. VH2 81. _. ll! “111112111111 1111 ll Ill “ll“ This is to certify that the thesis entitled " Policy Implications of Rural- Urban Migrat1on 1n Calabar, N1ger1a: Relat1ve Effects on Housing" presented by Maurice O. Ebong has been accepted towards fulfillment of the requirements for Ph -D- degree in Mam /2 42/) [1&1 DateA/A/g fl g/ A )7f/J/ ajorpmsso, 0-7 639 POLICY IMPLICATIONS OF RURAL-URBAN MIGRATION IN CALABAR, NIGERIA: THE RELATIVE EFFECTS ON HOUSING By Maurice Okon Ebong A DISSERTATION Submitted to Michigan State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Department of Geography 1978 ABSTRACT POLICY IMPLICATIONS OF RURAL-URBAN ~MIGRATION IN CALABAR, NIGERIA: THE RELATIVE EFFECTS ON HOUSING By Maurice Okon Ebong This study concerns the migration of people in Calabar Division from rural areas to Calabar City, and the impact of the migration process on housing. The historical significance of migration in this Division has been well recognized. Migration in the area dates back to the pre-colonial era. The major differences today, especially after the Civil War which marked the constitution of Calabar as the State Capital, are that the volume of the people involved, the diversity of motives behind the movement, and the magnitude of problems generated by migra- tion have greatly increased. To facilitate understanding of the phenomenon of migration and its effects on housing, this study involved the collection of data on the demography, economy, housing conditions, the social and environmental contexts of a sampled population of the city and its rural hinterland, using formal interview schedules. The analysis reveals that of the numerous and complex combination of causal factors, economic factors represent the major lure to Calabar. Lack of employment opportunities was the most frequently mentioned (by 73.0 percent of the respondents) of the four major reasons why people are migrating from rural Calabar to_ Maurice Okon Ebong the city. The spatial disparities in the distribution of amenities and economic growth, therefore, represent the single most potent force in the selective drift of largely the ambitious, the educated, and young people to Calabar City. Rural-urban migration and its impact on housing was found to con- stitute a threat on the human, social and economic well-being of the Calabar environment. Because of the unabated influx of rural people to the city, the housing shortage has become more an urban than a rural problem. Although the physical structure of housing in the city was found to be closely and positively correlated with the degree of migrant's satisfaction in their urban housing, housing density showed no well-defined pattern or direction of correlation.‘ The level of migrant's education was found to be positively related to housing qual- ity; that is, the educated householders are most likely to live in the permanent, well-furnished dwellings, rather than in the thatch and poorly-furnished ones. The extended family plays a role in the resi- dential absorption of migrants. Thus, even as late comers in a tight housing market, recent migrants still have an equal chance as permanent residents to high quality housing. A wide range of migration and housing policy options already tried in other countries exists. But since it is unbalanced development which largely results in rural-urban migration, the conclusion was that only policies which are perceived within a systems framework, and are directed to both the rural and urban sub-systems, have the greatest potential for controlling migration and providing decent housing for the bulk of the population. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT It is true that no human being is a world to himself in motiva- tion, knowledge, assurance, financial resources, skills, faith, or whatever. without the patience, guidance, advice, criticisms, encour- agement, and shared ideas of many persons this dissertation would not have been completed. Particularly, I wish to thank the African American Scholars Council Inc. for offering me the financial support without which it would have been impossible to undertake this research in Nigeria. I am particularly thankful to Dr. Bill Burr, the Secretary of the Council for his valuable suggestions, and excellent administration of the finances. For the many hours of dedicated, intellectual advice and counsel since my arrival at Michigan State University, sincere and warm appreci- ation is extended to my academic advisor, Professor John M. Hunter. For their time and professional expertise in helping me during the whole period of my academic program at Michigan State University, thanks are also due to the following members of my Guidance Committee: Professor Allan J. Beegle, Professor R. Thomas, Dr. Joe T. Darden and Dr. John R. Mullin. Their helpful suggestions, comments, criticisms and encouragements have contributed immensely to improve and make this dissertation a reality. ii My gratitude is due to Mr. M. U. Essen of the Cross River State Newspaper Corporation for his material and moral support throughout the research period in Calabar. I wish also to express my gratitude to the officials of the C.R.S. Housing Corporation and the Calabar Municipal Town Planning Division, and to all the people interviewed in Calabar Division, for their cooperation. Finally, I wish to dedicate this work to my wife, Margaret, for her patience, understanding, encouragement, and hard work in typing the manuscript while at the same time taking care of her domestic chores; and to my parents for providing the initial motivation, and support to enhance my academic development. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER Page I. INTRODUCTION ............................................. 1 Statement of the Problem .............................. 3 Study Area: Calabar Division ......................... 5 Organization of the Study ............................. 9 II. REVIEW OF LITERATURE ..................................... ll Introduction .......................................... ll Definition of Migration ............................... 12 Historical Movements of People in Africa .............. l4 Typologies of Migration ............................... 17 Theoretical and Methodological Studies ................ 25 Recent Rural-Urban Migration Studies .................. 32 Migration Studies in Calabar .......................... 35 Housing-Related Studies ............................... 37 Research Design and Method of Analysis ................ 45 Rationale for Using Survey Methodology ............. 45 Data Limitations ...................................... 46 Field Research Strategies ............................. 48 Reconnaissance Survey and Research Assistants ...... 48 Sample Design ...................................... 49 Rural Survey ....................................... 50 Urban Data Collection .............................. 5l Special Interviews ................................. 52 Methods of Analysis ................................... 52 III. THE MIGRATION PROCESS IN CALABAR ......................... 54 Historical Background ................................. 54 The Importance of Calabar .......................... 54 People and Migration History ....................... 57 Determinants of Migration ............................. 61 Rural-Urban Push and Pull .......................... 6l Rural-Urban Imbalance .............................. 7l Socio-economic Characteristics of Migrants ............ 76 Age and Sex ........................................ 76 Marital Status ..................................... 78 Education .......................................... 78 Occupation. ........................................ 81 Ethnic Distribution ................................ 82 Migration Flows to Calabar ............................ 83 Rural-Urban Linkages .................................. 93 Summary ............................................... 97 iv CHAPTER Page IV. THE IMPACT OF MIGRATION ON HOUSING ....................... 99 Introduction .......................................... 99 Migration and Impact on Housing ....................... 100 A Scheme of the Impact of Rural-Urban Migration on Urban Housing ................................... 100 Need and Demand for Housing ........................... 104 Urban and Rural Housing Shortages .................. 105 Demographic Consideration .......................... 111 Economic Consideration ............................. 113 Residential Analysis of Migrants ...................... 115 Spatial Distribution of Quality Housing ............... 119 Ethnic Considerations .............................. 135 The Role of Extended Family in Migrant Housing ........ 139 Government Response to Housing ........................ 141 Federal Government ................................. 141 1. Historical Role .............................. 141 2. Present Role ................................. 142 3. Shortcomings ................................. 144 State Government ................................... 145 1. Historical Role .............................. 145 2. Present Role ................................. 146 3. Shortcomings ................................. 147 Housing Policy Alternatives ........................... 148 Conclusions ........................................... 159 V. POLICY RECOMMENDATIONS ................................... 161 Migration Policies .................................... 161 Migrant Stream Control ............................. 165 Rural-Urban Imbalances ............................. 167 Rural Development .................................. 168 Education .......................................... 177 Housing Policies ...................................... 179 Federal Responsibility ............................. 181 1. Social Housing ............................... 181 State Responsibility ............................... 182 1. Cost of Housing and Rent ..................... 182 2. Environmental Quality ........................ 187 Local Responsibility ............................... 191 1. Blight Prevention ............................ 191 2. Code Enforcement ............................. 194 Systems Approach to Migration and Housing Problems.... 195 VI. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS .................................. 201 BIBLIOGRAPHY .................................................... 212 APPENDIX ........................................................ 227 TABLE 3.1 3.12 LIST OF TABLES Percent distribution of responses to the question: Nhy are people moving from this village to Calabar? ....... Percent distribution of responses to the question: What were your reasons for migrating to Calabar? .......... Percent distribution to the question: What do you dislike about Calabar? .................................... Percent distribution of responses to the question: Where do people worry more about having money to care for themselves and their families? (Rural and urban surveys) Percent distribution of responses to the question: Do migrants in towns generally find town life as satisfactory as they had hoped? ........................... Percent distribution responses to the question: Where are better living conditions? (Urban and rural surveys) .................................................. Percent distribution responses to the question: Is it a good thing for village youths to move to town?.... Percent distribution of age of rural outmigrants (Rural survey) ................................................... Percent distribution of years of education by years of migration (Urban survey) .................................. Percent distribution of responses to the question: How many years of education have you? ..................... Urban and rural occupational distributions ................ Ethnic distribution in Calabar ............................ Cross River State and Calabar divisional population dis- tribution and projections-~1975-1985 ...................... Percent distribution of responses to the question: Who most influenced your principal reason for migrating to Calabar? .................................................. Percent distribution of responses to the question: With whom did you first stay in this town on arrival (mention relationship)? ................................... vi Page 65 65 67 68 69 7O 7O 77 80 80 82 83 84 87 87 TABLE 3.16 Percent distribution responses to the question: #hh-D-P- .19 .20 .21 .8 .9 .10 .11 .12 How did you find your first job? .......................... .17 Percent distribution of sources of information about job.. .18 Percent distribution of responses to the question: How many years since you first moved to Calabar? .......... Percent distribution responses to the question: Hill you ever permanently return to your village? If yes, why? ...................................................... Percent distribution of responses to the questions: How often do you visit your village home? (Urban survey) How often do members of your household who live in town visit home? (Rural survey) ................................ Percent distribution of responses to the question: How much money do you send to your family in the village annually? ................................................. Room density and housing units required ................... Rural room density and housing requirement ................ Projected population and households for Calabar Division and the City--1975-85 ..................................... Percent distribution of roofing material for housing ...... Percent distribution of wall types for housing ............ Percent distribution of roofing material by post-civil war and pre—war migration periods ............................. What is the roofing material made of? Controlling for five time periods ......................................... R-mode varimax rotated factor loadings .................... Eigenvalue summary ........................................ The important variables and communality ................... Summary of multiple R and R square ........................ Summary multiple R and R square ........................... vii Page 88 90 92 93 95 97 109 111 112 117 117 118 118 122 123 124 131 132 TABLE Page 4.13 Percent expressing degree of satisfaction with housing by ethnic group .............................................. 137 4.14 Percent expressing satisfaction with housing by ethnic groups, and by service .................................... 138 4.15 Distribution of responses to the question: How would you describe the willingness of your urban host to accommodate you? ....................................... 141 5.1 Percent distribution of responses to the question: What should the government do to improve the quality of housing? .................................................. 180 viii LIST OF FIGURES FIGURE Page 2-1 Typology of population mobility in Africa: examples ....... 22 2-2 A typology of African mobility ............................. 24 3-1 Palm oil exports from old Calabar 1812-1887 ................ 56 3-2 The original inhabitants of Calabar ........................ 58 3-3 Major destination areas of migrants in Nigeria ............. 62 4-1 Schema of impact of migration on housing ................... 101 4-2 Calabar residential distribution ........................... 116 4-3 Calabar R-mode factors ..................................... 125 4-4 Degree of satisfaction and housing quality ................. 128 4-5 Calabar regression residuals ............................... 133 4-6 Calabar distribution of ethnic groups ...................... 136 4-7 The national budget ........................................ 143 5-1 The role of investment in housing in curtailing migration and promoting economic development ......................... 198 ix CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION In both colonial and recent times migration has played an impor- tant role in the development process and social change. It is generally theorized that by ensuring the mobility of labor and its associated human capital between regions and occupations, migration accelerates economic growth. Initially migration in Africa was largely a response to the pressures of colonial taxation. The need to earn money to pay the taxes introduced by colonial governments served as the major driving force behind movements of people to centers with "money economies“. Such labor movements can be considered a form of spatial interaction in which regions of varying levels of social and economic development are connected by streams of persons moving from one locality to another in search of real or perceived opportunities. This pattern of labor flow from the less developed areas to eco- nomic growth points is a common characteristic of rural-urban migration. More recently, rural-urban migration with its increasing complex motiva- tions and concomitant social and economic problems, has become the most visible and dramatic phenomenon affecting African cities. Nigerian cities are now growing only slowly through natural increase, the excess of births over deaths; most of their great population increase comes from rural-urban migration. Although accurate statistical data on the overall rate are not available, it is estimated that more than half of the growth rate of most Nigerian cities may be attributed to imnigra- tion from the less developed rural areas (Byerlee: 1974, and Abasiekong: 1977). Calabar is no exception. The rapid rate of urban growth results largely from the influx of people from underdeveloped rural areas. According to Mabogunje (1970), Calabar grew at an annual rate of 4.5 percent in 1953, and now, 24 years later, due primarily to the change in status of the city from a Provincial to a State Capital as well as the concentration of government and private development programs, the rate has increased to over 5.0 percent. Compared with the world average rate of 2.9 percent for urban areas, Calabar represents one of the faster growing cities of the world. Clearly the change in status of Calabar is a major source of its unchallenged attraction to rural migrants. As the state capital, Calabar is undergoing a remarkable transformation. Major infrastructural investments have been proposed, roads are being reconstructed and widened, modern and imposing office buildings have been erected, indus- trial, educational, commercial and administrative activities with their attendant job opportunities have increased. These and other factors help to raise the attractiveness to potential migrants of Calabar over other possible receiving centers in the Cross River State. Evidently modern Calabar has inherited what Berry (1973: 78) describes as an intentionally centralized administration in which government involvement is more likely in the urban than in the rural area. Obviously, the rate of rural exodus generated by the attractive force of Calabar is too great for both economic and social realities of the city. In this context, migration can be seen not only as a drain from the rural areas, but also as a waste of potential talents in a city deficient in job opportunities. Hence, although migration has been recognized as a distinguishing feature of the development process, the planners and policy makers in Calabar have come to view it with consider- able anxiety; and an awareness of the importance of migration for economic development and social change will ever continue to precipitate research activity. It appears to be man's fate to live in cities, and the people of Calabar are no exception. But, the important question is what form the cities shall take and under what conditions man shall make his home in them. Because of its political status and consequent attractive force, rapidity of its development, and the paucity of detailed demographic analysis of migratory process in this area, Calabar is an ideal location for the study of such population movement and particularly its impact on housing. Statement of the Problem The thesis of this study is that rural-urban migration has aggra- vated urban housing problems, producing an increasing lack of adequate housing, overcrowding with corollary health problems, deterioration of existing housing stock, and high rental and purchase costs. Calabar exactly fits the description of Laison et a1. (1969) of African cities as "... growing much too fast in the slum sectors." As a basic human need housing represents an important element in the health, welfare and efficient productivity of migrants. Yet, the Cross River State has neither adequate research on the pervasive phenomenon of uncontrolled urban growth, and the relationships between the migration process and the housing delivery system, nor definite government policies to miti- gate the mounting housing problems resulting from the influx of people to the cities. It should be noted that the location, quantities, quali- ties, and functions of housing should have an impact on the welfare, not only of the migrants, but of the community at large. Generally this study seeks to facilitate understanding of the problems of urbanization and its impact on housing as well as rural/ urban development in the Calabar region. The need for a 'new' geography of development which integrates population movements and progressive rural development in Calabar is timely. This study which focuses on the needs to monitor the quality and quantity of housing in this study area should aid in the formulation of national policies about the provision of programs capable of promoting human welfare. Such policies should contribute to planners' efforts of utilizing migration to benefit rather than retard socio-economic development in the area. Since the basic human drive is to improve one's welfare, a strategy of balanced develop- ment should ensure the participation and welfare of all able citizens, irrespective of their spatial location. Specifically, the study seeks to: 1. Identify and analyze the significant spatial, social, economic, psychological, political features and processes associated with rural-urban migration in the Calabar region. 