“H'HLJ'LI, :I‘3,':\:W‘ ., 33.33:” H 1'31.” ,,III \,I.I.II,IL ”'3'” 31 II. "It «4% 3.1, . “3,334”: a,” ELI“ 333'“, I 3 . .I'fi "‘3‘1‘33 I, l ‘ . I1 H, ' “ . .:.,.i,1‘,1:"I'I\‘I'I""':'. .35 1 H I ”- '2' “3.3133 3,3233, c' ”'le” tiII.“u?:'g'I‘I:3,' 13’4” ”5‘1 33"” 31> 3,31... ‘ ‘ .'- I, V ”Yd-33: ,_.I. .. . 1.. ‘3' '4 Ii .3. I 914 ‘3 ‘ 1" '” 3 _',I,I 13‘ , ’1'3"",‘l"' 34“".1‘::,:!‘(,'I'l I I'II'I:.' . n1‘;3 II '3" 7\;::;.,1'" ', ,I,I,I;I 'I'I"'V 385‘ :,,.._,L' 3'32”. ,1 .I.‘ (,3? ' - I 4_ I .3353; .'-. 1. I ' . I'I'I'I'z' ”W I 3” 15:1“; ”" mfi“ , I 3,, 1"1"L“ 1, I1 I,I ”I: ,-.3'1I:'\,'I"4‘ ' I,"V'€I'I'I:::§i; URI 33,33”, "931' ' 3'” .3 LL‘ILIFI 'I’ ” ., .. HHHHMWI,,,,,II,4,.I,II.II ‘91-“ 'I 'I'I'I 'y'~,:'.H,H'I\"4' I '. ' '1'""‘"""""""' ' ‘ 33,, I..:‘.:':.;“" M ',,'.Q ,I‘( 773.. II, .Iv. ‘I I,I . “,33. "'I'"'I'I'II.1." "" I'I'I'JIII' H: "".""'L"' 'l:':"" ., I"'I"ILVI"‘ 4'“ H" "H!" IIIIV'J' .I. . . 'I 'I 'I I'I'I'I I '1"”' "I" "I II‘I"'I‘:‘; ' '1'" 3 I 'I 'I 331, ”'V'1I ”‘IN'O u ””‘A'K , l3 “1",,“ ;:"V' , “"Y '(':K' 3.1". '-. ,'I'I 3:?" 'v‘, I "::'I" ,I'i' ”3'” 34323; 0.3,. 03"” H, 3 :. ”.333: 3,! ”1"". . :34I3' 423,3,“ ”I'I' ”I' I I,I,3 '3; 'I,I'*III I" '4 . I,II"'7~I:'I 3, ,.,3,I,3, 63,33,333 '45? {‘1‘1“ ' ”Il‘ (”Lu 14”" HI "'13 I'4'If' 1"“ ”"3” ,3...” LI I 314%”; ,- I‘ L I. M 4:33” ”:3: “,3” “:3. ,‘I I“ ~ ”’W .mwmwwwf I'v'4 WI", 5.11.1, , ‘ ' ' " 33:?“ i“ 3””:1'133 ‘I.IL'},I'II:I‘ Inn“. "'"3' 3.” "1 1H,, :3 I 3.1,". I... I |(,I'."l"'i' “”7""- I'I'vl, {32”I4-I :1”. “I "5"”: I‘:I'I"""' ”I” 3"” ' t: 3,3,» 'I' ,MJ'I MI, '8 3'", "$6354 ”I """" '31,.",,I'_"'I,""""I,'I'-'. W .3», WI , ',I‘4,,II'I: .2. 'III.” I WWMfiWW'"t I ‘ ' "‘4" ”,I”,I,:'Ii' ‘,'.I I I'I 1'" 1 1' .‘I "' - I 4'4I3,:I,I‘ H'Ié' 3 $31,333,“ II-."' WI 3'" I 35"“, 1"" "'H' I ‘1': 11.1; 13" .z 5313‘ I I ,I I” 1,,I,I.: ,,,"" .1 I'III flu I -'-l ' I"'II"| ""9 "I ' ”I . I. ,I 133111 "..I ‘33 "' ”L" '15" III‘I'::;;.!1'I‘ t's:”'”"3" 3; ” I 13,“ "ht" I- 13144" I'I'Q'SW; kW” 3121 {III '5‘? l , . “1 . _, - Tn < “agate”: 9: "“' IIIIIII ”'13:" " '" 6"; "' 53y ' :c... ... :5: :r: _.;..—9, I 3. , I ”W I III; III“ 9,“: Ii”'1i"‘;"3v,""'r'”'3 .¢¥Ip. 3., '3 h I ,.r7'"3"1"' ‘ 3‘ 111:1 '1.” "I III II 333,3 W..;§==5~‘=‘Tr“*=:: ,,,, gift} III- :rzaiv‘.‘ :22:— .... 5-“ . f :_ _ ...,..., . .4. V‘V'l' ~.,'.\I .‘3‘2‘I .,, 331:5” '3'“ 3 MM I 3,. . .V. .121 3:3 I‘ 4 4:3,”.I Y? 153 U; '31,?” 4‘, ,‘,I,I 3 I I LI,I,I,3‘:‘3;3§: :1”: 1" I ‘II‘ A” €I,I,I‘I'III:3 .1? I 311:3”, 54 :5" ”MI '1“ .. ,4...) "i. 4.37 J7 ..... 3 .53. 2‘75" . rad” rig' 31"}? .f}; . .3. 1447?;- fifiy ‘L I. n I" r ,1 L"""‘I‘t'1 3"4" 53" 3219'; R ”'3”? 33:33 "I Hist“ $153125! ,1..le " "I;- I,” 3,33,: ”5.1 UH ,3, I'm gfifiw ”kid 1 It"; 'l'ti" x1t$1””” "\E§IV\1?..:§"§" ”‘3" 1 "8' ”‘1" W L”? REIw' 5'33”” ”‘53:" ””55“ '1"“"" 73"" I33, I” ' (":5 vzi‘V“ H ‘K , WES; "S ‘ News“ "4"" 55.1.3”: ,3; LI ,3,1, #:531. K” I. . 3 K" '3 ,, I . i“ {3,3,7‘1' “3,3,3 I‘ . " I,3, I _ 4111 'x' ”.3 ' 534,539,33‘ 3,313 H ,3”; I 1,.(3‘Rflu I 'u'x} H 'IfiI ' I' "I H” . )‘3. (93:32”: I ";':."1' 333‘t I "h $334.1, :N, I“ .7, 3.311913 . 3,3,: ,,‘,~IIIIII 3:4”: ”3,: ”:14”. ,W v§< Jinftilr' gwwfii’ .3112. 13 ”3,351. «m .. I ‘:1'3H'$‘," .33., ’* . II ,' ‘ '3” ”I"! I'”'!' hr" 0.1133‘3;‘"I‘3'I'I '1'} 3” ”3,,” "' ' wwhflmkm I 33"“ I II‘," -' 33" ' .-. .'