ll! llllllllllllllllililllllflflfllwlllflflflfllfll 3 1293 . 'I-n - ~. TNCENS ' LIBRARY ' Miran State University ‘-..- —?,_ W- This is to certify that the thesis entitled Effect of Diet on Xenobiotic Metabolism by Intestinal Tissues presented by Lorraine Platka-Bird has been accepted towards fulfillment of the requirements for Ph.D. Human Nutrition degree in Major professor June 12, 1980 Date 0-7639 OVERDUE FINES: 25¢ per div per item RETURNING UBRARY MATERIALS ; _____._____.______..__ Place in book return to remove charge from circulation records EFFECT OF DIET ON XENOBIOTIC METABOLISM BY INTBSTINAL TISSUES By Lorraine Platka-Bird A DISSERTATION submitted to Michigan State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Department of Food Science and Human Nutrition 1980 ABSTRACT EFFECT OF DIET ON XENOBIOTIC METABOLISM BY INTESTINAL TISSUES BY Lorraine Platka-Bird A.model system was developed to study xenobiotic metabolism by the intestinal tissue-microflora ecosystem. Interaction between drug metab- olizing pathways in colon cells and intestinal microflora may be important in production of compounds which act as carcinogens or cocarcinogens in colonic tissues. Benzo(a)pyrene (BP) was used as the model carcinogen because (a) its metabolism is representative of metabolism in a group of common environmental contaminants, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, (b) it can be both mutagenic and carcinogenic, and (c) there is a vast literature on the metabolism of BP. Charcoal-broiled hamburger (CBH) was chosen as the source of dietary xenobiotics based on the presence, in CBH, of measurable levels of compounds which induce drug metabolizing enzymes. BP metabolism was measured in the colon, small intestine, and liver of rats fed purified diets or diets containing CBH. Microsomal aryl hydrocarbon hydroxylase (AHH) activity, as measured by fluorometric and radioactive assays, was significantly greater in all three tissues from rats fed the CBH diet than in tissues from rats fed the purified diet. Feeding CBH resulted in greater enzyme induction than did feeding 0.1 or 0.5 mg BP/gram of diet. AHH induction by CBH-feeding was related to both Lorraine Platka-Bird the level of fat in the hamburger before charcoal-broiling, and the total level of CBH in the diet. Enzyme activities were maximal after feeding CBH for 4 days in the small intestine and liver, and by 10 days in the colon. Addition of various fiber sources to the purified or the CBH diets had minimal effects on enzyme activity. The relevance of dietary-induced alterations in AHH activity was assessed by measuring in_vit£g_mutagenicity of BP metabolites produced, and the ability of the metabolites to bind to cellular macromolecules in 1212' These determinations were based on concepts relating mutagenesis and macromolecular binding to basic mechanisms of carcinogenesis. Feeding CBH did not result in increased activation of BP to mutagenic derivatives in the Ames test for any of the tissues tested. Binding of BP to cellular macromolecules was increased in all three tissues from rats fed the CBH diet, but BP was not bound to DNA. The results show that alterations in intestinal metabolism of xenobiotics produced by diet may influence mechanisms which are basic to carcinogenesis. These alterations may represent an additional role for diet in the etiology of colon cancer. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to express sincere gratitude to Dr. M. R. Bennink fer his guidance, his patience and the values he has instilled in me over the past several years. I would also like to thank Dr. D. R. Romsos for his helpful suggestions and my Ph.D. committee members Drs. S. Aust, C. welsch, M. Yokoyama, and 1. Gray. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Page LIST OF TABLES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . iv LIST OF FIGURES. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . v INTRODUCTION. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 REVIEW OF LITERATURE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 Mechanisms of Carcinogenesis. . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 Nutrition and Cancer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 Nutrition and Colon Cancer . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 MATERIALS AND METHODS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23 Animals. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23 Diets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23 Enzyme Induction. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23 Preparation of Tissue Microsomes . . . . . . . . . 25 Enzyme Assays. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 Ames Test . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26 Isolation of Colonic Epithelial Cells. . . . . Cell Cultures. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 Binding of BP to Cellular Macromolecules. . . . . . . . . 28 Isolation of DNA. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29 Enzyme Activity . . . . . . . . . . Cell Cultures. . . . . . . . . . . Ames Test . . . . . . . . . . . . Binding of BP to Cellular Macromolecules. O O O O 57 CONCLUSIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 69 REFERENCES 0 O O O O O O O I O O O O O O O O O O 70 iii Table LIST OF TABLES Composition of Experimental Diets . . . . . . . . Hyperplasia of the Liver, Small Intestine and Colon of Rats Fed Charcoal-broiled Hamburger. . . . . . . Benzo(a)pyrene Metabolism by Isolated Colonic Epithelial cells. 0 O O O O O I O O O O O O O O 0 Activation of Benzo(a)pyrene by Colon, Small Intestine 811d Liver 8-9 FraCtionS. o o o o o o o o o 0 iv Page 24 37 S7 59 LIST OF FIGURES Figure Page 1. Benzo(a)pyrene . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 2. Metabolism of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons . . . . . 8 3. Aryl Hydrocarbon Hydroxylase Activity in Colon Microsomes as Related to Incubation Time . . . . . . . . . . 31 4. Relationship of Aryl Hydrocarbon Hydroxylase Activity in Colon Microsomes to Protein Concentration . . . . . . 33 5. Effect of Feeding Charcoal-broiled Hamburger on Aryl Hydrocarbon Hydroxylase Activity . . . . . . . . . 35 6. Time Required fer Aryl Hydrocarbon Hydroxylase Induction and Return to Control Levels. . . . . . . . . . . 40 7. Aryl Hydrocarbon Hydroxylase Activity as Related to Ham- burger Content of the Diet . . . . . . . . . . . 42 8. Effect of Dietary Benzo(a)pyrene on Aryl Hydrocarbon Hydroxylase Activity . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45 9. Effect of Fat Level in Hamburger on Aryl Hydrocarbon Hydroxylase Activity . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49 10. Effect of Feeding Heated Fats on Aryl Hydrocarbon Hydroxylase Activity . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51 11. Effect of Feeding Various Fiber Sources on Aryl Hydrocarbon Hydroxylase Activity . . . . . . . . . . . . . S4 12. Binding of Benzo(a)pyrene to Cellular Macromolecules in Tissues of Rats Fed Charcoal-broiled Hamburger. . . . . 62 13. Effect of Feeding Charcoal-broiled Hamburger and Pretreat- ment with B-naphthoflavone on Binding of Benzo(a)pyrene to Cellular Macromolecules I. . . . . . . . . . . 64 14. Effect of Feeding Charcoal-broiled Hamburger and Pretreat- ment with B-naphthoflavone on Binding of Benzo(a)pyrene to Cellular Macromolecules 11 . . . . . . . . . . 66 INTRODUCTION Cancer of the colon is the second.most common malignancy and the second most common cause of death from cancer in the United States (1). Colon cancer rates in different geographical locations implicate environ- mental factors as being important in development of large bowel cancer. Among the environmental factors, diet has been pr0posed to be of signi- ficant importance in the etiology of this disease. The dietary components which have been associated with colon cancer are fat, animal protein, fiber, and certain vegetables. There are several mechanisms by which these dietary constitutents may exert their effects. Fat and animal protein affect neutral sterol and bile acid metabolism by the liver and intestinal microflora. Steroid derivatives may be important as promoters of carcinogenesis. Fiber may influence carcino- genesis by decreasing exposure of the intestinal epithelium to carcinogens or promoters, and cruciferous vegetables can alter activity of enzymes involved in metabolism of xenobiotics. Many studies in experimental colon carcinogenesis have utilized long- term feeding studies to determine how various factors in the diet influ- ence chemically-induced colon carcinogenesis. A second area has focused on the effects of diet on the taxonomic grouping and enzyme activity of intestinal microorganisms involved in metabolism of carcinogens and other compounds entering the colon. Little emphasis has been placed on the role of intestinal tissue itself in metabolism of xenobiotics. Elucidation of the role of diet in intestinal tissue xenobiotic metabolism could pro- vide insight to additional mechanisms by which nutrition can influence colon carcinogenesis. The objectives of this study were: (1) to develop a model system to study dietary-induced alterations in xenobiotic metabolism; (2) to investi- gate whether enzymes which metabolize xenobiotics can be induced in intestinal tissues; and (3) to determine how dietary variables influence intestinal tissue xenobiotic metabolism. REVIEW OF LITERATURE It has become increasingly apparent over the past several years that environmental factors play an important role in the development of a significant proportion of human cancers. Current estimates of cancer incidence related to the environment range from 60 to 90 percent. These estimates are based on differences in mortality rates from specific cancers in different geographical locations (2). Based on observations linking cancer to the environment, a major focus in cancer research has been directed toward (a) identifying chemical agents in the environment which can initiate carcinogenesis, and (b) deter- mining other variables in the environment which can modify the carcinogenic process. To further clarify the significance of environmental factors in the etiology of cancer, it has become especially important to elucidate the mechanisms by which these factors exert their effects. Mechanisms of Carcinogenesis The mechanisms of chemically-induced cancer have been studied exten- sively in experimental animals. One of the more accepted theories of carcinogenesis, based primarily on experiments with.mouse skin, is that carcinogenesis is a multistage process requiring at least two critical steps, initiation and promotion (3,4,5). In initiation, the administra- tion of a chemical compound to the skin of experimental animals results in rapid alterations in some of the cells exposed to the initiating agent. These changes, which are thought to be irreversible, are not alone suffi- cient to result in tumor growth. However, if the altered cells are repeatedly exposed to promoting agents, uninhibited cell replication occurs resulting in neoplastic growth. For tunors to develop it is essential that application of the promoter follows application of the initiator, and that there is repeated application of the promoter (1). Some chemical carcinogens, such as 7,12-dimethy1benz(a)anthracene can produce cancer at high doses without promoting agents. The mechanisms involved in this type of carcinogenesis have not been elucidated. A large number and great variety of both organic and inorganic com- pounds are capable of initiating the carcinogenic process. These chemical agents can be broadly classified as (a) direct-acting carcinogens, which do not require modification to exert their deleterious effects (such as alkylating or acetylating agents), and (b) procarcinogens, which require metabolic activation to produce more reactive metabolites. The majority of environmentally important carcinogens fall into the second classifi- cation (6). Activation of procarcinogens to their proximate or ultimate carcino- genic form often involves the same metabolic pathways which are used for conversion of xenobiotics to forms which can be excreted from the body. In this detoxification process, lipid-soluble xenobiotics are metabolized to more polar water-soluble compounds which can be conjugated for excre- tion. The metabolites produced in this process can be electrophilic reactants which can be acted upon by conjugating enzymes, or they can attach to electron-rich or nucleophilic sites upon cellular macromolecules. Because nucleophilic sites are relatively abundant in proteins and nucleic acids, production of electron-deficient species can result in protein- or nucleic acid-adducts which make the cell susceptible to initiation of neoplasia. Administration of a procarcinogen to experimental animals produces protein-, RNA-, and DNA-bound derivatives which can be isolated from target tissues (7). The role of promoters has been less clearly defined. The most com- monly used promoter in animal studies has been croton oil from the seeds of Croton tiglium (S). The active ingredients in croton oil are the 12,13-diesters of diterprene alcohol phorbols, the most active of which is tetradecanoly-phorbol acetate (8). These compounds produce several phenotypic changes in promoted cells including (a) increased synthesis of RNA, DNA, protein, and