. IIIIIWI III‘ IIIIII I I' IIIIII I IIIIIIII II III. . . I _. I I III I " ‘ .'\l . l | . ‘ , r (I— II . I I I II 'I I I I I I f 3 I I I ,I I” ‘ “’0' III I . . I . ., .'-' 1 i I ' I I I. g ‘ I I ‘ ' v . I I :E , I I ;‘ g. j. . 'II‘ In”! I ”I - ”Inf! - .“:1;; I I I I ‘ I >- O . .. II “I?! “NIIfl' ‘I . . ‘l . .. t)" fijlj‘” I ' o ux I ‘ I .' §:.7 ‘3} :I: I l ' IJ I 5 ' 2} .7" u ' . ‘. 1 , W M 3 f ‘ ..' ....‘ I: I I 1‘ I” . I . {,D‘ u .11; I II I l ' i ‘ A. '»'. LI LI - =2 x I II ‘ U 1' l I l . I , I I I I II I , .0 $ng I ' -\ I II ‘ I II I . "’ > I ' . 6...?5 ' l III I'“ ' """‘ I."IIIII'III III III IIIII III. IIII‘"II II IIIII IIIIIII’ IIjI‘MI IIII! II'II'II I I II IIIIII III' III III IIIIIIIII IIIII'I' II I III III I III 'III III 'I II ,. IIIIIIIIII II III. 'I “I III III III ‘- .— m - < ' m .m- _ _. ‘ _ “~_ - 327:;7 —._. —-_. II III I I "- ‘ IIIIII :_¢. ffi‘_ _ fl- lI‘II III. IIIIIIIII; l I I II 'II III. III I, ’III I. I“. .m:‘ .. IIIII II'IIIIIIIIIIII IIII'I III’ ”I'IIII'III'I IIE:III'I II fix,“ I‘IIIIIJ. I . "III I! . _. ' IIIII WHIIIII I} {fivII’r IIIIII'III‘ MIN,“ 'i' 1:”. ... ' II«IIIIII”II"III II' IIIIII III' III II III“ 'I 'IIIIIIII’ III' IIIIIII IIIIIIIII I. III I I I5”: '-'.} 31,. III WI IIII IIIIIIII I‘Ij“ IIIIIILI III I III III'III‘I IIIIIII I'IIIIIII‘ III "I I" I ' "I “III III? I III'II I. a; II III IIi I',I IIII-IEIl IIIIIIII‘I’I “IIIIIIIII WW III’II‘I VII III II I “I III; III III'IIIIIIII III III III I If. II'IFIIIII'II.IIIII ”III: "III; (”II II IIIIIIII I I IIIIIILII IIIII III‘IIII'I IIIIII - I I I'I I"I"I‘I(I1‘IIII II III" II'IW“ LIRI' IWIIII‘ III; I" WA!” “I III’. I'II IIIW‘: I'mWIIIIt .,- ‘w'I ‘ L L” III“ .II III: I.I'IIIIII%IJII I 'I. I.’ :III II ' LIKIIIIIIIIII‘II'I‘I' IIIIIIIIIII'AIIIIIII . flII IIII IWIIIII ”'III IIIIIIIII'III a : Micki Scam Unigagsity . 0E5“ This is to certify that the thesis entitled CHANGES IN TOTAL SERUM CHOLESTEROL IN RESPONSE TO A DECREASE IN DIETARY CHOLESTEROL AND MODIFICATION OF THE AMOUNT AND TYPE OF DIETARY FAT: A CONTROLLED DIETARY STUDY presented by D. Margaret Ullmann has been accepted towards fulfillment of the requirements for M. S. degree in Nutrigign Date 2/19/80 0-7839 OVERDUE FINE§z 25¢ per do per it. RETUMIIG LIBRARY MATERIALS: Place in book return to remove chum fro- circulation records CHANGES IN TOTAL SERUM CHOLESTEROL IN RESPONSE TO A DECREASE IN DIETARY CHOLESTEROL AND MODIFICATION OF THE AMOUNT AND TYPE OF DIETARY FAT: A CONTROLLED DIETARY STUDY By D. Margaret Ullmann A THESIS Submitted to Michigan State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE Department of Food Science and Human Nutrition 1979 ABSTRACT CHANGES IN TOTAL SERUM CHOLESTEROL IN RESPONSE TO A DECREASE IN DIETARY CHOLESTEROL AND MODIFICATION OF THE AMOUNT AND TYPE OF DIETARY FAT: A CONTROLLED DIETARY STUDY By D. Margaret Ullmann Thirty-two healthy men (mean age = 24.8 years) were fed a control diet containing 42 to 45% of total calories from fat, a P/S ratio of 0.3 to 0.5, and two eggs/day for ten days. During the next eight weeks, 16 subjects received each of the following diets for four weeks in a crossover design: (l) Diet C-E, the control diet (with two eggs/day or (2) Diet C-ES, the control diet with eggs replaced by a cholesterol-free egg substitute. The remaining 16 subjects received each of the following diets in a similar crossover design: (l) Diet MF-E, a modified fat diet containing 35% of total calories from fat, a P/S ratio 21.0, and two eggs/day or (2) Diet MF-ES, the modified fat diet with eggs replaced by a cholesterol-free egg substitute. Diets for each subject were adjusted to maintain body weight. Average serum cholesterol values during the control period ranged from 195 to 288 mg/lOO ml. A change from the control period to the modified fat diet produced a decrease in serum cholesterol concentration in 15 of the 16 subjects. In addition, comparison of the mean serum cholesterol con- centrations during the control period with average weekly D. Margaret Ullmann serum cholesterol values during the experimental diet periods showed a statistically significant decrease (p<0.5) when subjects consumed egg substitute versus two eggs/day. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I wish to express my sincere appreciation to the many people who helped to make this study possible. To: Esperanza Briones for her assistance in menu planning and daily diet modification calculations. Shirley Ann Mellen and Patricia Smith Brown for their assistance in performing the laboratory analyses. Dr. Charles Rhoades for the time he contributed generously in serving as the physician for the study. Dr. J. Gill for statistical advice and assistance. The men who participated as subjects in the study for their cooperation and compliance. The members of my thesis committee - Dr. Jenny Bond, Dr. Gilbert Leveille, and Dr. David Rovner for their expertise in research and thesis development. Dr. Wanda Chenoweth, my major professor, for her guidance, expertise, patience, kindness, criticism, and words of encouragement. I wish to express gratitude to Standard Brands, Inc., for their support of this project, and particularly to Dr. Ron Simpson. And last, but not least, I would like to acknowledge my father, Alexander Ullmann, my sister, Sabrina, and my friends for their love and support throughout my graduate school career. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES. LIST OF FIGURES INTRODUCTION. REVIEW OF LITERATURE. Historical Approach. Dietary Cholesterol. . Compensatory mechanisms for serum choles- terol homeostasis. Dietary Fat. . . . Level of dietary fat . . . Degree of saturation of fat. Chain length of fatty acids. . Proposed mechanisms for cholesterol lowering effect of polyunsaturated fats Summary. . . METHODS AND PROCEDURES. Subject Recruitment. Screening Procedures Subject Characteristics. Orientation. . Informed Consent . . Experimental Diet Plan Menus. Meals. . Food Preparation . . Food Intake Records. Blood Tests. Statistical Design RESULTS . Body Weights Nutrient Intake. . . Total Serum Cholesterol. DISCUSSION. The Design of the Study. Subject Selection. Subject Compliance . Body Weight. . Alcohol Consumption. . Changes in Serum Cholesterol CONCLUSIONS . SUGGESTIONS FOR FURTHER RESEARCH. APPENDICES. LIST OF REFERENCES. iv 106 LIST OF TABLES Table Page 1 Summary table of subject characteristics. . . . 35 2 Experimental diet plan. . . . . . . . . . . . . 40 3 Comparison of the nutrient composition of two large whole eggs and an equivalent serving portion of the cholesterol-free egg substitute used in this study. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43 4 Schedule of blood tests . . . . . . . . . . . . 48 5 Average chan e in body weight within the con- trol period weeks 1-2) and each of the experi- mental diet periods (weeks 4-6, 7-10) . . . . . 51 6 Dietary intake of protein, fat and cholesterol. 54 7 Concentration of total serum cholesterol and percentage change in subjects who continued on the control diet with 2 eggs/day during the first 4-week experimental diet period, followed by egg substitute during the last 4-week experimental diet period. . . . . . . . . . . . 57 8 Concentration of total serum cholesterol and percentage change in subjects who consumed the control diet with egg substitute during the first 4-week experimental diet period, followed by eggs during the last 4-week experimental diet period . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 58 9 Concentration of total serum cholesterol and percentage change in subjects who consumed the modified fat diet with 2 eggs/day during the first 4- week experimental diet period, followed by egg substitute during the last 4- week experimental diet period. . . . . . . 59 Table Page lO Concentration of total serum cholesterol and percentage change in subjects who consumed the modified fat diet with egg substitute during the first 4- week experimental diet period, followed by eggs during the last 4- week experimental diet period. . . . . . . . . 60 ll Analysis of variance of the data for total serum cholesterol . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 67 vi LIST OF FIGURES Figure Page l Changes in total serum cholesterol (mg/lOO ml) during each experimental diet period relative to the control period for each of the four diet groups. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 65 vii INTRODUCTION Coronary heart disease (CHD) is the major cause of death in the United States today (Gotto, l979). There is much documentation in the literature of an association between high serum cholesterol concentration and athero- sclerosis (Keys, 1970; Kannel et al., l97l; Carlson and Bottiger, l972). Epidemiological studies consistently have shown higher serum cholesterol levels and a higher incidence of CHD among p0pulations consuming diets high in cholesterol and fats, particularly saturated fats (Jolliffe and Archer, l959; Keys, 1970). Although the etiology of CHD is known to be multifactorial, elevated levels of blood cholesterol have been identified as a major risk factor in the devel- opment of the disease (Connor and Connor, 1972). Numerous studies in experimental animals and humans have demonstrated a direct influence of diet on serum cholesterol concentra- tions. Although the studies reported in the literature fail to provide incontrovertible evidence of a causal rela- tionship of serum cholesterol concentration to CH0, collec- tively they support the theory that dietary manipulations designed to lower serum cholesterol concentrations may be effective in reducing the risk of CHD. The effects of dietary cholesterol and fats on serum cholesterol concentration have been studied extensively in humans using formula diets as well as diets containing natural foods; the effects of each have been studied inde— pendently as well as together. There is general consensus among researchers that reduced intake of saturated fat, increased intake of polyunsaturated fat, and a decrease in total dietary fat will reduce serum cholesterol concentra- tion. There is, however, much controversy regarding the extent to which an increase or decrease in dietary choles- terol may alter serum cholesterol concentration in man. Recently several studies have been reported indicating that healthy subjects show no change in serum cholesterol in response to ingestion of cholesterol in amounts equiva- lent to one or two eggs/day (Slater et al., 1976; Porter et al., 1976). Kummerow et a1. (1977) and Flynn et a1. (1979) reported similar findings. Although the results of these studies suggest that consumption of egg cholesterol in regular meals does not significantly increase plasma or serum cholesterol in man it would seem inappropriate to conclude from them that changes in dietary cholesterol have no effect upon serum cholesterol. The intake of foods other than eggs by these subjects was not controlled. It is possible that variation in cholesterol intake from foods other than eggs or variations in the amount or type of fat may have been sufficient to mask the effect of the amount of cholesterol provided by one or two eggs/day. In the experiment described herein, the effects of the restriction of dietary cholesterol and modification of amount and type of fat on serum cholesterol were studied in free-living adult male subjects whose serum cholesterol levels were in the upper normal range. This population group was selected because of the belief that young men with moderately elevated serum cholesterol levels would be likely to benefit from preventive dietary measures designed to lower serum cholesterol levels. During the winter and spring of 1978 a two-part con- trolled human feeding study was conducted at Michigan State University to determine the effect on total serum choles- terol of 1) replacing two eggs/day in a "typical" American diet with a cholesterol-free egg substitute. 2) feeding a modified fat diet containing either two eggs/day or an egg substitute. The major difference between the present study and the previous experiments of the effects on serum cholesterol of adding or deleting one or two eggs/day to the diets of young men in a free-living population is the degree of control over food intake. REVIEW OF LITERATURE Historical Approach The discovery over a century ago that cholesterol is a prominent constituent of atherosclerotic plaque (Vogel, 1847) and that this same substance is also present in the blood has stimulated interest in pursuing a better under- standing of the interrelationship between diet, serum cholesterol, atherogenesis and coronary heart disease (CHO). Although it constitutes only a small fraction of total body cholesterol, plasma cholesterol is the only pool of cholesterol incriminated in CHD (Sodhi and Mason, 1977). Initially it was thought that the lipid deposits found within the atheromatous arteries were produced by local synthesis within the arterial walls. It has been demonstrated conclusively, however, through the use of radio-labelled cholesterol that cholesterol from the blood stream does enter into the intimal atheromas and that much of the labelled cholesterol recovered from the athero- sclerotic plaque was that which was fed in the diet (Chobanian and Hollander, 1962; Connor and Jackson, 1963). It has been shown that hypercholesterolemia induced in a variety of ways results in the development of atherosclerotic lesions in a number of animal species. Anitschkow (1933) produced hypercholesterolemia and the characteristic lesions in the aorta and coronary arteries in rabbits by feeding them 0.5% cholesterol dissolved in highly unsaturated sunflower seed oil. Other investigators have shown that the feeding of a cholesterol-vegetable oil mixture or foods rich in cholesterol and fat induced hypercholesterolemia and atherosclerosis in the guinea pig, chicken, rat, hypothyroid dog, pig and monkey (Katz et al., 1958). Much criticism has been generated about the appli- cability of the results from animal studies to humans because of the inherent differences in the susceptibility of various animals to CH0 and because of the differences in their serum lipid responses to dietary modifications. Frequently the level of cholesterol fed in animal studies was enormously high in comparison with levels normally consumed by humans. Cholesterol levels in the diet fed to induce atherosclerosis in animals tend to range from 0.5 to 5.0% by weight of dry food, which would be equiva- lent to feeding 1000 to 10,000 mg of cholesterol/1000 kcal daily (Keys, 1952). Several longitudina1,prospective studies have demon- strated in a variety of population samples that risk of CHD was directly related to the antecedent serum cholesterol levels (Keys et al., 1963; Chapman and Massey, 1964; Rosenman et al., 1970; Carlson and Bottiger, 1972). Data from the Framingham study (Kannel et al., 