A DESCRIPTIVE AND EVALUATIVE STUDY OF A SECONDARY SCHOOL DROPDUT PROGRAM Thesis for the Degree of Ph. D. MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY W. ROBERT DOCKING 1969 -—. Juu- ‘- THESIB LIT O \J-A v Y '1 "H All?“ 133111 2 UHlVC I 31 . c.) M's—u- ~< (i This is to certify that the W. .3 thesis entitled "O A DESCRIPTIVE AND EVALUATIVE STGDY OF A SECONDARY SCHOOL DROPOUT PROGRAM presented by W. Rdbért Docking has been accepted towards fulfillment of the requirements for Ph . D . degree in Education Q7 7];/ X/ /:(/4—/ // Major professor L/ Date July 30, 1969 0-169 A ; _._..__.._.——-—- av - SUNS' {RY INC ntNDERS 'bvisSIuJ RETURNING MATERIALS: Place in book drop to LJBRARJES remove this checkout from “ your record. FINES will be charged If book is returned after the date stamped below. W—- ;p ._ - ' A bk ‘ ‘3»! 5 l LEI] .'- o I“ {Ii ‘I-M" "‘ ‘ .4. Eva P 1' J I’ ABSTRACT A DESCRIPTIVE AND EVALUATIVE STUDY OF A SECONDARY SCHOOL DROPOUT PROGRAM By w. Robert Docking American high schools today lose between thirty and forty percent of their students as dropouts. These drOpouts generally find it difficult to find employment and to obtain a standard of living which will allow them to be happy, productive adults. Many billions of dollars have been spent in the last six years to decrease the dropout rate and to train dropouts with necessary skills. Most of the money spent and programs developed have had minimal success. The Pontiac Public Schools, faced with a large dropout problem, established the Individualized Instruc- tional Program (IIP). The program was designed to take dropouts off the streets and to help them attain a high school diploma. The IIP consists of A5 students who were drOpouts or potential dropouts. The program is staffed by three experienced teachers and a director-counselor. Curricu- lar offerings are based on a continuous progress, W. Robert Docking work—study, and core concept. Student—staff ratios are limited to 15-1, while the student—counselor ratio is 90-1. The original goals of the IIP were to (1) improve school attendance, (2) improve achievement, (3) increase achievement motivation, (A) improve citizenship behavior, and (5) reduce problems related to social, psychological and educational adjustment. This study was conducted to determine whether these goals and objectives were being reached. The study further describes the unique aspects of IIP and lists recommendations for improvement. The instruments used included the SBA Reading for Understanding (to measure reading improvement of the IIP students), the Michigan State M—Scales (to measure achieve- ment motivation improvement) and the Mooney Problem Check List (to measure improvement in social, psychological and educational adjustment). In addition, attendance patterns of the students were tabulated. The study further includes profiles of the staff, student body, and graduates. Questionnaires, which gathered data from parents, teachers in the Pontiac Public Schools, and student-staff perceptions of the IIP are also reported. The major findings of the study were: 1. IIP students attend school 7% more now than they did in their previous school. w. Robert Docking 2. Reading scores of IIP students increased almost one full year in one semester. 3. Perceived social, academic, and psychological problems of IIP students decreased after one year in the program. A. Student achievement motivation neither increased nor decreased after one year in IIP. 5. The IIP staff has a wide range of experiences in teaching prior to entering IIP. They express much satisfaction in teaching in the program. 6. The student body highly recommended IIP and feel it is an excellent program. 7. The graduates of IIP recommend the IIP very strongly. Over a third of them are presently en- rolled in college. 8. Parents of IIP students hold very positive atti- tudes toward the IIP. 9. The staffs at Central and Northern High Schools do not feel well informed about IIP and desire to learn more about the program. 10. The students and staff of IIP hold common per- ceptions on the unique characteristics of IIP. Recommendations were proposed, by the author, that could strengthen the IIP in the future. These included: 10. w. Robert Docking Establishing a study committee to evaluate the K-12 program in Pontiac to determine what can be done to decrease the high percentage of dropouts. Establishing a student-staff committee to develop priorities of needed equipment for the present IIP. Providing monies and personnel for consultant help to the IIP staff. Providing the IIP staff with time and tuition to attend a two week sensitivity training laboratory. Building lines of communication to other Pontiac schools to merchandize the IIP. Establishing a second IIP in the Northern half of the school district. Contacting service clubs for financial assistance. Organizing systematic testing programs for incom— ing IIP students. Limiting visitors to specific times. Providing inservice training and discussion time for the IIP staff. A DESCRIPTIVE AND EVALUATIVE STUDY OF A SECONDARY SCHOOL DROPOUT PROGRAM By W. Robert Docking A THESIS Submitted to Michigan State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Department of Administration and Higher Education 1969 c; é/M/é’ 3-/r}”170 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS First, I want to thank my wife Millie and our children Pam, Jeff and Tim for the support, understanding and acceptance they have given me while completing my degree. I will be indebted to the four of them for the rest of my life. I only wish every graduate student could have the love and empathy from their family that I have received during the completion of their degrees. Second, I would like to thank my committee. Dr. Blackman, Dr. Heald, Dr. Thornton and Dr. Suehr were tops. They form a great model for a doctoral committee in our college. In conclusion, I wish to thank Dick Ayling and Harry Pike for the assistance they gave me in the col- lection of the data and the reading of the manuscript. These two men will always be remembered as "special people" in the heart of this author. God Bless all of you. ii Chapter I. II. TABLE OF CONTENTS TIE PROBLEHVI O O O O O O O 0 Statement of the Problem . . Justification for the Study. General Description of the Introduction . . . . . Staff. . . . . . . . Physical Facility. . . Student Body . . . . . Instructional Program. Grading. . . . . . . . Graduation Requirements. Extra Curricular Activiti Rules Governing Behavior Admittance Procedures. Student-Teacher Ratio. Student-Counselor Ratio. School Climate . . . . Program Costs. . . . . Assumptions on Which Study Limitations of the Study . Summary. . . . . . . . . Historical Background. . Who Are The Dropouts?. . o O o o H O o a: U3 oomoooooooooooooofijoo m 0000......- Q. ooHoooooooQEOOooooof—I REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE . . . Why Do Students Leave School . . Model Characteristics of Early Identification . Success Experiences. . Work-Study Programs. Grade Competition. . . Self Concept . . . . . Teacher Preparation. . Accepting Teachers . . Class Size . . . . . Type of Curriculum . Guidance Services. . . Selected Action Programs Summary. . . . . . . . . iii Dropout O O O O O O 0 Programs. III. METHOD OF INVESTIGATION. . . . . . . . . . . . DB Attendance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . A3 Achievement. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . D3 Achievement Motivation . . . . . . . . . . uh Social, Academic, and Psychological Problems. . . . . . . . . . . . . Rank Order Questionnaire . Parent Questionnaire . . Teacher Questionnaires Student Questionnaires Graduate Questionnaire Structured Interview . p- \‘l Summary. . . . . . . . . . A8 IV. ANALYSIS OF DATA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . h9 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . D9 Attendance Patterns. . . . . . . . . . . . . N9 Reading Achievement. . . . . . . . . . . . 52 Social, Academic, and Psychological Problems . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5h Achievement Motivation . . . . . . . . . . . 56 Staff Characteristics. . . . . . . . . . . 59 Student Body Profile . . . . . . . . . . 61 Graduates. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 68 Parent Questionnaire . . . . . . . . . 72 Central and Northern's Staff Perceptions of IIP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 73 Student- Staff Rank Order Questionnaire . . . 77 Summary. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 80 V. SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS. . . . . . . . . . 83 Summary. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 83 Conclusions. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 88 Recommendations. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 89 Personal Note. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9h APPENDIX. C O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 96 BIBLIOGRAPHY. O O O O O O O O O O O O O I O O O O O O ILLS iv LIST OF TABLES Table Page 1. Attendance Comparison-Regular School vs. IIP. . 51 2. SRA Reading Test Scores of Twenty-four IIP Students. 0 O O O O O I O O O O I O O O O O c 53 3. Mooney Problem Checklist Scores of Nineteen IIP Students. 0 O O O O O O O I O O O O O O 0 SS . M-Scales of Twenty-three IIP Students . . . . . 58 . IIP Staff Characteristics . . . . . . . . . . . 60 h 5 6. Presently Enrolled IIP Student Profile. . . . . 62 7 IIP Graduate Characteristics. . . . . . . . . . 69 8. Mean Responses From Parent Questionnaires . . . 7h 9 . Pontiac Central and Northern's Staff Questionnaire of IIP. . . . . . . . . . . . . 75 IO. Student—Staff Rank Order Questionnaire. . . . . 79 LIST OF APPENDICES Suppliment A. Student Rank Order Questionnaire. B. Parent Questionnaire. . . . . . . C. Teacher Questionnaire . . . . . D. Teacher Questionnaire . . . . . . E. Student (In School) Questionnaire F. IIP Graduate Questionnaire. . . . G. Mooney Problem Check List . . . . H. The Michigan State M-Scales-Female. I. The Michigan State M-Scales-Male. J. SRA Reading For Understanding . . K. Graduates Attitudes About IIP . . vi Page 96 98 100 101 103 105 107 113 126 lhO 1A1 CHAPTER I THE PROBLEM Among the most serious problems facing American secondary education is that of providing programs mean- ingful enough to retain until graduation those students who are now leaving the educational system prior to com- mencement. That such students now exist in large numbers is evidenced by Rudman's estimate that, of the 26,000,000 people entering the job market between 1960 and 1970, some 9,800,000 will not have completed high school and will hence face serious unemployment problems for all of their working lives.1 The problem is compounded by changes in the job market itself: From 1957 to 1962 the public sector of the economy produced an average of 285,000 jobs per year, and the private sector produced 175,000 jobs per year. However, the labor force increased by 660,000 per year during the same period. This meant that there were 200,000 fewer additional jobs per year than new workers in the labor force. When the widening gap between available new jobs and new workers in the labor force is added to the trend toward more jobs requiring skilled lHerbert C. Rudman and Richard L. Featherstone, Urban Schooling. New York: Harcourt, Brace and World, TnCO’ Iqbao p. 28-290 workers, the need to retain students in schgols for longer periods of time becomes obvious. Michigan, in common with all states, is affected by the dropout problem. Between 35,000 and h0,000 stu- dents annually leave the state's schools prior to gradu- ation. In 1966-67, 35,739 students dropped out of school.3 This figure represents 6.7% of the total student popula- tion in grades 9—12 within the state. The Pontiac Public Schools, a large urban school district twenty miles to the north of Detroit, Michigan, ranked third highest in the state in total percentage of students who dropped out of school during this time period.u During 1966-67, Pontiac lost, as dropouts, some 836 students. Thus, 15.3% of the total student body were lost as dropouts, a percentage more than twice the state average. Pontiac's dropout percentage is also the highest in Oakland County. During the final semester of the 1967-68 school year, educators in the Pontiac schools decided to attempt a unique and direct attack on the district's dropout 21bid, p. 9. 3Public High School Dropouts in Michigan 1966-67. Research Monograph No. 7 Revised, Michigan Department of Education, June, 1968. p. 3. “Ibid, p. 15. 