WI; ”a: 1: '11.}“ " 1:111o.n;" ' ' :1: ‘ 51-?H'W’w 0;. I .311... ' '11:.""‘1':u3”1."’1' 13?? ’ W" ‘19: 7'. w. 1 ~l' ' l""l. ,1 ”W41 ‘3.” {‘3 n ‘1‘?” 1‘ 1'23. " I "f? ' in“: . {L ["',5:1:I{K\th\4n(‘ (I‘M; 13$ I,‘ Vfl? _' ’I I EH“ “'? III ‘II‘ ‘1... -' u "I‘l" I" “31‘ ‘ 1 . A . W". AIL/t “I I_ 9.”; . ,5. u. l. , k . I.‘ (II .Ihy.<}I.'...:w‘- , r?4° '1’ ' “1 _"v | ‘13. hit-‘3 ‘Wlllli-llffl ‘~' $ ' $1", " U: '1‘ h;I.rr| “it .f;{lj - ”I J ‘. I11“: i"I "i'ffl 31‘“... ' '&$',I‘f:sh I." waér.5.1.3.356 3.1!) 13"‘1’1 .' I.I . : '1‘.1l:"'§11' 1‘. . 1I VJ I. '9’."1II.I’ ' 0‘ I: J .I‘I'"dIJ‘ 1': if ‘g- :31 Ilg.,'I1-.I’..IIII§§:;2:“If. g .51.... -' 'gl' 1.1M" ' "Wits-1:9 ”will 5"?" ”I. 1"!" J' I I, I'M". $"1""" 31:31.}: I": II. . . . ’ . >-. .:":"I .- 1' 1 ‘ . . I I 9 I '3 I _ L‘ 1‘ ‘3' (1 Jail“; .' .' I.I .' |9\;S;;:'.‘ 1.3..." . .‘1 h“; ‘. .: «v ‘ ‘. u- 1‘ A. :I I ... $1471: “1 .3150. ‘11:. 5‘ ., ‘I; \‘r ' uf“ ...: :1 '.;‘-.l.‘:".‘f")~‘§(‘ '. E::- J‘rfbj m1' o In 1 I v, _ , ‘ ,. ‘2 SAI, ’\ :0- . ~jcf; :3;- tail“ "”3 1:1: r- II}! ‘I. ’ 1’" ‘ ‘y‘n ”5.11.3.1 Wks l Ida .2: 1"‘3‘A7‘ .I‘. .'1 1. WM 1'97 1.111 ‘ '1'm2I ff, z.- 3&1 d3.” ' V“ I I.I- -IMI‘ y“ .1! 5m— 1'611 ‘1'. (\‘t{’(\' I'] “u‘ V' - 1’55“}? v “I a“? I' ”I'd-3’s. LI 1 1" c_\ .- (1‘31...) 11 1; ‘r ' IL." L. .. qu'.‘!L'I h 351$”. “‘4'". $15} :1 ‘y ‘ J .‘I .I .' , I ‘bnrcnhh‘ , I‘I'I I ,' if“. :ggxgh .’ II Th1 R::-‘~1‘lh_::::.é: ' 11M 11.1w I... . Ia I. WI \ I'- in“ 3‘11 "‘6 1’1““ 1’."-I 15",» IL I I. .fk‘nT. ‘ “"‘I‘i’I‘II‘I’M,’ .L; . - I .15.»: I . it? ("fin-i .II),:I :1i::| :1: 1’ 2N1II.I.A‘. .(I‘ov :11 l‘ .1?‘ {:3 “Ck": l - _4‘ ¢ ‘3“ , - 1 . ' I ‘3',“ .. ‘ :‘IOD‘SI .‘QI IIN 11:” :3: ‘ " "’- zes ._. I 'I'i}! 1|.‘jw’é‘jrvau‘? IL \\'I_q I, . I . I . 3.1.. ’1- .I, It"! ’WI' '-".~ A.” In ‘S'UI ‘1$“!H‘:4>." F f 4 '3'é Y: "3.1"“: ._,1HI.. "1"” "’1' . g. . ‘1‘1"1‘“‘?’““I'.” $.15... 1" Inn“ 9.1;. may: '1'}: 1:12'1 " E a :1me I :3: ’c Ikt’fflp \‘LIA¥&}L ; )‘hf. 4’ "Mi. ’,2". flif‘t a I. IIII 1"}.1‘I'CV‘11I'Ififgifi1 5””!th #1))? 2'9, F ‘1 2" :I. D‘slbl’ A'.- v. ‘ rTI ‘ ~ . IT“. LI“ ' ;’ II'~'II”~I.1 1‘ “I“: {"5“ “£113 ‘ "'i.I.I‘ .1 I' ”1": I’ “I: -‘ m 2H 33.- .II .131 .‘II ‘.II‘\ 5 affilw‘g, _’ 1.15" ‘- @5‘2‘33‘4; ”j: IQW . “1’9; 1:. _ «5‘: 3;" 4.1,1 1‘! 2‘: C 1:.étc,‘ Ion-1' ‘.' ~I‘!‘ 1,111.21, tun." 51:; ‘5‘," 1‘": "I. filth“. I'. fi.l‘h'::.fi- 7 "‘. . I 1.“ I’5‘ Quay 1‘16. J‘I‘Ifz’ *fifW-w‘ 1 I: II WM. .-: I‘a‘. we... (11.1 10.3 "‘fl""' {IX} 1;" -N"' .1 Q?“ {I (“12.11" I Hf. ”1.1.10 nI‘nuk} .. .gIZII. 1' 5.9%.”... ”(£111. ”(513' . Y "H. '35“. \I QIII. ‘1”. ”x.- '1 1': .c. I K1111)“. "fglllifin‘s .(l, fig? I . ._'.‘: Il‘ “I II, ‘J ‘\ I ' "I.‘I"VI|:"" "unlit“ . q). .I) .I1 1‘ | '1 1 IT": ’l‘iil'bl'" I” 1“: Hz‘:}'>¥’ if ‘ ‘I " ' " ‘I . .r 1“\ ‘ “2.3:. .‘ 1' .I'I. v.1. ’M’ ""1111” I 2) "‘1': l “1.1. "1'. ’H""‘.. 1‘I":(','.I 1“,." 1+6}: . . . III:;:’1II .t'inlf'.l';’.:f::‘.“ 11°.\‘)I’;‘-:III:IH” " '!' . ‘ .‘ "a: «If 3"." .1 III1.'.~I‘ .. I ' 5...") 1 .. 'lv lb" : . ' . .' “ ‘ ‘ I II'; 5"", _f‘ II ”“13. ’-:..: 1 I4, Em . ..'|| .1. I" ‘ tlli‘..1:hiz;.;| Ii .' - _ I l W’ "w. 7"; ‘ ' I' ’ I‘. '1'” 'l' 1’” 1.111 "1 ‘ '~.. 551' ""- . ‘I' I". III. 7'1" w E ‘. I“I I.l 1‘. tl"‘;' :El‘..?l 1.51!” I II ".I II ‘ I, f" _ $II‘JS'L11': .‘ I:?r '.\|K1'A"’ll ' VIII "I . '3 H’- ‘ 1.113" 723"“ '1‘“ ’IV’” 1‘11 “.1." "‘.-IT'~'.;.g:Igg;-;. I 8.14 fifit. ' “ 1 I I It“ _ _'.. L. .I .III, {_ .‘I . . 1'... In. IJQ I" «J 1' I ‘41" I I "H'W‘. II' '.'.'. I I ' . ’1 ‘ r. L I "’W’J” ”M" " ‘. . ' :-~'-..‘. ‘.-1 \I " ‘ .‘..".. ' {141‘ 'IlI'fi‘lib ;’ )n1l‘11.‘X2'--.‘Lilll”" a. .1.“ AA"! . - ‘ ' . . . "' Lt: ‘ u, . I. A llllllllll ll\llllllfllllWlllfll LIBRARY 312931 . MfichiganSmtc a Uaévm'my This is to certify that the thesis entitled TIE USE OF TRITIUM FOR CONFIRMING AREAS OF GROUNDWATER RECHARGE, MERIDIAN TOWNSHIP, MICHIGAN presented by Michael H. Ritter has been accepted towards fulfillment of the requirements for Master's degreein Geology Mfimr «an Date Jar 10; ”50 0-7 639 _OlERDUE FINES: 25¢ per day per item RETURNING LIE. WRY MlTrDTQ‘R: a.»— Place in book return to rt”: Charge from Circulaii n ,_ ~w THE USE OF TRITIUM FOR CONFIRMING AREAS OF GROUNDWATER RECHARGE, MERIDIAN TOWNSHIP, MICHIGAN by Michael H. Ritter A THESIS Submitted to Michigan State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE Department of Geology 1980 ABSTRACT The sandstones of the Saginaw formation form the major aquifer for the mid-Michigan area. Since the early 1940's the withdrawal of water from the aquifer has exceeded the rate of recharge and lowered the piezometric surface. A possible solution to this problem may be artificial recharge into the Saginaw aquifer. This would require the identification of areas where geologic conditions favor high rates of recharge into the Saginaw aquifer. This would require the identification of areas where geologic conditions favor high rates of recharge into the aquifer. Such an area exists in Meridian township where a partially mined out esker overlies the Saginaw formation. This study uses environmental tritium to confirm the presence of high rates of recharge through the esker system and into the bedrock aquifer. The tritium activity of water well samples from the vicinity of the esker system range from 64.54 to 0.0 T.U. away from the esker indicating relatively younger water is entering the Saginaw aquifer through the esker system. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT I would like to thank Dr. Grahame Larson, Dr. John Wilband, and Dr. Chip Prouty for the help and encouragement given to me in completing this project. A special thanks also for Bill (another plate full please), Ann, Dr. Bob, and the secretaries of zoology and geology for the moral support given to me through the years. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES iv LIST OF TABLES v INTRODUCTION 1 PHYSICAL SETTING 2 GLACIAL GEOLOGY 2 BEDROCK GEOLOGY 5 SURFACE DRAINAGE 6 DRIFT WATER TABLE 6 PIEZOMETRIC SURFACE OF THE SAGINAW FORMATION 10 HYDROLOGY OF THE EAST LANSING ESKER 12 USE OF TRITIUM FOR TRACING GROUNDWATER MOVEMENT l3 TRITIUM ANALYSIS l6 TRITIUM DISTRIBUTION IN THE STUDY AREA 18 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS 22 BIBLIOGRAPHY 25 APPENDIX A - PREPARATION OF STANDARDS 27 APPENDIX B - SAMPLE PREPARATION 31 APPENDIX C - COUNTING 37 APPENDIX D - TRITIUM COMPUTATIONS 49 WELL LOGS 112 APPENDIX E iii LIST OF TABLES TABLES PAGE TABLE I TRITIUM ACTIVITY IN RAINWATER 15 TABLE II TRITIUM DISTRIBUTION IN STUDY AREA 19 TABLE III HALF-LIFE TABLES OH 3H 30 TABLE IV H # VERSUS COUNTING EFFICIENCY 40 iv LIST OF FIGURES FIGURE 1. INGHAM COUNTY CITY AND TOWNSHIP INDEX 2. MERIDIAN TOWNSHIP SURFICIAL GLACIAL FEATURES 3. MERIDIAN TOWNSHIP BEDROCK LITHOLOGY 4. MERIDIAN TOWNSHIP BEDROCK TOPOGRAPHY 5. MERIDIAN TOWNSHIP DRIFT WATERTABLE 6. EASTERN LANSING AREA ACTUAL 1976 PIEZOMETRIC SURFACE 7. TRITIUM DECAY SCHEME 8. WATER WELL SAMPLING DISTRIBUTION 9. TRITIUM DISTRIBUTION IN STUDY AREA 10. PRE-DISTILLATION APPARATUS 11. POST-DISTILLATION APPARATUS 12. H # VERSUS EFFICIENCY 13. LS-BOOO PRINTOUT 14. NOMOGRAPH OF COUNTING RATE DETERMINATION INTRODUCTION The Saginaw formation is the major bedrock aquifer for Ingham County, Michigan. It was first penetrated by municipal water wells in Lansing around 1896, and since that time the formation has been the major source of water for the greater Lansing area (Stewart, 1945). Over the years, however, pumpage of the water from the aquifer has increased in response to continued urban and commercial growth. As a result, water withdrawal has exceeded recharge and has resulted in substantial lowering of the piezometric surface (Stewart, 1945. Firouzian, 1962. Mencenburg, 1963. Wheeler, 1968). Continued pumpage from this aquifer water may, in time, result in the depletion of the ground water resource. Artificial recharge may be a solution to the problem of dwindling water supply in the Saginaw formation. A necessary adjunct to this solution, however, would require identification of areas where geologic conditions favor hydraulic connection between the ground surface and the aquifer. One such area was identified by Mandel (1975) on the basis of drift and bedrock lithology and involves a partially mined out esker system in Meridian township, Ingham County. The esker lies approximately 4.8 km from the main pumping center in Lansing and is astride one of the main municipal pumping areas of Meridian township. Recent engineering studies have suggested that the esker can potentially supply 7.5 million gal/day to the Saginaw formation (Sutherland, 1977). In this investigation, tritium analysis of the groundwater associated with the esker system was used to confirm the presence or 1 2 absence of significant recharge into the aquifer at the esker site. The application isotopic the techniques in hydrologic studies is well documented (Thacher, 1971) and its usefulness in confirming recharge through drift is being increasingly recognized (Anderson, 1974). PHYSICAL SETTING Meridian township (Fig. l) is located in the northern half of Ingham County, Michigan. Within its borders are Michigan State University and the municipalities of East Lansing, Okemos, and Haslett. The northcentral region of the township is characterized by urban development whereas the southern region is mostly rural. In the northeastern section of the township lies Lake Lansing (Pine Lake on some maps) which is used chiefly for recreation. The Red Cedar River flows from east to west across the central part of the township and is currently not a source of water supply for any of the communi- ties in the township. Currently, the township is zoned for both multiple and single dwellings and is experiencing rapid urbanization. GLACIAL GEOLOGY Meridian township is underlain chiefly by glacial drift which was deposited by the Saginaw lobe during late Wisconsinan glaciation. Throughout most of the township it averages approximately 90 feet in thickness. Prominent glacial features occurring in the township are shown in figure 2 and include: 1) the Lansing moraine which originates just south of Lake Lansing and INGHAM COUNTY can no rowsmp morx F3 ,_ l LMMG IILLIAISTON LOCI! l ("W _ . ,r I» I'll/run!” m r I. Unborn/Ia D l ‘1 bum I Auutoou unrnnuo i LEROV l . i l 4; z y i I ; ? f D H000» A '1 '~0HAI 7 —‘ l IUIEUUS .Euv ’._J rm?! on _' (”flint/0 : I l 1 all 1 l , . l i | . l l ' % Mono“; I Lucia 3 aunt-mt. ; sroculmooc i B Lula I ' Sioclbr’fio D r r..- o— L. :1 MILES FIG I N HERIDIAN TOWNSHIP SURFACE GLACIAL FEATURES C: OTHER N FIG 2 5 extends westward through the southern half of Michigan State University, 2) the East Lansing esker which trends roughly north-south, its southern end terminating in the Lansing moraine and its northern end extending as far north as the intersection of Lake Lansing road and M-69, and (3) Lake Lansing, which is a kettle hole lake located in the northeastern quadrant of the township. The remainder of the township consists chiefly of minor outwash plains, ground moraine, and flood plain deposits of the Red Cedar River. BEDROCK GEOLOGY The Saginaw formation of Pennsylvanian age is directly under- lying the glacial deposits in Meridian township. This formation is the principal aquifer for the Lansing area and rests uncomfortably on the Bayport limestone which is of Mississippian age. The top of the Saginaw slopes roughly 400 feet per mile or slightly more than 1% grade in a NNW direction (Cohee, 1965). Regionally, the forma- tion is composed of beds of coal, shale, siltstone, sandstone, and minor amounts of limestone (Kelly, 1936). These tend to be lenticu- 1ar and nonpersistent which makes it difficult to correlate individual beds over extensive distances. The sandstone beds in the formation are generally less than twenty feet thick, but in the Lansing area they exceed 100 feet in thickness. Stewart (1945) and Firouzian (1963) found the transmissibility of the sandstone to be about 23,000 gpd/ft. Since the shale is relatively impermeable, the transmissibility of the aquifer is primarily a function of the total thickness of the sandstone. The bedrock topography and distribution 6 of sandstone and shales in Meridian township was mapped by Mandel on the basis of well logs and are shown in figures 3 and 4. SURFACE DRA INAG E The main drainage system of Meridian township is the Red Cedar River and its tributaries. The elevation of the river along the east side of the township is 845 feet. Where the river leaves the township six miles further west the river elevation is 825 feet. This represents an average river gradient of 0.45 degrees across the township. Lake Lansing, which lies in the north-east part of the township, drains through a man made outlet. The outlet enters the Red Cedar River between Okemos and the East Lansing esker. Lansing esker is cut by the river. The elevation of this confluence is about 835 feet. Sloan Creek and Button Drain enter the river 1/2 mile west of Vanatta Road and drain the southeastern part of the township. The other major stream that flows into the Red Cedar river is Herron Creek. It drains the south-west sections of the o township. THE DRIFT WATER-TABLE The drift water-table in Meridian Township is shown in Figure 5 and was produced primarily from information contained on U.S.G.S. 7.5 minute quadrangle topographic maps of the study area (U.S.G.S., 1976). It is based on the elevation of lakes, swamps, and ponds MERIDIAN TOWNSHIP BEDROCK Ll THOL 06 Y FIG. 3 MERIDIAN TOWNSHIP BEDROCK TOPOGRAPHY Ill" IO FRI? “TOUR ITINVAL FIG. 4 MERIDIAN TOWNSHIP DRIFT WATERTABLE MILES CONTOUR INTERVAL 5 FEET FIG. 5 10 within the township and closely conforms to the surface topography of the area. The average elevation of the drift water-table is about 850 ft. In general, it slopes toward the Red Cedar River and is highest near the southern part of the township. The lowest elevation of the drift water-table occurs where the Red Cedar passes through the west margin of the township. The drift water-table is also characterized by a cone of depression which is centered near the East Lansing Esker and the Red Cedar River flood planes. In the area of the esker, the water-table is represented by ponds occupying mined out portions of the esker. The elevation of the ponds both north and south of the Red Cedar is about 835 feet which is about the same as the elevation of the Red Cedar at the point where it crosses the esker. PIEZOMETRIC SURFACE OF THE SAG INAW FORMATION The piezometric surface of the Saginaw formation in Meridian township is shown in figure 6. This map was compiled by Van Till (1977) and is based on water level data from 42 city and municipal wells and 3 United States Geological Survey observation wells. A noteworthy feature of the piezometric surface in the township was the extension of the Lansing cone of depression into the west central portion of the township. Superimposed on this cone of depression is a smaller cone centered in East Lansing just north of the intersection of Bouge Street and Grand River Avenue. It is the result of pumping from an East Lansing municipal water well on the corner of Chittenden Street and Orchard Street. Another significant ll 1 EASTERN LANSING AREA I I ACTUAL ms nezourmc mac: ,5? \ . : ' \u I _-_._._._ _\_,___‘ ‘\.‘ 3 -' I (c; I — ; _ . 1 rT ‘_\-" l 1" ,1. '. -. '~ I l, “1 "‘o ‘ c.0000! damn! "can In tool. Donna is nun on level. 0 an!" I I — Figure 6.--Eastern Lansing area actual 1976 piezometric surface. 12 cone of depression occurs west of Lake Lansing and is the result of municipal pumping in the Haslett area. The gradient of the piezometric surface directly under the East Lansing esker is westward toward the Lansing cone of depression. This gradient is about 32 feet per mile (.43 degrees) north of the Red Cedar and five feet per mile (.21 degrees) south of the Red Cedar. THE HYDROLaI-Y 91: THE EAST LANSING ESKER The East Lansing esker (Fig. 2) in the study area is approximately 3 miles long and 300 to 350 feet wide, and in most places extends down to a hardpan clay or to the local bedrock. It lies slightly east of Park Lake Road and forms a long linear landform extending from just north of Haslett Road southward through the Grand River Avenue railroad overpass. From this point it continues southward across the Red Cedar River and terminates just north of the Lansing moraine between Mt. Hope Road and Bennett Road. The Red Cedar River flows normal to the esker near the railroad overpass and cuts the esker into two nearly equal segments. Only 30 years ago, the esker was a long, continuous narrow ridge composed chiefly of bedded sand and gravel which in places was up to 33 feet high. During the past several years, however, the esker has been mined for its gravels and sands and is now represented by a series of ponds occurring along the length of the esker. The vertical movement of water through the esker and into the underlying Saginaw aquifer is a function of the permeability of both 13 the material comprising the esker and the drift and bedrock underlying the esker. For example, shales and till directly underlying the esker are relatively impervious to the downward movement of groundwater. Sandstone, on the other hand, will transmit groundwater much more readily than shale or till and can act as a conduit for recharge into the bedrock aquifer system (Chow, 1964). Therefore, water movement within the esker can have two components: a predominantly vertical one over the sandstone bedrock and a predominantly horizontal one in those sections of the esker underlain by shale. THE USE OF TRITIUM FOR TRACING GROUNDWATER MOVEMENT Groundwater recharge through the East Lansing esker can be confirmed with the use of tracers. Traditionally tracers have been divided into categories by means of detection. For example, dyes by color, electrolytes by conductivity, and radioisotopes by nuclear radiations. Ideally, a tracer should accurately describe water flow for the system under study. This requires that the tracer in use does not appreciably change the hydraulic and chemical properties of the water or the transmission characteristics of the medium through which the water is flowing. Isotopes of hydrogen fulfill these requirements particularly well because they are part of the water molecule, and therefore, do not appreciably change the properties of water or the porous medium. Tritium in particular has an additional advantage in that it is radioactive and can, with proper instrumentation, be detected in minute quantities. It also occurs 14 naturally in the water cycle. Tritium is produced continuously in the upper atmosphere by cosmic radiation of 14W, when 14N nuclei are struck by neutrons produced by solar radiation or reaction of cosmic rays with other gasses in the upper stratosphere. One pair of possible reaction products is 3H (tritium) and 12C. The other reaction is the formation of 15N (Thacher, 1977). The 3H so formed combines readily with oxygen atoms in the stratosphere and mixes with molecular water in the atmosphere and on the surface of the earth. Analysis of natural water for tritium is based on the detection of the beta radiation which accompanies the radioactive decay of 3H (tritium) to 3H6 (helium). The decay scheme is shown in figure 7. Decay Sequence of Tritium 12.35 Years 3H B“ 0.018 Q=0.018 MeV. 100% Stable 3He Fig. 7 The utilization of tritium as a tracer assumes that it is being produced at a constant rate in the upper atmosphere and has reached a state of equilibrium between production and decay. The situation with regard to groundwater applications of 3H, however, has been dramatically altered by atmospheric nuclear weapons tests 15 the 1950's and 1960's. These tests introduced artificial 3H into the atmosphere in large quantities. Hence, during the early 1960's atmospheric tritium activity rose by several orders of magnitude. This rise is reflected in some natural environmental tritium activities shown in Table l (U.S.G.S., 1978). TABLE 1 YEAR ACTIVITY (RAINWATER) 1951 6 T.U. 1963 100-1000 T.U. 1968 90.5-191 T.U. 1969 86.6-410 T.U. 1970 83.7-248 T.U. 1971 43.7-332 T.U. 1972 35.0-162 T.U. 1973 39.8-126 T.U. 1974 28.5-146 T.U. 1975 26.3-131 T.U. 1976 29.1-72 T.U. 1977 31.4~106 T.U. 1978 65.2-124 T.U. Low levels of tritium, as shown above, are normally presented in terms of "tritium units" or "T. U.". One T. U. corresponds to a ratio of tritium atoms to hydrogen atoms of 10-18, that is: 1 T. U. = 3“ X 10.18 H The tritium unit is useful because it represents the order of magnitude of tritium in natural waters before contamination by the nuclear fusion weapons tests that have taken place since 1952 in the northern hemisphere. The T. U. is also convenient because it is approximately the limit of detectable activity using present day counting sytems. From studies of tritium levels in rain and ground waters such as rivers, lakes, or underground deposits, and taking 16 account of exchange and fractionation processes occurring during condensation, evaporation, and movement of water, it is possible to determine relative groundwater ages or the rates of flow of rain water into underground reservoirs. TRITIUM ANALYSIS A thorough surface reconnaisance of the East Lansing esker and the surrounding area was performed before a water sampling program was initiated. Well drillers logs were used to determine the eskers precise location in areas where changes in topography or the presence of urban development (lawns & streets) obscured the surface expression of the esker. Water samples for tritium analysis were taken from two sources in the area of the esker: 1) surface water which included rivers, ponds, and lakes, and 2) subsurface water from domestic and municipal water wells. Subsurface samples were taken only from wells which had been logged by the well driller. These drilling logs (APPENDIX C) provide information on well location, depth, material penetrated, and static water level. Most of the samples were from wells with depths of 140-160 feet. The resulting sampling pattern is shown in Figure 8 and the tritium values obtained are shown in Table II. Discussion of the reproducibility and analytical precision of the data are shown in Appendix D. 17 WATER WELL SAMPLING DISTRIBUTION we _1 O vuZO 8 «ISO 9 --_—-l -__-, waSO 11178210 .___ w s 20 0 Own 6 II . n I.’ II .II'I||.|,|,|||II| H . lll I 1,. II I‘, l 3?. 17 .17; 16 I ————— ... _._ _i—_ ——. . _—~*-__-. .