THOMAS wamwonm .HIGGH.Ns%oN,1_* ; . Q REE-mama: ANa'MAN as LETTERS * i Thesis {er the Degrséof Ph. D,‘ MECHIGANJS'IFATE ‘UNWERSITYZ ‘ w Sisfer Thomas ‘Cafherifie‘Brennan, QP 1953 ' ' ’ THOMAS sz'rwomH HIGGHNSGN: REFGRMER AND} MAN 05 LETTERS Thesis for the Déjgree of Ph. D .7 MECHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY Sister Thomas Catherine Brennan, 0 P. 1958 ‘ This is to certify that the thesis entitled THOMAS WENTWORTH HIGGINSON: REEORIER AND MAN OF LETTERS presented by Sister Thomas Catherine Brennan has been accepted towards fulfillment of the requirements for M.— degree mm 1 (4-4 M. 721.44.; Major professor Date November 19, 1958 0-169 ”fitted to ' shte Unite in part THOMAS WENTWORTH HIGGINSON: REFORMER AND MAN OF LETTERS By SISTER THOMAS CATHERINE BRENNAN, o. P. A THESIS Submitted to the School of Graduate Studies of Michigan State University of Agriculture and Applied Science in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Department of English 1958 uhOOOOOOOO Mean”... WIMROWC W 11 NE MIN] A. P0111 Bo Biog: W111 131; 501.2 A. CiVi 3. Vrit W IV DIE 001 A. Worm 3. 8001' 0. Adv; D. Bio; W“ V 001m 51%)ng . . . Willa-'37 a we?! TABLE OF CONTENTS vinOOOOOOOOOOCOOOOOOOOOOOOIOOO Prefaceoo........oo.........o..... WAFER I INTRODU CTI ON 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 CHAPTER II HIE MINISI‘ER AND THE SLAVES A. Political Views and Anti-Slavery Activities. B. Biographies and Essays . . . . . . . o . . . CHAPTER III THE SOLDIER AND HIS REGJMENT A. Civil War and Army Life in a Black Regiment. Bo Writings 12913th to the CiV'il War. 0 o o o 0 CHAPTER IV THE COLONEL AND THE LADIES A. Woman Suffrage Activities. . . . . . . . . . B.SocialTheory................ C. Advice to Young Contributors . . . . . . . . D. Biographies, Essays, and Fiction . . . . . . mmMER v CONEUSION. O O . O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O Bibliographyooooo00000000000000.0000 ii Page iii iv 12 70 101;, 119 128 139 NA 182 257 263 _—-— ..__—- __,. _———-— . . - — I 1 I i I 000000 0000000000000000 O 0 "‘ aaaaaa 0 ~ w w 4| -. ’ “ ° “ ° '7 9 v q oooooo r aaaaaaa nnnnnn O ‘l ’\ '\ , n ‘7 ppppppppp flflflflflfl 000000000000 1‘ '1 a o v —~ ffffffffff w n 1" 9999 nnnnnnnnn 81st Final muons: Deflation: how of Le1 mtline of Studies: Major Subject: Minor mbject: BiOgl'aphical Items: Born, October 1 “Memento : Heights Ct Graduate S‘badin cat-11011:: I 191:6.19ha Elibel'ience: E Parochial at Domm High Schc Lansing, 319113 Hei VITA Sister Thomas Catherine Brennan, 0. P. candidate for the degree of Doctor of PhilosoPhy Final Ruminations : Dissertation: Ihomas Wentworth Higginson: Reformer and Han . ‘ of Letters . . mtline of Studies: Major Subject: American Literature Minor atbject: English Literature Biographical Items: Born, October 16, 1920, Detroit, Michigan Undergraduate Studies, Bachelor of Philoso by, Siena Heights College, Adrian, Michigan, 19 0-19h6. Graduate Studies, Master of Arts in English Literature, Catholic University of America, _Washing.ton, D. C. , l9h6—19h8. Experience: Elementary school teacher in Illinois parochial schools. High school teacher of English at Dominican High School, Detroit; St. Alphonsus High School, Dearborn; Resurrection High School, Lansing. Instmctor of English, summer sessions, Siena Heights College, Adrian, Michigan. iii Sister thitted to t st“ Whiter. in partL A ‘. Pprom‘u‘ nuns WENIWORTH HIGGINSON: REFOMER AND HAN OF LETIEIB By Sister Times Catherine Brennan, 0. P. AN ABSTRACT Submitted to the School of Graduate Studies of Michigan State University of Agriculture and Applied Science in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree or DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Department of English Year 1958 Approved ngmgé 77) _ flung,“ ms TIME! This um 18 1 mun 0110mm a unffngo momenta. bibliognpw, the stu anti-slavery activiti suffrage activities, Chpter I, the ' this study by stressi between Egginson's 1 letters. chpter II, um “M's Political view. his 31111.51me act ms, the ham mi. View; ‘3 exPressed 1 The “PM? Conclude after the ‘WeSSion chm In, '1 Hillary “rear as c C ”011m. H13 Civil his impression, of ‘ freed shvES. This am“ totether wit} THOMAS WENIWORI‘H HIGGINSON: REFOMER AND MAN OF LETTERS This thesis is limited to homes Wentworth Higginson's career as a non of letters and as a reformer in the anti-slavery and woman suffrage movements. Divided into five chapters with a preface and bibliography, the study includes Higginson's political views, his anti-slavery activities, his service in the Civil War, his woman suffrage activities, and his writings on these subjects. Chapter I, the “Introduction" indicates the approach used in this study by stressing the integral relationship which existed If between Higginson‘s life as a reformer and his life as a man of letters. Chapter II, "The Minister and the Slaves,“ discusses Higgin- son's political views as a Republican and as an ardent abolitionist, his anti-slavery activities connected with the fugitive slave res- cues, the Kansas emigration, the John Brown affair, and his liberal views as expressed in speeches and sermons published in the Liberator. The chapter concludes with Higginson's change of heart toward disunion after the secession of the south and the attack on Fort Sumter. Chapter III, "The Soldier and His Regiment," recounts Higginson's military career as colonel of a regiment of Negro freed men in South Carolina. His Civil War memoir, Aggy 1.333 33 _a_ £1.33}; Regiment depict: his impressions of the Negroes and his opinion of the status of the freed slaves. This book and his work as State historian of Massachu- setts, together with several essays related to this period are the subject of this chapter. Chapter IV, 'fll activities at “I I an «new as up! “M! m h colorniun mg I «him of Ernst P: hiabiognphies of I.) and Julia Hard Hove. MN! fuinino type 1M ideal of woman) health hbits of was: Investigation oi out the reputation h: m Mom, of his] Chapter IV, ”The Colonel and the ladies," describes Higginson's activities at women suffrage conventions, his social theory of Ameri- can democracy as expressed in the women's magazines, Woman's Journal and Beggar's £5355, his literary criticism of the new school of local color writers among whom were several women, his assistance as literary adviser of Harriet Prescott, Helen Hunt Jackson, and Baily Dickinson, his biographies of Lydia Maria Child, Una Hawthorne, Margaret Fuller, and Julia Ward Howe. His fiction, Malbone and a few short stories, portray feminine types, and his essays for the Atlantic M15, set up an ideal of womanhood and suggestions for reform in dress and the health habits of women. Investigation of these phases of Higginson's career has borne out the reputation he holds as a writer of high literary quality and as a reformer of high romantic idealism. ,—— in first acimovl Moms General of t Adrian, Michigan. Be tmity of pursuing g] investigating thin Next, Ivould 11 Claude ii. Kaitlin, tn. “5 Min suggested tunic kindness, p m It has been b. W” Dr. 3031111 and his 3chflamhip. I“ also grate Within, °‘ W nan subject. Iiish 813 Hoist, the other men Hm oi th‘ “filial: I“ My Slit! cation skills 50pm mutual, pmttn concerning Join BN1 Public Library, PREFACE My first acknowledgment is to Mother Mary Gerald Barry, O.P. , Prioress General of the Sisters of the Third Order of Saint Dominic, Adrian, Michigan. Because of Mother Gerald I have had this oppora- ’ tunity of pursuing graduate study at Michigan State University and of investigating this dissertation topic. ‘ Next, Iwould like to express my special indebtedness to Dr. H Claude M. Newlin, the head of my committee and my major professor. Dr. Newlin suggestedthis topic and has directed it with his charac- teristic kindness, personal consideration, and constructive criti- Cism. It has been both a pleasureand a privilege to have studied under in». Newlin. and to have shared in the breadth and depth of his scholarship. I am also grateful to Dr. David C. Head for his valuable criticisms of my manuscript and for his kindly interest in this subject. I wish also to thank Dr. Iawrence Babb and Dr. William Heist, the other members of my comittegand Dr. Russel B. Nye, Head of the English Department. I am Very grateful to Dr. Benjamin B. Hickok, of the Communi- cation Skills Department at Michigan State University, for so generously pennittingme to use his microfilm of the correspondence concerning John Brown in the Higginson Collection in the Boston Public Library. iv Aputicflar M 3 Manama! ! D ‘ mudcmnflm a: thin m to caplet! finally, I 1m11 Mo University for A particular and large measure of my gratitude belongs to Sister ‘ Matthew Ann and the Sisters at Resurrection Convent for their encourage- ment and countless acts of kindness which have assisted me in bringing this work to completion. Finally, I would like to thank the library staff at Michigan State University for placing materials at my disposal. Tm: Ventuort tauchusetta, Deed m achoohastor for It unaided Harvard tho mat liberal win W First Religious M “WW! dove “*4" parish. Bis 181:8. With his win human, to z; W hind! in m mm“, b, Wrote 1 11“"?! quality 1:): "fl of letters. { “W m 1,, 1861 hMimi to den Hummus, W“ Part in the colonelcy o: a ”981 for two mm mm Vice in 1361;. CHAPTER I mmmc TION Thomas Ventvorth Higginson use born of Puritan stock in Cambridge, lhssachusetts, December 22, 1823. He graduated from Harvard in 18131, was schoolmaster for two years, then decided to enter the ministry. He attended Harvard Divinity School and was strongly inclined toward the most liberal wing of Unitarianism. He accepted the pastorate of the First Religious Society (Unitarian) of Newburyport, Massachusetts, and inodiately devoted himself to reform measures in an ultra-conser- vative parish. His ardent abolitionist views cost him his pulpit in 18118. With his wife, Mary Channing Higginson, he moved to Worcester, Massachusetts, to take charge of a secularized Free Church. Here he found himself in the midst of seething reform activities. In the meantime, he wrote poetry, essays, and biographical sketches of such literary quality that he achieved, early in life, the reputation of a man of letters. The attraction of reform and literature were so strong that in 1861, after fifteen years of service as a minister, he resigned to devote himself to a profession of writing and lecturing. Circumstances, however, and his on active temperament forced him to take part in the Civil War. He was offered and accepted the colonelcy of a regiment of Negro freed men in 1862 which he commended for two years until an injury caused him to retire from military ser- vice in 1861:. humane mum... Although such new WWI, the ctr: Jitténuur set a bi Win, and coats: is a mfoner, Phasing upon the t M! convictions, he thankfully by 11M. His influen "W instances, esp 3 Pioneer whose signs Hereturned to civilian life and lived at Newport, Bhode Island, where his wife, an arthritic invalid, had moved during his absence. His literary life at Newport was stimulated by his contact with li- terary figures and reform leaders with whom be associated. His wife died in 1877 and he went abroad for a few mantra. In 1878 he returned to Cambridge and in 1879 married Mary Thacher. They had two children, one of whom died in infancy. For the remainder of his life, Higginson earned his living by writing and lecturing. He died in 1911. This brief factual biography of Higginson tells very little of the spirit of the man who wrote in 1816, A pure earnest aim is not enough. Intellectual as well as moral armor must be bright for I know I shall have to sustain a warfare. . . . An aesthetic life--how beauti- ' ful-but the life of a Reformer, a People's Guide, 'bat- tling for right'v-glorious, but on, how hard.'1 Although such idealism may be unquestionably attributed to youth, ne- vertheless, the strong attraction of the life of a reformer and of a littérateur set a high goal which demanded much by way of idealism, optimism, and courage. is a reformer, Higginson played a minor role in the great issues pressing upon the turbulent nineteenth century. Always a liberal in his convictions, he followed the inaugurators of refonns and assisted than materially by assuming local leadership in the cities where he lived. His influence, however, should not be underestimated, for in new instances, especially in the woman suffrage movement, he was a pioneer whose signature and presence gave the weight of respectability lfiary Thacher Higginson,_____ Thomas Wentworthflggin so : the Story of _H_i__a _L_i___fe (Boston, 1911;), p. 71. Milt b locus inv WI public school name of educa mu contributing a in Public library. pluical exercise w] lumen working on leaders in the tap hung at comntio MI 111me in the C in strong drink. lo we also at Mon and a helper has along the 31 of the radical outl 'Pirltmlia throw interest: indicate Hanson‘s mark to sthenuiee‘ 1'radica’l" measures. Is a reformer it was impossible for Higginson to limit himself to one or two moVements. A whole network of social problems, which seemed to hinge upon one another, opened before him, and as be inter- ested himself in one he found himself smashed in the others. As a result he became involved in most of the issues. He supported Horace Hahn's public school system and was, most of his life, on one or an- other board of education. His lyceun lectures, as part of adult edu- cation, were popular and stimulating. He advocated public libraries and was instrumental in setting up local libraries where he lived, even contributing a collection of almost a thousand books to the Bos- fon Public Library. He was among the early supporters of physical education and gymnasiums for both young men and women. He often at- tributed his long and healthy life to the fact that he took regular physical exercise when a young man. He advocated labor unions and improved working conditions for men and women. He was one of the leaders in the temperance movement, frequently holding office and lec- turing at conventions. He insisted that his return to health after his injury in the Civil War was due to the fact that he never indulged in strong drink. He was also averse to tobacco. He was an early apostle of prison reform and a helper of the social outcast, the discharged prisoner. He was among the strongest supporters of the Free Church movement-cone of the radical outgrowths of Unitarianism, and he became interested in spiritualism through his membership in the Radical Club. These many interests indicate a very full life and one can readily understand Higginson's remark that he never knew a moment of boredom. «alum regimt life. His enthulia much Illout pa . masses-.112 item's ri. underway. For on he locum plat! Wtion.‘ His 3: i ‘ to man mffrage o! ‘ ’ Iphm would be bro: Wlitieally. mm M suffrage move: Month propheai m in American a this reason he once before the public 1 intaaamanoi‘le Wmdistic and 'Jhe two reforms, however, which occupied the largest portion of his life were abolition and woman suffrage. The appeal of the former which smote his conscience and his heart very early in life was simple. ~ ‘ is he said» many times, once grant that one man cannot hold another man I 1 as property and the argument is won. The appeal went far deeper however. | i i Higgnson came to know personally and to revere several Negro leaders, among whom were fugitives from the South and freed men from the North, such as Harriet Tubman and Frederick Douglass. ,His position as a colonel of a Negro regiment of freed slaves was one of the greatest joys of his life. His enthusiasm and pride in these men was genuine and in many respects almost paternal. This is evident in his best work, gm E2 in a M Ream ent. The women's rights movement he accepted as a challenge to Ameri- can democracyr For sixty years he spent himself, gallantly fighting on the lecture platform and in his writings for "the other half of the population." His advocacy of women's rights, however, was not limited to woman suffrage only. He expected that with the right to vote, woman‘s sphere would be broadened socially, educationally, industrially, and "‘ politically. Although he did not live to see the fulfillment of the woman suffrage movement in the passage of the nineteenth amendment, he frequently prophesied its coming for he recognized that the status of women in American society had long passed its "Chrysalis" stage. For this reason he encouraged the rising group of authoresses, and brought before the public the achievements of women, however great or small. And, as a man of letters, he found at hand ample source material both Propagandistic and artistic in these two movements. wt of it is of . tending and rewarc‘ and genteel style i: Mi: uriting is d! 1! so self-effecing enough the natural ‘ Mlorlng diacussim 11km atimlatin Impose. ‘_. 2mm H. Hin Mom (Unwblishe 3Edgar Lindsle litany Critic (Ur: 3a“: 19%}. Two phases of Bigginson's literary career have been thoroughly in- vestigated in earlier dissertations. One by Howard Hintz2 is a general survey of Higginson‘s life and work in the light of Emersonian idealism. Hints points out that Higginson's optimism and noble aims were largely inspired in his youth by the older transcendentalists, especially Ener- son, and that Higginson represented these qualities, although in some- what diluted form with the pas sing of years, well into the twentieth century. Higginson's position as a literary critic has also been dis- cussed in a more recent study.3 It is the purpose of this thesis, however, to examine the rela- tionship between Higginson‘s reform activities in the anti-slavery and woman suffrage movements and his literary career. Although much of his writing is necessarily of a propagandistic nature, a considerable amount of it is of real literary value. The study has been eminently revealing and rewarding, for behind the facade of Higginson's graceful and genteel style is a man of action. The mildness of his manner and of his writing is deceiving. Even Cheerful Yesterdays, his autobiography, is so self-effacing that it does not bring to the fore emphatically enougl the natural vigor and vitality of the man. It is hoped the following discussion will rectify this impression, for Higginson‘s life was stinmlating in its courage, fearlessness, and nobility of purpose . 2Howard w. Hintz, Thomas Wentworth Hi ginson: Disciple of 3133 Newness (Unpublished doctoral dissertation: New York University, 3Edgar Lindsley McCormick, Thomas Wentworth Hi ' son 3.3. a Litera Critic (Unpublished doctoral dissertation: éniversity of Michigan, 0 . perhaps one reason hotter his death active Ion, Higgins fult in More B toconcentrate thy: fit, of vhtmr k hrbr nor laminae Hanson today is notation in one o “salmon himself 1 autobiography, nSm hp: not so really M "has Vernall of Thea: Vontwort ' 5'1'heodore Pa Ventmrth Higginso It must also be kept in mind, while examining his writings, that Higginson did not regard a literary career as the highest aim in life. His passionate fondness for literature and for writing was second to his hmniterianism. It is with this idea that he concluded his auto- MOSI‘IPWO 'lho high-water mark of earthly endeavor is not to be found in the pure love of science or art or literature, since these do not, at their utmost, include all the interests of man, . . . but it lies in aims so far-reaching tl'nt they ex- clude all petty personalities-min aims such as are expressed in George Eliot's 'choir invisible,’ or in the sublime prayer of the French iconoclast, Proufihon, 'Let my memory perish, if only humanity may be free.