TH! INFIJJENCE OF SEVERAL FACTORS ON THE ACTION OF PENICILLIN AGAINST SOME MEMBERS OF THE ENTEROBACTERIACEAE Thai: for the Dogm of Ph. D. MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY Dale Emil Bord? 5 ' 1955 This is to certify that the thesis entitled The Influence of Several Factors on the Action of Penicillin Agains Some i-fenifiers of the Enterohacteriacede. presented In] Dale Pordt has been accepted towards fulfillment of the requirements for __Eh_11._ degree in W10 gy \v l\:\vl l .:\ .\ . x x‘ 1K"\ \\ \ Iajor \professor TEE INFLUHCE OF SEVERAL FACTORS ON THE ACTION OF PENICILLIN AGAINST SOME MEMBERS OF THE ENTEROBACTERIACEAE 3: Belle mil Bordt AN ABSTRACT Submitted to the School of Graduate Studies of Michigan Stete University or‘Agriculture end Applied Science in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree or DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Depertnent or Iiercbiclcgy and Public Health 1955 ' Anya-Wed __ bWMmmA/Qg 1 w 3. Dale mu Bordt AN ABSTRACT Yericus teeters were studied to determine their in- fluence on penicillin ection against selected members of m W. ”The medium used was the synthetic medium of Young, legs end Pent: (1944) Iith lactose as the sole carbon source. In this indium soo units of penicillin per ml were found to be bectericidel to W 2.9—1.6 Penicillin was most ,eetive‘ly beeterioidel when exposure took. place after ebout six hours et 3'? 0, which corresponds to the length of lag of L 933.1 in this medium. Dilution see not an effective means for reduction of penicillin there recovery of previously exposed organisms was desired. hnicillinase was found to destroy penicillin effectively and to allow recovery of previously exposed cells. A euch higher concentration of the enzyme ves required for recovery of cells exposed to penicillin then nee necessery to inactivate the same amount of penicillin under identical con- ditions of time and temperature. W W was found to survive exposure to 200 units of penicillin per ml, provided a sufficient preincubation tee enployed before exposure. This was evidently due to the 2 Dale m1 Bordt fact that penicillin is active only against growing cells. The addition of approximately one percent sterile fecal material resulted in a bactericidal action of penicillin 08010“ E; m. ‘l'his was presumably due to the fact that the fecal material contributed growth substances to the nediun, and thus established the penicillin effect. Sodium arsenite in proper concentration was shown to be becterioetatic against members of the genus W, but not against other gjggobgcteziaceae. Sodium arsenite in a 0.003 percent concentration in this synthetic medium pro- tected certain selmonellee from penicillin activity even in the presence of one percent fecal material. The presence of two percent tryptose and 0.02 percent cysteine in the plating medium materially enhanced the re- covery of fl... w from exposure to penicillin. m addition of 0.5 percent lactose and 0.005 percent triphenyltetragsoliun chloride to the plating medium resulted in colonies of diagnostic significance. Lactose non-ferment- ing organisms reduced the tetrazolium salt and formed dark red colonies, while those producing acid from lactose in general failed to reduce the salt and remained colorless or only faint pink. A bisphenol , 2 , 2 'methylenebisoe-chloro-0~is opropylphenol , added to a level of 0.001 percent in the plating medium .0 a r t I I . ... . .' ‘W e a ‘ ‘ ,1 o . 4 . .u e ‘ . -.' ‘ \' ' u g - ' O a ‘ . a . . ~ . . s , u I ' O . .' . . I ’ a o . g ' C - _ . e . . . l , . 0 It ‘ O ‘ ' ‘ a . . , e e . , - ‘ . . . ‘ c . a v s ,. . . w . v .1 t - e t. - . ' ' v' as x - _ . ' ‘ . ‘ . .c ,' a ‘ . a ‘ 1' ' ‘7 a I . ' O ‘ A ‘ ‘ I ' x .. . v . . ' I ' . I . I ,. ‘ e v. _ ea . . \- . ' . ‘ . p , ~ ' . - o - I . - . . ' O , Q -- g a D .. .‘- . . A .l. I 1 . ‘ I . e ~ ‘ ‘ . . ' ‘ . . _ - , . a ‘ ' e ‘ . ‘ t s I ' . ‘ e . . t - c e - ' / . t O . l ‘ , ‘ ' ‘ :, _ . o-~ . , . . I .. H e l -' ' \ 5 . a . ”I .. - a I. . I ‘ .h. ‘ ‘- g . i . . a . ' - I ., e '. b I ' ,9 . oi . 0 t s V a in . R . 'J‘ .1 ~ . . . . i ,I . 2’: . - ' t A o a— n I. ,- -. e 1‘ " . I o . C . ‘ 0 A . n ' I . ‘ . . . . . ' . » ‘I I ‘a‘ J c ' 0.1 ' . ' . t. , . c' . A . O-v .- . ‘ . ‘ . ‘ . e‘ _ ’ . ‘ H ‘ . . . , a 1 o . ‘ e l . . . '. e - ' «- J ' ' e ' a . . 1 O In . . . .t - ' 3 . ‘ e . a Q ' ‘ . t . e ’ I 5 Dale Emil Bordt effectively inhibited certain gram positive cocci which sur- vived penicillin exposure. A series of human fecal specimens was examined to deter- mine whether this penicillin enrichment technique could be used for the isolation of salmonellae from.feces. The results of this limited series of examinations compare favorably with those obtained with several media presently used for routine diagnostic work. Among the limitations of the method is the fact that certain organisms other than the salmonellae do survive ex- posure to penicillin and, when present in large numbers, pro- duce overcrowded plates making isolation of typical colonies difficult. Organisms involved in this type of interference are (l) pseudo-chads, (2) nutritionally deficient coliforms, (3) lactose non~fermenting or slow fermenting coliforms. Other. limitations are the inability to recover quantitatively the salmonellae, and the relatively small inoculum.necessary. The method, with some modifications, could also be very convenient for isolation of naturally occurring biochemically deficient forms of bacteria. loung, E.G., R.W. Begg and E.I. Pants. Inorganic nutrient requirements of‘ggghgzighigwpgli. Arch. Biochem. 5:121- 130. 1944. THE INFLUENCE OF SEVERAL FACTORS ON THE ACTION Oi" PENICILLIN AGAIIS! SOME MEMBERS OF THE ENTEROBAOTERIACEAE By Dale mi Bordt A THESIS Submitted to the School of Graduate Studies of Inchigen State university of Agriculture and Applied Science in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Department of lflcrobiclogy and Public Health 1966 AOKNOWLEDGMENTB The author wishes to express his appreciation for the able guidance and advice given to him throughout his entire graduate career by Dr. LL. Mallmann, Professor of Bacter- iclogy and Public Health. Sincere thanks to Ir. HJ. Cope and Miss Margaret Murphy of the Michigan Department of Health at Lansing for linking available the fecal specimens used in this study. Thanks also to Pr. William Ferguson and 1m. William Geldwell of the Salmonella Typing Station of the Michigan Department of Health for generously agreeing to type sero- logically the salmonellae isolated in this investigation. In. TABLE OF OONTH‘ITS INTEODUCTION .00...COOOQOQO0......OQOCOOOOCOOOOO00....0.. PURPOSE OF THE STUDY .o...’