phospholipids, (b) increased mitotic rates, (c) increased protease activity, and (d) a 200- to 400-fold induction of ornithine decarboxylase activity (9). One current theory proposes that promoters act through increased ornithine decarboxylase levels. According to this theory, repeated administration of promoters to initiated cells results in an inability of the cells to return ornithine decarboxylase activity to control levels, producing elevated levels of polyamines in transformed cells (9). Two major theories concerning mechanisms of carcinogenesis have emerged from numerous studies on chemically-induced cancer in experimental animals. The more widely accepted theory is the genetic mechanism where tumorigenesis results from alterations in the genes themselves. The genomic abberations can be produced by reaction of electrophilic species directly with DNA, through modification of RNA which is to be transcribed and integrated into DNA, or through alteration of cellular proteins which are involved in DNA repair (1). The role of nucleic acids in storage and translation of genetic information makes these cellular organelles the more likely targets to produce alterations in the genome of the cell. Interaction of carcinogens with cellular macromolecules can occur through covalent binding or through noncovalent binding. Covalent binding occurs with electrophilic reactants capable of sharing electrons with target sites in the cellular macromolecules. Noncovalent binding is more likely to occur with compounds which have a planar aromatic ring approxi- mately the size of a base pair, allowing for intercalation or stacking of the carcinogen between base pairs in the DNA (6). Several studies have shown a strong correlation between binding of carcinogens to DNA and carcinogenicity (10,11,12). The less prominent theory of carcinogenesis is the epigenetic mechanism in which the fundamental premise is that the abnormality exists in gene expression and no alteration in genomic infor- mation of the cell is required for production of tumors (13,14). One of the more prevalent groups of environmental contaminants which fall into the classification of chemical carcinogens is the polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH). These compounds are produced from incomplete combustion of organic fuels and are released into the environment at sig- nificant levels in highly industrialized areas. They are carcinogenic in several tissues in many species including man (15). The most widely studied PAH include benzo(a)pyrene (BP), 3-methycholanthrene dibenz(§h)- anthracene, and 7,12-dimethylbenz(a)anthracene. PAH require metabolic activation by a group of nonspecific mixed function oxidases (MFO's) of the cytochrome P450 (cyt P450) family to be converted to the ultimate carcinogenic form (1,16). The enzyme system involved in PAH metabolism is located on the end0plasmic reticulum or the microsomal fraction of the cell. The MFO system has also been associated with the nuclear membrane, but the qualitative and quantitative importance of activity in the nucleus has not been elucidated (17). In both parts of the cell the enzyme system consists of two protein components, cyt P450 and NADPH cyt P reductase, and a lipid component, phosphatidyl choline. 450 Enzyme activity requires NADPH as a cofactor and molecular oxygen as a substrate. The rate-limiting step of the reaction is the reduction of cyt P The enzyme system is inducible and shows large variation in 450° inducibility between different tissues and between different species. Inducibility of the enzyme system is regulated genetically (18). Much of the information about the cyt P MFO's has been gained 450 from studies on BP (see Fig. 1). BP is considered to be one of the most carcinogenic PAH's, and the level of this xenobiotic.irlenvironmental pollutants is considered to reflect overall PAH contamination. Metabolism of BP has been studied extensively. Figure l. Benzo(a)pyrene The cyt P450 MFO involved in BP metabolism has been termed aryl hydrocarbon hydroxylase (AHH). The form of cyt P450 which metabolizes native BP is the same form which is induced by 3-methy1cholathrene and B—naphthoflavone, and is known as cytochrome P448 (cyt P448;15). AHH activity on BP results in the production of arene oxides which can have several metabolic fates including: (a) nonenzymatic conversion to phenols; (b) enzymatic conversion to dihydrodiols by the action of epoxide hydratase; (c) enzymatic or nonenzymatic conjugation with glutathione, glucuronic acid, or sulfate; and (d) NADPH-dependent reduction to the parent compound (15). The dihydrodiols produced by the action of epoxide hydratase can again be acted upon by AHH resulting in the pro- duction of highly-reactive dial-epoxides. These derivatives can also be conjugated to glutathione, glucuronic acid, or sulfate by the conjugating enzymes to ferm soluble, detoxified metabolites (see Fig. 2). further I ”abolis- further (3“ I‘Ictoboltsl ; IOH 00H R \\ I epoxide $6 aryl hydrocarbon _ 0 '31:“ 3:23;. oonoonygonaso 4"? ‘t. \\ ‘9 R l... ' “§ on:;Ictic \ \ ()fi covalently heund to ”‘0 "‘1 .m protein R turthor metabolis- epoxide roductoso ’- Figure 2. Metabolism of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (after DePierre and Ernster, 1978). BP metabolites produced by these pathways have been examined fer mutagenicity and carcinogenicity. Based on calculations by the Pullmans (19), K-reion epoxides (4,5 position of BP) were first implicated to be the most carcinogenic. This area was calculated to have the most double bond-like character. The 4,5-epoxide derivative is highly mutagenic for bacteria and for mammalian cells in culture, but it does not show high carcinogenic activity when painted on mouse skin (20,21). It has since been recognized that the most critical site fer BP metabolism leading to potentially carcinogenic derivatives is at the 7,8 position (22,23). A.major ultimate electrophilic, mutagenic, and carcinogenic metabolite of BP is the 7,8-diol-9,10-epoxide. This epoxide is very unstable and is usually isolated from biological systems as the tetrol formed by the addition of water (24). The major product produced by reaction of this metabolite with DNA is a BP-DNA adduct between the 2-amino group of guanine and the C-10 position of BP (25). Secondary hydrocarbon-nucleic acid adducts are fermed by the reaction of the epoxide with cytosine and adenine residues of DNA (26). The relevance of the various metabolic pathways to carcinogenesis lies in the balance between activation and detoxification of procarcinogens. The water-soluble derivatives produced through conjugation probably represent the major in 3132 detoxification mechanism, whereas DNA-bound derivatives represent the carcinogenic mechanism. As the ultimate car- cinogen is probably a transient intermediate, the relative activity of these competing mechanisms determines the amount of reactive intermediates which a given tissue is exposed to. Steady state levels of the ultimate carcinogen will vary in different tissues and in different species according to genetically determined dif- ferences in enzyme activity, and according to diet, xenobiotic exposure, and the physiological state of the organism (15). The nongenetic variables may act through their effects on enzyme induction by altering the relative 10 rates of synthesis and degradation of the carcinogenic species. The most susceptible cells to carcinogenesis may be those with either an increased rate of activation to the ultimate carcinogen or those with a decreased ability to detoxify xenobiotics to water-scluble derivatives. This wouId result in prolonged survival of the species, increasing the chances for reaction with cellular macromolecules. A final concept of fundamental importance to carcinogenesis is DNA repair. Reaction of cellular macromolecules, including DNA, with chemical compounds capable of producing deleterious alterations occurs continually. Mammalian cells have several systems capable of repairing altered DNA (27). The rate of DNA repair varies in different tissues and may also vary within tissues depending on the carcinogen involved and the site of adduct fermation. Whether neoplastic growth occurs depends on the relationship between the rate of DNA repair and the time of expression of the altered genome. Nutrition and Cancer One environmental factor which has been strongly implicated in modifying carcinogenesis is nutrition. It has been estimated that diet is related to 60 percent of cancers in females and to greater than 40 percent of cancers in males (28). Epidemiological studies provide some insights concerning environment and cancer. Japanese immigrants to the United States develop a shift in cancer incidence patterns toward those prevalent in the United States within two to three generations. This shift is represented by an increase in the incidence of breast and colon cancer and a decrease in the incidence of stomach cancer (29,30). The dietary modifications which correlate with 11 this shift include an increase in meat and fat consumption, a decrease in fiber and vegetable intake, an increase in the intake of refined carbohyd- rates, and an increase in overall caloric consumption. Nutrient imbalances can influence several areas related to the development of’neoplasia including tumor nutrition, cell-mediated immu- nological destruction of neoplastic cells, hormonal control of tumor growth, and carcinogen availability (31). Carcinogen availability can be affected by both the actual level of carcinogens or potential carcinogens in the foods consumed and through modification of the enzyme systems involved in the conversion of xenobiotics to carcinogenic forms. Dietary-induced alterations in drug metabolism have been studied in many tissues in several species. The MFO's are greatly influenced by diet and it appears that most nutrients are capable of altering MFO activity when consumed at either deficient or excessive levels. Animal studies concerning protein intake and tumor incidences have yielded inconsistent results; chemically-induced tumor incidences have been decreased by both low protein and high protein diets (32,33). Con- flicting results on the effects of protein on tumorigenesis may be due to protein effects on different mechanisms of tumor development. Dietary protein could influence tumor initiation through its effects on MFO activity, tumor promotion through its effects on cell replication, tumor growth rate through its effects on cell-mediated immunity, or tumor nutrition through the supply of amino acids required by the tumor (34). Protein deficiency, due to either low levels of dietary protein or poor protein quality, inhibits MFO activity (35). Clinton et a1. (32) showed dramatically decreased AHH activities when the protein level of the diet was decreased from 45 percent to 7.5 percent. Protein deficiency can 12 also result in increased glucuronyltransferase activity in livers of experimental animals (36,37). The combined effects of decreased MFO activity and increased transferase activity may produce more conjugated derivatives of carcinogens and less reactive electrophiles, and thereby decrease the risk fer carcinogenesis. In several studies chemically-induced tumor production in experimental animals has been increased by high fat diets (38-43). Although dietary fat may influence MFO activity, it has been proposed that the major role for fat is related to its effects on promotion (40,44,45). Cruciferous vegetables such as Brussels sprouts, cabbage, and cauli- flower contain indoles which induce AHH activity and decrease risk from PAH-induced cancers in experimental animals (46-48). The most active indole compound in inducing AHH is indole-3-carbinol. The derivatives 3,3'-diindoy1methane and indole-3-acetonitrile produce lower levels of induction (49). In DMBA-induced mammary tumorigenesis and BP-induced forestomach neoplasia Wattenberg and Loub (47) feund a decrease in the number of animals developing tumors and in the number of tumors per animal when isolated indoles were added to the diet or injected as a single dose prior to carcinogen administration. Graham and Mettlin (50) feund a decreased risk for colon cancer associated with vegetable consumption. However, other investigators (51,52) found no relationship between cancer incidence and total vegetable consumption. Other dietary variables which have been shown to inhibit chemically- induced carcinogenesis include selenium, vitamin E, butylated hydroxy anisole, butylated hydroxytoluene, and vitamin A. The antioxidant pro- peties of some of these compounds are believed to inhibit carcinogenesis by interfering with metabolic transfermation of procarcinogens to ultimate 13 carcinogens. Some of these agents may also act by combining with free radicals to prevent tumorigenic cellular reactions (53). The mechanism fer vitamin A probably involves its role in cell turnover and in main- tenance of integrity of epithelial cells. Several agents capable of causing cancer have been identified in the food chain. Mycotoxins, such as aflatoxin Bl, are extremely toxic com- pounds which are produced by molds in certain foods such as nuts, oilseeds, and grains (54). These agents can enter the food supply directly from mold growth on food or indirectly through the use of contaminated ingre- dients in processed feeds or by feeding contaminated feed to