!L"'1' I LY'I' 3'03. .5 3:4} 3,”.3, ....I~..I~v~~-w 1’ 9‘ ¥' “( " ‘I‘I,II"1,II3;I§§I lV‘fi ”. ":ka Ankh]: Iv , """"'I" ,I, I” 4 ( ”5"”; 31"?”1'3'34'1 ‘I‘WIIVV I2 ”3” l"1'l'l:!'l" ‘ I ”:zfl‘l '”'I I X' 91.31;: Igu'q'a'” '33 , I 3,) ”W's”; _I'I," III‘I' LI'VHI'5". """'"I‘I:‘I‘ . 31:1." ' ”3," " I" ”"3”: I, I”, 41‘” I . 51;? W5 "3": .3. .434... 33”.. “4‘3 “:33 C3,'I"I5¥". 3.31:3. .- H, , ,... ..., I; H!,H'I'§':,:§:w,313'3 I'!: 3', 3:33 133,1: 1 I I'J:':""'I""” 3.2313331“, '3'?” "" "'1 ”3"" 333‘} I‘IzI'I, ‘1‘ ’ ‘I‘I ‘3 '1' ' V I I' W'I"'3' 3'4".“ .231”, 3% 3. 33 1,, ,1, III I II '3 i '3‘” I 41'3"": ".333 31' (‘lvt'i ”42" ,wwv' 'TV I ":25.” n, . "I IN ,_ 3333* W 'I l'???‘ ' 1%”v' .3 "3 If. V I I1 ' 2.; ’4‘. 3‘: 1:3?) - J 133," "1'! K"; «.- $5.“ 3.3"” «Ir a. - 542:" 44“.!“ 33, 3,3,;M‘ ””35 fig “Lg-3‘.» 3"”: ’3. 3.3.3.33 '33:?" “~'-3 > 1‘1 'VY V‘I I I. 'x ””1"",2'5313‘ '33:”: $31,”. ”3,!” 3‘ 9‘ ., § .1 ”"53. ”.31 11. 3 43,3, IV" 49"“ """' {£3 'II 'II . \\\\\\\\\\\\\11111111111111111 1.in 4 R Y Michigan _ 3” . Cnity - 1111111 3 1293 10419 1386 ELECTROPHORETIC CHARACTERIZATION OF THE PROTEOSE- PEPTONE FRACTION OF BOVINE MILK BY Gary Allan Kasper A THESIS Submitted to Michigan State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE Department of Food Science and Human Nutrition 1978 ABSTRACT ELECTROPHORETIC CHARACTERIZATION OF THE PROTEOSE- PEPTONE FRACTION OF BOVINE MILK BY Gary Allan Kasper Classical acid-soluble and heat-stable proteose-peptone specimens were prepared from skimmilk, casein—free, centrifuged serum, and micellar casein. As many as 38 protein-stained zones were evidenced in PAGE—discontinuous. Sixty—two zones could be accounted for by excising zones from 7.5% PAG and reelectrophoresing them in 17.5% PAG. Twenty-two zones, ranging in molecular weight from <3000 to ~90,000, were revealed by SDS-PAGE, with a large number of Species £31,000 daltons. As many as 23 zones, ranging in pI from 3.8 to 5.3, were demonstrated in IEF-PAG. Zones stained for phosphorus and carbohydrate verified that phosphOproteins, glycoproteins, and phosphoglycoproteins exist in this fraction. Previous observations that component 3 is of serum origin and that components 5 and 8 are casein-associated and distributed between the casein micelle and the serum were substantiated. All three principal components were confirmed to be electrophoretically heterogeneous. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The author wishes to express his sincere gratitude to his major professor, Dr. J. R. Brunner, for his advice, patience, and guidance during the course of this study and for his aid in the preparation of the thesis manuscript. Appreciation is also extended to Dr. L. R. Dugan and Dr. R. C. Chandan of the Department of Food Science and Human Nutrition and to Dr. H. A. Lillevik of the Department of Biochemistry for reviewing the thesis manuscript and for serving on the examination committee. The author also acknowledges the fine interaction and aid of the many fellow graduate students during the course of this study. The author also wishes to express appreciation to the Department of Food Science and Human Nutrition and to the Ralston-Purina Company for the financial assistance granted to him for the duration of this study. