cmj'rwum mm wmwwm m A 9:53:46; swam: ma QWESWMTEQM mm THE mmucm AND emanmixnclmm 03: THE 1mg DEAN IMAGE m aazaocmmmi AMERKA ‘ Thesés far the; Dgg‘ree cf? Ph. D. .mmmsm STATE UNWERSATY ‘ Reba? Wayne “E'ysfi. ' 13365 ‘ \\§\\\\\\\\\\\\\T\\\\\\‘.\\‘~1T®§M\§\\§\LT x, This is to certify that the thesis entitled CONTINUITY AND EVOLUTION IN A PUBLIC SYMBOL: AN INVESTIGATION INTO THF‘ CREATION A? CCMI’YUNICATION OF THE JAI-TES DEAN IICAGE IN MID-CENTURY AMERICA presented by ROBERT wine TYSL has been accepted towards fulfillment of the requirements for Ph. D. degree in SEGGCh . “AIL/tit Z /(” I Major professor Date July 30, 1965 0-169 I'VE ,anflzg: MSU RETURNING MATERIALSI Place in book drop to remove this checkout from LIBRARIES m your record. FINES wiH be charged if book is returned after the date -, stamped beiow. ( 100 A 16 2 ' at 2:! \JU 20* ' X X H 10 2 I . .fi . A. $3.31 I, c’ I. Cl: ABSTRACT UMWINUITY AND EVOLUTION IN A PUBLIC SYMBOL: AN INVESTIGATION INTO THE CREATION AND (XWMUNICATION OF THE JAMES DEAN IMAGE IN MID-CENTURY AMERICA by Robert Wayne Tysl With the growth of mass communications a series of "Mnoes“tms been fed to the public. Various ”personalities," realandzfixmional, have been said to capture the public famnzas figures to be emulated and/or held in high esteem Mmdmjngcx1adoration. Most prominent among the modern gmpuku'heroes has been the Hollywood "star." Few stars in mmentymmrs have attained the popularity of James Dean. municzxection to Dean reached beyond national borders and marmaiage limitations, despite the fact that Dean had sfimraiin only one major film before his death in 1955. This investigation is a study of the forces involved inesUfiflishing James Dean as a symbolic heroic figure in our dyihzatuniand culture. Critical analysis of Dean's film mfles,gmrsonal interviews with Dean's family and co—workers, (mtau1analyses of “official" and unofficial publicity (EmmNgns~—all contribute to this historical overview of the:hmeraction of personality, talent, and publicity, as Robert Wayne Tysl nweahxlto the public via the mass media, projecting an emfluthiof the image from celebrity to public symbol. The construction of a viable set of personality traits mfl.mmnmxisms,reinforced through linkage with the public megecfi Marlon Brando, established the James Dean image. 'nus:MEge was maintained and further reinforced in film mflesanfl.in presentations in other mass media channels, mmtly:fin commercial reasons, achieving through various hnkmfim and repetitions enough popularity to enable it to be demnjled, however inaccurately, as an adolescent symbol of raEIIRXIagainst conventional authority, adding yet another dhmmshxito its appeal. The overall image, including gmblhzrecognition of Dean as a person, as an actor, and asaapubkuzsymbol, has retained a viable appeal to the gmemam day, and, until the rise of another public figure nub mungh unique appeal to supplant it, the Dean image will sunnve as the archetypal “young rebel” of our times. Such presentation of the celebrity as ”hero" suggests {mssflfle cultural implications as well as concurrent and rendtmu:re3ponsibilities of those in control of the mass media. CONTINUITY AND EVOLUTION IN A PUBLIC SYMBOL: AN INVESTIGATION INTO THE CREATION AND COMMUNICATION OF THE JAMES DEAN IMAGE IN MID-CENTURY AMERICA BY Robert Wayne Tysl A THESIS Submitted to Michigan State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Department of Speech 1965 Copyright by ROBERT WAYNE TYSL 1966 PREFACE When I left the campus of Michigan State to resume teaching and initiate my research, I little expected what lay ahead. I never considered my dissertation subject nor the expected research to be easy, but I had no idea how difficult it would prove to be. How difficult it was has taken me almost seven years to prove to myself. I had counted on the recency of Dean's career to be a decided asset in terms of the collection of material. Such was not the case. Certain aspects of Dean's personal life prompted those who did know him to disclaim knowledge. Because he was a “star, " there were many ready to claim knowl- edge for publicity's sake--others who admitted knowledge but withheld it in the hope of locating some more lucrative market. The inside story of how one becomes a star and how that star becomes a money-maker for his studio is not always a particu- larly wholesome story. It is, in fact, unprintable. The motion picture industry goes to great lengths to Protect its properties from invasion from the outside. "Academic co—operation" is a meaningless term to a money- making industry trying to keep its financial head above water and willing to go to almost any lengths to protect the status ({110. No scripts were made available to me, no interviews of ii any consequence were granted; letters were ignored, and personal presentation brought only a coldly formal tour of the "publicity files": a thick but useless collection of un- dated, underlined blurbs in Hollywood columns. "Academic co-operation” means even less to anyone peripherally connected to the motion picture industry as a means of livelihood. To protect himself, he must protect Hollywood. Again, letters were ignored, promises were made and broken, appointments were made and broken. In the case of a New York agent, after a month of being put on and off the engagement calendar I received the comment: "I was hoping you'd get disappointed and leave." Not only was I unable to CJet: c0pies of Dean's scripts, I couldn‘t even get a record of his professional appearances. Public and university library collections, locally and in California ,- provedto be equally useless, and the James Dean Foundation with its glorious sounding Museum and Library proved to be a group of enterpris- ing Fairmount merchants with a handful of racing trophies and an eye to the Indiana tourist trade. Considering that there is no reference file or list Of any sort available, I believe I have collected as complete a dossier of material about Dean during his lifetime and afterward as is humanly possible. This often meant a page by page coverage of years of foreign and domestic newspapers and Periodicals; it meant painstaking perusal of probable and possible sources of mention or even leads. It meant iii consulting societal studies, psychological studies, novels, pmetry, and criticism. It meant bagging, borrowing, and stealing whole collections of material from Dean fans, and then tracking down the sources: books, magazines, phonograph records, and pictures. I taped TV soundtracks for study, asked permission to set up a tape recorder in local theatres, and if that didn't work, sneaked in a miniature portable transistor recorder, bought for the purpose, and used that. kw intention throughout has been to chronicle what happened and in the process to preserve material which by its ephemeral nature would be unavailable to future scholars. I was once informed that a dissertation and its prep— aration were part of the continuing education of the doctoral candidate in his selected field. I feel I've learned a great deal. .As far as the James Dean image is concerned, Hollywood gapes in astonished innocence, Dean's father waits for Gerold Frank to write the definitive biography, and Grandmother Dean Sits in glory amid her twenty—one portraits. To those who helped with interviews, translations, and nwral support, my thanks. And a special word of thanks to Professors Weld and Lewis who "kept the faith." Robert W. Tysl iv TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER Page PREFACE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ii I. INTRODUCTION. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 II. THE BEGINNING: STAGE AND TELEVISION—-THE CELEBRITY: A REPUTATION IS FORMED . . 26 III. l955--A NEW BEGINNING: EAST OF EDEN AND REBEL WITHOUT A CAUSE: AND AN END-- OF SORTS . . .. . . . . . . . .. . . . . 51 IV. l956--RESURRECTION AS AN IMAGE: GIANT. . . 158 V. 1957--APOTHEOSIS OF THE IMAGE-—A ”SYMBOL" IS SHAPED: THE JAMES DEAN STORY . . . 520 VI. 1958--THE "SYMBOL" AS BEAT: ADOPTION AND ADAPTATION--FACT AND FICTION . . . . . 422 VII. l959--ANALYSIS: THE TASTE MAKERS TAKE OVER WHERE THE IMAGE MAKERS LEAVE OFF . o . 476 VIII. l960--SOME REVELATIONS AND MORE ANALYSIS. . 499 IX. 1961--FURTHER ATTEMPTS AT REVIVAL--TELE- VISION TAKES OVER. . . . . . . . . . . 521 X. 1962--TELEVISION AND THE BIG PUSH--AND A BIGGER FALL. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 540 XI. 1963--HISTORY AND BIOGRAPHY——AFTER THE FALL: DEAN AND MONROE . . . . . . . . 575 XII. 1964-—HISTORY AND BIOGRAPHY REVISITED-- "JAMES DEANS I HAVE KNOWN...". . . . . 603 XIII. 1965—-THE END--AND A BEGINNING OF SORTS . . 623 XIV. CONJECTURE AND CONCLUSION—-A NEW BEGINNING. 640 SELECTED BIBLIOGRAPHY . . . . . . . . . . . 666 CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION Most general public information about Hollywood and its stars is as illusory as the definitions offered. The Ikfllywood star has been equated with the gods,1 has been en- ckmmd with the qualities "of magic, of holiness."2 The star tas been almost universally considered as a freak of circum— smance and "the breaks,"3 the product of "a sudden excitement, a sense of recognition, and then a feeling akin to love."4 The sudden and immediate recognition of star quality on the Inut of the public may well be part of the insulated myth Ikfllywood has created and fostered as a protective camouflage. The motion picture industry as a business has protected itself fimethe public and from all outsiders by a careful and rigid tmt invisible censorship procedure. With the breakdown of the Hollywood studio system, (May recently have more cogent'and perhaps more reliable anal-YSes of stardom come to light. The veils of mystery have hleen partially ripped away. As Bill Davidson put it: . the creation of a movie star often is an artificial Process, not unlike the manufacture of Cheddar cheese. If the proper ingredients and machinery are used, you have--after the elapsing of a certain period of time-~an excellent cheese or a good movie star. Coukiit be that being a star meant less "some internal flair, some catalytic capacity to evoke excitement and response"6 thmiit meant some external manipulation of the totality of the star's public exposure, his image? Davidson's rather mmwrto—earth imagery concerning star-building coincides with iflistair Cooke's revelation of some years ago, disguised as part of an historical study, that "the routine has been so often rehearsed, it is a wonder any boy or girl worked on by a studio doesrmm automatically become a star."7 To better understand the nature of stardom, it is the intention of this paper to examine the career of a particular smar, James Dean, to note the formation of the Dean image, vmat was employed and how it was used, the ingredients, the machinery, and the timing. The reasons for using the Dean image are several. He was, first of all, what Edgar Morin called "the perfect star,”8 exhibiting all of the traits Morin and most other Mmiters associated with star quality. Moreover, Dean was dead; he was dead, in fact, before he became a star. Indeed, the fact of his death may have triggered the spark of greater PUbkkzrecognition. In any case, the situation of the Dean iflmge was such that no "real life" tampering with the image Cfllthe part of the star could unseat him or sway his follow- hKL Dean's personal contributions to his image ended with Ins death, creating what could almost be called a laboratory sfituation. Only manipulation of that image could raise him to star stature; such is the process this paper is interested in. Zicritical biography is not the focus of attention. The flxnmsremains the image, which is not necessarily related to 'Truth." Truth would be, in any case, of little relevance lune, insofar as the image is concerned, except as it enters asgxut of the raw material of the image and the image makers. bkme important than truth in the building of an image is the constant reiteration of a selected set of personality character— istics or related illustrative anecdotes which form a compre— tensible, cohesive, and coherent public image, at once recog— rnzable in film roles and augmenting publicity material, a tnocess hardly magical, but a manipulation of public imagery in time--for a time. James Dean, man and image, was a creature of his time. Pan and image had an historical reality, and any overview nmst construct some sort of historical perspective. Eric F. Jehnson characterized the middle Fifties as a "kind of auto- meted 1920's with weak White House leadership, a foreign gmlicy drifting from platitude to platitude, a domestic policy that avoided the basic problems of the 1950's."9 Richard H. Revere saw a “general weakness of conviction on most things throughout the country. . . . The great sin of the early 1950's, the great difficulty, was that nothing could be discussed on its merits.“10 McCarthyism and the exhaustion of the Democrats had created a sort of intellectual void on the national scene. John Emmet Hughes saw "temperance, modera- tion . . . and restraint . . . a conviction to do nothing."11 Basking in the luxuries of increased leisure and a high national economy, yet still shaking from the fears of the Korean conflict, the nation sat back to watch without reflection the passage of "the placid decade."12 On the day of the Big Four Geneva Meeting millions of Americans watched the opening of Disneyland on television. The moral tone of "that strange period"13 called the Fifties was described by John Clellon Holmes as lying "some~ “mere between Ike's reassuring grin and McCarthy's wolfish mMJe."l4 There was more time to enjoy, less time to think. Eflmer Davis saw "fear of intelligence, fear of thinking, fear to trust your own opinions in the give and take of dis_ cussions."ls Popular literature alternately decried the younger 6 or called gmmeration as riddled with juvenile delinquency,l it "silent,”l7 "apathetic, laconic,”l8 with "no great loves, no profound hates, and pitifully few enthusiasms."19 The scholarly research studies would seem to bear out the popular conclusions. Riesman, Glazer, and Denney's The Lonely Crowd saw a creeping "other-directed—ness,"2O and the Purdue Opinion Polls Study of Youth found that "every study of teenagers' attitudes finds them to be a reflection——sometimes distorted lnm more often accurate-—of adult thinking and behavior."21 The family worried about its youngsters: the young- smers worried about themselves. With more money and fewer responsibilities, the youngsters often had more money to Spend on purely leisure pursuits than had their parents.22 Adolescent entertainment was to become an important part of the national economy. Young people were a part of the affluent society. Certainly a good portion of the adolescent entertain» bent dollar went to the film industry, but the film industry was not wholly convinced it had lost its greater mass audience. The Fifties was a very difficult period for Hollywood. Theater receipts had declined since 1947 and continued to drop through 1953.23 Television and other forms of recreation were stealing Hollywood's mass audience. Fewer and costlier pic- tures employing fewer people seemed the immediate answer to a panic that arose as sharply and as quickly as did television. It was a time for taking chances. It was a time for not taking chances. It was a time of deSperation. The Fifties was the era of the filming of the "best sellers," works which had been "proved" in the bookstores, on the stage, on tele- vision. Young newcomers, actors, writers, directors, and producers, were imported from Broadway and from television. In the area of acting, especially, the studios feverishly be- gan to re-build stables of talent to work with and, in time, to replace the established stars who "were growing too old to Pflay romantic leads to appeal to vast teen age audiences.”24 There was still some belief in the particular suit- ability of the film for the modern temper. One aesthetician commented: We live in a fragmented, motile environment, and in the motion picture the seemingly futile activity of daily American urban life acquires by reason of its decoction into meaningful rhythms and patterns of sound and image, excitement and acceptability. The modern temper, ex- asperated and energetic, yet passive under bombardment by accessories to nature, receives in this visual drama of multiplicity its most authentic revelation.25 The popular utilization of the anamorphic lens (Cinemascope), at first considered as feasible only for ”big" pictures with crowd scenes and spectacle, proved, in use, after competing with other varied emergent forms, to provide even greater elasticity and intimacy than the old narrow ratio.26 By its very physical and aesthetic nature Cinemascope elimi- nated the necessity of the many cuts previously used. The depth of focus released directors from the necessity of using establishing shots; dialogue need not be cross-cut. Cinema~ scope took film a step further from the montage aesthetic of the silent film, but it put a magnified emphasis upon what mes being shown. The film environment which supported the Dewiinmge had the combined qualities of theatrical concen- tration and the intimacy of the screen. The wide screen techniques allowed and, at times, demanded greater and longer concentration on the actor. With the new techniques of filming came new techniques of acting. Opposed to the "mainstream sound style" of the late Forties and early Fifties, which Specialized in the dead—pan faces of stars like Alan Ladd and Veronica Lake, came the Method: "The Method was a conscious, perhaps somewhat cerebral reaction against this lack of feeling, towards a deeper, more revealing and spontaneous self-awareness."27 Though he would have carped at the aesthetics of Cinema- scope and its lack of montage, the Russian theorist Pudovkin?"8 printed out, years ago, the particular suitability of an acting method employing Stanislavskian principles for the cinema. Pudovkin's emphasis on "living the role"29 pointed, too, to the very principle of the star system in films. Because the actor's roles would be a "subjugation and re-expression of the actor‘s own living individuality,"30 Pudovkin considered the theatrical sense of the actor's range as becoming altered: The variety of roles he can play in the cinema is dependent: either in the variety of characters he can play while preserving one and the same external appear- ance (Stroheim) or, alternatively, on his development of one and the same character throughout a variety of circumstances (Chaplin).31 James Dean's acting career was brief. His was a grow~ ing talent. He may not have been the first Method actor on the screen, but his acting style in combination with directorial Cinemascope techniques brought an enhancement to the qualities of each, and, in turn, added no little stature to the recog- Iution of Dean's acting talents and his claims to stardom. The film figure is not yet a star, though he may be als ready well along the road to stardomt Whether the actor in the fihnnmkes his journey to Hollywood from the stage or television, or rises through the ranks in Hollywood, the way toward star- 2 either dom has already been prepared by the press agents,3 those employed by the motion picture studios or personal representatives. Though a trend placing greater or equal emphasis on the story and/or the director has been on the rise in recent years, merchandizing a film by using the star's name as a selling point has been and still is a major part of the fkdlywood advertising procedure. If the picture is the actor's first, more likely than not publicity will be built around his activities and personality traits which can be most easily associated with his film role when the picture is finally re- leased. The image presented through publicity builds upon the fihninege. They become one. With the addition of more pub— licity and more films, the joint image can be nurtured and enriched. Both cultist and anthropologist agree on the importance of reinforcing publicity. Edgar Morin said: The interchange anddidentification of the two person- alities, that of the heroine of the film and the more Or less fabricated one of the actress, produce the star, who in return will determine the characters she is to incarnate.33 Hortense Powdermaker intimated the same thought when she said: Publicity, whether it is through the gossip columns in trade and daily papers, or in interviews and articles in fan and other magazines, concentrates on the person of the actor. . . . Type casting, in which the actors re- peatedly play similar roles, strengthens this tendency. The audience tends to identify the actor with the role and thinks it is seeing the man and not the actor.34 The kinds of publicity that can help build a star are varied. Exposure is the key and may consist of anything from photographs to full length biographies. Initial or intermediate stages may include nothing more than the star's zume among those attending a party or a premiere. When a picture is in production, or about to go into production, a representative from the studio publicity department is assigned to the unit. It is his job to sift through the often inconse— quential incidents connected with the actor's work or his life and to find those anecdotes or situations most newsworthy. These, in turn, are passed on, either personally or through a "planterfi‘to the Hollywood press and eventually, and hopefully, to the awaiting public. Not all Hollywood publicity is false. It is merely selective-~and, at times, exaggerated to make it not only acceptable but capable of being sold as a news item. The truth of the information presented may be in inverse proportion to the popularity of the star concerned. Once a star is accepted inrthe public, there is little difficulty in Spreading the information. Difficulty arises when the star—to—be is an un— known. ‘Where there is no demand for the information, it is up to the publicist to create the demand. The most direct source of Hollywood publicity campaigns is the press book or campaign book. The large (approximately 12 inches by 18 inches) sheets detail the “official" studio 10 publicity campaign dealing with a Specific picture. The press books illustrate the various publicity materials (advertisements, posters, stills, banners, etc.) that can be ordered by exhibit~ ors for display purposes in conjunction with the showing of the film. Copy for canned reviews, publicity Spots, and bio- graphical materials are also presented for local use in the exploitation of the picture and its stars. The press books are created by the studios and are printed for and distributed to the individual local exhibitors. The general public seldom sees the press books as a whole. What the public does see are the general distribution advertisements in the mass media and the selections made from the press books by the local exhibit— ors for local use. The press books do not include local publicists' bally- hoo, usually concentrated in the larger cities, for reviewers, cplumnists and/or the general public. Local big city pro— motional stunts may be as inventive and imaginative as the Mats and budgets of the studio publicity staffs allow. Some- times special agents or firms are hired for a specific bally project. Parades, stars' junkets from Hollywood, press junkets tolkfllywood, and press parties are typical ploys. An ex- penditure of "$30,000 to $40,000 for one film in a metropolitan area is not uncommon."35 More generalized information concerning the stars and their images is presented to the public through the Hollywood 11 press. The Hollywood press represents the syndicated column- ists and the writers regularly assigned by newspapers and umgazines, foreign and domestic. Ezra Goodman was rather scathing in his description of them as a group: The Hollywood press is unlike any journalistic group anywhere. It consists of approximately 500 working (?) press, including about 150 representatives of foreign publications and 50 photographers. . . . And this press aggregation is as bad as it is big. It is strictly a second—rate fourth estate subsisting-—with negligible exceptions--on press agent hand—outs of mostly trumped up tales, freeloading (another name for payola) and general incompetence.3 O O O O O O C O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 Hollywood may well be the one news beat where sheer ability and enterprise can fail to pay off. In Hollywood, it is not so much what you know as who you know, and not how hard and well you work, but what circulation you have and how kind you are in print to all concerned.37 Goodman found that internal and external pressures exerted to preserve the Hollywood image so great that "even the most elementary facts about movies rarely get into print."38 At the root of the entire situation was money. Goodman saw money as "the life blood of the community, and publicity-—or the lack of the right kind of publicity--goes right along with it .l139 Malcolm Boyd4O quoted exhibitor R. J. O'Donnell as reporting that stardom could be worth $200,000,000 to a studio, based on a screen life anticipation of ten years, with four or five pictures a year. Publicity investments could be con— sidered good investments if they paid off. And to pay off, there must be exposure; somewhere in that estimated 100,000 12 vmrds a day floating out of Hollywood from the corps, the name of the star must find its way—~once or several times.41 "Exposure, exposure, exposure. The more attention the better."42 A detractor of Clark Gable once analyzed the star's appeal: They took a big, handsome hunk of man . . . and they told everyone he was the King. They repeated this loud and long enough-~like Goebbels' Big Lie-~50 that everyone, including Gable, believed it.43 And the papers and magazines would accept the Big Lie. like other Hollywood products, Hollywood news is a commodity, a commodity to be sold and to be bought. The public did like to hear about its stars. It did like to hear about the images. Marlon Brando said once: It's all a fairy tale, of course . . . but many people have a peculiar need to have fairy tales repeated to them. They like to think of certain persons in terms of a particular identity, and they don't want them to play other roles in their mind or their fantasies-~they don't want much variance from the original character they endow you with.44 David Susskind's 1961 "Open End" television show cover- ing "Hollywood's Fourth Estate"45 featured a symposium involv- ing several of Hollywood's top writers. They all thought of themselves as "reporters." Mike Connolly, columnist in the trade papers, film magazines, and syndicated in 88 neWSpapers, said that the Hollywood actor had three lives, his personal life, his life on the screen, and his life in print. Joe Hyams, freelance writer and columnist for the New York Herald Tribune, Syndicated to 100 neWSpapers, told how the press agent, studio or personal, came to interviews to set the scene and to listen in, to "intermediate," making sure the information given 13 exploited "the things the person wants exploited." It was explained that the function of the press agent was "trying to either stop or get publicity for the client." It was at times names out of the paper, or neces— necessary to keep clients' sary to "create a different image." Hyams said that the stars that's were symbols: "What they represent on the screen how we cover them-—personal lives, that's another thing. . . . Connolly called a star "a ticket seller," We are doing a job." the star was someone who could "bring the people in." claiming ”the public has to He dis- claimed any ability to make stars, make the stars." Sidney Skolsky, fan magazine and newspaper columnist, said one of the jobs of the Hollywood press was to try to discover who were the stars and who were to be the stars, declaring that "something happens to a face or a person when they hit celluloid," there was a ”magic involved,” and "if you could pick out these people. The change in the Hollywood system had not much changed the publicity scheme of things. If anything, the solicitation of journalistic favors was "more intense." As Connolly stated it, "I'm very glad. I'm suspicious of people who don't want publicity. They need it." These writers and the others of the Hollywood press corps present their material to the public through a variety of media. Television and radio have played their part in selling Hollywood to the public. The newspaper wire services 14 send out regular dispatches concerning all manner of Hollywood trivia. Larger new5papers often carry a regularly syndicated Hellywood column. Magazines present more lengthy trivia; magazines can afford greater Space for elaboration and amalga- mation of the image-bearing information. Sometimes dressed up as news, the information may be presented in Time and Life. Such pretensions are not even necessary for magazines like Cosmopolitan or Redbook. Public interest and enthusiasm may be enough of a selling point. Probably the greatest single regularly published outlet for the Hollywood myth and the star image is the fan magazine. REX Knepper's study of the fan magazine in Sight and Sound46 said that although the fan magazines were devoted exclusively to personalities and productions of the film industry, they were Yet Bill Davidson said that "for "in no sense house organs." studio publicity departments have regarded the many years , ll 47 fan magazines as ex officio arms of their organizations. Though the fan magazines remained independent of fi- nancial control by the studios, the general housecleaning of 1934 forced them into a position where they paid the piper, but the studios called the tune. Since the magazines and their umiters existed primarily on handouts from the studio pub- Lnfity'departmentsfg‘they could not but agree when‘the studios demanded that "all fan magazine stories that have been arranged through the studios had to be cleared by the studio publicity .15 departments before publication."49 Studio censorship of the fan magazines was evidently