animals which produce consumable products. Aflatoxin B1 is the most potent liver carcinogen known and its effects can be seen at very low levels of con- sumption. Sodium nitrite and sodium nitrate are common fbod additives. The hazard of these agents to human health derives from conversion of nitrates to nitrites and combination of nitrites with secondary or tertiary amines at the acid pH of the stomach. This results in the formation of carcino- genic N-nitrosamines (55). Compounds which have been shown to be mutagenic in inugitrg'mutagene- sis assays have been isolated from cooked meat and fish (56-59). The pro— duction of’mutagens is related to the length of time and the temperature at which the meat is cooked. In the experiments of Matsumoto et al. (56), heating of peptides and proteins resulted in production of mutagenic metabolites at temperatures above 400°. Mutagenic potential was maximum at 500° for dipeptides containing tryptophan and at 600° fer proteins in general. Nagao et al. (60) and Commoner et a1. (61) showed that cooking proteinaceous foods at relatively high temperatures produced mutagenic 14 activity distinguishable from BP or the pyrolysis products of amino acids (62). These mutagenic agents have yet to be shown to be carcinogenic in man (57) . PAH contamination of consumable products can occur through pollution of the atmosphere, soil, or water, during fbod processing, or with use of petroleum based food additives. Measurable levels of PAH have been detected in many commonly consuned foods such as charcoal-broiled meats and fishes, smoked foods, and vegetables and fruits grown in polluted environments (63-65). The level of PAH in meat and fish depends largely on the method of processing or cooking. Smoking and charcoal-broiling appear to produce higher levels of PAH than other processing and cooking methods (64,66). It has been proposed that the occurrence of these compounds in charcoal- broiled foods results from fats dripping down onto the hot coals and pro- ducing pyrolysis products which rise in the smoke to condense on the sur- face of the grilled meat (67). The level of PAH produced depends on the time and temperature of cooking, the closeness of the food to the coals, and the level of fat in the meat or fish (66). Studies by Pariza et a1. (62) indicate that the cooking temperature is more important than the length of time of cooking in producing PAH. Rappaport et a1. (68) found that cooking ground meat at high temperatures in closed systems (systems in which volatilized agents are recirculated over the food) resulted in significantly greater PAH levels than when the meats were cooked in open systems. These authors concluded that over 90 percent of the mutagens formed in open cooking procedures are volatilized. Furthermore, cooking procedures which allow for redisposition of airborn substances increase the level of mutagens in cooked foods. 15 The level of BP in fbods is considered to be an adequate reflection of overall PAH contamination (69). Levels as high as 121 ppb BP have been detected in cooked beef containing approximately 40 percent fat. It is likely that consumption of food products containing high levels of BP results in exposure to a large number of PAH and possibly other xenobiotics. These compounds may differ in ferm and level of induction of drug metabolizing enzymes. A synergistic effect on enzyme induction may result from ingestion of mixed food products. Nutrition and Colon Cancer One of the most prevalent forms of cancer which is related to diet is colon cancer. Cancer of the large bowel is second only to skin cancer as the most common malignancy and is second only to lung cancer as the most common cause of death from cancer in the United States (1). Diet could potentially modify colon carcinogenesis in several ways including: (a) provision of carcinogens directly in the diet; (b) modifi- cation of the taxonomic grouping or enzyme activity of intestinal bacteria resulting in altered metabolism of potential carcinogens; (c) modification of the enzyme activity or histological characteristics of the intestinal mucosa resulting in increased susceptibility to carcinogenesis; (d) modi- fication of enzyme activity in other tissues producing an altered profile of metabolites reaching the colon; and (e) modification of promoting agents which reach the colon. Epidemiological studies show important trends in the relationship between food consumption and colon cancer. The incidence of this disease is greater in North America and Western Europe (where diets high in animal protein and fat and low in fiber are consuned) than it is in Japan, Asia, 16 Africa, South America and rural India (where diets are low in animal products and higher in fiber) (51,70-72). The incidence of colon cancer in Japanese consuming Western diets is higher than in Japanese consuming Oriental diets (73), and in Japan colon cancer incidence rates are in- creasing in line with gradual westernization of the Japanese diet (74). Japanese immigrants to Hawaii have a significantly greater chance of developing colon cancer than do Japanese in Japan (51). That diet is more important than environmental pollution is shown by the fact that the pollution level in Japan is higher than in Hawaii, but the incidence of colon cancer is lower in Japan (53). Also, colon cancer incidence does not correlate with smoking. This indicates that the environ- mental pollutants which are most important in the development of lung cancer do not play a major role in the etiology of colon cancer. K Interpretation of results from epidemiological studies must be care- fully considered due to problems associated with isolating specific feed components in the diet and variation in the presence of additives, preser- vatives, fertilizers, pesticides, and other contaminants in the diet. How- ever, the evidence to date strongly suggests important interaction between nutritional habits and large bowel cancer. The majority of animal studies support epidemiological studies impli- cating diet as a major etiologic factor in colon cancer. Animal models have been described which produce a reasonably accurate representation of human colon cancer (75-78). These models allow investigators to manipulate specific dietary variables to study their effects on the mechanisms involved in colon carcinogenesis. Four classes of chemical agents capable of producing large bowel cancer have been identified. These include some PAH, 3-amino-4-biphenyl derivaties, l7 alkylnitrosoureido derivatives, and 1,2-dimethy1hydrazine (DMH) deriva- tives (79). DMH or metabolic derivatives have been the most widely used due to their specificity for the colon. It is not clear whether the majority of DMH derivatives reach the colon via the bile or whether they are transported in the blood and taken up by the colon (79,80). The mechanism of action of DMH in producing colon carcinomas has not been elucidated. DMH binds to several other tissues such as the liver, small intestine, and kidneys, but carcinogenesis in these tissues is signi- ficantly lower than in the colon (81). It has been postulated that the higher incidence of DMH-induced tumors in the colon may be due to a delayed or incomplete repair system. Kanagalingam and Balis (82) found slower repair of DNA in the colon than in the small intestine when rats were given a single dose of DMH. Based on the results from epidemoiological studies and from experi- mental studies in animals and humans the major dietary factors which have been implicated in colon cancer are fat, cholesterol, animal protein, fiber and certain vegetables. The fead component which has been most strongly implicated is dietary fat. Populations consuming high-fat western diets are at greater risk for colon cancer (83). Animal studies demonstrate that colon carcinogens are more effective in animals on high fat diets (79,84). High levels of dietary fat can increase both the percentage of animals developing tumors and the number of tumors produced per animal (42,43,85,86). The importance of fat content in the diet appears to be related to its effect on secretion of bile acids and neutral sterols. Reddy and Nynder (87) demonstrated good correlation between fat consumption, the level of bile acids and neutral sterols excreted, and risk for colon 18 cancer. Evidence indicates that bile acids and their metabolites may be important as tunor promoters (88-97) . Because it is necessary for tumor promoters to be consistently present in appreciable amounts to be effec- tive, steroid derivatives are likely candidates for this role based on their constant presence in the large bowel. High levels of dietary fat increase bile flow and increase production of bile acids required fer fat absorption from the intestine. The end result is more bile acids and neutral sterols reaching the large bowel. The effects of dietary fat on steroid metabolites reaching the colon may be related to both composition and metabolic activity of the intestinal microflora (87,92,93). Studies to investigate the effects of diet on gut flora have yielded extremely inconsistent results. Some reports suggest that high risk p0pu- 1ations excrete more anaerobes, while low risk populations excrete more aerobic bacteria (92,93). However, other studies demonstrate no differ- ence in the number or species of bacteria in feces from high and low risk populations. Experiments designed to alter the intestinal flora through dietary modification within individual subjects have been largely un- successful (94-98). More recent evidence indicates that alterations in the enzyme activity of large bowel microorganisms are more important than taxonomic groupings (95,99,100). Cholesterol dehydrogenase (conversion of cholesterol to coprostanone), 7 o-dehydroxylase (conversion of primary to secondary bile acids), and B-glucuronidase (hydrolysis of conjugated compounds) are inducible enzymes and may be controlled by substrates reaching the colon and other dietary factors. Populations consuming high fat diets excrete more secondary bile acids and cholesterol metabolites than p0pulations 19 consuming low fat diets (93). This indicates increased activity of 7o-dehydroxy1ase and cholesterol dehydrogenase. Numerous studies report an increased ability of intestinal microbes to hydrolyze glucuronides in populations at high risk for colon cancer (92,101,102). Colon cancer patients compared with control patients excrete more secondary steroids and have increased cholesterol dehydrogenase and 7a- dehydroxylase activity in their feces (99,103). However, it is not clear whether these changes are etiologic or occur as a result of the carcino- genic process. Studies on protein consumption and large bowel cancer indicate that there is a relationship between animal protein consumption and bile acid metabolism. Subjects consuming high meat diets excrete higher levels of acid and neutral steroids and have higher rates of microbial conversion of these steroids to their secondary products (104). B-glucuronidase activity is higher in rats fed diets enriched with ground beef than in rats fed non-supplemented diets (84,93,101,102). However, Graham et al. (105) report little effect of meat consumption on neutral and acid steroid excretion or risk for large bowel cancer. Interpretation of these studies has been complicated by the diffi- culty in separating meat consumption from fat consumption, as most meat products are relatively high in fat. The limited number of studies which have isolated these variables indicate that the importance of high meat intake may be more related to the level of fat intake than animal protein consumption per se (87,92). In addition to diet, other factors such as stress and age appear to be important in determining the type and quantity of steroid metabolites reaching the colon. Meore et al. (106) feund that fear or stress produced 20 significantly greater alterations in intestinal microflora than could be produced by dietary modification. These authors suggested that bacterial response probably involves epinephrine which affects both bile flow and intestinal motility. Other studies have shown that the microbial enzymes cholesterol dehydrogenase, 7a-dehydroxylase, and B-glucuronidase are significantly affected by age (107). The inconsistent results relating diet to bacterial species and to enzyme activity of intestinal microflora makes it difficult to interpret the relevance of these findings. Failure to standardize methods of col- lection, storage, and analysis between investigators are responsible for many of the inconsistencies noted above. Until these technological problems can be resolved, such studies will provide minimal useful information related to this aspect of colon carcinogenesis. Early hypotheses relating dietary fiber intake to colon cancer were developed by Burkitt (108). There are several possible effects of fiber as a protective factor against colon carcinogenesis. These include: (a) decreased intestinal transit time resulting in shorter contact of potential carcinogens with the intestinal mucosa; (b) increased fecal bulk resulting in decreased concentrations of potential carcinogens exposed to the intestinal mucosa; (c) altered composition and metabolic activity of the intestinal flora; (d) binding of bile acids resulting in increased excretion; and (e) binding of carcinogens for excretion and consequent