— ... _.‘ o. _. __ _. _._ .- o -.__.-o-- . __._. _._. L _._-..- --_.. ._ __--_.- _-_--. . :_.-.'..._.'-l"'_-._-,___._..-......_ _— -g. ‘_-_...' 0'322 -...—...--. O was 27 Liz—L Ow: 23 W8 13 wl100 O O 14 21 ws 240 20 we 110 o 0 HM? Owe 25 DOMESTIC WATER WELL 0 MUNICIPAL WATER WELL 1. 4 ESKER §§::: FIG. 8 18 TRITIUM DISTRIBUTION IN THE STUDY AREA The tritium measured in water samples from the study area is shown in tabular form in Table 2 and is broken down into three categories: precipitation, surface waters, and sub-surface waters. The tritium activity for precipitation has only been measured in Lansing since December of 1979, but it corresponds closely to the U.S.G.S. values for precipitation in the Chicago area during 1978 (Table 1). Assuming that the tritium values from Chicago are a close approximation to the tritium values in the mid-Michigan area, we can use this data to infer the history of tritium in the precipitation in the study area. These values range from a high of 1000 T.U. in 1963 to a low of 6 T.U. in 1951. Subsequent to 1963, yearly lows and highs average about 65.5 T.U. to 186 T.U. respectively with a tendency to decay to lower values. This precipitation represents the input of recharge water in the study area. The samples from surface water are from Lake Lansing, the Red Cedar River, and the ponds along the axis of the esker. It is appa- rent that the tritium measured in these samples is approximately the same as that recorded for the 1979 - 1980 precipitation. The varia- tion between surface samples, however, is probably due to changes in tritium activity within precipitation over several years and the mixing of this water with older groundwater entering the ponds. It is also noteworthy that tritium measured in river water is also similar to that recorded in the precipitation. This is reasonable because, except in times of drought, the surface component of runoff 19 TABLE II TRITIUM VALUES IN THE STUDY AREA PRECIPITATION DATE T.U. 12/25/79 46.45 3/17/80 38.00 4/14/80 37.80 SURFACE WATER LOCATION . T.U. LAKE LANSING 58.54 1 9.27 POND # 2 - 56.83 :_9.01 POND # 3 40.86 1 6.99 POND # 5 63.55 :_10.23 POND # 6 37.96 i 6.11 POND # 7 37.69 :_6.09 RED CEDAR RIVER (SHORT ST. BRIDGE) 48.07 I 7.54 RED CEDAR RIVER (DAWN AVE.) 50.46 ’1 8.00 SUB-SURFACE WELL # DEPTH DIST. T.U. IN FEET FROM ESRER IN FEET WS-1 448 1400 12.52 t 2.38 WS-z 155 800 50.72 :_8.07 WS-3 160 500 51.75 1 8.32 ws-4 410 800 28.49 I 4.90 ws-s 185 1650 56.20 i 9.58 WS-6 413 750 ‘ 00.00 WS-7 413 800 12.52 i 2.38 WS-8 155 825 64.54 :_10.48 ws-9 150 750 44.66 + 7.59 WS-lO 155 800 64.54‘7 9.68 WS-ll 150‘ 500 41 99.3 4-07 WS-12 155 150 34.41 + 5.70 ws-13 140 50 44.70 E 7.63. ws-14 150 250 22.56 :_4.23 WS-15 140 300 58.63 + 9.21 WS-16 140 200 28.25 E 4.72 WS-l7 150 225 13.70 1 2.62 ws-18 120 375 18.11 + 3.39 ws-19 155 900 48.87:E 7.93 WS-20 135 2700 57.72 :_9.89 ws-21 150 5100 00.00 WS-22 160 1900 00.00 ws-23 155 3850 00.00 WS-24 120 5550 18.80 + 4.04 ws-25 125 4700 00.00 ’ ws-26 120 2800 7.63 + 2.25 WS-27 215 4450 00.00 20 dominates and we would expect to find tritium values close to those of the precipitation or higher than groundwater. The tritium distribution in sub-surface waters is best illustrated in figure 9 which shows that there are two areas of high tritium activity in the groundwater. The southern region shows values ranging from a high of 59 T.U. to a low of 0.0 T.U. with highest values being in the N.E. corner of section 20 and much lower values to the east and west. In the northern region the area of high tritium in the groundwater extends from the south central part of section 8 to the south central part of section 9 and has values from 64.56 T.U. to 0.0 T.U. The southern area of high tritium located in section 20 is clearly associated with the esker and represents recharge of high tritium precipitation in the Saginaw aquifer. In this area the sands and gravels of the esker are in direct contact with the underlying sandstone and thus this configuration forms a direct hydraulic conduit for flow of high tritium precipitation into the bedrock aquifer. The occurence of high tritium values just to the west of the esker suggests that subsequent movement of the water in the aquifer is toward the west in response to the cone of depression formed by pumping from the municipal water wells in the cities of Lansing and East Lansing. Unlike the area of high tritium in section 20, the northern area of high tritium in sections 8 and 9 appear to have no clear association with the East Lansing esker system. Here the aquifer is almost completely sealed by a layer Of shale 3 - 9 feet thick which precludes direct recharge into the underlying sandstone from the esker with the possible exception of WS-l and WS-2. 22 The possibility of leakage from the settling pond at the water treatment plant can also be excluded because the drift watertable slopes toward the southwest and would carry any high tritium waters from the ponds away from the wells indicating high tritium levels (WS-S and WS-20). However, a possible source of this high tritium groundwater is from lateral movement Of relatively young water into the area due to pumping of the Meridian township well field. The source of this water is probably to the north or northeast since water from WS-21 which is just east of this area has no measureable tritium. This is supported by the fact that the drift northeast of the area is composed chiefly Of permeable sandy drift in direct contact with the sandstone bedrock aquifer (Fig. 3). It is also interesting to note that this area Of drift has previously been identified as a potential area of high recharge (Mandle, 1975). SUMMARY AND CONCLUS IONS Meridian township is located in the northern half Of Ingham County, Michigan and is underlain chiefly by glacial drift deposited by the Saginaw lobe of the late Wisconsinan glaciation. Directly underlying these glacial deposits in Meridian township is the Saginaw formation whose sandstones form the principal aquifer for the Meridian township area. The township drift watertable closely conforms to the surface topography with the lowest elevations being along the Red Cedar River and the East Lansing esker. The piezometric surface of the township is characterized by a large cone of depression originating in the municipal well fields in the city 23 of Lansing. The East Lansing esker which is located in the west central part of Meridian township is about 3 miles long, from 300 - 350 feet wide, and extends down to a hardpan clay or to the local bedrock. This esker consists of bedded sands and gravels which represent a direct conduit from the surface to the bedrock. The lack of sample locations in sections 16 and 17 of the study area was a hindrance to the interpretation of the tritium data; nevertheless, the available data suggests either 1) separate areas of high tritium values or, 2) one long narrow belt of high tritium values sub-parallel to the esker system. Since the tritium activities in sections 8 and 9 were nearly equal to the activities found in sections 20 and 21 in spite of differing bedrock surface lithologies; it appears that there are two independent areas Of high tritium activity. The distribution of tritium in the groundwater in the study area has confirmed the presence Of recharge associated with the East Lansing esker system. In addition, this study has shown that tritium can be used to detect recharge in areas where there is no suggestion of recharge from surface morphology or soil information. It is also apparent that there may be no large regions of recharge in Meridian township but recharge may be confined to many areas of one or two hundred acres each which are scattered over the township or county. Tritium measurements for locating recharge areas and confirming groundwater movement has the potential to become a valuable tool for evaluating groundwater resources. This is especially true in areas with good well control. The technique is inexpensive because it 24 uses water from wells already in existence and drilling records of these wells are readily available which can provide accurate data for groundwater flow analysis. BIBLIOGRAPHY 25 BIBLIOGRAPHY Beckman 1978. LS 8000 Series Liquid Scintillation Systems, Beckman Instruments Division, Irvine, California. Boling, R. 1980. Derivation of error formulas. Personal Communication. Chow, V. T. 1964. Handbook of Applied Hydrology, McGraw-Hill. Cohee, G. V. 1965. Geologic History of the Michigan Basin. Journal Of Washington Academe of Science. v. 55, p. 211-223. Firouzian, A. 1963. Hydrological Studies of the Saginaw Formation in the Lansing, Michigan Area - 1968. Unpublished Master Of Science Thesis, Michigan State University. Hufen, T. H.. R. A. Duce and L. S. Lau. 1969. Some measurements of the tritium constant in the natural waters of southern Oahu, Hawaii. Technical Report no. 34. Phase II OWRR Project no. A-016-Hi. Jarrett, A. A. 1946. Statistical methods used in the measurement of radioactivity. Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Technical information Division. Oak Ridge, Tennessee AEC, Oak Ridge Tennessee. Kelly, W. A. 1936. The Pennsylvanian system in Michigan. Mich. Dept. of Conservation Geol. Survey Div. Pub. 40, Geol. Ser. 34, p. 155-219. Long, E. C. 1978. Liquid Scintillation Counting Theory and Techniques. Beckman Instruments Division, Irvine, California. Mandel, R. J. 1975. A computer assisted recharge evaluation of a drift-bedrock aquifer system. Unpublished M.S. Thesis. Michigan State University. Mencenberg, F. E. 1963. Groundwater geology of the Saginaw Group in the Lansing, Michigan area. Unpublished M.S. Thesis. Michigan State University. Ostlund, H. G. and Werner. 1962. The electrolytic enrichment of tritium and deuterium for natural tritium measurement. International Atomic Energy Agency. Vienna. Slayton, D. 1980. Tritium in rain water in mid-Michigan area. Personnel communication. Stuart, W. T. 1945. Groundwater resources of the Lansing area, Michigan. Mich. Geol. Survey Prog. RPT. l3. 26 Sutherland. J. C. and R. M. Bruce. 1977. Surface Water-Esker Recharge Study East Lansing - Meridian Township, Michigan. American Water Resources Association, Water Resources Bulletin, Vol. 13, no. 6. Thacher, L. L. 1967. Water tracing in the hydrologic cycle: Isotope Techniques in the Hydrologic Cycles, 97. U.S.G.S. 1978. Printout of tritium data for Chicago, 111. ID# 414643087443500. Venlier, K. W. and Wheeler, M. L. 1968. "Analog simulation of groundwater develOpment of the Saginaw formation, Lansing Metropolitan Area, Michigan." Prepared by U.S.G.S. in cooperation with Tri-County Planning Commission and Michigan Geological Survey. Van Til, Ronald. 1977. An analysis Of hydrologic simulation and groundwater withdrawal patterns in Eastern Lansing, Michigan. Thesis. Michigan State University. Wyerman, T. 1976. Laboratory facility for the analysis of natural levels of tritium in water. Open files report. U.S. Geological Survey. APPENDICES APPENDIX A PREPARATION OF STANDARDS 27 APPENDIX A PREPARATION OF STANDARDS INTRODUCTION Detection of natural tritium in ground water samples is difficult because of its low natural concentration (less than 1 T. U. in some ground water samples) and its low Beta emission spectrum (ave. = 0.018 MeV). For this reason all water samples relative to this investigation were subjected to a pre-counting enrichment process. The activity of an enriched sample can them be detected and measured by either a gas prOportional counter or a liquid scintillation counter. To use gas prOportional counting, however, the water samples must first be enriched and then converted to hydrogen gas. This counting technique is very sensitive and has low background counting rates but is very complicated and time consuming. Because liquid scintillation counting requires only that the enriched water sampels be mixed with a scintillation solution, it was chosen as the counting technique for this thesis research. ELECTROLYTIC ENRICHMENT Through electrolytic enrichment (Ostlund, 1964) the tritium in each water sample collected was concentrated to detectable levels. This procedure used a known standard (electrolysis standard) and blank which were processed with the unknown samples to compute the electrolysis efficiency for each batch of samples. For the electrolysis standard, a vial of tritiated water Of low volume and high activity was obtained from the National Bureau of Standards (N.B.S.). This tritium standard (primary standard) was used as a 28 base for preparation of a series of standards of high volume and low activity (secondary standards) which could serve as electrolysis standards. The primary standard was "cut" or diluted with water obtained from a 2030 foot well at the Thompson Fish Hatchery on the north shore of Lake Michigan. Analysis by the U.S. Geological Survey shows that this water contained no tritium and therefore could be used to dilute the N.B.S. tritiated water standard from 3.406 x 103 dps/ml (Sept. 3, 1978) in stages to get a final secondary standard of 2 dpm/ml. PREPARATION OF STANDARD To prepare the 2000 dpm tritium standard, the N.B.S. tritium was first corrected to reflect activity on the date the secondary standards were prepared (1/22/80). When the N.B.S. standard was recalibrated by N.B.S. on Sept. 3, 1978, its activity was 2.406 X 103 dps. Using the standard decay formulas of *A = Aoe'A 0‘ where: A = activity on date in question (1/22/80) A0 = activity when calibrated by N.B.S. A = decay constant, = 1n 2 t1/2 At = time difference (present time - calibration time). *Note: The activity of the N.B.S. standard is initially in dps/g and has been converted to dpm/g: A0 = (3.406 X 103)(60 sec.) A0 = 2.0436 x 1058pm. The half life (Fl/2) of tritium based on the N.B.S. 29 standard is 12.35 yrs., therefore the decay constant (4) equals the natural log of 2 divided by the t1/2 (in years) of tritium. A = .05612 Since the T1/2 is in years the time change (At) should also be given in the same units. The number of days which elapsed since calibration (3/9/78 to 1/22/80) is 498 days. Dividing 498 by 365 gives 1.3643 yrs. Hence: A = (3.0436 X lOSdpm/g)efiAtA or: A = 189064: 28 dpm/g Setting this up as a simple proportion we get: (1.89064 X 105 dpm/g)(tota1 mass of N.B.S. standard) = (2000 dpm/g)(mass Of N.B.S. standard + mass of the blank) or (1.89064 x 105dpm/g)(25 g) = (2000 dpm/g)(BLANK + 25 g). Solving this equation for BLANK gives the volume of BLANK that must be added to the N.B.S. standard or BLANK = 2338.3 g. This same procedure is used for the subsequent dilutions to 1000 dpm/g, 200 dpm/g and 2 dpm/g. Subsequent decay of these standards is determined by the use of the half-life decay table in table 2. 30 TABLE III HALF-LIFE TABLES OF 3H B 3H 3He E:max = 0.0186 MeV tL5 = 12.3 years At in Fraction At in Fraction Months Remaining Months Remaining 1 0.995 41 0.824 2 0.991 42 0.822 3 0.986 43 0.820 4 0.981 44 0.813 5 0.977 45 0.809 6 0.972 46 0.805 7 0.968 47 0.801 8 0.963 48 0.798 9 0.958 49 0.794 10 0.954 50 0.790 11 0.949 51 0.786 12 0.945 52 0.783 13 0.941 53 0.779 14 0.936 54 0.775 15 0.932 55 0.772 16 0.927 56 0.768 17 0.923 57 0.764 18 0.919 58 0.761 19 0.914 59 0.757 20 0.910 60 0.754 21 0.906 61 0.750 22 0.902 62 0.747 23 0.897 63 0.743 24 0.893 64 0.740 25 0.889 65 0.736 26 0.885 66 0.733 27 0.881 67 0.729 28 0.876 68 0.726 29 0.872 69 0.722 30 0.868 70 0.719 31 0.864 71 0.716 32 0.860 72 0.712 33 0.856 73 0.709 34 0.852 74 0.706 35 0.848 75 0.702 36 0.844 76 0.699 37 0.840 77 0.696 38 0.836 78 0.692 39 0.832 79 0.689 40 0.828 80 0.686 APPENDIX B SAMPLE PREPARATION 31 APPENDIX B SAMPLE PREPARATION INTRODUCTION The laboratory Operations for tritium analysis consist of pre-distillation, electrolysis, post-distillation, and scintillation counting. The amount of time required to process any batch of 9 to 12 samples is approximately 40 to 70 hours depending on the size Of the sample. PRE-DISTILLATION All water samples were ditilled in a closed system prior to electrolysis (Fig. 10). This distillation system consists of a boiling flask, Kjeidahl bulb, Allihn condenser, and a receiving flask. The laboratory, located in room 117 of the Natural Science Building, M.S.U., can process up to three samples at a time. All units, including the pressure compensators (balloons), are first completely dried under vacuum. Vacuum is then removed from all units and dry air is admitted. Following this, the boiling flask is removed from the lines, and the undistilled sample is poured into it. The flask is then immediately placed on the unit and vacuum reapplied. When the sample stops bubbling due to degassing, the vacuum is removed and dry air is admitted to avoid excessive bumping during distillation and to reduce the danger of implosion. The unit is then connected to a pressure compensator, heat is applied and distillation begun. If during distillation a pressure compensator indicates excessive pressure, either momentary vacuum is applied to 32 PRE-DISTILLATION APPARATUS .;1~. WATER OUT I I I KJEIDAHL BULB I 99)) I 7.4 I / I I BOILING FLASK // \\ 1 i I \ J/ I; I \ ALLIHN CONDENSER HEAT SOURCE WATER IN } k I 'I DRI-RITE . ‘ . IMA-~_\ (“g 4 | ‘ ' 1 ‘ . r“ -"—-“"-l ‘ x \ . ...._.--.._- --J \ \ .-.‘ ‘ ' I . ’ I . n ' / Ii .. THREE WAY \\ , CONNECTOR RECEIVING FLASK 1 5” PRESSURE COMPENSATOR \ -_.~__—- Fig. 10 33 that unit or the heat is lowered. Just before the water in the boiling flask completely evaporates, the heat is removed to permit any water in the Kjeldahl bulb to drain. A flame can be lightly applied to the bulb and the connecting glass to the top of the condenser to completely dry these sections. At this point heat is reapplied to the boiling flask and distillation is carried out to apparent dryness. To insure dehydrolyzation of salts, a final heating of several minutes after apparent dryness is applied to the boiling flask. If the pressure equilizer collapses due to cooling of a unit before the receiving flask is removed, dry air should be admitted to the unit. The receiving flask is then removed and stoppered. A clean boiling flask and receiving flask can then be placed on the unit and dried under a vacuum. Dry air may again be admitted if the unit is not immediately going to be used again. ELECTROLYSIS Water samples are electrolyzed in Ostlund cells (Fig. 11). A quantity of sample water (usually 160 m1) is first measured into a clean dry graduated cylinder. About 1 g (about 20 pellets) of NaOH is added to the electrolysis cell and the sample water is decanted into the cell. The cells are then stored in this condition for about 24 hours or until all the NaOH is dissolved. Failure to allow the NaOH to dissolve completely results in iron being pulled from the electrode causing the water to turn black. After all the NaOH is dissolved the electrodes are put into the cells and the electrical wires and gas exhausts are run through the special caps (Fig. 11). The cells are then placed in a water and glycol bath 34 which is maintained at about 4°C. The cells must sit for about 15 minutes in the water bath to cool after which the electrical service is hooked up. All the cells are wired in series with each other which insures that an equal amount of current will pass through each cell. The number of cells to be hooked together is dependent only on the capacity of the power supply. Each string of cells must contain at least one standard and one blank. The electrolysis current is based on a total electrode area of 35 cmZ/pr cell and a maximum current density of about 0.17 amps per cm2. Since electrolysis efficiency decreases as the electrolysis temperature increases and since heat dissipation through the glass cells is a function of the water level inside the cell, it is necessary to limit the heat by the electrolysis as the volume decreases. A circulation pump is used to provide good circulation of the coolant. This is needed to provide uniform electrolysis efficiency through the entire string of cells. The electrolysis continues until the level of liquid in the electrolysis tube falls to the end of the electrode. At that point the electrical and exhaust connections are removed, the electrolysis head is removed from the top of the cell, and a capped distillation head is substituted for it to minimize contamination by atmospheric tritium. POST-DISTILLATION The weighing bulbs are mounted on the post-distillation units prior to removing the Ostlund electrolysis cells from the water and glycol bath.‘ After removal from the bath the cells are separated 35 from their reservoirs and taps the electrode wires are coiled sufficiently to permit the distillation heads to be installed on the electrolysis cells. Each cell is then placed one at a time on a post-distillation unit and vacuum applied via the weighing bulb. When the water sample in the cell starts to bubble the vacuum is shut Off at the valve (Fig. 11). If the unit appears to be vacuum tight, the vacuum is shut Off at the valve, the weighing bulb is placed in liquid nitrogen, and a heat element is applied to the electrolysis cell. During distillation the heat is adjusted through a variac while the liquid nitrogen level in the Dewar flask is maintained just sufficiently high enough to prevent water condensation in the distillation head. When the water appears to have evaporated from a cell, the heating element is left on for another 1/2 hour to insure that all the sample water has been driven Off the NaOH. The weighing bulb is then closed, the heat turned off, and the liquid nitrogen removed. When the weighing bulb and its water content have reached approximately room temperature, dry air is admitted to the system as far as the weighing bulb and electrolysis cell. The weighing bulb is then closed again and removed from the system for weighing. Since the sample water volume may be less than 5 m1 transfer loss and potential contamination from air becomes important. After weighing the sample is poured directly into a pre-weighed Doro-silicate liquid scintillation vial. Six milliliters of Instagell is then added tO the sample. After sealing, the vial is shaken for about 10 seconds and left to stand at room temperature for about 10 minutes. To permit stabilization of the cocktail, the sample is placed in the dark for 24 hours before counting. 