' , n Bfigarding: age. The youngest teachers would be "normal JAE."- ‘ ,"l AT . \.J 4;- trainees just out of high school, and the oldest ones would not ye t. have reached retirement age, which in Nebraska is sixty—five years. IQefgrdini; marital status. These reSponses were not inzpor’ tant to the study but were placed there to lessen the likelihood detection of relationships. liegardigg sex. These responses were not considered in the. S tudy, since it was known before the study began that ninetzx —eipjht per cent of the Nebraska rural teachers are female , liegarding teaching; experience. The exrtarience line was divided into six component parts. The first division was set at "less than one year," since some teachers would not yCit l‘jawfe had one full year 73f experience. The second diViSiOn f) w a ( I Set at "two to four years," since am,r teacher who wishes to Isievep a Nebraska certificate in force must begin the process of re”1‘16le before the eXpiration of the initial certificate.” l'he. tll ird division, "five to seven years," would include those w . hose teaching was satisfying enough to warrant two years of college in preparation for the type of certificate, termed a u f \ L . irbt grade elementary." The "eight to fourteen division" wo Illa include hose whose teaching had been satisfactory and Who , Se summers were spent worwing; toward a degree. The "four- te en to twenty-four" ivision would likely represent those te achers who liked rural teaching; well enough to make it a \ J: tyg '“Is valid for two years, but requires qualification by V 611d of two renewals or four years of eXperience. (mi... ' b.) V1 ppgfcssion and were nearly finished with a degree. The last divis ion, "more than twenty-five years," would include those teaclders holding, a permanent certificate (no longer issued) or a degree, and those teachers recently returned to the profe ssion and licensed to teach on a temporary basis with a sub— 8 tandard certificate . Regarding the amount of college traininL. Pos i‘ole U) cateurories were established to correspond to current certifi- cation requirements within the state. The first category was set t 0 read "none" which would include teachers with normal trait) ing; in high school, thus with no college training what- ever - The second division was set at less than "thirty hours" in Order to include the holders of the twelve hour certificate and. those with a first renewal. The third division was de- Siflned to include those with more than one year but less than two Years (these peeplc would not yet be qualified to teach in City school systems). The fourth category was established to indicate those who contemplated staying in a rural school even after two years of college had been completed and a cePtificate awarded which would allow them to teach in a town 01‘ (2:11;:y system. The final category was designed to include th . . Use who hold degrees but are "rural minded" snort-n to remain i ., . n xx) 1‘81 schools. figgarding kind 9;; college attendev . The question con- ct, . prnind the Mine 0f college attended was listed merely to b Peak the continuity of the two previous items with the one fo llowing. They have no bearing; on the study. \)) 0‘ 9-1- iiSAE—ir‘dll‘i; the receng; of tra nim'. Categories provided were geared to certification and amount of college training incurred. Renewal of the teaching certificate always involves professional education cre ~it. 'i‘he attainment of a degree does not require education credit but may include credit in advanced courses toward the preparation for some other pro- fession. Regardin; course titles. The catalogs of the Nebraska Sta (1" e Teacher Colleg s were used to ascertain the course title-s involved in certification rexgluirements at five year intervals from 1920 to 19557. It was; felt that not all teachers ‘aOUli‘t have had their training; in Nebraska schools. Conse- Q‘ief'tly, at the right side of the line space was left where the COIirse title which described their situation could be entere (3 . Regarding extent of helg. If the study were to reveal ”1 é‘tti‘t'ude toward training in rural education, then sore measure relating to their reactions to this training prograxr. W" ° 31—‘10 be necessary. Placed as it was, near the end of the C' ‘5‘ . . o _ o o UleStl<2orInalre it; was felt that the teacher might be willing +‘ r‘ -. ”0 PG: “Ct frankly to the kind of training she ‘r‘ad undergomg. r . . 3 n ‘ H Bile finished questionnaire is to be lound in Appendix 1:. The Continuum 43169 rationale connected with the continuum type measuring ins 1 trLu-‘lezit is rather new. The first educationally oriented COD . a . r er, 1 tinua were used in tne late lA-VlO's, when educators PGdliotO I J tint .ir1 educational questions, there are degrees of agreemert insteéi C. of definite "ares" and "no" answers to questions.8 \fl Upon examining the response to a corn‘1inum, type of’ 1'1€-;=as;ure, one {maBZf' obtain a measure cu imalhef concernirg the tepic at £365 hand . IEcjinzators would not deny the values of growth studies; get t;e2:(1:books in child growth, more eSpecially the early ones, are gsreeeciicated upon empirical as well as upon research find- ings- gas the principles are drawn out of books, back through V tflm :{€3£11°s, it is more and more rwrident that much which is stateci JTor truth is the result of armchair philOSOphy. .This is thuB EJay of all science, however. There was alchemy before chemis try; there was astrology before astronomy. In setting fmfifll ‘ttie grob*ession on a child growth continuum the same levele (If thinkinf are present. Unless the person who uses 5*Cor‘tlirruum measure sees this progression and places his con- CePtS 1:1 probressive steps from earlier 4to later implementa- tions (51‘ these concepts, as related to child growth and de- ve1013“63r1t;, the continuum loses its significance. For example: C ‘ . 'I 1 o Q onsld£§r* the approach to tne psychology of learning. T (1 £3 6. ‘a n V ntire Elchool idea is predicated upon training, training toe 'm', n a . ’ d‘Arni knowledge. For over a thousand years Plato's metnod of 0 1 7 1 leal‘rllng influenced the pedagogues. he stated: " there i. Q ______~‘~‘» no need for analysis or generalization of eXperi- E3 . . - York. Iqatnanial Cantor, Dvnamics 2£.££222195) Buffalo, New ‘° t"oster and btewart Publishing Cyrporation, lghé. ,0 4 Ibid. t." -' ' .11. enees" ’( an: "auctions have little to do with 8.ng111 ic ant learn 11193-1368 These statements more or leg s unfi'd‘girded the 11};il(::‘,0pbjf of the school curriculum until the early 1930': His teachings and the teachings. of mi tot 16 were rem“. ever;7 day e}: erience; they were concerned with the search for unive rsal ideals. Comenius, in the early 1600's, led a re- AV volt a igainst t‘n’a Platonic tradition. lie relied upon the ssngres as the sozrce of imp salons: from which knowledge could Le constructed. He did actual ”Rose-ervatisn of children and developed the first picture text for children, thus he- ginr;ing the trend for realism in education. Jo‘r'n Locke's View of growth and SevelOpment could be sta t e (‘3. : at b irtl‘. the mind is mach like a 'tam: la rose! -- 5"» 319 an slate; e :rience is the stylus that develops the 'facul-z-ies' of _}l.i:: m'hd. Educators Who tank the teachings of J: I“... Locke,- literallv believed that ~pod teaching; could overcome almost any handicap. ROusseau's belief was that man cmnes good from the land Q. IN "~ - 1 o o _ - ”1 Jud and is made as only bu: 1:.)1‘tact with s1'1ci1-',t ’ around }li" l O ?T ‘. 1 36 .‘r‘ '. v~ «v1 ‘ .' (1 3 ‘ x‘ n 3 . 1 ’1 V f", n)"; T}‘ t 1\ "4 . The; 1.221143% or? CO:1181‘1T-.1:t= l a L‘JC L:;:) , 8 r: C4 ’ d e 1.1. {I H a {‘3 N. H. H (:1 < A "I f-Jo 3 (D "J ‘J “t d "L :3 C (:1 (.1. .2 CT r .1 5.: ’0 O (1” 1" r11 1‘. 17-," . 1 -, called standardised testin“ Unsure educators NH? neece b '39 . _ x _ p w k« E1 mathematically correct answer to tnqu critic, tno W”, ‘.. '5 .- o w w a ' £ 1) ~‘ ~ , 8 $11.: I‘lgtflb’rl‘fg 1,38 11' O'w'f‘u IHOI‘ale . M‘dSS education was 11‘)er ‘. - . . l I .DJ.)Q".[1I and With Tilt-ASS eqlucatiz‘m came “.8155 t88t5-ll,_;, (114E135 tab a s Q 0 u1£1tiion Of results, and even mass tGhCfilN; geared tc the {-1. x, '3: 11 ‘1‘ ‘ . . ‘ . , ‘ q- q _ _ 1 . f - a‘ae’, unich, in reality doesn't ex1st. so dUhNUi” 0604M ,. d E"; “0* ‘u 3 1 ” =>n the class prafile sheet are a 59d udwifiture 9f 881’)? (a . ‘“ <3r1d nonsense in the educational realm. less effective, the scientific study of children swept trv in far fewer Years and 1W1;U9n09u mere educators o _ 0,.0 new selentlflo GT 0_ 1 - ,1) _n s .1 1 , :1. o LI-“ Jgoint ). 1 €' .t .L()Uail' 1w J1 (a .Ll.’ “11.2,: J f“or: \ ,‘_‘ fl" .A‘Nf L _. r‘ ‘1 0 ‘2r ‘ 0 COM vale-nod 12‘1" 411,-; 3.“ t ,-. Io --- 1 t cult iJ lint that o .L- fie ngrinciples which have guided child ¢roxtn 6nd development that time. It should be made clear, that as a m esurfn; (:1 (I) k l for this 5111;, this researcher is interested in us i n.1,, the proLre s s ion pr inc i 1%:1?£is=ka, a ccnse votive section of the United States -- o 1 .‘ LT- . - ' o .‘ y. S.‘ ‘ ~ ('1‘ ‘ v -‘ «n ‘ Imaa-g:17 than “£1“; con; on"1tiJe Cuddd mz_t ..€%s sac“ am“ osweéiq 0" New 'HICDIWc, or :kuo 516*“), CalJJJTPni&. ‘I?ie four state teeche s colleges in the state of Nebraska ‘ . - .. ‘ ‘ . l‘ . r P ,, - - ‘1. - ,__ ‘T’. ‘ - ' o r . .4 are (Zu)lrtfulltfllljw a CL)HHIQ Learn]. 1L s ii,1wr1ld be aflerctCC that ;iiejr'cn1rsco, bv title at least, mould be Verf SiuilaIu In dartezrminihg the child growth and development sequence for the cxntxtinuun the author consulted the catalobs of each of the c43]_1e5es to determine (1) the coincidence of the offerings ‘1“3 (E?) the number of hours of college credit offered in each 0f the: courses. These findings are shown on t1 6 continuum in r G Table I: on the follovinr page. k.) VJi.th the course titles in hand the needed step for pro- 0 .L‘ ' v- o 0 r- «PinCJ 'book titles was attained. age ain records were sought. FPO» - I” tQFua grade records which each instructor was required to t . urn 31f} at the end of each marking period, the names of the to -2 ‘th Ilsxe d weie taken. These titles with the names of the cour 8‘353 in which they were used are shown in Ta bl 8 II on p 8. i“ e L 2443 . Since the texts were chosen for five years of use and . . Sszmce th, study involves teachers who could have had their TABLE I *1 ," ‘ " ‘f‘a V ' f‘ "v - ":O V" "9 f‘jfi I .v ‘ IACGRQSSIJN or CUJRSL TITth Ur rib H“ 1 «Lu! NEBHAS KA L5 TILT LACthS COLLEGJS FROh 1930 to 1955 Colleges Years Credit' Course Titles Where {W Hours Taught* ‘ 1955; 2 Introduction to Education l,2,3,h 3 Human DevelODment and Behavior I l,2,3,h 3 Human DeveIOpment and Behavior II l,2,3,L 2 Elementary School Curriculum 1,2,h 2 Foundations of Education 3 ‘ 195(3 2 Introduction to Education l,2,3,§ 3 Educational Psychology 1,2,3,’ 2 Per3)nality DeveIOpment 1,3 2 Philos0phy of Education 1,2 2 Guidance in the Elementary School 2,h 2 Principles of Elementary Education 3,h BELLS 2 Introduction to Education 1,2,3,Ii 3 Educational Psychology l,2,3,h 2 Personality DeveIOpment and Adjustment 1,3 2 PhiIOSOphy of Education 1,3,h \ 3 191:0 2 Introduction to Education 1,2,3,b, : 3 Theory of Education 1 i 3 Educational Psychology 1,2, g 2 Philos0phy of Education 1,2,3 1 i—\ M __. _. _. -2. M i L 1935 3 Introduction to Teaching l,2,3,li 2 Child Study 2,h 3 Theory of Education I 1,3 i g Theorylof Education II % 2 a a P5 cho o ' . ___--~A y 63 :A9 9. 1930 5 General PsycholOgy 1,2,3,}4 1 h Pedagogy u 5 Theory of Education 1 KJL-._______3 Classroom Management 2,3 ) TthS continuum should be read from the bottom to the top. \ t} '“One indicates Wayne State; two indicates Kearney State; n?e€3 indicates Chadron State; four indicates Peru State. +4 0 93 H 1955 h2 TABLE II PRO‘SRLSSICN OF TD T TITLES OF THE IJISBRASKA STATE TEACHERS COLLEGES FhOL 1930 to l?§§ IIntro. to Ed.p - Lee, An Intro. to Ed. in Modern America Lilo. Sch. Curriculum - No text Iiural Ed. - Dunn, The Child in His Rural Environment #_ E A __J .-_ —.fl-.‘ -0..-er 19u5. ZIntro. to Ed. - Reader, A First Course in Ed u.cation 13d. Psych. - Gates a GersiId 1, Ed ication—I PsychoIoLy I’ersonality Dev. - Ian er, Psy_holom x Human Living I?hilos OphT of Ed. - Kilpatrick, IhilosOpl" of Education IPrin. of Ele. 2d. - Rugs a Shoemaker, The Child Centered School Ifural Ed. - Wofford, Teachinr in_a Small School M TJEntro. to Ed. - Reeder, A Iirst Course in Education 15d. Psych. - Thorndike and Sates, Educational Psychology I?ersonality Dev. and Adj. - Ryan, Mental Héfilth thru Ed. libiloSOphy of Ed. - Kilpatrick, Foundation of Methods ffural E . - Slacks, The Rural Teachers Work L .- : —! 1 #1.... i? _- A..- a! "w...“ oft. “*‘me —__ -. .. ~m'. ”’0‘ \1-0. w lento Intro. to Ed. - Reader, _A_ First Course _i_._n Education Unneory of Ed. - Thorndike a Gates, Ale. Prin. of Ed. I’sychology - Gruenberg, Readings in_—Eild Study IPliiIOSOphy of Ed. - Kilpatrick, Foundation of Methods IRJJral Ed. - Ritter a Wilmarth, Rural Teaching fi } i f 1935 n 1930 ('4‘) 0.3!. w""‘4 wmo~¢..-.. .. .uu .. ' .. ,. This IEITtro. to Teaching - Butterweek a Seegers, An Orien- tation Course in Education TDTjeory of Teaching I - Thorndike & Gates, Ele. Prin. of Education Ifiaeory of Teaching II - Second one-half of book }?<‘ycliolo y - Norsworthy a Whitley, General Psychology 4— .‘. ‘L- ‘n‘ “A... ‘A— Iiiirai Ed. - Ritter &Wilmarth, Rural Teaching L—____~££E:Feral Psych. - Pillsbury &.Angell, General Psychology eory of EQAMZ‘gates, Psycholo:y for Students of Ed. v—V— 'WI- *9.