‘ is a man of'letters, therefore, Higginson's life was inextrica- bly bound up with his times. The ephemeral content of his work is perhaps one reason for the sudden decline of his reputation immediate- ly after his death in 1911. Another reason is that, like most overly- ‘{ active men, Higginson scattered his energies. He spoke of this as a fault in Theodore Parker and quoted from Goethe, "Strive constantly to concentrate thyself, never dissipate your powers; incessant acti- vity, of whatever kind, leads to bankruptcy."5 Although neither Parker nor Higginson could be accused of bankruptcy, nevertheless Higginson today is considered second rate as a writer. Perhaps con-‘ centration in one or two fields might have given him a lasting name. Higginson himself realized this, for he says of his activities in his autobiograptn', "Such versatility makes life very enjoyable, but. per- haps not so really useful or successful as a career like that of my bThomes Wentworth Higginson, Cheerful Yesterda s, I, The Works of Thomas Wentworth Higginson (Boston, I, p. 53%. 5"Theodore Parker," Contem oraries II, The Works of Thomas Wentwarth Higginson (Boston, T900), Po 1° We final 6 Mali!- 50 did] to adopt a .31: too nah 1' ml by a fria nee, hit which in Ire races t Neither did Big points out, 'Jike Ju or, like liaison and mat-8 Yet he sold mintined it at a 1 Image Of years. I sessed the ability ‘ 0? life. Charles F tVo qualitie Sufinej These two em: rather f fineness of th appreciation e fore to form, ~~ . are bel Both these 916 wflon‘ 2o 11 inch of his best Wt th . e met ten War: Yeala that he “1‘0 t1 eontomporsry, Francis Parkmn, 1'----a. specialist before the days of specialism.6 He did not, however, regret his course. To adopt a different method, as I did, is to put one's self too much in the position of a. celebrated horse once . owned by a friend of mine,--a horse which had never won a. race, but which was prized as having gained a second place in more races than any other horse in America. Neither did Higginaon have the happy faculty, as Bliss Perry points out, "like Julia Ward Howe, to win fame by one ecstatic lyric, or, like Wesson and Ellery Charming to be remembered by one famous line."8 Yet he achieved a. high excellence in his prose and constantly maintained it at a level which neither improved nor declined with the passage of years. His style was graceful and flowing, and he pos- sessed the ability to touch delicately and lightly the finest aspects of life. Charles F. Thwing states that Higginson‘s style possessed two qualities--fineness and fire. These two elements are characteristic. It is, how- ever, rather fineness than fire that dondnates. . . . Fineness of thinking, fineness of feeling, fineness of appreciation eVer seem to me to belong to hm, and there- fore to form, or to give at least atmosphere to his writing. . . . Fire belongs more to his understanding of movements. Both these elements are obvious in his contributions to the {it £833.39 Monthly. It will be noticed in the course of this study that web of his best work was published in the Atlantic Monthly during the first ten years of its existence, although his bibliography re- veals that he wrote for nearly seventy journals during his prolific career. It will also be noticed that many of his early contributions 6Cheerful. Yesterdays, p. 183- 71bid. 8Bliss Perry, "The Colonel‘s Quality," _'1;h_e_ Praise of Folly and Other Papers (Boston, 1923), 13-7750 » _ 9Charles Franklin Thwing, "Thomas Wentworth Higginson,“ Friends 52 Mi’! (New York, 1933), Po 123- o in M El new of “1' "i W bowl; 331810. 319”: “é; literary figures °f : literary prestige- ' mpafior writers as and anti-slavery” ma Underwood had succee hind his in establis forces of expression J. P. Jerett & Co. t Southem mstomers t coooerate in Underwc and cordial response was disappointed in the fall of 1853. As limrary ad' tareated them in hi Wendi, Lowell, ii“: in 1857, the g The relation 0 , The conte Chlefly litsra 1 u 0M. A * i719), p. N‘DWOlf to the Atlantic Mbnthly are roformatory in content. A glance at the background of the magazine will perhaps explain Higginson's policy. Higginson began publishing poetry, sermons and lectures as early as 18h3. These, together with his personal acquaintanceship with the literary figures of Boston and Concord, gave him, by 1852, an assured literary prestige. When Francis H. Underwood, in 1853, looked for superior writers as contributors to his new literary project, a "literary and anti-slavery" magazine, Higginson was invited to contribute articles. Underwood had succeeded in persuading J. P. Jewett & Co. to stand be- hind him in establishing the new magazine which would unite “the strongest forces of expression in the joined causes of letters and reform."10 J. P. Jewett & Co. had proved that they were unafraid of alienating their Southern customers by publishing Eagle 2221i Eabin and they agreed to cooperate in Underwood's project. After having obtained an immediate and cordial response from the outstanding New England writers, Underwood was disappointed in the sudden financial failure of the Jewett firm in the fall of 1853. As literary adviser for Phillips, Sampson & Co., Underwood in- terested them in his project and with his former correspondents (Emerson, Longfellow, Lowell, Holmes, Cabot, and Motley) as his counsel, he be- gen, in 1857, the Atlantic Monthly with Lowell as editor-in-chief. The relation of the Atlantic gggthly to the reform movements of the day would be an interesting study in itself. Louis J. Budd states: The contents of the early Atlantic were, of course, chiefly literary. Still, from its birth, aligned with K.- 10M. A. DeWolfe Howe, The Atlantic Monthly 33g _i_t_s_ Makers (Boston, 1919), p. 16. _ the mm W it. devoted 911" Jam ““11 I ”1.168 for a mg.' m Ilin trend: m after the civil the hearts of ‘ favored 0M1! “1160111, Grlntl mama's pal also be the subject nah with both Love] mm as 'so true I queues: withheld bin «use of anti-slave: about publishing hi: of his conservative sditonhp, (1857-15 Phsical education: naetica,‘ (March, 1! 1560); 'Hamons of s 1861); "Nat hmer': 'hmier of the Innm tomhip (18621-1871), “”1“ of Our Girl: (Neuter, 1361), a] \ 11 101118 J. Bhdl tanigm’l American E 12 h.,9£.sl the rising Republican party through both editors and owners, it devoted substantial attention to contemporary affairs 3 James Mason Lowell, the first editor, penned political polemics for this new organ of 'Literature, Art, and Poli- tics. ' During the 1860's James T. Fields, moving with the main trend, further widened the periodical's coverage, and after the Civil War had enshrined the Republican party in the hearts of the New England intelligentsia. The Atlantic favored openly the triumphant antislavery legions 0 Lincoln, Grant, and Charles Sumner.11 Higginson's pa rt in the early policies of the magazine could also be the subject for a separate study, for Higginson was inti- mate with both Lowell and Fields. Lowell himself has been des- cribed as "so true and spirited a patriot that no fear of conse- quences withheld him from open identification with the heterodox cause of an1'.i-s1avery,"12 although Higginson found him reticent about publishing his "Ought Women to Learn the Alphabet?" because of his conservative attitude toward women suffrage. Within Lowell's editorship, (1857-1861), however, Higginson published his essays on plwsical education: "Saints and their Bodies," (March, 1858); "Gym- nastics," (March, 1861); on slavery: "Marooneof Jamaica ," (February, 1350); "Haroons of Surinam" (May, 1860); "Dennark Vesey," (June, 1861): "Nat Turner's Insurrection," (August, 1861); on education: “Murder of the Innocents," (September, 1859). During Field's edi- torship (1861-1871), he published essays on physical education: ”Health of Our Girls ," (June, 1862); on smoking: "A New Counterblsst," (December, 1861), and his Civil War papers discussed below. M quuis J. Budd, "Howells, the Atlantic Monthly and Republi- canism," American Literaturg, XXIV (Hay, 1:952 , p. 8. 1211mm, 92. 2}}: p. 28. hold! no .611 tumult “5 P“ «finite anti-slam his friandohip with .. (and [ m ‘ out I could nova :1 rule, I race made 01 offligginoon'o cont: Higginson‘ our lightly. lutrioos poet hid lore to do chief characte: “We“ the re: Howells. m; matter a well Policy. Too literary p m that 53-881mm first “My volume hell and 301,193,. “I" The fact the We shows that th “Peer. This is no “on n. M we not Sent to Oh \ ”changes “u 1953), pings? his 15 “$5333., 10 Fields was editor of the Atlantic throughout the Civil War, and in accepting and publishing Higginson's war essays, he carried on the definite anti-slavery character of the magazine. Higginson says of his friendship with Fields, "I happened to be one of his favorites, . . .‘and [he] was the only editor I have ever encountered whose judg- ment I could move for an instant by any cajoling; editors being, as a rule, a race made of adamant, as they should be. "13 James Austin says of Higginson's contributions during Fields's management: Higginson's part in the Atlantic is not to be passed over lightly. Though he is often overshadowed by the il— lustrious poets and essayists who were his colleagues, he had more to do with the serious prose style that was a chief characteristic of the magazine than any other writer between the resignation of Lowell and the appointment of Howells. This included the war period, wherein Higginson's matter oi well as manner was authoritative Atlantic Monthly 8| policy.1 The literary prestige of the journal from its beginnings and the fact that Higginson could boast that he ”wrote more largely for the first twenty volunes of the magazine than any other contributor except Lowell and Holmes,"15 indicates the stature of his reputation at this time. The fact that most of his contributions dealt with timely sub- Jects shows that the reform element played a large part in his literary career. This is not to imply, however, that his work for the Mg 219332: was limited to reform topics or that his articles on reform were not sent to other leading journals. A glance at the bibliography —--—-——— 13Cheerful Yesterdazg, p. 186» anmes 0. Austin, Fields 9; the Atlantic Monthl , (San Merino, ——--————— 1 1953), p. 2h8. - lsCheerful Yesterda , p. 186. m m that he hJ in l W's «I has: It first I! to hot ton, «let! "M mil: with a your or ti: thing, for he had t] without apparent]; ¢ an ornate: of hi: which he received r: em: “Mint as 1 took: certain mom “Wilt Me at u ““1ch of the pm ““1118 intemsung threshing to ”at t] “7, 1” 31881113011 j “W those co: follow, and Well, that "lane. his ‘ and optimal which 1 as c mm M” “‘1' Optin 1 Man can Emmthet: 1111 show that he had a wide outlet for his ideas on the issues of the -11 “Yo Higginson's exact and methodical habits have made this study easier than was at first anticipated. He collected all his signed articles inu- to book form, sometimes reprinting the same article in tw0 or three Volumes. Frequently articles by him appeared in different magazines within a year or two of one another, saying substantially the same thing, for he had. the public speaker's habit of repeating himself without apparently diminishing the interest of his audience in the man- ner or matter of his. topics. He also preserved carefully all letters which he received .from' great or minor figures. of his day with an un- canny foresight as to their historical and antiquarian value. And he took a certainamountofawell-deserved satisfaction in reprinting in facsimile some of these letters in his volumes and in displaying his knowledge of the personal habits and eccentricities of notables by Writing interesting and amusing reminiscences of them. It has been in- teresting to meet these men and women through the eyes of a contempor- 81‘5’, for Higginson is said to have known "everyone." fimong these contemporaries were his friends, Emerson, Holmes, Long- fellow, and Lowell, who exerted a strong influence on him and whose finest essence his own life emphasized. He drew from them an idealism and optimism which pervades his writings and is evident in such titles as Cheerful Iesterdazs and. "The Sunny Side of the Transcendental Period.n But for this optimism, Hellman asserts, this American faith in moulding the liVing material of his own day into the finer forms inherent in his country's institutions, Emerson, the most influential of our essayists would have had a lesser hold on the minds of his fellow citizens; and the value 04'- Higginson. comes from a similar happy endowment. N 16390130 5. Hellman, I'Later Essayists,” Cambridge History 91 Ameri- 91‘ My: (New York, 1931), III, Part II, p. 118. 1. Wheel? h a young In 1 M the «chant o: moral tiles. Sher Imitation" and could Eamon decided th life, and Wrote to h Mom, 'Setting hintmdated mo hconsider tha cbau M “Mars such “initialed fanatics Mum that he lohJurm or Disuni W for any offi WWW“: Wt 81 In th‘ Ifissolution \ Minus 2 Q.) P. 61. CHAPTERII mm MINISTER AND THE sums n Rnuulflflswdhfiéhwnawhuhsu&}m&) is a young men of twenty in 18,43, Thomas Wentworth Higginson I'hae got the excitement of the great Abolition conventions"1 which he attended several times. Shortly after, he understood "the runof slavery argu- mentation" and could |‘talk abolitionism pretty well. "2 Within the year, Higginson decided that.he wasdestined to live an earnest, independent life, and wrote to his fiance’e.,.Mary Charming)“ his decision to be a reformer. ”Setting out, as I do, with an entire resolution never to be intimidated into shutting either my eyes or my mouth, it is proper to consider thechance of my falling out with the world. “3 He knew that reformers such as Enerson, Alcott, and Mrs. lydia Maria Child were considered fanatics and branded as unsafe by conservatives. By 18116, he recorded that he had enrolled himself in the ranks of the American Non-Jurors or Disunion Abolitionists. He was determined "not only not to vote for any officer who must take the oath to support the U. 3. Constitution, but also to use whatever means may lie in my power to pro- note the Dissolution of the Union. ”)4 1% Wentworth Higginson, p. 60. 2M. , p. 61. 3.193;" p. 68. kw. p. 78. he uh uh anl 13 Biaificantly, the title of his graduation oration from Harvard Divinity School in 181:? was “Relation of the Clergy to Baton-5 let his ordination in Hewburyport, James Freeman Clarke aexhorted his young brother to speak scathing words of rebuke against the sin of slavery,"6 advice which he readily followed. At Newburyport, however, he found himself in one of the most conservative and anti-abolitionist of parishes. By profession, Higginson says, he found himself associated with all that was met reputable in the town; but, by temperament, he was inclined toward that which was most radicalutoward the 'Come-Outers“ and those who belonged to the "Sisterhood of Reformed” He spoke at anti-slavery and temperance meetings and, in 18148, accepted the nomination of the Free Soil Party for Congress. He was defeated and lost his parish be- cause of his anti-slavery views. For 13% years Higginson remained in Newburyport without a pa rish and entered into politics. One of his attempts, as he wrote to his friend, Samuel Longfellow, was "to bring back the Free-Soil party to self-control and consistency from the more fascinating paths of coali- tion and conquest'm-at which he failed. The other was "to induce Massa- chusetts to follow the example of Maine and either have laws that can do something, or none at all, in the way of checking liquor traffic. "8 Hanan suffrage also came in for an early share of his activities. But his growing interest was the slavery reform. During his stay at Newbury- port, he began to meet the older abolitionists, Charles Sunner, Lucy Stone, 51bid. 6mm, p. 85. 7Cheerful Yesterda , p. 119. 8% Wentworth HigginsonI pp. 90-91. Poem Half a tell u “13 v1 like 1 Testy; 0mm E11h filch Vitin Whittier, Thoreau, and Emerson. When the Fugitive Slave Law broke upon the nation in 1850, Higginson indignantly took up ems in earnest and entered into the slavery reform as a moral crusader. He had to wait, however, for an opportunity to act and followed approvingly the newspaper account of the drama tic rescue of the fugitive, 'Shadrach," who was literally whisked away from the court by a group of negroes and rushed to Canada and freedom by white sympa- thizers. ‘lb enter more fully into such activities, Higginson joined Theodore Parker's Vigilance Committee in Boston. The opportunity for excitement cametin April, 1851, when he received word to report to the office of the Liberator for a meeting regarding the kidnapping of the Negro youth, Thomas Sims. The members of the Vigilance Committee, Higginson says, ‘ though personally admirable, were, on the whole, "unfit to undertake any positive action in the direction of forcible resistance to authorities."9 Half of them were non-resistants like their leader Garrison; the other half were I'political Abolitionists," or Free-Soilers who were opposed to any violation of the law. The only ones to be relied upon were a few, 1.. like himself, "whose temperament prevailed over the restrictions of non- resistance on the one side, and of politics on the other.“10 Thomas Sims was held in the court House in Boston under trumped-up charges and a heavy guard. Higginson tried to assist him by consulting Ellis Gray Luring, an abolitionist lawyer, about the wild scheme of £11ch the official record of the Southern court which was lying in- vitingly among the lawyers' papers. He also wrote to an old classmate, 9Cheerful Yesterda , p. 139- loIbid. , p. 11.0. 15 fiber-lea Devens, then United States marsha , imploring him to resign rather than to be the instrument of sending a man into bondage. in ; excerpt from his letter illustrates his sincerity. For myself there is something in the thought of assisting to retum to slavery a man guilty of no crime but a colored skin [it which] every thought of my nature rebels in . . . hort- ror. I think not now of the escaped slave, though he has all sympathies, but of the free men and women who are destined to suffer for this act. And I almost feel as if the nation of which we have boasted were sunk in dust forever, now that jus- tice and humanity are gone, and as if the nineteenth century were the darkest of all ages. ‘ Devens, however, replied courteously that he reserved his decision. Higginson also made a vigorous speech in Tremont Temple urging in- stant action which excited the crowd "to the verge of revolution,"12 but was effectively opposed by a lawyer, Charles Mayo Ellis, who pro- tested againet its tone. 13 Finally, Higginson, with about four or five others, formed a des- perate plan of rescue. Sims was confined in the Court House in a third floor room without grating at the window. A Negro clergyman of Boston, Hr. Grimes, agreed to visit Sims and arrange to have him jump from a window to mattresses placed below and thence to escape in a carriage waiting for him. As Higginson and a friend walked through the Court Square the evening of the proposed rescue, they were dismayed to find men busily fitting iron bars across the window. Their plan was frus. trated. A hurried meeting was held in Theodore Parker's study, where plans were discussed for pirating the boat on which Sims was to be placed. n’l‘hunas Wentworth Higginson, pp. 111-112. 