something more than merely the C150 "broad" policy Knepper suggeste provided the studios "with an The magazines, in turn, outlet for publicity of a uniformly favorable character, some- thing which they cannot command from any other medium of that public information."51 It should be stated, however, motion picture advertising in other magazines and in neWSpapers has been known to command considerable reSpect for the medium and its stars. Why did fan magazines put up with such tamper— Mainly because the studio had to provide them with ing? And the business material or they would go out of business. was much too lucrative to lose. Knepper reported sales of "well over five million” copies a month for the leading fan magazines, with Modern Screen and Photoplay averaging well over a million each. Screenland, Silver Screen, Motion Picture and Movieland made up much of the rest of the total sales.52 A decade later Daniel Boorstin reported that one quarter of all magazine titles were in the fan-romance category, according to a Newsdealer survey, Vflth combined sales of 53 million copies a month, 400 million copies a year.53 Knepper rated fan magazine consumption at "three readers per copy," considering their popularity in beauty parlors, waiting rooms, etc., with "none of their circulation wasted" because "nobody but a movie fan" reads a fan magazine.54 16 Since a mainstay of the fan magazine is the gossip column, the column puffs and mentions of the up and coming young stars are interSpersed, at first, with photo layouts, showing the starlets on the beach, on a picnic, at a party, sightseeing. These layouts are furnished by the studio. "After there have been enough layouts and the kids begin to notice them, then finally a writer is assigned to the story."55 Knepper considered the readers "emotionally adolescent"56 and in recent years the readership has become completely so. The copy emphasis reflects the tastes of the readership with its concentration on physical attraction, sex appeal, and the personal lives of the stars. Readers are "but slightly con— cerned with the professional attainments of their idols; they vent to share the personal lives of their favorite screen figures . . . to enter into what they believe is the charmed world of naughty but nice Hollywood":57 The studios know this. They also know that it is the readers of the fan magazines who raise an actor from the ranks of average to the pinnacle of box office 'take,‘ since their abnormal enthusiasm blinds whatever critical faculties they might otherwise possess: they will need to see his every film not once but several times.58 The correlation of the star's life with a film is further enhanced by the large number of photographs and other illustrations in fan magazines. Portraits, stills, on- and off-the-set Shots are mingled with the simple easy-to-read COPY: which makes usually only one point and takes several thousand spice-packed words to do it. A research project Sponsored by the U. S. Office of Education once Spent 17 $1,200,000 to prove the readability of fan magazine materials.59 More recent years found the age of the readership decreasing, and the contents debased still further. The tin- seled success of Confidential and other such scandal magazines brought about a changeover in the mid-Fifties when the fan magazines, in order to recapture some of the readers lost to the juicier copy of the scandal magazines, resorted to using some of the Confidential tricks, using misleading headlines, putting even greater emphasis on self—indulgence and sex. Motivated by the dollar sign, the themes of fan magazines became more racy, but the stories themselves "consisted of the same treacle as before."60 Confidential, Rave, and other such scandal magazines did their share of debunking of the Hollywood star image, but scandalous information, per se, is not always injurious to the star image. Ezra Goodman cited several instances of collusion between the publishers and the studios where scandal magazine revelations were, in fact, directly inspired by studio-provided information.61 Probably the closest generic descendant of the fan magazine, which fulfills many of its functions but on a broader base, is the teen magazine. In recent years teen magazine publication has begun to assume a stratification not unlike that assigned to adult publications. There are the "glossy" SOphisticated fashion magazines like Seventeen, the 18 muddle class magazines, like Teen, comparable to the mass sellers, and the lower class magazines like Dig, and 16, It is notable that the magazines which feature an age as part of their title invariably serve and cater to an audience several years younger. None of the magazines in this category, obviously gauged to a uniquely Specialized audience, appeared on the national scene before 1956. Jesse Bernard's study of the teen magazines revealed that the group as a whole was concerned with "the major positive-—fun and popularity-~and negative——overweight or underweight and adolescent acne—- values of its readers."62 Bernard said, "How to be attractive in order to be popular in order to have fun is the major bur- den of their contents."63 Charles H. Brown's study found the basic format to be double barreled, with a confessional aSpect and a cultic aSpect: The confessional aSpect centers about relationships with the other sex and such personal problems as how to be attractive, how to overcome shyness, and, in general, how to be popular. The cultic aspect centers about young and handsome rock—and-roll musicians and movie and television players. The articles deal with the most intimate of matters, to such an extent as to constitute an almost morbid preoccupation.64 Brown's 1961 circulation figures showed combined sales h.65 Since the time of of almost a million copies a mont Brown's study the number of magazines and their circulation have grown considerably, but their format remains the same. Brown felt the magazines were "meeting a real need of young people” in that they offered "the reassurance of a kind not to be found elsewhere."66 19 The even more specialized publics of the trade papers and the "serious" film magazines constitute an extremely small Imxcentage of the movie public. Indeed, since the regular readers of the trade papers, Variety and The Hollywood Reporter, are almost by definition members of the entertainment industry, they can hardly be considered as part of the consumer public. The serious film magazines, foreign and domestic, are not typical of the greater consumer public either. Even the most pmpular magazines, Cahiers du Cinema, Sight and Sound, Films and Filming and Film Quarterly, rarely exceed a distribution of over 10,000 copies per issue.67 The majority of the serious film magazines are recent in origin and are generally not American publications, though their subject matter is pre- dominantly American films. Concentration is usually aesthetic and critical rather than biographical. With the atmosphere and the machinery of star building established, what remains is the basic ingredient: the indi- vidual. Though, as noted previously, truth has little reference in the study of imagery, some indication of "What was James Dean really like?" might serve to indicate from just what kind of source the publicists could draw material. To better serve the interests of ascertaining what was true, the following section of this study dealing with Dean's biographical information is derived from previously unpublished materials, through personal interview and observation. That even here 20 one is dealing with the variables of personal interest and distorted memory is a recognized limitation and should be re— garded as such by the reader. There follows an attempt at chronological reconstruc- tion of the Dean image. The available materials drawn from the mass media in no sense represent a complete compilation. Considering the fact that the greater majority of the materials mare derived from no known bibliographic sources, the listing is as complete as might be expected. More importantly, how- ever,ix1their totality, the materials chronologically reveal patterns and influences that allow a reconstruction of the image in time. In the reconstruction of the Dean image several general characteristics were noted and are suggested here as a guide to reading what follows. As already suggested, the image built is a generally cohesive, coherent amalgam of repeated personality characteristics, reinforced jointly through films and other mass media. Other repetitions which might be catalogued are the repetitions involved concerning a single source. A given poem about Dean, for instance, might receive initial publication in a periodical, then be reprinted in a collection of the author's works. It may be further reprinted in an anthology. Similarly, movies become television programs, hardcover books are serialized, condensed, or become paperbacks. The reasons for repetition may find their foundation, commercial or 21 otherwise, more in the aesthetic quality of the work or the Jxmmtation of the author, than in any intrinsic relationship ‘UJthe Dean image. Though the image may not be the cause of the repetition, the repetition has an effect on the image. Above and beyond the effects on the audience of repetition, per se, the degree and means of repetition may broaden the receiving audience. Another recurring characteristic in the evolution of the Dean image might be called "linkage": the linking of one ruma with another. A picture may be sold by linking its title tx>the name of its star. A rising star may be linked to an already established star. Daniel Boorstin has noted a "symbiotic" reinforcing relationship between celebrities,68 but a.study of the evolving Dean image will Show the importance of linkage in establishing celebrity. The concepts of linkage and repetition are basic means for long and continued public recognition of the star image. Linkage and repetition extend public recognition of the star image long after the immediate, viable causes of the insti~ tution of the image have been met. Following the reconstruction of the Dean image a final Chapter is devoted to a brief conjectural analysis of the effects of the Dean image. 22 To support the chronological approach employed in this paper, an arbitrary system of noting has been established. Chapter notes appear at the end of each chapter. Newspaper and magazine column items and books receive the usual page reference to Show where the indicated item appears. Magazine articles are, however, often extensively summarized and quoted. For the convenience of the reader, to forestall any long and repetitious listing, the Single page listing noted for magazine articles is the page on which the article begins. The notes then of themselves constitute a more graphic chronological mmmary of Dean material presented in the indicated period. Because of the nature of the material and its sources, some of the items are fragmentary. Correct placement regard~ ing location and date is conjectural. They have been so noted. (0(1) 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. . Bill Davidson, . Leo Rosten, . Alistair Cooke, "Douglas Fairbanks: CHAPTER I--NOTES Edgar Morin, The Stars, trans. Richard Howard (New York: Grove Press, Inc., 1960), p. 33. Maurice Zolotow on "Open End: The Actor's Syndrome" (Chicago TV, February 18, 1961). Hortense Powdermaker, Hollywood, The Dream Factory (New York: Grosset's Universal Library, 1950), p. 244. See also Thomas Lorber Harris, "The Building of POpular Images, Grace Kelly and Marilyn Monroe," Studies in Public Communication No. 1 (Summer, 1961) pp. 45-48. "Hollywood: The Great Stars" (Chicago TV, March 13, 1963). The Real and the Unreal (New York: Lancer Books, 1962), p. 56. "Hollywood Revisited," Helloy Hollywood, ed. Allen Rivkin and Laura Kerr (New York: Doubleday and Company, 1962). p. 506. The Making of a Screen Character" (New York: Museum of Modern Art, 1940), p. 6. . Morin, Op. cit., p. 133. "The Open Mind: The Eisenhower Years" (Chicago TV, April 28, 1965). Ibid. Joseph Satin (ed.), The 1950's: America's Placid Decade (Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company, 1960). John Clellon Holmes, "Farewell to a Bad Decade," Nugget, April, 1964, p. 41. Ibid. Elmer Davis, "Through a Perilous Night,“ The 1950's: America's Placid Decade, ed. Joseph Satin (Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company, 1960), p. 127. Benjamin Fine, 1,000,000 Delinguents (Cleveland: Publishing Company, 1955). "The Younger Generation," Time, November 5, 1951, p. 46. Harrison Smith, "Report on a Generation,” Saturdaijeview, December 1, 1951, p. 22. Ibid. David Riesman, Nathan Glazer and Reuel Denney, The Lonely growd: A Study of the Changing American Character lNew York: Anchor Doubleday and Company, Inc., 1953). H. H. Remmers and D. H. Radler, The American Teenager (New York: Charter Books; Bobbs-Merrill Company, Inc., 1962), p. 38. The World 23 24 Henry Holt and 22. Alan Levy, Operation Elvis (New York: Company, 1960), p. 112. 23. Murray Schumach, "Hollywood Today," New York Times, January 22, 1961, Sec. 2, p. 7. 24. Baldwin H. Ward (ed.), Year (New York: Simon and Schuster, Inc., 1955), p. 140. 25. Vernon Young, "The Witness Point: Definition of Film Art," New World Writing No. 4, 1955, p. 270. 26. See Charles Barr, “Cinemascope: Before and After," Film Quarterly, Vol. XVI, No. 4, Summer, 1963, pp. 4-26 for a discussion of this topic. 2L.Raymond Durgnat, "Getting Cimena on the Right Wavelength," Films and Filming, Vol. XI, No. 5 (February, 1965) p. 47. 28. V. I. Pudovkin, Film Technigue and Film Acting (New York: Grove Press, Inc., 1960), p. 334. 29. Ibid , p. 216. 30. Ibid., p. 242. 31. Ibid., p. 369. 32. Interview with Ted Ashton, press representative, Warner Brothers Studio, July 15, 1959. 33. Morin, op. cit., p. 58. 34. Powdermaker, op. cit., p. 207. 35. Sam Lesner, "What Sells a Film?" Chicago Daily News, "Panorama," July 25, 1964, p. 17. 36. Ezra Goodman, The Fifterear Decline and Fall of Hollywood (New York: Simon and Schuster, 1961), p. 18. 37. Ibid., p. 19. 38. Ibid., p. 42. 39. Ibid., p. 17. 40. Malcolm Boyd, Christ and CelebrityrGods (Greenwich, Connecticut: The Seabury Press, 1958), p. 8. 41. Daniel J. Boorstin, The Image or What Happened to the American Dream (New York: Atheneum, 1962), p. 160. 42. Hal Perlman, publicist quoted in Dick Christiansen's "Here's What Makes Movie a Smash Hit," Chicago Daily News, "Chicago Life," July 16, 1960, p. 14. 43. Davidson, op. cit., p. 85. 44. Joanne Stang, "Marlon Brando at 40," New York Times, November 29, 1964, Sec. 2, p. 11. 45. "Open End: Hollywood's Fourth Estate" (Chicago TV, February 26, 1961). 46. Max Knepper, "Hollywood's Barkers," Sight and Sound, XIX, No. 9, January 1951, p. 359. 47. Davidson, op. cit., p. 146. 48. Knepper, op. cit., p. 359. 49. Goodman, op. cit., p. 78. 50. Knepper, op. cit., p. 359. 51. Ibid. 52. Ibid. 53. Boorstin, 0p. cit., p. 160. See also Laurence J. Quirk, "Fan Mags: The Pros and Cons," Variety, January 9, 1963, p. 36. 25 54. Knepper, op. cit., p. 359. 55. Goodman, op. cit., p. 83. 56. Knepper, pp. cit., p. 360. 57. Ibid. 58 Ibid. 59.'lem Articles Easy; Others Baffle Teens," Chicago Sun- Times, February 21, 1962, p. 14. 60. Goodman, op. cit., p. 52. 61. Davidson, op. cit., p. 146. 62. Jesse Bernard, "Teen-Age Culture: An Overview," The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, Vol. 338 (November, 1961), p. 5. 63. Ibid. 64. Charles H. Brown, ”Self Portrait: The Teen-Type Magazine,’ The Annals of The American Academy of Political and Social Science, Vol. 338 (November, 1961), p. 15. 65. Ibid., p. 20. 66. Ibid., p. 21. 67. Andrew Sarris, “The Farthest Out Moviegoers,“ Saturdgyfi Review, December 26, 1964, p. 14. 68. Daniel J. Boorstin, op. cit., p. 65. CHAPTER II THE BEGINNING: STAGE AND TELEVISION--THE CELEBRITY: A REPUTATION IS FORMED James Dean was born in Indiana on February 8, 1931. Mbving to California with his parents as an infant, Dean re- turned to Indiana at the death of his mother when he was nine. He was raised by his aunt and uncle, Ortense and Marcus Winslow, cn1a farm near Fairmount, Indiana, where he stayed until he was eighteen years old. According to his aunt: He was a borned actor . . . from the littlest child, he'd tell us things, acting them out—-he'd mimic us. Why he could make a dog laugh! Funny! You never saw anyone so funny. Everybody talks about him being so serious. I never saw such a well-adjusted boy. He was the only boy grandchild . . . everybody made such a fuss over him. He started calling me 'Mom' right away. He loved sports: basketball and track. And the drums . . . why he‘d tap out on anything until we got him-m1 guess you'd call it—-a marching drum. He loved an audience. She said, "I never saw such a determined child." Aunt Ortense was active in the local W.C.T.U. Starting at an early age, he gave speeches in W.C.T.U. speech contests and won medals; silver. gold and bronze. Aunt Ortense continues: About his junior year he was going to try for the Pearl--you need four or five Speakers to have a contest. He was supposed to be in the track meet that same day. He wanted to be in the track meet. I made him go to 5Peak. He started out beautifully--and then he froze—- ComPletely. I'd never again force him into anything. 26 27 Dean seldom had to be forced. He enjoyed dramatics and was active with his high school drama group. According to a Fairmount local: "He took to acting like he took to slopping hogs--he, himself, directed everything he was in. Adeline Nall didn't have to do anything."2 But Adeline Nall, the drama coach, did see possibilities in Dean's Halloween high school performance as Frankenstein and coached him to win the National Forensics League state com— petition at Peru in April, 1949. His competition material was a horror monologue, "The Madman." He went on to Longmont, Colorado for the national competitions—but didn't make the grade. After graduation he went to California where he re— joined his father, a dental technician at the Veterans Adminis- tration hospital near Santa Monica. He did some work with a Santa Monica little theatre group, and a change from the local Santa Monica city college to U.C.L.A. brought new theatre Opportunities: he played Malcolm in the Theatre Department's production of Mgppgph. It was at this production that he was noticed by a young actor's agent, Isabelle Draesmer: "For me his sex appeal lay in his mouth and below—-the use of his body. He was Sharp--quick and sharp. But he didn't have the discipline nor the concentration to give his talent direction.“3 Working on these aspects of his now chosen career, Dean started to work with James Whitmore, a successful motion piéture aCtor. in a sort of West Coast Actors Studio Whitmore was con- ducting at the time. Whitmore said of the group: 28 These were boys and girls, mostly in their teens or possibly many in their early twenties . . . maybe Jimmy was twenty; I don't know exactly how old he was . . . who were getting no real, they felt, helpful, dynamic, or specific, really usably specific instruction in acting at U.C.L.A., so they came to me . . . how they arrived at me I now disremember completely. I undertook the thing completely selfishly to discover in myself, to reaffirm things that I had learned in New York in the Actors Studio and various other schools I had attended, and to see if they applied to young people and if they could be com- municated to young people. A great pianist, or a violinist, or a painter, you know, all of them have to go through certain——not have to. but should, daily--go through certain exercises to keep their muscles in trim . . . and the muscles in acting, of course, are the imagination and your senses and your emotional organism. We did the basic finger exercises, so called, of acting; imagination exercises, sensory exercises, to just heighten the acting equipment that a human being is provided with by God: the use of the senses, the use of the imagination. Yes, in a sensory way you do little daily tasks without the objects being there: you peel an apple without the apple being there or without a knife in your hand-—just using your imagination and your sensory equipment to make it be there. This is not usable on the stage, hardly ever, or in the work, but it just heightens the organism that you're using. The essential thing that came out of that group, aside from the specifics of the acting technique, the thing that I tried to impress on the young people that I taught, was to find out what it is you essentially want as an artist. That was the thing I kept telling them over and over again to find out, and, in connection with Dean, he was in a terribly confused state at that time, as most young men are——but Jimmy, I feel, was possibly more sensitive than many young men—~and whether it was that Jimmy was gifted, as very few human beings are, with the ability to find out essentially what his needs were at an early age, I cannot say, but at any rate, Jimmy took this advice very much to heart and mind and made it a part of him.4 Dean dropped out of school. He dated Beverly Wills, daughter of comedienne Joan Davis, and, somehow, managed to 98h a job at the C.B.S. parking lot, then privately managed. Funds were low, but he relished the independence. Working with him was Art Marshall, a young actor who had worked with Dean 29 in Macbeth at U.C.L.A.: Several boys worked there. We were all literally starving actors, ready and willing to take almost anything that came along. I was married and had my own problems. Jimmy asked me to come and fill in for him from time to time, and, in time, I was working as often as he. He would have appointments, saying, "From twelve to four . . .“ and then be gone all day--and, sometimes, for several days. It got so I never expected him to show up until I did see him. There were times when he didn't even have a place to sleep and slept in his car-~an old jalopy he used to love to barrel around in. He would drive the hell out of it. and how he loved it when he had a chance to drive a real car.5 Acting jobs came, but they were inconsequential: some radio shows, a television commercial, a stint in the movies. They attracted no real attention, professional or otherwise. When a good break came a bit, it went by unnoticed. More often he was just a face in the crowd——if he ever did get on camera. But the jobs brought money; money bought food. He existed. James Whitmore continues: Jimmy's goals were, it seems to me, oh, what ninety— five per cent of the young people's goals are: multi- tudinous, multifarious, and completely undefined in their own minds. And I think this is one reason why they uh . . . rebel . . . from a sense of formlessness in their lives and in our world. And Jimmy didn't know, really, what he wanted to do. He had great urgings in him as most young people do . . , that's why I did not separate him from the other young people at the time. I remember a coffee klatsch we had at one time when he came to see me and said, 'What shall I do?‘ and he asked me to see a television half hour he had done, and at that time Jimmy didn't know whether the idea was to become a motion picture star, ideally, or what really was the most desirable thing for him. And I had a very serious talk with Jimmy and told him that there were very important things a man or a woman can do in an artistic sense or in a domestic sense, or in any other way. And the important thing, and it's reiteration now, is to decide for oneself whabone needed out of life and, even though wrong, even though it would change, to make this decision early and then to have a go at it and damn the torpedoes, not to let 3O society dictate to you its own restrictions and inhibitions, which it is, you know, only too eager and happy to do. As I told Jimmy, go back and find out whether you're an actor first, and mature . . . and by mature I mean find out just what your powers are——by acting . . . and acting in the best sense of the word, which is on stage. The actor is given much more importance, real importance, on the stage, because he isn't surrounded by all the technical crutches that an actor has in motion pictures, or in tele- vision, for that matter. It's pure acting . . . that's where the actor is naked . . . on stage. In my opinion that's the way to find out. And to live with actors who regard their craft as a craft, not a racket, not as a way of earning money or fame or fortune or whatever. And I feel that New York was the place to find that out. New York seems to be the closest that an actor could get where acting is viewed as a craft or art. Jimmy was at that strange state that many people come to in their lives, where all it takes is a nudge to send you headlong in a direction. And, as I say, it was really no more than a two hour talk over coffee one day. It provided the nudge, and Jimmy never forgot it. As I say, I was not aware. It was just a nudge.6 The continual search for breaks had been wearing. Even the relationship with Beverly Wills brought important professional contacts. And there were other contacts, too. The "gay" crowd started treating him to supper. He laughed it off as a free meal ticket. "Later it was a question of marry- ing Joan Davis' daughter or going off to live with a studio director . . . ‘He said we could have twin beds' . . . In any case the next thing they were living together, and it was with this man he went to Chicago——and on to New York,"7 said his agent Isabelle Draesmer. Art Marshall said: The man had dark hair, glasses, was effeminate—-not obnoxiously so, but obviously so. At the parking lot we didn't know what the relationship was, but we worried about Jimmy. He took chances--any chance that might pay off. Even to directly calling the studios. Never got him much of anything--but the audacity! Then he left for Chicago and New York. We lost track of him.8 31 Isabelle Draesmer added, "My mother thought him an opportunist."9 Opportunistic? Oh, no! He was an instrument, using all of the things he could control-—what every actor Egg to do to quench the burning urge for self expression and creativity. He would put himself in the character whether it called for it or not. He had the courage to lay his soul bare. Deep down, he liked himself. He didn't necessarily accept himself, but he liked himself. He would sometimes appear to have disdain for himself because he didn't think others could like him. They would not see his worth and would put him down. Rather than risk a gesture of love, he'd strike out. Perhaps Jimmy would have been different if he had had a different background . . . a velvet suit . . . trips to Europe . . . but then he wouldn't have had the raw, ex- pressivity he was able to summon and command. He didn't stand straight on the mark and let it go at that-—he had the courage and the scruples to be himself, to Show his hurt and Shock.10 Christine White, a young actress, met Jimmy after he came to New York. The words above are hers. She knew him when things were, for him, as bad as anything he had encount— ered in Hollywood: cheap hotels, the 63rd Street Y.M.C.A.—— always money problems——and problems of identity. His Indiana family sent some money; his friend, minister James De Weerd, .1 sent money. A letterle to De Weerd during this period, characteristically signed "James Dean" (as if he were signing a check, belying the friendly conversational tone of the body of the letter), comments on these problems: We are impaled on a crock of conditioning. A fish that is in the water has no choice that he is. Genius would have it that he swam in sand. We are fish and we drown. We remain in one world and wonder. The fortunate are taught to ask why. No one can answer. . . . I must run in the opposite direction. . . . even if I don't know who I am. 32 Later, television and theatre work give Dean's talent some water to swim in. We get a picture of the young actor at work from Christine White:12 The first time I met Jimmy was at Louis Shurr's office. [theatrical agent——Jimmy was now managed by Jane Deacy, who worked through the Shurr office] I was sitting in there typing out a play I had written when in walked this little boy, all dressed up in a suit-~and glasses, great big glasses. 'Do you have an envelope for us?‘ he asked. He asked what she was typing, and when told it was a play, almost brazenly, he asked to read it. Page by page, as she typed, he read the play. It was a short two character skit Chris was preparing for an audition with director Bobby Lewis depicting a chance meeting between a boy and a girl, Sam and Clayton, alone on a beach at night, a mood piece four pages long. It was an excellent vehicle for the purpose for which it was written. He liked the script and asked Chris to coffee——to discuss her play: "We discussed my characters and their motivations, but his first interest was in what they were wearing. He wanted to visualize what would be taking place." Not long afterward Jimmy called Chris to announce that he had received an appointment for an audition for the Actors Studio. He wanted to use Chris's play for the audition. She refused: ”I am going to use it myself . . . I will not assist you in my own play." He asked her to audition for the Studio too, and when informed that such a practice was not allowed, said, "I'll call Lee Strasberg right away." And he 33 did, calling back to inform Chris that all that was needed was her confirmation. We worked on it and worked on it, on the roof, on the street, in the park--for a month and a half. There were changes and changes, working things out. At no time was it ever wrong, but it was invariably improved, touch after touch, until the big day arrived. I was talking with some friends after we arrived for the audition, and when I turned around, there he was, sitting on a radiator, staring-~mesmerized, 'I can't do it . . . I'm not ready yet!