“ (=<>r)tinuum should be read from the bottom to the tep. 1nit1£11_ training twenty-five years ago, the first rung Of the ta 0 1 Xttu3(>L{ continuum must of necessity list tnose texts used in 1930. :Irl general these texts set forth statements describing CuwumJW_ vs ‘ 1&3 ways Of dealing With children. While It may have been true that; 5. one of the statlments set down as guiding principles could not have been substantiated in the light of research, the teacher-in-training was urged to use these principles in actual teaching. The books were carefull;r read by this author; the princi- ple was recorded, categorized, and from the final grouping of like principles, reworded to incorporate a basic idea. Fro-l these statements, called principles in the study, the steps on the child growth and develop-gent continuum were established. These; are shown in Table III. After determining, the guiding, principles of child growth, and having set them forth on the continuum (Tahle III), the next task was one of choosing a principle which correlated Close 1y with one in each of the four subject matter areas used in the study. The texts used in teacher-training classes for thze years beginning with 1930 were ascertained from the archive records, and a point of method was established in the teXtS to fit each of the rungs of the continuum (Table III)- These I301nts were arranged to coincide with the child growth and d9 VeIOpment concept of the period in question, and are illustrative of concepts set forth in Table III."" \ the tin-File)? are not to be considered a complete appraisal of On caotal subject matter area. These concepts were arranged teacluréis; after consultation with a member of the staff who Was 816:3 in the area in question, a progression of concepts explagl‘eed upon, which met the textbook concepts, the teacher statenat ion, and the child growth principles in effect at the read five year intervals. These continua for the .fields of 1‘18, arithmetic, social science, and natural science fol- l-\ 3w in Tables IV, V, VI, and VII on pages LLS, I469 “'7’ and )48. _“ w.- -_-__._A A-.— 4 —_A... _- Year 1955 1950 r3 3 , U I u‘ 4 r-s H r4 GENERAL GROWTH PRINCIPLES The child's browth is innate. His growth is cyclic. Only severe deprivation can alter the direction of growth. The teacher is a g‘i.:‘:-.e who knows from the child's record when to teach and when to let the child Li :7‘ 801’“ learninés . The child resgunds to teaching, as a whole. mus the teacher arranges his learning situations so that the Child may find he is responding to teaching; with all 1113 faculties -- “is head, his actions, and his feelings. W'V‘IMIJHMDMJL M - A..4 191:5 1'? MC- . 1935' 1930 This 'I‘I'le child is an individual with whom the teacher must deal as an indiv idual. His behavior is partly innate but his environment determines directional growth. The child is a type pcrsorality 1.542988“ behavigc' i: d.etern~ined by tIe Imihtht of external forces on his life . MIA A _.A I'he child is considered a younb adult to be taught bv eXperimcntal learnings and activit ies which will 88‘» sist him to live in his ;:;enerstion adequately. The child is a young adult to I); drilled and taught % live in the world of the present generation. 1 continuum should be read from the bottom to the tOp. who-tact“! .I.‘ l 4T _~.-‘ . . .1 —_ CL 1" 3111 IV .‘iLI‘xDING CO IITINL "~51“; Make a vailablo to the child wl'm 3s ouestionin; a wide range L of materials-t. "ith ';’11id,.f1nce from his teaclmr he could select U those; reading. materials which he could as to answer his ques t :1. one . .__._. A. V v. Read: no can best be attained by assisting)r the child to find. for himself satis factory solutions to his bro-b ler s and Ques— tions through the printed page under a teacher's guidance. I vvv— The ch 11d is helped ty an understanding, teacher by providing instruments of learning. so that he can comfort i‘nly master u Questions asked by both pupils and teacher. 3954531135 can best be accomplished by first seeing; to it that the child is o 1H1 ohm 10101 ically and 1:sycholo;ical 1y re ad; and the n presenting; a systematic series of Jraded material. -;- A .._.A 4A ”A d __. ‘— rvv—w _ v w '7‘ fit- "W'wv:- - the teacher should present to a homegenous group of children a Systematic sequence of close grad-0d material. '— ‘v v-‘V_-— —.— v vv—u— w— y 7—— R‘B‘idina is response to symbols. ‘5 is best attained by Present in;’_; a lim ted repertoire of words. Repeat the P499" sentation until the response becomes automatic. 5:; adding words. regularly the c} 11‘) gains reading ability. wh- =4- fi— a This Contimum should be read from the bottom to the tOp. 1‘31 {ITHJL TIC C Use of manipulative devices by the children to enable them to dis CCVC r mathematical (01. CLpts and generalizations . The teacher is a guide. ‘ v T— ‘ V‘- v.“ _ _ “3%‘wamvm‘l V - The teacher prepares and uses games and devices L) wrv ' wvv-w tzi enliven the necessary repetition essential to mastery of arithmetic proce S gas . .4 _- ___ w— WV .7 a-— ——.'V. —m-i—~ Wu.- ..” ca; we r... tr The teacher states the rule, then she demonstrates why the rule is true. 3;; drill, the children establish the rule in the ir m finds . w". .— __‘.—-—. A ‘_.—‘_ u._ _. ..=_.~‘-_m, ”4 The teacher assigns a definitive process with adequate drill exercises. Ste checks the papers and reassigns extra drill to those who do not master t‘. 16 work. fl - ”mummvr: 1&an- vaMWWm'WWWWQ’MW'JHJQMW f The teacher states the rule, the children memorize the rule and (1’) exercises to fix the process in their minds. _ __L— ‘— - “fig-:M‘. ,mfifmw‘fl l . “15 t6: 0} rr assigns from :1 text. I'Te pupils read the exPlanation and t“.e_n do to‘ ‘ 1roblems _ ...--_____. -wuhln.‘f‘? . ~— ' .7. "‘fi " —v .r wv :“.- ra‘flta—IL‘ , 1 Thj-S Cuntinuw q should. be read rem the bottom ‘60 1300 tOp. v TABLE V I 5 OC IAL S C ILLNCE C QIITIIJUUIVI A ‘. ‘ ' 1 ° 0 ‘ o 1 a! I' The 3, (.20 1511 science:: are mace ““38 hing-3111, ti): SI‘NJpL‘LnQ‘ wuat i I: a V \\ - w ‘ _ . ‘ _ ‘ ‘ i. the c} J ilu investigates arounu try: 110.188 , the m: idioorhood, ¥ 3 a z 1 ’ " , ,. O ‘ . ‘ ‘ ‘ .~ — . _. ‘—\ r -. . \.’ ‘ ’ the c Cnnmhnlty, ms. b'mttt}, Lu nation, and flmlly the world .-: 5- | .- W '— ~ - ‘Zuuhul‘rS-an-‘mna.’u.---.'.‘. .-1vv..~s¢o—_¢m.v——u~nu -¢~-'—.~~-¢ -‘--rh\ 'f'"‘-‘-v-‘“"\*n~""‘" 9",“‘fi1 ‘. 500 i 13. 1 S (‘- ien CF: 8 8X 13 t on If; 41:;- .':;. t“. it} to $1‘Ez‘50 (‘1 Q1. cup of k not/1— ; : >2 112-859 s and :3 kill '3 1:7. 26:1 .114: (:1: 11d at: [7:1 ins through par 41:01- g ‘. \ I . 9 V ‘ 3. ('1 ‘ \ . ' O" - V ‘| . "— ,- \' ' . r '3 E patLVDII .11’} fs’JL‘Ju 0.5.. as 4:! :1 Lu", l-ul .. - - Ll ‘U. % 7‘. u. w —‘. fi%~.~“.",'--F~w.~ -_\_ -. a . 2.1,. -~.. ~. ' .- 3.”- . _ M... .__. ~ . '- .. \- . \-r-\-., .. «ta-“4‘ : ’ "1m :, ;‘~ .3. 5.81 scie norms are. ra—mnirbful 2,113.}; 1:19:13 ‘;6 Cpx'e‘qfi'ficul l ", : f . {concepts are .-t;1dir=d first. Then “Historical events are i Z 3 : «f 3 1 o 0 .. - ‘ 1 1 stud 3.8 G: . Lac-t]; p:wcx’nzwm: is studied 31191": a m..- 3 1 crbzgnlzuq ' ‘v i 2 1 .Luv J» l ' I J J-. ' . 3 _--:\‘~.—~.-‘~MJ.—V‘ n-\--I--v'c --~. QC- " - u... vow-0A --~u_‘. "‘ ‘AJV‘W"-P'- -w""" -"" '5’" " '1’ .f.--” . ‘ . A a. 1‘ '\ 4- a" ‘4‘ . ' IV .' a . . ~ ,‘w I \ nuance.» £1;OUJ.- 3f: “Allynlt J.:- :L'WCiJ.lC :‘tv'flQhC‘P ‘ .' C 1* € . 1 '9 ‘ ‘ 'v"-“‘ ‘ J 7" “ I! .‘ ‘. ‘rn ', ‘. . r). J‘ '2 1‘ ‘ ‘ 111a. .f‘_-..z.*.~tt Lm.<-:r':-,L.;.w.o 8;...»16. civillawdawx : L , h ' . ‘ -\3 vv‘ 1‘ 4- n v.-‘:v-~ 1‘0 n- ' 11.0.3. JE‘F‘J’ 1 CC. fit: '4 J‘ ..‘- (Q lo‘)(' ' ;‘{;1;‘.‘_~ .)HJ_\3J_I'J‘ : ‘ T W “ 9 'v 0 Q o A o ‘ WWW". ~1I~n~v~ov~~own-"v-u-v-lw-hp. 1°.‘~l°.‘--"_Ol-.u‘ -‘.' -,..‘. "nun-par- ~_.r--'nso--wo- ~.'-.-. ”4'” 1 . ~ , w ‘ 1.. .MJ A. m. 9,- ' .Lt use: (1:10.411; be (“A 1427'). 11:13-» Clfisu,.\ T 3 , ‘ ‘ 1 _O I ’ '_ ‘ .. ‘ ~ . g ‘5 ,9 ..‘ 1 r. ._ .. nag-UV, an ' (tn/10:; . Tenn}: ‘1.- -L- -g {(11 3.310.] n ‘ ’ u r'r~* 1'»: \r'310 -\ c A- n - '--—~ O.~"-‘~w.\\ W‘vnvcan *s—‘,~D ,u‘ “.‘-V‘M~‘1Mythfiu\-.‘r ~m~\~ ‘d‘- *0“.-"—i~ 0...,5‘ Q” q “ I ' " " . I- ‘ ~' -1‘ ‘1 - ' ‘5' ‘ ‘ 0!“\ THEN: mmmr’lzatirm OI a,3,c.,;- ‘ (3n (.‘_‘r|(.',‘71'tf{ L. )1 mg—a-opnm-a-Mn-w LW-..~v~.,~u Nurvm-v ~s "0-"“--l'~.--&fl--"'/l-WO~~0~-~Ju--mo»q I‘ ’ .‘g .N -. . -L . r-v -‘ 11D. '3' a.) (1 (le 3.48:] o l is C‘Jhtinuum "1:031; he rm"). {‘rx'nn too 1‘).~t"r.»rw "m the ‘* _- . - -‘k‘ 0 TABLE VII - ‘ lr“ '1—\ I. -“,q.‘1 I‘“-“va-\f7_ r 1%“ .L LuU‘. L 3C1” lib—1 DU.“ .L .LLWLTTJI‘. - .-o-'V--Fv> O ‘\ N I- 1 1 . (11‘... e H ( ';.n:......:~ am . ‘- 4— -A~_..4 A -u-w- “‘3.“ ‘.; A.”Ak;-*-"‘\‘r-h¢ um. .;£¢-*cv-"~""'..W“‘- ‘n',.-.’.(-ur..- \o- 2 ~h). ‘ aru‘ .-'.)-n'.‘ I..- '1‘ "" Il‘V’ r ‘ u 4- p-‘ - J! ‘ I I rrr. - - I. - , y « . ,| ; . ‘_ ‘ 'I . 1‘ u . (a ,I ,‘ a . * ‘\ . . . i:!.,., '_:__‘| -'_. ()l (_l"' “VP“ ‘1‘;‘.‘ -(I'J (,-l’: r \(_!‘\‘( :{.:$ 1.: ‘_'lr1-_'J. :\‘.“ . _*-A I, .'o-d-—-'"*U1r~A-' N- ‘ ; J ‘l .1 § 'fl ,. to , v ‘- u . l O A ’ J .77 r '~ —~‘ _: H V \ I I” 9. r;- c f" f'.’ x s.“ '\ ».IJ I I I J :1 ' I. C); ‘ ‘ m—br.”nrkd‘f§{awp~x‘~‘um“ .1 1‘. .fl. ; ‘I'fil - K," h ,.‘Q (J .L.’,~ ‘1‘ ’ ' , . .p . .’ u f' ' W L , J- $ ' A ‘ ~ V 7.. Ix . " ' t f‘EJI *1. 1{.r‘l'. Ll.) l l.; x Li‘- {I Lil“ i‘o‘ I“) / r, J. ‘1 (';._)t 1..-y r "$' ‘ 'lr‘r‘ (3.101 F ‘. ! E‘sSLiE‘ . .lv- ~— v “‘7 'nuwwuhmucfinsmmmv --v“_..““‘v w v w —-v ‘U'V-m l 1.. ‘ —\ . A ‘-. . - .‘ ‘ . .‘ ‘ ,aI ' » ‘ —. 7 3A ' "- I ‘ O ' ’ n ;J.iezlgxe tfiOdlchefi must Le -un; u tal leerLIth, there or; ', I « A’. u‘ . ‘._ . . A . , ‘ \ s '\ . ~ ~ " 0’ ‘ ‘ “ “ '. ‘ i “mi-'21:; C3 1:; l‘r'm.:'}:t into other tut-’Jec't 13:1}.th areas. 9:22). 1:: ‘ u k. I E gtlm :4 sseparate course. i Q .— —# ~‘quu-1 ; t'. ’<&(.' ”-r lA‘C‘S U5’4‘;67‘;V iJLJL» d.Cl--‘ \2 J l/ L‘ L ’..'.-";:| 1': ‘- (5‘ , MJQ-f i 1 é I i (3} I 1 {-fi 7 . . 1 . \" - i \ ' ‘1" 0 V w‘v" 1 53 '. A k 1 ‘**-..'JL I” earnluo to recnpn ze awlu l“ L “’“”1‘ '“ i . " ‘ +- 3 g m dupe; . ‘ I u -fi‘-..‘ -1“- Mva‘§--Q-omw.—zm~ ‘ w— A“ wyfiwr 4 pm fl - I I 1 .. , . 9" 1 v5 -‘ .‘x ‘ . "‘ 1‘ ‘ g i L. t. E. C Lune -- Glut; :c, 0011:; 18 t..‘-; i); \" )0th 11.114. 3" ‘5' UPI.) mil 1'11: tut} r- i 3 i f s I I . ‘ L‘ ~ A “ . \-~ ~ m \ I ‘ 1V ‘- K ICh‘lo-I’SII "LAT-t IV" 1"T”I/ 6’ \~J.L‘CH u}. t: lH‘iifTILt.Q-' . 1-.”.3r“ ‘5 4‘“: ‘3"‘3 V I: , 3 f :ke I) . ‘ ‘ O ‘ u _ « t -L ' :~af urlny n a nu aboot. P V-‘v ‘ ‘ v- M a A“ A n. “A _. A‘ ._._ A ' ‘3 A r “‘. \. as :: .z‘I‘_‘.£a(.1,J Q Lanny“, ’uuWI‘gc.-r-K.; -»-«;v. -——§.A ya‘m~p~4«o.w -.“‘o4"d‘\°4.~5'-"".'~“‘""-'~o’.‘-‘.&"“1I ‘c5m-‘ n,- I 't‘... K; ‘3 {1+ iilllLL'” " I ‘ _ f . A .- w on,— - .1, ‘-.. our. 4. I . «mnlfl he rnac.4-rmI My: bongo“ Uo bhe Lop. u__._ A..__ *_ ”M- A‘mM-~wfi-‘.. - :,r._. II¢~. ’... -’,~.$ .- \- .. “I . 3 .3 \_..L' 4.11: .'...1...L.I‘.1_ .L-M-tl‘ld-sut, (.letzd -.1 JL-.-.L'J'!z-'Yit , I1-J.‘-1'IIJ.LL’ was printed, black on wzite, with the Six ressponrqee in (2:07": 00 ,, «m - - r.— 3:" r_ our colors. ’ .2450}? col .-r denote-:1 an area, blue («.not w} r\ reading yellow, ari thmetic; pi 111i, r—ocial scion-w; an’l green, {to natu ral science. After these responses: were 13Pll".ifd each Set 33515 separated so that each res ~m-se was made on a sew;- rate slip. 'flqese slips were mixed, placed lmse inside the " bla n!’ ccntinmim ladder form, and m:- ile to the teacLers . TEL-e teachers, in turn, I"’+-‘:~Z’3 the dire-:ti’ns, and arranger} t‘re (um-we‘d reegmecas in the ir order of sitni ificamze as. each Twezc-nse took its. rele‘cive place on tflB continuur: according to agree ent witn their a.»plicati on of child growth princi- 1‘-les . ‘I‘L’N' gruocmf. 1PB required lilf-fsihg the 105151" acceptable 1"‘J-“I‘Qnsse at the bottom of the ladder an? L110- most acceptable 139313 ’3?“- I: e at the tOp with the other regronses in their re.- SP‘BC'C 1V6: 'ank orr‘er 1,:e-tween the two extremes. Wh 116 it is. true Lott tie tea Cher nav n )1 have 1:1“;- .ticei; I 1 .Y' "t" o 1‘1 ““3 manner in Wthh she answered tne continuum, it 38 (D 0, me .- 4° 0. Cf r.) Ll ““5 T‘lr‘na eff‘eotive may to Get»: r111 he 814'Ii-li-3‘rtti-m “7’11 Chil Q’ - . ,0 O __ _. 