3 problem.5 The district purchased a large old house across from Pontiac Central High School, hired a special staff, and created a new environment and a new educational pro- gram for both its potential and its actual dropouts. Salsinger reports on the composition of the new program's first class: Richard Ayling, charged with selecting #5 stu- dents, started with letters to 225 recent dropouts. Twenty-two agreed to return. Another 16 were so poor academically, below a .5 grade average (E+), that they were obviously not going to graduate, and the ogher seven were discipline and behaviorial problems. Ayling became principal of the new school and director of the Special program. Pontiac had, obviously, only begun to reach a small percentage of its dropouts. Based upon the apparent success of the IIP, applications have now been made for six additional centers patterned after the initial model. If granted, the additional centers would allow the dis- trict to serve an additional 300 students per year. Because of Pontiac's size, age, and sociological and psychological characteristics, the area represents a not atypical urban area faced with the not atypical pro- blems. Indeed, apparent within the area are many of the burdens and challenges which have beset American cities 5Harry G. Salsinger, "Dropout Hi h Seems to Click." Michigan Educational Journal, A :5, (January 1, 1969). p.120 6Ibid, p. A3. h during the 1960's. A recent report by the Michigan Civil Rights Commission draws a bleak picture of Pontiac's situation: Pontiac is a city divided by racial and ethnic prejudices and fears. Negro and Spanish-American citizens are excluded from full participation in employment, housing, education and social services. They are often denied equal protection under the law and equal access to jobs in law enforcement agencies. The physical isolation which has resulted between white and non-white citizens has led to a communications gap of staggering proportions. Civil and governmental leaders show little concern for, or understanding of, minority-group problems. Negroes and Spanish-Americans grow more and more distrustful of a community they feel is trying to contain them. Pontiac is not alone among the nation's cities in facing a rapidly worsening problem, a problem which is reflected in its schools. The Kerner Report has pointed up the problem on the national level. Shaw writes that: The number one problem faced by urban teachers today is how to offer culturally deprived youth an education that meets his needs. In 1950, about one child out of ten attending public schools in the nation's fourteen largest cities was culturally disadvantaged. In 1960, the proportion had risen to one in three. Some authorities believe that by 1970 it may be one out of two. Tgese figures under- score the urgency of the problem. 7"Report and Recommendations from a Public Inquiry into the Status of Race Relations in the City of Pontiac, Michigan." State of Michigan Civil Rights Com- mission, June, 1968. p. 1. 8Frederick Shaw, "Educating Culturally Deprived Youth in Urban Centers", Phi Delta Kappan, Vol. XLV, No. 2, p. 91. In light of the nation's urban problems, and their impact on the more specific dropout problem, Pontiac's program becomes highly significant. If successful means of coping with the dropout problem are found here, than similar programs should have a good chance of success in other communities. Statement of the Problem During the past forty years, American educators have attempted, with ever increasing emphasis, to find or create programs that would make the high school experi- ence meaningful. The federal government alone has spent, during the past six years, millions of dollars on attempts to curb the growing dropout problem. Yet, in spite of the millions spent, close to h0% of America's youth today leave school before graduation. In contrast to this drive toward better school programs is the fact that h0% of all children in the United States fail to complete high school; they are dropouts. This is particularly alarming when one considers that in no other country is high school education so readily available and has so much emphasis been placed on high school graduation as a minimum educational goal...amp1e evidence has been compiled to show that students who drop out harm themselves both culturally and economically.9 Are there ways in which our schools can retain high school—aged youths while giving them the skills 9Solomon 0. Lichter, Elsie B. Rapien, Francis M. Seibert, and Morris A. Sklansky, The Drop-Outs. New York: The MacMillan Company, 1968. p. 2. necessary for an effective adulthood? That is the central question posed by this study. The answer is sought through examination of the dropout retention program currently in operation in the city of Pontiac, Michigan. Justification for the Study The objectives of the Pontiac IIP, as listed by the Pontiac Board of Education, have been to: 1. improve school attendance. 2. improve achievement. 3. increase achievement motivation. 4. improve citizenship behavior. 5. reduce problems related to social, psychologi- cal and educational adjustment.10 The one piece of research done to date on the pro- gram, research done by Dr. William Robertson, a psycholo- gist employed by the Pontiac district, indicates that the IIP has in fact been meeting its objectives.11 Pontiac, because of financial and personnel limi- tations, is not currently in a position to conduct further research on the program, in spite of the fact that staff at all levels of the district have indicated that such research is necessary and most desirable at this point—in time. loIndividualized Instruction Prggram, Activity 2 ESEA Experiments 1967-68. Pontiac Public Schools, June, 1968, p. 15. llIbid, p. 22. A number of questions thus remain unanswered. What, for example, are the factors within the program which need to be investigated and reported? What areis the relative impact of these factors upon the student body? What are the strengths and weaknesses of the program? Answers to these questions and others would help not only to modify and improve the Pontiac program, but will have implications for planned future programs within that district and in communities across the nation. General Description of the IIP Program Introduction The student who attempts to resume his education after having once dropped out of school often finds the same conditions awaiting him in school which prompted his original departure from academic life. Confronted by these forces a second time, many students drop from school once again, never to graduate. Pontiac's plan of attack has been to remove or to modify these forces, thus creating for the student a new educational environment. Within the Pontiac program, changes have been made in such aspects of educational life as student-teacher ratios, graduation requirements, the instructional program itself, the school climate, the system for grading and granting credits, rules govern- ing behavior, admittance procedures, and the counselor- student ratio. While other school districts have, within the scope of their regular programs, made changes in some of these items, few, if any, have made the sweeping changes reflected in the IIP. The current status of each of these items will be briefly described in the following pages. m The staff, funded under a Title 1 grant, consists of three teachers, a director, a secretary, and a custo- dian. All but one were chosen from applicants from within the system. The professional staff, described in detail in Chapter IV, numbers a combined total of some 61 years of secondary school teaching experience. One of the three teachers is responsible for lan- guage arts, one for math and science, and one for social studies. A core arrangement allows a broad, yet flexible, instructional base. The director, in addition to serving as a counselor, carries responsibility for administrating and evaluating the entire program. Physical Facility The IIP is housed in a 50-year-old colonial mansion in downtown Pontiac. The converted mansion is located on a site directly across from Pontiac Central High School. Three classrooms have been created in rooms that were once the mansion's dining, sitting, and living rooms. A converted sun porch houses the school materials center, while the kitchen, minus its sinks and appliances, serves as the director's office. The basement is used as a base for special pro- jects, housing a darkroom, an art area, and space for such activities as engine repair and rock cutting. The second floor contains space for teacher offices. Students sit at conventional school desks within rooms that are well-lighted, windowed, and carpeted. White walls contribute to an air of brightness to the home-like atmosphere Which the house retains. Student Body All of the forty-three students currently in the IIP once attended either Pontiac Central or Pontiac Northern High Schools. Twenty of the forty-three are boys, three of whom are married. Five of the twenty-three girls are wed. Nineteen of the students are black, twenty are white, and four are Spanish—American. Twenty-one of the students work, either full or part-time, and all are residents of Pontiac. The students are distributed throughout three grade levels: twenty-one are at the 12th grade level, nineteen are at the 11th, and three are at the 10th grade level. lO Instructional Program The school day is scheduled as follows: First Hour 9:00 - 10:35 Break 10:35 - 10:u5 Second Hour 10:u5 - 12:15 Lunch 12:15 - 1:15 Third Hour 1:15 - 2:00 Break 2:00 - 2:10 Fourth Hour 2:10 - 3:00 The curriculum rests on the concept of continuous progress, with students progressing through any given subject as fast as their motivation and achievement level will permit. Thus, two students working side-by-side in a math class may be doing 5th grade math and algebra, respectively. Because of the wide range of student capa— bilities, few formal texts are used. Most of the written material used is teacher-made, and tailored to the indi- vidual student. Courses desired by a student but not available within the IIP core may be taken at Pontiac Central. Two IIP students, having obtained permission from the Pontiac Central teacher involved, are currently taking such courses. Students may also, upon agreement with the IIP director, receive credit for outside employment. The amount of credit given is assigned on an individual basis, 11 and the IIP director maintains contact with the student's employer to check on progress in this area. Independent study courses are available in a variety of academic and non-academic areas. Many of these courses rest on programmed materials, with credit determined jointly by the student and teacher responsible for the project. Grading Grading, like the curriculum, is individualized. A unique feature of the grading system is the fact that no grades below "0" are given. If, on a given assign- ment, a student does not attain the "0" level, he or she is asked to redo the assignment. Evaluation rests on interpersonal discussion, with few negative marks or com— ments made on returned papers and examinations. However, students who attend classes at Pontiac Central are expected to conform to the grading norms of those classes. Graduation Requirements Students in the IIP have the same graduation requirements, with the exception of physical education, as do all students within the Pontiac district. Each student must complete 12 units of academic work, includ- ing 3 units in English, 1 in science, and 1 and 5 in social studies. Once these requirements are met by the IIP stu- dent, he or she may graduate with a regular diploma, 12 participating in all of the district's regular graduation exercises. Extra Curricular Activities The IIP, with the exception of normal field trips, a spring picnic, and a dance, sponsors few extra curricu- lar activities of its own. It students are, however, encouraged to join the clubs, organizations, and athletic [teams which are available to all Pontiac Central students. C’Rules GoverningfiBehavior By comparison, students in the IIP are governed by few rules. There are no rules covering dress, nor rules concerning haircuts. Afro hair styles are accept- able for both boys and girls, as are beards, mustaches, and goatees. Profanity is not encouraged, but acceptable as an honest mode of expression. Smoking is permitted in specified areas of the school, both before and after school and during breaks and lunch time. y/’ Attendance and tardiness rules are minimal. A student may miss three days of school per month without being required to offer either excuses or written explan- ation. After three absences per month have been exceeded by a given student, the problem becomes a topic of dis- cussion for’the IIP director and the student. Students move from class to class without school bells. Should a student habitually be late to class, 13 the problem is discussed with the director, in the manner of attendance problems. Suspension would be possible under IIP rules, but would come only as the result of a major infraction. Such an infraction, represented perhaps by a serious fight or by the striking of a teacher, has not occured, and no student has been suspended from the IIP for mis- behavior. Admittance Procedures When the IIP began, students were obtained from two sources. Letters were sent to students who had already left school inviting them to participate, while students still in school were screened on their potential as dropouts by a special committee. This committee, com- posed of the district director of pupil personnel ser- vices, a counselor, the district attendance officer, one of the two high school principals, and the IIP director, sought to select students who yet might be dissuaded from leaving school. Some changes have been made as the project has matured. The committee, having proven unwieldy, has been dissolved, and the IIP director now makes admittance decisions. Any student currently "on the street" may apply for admission to the program. In making his deci- sion, the director attempts to evaluate the strength of the potential student's desire to obtain a high school diploma. 