‘ It took all of Chris's persuasive powers and all of the cans of beer they were using for props to reassure Jimmy and restore his confidence. When their names were called, Jimmy's confidence was restored, but they were without props. Chris suggested they fake it, but was refused, and Jimmy dashed out to buy four more cans. They had lost their place, but when Jimmy returned, the nervousness was completely gone. "Physical energy is the answer," he said. When their turn came again, everything started off wrong. Jimmy couldn't find the center of the stage without his glasses. Chris's entrance called for her to jump over him. She had to play from the other side or she'd end up in the wings: I had to work out something new; it was something we'd never rehearsed. When he saw me, he straightened up. It was an electric moment . . . and then he worked his way over, picking up imaginary sand, letting it fall. and then catching it, snatching at it in the air, kick— ing it up with his toe. The five minute time bell never sounded. The scene lasted eight and a half minutes, and when it was over, It . , . Very nice," said Kazan, "very nice." 34 He never played the straight lines——always the over- He had a very painstaking and methodical way of tones. working a thing out . . . but it came out. Jimmy could analyze, but he could also execute. He could be tempera— He was more emotional than mental, but he was charming. intellectual, yet the two were strangly intertwined. There doesn‘t seem to be a middle road for the actor. He was a creature of extremes: depression one minute, wild gaiety the next. It is difficult to be childlike, a quality absolutely essential for an actor, retaining the wonder and innocence, without being childish. He could do things and be nasty--yet you couldn't help liking him. And perverse! He would always do what wasn't ex- pected: ‘Don't do the normal thing!‘ His way was Egg way; he was virtually undirectable because he felt he could do no wrong insofar as his art was concerned. the 'wrong' things were not completely wrong. You'd rather believe the character could do such a thing. Behind them all was always Jimmy. Even Hamlet: 'Hamlet hasn't been done yet until I_do him!‘ he'd say. Chris used Even When asked to clarify the last statement, herself as an example in what one may consider a form of the currently popular Method approach to a role, an approach, a method Dean probably used: Juliet does not exist in the flesh and blood unless she is played. Juliet does not exist until the actress gets a hold of her. She is a fictitious character, written down on paper. Juliet becomes me. I do not be- come Juliet, because I am me, born in this century. Juliet is another character conceived in ShakeSpeare's mind. He never knew me. She must become me because I am the one who is alive. That means, she jumps into my skin, so to speak, because I have to honestly be her with the equipment I have: the voice that I have, Juliet must she must use. Therefore, use; the gestures that I have, that makes her a true character in terms of the way I am playing her. If the conceptual approach to a character seems strange or unorthodox, the approach to the playing of a role is equally so, and much more involved. 35 How do you get yourself stimulated into a part so that it is in conjunction with your own feelings comfort- ably? When I look at a script, this is what I do: I just read it through, and draw no conclusions I just want to get an impression. An impression is very important because it doesn't deal with the intellect. It deals with the emotions: which is a reflex or a reaction to some- thing which usually comes in terms of simple things like 'like' and 'dislike.‘ Now my reaction might be, I either like the script or I do not like the script. Now I have to make an adjustment if I am assigned to do this script, or I may like it enough to do it, or what have you. I find a way to like the script and to like the character—-animosi— ties toward the script will come out surprisingly in your interpretation. I then try to fall in love with the character, and that takes a certain amount of stimulation Setting this attitude, which can be definitely worked for. I am also kind of emptying myself and preparing my— then, self to receive any kind of impressions I may have about the part. Then I read through the script again in terms of the character I am playing, and lift her out of those and find out what she alone is doing in the script. pages, I can then make out a list of the activities that she is actually doing in the script and in relation to other people. I then disregard those activities and I pay attention to what her stream of consciousness is in the . what she is thinking. Then I throw all this script . . away. I now pick for myself what you might say is the task. It takes about fifteen or twenty minutes for the task to really concretize itself in your mind. Now by the task, I mean that you say, ‘Play this scene as if you were going to catch a train.‘ Now, immediately, all kinds of be- havior things happen, because you have given yourself that image which has nothing whatever to do with the Script. It is merely an acting task which you have chosen to to get what you hOpe will add which isn't there in the so, stimulate you, personally, to the script. Maybe energy, but which you would like to put in the part, script, therefore, I give myself an image of catching a train. Now. if I don't really like that, or if I don‘t really I‘ll pick another one. think that is all there is to it. I may pick four, five, six, or seven . . . like I've got or whatever it is that I think might attach a headache, itself to this character. Then I forget about all of them and just simply play the scene, and you'd be sur— prised that all these things are there, because they have all been tuned in on. To be sure, preparation is an individual practice and there must be as many variations as there are players. 36 Geraldine Page, was asked about the she replied, "That's true But when another actress, conceptual basis of the approach, of every character and every actress."13 At the time she had not yet been cast as the Princess in the motion picture version of Tennessee Williams' Sweet Bird of Youth, a part she origi- nated on the stage. Mentioning some of the Hollywood actresses she said they would be "five being considered for the role, all fascinating and all valid.” She different Princesses, added: All the great roles, Chekhov's roles, Ibsen's roles, O‘Neill's roles, Tennessee's roles can all be played a number of different ways. They're all right, but they'll all be different. The different tasks each actress takes will appeal to different people. Theme? Really good authors are tapping all of life—— if they were better at explaining things than doing things, they wouldn‘t be poets, they‘d be critics. This process, then, of finding an approach to one's roles through one's own background and experience, one's own personality, if you will, was practiced by Dean at the Actors Studio. Describing the Actors Studio as a "high powered post- graduate course," Geraldine Page told of a typical Studio session: In the studio people attend the sessions-when they can; most of the people work a great deal. Every day there are two scenes done, usually two people. and Mr. Strasberg tries to get people to find out what they are doing and why, so that it isn‘t all just chance and accident. If they do good work once in a while, to find out what made it good-~50 that they can repeat it: ‘What did you do?‘ 'What did you mean by that?‘ 37 And he tries to develop the person's awareness of what results they got when they did it and what made it happen. The main thing he does is to explore the vast array of what you can do-—what all actors can do if they know how to do it--so that they are forced to examine what they just repeat because it was good once--imitate He continually makes you work back to some That‘s what that ‘mean, old man' themselves. ‘I don't want that—-I want you!‘ initial source . . . Strasberg insists on: Dean worked this way under Strasberg-—not often, nor for long, to be sure. One skitl4 Dean wrote himself for just such a session has "Jim" and "X" looking at a map, deciding This script, too, runs about for or against a trip to Europe. four pages and has many opportunities for action, allowing a play on Dean's actual short-sightedness. Dean evidently knew what he could and could not do, he knew his assets and defects. he preferred to play up his assets and play When possible, He evidently just didn't down, or make a play on, his defects. like having to hear about them. At one Actors Studio session he worked in a Skit in which he played the part of a matador (he loved the Sport; at one time he considered trying to become a matador) and Strasberg really "lit into him.”l“ The critique sessions were valuable and interesting, but from then on, the actual playing at the Studio could be left for others. He would save his work for public performance. James Dean‘s first critical notices on Broadway came from his performance of Wally Wilkins in N. Richard Nash‘s Play See the Jgguar, which opened at the Cort Theatre December 3, 1952 and closed in less than a week, a commercial 38 failure. Dean played the role of a weak—minded mountain boy whose mother kept him locked in the ice-house because she feared that men in the outside world would not treat him with justice nor kindness. An earlier Hartford tryout merited a "special accolade to James Dean in a tender touching role "16 as a simpleton. He plays the part beautifully. Evans Clinchy in the Hartford Times called his "an exquisite per— formance."l7 Broadway critics were not quite so warm toward Dean and even colder toward the play. The New York Times's Brooks Atkinson made no specific cast mentions, but contented himself with comments about the "tortured literary style and tangled craftsmanship" of the play, noting that it was "verbose" and said "nothing.“18 George Jean Nathan called it "symbolic delicatessen"19 Richard Watts in the Egg; agreed, but added, "James Dean achieves the feat of making the child- ish young boy believable and unembarrassing."20 And it was a feat: the part was a difficult one, though Dean was not without experience. The Cort Theatre program listed "The Lux Video Theatre,“ "The Web," "Martin Kane," "Studio One," "The Columbia Workship," and "SuSpense" as his television credits, and Has Anybody Seen My_Gal, Fixed Bayonets, and Sailor Beware as film credits. Some of the charm Dean brought to the role in Nash's mountain morality could be seen in the August, 1953 Theatre Arts21 publication of the text, illustrated with pictures of the Broadway cast. The curling toes of the 39 habitually shoeless farm boy demonstrate part of the bucolic charm Dean must have used on Lemuel Ayres who produced the show and got him the job. The closing of the Show threw Dean back on his tele- vision credits. The Sponsorship of Ayers and Dean‘s good reviews kept him working in television. He was becoming more and more successful in getting roles, and the roles kept getting better. Working his way up the scale from minor roles to supporting roles, by November of 1953 he had achieved his first starring role in a television drama: the lead in a "Kraft Theater" presentation “A Long Time Till Dawn,“ presented on November 11. In that same month, on November 17, he co- starred with Gene Lockhart on the "Armstrong Theater“ pro- duction "The Bells of Cockaigne." He also had a supporting role in the "Robert Montgomery Presents" production of "Harvest" starring Lillian Gish and Ed Begley on November 23. Subsequent Broadway credits came with Ruth and Augustus Goetz‘s The Immoralist based on Andre Gide's auto— biographical novel. The play opened on Broadway at the Royale Theatre on February 8, 1954 after a week of paid preview per— formances and a prolonged tryout period in Philadelphia. Dean played the blackmailing, homosexual Arab boy, Bachir. Certainly this role was the polar opposite of his previous Broadway effort. Even in a Broadway season graced with the 4O sexual candor of plays like Tea and Sympathy and Picnic, The Immoralist seemed somewhat shocking and blunt. Theatre Arts thought Dean "eSpecially good,“22 and Walter Kerr thought "23 well done, as Dean's "colorfully insinuating scapegrace did Brooks Atkinson.24 The playing of Bachir brought Dean the Daniel Blum Theatre World Award25——but Dean gave his quitting notice opening night. There were bigger things in the offing. The Royale Theatre program noted the considerable “critical attention"26 Dean received for his performance in See the Jaguar, repeating the motion picture and television credits earlier recorded. The first two decades of Dean‘s life were covered with a sentence apiece: "Born in Indiana, he began his career by winning the Indiana State Dramatic Contest and then went on to win the National. His pre-law studies at U.C.L.A. were interrupted by movie offers. . . .“ Geraldine Page was a member of the Actors Studio but she never met James Dean until they appeared together in The Immoralist; She was an established actress and a star-— he was a supporting player. She recalls his performance vividly: “He was supposed to be an Arab boy and, of course, he looks less like an Arab boy than anybody you could imagine with that face and the blond hair. But the way he behaved gave such an image . . . that had nothing to do with the way he looked on the surface."27 41 Even more vividly, she recalls their friendship and professional association. They became "good friends right away." The key to their relationship and, for her, the basis of his appeal to some people and not to others was: . . . a tremendous intensity and a curiosity about peOple, and a continuously alive mind—~always fascinated by everything around--so when you're in his company, every— thing took on such an added vividness. I saw things in a different light. I think it's very unusual. Most people would be frightened by this kind of intensity. It didn‘t frighten me—-I enjoyed it. But most people didn't quite know what to make of it; it made them uncomfortable because he was so alive—~continual examination of peOple and himself, a tremendous awe—inspiring kind of integrity and honesty which really upset people. He had the effect on people of making them look at themselves——and not like what they saw. A kind of unremitting pride in himself and self respect . . . made everybody who ever saw him remember every lie they ever told! He was a very uncomfortable person to be around unless you kind of welcomed that look at yourself that was propelled by his presence, because it gave you a chance to reassess yourself. It suffused everything he did, you see. His powers of concentration were enormous and his imagination was endless. When we were in the middle of the play and they started rewriting the third act so often, I got so confused I didn't know which end was up! We had thirty— two different third acts in thirty—two consecutive days—— and I was carrying on so! ‘Who pg this creature I'm supposed to play? Every night it's somebody new. I can't keep track of it all!‘ . . . and I‘d complain and carry on. He‘d say, 'Let me look at it,‘ and I‘d Show him the new rewrites, and he's sit down with it for a minute. 'Um hum!‘ he's say, 'why don't you . . . ‘ and he would come up with some idea that would be so intriguing to my imagination that I couldn‘t wait to get on the stage and try it. Like for instance the time they decided to change the scene when we come in from the desert. It's all a scene about how hot and dusty it's been. So, as I recall, I didn‘t notice that about that scene; it was he who brought it up. And he was walking around thinking about it and saying, 'Now what do you do when you're hot? Try to get cool! Now there'll be a wash stand and some water . . .' so while he was thinking this, he went like this . . . ‘You take a cool cloth and put it here on the insides of 42 and you put it here on the insides of your elbows, and you put it behind your neck.‘ Well, with that little bit of business to incorporate into it, the whole scene took on a kind of shape, and then all the dramatic values and all the content, the words, gathered around this Simple little thing. You know what the great sadness is? [Not only] That anybody so gifted Should die so young . . . but the fact that he was gone before he had a chance to direct. He would have been a phenomenal director, because of this specific kind of ability to excite your imagination with— out giving you anything that would bind you. your wrists, As a further illustration of Dean's artistic integrity which made a personal impression, Geraldine Page recalled the first time she ever saw Dean, and the event which followed that first impression: The first director we had was Herman Shumlin. I‘ll never forget the first reading of the play . I locked ever so around and everybody was on their good behavior, anxious to please. Then I saw somebody very remote and relaxed, slumped down, with his cap and the glasses, and the jacket up. You know, sort of hiding from everybody that way. You just naturally noticed him. . . . When we started reading the play, after each line that anybody would read, Mr. Shumlin would say, ‘No, no, no, no,‘ and give us a line reading, ‘Not tuh-dah, tuh—dah, tuh-dah, but tuh-dah, tuh-DAH, tuh—dah' and we all shuddered and sneaked looks of commiseration and, oh, we all tried very desperately to please him with line readings. We thought, ‘Oh, we're in for a dreadful time if it‘s going to be like this.‘ After hourS--we finally got through the first act. It was a painful process. Then came the second act that Jimmy was in. And he'd been sitting down in his chair, you know, all covered up, hiding——and he mumbled.his first line . . we could hardly hear him. Mr. Shumlin said, 'I beg your pardon. The first line, you should read it this way: Tuh-dum, tuh—DUM, tuh-dum.‘ And there was this long silence and Jimmy finally said, ‘Mr. Shumlin, why are you insulting my intelligence?‘ And we all were ready for the earth to open and volcanic flames to erupt. We thought,"who is this little boy with the small part talking to the great Herman Shumlin?"-—We all waited to see what Shumlin would do about that! And there was an equally long pause from Mr. Shumlin and then he finally said, 'I didn't intend to do that. How did I insult your intelligence?‘ 43 'Well, it's the first reading and you want me to read the line a certain way. I would like to have some time to get used to who the people are that I'm supposed to be talking to, and have a chance to decide some things about it first.‘ And we all thought, ‘Oh, really gonna get it now!‘ Mr. Shumlin said, ‘I'm very sorry.‘ And we could have died we were all so jealous and angry that we hadn't had the nerve to do the same thing. But that was so typical of his behavior all the time: A complete lack of fear! this is so pretentious-—he's The success Dean had with treatment of Mr. Shumlin and Shumlin‘s treatment of him was reflected in the construction of his role. He “flowered." Unfortunately, the same was not true of the rest of the cast, and, as has been noted, the script, I too, was having its difficulties. A new director was called in to save the cast and the play from disaster. The new director was not so understanding of Dean's personality as was Herman Shumlin. The relationship, and it was personal rather than professional, obvious and public, grew steadily worse as the play approached Broadway. On opening night Dean gave his two week notice. AS one member of the cast stated the problem, "He refused to ass-kiss!“ On March 6, 1954 The New York Times announced: James Dean who originated the role of the young Arab servant in the Broadway offering The Immoralist has been signed by Elia Kazan for the male lead in the forthcom- ing Warner Bros. version of John Steinbeck's novel East of Eden; The announcement was made yesterday by the local offices of Mr. Kazan, who will produce and direct the Cinemascope project through the film company.28 Kazan used his power in casting the picture. What was he looking for in his cast? 44 Some aptitude. Training is important. It must be good training—~voice and body movement, of course. Even more important are concentration, imagination, and fantasy. ‘ . . . But you may become too tame, too sweet. An actor has to have a sense of danger.29 . U C C O C O O O O O O O O I: O O O O 0 0 If they've got something——the shine and shiver of life, you could call it, a certain wildness, a genuineness--I grab them. That's precious. That's gold to me. I've always been crazy for life. AS a young kid I wanted to live as much of it as possible, and now I want to Show it—— the smell of it, the sound of it, the leap of it. ‘Poetic realism‘ I call it when I‘m in an egghead mood.30 Having built his fame as a stage director, Kazan had long been admired as an actor‘s director. The new filmic medium Cinemascope would seem to be especially adaptable to his particular forte: The principle seems to be to try to keep the camera on the actor as long as possible and only to cut when physical difficulties arise. If this technique never actually becomes dull, it is because Kazan fills his background with a mass of atmospheric detail which is in itself fascinating to watch. As one might expect, he is at his best in passages of dialogue . . . through clever staging and minute direction of the actors.3 If Kazan could feel and express the power of a motion picture director (". . . A movie director can create. The camera is such a beautiful instrument. It paints with motion."),32 he also knew what he liked: There's the technical muck, the filters and light meters and cameras and spotlights. While all that matters is the actor. That little human thing you want to get at—— that little moisture in the girl's eye, the way she lifts her hand, or the funny kind of laugh She's got in her throat-—that's what matters.3 Acting in pictures is much more demanding than on the stage. The camera penetrates like a microsc0pe. ' O O O O 0 o 0 U 0 o o D o C o o o What forceps did Kazan use to manipulate the "little human things" under his microsc0pe? His simplified version is: 45 "You tell him [the actor] the basic problems he'll have to meet, the things he‘ll have to remember. After that you hope he gets his own ideas."35 Others, who have worked with him and under him can provide perhaps more penetrating information: Deborah Kerr: You see, Gadge [Kazan] made me realize that in some ways my role was literally me.36 Burl Ives: Improvisation . . . that‘s the boy's specialty. There was no reason to drag my father into it. The only way I can explain it is that Gadge must have read my autobiography where I kept writing about my father without knowing what I said. Anyway, he asks me, 'What would your father do?‘37 Or, as an anonymous actor said: There's nothing he doesn‘t exploit. That animal trainer! Uses their emotions like they were animals. He plays democracy with them like a trainer puts his head into the tiger‘s mouth-~for the good of the Show. It's all calculated. He lets them pat him on the back—- and each time they do, they're working for himf38 Kazan liked "young and hungry actors" because they "39 were "more suggestible, more trusting. Kazan's cast con- tained no big Hollywood names. His leading player was an unknown. The final script of East of Eden by Paul Osborn, dif— fering but slightly from the released film, was dated May 17, 1954.“:0 Cal, the role played by Dean, was described Simply as "about twenty, dark and intense." The picture was shot during the summer and early fall of 1954. To Hollywood, and to Hollywood's fans, Dean was a no- body. True, he had a starring role in a big production, but 46 by the Hollywood rule of thumb, "You're only as good as your last picture," Dean attracted little attention from the columnists. Ted Ashton, press representative for Warners on East of Eden had his problems. He said41 that Dean was too wrapped up in his work to care about public relations~-or even be convivial with the rest of the cast or crew—-except Kazan and Julie Harris. Even for Hedda Hopper, he was too busy. She was to blast him. His possibly erratic personal behavior went unnoticed, or, at least, received little public comment in a social group where behavior is more often erratic than not. To gain attention, the kind of attention that sold tickets at the box office, a gimmick was needed—- 111. an ”Linkage" was the obvious answer-—linking his name with some more established star: the device that worked so well for Rock Hudson at the beginning of his career when his name was constantly associated with that of Vera—Ellen. It‘s the kind of publicity device used in many fields. Politically, it's the basis of the straight party ticket. Its rationale permits Robert Kennedy to bring John-John, son of his murdered brother, on a senatorial campaign. Though still unknown to the movie public, James Dean was not forgotten by the New York theatre crowd. Maurice Zolotow reviewing "The Season On and Off Broadway" in general and the new musical Hayride specifically, mentioned in passing, "I have not seen such interesting sexual gyrations since 47 James Dean as the Arab bOy in The Immoralist attempted to work his wiles on Louis Jourdan."42 In Hollywood Dean solved the whole problem himself. He fell in love. The feeling seemed to be evidently mutual and not too long afterward the names of James Dean and Pier Angeli were linked in the gossip columns and the gravure sections as a going team. Linkage is good copy; romance is better. Hedda Hopper, initially uncharmed, noted that Dean, a "member of the Dirty Shirttail group of actors from New York," had to borrow a tuxedo to take Pier out.43 Pictures were taken of them visiting each other on the set, holding hands. "They were like children,"44 said Julie Harris. Pier would come to the Eden set; Jimmy would go to The Silver Chalice. They exchanged mementoes. It was not to last. While it did last, it gave Dean a perhaps larger audience for his starring roles on television. Dean starred in the "Philco Hour" production "Run Like a Thief" on September 5, 1954 and on the "Suspense": "Padlocks“ with Mildred Dunnock on November 9. That same month, on November 14, though Dean played the dramatic lead opposite Natalie Wood on the "G. E. Theater" production "I'm a Fool," advertis- ing in the New York Times45 concentrated publicity on the better known Eddie Albert, who did the narration. Pier Angeli‘s new boyfriend was only starting to be- come a somebody, and when the romance with Pier was officially 48 over with her marriage to another man, a new linkage had to be established. Romance is always good, but it is not necessarily the only route to public acceptance. OCOCD‘QOUU'IFPCNNH |._.& l— s H p; N 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. CHAPTER II--NOTES Interview with Mrs. Marcus Winslow, December 31, 1958. Interview with Mr. Louis Crist, December 20, 1958. Interview with Miss Isabelle Draesmer, July 27, 1959. . Taped interview with Mr. James Whitmore, August 14, 1959. Interview with Mr. Arthur Marshall, August 1, 1959. Interview with Mr. James Whitmore, August 14, 1959. Interview with Miss Isabelle Draesmer, July 27, 1959. Interview with Mr. Arthur Marshall, August 1, 1959. Interview with Miss Isabelle Draesmer, July 27, 1959. . Interviews with Miss Christine White throughout the summer of 1959. James Dean's letter to James De Weerd, date not noted; copy in possession of Mr. Stewart Stern. Interviews with Miss Christine White throughout the summer of 1959. Taped interview with Miss Geraldine Page, November 18, 1960. James Dean, untitled manuscript in possession of Miss Christine White. Interviews with Miss Christine White throughout the summer of 1959. Those portions of the interview concerning the Method were taped on August 27, 1959. "T.H.P.," Hartford review of See the Jaguar by N. Richard Nash, November 14, 1952._p. 21 [Fragment-—no source listed, private collection]. Evans Clinchy, review of See the Jaguar, by N. Richard Nash, Hartford Times, November 14, 1952, p. 34. Brooks Atkinson, review of See the Jaguar, by N. Richard Nash, New York Times, December 4, 1952, p. 46. George Jean Nathan, Review of See the Jaguar, by N. Richard Nash, quoted in "How Palpable Is a Hit," Theatre Arts, Vol. XXXVII, No. 8 (August, 1952), p. 33. Richard Watts, Review of See the Jagger, by N. Richard Nash, New York Post, December 4, 1952. Reprinted in New York Theatre Critics‘ Reviews, 1952, Vol. XIII No. 26, p. 164. Illustrated text of See the Jagger, by N. Richard Nash Theatre Arts, Vol. XXXVII, No. 8 (August, 1953), pp. 34—64. Review of The Immoralist by Ruth and Augustus Goetz, Theatre Arts, Vol. XXXVIII. No. 4 (April, 1954). p° 17. Walter Kerr, Review of The Immoralist by Ruth and Augustus Goetz, New York Herald Tribune, February 9, 1954. Reprinted in New York Theatre Critics' Reviews, 1954. Vol. XV, No. 21, p. 374. 49 24. 25. 26. 27. 28. 29. 0. Cr] 31. 32. 33. 34. 35. 36. 37. 38. 39. 40. 41. 42. 43. 44. 45. 