12Uheeru‘iul Yesterdays, p. 1&2. 13mm. , p. 11.3. 16 The uncertainty of the project, however, caused the would-be rescuers to abandon the idea. Thauas Sims was returned to Savannah and publicly whipped. The abolitionists, especially Higginson, were left with the strong impression of the great want of preparation, on their part, for this revolutionary workblh By their defiance of the law in their attempt to rescue Sims they were also left with the strange feeling of being out- side the pale of established institutions. In formulating plans, Hig- ginson said of those days, one was "obliged to lower one’s voice and conceal one's purposes; to see law and order, police and military, on the wrong side, and find good citizenship a sin and bad citizenship a duiwd'ls Higginson's part in the Sims incident gave him enough publicity to bring him to the notice of the Abolition element in Worcester, Massa- chusetts. He was invited to take charge of the Worcester Free Church, an organization which had sprung up under the influence of Theodore Parker's Boston Society--its prototype. This organization suited Hig- giuson because of its secular nature, with no church membership or com- munion service. It resembled, he says, “the ethical societies of the present day, with a shade more of specifically religious aspect. "16 He wrote to a friend that his motives in accepting the Worcester parish were that the radicalism was like that of Lynn, 3 strongly abolitionist town, but "more varied, more cultivated, and more balanced by an opposing 1“:b1d., p. rut. 1517031., p. 1&5. 161b1d., p. 131. 17 '| fora." Furthermore, the free church movement was very strong there, \ 1 and Higginson felt a duty toward it because, he says, he saw the need and possibility “of infusing more reverence £93 p_i_e_tz into the £93- outarim of New England, to which I belong by nature. "17 Worcester, therefore, offered an opportunity for complete dedication to the slav- ery reform, for it was at tint time a l'seething centre of all reforms, and I found myself almost in fashion, at least with the unfashionable. '18 Higginson and his Free Church became an important factor in strong- thening the Underground bilroad in Worcester. He was stockholder of a yacht the Flirt which cruised the coast to assist fugitives or harass boats carrying slaves. Higginson himself took fugitives by night to the suburban home of Stephen Foster, one of the steps of the Underground Railroad. As a member of the Boston Anti-Slavery Society he received fugitives into his home and at one time was even moved with the desire to adopt the white child of a fugitive slave to supply the want of children in his home. During this period (1853-1858) Higginson had a number of speeches and sermons printed in the Liberator. In these he expressed his Disunion .. views boldly and had the courage of his convictions to follow them through. Slavery was a moral issue with him because it involved transgression upon the rights of men and was completely antagonistic to the natural law. In the early days of 1853: he believed Massachusetts to be too lethargic in its attitude toward the slavery question. It was his ambition to be an agitator and to arouse his fellow man to the injustices and atrocities 1’7 'lhomas Wenhaorth Hi inson, p. 115. m 18Cheerful Iggtgrdag, p. 131. 18 of the slavery system. With the passage of the Fugitive Slave Law and ‘ the failure of the abolitionists of Boston to keep Themes Sims in the lorth, more agitation was necessary than ever before. Daniel Webster said at Sales, in that memorable trial, 'There is no escape from confession but suicide, and suicide is confession. ' So I say now, that in this anti-slavery cause or in any moral cause, there is no refuge from agita- tion by chains and dungeons, and chains and dungeons £33 agitation.1 Slavery, he pointed out, was brought to the doorstep of Massachusetts by escaped Negroes, such as Thomas Sims. Norther-hers must now be made to realise its moral and political implications. The enemy "now sits enthroned in State Street, and we have it at am's length. '20 It must be fought first by battling "with the money powers of the city, and the conservative power of the State. '21 Political parties, how- ever, were not the answer to the problem. "What difference is it to the anti-slavery movement whether the Whig and Democratic parties take this or that position on the subject? What idle folly for the Slave Power to hope anything by going there: It should have gone West, to a different National Convention. "22 Within the year, Higginson saw the Thomas Sims incident repeated on a larger scale in the case of Anthony Bums, for this tine the city authorities had to call out the militia to preserve their authori- ty. On Thursday, May 25, 1851:, Rev. Samuel May, secretary of the Bos- ton Anti-Slavery Society, sent word to Higginson that a slave, Anthony l _ 9"Speech at the Anti-Slavery Convention,” 3h: Liberator, February 11, 1853. - ”mm. 21mm. 22mm Ilm : lithe has ' Gridla molv ’ I M1 the c Sane] of in quest Fem: 70ng tacky m b and h EuPpo 51“, Drop; the -P—— ‘ T . ' ' 19 Bums, had been arresfid. The case was to be heard on Saturday morning. mgginson sent word to Martin Stowall (a friend who had experienced a slave rescue in Syracuse, New York) and went to meet the Vigilance Com- nittee in Boston. The committee was "not essentially different fm those which had proved so disappointing three years befom."23 Samuel Gridley Howe gave some good and spirited advice, and twa things were resolved uponuto list the names of those willing to act, and to have a definite leader. One leader could not be agreed upon, so an execu- tive comittee of six was formed: Wendell Phillips, Theodore Parker, Samuel G. Howe, Kemp (an energetic Irishnan), Captain Bearse (Captain of the Flirt), and Higginson. 2’4 Stowall was added at Higginson's re- quest and arrived that evening. At Stowall's suggestion a plan for the rescue of Anthony Bums was adopted. A meeting was to be held at Fameull Hall Saturday night. At the height of the program a loud voice from the gallery was to announce that a mob of Negroes were at- tacking the Court House where Burns was imprisoned. One of the speakers was to be warned of the signal in advance-Wendell Phillips, if possible-- and he, in turn, was to send the mob running to the Court House to a.. support the committee of six who were to act as leaders to bring the slave out of the prison. Higginson heartily endorsed the scheme and prepared for action. A box of axes was bought and the comittee agreed to meet before the general assembly in the Hall on Saturday. The crowd in Faneuil Hall was larger than any one anticipated. The comittee found it impossible to get together for a meeting, so 23Cheerful Yesterdajg, p. it? 21‘Ibid. p. 1148. 20 word was sent haphazardly to each member. Samuel G. Howe and Theodore Parker, the speakers, only half comprehended the message, as it after- wards proved. Wendell Phillips could not be reached at all. It was believed, however, that enough information had been given about the scheme to have it run smoothly. Stowall, Kemp, and Higginson were each to provide five men to head the attack on the court house, and Lewis Hayden, a Negro leader, agreed to supply ten Negroes. The audience at Faneuil Hall, however, was too large; the plat- form could not be reached by a private entrance, and John L. Swift, who was chosen to give the signal, was not believed when he called out the message until too late. Higginson met his group at the Court times and waited for the crowd at the Hall to come to ther support. After the signal was given, a few idlers came running by, but the real leaders of the meet- ing, Howe, Parker, Phillips, and William Francis Charming, were clogged in the Hall and could not get out quickly enough to be of any use. In the meantime, a few of Higginson‘s group came up with a wooden beam. Higginson found himself at the head of it, with a stalwart Negro op- posite him. They battered down the southwest door to the Court House and ran in, the Negro leading and Higginson right behind him, to find themselves faced with policenen who forced them back. Higginson re- ceived a cut on the chin which later left a permanent scar. A man, Batchelder, inside the Court House, was shot and killed. Of this in- cident, Higginson wrote: "There had been other fugitive slave rescues in different parts of the country, but this was the first drop of blood aetually shed. . . .The killing of Batchelder was the first act of Violence."25 The source of the shot was never finally determined. 2 SE20, p. lSSe ' “‘1 21 Iewspaper iteus give conflicting stories. 26 Martin Stowal'l and several others were arrested. Higginson remained outside hoping that reinforce- manta would appear. Instead, two companies of artillery came from Fort Warren and two companies of marines from the Charlestown Navy Yard to put down the insurrection and to guard the Court House. Higginson re- tired to have his chin tended to. Within a few weeks, on June 10, 18514, Higginson was arrested. He reported to Boston for examination, but was never required to appear at the trial about which Theodore Parker later wrote his elaborate defense. Of this Higginson said, “The indictment was ultimately quashed as imperfect, and we all got out of the affair, as it were, by the side- door."27 anthony Bums was returned to his master on what was later known as "Bad Friday." The following Sunday, Higginson preached a semen, "Massachusetts in Mourning,” in which he said, The strokes on the door of that Court-House that night . . . went echoing from town to town . . . and each rever- berating throb was a blow upon the door of every slave prison of this guilty republic.2 Later that year he referred to Anthony Burns and pointed out that America was no lorger free. We claim to be free; and yet, while Massachusetts still retains, and has multiplied a hundred-fold its old prosperity, the only step that is claimed in the direction of freedom is, that whereas it once cost twonty-five dollars to send a slave 26Boston Slave Riot and Trial of Anthony Burns (Boston, 1851;). This volume contains reprints of the newspaper articles which appeared at the time. Several accounts assert that Bachelder was stabbed, not shot. 27Cheerful Yesterdays, p. 162. 28Thomas Wentworth Hi inson , p. 1146. ._ F”. ' 22 into bondage, it costs thousands of dollars now. But renuber, it “only because Hassachusette is rich and luxurious now, and she can afford to pay for the costly luxury of still obeying the Constitution, as she construes it, by sending e use into 'hufle 29 Il'he Fugitive Slave Law, he said, passed under the Constitution, . presented the best of arguients for civil disobedience. It denied habeas corpus and trial by jury; it invested subordinate officers with Judicial power who could be bribed with five dollars to decide cases unjustly. The evil, however, was not that certain points of the Fugi- tive Slave Law were unconstitutional, "but because it is internal: . . . The evil is the object itself."30 A man's conscience must force him to choose sides. Higginson, for one, signed the first petition of the Legislature asking that Massachusetts take steps for the peace- able dissolution of the Union. He was voting again, he said, Free- Soiler that he was, for the same measure. At this time he felt that political action could remedy the situation. Nothing is clearer than that political action must tend to the building up of a Northern Union, a Northern Democracy-4 Democracy that no longer apologizes and cringes when the Constitution and the Union are mentioned, . but which says clearly to the South-“We have Justice and " right, the truth of God, and the sympathies of all good men on our side; you have only a Constitution and a Union.’ let this issue he tried between them.31 The Constitution does not require that Congress should pass laws regarding slavery, he said. It should be the responsibility of the States to make a Fugitive Slave Law. With the Federal Government out of the picture, nullification could take place as a sectional issue, 29'3peech at the Celebration of the West India Busncipation at “11181201!” 399. Liberator (August 11, 1851:). ”an 311bid. 23 and Higginson for one would be in favor of dissolving the Union. The necessity for disunion was made more urgent by the dangers of the pending Kansas-Nebraska Bill in 185!» In February he preached a musing semen against its principles. Giving a brief history of the comprmises, he pointed out that the Kansas-Nebraska Bill, proposed by Stephen Douglas was the direct result of Douglas's recent visit to Rus- sia; that Russia's policy was to have the United States so absorbed in internal conflict that it could not take part in the coming death- struggle of despotism in Europe. "When this administration suddenly suffers a contest to be reopened, which it had solemnly pledged it- self to keep closed forever, we must look further for the explanation than the politics of one continent only. '32 Higginson believed that the Nebraska Bill would pass, but he did not believe that slavery would necessarily be extended. His reasons were, first, that slavery was economically unsound; second, that emi- grants hated its third, that the rising agitation against slavev pre- dicted freedom even without the action of law. He was caustic in his outline of the consistent weaknesses of politicians in making the com- Promises which led from one to another, so that even the great Webster, after sincerely pledging in 181:8 that he would never consent to the ad- mission of another slave State into the Union was supporting the Nebra- ska Law. Politicians could no longer connnand respect. “In what has "his Anti-Slavery principle shown itself better than Democratic Anti- Shvel'y principle, that it should claim our greater confidence new?” h—-l—— 32"The Nebraska Bill: A Semen," _'I'_h_e' Liberator (February 17, 0 ”ma. 2h Higginson proposed the renew of curing agitation by agitation-- so as ”to hasten the time when agitation will be unnecessary.“ Senator Douglas, through this bill, Higginson maintained, was unconsciously starting an impulse toward agitation "that may help the whole nation to I a healtlw state again."3h It did no good to try to dismiss the topic of slavery from the Senate hall, for slavery was its own worst enemy. Anus-slavery discussion proceeded from principles deep in the human soul whichwauld endure. l"i‘here are but two powerful things upon this continent, Slavery and Anti-Slavery:«politics and religion and con- science are the submissive servants of one or the other of these. ”35 The Nebraska Bill, he added in a fiery peroration, was "not a new Com- promise to save the Union; it was the repeal of an old one, which was made to save it before." Higginson had no respect for compromises and asked acridly, "But if this nation attaches no more importance to its conpranises than it does to its principles, what have we left to trust to?“ ‘ Higginson urged further anti-slavery agitation. Even though the Wilmot Prouso failed, he said, the agitation it called forth did not 1311: for it prevented slavery from going into California. God wanted Nebrashe for freedom, and it behooved men to give to liberty what thou- sands give to slavery-Jour lives and our fortunes;--and to add, what slavery is just now in danger of forgetting, 'our sacred honor. "'36 25 Higginson's republican sympathies were never more strongly expressed than in his series of articles for the New York Tribune which he wrote as a correspondent for Horace Greeley on his trip into Kansas territory in 1856. The articles ran serially from September 12, 1856, to October 20, and, like those written for similar Republican newspapers (St. Louis Deuocret and the Chicago Tribune) they capitalized on real or imaginary atrocities and injustices of the pro-slavery element in the territory, and pointed up the pro-slavery bias of the government. A brief review of the situation in Kansas will clarify Higginson's attitude toward the government as seen in this series and his activities in the Ennigrant Aid Society. Hith the passage of the Kansas-Nebraska Act of May, 1851;, which repealed the Missouri Compromise of 1850, Kansas territory was opened to settlers from the north and the south who were told that they should decide by vote whether to exclude or countenance slavery. luvalry im- mediately broke out in an effort to decide which group would be stronger. Missouri settlers along the border naturally moved into Kansas to preempt land, and it was generally assumed that Missourians would make Kansas a slave territory. Northern anti-slavery men, however, set themselves the task of preventing the extension of slavery into Kansas. Eli Thayer of Worces- ter, Massachusetts, saw in the Kansas-Nebraska Bill a chance to make money and at the same time extend human freedom. With Amos :1. Lawrence, his treasurer, he formed the New England Enigrant Aid Society which sent Zmups to Kansas to form the anti-slavery town of Lawrence and to plot new villages such as Osawatomie, Manhattan, and 1bpeks.37 37 1955) Jay Monaghan, Civilian! on the Western Border, 18511-1865 (Boston, a P0 10 u‘l‘ ‘111 “w H II- II II ‘ I v I 26 In an effort to defend their stakes against the sudden influx of nortbemers, the Missourians- held a series of meetings during the smer of 1851; which denounced the migrant Aid Company and called upon the people of Xissouri to rally to the support of their institutions. 38 In the meantime, Senator David R. itchison of Missouri saw an opportunity ready-made for him to displace Thomas Hart Benton as Demo- cratic boss of Missouri. He played upon the fears of the slaveholding counties, and reused them to defend their interests against the in— coming Easterners. By doing so, Atchison expected to bring the slave- holding portion of the Whigs to his side and win the coming election in January. With his lieutenants, the Stringfellow brothers, Atchison cloaked his political ambitions behind his pretended zeal for slavery. When, however, in January, the Missouri legislature was unable to make a choice of senator, Atohison redoubled his efforts on the Kan- sas border by rousing further animosity toward Northern settlersas each group arrived. Governor Reader, sent by President Pierce, spent the winter of 1851:4855 studying the situation. He ordered an election for a terri- w torial legislature on March 30, 1855. In an effort to prevant fraud, he had a census taken to estimate the approximate number of legitimate Voters. By March, Atchison had exhorted enough Missourians and Souther- ners to migrate for the election to succeed in stuffing the ballot boxes with approximately eighty percent spurious votes of the 6207 cast.39 One free-state man was elected; the others, of course, were pro-slavery 38Samuel A. 