36 POST-DISTILLATION APPARATUS VACUUM EXHAUST WEIGHING BULB DISTILLATION HEAD \I‘ f ‘ i ‘1 I . DRI-RITE ‘ I 3 .f'; l i . i t. ELECTROLYSIS CELL LIQUID NITROGEN H-—.—_ g A-..__—— r _. Fig. 11 APPENDIX C COUNTING 37 THE SCINTILLATION PROCESS The decay of a radionuclide or radioisotope in a scintillation cocktail is accompanied by an ionization or excitation of molecules in the solution. Certain molecules in the medium can fluoresce when they interact with ionizing radiation. The liquid scintillation process depends on the critical interactions between the radioactive sample and the surrounding medium in which the sample is placed. COUNTING The counting of samples is performed on a Beckman LS 8000 liquid scintillation counter (LSC). This LSC uses photomultiplier tubes (PMT) to detect both the decay events in the samples to be tested and reduce background noise through coincidence counting circuits. If a beta decay event is detected by both PMTs, there is a high probability that there will be some pulses from the HMTS which wil be nearly simultaneous since the beta particle will produce a "burst" of photons. In a coincidence circuit, pulses from both PMTs within 20-30 nanoseconds Of one another produce a "coincidence signal". The coincidence signal is a new signal that is electrically sent to the coincidence gate. Pulses which are not within the 20-30 nanosecond "resolving time" do not produce a coincidence signal (Long, 1978). The LSC "channel one" tritium window was optimized to minimize background according to the Operator's manual (Beckman, 1977). The internal tritium program was modified to a counting time of 80 38 minutes and upper and lower channel limits of 220 and 120 respectively. OUENCHING The LSC is a "passive" Observer as it does not directly measure the presence of a radionuclide but merely the intereactions of that radionuclide with matter. Any component in the vial which interferes with these interactions produces a quenching effect. In other words, quench reduces the number Of photons that reach the photomultiplier tube. Air, water, and the sample itself can quench a sample. Specifically, quenching has two effects on a sample. It lowers observable counting rates and it also reduces the pulse heights of the higher energy beta particles. By reducing the overall photon output, quenching makes the data obtained by LSC ambiguous. If two samples give identical counting rates (the same total number of counts are Obtained per unit of time) two explanations are possible. One explanation is that both samples have exactly the same amount of radiOactive material and thus give identical counting rates on an LSC. A second possible explanation is that one sample may have considerably more radioactive material present but is more quenched so that the counting rate is reduced to that of the other sample. Similarly, two samples can conceivably give quite different counting rates, but in reality, have the same amount of radioactive material present, the one with the lower counting rate may have more quenching. Samples can be corrected for quench by monitoring the extent Of 39 acitvity in absolute units of disintegration per minute ( Based on the extent of quench, tie conversion of a sample to DPMs is related to the counting efficiency: counting efficiency = E£E_Z_§§E X 100% DPM If the counting efficiency of a sample is known and the counting rate is taken, then the actual activity (DPM) Of a sample can be calculated. The Beckman LS 8000 uses a method of quench monitoring called the H#. The H# represents the channel shift of the Compton edge between an unquenched nitrogen saturated tritium calibration standard and a quenched sample. To use the H# a set of unelectrolized counting standards of known activity and slightly different amounts of quenching agent were made. These standards are lowered into the counting well of the LSC and are bombarded by gamma rays of know flux from a 137Cs source which is positioned hydraulically near the samples. The gamma rays induce Compton radiation (electrons) in the scintillation solution. The inflection point of the Compton edge for the unquenched standard is noted in the LS 8000's memory. This procedure is repeated with the quenched standards. The quenching action in the scintillation solution will lower both the counting rate and the pulse height which results in a downward shift of the Compton edge. The resulting channel shift is the H#. The gamma ray source is then removed and the counting standard is counting normally after which the counting efficiency is 40 ncy is calculated using the above formula (Table 3). A curve is plotted with H# verse efficiency (Fig. 12). When the actual samples are counted an H# is generated which is unique to each sample and allows the counting efficiency of the unknowns to be Obtained TABLE 3 __ H# versus counting efficiency H# counting efficiency H# counting efficiency 85 .1499130090 101 .1436:.0095 90 .1480:.0081 109 .1418:.0087 95 .1458:.0101 117 .l374:.0099 directly from the quench curve or by linear interpolation of the H1} VERSUS EFFIC IENCY .1500 .1400 .1300 85 90 95 100 105 110 115 120 125 H# Fig. 12 41 nearest two bracketing points generated by the counting standards. ERROR IN COUNTING RATE All standards, samples, and blanks were tested to a 2 sigma counting error based on the actual counting data. This error deter- mination is built into the LS 8000's minicomputer using the formula: 2 (Z) = +.299_ —V Rt where R is the counting rate and t is the time counted (Beckman, 1978). An example Of an LS 8000 printout is shown in figure 13. It SAMPLE 1 P08 226 137 H# 2.254 SCR ELT 82.33 MIN CH 1 13.97 CPM 5.98 20% ST 80.00 MIN CH 2 31.50 CPM 3.98 20% Fig. 13 can be seen from the formula that the 2 sigma error can be improved by increasing the counting time for samples with low counting rates. When using this method the error is given in a_: % of 2 sigma confidence interval. A nomograph (Fig. 14) may be used to derive the counting error when using LS which do not have a minicomputer incorporated into them or when the error is desired in :_cpm (Jarrett, 1946). The nomographs Offer a high degree of precision, less chance for 42 was... 0.. am IOO,OOO ”if”, 5W3" 'h—SOO "I— ‘7- sopoo ,__‘_ wb zoo-“ _._zoo 20.000 .. IOO l 10,000 i 8 8 1111111111111 T'I'I‘I'I‘W T 2 so I I :O 0.8 on IO 8 0.: or O I t s 0.1 I I 8 FIGURE 14 THE 0.9 ERROR AND 0.95 ERROR OF COUNTING RATE DETERMINATIONS NSTRUCTU‘G 70R USE V'~‘O ”A!” t?! M A ")IY Ol 71‘ gt" VALE WE ‘KKD‘W 7° 7‘ m7.” ”Y! C‘ {y- '.."‘( new.» in: 'Qru on 7‘: lint! g--..( ”s‘.‘cp. I". Y0 M L! o‘J-n t1 1%: 'r: tutu. u; mguxg; “C '0'" "J; INS 1‘47)!!! 1N: fish‘: '0‘! CD‘S-WIS YO 7": a. (my. n.1,. hq ONE-MC! M 1170's sum cue-u- Mesmval‘ua“ m wmeoamm RI mum! win-dare III-u?! mun-noun!) mu nu Ian-J11. ~0- 0...... m: «h- 43 mistakes and ease of use by unskilled personnel. For example, using the data from figure 14, we have a counting rate of 13.97 cpm counted for 80 minutes. Using figure 14, locate the counting rate on the scale to the left and time counted on the scale to the right and connect them with a straight edge. At the point at which the straight edge intersects the middle scale we may read the effort of about i .8 cpm counting error or by multiplying the 2 (%) error on the tape (Fig. l) by the counting rate we get an eror of.: .835 cpm. This thesis will use the 2 (Z) error determination on the LSC due to its ease of comparison with samples of different counting rates. ERROR INTRODUCED BY BACKGROUND To determine the true counting rates of samples with low activities, allowance must be made for the background activity which may constitute a high percentage of the total sample activity. The background activity is the radiation present when a background standard is in the counting position. The background standard is exactly the same as the sample under investigation except that it contains no radioisotopes. In this thesis the background standard is made from the "blank" water obtained from the Thompson Fish Hatchery. True counting rate of a sample is derived by subtracting the background count from the sample in question. The true counting error of a sample must allow for the difference in counting errors between the sample and the background. True counting error may be found through the application of two formulas, one giving the answer in percent and the other in counts per minute. the formula for 44 percentage error is: \[<(CPms+b)(203+b<%m2 + ((cpmb)<2ob(z>)>2 (cpmS+b - Cpmb) :ZOSUO) = : (Beckman, 1978). For example, using the data gernerated from the electrolysis standard and counting standard from my first run: cpmstb = 27.46 cpm 2 8121) = 4.95% cmm 127cm1 6.772 2 b The above formula gives an answer in 3 S(%) but should it become desirable to have counting error in cpm we can use the formula: y (cpm) = K \[YRs/Ts + (Nb/Tb) where NS = counting rate of sample H II s time the sample is counted Nb = counting rate of background Tb = time the background is counted K = constant corresponding to desired error which in this case is the .955 error and K will equal 2. (Jerrett, 1946). Using the same data as before we have: NS = 27.46 cpm T = 59.41 min Ns = 7.27 cpm Tb ' 120 min k = 2 45 k = 2 y = 2 (27.46/59.4l) + (7.27/120.00) y = 1.41 or 20.19 i 1.41 Cpm The counting errors for all samples were calculated in this manner (Appendix D). TRITIUM COMPUTATIONS The activity (Aes) and electrolysis efficience (EEes) of the electrolysis standard must be computed before the raw data can be converted to tritium units. The counting efficiency is obtained by plotting the H# of the electrolysis standard on the quench curve or calculated by linear interpolation. The activity of the electrolysis standard is then calculated using: where CeS = counts of electrolysis standard B = background counts (from blank) Mass = mass of electrolysis standard counted eff = counting efficiency (from H#) Once the activity of the counting standard is known the electrolysis efficiency (EEes) of the standard is calculated using: EEeS = where Vf = final volume of electrolysis standard (after electrolysis) 46 V0 = final activity of electrolysis standard (after electrolysis) Aes = final activity of electrolysis standard (after electrolysis) Aoes = initial activity of electrolysis standard (about 2.01 dpm) Ddes = decay of Aoes since calibration (Table II) During electrolysis the gases bubbling through the liquid and escaping from the system carry away both water vapor and spray. This loss is compensated for by the Electrolysis Fractionation Factor (B) in which g = ln(VO/Vf)es 1n EE es where (Vo/Vf)es = concentration factor of electrolysis standard EEes = electrolysis efficiency of electrolysis standard Since the electrolysis cells are electrically connected in series, the current which caused the formation of these gases should produce the same amount of vapor loss in each cell. In reality, slight differences in vapor loss will occur due to placement of cells in the water bath (it is difficult to maintain uniform temperature distribution in the water bath), electron density due to slight differences in electrode areas, electrode spacing, and difference in the concentration factor. These differences cause variations in the value and differences in amount of electrolyte are shown when a calibration run of samples of know tritium content 47 are processed and the enrichment factors are calculated (Hufen, T. H., R. A. Fuce, and L. S. Lau, 1969). The calibration run on our equipment results in a beta of 12.63 :_.44 (10) for samples of 160 m1 initial volume and 5.23.: .66 (10) for samples of 100 ml initial volume. A sample of known tritium activity is always included when analyzing the water samples. The value obtained from this "electrolysis standard" is then used for the calculation of the sample water activities. Following convention (Wyerman, 1977), a sample run having a value deviating from the mean of the calibration run by more or less than one standard deviation will use the mean value of the calibration run to compute tritium values of that series of cells. The last factor to be calculated before processing the raw data for any sample is the Electrolysis Efficiency of the Sample (EES). This may be obtained from the formula: V 1%) in which At this point we can make calculations based upon the raw data from the individual samples. To do this we use the formula (cpm - bkgd)/maSS Actual dpm/s = (EES)(% eff)(CF) 48 where: cpm = sample counts bkgd 3 background counts from the blank Z efficiency = efficiency computed from the H# of each sample EEs = electrolysis efficiency of sample CF = concentration factor of the sample of (Vo/Vf). The reproducibility of the data was determined by comparing the measured tritium activity of a water sample from 4825 Mohican Dr. after three independent electrolysis runs. The mean of three activities measured was 45.42 T.U. with a variance of .6541 T.U. and standard deviation of .8088 T.U. The analytical precision of the sample analysis was determined through standard methods used to measure the maximum uncertainties of directly measured quantities. In addition, two formulas were used to calculate the uncertainty in the calculation of the electrolysis efficiency (EEes) and the electrolysis fractionation factor (Boling, personal communication). These formulas are respectively: _._AL... ___1____ 8(1 + AB) 8(1 + AB) VO 1 + AVo AEE = -—- X --—-’- - l s Vf l + AVf ln(l + AV ) - 1n(1 + AV ) - Bln(l + AEE ) AB _ f o s In Vf - ano + Bln(l + EES) On the basis of calculations from the above formulas it was determined that the precision of the samples run on the system was in the area of 152. APPENDIX D TRITIUM COMPUTATIONS 49 TRITIUM COMPUTATIONS The activity (Aes) and electrolysis efficience (EEes) of the electrolysis standard must be computed before the raw data can be converted to tritium units. The counting efficiency is obtained by plotting the H# of the electrolysis standard on the quench curve or calculated by linear interpolation. The activity of the electrolysis standard is then calculated using: = (Ces - B)/Mass eff where Ces = counts of electrolysis standard A es B background counts (from blank) Mass - mass of electrolysis standard counted eff counting efficiency (from H#) Once the activity of the counting standard is known the electrolysis efficiency (EEes) of the standard is calculated using: V0 /. EE = ___ es es V \Aoes f where Vf = final volume of electrolysis standard (after electrolysis) V0 = final activity of electrolysis standard (after electrolysis) Aes = final activity of electrolysis standard (after electrolysis) Aoes = initial activity of electrolysis standard (about 2.01 dpm) Ddes = decay of Aces since calibration (Table II) 50 During electrolysis the gases bubbling through the liquid and escaping from the system carry away both water vapor and spray. This loss is compensated for by the Electrolysis Fractionation Factor (B) in which 1n(VO/Vf)es B = 1n EE _ - es where (VO/Vf)es = concentration factor of electrolysis standard BEES = electrolysis efficiency of electrolysis standard Since the electrolysis cells are electrically connected in series, the current which caused the formation of these gases should produce the same amount of vapor loss in each cell. In reality, slight differences in vapor loss will occur due to placement of cells in the water bath (it is difficult to maintain uniform temperature distribution in the water bath), electron density due to slight differences in electrode areas, electrode spacing, and difference in the concentration factor. These differences cause variations in the value and differences in amount of electrolyte are shown when a calibration run of samples of know tritium content are processed and the enrichment factors are calculated (Hufen, T. H., R. A. Fuce, and L. S. Lau, 1969). The calibration run on our equipment results in a beta of 12.63 i .44 (10) for samples of 160 ml initial volume and 5.23 i .66 (10) for samples of 100 ml initial volume. A sample of known tritium activity is always included when analyzing the water samples. The value obtained from this "electrolysis standard" is then used for the calculation of the sample water activities. Following convention (Wyerman, 1977) 51 sample water activities. Following convention (Wyerman, 1977), a sample run having a value deviating from the mean of the calibration run by more or less than one standard deviation will use the mean value of the calibration run to compute tritium valuesof that series of cells. The last factor to be calculated before processing the raw data for any sample is the Electrolysis Efficiency of the Sample (EES). This may be obtained from the formula: __1. 8 V0 EE - n s S Vf in which At this point we can make calculations based upon the raw data from the individual samples. To do this we use the formula (cpm - bkgd)/mass Actual dpm/g = (EES)(% eff)(CF) where: cpm = sample counts bkgd = background counts from the blank Z efficiency = efficiency computed from the H# of each sample EES = electrolysis efficiency of sample CF concentration factor of the sample of (VO/Vf). mass mass of sample counted 160 ml 8 CALIBRATION 52 COUNTY TOWNSHIP SECTION __ k/R/k STREET ADDRESS DATE NOV. 30L 1980 SAMPLE # B CALIBRATION RUN # TUBE # 2 ELECTROLYSIS MASS 0R VOLUME 160.:.°005 g/mi ELECTROLYSIS EFFICIENCY OF ELECTROLYSIS STANDARD = EEes ~8100.:.-0701 ENRICHMENT FACTOR = B = 12.47.:,-4709 ELECTROLYSIS EFFICIENCY OF SAMPLE = EES = POST DISTILLATION MASS OF WEIGHING BULB + SAMPLE 102.8§ + ,QQ§ g MASS OF WEIGHING BULB 91.31 i .005 s MASS OF SAMPLE 11.55 i .01 g \ CONCENTRATION PACTOR= $23: EETERE 13.85 + .0124 MASS OF SAMPLE MASS 0F VIAL + SAMPLE MASS OF VIAL Z MASS OF SAMPLE 5-00 + -005 3 DATA cpm H# Z efficiency count time 23.33 94.33 .1461 i .0098 240 BACKGROUND 7'01 cpm count time (background) 720 NET COUNT with 2 sigma error 16°32.i.-0954 cpm DATA CORRECTED (for L5 counter efficiency, electrolysis efficiency, and concentration factor) (net count)/mass of sample = (Z efficiency)(EES)(C.F.) ACTUAL dpm/g = dpm/g .0071 53 COUNTY TOWNSHIP - SECTION __ Elk/k STREET ADDRESS DATE NOV. 30, 1980 SAMPLE # B CALIBRATION RUN # TUBE # 37 ELECTROLYSIS MASS OR VOLUME 160.:.-005 g/ml ELECTROLYSIS EFFICIENCY OF ELECTROLYSIS STANDARD = EEes -8112 i1-0642 BNRICHMENT FACTOR = B = 12.32 i .2223 ELECTROLYSIS EFFICIENCY OF SAMPLE =3 EEs == POST DISTILLATION MASS 0F WEIGHING BULB + SAMPLE 99.71 :;,005 s MASS OF WEIGHING BULB 88.77 + .005 g MASS OF SAMPLE 10.94 + .01 g MASS BEFORE CONCENTRATION FACTOR= MASS AFTER 14.62 + .0138 MASS OF SAMPLE MASS 0F VIAL + SAMPLE g MASS OF VIAL g MASS 0F SAMPLE 5°00.i.-005 g DATA cpm H# Z efficiency count time 24.31 93.33 .1465 i .0095 240 BACKGROUND 7'01 cpm count time (background) 720 NET COUNT with 2 sigma error 12,30 + -2023 cpm DATA CORRECTED (for LS counter efficiency, electrolysis efficiency, and concentration factor) (net count)/mass of sample = (Z efficiency)(EES)(C.F.) ACTUAL dpm/g = dpm/g .0071 T.U. 54 COUNTY TOWNSHIP SECTION __ k/E/k STREET ADDRESS DATE 1x1le 39 193;) . SAMPLE # g CALIBBAIIQN RUN # TUBE {l 40 ELECTROLYSIS MASS 0R VOLUME 160 + .005 g/ml ELECTROLYSIS EFFICIENCY OF ELECTROLYSIS STANDARD = EBes .8168 + .0699 ENRICHMENT FACTOR = B = 12.68 i .4984 ELECTROLYSIS EFFICIENCY OF SAMPLE = EES = POST DISTILLATION MASS 0F WEIGHINC BULB + SAMPLE 103-83 i1'005 3 MASS OF WEIGHING BULB 91.93L.005 8 MASS OF SAMPLE 11-35 I m g MASS BEFORE CONCENTRATION FACTOR— MASS AFTER 13,5(1 _i 9020 MASS OF SAMPLE MASS OF VIAL + SAMPLE g MASS OF VIAL g MASS OF SAMPLE 5.00;: .005 3 DATA cpm H# Z efficiency count time 15.03 94.33 .1461 i .0098 240 BACKGROUND 7.01 cpm count time (background) 720 NET COUNT with 2 sigma error 8.02 + .1268 cpm DATA CORRECTED (for LS counter efficiency, electrolysis efficiency, and concentration factor) (net count)/mass of sample _ ACTUAL dpm/8 ’ (% efficiency)(EES)(C-F-) dpm/g .0071 55 COUNTY TOWNSHIP SECTION.__ k/k/k STREET ADDRESS DATE NOV- 30. 1980 SAMPLE # B CALIBRATION RUN # TUBE # 6 ELECTROLYSIS MASS 0R VOLUME 160 i .005 g/ml ELECTROLYSIS EFFICIENCY OF ELECTROLYSIS STANDARD = EEe .7371 :;.0569 S ENRICHMENT FACTOR = 8 = 8.760 + .2194 ELECTROLYSIS EFFICIENCY OF SAMPLE = EES = POST DISTILLATION MASS 0F WEICHING BULB + SAMPLE 103.51.:. 005 g MASS 0F WEICHINC BULB 97145;: ~005 g MASS 0F SAMPLE 11 05 + f9; 8 3 “Ass BEFORE 14.47 + .0140 CONCENTRATION FACTOR MASS AFTER _. MASS OF SAMPLE MASS OF VIAL + SAMPLE g MASS OF VIAL 8 MASS OF SAMPLE 45400 + ‘QQS g DATA cpm # Z efficiency count time 22.59 92.67 .1468 :fi.0092 240 BACKGROUND 7.01 cpm count time (background) 720 NET COUNT with 2 sigma error 15.58 + .1893 cpm DATA CORRECTED (for L8 counter efficiency, electrolysis efficiency, and concentration factor) _ (net count)/mass of sample _ ACTUAL dpm/g ‘ % efficienCY)(EEs)(C.F.) dpm/g .0071 T.U. 56 COUNTY TOWNSHIP SECTION.__ MIR/M STREET ADDRESS DATE NQY. 39. 1939 . SAMPLE # B CALIBRATION RUN # TUBE 5 ELECTROLYSIS MASS OR VOLUME 160 + .005 g/ml ELECTROLYSIS EFFICIENCY OF ELECTROLYSIS STANDARD = EEes .7670 i .0773 ENRICHMENT FACTOR = B = 9-729 i .3872 ELECTROLYSIS EFFICIENCY OF SAMPLE = EES = POST DISTILLATION MASS OF WEICHINC BULB + SAMPLE 103-40 i:-005 g MASS OF WEICHINC BULB 91-29 + .005 g MASS OF SAMPLE .12111'E'-01 g MASS BEFORE CONCENTRATION FACTOR- MASS AFTER 13121.$;-0112 MASS 0F SAMPLE MASS 0F VIAL + ssuPLE g MASS 0F VIAL B MASS 0F SAMPLE 5.00 i .005 g DATA cpm H# X efficiency count time 10.69 94.67 .1459 + .0100 240 BACKGROUND 7-01 cpm count time (background) 720 NET COUNT with 2 sigma error 3-68 i.°0912 cpm DATA CORRECTED (for L8 counter efficiency, electrolysis efficiency, and concentration factor) (net count)/mass of sample = (Z efficiency)(EES)(C.F.) dpm/g ACTUAL dpm/g = .0071 T.U. 57 COUNTY TOWNSHIP SECTION __ k/M/k STREET ADDRESS DATE NOV- 30. 1980 SAMPLE # B CALIBRATION RUN # TUBE # 7 ELECTROLYSIS MASS 0R VOLUME 160-i-'°°5 g/ml ELECTROLYSIS EFFICIENCY OF ELECTROLYSIS STANDARD = BEes .8202 + .4834 ENRICHMENT FACTOR a 8 = 13.26 + .4834 ELECTROLYSIS EFFICIENCY OF SAMPLE = EES = POST DISTILLATION MASS 0F WEIGHINC BULB + SAMPLE 102-86 :1o005 g MASS 0F WEICHINC BULB 91-3I.i.-005 g MASS OF SAMPLE 11455.:.