1h A waiting list currently exists of potential stu- dents who desire admittance to the IIP but who cannot now be served because of a lack of facilities. Since the program is structured to operate with a maximum of forty- five students, vacancies must occur in the existing stu- dent body before new students are admitted. The program is closed to students who have dropped out of school at the midpoint of the Spring semester, even if vacancies should occur. Student-Teacher Ratio The total enrollment of the IIP, as noted above, is held rigidly at forty-five students. The student- teacher ratio, with three full time teachers, is thus 15-1. Student absences, employment, and independent study all tend to limit the number of students actually in any given classroom at any one time and tend to bring the "true" student-teacher ratio closer to 10-1 than to 15-1. Student-Counselor Ratio The director of the IIP has a background of train- ing in guidance and counseling, and devotes at least half of his day to these activities. By serving in this capa- city, in addition to his administrative duties, he provides the program with a maximum weighted student-counselor ratio of 90—1. 15 School Climate The climate of the school has been designed to be as positive, as accepting, and as warm as possible. Mini- mal rules, non-punitive grading policies, and an individu- alized curriculum all help contribute to this type of climate. The staff attempts to know each student as well as possible, to realistically diagnose learning styles, strengths, and weaknesses. Circular seating arrangements are used in classrooms, with teachers attempting to become more a part of the learning group and less figures of authority than is normal. A lack of attached blackboards and other educational appliances further contributes to an atmosphere that is more home-like than institutional. Although past achievement and behavior patterns are treated as a matter of record, they appear to be also regarded as past history by the IIP staff. Trust, while not blind, is clearly a part of the school climate. Students move freely about, leaving to go to the bath- room, a resource center, or an independent study project without hall passes or questions from their teachers. Program Costs Exact costs are available for IIP, funded under Title 1 of 1964's ESEA. For the 1968-69 school year, IIP was budgeted at $62,311.00, divided thusly: l6 133m Amount Director $lu,500 Staff $36,237 Secretary $ u,000 Blue Cross $ 1,080 Instructional Materials $ 500 Traveling and Meeting Allowance $ 200 Office Supplies $ 100 Equipment $ 275 Retirement and Social Security $ gzglg Total $62,31112 The average yearly cost for each student in the IIP is $1,38u.00. This compares with an average yearly cost for other Pontiac students of $7h0.30. One factor contributing heavily to the difference is the salary sche- dule for the IIP teachers, all of whom hold M.A. degrees and have achieved the maximum possible level on the Pontiac salary schedule. IIP teacher's salaries average $12,079, while the average for the entire district rests at $9,u66. Assumptions on which the Study is Based The study rests on a number of assumptions. Some are personal, stemming from the author's experience with little-motivated students. The remainder are founded on 12Dana P. Whitmer, The Book of the Budget 1968-69. School District of the City of Pontiac, October, I968, p. 17. 17 learning theory, on discussions with educators experienced in this field, and upon the histories of other successful programs for the high school dropout. These are the assumptions underlying the study: To retain students who have already dropped from school at least once, any new program must be both highly individualized and differentiated from previous programs in the students experience. A staff capable of creating a warm and accepting psychological climate is better able to motivate students to stay in school than a staff which is not. Both the size of a school and its student-teacher ratio must be small if students are to receive the help they need to stay in school. Students can function well and responsibly without a rigid rules structure. Such a structure, in fact, can in itself cause dropout problems. A teaching staff self-selected in nature will do a better teaching job with the dropout student than will a teacher forced to deal with the pro- blem as part of a hetrogeneous classroom situation. A low student-counselor ratio, and the resultant ease of access to the counselor will enable stu- dents to explore alternate solutions to their learning difficulties and personal problems. 10. 18 I'Grading policies which are punitive and based on competitive effort can cause serious difficulties for some students. For these students, grading policies which are both non-competitive and rein- forcing in their nature are more effective as achievement motivators. A separate physical facility, away from the aca- demic mainstream with its reminders of past failures, will enhance the chances for success of a program aimed at recapturing secondary school dropouts. A curriculum based on the concept of continuous progress, with students entering an area of study at their own readiness level, will be effective for a group of students with wide academic back- grounds and abilities. Students who finish the IIP will have better self- images than when they began the program. This self-image will, in fact, be grounded in reality, as their saleable skills will also increase. Limitations of the Study The study will examine only one dropout program: the IIP in Pontiac, Michigan. There may well be unrecognized local variables which will limit the degree of generalization possible to other groups of students in other geographical areas. l9 2. Some of the research tools used in the study are self-reporting instruments. With these instru- ments especially, the "Hawthorne Effect" may become a factor. The IIP, with its newness, its high visibility, and the esprit dg_gggp§_of its staff and students, may be highly prone to this effect. For this reason alone, replication of the study within the next twelve to twenty-four months would seem highly desirable. 3. Much of the philosophy governing the IIP's operation fits the author's preconceptions of a sound educational program. The fact that this personal bias does exist would further argue for replication, replication ideally by a researcher of differing orientation. Summary Ours is a society wracked by social conflict and haunted by the spectre of rising technological unemploy- ment. The dropout problem in large urban areas of our nation represents both a cause and a symptom of these larger problems. While the dropout problem has received growing attention in recent years, attention reflected in both increased research and enlarged funding, few conclusive answers have yet been found. One program which appears. 20 to show special promise is the Individualized Instruc— tional Program now underway in Pontiac, Michigan. Research done to date indicates that the Pontiac program has achieved a high degree of initial success in both induc- ing students to return to school and in assisting them to persist in obtaining their high school diploma. The study will examine the IIP in greater depth than has yet been done in an attempt to ascertain its strengths and weaknesses and to formulate recommendations for future expansions of the program, expansions now in the planning stage within the Pontiac system. CHAPTER II REVIEW OF RELATED RESEARCH Introduction The problem of retaining students in school, in common with most problems in education, is extremely complex. In an attempt to delineate the boundaries of the dropout problem, this review begins by examining the historical background involved, continues to an examin- ation of the students who prematurely leave the educa- tional system and a look at their reasons for leaving, and concludes by surveying those programs which have exhibited some success in working with the dropout and the potential dropout. Historical Background The future of any country which is dependent on the will and wisdom of its citizens is damaged, and irreparably damaged, whenever any of its citi- zens is not educated to the fullest extent of his capacity, from grade school through graduate school. Today an estimated four out of every ten students in the fifth grade will not even finish high school - and that is a waste we cannot afford. In addition, there is no reason why one million young Americans, out of school and out of work, should all remain unwanted and often untrained in our city stffiets when their energies can be put to good use. 13as quoted in NBA Newsletter, "Project School Dropouts." Washington, D.C.: 1:2, February, 1963. p. 2. 21 22 With this portion of his 1963 State of the Union message, President John F. Kennedy served notice of a growing national concern over the ability of the nation's education system to retain its clients. President Kennedy's remark was to precede the first major national allocation of resources to this critical area. In the years which followed 1963, the Kennedy and Johnson administrations allocated billions of dollars to public education, dollars funneled into a multitude of programs. These funds were triggered, in part at least, by the growing realization that the nation's urban pro- blems had reached the flash point. In this sense, the 1965 Elementary and Secondary Education Act was crisis legislation, much in the manner that the earlier 1957 National Defense Education Act, triggered by Sputnick, had been crisis legislation. This type of reaction was not atypical. Angus,lLL in looking at the dropout problem over the span of the last sixty years, notes: Three characteristics of the current literature on the dropout problem, the predominance of "crisis" rhetoric," fundamental disagreement among profes- sionals, and the existence of a broad consensus interpretation among laymen, suggest that there is an ideological component to be found in the various interpretations that have been offered. In the 1”David Lee Angus, "The Dropout Problem: An Inter- pretive HistoryJ'Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Ohio State University, 1965. Reported in Dissertation Abstracts XXLI, p. 6Hh5. 23 reform controversies of the early decades of the present century, differing conceptions of the drop- out problem were at issue. They were: 1. The federal government, with its "Back-To- School" drive of 1918, shifted the focus of atten- tion from the causes of school leaving to its con- sequences, pointing out the economic advantages that accrue to schooling. 2. During the twenties, educators were occupied with creating an educational system that was to be the handmaiden of the industrial system. 3. The manpower crisis of the war years caused a decrease in school enrollment and an increase in youth employment. A. In l9h5 a coalition of those favoring federal aid but opposing any program styled after the depression-inspired National Youth Administra- tion initiated the Life Adjustment Movement. 5. Reinforced by the launching of Sputnik in 1957, this school of criticism altered the course of educational development, focusing attention on the academically talented and the gifted and turning attention away from the dropout problem. The relaxing of Cold War tensions in the sixties again made the dropout problem the center of ideological controversy. Thus has the attention paid to the dropout problem shifted over the decades, sometimes rising in response to perceived crisis, sometimes falling in response to seemingly unrelated events. Who Are The Drgpouts? Prior to the early 1950's, dropouts were commonly characterized as a homogeneous group, a group characterized by the inability to cope with academic studies and proce- dures. Some still regard dropouts as a group plagued by reading difficulties, poor grades, and retarded progres- sion through the grade levels of our school systems, a group drawn from the bottom of the intelligence distribu- tion. Such a View is at least partially supported by 21: studies that have found limited intellectual capacity to be a definitive characteristic of dropouts. Studies by 16 Cook15 and Delaney provide excellent examples of this line of research. On the other hand, a differing conclusion may be drawn from studies conducted in the states of California and New York. These conclude that dropouts do not differ significantly in intelligence from those students who remain in school. One such study compared seventy-two continuation school students with seventy-two regular high school stu- dents in Stockton and Fresno, California. The two groups, matched on age, sex, grade, scholastic aptitude, and pater- nal occupations, showed no significant differences in IQ.17 Some question exists, however, as to the representitive quality of the regular student sample, since they were not chosen at random but were selected to match the con- tinuation school sample. 