............................... THEORETICAL CONSIDERATIONS .............................. DETERMNATION OF TIE EFFECTS OF ' SEVERAL FACTORS 0N PENICILLIN ACTION eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee. DEVELOPMENT OF A DIFFERE‘ITIAL PLATING MEDIUM FOR DISTINGUISHING THE SALMONELLAE FROM COLIFORM BACTERIA" use or TEE PENICILLIN micm'r TECHNIQUE FOR THE I$OLATION OF SALMONELLA! FROM NATURALLY INFECTED m PEGAL SPECIMENS .0.0...OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO0.. SMARY eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee p 15 '72 86 97 CONCLUSIONS eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee 101 “TRIALS USED eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee 1-03 LITmTURE CITED deeeeeeeeeeeeoeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee 104 eeoeel'ee'oeesee00ca..-.-eoo ' eoeedoeceeeeeedeelc ' ...‘....ge"’ . »_ . eeeeeeeeeeeoewevooeeeevoeseesee. e.assesses-sosees-eetseeeese ' -' Ole-sewersono-Onovfieofloo'- - LIST 01' TABLES The effect of varying the lactose concen- tration on the initial growth of L 39;; in‘IBPIn.d1nnoeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee The residual bactericidal effect of pani- eillin on Q‘ W after reduction of ' P.310illin concentration by dilution..ooo..... The potency of Bacte-penase Concentrate assayed against penicillin G potassium........ -. Determination of the amount of penase necessary for quantitative recovery of % P209 which has been exposed to 0 uni s of penicillin per ml in 0.85 DOPOGIO 3‘11n.eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee The amount cf penase required for a quan- titative recovery of s o from 10 minutes exposure to 355' un ts o peni- cillin per ml in 0.85 percent saline.......... The bactericidal effect of 800 units of penicillin per ml on 003.1 in IE? me- dium with 0.25 percen lactose at 37 0........ The efficiency of hill of 393,; by 300 units of penicillin per as influenced by length of pre-incubati on and penicillin exposure time in YBP medium containing 0.35 PQIOODt lao‘oseeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee The influence of pre-incubation time on the hill of fizggl; by 300 units of pmicillin per ml in medium containing 0.25 per0 cent IQOOOICeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeseeeeeeeeeeee nae effect of exposure time on the kill of L, .9211. by 800 units of penicillin per ml after a six hour pre-incubation in IBP me- dium containing 0.85 percent lactose.......... Page 17 21 87 29 51 33 35 38 , '. . . - I .~ .Oe‘l-eeo.'hooO-ese.¢o.\000e1.... . I - 'k . ' ' . e - ..i. ‘ . n I. ’ «cacao-.0. . - - . I ‘ ' , -. ‘. - . .. s . . a. O ’0 e ‘ e ‘ 1 ".. Uiuenl00 . b - ' t , ' v.' u . .7 e I ‘ i . ' ‘ I _ e. .e ‘ I . . . _.,'. 1 ' . .‘ . I.. \ ' es‘eOoeeeede-oe OAIODO‘IOVOOIIC.‘ -. e . . . 'e “ a " . oeevrl."I.-.e -.: , . n ' I ‘.' < .' "-.\ ,e .. v .A-‘ . ‘n . 'Ul..~0'.'a- . - - e. _ .- . T l . t.. ' ..‘ Ie‘ . ., \‘ ' u ‘ a ‘ ‘ - ts ‘ I h v ' .. '008‘... ' 0 0' . . I -_.- . .' x, . '.- O . . a. .-.. ’ I '~ a. A ' D . . . ‘ ,' L ’.’ l . . ,. ,. . , . . '. t . ee-eeaeeoeedfltlsefivvttest. .1 '- O I ' ~ - n. " ." ' w - .. ‘ v ~ ‘, ' O ‘ Y ‘. O V .' s . ‘ A A .l- '0. . I'l ' fl ' ..es..eole‘ae 'lwo-eOQf-OUhIOt'IIOQI. "‘ n 1 . e.- ‘. a ..‘ ' ,e .. ‘. . u ' ‘ . A "I . . t ' . o ‘ a‘ ' .. 000000.00. Table P380 10 The recovery of §_., 2%20f3! from exposure to 800 units of pen ci in per ml at 3'7 0 in YEP medium containing 0.25 percent lac- tOCCQeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeseseeseeeeeeseeseeeeee 40 ll Recovery of §_._ gallery? from exposure to 300 units Of P31110111 I after a prelimi- nary 18-hour incubation in 0.85 percent Bfilin. It 57 Cseeeeeeeeeeeeseeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee ‘2 12 The effect of one parent sterile faces on the survival of L 2233.923? after ex- posure to 200 units of penici in per ml 1‘»YEP3-‘diumeesseeeeeeseeeeeeeeeeeessssoseese 45 13 The selectively inhibitory preperty of sodium arsenate and sodium arsenite on f; sell "mtg. new in untou- a as otOlO bro OOOOOOOOeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee 48 la The effect of various concentrations of sodium arsenite on viability and growth of L 2211, in tryptose-lactose broth at 37 0............. 50 lit The effect of various concentrations of sodium arsenite on viability and growth of ESQ-$2M in tryptcse-laotose broth .33? OOeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee 51 15 The effect of 0.01 percent sodium srsenite on the growth of several members of the We 1n tryptose-laotosc 30thesseseeeeeseeeeeeeeeseeeeeeeeeeeeeeseeeee 53 la The effect of 0.01 percent sodium arsenite on penicillin action against _§,_ {#133133 and 1., 2934. in tryptose-lactose oth......... 55 17 The effect of various concentrations of .scdium arsenite on growth and survival of fig. W in YEP medium plus 0.25 par- - OOBt 1‘°t°.eeOeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee 57 (OOOVO. cadets-l ’ e . s . ‘ . . . w . ' ' . .. e .s-elea ‘s-eoo vdeet-e-OOOCOO ’Os . - , eIIOOCIOOJOOOUJ ad‘soe‘ s .seeeeeeeseo 00...... Cones... . 7 J I \ ..o I lcn' I n I I... O . . . cease. s Q C . -.-. f OO'OODOICOO O 0 | . . . - .r . U 0 AI . .5 . ' v0 i s I' s a . .. 4‘ O . $1 \ v k. ..I y . . . C 4. . . . e Table Page 18 The influence of 0.002 percent sodium ar- senite on recovery of §,. pullogum from exposure to 200 units of penicillin per ml in IBP medium with 0.25 percent lac- toss and approximatelylm percent sterile rm.OOOOOOOOQOOOOOOOCOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO 60 19 The effect of two concentrations of sodium arsenite on the growth of g... coli in YEP ’ medium plus 0.25 percent lactose.............. 63 80 The effect of varying penase concentrations and incubation times on recovery of §_,_ 231- from exposure to 1,000 units of penio c n contained in five ml of YBP medium..... 64 21 The influence of the nature of the plating medium on the recovery of S pugcgum ' from penicillin exposure...................... 69 23 The recovery of several Salmonella species from exposure to penicim medium..... 71 23 The effect of tryptose concentration in the plating medium on recovery of S “13%;," cm from exposure to penicillin in'YB dium um..... 76 24 The effect of cysteine and sodium thic- glyccllate on the recovery of §_,. W from.pon101111n exposure...................... 80 35 The development of W in the ' presence of sodium auryl sulfate and 3975‘3eeeseeeeseeeeeeeeeeeeeeseeseeeeeeeeeeese 8‘ 86 Results of the examination of fecal speci- mens for salmonellae by the penicillin en- richment technique and by four currently OIfllOYOQ diagnostic media..................... 89 8'7 mm: reactions of ccliform strains which dc not grow in YBP medium plus lactose and which survived penicillin exposure in thifl ‘Ddiumeeeeeeseeeeseeeeeeeeeeseeeeeeeeesso 95 ’ J . . .esuueqseselaeebaeiteoebed- . . . e . ' ' ‘ ‘ . . . , ‘ . ...A .I o'e000-OIb-olm -' O '- 0 s " 0 e ‘ . ' .\ '. .w." - e C e . ' ‘, . .0'0'.sv' ' . . a .' -. . - D I ' 0'. .‘ eeeeeeeepotouie Q ooeeess . I 4' e bode- A _ l, . . , . . . . , s -e . Q . . ..