2. Determine the impact of internal migration on urban and rural housing supply. 3. Determine the quantity, quality and spatial distribution of housing among migrants of different ethnic origin and educa- tional level in the study area. 4. Investigate alternative housing policies, and the role of governments, institution, and the extended family system in monitoring the quality and quantity of housing in the area. 5. Recommend policies for the solutions of migration and housing problems. Study Area: Calabar Division This research focuses on Calabar City: the capital of the Cross River State, and its surrounding rural area. It will embrace the boundaries of what formerly was known as Calabar Division, an area of 2,850 square miles (Figure 1-1). According to the 1963 census, the Division as a whole had a population of 267,015, while Berger's (1975: 218) estimate for 1975 puts it at 364,571. The area had an average density of 94 persons per square mile in 1963, or lower than the State average density of 331 persons per square mile (Nigeria, 1968:3). While the greatest population density of the Division can be found on the southeastern section of the Cross River in the vicinity of Calabar, the Northwest and the higher parts of Oban Plateau are almost uninhabited. This low population density, particularly of the rural areas, makes the region suited for this research because the analysis can be focused on T. 95m: 4833 $35.... "8.50m /.. / / .X / 1‘ o... 5- m... a\ .9 .0 .9 - faces: an; Eoan.o»oo lllll X a . . _ a 39.2.. :1: h = = _S— ...... I 0 1 Q ~ _ O > Be: an in o f VK . I hues-392 _°:°-.°¢~0_C_ '0.' I'll / ./\I \A\.\ l l l 1!. z O — m _ > - o f x l) 2 o x o . /. « /.. ,_ 1 m4 , .. . X l p X / / /A TV A J ./-.U /,H/r l/lleafl/V, — >a=.a .\ if \ . \ . . V1 ./ .r.\ ./.ll,lilIl/74/llWAi\Hl/ flfi I}. x v . - x - \ . ,M WWI 74W ., . . t L A \ ax? I eflfl. x ,xilldlmlll/l sx x f. .. 3 4, a . X /1- ., l («Ax/M % .. : . -3 A... w .. . aha/fl”! . \ / F A o 2 < x _ . .4 u. ”Ayn-r! a... .H/ / :r w 4.- .. lllll ll WNi/x l A. . ,\ x m .53- EC F . \ ./ \, ...— n . . 2.5.2. . f V . 3.. \ \ one 5.3 85. V w\...¥ N 9:.er \\ Which—3 \ 1 \ \ \ 3w .2. K. _ x / \l W _ as T \ . 230* $me \ 3 _\_, L. 3...: \ ’1 \\!.5\ 11.5935 \fl//,c:o \ a. \\ .Ewuls \_ _ \ 20 25 .3. .. \\ a»: as; 2.5 .x\ :Io» / /\/..\.. Izo_m_>_o HQ .3. X x 583...: I, a\ \ilu 3.; 39.4 a x “33.9.. \ 2.23. .3. \\ ../ _. X . om:_:\ .3 \ \ zap. .. . e r u , / O l../ _. \\ 2.3313! 51—33: f\ 55.9.. 6136 \0 Z O > C v- O\\ l/ .. . . 4m 2 < x \ .(.| _ . . Q < n. v. S. < v. < . \ at . \. .6 v4 .\. X ,6- .‘u. \ a. \. zo_m_>_o .29: o specific causes of rural-urban migration, such as unbalanced spatial development, ruling out the widely postulated argument of "population pressure" on land and resources as a major force pushing people to the cities. Calabar city itself has the highest population of all the other urban centers in the State. In 1963 its population was 76,418, and Berger's 1975 estimate put the population at 91,266; as compared with 364,571 for the Division and 3,837,592 for the State in 1975. While the State's urban population is estimated to be 12.9 percent, Calabar Division has 25.0 percent of urban population. Furthermore, its 5.4 [percent annual growth rate exceeds that of its rural hinterland (3.0 percent), and that of Cross River State urban areas (3.8 percent). Generally the physiographical setting of Calabar Division can be described as a gradual slow ascent from the Cross River estuary in the Southwest to the Cameroon mountains in the North-East. The mangrove swamps of the estuary region merge into the coastal plain, followed by the rolling plateau of over 800 feet towards the North and North-East. The only steep slopes are found within the crystalline complex of the Oban hills beyond the rolling plateau. Thus, in his description of the topographic background of the area, Karmon (1966:18) concludes that "topographic obstacles to mobility of population and cultivation of land are minimal." Agriculture remains the major occupation and mainstay of the area's economy and Morgan (1959:49-51) pointed to this area of the "Guinean vegetational zone" as being well suited for the production of plantation crops for export. Oil palm is a major cash crop of the area. Food crops such as cassava, yam, maize and plantain are commonly grown, while chickens, goats and sheep play a minor part in the people's economy. According to the 1972 general economic survey of the South- eastern State, about 65 percent of the total employed population were in agriculture, which sector contributed 62.6 percent of the gross domestic product (Southeastern State, 1975:55). But the sizes of the farms are usually under three acres per farming family, due in part to the restric- tive land tenure, low capacity or a lack of suitable tools, techniques and equipment for operating large farms. The drudgery and hazards of agriculture are evidently some of the major repulsive factors in the rural areas. Agriculture thus tends to repell rather than attract people, particularly the young "school leavers".1 The administrative status of Calabar is another important factor in understanding the forces behind rural-urban migration in the Division. The city started as a trading post set up by the Portugese in 1588. Owing to its protected position on a hill it became the capital of the Oil Rivers Province, and the main port on the estuary of the Cross River. By 1830 the area of the "oil rivers", the area between the Niger and the Cross, was the largest single trading area in the whole of Africa. From its inception Calabar, like many colonial cities in Africa, was intended to serve, not just as a seat of administration but as a principal entre- pot facilitating the exploitation of human and economic resources of its 1A school leaver is one who has completed six or more years of education. hinterland. With the choice of Calabar as the capital of the South- Eastern State, in May 1967, it was obvious that Calabar had the poten- tial to become the most attractive spot in the State, demanding the attention of administrators and policy makers, and attracting people and resources from its hinterland, and beyond. Organization of the Study The rest of the study is organized in six inter-related chapters. Chapter II reviews the pertinent literature on the general concepts, and theoretical and methodological foundations of the migration process. The chapter includes a summary of the historical background and typolo- gies of migration in Africa as well as a discussion of some specific and current studies of rural-urban migration in Africa as well as Calabar. The review provides a basis for hypotheses to be tested. Chapter II also discusses research design, data limitations, methods of collection and analysis of the data. Chapter III provides an historical background of migration in Calabar Division, followed by a discussion of the determinants of migra- tion, and an examination of rural-urban linkages. Chapter III also includes the exploration of the migration process in Calabar, with de- tailed information about the socio-economic characteristics of the migrants. In Chapter IV the focus is turned to the impact of migration on housing. Ongoing Federal and State government housing policies are presented, and their relevance to migration problems evaluated. 10 Also explored in this chapter are the various variables associated with housing supply and demand in the study area. After an analysis of the qualities and spatial distribution of housing among migrants and non- migrants, some housing policy alternatives for solving rural and urban housing problems are discussed. Chapter V presents a two-pronged policy recommendation arising from the study. Policy affecting both the migration process and the housing delivery system in the Division is outlined. Finally, in Chapter VI, concluding statements on this study are presented. CHAPTER II REVIEW OF LITERATURE Introduction Though a formidable bibliography can be compiled of African migra- tion studies in general, relatively little work has been done on rural- urban movement per se. Besides, research has so far tended to be largely descriptive rather than analytical, providing knowledge of migrant characteristics but little understanding of why they move. The literature on migration also demonstrates the paucity of detailed analysis of the migratory process in the Cross River State (C.R.S.) of Nigeria, suggesting the need to expand demographic research in all parts of the State. Pool's observation is no less instructive to the C.R.S. than to Africa as a whole: . the study of migration in Africa is piecemeal which creates problems for basic demographic analysis.... Thus among the priorities in African demography should be listed the collection and analysis of data on the volume and nature of migration flows (1969:168). The general literature on migration is quite enormous. As Reul (1974) puts it, migration affects all people regardless of where they live or their economic situation. Therefore, migration has given rise to a relevant body of literature which is both widely dispersed and highly varied in the nature and level of the problems, concepts and methods discussed. To provide the foundation for this study, this 11 12 review will focus on some specific aspects of migration studies. Materials related to the following seven categories will receive atten— tion: (1) Definitions of migration; (2) Historical movements of people in Africa; (3) Typologies of migration in Africa; (4) Theoretical and methodological studies; (5) Studies by social scientists; (6) Recent rural-urban migration studies; and (7) Migration studies in Calabar. Definition of Migration The word migration derives from the Latin migrare, meaning to change one's residence. By current definition however, it means more than that, since a person who moves from one home to another in the same neighborhood and thus retains the same social framework is not deemed a migrant. Therefore, migration is generally defined as "a relatively permanent movement of persons over a significant distance from one geographic place to another" (Peterson, 1968). To distinguish migra- tion from other types of movement the United Nations (1971:l) postu- lates that it is mobility that involves a sustained or permanent sojourn in the place of destination that is envisaged by the concept of migra- tion. The United Nations, considers removal for one year or more as "permanent“ and thus as migration, while a stay for a shorter period is classified as a visit. But because no particular specification of dura- tion of stay suits all purpose, Sills (1968:286) points out that the exact meaning of "permanent" and "significant" remains to be specified. It should, however, be noted that whether or not short-term mobility should be included in the concept of migration depends on the purpose 13 of the statistics. In Africa, for instance, the temporary separation of male industrial or mine workers from village life has been institu- tionalized into the standard pattern of migration (Mitchell, 1961). Elaborating on the definition of migration, Mangalam (1968) indi- cates that "it is often preceded by decision-making on the part of the migrant that results in change in the interactional system of the migrant". In his definition, Schwarzweller brings out more clearly this point of the migration process as a disturbance on the interaction- al system: Migration is a relatively permanent moving away of a collectiv- ity called migrants from one geographical location to another, preceded by decision-making on the part of the migrants on the basis of a hierarchically ordered set of values or valued ends and resulting in changes in the interactional system of the migrants.... It is, of course, both a tension-manager for the system where it originates and a tension producer for the sys- tem where it terminates (ND). Likewise, Mabogunje states that rural-urban migration represents: A basic transformation of the modal structure of a society in which people move from generally smaller, namely agricultural communities to large, mainly nonagricultural communities (1970). The significance of these last definitions is in their emphasis on the impact of the migration process on the society as a whole. Moreover, looking at migration as a social system process interlinking two sub- systems at both the Points of origin and destination can better facili- tate understanding of the migration phenomenon, and otherwise make the formulation of control policies more feasible. Two forms of migration are often recognized--internal, that is, the migration of people within a country; and international, that is, 14 the migration of people among countries. Considered spatially, internal migration, the focus of this study, can be subdivided into rural to rural, urban to rural, urban to urban and rural to urban. Obviously, the list of definitions of migration is inexhaustible. Each researcher seems to add new insight to the definitions. This dif- ficulty in finding a universally accepted definition has contributed to the current lack of generalized theory encompassing migration phenomenon. This is a study in rural to urban migration, and migrants were defined on the basis of both space and time dimensions. A migrant was defined as a person who had moved from his village or former place of residence to settle in Calabar for at least six months. Those who moved from other towns were asked to give reasons why they left their villages. The limitation of the definition to those who have resided in the town for at least six months was meant to eliminate the problem of classify- ing visitors and holiday-makers as migrants. Non-migrants were defined as individuals who have resided in Calabar all their lives. Historical Movements of People in Africa Migration in Africa is not a new phenomenon. What is new, however, is the high rate of rural-urban migration. Hance's (1970) well-known work on the historical movements of people in Africa traces the early history of migration in Africa. He discusses early migration through the precolonial times, such as the Fulani expansion in 15 West Africa, and migration in the colonial period. Giving insight into the nature of those early movements, Caldwell observed: Such movements were not individual movements in the sense that one man could decide upon a very different destination from his fellows, for it was dangerous in most parts of tropical Africa to go beyond the bounds of one's own ethnic group. Hence those who saw beyond their immediate surroundings often moved in groups (1968:201). Clearly movements and interaction among the peoples outside their ethnic areas had been going on as far back as the eighth century A.D. during the rise of the Ghana empire (Mabogunje, 1972:4). It should be noted that pioneer studies of African migration were mainly concerned with sociological questions related to the African adjustment to city life and to the routine of the industrial, economic system. Among such early studies, which were concluded before the end of the Second World War, were those of Hellmann (1937), Wilson (1941), and Gluckman (1945). Gluckman's observation that the African is detribalized the moment he leaves the rural area is an evidence of the orientation of those early studies toward sociological questions. Other early studies include those by Ibbots (1946:73) in Southern Rhodesia, Jones (1953:37-44) in South and Central Africa, and Miner (1953:12) in West Africa. They all emphasized the African adjustment to urban life. Another significant point about early migrations is that they too were economically motivated, becoming moreso in the colonial era. According to Mabogunje (1972:4) movements of people "involved trading activities across the desert and within the Sudan." The Landers wrote in 1832 concerning the town of Kishi in Yorubaland: 16 A great number of emigrants from different countries reside here: there are not a few from Borgoo, Nonffie, Hausa, Bornou, and two or three Tuaricks from borders of the Great Desert (Lander et a1., 18322204). Colonialism brought many significant changes in African migration. The imposition of taxes by colonial government has been widely recog- nized as a major factor which generated new streams of migration. In addition, by providing more sophisticated institutions and technologies, colonialism reactivated the movement of people. For instance, in the colonial period a more permanent situation of peace and order was estab- lished, and transportation by rail, road, sea and air was improved. The peaceful conditions expanded opportunities for innovative activites and migrants came to play a very prominent role in resource development all over West Africa. Under these conditions migration involved more individuals as opposed to the group movements of precolonial times. Thus, by the end of the colonial period, the stage was set for the continuing pattern of modern migrations in Africa. The foregoing review demonstrates that even before the colonial era, migration has been going on in Africa. In some ways, the movements were similar to those of today. Even then migration involved what Schwarzweller describes as a "disturbance of the interactional system", or a basic