15Edward S. Cook, Jr., "How IQ Figures in the Drop- out Problem," School Executive. LXXIV, September, 195D. p. 56. 16John F. Delaney, "That Vacant High School Seat," American School Board Journal. CXXI, November, 1950. p. 22-23. 17William Evraiff, "How Different Are Our Drop- Outs?" Bulletin gfIthe National Association of Secondagy School Principals, XLI, February, 1957. p. 2I2-218. 25 McCreary and Kitch report a study conducted by 18 Sando in California's Contra Coasta County. Sando selected one hundred sophomore dropouts from eight high schools, matched them with one hundred sophomores who remained in school, and found no significant differences in the IQs of the two groups. Again in this study, match- ing was done on the basis of sex, socio-economic status, and high schools attended. A study in New York City conducted by the New York Board of Education found little difference in the IQs of graduates and dropouts.19 Further, all of the IQs in both groups fell within the normal distribution range. That dropouts are no less, or little less, intel- ligent than successful students appears to be borne out 20 21 by studies by Layton and the U.S. Department ofILabor. 18William H. McCreary and Donald E. Kitch, "Now Hear Youth," Bulletin of the California State Department of Education, XXII, October, 1953. p. 275Eh. 19Glenn L. Burgess, "Is I.Q. A Factor in School Dropouts?" New York State Department of Education, 1965, p. 111. 20Warren K. Layton, Special Services for the Drgpr out and the Potential Dropout. Publication No. h08, NationaIPChiId’Labor Committee, October, 1952. p. 70-75. 21U.S. Department of Labor, School and Early Employment Experience of Youth: A Rgport on Seven Com- munities, 1952-57. Bureau of—Labor Statistics, Bulletin No. 1277. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1960. p. 27. 26 Both indicate that half, and perhaps as many as three- fourths, of all dropouts, have the necessary mental capabilities to successfully complete high school. Why Do Students Leave School? The question remains, then, as to why students capable of completing high school choose not to do so. A number of studies in this area may be summarized by an examination of five of the most comprehensive, done over a twenty-year time span. These studies appear to indicate that three major variables are involved, and that the reasons given by students for leaving school cluster around one of these three. The major variables are student self-image, famfl§b1background, and the degree to which the student identifies with, and feels accepted by, the school. Johnson and Legg, in interviews with MAO drop— outs, found that students most often spoke of their dis- satisfaction with school, mentioning most often unhappiness with their courses, their teachers, the attitudes of their fellow students, discipline, and their own failures.22 In a study of early school leavers, Dillon noted that: 22Elizabeth S. Johnson and Caroline E. Legg, "Why Young People Leave School." National Association of Secondary School Principals, Washington D.C., 19h8. 27 In combining the three reasons that occured most frequently as primary reasons for leaving school, it was found that 62 per cent of youth said they left either because (1) they preferred work to school; (2) they needed money to buy clothes and help at home, 25 (3) they were not interested in school work. A more recent study by McCreary and Kitch con- centrated on the student's feelings toward the school: Rather than withdrawing from school, the drop- outs see themselves as having been rejected py. school. A sizeable number report they could not get along with their teachers and fellow students. Typical complaints are that they miss the teacher's encouragement and support, resent his classroom mannerisms, and doubt his ability to instruct. He is described as distant, pedantic, boring, unfair in meting out punishment and reward, and simply not "one of the boys."2 Schrieber lists nine reasons for prematurely leaving school. They include reading retardation, grade retention, subject failure, low intelligence, family attitudes, the organization and size of the school, low self-image, general dislike of school, and lack of inter- est in school.25 In an extensive study of Michigan school dropouts, the Michigan School Holding Power Committee found no fewer than twenty specific reasons for early departure from school: 23Harold J. Dillon, Early School Leavers, National Child Labor Committee, l9u9. p. 63-6h. 28W. H. McCreary and D. E. Kitch, Now Hear Youth. Sacramento: California State Department of Education, 1953. p- 39. 25Daniel Schrieber, "The School Dropout, Fugitive From Failure." NASSP Bulletin, h6:27h, May, 1962. p. h. 11.. 15. l6. 17. 18. 19. 20. 28 Consistent failure to achieve. Grade level placement two or more years below average for age. Irregular attendance and frequent tardiness. Active antagonism to teachers and principals. Marked disinterest in school, with feelings of "not belonging." Low scholastic aptitude. Low reading ability. Frequent changes in school. Non-acceptance of school staff. Non-acceptance of school mates. Friends either much younger or much older. Unhappy family situation. Marked differences from school mates, differences in size, interests, physique, social class, nationality, dress or personality development. Inability to match normal financial expenditures of classmates. Non-participation in extra-curricular activities. Inability to compete with brothers or sisters, or ashamed of them. Performance consistently below potential. Serious physical or emotional handicaps. Being a discipline 03825 Record of delinquency. Tannenbaum feels that another factor is involved in the dropout problem, a factor operating in addition to ‘the student's self-image, his family background, and his ”5 —--——-— n. I IF.“ ‘ ‘h" - “feelings towards school. That factor involves the value » ._ “Fm. ._.... of the high school diploma itself: High school completion is therefore becoming less and less a mark of achievement as more and more stu- dents are allowed to graduate each year. A kind of K\ Gresham's Law is beginning to operate, with easy-to- obtain diplomas driving down the cgedential value of 1. those that are more dearly earned. Instruction, 1960. p. 17. York: 26Publication #507, Michigan Department of Public 27Abraham J. Tannenbaum, Dropout or Diploma. New Teacher College Press, 1966. Preface. X’/' A. 29 Whatever motivates a student to leave school, education still must deal with the problem of either retaining or retrieving him in terms of concrete educa- tional programs. The following section deals with the operational characteristics of such programs. Model Characteristics of Dropout Programs Ten factors are found to be significant in the creation of successful programs for the high school drop- out. They include early identification, success experi- ences, work-study programs, non-competitive grading, self-concept, the preparation of teachers in special programs, the degree to which the teacher can accept the student, class size, the type of curriculum used, and the quality of the guidance services available. Early Identification The earlier that a potential dropout can be identi- fied, the greater is the chance of retaining him in school.28 Streem suggests that early identification can best be accomplished by looking for "danger signals" like poor attendance, poor achievement, grade retardation, 28Bruce R. Amble, "Dropouts." The Journal of Educational Research, 60:9, May-June, 1967. p. 322. 3O tardiness, and the acting-out of aggressive behaviors within the school setting.29 Success Experiences Success experiences must come early to the student in a productive dropout program. Both Besant3O and Doc- little,31 in surveying relatively successful dropout pro- grams, stress this point as a major factor in assisting the student to differentiate between the new program and the regular school program which he has rejected. Success, or the impression of success, may be imparted to the student by a stressing and reinforcement of any positive behavior on his part. Since the gratifi- cation needs of the dropout are liable to be short, rather than long, range, any goals set for him should be short range in nature.32 Teacher approval must be immediate and 29Bruce E. Streem, "An Attitude Survey of High School Dropouts by Means of the Semantic Differential Process," Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, University of Southern California, 1966. Reported in Dissertation Abstracts XXVII, l273-A. 30Lloyd Besant, "Lessons from the Rodman Experi- ence with Dropouts." N.E.A. Journal, 58:2, February, 1969- p. 52-5D. 31Lawrence W. Doolittle, "A Pupil Holding Power Study in Four Detroit High Schools," Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, University of Michi an, 196D. Reported in Dissertation Abstracts, XXIV, D398. 32Besant, Op. Cit., p. 56. 31 strongly positive, and a variety of opportunities for achieving small successes must exist.33 Work-Study Programs Work-Study programs, which enable a student to work at least part time while attending school, have been seen as a useful tool in retaining students in school pro- grams. In separate studies, Birkmaier,3u Kohler,35 and Handy36 have given strong endorsements to such programs, primarily on their strength in reducing the poverty level which often faces potential dropouts. The variety offered by work-study programs also seems to cut into the drudgery of a long school day, and the chance to learn while earn- ing can convince doubting students that there is a payoff in education. The authors cited above are convinced that work- study programs designed specifically for the dropout are necessary and valuable additions to the school curriculum. 33Ibid, p. 59. BuEmma Marie Birkmaier, "What's To Be Done With The Dropout When He Drops Back In?" North Central Asso- ciation Quarterly, 38:D, Spring, 196D. ‘p. 306-307. 35Mary C. Kohler, "The Dropout Problem," The Bulletin of the National Association of Secondarnychool Principals, Vol LI, December, 1967. p. 31-39. 36Henry Welsey Handy, "Evaluations of Curricular Offerings As Causative Factors For Students Dropping Out of High School Before Graduation," Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, University of Washington, 196D. Reported in Dissertation Abstracts XXIV, D396. 32 Such programs are, however, unfortunately usually designed for students with higher grade point averages than those carried by students who tend to fall into the dropout 37 catagory. Grade Competition The normal classroom is a competitive arena. According to Elam,38 Moore39 and MindelLLO the student who has a low interest in the academic aspect of school will tend early to withdraw from the competition and to cease doing the required work. As a result, their grades tend to drop lower and lower and they try to compete less and less. The authors noted above decry the competitive aspect of most grading systems and propose flexible grading sys- tems as a replacement. Under this type of system, the student does not compete with others. The competition, if any, is only with himself. A 37M. Stebbins, "Flint Offers the Potential Dropout a Personalized Curriculum," Clearing House, Vol. 38, December, 1963, p. 205-209. 38Stanley Elam, "Laying Out New Routes to Adult- hood," Phi Delta Kappan, XLV:2, November, 1963. p. 69. 39J. W. Moore, "Reducing the Dropout Rate," Rpport On The Holding Power Project. Albany: New York State Education Department, Bureau of Guidance, 1963. p. 9. quathilde Toby Mindel, "A Study of In-School Learning Experiences as Contributing Factors in School Dropouts," Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Wayne State gniversity, 196D. Reported in Dissertation Abstracts, XXV, O25. 