-s. ... on... " " ‘ 1' . I e l .0 .V . . . . . . ' e ‘ .« . .. . . «Ct-ceocmoudob dcvs. .e ‘- ' - .. . Q. . s ‘ «vi-v ‘ eeeee*.ueOeeOeOees-e¢wos0seoeuoooeqoce. eaohdeceeeeeee~oocsvi ooeo\.o.e‘-0600eedebeeesse-OOIOOeeOQ 9.0.0.0.... ‘0. INTRODUCTION flaming (1929) made the historic observation that a filtrate of a figpicilligg culture showed a remrkable se- lective action against the gram positive bacteria in general, and a considerably lesser action against most gram negative organisms. He was the first to take practical advantage of this fact by using penicillin in an agar medium to facil- itate the isolation of W W ( a gram negative organism) from nasal washings which also contained. an abun- dance of gram positive microorganisms. lucLaan (1937) also applied this same principle with marked success for the isolation of Hemophilgs pggtussis from whooping cough cases. Pissi (1945) reported the use of penicillin in a me- dium for the cultivation of Trjpanosoma org; . The peni- cillin is nontoxic to the protozoan while inhibiting the growth of bacteria. Burnet, Stone, and Anderson (1946) made use of a com- bination of sulfonamide and penicillin for the isolation of the virus of influenza B in chick embryos during an epidemic of influenza in Australia. The penicillin and sulfcnamide were effective in inhibiting growth of bacteria in the chick amnion, and sufficiently nontoxic to the embryo and the virus to allow invasion by and development of the virus to take place.- Hawking (1946) used ten units of penicillin per ml in a tissue culture of chicken macrophage reticulc-endcthelial sells for the isolation and growth of nasmodigg gelictggp. Lacy (1946) utilized the selective action of penicillin for the isolation of Egggella apogtgg from.milk. llcrin and Turcctte (1946) used penicillin for the bio- logical “purification" of vaccine emulsions. These authors point out that 50 units of penicillin per ml of vaccine pre- vented bacterial infection by vaccination without adversely affecting the immunological potency of the vaccinia virus. Dishes (1947) reported the use of penicillin for the isolation of pleuropneumcnia-like organisms frombpathc- logical specimens. Bowitt and Barnett (1948), working with poliomyelitis virus, report that the use of 1,000 units of penicillin and 20 mg of streptomycin per md.of fecal suspension.made intra- abdcmdnal inoculation of monkeys possible without preventing paralysis. " Framer, flouhannes and chotzkie (1950) developed a method for the quantitative recovery of mycobasteria from sewage. They used Dubcs' medium plus five units of peni- cillin and 50 units of grisein per ml. They also pre- heated the sewage sample at 50 0 for 60 minutes. This_ treatment was reported to suppress sv-oe percent of sewage organisms with.no loss of‘lyggpgggggigg,tubgggglgsis. Iheae papers are cited to give examples of the wide use of penicillin in the isolation or biological "puri- fication' of selected organisms. They are by_no means the only cases reported of the use of penicillin for this purpose. Penicillin and other antibiotics are used rou- tinely in virus laboratories as a practical means of pre- venting bacterial infection of laboratory animals or chick embryos by bacterial contaminants in virus preparations. In all of the mentioned procedures advantage is taken of the natural ability of certain organisms (such as viruses, protozoa and most gram negative bacteria) to resist the lethal action of a given concentration of penicillin. Under the same conditions, contamunents are killed or inhibited due to their natural penicillin sensitivity. Hobby, lbyer, and Ohaffes (l942), studing the mechanism of action of penicillin on pneumocoeci, homelytic strep? tocoeoi and staphylococci, concluded that penicillin is bactericidal under certain conditions. They found the rate .of killing by penicillin to vary with different organisms, and also that penicillin appears to be effective only when (I active multiplication of the exposed organisms takes place. roster and Iilker (1945), in a study of penicillin effects 03.W W mm, found that survival from.penicillin exposure was not due primarily to highly resistant fipersisters". 0n the contrary, cultures from.surviving cells were found to have survival curves identical with the parent culture. They conclude that peni- cillin depends for its activity on the logarithmic prolong- ation of generation time. This suggests also that the sur- vival was due to some special metabolic state of the cell at the time of exposure. Bigger (19dd) lent additional support to the hypothesis that only growing, or at least actively metabolizing cells are susceptible to the lethal action of penicillin. He found that by using a dilute solution of boric acid as a bacteriostat fcr‘lgnggggus, the action of penicillin could be inhibited. lobby and Dawson (1944e,b) worked along similar lines. they showed that an increase in growth rate of hemolytic streptococci caused an increased rate of kill by penicillin. conditions which decreased growth rate also decreased the rate at which penicillin acted. In addition, these workers observed that sulfadiasine, which inhibits growth, also, inhibits penicillin action. It was also found that at d 0, . a I! s . . . J . It . . . I . . d . e . . .i see . s . . . s e i . w i w. a . a c . s . . s . a . r a s . . . . Q . w ¢ . 1' i a. e . . . . a . o 0 e I w . . m . i V .. .a n at. s . a I . u o . i v . s . . b . . O . e u D . x r o . e i . v . , . l u. n s . s . e . F. . . . . . l s i . . . . a a i I .. . e s a . J . . a i s .a a n C . . o . a J . l L .. . s. a . u 1 . . . O . 3 a e . . e s so . s n ‘ a i . i e . . . e . c I i . i C . a u u I O . . . .a t e . . o a Q‘. penicillin action, as well as growth, was stopped or greatly retarded. Lee, Ioley, and Epstein (1944), working with Staphylo- . m 9.9.33.9. m, came to the following conclusions: .1. on. rate of kill by penicillin is greater in a medium.where normally the growth rate is greater. 