'Johnson, "The Emigrant Aid Company in the Kansas Con- flict," Kansas Historical Quarterl , VI (February, 1937), p. 23. 39Monaghan, 32. £13., p. 20. a \ candidates. Au legislature was set up and reluctantly supported by ficvemor Reader. The Free-State settlers, were, naturally embittered by the elec- tion and began to denounce the Missourians as “Border Ruffiane.‘ The results of the election, however, served as a unifying factor to the hoe-Soil group. Under the leadership of Dr. Charles A. Robinson, one of the Enigrant Aid Company agents, the Free-State men joined in gathering ems and forces for a revolution. In August, 1855, Wilson Shannon of Ohio replaced Reader as governor. He immediately accepted the pro-slavery groupes "the people of Kansas.” His work in the territory, therefore, can be summarized in the resolutions of the “new and Order Party" or "States' Rights Party‘ which he assanbled at Leavenworth. Shannon's year of governorship was one of growing bitterness between the pro-slavery and free-soil camps. His position, however, was a difficult one. He had toface the hostility of the free-soil men and the frictions within the pro-slavery groups. During his term as governor, petty maraudings, murders, and miscellaneous acts of depredation on both sides occurred =4 throughout the Territory. On May 214, 1856, the notorious Pottowa tcmie massacre by John Brown took place. Within the same week, Captain Hen- 17 Clay Pete and his territorial militia surrendered to John Brown at the "Battle of Black Jack." Shannon was able to avert open warfare on Bull Creek in June only through the issuance of a proclamation ordering all anned bands to disperse. In the meantime, the Free-State leaders sent to Eli Thayer asking for Sharps' rifles and urged the fame tion of a Free-State constitution. At Lawrence, now the stronghold of the Free-State group, Robinson began 28 a sense of seven conventions out of which, in February, 1856, was fi- nally drawn up the Topeka Constitution. Free-Soil officials were in- stalled under the constitution and Kansas was now split into two rival cements. Feeling grew tense and skimishes continued between pro-slavery and Free-Soil settlers. The climax came on May 21, 1856, when Law- rence, the center of the Free—Soil settlers, was sacked by itchison and pro-slavery fighters. For the next three months Kansas was plunged into civil war. I During the war the settlers of both parties suffered severe hard- ships and poverty. The migrant Aid Compam' began to combine with its pleas for stock subscriptions an appeal for funds to relieve destitute Free-State settlers. Thousands of dollars were raised and sent to Kan- see to supply food and clothing to men who had abandoned their claims to take up arms in the Free-State cause. During June, Kansas aid com- nittees sprang up in nearly all the free states and in July a National Kansas Comittee was formed. These new organizations now took up much of the burden, so far borne by the Enigrant Aid Company, of arousing moral and political support for the Free-State cause, recruiting set- tlers, furnishing arms, and relieving the needy. By this time "Bleeding Kansas” had become a national issue. During the first six months of 1856, parties were organized under the auspices of these aid companies and assisted by the Enigrant Aid Company which supplied tickets at a reduced rate in several instances. Higginson, distressed at the lassitude of the North at this time of crisis in a letter to his mother wrote, I'm thousand dollars, withbur remittance, and our two parties of emigrants (which would not have gone by this time allo ' bloc'n Nehru set 0: hum 50m: 29 if I had not gone to work on it the first night I cams) are absolutely ALL that has yet been done by New England for Kan— sas, in this time of imminent need. This I say to show you how ill-prepared we are for such emergencies. The busy give no time and the leisurely no energy, and there is no organi- zation. I should except the Committee here, which has done admirably, and that in Concord, Massachusetts, and Dr. Howe, Sam Cabot, Charles Higginson, and a few others in BostothO Higgmson became an officer of one of the county committees and urged Worcester citizens and any others he could contact to join the emigrant trains to fight, if necessary, for freedom in Kansas. He was success- ful in sending off two parties, one led by Martin Stowall and a second by Dr. Calvin Cutter}l When Dr. Cutter's party was turned back from the Missouri river by the border ruffians, Higginson went to St. Louis to meet it, car- rying "funds to provide for the necessities of this body. " He was also “to report on the practicability of either breaking the river blockade or flanking it."h2 The party was re-routed through Iowa and Nebraska. Stowall‘s party had made its "rendezvous" in Worcester and set out on June 25. On the same day, the delegates from Kansas leagues and local Kansas committees in various Massachusetts towns met in convention in Boston and formed the Massachusetts State Kansas Committee, with George L. Steams as chairman and Patrick T. Jackson as treasurer.h3 Higgin- son became an agent of this State committee "which," he wrote to his hOMaIy Thacher Higginson (ed.), Letters 5153 Journals 2;: Thomas Wentworth Higg'nson, 18b6-l906:(Boston, 1921), p. 138. ”1110101., p. 137. MCheerful Yesterdays, p. 197. b3Samuel A. Johnson, The. Battle 95;: 31: Freedom: The New Engand Migrant il‘l Cogany 3.2 the Kansas Crusade (Lawrence, WAX—p. 203. 30 mother on June 26, "was appointed . . . chiefly on my urging. "M4 an August 29, he wrote again to his mother that l‘our menfiare nicely settled in the northern part of Kansas, which is more peaceful. Colonel Toplii‘f, who has just come from Lawrence, speaks quite encouragingly and thinks they can resist invasion.“45 In the same letter he hinted that he might have to go West, "to the Nebraska border, and perhaps some way inside.” ' Two days later matters were decided and he sent word home that he would leave for Chicago the next day, go to Nebraska City and probably into the Territory. "I allow six weeks, but it may be only a month, and hope to write a good deal to you and Mary and the 'Tribune,‘ though letters may be intercepted. Letters for me to be directed to James L. Armstrong, Topeka, Kansas.“6 While Higginson and his party were on their way to Kansas, events were occurring in the Territory which it has taken later historians to interpret. On August 21, Governor Shannon resigned and left the terri- tory. That same day, notice of his removal was received from Washington. With Simon's departure, bedlam broke loose. On August 25, Acting " Governor Woodson issued a proclamation declaring "the said Territory to be in a state of open insurrection and rebellion."h7 On September 2, 1856, John W. Geary was appointed Governor of the Kansas Territory. When Geary entered Kansas, he had orders from Presi- dent Pierce to secure peace at any price. MLetters and Journals 3:; Thomas Wentworth Higginson, p. 137. hSIbid., p. 139. 1161mm, p. 11.0. mJohnson, The Battle 9g 2g Freedom, p. 203. 31 3 Geary arrived at Lecompton on September 12. The next morning he issued two proclmations: I'one ordering all armed forces, including the existing territorial militia, to disband, and the other ordering all adult male citizens to enroll themselves for military duty.“48 He went to Lawrence to assure the people that they would be protected. He captured James Lane‘s and Colonel Harvey's free-state force (although Lane escaped) after their attacks at Oaawkee and Hickory Point. He dispersed Atohison’s ”Grand Azmy,‘t numbering 2700, who were camped at Franklin planning another major assault on Lawrence. .Higginson arrived at Nebraska City, Iowa, September 12, the same day Geary took office at Lecompton. His first article for the Tribune under the name, I'Worcester," (later reprinted as .3. 35:22 Throggh m) gives a picture of a frontier town. Nebraska City he describes as a handful of one-story cabins set on a bluff overlooking the muddy His- souri River. The village was comprised of three or four land offices and a tavern. The principal occupation of the inhabitants seemed to be to sit on the doorsteps and wait for real estate to rise. The emi- grants had to come in through Iowa because the river had been closed -" by the border ruffians. ”Migrants," Higginson says, "must toil week after week, beneath a burning sun, over a parched and endless prairie sometimes seeing no house in a day or two together, camping often with. out wood, and sometimes without water, and obliged to carry with them eVery eatsble they use.“ It was no wonder that many fell sick on the way, for, he adds, “I can only wonder at the patience and fortitude which the present emigrants have shown. . . . There is plenty of genuine halbid. , p. 231. 32 mgedy. . . . I converse daily with men who have sacrificed all their property in the service, and are ready to add their lives."‘9 The last mark be made to rebuke Eastern millionaires who thought themselves generous to give fifty dollars to the Kansas cause. Reports, he said, fran Topeka and Iawrance were vague and confused. hwrence was holdim its own, however, even though its people were an- tirely out of flour- and lead. The Missourians between Nebraska City and lame were so few that emigrant trains were molested. There was reason to believe, however, that General Richardson (United States military leader) had been drawn off for a time, to re-enter at a time agreed upon-Jprobably when their spies report that our emigrant train is ready to set fortlu'so Higginson constantly drew attention to the good conduct of the enigrant trains, of the Massachusetts and Maine men on their way to Little Nemaha, and of his own group of about one-hundred-forty who were resting at Nebraska City and purchasing supplies. The first article of this series is made up of rumored reports or hearsay, none of which had any foundation or authority. They were -' asserted with an assurance that was probably meant to create uneasi- neww among readers. The article is interesting as a reflection of the Kansas atmosphere rather than of any actual happening. Some of the more were that the Missourians expected to rule Iowa and Nebraska as well as Kansas, that the new steam ferry intended for emigrants was threatened, that hbor, Iowa, an anti-slavery town, was expecting an attack. F'1 1‘9; .1133 mm (Anti-Slavery Tract, No. 20, 1856), p. 2. 50 Ibid. ’ Pp. 2-30 33 With these dangers on their minds, the party moved through Plymouth and Mutton prepared for an attack by pro-slavery groups. Higginaon was a little disappointed that no danger arose and that he had no oppor- mity to point his gun at anything more formidable than a hawk which he brought down. Pro-slavery spies, Higginson said, mingled with the uigraut train, but, because the group was well-armed and determined, outbreaks or attacks were prevented. 51 Higginson' s unfavorable opinion of Governor Geary was formed on his way into Kansas. He met James 3. Lane who had recently escaped af- ter his attack on Hickory Point and brought news of Geary's disarma- ment proclamation. Lane had retreated northward to open up the road where General Richardson was preventing immigrants from coming along the 'Iane Trail" which Higginson and his party were following. Several discouraged returning parties also met Higginson's group with stories of gross injustices, tyrannies, and arrests by pro-slavery men. The bravest young men of Lawrence were put under arrest, charged with treason, murder, arson, robbery, and what not; while not a Pro-Slavery man was seized. This was the penalty they had to pay for defending themselves vigorously at last, and clearing their own soil from the invading Missourians. 'Tha worst enuny Kansas has ever had' they pronounced Governor Geary to be; and they were going to Iowa to wait for better times. 'Will you give up Kansas‘f' I asked. 'Nevert' was the reply from bronzed and hes rded lips, stern and terrible as the weapons that hung to the saddle-bow. 'We are scattered starved, hunted, half-naked, but we are not conquered yet. $2 The report falls into the general pattern of Tribune propaganda which Greeley probabh considered good copy. Higginson's personal encounter with Governor Geary, which he wrote about on September 28, continued his pro-conceived opinion of the man. A‘ fi— SlIbid. , p. 6. 52mm. 3’: Gary had been warned of a large armed force entering Kansas by way of lebrasha. He sent Colonel Walker and Colonel Preston with soldiers to prevent any such group from entering the Territory. Higginson's party was stopped for investigation, Colonel Preston placixg Higginson, Red- peth, and 'Governor' Robinson under arrest to be brought before Gover- nor Geary. The mistake was recognized immediately and the group was dismissed.53 Higginson's description of Geary is caustic in the ex- treme and shows his complete lack of understanding of Geary'e trouble- some position. The governor's eyes, he says, look at you I’with a very intensified nothing in them. . . . He appears to have energy of will, without real energy of cmracter; can do single acts of decision . . . but has neither the mental ability to understand the condition of Kan- sas, nor the moral power to carry out any systematic plan for its benefit." He plays on the fears and hatred: of both pro-slavery and free-soil par- ties and pits these forces against one another. He acts without law or precedent. He is disliked by both groups. Higginson concludes his tirade with: "I give this description of the new Governor of Kansas, because there is no public man in the United States whose blunders or errors may be more destructive. . . L He has undertaken a position so inconsistent and difficult that the wisest man would not fill it; and he is a great way from being the wisest."5h 53Colonel P. St. George Cook reported on September 28, 1856, from a camp near Iecompton: I have received no report from Colonel Johnston, but the Deputy Marshall has returned with Redpath, and reports that the large party met near Topeka are real imigrants. No definite in- formation has been received of the approach of the large armed body, but the Colonel will probably be instructed to remain near the northern boundary until after the election on the 6th proximo. Transactions of the Kansas Historical Societ , 1886-1888, F. G. Adams 0 3 Fakz—l , pa e 5&5 Ride Through Kansas, p. 9. 35 To his credit, 'Higginaon wrote of Governor Geary new years later: I formed that day a very unfavorable impression of Governor Geary, and a favorable one of Governor Robinson, and lived to modify both opinions. The former, though vacillating in Kansas, did himself great credit afterwards in the Civil War; while the latter did himself very little credit in Kansas politics, whose bitter hos lities and narrow vindictiveness he was the first to foster.5 He also stated that “in view of the fact that certain rifles which we had brought, and which had been left at Tabor, Iowa, for future en- ergencies, were the same weapons which ultimately armed John Brown and his men at Harper's Ferry, it is plain that neither Governor Geary's solicitude nor the military expedition of Colonel Preston was at all misplaced."56 In sharp contrast, however, to his dislike for Governor Gear-y is Higginson's high opinion of the enigmatic James H. Lane. His feeling about Lane is understandable, however, when considered in the light of Higginson's own temperament and his strong abolitionist senti- ments. Lane, to him, was the ”Marion" of Kansas. He was Higginson's concept of the man of action who saw wrongs to be righted and was wil- 11118 to correct them at his own risk. Higginson either did not know of Lane's unjust. incursions on pro-slavery groups or believed that in such cases Lane was in the right. It is true that Lane had taken Kansas and its Free-State people to his heart. He had appeared in Congress with the Topeka Constitution which was rejected on grounds of illegality. He had stmnped the Northern states, and with his natural gift of flamboyant oratory had aroused the North to the necessity of settling Kansas as a Free-Soil state. As the wagons of his 55Cheerful renew, p. 207. “me, p . 206. 36 migrants moved westward, the Missourians were terrified at more of the purported mothers of *hane's Army from the North.’ When he fore. saw the closing of the Missouri River, he is said to have made the so- called 'lane's Trail' through Iowa and Nebraska by erecting heaps of stones to mark out the way, known as I'Iaane's Chimneys'57 In Septem- ber, he left Kansas temporarily, after Governor Geary's proclamation, to assist emigrant groups to enter the Tbrritory. While Higginson and his party were resting in Nebraska City, Lane and his men rode into town. The leader was a thin man of middle age, in a gray woolen shirt, with keen eyes, smooth tongue, and a sug- gestion of courteous and even fascinating manners; a sort of Prince Rupert of humbler grade. This was the then celebrated Jim Lane, afterwards Senator James H. Lens, of the United States Congress; at this time cal- ling himself only ‘Hajobgeneral commanding the Free State Forces of Kansas.'5 lane remained in Nebraska City two days and Higginson "did something towards renewing the clothing of his band.“ He spoke to the citizens of the town with his usual fiery eloquence, impressing Higginson to such an extent that he sent a report of the speech to "some Boston paper." Lane gave "capital suggestions” to Higginson as to their march through the Territory, and "ended by handing me a bit of crunp- i led paper, appointing me a member of his staff and the rank of briga- dier-general. '59 As Higginson rode out of Nebraska City with Samuel F. ”Wendell Holmes Ste phensen, Political Career of General James 31. Lane; III, Publication of the Kansas State {E's-tonsil Society (Topeka, , D. 72s ”Cheerful res terdazs, p. 203. 59mm. , 13. 20h. :| 37 fappan the correspondent for the 3...! York Times and Boston Journal, he learned that Tappan also had a similar bit of paper in his possession. hosed, he wrote: lie tins found out that the Kansas guerilla leader carried out the habit of partisan chiefs in all history, who have usually made up in titles and honors what they could not bestow in actual emoluments. After this dis- covery Tappan and I rode on in conscious inward importance, 8 sort of dignity a deux, yet not knowing but that at any moment some third Brigadiehgeneral might cross our pa th.6O After the battle at Hickory Point from which Lane had escaped, a group of 105 prisoners were held at Ieccmpton, the pro-slavery head- quarters. Higginson went to visit them and found they were kept on charges of murder while pro-slavery prisoners under the same charge had been released. Higginson emphasized the wretched conditions an- der which they were kept. They had no heat or bedding, and very little food. In fact, he made an itmized list of the rations for a week which had been given the prisoners. This he followed by a few remarks regarding the goverxment. All these arrests have been made by the United States troops, whom it is the present policy of the people not to resist. But this patience cannot last forever; and I only .. repeat, what I have every day asserted, when I say that the election of Fremont is the only thing that can avert a bloodier conflict than has ever yet stained this soil. For myself, I do not believe that even that will do it. When not a single Pro-Slavery man is arrested, how can men help seeing that the power of the Union is sustaining Missouri. 