-01 8 A ”A35 BEFORE 13.85 + .0124 CONCENTRATION FACTOR MASS AFTER __ MASS 0F SAMPLE MASS 0F VIAL + SAMPLE g MASS 0F VIAL g MASS 0F SAMPLE 5-00 + Lane 8 DATA cpm H# Z efficiency count time 11.15 93.67 .1464,:_.0096, 1240 BACKGROUND 7.01 cpm count time (background) 720 NET COUNT with 2 sigma error 4.14 + .0949 cpm DATA CORRECTED (for LS counter efficiency, electrolysis efficiency, and concentration factor) (net count)/mass of sample = ACTUAL dpm/8 = % efficiency)(EES)(C.F.) dpm/g .0071 T.U. 58 COUNTY TOWNSHIP SECTION __ k/E/M STREET ADDRESS DATE NOV. 30, 1980 SAMPLE # B CALIBRATION RUN ii TUBE # 4 ELECTROLYSIS MASS 0R VOLUME 160 i -005 g/ml ELECTROLYSIS EFFICIENCY OF ELECTROLYSIS STANDARD = EEes -7005:: ~0907 ENRICHMENT FACTOR = B = 1 54 .1. 3999 ELECTROLYSIS EFFICIENCY OF SAMPLE = EEs = POST DI STILLATION MASS OF WEIGHING BULB + SAMPLE 99.68: .005 g MASS OF WEIGHING BULB 88.76; .005 8 MASS OF SAMPLE 10.92 i .01 8 . MASS BEFORE CONCENTRATION FACTOR MASS AFTER 14.65 + .0139 MASS OF SAMPLE MASS OF VIAL + SAMPLE g MASS OF VIAL 8 MASS OF SAMPLE 5.00 + .005 g DATA cpm Hi} 7. efficiency count time 10.76 i .21 92.67 .1468 i .0092 240 BACKGROUND 7°01 cpm count time (background) 720 NET COUNT with 2 sigma error 3-75 i -0918 cpm DATA CORRECTED (for LS counter efficiency, electrolysis efficiency, and concentration factor) (net count)/mass of sample _ (% efficiency)(EES)(C.F.) dpm/8 ACTUAL dpm/g = .0071 *3 Ci 59 COUNTY TOWNSHIP SECTION __ Elk/k STREET ADDRESS DATE NOV. 30, 1890 SAMPLE # 8 CALIBRATION RUN if TUBE 21 ELECTROLYSIS MASS 0R VOLUME 160 :_-005 g/ml ELECTROLYSIS EFFICIENCY OF ELECTROLYSIS STANDARD = EEes -7914 t .0667 ENRICHMENT FACTOR = 8 = 11-68;: .3786 ELECTROLYSIS EFFICIENCY OF SAMPLE = EES = POST DISTILLATION MASS 0F WEIGHINC BULB + SAMPLE 102.37 + ,QQ§ g MASS 0F WEICHING BULB 91.97 i .005 8 MASS OF SAMPLE 10.40 i .01 8 g _ MASS BEFORE CONCENTRATION FACTOR- MASS AFTER 15.38 + .0153 MASS OF SAMPLE MASS OF VIAL + SAMPLE g MASS OF VIAL 8 MASS OF SAMPLE 5.00 + .005 3 DATA cpm H# Z efficiency count time 15.87 + .26 94 .1462 :;:0097 240 BACKGROUND 7-01 cpm count time (background) 720 NET COUNT with 2 sigma error 8-86.:.-1337 cpm DATA CORRECTED (for L3 counter efficiency, electrolysis efficiency, and concentration factor) (net count)/mass of sample = (Z efficiency)(EES)(C.F.) ACTUAL dpm/g = dpm/8 .0071 100 ml 8 CALIBRATION 60 COUNTY TOWNSHIP SECTION __ MIR/k STREET ADDRESS DATE NOV. 30, 1980 SAMPLE # B CALIBRATION RUN # 5-2 ELECTROLYSIS MASS 0R VOLUME 100-09.:.-005 g/ml ELECTROLYSIS EFFICIENCY OF ELECTROLYSIS STANDARD = EEeS .5664 :1-0465 ENRICHMENT FACTOR = 8 = 5-16.:.-0696 ELECTROLYSIS EFFICIENCY OF SAMPLE = EES = POST DISTILLATION MASS OF WEIGHING BULB + SAMPLE 97.80 :{.005 g MASS OF WEIGHING BULB 92.43 1;.005 8 MASS OF SAMPLE 5.37 + .01 8 MASS BEFORE CONCENTRATION FACTOR- MASS AFTER 18.83 + .0180 MASS OF SAMPLE MASS OF VIAL + SAMPLE 20.90 + .005 g MASS 0F VIAL 15.83 + .005 g MASS OF SAMPLE 5.07 + .005 g DATA cpm # 2 efficiency count time 21.50 96 '1454.:.'0100 320 BACKGROUND 6'13 cpm count time (background) 320 NET COUNT with 2 sigma error 15-37.i.'5880 cpm DATA CORRECTED (for L8 counter efficiency, electrolysis efficiency, and concentration factor) (net count)/mass of sample _ (z efficiency)(EES)(C.F.) dpm/g ACTUAL dpm/g = .0071 T.U. 61 COUNTY TOWNSHIP SECTION __ Elk/k STREET ADDRESS DATE NOV. 30, 1980 SAMPLE # B CALIBRATION RUN # 5-3 ELECTROLYSIS MASS 0R VOLUME 99-85.:.-005 g/ml ELECTROLYSIS EFFICIENCY . 0F ELECTROLYSIS STANDARD = EEes -6646.i.-0537 ENRICHMENT FACTOR = B = 7.33 + 111961 ELECTROLYSIS EFFICIENCY OF SAMPLE = EES = POST DISTILLATION MASS OF WEIGHING BULB + SAMPLE 93.82 i .005 8 MASS OF WEIGHING BULB 88.81 1;.005 8 MASS OF SAMPLE 5.01 + .01 8 MASS BEFORE CONCENTRATION FACTOR= MASS AFTER 19.93 + .0408 MASS OF SAMPLE MASS 0F VIAL + SAMPLE 20.76 + .005 g MASS 0F VIAL 15.77 + .005 g MASS 0F SAMPLE 4.99 + .005 g DATA cpm H# X efficiency count time 25.11 96 .1454:: .0100 320 BACKGROUND 6'13 cpm count time (background) 320 NET COUNT with 2 sigma error 18°98 i '1615 cpm DATA CORRECTED (for LS counter efficiency, electrolysis efficiency, and concentration factor) (net count)/mass of sample _ (Z efficiency)(EES)(C.F.) dpm/g ACTUAL dpm/g = .0071 T.U. 62 COUNTY TOWNSHIP SECTION __ k/k/k STREET ADDRESS DATE NOV. 30, 1980 SAMPLE # B CALIBRATION RUN # 5-1 ELECTROLYSIS MASS 0R VOLUME 99-98.:.-005 g/ml ELECTROLYSIS EFFICIENCY OF ELECTROLYSIS STANDARD = EEes ~6025.i.-0073 ENRICTUIENT FACTOR = 6 = SIMPLE-L085; ELECTROLYSIS EFFICIENCY OF SAMPLE = EBS -—- POST DISTILLATION MASS 0F WEICHINC BULB + SAMPLE 94 93 i 995 g MASS 0F WEICHING BULB 8§.§; E ,Q95 3 MASS 0F SAMPLE 5.22fi: .01 8 MASS BEFORE 'T‘ b a . . CONCENTRA-IOI FACTOR MASS AFTER 19 15 + 0376 MASS 0F SAMPLE MASS 0F VIAL + SAMPLE 20.98 + .005 g MASS 0F VIAL 15.90 + .005 g MASS 0F SAMPLE 5.08 + .005 g DATA cpm H# Z efficiency count time 23.01 95 .1458 1 .0101 320 BACKGROUND 6°13 cpm count time (background) 320 NET COUNT with 2 sigma error 16-88.i.-1483 cpm DATA CORRECTED (for LS counter efficiency, electrolysis efficiency, and concentration factor) (net count)/mass of sample _ ACTUAL dpm/8 = (z efficiency)(EES)(C.F.) dpm/g .0071 63 COUNTY TOWNSHIP SECTION __, k/M/B STREET ADDRESS DATE NOV. 30, 1980 SAMPLE # 8 CALIBRATION RUN # 5-4 ELECTROLYSIS MASS 0R VOLUME 99-98.i. 005 g/ml ELECTROLYSIS EFFICIENCY OF ELECTROLYSIS STANDARD = EEes -5833 i:-0476 ENRICHMENT FACTOR = 8 = 5-354 i -0925 ELECTROLYSIS EFFICIENCY OF SAMPLE = EEs = POST DISTILLATION MASS OF WEICHING BULB + SAMPLE 98.01 i .005 8 MASS 0F WEIGHING BULB 92.42;: .005 s MASS 0F SAMPLE 5.58 i .01 8 MASS BEFORE CONCENTRATION FACTOR= MASS AFTER 17.92;: .0330 MASS 0F SAMPLE MASS 0F VIAL + SAMPLE 20.86 + .005 g MASS 0F VIAL 15.80 + .005 g MASS OF SAMPLE 5.06 + .005 8 DATA cpm H# Z efficiency count time 21.36 95 .1458_: .0101 320 BACKGROUND 6-13 cpm count time (background) 320 NET COUNT with 2 sigma error 15°23.i.-1389 cpm DATA CORRECTED (for LS counter efficiency, electrolysis efficiency, and concentration factor) (net count)/mass of sample _ (Z efficiency)(EES)(C.F.) dpm/g ACTUAL dpm/g = .0071 T.U. WORK SHEETS 64 COUNTY INGHAM TOWNSHIP MERIDIAN SECTION 2_0_ La/‘m/‘c STREET ADDRESS 4825 MOHICAN DATE NOV- 12. 1980 OKEMOS SAMPLE #WS-9 RUN f; ELECTROLYSIS STD. ELECTROLYSIS MASS OR VOLUME 150 +gAnn§ g/ml ELECTROLYSIS EFFICIENCY OF ELECTROLYSIS STANDARD = EEes ENRICMMENT FACTOR = 8 = 11,14 i .1938 ELECTROLYSIS EFFICIENCY OF SAMPLE = EES = .7898 i .0398 POST DISTILLATION MASS OF WEICHING BULB + SAMPLE 102.86 + .005 g MASS 0F WEIGHING BULB 91.31 + .005 g MASS OF SAMPLE 11.55 + .005 g MASS BEFORE .. 13.8 + . 12 CONCENTRATION FACTOR MASS AFTER 5 _ 0 4 MASS OF SAMPLE MASS OF VIAL + SAMPLE g MASS OF VIAL 8 MASS OF SAMPLE 73-00 i 307 8 DATA cpm H# Z efficiency count time 9.64 93.67 .1464 i .0096 240 BACKGROUND 7'01 cpm count time (background) 400 2.63 i .0876 NET COUNT with 2 sigma error cpm DATA CORRECTED (for LS counter efficiency, electrolysis efficiency, and concentration factor) (net count)/mass of sample = .3285 i .0331 ’ . _ dpm/8 (Z \ IL I o o (A effiCienc1)( BS)\C F ) .0071 ACTUAL dpm/ g = 46.27 + 4.66 T.U. 65 COUNTY INGHAM TOWNSHIP MERIDIAN SECTION _20 EPA/‘4. STREET ADDRESS 4825 MOHICAN DATE Nov. 10, 1980 OKEMOS SAMPLE # ws-9 RUN #14 ELECTROLYSIS MASS OR VOLUME 160 i .005 g/ml ELECTROLYSIS EFFICIENCY OF ELECTROLYSIS STANDARD = EEeS ENRICHMENT FACTOR = B = 912055+ 11906 ELECTROLYSIS EFFICIENCY OF SAMPLE = EES = 41081 +4J0552 POST DISTILLATION MASS OF WEIGHING BULB + SAMPLE 99.20 + +005 g MASS 0F WEIGHING BULB 92.49 E .005 8 MASS OF SAMPLE 6.71;.01 g MASS BEFORE , '7' a CONCENTRATION FAC.OR MASS AFTER 23.99 + .0365 MASS OF SAMPLE MASS OF VIAL + SAMPLE 20.08 + .005 g MASS OF VIAL 15.76 + .005 g MASS 0F SAMPLE 5.11 + .005 g DATA cpm H# Z efficiency count time 10.52 96.5 .1453;: .0100 320 BACKGROUND 6'52 cpm count time (background) 320 NET COUNT with 2 sigma error 4°00.i.-0774 cpm DATA CORRECTED (for L3 counter efficiency, electrolysis efficiency, and concentration factor) (net count)/mass of sample = .3171 + .0539 Z efficiency)(EES)(C.F.) 6671 ACTUAL dpm/g = dpm/g 44.66 i 7.59 T.U. 66 COUNTY INGHAM TOWNSHIP MERIDIAN SECTION 2_o LIPA/‘4. STREET ADDRESS 4825 MOHICAN DATE NOV. 10, 1980 OKEMOS SAMPLE # ws-9 RUN # 2 ELECTROLYSIS MASS OR VOLUME 160.: -005 g/ml ELECTROLYSIS EFFICIENCY OF ELECTROLYSIS STANDARD = EE es ENRICHMENT FACTOR = 8 = 8°606 i1°1510 LECTROLYSIS EFFICIENCY OF SAMPLE = EES = .6913,+ .0590 POST DISTILLATION MASS OF WEIGHING BULB + SAMPLE 97.28 iLAOQS 8 MASS OF WEIGHING BULB 92.43 i; 005 g MASS OF SAMPLE 4.85 i 01 8 MASS BEFORE ‘m L = 2. . CONCENIRATION FACTOR MASS AFTER 3 98 i; 0690 MASS OF SAMPLE MASS OF VIAL + SAMPLE 20.55 + .005 g MASS OF VIAL 15.79 + .005 g MASS 0F SAMPLE 4-76 + -005 8 DATA cpm H# Z efficiency count time 11.85 95.5 .1456 i .0100 320 BACKGROUND BASS, cpm count time (background) 329 NET COUNT with 2 sigma error 5430 + #3346 cpm DATA CORRECTED (for L8 counter efficiency, electrolysis efficiency, and concentration factor) (net count)/mass of sample _ A - . - 13354 + I0581 (A efficiency)(EES)(C.F.) .0071 ACTUAL dpm/g = dpm/g 45.33 :_8.18 T.U. 67 COUNTY TOWNSHIP SECTION __ k/E/E STREET ADDRESS DATE NOVA 10; 1980 SAMPLE # E12ctr01¥sjs Std RUN # l, ELECTROLYSIS MASS OR VOLUME 16Q:.QOS 8/ml ELECTROLYSIS EFFICIENCY OF ELECTROLYSIS STANDARD = EEes .712Q:.0566 ENRICHMENT FACTOR = 8 = . 8.838+.1915 ELECTROLYSIS EFFICIENCY OF SAMPLE = EEs = POST DISTILLATION MASS OF WEIGHING BULB + SAMPLE 97 72+ 005 S MASS OF NEICHING BULB - .i- 8 MASS OF SAMPLE 7 95 '91 8 MASS BEFORE CONCENTRATION FACTOR= MASS AFTER 205L2A: 0259 MASS OF SAMPLE MASS OF VIAL + SAMPLE 20-7S+-OOS S MASS 0F VIAL 11771005 is MASS OF SAMPLE 4-98;;005 S DATA cpm Hfl Z efficiency count time 27.22 97 .1451: 0099 320 BACKGROUND 6.77 cpm count time (background) 320 NET COUNT with 2 sigma error20.45+.1753 cpm DATA CORRECTED (for LS counter efficiency, electrolysis efficiency, and concentration factor) , (net count)/mass of sample A I 4 0 = ‘ - = “CTUAL “pm’° z efficiency)(EEs)(C.F.) 0071 dpm/g .U. *3 68 COUNTY TOWNSHIP SECTION __ k/E/k STREET ADDRESS DATE SAMPLE # Blank RUN # 1 ELECTROLYSIS MASS OR VOLUME g/ml ELECTROLYSIS EFFICIENCY OF ELECTROLYSIS STANDARD = EEes ENRICHMENT FACTOR = B = ELECTROLYSIS EFFICIENCY OF SAMPLE = EES = POST DISTILLATION MASS OF WEIGHING BULB + SAMPLE MASS OF NEIGHING BULB MASS OF SAMPLE 0900 U9 MASS BEFORE MASS AFTER CONCENTRATION FACTOR= MASS OF SAMPLE MASS OF VIAL + SAMPLE MASS OF VIAL MASS OF SAMPLE OQUQUQ DATA cpm H# Z efficiency count time 6.77 320 BACKGROUND 6+1? cpm count time (background) ,2 GD NET COUNT with 2 sigma error cpm DATA CORRECTED (for LS counter efficiency, electrolysis efficiency, and concentration factor) (net count)/mass of sample _ (Z efficiency)(EES)(C.F.) ACTUAL dpm/g = dpm/B .0071 T.U. 69 COUNTY TOWNSHIP SECTION __ E/E/E STREET ADDRESS DATE Nov. 19, 1980 SAMPLE # Electrolysis std. RUN # 2 ELECTROLYSIS MASS OR VOLUME 15n+ 005 g/ml ELECTROLYSIS EFFICIENCY OF ELECTROLYSIS STANDARD = EEes A6728+AQ§21 ENRICHMENT FACTOR = 8 = 8.6Qfii,]5]Q ELECTROLYSIS EFFICIENCY OF SAMPLE = EES = POST DISTILLATION MASS OF WEIGHING BULB + SAMPLE 97.78::005 8 MASS OF WEIGHING BULB 92.43+.OOS 8 MASS OF SAMPLE 5.35+.Ol g MASS BEFORE CONCENTRATION FACTOR MASS AFTER 29.90+.0568 MASS OF SAMPLE MASS OF VIAL + SAMPLE 20.95::005 g MASS OF VIAL 15.75:.005 g MASS OF SAMPLE 5.2Q:.005 g DATA cpm H# Z efficiency count time 36.68 95.5 .1456:,0100 320 BACKGROUND 6'55 cpm count time (background) 320 NET COUNT with 2 sigma error 30'13i32329 cpm DATA CORRECTED (for LS counter efficiency, electrolysis efficiency, and concentration faccor) (net count)/mass of sample _ (Z efficiency)(EEs)(C.F.) dpm/g ACTUAL dpm/g = .0071 T.U. 7O COUNTY TOWNSHIP SECTION __ E/E/R STREET ADDRESS DATE Nov. 19. 1980 SAMPLE # Blank RUN # 2 ELECTROLYSIS MASS OR VOLUME 162: 005 g/ml ELECTROLYSIS EFFICIENCY OF ELECTROLYSIS STANDARD = EEe S ENRICHMENT FACTOR = 8 = ELECTROLYSIS EFFICIENCY OF SAMPLE = EEs =- POST DISTILLATION MASS OF WEIGHING BULB + SAMPLE MASS OF WEIGHING BULB MASS OF SAMPLE 000000 MASS BEFORE MASS AFTER CONCENTRATION FACTOR= MASS OF SAMPLE MASS OF VIAL + SAMPLE MASS OF VIAL MAS 8 OF SAMPLE 0000 00 DATA cpm H# X efficiency count time 6.55 320 BAC1 g MASS OF SAMPLE 7-41 1101 S MASS BEFORE , 'Y" :3 CONCENTRATION FACTOR MASS AFTER 21_sq :Afl433 MASS OF SAMPLE MASS OF VIAL + SAMPLE 20 28 + 005 g MASS OF VIAL 15,z§ E .99: g MASS OF SAMPLE 5.00 i .005 8 DATA cpm H? X efficiency count time 6.44 400 BACKGROUND cpm count time (background) NET COUNT with 2 sigma error cpm DATA CORRECTED (for LS counter efficiency, electrolysis efficiency, and concentration factor) = (net count)/mass of sample _ (% efficiency)(EEs)(C.F.) ACTUAL dpm/g dpm/g C) O \1 pa T.U. 73 COUNTY TOWNSHIP SECTION___ k/k/k STREET ADDRESS DATE NOV. 10. 1980 SAMPLE # ELECTROLYSIS STD. RUN # 4 ELECTROLYSIS MASS OR VOLUME 160.i. 005 g/ml ELECTROLYSIS EFFICIENCY OF ELECTROLYSIS STANDARD = EE -7144 i -0558 es ENRICHMENT FACTOR = 8 = 9'205 i '1905 ELECTROLYSIS EPPI IENCY OP SAMPLE = EES = POST DISTILLATION MASS OF WEIGHING BULB + SAMPLE 98.33 + .005 g MASS OF WEIGHINC BULB 91.09 + .005 g MASS OF SAMPLE 7.24 + .01 g MASS BEFORE , 1 =3 . + . CONCENTRATION PACTOR MASS AFTER 22 10 0243 MASS OF SAMPLE MASS OF VIAL + SAMPLE 20-90.: -005 g MASS OF VIAL 15 8?.:.-005 B MASS OF SAMPLE 5-08 i .005 g DATA cpm H# Z efficiency count time 29.55 96 .1454 i .0100 320 BACKGROUND 6°52 cpm count time (background) 320 NET COUNT with 2 sigma error 23403 i -1496 cpm DATA CORRECTED (for LS counter efficiency, electrolysis efficiency, and concentration factor) (net count)/mass of sample = (Z efficiency)(EES)(C.F.) dpm/g ACTUAL dpm/g = .0071 *1 Ci 74 COUNTY TOWNSHIP SECTION _ win/1r. STREET ADDRESS DATE Nov. 10, 1980 SAMPLE # BLANK RUN # 4 ELECTROLYSIS MASS OR VOLUME g/ml ELECTROLYSIS EFFICIENCY OF ELECTROLYSIS STANDARD = EEes ENRICHMENT FACTOR = 8 = ELECTROLYSIS EFFICIENCY OF SAMPLE = EES = POST DISTILLATION MASS OF WEIGHING BULB + SAMPLE MASS OF WEIGHING BULB MASS OF SAMPLE 000000 MASS BEFORE MASS AFTER CONCENTRATION FACTOR= MASS OF SAMPLE MASS OF VIAL + 3AMPLE MASS OF VIAL MASS OF SAMPLE 000000 DATA cpm H# Z efficiency count time 6.52 320 BACKGROUND6°52 cpm count time (background) 320 NET COUNT with 2 sigma error 6°52.i '0034 cpm DATA CORRECTED (for LS counter efficiency, electrolysis efficiency, and concentration factor) _ (net count)/mass of Sample _ "' a . ‘ " _ dpm/g ; o (A eLficiency)(EES)(--f-) .0071 ACTUAL dpm/g T.U. 75 COUNTY TOWNSHIP SECTION __ Elk/E STREET ADDRESS DATE NOV. 10, 1980 SAMPLE # ELECTROLYSIS STD. RUN # 6 ELECTROLYSIS MASS 0R VOLUME 99-98 :. 005 g/ml ELECTROLYSIS EFFICIENCY OF ELECTROLYSIS STANDARD = EEes ~6577.: ~1341 ENRICHMENT FACTOR = B = 6-62. :_-1341 ELECTROLYSIS EFFICIENCY OF SAMPLE = EEs = POST DISTILLATION MASS OF WEIGHING BULB + SAMPLE 99.96 + .005 8 MASS OF WEIGHING BULB 89.72 1;.005 g MASS 0F SAMPLE 6.24 + .01 g CONCENTRATION FACTOR= 32:: EEEEEE 16.02 + .0472 MASS OF SAMPLE MASS OF VIAL + SAMPLE 20.84 i .005 g MASS 0F VIAL 15.81_:_.OOS g MASS OF SAMPLE 5.03,:g.005 g DATA cpm H# X efficiency count time 23.60 97.4 .1449 1 .0099 480 BACKGROUND 8'43 cpm count time (background) 480 NET COUNT with 2 sigma error 8'43 cpm DATA CORRECTED (for L5 counter efficiency, electrolysis efficiency, and concentration factor) (net count)/mass of sample _ (% efficiency)(EES)(C.F.) dpm/8 ACTUAL dpm/g = .0071 T.U. 76 COUNTY TOWNSHIP SECTION __ k/‘a/M STREET ADDRESS DATE NOV- 10. 1980 SAMPLE if BLANK RUN # 6 ELECTROLYSIS MASS 0R VOLUME g/ml ELECTROLYSIS EFFICIENCY OF ELECTROLYSIS STANDARD = EEes ENRICHMENT FACTOR = B = ELECTROLYSIS EFFICIENCY OF SAMPLE = EES = POST DISTILLATION MASS OF WEIGHING BULB + SAMPLE MASS OF WEIGHING BULB MASS OF SAMPLE 000000 MASS BEFORE MASS AFTER CONCENTRATION FACTOR= MASS CF SAMPLE MASS OF VIAL + SAMPLE MASS OF VIAL MASS OF SAMPLE 00 0000 DATA cpm H# 2 efficiency count time 8.43 480 BACKGROUND8-43 cpm count time (background) 480 NET COUNT with 2 sigma error cpm DATA CORRECTED (for LS counter efficiency, electrolysis efficiency, and concentration factor) _ (net count)/mass of sample _ ACTUAL dpm/g ’ z efficiency)(EEs)(C.F.) dpm/g .0071 77 COUNTY INGHAM TOWNSHIP MERIDIAN SECTION 2__ Ella/‘4. STREET ADDRESS LAKE LANSING DATE NOV. 18, 1980 MICHIGAN SAMPLE # RUN # 2 ELECTROLYSIS MASS OR VOLUME 160 i.-005 g/ml ELECTROLYSIS EFFICIENCY OF ELECTROLYSIS STANDARD = EEeS ENRICHMENT FACTOR = B = 8-606 1 .1510 ELECTROLYSIS EFFICIENCY OF SAMPLE a BB = .6761 :_.0520 3 POST DISTILLATION MASS OF WEIGHING BULB + SAMPLE 95'23 i '005 g MASS OF WEIGHING BULB 89.72 :_.005 S MASS OF SAMPLE 5.51 :_.01 g , _ MASS BEFORE CONCENTRATION FACTOR- MASS AFTER 29.03 + .0536 MASS OF SAMPLE MASS 0F VIAL + SAMPLE 21.27 + .005 g MASS OF VIAL 15.84 + .005 g MASS OF SAMPLE 5.43 + .005 g DATA cpm H# X efficiency count time 12.88 104 .1429 :;.OO92 320 BACKGROUND 6-55 cpm count time (background) 320 NET COUNT with 2 sigma error 6°33.i ~0903 cpm DATA CORRECTED (for L8 counter efficiency, electrolysis efficiency, and concentration factor) (net count)/mass of sample = (34 efficiency)(EES)(C.F.) 4155 “h ~05“ dpm/g .0071 ACTUAL dpm/ g = 58.54 i 9.27 T.U. 78 COUNTYmGMM TOWNSHIP MERIDIAN SECTION ___ M/M/k STREET ADDRESS POND # 2 DATE NOV. 18, 1980 SAMPLE # RUN # 2 ELECTROLYSIS MASS 0R VOLUME 162.: -005 g/ml ELECTROLYSIS EFFICIENCY OF ELECTROLYSIS STANDARD = EE es ENRICHMENT FACTOR = B = 8.606 ici1510 ELECTROLYSIS EFFICIENCY OF SAMPLE = FEs = .6861 :fi,0500 POST DISTILLATION MASS OF WEIGHING BULB + SAMPLE 98.76 + .005 g MASS OF WEIGHING BULB 92.43 + .005 g MASS OF SAMPLE 6.33 + .01 g MASS BEFORE CONCENTRATION FACTOR= MASS AFTER 25.59 + .0412 MASS OF SAMPLE MASS OF VIAL + SAMPLE 98.76 i .005 g MASS 0F VIAL 92.43 + .005 g MASS 0F SAMPLE 6-33 + -005 S DATA cpm H# X efficiency count time 11.63 100 .1440 :_.OO96 320 BACKGROUND 6'55 cpm count time (background) 320 NET COUNT with 2 sigma error pilgg + -0834 cpm DATA CORRECTED (for LS counter efficiency, electrolysis efficiency, and concentration factor) _ (net count)/mass of sample . v o.- = 7 ACTDAL dpm/o (% efficiency)(EES)(C.F.) .4035 + .0640 dpm/8 {0071 56.83 + 9.01 T.U. 79 COUNTY INGHAM TOWNSHIP MERIDIAN SECTION __ Elk/E STREET ADDRESS POND # 3 DATE NOV. 18, 1980 SAMPLE # RUN # 2 ELECTROLYSIS MASS OR VOLUME 161 + .005 g/ml ELECTROLYSIS EFFICIENCY OF ELECTROLYSIS STANDARD = EEe S ENRICHMENT FACTOR a B = 8.606 i .1510 ELECTROLYSIS EFFICIENCY OF SAMPLE 3 EE = .6628 -_+-_ .0548 s POST DISTILLATION MASS 0F WEIGHING BULB + SAMPLE 94-39.: ~005 g MASS OF WEIGHING BULB 39 22 i Q05 g MASS 0F SAMPLE 4, 67 E 401 g MASS BEFORE 'F m a CONCEN-RATI0N FACIOR MASS AFTER 34,4] i.-0749 MASS OF SAMPLE MASS OF VIAL + SAMPLE 20.37 :.005 8 MASS OF VIAL 15.79 i .005 S MASS OF SAMPLE 4.58 1.005 8 DATA cpm H# Z efficiency count time 11.62 96 .1454 + .0100 320 BACKGROUND 6-55 cpm count time (background) 320 NET COUNT with 2 sigma error 5.07 :_-0834 cpm DATA CORRECTED (for LS counter efficiency, electrolysis efficiency, and concentration factor) . ~ (net count)/mass of sample _ .2901 + .0496 . ACTUAL dpm/g ‘ z efficiency)(EES)(C.F.) 0071 “pm/3 40.86 I 6.99 -.U_ 8O COUNTY INGHAM TOWNSHIPMERIDIAN SECTION __ wit/‘4. STREET ADDRESS poNn # 5 DATE Fun: 18 1989 SAMPLE # RUN # ,2 ELECTROLYSIS MASS OR VOLUME 160-.i -005 g/ml ELECTROLYSIS EFFICIENCY OF ELECTROLYSIS STANDARD = EE GS ENRICHMENT FACTOR = 3 = 8.606 : .1510 ELECTROLYSIS EFFICIENCY OF SAMPLE == EEs = .6771 i .0518 POST DISTILLATION MASS OF WEIGHING BULB + SAMPLE 95.30 + .005 g MASS OF WEIGHING BULB 89.72 + .005 g MASS OF SAMPLE 5.58 1;.01 g MASS BEFORE ‘ . . g 28.67 + .052 CONCENTRATION FACTOR MASS AFTER __ 3 MASS OF SAMPLE MASS 0F VIAL + SAMPLE 21-05 1 ~005 g MASS 0F VIAL 15.66 i .005 g MASS OF SAMPLE 5T39.i.-005 8 DATA cpm H# Z efficiency count time 12.8LI 99. ,144I‘:_I0092 37D BACKGROUND 5,55 cpm count time (background) 320, NET COUNT with 2 sigma error 5,25 f .0899 cpm DATA CORRECTED (for LS counter efficiency, electrolysis efficiency, and concentration factor) _ (net count)/mass of sample ‘ (z efficiency)(EEs)(C.F.) = '4512 + '0726 dpm/g ACTUAL dpm/g __ .0071 63.55 1:10.23 T.U. 81 COUNTY INGHAM TOWNSHIP MERIDIAN SECTION _ lr/‘r/‘r STREET ADDRESS POND 5 DATE NOV- 19. 1980 SAMPLE # RUN # 7- ELECTROLYSIS MASS OR VOLUME 162 i '005 g/ml ELECTROLYSIS EFFICIENCY OF ELECTROLYSIS STANDARD = EE es ENRICHMENT FACTOR = 8 = 8.606 + .0537 ELECTROLYSIS EFFICIENCY OF SAMPLE = EES = .6861 + .0500 POST DISTILLATION MASS OF WEIGHING BULB + SAMPLE 98.76 + .005 g MASS OF WEIGHING BULB T32.43 13005 g MASS 0F SAMPLE 6.33 i .01 g MASS BEFORE . , a 25.59 + .0412 CONCENTRATION FACTOR MASS AFTER _ MASS OF SAMPLE MASS 0F VIAL + SAMPLE 20.73 i .005 g MASS 0F VIAL 15-75 i -005 g MASS OF SAMPLE 3-98 i ~005 8 DATA cpm H# Z efficiency count time 9.97 97 .1451 i .0099 320 BACKGROUND 6'55 cpm count time (background) 320 3.42 i: .059 NET COUNT with 2 sigma error cpm DATA CORRECTED (for LS counter efficiency, electrolysis efficiency, and concentration factor) (net count)/mass of sample _ (Z efficiency)(EEs)(C.F.) .2695 + .0434 dpm/g .0071 ACTUAL dpm/g = 37.96 i 6.11 T.U. 82 COUNTY TOWNSHIP SECTION __ k/%/% STREET ADDRESS Pond 7 DATE Nov. 12,1980 South pond SAMPLE # RUN # 1 ELECTROLYSIS MASS 0R VOLUME 16Q::005 g/ml ELECTROLYSIS EFFICIENCY OF ELECTROLYSIS STANDARD = EEes ENRICHMENT FACTOR = B = 8 833: 1915 ELECTROLYSIS EFFICIENCY OF SAMPLE = EES g .7093: 0556 POST DISTILLATION MASS 0F WEIGHING BULB + SAMPLE 97 4%1'005 g MASS OF NFICHINC BULB 89.7&:.005 8 MASS 0F SAMPLE 7.69: 01 g CONCENTRATION FACTOR= 32:: iggggE 20.81+.0277 MASS 0F SAMPLE MASS OF VIAL + SAMPLE 20.65+.005 g MASS OF VIAL 15.66+.005 g MASS OF SAMPLE 4.99+.005 g DATA cpm H# X efficiency count time 9.63 97 .1451::0099 320 BACKGROUND 5~77 cpm count time (background) 320 NET COUNT with 2 sigma error 2.80:.0368 cpm DATA CORRECTED (for L8 counter efficiency, electrolysis efficiency, and concentration factor) ACTUAL dpm/g 37. = (net count)/mass of sample = .2676+.0432 (Z efficiency)(EEs)(C.F.) —' dpm/g .0071 6%:§.085 T.U. 83 COUNTY INGHAM TOWNSHIP MERIDIAN SECTION __ Elk/1x. STREET ADDRESS RED CEDAR RIVER DATE NOV. 12, 1980 SHORT ST. (BY BRIDGE) SAMPLE # OKEMOS RUN # 3 ELECTROLYSIS MASS OR VOLUME 160 :.-005 g/ml ELECTROLYSIS EFFICIENCY OF ELECTROLYSIS STANDARD = EEes ENRICHMENT FACTOR = B = 7.6085iiilé41 ELECTROLYSIS EFFICIENCY OF SAMPLE = EES = .6797 i .0454 POST DISTILLATION MASS OF WEICHING BULB + SAMPLE 97.28 + .005 8 MASS OF WEIGHING BULB 88.80 + .005 g MASS 0F SAMPLE 8.48 + .01 g MASS BEFORE CONCENTRATION FACTOR- MASS AFTER 18.86 + .0228 MASS OF SAMPLE MASS 0F VIAL + SAMPLE 20.83 :_.005 g MASS OF VIAL 15.80 + .005 g MASS OF SAMPLE 5.03 + .005 g DATA cpm H# Z efficiency count time 9.60 101 .1436 i .0095 320 BACKGROUND 6°44 cpm count time (background) 320 NET COUNT with 2 Sigma error 3‘16.i.