"web-'5 h LIBRARY Michigan Sum 1| gum"; Illjljjlfllll Lm in (l H! in “Ill 1m l l n , This is to certify that the thesis entitled THEA MUSGRAVE'S EQBN CONCERTO presented by C. SCOTT SMITH has been accepted towards fulfillment of the requirements for Wane in MUSIC gm é WWW} Major professor DateFebruary 13. 1980 04639 THEA MUSGRAVE'S HORN CONCERTO By Charles Scott Smith A THESIS Submitted to Michigan State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF MUSIC Department of Music 1980 ABSTRACT THEA MUSGRAVE'S HORN CONCERTO By Charles Scott Smith Although Thea Musgrave has achieved an international reputation as a composer, neither she nor her music is known in many circles in the United States. By way of an intro— duction, a biographical sketch of her life and a listing of her works are included. The writer selected the Horn Concerto as a work for de— tailed study for two reasons: first, a profound interest in the art of horn playing, and second, a desire to examine in detail a significant work for the horn that was written in the 20th Century. A study of the Concerto's formal design and an analysis of the linear and vertical structures that are contained within it, make up the main body of the work. As an adjunct to this, it seemed appropriate, because of the extensive use of quarter-tones in the solo horn part, to include research about quarter-tones as they relate to horn playing. In Memorium: W. Leigh Smith ii ACWOWLEDGMENTS I wish to eXpress sincere gratitude to the following professors: Dr. Douglas Campbell and Neill Sanders, for insight in Horn performance; Dr. David Liptak, for his teaching of musical synthesis; and especially Dr. Russell Friedewald, whose guidance has been most inSpiring in musical analysis and its presentation. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS LiSt Of Tables 0 o ooooo o ooooo o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o u o o c o o o o o o o o o .V-Vi LiSt Of Figures 0 o o o o o o o o o I o o o o o o o o o 0000000 o o o o o o o o I Vii-Viii IUtI‘OdUC'tiOI’I o o o o o o o o o o o o a o o o o o a o o o o I o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o O 1 Chapter 1 -- Biography .00000...........OOOOOOOOOIOOOOOOOOu Chapter 2 --- Formal Analysis ......... ................. ... 7 Chapter 3 —-" Linear AnalySiS o o o o o a o o o a I o o c o 0 o o o o o o o o o o I o 17 Aleatoric Features I o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o I 0 21‘" Solo Horn Features .......... ...... .... ....... ........ 28 Chapteru---Vertical StI‘UCtureS Deco-00000000000000.0000 33 Appendix A -—- Derivation of Quarter-Tones ............... #1 Appendix B --- Thea Musgrave's Works (1953-1977) ......... 56 Ballets .............................................. 56 Operas ............................................ 56-57 Orchestral Works .................................. 57-58 Chamber Music ..................................... 59-60 Vocal and Choral with Orchestra ...................... 61 Unaccompanied Choral Music ........................ 61-62 Music for Young People and Amateurs .................. 62 Concert Band Music ................................... 63 Songs ................................................ 63 Piano Music .......................................... 63 List OfReferenceS .....OOOOOOOOOOOOCOO...IOOIOOOOIOO..... 64 iv LIST OF TABLES Table II-l Similarities of Descending Scale Patterns Using Basic Interval Successions ..................... 16 Table IV-l ............................................... 35 Table IV-2 ............................................... 36 Table IV-3 ............................. ..... ............. 37 Table IV-ha Piano Structures In The Misterioso ................... 37 Table IV-hb Harp Structures In The Misterioso .................... 38 Table IV-5 ............................................ 