transformation of the modal structure of a society. Economic incentives also played a part in the directions, and motiva- tions behind early movements of people in Africa. The major difference, however, is that today the volume of people, the complexity of motives, and the magnitude of problems generated by migration, have increased 17 so considerably that the need to study this complex human phenomenon in Africa is greater than ever before. Typologies of Migration The desire to understand the intriguing issues posed by the migra- tion process, and to evolve measures of prediction has long occupied the minds of many social scientists. Classifications of population mobility have been considered as one step in the direction of under- standing the ever complex migration phenomenon. For instance, a well- known scholar interested in typologies of migration, has indicated that the use of typological methods would enhance our ability to evolve measures to counteract migration: . it would increase understanding of the process (of migra- tion) merely to ask whether this is conservative or innovating migration: Do these agriculturalists want better conditions within their present way of life, or do they move to cities for the sake of urban amenities? (Petersen, 1958:290). Based on the assumption that migration can best be analyzed on the bases of cultural, psychological and relevant social factors, Petersen identified five typologies of migration. These comprise primitive, forced, impelled, free, and mass migrations. He said that primitive migration results from such "migratory forces" as ecological push. Forced migration occurs in situations where, because of "migration policy", the migrant has no power to decide to stay or move. But, in impelled migration, the migrant still has the power to decide whether or not to move. In the case of free migration, "higher apira- tions" drive the migrant to move. Mass migration is a class in which individual motivations are no longer relevant. In this type, pioneers 18 blaze the trails, others follow, and emigration becomes a social pattern. Furthermore, he classified migrants as either "innovating" or "conservative". Innovators are those who move in order to achieve some- thing new as in pioneer movements, while "conservative" migrants are those who move in response to a change in their circumstances, thereby hoping to retain their way of life in another locus. Nomadic movements are an example of this latter typology. Gould et a1. (1973:2) have pointed out the limitations of Petersen's classification. They note that spatial aspects are implied in the classification but that they are not explicitly considered. Furthermore, Petersen does not take account of temporal dimensions in his classification. Beltramone (1965) elaborated a typology of geographical mobility which takes into account both spatial and temporal dimensions. The bases of his differentiation was a major distinction between "deplacements definitifs", that is, permanent movements involving departures from one place to another; and “deplacements temporaires", that is, temporary movements where there is a retaining of attachment to a particular place with periodic return to it. In the category of temporary movements he distinguished between those which are regular in time (daily, weekly, seasonal) and also in space, as well as those which are irregular in both time and space. Many other scholars (Fairchild, 1925; Kant, 1943; Isaac, 1947; Gupta, 1959; Herbele, 1955) have attempted to construct typologies of migration. Kant, for example, has reviewed a number of classifications, 19 including one of his own, which are all of a generalized nature. He identified two broad categories of migrations: intra-local, and inter- local migrations. Such generalized categories of migration, it should be noted, are of little assistance in understanding the complexity of human mobility. Fairchild differentiated four typologies of migration; namely, invasion, conquest, colonization, and immigration. The best example of invasion is the Visigoth's sack of Rome. Conquest was defined as a type in which the people of a higher culture uses its technical and organizational superiority to subjugate relatively less advanced peoples. In the colonization type a well-established, progressive and physically vigorous State settles what to them are newly discovered countries. Immigration is characterized by individually motivated move- ments between well-established countries at approximately the same stage of civilization. While Fairchild's classification and explana- tions illustrate international migrations, it is Isaac's fourfold classification: invasion, conquest, colonization, and migration (basic- ally derived from Fairchild's typologies), which provide relevant explanations and examples to illustrate an internal migration pattern. In tropical Africa the desire to increase knowledge of the migra- tion process through a systematic appraisal of mobility phenomena has also generated interest in the formulation of migration typologies in recent years. Contemporary migration flows in Africa have been classi- fied mainly in temporal and spatial dimensions. According to Byerlee: In the temporal dimension, African migrations include (a) seasonal migration, (b) short-term migration for a period of two to five years, and (c) long term or permanent 20 migrations. Spatially, migration may be rural to rural, rural to urban or urban to urban (l972:1). Gould et a1. (1972) have given a detailed description of the typologies of migration in Africa, basing their classifications on the temporal and spatial dimensions. They point out that the fundamental points in the dimension of time are the distinctions between mobility, migration and circulation. Mobility is a sufficiently broad term and includes all movements of those which are repeated several times each day to inter-continental movements over several thousand miles; whereas, movements which do not involve permanent change are usually designated as circulation. The principal difference between migration and circulation lies in the permanence of the former and the non- permanence of the latter. It should be noted, however, that because no broad specification of duration of stay suits all purposes, "the period of time implied by the term permanence cannot be generalized in all instances of migration, but has to be considered individually in each specific case" (Mangalam, 1968:8). But as Gould et a1. go on to explain, if there is a specifica- tion on the part of the individual or group of individuals who are mov- ing to return to their place of origin, and when before leaving in the first place this intension is clear, then the movements may be consid- ered circulation rather than migration. They also emphasized that this distinction between circulation and migration is not directly related to the duration of each movement, for circulatory movement may last longer than migratory ones. The distinction is rather directly related 21 to the long-term changes in distribution of population that result from the movements. For instance, "circulation” changes in the distribution of population in the long-term are not significantly different from those in the short-term; whereas, with "migration", changes in the long- term are quite different from changes in the short-term. The basic framework for typology of population mobility, as pro- vided by Gould et a1. considers space in four categories of rural/urban relationships and time in the span of each movement (Figure 2-1). This typology indicates that all African population movements--such as move- ments associated with cultivation, pastoralism, fishing, laborers, traders, pilgrims and refugees, can be accommodated in one of six major time categories, and within the framework, each movement type can be identified by one of the four spatial components. Taking rural-urban movement as an example, on the time sacle, commuters are identified with daily movements, pilgrims with periodic, laborers with seasonal, labor- ers with long-term, refugees with irregular, and laborers with permanent migrations. Gould et al. describe seasonal mobility as a particular type of periodic movement which is rigidly defined by marked seasonality in phy- sical and/or economic environment. Seasonal movement from rural to urban areas involves mainly laborers. But seasonal migration between rural areas, involving pastoralists, laborers and cultivators has been import- ant in areas of Africa with a pronounced dry season. Beals and Menezes (1970) have analyzed this phenomenon in Ghana, using a inter-regional programming model to demonstrate the role of seasonal migration in .mkm. ...a .o e.=ou ”woezom 22 w _ .ma=m>gom, W W ~w>wu _ m “ meoucch W m .omcmzo Awa_—uv . . .msouassoo . M _m_u:oc_mom mmomswmm W mcocmgh meoumgh mewgm—_a amassingac. . conezucmnga. . mommzwmz . meoum>_u_:u _ mgocaonm. mgogzonm. mgopm>_u.=u . pagagucmnga .yoxgms ow . meogsoam. mgoum>_u.=u mgogsonm. mommammm mgmgzono. mgogzonm. mewgm._a mgmuaasoo canszupmgzm mmomzemm Amuoxsos .mcm—uuom .mgogm>wu~=u pwgzgv noeomcoam m:_u$.;m mgoum>pupao mgocmgh meoeozuww mgmcaonm. memuczz wedges: .meo~_:o_oo maoocmacoam mam__mcoumm¢ madcaonm. mummpmeoumma meoum>wu~=u msoue>wu~39 pmgzsu_mgzz acmcmsgom empzmogg. Egouimco. —m:ommom o_co_so¢ apwmo zo.h533... ......_...< .2 ego—.1»? < 17801-571! 25 migration flows, in the different African countries, but will be sig- nificant for policy implications. Theoretical and Methodological Studies Until now, migration studies in Africa have tended to be largely descriptive rather than analytical, thus failing to "yield an estab- lished theory for analyzing rural-urban migration in Africa" (Byerlee, 1974). However, a large number of migration models and theoretical formulations; such as, the deterministic and probalistic models (summarized by Morrill, l965), and the pull-push theory (Lee, 1966) have been developed outside Africa. Generally, these formulations have been applied to the developed countries of the world. Yet, as Mabogunje (l970) points out, in Africa: "Their relevance for handling movements ' from rural and urban areas has hardly been considered." The "pull and push" theory is often used in explaining the causes of migration. According to the theory, the push results from deteriora- ting conditions in rural areas forcing migrants to seek a better life in towns, and the pull is exerted by the towns, which attract rural migrants because of increasing job opportunities. In his A Theorygof Migration Everett Lee observed that: No matter how short, or how long, how easy or how difficult, every act of migration involves origin, a destination and intervening obstacles, among these is the distance of the move which is always present (l965:48). He went on to classify the factors influencing migration as: (l) pull factors or those associated with the destination area; (2) push factors or those associated with the source area; (3) intervening obstacles, 26 such as, ethnic barriers, distance from other possible receiving centers and cost; and (4) personal factors. But, indicating that we should use the pull and push concept with caution, Essang and Mabawonku have argued that "pull" or "bright light" factors may attract the "curious" but not the "economic man" in Nigeria. Clearly, the source and destination areas are both likely to have a mixture of attractive and repulsive elements; and rarely can a single reason explain the variations in a phenomenon as complex and changing as migration. Thus Mitchell (l961:262) states that "single factor explanations of migrations are totally inadequate and that listings of possible motivations are also not very helpful". Yet classification of factors influencing migration such as the "pull-push" factors can aid in identifying the dominant of the numerous causes of migration in individual cases. Cyprian Ekwensi provides an example of uneconomic motivation, or the so-called "pull effect" on migration in Nigeria. He notes that, to a typical migrant, the city, no matter what conditions, is a symbol of power and high standard of living--a center of civilization better than any level of rural life: Better for her point of view, the squabble of Lagos slum so long as there are sophisticated people around her, the bright lights of a night spot, a 'high life' band-~she would be glad to walk about the city hotels--rather than marry a farmer with a thousand pounds a year for his income, and no spice of life.... (1965:57). An analysis of migration conducted by McCain (l972) reveals "push effect“ as the dominant cause of migration in Nigeria. The study indicated that regions of Nigeria characterized by a small active population with a large inactive population produce higher dependency 27 ratios and serve to push individuals to migrate to other regions where the prospects of employment may be better. Thus, the Northern Region of Nigeria, with a dependency ratio of 20.6 in 1963, was interpreted as a region which pushed out more of its people than the Western Region with an 11.1 dependency ratio. The concept of intervening opportunities mentioned in Lee's theory was first propounded by Samuel Stouffer, who in 1940 introduced the con- cept of intervening opportunities to provide an explanation for the observed spatial mobility of people. He hypothesized that the number of people going a given distance from a point was not a function of distance directly but rather a function of the spatial distribution of intervening opportunities (Stouffer, 1940). In testing the hypothesis, Stouffer encountered problems of measuring "opportunities". To improve on his model, in 1960, he proposed the concept of "intervening opportuni- ties and competing migrants" and suggested that distance scale should not necessarily be measured in terms of miles but rather in terms of "economic distanCe“ (Stouffer, 1960). Ravenstein (1885:1889) was the first to offer "Laws of Migration" most of which still form the foundation for migration studies today. His seven laws of migration can be summarized as follows: (1) most migrants move a short distance, those who move a long distance proceed to large commercial and industrial centers; (2) migrants move by stages, growing cities absorb surrounding population, leaving gaps in villages and small cities to be filled by people from far areas; (3) there are streams and counter streams of migration, in which each main current of 28 migration produces a compensating counter current; (4) there are urban- rural differences in propensity to migrate, as natives of towns are less migratory than those of rural areas; (5) there is a predominance of females among short distance migrants; (6) an increase in the level of technology leads to an increase in the rate of migration; and (7) there is a dominance of economic motives in migration. It has been argued that "not all of these findings are very true today even among industrial societies" (Nabila, 1974:20), and he doubts, for example, if in the African context it can be said with certainty that most migrations are only short distances. But some researchers have proved that several of Ravenstein's hypotheses are still relevant in contemporary migration studies (Redford, 1926; Sjaastad, 1962; Stiglitz, 1969). Sjaastad's findings that "gross migration in one direction is the best single indicator of the amount of backflow" sup- ports Ravenstein's theory of “streams and counter streams" in migration. Stiglitz's analysis revealed that “migration results from mainly per- ceived differences in economic opportunity in the rural and urban sectors and it continues until these differences are eliminated". This and other such findings support Ravenstein's theory of the "dominance of economic motives" in migration. Recently, there has been a growing interest in the formulation of theories and methodologies of migration in Africa. Considering migra- tion from a sociological perspective. Gugler (1969) demonstrated that while economic motives dominate, it is the interaction of economic and non-economic factors which most affect the decision to migrate. 29 He attached key importance to strong rural-urban ties in explaining African rural-urban migration. Nhile sociologists, demographers, geographers and anthropoligists have long dominated migration studies in Africa, economists have only recently pursued systematic research on the subject in an attempt to formulate a theory of migration in developing countries. Their studies focus on the impact of migration on employment problems and the economic motive behind migration. Studies by Lewis (1967); Frank (1968); Eicher et al. (1970); Todaro (1973); Rouke et a1. (1971); and Byerlee (1975) demonstrate the existence of a large gap between urban and rural earn- ings as a common feature of several African countries. The Todaro Theory explicitly treats economic variables to explain rural-urban migration ‘ in the face of urban unemployment. He hypothesizes that rural-urban migration is determined by the rural-urban differential in the present value of expected earnings, computed from the probability that some migrants will be unemployed in the urban area. That is, he took into consideration the fact that not all who move in search of higher urban earnings will find any job at all. The essential elements of the Todaro model of migration have been empirically tested in the United States and other developing countries (Bishop, 1961; Johnson, 1971; Rempel, 1970; Godfrey, 1973;66-78). The empirical evidence from Africa is rather inconclusive. For instance, Rempel's test of the model in Kenya showed no consistent evidence of the importance of a rural-urban expected income differential as an attractive force in urban centers. Johnson refined the model to include 30 the rate of urban job turnover and the rate of creation of new jobs as additional factors affecting the probability of obtaining a job. Other studies have indicated that economic variables may not be the only important ones influencing rural-urban migration. In his review of Todaro's hypothesis,Godfrey drew some interesting conclusions. He noted that by excluding certain important variables Todaro has mis- specified the economic variables. The fact of having been to school may indeed be more important than what is taught there, as far as schools‘ influence on migration is concerned. For a variety of reasons parents want their children to escape from the traditional/rural into the modern/urban environment. Godfrey points out that the means of _escape is the educational system,and that education itself has an effect on migration quite separate from its influence on expected income. According to Byerlee (1974:553) the Todaro's model still needs to address such questions as the determinants of rural incomes, the role of rural education and information, as well as non-economic variables--a11 of which are important in policy analysis. In an attempt to fill this gap in Todaro's model, Byerlee provides "a theoretical schema of the deci- sion to migrate" which takes into consideration noneconomic variables with particular emphasis on the rural environment in which that decision is made. Another contribution along the same line as Todaro is Harris' (1970) “two-sector“ model of rural-urban migration. He recognizes the existence of politically determined minimum urban wages at levels sub~ stantially higher than agricultural earnings as a major factor in the 31 decision to migrate. He notes that migration will continue so long as the expected urban real income exceeds real agricultural product. Hence, Narimer (1970) concludes that "migrants go to cities to find jobs, irrespective of employment situation in