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES . LIST OF FIGURES. INTRODUCTION. REVIEW OF LITERATURE . . . . . EXPERIMENTAL. Chemical Analysis Nitrogen. Physical Methods. Preparation of Proteose- -Peptone Specimens. . Polyacrylamide Gel Electrophoresis in Glass Tubes . Polyacrylamide Gel Electrophoresis in a Discontinuous Buffer System . . . . Polyacrylamide Gel Electrophoresis in Gradient Pore Gels. Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate Polyacrylamide Gel ElectrOphoresis IsoeIectric Focusing in Polyacrylamide Gel Excision of Classical Regions from 7. 5°o Polyacrylamide Gels. Densitometric Scanning of Stained Polyacrylamide Gels. Phosphoprotein Staining of Polyacrylamide Gels . Glycoprotein Staining of Polyacrylamide Gels. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Electrophoretic Methods Polyacrylamide Gel Electr0phoresis in Single Pore-Size Gels. Excision of Classical Regions from 7.5% Polyacrylamide Gels and Their Reelectrophoresis in 17.5% Polyacrylamide Gels .. . Differential Staining of 17. S°o Polyacrylamide Gels for Phosphorus and for Carbohydrate . . . . iii Page vi 15 15 15 15 15 17 19 19 20 20 21 21 22 22 23 23 23 30 34 Page Polyacrylamide Gel Electrophoresis in 10—25% and 15-30% Gradient Pore Gels . . . . . 38 Polyacrylamide Gel Electrophoresis Containing Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate . . . . 40 Excision of Classical Regions from 7. S°o Polyacrylamide Gels and Their Reelectrophoresis in 17. 5% Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate Polyacrylamide Gels. . . . . . . . . . 54 IsoeIectric Focusin in Polyacrylamide Gel . . . . . . . 59 Origin of the Proteose- -Peptone Fraction . . . . . . 62 Suggested Experiments to Further Examine the Proteose- Peptone Fraction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 71 SUMMARY. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 73 BIBLIOGRAPHY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 74 APPENDIX . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 80 ADDENDUM . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 89 iv Table A-5. LIST OF TABLES Physical and chemical parameters of components 3, 5, 8-slow, and 8-fast of the proteose-peptone fraction . Molecular weights of proteose-peptone specimens determined from 5.0%, 7. %, 10.0%, 12.5% and 17.5% SDS-PAGE . Molecular weights of regions 3, 3+5, 5, 5+8, and 8 excised from 7.5% PAG determined from 17.5% SDS-PAG. Comparison of amino acid compositions of peptide 1-107 of B-casein A2 and component 5 . . . . . . . Comparison of amino acid composition of peptide 1-28 of B-casein A2 and component 8-fast (unheated). Comparison of amino acid compositions of peptide 1-28 of B-casein A2.and component 8-fast (heated) Comparison of amino acid composition of peptide 29-107 of B—casein A2 and component 8-slow (unheated). Buffer solutions used in this study . Formulation of the polyacrylamide gels used in this study. Staining solutions used in this study Staining procedures used in this study . Chemicals used in this study and their sources Addendum. Amino acid analyses (mol/mol protein). Page 13 41 57 64 66 67 69 80 82 85 86 87 91 Figure 1. LIST OF FIGURES Procedure for the preparation of proteose-peptone from skimmilk . . . . Procedure for the preparation of proteose-peptone from micellar casein and serum Electrophoretic patterns of proteose-peptone specimens obtained from serum (A), micellar casein (B), and skimmilk (C) electrophoresed in 12.5% (1) and 7.5% (2) PAG Diagram of electrophoretic