50 Brooks Atkinson, Review of The Immoralist by Ruth and Augustus Goetz, New York Times, February 10, 1054, p. 38. Daniel Blum, Theatre World: Season 1953—1954 (New York: Greenberg, 1954) Vol. X, p. 186. Program, Royale Theatre, The Immoralist by Ruth and Augustus Goetz, p. 14. Taped interview with Miss Geraldine Page, November 18, 1960- "of Local Origin" New_York Times, March 6,'1954, p. 13. Barbara Schultz, "Elia Kazan Tells Drama Students: 'Stick with It‘" Chicago Tribune, October 11, 1961, pt. 3, p. 11. ' Frederick Morton, "Gadge," Esquire, Vol. XLVII, No. 2 (Whole No. 279)(February, 1957), p. 49. Karel Reisz, "Editing," Sight and Sound. Vol. 19, No. 8 (December, 1950), p. 335. ' Morton, op. cit., p. 123. Ibid., p. 122. Louis Marcorelles, Review of Baby Doll, Sight and Sound, Vol. XXVI, No. 3 (Winter, 1956), p. 150. Schultz, op. cit. Morton, op. cit., p. 127. Ibid., p. 121. Ibid. William Glover, "Theater for Writers, Films for Directors, Says Kazan," Chicago Tribune, July 8, 1960, p. 23. Copy in Drama Collection, New York City Public Library. Interview with Ted Ashton of Warner Brothers Publicity Department, July 9, 1959. Mr. Ashton was "unit man" for East of Eden and Giant. Maurice Zolotow, "The Season On and Off Broadway," Theatre Arts, Vol. XXXVIII, No. 11 (November, 1954), p. 87. Hedda Hopper, from Motion Picture, November 1954. Reprinted in The Real James Dean Stopy (New York: Fawcett, 1956). p. 22. Taped interview with Miss Julie Harris, April 3, 1959. Advertisement for "G. E. Theater," "I'm a Fool,“ New York Times, November 14, 1954, Sec. 2, p. 11. CHAPTER III 1955--A NEW BEGINNING: EAST OF EDEN AND REBEL WITHOUT A CAUSE; AND AN END—-OF SORTS Kazan, the director of East of Eden, gave the screen a new kind of hero when he presented Marlon Brando in A Streetcar Named Desire. His more recent On the Waterfront, a tour de force in naturalistic drama utilizing improvisational acting techniques, was a smashing success and highly touted in many areas for varied film awards. Brando, again Kazan's star, was a Shoo—in for the Academy Award. Warner Bros., under whose aegis both Kazan and Brando worked, was happy with the results of the work of both men—-but there were problems. Brando, who made his name as a young, off—beat, "rebel" type, unhand- some in the more typically Hollywood sense, underscoring erupting emotional violence with an almost childlike asexual tenderness, was in need of a change of image: he was no longer young. The type retained a valid appeal. Brando as the type did not. Brando was ready to be settled into the role of movie "star": solid, versatile, stable. His recently an- nounced engagement (later broken) was perhaps a first step toward a semblance of stability. Other steps c0uld be and would be taken. But the type, an assured box office success, must be filled by a younger replacement, a replacement which could be believed by the new younger movie going audience. 51 52 The replacement chosen was James Dean. The concur— rent building of the Dean rebel image while the Brando image was being replaced by that of the conservative artist is obvious and undeniable. It is interesting to note that by the beginning of 1955 James Dean was still not enough of a name to be identi- 1 taken with Marlon Brando on the set of fied in a picture Desiree when it was published in what was probably one of the first popular "one shot" magazines dealing with a single star: Florence Epstein's That Guy_Brando. There was a color picture in the special "I Predict" issue of £29k at the first of the year: "I Predict These Will Be the Bright New Stars of '55"2 and that was identified. Dean's motion picture career was officially launched on a national scale. That same week on January 4, 1955 an appear- ance on the "United States Steel Hour" TV presentation "The Thief" gave interested viewers an opportunity to equate a performance with the face and name. Hedda Hopper also shot one of the opening bolts in the February issue of Motion Picture: "James Dean turned 1 down the lead in The Egyptigp_when Marlon Brando walked out. He insisted on doing his first picture for director Elia Kazan. Evidently it paid off."3 The writers for the slick-paged Vogue chose to unveil Dean with a blurred moody photograph by Jean Howard as the 53 O 0 first of "The Next Successes: Eight Americans in the Arts“ James Dean, thin, intense, with such strong pro— jection that he is always noticed, has brought that In his first projection fairly quickly to the public. movie, East of Eden, still unreleased, he is a smash.4 Others (motion picture and gossip columnists were less restrained) followed the Hopper tack: Watching James Dean watch Marlon Brando Sidney Skolsky: who was casing James Dean at Ella Logan's party.b Erskine Johnson: James Dean is making his film debut in East of Eden, already being hailed as a second Marlon Brando. A comparison he doesn‘t like. But they both come from farms, dress as they please, ride motorcycles, and were developed by Elia Kazan, the director. Dean matches Brando‘s indifference to the press and shares his dislike of small talk. People, he says, were telling him he behaved like Brando before he knew who He‘s just 23 years old and is under It's our guess that you'll The screen can do with a was Brando was. incidentally, contract to Warner Bros. be hearing much about him. couple of actors like Brando. Dean, going with Pier Angeli just before she fell for Vic Damone. Now Dean has shifted to Terry Moore. We're not taking that seriously though.6 By the middle of the month a possible and typical HOllywood feud could have been initiated by the Dean quotation "I am not disturbed by the comparison, in Louis Sobol‘s column: Kate Cameron would seem to add coal to 7 nor am I flattered." "Close your eyes--they are wonder- the fire with her comments: 8 ing just how much of Brando is really Kazan." Attributing the possible success of both actors to the artistic wizardry of Kazan need not have bothered Dean. He had gone to Indiana on a trip with photographer Dennis And by the end for his career a most important trip. Stock, the first advertisements for East of Eden had of the month, appeared in the New York papers. 54 The promotional campaign for East of Edep as detailed in Warner's Press Book of tabloid size running twenty—three pages put almost equal emphasis on Kazan, Dean, Sex and Steinbeck—~in that order. Most evident in the studio inspired copy to be used by local and indulgent journalists was the constant and continued linkage of Dean with the name and career of Marlon Brando: James Dean, whose performance is creating the great- est excitement in Hollywood since Marlon Brando made his debut. His first directorial assignment for Warner Bros. was Streetcar Named Desire which made a star of Marlon Brando. Now Kazan predicts the same sensational stardom for James Dean. Egst of Eden . . . introduces James Dean to motion picture audiences in a debut which is reported to rank favorably with the impact created by Brando‘s initial appearance. . . . owes a big portion of its impact to the per— formance of young James Dean who bids fair to become Hollywood’s hottest property since Marlon Brando. Dean is the young actor being referred to as the greatest talent to reach Hollywood since Marlon Brando. Two catchlines were used in connection with the publicity: “James Dean Must Be Seen" and “James Dean: A Very Special New Star” The Dean name or picture dominated most of the adver— tising lay—outs, often boxed and with one or the other of the catchlines. A special “Pre—Sell" campaign featured Dean in a variety of posters, and theatre exhibitors were urged to purchase lapel buttons to be distributed to their patrons: 55 Capitalize on all the interest being generated by newspapers, fan magazines and nationally known feature writers—~pin one of these lapel buttons on every person who leaves your theatre: "Seen James Dean?" "I've Seen James Dean in East of Eden" Variant advertising devices included special wrappers for the movie edition of East of Eden, published by Grosset and Dunlap, plugging credits and scenes from the film; a sug— gested man-sized telegraph "wire" congratulating Dean, to be signed by fans in the lobby read: Congratulations James Dean on your wonderful per— formance in East of Eden. In your very first picture you have become a very Special star. With sincere admiration The picture-stories for newspaper publication, the color stills for lobbies and fronts, the general-display 11 x 14 stills, all featured Dean prominently. Pictures advertising the film started to appear regu- larly in the New York dailies. The New York Journal-American 1 . . . *9 and was jOined carried pictures at least two days running, in publication by the New York World-Telegram and Sunl; and The New York Timesla in the March 6. 1955 editions. By that time, too, Hedda Hopper's column.13 in gption Picture was long on the stands. Her attitude had mellowed. She declared Dean to be ”sensational, sullen and seductive and is Hollywood's next big star." The Hopper column also mentioned that she heard that Dean "sat outside 56 the church on his motorcycle" while Pier Angeli got married and was now dating Vampira in his new German sports car, "The latest thing in swank." Louella Parsons' "In Hollywood"14 guaranteed he "will be the rave of the season after he is seen . . . he is a great young actor." Parsons also mentioned the ill—fated romance with Pier Angeli, adding that ”before a Warner Bros. scout discovered him in The Immoralist on the New York stage, James had been just a kid struggling for a break and accept— ing what bits were handed out to him on TV or radio," noting that "Dean has had much publicity about being Ianother Marlon Brando,‘ the sweatshirt, motorcycle—riding, grumpy young sophisticate in tennis shoes . . . Now come on, young Mr. Dean, how about forgetting the Brando bit?” Parsons' column was just about repeated-~for a dif- ferent audience-~in the then current issue of Cosmopolitanf"S “Move Over Marlon!“ ordered filmlands It was obvious from his first lines that he could emote with the power and dynamics of Marlon Brando. He's built less bullishly than Marlon but wears the same almost sullen, defiant look that has become part of the Brando legend. His dramatics enhance the dialogue and can, Brando like, affect the most virile man in the audience.16 The full page article with pictures from East of Eden mentioned his "staring into space“ on dates with ”Pier Angeli (before Damone) and Terry Moore,‘ the apartment full of animals, Dean's interest in bull-fighting and motorcycle racing, and concluded: "With a natural dramatic flair and a 57 talent for eccentricities, Jimmy could crowd Marlon off his perch as Number One source for gossip." The week East of Eden opened in New York appeared perhaps the most effective, influential and timely publicity break in Dean's active career. Warner Bros. was to trumpet to its exhibitors that they should back up this ”tremendous publicity,“ this "tribute," "with a top drawer campaign of your own! Start it with a lobby board built around this article."17 The article was "Moody New Star"18 in the Life issue dated March 7, 1955. This article was to set the tone, in pictures and copy, of succeeding publicity releases. The ultimate genesis of the idea of the photographs is somewhat in doubt. The identity of the photographer is not: the pictures were taken the previous month during Dean"s visit to Fairmount and subsequent trip to New York City with photographer Dennis Stock. Stock was the dialogue director for Dean‘s second film, Rebel Without a Cause. According to Stock}9 the initial meeting with Dean took place at the home of 3323; director Nicholas Ray. Ray evidently often had cast and crew members to his home, formally or informally, to work on the then current production. Stock said his job on Rebel came through Nicholas Ray, "more or less political." A Hollywood friend of Dean's said that Jimmy used his influ- ence to get Stock his job as dialogue director. Whatever the case, the Desiree pictures with Brando and Dean were credited 58 to Dennis Stock, and they were taken several months previously. The cultivation of Stock could have been a conscious thing. Dean asked Stock to a preview, along with ”a lot of people." Stock was very impressed with Dean's work on the screen, but when they met later to talk, at Schwabs. it was too noisy to say much of anything. After an hour, though Dean knew Stock had a car ready to take them anywhere they wanted to go, he said, "Hop on the back of my bike." And they raced at breakneck Speed through the Hollywood Hills. With rattling teeth, Stock could barely yell out, “If I go, you go too!" All Stock could do was hang on: He started testing me right at the beginning-- constantly and continually testing. Later, we stopped and talked for about three hours-~about many things. I knew even before then that I wanted to do the pictures. But he had his own ideas. I sold Life on the idea, but he wanted the cover and a writer. I said ‘Forget it!“ He tested, pushed, just to see how far he could go. After several invitations, Stock consented to ac— company Dean. Together they roamed the Indiana countryside, taking shots everywhere: in the house, in the field, in the barnyard, on the mainstreet in town, the motorcycle shOp, the high school Valentine's dance, the mortuary. A shot of Dean lying in a casket——Dean's own idea, said Stock--has never yet been shown in this country. Stock considers his work a real collaboration, in, as he described it, a ”choreographic sense."~ Though perhaps 30% was played "by ear," more often Stock would set up the shot, “let him see me . . . like a motion picture director 59 works with an actor." Later, they went on to New York to— gether, where Stock continued to take pictures; on the streets, in Dean's apartment, in bars and restaurants, dance classes, drum classes. The collection as a whole was a study in contrasts, a la You Can't Go Home Again, a title given by Stock to one of his photographs. As Stock saw it: The real tragedy of James Dean was that he couldn“t partake of the warmth and friendliness of Indiana. The loss of the mother and the rejection of the father was so great a traumatic experience--this testing was perhaps part of it--that, in the end, all he had left were the parasites. The pictures Eiié used for “Moody New Star" heightened the contrasts—~both in selection and lay out. Over the sub— title “Hoosier James Dean Excites Hollywood” appeared a large picture, perhaps 70% of the page, of Dean, dressed in a suit and tie and holding a book, seated in the half light of a cob- web filled, dusty loft. The rustic locale was partially re— called by the language of the accompanying text of the caption: "In Sunday Best Dean reads as he used to when a child after Sunday School in his uncle‘s barn.” The text below the caption began with the pattern set in the Warner Bros. press campaign: “Most exciting actor to hit Hollywood since Marlon Brando," calling his performance "reminiscent of Brando but distinctly his own." Describing him as a “moody, 24— year-old recluse," it lauded his ”skillful portrayal“ of an "unloved problem child" in East of Eden, which “stems partly from his own complex personality and from elements in his own 60 farm—bred early life,‘ adding that the performance had won him a starring role in another big picture Giant, though studio executives were apprehensive about his ”militantly independent offstage behavior and his scorn for movie con- vention." This text was framed on the right side with a small still from East of Eden. There was an implication that the presented selection was a newsworthy scoop because Dean was "shy of publicity which he feels might show him in a false light.” The pre- sentation was offered to show "how he reacted to life on the farm and how it contrasts with his new one.” Overleaf, two large farm pictures, balanced at op— posite sides of the two page spread, dominated and contrasted strongly with the accompanying New York shots. In the farm pictures, Dean wore rough clothes and a cap; the only other figures were animals. One shot, with a large hog, was burlesqued as a tin—type family portrait; in the other Dean sat cross-legged in a feeding bin, surrounded by hungry cattle. The caption read: "He has always liked animals because they accept him on his own terms." On either side, below the animal pictures, was yet another contrasting set. In one, Dean talks with his grandfather, a burly farmer, straight out Of Norman Rockwell, about family matters; in juxtaposition to it is a shot of Dean, feet on the desk of a bespectacled, natty, New York type business manager, discussing finance. Centered above, was Dean in the dressing room of his good friend Geraldine Page, who was still starring on Broadway in The Immoralist: "He feels at ease in settings like this with friends he respects." The dressing room mirror was lined with clippings and photos of Dean. Below, center, a shot of Dean, peering from under his brows out on to the street from a chair in a furniture store show window. Passersby could be seen walking in front of the window, re- flected in it. They stare back at the curious figure in the chair. The caption: "Like an actor, says Dean, the observer here looks out at the world as it appears from within and is in turn looked at from without by the world‘s passersby." I The accompanying text divided about equally psycho— logical and professional information. The interest in sports, the Indiana Speech award, the U.C.L.A. pre-law studies, the Broadway award were all mentioned, as were "his eccentricities,‘l his "sincere but incessant self analysis." Depicting him as "intense and introspective," ”with the dedication of an artist," the article .also noted that Jimmy gave up music "when his mother died.“ On the final page of the four page Spread was a Single picture showing Dean, muffled and dressed in a dark overcoat, as in the other New York Shots, walking in the rain, alone on an almost deserted Times Square. The brief caption spoke Of his anonymous wandering: "His top floor garret on Man— hattan's West Side is no more home to him, he says, than the 62 farm in Indiana. But he feels that his continuing attempt to find out just where he belongs is the source of his strength as an actor." The appeal of the pictures and the text as a whole was hardly romantic and certainly not sexy—~stock in trade of the typical Hollywood publicity Spread on a new leading man. The appeal was rather to concern, even pity, perhaps ad- miration-—for the motherless, talented, generally misunder— stood but dedicated individual who overcame many obstacles, who from a Simple beginning was rising to fame, taking his place with the accepted stars——yet still seeking new, but personal, goals. And above it all predominates the sense of alienation which follows Dean wherever he goes. East of Eden officially opened in New York at the Astor Theatre on March 10, 1955 after a Special preview performance the previous evening. The preview was a much ballyhooed benefit for the Actors Studio. Everyone was there-—even Marilyn Monroe was a program girl. Everyone, that is, except James Dean. Since knowledge of exactly who is responsible for What in a film is virtually impossible to have unless one is in some way connected with the production of that film, but since Elia Kazan is credited with being both the producer and director of East of Eden, the picture Shall be approached as a Kazan production. 63 A Golden Boy on the Hollywood lots Since the pro— duction of On the Waterfront, Kazan had a virtually free hand in the production of East of Eden. It would be up to Kazan to try to prove to Hollywood and to the world that Cinemascope, Hollywood's answer to the television screen, could be used successfully in “intimate" drama. Kazan has himself said, "Broadway is a writer's theatre films are a director's medium. On Broadway you have to wait for playwrights you like to come along. In the movies you can initiate, and film writers are more amenable."20 The probably amenable Paul Osborn's screenplay of John Steinbeck‘s figst of Eden bore but little resemblance to the novel as a whole. Ignoring the first 75% of the book, Osborn worked only with the last hundred pages or so, even there concentrating and distilling events and characters. Various sub-plots were omitted. The major character of Lee, Steinbeck‘s choral character throughout the novel,was completely done away with, his Speeches Spoken variously by the Sheriff and Abra, whose roles in the story were therefore amplified and made more sympathetic, though the moral core became diffused. Exami— nation of the final shooting script Showed evidence, too. that the role of Anne, cleaning girl cum prostitute in one of Kate‘s houses, was intended to be amplified, though few of her scenes remained in the release print. Compression of time and reference centered on the struggles of Cal in trying to gain his father's recognition and love: 64 East of Eden Synopsis (Not for publication) Among the students rushing from classes at the end of the day, Aron Trask (RICHARD DAVALOS) and his girl friend, Abra (JULIE HARRIS) are joined by Aron's brother, Cal, (JAMES DEAN). He follows the couple to an ice house where their father, Adam Trask (RAYMOND MASSEY),is excitedly explaining to Will Hamilton (ALBERT DEKKER) his plan to keep vegetables fresh by refrigeration. In introducing his two sons Adam plainly reveals that Aron is the favorite. That evening, Cal learns from Sheriff Sam Cooper (BURL IVES) his mother, who deserted Adam years before, is Kate (JO VAN FLEET), owner of a notorious gambling and dance hall. When Adam's refrigeration project fails, Cal anxious to win his father's affection, enters into a profitable venture with Will. One night at an amusement park, Cal offers Abra a ride on the ferris wheel. She protests her love for Aron, but passionately returns Cal's kiss. At Adam's birthday celebration, Cal makes elaborate preparations to present to his father all the profits from the speculation. However, Adam reprimands his son for profiteering and Cal is further denounced by his brother. With that, Cal de- cides to reveal the secret of their mother. Following the meeting with his mother, and discovering Abra‘s love for Cal, it is a drunken and completely changed Aron who bids Adam farewell before departing to join the Army. Stricken at the turn of events, Adam is carried home. There, as Abra pleads, Adam finally acknowledges Cal, blesses them both. Running Time: 115 min21 AS the script was worked out, the major characters throughout the better portion of the film fell to one side or the other of a Good—Bad scale. Morally loaded because of an oversimplification of the issues in the novel, the script equated Good vs. Bad with Idealism VS. Cynicism-Fatalism. The hazy moralism of this equation resulted in some inter- esting but morally ridiculous parallelisms as the script progressed. 65 Cal, "high-strung,” cannot be figured out by his father ("I don't understand him.“), and feels he has been displaced in his father's affections by his more superficial brother Aron. Cal equates himself with his mother (”She ain't no good, and I ain‘t no good.“L When Cal asks his father what his mother was like, Adam replies: "I never knew she wasn't like other people. There was something She seemed to lack. Kindness-—maybe conscience." Further at- tempts to communicate with his father appear fruitless: "Talk to me father—-I gotta know who I am; I gotta know what I‘m like. I gotta know!" So Cal turns to his mother: "Talk to me please, Mother!” with even more brutal results. Rescued by the Sheriff after being beaten and thrown out of his mother's ”house" ("I hate her. And I hate him too.“), Cal is assured by the Sheriff that he should not be too hard on his father because Adam has ."more kindness and conscience than any man I've ever known." Cal's previous behavior has earned him the name at school ”the prowler"; his father thinks him ”thoughtless” and “inconsiderate"; to his brother, to Will Hamilton, and to Rantani, the bean farmer, he's “crazy“; to Abra, “he's scary--sorta like an animal." Lack of love seems to be Cal‘s problem. Not sex. Abra notes: “Girls follow you around." Even Abra is intrigued by the amoral sexuality Cal seems to exude: "I know love is good the way Aron says, but it's more than that. It's got to be. . . ." 66 Cal can't figure himself out: "I'm sorta twisted I scare myself." Even Abra notices that Cal ”is alone all the time." The good Adam, secure in self—righteousness, cannot understand him, and his good brother Aron, depicted and portrayed as officious and smug, is no help at all. Cal can turn only to Kate (Abra would not seem to be much help since she's as mixed up as he). Kate receives him as a re— flection of herself: I‘You‘re a nice looking boy . . . you got sense. Maybe you don't fall for that slop any more than I do. Maybe you know what people are really like. What they really want. . . ." Cal‘s alienation-—Cal against the world—— is complete when he finds he is able to use Kate and her money as a tool in the attempt to gain his father's recog- nition. Kate accedes because Cal is a "likeable kid," and because she is amused by the irony of the situation. When this attempt proves abortive, Cal again uses Kate, this time as a weapon against his brother. Torn by guilt and frustra- tion, Cal's violent emotional binges can find no relief or release except in the betrayal of his brother‘s faith and idealism. Then, in a contrived denouement, his brother's spirit broken, his father's resultant stroke leaving him half paralyzed, Cal confesses his guilt and forgives his father- After Abra's prognosis of the situation: Excuse me, Mr. Trask, for daring to speak to you this way, but it's awful not to be loved. It's the worst thing in the world. Don't ask me how I know that, I just know it. It makes you, it makes you mean and violent and cruel. And that's the way Cal 67 has always felt all his life. I know you didn't mean it to be that way, but it's true. You never gave him your love. You never asked him for his. You never asked him for one thing. Cal's going away, Mr. Trask, but before he goes, well-m-well, he did something very bad and I'm not asking you to forgibe him. You have to give him some Sign that you love him, or else he‘ll never be a man. He'll just keep on feeling guilty and alone unless you release him. ——Adam forgives Cal. AS Cal, James Dean exhibited an unusual Cinematic quality in East of Eden. The physicality and forcefulness of his projection of the emotion~bound adolescent was notable for its well rounded exactness. The loose, bouncy walk, the flailing arms, the sometimes jerky movements——quick, after moments of inactivity, the sudden stops——all portray with meticulous care the still uncoordinated, less than mature person. Dean intensified the expression of Cal's lack of love by embracing with complete freedom and lack of inhibition even inanimate objects in his search for warmth and affection—— the Sheriff's water cooler, the locker in the high school, Abra‘s house——aS, indeed, from time to time, he embraced himself, touching his mouth, his lips, his hair, his hands in and out of his pockets. Considering the fact that Kazan kept his camera on Dean throughout so much of the picture, one can observe, too, the quality of his reaction--perhaps most noticeable in the scenes with Abra or Kate: the sudden half—born smiles of agreement, the lifting of the head as interest quickens, the false starts of an intended answer, 68 the gulp. So exact was the characterization, one even accepts the unexpected; the stolen drag on Will's cigarette in the locker room, the tense moment as Kate signs the check, his hand, seeming to be unconsciously reaching out—~then grabbing, the leap to the train, the attack on Aron, the antic dance in the bean field as he exhorts the shoots to grow- The physicality of all other scenes is in marked con— trast to the lack of physicality exhibited in the love scenes. Dean's Cal, though reputedly sexy, seems to be searching more for a mother image than Aron is. Giving the promise of an amoral sexuality, Dean's Cal presents us with a moral asexuality. Spying on Aron and Abra in the ice—house, Cal sees Abra rock Aron in her arms and hum a lullaby as they talk about marriage, but, especially, motherhood. In a fit of rage and jealousy, he hurls the ice blocks down the chute. Later, when Abra tells him of her dissatisfaction with the role Aron has thrust upon her, he turns to her hungering for a kiss, lips expectant. She kisses him, his hands never touch her; psychologically and photographically, she is on top. The lullaby music swells. Dean's Cal is mirrored in the vaguely asexual and maternal quality of Julie Harris's Abra. She is continually smoothing Cal's hair, as a mother might for a small child. The obligatory final kiss might be between a brother and a sister, or a mother and a son. Indeed, the music which rises to a climax at this final scene is again the major theme, the lullaby Abra bummed to Aron. 69 In this film Kazan was to utilize not only the hall— marks of his style as an actor's director, but a heightened awareness for the resources of the cinematic art. The inter- play of light and Shadow when Cal emerges from the leaves of the willow to tempt Aron is like an illustration for the book of Genesis. When Cal forces the confrontation of Aron and Kate, his shadow on the floor is almost like another character in the scene. During the imaginative, though some— what forced, angle shots with the tilted table top during the dialogue between Cal and Adam, the Bible and the condiment holder provide an ever-present wall, an obstacle to their com- munication. We are led into the movie with the misty. other— vmrldly quality of the filtered opening shots of Cal stalking Kate, panning with Kate's walk to pick up and cover the waiting figure of Cal, sitting hunched at the curb, until he dominates the screen. The ascending notes of the musical commentary hold him in the consciousness of the audience~— as he hovers in the background of the long and, for him, wordless opening scene. The tilting camera, when Cal on a swing, crouched like an ape, returns to his father after Aron has confronted Kate,“shows us momentarily the boy's kaleidosc0pic, off—balance View of the world from the swing Which is wonderfully expressive of the defiant youngster's sense of abandon."22 In color, too, Kazan found new expression, as Dorothy Jones also noted: 70 Yellow is usually a youthful color. In East of Eden (Kazan) the scene dramatizing the growing attraction between Cal and Abra is drenched in sunshine and pictured in and against a field of yellow pepper grass in full bloom. Warmth and joy permeate this scene, partly through the use of the brilliant yellow color to frame the gaity and affection between these two young people. Indeed, the employment and juxtaposition of imagi- native camera shots, color, music, light and shadow enabled the characters, themselves, to become psychological symbols in Kazan's stylized presentation of naturalistic phenomena, enhancing their dramatic values in the script while, simul- taneously, providing a striking and arresting pattern for the eye and ear. And projected over the overall pattern is the figure of James Dean, or Cal, for the two terms are, by now, virtually interchangeable: the semi-orphan boy who cannot communicate with his parents, who doesn't know what he really is; sexually frustrated, he tries to do good but finds only rejection; in alienation, he rebels, seeking an outlet through emotional binges and violence. The convergence of publicized personal image and Screen image produce a satis— fying cohesion, further facilitating audience identification, giving new proportion and dimension to the whole. The New York reviews were mixed and yet often ex- pansively congratulatory——eSpecially regarding Dean. Frank Quinn of the Daily Mirror called the picture a "masterpiece," "23 With Dean ”destined for a blazing career. Kate Cameron in the Daily News hailed a "new Star.