2. Physiologically young organisms are killed quicker than old ones. This was believed to be due to the shorter lag.involved. .Ihsse workers also_showed that greatly increasing the concentration of penicillin did not appreciably shorten the time required to kill all the organisms in a suspension. They showed a linear relationship during logarithmic growth between the logarithm.of the viable population found in the control tubes and the logarithm.of the number of viable cr- ’ ganisms in the presence of 1.5 units per ml of penicillin. (Their final conclusion also is that actual growth of the organism.seems to be necessary for penicillin to kill. Rants and Kirby (1944), in their, in 2.1.22.9. studies on the action of penicillin on staphylococci, observed that, in order to establish the penicillin effect, the organisms apparently must divide. They also confirm.the observation _by roster and lilker (1943) that the bacteria remaining viable after exposure to penicillin are in general as sen- sitive to penicillin action as the parent strain. fhese workers interpret this to mean that survival is not due to an artificially induced penicillin resistance, but it is due merely to the fact that the surviving organisms were not in a metabolic state suitable for ditision to take place. Schwartnman (1944), in studying the affect of peni- cillin on Esghggigahig mi, showed that methionine enhances (the action of penicillin; and he also states that substances inhibitory to growth interfere with penicillin action. chain and Duthie (1945) came to the conclusion that penicillin acts as a bactericstatic or bactericidal agent .depending on concentration._ These effects_occur only under ,conditions that will allow for bacterial growth in the absence of penicillin. In a medium where growth is nutritionally impossible, penicillin is ineffective. They also observed that bacteriostatio concentrations of helvolic acid inter- fare with the action of penicillin on.lL_gQ:§ng, 0n the other hand, Traffers (1946) found that inhibi- tcry agents like iodcaoetic acid,sodium.azide, gentian violet and.merthiolatc potentiate the inhibitory action of penicillin. He postulates this potentiating effect to be due to these agents affecting a part or all of a common enzyme.syatem. Dufrenouy, Strait, and Pratt (1947) studied the effect of penicillin on 5,, col}, flgteus W, gt serene and Egagllgg,§ngjlllg, is a result of these studies they came to the conclusion that penicillin affects both gram.negative and grem.positive organisms in essentially the some manner. the threshold concentration necessary for lethal action appears to be the only major difference between the two groups. Krampits and‘werkman (1947) showed that penicillin had no deleterious effect on the metabolism of glucose by 3,, am, “and also that it had no affection the enzymes concerned with the intermediate products of carbohydrate breakdown. In a synthetic medium, in the absence of penicillin, a gradual acceleration of oxygen uptake would occur after about five hours. In the presence of penicillin this acceleration of oxygen uptake did not occur. Control experiments showed the same accelerated uptake to occur with cells in a buffer sol- ntion without carbohydrate substrate. The substances being oxidised were evidently constitutents of the cells. During the course of rapid endogenous activity, pentose disappeared. The presence of penicillin inhibits this disappearance. these (workers_ere of the opinion that the source of pentcse is the ribose of ribose nucleic acid. .rhsy conclude that in some manner, penicillin interferes withf”t"he dissimilation of ribose nucleic acid and consequently with its assimilation '4 during growth. lagle and lhsselman (1949) made the observation.that beta hemolytic streptococci, when exposed to penicillin in e mediun.favorable for growth, did not resume growth.immed- ,iately after addition of the penicillin destroying enzyme penase, but the organisms showed a slow recovery time. This time of recovery was directly related to the time of ex- posure._ They also noted that large doses. up to 10,000 times necessary for inhibition, did not further accelerate bacterial death. On the contrary, in some cases such large doses even retarded lethal action. These workers also ob- served that when cells were exposed to penicillin in a me- diam.unfavcrable for growth and were then placed in‘a favor» able medium. they did not require the recovery period neces- sary fcr cells which had been exposed in a favorable me- dium. Their conclusions, drawn about the action of penicillin, are as follows: "The Bactericidal action of penicillin may thus depend on the continuation, in a favorable medium, of certain.metabolic activities in the cells in which the pro- cesses which normally lead to growth and cell division have been interrupted by penicillin." This is in agreement with the conclusions of Krampits and lerkman (1947) previously cited. It was also noted that cells thus altered by peni- cillin exposure in a medium favorable for growth are able ms - . I‘ s .e. . . . 5s .. A .. s r o t e . L l .w A . . . e o O . . e e . t ‘e .. to recover from this exposure only in.a msdium.favorable for growth. stis_(l948). and Lederberg and Zinder (1948) simul- taneously reported the possibility of using penicillin for the isolation of biochemically deficient mutants of bac- teria. These were the first two deliberate and practical applications of the previously discussed phenomenon that penicillin kills bacteria only when in a medium.favorable for growth. The technique of Davis (1948), using gh,gg;;, was in general the following: A suspension.of ghpggli,was ir- radiated with ultra-violet light to induce mutation. The cells were then incubated in a complete mediun.to allow the surviving ones to multiply. The sells were then washed with.saline and placed in a minimal medium in the absence of tryptophane. After that they were exposed to 300 units of penicillin.per:sl for 84 hours. The cells were removed and plated on a complete medium. A high proportion of the colonies which then developed were found to be made up_of sells requiring tryptophane for growth. These mutants, when exposed to penicillin in a complete medium, show no increased natural resistance to the antibiotic. It is apparent, then, that the surviving cells resisted the peni- cillin exposure because they were exposed in a meter lO bclically inactive state. This inactive state of the cells was due to the inability of the deficient mmdium.to support their growth. aincc these original observations, many other workers have also used this approach for the isolation of bacterial mutants. 11 .PUIPOSI or THE STUDY ihe apparent success of the 'penicillin enrichment tech- nique? prompted the present investigation. It was considered worthewhile to investigate the possibility of using this unique action of penicillin for the selection of bacteria frml maxed populations containing closely related types. l_classical example of this type of situation_involves the isolation of members of the genus lemgggl g from.fecal material containing large numbers of other members of the Inlgzghsgfigzlgggsgl Iith this object in mind, the influence of several factors on the penicillin susceptibility of coli- form.bacteria and various members of the genus figlmonellg was chosen as the primary object of this study. the main portion of this work will be concerned with the investigation of the effects of various conditions in a medium.which.modify the action of penicillin on representse tive members of the coliform.group and the genus §glmonella. The two organisms chosen for the initial portion of the study were; (1) A typical strain of !h_ggli freshly isolated from human.feces. (2) s strain of Salmgnella pullggug freshly isolated 13 free chicken feces. fih,pgglogum.was chosen to represent the genusIfigi; plgngllg,because it is one of the least resistant of the salmonellae to the action of penicillin. Thomas and Levine (1945) shoved that as little as 10 units per ml inhibited growth in beef extract broth. Also, §_‘ pullorum is considered not to be highly pathogenic for man, which minimises the danger of accidental infection while counting colonies on plates, etc. in the laboratory. 