38-u0 Table A—I F Horn Fingerings and Harmonic Series in FHomPitCh .0.........OCOOO0.0.0.0..........OOOOCCOO ”a Table A-II B-Flat Horn Fingerings and Harmonic Series inFHorn PitCh .0......00...........IIOOOOOOOOOOIOOOO as Table A—III A Horn Fingerings and Harmonic Series in FHomPitCh .00....00.0.0000...0.000000000000000.....1+6 Table A-IV High f Horn Fingerings and Harmonic Series inFHomPitCh .0......IOIOOIOOIOOIOOOIOOOOOOOOOOO... “’7 Table A-V High e Horn Fingerings and Harmonic Series inFHomPitCh ......OOOOOOOOIOOOOOOI.....IOOOOIOI... 2+8 Table A-VI Just and Equal Temperament Frequencies and Tested and Calculated Quarter-Tones in Cycles Per Second on Horns in F, A, B-Flat, High f, and High e in Written F Horn Pitch ........ 50-52 LIST OF TABLES Table A-VII Fingerings for Accurate Quarter—Tones .. ...... ........ 53 Table A—VIII Quarter-Tone Fingerings for the F/B-Flat DOUbleHorn 00......00.......OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO 51"" Table A-IX Quarter—Tone Fingerings for the B-Flat (A)/ High f (8) Double Descant ..O.......'................. 55 vi LIST OF FIGURES Figure II—l IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII7 Figure II-Z IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII8 Figure II-3 Formal Analysis: Measures 5—8 ......................... 9 Figure II-h Formal Analysis: Measures 1h-19 ...................... 10 Figure II-5 Formal Structure of the Misterioso ................... 11 Figure II-6a Return of Material from the Andante Espressivo ....... 12 Figure II-6b Return of Material from the Andante Espressivo ....... 13 Figure 11-7 completeQuOte IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII 114' Figure III-1 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII17 Figure III-2 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII18 Figure III-3 Categoryone IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII19 Figure IIIDL‘f cocoo-0.0coo-00000000000000.00-oooooooooooooo 19 Figure III-5 categoryTwo IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII20 Figure III-6 (a, b, & C) I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 21 Figure III—7 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 21 Figure III-8 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 22 Figure III-9 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII 22 vii Figure Figure Figure Figure Figure Boxed Notation Inside Repeat Signs ...... Figure Figure Figure Figure Figure Figure Figure Figure Figure Figure III-10 III-11 III-12 III—13 III—14 III-15 III-l6 III-17 III-18 III—19 III—20 III-21 III-22 III-23 III-2H LIST OF FIGURES IIIII 23-24 . . . . .. ....... 2h .. . . ............ 25 ... 25 .... 26 .. 27-28 ............. 27 28 .... 28 ... 29 000 29 .............. 29 .............3o ... 31 Solo Horn Answered By Different Pitches ............. 32 Figure Figure Figure A—I IV-1 IV-2 c Figure A-II . Figure A-III Quarter-Tone Fingerings From Every Seventh and Eleventh Harmonic Fingering in Written F Horn PitCh IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII “'3 viii ......... 33 IIIII 31+ IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII.IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII [4'2 INTRODUCTION At the "Horn Fandango" at Western Michigan University, February 16, 1979, the writer interviewed Barry Tuckwell, hornist, who was there as guest soloist and clinician. Af— ter a two-hour lecture-recital, Tuckwell entertained questions about Thea Musgrave's Horn Concerto. The work was commissioned by Mario di Bonaventura for Barry Tuckwell and the Hopkins Center Congregation of the Arts Festival at Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire. When asked what kind of piece he wanted, Tuckwell requested that it be for horn and strings. The resultant concerto requires piccolo, flute, oboe, Cor anglais, B-flat clarinet, bass clarinet, bassoon, contrabassoon, four horns (plus three optional extra horns), two trumpets, tenor trombone, prepared piano, celesta, harp, strings, and the following percussion: suspended cymbals: high, medium, and low: two pairs of maracas: tam-tam; side drum: three sizes of tom-toms: conga drum; and Vibraphone. Tuckwell suggested that the concerto contain quarter— tone scales - he had heard