.;,»«1x-~11'~ 1:111 11 m 1111111111111111111111111111111'1{111111111111111111111111 1.,|‘1"‘1‘ 1 11111111111111: 111 211 11 11111 111111 11111 1111 1 11 1‘ 1.11.1111, 1. .111 3111 11 11 11 . .. ~ 1.1 111 1: 11111111111 111111-11 11111111111111 11111111| 11111 11.111111111111111 111111 1 . 11111 ::. -- .— ““h— -—-——_..~ . ---—-—_‘—— .—.——.— —:\_—— .— 1 —— _. “.4... __-,——_h.___—__;_.__._. WW “hp—hm W_ flan—'— ”a m... ~ v—M -\ W “in. “£17.; M~ M W w > 1 1111 11111111111111 1111111 ‘111 111111111111 11111 111 1 '1 .111 11111 11 1111111111111111 111 111'! . '1 11111 1111111 111111 11111111111111111111111111 1111111 11 1 111 1 . 11111111111 11:1 11111 111 1111 11111111111111 11 111 1111111111111 1 1.1.1.1111. 111 1111111111111111111111 1 11' 1111 111 11 '1 11 1 ‘ 11111 11111111 111.1.” 1 1 r1 11 1111‘111111 111 1111 11111 11 11:11.11 111111111111 11111 . 1 1 1.: :1 1111111111111 ._- 1 1 1' 11' 11111111 1111111 1 11 1 11 11 '1: 111 11111111 1111111 11111111111 . 1 11 1 1111 1. 11111 111411111211 :11“ 1" 1111111111 111111111111; E :" 1 " 1111111111111 111111 1111 11111 11111 '111 1'1 1 1 1:111 \\\\l\\\\\\\\\\\\l\\\\\l l \\\\\\\\\\\\\ \WLsJ 10%)63 3829 f y," LIBRARY Michigan State University THC.” This is to certify that the thesis entitled MOLECULAR DYNAMICS OF A LIQUID CRYSTAL THROUGH BAND SHAPE ANALYSIS; A STUDY OF 4-CYANO-4'-PENTYLBIPHENYL (SCB) WITH A COMPUTERIZED RAMAN SPECTROMETER presented by Stephen Michael Gregory has been accepted towards fulfillment of the requirements for Ph. D . degree in ChemistrL git/5g, .2 I Major professor Date August 24, 1979 0-7639 OVERDUE FINES ARE 25¢ PER DAY . PER ITEM Return to book drop to remove this checkout from your record. MOLECULAR DYNAMICS OF A LIQUID CRYSTAL THROUGH BAND SHAPE ANALYSIS; A STUDY OF 4-CYANO-4'-PENTYLBIPHENYL (SCB) WITH A COMPUTERIZED RAMAN SPECTROMETER BY Stephen Michael Gregory A DISSERTATION Submitted to Michigan State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Department of Chemistry 1979 ABSTRACT MOLECULAR DYNAMICS OF A LIQUID CRYSTAL THROUGH BAND SHAPE ANALYSIS; A STUDY OF 4-CYANO-4'- PENTYLBIPHENYL (SCB) WITH A COMPUTERIZED RAMAN SPECTROMETER 3)» Stephen Michael Gregory This work was undertaken to understand more about the nature of liquids and the forces that hold liquid molecules together. The type of liquid system that was chosen for this study was a nematic liquid crystal system. The system was probed by Raman spectroscopy and viscosity measurements. The nematic liquid crystal system that was the most fruitful was 4-cyano-4'-pentylbiphenyl (SCB). The Raman spectrometer used in this work was computerized for the project and software was written for both a minicomputer and a large computer to analyze the data. SCB was synthesized from 4-bromobiphenyl for the experiments. The Raman lineshape analysis of SCB was not very conclusive due to experimental difficulties. The viscosity measurements were converted to reorientational relaxation times by use of several modified Stokes- Einstein equations. These results covered a range of one magnitude around 1 x 10-10 seconds. The analysis indicated that sticking boundary conditions with a microviscosity correction came the closest to the Raman lineshape results, but there was a one order of magnitude difference, with the Raman results being the shortest. To Joyce ii II. III. IV. VI. VII. VIII. TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES . . . LIST OF FIGURES . . . . INTRODUCTION . . . . . . LIQUID CRYSTAL SYSTEMS . THEORETICAL EXPERIMENTAL . INSTRUMENTAL . LINESHAPE ANALYSIS OF SIMPLE LIQUIDS . LIFETIME STUDY OF LIQUID CRYSTAL SYSTEMS . CONCLUSIONS APPENDIX A. PROGRAM DATCOL APPENDIX B. PROGRAM MOVE APPENDIX C. PROGRAM CRUNCH APPENDIX D. PROGRAM LNSHP . APPENDIX E. TEST ROUTINE LIST OF REFERENCES . iii iv 22 34 54 62 95 98 , 109 , 113 . 138 . 148 . 150 TABLE 1. TABLE 2. TABLE 3. LIST OF TABLES DENSITY 0F 4-CYANO-4'«PENTYLBIPHENYL . . . . . . . . . . 89 EXPERIMENTAL AND CALCULATED vrscosrrrss or 4-CYANO-4'-PENTYLBIPHENYL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 89 VISCOSITIES, EFFECTIVE MOLECULAR VOLUMES, AND RELAXATION TIMES FOR 4-CYANO-4'-PENTYLBIPHENYL . . . . . 91 iv FIGURE FIGURE FIGURE FIGURE FIGURE FIGURE FIGURE FIGURE FIGURE FIGURE FIGURE FIGURE FIGURE FIGURE FIGURE FIGURE FIGURE 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. LIST OF FIGURES A BLOCK DIAGRAM OF THE LASER RAMAN SYSTEM USED FOR THIS WORK . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . THE GLASS RAMAN CELL USED FOR SIMPLE LIQUIDS THE COPPER CUVETTE HOLDER USED FOR RAMAN EXPERIMENTS RUN AT TEMPERATURES AROUND 25°C . . . . THE COPPER CUVETTE HOLDER USED FOR RAMAN EXPERIMENTS RUN AT TEMPERATURES AROUND 100°C THE OVERALL SCHEMATIC OF THE INTERFACE BETWEEN A PDP 8/I MINICOMPUTER AND A JARRELL-ASH RAMAN SPECTROMETER . . . . . . . . . . . A FLOWCHART OF PROGRAM DATCOL.SV. A FLOWCHART OF PROGRAM MOVE.SV. A FLOWCHART OF PROGRAM CRUNCH.SV. A FLOWCHART OF PROGRAM LNSHP. SURVEY SCAN OF THE RAMAN SPECTRUM OF ACETONITRILE . THE 2250 cm.1 VIBRATIONAL BAND OF ACETONITRILE, USED AS INPUT TO PROGRAM LNSHP. . . . . THE OUTPUT OF PROGRAM LNSHP FOR THE 2250 cm-1 VIBRATIONAL BAND OF ACETONITRILE STRUCTURES OF EBB, SCB, AND MBBA ISOTROPIC PHASE SURVEY RAMAN SPECTRA OF MBBA. TOP: (45°C); BOTTOM: NEMATIC PHASE (25°C) SURVEY RAMAN SPECTRA OF SCB. BOTTOM: SOLID PHASE (15°C); CENTER: NEMATIC PHASE (25°C); TOP: ISOTROPIC LIQUID PHASE (45°C) . . . 2225 cm"1 SCATTERING FOR SCB IN THE NEMATIC PHASE (25°C) . . . . . . . . 2225 cm'1 SCATTERING FOR SCB IN THE ISOTROPIC PHASE (45°C) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 26 29 31 36 39 44 47 51 56 58 60 65 67 71 73 75 FIGURE 18. FIGURE 19. FIGURE 20. FIGURE 21. FIGURE 22. INSTRUMENT FUNCTION FOR THE JARRELL-ASH SPECTROMETER; Ar LASER PLASMA LINE AT 4880 A . . . . l LINESHAPE FIT FOR THE 2225 cm“ RAMAN BAND OF SCB IN THE ISOTROPIC PHASE (45°C) LINESHAPE FIT FOR THE 2225 cm"1 IN THE NEMATIC PHASE (25°C) I 0. Q RAMAN BAND OF SCB VIBRATIONAL LINESHAPE FIT TO THE 2225 cm.1 RAMAN BAND OF SCB IN THE ISOTROPIC PHASE (45°C) VIBRATIONAL LINESHAPE FIT TO THE 2225 cm“ OF SCB IN THE NEMATIC PHASE (25°C) vi 1 RAMAN BAND 78 80 82 85 87 I. INTRODUCTION In order to understand the nature of liquids and the forces that hold liquid molecules together one must find a suitable probe into the interactions within the liquid state. This work deals with the selec- tion of such a probe and the determination of its efficacy in answering some of the questions raised by theory and other experiments. The probe chosen for this work was Raman spectroscopy. The line- shape contribution to a vibrational Raman band from molecular rotations can be separated out and measured.1 The functional form used to repro- duce the rotational (or reorientational) contribution to the overall bondshape can possibly shed some light on the liquid state being studied. One such mathematical model is a Lorentzian function, which corresponds to random rotational behavior and has a half-width that is related to the rotational correlation time (the l/e decay time). If rotation in the liquid under study is not random then some other func- tional form will better fit the experimental data. One question this work has attempted to address is what happens to the rotational motion, and also to the rotational bandshape, when a liquid passes from an isotropic State to an anisotropic state? Nematic liquid crystals were chosen as prototypic systems. The theoretical development for such a system suggests that the true rotational reorien- tation function will be a sum of Lorentzians, which would not necessarily be matchable with a single Lorentzian.2 The liquid crystal that proved to be the most fruitful, and was therefore studied in most detail, was 4-cyano-4'-pentylbiphenyl (SCB). Its reorientational time, as determined from the shape of the C E N stretching mode, was found to be very slow; in fact, it was so slow that a distinction between single or multiple Lorentzian lineshapes could not be drawn within the experimental error. However, there do appear to be significant differences between the bandshapes in the isotropic and nematic phases. The data obtained were good enough to show that this system behaves like others of similar size3 and that its overall correlation function is dominated by vibrational relaxation on a short time scale (<5 psec). The same experiment from which data for the rotational lineshape calculations is collected also provides sufficient data for calculation of the vibrational lineshape. From the vibrational lineshape for each liquid phase the vibrational correlation times were calculated and found to be consistant with studies of other liquid crystals. In order to obtain information about flow characteristics, the temperature dependence of the apparent flow viscosity of SCB was determined and reorientational times were calculated using the Stokes-Einstein equation with a variety of boundary conditions. Because Raman intensity data are difficult to measure precisely, and because good data are required at closely spaced intervals well into the wings of a Raman band, traditional strip-chart recording of a Raman spectrum was not feasible for these studies. Therefore, as part of this dissertation research, an interface between a minicomputer and a Raman instrument was designed and constructed. This interface will be described, as will the software and the Operating parameters which must be defined for efficient utilization of the computerized Raman spectrophotometer. II. LIQUID CRYSTAL SYSTEMS Liquid crystals have been studied since the middle of the 19th century. Most of the early work was devoted to describing the liquid systems; it was not until the 1920's that a quantitative theory for liquid crystals was presented. It was also during that period that the first works on the viscosity behavior of liquid crystals were presented.4 Liquid crystals can be divided into two categories: thermotropic and lyotropic. Lyotropic liquid crystals are prepared by mixing two or more components, one of which generally has polar molecules. These systems can exhibit many structures, with one of the most common systems being a lipid-water system. Thermotropic liquid crystals are prepared by heating certain organic or organometallic compounds. The two classes of thermotropic liquid crystals are called smectic (from the Greek word meaning grease or slime) and nematic (from the Greek word meaning thread).s In a smectic liquid crystal the molecules are arranged in layers with their long axes parallel to each other. The molecules can move in two directions in the plane, and they can rotate about one axis. Within the layers they can be arranged either in neat rows or randomly distri- buted. The layers can slide, without much hindrance, over neighboring layers. In a nematic liquid crystal the only structural restriction is that the molecules maintain a parallel or nearly parallel arrangement to one another. The molecules are mobile in three directions and can rotate freely about one axis. This molecular arrangement can be compared to a long box of pencils where the pencils can roll and slide back and forth, but they remain parallel to one another in the direction of their long axes. Liquid crystals also exhibit an isotropic liquid State. There is a well defined transition point as these compounds pass from a liquid crystalline state to an isotropic liquid state. The temeprature at this point is denoted TC and it is called the clearing point, since all cloudiness in the liquid vanishes. There can also be transitions between different liquid crystalline states,such as from a smectic state to a nematic state. Molecular structure plays an important role in the liquid crystal— line states that a molecule exhibits. Small alterations in the structure will sometimes greatly affect the properties of the liquid crystal compound.6 Changes that increase lateral separation and decrease lateral attractions tend to decrease the thermal stabilities of liquid crystalline states. If the change increases the polarity and/or polarizability of the molecule, then the thermal stability will be increased. Modification of the alkyl tail length on liquid crystalline molecules has two opposing effects. The longer molecules are less readily rotated out of the ordered states and their overall polariza- bility is increased. These two factors will increase the thermal stability of the system. On the other hand, the aromatic centers are further apart, and this tends to result in a decrease in thermal stability. Many theories have been proposed that try to describe the various liquid crystalline states; some of them will be briefly discussed here.7"14 Ericksen7 suggests a continuum theory that describes the macroscopic behavior of nematic liquid crystals, and has used this theory to investigate the propagation of orientation waves and