61 it Lawrence, the first week of October, Higginson learned of the recent preparations for defense of the Free—Soil men against itchison's intended attack. Somewhat overwhelmed by the idea of two hundred courageous free-state defenders facing 2800 agreesors of the pro- 6°Ibid. , pp. zen-205. 61; Ride Through Kansas, p. 12. T'_——' ,3 slavery perv, Higginson extolled their efforts. - I was assured by Governor Robinson and a dozen others that among this devoted handful the highest spirits pre- vailed; they were laughing and Joking as usual, and only intent on selling their lives as dearly as possible. They had no regular commander, any more than at Bunker Hill; but the famous "Old Captain Brown' moved anong than, saying, 'Fire, low, boys; be sure to bring your eye to the hinder sight of your rifle, and aim at the feet rather than at the head.'52 Although Gesry was called upon, Higginson says, he did not come until evening, 'thus allowing time for the destruction of everything." In reality, there 'had been no attack. Geary had prevented it in a par- ley with itchison. Higginson's estimate of Iawrence, the Free-State town, was highly favorable. Food shortage and lack of ammunition were causing great hardship, but were bringing out the best qualities of the people. Ever since the Anthemr Burns affai - Higginson wrote: I have been looking for 3132.. I have found them in Kansas. The virtue of courage, . . . has not died out of the Anglo-American race. . . . It needs only circum- stances to bring it out. A single day in Kansas makes the American Revolution more intelligible than all Sparks or Hildreth can do. 63 To these frontier heroes, Higginson preached on Sunday, choosing as his text the one deployed by Rev. John Martin the Sunday after-he fought at Bunker Hill, "Be not ye afraid of them; remember the Lord, which is great and terrible, and fight for your brethren, your sons and your daughters, your wives and your houses. "6’4 On October 5, he left for Leavenworth, the pro-slavery town, to observe a Border Ruffian election which turned out to be a quiet 621b1ds ’ p. 150 631b1de, p. 1b. 6thid., 1.). 17. I _ 39 affair. 'Ee described the election: Is for the voting, nothim can be more free and easy. Strangers are pressed to take a share in it, as if it were something to drink. Nothing seems necessary except to hand in a ticket at a small office window and announce one's name; no questions appeared to be asked. I was urged to do this by bystanders, in spite of any assurances that I was merely a trave or, not a resident; they assured me it made no difference. is an added element of personal interest, Higginson said some of the Hissouri son were looking for a preacher who 'has his text and preaches religion; then he drops that and pitches into politics, and then he drops that too, and begins about the sufferin' niggers. '66 Since Hig- ginson left town that night and headed for St. Louis by ferry, he was not discovered, but the thrill of being important enough to be searched for by the enemy delighted him. On the “Cataract” bound for St. Louis, Higginson observed with displeasure some of the Southerners whom Atohison had recruited to en- ter Kansas to vote. Most of them were without money and grmhled at the fact that they had not been supported for a year, not given the fifty dollars bonus promised them by Atehison. Host of them spoke openly of selling their slaves for board and liquor, while Higginson lost himself in Harriet Beecher Stowe's anti-slavery novel, 9525!. Upon his return to Worcester, Higginson sent to the Tribune the last of his articles which sounded an alarm to the country. He entitled it "in Attempt at Prophecy," and itemized nine opinions he had fanned from his experiences in Kansas. M 6 SIbide, p. 190 66 Ibid. . wwwWfl l. be real question at issue is, not the invasions of His- socrisns nor the blockading of the river, but the enfor- cing of the bogus laws. The laws will exist, the Courts are still controlled by Missouri, and this is the real root of the difficulty, over which neither Governor Gesry nor any one else (except Congress) has any legiti- mate control. . . . 2. “More is not the slightest increase of lemony between the parties, but the contrary. Both sides expect to see the contest renewed. . . . 3. Both sides are making actual preparations for a renewal. The settlers are collecting arms, amunition and fresh men. The Missourians are doing the same. . . . 1:. Neither party desires peace, under the present auspices. S. [The Missourians are7 better armed and better drilled than amr previous invading force; and all agreed that at the battle of Hickory Point the Missourians showed more courage than ever before. 6. The whole tendency of Governor Geazy's policy is to exasperate both sides, and, indeed, actually to streng- than that. e e e 7. The reason why the strife is postponed, by tacit agree- ment, is easily told. The Missourians are waiting, in stronger and stronger hopes of Geary. The Free-State men suhuit to his aggressions, any because the election is coming. That, and that only, gives than patience; . . . Take away the dream of Fremont, and no power could make these injured men endure a week longer the combined oppression of the Administration and of Missouri. . . . 8. The trial of the Iecompton prisoners will furnish fuel to the flames and perhaps the final explosion. Host of them will, no doubt, be acquitted. But the Pro-Slavery men will not submit to the liberation of all, nor the Anti-Slavery men to the execution of any. 9. Look out, therefore, for trouble in Kansas, in Novmnber. Elect Fremont, and there will be a last desperate effort of Missouri to obtain possession of Kansas. In this they will rely on the aid of the United States Courts and troops, and will have it, whatever Governor Geary says. The policy of the Administration will be unchanged. In case of Buchanan's election, the whole power of Missouri, backed by the whole power of the Administration, will be directed upon Kansas. The two forces will be identified. They will be brought to bear as one; and thank God, resisted as one. . . . Kansas may E crushed, but not without a final strug- gle, more fearful than that of Hungary; a struggle which will comvulse a continent before it is ended, and separate forever those trio nations of North and South, which neither Union nor Constitution has yet welded into one. 67 W 671b1d0’ p. 2b.. hl Higgimon correctly put his finger on the some of the trouble affecting Kansas and the nation. is a Free-State smathieer he sup- ported Present but felt tint war was inevitable and that a split in the country no iminent. Higginson saw Geary's ”Peace” to be only tin quiet before the storm. Buchanan was elected over Frmont in lovuber, 1856, and secession was postponed another four years. Upon his return home, Higginson spoke on Kansas matters by re- quest before the Massachusetts and Vemont legislatures and was nominated by the Worcester Republicans for the state legislature on the Kansas issue. He refused the latter offer, however, feeling that his Free Church required his attention.68 In January, 1857, a ”State Disunion Convention" was called to consider the separation between free and slave states. Higginson was active in organising and carrying it through successfully. The Con- vention met at Worcester, Massachusetts, on January 15, to consider the expediency of dissolving the Union of the Free and Slave States. The grounds of the Call were: The result, &c, of the recent Presidential Election to involve four years more of Pro-Slavery Government, and a rapid increase in the hostility to be the offspring, not of party excitement, but of fundamental differences in education, habits and laws; believe the existing Union to be a failure, as being a hopeless attempt to unite under one Govermnent mo antagonistic systems of society, which diverge more widely with every year; and believe it to be the duty of intelligent and conggientious men to meet these facts with wisdom and firmness. 68Cheerful Yesterdays, p. 215. 69New York Wee Tribune (January 21:, 1857). Officers were: President: We 3 . Moe-Presidents: Thomas Earle, Wm. Lloyd Garrison, Gen. E. M. Hosmer, Wm. Ashby, W. Boyston, Dr. C. C. Field, Adam Ward, Daniel Mann; Secretaries: Alvin Ward, Charles Bingham, J. H. Isrrington, S. D. Tourtellote; Business Committee: General Higgin- son, Charles K. Whipple, E. Boyden, Wendell Phillips, Joel finith. Higginson road a letter from Senator Henry Wilson who disagreed with sees of the aims of the Convention. Wilson hoped that the Northerners would leave threats against the Union to the South and "proclaim their readiness to follow in the conflict of the future, the banner of Liber- ty and Union,” which would eventually, under the authority of Congress, ”overthrow the Slave Power in the Na tional Government and prepare the way for the peaceful emancipa tion of the bondnen by the consent of the Slaveholding Sta tea."70 The platform laid before the Convention and adopted was based upon the Anerlcan principle of Liberty as opposed "to the present prominent fact-Slavery.“ The conflict between these principles, which had been the histoxy of the nation for fifty years, only served to strengthen both parties and prepare the way for a desperate struggle. Nothing could be expected from the South, from the President, from the Senate or House of Representatives, nor from any political action. The elec- tion of Present had been the last hope of freedom, but now, "even could the North cast a united vote in 1860, the South has before it four years of annexation previous to tha t time. " The Disunion Conven- tion did not seek merely disunion, “but the more perfect union of the Free States by the expulsion of the Slave States from the Confederation, in which they have ever been an element of discord, danger and disgrace.“ Lastly, the realization of the existence of the Union is the chief guaranty of Slavery, the slaves of the whole world have everything to hope from its destruction. The "sooner the separation takes place, the more peaceful it will be; but that peace or war is a seconds}: M w 70mm. to consideration, in view of our present perils. Slavery must be conquered, 'peaoeably if we can, forcibly if we nust."71 Eigginson was satisfied with the Convention as he wrote to his mother. The Disunion Convention was very successful and comanded general respect, whatever the newspapers may say. I am sorry, dearest mother, you differ from me about it, but I never was more sure of being right. It is written in the laws of na- ture that two antagonistic nations cannot remain together; every year is dividing us more and more , and the sooner we see it, the better we can prepare for a peaceful and digni- fied policy.72 In July, a National Convention was called by Wendell Phillips, William Lloyd Garrison, Higginson and 61:00 others.73 This convention, however, was never held. Early in the same year, he spoke before the Massachusetts Anti- Slavery Society more openly than ever before against the partisanship and corruption of the Danocra tic government. The Dred Scott Decision was «the consummation of wickedness.“ The evils of Franklin Pierce's administration and the election of Buchanan were due to Democratic machinery. The Democrats identified themselves deliberately with the Pro-Slavery side because at the moment the South had the power in the nation. They were not interested in keeping the Northern States in the Union, because. they expected the North to steel back into the Democratic Party again when it saw that the South was the true power.”4 Higginson looked forward to a Republican victory in 1860, because he believed 71mm. 72m as 2.2992113 23. 3.1m: W__°m.__°rth_. But man, p. 77.. albums Wentworth Higginson, p. 18]. 71‘"Speech at the Tuanty-Fifth Anniversary of the Massachusetts Anti-Slavery Society," 322 Liberator (January 16, 1857 ). M, with Senator Wilson "that if the Republican party failed in the'Presi- dential election, . : . it would fail forever."75 The only hope for “ this “dark and troubled night" was Disunion. The conflict over slavery in Kansas should take place in the streets of Massachusetts, he said. Man from Massachusetts were being lulled into a sense of temporary security by the Personal Liberty Bill. The bill, Higginson insisted, was not strong enough to prevent a slave from being returned to his master. And Massachusetts must protect the slave, “not because he was a slave, but because he was a MAN!" With rousing eloquence, he added, "But, powerless as we may be to save, we have at least the power for this: we will make the streets of Boston bristle with her own bayonats, before you touch a hair of his head." His final plea again was Disunion. "If we want to meet the demands of the age, and pass on to the next age as worth remembering, we have got to be more than politicians, more than Republicans. We have got to come to the actual facts of our nation's existence, and look Disunion in the face."76 In1858, he saw signs of war. Although a new attitude seemed to have grown up in the North and the South, he said, in favor of the o Negro, and a current of opinion was in progress to perhaps settle the question of slavery on the soil where it existed, nevertheless, Higgin- son asked, "Is it destined, as it began in blood, so to end? Seriously and solemnly, I say, it seems as if it were."77 Within the next year the Harper’s Ferry incident brought the question of slavery to its 75lbid. 761bid. 77"Speech at the Fifth Anniversary of the New York Anti-Slavery Society," 1113 Liberator (May 28, 1858)- 15 highest point by the. fanatic, John Brovm. Higginson had heard of Brown in Kansas and mentioned him in one of his articles for the Tribune. Af- ter meeting him at Boston, Higginson and several other abolitionists were completely won over to his side. is an abolitionist's stand against the United States government, Higginsou's part in the John Brown episode, though minor, was the logi- cal outgrowth of his disunion policy and a kind of climax to his aboli- tion activities. In Cheerful footage Higginson wrote that he was not certain when he first not John Brown. It may have been on his trip through Iowa toward Kansas, for he remembered seeing a fugitive slave freed by Brown at that time. If, by chance, the two men had met before 1857, the event was not an outstanding one to Higginson. Early in 1857, John Brown travelled through the East in order to raise funds to further the Abolitionist cause in Kansas. Villard78 points out that there was at this time no communication by Brown to his Eastern friends of the Harper‘s Ferry attack. His aim, apparent- ly, was to defend Kansas by raiding Missouri or by attacking slavery Iran some other vulnerable spot. On January 5, 1857, shortly after Brown's arrival in Boston, Higginson received an invitation from Frank Sanborn to meet Brown in Boston. There is no evidence that Higginson attended this meeting. it Ssnborn's urging, however, he did raise money for Brown, thinking of him perhaps as a new force 78Oswald Garrison Villard, John Brown: _A_ Biogrspg Fifty Yes After (Boston, 1910), p. 271.. " b in the anti-slavery novseent. During his stay in the East, Brown was successful in obtaining nosey, munition, and supplies from the Massachusetts State hip-ant Cunittee, then under the chairmanship of Wrge L. Steams. Steams, Frank Sanborn of Concord, Gerrit Smith of Peterboro, New York, Theo-v dore Parker, Samuel Gridley Howe of Boston, and Higginson, as members of the Massachusetts State Cmittee, took a special interest in Brown, keeping him in supplies and money. The National Kansas Com- mittee, however, refused him money and ammunition, but sent him sup- plies for his men. He also received financial help personally from the wealthy philanthropist, Gerrit Smith, mentioned above. Higgineon, beaver, was unable to give much assistance at this time, and the Wor- cester meeting held for Brown on the 23rd and 25th of March produced very slim financial returns. Brown's impatience to begin his work ' in Kansas, the lack of sufficient funds to begin operations in spite of his own efforts and that of his friends, disheartened him. He complained to Higginson, "My anxiety to secure a 51933 935.3%: and to go off at once, is becoming extremely oppressive, and my heart grows sad in the fear of a failure of the enterprise."79 Late in Ha rch, Brown had met and enlisted the services of Hugh Forbes, a suave adventurer who had served in Italy under Garibaldi in the unsuccessful revolution of lBhB-h9. Forbes was hired to train groups of "voluntary-regulars” to operate first in Kansas and later in Virginia. Unfortunately, Brown confided his Harper’s Ferry 79Springfield, Massachusetts, April 1, 1857 (Higginson Collection in the Boston Public Library). I am indebted to Dr. Benjamin B. Hickok for the use of his microfilmed reproduction of this valuable collection. 1:? plans to” Forbes long before any of Brown's benefactors in the East were aware of such a project. The next year, the threats of Forbes to re- veal Brown's plans publicly were alarming enough to cause a postpone- ment of activities for a whole year. Brown finally set out for Kansas after many delays, and reached Tabor, Iowa, with his supplies and ammunition on August 7. His alleged purpose for this trip and his subsequent entrance into Kansas was to defend the Free Soil interests in Kansas against subversive attack fran pro-slavery parties. However, by this time (1857), Kansas 'Derri- tory had passed through its “bleeding“ phase and was now comparatively peaceful. A. Free State election held on August 9, two days after Brown's arrival at labor, indicated the growing strength of Free State power over the pro-slavery party. Kansans were settling their dif- ferences at the polls rather than on the battlefield. To all ap- pearances, Brown and his ”volunteers-regulars“ were unnecessary. For unknown reasons, Brown delayed at Tabor much longer than his Eastern friends thought necessary. Higginson, impatient with waiting for action, wrote to Sanborn about it, and received a letter defending Brown and asking for more funds. As an added incentive to Higginson, Sanborn wrote, "I believe he is the best Disunion champion you can find, and with his hundred men, when he is put where he can raise them, and drill them (for he has an expert drill officer with him) will do more to split the Union than a list of 50,000 names for your Convention, good as that is."80 80Quoted by Villard, o . 