these scales on a Don Ellis recording (possibly Ellis' Haiku album). One inspiration for the concerto was a postcard Tuckwell sent Musgrave from Tula, Mexico. He said the postcard, showing four figures 1 around a central figure, reminded him of the four horn players in the Tula Symphony. This inspiration developed into one part of the work where three horns play at different corners around the hall, creating four points around the soloist. The only adjustment made after the piece was written involved the first horn off stage at measures 82-85. Origin- ally, Musgrave wanted the first horn stopped, but after the first rehearsal, it was discovered that the sound did not carry. The part was then changed from stopped to open. Tuckwell pointed out that the last note in the solo part, a concert f, should be a concert bl-flat. Tuckwell played the concerto approximately twenty times since the work's completion in 1971, and he said that he still receives requests for its performance. Before leaving the interview, Tuckwell stated that Thea Musgrave was an excellent conductor. Below are two reviews of the Horn Concerto; the first is from Music and Musicians, November, 1971, Volume 20, No. 3, page 58, and the second, from Musical Opinion, Septem- ber, 1971, No. 1123, Volume 9h, page 607. The linguistic confusion which vitiated the nocturnal attractions of Thea Musgrave's Horn Concerto, given its first Prom performance by Barry Tuckwell and the Scottish National Orchestra under the composer on August 9, was less overt but more radical. The idea of superimposing mu81cal ideas that are contrasted both in substance and tempo certainly offers a viable, if arduous means of constructing a long single movement. What the composer appears not to have noticed is its most insidious danger ---the unwitting arousal of conflict between fundamentally opposed concepts of sound perception. Between (on one side) the progressive mode of musical discourse of the great classics with its demand for an answering effort of active thought on the part of the listener, and (on the other) the additive presentation of sound for its own sake---requiring, as Boulez put it in a programme note a few days earlier, '... a contemplative attitude... a different way of listening, attentive to what is happening within the resonance itself' --- initially made available to western music through the agency of Debussy. In the Musgrave Concerto, neither approach is fully re- alized in its own terms, but each serves continually to interfere with the operation of the other (a pervasive sense of indecision in the work's forward momentum is only the most obvious symptom) so that the impact of the so-called 'dramatic-abstract' elements---the stereo- phonic perambulation of the brass players---is correspond- ingly weakened. ...The core of this concert (August 9, 1971) was the horn concerto of Thea Musgrave. Barry Tuckwell was listed as soloist, but since there were at least four or more horns around the R.A.H. as well as a couple of trumpets and a trombone, it was more a new adventure in concertante writing. For one thing, Thea Musgrave, who also conducted, has never hidden her devotion to Charles Ives and she used his trick of contrasting sonorities both within her orchestra and with the help of the peripatetic brass. There was more than a suggestion of the best of that rare commodity, good electronic music in the sound quality, which ebbed and flowed in the same manner already familiar to the followers of Lutoslawski. The brass suggested the hunt in the forest-—-or as it suggests here the quest. Voices both of the soloist and orchestra are both intri- cate and varied, and the whole should be quickly heard again. But one does wonder how the piece will be housed in the Festival Hall without upsetting cash customers in the boxes and circle. Perhaps if it finds itself into a programme of late Bruckner or Mahler it could make economic as well as more interesting musical sense. It is the hope of this writer that this analysis will lend insight into the