viscosity. In this model, the nematic fluids are considered to be incompressible and thermal effects are ignored. It was found that associated with any discontinuity in orientation there is a discontinuity in motion, which promotes dissipation of the orientation wave. The continuum theory predicts that the fluid will behave as a Newtonian fluid at high shear rates. If the shear rate is low, then there will be some small differences in the normal stress. These stress effects should be similar to those found in polymer solutions. Franklin8 has modified Kirkwood's diffusion theory to take into account anisotropic viscosity, molecular order, and the detailed geometry of the molecules. This theory adopts the assumption that the molecules are rigid rods, and predicts a Stokes-Einstein like behavior for the relationship between the rotational diffusion of a liquid crystal and its viscosity. It also predicts a temperature dependence of the broadening of Rayleigh peaks. Wadati and Isihara9 present a theory based on cluster expansions for a non-uniform system. They obtained good success in predicting phase transitions of rod—like molecules in two dimensions. They predict that the mechanism for the nematic-smectic phase transition is the same as that for hard-sphere particles. Freedlo has looked at a stochastic-molecular theory for spin relaxation of liquid crystals. He has shown that the statistical independence between the overall molecular reorientational motion and the order fluctuations can be removed. Cotter11-14 has developed a theory in which the short range inter- molecular repulsions are represented by repulsions between hard sphero— ' cylinders and the intermolecular attractions are treated self-consistently in the mean field approximation. This attraction tends to align the molecular axes in space and provides a uniform background potential. This model suggests that short range anisotropic intermolecular repulsions play a major role in stabilizing nematic mesophases. Raman spectroscopy has been used to delve into the molecular structure and forces that Characterize liquid crystal systems. Schnur15 noticed new Raman bands that changed as the liquid crystal phase changes for alkoxyazobenzens. These low frequency bands were attributed to an accordian mode of the alkyl tail of the molecules under study. The temperature dependence of these bands indicate that a greater number of conformations of the tail are allowed as the order of the fluid decreases. Priestley and Pershunl6 and Jen et al.17 have developed a formalism by which the order parameter of a nematic liquid crystal can be obtained using depolarization ratios of Raman bands. The technique used has shown promise for being able to study the internal structure of various smectic phases, since the limitations are how well the incident beam can be focused and how selectively the scattered light can be collected. A good discussion of the vibrational spectroscopy of liquid crystals has been presented by Bullkin.18 He has noticed pretransitional effects in both the infrared and Raman spectra of nematic liquid crystals. The indication is a "softening" of a mode that arises from a hindered rotation or translation of the system. Calculations made on these modes have shown that there exists strong coupling among the modes along certain axes, while much weaker coupling exists along others. Gray and Mosley19 have looked at the Raman spectra of 5C3 and SCB-d They assigned the observed Raman bands to various vibrational ll' modes of the molecules. They also explained some of the frequency shifts and intensity changes observed upon transition from one phase to another. Most of these changes were due to a freeing of translational and rotational modes. Many investigators have studied the viscosity of liquid crystals.20-34 Fisher and FredricksonzO investigated the effect of interfacial orienta- tion on the viscosity of p-azoxyanisole. They found that if the molecules were oriented perpendicular to the walls of a capillary tube there was a much more pronounced non-Newtonian behavior of the viscosity than if the molecules were parallel to the walls. Martinoty and Candau21 studied the viscosity coefficients using shear wave reflectance equations. Gahwiller22 determined five independent viscosity coefficients using a combination of the flow velocity and changes in birefringence induced by laminar flow in a magnetic field. Wahl and Fisher23 looked at shear flow using rotating glass plates. With this method they were able to obtain elastic and viscosity constants of N-(p-methoxybenzylidene)-p- butylamine (MBBA). Brochard24 studied the effect of rotation of the molecular axis on some effective viscosity coefficients. He was also able to determine some of the Leslie coefficients using this technique. Gruler and Meier25 determined the splay and bend constants of a series of 4,4'-di{n-alkoxy)- azoxybenzenes by means of changes in birefringence of parallel oriented samples in a magnetic field. Porter et al.26 studied the viscosity of blends of cholesteryl acetate and myristate. These studies showed that the viscosity was Newtonian in the isotropic phase, but non-Newtonian in the cholesteric and smectic phases. DeGennes27 calculated the effect of shear flows on critical fluctuations in fluids. Kim et 31.28 measured the anisotropic shear viscosity in CBOOA. They found that if the molecules are aligned parallel to the walls, the smectic phase showed nearly Newtonian flow, and the temperature dependence had an Arrhenius behavior. Karat and Madhusudanazg"31 looked at the elastic properties of a series of 4'-n-Alkyl-4-Cyanobiphenyls. The constants showed the odd- even effect. Bata et al.32 obtained rotary motion of liquid crystal molecules about their short axes from splay viscosity measurements. The relaxation time showed a Stokes-Einstein type of behavior. Kawamura and Iwayanagi33 Obtained a complex shear viscosity in the isotropic and nematic phases of nematic liquid crystals. They noticed Newtonian behavior in both phases. White et a1.34 measured the apparent viscosity of MBBA, hexyloxybenzylidene amino benzonitrile (HBAB), and cyanobenzylidene octyloxyaniline (CBOOA). They showed that the measured viscosities fit all the standard relations. A good review of the physical properties of liquid crystals can be found in a book written by DeGennes.35 III. THEORETICAL In describing the expected shape of a Raman band one must start from the basic equation that describes the transition between energy levels, taken from the Schrodinger picture of a molecular transition. In the Schrodinger viewpoint, the intensity of a Raman band can be . . . . . 36 written u51ng the polarization formula for non-resonant Raman scattering: . I V S 2 S I I(w) = 2p.z|<:|e - a - e |f>| 6(w -w + m + w ~ w.), (1) . 1 L L . v f 1 1 f - where i and f correspond to the initial and final rotation-tranSlation_ states of the molecule, respectively. The m's are the frequencies of the radiation, with: OI the frequency of the incident photon, ms the scattered frequency, and wv’ w , and mi corresponding to the energies f of the vibration, the final state, and the initial state, respectively. The polarization is given by av, and f1 and ES are the incident and a scattered unit, polarized, electric vectors, respectively. To convert to the Heisenberg picture the first assumption that is made is that the sample is in thermal equilibrium before each photon is scattered, so that -n .5 pi = e i/kT/Ze “i/kT. (2) i The delta function in Equation 1 is expressed as a Fourier integral with the form on _ t 5(m) = (1/2n) f elfl’dt (3) 10 Using Equation 3, Equation 1 becomes ' S I(w) = (1/2n)£piX < iIEI . a“ - e |£> i f a : ~ ~ 9 r m i(wS-w1+w )t iw t —iw t x f e v e f e 1 dt' (4) -m The next step in the transformation is to express the rotation- translation energies as eigenvalues of the Hamiltonian, H, acting on the states |i> and ]f>, and to sum over the complete set of final states. Equation 4 becomes 1(w) = (1/2")Zoiz 7 ei(wS-w1+wv)tdt =(1/2fl) 7 dte-imtgpi, (5) where w = w1 - ms - wv and is the displacement from the center of the Raman band. Equation 5 can be simplified by using the solution to the Heisenberg equation of motion daldt = i(H,a]/fi, (6) which upon integration with respect to time yields - A E - . A elflt/ a(o)e lHt/fi. ~ 9(t) = (7) 11 Substituting Equation 7 into Equation 5 yields v(t) . 85 > e-lwtdt. (8) ~ . I(w) = (1/2n) I < [81 o av(0) . ES][€I . I: Q If the sample is isotropic, Equation 8 can be simplified to I(w) = (1/2w) f(1/3) < av(0) av(t) > e-iwt dt. (9) The factor of 1/3 can be omitted by normalizing the intensity. To obtain an expression for the time correlation function, the inverse Fourier transform is taken of Equation 9, and the correlation function can be written as ¢(t) = < aV(t) av(0) > = f I(m)eiwtdw. (10) ~ - The polarizability taken into account has been the total polarizability of the sample. If this is transformed to the polarizability of individual molecules, the correlation function becomes, when looking at one component: D (t) = z < aA (t)aB (O) > (11) jk B jk jk , where the superscripts A and B label the molecules of the system. Equation 11 can be simplified by expanding Ojk(t) in a Taylor series in powers of the normal coordinate qv(t),37 _ o + v v + ajk(t) - ajk(t) iajk(t)q (t) . . . , (12) where O;k(t) = dajk(t)/dqv(t)[qv = 0. Substituting Equation 12 into Equation 11 and keeping terms to first order only, the correlation function can be written as 12 _ 0A OB vA vB ¢jk(t) "' :[ + i < ajk(t)ajk(0)> X). (13) where the assumption is made that the internal vibrations are not coupled to the orientation of the molecule, and thus the cross terms can be neglected. The correlation function can be split up into terms that depend only on molecule A, a "self" part, and into terms that depend on the interaction between A and B, a "distinct" part.38 When this is done the correlation function becomes Ojk(t) = :82 < a?k(t)o?k(0)>. (14) #A The assumption is now made that the phases of vibrations in different molecules are random, that is, qvA(t)qu(O) = 0. Using this assumption and combining Equations 13 and 14, the correlation function can be written as Ojk(t) = + B:A< a?:(t)agi(0)> + z , (15) V where the three terms are the single-particle Ragleigh, cooperative Rayleigh, and single-particle Raman scattering, respectively. Any of the three terms in Equation 15 can be used to extract reorientational information from a lineshape measurement Of the sample in question. Since the Raman scattering arises from normal vibrational 13 modes of the molecule, it can be used to probe how different vibrational modes reorient, and thus, by careful selection of the mode, the reorientation about the different molecular axes can be sampled. Therefore, the single-particle Raman scattering term of Equation 15 will be analyzed. The superscripts denoting the molecule will be dropped since it is a single—particle process. The terms ng can be separated into an isotropic part and an anisotropic part. The two parts are, respectively, v v a = (1/3) Iajj’ J v = v _ v Bjk ajk a Ojk. (16) Since the anisotropic part does not commute with the rotational kinetic 39 . . . . . . . energy, it is this part that contains the rotational information. Thus the orientational component of the spectrum is:38 OR _ w v v -imt Ijk - f < sjk(A)ejk(0)>e dt, (17) .00 where the intrinsic width has been neglected. In order to extract reorientational information from Equation 17,, the form of must be determined. Viewed in the molecular frame of reference the B; 's are constants that are dependent only on the k . . . . 8 structure of the molecule. Written in spherical notation, they become:3 v _ 1/2 v 80 - ((6) /2)szz, 3:1 = (Imus;z - 13:2). 8:2 = (1/2)(8:x - B;y):is:y. (l8) 14 The molecular frame is different from the laboratory frame and the relation between the two can be described by a rotation in terms of Eulerian angles, O(a,8,y).4o The transformation from the molecular frame to the laboratory frame can be performed by38 2 (2) v 2 Dnm (Q)Bm(MF), (19) V B (O) = ,n m=_2 where D£:)(O) is the Wigner rotation matrix of the second order and is described by41 i"“e‘inYM-lfinjm):(j+n)!(j-m)!(Haul/2 j = - Dnm(n) e S XIS!(j'S'H)!(j+m-S)!