32].}, 9o 303, from The Thomas Went- worth Higginson Papers of he Kansas Historical Sociew. e—e r-_=e-. _— flan} {b 4 at, V1 hm: They n 2h, mined left 1 hub to ope M: m but 1:: I 118 It was not, however, until love-her that Join Brown entered Kansas. I. was in Lawrence on Hovuber 5,81 mining there but a short tins. Suddenly, wintever the cause, Brown lost interest in the Kansas situa- tion and turned his efforts to his Virginia plan, the wild echoes which during the following year absorbed such of the time, energy, and money of his Eastern friends. The most important result of this visit to Kan- sas, Villard states, was his recruiting his first man for the Harper's Ferry raid.82 During December, Brown moved his group of men to Springdale, Iowa, during which time the details of the Virginia venture were discussed. They reached the home of the friendly Quaker, John H. Painter, on the 29th, then moved to the farmhouse of William Maison, where they re- nained to train for the Virginia raid. 33 On January 15, 1858, Brown left for another visit to the East, reaching the home of Frederick Douglass at Rochester, New York, on the 28th. It was from here tint Brown wrote to Higginson that he was in hiding and desired Higginson to operate at Worcester for funds. He hoped to talk things over with him confidentially at a later date.“ Higginson'e reply was cordial but not enthusiastic. He was “always ready to invest money in treason but at present have none to invest.'85 He had other fugitives to look 81Villard, 22. 53}, 1). 30b. 82113111., p. 308. His party at this time consisted of Owen Brown, A. B. Stzvens, Charles Moffett, C. P. Tidd, Richard Richardson, Richard Realf, LF. Parsons, W. M. Ieanan, John E. Cook, and John H. Kagi. 83mm, p. 312. “February 2, 1858 (Higginson Collection). Also in Cheerful Yes terdaE, pp. 216-217. 8silorcester, February 8, 1858 (Higginson Collection). -r.———————————~. . 1,9 _ f F oftor, and had Just undertaken to raise funds for the Underg'sand Rail- road in Kansas. Ho profisod, however, to try to do something. Bron was mucus to hold a meeting at the home of Gerrit Slith I in Poterbore, New York, and wrote to Higginson to Join him. Higgin- son did not attend the meeting even though Sanborn urged him to do so.” Nor did George L. Steams. Villard points out that Brown's letters at this time failed to interest them becanse of their inde- finiteneos.” At the meeting in an upper room of the Smith mansion (according to Frank samborn)88 Brown laid his plan for a campaign somewhere in slave territory east of the Alleghanies. Almost a month later, Higginson received another invitation from Brown to meet him, this time at the American House, Hanover . Street, Boston.89 He accepted the invitation, as did Theodore Par- ter, 8. G. Howe, F. B. Sanborn, and G. L. Steams. The magnetic personality of Brown, his apparent forthrigitness and sincerity at- tracted Higginson to such an extent that from the time of this meeting to the end of his life, Higginson was one of Brown's most ardent sup- porters and defenders. At the meeting it was decided that $1000 would be the sum raised for Brown's project and that each of those present would be assessed $.00. Inunediately after the meeting, Brown left for Phila- delphia under the alias of Nelson Hawkins "to prepare agencies for 8600ncord, February 19, 1858 (Higginson Collection). 87Villard, 22o iii-Es, pt 3200 33F. B. Sanbern, Recolzeqféflfta 2.17. 59_"E_._nt‘J. Xfflfi (BOS’WI: 3-909): I: P0 1,450 8930315011, March 1,, 1858 (Higginson Collection). 50 E his business near where he will begin operations. '90 Another meeting was held at Dr.) Howe's home on the 20th to which Higginson was invited. Because Higginson was unable to attend, Sanborn sent him an account by letter, telling him of the financial status of the group and concluding, "The enterprise still looks very hopeful to speculative peoplc--and I hope continues to please you. '91 George Steams reported to Higginson on April 1, that 8375 had been collected thus far. By April 20, Higginson had his assessment, but was urged by Sanbom to do more if he could because ”Ihwkins" had left Canada for the West on business with his enterprise. "He has found in Canada several good men for shepherds, and if not em- barrassed by want of means expects to turn his flock loose about the 15th of May.'92 Sanborn kept Higginson informed of Brown's movements, telling him on May let, that "115me will be at Chatham, Canada West, some day next week with a company of 12 to 20 shepherds and would like to meet some friends from this quarter. Can you make it conven- I. ient to see him thererfl93 None of the Boston group attended the meetings held in Canada by Brown, which he called ”Conventions." It was at these meetings that a plan of organization entitled, "Provisional Constitution and Ordi- nances for the People of the United States" was drawn up and adopted. 908aan to Higginson, Concord, March 8, 1858 (Higginson Col- lection). 91March 21, 1858 (Higginson Collection). ”Concord, April 20, 1858 (Higginson Collection). ”May 1, 1858 (HigginSon Collection). ?“j—' 51' ”The Preamble, voided by Brown, defined slavery as ‘35; of one portion of its: citizens upon another portion.‘ The word ‘war' Villard points out, was the keynote to Brown's philosopm, 'and explains better than anything else why it was consistent with his devout religious charac- ter for him to kill, and to plunder supplies in Kansas, and to take up was against slavery itself. “91‘ Before the Conventions met in Canada, Hugh Forbes, like the vil- lain in a plot, began to write to the New England group and to Senator Wilson in Washington, threatening to expose Brown's plans publicly. Sanborn, in the same letter quoted above, wrote to Higginson concerning . Forbes's action: '. . . the other day I got a letter from Hugh Forbes which looked equally interesting that our friends speculation should not-go on. Whether Forbes hows where H. is or what he is doing I can't say, but it would be a bad thing to have the N. Y. Herald giving statistics, quoting prices, etc., while we are hoping to steal a march on buyers and sellers."95 on May 5, Sanborn's letter to Hige ginson suggested that with the new aspect of affairs presented by Forbes's letter the project might have to be postponed for the present, ... for Forbes knew the details of the place and the names of those helping Brown. 96 Sanborn's letter alarmed Higginson, and his indignation at the idea of delay is felt in this note to John Brown. Brattleboro, Vt. Dear Friend Sanborn writes an alarming letter of a certain H. F. who wishes to veto our veteran friend's project entirely. “Willard, 32. 3i}, p. 3314. 951!” l, 1858 (Higginson Collection). 9600ncord, May 5, 1858 (Higginson Collection). T—1 52 he the nan is I in. no conception-abut I-oprotest against any postponement. If the thing is Eosmned, it 22. 22st- ned forever-for H. roan do as much harm next year as % a. s malice must be in some way put down or outwittedu- and after the move is once he , his plots will be of little importance. I move %t we have gone too far to go back without certain failure, and I believe our friend the veteran will think so too. Cordially '1'. w. Higginson97 The problem presented by Forbes's threats was a source of con- atarnation to the others of the New England group. By May 11, they had agreed (except Higginaon and Howe) that Brown's project should be deferred for a year, during which time Forbes could be sent to Europe where he would be far from Brown's affairs. Concerning Higginson's attitude, Sanbom wrote, "I am glad you stand so strong for the other side-for the matter will thus be fairly argued-abut I think when H. comes to see F's letters and knows how minute his informs tion-«he will attach more importance to his opposition than he did on the 5th of May when he wrote men-saying that he would go on it supplies did not fail him."98 Higginson remained firm in his decision. Brown returned to Boston on May 31 and held a meeting. Hig- ginson was absent. The decision of a year's postponement of plane was announced to Brown who later held a conversation with Higginson concerning it. Higginson recorded the conversation in a carefully Preserved memorandum. He found that Brown agreed with him and "con- sidered delay very discouraging to his 13 men and to those in Canada." Brown believed that the others of the Boston group were not men of :7(Higginson Collection). Also quoted by Villard. 93. 22.9. P- 33 . ”Concord, May 11, 1858 (Higginson Collection). ?i— . 53 acflon, but were intimidated by Senator Wilson's letter and overrated the obstacles.” ' Since Higginson had no voice at the meeting but had protested sufficiently to the other members of the group for them to understand his views, nothing further could be done by him about the decision. Therefore, he Neither did he have the financial means to help Brown. had to yield to the others as Brown had yielded. 'nie postponement was not the only precautionary measure insis- ted upon by the "secret six“ (as the group was later known). Brown was to return to Kansas principally to deceive Forbes. But after his arrival in Kansas, his future plans were to remain unknown to the New England group. They would assist him with money and sup- plies, but did not wish to assume the responsibility which knowledge would give them and which might later incriminate them. Higginson's attitude on this point is not clear, but it can be ascertained to a certain degree from his later writings and from his correspondence that he was totally ignorant of Brown's plans for the attack at Harper's Ferry. He wrote in Cheerful Yesterdays: Brown's plan was simply to penetrate Virginia with a few comrades, to keep utterly clear of all attempts to create slave insurrection, but to ge+ together h-mds mi families of” fugitive slaves, and than ‘09- ;jzicirrl by siren-ts. If he could establish them permanently in those fastnesses, like the Haroons of Jamaica and Surinam, so much the bet- ter; if not, he could make a break from time to time, and take parties to Canada, by paths already familiar to him. All this he explained to me and others, plainly and calmly, and there was nothing in it that we considered either objectionable or impracticable. 100 S’9June l, 1858 (Higginson Collection). looCheerfnl Yesterda , pp. 220-221. 5b In his biography of John Brown, Higginson wrote, "Host of his friends in the Eastern states knew nothing more of his movement until it was announced that he had taken possession of the United States ar- senal at Harper's Ferry.'101 1'1” Ham”! Ferry attack began during the night of October 16, 1859. At dawn on October 18, Brown, A. D. Stevens, two Negroes, and Edwin Coppoc were captured. Seven men escaped to Canada and the ne- nainder of the party of twenty-two were killed in the skimish. Higginson described his reaction to the news in his Cheerful tester-days: I went into a newspaper shop in Worcester one morning, and heard some one remark casually, 'Cld Osawatomie Brown has got himself into a tight place at last.‘ I grasped eagerly at the morning paper, and read the whole story. Naturally, my first feeling was one of remorse, that the men who had given him money and arms should not actually have been by his side. In my own case, however, the Justification was perfectly clear. Repeated postpone- ments had taken the edge off from expectation, and the whole enterprise had grown rather vague and dubious in w mind. I certainly had not that degree of faith in it which would have led me to abandon all else, and wait nearly a year and a half for the opportunity of fulfill- ment; and indeed it became obvious at last that this longer postponement had somewhat disturbed the delicate balance of the zealot's mind, and had made him, at the very outset, defy the whole power of the United States govermnent, and that within easy reach of Washington. Nothing of this kind was included in his original plans.102 Higginson's comment on Brown's state of mind as being "somewhat dis- turbed" (written in 1900) is different from that of his biography of Brown (written in 1888). Here he quotes Governor Wise of Virginia as saying: 101mm“ WentHorth Higginson, ”John Brown," 529191-0113 C 10_ 33222 9; American Biograpg, I (1888). £— lozcmerfUI Yeaterdayfi, p. 2230 55 'They are mistaken who take Brown to be a madman. He is a bundle of the best nerves I ever saw; cut and thrust and bleeding and in bonds. He is a man of clear head, of courage, fortitude, and simple ingenuousness. He is cool, collected, indomitable; and it is but just to him to say that he was hmnane to his prisoners, and he inspired me with great truSt in his integrity as a man of truth.' This opinion, [Higginson adds] coming from the man whose immediate duty it was to see him tried and executed as a felon, may be regarded as a final and trustwortl'y estimate.1° Perhaps it is safe to say that his remarks in Cheerful Yesterdays is actually his final estimate. The other five men of the Boston group reacted variously to the news and to the trial and investigation. Frank Sanborn, who had so strongly urged Higginson to aid John Brown, suddenly de- sided to 'try change of air for my old complaint,"th and disap- peared into Canada. When the Mason Investigating Committee spread a dragnet over the North for Brown's accomplices, Sanborn declared several times in letters to Higginson that he was deter- mined not to appear before the Committee in Washington, even though he was promised protection from bodily harm by Mason. If he had to appear, he would appeal for a hearing in l‘lassaclmsetts.10S George Steams and Samuel Gridley Howe also went to Canada. It was from there that Howe published a "card“ in the New York Tribune, * November 16, 1859, which implied that he was innocent of any compli- City with John Brown. Higginson was indignant at Howe's evasiveness. J(2'93“.16hn Brown," Appleton's Cyclogaedifi, I, p. 1407. loh]’ortland, October 21, 1859 (Higginson Collection). 105Fer a complete narrative of Sanborn's actions, see Benjamin B. Hickok's The Political and Literary Careers 35 E. g. Sanborn (Unpublished doctoral dissertation: Michigan State University, 1953), Pp. 126-266. “1 lie wrote to Howe, I know how skilfully that letter is written. Since language was first invented to conceal thought there has been no more skilful combination of words. But the uni- vernal interpretation of all intelligent readers, not previously enlightened, must be--that you disclaim all knowledge not merely of the precise time and place . . . of John lggown's great drama--but of the entemise Ell—3.1101 - Howe replied three months later that he had not intended to create a false impression by his words. Villard states that when Dr. Howe appeared before the Mason Calumittee‘ he made every effort to baffle his enquirers,107 whose questions were so unskilfully framed, Sanborn said, that witnesses could, "without literal false- hood, answer as they did. "108 Sanborn'a defense of Howe brougnt forth the taunt from Higgisson, "Is there no such thing as honor amongpconfederates?"lo9 As Villnrd points out, "Making all due allowances for the heat of the moment as expressed in Colonel Hig- ginson's letter, it does not seem even at this date that his rea- soning was far wrong. "110 Gerrit Suith's reaction to the Harper's Ferry raid was even more lamentable than Rowe's. On November 10, Higginson learned that Gerrit Smith was consigned to the Utica Asylum for the Insane under the care of Dr. Gray.lll 0n the 15th of November, he received a ”Worcester, November 15, 1859 (Higginson Collection). 1°7vmard, 32. 311., p. 532. 1°8Recollections o__f Seventy" Years, p. 230. lO9Worcester, November 17, 1859, a first draft (Higginson Collection). noVillard, 92. c__i__t., p. 533. 111E. B. Clarke to Higginson, New Bedford, Massachusetts, "I see by the morning's paper that Gerrit finith is insane." (Higginson Collection). 57 letter are! diaries D. miller, mth's son-in-lav, to the sane effect. he correspondence preserved by'Higginson contains only a for reference; to Gerrit Mth alter Bl-osnfs sentence. Among then is meant: remark to Hone in the letter quoted above, “but Gsrrit ath' s insanity-rand your letter-are to me the only the bad results of.- this whole affair.”n2 Smith's fear for his social prestige and political position charged him e; break down. He remained in the Utica Asylum only until December 29, long enough to escape ques- tioning by the Mason Investigating Comdttee. When he returned to his home, be destroyed all papers connected with his part in the affair and denied openly any complicity with John Brown, a stand he maintained until his death. ’ ' Stearns returned from Canada to testify before the Mason Com- mittee in Washington , February 211, 1860. Unafraid, he defended Brown as the "representative man of the century, as Washington was of the lasto'll3 Theodore Parker had been in Europe before the Harper' s Ferry raid, in a vain effort to recover his health. Parker with Higginson were the only two of the Boston mp willing to take the consequences of their actions. Bigginson remained in Worcester "laying out a new bed of crocuses and tulips for the spring," he wrote to his nother.11h He believed - nzFirst draft of a letter to Here, November 17, 1859 (Higginson Collection). 113moted by Villard from the Mason Report, p. 2u2. nhLetters 351.9. Journals 23 homes Wentworth Riga! son, p. 85. 58 flat he would not. be molested if.he stood his ground. Hasondoesnotwi-shtohave JohnBrownheartflyde- fended before the committee 8: the .co‘mtry-mor does he wish to cause an mute, either in Massachusetts or Washington. He wIiEFs—sinply to say that he tried Ber evidence 8: it. was refused him. If his witnesses go to Cmda or..Europe, he is freed from all responsibility.n5 He further. reasoned, ”It rather looked as if, having befriended Brown' a plane so far as we understood them, it was our duty to stand our. ' ground and. give himour moral support, at least on the witness stand."l'3-6 For his praiseworthy attitude Higginson has since been celebrated by F Stephen Vincent Benet in his i213 Brown’s 933.117 Higginson' s '.moral support" of Brown took several forms. Judging by a letter to'him from Charles-W. Elliottue of New Haven, Higginson tried to find a competent lawyer to defend Brown during his trial. he man recomended'to him by his correspondent was William Curtis Noyes who was willing to undertake the task. Higginson, however, was not the only one who sou'glt counsel for Brmm. John W. LeBarnes, of Boston, engaged, at his own expense, the young lawyer, George H. Hoyt, both as a lawyer for Brown and a spy for Brown's Boston friends. To this 11531 on to Sanborn, Worcester, February 3, 1860 (Higginson Collection . Villard says this letter was never sent. 116Cheerful Yesterdays, p. 2214. 117 In the anxious North, The anxious Dr. Howemost anxiously Denied all godly connection with the raid, And Gerrit auith conveniently went mad For longenough to sponge his mind of all Memory of such an unsuccessfixl deed. Only the tough, swart-minded Higginson Kept a gin decency, would not deny. Euphen gincent Benet, John Brown's E (New York, 19141): Po 56: . 