221.0»! Lb 11111110 il)1es 8:15:73 used W 431107)?) EiCtliEll—J VlSltinfi Lille Clrl'SS 1.051". Brine E‘L‘ndr‘d Classroom} ViSItaf-ions 'ATl?re (ll/lite 1'.)er‘07‘5 '? . * the {cape of this studF' \ «0-0 in A A complete printed questionnaire and continuum appear V”. P" hdix B. CHAP ‘l‘ifiR IV RESULTS OF THE STUDY Organization Of Data VJith the assistance of county superintendents in urging their teachers to return the questionnaire and the continua when completed, 767 of the 900 sent were returned. This represented, approximately, an eighty-five per cent return. iflae raw data tabulations were made by code number on large twenty-two inch by thirty-six inch sheets of paper in Web a way that a total picture of one teacher's responses could be seen by following a single column across the page. Fro"! this ungrouped data a composite of the material with its We ighted values was made. The composite of this data, recorded by counties appears in Appendix D. Since this study postulated on page ten that relation- Ships existed between (1) ability to teach and age; (2) ability to teach and the amount of college training; (3) ability to 1393011 and recency of training; and (L1) ability to teach and ”tent of help which they felt their courses had given them, the riJrst statistical arrangement concerns these relationships. "“ffordvs study indicated that the relationships of good educational practices in vogue in 1930 had little impact upon rural areas. Her expressed feeling was that 1930 was the year 50 51 of beginning and that rural education would move progressively forward at a faster rate than had been evidenced in her study. This statement is on trial in this study. Presentation Of Results The histograms of how well the subject matter areas are being taught in accord with child growth principles can stand alone in their interpretation which in general states that reading is most commonly taught by a method prescribed 20 years ago. This can be seen by the high scores occuring at the 50).; to L156 level, while it is also evident that at the 720 we ighted score which would indicate good use of child growth principles, there are very few who use such principles. The rest of the statistics, however, bear no meaningful re- lationships to the ability to teach unless the responses made or) the teaching continuum are placed beside the re- Spon-‘Bes to the questionnaire which concerned the personal data . The weighted score was ascertained for this purpose. This data from which Figure 5 was built appears in Appendix E' If the response was in accord with modern educational practice as set forth in textbooks used in 1950 through 1955, then the response would be 1, 2, 3, 11, S, and 6. That ar- I'amgeh’lent would represent good basic phiIOSOphy and an aware- ness of the progression of methods in the area in which she rates as l,‘2, 3, L1, 5, and 6 in correct order. Should this teacher know the most acceptable, but not be aware of past methods, the weighted score should still be high but not 52 rated as perfect. In order to equate the weighted scores, a place value was set upon any response out of order. The possible permutations of responses from the totally correct order 1, 2, 3, 11, S, 6 to a complete reversal of responses 6, 5, )4, 3, 2, 1 number 720. This tally was made from the original continuum responses and appears in the appendix as Appendix E. From this tally one can obtain a measure of how effectively the child growth concepts might permeate the effective teaching in each of the four areas on the continuum. This is shown graphically in the histograms labeled Figures 1, 2 , 3, and 11, respectively. Figure 5 shows a composite pictlare of the totals in the four areas. An adequate inter— Pretation of these histOgrams is found on the page with the figure. 1 Problem 1: Measure of use of child deveIOpment principles The relationships existing between effective use of child growth and development principles as evidenced in effective teach ing in the four areas are shown in the line graph in Figure 6,_ pages 58 and 59. Each subject matter area is de- 3181131: ed by a specific, keyed set of marks. The range from good t 0 poor along the horizontal axis and the frequencies from few to many along the vertical axis can be read from the graph and a comparative picture can be discovered at a . C, ‘1!!! I II ‘ I 0 \l. Il‘a."l~.dl\.e Frequency 53 Figure l. . A Histogram Showing the Weighted Score in Ability to Choose and Place Correct Responses on the Reading Contunuum. Ns7ue Cases. Scores The weighted score is indicative of the teachers‘ foundation in teaching in this subject matter area. It is a more inclusive measure than the ability to choose and place the correct acceptable practice in the first place on the continuum; i.e. placing responses one through six in 1, 3, 2, 5, h, 6 order would be a better choice than 1, e, 5, u, 3, 2. Frequency 51; a Figure 2. A Histogram.Showing the Weighted Score in Ability to Choose and Place Correct Responses on the Arithmetic Continuum. N- °7u8 Cases. _ F 6" vegafiemfin «Aging: «amass.» uncthamu ugh) V " ~ {'9‘ \D own» 0 0-2: —- “‘ ;{ngQ 943833‘ <30MF§hUE§§msqtvdgofgfi=ompg§ t0 Scores The weighted score is indicative of the teachers' foundation in teaching in this subject matter area. It is a more inclusive measure than the ability to choose and place the correct acceptable practice in the first place on the continuum; i.e. placing responses one through six in l, 3, 2, S, h, 6 order would be a better choice than i, e, 5, u, 3, 2. Frequency 55 Figure 3. A Histogram.Showing the Weighted Score in Ability to Choose and Place Correct Responses on.the Natural Science Continuum. N = 748 Cases . The weighted score is indicative of the teachers' foundation in teaching in this subject matter area. It is a more inclusive measure than the ability to choose and place the correct acceptable practice in the first place on the continuum; 1.6. placing responses one through six in l, 3, 2, 5, h, 6 order would be a better choice than 1, e, S, u, 3, 2. 56 Ifiigure h. A Histogram Showing the Weighted [Score in Ability to Choose and Place Correct Responses on the Social Science Continuum. N - 714.8 Cases. The weighted score is indicative of the teachers' foundation in teaching in this subject matter area. It is a more inclusive measure than the ability to choose and place the correct acceptable practice in the first place on the continuum; i.e. placing responses one through six in l, 3, 2, 5, h, 6 order would be a better choice than 1, 6, 5, h, 3, 2. Frequency 500 1:90 aka ‘(30 ‘\ Figure 5. the Totals in Weighted Scores of Ability to Choose and Place the Correct Response on the Four Continua: Social Science, and Natural Science. A Histogram Showing Reading, Arithmetic N= 7&8 Cases. A F4 7 1 —4 _l __ _ r ~ “m 7 7 t i} fln 5311:1131 \sx ex fiheo ’1 gheekeaagcx muuk’a_ & §s§ss2s§s¥stsReassesssssésahN Scores 58 Teachers to Place 8 Reading, Arithmetic, Social Science, and Natural Science. A Line Graph Showing a . Comparison of the Weighted Scores Correct Responses on a Continuum in in Ability of 7h Four'Areas: Figure 6. Weighted Scores KEY Reading Arithmetic Social Science Natural Science 59 989 ZIE 60 Problem 2: Measure of use of supervisor as indices of use of child growth principles The Kreitlow Rural Education PhilOSOphy Scale was ad- ministered to the county superintendents of schools of the twelve counties used on the study. The scale contained a set of questions, which when analyzed, give an indication of philoSOphy in one of the three following categories: (1) academic, (2) pregressive, or (3) community center. The subject matter totals are the accumulation of the total initial number given on the respective continua. This information is given in Table VIII, page 61. For example: in Antelope county there were sixty-two teachers who ran up a total initial response in reading of 230 points, in arith- metic 131; points, in social science 86 points, and in natural 331311068109 points. Since in the continuum responses a 'one' is significantly a better choice than, say a 'four', it would fOIlOw that the better a person teaches and uses good child development concepts within an area, the lower will be the scope - This total was run for each county on the study, as "611 ‘as for each area on the continue. In the column headed 'total' the scores from all four teaching areas were added and this number entered. With all these figures one still has no way of knowing whether teachers in Ante10pe, for ex- ample, teach as well or better than the teachers in another county since there were not the same number of teachers in each county. To arrive at a comparable figure the average was computed and entered in a column labeled: Average 61 o.H ~.H ooa m.a mm e.H Hm M.H mm m.a mm a ma assuage: H.m How m.H o.m m .H .m o m m possess as Head: . m.m m.m mam m.H as m.m mm m.m mm o.m as 3 am nausea» H.m mmm .H a: a.H lea H.m mm H.m mm 0 am amao «posed spasm o.m m.H 0mm m.a w: :.a m: ®.H mm ~.m :w e an eopmnsna o.a mmm :.H as m.H do o.m mo m.m mma o : concepm e.H mam m.H o: m.H a: m.a me o.m we m m appeam ~.H aem :.H H :.H me a.H om m.m eHH m we conned: H.m one s.H o e.H emfl m.m emm o.m saw 0 so none o.m one m.H ama m.a sea H.m omm H.m can 0 sea pace ~.m Hmm ~.H o m.H mm :.m op m.m mo s cm gonna H.m ma: o.a we :.a we m.m HHH m.m Hod : om apogee m.m wan m.H so m.” em H.m a» m.m oma : am menace m.m em a.H Hma m.H oma :.m sea m.m omm m me peace m.H ma :.~ mm m.~ we o.m maa m.m Hes om \ oeoom m.m omm m.H sea :.a em m.m and a.m omm e we edoaoeqe dxmdanoz OV HOV Tm HOV SN HOV SS HOV V HOV H .dS HN O mu ”ma w wmm mm Mm“ mm mmm w mm“ m wm am m d7“ Id?“ 8 Id?“ an .idJ GI Tied n+ stud D. 38 O u 08 HOB .1 U0 UJ UOB U8 UOB U. HOB I. OJ arm ,4 83 as 83 3 83 0 B 3 Son OT on 88 u 9 Son u JA 1.9 K Tre 1:8 Txe “art 7:9 .e Tye a 1:9 as .& 7:8 4. Q Q Q .+ 4 Q S "do one 9 e e e .& e 0 Qua. fl. 0 J 9 Has A J 8.4 S 49 To u on moeonmmDm awe OS ammomqaxme oszoama mo m mqm<8 62 Composite Rating. The supervisory factor determined for the Kreitlow scale was entered in Column 3, and once for Nebraska, once for South Dakota, and once for Michigan in Column 1h. With the addition of this factor one can judge whether the type of supervision in some way affects the teacher responses. Th is value will be used at a later point in the study for comparison purposes. A com; of the Kreitlow Scale appears in Appendix A. Problem 3: Correlation of the ability to incorporate child growth principles within subject matter areas as given in point 3 page 3 and the questionnaire with various personal data items. The Pearson method for obtaining a correlation measure was 8Lpplied to the ability to place correct responses on the preper rung of the continuum with each of the following: 8 (1) the age of the teacher, (2) the extent of help received from cOllege courses dealing with child growth, (3) the recency of training, (h) the number of college hours accumu- lated, (5) the munber of years of teaching experience. With regard to age the correlation was found to be -0016 + .02. ‘ With regard to extent of help the correlation was 31 .+. -02. With regard to number of college hours the correlation ”as “'03 + .02. 63 'w' ith regard to recency of training the correlation was ..007 i 0020 With regard to the number of years of teaching experience the correlation was .001'1r i .02. It should be noted that this set of correlations was run us ing the initial response to each of the four areas of the curriculum as the item correlated with the ability to place correct responses on the preper rung of the continuum. A sub problem of problem 3: The effectiveness of the teacher in more than one area of the continua. In order to determine whether or not a teacher whovwas aware of acceptable child growth principles in the teaching or: Say, arithmetic, was also aware of these same principles 5-“ the teaching of another subject for which continuum re- SPOnSes were given, again the Pearson method for determining the cOrrelations was applied. It should be noted here, that the Weighted score was used in determining this set of corre- lations. The results were as follows: The correlation of being aware of child growth principles in the teaching of reading and in arithmetic, .29 i .01}; 0f Peadi-ng and social science, .166 _-I_- .021” 01‘ reading and natural science, .17 .1’. .02. The correlation between arithme- tic Ellid natural science, .23 i .02; of arithmetic and social science, .20 1 .02. The correlation of social science and m3”nu-"a1 science was .157 1 .02. 6).}, A sub problem of problem 3: Determining‘the progression on the continuum. ‘JI‘he teachers who identified good teaching practices in the four continuum areas may not have known the progression related to the time certain techniques were the accepted practice. It was, therefore, apparent that another distinctly set of comparisons might throw added light on the original tenets of the study. Table IX, on the following page, shows the number of teachers who were able to locate from the six possible reaponses in reading, for example, the best choice as ascertained from the texts examined and place that choice at the top of the continuum, indicating a knowledge of the best response of the place to put it in relation to the others . The next group was able to refine their thinking some- what and was able to pick practices rated as first and second and to place them on rungs 'one' and 'two' respectively. The neXt group could pick responses 'one?, 'two' and 'three', and place them in the correct places on the continuum. There were not enough totally poor choosers to get much to measure in the making of very poor choices. Even though the number was small, the figures are included for inspection. A Sub problem of problem 3: Goodness of choice. The ability to make good choices, which is stated in Table IX, can be seen more directly in the rectangular graphs, Figures, 7, 8, 9, and 10 respectively. These graphs show that the per cent in the larger square also includes the two lesser TAE‘IE IX PMCEHENT or FIRST, FIRST AID SECOND, AND FIRST, SECOND, AND THIRD CHOICES ON was CONTINUUM IN THE AREAS OF READING, ARITthTIC, SOCIAL dCIthd, AND NATURAL SCIENCE Read- Arithme - S oc ial Natural .. 135 tic TOval Science Science Total whose first choice was one 18L;r 388 601 M79 1,687 Total whose first and second choices were one and two U1 \1 (I) C.\ 229 367 762 Total wh ose first, second, and third choices were one, two, and three 23 [is 109 113 295 Total whose first choice were six 35 LL 3 0 11,2 Total whose first and second choices were 31.x and five Total wh ose first, second. and third choices were six, five, and four Percents . The smaller the area covered by the least per cent, the fewer the number of teachers who see prOgression in method by being able to identify and to locate the tap three I'lll'igs of the continuum correctly. The larger the area the better the application of child growth principles. Figure 7 A Rectangular Graph Showing a Three Way Relationship 2111 Ability to Place Responses One, Two and Three; (3116 and Two; and One Respectively in Correct Order on the Reading Continuum. N = 7h8 Cases. 