decreased absorption by intestinal cells (108). Epidemiological evidence suggests that the incidence of colon cancer is lower in populations consuming high fiber diets (50,109-111). In a Finnish population examined by Reddy et a1. (89) diet was characterized by both high-fiber and high-fat consumption. In this population the 21 incidence of colon cancer was low. In the subjects daily neutral steroid output was higher and daily bile acid output was similar to levels found in American subjects. However, greater fecal bulk due to increased fiber intake resulted in decreased steroid concentrations and consequent dimunition of exposure of these compounds to the intestinal mucosa. Because there were other dietary variables such as meat and dairy product consumption which differed between the two population groups, the Specific effects of fiber could not be isolated in this study. However, the results do provide support for fiber as one of the dietary modifiers in colon carcinogenesis. Experimental studies on fiber intake and colon cancer have yielded inconsistent results. The protective effect of dietary fiber toward colon cancer appears to depend on the type of fiber and the particular carcinogen examined (112-114). In DMH-induced colon carcinogenesis, addition of wheat bran to the diet was effective in decreasing the total number of tumors, but not the number of malignant tumors in experimental rats (114). However, other studies report no effect of other fiber sources on tumor incidence in the colon. Investigation of the effects of fiber on colon cancer has been hindered by difficulties in separating fiber effects from other dietary variables and problems associated with the use of retrospective diet histories in epidemiological investigations. Also, dietary fiber has not been adequately defined, creating problems for both epidemoiological and experimental studies. Clarification of these issues will be beneficial in elucidating the effects of dietary fiber on colon carcinogenesis. In addition to the effects of fat, fiber and other dietary consti- tuents on substrates which pass through the large bowel and the metabolism 22 of these substrates by endogenous microflora, food intake may affect the ability of the colonic mucosa to metabolize compounds which it is exposed to. Several studies demonstrate that intestinal mucosa has a MFO system which can metabolize drugs and carcinogens (46, 115-118). Autrup et al (115) have cultured human colon explants which can convert native BP to a metabolite (7,8-dihydroxy BP) which can bind to colonic DNA. There was considerable interindividual variation in BP binding to DNA. In these studies the total level of metabolites produced by human colon explants was similar to the level produced by rat colon explants, but there was a higher ratio of organic-soluble derivatives and binding was higher in human colon explants. These results indicate that rats detoxify more of the primary metabolites of BP. Human colon explants fermed only guanine adducts (N-Z amino group) while rat colon explants formed adducts with both guanine and adenine. The data to date clearly indicate that nutrition is a determining factor in the etiology of colon cancer. Based on the evidence which has accumulated, the current focus in colon cancer research must be directed toward identifying causative, protective, and modifying factors in the diet and determining the mechanisms by which they exert their effects. In this study I will describe a model system used to study dietary- induced alterations in metabolism of xenobiotics by intestinal tissues. Within this model system charcoal-broiled hamburger was used as a dietary source of xenobiotics, and BP was used as a model substance to evaluate xenobiotic metabolism. The relevance of dietary-induced alterations in BP metabolism to colon carcinogenesis was evaluated by measuring the mutagenicity of BP metabolities and by measuring binding of these metabo- lites to cellular macromolecules. MATERIALS AND METHODS Animals Male Sprague-Dawley rats weighing 100-125 grams were obtained from Spartan Research Corporation, Haslett, Mi. 48864. The rats were housed individually in wire-bottom cages and maintained at 20: 2° with a 12/12 hour light/dark cycle. Food and water were provided ad libitum. mats Compositions of the basic experimental diets are shown in Table 1. These diets were used for all studies except with the modifications as noted in Results and Discussion. Unless otherwide indicated experimental diets were fed for two weeks. Analytical compositions of the experimental diets are described in Results and Discussion. Diets were dried at 80° to a constant weight. Lipids were extracted from the dried diets with diethyl ether. Protein was determined by Kjeldahl nitrogen (119) and is expressed as crude dietary protein. Enzyme Induction Animals induced with B-napthoflavone (Aldrich Chemical Co., Inc., Milwaukee, Wi.) received one intraperitoneal injection of B-naphthoflavone (80 mg/kg body weight) in corn oil for 3 successive days befOre sacrifice. Animals induced with Aroclor (Monsanto Co., St. Louis, Mo.) received one intraperitoneal injection of Aroclor 1254 (500 mg/kg body weight) in corn oil for 3 successive days before sacrifice. 23 24 Table l.--Composition of Experimental Diets. % Composition by Weight Control CBH Cornstarch 68 -- Casein 20 -- Charcoal-broiled Hamburgera -- 88 Sucrose, Minerals, Corn Oil, Vitaminsb 12 12 aTen pound logs of ground hamburger containing 25 percent fat before charcoal-broiling were thawed and sliced into 1 cm thick patties. The meat patties were grilled approximately 5 cm from the coals for approximately 10 min per side until very well done. bSucrose, 5 percent; minerals, 4 percent (salt mix, 4164, Teklad, Inc., Madison, Wi.; in g/100 g: calcium acetate. H20, 6.293; calcium diphosphate ° 2 H 0, 28.525; dipotassium phosphate, 28.443; ferric citrate - 5 H20, 2.44; magnesium sulfate - 7 H20, 10.053; potassium iodine, 0.65; sodium diphosphate - 12 H20, 14.630; sodium chloride, 9.546); corn oil, 2 percent (Archer Daniels Midland Co., Decatur, 11.); vitamins, 1 percent (thiamine, HCl, llg; pyridoxine, 11g; riboflavin, 11g; calcium pantothenate -'33g; p-aminobenzoic acid; 55 g; menadione, 25g; inositol, 50g; ascorbic acid 100g; niacin, 50g; vitamin B12, 15mg; biotin, 0.3g; folic acid, 2g; retinol acetate, 1x107 IU; a-tocopheIOI, 50,000 IU; vitamin 03, 110,000 IU; and cerelose to 5kg). 25 Preparation of Tissue Microsomes Rats were sacrificed by decapitation and microsomes were obtained by a modification of the method of Fang and Strobel (116). Colons were excised at the ileal-cecal junction and the rectum, and small intestines were excised at the pyloric sphincter. The tissues were rinsed with tap water and then with a 154 mM NaCl, 1 mM dithiothreitol solution, weighed, and placed in ice-cold Tris buffer (10 mM, pH 7.4) containing 140 mM KCl, 10 mM EDTA, 1 mM dithiothreitol, and 0.25 mM phenyLmethylsulfonylfluoride. Livers were removed, blotted, weighed, and placed in ice-cold Tris buffer. All tissues were homogenized in a Polytron tissue homogenizer (Brinknan, Westbury, NY) and centrifuged at 8,500g for 6 min. The supernatant was centrifuged at 105,000g for 60 min to obtain the microsomal pellet. The pellet was resuspended in 0.25 M sucrose, 10 mM EDTA solution and stored at -40°. Enzyme Assays The fluorometric assay for aryl hydrocarbon hydroxylase (AHH) was perfbrmed as described by Nebert and Gelboin (120). The reaction mixture, in a total volume of 1.0 m1, contained 50 umoles Tris buffer, pH 7.5, 0.36 umole NADPH, 3 umoles MgClZ, 0.8 mg bovine serum albumin, 75 nmoles benzo(a)pyrene (BP) and 200-600 ug microsomal protein. The mixture was incubated with shaking at 37° for 30 min (unless otherwise specified). The reaction was stopped by addition of 1.0 ml cold acetone. BP metabo- lites were extracted in 3.25 ml hexane by shaking fer 10 min at 37°. A 1.0 ml aliquot of the organic phase was extracted with 3.0 m1 of l N NaOH which had been previously extracted with benzene to remove fluorescent contaminants. After centrifugation, BP metabolites in the alkali phase 26 were measured spectrofluorometrically with excitation at 396 nm and emission at 522 nm. Blank values, obtained for each tissue by addition of acetone to the reaction mixture before incubation, were subtracted from reported values. The radioactive assay for AHH was performed by a modification of the method of VanCanfort et al. (121). The reaction mixture, in a total volume of 0.5 ml, contained the same reagents described for the fluorometric assay 3H BP (0.116 uCi/ug) substituted for the at 50% the level described, with unlabeled BP. After incubation at 37° for 30 min with shaking the reaction was stopped with 1.0 ml KOH (0.15 M in 85% DMSO). The unmetabolized BP was extracted in 5.0 m1 hexane by mechanical shaking for 5 min. After centrifugation the upper and interphases were removed and the sample was re-extracted with hexane. A 0.5 ml aliquot of the aqueous phase was neutralized with HCl, brought up in 20 ml Triton-toluene scintillation cocktail (1:2; 4 g 2.5-diphenyloxazole, 0.6 g 1,2-bis [2(4-methyl-5- phenylazoxyl)] and counted by liquid scintillation spectrometry. Blank values were obtained by addition of KOH to the reaction mixture before incubation. Protein concentrations were determined by the method of Lowry et al. (122). Ames Test The Ames test was perfOrmed according to the standard procedure described by Ames et al. (123) using the S-9 fraction from the colon, small intestine, and liver from rats fed the various diets. To obtain the S-9 fractions, tissues were homogenized in 3 volumes of 0.15 M KCl, centrifuged at 9,000g for 10 min, and the supernatant was collected. The fractions were frozen at -40° until analysis. The procedure was carried out as 27 previously described using Salmonella typhimurium strain TA 100. S-9 fractions were tested at several protein concentrations, and the level resulting in maximum number of revertants was used fer subsequent assays. Isolation of Colonic Epithelial Cells Epithelial cells were isolated from colons of experimental rats as described by Skrypec and Bennink (124). The colon was removed, flushed with a 154 mM NaCl, 1 mM dithiothreitol solution and tied at the ends with thread to hold the solutions required fer dissociation of the epithelial cells. Residual intestinal contents were removed by solution A (1.5 mM KCl, 96 mM NaCl, 27 mM Na3C6HSO7, 8 mM KH2P04, 5.6 mM NaZHPO4, pH 7.3) by incubation at 37° for 15 min. The mitotically active epithelial cells were dissociated by solution B (phosphate buffered saline, Ca and Mg free, 1.5 mM EDTA, 0.5 mM dithiothreitol) by incubation at 37° for 52 min. The colon was rinsed twice with phosphate buffered saline to obtain the maximum number of cells. The solutions were combined and cells were collected by centrifugation. The cells were then immersed in culture medium [CMRL- 1066 with glutamine (GIBCO)] supplemented with 5 mg/ml glucose, 0.05 mg/ml fetal bovine serum, 125 U/ml penicillin, 125 meg/m1 streptomycin, 2 meg/ml amphotericin, 0.67 mcg/ml hydrocortisone, and 10 mM minimal essential median nonessential amino acids. Cell Cultures Isolated epithelial cells were incubated with BP for 24 hours by addition of l ug/ml 3H BP (0.116 uCi/ug) to the media. BP metabolism was determined by analyzing a 5.0 ml aliquot of the media according to the method of VanCanfort et al. (121) described above. 28 Binding of BP to Cellular Macromolecules 3n BP (0.2 uCi/ng, dissolved in so ul methanol) Rats were given 50 ng in 2 ml saline by gavage 12 to 48 hours before sacrifice. The tissues were removed, rinsed thoroughly with water, and homogenized in 3 volumes of water. Cellular macromolecules were isolated from an aliquot of the homogenized tissues using a series of extractions. Cellular macromolecules were precipitated twice with ice cold 10% trichloroacetic acid. The pre- cipitate was washed twice with ice cold 1% potassium acetate in ethanol to remove lecithins, twice with ethanol:chloroform (3:1,v:v) and once each with ethanol:diethy1 ether (3:1,v:v) and diethyl ether to remove remaining lipids (125). The resulting precipitate was solubilized by addition of NCS tissue solubilizer (Amersham, Arlington Heights, 11.) and heating at 50° for 12 hr with shaking. The solubilized sample was neutralized with HCl, added to 20 ml Triton-toluene scintillation cocktail described above and counted by liquid scintillation spectrometry. In another study epithelial cells were isolated (as described above) from experimental rats which had been administered 3H BP by gavage. The cells were solubi- lized and counted as described above. Isolation of DNA DNA was isolated from the tissues of rats intubated with 3 H BP by phenol extraction as described by Jernstrom et al. (126). DNA was quanti- tated on a Gilfbrd Spectrophotometer (Model 240; Gilford Instrument Laboratories, Oberlin, Ohio) with absorbance at 260 nm. DNA.was resuspended in water and binding of BP to DNA was determined by liquid scintillation spectrometry as described above. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION The purpose of these studies was to develop a model system to study dietary-induced alterations in intestinal metabolism of potentially toxic agents entering the body. In this model system charcoal-broiled hamburger (CBH) was chosen as the source of dietary xenobiotics and benzo(a)pyrene (BP) metabolism was chosen as the model for microsomal xenobiotic metabolism. AHH activities in the colon, small intestine, and liver of rats fed diets containing CBH were compared to AHH activities in tissues from rats fed purified diets. Enzyme Activity Results from rats pretreated with B-naphthoflavone, an inducer of AHH, showed that B? metabolism (according to the fluorometric assay) was linear both with time (up to 40 min; Fig. 3) and with protein concentra- tion (up to 600 ug of microsomal protein/reaction; Fig. 4). Freezing the microsomes did not affect enzyme activity. The fluorometric and radioactive assays produced similar results (Fig. 5) and were consistent between studies. The difference in liver AHH activity between control and CBH-fed rats was greater when measured by fluorometry than by radioactivity, whereas in the colon and small intestine the difference in dietary-induced AHH activity was greater when measured by radioactivity. These results may reflect differences in the metabolites produced, as the fluorometric assay measures primarily 3-hydroxy BP, while the radioative assay measures all metabolites of BP. 29 30 .ooemeeomm oeomoo meme o>emmooonm m How Hflo once :a apnwaoz zoos wx\me owu oco>efimonpnmm:-m mo :ofipooncw Housepfinomeupew one eo>aooon mama gouache .oefih :oHueQSUGH op eopmfiem mm moEomoeoez :oHou :H xufl>fluo< omefixxonpaz :onaeoonpx: HxHfimmoooom m How Hflo :hoo ca npcmfloz Avon wx\me owv oco>efimonpcmecum mo :ofluoomcw Heocopfieommeucfl oeo eo>aooou meme woumoee .eoflpeepeooeou ewouoam on moEomoeofiz :oHou :fi xufi>flpo< omeaxxonexm conumoouvx: HxH< mo magm:0HpmHom .e oezmflm 33 a: :: exec 2.92;.— emv =8 e...— :— ..ofizou 4 «— HEmE e um os/suln canoasaronlj 34 .m.mH .mcwaeufl> one mfienocfia .oumuexnooeeo mm.oe .cfiouoem “H.om omega mo.mm .oespmfloe ”may :ofipfimomeoo .uowe nomnsoemn pofifiononfieooneeuo .o.wo .mcfleepfl> one mHenoeflE .openvxconemo .o.nH .ceopoem mo.m .efimfia mm.HH easemeoa ”may :oapmeQEou .pofie Hoepeoue .xpfi>fluo< ommexonpx: :onnmooepz: Hze< co Homeooewm poafloennaeooeenu weapoom mo uoommm .m beamed 35 m0 m0 j Loop 13 Icon low @- 18. :8 mm 58 18.. .md -8 1m m.“ r é mm .3 mm m + 198 mm 18 I 83.0 82 0532:. a 1 2 =25. L89. + :28. L8 >59 m>=o59 2:520:63“. mm 09 [Ulilmd 5m [mun ooueomonu 36 Because the direction and degree of response showed a high correlation (r2=0.92) between the two assays, only the results of the radioactive assay will be presented for the remaining studies (with the exception of one study for which only the results of the fluorometric assay are available). Feeding the CBH diet resulted in significantly increased AHH activity in the colon, small intestine, and liver (Fig. 5). These diets also resulted in small intestinal and liver hyperplasia (Table 2). Small intestine weight was approximately 1.6 times the control and liver weight was approximately 1.5 times the control when expressed per gram of body weight. Colon weight was increased in rats fed the CBH diet, but these differences were not significant. Due to this hyperplasia, the differ- ences 32.!itrg_BP metabolism which are expressed per mg protein in these studies are even greater when expressed on an organ weight basis. Enzyme activity in colon and small intestinal microsomes from rats fed the control diet was minimal. Liver microsomes from rats fed the control diet metabolized BP in_!itrg_indicating the presence of constitu- tive enzyme in this tissue. This is supported by previous studies on cyt P448 activity in livers from non-induced experimental animals (127). When the CBH diet was fed, the colon and small intestine had marked increases in in vitrg metabolism of BP over control levels. Livers from rats fed the CBH diet showed a 3 to S-fold increase in enzyme activity. It is probable that the CBH contained high levels of compounds which are normally metabolized by microsomal cyt P enzyme pathways resulting in 448 significant induction of AHH. These results indicate that the liver has a moderate basal level of AHH activity which can be increased by exposure to environmental xenobiotics, while the colon and small intestine have 37 Table 2.--Hyperp1asia of the Liver, Small Intestine and Colon of Rats Fed Charcoal-broiled Hamburger. Organ Weight(g)/100 g Body Wgt Small Colon Intestine Liver Study A (175-200 g rats) Control 0.68:0.03 3.42:0.16 5.04:0.13 can 0.73:0.06 5.24:0.20a 7.11:0.17a Study B (225-250 g rats) Control 0.47:0.02 2.64:0.11 4.36:0.24 can 0.55:0.02 4.29:0.17a 6.84:0.19a 8Significantly different from control (P<0.05). 38 very low basal levels of AHH, but respond to xenobiotic exposure by dra- matically increasing microsomal metabolism, The time required to induce AHH with CBH feeding and the time necessary for enzyme activity to return to control levels when rats were refed the control diet are shown in Figure 6. Enzyme activity was in- creased in all tissues by feeding the CBH diet for two to four days, or after consumption of 20 to 50 g of diet. In the liver maximal AHH activity was reached by consuming the CBH diet for four days. When rats were refed the control diet, liver enzyme activity returned to control levels within three days. Enzyme induction was also maximal by four days in the small intestine, but return of enzyme activity to control levels required five days of refeeding the control diet. The colon was the slowest tissue to adapt to dietary-induced changes in AHH activity. IE zitgg BP metabolism was maximal by the tenth day of CBH consumption and return to control levels required five days of refeeding the control diet. Since enzyme activity in the colon adapted to refeeding the control diet similarly to the small intestine, the slower rate of adaption in the colon was not due solely to the time required for the dietary constituents to reach this tissue. Figure 7 shows a dose-response curve for the level of CBH in the diet and in XEEEE BP metabolism. AHH activity was directly proportional to and showed high linear correlation with the level of CBH in the diet for the colon (r2=0.99), small intestine (r2=0.97), and liver (r2=0.85). The lower coefficient of determination in the liver resulted from maximal stimulation of enzyme activity in this tissue at a lower level of CBH in the diet. Based on the high correlation between tissue microsomal enzyme activity and the level of CBH in the diet it can be concluded that it was 39 .mxoos N How peep Hoeucoo one pow much mo mosmmflu Eoem >ue>fiuom ommaxxoauxn :onemoonex: axed mucomoamou o Sea .mHo>oq Monacou op ensued one composecH ommfixxopex: coneeoonexm Hx9< How wouwsvoa oaflh .o mesmam 40 0 zoo m> pee maenocfisu.oumuexgooneo mm.oo .aeoooeo mo.H~ .omoee me.o~ .oosomeoa "flee eoeoomooaou .ooao emu ea zmo com mm m-o mo compouwpmoam one on one .nocom.ue open you owe oH pownm mowupem au av Homnsnae: eoHAMueemv .m.e~ .mcwaeuw> one mHmHocwa .oueuexsonnmo me.m~ .cflouonm mm.mH .ewmwa mm.n~ .eaaumwoa Harv :owuwmomaou .uofip man a“ :mu mo ucwfloz Hence How pounuaumosm goueumehoo amao .e.me .meeaoue> one mfioeoeea .ooeaoacooeoo “H.e~ .ewouoed me.o~ .eedefi mm.mH .onSHmwoa umwv :owpwmomeou .uofip :mu ca :mu mo ucmwoz Hence you peanufiumnom goaepmehoo wane .n.mo .mceeeufi> pee maeuocfis .ouenvznonneo mo.~H .cwouonm me.m .ewmwa "H.0H .onzumeos "flay :ofiuwmoQEOU .uoflv mmu a“ mac mo ucwfloz Hence Hem popspwumnom :oneumcaoo anon .uofin on» we 9:09:00 Homnnoeem ou popeaom mm Suw>wuo< ommfixxonvx: :ooneoonex: Hxh< .h ousufim RADIOACTIVE ASSAY 42 3W .—F~ I a D liver "F" Al I I L l J l J § § § § § § § 1- 1- Illlll oz [ulelold 6m [puzuoqeloul 49 Du 50°/ob 75%° P-F Had level at hamburger In dlel 25%"11 O 43 the CBH which caused AHH induction in these three tissues. However, it is not clear what factors within the CBH are responsible for the increase in enzyme activity. AHH induction in the tissues of rats fed diets containing 88% pan- fried hamburger (P-F HB; Fig. 7) varied when compared to induction in rats fed diets containing 88% CBH (Fig. 5). In the P-F HB-fed rats enzyme in- duction in the liver and small intestine was similar to that in CBH-fed rats. In the colon, feeding the P-F HB diet produced a lower level of induction than did feeding the CBH diet. This difference in enzyme in- duction may represent differences in the level and type of pyrolysis products produced by pan-frying the hamburger. To determine whether it was the meat itself or agents produced when the meat was cooked which induced AHH, rats were fed a diet containing uncooked hamburger which had been extracted with hexane and acetone to produce a moisture and lipid content comparable to the CBH. Results from the fluorometric assay fer the colon and small intestine are presented in Figure 8. Feeding the raw meat diet did not increase enzyme activity over control levels fer any of the tissues examined. This indicates that it was cooking the meat which resulted in production of compounds which induce microsomal metabolism. It also shows that differences in dietary protein per se are not responsible fer the induced AHH activity observed with feeding CBH. Analysis of foods which have been cooked by various techniques have shown readily detectable levels of BP and other PAH in charcoal-broiled meats (57,64,67,68). To determine the effects of feeding isolated PAH on enzyme activity, the addition of two levels of BP to the experimental diets was examined. Addition of BP (0.1 mg BP/g of diet) to the control diet 44 .onoHH one onnNNm .mr .eene “Home one anode .w\ne man. + new ”meme one meson .nnu tonne one eeenm .M\nn one. + u tonne one nnennm .m\nn one. + u «anew one meeom .u "one: new ennee enmeoz one “we nonennnenoo ooon .m.mH .mnfiaopo> one mHononHe .ouonoxnenneo ”H.0o .noopenm mo.m~ .owmflfi mo.m~ .onnumoea "meg neopomenneo .uooo :mu no :mu new m: npxo me nonunpoumonm one on one .zmu onu ep oHnenomneo unopneo ofimoa one onnpmnen o oonoenm ea onouooe one onoxon noes ooueenuxo Howannnon some .xuo>opo< omefixxeno»: neoneoenoxm H>H< no ononznmeveenom Someone me ueomwm .w onnwfim FLUOROMETRIC ASSAY Intestine fl small 1 45 l unu oz [amend 6m [mun 00000801011” 10- a BP/g c +.1 mg 0+.5 mg CBH CBH +.1 mg extr. HB BP/g BP/g C 46 significantly increased ipuyitgg' BP metabolism in the colon and small intestine (Fig. 8). Enzyme induction was not as great as that seen with feeding CBH even though the level of BP added was probably greater than the level of BP in the CBH diet. Additional BP (0.5 mg BP/g of diet) did not cause a greater increase in 32 yitrg_metabolism by colon microsomes. Enzyme activities were not increased by addition of BP to the CBH diet. In the study of Clinton et al. (128), addition of BP (1.0 mg BP/g of diet) to a purified diet also increased AHH activity in the small intestine, but enzyme levels were higher than levels reported here. It is not clear whether this difference in results is due to differences in experimental techniques or whether enzyme activity would have been greater if a higher level of BP had been fed. Based on the results from my study alone, it appears that there is a maximum level to which AHH can be induced by feeding BP alone, but the presence of other inducing factors in the diet, as would occur in the CBH, can produce greater levels of AHH activity. This is supported by the study of Gielen and Nebert (129). These investi- gators obtained an additive effect for in XEEEE AHH induction in cultured liver cells when either phenobarbital or 2,2-bis(p-chloropheny1)-1,1,l- trichloroethane (p,p'-DDT) was present with a PAH, but not when two PAH nor when phenobarbital and p,p'-DDT were combined. In my study, the extent of enzyme induction after feeding a mixture of inducing agents may be maximal, and therefore, enzyme activity was not increased by feeding additional amounts of one of the inducing components (BP). It has been proposed that the occurrence of PAH in charcoal-broiled meats results from fats dripping down onto the hot coals and producing pyrolysis products which rise in the smoke to condense on the surface of the grilled meat (67). To assess the importance of fat content in 47 hamburger on the production of inducing compounds, hamburger with varying levels of fat was charcoal-broiled and fed to rats (Fig. 9). There was high linear correlation between enzyme activity and the level of fat in the hamburger for the colon (r2=0.97) and small intestine (r2=0.96). Liver enzyme activity also increased with higher fat levels in the ham- burger, but the coefficient of determination was lower (r2=0.6l) due to maximal stimulation of enzyme activity in this tissue at a lower percentage of fat in the hamburger. These results support the concept that fat in hamburger is one of the major substrates fer pyrolysis leading to ferma- tion of xenobiotics in CBH. Consumption of diets containing heated fats was not sufficient to induce microsomal metabolism in the manner seen with feeding CBH (Fig. 10). When the drippings from the pan-fried hamburger of the earlier study replaced cornstarch in the control diet to comprise 20% of the total diet, in XEEIQ.BP metabolism increased in the colon, but not in the small intestine or liver. Diets containing beef tallow which had been pan-fried at conditions similar to the pan-frying of the hamburger, or beef tallow which was held at 180° for 150 hrs did not increase enzyme activity above control levels for any of the tissues tested. These results are in support of the findings of Rappaport et a1. (68). In their studies, when ground meat was cooked at high temperatures in open or closed systems, greater than 90% of the mutagens fermed were volatilized into the air. The level of PAH in meats cooked in closed systems was significantly higher than in meats cooked in open systems. In my study, a high percentage of the compounds which result in AHH induction were probably volatilized under the conditions of both pan-frying and charcoal- broiling. In charcoal-broiling the volatilized components which rose in 48 .meen one onenme .eme tonne one eenem .emm tonne one memmm .em “None one oeomm .u "one: new ennem oneees one new noeonnnenoo ooon .o.nH .mnonepo> one maenonon .oueeoxnenneo “n.em .nneeoen an.o~ .oenen m~.ee .oenoeeon ”noeoneonnou .eoeo one no one nee: nonenoeoenne one on one .mnofifienouaoeenone onomon pom wmo nomeneo op zeHHou woos ooooe no“: Homnnnaomn .m.oH .mnoeouo> one maeaonon .oponoxneonno. mo.mm .noouenn an.o .ofinwfi mo.mm .onnpmoen "neopflmemneu .uooo :mo no :mu nun: nomenpopm room one on one .mnfifioennuaoeoneno onemoo pom em nfiopneo op onexon new: ooueonuxo nowannnemo .xufi>opo< omofixxonoxm nonnooenox: H>n< no nomnnnnem no Ho>og you me poommm .m enamom 49 39.552. 