(n+s-m)l]-1[cos(B/2)]2j+m-n~25 ]h-m+Zs X[-sin(B/2) , (20) with the sum over 5 Starting where all the factorials in the denominator are positive. The B;(MF)'S are the spherical polarizability elements in the molecular frame. Now that there is a relation between the laboratory frame and the molecular frame, a laboratory coordinate system must be chosen. Let the light be incident along the Y axis, and view the 90° scattering along the X axis. The polarization perpendicular to this scattering plane is called V and the polarization in the plane H.38 From this arrangement there are four possible combinations of the incident and scattered polarizations for the system: VV, VH, HV, and HH, where the first letter indicates the polarization of the incident beam and the second letter the polarization of the scattered light. In the laboratory frame a single element of the polarizability tensor, 8§k(Q), is selected for 15 each of the four spectra. The equations can be exemplified using the VH scattering geometry. The B;k(O) selected by VH scattering is V . V V eyz(9) = 1[81(Q) + s_1(a)] - . (2) + (2) v - 1;[Dlm (a) D_1m(a))sm(MF). (21) where the appropriate terms are obtained from Equations 18 and 19. From Equation 21 the time correlation function becomes V* v _ (2)* . (2)* . - in<[D1“ (9 ) + D-ln (9 )) X[D{;)(O) + Dfi;(n)]82*(MF)Bz(MF)>. (22) In order to proceed further with the evaluation of the correlation function one must evaluate the probability that in any time t a molecule will have rotated through an angle between A9 and A9 + d(AO) from its initial orientation 9; that is, some form must be given for the single particle orientational probability density, P(AQ,t). Here the implicit assumption is that the probability density depends only on the change in angle and not the initial angle. The probability density provides information about the reorientational motion of the molecule. In fact, any experiment that can be devised to gain some understanding about the rotations will probe P(AQ,t). One possible functional form for P(A9,t) is an expansion in terms of a sum of products of the Wigner matrices and an arbitrary function of time, f££)(t).38 P(AO,t) then becomes 16 P(AQ,t) = z D(:)(An)f(£)(t). (23) 2k The D matrices will operate on one another to give the following transformation property: D(2)* . _ (2)* (2)* nm (O ) - 2Dn2 (O)ngm (IO), (24) l which along with Equation 23 will change Equation 22 into ;(9 )8; :(O)> = 2 (1/81:2 )rded(AO)z k(D(:)(AO)£(“(L)} mn (2)* (2)* + (2)* (2)* X{:'Dln, (Q)Dn,n (LO) D_ln,(O)Dn,n (AO)} X{D£;)(O) + D(2)(O)}B: (MF)B;(MF). (25) Upon integration over Q and A9 and application of the orthogonality condition for the D matrices,41 Equation 25 simplifies to <8“ (O')sv (n)> = c i I8V(MF)l2f (2)(:). (26) Y2 Y2 Om____2 m m Up to this point nothing has been assumed about the molecular reorientation mechanism. As a molecule rotates in a liquid, the sharp vibrational transitions seen for an isolated molecule will be broadened due to the changing interactions with the other molecules in the liquid. The broadening is therefore characteristic of the liquid and of the method of molecular rotation. The functional form of the broadened transition is described by Equation 26, which, as written, is independent of any choice of model. By selecting a model that is appropriate for the experimental data collecting technique, Equation 26 can be written in a form that will yield the reorientational correlation function from the collected data. 17 Symmetric top molecules are reasonably simple ones to consider when finding an explicit expression for Equation 26, since fé2)(t) = ff;)(t). If the major symmetry axis is taken to be the Z axis in the molecular frame, then f§2)(t) is the correlation fUnction for the tumbling of the major axis of the molecule. The two functions f£2)(t) and f§2)(t) contain information about both the tumbling motion and the reorientation about the major axis. The problem is to determine the functional form of f£2)(t) by using a model for the reorientation of the molecule. For symmetric top molecules there is one feature that makes the evaluation of f§3)(t) somewhat simpler. Vibrations can be chosen where only one |B;(MF)|2 # O, and since the IB;(MF)I2'S are the coupling coefficients for the correlation function, information can be obtained (2) f(m) symmetry of the molecule lets one choose the vibrations which provide about the (t) that corresponds to the nonzero IB;(MF)I2. The this information. The symmetry of the appropriate vibrations very often determines the form of Bv(MF). Bartoli and Litovitz give a table of the polarizability elements that are nonzero for the different symmetry species of the various point groups of symmetric top molecules.38 In some cases each féz)(t) can be determined separately, but in others linear combinations of f£2)(t) arise. The next step in the problem is to assume a model for the rotational motion. A specific form for Equation 26 has been obtained by assuming a small-step rotational diffusion model.38 This model is applicable only to symmetric top molecules. With this assumption Equation 26 becomes 18 2 (2) \J V _ V 2 9t/ - a2 IBmCMF)| e rm (27) m=-2 where f£2)(t) is expressed as an exponential whose time constant is (2) _ _ 2 ~l Tm _ [OD-L + (D11 Dim] (28) and depends only on the principal rotational diffusion constants of the molecule. From Equations 28 and 27 the rotational diffusion tensor can be determined by studying the reorientational spectra of any two Raman lines that arise from different symmetry vibrations. The reorientational lineshape is seen to be a Lorentzian function with a half-width at half-height (HWHH) that is the reciprocal of the correlation time, TéZ). With these equations, the reorientational motion about an axis perpendicular to the major symmetry axis and about an axis parallel to the symmetry axis,38 can be studied. If, instead of assuming an isotropic medium with small-step rotational diffusion, the case of an anisotropic medium, where there exists a preferential molecular orientation, is considered, it is found that there is a different form for fngz)(t)-2 The difference in form arises because the rotational motion is no longer random, but there is a driving force that tends to rotate the molecules back toward an aligned state. Such a motion leads to a mathematical form for the correlation fUnction that looks like: £ng) (t) = Hie-4%, (29) 1 so that Equation 26 becomes 19 v , v _ v . i - a z le(MF)l Ecie m . (30) m=~2 1 Since Equation 30 contains an infinite sum of exponentials, the reorientational lineshapes may be drastically altered. One might expect that these lineshapes would be non-Lorentzian, and that through a suitable experiment this change could be detected as the medium changes from isotropic to anisotropic. Another way of obtaining reorientational relaxation times is to use the Stokes-Einstein relation between the shear viscosity of a liquid and the reorientational correlation time. Bloemberger et a1.42 presented the following equation for spherical-top molecules: :2 = 4na3n/3kT; ' (31) where a is the hydrodynamic rotational radius of the molecule, n is the viscosity of the fluid, and T is the reorientational correlation time. 2 Equation 31 uses sticking boundary conditions and there has been much . . . . 43-48 . discuSSion as to the agreement with experimental data. It is therefore appropriate to consider the consequences of choosing other boundary conditions. Hu and Zwanzig have presented a formulation for calculating a weighting factor based on the degree of slipping that a molecular system will undergo as it rotates.43 This slipping gives rise to a relaxation time that is shorter than that calculated with sticking boundary conditions, so the weighting factor is less than unity. Alms et al.49951 introduced a non- zero intercept into the correlation expression to reproduce their experimental data. This intercept is very similar to the free—rotor correlation time given by Bartoli and Litovitzl’38 as 20 TFR = 2n(4l/36O)(I/kT)1/2, (32) where I is the moment of inertia for that rotation. 44 . . Fury anduJonas obtained an expreSSIOn for T2 of the form T2(T.n) = C(T)n + tom"), (33) where rO(T) is the free—rotor correlation time. Applying the slip/ stick ratio obtained from Hu and Zwanzig43 they obtained the following expression for C(T): C(T) = (4Wa3/3kT)Oeff’ (34) where Geffris the effective slip/stick ratio and can be estimated in three different ways; Geff.= (1/3)i6(oi), (353) eeff = (2/3)9(oxy). (33b) eeff = imi(pi)’ (35c) where i = (x,xz) and pi represents the deviation from sphericity. mi is a weighting factor that is given by “’1 = 03905-1 (36) 1 and is related to an inverse of the area swept out by rotation about the ith axis. As the molecule becomes more spherical Equation 35c approaches the value of Equation 35a, so the difference in the two is related to the non-spherical nature of the molecule and will be reflected in the 21 . . . . 52 resulting correlation times. ASSInk and Jonas have presented another modification to the Stokes—Einstein relation, which is: 3 12 = (4na n/3kT)fR, (37) where fR is the rotational microviscosity factor and is equal to 0.163 for a neat liquid. The expressions derived using slipping boundary conditions work well when there is a reasonable degree of sphericity to the molecular system. It is more likely that the behavior of liquid crystal systems will follow sticking boundary conditions, since they are composed of long, rodlike molecules. Therefore, the equation used by Gierke and Flygaress in the investigation of reorientational relaxation of p-methoxybenzylidine- n-butylaniline (MBBA) was formulated from sticking boundary conditions and a nonzero intercept. The equation they used was a modified form of Equation 31, r = V*n/kT + r0 2 2° (38) V* is the effective molecular volume and can be calculated from density 0 . . . . . . measurements and 12 is the zero v15c051ty intercept given by Equation 32. IV. EXPERIMENTAL The experimental data were collected using a laser Raman system built from components to suit a variety of experimental needs.54’SS Figure 1 shows a block diagram of this instrument. Excitation is provided by either a Spectra-Physics model 165 krypton ion on a Spectra-Physics model 164 argon ion gas laser, each permitting a choice of several excitation wavelengths. The laser emission is sent through a Spectra- Physics model 310-21 polarization rotator to define the incident electric vector, and the light scattered from the sample is passed through a piece of Polaroid film to select the polarization to be analyzed. The scattered light is then focused onto the entrance slit of a Jarrell-Ash model 25-100 double monochromator, and the dispersed radiation is detected by an RCA model C31034A photomultiplier tube cooled to ~30°C by a Products for Research model TE-104TS thermoelectric cooler. The electrical output of the photomultiplier tube is sent either to a picoammeter which detects and amplifies the average current, or to a photon counting system which counts the number of current pulses per unit time. The photon counting system can be interfaced to a mini- computer, and that part of the system will be described in some detail in the next chapter. The sample cell used for simple isotropic liquids is shown in Figure 2. It is fabricated of glass and has Optically flat ends so that the laser light enters without being defocused by the air-glass or glass- liquid interfaces. For samples where the temperature needed to be controlled or monitored, a quartz cuvette of dimensions 7mm x 7mm x 25.4mm 22 23 FIGURE 1. A BLOCK DIAGRAM OF THE LASER RAMAN SYSTEM USED FOR THIS WORK. 5 ------------------------------ LASERI ROTATOR . PDP g 11 i PDP E 8/1 a g , mmfl SPECTROMETERL—a PMT SAMPLE FIGURE 1 25 FIGURE 2. THE GLASS RAMAN CELL USED FOR SIMPLE LIQUIDS 26 mz mqmeHZOHmU< mouoaeomfla b 4 P -- )- I b OOH o.o puooas/siunog ooom~ 57 FIGURE 11. THE 2250 chl VIBRATIONAL BAND OF ACETONITRILE, USED AS INPUT TO PROGRAM LNSHP. 5000 Counts/Second 0. 0 58 2250 cm'1 band of CH3CN Jillllllll'llllIlllllllllllllllllllllllIJ LIIILIJI TIT[ITIVWIIITIIITITlTIlTTITITlTTiTTIrITrlIIITFTTVY—l 2220 2270 Wavenumber Shift (chl) FIGURE 11 59 FIGURE 12. THE OUTPUT OF PROGRAM LNSHP FOR THE 2250 crn_l VIBRATIONAL BAND OF ACETONITRILE. 