2’IAZ 7-“? 5‘7. I 231L.6% Represents 18h Teachers Whose First Choice in Placement of the First Response Was One one the Continuum. 7'.6% Represents 57 Teachers Whose First and Second Choice in Placement of the First Two Responses Was One and Two on the Continuum. 23.1% Represents 23 Teachers Whose First, Second, and Third Choice in Placement of the First Three Responses Was One, Two, and Three. A 67 PfilfliPe 8 fhecrtangular Graph Showing a Three Way Relationship 111 .Ability to Place Responses One, Two, and Three; One and Two; and One Respectively in Correct Order on the Artithmetic Continuum. N = 7ho Cases 5/.9 ‘Z Represents 388 Teachers Whose First Choice in Placement of the First Response Was One one the Continuum. Represents 86 Teachers Whose First and Second Choice in Placement of the First Two Responses Was One and Two on the Continuum. Represents us Teachers Whose First, Second, and Thrird Choice in Placement of the First Three Responses Was One, Two, and Three Respectively. 68 Figure 9 A Rectangular Graph Showing a Three Way Relationship :111 Ability to Place Responses One, Two, and Three; One and Two; and One Respectively in Correct Order on the Social Science Continuum. 80.3% 30.6% 114. . 65;; N = 7&8 Cases. 30.37 30-67, I‘M‘Z Represents 601 Teachers Whose First Choice in Placement of the First Response Was One on the Continuum. Represents 229 Teachers Whose First and Second Choice in Placement of the First Two Responses Was One and Two on the Continuum. Represents 109 Teachers Whose First, Second, and Third Choice in Placement of the First Three Responses Was One, Two and Three Respectively. 69 Figure 10 A Rectangular Graph Showing a Three Way Relationship :111 iAbility to Place Responses One, Two, and Three; One and Two; and One Re3pectively in Correct Order on the Natural Science Continuum. N = 7R8 Cases («04 49.1% 15.12 614.0% Represents 14.79 Teachers Whose First Choice in Placement of the First Response Was One on the Continuum. ”9-:lée .Represents 367 Teachers Whose First and Second. Choice in Placement of the First Two Responses Was One and Two on the Continuum. ILL-(5% Represents 113 Teachers Whose First, SecOnd,. and Third Choice in Placement of the First Three Responses Was One, Two, and Three Respectively. .- at , ...«..‘IV 70 Problem LL: Single indices from the questionnaire related to those who identified applications of good child growth principles in each of the areas. If a teacher could get choices one and two on their preper mngs of the continuum, she would be considered, in the judgnent of the author, a good teacher showing adequate handling of child growth principles. In order to relate the ones wrio were able to do this to the personal data side of the questionnaire, the component bar graph was used to show these relationships. Figures ll, 12,13, 1‘4, 15, and 16 on pages 71-72, show these relationships in the area of reading. Figures 17 through 22 on pages 73-734 show the same type of relationships for arithmetic. Figures 23 through 28 on Pages 75-76 show the relationships for social science. Figures 29 through 314, on pages 77-78 show the samefor natural science. The whole bar in each case represents the total number in the entire study who could get the first two responses correctly placed. The circle graphs in Figures 35-39 compiled from the materials in Tables X—XIV give an overall picture of the entire sample as related to the personal data factors, namely experience, age, extent of felt help, number of college hours, and recency of training. B Y Observing the greater percentages one can generalize concerning the "MB teachers. (lomponent par Graphs Showing Percentages oflx Total Cases Who Identified Good Teaching FIGURE 11 q ‘ IXEZEB of the Cases Who Identified Good Teaching Practices in Reading (Choices One and Two in Correct Order). N = 57. One 3/16 Inch Square = Two Teachers. 0:14.er @1194) 2.1-24 - z:- 45-- no...“ (“.370 4;; (2: (I875) FIGURE Tfieexrs of Teaching Experience of the Cases Who Ident- ified Good Teaching Practices in Reading (Choices One and Two in Correct Order). N = 57. One 3/16 Inch Square = Two Teachers. u>\,_ Less Than 1 car .2-4 yrs. 517 if" orerXJ (5'5”; . (22-8943 60.53 ‘5 § Q‘8%) (57—57 357.) FIGURE '7 Arrlount of College Training im Semester Hours of Cases Who Identified Good Teaching Practices in Reading (Choices One and Two in Correct Order). N = 57. One 3/16 Inch Square = Two Teachers. I» . 3/. 60-9 1: 125314;; 30 . Is (I 53,51 (8.3% 72 (Scamponent Bar Graph Showing Percentages of Total Cases Who Identified Good Teaching, con't. FIGURE 1 Reacency of Training of Cases Who Identified Good Teaching Practices in Reading (Choices One and Two in Correct Order). N = 57. One 3/16 Inch Square = Two Teachers. Last year 2~ 43/6- 5‘7 7 5-z4yr5.ago 0 0 . (- (66.471) (”5%) as I ( 8%) (537,) FIGURE 1; C3<3urse Titles Which Dealt with Growth Concepts in Teaching Reading. 60 Titles Given by 57 Teachers. One 3/16 Inch Square = Two Titles Educ 1‘ a? P I l o 7— o' '6 “WM, ‘2 I 50‘1“, » ps‘ia‘fizgq EB r "2125-8 72) and. Ch. ercnt 0' wgrowl"? E (249%) f (25.3%; , 06.2 96) f FIGURE J? iEhxtent of Help in Teaching Which the College Courses Taken Were Considered to Have Given. N = 57. One 3/16 Inch Square = Two Teachers. N0 50 Much V2 ti as» ea ~ (g; m» ' ' pig»! 73 (3cmgponent Bar Graph Showing Percenta es of Total Cases Who Identified Good Teaching, con't. FIGURE 1' £¥£g€s of the Cases Who Identified Good Teaching Practices in Arithmetic (Choices One and Two in Correct Order). N = 66. One 3/16 Inch Square = Three Teachers. ”M” ’~' (4.... e253.) ea.) 34 FIGURE 1” ‘Efearc of Teaching Experience of the Cases Who Ident- ified Good Teaching Practices in Arithmetic (Choices One and Two in Correct Order). N = 86. One 3/16 Inch Square = Three Teachers. Less +5... lyr.(7¢4%> A 264 3-7 ' FIGURE L’ 1‘kmount of College Training in Semester Hours of Cases Who Identified Good Teaching Practices in Arith- metic (Choices One and Two in Correct Order). N = 86. One 3/16 Inch Square = Three Teachers. 1 0k . 3/15956- 60-9066. --0 We L6I53T2'073 3 rs (I432) (20.9%) (ff?) thin. . Component Bar Graph Showing Percentages of Total Cases Who Identified Good Teaching, con't. FIGURE 23 Recency of Training of Cases Who Identified coed Teaching Practices in Arithmetic (Choices One and Two in Correct Order). = 86. One 3/16 Square = Three Teachers. Last) ear 2.149 n: (62.8%) (17. 9%;{5’7 (l4. qoflwflgfi FIGURE 2‘ Course Titles Which Dealt with Handling Children in Teaching Arithmetic (Choices One and Two in Correct Order). 10h Titles Given by 86 Teachers. One 3/16 Square= Three Titles. EMm‘ P 0‘ Print; Its 0‘ Eachhg Chi“ GWHW Dev. 53:“ I (25.1%)"d‘ 52.77;) (30 82) (86%) (29” L ’ 7' *FIGURE 2 5." Extent of Help in Teaching Arithmetic Which the College Courses Were Considered to Have Given. N = 86. One 3/16 Square = Three Teachers. 'a. a Huh NH 2337 {27.97. (53 5%) (D (m (m) .1.“ Component Bar Graph Showing Percentages of Total Cases Who Identified Good Teaching, con't. FIGURE 21 Age of the Cases Who Identified Good Teaching Practices in Social Sciences (Choices One and Two in Correct Order). N = 229. One 3/16 Square = Six Teachers. . 2 21-2 2/.82; 25144 . 45-59 Under“ (546%) 5” ) ((4.8%) (7% uflrfia (09%) FIGURE 2 Years of Teaching Experience of the Cases Who Ident- ified Good Teaching Practice in Social Sciences (Choices One and Two in Correct Order). N = 229. One 3/16 Square = Six Teachers. , . 24/ «m. {-Mrs- 6’44 I ”(gib' 3' (2% z) “0%) (‘5 i _ oar: FIGURE 2‘ Amount of College Training in Semester Hours of Cases Who Identified Good Teaching Practices in Social Sciences (Choices One and Two in Correct Order). N = 229. One 3/16 Square = Six Teachers. a L£$5égrwk550)“1 Zihzgg) ' (”57% Component bar Graph Showing 76 Percentages of Total Cases Who Identified Good Teaching, con't. FIGURE 26 Recency of Training of Cases who Identified Good Teaching Practices in Social Sciences (Choices One and Two in Correct Order). = 229. One 3/16 Square 2 Six Teachers Lost 03;)ar (49.; FIGURE 27 .Z*49%S.ogo'5'73 (’7' o’.) b." 1" 2.11'7’ Course Titles Which Dealt with Handling Children in Teaching Social Sciences (Choices One and Two in Correct Order). 25h Course Titles Given by 229 Teachers. One 3/16 Square = Eight Titles. Educa‘l'ienal % Fhuiohgq ‘3 456%) Prnhnccples “Ming (315%) (:ALH GimmfliflDulifi (33. 47;) as; Pee-m (03%) ‘6 (”we FIGORs 28 («39%) EXtent of Help in Teaching Social Sciences Which the College Courses Were Considered to Have Given. $391) = 229. Some (16.25) "(553-474) One 3/16 Square = Six Teachers. '39:) (2. a (Somponent Bar Graph Showing Percentages of Total Cases Who Identified Good Teaching, con't. FIGURE 29 Age of the Cases Who Identified Good Teaching Practices in Natural Science (Choices One and Two in Correct Order). = 367. One 3/16 Square = Ten Teachers. 55-970 2/724 (24 3% 25-‘1/445-5 Under 2.! ( > > 02% (81%) 7 overéo (93%) FIGURE 30 Years of Teaching Experience of the Cases Who Ident- ified Good Teaching Practices in Natural Science (Choices One and Two in Correct Order). = 367. One 3/16 Square = Ten Teachers. Less than \qr. 65.9%) 2-4qu. (31.1%) 5372:).8 (’1’ :51 "' over 25' (03%) FIGURE 31 Afluaunt of College Training in Semester Hours of Cases Who Identified Good Teaching Practices in Natural Science (Choices One and Two in Correct Order). =1367. One 3/16 Square = Ten Teachers. c Hm 50k . 31-5 11 60 90hr5 L 55 (51.87.) 5 ‘ Z2697”? (x. 67) 75;.) 78 (30mponent bar Graph Showing Percentages of Total Cases Who Identified Good Teaching, con't. FIGURE 3 ' liescency of training of Cases Who Identified Good Teaching Practices in Natural Science (Choices One and Two in Correct Order). N = 367. One 3/16 Square = Ten Teachers. La + car 7. qrsago 5:7 4 (570.071) ”4%) (z *‘ FIGURE 3'3 ’5‘“ ”’1‘ 04%) (0-32?) CICIurse Titles Which Dealt with Handling Children in Teaching Natural Science (Choices One and Two in Correct Order). h7h Titles Given by 367 Teachers. One 3/16 Square = Twelve Titles. 54.. annals”. ' Omens .; Raking am €row+h and 0... am (lo-9:) 6W) ”"79 are, Pct-.331 Q-7z)(5.073 FIGURE 3 Ebttent of Help in Teaching Natural Science Which the College Courses Were Considered to Have Given. N = 367. One 3/16 Square = Ten Teachers. None S (I4 2%) (269%) D2535 z) thflnh «fl 4 .-+ \l :3 6 i2 3» i3 D 1'4 7n. 26,52 Less ”ion 17"4692 x‘ .; {—1 ..~ .-. Q ’1 v 4 ,’ ...... V,“ 7 \-.' . \ K "3.. ~24! 35-4! I512 2’, 2.2.37; 5- O 4 4 7‘8" UnlerZJ 544% \ Y: Y m .3 .3 Bl w it) \ , n 0 some 265/, NO“ I&‘77. Grad 2.5 .0?" chfl "‘0th Much 55.5% 13“,} L , ,r, a.» 51-59605JZZJ7’ 60:90 I»; 16.97, Deg ree.‘ /_. Le 6470 $5 {-kan 30 “'5' CD N 83 z-wrs ago 5‘" year 69-32; La CHAPTbR V CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS Perhaps after reading Wofford's summary: The characteristics of the rural teacher and her work becann evident and persistent throughout the study from 1890 through 1930: (a) the feminization of the rural teaching group, (b) the youthfulness and the inexperi— ence of the group, (c) the instability of rural teaching as a profession, (d) the low financial rewards in the field, (e) low standards of scholastic and professional preparation in the field of rural teaching. there would be little need to summarize further. However, since some of the hypotheses (page 7) and most of the instru- ments were not like those used in the Nofford study, some generalizations may be made. Conclusions Problem 1: Of the areas of the curriculum which were used for investigation in this study, statements regarding reading bear the least evidence of the application of good child growth principles. Whether the use of the weighted score, which was related to the teacher's knowledge of the pregression of method as shown in Figure 1 (page 53), or the use of the rated score which is related to the ability to choose the most acceptable practice in terms of current use &8 shown in Table IX, and Figure 7, pages 65 and 66 respec- tively, reading shows that it is being taught with little 8’4- application of child growth principlas and with very little realization of the progression of method. There is more agreement with regard to arithmetic, (Figure 2, page S ). Teachers are doing ruck better than in reading, as one may see by noting the high pile up of weighted scores which would suggest that the use of methods are not more than ten years out of date. The evenness of the next Pr .hree grOUpS and the freQUencies piled up in them Should giVe no cause to relax methods courses at the college level concerning the teaching of arithmetic. Natural science (Figure 3, page 55) shows evidence of being taught by modern concepts, which might be expected in Nebraska since this subject area was the last to gain a place in the Nebraska curriculum. Natural science, therefore, had 1 a much newer approach where method was concerned tnan did the other subject matter areas discussed here. It evidences the application of better child growth principles even in its beginnings. The best showing of the four areas was made by the social sciences (Figure h, page 56). The cause for this is not clear. It caild be related to the emphasis social science has had in Nebraska's teacher traininv courses since _ o the integration of geOgraphy, history, and civics has taken effect. Figure 5, page 57, shows that, generally speaking, the use of newer methods is prevalent over methods used more than ten years ago. 1ese findings are