13 IEEORETIGAL.CONSIDERATIONS decording to the studies on the mode of action of penie cillin previously cited, the following conditions must be met in order to obtain the desired selective hill of the colifcrns: ‘ 1. Conditions must be formulated which are favorable for the growth of the coliforms. Ibo presence of peni‘ .cillin in sufficient concentration should then be bacteri- cidal to this group. 2. These conditions must at the same time be such that members of the genus leggngllg, which may be present, will not be able to initiate growth; but will, nevertheless, remain viable in a metabolically inactive state. In order to attain such conditions, physiological dire . ferences between the two groups of organisms were considered. the outstanding difference appears to be the ability of the coliforns to utilise lactose as a source of carbon in an otherwise inorganic medium, and the inability of members of the genus W to do so. .. On this basis, then, a synthetic medium with lactose as the sole carbon source was considered adequate to fulfill I. 14 the necessary requirements. A medium.0f this type is that described by Ybung, Begg, and Pentz (1944). In an intensive study of the nutrient requirements at linggli, these authors found the optimum.inorganic require- ments to be the following: seal ............................... 0.5% (N34)330‘ .......................... 0.5% _rrzrt, ............................. 0.2% legato. ............................ 0.2% In ................................._0.515per ml 1‘6 ................................. 0.56Vrer 1.111 In the present study the magnesium.was supplied in the form or1ugsc¢ovnao (0.005 grams per liter) and the iron in the form.opreSd‘-7820 (0.00278 grams per liter). The pH of this inorganic base medium.after autoclaving isde 0.5. The anthers found that this base medium plus 3.0 percent glycerol supported the growth of g‘flggli as well as did nutrient broth, except that a longer lag period was observed. this inorganic base medium.was dispensed in 50 ml amounts in 125 ml flasks and sterilized by eutoclaving for 10 minutes at 121 G. Lactose, as the sole carbon source, was added asep- tioally from.a simdlarly autoclaved solution prior to in- oculation to give the desired final concentration, I I Q. o . s - ‘1 e ‘ s e~ceseeeetaeoeeesreooe v6.0..‘0‘zteabee. '\- " .o‘ee-«eueeeeeee.oee '.' osteeoeDOOOsOOOOOc-O .. 15 hummus-Ion or; ran more or 33mm ' reasons on PENICILLIN ACTION the first consideration in this study was to determine the conditions necessary for the optimum lethal effect of penicillin on.§h_gg;;,in the synthetic mediun.of Young, Begg, and Pants (1944). for convenience this msdium.will here- after be rarer-red to as mar medium. from.the evidence obtained by the work of the several authors quoted previously, conditions optimum.for nest rapid initial growth of §h_gg;i should also be optimum for peni- cillin action against this organism. Ebbby, Mbyer and Ghaffee (19e2); nigger (1944); Hobby and Dawson (1944); Lee, Foley, and Epstein (1944); Rants and Kirby (1944); Schwartsman (1944); Chain and Duthie (1945); Dufrenouy, strait and Pratt (1947); ' Irampits and workman (1947); lagle and mseelman (1949). ' EIEBRIMENT I. netermination of the Optimum.concentration of Lactose in HP “than for the minimum Lag of 5,, 29.1.10 _.§:ocggurez fifty n1 quantities of YBP'medium.containing ,verying concentrations of lactose were prepared and seeded with 0.5 ml of a 1-200,000 dilution of a 24shour brain heart -.- 16 infusion broth culture of gh,ggli, Duplicate onerml quan- tities were plated in brain heart infusion agar at hourly intervals. After a 24-hour incubation period, the colonies were counted and recorded as in Table 1. The incubation temperature was 37 0. W3, As can be seen in Table l, the optimum con- centration of lactose for shortest lag of 3h,ggli,is from 0.25 to 0.5 percent. these results also show that the length of leg at the optimum.lactose concentration is approximately five to six hours. Before an attempt was made to demonstrate the bacteri- cidal action of penicillin against A 39],; in this medium, a consideration of the concentration of penicillin which must be used was necessary. homes and Levine (1945) studied the in m effects of_penieillin on various intestinal bacteria and found that the order of sensitivity was as follows: ,Salmonella, W. 2121231.. W. Woh 0 is. and Lergbacter. lbst lfighgnighig_strains required from.50 to 100 units per ml for complete inhibition in beef extract broth, while 1,, W and L, 832529.21. usually required over 100 units ,per ml for_inhibition. On this basis then, a concentration of 200 units per ml was chosen to insure kill of even the an. ' I. C v ,. e 17 TABLE 1 The Effect of Varying the Lactose Concentration on the Initial Growth of L 0011 in YBP lediml A _L w— VV. vvr fasten;w ’ _ fl?" . H Concentration (f) 0.1 0.25 0.5 1.0 2.5 Es .m'aftei? ‘ A # “ f seeding 0 17,000* 18,000 17,500 f 18,100 +_ 16,000 1 17,400 17,800 18,000 .17,300 17,400 2 €17,200, 718.300 ,17.200 18.900 18,000 3 18,000 20,100 20,300 20,500 17,800 ,4 31,000 _46,000 44,000 32,000 21,400 5 63,000 84,000 ,78,000 48,000 24,300 a 74,000 123,000 119,000 38,000 77,000 W‘W" i. * average count per ml _' he. I! Q 8 18 .Iore resistant coliform strains. The use of such a relatively high concentration of penicillin is further justified by the work of Iagle and Mhsselman (1949), who showed that large doses of penicillin, even up to 10,000 times that necessary for inhibition, did not accelerate bacterial death. The next logical step in this investigation was to dee termine the bactericidal activity of penicillin against 15‘ m; in YBP medium. Before this could be determined, however, some means had to be devised to reduce the residual penicillin concentration below the threshold value for the organism prior to plating. ‘ fwo theoretically possible methods to accomplish this presented themselves: (1) the penicillin could be diluted beyond the three: hold concentration before plating. (8) The penicillin could be destroyed by incubation in the presence of a sufficient amount of a penicillinvdestroyirg 332339! apicer and Blitz (1948), working with_§t;eptocgccus xgzi:' 333;, showed that when'penicillin was removed by dilution, no colonies developed upon plating the cells in an agar me- dium. than the penicillin was removed by sufficient penis cillinase, however, the exposed organisms regained their viability and developed colonies in agar poured