Horn Concerto's musical contents. Unless stated differently, all french horn examples are notated in concert pitch. All the musical examples in this thesis are used through the permission of MagnaMusic-Baton, Inc., St. Louis, Missouri: The Musgrave/Horn Concerto Copyright by J&W Chester, London, 1974. CHAPTER 1 BIOGRAPHY Thea Musgrave, born on May 27, 1928 in Edinburgh, Scotland, is recognized as a successful composer, accom— panist, and conductor. In the last two decades, many of her ballets, operas, music for television and films, chamber, choral, and orchestral works have been commissioned (see Appendix B). She has received the Donald Francis Tovey and Lili Boulanger Memorial prizes, the Koussevitzky Award (1973), and a Guggenheim Fellowship (1974-1975). Performances of her works by the BBC and at the Edinburgh International Festival in the early 1950's opened the road to other European music festivals such as the Warsaw Autumn, Zagrieb, Cheltenham, Aldenburgh, Florence Maggio Musicale, and Venice Biennale. Her guest conducting appearances include concerts with the BBC Scottish Orchestra, London Symphony, English Chamber Orchestra, and world premiere performances of her own works with the English Opera Group and Scottish National Orchestra. Musgrave's formal education at Edinburgh University (19h7-51) includes harmony and analysis with Mary Grierson and counterpoint and music history with Hans Gal. From 1952 - 195M, she studied accompaning under Nadia Boulanger at the Paris Conservatory. Ms. Boulanger has inspired many famous American Composers including Virgil Thompson, Aaron Copland, Roy Harris, Walter Piston, and Roger Sessions. Lyricism, made up of chromatic constructions, is a main feature of her most recent instrumental works, such as the Horn Concerto, Clarinet Concerto, Night Music, and Memento Vitae. She composed many of these works in a "drama- tic-abstract" form; the drama stems from theatrical elements, and, since there is no restricting "programme" (program music is usually written from a non-musical idea: musical pieces in this genre depict people or events) within, the works have an abstract nature. For example, in the Clarinet Concerto, the soloist at different intervals joins smaller groups within sections of the orchestra which play in op- position to the conductor. She has taught at London University (Great Britain) and the University of California, and served on various committees, including: the Central Music Advisory Panel for the BBC, Music Panel for the Arts Council of Great Britain, Executive Committee of the Composer's Guild of Great Britain, and the Committee of Awards for the Commonwealth Fund of New York. She is married to Peter Mark, a conductor and violist, and they live in Santa Barbara, California. As an eXperienced lecturer in the U.S.A. and U.K., she shares her thoughts about composition with others. Here are her comments about the concerto as an art form: The idea of a concerto fascinates me. Many of my recent works have been concertos, for this is the form that lends itself to the kind of dramatic eXploration that stimulates me. Several works have a theatrical element where I use the players almost as a 'dramatis personae.‘ This is really just an extension of the 6 concerto principle. I remember being struck by a remark of Tovey's which I read as a student. He describes how the basic idea of a concerto arises from the original meaning of the Latin word "concertus" from "certare," to strive: strive, in the sense of balancing unequal forces --solo or soli versus tutti, or to put it in another way, individuals versus the crowd. The crowd can dominate by sheer force and can easily out balance the soloist, but the soloist has the advantage of greater virtuosity, ly- ricism, and rubato. CHAPTER 2 FORMAL ANALYSIS In the shadow of Thea Musgrave's Horn Concerto hides the traditional sonata-related concerto form: but within its structure, the signification of her presentation of a concerto is revealed. Even though the loose structure suggests that she had the