emphasized in the 86 line graph in Figure 6, paqes 58 and 59. One added point can be discerned from this graphic picture; in the area of the weighted scores 720 to 660, all the areas make very good showing, while reading does nearly as high as the lowest point cn the entire graph for the other three areas covered by the continuum. Another point of interest is, that in the areas of arithmetic, social science, and natural science, the practices in effect twenty-five years 850 can hardly be measured, since the reSponses are so few. Problem 2: The evidence sugg sts that supervision is not a very adequate factor with regard to the application of child growth principles to a Specific method used by those under a person designated as a supervisor. For example: Madison and Platte counties and Gratiot county in Michigan were community oriented in the phiICSOphy of the supervisor (Appendix), but when the average composite rating was made for these counties (Table VIII, page 61), it should be noted that in each case he average is considerably closer to a number two than to a number one rating. This would indicate that (l) the teachers may not get enough help in evolving suitable methods or (2) the help they do get may not agree with the child growth principles which they were taught to use in their college methods classes, thus causing diSpari— t es. H- From Table VIII on page 61 one may see again that the reading continuum average is consistently higher, meaning that it incorporates fewer child growth principles than any 87 cu’the other subject areas. In all Nebraska counties the order of their listing on the table is reading, arithmetic, natural science and social science. This means that when the effectiveness of teaching is considered in relation to the choice of correct reSponses, reading is least well tatht, followed by arithmetic, natural science, and social science, respectively. Problem 3: One of the major findings of the study involves the results of the correlation of certain items found on the personal data questionnaire to the ability to teach as exhibited in the teachers choice and the placement of responses in correct order on the teaching continuum. When age was the factor correlated to ability, the corre- lation was negative (-.16 i .02). This refutes the statement heard in educational circles, 'If these older teachers would Just go back to school . . .' or 'These young teachers don't know what teaching is all about.‘ There seemed to be no relationships at all between the two parameters, within the limitations of the instruments used in this study. When the recency of training was the factor correlated to ability, the finding was also negative (-.007 i .02) which would again, in so far as this limited study was concerned, refute the statement that how lately a teacher had received her training would somehow relate to how well she could choose modern methods. It could mean, upon further investi- gation, that the teacher who stayed on her job also keeps up with the current educational method. There were not enough t! ~71. 88 data to make this statement hold true within the premise of this study, however. Another correlation involved the use of the number of college hours the teacher has and the ability to teach. This correlation was also found to be negative (-.03 1 .02). We could say that, within the limits of this study, the amount of education a teacher has hears little relation to how she teaches. Two measures in this group bore positive relationships: the extent of help the teacher felt the college classes had given (.21 I .02) and the number of years of teaching eXperi- ence (.OOh 1 .02). The first of these two bears a stronger relationship and is a significant finding to the five per cent level. What.it seems to say is: If a teacher thinks her college classes were of help to her in her profession, they were. It becomes, then, a matter of attitude. This Significant finding is in line with the current educational deneralizations of the day. Tie relationships with regard to years of teaching experience has a low but positive value. Perhaps if the personal data measuring instrument was further refined some significant clue to ability to teach could be found. It is strong enough to warrant further investigation.‘ A phrase often heard in educational circles is eXpressed 1n the statement, 'She's a born teacher'. One of the original tenets of this study involved finding whether being a good teacher in one area means teaching well in other areas of the curriculum. The Pearson correlation formula was used to 8‘? determine if significant relationships were evident within the limits of this study. Between good teaching in reading and good teaching in arithmetic the correlation was .29 i .01). This means that those who picked good arithmetic practices rated significantly higher in their choice of good reading; practices. Reading, however, did not bear high relationships with any other field. (social science .16, natural science ~17) . Arithrret ic consistently showed high correlations with SOcial science and natural science (.20 and .23, respectively). h34332101151; these correlations are not significant beyond the one pep cent level there seems to be some evidence that if one desired to pick a good teacher he need only to know how the teacher teaches arithmetic (and could therefore see evidence or 500d child growth principles), he would have reason to believe that this teacher could also teach effectively in o . . tter areas of the curricular. This study was concerned with relative 'goodness of tea . . . ch 1113' as well as trying to determine tne status of the e. “eaching done within the limits of the data known. Table DC, 853‘ ‘ 4. p ‘38 65, shows the figures taxen from the continuum ratings to 1 l m 191:2. us see this picture. both extremes are shown -- tho . 88 Who choose well and those who seemingly do not recognize a .- l gobd measure when they see it in print. Again, in ability to chOOSe the best response, the reading statistic is by far the . lOWest. Note reading 18h, arithmetic 188, social science I €301 ’ and natural science 1.5-79. These figures include only thoge who could pick the first response but who may not have C) 0 had. any of the other five responses in correct order. In other words, they knew current practice but not necessarily methodoloSy. The field narrows quickly, however, when we look for those who can pick responses one and two correctly. This holds true for all the areas, but is particularily true of reading responses. In two instances first and second choices (6 and S) were found, but abain those two choices were in the area of resting. Only in the field of reading, were enoubh number (2 response: to show on a (graph of any sort. Even in t‘oe field of reading; no one placed responses six, five , and four as first, second, and third on the continuwn. ”0 one was completelyr out of line although forty-two were dangerously so. In order to show this concept ngphically the peaCttangular graph, unlike others the author has seen, ShOWs, the entire sample as a square, of which the least square Part of each of the two succeeding; squares as well av. “1353 two being a part of the whole. At one blance one can 399 how the parts fit in relation to each other and to the .1,1, ‘ ) — w-ole - Figures 7, 8, C), and 1c, pages, (>6, 67, 66, and 6‘? sh ow th is relationship for reading, arithmetic, soc 1 science, }—0 in am a. . 1 ”qtural selence, respectively. One of the more interesting findings of the study, not inc . 341de in the original tenets, involved using the single ind V 1093, 1,.;, the age, the recency of training, etc., and finc -' 1th}; which of the teachers who could pick Chad responses f6]. 0 q :; 1 33'1th these categories. The component bar 5r1‘k: Longmans Green, 1953. Hurlock, Elizabeth. Child Growth and Development. New York: I“'1C3C3rameill, 1956- Kenne dy, Stella A. "A Survey of School Teachers Attitudes toMrard Problems in Education," Unpublished Doctoral Thesis, Los Angeles: The University of Southern Cfillifornia, 1951;. K ern, 0. J. Among Country Schools. New York: 1906. 97 Kowitz, Gerald. ”An Exploration into the Relationship of Physical Growth Pattern and Classroom Behavior in the Elementary School," Doctoral Thesis, Michigan State College of Agriculture and Applied Science, 1951;. Kreitlow, Burton. Rural Education: Community Backgrounds. blew York: Harper Brothers, 1951i. Mart in, Everett D. Psychology and Its Use. Chicago: American Library Association, 1925. Millard, Cecil V. Child Growth and Development. Boston: Heath Company, 1951. Nelly, Thomas. "The Relationships Between Achieved Growth in Height and the Beginning of Growth in Reading," Doctoral Thesis, Michigan State College of Agriculture and Applied Science, 1953. National Education Association. The White House Conference of Rural Educatiop. .‘Jashington: Department of Rural Education of the Ivational Education Association, 19b,h. National Society for the Study of Education. The Status _c_>_f_' Rural Education. Thirtieth Yearbook, Bloomington, IIiincis: Public School Publishing Co., 1931. ' £9125. ind Notes _o_i_‘_ Rural Education, January, 1921. Nyberg, Dorothy. A Short History _c_)_f_ Wayne County. Wayne, Nebraska: The Wayne Herald, 1930. Olson, Willard. Growth _c_>_i_‘_ the Child §__s_ _a_ Whole. New York: MCGraw—Ilill Book Company, 1943. P6333: Theodore 0., ed. The Laws of the Northwest Territori- S,pI‘1ngfield, Illinois: The Trustees of the Illinois bhate Historical Society, 1925. Plato (F‘rancis Cornford Translation). The Republic 2i; Plato. New York: The Oxford Press, 19345. Beevgs, Floyd W., ed. Educatiop for Rural America. Chicago: I) Varsity of Chicago Press, 19E . Rufi, N JCalm. "The Small School," Contribution to Education uh'lber 1:26, Teachers College Columbia Univ-ffsity, I9 55. Ru ch’ Ii‘uben. "The Relationships Between Growth in Height and Growth in Weight," Doctoral Thesis, Michigan State Ollege of Agriculture Wied Science, 1951+. 98 Shuttleworth, W. A. The Adolescent Period. Volume II, 1J0. 5, Evanston, Illinois: MonOgraph of Society Child IJevelopment Research. Southall, Naycie. "Contributions to Individual Instruction," liewer Types 92 Instruction _i_g Small Rural Schools, 1935 Yearbook of Rural Education, Washington: National Edu- cation Association, 1935. Stonman, Merle A. "Improving Instruction in Rural Areas," Educational Leadership, VIII, January, 1951. Tucker, Marion B. "The Shoe Didn't Fit," National Education Association Journal, Volume [4.5, Number 3, March, 1956. Udoh, Benson. "The Relationship of Menarche to Achieved Growth in Height," pectoral Thesis, Michigan State College of Agriculture and Applied Science, 1955. United States Advisory Commission on Education. The Federal Government and Education. Washington: Government Print- ing Office,j9h5. Wofford, Kate V. "An History of the Status and Training of Elementary Rural Teachers of the United States, 1860- 1930," Unpublished Doctoral thesis, Columbia University, New York, 1931;. Woffgrd, Kate V. "Socialization of the School Curriculum," ewer T es 93 Instruction _i_n_ Small Rural Schools, 1935 Yearbook of‘ Rural Education, Washington: National Education Association, 1935. ‘vlofford Kate V Teachinr in Small Schools New York° The - a e ’ ‘ '"" t k . . Macmillan Company, 19116. APPENDIX LIST OF APPENDIXES Pa Ere APPENDIX A. Check List Distinguishing Among Three Philosophies Of Education 0 o o o o 101 APPENDIX B. Questionnaire and Judgment Continuum. . 10% APPENDIX C. Relative Location of the Counties Used in the Study with the Supervisory Factor Superimposed within Each County. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10h APPENDIX D. Recordings from Original Responses to the Questionnaire and Judgment Type Continuum with Key and Code . . . . 105 APPENDIX E. Assigned Values Placed on ReSponses to- Judément Type Continuum Used as weighted Scores . . . . . . . . . . 137 APPENDIX F. Sumnary Of Initial Child Growth concepts. 0 o o o o o o o o o o o 0 lug 100 101 APPENDIX A CHECK LIST DISTINGUISHING AMONG THREE PHILOSOPHIES OF EDUCATION Judge each of the following statements in the light of your own philosophy of education. From the scale below select the code number that best (Escribes your agreement with the statement. If you agree cmufletely with Item 1, place a one (1) in the blank pre- ceding the item. If you disagree completely place a five G” in the proper blank. If you are neutral regarding the statement, place a three (3) in the proper blank. If your reaction to the statement is between 1 and 3 place a two (2) in the proper blank, etc. Answer every item. SCALE ‘ 1 2 s T‘s ‘ Full Neutral Complete agreement disagreement ”wool. The child is innately good and should be allowed to grow naturally. u...2. Learning should be organized around the problems and processes of community living. .....3. The child must be disciplined if he is to become a civilized human being. n...h. The pupils should help the teacher plan their learning activities so they will be following their interests. ”a..5. The child is neither good nor bad, but may become either depending upon his eXperiences. u...6. The curriculum should be centered around reading, arithmetic, spelling, social sciences, language, science, and like subjects. ”00.7. How a child feels about what he learns is as impor- tant as what he learns. .....8. A child should gain knowledge and thus he will be- come educated. .....9. Teacher—pupil planning is necessary for the develop- ment of good citizenship in a democracy. /""10' .....11. .....12. .....13. .n».lh. .....15. 