33 All three authors feel that the poorer student will increase in motivation when he is not forced to com- pete with students whom he sees as brighter, more moti- vated, or both. Self Concept Successful dropout programs have stressed the need for improving the self concept of the dropout report Davis,ul Kaplanl‘l’2 and Warner.”3 While all human beings need approval and a feeling of their own worth, such needs are especially strong in students who feel themselves unworthy of praise, warmth, or concern from their teachers.uu "The basic need for these students is the feeling that instructors in the program think that they are worthy individuals and really care about them.")'LS When, for the individual student, this need is not satisfied, gratification is sought elsewhere and more NlDonald A. Davis, "An Experimental Study of Potential Dropouts," Personnel and Guidance Journal, XL:9, May, 1962. p. 799. uzBernard A. Kaplan, "Educating The Culturally Disadvantaged." Phi Delta Kpppan, XLV:2, November, 1963. p- 7&- "30. R. Warner, "The Scholastic Ability of School Dropouts." Selected Reports and Statistics of School Drppr outs." U.S. Office ofFEducation, 196D. pI‘DZ. ”NR. D. Strom, "Realistic Curriculum for the Pro- spective Dropout," Clearing House, October 196D, p. 101-106. uslbid, 'p. 107. 3h and more time is spent away from school. When the school begins to focus on the acceptance needs of the student, he responds by feeling wanted and by spending time in the school settingJ+6 Teacher Preparation McGeochu7 and Newberry"L8 note that most teachers enter the profession from middle class homes or are persons who have strong middle class aspirations. They tend to be academically orientated, people who have enjoyed their own school experiences. Consequently, they need assis- tance in dealing with the dropout and with the potential dropout. Most teacher education programs do not provide this type of assistance. Special inservice training, special institutes, and further graduate study has seemed to help teachers who work with poorly motivated students.”9 The most effective training seems to be the actual experience of teaching in a dropout program. Here, the teacher's ideas, uélbid, p. 108. N7Dorothy McGeoch, Harry Passow, and Vernon Hau- brick, Programs for the Disadvantaged. Washington, D.C.: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development, March, 1966. p. 12. "BDavid N. Newberry, "An Evaluation of a Dropout Prevention Project in Hazel Park, Michigan," Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Wayne State University, 1967. Reported in Dissertation Abstracts, XXVII, 2035-A. ugCarl Laisson, "Feast Attracts Job Hungry Stu- dents," NEA Journal, December, 1966. p. 20-22. 3S concepts, and attitudes can be tested against the reality of the dropout's world.SO Accepting Teachers 53 Robbins,51 Kirby52 and Newberry all found one of the most important factors which contributed to the Success of the programs they studied to be the degree to which students felt accepted by their teachers. Where this acceptance factor was high, all three authors noted that teaching staffs tended to work harder than they had in regular programs, and seemed to be more willing to give individual help to students. Teachers felt more gratifi- cation in teaching and, although they worked hard, showed more expressed satisfaction from working with dropouts than they had in working with regular students. Class Size The class size ideal for maximum learning has been a subject of debate in education for decades. While the debate itself continues to the present, most special EOIbid, p. 2D. SlArnold H. Robbins, "Factors Which Influenced Potential Dropouts in High School to Stay in School," Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, University of Connecti- cut, 1966. Reported in Dissertation Abstracts XXVII, ll39-A - llDO-A. 52Carson 0. Kirby, "An Experimental Study of an Organized Program of Teacher's and Counselor's Friendly Interest in Potential Dropouts," Unpublished Doctoral Dis- sertation, University of Colorado, 1966. Reported in Dis- sertation Abstracts, XXVII, l2D8-A - 12D9-A. S3Newberry, Op. Cit. p. 2035. 36 education classes are typically small in size, usually containing no more than fifteen students.5h These classes, some researchers feel, should serve as the model for programs created for the dropout. Kerner,SS Newberry,56 and Schwebel57 all feel that small classes are necessary if the dropout is to receive the individual attention he requires. This factor appears especially important in light of the fact that many drop- outs have reading difficulties.58 A low student-teacher ratio, all three researchers feel, will enhance the chancesof a dropout programs achieving all of its stated objectives. Type of Curriculum Since dropouts enter special programs from a wide background in terms of age and ability, the usual SNStrom, Op. Cit., p. 10D. SS"Educational Implications of the Kerner Report on Civil Disorders." NEA Journal, 57:6, September, 1968. p- 3h-37. 56Newberry, Op. Cit., p. 2035. 57Melton Schwebel, "Learning and the Socially Deprived." Personnel and Guidance Journal, XLII:7, March, 19650 p. 656. 58Harry H. Scales, "Another Look at the Dropout Problem," The Journal of Educational Research, Vol. 62, December 8, April, 1969, p. 339. 37 curricular structure normal in school programs seems inappropriate for use in dropout programs.59 60 and Handy61 both found a "continuous Brunfield progress" type of curriculum to be effective in dropout programs. This form of curriculum, sequential in nature, allows a student to enter a program at his or her level of ability in each subject area. Once the entering level is determined, the student can progress through the balance of the subject matter at his own rate. He is thus freed from a learning pace set either by his teacher or by his classmates, and from the competitive pressure that such paces can generate. Guidance services Studies by Dillon,62 Wolfbein,63 and Youngéu reveal that easy access to counseling services is a factor in Sglbid, p. 3D1. 60Stanley H. Brunfield, "An Approach to the Student Withdrawal Through the Use of the Structured Open-Ended Questionaire and the Focused Depth Interview," Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, University of Southern Mississippi, 1967. Reported in Dissertation Abstracts, XXVII, lO30-B. 61Handy, Op. Cit., p. 11D. 62Dillon, Op. Cit., p. 71. 63Seymour L. Wolfbein, "The Transition from School to Work: A Study of the School Leaver." American Person- nel and Guidance Association, Washington, D.C., 1959, p. 66‘67 o 6hJoe M. Young, "Can Counseling Reduce Dropouts?" Clearing House, September, 1955, p. D7. 38 dropout programs given high priority by students and teachers alike. Young found that dropouts, with their multitude of problems, can be helped by a low student- counselor ratio in the following ways: 1. Individual students can be helped with specific problems, both personal and academic. 2. When counseling is readily available, the per- centage of students planning training beyond the high school level increases. 3. A greater percentage of the student body makes plans for their vocational future. D. The dropout rate decreases. 5. There is an improvement in the school's rela- tionship with parents and with the community. 6. ghe students have fuller knowledge on whicgsto ase educational and vocat1onal dec131ons. Selected Action Programs A wide variety of approaches to the dropout pro- blem exists regionally across the nation. Several of these approaches are surveyed below. In Detroit, Mfichigan, the Detroit Council for Youth Service, in cooperation with several public and private agencies, has conducted a job upgrading program since 19D9. Designed to aid unemployed, out-of-school youth who are referred to the program by social agencies, schools, or individuals, the program attracts primarily 651bid, p. 55-56. 39 youths in the 16 to 17 year old age range who have dropped from the ninth and tenth grades of school. Lasting at least forty weeks, the program consists of both counseling and specific job training. Partici- pants met in a group for three hours each morning for dis- cussion of behavior and personal problems, job-hunting procedures and proper work habits. Typewriters and other office machines are available for practice in clerical skills, and field trips are taken to employment and social agencies. Each participant is given tests in reading, aptitude, and intelligence, and special assistance in reading is available. Regular high school courses are open to the program's participants. During the year reported, D1 per cent of the pro- gram's participants were placed in jobs, 26 per cent left the program, and D per cent returned to school on.a full- time basis. Twenty-nine percent were still in the upgrad— ing process.66 In Wisconsin, a state law requires all Milwaukee youth who have dropped out of school before their eight- eenth birthday, and who are not married, to attend school at least one day a week if they are employed or to attend school full time if they are not employed. 663. N. Horton, "The Job Upgrading Program." The American Child, SLIII, March, 1961. p. 29-31. D0 In the part-time program, testing, training, counseling, placement, and follow-up services are avail- able. In the full-time program, job skills and good work habits are taught. A placement service helps in finding employment and those who are placed in jobs are followed up once every six months for at least a year. Fourteen full-time counselors are available to both groups, and both programs teach youths some skills, show them how to assess their abilities, and help them to become steady workers.67 A Roanoke, Virginia, program requires each school to periodically send a list of its dropouts to the director of the city's adult education program. The director then sends each dropout a letter asking that the dropout come in for a conference with the director. When the dropout appears he is given aptitude and interest tests and encouraged to continue in school, either in day or evening classes. Should the dropout insist on seeking a job, he is referred to the state employment service.68 Potential dropouts in Lincoln, Nebraska, are assigned a special counselor who instructs them in 67After Teen- -Agers Quit School. Washington, D. 0.: ‘United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Stand- ards, Bulletin No. 150,1965, p. 50- 57. 68Ibid., p. D7-D8. D1 cleanliness, the filling out of job applications, and other skills necessary for securing a job. If the youth is employed, periodic checks on their job progress are 69 made. Summary The dropout or potential dropout is not neces- sarily unintelligent. It is likely, however, that he is a person affected by problems with his self-concept, his family, or his relationship with school. He may also be affected by a general decrease in the importance assigned the high school diploma by our society. Programs to reclaim the dropout need, if they are to be successful, to pay close attention to early identi- fication, success experiences, work-study programs, the reduction of competition for grades, student self-concept, teacher preparation, teacher acceptance, class size, curriculum, and counselor-student ratios. A check on programs across the nation reveals a stress on job skill training and a heavy emphasis upon counseling for job preparation. 69Anita Vogel, "How to Check Drop-outs," School Management, V, November, 1961, p. 7D-8D. CHAPTER III METHOD OF INVESTIGATION The following instruments and procedures were used in examining and evaluating the Pontiac Individualized Instructional Program: 1. The attendance patterns, reading achievement, achievement motivation, and social, academic, and psychological problems of the student body were measured over a period of time. Changes in these areas will be reported. Questionnaires were used to sample the attitudes and opinions held toward the program by four of the groups affected by it. Included were the student body (see Appendix E), the program's instructional staff (see Appendix C), the parents of the program's student body (see Appendix B), and the staff of the district's two high schools (see Appendix D). A number of factors which differentiate the Indi- vidualized Instructional Program from Pontiac's regular school program have been isolated. These factors (see Appendix A) were rank-ordered by 1.2 A3 students within the program in an attempt to determine their relative importance to both groups. D. Structured group interviews were conducted with the student body. These interviews attempted to uncover data and feelings toward the program not covered by the instruments listed above. 