°0681 cpm DATA CORRECTED (for LS counter efficiency, electrolysis efficiency, and concentration factor) (net count)/mass of sample = .3413 :_.0535 , . “ dpm/g O H r F (A efIiCIency)(uEs)\C-f-) .0071 ACTUAL dpm/g = 48.07 + 7.54 T.U. 84 COUNTY INGHAM TOWNSHIP MERIDIAN SECTION __ wig/1x. STREET ADDRESS RED CEDAR RIVER DATE NOV. 10, 1980 DAWN AVE. SAMPLE # EAST LANSING, MICHIGAN RUN # :3 ELECTROLYSIS MASS 0R VOLUME 160:: ~005 g/ml ELECTROLYSIS EFFICIENCY OF ELECTROLYSIS STANDARD = EEes ENRICHMENT FACTOR = B = 7-608 :_.1441 ELECTROLYSIS EFFICIENCY OF SAMPLE = 53 a .6744 i .0465 s POST DISTILLATION 100.47 :_.005 MASS OF WEIGHING BULB + SAMPLE g MASS OF WEIGHING BULB 92.48 i .005 g MASS 0F SAMPLE 7.99 + .01 g MASS BEFORE CONCENTRATION FACTOR MASS AFTER 20.02 + .0257 MASS OF SAMPLE . + . P MASS 0F VIAL + SAMPLE 20 92-—, 00’ g MASS OF VIAL 15.82 + .005 g MASS OF SAMPLE 5.10 + .005 g DATA cpm H# Z efficiency count time 10.01 98 .1447;: .0098 320 BACKGROUND 6°44 cpm count time (background) 320 NET COUNT with 2 sigma error 3-57.i ~0704 cpm DATA CORRECTED (for LS counter efficiency, electrolysis efficiency, and concentration factor) ACTUAL dpm/g a (get count)/mass of sample = .3583 i .0568 .0071 A efficiency)(EEs)(C.F.) dpm/g 50.46 :_8.00 T.U. 85 COUNTY INGHAM ' TOWNSHIP MERIDIAN SECTION 3__ Elk/’4. 3375mm; STREET ADDRESS Meridian Municipal DATE Nov 12, 1980 Well # 5 SAMPLE # WS-l RUN # 2 ELECTROLYSIS MASS 0R VOLUME 15%: 005 g/ml ELECTROLYSIS EFFICIENCY OF ELECTROLYSIS STANDARD = EEes ENRICHMENT FACTOR = 8 = 8 50¢; 1510 ELECTROLYSIS EFFICIENCY OF SAMPLE = EES = 5522: 9599 POST DISTILLATI N MASS OF WEIGHING BULB + SAMPLE 97.01:.005 g MASS 0F NEIGHING BULB 92.43:.005 8 MASS 0F SAMPLE 4.58+.01 S CONCENTRATION FACT0R= gig: iggggg 34.71+ 0769 MASS OF SAMPLE MASS OF VIAL + SAMPLE 20.34+.005 g MASS OF VIAL 15.85+.005 g MASS 0F SAMPLE 4.421.005 g DATA cpm H# Z efficiency count time 8.10 92.5 .1469:.0091 320 BACKGROUND 6°55 cpm count time (background) 320 NET COUNT with 2 sigma error 1'55:30651 cpm DATA CORRECTED (for L8 counter efficiency, electrolysis efficiency, and concentration factor) (net count)/mass of sample . -. p. = .0889tufll69 dpm/g (a etri-1ency)(EES)(C.F.) :0071 ACTUAL dpm/g = 12.52:2.38 T.U. 86 COUNTY INGHAM TOWNSHIP MERIDIAN SECTION §__ win/‘4. NE/NE/SE STREET ADDRESS ‘Par Mor DATE N°V° 10’ 1980 2591 E. Mr78 SAMPLE # WS-2 East Lansing RUN # 1 ELECTROLYSIS MASS OR VOLUME 160+ 005 g/ml ELECTROLYSIS EFFICIENCY OF ELECTROLYSIS STANDARD = EE es ENRICHMENT FACTOR = B = 8-83&t-1510 ELECTROLYSIS EFFICIENCY OF SAMPLE = EE -- ~686li-0613 5 POST DISTILLATION MASS 0F WEIGHING BULB + SAMPLE 95-4712005 g MASS OF WEIGHING BULB 39,74+_005 g MASS 0F SAMPLE 5.71;.01 8 MASS BEFORE CONCENTRATION FACIOR- MASS AFTER 27.92:.0496 MASS OF SAMPLE MASS 0F VIAL + SAMPLE 20.77+.005 8 MASS 0F VIAL 15.78:.005 S MASS 0F SAMPLE 4.99+.005 8 DATA cpm # Z efficiency count time 11.71 101.5 .1435+.0095 320 BACKGROUND6-77 cpm count time (background) 320 NET COUNT with 2 sigma error 4341.0036 cpm DATA CORRECTED (for LS counter efficiency, electrolysis efficiency, and concentration factor) (net count)/mass of sample =.3601+.0573 (Z efficiency)(EES)(C.F.) —'0071 ACTUAL dpm/g = dpm/8 50.7218.070 T.U. 87 COUNTY INGHAM TOWNSHIP MERIDIAN SECTIONZQ_ Elk/3r. NW,NE.SE STREET ADDRESS 2588 HASLETT DATE NOV. 12,_1980 EAST LANSING SAMPLE # WS-3 RUN # 3 ELECTROLYSIS MASS 0R VOLUME 159~5.: .005 g/ml ELECTROLYSIS EFFICIENCY OF ELECTROLYSIS STANDARD = EEes ENRICHMENT FACTOR = B = 71502 3111421 ELECTROLYSIS EFFICIENCY OF SAMPLE =3 EES = .6644 i -0485 POST DISTILLATION MASS OF WEIGHING BULB + SAMPLE E MASS OF WEIGHING BULB 91.11 :;4005 8 MASS OF SAMPLE 7.11 :401 8 MASS BEFORE CONCENTRATION FACTOR= MASS AFTER 22.43 i .0323 MASS OF SAMPLE MASS OF VIAL + SAMPLE 20.72 + .005 g MASS OF VIAL 15.69 + .005 g MASS OF SAMPLE 5.03 + .005 g DATA cpm H# Z efficiency count time 11.03 96.5 .1453 t .0100 320 BACKGROUND 6'44 cpm count time (background) 400 NET COUNT with 2 sigma error 4°59 iL-O761 cpm DATA CORRECTED (for L3 counter efficiency, electrolysis efficiency, and concentration factor) _ (net count)/mass of sample _ .3674 + .0591 _ . _ q _ dpm/g (Z erficiency)(EEs)(C.F.) .0071 ACTUAL dpm/g 51,25 i a 32 T.U. 88 COUNTY INGHAM TOWNSHIP MERIDIAN SECTION 8__ ink/13337131733 STREET ADDRESS Meridian Municipal DATE Nov. 13, 1980 Nell # 3 SAMPLE #WS-4 RUN # 2 ELECTROLYSIS MASS OR VOLUME 16119005 g/ml ELECTROLYSIS EFFICIENCY OF ELECTROLYSIS STANDARD = EEes ENRICHMENT FACTOR = 8 = 8.§QQ:.]510 ELECTROLYSIS EFFICIENCY OF SAMPLE = EES = .6814:.0509 POST DISTILLATION MASS OF WEIGHING BULB + SAMPLE 95.65+.005 8 MASS 0F WEIGHING BULB 89.72:.005 8 MASS 0F SAMPLE 5.93+.01 g CONCENTRATION FACTOR= 3:3: :figgiE 27.15+.0466 MASS 0F SAMPLE MASS 0F VIAL + SAMPLE 21.07:.005 g MASS 0F VIAL 16.00:.005 g MASS OF SAMPLE 5.01:,005 g DATA cpm H# Z efficiency count time 9.27 98.75 .1444:.0097 320 BACKGROUND 6'55 cpm count time (background) 320 NET COUNT with 2 sigma error 2'7Z:‘0709 cpm DATA CORRECTED (for L8 counter efficiency, electrolysis efficiency, and concentration factor) (net count)/mass of sample = .2023:}0348 (Z efficiency)(EES)(C.F.) 0071 ACTUAL dpm/g = dpm/g 28.49+4.901 T.U. 89 COUNTY INGHAM TOWNSHIP MERIDIAN SECTION 9__ 1«Pa/‘4. sxflmflsfi STREET ADDRESS 2400 RABY RD. DATErunn 19 1939 _ HASLETTL MICHIGAN SAMPLE # ws-5 RUN # 1 ELECTROLYSIS MASS OR VOLUME 160 :_.005 g/ml ELECTROLYSIS EFFICIENCY OF ELECTROLYSIS STANDARD = EE es ENRICHMENT FACTOR = B = 3-838 :1-1915 ELECTROLYSIS EFFICIENCY OF SAMPLE = EE = ~7007- : ~0573 S POST DISTILLATION MASS OF WEIGHING BULB + SAMPLE 96.57.:. 005 g MASS OF WEIGHING BULB 89.21 + .005 8 MASS OF SAMPLE 6-86 i -01 8 , MASS BEFORE CONCENTRATION rACTOR MASS AFTER 32.32 i .0342 MASS OF SAMPLE MASS OF VIAL + SAMPLE 20.70 i .005 S MASS OF VIAL 15.70 i .005 S MASS OF SAMPLE 5.00;: .005 8 DATA cpm H# Z efficiency count time 11.48 98.25 .1446 t .0098 320 BACKGROUND 6°77 cpm count time (background) 320 NET COUNT with 2 sigma error' 4 71 i -0833 cpm DATA CORRECTED (for L5 counter efficiency, electrolysis efficiency, and concentration factor) ACTUAL dpm/g = (net count)/mass of sample = .3990 i .0680 .0071 (z efficiency)(EEs)(C.F.) dpm/g 56.20 i 9.58 T.U. 9O COUNTY INGHAM TOWNSHIP MERIDIAN SECTION _ 37./Edit. STREET ADDRESS East Lansing DATE Nov. 12. 1980 Municipal well #2 SAMPLE # WS-6 RUN # 1 ELECTROLYSIS MASS OR VOLUME lag: 005 g/ml ELECTROLYSIS EFFICIENCY OF ELECTROLYSIS STANDARD = EE BS ENRICHMENT FACTOR = 5 = 8 838| 1915 ELECTROLYSIS EFFICIENCY OF SAMPLE = EE‘ = .7122 POST DISTILLATION MASS OF WEIGHING BULB + SAMPLE MASS OF WEIGHING BULB MASS OF SAMPLE 00 00 00 MASS BEFORE MASS AFTER CONCENTRATION FACTOR= MASS OF SAMPLE MASS OF VIAL + SAMPLE MASS OF VIAL MASS OF SAMPLE 00 00 0Q DATA cpm # Z efficiency count time 6.15 320 BACKGROUNDE"77 cpm count time (background) 320 NET COUNT with 2 sigma error cpm DATA CORRECTED (for L8 counter efficiency, electrolysis efficiency, and concentration factor) 0 _ (net count)/mass of sample _ 0 ACTUAL dpm/° z efficiency)(EEs)(C.F.) 0071 dpm/g 0 T.U. 91 COUNTY INGHAM TOWNSHIP MERIDIAN STREET ADDRESS TMERIDIAN WELL # S 2090 BURCHAM DR. EAST LANSING, MICHIGAN SECTION g__ E/E/E DATE NOV. 12. 1980 SAMPLE 2"} WS-7 RUN # 2 ELECTROLYSIS MASS 0R VOLUME 159 :_~005 g/ml ELECTROLYSIS EFFICIENCY OF ELECTROLYSIS STANDARD = EE ES ENRICHMENT FACTOR = B = 8-606;: .1510 ELECTROLYSIS EFFICIENCY OF SAMPLE = EE = .6622 i .0549 S POST DISTILLATION MASS OF WEIGHING BULB + SAMPLE 97_01 + .005 g MASS OP WEIGHING BULB 92.43 ¥;.005 8 MASS OF SAMPLE 4.58 E .01 8 MASS BEFORE CONCENTRATION FACTOR MASS AFTER 34.71_: .0769 MASS OF SAMPLE MASS OF VIAL + SAMPLE 20.34 + .005 g MASS 0F VIAL 15.85 + .005 g MASS OF SAMPLE 4.49 + .005 g DATA cpm H# X efficiency count time 8.10 92.5 .1469 i .0091 320 BACKGROUND 6'55 cpm count time (background) 320 NET COUNT with 2 sigma error 1-55,:,-0651 cpm DATA CORRECTED (for LS counter efficiency, electrolysis efficiency, and concentration factor) (net count)/mass of sample = .0889 + .0169 (Z efficiencY)(EES)(C.F.) -' .0071 ACTUAL dpm/g = dpm/g 12152 i 2-38 T.U- 92 COUNTY INGHAM TOWNSHIP MERIDIAN SECTION 32 W‘s/3r. SELSEJNE STREET ADDRESS 4845 MOHICAN DATE NOV. 10, 1980 OKEMOS SAMPLE # ws-8 RUN a? 3 ELECTROLYSIS MASS OR VOLUME 160 i ~005 g/ml ELECTROLYSIS EFFICIENCY OF ELECTROLYSIS STANDARD = EE es ENRICHMENT FACTOR = B = 9-203 + -1006 ELECTROLYSIS EFFICIENCY OF SAMPLE = 538 = 17118,t410539 POST DISTILLATION MASS OF WEIGHING BULB + SAMPLE IQQ°Qé.i.IQQ§ g MASS OF WEIGHING BULB 92.48 1.005 8 MASS OF SAMPLE 7.56 i .01 S MASS BEFORE CONCENTRATION FACTOR- MASS AFTER 2L.16 + /0287 MASS OF SAMPLE MASS OF VIAL + SAMPLE 20.91 + .005 g MASS OF VIAL 15.84 + .005 g MASS OF SAMPLE 5°07,i2-005 3 DATA cpm H# X efficiency count time 11.65 96 .1454 i:.0100 320 BACKGROUND 6°52 cpm count time (background) 320 NET COUNT with 2 sigma error 5-13 11.0834 cpm DATA CORRECTED (for L3 counter efficiency, electrolysis efficiency, and concentration factor) ACTUAL dpm/g = (net count)/mass of sample = ~4582.i .0744 .0071 (Z efficiency)(EES)(C.F.) dpm/g 64.54 3: 10.48 T.U. 93 COUNTY INGHAM TOWNSHIP MERIDIAN SECTION20_ lz/lz/l: STREET ADDRESS 4825 MOHICAN DATE NOV. 10, 1980 OKEMOS SAMPLE # ws-9 RUN # 4 ELECTROLYSIS MASS OR VOLUME 160.:.-005 g/ml ELECTROLYSIS EFFICIENCY OF ELECTROLYSIS STANDARD = EEeS ENRICHMENT FACTOR = B = 9.205 + -1906 ELECTROLYSIS EFFICIENCY OF SAMPLE = EES = .7081 i .0562 POST DISTILLATION MASS OF WEIGHING BULB + SAMPLE 99.20 + .005 8 MASS OF WEIGHING BULB 92.49 + .005 g MASS OF SAMPLE 6.71 + .01 g MASS BEFORE :- . + . CONCENTRATION FACTOR MASS AFTER 23 99 0365 MASS OF SAMPLE MASS OF VIAL + SAMPLE 20.08.:_.005 g MASS OF VIAL 15.76 :;.005 g MASS OF SAMPLE 5.11 :_.005 g DATA cpm H# X efficiency count time 10.52 96.5 .1453 :;.0100 320 BACKGROUND 6'52 cpm count time (background) 320 NET COUNT with 2 sigma error 4-00.:.-0774 cpm DATA CORRECTED (for LS counter efficiency, electrolysis efficiency, and concentration factor) (net count)/mass of sample 2 .3171 i.°0539 W dpm/8 (A efficiency)(EES)(C.F.) .0071 ACTUAL dpm/g = 44.66 + 7.59 T.U. 94 COUNTY INGHAM TOWNSHIP MERIDIAN SECTION 22 wit/la SE,s‘r;.NE STREET ADDRESS 4845 MOHICAN DATE NOV. 12, 1980 OKEMOS SAMPLE # ws_1o RUN # 4 ELECTROLYSIS MASS OR VOLUME 160 1 ~005 g/ml ELECTROLYSIS EFFICIENCY OF ELECTROLYSIS STANDARD = EEes ENRICHMENT FACTOR = 8 = 9-205,&411906 ELECTROLYSIS EFFICIENCY OF SAMPLE = EES = .2123 + 054] POST DISTILLATION MASS OF WEIGHING BULB + SAMPLE 100.04 + .005 g MASS 0F WEIGHING BULB 92.48 + .005 8 MASS OF SAMPLE 7.56 + .01 g MASS BEFORE . T." a L CONCENTRATION .ACTOR MASS AFTER 21.16 + .0287 MASS OF SAMPLE MASS OF VIAL + SAMPLE 20.91 i .005 g MASS OF VIAL 15.84 i;-005 g MASS OF SAMPLE 5.07 i .005 g DATA cpm H# 2 efficiency count time 11.65 96 .1454 i .0100 320 BACKGROUND 6'52 cpm count time (background) 320 NET COUNT with 2 sigma error 5-13 i:-0834 cpm DATA CORRECTED (for LS counter efficiency, electrolysis efficiency, and concentration factor) (net count)/mass of sample = .4582 :_.O687 , - . , dpm/g / I? (A efficiency)(LES)(C.F.) .0071 ACTUAL dpm/g = 64.54 + 9.68 T.U. 95 COUNTY INGHAM TOWNSHIP MERIDIAN SECTION _2_(_)_ k/‘r/‘x. STREET ADDRESS 4751 MOHICAN DATE NOV. 10, 1980 OKEMOS SAMPLE #‘WS-ll RUN # 4 ELECTROLYSIS MASS OR VOLUME 160.:.-005 g/ml ELECTROLYSIS EFFICIENCY OF ELECTROLYSIS STANDARD = EE es ENRICHMENT FACTOR = B = 9,205 i .1905 ELECTROLYSIS EFFICIENCY OF SAMPLE = EES = .5955 i1 Q§9Q POST DISTILLATION MASS OF WEIGHING BULB + SAMPLE 97.05;: .005 S MASS OF WEIGHING BULB 91.32 i .005 8 MASS OF SAMPLE 5.73 + .01 g MASS BEFORE ' T on = CONCENTRA-I-, FACTOR MASS AFTER 27.92 + .0496 MASS OF SAMPLE MASS OF VIAL + SAMPLE 20.58 + .005 g MASS OF VIAL 15.57 + .005 g MASS OF SAMPLE 5.01 + .005 g DATA cpm H# X efficiency count time 10.74 96.25 .1453 i .0100 320 BACKGROUND 6'52 cpm count time (background) 320 NET COUNT with 2 sigma error 4'22.i '0393 cpm DATA CORRECTED (for L8 counter efficiency, electrolysis efficiency, and concentration factor) ACTUAL dpm/o = (net count)/mass of sample = .2981 i .0289 O ' .0071 m efficiency)(EES)(c,F,) dpm/g 41.99 i;4.07 T.U. 96 COUNTY INGHAM TOWNSHIP MERIDIAN SECTION _2_Q_ idle/1x. SELSE.NE STREET ADDRESS 4715 MOHICAN DATE NOV. 12, 1980 OREMOS SAMPLE # WS-12 RUN # 3 ELECTROLYSIS MASS OR VOLUME 161 i ~005 g/ml ELECTROLYSIS EFFICIENCY OF ELECTROLYSIS STANDARD = EE es ENRICHMENT FACTOR = 3 = 7-608 : ~14“ ELECTROLYSIS EFFICIENCY OF SAMPLE 3 BE 3 .6768 i .0464 3 POST DISTILLATION MASS OF WEICHINC BULB + SAMPLE 96-88 i '005 g MASS OF WEIGHING BULB 883] : 111115 g MASS OF SAMPLE 8.07 15.01 8 MASS BEFORE T? ‘ = CONCENTRATION LACTOR MASS AFTER 19.95 i .0253 MASS OF SAMPLE MASS OF VIAL + SAMPLE 20.80 + .005 g MASS OF VIAL 15.80 + .005 g MASS OF SAMPLE 5.00 + .005 3 DATA cpm H# Z efficiency count time 8.83 97.5 .1449 i .0099 320 BACKGROUND 6'44 cpm count time (background) 400 NET COUNT with 2 sigma error 2'39 i .0639 cpm DATA CORRECTED (for LS counter efficiency, electrolysis efficiency, and concentration factor) (net count)/mass of sample = .2443 + .0405 . -- . dpm/8 (A eIIiCIency)(EES)(C.F.) .0071 ACTUAL dpm/g = 39 g] i.5 20 T.U. 97 COUNTY INGHAM TOWNSHIP MERIDIAN SECTION22_ k/‘m/‘x. STREET ADDRESS ARAPAHO & TEKONCHA DATE NOV. 10, 1980 OKEMOS SAMPLE # WS-13 RUN # 4 ELECTROLYSIS MASS OR VOLUME 160 i .005 g/ml ELECTROLYSIS EFFICIENCY OF ELECTROLYSIS STANDARD = EEeS ENRICHMENT FACTOR = 8 = 9.205 .1906 f ELECTROLYSIS EFFICIENCY OF SAMPLE = EES = .7068 i .0565 POST DISTILLATION MASS OF WEIGHING BULB + SAMPLE 97.92 + .005 g MASS OF WEIGHING BULB 91.32 + .005 g MASS OF SAMPLE 6.60 + .01 g MASS BEFORE . L J . 24.3 + .0377 CONCENTRATION FACTOR MASS AFTER 9__ MASS OF SAMPLE MASS OF VIAL + SAMPLE 20-82 i .005 g MASS OF VIAL 15.82;: .005 g MASS OF SAMPLE 5-00 i .005 g DATA cpm H# Z efficiency count time 10.50 95.75 .1455 i .0100 320 BACKGROUND 6'52 cpm count time (background) 320 NET COUNT with 2 sigma error 3-98 i ~0777- cpm DATA CORRECTED (for LS counter efficiency, electrolysis efficiency, and concentration factor) (net count)/mass of sample = .3174 :_.0542 (Z efficiency)(EEs)(C.F.) 0071 ACTUAL dpm/g = dpm/g 44.70 + 7.63 T.U. 98 COUNTY INGHAM TOWNSHIP MERIDIAN SECTION .39_ iz/lz/lx. STREET ADDRESS 4753 ARAPAHO DATE NOV. 10. 1980 OKEMOS SAMPLE # WS-14 RUN # 4 ELECTROLYSIS MASS OR VOLUME 160.: -005 g/ml ELECTROLYSIS EFFICIENCY OF ELECTROLYSIS STANDARD = EEe S ENRICHMENT FACTOR = 8 = 9'205.i-°1906 ELECTROLYSIS EFFICIENCY OF SAMPLE 3 E3 = .6906 :_.O604 S POST DISTILLATION MASS OF WEIGHING BULB + SAMPLE 95.06 + .005 g MASS OF WEIGHING BULB 89.76 + .005 g MASS 0F SAMPLE 5.30 + .01 g MASS BEFORE A L a o + o CONCENTRATION FACTOR MASS AFTER 30 19 0579 MASS 0F SAMPLE MASS OF VIAL + SAMPLE 20-93.:.-005 g MASS 0F VIAL 15.86 i". .005 g MASS OF SAMPLE 5-07 3: ~005 g DATA cpm H# Z efficiency count time 8.98 96-5 -1453 3'. 10100 270 BACKGROUND 6.52 cpm count time (background) qpn NET COUNT with 2 sigma error _ZI46 + -0694 cpm DATA CORRECTED (for L8 counter efficiency, electrolysis efficiency, and concentration factor) (net count)/mass of samgle (z efficiency)(EES)(c,F.) = .1602 + .0300 dpm/g ACTUAL dpm/g = _ .0071 22.56 + 4.23 T.U. 99 COUNTY INGHAM TOWNSHIP MERIDIAN SECTION E Elk/1r. RUN 1'} 2 ELECTROLYSIS MASS OR VOLUME 161 + .005 g/ml ELECTROLYSIS EFFICIENCY OF ELECTROLYSIS STANDARD = EEes ENRICHMENT FACTOR = B = 8.606 1,.1510 ELECTROLYSIS EFFICIENCY OF SAMPLE a BB = .6936 :_.O485 S POST DISTILLATION MASS OF WEIGHINO BULB + SAMPLE 96-63 :.-OO5 3 MASS OF WEIGHING BULB 39-72:i ~005 S MASS OF SAMPLE w531i -01 g x! p CONCENTRATION FACTOR= 7:32 3:211:13 22,79 :11 JRLA MASS OF SAMPLE MASS OF VIAL + SAMPLE 21°05 i '005 g MASS OF VIAL 15.85 i .003 S MASS OF SAMPLE 5.20 :2 .005 8 DATA cpm H# Z efficiency count time 11.62 97.25 .1450 + .0099 320 BACKGROUND 6.55 cpm count time (background) 320 NET COUNT with 2 sigma error 5.07 + .0834 cpm DATA CORRECTED (for LS counzer efficiency, electrolysis efficiency, and concentration factor) , = (net coun:)/mass of sample = 4163 + 0654 ACTLAL dpm/g (% efficiency)(EEs)(C.F.) ' 0071 dpm/g 58.63 i 9.21 T.U. 100 COUNTY INGHAM TOWNSHIP MERIDIAN SECTION E_ M/M/M STREET ADDRESS 4624 SEQUOIA DATE NOV. 12. 1980 OKEMOS SAMPLE # WS-16 RUN # 3 ELECTROLYSIS MASS OR VOLUME 161 5 i.-005 g/ml ELECTROLYSIS EFFICIENCY OF ELECTROLYSIS STANDARD = EEe S ENRICHMENT FACTOR ' 8 = 7.608 i;.1441 ELECTROLYSIS EFFICIENCY OF SAMPLE = EES = .6791 + .0456 POST DISTILLATION MASS OF WEICHING BULB + SAMPLE 98.27 :_.005 g MASS OF WEIGHING BULB 89.77 :_.005 g MASS OF SAMPLE 8.50 :;.01 g MASS BEFORE . g a 19.00 + .022 CONCENTRATION FACTOR MASS AFTER __ 9 MASS OF SAMPLE MASS 0F VIAL + SAMPLE 20.84 i .005 g MASS 0F VIAL 15.77 i .005 g MASS OF SAMPLE Si07 : .005 g DATA cpm H# 2 efficiency count time 8.60 96 .1454 i .0100 320 BACKGROUND6°44 cpm count time (background) 400 NET COUNT with 2 sigma error 2-16 i1-0627 cpm DATA CORRECTED (for LS counter efficiency, electrolysis efficiency, and concentration factor) 4 , _ (net count)/mass of samgle _ .2006 i .0335 ACTUAL dpm’5 % efficiency)(EES)(C.F.) 0071 dpm/g 28.25 :_4.72 T.U. 101 COUNTY INGHAM TOWNSHIP MERIDIAN SECTION 33 l/a/I’C/lf. NE,SE,SE STREET ADDRESS 4584 COMMANCHE DATE NOV. 12, 1980 OKEMOS SAMPLE #'WS-l7 RUN # 3 ELECTROLYSIS MASS OR VOLUME 160.:.+005 g/ml ELECTROLYSIS EFFICIENCY OF ELECTROLYSIS STANDARD = EE es ENRICHMENT FACTOR = B = 7.608 i;.0481 ELECTROLYSIS EFFICIENCY OF SAMPLE = EES = .6661 + .0481 POST DISTILLATICN MASS OF WEIGHING BULB + SAMPLE 99.76 i .005 g MASS OF WEICHINC BULB 92.49 i .005 g MASS OF SAMPLE 7-27 L-01 S MASS BEFORE T = 22.00 + .0309 CONCENTRATION FACTOR MASS AFTER ._ MASS OF SAMPLE MASS 0F VIAL + SAMPLE 20.87 i .005 g MASS OF VIAL 15-85 3: ~00? S MASS OF SAMPLE 5°02 3: 7305 g DATA cpm H# Z efficiency count time 7.48 96.4 .1453 15.0100 400 BACKGROUNDELAA cpm count time (background) gag NET COUNT with 2 sigma error 1104 f _0494 cpm DATA CORRECTED (for LS counter efficiency, electrolysis efficiency, and concentration factor) ACTUAL d r/ = (net °°unt)’lmass °f smile - 0973 + 0186 d m/E L p“ g (2 efficiency)(EEc)(C.F.) ' 0071 p “ 13.70 i 2.62 T.U. 102 COUNTY INGHAM TOWNSHIP MERIDIAN SECTION 33 AElk/‘4. SW.NE.SE STREET ADDRESS 4520 COMMANDER DATE NOV. 12. 1980 OKEMOS SAMPLE 1; WS-18 RUN # 3 ELECTROLYSIS MASS OR VOLUME 160 i .005 g/ml ELECTROLYSIS EFFICIENCY OF ELECTROLYSIS STANDARD = EEes ENRICHMENT FACTOR = B = 7.608 i i1441 ELECTROLYSIS EFFICIENCY OF SAMPLE -- EES = .6192 :t .0578 POST DISTILLATION MASS OF WEIGHING BULB + SAMPLE 92.97 + .005 g MASS OF WEIGHING BULB 88.80 + .005 g MASS OF SAMPLE 4.17 + .01 g MASS BEFORE A F. -3 38. 7 + . 2 CONCENTRATION ACTOR MASS AFTER 3 _k 093 MASS OF SAMPLE MASS OF VIAL + SAMPLE 20.00 i .005 g MASS OF VIAL 15.92 i .005 g MASS 0F SAMPLE 4.08 i: .005 g DATA cpm Hfl Z efficiency count time 8.28 91 .1476 :;.0085 320 BACKGROUND 6'44 cpm count time (background) 320 NET COUNT with 2 sigma error 1'84 i '0610 cpm DATA CORRECTED (for LS counter efficiency, electrolysis efficiency, and concentration factor) (net count)/mass of sample = .1286 i .0241 -. , - dpm/g W F . ( (A e-t1c1ency)(EES)(C.F.) .0071 ACTUAL dpm/ g = 18.11 + 3.39 T.U. 103 COUNTY INGHAM TOWNSHIP MERIDIAN SECTION _2_0_ lr/‘E/lr. sw.sE, SE STREET ADDRESS 2600 COCHISE DATE NOV. 12,51980 OKEMOS SAMPLE # WS-19 RUN # 3 ELECTROLYSIS MASS OR.VOLUME 1601:.-005 g/ml ELECTROLYSIS EFFICIENCY OF ELECTROLYSIS STANDARD = EEes ENRICHMENT FACTOR .. B = z 553 _r 155] ELECTROLYSIS EFFICIENCY OF SAMPLE a EEs = 5559 _i 5585 POST DISTILLATION MASS OF WEICHINC BULB + SAMPLE 99.821:5.005 g MASS OF WEICHINC BULB 92.48 :;.005 8 MASS OF SAMPLE 7.345:_.O1 g CONCENTRATION FACTORa 32:: igiggfi 21.80 + .0304 MASS OF SAMPLE MASS OF VIAL + SAMPLE 20.75 + .005 g MASS 0F VIAL 15.77 i .005 g MASS OF SAMPLE 4.98,:_.005 g DATA cpm H# Z efficiency count time 10.08 97.5 .1449 i .0099 320 BACKGROUND 6'44 cpm count time (background) 320 NET COUNT with 2 sigma error 3°64.i.-0708 cpm DATA CORRECTED (for LS counter efficiency, electrolysis efficiency, and concentration factor) (net count)/mass of sample = .3470 + .0563 (Z efficiency)(EEs)(C.F.) 5671 ACTUAL dpm/g = dpm/8 48.87 i 7.93 T.U. 104 COUNTY INGHAM TOWNSHIP MERIDIAN SECTION 9__ 1Elk/Ar. STREET ADDRESS 2323 RABY RD- DATE NOV. 10.1980 HASLETT SAMPLE # WS-ZO RUN # 6 ELECTROLYSIS MASS OR VOLUME 100.12.: -005 g/ml ELECTROLYSIS EFFICIENCY OF ELECTROLYSIS STANDARD = EEes ENRICHMENT FACTOR = s = 6.520 t .1351 ELECTROLYSIS EFFICIENCY OF SAMPLE = EEs = .6559 i .0493 POST DISTILLATION MASS OF NEICHINC BULB + SAMPLE 94.90 + .005 g MASS 0F WEIGHINC BULB 88.76 + .005 g MASS 0F SAMPLE 6-153:_-01 S CONCENTRATION FACTOR= BASS iggggE 16.31 i .0274 MASS OF SAMPLE MASS 0F VIAL + SAMPLE 20.89 i .005 g MASS op VIAL I584: .005 g MASS OF SAMPLE 5-05 i -005 3 DATA cpm H# Z e'ficiency count time 11.64 97.25 .1450 i .0099 320 BACKGROUND 8'43 cpm count time (background) 480 NET COUNT with 2 sigma error 53,2i_:.10808 cpm DATA CORRECTED (for L8 counter efficiency, electrolysis efficiency, and concentration factor) _ (net count)/mass of sample _ ACTUAL dpm/g ' z efficiency)(EES)(C.F.) .4098 i .0702 dpm/8 .0071 57.72 + 9.89 T.U. 105 COUNTY' INGHAM TOWNSHIP MERIDIAN SECTION 3__ Elk/k STREET ADDRESS 2090 RABY RD. DATE 55y 15 1955 HASLETT SAMPLE # ws-21 RUN # 6 ELECTROLYSIS MASS OR VOLUME 100.03 + .005 g/ml ELECTROLYSIS EFFICIENCY OF ELECTROLYSIS STANDARD = EEes ENRICHMENT FACTOR = .8 = ELECTROLYSIS EFFICIENCY OF SAMPLE = EEs = POST DISTILLATION MASS OF WEICHINC BULB + SAMPLE 97-38 1 ~005 8 MASS OF WEIGHING BULB 9l513 l .006 g MASS 0F SAMPLE 5115 E 101 8 CONCENTRATION mm... :33; 2:33;}: 1, 22 _. 0m MASS OF SAMPLE MASS 0F VIAL + SAMPLE 21'00-1-'005 8 MASS 0F VIAL 15.26 + ,005 S MASS OF SAMPLE §=Qé.i.-QQS 8 DATA cpm H# 2 efficiency count time 6.59 96 .1454 + .0100 320 BACKGROUND 8.43 cpm count time (background) 400 NET COUNT with 2 sigma error cpm DATA CORRECTED (for LS counter efficiency, electrolysis efficiency, and concentration factor) a _ (net count)/mass of sample = ACTUAL dpm/° . (Z efficiency)(EES)(C.F.) 0071 dpm/g 0-0 T.U. 106 COUNTY INGHAM TOWNSHIP MERIDIAN SECTION 31_ IIlls/1: STREET ADDRESS 2305 SWINOL DATE NOV- 10’ 1980 OKEMOS SAMPLE # WS-22 RUN #‘5 ELECTROLYSIS MASS OR VOLUME 100.06 : .005 g/ml ELECTROLYSIS EFFICIENCY OF ELECTROLYSIS STANDARD = EEes ENRICHMENT FACTOR = 8 = ELECTROLYSIS EFFICIENCY OF SAMPLE = EEs = POST DISTILLATION MASS OF WEICHING BULB + SAMPLE 97.58 1;.005 g MASS OF WEICHINC BULB 91-32:: ~005 g MASS OF SAMPLE 5725.i.