0000.16. 0:00.17. 00.0.1 0 00.0019. 00.00200' 0.00.21. 0000022. .....23. on..2h. 102 Learning activities should be determined by, and centered around pupil interests. The community is a source of learning materials and experiences. Competition and rivalry are the best incentives to pupil achievement. School children should have a part in activities to improve the community. Good books are the best source of learning for the child in school. The evaluation of the child's learning.should be based on how well he is able to solve his daily problems. A basic aim of education is to help the children comprehend, and express their feelings about their experiences. The study of geometry develops a logical mind. The child realizes his best self in situations where he can creatively express himself. The school has a responsibility to help make the community a better place in which to live. Standard achievement tests are the best means of determining if or not a child should be promoted. Any teacher must know the community thoroughly and be able to use its resources to be a success- ful teacher. Education may be thought of as growth, especially in the ability to reconstruct past experiences to solve problems. Understanding is best promoted by a 10gical develop- ment of the course of study. The school child should be encouraged to concern himself with important adult problems. ‘ SCORING DETERMINENTS: Academic Orientation Progressive Orientation Community Oriented Score Question Score Question Score Question 3 1 2 5 u 6 8 7 10 12 '"-___' 10 11 1h ""‘"“' 15 13 17 "” 16 19 20 "" 18 21 23 “"“' 22 Total Total Total Composite rating A APPENDIX B - , ' 103 QUESTIOMIAIRE AND JUDQMENT CONTINUUM ld ”lent hheretery Office of liral Mention] shi— ltete College State Teachers College I‘ll-J, lithiu- 'ayne, Nebraska larch 29. 1955 leer Thacher: -----‘ Intel edncstien and child developnent are inpertsnt nerds in yoir life! That anst be so be- csnse yes teach in s raral area. °'°-" In order to carry eat a research study in rare! edacstioa I need yoar cooperation. ---°-' If yes sill frsnhly check the necessity facts and state year opinions on the following ta- bles yen will he doing raral edacation a real ser- vice. -----‘ Plesse feel free to give connents on any phase of child develop-eat as it pertains to your own case. Year reactions are inportant to the C‘."e -°---° Yon nsy retnrn the conpleted ferns in the enclesed self-addressed envelope. Your pronpt re- tsrs sill be treated by code naaber and not by nnne: therefore it will not be necessary to sign year sane. Thanh Yon. aéevf7‘% State Thachers College Ieyne, Nebraska If yes sish to have an abstract of this stady fill oat the nailing label below. lens 'tI'OOt C'. .e'ene Pest Office y! w" ' PART 1. QUESTIONNAIRE PERSONAL INFORMATION FORM (EuchChe Code Michigan 1. My school is in Nebraska (County) S. Dahots Place a check nark (vfl on the line over the response which best describes your case. 2e ASCseeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee Und-r 21-24 25-44 45-59 0'" 21 years years years ‘0 years years 30 Marital Statuaeeseeeeeeeeeee [ lfi *- Isrried [smug D"::¢'¢J‘idned Separate 4e SCXeseeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee 1 Isle I 'ensle 5. Teaching Experience......... than ’I.. l T"- 2-4 s-7 15-24 “" 1". ’II. ’II. J 6. Amount of College Training.. ~89 eo-oo degree none less [31 than hrs. hrs. 30 hrs. ., 7. Kind of College Attended.... 1 i i r i State Private State Univ. Univ. ‘l’eefh. Teach. _ Cblege Private ether Cblhnp 8. Recency of Training......... l l l - last 3-4 5- 8-17 10-24 "’3 a yr. yrs. yrs. yrs. yrs. ‘- ago ago ago age 35“,."- 9. When you were preparing for teaching, which of the follow- ' ing titles were used in the college catalogue to describe the course you took which dealt with handling children? l l n 44 1 i _ Pedagody Educational Chi ld [p.rmugyl Principles Ollld I'eci fy P Ml Stud 05-“ of “y "c a“ . y “"1 t Teaching Develop-ant et her 10. To what extent did these courses offer you direct, usable help? l l I 1 None Some uch Very nuch hel A great deal I had to learn but most of elp. lost of the in fact near- by experience the book did- book sugges- ly all ny n’t 'Otk. (long 'thod. ’fOblOII '03. answered. 2! yrs. PART 2. JUDGMENT CONTINUUM SUBJECT MATTER CONTINUUM FORM u-u‘ Oaths reverse side of this page is a series of lad- ders, one ladder for reading, one for arithaetic, one for social science and one for natural science. Attached to this side of the page are four sets of responses not ar- ranged in any particular order. ~----‘ The blue responses are for the reading ladder. -----‘ The yellow responses are for the arithmetic. -----' The pinh responses are for the social sciences. .....° The grain responses are for the natural sciences. Begin with the blue reading responses. Heaove then from this page; read then and then place then on the reading ladder (on the reverse side of this page) with the re- sponse :2; consider least advisable to use on the botton rung. Then fill in the rungs until you arrive at the top nost rung with the response which you would judge would represent your best teaching. -----'Place yellow responses in like asnner on the arithaetic ladder. -----’Plsce pinh responses on the social studies ladder. -----‘Do the sane for the green responses on the natural science ladder. -----‘ PLEASE NAIL YOUR RESPONSES PROBPTLY °-°'°- l 00:50. Oh 0. 0e. to to F“ socxst srunrss their progress and how they sworn thenselves is of great isportance in our culture. low people live. what has beeJ lost acceptable ale 0 Read up Least acceptable Pink lead up Iva-roast scxswcs F7 be world at nature bath phys- ical and biological is an in- ertant aspect of eienentary ducatien. lost acceptable J 3 . 1 an. I t ‘00 Hi «I: hiwd col 0 newt 0“.- would «II 0 0‘80: cuau enque 0.8. 0 I IO n 0': nnnu I'D-«OI want: 0 88.... O I. onlwu an A. enah‘ "__——_——‘ «an n 053 0‘ IAI- ‘_————__ n nu soul. : l6. «9 Least acceptable L. as C In I I I .I I I ‘Ia O h ’ l . . r I.:II" b . .3 ... ... r . .e an a a as C I I n U .n .2; .achusuuuumefle n. w n a v I I t waneocoo meoqawlesusl census c o d... I I P 00 Iona ounwce ea coup—3.0 e. Til c l “I. II I u n.- accurev eoauwuancwl «I sex... a d n“ I I u I -- i t I. In I e e a s n t w I t a e l s as I I I I L P... v a. I on a I s a... s ’ O I.- as t I e t all I I II I 'h w I h I: was! t m A x I I e .a t l n e b .. u. . u ._ “. Q h ”Cb'H. 5” C In I O I e 0.09 ,‘9 I O t i n. a hen a. co owns e e run on weep: etc-o ch 0.“ a I c h I¢I- a.oe-wo~w~5bve~leuea~ew~eeae . a e m .it I .I. 900‘» -I~O~I AN~I Ihfi. \ TI t I I. In. t .I I C 0 O~ H‘Q OWQO w I I n n n. O I I . Q «I0 ~¢~0 ¢~O NO I O has. tn / oceans-.3. so. in". u» 35:: 1... l n t e c . . . . .. J . O I c l s d a s . e. I. a e l e l P t .- . . h use. 11' I ‘III a n A 10h @- 4 a Relative Location 0 0g. of the Gounties '3 Used in the Study with the ' \ n Supervisory Factor Super- imposed Within Each County, e K5“. '2. l“ L Genflot ‘4 ? G \ KEY 9‘ Acade C 01-- mi (2 hIlally \ Program 3 sivel YA CODImPi ented uni t Obi Qlillied 40s,—.. l0 .. lee"CI—'—""—' 105 Key to Recording from Original Data Age [jg/Aha- under El-Zh . 25-hh h5-S9 over 60 21 Te aching W \V :nge; Exp erience l I \\ 9112:?3.‘ less than 2-1:. 5-7 - 8-1L. 1 year Auncnxnt of College Q Tra ining K c 4 9}; none less than 31- 60-90 30 hours 59 2:32:38“ I @ 5-7 é-lh 15-21 ‘ over 25 last 2-h year years ago WWW L COIquse ‘=/ V pwwwa Tit1e E12 .\\\ sir-:5 pedagody educat- child person- prin- child rural ional study ality clples growth school . psychology devel- of proced- o ment teac ng ures Extent 7 . °f Help % y " none some much very great much deal Antelope County R Q a ‘251 :ilhlili 73%; fida’gigilfillligsifaliéf’ m ~ __ '~ 1 O “ 1 h ' ~ .g o i Q, ‘1‘ ”a?“ “sh ’5 a? int: ’36 «in has [:1 S E] E w 51,,“- 4 H2356 ./ st'ze I 214536 .2 /0 III I: D S D E m luvs-s I 154/552 / [arse / muse / I? D D % D - [3 souls" 3 But/es 3 24/653/ .2 flea/2.; y’ I?! E D W4 D E \\\\\\ «423’s 4 ”W25 3 3416/54( 3 azure / {96 ® §\§ D - % 4,13,“- 4 192356 [ 13:2“ / 40.2351. I I?)AE___I D D - .\\\\\\\ mess I Iii/£35 I 43¢“ I 14/355 .2 4" a D 421536 4 99/45" 4 ”“33 I 41134; l/ 4‘] E: D % DE S [us-31 / 4/2355 4 ”/3526 / Iii/36$ .2. #2 [:1 E: % D. N 46:13: 4 314/256 3 til/355i I 311“; 3 916” D D [:I E] a 4555/; 1] 4/3552 4 b53415: / 13W?“ ‘2 '57, U h\\\. 7/2 D E 415736 4 auws'e 3 IZV6'36 I ”‘9‘“ I 577E m &\\\\ W/A _4135'15 4 (3.20/65 I 41473“ I ”4355 I 524% % N [:15 @‘auz: 4 W39“ ’ ”‘1" I ”“53 I 52’ 555 % ® DEE m times: 4 5’4““ 3 “W" I 314634. 3 523E! [:1 % DEflmm 4 was- I “may W35 1 5-2JC] :1 D[ D % 7% 1.2634; I 1V3!“ / [154135 I 2/4553 2- E19 % \\\\ MD%EWZJ“ l-/ FBI-1456 3 31”“ 3 "“3" I 215.21%: §§ S - ,1, 3.4,,— _2 314/245 3 124/356 I 4/2355 4 347 E an a N - (was I 234/95 .2. 132415; I awes- I 5‘3a El §\V % D- 4/2365 4 143/53 .1 1316 I 114/635 I 53/ a w @W F’H3165' 4 Manse 4/ {3269’s I Ill/356 / 92 LE] [:1 :1 DE] lanes 4 an!“ 3 ”1’35" 4 24/655 1 533 § % % [3% wave 4 m... 3 "W“ I am; I ‘ 7 S a- w 31245;. 3 I34!“ I I135“. 1 1241396 I E: % % D 7///, Vince 4/ 13/4/56 .2 ’511’5'6 I 1’45” 1 39 % .3- “9,36 4 3,4,,“ 3 algal. / zit/356 I. '0 D % 7/1 D. .\\\\\\\: 235(657 .Z gzvlse 3 ’15-“, I 2/345 1 «I [:1 \\\\\‘: zz [31:] m Manse , mm; , 23w..- 1 must I I2 I: E] % E]- g\\\\‘ new: / Nam ( tar-«u / 2145's; 7. $11: a - m § % ® ads/re 1 awe-e / Ins/st I 0435: I 6146 D C] % D- Edi-1.356 ¢ save-s 3 I’m/SA / morass ( C] [j % Ej- Elva/ass 4 34/526 3 saw“ 2 434526 ( 3. i Antelope County 107 “ " “ \ 75 u “g i “(1°C “ gun-Mao m’: ‘32; “3‘13 0 w 72 $1. 1 x2133}; 9313?“: ‘34“33 \“ “ -n~ 21n1~23n2~1m~ 3.x: *5 o;®°‘%fil"wm%ggc~ «35:. 519-: = 9/9016: 3 av?“ / W235; /o 553- :1 E "5153 _2 Isusu I runs 3‘ 55 - :1 7% 1,4,“ 2 ”54/52 / ”195" X 5 - j E 301/5" 3 nu.“ I A1463: I 7 55'. ’ 3 % 01v.“ / luv“ I 1/9’553 1 5’ 5‘57 :1 = SUV/56 3 an“ / 21/3/65 .2 g S 7% j 2 234,57, _2 as“: I #2351, / 3 $57 I j m IJste / N156: / zwsse _z i 5‘4/ 7% I342“; I 123‘6“ I 141356 / 7 6/2 I I143“ I 2134»- 2 assul 3 /o “3 - I Jill/‘5 3 12.3545 I ~st5 / I/ 6“! V/// - 3’35“ 2. w; 516 I 114535 / 9 6/ 553-2355 & 390526 _3 143126 / ”.4365 / ? 6/6 I 4055 IAN/$36 I ’2’4’55 I 7 6/7 - - yrs-15¢. swan. 5 0.6453 / I2 6/ W .\ \V 7/(4 ”1.056 "55"1 I ’Wibs / 6 ”7 _///// >\\\\‘ fuses raw: 2 veg/23 4 ll . §\\‘§ yea/.5- ans-w, 3 142356 / I3 ‘ZI - - 3/u265 114357, I 3141.56 3 / / ‘11 §\\\ 5;. ”/3 “,5 (zusu / Mil/55‘ 2 5- ‘13 E - 431/56 was: I 541/354, 4/ // ‘sz 215%; 113456 I Ist/sz' I ‘ 7 (.53 E - '39156 213“: 1 nuns / Y 682 ////'/: - 113U65‘ 1/ 34/65 2 luau I 5— ‘83 - - 13 vsze ac/s‘u / N23“ L f; 74 - - 31¢,“ 124/35; I 41/653 7’4 - - 4332/5 43/615 4 zusu/ .2 /‘I 901K :23; 30/465 1: wcs 1 2w“: 1 7 705 m - z/gvs'é Ill/365‘ I zlsws .2 7 95" W ”415-6 nus-o / and I 7 Boone County 108 uh ; § 0 ‘ U M n 1 m k 0‘“ I otwAn-xéxR age-13* AaO-‘KEQE‘étg‘a‘m 3 ‘fir‘gv—I\ZR’— C~~xm3 -Ag‘o—x «g m «wfiwlnaanzazwv 2:32: 5‘ c3 1 w 0‘ n ax 6‘ a i t R tn :1 - 415/ 35 4 few/552 4 I1 W55 I IV351 c I /o - 113456 .2 I431“ / 154/14, 3 IZJV§6 I ’7 - § ”1‘53 I ”4/255 / "/5167. / law‘s I 4 - I325“ I 2/355¢ .2 06¢“ / 115453 I 5 I m'uaIiJ __ /32 465' I /2 31/55 I :1 «I; s 5 I “‘ - % E:— I: 352% / All/36$ I [zgys‘ / /13V55 I LI - 7% $430156 4 44/555 .2 3mm; 3 “/3155 I I 0 I 7% mate I ”W“ I /134/55 I ""2 “’ I ‘I r / ’7 I ///l 102/55 1/ 44355 I I551“ I “3““ / - E “/5235 I /55z5¢ I Isms-5 I ISIS“ I 4 3/255 4 24/355 2 mat/55 2 25/3/15 1 Io - 5/25 "/3255 I 2/5055 ,1 ”255-! I awn. I 5‘ V// / QVIZS“ 3 ’153“ I {135/5‘6 I l23‘/$'6 I 6 I 7 I g 42/355 II 0.41356 / an“; I uws-b I - = 397256 3 0.35% I 31“,“ 3 1131/56 2 9 Y - «Is/525 4 2/4/355 1 I24555 I ’1’“; I 7% :— w2355 II Izsvs‘b / muse; I nth/5‘5 I 7 — - 24/355 .2 ~31“ / ”34“ I [2.3455 1 4 - % V5115“ ‘I I3V515 / “5441 I /25545 I 7 {‘74 E2 ”V536 I ”“55 I lava; l avg/.5; I ‘f m /‘/—2635 I ’3”§26 / /32l/‘5' I 1/,V“- .2 5 § 15/13/5 .2 Ilaso’c / 04/515 I 3u55¢ 3 7 j /2«/355 I 3/¢525 3 Man; I 32/5/55 3 g I S ’14!“ I ””56 / M355 2 12/55; I 5 I 13V155' I 3/5/2 5‘5 3 “/1396 I I “I 356 I 6 :I '3: Isa/25 I max; 3 “:31“ I I24535 / 6 l _ «553/2 ‘I W32 5‘, 4f 4,3,“ [I ”#355 1 H/ I 1/4/552 3 uo’JS‘b 1 214/535 2 3"15'16 3 7 Q 7// Jul/55 3 1%51/ 1 was“ / 1255/53 I _ 7 _I 74 W31“ 4 4/1355 4 mug 3 ”'43“ I /Z :] (Ix/:35 4 III/553 I was; I 2/5/55 1 g 3 ’14-‘75" I 1’34“ 2 0365 / 12.51/55 / 5‘ Boone County 109 €44 Wé 51/ 7/4 H . - tr - fl? - Ito §\‘ [52 7/4 “‘3 - 15‘ 4 - 74 W 132v“ ‘ am - um % m 24‘3/5‘ ‘55 V/é E $1 13W“ ’5 % \¢‘azs/ 55‘7\ . 72 N “/52: 351 k\\‘ 7% mass 959/ m 6J13$ 760 - % ;\\\\\‘ wuss 8’61 7/4 ' - 5: him“ 863 - m 231%: 8‘¢ --l/51¢ss' 9‘5 - N 131“: 166 VA «25314, 3‘7 13:.va ’— r:'._ “(5236 i“ W I 3119/6 {69 - , 23mm :70 - 1 ‘\ 4/1531; 8'7/ m 3.- ‘ O 772 (:42 $6 JIUS‘Zb 111 V5“ 435614 1324/51. Lil/25“: 54/1326 542/396 4151.1 6 [46253 13/1/56 vizsb 13115-25 uvsu. I432$6 ISUS‘ze 4/2 355 113%: 34115-6 31196 1‘ M13156 3214/45 43/525 &N\w&»-k\‘~\¢; h\~i‘ok"\ ’.v‘va-u ISS'JVS 152.5% III/365‘ Mn 36 11/1536 13:4” /43 5'26 IS‘J?’ 1.6 3 W51: L law’s 1352 $4: IJVnc ludS'o ()2 «(‘5' I2 3 USO SIM/5‘9 N32 5'6 12 «355' 142356 I ZJVS'b 153 V4 1 3 2/1/54 /3 V165“ .\ ‘\kfl\\ ll'l536 l2¢$36 2/5‘4/5 2/34/56 [24356 /23465' a :13 6: 1234/96 4115‘; 110/35 13505; In“: 114/5 :5 1a: 355 wzsssd Nzus' 1.26055 13¢2§b 41/36§ .2le3; 213v“ 3/1VS /¢23§6 1 “flas‘o‘flfiwwmm 0); “Ntiggfiqflo‘ \\ 6% 110 Cedar County ru¢un4uu 3m7namafly4m”u7aa¢mummM97m 1443111 3z1251241.1z4411111111z1zz 1.69669 31941566166 CSLLIL 5r. . ainuuuwma uuuwwuanwflwwmwweuammwmmum t ioquz a “.1 (.4418: [(341 1 :31 % f. 33 mcmiouwwmmw1 mmnmsmflwuuwwwwvyuaawanHw :0 21/31.».9 31 5 41 .0 I; ’14.