5. Contact was made with 15 of the program's gradu- ates to date. A questionnaire was used (see Appendix F) to determine their characteristics and feelings about the program from the vantage point of a graduate. Attendance Attendance records for the first semester of the current school year were tabulated for 37 student's in the IIP. These tabulations will be compared with the student's attendance pattern during his last semester in Pontiac's regular school programs. Increases or decreases in frequency of attendance will be noted. Achievement Achievement was measured in the area of reading skills, an area, as indicated earlier, often particularly trO‘ublesome to the dropout. The SRA Reading For Under- -§E§E§11pg_instrument, administered at the start and at the firlish of the Fall semester of the current academic year, DD was the principle measuring instrument. Administered to twenty-four students, the instruments pre and post test- ing scores will be examined to determine the degree of improvement, if any, recorded by each student. The central question to be examined here is: have the IIP students improved significantly in reading, as measured by the SRA Reading For Understanding, during the first half of the current academic year? Achievement Motivation Twenty-three students, slightly over one-half of the total IIP student body, were given the Michigan State M-Scale in September of 1968 and were examined again shortly before the close of the academic year. The M-Scale provides measurements in four areas: . Need for academic achievement . Academic self-concept Occupational aspirations #7 x» n) +4 . Academic personality factors Results from the M-Scale testing will be examined to determine changes, if any, in their total achievement motivation scores. Social, Academic, and Psychological ProbIems The Mooney Problem Check List was used to deter- mine the social, academic, and psychological problems affecting members of the IIP student body. Nineteen LLB students, selected at random, were administered the Mooney Problem Check List at the beginning and at the end of the current academic year. Data from the eleven subsections of the Mooney will be tabulated from both testings for the number of problems reported. Increases or decreases, if any, or changes in the perceived problems of the nineteen students will be reported. Rank Order Questionnaire The Rank Order Questionnaire is an author-made instrument, developed by listing those aspects in which the IIP differs significantly from the two regular Pontiac high schools. The factors chosen for the questionnaire were those reflected by the IIP student body in a series of structured interviews held in January of 1969. In these interviews, students were asked to list all of the factors they saw as different in the IIP from the school they last attended. Each student and teacher in the program was admin- istered the questionnaire and asked to rank order the items listed in order of importance to them. Composite rankings for both groups will be compiled and the two com- posite rankings compared. Data from the compared rankings will be used to determine which aspects of the program are deemed of relative importance by both staff and students. D6 Parent Questionnaire The questionnaire for parents was developed to gather data concerning their perceptions of their child's academic and social progress since joining the IIP, plus their feelings about IIP in general. The questionnaire consists of a number of statements in these areas accom- panied by a scale containing factor values ranging from l-STRONGLY DISAGREE to 5-STRONGLY AGREE. Composite aver- ages for each item on the questionnaire will be compiled and analysis done to determine patterns in parental thinking about the IIP. The questionnaire was administered by mail to each IIP parent, with each questionnaire accompanied by the researcher's name and address, phone number, and a return envelope. Personal follow-up was done where neces- sary to insure as large a response as possible. Teacher Questionnaires Two teacher questionnaires were administered. The first was given those teachers actually working within the IIP program, and is designed to determine their back- grounds and their opinions concerning the strengths and weaknesses of the program in which they work. The second teacher questionnaire was administered to the teaching staffs of Pontiac Northern and Pontiac Central High Schools. Administered to 110 staff members at general staff meetings in May, 1969, this questionnaire LI? was designed to determine the amount of information about, and the sttitudes towards, the IIP held by those teachers who will be recommending students for the program. Student Questionnaire This questionnaire was designed to determine the personal backgrounds of students in the IIP program. It will be used to generate a composite picture of the IIP student body in terms of their family background, their current situation in the home, and their feelings about school itself. Graduate Questionnaire The graduate questionnaire also attempts to deter- mine the background of students, students in this case who have already completed the IIP. In addition, it seeks information on the graduate's life to date, including data on employment, further education, and family life, plus their evaluation of the strengths and weaknesses of IIP. Structured Interview Group interviews were held with the student body near the close of the current school year. Meeting in groups of eight to ten, students were asked what changes, if any, they would make in the program should they be given that responsibility. A composite of the suggestions was compiled at the close of the interviews and used, along with the data D8 gathered by the means listed above, to formulate recom- mendations concerning the future course of the program. This information will be included in Chapter V. Summary The students, graduates, and staff of the IIP were examined by means of a variety of instruments to determine both their backgrounds and their feelings towards the program. The impact of the program upon students was measured by means of the SRA Reading For Understanding, the Michigan State M-Scale, and the Mooney Problem Check List, as well as through a follow-up on students who have completed the program. Groups outside the program, parents,and teachers in other schools, were examined to determine the depth of their knowledge about, and their feelings towards the IIP. From the above information and a structured inter— view with IIP students, a series of recommendations will be formulated concerning the future course of the IIP. CHAPTER IV ANALYSIS OF DATA Introduction This chapter deals with data concerning the In- dividualized Instructional Program (IIP). It includes information of attendance, reading achievement, social, academic and psychological characteristics, and achieve- ment motivation patterns of the present IIP students. It further includes profiles of the staff, student body, and graduates. Questionnaires which gathered data from parents, teachers in the Pontiac Public Schools, and student-staff perceptions of the IIP are also reported. Attendance Patterns Attendance patterns of the IIP students were examined. This was done by tabulating the student's percentage of absences in the last semester of attendance at Central or Northern High Schools. Then, a similar tabulation was compiled for the same students attendance during the Fall semester of 1968, while these students were in the IIP. 49 50 Seven of the forty—four students were not in— cluded in this analysis. This was because of incomplete attendance records in the last school they attended, or because they had to attend the IIP only one day per week for assignments and/or evaluation. Table 1 summarizes the 37 students pre-IIP and post-IIP attendance. The average absence rate at Central or Northern, in the students last full semester, was 19%. After one full semester in IIP these same students were absent 12% of the time, for a net decrease in absences of 7%. Of the 37 students whose attendance was tabulated, 26 had decreased their daily absenteeism while in IIP. Eight students had gone up in their absence rate in IIP while three remained exactly the same in both programs. It should be noted that students who are now ab- sent more in IIP than they were previously is minimal. The attendance policy of IIP allows all the stu- dents to be absent a maximum of three days a month with no questions asked nor excuses needed. The attendance policy is not as lenient at either of the other two high schools. Nineteen of the students held outside jobs while attending IIP with their work hours ranging from twenty to fifty hours per week. In addition, eight students are married and twelve have children at home who must be cared 51 Table l.--Attendance comparison-—regular school versus IIP. N=37. Percentage Percentage Percentage Percentage of Semester of Semester of Semester of Semester Student Absence in Absence in Student Absence in Absence in Number Reg. School IIP School Number Reg. School IIP School l .29 .22 23 .21 .0“ 2 .21 .23 2M .26 .00 A .09 .OA 25 .12 .ll 5 .12 .ll 26 .03 .03 6 .12 .21 27 .30 .24 7 .35 .23 28 .13 .0“ 8 .22 .40 29 .38 .01 9 .34 .ll 30 .10 .01 10 .13 .22 31 .24 .14 ll .26 .26 33 .08 .05 12 .28 .22 34 .24 .07 13 .22 .20 35 .ll .02 14 .16 .08 36 .ON .ll 16 .Ol .00 38 217 .17 17 .25 .12 40 .13 .06 18 .45 .03 “1 .21 .2“ 21 .ll .16 “2 .19 .29 22 .05 .03 N3 .07 .04 NH .23 .07 Pre IIP Post IIP Average Absence All Students .19 .12 37 IIP students had an IIP absenteeism rate of 12%, after main- taining a 19% absentee rate in their earlier schools. This is a net decrease of 7%. 0“. 52 for. This places an additional attendance burden on many of the IIP students. There has been a positive shift in attendance rates for the students enrolled in IIP. The 7% increase in daily attendance is a measurable improvement. Readinngchievement As was noted earlier, one of the problems common to drOpouts is in being below grade level in reading achievement. The 2“ students tested on the SRA Reading For Understanding Inventory in the Fall of 1968 were no exception. In 17 of the 2A subjects tested (nearly 71%), the students were reading below grade level. When they were tested again in January, 1969, 17 students had in- creased their reading grade level while six decreased and one remained constant (Table 2). On a one tailed t test of significance, the change in the total test scores from 9.45 to 10.39 grade level was significant at the .05 level. When the subjects tested were questioned about their general interest in reading, 80% stated that they read more in the IIP than they did in the previous school they attended. Given as reasons for this increase were: (1) more assistance in learning to read from their English teacher, and (2) a more interesting selection of paperback books in the IIP library. 53 Table 2.--SRA Reading Test scores of twenty-four IIP students. Grade Placement Grade Placement Student Number Pre Test-Sept. 68 Post Test—Jan. 69 l 8.5 9.0 2 9.3 9.0 4 10.7 10.9 5 8.5 9.6 6 8.8 11.0 7 8.5 12.8 8 12.8 11.3 9 8.5 13.6 12 14.0 14.0 13 8.3 11.6 21 8.8 11.6 25 8.3 9.3 26 7.8 9.3 27 13.1 11.3 29 9.6 8.1 30 13.6 12.8 31 6.0 8.3 33 7.0 9.3 34 10.4 11.0 35 8.8 9.0 37 9.6 10.4 41 9.3 9.3 43 6.0 6.0 44 10.7 11.3 Average Grade Placement of 24 IIP Students Tested 9.45 10.39 The average grade placement for the 24 students tested went from 9.45 on the pmetest to a grade equivalent of 10.39 on the post test. The change of .84 years was significant on a one tailed t-test at the .05 level. 54 The English teacher the students made reference to is skilled in the teaching of reading and has a high interest in helping the students improve their reading skills. The English teacher stated that he is confident that the students are indeed reading more. He lists as major reasons: (1) the interest level of the paperback books is more in tune with the interests of the student body, and (2) the individualized approach that is taken to reading instruction is more helpful to each student. While many of the students tested continue to read below grade level, the gap is closing. In a four and one-half month period the gap has decreased, on the average, by eleven months. Social, Academic and Psychological Problems To determine the concerns and/or fears that the students in the IIP were experiencing, the Mooney Prob- lem Check List (High School) was administered. Pre-testing was administered in the Fall with the post-testing done in May of the current school year. The results are tabulated in Table 3. In eleven subsections of the Mooney, the students, after nearly one full year in the IIP, decreased their concerns in nine areas. Only in Health and Physical De- ve10pment was there an increased concern. 55 .Aowcmzo ocv :onaHom ocm mamaoz one Amm.