60 2250 cm‘1 band of CHSCN 1.1“ Relative Intensity ‘0.1 TIIT.TTTTIIIITIITITrllrlrIIITr'TITITTTfrlTTTIITITT] 2220 _1 2270 Wavenumber Shift (cm ) FIGURE 12 61 half-width of 3.0 t 0.5 cmul. This number compares favorably with the half-width obtained by Bartoli and Litovitz using the same experimental and computational methods (3.5 cm-l).1 The reorientational lifetimes calculated through T = l/(ZUCWOR), corresponding to an W0R of 3.0 cm"1 is 1.8 i 0.3 psec. This may be compared to the value Patterson and Griffiths obtained from depolarized Rayleigh scattering (1.8 psec).69 Whittenburg and Wang obtained similar results in a more recent work from half-widths of Raman bands.48 The analysis program was debugged and characterized using acetonitrile and other simple liquids. Some of the pitfalls that were observed while using this technique will be discussed in a later chapter. It should be noted at this point that the technique is very sensitive with regard to the strength of the transition being analyzed. Although this is true of most forms of spectroscopy, the effeCts become even more apparent when one is dealing with a quantity that results from the difference of two very similar experimental measurements. VII. LIFETIME STUDY OF LIQUID CRYSTAL SYSTEMS As was noted in the previous chapter, much work has been done on lineshape analysis of simple liquids, where the overall environment is isotropic and the reorientational bandshape is Lorentzian. It is possible that different theoretical predictions apply when the overall environment is anistotropic, as was shown in Chapter III. In order to test this prediction experimently, a suitable choice of an anisotropic environment must be made. Liquid crystals offer both isotropic and anisotropic media, depending on the temperature chosen. The liquid crystal systems utilized in this study all have a nematic phase, that is, a phase where the long molecules line up like rods. This means that there is a preferential direction in the liquid system, while random disorder remains along the other two axes. Since any nematic liquid crystal could be used to provide an anisotropic medium for Raman bandshape analysis, some choices must be made, based upon work in isotropic liquids, in order to attempt to understand what is happening in the nematic liquid crystal phase. One consideration is whether to use a vibrational band of the liquid crystal itself, or to use some probe molecule to sense the environment. Both types of line- shape measurements have been made in this work. Another requirement is to find a suitable band that is isolated from other vibrations, and if it is a vibration of the liquid crystal molecule, to select one that is not significantly coupled with Other vibrational modes. A third consideration is the temperature range of the phase transitions. The three liquid crystal systems that were studied are: 62 63 p«[(p-ethoxybenzylidene)-amino] benzonitrile (EBB), 4-cyano-4'- pentylbiphenyl (SCB), and n-(p—methoxybenzylidene)-p—butylamine (MBBA). Their structures are shown in Figure 13. Work was first attempted on n-(p-methoxybenzylidene)—p-buty1amine (MBBA); see Figure l3—C. Figure 14 shows the Raman spectra of MBBA in both the nematic liquid crystal (bottom) and isotropic liquid (top) phases. This molecule seemed ideal for use as an anisotropic environ- ment for a suitable guest. Since there is no host scattering around 2200cm-1, acetonitrile (CH CN) was chosen as the guest. Unfortunately, 3 addition of very little acetonitrile (five percent by volume) was enough to effectively break up the liquid crystal order. At that concentration the liquid crystal phase covered a span of only 0.S°, from 15.0° to 15.5°C. At higher concentrations no nematic phase could be observed, and at lower concentrations the GEN vibrational scattering from acetonitrile was hidden in the background fluorescence of the liquid crystal. Even at the five percent concentration the acetonitrile peak at 2225cm'1 was difficult to discern above the background. Since the probe molecule produced such a weak signal on top of fairly strong fluorescence, even data collected for long periods of time (two days for each polarization) still contained so much noise that the lineshape analysis program would not converge. This method might prove fruitful under different conditions, as will be outlined in the next chapter. The second liquid crystal system chosen, commercially available from Kodak, was p-[(p-ethoxybenzylidene)-amino]—benzonitrile (EBB), shown in Figure l3-A. It was selected because it has a CEN group at 64 FIGURE 13. STRUCTURES OF EBB, 5CB, AND MBBA 65 H H5C2—O-..—C\:N__C:N p-[(p-EIhoxybenzyIidene)-ominol benzoniIriIe H,,C5-. -. -C':';N 4-cyono—4LpenIbeiphenyl H H3CO -..—C\:N--C H 4 9 N-(p-methoxybenzylidene)-p-butylomine FIGURE 13 66 FIGURE 14. SURVEY RAMAN SPECTRA OF MBBA. TOP: ISOTROPIC PHASE (45°C). BOTTOM: NEMATIC PHASE (25°C) MBBA no 0.” an... ' a..00. OQDWOW .50.. "" U".\'¢O 1.1 67 d; I .0 . KitsuaiuI aAtiEIau O O O V r-x H l E U V H (4.4 -r-1 4: U) s... Q) .0 E :1 C CD > (U 3 O O H FIGURE 14 68 one end that has a stretching mOde which is not strongly coupled with any of the other vibrational modes. Unfortunately, this particular molecule was not very well suited for lineshape analysis because its high fluorescence background almost completely washed out the relatively weak C;N stretch scattering. The next molecule chosen was 4-cyano-4'-pentylbiphenyl (SCB), shown in Figure l3-B. This molecule turned out to be the most suitable of the systems chosen. The published Raman spectra of both the unsubstituted and the deuterated compounds showed that the CEN stretch was strong and isolated.19 The greatest problem with this compound is that it is not readily available. It was therefore necessary to synthesize SCB before any spectroscopic measurements could be made. The synthesis was carried out using a modified procedure based on 71 72 preparations published by Gray et a1. and by Sadashiva and Subba Rao. The first step was a Friedel-Crafts reaction between 4-bromobiphenyl and pentanoyl chloride to give 4-bromo-4'-pentanoylbiphenyl: AlCl 3 C4H9COC1 + C6HS C6H4Br ------ C4H9CO C6H4 C6H4Br. (39) The melting point for this product was 95.S° - 96.S°C which was considered close enough to the published melting point (98°C) to continue.71 Next the carbonyl group was reduced with lithium aluminum hydride in an eighteen hour reflux, with a mixture of diethyl ether and chloroform used as solvent, to yield 4-bromo-4'-pentylbiphenyl: AlClS/EtZO CHCO'CH'CHBr ----------- CSHll°CH'CHBr (40) 4 9 6 4 6 4 LiA1H4/CHC13 6 4 6 4 69 To be certain that the isolated compound was the correct one, the infrared Spectrum of the product was taken and no carbonyl band was observed. The melting point of the compound was 90° - 92°C (literature value 95° - 96°C).71 The third and final step was a substitution reaction whereby the bromine was replaced with a cyano group. This was accomplished by reacting the product from the previous step with cuprous cyanide: CSH11 ' C6H4 ' C6H4Br + CuCN -—-- CSH11 ' C6H4 ' C6H4CN + CuBr. (41) After purification by means of column chromatography, a Raman spectrum of the compund was taken to verify that it was the desired material, SCB. Figure 15 shows the Raman spectra that were obtained, and they do match the published spectra of SCB very well.19 The three traces, from bottom to top, are the solid (15°C), nematic liquid (25°C), and isotropic liquid (45°C) phases. In the spectra of Figure 15, note that the CEN stretch, at 2225cm-1, is a strong, isolated band and is therefore suitable for lineshape analysis. Another feature, not observed by Gray and Mosley because of experimental limitations,19 is the C-H stretching region between 2900 and 3200cm'l, which gives the appearance of a plateau because of the many overlapping bands arising from the different types of C-H stretching modes in SCB. The survey spectra show that this molecule does not have the high background scattering that plagued the other two liquid crystal systems. Figures 16 and 17 show the raw data from the 2225cm'l scattering used for the rotational and vibrational lineshape analysis. As with 70 FIGURE 15. SURVEY RAMAN SPECTRA OF SCB. BOTTOM: SOLID PHASE (15°C); CENTER: NEMATIC PHASE (25°C); TOP: ISOTROPIC LIQUID PHASE (45°C). SCB 1.3 71 “calm ~04... o-umcooooo co .0 0‘ 5.0.0.” “Un'l'm9mmm "“ )“N’MT u-ouooao‘ new " ‘ '- mwm'n: "' Kitsuaiul antletau , .,v .. e.--—.—- '. > - a ' ..A_ _~.—~-—«-< 0.0 L"- 4000 Wavenumber Shift (ch1) 100 FIGURE 15 FIGURE 16. 2225cm- 1 72 SCATTERING FOR SCB IN THE NEMATIC PHASE (25°C). 73 SCB CN Stretch N-phase 1300 : l .i ‘. I i 0 C ’ P . ‘. 3 s I '2 f 3 , a I s '. 3 '2 f : t : ’ '. f : ,' 1 0° '. '° : : F 3 o o g 1 O , ‘ U) ° s IR 3 . +5 :‘ 3 : S ’3 f If. 0 : rt. .1"- , a o . 5. :1; V : v.73“! \ V- " . . SS 8 ‘ z . o x. q \o 0.0 [ITIIITITITINTIIrrTIITTTITITTIIITTTTTrTITITTTTTFZTa4S 2195 Wavenumber Shift (cm-1) FIGURE 16 74 1 FIGURE 17. 2225cm- SCATTERING FOR SCB IN THE ISOTROPIC PHASE (45°C) O\ C) C) C) l Counts/Second 0.0 lllLlllllllJJllllll'lIllll]!ILALIllllugldlullllll[JilllILIIll]! 7S SCB CN Stretch I-phase TTIFTTTTTITTTITIIITITTTTTTTTTITTTTTITlll'fiT—TTTITTTI 2195 1 2245 Wavenumber Shift (cm- ) FIGURE 17 76 the simple liquids, the line labeled P is the polarized scattering and D is the depolarized line. Figure 16 depicts the nematic phase (25°C) and Figure 17 shows the isotropic phase (45°C). The instrumental function required for the vibrational lineshape analysis is measured from a plasma fluorescence line, and is shown in Figure 18, with the frequency axis shifted to correspond to the SCB 2225cm.1 line. The depolarization ratio, after corrections for detector efficiency and polarization leakage are made, is 0.28 for the nematic phase and 0.36 for the isotropic phase. These values, which are larger than that for the 459 cm.1 band of carbon tetrachloride, indicate that the vibration is not completely symmetric.73 This means that the center of mass of the vibration moves with respect to the center of mass of the molecule during a vibrational period. The fit of a convolved Lorentzian with the polarized line to the depolarized line for the isotropic phase is shown in Figure 19. The apparent frequency shift is an artifact of the display portion of the computer program used for the convolution and has no bearing on the results. The Lorentzian function has a half-width of 0.19 t 0.10 cm-l, corresponding to a reorientational correlation time of 28 1 15 psec. The corresponding fit for the nematic phase is shown in Figure 20. In this phase the Lorentzian has a half-width of 0.13 i 0.10 cm-l, corresponding to a reorientational correlation time of 41 i 30 psec. Note that the fit for the nematic phase data is not quite as good, which could be due to the true reorientational function being a sum of Lorentzians rather than a single Lorentzian. However, the experimental error is so large that one cannot critically evaluate this possibility. 77 FIGURE 18. INSTRUMENT FUNCTION FOR THE JARRELL-ASH SPECTROMETER: Ar LASER PLASMA LINE AT 4850A. 78 1100 - Counts/Second O . O O .‘ . O .1 . A- k A A M... “A“ AW ‘ . O Vvvvv‘ '0‘", ‘r—C ‘Vw 1 "v“.I-ww“ '3'. '7 . 0'0 TITTTITI[[lllTTTTTIITITTIIITTI'TITTTITTT'ITIIIITT 2195 2245 Wavenumber Shift (cm-1) FIGURE 18 79 FIGURE 19. LINESHAPE FIT FOR THE 2225cm-1 RAMAN BAND OF SCB IN THE ISOTROPIC PHASE (45°C). 1.1 Relative Intensity -0.1 80 SCB CN Stretch I-phase ‘TITTITTTT'TTT—TTIT—rIIrTIFTITVTITIITTTWTTrrrTTTTTTTI 2195 2245 Wavenumber Shift (cm-l) FIGURE 19 81 FIGURE 20. LINESHAPE FIT FOR THE 2225cm'l RAMAN BAND OF SCB IN THE NEMATIC PHASE (25°C). 1. 1 Relative Intensity -0. 1 82 SCB CN Stretch N—phase FTVTIITFT'ITfTTTIITTTTIITTTVTTTITTITTTTIIVTTITTIT 2195 FIGURE 20 flea... ' "WA-3.3m. Q o eoo‘eoo. . . .,...'U :’0.0.:.....’.. . ‘ a“. 00. .00 ‘0“...0..::?.:: u o.. .~ 00...... o o .00.. "' c t:.:.:-~., 2245 Wavenumber Shift (cm-1) 83 Even though the numbers appear to fall within the common error range, the student t-test74 indicates that they are statistically different. Since the overall correlation function for large molecules is dominated by vibrational relaxation,7s the Vibrational correlation time for SCB in each liquid phase was calculated by convolving a Lorentzian fUnction with the instrument function of the Raman spectro- meter described earlier, and then fitting the resulting function to the vibrational scattering (the polarized band). Figure 21 shows the results for the isotropic phase (45°C) of SCB. The Lorentzian half- width is 3.7 3 0.3 cm-l, corresponding to a vibrational correlation time of 1.4 3 0.2 psec. Figure 22 shows the result for the nematic phase (25°C) of SCB. The Lorentzian half-width for this phase is l+ 3.9 0.3 chI, also corresponding to a vibrational correlation time of I+ 1.4 0.2 psec. It is not too surprising that the vibrational relaxation time for the two different phases is the same, since the local environment does not change a great deal on either side of the phase transition.3 When this work was started it was hoped that the local environment would change enough during a phase transition to produce a significant change in the reorientational correlation times and functions. It is possible that such a change did in fact take place, but the experimental error was large enough that the change could not be detected by the method used. Perhaps another method could be used that would give results with less error, and some possibilities will be discussed in the next chapter. It is also possible that another approach might be useful both as a check, and as a way of extracting 84 FIGURE 21. VIBRATIONAL LINESHAPE FIT TO THE 2225cm-1 RAMAN BAND OF SCB IN THE ISOTROPIC PHASE (45°C). 1. Relative Intensity -0. 1 l 85 SCB CN Stretch I-phase TTUTT—TITT'rIIllTTVTITTlT—rjilIlTlTTIflTIIITITTTTTT' 2195 _1 2245 Wavenumber Shift (cm ) FIGURE 21 86 FIGURE 22. VIBRATIONAL LINESHAPE FIT TO THE 2225 cm.1 RAMAN BAND OF SCB IN THE NEMATIC PHASE (25°C) -O. 87 SCB CN Stretch N-phase 1.1 '- 3 E -‘ :‘s 3. ~ :5 P a: a :3 :. _. :5 Q a: 1" ‘1 P: :- tf of; C .