“ [/3 l/I'Z’ [III II ’4- n»? b 6 z b .u r we: mmmmwmw mmmmmemummmmmmmmmmmimmm wimmmmmmmn ”My“:mmuummwmummmmnmfinw 7.4a I»! V, I I V I $24....“ 3413f/3511fi/321 (42/23/111141414143L21 0b 6 ¢ 6 I ; MW 3EL_W MW r u 1% w k. m Wm a“ u . an .o u" “ “qua whu u,“.fl “fin“ M mwwm u,"~ m m» £13: a u u a. 3 up N M 6 ca mmwwufl u w_nw uanui fl h.uwfl.7 m J‘nu 3 ”m a a. H. 1. Why I mw.z x 4. n 3 2,9‘ m U u 1.4.” .1 an 2 .7 I ”a 2 Ali/u314413r¢414134zl1431444/424144423 ‘ 4 ch a J 4|! . flapmuuuuu“amnxuwmwuuuenwmuwuqumn«u 133 I. .L a, R? 23IIM|W1¢u1u3 abzuaruu :aquzn ”1.12:4. 3:19.” um45w";wmwynummmwmmunnwuuwyamkm \ /.... \\\\ AN J “A“ %% :a%flmm Bum-@9. Dmexmmawwmmfl Auflfi n .2 . .wnu-Innim-n a 9\ Z - .- é Sig-22m WM maaamamzaanmammaaa gala-magna- namgmmaagmaamzaaaa W . . . a 1 m? rowan-DEED 4. 6iwflz 567:.0 Ema-D .....DDDDD ND%%DI§I§S%I%%Z%D Emmanmgumfi 09 lo I. I 111 Cedar County } a 1. “07 A a H A 9W“: I 3"“ V W” 3 at” o h ;} fin”? .13, Id 333 3% 9y” MW” 9 ”L0” 905 33:,oo$ M amt" 3175 1%; or) g! a. NI V N Na. II WHIIII WI flHlN N N N Z%%NDNDD%NNZU %D%%NN%Z%% NNNN%%NZANEIINN . DUDE! NDDDDDDD [1%NUD " \ \ \ %N N %NNNNNNNNNNNDN N 7/. ED NNDDNDQDNQDDUDDUN N DDD% N E N E] 2:22: %UDDWEUNDNDDNDDU ElNWNWNIIWflHIflNflflflIfl ZNNNNQZ 14/36: mm" 42mg #11336 51/32“ #11365“ >1253M kfi/S‘Z‘ IJSI¢6 342375 3 Lam/5'4 / psi/2:" W125" 3 21’63/5 2 10:4. 243/54 1 an“. / rug-3‘ 312/52. 3 Int/ad I ”573‘ 11352,; 2. 14/25; 3 05‘,“ 4/312 54 4 1131!“ 2, @1354 43/245- 4/ 13 «5‘24 / 413564 “16532. I 4/sz 9‘ “9526 any (a 53/24:! 5 “95:; 4/316 6’ 41:25“; 4 2.3/4.1;- vans 4 ”“74; rszvsag 3/2KU 3 #1814 / 123.514 42/349 I} 245/}; .z, “V342 #3525: 4 Mary; l #325“ mm I 01525 / lei/$13 sea/5‘29 4 [3.2456 / III/5’6 4/1635 4 305/6 3 I1 ”5" 43/2451 4 436 2/5 4 $73¥26 .1/36’5'6 2. 31.1 #54, 3 13 #154 911,354 ‘F 211/355 .2. 0346: 34.1154! 3 3192255 3 2319‘; “Q‘s-3 / 21¢35'6 2 311V? mar Z 2.36% :2. M1356 425731. Y 1443294 I 214656 1432‘; I an 5'6 / V1457 2993‘s- .7. 3N1“ 3 9’34 5'“ (.1457; 4 452315 51 4/4319 xmnnm / 253'! 2, want; 1 1.1M.“ 1. 11¢!“ q 5 6 4 ‘f /. ~¢\\\\N\\P\wh\\w\~\-\\~\‘“\\‘%°\§w 2mm (257/36 (2‘13‘; 12 V365 /23$’é§ I239“ 125435 I 24365 IN3S‘6 / 1/4345‘ ’ ’2645 [24:35" [23455 2 Iii/3% ”/5361 12 4365' 13/“5'4 a «3.6% 41/1351. [19’ 365‘ [27365 {15“ 211856 357.2 «6 34/1/65 1024369 3991 ‘5' {16354 113456 IS‘U‘J bV/L 5'13 (23V6 ’ [1’353 2 «7% 21° . 2% I / NNNNE‘Q‘C‘N WMNQQ‘NV qu ”INN “VG‘Q‘QWQB‘ BC. \ \ 112 Cedar County a L figujmqafmy am ”MANOfim. 2/ 2 II /// / tfl 6lgr»d. r a y 6 r6 .5 6 e azuzaz a 3&424 I II 46,...“ 66 L: mauawmamm I I. a. 1. z .1 a. u. 3‘ :‘4‘/‘ I. unmnmnmuu mmumwmmmm 66‘ 2, miff: unnawMumm 2 V\ ,a/// x / V zzN/flNaDDN A %%IE_% EE- DDU%DD%%D 1mggfli Nam? 3?“ Olga ow Kfi7fi O Colfax County Inflafialbnfiril «aioaa44memwn7eflfl.5577uw774m7¢r7mmaf no .AMMONM/4II/l441II41_///./2//l/331////d./ 6U£6§ATA ésoféréfé 6:56 .33 £636 sérmgmmmm”magnum““mmwmmmmnmmmwmmm: gammaawnwmmmmmmonammuwmuwuananwm 1,3 .. Rafim/I/I2I2/4.IId'4/43/I/l/5—azl/ll/Z///// N...Zea...3.2-3341tlé‘3uj womanyaw,2n.wasmannunnasmnzazussrdm‘unw: Elf...v:CZ"wwwmimffiwfiwmmuffm no Nazi:Z3m22:22:32meme 3.1.3”mmw...uwmwmwmmmmmwmmmmmmwmmwm: 21%.“..44/ 4333¥4244¢2 124¢4¢3144zx444¢2 moo .e 6 ¢ .3 e r a .a 5.; .5 r e e .a.» r 5 s Nash; ““9552”... mun «zuugemmnmm«a W¢fa zuzwzuy," \\_..... ....\ N \\ \\\ \\ \\ N... D INUN-II-N%NINNNDN-ms saga-m- onux . %-2l@l§_§-§- Igauaémgfia-Eaagwazz NEED mEDDD%§%QZDDDQUBDDDDDUUJDD // I "“91 aa%% Hafiz-Qafluazz-azg -N%l%%1%% //A // /,/ DNE%; @DDDIl-%IEDDDNDEDEDQQD%DH2 be: was: Mazsgzamzzg 3 7' /¢./u 92,23 4.1%fo 111+ Colfax County 7 6 p i [4118; 4/ 3415/; .3 Inc/5'5 / 113435 .2 /.Z - .om-zy 6 «film 51 I20“ / 32/456 3 It] 7% §\\\\ was! .3 xxx/2:, / M263: / I33“: / E&% ”“45 3- 31”“ 33¢“; / 39/1/45 3 q a N\\\V Mus-6 I tut/6r 3 0%.” / 2/34/51. 2. EDDD% gmNNa V C] “7%- 45' 667 462 463 llS Dakota County «oz—x 7531975 1%??? R $.73: '31 776 I D [I - Elam“; :2 Wis/6] 2. mo... / I239“: / 6 777 g El % @4123“ ¢ 3m“- 3 mm. / mm- 2 lo 77] T: El - (33436 / was. / an“ / I236“ / 6/ 777 E 7% D % E. 5319'“- 6 31255-4; 3 2/34/51, 2 5/3/45 5' /6 710': D 1:! - Day”; é an.“ / I3: / 21.93% 2 /c 71/ § E] E 2% % «42153 4 «5'23“ 4 N12; 3 1243‘s- / ll 711‘: D % D E 2/3451 .2 (Jo’s-26 / mm / ”“3“ ’ 5— 773: D % D - S 21445) «7- 3051, / ’5’35’61 / 2/4365 2 6' 71/N § % %%%4amy 4 zap/5‘26 / fiance / 01135-6 / 7 715.7% N % % Elma/r A an“ 4 v3“): / ”4356 / I2 717 I D D - @4133“ ¢ 3345-5 / («W513 / 143%.;- Z— ,7 77! F152; - - E % HA 5'21; ¢ 2.4/53 15 .2 /23¢.1- / 1mm / i 70 7% g [1% @4021“ 4 my: 1 was: 3 03¢.“ / /0 id] El % E] E % {324156 / 411 3176 4 “’52,. / 2/3156 .2 5’ 707 | E] El 1:] % m 642/53 6 1(er 4 Isa-v“ 3 V1“)! 9‘ /7 7/0 ’ D m WW m 4263/; 4 31/251, / 0:1“ / 33"“5 3 7 7// N § § D .E‘ 23w“ 2. 34015 5 (cm; / Izw‘s‘ / 9 9/3 «V % § E M] § 40st 4 421355 9/ 1:34“ I an.“ / /0 7/6 D % E % Q my“; / 05-y53. I Ian/a- / an.” I V [3| [3 - ® Iirufi / luv.“ / may“ / anus-4 / 9‘ 121' w 1:] - 324551 3 W256: 4 ”293- / N635} / 7 % I: a unis". <4! limits / ‘ 4’2": I may“ / ’7 D 7% Z - S 3mm 3 05966 / ”“361 / 1.957% / é $1.! N‘ E E - S/‘ug‘; / 629623 / ”62¢: / muss / I71 :3 D Q 1:] E w “/325- II 695725 {4 04/512. / /1g;63 / la 2 [:1 [:l- § 3mg, 3 435742 6 354/254 3 2:434/ Z /r/ ;;J [:1 Baa-[:!E§§:E§§:u¢uy JLuGW$zz I LOWS £2 ZWEZfl‘Z 7 __J [:3 223 [:IEE35EZ22unn¢ L3 qufb.3 Aunt / ¢AGAF 9/ 5/ 3 D a D E @ rwso‘ .2 3125-54 3 03¢: / zmlzs 1 f 116 Dixon County T h “g: a “\3 n o m 2: ’ f '3.“ A ‘ a “W o W a 2.119;? a ”$3333; 33%:éezfi 382%? as w W '1.“ 5,311 r11 *1 12‘2”} i a %i‘1“= 33.1“”; °i 3'9 ‘ ' a“ “mm“ °“m“°%“°%'§r“o%m§§® Er m N ® ICE in“ 4 ' I W“ 2 5’ 7,0 % § %% D ”a“, I ”#255 I mans I any / ’r’ 7/; I I I DE @436,” ¢ [3155‘s / (19:35.; I [2.43“ / 7 7011:! z 13% NM 3 mm , mm 2 3 7 7/ 7% % a § I m 3m“ 3 111/3“ .2 (14349 / as“ / 7 7”. I: % Ba -/32«‘¢ I “25736 ¥ 4/3565 4 ZBIV‘S 2- [I 733 [:1 % D [m I ”my 1 314’s“. 3 «25m. / «as» I 7 770 7//, I: ‘95,}: % E ® #03ch 4 (34/252, / r2065“ / 12¢»; / 7 7H w 255;; [j - % 23m“ 1 mm 3 arr/:1 I m 365‘ / 7 742 7% 7% 7% mm“; I 1430‘ / “’15“ / “4"“ ’ ‘/ ‘. . . 3 /0 79/; '3 DD Dawn; 3 my“, / yum; 3 31/1/69 W 742. |:[ a a “a” 5‘ 33,1,“ 3 mes-e / «2.16:; 4 ll 77?- % DEN Snare-e 5/ 0,1,“- / H53“ / l13465' / 7 77 7% Q 3553:: % N\\‘ mag II WI“ / ”WW 1’ ”3"“ ’ v7 774- a 1:. - § mm: 4 245m .7. mam- / (1436: / Y \ 777 D § D- 7% “van 3 I532,“ / 12.51/36 I 13116“ 2 7 77; E %E 4:52” 4 3005* 3 an“ / 23w“ 2. // 77? 555533: a S D a :\\\‘ 41213“- ¢ 0%? / IJZVS'4 I AIS/5‘63 / 7 ill N\\‘ ® W [E 7%; Kw 4,31“. 4 mgzgfizl macs/5'6 I may] I la zxz- 1:! % [III-mm / ”3264 I “1”“ ’ We“ 2 5' {/3 1:] E El E E 53am .6“ «622m 4 3:24“ 3 yaw; 9’ /6 8/61 77/4 C] [:1- S mum 4/ #25736 it 101/6: / as!“ / lo {/5— % g .— _43/265‘ 4 341156 / (2.fo I ll¢563 / 7 {/6 .\\\\j a % 1:] a Egg“; 4 £31526 l/ (45' / 21,6156 .2 // ”f £331.? E S m a |_| sz/‘r 3 W156 / , (9/573 / 42/535 4 7 1771::][::] E:]‘[:]E§§]3§§tqnusz 4! zymur.2 amaze I 13eu3.,l 3’ 710 a C3 % [:1 E @421»:- z/ 321%: 3 "a“ I “’13-“ I 7 acu__1 N ma Elm» 4 mm 3 "W- I ”m I 7 2151::Il::] EEZ [:1E§§[§§§L¢ngz QI nzwgn / ‘anflnr / wuwu5'1' 7 17$ Q S U E .mm 1 mm / "3“ / “a: l .5" 7151—1 El % DE .WSZJG ¥ 36 ‘/ [234‘ I ’25196 I /O 2.7 /////' Q g - ,3”: / we / 0529! / V2436: / 5/ '1 1].? Dixon County " N m 3’ M 759$ ngefi=g§| I: daze/y ‘1’ J/uzs‘b 3 114;“ / an“. / 7 «aus- 1/ 43/52‘ y men; / nun .2 // 4263/5- 1/ zmw- .2 Nu“ l/ "'23“ / // “2/355“ 4/ Jan/or 3 IJVJS' / #12353 / 7 “32,“. 11 mu“.- 3 ”IZ‘JJ / 2/065" 2. lo 33m;- 2, JIJVf‘ 3 3:40.21. 3 Ilélls" / 7 ' “/er .2 wan 9! /d32$’4 I luns‘ / Y ‘ «Jun 6’ 111451 .1 13W.“ / /1W6s / y #2957; 9’ an“ / lJ’IVu- / Iavus' / 7 ans: / rat/1.5" I I349: / [21/131 / 6‘ ‘ 1329'“- / 342“ I 05'2“ / Ange; / ’7‘ «an; 4 “ma 5' ”MW / 1657/3 .1 N 432a: 7‘ 3N2.“ .7 Uvsu / likzss‘ I 9 may; 4 257“: :- ‘Jllfll‘ 3 23/6’5'6 .2. /3 ‘ (297/34 .2 they,- / arm" .2 Ins-u; / 6 [4/053 9‘ 14/3/5216 ‘/ ”£96: .3 2146-3? 1 /J ‘ nut/"f 3146f / ans-o I 113576 / 5‘ an.“ I r7142). 3 'Inw / 43/26 4 9 118 Holt County ‘3 “,1 b A ° (so '1‘“ “ #31,“ “i5 ’33: $23 ’9: ‘a‘i 22% $.23 23% ‘3? ‘3‘“ “‘ éfig‘lF‘fi ‘33.“ “211:3“ — gag-1‘3: ;11“§ $333“; \¢° €3fi“‘ ER mm it? “0“}; /‘/7 #63571 ‘/ 3/415‘6 3 43:16 / ”“35. 7 [:0 #21345 4 34265 / jgszsl / nurse; 7 '20] \ 41’3“" 1/ 3/64’52 3 ”2402, 3 lugs} // 101 I In“ _5’ 25/345 2 215/“ 2. #35}, X 203 5 24,3“,- 4 lie/51., / /.3‘ / 311 V“ 3 [3915.6 / 6 777:) WA - 116 a; 4 ““351 / New: / muse / 7 ?7r 7//4 :\\\\\ - ‘ W 3:26 If 4",“ 6/ “(135-5 I IJVS‘JG / /0 m 7%, N 7% 7/4 _—=; 3m“ 3 We: 2 mm 3 WW I 7 W:— \\ % mum I 15420 / mm. 1 ”“34 ‘ .7. 6 if} - W 413 1g; 4 43/522 9 51 A’s: 36 / ’ 1‘ “5'3 / /o 7f¢ —[ W 1““; 1 Mutts / IBH‘S‘ I [42653 / 5 7’5 - - 77/7 2913/51 1 35/176 3 W352" ‘/ 2’39!“ 7* I I 7Y6 —l 7/71 7% ‘ 13,“,- .1 3/145‘6 3 ““53 / ”4"” I 7 7X7 - 7////1 ~ «“354 ‘/ 4/3525 4 N239; / p.434; I /0 7f! | 7/4 423,5.“ 4 «(any 4 lava. / w m: / I 0 7,7 % % \\\\ I2365¢ I "9"“ I ’ 1"" ’5 I ”‘Wfl' I 4 770 W/fl 7/ / “8/5. 4 425/54, If naus- I I‘Qbfl I /O 97/ I ”/4 ‘ 315/962 3 guy’s-g 3 I531¢6 / [’19’5‘6 I I ?‘7.2 A‘ k‘ 7% 4 3, ,1 z 6‘ 14/519/ .2. awas- I awn, z 3 /o 971 I 7% 7% ‘ 4mg” 4 4/315" 4/ r3924 / Izvsu / ‘ lo W 7/. W ‘ ”416,. / mtg-u. 3 .1525“ I (245-36 / 6 W5- &\ {ff-'2’ \\\V 4/555 4 431/55- 4 V’s.“ y 114556 2 /¢ . ?‘/ 7 I 7% 1y,“ I 3/¢5‘6 1 3 23651 I Ila/265' 4 7 Jr? Knox County 03.23. 0136 Z 0 fiMMoNn I I 9 2:29 L moon.“ I l a: a a film”, W 32.29 2 m u REA-29 3 filial/I 2 822‘ a u n VCmZJW W W M 5.1. a a :29 I fine? 9 2 2 main} u u % km 0 2 n 5.2% 4 4 d, unonn c. nmzilm m mm mm To I 5 2 Na: 6 W m” 126 Madison County at, fill/H- 99““, IJVIS'L I 421356 4 I’m/591., 1143a, / / / / «IV/J _2 UV! 5‘5 I 11 3¢$6 3214 3 ”"57 / 12 was I 1231/91. 14: 53‘ / many / 113‘ 11: / m 55¢, 1.14/5“- 2 I: 3469 / 2153115 1 Inves- 1342:& / 12155; I 113V$L / 2/3u3; \\ 314251. 3 1413519 2 ”1;“- / 12v; “- 25141. 1 .213“;- 1 12 3114; I 123451. 3 m1“ 3 3’1 V“ 3 ’ 13”“ / 1131/51, N12 br / 111/35“ / :1 21/51 3 /13 1165' 2.111151. 1 11435-1. / 1231/51: / 2115‘“ IZVJSe I 1 «.2435 / 123451, I 2131/5: 1341.14; / 1234‘s I ”fl/‘3 I I236$¢ 2134:; 1 1392“ / 1‘14/365 I ”3'49! #61131.- 4 4312.55 ‘/ ’3‘“ 6‘ / 2N“; 134255 / 13¢2sa / £25543 I ’2“3“ ’JVJA: I ”#15“ 2 “3645 I [”625- 821/56 12 be” I 365le 3 “"561 / lf¢136 I [’9’516 / [23(156 / 23/«5‘5 111,356 1 131/5 5'2. / (11:31.2 / 12.4653 22/1154. 1 /36¢15‘ / I293“ I 124/536 «:1 we 4 134:2; I 132 «65‘ I ’ 14943 213941: 1 134516 / 1351126 / 04256 43511.6 4 311/284 3 1‘1"“ 1 35"“ 131V$o 1 13 51,115 I MSW/6 / Izvsx V51 :13 ‘I 1153/21, 4 ’57416 / 3415:: 11115-31. / lav/5‘6 / “54/23 / 12V$63 var 3;; z/ Ail/526 / ”2‘65 / ””563 31055 3 12314.9, / I234“ I ’ 105“ 1’ 36v; .2 134/521. I ’35” 6 / ”5/251, \ O 1.....- “1&V‘u1thaxsqa‘VQ] “‘1“ch ”\VWWoU‘k: \ NP \\\N\\ \\h\ “TNUXV 0‘ 9V‘KB Madison County 127 I 3%? ’52: “a ZWE 3%“? 12:23. " z“ 2 “ 1 n 1"“? afiizS‘. 10"}2‘5 3W1 = “1%: Mm: 3: 131/155- / 114526 I I 113415; I IUI/é" / ’7’ 4312“ 4 1:11.195 / 11 ca 111 3 1112 365' / 9 "’2 "5' I 314'sz 3’ 12:45; / 11‘165' / 9 421536 4 11132.95 4 l3461§ / 1243‘: I I0 41236? 4 13452.1, / 1.121165 / 1.1345: .2 Y 45‘le; 4 13,51“ 1 131/520 / ”Jun! 3 /0 «12;;- 4 131.1552 1 an» / 1L...“ -—— — 'IIJIG If 4/2536 l/ 4/3516 4/ dun/M __ _. 4231s 4 I 34/521, I 134 2% I 14mm — - 21/3159 .2. 14:21.5" / . /3$426 / Mal-ll _ _ 2.314156 1 314135! 3 "’3526 I “It'ld'lu —— -— 913265' 9‘ (3425's I 57361" .5" 2.111553 .2, [1 413:5; 4 Inns-b, / 1532.51 / 213.1,,- 2 Z ' [143:5 I 31.1451; 3 13412 56 I ((1.1): 5 l/ ? 1:11.35 I 213645' 2- 1""le 1 Ines-v / 6 312651! 3 ”swab, I “(1535' / ”3""; / C l 1 1 “5121.13 ' 128 Platte County .1) Jv Way-3 gr fun 9 9 m: ant-M waw‘ a x REE ‘: ”QM“: .°§.°‘ %3“a%3§”§%%§§§o 52/‘15‘6 3 lizvse / 14356 / x2435; / ("“5 I ”"fl’fi / “/5329 / 124/396 / “651/3 4 III/biz / Izuzsa / all“: / 312%: 3 any: / I452“ / mum. / ""154 / nut/cs I 432/5; 4 H42“, / #61135 ‘/ 4/3552 4 av“; / N136; / mm: .2 my“ 3 IZSWJL / I245.“ / 23/452, 2 5/5‘V26 3 usuas / sz‘s' / 124/3“ / 3:4294 3 I423“ / 2/¢;¢,5- ,2 4‘ 2/53 4/ 4523/6 1/ 34/4251. 3 I 2 #365 / «1,;‘5- 1,! [34526 I lit/$36 I 1143“ / guy/s .2 awe: I I351“ / MB“: / 13w“ 2 /25‘4;5 I 104%? l ”4356 / was. 4/ I342“. I ”/1963 I ”“55 / Iquhi / ,VJJS‘ / A134$L / Izaesu / 053,6 4 341,“, 3 “ruse. / A2436; / £1¢365‘ / Isdzsc / ’45236 I 12345; / 43123-6K 4 13/4/55- .2 ”165‘ 'l 3’3”“ 3 , 43,253 4 ”4251, / finch}! "“ I4J$b1 / :1 4/32.; 4 Lawn, / 413516 A! IAN/5w / 3 ways- 4/ 4316;, y [95316 / mus; / 3 13,“ 2 ISM/es" I 114/351; / /255‘4b / : 41¢,sz 4 43/525 51 3/U265' 3 2’4“; '7- ~ 3 243154 2 132645 / 423/51, 4 Q‘s-«g / 3 6431/: 4 I256“ / Insw. / / £451, / Z , WIS/36 1,! 43/526 4 1342‘: / [42351, / :I 4 «32/5 6 r23 «a: I 02 41:4 / /3.z v57, / j ”(33" / IJVISL / $34.16 / I2d3‘; / E. ‘ 2/36.: .2 8524/6 / I236“: / was“, I N339. / Nssze / ”1%.? / ’234/65‘ I ?73 4/52/35 1/ 23w“ .2 may“ / In“; I 775' 341/56 3 Muss 1 “~13“ / 143%; 2 R‘Qfium \ ' “Vhflwwgwmwkm sq V “Q‘W‘QQE‘QOQ 129 Platte County 7c. 2/ 6‘ .9: «w. an 1.] Z 1% um 11 66 A ”m 1 Mn n. S Main. mm x 29mm J n». .F.* Stanton County 130 h r. 1;“;‘39 £2mah‘fi‘8 Qw‘ggm 4 a o 4 * 0 A 3 .g:$§‘ 2:. i o ' " N ' .1 1 ° — :5 1:; O ‘ "'\ m c U z‘z «V% <2_!;F”% 2.0» :31 31%1: a 0 0 O F 5‘ 6'3 0 m C) Q t“ r 6\ 4/135: 4 ”""‘" / ’ W! or / I 141:6 / 7 mus-o 4 man / luvs-a / mm: 3 /o ”1va / 11414.5 / IRIS“ / was. / 4 In)“: 4/ “3’1“ ‘/ ”‘61"! I miss: .1 // [323155 / ’ 13 V34- / Ins-vs / I 105'16 / V Hunt 5- “‘1’3 4 35/6145 3 “my 3 /5‘ 2.135114, 2. Int/re I “h“ l Law/5‘5 / 6 1w 3 re 1 I: 1 we I 1/ W“ 2 14: 355 .2. 