5 =3 .e .03. Horne can“ erm >F0ene e oom "newpomemneu .uooo u no noneumnneo we unmooz Hence new oounpwumonm an omH .oowH we oHon zefifieu moon aowo .o>eoe e oom "newuomenneu .uowo u no nonoumnnee me unmwoz Hence Hem oounuoumonm an: N .ooomu reflfieu moon oooHMunom acme .o.~m .mnoneuo> one mHenonoa .ouenoxnennee no.5H .nwouenn mo.- .ownofi mo.m Honeymoon "may neopwmenneu .uowo o no noeeumnnee me unwooz Hence new oounuoumnnm nonhuman: ooonmnnon nenm manomnono new acme .xuo>ouo< omofixxenoxm nonnooenoxz th< no menu ooueo: mnoooom we ueomwm .ofi enamom 51 :3 Our—OM? mm: n—afl .8. .2 an. a... 52. .e. E I! re >FO one mfienonon .ouenoxnenneo “H.5m .noopenn mm.oH noonwa mm.m~ .onnumoen "neoufimemneo .uooo :mu no Inc we unmfloz Amoco new oounuopmonm none neon: wage ..o>ene e oou "nefiuwmenneu .pooo :mu no man we usage: Hence new oounufiumonm omeHnHHoo wean .o.wo .mnfinouo> one mHenonon .ouenoxnenneo no.5H .nwouenm mo.N .ofinfifi mm.- .onnumoen “neouomenneu .uowo :mu no :mu me unwooz Hence Hem ooanpopmnnm anon awaomHn *oHe .xuo>wpo< omefixxeeoxz neonoeenokz HxH< no meannem Henna mnewno> unwooom me ueommm .HH onnmom RADIOACTIVE ASSAY , small " Intestine 12M- 54 g g 0 51’1’1’7/////////////////// CBH +- C-t-celb -F c +aIF° S 0 liver 0 l L §§§ 150 1050 l- 900 h- 750 liltfl oz [Ulflimd bur linoleum“: ea 6" 55 When wheat bran replaced 10% of the CBH in the CBH diet the expected decrease in microsomal metabolism did not occur. Instead enzyme activity increased in the small intestine and remained the same in the colon and liver even though less meat was fed. These results are in contrast to the findings of Clinton et al. (128). When they added 10% wheat bran to a purified diet containing 1 mg BP/g diet, AHH activity in the small intestine was significantly lower than when wheat bran was not present in the BP diet. In their study colon and liver enzyme activities were not reported. It is probable that feeding an isolated xenobiotic in a purified diet results in more specific enzyme induction than does feeding a diet containing a mixture of xenobiotics. When rats consumed the CBH diet numerous enzyme pathways were probably induced to metabolize the various compounds to which the tissues were exposed. Thus, it is plausible that wheat bran added to the CBH diet did not lower AHH activity, while addition of wheat bran to a purified diet containing BP did lower AHH activity. The mechanism by which wheat bran decreased AHH activity in the study of Clinton et al. (128) probably involved a decrease in the absorption of BP which would be beneficial to the host. However it is not clear whether wheat bran had a specific effect in decreasing AHH activity independent of carcinogen absorption. If so, addition of wheat bran to a diet containing agents which are metabolized by AHH may not benefit the host. Decreased AHH activity could decrease conversion of xenobiotics to forms which can be excreted from the body. The proposed benefits of fiber in relation to colon cancer probably come from its action in diluting the concentration of potential carcinogens, decreasing intestinal transit time, and 56 decreasing carcinogen absorption rather than any possible direct action on AHH activity. The combined results of the time-induction study, the dose response study, and the study with varying levels of fat in the hamburger provide insight to differences in enzyme response of the colon, small intestine, and liver to dietary xenobiotics. Upon exposure to compounds capable of inducing AHH, liver enzymes respond rapidly with lower levels of inducing compounds in the diet. On the other hand, enzyme response in the colon and small intestine is slower and requires higher levels of inducing agents to reach maximum. However, the relative change in enzyme activity between the control and the induced colon and small intestine is many times greater than the relative change in the liver. A principal function of the liver is to metabolize xenobiotics, so it is able to carry out this function with moderate changes in enzyme activity. However, in other tissues, such as the colon and small intestine, drug metabolism is not a principal function. In these tissues enzyme systems must adapt dramatically to handle increased exposure to compounds which require metabolism to be excreted from the body. Cell Cultures To determine whether microsomal metabolism was representative of whole cell metabolism under the conditions of these studies, an in XEEEQ system was devised to measure BP metabolism in isolated colon epithelial cells. Using the technique developed in our laboratory (124), epithelial cells were isolated from the colon of rats fed the control or the CBH diet fer two weeks. Cells were cultured and incubated with 3H BP for 24 hours. Results are shown in Table 3. Colon epithelial cells from 57 Table 3.--Benzo(a)pyrene Metabolism by Isolated Colonic Epithelial Cells. ug BP metabolized/24 hrs Control 0.76:0.05 CBH 1. 1720.04ail aSignificantly different from control (P<0.05). rats fed the CBH diet produced a greater level of BP metabolites than did cells from rats fed the control diet. The higher level of BP metabolites may have been due to an increase in the number or viability of cells or due to increased metabolism by the same number of viable cells. Regard- less of the reason for increased metabolism, the results of this study support the results of the previous studies, although the magnitude of response was not as great as that seen in the microsomal incubations. The importance of the alterations in enzyme activity which has been described in these studies is not well-defined. AHH induction can serve two opposing roles. As a normal mechanism of drug metabolism, increased AHH activity allows for conversion of fereign compounds to metabolites which can be excreted from the body. This results in decreased toxicity. However, many of the metabolites produced through AHH activity are more toxic or more carcinogenic than the parent compound. Thus, increased AHH activity may also increase toxicity. Ames Test To assess the importance of the enzyme alterations produced, in_vitro mutagenicity of the BP metabolites produced by microsomes from tissues of 58 rats fed the control or the CBH diet and rats which were pretreated with B-naphthoflavone was determined (Table 4). Native BP is not mutagenic in the Ames test, but microsomes from induced mammalian tissues can convert BP to derivatives which are mutagenic. Pretreatment of rats with Aroclor 1254 induces liver enzyme activity and results in production of mutagenic metabolites when microsomes from this tissue are incubated with BP in the Ames test. In these studies BP activation by liver S-9 fractions from rats pretreated with Aroclor 1254 was used as a positive control. As can be seen from Table 4, liver microsomes from Aroclor-pretreated rats metabolized BP to highly mutagenic products. When the S-9 fractions from the colon, small intestine, and liver of rats fed the CBH diet'were incubated with BP, there was no increase in activation of BP to mutagenic derivatives compared to rats fed the control diet. The S-9 fraction from the liver of rats pretreated with B-naphthoflavone produced more revertants than the S-9 fraction from control rats. S-9 fractions from colon and small intestinal tissues produced a similar number of revertants for control rats and rats pretreated with B-naphthoflavone. These results are in contrast to the findings of Fang and Strobel (116,117). In their studies the S-9 fraction from the colon of rats pretreated with B-naphthoflavone was incubated with BP and strain TA 100 in the Ames test, and there was a four-fold increase in the number of revertants produced over revertants produced by colon microsomes from control rats. The difference in results between these two studies was not due to differences in S-9 protein concentrations, as several protein levels were assayed in my studies, and the level producing the maximum number of revertants per plate was used. The reason for this discrepancy in results is not clear. 59 Table 4.--Activation of Benzo(a)pyrene by Colon, Small Intestine and Liver S-9 Fractions. Revertants/mg S-9 Protein Colon Small Intestine Liver Control 44 1 9a 41 t 7 37 t 6 can 53 t 13 47 t 10 51 t s B-naphthoflavone 37 t 12 40 t 6 190 t 18b Aroclor 956 2 104b aMean t SE for at least 5 separate determinations. Values cor- rected for spontaneous revertants. bSignificantly different from control (P<0.01). 60 The results from this study indicate that the metabolites which are produced specifically by tissue microsomes from rats fed the CBH diet are not mutagenic in 11332, However, in colon cancer the colon microflora may play a prominent role in metabolism of compounds which enter the colon. This makes it especially important to also investigate in X312 test systems related to potential mutagenicity or carcinogenicity. Binding of BP to Cellular Macromolecules One of the important concepts for initiation of carcinogenesis is the binding of carcinogens to cellular marcomolecules. There is a high corre- lation between carcinogenesis and binding of carcinogens to DNA (10-12). To measure this parameter rats were given 3 H BP by gavage 12 to 48 hours before sacrifice to assay binding of BP to cellular macromolecules. Binding varied with time (Fig. 12), and was maximal at 24 hours. Figures 13 and 14 show the amount of BP bound per organ and the amount of BP bound per gram of tissue at 24 hours. Tissues from rats fed the CBH diet bound significantly more BP than tissues from rats fed the control diet. Colons from all rats bound more BP than small intestines or livers. When DNA was isolated from colons and livers which bound BP no radio- activity could be detected. This indicates that binding was non-specific and may explain why BP does not act as a carcinogen for these tissues. Formation of adducts with non-critical target sites may represent a mechanism of removal of BP in these cells. However, if metabolism of compounds which do act as colon carcinogens is affected by diet in the same manner as BP metabolism, the alterations in enzyme activity may result in binding to DNA in addition to binding to RNA and/or protein. The extent of BP binding to RNA and/or protein was not consistent with AHH activity for either the CBH-fed rats or rats which had been 61 Figure 12. Binding of Benzo(a)pyrene to Cellular Macromolecules in Tissues of Rats Fed Charcoal-broiled Hamburger. aNanograms of BP bound to cellular macromolecules per organ. 