“24 The New York figurnal—American reviewer called Dean "an important new 71 screen personality . . . even though his mannerisms and delivery were frequently remindful of Marlon Brando.”25 Whitney Bolton in the_New York World-Telegram and Sun addressed his review "To a Young Actor Aping Mr. Brando, William Zinsser in the-New York HeraldyTribune saw Dean as reflecting "some dark joke known only to him. You sense "27 the badness in him. But you also like him. Bosley Crowther of The New York Times pulled no punches about what he called "histrionic gingerbread”: Never have we seen a performer so clearly follow another's style . . . he scuffs his feet, he whirls, he pouts, he sputters, he leans against walls, he rolls his eyes, he swallows his words, he ambles Slack—kneed--all like [sic] Marlon Brando used to do . . Mr. Kazan Should never have permitted such a thing.28 Could criticism ever be more commercially apt? When an unknown in his first motion picture is compared to the current Academy Award nominee——that's box office! In the ensuing decade, East of Eden was to gross over $5,000,000 in . 29 domestic rentals alone for Warner Bros. The New York Times softened the scorching review by printing in advance a Special Dean interview by Howard 30 Thompson. Thompson wrote that he found Dean impressive and enigmatic: He sat quietly awaiting the first query. The slender frame and boyish features suggested a Booth Tarkington hero. The black corduroy Shirt and trousers and a penetrating neutrality of expression, magnified by large steel spectacles, did not. 72 To Thompson Dean expressed his psychological attitude toward his art: Acting is the most logical way for people's neuroses to manifest themselves in this great need we all have to express ourselves. To my way of thinking, an actor's course is set even before he's out of the cradle. Dean's ultimate aim was to achieve what he called “camera functioning" on the stage. He expressed his admira— tion of Lee Strasberg, whom he called “an incredible man, a walking encyclopedia with fantastic insight.” The article closed with Dean's tribute to the vitality and fertility of New York. He stated his belief that in Hollywood, too, though they're harder to find, "are human beings just as sen81tive to fertility. The problem for this cat--myself-—is not to get lost.” The strange intermixture of psychological cant and jive talk was evidently part of the man and was to become part of the Dean legend. Thomas M. Pryor in The New York Times relayed the news that Elizabeth Taylor and James Dean had been selected for leading roles in the Warner Bros. production giagg, based on Edna Ferber's novel.3'l Louis Sobol's “On the Broadway Beat“ commented on the "32 "fake feud between Brando and Dean. The more "serious" film publication Eilms in Review carried a lengthy analysis of East of Eden in a two part review.33 Robert Kass thought the picture "comes off extremely 73 well." Though he considered it "watered—down Steinbeck,“ it was "virile as film." Kass mused over “Kazan's under- standing and compassion for the adolescent's confUSion.” finding it "curiously intense-—almost personally so.” He was bothered by production "tricks," pinpoint lighting. obvious camera movement, attempts at a mysterioso effect with faces blotted out by lighting or scenic pieces, muted dia- logue, etc., and was especially vehement about the acting techniques employed and exhibited; Kazan's tricks have their limitations and the school of acting promoted by the Actors Studio, which Kazan supports, can be a bore as well as ineffective, viz: the line tossed over the shoulder as a character walks away from the camera; the line muttered incoherently from a head resting in the crook of an arm; absurd body contortions gotten into under the mistaken impression they are non—acting acting and thus connote naturalism. Kass felt that some of these mannerisms get in the way of Dean. Since so much of Dean's voice and so many of his mannerisms suggest Marlon Brando, Kass felt that Dean's possibilities as an actor were not fully on view in §§§E_Q£ he considered Dean's performance an im— Eden. Nevertheless, pressive film debut: “He is younger than Brando or Montgomery Clift (24) and may well outgrow the acting style he has adopted, or been forced into for this film.” The latter half of the review by Ralph Gerstlé sug— gested the film to be a "tour de force by Ted McCord " the cinematographer. Whether or not Gerstlé was correct in praising McCord for the photographic effects achieved, the review cited two dramatic instances in the film where by 74 idsual communication the domination of the "bleak hiber— nation" of Cal's spirit is explored: A shot of his dark troubled face framed between two huge blocks of ice . . . and in the final scene, a wonder— fully framed close two shot of Cal's head against his father's is followed by a high angle medium shot of the room with the bed in the background, and the father lying in it almost lifeless and Cal, a very small figure in the The shot is a soft focus one room, crouching alongside. and its effect is not sombre. but with low key lighting, peaceful, as it should be, to suit the ending of the story itself. Sidney Skolsky's column on March 21, 1955 mentioned seeing "Jimmy Dean in a black leather jacket and wearing his customary eye—glasses, standing unrecognized outside of the Egyptian Theater watching the people standing in line to buy tickets for East of Eden."34 A later Skolsky column on March 24 mentioned Dean's friendship with Maila Nurmi.35 A filler publicity item from UPI in New York's World—Telegram spoke of Dean's changed curriculum at UCLA with "Drama Dean‘s Dish, Not Law.”36 The release of East of Eden increased national inter- est in Dean. The congratulatory reviews in the national magazines alternately praised the daring of the script (e g. ngk: “Reflects a new relaxation in film censorship")3' and the arresting appearance of the new star (” As a complex and troubled adolescent who feels unloved by everyone around him, Dean, under Elia Kazan's direction, is a touching little monster."L covering the now usual tack of finding reminiscent of Brando. L995 Dean's "acrobatic mannerisms" patted itself on the back in the review by referring to its ”I Predict . . .” article three months earlier. 75 With the Academy Awards around the corner, the pub- licity build-up for Marlon Brando was also pitched to still greater intensity. Youth magazines38 and a news service release commented on the change from the ”old Brando“: from ”brute to genial actor."39 Sidney Skolsky continued his almost one man publicity campaign with a fairly long entry in his column of April 8th: Jimmy Dean goes into a scene in Rebel Without a Cause for director Nicholas Ray and looks exactly the same, except for the eye glasses, as when I meet him with the Schwab'S-Googie's set. Jimmy is wearing the same blue jeans and black leather jacket,40 Column items like this would serve several purposes. They helped to announce and publicize a forthcoming pro- duction: Warner Bros. had Shifted position, moved Dean into a quickie to capitalize on the personal success he found in East of Eden. Also, the personal identification of a star with a role is often enhanced by the costume. In this particu- lar case the outfit mentioned was the exact costume Marlon now standard Brando wore in his delinquency film The Wild One, uniform for ”wild ones" the country over. In reference to this item, it might be noted that Dean did not wear a black leather jacket in Rebel, but Since the film was not to be re— who would remember? A further infor- leased for seven months, mation bit added by Skolsky, though probably based on fact, without clarification accentuates the eccentric syndrome: before going into a scene, will take a short or Jimmy will jump up and Jimmy, Dean has to be in run around the sound stage, down before going to play the scene. action before going into action. 76 United Press syndicator Aline Mosby contributed to a new dimension of Dean's character under the heading ”Not a "He is at times moody and/or shy. He Brando Claims Dean": is also intelligent, and his conversation compared to most Hollywood actors is positively brilliant."4l Louella Parsons added the standard comment for up-and— coming star material: she considered Dean "not in the least Spoiled." She said that Dean considers ”Elia Kazan largely responsible for his success."42 This comment was followed several days later by her announcement that Dean was slated to play the leading role in the Rocky Graziano autobiography Somebody Up There Likes Me for MGM in return for the loan of Elizabeth Taylor in Giant: "I guess this boy can play any- thing."43 Skolsky gave Dean two more items44 in the course of the month, both just brief mentions to keep the name in the public eye, the latter containing variations on the "recluse“ theme of earlier promotion, citing Dean's newly found "hideaway" home in the hills. Hedda Hopper opened the field in May"*‘5 with a refer- ence to Dean's interest in the occult, noting the fact that Dean's ”dating" of Vampira (Maila Nurmi) was occaSioned by his interest in her interest in the occult. She was dropped because she ”knows nothing." In apposition to this item of information Hopper mentioned the St. Christopher medal Dean wears——a gift of Pier Angeli. A study in related contrasts! 77 Film Life continued with more normal matinee idol building45 describing "the DEAN of Hollywood's younger crop of top notch swooner stars" as having ”sex appeal, plus-— the plus being talent." A brief article continues: "Jimmy Dean——the man——the boy--the actor——is likable in every role~— when he wants to be——which unfortunately isn't very often " The article mentions his "cool, steady nerves” which serve him in good stead in his racing hobby, and the shyness, the gentleness that people who know him see. As is true of all articles of this period, the Brando comparison is also here, "Jimmy bitterly and, in this case, perhaps somewhat barbed: resents being likened to Brando, played the drums before coming to Hollywood." By this time the fan magazines, too, were coming out with reviews of Eden, described in glowing terms: “Darken your TV screens, take along a handkerchief. Your emotions will be deeply touched."47 “The Schlitz Playhouse of Stars” offered a Dean per- formance, a performance by the now established star, in a teleplay "The Unlighted Road,"4‘E3 happily filmed, permitting many subsequent replays. Dean played an ex-G.I. recently returned from Korea, Jeff Latham. Currently a drifter, lonely and searching for friends and values, Jeff's miSplaced trust leads him to the threshold of a criminal career. Only the 78 faith and love of a girl can and does redeem him. Though the character Dean played here may seem more mature on the surface, the tentative gropings for love and acceptance, matched by the hesitations and calculated confusions of his acting style, presented Jeff Latham as thoroughly consistent with the Dean image thus far presented in films and through the various publicity sources. The fairly polished filmed introduction to the play, narrated by Dean out of character, was often omitted in later presentations. And Sidney Skolsky went right on with his Dean pub— licity campaign in his column, heading it “James Dean Own Stunt Man,”49 likening Dean to former swashbuckling romantic lead Errol Flynn, who was also reputed to do his own stunts. Even the reviewer for the usually stolid Today: The ggtholic Youth Magazine labeled East of Eden a ”solid—as— "50 The reviewer, Donald P. Costello, concrete film masterpiece. cited especially the change imposed upon "Steinbeck's long, He felt that Steinbeck's “dirt“ had abused and ugly novel." been changed "to a paean to the importance of love.’I Costello vouched the film "proved the value of Cinemascope” in that the director was able ”to develop dramatically Sig— nificant and true ideas without sacrificing anything of action or form." Eden was both "fine and art." Modern Screen described the young star: As anyone who has watched his electric performance in East of Eden will testify, Jimmy has an inexplicable, boyish magnetism, a youngish sex appeal. One senses 79 latent passion, great depth and seething. smoldering energy and wonders about a momentary eruption.5' Yet, it quoted one young unnamed actress: "There's nothing original about Jimmy Dean" She called him a Brando copy. The article further recounted how Dean lost Pier Angeli who was reputed to be closer to Pier s mother s to Vic Damone, the ideal of "a good Catholic boy." Going back even further, article told of Dean‘s life on the prOSperous farm of his Indiana, and "nowhere in uncle, three miles from Fairmount, that-small, clean town can you find anyone to say a harsh word about him." Current less than laudatory rumors were explained away by an anonymous ”Warner's publicity man”: He's hard to figure out . . . He's one kind you can't figure. The only concessions he will make are to his own conscience. He is determined to live his life in his own way—~not according to the rules of a young actor S cone duct as prescribed by Hollywood. The enthusiasm for Dean exhibited by American fans seemed matched by that of European critics as initial impres— sions from foreign publications began to filter back to America. Derek Prouse reviewed East of Eden for Sight and Sound52 and found the film as a whole an ”empty Show” of M oppressive tedium . . . a film without a centre": Lack of genuine response and the consequent inability essence of the situ- to convey to his actors the core and ation . . . seems to lead Kazan to favor an acting style The actors Sidle that discourages any direct expression. up to their lines, juggle with them, break them up into erupt into sudden shouts or Sink into unusual stresses, elaborately natural calm. To the basic themes of the various natures of love (distorting, blinding, or satisfying, and the consuming loneliness of the boy who yearns for it) Kazan only ever 80 The most consistent The action of offers a peripheral illustration. moment by quality of this is a virile assertiveness. the story seems to be presented explosively, moment, and these separate stresses never make up a believable rhythmic flow. For James Dean, however, the praise is strong: James Dean is a discovery of outstanding talent——at the moment heavily influenced alike by Kazan and Brando, he is sometimes at the mercy of these stylistic borrow1ngs insufficiently absorbed into a final creative authority. But on occasion when his own vivid actor's imagination he is striking. takes wing and bursts these limitations, the truth of his character- For much of the time, however, as if he instinctively felt that a ization is cautious. more complex relationship with the others would only in— volve him with the surrounding falseness. An unusual tie~in in the Dean-brando linkage appeared as the caption to Frank Degan's Brando article ”From T—shirt to Bow Tie"53 in the June issue of Screenland. The Brando—Dean picture on the Desiree set was used with the mention that "The pre—analysis Brando and present day James Dean to the contrary, however separate and talented, inte- it appears best that man, grate himself with society." Sidney Skolsky in his column54 said he had had no problems with Dean, reputedly "a difficult fellow to under— Skolsky believed Dean gained such a reputation be— stand.” Skolsky proved cause ”it's hard for Jimmy to trust a person." ins point with a picture of the two of them together. The Brando—Dean feud earlier dreamed up was fanned Vflth a reported Brando quotation: Jim and I worked together at the Actors Studio in New York, and I have great respect for his talent. However . . . Mr. Dean appears to be wearing my last Year's wardrobe and using my last year's talent.'3 81 It should not be presumed that a critical comment like this from Brando should or could in any way hurt or It was quite conSistent, showing the destroy either's image. at the same current Brando separation from a Dean-like image, time accepting it as a valid performance. A further comment in the same interview critical of Brando's film The Wild One may indeed be a preparation of the public for acceptance of Dean's latest film Rebel Without a Cause, now finished and awaiting release: The making of The Wild One was a disappointment to There are so many kids who are confused today. This me. problem has not been intelligently articulated. The‘Wild One's script ambled and was not focused. Hedda Hopper was prompted into new raves, calling .5 , ' 6 She then made a curious Dean "the hottest actor in town. ploy regarding East of Eden in an attempted Brando—Dean con— "Marlon Brando turned down the role Dean played," nection: ”AS talented if not moreso She continued even more curiously: than Brando, Dean used to herd cows on a motorcycle.“ In this single item, Hopper employed linkage between Brando and Dean, in a most unlikely situation, and to Dean's advantage. The employment of Marlon Brando to play a teenager Dean's performance in would be ludicrous—-but she said it. the role was generally winning raves, and Since Brando had just won the Academy Award, to compare Dean in his first picture to would certainly constitute a plug for Dean. him, and favorably. Another Hedda Hopper's favorites were usually never in doubt. Possible but unlikely combination, the herding cows on a 82 motorcycle, presented a composite image of daring, eccen— triCity. and originality. teetering on a relationship be— tween Rebel Without a Cause, and Dean's new film giant. now g... in the making. The HOpper enthusiasms over Dean were repeated in her estimation of the current crop of "Young Men of Hollywood” in the June issue of gggonet.57 Skolsky continued with an unusually long column on Dean. Acting in general and Dean's acting in particular is discussed as an expression of ”the fantasies in which they [the actors] have involved themselves.“ Dean is “much like Cal”: ". . . actually, what was in the movie came out of him——even those bits resembling Marlon Brando." Dean is further described as ”sensitive, easily hurt and difficult for a person to reach. He pretends to be aloof . . . is un- disciplined . . . but loyal to his friends."5£3 Skolsky‘s description of Dean's preparations for an acting stint might be thought of as exaggerated, but as was the case in his previous descriptions and from other evidences. the account was probably based on truth: He usually wanders away and has to be summoned to play a scene. Generally he comes running to do the scene. Or he will stand to the Side of the camera jumping and waving his arms (“I try for relaxation be- fore acting."). Sometimes he will box a little with his stand-in, former champ fighter, Mushy Callahan. The article concluded with a reference to Pier Angeli 5 wedding and the fact that Dean “stood across the street after 83 the ceremony. He must win at everything he does.“ Skolsky, a Dean supporter, had in this case turned a negative and possibly mythical incident into a positive commentary. An interview with Joe Hyams dated June 30, 195559 finds the tables turned on the interviewer: in his leather jacket Dean "asks questions relentlessly." The brevity of the item did not preclude the formation of an oddly ambiguous yet consistent image. Turning the tables on the interviewer and the wearing of the black leather jacket coincide with the rebellious Dean, personally and cinematically. The re— lentless asking of questions repeats a previously tried move to paint Dean as a searching intellectual. The columnist of the proper Christian Science Monitor, 0 Richard Dyer MacCann,8 was not concerned that his June inter— view might not match most of the preceding: There seem to be a good many versions of James Dean's approach to life, and it may well be that most of them are founded, more or less, on fact. Newcomers in Holly- wood are likely to be misinterpreted, in any case. Some of them encourage conflicts in interpretation: such conflicts are dramatic and likely to focus attention on the subject. MacCann “got an impression of powerful intenSity“ and of keen intelligence from this new ”bobby-sox idol." MacCann cited the fact that even though Dean's role in East of Eden. was ”a kind of archetype for whining delinquents . . . count- less feminine moviegoers of all ages evidently watched his shambling gait and listened to his inarticulate yearnings with 84 maternal devotion." Their devotion manifested itself in the form of fan mail, which, according to MacCann, ranked Dean "with the top four or five actors in popularity " Dean, who didn't "necessarily Shamble or mumble,” approached his adolescent roles by trying to imitate life; It is the romanticized conception of the juvenile. he declares in round clear tones, that causes much of our trouble withwdelinquency‘nowadays. The Wild One, for in- stance--it had, so far as I can see, no good effect. It just encouraged these kids to go out and buy black leather jackets and a motorcycle and act like Brando in the picture. You can't Show them some far off idyllic conception of behavior if you want the kids to come and see the picture. You've got to Show what it's really like, and try to reach them on their own grounds. The MacCann interview was, of course, a plug for Rebel. Dean's further remarks, as printed, concerned that film: I think one thing this picture shows that's new is the psychological diSproportion of the kids' demands on the parents. Parents are often at fault, but the kids have some work to do, too . . . You know, a lot of times an older boy, one of the fellows the young ones idolized, can go back to the high school kids and tell them. 'look what happened to me! Why be a punk and get in trouble with the law? Why do all these senseless things just for a thrill?‘ I hope this film will do something like that. I hope it will remind them that other people have feelings. Perhaps they will say, 'What do we need all that for?' In a single step Dean contributed to the intellectual, socially conscious aspect of his image, retaliated against the Brando comments_ and plugged his new picture. Whether this was done by Dean with a conscious knowledge of the particu- lar audience he would reach, or whether this was Slanted by the interviewer who knew the audience he was writing for, the picture of Dean which emerges from this interview is that 85 which is most likely to appeal to the readers of The Christiag Science Monitor and is yet thoroughly consistent with remarks and diSposition noted in other publications. The disparity of the readership of The Christian Science Monitor and, that of, say, Photoplay, is countered by the consistency of the image presented. The summer's end found Dean the man winding up work on his third Hollywood film. By this time he was firmly enough established for the fan magazines to take particularized interest in his case-~the small gossip squibbs, the one or two page features were being enlarged to full length spreads. The time lag can be partly accounted for by the peculiarities of the fan magazine publishing routine. Most of the monthlies, and not all fan magazines were issued monthly, came out almost a full month in advance of the cover date. An analysis of content further reveals that comment is limited to events occurring usually a full month preceding the issuing date. Consequently, even the most popular and successful fan maga- zines, the monthlies, were, for all the claims of "sc00p” and "exclusive,” a full two months behind the more regularly appearing news and advertising media. The effect of this peculiarity was to have particular Significance in the build- ing of the Dean image. Yet another reason for the publicity to become heavier was the now only average sales resulting from the 86 release of East of Eden. A hypo to the fan trade could mean a hypo to the box office. Also. Rebel Without a Cause was in the cans awaiting a later release; gianp, the block—buster, was in the making. The Dean image must be prepared to take its place beside those of Rock Hudson and Elizabeth Taylor. the firmly entrenched co—stars of that film. Screen Album for August of 1955 in a “Spec1al Report: Young Love" included “A Heart That Stalked in Darkness,“59 featuring a compendium of Dean public1ty Spots, including a Dorothy Kilgallin comment on the intractability of the new star: he "had to become a big Star' and 'a big headache“; also included were Louis Sobol's Brando—Dean routine and the comment that Dean t"even goes to Marlon s psychiatrist Present, too, were the continued comments about the lost love of Pier Angeli, though, by now, the softening effect of com- ments on the new dates, the new “flames,' added new spice to the old routine. This particular piece noted a present to Dean from Lili Kardell, bosomy starlet——a new oil filter for his sports car. 62 Filmland played up Terry Moore, another young and bosomy starlet, and also managed, one might add, through the same agent handling Jane Deacy's West Coast affairs concerning Dean, Dick Clayton. Terry had been around for a while, and, though still young and despite sexpot publiCity, never seemed to be able to quite make it out of the "B“ pictures. 87 Phlmland commented: “Julie Harris got Jimmy in East of Eden. but it was Terry who shared his limelight at its preem” on the West Coast. that is. Though this was the only photo— graphically documented ”date" of the two, the article declared: "When Terry talked up religion, Jimmy became her devoted church escort." To prove her closeness to her “devoted" escort. Miss Moore analyzed Dean's character as a 'combination of insecurity coupled with a driving ambition that visualized a SpeCific goal—~to get to the top." _greenland added to the store of unlikely romantic legends noting that James Dean and Mercedes McCambridge were two rugged individualists who love to discuss acting. books. and music. Yet another gossip blurb. filliped with a small picture bearing no relationship to the text. said: ‘The line used to read, 'Come up to my apartment and see my etchings ' Cornball! Jimmy Dean now says to the dolls. 'I ll be over to your apartment and help you With the scene“€53 A major and lengthy article appeared in Modern Screen in this same month. Entitled "Lone Wolf,”54 it constituted an interesting juxtaposition of attack and apologia almost unique in this particular period in Dean's career. Prefaced with a brief editorial entitled ”The Hottest Kids in Hollywood,” Modern Screen purported to unveil in this issue the ”new" Hollywood star image: These kids are different . . . these kids spark be— cause they have natural greatness. They know where they're going and exactly how to get there. 88 Among the stars listed as this new breed was the "moody, unapproachable Jimmy Dean“: "James Byron Dean is a free-wheeling individualist who breaks all the rules except one-vhe travels fastest who travels alone.” Commenting especially on Dean's lack of publicity co- operation, the article said that: Jimmy is not particularly well liked by some of his studio colleagues these days because he refuses to Show up for interviews, declines to be photographed, breaks appointments with reckless abandon, and insists upon keeping his private life private. A Dean quotation was given in explanation: Maybe publicity is important. But I just can't make it, can't get with it. I've been told by a lot of guys the way it works. The newspapers give you a big build—up. Something happens, they tear you down. Who needs it? What counts to the artist is performance, not publicity. Guys who don't know me, already they've typed me as an odd ball . . . Most of it is a bunch of ! Further comments on Dean's general taciturnity and his sense of humor were made by an unnamed actress and Lili Kardell. Despite no really unfavorable comments by either lady. the article noted that Dean's sense of humor ”is generously described as slightly perverse.” An example given was the picture taking at Wilbur Hunt's mortuary during Dennis Stock's Fairmount visit. Dean's comment: Anyway, he shot the pictures. Great stuff? Sent them into Life. Know what? The editors wouldn't publish a single one. Printed some stuff of me around the farm. Country boy-—that routine! Further perversity, said the article, was demonstrated by Dean's sports car racing in Palm Springs and Bakersfield. A Warner “executive" was quoted as saying, “That crazy kid is 90ing to kill himself!" 