7 42/603 4 3mm. 7 1"’”" 1 12,“; 3 /.2. awn; 3 “van / mum / ,zs'ug / 4 aawn 1 lurvs / Int/es / Invas- / 5- #2:“ , 1; In 9’65' I awn. / 0.3 we I 7 3 arm 2 ”’4“ 1 ”"13" / 114/345 / G 2444;; 2 39052: 3 4'93‘1 [j ’ISVJ‘ / /0 m uq/,J _, [Ava] I'd __ Ifivcl'ua _,. ,qul .‘d ._ ._. mun/ad _ IZJUS‘b / 1.15435 2 119055 / _ 46!.523 4/ 1.43/95 2 N155; / 244354, J. 7 ",3“; / 20/55 2 uvsz‘, / 1244,35 / 5- m“; 1 (#3297, / mus-4, / yuan 1 6 4/235; 4 “’1’“ 4 ”3"“ / WI“: 2. (f “\“V' 13ml; 3- .Wz/s'a 3 ”“53 / ’1‘!“ / 7 wusse 4 ,¢1,:‘ / IVszeJ / UJva: .2 7 1134/65 2 now; I 4'15" 4 "‘3‘“ / f am“ 3- 1564/25- I Vane 4 IIUSS'b / J ”use 4 3(69’15' 3 Izua‘: I [41355 / 7 “I,“ 4 1“,”, 1 an.“ 3 211%; .Z /3 3214/6: 3 In“: 3 N531" / ”45“ l i ‘ 31“,; 3 (nus-b ( Izlvs" / lavas-s / 6 '20“. / IZJV$6 / J‘fllfb .3 IUVCb / 6 24/3“ 1 livzsb / law“ I an“ / 5- 13/456 1 3’415‘6 3 143526 / 29735: 2 8 13/V5“ a ’IVI“ 3 [4’526 / 14/5-‘3 2 6 “"35”“ Stanton County 421356 4‘36le iVfl/b ”(265' 41326! 341019 1434.1: ’14.»? 312 «5‘6 4 5431‘ l3¢526 23111.15 134/19’6 m'vah'd _— z/ V563 n um. 524/53/ In dos ”-43 or a V963 I! V56 2 [US$526 316194 nu“! Inn-Jo ill). b 4 I31 V69 A!!!) b #3255 a: V6: In No I: 1“: m1“ 7. I 9:: w. IV‘JS‘I [23456 111111 £11452 [2‘]; ‘6 mm!“ ’52:“. /l‘/5‘5 (23$6¢ 1143 65 luvs: 1143“ 1234/51: [43.925 /1‘/3-9£ /¢/236$‘ #11554 12¢5‘63 IUIIJGS‘ 1143A? / / / / / / / / I “/6235 / 4 / .2 / 12%;: / .2 214‘371 132 Thurston County n I, “2‘ A 3A 7‘ A D 5" ¢ R 1 7» mm m I N °=~ 6* "’- ‘32“? a 2%”: a: 1 msea‘aafi‘a: «33.: “‘ N “1 - ‘El‘fwfi‘g ’3“? 11%2121n21§%°~ 9"- . w %®@°%%o° g mogggfigé 7/7 - - V/fl - ’1- ’19436 / 4/34/45 .2. 136,9; .2 11151:. 4/ 710-- 7% - 135m; 1 13/521» 2. 1151/31, / zmxbs- ,2 71/ . % I \V 7%; - 4/1165 4 nun.» I Izadsl, / Izaues- / 712- . 74 - '7/// Imu- I Issue I rag-1n, I 135W“ / 7‘73 7% % ‘\\\‘ - 56? 42.1155- 4 Iii/$25 4 015“ 3 1134‘s- I ll 7”. V//‘ - = VIII-5'6 Ll 1,4,3. 1 [134‘5‘ I IZVI‘f I i 726' ‘ ‘\\\\ §\\\\V - 7% ‘ 41,“; 1/ ”V“,- I ”4;“ / 124356 / 7 7‘7"- - 17% - _=_ 3. ,‘3 (nun, / 1131/55- I ”1“? I ”3"“ / 4 717” \\\\\ :7/2 5;: " ,7sz I ”/5352 I 2.134“- 1 23/3/57: _2 6 7'25 kfi N $3 - 2% _ Muss / 1324‘; / mean. I wus- 1 5- 72¢/ '77 77 §\V:=: mm / 1 mm 3 "We 1 3 730 - - W - 7/////A ' Muse, 3 13/4155 1 Izslm / Jaw/5' 3 7 73’ V/j, .\\\\‘. g .335 “,5”. ¢ ”4“,— 1 x34“: / 0.4/st / 7 732' % 7% s\\§ m, _ an“ / 01:54, I awn I Izssw / 4 733 - - Vi - % k lugs; / 411156 4 ”"196 I ”"16! I 7 739,- - - ’5' ‘ 46,1; / zwase 1 ”2494 I 121/536 1’ 5’ 735—- - m - é ' ‘ ‘2’“). 4 4351/6 4 IJst-a I an / l0 73‘ I I .x\\\“ .nmn ; 4/6315 4 14m 2 ”we I ""36 / Y 74¢ a m 7‘ g RN“ I [5415-5 ( (zslyg‘ / 21345-4 2 5- 7"— Vfl 7////4 "35513 7%” 94/23; I: 134257» l ”W“ I ”53"" l /0 766 i V/A \\\\\‘ - 3—3 4‘),le 4 5432/5 5’ uni/e I «Wins 3 /3 747 N 7% &\\\\‘ 7/7 7////,47 (01.415; é, was: 2 1:34.14; / mass! / lo 766’ - - 7////' _E fly“ 1 I?U¢Zb / I34526 / ”a“ / 6- 757 N n\\\\‘ .\\\\‘ % //,4 ‘ ‘ 11.1794, / l30l$26 / "(6:23 I luvs; 2 5— 77° 7% - : W253 I W35“ / 11351. I “”96 / 4 77/ - V/A - 11235-0 / 31/4.“ 3 111%“. I “V3“ 1 I7 771 :1 % 7% - '-- may: l 04256 I N’s-oz / 11415: 1 6 773 :I 77; 7.7 .75 , vars-26 4 024% I IN“: I 1’1“? .1 g 774 I - 7% -._=_ 4113.91 4/ 177457 1 541116 5 ”“365 / /l 775‘ I % §\V %E «2:35: ‘I ”“1“ I ”size 3 ”3““ / 7 767 :1 7% % -|m% ‘ «19M, 4- NJZSb / 153462. / my“: I 7 :J E‘ I - - 133 Clay County 7: r -\ ’é‘lemfi’ % N1" air %% 2:1sz a: “fig 321/54. 3 1/346: .2 an“! 2 24135-6 / Y 101356 ¢ “/3361 / I43 in / anus ,2 3 I572.“ / 297 1:5 .2 z/ V36: 1 1:12 1 55’ / 6 ?I‘ ‘ w,“- 6 4/535: 4/ 514/16 5— 4/3265 6‘ /7 3- inn 3 3‘45; / ~st5- / "/2663 / é / «3:65- / II/asz‘ / 142.553 / IZI/S‘J s / 5/ “3,“,- (/ 41/351, 4/ as: u‘ / 4/1356 4 l] ‘ 41,356 51 23/6’5‘6 ,2 3:415: 3 I42“: / /o . 4521/;- 5! H.925" I 1135" 2 2.14355- 2 7 3mm 3 BN5.“ 3 10%: 1 Russ: / 7 ‘ 17/515 3 31491 a 3 J Ins-26 3 1432 65' / /o " #31652. 6‘ I W: S‘b / Na: 5 I 5 24; a; 3 7 ’ 21174.3” 2- I3‘ «.25 / «Ins-16 4 /24 age / Y '1‘ any. / x2 34‘: I 0426; / 1243‘; / ¢ " «an: .2 swczb 3 3/15V6 3 n «my: / 7 1 au 4/: 1 IN: 55 / luv“ / was: / 5‘ ‘ 4542/; ‘/ 453/1. 4 AIM/65 / a ‘ 3w.- / /0 ‘ 3/4/5-1‘ 3 mam 1/ Issue I 2/436: 1 /o ' 4/3615 4 601/96 4 vat/n, .2 41/165 ¢ l¥ 3x2 (1.5" 3 III/256 / 2 nits-5 1 2/ 345's .2 y ' 476:2: 4 11W“ .7. was a / I243 so / g N362; / ”a.“ a / 45v“ / I ’42:: / z/ 623W/ 4 av: 96 / / V6523 / I 1- Vé 35 / 7 ”I,“ 4 #53116 I/ / I/as'cz / 56/3” 5- “z N2“; / any; I mazes / “/3516 / ¢ 1 432657 4 «Vi/1:6 4 I432“ / I 14355 I /0 V2 63/5 1] I N525 / 15V“). / ’ 1“” 6 / 7 Iii] Yankt on County (a E 11!“? .3 ”415‘ I oat/5's I V2365" I L - E 3“”? 3- V/Zis‘b 4 2/4351: 2 Izvas‘e I 7 . 7/4 ”‘6’" 4 ”#942 3 4/6591 1/ 2479/43 .2. I3 :2: 7/4 % .2!!be 2 ‘3/u' 4 571346 5 Il¢36f / [y E «ms-2 x71 nus-3 4/ Inw‘ 1 M5362 / I! - :E: L 1' "e 2 Nbus l ’35“? I “"755 4 7 7% E «(2366‘ / mas o I Ivssze I 32145; 3 C 7/ 7%: 21/455- .2 121/3»- I may“ 2 312641; 3 f ,% ”52‘, I/ 213451: 1 ’5'!sz I Mane I (7 W «1139:. 1 32/4/65- 3’ IN“: 2. lames- / 3' . - E 32/6‘6 3 3‘02“ 3 12.93“ I “W.“ / i . - V// ' r1554; / day’s-4 I 4345. / 24/533 .2 5' "if" 7%4 r' ”an, 5 3mm 3 245/53 ,2 346/52 3 l3 - E 21,“; 2 «vs-53 I 2/345‘6 1 24/83 Z /0 . E an“ I ads-‘3 I 0134/65 I Ins/165‘ / it .' :J 42,“, 4 N29.) I 5/102 5‘ 26/4153 2 I2 3/ ' awn—a 3 4/3155 4/ ”War / Hazel. / 7 3 '5 ‘ awe; / ’23‘74’ / ”’“Z ‘/ ”“3““ / 7 . 3 E «32/52, 5/ Jim-‘2 3 21451.; 1 3/57/62 3 I1 .I § :34 J. ‘ VB“; 4/ an“, / IUVJb I IzIIJr‘ / 7 v :\\\\\‘ . “I”; L. "”96 / 5732:“, 5‘ «13sz I [3 ES: - 4/2155 4 fillet; I III/$36 2 34/151. 3 /o : 421;“ [I (34251. I 11¢!“ I III/25,5- 3 .7 :1: [#1359 / 124/556 I 94,53,5- ¢ lac/In. .2 5' 135 Gratiot County ’5 1x ‘ ”2%“ 133%? R1 31:3 :33 ga 0 m 75 k 0’ h 5‘ m v~ m as 9" «z; :54, AI I3¢sze I 23/451. 2 14/: fl, / 6' 4/359; / N1 963 / 1134/.“ / /23 5-“ / ‘/ IIVJS‘ / /1V6!£‘ / “135‘; / 14/31 ;‘ / 4/ 4/516: {1 W356; l/ 3/4/5‘51 3 l?) W6 / /.2, 40$ 10/“ 1- III/as; / 2/546: _2 452w / é 406 vaizs I Z/H/s“ ,2 Iggy“; I lzu/sé / 5 #07 41/6,: 1,! 64255- / 3.1/4“ 3 21/3/57; .2 l o (’0‘ \ 1,415 u, 4! nus-‘3 .2 ”en: 3 an}; I / 0 40? 7W5“ 3 41/! s: 4 13/5145 .2. as“: ¢ / /0 4/0 _’.-: - ”a“: I ’1 JU‘.‘ I ”(153‘ I 123 ys“ / y 4/! 5?? 4/23“ 4 2W3“ 2. 3/425‘6 3 "039/ 3. II 4/1 4,53“ 4 “"4“ / 2/3946 1 4? “1635‘ .2 ¢ 4/3 New: / 1/1 we 3 145235 I 04151, / é 4/5 3,,, 1“ 3 ZVJ/u' l 421/ ,1, 4/ 23 d/‘S' 2 l / 4/7 ”,1“ fl 314/151 3 zwur 1 My“; / [a ”I? 4“,“. t/ /2‘/65‘3 I 3/601‘ 3 4/3156 4 {1 V20 “/1533 I 2/‘05‘5 1 III/3:6 / IZJVFL / 5- 42', 1’1"“? gm,“ 51 s nus-5 3 11V)“ 1 5 162w 5 / 4/ 422 «1:2,. 5! szs; 3 N615; / 5/2 aw, 5 ,3 42.? 40:2‘ 4 24/963 1 1“] 33—6 .1 21463; 1 /0 42" 310% 3 ’15146 I ’33“? I "4W“ / 6 42: \ u—gau / 1114/94, / mus-4. 3 I: 16;], / 6 42 6 —— ”$5.15 / 2/3“; 2. awn-b 1 so a 1 54 4 ¢ 42 7 1351M .2 I 3256;! I /23v;6 / 1153‘“ ‘1 6 Montcalm County . 136 365' _347 . 349 370 37.2. 373 371/ ll r,/¢)h li-QJAS‘ 1.2365" [(6215- 135406 #26736 inure 136 2 56‘ III?“ Izfl’bs' Jet/s - / I 6! 4 I I / zusfl '2 7 / 4 3 / / I .2. /3¥2.S"6 /5 V2 5‘6 .2 4/3/51, / 94/ as" lafl V9 /3 $1 0’6 «uric I 32¢“ /36 15V 3 W165" 3/2 9’65‘ £24356 IVJZS‘G 139’56 WstzJ 3/ 51 VA IJS'JV6 lliflf¢ l!) 436 415/5? /z$¢36 “#1:; 2/54/36 IJVJa‘b IJS‘IZG IVS?“ I; .2 «5‘6 nus-o 5‘11 365' 24699? {42366 /Z¥35'6 2/69 54/ I 1463? I2 V65"! Lat/35's 0394/6 awe; 2/3455 I23“; AZVIFL Jul/:6 V®¢WVS~§M~QBKVQV¥R 137 Faontinuum ssigned fieadd Arith- SociaI aturil Readin Value Tot in metic Science Science Total 2 "'I"'”"EEF"‘ L 2 10 "'f7 29 9 :%%§F 123586 708 363 2 2 8 6 21 121352 18 1 28 75 113 1% 30 3E 12 9g 1236u5 3 1 u 1 10 123651 1 1 5 9 18 12u365 6 6 12 56 77 12u536 o 1 26 27 S9 1253u6 o 2 3 0 5 125836 696 508 o u 21 8 3h 132u65 10 11 12 5 38 1325h6 2 2 5 o 9 131256 7 82 25 7 121 1u2356 10 7 22 26 65 1 256 6 g2 gg 10 62 1 3 h 7 9 19 39 12u635 1 3 2 21 33 12h653 o 1 1 22 23 12536u o o 2 o 2 125163 1 o 2 h 8 1263h5 3 o 2 3 8 1263Sh o o 1 2 3 126835 1 o 3 2 7 126853 688 122 o o h 6 13 13256u 2 1 2 o 5 132615 0 u 2 o 6 132651 0 o 5 o 5 131265 10 18 - 8 9 hl 138526 h h3 26 2 7S 1352u6 3 5 16. 0 2 135u26 1 u 13 o 1 112365 7 ‘1 3 12 23 1&2536 2 0 h 1 7 1&3265 7 9 h 3 23 1h3526 2 13 21 2 38 152386 0 o 3 1 u 152u36 o .0 o o 0 153286 0 1 g 1 6 153826 2 1 o 11 . m. 5“!“15‘32' - I. -"A 0 2“» 138 A Continuum. ssigned Read~ Arith- Social Natural Readingf Value Total metic Science Science Total 125 h 1256 3 1265h3 13h562 13h625 131652 13526h 135h62 136215 136251 - 136125 672 181 136152 1&2563 1h2635 1&2653 1&3562 1&3625 113652 115236 152361 15326h 153h62 15h236 15h326 162h53 16 251 ‘ 621 1&5263 1&5362 1h6235 Nowmowmmmoommtommwmwmwwmmo 116352 660 53 p. NOOOHHOHOOOOOONONOHOOOHI—‘OOWWNWHHHNONONHHOONOOO£ OOI—‘P—‘OOOOOOHOOHHOWNOHiOOOOHOOOOHH-F’UHONONHNHNOWN-F' oFooooromHOHHHommmmow H [wrwHPHrwmwwwmwwquonmmw«» Readin l 23 151632 156231 156213 156123 161523 165123 continuum Assigned Value Total 'fiead- ins rith- metic Sociaii Science Natural} Science 139 Total 618 80 EOOOOOOO H FHJ *1 and 213516 211356 2 1156 636 117 H H l'-’ 3561 213615 21 651 21 365 2115 6 215 6 215 36 621 172 WWOOOPONHHCDN‘F‘HOOOI—‘OOO 612 86 HOOOOHOHHOOOOOOHNFNHNWHPNOHOHfiFHmNFNOHHH FHA EqfigqfiwmrmHHHm N w O‘l-‘UTO‘O 0U NWONHOIHHOOOFOHNOOONNPOCDUIO‘NOOON-Jl—‘O‘NOOI—‘O FHH HooooowHHHoowrowooHHomrto OONOOO OOOOONOONF’U-Ql—‘UIOl-‘aF’l-JH-F'OONU'll-‘O-P’NU'IWONU‘lNU‘lO‘OOxOOOOOOO 7 .m H HHNNN wmmwmymumu NHWNFHFNHUH 110 Readi 3 211635 213561 213615 213651 215136 215316 251361 251163 253161 251136 251316 261315 261135 261153 Cantinuum F“ saigne Value 600 Total 50 Read- 4%“ Arith- gptic Social Science 0 atural E 0 IS flQME 215163 215361 216135 216153 216315 251613 fiflfil 26 15 588 15 Wmowwwoowmwmowoomoooowwm T ta mrmHHHHomwmmHHr 31 256311 fiflu3 . 265131 flflfié 21156 9% 65 3...: \ONOONOOHHOOHNOOOOI—‘OHOl—‘HUN‘NOOON l-' am 79 “’ <fl¢r 552 101 omodmwmoqwmwpwwrwowow FH4 OONHNOHONNO‘F‘NU OOO-F‘NNOOOOHHU-F‘DJO‘O‘OOOOOOOOI-‘OOOOOOOOOOONI—‘OOOOOO bu» hHA$r fimwuoooHommH NHNNPNNH NH NNU‘U—‘O‘WN ANOOONI—‘OOOOOU'U-‘HUO‘O‘Ol-‘HOOOOOOOHOOIOWOOOOHI—‘OOOOOONN '1» m" m . -m‘."" .“’ 111 Reading Continuumfifijéigned Value Total Read- p. :3 m Arith- metic Social Science Natural Science Total F 32132 325116 325116 311256 2156 H COOP-WM OW 31 562 311625 315162 316125 316152 321561 325161 325161 326115 326151 326115 311265 311526 312165 312516 51216 510 6h knifERhflrdkhq owwtwwwapw Fwd *1562 311625 311652 312561 312615 315126 315216 351162 351126 351216 361125 62151 528 31 5162 316152 351621 351162 516 FHNNHFHHNNWHNNWflOPWW -%§%§Ei 365121 322:1? 312356 113256 1__121356 501 117 OOOOHONOOPOOOHHOOHO#NOHHHHHNHOHHOOOHHM H . _ F’OOOHOOOOOOOOHOOONOHOOWHONHO‘QOI—‘OHOOHWHl-‘U'IN‘F'WHOH WOOOOOOOHOHHOOHNP’OHHHHONOOONOOHOOOOOHHH+AOOOOO H WWOHOHHOOOHOOOOOOOOOONOHflNOWHF—OOOOOOOOHOHONOO :5 um» ONHHHH 112 COntinuum Assigned { Value < 4123152 ,Total Arith- metic “ Social 8 lanes atural cience 8112365 112536 113265 113526 121365 121536 123165 123516 131256 132156 192 167 had ‘112563 112635 113562 113625 113652 115236 115326 121563 121635 121653 123561 123615 123651 125136 2 16 180 105 116235 116253 116325 116352 125163 125361 126135 126153 126315 126351 131562 131625 131652 132561 132615 132651 135126 135216 151326 168 101 NNONVNNHHWPVOHNONNHOF’OHU‘U-‘HNHNWONOCDWUINN‘F’N HVl-F'NOI-‘HOOONHOOOOl-‘OOl-‘OVIOOOOOl—‘WOHOWOHMWOONNWNNMO l-‘OOOOOl-‘l-‘OOOHOOOHHHHWOOOOQOOHOOOOHOOOI—‘OOOHml—‘NWN oooooMoooooomoooomooooooomwmooooooomoooHPHHoto P’ ' #1 firqutmrmwwwomwmwommfiftwmwummmwwmrmr 'mamvfiéh' continuum Resigned 7 Reading Value otal Read- ing Arith- metic Social Science Natural Science Total 152315 152316 153126 216 115623 116523 135261 136125 163152 136215 136251 151362 153261 161235 161253 161325 162135 162153 162315 163125 163152 163215 6 251 156 56 2 621 326521 151623 161523 6 12 WNQQWWF’HNNHHNHHNHNFUIODH 112 156213 156231 165123 165213 165231 165312 13 513126 23116 132 33 * 2163 513261 513162 511326 ~ 531216 32116 13621 120 OOOOOOOOOOOFNNOOU‘INPHOOOP’UNO‘NNWP'HO‘OOl-‘l-‘l-‘HNOOOOHP NOOHOOHENHWOOOHOOOOOOWOOOOOHI—‘OOOOOOOOOOOOl-‘NIOOOO OOHOHOOHOOHOOOI—‘QOOOOOONOOOHOOOOOl—‘OOOOOOOOOOOOO MHHHHijHwHFNQHmwflHHWqu gOHOOOI—‘OOOOOOOOOMI—‘OOOOHOOOOOOPOOOONHOHOOOOOF‘UINIO ._.—2n: b‘mJ'I-‘F— ...' fl‘ .‘."3..I. 111 Cfintinuum ssigned Read- Arith- ocial 1Natural Reading Value ' Total ing, metic Science Science Total 612 511362 108 16 531261 531162 531126 512316 511326 513126 513216 '531621 261 396 2 3 12 i§1321 381 , 6 6 112 315 613215 360 1 621 51 31 613521 611325 623511 623511 318 15 621135 621153 631125 6 2115 21513 621531 625131 632511 631125 336 18 611235 . 612135 612153 , 6 215 3 112 321 3 ‘ 6 21 5512 31 312 2 ' OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOONOHOOOOOHOHOHOWI—‘HOHO OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOQOOOOOOOOOOOO quflrflmtwwHkummwmwmmwmwwmwwpwmwwwwHwHH fl NWOPNNFHHOON%HNHNHONHWHHOOOHOOOHOOOWOH ooHoooooowwoowoooooooooomoooomoooooooo ('3 V1'\ ~ I v 5 K 1 . . , - a— V (‘ x f l:- '-- ‘ h‘ 1 . n u 1“" L 74‘ \ I“ o ,3 . .. .- \- I . -_ . I y L‘ . C 1 \ {‘9 1 W n ’ 5 . v A . 4 .o . 1 ' -\ ., ‘ 'I H‘ -..4 A o P. Q y" Q P! o‘*‘ va‘- \o o '7‘ 1‘» {-1 P 1 1 .' n . ,. o \ '_ l .o)1 . 11., 1‘ ~ 1 . (‘ I |" ,. ‘5 1, , r-’ 3““ PEG .__#_-ffifi 5“, . ~w-— D x; w. (s .4 . f'. "h ,1 ,1 ._ r ‘ VA ‘0 - » 1- ._3. C l . , . . ‘ k u o n .' " . « ‘ 1v ' \ ,. ,. ~ I\ 5’ fix) 0 1 ~ - I! _ ‘ . v 7‘ ‘ 1 I ‘ -. ‘ ‘I a . , - -- 6 _\ « x N \ 1" f o ‘ o r.‘ ..- , "A“ (14.1- ,1 ~ ~ . . -‘ .‘\ r‘ .1 V ‘ ..' » ‘ O J l ‘ " ‘(“ Y ‘ a f ' ' ‘1 ' \ “.\‘ ’ ¢ (x r“- . . ’v '. '- ’ «A - o o . . o - 'p‘ . H C‘ 4- - ‘ '-‘ . , _ ‘ O l\ ~ .r; ' ' 7 ~ 1 c I ' ‘ ' ' r" _ v 0 . - - a . V ‘ » '- . .-, 1“.~ ‘ ‘ , ." - .. l. 1 a ,, 1 w A q - 3 .1 ’ - u \ 1 ‘ "\‘\“\ t A A , I 0 v3 A . . - 7 I . . - . c ‘ A ,_ n ‘ ‘ r1 . ‘ -« ,— . . Q a v . , 1 9 a 4 '- r}, [£2545 ATE ifliullm mummm1[[1119ermm