plates. The 19 reason for the cells failure to regain viability after peni- cillin removal by dilution is indicated by the work of less and Johnson (1949). These authors, using radioactive penis cillin, showed a specific uptake of penicillin by suscepe tible cells independent of the extracellular concentration. this penicillin was not removable by dilution, and could be rcsponsible.for the residual effect after dilution of the antibiotic in the suspending medium beyond the threshold level for the organism.in question. s-It-was desired to determine whether this residual effect is also ‘Operativc in the ease of §_,. mm. To determine this the following was done: EXPERIMENT II. The Effect of Removal of Penicillin by Dilution on the Recovery of i W. _ ..2:29.911m8 s 1-100,000 dilution of a 24-hour culture are, W was prepared in 0.85 percent saline. Peni- cillin was added to a level of 200 units per ml. After 10 minutes this suspension was diluted 1-100 in saline and plated in duplicate in 10 ml of brain heart infusion agar. this gave a final concentration of 0.8 units per.ml in the agar plate, which is far below the threshold concentration of about 10 units per ml for §_, w (Levine 1945). After 84-hours incubation, no colonies developed, as can be 20 seen from.!able 2. The control showed no loss of viability in the saline during this short exposure, nor did 0.2 units of penicillin per ml in the agar medium prove inhibitory to cells not previously exposed to the higher concentration of [the antibiotic. On the basis of this evidence it is apparent that dilution could not be the method to use for the removal of penicillin for recovery of §,.pu;;grg§u These findings are also in agreement with those of Spioer and Blits (1948). .The other alternative, as indicated by these same aue thors, involves the enzymatic inactivation of penicillin by the enzyme penicillinase. Abraham.and Chain (1940) were the first to report the existence of a bacterial enzyme capable of destroying penis cillin.. They showed that various bacterial extracts and culture filtrates destroyed penicillin with varying degrees of effectiveness. Hobby, Meyer and Ghaffee (1942) also confirmed the pro- duction of a penicillinase by a strain ofwgpwggli. Lawrence (1943), in an attempt to devise a sterility test for penicillin preparations, showed that takadiastase and clarsse were effective in destroying penicillin. Later, however, Lawrence (1944) reported that the active penicillin destroying substances in clarase were certain filterable substances of bacterial origin. These bacteria were identified 21 TABLE 3 The Residual Bactericidal Effect of Penicillin on §h_ c after Reduction of Penicillin Concentration by Dilution Control - count per.ml before penicillin exposure. 9,600 A.— v“— Oount after 10 min. exposure to 800 units of penicillin per ml. Penicillin reduced to 0.2 units per ml by diluting 1-100 and plating 0 one ml in 10 ml of brain heart infusion agar. “A fivw -w-w '7 WV 7w. —v—v 71 Control - count per ml. No initial exposure to penicillin, but plated in brain heart infusion agar ccn- 10,500 taining 0.2 units of penicillin per ml. 22 by him.ss belonging to the figsillus cereus type which were present as contaminants in some olarase preparations. loodruff and Foster (1945) made a rather intensive study of a bacterial penicillinase preparation.. These workers found that penicillinase is destroyed rapidly by temperatures above 50 0, but that it is quite stable at 4 0. In addition, they found that the preparation was stable over a remarkably wide pH range of from.3.0 to 11.0, with an optimum.activity of from.6.5 to 8.0. It was also found that penicillinase activity was maximum.at 37 0, and that sarcontaining comp pounds such as sodium.thioglycollate and cysteine enhanced its activity. These authors also found that penicillinase activity is not limited to bacteria, but that certain yeasts, aetinomycetes and other fungi show it to varying degrees. Beets-penase concentrate, a product of the Difco Come pany of Detroit, Michigan was used here. lccording to the manufacturers, one ml of penase concentrate is capable of inactivating 500,000 units of penicillin in two hours when incubated together in 15 ml of fluid thioglycollate mwdium or brain heart infusion broth at room.tempereture. Different lots of penicillin and penase are apt to vary slightly in potency. Therefore, it was considered necessary to assay the potency of this particular lot of penase with the lot of penicillin used in order to express the penase II potency in terms of the penicillin used. EPEBIMENT III. The Assay of Bacto-penase Concentrate Carried Out according to the Procedure Outlined in the Difco manual (ninth edition), 1955. ' - ,zzggggugg; Dilutions of Bacto-penass Concentrate of 1-2, 1-5, 1-4, 1-5, 1-6, 1-7, 1-8, 1-9, and 1-10 were pre- pared in sterile distilled water. One ml of each dilution was added to a series of test tubes containing 15 ml of Bacte- rluid Thicglycollats medium. One ml of a solution of peni- cillin containing 50,000 units per ml was added to each tube and allowed to remain at room.temperature for two hours. lash tube was then inoculated with one ml of a 1-1.000 di- lution of a 24-hour broth culture of !k_pyogengs Egggpgurggg P809, and incubated at 37 0 for 24 hours. The highest_ dilution permitting growth in this period was detarmdned, and this dilution of haste-penase Concentrate was multiplied by 50,000 to determine its potency in terms of the number of units of penicillin inactivated by one ml of the enzyme pre- paration. The results of this assay are given in Table 3. , ‘ Eiscgssiog: from these results it is evident that 300,000 units of penicillin can be inactivated by one ml of penase in two hours_st room temperature. The potency than is 350,000 ”units" per m1. 24 TABLE 3 The Potency or Bacto-penase concentrate Aesayed Against Penicillin 0 Potassium *— v w “7 “WV fi— ‘__— *7 v- m lube lumber Bacto-penese Turbidity after dilution . 24 hours 1‘ 1-2 } 2 1-3 } 3 1-4 I 4 1-5 / 5 1-0 } a 1-7 I 7 1-3 . 8 1-9 - 9 1-10 - W W ’1' W W ‘7... ' lash tube contained 50,000 units or penicillin per :1. 35 It must be recognized that in the assay of penase, the susceptible bacteria were added to the assay tubes after peni- cillin inactivation. In actual sterility-testing procedures, or in procedures designed to recover bacteria after penicillin exposure, a very different situation exists. That is, the bacterial cells are in contact with penicillin before the addi- tion of penase, and remain so during the entire inactivation procedure. 