89 There were added details of Dean's current screen work, including an interview with Jim Backus, "Dean's On- Stage Dad" in Rebel Without a Cause: I've played fight scenes before. this. Jim is so carried away. such a pitch of intensity. me. No kiddin'l In one rehearsal he grabbed me by the lapels. carried me down the stairs. room sofa. This kid is strong as a bull. In another rehearsal he broke off parts of the stair railing, but even though we grappled, he always held onto me so that I wouldn't get hurt. but nothing like He works himself up into I thought he was going to kill half fought me across the living The odd ball nature of this “free soul” was painstak- ingly delineated for the fans. The testaments, anonymous and otherwise, of those who "know” him, and even the evidence in intra—Hemingway—ish autobiographical prose identified Dean as "a regular little tiger.” East of Eden, as such, was down the drain, but careful mention was made concerning ElEQEe and a specific scene in_Rebel Without a Cause was noted in violent detail. pointing out, eSpecially, the tenacity strength, per— versity. and tenderness of the young star. Even Dean's re- ported dislike of publiCity could be interpreted as a Sign of his sincerity, as well as being a rebellion against authority and convention, even if it was only Hollywood convention that Was involved. Dean's dangerous hobby of sports car racing VHS given Strong attention as a tribute to his daring. Also, because cars, speed, racing were growing increasingly popular With the teen fans, this mention would lend an identification set to the star and to the article. The death prophecy of 90 the unnamed executive, though not intended as fatalistic, was notable in that it appeared but a matter of days before it literally came true. If the private life of James Dean would seem enigmatic, if not inscrutable, his screen performance was as clear as crystal to some of his growing list of fans. A letter from one, published in the August Motion Picture, praised Dean's "consummate artistry”: He merits every superlative in the book. Moreover, he reveals an utterly amazing talent—~far too seldom seen in a newcomer nowadays. He did more than play the role of Cal Trask-~he lived it. He never made a false movef"5 The talented newcomer was, indeed, a rara aVis in Hollywood, and, as such, Dean had to be protected. He was not to lack his apologists. One columnist who had recently taken Dean "over the coals" for tacting up on giang” quoted him as saying: The trouble With me is I'm just dog tired, Everybody hates me and thinks I'm a heel. They say I've gone Hollywood——but, honest, I'm just the same as when I didn't have a dime. As I said, I'm just tired. I went into Gian: after a long hard schedule on Rebel Without a Cause. Maybe I'll just best go away. The columnist's reaction? —-: Let's forget the whole thing. Jimmy. Stick around!66 By September fan magazines were starting to catch up with block—buster articles. Modern Screen unveiled baby pictures and high school yearbook shots, properly annotated. with the article "Smoldering Dynamite":67 ”The life story of 9i the boy who is frankly the most important young man to rock Pkdlywood since Brando hit town," What started as a typical comparison of the immediate post-Eden publicity variety, branched, as now did other later couplings, into the beginnings of a detached image--Dean standing alone—-very alone. "A co-ed who dated Jimmy in 1950 Mmen he was attending Santa Monica Junior College" testified: Jimmy . . . is the most individual young man I ever met. He was the way he is long before Marlon Brando came on the scene. Everything he does is sincere and heartfelt, It is not calculated for effect. Unlike Brando, he is not a shocker. He is gentle. sensitive and masculine. Yes, he“s moody and introverted. Sure, hefis a non-conformist, but he°s very well brought up. . . . A Warner spokesman described him as "a kid who spent his whole life on an Indiana farm, a regular, healthy farm boy with a flair for acting." The distance from Brando was increased With a further comparison. Brando had been reported as saying. ”I became an actor through accident.” Dean was firmly described as an actor "by design”-—who let nothing stand in the way of his dogged determination to succeed in his chosen field. Even when things were difficult, he showed his “independence and self-reliance“ in refusing to ask his family for money during the lean New York days. Poverty may have seemed to deflect him from his purpose, but Dean‘s ambition was enhanced by his determination and luck: Instead he talked himself into a crew—manfis job on a sloop cruising the Atlantic seaboard. To the skipper 92 he confided his acting ambitions, and as luck would have it, the skipper knew a friend who knew a friend. And James Dean wound up in the cast of §e§_£hg ‘Jaguar. A Mrs. Jean Owen, who taught dramatics at Santa ionica Junior College, described Dean‘s approach to his acting as "intense and dedicated”: Those are the two qualities that characterize Jimmy—~excitement and imagination. His approach to problems is unusual. He plunges in head first. Hollywood Stars brought out a direct pitch for Dean‘s forthcoming movie in the article "Rebel With a Cause”:68 Based on the book of the same name, the picture is the story of a group of teenagers who rebel against society. Basically, they are misunderstood children who want love from their parents. Unable to find the love and affection they need, they turn their despair into destructive acts. As a boy caught in a terrible conflict, Jimmy shows a deep penetrating understanding of the character he is scheduled to portray, for in his personal life he is also a rebel, but one with a cause. . . . He is possessed by a drive to become one of the finest actors in the world, and he is determined to accomplish that cause. He will work at anything, consent to anything. if he thinks it will further his goal. The article also mentioned Dean‘s fascination with the skill and grace of the matador and was illustrated with a variety of photographs of Dean doing cape work, noting that "the skills he has develOped in body movement and coordi— nation are invaluable and acquiring them is part of his dedi- cation to his work." The article further developed that fatalistic quotation of Dean‘s, ”an actor‘s course is set even before he's out of the cradle," and concluded that though Dean was an unsatisfied taskmaster, he was ”without the 93 smallest doubt the most promising actor of 1955. . . . If being a rebel helps him to become a better actor, then who is there who has the right to say he should conform?” Film Life was there with the answer in ”The Man Behind the Camera" by Don Allen.69 The article brought in both sides of the coin, mentioning Dean‘s "magnificent performance" but describing his personal attitudes as "moody," "sullen," "uncooperative." Personal characteristics were defined as "rudeness and uncouthness" by an unnamed "top New York writer." A personal incident was summarized with the comment: "He was like a little boy who tries to show off by deliberately using a naughty word in front of company. But this was an adult twenty-four years old": When he thought someone was watching him he slouched and brooded and acted bored. But when no one paid any attention to him, he came alive and seemed keenly inter— ested in everything that was going on around him. Allen contended that it was “inevitable that he be compared with Marlon Brando." The analogy began with Brando‘s acting . . ." the low mumbling of lines, the mannerisms and facial gestures, the calculated understatement . . . and Continued on to include his personal behavior.“ The compari— sons, he said, were "too many and too obvious to have been merely coincidental." Allen noted further that "studio representatives" were a little apprehensive "that Jimmy may have become a one— character actor who does not have a change of pace on the screen." Allen labelled the East of Eden role as a "bad boy 94 type with dirty fingernails",and called the Rebel Without a Cause role "a confused, neurotic juvenile delinquent." The Giant role, said Allen, was "practically a reversal of this," and Dean was said to be giving trouble: George Stevens is having trouble getting exactly what he wants. I've seen him shaking his head many times when Jimmy resorts to the mannerisms he has used in previous pictures. Personally, too, Dean evidently left much to be desired. The article noted criticism from the townspeople of Marfa, Texas, site of the Giant location shooting: ”He used too much dirty language." Even Dean's co—stars would seem to be, if not critical, certainly not positive in attitude. An anonymous reporter who tried to get ”some personal stuff" on Dean from Rock Hudson and Elizabeth Taylor found they "clammed up_ They just sort of shrugged their shoulders." By way of explanation, the article could offer only the fact that even Dean's own father considers him ”a tough hwy to understand," and Allen resorted to a personal analysis Of Dean by an unnamed "top studio executive": ”Jimmy's be— havior is simply a result of shyness, which, in turn, comes from an inferiority complex.” A "well-known star" was also quoted: He popped off when he was in New York about how he was going to get a lot of publicity out here by being obscure, abstract, and hard to know. I don't know ex— actly why. Maybe he was impressed by the Great Garbo 'I want to be alone' technique. Or by Brando's oblique approach to publicity which has been uniquely successful. At this same time a more up—beat and traditional Publicity approach was attempted in Dorothy O‘Leary's 95 "The Littlest Rebel.”70 Obviously a direct plug for the coming [Kan picture, the article stressed Dean‘s aloneness and in- tensity, ascribing them to dedication: ”Jimmy stayed by himself, often retired to his dressing room, where he‘d con- centrate on the next scene, either by studying or listening to classical recordings." The ”I have my personal rebellion" quotation was brought in relating to Brando, and an attempt Mas made to define Dean‘s intellectuality and seriousness of purpose, concluding; "The only real resemblance between Dean and Brando is that they're both truly dedicated actors." An odd yet interesting note was struck with the announcement that "this summer Jimmy will direct friend Leonard Rosenman‘s one act opera 'Capolla the Great‘ at the famed Tanglewood Summer Music Festival." Pictures accompanying the article showed Dean rehearsing his lines with a tape recorder and Playing chess. Another even more typical plug was Lori Nelson's "The Dean I Dated."71 Miss Nelson, who was also a Clayton client and also struggling hard to break out of the "B” category, said of Dean: He's dynamic and deliberate, devilish and direct-- but he's not eccentric. . . . He's just as real and tender and sensitive as he was in the movie. Excite— ment can be a theatrical quality. Warmth isnGt. The article accentuated, specifically, Dean‘s unpre— tentiousness, that he considered Lori Nelson more beautiful in jeans and pigtails than she was in her finest gown-- a comment certain to appeal to the bobby-sox crowd. 96 The same issue of Motion Picture gave two more puffs to Dean.72 Kilgallen's goesip Column noted that Dean was having landlady trouble because he repaired his motorcycle in the bathroom. Erskine Johnson mentioned the "camera wizardry" employed to make Dean, "who‘s shorter by far,“ look as tall as Rock Hudson in Giant. Pictures heralding the forthcoming Rebel had begun to appear in the New York papers,73 an article appeared in the Journal—American,74 and Screenland reiterated a previously released note; Daredevil Dean is hell on wheels. Racing his Porsche in local meets, he wins handily at 120 mph plus, earns the respect of racing pros, but the word around the studio is, 'That crazy kid is going to kill himself.‘75 With still only one picture released to his credit, Dean inspired articles like Ruth Rowland‘s "What Jimmy Dean Did to Hollywood": In one brilliant performance, the belligerent, moody, off-beat ‘character' with nothing of the usual glamour has changed Hollywood and all its concepts of what a young leading man should be . . . it has opened the doors that had once been closed because those who made pictures felt the type was not salable.7o Mrs. Rowland felt that the ”young and brilliant" actor had an unusually “sensitive brooding quality" and this, com- bined with “his fine acting sense," gave him the ”ability to throw himself into the characters of the young killers or neurotic juvenile delinquents he frequently played“--even when she first saw him on television some two years before. Mrs. Rowland commented also about Dean's lack of pub- licity cooperation: "Either he is very shrewd or very honest.“ 97 An interview with "a young actress" convinced her the latter description was true, for "he still carries the deep hurt of those early days." A lead-in in the October Motion Picture called 'fielent or Temperament" used a Dean anecdote for continuity in an article about certain stars who continue to parlay their tempestuous off-screen behavior into box—office popularity. Mentioned were Shelly Winters, Frank Sinatra and Ava Gardner, Robert Mitchum, Mario Lanza, Marilyn Monroe, and, of course, erlon Brando: "Today, Brando, long Hollywood's No. 1 rebel, takes a dim view of his one—time behavior." The conclusion related how, at a party, Brando, "wearing a sincere—type Madison Avenue suit," warned Dean, who was wearing "old clothes and a black shirt," that a motorcycle accident could cost him his career. And, as for bongo drums, ”That was last year's publicity," smirked Brando as evidence of his "new self—discipline." The editors noted that this ”new self— discipline" was "mostly self—imposed." The October issue of Screen Stories featured the Dean film East of Eden: "He was cruel and wild because he knew his father hated him——the story of a boy's search for love."77 Imogene Collins wrote an article on the Clayton—engineered Dean—Lili Kardell romance entitled "The Secret Love That These Haunts Jimmy Dean"78 for the October Modern Screen. and other articles must have been on the stands when the news 98 came. .All the news services rattled articles off the wires: INS: Giant Star Dies in Crash—~Tragic auto crash death of brilliant young actor James Dean-—The actor, who was forbidden by his studio to indulge his passion for racing while working, just completed a starring role in Edna Ferber's Texas opus Giant and was on his way to Salinas to compete in a sports car race.79 Even in death came the inevitable comparisons to Brando: Many compared him to Marlon Brando and concurred that his death ended what might have been “one of the great talents' of the theatre.80 Also present were the romantic notes, for, as re- ported: None mourned his death more than his ex—sweetheart Ursula Andress, who wept hysterically and blamed herself for the actor's death declaring she wished she hadn't ‘broken off' their romance a few weeks ago. She cried, 'I tried to understand him, but I just couldn‘t make it work.‘Bl Ironically, the same Ursula Andress was publicized as figuring strongly in the divorce proceedings of actor John Derek, initiated at the time of Dean‘s death.82 She shortly became Mrs. Derek. The UP release was labeled "Movie World Mourns Actor Dean” in Chicago's Sun—Times.83 Called ”Hollywood's newest bobby-sox Idol," Dean was described as "often moody and shy,” dressed in "blue jeans and T-shirts," having ”taken over Mmere Marlon Brando left off . . . he had an extraordinary talent." AP termed him "a brilliant young motion picture actor and sports Car racing enthusiast." He "flashed on the movie 99 lxmizon with the same intensity as Marlon Brando, with whom "54 The Chicago Tribune iced the front he was often compared. page release with a photo of Dean holding some of his racing trOphies. The Sun—Times release recalled Dean as the "surly, he was often lmooding Caleb of the movie East of Eden compared to Marlon Brando."85 The Chicago DailyjNews AP release added that Dean had a "love for fast cars and motor- cycles" and "had been a constant worry to his studio. The Emily News also added the ironic note that the photo showing Dean on a date with Ursula Andress as printed in the issue‘s roto section "went to press before Dean was killed.”85 A later AP release in the Sun—Times called Dean "a sensitive young actor . . . who could well become Hollywood‘s first posthumous Academy Award winner": Not since the screen debut of Marlon Brando had any actor made such a bow as had Dean in East of Eden. . . . Many critics tabbed it the male Oscar performance to beat.87 This release mentioned that though Dean "was con— sidered eccentric by some outsiders," his death came as a stunning blow when announced at the "Deb Star” ball. Others in Hollywood, too, felt the loss. Director George Stevens was quoted: Long before the movies or anyone else in Hollywood had heard of Dean, I saw him in a half—hour television It was the first time that I ever watched anxious— play. ly for the credits so I could find out who this brilliant, sensitive young actor was. His was an extraordinary talent.88 100 Chicago's American used an INS release labeled "Brando Tells Actor's Rush-—Dean‘s Premonition of Tragedy Told": Brilliant young movie actor James Dean streaked through life like a runaway rocket because he felt there was not enough time, he always had to hurry. And he was right. Friends reported today he once told his fellow actor Marlon Brando, 'I've just got to go places in a hurry. There just isn't enough time.‘89 The release noted in closing that Dean as the "surly Caleb in East of Eden displayed the same naturalistic acting talent that made Brando a sensation." Another gambit on the same theme appeared in a local 3 Chicago column the same day: The unfortunate fate of movie star James Dean was prophesied, unknowingly, of course, by Marlon Brando. We visited Brando last Spring while he was making Guys and Dolls in Hollywood. The conversation turned to Dean, who was known as a 'Young Brando.’ 'I told that crazy kid to stop driving those motorcycles and Sports cars or he‘d kill himself,‘ Brando said. ‘Know what he said to me?' ‘If it was good enough for you, it's good enough for me.‘90 Hedda Hopper's daily syndicated column exclaimed that she was "still reeling" over the loss of "one of the greatest acting talents I‘ve ever known": a tragic figure; so few understood him. He was such out for love and understanding but got He was reaching so little.81 Miss Hopper recalled Dean's interest in acting, eSpecially the role of Hamlet. "It should be done only by a young man," he said. She added, "He had a sure instinct for drama." Miss Hopper sadly noted the lack of effect of the 101 St.(fimistopher medal Dean owned, a gift from Pier Angeli. Louella Parsons backed away, she said, from the endogizing "most of Hollywood" would apply to Dean for “his acting brilliance": What I remember most about him was the little boy quality, shining forth at you from behind those thick glasses of his, tearing at your heart. He had that extreme and touching idealism of youth which made you wish that he would never have to be dis— illusioned. Now he won't be. He leaves behind his two films in which he proved that his distinctive magical performances in East of Eden was not merely a flash. In both Rebel Without a Cause and Giants [sic.] I understand he far surpasses his first movie performance which made him an overnight star. In fact, it isn‘t hard to find many people in Hollywood who feel, given the years, Jimmy would have surpassed Marlon Brando, with whom he was so often com- pared. This is a most tragic loss. 92 Columnists continued to milk the untimely death for all it was worth, linking Dean's name with other stars, star- lets, productions, and publications, providing ready publicity finiall. Sammy Davis publicly lamented the death in Walter Winchell's column, thanking Winchell for his sage counsel to "Take it easy!"93 Ursula Andress is quoted as telling friends "a few days before" Dean‘s "tragic" death: "I know we love each other because we fight all the time."94 Irv Kupcinet cited the irony behind the statistic that though Dean had Mmrked earlier as a backstage assistant on"The Hallmark Hall Of Famef'next month he was scheduled to return to"The Hall of Fame"as star of The Corn Is Green.95 Walter Winchell em— Ployed irony, too, in: 102 In the October Modern Screen question and answer page: 'Warner Bros., I am told, objects strenuously to James Dean‘s auto racing. Does he plan to give it up?‘ S. J. El Paso. Answer: No! In Screenland Dean is quoted, ‘My days of fun are over!‘98 Iouella Parsons noted now that Dean was "to have had the starring role in E. Hemingway‘s story ‘The Battler.“ [firector Arthur Penn chose Dewey Martin to replace him.“97 Emeilah Graham mentioned that Henry Ginsberg flew out to attend the funeral of Dean and to represent the Giant company, which Mas shut down waiting for Liz Taylor to get well.98 And WaUXX'Winchell devoted an entire column to Hollywood tragedies (Robert Walker, Valentino, Harlow, Lombard), using Dean‘s death as a springboard to florid prose: Black headlines extinguish the shimmer of a star and millions are saddened. James Dean's journey into the shadows is replete with dark ironies common to tragedies. There is reason to believe his reckless hobbies were motivated by the grandest emotion--love. Dean had been lugging the torch for over a year. The fiery burden com— pelled him to seek escape and challenge death in speeding vehicles. First it was motorcycles——then racing cars. Dean had struggled for years. He literally starved or toiled as a busboy while searching for acting jobs. He did walknon and bit parts on TV. Then he won a small role in The Immoralist on Broadway and attracted Holly- wood‘s attention. Suddenly his ambition was fulfilled and stardom was a reality. And suddenly it ended with a Sickening crash.99 Sheilah Graham now revealed that Elizabeth Taylor‘s COIIapse followed the news of the death of her Giant co—star, 0 Dorothy hinting secret and deep intimacy of feeling.10 Kilgallen thought it safe to release the news that John Derek waS "consoling" Ursula Andress.101 Other news revelations in— cluded the announcement via AP that Dean had received a Speed— ing ticket less than two hours before his fatal crash.102 103 After the "news" articles came still more tributes. Joeffiems said in "This Is Hollywood": Mr. Dean was a brilliant and shy young man tormented with many personal problems. Cars were not a symbol to him of a fast life; they were a symbol of rebellion against routine and a release from an unhappy life . . . [He] never felt more complete than at the wheel of a speeding car.103 104 and Newsweek105 both carried obituaries, and 11.339. on October 9th, the news services gave notice of his burial ‘fln a quiet country cemetery" as "a crowd estimated at 5,000 mulled quietly as final services were read."106 Ironically, the New York Sunday News on the day of his funeral carried a publicity photo of Rock Hudson and Dean "Learning the Ropes" on the set of Giant.107 Miss Kilgallen continued her personal plunge into Dean lore by noting: It's never happened that a posthumous Academy Award has been given an actor, but Hollywood insiders expect the precedent to be set in the case of James Dean, killed in that wild auto crash. They believe his performance in Rebel Without a Cause will win him an Oscar even though he's dead.108 The "wildness" of the crash seems substantiated by a later Kilgallen column in which she noted that "a half an hour before“ the crash Dean had indulged himself in "a chal— lenge race on the road" with Lance Reventlow, son Of heiress Barbara Hutton.109 Mentions of a possible Oscar for Dean were to be re— Peated throughout the next several years, by various people, on various occasions, and, probably, for various reasons. 104 vmat was an Oscar performance at the time of Dean”s death, andrmmed as such, was his performance in East of Eden, then hicirculation. Miss Kilgallen mentioned a possible Oscar RH'Dean's performance in Rebel Without a Cause, which was abmnzto be released. In the months and the years to come, the Oscar possibility was also to be connected to Dean's work ggagg. Probably no cinema award has as much prestige in the meican public mind as has the Oscar awarded by the Motion Idcture Academy. To say a Dean performance would merit such miaward is ostensibly a compliment to his performance. To keep saying it, and keep saying it over a period of years lendstx>such remarks a connotation that they may be made, also, to excite interest and suSpense——nor could they in any waY'damage box office receipts. At this point, and in the light of the raves to come, it might be worth mentioning that Dean never did win an Oscar. Almost immediately after Miss Kilgallen‘s remarks, ,&§§fl.Without a Cause was released. Stewart Stern, a young screen writer, wrote the script fin Rebel Without a Cause. A discussion of the work and events to the point at which Mr. Stern entered the scene has eventually written and published by Nicholas Ray, the director of the film, and will be discussed later at the time aI9pr0Priate to the publishing date. It might be more reward— lng now to examine Dean's influence on his screen writer in 105 11m creation of a role written expressly for him. Despite flxzfact the title is from a well-known psychological study lnrRobert Lindner, the characters and the plot are originals: screenplay by Stewart Stern from an idea by Nicholas Ray. Mr. Stern counts himself among the handful of Dean's 'Tmst friends" in Hollywood. Stern described Dean as: Mischievous, hearty, trying to get all he could out of life. He had a superficial knowledge of many things. many subjects, careening from interest to interest, never going into anything very deeply, but usinglét for all it was worth at the time-—and in the future. Years before, Stewart Stern had worked with a theatre reading group in New York. He wanted Dean for a role, for rmmhing, and was advised to call Dean up and ask——but warned, "He's a good actor, but watch out . . . completely unpredict— ablefl' Stern called Dean and suggested that if he weren‘t cknng anything, he might come down and read. He met with an afflhmative if mumbled answer——"But, even then," said Stern. "I knew he wouldnft show up.” According to Stern, when they met again in Hollywood, Daniasked Stern to go to a film with him. Stern declined, tmt when Dean called a week later and asked again, the invi— tation'was accepted. It was a second West Coast Premiere of W: Barroom . . . Cinemasc0pe . . . East of Eden . . BDd I found the little guy sitting next to me had power as an actor-—and as a mimic. We sat by the hour talking about animals, imitating them. Jimmy could do it per— feCtly. Once at a showing of Prince of Players, Jim Backus was sitting with his wife Henny in back of us. I noted it to Jimmy, and a few seconds later, he 106 laughed, "That's rich!" in the Magoo voice. I looked over and there was Backus, standing up and looking around for his imitator. It's this sort of thing we worked into Rebel—~points where his personality and mine met and meshed. There was frustration, yes, but also a gentleness, a warmth considered by society as unmanly. Among Dean‘s Hollywood friends was a young actor, con- sidered "effeminate." Jimmy sort of played the mother—hen role to him, wanted very much to get him into Rebel in the part of Plato. Dean and his friend made a test together for Rebel, in a scene which was cut from the later script, but omuured after the "chickie-run.“ The scene included a siege oflnsterical laughter, much as some people might react to tragedy. The friend wasn‘t sure he could laugh. They were iming the old Streetcar set for the test. According to Stern Jimmy took his friend behind the set and he was peeing, seeing hmntmgh he could make it go, trying to make it go over the mfi;and into the camera. The result brought forth, of course, Nude of laughter, and they were ready to shoot. Though the test went well, the young actor's immediate career did not, at least not in this particular role. He did 'end up in the picture playing a minor role, but, according to Stern: I wanted the role to have homosexual overtones--but he was too much. Plato was young, yes, and searching for warmth, but he would have been too much. Stern found that Dean‘s sensitivity was intermeshed Math his interest in his own personal well being. According to Stern until that last year, Dean had no conception of what 107 (NTMmO he was. The tremendous acclaim he had as an actor Mes lost in his great fear-—finding his place in the world. Dithat last year he went to a psychiatrist. Stern felt that :UfDean had lived to continue his therapy, this might all have baniresolved for him in his own mind. In terms of the Dean personality used in Rebel and in the scenario of The James Dean Story, which was written later, Ekern said he regarded Jimmy as a part of a progression in the Williams—Inge concept of the BOY-MAN who looks and acts like a man, but is ruled by a woman——a comment on the role of the sexes in our society; Rebel Without a Cause opened in New York City on (kmober 29, 1955. Unlike East of Eden, it did not seem to fave had a carefully prepared-for opening. There were no lengthy previews and try-out runs; even the exhibitor reviewer tad only days before the public opening of the film to see it and assess it. The haste would seem to point out that Warner Thus. was edgy about the commercial success of the film. Though a Cinemascope production and in color, Rebel could hardly he considered a Class A film. With mostly contract stars, a relatively little known director, an original story, James Dean was about the only selling point the film had. With Dean killed so recently, to issue the film at once would be tmzardous--to wait might be fatal. The film was released. 108 Demiues the only big star in the film, and the film was therefore sold on that basis. The Press Books illustrating posters and story lines fin Rebel Without a Cause ran twenty tabloid pages.111 The rmfior posters and neWSpaper advertisements featured Dean in easeries of Specially posed shots and stills from the film. The lead poster asserted: "Warner Brothers put all Huaforce of the screen into a challenging drama of today's txenagers."‘ About 2/5 of the entire advertisement was a smxho shot of Dean in his red jacket and tight blue jeans. Tauxlfrom the half—rear, the face looking over the shoulder :nia serious expression, the hands in the back hip—pockets, Unapicture had a mock sensuality--almost a parody of the fmmnm WWII back shot of Betty Grable. The picture was labeled, “Jim Stark——a kid in the year 1955-—what makes him tidclike a bomb?" Credits listed "James Dean" in letters as large as those of the title; Natalie Wood, the co—star, got less than half—size lettering, Sal Mineo, a little more than half that, and featured players, director, etc., even less. Armxfiismaller picture framing the credits showed Dean pro— tmfijhg Natalie Wood: ". . . and they both come from 'good families!