‘ 1 : T I: ’.' a: .00 5‘ '_ 3 3: -r-'I 3:0 m - x a I: f t‘. G.) 'g. «H z‘ I: "I if. m - ‘1. > f , '3 A P CO H Q) C! l ITTTIITTTITTTITTITIITTFIITrTTrj' 2195 TITTTTITrrrIITTrTl‘I _1 2245 Wavenumber Shift (cm ) FIGURE 22 88 different information from the system. It was in this light that density and viscosity measurements were made. Since other researchers have had good success using a Stokes- Einstein relation (as outlined in Chapter III) to compare rotational 44,48,49»53'76’77 this relation was correlation times to viscosities, applied to the reorientational correlation times obtained for SCB. At this point there are two ways that the analysis could have been made. One would have been to calculate the viscOsities from the experimental correlation times and to match those to the experimental viscosities. The other was to use the measured viscosities to calculate correlation times and to match those to the times obtained from the lineshape measurements. The second method was chosen since it was easy to obtain viscosities over a wide temperature range. The viscometer used measured the viscosity in units of centistokes, so the density of SCB had to be obtained at the various temperatures to convert to units of centipoise. The measured densities are tabulated in Table l and compare favorably with those reported by Karat and Madhusudana.29 After the unit conversion the measured viscosities were fit to an Arrhenius type activation energy33’34 using a linear least-squares routine.62 Both the experimental viscosities and those calculated from the Arrhenius equation are given in Table 2. For the isotropic phase (T 2 35°C) the calculated viscosity equation is: n = (1.33 i 0.3) x 10-5 exp [(4340 : 120)/T] centipoise; (42) 89 TABLE 1 Density of 4-cyano-4'-pentylbiphenyl T(°C) DCEm/ml) T(°C) D(8m/ml) 15.0 1.023 33.0 .9764 16.0 1.061 34.0 .9881 17.0 1.012 35.0 .9887 18.0 1.014 36.0 .9965 19.0 1.025 37.0 .9749 20.0 1.022 38.0 .9695 21.0- 1.012 39.0 .9798 22.0 1.018 40.0 .9927 23.0 1.018 41.0 .9991 24.0 . 984 42.0 .9730 25.0 1.037 43.0 .9672 26.0 1.024 44.0 .9556 27.0 1.061 45.0 .9410 28.0 1.044 46.0 .9085 29.0 1.054 47.0 .9096 30.0 1.017 48.0 .8950 31.0 1.030 49.0 .8843 32.0 1.021 50.0 .8563 TABLE 2 Experimental and Calculated Viscosities of 4-cyano-4'-pentylbiphenyl T(°C) n(cp) calc.n(cp) 17.0 55.7 54.2 - 20.0 44.1 44.9 23.0 35.9 37.4 26.0 34.5 31-3 29.0 27.9 26.2 31.0 24.2 23.3 33.0 19.4 20.8 35.0 17.8 17.4 38.0 15.2 15.1 40.0 14.4 13.9 43.0 12.5 12.2 46.0 10.4 10-7 49.0 9.46 9-4 90 for the nematic liquid crystal phase (15°C 5 T 5 35°C) the equation is: n = (6.11 i 3.0) x 10.7 exp [(5310 : 220)/T] centipoise. (43) It seems reasonable that as the liquid becomes more ordered the activation energy for Viscous flow would increase, since there would be a greater hinderance to movement in an ordered system. The reorientational correlation times were calculated using both sticking and slipping boundary conditions. Equation 38 was used for the sticking boundary condition. The unweighted equation is a modification of Equations 33 and 35a and is the form: 3, = (V*n/kT)(1/3)(;e(oi)) + 2W(41/360)(1/kT)l/2o , (44) i The weighted slip equation is taken from Equations 33 and 35c and is: 12 = (V*n/kT)(ZWi9(pi)) + 2n(4l/360)(I/kT)1/2. (45) 1 The fourth equation used is a modification of Equation 37 which incorporates the microviscosity factor and is: 1/2 T2 = (V*n/kT)(O.l63) + 2T(4l/360)(I/kT) . (46) The calculated relaxtion times are summarized in Table 3 along with calculated Viscosities and effective molecular volumes. The volumes were calculated from the densities and are comparable to ones calculated 53°78 The calculated reorientational for molecules of similar size. correlation times from all four equations are longer than those obtained from the Raman lineshape analysis. Those calculated with the microvis— cosity factor (Equation 46) are the closest, but they are still one e>wrm m o.om~ Nu.o o.uus E.Hnu u.mo H.Aa m.Nm o.o~u NA.o o.um~ A.oam u.>m H.w~ u.o~ o.muH Nm.o o.um~ m.cou u.- H.Nu N.qo o.m~o No.o o.u~u A.osa m.ou H.Hu N.am o.mos mu.o o.~mm w.©ou N.um ~.o¢ N.AH o.maw Nm.c o.~um m.ooa ~.oa H.o~ ~.mo c.3uu N©.c o.~aN u.©~© N.Aw o.c&o ~.HA c.5ou uo.o o.~aq A.oww N.SH o.o~o ~.om o.mmo w~.o o.~ww a.o~o N.NA c.mm~ H.wm o.mom wN.o o.NNo a.omo N.~N o.mom H.ma o.wwo uw.o o.~om A.NAH N.oo o.uoo H.mp o.wam ms.o o._oq s.~o~ H.om o.qau H.om o.m- mm.o o.~ua A.Hmm H.u~ o.mma H.Am o.~ma mo.o o.~oo a.~mm H.o~ o.¢~u p.50 o.~om uu.c o.~mw A.Nau H.mm o.oou H.uu o.~o~ um.o o.~m~ A.NuH H.mH o.mqa H.mo o.~ao mo.o o.~sm A.N~¢ H.su o.mas H.Nm o.~uo ao.o o.~mo A.~u~ ~.mm o.me H.Hm o.-m 92 a~.o A~.o Am.o AA.o am.o ao.o Au.o Am.c no.0 mo.o o.~uu o.-u o.HNN o.HHu o.HHN o.~ou o.Hou o.ocma o.ooau o.owom a>wro u anosnwscmav A.HAA A.~mm A.wa A.wuw n.5co a.mmm A.mm~ A.o~o b.0mw A.mua H.Nm H.Nm H.No H.H¢ H.Hw H.HH H.o< H.om c.00u 0.0mm c.5mo c.5uq c.amm o.AAA o.awo c.5NA o.>ou o.uca c.wmw c.muo o.NHN o.~o~ o.~mo o.H©w o.~mq c.Hmm c.~uu o.HuN o.~¢a o.HoA 93 order of magnitude longer. It is interesting to note that the weighted slip correlation times are closer to the sticking boundary condition than the unweighted slip times are. This is just the opposite of what Fury and Jonas observed,44 and indicates that sticking boundary conditions may better describe SCB. Since sticking boundary conditions may do a better job of describing the reorientational behavior of systems comprised of long, rod-like molecules such as 5CB, the question arises as to why the results from Equation 38 are two orders of magnitude longer than those calculated from the Raman lineshapes. The Stokes-Einstein relation assumes that the molecules are in a fluid of continuous Viscosity.79 This Continuous medium assumption is not valid in a neat liquid and therefore a correction should be made. Gierer and Wirtz8O postulated a model involving concentric solvent shells, which for a neat liquid reduces to Equation 37 and contains the microviscosity term. This explains why Equation 46 does a better job in matching the Raman results. It is still bothersome that the results of Equation 46 and the Raman results differ by one order of magnitude. One possible explanation for this discrepancy may be that the hydrodynamic models were developed using spherical, or nearly spherical, molecules. Elongated liquid crystal molecules are not spherical and will probably behave somewhat differently when undergoing rotations. If this is the case, then one might wonder about the validity of attempting to match the hydrodynamic results to the lineshape results. Since other researchers were able to obtain satisfactory results with the two methods,44"4°’48'°1’°:”’77’81 94 it was assumed that similar agreement could be obtained using SCB. Since this is not the case it might be interesting to look into the differences more at a later date. VIII. CONCLUSIONS In this work attempts were made to observe two different types of relaxation processes involving anisotroPic media. One process was the relaxation of a liquid crystal molecule in both the nematic and isotropic phases. The other was the relaxation of a guest molecule surrounded by molecules of a liquid crystal. Results for the first process, only, could be Obtained. These results include both reorientational and vibrational relaxation from Raman lineshapes. Reorientational correla- tion times were also obtained for the liquid crystal system from viscosity measurements. The reorientational lifetimes obtained from Raman lineshapes which are reported here can only be considered as approximate values, due to the magnitude of the error associated with them. However, they do indicate that more work must be done on the applicability of hydro- dynamic theory for calculating correlation times in complex fluids, since the correlation times calculated from viscosity data differ from the Raman results by more than the combined experimental error. This study does reinforce the vibrational relaxation work of other researchers, which indicate that on a short time scale the total correlation function is dominated by Vibrational relaxatio:n.‘°’7S Since this research is just one piece in a large puzzle, it is appropriate to suggest other experiments that could be performed, and also experiments that should not be attempted. It would be very interesting to obtain the rotational and possibly the vibrational relaxation of a guest molecule in an anisotropic host, as was attempted 9S 96 here with acetonitrile in MBBA. In order for this type of experiment to succeed one must keep the guest concentration low enough to insure that the host still has an anisotropic phase. At such low concentra- tions any host fluorescence becomes a problem that cannot be ignored. The most obvious solution to this problem is to find a suitable host that does not fluoresce, or to find a suitable quencher that can be inserted into the host in very low concentrations. Since most liquid crystal systems are aromatic, some fluorescence is likely in almost every case. One way to reduce the fluorescence is to find a molecule that has an electron withdrawing group, such as NO on the aromatic . 82 ring. 2, One could obviate the fluorescence background problem by preforming Coherent Anti-Stokes Raman Scattering (CARS) experiments. Since anti- Stokes scattering is monitored, fluorescence would be minimized.83 Another method would be to use a pulsed laser source and gated detection electronics. This experimental setup is useful since the lifetime of the Raman scattering is shorter than the risetime of the fluorescence signal. As was mentioned earlier, there are a number of pitfalls associated with extracting the reorientational function from a Raman band. One problem arises from truncation error when Lorentzian functions are deconvulated by Fourier transformation.84 This problem could possibly be overcome by using the solution of a Fredholm integral equation Of the first kind,85’86 in which a finite time range of the data is exactly accounted for. With this approach it might be possible to obtain differences in the correlation functions arising from both vibrations and rotations at longer times. 97 Another problem is caused by overlapping bands, and this is particularly severe when the bands have different polarization characteristics. Any attempt to mathematically separate overlapping bands will change the overall shape of each individual band, and this effect will more than likely be different for depolarized scattering than for polarized scattering. This is the main reason why care should be taken when choosing a Raman band for analysis. Weak bands pose another problem. In order to obtain reliable lineshapes, the relative signal-to-noise ratio must be high; that is, the noise level must be many times smaller than the difference between the baseline and the peak maximum. Some ways of experimently dealing with this problem have been outlined by Griffiths.87 As a last resort, weak bands with a low S/N can be digitally smoothed. However, this 64 technique may also change the overall shape of a Raman band and thus could change the final results unless an appropriate correction is used. APPENDICES APPENDIX A PROGRAM DATCOL A FORTRAN/SABR program that controls a Jarrell-Ash Raman spectro- meter and collects counts from the photomultiplier tube. 98 99 PROGRAM DATCOL. FT CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC’ OOOOOODOOOOOQOOOODOOOOOOO000000GOOD0000OOOOOOOOOOOOOODOOOOOOOOOOOOOO PROGRAM DATCOL RAMAN DATA TAKING PROGRAM PROGRAM WILL CONTROL THE JARRELL-ASH RAMAN SPECTROMETER ‘AS WELL AS COLLECT THE COUNTS COMING FROM THE PMI'. IT WILL TAKE UP TO 100 SCANS OVER A REGION OF INTEREST. WHEN THE ENDING FREQUENCY IS REACHED. THE GRATING WILL BE PUT BACK AT THE STARTING FREQUENCY. BACKLASH IN THE GEARS IS TAKEN CARE OF BY GOING 50 CM-l BY THE STARTING FREQUENCY AND COMING BACK TO IT. THIS WILL NOT AUTOMATICALLY HAPPEN IF THE STARTING FREQUENCY IS LESS THAN 70 CM-l. THE COUNT TIME CAN BE VARIED FROM 100 PEEC TO 40 SEC. EACH DATA FILE IS ENDED WITH A NEGATIVE NUMBER. THE PROGRAM CAN BE INTERRUPTED BY A CONTROL G. THE OPERATOR THEN HAS THE OPTION OF CONTINUING. CLOSING THE FILE AND STOPPING. OR. STOPPING WITHOUT CLOSING THE FILE. IF THE PROGRAM IS CONTINUED. THE OPERATOR HAS THE OPTION OF CHANGING SOME OF THE PARAMETERS. WHEN THE RUN IS OVER. THE OPERATOR HAS THE OPTION-TO RESTART. MOVE THE GRATING. 