62 12' 24 48 7//////A 7//// iNTESTINE _ SMALL fl LIVER IICOLON 4 m 12 24 48 HOURS 63 Figure 13. Effect of Feeding Charcoal-broiled Hamburger and Pretreatment with B-naphthoflavone on Binding of Benzo(a)pyrene to Cellular Macromolecules I. aNanograms of BP bound to cellular macromolecules per organ at 24 hours. noBP‘ 1.8 1.5 I colon email Intestine liver control CBH 65 Figure 14. Effect of Feeding Charcoal-broiled Hamburger and Pretreatment with B-naphthoflavone on Binding of Benzo(a)pyrene to Cellular Macromolecules 11. aNanograms of BP bound to cellular macromolecules per tissue at 24 hours. no BP/o oi tissue a d b .5 .N d o O 66 I colon . small intestine U liver control CBH 67 pretreated with B-napthoflavone. Pretreatment with B-napthoflavone results in maximum enzyme induction in colons approximately 1.5 times the level of induction with feeding CBH. The colon from rats pretreated with B--napthoflavone bound more BP than did the colon from rats fed the CBH diet. In the small intestine and liver pretreatment with B-naphthoflavone results in enzyme activity comparable to that feund with feeding CBH. These tissues from rats pretreated with B-napthoflavone bound signifi- cantly less BP than tissues from CBH-fed rats. With differences in repair rates between colons, small intestines, and livers, and the probable presence of more than one type of inducer in CBH, it was not unexpected to see differences between AHH activity and binding of BP to cellular macromolecules at 24 hours. By 48 hours after intubation the level of binding decreased for all tissues (Fig. 12), probably due to further repair of RNA and/or protein. The higher level of binding of BP to RNA or protein in the colon indicates that more reactive intermediates may have been exposed to the colon than to other tissues. It is possible that these intermediates were produced from interaction between tissue AHH and activity of colon microflora. Conjugated metabolites produced in the liver and excreted via the bile enter the colon where they are exposed to colon microflora. Activity by the microorganisms in the colon can result in deconjugation of the compounds, exposing epithelial cells of the colon to the uncon- jugated metabolite. The role of diet in this scheme could be two-fold. As shown in these studies, diet can alter AHH activity in all tissues examined. The altera- tions in enzyme activity produced by long-term exposure to dietary xeno- biotics may be such that the metabolites produced are more reactive before 68 conjugation. This could be due to long-term modifications in activating and detoxifying pathways. Arnott et a1. (18) feund that livers from male rats induced with hydrocarbon produced different profile of BP metabolites than livers from non-induced animals. Prior induction resulted in higher levels of proximate carcinogens, whereas in non-induced animals primarily detoxified derivatives of BP were produced. Secondly, it has been shown (92,101,102) that high fat, high meat diets can increase B-glucuronidase activity of the colon microbial popula- tion. The conjugated metabolites entering the colon from the liver in rats on this type of diet could be more susceptible to deconjugation. This would result in increased exposure of colon epithelial cells to reactive intermediates. The importance of this scheme could be deter- mined by use of model carcinogens which are capable of producing cancer in the colon. In summary, these studies have shown that intestinal metabOlism of BP, and presumably other xenobiotics, can be influenced by dietary modifi- cations. AHH activity can be rapidly increased in the colon, small intestine, and liver by feeding CBH, and the level of enzyme induction is related to both the level of fat in the hamburger before charcoal-broiling, and the total level of CBH in the diet. AHH induction is probably due to retention in the CBH of volatilized pyrolysis products produced at the cooking surface. Enzyme activity appears to reach maximal levels upon exposure to a.mixture of inducing agents and is minimally affected by dietary fiber at the dietary levels used in this study. The alterations in AHH activity produced by feeding CBH do not result in increased acti- vation of BP to mutagenic derivatives in the Ames test, but do modify 69 binding of BP by RNA and/or protein but not by DNA in the colon, small intestine and liver. Conclusions These studies have contributed to three areas of colon cancer research: (1) It has been shown that diet can alter at least one drug-metabolizing system, and it is probable that others are affected also. (2) A role for dietary xenobiotics (in this case coming from CBH) in colon cancer has been suggested. It is hypothesized that repeated exposure to dietary compounds which induce microsomal metabolism of xenobiotics may, ever a period of time, alter metabolic pathways in such a manner that there is increased susceptibility to colon cancer upon exposure to a given colon carcinogen. (3) A.mode1 fer use in colon cancer research which can be used to study the effects of nutrition on intestinal metabolism of xenobiotics has been described. Within this model system, other sources of xenobiotics could be investigated. By adapting the techniques applied in these studies, this model could be used to study the role of environmental contaminants which enter the body through routes other than diet. Additionally, other pathways of metabolism could be studied by use of different model carcino- gens. Within this context it could be determined whether the principal role for diet in colon cancer is related to the effects of diet on metabo- lism, rather than diet as a source of carcinogenic compounds. REFERENCES l. Schottenfeld, D., and Hass, J. F. "Epidemiology of Colorectal Can- cer." In Lipkin, M. and Good, R. A. (eds.), Gastromtestmal Tract Cancer. New York: Plenum Publ., 1978. 2. Miller, E. C. "Some Current Perspectives on Chemical Carcinogenesis in Humans and Experimental Animals." Cancer Res. 38, 1479-1496, 1978. 3. Berenblum, I. "The Cocarcinogenic Action of Croton Resin." Cancer Res., 1, 44-48, 1941. 4. Friedewald, W. F., and Rous, P. "The Initiating and Promoting Ele- ments in Tumor Production: An Analysis of the Effects of Tar, Benzpyrene, and Methylcholanthrene on Rabbit Skin." J. Exptl. Med., 80, 101-126, 1944. 5. Mottram, J. C. "A Developing Factor in Experimental Blastogenesis." J. Pathol. Bacterial. 56, 181-187, 1944. 6. Weisburger, E. K. "Mechanisms of Chemical Carcinogenesis." Ann. Rev. Toxicol., 18, 395-415, 1978. 7. Heidelberger, C. "Chemical Carcinogenesis." Ann. Rev. Biochem., 44, 79-121. 8. Hecker, E. "Isolation and Characterization of the Cocarcinogenic Principles from Croton Oil." Mech. Cancer Res., 6, 439-484, 1971. 9. Boutwell, R. K. "The Role of Induction of Ornithine Decarboxylase in Tumor Promotion." In Hiatt, H. H., Watson, J. D., and Winston, J. A. (eds.), Origins of Human Cancer, Book B. New York: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, 1977. 10. Braokes, F., and Lawley, P. D. "Evidence fer the Binding of Poly- nuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons to the Nucleic Acids of Mouse Skin: Relation Between Carcinogeneic Power of Hydrocarbons and Their Binding to Deaxyribonucleic Acid." Nature, 202, 781-784, 1964. ll. Chaveau, J., Meunier, M., and Benoit, A. "Binding of Metabolites of Dietary 4-dimethylaminoazabenzene and 2-methy1-4-dimethy1a- minoazabenzene to Rat Liver DNA and Protein of Subcellular Fractions." Int. J. Cancer, 13, 1-8, 1974. 70 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 71 Colburn, N. H., and Boutwell, R. K. "The Binding of B-propiolactone and Some Related Alkylating Agents to DNA, RNA and Protein of Mouse Skin: Relation Between Tumor-initiating Power of Alkylating Agents and their Binding to DNA." Cancer Res. 28, 653-660, 1968. Mintz, B., and Illmensee, K. "Normal Genetically Mosaic Mice Pro- duced from Malignant Teratocarcinoma Cells." Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. US 72, 3583-3589, 1975. Illmensee, K,, and Mintz, B. "Totipatency and Normal Differentatian of Single Teratocarcinoma Cells Cloned by Injection into Blastocysts." Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. US 73, 549-533, 1976. DePierre, J. W., and Ernster, L. "The Metabolism of Polycyclic Hydro- carbons and Its Relationship to Cancer." Biachim. Biophys. Acts., 473, 149-186, 1978. Miller, J. A. "Carcinogenesis by Chemicals: An Overivew." Cancer Res. 3 30, 559-576, 1970. Fahl, W. E., Jefcoate, C. R., and Kasper, C. B. "Characteristics of Benzo(a)pyrene Metabolism and Cytochrome P-450 Heterogeneity to Rat Liver Nuclear Envelope and Comparison to Microsomal Membrane." J. Biol. Chem., 253, 3106-3113, 1978. Arnott, M. S., Yamauchi, T., and Johnston, D. A. "Aryl Hydrocarbon Hydroxylase in Normal and Cancer Populations." In Griffin, C. and Shaw, C. R. (eds.), Carcinogens: Identification and Mechanisms of Action. New York: Raven Press, 1979. Pullman, A., and Pullman, B. "Electronic Structure and Carcinogenic Activity of Aromatic Molecules." Adv. Cancer Res., 3, 117-165, 1955. Levin, W., Wood, A. W., Yagi, H., Dansette, P. M., Jernia, D. M., and Conney, A. H. "Carcinogenicity of Benzo(a)pyrene 4.5-, 7.8-, and 9,10-axides an Mouse Skin." Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci US 73, 243-247, 1976. ' Miller, E. C., and Miller, J. A. "Low Carcinogenicity of the K- region Epoxides of 7-methylbenz (a) anthracene and Benz (a) anthra- cene in the Mouse and Rat." Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med., 124, 915-919, 1967. Sims, P., Gover, P. L., Swaisland, A., Pal, K., and Hewer, A. "Metabolic Activation of Benzo(a)pyrene Proceeds by a Dial- epoxide." Nature, 252, 326-327, 1974. Wislocki, P. G., Weed, A. W., Change, R. L., Levin, W., Yagi, H., Hernandez, 0., Dansette, P. M., Jernia, D. M., and Conney, A. H. "Mutagenicity and Cytotoxicity of Benzo(a)pyrene Arene Oxides, Phenols, Quinanes, and Dihydradiols in Bacterial and Mammalian Cells." Cancer Res. 36, 3350-3357, 1976. 24. 25. 26. 27. 28. 29. 30. 31. 32. 33. 34. 35. 36. 72 Thakker, D. R., Yagi, H., Lu, A. Y. H., Levin, W., Conney, A. H., and Jernia, D. M. Metabolism of Benzo(a)pyrene IV: Conversion of (t)trans-7,8-dihydroxy-7,8-dihydrobenzo(a)pyrene to the Highly Mutagenic 7,8-diol-9,10-epoxides." Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. US 73, 3381-3385, 1976. Osborne, M. R., Beland, F. A., Harvey, R. G., and Brookes, P. "Reaction of (t)-7oBB-dihydroxy 98,108-epoxy-7,8,9,10-tetra- hydrobenzo(a)pyrene with DNA." Inter. J. Cancer, 18, 362-368, 1976. Meehan, T., Straub, K., and Calvin, M. "Benzo(a)pyrene Diol Epoxide Covalently Binds to Deoxyguanosine and Deoxyadenosine in DNA." Nature 269, 726-727, 1977. Hanwalt, P. C., Cooper, P. K., Ganesan, A. K., and Smith, C. A. "DNA Repair in Bacteria and Mbmmalian Cells." Ann. Rev. Bio- chem., 48, 783-836, 1979. Wynder, E. L., and Gori, G. B. "Contribution of the Environment to Cancer Incidence: An Epidemiological Exercise." J. Natl. Cancer Institute, 58, 825-832, 1977. Haenszel, W., and Kurihara, M. "Studies of Japanese Migrants. 1 Mortality from Cancer and Other Diseases among Japanese in the United States." J. Natl. Cancer Inst., 40, 43-68, 1968. Haenszel, W., Kurihara, M., Segi, M., and Lee, R. K. C. "Stomach Cancer among Japanese in Hawaii." J. Natl Cancer Inst., 49, 969-988, 1972. Conference on Nutrition in the Causation of Cancer. Cancer Res., 35, 1975. Clinton, 8. K., Truex, C. R., and Visek, W. J. "Dietary Protein, Aryl Hydrocarbon Hydroxylase and Chemical Carcinogenesis in Rats." J. Nutr., 109, 55-62, 1979. Madhavan, T. V., and Gopalan, C. "The Effect of Dietary Protein on Carcinogenesis of Aflatoxin." Arch. Pathol., 85, 133-137, 1968. Hayes, J. R., and Campbell, T. C. "Nutrition as a Modifier of Chemical Carcinogenesis." In Slaga, T. G. (ed.), Carcinogene- sis, vol. 5: Modifers of Chemical Carcinogenesis. New York: Raven Press, 1980. Campbell, T. C., and Hayes, J. R. "The Effect of Quantity and Quality of Dietary Protein on Drug Metabolism." Fed. Proc., 35, 2470-2474, 1976. Woodcock, B. G., and Wood, G. C. "Effect of Protein-free Diet on UDP-glucuronyl Transferase and Sulfotransferase Activities in Rat Liver." Biochem. Pharmacol., 20, 2703-2713, 1971. 37. 38. 39. 40. 41. 42. 43. 44. 45. 46. 47. 48. 73 Erikkson, M., Catz, C., and Yaffe, S. J. "Effect on Weanling Mal- nutrition upon Hepatic Drug Metabolism." Biol. Neonate., 27, 339-351, 1975. Bansal, B., Rhoads, J. E., and Bansal, S. C. "Effects of Diet on Colon Carcinogenesis and the Immune System in Rats Treated with 1,2-dimethy1hydrazine." Cancer Res., 38, 3293-3303, 1978. Benson, J., Lev, M., and Girand, C. G. "Enhancement of Mammary Fibroadenomas in the Female Rat by a High Fat Diet." Cancer Res., 16, 135-137, 1956. Carroll, K. K., and Khor, H. T. "Effects of Dietary Fat and Dose Level of 7,12-dimethy1-benz(a)anthracene on Mammary Tumor Incidence in Rats." Cancer Res., 30, 2260-2264, 1970. Gammal, E. B., Carroll, K. K., and Plunkett, E. R. "Effects of Dietary Fat on Mammary Carcinogenesis by 7,12-dimethy1-benz- (a)anthracene in Rats." Cancer Res., 27, 1737-1742, 1967. Reddy, B. S., Narisawa, T., Vukusich, D., Weisburger, J. H., and Wynder, E. L. "Effect of Quality and Quantity of Dietary Fat and Dimethylhydrazine in Colon Carcinogenesis in Rats." Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med., 151, 237-239, 1976. Reddy, B. S., Narisawa, T., and Weisburger, J. H. "Effect of a Diet with High Levels of Protein and Fat on Colon Carcinogene- sis in F 344 Rats Treated with 1,2-dimethy1hydrazine." J. Natl. Cancer Inst., 57, 567-569, 1976. Reddy, B. S., Watanabe, K., Weisburger, J. H., and Wynder, E. L. "Promoting Effect of Bile Acids in Colon Carcinogenesis in Germ-Free and Conventional F 344 Rats." Cancer Res., 37, 3238-3242, 1977. Reddy, B. S., Weisburger, J. H., and Wynder, E. L. "Bile Salts and Tumor Promoters." In Slagga, T. J., Sivak, A., and Boutwell, R. K. (eds.), Carcinogenesis: Mechanisms of Tumor Promotion and Cocarcinogenesis. New York: Raven Press, 1978. Pantuck, E. J., Hsiao, K. C., Loub, W. D., Wattenberg, L. W., Kuntzman, R., and Conney, A. H. "Stimulatory Effect of Vegetables on Intestinal Drug Metabolism in the Rat." J. Pharmacol. ,Exp. Ther., 198, 278-283, 1976. Wattenberg, L. W., and Loub, W. D. "Inhibition of Polycyclic Aroma- tic Hydrocarbon-induced Neoplasia by Naturally Occurring Indoles." Cancer Res., 38, 1410-1413, 1978. Wattenberg, L. W., Loub, W. D., Lam, L. K., and Speier, J. L. "Dietary Constituents Altering the Responses to Chemical Carcinogens." Fed. Proc., 35, 1327-1331, 1976. 49. 50. 51. 52. 53. S4. 55. 56. S7. 58. 59. 60. 61. 