‘" A similar poster—ad used half of the Space for a long, flfllrfront, full figure of Dean, still in the same costume, 1figs crossed, hand on hip, holding a cigarette, with the same stern look. The credits and wording of the previous 109 amuntisement were repeated, but a somewhat different pose :flfDean with Wood was used. Their hands are clasped as they stmxiat a distance from each other. The remaining Space wastaken by a still from the knife-fight scene, labeled: "flmareception committee for the new kid on the block." Ondously, the switch-blade knives, which dominate the screen hithe film, have been blocked out, giving the impression lflmt the clenched fists are just that and only that. A variation using the front shot declared: "This kid lmm a chip on BREE shoulders. He's Jim Stark, teenager who tflunks he has to be bad to make good!" An added three-shot hithis "challenging drama of today's juvenile violence" suggested: WMaYbe the police should have picked up the parents instead." A variation of the back Shot was labeled, "The talk iSjfive, the walk is swagger. You join a gang. AND A TEEN WAR STARTS!" Further variations, all accenting the Dean face, figure and name were labeled: A portrayal of surpassing impact-~the story of a teenage kid caught in the undertow of today's juvenile violence. This kid makes a date——and a teen war starts. Real and overpowering! Warner Bros. Challenging Drama of Teenage Violence! Their families gave them everything—~but a good example. 110 He was new on the block, the pretty girl belonged to the leader of the gang, and the leader of the gang called him 'chicken' to his face. . . . This is the way a teen war starts! Stills from the film were featured in advertisements ckmlaring, "These kids are playing 'Cops and Robbers' with realcops!" and "Look, Ma! No handcuffs——YET!" Perhaps the most bizarre advertisement, showing Dean mxiNatalie Wood clasping hands at a distance and used Ineviously to display a tender, romantic moment. was now cap- tioned: Do you know why she just rubbed a little dirt in his hand? There's a terrifying reason behind this teenage custom. It's not a ritual from 10,000 years ago or 10,000 miles away. It happens today . . . next door. In prepared newspaper copy, Dean figured as the star hia.picture at the same studio "where he made his sensational debut in East of Eden": His first motion picture bore out the promise of stardom predicted by Kazan. In Rebel Without a Cause Dean reportedly repeats the success he scored in East of Eden. The part is said to be as dramatic as the role Dean played in East of Eden. The film was also to be touted as the "romantic" damn of former child star Natalie Wood. She seemed duly grateful: After seeing Mr. Dean in East of Eden, Natalie re— calls, ‘I went home and prayed that I could work with him some day.‘ Perhaps as an appeal to a somewhat different public, exhflntors were asked to also note the authenticity of the 111 Immerial, the eight months of "research" in preparing the fihn. To further sell the film they were advised: Sneak previews and advance screenings prove that Rebel Without a Cause creates excitement through word of mouth. That kind of stimulation can be provoked in your town. Invite local educators, parents' groups, law officials, newspaper, radio and TV opinion makers, civic officials, social workers to an advance showing. As was the case with East of Eden, publicity lapel rflflwns, wall banners, etc. featuring Dean's name prominently Imme available. In all stills released for advertising, Dears was the dominant figure. Although the advertising campaign, as stated, was («mked out preceding Dean's death and made no overt play on tfimt fact, the concentration of advertising attention on Dean mathe central and heroic figure, the play on the general image "mate bad to make good," etc., the immediateness of the Enemiere, as well as the immediacy of the Dean presence on the screen~~and all so soon after his death-—were to reap (hyidends, literally, for Warner Bros. In the course of time, the picture grossed almost as much as East of Eden. Rebel Without a Cause112 (Not for publication) A man, beaten up by some teen age toughs, is left lying unconscious in the street. Jim (JAMES DEAN), an unruly youth questioned by the police, is released for lack of evidence, but not before revealing a disrespect for his domineering mother (ANN DORAN) and weakling father (JIM BACKUS). With Judy (NATALIE WOOD), a girl friend, and his pal Plato (SAL MINEO), Jim tries to join a gang led by Buzz (COREY ALLEN). Instead, Jim and Buzz wind uP fighting a knife duel and agree to meet later for a test whereby the boys each get into a hot rod, drive the 112 cars toward the edge of a cliff and leap out seconds before the vehicles tumble to the jagged rocks below. Both boys racing at breakneck speed, the Cliff's edge looming ahead, Buzz reaches for the door, but his jacket sleeve hooks over the handle. Trapped, he and the car spin through the air to a violent death below. Fearing Jim will go to the police, Buzz's friends track him to a deserted mansion where he, Judy and Plato, armed with his father's gun, are hiding out. Plato opens fire, killing one of the youths. Summoned by the shots, police close in and order the gun—crazed youngster to surrender. Plato makes a furtive move mistaken by a policeman who fires at him. Jim, saddened by his buddy's death, is comforted by his parents. From this experience, they have come to understand one another. There is no running time listed. As an "authentic" picture of juvenile violence, BQxfl.Without a Cause is something more and something less. Acnmiously uneven film, it tends to be rather gothic in Stlllle. As an example, the opening shot in the film has a mniously stark and moving——yet vaguely ambiguous-—quality. The opening scenes of the original scenario were addently cut, probably as being too violent. The gang beat- inSupthe man is never shown. Originally, the man, carrying Exme packages, is accosted, beaten, his packages falling into Umagutter. Among the packages are toys, evidently for his duldren. None of this is shown in the film as released. Instead, under the title and credits, is a single QNOUnd level shot of a deserted street and gutter. A mechanical ‘UHVmonkey playing tiny hand cymbals is clattering away in the foreground. A drunken Jim Stark reels into the shot, looks 115 at the toy, and flops down on his stomach for a better View. Tenderly, he turns the toy on its side, blankets it with a piece of wrapping paper, and cuddles beside it, his hands between his thighs, his legs drawn up in an almost fetal position. The sound of sirens comes up in the background, and a break is made to the scene in the police station. The opening scene, as presented, is arresting——but without the context of the beating, leaves many questions unanswered, including the reference to the beating in the later dialogue. In or out of context, this first view of Jim Stark as drunken and infantile, alone, is in emphatic contrast to the strength he seems to build to heroic proportions as the PiCture progresses. Indeed, the story has an almost mythic quality, with Jim and the kids against the rest of the world. The parents, the cops, the teachers are, without exception. if not actually threatening, useless—-or, even worse, ridiculous. The picture centers on Jim Stark, the hero, and his relationships with his parents and with his peers. Thrust between the Spineless cajoleries of his father (played by an eX-comedian) and the biting tongue of his mother, he can Olily scream, "You're tearing me apart, " and bury his head in his coat as his parents publicly argue over which one of them is to blame that he was arrested. Jim calls his home life a "zoo," a "circus." He says, " If I had one day when I didn't have to be all confused and didn't have to feel that 114 Ives ashamed of everything-—that I belong someplace. . . ." Hecxiticizes especially his father's attitude: He always wants to be my pal. How can I give him anything? I don't know what to do anymore, except maybe die. She eats him alive and he takes it. I don't ever want to be like him . . . 'chicken' . . . If he had the guts to knock Mom cold once! The juvenile officer, Ray, asserts people can succeed higrowing up in such an atmOSphere but invites Jim to "come hm shoot the breeze" whenever he feels like it. Ray, un- fintunately, is not around when the chips are down. Jim Immt turn to his peers. And they have their own problems. Jim's situation is mirrored in the.familial relation— anB of Plato and Judy, and though the particular situations areenmreme and the individual reactions equally so, the pkxure, in a sense, attempts to delineate the general position Ofthe teen ager in modern society——alone and abandoned, left tolnneelf to search out values for himself in a world that dmfld disintegrate at any moment. At one point Judy's father says with dismay that he sunny doesn't understand the situation. His wife consoles tun1with, "It's the age!" For a teenager, nothing seems to Wbright. Judy's younger brother has yet another answer. Raiding his spark-throwing toy Tommy—gun, he shrieks, "It's the Atomic Age! " V After the apocalyptic planetarium scene, awesome muidevastating in its depiction of the end of the world-- ‘Ubshow the pettiness of man and his problems, Plato remarks 115 Ofthe lecturer with almost existential authority, "What does hgquwzabout Man, Alone?" The romantic interest is carried by Natalie Wood as Judy. Jim has already seen Judy at the police station; she hmiteen picked up on the streets at 1 A.M. in a red dress amiuearing too much make—up. She feels her father rejects her. The first romantic scene has been praised photo— gnaphically by Charles Barr: In Rebel Without a Cause a shot of extraordinary beauty comes after the first twenty minutes of the film, during which the surroundings have been uniformly cramped and depressing, the images physically cluttered up and dominated by blacks and brown. Now James Dean is about to set out for school; he looks out the window. He recog- nizes a girl walking past in the distance. Cut to the first day/exterior Shot, the first bright one, the first horizontal one. A close shot of Natalie Wood in a light green cardigan against a background of green bushes. As she walks, the camera moves laterally with her. This makes a direct sensual impression which gives us an in— sight into Dean's experience, while at the same time rev maining completely natural and unforced. Idotorially, the scene is like something out of Our Town. The dialogue is another matter. Jim makes an obvious Eflay for the girl, mentioning their first meeting, to be cmnmered with the rebuff, "Well, stop the world!" To show lumrbright and witty hg_can be, he comes back with the re— runder, "Life can be beautiful!"-—to be met with, "Who lives!" mmia sarcastic, "You wanna carry my books?" Judy's hot—rod leather jacketed friends drive by to pick her up. Her 'eteady" looks like Marlon Brando, and as they stop the car, 116 lmzyells for "Stella—a—a-a!" Judy looks at Jim and says, ‘Jibet you're a real yo—yo!" He counters, "I love you, too." Nuascene in dialogue is almost a parody of Our Town, with cwertones of A Streetcar Named Desire, but it is modern, and it is surprisingly valid. Youngsters the nation over were to see and recognize Ummmelves and their friends in the forced and almost cynical smnnr faire of Jim and Judy. If the adults were overdrawn, Umateenagers seemed recognizable enough, and, after all, Uwaadults.were the villains. One might say that Rebel derived aigood deal of its power and force from the fact that it did Eggshow an adult's conception of the teenager——shy, pimply, awkward and fumbling——as had so many earlier films. The early films were made for adults and adults were presented with an image of the teenager which would satisfy Eh§m_most. With the changing audience of the Fifties, some movie makers began 'Uirealize and recognize the changing nature of their depleted 1mm younger audience. Rebel Without a Cause was probably one dfthe first films to cater deliberately to that younger mxhence in that it presented a picture of the teenager as the teenagers see themselves~—or, more importantly—-as they think of themselves. Rebel established here a leitmotif used dmnmless times since in almost any picture aimed at the teen— age trade. Teenage attitudes expressed toward adult authority miSht be summed up in the scene just after the knife-fight. Ziplanetarium employee and a guard come to break things up. 117 A member of the gang suggests "cutting out." "What for, " Buzz asks, "a couple of old poop—heads?" When authority ap— proaches, the girls sarcastically pinch his cheeks, and one Of the boys grabs his visored hat, and in imitation German, a pseudo—Adolph Hitler, screams, "Achtung! Achtung! Ve vas chust cutting oudt! " Authority, even in its mildest form, is equated with Nazi-ism. The.example of the adult attitude toward the teens is most pointed in the parental relationships depicted, but a vignette midway through the picture presents. its point also. When the milling. student crowd presses toward theplanetarium door, a pinched, old—maidish school teacher starts to yell, “May I have your attention? May I have your attention?" Ignored, she petulantly declares, "Oh, what the heck! " The scene never fails to get a laugh. Dean had ample opportunity in the film to display his mimic talents. The animal sounds of a bull in the planetarium, a cat in the old mansion, even a forced accent and the Mr. Magoo imitation found their way into the film. The integrity and sincerity, the tenderness Stewart Stern recognized and knew, all found their way into the script. Jim Stark's other friend, John Crawford, called Plato, is even more disturbed than Judy. The product of a divorced home, Plato's only overseer is a Negro housekeeper. He is in the police station in the opening scene because he shot some Puppies~—and he keeps a photograph of Alan Ladd in his school 118 locker- His comment to Judy about Jim: "My best friend! You have to get to know him. He's Sincere. He doesn't say much, but when he does, you know he means it." James.Dean was playing a role with which he could identify. .He was-doing the things he could do best, knew best. His performance. gained an added .ease and authority it might not haveotherwise had. Moreover, from what Dean's fans knew of his. life, and what they considered. to be his attitudes-- what they. found. out from the various publicity. media—~they could. readmore- into the delivery of the lines, the impact of the situations, by identifying the character with the man. Even Dean's unexpected, unplanned for death gave new mean— ing and biting irony to some of the lines. Witness Jim's remarks to Judy in seeking her acceptance: "I didn't chicken. You saw when I jumped. What do I have to do? Kill myself? This morning . . . first thing when I saw you . . . I said to myself, 'Live it up! Tomorrow you'll be nothing! "' When Jim later invites Judy to the deserted mansion, "Wanna go up there with me? You can trust me! "—vShe does. Plato follows them, and the three of them "play house." After lullabying Plato to sleep, Jim and Judy set off to "explore.“ There follows the big love scene. Jim is lying down, Judy next to him. Her chin seems to be resting about on his nose. She nuzzles him, talking against his face. His eyes are almost closed. He is in profile; her face is in 5/4 above and dominating his in large Close Up: .Judye.fli! Jim: Hi! Judy: Is this what it's like to love somebody? Jim: I don't know. Judy: What kind of person do you think a girl wants? Jim: A man! Judy: Yes, but a man who can be gentle and sweet. Jim: Yeah. Judy: Like you are . . . and someone who doesn't run away when you want them . . . like being Plato‘s friend when nobody else liked him. That's being. strong! ' Jim: I'm not going to be lonely anymore . . . ever . . . ever! Not you or me! Judy: I love somebody. All this time I've been looking for somebody to love me, and now I love somebody. Why is it easy now? I love you, Jim. I really mean it. His lips part slightly, he slowly turns his head-—to axmmy Slow kiss. She still dominates him. The character of Jim Stark-—How handy when last names (WHE seldom used——could easily be equated with Jim Dean as Ins public knew him. Jim Stark could be every girl's dream kwer. He was there. No demands, he was just there. "Strong" ami"sincere," he was something less than a lover—-but then, lovers are, or can be, dangerous. This was safe. But Jim fixuk was only a character. James Dean was a person. And .kmes Dean was dead. All of the attributes ascribed to the cxmracter Jim Stark had become fixed as part of the character QfJames Dean. And because in death he was equally remote as lfis character counterpart, James Dean was to become the dream lover, the idol of a generation. Newspaper reviews, like Wanda Hale's,114 were generally unment to remark about the "fine, sensitive performance" by 120 the "late—lamented" James Dean in "a role similar" to his earlier success in East of Eden. AS will be noted, almost all of the later reviews took into direct account, in greater and less degree, Dean's recent demise. How much of an effect Dean's death had on the reviews must be pure con— jecture; yet, it is surprising how many reviewers tended to accept the picture as a whole on the basis of their particular conception of the authority of the Dean performance. The peculiarities of fan magazine publishing lags already noted, it was not unusual to find stories, puffs, pictures, etc. featured in fan magazinesdated months after Dean's death Speaking of him as if he were still alive. figllywood Romances noted' Warner Bros. "having fits" over his racing, adding that "he's due to be drafted any day now."115 Movie Life carried the article "Daffy Over Dean, "116 Screen 5.1.1332 lists his name and statistics among their "New Faces," labeling him a "character."117 Hedda HOpper, a strong sup- porter, rushed to his defense, though late, with: "Dean, a highly emotional guy, likes to be wanted, and some people connected with this picture [Giant] treated him like a step- child."lla Photoplay featured an article by Natalie Wood, Dean's co—star in Rebel Without a Cause, entitled "You Haven‘t Heard the Half About Jimmy":“‘9 "Eden made Jimmy into a juvenile delinquent. I shudder to think what Rebel Without 1.912%}; is going to do." Miss Wood recounted Dean's "happy 121 childhood," told of his "first break," getting the job as a crewman on a sloop where "the skipper knew someone who knew someone." Also recounted were anecdotes concerning Miss Wood's TV work with Dean, "my first adult role," and, most especially, the work on Rebel. "Charm and intelligence” were Miss Wood's keynote phrases: "Jimmy Dean's too busy living to sulk." Movie Life Yearbook_#21,120 also on the stands, gave Dean a full pageas "this year's hottest new star": "He scarcely resembles the common variety of movie idol. In fact, you might say he does everything in his power to de different." Listed were... his immediate objective: to play Hamlet on Broadway; and his big goal: to step into the director's shoes of his idol, Elia Kazan. Hollywood Life Stories featured a biography of Dean entitled "Melancholy Genius ":121 "Jimmy Dean is an actor who creates controversy." The article told of Dean's non—appear— ance at the Eden opening in New York, because he was "allergic to both criticism and praise"; the Brando comparisons were brought in, and the article purported to explain Dean's character "in terms of his past, and the fact that he was uprooted from a happy home before he was able to cope with itJ' It went on to tell of the loss of Dean's parents, through death and the resulting fosterage, the early dramatic and athletic success in high school, the hard New York years ("The skipper had a friend who was a producer, a good friend") , 122 theifier Angeli loss, including waiting outside the church: Proud and defiant and essentially lonely despite his frequent dates, he prefers to keep his distance from people and is plagued by a restlessness that he buries.in dozens of hobbies. Certain other Dean mentions at this same time took Duo full account his recent death, capitalizing on it. Time LmedIUs picture with their review of Rebel. The picture was cmflfioned "A Kid Was Killed” and the copy lamented the loss of miactor with such "unusual sensibility and charm."12? They unmidered his performance "the best thing about the film." JmICOOk, Hollywood correspondent for the New York Post, mmnjoned the hangman's noose in Dean's apartment in his euticle on "Hollywood Tragedies."123 Sanford Roth's "The Late James Dean" in Colliers,124 wmslarded with on—the—set shots of Giant (Roth was an 'tfificial" photographer). Roth recalled: His death was front page news. But the stories were something more than a tribute to a newcomer whose career stOpped at the edge of greatness. They were also testi— mony to the pressures that today keep youngsters like Jimmy in constant warfare with the status quo. Roth, who was there "when they took Jimmy out of the carfl'eflaborated on the early death of the young star, de- EflCting it as destiny catching up with him, quoting Dean as Saying that if he "lived to 100, there wouldn't be enough time for everything." Hedda Hopper was mistakenly quoted: WWBt I remember most is the little—boy quality shining from henna those thick glasses of his." (That was Louella Parsons!) 123 Evmiin the recounting of Dean's work with Pegot Waring, scukmress friend of Roth's, the thread of pity for unconsum- netaicmeativity ran through the narrative, pity for the boy Mu)loved.animals, playing tricks. Yet, there was a note oftwssible future recognition. Roth pointed out that in the Dean plays the role of "Jett Rink, the yet unreleased.Giant, fan living oil tycoon . . . a part some movie people think maylning Dean the first posthumous Academy Award." The fan magazines started to catch up with events. ‘Mgkmn Screen's tribute featured two Special articles. One (mm called "Appointment With Death" Was his appointment with Death a casual rendezvous, a brutal quirk of fate, or had it been made a long time ago? . . . He was a boy who had been intimate with Death (his mother's). . . .In all his human contacts, he was unconsciously seeking something he had lost in the years beyond remembering.125 The other article was ”This Was My Friend Jimmy Dean"126 bybflke Connolly. The author said the article was written mule Dean was still alive, and he presented it in the form it was first written. Though there is a "Present—tense" munity about the article as a whole, Connolly prefaced it with pertinent comment: You don't Speak ill of the dead. No one will call him rude and neurotic now; at worst they'll say he was a non-conformist. He was. The body of the article was a strange commentary on mxianalysis of the intellectual and the childish, or at least fluid-like, enthusiasms of Dean. Dean waxed rhapsodic over 124 Entok in recounting the story of the ballet "The Miraculous a story of the search for and the power of love. Renata Tebaldi, Mandarin, Nmmm like SchOnberg, Bach, Claudia Muzio, Jnmue Rodgers (folk Singer of the 30's) popped into the con- wnsation between Connolly and Dean. As Dean was quoted, "MXWLaround you at children and animals. They're always hmking.for and discovering new things. That's what I like UDdO." Connolly said the story had to be a direct account. "Itnfight be.tough.writing it any other way, because it has ." "Jim laughed and said, 'That‘s me a million angles. . tOO-—a million.angles!"' Motion Picture also included a tribute to Dean in its 7 [Mcember issue, coupled with a full page color photo.12 in the same issue was an article crediting Ursula Nearby, Nukess with the break up of the John Derek marriage. There 'The waseflso an advertisement for Rebel Without a Cause. one—sentence paragraphs surveyed Danitribute, in awesome, DemVs unfulfilled future: He died the eternal rebel-—laughing at a world he could not accept—-accepted by a world that loved him. Jimmy, we will not forget! Whereas, before his death Dean was said to consider ' now, it, too, becomes part Ins acting as a "dedication.' Dean wanted to be Oféfllunfulfilled urge toward creativity. a900d actor only for the emotional experience it held: If I can act well enough, I want to direct. After that I'll tackle what I think is the toughest of all But I'm afraid of that one. professions, writing. 125 The article reported that one "intimate friend," whmiinformed of Jimmy's death, Showed little emotion. He amok his head and said: Don‘t be sad about Jimmy. He wouldn't want it. We'll never know for sure, but I'll bet he died laughing at a world he always thought was out of joint. There's a little of Jimmy Dean in all of us. If you remember that, you'll never forget him. And that, above all, would make him happy. The bi—monthly Movies hadn't yet caught up with Dean's deaUL and Armand Archerd's "Talk of the Town" quoted Edna Bernafls description of Dean: ”A very sweet boy . . . a "128 The same games suffering from success poisoning. ismuys "Movie Memo" reviewed Rebel: Compared to Rebel Without a Cause, Blackboard Jungle was just a mild romp. This story of gang fights, hot rods and deadly pranks would be enough to cause excite— ment without the added attraction of James Dean. Holly- wood‘s best new actor, he's outstanding. . . .129 Movie Life contributed "The Untold Story of James Dears Last Days,”130 concentrating on the dedication of the l©ung actor. The article told of "a plan to bring a branch of Unafamed New York Actors Studio where he got his training tofkfllywood for the benefit of the young players there.” Danrs interest in the theoretical was further expanded to huflude "a view to producing and directing his own films." Ikiconstantly carried about the set what he called his di- rector's notebook, jotting down all the information he could there was racing. where ”a man could be 98t. For relaxation, freefl' The "key," however, lay in Dean's statement, "My fun 126 The road race at Salinas was to be a "last days are over." fling": if only for a few moments, to the fears, And . . to say goodbye, the heavy cares that burdened his shoulders the loneliness of being misunderstood and unloved goodbye.to youth. Goodbye . . . Goodbye. . . . The same issue pictured Dean with Ursula Andress,l3'1 EUeabeth Taylor132 and alone,133 accompanied by weepy gossip column puffs. There was an advertisement134 in the back pages for Unasister publication Movie Stars Parade, which promised an mfiicle with the cryptic and misleading title "Where Jimmy Demitfides and Why." The article actually was about the mmfll home Dean rented Shortly before he died. Because of The its remoteness, it was often described as a ”hideaway. gxmsibily innocent juxtaposition of the title and Dean 5 death gmnapromise of more interesting copy than it really afforded Screen Life called Dean a "Spacegetter."135 Also, he waSEi"loner . . . an introvert. Because of his unhappy dfildhood, he became a "drifter": . . Oh, not in the physical sense, mind you . but mentally. He lived in a little boy's very grown up world of daydreams, of wants, of desires . but until recently, the dreams would end all too swiftly. Set shots of Giant were used to illustrate the four page article—~and at the top of the first page, a black tmrdered insert reads: The shocking news of James Dean's untimely death came as we were going to press. May he rest in peace. 127 Derek Prouse again reviewed the new Dean film in Shflm and Sound.136 Any doubts he may have had about Dean's (neative authority have vanished. He called Jim's relation— mnt>with his parents a "long-standing, basic rot," exclaim— imjthat."only a.superb interpretation could have given this Unitexture of a deeply corrosive, psychic disorder, and Jmmm Dean (whose second film this was) magnificently achieved it": His talent had very early acquired a controlled and highly selective expression, and there is hardly a single miscalculated stress. The eyes, withdrawn and undeceived; the inflections at once relaxed and bitter in their denial Of all expectation; the awkward grace of youth, and the moments of eruptive conviction that somewhere, something is hideously wrong outside himself. Drawn equally to the life of his own generation and to a superior instinctual world of the spirit, he drifts——recoiling on the one hand from the cruelties of the adolescents, on the other from the chains of his parents. The actor movingly captures the conflict in all its multiple evasions, betrayals, sudden giggling release of tension, and agonized deadlock, and achieves a genuinely poetic account of a modern mis- fit. Critic Donald Costello of Today137 found Rebel Without EiCause as "having many qualities of a good movie with a Immure sense of social responsibility"; "less exaggerated than makboard Jungle,” it ”concerns itself, properly, with people rather than sociology." Though the picture tends to "oversimplify a complex pnflflem,“ and Costello carps at trying to make a 24 year old mmllook like a 17 year old boy, he praises the unusual plot must which brings in some interesting psychology with Sol bic.]Mineo's "father-complex" for James Dean. Costello 128 phases the color, the performances-—”but all this pales into reLuuNe.insignificance when faced with the.overwhelming pmxmmce of one James Dean." Considering the fact that in the review of.East of Eden, covering almost a full tabloid pm LiCostello.never.touched once on Dean's performance-~it same somewhat strange that in this particular case he should feelthat."credit is not only due—-but demanded” ,The twoiperformances of James Dean to which we have been exposed.so.far,.in East of Eden and.in Rebel With— out a Cause, have excited me like Lsig.]few have done. Deanis performance here has.heightened the tragedy of his recent death. It has sharpened the knowledge that a great artist has been lost——and this in a world that As I saw again Dean's sensitivity and I felt my enjoyment for one of the last two I was criesnfor.art. charm,.his incredible intensity, mixed with a concurrent sadness, films in which he will appear was slipping by. reminded of how I always dreaded to complete my first reading of a Shakespeare play, realizing that soon they would all be used up, and then that great pleasure of discovery would be closed forever. The closing year brought Dean "news" from the wire An AP release told the results of the services once again. Dean won the Best Actor of the Year Award Audience Awards. .Hlpolls conducted by 8,000 theatre managers Motion picture patrons voted who made twenty Immunations in five categories. bYdirect ballot between October 1, 1954 and September 30, 1955. According to the press release: It was a moving moment when Grace Kelly announced the award at the Beverly Hilton last night. There was stunned silence, then applause, as the audience realized the loss of the brilliant actor, killed at 24 in a highway crash two months ago.138 Though the voting was, by the dates indicated, limited Unreactions to Dean's performance in East of Eden, the picture 129 untially and designedly destined to benefit from the pub- out a Cause: lhfity was the newly released Rebel With After his co-star young Natalie Wood accepted the award, emcee George Murphy asked the crowd to join in a tribute to the late actor. The great names and the lesser lights of Hollywood stood for a moment of silence and there were many wet cheeks. Warner Bros. was quick to make use of the publicity.139 hkecial Ad Headings" were prepared and offered to exhibitors amnnmcing "James Dean's Audience Award for the Best Actor of szYear.” A new ending was added to the regular Warner Bros. gutduction trailer carrying the "James Dean Audience Award Message." These initial stages of the development of the Dean iflfige after his death were unordered, vacillating. But the umknlying themes to be explored, the organizational and d already been experi- cmerational devices to be employed ha approaching the Dean Imnmed with. By accident or design. 