0R CRUNCH DATA. COMMON VARIABLES USED IN THIS PROGRAM SN MAXIMUM NUMBER OF COUNTS DESIRED XNU CURRENT FREQUENCY INSTURMENT IS AT YCNT‘ COUNTS/SEC AT XNU [STEP NUMBER OF STEPS STEPPING PDTDR WILL TAKE BETWEEN DATA POINTS TIME MAXIMUM COUNT TIME TMIN MINIMUM COUNT TIME SNU STARTING FREQUENCY FNU ENDING FREQUENCY NSTEP NUMBER OF STEPS RECORDER WILL TAKE BETWEEN DATA POINTS INTERNAL VARIABLES DEV OUTPUT STORAGE DEVICE FILE OUTPUT STORAGE FILE NAME RESOL DESIRED FREQUENCY INTERVAL BETWEEN DATA POINTS YMAX MAXIMUM COUNT/SEC RANGE FOR PLOT IY INTEGER Y COORDINATE FOR PLOT NTIMES NUMBER OF SCANS OVER REGION ITEMP TEMPORARY [STEP STORAGE AY TEMPORARY STORAGE FOR PLOT PARAMETER IMO MONTH IDAY DAY IYR YEAR XDONE LAST X VALUE YDONE LAST Y VALUE STEP CM-l/INCH RECORDER WILL MOVE IVAL CHARACTER STORAGE IC FLAG FOR CONTROL C IG FLAG FOR CONTROL G SUBROUTI NES USED OOPEN( DEV. F ILE) SCST( I) SAMPLE SCAN ( J) SCPLT( NSTEP . I) OCLOSE BELL 100 DATCOL. CONT. C SCEND C EXPP C LIMJT(IL.RVAR.IH) C ERASE C YESNO(IVAL) CHAIN KEHEK(IDUM) FILE(DEV.FIL.IMDDE) CHANGE LETIN(IVAL.IC.IG) STEPHEN M. GREGORY APRIL 17. 1978 CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC COMMON SN.XNU.YCNT.ISTEP.TIME.TMIN.NSTEP.SNU.FNU.YMAX DIMENSION DEV(100).FNAME(100) CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC‘ C C GET DATE WORD C CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC S DUMMY DATE S TAD I DATE 8 DCA TEMP S TAD TEMP S AND (7 S DCA iYR S TAD TEMP S RAR S RTR S AND (37 S DCA {DAY S TAD TEMP S CLL RAL S RTL S RTL S AND (17 S DCA 1M0 GO TO 1 S CPAGE 3 S DATE. 6211 S 7666 S TEMP. 0 1 IF(IMD)2.2.3 2 WRITE(1.100) GO TO 29 CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC' C C SET UP INITIAL VALUES C CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC 3 CALL BELL IYRFIYRfia WRITE(1.101) IMD.IDAY.IYR. WRITE (1.102) READ (1.103) TIME.TMIN READ (1.104) SNU.FNU READ (1.105) SN READ (1.106) RESOL READ (1.107) NTIMES READ(1.108) STEP READ(1.109) YMAX XNU=SNU ISTEP=IFIXIRESOL¥20.) STEP=300.*RESOL/STEP NSTEP‘LIMIT(1.STEP.2047) DO 5 I=1.NTIMES 4 IMODE=0 101 DATCOL. CONT. WRITE(1.110) I CALL FILE( DEV( I) .FNAPE( I) . IMDE) IMODE=IMODE+3 GO TO (3.29.4.5) IMODE 5 CONTINUE CALL ERASE CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC C C COLLECT DATA C CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC DO 20 I81.NTIMES CALL OOPEN(DEV(I).FNAME(I)) CALL SCST(0) IF(XNU-FNU)7.7.15 CALL SAMPLE CALL SCAN(1) AYiYCNT*2047./YMAX IY‘LIMITCO.AY.2047) CALL SCPLT(NSTEP.IY) CALL KCHEK(IDUM) IF(IDUM)14.14,8 8 WRITE(1.111) XNUQYCNT CALL YESNO(IVAL) IF(IVAL-89)11.9.11 9 WRITE(1.112) CALL YESNO(IVAL) IF(IVAL-89)14.10.14 10 CALL CHANGE GO TO 14 11 WRITE(1.113) CALL YESNO(IVAL) IF(IVAL-89)13.12.13 12 WRITE(4.114) XNU.YCNT XNU=XNU+RESOL GO TO 15 13 XNU=XNU¥RESOL CALL SCEND GO TO 16 14 WRITE (4.114) XNU.YCNT XNU=XNU+RESOL ‘ GO TO 6 l5 XDONE3-1000. YDONE=0. WRITE(4.114) XDONE.YDONE CALL OCLOSE CALL SCEND CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCECCCCCCC C C MOVE GRATING BACK TO STARTING POINT C CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC 16 XNU=XNUPRESOL CALL SCAN(2) 17 ITEMP=ISTEP IF(SNU-70.)18,18.19 18 CALL BELL READ( 1.115) IBLOCK 19 ISTEP=1000 CALL SCAN(2) CALL SCAN(1) ISTEP=ITEMP 20 CONTINUE CALL BELL WRITE(1.116) CALL YESNO(IVAL) IF(IVAL-89)21.29.21 21 WRITE(1.117) «no 102 DATCOL . CONT . 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 CALL LETTN(IVAL.IC.IG) IF(IC-1)22.29.22 IF(IG—1)23.21.23 IF(IVAL-210)24.26.24 IF(IVAL-847)25.27.25 IF(IVAL-257)21.28.21 CALL ERASE CALL CHAIN(’CRDNCR’) CALL ERASE CALL CHAIN(’MOVE’) CALL ERASE GO TO 3 CALL EXIT CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC C C C FORMAT STATEMENTS CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 1.1 1 112 113 114 115 116 117 FORMAT( ’ ENTER CURRENT DATE AND RESTART PROGRAM’) FORMAT(’ DATE IS ’.2X. I2.’/’.I2.’/197’.I1) FORMAT( ’ RAMAN DATA TAKING PROGRAM’) FORMAT( ’ MAX COUNT TII‘E IN SEC = ’.F10.4/’ MIN COUNT TIME 1 IN SEC 3 ’.Fl0.4) FORMAT( ’ STARTING POINT 3 ’.F10.4/’ ENDING POINT 8 '.F10.4) FORMAT(’ DESIRED NUMBER. OF COUNTS 3 ’.F10.4) FORMAT( ’ SPACING BETWEEN DATA POINTS 3 ’ .F10.4) FORMAT( ’ HOW MANY SCANS ? ’ .13) FORMAT1’ CM-I/INCH 0N RECORDER ‘-' ’ .F10.4) FORMAT( ’ MAXIMUM COUNT/SEC ON RECORDER = ’ .F10.4) FORMAT( ’ OUTPUT FILE ’ . 12) FORMAT( ’ CURRENT FREQUENCY IS ’ .F10.4/’ CURRENT COUNTS/SEC 1 ARE ’.E10.4/’ DO YOU WANT TO CONTINUE 9’) FORMAT( ’ DO YOU WANT TO CHANGE ANY OF THE PARAI‘ETERS ?’) FORMAT( ’ DO YOU WANT TO SAVE THE COLLECTED DATA ?’) FORMAT(2A6) FORMAT( ’ BLOCK THE SLITS AND HIT RETURN’ . I1) FORMAT( ’ DONE ?’) FORMAT( ’ CRUNCH. MOVE. OR DATCOL 7’) END SUBROUTINE SAMPLE. FT SUBROUTINE SAMPLE CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC OODDOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO SUBROUTINE TO COUNT PHOTONS INITIAL COUNT PERIOD IS 100 PEEC AND IT WILL COUNT UP TO 40 SEC COMMON VARIABLES USED YCNT COUNTS/SEC. SN SIGNAL/NOISE TII‘E COUNT TIME TMIN MINIMUM COUNT TIME I NTERNAL VARI ABLES IXH H I GB OVERFLOW STORAGE I YL LOW ORDER COUNT STORAGE I YH HIGH ORDER COUNT STORAGE AYL FLOATI N G I YL AYH FLOAT I N G I YH AXH FLOAT! NC I XH YC TEMP COUNTS/SEC TMAX MAXIMUM COUNTING TII‘E SAMPLE . UHDDODOO mmmmmmmmmmmmmmonnnoo mmmmwm ODOOOOOOGOODOOOOOOOOOOOOO CONT. 2532 103 INTEGER COUNT TIDE STORAGE FOR DEB OF LOW COUNT STORAGE FOR DEB OF HIGH COUNT STORAGE FOR DSB OF OVERFLOW WORD SUBROUTINES CALLED DFIX (RVAR. IH. IL) DFLOT ( IH. IL. RVAR.) OPERATIONS DEF INED LPSET LOAD PRESET REGISTER STPGM START PROGRAM CLOCK LCTRL LOAD CONTROL REGISTER POSKP PGM OFLOW SKIP CLRCT CLEAR RAMAN COUNTER COUNT START PHOTON COUNTING STPCT STOP COUNTING LTCTR LATCH COUNTER INTO COMPUTER CLRLO CLEAR LOW OVERFLOW CBKHO CHECK HIGH OVERFLOW CLRHO CLEAR HIGH OVERFLOW SDIPLL SAMPLE LOW COUNT SMPLH SAMPLE HIGH COUNT DRIVE DRIVE INTO AC STEPHEN M. GREGORY APRIL 12. 1978 CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC OPDEF LPSET 6121 /LOAD PRESET REGISTER OPDEF STPGM 6 123 /START PROGRAM CLOCK OPDEF LCTRL 6 131 /LOAD CONTROL REGISTER SKPDF POSIG’ 6132 /PGM OFLOW SKIP OPDEF CLRCT 6601 /CLEAR RAMAN COUNTER OPDEF COUNT 6602 /START PHOTON COUNTING OPDEF STPCT 6608 /S'IOP COUNTING OPDEF LTCTR 6604 /LATCH COUNTER INTO COMPUTER OPDEF CLRLO 6606 /CLEAR LOW OVERFLOW SKPDF CHKHO 6607 /CHECK HIGH OVERFLOW OPDEF CLRHO 6611 /CLEAR HIGH OVERFLOW OPDEF SMPLL 6612 /SAMPLE LOW COUNT OPDEF SMPLH 6613 /SAMPLE HIGH COUNT OPDEF DRIVE 6617 /DRIVE INTO AC COMMON SN. XNU. YCNT. ISTEP. TIDIE.TMIN. NSTEP.SNU. FNU.YMAX INITIALIZE IXH=0 NYH=0 NYL=0 IYL=0 IYH=0 NXR=0 TMIN=TMIN=IK 100 . CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC CLRCT CLA CLL CALL DFIX( TMIN. IH. IMIN) CALL DFLOT( IH. IMIN.TMIN) TMIN=TMIN/ 100. CLA CLL TAD LCTRL CLRLO CLRHO CLACLL ( 4404 1 04 SAMPLE. CONT. S TAD IMIN S C I A S LPSET S CLA CLL CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC C C COUNT FOR TMIN SEC C CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC S STPGM S COUNT S B. CHKHO / CHECK HIGH, OVERFLOW S J D? ‘ C S JD? D S C . POSKP / CHECK CLOCK OVERFLOW S JD? B S STPCT /STOP COUNTING S CHKHO S J D? F S I 52 1 KB S NOP S CLRHO S F . CLA CLL S LTCTR S 8MPLL S NOP S DRI VE. S DCA 1 YL S SD?LH S NOP S DRIVE S DCA IYR S JD? E S D . I 82 i XH S NOP S CLRHO S JD? C S E . NOP III3 0 CALL DFLOT( IYR. IYL.AY) CALL DFLOT( IH. IXH. AXH) CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCGCCCCCCCC C C CALCULATE COUNT/SEC C CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC YCNTa AY+AXH*8192 . IF(YCNT-SN) 1. 12. 12 YC=YCNT/TMIN IF(YCNT)2. 12.2 TMAX=ABS(SN/YC) IF(TMAX-TMIN)3.4.4 TMAX=TMIN IF( TMAX-TIDE)5.5. l2 TI=TIDIE*100. IF(TI-4096. )?.7.6 T134096. TM=TMAX=K100. IF(TM'40960)9’998 TM=4096. IF(TM-TI)11. ll. 10 TM=TI CALL DFIX( TM. IH. ITO) IH=0 CALL DFLOT( IH. I.TC.TM) TMAX=TDV 100. ' CLRCT CLRHO CLRLO A—om do now N H HO mmm 105 smut. com. CLA CLL TAD iTC CIA LPSET CLA CLL IXB?0 NYL=0 NYH=O IYL=0 IYH*O NXB=0 S CLA CLL CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC. C mmmmm C START COUNTING C CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC S STPGM S COUNT S BB. ClflflD S JMP CC S JMP DD S CC. POSEP S JMP BB S STPCT S CHKHO S JMP FF S 182 1X3 S NOP S CLRHO S FF. CLA CLL S LTCTR S SHPLL S NOP S DRIVE S DCA iYL S SMPLH S NOP S DRIVE S DCA iYH S JMP EE S DD. 182 1X3 S NOP S CLRHO S JMP CC S EE. NOP 1330 CALL DFLOT(IYH.IYL.AY) CALL DFLOT(IH.IXH.AXE) CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC' C C CALCULATE COUNTVSEC C CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC YCNT’AY¥AXH*8192. GO TO 13 12 YCNT=YCNT7TMIN GO TO 14 13 YCNT=YCNTVTMAX 14 RETURN END 106 SUBBOUTINE SCAN.FT SUBROUTINE SCAN(IWAY) CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC C SUBROUTINE TO DRIVE STEPPING MOTOR COMMON VARIABLES USED ISTEP NUMBER OF STEPS INTERNAL VARIABLES IWAY 1 FOR FORHARD 2 FOR.REVERSE SUBROUTINES CALLED NONE OPERATIONS DEFINED REVS MOVE GRATING IN REVERSE DIRECTION PORNO MOVE GRATING FORWARD STEP STEP THE STEPPING MOTOR.ONCE STEPHEN M. GREGORY APRIL 12. 1978 C CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC S OPDEF REVS 6614 /REVERSE OPDEF FORWD 6615 /FORNARD OPDEF STEP 6616 /STEP DRIVE MOTOR COMMON SN,XNU,YCNT.ISTEP.TIME.TMIN.NSTEP,SNU,FNU.YMAX CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC C C MOVES TEE GRATING A DISTANCE OF RESOL C CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCG DO 4 I81,ISTEP GO TO (1,2)IWAY CONTINUE FORHD GO TO 3 CONTINUE REVS CONTINUE STEP CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC. A WAIT LOOP TO LET EVERYTHING SETTLE DOWN. STEPPING MOTOR CANNOT STEP FASTER.TRAN 441.50L CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC CLA CLL TAD (2000 CIA A. IAC ' SZA JMP A NOP CONTINUE RETURN END C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C S S C JMDCOWQUJQIDOOOOOOIDCOWN wv‘ 107 SURROUTINE CRANGE.FT SUBROUTINE CHANGE CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC SUBROUTINE TO CHANGE PARAMETERS DURING A RAMAN DATA RUN. COMMON VARIABLES USED SN MAXIMUM NUMBER.OF COUNTS DESIRED ISTEP NUMBER OF STEPS STEPPING MOTOR.WILL TAKE BETWEEN DATA POINTS TIME MAXIMUM COUNT TIME TMIN MINIMUM COUNT TIME NSTEP NUMBER OF STEPS RECORDER WILL TAKE BETWEEN DATA POINTS SNU STARTING FREQUENCY FNU ENDING FREQUENCY YMAX MAXIMUM COUNTS/SEC ON RECORDER INTERNAL VARIABLES RESOL DESIRED FREQUENCY INTERVAL BETWEEN DATA POINTS STEP CMFl/INCH RECORDER.WILL MOVE IVAL CHARACTER.STORAGE 00000000000000000000000 SUBROUTINES USED ERASE YESNO(IVAL) LIMJT(IL.RVAR.IH) STEPHEN M. GREGORY APRIL 12. 1978 CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC COMMON SN,XNU.YCNT,ISTEP.TIME.TMIN.NSTEP.SNU,FNU.YMAX CALL ERASE gCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC 0000000000 C MAXIMUM COUNT TIME C CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC WRITE(1.IOO) CALL YESNO(IVAL) IF(IVAL-89)2.l.2 1 READ(1.101) TIME CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC C C MINIMUM COUNT TIME C CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC 2 WRITE(1.102) CALL YESNO(IVAL) IF(IVAL-89)4.3.4 3 READ(1.101) TMIN CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC C C STARTING FREQUENCY C CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC 4 WRITE(1,103) CALL YESNO(IVAL) IF(IVAL-89)6,5,6 3 READ(1.101) SNU CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC C C ENDING FREQUENCY C CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC 108 CHANGE. CONT. 6 WRITE(1.104) CALL YESNO(IVAL) IF(IVAL-B9)8.7,8 7 READ(1.101) FNU CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC C C TOTAL NUMBER.OF COUNTS C CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC 8 WRITE(1.105) CALL YESNO(IVAL) IF(IVAL-89)10.9.10 9 READ(1.101) SN CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC‘ C C SPACING BETWEEN DATA POINTS C \ CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC IO WRITE(I.IOG) CALL YESNO(IVAL) IF(IVAL-89)I2.II,12 II READ(I.IOI) RESOL ISTEP=IFIX(RESOL*20.) CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC C C CH‘l/INCH ON RECORDER C CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC 12 WRITE(I.IO7) CALL YESNOCIVAL) IF(IVAL-89)l4.l3.l4 I3 READ(I.IOI) STEP STEP=SOO.*RESOL/STEP NSTEP=LIMIT(I.STEP.2047) CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC C C MAXIMUM.COUNTS/SEC ON RECORDER C CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC 14 WRITE(1.108) CALL YESNO(IVAL) IF(IVAL-89)16.l5,16 15 READ(1.101) YMAX 16 CALL ERASE RETURN CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC C C FORMAT STATEMENTS C CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC 100 FORMAT(’ MAXIMUM COUNT TIME ?’) 101 FORMAT(’? ',F10.4) 102 FORMAT(’ MINIMUM COUNT TIME ?’) 103 FORMAT(' STARTING FREQUENCY ?') 104 FORMAT(’ ENDING FREQUENCY 7’) 105 FORMAT(' TOTAL NUMBER OF COUNTS ?’) 106 FORMAT(’ SPACING BETWEEN DATA POINTS ?') 107 FORMAT(’ CMFI/INCH ON RECORDER ?’) 108 FORMAT(’ MAXIMUM COUNTS/SEC ON RECORDER ?’) END APPENDIX B PROGRAM MOVE A FORTRAN/SABR program to move the grating of a Jarrell-Ash Raman spectrometer. It will also calibrate the system with respect to the excitation frequency. 