9-2 . _ . . _ 118October 2 5, 1859 (Higginson Collection). 59____ effect, Higginson wrote to his mother, October 27. We have done what we could for him by sending counsel and in other ways that must be nameless. By we I mean Dr. Howe, W. Phillips, J. A. Andrew, and myself. If the trial lasts into next week, it is possible to make some further arrangements for his legal protection. But beyond this no way seems open for anything; there is (as far as one can say such a thing) no chance for forcible assistance, and next to none for sfiatagem. . . . Had I been a lawyer, however, I should probably have gone on at once, to act at least temporarily as his counsel. A young man from Boston named Hoyt has gone on for this, and probably Montgomery Blair, of Washington, will be there to-day, to conduct the case. Hoyt, on his arrival in Maryland, was at first looked upon with suspicion, but he succeeded in acquainting Brown with the primary pur— pose of his arrival--a plan of "forcible assistance ," as Higginson put it, to rescue Brown from prison. Brown immediately and vehement- ly opposed the idea. His Northern friends120 vainly hoped that he would change his mind, and even a second and more emphatic warning failed to deter them. Higginson believed that bringing Mrs. Brown down from the North would be the strongest inducement that could be used to secure Brown's consent to their plans. He went to North Elba, New York, and personally escorted Mrs. Brown as far as Boston where she was received with open-hearted sympathy and kindness. This trip he described in an essay, "A Visit to John Brown's Household," which first appeared in Redpath‘s life 9_f_ Captain io_h_r_1 212113.121 From Boston, Mrs. Brown was taken to Baltimore by J. Miller Mem, 3. leading Philadelphia abolitionist. On November 5, Higginaon 119Letters and Journals of Thomas Wentworth Higginson, pp. 85-86. l"ZOJ. W. LeBarnes, F. B. Sanborn, James Redpath, R. J. Hinton, and Higginson, ibid., p. 85. 121% Visit to John Brown's Household," Contemporaries, II, pp. 219-2h3. mummmmmw unseen unredeemed 60 received a telegram from Brown telling him not to send Hrs. men to him. Mrs. Brown received the telegram on November 8, Just as, she was boarding the train for Harper's Ferry. Higginson was disappointed and wrote to Hoyt who replied from Boston, "I know nothing about Mr. Brown's motives for refusing to see Mrs. 13. I 33.5 yr. conjectures are probably correct."122 Higginson later believed that Brown re- fused to see his wife'possibly distrusting his own firmess, or wishing to put it above all possibility of peril."123 In the meantime, Higginson had distributed {circular to raise money‘for Brown's defense, which was signed by himself, S. E. Sewall, s. e. Howe, anth. w. snereen. The circular together with notices in the newspaper, brought in sums of money from various sources. They also excited southern readers who sent him insulting letters which probably added fuel to Higginson's zeal for Brown‘s welfare. By November 11;, Higginson, in another effortfito save Brown's life ,7 had joined a group headed by Lysander Spooner who formed the audacious plan of capturing Governor Wise and holding him as a hostage. J. W. LeBarnes, writing to Higginson on November 1h, as- sured him that the deed could be dene.12h By November 20, LeBarnes had found a man to act as pilot of a boat for the Richmond expedi- tion, "if necessary money can be had."125 He believed his agent could bring a big into Richmond under—the pretense of selling it without exciting remark since vessels were being sold there. he 122November 7, 1859 (Higginson Collection). 123Gheerfll1 Yesterdays, p. 228. lZl‘hkchange Street, Boston (Higginson Collection). leHigginson Collection. - 61 expeation, however, would cost $0,000 or flS.000-~$10,000 to start with. By this time, LeBarnes did not think well enough of the scheme to go himself, and would not wish any of their men to be led into it. The others in the scheme were in favor of it, but not too enthusiastic. lfter a second thought, it was decided, that since the judge, not the Governor, had passed sentence on John Brown, what good would come of the kidnapping? .LeBarnes did not ' see that Brown could be saved through such action. He was willing to continue as. originally planned, if Higginson could supply the money. The plan was short-lived, since the money was not forthcoming. ' The plan was dropped, however, in favor of one no less daring-- to attack the prison and rescue Brown forcibly. Some German revolu- tionists in New York, known to LeBarnes, were willing to make the at- tack. In a short time, LeBarnes said, a hundred or more men could be ready to go as a reinforcement to a group of men in Ohio, who, led by John Brown, Jr. , were supposedly planning to move on to Charlestown for the same purpose. If the Ohioans were not prepared, LeBarnes knew of from fifteen to . twenty or twenty-five men who would follow him, Richard J. Hinton, and other Kansas leaders}:26 Frank Sanborn also had a part in the scheme. On November 21;, he left a note for Higginson urging him to include Redpath in the Ohio group.127 Within another three days, the plans of the attackers were rough- 1y formulated. "Their plan of escape would probably be to seize the horses of the cavalry companies. The attack to be made after either —_‘ 126LeBarnes to Higginson, New York, November 27, 1859 (Higginson Collection). 127Worcester, 1; p.111. , (no signature). (Higginson Collection). 62 Yednesday night, or Egg-4t the 2913' [Lou the day of Brown's emeeutiey. The men were confident of success but demanded a hundred, dollars each and assurance that survivors woum be provided a place of refuge and the families of the others would be taken care of. The weight of responsibility fell upon the shoulders of Higginson, can'- born, and the other Boston men. "It is from you in Boston to say 'go' or 'stay‘," wrote LeBarnes in'the same letter. fifteen hundred or ; thousandldollars was the sum needed by Tuesday, the 29th, and five hundred or a thousand dollars the day after. LeBarnes wanted a I definite answer on the following day.128 > Bedpath, who had been requested to go to Ohio to see how matters stood with the party of John Brown, Jr., delayed leaving the East un- til too late. George H. >Hoyt', returning from the Western ReserVe brought word to Sanborn that "nothing is doing in 0hio."129 Sanborn then gave up the enterprise, telegraphed LeBarnes to return, because "nothing could be done.“ LeBarnes, in turn, telegraphed to Higginson, GObject abandoned."l3O . The desperatevefforts of these men to assist John Brown were sincerely appreciated by Brown and his family. Higginson‘s own per- sonal interest in the family dates from his first visit to North Elba, after which he kept them informed of events by letter, newspapers and Clippings. The gratitude of the family was expressed by Annie Brown when she wrote: 128New York, November 27, 1895 (Higginson Collection). 129Boston, November 28, 1859 (Higginson Collection). 130November 28, 1859 (Higginson Collection). 63 Before you came, all looked dark and dreary to us, we had not received one word of comfort from any source. I had hardly seen a sndle on the faces of any of our fauly for more than a week, but you could not have failed to notice how happy we all seemed, and it was real heartfelt happiness. How mch sunshine you bran t into our desolate home is left only for 113 to tell.1 John Brown also felt the sympathy extended by Higginson toward himself and his family, and wrote to him two weeks before his death thanflng him for being "a friend in need."132 ‘ John Brown was executed on December §, 1859, in spite of Northern sentiment which regarded him as a martyr and symbol of freedom. Of his last moments on the scaffold, his admirable calmness and courage, High ginson wrote later: 9 His career is remarkable for its dramatic quality, for the important part he played in events preliminary to the goat civil war, and for the strong and heroic traits shown in his life and death. He belongs to a class of men whose permanent fame is out of all propor- tion to their importance or contemporary following; and indeed he represents a type more akin to that seen among the Scottish coventers of two centuries age than to any- thing familiar in our day.133 Brown's execution did not close this episode of activities. Two of Brown's men, A.D. Stevens and A. Hazlett, were still imprisoned uniting sentence which was passed on February 11;, 1860, in spite of Northern sentiment, which ran high in their favor. Higginson readily agreed to a plan to reams the prisoners by force. He began (with Mrs. Brown's permission)13h by giving three hundred dollars to 131North Elba, Essex 00., New York, November 1h, 1859 (Higginson 601100151011). moherienom, Jefferson 00., Virginia, November 22, 1859 (Hig. cinson Collection). 133Apploton's gyclopaedia 23 American BioEaphz, p. h06. 13“Annie Brown to '1‘. W. Higginson, North Elba, January 11, 1860 (Higginson Collection). ‘HM‘LW W "MN m M. ”Mam .m w.» I“ H. N ha a. re 6h 3. J. Hinton to pay Einton's expenses to Kansas where he was to enlist the personal services of Captain James Montgomery of Kansas. Montgomery hesitated to leave Kansas at the ties, believing that his services were needed there‘.135 He finally decided to join the rescuers in Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, where all were to meet, and by February 10, was able to telegraph Bigginson that he had "eight machines finely" and that he was intending to leave st. Joseph on’the 13th.136 To this news Higginson replied, strangely enough, “Too late-"send back‘machines and come here yourself.“137 ‘Lho message must not have reached Montgomery, for five days later, a telegram from R. J. Hinton [alias J. H. Reed] in Pitts- burg announced the arrival thereof eight "machines". awaiting transfer.138 The men reached Harrisburg in the guise of cattle men looking for bar- gains. On February 19th, Higginson wrote to his wife from Harrisburg (where he had assumed the name of Charles P. Carter) that if the ground continued to be covered with snow, or if another snowfall oc- curred, "the whole must be abandoned even were all else favorable."139 Captain hontgomery was to spend part of the week reconnoitering. - Montgomery and Soule' went to Charleston to examine the region. Soulé, playing the role of an intoxicated Irishman, was locked in the 1351‘1lound City, Sim 00., Kansas Territory, February 1, 1860 (Big. ginson Collection.) 136Leavenworth, February 10, 1860 (Higginson Collection). 137worceeter, January 13, 1860 (Higginson Collection). 133January 18, 1860 (Higginson Collection). 139Higginson Collection. llflwwwmmrmmm mumbli. I 65 sane Jail with Stevens and Hazlett. He informed the men of the plan for their rescue which they tbeusst impossible homes of the heavy guard and the regard they had for the life of their kind Jailer, Cap- tain Avian-ho After his discharge, Soule' returned to Harrisburg to relay the messages given him by Stevens and Hazlett. hontgomery, in the meantime, had found the countryside on the alert and the contimed heavy mews became an impassable barrier to the success of the venture . The obstacles to be overcome, Higgnson listed on a sheet of paper which be preserved and later printed in part in Cheerful Yesterdays. This is what involved-«- 1. Traverse mountainms country miles at 10 miles a niglt, carrying arms ammunition & blankets 8: provisions for a week-ewith certain necessity of turning round and retreating the instant of discovery, 8: of such discovery causing death to our friends: and this in a country daily traversed by hunters. Also the certainty of retreat or detection in case of a tracking snow wh. may come time. Being out 5 nights at mildest, possibly 10.2%!»- clud'g crossing Potomac, a rapid stream where there may be no ford or boats. 2. Charge on a build'g defended by 2 sentinels out- side & 25 men inside a wall 124 ft. high. Several men inside prison besides, 8c 3 determined jailer. Certainty of rousing town and impossiblity of having more than 15 1116313. Retreat with prisoners lfilwounded probably after dayliQt-«dc No. l. repeated. With these considerations in mind, Montgomery advised the abandonment of the project. With great reluctance on the part of all who had come to help, Stevens and Hazlett were left to their fate . Higginson wrote later, "I was not at the time quite satisfied with this opinion, but it was impossible to overrule our leader; and on visiting that region lhoCheerful Yestergys, pp. 233-2314- mfiiggmson Collection. Reprinted in full by Villard o . 333., PP. 576-577. Also in Cheerful Yesterdays, p. 232. and the Jail itself, mam years later, I was forced to believe him 'vholly rightd'u‘z ' Within the next two years, anti-slavery agitation in New Eig- land produced a rash of mob scenes incited by Northerners whose eco- nomic security was affected by the secession of the southern states. Wendell Phillips, the then acknowledged leader of the abolitionists, who gave Sunday lectures at the Boston Music Hall during 1860, was the target of much abuse. The abolitionists found that they had to band together to save Phillips from being bodily attacked and their meetings disbanded. Higginson assumed the task of supervising a group of Germans and Americans to guard the hall while the meetings were in order. He found this an exasperating work, for the undis- ciplined Americans, while on duty, would seat themselves comfortably in the back of the hall to applaud the speaker, while the irascible Gsmans would inevitably be led away by the police for disturbing the peace over political arguments. Just what Higginson's attitude toward Lincoln was in the days that immediately preceded and followed the election is not clear. He omits cement in his autobiography, saying evasively, "It was doubtless well that the march of events proved too strong‘for us, and that the union feeling itself was finally aroused to do a work which the anti-slavery purpose alone could not have accomplished; yet we acted at the time according to our light.“1h3 Because of his close contact with vende11 Phillips during the years 1860 and 1861, however, one may be led to believe that he probably shared Phillips's sentiments. lmCheerful Yesterdays, p. 23h. 1h3Ibid., p. 239. .67 In his. Sunday lectures millips had expressed a decided distrust of lincoln, whose Unionist views were opposed to the growing dislnionv p sentiment of the North fostered by the agitation of the abolitionists and the compromise bills. When the South took matters into its own hands, and one state after another seceded, Phillips at first re- joiced, bidding them good riddance. With a few months, however, he ' retracted his statements, and declared, with Lincoln, that the Southern states had no constitutional right to secede. Higginson, too, after his fiery Disunion speeches of the 1850' s, changed rapidly to a belief in the preservation of the‘Unionuwith the abolition of slavery. When the attack on Fort almter awakened the North to the pre- carious position of the Capitol at Washington, Higginson impetuously went to several leading men in Worcester who gave him a letter of recommendation to Governor Andrew to ask for an appropriation of money in order to send Captain Montgomery and his men from Kansas in- to the mountains of Virginia (a plan similar to John Brown's), and, Higginson with them, to "kindle a back fire of alarm and draw any rebel force away from Washington.“1m‘ Governor Andrew approved of the project but had no money. Samuel Gridley Howe and S. G. Ward took Higginson to State Street where they raised two thousand dol- lars in pledges. Higginson then went in person to Harrisburg, Penn. sylvania, to see Governor mrtin. A letter from Governor Andrew to Governor Wrtin says of Higginson: He is a man capable of facing great perils, of gallant and ardent Spirit, and one whose plans I would 1Mtibia, p. 2h6. 68 not endorse in blank or in advance. You may find on enquiry t t he proposes some scheme not only courageous, but .1830 4 Governor Curtin considered the plan, but thought that Higginson's scheme would precipitate border warfare and that if Higginson should enter western Virginia with troops “it would not only destroy the loyal sentiment of that part of the‘ State, but would influence the people of Kentucky, Tennessee, and Missourci.."1h6 The project was therefore abandoned. . ' Higginson's valor, however, obtained for him a certain amount of prestige at’Worcester, and upon his return, he was offered a posi- tion as major of the Fourth Battalion of Infantry. He refused the offer, he says, for three reasons: ’ ‘ First, that I doubted nw competency; secondly, that my wife, always an invalid, was just at thattlme especially dependent upon me; and lastly, that it was then wholly un- certain whether the government would take the anti-slavery attitude, without which a military commission would have been for me intolerable.lh7 Higginson's sense of duty to his country, however, grow stronger toward the end- of 1861. He reflected: ”It seems to me of the greatest importance that men of Anti-Slavery principle take their mu share in this war, . . . A great many Anti-maven men, all over the state, are holding aloof, and can only be brought in by leaders, in whom they have confidence."lh8 It was a great temptation to organize a troop of enlisted men from among his associates at the athletic 15% Wentworth Higw‘ on, p. 201;. 1%, p. 205. M7Gheeri‘ul Yesterdays, p. 2M. mam Wentworth Higggson, p. 209. 69 anddrill clubs who were telling him, for some time, that they would enlist under him and nehecs else.1’19 In the autunm of 1861, Higginson resigned his pastorate at the Free Gmrch to have more time for a literary career. He felt that he had now ”come back to the one thing which I always thorougly en- Joyed, a quiet life with literature and nature. It has cost me all these years to dire; to do this.“150 filese dreams of peace, however, were not to last. Within a few weeks, “when the anti-slavery position of the government became c1earer,"151 Higginson entered upon his army career, which became a wellspring of source material for the literary career he longed to begin. Recollections of anti-slavery days also provided much ma- terial for later essays and biographies. Higginson comemorated the lives of a few of the abolitionists in short biographical essays, (which will be considered below) saying that they were the men whose love of freedom made Lincoln at last turn the “316.151 W 1h9Ibid. 15°Ibid., p. 210. 15lcheerfhll Yesterdays, p. 239. 