traditional concerto form in mind, it would be presumptuous to say that her work follows such a form strictly. In the first forty—nine measures, the principal material in- volves a series of exchanges between orchestra and solo horn. This material is developed in the next seventy-five measures, and leads into a transitional section of niney-two measures, which forebodes a return to some of the previously stated ideas. The return, or recapitulation, sixty-one measures long, is followed by a seventeen-measure coda. FIGURE II-l l 1 I ll J I O principal 49 development 125 transitional 218 return 279295 material of section of coda principal ‘ some material principal ideas This return, which is preceded by a solo horn cadenza (measure 217), creates an arch contour. The synthesis of ideas, improvisatory in nature and lacking regular phrase structure, is presented rhapsodically within the arch. FIGURE II-2 _fl_____———————""”_——-——.——.——flfl_fl——— P__““‘~F“\~ O 217 295 The sections as outlined in Figure 11-1, are labeled by the composer. The first, (measures 1 to #9) bears the in- scription: Misterioso: come un sogno,d’=48 circa ma con ru- batq. It is in this section, that the traditional concerto approach is suggested, for principal material is shared in a series of exchanges between the tutti orchestra, individual members, and solo horn. For example, in measures 1-9, a tutti orchestral introduction (Ia) leads to a descending bass clarinet scale pattern. The first solo horn statement (Ib) is made up of two phrases: the first (measures 5 and 6) begins with the last note of a descending scale pattern, and the second (measures 7 and 8) follows two statements from the contrabassoon and bassoon. The first orchestral res- ponse, Ia' (measures 8-19) precedes a second solo horn state- ment, Ib' (measure In) which precedes another descending bass clarinet scale pattern. Like Ia and lb, Ia' and Ib' involve a series of exchanges. The second orchestral response, Ic (measures 18-20) initiates a third series of exchanges, Id (measures 21-h0) until the climactic moment for the solo horn in measure #0. The Misterioso comes to a close with what might be called an unsettled codetta that links the Misterioso with the second section. \r. \11/ sh (- . ea. c um: .e‘ mum mmmbmfis "meNHEéw Qéom MIHH mmDUHm 10 9 I - Nifl h ‘u a H < \l/mI“ AAA: _ l.» - “first 5% _ _ »— N r K ' \§ r .F~ C “R8 :6 §$Uxfi L “ ~- u a. .N- :8 .E “ ‘ A A .3. £§§Q h N- :4 I EN — uV \— hax $£.Q < maldfi mmmbm I ||I‘\. L. ...... e ) ) , L .n a t w _.l N WM 4 u E” Nq N AH h "f d S-QA L 1 uwxxx .lnm1L we: Rb; h! l N l N ‘1 II _ um um [.mr n H- . alt..:‘.!2¢lllun=:.i...-u F... . . IFEEVII'L_ mmfi-mQM1uomm-mHN .ss O>Hmmmmmmm mezmmBzH on ’fl*>fif 30 horn players will either "lip" or "bend" a note somewhere in a small register (Figure III-21), or play a combination of half-valves and bend the resulting tone to create a slowly rising and falling pitch. On the recording (Decca - "Mus- grave Horn Concerto," 1973) , Barry Tuckwell executes this sound with minor lip pressure and a change of lip tension. The Horn Concerto might be the first to eXplore exten- sively quarter-tone scales on the horn. Theoretically, it is possible for one to lower a pitch a quarter-step by partially hand stopping or lessening lip tension. A more accurate method utilizes the out—of—tune harmonics already located in the acoustical structure of the instrument. With the seventh. eleventh. and thirteenth harmonics approximately a quarter-tone flat. there exists many fingering combinations on the double horn (see Appendix A for a detailed analysis of these scales and fingerings). Figure III-22 illustrates one of these scales and the fingering pattern sequence as it appears in the score. FIGURE III-22 Solo Horn: m. 250: nx””"'—i _____~___‘~“-““\\ ADUB: ‘0 8&1........,. & t ‘, 1'o;!z£§ 1o {32; 1%? One of the theatrical moments in the Horn Concerto 31 involves the interplay between the soloist and four members of the horn section. Measures 233 and 243-249. where the orchestral horn players are placed around the soloist, are reminiscent of the Scherzo in Gustav Mahler's fifth symphony, in which there are eight measures where each horn player in turn plays a concert f with a bell attack. In the ngn Concerto. the soloist plays a concert g that is answered in turn by successive orchestral horns at the same pitch as in measure 233, and at different pitches, as in measure 243. FIGURE III-23 Solo Horn and Horns I, II, III, * IV; Inc 233: f* . n IE] I :0 0.. 