109 110 PROGRAM MOVE.FT CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC 0000000000000000000000 000000000000000000000000 PROGRAM MOVE THIS PROGRAM WILL MOVE THE GRATING OF THE RAMAN SPECTROMETER TO A NEW FREQUENCY. IF THE STARTING FREQUENCY HAS NOT BEEN DETERMINED. THEN THIS PROGRAM WILL RUN OVER THE EXCITING LINE AND SET THE GRATING THE DESIRED DISTANCE AWAY. MONOCHROMETER MUST BE SET UP SO THAT IT IS 5 CM-l ABOVE THE EXCITING FREQUENCY WHEN CALIBRATING. COMMON VARIABLES USED SN MAXIMUM NUMBER OF COUNTS DESIRED XNU CURRENT FREQUENCY INSTRUMENT IS AT YCNT COUNTS/SEC AT XNU ISTEP NUMBER OF STEPS STEPPING MOTOR WILL TAKE BETWEEN DATA POINTS TIME MAXIMUM COUNT TIME STEP CMFl/INCH RECORDER WILL MOVE TMIN MINIMUM COUNT TIME INTERNAL VARIABLES Y ARRAY FOR COUNT/SEC STORAGE ITOP INDEX FOR MAXIMUM IN Y ARRAY XSET FREQUENCY TO BE SET DIST DISTANCE TO BE MOVED IMO MONTH IDAY DAY IYR YEAR SUBROUTINES USED SAMPLE SCAN(J) BELL ERASE LETIN(IVAL,IC.IG) YESNO(IVAL) CHAIN KOHEK(IDUM) STEPHEN M. GREGORY APRIL 17. 1978 CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC COMMON SN,XNU,YCNT,ISTEP.TIME.TMIN.NSTEP,SNU.FNU.YMAX DIMENSION Y(200) CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC C C C GET DATE WORD CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC UJUJUIUJUJUJUJUJUJUIUJWWUJ WRITE(I,100) DUMMY DATE TAD I DATE DCA TEMP TAD TEMP AND (7 DCA IYR TAD TEMP RAR RTE AND (37 DCA iDAY TAD TEMP CLL RAL RTL 111 MOVE. CONT. S RTL S AND (17 S DCA iMO GO TO 1 S CPAGE 3 8 DATE. 6211 S 7666 S TEMP. 0 1 IF(IMO)2,2,4 2 CALL BELL WRITE(1.101) 3 STOP 4 CALL BELL IYR=IYR+8 WRITE(1.102) IMO.IDAY.IYR CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC C C BRANCH TO DESIRED ROUTINE C CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC 5 WRITE(1.103) CALL LETIN(IVAL.IC.IG) IF(IC‘I)6,3.6 IF(IC-I)7.5.7 IF(IVAL-I93)5.29,5 CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC m'das SET DISTANCE TO BE MOVED . CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC READ(1.104) XNU READ(1 . 105) XSET CALL ERASE DIST=XSET-XNU IF(DIST)11.22.12 11 J=2 DIRF-l. GO TO 13 12 J=1 DIR=1. CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC C ~000000 O C MOVE GRATING C CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC 13 DMOVE=.05*DIR ISTEP=1 14 CALL SCAN(J) CALL KCHEK(IDUM) IF(IDUM)15,15.17 15 IF(ABS(DMOVE)-ABS(DIST))16.18.18 16 DMOVE=DMOVE+.05*DIR GO TO 14 17 XD=XNU+DMOVE WRITE(1,106) XD CALL YESNO(IVAL) IF(IVAL-89)22.15,22 18 IF(DIR)19.22.22 CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC C C MOVE GRATING TO RELEAVE BACKLASH C CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC 19 IF(XSET—70.)20.20,21 20 READ(1,107)IBLOCK 21 ISTEP=1000 CALL SCAN(2) CALL SCAN(1) 112 MOVE. CONT. 22 WRITE(1. 108) CALL LETIN(IVAL,IC,IG) IF(IC-1)23.3.23 23 IF(IG-1)24.22,24 24 IF(IVAL-210)25.27,25 25 IF(IVAL-847)26.5.26 26 IF(IVAL-257)22.28.22 27 CALL ERASE CALL CHAIN(’CRUNCH’) 28 CALL ERASE CALL CHAIN(‘DATCOL') CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC C C RUN OVER EXCITING LINE C . CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC 29 CALL ERASE ISTEPSI SN=10000. TIME=5. TMIN=.1 DO 30 I=1.200 CALL SAMPLE Y( I)=YCNT 30 CALL SCAN(1) YMAX=Y(1) DO 32 I=2.200 IF(Y(I)-YMAX)32.31.31 31 YMAX=Y(I) ITOP=I 32 CONTINUE XNU=FLOAT(200-ITOP)*.05 CALL BELL GO TO 10 CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC. C C FORMAT STATEMENTS C CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC 100 FORMAT(‘ PROGRAM TO MOVE THE GRATING') 101 FORMAT(’ ENTER CURRENT DATE AND RESTART PROGRAM’) 102 FORMAT(’ DATE IS ’.12.’/',12.’/197’.I1) 103 FORMAT(’ DO YOU WANT TO MOVE OR CALIBRATE ?‘) 104 FORMAT(’ WHAT FREQUENCY ARE YOU AT NOW ? ’.F10.4) 105 FORMAT(’ WHAT FREQUENCY DO YOU WANT ? ',Fl0.4) 106 FORMAT(' CURRENT FREQUENCY IS ’.F10.4/’ DO YOU WANT TO 1 CONTINUE ?’) 107 FORMAT(’ HIT RETURN AFTER BLOCKING LASER.BEAM',II) 108 FORMAT(‘ CRUNCH. MOVE. 0R DATCOL ?’) END APPENDIX C PROGRAM CRUNCH A FORTRAN/SABR program that will help in the analysis of Raman spectra. The features include plotting, smoothing of spectra, baseline substraction, normalization of peaks, scale expansion on plots, signal averaging, background subtraction, and peak location. 114 PROGRAM CRUNCH. FT CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC’ 00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 PROGRAM CRUNCH PROGRAM TO CRUNCH RAMAN DATA STEPHEN M. GREGORY APRIL 17. 1978 THIS IS THE TRAFFIC DIRECTOR FOR A SET OF PROGRAMS DESIGNED TO DISPLAY AND ANALYZE RAMAN DATA OPTIONS ARE CHOSEN BY TYPING IN THE NAME OF THE.OPTION DESIRED. WHEN A QUESTION IS ASKED THAT REQUIRES A YES OR NO ANSWER. RESPOND WITH A YVN DEPENDING ON YOUR ANSWER. OPTIONS THAT THE PROGRAM HAS ARE PLOTTING. SMOOTHING. CORRECTING FOR A LINEAR BASELINE DRIFT, NORMALIZATION OF SINGLE PEAKS. SCALE EXPANSION OF PLOTS. PRINTING. TRANSLATING TO E FORMAT, AVERAGEING 0F MANY SPECTRA. OR PEAK SUBTRACTION. INITIAL DIALOGUE IS NOT NEEDED FOR TRANSLATING. VARIABLES USED IN THIS PROGRAM AND SUBROUTINES COMMON XMIN MINIMUM FREQUENCY FOR THIS RUN XMAX MAXIMUM FREQUENCY FOR RUN YMIN MINIMUM VALUE OF Y IN RANGE YMAX MAXIMUM VALUE OF Y IN RANGE DELX. FREQUENCY INTERVAL BETWEEN DATA POINTS ITYPE 3 FOR PLOT FOR SMOOTHING FOR BASELINE CORRECTION FOR NORMALIZATION FOR SCALE EXPANSION FOR SIGNAL AVERAGEING FOR PRINTING FOR TRANSLATION FOR PEAK LOCATION DEVI DEVICE INPUT DATA IS STORED ON DEV2 DEVICE OUTPUT DATA IS TO BE STORED ON FILEI INPUT FILE NAME FILE2 OUTPUT FILE NAME IPLOT = 1 FOR.STRIP CHART RECORDER 2 FOR TERMINAL IDONE FLAG RAISED WHEN PROGRAM IS FINISHED X LAST FREQUENCY VALUE READ FROM INPUT FILE Y LAST COUNT VALUE READ FROMIINPUT FILE IPST 1 IF PLOT HAS STARTED ALSO INDEX FOR PEAKS IBASE 1 FOR CALCULATION OF SUMS 2 IF ALL POINTS HAVE BEEN READ IN FOR.BASELINE CALCULATION 3 IF SLOPE AND INTERCEPT HAVE BEEN CALCULATED INORM 1 IF SCALE HAS BEEN DETERMINED NTST 0 UPON ENTERING NORM 1 WHEN YMAX HAS BEEN READ IN -1 WHEN SCALING HAS STARTED ISIG = 1 FOR ADDITION 2 FOR SUBTRACTION Oflfld‘fléGNt-e INTERNAL VARIABLES IVAL USED FOR CHARACTER STORAGE IC USED AS A FLAG FOR CONTROL C IG USED AS A FLAG FOR CONTROL G IMO MONTH IDAY DAY IYR YEAR IMODE I/O MODE AND RETURN FLAG CRUNCH. O OOOOGOOOOOOOOOODOOOOO CONTfi 115 SUBROUTTNES CALLED BELL YESNO(IVAL) LETIN(IVAL.IC.IG) RDAT ERASE FILE(DEV.FIL.IMODE) OUTPUT'IS INTENDED TO THE DEV AND FIL ENTERED INPUT'IS INTENDED FROM THE DEV AND FIL ENTERED G ENCOUNTERED C ENCOUNTERED SYNTAX ERROR OR INAPPROPRIATE DEVICE EVERYTHING IS OKAY. CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC COMMON XMIN.XMAX.YMIN.YMAX»DELX.ITYPE.DEVI,DEV2.FILE1.FILE2. IPLOT.IDONE.X;Y.IPST.IBASE.INORM.NTST.ISIG 1 CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCGCC C C C m—mmmm wwmmmmmmmwmmmmmmm GET DATE WORD CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC DUMMY DATE TAD I DATE DCA TEMP TAD TEMP AND (7 DCA lYR TAD TEMP RAR RTR AND (37 DCA {DAY TAD TEMP CLL RAL RTL RTL AND (17 DCA iMO GO TO 1 CPAGE 3 DATE. 6211 7666 TEMP. O IF(IMO)2.2.3 CALL BELL WRITE(1,IOO) GO TO 49 CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC C GET FILE NAMES AND INITIAL VALUES CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC CALL BELL IYRfiIYRka C C 3 IDONE=0 WRITE(1,101) IMO,IDAY.IYR. WRITE( l , 102) CALL YESNO(IVAL) IF(IVAL-89)8,4,8 YMAX30 YMIN=O 116 CRUNCH. CONT. 5 IMODE=1 WRITE(1.103) CALL FILE(DEV1,FILEI,IMODE) IMODE=IMODE+3 GO TO (3.49.5.6) IMODE 6 IMODE= WRITE(1,IO4) CALL F ILE( DEV2 . F ILE2 . IMODE) IMODE=IMODE+3 GO TO (3.49.6.7) IMODE 7 READ(1.103) XMIN.XMAX.DELX 8 WRITE(1.106) CALL LETIN(IVAL.IC.IG) CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC C C SET UP ITYPE FOR BRANCHING C CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC IF(IC-1)9.49,9 9 IF(IG-1)10.3.10 10 IF(IVAL-IO36)11.22.11 11 IF(IVAL-l229)l2.23.l2 12 IF(IVAL-l29)13.24.13 13 IF(IVAL-911)14.25.14 14 IF(IVAL-344)15.26.15 15 IF(IVAL-1042)16.21.16 16 IF(IVAL-l298)l7.20.17 17 IF(IVAL-1225)18.27.18 18 IF(IVAL-1029)8.l9.8 19 FTYPE=9 GO TO 40 2O ITYPE=8 GO TO 40 21 ITYPES? GO TO 40 22 ITYPE=1 GO TO 34 23 ITYPE=2 GO TO 40 24 ITYPE=3 GO TO 40 25 ITYPE=4 GO TO 40 26 ITYPE=5 GO TO 40 27 ITYPE=6 CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC C C SET UP ISIG C CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC 28 WRITE(1.107) CALL LETIN(IVAL.IC.IG) IF(IC-l)29.49,29 30 IF(IVAL-68)31.32.31 31 IF(IVAL-1237)28.33.28 32 ISIG=1 GO TO 40 33 ISIG=2 GO TO 40 CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC C C SET UP IPLOT C CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC 34 WRITE(1.108) CALL LETIN(IVAL.IC.IG) IF(IC-1)35,49,35 117 CRUNCH. CONT. 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 IF(IG-l)36.3,36 IF(IVAL-1236)37.38.37 IF(IVAL-1285)34.39,34 IPLOT?! GO TO 40 IPLOT=2 CALL ERASE CALL RDAT IF(IDONE)4I.4I.49 WRITE(I.109) CALL LETIN(IVAL.IC.IG) IF(IC-1)42.49.42 IF(IG-l)43.4l,43 IF(IVAL-210)44.48.44 IF(IVAL-847)45,46,45 CALL ERASE CALL CHAIN(’MOVE') CALL ERASE CALL CHAIN(’DATCOL’) CALL ERASE GO TO 3 STOP CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC C C C FORMAT STATEMENTS CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 FORMAT( ’ENTER CURRENT DATE AND RESTART PROGRAM’) FORMAT(’ DATE IS ’.2X.I2.’/’.I2.'/197'.I1) FORMATI’ PROGRAM TO CRUNCH RAMAN DATA’//’ DO YOU WANT 1 INITIAL DIALOGUE 7’) FORMAT(’ INPUT FILE ‘) FORMAT(' OUTPUT FILE ’) FORMAT(’ MIN FREQUENCY = ’,F10.4/’ MAX FREQUENCY" '.F10.4/ 1’ SPACING BETWEEN POINTS 3 ’.F10.4) FORMAT(’ OPTIONS FOR THIS RUN AREs'f’ PLOT: SMOOTH: 1 BASELINE CORRECTION: NORMALIZE;’/’ EXPAND: PRINT; TRANSLATE 2 TO E FORMAT: PEAK LOCATE; OR.SIGNAL AVERAGE’/ 3’ WHAT IS YOUR.CHOICE?’) FORMAT(’ ADD OR SUBTRACT? ’) FORMAT(’ STRIP CHART OR TERMINAL7’) FORMAT(’ CRUNCH. MOVE. OR DATCOL ?’) END SUBROUTINE RDAT.FT SUBROUTINE RDAT CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC OOOOOOODOOOOOOOO SUBROUTINE TO READ ONE LINE OF DATA FROMTTHE INPUT FILE AND BRANCH TO THE APPROPRIATE ROUTINE. COMMON VARIABLES USED IBASE BASELINE CORRECTION BRANCHING PARAMETER INORM NORMALIZATION BRANCHING PARAMETER IPST PLOT STARTING BRANCHING PARAMETER DEVI INPUT DEVICE FILEI INPUT FILE X CURRENT FREQUENCY Y CURRENT COUNTS/SEC. XMIN MINIMUM FREQUENCY XMAX' MAXIMUM FREQUENCY YMAX MAXIMUM COUNTS/SEC. RDAT. C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC C C C CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC (ll-1303”“ eunuch 118 CONT. ITYPE BRANCHING PARAMETER IPLOT PLOT BRANCHING PARAMETER IDONE TEST FOR END INTERNAL VARIABLES IPEND FLAG FOR END OF PLOT YSC Y STORAGE FOR NORM B SUM STORAGE FOR BASE NT TOTAL NUMBER OF POINTS READ IN IVAL CHARACTER STORAGE ISTEP NUMBER OF STEPS/POINT ON STRIP CHART IP PLOT TYPE STORAGE SUBROUTINES CALLED IOPEN(DEV.FILE) PLOT(ISTEP) CHAIN BASE(B,NT) NORM(SCALE.YSC) EXPAND SCEND LABEL OCLOSE BELL YESNO(IVAL) PRINT KOHEKIIDUM) PEAKS(XP.YP.NP) STEPHEN M. GREGORY APRIL 12. 1978 CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC COMMON XMIN.XMAX.YMIN.YMAX.DELX.ITYPE.DEVI.DEV2.FILE1.FILE2. 1 IPLOT,IDONE,X.Y.IPST.IBASE.INORM.NTST.ISIG DIMENSION B(6).YSC(5),XDAT(8).YDAT(8),XP(21).YP(21) READ IN DATA POINTS ONE AT A TIME IPEND=0 IBASE=1 INORM;0 IPST%1 ITRAN=1 NP=1 DO 1 1:1,5 YSC Go To 11 9 WHITE (61.103) 103 FORMAT(IHI) D0 10 I=l.N 101F111TE£61.104) AKIS(I),(P(K.I).K=1.J) PLOT. 104 11 142 CONT. FORMAT( 1H .8(3X, E12. 6)) RETURN END SUBROUTINE NORM SUBROUTINE NORM(F,M.NPPS.1CF.SCALE) COMMON P(7.1024) DIMENSION F(4.1024) MLO=ICF-2 MHI=ICF+2 SCALE=0. DO 1 K=MLO.MHI - SCALE=SCALE+F(M.K) SCALE=SCALE/5. DO 2 K?I.NPPS F(M.K)=F(M.K)/SCALE RETURN END SUBROUTINE MINN 3 100 4 SUBROUTINE MINN(M.NPPS) COMMON/SPECT/S(4.1024) COMMON/CONV/C(4.1024).ERROR(4).SCALC(8) COMMON/AMP/SCALE(8).ICF(8).RHO.POLEFF COMMON/SEARCH/XHWDTH.XMSTEP.ISKIP COMMON P(7.1024) DIMENSION X1(4),VT(3) CPOINT=XHWDTH STEP=XMSTEP CTST=0.001 NTIMES=I MORE=0 DO 2 K=1.3 XSTEP=(KF2)*STEP CALL CONVOLV(K.NPPS.CPOINT.XSTEP.ICF(M),M.ISKIP) WT(K)=1. X1(K)=CPOINT¥XSTEP CALL PARABOL(X1.ERROR.PI,P2.P3) X1(4)=-P2/(2.*P1) IFOUR=4 XDIFF=X1(4)-CPOINT CALL CONVOLV(IFOUR.NPPS.CPOINT.XDIFF.1CF(M),M;ISKIP) KFLAG=0 ERRM1N=ERROR(4) DO 3 K=1.3 IF(ERROR(K)-ERRMIN.LE.0) KFLAG=K' IF(ERROR(K)-ERRMIN.LE.0) ERRMIN=ERRDR(K) IF(ABS(XDIFF).LT.CTST) KFLAG=4 CONTINUE STDEV=SQRT(ERROR(4)/FLOAT(NPPS)) WRITE(6I.100) NTIMES.XI(4).STDEV FORMAT(/40X.SHCYCLE.I3.lSHOF SUBROUTINE MINN.//60X;23HTHE MINIMUM 1HALF-NIDTH=.F10.5/60X.23HTHE STANDARD DEVIATION=.E15.9) 1F(KFLAG.NE.0) GO TO 4 CPOINT=X1(4) STEP=STEP/2. NTIMES=NTIMES+1 GO TO 1 IF(MORE.EQ.1.0.KFLAG.EQ.4) GO TO 5 143 MINN. CONT. 101 MORE=1 WRITE (61.101) FORMAT(//36H PROGRAM IS DIVERGING. TRY'DIFFERENT'STARTTNG PARAMETE IRS) CPOINT3XI(KFLAG) STEP=STEP*2. NTIMES=NTIMES+1 GO TO I KALL=1 XDIFF=X1(KFLAG)-CPOINT CALL CONVOLV(KFLAG.NPPS.CPOINT.XDIFF.ICF(M),MgKALL) STDEV=SQRT(ERROR(KFLAG)/FLOAT(NPPS)) WRITE (61.102) NTIMES.X1(KFLAG).STDEV 102 FORMAT(//40X.5HAFTER.13.21HCYCLES THE VALUES ARE.//40X;16HBEST’HAL IF-WIDTH=.F10.5/40X{23HTHE STANDARD DEVIATION=.E15.9) DO 6 I=1,NPPS P(1.I)=S(1,I) P(2.1)=S(M.1) P(3.I)=C(KFLAG,I) CALL PLOT(3.NPPS.4) RETURN END SUBROUTINE INTNCOR 0000 1.: “#6)” 0m“! 