patterns of proteose-peptone specimens obtained from micellar casein (A), serum (B), and skimmilk (C) electrophoresed in 7.5% PAG . Electrophoretic patterns of proteose-peptone specimens obtained from serum (A), micellar casein (B), and skimmilk (C) electrophoresed in 10% (l) and 5.0% (2) PAG . Electrophoretic patterns of proteose—peptone specimens obtained from micellar casein (A), serum (B), and skimmilk (C) electrophoresed in 15.0% (1) and 17.5% (2) PAG . Densitometric scanning patterns of proteose—peptone specimens obtained from micellar casein (A), serum (B), and skimmilk (C) electrophoresed in 17.5% PAG. The corresponding electrophoregrams are beneath the pattern . . Electrophoretic patterns of proteose-peptone specimens obtained from skimmilk (A), region 3 (B), interstitial region 3+5 (C), region 5 (D) interstitial region 5+8 (E), and region 8 (F) excised from 7.5% PAG and re- electr0phoresed in 17.5% PAG . . . . . Diagram of electrophoretic patterns of proteose—peptone specimen obtained from skimmilk (A), region 3 (B), interstitial region 3+5 (C), region 5 (D), interstitial region 5+8 (E), and region 8 (F) excised from 7.5% PAG and reelectr0phoresed in 17.5% PAG . . . . . vi Page 16 18 24 25 27 28 29 31 32 Figure Page 10. Electrophoretic patterns of proteose-peptone specimens obtained from micellar casein (A), serum (B), and skimmilk (C) electrophoresed in 17. 59a PAG stained for protein (1) and for carbohydrate (2) . . . . . . . . . . 35 11. Electrophoretic patterns of proteose-peptone specimens obtained from micellar casein (A), serum (B), and skimmilk (C) electrophoresed in 17.5% PAG stained for protein (1) and for phosphorus (2). . . . . . . . . . . . 36 12. Diagram of electrophoretic patterns of protease-peptone specimens obtained from micellar casein (A), serum (B), and skimmilk (C) electrophoresed in 17.5% PAG demonstra- ting those zones which are proteins, phosphoproteins (p), glycoproteins (g), and phosphoglycoproteins (pg) . 37 13. Diagram of electrophoretic patterns of proteose-peptone specimens obtained from micellar casein (A), serum (B), and skimmilk (C) electrophoresed in 10-25% linear gradient PAG (1) and 15-30% linear gradient PAG (2) . . 39 14. Standard curve for molecular weight determination in 5.0%, 7.5%, 10.0%,12.5°o, and 17.5% SDS-PAG. . . . . . . 42 15. Electrophoretic patterns of BDH standard proteins, 53,000- 265,000 (B), l4,300-71,500 (C), RNA polymerase (E. coli) (A), bovine serum albumin (A), and proteose-peptone specimens obtained from micellar casein (F), serum (E), and skimmilk (D) electrophoresed in 5.0% SDS-PAG . . . 43 16. Electrophoretic patterns of BDH standard proteins, 53,000- 265,000 (E), l4,300-71,500 (D), bovine serum albumin (F), ribonuclease (G), ovalbumin (H), B-lactoglobulin B (H), and proteose-peptone specimens obtained from micellar casein (A), serum (B), and skimmilk (C) electrophoresed in 7.5% SDS—PAG . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . 44 17. Diagram of electrOphoretic patterns of proteose-peptone specimens obtained from micellar casein (A), serum (B), and skimmilk (C) electrophoresed in 7.5% SDS-PAG . . . 45 18. Electrophoretic patterns of BDH standard proteins, 14,300— 71,500 (D), L-glutamic dehydrogenase (E), ovalbumin (E), B-lactoglobulin B (E), ribonuclease (E), insulin (E), and proteose- peptone specimens obtained from micellar casein (A), serum (B), and skimmilk (C) electrophoresed in 10. 