-01 8 CONCENTRATION FACTOR= 32:: gigggE 15-98.i.-0263 MASS OF SAMPLE MASS OF VIAL + SAMPLE 20°92.i.-005 g MASS OF VIAL 15.90 i -005 g MASS OF SAMPLE 5-02 14005 8 DATA cpm H# Z efficiency count time 6.43 100 .1441 i;.0096 320 BACKGROUND 8.43 cpm count time (background) 490 NET COUNT with 2 sigma error cpm DATA CORRECTED (for LS counter efficiency, electrolysis efficiency, and concentration factor) a (net count)/mass of sample _ (Z efficiency)(EES)(C.F.) ACTUAL dpm/g dpm/g .0071 0-0 T.U. 107 COUNTY INGHAM TOWNSHIP -fl315155 SECTION A AIM/‘4. STREET ADDRESS 4825 ARDMORE DATE N55 15 1955 OKEMOS SAMPLE ir‘ WS-23 RUN # 6 ELECTROLYSIS MASS OR VOLUME 100.01 + .005 g/ml ELECTROLYSIS EFFICIENCY OF ELECTROLYSIS STANDARD = EEe S ENRICHMENT FACTOR = 8 = ELECTROLYSIS EFFICIENCY OF SAMPLE = EES = POST DISTILLATION MASS OF WEIGHINC BULB + SAMPLE 96-87 i -005 8 MASS OF WEIGHING BULB 91.05. + Inns 8 MASS 0F SAMPLE 4-31 1 -01 8 MASS BEFORE CONCENTRATION FACTOR- MASS AFTER 1L 21 : -mns MASS 0F SAMPLE MASS 0F VIAL + SAMPLE 2Q 32 i QQ5 g MASS OF VIAL lilggli' 005 g MASS OF SAMPLE 5.02, E .005 8 DATA cpm H# Z efficiency count time 6.80 96.75 .1452 + .0099 400 BACKGROUND 8.43 cpm count time (background) 400 NET COUNT with 2 sigma error cpm DATA CORRECTED (for LS counter efficiency, electrolysis efficiency, and concentration factor) , o _ (net count)/mass of sample _ ACTUAL dpm/° _ Z efficiency)(EEq)(C.F.) 0071 dpm/g D o 0-0 T.U. 108 COUNTY INGHAM TOWNSHIP MERIDIAN SECTION2_1__ 1EDI/‘1 STREET ADDRESS PILGRIM HOUSE DATE NOV. 10, 1980 OKEMOS SAMPLE # WS-24 RUN # 6 ELECTROLYSIS MASS OR VOLUME 105 55 i 555 g/ml ELECTROLYSIS EFFICIENCY OF ELECTROLYSIS STANDARD = EEes ENRICHMENT FACTOR = S = 6.620 + .1341 ELECTROLYSIS EFFICIENCY OF SAMPLE = 15.13~ = .6403 + .0523 D POST DISTILLATION MASS OF WEIGHING BULB + SAMPLE 96.55 1;.005 g MASS OF WEIGHING BULB 91.32 i;.005 g MASS OF SAMPLE 5.23 i .01 g . = ”ASS BEFORE 19.13 + 1.00 CONCENTRATION FACTOR MASS AFTER ._ MASS OF SAMPLE MASS OF VIAL + SAMPLE 20°79 i '005 8 MASS OF SAMPLE F54” i '0”? 8 DATA cpm H# Z efficiency count time 9.63 96.25 11453 i .0100 320 BACKGROUND 8.43 cpm count time (background) 490 NET COUNT with 2 sigma error 1.20 i .0735 cpm DATA CORRECTED (for LS counter efficiency, electrolysis efficiency, and concentration factor) (net count)/mass of sample = (z efficiency)(EEs)(C.F.) '1335 + '0287 dpm/g .0071 ACTUAL dpm/g = 18.80 i 4.04 T.U. 109 COUNTY INGHAM TOWNSHIPMERIDIAN SECTION _2_0_ IIlla/Ir. STREET ADDRESS 4444 HACADORN DATE NOV. 18, 1980 OKEMOS SAMPLE # WS-25 RUN # 6 ELECTROLYSIS MASS OR VOLUME 100.03 T .005 g/ml ELECTROLYSIS EFFICIENCY OF ELECTROLYSIS STANDARD = EE es ENRICHMENT FACTOR = 8 -- 6.620 2‘. ~1341 ELECTROLYSIS EFFICIENCY OF SAMPLE = EES = POST DISTILLATION MASS OF WEIGHING BULB + SAMPLE 92 DZ 1 QQ5 g MASS OF WEIGHING BULB 91 32 :1 555 g MASS OF SAMPLE 6‘35.i.-01 8 .. _ MASS BEFORE DONCENTRATION FACTOR- MASS AFTER 15,25 : .QZSQ MASS OF SAMPLE MASS OF VIAL + SAMPLE 97.67 + .005 S MASS OF VIAL 91.67 i .005 8 MASS OF SAMPLE 6.35 + .005 3 DATA cpm H# Z efficiency count time 7.84 96.4 .1453 :_.0100 400 BACKGROUND 8-43 cpm count time (background) 400 NET COUNT with 2 sigma error cpm DATA CORRECTED (for LS counter efficiency, electrolysis efficiency, and concentration factor) (net count)/mass of sample _ Z efficiency)(EES)(C.F.) ACTUAL dpm/g = dpm/g .0071 0-0 T.U. 110 COUNTY' INGHAM TOWNSHIP MERIDIAN SECTION'gg_ AXE/k STREET ADDRESS 4564 HERRON DATE NOV. 18, 1980 OKEMOS SAMPLE # WS-26 RUN # 6 ELECTROLYSIS MASS OR VOLUME 100-06.i.-005 g/ml ELECTROLYSIS EFFICIENCY OF ELECTROLYSIS STANDARD = EEe S ENRICHMENT FACTOR . e = 6.620 t .1341 ELECTROLYSIS EFFICIENCY OF SAMPLE = EEs = .6633 i;,0480 POST DISTILLATION MASS OF WEIGHING BULB + SAMPLE 95.37 + .005 g .MASS OF WEIGHING BULB 88.76 + .005 g MASS OF SAMPLE 6.61 + .01 g MASS BEFORE 'T‘ a CONCENTRATION FACTOR MASS AFTER 15.14 + .0237 MASS OF SAMPLE MASS OF VIAL + SAMPLE . 20.83 1;.005 g MASS OF VIAL 15.77 + .005 g MASS OF SAMPLE 5.06 + .005 g DATA cpm H# Z efficiency count time 8.89 96.4 .1453 :_.0100 320 BACKGROUND 8°43 cpm count time (background) 400 NET COUNT with 2 sigma error ~460.i.-0697 cpm DATA CORRECTED (for L8 counter efficiency, electrolysis efficiency, and concentration factor) (net count)/mass of sample = (% efficiency)(EEs)(C.F.) - dpm/g ACTUAL dpm/g = Cfl+ 071 7.63 + 2.25 T.U. 111 COUNTY INGHAM TOWNSHIP MERIDIAN SECTION _2_0_ 1APE/‘4. STREET ADDRESS 1511 RIVER TERRACE DATE NOV 1;; 1955 . OKEMOS SAMPLE # WS-27 RUN # 6 ELECTROLYSIS MASS 0R VOLUME 100.05 + .005 g/ml ELECTROLYSIS EFFICIENCY OF ELECTROLYSIS STANDARD = EEe S ENRICHMENT FACTOR = 8 = 6.62 i .1341 ELECTROLYSIS EFFICIENCY OF SAMPLE — EEa = 5825 :1: 5592 .3 POST DISTILLATION MASS OF WEIGHING BULB + SAMPLE 595590 + L005 3 MASS OF WEICHING BULB 89.72 I .005 8 MASS 0F SAMPLE 6-18 :L.01 8 , MASS BEFORE CONCENTRATION FACTOR MASS AFTER M MASS OF SAMPLE MASS 0F VIAL + SAMPLE 20.84 i .005 8 MASS OF VIAL 15.73 1;.005 8 MASS OF SAMPLE 5.11 i .005 8 DATA cpm H# Z efficiency count time 7.48 96 .1454 + .01 400 BACKGROUND 8.43 cpm count time (background) 400 NET COUNT with 2 sigma error cpm DATA CORRECTED (for LS counter efficiency, electrolysis efficiency, and concentration factor) (net count)/mass of sample 0 0 I Q = = o ACTLAL dpm/° Z efficiency)(EES)(C.F.) 0071 dpm/g 0L0 T.U. APPENDIX E WELL LOGS 112 f. . I . ./ ‘ 331:; ‘- 0 ‘37: Ivanmmm COMPANY J '4‘: INDIANAPOLIS a MISHAWAKA o LANSING TEST ) . PERMANENT Job No. Q7317 2" mu. LOG No.__$____-c1TY Ehs‘r stwo Coumy_ Noam-1 Owner EAST LAUS‘UC - MER‘DIAM UJATLK 3 StwLQ Auwhckifi'fowmhip M'Q|Dlfi~ Section—:3- ,_; -‘N _._RgnJ— Location Stale N1 \C H‘GA'J From Land Doe criplion DPW. YKQD , SF. 74 SW74 HE’I. SEC. 8 (tom Sixeelor Bond 655'. 5- 0‘ Q. MERR‘T RD. I ‘93 W- OF C P ARK LA<¢ QC. 9 ' FROM NATURAL Gamma LEVEL FORMATION romp — nascm: run! 9.3;? 33:"; “fir’ 3:... um— um- unn- Ian! I ho Lac. Tamed O 7.5 ZS ! SAuo AND CLAY 25 7.8 3 SAM: AND GRAUEL. '28 45 . l7 (DRAUELLV Chh'f 4s 75 30 GRIN“. _ CLA‘! Auo Rocks '75 ® I4 SNAL-C‘. 89 95 9 ;" sAoJDsTodé ‘ 98 HS 10 ) SAuoz-roue. was swam: 0F LIHE5YOHE \13 I33 \5 SAuoz-rooc . 133, ‘43 '0 4v“... SAubs-‘ropc wnu $141.95 or 3243th SAuos-touz, I43 ‘53 I0 1520er SAQDSNNE - HARD \53 ISB S 5AMDS'TOML wn‘u STRIPS or Baa...) Salons-roar. . I58 \53 S I imam: smoswwe ' lb} ma 5 I SAUbs'Tode you?» STRIP at: SHALC. ”.8 I73 5 SAuosvoug . 173 II 5 4S Baum...) SAUbS‘m-la warn S1117 at Lmesmue US 223 S SAuba-raue . 223 143 20 3» SHALL Anon sAuos-roue 2.43 7.5.3 to ‘.\ 2 I Cable Tool Rotary letting :' .. _l§__ " Dia. Hole Drilled by ___X.__ Reverse Circulation Bucket Auger _ . ‘_ - -)) ‘3'. .3." -- "Casing From _- 48 " :bove ground to ‘ 7 I“ S It belowgmmd '- , “I“ . ,. ___ {'Screen SetFton: ‘ ' go I: 9”“,qu . r," I: gs: £5 49%;" 23 :J L’ ' -- --. v. 'Im~'-~- Pumping Tesi - I . {0.92 CPM a! - ....- SEE—2.... 'stpin': level After 113 I @927? N0}? mm” COMPANY horn-ted {3 TEST 2 ‘.-" PERMANENT WELL LOG No '5 _cmr—EQET LMJ'S'MG Owner Eb'J Lonswo - Mgcuomu NATLR ~‘I 5:...)ch Autuogni Location D P (Q ‘1’ R Pu) INDIANAPOLIS . MIsHAwAKA . LANSING Job No. 1.37.971 County "JG‘MH Township MERIDIMJ sedimQ_T<\l . R1“! 51an MICN'GMJ - se'la sw'Ia NE ‘4 §_€-.c.. 8 From Land Description ham 5"“. or Hgad 664' S. 0: ¢_ MERRVIT Rt), I 103' W. 0‘ L PAM: Laue Qo, non 311170.351. GROUND mm Ponm'non FOUND — Duane: my ”.33;- mg “kg- 3:: lane- s»... eu-n m ! SAMDS'TOUE ' 253 2.56 S $AuDsTodE Am: Sum: 2513 2.68 10 ‘ I I SAUDSTOUE 268 278 ID SAUDSTO-JE Ago SHAKE 2.78 183 S SHALE 283 288 S $HALC. Sou-11:: SAuoe-roue 288 293 S '3 SAuDswo-Je $01-46 SHALG 293 198 S Snuosmue Auo SHALL 298 303 S SHALE Son-«E. SA-abswoue 303 308 S ' SHALe 308 318 \o SHAL! Auo SAuosraué 318 313 S SHALe -ver:.~{ L1TTLe 'SAoosvoue 32.3 31.5 S A SHALE «no Sfluosroue 326' 338 10 h Stu—11: rho-JG. 338 368 30 \Ieev thg §Auoswoue 368 3‘73 5 1 Smoosnme {MI-m $11119 c1: L1H£$T01JC 3'73 3'76 5 . Snuos-raue 3"8_ 403 7.5 r4437" Saxons-rout I SOME. SHALt 403 413 '0 Cable Tool Eaton letting ._._._.. " Dia. Hole Drilled by __ Reverse Circulation Bucket Auger .“ Casing Front ” «have ground to I 1!. #1011133?de ‘.":— "Screen Set From lg .' f ' 1LT"; ._°' Slot . it: r’11:.:-. ; .°:‘.l ___.-. -_--.._._'..-. - u " ... -.-.._‘._i_.-__V-[1_' Mpinq level Attet __TK .- ~ 2.0 L :-'P .3 nuts s-d ‘. \J :5 114 — I’Aoe .3 or 3 1 I (@ Naflfflfflfl/ COMPANY T W . 3 INDIANAPOLIS e MISHAWAKA e LANSING Cl TEST . XI PERMANENT . Job No. .9319“ WELL 1.00 No 5 CITY 505* LM’SNG (3.3.1.11, ; Inseam OwnerisféLL-O”$‘”C" Mennomu winch. €Séwifz AUTHMITY Towrwhipgflgslnlhd ' Sedinn a. T4N:R1w _ Location Stats M \CH‘ GAR! From Land Description From Street or Band 6594' 5- 0" Q MERRIT RD. DPLJ YARD . SE74 sw'é ue'fl. sac. s i 103' w. oF 4:. PARK LAKE 20. fltOM NATURAL GROUND mm. romnnon FOUND — nascent mu ”3‘31." 3.13:: "“1? "' {1'32 Ito‘- Ilretu. It... level 413 43'}. 7.0 A») TONE mm '1' L€ 0F SHALC Sum: 433 443 Is Nore’. 'Tms WELL HAS Beau ELEC?RIC.-LO letting Auger Cable Tool ___ Rotary Reverse Circulation Bucket _ " Dio. Hole Drilled by It. below ground " "'.‘nsiflq From __ -" 0'03"“ 95'3“"! t° to, _"______11. Type 5191 " Screen Set From . .--:»1n.:'-_'.~.I ___—___.,_.__.:“.“',‘. «11---. -.-....___.1'. Pumuinq I'M: N39? ' 3’9““ 1 IK —. ' '- ‘ O )IIIonce And Direchon Item Rood In1eteectione 3 OWNER OF WELL. w .. wu RN .LI; P1" or '64:" 53" . Of intersectio'l of '2’er:1.:‘[3—-‘-—°——j " I ___--- -.._ OCOLOOICAL SURVEY SAMPLE No. I 2] ‘ n I I LOCATION OF we LL I 115 TITLED 1% WATER WELL RECORD MICHIGAN osnautur ACT 29: A 1955 or / _. r PuaLIC HEALTH J1. ’LAZSL [County Twp. etien Section No. S Town Henge I- .. Eifi 1511:! "/5 RI: EN. ringrzd 11 73 :1: golf course) ’54:! e we" I. C117 ol Well Location 9591 7'). I273; H L lerzsir': 2591‘" :1 .273 Aldo at o . '" East Inning, 1.5.clugan I? FORMATION YNICINE SS 01' STRATUM 331131-23: I IELL DEPTH (“”1"ch o... .1 Completion stnntuu 15: f, 73/ 9"3 1‘38 ”—\ 5U Cable tool BROIOfy U Driven D 009 53 152 ’ D Hollow ted D Jetted D Bored D _ - l, 6 USE . C] Domestic D Publac Supply 0 Industry 35 D Inigetien D Air Conditiening a Cmerziel D Tent 'ell 7 552”“ 11......EI 11.1.1.4 DIHmAn Annie—DZ _Lin. te l'Ith. Depth :eutleee 1 It. Iweight.____lbI/It. in. o. ___J_1. 0.311. 10.... 51...? r..SN.CI B SCREEN: 3107,: .——._- _._—’-._. _ __—--——.—-—— type- 03- - Slot’GaL-re ___—Lear“- __lt. end_______11. Set between Fillinge: 9 STATIC urea LEVEL 4;“. beIOu- lend Iu'Ioce l0 PUMPING LEVEL below land euvIoce It. e‘ter bra. ,-.,' 1") .pJn. _._“. e‘ter Inn. pumping—44.01. 1] WATER QUALITY in Parts Per Million 3:33;. IIONIFeL______C|1|o1Hn(CII Hetdnee 12 «LL HEAO COuPLETION. 0.1.. A'yeved P11 8 Pitleu Adapter D I?" Above Cred: l3 CROUTING: we3! Greutei? [3 Yet 0 No Hoteriel: D Neel Cement D Depth; From h. 111-.11. )4 SANITARY: learnt Sauce el ”nible enter-fleetin- _£1.'Dtm _EZLOInummp Well dieinteetei upon completion E3 Yee D No 15 PUMP: amt-gm». Nae-“eb‘ .“n 7‘5- uedot Huber—4W"? Length e! Drop Pipe—he_h. eepeelt,_&2.6.'.fl. Type: Subnerelbie U --‘1 i6 Rev-Inks. elevation. eeotce el date. etc. '\ ) ' - ' 3.13.139. "Sh nu. J" D “MEL—_._ 17 HATER wCLL CONTRACYOR s CERTIFICATION- " ~ Th1. well. wee filtled under a, luielletten end his report to me. to he beet elm fine-ledge end belie‘: _ .. -‘ J 4401,00er ecee; threw. -Ir ‘sEOLocICAL SURVEY SAMPLE No. WATER WELL RECORD 1 LOCATION or IIELL I A! ACT 294 116 PA I965 [I] [EDIT lvl‘TIZIEIFT‘I‘] ', A HICHIGAII DEPARTHENT - ,, or 1. weuc HEAL‘I’H . _ Cwflly \W .21-1 1:“!le {Lu-[2:1 “1% t F colon 'l’II l‘ec lien Ne. Reno; ‘1 J] .4... 92% Jéllt‘;’nd :Eecho: "73* Reofi In! Iee lion OWNER No..— M’O/‘Mé’ «if 9.. O O Bowu‘zorfiiuzg E are. Addreee 1575' 7 our-I 70 4 WELL OE PTH; ceapleled) el CenIpleoien 2 l l NW , ISneev can" 8 Clly b! In." Loceiion #. l FORMATION 1.3.31”: 55 or S‘rlnuu .OYYOM OF SYIATUM //.00 "- 4% I4 0 A; ,J "14444 OAAAIAZQ 8 8 5 UCeble Ma: ' Retery Driven Dug B Hello-I red 0 Jewel D Bend D _— A—n‘J jIQWI—Lp 5.1 420 6 USE: Mannie D Publi: Supply 0 Indeeny D lnipeolen D Air Cen‘flenin. D CeeIeIeoeiel D Tee! Well 0 /0/ -.. ’24) £32 4YJI W- 10:2 3W% / 11112111111 \./ 1L? _-_-e- I60 '71/ 7 375m“ TIIm «Jamaal? HelpM:_A__.beve/Belev 4h. 01: l/fih. Depth llu'k‘L—T‘fi: 'el’ll __in. 9e __Jt. Dull! Drive Shoe? Ye NOD ‘ BSCREEN: 1”.- 'A/gA/E- m.. .--——— Slel/Gwle—/ LORI”! ,- r h. an! (__- ll. SO! 50"... Fittinpe: / W1. 9 51 'r C’WAYER LEVEL - lo. bele-I lend ewlece 10 warms LEVEL bOlO‘I lend mm. A.“ . - ‘0 elvec_.'_'lwe. ”pine—___...pw. “ I Me. , _ C ’.e‘e ___h. diet-d ll WATER QUALITY in Pet" Pee Million: —' In" (Fox—.__' Chloride: 5: IL Hoodoo-ed 12 IIELL HEAD coupLE'rIcIII: C] I. An...“ Pi! j 9m... Adm» C] 12" Aim, and. I_ e. - .—- I——.-._ 13 momma: II." amour.» E Yee Cl H. I ’ Mendel: D Nee! CeIeeM UM M Depth: Fro—___” U. V . 14 5mm“. . Nee'eev Sewee el peeelble edited en , lee! Queen-hag,” Uell Jlelnleeiedfiern cenlpleflen AYee U _[Lefi 15 ”3': -' Mmrm' e N”%_- Lenplb el Deep ”ngth eepeel 1,.» E sea-um. DJ” M \ _. {I I $11 ‘ Ie-eibe, eleeeflen. eeuee el deb. en E. L? :3? as? ' MM" 17 urn Tble well wee Mlle! eneev .7 Medle'len and hle oepee' le Ivee 9e he beet el .y bne-lelpe one bellel - IELL CONTRACT DR’S CEITIFICATIQ‘: l eve-em 'J‘.‘ .(DOIICVYAY|VU “I14.3f.3’~4.:1) ‘ ' . '7 '.Cllftl'". DUCCVIm m‘ "...“.nh'* “ . “1.1-"- “2.3 . A ‘ 7 . v I . a .47.?! ”I. I ’ >.~’." 117 PAGE \or 2% \- . . - “I ‘ :2") JAM-01373 Noni/mm coMPA/vr ‘ -. ‘1. 155-1- |NDIANAPous . MISHAWAKA . LANSING . - )j X PERMANENT Job No. L529!“ wan. LOG No__§__cnv__'=2~_sv Lawsuit; CemyJucuAH owner Ems? Lfih-KING ~mammm~l wage. i Scwcn Auwomn Tamed? Manama Section—3;: 4'4 L RAN \b " Casing Pm: _L" above wound to. __ " Sana Set Fm_____.._b 59" CPM at Pumping Test Locmion Scat. MmHIGAvJ me Land DescxiplionMflH HtLL; 55"? NWV4 SE VL56c. 8 fzom Street or Read 83' W- 0‘ ¢- PAW-___" 'C “burr: 52. i nounnmncnomm I POIMATION mono - man: my ' ’39.;- m: hug- :23 um- um— um CLA‘I . ° 8 ' 8 50:? C561 8 l3 5 , GRAVELLY CLAY I3 38. zS’ ; Guava“ Cuw wsYH Rocks 38 so 2.; . i GRAVELLY gum! ‘ Smut - £0 @ 3 , ° : Sn»: . 53 73 IS ' ) SHAL.‘ quH song Sflubsfiue '78 83 5 L $HAL€ t Sudbswug -' _ 83 89 G SA'JDS‘TOOJE B9 98 9 SAHDS'IDDJE i 5m»: 98 lo} 5 Sumo $10.45 {03 ‘09 6 g \_ HhRD 3AHD$WUE \09 H3 4. :1 SA~Ds-rone H3 ‘33 2.0 '5' Q 5 Hana Snapshot: ’33 I45 \5 _E' E g SHALE f Shflbsmni ”3 \55 '5 3: g7 SAUDSWONE ‘53 7‘3 55 3’ ”k Spawn-one wu-ru ance 0: Sun»: 208 1‘3 S Swabs-rune " 2:: 22.3 |5 _.:,85c>_ _._Cohle Tool Romy ‘ ‘ ' m... 1,12,; ,7 _\___S N on; Hole Drillodby _ “X Benn. Circulation W _.5'9" It. Pumping lml A1:«_'__2._Ot55 O 118 ‘ $2.)"- .-‘..... . INDIANAPOLIS o MISHAWAKA o LANSING é UTEST .7 E PERMANENT ' ' , Job no, L3L‘55I ' - wzu. LOG No__.3__.ClTY_EhS'L Lansmo gem, Iggy-mi ,- ) Owner EAi'r LAMSIDJG - MERIDIA'J wATEK ‘ Stuck A“’“-Township Mgannhs ' / Sodom Location ' , Stat. Mmmonu From Land Description Buttons-4 “my: $874 NWV4 58.4 sec. 8 how Sltoot or Rood—81V! '3’ A I’m LAKE RD. 1 7'4. 5- 0' ‘t- “M‘unr RD. non NATURAL GROUND um: romrnou roam: _ oascm: roux .- ”2‘31? 33:: hug- :2; m um. am... 3...: 5m.) STovaE. wfifl 'STIuP or; SHALe - 226 133 5 A.» no. ‘ .233 243 Is one,“ wfifl \P or Song: 146 2.53 S SAUDsTovJE 7.53 2‘73 2:: SHALE 273 7.75 5 SHALE SANDSTBME 175 183 SHALE 283 3‘5 HALE wu‘ru 5 3‘8 2.3 ) nu ' 323 5mm u: SHALC 403 SH be urn» 406 Cable Tool ._ Rotary ___,1' citing " Din. Hole Drilled by ___... Rover" Chculctim __ Bockol Auger __ " Casing From ___" above ground to _ 1!. below groom! ' . . \ .3 _..3c....s..,-.... . ..__;WW Pilaf“? Tu! ' -. 91mg, a. Pumping lmIAfla+b¢o , . . Date Completed ' 2 ‘V ' “m8 _ ' 119 GIOLocICALSURVEHMPLENO-l - - 5 I LLIII II_II_I I I ILI ILI I I HAYER WILL RECORD mcmc‘w oeral‘ruem ACT ”I 'A I’OS of 1 LOCATION or we LL i '0'“: nun” Cow», Twp. Frocflon Socflon No. Tm Ron” s. ‘ Ingham M Ii szSE Ii 9 ‘1 N46. I 3N. Juno And iooc'ion Iron Rood Imoroocflono OWNER N 3 O'NER or 'ELL: 119 East of Parklako Rd. ' Loren Jones 150' North 0! 8d. zhoo Baby m. ,/ Woo-zuoo mb’ Rd. . ASHooO oddvool I City 0' lo" Loco" - Hiflh‘ 2 fogu‘fgm Y:;:°:£::S .EEEERE' ‘ 'ELiLaoszH: “Nth” io/Oijgoén'Ionon 5 D C:5I’o tool 9 Rolovy D Dn’von U 0;: . c lay no “O D Hello-v vod D JoNod D Bond D __> 6 USEQ 0000!“: D Pablo: ‘0',” D Induur' L_Gmnlm¥ 35 25 D Inigofion 0 AI! Condiinoaing D Common-oi i D To" No" D _.....‘:.',': Irjragol 20 11%) SE?“ run-4.4 CI mu“ 01km"; Abovo/Bolo- m o 1&0'. Do 9h oovIo¢o_1___Iv. . .iha 10 15 1 1° . . E'oiohhlLJbo/h. .—In. Do —l!. Do II! Drivo Shoo? Yo; INoD white Band 300! 30 1'50 '8 same» 4 | . T . “an. ion I Grey shale to 180 ".6 0 Slot/ ..... l -9». . Grey sand Book 5 185 5.. s... h -4 1.. Finingo: ' : 9 sunc urea LEVEL : m h. Dolor Ind owloco I 10 PUflPING LEVEL “Io-v load vaoco I ) Ohm ,‘ 4.9.1». I ‘ __1'25. 33.2912": ‘ ll urea OUALH’Y I. hm I'» mum: Icon (Fo)—__ Chlofldoo (CI) Not Boquu-od L— I Hod:- I 12 o: LL new COMPLETION: U I. Appovod Pi! I j Pfllooo Adozgg 0 I1" Abovo Grodo I 13 momma: ; o." GIMMPP Yoo D N. Hot-vial; D Nod Cocoon! 9W 0".“3 F'”4’o H". 14 umunv; Noorooo sootoo oI poulblo ooh-Inouon jO LI... “mum—Septmam Ioll diolnlouod MI You O No Is WH'; Wot'o ”no—@111 MI uuum '19.} Looflh oI Dvoo Hug—h. ooooolImO—G. '.H 'I'yoo: fl Sohorolblo U D L." gm”...— 6 Io-oo‘h. anus... ooovoo .I a... m. 17 um IELL cou'rnctoo's cutIncnIou. _ 'Aootn Into. It mun. a“ 3 :ML'SIKI. 311?.131'3'33‘13‘“ .- d '.". W h m ,1: . ' . _ km W‘ an. In“ R I . . .n 1 m "I - _ . j. : “F9133“!!! yogoloodrfit ,' $ .‘ ‘ -, 9',“ 1 Woo oo. - . . . . u . ‘4 ‘ .. ‘ a 0070 Ion- o-oo ,-. f , 120 ‘- "ST INDIANAPOLIS . MISHAWAKA . LANSING 3 ELRMANENT Job No. $332917 . ‘ Am LOG No. 1 (2er EM? Lmzwe ceumy INCN‘AM " A E.» _,.. gut..- M' "I .4.) LUA‘Io‘I. Am) Scum AuYHdlor - . I» AanLr .. _._. L» D 1 Tom? MJMC‘AM Sodion 9_ F7" \1 - 2 tw motion ' . J"./“_/’"/ 57‘) State MIcLucau From Lead Description 5“! COQQER ct? TCEATHCMT Pym.“ Sl‘?¢_ - $WV§.5WV44§WV§ 55Q9 f Prom Street or Boad_L200':J:- O‘ RABY Q0. a Mod 3: E. or PAM: LAtu, Ru. —— . .- . u L non NAnnIAL caom mu. ronMA'nON romeo —- pm my 1:33- 3:23 “kg- 3:: III-vu- loan Ion- “... . .I. A‘! O S S 5.". ‘VELL‘!’ CLAY 5 . 63) 67 _ ALz 7?. 7S - ALE l «3.7:. r: o: Snuoseooe '15 80 ~- «LE , use-v LWTLE SAuoswode . so 85 I Snub you: 85 H3 .33 33' )) l .' 2v! 3 Ep-M'J SAuDs'roAIE I15 I35 IS 3‘ erbsTacE. I33 I96 GS '-.-».osw~t..:z acumeo Lynn SHALE I98 203 S ’.fiAJDsToué '203 333 I00 I Mb'.‘:u‘a{ i SHALE S'II'AIPS 3 . 302) 307 4' SHALE 307 3'3 G ; Err‘LE L. .-. A $TRIPS or SAubs-roue 3'3 343 30 a.\ ' SAubotcuL -I?H SHALe STAIPS 343 348 5 g “x i SA»D$‘.’0~‘£ UC-H LITWLE SHALI ' 348 353 S I A\ I ‘iAUDs-raua I 3'53 .373 20 ’ Vgi ‘_ SAuosmui L \T'ILE. SHALE ‘ . ' 3‘13 318 S 5 7:“ Swan“ 37: 33¢. a Cable Tool Rotary Jottlng _I_5__. " Din. Hole Drilled by ___.X__ Revoroo‘Circulotim ___—Bucket Aogot D) __‘2_ ~ cash-4 From ___-‘3" .-..,u uhmqr’md res...— »..".‘_ . . {thfiéétmd ___- Screon'Sot From . . . to‘ ' :>;:L:1,3;7? ‘{ £18: 333‘ ' Pumpin‘: Test __ __ ”GIL? ‘51--.. _.. CPM a: _---'..9..3.. I. LII. Punkfinq love! Alto: LKWt ~ .‘do- q .Ttv...v '. ‘.1'~ 121 PAfit 2 o: 7, (O NORTHERN COMPANY . I W iNDIANAPOLIS o MISHAWAKA o LANSING I: TEST .- 27: PERMANENT . - Job No. $291, ' w.-:;L LOG No.___Z_.___ch EAST Lauswc @9eg mar,” —""— Owner EI~..- Adz-n)6' I‘nCQIOIAN) WAfiefl BUD SEUJCR 'A””"“"‘7JT0wnship Mfic'§|fio~) --—-— Section 9;.7403 Q I) Location ' Stat» V‘n c W ’.‘I‘u .- fxom Land Déscription 3-‘N- Condom or TREqTr-AEUT Puma Sri+5v174 5w'/+ sw'a't 1x5; From Strootor Bond ‘ZOO': 3. OF 902‘! 20. é Moo't E. nr VA“: LA!& 20. FROM NATURAL GROUND ma. FORMATION POUND - w my . ”1?: a“ 35:: m It“ IIIC'I- hov— Iovol 3 2 C, 32 8 2. 322 93 S 393 3 9 8 5 399 413 T IS WELL. ‘ I . Cable Tool. ' Rotary mung I ‘> .15— " Dio. Hole Drilled by X Rovotse Circulation Bucket Amp: 1 I I ' 'u . ' - d 3 --y:'-- " CQSI’KI i‘mh __ij " cbovo ground to NJ ‘94 kl}. below mougd "-1.2!" ' " .. J.‘ ’2’." . O“, ' '7 ‘ 3.1/fi’m_”i: :{f 7:13;"!!! ,f FE : _._... " Sateen Se' Flam—___...to- - " {"19 ~_ — \. 0 '.‘O Z (“95] g. \c’\ {9. Pumnin‘! :fV-‘QI AQI‘?‘ ’.”—.24 h“, o c — ----- - .. .. ... , '0 122 lg (. MG?- ~40. 1 of 3 IVORTHHIW COMPANY INCOI'OIAIEO [1 TEST 7 INDIANAPOLIS . MISHAWAKA . LANSING E] PERMANENT Job No. 5-31925 WELL LOG No 11‘ CITY ”m 3"";3'": Counly ‘Iz'f'1::* Owner C77” ‘2' ”V" '-'-""”I”"‘ Townshi‘x “#7119:an Sodium 17;”‘IL 121-'7 Locmim 5mm "Icz'Inm; Fxom Land Description An!" h . .0. ..‘ . ,' ‘,‘ From Street or Read 2 ' ‘- ’l'r‘w' "-- “12.» 3‘ FORMATION FOUND — DESCRIBE FULLY {frfpfin’ "I CT «I, ' "‘/ 63'.“er C‘:u~.<‘.sI:<.~1'ne, sore shale 13” 33" .5319:th QI'ALF 152 CobIo ‘lool Rota J W Hole 1 5 "Dio DrIlIod by: { 'y ° "'9 Rovono Circ. BuckoI Auger Rotary Holo Ground: Nod. f' . “‘ DrIIIIng Mug! OIIIor {colon—.15..”OD From ___—2.1... 'ono ground Io 10:! MI bolov ground. WoIgM ' . Pounds pot IooI. wwun_ ‘3an Saffron _ " Io I.“ ~ , EMBED _ In). 5.0!. Pumping IosI __jfl— 6PM drowdown Io ._ _._731: Ioo'IoII'or.____?_“._ lion pumphg I v m an n~ 'H 5" A Oar I-r- 123 ' ,43 { T‘N‘J’ 77'). 2 of 3 [HURT/153A! COMPANY INCORPOIAIEO D TEST .7 INDIANAPOLIS o MISHAWAKA o LANSING E] PERMANENT Job Nab-31925 WELL LOG No_.l_l__c1TY 3w":- Ln-trzrrr: Com! T._,C.,,.._. Owner 5‘7“" n“ ”3;" T!"GT"r‘. Townfiip ‘7"?Tn‘rm' Spdim 17. "'I‘FL I'll"! Loccfion Slam T’IC’ITCA‘! From Land DescripIion "nan ~. -- . -- From Streelor RoacL 'ULCNWP “AH/n FORMATION FOUND — DESCRIBE FULLY Lirestone "“aFQ & sawfistone strinnv A \ nanvcton R :vactrrn fno’qtrné. trace of fififllc Qanflstone "hale, hard "531» hard & linaztono - Lirectnnc Coblo Tool __ RoIory Hole __"Dlo Drilled by: Rovoru Ciro. ._ Duck» 4 DrillingMud loIory HoIo Ground: NooI Como»! - . JoIIIng Auger Olhor Coolng ”00 From _____'.”obovo ground Io “ -7: [tot biolov‘ grouneroIgH _' _ \ Found! pot fool Scroon " So! Irom Io IooI I .Moh . ' ‘Iypo SIoI ‘ I Pumping IosI _. ' 6PM drowdown Io ___—L. M oIIor ____.__. hrs pumping 7.-. " ,'.o-,' h."‘ . 124 ’1" ( PAGENO-30f3 "' Nani/mm comm/w INDIANAPOLIS e MISHAWAKA e LANSING (3 TEST 5:] PERMANENT 7 u, No,L-31925 WELL Loc; No__11_____chY__LASI_LALi&1LLG Canny—Imam.— OWM, CITY OF EAST LANSING “mag? MERIDIAN SectionWlH... Location SIM. MICHIGAN From Land Description From Street or Band 2090 Burcham Driv§ FORMATION FOUND — DESCRIBE FULLY rqd let-d “do!!! ”In Limestone CobIe Tool __ Roiory __ Jeiting Reverse Ciro. __ Iucket __ Auger OIIIer Hole—__"Dio Drilled by: { Rotory Hole Grouted: Neot C ““ , DrIIIing Mud—___ “Cosing _ ’00 From ___—'.”obove ground to “ ”'Ieet below ground. Weigh Pounds perIod Screen “_ "5mm - Io , t... ' m;_'__'_'_ Iype___:_'_’_. Sid ' brie-m Pumping test ___—___ 6PM drawdovn to ___— Ieet oIter . ..P...IJ..I hquIn' ‘~-L- --_ - ‘.