+v pooEQoao>oo Hmofimmnm one spamom pdooxo mspoocoo oommonaxo mo popes: hams» CH oommooooo .owmoo>m one :o.mpcoo:pm mHH on» pmfiq xoono annosm mocooz on» no woman Ham CH mm.eH :w.:e ma.am nooonosm ma HH< an ooxooco manooom mo hooesz owmno>< Hopoe mo.m| m~.m 35.: monsoooonm moanoooe ocm ESHSOHsmso mm.m| ma.m mo.m Hmcofipmosom one Hocofimeo>lom3psm one n:.m| 00.0 ~:.m goo: Hoonom op pcoEpmSwoo o Hm.w Hm.» cofiwaaom oom mango: um.ml :m.m Hm.m mafiemm one oEom pm.HI mm.: mm.m owofipAMZIxomlqacmpssoo as. I mo.m mm.m mQOHpmHom HmOHononommmIHocomoom oa.ml mm.m mo.w mcofipmaom Hmoawoaocozmmtamfioom oo.HI mm.: mm.m mOHpH>Hpo< coapmonoom ono Hmfioom mo. I m:.m oo.m pcoESOHQEm .mcofipfiocoo wcfi>fiq1moocmch mm. + mo.» w:.m psoEQQHo>oo Hmofimmcm osm spamom omcmco mood .mmz wood ..uaom cooocoo mo mop< mo poz zooooz mo mQOHpoomosm noooesom an oesooeo manoomm mo sooesz owwoo>< .mHuz .moma .aozummmH .LOQEOQQomIImpcooSDm mHH Coooocfic no moooom pmfiaxoono anoo m Nocozll.m canoe I LU .. I. .N& 56 The highest positive changes clustered around five sub-sections. These included Adjustment to School Work (-3.47 problems checked), The Future (-2.85), Home and Family (—2.37), Social and Psychological Relations (-2.10), and Curriculum and Teaching Procedures (-2.02). Less dramatic changes were found in Courtship— Sex and Marriage (-l.27), Social and Recreational Activi- ties (-1.00), and Personal and Psychological Relations (-.74). Finances and Living Conditions (-.05) was the lowest positive area of change. Overall, there has been a decrease in the areas of eXpressed problems by the 19 IIP subjects tested dur- ing the course of almost one full year in the IIP. This decrease amounted to 16.32 fewer problems checked in the spring than were checked in the Fall of the same school year. Perhaps the increase in the number of problems checked in the area of Health and Physical Development is actually a good sign. The students appear to be be- coming more concerned about health habits, bad teeth, etc. Achievement Motivation The purpose of administering the M-Scales was to .measure the degree to which the students in the IIP changed their achievement motivation after nine months or more in the program. (I? c'f '71 57 The scales were administered early in September, 1968 and again in late May, 1969 to 23 randomly selected students of the program. One tailed t-tests were done on the four subsections of the test and on the total scores of all the 23 students. Not only did these students, on the average, not improve significantly on any subsection, but in 10 of the 23 cases they decreased slightly in their total score (see Table 4). The change in the scores, positive or negative, were not significant. Therefore, as measured by the M- Scales, the 23 students tested were no different in May than they were in the Fall in terms of achievement moti- vation, even though 13 went up slightly and 10 went down. Several factors may bear on this evidence, which appears to conflict with other data gathered from the program: 1. Students seem to be less academically motivated in the warm spring than they are when they first return to school in the Fall. 2. The IIP stresses personal growth and human inter- action more than it does academic achievement. Therefore, there is less stress in the day to day program on academic achievement per se. 3. With less competition for grades, perhaps the students are less able to be motivated along achievement lines. » 1.. A. /L »I;.. AI: 01.. 31v .(4 {4.4 .4 4 r- ..a. A14 A4\d . .I. .J\.. .11.. x . JI. «I 58 Table 4.--M-Scales scores of twenty-three IIP students. Pre Test Post Test Student Raw Score Raw Score Increased Decreased Number Sept., 1968 May, 1969 Motivation Motivation 1 81 88 / 2 93 101 / 3 54 48 / 4 114 94 / 8 96 103 / 13 110 103 / 16 88 65 / 21 87 93 / 22 107 76 / 26 86 93 / 27 101 99 / 29 65 7O / 30 124 120 / 31 65 55 / 32 73 57 / 33 89 39 / 35 65 79 / 36 64 78 / 37 64 72 / 38 77 89 / 4O 44 45 / 41 86 95 / 44 109 110 / Total 13 10 t-test of significance in motivation. .96. There was no significant change 0f the 23 students tested on the M-Scales, 13 increased their motivation and 10 decreased. and post testing was not significant on a one tailed t—test at the .05 level. However, the changes on the pre 59 Staff Characteristics Three of the four staff members listed in Table 5 have taught in the IIP since it began. One, a woman, has taught in the IIP since March, 1969. She was the fifth woman teacher in the program. The previous four lasted from three days to one full semester. All four asked to leave because of expressed dissatisfaction with teaching the kinds of students who were enrolled in the IIP. The age range of the teachers is from 31 to 49 years. While one has taught for 22 years, all of the staff has taught at least 11 years. Their total teaching eXperience collectively numbers 61 years, an average of more than 15 years per teacher. Each teacher's training background varies to some degree. At one time or another they have collectively taught most of the subject areas found in most high schools. All of the staff members eXpressed a high degree of satisfaction at teaching in the IIP. None wished to return to a regular high school teaching assignment next semester. They agreed that teaching in the IIP was more strenuous, demanded more creativity on their part, but was much more rewarding. While all four desire to return to IIP next Fall, they agreed that some improvements were needed in terms .DJ: . udmufl «.4 p . Q0539 J .12.. LL14: RSS1 ,. .llue... U“: «4%.? 60 noaomcsoo noaomcooo mow Isopoopfim moaoSum Hmaoom mocoofizo o oocoaom .cOo aeonaaonoucooz mow benefiomlnpmz .om .mznmnmnopmfim oocofiom o mOHoSDm Hmfioom soaomcsoolcmdawcm .mow uo< ph .3 as new 2 a omoHHoo some: omoaaoo unmade ooaoomz xom ponoooe condomso Opmsomnw mumsomnwaoocb .mow Isoocb .moaumfihopomhmco whopm mHHII.m canoe 61 furniture, hardware and software, and auxiliary help from community agencies. These improvements will be dealt with more completely in Chapter V. Student Body Profile Several of the characteristics of the present IIP student body were discussed in Chapter I. This section will go into more depth about the characteristics of the present pupils (Table 6). Only five of the twenty-three girls are married. Six others are pregnant and five additional students have had children out of wedlock. Principals and counselors have been seen by the students as being the individuals most helpful in inter— esting them in entering IIP. However, in eight cases, friends have been the major motivators. In other words, friends have been as significant as counselors or prin- cipals in interesting dropouts in the program. The student's parents have had a wide range of formal education. Fifty-eight percent of their mothers drOpped out of school, while 39% completed high school. One mother received her B.A. degree. Seventy-five per- cent of the fathers failed to complete high school. Seven, or 17% of the fathers,completed high school and three received a college degree. In fact, one father has his Ph.D. in physics and teaches in a university. 62 Table 6.--Presently enrolled IIP student profiles. o (l) H ,0 (DC: E >0 : oom 0H 2 W m. £:oe4 A4» 60 0:: 39H (U 4—3 'U C: CD (D (00 c o o as. so): +>5 o o H A Q)U o 9.4 :13 'C "U $4 DH (1) UJQ) (DI-fl :3 x o m o 3 Ewd c) o+>5 a p a) m a o o 5.: m 0 CC) $94 co co < o z: m 2c: an m+4>a 0.0 Mo Fa. 1 M l8 12 No — — Negro Friend 8 7 2 F 18 12 No - - White Counselor 8 10 3 F l8 12 No - — Span. Counselor l2 9 Amer. 4 M 18 11 No — — Negro Principal 11 12 5 F 18 12 No — - Negro Other 6 7 6 F 21 12 No - — Negro Counselor 10 3 7 M 18 11 No - — White Principal B.A. B.A. 8 M 19 12 Yes 1 1 White Other 12 12 Yr. 9 M l7 12 NO - - Negro Principal 7 6 10 M 16 10 No — — White Principal 10 6 11 M 18 11 Yes 1/2 1 White Counselor 10 6 Yr. 12 M 17 12 No — — White Probation 9 7 Officer 13 F 18 12 NO - l Negro Other 9 8 14 F 17 11 No - - Negro Principal 10 12 15 F 17 12 Yes 2 - White Friend 12 12 63 cofipmzomno soooa ocean .dHH oz one; opera on Hooeom as on so» ease; waoonom mo poo oOQQOLQ mwcfia loam ago: see anaoonam ocm moonpopm mo sonesz meHcomm saxooz ewcaxeoz toe paeoau o>Hooom now on xooz pom .msm exaoz sow on No Work 3 4 Yes $ 45.00 30 Yes College Yes 40.00 25 No 49 Yes Don't Know No 1 No 50.00 Yes College No 27 No 38.00 2 Yes Terminal No No Program Yes No Work, Don't Know No 20 Yes 35.00 1 Yes Don't Know No Yes 130.00 2 50 Yes College Yes No Work No Yes 50.00 2 32 Yes Work and School No Yes 135.00 0 50 Yes Work No No College Yes Yes 50.00 1 40 Yes Work Yes No Stay Home Yes No Table 6.-—Continued. $4 (I) H p m c E :> O 3 0. 013m m.4 z m .CQJH gnu w ox: 34Je4 m 4—3 'U C (D U) U) 0 c m 0 ps4 :02: p 3 (I) 0) fl r—J (1) 'U 0 $4 H C: 'U U 'o h era m 03m mifl :5 >4 (1) cu $4 3 E H 0 £4 4: :5 S-. p a) w L m o :5: m mczo mad m m < cs 2 :2 20 m me mo Mo. Fa. l6 17 10 NO - Negro Principal 9 7 17 19 11 No - White Principal 9 2 18 17 12 No - White Principal 7 l2 19 17 12 Yes 6 White Friend 12 12 Mo. 20 18 12 Yes 5 White Principal 12 - Mo. 21 16 11 Yes 1-1/2 Negro Friend 5 6 Yrs. 22 17 11 No - Negro Other 8 10 23 18 12 No — Negro Friend 8 8 24 16 11 No - Negro Principal 11 9 25 l9 12 No - Span. Counselor 10 3 Amer. ‘26 18 12 No - Span. - 12 3 Amer. 27 l8 12 NO — White Principal 12 8 28 18 12 No — Negro Principal 12 12 29 17 11 NO - White Principal 12 8 65 soapmsewpu mem< mcwam meH oz mhmz mamas Mfi Hooaom CH on sow paso3 waoonom mo pso commonm mmcHH upfim sew: 30m wmhmumfim pew mpmnuonm mo monssz mMCHCpmm saxmwz amcfixpoz pom pfiomso o>Hooom now on xmmz mom .mhm 1.. 0303 so» on Work No No College No No Terminal No No Program Terminal Program Yes No College No No Stay Home No Yes $ 50.00 3 40 Yes College No 2 “0.00 38 Yes Yes Terminal Program Yes No 65.00 3 40 Yes Terminal Program Yes No College No 150.00 40 Yes Yes Don't Know No No Terminal Program No No College Yes 60.00 1 30 Yes Yes Work No No Table 6.--Continued g o H ,0 (DC! E >0 3 015m owa z o. (H 50H b—j-‘J W" 0;: 343k4 m p U c . m m m o c m o Lxl CG)C p 5 o m H q Q)U cap-H C'U U 'U h Qra m we; mid 3 x m m h 3 Evi o n+3: m p a) m h m o 3;: m a): o maq m m < (5 z s: 20 m me mo Mo. Fa. 30 M 17 ll NO - - White Parent 8 Ph.D. 31 F 17 12 No - 1 Negro Principal 12 11 32 NO DATA 33 M 17 11 No - - White Principal 12 B.A. 34 M 16 11 No — - White Counselor 12 9 35 F 16 11 NO - — White Principal 12 6 36 F 16 11 NO — l Negro Friend 12 9 37 M 19 12 No - - White Counselor 12 8 38 M 18 12 Yes 9 1 White Brother or 10 10 Mo Sister 39 M 19 11 No - - Span. Counselor 8 - Amer. 40 F 17 11 NO - - Negro Friend 12 8 41 F 17 11 No - 1 Negro Friend 8 3 42 M 16 ll NO - — Negro Other l2 12 43 F 16 10 No - - Negro Principal 11 - 44 F l7 12 Yes 2 1 White Principal 8 10 Yrs. 67 soapmscmmw hmpm¢ dea& meH oz mhmz mamas «A Hoonom CH on now padoz waoozom no p30 pmaaomm mwcaa Imam ham: zom wmnmpmfim cum mpmnpopm no 960832 mwQHCme saxmmz wmcaxpoz mom pfipmmo m>amoom so» on xooz pom .mpm expo; sow on College No No Work and School No No Don't Know No 20 Yes $ 40.00 1 Yes Work No No No Terminal 1 20.00 No 20 Yes Program College Yes 12.00 2 Yes Yes Work and School No Yes 160.00 1 40 Yes College No Yes 135.00 5 50 Yes College No Yes 77.00 5 50 Yes Work Yes No Don't Know No l 50.00 40 Yes Yes Don't Know Yes No Work Yes No Work and School No No 68 Sixteen of the twenty-one students who work full or part-time while attending IIP receive high school cred- it. This credit varies depending on the nature of the Job and the number of hours worked per week. The students range in earnings from a low of $12.00 to a high of $160.00 per week. Their average take home salary is close to $70.00 per week. Most of the students come from large families. The average size of their family units is 6.7. In seven- teen, or 39% of the homes, there was at least one older brother or sister who had drOpped out of school. Sixty-seven percent of the IIP students felt that they would have remained permanent dropouts if the IIP school had not been established for them to attend. This is almost 7 out of every 10 students. Plans after graduation are not final for all of the students. However, 55% feel they will continue their education in some formal way after receiving their diplo- ma. Of these, 63% expect to enter a regular college pro- gram and earn a Bachelors Degree. Graduates To date, there have been nineteen graduates of the IIP. Questionnaires were mailed to all nineteen. Fifteen returned them. Two students could not be found and two students were sent three separate copies and re- turned none (Table 7). Table 7.