urban areas". Perhaps the best known work on the methodology of migration in Africa is the one offered by Akin L. Mabogunje (1970). In his "Systems Approach To a Theory of Rural-Urban Migration" he treats migration as the result of the aggregate of collective forces. Viewing migration as a spatial process with dynamic spatial impact, he states that it "can best be understood within the framework of a general systems theory". He defines a system as an entity consisting of specialized interde- pendent parts, with subsystems. Rural-urban migration is, therefore, concerned not only with why people migrate but all the implications and ramifications of the process. As a very complex phenomenon involving not only the migrants but a number of institutional agencies, there exist highly varied adjustments everywhere in a region, and a complex interaction between the migrant and the system. Thus, he concludes that in studying migration, attention must be focused not only on the migrant but also on the various institutions and the social, economic and other relationships which are an integral part of the process of the migrants' transformation. Likewise Nabila (1974:19) regards the migra- tion process “as a continum with highly interrelated or interconnected parameters". Clearly, an approach which sees migration not as unidirec- tional, but as "a circular interdependent, progressively complex and. self-modifying system in which changes in one part generates changes in 32 another", is needed to formulate meaningful migration policies in Africa. Recent Rural-Urban Migration Studies Migration studies which deal strictly with movements from rural to urban areas are only beginning to gain momentum in modern Africa. Most of the studies focus on the selective nature of rural-urban migra- tion with respect to education and age of migrants, and the resultant burden on the rural as well as the urban centers (Callaway, 1969:58-68; Rempel, 1970; 0minde, 1968; Sabot, 1972; Imoagene, 1975; Abasiekong, 1976). According to Callaway, three quarters of the migrants to Ibadan in Nigeria are school-leavers between 15 and 25 years of age, while Abasiekong‘s study reveals a modular age of 25-34 years and 82.2 per- cent "functional literates" of the migrants in Calabar. In Kenya, Rempel estimates a peak in the 20-25 age group. A survey in Ghana re- vealed that 65 percent of respondents with no education had never migrated and did not intend to migrate, compared to only 17 percent for those respondents with some secondary schooling (Caldwell, 1969:62). Selectivity is considered an important concept in understanding the impact of migration on the economy (Mabogunje, 1968:212). As Browning and Feindt (1969:72) observed, "the degree of selectivity is of obvious relevance in the interpretation of the effect of migration on the community of origin and on the potential success of the migrant at his destination." Because migrants are often young and motivated people, imbalance between rural and urban human resources is often 33 intensified. A massive exodus of the young, abler, brighter, more courageous, venturesome, and creative individuals can drain the rural population of entrepreneurs and innovators needed to pioneer new tech- niques in the rural areas (Byerlee et al., 1975:6; Green et al., 1972: 14). Todaro (1969:138) also associates selective migration with “a possible reduction of agricultural output". In examining the conse- quences of migration on the Urban Revolution in Nigeria, Imoagene also demonstrates how "the huge exodus of the most productive age-groups from the rural hinterland to towns causes further disorganization and poverty which in turn constitutes push factors from rural to urban areas". Other researchers have commented on the extent of aggregate aging of rural populations and imbalance of sex ratio (Hunter, 1967; Dema, 1968; Van Velsen, 1961; Henin, 1969; Lorimer, 1960; 1L0, 1970; 0minde, 1965). For instance, in his studies of population movements to the main urban areas of Kenya, 0minde (1965) concluded that because the age group 20-45 forms an important proportion of the rural population, their absence in the source regions constitutes a burden on those left behind. In the light of these observations, one can wonder to what extent Berg's (1960) idea of migration as an effective adaptation to the economies of West Africa is valid. Among other contributors to the current literature on rural-urban migration in Africa are Little (1965), Page (1965), Kuper (1965), Skinner (1965), Wallerstein (1965), McNulty (1966), and Gulliver (1965). They all see economic motivation as the most impelling force behind rural-urban migration in Africa. Little entitles his first chapter 34 "The Lure of Town" in which he emphasizes the effect of social and economic change on migration. He comments: "In the main, however, Western contact having erected needs and aspirations impossible to satisfy in the countryside, migration means a flight from land ... in many areas the town was the obvious place to earn cash.” Since rural-urban migration has given birth to organized groups of people in the urban areas, "organized groups" have also attracted the attention of many African urban scholars (see for example: Little, 1965; Southall, 1966; Richards, 1963; Epstein, 1958; and Nolpe, 1974). Little has provided a very comprehensive description of the role of voluntary associations as adaptive mechanisms linking social relation- ships which arose from pre-colonial subsistence economies with those evolving in contemporary West African societies based on the market economy. He sees voluntary associations; that is, formally organized ethnic groups, as the most unique core feature of urban social organiza- tion, social change and modernization. He draws attention to how volun- tary associations in various West African cities function to integrate recent migrants from rural areas and give economic and social assistance to urban dwellers. Also contributing to the issue of migration and ethnic groups, Southhall made the interesting observation that the towns- man passes through three stages: First, his "tribal" ties are stronger than any other ties; then, he begins to form urban tribal associations; and thirdly, he joins new associations based entirely on his new work in the urban area. Conditions in modern African towns are such that the network of ties are still mainly based on ethnic affiliation in the rural areas, 35 in the urban areas, and also between the two. As Richards (1963:49) noted: "... we find everywhere a variety of forms of social groupings and social ties which could be loosely classified as "multi-tribalism". Migration Studies in Calabar Though extensive studies of African migration exist, there have been only very few descriptive studies of migrants into Calabar city in recent years. In 1973, Udofot examined the impact of migration from the mainland part of the South Eastern State of Nigeria to Calabar. Among other relevant observations, he found a decline in supply, and a rise in the price of building materials such as mats (locally hand-made roof covers) in the villages, as a result of marked migration of youths to cities. This finding is in keeping with Udo's (1970) conclu- sion that as "a result of selective migrations, jobs formerly done by young men have suffered in several regions". That Udofot also found in the city "overcrowded schools and unemployed youths" underline the fact that uncontrolled rural-urban migration to a city yet unprepared to accept the migrants can exasparate problems both at the city and at the already poor rural areas. Other migration studies which relate to Calabar include: (1) Ekanem's (n.d.) study of the characteristics of migrants to Calabar from the surrounding areas; (2) Udo Amanam's (1971) study of the impact of migration and unemployment on the economic development of the three Eastern States; (3) Udo's (1970) analysis of migration in Nigeria, which focused on the economic, social and demographic aspects of move- ments of people from one rural to another rural area; 36 (4) Mabogunje's (1970) study which found Calabar as one of the major regions in Nigeria "taking more migrants than expected"; and (5) Abasiekong's (1977) two studies which focus on daily paid migrant workers, and the rural-urban socio-economic links of urban workers in Calabar. Abasiekong sees the constitution of Calabar as a State capital during the Civil War as a major attractive force in "the unprecedented migration of people from rural to urban areas notably to the state capital ... with attendant problems of housing, water and electricity supplies, roads, schools, and health facilities." In recognition of the imminent policy implications of this "unusual influx of migrants" to Calabar, he concludes: To avert this continuous, and undesirable influx of migrants into Calabar with its attendant social, political and economic problems, it is suggested that efforts be made to develop Local Government Headquarters, other smaller cities and rural areas in general to attract migrants, thereby relieving Calabar of its present and future burden of overpopulation and its negative impacts on the general development and planning (1977:21). One limitation of Abasiekong's suggestions is that they fail to indicate what should be done to ameliorate the problems created by migration at Calabar. The unanswered question still remains: Should social and economic planners intensify the exodus of people from rural areas or should a balanced policy of investment be encouraged to reduce the pressure of job seekers in the urban centers? Nobody seems to be sure as yet. Perhaps the answer is most likely to depend on a systematic analysis of the entire migration process. It will, therefore, depend to what extent planners can handle not only employment problems but the mounting urban housing deficits, and congestions that have resulted from rural-urban migration (Harrison, 1967; Harvey, 1968,1969). 37 HousingrRelated Studies Ne shape our buildings and afterwards our buildings will shape us (Winston Churchill). One thorny problem of rapidly growing urban centers in Africa is housing. On arrival in the urban center, one of the most critical questions is where the migrant shall stay. This matter is important because (1) housing is a basic human need which serves as a significant point from which its occupants interact with different social and economic scenes; and (2) most migrants on arrival, have neither property nor job, nor even a clear idea about the labor and urban housing market. As Grimes (l976:3) puts it, "Housing not only provides shelter for a family but also serves as a center for its total residential environ- ment.“' Thus, the Eastern Nigeria Housing Corporation (1964) recognized that “the provision of adequate housing is essential to the vital development of the social, political and economic progress of the Region and the inculcation of healthy and sanitary habits among the people of the Region." Because the housing deficit is closely related to rural-urban migration, it is a problem more in the urban than in rural areas. Dwyer (1975) directs attention to the "squatter hut" as the most strik- ing physical symptom of the general housing problem in the Third World. Another report described the types of housing commonly found in urban areas in Africa. They are: (1) Large, low—cost housing estates provided by municipal and governmental authorities; (2) houses built by Africans with local 38 material on plots made available by municipal authorities; (3) camp or barrack-type houses, consisting largely of dormitories built for transi- ent workers; and (4) slums, overcrowded settlements which have grown up without any particular plan or street layout (United Nations, 1957). In his study of Lagos, Sada (197l:9) identified three grades of residential land use: (1) the high-grade residential districts which fell into 4 groups: government housing, and private housing, quasi- government housing and private housing; (2) the medium-grade residential districts--characterized by a higher density of housing, a higher occupancy ratio, and a lower percentage of houses with social amenities than in the higher-grade districts; and (3) the lower-grade residential districts-~found in two areas: the blighted area in the central city, and a ring of newly developed areas immediately outside of the city boundary. The shortage of housing, with its corollary overcrowdedness, is widely known as the most serious urban problem in Africa (Sutherland, 1958; Koenigsberge, 1970; and Abrams, 1966). Nalsh (l974:8) notes that Ajeromi, a typical slum in Lagos "is crowded with migrants." Nolpe (1974:20) reports how in 1965 over 80,000 persons were crowded into a space of less than one square mile in Diobo, Port-Harcourt, while newly arrived immigrants were still moving into the area. According to Adeleye (1976) the high demand for good housing, both industrial and domestic, "has been aggravated in recent times by the rising tempo of our socio-economic development, and has no doubt resulted in urban con- gestion, slums and rising house rents." 39 Problems of slum clearance and rehousing have been raised. Marris (1962) contends that effective rehousing programs must fulfill two con- ditions: (l) the people must be able to afford the cost of new housing whether for rent or for purchase; and (2) they must be able to re- establish their patterns of life in the new surroundings. Turner (1967 and 1968), however, presented a forceful case for a different approach to physical planning and slum clearance. "The basic problem of slums," he maintained, “is not how to eradicate them but how to make them liveable." He, therefore, advocated the abandonment of the current orthodox modern "project approach to urban development and the substi- tution of a service approach." In other words, "government influence on development will be proportional to its understanding of ordinary people's needs,and its ability to work, not for them but with them." Other recommendations have been suggested to improve housing and general living conditions. Attention is called to the need for more research and interchange of ideas between the social researcher and the town planner (Report 1959: and Inter-American Labor Institute, 1959). Hazemann (1958) stressed the importance of psychological factors in the planning of urban housing, while other authors (Sutherland, 1956, and Grime, 1976) suggest that more houses be built at different income levels, more loans be made available, more firms be encouraged to house their employees, and more regulations be effected to define and control overcrowding in large rooming houses. The literature on housing condi- tions in Africa demonstrates the needs for research in this aspect of the urbanization process. 40 One pertinent question that often receives only passing attention in migration studies is: What role does the extended family play in ameliorating the problems of the tight urban housing market? It is sometimes hypothesized that the extended family is incompatible with urban living and values (Brown, 1963), but Eames (1967) provides a counter hypothesis which indicates that the "joint family is the facili- tating mechanism in the process of rural-urban migration. This hypothe- sis is supported by many scholars (Litwark, 1960; Caldwell, 1969; Firth, 1956), who have contributed to the concept of migration and the extended family. Historically the extended family has been known to encourage migration as a means of extending the opportunities of the family or kinship group. Because of the recent mounting urban housing problems, the role of the extended family to provide housing to migrants deserves very close attention. In Africa, the extended family has played a notable role in urban housing since the inception of cities. As Mabogunje (1962) pointed out, "Before the 20th century the extended family was the unit of town settlement...." Crooke also indicated how in Yoruba land, "emigrant populations traditionally maintained their urban residential rights even when conditions allowed them to settle closer to their farmlands." Today the long-established Yoruba towns still contain the “compounds" of large extended family groups, whose members and descendants regard the compound as "home" even though they may live mainly in the town's rural area or elsewhere. Thus, to a migrant from a Yoruba village, securing a place to live with relatives in the urban‘center is more an assured traditional privilege than a mere uncertain expectation. 41 This Yoruba example is a special case of urban housing in which migrants can claim rights to living quarters by means of kinship ties. Even in areas where there are no such claims to ancestral urban houses, most African migrants still rely on the extended family to house and feed them, free of charge, until they find jobs. In his extensive survey of both migrants and extended families in the villages and towns of Ghana, Caldwell found a significant level of reliance on the extended family for providing accommodation and housing information to migrants. For instance, he related: More often than not the migrant already knows when he dis- mounts from the mammy lorry in the lorry park, with whom he will be staying. Often he does not know how to get there. He will seek advice from bystanders, often from people from his own area (Caldwell, 1969:129). His rural survey indicated that over half the potential migrants expected initially to stay with relatives, and most rural households agree that town relatives are happy to help the new arrivals from the village; whereas, in the urban survey, of all types of help, housing ranked highest. The dominant role of the extended family over other sources of assistance is in keeping with the norm of the African family system where one's perception of who should help in time of need is in the form of a hierarchy. Often the order is from parents to immediate rela- tives, to friends, ethnic members, and others (Nabila, 1974:193-198). This system of providing accommodation by extended family can be held accountable for the spatial allocation of migrants in easily definable ethnic clusters in African Cities. 