0% SDS PAG. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46 vii Figure 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. 27. Diagram of electrophoretic patterns of proteose-peptone specimens obtained from micellar casein (A), serum (B), and skimmilk (C) electrophoresed in 10.0% SDS-PAG . Electrophoretic patterns of BDH standard proteins, 14,300- 71,500 (D), L-glutamic dehydrogenase (E), ovalbumin (E), B-lactoglobulin B (E), ribonuclease (E), insulin (E), and proteose-peptone specimens obtained from micellar casein (A), serum (B), and skimmilk (C) electrophoresed in 12.5% SDS-PAG . . . . . . . . . . . . . Diagram of electrophoretic patterns of proteose-peptone specimens obtained from micellar casein (A), serum (B), and skimmilk (C) electrophoresed in 12.5% SDS-PAG . Electrophoretic patterns of proteose-peptone specimens obtained from micellar casein (A), serum (B), and skimmilk (C) electrophoresed in 17.5% SDS-PAG Diagram of electrophoretic patterns of proteose—peptone specimens obtained from micellar casein (A), serum (B), and skimmilk (C) electrophoresed in 17.5% SDS-PAG . Electrophoretic patterns of region 3 (A), interstitial region 3+5 (B), region 5 (C), interstitial region 5+8 (D), and region 8 (E) excised from 7.5% PAG and reelectro- phoresed in 17.5% SDS-PAG . Diagram of electrophoretic patterns of region 3 (A), interstitial region 3+5 (B), region 5 (C), interstitial region 5+8 (0), and region 8 (E) excised from 7.5% PAG and reelectrophoresed in 17.5% SDS-PAG. . . Standard curve of pH 3-6 linear gradient in IEF-PAG . Diagram of electrophoretic patterns of proteose-peptone specimens obtained from micellar casein (A), serum (B), and skimmilk (C) electrophoresed in pH 3-6 linear gradient IEF-PAG . . . . viii Page 47 48 49 50 51 55 S6 60 61 INTRODUCTION The proteose-peptone fraction of cow's milk is an uncharacterized group of acid—soluble (pH 4.6) and heat-stable (95 C for 30 min) proteins found in the plasma. This fraction is believed to consist primarily of minor caseins that are distributed between the casein micelle and the serum. Certain components are believed to be of serum origin. Electrophoresis has been the primary means of characterization of this fraction, with only four components--3, 5, 8-slow, and 8-fast-- being identified with suspected heterogeneity in each. The presence of phosphorus and carbohydrate has been detected. Zonal electrophoresis in polyacrylamide gel simultaneously exploits differences in molecular size and molecular net charge for purposes of fractionation. The mobility of a macromolecule in poly- acrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE) is directly proportional to its intrinsic charge, the pH of the buffer system employed, the magnitude of the electric field applied, and inversely prOportional to the frictional resistance encountered by the macromolecule due to its size and the density of the gel. The possibility exists that a larger protein, more highly charged, and a relatively smaller protein, less highly charged, may migrate at the same rate, and appear as a single zone. Thus the appearance of a single zone in PAGE should not be interpreted as unequivocal evidence of homogeneity. Different gel concentrations should be used to determine whether a