1971) revealed a distinct and Striking increment in the risk of CHD pro- portional to the antecedent serum cholesterol concentration. These data showed that serum cholesterol levels of 260 mg/ 100 ml or more resulted in a five-times greater incidence of CHD than a level below 200 mg/100 ml in men aged 30-49 years, and that plasma cholesterol concentration was pre- dictive of risk in the development of heart disease. Indirect evidence linking atherosclerosis to serum choles- terol concentration is found in the diseases that are associated with both hypercholesterolemia and premature atherosclerosis, such as diabetes mellitus, nephrosis, and hypothyroidism. Persons with inborn errors of cholesterol metabolism, such as familial hypercholesterolemia and hypercholesterolemia xanthomas, are particularly susceptible to early development of atherosclerotic disease (Stanbury et al., 1972). A parallel relationship also has been shown between the age trend in serum cholesterol concentrations and the age trend in development of atherosclerosis (Keys, 1952). The theory that diet has a powerful effect on serum cholesterol concentration and on the incidence of CHD has been supported by convincing evidence from several world- wide epidemiologic studies (Keys et al., 1957a;Jolliffe and Archer, 1959; Toor et al., 1960; Connor and Connor, 1972) which revealed a strong relationship between populations consuming diets containing large quantities of animal products and a high incidence of CHD. As early as 1916 De Langen reported that plasma cholesterol levels in healthy Javanese men were much lower than in the Nether- lands, France, or Germany. He observed that CHD was rare among the Javanese population and suggested that this was because their diet was low in cholesterol and other lipids. Toor et a1. (1960) reported that Israeli immigrants from Yemen had much lower serum cholesterol levels and were far less prone to CH0 than either the eastern European Israeli immigrants who consumed diets that were much higher in dietary fat and cholesterol, or the Yemenites who had immigrated to Israel earlier and had already adopted a higher fat diet. Keys (1970) studied 18 population samples of 40-59 year old men from seven different countries and found that serum cholesterol levels correlated with the consumption of cholesterol and saturated fat and with the incidence of CHD. He concluded that 80% of the serum cho- lesterol variability among these groups could be explained by differences in the diet. Other lines of epidemiological evidence linking diet to CHO include the effects of wartime privations (Helwig et al., 1952), geographic migrations (Toor et al., 1960), and social class differences (Logan, 1952), all of which are known to have profound effects on dietary patterns. That the differences in the incidence of CHD seen in the various population groups studied epidemiologically were not simply racial or genetic variables has been demon- strated in migrants of the same race who changed from a low to a high cholesterol-high fat diet and experienced a corresponding change in their serum cholesterol levels together with a change in their propensity to CHO (Keys et al., 1958). This point is clearly illustrated in a study by Toor et a1. (1960) who showed that Yemenites gradu- ally 1ost their relative protection from CHD as they adopted the dietary pattern of European Jews. Similarly, De Langen (1916) observed the Javanese stewards on Dutch passenger ships who ate Dutch food developed similar blood cholesterol levels to the Dutchmen and developed a higher incidence of CHD. Bersohn and Wayburne (1956) also provided evidence in support of the claim that serum cholesterol concentration is dependent upon the composition of the diet and is not the result of racial or genetic differences. They demonstrated that the cholesterol concentration of blood drawn from the umbilical cord of newborn infants of different populations throughout the world showed no dissimilarity due to race or class and was about 80 mg/ 100 m1. Epidemiologic studies have made it possible to survey the effects of many different types of diets on serum cho— lesterol levels in relatively large population samples. The use of epidemiologic evidence, however, is often belittled because of the arguments that (1) mortality and CHO are influenced by a lifelong exposure to diet while data of this kind often reflect dietary habits over a relatively short period of time, (2) the changes in dietary patterns are usually accompanied by changes in lifestyle and environmental factors, such as stress, level of exer- cise, calorie intake, smoking habits, sanitation and the incidence of other diseases, and (3) food consumption data are often unreliable in terms of describing individual food consumption. Although there is much documentation in the literature of an association between high plasma cholesterol levels and atherosclerosis, an etiologic association is more dif- ficult to prove. An association is considered likely to be "causal" if it a) is a consistently strong association and b) precedes the disease by an appropriate period of time. Serum cholesterol concentration meets both of these criteria for causality. Although causality has yet to be proven, it is evident that plasma cholesterol plays a sig- nificant, albeit, undefined role in the development of CHD and atherosclerosis. Dietary Cholesterol Extensive research has been conducted over the past half-century in the hope of defining the relationship of dietary cholesterol to serum levels in man. The results 10 of many of the studies have yielded conflicting, question- able, and often inconclusive data (Ahrens, 1976). Instead of providing answers, the results of these studies have generated more confusion and controversy. The effect of added cholesterol has been studied using formula diets (Kinsell et al., 1952; Beveridge et a1. 1960; Erickson et al., 1964; Mattson et al., 1972). Diets containing conventional foods also have been used to study the effects of dietary cholesterol on serum cholesterol concentrations (Messinger et al., 1950; Connor et al., 1964; Grande et al., 1965; Anderson et al., 1976). In some experiments comparisons were made between nearly choles- terol-free diets and diets containing very large quantities of cholesterol (Beveridge et al., 1960; Connor et al., 1961). Purified cholesterol was added to the diet in some studies (Kinsell et al., 1952; Beveridge et al., 1960) while in others frozen egg yolk or whole fresh eggs were used (Messinger et al., 1950; Hegsted et al., 1965; Kummerow et al., 1977). Studies also varied in length of dietary periods from 8 days (Beveridge et al., 1960) to 3 months (Porter et al., 1977). In addition, some studies were conducted under strictly controlled conditions (Connor et al., 1964; Mattson et al., 1972) whereas in others the subjects were asked only to keep food records (Hildreth et al., 1951; Shorey et al., 1974; Porter et al., 1977; Simons et al., 1978). Furthermore, some studies were 11 conducted using healthy subjects (Hegsted et al., 1965; Slater et al., 1976) while others used hypercholesterolemic and convalescent patients (Steiner et al., 1962; Kummerow et al., 1977). This tremendous variation in experimental design has made interpretation of the often contradictory results nearly impossible. The results of a number of human studies conducted in the 1950's led several investigators (Keys et al., 1955; 1956; Kinsell et al., 1952; Ahrens et al., 1957) to conclude that restriction of dietary cholesterol was unnecessary and unwarranted because its ingestion failed to alter significantly serum cholesterol levels in man. These investigators believed that the relative homeostasis of serum cholesterol concentration was maintained despite even large increases in cholesterol intake because of negative feedback on cholesterol synthesis in the body. This conclusion was reached by each investigator after feeding crystalline cholesterol in the amounts of 0.5 to 60 gm in special formula diets under strict metabolic conditions. The results of these studies are in agreement with a report from an earlier study (Steiner and Domanski, 1941) in which 10 gm of crystalline cholesterol in 400 cc of milk added to the daily diet of a group of patients for six weeks failed to induce significant elevations in serum cholesterol levels. In a later study, however, Steiner et al. (1962) discovered that the addition of 3 gm of 12 crystalline cholesterol to a cholesterol-free formula diet containing 95 gm of fat produced a significant elevation in serum cholesterol concentration in a group of hospital- ized men and women. Beveridge et a1. (1960) demonstrated an increase in serum cholesterol when supplements of highly purified cholesterol in the amounts of 0-1600 mg/950 kcal were added to a fat-free formula diet for a period of 8 days following an 8-day period in which a cholesterol- free, fat-free formula diet was fed. The results of this study have received much criticism because of the lack of fat in the diet, which is known to be essential for choles- terol absorption (Keys et al., 1965b). Experiments designed to study the effects of added cholesterol in the form of egg yolk and egg yolk powder similarly produced conflicting results. Messinger et a1. (1950) reported that the addition of 150 gm of egg yolk powder produced a significant increase in serum cholesterol concentration. Mattson et a1. (1972) utilized a formula diet to which various levels of dry egg yolk cholesterol were added. They reported a linear increase in plasma cholesterol within the range of 0 to 317 mg cholesterol/ 1000 kcal. Connor et a1. (1961) tested the effects of adding either egg yolk cholesterol or crystalline choles- terol to formula diets at various levels and found that egg yolk powder produced greater serum cholesterol elevations than did much larger amounts of purified cholesterol, with 13 or without added fat. Hegsted et a1. (1965) similarly showed that addition of egg yolk powder to a diet of ordi- nary foods under metabolic conditions produced a signifi- cant increase in serum cholesterol levels. Mayer et a1. (1954), in contrast, found that the addition of approxi- mately 800 mg of cholesterol/day in the form of egg yolk to a diet low in fat and low in cholesterol produced no demonstrablewchange in plasma cholesterol levels of five healthy male subjects after a period of one week. A lack of serum cholesterol response to increased intake of egg yolk cholesterol was also reported by Keys et a1. (1950), who concluded that the serum cholesterol intake of "normal" men is not significantly related to differences in the habitual cholesterol intake over a range of approximately 250-800 mg/day. Interpretation of many of the early studies in which egg yolk was used as the source of dietary cholesterol is complicated by the fact that the addition of egg yolk also increased the fat content of the diet. The addition of 150 gm of egg yolk powder, for example, would add approxi- mately 95 gm of fat/day to the diet (Mayer et al., 1954). Several investigators have studied the effects of vari- ous levels of dietary cholesterol added to formula and conven- tional foods diets under strictly controlled conditions in an attempt to describe the relationship of dietary cholesterol to serum cholesterol concentration over a wide 14 range of intake. From the results of a series of experi- ments covering a two year period in which schizophrenic patients were fed a natural foods diet to which egg yolk cholesterol was added in amounts ranging from 100-700 mg/ day, Hegsted et a1. (1965) concluded that serum cholesterol was linearly related to dietary cholesterol. They predicted that an increase of 100 mg of cholesterol would produce a rise in serum cholesterol of approximately 5 mg/100 ml. Similar results were reported by Mattson et al. (1972) who compared the serum cholesterol response of four groups of prisoners to the change from zero dietary cholesterol to 106, 212, 317 mg of egg yolk cholesterol/1000 kcal/day. They concluded that the changes in serum cholesterol were essentially linearly related to intake and were approximately 12 mg for each '100 mg cholesterol/1000 kcal. Keys and Parlin (1966), in contrast, found that serum and dietary cholesterol were not linearly related, but that the change in serum cholesterol was proportional to the square root of cholesterol intake. These conclusions were based on the results of a series of studies in which schizophrenic patients were fed a natural foods diet con- taining cholesterol supplements ranging from 125-540 mg/ 1000 kcal. When the results from this study were analyzed together with those by four other investigators the follow— ing prediction formula was derived: ACholesterol (mg/100 ml) = 1.5 (Z2 - Z1) 15 where Z is equal to the square root of dietary cholesterol measured as mg/lOOO kcal. Keys and Parlin emphasized that this equation applies to groups of people and not to indi- vidual subjects. Several investigators have reported that once a certain level of dietary cholesterol was reached, further increments in intake had little additional effect on serum cholesterol concentration. Beveridge et a1. (1960) reported finding good correlation between serum cholesterol concentrations and dietary increments of cholesterol up to intakes of approximately 650 mg/day; dietary cholesterol beyond that level failed to produce additional increases in serum cholesterol. In a similar study Connor et a1. (1964) found that the addition of 475 mg cholesterol/day to the diet produced a significant increase in serum cholesterol, but intakes of twice that amount did not cause a greater increase in serum cholesterol. The results of several recent studies on the effects of added cholesterol in amounts normally consumed in the American diet disagree with the findings of Hegsted et a1. (1965), Mattson et a1. (1972) and Keys and Parlin (1966). In a study by Slater et a1. (1976) three groups of young and middle aged men in free-living populations were asked to eat one or two eggs/day in addition to their usual diets, or to eliminate all eggs. No significant changes in the plasma cholesterol values were observed after the 16 6-8 week periodson extra eggs compared to periods in which eggs were absent from the diet. Porter et a1. (1977) and Flynn et a1. (1979) similarly failed to find a significant association between dietary and serum cholesterol levels with the addition or elimination of one egg daily in the customary diets of healthy male subjects. In another study Kummerow et a1. (1977) studied the effects of adding two whole fresh eggs incorporated into either a custard or a milk shake to the diets of hospitalized men and women in three separate hospitals. No significant change in serum cholesterol concentration