‘JLUI ICAL Stmvu SAMPLE No I e 8 . ’ SWAMP- JUL 2 5' WAIEII WELL escono 125 MICHIGAN DEPARTMEN? [TM—DENT] [ILLILLLJ AC7 2.6 PAI IV LOCA‘I’ION or mu 1 PUBLIC HEALTH Yuwnshto Name Fmruon Sectoon NM You“: NumI-m langu- Nun-Ina \I Ingh m. _L Magggan , 6,3515; TAN M le u. - I . . .. «I am H Iron: Ro— w Intersect-ens OWNER or WELL: . . Nilson & N1130n €845 hghlfani Oktmzsr ”1 tumui 4451 S. Okemos Rd. at #9 nd an a co , . d. . I’. ~' Writ ion JIIIIM — ‘ - Okemos. MI 48964 ' "‘ ' """"I' - .- “-- - SIZIch—I’A-TD: .-. -- 4 WELL DtPiH _ICORIDIUII'I'I I). .1. "I (‘ nu. I -.I. u . ‘ 155 II._.__. __ .___ ' f b D Cab“: tool g Quincy D Urn-m [:1 III." I f D Hjo_l_low rod D Jollod D Bow-l L] "“.'.“.J """ A _ J- > '1" 6 USE: .Oomeeltc D '00“: 5099" D IMuslu - . . T I t 1 Dungenon D An Cone-nonmg D Conn-nu." 7-..:— .T “-l-- t ‘ DieeIWell D I l ! I L _L 7335:361 rmudeij WeldeoD [He-gm: Acevedo-I.— L———: M ‘.l ——vl |Suate¢e ; II. "Ice-Eu 00w YO - v FORMATION Of 007"»: 0' _In. to m". Doom IWnghI the. II. srnnuu stenuu In. to It. Down 10mm Shot" us No C] I—_——-_—_—- BSCREEN: '." "> r _ BIL'ULQAU -_ - " 20 "be: One.. SIoI’Geure Length . - " 30 I ”LICK. __L_H Gui ' Set beiwuen II. and It. . 1 innings: ; ' .. O . qufiluajwd . 40 _4 I ‘ 9 srArIc tum LEVEL . » .__.I‘I.D III FED I :4“ 50 ' __m It. below tend emrece _1 , i to PUMPING LEVEL below lend eurIece ; I '— II I l U . . . ).-.£ ate; -50.nd_ \— 65 fl. II‘OI___NIO DWI“. g D m ' . r. ’ __' H 33¢-..Ei-I” \‘J 70 ' II. etIer_ rue. ammo i o.o.m 3 ,. V It 1mm QUALIrv m rum to. mm”; ROCIS _ [5) ) h" ‘J 155 ' Iron IFeI CMoudee IcII {cuteness Olhor _- .. — - 12 «LL HEAD courLErIom CI u, ”9,0,“ m I D Putese Aceoler m 12" Above Grade j 13 We" Grouteoxg Vee D No I U Neat Cement D lentomte ' Death. From II. to It. : I‘ Nearest Seem: oI ooeetbte comemmenon 1, ~— ~ Iuel Dorectuon Tun I wen one-Meet“ won cmtetoen D Yes Duo ‘5 'W‘ D Not momma Menutecturer' I Name MCOC: Length or Oreo ”9040—". ceoecurv_3n.G.P .u. 1mg: Subunnrote DJ" [3 lecherocmmg no! A 2-0 SOIII' I! It‘ll. Mudet Number m vaml: 230 ____-_ “___—g ; ‘3 Remarks. etevaon. source oI dere. etc. i mow mm In MILLER mu IL > . 'mmcuu av \5 -l. 'feoumun er ' HEVAIIIIII mm» to em 1933‘: ~ ~-‘ . .- . . L- “1‘ “MM [N- u. IL“) 17 WAYER WELL CONTRACTOR'S CERTIFICATION; flue well wee drilled under any lurieeictron one In. noon to tree Io Ike beer 0! my knowledge end belieI. uersrzeeoeus‘mess IAII I 126 «.EI'ILnlzngL SEIHV’EVJSAMPLE No. “ mmD[ [J “[1 ]l i I j Invoice #1741 s/Ilssu—Lé WATER WELL RECORD ACT 29‘ PA I965 MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT [I LOCATION OF wELL [ PuaLIc HEALTH """* ‘ [0*"""" N ""3 "NW0" Serum Number Town NW‘Z‘al lones- New-be: e e '- . ‘ .. _I_ngh_a_m Merzdlan III~I-"-.I'./ r44; 20 4“ NS. Rl‘I-l HIV. in .I n . LnI-I Duo: I- -L.II nun RIIId Inlolsecllons 3 OWNEII OE HELL‘ 'Robert Hill “a...” 4825 I’Ioheaken Indian Lakes 5. ..... . MW, 5 C” ., I. M. Low,” OkemosLMichigan Okemos. chhlgan . I-‘~ m": ‘7‘: -' 8* UM “How Skexch Moo: 4 WELL DEPTH: (commend) Dale 0! Con-clonal: F T ~.- ‘ I i I 1 ' L 1 150 II. Jung 2". 1973 I. - .: - -;_. -:_ -- 5% Cable Iool D Ronny D Onven U Duo , I l I HoIlow cod 0 Jemd D Bond 0 l C a 4 _— " - '1- — 4" - -:- - ‘ T ‘ 5 USE: Dams“: B Public Suoolv D Induslry I I I I Dluioeflon D Air Concilionlng U ComrcIeI I- — — —- — -— -— — -4 MI. 1 T : . DYesI well D I I 1 1 7 CASING: Threadefi WeldedD [H.Ighfl Above/Below s DI”. Lo— I u'l.r. SurIece It. tmcxntss on" 10 ~ 11 2 FORMATION or "no“ 0' Am. Io EL“. DeoIh [WC-9M IstII. stenuu snnuu in. lo h. Deolh 12m. Shoe? Yes No D a sanEfibNE I ' SBHd & gravel 10’ ‘l'm: DIe.: ' Slol/Geuze ___—— Length I I later Sand 10 20 Sel belwecn II. and II. fittings: Hard Fan 20 ' 25 ' 9 sunc wnElI LEVEL I. §§nd 8» Egav 81 25 ' 770) 12 . II. below lend ourleco IO PUMPING LEVEL below land szece ) Rndk 70 ' 150 ' _]_2_ ". ohm—hrs. 90min. JD— 9.9.m. II. alter Ms. amino __ o-an. H IIIAIEII QUALITY III Penn n: Million: Icon IFeI __ Chlovidos ICII Hardness Olhev 12 WELI. HEAD CWLEIIOII: U ,, ”mm. m Pines. ‘Adeotev E] 12" Above Grade ‘3 WOI/GI‘OUIOC7EV“ D No 0 Nut Cement Dlomorme C] Death: Eton-I II. Io II. N NeereeI Souvce oI possible conIemineII'oo bet OIrecIion fwe Ion eIsInIecIod noon complain» ves D No '5 'M D Not III-mm ”Mum's Nani-MW Intel um HP _]_ Vom 21fl__ Leann 00 Drop PIoeALII. ”Mauls—6&3. type: Snow-usable .Iel D IocIovoceImg In: A an: out» I w unto 16 Remarks. elcvolion. smwce oI data. el;. I7 WATER WELL CONTRAC IOR‘S CERYIFICATION: ; .. _ . . . ~. ., z" . This we" Ins dulled under my uniodicflon end IIIIs reoovI Is rue ‘ ' ' ° ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ I. II» has! oI my knowledge as Deli". ) pail»; Wu. -W M? J ‘5‘». .“ ll: 'WItia \A;E ‘I -' ON '53 . g Agavfimh .-n e- - ' Bic-'1 --e .o -e... I ~'.' , r a-Jv.“ ._ ~ . . . c ‘ «- n "M ‘ . 3...- \i J. a. — . _ - .. .- I .. ., . - -—---— - -—.. _ :n-HW Jnl’..- .‘m. — -. .. J —.-:-""e;. -:b..-: u!) ‘..\' -Q "Q Q. 127 ,3.“ ”7'73? ' mmDITIIJI HI I H S/N4R76-2 Invoica mm: ““15" ”Wilfifggo'w/ wcmcm 069mm I LocAIION 0F WELL 1 PUBLIC HEALTH / 7 umlv - ' ‘ Yunnan-a Nam haul Sacnon Mambo: Town umI to»! Nod-H Ingham .. _ Heridian all II/// 20 TdN N. 5. III E 'w. 15”.».- I- Am: ()Iv-n Ir-II hum fiend lfllmsuchons OhNER 0; WELL: . Nelson & Nelson ; Lot #85 4785 Hohican Lana Indian Lakaa “W“ 301 MAC Blvd. ! ....... .. I m ..m. I. Loc...¢..0kamoa, Michign East Lansing, Mlchigan 4882.1 "" "' ‘-"';' "' -' ' "'.“ i'.‘ ‘7': Show: h Mm: 4 WELL O§PTH. Iceman-mu D II..- M Can.” I. m ' J I . , '-. -,, I l I 1_5_5 "‘ 4-9-76 . . .. i E ‘ : - - 5 C} Coblu luol ; Rulavv D Duvm- O l' uI ' l l ; D Higmh 'ud ‘Jcllcd D Mon-d D - , _E ' 'J ’ J ‘ ' ' 4 ' 6 U5" Dorm-am; D flunlvc Suppl [3 “flu-AIL"- I l V I - '1' _ I. . _L -.4 I Ullnuullon D An Continuum-cg D cwIUI‘IIIJ. ; . 1. : ‘ Dunn Wall D _._,._,_ _7 1 I I _L 782:!0: Yhoamw wanna Hon-gm Aamm”” La—luv‘n A “_ _ . ' 'SM'H-Jll—1 ".1 VNICOI:CSS o"'” '0 Ll". In 11". Dun". 'l' Hahn L! IORMAHON none» 0! | . “locum: snnuu ___m. lo. __ II. DL-mh Dnv- -: 5n. ..- ? Vu- "fill; ‘ " ' ' " z ascauu. 1 _Clay_ .. - ..- / 4. Vvlw' Oua.‘ I é S'ol’Glulr ___—___ Lenglh ' Eats: SDHd .L film)- in. Sm m-stcn __ II. and _lu, ; . r‘ 4 humus | . ..flarcLJ’jn 612 .10 . I Ssnmc warm LEVEL ; ,-_ham.em,L_1nn_5nnn 5 35' m .. ”Iowuwwloc- _, ,, 1’ [A 0 WING LEVEL bolo- land unloc- Lflater Sand Am!- "4"” 60: __ " "m _M- www.311— 0 on Rock ,- _ f':) 155' ——-—— "- ""'——"‘"9W"‘9__. u.I-_."_--_. . . H IVA!" OUALIH m an" N All-luau: non Ilel Gillan“! ICll ___—_— l-lmdness __Olhav .- ._ 4.. " 12 van uuo common: D H, mm m _ - ”___ Pullcu Adam" D ‘2" MM Glad. ___! ‘3 Well avowed?“ Von D No D Nut CamanI DIQMaaIIa D - ‘ “E ___. Drum. Fvom ll. Io lI ‘4 Nearesl Some. 0! aosubla communal-on - - - _ mm Duacuoa t..- wall aiamlactad Loon chIHM m'” Duo 7 .. ' 15 PM: D Mac “can“ ' wnwwtwOI's um Mike—54.11%“ nodal Inflow Kw VolIs 230—____ - LOW“ 00 BIO ”fian— 'l cumulvlLGJJI. 'V” Em "‘°""’""' Moadlaas Tank IIClO'OCMIng I .---....-- I ' -- an a Mo an" I! not. In.t311°d ‘-22-76 16 MRS. alevmaon. source of data. ate. 1‘) WATER WELL CONTRACTOR'S CER'HFICA‘I’ION; "Ila wall was dull“ war my iuiadicu‘on and ma ml is In. k la "la ml at my hmwlaaoa and halal. I 3 ' _ cu I ,L ”up, _ s _ o.‘ _J/ " loom wonmmlfl. .' . A a: .5 I; 3.: ‘ ‘ , ' I 1.. I; .. menu -_ "Mum I ' - NI Heml- wa ’“‘ 1am "alumina ' 128 r—“m [BEECH H I II I H I I I 950 . WATER WELL RECORD mcmcgu DEPARTMENT ACT 294 FA I965 OF IT Locnuou or we LL 1 ' mu: "nu" JCwMy _ Twp. Fraction Saelian Na. Town Ran” )_ LL "Inan Eiaridian S»! 532.15 I: IE I; 20 Thin/s. 31}: EN. éalans: Au Dincnan hon Bard lnlavucnons 3 OWNER OF WELL; _ - ' Hope 3. Eradorn ..ds. on 'J 312131 of rfijcnbicin‘w La. “an“ 296 59.91253“: '3'00'0140II‘ 3 C50, 0' Well Localian ’13:: ?'.;1 #Vq:ln:q..la- 8%: 2.851? mg, ”18211333 ' "It-mus om" 7° 4 IIELL DEPTH~( I I d) o I It: I - ‘ l M .campaa aaa amp-nan g 2 FORM‘T'ON' . sua'ruu .fr'II'3703' 150 II. 819/68 , . 5 a Cabla Dual 0 Ronny D Ooivan [j Dug 3 and 3‘ ch] 43 13 D Miller cod D Jallad 0 Band D _ ‘ 6 USE: B Demonic [J Public Supply 0 ladualry 333d ' 41 hé D Inlgalion D Alt Coniflanin. D Conunarcial Cl Tau II.“ D clay 6 52 7 832"“ 7|"th E IIIIJIII Cl IIIIaII: “mm _Lin. la “_ll. Daplll ”awlachi—ll. 33:11 3: clay I 59 rum—__ILI/II. -- ‘ __Iln. la __h. m 10'6” Shoo? YQIBNOD clay 3 62 8 sanENIHong k Typr D8. o i I 88 1 Slol/Gaula lane». 5 Sal bal-aan—ll. and—___Jl. Fininga: 9 sunc WATER LEVEL 19 ll. bala- lndfigrlaca ) . 10 PUMPING LEVEL III.- I.“ IIIIIIII h. allot—_.lva. , ,' , an :4... __ll. all" ll". r -.- '7 r.v - 11 nun QUALITY III PIIII 9.. Mine»: unknown Iron (Fol—___Chlaridaa (Cll Hardnaa \— 12 VE LL HEAD COMPLETION: C] III A...“ P" firm." Adam: D I!" Ab”. Grad. l3 oaourmc: Wall Ground? 3 You O No Malalial: [:1 Neal Canon! D Daub: Frau—JO. Io._h. ll “mum: Nam" Sauc- al paulblo «Mauls-lion .2004.» wit-alum. ‘all dial-Joel“ upon :anglalian Q You O Na 15 PUMP- Mmhcw' a Rename: now Nab-WM? Langlll a! Drop P‘”-hz_h' cape", .PA. Typo: Suharaibla D Jo! D Raclymjfl 17 "In IIIELI. courucmn-s CERTIFDCATION- “Ila wall ”a drilled and“ my innadicllan and “I“ can." ls Mn N Illa baa! a. In, Ina-ladga and Eallal. ‘fl“"" '.. ' I nauvrw-u v1" « .11“ I I - 881(- M ’ WV- V r.v A aunauua unau- nun-1 » . Inca-annea- at. l6 Ramada, alaullaa. awe. of Java. ale. '.ta. . 0" . v: ,- a ..IOII'nfl’Ii:x ~Jvnf§".1a'l' . -—-—~3p’-q 129 ;/L9P77-7 . - nv. I 2073 “ WATS} 112/ELL ‘R'EhCORD MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT )) .CCAI .I-zIIx 0F \‘ELL I Pumc HEALIII ‘ 4 J. l’ "M“h'” ~ "'3’ -" 9‘ "0" Sw'taun Numb" [own NIMI llm a ”We Ingham Heridizm r ' , r; . ." 20 TM! , 3’ ' ______ _._‘fl- ....._ _/ '- 1» ., 'I .' ‘4 94.5. E/w ; .1?“ w .» ’Dll"\l' t I I u" “\‘t: In; ";\.Cl|\""~- 715 Hohican Dr., Corner dohican & chuoia, Indian Lks. Est.. Okemos J0 .‘INER OF WE". L. John Zauaod, Cawood Realty Co. ‘“§fib Kendale Blvd. - ~ .2 I‘ ., .33 ILFIL LIP-13:" Litafin . East LanSinQa "5. 48823 x "‘ ~'-‘= “1‘" "£""--‘ SkaJI Mom. 4 'I'ELL DEPTH. (emitted) Date 00 Comm-moo . I . 155. u. 9-22—77 L. _ .E _ _:_ _:_ _ 5 D Cable tool 8 Rotatv 0 Driven D Dog I I I ‘ D Hollow vod 0 Janet! D Cored U I‘ p- - — — — -l- .— d t . . ‘1 '.L I T G USE-flOmatIc B Public Sunolv D Induatny L_ _1|_ 1 l D“ Dlmoauon D AI: Conditioning D Cmrciat .. , T : 3 D'leat Well D 1 : L 1 782-2105 Tm-adedm WatdedD Height: Above/Below I e L.— I Utgt _.lv Isudx. l '.- tmcuuus DEP'III to . 3 FO-R JATION or ”"9“ or A—m. to 7L“. Depth "Imam Alba/h. stanuu stuwu In. Io tt. Death [Dviva Shoe’ Yea Elna I l ,. 8 SCREEN: . sand 5' .______.-._- -__---- . Type: 00.. Clay ,'~, 'V 25 . Slot/Gout __ Lentil" ed _ __ Sat between It. and H. .. C , . ‘ nardpan ,1 _- 63' FItlmgs. .. 9 sum: WATER LEVEL Gravel 8. Hater Sand ‘. ‘, 73' - 20 '1. below land auv'aca ' 155 . t0 PUMPING LEVEL baton land aulaca ' ' OCK It. atIoI __nca. mine than. H. altar—Na. amino 50 0.9.0». 11 «Min OUALItv In Pam Pa: Mollion: non (Fe! __ CMovIdes ICI) { Hardness Othev tfwnL new COMPLEIIou: U M AWN m Pitteaa Adamo: E] ‘2" Above Grade ‘3 mu Gvoute628 n: D No D Neat Cannot Ulemomte D Depth: horn tt. to lt. N Nearest Source ot ooaaiola contamination toot __Oirection Me Well disintectad won ovulation I?» D No '5 "’3": 0 Not Installed .-u. d...- V .——— --.- ~.—-.. 35:35. elevation. sauce of data. etc In; a and nag! l' Ilznlo mtactwet‘a Nan-a umptnr Modal '4me HPLVOIIIZJQ Length ot Ocoo Noam". canoe-Iv 50.61.“. Two: 8 SumvaIbte D .m D mam-Ian. --w 7 I'IATER WELL carzmcma' s CERIIFICATION: ‘ . - ~‘ - g ' ~ ‘ ' This ”Nae-es. culled on“ m bun-“Inn". IN! [MI W is he" . ., ., I'm . , ,~ ' . ~ ~uII'II IIaaI‘ of” III-mm. and bah-v“. JPcl-ggcm' "913 ‘E' eo.ze.‘2 ‘. a I 139W «1:11.303. (33.9.: m'ua Lit—3.1.; 4.4.3::— 130 5.: "(1' ..AL sug._lgy 54mm: N». _ l I H i DI I l ] ]EDUD - a: g 31974 [3 I WATER WELL RECORD MICHIGAN ogrpmasnr PA! 6 . , s IOCATION or WELL I ”we ”EAL?” -. .-.-, ”Mum." Mum Fuctton Sactnon Mm: Tcran Numb-n Range um: ) frag-am _Fffl-Ei-En _ '.. v. I. 29‘ TLN N/S. ply EM. 3:. ; - And. 6:17. II“. . I: "‘1 Clo—.06 lnl- us—Jchons 3 0*NE“ 0" “ELL: gamer, Bldr on Aracaho ( corner Tekonsha Dr) C :5 'ns » Indian Lakes, Okemos “"“‘ Tekonsha & kamo(m) 3..” u uguu- is t. C I. v‘ v.’-:II LOC'UO" Ok *" 3771.7. 35"?” w 1.0.. ha... Skelgh Map: 4 WELL DEPTH; IcomoIatadI Om ot lechofl T f 3 g . 11.0 .,. 8-16-72 ' - .’ _. —I_ _;- __J 5 D Cable tool m Rotary D Onvan D On [- . , I X D Hollow cod D Jattad D Iona U ' I ' 6 usezflbmstic 0 Public 509on D Industry Dmigatuon D My ConditIonano D Communal ,-..:__--_l___. _ : I T 7/A’0D’5W‘ A 117A PAXo I L - -1--1"---: - ‘ ““- | l ' DY." We" [1 . I 1 1 _L 7CA$|NG= 'nuuaodfl WaldadD Imam: Abovnllm .L——— 1 Ant! 1 a.“ :sudlc. ; 1!. b FORMATION "“5?!” 31:22: h—"‘- ‘° 75—“ °'°"' I"‘°'“ —H-“'""'" f sunuu "anon __in. to _ It. Depth 10'6" Shoo? nag No D L 8 SCREEN: L Sand& .Graval 7% m Tvoo- __sna___" 060.: Ir ’ Slot/Gaul. Lanotn ;____ Sat batwoen It. and ' It. I fittings: I L ROCK 67 ' 11.51 9 snmc mum LEVEL 90 It. halo» Iand amIaca IO PUMPING LEVEL In!” Iand awlaca It. aIIat Iva . mine a '.DJII. It. amn— an. amino ___ man. 11 WATER ouAutv m Pm: Po: Min-on: Icon IFOI Chlorédfl ICII Hatdneu Othat 12 men HEAD cowunouz D m A...“ m B rum: Adamo: E] 12" A50» G'D‘O ‘3 Wall around? a um D No D Naat Ccrnant Uhntonita 0 anth; horn It. to It. N Noavut Sowca oI poaaibln contamination loot DItaction Tyna In" cIaInIactad non canal-tion an: DIM 15 rum: 0 Not Inst-ma ManoIactutav' a Nana W Mono: ~m_53&8_ mem _239_ . Lang": 0' Own PIna_h2_It. caucnv ___GJJA. Tm: D Saba-nib“ D J01 D humans. an a In) an!" I' «can WEOSJE. elevation. source of data. etc. 17 WATER WELL CONTRACTOR S CERTIFICATION: . "Pr“ ""0 8‘ “Wu?! "i .4 :13 .T:i‘;::I.I‘:::zitmm.n;;u&ah¢:unn and um no." on Its. ..J. - -.-1 61 - ; -‘ ' -'-=°-m- . ........-._ ‘ :am we wil» ‘ -. - I ‘ \ /L". . - .' ‘ l c J! //:“/ ll’./::/ '4: iji’! : I Car ‘5’:’:J’3’1Z/ ! ---- ‘— "tn25"':"7fi-r"'z-' 1‘: / '____':CATIDN o= ‘_c_'-ELL I o7 Twp. at)“; it. .. -— —A——._—....-.- .v- WATER WE ACT 29d —._L_..1_.-- --m--- .-—..— _._-.— 131 PA 1965 _5... Function Ll. RECORD 3“ L [I L""1“"*T L_l._lL _J l_..' L_I__J_I MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTN ‘ LB I: fit: «la-0.. o— Socfion No. Town Ronac I 5 Sn." :1.’_::l N’s. —. 212-: Efd. .r_ {EV-:nce A1. J‘Duachon ltom Roo/ Int-noulons ‘ I’ ‘- t- on) C: 1.an .'.'.o ’i :3. :.0o 4.1;” Ru. ("1 IOL' ‘.‘l “‘3'. A‘ n. a- v9.1.3.0 U. 7'1, "rut odd-on 8 City M 1'01! Loeoviom‘lvi-J 1,-..“ j". i ' v I' 1....- 11‘ 1H1” 'H"! T‘~- @wzzll IQ; .-..'1 Ia:- .325 .341)? A. . *ns 3 OWNER OF hELL: 9.3;. 1.3193219}. - Add'oaa , . , Oar-3:33, zucn 3'83 1 FORMATION "r THICKII! 35 Or STRATUM DE?!» 10 IOTTOM C' $TRATUV 4 WELL DEPTH. (con-plow“ o... .s Cnflm." 4L3") It. 1;!)th :12: v 5 9 Cool: too? D Roto'y Dnvon 0009 D Hollow vod U JoIIotl 0 Bond 0 _— ..n.) _.Wr r ?S Domulic 6 USE-.g B Public Supply D Induony Inigotéon D Ail Condltioning Comorciol ‘-“)-?‘ O V'— .v D To" Woll D 7 0.1mm 'nmqu] mmD 1mm... Aha/Km DICM. _Bllt. Oopth |awloco It. Lin. Io 'UoI’hL__J5o/II. I _._—In. to __II. 011k [Otivo Shoo, YoIBNoD none 8 SCREEN: Typo- .-—...-.__.—.-—-ov --_-—-——— —-—.—— Slot ’Gouu So! bola. I1. and Fittingo: 9 sun: urea LEVEL 12' It. bolow lond auvlou IO PUMPING LEVEL Solon- Iond swloco It". pumping___33_...p.m. It. olm ___—,0. ohor J ._- - ' Ins. , ' ‘ r ' ll WATER QUALITY in P0": Pot MiIIuon' 1:115:21?) lvon (Fol____.___CItlorldoa (Cl) ___. “T—_.1 .-- 12 WELL HEAD COMPLETlON: D In Applet"! PH fl mu... Adam. C] 12" at... Grod: 13 cnou'rmo; 9 Yo: D No 'r Noll Gloulod? Mototiol: D NooI Comont D DOpOl't: FtouI—JI. Ooh—_._". 14 SANITARY: Nooroot Sowoo oI poaolblo oonIoInInotIon _ég—Itfl fi—DINCIIMW—Typo 'oll dialnlactod upon oomplohon 9 Yo; D No 15 PUMP: Monuloctwor'o Eon-- L‘ l A- L .-CJ.uZ'U.L ND - 1 ' $54 It. oopocIty .PM. Iodol 3’ ‘ Longtlt of Dion Pia C] D Rooigoooflng Ty”: Sohonlblo Jot ‘1‘ ‘33-. Jouorb, golovotion, oootoo oI doto, on. 21.2.5.3 mm. 8; 1.2.51 Lia. Hus! N0. l'I urea wELL CONTRACTOR s CERTIFICATION. . Thia woll “Ono boat :1 mWI-Im .- uo “Not I .y iwiodtollon ood Ohio '0'." Io boo oky hot-ma old bollol. ./ 1 132 ' h- .—'u- H --T--; 3” .I. _ '- '-'r r _T- CT.-CSJCALSQ°.-SYS-‘.'J7‘LEN: l | ' .| l I! I I 1- ___ ...... L_J L._g_l l_ L L4--L_J .- r _ __ WATER WELL RECORD MICHIGAN Dari-91:45.41 J‘~.’ ACT 29‘ PA 1965 OF '1 LEELTLLQE gm 1 - M'— __If’aL'C "Em" ' '.““, Tu, FvocIQon Scenes. No. Town lRonoc } .:-~'.-u-‘ Tron-I any - n ___..- — ‘-;:~_‘I_~ .ar_.______- 2:] .-- '."VTT 1&5 '.“: “'1. El“. D-Haa. 9. An: L‘uch-on Ito: RooJ InIcuoc'oon: {Q ~‘ ".3.. 3 ONNER 0F WELL ‘ l 1" '. . : '4- 535935351310“ .-. :0. éuao L'Jru A.!O.:' 1.3:";91‘3: . a. J {1.3394 115. on i? side of a. 3;.211-10 Dr. “"m .,~- 2 . . . ‘ r. ‘ ~ ‘ ” w’ls 313’ 5' co' aii'oos 5 CH7 cl WCII Locohon m9 1 13“}..0?» A x. o) 111113.} LEI: ' bk! VIZ-.08 (“-q-Qe’ T'ip'. --\ --.y1 ‘ hut-mi SS 0!".- 15 2 FORMATION OI’ 93?YOI.9 0' ‘ WE LL 05 P I II, (complolod) ’DGII ol Comalotmn snnuu SliAT‘U'.‘ 113) h. {I'M/‘9 . 5 [:1 Cable In: L. Ro‘ o'y r Drwon DDug o l, ' i b 15 C] Ho“:- rod 0 JoIIod [3 Bond 0 _ . 6 USE. a Bonus“: D Public Supply D Induony 31;"? ”.‘a‘u‘3l 23 35 D IIIigaIion 0 Ah Condinoning D COMOICIQI i D To" v.“ D ‘ 1.. .. $' .. fl _ 1 I and -. grave; 37 z.‘ 7 02'1“" 1.1mm: B “14.40 :Hoigh': Abovom E 1 ‘ in. Io ESL". DoleI "whee—LII. - cc \ 3.3. 123 paw—45.1... I in. Io ___JI. DopIh JDNV. Shoo? YOIBNOD .v A ‘ O 9' .. J: 25 133 8 SCREEN 53'” 3 ' , Tun“ ' ‘ 05°” gs: -‘ _ 7 1L) $101 ’53.." Longvh II. oni ___. _ 1'. So! blIweon Fiflm;s: -——.—_- _._— 9 sun: wncn LEVEL 1" II. Inla- Iond suolaco 10 PUMPING LEVEL boIow load ouvloco -._.- __ II.oIIn Ins. ow,‘ - "34 on. i II. oIIoI Mo. ;--, —: 9.... ll NATE? QUALITY .n Porn Pu H.Il.on.;§i:}3jm 1 Ivan (Fol Chluidos (C11 I Hordnou . ’- 12 we LL HEAD COMPLETION. [:1 In ”no... P5. :__ El Pith" AdooIoI D 12" Above Ccofio l3 snourmc. loll Ground? E3 Yo: D No . _._. - Mo'onol: D Noo' ComonI D I Doom: FIon—JI. Iq_II. I 14 sunny: L Noon" Sowco oI o'oulblo cwhntnouon _fiJooI _s_D.Io¢Iion "‘“ "" “T ' .o Ioll disinIocIod upon comoIoIion u Yoo D No ‘ 15 PUIAP- IonqucIquI' o Nona-:acbvroi Idol Nut-Down? Long". of Du, Woo—h?— . cooocl ~ .PJI. D D Rulncofin' Suououiolo JoI Typo: 8 15 Ron-ed... ole-“Ii”, souIeo ol JoIo, on. 9 ~"-'. film I‘CJ 17 IATER VELI. «manor 5 cemmcnmy: TI.“ all vi: ,Jdllod undo: .y ithchIIon on! {hit upon Io It... Io IIIo bouolovy 1.1.9er of.‘ bolloI. ; 5 - ‘ . -' ,In I :'o : 3““ - ‘ ' Zn,“ ' "' _ » oooIonon ouomcoo out f, ' . I. nonunion ’45. ‘ _ .' -. :.. "a. 1‘ . ' ‘1‘} .._. -.._.,...__ -—.~——... - -.——- .CSICAL SURVEY SAMPLE No. l R; l 133 EDCDDEUJBEDUZD 721 WATER WE LL RECORD ”cum oenaman ACT 2'" PA I965 0' r” ' " ; LOCATION or thL I - muc ”an” LI ’40", Twp. Flocvion ‘f {union No. F " Tm " " I... “ , ,. _1 max-mm .. y. 55,; ac- ‘l m’. I - Fenc- And Dilcclion Inn Rood Innructiuu WN p F g : [O'NER No- I 3 o 5 0 E“ A.‘ .z. icizzayer ‘4‘,.“ 1:663 I'm Dr. "'c-—:~ 32?. his 3",“ 959m" 3 CIIy oi Well Loco'ian ,I6911 S‘s—wry! -. ‘-- "3- '-"-’“Z- Vig'k- L' 3’ C an ' ‘ t 'c :3 0'7 . - 3 Fonunuou m g; s .gmzvg' 4 VELL oepm. (con-gloved) MdC-nplohm - - "anon mum» h. 5 D Coblo tool a Rotary Dvivm “I! -. _ ,1: 3o 30 D Hollow :94 D Jon“! 0 Soul 0 ..— , d 6 us: 8 on...“ [J Public 3...» D Ian-mp , e.-.1 :. ”pan; .‘ g; f 8 I D Inigofion D M: Calida-lag 0M v D To" '0" D #_ f 11 fl 7 0;?“ 1mm CkquiuddmAh-nm :uflu‘q. _ “p Noun—15"“- _Lin. .0. . a“. 0...,“ _._—in. M __JI. D. II! Dtivo Shoc?'u .U 8 SCREENzngne § ‘ TY'C' 9‘. 1 -——:— > ' ;'-—— 5'00/c-ul- lq.L_..—’ I So! boh- - h. and __JO. FHNII'I: 9 s'nmc nun LEVEL ‘ h. balm-v Ind sodas. It \ 10 PUHPING LEVEL “I... load «um ) 5' C“.l___ht‘. p.093 4... ___—1‘. ohm ha. fl"; 4: 9‘ 11 um: QUALITY In Pom P» “Elfin: m Ina (F.L____—__— Chloflkt {fl}. #— l1 1 I 12 we LL new couPLUIou. U I. Apr-v“ Pu H mm. “.2... D 12” “on and. l3 snowmo- Vu" Gum-d? a You D No Manual: 0 Nu! Comm! QT Depth: Flu—___”. bk. 14 awn": Nam” Souno 0' pot-IN- cow- foot ._79. *Dmcflu no I'll dioinhctod upon caplofion You No 15 MP: Hebtrol , ”kw-'5 "cl-W Mel tam—”p Loam .I on. pa,._}g...u. “H11. . Typo: Subaru-bl. __ #— ‘ ,.. 94w...” ‘5 Ruined”. flbvofiu, sows. a. do”, on. ’ ' '4‘.“ in“ “‘-I v ..§.:\.’. . ‘33er f ‘ . av, - 1.’}~ ‘~ l7 urea we LL coutucmn-s csmncmou. TM: walla-us Jvillod M00 by ludsdicfin ”I I“ top." R no 0.» I'll- has! 0‘ a, bro-Mo «I halide , .fi - u- ‘: '. 0‘ n 0‘ IO. “'0 -q ’.0 fi‘ ' #T‘.’ :‘g 9 031.5" “unit a. 9‘ " T"..,.'..".’. o' .4 ‘ ‘r ..-. . -- ‘ I" 'f-ry-‘éu ‘ '.“-‘00.“ I 0... n‘ ’I ”A“. -, . "; ' ' ‘ .' Q . . .. ". ’ .2“!‘ Jazfi...‘ \ .9 2‘ o- ”J_~ ’ ‘ i .’ I " . I ‘.J" 3" E "fquuyyp-a. : M_Z__; M‘T ~_.--o--‘ M.--—._---o—-——.—----- 134 —_-. I -—-oo—.-..- GEOLOGICAL SURVEY SAMPLE No. [7 I I II I JULI I I ILI II I U 733 VAT!!! IELL RECORD momma OEPnnIEm oCY 2” PA I”: or /6/ W LOCA'HON or wELL l Puouc "an" - 11 If..." _. Top. floofioo ' Soon“ No. You Ioooo ' hfldfln mu 5! I n u I 29 ms. EN. no And nous-n hon Rood lMouocNono 3 mg; OF 'ELL: m E I n o: Sequoi- n. M 11111 3: Roller, launder: Shoot .44.... L City oI loll LocoolonW YIDCIIIS! 01,700 70 FORMTIW 0' oonou o: no... 995 Applogato, loot Lansing, Minn ”Inna sYIAYuu 4 VIE LL DEPTH: («mum o... .I coma“. F 5 E Coblo Egg. 0 RoquT C] mu... rod D mm U and 2 say; :18: W M 6 USE:8 Donooflc D Publlo Supply 0 lodvury lnloofion D My Conditioning 0 Comovclol D To" Ioll D :5 m ———38 AI}!— @L. _@ .1501— II- 7 ‘33:” 1......“ mm D --u.a.m: “mm Lln to my. and. owioco__1__h. --IolflIL__Jh/h. ___lo. 9o _10. Do I.» Dclvo Shoo? Yo 8 SCREEN: la. 1'... 9|. 2 '7‘ ’."/6" l. l -:0h ‘00 5.* II. and h. Flnlngo: 9 sunc u'rEn LEVEL 3a : :h. boIo- Ind oodoco IO PUMPING LEVEL m.- load oodooo '0 ohm—+5“. mug—and .o.- . my ___—19. oloor ha. , ,‘ g—‘-_e. ‘7 ll vnEa QUALITY a. Pom Poo mum: lion (FOL—Chlofldoo IC“ Hovdnoo~____ 12 VE LL HEAD COUPLEtIou: UI. A...“ Pu Pm... u. o! Q1715... and. l3 caommc. Ioll Gounod? B Vol 0 No notorioJ: D Nooo CoaoM D 00.05: Flu—J9. M—‘L ll “mum: Noon“ Sootoo o! ooulblo coon-lulu +'”' I—“W 'ofl JIololofloJ upon co-plofloa B You 0 No 15 ”MP: “mml “ofooMov'o No- Idol flu-50%"? Loo'lh .I Ovoo PIp._hg_II. MIW. Pu. Two: Soot-lovabl- D Jo! D'oflmfln a. ‘ Rough. oiovofloo, oooroo ol loco. on {if Imovummu . mam-v. c.:‘ M"... o ~ . . , - ' ~ 0.70 '00. 