42 The point to note is that the absorption of the migrant at the urban end is not only "occupational" but ”residential" (Mabogunje, 1970). Calabar is blessed with housing studies and programs such as: (l) the Louis Berger‘s (1975) ”Study of Housing Needs and Demand in Urban Development in the South Eastern State of Nigeria"; (2) the Cross River State of Nigeria (1975) "Housing Enquiry“; (3) the South Eastern State of Nigeria (1973) "Staff Housing Rules"; and (4) the Cross River State Housing Corporation. But none of these studies and/or programs have any specific policies that deal with the "residential absorption" of migrants in Calabar. Policy on migration should be directed not only to alleviating employment problems, as has more often been the case, but to the solving of urban housing problems. Over-crowded and inadequate urban housing means that policies toward rural-urban migration should‘ be accompanied by efforts not only to improve urban housing conditions and supply, but to stem the uncontrolled rural-urban migration. "The city administration can ensure availability of relatively cheap and adequate housing in quantities which could make the transition of the rural migrant either difficult or easy" (Mabogunje, 1970). Finally, it must be remembered that such a combination of forces is involved in the migration process that housing policies should not be considered in isolation but as part of a system of inter- related parameters in the planning of population distribution and economic development. For instance, efforts to provide adequate urban housing should be coordinated with well-planned rural development 43 programs which aim at restricting the rural exodus. Job opportunities in rural areas must be accompanied by amenities to satisfy both the curious and the "economic“ man. Unless rural inhabitants have jobs and income, amenities such as hospitals, schools, cinemas and electricity, will exert little attraction. On the other hand, an urban job and income without decent urban housing is a degradation. There is also a need for careful coordination and administration of the urban housing suppliers, namely: (1) private house owners and landlords; (2) private employers; and (3) government employers and government housing programs. These sources along with the "popular" government housing program have been inadequate in solving the growing urban housing problems. As Harrison (1967) observes, the Libyan govern- ment's low-cost housing project is "not enough to solve the housing problem." The Nigerian government has earmarked 2.7 billion dollars for attacking the housing issue. Of the 60,000 residential units pro- posed to be built for middle and low income groups, only 15,000 units are ready for use; and, considering the acute housing problem, this has been described as "a drop in an ocean." Clearly, any government housing program which is not integrated with private efforts to stimulate the private housing market will con- tinue to be "a drop in the ocean." Also, due to the high rate of African rural-urban migration, even the grandest urban housing scheme which does not consider the impact of individual migration would be self-defeating. 44 The literature review has stressed the role of education in migra- tion as the aspect of social life which relates most closely to the quality of housing in which a man lives. According to Jilly (1961) since education is a process that includes tastes and standards of judgment, it is no surprise to find that quality of housing is a varia- ble affected by degree of exposure to education. Other points of empha- sis in the literature review included the role of the extended family in the migration process and housing, and the acute housing deficiencies resulting from rural-urban migration in the developing countries. Based on the literature review and research objectives previously stated, the following hypotheses are, therefore, derived: H: 1 There is a positive relationship between the size of house- hold and the number of migrants from the family. H: 2 In the rural areas, there is a POSlthE relationship be- tween the number of migrants from a household and the level of education; that is, the higher the education level of a household, the more the number of migrants from it. H: 3 There is a positive relationship between a migrants' level of education and the quality of his housing. H: 4 In the urban area, the duration of a migrant's stay in the city is positively related to housing quality; that is, the longer the duration in years of a migrants' stay in the city, the better the quality of his housing. This is derived from the hypothesis that since migrants are often late-comers in a competitive housing market, they have to 45 take poor quality accommodations which are left over by permanent residents. H: 5 Kinship is positively related to the provision of accommodations for migrants. The closer the relationships of the urban host the more willing he or she is to provide accommodation to a migrant. H: 6 Room density is negatively related to satisfaction in housing; that is, the higher the room density of a house, the less satisfaction such a house gives to its residents. Research Design and Method of Analysis Rationale for Using Survey Methodology The research involved the collection of data on demography, economy, housing conditions, and the social and environmental context of a sampled population of Calabar and its rural hinterland. In the ab- sence of adequate and accurate data on migration and housing in the study area, a sample survey methodology was used for the bulk of the data. Specifically, the following methods were used in obtaining data on which this study is based: (1) field observation, (2) field inter- viewing, (3) questioning officials and other authorities, and (4) con- sulting published materials. The basic research instrument was, therefore, a formal interview schedule (Appendix 1). Open interview schedules which allowed respond- ents to provide their own answers were largely used, instead of ques- tionnaires. The main difference between interview schedules and questionnaires is that while schedules are administered by an interview- er who asks the question and writes down the answers, questionnaires 46 are self-administered; that is, they are completed by the respondents (Peil, 1972). There are other special advantages for using the survey method for the study. Consideration of the objectives of research are critical for the methods used in collecting data; in this case, the survey method provided an opportunity for in-depth probing and examination of problems related to the objectives of this research. Donald Bogue (1959) has emphasized the need to "expand the list of factors affecting migration ... little, if any of this information is available from official sources." Wilkie (1971) adds that in "expanding this list of variables through a case study method, factors are placed in the context of a real situation and not left out of context as most frequently happens." He describes the interview schedule method as "... participant observa- tion where the researcher knows the subjects personally, and helps the investigator to eliminate random erroneous results in the interpreta- tion of the data." It is specially quite relevant and pragmatic, as Hance (1970) concluded: "Emphasis in migration should be placed on the design of studies to collect data not available from census and other administrative sources, and to exploit new opportunities that are aris- ing as by-products of human population study." Data Limitations It should be noted that data, especially on migration, are not easy to come by in Nigeria. Although “conventional population censuses provide the most accessible source of data for demographic research" (Robertson, 1969), their adequacy, accuracy and reliability for purposes 47 of migration studies in African countries have been questioned by many demographic and development scholars such as Hance (1970), Stolper (1967), Adepoju and Ekanem (1975), and Uyanga (1975). Nigeria, for instance, has had up to three well-known censuses in the last quarter of the century, but none of them has been of sufficient level of relia- bility to enable one to make accurate statements about the general population characteristics of the country, let alone, about migration in specific localities. As Mabogunje (1970:248) puts it: "The Nigerian censuses are never set up to collect migration data." The faults of the 1963 Nigerian census have been critically discussed by Ekanem (1972). Chief among the errors of the census include: (1) inflated settlement population; (2) the Creation, or pseudo-creation of fictitious settle- ments; and (3) omission of some settlements altogether. Clearly, the use of lists of settlements in such census reports for sampling can be quite misleading. The deficiencies of census and survey data have imposed such considerable limitations on the systematic analysis of migration that Pool (1969:169) argues that "for migration ... we have skeleton, and some flesh." On the grounds of the inadequacy and in- accuracy of the Nigerian censuses on the whole range of information needed for research on migration, many migration experts in Nigeria-- Prothero (1959), Ejiogu (1968), Olusanga (1969), Adepoju (1974), and Abasiekong (1976) have resorted to ag_hgg_sample surveys for data on migration. The research presented here is no exception; that is, it also relies on the survey method for the bulk of the data. 48 Field Research Strategies Reconnaissance Survey and Research Assistants The first part of the field work was used for a reconnaissance survey of the study area and the hiring of research assistants. Considerable time was spent on studying maps, basic documents and directories of the study area, to detennine the routes, and villages, parts of the town, and persons to visit. Then, one week was spent travelling through the town and villages observing the general physical and socio-economic conditions of the area. During that time conversa- tions were held with different classes of rural and urban people. In the town different institutions were visited, including the University of Calabar. Some members of the staff in the Geography and Sociology departments of the University were quite willing to read through the interview schedule and offer useful criticisms and suggestions on the basis of their experience in the area. As a result of such input, as well as the observations, casual encounters, and informal interviews, some modifications were made to the interview schedules. Talking to the traditional chiefs, teachers, and peasants in the rural areas also gave an idea of possible problems to be expected in the rural survey. It would have been difficult to carry out a research project of this type and magnitude without assistance. Field assistants were therefore used for interviewing purposes. The selection of such assist- ants was critical for the success of the study. Especially in the rural area, where research of this nature is still largely unknown, it was necessary to hire assistants with ability, interest, and familiarity 49 with the local people. Grade 11 teachers working in the rural areas were found to be especially suitable for the rural survey. Their famil- iarity with the local people and environment was considered an important qualification for the maintenance of a rapport with typically rather suspicious rural peasants. With the help of different headmasters of primary schools, in the villages visited during the reconnaisance survey, it was possible to recruit such teachers. The selection of assistants for the urban survey was on the basis of their familiarity with the assigned sectors of the city, as well as personal interest and experience at census data collection. All of the four assistants finally selected for the research were Efik speaking men with a good knowledge of the English language. Their duties involved interpreting and explaining (where necessary), and completing the inter- view schedules. Prior to the actual field work an intensive interviewer training session was conducted. The assistants were introduced to both the principles of interviewing, and the purpose of the sample survey. They were given detailed instructions, and practice on how to translate and complete the schedules properly. Before starting them on their own, I visited and supervised each assistant as he interviewed a few house- holders in the respective sectors. Sample Design Given the spatial variations of migrants and other phenomena under study, to obtain an adequate sample in the various sectors of the study area, a stratified random sample design was used to select householders 50 for the research. A stratified sample is one in which the study area is subdivided into strata. Sampling points within each stratum are then chosen randomly, systematically or in an aligned fashion (Berry and Baker, 1968). Stratification of the study area has the advantage of ensuring the representation of specified sub-groups within the over- all sample (Sjoberg and Nett, 1968). The first step in the sampling was to examine a street map of Calabar city, and also a map of Calabar Division. The divisional map is sub-divided into Development Areas and Villages. The sub-divisions were used as the basis for the stratification of the study area. Secondly, a list of the villages in the 13 Development Areas which make up the study area was made. The map of Calabar city, showing streets and residential density, was used for the urban sample. The city was divided into zones, and the zones were subdivided into 22 blocks for a systematic sampling of the householders on the selected streets. Since exclusive emphasis on studying migration at either the rural or urban end of the process alone gives only a one-side picture, data were collected in both rural and urban areas. This procedure was intended to facilitate direct comparison of rural and urban responses, and also attitudinal characteristics. Rural Survey A simple random number table was used systematically to select 20.3 percent of the villages in the 13 Development Areas. Thus, out of a total 334 villages, 63 were selected. From these selected villages about 10 householders per village were chosen for interviewing. 51 Because of the diversity in both village size and the spatial distribu- tion of houses within the villages, no fixed number, or uniform selec- tion technique was used in selecting houses or householders. However, the guiding principle was to interview a cross-section of the sampled village, selecting only one household per house. For instance, large villages were divided into sectors, and householders selected randomly from the different sectors. In some cases, a system of selecting house- holders in every other house, or in every two houses, etc., was adopted. Up to 20 householders were interviewed in a very large village; whereas, about 5 interviews were considered enough in a small village. The rural survey covered a total of 729 respondents. Urban Data Collection Using a simple random numbers table, thirty percent of the city blocks were selected. Then a list of the streets in the sampled blocks was made for a systematic sampling of thirty percent of the streets in each block. In each of the selected residential buildings on the sampled streets one householder within it was interviewed. Altogether 896 householders were interviewed in the urban survey, thus covering 4.7 percent of the estimated urban households. The interview schedule for the urban survey contained items rang- ing from background questions, to questions regarding migration history, housing conditions, perception of rural and urban life, and policy sug- gestions. The rural survey questions were, in most parts, consistent with those of the urban survey, though they included specific questions 52 about the destinations of rural migrants, and about return migrants in the households (see Appendix 2). Special Interviews In order to obtain information of specific policy significance it was necessary to conduct special interviews with persons in some key decision-making positions in the study area. Among such persons who provided expert, policy-relevant information on migration and housing problems were: (1) Dr. P. E. B. Inyang, Head, Department of Geography, University of Calabar; (2) Dr. Edet Abasiekong, Department of Sociology, University of Calabar; (3) Mr. E. A. Etuk, Chief Town Planning Officer, Urban Development Division, Calabar; (4) Mr. D. E. Udo, Chief Statisti- cian, Ministry of Finance and Economic Development; (5) Mr. A. Deb, Chief Architect, Cross River State Housing Corporation; and (6) Mr. Uko Inoyo, Assistant General Manager, Cross River State Housing Corporation. Methods of Analysis Three statistical techniques are used to analyze the data: (1) the chi square, (2) multiple regression, and (3) incidence factor analysis. The chi square statistic is particularly useful in the test of difference between the rural and urban responses. Multiple regres- sion is useful in testing the relationship between the independent and the dependent variables of the hypotheses. Incidence factor analysis, using ones to denote the presence, and zeros the absence, of 27 housing characteristics (Appendix 1), is used to determine housing categories 53 and their spatial distribution in Calabar. These selected statistical techniques are further explained where they are used in the text. CHAPTER III THE MIGRATION PROCESS IN CALABAR Historical Background The Importance of Calabar The importance of Calabar lies in its past which can help both in the understanding of the present, and in the planning of the future. Owing to its favorable location on the east bank of the Cross River which forms the major drainage system of the area, Calabar was naturally well placed to control trade over a large area, in the days when long distance trade in Nigeria was carried on by water. In the 18th and 19th centuries, Old Calabar, as it was then known, controlled the trade of the whole of the Cross River Basin (Jennings, 1966). By the 1830's the palm oil trade had made Calabar famous. For twenty years, 1885-1906, °it was the capital of the Oil Rivers Protectorate (then of the Niger Coast Protectorate) and of the Protectorate of Southern Nigeria. During that period, the whole of Southern Nigeria was administered from Calabar. The Cross River had then become a busy commercial highway, as "exports via Calabar port constituted a major part of the total Nigerian exports up to and including the First World War" (Ekong, 1974:5). Writing on the impact of the international economy upon a tradi- tional society (that is, old Calabar from 1600 to 1891), Latham (1973) indicates how in those early days the palm oil trade in Calabar expanded 54 55 from 1,000 tons per annum to over 7,000 tons in about eighty years(Figure 3-1). He also cites the demands of the expanding international economy as the main force which acted to change Calabar society. Until the arrival of the Europeans the inhabitants of this area were fishermen. But the advent of the Europeans radically changed the social and economic life of the people. The people of Calabar quickly adapted to the English ways of life, acting as middlemen in the flourishing trade. Concerning such trade connections, the former Military Governor of the South Eastern State concluded: The ancient City of Calabar has had over four centuries of connections with what is usually called the Modern World. Traders, missionaries, colonial agents, and administrators did flourishing business (Esuene, 1976). But thereafter, Calabar underwent a systematic decline, falling from its historical, political and economic position of pre-eminence to a position in the background. Its future was initially ruined by the amalgamation of Southern Nigeria and Lagos in 1906, as Lagos became the new seat of government. Between 1920 and 1966 Calabar passed through three stages into complete stagnation. The first stage began after the First World War, when a period of stagnation set in. During and after the Second World War, from 1939 to 1954, the area passed through another critical stage in which major economic shifts were made by traders to areas west of Calabar. As Latham (1973:150) put it: I'During the forties and fifties, Calabar remained a backwater." But between 1954 and 1966, it was in its last stage of decline in which little if any of the export-import trade passed through the Cross River waterways. "The port (thus) became almost a ghost town“ (Ekong, 1974). 56 PALM OIL EXPORTS FROM OLD CALABAR M812! - lEfli? Tons of Thousands ' u ‘ b . , , -_ . .‘ ', . . ‘. .‘ ‘ ' ’ . .0 n '. ,' t. ‘- . :_ . . - .. 