was found in the majority of patients after 54 days of continued consumption of two eggs/day. Although statistical analyses of the data reported by these investigators support the conclusion that dietary cholesterol in amounts equal to two eggs/day does not sig- nificantly influence serum cholesterol concentration, examination of the data for individual subjects revealed a marked variation in individual response of plasma choles- terol to dietary cholesterol challenges in man. It has been shown that some subjects may not show any change; some others may even demonstrate a decrease in their plasma cholesterol when dietary cholesterol is increased (Quintao et al., 1971; Nestel and Poyser, 1976). It has been suggested that the variability in responsiveness of plasma cholesterol to changes in the diet that is shown 17 to exist among individuals consuming the same diet may reflect changes in other dietary components that necessarily accompany the adjustment of the diet to meet individual needs. Another possible explanation for differences in responsiveness is the existence of genetically determined compensatory mechanisms. Unlike many animals such as the monkey and the rabbit, which may develop serum cholesterol levels of 600-2000 mg/ 100 ml following a high cholesterol diet, ingestion of very large quantities by man results in a much smaller increase in serum cholesterol concentration (Connor et al., 1961, 1964). Even when cholesterol intake exceeds the normal turnover rate in man, the rise in serum cholesterol almost never exceeds 100 mg/100 ml (Steiner et al., 1962). Despite the extensive research conducted in the area of cholesterol metabolism over the last few decades, the mechanisms res- ponsible for the relative homeostasis of plasma cholesterol in man have not been clearly defined (Sodhi and Mason, 1977). It is believed that total body cholesterol is regu- lated by a complex, dynamic interplay between absorption, synthesis and excretion. The following compensatory mecha- nisms have been proposed to account for this homeostatic phenomenon: 1) Limited absorption of dietary cholesterol. In a recent study, Connor and Lin (1974) demonstrated that the amount of cholesterol absorbed was roughly linear for 18 different quantities of dietary cholesterol between 110 and 610 mg and that the percentage absorption of cholesterol remained relatively constant at 45% despite the increased intake. Wilson and Lindsey (1965) discovered a maximum daily absorption of approximately 300 mg when 3 g of cholesterol wenafed and they concluded that the human intestine has a limited ability to absorb dietary choles- terol. Quintao et a1. (1971), on the other hand, demon- strated that absorption is proportional to the amount ingested and that much greater amounts can be absorbed if the intake is high enough. At intakes up to 1 g/day, about half is absorbed; at higher intakes the percent absorbed becomes less. Several factors are known to limit cholesterol absorp- tion. The requirement for exogenous fat to assist the absorption of dietary cholesterol has been clearly demon- strated (Keys et al., 1965b). Quintao et a1. (1971) have shown that the proportion of a large single dose of choles- terol that may be absorbed depends upon the previous intake of cholesterol. When cholesterol intake has been low, a larger fraction of any single dose is absorbed than when the intake has been high. This finding suggests a possible role of the degree of saturation of the intestinal mucosa in controlling absorption of dietary cholesterol. It also has been demonstrated that the amount of absorption varies with the source of dietary cholesterol, with egg yolk 19 cholesterol being more effectively absorbed than crystal- line cholesterol (Cook et al., 1956; Connor et al., 1961). 2) Inhibition of cholesterol biosynthesis. Isotopic studies in man under steady state conditions have shown that biosynthesis of cholesterol in the liver remains relatively constant and that cholesterol biosynthesis is not usually altered by various quantities of dietary cho- lesterol. Wilson and Lindsey(l965) using a double isotopic steady state technique showed that dietary cholesterol, whether fed in the form of eggs or in a purified state, had little effect on the total rate of endogenous choles- terol synthesis. Quintao et al. (1971), on the other hand, found that increased absorption of cholesterol resulted in a decrease in total body synthesis in five of six patients; however, the amount of suppression in synthesis was extremely variable from person to person. 3) Increased excretion of acidic sterols. Although balance studies carried out in rats by Wilson (1964) indicated that a significant amount of absorbed dietary cholesterol was excreted through the enhanced formation of bile acids, enhanced absorption of dietary cholesterol has not been shown to produce a significant increase in excretion of acidic sterols in man (Quintao et al., 1971). They have shown, however, an increased excretion of endo- genous neutral sterols with cholesterol feeding which may have been due to inhibition in reabsorption of endogenous 20 cholesterol by exogenous cholesterol. Dietary Fat The effects of dietary fat on blood cholesterol con- centration and its relationship to CHO have been studied extensively in experimental animals and in epidemiological, clinical, and pathological studies in humans using a three- pronged approach: (1) level of dietary fat, (2) degree of saturation of fatty acids, (3) the chain length of the fatty acids in dietary triglycerides. Level of dietary fat. It has been nearly a quarter of a century since Keys et a1. (1955) demonstrated a statisti- cally significant relationship between death rate from CHO, plasma cholesterol, and the proportion of total calories derived from fat. Keys (1952, 1970) and Jolliffe and Archer (1959) have shown that in those countries where death rate from CHO is low, the p0pulations exhibit low serum choles- terol levels and tend to consume less fat than population groups with a higher incidence of CHD. Although the conclusions from epidemiological studies have generally supported the theory that a change in the level of consumption of dietary fat would produce a concom- mitant change in serum cholesterol concentration, this has not been consistently demonstrated in controlled human studies. From the results of a study in which groups of schizophrenic patients were fed low-fat diets to which 21 various test oils were added, Hegsted et a1. (1965) reported that the amount of dietary fat, tested at levels equal to 22 to 40 percent of total calories, appeared to be without influence on the level of serum cholesterol. They found no effect on serum cholesterol when various levels of dif- ferent fats were tested, as long as a constant polyunsatu- rated:saturated (P/S) fat ratio was maintained. Similar results were attained by Grande et a1. (1972) which showed that varying the amount of fat had no effect on serum cholesterol when the composition of dietary fat was such that 2 S- P = 0, where S and P represent, respectively, the percent of total calories from saturated and polyun- saturated fatty acids. Keys et a1. (1950), Hildreth et a1. (1951) and Mayer et a1. (1954), on the other hand, reported that an increase in dietary fat, whether of animal or vegetable origin, led uniformly to higher plasma choles— terol levels. Other investigators (Kinsell et al., 1953; Ahrens et al., 1954: Beveridge et al., 1955) reported increased plasma cholesterol levels following increased intakes of animal fat; similar amounts of vegetable fat, however, produced decreases in serum cholesterol levels. Malmros and Wigand (1957) found, in contrast, no essential difference between vegetable and animal fat. Most of the vegetable oils that they studied produced cholesterol- depressing effects, but coconut oil did not. Milk fat was shown to raise serum cholesterol, but whale oil depressed 22 it. They concluded that the cholesterol depressing effect of some of the oils was due to their unsaturated fatty acids. Additional evidence refuting the idea that the level of dietary fat is important irrespective of source is supplied by Hardinge et a1. (1962), who demonstrated that strict vegetarians exhibited lower serum cholesterol levels than either lacto-ovo-vegetarians or non-vegetarians in spite of a very liberal intake of vegetable fat. Simons et a1. (1978) confirmed reduced plasma cholesterol levels in vegetarians. Degree of saturation of dietary fat. Numerous inves- tigations have shown reductions in serum cholesterol con- centrations in man following the dietary substitution of many vegetable oils for common animal fats or certain tropical oils such as coconut oil (Kinsell et al., 1952, 1953; Ahrens et al., 1954, 1955; Bronte-Stewart et al., 1966; Beveridge et al., 1955, 1956). The relatively high degree of saturation of fats of animal origin and coconut oil had been associated with their cholesterol elevating effect and has led to the development of the concept that saturated fatty acids are hypercholesterolemic and that polyunsaturated fatty acids are hypocholesterolemic (Jolliffe, 1961). The relationship of the degree of saturation to serum cholesterol concentration has been studied and characterized 23 according to (l) the iodine number, (2) the P/S ratio, (3) the percent of total calories from saturated and poly- unsaturated fatty acids. Iodine number, a measure of total unsaturation of dietary fats, has been used by some investigators to quantify the effects of dietary fat modifications on serum cholesterol concentrations. Ahrens et a1. (1957) demon- strated a rough inverse relationship between serum choles- terol concentration and the iodine number of various oils. They concluded that serum cholesterol response to changes in dietary fat composition was proportional to the average net unsaturation of the fatty acids, and that monosaturated fatty acids were half as effective as linoleic acid, a diene, in reducing serum cholesterol levels. Gunning et a1. (1964) found that the plasma cholesterol levels of the four patients they studied were highly correlated with the square root of the iodine number of the total fat in the diet. They concluded that net unsaturation correlated better with plasma cholesterol levels than did either the P/S ratio or the ZS-P formula. Keys et al. (1965a) concurred that cholesterol level does correlate with the iodine value, or its square root, when total dietary fat is con- stant, provided that the fats contained no significant amounts of fatty acids more unsaturated than linoleic acid and that the proportion of monosaturated fatty acids did not vary widely. They found that changes in serum 24 cholesterol could be predicted with far greater accuracy from the amounts of saturated and polyunsaturated fatty acids than from total degree of unsaturation because the effects of some fatty acids on serum cholesterol were discrepant from what would be expected from a simple direct iodine number function. It was shown, for example, that the high degree of unsaturation beyond the dienes in fish oils was not reflected in the change in serum cholesterol concentration using iodine number as a predictor (Keys et al., 1965a). Jolliffe (1961) proposed that the effect of dietary fats on serum cholesterol concentration was related to their P/S ratio rather than to the net unsaturation of the dietary fatty acids, and that the P/S ratio could be used to predict the effect on serum cholesterol of modifying dietary fat. Keys et a1. (1957) also showed that quanti- tatively the P/S ratio was more significant than the quantity of dietary cholesterol in predicting serum cho- lesterol changes. Other investigators have found that P/S ratio did not always predict serum cholesterol changes accurately. Stamler (1960) observed that when the amount of saturated fat in the diet was controlled, the P/S ratio played a lessened role, particularly when the dietary cholesterol levels were below 400 mg/day. Connor et a1. (1964) showed that changing the P/S ratio from 0.2 to 2.6 had no effect on blood cholesterol when subjects consumed 25 a cholesterol-free diet. Erickson et a1. (1964) demon- strated that plasma cholesterol level was unaffected by variations in the P/S ratio between 0.1 and 1.6. Similar findings were reported by Bierenbaum et a1. (1961) who found no significant differences in serum cholesterol levels when subjects were fed diets containing 28% of total calories from fat, less than 400 mg cholesterol/day, and a P/S ratio of either 0.34 or 2.6. Keys et a1. (l965d)demonstrated that the relationship between dietary fat and serum cholesterol concentration could be described quantitatively from the percent of total calories as saturated and polyunsaturated fatty acids. From a comprehensive study in which groups of schizophrenic patients were fed a series of 40 different diets under metabolic conditions it was shown that saturated fatty acids had a cholesterol-raising effect that was twice the cholesterol-lowering effect of polyunsaturated fatty acids. It was also shown that monosaturated fatty acids were essentially neutral in their effect on serum cholesterol. Multiple regression equations were developed to relate the change in serum cholesterol to dietary content of saturated (S), monosaturated (M), and polyunsaturated (P) fatty acids and the following prediction equation was derived. ACholesterol (mg/100 ml) = -l.68-+ 2.76 AS + 0.05 AM - 1.35 AP in which AS, AM, and AP were the change in the 26 calories contributed by each class of fatty acids. The constant -1.68 and the coefficient for AM of 0.05 did not contribute significantly to the equation which was modified to ACholesterol (mg/100 m1) = 2.74 AS - 1.31 AP indicating that the relationship of saturated and poly- unsaturated fatty acids to serum cholesterol could be described as a function of ZS -P. Hegsted et a1. (1965) conducted a series of studies that were similar in design to those of Keys et a1. Groups of schi20phrenic patients were fed a low-fat, natural foods diet to which various test oils were added at levels varying from 22 to 38% of total calories from fat for four week diet periods. The following equation was derived to relate the changes in serum cholesterol to changes in dietary fat and cholesterol ACholesterol (mg/100 m1) = 2.16 AS - 1.65 AP + 6.66 AC - 0.53 where S and P are the changes in the percent of dietary calories derived from saturated and polyunsatu- rated fatty acids, respectively; C is the change in cholesterol intake in 100 mg/day. Both the equations by Hegsted et a1. (1965) and Keys et a1. (1965d) suggest that saturated fatty acids have, per weight basis, approximately twice the effect on the change in serum cholesterol as do the polyunsaturated fats, which act in the opposite direction. 