6.... .Ivo ha («5) If}: f F” +0 32 FIGURE III-24 Solo Horn Answered By Different Pitches Solo Horn and Horns I, II, III. & IV: mm. 243-244: '0 ('5') 6% v 8? In summary, Musgrave explores some means and extremes for the horn soloist. Unlike some twentieth century works for the horn, the Horn Concerto does not include any per- cussive sounds that require tapping the instrument or any chordal writing which requires simultaneous humming and playing. CHAPTER 4 VERTICAL STRUCTURES A study of the vertical structures in the Horn Concerto has shown that an approach which uses Roman Numerals and at- tempts to identify functional harmonic progressions is not appropriate: instead, a number system whose roots lie in set—theory principles1 reveals more accurately the relation- ships that exist. All structures are reduced to the base of C in all of the tables in this chapter. and all number se- quences begin with zero: this places all the pitches in a given vertical structure in the smallest possible interval. For example, in Figure IV-l. the notes c. d-flat, and e-flat are labeled as 0.1.3: the minor third or augmented second is the smallest possible interval in which these tones can be placed. In the same figure, the notes f#. g. and a are identi- FIGURE IV-l (0.1.3) (0.1.3) fied as 6. 7. and 9. To reduce these to a base of zero, one 1Set theory in musical analysis is a system of assign- ing numbers to the universal set of notes. For convenience. 0:0.C#=1.d=2.d#=3.e=4uf=5.f#=6.g=7. g# = 8, a = 9, a# = 10, and b = 11. For further information, see Allen Forte's Structure of Atonal Music: Part I: Pitch- Class Sets and Relations, P. 1 -’83. 33 34 subtracts 6 from all three numbers, which equates to O, 1. and 3. Thus, both examples in Figure IV-1 are made up of the same intervals when reduced. This chapter provides a location, reduction, and tabulation of all the vertical structures in the Horn Concerto: the final tabulations reveal the most common vertical intervals. In the Misterioso, vertical structures occur independently in woodwinds, strings. piano. and harp: (no brass is used in this section and only indefinite pitched percussion instru- ments are used). In measure thirty, the woodwinds and strings play together, but since the woodwind chord lasts one and a half beats, the two choirs sound separately. FIGURE IV-2 Woodwinds and Strings: m. 30: fl. ob a. Vertical structures fall into two catagories: those that punctuate the texture (essentially woodwinds), and those that provide a background (strings). In the Misterioso, most woodwind chords answer solo-horn statements: Table IV-1 35 illustrates the reduced sets of all woodwind structures in this section. TABLE IV-l Structure: Measure Number: Number of Occurrences: (0.1.4.7) 8 1 (0.1.5.8) 18, 21, 22. 24. 5 30 (0.2.5.6) 39 1 (0.2.3.6) 4O 1 (0.1.3.4) 40 1 (0.1.3.4.8) 41-43 1 (0,1.2,4,5,6) 44—46 1 (0.1.2.5) 40 1 One predominant background vertical structure that first appears in measure 4, is a C minor-major ninth chord. This chord "functions" only as a textural sonority and is analyzed numerically as: (0.1.3.4.8). FIGURE IV-3 Violas & Cellos: m. 4: I< mqmI< mqmI< mAmI¢ mgmfia 54 zmom mHmaon H-< NHNHH NoHNmHMMOMNJNOEOQNNENJNHrHHojm NW” J J Idflkw \r U Qwfllqmfi Uuqn q¢¢niqufi AVA Q q I. IIHIHS ngllfffr 1:1: 1: m m N m H o m N m .Lm H o m N m H o m N m H m o m N .mmHm 1 H11 191 URN“... IUDLfi.UDm~HQ .l ..Ilifl HTHIJHHI HHHH 1.1L HHIH a 55 1 111.11 A 13 q 17 .1 111 1 Ll; 1: I I II. ”.mNEOMijmNéoMNMHLNMQMJNNEMQN H in?» I muWIHlHHImmb ET NH 11%.? 1.: Iflfl .1 HH H Is 1 . 9722me QODOQ AmvH moHiA