70 B. magi-armies and Essays For several years after the Civil War, as one by one the most fame of the abolitionists died, Higginson wrote their memorials, and in doing so, set these leaders- against the America of the se- cond half of the nineteenth century with its turbulent agitations and often violent unre st. Among these men were William Lloyd Gar- rison, John Greenleaf Whittier, Wendell Phillips , Charles Samar, meodore Parker, and Samel Gridley Howe, whose lives were shaped iiy their times and whose time, in m, were shaped by their acti- vities. Higginson was a contemporary of these men, and in some cases intimately shared their anti-slavery experiences and aboli- tion views. Althoufi all of them did not see eye to eye on the means to achieve the end, they all shared l'the root of the matter," as Garrison expressed it, and fought for immediate emancipation. The biographies, on the whole, are candid and generous. Eig- ginson maintains a dust balance by discussing the obvious faults of his subjects together with their merits, and leaves the reader with pictures of men who were essentially human. In so doing, he achieved that with which he credited Wendell Phillips: ”He moreover showed real literary power and an exquisite felicity in the delineation of character, through his memorial tributes to some of his friends."1 Higginson had always personally admired William Lloyd Garrison. In 18146 he had written a youthful poem to him. In 1857 he wrote —.— l'Wendell PhiJlips,"‘ Contemoraries, p. 265. of him in a letter: “or all the heroes of ancient or modern days that man stands more firmly on‘his feet. If he knew that at his next word of truth, the whole solar system would be annihflated, his voice, in saying it, would not tremble."2 And again within the same year he said, flGardner: is the only solid moral roality I have ever seen incar- nate,"the only man 3'29. would do to tie to, as they say out West."3 Garrison's influence on the younger abolitionists (such as hig- glnson) was strong. Higginson points this out when he wrote , A - 'me Garrisonians were generally non-resistants, but thoseswho believed in the physical rescue of fugitive slaves were nevertheless their pupils. The Garrisonians eschewed voting, yet many who voted drew. strength freon them. The Garrisonians took little part in raising troops for war, but the traflition of their influence did much to impel the arnw. ‘l'nis mutual inspiration had not always existed, however, as Higginson points out in his discussion of the historic quarrel which split the abolitionists in 18140 into "Old Organization" and "Now Or- ganization.“ The principal issue wasfiover Garrison's persistent sup- port of a network of reforms in £h_e_ Liberator which scattered his energies to such an extent that slavery, which had been the main work of the abolitionists, now seemed to rank with any and every reform. The quarrel ended in the creation of two rival camps, "with almost all the anti-slavery clergy and voting abolitionists on one side, while Garrison and his Spartan band» held the other."5 Gerri:- 2l‘ncunas Wentworth Page! son, p. 202. 3Letters 393 Journals o_i‘ mamas Wentworth 315g son, p. 93. hWiJliam Lloyd Garrison,‘ Comte oraries, pp. 2h6-2h7. - 5mm” p. 2h8. 72 son was bitter toward his opposition, and caustic toward the Liberty Party which came of it. In later years, Higginsen says, he senses, and was even cooperative with the bee Sailors, saying that they “were. going in the same. direction.” Within his own ranks, Higginson asserts, Garrison was accused or being arrogant and domineering. Those outside his band criticised him for his excessive harshness of language, and his uncompromising rejection of slavery and slaveholders. Higginson agreed that this point of view in Garrison was narrow, and Garrison's statement that slaveholders were “without excuse" showed no understanding of the social and economic mesh that bound Southerners to the slavery system. Nevertheless, in spite of his faults, Higginson maintained that Garrison "kept far higher laws than he broke. He did the work of a man of iron in an iron age, so that even those who recognized his faults migit well join, as they did, in the chorus of affectionate congratulation that marked his closing days."6 This iron strength of character, Higgihson says, was visible in ‘ (hrrison's face. No other "could be compared to it in respect to moral strength—and force; he seemed the visible embodiment of something deeper and more controlling than mere intellect."7 Describing Garrison’s speeches, Higginson says: ‘ His reason marched like an armr without banners, his invective was scathing, but as it were—mt always mainly scriptiral, it did not carry an impression of personal anger, but gimply seemed like a new discovered chapter of Ezekiel. %id.’ p. 256. 7mm. p. 225. 81bid., p. 22.6. 73 I: Inn-inch had the Jwrnalist's love for newspaper clippings, which he used unflinching]: upon his audience to entrench his arguments. higglnson, rocflling some of those lectures says, "For one, I cannot honestly say that I ever positively enjoyed one of—his speeches, or that I ever failed to listen with a sense of deference and of moral leadership."9 this short biography of Garrison is objective and to a large extent, impersonal. It places Garrison's personality in the per- spective of his times and shows a strong man whose influence was comanding if not always appreciated. As a younger abolitionist, Higgnson saw Garrison when his reputation was well established and recognized him as his leader, althougi he differed from his views From the point of view of such a contemporary, in many respects. the biography is valuable as source material (admittedly sketchy) for later historians. And it is interesting to note that Higginson's estimate of Garrison is not materially different from those of more recent biographers.10 Higginson linked together the names of John Greenleaf Whittier and Hillier Lloyd Garrison in his biog'aphy or Whittier for the Eng- lish Men of Letters Seriesn and in two short articles for the 9;b__id. lORalph Korngold, Two Friends of Man: The Story of William Ll d Garrison and Kendall-33313: s —afiTTheirRe .Lon r maid—(Fasten, I9 5538 .Nye, mtg—a“; 110 d Mame Humanitarian Refer-mere (Boston, 1955). “homes Wentworth HiggLnson, John Greenleaf Whittier (New 1011911902). r—1 ”at ' ' ' 7h M which appeared in 1905 and 1907.12 he articles were Amity a rehash at the larger biography which appeared in 1902. or the thirteen chapters which cornprise the book, Higginson allotted five chapters to mittier' s political reforn career and two to his literary career. he proportion is perhaps Justified by a statement which Whittier had printed in the New York my}. regarding the positien which poetry and practicfl reform held in his life . i The simple fact is, that I cannot be sufficiently thankful to the Divine \Pro‘vidence that so early called . my attention to the great intere sts of humanity, saving me from the poor ambitions and miserable iealousies of a selfish pursuit of literary reputation. 3 This is the viewpoint that Higginson assumes, which is not surprising, for Whittier had also been an influence on Higginson in his early days at Newburyport when Higginson was the young pastor of the Free Church there. In his autobiography, Higginson says, "Nothing did more to strengthen m anti-slavery zeal, about 18h8, than the frequent intercourse with Whittier and his house- hold, made possible by their nearne ss to Newburyport."1h "’ It was also through Whittier' s influence the same year that Higginson was nominated for Congress by the new Free Soil Party, ' 12" (hrrison and Whittier ," Inde ndent (December, 1905) and I'John Greenleaf Whittier, " Indepen en camber, 1907) . Two other articles which appeared during these years were "Whittier as Comba- tant in the Days of the Abolitionists , " Book News Month]. , XXVI (December, 1907), and "The Place of Whittier Bong Poets,“ The Reader's Ma zine (February, 1905). A smeary of these is Efien son s teyoraries under the title , "J ohn Greenleai‘ Whittier.u . . 13John Qreenleaf Whittier, p. 82. 11‘Cheeri‘ul Iesterfls, p. 132. h l ' ‘ 7S and mm the district' though in a hopeless minoritséfl whittisr '3 had wanted Higginson partly to stave on his own nomination by the Free Soil Paris“. Higginson, as he expected, lost the election. In the book-length biography, Higginson discusses Garrison‘s discovery of Hhittier when the titentyoone-year-old Garrison had en- berked on a weekly newspaper, __‘rh_e_ :53. m at Newburyport. . Whit- tierfs sister. had- sent sane of his youthful verses to Garrison, who, -1lpreeeed..by then, went to visit the shy and reticent author. It was Garrison who encouragedflhittier's gift tor writing and urged Whit- tier'e isthorto give him. better educational advantages. It was, Garrison also who. assisted whittisr to obtain the position or editor . otthe Bostonhnericsn Hanutacturer. later, flhittier edited the -.nsrorhili (m, the gel gland m, and the Pennsylvania Freeman. In the early days of their friendship, Whittier's admiration 1o:- Garzieon use very strong. At one of the first anti-slavery con- ventions he recorded the. high-water mark of his feeling in a poem, "To, U. I. G." Higginsonsleo had burst into a poetic effusion in "‘ l8h6 in whathelster. called-"e crude verse" to William Ileyd Gar- risen.16 This. admire tion was prompted not only by Garrison's per- eonality, but also toe certain degreeby the courageous manner with which he. had faced the. persecution of a mob in 1835. He was taken to jaili’or. satety where Whittier visited him. Although 15mm. , p. 128 16"Sonnet to William Lloyd Garrison,” W Bell (181:6). 76 mttier himself escaped the violence or the mob scenes which took place frequently during the 1830' s, Higanson says that his courage was tested on several occasions. ‘ In- 1838 Whittier was editing the Minnie. fleemen in Philadelphia. He had written a long poem against slavery and requested that it be read at the anti-slavery meeting to he held in the hall where his printing office was loca- ted. ihe poem, among other things, aroused the wrath of the crowd to mach an extent that the meeting ended in the complete denolition of the building, including newspaper office, anti-slavery bookstore, and hell. . During this period, Higginson maintains, there were striking parallels between Garrison and Hhittier. Both had fine personal ap- pearance; both were lumbly borngu both began literary life as editors; both supported ”Henry Clay and the American System" and both were finally detached from Clay because they could not support a slave- holder for office.17 After the period of violence, however, Whittier and Garrison differed in opinion over Disunion and political parties . Garrison clung to his disunion and non-re sistent views. Whittier joined the newly-tomed Liberty Party, and later the Free-Boilers which grew out of it. he Liberty Party did not favor disunion and on this point was antipathetic to Garrison. Whittier, however, retained his non-resistant attitude, more as a Quaker, Higginson asserts, than as a Chrrisenian. Whittier, Samuel E. Sewa‘Ll, and other leaders of the Liberty Party, however, had no gift of platform eloquence, but were . good organizers and conciliators. They were also often embarrassed 17"Gerrison and Whittier," p. 1312. 77 by entanglements with politicims such as Clay and Van Buren, who did not, strictly Speaking, belong to their group. (hrrison, oh the other hand, possessed a strength, Higginson says, which was expressed in his fearless and clear-cut marine (*1 will not equivocate; I will not apologise; I will not retreat {single inch, and I will-be heardw) Hhittier's lay in his tact and skill of management. " Higginson points out that Hhittier's desires in youth were almost emmmmmmMmmmumfimtmmwmnmmm of representative to Cong-ass when he was twenty-four by means which, Higginson.says, ”were based on the very methods from which we have been trying of late years to get free-«the appeal to mutual self-in- terest in securing posts of honor. "18 This stigma, however, his later impeccable life completely eradicated. He was also intensely interested ' in the downfall of the old Whig Party in. Massachusetts and in the Coalition of the Free Soil and Democratic parties which put Charles Gamer in the United States Senate. Higgnson himself had taken some part in this and spoke at Free Soil meetings which Whittier attended. Higginson says that Whittier once sent him an encouraging note to *go on and prosper."19 In 1851; Whittier was invited by Ralph waldo thereon and others to attend a meeting of the friends of ireedom in Boston, to form a new party organization which later became the Re- publican party. Whittier's politics, all this time, Higginson asserts, leaned toward the party which was in sympathy with abolition. This is seen in his reply to Emerson which Higginson quoted. 18John Greenleaf Whittier, p. 113. 19133541., p. uh. 78 I care nothing for names; I have no prejudices against Whig or Democrat; show me a party cutting it- self loose from slavery, repudiating its treacherous professed allies of the South, and making the p52- Mfi # Egbwmglogged, and I am ready go , s . . . ilthougl abolition was foremost among Whittier-3 s reform acti- vities, he was also interested in other movements. “The elevation of. the laboring classes was a matter dear to hisheart, because he wast all the poets of this period, Higgnson says, closest to the laborer. He was also interested in the temperance and peace movements, and became an early advocate of woman suffrage. After considering Whittier' s reform activities, personal (malities and religious views, Iligginson discusses Whittier as a poet. He emphasizes his place as the poet of famfliar home life. "More than amr other he reaches the actual existence of the people, up to the time of his death."21 Longfellow, Holmes, and Lowell, compared with Whittier, seem-the poets of a class; Whittier alone is near the people. Higgimson compares his verse to that of Whit- tier‘ s literary master, Robert Burns, of whom Whittier had written, “He lives, next to Shakespeare, in the heart of humanity.”22 M Higginson reverts again to Whittier' s anti-slavery work by pointing out that he was the leading bard of the anti-slavery move- ment, and, in this type of poetry, he was always simple and free from excessive or elaborate metaphors. He did not equal Lowell, Higginson believed, in the ability to condense a vigorous thought 201mm, p. M. 21mm, p. 151. 221b1d0’ p. 1609 79 into. general maxims, and his other faults were obvious: his poems were too long and too laden'with superfluous morals. But Whittier gained, Higginson believed, in many ways from the strong tonic of reform agi- tation. "this gave a training in directness, simplicity, genuine- ness;.it taught him to shorten his sword and to produce strong effects by common means. It made him permanently high—minded also, and placed him, as he himself always said aboye the perils and temptations of a merely literary career. 3 Higginson's emphasis in this biography, as has been said, is on Whittier-'5 anti-slavery career. Perhaps the close affinity of interests, and Higginson's personal acquaintance with Whittier accounts for this. Though not profound or deeply perceptive, the biography gives a picture of Whittier the man as Higginson, his contemporary, saw him. It also throws some light on Whittier the post by illustrating his affection for the common man and for the oppressed. Higginson as a reformer and a man of letters could appreciate this combination, and its influence on his own life is comemorated in the following short poem. To John Greenleaf Whittier At dawn of manhood came a voice to me mat said to startled conscience, "Sleep no more!" Like some loud cry that peals from door to door ,. It roused a generation; and I see, Nowlooking back through years of memory, That all of school or college, all the lore 0f worldly maxims, all the statesman's store, Were naught beside that voice’s mastery. Ifanygoodtome orfromme came Through life, and if no influence less divine Has quite usurped the place of duty's flame; If aught rose worthy in this heart of mine, Aught that, viewed backward, wears'no shade of shame,-- Bless thee, old friend! for that high call was tlélline. , - Cambridge, Dec. 17, 1887 ‘M 23Ibid., p. 160 {abdutdoor Studies, The Works of Thomas Wentworth Higginson, VI (Boston, 305773—359. 80 In contrast to Garrison's and Whittier's humble origins, Wendell Phillips, Garrison's eta-partner in the anti;s1avery crusade was a man of aristocratic birth and education. In a short biographical sketch Higginsen pays him a tribute which is sincere and cordial. Higginson praises the singular personal. qualities of the mam-his wealthy Bos- tonian and Brshnin backgmund, his attractive personal appearance, and his heroic renunciation of a promising legal or political career for a reformer's life. Higgnson dwells at length upon Phillips's gifted eloquence ,Rhis conversational rather than "spread-eagle“ style. Phil- lips had the ability, Higginson says, to turn the most hostile audience to his way of thinking, and began his anti-slavery career in 1837 by doing Just that. Smrtly after the death of Elija P. Lovejoy, who was mrdered by a pro-slavery mob while defending his printing press, Phillips delivered a classic extemporaneous oration in protest. "From this time,“ Higginscn maintains, "and while slavery remained, he see first and chiefly an abolitionist} all other reforms were subordinate to this, and this was his life."25 Phillips was encouraged by his in- valid wife, Ann T. Greene, who was also responsible for converting him "‘ to abolition. Sic regarded his lyceum lecture tours as important mis- sions, “for even if he only spoke on 'The Lost Arts“ or 'Street Life in Europe,' it gave him a personal hold upon each community he visited, and the neit time, perhaps, an anti-slavery lecture would he demanded, or one on temperance or woman's rights."26 In this respect, Phillips did more than any other lecturer, David Mead asserts, to change the 25"Wendell millips," Contemporaries, p. 260. 26mm, p. 261. 81 lyceun'fron a place of cultural instructim to a place for agitation.” Wendell Phillips, Higgins»: maintains, was, like {nicodore Parker, 3 connecting link between the non-resistant Garrisonians and the younger-school of abolitionists who believed in physical. opposition to the slave power. Althougl he was not a member of associations for the rescue of fugitive slaves, "he was ready with sympathy and money.“28 And, as has already been seen, he would have been first in the rescue- or Anthony Barns had he understood the arrangements. "It is doubtful whether he was, in his very fibre, a man of action," Higginson believed, "but he never discouraged those who were such, nor had he the slightest objection to violating law where human freedom was at steke."29 In this respect he was unlike Garrison. Phillips, however, thorougmy accepted Garrison's non-voting view, and was ready to speak at any time in opposition to abolitionists who were trying to prove the United States Constimtion an anti-slavery document. Like Garrison he was also a Dimnionist and among the leaders who signed the Call issued for a “State Disunion Convention, " in January and July of 1857. when the South began to secede from the Union, the abolitionists were accused of fostering an evil which was destroying mob of the trade of the North. Mob scenes led by merchants and business men again ocazrred, and, in 1860, Phillips had to have a heavy personal bodyguard to protect him at home and at abolition meetings. Higginson 271411115961310 ence in the }_ii____ddle W__e___st: The Ohio Rooms, 1850- 1evo