27 Based on the small coefficient for monosaturated fatty acids Keys et a1. concluded that monosaturated fatty acids have no effect on serum cholesterol. Although the data of Hegsted et al. also yielded an equation with a small co- efficient for monosaturated fatty acids, they were reluctant to conclude that monosaturated fatty acids were neutral and could be isocalorically exchanged for starch in the diet without affecting serum cholesterol. This conclusion was based on the fact that significant regression coeffi- cients for monosaturated fatty acids were found when the data for each of the different trial diets were analyzed separately, as opposed to analyzing all the data from the different trial diets together. Chain length of fatty acids. There is considerable evidence that saturated fatty acids may vary substantially in their hypercholesterolemic effects (McGandy and Hegsted, 1975). Evidence that.shortchain fatty acids have much less influence on serum cholesterol than the longer chain fatty acids has been reported in the literature. Keys et a1. (l965d)demonstrated that saturated fatty acids containing fewer than 12 carbon atoms had little or no effect on serum cholesterol in man. They attributed this lack of effect to the fact that fatty acids with fewer than 12 carbon atoms in the chain are more polar and less hydrophobic than the other fatty acids and appear to be metabolized differently, being absorbed via the intestinal 28 capillaries and the hepatic portal system rather than via the lymphatics. The relative effects of the different fatty acids have been studied by various investigators. Based on the data available from their multiple regression equations Hegsted et a1. (1965) concluded that, aside from linoleic acid, the only other fatty acids clearly influencing the level of serum cholesterol were myristic ($14) and palmitic (516) acids; lauric ($12) and stearic (518) acids, satu- rated fatty acids with 10 carbon atoms or fewer, and monosaturated fatty acids had little effect on serum cholesterol concentration. Keys et al. (1955d) in con- trast, found that the cholesterol-promoting effect of saturated fatty acids was due to lauric, myristic, and palmitic acids. They concluded that since palmitic acid was much more abundant than lauric and myristic acids in most diets, it was primarily responsible for the contri- bution of dietary fat to the serum cholesterol level in man. They similarly reported a lack of effect on serum cholesterol level by stearic acid. This confirmed the findings of Connor et a1. (1964) that when diets containing substantial amounts of cocoa butter, which has a high content of stearic acid, were fed an unexpectedly low serum cholesterol level was observed. Several mechanisms have been proposed to explain the cholesterol lowering effect of polyunsaturated fats. The 29 literature contains evidence both for and against each of the proposed mechanisms. To date no single mechanism has been shown to apply in all cases. Grundy and Ahrens (1970) provide a good review of the effects of polyunsaturated fats on absorption, excretion, synthesis, and the distri- bution of cholesterol in man. The mechanisms are summarized briefly below: Fecal excretion of neutral steroids and/or bile acids. Polyunsaturated fat has been reported to cause both an increase (Lewis, 1958) and a decrease (Ali et al., 1966) in bile acid excretion; Grundy and Ahrens (1970) reported no change. An increase in bile acid excretion may be the result of decreased reabsorption of bile acids or increased conversion of cholesterol into bile acids. Cholesterol absorption. Several recent studies (Nestel et al., 1976; Grundy and Ahrens, 1970) have shown no difference in the absorption of dietary cholesterol when high polyunsaturated fat diets were consumed. This finding conflicts with an earlier report by Wood et a1. (1966) that showed a reduction in the absorption of choles- terol following a diet high in polyunsaturated fat. Cholesterol synthesis. It has been proposed that a decrease in the rate of cholesterol synthesis in the liver may contribute to the lowering of plasma cholesterol that follows the feeding of diets high in polyunsaturated fat. There have been no direct measurements of cholesterol 30 synthesis in vivo in man. Indirect measurements, however, in normolipemic (Nestel et al., 1976) and in hypercholes- terolemic subjects (Grundy and Ahrens, 1970) have shown no significant changes in cholesterol synthesis following ingestion of diets high in polyunsaturated fat. Distribution of cholesterol between plasma and tissue. Grundy and Ahrens (1970) proposed that polyunsaturated fat may lower serum cholesterol by causing its redistribution from plasma to one or more tissue compartments. Direct evidence for the transfer of cholesterol to tissues during polyunsaturated fat feeding in man is lacking. Summary Coronary heart disease is a major health problem in the United States as well as in many other countries. The results of epidemiologic, experimental, and clinical investigations have implicated elevated serum cholesterol levels as an important risk factor in the development of atherosclerosis. Although no causal relationship has been proven between serum cholesterol concentration and CH0, there is abundant evidence indicating that the risk of developing CHD is positively correlated with the level of cholesterol in the blood. A need exists for well-controlled research to study the effects on serum cholesterol of reducing cholesterol intake and modifying the amount and type of fat that is 31 normally consumed in the American diet. In order for the diet modifications to be meaningful they must be economi- cally feasible and easily incorporated into daily food preparation. The modified diet must be palatable and easily adapted to the individuaPs lifestyle. METHODS AND PROCEDURES Subject Recruitment Male subjects were recruited to participate in a 10- week feeding study by advertising in the campus newspaper. A total of 32 subjects was needed to participate in the two-part study: 16 in the Winter term and 16 in the Spring term. The same protocol was used in both terms. The criteria for eligibility in the study which were established in the protocol stated that the subjects should 1') ii) iii) like eggs, habitually consume eggs, and be willing to eat two eggs/day have serum cholesterol levels greater than 200 mg/ 100 ml agree to eat only the foods provided by the study at the arranged facilities be within i 20% of their desirable body weight and be willing to maintain this weight throughout the study be willing to maintain a relatively constant pattern of physical activity. 32 33 Screening‘Procedures A total of 107 men were screened for total serum cho- lesterol following a 14-hour overnight fast. Forty-seven men were found to have serum cholesterol values 2 200 mg/ 100 ml. Ultimately several people with screening serum cholesterol values in the 190 mg/100 ml range were invited to participate in the study because some of the men with higher serum cholesterol levels were unwilling to make a complete commitment to the study. The subjects who were selected received a physical examination and routine laboratory tests that included blood glucose, electrolytes, SGPT, SGOT, hematologic tests, and urinalysis. All screening laboratory tests were per- formed by a commercial medical laboratory that serves many of the local hospitals, the Student Health Center, and many of the research projects conducted at Michigan State University. The subjects were interviewed to obtain information about normal eating patterns, food allergies, food dislikes, coffee and tea consumption, smoking habits, and family medical history. The men were asked to keep a diet record on three consecutive days for the purpose of estimating energy requirements. They were given specific verbal and written directions in a cover letter accompanying the food record form instructing them to list all foods consumed, portion sizes, food preparation method and time of 34 consumption. An example of a complete diet record was provided. Despite the specific directions which were given, the diet records were returned in such an incomplete state that they were of limited value in predicting energy requirements. They did prove useful, however, in providing information, albeit sketchy, on the frequency of consumption of eggs, butter, milk and meat. Subject Characteristics Age, Race and Marital Status. With the exception of one subject who was 69 years old, subjects ranged in age from 19 to 42 years, with a mean age of 24.8 years (Table 1). Thirty subjects were Caucasian; two were Black. There were two sets of brothers participating in the study (subjects 3 and 4; 9 and 10); two of the brothers were fraternal twins. Three of the subjects were married and two had children. All but three subjects were students at Michigan State Uni- versity. The three non-student subjects worked adjacent to the university campus. Body Weight and Anthropometric Measurements. The body weights of the subjects measured at the time of their physical examinations ranged from 84 to 134% of the average weight/height for men of medium frame according to the 1960 Height-Weight chart of the Metropolitan Life Insurance Com- pany. Lean body mass (LBM) and body fat (BF) were estimated using measurements of flexed biceps circumference, height, 35 mmm Nu m.em m.n~ m.om m.om~ ap mm com om c.~m o.m~ ¢._~ ¢.mn~ em em emF «F m. mm o. mm m. pm m.om~ mm mm mom a m. ex m. em a. Fm ~.mmp mm mm m NmF mp mimm m1.bm buck m.mup mm Fm : mum mp m.~o «.mm m.Nm n.mm~ em om m.:.Fwsmd u Ezcwm wuom xcom mamuwm uumnnzm mcwcmmgom cam; m mupamwcmuuocmgo womnaam mo mpnmp Acm553m .P mpnmh 36 .ugmwmzcm>o o» mucmvcmpuo mmmpmnmmuuo mmxocumum m:o_m:mpcwax;u: mmcmmz mm mam mgowmn xumupm acmmgu Pocmpmmpocu o3» mgu co mmmcw>m mg» acmmmcamc mmzpm> mmmzhm N.op- m.o - m.e - F.NN- o.o_- m.oP- N_N ONN oeN cam: e.N - N.m - 0.? - N_- eF- m - oNN oeN eeN mN e.NF- m.a - N.N - oe- _N- a_- cop AFN CNN eN o.ee- N.o - N.N - Ne- N_- «N. eeN eoN NNN ON N.N_- a.mp- e.o + me- ee- _ + PN_ mNN eNN mp F.N + N.N + m._ - e + N + N - mo_ Nm_ map NF m.o + m.n + ¢.o - P + mF+ NF- mFN NON mPN op N.m_- o.m - m.__- cm. a - om- oNN NNN NeN e N.©F- N.a_- F.m + es- Nm- N + NPN CNN NoN _ N as _s oo.\ms mu-o “-0 “-0 pawn N10 N+_ _+u N+u N+_ F+u N P o nowaaa pawn PocmummFozo Ezcmm cw mmcmgu Pocmamm—ogu Eacmm uomnnzm meowcma yawn Pmpcme -wcwaxm xmmzue ummr mg“ mcwczn «unawamnam mam >9 umzoFFom .vowcma pave Pmucme -wcmgxm xmm31¢ umcww esp ucwcau xmc\mmmm N saw: “owe Focucou on“ co umzcwpcou on: mpumwaam cw mmcmzo mmwpcmucmn ecu Pocmummpogu Eacmm Fmpou we cowpmcucmucoo .n mpnmh 58 .N new F mcowcma umwu Popcmewcmaxm ms“ new Auv nowcmq Pocucou ms“ en. gum: umOF mg» Ease mwapm> Pocwummpogu Esgmm ozu on» Go mmmcm>m on» acmmmcamc mmOFO> mmmghm O._ + O.OP+ O.OP- O._+ P.ON+ O.NN- NNN NOF ANN OON: N.O + O.OP+ O.O_- O_+ NO+ ON- OON FON ONN ON o.m + o.w + N.N 1 NF+ w~+ o 1 oNN NON «FN mN O.P.- O O.__- ON- O ON- OO_ ON_ OON O_ O.N - O.O + O.O_- O - OP+ ON- OOO OO_ OON NP O.O - O.ON+ O.O_- F_+ NO+ _N- OON OO. OOF O_ O.OF- O.O - N.P_- Om- OP- ON- OO_ OON NON OP O.O + O.ON+ O.NF- O + OO+ NO- OON OON NNN O O.__+ O.ON+ O.O_- Om+ OO+ ON- OON OON OON N N Os Fe OOP\OE O-O mm-O O-O OOOO N+O N+_ F+O N+O N+F F+O N F O OOOLOO OOPO Pocmummpocu Ezcmm cw mmcmgu Pocmummpocu Escmm gumnnzm on; mpumwnzm cw wmcmgu mmmucmocma new Pocmumopogu Ezcmm Pmaou mo cowpmgucmucou muopcmn pawn qucmewcmaxm xmmzle HOOP any mcwczu mamm an cwzoP—oe .uowcma umwc Fmpcmswcwaxm xmm31¢ amcwm use mcwczv muzuwumasm mom gng gown Focpcou as» umssmcou .m mpnmh 59 .N van P Ouowcma pmwu Poucwswcmaxm msu was Au HOOP mgu Eocm mmspm> Focmpmmpoco Ezcmm 03p on» mo m N nowcma umwu pocpcou mzp mo New: Osm>m an» pcmmmcamc moapm> mmmcpm O.ON- O.O - O.NN- O.OO- O.N - N.ON- OON NON ONN OOOz N.O - O.ON- O.O + ON- ON- O + OON NNN NNN NO O.O_- N.N - N.N_- ON- N - ON- ONN NNN OON ON O.NN- O.N - O.NN- NO- NN- OO- NNN OON OON NN O.ON- O O.ON- OO- O OO- OON OON OON NN O.NN- N.O - O.ON- OO- ON- NO- OON OON ONN NN N.ON- N.NN- N.ON- OO- ON- OO- OON NNN OON NF O.N - O O.N - ON- O ON- OON OON ONN O O.NN- O.ON+ O.ON- NN- ON+ NO- NNN OON OON O N Os NE OONNOE OO-Nz O-N: N-O OONO N-O N-N N-O N+O N+_ N+O N N O OONLOO OONO Nocmpmwposu Ezcmm cw mmcmgu Focmummposu Eacmm pumnnsm OvoNcmO “own Pmucmswcmaxm xmmz-O NOON wzu mcwczu waspwgmnzm mam Np cmzonow .vowcma “owe paucmswgmaxm xmmz-O NONNN ms» mcwczn xmc\mmmm N gpwz “own um» umNONuoE on» emanmcoo on: Opomwnzm cw mmcmcu wmmucmucma new Focmumwpogo Ezcmm Page» mo cowumcucmucou .m mpamh 60 .N GOO N OOONNOO Omwu Nmpcmewcmaxm on“ new NOV OOONOO OONO _ocpcou No New: NOON on» seem OOONO> OONOOOOOOOO sacmm o2» us“ No mmmcm>O mgp ucmmmcqmc OOOFO> mmmshm O.O - N._N+ O.ON- O.NN- N.ON+ O.NO- OON OON NNN OOOz O.ON- O.O + O.ON- NO- O + OO- OON OON OON OO O.O - O.O_+ O ON- ON. NO+ NO- OON OON OON ON O.ON- O.N_+ O.NN- NO- NN+ OO- OON OON OON ON O.NN- O.N + O.NN- ON- NN+ OO- NNN OON OON ON O.N - N.NN+ N.ON- ON- ON+ OO- OON ONN OON ON O.O - O.O + O.O - O - ON+ ON- OON NON ONN O O.O - O.O_+ O.ON- O - ON+ OO- OON ONN OON O O.ON- O.ON+ O.NO- OO- NN+ OO- OON NON NON N N Os Ne OONNOE O-O: OO-Oz O-O OOOO N+O N-N N+O N+O N-N N+O N N O OOOLOO OOOO PocmpOmPosu Ezcmm cw mmcmgu PocmumwFogu Eagmm mpumwaam OOOOOOO OOOO Nmucmewcmaxm xmmz-O NOON ms» mcwczu Oomm Na umzoppow .uowcma pmwn Pmucmswcmnxm xmmz-O NOON» on» mcwczu muauwumnsm mam OON: umwu OON uwwwwuos ms» umssmcou 0:3 OOOOOOOO cw mmcmgu mmmucmucma ucm Pocmummpogu Escmm Pmuop mo cornmcucmucou .o_ mpnmh 61 16.6 mg decrease. This represents a 6.6% decrease from the average values from the first experimental diet period. The serum cholesterol values during the egg-free period was on the average 27.1 mg below the control period values, with decreases ranging from 17 to 44 mg in six of the sub- jects. One subject had a final serum cholesterol value 1 mg above his control period value, while the eighth subject's cholesterol level was 4 mg above his control period level. When subjects were placed on the egg-free control diet for four weeks following the 10-day control diet with two eggs/day, all eight subjects experienced a decrease in serum cholesterol ranging from 6 to 32 mg, with an average decrease of 23.8 mg for the group (Table 8). This repre- sents an average decrease of 10.8% below the average control period value. When eggs were added back to this diet six of the eight subjects demonstrated an increase in serum choles- terol levels ranging from 16 to 58 mg. One subject showed an additional 10 mg decrease in serum cholesterol when eggs were added back to the diet, and one subject showed no change. The average serum cholesterol value for this group during the last week of the four week diet period was 25.1 mg/100 ml higher than the value for the egg-free diet period of the