1800 1840 1860 1880 Sourcv Latham, 1973, p.65. Figure 3-1 57 Latham attributes this utter decline of Calabar to the "political wranglings of the post-independence era of the sixties which made matters worse. Because Calabar chose to back the Action Group rather than the National Council of Nigeria and Cameroon, it was largely excluded from the latter's economic policy." The growth in the impor- tance of land transport was another significant factor in the decline of Calabar. Prior to the establishment of the South Eastern State, this area was part of Nigeria's Eastern Region, whose capital was in Enugu, and Calabar's connection with other parts of the region was based on river transportation. Its few road connections are impeded by the spurs of the granite mountains that reach the Cross River and the absence of bridges over that river. Its main contact with the rest of the region is by a ferry to Oron where a road leads to centers of population in the mainland areas. With the discovery of a deep-water harbor at Port Harcourt in 1913, and the decision to develop it as the railway terminal for the country east of the Niger, Calabar's hopes of develop- ment as an entreport were destroyed. Thus, the development and improve- ment of railways and highways in other parts of the region, and the neglect of Calabar in such road improvement supplanted the river as a primary means of communication, contributing to the decline of Calabar as a port city and center of commerce. People and Migration History Ethno-linguistically, Calabar is regarded as semi-bantu. The orig- inal inhabitants of the region comprise the Efik, the Qua and the Efut (Figure 3-2). Although they are known to have arrived at different times, 58 T THE ORIGINAL INHABITANTS OF CALABAR / , O o / ‘ 6‘ ° 4’ mm 0 I . s" \ a Q~ .. .‘ ‘ 6 ° ‘0 3 0 0“ . a .\ o \3/ J o o I o 000 0,", ’0 1’ c Q U A F I Creek Town 4' c 0 puke Town E F U T Henshow Town 0 — 0&9 ' 3° 30' I | souncs' Afigbo, 1965. s°oo‘ _— 5° 30’ —- 5° 00' — 4°oo' --4 9° 00' Figure 3-2 59 the main settlement pattern was established before the end of the six- teenth century (Lathan, 1973:5). In the 18th and 19th centuries Old Calabar consisted of the trading republics of Henshaw Town, Duke Town and Greek Town. It is still uncertain which of the three groups first settled in Calabar. Sometimes it is assumed that the Qua and the Efut arrived before the Efik. As one report puts it: The Qua people were the original holders of Kalabar.... The Kalabar (Efik) authorities pay a yearly tribute to the Qua peOple for permission to reside in their territory ... the whole territory on the east of the Cross River belonged to the people of Qua (Hutchinson, 1858:128-99). Afigbo (1965) offers a comprehensive discussion of the controversy about the origin and settlement of the three groups. His review mere- ly underlies the "vehement disagreement which exists between assumptions and surviving Efik traditions" about the Efik origin and migrations. But in spite of this controversy, it is generally recognized that while the Qua and Efut are essential elements that constitute the original inhabitants of Calabar, "the Efik are the dominant ethnic group" (Ogar, 1976). Besides, the Efik has had a reputation for oppress- ing their neighbors; the very word "Efik" means "oppressors". According to oral Efik tradition and some written documents (Waddell, 1863); Goldie, 1901), the Efik came out of Ibibio, a territory which extends from the Cross River to the Ibo land on the Niger, to settle at Calabar. Though the Efik admit that their last place of settlement before they moved to Calabar was Uruan, an Ibibio Clan, they deny that they are Ibibio. In the words of a prominent Efik man: 60 We the Efik settled first at Ibom in Aro District and for this reason the name "Ibom" has been used by the Efik man to describe whatever to him is mighty.... Owing to defeat in war we left Ibom and settled in Uruan from where we were driven again by the Uruan who said we oppressed them. It was after this that we split into two main groups, one of which came down to Calabar (Henshaw, 1965:269). Internal wars of the 17th century also sent the Qua and the Efut fleeing to Calabar. The Qua are a segment of the Ekoi people who were driven to Calabar by the Mbokang War. The Efut were linked with the Cameroon until they migrated to their present home to escape an internal war. The outcome of the Nigerian civil war has resulted in marked improvement in the position of modern Calabar. With the constitution of Calabar as the capital of the new State the area has entered another stage in its development, assuming new forces of attraction. "There seems to be every reason to suppose that now that the development of South Eastern State is in its own hands, Calabar will recover its former prominence" (Afigbo, 1965:150). Clearly, for more numerous and complex reasons than just the drive of internal wars, Calabar is now destined to attract more than three ethnic groups. Already the area is reputed as one of the major destination regions in Nigeria taking more migrants than expected (Udo, 1970:Figure 6). The remaining section of this chapter will, therefore, attempt to identify the main causal factors that help to explain the magnitude of rural-urban migration in Calabar. 61 Determinants of Migration Attempts at understanding causative factors are an essential step in any study of policy implications of rural-urban migration. The search for the causes of migration is not a search for the obvious, as it appears on the surface. It is true that "Behind the simplicity of the causes of migration lies a complexity which has not yielded easily to analysis" (Mitchell, 1959:13). People decide to move or stay at home for diverse, interconnected reasons. No two individuals, for instance, arrive at the decision to migrate or stay at home by the same combina- tion of reasons. Clearly, the causes of migration are complicated, ranging from economic opportunities to mere curiosity to move, with various mixes of motives. Thus, in order to appreciate the process of causality in migration, we must attempt to identify and link together the salient multiple causes and relate them in some framework. The search for the causes of migration is important, especially from the policy point of view, because uncovering the root causes of migration is one way in which to ameliorate the undesirable consequences of the phenomenon. Rural-Urban Push and Pull A recurring question in migration is: Why do migrants pour into urban areas when the chances of their finding jobs and adequate housing for their families are quite limited? The answer to this question gen- erally takes the forms often referred to as "push" and "pull" (Ross, 1973:39). Because the interrelationship of many factors are involved in migration decisions, Morse (1965) has pointed out that push factors 62 MAJOR DESTINATION AREAS OF /’-'~-... . / \_ ’ I . Sok.oto u’.-. . I, ..M ~. ~ /. Lm ./ \.~,/ ' MIGRANTS IN NIGERIA \ 4 MILES Direction of migrant labor movements. Major destination areas of migrants. Adapted from Prothero, 1962. plSl. Figure 3-3 63 alone cannot explain the whole migration process. To him, migration is not necessarily a demographic response to specific social and economic conditions, but a direct and an overt behavioral response. This observ- ation suggests the need to tie push-pull factors to attitudes and decisions of individuals. The push-pull theory is still a useful framework for discussing the determinants of rural-urban migration. The push factors suggest that life is so bad in the rural areas that individuals know there is no chance for improvement. This condition was obvious during the present rural survey in Calabar. Such push factors include all the negative aspects of rural life--the low productivity, resulting from, among other factors, lack of modern farm tools and use of poor methods of cultivation; limited job opportunities and the attendant poverty; the lack of infra- structure, social amenities, medical facilities, water and good housing; family difficulties, hatred and witchcraft. These push factors operate by pushing people out of the rural areas to towns. Thus people leave the rural areas for the following categories of reasons: 1. When it becomes impossible to earn enough for subsistence on their land. This may be due to diminishing productivity of farmland, division of farmland into unproductive units through inheritance, economic reversals, or natural disasters. 2. When it becomes impossible to earn enough money for subsistence as individuals working as laborers on large farms or planta- tions are displaced by technological innovations. 64 3. If they are deviants in the local social structure. They may be women who are barren, or men who have been branded publicly as thieves or outlaws. 4. If they are victims of the social distortion caused by wars, revolution or social ferment. The last Nigerian civil war helped to push people seeking protection and means of subsist- ence into Calabar. 5. If they want to escape traditional tribal obligations and and taxes. Respondents in the sampled villages were asked to give reasons why people are moving from their villages to Calabar. Lack of employment opportunities represents the most frequently mentioned (73.0 percent of the respondents) of reasons offered as the major causes of rural-urban migration (Table 3.1). A question seeking reasons for migration was also directed to the migrants in Calabar city. Various combinations of reasons selected from eight factors were given by the respondents as the factors which pushed them to the city (Table 3.2). It should be noted that transfer cannot be considered as strictly a push factor, as it refers mainly to people who moved as a result of official or institutional transfers with little or no personal input by the mover in the major decision to move. As in the rural survey, lack of employment opportunities (with 46.6 per- cent) was the most popular in the mixes of reasons given by the urban respondents. Table 3.2 also indicates that about 5 percent of the 65 Table 3.1. Percent distribution of responses to the question: Why are people moving from this village to Calabar? Percent Responses Distribution N Lack of employment opportunities 73.0 529 Lack of amenities 10.7 78 Lack of trading facilities 9.8 71 Lack of educational facilities 6.5 47 Total 100.0 725 Table 3.2. Percent distribution of responses to the question: What were your reasons for migrating to Calabar? Percent Responses Distribution N Lack of employment opportunities 46.6 368 Lack of educational facilities 12.4 98 Transfer 9.8 78 Lack of trading facilities 9.4 74 To get civilized 7.9 62 Lack of amenities 4.9 39 To avoid hatred 4.6 36 War 4.4 35 Total 100.0 790 66 respondents left the rural area to avoid hatred. Apart from the general conflict between individuals, ”ifot", that is, witchcraft, was mentioned as part of the rural conflict which pushes some people to Calabar. It should be noted that the study area has had a notorious history of witchcraft. There is no wonder that "ifot" also plays some part in rural-urban migration in this part of Nigeria. The "pull" answer looks at the causes of migration from the urban angle and emphasizes reasons why the city attracts immigrants. The focus is on the prospects for a steady cash income, the existence of better schools, all those necessities of life that are lacking in the rural areas, or simply the "bright lights" theory. Briefly, the "bright lights" theory as postulated by Gulliver (1957:58) stresses the excitement of being "where the action is". It describes the exciting attractions of city life, with its brightly lit shop windows, the hustle and bustle of urban living, the cinemas, the entertainment, the sporting and welfare facilities, as against the dull, dark and boring rural areas. Though economic factors play an important role, bright lights still play a part in the decision to migrate. People are attracted to the city for the following reasons: 1. They believe they can earn income that is higher than that available in the rural areas. 2. They feel that there will be better opportunities for education and employment for their children. 3. They have heard stories of urban life from relatives and friends and want to experience it themselves. 67 4. They wish to enjoy the technological features of modern society which are mainly confined to the urban areas. Thus, Ross (1973:39) describes the city as "a magnet". The pull- ing effect of Calabar is so great that though migrants to the city may not generally be under the illusion that they will become rich by living in town, they generally contend that while only a few "make it" in the city, almost no one in their position in the rural community will see any change in his life at all. Consequently, regardless of its numer- ous problems and repulsive features, as perceived by most respondents (Tables 3.3; 3.4; 3.5), Calabar still stands out as the most attractive spot in the region. Table 3.3. Percent distribution to the question: What do you dislike about Calabar? Percent Urban Percent Rural Responses Respondents Respondents 1. High cost of living 37.5 58.6 2. Housing problems 18.5 13.5 3. Unemployment 17.2 4.1 4. High rent . 10.4 8.8 5. Other (pollution, thieves, etc.) 16.0 14.8 6. No answer 0.4 0.2 Total 100.0 (895) 100.0(725) Chi Square = 15.814 4 df Sig. = 9.001 68 Table 3.3 shows that both urban and rural respondents recognize high cost of living as the most outstanding source of hardship in Calabar. But rural respondents dread high cost of living in Calabar more than the urbanites. Other reasons why they dislike Calabar in— clude housing problems such as congestion; unemployment; high house rent; prevalence of thieves; accidents and pollution. Table 3.4 reveals that up to 73.1 percent of urban respondents and a lower proportion of rural respondents (62.2 percent) perceive Calabar as the place where people worry more about having money to care for themselves and their families. Very few respondents (1.2 percent in the urban and 0.1 per- cent in the rural areas) are not sure where people experience more financial hardships. Table 3.4. Percent distribution of responses to the question: Where do people worry more about having money to care for themselves and their families? (Rural and urban surveys) Percent Urban Percent Rural Responses Respondents Respondents Town 73.1 62.2 Village 25.7 37.7 Not sure 1.2 0.1 Total 100.0 100.0 As Table 3.5 indicates, to most migrants the realities of town life do not match their hopes. Up to 81.8 percent of urban respondents 69 are not as satisfied with town life as they had hoped; whereas, only 54.8 percent of rural respondents think that migrants in towns are not satisfied. This indicates that rural people with lack of personal experience still have a more inflated opinion about urban life than the urbanites. Table 3.5. Percent distribution of responses to the question: Do migrants in towns generally find town life as satisfac- tory as they had hoped? Percent Yes No Uncertain Total Urban responses 16.1 81.8 2.1 100.0 Rural responses 45.1 54.8 0.1 100.0 However, in spite of the foregoing negative aspects of city life, most respondents still admit that in comparison with the rural area, Calabar city has such better living conditions that village youths are better off in town than in the rural areas (Tables 3.6 and 3.7). Over 80 percent of the urban and rural respondents indicated that in terms of economic, social, and physical facilities, Calabar provides better living conditions than rural areas. Consequently, as Table 3.7 shows, 62.8 percent of the urban and 56.0 percent of the rural respond- ents are in favor of village youths moving to towns. Mayer's (1963) idea of "cities as paradoxes" is true of Calabar. The city may produce from its growth poor local environment for its inhabitants, but it\ still has more in-migrants than out-migrants. 70 Table 3.6. Percent distribution responses to the question: Where are better living conditions? (Urban and rural surveys) Percent Urban Percent Rural Responses Respondents Respondents Town 81.2 88.3 Village 18.0 11.3 No difference 0.8 0.4 Total 100.0 100.0 Table 3.7. Percent distribution responses to the question: Is it a good thing for village youths to move to town? Percent Yes No Uncertain Total Urban responses 62.8 35.5 1.7 100.0 Rural responses 56.0 44.0 0.0 100.0 One problem with the push-pull theory is that it fails to consider town and country as one socio-economic field in which to analyze the forces operating within it. However, it is still useful to look at the sources and destination areas of migrants to identify the attractive and repulsive elements which operate to push, pull or retain people. As outlined by the members of the Inter-African Conference on Housing and Urbanization (C.S.A. 1959:30), it is easy to sum up the many causes 71 of migration into two segments: (1)"Unattractiveness of the rural areas"; and (2) "attractiveness of the town"; and these are not too dissimilar from Lee's theoretical factors. Rural-Urban Imbalance The foregoing section viewed causal factors in migration from the source-destination perspectives. It thus set the stage for another significant feature in the determinants of rural-urban migration in Calabar-~that is, the role of rural-urban imbalance. This, a visible characteristic of Calabar and its hinterland, describes the disparities in the spatial distribution of physical, social and economic facilities in the region. If people in Calabar city are poor, those in rural areas are poverty stricken. If urban infrastructure, education, health and social facilities are inadequate, in the rural areas they are almost nonexistent. "Even when conditions are seen as bad in the city, rural alternatives are perceived as worse" (Leeds, 1970), and Calabar region is no exception. Rural-urban imbalance, is basically a symptom of economic under- development. It is not only a major factor in the decision to migrate but can have a paralytic effect on the development of the less fortu- nate sectors of the economy. The writings of Boeke (1953), Furnivall (1956), and Singer (1964) on dual economies analyze the mutual inter- action of economic and noneconomic forces under the special condition of colonialism the transactions between the European, commercial- industrial sector and the traditional tribal or peasant hinterland. It should be noted that much of this analysis remains relevant for the 72 post-colonial period in those underdeveloped regions where there exists sharp dichotomy between the urban-commercial-export sector and tradi- tional, village subsistence economies. Porter's observation is also relevant for Calabar: Maldistribution is the central fact in underdevelopment. Distortions in resource use have been increasing ... between the already wealthy and the poor (1974:18). Clearly, the underdeveloped nature of the socio-economic system of African rural areas on the one hand, and the existence of "exploding", "parasitic" cities on the other hand is greatly perpetuated by the maintenance of the structure of inequalities. In Nigeria the limited structure of privileges has been known to be accessible to a very small percentage of the population. Speaking of inequalities at the University of Ife, Chief Awolowo (1973) declared: "Poverty, ignorance, and disease are in evidence everywhere, more particularly in the rural areas!