74 Loub, W. D., Wattenberg, L. W., and Davis, P. W. "Aryl Hydrocarbon Hydroxylase Induction in Rat Tissues by Naturally Occurring Indoles of Cruciferous Plants." J. Natl. Cancer Inst., 54, 985-988, 1975. Graham, 8., and Mettlin, C. "Diet and Colon Cancer." Am. J. Epidemiol., 109, 1-20, 1979. Haenszel, W., Berg, J., Sezi, M., Kurihara, M., and Locke, P. "Large Bowel Cancer in Hawaiian Japanese." J. Natl. Cancer Inst., 51, 1765-1779, 1973. Higginsin, J. "Etiological Factors in Gastrointestinal Cancer in Man." J. Natl. Cancer Inst., 37, 527-545, 1966. Gori, G. B. "Dietary and Nutritional Implications in the Multi- factorial Etiology of Certain Prevalent Human Cancers." Can- cer, 43, 2151-2161. Bullerman, L. B. "Significance of Mycotoxins to Food Safety and Human Health." J. Food Prot., 42, 65-86, 1979. Olajos, E. T. "Biological Interactions of N-nitroso Compounds: A Review." Ecotoxicol. Environ. Safety, 1, 175-196, 1977. Matsumoto, T., Yoshida, D., Mizusaki, S., and Okamato, H. "Mutageni- cities of the Pyrolysates of Peptides and Proteins." Mutat. Res., 56, 281-288, 1978. Nagao, M., Henda, M. Seino, Y., Yahagi, T., and Sugimura, T. "Muta- genicities of Smoke Condensates and the Charred Surface of Fish and Meat." Cancer Lett., 2, 221-226, 1977. Sugimura, T., Kawachi, T., Nagao, M., Yahagi, T., Seino, Y., Okamoto, T., Shudo, K., Kosuge, T., Tsuji, K., Wakabayashi, K., Iitaka, Y., and Itai, A. "Mutagenic Princip1e(s) in Tryptophan and Phenylalanine Pyrolysis Products." Proc. Japan Acad., 53, 58-61, 1977. Vithayatheil, A. J., Commoner, B., Nair, S., and Madyastha, P. "Isolation of Mutagens from Bacterial Nutrients Containing Beef Extracts." J. Toxicol. Environ. Health, 4, 189-202, 1978. Nagao, M., Yahagi, T., Kawachi, T., Seino, Y., Honda, M., Matsukura, N., Suigmm'a, T., Wakabayashi, K., Tsuji, K., and Kosuge, T. "Mutagens in Foods, and Especially Pyrolysis Products of Pro- tein." In Scott, D., Bridges, B. A., and Sobeis, F. H. (eds.), Progress in Genetic Toxicology. Elsevier: North Holland Biomedical Press, 1977. Commoner, B., Vithayatheil, A. J., Dolara, P., Nair, S., Madyastha, P., and Cuca, G. C. "Formation of Mutagens in Beef and Beef Extract During Cooking." Science, 201, 913-916, 1978. 62. 63. 64. 65. 66. 67. 68. 69. 70. 71. 72. 73. 74. 75. 7S Pariza, M. W., Ashoor, S. H., Chu, F. S., and Lund, D. B. "Effects of Temperature and Time on Mutagen Formation in Pan-fried Hamburger." Cancer Lett., 7, 63-69, 1979. Barnett, D. "Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons and Foods." Fd. Res. Q0, 36, 8‘12, 19760 Lijinsky, W., and Shubik, P. "Benzo(a)pyrene and Other Polynuclear Hydrocarbons in Charcoal Broiled Meats." Science, 145, 53-55, 1964. Lijinsky, W., and Shubik, P. "The Detection of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Liquid Smoke and Some Foods." Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol., 7, 337-343, 1965. Lijinsky, W., and Ross, A. E. "Production of Carcinogenic Polynu- clear Hydrocarbons in the Cooking of Food." Food Cosmet. Toxicol., 5, 343-347, 1967. Doremire, M. E., Harmon, G. E., and Pratt, D. E. "3,4-Benzopyrene in Charcoal Grilled Meats." J. Food Sci., 44, 622-623, 1979. Rappaport, S. M., McCartney, M. C., and Wei, E. T. "Volatilization of Mutagens from Beef During Cooking." Cancer Lett., 8, 139- 145, 1979. Tilgner, D. J., and Duan, H. "Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (Polynuclears) in Smoked Foods." Residue. Rev., 27, 19-41, 1969. D011, R. 'The Geographical Distribution of Cancer." Br. J. Cancer, 23, 1-8, 1969. Haenszel, W., and Correa, P. "Cancer of the Colon and Rectum and Adenomatous Polyps: A Review of Epidemiologic Findings." Cancer, 28, 14-24, 1971. Wynder, E. L., and Shigematsu, T. "Environmental Factors of Cancer of the Colon and Rectum." Cancer, 20, 1520-1561, 1975. Wynder, E. L., Kajitan, T., Ishikawa, S., Dodo, H., and Takano, A. "Environmental Factors of Cancer of the Colon and Rectum. 11 Japanese Epidemiological Data." Cancer, 23, 1210-1220, 1969. Wynder, E. L., and Hirayama, T. "Comparative Epidemiology of Cancer in the United States and Japan." Prev. Med., 6, 567-594, 1977. Freeman, H. J. "Experimental Animal Studies in Colonic Carcinogene- sis and Dietary Fiber." In Spiller, G. A., and Kay, R. (eds.), Medical Aspects of Dietary Fiber. New York: Plenum Publ., 1980. 76. 77. 78. 79. 80. 81. 82. 83. 84. 85. 86. 87. 88. 89. 76 Freeman, H. J., Kim, Y., and Kim. Y. S. "Glycoprotein Metabolism in Normal Proximal and Distal Rat Colon and Changes Associated with l,2-dimethy1hydrazine-induced Colonic Neoplasia." Cancer Res., 38, 3385-3390, 1978. Pozharisski, K. M. "Morphology and Morphogenesis of Experimental Epithelial Tumors of the Intestine." J. Natl. Cancer Inst., 54, 1115-1135, 1975. Ward, J. M. "Morphogenesis of Chemically Induced Neoplasms of the Colon and Small Intestine in Rats." Lab. Invest., 30, 505-513, 1974. Weisburger, J. H. "Large Bowel Cancer: Metabolic Epidemiology and Carcinogenesis." Cancer, 36, 2385-2386, 1975. Weisburger, J. H. "Colon Carcinogens: Their Metabolism and Mode of Action." Cancer, 28, 60-70, 1971. LaMont, J. T., and O'Gorman, T. A. "Experimental Colon Cancer." Gastroenterol, 75, 1157-1169, 1978. Kanagalingam, K., and Balis, E. M. "In Vivo Repair of Rat Intestinal DNA Damage by Alkylating Agents." Cancer, 36, 2364-2372, 1975. Teppo, L., and Saxen, E. "Epidemiology of Colon Cancer in Scandina- via." Isreal J. Med. Sci., 15, 322-328, 1979. Reddy, B. S., Weisburger, J. H., and Wynder, E. L. "Effect of High Risk and Low Risk Diets for Colon Carcinogenesis on Fecal Microflora and Steroids in Man." J. Nutr., 105, 878-884, 1975. Broitman, S. A., Vitale, J. J., Vasrousek-Jakaba, E., and Gotllieb, L. S. "Polyunsaturated Fat, Cholesterol and Large Bowel Tumori- genesis." Cancer, 40, 2455-2463, 1977. Nigro, N. D., Singh, D. V., Campbell, R. L., and Pak, M. S. "Effect of Dietary Beef Fat on Intestinal TUmor Formation by Azoxy- methane." J. Natl. Cancer Inst., 54, 439-442, 1975. Reddy, B. S., and Wynder, E. L. "Large Bowel Carcinogenesis: Fecal Constituents of Populations with Diverse Incidence Rates of Colon Cancer." J. Natl. Cancer Inst., 50, 1437-1442, 1973. Narisawa, T., Magadia, N. E., Weisburger, J. H., and Wynder, E. L. "Promoting Effect of Bile Acids on Colon Carcinogenesis after Intrarectal Instillation of MNNG in Rats." J. Natl. Cancer Inst., 53, 1093-1097, 1974. Reddy, B. S. Hedges, A., Laakso, K., and Wynder, E. L. "Fecal Constituents of a High-risk North American and a Low-risk Finnish Population fOr the Development of Large Bowel Cancer." Cancer Lett., 4, 217-22, 1978. 90. 91. 92. 93. 94. 95. 96. 97. 98. 99. 100. 101. 102. 77 Reddy, B. S., Mangat, S., Weisburger, J. H., and Wynder, E. L. "Effect of High Risk Diets for Colon Carcinogenesis on Intes- tinal Mucosal and Bacterial B-glucoronidase Activity in F344 Rats." Cancer Res., 37, 3533-3536, 1977. Reddy, B. S. Narisawa, T., Weisburger, J. H., and Wynder, E. L. "Promoting Effect of Sodium Deoxycholate on Colon Adenocar- cinomas in Germ-free Rats." J. Natl. Cancer Inst., 56, 441- 442, 1976. Hill, M. J., Crowther, J. S., Drasar, B. S., Hawksworth, C., Aries, V., and Williams, R. E. "Bacteria and Etiology of Cancer of the Large Bowel." Lancet., 1, 95-100, 1971. Reddy, B. S., Mastromarino, A., and Wynder, E. L. "Further Leads on Metabolic Epidemiology of Large Bowel Cancer." Cancer Res., 35, 3403-3406, 1975. Drasar, B. S., and Jenkins, D. J. A. "Bacteria, Diet, and Large Bowel Cancer." Am. J. Clin. Nutr., 29, 1410-1416, 1976. Finegold, S. M., Attebery, H. R., and Sutter, V. L. "Effect of Diet on Human Fecal Flora: Comparison of Japanese and American Diets." Am. J. Clin. Nutr., 27, 1456-1469, 1974. Fuchs, H. Dorfman, S., and Floch, M. H. "The Effect of Dietary Fiber Supplementation in Man. II Alterations in Fecal Phy- siology and Bacterial Flora." Am. J. Clin. Nutr., 29, 1143- 1447, 1976. Speck, R. S., Calloway, D. H., and Hadley, W. K. "Human Fecal Flora Under Controlled Dietary Intake." Am. J. Clin. Nutr., 28, 1488-1494, 1970. Zubrzycki, 1., and Spaulding, E. H. "Studies on the Stability of the Normal Fecal Flora." J. Bacteriol, 83, 968-974, 1962. Mastromarino, A. J., Reddy, B. S., and Wynder, E. L. "Fecal Pro- files of Anaerobic Microflora of Large Bowel Cancer Patients and Patients with Nonhereditary Large Bowel Polyps." Cancer Res., 38, 4458-4462, 1978. Moore, W. E. C., and Holdeman, L. V. "Discussin of Current Bacter- iological Investigations of the Relationship Between Intestinal Flora, Diet and Colon Cancer." Cancer Res., 35, 3326-3331, 1975. Goldin, B. R., and Gorbach, S. L. "The Relationship Between Diet and Rat Fecal Bacterial Enzymes Implicated in Colon Cancer." J. Natl. Cancer Inst., 57, 371-375, 1976. Reddy, B. S. Weisburger, J. H., and Nynder, E. L. "Fecal Bacterial B-glucuronidase; Control by Diet." Science, 183, 416-417, 1974. 103. 104. 105. 106. 107. 108. 109. 110. 111. 112. 113. 114. 115. 78 Salyers, A. A., Sperry, J. F., Wilkins, T. D., Walker, A. R. P., and Richardson, N. J. "Neutral Steroid Concentrations in the Faeces of North American Black Populations at Different Risks fbr Cancer of the Colon." S. Afr. Med. J., 51, 823-827, 1977. Lipkin, M. "Susceptibility of Human Papulation Groups to Colon Cancer." Adv. Cancer Res., 27, 281-304, 1978. Graham, 5., Dayal, H. Swanson, M. Mittelman, A., and Wilkinson, G. "Diet in the Epidemiology of Cancer of the Colon and Rectum." J. Natl. Cancer Inst., 61, 709-714, 1978. Moore, W. E. C., Cato, E. P., and Holdeman, L. V. "Some Current Concepts in Intestinal Bacteriology." Am. J. Clin. Nutr., 31, 533-542, 1978. Goldin, B. R., Dwyer, J., Gorbach, S. L., Gordon, W., and Swenson, L. "Influence of Diet and Age on Fecal Bacterial Enzymes." Am. J. Clin. Nutr., 31, $136-$140, 1978. Burkitt, D. P. "Epidemiology of Cancer of the Colon and Rectum." Cancer, 23, 3-13, 1971. Freeman, H. J. "Dietary Fibre and Colonic NeOplasia." CMA Journal, 4, 291-296, 1979. Jensen, 0. M., and MacLennan, R. "Dietary Factors and Colorectal Cancer in Scandinavia." Israel J. Med. Sci., 15, 329-334, 1979. Malhotra, S. L. "Geographical Distribution of Gastrointestional Cancers in India with Special Reference to Causation." Gut., 8, 361-377, 1967. Watanabe, K., Reddy, B. S., and Kritchevsky, D. "Effect of Various Dietary Fibers and Food Additives on Azoxymethane or Methylni- troso-urea-induced Colon Carcinogenesis in Rats." Fed. Proc., 37, 262, 1978. Watanabe, K., Reddy, B. S., Wong, C. Q., and Weisburger, J. H. "Effect of Undegraded Carrogeenan on Colon Carcinogenesis in F-344 Rats Treated with Azoxymethane or Methylnitrosourea." Cancer Res., 38, 4427-4430, 1978. Wilson, R. B., Hutcheson, D. P., and Widerman, L. "Dimethylhydrazine Induced Colon Tumors in Rats Fed Beef Fat or Corn Oil With and Without Wheat Bran." Am. J. Clin. Nutr., 30, 1976-181, 1977. Autrup, H., Schwartz, R. D., Essingmann, J. M., Smith, L., Trump, B. F., and Harris, C. C. "Metabolism of Af1atoxin B1 Benzo- (a)pyrene and 1,2-dimethy1hydrazine by Cultured Rat and Human Colon." In Press. 116. 117. 118. 119. 120. 121. 122. 123. 124. 125. 126. 127. 128. 79 Fang, W., and Strobel, H. W. "Activation of Carcinogens and Mutagens by Rat Colon Mucosa." Cancer Res., 38, 2939-2944, 1978. Fang, W., and Strobel, H. W. "The Drug and Carcinogen Metabolism System of Rat Colon Microsomes." Arch. Biochem. Biophys., 186, 128-138, 1978. Wattenberg, L. W. "Studies of Polycyclic Hydrocarbon Hydroxylases of the Intestine Possibly Related to Cancer: Effect of Diet on Benzpyrene Hydroxylase Activity." Cancer, 20, 99-102, 1971. Association of Offical Agricultural Chemists. "Microchemical Methods." In Hotwitz, W. (ed.), Official Methods of Analysis of the Association of Official Agricultural Chemists, 10th ed., Washington, D.C., 1965. Nebert, D. W., and Gelboin, H. V. "Substrate-inducible Microsomal Aryl Hydrocarbon Hydroxylase in Cell Culture." J. Biol. Chem., 243, 6242-6249, 1968. VanCantfort, J., DeGraeve, J., and Gielen, E. "Radioactive Assay for Aryl Hydrocarbon Hydroxylase: Improved Biological Method and Biological Importance." Biochem. Biophys. Res. Comm., 79, 505-512, 1977. Lowry, O. H., Rosebrough, N. J., Farr, A. L., and Randall, R. J. "Protein Measurement with the Folin Phenol Reagent." J. Biol. Chem., 193, 265-275, 1951. Ames, B. N., McCann, J., and Yamasaki, E. "Methods fOr Detecting Carcinogens and Mutagens with Salmonella/Mhmmalian-Microsome Mutagenicity Test." Mutat. Res., 31, 347-364, 1975. Skrypec, D. J., and Bennink, M. R. "Isolation and Cultivation of Intestinal Cells." In Vitro, 15, 183, 1979. Munro, H. N., and Fleck, A. "The Determination of Nucleic Acids." Meth. Biochem. Anal., 14, 113-176, 1966. Jernstrom, B., Vadi, H., and Orrenius, S. "Formation in Isolated Rat Liver Microsomes in Nuclei of Benzo(a)pyrene Metabolites Bind to DNA." Cancer Res., 36, 4407-4113, 1976. Lu, A. Y H., Levin, W., Vore, M., Conney, A. H., Thakker, D. R., Holder, 6., and Jernia, D. M. "Metabolism of Benzo(a)pyrene by Purified Liver Microsomal Cytochrome P443 and Epoxide Hydrase." in Freudenthal, R. 1., and Jones, P. (eds.),_Carcinogenesis: A Comprehensive Survey. New York: Raven Press, 1976. Clinton, 8. K., Truex, C. R., and Visek, W. J. "A Model System for Evaluating the Role of Dietary Fiber in Chemical Carcino- genesis." Biochem. Pharmacol. 27, 1393-1396, 1978. 80 129. Gielen, J. E., and Nebert, D. W. "Microsomal Hydroxylase Induction in Liver Cell Culture by Phenobarbitol, Polycyclic Hydrocarbons and p,p' DDT." Science, 1972, 167-169, 1971. 130, Hecht, S. S., Grabowski, W., and Groth, K. "Analysis of Faeces for Benzo(s)pyrene after Consumption of Charcoal-broiled Beef by Rats and Humans." Fd. Cosmet. Toxicol., 17, 223-227, 1979. 131. Decoufle, P., Stanislawczyk, K., Houten, L. Bross, I. D. J., and Viadana, E. "A Retrospective Survey of Cancer in Relation to Occupation." DHEW (NIOSH) Publ. No. 77-178, 1978. "‘1:11rim/Litmmm