17 um VELL comnc'roa s ceuIPIcmouI TM- voll woo Mllod moor n7 lulodlocloo and filo noon lo woo to fio hoof _o' Dy Boo-lodoo ond bu... , ' . W 135 . ---.o—---—...—_-... --. «.. - , -— W-W.M..... . mmljl‘T l l HT] '. r . I: ‘ , 0-6 2 4 137.. WATER WELL RECORD IIIcchu DEPARTMENT Acr no PA ms I LOCATION OF WELL M'C "9U" I‘m...” ' '."”- -— — {gamma Nom- FIoCIIon Socuon W Town Hm lanoo NM “_ng Uta M: ".83 as m 6 mo. 1 1m. mro Ana DIIequn loom Rood IIIIovoL-cIIono ovyutn OF WELL: 6520 Cbmnaho Du Ohm-0o 305‘" "11 “‘m 4520 W D-. aka-III. In. as“ Shotch Hop: 4 WELL DEPYH: Icomolowdl Dow III leou’on 8” II. ”/75 5 I3 Coblo Iool Boon" I: DIIoon D On. '3 H020“: 006 D Jolloo I: load 0 6 ““1 rI Oman: D MIIE Supply D "-6”on DIIIIQJIIM D A" CWIEIOI'IIII. D Conn-Ind Dlofl Noll l I 4 7CA$|NG “voodoo mung IIoIgm. anon/onu— ILo——l out! _.II 'wim _1_ll TIIIEIIIIEII uPTII To _Lm. .. _n". 0”". ".,.,“_11_.”',,‘. '2 FORMATION or IOTTOII or "anon “anon In. Io II. Doom 13mm Shoo? Voom no [:1 _— 8 scum: in}: J You: ___“, Wm: M ‘ So: bolwoon lI. ond ll. ‘IIIInoI‘ M &d 56 w §IIIIII .IJIIIIIu I. Cllo ul Wall LocoIIon " III so-rlmn Folow ‘II‘; :I‘Il-;.II'\ ”X I L. - J Ema“ [IA/c 9 STATIC IVATEE LEVEL £2 H. bola. Iona ouloco Io PUAIPTIVG LEVEL boIoo loud outloco 'T --r... ll. oIIoI _Mo. mm. 0.9.1“. AIR lI. o'lov__ loo. 9mm. o.o.III. ll IVATEII QUALITV III PoIIo PoI uIIIIoII: \ar "on No) Chlomloo ICll Moreno“ 0000' 12 WELL IIEAO CMETION: D u. A...“ PII Dritlou AdooIoI [:1 l2" Abovo 60o“ ‘3 ooII GIoIIIoII? Bus 0 No D NooI Comm 0 IomoMIo D W— DooIlI: noun '1. Io II. 2. L. I N NooIosI Sowco ol oouiblo conIonIII'IoIIo-I m lool fl OIIocIIon 3.2. Tm loll oI'oIIIvocIoo ”common” Duo I IMO ‘5 m I C] on ammo A Wootuor'o u-no W Mod-l um______ ”WM" #— Loooto ol Duo Noo_“_ nauoocnyfclx. on A no soon If anon ‘ . ' 'J : Yvoo: Sol-mono D loclotocoIIII. ‘4 4 16 m. olovotion. owco of don. otc. I .. .5 7 ”fin WELL CONTRACTOR? CEWIFICATION: o); v“ .‘No ooll woo oclllod “0' no lodoolaloo on! No «out to too noon W0 or ”In". nu. W 6 .q ‘9 .h' I. "I. be» III III Ewan and hung. \ " coaumo J) Hr. - .,.___._ _-_ .1 ___, -. ' MIMI MAM : ”'JllMII To one: '« “1‘ Ian. Iloo. I“! . .'~ .. 136 GEOLOGICAL SURVEY sAIIPLE NO. | q I I II I IL—II I I I ILJ II I Uri IIAIER I'IELL RECORD mum ommeuv " ACT ”I PA 1m 0' 1 LOCATION OF IIELL l mu“ "nu" Com», Top. FoooISoII 1' SooIIoII No. a I'm W loooo w -\ Ingham Horidion w {E II}; II ‘20 ‘1 III/ I A. to And DIIoCIIoII IIoIII lood IIIIoIoOCIIoIIo OINER No 3 O'NEl OF '5 LL: 7 0' Heat of Camacho Dr. L——J John D1ono 50' North “*0" 2600 Coohioo {Show cum. 8 Cily oI Ioll LocoIioII s.” OkemO. H1Ch18‘n 2 fonu‘non Y::::':::I .EEEEE’YE' ‘1';L5L DEPTH: “union” DoZILoIglIIIB Iain S U CoIIIo lool I] loIory D OIIooII U Do. . C1.) 10 10 D Hollow too D Jollod 0 Bond 0 _ 5 USEzm DoIIIooIIC B Public Sup”, 0 IMO-Icy S‘fld & Gr‘VOI 7° 80 D lnigoIIoII D Air CoIIJiII'oIIiII. D CounoIclol 0 Tool Vol! D 61;! 15 I 95 > 7 SII'NG' madam II.II.IID Imam: Atom/W \b/ _°_:III. III ”_II. Do'III IouIIoco II. Sholo & $3!)er ZJ 120 lo.'I.III__J_1_III/II. ‘ III. III _._.II. Do III __flmrgok 35 151 I SCREEN; Inc-__flflnl 9h - SloI/G-un l .95 SoI ooh-o II. and J3. FIIIIII”: 9 snréc IIILTER LEVEL II. bolo- lond oorIooo 10 PUMPING LEVEL Id..- I.“ ”II“. II. dug—boo. T” Not Boqutreé_ _' ___—II. oIIoI..._hn. , ll 'ATEl QUALITY III Pqu Poo fléllioII: IIoII URL—___— CIIIoIIJoo QC“ Not Required HoIJIIoo 12 IE LL IIEILO COuPLETIOII: C] I. an...“ Pll E mu... Adomr D I2" AI... Grodo l3 GROUTING: You 0 No Ioll Ground? W— MoIoIIol: D NooI ConoIII DopIII: From—II. lo__II. 14 SANITARY; Noon-I Souoo oI Eulblo ooIIIo-IIIoIIoII IooI ”alum—LI,” Voll JIIIIIIocIoJ um ooanoIIoII Q You 0 No Is '0”: Rod Jookot MonoIocIotoI'o “—- IIuII unhflfm—ML— LonoIlI oI Duo Ploo II. oooooIImey. In“ I) sou-mm. D J» D looIzocoIIII. 1‘ local» oIoooIIoII. ooIooo oI duo. do. .-.uI. mu IIL__ ten-I IIIIC. .: Wyflw mmfiil! “M 79‘", ‘°°" “\m ‘| 'nCO 17 WATER IELL CONTRACTOI'S CER‘IIEICIIIIOII: I “do ooll woo dIIIIoJ who .1 Mum-I no filo upon Io no Io in to" “why hmlodooonl hoIIoI. ,. o 0“ M cant-30¢ SURVEY SAMPLE No. I 2 0 l “J F] LOCAIIOIIDE wELL L WATER WELL RECORD ACT 294 137 PA I965 Milan 1 1%? IAICHIGAN DEPARTMEN‘I 9' 2. OF PUBLIC HE ALTH p.— )W) 1:1:an T". ifetidian FICCIIO'I jf‘ISZI’) $2511.); 9 SoClIOII No. Town Rongo ___--- _ .— .r,!J:P\:': A‘Fd Dnvoihon Ira-n Road lnlouochons M. .. CL: imersec’cicn Of Okemos ’3.- i.:—.‘.:;,' JlEJo than lLJI' S of latter IOWNER No.—___I 1_£1 L "41 3 DquR or IIELL; ' 0. II. Aldrich 2323 Y‘all] hdo’ East Lansing, Idc‘rigzn Addvoso :S'reov 002-33 & C-Iy DI Well LOCOIIOH 2323 Rab] Rd. East 1:133ng 2 FORMAYION IHICS‘IJSS 53:31.73: 4 VIE LL OE PTH. (complolod) Dolo oI Com'lolicn 57“!qu SIRIYJIJ 19,5 II. Q/QASQ 5 D Cobflo IOOI :3 ROIOIy r LJ DIIIIoII D Du; 15 15 D Hollow rod [3 JcIlod D Band D _— 19 :44. 6 USE ' E3 DomoolIC D PublIE Supply D Inigolion D Air CondIIioniIIg U IDJUIII’ D Comovciol D Ton VloII D r_:1;'~'?.L 22 55 7 €23,166: ThIoodod f3 Wo'dod DjII‘Ioi'IH: ADMIN/Sh: I _gLI'n. III 23.“ OoplII :ouIIoco 1 II. L’LISJLIL" 14': 70 IUoighI_ll__lbI/II. ' III. IO —II. Dogl'n lDIivo Shoe, YosBNorj 4.191 1' ~ 1': ‘I 3‘. 11 ._ 8.1) 8 SCREEN \‘ / Typo‘ Die.- —I: u 95 -- . U __ SIOI’CIDJIo _____ Longl __ .. - ~.__::__-_‘.__:_I._x_ 3 13 133 Sol bol‘oon II and JI FIIIIngs: 4.1;:- 1. 10 11¢: _- 9 STATIC wATER LEvEL _ ; 2 120 ___ZQ—II. hclow Iond lU'IOCl 10 PUMPING LEVEL bole—v load ouIIoco _' _‘h’t‘fi 15 2.35 __3_§__II. .IIGIl-hll. pumping_.39____.¢.p.n. II. .IIoI_-lIn. , ,' _ :.p.m. ’ 11 WATER QUALITY III Pens Pot MIIIIorI' *__ lion (Fo) Chlovido: (CH HoIdnoI 12 we LL HEAD COMPLETION: D II. An...“ PI: 5 a PIIlcss Adoprov D I?" Abooo Gun!" 13 cnommc Woll Glaulod’ E) You O N: __— -------- _ Malorial; 0 Fur Cunonl D 7'- '1‘14 “' ‘1': Bomb: FIOIII—JI. In__II. 14 SANITARY: NooIooI Sourco III pouiblo contouinovion _7O_‘ Iool _L‘_06Io:lion_£f’.._..i.C—__:“ 7y” 'olI diIInIoClod upon conglolion B You D No I 15 PUMP: b HonquclquI's Nan-- Pad Jflc“"h ’ Modol NunboflME‘J—HPJ— S C: 2 2 27 92> Longlh oI DIop Nomi-LII. copocinch.P.M. Typo: SubIIIouibIo D «" 6 erorlu, .IIVOIIOI‘I, ooutco oI doIo. ole. x. -2 ;.-._.;,.~ my II». ELBSO SIII'. l IIIIOYIIC. "II-III DAM JoI D RoolzrocoIint 17 IIAIER IIELL CONTRACTOR'S CERTIFICATION: TIIIo coll woo JIIIIoJ uIIJoI on luriodlcllon oIId IIIlo no" lo woo Io in hot oI on know-lodgo oIIJ boIIoI. I. ID 9 n 0.. 0‘ Dolo ’71, {412... 13 I .I GEOLOGICAL SURVEY SAMPLE No. .. f r I": 2' COU"I .' 8 CDCDDFTTI—IEFIFEM Ingham I-ieridian l ’" J6— WAIEII :‘VELLHRECORD 7-1, MICHIGANOEEPARIMENI 1 LOCATION qr WELLj PUBLIC HEALTH Townvup Nana; hung-n Sectaon Numbm Inwn Numbu R . .c «whim: £353" 9 T4 ALI—ELLE. L0-_ 1. - w "_- "'7‘..— m selen Dclow‘LfiZSIBttgwfman F: T Do ostancc And Duccuon Mom “on! Inlersechons 1/10 zine East or Okemos Rd 0n Baby Rd North Side 2090 Lot fr‘ 58 Has t: Half 01‘ fic;;on 9,2;easngf Acre Subdivision 3 OWNER 0‘ v. ELL: Tom Clayton Associates,1nc Address 2011.N. fiat st. lensing, Iflchigan 4 WELL DEant Icemalcxco) Date 0! Comoiehon u. J?..'l,br. 1972 5 Cable :30! D Rouvv D Oman [3 Dog HoHor. to: gJenPd D Don” C] 6 USE: Bumsuc U 'UDIIC Supply C] Indusuv f ”r I I I _J__I-_:-_. .. quI i I . “3P ”_-J----L——I——-<‘ -Bab b! ' x Rd L | I I T “a! —..1._—T——'—--I‘MI. a: ' i i J— :2: F—IU.L'-—-o-v n Dlmgmon D A" Cond-tionmo D Comic-OI [but the“ D 7 81$ch Thmaded. wudodD Tho-9hr Abovclaozow I m. I Swine 1 II. YHICKNCSS OEPYu Ya Lin. to 9L". Ocmh |“¢'°'"3-2i—"”-/"~ .' FORMATION "flaw against _.m' ‘0 ___ n. beam 10.... Sh“, y.,§~,fl . 8 scan». L.._San:2_;:._Cl:—;;g 18 18 “29' “one D-a.: P933 Slot 'Gwm £9133____ ”no... noaa | £193 113 31 Sat botwccn_ In. and II. Fun-has.- “one .L__Cla3L_L_erarel 2; 58 ) L___s;~.na. mane 2 I [__SEMPCW 8 .Jlnafimzl 8; C12! 12 ,3le ___—Gralfihala .-._- G"? :1 5M .___.___L,_§9__L_1§O 9 smnc mum LEVEL _3__0___ I'. Delays land szac: ‘0 FU‘-'P:NG LEViL b-Hcm land su'Ince £9: II. after ___ms. Dung-n9 £11633 g.p.m. _th n. chm—ms. puma-no __me 0.9m. I? II WATER CLIALITV m Pails Pu! Mull)"; "on (Fu :1 Chlondcs ICII mm____ N Hardness Eat—__Olhor __kfim \ . v \ I 12 WELL HE A0 COMPLETION; C] H, ”mm.“ m E Duties: Adapter E 12" Above Grade ‘3 w-sl' Orr-uted’L Vu-s D No [3 Mac: Conn-'1! 0 Benton”. EELS—CL‘ACI! C I '2‘:— l _— 035' 9‘. Flo-r“ It. lo It. 1‘ Nuvcu Souvce ol cosmos. cmtmnouoo 5° Iooluopthivorjuon Sept :izn-a“ Tvuc We” dcsmhclcd upon cmienofi] Yes D No 15 PUMP. 0 no: Inflation “Maneuvers Nome W woe-I Numboc Mo... H'ivw‘ .115.— (I) G) 7 b. Longm 0! Drag MALL II. capacity G.'.M. Type: D Submnubie Z] 4M [3 Iniovocmng on A no IOIIIV Iv nuato 29E» 16 Remarks. elevation. source of data. etc. .---~ ' :‘fZORIU-ER. [151* h" 17 WATER WELL CONTRACTOR'S CERTIFICATION: TM. well was 6mm «MO! my “addiction and this man in Inn to "I. bust oI my knowlOOnO 006 NH“. ICGISTIICD ”SHE’S NAME Il‘ogltflfl I9. www.— 139 1 I '3 5.1,. CG'CAL SUPvIEY SAMPLE Na L:—27=? [[3 Elm mm m] MICHIGAN Di PARTIENT WATER WELL RECORD A ”65 DUB LIC HEALTH . or FORIIATIOP. sun-v.14 (1' Call: iaol Dom-"i: Public Snyply lulu-"y Irrigation Air Cudi'ioninc Com-urgiul Tkioadcd in. IQ 61$" SID: S" be". "u Plump: wATER LEVEL LEVEL below land lul'ntc III-r IHI. p-;n,lng_____a.y.n. Iv, nhov hu. pumping__._....p.m. “ATE“ OUAIIJTL-‘In _Pcru Pu MaIIia-‘I. , _ A4 .' Iron (F'5;J-/ - ”(Chloridu Hordnu WELL ”EAD COMPLETION: In Apyuvtd PII nu mama? D 1.. U N: /\ Nu'flm': CI Neat Cami-u SANITARY: FURL”: Manuhclwu'u NedoI Longrfi 0' Drop Typ': R'moi'll, div-lion, some. 0' Ion. alt. WATER WELL CONTRACTOR'S CERTIFICATION: and M. up" In in hymn IMO n1 Dawns-1:... awn flash 5:. X 6/ d -. navtm 5“, --._- - GEOLOGICAL SURVEY SAMPLE No. l a 3] 140 CDUJDLLLDLLJEIE _wATEP. IIELL RECORD MICHIGAN DEPARTIIIENT ACT ”4 PA I965 ' OF I LOCATION OF wELL l IVE 9F* ' Puu'c "5“” "I, ‘ Twp. I I I Froclion SecIion No. Teem Rouge -I ' . A M4! ‘ M'VI-fd’ ;[) (_EIA vtilfiflfiw _ _l __ _._—An . y "’1' I _‘A DIeIorIee' And Oi’reeIion Irem Rood InIereeeIIons 3 OWNER OFI “ELL 7 3 OWNER No. 2.4 I /,.».4/.... 5 Wash U ’4/ L . ___] flkié-CJJJZA/L’ v’ .. fat—cf.) J2. ‘74 15L}— .. 5.71:1 M: 4’ V? ('-“:ng “an" 1.3.9 2 ' WI“ fl" " ‘7 SI'eeI address A Cin oI Well LoeoIiorI 5'15 3":- '.4 3,1... . -mCL' 1% ‘f_"4..---d SJ/é”(:¥ Z FORMATION TNIC;;I£SS 'gfiigztgt 4 WELL DEPTH (cempleled) (.6090 III Comple: Ion SIRATULI 5:“qu / \’; 15' I. )1- “in- (‘5 A! '1 \ f 5 D Coble Iool CI Ro'ery U Driven 6009 (M4, , VI (J (A o fl‘l‘lollow rod [3 JeIIed D Bond D __ (I J ? 6 USE goomestie B Public Supply D Induury r AME 21. I / O C) O D InigoIion D Air CondiIiorIirIg 0 Commercial ‘ TOII Well D [Ll/0v; I 1 p24- ,ig.) /. 50 fl 7 9:19“; TlIreodedBdVelded D IIIeighI: Above/Below pf fl 7‘ 9 a In. Io f II. Depth 'eurIoee II. )‘VJILA y (‘7 l " O IWeIgI'II-__'__lbe/II ' . ’. -- _ l r _’ _._.“ In. Io '—"__.II. DQIII [Dnve Shoe, YOSBNOD . :- L ‘- .1 (Iii )‘j‘ .L. 41 ’5. 4.1”. 1.6.1,” “ LJ. (fig, /\" ’) 8 SCREEN ,A/ ,v —-—~—-- SID? 'COUxe LengIh - .— SeI beIrreeI-I VIE-end -JI. FIIIinge: ____,..._—~ 9 51g): ATER LEVEL L __ —.—4»————~ ___.II below lend SUIIoce ,— IO PUMPING LEVEL below lend eUIIece “"""’II. oIIeI IIre. ;--;'-; >- -.p.III f... I I _ ,. . - Ir. oII'er II". ; ,’ _ “:.p.m II WATER QUALITY In For" Pet Mullion: Iron (Fe) W’— CIIIerldee (Cll Herdneo 12 um HEAD COMPLETION: C] In Aw...“ Pu D PIIlese AdopIer m I?" Above Groz'e 13 GROLITING Well GrouIed’ D Yes E} No ( f. MoIerIol; D NeoI CemenI Dv ’3 IX .1"; I") '4’; DepIII: FIoIII__,’_II. I I. ' 14 SANITARY: Home" Source eI peulble centeInIrIoIion .1 IeeI Diteei-Mj' ['."/'6’ TVPe Well dieinIeeIed upon senileIlen Be'ee D No / 15 PUMP: , ‘ unnggtupge'. Narn- D’D IL/O} lfl/ST.‘\ LL " Hedel Numb """"""' HP """"‘ LengIlI eI Drop Pipe—{_II. ee'eeIIy 4PM. Type: D Submeceible D “'- 0 JeI-r/ D Reei «noun 4'6 am»... an“... eeuree .I deIe, m. 17 IIAIEP IIE LL CONTRACTOR'S CERTIFICATION: .. . '- This well wee drilled under any ludedIeIIeII end IIIIe need Ie I've ‘ W INFO. 'Y mull. II“ In Io IIIe beeI eI my ham-ledge end. Self“... - go on} OEOE “RHINO "3 M eeeIeIeeee eoeIeeee eeue ‘ nee-ovum» rue. Adi-“- W‘Md ’3' "MA WDIIIOII m w . fl' . '.‘ .- I - 4' " 1 ~ fit) $39~91.3.‘Z..T__"‘.L'.‘;’.:r’" “ " Dove ILL" -- ”I ‘ 7.. 141 @‘ (I: -JIOC|CAL sum/Iv SAP.‘..-"1F Nu. E::2:LU _ - [I] U] D mm m ;‘ . ,- WATER WELL RECORD MICHIGANODEPARTFIIENT . ‘ PA IDC' F I Loc mow OI WELL I , . ' PUBLIC HEALTH 3; [Im- «In D N..v Punt-uh Sect-WI humhul ‘ToI-m Nuncuu in“: Huh-2L1 . ,’ I 9" M/wrf/ r)? /7Z/ ; I - '« l: '- ..‘Z/ ’1 ~11. / g'w. KI'L'.) P’C'F -705!“ (1" M (U3 :_,(_4_4.L'_ .? AddIess ”mm L s I. I .I v --:_~ 2.0!: - ' \‘,':'.' LO ..J_l|:_/ -_/ - "231,; /(3)/ (Zr/J Jfitofi, ‘_ fl’ZWLA-gf; .4.» i0 ' ~ " ' ‘ " " "I "‘2" /S~clrv \I I‘ 4 WELL OZPTH‘ IcomplexcaI Dan- 0! Co~alenon- r.__.-.l- ———7 - —;r-—--'I h 10:20 It. I— I . _ .1 -- ..:.. _:_ —. p“? 5 E] Ceb'e (on! g Rotaw D Dnven E3 Dug I l I \ D Hollaw '03 D Jetted D Boved D l l ‘_ " " ‘1' ’ ’4' " -:’ _ “ T 6 U553 EDWSHC [3 Public Supo'v D lhdusny I | .‘ _ \ b l 3 Dungshon D An Condiuomng D Comma! F-fi’fiT-g/Wd'“. ‘ DchIwm D I ' L I I 1 7 CASING Thvcadedg WeldedD lHquM: Abow’BelOw Hon h . I34) lm- «Dc/ 3 OVINEH 0’ WELL: (3 r , j: /:.ZW W M, (w:./ W l ' 0 3m 1 I . -L—O-——l I- _l -———.'| lsu'.’:. 'T. ' fulCM-Ess oc-‘Y- 7; . . 23 . h: ,l , I? F “.‘.' ‘TICN Or eonw 3r 4""1 '° "' 0““ 1“”9 LL'”" " I S'NYUV S'N'UV In. to '1. Doom 10mm Shoe? \es an ,,___ _-.__._.___ ___...._.._...__-____. _.-___ —-——. ——-— £2 E] ‘ . ’ [I 8 SCW‘N‘ . T/' s. . I I ‘l , > '- “—- I I" / Kt/ ~- ff/ 5) J ._ _ 1 -___ _ '/_-—’/..r _-_ --- _ .__ _ , .___; _ __ ___ __ _ _ . 'x-nr __ of, -\ o..I.; ' I - . . SI 20.1. :c [h i I. V/ I ( -1, ‘f .I < 5" 3 J '————— Long .- ._-/- i. _;1’. - -..._.-.- _-_- -_-.....__T :_’_ I .ftfi...___‘_. Setbmvcen ft. end It. . I ., ~ _-——- ‘In-ngs: C. :VI /,; 42/; ’ ' ‘2 ' -— 1’.~—.—_—ak:—_ — _ —- — ——-——- _- .._—._—>-.—1‘ I L—{t t L- I 9 S—TATIC “ATE“ LEVEL I I'\ z s ' ‘v <' h' " I,’ . I, ’~‘ - )' ___ ..5 4 :_ __ t .‘ h.:(,(/ I“ __ - .--. _”___.--___ --J... __ b\4_\.)__ ___.-t .. "' ”2.0“ '.fid sudare IO VQMDIFQ LEVEL below land suvlace ' ‘ If ~0'- ’ I :3 "" /’0 . ! a \, f' ‘ (I . .1 o,_i_}f/ - , - _ ‘ .J / Li: ‘ Al 2 h. ‘01:! l‘. pup-mung / °,p,v~._ ' __ M . chev- hrs. Dummy 9.0.m. _, _._-....— — - - .- .- ._ .. . .._.- _--_-_ ..._ —_ .-...-._— _._— _—-—.—I -———..——.- 11 v. my: CpAL ITY In Port! POI Mm: on Iron IFe' Algrgfimnucwakfi’ A 12 WELL HEAD COMPLETION; D M ”9,0,“, m | .. - _ - - _ L Hardness ___—Other I L _leloss Adapter D 12" Above Grade 13 \a IGOCUILL’DVVS DNO ‘ U Nu: Cent-m gacnmmw D p—.. —- . ......-_—._-._-..._.. . ___.-- ——._- — 01:0“ FIonI h. ID 9|. ___—..— 14 Name“ Source of nossIbIe conunmeuon co..." Lawson Whoa Won dIs‘Inlected upon completion '2 Yes D No 15 www- L . . - 6...... . ..... Ema) ' (Mia-t )1 | - L- .. ___. _._ ._ . Length 0' Drop Pipe I. cepacinvvfifivag : A .‘ \ Typo: B Submersible I .. C: Li.) . C] . . ,_ _ V J" D Iocmrocalmo usr. A the snttr l' nu coco 65A 16 Remarks. elm/anon. scurce of data. etc. I7 WATER WELL CONTRACTOR'S CERTIFICATION. has II was culled undev m Imisdicuon end this I”! Is nee ) .‘.‘-.;'['.' It... :‘I c&.u£k..lim% .. ,' d _ c. '.'..1' ' g... 1? EL g7 Z) nmsuuo susuum um: usIsnAnoII IIo. ' Aamessflnd. ..' ' T' 7// . 57'9"“ 4.J:9?W ._ Owe—9:- .12. 7.2.. L..._-..-_..___.-._--_.--. -_ .- ._.-____ -. _._--..-.. .--.._--__.- “Y"" a ..—5- GEOLOGICAL SURVEY SAuPLE No. 2 S , .‘ l LOCATION_9_F__\VELL 1 Ceanty Twp. L -, - M no And ttothon Item Reed Intersection. p.97 . --_._,_._.-,__ ,. - WATER WELL RECORD ACT 29‘ 142 PA 1965 / tection NLU‘ND)’. NW- 7/ 4 MI}. sunflocm 1.... sum, '1; ) [guNER No.__:—__l 3 omen or WELL:R°8° DaYOUnc mm s. Hagadorn Rd., Cinemas, Hickman Addteu 2'129'1‘9'31' '- _c.., or 3"." L_°‘°"°" mi“ 9km t c 2;: cm 1 1’ _._-.- ' -— l 2. ronuncm W 5‘: "no: 3' 4 VIE LL DEP‘IH (co-ml...“ Du. .t Conplehon _ _ SYlA-YUM_ _ Stlnuu it. 6.8 3 5 Cable tool [:1 Rotary E! Duvets “Tic". : EM"! .1 c] __. ___ __ _ é; 37 _[13 Helm-3.4 _ D June C] 8..“ _U ._ r 6 USE Contests: B Public Supply D lnduetty ssnd 1'1 50 D htigotien D Mt Conditioning 0 CWMOICDO| .- '- D Test Well ‘ c] :3; _, 5 1' SSL‘ 7 83:“ than!“ I wanna trump"; non/w int. to __lt. Depth :eutlece___1__h. ‘Mdro “: L5 10 Weight—_lh/tt. in. to —Jt. leg“. [Duve Shee’ YeJoD «moat-mic ,5 1_?5 Bscneenflom Typo' 05.3 i“ " "— — ' Slot/Gena. Length I ~‘ - _ _ _ Set between It. end It. e 2 Ftttangsz 9 sunc “Ten LEVEL h. below lond Ivige Well Created? a Yes D No 10 Pwpmc LEVEL we. lend eutece )__ (t. ettet._hn. , r‘ _ 24.9.0». It. eltet It". , , _ :.e.tn i ll WATER QUALITY on Pette Pu Million: unknown L _ _ lton (Fe) ___— Chlaidel (CH l i kindness— : - | 12 we LL HEAD COuPLE‘I’ION: D In an...“ 9.. ' a Pstleu Adeetet D '2" Abeve Gtede J 13 cnourmc‘ I Hetetmlt D Neat Cement D ,3 Depth: From—It. OB“. ll A SANITARY Neeteet Source el 'euible enhainetien _mleet “indium?!” Neil diein'ected ween completion 8 Yes D Ne l e) U‘ PUMP. /UONE EV 23 J 3? /UC. Menu‘eetwet'e III-- Medel “ ‘ HP Length of Doe, '0'. it. coped" G.P.M. Type: D Suheteibk D Jet D Reeizrecetinl . J 15 Ree-uh, elevetnon, new“ e0 dete. etc. . Mt. .ih‘, HUI ltU . ' UK . . '- H': 1 :4 468 0670 1000 6“ l7 urea 'E LL counacron's cennncnlou This well we. dttIled endet any ietledlctlen end tMe teeett to true te in but el lay knew-ledge end belief. LLJLLJLJLI '1 I”I'LI"'H”"[ I 1': meme»! DEPAUMENT ht / or PUBLIC HEALYN 47-3123. I I I I I -.._-—-.—. —. _---——. —-—... IJEOLOGICAL SURVEY SAMPLE Nu. 2"] «3;; WATER WELL RECORD 143 1.0" [IICDD l. _l .-LLJ Ll] LLLJ MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT ACT 29‘ 9A 1965 1 LOCATION 0: WELL I PUBLIC HEALTH Eel-tn — '—- ' _ - h lawnshlv NM“ Fact-on Seutuon Nuntbct Town Mun-bet Flange Nutter \ . - ' shag_ _-_ _Lfieridiap Was L- 9.30 'v. - 20 1» wc‘ 1 gm. 0. .sgangc And :mthton -tv0m Row Intueccttone 3 ovmsa 0F Vu‘ELIm J 21.6' east or flerron Rd. A“ 1.561%,31'1‘8023 " north-of Mt 50 Ave. "" 1 °" ' 55° ' p0 Okemos, Ifiich. 1.3861. SlreLl odsmss '- cum 0' We” __Lucat-uf- ___-___ ___ ”___ -13fié-ETI‘IT'Vr-nn l M be'ov SnetL'. tn m. 4 WELL DEPTH. Icon-went” Date 0' CofltKalCllJ" I T I .\ 7 123 TI. 5/6/73 , ... ..: -- -:_ __:._ _‘ x, r .I" 5 D Ceble tool 8 flotety l3 Onven '3 Dog | | I H“ b. $ .’ I" . ' D Hollow ted D Jetted ID Ioted ID w I " 1— " " "‘I ' ‘1'” ":- ’ " T \' 7 ”5° 6 U5" BOON-cute D Pubhc Supe'v D tnduetty I | | 4 I A. . Dime-tion D Ait Conditioning 0 Comma! r-a--T-—.-- .,.. j ,..--- . 9': | ' -' _.,- T f , Dust Welt D I I 4 L 7 CAS'NGI TNeedchl wow-cf] Hetohl; AMVW e Dtem. IL._' “'5‘ ___.- ‘ ’ 50"“. —1____— 't. 7 'c :53 6:97 to 2 . FORMATION H 3: some?» c: L“ '° “52'“ 0”“ Iw'm'" I?" ’" stanw STiAYLu m. to tt. Death LID-we Shoc- hum M: D 8 $0.20.: brown clay 3 3 ___. ___—___- ___—___--._-..-._ - TVD’. 0th.: __ l rel C11? 8 11 51;: UL“: __ Length L __ Set cannon tt. end tt. bratm clay C: grew/:1 2 13 """‘°" -__”"”_-—.-—w J ‘.” 9 SYAYIC wuss: LEVEL sand 2 T 5 21. ‘ _ _ _ tt. below lend eutIace ' IO PU'.'PI‘oG LEVEL below tend euttece . . w .3 1V {z raves). T 28 £18” C " ' S 3 E h. ettet_1tm. euwine , 3-2 9.9.1“. gray eldy 7 35 It. eItet_ Me. Dmma __ o.o.m. , II wares: oueutv m Peru '0! Mnlloon; ra ' clav c2: rwcl (- 8 l ' a c. ' 3’ Iron (Fe) __Cnlondce ICII 8 stay clay 9 I. ' Hevdnese ___—Other 12 WELL «no common: A p whit-.- & black shale 1 1.9 U "' °°'°"" " [3 rule" Adeptev DJ!" Above Grade - ‘3 \‘Jl-H G'outed’ Ives B No 01-63: CL)" 10 y L O '." d 5 D Nee: Cement mnentomte 0 .""~“ Depth: ham tt. to tt. m5 1 _- a ‘ O , ___— 8‘ A), c'""y 8: gravel 3 Ky ‘4 Ne rest Soutce ot poeeibte conteménetion 60 teen 3 Duection Mt... . hale sands one 6 _' White 6 a t 5 7 We" undetected won cometetuon Gus D No 15 Puma; sandstone 72 [EONdot :i'tetaltedt Weaver's Nit; 9 ___—5% VI DB 23___O___ white shale £2: eandetcae 9 81 now Number I» elte __ Lenctn at One Pipe-1L h. ceoecitleGJx. sandstone 39 120 type: [a Smtetble U M D lectuecetmg III A 3.0 I!!!" t' IIIOCD z "mm-st. ' 'M'Vf’flat" 39’0 16 Rewrite. elevation. scarce of data. etc. AULLU Ita‘, fl '.“”. . . I...~ e '0. 057d ‘WM IIW. 17-63! 17 WATER WELL CONTRACTOR'S CERTIFICATION; Tnie welt wee tltilIed under me luteflctien end we curt te Ice te the best et My undone end tenet. eh... --T-L‘.: VICAL SL'PVEV SAP'PLE N: L e- u ' i 1. _ o= 1 27 —.._.. ——.- [__..--.___..] WATER WELL RECORD ACT 294 144 PA I965 [‘.LJ mcmcm osnnmrm 0; PUBLIC HEALTH 1.9. t l .Ier Cdien P I I: J ,D t' 9" o A o D- "echo-w lion Rood Inteuechonl J::_:MM- . . HALL" Range _.-/.-£:'1-. Town 4/ my, Section No, 20 All . . 3 own or wELL l3/4 ..119 Elm; ti: cf [.3. 16 Em” M J Clarence Bolt lE/IO .'.116 East of Qagadcrn 1513 Silver Terr cédd'm 1829 vastly Elace L5,,.,o.d¢..,:& c.., on“: Low” 1:. Les-151:1; :11-3? fear: Lac sing. Liabigaa I ' “”0“! 55 9'5"" 7° 4 WE LL DEPTH. com Ieted Dete eIC tn leti g . Pow-wow '.°::.°;3.:<* 215 ‘ 2.. ’ 7-22.139 °" T—“_ - _—--_“ —‘___—-— - 1‘ ---\ l 5 Cl Cable tool E1 Rotety Cl Dune DDug Ll-Z--——--—--—'— 65 6L‘ [3 Hollow ted D Jetted U Bend D _ T" 6 USE :3 Domestic [:1 Public Supply D Industry L.;.;3Le 19 84 D Ittigetion D Ait Conditioning 0 Connetciel D Teet Well D 7* 8 92 7 Shiv“; Thteeded [8 Welded 0 {Height Above/Xe‘g‘u’Y‘l i _ F . in. to a". Depth :euttece______1 9t. l” " ‘ in. t’ C“) 152 :WeighLles/lt. ' . in. to __It. Dflth [D’IWC Sh:e?Ye:QNor_-j 1.1-3.213? ’~ 3.~<31 1“ 27 ‘32 BSCREEN; i 1",, Lane 0;, . ‘ ‘_ 1'.’ f.‘ | Vii :15 IT—‘— ‘ —_ ------- ' -_—--_> ___-4 Slot/Gauze Lee;th_________ L Set between tt. ond___lt. Fittin;e: STATIC WATER LEVEL R9 It. below land sutlece IO PUMPING LEVEL belov- lend tutlece It. eltet Ive pumping_.____;__...p.tn. dot Facuircfl It. eltet lite. pumping—___} p. n. --1 WATER QUALITY tn Potts Pet Million' lten (Fe).— Chletidee (Cll Not Requir- Hetdnee wE LL HEAD COMPLETION; [3 In ’.”...“ Pat [3 Pitleu Adeptet D I?" Above Grade GROUTING: Well Gtouted? [:1 Yet [3 Ne Metetiel: D Neat Cement fl 1‘;-1;-";;;_‘1__t :- Depth: Fun-___”. te_Tt. 14 SANITARY: Neeteet Source 0' possible contamination JS—leet SSE—DinctietI—WType Well dlelnlected upon eetnpletien 1] Yet No 15 O OZ. PUMP: Henulectutet‘e Nettie—Ending 3‘12 t Model.” L - 9R9. ' Hp 3/1. Length el Dtep Pipefl_h. eepeeltyjflgicfifi: Type: Sveneteible 0 Jet D Reciprocating Rematlu, elevetien. eevtce el dete. ete. ..2 ‘ “h"? EL 8' L 17 WATER WE Addtee Thle well eree drilled vndet ny ietledletlen end Itie tepett Ie true te the beet e! I, Lee-ledge end Lellel. ' Sim-a4. .’.';-‘.. $1.421- ”’ LL CONTRACTOR'S CERTIFICATION; ' g p .0 IT '.‘O Cull-IS. I‘UI mam. ELDWj -’._-Z_[_-1__) DeteCLL'.__ ’. -.(1' .Cl_ ...—.-.--.— r