‘ Professor F. Olu Okedji (1974) also pointed to the existence of: "... urban-rural differentials to the extent that students from the better secondary schools in the urban areas are more represented proportionately than students from rural areas." Calabar finds itself in this situation where the good things of life are assured to a small minority and usually denied to the vast majority, the consequence of which is the drift of people to the town, in the struggle for the limited privileges. Agricultural practice and management also contribute to rural- urban imbalance. Though over 63 percent of the rural, and less than 2 percent of the urban population, are employed in agriculture, the tools 73 and methods used are not conducive to high productivity. Hence, agri- culture fails to appeal to ambitious, progressive youths. Crude, primitive tools such as matchets, axes, hoes and sticks are still used in clearing the bush and digging the ground. Shifting agriculture, or slash and burn, is the popular technique; the bush is cleared and left to dry, and fire is set to the cleared bush before various crops are inter-planted. After harvesting, the area is left fallow for a set number of years during which time cultiva- tion process is shifted to other areas. Though Gourou (1965) has described shifting agriculture as an excellent adaptation to tropical environment, its problems and limitations are many: (1) since the technique invests nothing in the form of manure in the soil, the result is often low yield and subsistence level of production; (2) it seldom succeeds for more than a few years in one spot, because of erosion, declining soil fertility, rapid increase of weeds and pests; (3) diffi- culties of clearing the bush and weeding with crude tools; (4) the absence of draft animals to aid human efforts; (5) the lack of insect and rodent control; and (6) as a result of the above limitations, the general law status of agriculture and its unpopularity among youths and the educated elements of the Nigerian society. Furthermore, the wealth generated by the agricultural sector has been known to be largely gravitated to urban areas. Even the very marketing boards, which should have served as a vehicle for agricultural price stabilization as well as reducing rural-urban income gap, are known for promoting the spatial disparities in economic development by 74 "investing a substantial proportion of the funds they accumulate in projects which largely benefit the nonfarm sector" (Essen, 1971). Though they were originally established for the benefit of the producers, marketing boards have become what Prest (1962:19) calls: "... a perman- ent instrument of taxation of the producer group it is supposed to represent." The poor conditions of Nigerian rural areas, particularly of the peasant farmers, were recognized as a factor in migration by the respondents to Essang's (1972) interview with sampled policy makers. They, therefore, suggested the need to provide specific projects to raise the standard of agricultural practice and the well-being of farmers while at the same time reducing the concentration of amenities in towns, as one means of "arresting the tide of rural-urban migration." The relatively poorer conditions of the rural areas in Calabarare strikingly evident in the rural-urban income differentials. According to the surveys the mean annual income for rural respondents was only $508; whereas, for the urban respondents it averaged $1756--over three times higher than that of rural respondents. Though cost of living is relatively lower in the rural areas, considering the opportunity costs of foregoing many urban amenities, rural inhabitants are still worse off than the urbanites in terms of income. Because of the difficulties in obtaining detailed, accurate data on rural income, one has to be careful in using rural-urban income differentials as an index of rural- urban migration. The basic problems include: (1) measurement of the relevant rural income, (2) measurement of the relevant urban income, and (3) comparing the two incomes (Byerlee, 1972). Also demonstrating 75 the problems involved in comparing rural and urban incomes in developing countries, Knight observed: ... we need a fine classification of rural and urban incomes by all the socio-economic characteristics which distinguish migrants and nonmigrants; both for rural and urban popula- tions as a whole, and also for intending rural and recent (urban) migrants (1972:208). In spite of the difficulties in measuring the degree of differentials, the low income earning capacity of people in rural Calabar whether in paid jobs (which are very few) or full-time farming is well documented (Udo, 1971; Udo, 1964; Udofot, 1973). The dwindling interest in rural life and the growing interest in urban life was well brought out by a migrants answer to the question: "Why do you think people are moving from villages to Calabar?" He de- clared: "People are losing interest in farm work whereas interest in town work is soaring. In the villages one has to wait for farm products to grow until harvesting seasons. The mad rush for Naira means that one has to know where to go for regular income." .Another migrant succinctly replied to the same question: "Town conditions generate progress faster than rural conditions." The town conditions referred to here include facilities such as better educational institutions, better housing, more and better medical facilities, a better transporta- tion system and means of communication, a good water supply, electricity, better market facilities, and social and entertainment facilities such as bars, cinemas, dance clubs, sporting facilities, and so on. The lure of Calabar will remain quite irresistable to a great number of rural people until the wide gap between rural and urban conditions is reduced. 76 Socio-economic Characteristics of Migrants An analysis of the forces affecting migration requires information about who the migrants are and usually leads to the realization that there is a great deal of diversity within the migrant population. In the African migration literature it is generally agreed that migration is highly selective with regard to age, sex, education, occupational contrasts and marital status (Hance, 1970; Southhall, 1961; Hunter, 1965:280). This section will, therefore, focus on these diverse charac- teristics of migrants in Calabar. Age and Sex Age and sex have long been known as prime determinants of propen- sity to migrate. The rural survey shows that a majority of migrants from rural areas are young (Table 3.8), most between the ages of 20 and 35. Over 80 percent of the migrants are below 34 years of age; whereas, only 5 percent are above 45 years. Only 1.4 percent of the migrants are over 55 years old. The urban survey also reveals that it is pre- dominantly young adults who make up the recent migrants. Of those who moved to Calabar during the last ten years, 48.1 percent of them are in the 20 to 29 age group. Thomilson's (1965) explanation for the predominance of the young in migration streams is that mobility is easier for the young because their social ties are usually not well- established, their commitments are fewer and weaker, and the spirit of independence prevails. Concerning migration selectivity by sex, males have historically dominated migration streams in Africa. As ascertained by the present 77 Table 3.8. Percent distribution of age of rural outmigrants (Rural survey). Distribution Cumulative Age Group Percent Percent 10-19 years 31.9 31.9 20-24 years 26.4 58.3 25-34 years 25.8 84.1 35-44 years 10.8 94.9 45-54 years 3.7 98.6 55 and over 1.4 100.0 * The 276 outmigrants comprise those born in the sampled villages but reported by the rural respondents to have migrated from the sampled households to different Nigerian towns. survey a large proportion of the urban respondents, over 70 percent, are males. This large percentage of males among the migrants in Calabar should be interpreted with caution, for it reflects the higher degree of willingness by males to participate in the author's research. Nigeria is a male dominant society, where females still refer important deci- sions to the males. Even in this study many females referred the inter- viewer to the male members of their household. However, the rural survey data which contains no such bias, still reveals the predominance of males (58.7 percent) in the migration stream. 78 Marital Status Of the 78.4 recent migrants interviewed in Calabar city, 63.3 percent were single, 34.6 percent married, 1.9 percent widows, and only 0.3 percent divorced. The proportion of single migrants would be even greater if the number of married migrants who moved without other mem- bers of their families were added. Part of the reason for this predomi- nance of single migrants is that they are more flexible and capable of dealing with the difficult urban milieu such as high cost of food, rent and other housing problems. The large number of single migrants points out the magnitude of the urban housing needs; for most likely they will place greater strain on urban housing when they marry. Education The role of education in inducing rural-urban migration has re- ceived wide attention in African migration studies (Caldwell, 1969; Sabot, 1972; Rempel, 1970; Hurd, 1967:226-9; Imoagene, 1975:14; Callaway, 1967). Callaway estimates that three-quarters of the migrants to Ibadan in Nigeria are school-leavers. In their study of the Western region of Nigeria, Essang et a1. (1974) found education as an important factor in the rate of rural-urban migration. Rather than prepare people for their diverse occupations and lives, education in Nigeria has been largely about foreign ways of life or about aspects of life found only in towns. Education, is, therefore, looked upon as a passport to clerical and non- farm occupations which are identified with towns. Thus, in many aspects of his life, the educated Nigerian becomes a misfit in the rural setting. 79 Table 3.9 reveals the higher propensity to migrate of educated persons, especially in recent years. Though a majority of the migrants have moved to Calabar in the last ten years, the proportion of such recent migrants is higher (ranging from 86 percent to over 90 percent) among migrants with over six years of education than among illiterate migrants. The propensity to migrate of literate persons is steadily increasing over time as primary and secondary school-leavers come to form a higher total proportion of rural-urban migrants. When the proportions of rural and urban illiterates; that is, those with less than five years of formal education, are compared, it becomes obvious that migration is selective in terms of education. While 77.8 percent of rural respondents are illiterates, only 18.3 percent of urban respondents fall under this category (Table 3.10). Up to 46 per- cent of rural respondents, as compared to only 10 percent of urban respondents, have never been to school. This large proportion of illiterates in the rural population reflects migration selectivity by education. However, since a rela- tively large number of these illiterates are also moving to Calabar, this indicates that the effect of education is not the only driving force behind migration. Many forces, including poverty and the need for "civilization" push and/or pull migrants, and the uneducated, still move to town even though opportunities for higher paying jobs obviously favor those with educational qualifications. To test the effect of education on migration a correlation analy- sis of migration with education was run. The result showed no 80 Table 3.9. Percent distribution of years of education by years of migration (Urban survey). Recency of Years of Education Migration 0-5 6F10 511115 16 and over Recent 77.4 86.6 93. 93.8 Intermediate 14.6 9.7 5.8 4.2 01d 4.3 3.2 0.4 0.0 Very old 3.7 0.5 0.0 2.0 Total 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 (164) (403) (278) (50) Key: Recent = 0-10 years; Intermediate 11-20 years; Old = 21-30 years; Very Old = 31 years and over. Chi Square = 39.728 «igdf .0001 Sig. Table 3.10. Percent distribution of responses to the question: How many years of education have you? Rural Urban Years of Percent Cumfilative Percent Cumu1ative Education Distribution Percent Distribution Percent 0 46.3 46.3 9.7 9.7 1-5 31.5 77.8 8.5 18.2 6 and over 22.2 100.0 81.8 100.0 Chi ngare = 71.301 .2 df Sig, = .001 81 correlation (R = 0.1510--urban data). Though an analysis of the "very old" to "recent" migrants (Table 3.9) indicates an increasing propensity to migrate of literate persons over time, this lack of correlation be- tween migration and education reflects the existence of a large propor- tion of rural illiterates in the migrant stream. But with the introduc- tion of the Free Primary Education Program which went into effect in 1977 throughout Nigeria, the effect of education is likely to change. Unmatched, as the program is, with efforts to improve rural living con- ditions and re-orient education to also suit rural life, or increase and diversify rural job opportunities, not only will the future rate of rural-urban migration increase considerably but the effect of education will become more pronounced, as the proportion of rural illiterates is dramatically reduced. However, if properly planned the program should serve not only as a source of manpower for both farm and non-farm jobs but also as a means of regulating the spatial distribution of population. This observation will be discussed further in Chapter V. chgpation An important aspect of rural-urban migration in Calabar is the occupational contrast between village and town. In the village most people (63.7 percent) are farmers, while town occupations comprise a wide variety of jobs, with farming as an insignificant (1.8 percent) activity occupation (see Table 3.11). The larger proportion (49.9 percent) of urban as compared with 11.2 percent of rural activities under "other" in Table 3.11 means that urban occupations can be further deduced into many other categories of 82 Table 3.11. Urban and rural occupational distributions. Urban Rural Occupation N Percent N lPercent Civil servant 194 21.7 - - Trading 116 13.0 103 14.2 Teaching 37 4.1 20 2.8 Driving 30 3.4 - - Tailoring 26 2.9 19 2.6 Farming l6 1.8 462 63.7 Fishing 16 1.8 39 5.4 Nursing 11 1.2 - - Lawyer 3 0.3 - - Other 446 49.8 81 11.2 Total 895 100.0 725 100.0 Chi Square = 27.877 9 df Sig. = .001 workers such as doctors, builders, washermen, typists, printers, shoe repairers, etc. Clearly, while the paucity of opportunities push people from rural areas, because of the diversity of its occupational types the urban center attracts all types of rural people from all occupations. Ethnic Distribution Ethnic group is an essential element of African demography (Blanc, N.D.). As was discussed previously in this chapter, originally the ethnic composition of Calabar comprised only three groups, but due to the continuous influx of migrants, the number and distribution of its ethnic composition has considerably changed (Table 3.12). 83 Table 3.12. Ethnic distribution in Calabar. Percent Ethnic Group N Distribution 1. Ibibio/Annang 605 67.6 2. Efik/Qua/Efut 166 18.5 3. Ekoi/Ejagham/Etung 41 4.6 4. Oron 34 3.8 5. Other 49 5.5 Total 895 100.0 Today the Ibibio and Annang, from the mainland part of the Cross River State, constitute 67.6 percent, and form the majority of the ethnic groups in Calabar, pushing the original ethnic groups to a second place. The "other" ethnic groups, 5.5 percent, are migrants from other parts of Nigeria. It will be seen in the next section of this chapter, and in Chapter IV, that allegiance to one's ethnic origin and clan remains psychologically so strong that it is an important factor in the process of migration, and the search for urban housing. Migration Flows to Calabar The historical foundations of migration, the causal factors, and the characteristics of migrants, as discussed above, are essential for understanding the process and rate of rural-urban migration in Calabar. In addition, the size and spatial distribution of the population, with its elements of change, constitute the basic factors in migration flows. 84 Table 3.13 is an illustration of the State's projected rural and urban population change, as compared to that of Calabar Division. With a 5.4 percent annual growth rate, Calabar is the fastest growing urban area in the State, and this demonstrates its unrivalled attractive force. The lower rates of growth in the rural areas reflect the rural-urban migra- tion which is expected to continue in the future. Also, the larger proportion of rural population demonstrates the existence of a seemingly inexhaustible reserve of potential city dwellers in Calabar. At its current rate of 5.4 percent annual growth, the city may double its present population in less than 13 years. Table 3.13. Cross River State and Calabar divisional population distri- bution and projections--1975-1985. , I Annual Growth Area 1975 l 1985 Rate (Percent) Cross River State 3,837,592 4,896,122 2.5 Rural 3,341,078 4,176,762 2.3 Urban 496.514 719.360 3.8 Percent Urban 12.9 14.7 - Calabar Division 364,571 521,720 3.7 Rural 273,305 367,299 _3.0 Urban 1 91,266 154,471 5.4 I l Percent Urban 3 25.0 I 29.5 - Source: Berger (1975), p. 218. 85 It has already been noted that the establishment of Calabar as the capital is a factor in the city's resurgence. However, with the completion in 1977 of the direct highway connection (the Calabar- Itu road) to the Western part of Calabar, the desirability of the city as a commercial center is likely to increase. Another development likely to enhance the commercial function of Calabar is the proposed modernization of the part. These, and other innovations, will further accelerate the current rate of migration to this already "exploding" city. In the rural areas where rural-urban migration originates it is often hypothesized that population pressure on land is a major factor that pushes people to town. As was established in Chapter I, because of the low population density in rural Calabar, this hypothesis does not hold true in this study area. We, therefore, turn to the role of family size in rural-urban migration. In general, the propensity to migrate increases steadily with family size (Caldwell, 1968:371). Caldwell explains this as "the probable result of the interaction of two factors." That is, with the increasing number of siblings the chance that at least one will have chosen to migrate to town arises, and once some migration has occurred, the chance of others going is raised. To test the role of family size in migration flows from rural Calabar, it was hypothesized that there is a direct relationship between the size of household and the number of migrants from the family. A simple correlation coefficient of 0.4377 at the Significance level of 0.01 was revealed (urban data). This reflects the combination of many factors which operate to push or retain people in all levels of rural 86 homes. Family size is only one of the numerous factors in migration, but it is clearly important. The prior presence of relatives and friends in town is not only a factor in migration flows but is almost essential to the migrants' successful adjustment to town life. According to Hulton (1970) "migrants choice of destination is largely influenced by the presence of relatives and friends already in town." In this study migrants were asked: Who most influenced your principal reason for migrating to Calabar? Their responses reveal that relatives (48.2 cumulative percent), and especially parents in that group (20.1 percent), play a significant role in encour- aging migrants to move (Table 3.14). While 28.8 percent of the migrants moved to explore "unknown opportunities", 10.0 percent of them mentioned their educational background as the main influence behind their reason for migrating, and 9.4 percent were driven mainly by the Nigerian Civil War. Friends account for 3.8 percent of those who play a part in the migration decision process. In an attempt to assess the importance of relatives and friends in the successful adjustment of migrants to town life, migrants were asked: (1) With whom did you first stay upon arrival? (Table 3.15), and (2) How did you find your first job? (Table 3.16). On arrival, most migrants (60.9 percent) are likely to stay with close relatives. Some (26.5 percent) stay with friends, others (4.8 percent) with countrymen, and only 7.8 percent are able to stay on their own. Those who are able to stay on their own comprise largely civil servants, some company work- ers and a few private individuals who had secured jobs and prearranged accommodations prior to their arrival in Calabar. 