previous four weeks. This change repre- sents an average increase of 13.3% above the average values 62 from the egg-free diet period. Five of the eight subjects had higher serum cholesterol values when eggs were added back to the diet than they had when consuming the same diet eight weeks previously. When placed on the modified fat diet with two eggs/day following the 10-day control diet with two eggs/day, seven of the eight subjects experienced a decrease in serum cho- lesterol ranging from 15 to 48 mg (Table 9). The eighth subject demonstrated a 4 mg increase. The average change for the group was a 28.1 mg or 12.5% decrease below the control period value. When eggs were replaced by an egg substitute during the last four weeks of the modified fat diet, five of the eight subjects experienced an additional decrease in serum cholesterol ranging from 2 to 33 mg. Two subjects showed no change, and one subject demonstrated a 25 mg increase when eggs were removed from the diet. The average change in serum cholesterol when eggs were removed from the modi- fied fat diet was an 8.9 mg or 3.5% decrease. The average serum cholesterol level during the last week of the final experiment diet period on the egg-free modified fat diet was 35.8 mg below the average serum cholesterol value during the lO-day control period. When subjects were placed on the egg-free modified fat diet for four weeks following the lO-day control diet with two eggs/day, all eight subjects experienced a decrease in 63 serum cholesterol ranging from 25 to 65 mg, with an average decrease of 41.1 mg or 19.0% (Table 10). When eggs were added back to this modified fat diet for four weeks all eight subjects experienced an increase in serum cholesterol ranging from 8 to 31 mg, with an average increase of 18.9 mg, or 11.2%. The average group serum cholesterol level during the last week of this final experimental period was 21.5 mg below the average value during the 10-day control period when subjects were consuming a diet with more total fat, saturated fat and cholesterol. Figure 1 summarizes the changes in serum cholesterol concentration relative to the control period values for the four diet groups. Replacement of eggs with egg substitute resulted in a decrease in serum cholesterol in both the control and modified fat diets groups. The addition of eggs back to the egg-free control and modified fat diets produced an increase in serum cholesterol concentration in both groups. The decrease in serum cholesterol concentra- tion that occurred when subjects were placed on the modified fat diet was greater than the decrease in serum cholesterol that occured when eggs were replaced by egg substitute in the control diet. It is not known why the 8 subjects who continued on the same control diet with 2 eggs/day during the first experi- mental diet period demonstrated a mean reduction in serum cholesterol concentration of 10.5 mg, or 4%. Four of the Figure 1. 64 The changes in total serum cholesterol con- centration during the two 4-week experimental diet periods relative to the control period were found for each of the four diet groups (8 subjects/group) by subtracting the average values of the last two serum cholesterol values for the experimental diet periods from the mean value of the last two serum cholesterol values of the lO-day control period. The symbols used are as follows: C-E =the control diet with 2 eggs/day C-ES =control diet with egg substitute replacing eggs MF-E =modified fat diet with 2 eggs/ day MF-ES=modified fat diet with egg sub- stitute replacing eggs 65 Control Diets _ C-E ' +1.4 -23.8 -27-1 Modified Fat Diets C-E MF-E MF-ES C-E MF-ES MF-E -35.8 66 subjects in this group experienced a decrease in serum cholesterol concentration, with the greatest decrease equal to 30 mg. One subject experienced an 8 mg increase in serum cholesterol and 3 subjects showed essentially no change. This group demonstrated the greatest variability in response to dietary changes. The reason for this is unclear. Analysis of variance of the serum cholesterol values obtained by the commercial laboratory revealed significant diet and treatment effects at the 5% level, indicating that the changes in serum cholesterol seen in this study were related to the type of diet (control vs modified fat diet) and to treatment with either eggs or egg substitute (Table 11). No significant group or seasonal effect was found, thus allowing us to combine the data for subjects from both the Winter and Spring terms. No significant period effect was seen, indicating that the changes in serum cholesterol seen in this study were not related to the sequencing of the experimental diets (i.e. eggSOegg substitute vs egg substi- tuteOeggs). The same level of significance was found when the data were analyzed by averaging all the serum choles- terol values within a diet period or when averaging only the last two values of each diet period. Correlation between average weekly body weights and weekly serum cholesterol levels was computed for the entire group of 32 subjects. No correlation was found at the 5% 67 Table 11. Analysis of variance of the data for total serum cholesterola Sources of Variation DF F1 F2 CV Seasons 1 0.09 0.09 Diets (Control vs MF) 1 13.77* 12.23* 4.20 SXD 1 3.25 0.08 Error (Subject/SD) 28 Periods 1.78 2.48 Treatments 12.88* 28.19* SXT 2.89 0.02 4.21 DXT 0.47 1.24 SXDXT 1 0.21 0.01 Error2 (Residual) 27 63 *Significant at p<0.05. aSymbols used are as follows: DF=degrees of freedom CV=critical value S=Seasons (Winter vs Spring terms) D=Diets (Control vs Modified Fat) T=Treatment (Eggs vs Egg Substitute) F1=f ratio for the average of all values F2=f ratio for the average of the last two values significance level 68 (r=0.66). DISCUSSION The purpose of this study was to compare the effects on total serum cholesterol of replacing 2 eggs/day in the diet with a cholesterol—free egg substitute and changing from a typical American diet to a modified fat diet that is lower in total and saturated fat and higher in polyun- saturated fat. The modified fat diet utilized was similar to the diet recommended in the Report of the Inter-Society Commission for Heart Disease Resources (1972). The menu was made up entirely of natural foods that are customarily consumed by the United States population. The amount and type of dietary fat and cholesterol fed in the study were within the normal range of consumption in the United States (Keys et al., 1974). Unlike other studies reported in the literature the subjects were not adapted to a cholesterol- free diet, or to a diet to which they were not accustomed. Attempts were made to individualize the menu for each subject in order to accommodate food dislikes and preferences, to maintain weight, and to provide a diet that approximated as closely as possible the customary diets of the subjects. 69 70 The Design of the Study The split-plot design of this study allowed for analysis of the effects of various factors (e.g., diet, treatment) as well as of their combined effects (e.g., diet x treatment). The crossover design in which each subject served as his own control eliminated the possi- bility of factors other than those related to diet influen- cing the results. The study was designed to correspond to the lO-week academic term. The study was planned to terminate before the week of final exams in order to avoid the stress that often accompanies studying for exams. The influence of stress on serum cholesterol levels has been documented by Dreyfus and Czaczkes (1959), who have shown an increase in serum cholesterol concentration in medical students at exam time. Since one of the criteria for eligibility in the study stated that subjects must like and habitually consume eggs, the control period was assumed to be an extension of the subjects' customary diets. A lO-day control period was believed to be adequate for the estimation of caloric needs, collection of baseline data, and adjustment of subjects to experimental procedures. Keys et a1. (1974) pointed out that all, or nearly all, of the dietary fat- serum cholesterol response of man is exhibited in two or at the most three weeks. In view of this fact, four weeks 71 was determined to be an adequate period of time for the experimental diet periods. Subject Selection Young male subjects with moderately elevated serum cholesterol levels were selected to participate in the study because they are considered to be at high risk for CHD and a segment of the population who would benefit from preventive dietary measures. Enos et a1. (1955) provided pathological data on young American soldiers killed in the Korean war that demonstrated that atherosclerosis was already present in young men in their 20's. It has been assumed that elimination of the risk factors for athero- sclerotic heart disease (of which serum cholesterol is one) at an early age would be more effective than after athero- sclerosis is in an advanced state. In the Oslo diet-heart study, Leren (1970) showed that the reduction in the recur- rence of heart attacks after dietary modification was evident only in the younger men in the study. Because of the relationship of serum cholesterol levels to the menstrual cycle, female subjects were not included in the study. Serum cholesterol levels have been shown to decrease in women at the time of ovulation (Oliver and Boyd, 1953). 72 Subject Compliance All 32 subjects completed the lO-week study. There were very 'few food rejections or complaints. The excep- tionally high subject compliance that was seen in this study was probably related to their genuine concerns, in view of their family histories, about the risk of CHD. Also, many of the subjects had participated in or were involved in their own research and they were aware of the importance of reliable information. It would seem, too, that the gourmet menu contributed, at least in part, to the adherence to the diet. At the end of the ten weeks, even after having seen the same menu five times, many of the subjects requested copies of the recipes. Body,Weight Subjects were weighed daily and adjustments in caloric intake were made regularly because it has been shown that rapid weight gain or loss was paralleled by elevations or depressions, respectively, in serum cholesterol levels (Anderson et al., 1957). Brunner et a1. (1979) reported similar findings. Although several subjects in the present study experienced some fluctuation in body weight, the changes were not rapid or extreme, and no correlation was found at the 5% significance level between weekly body weight values and weekly serum cholesterol concentrations 0.66). for the total group of subjects (r 73 Alcohol Consumption One 12 ounce can of beer was included in the daily diet plan of six subjects. Other subjects occasionally substituted 12 ounces of beer for two slices of bread, which are approximately comparable in calorie content. There was no apparent difference between the subjects who consumed beer on a daily basis and the subjects who consumed no alcohol during the 10-week study in either the direction or the magnitude of response of serum cholesterol to diet modifications. Similarly, there was no apparent difference in serum cholesterol response to diet modifications in the subjects who, on occasion, substituted beer for bread. These subjects were asked to refrain from substituting beers on the days preceeding blood tests. It was believed that the beer would be fully metabolized before bloods were drawn and that such small quantities of alcohol con- sumed on an occasional basis would have little or no effect on total serum cholesterol levels. Although the short term effect of alcohol on serum lipid levels has been studied experimentally in man the methodology is often questionable. Many of the partici- pants in such research were alcoholics who were temporarily deprived of alcohol before the experiments. Also the number of subjects in each study generally was small. Friedman et al. (1965) demonstrated no short term effect of alcohol on serum cholesterol levels in daily drinkers 74 who continued their usual pattern of imbibing. Carey et a1. (1971) showed that "moderate" alcohol intake, 20% of total calories as alcohol,ingested during the evening for 12 consecutive days, had no noticeable effect on cholesterol. Ostrander et a1. (1974), in contrast, found that frequency of alcohol ingestion was significantly related to serum cholesterol concentration among the 202 male participants in the Tecumseh epidemiological study. These findings were based on data obtained from questionnaires on the drinking habits of each subject, followed by a blood test for serum lipid determinations. Again, the methodology to provide this type of data is questionable because of the possibility of the subjects' reports of alcohol intake being influenced by their concept of society's view on alcohol consumption. Changes in Serum Cholesterol The results reported here indicate that dietary cho- lesterol may influence serum cholesterol concentration in healthy males. Addition or deletion of 2 eggs/day from the diet generally produced parallel changes in total serum cholesterol concentration. Replacement of eggs with an equivalent serving of cholesterol-free egg substitute resulted in average reductions in serum cholesterol of approximately 17 and 24 mg/100 ml, or 7 and 11%, respec- tively, in each of the two diet groups consuming the high saturated fat diets. The addition of eggs to the diet 75 of the subjects who consumed the egg substitute in the first experimental diet period resulted in a 25 mg/100 ml or 13% increase in serum cholesterol. These findings conflict with those of Slater et a1. (1976), Porter et a1. (1977) and Flynn et a1. (1979), who found a lack of association between egg consumption and serum cholesterol concentration in healthy subjects. The intake of foods other than eggs, however, was not controlled in these studies. It is conceivable that the variation in cholesterol intake from other foods and the variation in the amount and type of fat may have been sufficient to mask the effect of adding or deleting two eggs from the diet. During the control period with 2 eggs/day subjects were consuming approximately 270 mg of cholesterol/1000 kcal compared to approximately 105 mg cholesterol/1000 kcal on the control diet with egg substitute. According to the following prediction equation proposed by Keys et al. (1965b) ACholesterol (mg/100 m1) = 1.5 ((Adietary cholesterol mg/lOOO kcal)1/2) one would expect a 19 mg decrease in total serum cholesterol concentration with the removal of 2 eggs/day from the control diet. The results of this study are in agreement with the predicted value from the Keys equation. 