'It was considered important, therefore, to determine whether the concentration of penase adequate for inactivation of a given amount of penicillin will also be adequate to al- 1cw for recovery of susceptible cells which had been pre- viously exposed to the penicillin for a short time. EXPIRIIINT IV. Deterndnation of the amount of Penase necessary for Quantitative Recovery of 1h_gggggg P209, Exposed to zoo units of Penicillin.per ml in 0.85 Percent Saline. W: A 84-hour culture, of 3,, m P209 was diluted 1-10.000 in saline and 200 units of penicillin per ml were added. One-ml quantities were removed after 10 min- utes and placed in nine ml of saline, brain heart infusion broth and fluid thioglycollatc medium, containing various amounts of penase, After two hours at room.tempereture one- ml quantities were plated in brain heart infusion agar and 86 incubated for 84 hours at 37 0. The results are shown in Table d. W: These results show that a much higher con- centration of penase is necessary for the recovery of bac- teria from penicillin exposure than is necessary for the more inactivation of penicillin the same length of time. It is evident from these data that treatment with 200 in- activating units of penase for two hours is insufficient for recovery of ]h_au eus, exposed to 800 units of peni- . cillin in a medium.unfavorab1e for growth. A concentration as high as 35,000 inactivating units for four hours is necessary to cause quantitative recovery in the three media tested. brain heart infusion broth appears to be the most efficient medium.for penicillin inactivation. ‘However, since the counts after five hours inactivation in fluid thiogly- collate medium.and brain heart infusion broth exceeded the eount in the control tube, it is evident that comm recovery and multiplication occurred. The next experiment was designed to determine the con- centration of penase necessary for quantitative recovery of 1, 223-339—133 from a short exposure to 200 units of penicillin per ml in.a medium.unfavorable for growth. 27 Ha Hog cameo owsuoes * 0mm own cum mason 0 on naaaaos idem omiaonpsoo com o 0 com o o can 0 o e an o o own 0 o m o o m m o o n o o a o to o mason ma cad» soapspfipossH ooo.mm cow.m oom coo.mm oo«.m com ooo.mm oom.m com ononom no noon: endows cusaaoomaw moons codename osaasm sodps>apowna loans chasm ounce nanom smm.o nod sons salons onaanm snooeom mm.o on as non naaaaofimwm no moans com on vomomnm moon was moana.momm unease .2 ho unopooom opapsuapsssd you anoomoooz season we pssoa4 on» we soapssasuopon q Hum " I , ‘. I y .H I . y C I (‘a < ' ‘ Q . ‘ ‘ I | ‘ . . ‘ .a - . . ~ . c ' . ‘ p . ' \ A ' ‘ ‘ ' . . . . . v o . ‘ . ‘ a. . a . h ' . ‘ . I, . ‘ v C v r k . - ‘ . e ' I . . ‘ . A ' ‘ u . . . , J . . I ‘ . . I ' O . I . > I . . . . , , A . ~ 3 ‘ ~ I e ' .‘ I I c \ s . l ,. i' I .' ' . . e - e . - s - . .. . e ' .(“ . ‘ ‘l H ’ I . ’ . I . . u . l . . .‘ Q . ' ' ’ k I O . ' ' I ' . . ' . s ' v t . .7 f A . . v ‘ ‘ h . . . . a . a . ._ A . e 9 , i ‘ . '1 . ‘ e O . v o . . I ' . ‘ . Q a . I e I A ‘ A . - ‘ u. I ‘ ‘ e ' , . » A p ,. . '9 . u I‘ t ‘ ‘ . e ‘- >‘ I ' ‘7, . . . . ' 7 ‘ ~ .: , c .- - .- ‘ . g r . A . t e I ‘ . a h ‘ v I I I ' I § I I I ' K I H . . ~ , t . . . O . . - ' h I I ‘ h ' - . \. \ . . . - a . Q a - . -. . “ ' ‘ - ‘ . C ' t . I Q‘ . ’ . ’ . a v ‘ ‘ ' 99 cent triphenyltetrazclium.chloride to the plating medium resulted in colonies of diagnostic significance. Lactose nonofernenting organisms reduced the tetrazolium.salt and developed intensely red colonies. Those organisms which produced acid from lactose failed to reduce the salt or did so only very slightly and gave rise to colorless or faint pink colonies. In early attempts to utilise this penicillin enrichment technique for isolating salmonellae from.fecal material. it was noted that certain gram positive bacteria also survived the exposure and interfered with the efficiency of the dif- ferential medium by forming colonies indistinguishable from those of the salmonellae. The addition of 0.001 percent of a bisphenol, 2,8'methylenebie—a-chlorc-G-isOpropylphenol, to the plating medium successfully inhibited these forms. A series of human fecal samples was examined to deter- mine whether this penicillin enrichment technique could be used for the isolation of salmonellae from feces. Compara- tive results obtained indicate that the technique is work- able. !he result of this limited series of examinations re- veals a favorable comparison with several media presently used in routine diagnostic procedures. Among the limitations of the method is the fact that certain organisms other than the salmonellae survive the penicillin exposure, and when 100 initially present in very large numbers, these result in over- crowded plates which.makes isolation of typical colonies dif- ficult or impossible. The organisms involved in this type of interference are (l) Pseudompnas species, (2) nutritionally deficient coliforms. (3) lactose non-fermenting or slow fer- menting cclifarms. other limitations of the method are the lack of quantitative recovery of the salmonellae and the necessarily relatively small inoculum.used. In addition to its use in isolating salmonellae from fecal material, this penicillin enrichment technique with modifications might also be used for the isolation of bio- chemically deficient forms of bacteria from.nature. 101 CONCLUSIONS 1. 200 units of penicillin per ml was bactericidal for 35, .qg;i in.a synthetic medium with lactose as a carbon source. 2. Penicillin was most actively bactericidal when exposure of the cells took place after the lag phase of growth had been passed and the organisms had begun to divide. 3. Dilution was not an effective means for reduction of peni- cillin concentration where recovery of previously emposed cells was desired. 4. A proper concentration of penicillinase did destroy peni- cillin effectively and allowed subsequent recovery and growth of cells previously exposed to the antibiotic. 5. g... M was found to survive exposure to 200 units of penicillin per ml when in a synthetic medium.where growth was nutritionally impossible. 6. Sodium.arsenite in a concentration of 0.002 percent was found to be selectively bacteriostatie against various sal- monellae. this bacteriostatic action of sodium.arsenite also tended to protect salmonellae from.the action of penicillin. 7. Members of the genus §glmgpglla,were successfully isolated from.infccted fecal material by this selective action of peni- 102 cillin against growing cells. 8. the addition of two percent tryptose and 0.02 percent cysteine to the final plating medium.increased the percent recovery of _s_. W from penicillin action. 9. The presence of 0.5 percent lactose and 0.005 percent triphenyltetrasolium.chloride in the plating medium.resulted in the development of dark red salmonella colonies and light pink or colorless coliform.solonies. lO. a concentration of 0.01 percent 2,2'methylenebis-4-chlorc- Fiscprcpylphenol in the plating medium inhibited gram positive fecal organisms which survived penicillin exposure. 11. This ”penicillin enrichment” technique compared favorably in efficiency with media currently employed for isolation of salmonellae from.fecal material. 