87 Table 3.14. Percent distribution of responses to the question: Who most influenced your principal reason for migrating to Calabar? Percent Cumulative Responses N Distribution Percent Parents 158 20.1 20.1 Brother or sister 127 16.1 36.2 Other relatives 95 12.0 48.2 Personal exploration 227 28.8 77.0 Educational upbringing 79 _ 10.0 87.0 Friends 28 3.6 90.6 Other--main1y war 74 9.4 100.0 Total 788 [ 100.0 100.0 Table 3.15. Percent distribution of responses to the question: With whom did you first stay in this town on arrival (mention relationship)? Percent Responses N Distribution 1. Relative 492 60.9 2. Friend 214 26.5 3. Countryman 39 4.8 4. On my own 62 7.8 Total 808 100.0 88 Since economic factors play a major role in migration flows, it is important to find out how migrants manage to secure urban jobs. Apart from providing accommodations, relatives and friends help migrants in the search for jobs, especially at the initial stage (Table 3.16). However, friends do better than relatives in helping the migrant search for a job than in the provision of accommodation. This must occur since migrants feel freer to approach relatives rather than friends for hous— ing help. Table 3.16 indicates that some migrants still explore the urban job market all by themselves. Table 3.16. Percent distribution responses to the question: How did you find your first job? Percent Responses N Distribution 1. By myself 255 37.4 2. Through government 154 22.6 3. Friend 103 15.1 4. Relative 93 13.6 5. Employment agent 77 11.3 Total 682 100.0 The duration of migrants' stay with their urban hosts varies con- siderably-—ranging from a few months to ten or more years. Often some migrants are accommodated until they can find employment and are able to 89 pay for rent and food. In return for the free room and board, migrants render various domestic services such as house cleaning, laundry work, cooking, baby sitting, gardening, and where able, contribute money for board and rent. Considering the fact that high cost of living and rent are the outstanding problems of urban living in Calabar, it must be ob- served that the act of helping newly arrived migrants is never altogether a palatable service. However, by the norms of the extended family system, it is almost mandatory for relatives to provide these services to their peers in difficult situations. It will be interesting to see how long urban hosts will continue to assist their migrant relatives as cost of living continues to skyrocket and accommodations become scarcer. Another important factor in migration flows is the availability of information. The primary influence of urban relatives is likely to be in providing information on urban jobs (Byerlee, 1972:11). To assess the role of information in migration flows to Calabar, migrants were asked: Before deciding to move to Calabar did you have any information about a job? Only 43.5 percent of the respondents had any information about a job before they left home. In his book, Planning Without Facts, Stolper (1967) has clearly documented the importance but paucity of basic information in Nigeria. Table 3.17 is a distribution of the sources through which the respondents gained information about the urban job situation in Calabar. Again, urban friends (30.5 percent), more than family members (20.4 percent), serve as a major source of informa- tion. The other sources of information include newspaper, radio and others such as countrymen and rumors. 90 Table 3.17. Percent distribution of sources of information about job. Percent Sources N Distribution Friends 117 30.5 Newspaper 83 21.7 Relatives 78 20.4 Radio 50 13.1 Other 55 14.4 Total 383 100.0 One remarkable feature of migration flows is that many migrants follow a step migration pattern, first migrating to the nearest town and then to a larger urban area (Collins, 1952; Gregory, 1971). Discussion of this process can be traced back to the late 1800's when migration was first observed to proceed by stages (Ravenstein, 1895). In this research 50.7 percent of the respondents have lived in other towns before moving to Calabar, and the remainder had moved directly to the city. This rather large proportion of direct rural- urban movement can be explained as the result of kinship ties, develop- ment of highway networks in recent years, and the special attraction of this capital city. In order to appreciate the increasing magnitude of the problems arising from migration flows and the need to relate the process with economic development and human welfare, it is important to examine how 91 the volume of migration has changed through the years. The question about the number of years since migrants first moved to Calabar reveals that, on the average, they moved in the last six and a half years. This period of time coincides with the end of the Nigerian civil war and the change in status of Calabar which accelerated the movement of people to the city. Apart from those who directly moved into Calabar as war victims, many have decided to migrate into the city due to the rising expectations which marked the creation of the Cross River State during that war. The people of the State had, since the 19605, yearned for and struggled to have a separate State of their own. At last, its creation radically turned their attention away from Enugu as the seat of their government--the center of their hopes for civilization, modernization, social and economic progress, and focused it on Calabar. Though migration to Calabar is an old phenomenon, the sharp in- crease in its volume in recent years is a new experience. As Table 3.18 shows, only 1 percent of the migrants have over thirty years of resi- dency; whereas, 86 percent of them are recent migrants; that is, those who arrived less than ten years ago. It can be argued that return migrants have helped to reduce the proportion of the very old, old, and intermediate migrants. But as the rural survey indicates, only 10.6 percent of the interviewed households had any return migrants. One should, therefore, interpret with care the urban migrants' hopes to return permanently to their villages. Over 32 percent of them indicate that they will return to their village for good. Though this willingness to return underlines migrants' commitment, loyalty, and interest in their village homes, the realities of rural conditions mean 92 Table 3.18. Percent distribution of responses to the question: How many years since you first moved to Calabar? Percent Categories N Distribution Recent 679 85.9 Intermediate 81 10.3 Old 21 2.7 Very old 9 1.1 Total 790 100.0 that only very few of them will fultill their ambitions of a permanent return. Of course, to most of them, such a return will be largely con- tingent upon the materialization of their expressed reasons for planning to return (Table 3.19). As Table 3.19 shows, 32.3 percent of the migrants base their hopes of a permanent return on the eventual availability of a rural job oppor- tunity, and only 7.9 percent base it on retirement from their urban job. Preference for village life is the second in importance of the reasons for permanent return; it reflects the degree of rural-urban interaction that could very likely become the number one reason. Temporary visits serve to link the urban and rural areas. Though only few migrants in the urban area return permanently to their village homes, the volume of temporary visits is quite large. 0n the whole, of course, there is a net migration flow from rural to urban areas. 93 Table 3.19. Percent distribution responses to the question: Will you ever permanently return to your village? If yes, why? Percent Responses N Distribution 1. Whenever opportunity offers itself in the village 217 32.4 2. Preference for village life 153 22.8 3. After completing my building in the village 91 13.6 4. Lack of success in town 87 13.0 5. After making enough money in town 69. 10.3 6. On retirement 53 ' 7.9 Total 670 100.0 Rural-Urban Linkages Rural-urban migration involves "spatial interaction processes" (Soja, 1969:284). That is, migration can be viewed as the ways in which space is organized and articulated through the circulation of people, goods, and ideas. According to Gould (1969:281) "The rural areas are tied over more tightly to the urban nodes as people, goods and messages flow and grow recursively to feed back information through geographic space". Evidently, in Calabar, the migration process is not a "one shot" operation; for it does not necessarily mean a permanent separation between those who have moved and their rural kin and environment. 94 Rather, even if firmly established in town, the migrant from the rural area retains very close ties with the rural area through visits to his village. The situation is not far different from what Little (1965:21) described as "constant coming and going of traders, as well as the move- ment of migrants ... town people frequently visit or are visited by rural relatives." Besides, as another observer indicates: "It appears that the level of interaction and movement between rural and urban areas is higher in Africa and Asia than in Latin America" (Ross, 1973:43). Calabar Division is unique in the high level of interaction be- tween the rural and urban areas. Traditionally, the Efik of Calabar have always claimed that, irrespective of the spatial location of their homes in the Division, they belong to both the rural and the urban areas. There is an Efik saying: "mutoho inwang utoho Efik", which means, if you do not hail from the rural plantation you are not a true Efik. It there- fore implies that practically all the larger Efik settlements have some blood links with the vast cultivable lands (inwang) north, east and south- east of Calabar city and Creek Town. Almost every Efik family in Calabar is connected with its "inwang", the source of its economic strength; and the origin of these connections is "buried deep in Calabar history" (Aye, 1967). After the slave trade "inwang" became a place of economic secur- ity and freedom from political and social molestations of the town. Consequently, most rural migrants of Efik origin resist the idea of being "branded" migrants in Calabar. In answer to questions about migra- tion control, they retorted: ."How can anybody ever restrict one's free- dom of choice to visit or live in either one's rural or urban home?" 95 Today a vast majority of migrants in Calabar identify themselves with their rural families through periodic visits. Migrants visit home frequently, especially during holidays such as Christmas and Easter, special ceremonial occasions, family and village events, and during annual leave (see Table 3.20). Over 90 percent of the respondents indi- cate that migrants in towns visit their rural homes at least once a year. Over 30 percent of the migrants visit village homes as often as once every month; whereas, only 5.7 percent of the urban, and 6.6 per- cent of the rural respondents indicate migrants that never visit village homes. Table 3.20. Percent distribution of responses to the questions: How often do you visit your village home? (Urban survey) How often do members of your household who live in town visit home? (Rural survey) Urban Survey Rural Survey Relative CumulatiVe elative CumulatiVe Responses .N Percent Percent N Percent Percent Monthly 284 35.1 35.1 98 38.0 38.0 Twice a year 336 41.6 76.7 126 48.8 86.8 Once a year 142 17.6 94.3 17 6.6 93.4 Never 46 5.7 100.0 . 17 6.6 100.0 Total 1808 100.0 100.0 I 258% 100.0 1 100.0 Further investigations reveal that incidence of home visits var- ies with factors such as age--the major variable of migration. The older 96 migrants with no surviving parents or close relatives are less mobile and are more tied to their present residence by their family responsi- bilities than the younger ones. Those who migrated from rural areas because of family quarrels or what they called "rural hatred" scarcely visit home or plan to return to the village. Some respondents also hinted that "one cannot expect migrants who moved because of criminal offences to ever show up in their villages." Among migrants who rarely visit, or have broken contact with their village homes, can be added the unemployed or unsuccessful migrants--those who have nothing to show as a sign of their achievements in town. Migrants in this group, are general- ly those who scarcely send money or other gift items to their rural families. An important aspect of rural-urban linkages is the flow of money and gifts from urban to rural areas (see Table 3.21). In economic terms, remittance of money and other items of gift is often considered as the most important aspect of rural-urban migration (Caldwell, 1968). Urban- rural remittances in Calabar include not only money but items such as clothing, trinkets, watches and other imported goods; whereas, rural- urban remittances are largely food items. Because only money flows are easy to measure, migrants were asked if they send money home, and 70 per- cent answered yes. They spend an average of $187, ranging from $8 to $1527 to rural homes. Table 3.21 is a distribution of financial remit- tances by migrants in Calabar. A large proportion of the respondents (over 80 percent) send less than $305 to relatives in rural areas. The low average amount of remittances from migrants indicate that when the cost of educating migrants as well as the inestimable counter-flow of 97 gifts from rural areas is considered, the impact of out-migration can be viewed as a net loss, in both physical and financial terms, to rural areas . Table 3.21. Percent distribution of responses to the question: How much money do you send to your family in the village annually? Categories of amount Percent Percent (in US dollars) N Respondents Cumulative 0-152 268 57.8 57.8 154-304 118 25.6 83.4 306-458 44 9.3 92.7 460—610 19 4.1 96.8 613-764 9 1.9 98.7 766 and over 6 1.3 100.0 Total 464 100.0 . 100.0 Summary Observations in this chapter demonstrate that the dynamic histori- cal development of Calabar is important in understanding the process of migration in this study area. In its development, this ancient city has passed through various stages which affect the aspirations of its people and, consequently, the volume and direction of migration flows. Originally, internal wars pushed people into the city, but today the overriding forces in migration flows to the city are economic, and employment provides the major lure to Calabar. 98 Pulls and pushes operate in both rural and urban areas. But to many migrants and nonmigrants the sharp contrast between the dearth of economic as well as social facilities in the villages, and their pres- ence in the town, is obvious. Added to this rural-urban imbalance has been the change in political status of Calabar. These and other factors have led to a remarkable increase in the volume of migration flow, as well as changes in the ethnic and socio-economic make-up of the migrants, especially since the last Nigerian Civil War. To most of these migrants "home is sweet home", and though their remittances have no net benefit to rural development, town dwellers' loyalties are to their village places of birth rather than to the town where they earn a living. The close ties which migrants maintain between the city and their villages mean that instead of being confined to the city , ideas and practices are diffused over a much wider area, thus making the city "a pace setter for the society" (Little, 1965). These observations are critical in both rural and urban planning policies. Ironically the Civil War led to the destruction of many houses in Calabar. But its end marked the resurgence of the city. We now turn to the impact of migration, which has been dramatic since that War, on housing in Calabar. CHAPTER IV THE IMPACT OF MIGRATION ON HOUSING Introduction The people of old Calabar showed early interest in "modern" European buildings. Their rulers asked for the erection of "solid" type of buildings to replace their mud and wattle houses. As far back as 1785 some of the chiefs possessed European built storey houses. Nearly all of these were prefabricated in Britain and shipped to Calabar. Notable among such buildings are those of the old Consulate now used as the State Governor's Residence, the Old Residency, and the Chief Justice's Residence. However, during the Civil War of 1966-9 some 80,500 residential buildings were destroyed in the Cross River State; Calabar suffering the heaviest toll. In Nigeria as a whole, adequate and appropriate shelter has be- come a primary problem especially in the rapidly urbanizing areas, and Calabar is no exception. As a result, "no ready-made accommodation awaits those who come into these urban areas" (Sabowale, 1977). Thus, before migration, and on arrival in town, the primary concern of the migrant is often where he will live. The search for housing, therefore, presents a greater challenge to migrants on arrival than the search for jobs. In this study, about 60 percent of the respondents indicate 99 100 that finding an accommodation, rather than a job, was their number one problem on arrival. More to the point, rural-urban migration is a persistent cause of the urban housing deficit. Many authors and researchers support the view that it is largely the influx of rural migrants that aggravates urban housing problems (Harvey, 1968; Asika, 1974; Inoyo, 1974; Ebong, 1975; Honsby-Odi, 1975:7; Achunine, 1977:3; Grimes, 1976:91). Grimes' remark is instructive: SOME HIGH-INCOME COUNTRIES have found housing--and more generally urban development--difficu1t to organize efficiently and equitably, even though they have not had to deal with the same explosive city growth as developing countries. It is therefore not surprising that most developing countries, with low incomes and limited resources, find housing a nearly intractable policy area (1976:91). Because rural-urban migration and its impact on urban and rural housing constitute a threat on the human, social, and economic wellbeing of the Calabar environment, this chapter will analyze these features as a means of establishing a framework for policy recommendations on migra- tion and housing. Migration and Impact on Housing A Scheme of the Impact of Rural-Urban Migration on Urban Housing The intricate nature of the impact of rural-urban migration on housing is best portrayed in model farm (Figure 4.1). No matter where he resides, every individual is influenced by the environment where he lives. The degree of such influence is dependent upon the individual's personal characteristics. In this model, the rural environment is _te mgamwm ..o;.=< ”muczom _ x259. $032.5“ 3 — 3.3.0:. 8.3.2.3. can... _ 3.0... .383... .53.: .2229. 101 3.35.2130 0.3.! 25.92 .050 a 255-595 .0 oE:_o> . :1... R 8:233. 93800 a 302 .... 3.8.3. 1. ... 9.5.5: :35 ”5.80:...“ 938: 3 06.33.2853. .. sunk-“HUM... 2.3.0.2 0.0.92 5.3.92 0.3.03.5 hzmiom$zu 2...... air... 35¢ eIII 0. 1L .0 on...) o : 3:”...8zwu +11 .mc9.30m..o..&£...~ .o 9:30) 8.230 3:350 ..aws...:oo.uom ..dmam 8.385.335 . .2328 92.. 1.01% z o :23. ozaao: 2.5% 526: =35 : Facet—.803“. 05mm— B 7.2.55.5 8a;— 3.3.2216 9. «.8300... 4 w «3.3.2.3836 7.31438 3.55:0 235385... a q . a; 2 Eu 2025 G mung—93m 30:30 0.035 «05.3.. 9.3:... 2.0.5.330 as“. 35.21.. .m. 02530: 20 ZO_._.... .o .26... — 30526.9... .05: ...»:uc. ..oucogmd .363. ... 33.2.. toucozcw 0...)... l\ .23. e. 8.... hzm§¢04w>mo .ozzozoom 02....020ma QZ< 20:.