single zone is actually homogeneous (Hedrick and Smith, 1968). Increasing the percentage.of monomer in PAGE, while keeping the ratio of monomer to crosslinker constant, re- duces the pore size of the gel matrix and enables one to separate zones that may be moving together even though they differ in size and charge. Discontinuous buffer systems in PAGE have been demonstrated to afford maximal resolution due to the ultra-thin starting zones achieved (Ornstein, 1964). Zonal electrophoresis in polyacrylamide gels containing sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS—PAGE), in which the proteins have been heated to aid in SDS binding, has been demonstrated to separate proteins solely on the basis of size (Shapiro, Vinuela, and Maizel, 1967; Weber and Osborn, 1969). This is accomplished by the proteins unfolding, binding the same amount of the highly negatively charged SDS (1.4 g SDS/g protein), assuming a rod-like form which is directly proportional to their molecular weight (Reynolds and Tanford, 1970), and moving through the gel matrix as simulated cylinders (Svasti and Panijpan, 1977). Electrophoresis in polyacrylamide gels containing carrier ampholytes, in which a linear pH gradient is produced, has been demonstrated to separate proteins solely on the basis of charge. The proteins migrate to, and reside, at their isoelectric points (Finlayson and Chrambach, 1971). This procedure is referred to as isoelectric focusing in polyacrylamide gel (IEF-PAG). Cognizant of the ability of each of the above electrOphoretic methods to separate proteins on entirely different characteristics, the author utilized PAGE in a discontinuous buffer system, SDS-PAGE, and IEF-PAG to better assess the number of components comprising the proteose-peptone fraction. By isolating the proteose-peptone com— ponents from skimmilk, casein—free centrifuged serum, and micellar casein the distribution of these components in the milk protein system was investigated. The presence of phosphorus and carbohydrate in this fraction was examined by differential staining of the electrophoretic zones for these substances. REVIEW OF LITERATURE Osborne and Wakeman (1918) were among the first workers to suggest the presence of an acid-soluble and heat-stable protein in milk. They observed that some proteinaceous material still remained in solution after the albumins and globulins of acid whey were heat- denatured. They were uncertain as to whether this protein was indige- nous to milk or an artifact resulting from the heat treatment. Palmer and Scott (1919), using tannic acid to precipitate protein from casein-free, heat-denatured whey, postulated that lactal- bumin and lactoglobulin were not the only proteins present in a casein- free filtrate of milk. Kieferle and Gloetzl (1930), and Kieferle (1933) employed phosphotungstic acid to precipitate soluble proteins from heat- coagulated milk, classifying these components as proteoses and peptones. Jones and Little (1933) reported the presence of considerable amounts of proteose in milk, designated as the material precipitated by 10% trichloroacetic acid (TCA), but not by 5% TCA. Moir (1931) reported that approximately 70% of the soluble proteins of casein-free filtrate of milk were removed by heat coagula- tion. Rowland (1938a) designated the protease-peptone as a protein fraction which did