103 mm ILLS USED menium Sulfate (mass. C.P. Beets Lactose ’ ' Dectc Penase Concentrate. Control lumber 424.0“ Bactc Tryptcse ferrous Sulfate reSOp'sz 0.P. hgnesium Sulfate 15360407320 0.P. 2 , 8 'methylenebis-e-chlorc—c-is o- prepylphencl Penicillin 0 Potassium, Control number 358827 . Petals inn Phos pha ts monobas io WPOQ 0e Po Sodium arsenate dibasic leaflAsOp'Inzo reagent Sodium ”senite Rodeo; anal. reagent Sodium Chloride ReOl O.P. Sodium Phosphate dibesic Ream 0.P. 2 , :5 , 5 , Triphcnyl-zfi-Te trazoliun Chloride Baker Difco Difco Dif cc Kerk Eimer d: amend Dow 30311 DB Baker Merl: fillinekrcdt Baker Baker Distillation .Products 104 LITERATURE CITED Abraham, LP. and 1. Chain. An enzyme from bacteria able to destroy penicillin. Nature. 146:857. 1940. Bigger. LI. Treatment of staphylococcal infections with penicillin. Lancet. 1423497-500. 1944. Bordt, DJ. A study of chemical agents for selective growth of the coliform organisms. Unpublished thesis for the degree of 11.3. mshigan State College. 1951. ‘ Durnet. 3.!" 1.0. Stone and LG. Anderson. An epidemic of influenza B in Australia. Lancet. 250:807-811. 1946. Cevallitc. 0.1. and 3.3. Baily. Preliminary note on the inactivation of antibiotics. Science. 100:390. 1944. Chain. 3. and 3.3. ‘Duthie. Bactericidal and bacteriolytic action of penicillin on the staphylococcus. Lancet. 248: 552-657. 1945. Chapmn, 0.3. A culture medium for detecting and confirming achgfighia c in ten hours. An. Jour. of Pub. Health. 3 5 . 95 . Curran. 3.3. and LB. Evans. The importance of enrichments in the cultivation of bacterial spores previously ex- posed to lethal agencies. Jour. Beet. 34:179-189. 1937. Davis. 3.1). Isolation of biochemically deficient mutants of bacteria by penicillin. Jour. Am. Chem. 800. 7034267. 1948. Dienes, 1.. Isolation of pleuropneunonia-like organisms from pathological specimens with the aid of penicillin. Proc. 8000 hp. 8101. and “do 64‘3)3165'166. 1947. Difco finual. ninth Edition. Difco Laboratories. Inc. De- troit. pp.284-285. 1955. Dubos. 3.3. The Bacterial Cell in its Relation to Problems of Virulence. Immunity and Chemotherapy. Harvard Univ- ersity Press. Cambridge, Mass. pp.509-311. 1947. ! N 105 Dufrenoy. 5.. L.A. Strait and n. Pratt. IV’Ccmparative responses of gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria to penicillin. Ibur. Bact. 54:719-730. 1947. Eagle. H. and A. D. Mhsselman. the slow recovery of bacteria from.the toxic effects of penicillin. Jour. Bact. 58: 475-490. 1949. ‘ Planing. A. On the antibacterial action of cultures of a fgnigilligg?_with special reference to their use in the scletion c hw. Brit. Jour. Exp. Path. 10: 286. 1939. Poster. I.I. and B.L.‘Iilker. Microbiological aspects of Penicillin. II Turbidometric studies on penicillin in- hibition. Ibur. Bact. 46:377-389. 1943. Hawkins. 1. Growth of protozoa in tissue culture. II a- iggggmnbeli t . excerythrocytic forms. Trans. Roy. oc. Hobby, 6.1.. and 11.3. Dawson. Bacteriostatic action of peni- cillin on hemolytie streptococcus in vitro. Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Mbd. 553178-181. 1944a. lobby. 0.1.. and M.H. Dawson. Effect of rate of growth of bacteria cn.action of penicillin. Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. use. 56:181-184. 1944b. .Bobby. G.L.. It Ibyer and E. Chaffes. Activity of Peni- cillin in vitro. Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Mid. 50:877-280. Bobby. 6.1.. I. lbyer and E. Chaffee. Observations on the mechanism.of action of penicillin. Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Mbd. 50:281-285. 1942. Hewitt, 3.1. and‘V.H. Barnett. Che of penicillin and strep- tomycin in isolation of poliomwelitis virus from.feoal specimens. Ibur. Lab. and Clin. Med. 33:1402-1409. 1948. Irampits, L.0. and C.H.‘Ierkman. 0n the mode of action of penicillin. Arch. Biochem. 12:57-57. 1947. Kauffmann, P. Entercbfgtggiageag. BJnar Mhnksgaard. Copen- ms p.150. 195 e ‘ t O . .‘ . . _ . - . I I ‘- . . . 0 . . . . . . O ‘ C ‘ I so 106 ILawrence, C.A. Sterility test for penicillin. Science. 98: 413-414. 1943. ZLawrence, C.A. Action of clarase upon penicillin. Science. 99: 15-16. 1944. ILederberg, J. Detection of fermentative variants with tetra- zolium. Jaur. Beet. 56:695. 1948. Lederberg. I. and N. Zinder. Concentration of biochemical mutants of bacteria with penicillin. Jour. Ann Chem. Soc. 7084267. 1948. , ILee, S.I.. 3.3. Foley and J.A. Epstein. Mbde of action of penicillin. I Bacterial growth and penicillin activity. JOur. Bact. 48:393-399. 1944. lLitsky, I}, ItL. Hallmann and 0.5. Pifield. Ethyl violet. A selective dye for the isolation of gramrnegative bac- teria. Stain Tcohn. 27: 229-232. 1952. Litsky, I" I.L. Mallmann and OJ. Fifield. A new medium for the detection of enterococci in water. Amer. JOur. Pub. Bhalth. 43:873-879. 1953. thLcan. 1.3. A modification of the cough plate method of diagnosis in whooping cough. Jour. of Path. and Bast. 2:472. 1937. .lhllmann. W.L. and~C.W. Darby. Uses of lauryl sulfate tryp- tose broth for the detection of coliform.srganisms. Am. Ibur. of Pub. Health. 31:127-134. 1941. IhCulloch, E.C. Disinfection and Sterilization. Second Ed. Lea and Fabiger. Philadelphia. Morin, J.E. and H. Turcotte. The biological purification of vaccine emulsions by penicillin. Canadian Jour. Res. Sect. E. Med. Sci. 24:149-154. 1946. Pinzi, T. Penicilina en.medios de cultivo para ggzpanosoma crusi. Biologica (Santiago. Chile). 5:107-109. 1945. Premar, D.. H. Houhannes and B.A. Ragotzkie.' Survival of tubercle bacilli in various sewage treatment processes. Pub. Health Reports. 65(27):851-859. 1950. .0 'l 107 Bantz, L.A. and mu. Kirby. The action of penicillin on staphylococcus in vitro. JOur. Immunol. 48:335-343. 1944. Reinhold, G.l;, ML Sworn, and R.V. Hussong. A plating medium for the isolation and enumeration of enterococci. Ibur. Dairy Sci. 36:1-5. 1953. Boepke, 8.8.. 3.1.. Libby and ma. Small. Mutation or var- iation of §;,coli with respect to growth requirements. Jour. Beet. 48:401-412. 1944. Schwartzman, G. Inhibition of’jh,goli by penicillin. Science. Spicer, S. and D. Blitz. A study of the response of bac- __jerisl populations to the action of penicillin: a quan- titative determination of its effect on the organisms. Jour. Lab. and Glin. use. 53(4):4l7-429. 1948. Thomas, A.R. Jr. and ML Levine. Some effects of penicillin on intestinal bacteria. Jour. Beet. 49:623-625. 1945. Vainwright, S.D. and J. lhllaney. An influence of carbon source upon the penicillin sensitivity of §s2§e§1chig 231i,in solid medium. Jour. Bact. 67:504. 4. loodruff, H.B. and J.I. Foster. Incrobiological aspects of penicillin. VII Bacterial penicillinsse. Ibur. Bact. 4937-17. 1945. Young, B.G., R.W. Begg and E.I. Pentz. Inorganic nutrient requirements of Escherichia 221;, Arch. Biochem. 5:121- 136. 1944. {£65331 USE Giéii’ ”'Tflififiijkniliflfl‘fljflililj\fiiflljl\li\ifiuifim'ES 711