--IIP Graduate Characteristics. N=15. o, .p 013a. m : £u3 x cs4 o o th mcL CGJC 21c :3 mm -H A we F1 OHH ma \\ "(3.0 (1) $4 Dr! 0H U10) (Dug ' 23E (D K 0 L4 3 SHE $443.75 (US-4 U) .pzs no o m m <3 5.: m c m c<3 L.o L m2: 4—3 >30.) O H (Du-l 0 cm W m 5 pump”: up ccu :«s m¢4bo m ¥>O £1 :6 ocux. o 3 A thing to be honest. This individual has chosen number "2" for the statement "I feel it is always a good thing to be honest." This means he feels that this state- ment sometimes describes him. It is best to mark your first impression, try not to change your answer. If you change an answer, erase completely your first choice. Remember to angwer the statements as they apply to you! 12A -12. Ratiggs: I; Never 2; Sometimes 3. Usually J» Always N S U A 112. Many times I become so excited I find it hard to go to sleep 1 2 3 A 113. I day dream.frequently l 2 3 A llA. I work things out for myself rather than have a friend show me how 1 2 3 A 115. It is difficult for me to keep interested in most of my school subjects 1 2 3 A 116. I flirt l 2 3 A 117. Most of my school subjects are useful 1 2 3 A ll8. I like just about everything about school 1 2 3 A 119. I have a hard time concentrating on the subject during class periods 1 2 3 A 120. Even when I do sit down to study, I find that my mind tends to wander l 2 3 A 121. I like to make the best grades possible 1 2 3 A l22. I like to study 1 2 3 A 123. I like to plan very carefully what courses I will take in school 1 2 3 A 12A. I am said to be quick tempered l 2 3 A 125. I learn slowly I 2 3 A 126. It would be worthwhile to belong to several clubs or lodges l 2 3 A 127. I plan my activities in advance 1 2 3 A 128. I think I would like the work of a teacher 1 2 3 A 129.' I want very much to be a success l 2 3 A 130. I would be uneasy if some of my family were in trouble with the police 1 2 3 A 131. I get disgusted with myself if I don't do as well as I should 1 2 3 A 125 -13.. Rating: 1. Never 2. Sometimes Usu 132. 133 . 13A . 135. 136. I like to plan my activities in advance I like being with people in social gatherings Sane subjects are so unpleasant to me that I can't talk about them I like to be consistent in the things I do I would like to belong to a motorcycle club Alw 126 AIGUENDIXIII. Name THE MICHIGAN STATE H~SCALES (Form C — Male) I. THE GENERALIZED SITUATIONAL CHOICE INVENTORY This is a survey of_your choices. There are no right or wrong answers. The results will in no way affect your grades in school. The inventory is made up of pairs of statements. Read each pair carefully. Circle the number of the one you would most prefer or like to do. Answer all questions as honestly and frankly as you can. Only in this way will the results be meaningful. Remember this inventory is about ' ygu and y9u_alone. .Ihis is not_a surygy of what you can do, but of what ypu would like to do. EXAMPLE: Which would you prefer to do? 1. (:3) Go to a party, or '2) Read a book This person circled the number "1" which means that he would prefer to go to a party to reading a book. If you have adv/7.9u9.5.i.1293a.~..raisanrsuahcrdo If not. turn to the next page and answer all the questions. 29 Not kip Any_gu§§tigg§! WOrk as rapidly as you can and do not spend too much time on any one item. This is not a survey of what you can do but of what you would prefer to do. 127 I would prefer to: 1. 2. 3. 9. 10. I would 11. 13. l) 2) 1) Avoid failing in school, or Do well in school Receive a grade on the basis of how well I did on the teacher's test, or , Get a grade on the basis of how hard I tried Have the best teachers in the state in my school, or Have a large recreation center in my school Buy a car, or Continue my education Be well prepared for a job after graduation from high school, or Be well prepared to continue learning Have the teacher give everyone the same grade at the beginning of the term and know I had passed, or Take chances on getting a higher or lower grade at the end of the course DevelOp a new product which may or may not be good, or Make a product as good as the best one available Receive money for my good grades, or Be allowed to take any course I wanted because of good grades Be successful in finishing a job, or Finish a job Get excellent grades because I have a great deal of ability, or Get average grades because I have average ability prefer to: l) 2) 1) Be graded at the end of a course with the possibility of making an "A", or Get a "C" at the beginning of a course along with everyone else Make quick decisions and sometimes be right and sometimes be wrong, or Deliberate over decisions and usually be right Be allowed to take extra courses before or after school, or Just take courses offered during the school day 128 I would prefer to: 1A4 1) Complete ' a jo ob which I recognize as difficult, or 2) Complete a jO Ob which other's recognize as difficult 115. 1) Do as well as most of ry class ates, or 2) Do bit ter the n most of my classmates 2L6. 1) Be considered as being strong but not ve cry smart, or 2) Be considered as being weak but smart 317. I) Be known as a p-erson with much ability, or 2) Be known as a pa rson with ad£:quaee abi li ity 118. 1) work at mgr) 1€fi§ inner ant joos which I know I could finish, or 2) Work at gne_ vqgji ginort nt job which may never be entirely finished inI my life— time 119. 1) Be paid for how well I did a job, or 2) Be paid the same amount no matter how I did the job 20. 1) Work rapidly just "skimming" along, or 2) Work slowly with great thoroughness I would prefer to: 21. I) Have a bet_ter job than my father has, or 2) Have a job like my father has 22. I) Have a great deal of money, or 2) Be an CXpert in my favorite school subject 23. 1) Have average ability and be liked by many people, or 2) Have superior ability but not be liked by as many people 2h. 1) Have everybody in the class get a "C" at the beginning of the course, or 2) Be graded at the end of the cou‘se with the possibility of getting a higher or lower malk 25. 1) Receive a giade on the basis of how much my tezcher thin1:s I have learned, or 2) Take a course from an instructor who gives"C”'s 26. 1) Be paid for the 329232 of work I did, or 2) Be paid by the hour 27. .1) Study my assig -nents during study hall, or 2) hait to study until the mood strikes me 28. 1) Think of an idea that nobody he s eve r thought of, or 2) Set a world's speed record I would 29. 300 I would 31. 32. 33. 31.. 35. 36. 37. 38. 39. 1.0. Ivmmm Al. 129 prefer to: Do what I think is right, or Do what others think is right 1) Work ove: ti:; o to make more men e3, or 2) Get more se“eoling to make no1e money prefer to: 1 al of money, or Inherit a grea‘ do Earn a g1e ea '1 of money Wait Get job ri~ht af tcr high Plan my life in advance, or Live my life from day to day “tudy to go to college, or Study to gate out influence Have a grea of of: m‘oition tdea l Hsve a g1ea t dea 1 Carry out the plans of others, Create some‘1ing of my own until I had finisled college ard make a better sale a1y, school and make a good salary 01“ of ligh school over people, or 01" 1 Be known as being a "good guy" or a "good gal", or 2 Be known as person who "does things well” 1 Be very happy, or 2 Have lots of money 1 Be known as person who knows his own mind, or 2 Be known as aperso.*1 who gets help in mazing decisions I Do so1c1n1n like CV€1yON3 else or 2 Do something outstaad1ng prefer to: 1) Put tog air a new object, or 2) DevelopCi new ide"e do good wo:k, or YW ‘r..\r- ,1}, _\ _ _’ '1 fl 1) he c1.e.11«:1;1111;; oz; 111,171.11 to 3 L 1‘. -°. ,. BIL), «Lnr-JLEEXK 2) Be demanding on s so th51t they will do good work 1) he so etiing thfit I have ione eforC, or 2) Do something that I peter h<1e done before 130 J I would prefer to: LA. 1) Discover a gold mine, or 2) Discoxcr a new medicine AS. 1) {eve one of Hy children win a beauty contest, or 2) H8VC one of my chilcren win a college scholarship 131 II. ‘1'\V>w"‘\v V\IV\v .- Vy I “.5 r.-"“ C‘{Iv-‘ ’1’ IVIT. P1111I'rzi'uw.) JV? C11-L."1.Cl:17‘.7.111 ltd SCAM, u... .--.._..-, —..' -—... .2 .- , 1-——~‘.., .11 --._. --.--.. DlrLCL‘O”C' dtht kind of a job do you prefer? In the following items you will- fin two job 01111c11:1.tics paired. From each pair choose the Qne chaI-d1.stic you value host for your future job, after your education. rac eiistio "l”, circle that nunber. If a l you prefer "2”, circle i, ,CDC you p1e1 01;; t. fe sure to nzrk onl;r one choice for ea ich pair. Do not exit any items. In soie cases, it will be hard to mal: a choice be t.een the items :ecause you nby want to choose both items l - - J» or neither. But renenzer, you must In I:e a choice. By"? *1] I11. . O I ---'--~‘—.- I prefer: l. (:3) A job 1h'c h is e: Heiti 2) A job wlm“e theze 8.10 no lay-'Offs C: \ led the nunbcr ”l" which means that he prefers that 1' This is a sur"cy to find out your job preferences. 23339 are no ric}1t 22.!f9é3 ?“9‘ T3- .—-._— H—n __. - If you have a y questions, raise your hand 6nd as {the examiner. If there are no ques 1io21s, turn the page and begin! .1. W - 4‘. ‘_‘ I prefer ['76. A7. A8. 1490 50. 51. 52. 53. 51+. 55. 56. 57. 580 59. 60. I prefer. 61. :23> >:mx A 3>II> 3>3> A A in- ID U job job iob U job l‘i'h i C h which where which where where where {hi 0 h where where :hich where 132 I solve problems no one else can permits me to take days off when I want does not require a college education I could decide how the work is to be done I solve problems no one else can does not require a college education my Opinion is valued I could not be fired does not tie me down absorbs my interests I could be known for outstanding accomplishments does not require a college education I could decide how the work is to be done I make few if any decisions does not tie me down I could continue to learn the rest of my life I could not be fired ' absorbs my interests I make few if any decisions I solve problems no one else can I could become known for outstanding accomplishments requires little thinking has high work standards I make few if any decisions with short working hours who re which where where whe re where where I solve probl ms no one else can requires little thinking my Opinion is valued I make few if any decisions I could become known for outstanding accomplishments I could not be fired I could decide how the work is to be done I prefer: 62. 63. 61.. 65. :Db 39> >- >> job job 3' oh 3 Ob job iOb U job job 133 which does not require a college edu ation where I could continue to learn the rest Of my life where my Opinion is valued where I make few if any decisions not require a college education which does I could express my ideas, talents, and skills where which requires little thinking where I solve problems no one else can 13h III. LJOI‘I) “prim-T IFL (I ITr --_.._o Following is a list of wOio s teas e1s ray use to do: cri oe students. You are to rate youis H] on each wOIi as you think your 1239;133" v you° (JI‘ Be sure" to mdescribefiycurself as y_orr ‘e'clors ”oulc not as you would 7!“ d'“ "OLI?:v;l;:. -“Y~-~ -4- ~1‘_ Read each word carefull‘r then d6 cide which of the follo ing ratin J, t)8 would be chosen by your teachers tO describe you. isiirs_39;bgr hasrinsisiiiuibsr I This word would no yer describe me. 2 This word EEIEEiESE describes me. 3 This word ugyglly describes me. A This word all“ descri es me. After you decide how your teacher might rate you, circle the correct number. EXAMPLE: N s U A 1. Happy 1 2} 3 A This individual has circled the rating number "2" for the word "happy." ThlS means that he fcelsthat his teachers think that the word "happy" asusiinga -escribss him. If MVOU hef: ;;fl;O”CELVOW11 raise your_ hand. If not, turn to the next page“ and be gin rating, all Of the woxds. Dc; lot 91” p A133 T1111‘s., Work as Tapldly as you can and do not spend too nuch tine on any one word. Teacher 66. 67. 68. 69. 70. (V 0 Teachers 71. 72. Teachers 76. 77. 78. 79. 80. Teacher feel that I am: patient talented intfficient practical confident feel that I am: logical smart successful careful thorough feel that I am: orderigr purposeful uninterested studious different feel responsible original consistent intelligent irr¥Lhe-Jenorr 4 1 . 4, L1!l('~b I £1.71}: <'\) {\J M U) M (\D M U) cwmwww cwwwww cwmmww wmmwm 1+ 1; 1; 1; 1+ I; 1; A A 1+ 1+ A 135 Teachers 86. Teacher C’) 9l. 92. 93. lOl. 102. 103. lfiflt. 105. 71," I f 0 feel that I an: rebellious IlCl‘VOUS reckless dependable feel that I an: a person who postpones exacting lazy stubborn f‘ ,. C ELI‘OI I‘ C feel that I am: intellectual alert above “verase O productive a thirdxu‘ feel that I am ambitious contented an achiever a planner competent ‘ “1‘.7f1‘fc‘ 4.- 3.;3 v»’ _«‘_‘V —-——.‘- N M N U) N N cwwwww cwmwwm cmwmww wwwww >> :— 3- :~ z~ r~ z> t~ t— :~ :~ c~ r~ 1,‘ ° RatIUSS! J. flower 2. - .. -_..-—-“._.~—. _.__-—......—..-_- Teachers feel that I am: lOé. 107. 108. 112. 113. ‘ ‘ i .' J . J lllCOIleJfi LU}; u teachabla efficient feel that I am: easily dis~ tracted H M l 2 3 b.) wwwm 136 1+ L‘L‘L‘ 1; __Z Aitnexyc ,.u.£,'v A) 137 IV. T7 '5'. li“. “‘"V'M‘Tr' \‘fir IIU”;:'L'I ji r ,.T:i . 13“.“ ‘. J‘s’iul ~o—h- - -_ ‘-» - -7 '77 EYLi.I DIR CIIQIS: PLEASE READ C3;7lt‘I\ Followin" is a lie t o- stateutnts about ‘1'“Uc Iiea d each stateront calefully! Tlnzi decioc whetima'idlzi_s stair (nit is how you.§fllgjgs feel usually feel, EE gt: pg feel or Lgijr feelo '9 ”Ln affh :~ .~ -... 7..-..- 1 This stath ;nt w.oul d njycr les.ribe the M193 I fecl 2 This statement QLKEEIKCQ describes the way I feel a This statement usually describes the way I feel p A This statement flnrig describes the way I feel Answer eachs ateuent~wDo not leaxe any blank. There are no right or wron g anew." ' e The way you ensue these stetemcncs . g1 in any way. Circle the numne:r that best desc rs apply only to you. feet your school marks bes how you feel ‘9 a) 3“ P H) O EXM-JLE: N S U A l. I feel it is always a good I. 69 3 A thing to be honest This individual has circled nu her ”2” for the Sb