76 Based on the results of a comprehensive study on schizophrenic patients under metabolic conditions, Hegsted et a1. (1965) found that for each 100 mg change in dietary cholesterol one could predidt a change in total serum cholesterol of approximately 5 mg/100 ml. Using this equation one would expect a 27 mg decrease in serum cho- lesterol concentration following the removal of 2 eggs/day from the control diet. The observed value was somewhat lower than the predicted value. A prediction equation was developed by Mattson et a1. (1972) which related changes in dietary cholesterol to serum cholesterol levels. This equation predicted a 12 mg/ 100 m1 change for each 100 mg change in dietary cholesterol/ 1000 kcal, or a 20 mg decrease in serum cholesterol concen- tration for subjects on the control diet following the removal of eggs from the diet. Based on the evaluation of the combined results of 19 sets of experiments by several different investigators, Keys et a1. (1974) predicted that the serum cholesterol response to the addition of two eggs/day to the diet would be an increase of 10 or 12 mg. In the present study mean increases in serum cholesterol concentration of 25.1 and 19.1 mg were observed when eggs were added back to the control and modified fat diets, respectively, following the 4-week diet period in which eggs were replaced by egg substitute. These increases in serum cholesterol 77 concentration are approximately twice as large as the values predicted by Keys et a1. When the percent of total calories from fat was re- duced from 45 to 35 and the P/S ratio was increased from 0.45 to 1.10 on the modified fat diet the subjects demon- strated a statistically significant decrease (p<.05) in total serum cholesterol. When eggs were replaced by egg substitute in the modified fat diet an additional decrease in serum cholesterol was seen. The decrease in serum cholesterol concentration that occurred when subjects were placed on the modified fat diet was greater than the decrease in serum cholesterol that occurred when eggs were replaced by egg substitute. These findings are in agreement with those of Keys et a1. (1965) and McGandy and Hegsted (1975), who found that the potential for altering serum cholesterol was greater by the modification of dietary fats than by restriction of dietary cholesterol. The results of the present study disagree with the conclusion by Mattson et a1. (1972) that a change in the intake of cholesterol may be more important than a change in dietary fat in reducing serum cholesterol levels. The degree of responsiveness of serum cholesterol levels to removal of eggs from the diet did not appear to be related to the subjects' initial serum cholesterol levels or to the order in which dietary changes were 78 initiated.. For example, subject 19, whose control period cholesterol level was 224 mg/100 ml experienced a 44 mg decrease (19.6%) in cholesterol when eggs were removed from the diet (Table 7). Subject 4, on the other hand, whose cholesterol level during the control period was 262 mg/100 ml, experienced only a 6 mg or 2.6% decrease when eggs were removed from the diet. For both of these subjects eggs were replaced by egg substitute during the last four weeks of the study. The same lack of correlation was seen between initial serum cholesterol levels and magnitude of response to removal of eggs from the diet when the eggs were replaced by egg substitute immediately following the control period. Subject 31 whose control period serum cholesterol level was 224 mg/100 ml experi- enced a 23 mg or 10.3% decrease in serum cholesterol when eggs were replaced by egg substitute (Table 8). Subject 7 whose control period serum cholesterol level was 262 mg/ 100 m1 demonstrated a 28 mg decrease (10.6%) when placed on the egg-free diet. Similarly, the magnitude of response to cholesterol intake on the modified fat diets did not appear to be related to the subjects' initial serum cholesterol levels or to the order in which eggs were added or deleted from the diet. Subject 22 whose control period serum cholesterol level was 236 mg/100 ml showed a 48 mg or 20.3% decrease in total serum cholesterol after consuming the modified fat 79 diet with two eggs/day for four weeks (Table 9). In contrast, subject 27 from the same diet group experienced a 30 mg or 11.3% decrease from his control period value of 264 mg/100 ml. When eggs were removed from their diet during the last four weeks of the study, subject 22 experienced no additional decrease in serum cholesterol whereas subject 27 experienced a 17 mg or 7.3% decrease. The degree of responsiveness of serum cholesterol concen- trations to changes in the diet did not appear to be related to family history of heart disease, hypertension, diabetes, or to tendency to overweight. CONCLUSIONS The results of this study indicate that mean reduc- tions in serum cholesterol of approximately 5 to 10% can be achieved in healthy young men when two eggs/day are replaced by a cholesterol-free egg substitute in a typical American diet. A 10 to 12% reduction in serum cholesterol was achieved when subjects consumed diets lower in total and saturated fat, and higher in polyunsaturated fat; when eggs were replaced by the egg substitute in this modified fat diet a 15 to 19% mean reduction in serum cholesterol was achieved. These findings are in agreement with those reported by Christakis et a1. (1966), the National Diet-Heart Study Research Group (1968), Turpeinen et a1. (1968) and Leren (1970), who demonstrated mean reductions in blood cholesterol of 10 to 15% with diet modifications in men participating in longitudinal studies. These studies have shown that with continued diet modifi- cation these reductions in serum cholesterol can be maintained for years. Although a causal relationship between serum choles- terol concentration and coronary heart disease has yet to be proven, strong evidence exists that suggests that BO 81 elevated serum cholesterol is an important risk factor in the development of atherosclerosis. The results of this study have shown that it is possible to decrease serum cholesterol level by diet modification. Whether diet modification will lead to a reduction in the prevalence of CHD remains to be seen. It is only logical, however, that an attempt should be made to reduce or remove the risk factors over which man has control. SUGGESTIONS FOR FURTHER RESEARCH The results of the present study indicate that addi- tion or deletion of two eggs/day and modification of the amount and type of fat in the diet do influence the concen- tration of cholesterol in the serum of healthy, young men with moderately elevated levels of serum cholesterol. A similar study conducted on larger population samples would enable one to more accurately quantitate the effects of these two types of diet modifications on serum cholesterol. It would seem highly desirable to increase the length of the experimental diet periods to determine whether further changes or adaptation of serum cholesterol levels would occur with time. 82 APPENDICES APPENDIX A 83 APPENDIX A-1 Consent form for screening serum cholesterol determination Michigan State University Human Cholesterol Study Department of Food Science and Human Nutrition 1977 CONSENT FORM I, , agree to participate in a screening test for a study of the effect of the dietary intake of eggs and an egg substitute on serum cholesterol. The purpose and the nature of the study have been explained to me by , and I have been given an opportunity to ask questions. Criteria for selection of participants in the study have been described and I agree to the preliminary blood tests and physical examination, realizing that they will be used to determine my eligibility for further participation. I understand that my participation in these preliminary tests does not guarantee that I will be selected as a subject for this study. I understand that I can withdraw from the study at any time without penalty and that results will be treated in strict confidence. Signed: Date: 84 APPENDIX A-2 Consent form for participation in the cholesterol study DEPARTMENT OF FOOD SCIENCE AND HUMAN NUTRITION MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY EAST LANSING, MICHIGAN I, , agree to participate in a study of the effect of the dietary intake of eggs and an egg substitute on serum cholesterol. The purpose and nature of the study have been explained to me by , and I have been given an opportunity to ask questions. Criteria for selection of participants in the study have been described and I agree to the pre- liminary blood tests and physical examination, realizing that they will be used to determine my eligibility for further participation. If I am selected for the study I am aware of the potential risks which may be involved as well as any possible benefits. However, I understand that my participation in the study does not guarantee any beneficial results to me as an individual. My participation in this experiment can be terminated by me at any time without penalty. I understand that the results of the study will be treated in strict confidence and that I will remain anonymous. A summary of the results of this experiment will be provided to me at my request. Signed: Date: APPENDIX B 85 APPENDIX B Two week sample menu for subjects on the control diet with 2 eggs/daya Week 1 BREAKFAST LUNCH DINNER Pineapple juice Macaroni & cheese Baked pork loin Eggs Tossed salad (170 g)/cr. mush— English muffin Kraft cr. Russian room soup MON Butter, jelly drsg Stovetop dressing Milk Canned peaches Brussel sprouts Peanut butter cookies SPICY applesauce Cherry bavarian Bread;butter Apricot juice Hamburger (180 g)/ Baked fish (170 g)/ Eggs bun dill and wine sauce Toast Potato chips Baked potato/sour Butter, jelly Raw spinach salad/ cream Milk creamy Russian Cut green beans TUES dressing Tossed salad/blue Sherbet cheese drsg Angel cake/frozen strawberries Bread, butter Milk Orange juice Beef noodle Cup-A- Beef kabobs (170 g)/ Cold cereal Soup green pepper, onion, Banana Egg salad/tomato & mushrooms Toast cucumber slices Rice WED Butter, jelly Rye bread Carrot sticks Milk Oatmeal cookies Baked custard/grape- Milk nuts Bread, butter Milk Grapefruit juice Sliced ham (80 g)/ Chicken cashew - 1 Eggs Syrian bread serving Toast Potato salad , Chow mein noodles Butter, jelly Dill pickle spear Broccoli THURS Milk Baked apple/dates, Coconut mandarin cinnamon & brown sugar Milk salad Lemon bisque Bread, butter Milk 86 BREAKFAST LUNCH DINNER Canned peaches Roast beef sandwich Omelet/mushrooms Cold cereal (120 9) French fries Raisins Celery sticks Sausage links FRI Date nut muffin Banana Tossed salad/French Butter, jelly Sugar cookies dressing Milk Butter Chocolate cake Sugar Milk Bread, butter Milk Apple juice Turkey (113 g)/ Swiss steak (170 g) French toast/sirup Butter Milk Fried eggs sandwich Parsley potato Toast lettuce, tomato, Pea pods SAT Butter, jelly mayonnaise Cottage cheese/pine- Milk Coleslaw apple ring Jello/peach & pear Spiced apple cake halves Bread, butter Milk Milk Snack Orange juice Baked pork loin (170 Milk Eggs g)/barbecue sauce Cereal Canadian bacon Oven fried potato SUN Fruit (85 g) Peas Waldorf salad Ice cream/chocolate sauce, pecans Banana Bread, butter Milk aReplacement of eggs with egg substitute was the only change made in the diet when subjects were placed on their respective egg-free diets. The portion sizes of many food items (e.g. juice, bread, vegetables, fruit, baked goods, butter/margarine, salad dressings, and milk) varied from subject to subject according to type of diet (Control vs Modified Fat), energy requirements, and food preferences. Coffee and tea were available at each meal and were allowed ad libitum. 87 Week 2 - Control BREAKFAST LUNCH DINNER Grapefruit half Chili con carne Baked veal cutlet Eggs Crackers (142 g) Toast Tossed salad/Italian Rice Butter, jelly dressing Cut green beans MON Milk Oatmeal cookies Cucumber & onion/ Butter mock sour cream Milk Yellow cake/praline topping Bread, butter Milk Pineapple juice Fish fillets (135 Broiled steak (170 9) Eggs g)/bun Baked potato Bran muffins Tartar sauce Zucchini vegetable Butter, jelly Carrot & celery medley TUES Milk sticks Tomato juice Peanut butter Sherbet cookies Bread, butter Apple Milk Milk Banana Hamburger (180 g)/ Quiche/cheese, BacO- Orange juice bun bits Cold cereal Carrot sticks Broccoli WED Toast Pineapple upside Tossed salad/French Butter, jelly down cake dressing Milk Milk Fresh mixed fruit cup Bread, butter Milk Cranapple juice Chicken noodle Cup- Meatloaf - 1 serving Eggs A-Soup Potato kuegel Date nut muffin Peanut butter/jelly Peas/mushrooms THURS Butter, jelly sandwich Pear/shredded cheese Milk Potato chips on endive Orange Ice cream Sugar cookies Bread, butter Milk Milk Apricot juice Hot dog (91 g)/bun Oven baked chicken Eggs catsup, mustard, (120 g) Toast pickle relish Acorn squash/brown FRI Butter, jelly French fries sugar Milk Celery sticks Brownie Milk 3 bean salad Cherry cobbler Bread, butter Milk 88 BREAKFAST LUNCH DINNER Grapefruit juice Ham (113 g) sandwich/ Pizza/sausage-l ser- Eggs lettuce, mustard ving Toast Potato salad Tossed salad/Italian SAT Butter, jelly Apple crisp dressing Milk Milk Canned peaches Sugar cookies Milk Snack Orange juice Roast beef (150 g ck) Milk Eggs Mashed potatoes/gravy Cereal Sausage (41 9) Green beans SUN Banana Waffles/sirup & butter Tossed salad/French Milk dressing Pumpkin pie Bread, butter Milk 89 Two week sample menu for subjects on the modified fat diet Week 1 with 2 eggs/daya BREAKFAST LUNCH DINNER Pineapple juice Eggs English muffins Macaroni & cheese (skim milk) Tossed salad/creamy Baked pork (142 91/ cr mushroom soup Stovetop dressing MON Jelly, margarine Russian dressing Brussel s routs Skim milk Canned peaches SPICY app esauce Peanut butter cookie Cherry bavarian Skim milk Bread, margarine Skim milk Apricot juice Hamburger (120 g)/bun Baked fish (170 g)/ Eggs Potato chips dill & wine Toast Raw spinach salad/ Baked potato/margarine Margarine, jelly creamy Russian dres- CUt green beans TUE Skim milk . sing Tossed salad/blue Sherbet cheese dressing Margarine Angel cake/frozen Skim milk strawberries Bread, margarine Skim milk Orange juice Beef noodle Cup-A-Soup Beef kabobs (142 g)/ Cold cereal Egg salad/ green pepper, onion, Banana tomato & cucumber mushrooms Toast slices Rice WED Margarine, jelly Rye bread Carrot sticks Skim milk Oatmeal cookies Baked custard (skim)/ Sugar Skim milk grapenuts English walnuts Bread, margarine Skim milk Grapefruit juice Pineapple juice Chicken cashew - 1 Eggs Ham (80 gl/Syrian serving Toast bread Chow mein noodles Margarine, jelly Potato salad Broccoli Skim milk Dill pickle spear Coconut mandarin THURS Baked apple/dates, salad brown sugar, Eng walnuts, cinnamon Skim milk Lemon bisque (skim) Bread, margarine Skim milk 9O BREAKFAST LUNCH DINNER Canned peaches Cold cereal Bran muffin Roast beef (120 