01 SUBROUTINE ' Imcom u, NPPS) CORRECTS SPECTRA ACCORDING TO FORMULA I(DEPOL,ACTUAL)=1(DEPOL.EXP)/POLEFF-I(POL.EXP)*RHO COMMON/SPECTVS(4.1024) COMMON/AMP/SCALE(8).ICF(8).RHO.POLEFF.GAIN(8) COMMON P(5.1024).D(1024).REP(1024) RAWDPR=SCALE(M)/SCALE(1) SCALE(M)=SCALE(M)*POLEFF IOFFSET=ICF(1)-ICF(ND ISHIFT=NPPS-IABS(IOFFSET) IF(IOFFSET.EQ.0) GO TO 7 IF(IOFFSET.LT.0) GO TO 4 DO 1 K?1.ISHIFT REP(K}IOFFSET)=S(M.K)-RHO*D(K%IOFFSET)*(SCALE(1)/SCALE(M)) DO 2 K=1.IOFFSET S(M.K)=REP(K}IOFFSET) DO 3 K=1.ISHIFT S(M.K+IOFFSET)=REP(K}IOFFSET) GO TO 9 DO 5 K?1.ISHIFT S(M.K)=S(M.KFIOFFSET)-RHO*D(K)*(SCALE(1)/SCALE(M)) 1UP=ISHIFT+IOFFSET+I DO 6 K?IUP.ISHIFT S(M.KPIOFFSET)=S(M.K) GO TO 9 DO 8 K=1.NPPS S(M.K)=S(M.K)-RHO*D(K)*(SCALE(1)/SCALE(M)) ICF(M)=ICF(I) CALL NORM(S.M.NPPS.ICF(M).SCOR) SCALE(M)=SCALE(M)*SCOR REALDPR=SCALE(M)/SCALE(1) WRITE (61.101) RHO.POLEFF,GAIN(M).IOFFSET.RAWDPR.SCALE(M).REALDPR 101 FORMAT(/32H AFTER INTENSITY CORRECTION WITH.T40.21HPOLARIZATION LE 1AKAGE=.F6.4/T41.19HDETECTOR EFFICENCY2.F5.3/T42.léHRECORDER.GAIN=. 2EII.3/T46.14HCENTER OFFSET=.I3/T34.27HCRUDE DEPOLARIZATION RATIO=. 3F7.5.10X.19HTHE SCALING FACTOR=.E13.7/T74.25HTHE DEPOLARIZATION RA 4TIO=.F7.5) SLOSS=(1.-SCOR)*100. 144 INTNCOR. CONT. 102 FORMAT(///,30H THIS CORRECTION ACCOUNTED FOR. 13.36HPER CENT OF THE 1 TOTAL LINE INTENSITY) LOSS= IFIX( SLOSS) WRITE (61.102) LOSS RETURN END SUBROUTI NE CONVOLV 0000 000 SUBROUTINE CONVOLV( M. NPPS . XHWDTH. XCHNGE. ICF , L. ISKIP) SUBROUTINE CONVOLV CONSTRUCTS A CONVOLUTION OF A LOREN'IZIAN AND THE POLARIZED LINE. AND MATCHES IT TO A DEPOLARIZED LINE DIMENS ION WOR( 3000) . XAXISC 3000) COMMON/SPECT/S( 4 . 1024) COMMON/CONV/C( 4' . 1024) . ERROR( 4) . SCALC( 8) COMMON/DATA/AXIS( 1024) COMMON P( 7 . 1024) NP'I'1‘=1CF*4+40 JJ=1 DEL-‘- AXIS( 2) -AXIS( 1) XAXIS(1)=AXIS(I) NPTTP=NPTT+I DO 1 K= 1 . NP'I'I'P XAXIS( K+ 1) =XAXIS( K) +DEL DO 2 K= l . NPTT J= ICF*2 XJ=XAXIS( K) -XAXIS( J) 2 WOR( K) = 1 ./(1. +( X.I*XJ)/(XH'WDTH+XCHNGE) *32) DO 3 K=1.NPPS 3 C(M.K)=0. 13 S IMPSONS RULE INTEGRATION NS IMPSN=4 NADJ=~2 DO 4- K31 .NPPS. ISKIP DO 4 N=1.NPPS. ISKIP KKK=K+2*ICF-N NS 1 MPSN= NS IMPSN+NADJ COEFF= FLOAT( NS IMPSN) NADJ=-NADJ IF( N. EQ. 1 . O. N. EQ. NPPS) COEFF= 1 . C( M. K) =C( M. K) +WOR( KKK) *S( JJ .N) *COEFF NBSLINE=5=RISKIP IUP= NPPS-4* ISKI P BLCORR=0. DO 5 K=1.NBSL1NE. ISKIP BLCORR= BLCORR+C( M. K) .00 6 K=IUP.NPPS. ISKIP BLCORR=BLCORR+C( M. K) BLCORR= BLCORR/ 10 . DO 7 K: 1. NPPS. ISKIP C( M. K) =C( M. K) -BLCORR YMAX=C(M. I) DO 8 K= 1 .NPPS. ISKIP IF(C(M.IO.LE.YMAX) GO TO 8 YMAX=C( M.K) IRCENT=K CONTINUE IDIFF= IRCENT-ICF IDIFF=( IDIFF/ISKIP)*ISKIP IF( IDIFF)13. 18.14- DO 15 K=1.NPPS. ISKIP 145 CONVOLV. CONT. 15 P(1.K-IDIFF)=C(M.K) IAD=IABS(IDIFF) DO 16 K=I.IAD.ISKIP 16 P(1.K)=P(1.K+IAD) DO 17 K31.NPPS.ISKIP I7 C(M.K)=P(I.K) GO TO 18 14 IOFF=((NPPS-IDIFF)/ISKIP)*ISK1P DO 19 K=I.IOFF.ISKIP I9 C(M.K)=C(M.K+IDIFF) DO 20 K=IOFF.NPPS.ISKIP 20 C(M.K)=C(M.KFIDIFF) 18 IF(ISKIP.EQ.I) GO TO 10 1CENTL=1RCENT52 ICENTH=1RCENT+2 DO 9 K=ICENTL.ICENTH 9 C( M.K)=C(M. IRCENT) GO TO 11 10 IRCENT=ICF 11 CALL NORM(C.M.NPPS.IRCENT.SCALC(M)) ERROR(M)=0. DO 12 KF1.NPPS.ISKIP l2 ERROR(M)=ERROR(M)+(S(L.K)-C(M,IO)*(S(L.K)-C(M.K)) RETURN END SUBROUTINE SMOOTH SUBROUTINE SMOOTH(KK.NPPS) COMMON/SPECT/S(4.1024) COMMON PP(7,1024) DIMENSION P(17) NPPS=NPPS-16 DO 1 K?1.16 I P(K+1)=S(KK.K) DO 3 J=1.NPPS DO 2 K?1.16 2 P(K)=P(K+l) P(17)=S(KK.J+16) SUM=43.*P(9)+42.*(P(8)+P(10))+39.*(P(7)+P(11))+34.*(P(6)+P(12))+27 1*(P(5)+P(13))+18.¥(P(4)+P(14))+7.*(P(3)+P(15))-6.*(P(2)+P(16))-21. 2*(P(1)+P(17)) 3 S(KK.J)=SUM/323. L=NPPS DO 4 K=1.NPPS S(KK.L+8)=S(KK,L) 4 L=L-1 DO 5 K?l.8 J=NPPS+8+K§1 L=NPPS+K-1 5 S(KK.J)=S(KK.L) NPPS=NPPS+I6 RETURN END SUBROUTINE PARABOL SUBROUTINE PARABOL(X.V.A.B.C) COMMON P(7.1024) DIMENSION X(3).V(3).Y(3).ERROR(3).ERRSQ(3) NR1TE(61.100) 146 .PARABOL. com. 100 101 102 103 104 FORMAT(1H1.T24.68HSUBROUTINE PARABOL FITS 3 POINTS TO THE' PARABOLI 1C CURVE Y= AX**2+BX+C) TM1=(X'(1)-X(2))$(V(2)-V(3)) TP12=(X(2)-X(3))*(V( l)-V(2)) ALPHA=-TMI+TMZ BETA=TMI*( X( I) +X( 2) )-TMZ*( X( 2)+X( 3)) D=-(X(1)-X(2))*(X(2)-X(3))*(X(3)-X(1)) 1F(ALPHA.EQ.0.0) ALPHA=1.0E-20 1F(D.EQ.0.0) D=1.0E-20 A=ALPHA/D B=BETA/D‘ C=V(1)-A*X(1)*X(1)-B*X(1) WRITE(61.101) A.B.C FORMAT(///20X. 12HCOEFFICIEN'IS//20X.4HA = .EI3.7/20X.4HB = .E13.7/2 10X. 4H0 = .E13.7) CHISQ=0. WRITE( 61 . 102) FORMAT( /// 10X. 7HRESULTS//15X. 8HVARIABLE. T30 . 14HEXPERIM. VALUE. T45 . I I2HTHEOR. VALUE. T60. IOHI)IFFERENCE.T73. 13HDIFF. SQUARED) DO 1 K=1.3 Y(K)=A*X(K)*X(K)+B*X(K)+C ERROR(K)=Y(K)-V(K) ERRSQ( K) =ERROR( K) *ERROR( K) CHISQ= CHISQ+ERRSQ( K) WRITE(6I. 103) X(K) .V(K) .Y(K) .ERROR(K).ERRSQ(K) FORMAT(14X.E13.7.T32.E13.7.T46,EI3.7.T59.E13.7.'175.E13.7) WRITE(61.104) CHISQ FORMAT(//10X. 26H’1‘OTAL CHI SQUARED VALUE = .E13.7) RETURN END SUBROUTINE BASE 000 0000 200 201 2 SUBROUTINE BASE(N. X. Y,C) THIS SUBROUTINE FINDS THE BEST STRAIGHT LINE THROUGH N POINTS COMMON P(7,1024) DIMENSION X( 1024) .Y( 1024) .C(3) WRITE(61.200) N FORMAT (1H1.T10.42HSUBROUTINE BASE FITTING A STRAIGHT LINE T0 , 1I4. 12H DATA POINTS//) SX=0. SY=0. SX2=0. SXY=0. SX=SUMOFALLX. SY=SUMOFALLY. SX2=SUMOFALLX=RX. SXY '-' SUM OF ALL X$Y DO 1 I=I.N SX=SX+X( I) SY=SY+Y( I) SXY=SXY+X( I)*Y( 1) SXZ=SX2+X( I):KX( I) FN=FLOAT( N) D'-' FN*SX2-SX*SX C( 1)=(FN>¢=SXY-SX$SY) /D C(2) =(SXL’*S‘I-SX*SXY) /D WRITE(61.201) (NN.C( NN) .NN=I.2) FORMAT( //10X. I2HCOEFFICIENTS./( T1 1 .*C(*, 12, *) = $.E15.9)) H=0. DO 2 I=1.N YC=C(1)*X(1)+C(2) H=H+(Y( I)-YC)*(Y( I)-YC) 147 BASE. CONT. STDEV=SQRT(H/(FN-2.)) WRITE(61.202) H.STDEV 202 FORMAT(/4X.26HTOTAL CHI SQUARED VALUE 3 .E15.9//9X.21HSTANDARD DEV 21ATION = .E15.9/) RETURN END APPENDIX E TEST ROUTINE A test routine to be input with the switch register on a PDP 8 minicomputer that is designed to troubleshoot the two counters in the Ramn interface. 148 149 LOW COUNTER,TEST PROGRAM 0200 0201 0202 0203 0204 0205 0206 0207 0210 0211 0212 7300 6601 6606 6602 6604 6612 7300 6617 6605 5204 7402 /CLEAR AC AND LINK ICLEAR RAMAN COUNTER /CLEAR LOW OVERFLOW /START COUNTING /LATCH COUNTER /SAMPLE LOW COUNT /CLEAR.AC AND LINK /DRIVE INTO AC /CHECK LON OVERFLOW /GO TO 204 /HALT HIGH COUNTER.TEST PROGRAH 0200 0201 0202 0203 0204 0205 0206 0207 0210 0211 0212 7300 6601 6611 6602 6604 6613 7300 6617 6607 5204 7402 /CLEAR AC AND LINK /CLEAR RAMAN COUNTER /CLEAR.HIGH OVERFLOW /START COUNTING /LATCH COUNTER /SAHPLE HIGH COUNT /CLEAR AC AND LINK /DRIVE INTO AC /CHECK HIGH OVERFLOW /GO TO 204 /HALT LIST OF REFERENCES 10 J. 11 F‘ 12 .3 13 E3 14 M. 15 J. 16 17 S. 18 B. 19 20 J. 21 P. 22 . B LIST OF REFERENCES . J. Bartoli and T. A. Litovitz, J. Chem. Phys., 39, 404 (1972). I. Cukier, J. Chem. Phys., 39, 734 (1974). . J. Bulkin and K. Brezinsky, J. Chem. Phys., 32, 15 (1978). . Kelker, Mol. Cryst. Liq. Cryst., 33, 1 (1973). . H. Brown, American Scientist, 30, 64 (1972). . w. Gray, Mol. Cryst., _1_, 333 (1966). L. Erickson, M01. Cryst. Liq. Cryst., Z, 153 (1969). . Franklin, Mol. Cryst. Liq. Cryst., 33, 227 (1971). Wadati and A. Isihara, M01. Cryst. Liq. Cryst., 31, 95 (1972). H. Freed, J. Chem. Phys., 93, 4183 (1977). A. Cotter, M01. Cryst. Liq. Cryst., 32, 173 (1977). A. Cotter, J. Chem. Phys., 33, 1098 (1977). A. Cotter, J. Chem. Phys., 33, 4710 (1977). A. Cotter, J. Chem. Phys., 31, 4268 (1977). M. Schnur, Mol. Cryst. Liq. Cryst., 33, 155 (1973). . Priestley and P. S. Pershan, Mol. Cryst. Liq. Cryst., 33, 369 (1973). Jen, N. A. Clark, P. S. Pershan, and E. P. Priestley, J. Chem. Phys., 33, 4635 (1977). J. Bulkin, Applied Spectroscopy, 39, 261 (1976). . W. Gray and A. Mosley, M01. Cryst. Liq. Cryst., 33, 71 (1976). Fisher and A. G. Fredrickson, Mol. Cryst. Liq. Cryst., 3, 267 (1969). Martinoty and S. Candau, Mol. Cryst. Liq. Cryst., 33, 243 (1971). Ch. Gahwiller, Mol. Cryst. Liq. Cryst., 32, 301 (1973). 23 J. Wahl and F. Fischer, Mol. Cryst. Liq. Cryst., 33, 359 (1973). 150 24 F. 25 H. 26 R. 27 P. 28 M. 29 P. 30 P. 31 P. 32 L. 33 Y. 34 A. 35 P. 36 R. 37 38 F. 39 R. 40 H. 41 M. 42 N. 43 C. 44 M. 45 D. E.' 151 Brochard, Mol. Cryst. Liq. Cryst., 33, 51 (1973). Gruler and G. Meier, M01. Cryst. Liq. Cryst., 33, 261 (1973). 8. Porter, C. Griffen, and J. F. Johnson, Mol. Cryst. Liq. Cryst., 33, 131 (1974). G. DeGennes, Mol. Cryst. Liq. Cryst. Lett., 3, 91 (1976). C. Kim, S. Park, Sr. M. Cooper, and S. V. Letcher, Mol. Cryst. Liq. Cryst., 33, 143 (1976). P. Karat and N. V. Madhusudana, Mol. Cryst. Liq. Cryst., 33, 51 (1976). P. Karat and N. V. Madhusudana, Mol. Cryst. Liq. Cryst., 33, 239 (1977). P. Karat and N. V. Madhusudana, Mol. Cryst. Liq. Cryst., 32, 21 (1978). Bota, A. Buka, and G. Molnar, Mol. Cryst. Liq. Cryst., 33, 155 (1977). Kawamura and S. Iwayanagi, M01. Cryst. Liq. Cryst., 33, 239 (1977). E. White, P. E. Cladis, and S. Torza, Mol. Cryst. Liq. Cryst., 33, 13 (1977). G. DeGennes, The Physics of Liquid Crystals (Claredon Press, Oxford, 1974). G. Gordon, J. Chem. Phys., 33, 3658 (1965). B. Wilson, Jr., J. C. Decius, and P. C. Cross, Molecular Vibrations (McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York, 1955). J. Bartoli and T. A. Litovitz, J. Chem. Phys., 33, 413 (1972). G. Gordon, J. Chem. Phys., {9, 1973 (1964). Shimizu, J. Chem. Phys., 33, 2453 (1965). E. Rose, Elementary Theory of Angular Momentum (John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, 1957). Bloembergen, E. M. Purcell, and R. V. Pound, Phys. Rev., Z3, 679 (1948). M. Hu and R. Zwanzig, J. Chem. Phys., 33, 4354 (1974). Fury and J. Jonas, J. Chem. Phys., 33, 2206 (1976). R. Jones, C. H. Wang, D. H. Christensen, and P. A. Lund, J. Chem. Phys., 31, 399 (1977). 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 S3 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 152 . W. McGaughy, S. Y. C. Wu, and B. M. Fung, J. Chem. Phys., 32, 473 (1978). . T. Hynes, R. Kapral, and M. Weinberg, J. Chem. Phys., 32, 2725 (1978). . L. Whittenburg and C. H. Wang, J. Chem. Phys., 33, 4255 (1977). . R. Alms, D. R. Bauer, J. I. Brauman, and R. Pecora, J. Chem. Phys., 33, 5570 (1973). . R. Alms, D. R. Bauer, J. I. Brauman, and R. Pecora, J. Chem. Phys., 33, 5310 (1973). . R. Bauer, G. R. Alms, J. I. Brauman, and R. Pecora, J. Chem. Phys., 3;, 2255 (1974). . A. Assink and J. Jonas, J. Chem. Phys., 31, 3329 (1972). . D. Gierke and W. H. Flygare, J. Chem. Phys., 33, 2231 (1974). . Dendramis, Ph.D. Thesis, Michigan State University, 1976. . G. Whitfield, Ph.D. Thesis, Michigan State University, 1977. . T. Bulmer, D. E. Irish, F. W. Grossman, G. Herriot, M. Tseng, and A. J. Weerheim, Appl. Spectrosc., 32, 506 (1975). . F. Edgell, E. Schmidlin, T. J. Kuriakose, and P. Lurix, Appl. Spectrosc., 39, 428 (1976). . Kint, R. H. Elskan, and J. R. Scherer, Appl. Spectrosc., 33, 281 (1976). . Gans and J. B. Gill, Appl. Spectrosc., 33, 451 (1977). . J. Darland, Ph.D. Thesis, Michigan State University, 1978. . C. Wenke, Ph.D. Thesis, Michigan State University, 1972. . P. Shoemaker and C. W. Garland, Experiments in Physical Chemistry (McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York, 1962). . Sovitzky and M. J. E. Golay, Anal. Chem., 33, 1627 (1964). . G. Enke and T. A. Nieman, Anal. Chem., 33, 705A (1976). . A. Wright, Ph.D. Thesis, Michigan State University, 1976. . Morrison, Groundingiand Shielding Techniques in Instrumentation, 2nd Ed. (John WiIey and Sons, Inc., New York, 1977). 153 67p. van Konyenburg and W. A. Steele, J. Chem. Phys., 33, 4776 (1972). 68W. G. Rothschild, G. J. Rosasco, and R. C. Livingston, J. Chem. Phys., 32, 1253 (1975). 696. D. Patterson and J. E. Griffiths, J. Chem. Phys., 33, 2406 (1975). 70L. C. Rosenthal and H. L. Strauss, J. Chem. Phys.,-31, 282 (1976). 71G. W. Gray, K. J. Harrison, J. A. Nash, J. Constant, D. S. Hulme, J. Kinton, and E. P. Raynes, Liquid Cry§tals and Ordered Fluids (Ed. J. F. Johnson and R. 5. Porter) Plenum Press, New York, 1974, p. 617. 72B. K. Sudashiva and G. S. R. Subba Rao, Mol. Cryst. Liq. Cryst., 33, 345 (1977). 73 N. B. Colthup, L. H. Daly, and S. E. Wiberley, Introduction to Infrared and Raman Spectroscqpy, 2nd Edition, Academic Press, Inc., New York, 1975, p. 65. 74S. L. Meyer, Data Analysis for Scientists and Engineers, John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, 1975, p. 279. 75w. G. Rothschild, J. Chem. Phys., 93, 455 (1976). 76J. H. Campbell, J. F. Fisher, and J. Jonas, J. Chem. Phys., 33, 346 (1974). 77D. R. Jones and C. H. Wang, J. Chem. Phys., 33, 1659 (1977). 78 A. J. Leadbetter, J. L. A. Durrant, and M. Rugman, Mol. Cryst. Liq. Cryst., 33, 231 (1975). 79K. T. Gillen and J. H. Noggle, J. Chem. Phys., 33, 801 (1970). 80A. Gierer and K. Wirtz, Z. Natureforsch., 33, 532 (1953). 815. B. Dubin, N. A. Clark, and G. B. Benedek, J. Chem. Phys., 33, 5158 (1971). 82J. W. Bridges, P. J. Creaven, and R. T. Williams, Biochem. J., 23, 872 (1965). 83A. B. Harvey, Anal. Chem., 32, 905A (1978). 84J. R. Mehaffey, private communication. 855. W. Provencher, Biophysical J., 33, 27 (1976). 154 86S. W. Provencher, J. Chem. Phys., 33, 2772 (1976). 87J. E. Griffiths, Vibrational Spectra and Structure, Volume 6 (Ed. J. R. Durig) Elsevier Scientific Publishing Company; Amsterdam, 1977, p. 295.