1 alive proved successful, eSpecially figure as if he were stil. ifcme could find ambiguous and titillating enough cover Approaching Dean as a symbol of 'Heads" to sell magazines. Ins generation had been touched on. as had the use Of the \Huversal "We." (The Dean audience is approached §_,poto: "Weaue all members of the Dean audience, aren't we? Would The major consideration seemed WMIdeny him this, too?“) Hate to hold the Dean audience by engendering further their fmflings of pity and remorse, feelings already developed as 130 part Of the Dean image while he was still alive, and using these feelings, _e_r_i_ masse, to develop and increase the audience's taste for Dean material until they were "primed" for still further exploitation. i\ (fit?- 11. 12. 15. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. . Kate Cameron, CHAPTER III——NOT§§ That Guy Brando (New York: Literary Inc., 1955), pages are not indicated. "1 Predict These Will Be the Brightest New Stars of '58,“ Lng, January 11, 1955, p. 17. Hedda Hopper, column item, Motion Pictugej February, 1955. Reprinted in The Real James Dean Stogy (Gneenwich, 1956). Connecticut: p. 22. "The Next Successes," Vogue, February 1, 1955, p. 170. Sidney Skolsky, column item, New York Posg, dated February 2, 1955, Drama Collection, New York City Public Library. Erskine Johnson, "Inside Hollywood," Motion Picture, Vol. XLIV, No. 550 (February, 1955), p. 75. Louis Sobol, column item. New York Journal—Americapj dated February 16, 1955. Drama collection, New York City Public Library. column item, New York Daily News, dated 5, Drama Collection, New York City Florence Epstein, Enterprises, Fawcett Publications, Inc., February 20, 195 Public Library. Advertisement, New York Sunday News, dated February 27, 1955, Drama Collection, New York City Public Library. Pictures, New York Journal-Americag_dated March 5, 1955 and March 6, 1955, Drama Collection, New York City Public Library. m and Sup, dated March 6, Picture, New York World—Teleqra 1955, Drama Collection, New York City Public Library. Picture, New York Times, March 6, 1955, Sec- 2, 5. Hedda Hopper, column item, Mption Pictuge, March, 1955. Stogy_(Greenwich, Reprinted in The Real James Dean Connecticut: Fawcett Publications Inc., 1956), p. 22. Louella Parsons, column item, Modern Screen, March. 1955. Reprinted in The Official James Dean Anniversary Book Dell Publishing Company, 1956), p. 45. (New York: Louella Parsons, "James Dean-—New Face With a Future," CosmOpolitan, Vol. CXXXVIII, No. 5, March, 1955, p. 44. V, NO. 2 (March, 1955M "Move Over Marlon." Filmland, Vol. p. 58. [Fragment—~private cOllectionL] Warner Brothers Studio Press Book: East of Eden.' "Moody New Star," Life, March 7, 1955, pp. 125ff. Interview with photographer Dennis Stock, April 25, 1965. 151 20. 26. 27. 28. 29. 50. 51. 52. 55. 54. 55. 56. 57. 58. 59. 40. . Warner Brothers Stud 22. . Kate Cameron, Review 0 . Review of East of Edagy 152 Films for Directors "Theatre for Writers, nt--private col— William Glover, EEicago Tribuga [Fragme Says Kazan," lection]. io Press Book: East of Edea. Dorothy B. Jones, "The Language of Our Time," Eallo, Holly— wood ed- Allen Rivkin and Laura Kerr (New York: Doubleday and Company, Inc., 1962), p. 557. Frank Quinn, Review of East of Edaa, New York Eaily Mirrag, March 10, 1955, p. 55. New York Daily News, f East of Edaa, Drama Collection, New York City dated March 10. 1955. Public Library. an York Journal—Americaa dated March 10, 1955. Drama Collection, New York City Public Library. Whitney Bolton, Telegram and San. Review of East of Edaa,gan York Worla- dated March 11, 1955. Drama Col— lection, New York City Public Library. William Zinsser, Review of East of Eden, an York Herald Tribune, March 20, 1955, p. 22. Bosley Crowther, Review of East of Edaa, New York Times, March 20, 1955, Sec. 2. p. 1. "All Time Top Boxoffice Films," Variety, January 6, 1965, p. 67. Howard Thompson, "Another Dean Hits the Bit League," Sec. 2, p. 5. New York Timaa, March 15. Thomas M. Peyor, "James Dean Confirmed for Role in Giant," New York Timaa, March 17, 1955, p. 28. Louis Sobol, column item, New York Journal-American, dated March 19, 1955. Drama Collection, New York City Public Library. . Robert Kass and Ralph Gerstle, Review of East of Eden, Films in Reviag, Vol. VI, No. 5 (March, 1955). pp. 129ff. Sidney Skolsky, column item, an York Poap, dated March 21, 1955. Drama Collection, New York City Public Library. Sidney Skolsky, column item, an York Poaa, dated March 24, 1955. Drama Collection, New York City Public Library. "Drama Dean's Dish, Not Law," Eew York World—Telegram and Egg, dated March 51, 1955. Drama Collection,1New York City Public Library. Review of East of Eden, Look. Helen Dudas, "Marlon Brando. Compact, April.1955, pp. collection]. April 5. 1955. p. 100. Hollywood's Bad Boy,” 40ff {Fragment——private Charles Denton, "Brute to Genial Actor," Chicago;a_ 1955. p. 12. American, April 4. an York PQaE, dated April 8, Sidney Skolsky, column item, 1955. Drama Collection,New York City Public Library. 42. 45. 44. 45. 46. 47. 48. 49. 50. 51. 52. 55. 54. 55. 56. 57. 58. 59. 60. . Aline.Mosby, "Not a Brando, 155 Claims Dean," an York World— Telegram and Sag, dated April 8, 1955. Louella Parsons, column item, an York Journal-American, dated April 10, 1955. Drama Collection. New York City Public Library. Louella Parsons, column item, New York Journal—American, dated April 14, 1955. Drama Collection,TNew York City Public Library. Sidney Skolsky, column item, New York Post, dated April 16, 1955. Drama Collection,New York City Public Library. Hedda Hopper, column item, Eation Pictuga, May, 1955. Reprinted in The Real James Dean Stogy (Greenwich, Connecticuté- Fawcett Publications, Inc., 1956), . 61. "'Reel' Real Romeo." Film Life, May, 1955. p. 27 [Fragment-- private collection]. Anne Higginbotham, Review of East of Eden, antoplay, May, 1955, p. 17 [Fragment--private collection]. "Schlitz Playhouse of Stars": "The Unlighted Road" (Chicago TV, May 5, 1955). Sidney Skolsky, column item, an York Post, dated May 27, 1955. Drama Collection,New York City Public Library. Donald P. Costello, Review of East of Eden, Epday: Taa Catholic Youth Magazina, Vol. X, No. 9 (June, 1955), p. 14. Laura Owen Miller and Anne Kendall, , Modern Screeaj June. 1955, pp. 57ff [Fragment-—private_collection]. Derek Prouse, Review of East of Edaa. Sight and Sound, Vol. XXV (New Quarterly Series) No. 1 (Summer, 1955) pp. 52ff. Frank Degan, "From T—Shirt to Bow Tie, 1955, pp. 15ff [Fragment--private collection]. Sidney Skolsky [Fragment-—private collection, date approxi— mate]. "Unaccustomed As I Am . . ." [Fragment p. 47 (private collection) date approximate]. Hedda Hopper, column item, Eation Pictuge, June, 1955. Reprinted in Ehe Real James Dean Stogy (Greenwich, Connecticut: Fawcett Publications, Inc., 1956), p. 61. Hedda Hopper, "Youn Men of Hollywood," Coronet, Vol. XXXVIII, No. 6 June, 1955), p. 55. Sidney Skolsky, "Hollywood Is My Beat," New York Post, June 19, 1955, p. 115. Joe Hyams, column item, New York Herald Tribune, dated June 50, 1955. DramarCollection.New York City Public " Screenland, June Library. "James Dean and the High School Richard Dyer MacCann. Kids." Christian Science Monitor. July 12, 1955. Reprinted in Richard Dyer MacCann, Hollywood in Transition (Boston: Houghton Mifflin Co., 1962), pp. 187ff. 61. 62. 65. 64. 65. 66. 67. 68. 69. 70. 71. 72. 75. 74. 75. 76. 77. 78. 79. 80. 81. 154 “A Heart That Stalked in Darkness," Screen Album, August 1955. Reprinted in The Official James Dean Anniversagy Book (New York: Dell Publishing Company, 1956—, pp. 46ff. firagment, pp. 16-17 (private collection) date approxi— mate.] ’ , - > [Fragment, p. 12 (private collection) date approximate.] Richard Moore, "Lone Wolf,“ Epdern Screen, August, 1955. Reprinted in The Official James Dean Anniversary Book (New York: Dell Publishing Company, 1956). pp. 44ff. Fan letter, Motion Picture, Vol. XLIV, No. 556 (August, 1955),;p7714. Dorothy Manners, column item from the American, dated August 4, 1955. New York City Public Library. "Smoldering Dynamite," Photoplay, Vol. XLVIII. No. 5. September, 1955),pp. 59ff. Pinky Todd, "Rebel With a Cause." Eallywood Sta£a_ [Fragment, September, 1955, pp. 28ff, private collection]. "The Man Behind the Camera," Film Life [Fragment, New York Journal—_ Drama Collection, Don Allen, __7 September, 1955. pp. 25ff, private collection]. Dorothy O'Leary, "The Littlest Rebel," Movie Secrets [Fragment, September, 1955, pp. 52ff, private col- lection]. Lori Nelson, "The Dean live Dated," Motion Pictuga, Vol. XLIV, No. 557 (September. 1955), pp. 62ff. Dorothy Kilgallen, "Coast to Coast," Eation Pictuga, September, 1955L p. 14. Erskine Johnson, "Inside Hol 6eptember, 1955L p. 25- dated September 4. 1955. Picture, New York Herald Tribuaey Drama Collection, New York City Public Library. "Stage Struck," New York Journal—Americaa, September 25, lywood," Eation Picture, 1955, p. 19. [Fragment, Egreenlaaa (private collection) date approxi- mate.] Ruth C. Rowland, "What Jimmy Dean Did to Hollywood," September, 1955. Reprinted in Movie Stars ParaQa, lNew York: Ideal Publishing The James Dean Albaa Company, 1956), pp. 20ff. October, 1955. East of Eden synopsis, Screen Storiea, The Official James Dean Anniversary Bogk_(New York: Dell publishing Company, 1956), pp. 4Bff. Imogene Collins, “The Secret Love That Haunts Jimmy Dean," Modern Screaa, October, 1955. Reprinted in 3E3 Official James Dean Anniversary Book (New York: Dell Publishing Company, 1956), p. 47. "Giant Star Dies in Crash," Chicago's Americapj October, 1955, p. 1. Ibid. Ibid. 90. 91. 92. 95. 94. 95. 96. 97. 98. 99. 100. 101. 102. 105. 104. 105. 106. 107. 155 Sheilah Graham, column item, Chicago Dailerews, October 1, 1955, p. 15. "Movie World Mourns Actor Dean," Chicago Sun-Times, October 1, 1955, p. 2. "James Dean, Movie Actor, Dies in Crash," Chicago Tribune, October 1, 1955, p. 1. "James Dean Dead," Chicagg,Sun-Times, October 1, p. 2. "Crash Kills James Dean,” Chicago Daily News, October 1, 1955, p. 1. 'Tndiana Funeral for Actor Dean," ChicagogEgn-Times, October 2, 1955, p. 4. . Ibid. "Brando Tells Actor's Rush,” Chicago's American, October 5, 1955, p. 7. Irv Kupcinet, "Kup's Column," Chicago Sun-Times, October 5. 1955, p. 52. Hedda Hopper, "Looking at Hollywood," Chicago Tribune, October 5, 1955, pt. 5, p. 8. Louella Parson, column item, Chicago's American, October 5, 1955. p. 9. Walter Winchell, column item, Chicago's American, October 5, 1955, p. 19. Ann St. John, "This Is Hollywood," Chicago Sun-Times, October 4, 1955, p. 51. Irv Kupcinet, "Kup's Column," Chicago Sun—Times, October 5. 1955. p. 54. Walter Winchell, column item, Chicago's American. October 6, 1955. p. 29. Louella Parson, column item, 7, 1955, p. 15. Sheilah Graham, column item, 7, 1955, p. 15. Walter Winchell, column item, 7. 1955, p. 19. Sheilah Graham, column item, 8, 1955, p. 15. Dorothy Kilgallen, column item, Chicago's American, October 12, 1955, p. 11. Fragment, LOS Angeles Times, dated October 5, 1955. Drama Collection,New York City Public Library. ”This IS Hollywood," New York Heralaagribune Drama Collectionu*New York City Chicago's American, October Chicago Daily News, October Chicago's American, October Chicago Daily News. October Joe Hyams, dated October 6, 1955. Public Library. Obituary, Time, October 10, 1955, p. 114. Obituary, Newsweek, October 10, 1955, p. 76. "Services for James Dean," New York Times, October 9, 1955, p. 87. Picture, "Learning the Ropes," New York Sunday Neya, Drama Collection. New York City dated October 9, 1955. Public Library. 117. 118. F3. leg. (0 120. 121. 122. 125. 124. 125. 126. 127. 128. 129. 150. . Dorothy Kilgallen, column item, . Dorothy Kilgallen, column item, .J Warner Brothers Studio Press Book: . Ibid. . Charles Barr, "Cinemascope: Before and After," Film . Wanda Hale, 156 Chicago's American, October 20. 1955, p. 55. Chicago's American, October 25, 1955, p. 11. Interview with Stewart Stern, August 8, 1959. Rebel Without a Cause. Quarterly, Vol. XVI, No. 4 (Summer, 1965), p. 10. Review of Rebel Without a Cause [Fragment—— undated. Drama Collection, New York Public Library]. "James Dean," Hollywood Romances, 1955. Reprinted in The Official James Dean Anniversary Book (New York: Dell Publishing Company, 1956)) p. 45. "Daffy About Dean," Movie Life, November, 1955, adver- tised in Movies, Vol. IV, No. 6 (December, 1955),p. 70. "New Faces," Screen Album, November, 1955. Reprinted in The Official James Dean Anniversary Book (New York: Dell Publishing Company, 1956), p. 42. Hedda Hopper, column item, Motion Picture, November, 1955. Reprinted in The Real James Dean Stogy (Greenwich, Connecticut: Fawcett Publications, Inc., 1956), p. 60. "You Haven't Heard the Half About Jimmy." . Natalie Wood, Photoplay, Vol. XLVIII, No. 5 (November, 1955), pp. 55ff. Mayie Life Yearbook #21 (New York: Ideal Publishing Company, 1955), p. 52. "Melancholy Genius," Hollywood Life Stories, 1955. Reprinted in The Official James Dean Anniversarijook Dell Publishing Company, 195677 pp. 58ff. November 28, 1955, p. (New York: ”A Kid Was Killed," Time, Picture, Jim Cook, "Hollywood Tragedies," New York Post, November 28, 1955, p. 4. November Sanford Roth, "The Late James Dean," Colliers, 25, 1955. pp. 62ff. "Appointment With Death," Modern Screen, December, 1955. Reprinted in The Official James Dean Anniversary Book (New York: Dell Publishing Company, 1956), pp. 64ff. Mike Connolly, "This Was My Friend Jimmy Dean," Modern Screen, December, 1955, pp. 50ff. [Fragment—~private collection.] "James Dean," Motion Picture, Vol. XLIV, No. 540 (December,1955£ p. 29. Vol. IV, No. 6. Armand Archerd, "Talk of the Town," Movies, December, 1955, p. 10. 1955, p. 12. "Movie Memo,” Movies, December, "The Untold Story of James Dean's Last Days," Movie Life, Vol. XIX, No. 1 (December, 1955). pp. 10ff. (,N }_\ *— LN (4 F) l 0‘1 (Jo (,fx" H 0.1 O) l‘ 1 (23 ~\) 158. :59. 07? Hi“ (I. )i i7 In.) * “ . Derek Prouse, . Donald Costello, 157 Picture, Movie Life (December, 1955),p. 12. Picture, Movie Life (December, 1955),p. 57. Picture, Movie Life (December, 1955),p. 6. Movie Life, December, 1955, p. 68. 1955 [Fragment—— Advertisement, ”Spacegetter," Screen Life, December, private collection]. Review of Rebel Without a Cause, Sight and Eaund, Vol. XXV, No. 3, (Winter, 1955), p. 61. Review of Rebel Withqat a Causa, Today: The Catholic Youth Magazine, Vol.'XI, No. 5 (December, 1955), pp. 26ff. "Audience Awards,“ New York Post, December 7, 1955, p. 80. Warner Brothers Studio Press Book: Rebel Without a Cause. CHAPTER IV 1956--RESURRECTION AS AN IMAGE: GIANT The ballyhoo of the Modern Screen Silver Cup Awards wmalaunched in print in their January, 1956 issue.1 Such awards given by individual publications were designed to in- cxease Circulation by stimulating fans' interest, and, con— mnrently, served to provide additional publicity for the Dean's co-stars in Giant, Rock Hudson leading film figures. mRiElizabeth Taylor, rated first and third in their respective categories. Dean, himself, was presented with the unique Samuel Achievement Award for 1955: "no Star deserved it IMMC" for “his genius and exciting potential." Photoplay featured its Gold Medal Awards ballot2 in UmaJanuary issue and notably listed Dean's released films, butIUs name was not among those of the stars in the running. lhking.Dean out of the running on the direct ballot was a (wriation of the Modern Screen technique, and, viewed con- jmxtively, might be construed as "official" recognition of Dawns death and its considered resultant and inevitable loss cflfappeal by the motion picture industry. The same issue of Photoplay carried a review of Rebel In'Janet Graves.8 She hesitated at the story line: "Without minmch as a glimpse at any normal, healthy family life. the 158 159 sbmqrpresents an off—balance, relentlessly violent picture." muzshe.praised the star: "A performance of great force and :fire by the late James Dean gives life to this study of un— tmppy youth." She called the Dean performance the "best of the month." Also in Photoplay in January appeared "To James Dean."4 nus poetic elegy by Evelyn H. Hunt, described as a Vermont Emglish teacher, was printed "to represent," said the editors, "Hwasentiment of all of us who feel the loss“ of Dean's Nedraordinary talents”: "The real tragedy of his death is that this boy, so dedicated to his career, will never know Immigreatly he was loved by the people he never knew." Miss Hunt's accompanying explanatory note said, "NO one else'S death has ever affected me in quite the same but I know way . I do not know how many years I have left, I would give half of them to give James Dean back to the world." The poem was only twenty-some lines long, but it was {Minted in large type with a photograph that ran across most dfthe two page Spread, the largest photo in the magazine. The poem began: They tell me you are dead, yet I cannot This night believe the unbelievable: The restless beauty of your mind and heart Will not be quenched within the shallow grave. Continuing in this elegiac Spirit, the poem celebrated the actor's hands (The poetess—contributor wrote in her 140 hater: "He had the most beautiful hands I ever saw."). Ins smile, his eyes, his "guileless grace," his Spirit of 'The valiant and the free"—-and ended with the words: Ham.where are you? Oh, where?" The Hollywood fan magazine gossip columnists were also beghnung to catch up with Dean's death. Cal York’s gossipy trflnme was presented in Photoplay: Brief Moment: Contrary to a ridiculous rumor, James Dean had every desire to live. This past year, Jimmy had grown Closer to his estranged father and was beginning to feel he 'belonged.‘ Psychiatry was also helping him to mellow. Says Dick Clayton, his agent—friend who knew him best: 'Jimmy was thrilled about his new million— dollar contract and doing the Rocky Marciano story. Born lonely, he was confused at times and, as a result, his behavior was unorthodox. But every day he lived he struggled to improve. There was only goodness in Jimmy Dean's heart.’5 Hedda Hopper's monthly Motion Picture columne inti— rmmed that she still hasn't recovered from the "tragic and lumimely" death: She felt that Dean, "had he lived . . . Mould have gone far ahead of Brando. To me he had the greater talent." Hopper further mentioned Dean's Hamlet aspirations, the effect of Dean's death on "Liz"-—and con- cfluded her eulogy with an appeal for "a Special Oscar” to be awarded to Dean for his performance in East of Eden. The January Motion Picture also carried a story by director George Stevens entitled "A Tenderness Lost.“7 The title itself carried the mood and the mode of the essay, Einunabashed eulogy, oozing sentimentality. The "tenderness lOSt" referred to Dean's youth: 141 Because I knew he had been motherless since early Childhood and had.missed a lot of the love that makes boyhood jell right, I would come to believe that he was still waiting for some lost tenderness. The piece could be accepted as a touching tribute, delicately phrased: Jimmy, strangely impractical about saying and do- ing the right things, yet in every word and gesture a poetical presence with an individualized approach that I know is opening up a new tradition of acting in Hollywood. One finds out, however, that George Stevens took the time to write the article while ”putting the finishing touches on his latest picture”--Giant. Mr. Stevens was able to Get in some strong plugs for Dean's co—stars, using anecdotes connected with his making of the picture, which he Exoduced as well as directed, as a foundation for his eulogy. The January Films in Review listed Henry Holt's "Ten Best" of 1955.8 Among them was East of Eden, called "a photographic tour de force." Holt also noted: "Teenagers rave been quite taken with East of Eden and the performances in it of James Dean and Julie Harris." Eabel Without a Cause was getting its share of notice fixmlthe "serious" film magazines, too. Eugene Archer con— tributed a rather lengthy review of Rebel Without a Cause to Film Culture.9 The length and depth of the criticism were singularly forceful, giving it a unique position in the Critical reviews contributing to the Dean legend. Archer “Ede particular mention of the fact that the film was re- leased "a few days after the death of James Dean." that 142 'The film was advertised with emphasis on Dean and the sub— ject of violence": The film was originally announced as the first Cinemascope production in black and white, but the producers switched to color when the Cinemascope company objected. In Spite of the elaborate techni— cal process employed, the film gives the impression of being a low-budget product, with a minor director and a little known supporting cast, produced in an effort to capitalize on Dean's sudden success in East of Eden. There is no reason to suSpect it to be good, but it is. Archer felt Dean's acting to be "the major asset" of the fihn, "a simplified variation of the role he played in Banzof Eden," though because "the director, Nicholas Ray, is less gifted with actors than Elia Kazan . . . Dean's play- ing never quite attains the high level of his best scenes in the earlier film." Dean's acting style was traced to the "school of neo~realism first popularized by Anna Magnani in her Rossellini :fiims”: American adapters like Montgomery Clift and Marlon lhando were not originators. Archer felt that "a good deal ofinaccurate criticism" regarding imitation was levelled M:the Dean performance in East of Eden: Many observers, still reacting from the effect made by Brando in On the Waterfront, objected to Dean's use of Similar mannerisms, without reflecting that the mannerisms employed were far more appropriate to Dean's role as a rebellious adolescent than to Brando's thirty- year—Old prizefighter. Archer felt Dean's contributions to be significant and unique: 145 In addition to the unique screen personality which Dean possessed, and an unusual sympathetic quality which is immediately apparent in both his films (a qual- ity which is noticeably lacking in most modern actors). his authoritative playing suggests a potentially un— limited range. By way of comparison Archer brought in two then re- cmn:films dealing with similar aSpects of the same problem equessed in Rebel: The Blackboard Jungle and The Wild One. hlIhe Blackboard Jungle he found "wildly improbable melo— derL" and in The Wild One, in which,significantly, it was MarkniBrando who played a "romanticized characterization of the neurotic contemporary adolescent who exists beyond the pole of conventional society, he again found the melodrama senunmly weakened the thematic treatment. Both films 'hmke elaborate pretense at social comment, but succeed only hlisolating and exaggerating a single aspect of a major problon." On the other hand, Archer asserted: Eabel Without a Cause is less pretentious than its predecessors and more valid than either. Without prob— ing deeply into the causes of delinquency or offering any solution, it nevertheless makes a clear and inter— esting comment about the Situation and raises the issue of moral responsibility in a manner which deserves attention. In EaEaE the key to the protagonist's actions lies in the fact that because he is "unable to find any help from the evading adults surrounding him, he can only act blindly, sometimes brutally, in an effort to substitute action for thought.” Archer felt the hero was "engaged in a struggle in which violence is the only means of expression. If the v o . v . . ‘ '- 144 yumggle is for survival, the violence is necessary to ex- guess that survival and, perhaps, to prove it." As Mr. Archer interprets and expressed the violent mxtrine of the film, one wonders if he is influenced as Immm by the film as he is by his own interpretation of it. the phrasing reflects the impatient attitude of many Ameri— mnm reacting to the "cold war" political and social climate Ofthe United States under the cautious Eisenhower adminis- tratknn The clues are vague, but this is certainly one mgflanation for the present acceptance of the "improbable Imflodrama" certainly present in Rebel. Moreover, on yet anther level, adult audiences would be inclined to accept evmithe melodrama while viewing the film as a form of self— mxmement. Concern over the "juvenile problem" was rampant, amt coached by various popular interpretations, including Iggxfl.Without a Cause, many adults were all too ready to emeept the blame, personally or on behalf of their generation. mlthe political, social, and moral levels, Rebel Without a Qgfifigcould be viewed and accepted by many as an act of centrition, suffered and enjoyed with the impatience and resignation of a mea culpa- Archer continued by praising the "imaginative" work Of director Nicholas Ray in this "wide—screen picture which EQKSE." feeling that Ray "obviously devoted careful study" to Kazan's Cinemascope handling, especially in application Of cutting and odd-angle camera set—ups. Kazan's East of Eden 145 'fimoved that good films could after all be made in Cinema— mxmm" and “seems for that reason the most important film of1955." Though Rebel Without a Cause "on the surface" ammeared to be merely "an entertaining but contrived melo— Ckama with a number of serious flaws . . . within its self- jflposed limitations . . . it is a remarkably interesting woflm and one of the few Hollywood films of recent months vmrthy of serious consideration." And serious consideration it was getting——and mxhences, too. Rebel was doing moderately well at the box cfifice, but publicity of the violence in the picture, gneviously toned down, was now being more openly exploited. Inla.newspaper photo advertisement a "tense scene” illus— trated Dean in "a knife fight."lo Perhaps even more literal and grisly exploitation dfthe Dean phiz appeared with the serious editorial11 in The Saturday Evening Post lamenting the senseless automobile toll in America. The heady c0py was illustrated with a photo Cd Dean labelled "a recent victim." 2 was de— Hedda Hopper's Motion Picture column iteml voted to Elizabeth Taylor's reactions to Dean‘s talents and his death: "Her illness . . . was caused by her grief.” The Taylor—Dean plug seemed worth a second try. The HOpper Column had covered much the same territory the previous month. Yet another actress's reactions to Dean's death were recounted in the February issue of Whisper.13 Editorially, 146 anischaeffer‘s piece "James Dean's Black Madonna" was deanjlmd as "the most extraordinary piece on any movieland cflmracter ever run anywhere." The article told of a short— IUved ”affair" between Dean and Maila Nurmi, who was also knmm1as Vampira, hostess of a horror TV show on the Los Ingeles local ABC outlet. A publicity photo of Vampira, zxmtumed a la Charles Addams, seated next to an open grave, amilabelled, ”Darling, come join me" was featured in the anticle, which told of hexes, premonitions, black magic zfltars, voodoo—-and implied that Vampira had been thrown over lnrDean, who was, himself, for a time interested in black magic. 'When he started dating Ursula Andress, Vampira put acnuse on him, and, since his death, she has been haunted. Dawns interest in the occult had already been noted as one oftfis many fascinations. Its employment here was obviously hithe interests of sensationalism and as a publicity plug for Vampira. Seymour Korman wrote of "The Last Hours of James Dean" in an article for the widely distributed Chicago TTibune.Magazine on February 5, 1956.14 Based on the story Ci Dean's "last hours” as told by Sanford Roth, the article contained numerous ”flashbacks" recounting ”premonitions" of Dean's death by his employers and by himself in conver- sation with Marlon Brando. Though most of the "lovely and talented women" in Dean's life (Ursula Andress, Lori Nelson, Natalie Wood, Pier Angeli) got a plug, care was given to 147 huflude the anecdote of the "lonely, introverted" Jimmy, 'Wmtching, heartbroken," when Pier Angeli left the church after her wedding. ,Korman diSputed Roth's claim that Dean "hadn‘t been