g) sandwich Celery sticks Omelet (skim, marga- rine)/mushrooms Sausage links Margarine, jelly Banana French fried potatoes FRI Skim milk Sugar cookies Tossed salad/French Skim milk dressing Chocolate cake Bread, margarine Skim milk Apple juice Turkey (113 g) sand- Swiss steak (170 g) Fried eggs wich/lettuce, Parsley potato Toast tomato, mayonnaise Pea pods SAT Margarine, jelly Coleslaw Cotta e cheese (low Skim milk Jello/peach & pear fat /pineapp1e ring halves Spiced apple cake Skim milk Bread, margarine Skim milk HS snack Orange juice Baked pork loin (114 Cold cereal Eggs g)/barbecue Skim milk Morningstar breakfast Oven fried potatoes Apple slices Peas French toast/sirup Tossed salad/French SUN Margarine dressing, 5 hard Skim milk cooked egg Apricots Sherbet/chocolate sauce/pecans Banana Bread, margarine Skim milk Week 2 - Modified 91 BREAKFAST LUNCH DINNER Grapefruit half Apple juice Baked veal cutlet (142 9) Eggs Chili con carne Rice Toast Crackers Cut green beans Margarine, jelly Tossed salad/Italian Cucumber & onion/mock MON Skim milk dressing sour cream Oatmeal cookies Yellow cake/praline Rosano cheese (chol- topping free) Bread, margarine Skim milk Skim milk Pineapple juice Fish fillets (100 91/ Broiled steak (142 9) Eggs bun Baked potato Bran muffins Tartar sauce Zucchini vegetable medley TUE Margarine, jelly Tossed salad/French Tomato juice Skim milk dressing Sherbet/chocolate sauce Peanut butter cookie Margarine Apple Skim milk Snack: fruit Skim milk Banana Hamburger (90 gl/bun Quiche (skim)/Bac0bits Orange juice catsup, mustard Broccoli Cold cereal Carrot sticks Tossed salad/French WED Toast Pineapple upside down dressing Margarine, jelly cake Fresh mixed fruit cup Skim milk Skim milk Bread, margarine Skim milk Cranapple juice Chicken noodle Cup- Meatloaf-l serving Eggs A-Soup Potato kuegel Date nut muffin Peanut butter/jelly Peas/mushrooms THURS Margarine, jelly sandwich Pear/shredded cheddar Skim milk Orange cheese on endive Sugar cookies Ice cream Skim milk Bread, margarine Skim milk Apricot juice Hot dog (91 g)/bun Oven baked chicken (1209) Eggs catsup, mustard, Acorn squash/brown sugar Toast pickle relish 3 bean salad FRI Margarine, jelly Celery sticks Cherry cobbler Skim milk Brownie Bread, margarine Skim milk Skim milk Snack apple 92 BREAKFAST LUNCH DINNER Grapefruit juice Ham (113 g) sandwich/ Pizza/Morningstar Eggs lettuce, mustard sausage SAT Toast Potato salad Tossed salad/Italian Margarine, jelly Apple crisp dressing Skim milk Skim milk Canned peaches Sugar cookies Skim milk HS snack Orange juice Roast beef (150 g Skim milk Eggs ck) Cold cereal Sausage (41 g) Mashed potatoes/ SUN Banana Waffles/sirup & gravy Sugar packet butter Skim milk Green beans Celery sticks Pumpkin pie Bread, margarine Skim milk APPENDIX C 93 APPENDIX C-l Serum Cholesterol Determination by the Laboratory at Reagents 1. Procedure 1. Michigan State University FeSo :CH COOH 4 3 Place about 60 g ferrous sulfate (FeSO4:7H20) in 1 liter glacial acetic acid. Allow to stand for at least 3 hours. Filter and store in glass bottle at room temperature. Solution remains stable for several months (00 not use if solution has any color). Stock Cholesterol Standard 5 mg cholesterol/m1 chloroform Store in refrigerator A series of working standards were prepared daily using the stock cholesterol standard and chloro- form methanol. Stock Cholesterol mg/100 ml Standard ONCE; 100 0.2 0.8 200 0.4 0.6 300 0.6 0.4 500 1.0 0.0 \OCDNOS 10. 11. 12. 94 With micropipeter, transfer an aliquot of serum or standard (0.1 ml)to small test tube. For blank, use chloroform. Add 2.5 m1 chloroform-methanol solution (2:1). Mix. Cover test tubes with marbles and place in hot water bath (50-60) for 15 min. Cool. Mix. Centrifuge at 3000 rpm for 15 min. With automatic dilutor, remove 1.0 ml of the super- natant and add to it 6.0 m1 FeSO4-CH3COOH in large test tube. Add 2.0 ml H2504 (conc.) and immediately mix thoroughly. Cool. Read Optical Density at 490 mp. 95 Principles of the Procedures for Quantitative Determination of Cholesterol in Serum by the Hycel Super Seventeen Method 1. Extraction: Cholesterol and cholesterol esters are soluble in organic solvents but almost insoluble in aqueous solvents. 2. Color Reaction: Cholesterol is dehydrated in an acidic medium to yield 3,5-cholestadiene. There is some question about the reactions that follow which produce the green color measured at 625 nm. It has been thought that the cholestadiene is dimerized to bis-3,5-cholestadiene which in turn reacts with sulfuric acid to form cholestadi- ene-3-monosulfonic acid. Recently, however, evidence has been presented which indicates that the cholestadiene is oxidized by sulfuric acid to yield a pentaenylic cation which is the colored species. APPENDIX D amp amp amp owp ONO omp ow? om— ow— amp om omp omp mew mOF map map may mep map ma— mp Nap Nap Pep Nap NOP NOP mOP may evp cap mp mm: mm: mm: NNN NNN NNN NNN NNN 2: 3: N— nep map may omp omp Pmp Nm— «mp mm_ mm_ @— Pop mop mop mop mop oo— mop on, NNF NNN mp sup mmp wmp wmp omp Pmp Pwp pr Pap pr OF moF mo— mop mop mop mop mop cup Fur mmp m_ mop amp cop cop mop mop mm— mop mop cup NF rm? omr Pmp omp om” omp vmp mmp vm— mmp FF pr Pmp owp Fmp omp mnp cm, on— mnp mnp op may wep map mep Pmp om— Nmp mmp amp «mp m 00F mo— mop mop mop mop mop mop mop on? w eep evp me— mew nap NON we— mep wv— om, m mON OON «ON vow mom NoN mom mow mON opN o Nmp Nmp Nap Nap Nmr Nm— Nap Fm— Nap mmp m Rep ovp omp Fmp Nmp mmp nmp mmp cop No_ a amp cap oep pep Nap Nap ¢¢F vep meF mep m cop mop mop mop sop mop mop mop any Pup N mmp emp mmp mmp mmp mmp mmp “mp mm? wmp p op m m N m m a m N P pumnnzm Oxmmz Omuomwnam POOOO>NOON cow Amnpv mugmwmz Anon xpxmmz mmmcm>< o x~ozmmm< 97 .xmmz :umm mo Omumcasp cmzocgp NOONLO co Omcammme Ousmwmz Oven NFNOO cow OOPO> :Ome ms“ OONOONOOOOO On OOOON mcmz OOOONmz Oven apxwmz mOOLm>< Flu x~ozmmm< 99 OOO OOO OO.O N0.0 O.NO 0.00 N.NON 0.00N 0.0N N.OO _.NNN 0.0NN NO ONO NOO O0.0 OO.O O.OO O.OO 0.00N N.OON 0.00 0.00 N.ONN N.ONN ON OOO ONO O0.0 O0.0 O.OO N.OO N.OON 0.00N O.OO N.ON 0.0NN N.ONN ON ONO OOO O0.0 OO.O 0.00 0.00 0.00N O.NON 0.0_ 0.0_ N.NN_ 0.0N_ NN OOO ONO N0.0 O0.0 O.NO O.NO O.NNN O.NON 0.00 0.0N O.OO_ O.ONN ON OOO ONO O0.0 O0.0 N.OO N.OO 0.00N 0.00, 0.00 0.0N O.ONN N.ONN ON OOO OOO O0.0 O0.0 O.OO N.OO 0.00_ N.OON N.ON. 0.0N O.NNN 0.0NN O OOO OOO O0.0 O0.0 O.OO O.OO N.OO_ N.OON 0.0. N.O_ O.ONN O.NNN N 0-0 OO-O 0-0 OO-O O-O OO-O 0-0 OO-O O-O OO-O O-O OO-O OOOOOOO NOEO OOLOOOONOOO ONO OOO N NOO OOO ONOOOOO N NOO ONOOOLO .Oowcma pmpcmswcmaxm Ocouwm ms» OONNOO Am-OV OOONOOOO N OOO .OOOLOO OOOO Faucmepgmaxm “ONO; ms» OONNOO Amm-Ov OOOOOOOOOO OOO OOO: OOOO Nocpcou asp OOO muumnazm LOO mxmucw OOOONOOO OOOLO>< Num xHozmmmm lOO ONN ONN NO.N OO.N. N.OO 0.00 N.OON O.NON 0.0_ 0.0. N.ONN 0.0_N NO ONN NON OO.N NN.N N.OO 0.00 0.00. N.OO_ 0.0N 0.0_ O.NON N.OON ON OON NNN NN._ O_.N N.OO 0.00 O.NNN O.NNN N.ON N.ON 0.0N_ 0.0NN NN OON OON OO._ N_._ 0.00 0.00 N.OON O.NON N.OO N.ON 0.00N N.OON NN OON ONN ON.N O0.0 0.00 N.OO 0.0NN 0.0NN 0.0. 0.0_ N.ON. O.NNN NO NO_ NON OO.N OO.N 0.00 0.00 0.0NN N.OO. N.OO O.NO O.NNN O.NON ON NON NON OO.N N_._ 0.00 0.00 0.0NN N.ONN 0.00 0.0N O.NON O.NON O ONN OON OO._ OO.N 0.00 N.OO 0.00, 0.00N 0.0N O.NO N.OON 0.00. O OO-Oz 0-0: OO-Oz O-O: OO-Oz O-O: OO-O: O-O: OO-Oz O-O: OO-Oz O-O: OOOOOOO NOEO NOLOOOONOOO ONO OOO N NOO OOO NOOON. ONOOOOO N NOO ONOOOLO .Oowgma pawn Faucmewcmaxm xwmzuv Ocoumm mgu OOONOO Amm-Ozv OOOOOOOOOO OOO OOO cowcma umOO _Ouzms_gmaxm xwmz-O OON?» mzu OOOLOO Am-Ozv OOO\OOOO N OOO: OONO OON Omwwvuos mzu com Ouumwnam Low mxmucw pcowcuac mmmgm>< mum x~ozmmm< 101 ONN OOO OF.F OO.P 0.0m 0.0m O.PN_ 0.0N_ 0.0— 0.0_ 0.0N_ O.NN_ om ONN FOP OO.F Om.p 0.00 0.00 0.00, w.FPP O.NO N.NP 0.0N_ N.ONP ON NNN OOO FP._ OO.F 0.0m N.OO O.FNF N.ONF N.O_ 0.00 N.Omp N.ON_ ON ONN NON OO.~ ON.” 0.0m N.Om O.FP— N.OPP N.OO N.OO O.NN. O.NN_ ON OON OON O0.0 ON._ N.Om N.Om m.FF_ N.OPF 0.0_ 0.00 0.0NP O.NFF OP ONN FOO OO.F mm._ N.OO 0.00 O.NON 0.00_ _.N_ O.N— O.NPF 0.0__ O mmN ONN mp._ Om.F 0.00 0.00 O.NN_ N.ONF 0.00 0.0_ 0.00P O.Nmp O NON OO— m—._ Nm.— 0.0m 0.00 0.0NF O.PNO 0.00 N.O_ O.Nmp 0.0mp N 0-0: OO-Oz 0-0: OO-Oz 0-0: OO-Oz 0-0: OO-Oz 0-0: OO-Oz 0-0: OO-Oz OOOOOOO Amevpocmummpogu OOO N NOV OOO cwmuoga N NOV :Omuoca .Oowcma OOOO Panama upcmaxm Ocoumm on» chszu Am-Ozv AOO\OOOO N OOO Oowgma “OOO Fmacmswcmaxm NOON» ms» OONNOO NOO-Ozv OOOOOOOOOO OOO OOO: OOOO OOO OOOOOOOE OOO OOO OOOOOOOO LOO OOOOON OOOOOOOO OOOOOOO «um x~ozmmm< APPENDIX F 102 NON NNN OON NON OON NON OON ONN ONN ONN NON OON NON ONN ON OON NO_ OON OO_ NON OON O_N OON ONN ONN ONN OON OON ONN ON NON OON NON N_N ONN NNN OON OON OON NNN OON OON NOO OON ON NON ONO OON OON OOO ONN NNN OON ONN OON ONN ONN ONN NFN ON NON NON OON OON NON NON NON OON OON OON OON OON - OON m_ NNN NNN ONN ONN NON OON OON OON NNN ONN NNN OON - OON O_ NNN NON ONN NNN NNN ONN OON ONN OON ONN NON ONN - ONN O _NN ONN ONN OON NNN NON NON NON OON OON OON NON - O_N N ON ON NN __ ON O O N O O O O N N gmnsaz mFOEmm noopm pumnnsm mm-u "N cowgmm Faucmswgwqu mnu “F nowgma Faucmswgmaxm m-u "vowgma Fogpcou .cowgma pawn Pmucmswgmaxm vcoomm msp m=_gau Amm-uv mpaupumasm mom was .Oowgma pmwu ngcmewgmaxm HOLNN mzp mcwgau Amuuv OOONOmmm N 59?: pmwu Pospcou ms» OOO muumwnam Now Ape oo—Nmsv mmzpm> pogmpmm—ocu Ezgmm POO mo mOOON Fug x~ozmam< 103 OON OON ONN NON N—N OON OON ONN OON ONN ONN OON OON OON NO ONN NON OON NNN NON OON OON NON ONN OON ONN NON OON NON MN OON OON OON NON OON ONN OON NON NNN NON OON ONN NNN NNN ON NNN FOP OON OOO NON OON OON OOO ONN NON OON OON OON NON NP OON OON OON NNN OON OON OON NOO OON OON NOO OOO - ONN OF OON OON OON OON NON NON ONN NNN ONN OON ONN OON . ONN OF OON OON ONN OON OON OON NNN NNN NON OON NNN NON - OON O NON NON OON ONN OON ONN OON NNN OON OON OON OON . - N O— ON NF Np OF O O N O O O O N _ Ownszz ONOEOO voopm pomnnzm O-O ”N cowgmq Nmucmswgmaxw Omuu "N Oowgma —mpcmswgqum O-O ”nopgmm Pogucoo .OONOOO pmwv qucmswsmaxm Occumm on“ chgzv N0-0V OOONOOOO N can .nowgma ammo qucmswgmaxw pmgww mg“ chgzv NOO-OV muauwpmnam OOm cup: umwu Pogpcou OOO OOO muumnazm LOO ANS OONNOEV mmapm> NOLOOOOFOOO EOLOO FPO we «NOON Nun xHoszO< 104 OON OON mmp mop mwN ONN ONN ONN NNN ONN ONN u n 1 NM NNN NON OON NOO OON ONN ONN ONN OON ONN OON OON OON ow— ON ONN o—N P—N NNN NON NON NON OON OON OON MON ONN OON OON NN MON MON NON NON mw— OON NON ONN u OON NON OON NON OON NN om— NON NON omp wmp NON OON ONN NNN OON mmN ONN s OON NF NON OON OON OON mop OON ONN NON OON ONN OON NON u NON NP OON NON NON OON mmp NON ONN NNN NON OON NNN ONN u OON m ONN POP OON mwp OON OON OON OON mm— OON NON OON u NNN m ON ON NP NP op O m N O O O m N N Ownssz ONOEOO OOONO pumnasm mmuuz "N uowgma Ompcmevgmaxm O-N: up OONLOO Nmucmswgqum O-O "OoOLmO Nogucou mum xHOzuOO< .Oowgwa umwu pmucmsvgmnxm ucouwm exp chgau NOO-OzV musuwpmnam OOO use .Oowgma “ONO Nmucmswgmaxm umgww mcu chgzv NO-OzV NOONOOOO o3» saw: “OOO you vmwwmuos mg» OOO mpumnaam Low APE OONNOEV mmzNO> Nogmpmmpogu Eagmm POO we mNnON 105 NNN OON OON NON OON OON OON OON OON OON ONN OON ONN mON Om ON— ONN NON ONN OO— NO— NON OON NOO NNN NON NNN NON ONN ON ONN NON NON NON OON OON OON ONN NON OON OON OON OON OON ON NNN NON NNN OON OON OON OON NON ONN ONN OON OON . - ON OON OOO ONN ONN NNN OON NON NON NON ONN OON OON . OON ON OON OON NNN NNN ONN OON OON OON OOO OON ONN . - NNN O OON NON OON OON ONN ONN NNN NON OON OON OON NNN . ONN O NON OON NON ONN OON OO— OON NON OON NO— _ON ONN . OON N ON OF NO ON ON O O N O O O m N N LOOEOz ONOEOO nooNO pumnnam O-O: "N Oowgmm Faucmewgmaxm OO-mz "N nowgmg Nmpcmswgmaxm O-O “OONLOO Nogucou cowgma pmwu Fmpcmswgmaxm ucoumm ms» OONLOO Amuuzv NOONOOOO N van .uowgma umwu Foucmswgmaxm pmgwm mzu chgau Ammumzv mpzaNamazm OOm OON: pmpv NOO OONONOOE mg» om» mpumwnzm Low NOE OONNOEV mmzpm> Nogmpmmpocu Eagmm ONO mo «NOON 0-0 xHoszO< LIST OF REFERENCES LIST OF REFERENCES Adams, C.F. Nutritive Value of American Foods in Common Units. No. 456. Agricultural Research Service. United States Department of Agriculture. Washington, D.C. November, 1975. Ahrens, E.H., D.H. Blackenhorn and T.T. Tsaltas. Effect of human serum lipids of substituting plant for animal fat in the diet. Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med. 86:872- 878, 1954. Ahrens, E.H., T.T. Tsaltas, J. Hirsch and W. Insul1. Effects of dietary fats on the serum lipids of human subjects. J. Clin. Invest. 34:918, 1955 (abstr.). Ahrens, E.H., J. Hirsch, W. Insull, T.T. Tsaltas, R. Blom- strand and M.L. Peterson. The influence of dietary fats on serum-lipid levels in man. Lancet 1:943-953, 1957. Ahrens, E.H. The management of hyperlipidemia: Whether, rather than how. Ann. Intern. Med. 85:87-93, 1976. Ali, 5.5., A. Kukis and J.M.R. Beveridge. Excretion of bile acids by three men on corn oil and butterfat diets. Can. J. Biochem. 44:1377-1388, 1966. Anderson, B.A. Comprehensive evaluation of fatty acids in foods. VII. Pork products. J. Am. Diet. Assoc. 69: 44-49, 1976. Anderson, B.A., G.A. Fristrom and J.I. Weihrauch. Compre- hensive evaluation of fatty acids in foods. X. Lamb and Veal. J. Am. Diet. Assoc. 70:53-58, 1977. Anderson, B.A., J.A. Kinsella and B.K. Watt. Comprehensive evaluation of fatty acids in foods. II. Beef products. J. Am. Diet. Assoc. 67:35-41, 1975. Anderson, J.T., A. Lawler and A. Keys. Weight gain from simple overeating. II. Serum lipids and blood volume. J. Clin. Invest. 36:81-88, 1957. Anderson, J.T., F. Grande and A. Keys. Cholesterol-lowering diets. J. Am. Diet. Assoc. 62:133-142, 1973. 106 107 Anderson, J.T., F. Grande and A. Keys. Independence of the effects of cholesterol and degree of saturation of the fat in the diet on serum cholesterol in man. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 29:1184-1189, 1976. Anitschkow, N. Experimental arteriosclerosis in animals. In: Arteriosclerosis. Cowdry, E.V., New York: McMillan Co. 1933. PP. 271-322. Bersohn, J. and S. Wayburne. Serum cholesterol concentra- tion in new-born African and European infants and their mothers. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 4:117-123, 1956. Beveridge, J.M.R., W.F. Connell, G.A. Mayer, J.B. First- brook and M.S. DeWolfe. The effects of certain vegetable and animal fats on the plasma lipids of humans. J. Nutr. 56:311-320. 1955. Beveridge, J.M.R., W.F. Connell and G.A. Mayer. Dietary factors affecting the level of plasma cholesterol in humans: the role of fat. Canad. J. Biochem. 34:441- 455, 1967. Beveridge, J.M.R., W.F. Connell, G.A. Mayer and H.L. Haust. The response of man to dietary cholesterol. J. Nutr. 71:61-65, 1960. Bierenbaum,M.L., D.P. Green, A.B. Caldwell and E.H. Kelly. Blood cholesterol and coronary heart disease: Pre- liminary report. J. Med. Soc. New Jersey 58:134-138, 1961. Brignoli, C.A., J.E. Kinsella and J.I. Weihrauch. Compre- hensive evaluation of fatty acids in foods. V. Un- hydrogenated fats and oils. J. Am. Diet. Assoc. 68 224-229, 1976. Bronte-Stewart, 8., A. Antonis, L. Eales and J.F. Brock. Effects of feeding different fats on serum cholesterol level. Lancet 1:521-526, 1966. Brunner, D., J. Weissbort, M. Fischer, J.E. Bearman, K. Loebl, S. Schwartz and S. Levin. Serum lipid response to a high-caloric, high fat diet in agricultural workers during 12 months. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 32: 1342-1349, 1979. Carey, M.A., J.D. Jones and C.F. Gastineau. Effect of moderate alcohol intake on blood chemistry values. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 216:1766-1769, 1971. 108 Carlson, L.A. and S. Bottiger. Ischaemic heart disease in relation to fasting values of plasma triglycerides and cholesterol. Stockholm prospective study. Lancet 1:865-868, 1972. Chapman, J.M. and F.J. Massey. The interrelationship of serum cholesterol, hypertension, body weight and risk of coronary heart disease. Results of the first ten years follow-up in the Los Angeles heart study. J. Chron. Dis. 17:933-949. 1964. Chobanian, A.V. and W. Hollander. Body cholesterol metabo- lism in man. 1. The equilibration of serum and tissue cholesterol. J. Clin. Invest. 41:1732-1736, 1962. Christakis, G., S.H. Rinzler, M. Archer, G. Winslow, L. Jampel, J. Stephenson, G. Friedman, H. Fein, A. Kraus and G. James. The anti-coronary club. A dietary approach to the prevention of coronary heart disease-- a seven year report. Am. J. Publ. Hlth. 56:299-314. 1966. Connor, W.E., R.E. Hodges and R.E. Bleiler. The serum lipids in men receiving high cholesterol and choles- terol-free diets. J. Clin. Invest. 40:894-901, 1961. Connor, W.E. and C.S. Jackson. The regression of choles- terol-4-C from the blood and tissues of animals: The effect of dietary corn oil compared with a low fat diet. Circulation 28:653, 1963 (abstr). Connor, W.E., 0.8. Stone and R.E. Hodges. The interrela- ted effects of dietary cholesterol and fat upon human serum lipid levels. J. Clin. Invest. 43:1691-1696, 1964. Connor, W.E. and S.L. Connor. The key role of nutritional factors in the prevention of coronary heart disease. Prev. Med. 1:49-83, 1972. Connor, W.E. and 0.5. Lin. The intestinal absorption of dietary cholesterol by hypercholesterolemic (type II) and normocholesterolemic humans. J. Clin. Invest. 53: 1062-1070, 1974. Cook, R.P., D.C. Edwards and C. Ridell. Cholesterol metabolism. 7. Cholesterol absorption and excretion in man. Biochem. J. 62:225-235, 1956. De Langen, C.D. Cholesterike-stoffwisseling en rassenpathologie. Geneesk Tijdschrift Nederl-Indie 26:1-34, 1916. 109 Dreyfus, F. and J. Czaczkes. Blood cholesterol and uric acid of healthy medical students under stress of examination. Arch. Intern. Med. 103:708-711. 1959. Enos, W.F., J.C. Beyer and R.H. Holmes. Pathogenesis of coronary disease in American soldiers killed in Korea. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 158:912-914. 1955. Erickson, B.A., R.R. Coots, F.H. Mattson and A.M. Kligman. The effect of partial hydrogenation of dietary fats. of the ratio of polyunsaturated to saturated fatty acids, and of dietary cholesterol upon plasma lipids in man. J. Clin. Invest. 43:2017-2025, 1964. Exler. J. and J.L. Weihrauch. Comprehensive evaluation of fatty acids in foods. VIII. Finfish. J. Am. Diet. Assoc. 69:243-248. 1976. Feeley, R.H., P.E. Criner and B.K. Watt. Cholesterol con- tent of foods. J. Am. Diet. Assoc. 61:134-149, 1972. Flynn, M.A., G.B. Nolph, T.C. Flynn, R. Kahrs and G. Krause. Effect of dietary egg on human serum cholesterol and triglycerides. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 32:1051-1057, 1979. Friedman, M., R.H. Rosenman and 5.0. Byers. Effect of moderate ingestion of alcohol upon serum triglyceride responses of normo- and hyperlipemic subjects. Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med. 120:696-698. 1965. Fristrom. G.A. and J.L. Weihrauch. Comprehensive evaluation of fatty acids in foods. IX. Fowl. J. Am. Diet. Assoc. 69:517-522. 1976. Gotto, A.M. Introduction. In: Atherosclerosis Reviews. Vol. 5. Paoletti, R. and A.M. Gotto. New York: Raven Press. 1979, pp. vii-x. Grande, F., J.T. Anderson. C. Chlouverakis. M. Proja and A. Keys. Effect of dietary cholesterol on man's serum lipids. J. Nutr. 87:52-62. 1965. Grande. F., J.T. Anderson and A. Keys. Diets of different fatty acid composition producing identical serum cho- lesterol levels in man. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 25:53-60, 1972. Grundy, S.M. and E.H. Ahrens. The effects of unsaturated dietary fats on absorption, excretion, synthesis, and distribution of cholesterol in man. J. Clin. Invest. 49:1135-1152, 1970. 110 Gunning, B.E.. K. Imaichi, S.D. Splitter and L.W. Kinsell. Effects of different fats on plasma lipid levels. Lancet 2:336-341. 1964. Hardinge. M., H. Crooks and F. Stare. Nutritional studies of vegetarians. IV. Dietary fatty acids and serum cholesterol levels. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 10:516-524. 1962. Hegsted. D.M., R.B. McGandy, M.L. Myers and F.J. Stare. Quantitative effects of dietary fat on serum choles- terol in man. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 17:281-295. 1965. Helwig. L.. P.H. Hofmeyer and J. Kieler. Famine disease in German concentration camps: complications and sequels. Acta. Med. Scand. 144 (suppl. 274):3-460. 1952. Hildreth, E.A., S.M. Mellinkoff, G.W. Blair and D.M. Hi1- dreth. The effect of vegetable fat ingestion on human serum cholesterol concentration. Circulation 3: 641-646. 1951. Jolliffe. N. and M. Archer. Statistical associations between international coronary heart disease death rates and certain environmental factors. J. Chron. Dis. 9:636-652, 1959. Jolliffe. N. Dietary factors regulating serum cholesterol. Metabolism 10:497-513. 1961. Kannel, W.B.. W.P. Castelli, 1. Gordon and P.M. McNamara. Serum cholesterol, lipoproteins. and the risk of coronary heart disease. Ann. Intern. Med. 74:1-12. 1971. Katz, L.N., J. Stamler and R. Pick. Nutrition and Athero- sclerosis. Philadelphia: Lea and Febiger. 1958. Keys. A., 0. Mickelsen. E.V.O. Miller and C.B. Chapman. The relation in man between cholesterol levels in the diet and in the blood. Science 112:79-81, 1950. Keys, A. Human atherosclerosis and the diet. Circulation 5:115-118, 1952. Keys, A., J.T. Anderson, F. Fidanza, M.H. Keys and B. Swahn. Effects of diet on blood lipids in man: particularly cholesterol and lipoproteins. Clin. Chem. 1:34-52, 1955. 111 Keys. A., J.T. Anderson, 0. Mickelson, S.F. Adelson and F. Fidanza. Diet and serum cholesterol in man. Lack of effect of dietary cholesterol. J. Nutr. 59: 39-56. 1956. Keys. A., J.T. Anderson and F. Grande. Prediction of serum cholesterol responses of man to changes in fats in the diet. Lancet 2:959-966, l957a. Keys, A., J.T. Anderson and F. Grande. Essential fatty acids. degree of unsaturation, and effect of corn (maize) oil on the serum cholesterol level in man. Lancet 1:66-68. 1957b. Keys. A., H.L. Taylor. H. Blackburn. J. Brozek, J.T. Ander- son and E. Simonson. Coronary heart disease among Minnesota business men and professional men followed 15 years. Circulation 28:381-395. 1963. Keys. A., J.T. Anderson and F. Grande. Serum cholesterol response to changes in the diet. I. Iodine value of dietary fat versus ZS-P. Metabolism 14:747-758. l965a. , Keys, A., J.T. Anderson and F. Grande. Serum cholesterol response to changes in the diet. II. The effect of cholesterol in the diet. Metabolism 14:759-765. l965b. Keys. A., J.T. Anderson and F. Grande. Serum cholesterol response to changes in the diet. III. Differences among individuals. Metabolism 14:766-775. 1965c. Keys. A., J.T. Anderson and F. Grande. Serum cholesterol response to changes in the diet. IV. Particular saturated fatty acids in the diet. Metabolism 14: 776-787. l965d. Keys, A. and R.W. Parlin. Serum cholesterol response to changes in dietary lipids. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 19: 175-180, 1966. Keys, A. Coronary heart disease in seven countries. Circulation 41 (Suppl. I). 1-19. 1970. Keys, A., F. Grande and J.T. Anderson. Bias and misrepre- sentation revisited: Perspective on saturated fat. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 27:188-212. 1974. Keys. A. Coronary heart disease--the global picture. Atherosclerosis 22:149-192. 1975. 112 Kinsell, L.W., J. Partridge, L. Boling. S. Margen and G. Michaels. Dietary modification of serum cholesterol and phospholipid levels. J. Clin. Endocr. 12:909- 913, 1952. Kinsell, L.W.. G.D. Michaels. J.W. Partridge, L.A. Boling. H.E. Balch and G.C. Cochrane. Effect upon serum cholesterol and phospholipids of diets containing large amounts of vegetable fat. J. Clin. Nutr. 1: 224-230. 1953. Kummerow, F.A., Y. Kim, M.D. Hull, J. Pollard, P. Illinov. D.L. Dorossiev and J. Valek. The influence of egg consumption on the serum cholesterol level in human subjects. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 30:664-673. 1977. Leren. P. The 0510 diet heart study. Eleven year report. Circulation 42:935-942. 1970. Leveille, G.A., J.W. Shockley and H.E. Sauberlich. Influ- ence of dietary protein level and aminoacids on plasma cholesterol of growing chick. J. Nutr. 76:321-323. 1962. Lewis, B. Effect of certain dietary oils on bile-acid secretion and serum cholesterol. Lancet 1:1090-1092, 1958. Logan. W.P.D. Mortality from coronary and myocardial disease in different social classes. Lancet 1:758- 759. 1952. Malmros. H. and G. Wigand. The effect on serum cholesterol of diets containing different fats. Lancet 2:1-7. l957. Mattson. F.H., B.A. Erickson and A.M. Kligman. Effect of dietary cholesterol on serum cholesterol in man. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 25:589-594. 1972. Mayer. G.A., W.F. Connell. M.S. DeWolfe and J.M.R. Beveridge. Diet and plasma cholesterol levels. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2:316-321, 1954. McGandy, R.B. and D.M. Hegsted. Quantitative effects of dietary fat and cholesterol on serum cholesterol in man. In: The Role of Fats in Human Nutrition. Ver- groesen (ed.). New York: Academic Press, 1975. Messinger. W.J.. Y. Porosowska and J.M. Steele. Effect of feeding egg yolk and cholesterol on serum cholesterol levels. Arch. Intern. Med. 86:189-195. 1950. 113 National Diet-Heart Study Research Group. The national diet heart study: final report. Circulation 37 (Suppl. I):l-203, 1965. Nestel, P.J. and A. Poyser. Changes in cholesterol syn- thesis and excretion when cholesterol intake is increased. Metabolism 25:1591-1599, 1976. Oliver. M. and G. Boyd. Changes in plasma lipids during menstrual cycle. Clin. Sci. 12:217-222. 1953. Ostrander. L.D.. D.E. Lamphier. W.D. Block. B.J. Johnson. C. Ravenscroft, F.H. Epstein. Relationship of serum lipid concentrations to alcohol consumption. Arch. Intern. Med. 134:451-456. 1974. Porter, M.W., W. Yamanaka, S.D. Carlson and M.S. Flynn. Effect of dietary eggs on serum cholesterol and tri- glyceride of human males. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 30: 490-495, 1977. Posati, L.P., J.E. Kinsella and B.K. Watt. Comprehensive evaluation of fatty acids in foods. 1. Dairy products. J. Am. Diet. Assoc. 66:482-488. 1975. Posati, L.P.. J.E. Kinsella and B.K. Watt. Comprehensive evaluation of fatty acids in foods. III. Eggs and egg products. J. Am. Diet. Assoc. 67:111-115. 1975. Posati. L.P. and M.L. Orr. Composition of foods. Dairy and egg products. Raw-Processed-Prepared. Agricul- tural Handbook No. 8-1. Agricultural Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture, Washington. D.C.. November 1976. Quintao, E., S.M. Grundy and E.H. Ahrens. An evaluation of four methods for measuring cholesterol absorption by the intestine in man. J. Lipid. Res. 12:221-232. 1971. Quintao, E., S.M. Grundy and E.H. Ahrens. Effects of dietary cholesterol on regulation of total body cho- lesterol in man. J. Lipid. Res. 12:233-247. 1971. Report of the Inter-Society Commission for Heart Disease Resources. Primary prevention of atherosclerotic diseases. Circulation 42:A55-A95, 1970 (Revised April 1972). Rosenman, R.H., M. Friedman, R. Straus. C.D. Jenkins. S.J. Zyzanski and M. Wurm. Coronary heart diseast in the Western Collaborative Group Study. J. Chron. Dis. 23:173-190. 1970. 114 Searcy, R.L. and L.M. Berquist. A new color reaction for the quantification of serum cholesterol. Clin. Chim. Acta. 5:192-196. 1960. Shorey, R.L., K. Brewten. B. Sewell and M. O'Brien. Alter- ation of serum lipids in a group of free-living adult males. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 27:268-275. 1974. Simons, L.A., J.C. Gibson. C. Paino, M. Kosking. J. Bullock and J. Trim. The influence of a wide range of absorbed cholesterol on plasma cholesterol levels in man. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 31:1334-1339. 1978. Slater, G.. J. Mead, G. Dopeshwarkar, S. Robinson and R.B. Alfin-Slater. Plasma cholesterol and triglycerides in men with added eggs in the diet. Nutr. Rep. Intl. 14: 249-259, 1976. Sodhi. H.S. and D.T. Mason. New insights into the homeo- stasis of plasma cholesterol. Am. J. Med. 63:325- 327, 1977. Stamler, J. Current status of the dietary prevention and treatment of atherosclerotic coronary heart disease. Progr. Cardiovas. Dis. 3:56-85, 1960. Stanbury, J.B., J.B. Wyngaarden and 0.5. Fredrickson. The Metabolic Basis of Inherited Disease. 3rd ed. New York: McGraw Hill, 1972, pp. 577. 600. Steiner, A. and B. Domanski. Dietary hypercholesterolemia Am. J. Med. Sci. 201:820-824. 1941. Steiner. A., E.J. Howard and S. Akgun. Importance of dietary cholesterol in man. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 181: 186-189, 1962. Torr. M., A. Katchalsky, J. Agmon and D. Allalouf. Athero- sclerosis and related factors in immigrants to Israel. Circulation 22:265-279, 1960. Turpeinen, 0.. M. Miettinen. M.J. Karvonen. P. Roine, M. Pekkarinen, E.J. Lehtosuo and P. Alivirta. Dietary prevention of coronary heart disease: Long-term experiment. Am. JL. Clin. Nutr. 21:255-276. 1968. Vogel. J. The Pathological Anatomy of the Human Body. lst ed. Philadelphia: Lea and Blanchard. 1847. p. 531. 115 Weihrauch, J.I., J.E. Kinsella and B.K. Watt. Comprehen- sive evaluation of fatty acids in foods. VI. Cereal products. J. Am. Diet. Assoc. 68:335-340. 1976. Wilson, J.D. The quantification of cholesterol excretion and degradation in the isoptopic steady state in the rat: the influence of dietary cholesterol. J. Lip. Res. 5:409-417. 1964. Wilson, J.D. and C.H. Lindsey. Studies on the influence of dietary cholesterol on cholesterol metabolism in isotopic steady state in man. J. Clin. Invest. 44:1805-1814, 1965. Wood, P.D.S., R. Shioda and L.W. Kinsell. Dietary regula- tion of cholesterol metabolism. Lancet 2:604-607, 1966. Wright, H.F. and J.H. Wilmore. Estimation of relative body fat and lean body weight in a U.S. Marine popu- lation. Aerospace Med. 45:301-306. 1974.