not precipitate at pH 4.7 after heating skimmilk at 95 C for 30 min but was precipitated by 12% TCA. He (1938b) reported the nitrogen distribution of normal milk as follows: 78.5% casein N, 9.2% albumin N, 3.3% globulin N, 4.0% proteose-peptone N, and 5.0% non- protein N. He (1937) also found that the non-protein nitrogen content was not affected by heating up to 100 C and that on continued heating at 95 and 100 C only minute amounts of proteose resulted from the hydrolysis of protein. Harland and Ashworth (1945) noted that casein obtained by saturating skimmilk with NaCl accounted for more nitrogen than con- ventionally obtained casein. The whey from this fractionation, when acidified to pH 3.0, contained 17.7% less nitrogen than that released by Rowland's precipitation method. In addition, 95% of the whey pro- teins in this preparation were coagulated by heating to 95 C for 10 min compared with 76% by Rowland's method. Aschaffenburg (1946) isolated a surface-active material, which he called sigma proteose, by heating skimmilk to 90—95 C for 15 min, followed by coprecipitation of the casein and denatured serum proteins by acid or rennet coagulation. Treatment of this fraction with one- half saturated ammonium sulfate resulted in a precipitate, which was called sigma proteose. This fraction contained significantly less nitrOgen than other principal milk proteins. In free-boundary electro— phoresis in phosphate buffer at pH 8.0, three components were seen in decreasing order of mobility, accounting for 10.5%, 82.5%, and 7.0%, respectively, of the total protein in Sigma proteose, demonstrating this fraction's heterogeneity. Ogston (1946) examined this fraction by ultracentrifugation, finding that it was heterogeneous with 49% of the material consisting of a single, well—defined constituent of molecular weight 4900 and a component comprising 11% of the fraction with a molecular weight of 23,000. The remaining 40% of the fraction was unaccounted for. Weinstein, Duncan, and Trout (1951) isolated a protein fraction from heated, rennet whey by a procedure similar to that of Aschaffen- burg, calling it the ”minor-protein fraction," capable of being photo— sensitized to produce the solar—activated flavor of homogenized milk. From elementary analysis, the minor-protein fraction was different from sigma proteose. The nitrogen content of this fraction, 10%, was low compared to the 13.95% for Aschaffenburg's sigma proteose. In the Tiselius cell, at least two components were present in the minor- protein fraction, with the isoelectric zone of the major components at pH 3.7 to 4.4, based on electrophoretic mobilities at various pH values (Weinstein, Lillevik, Duncan, and Trout, 1951). Gordon, Jenness, and Geddes (1954) reported that both casein and whey depressed the loaf volume of bread when used in the dough formulation. Jenness (1959) reported that component 5 isolated from the proteose—peptone fraction of raw milk was the heat-labile loaf— volume depressant. Volpe and Zabik (1975) isolated a loaf-volume depressant, which they attributed to proteose-peptone component 5, from acid whey and from whey ultrafiltrate. Sodium dodecyl sulfate poly- acrylamide gel electrophoresis yielded a molecular weight of 14,000- 15,000 for this component. Fuchsin-sulfite dye staining of the gel component indicated that the loaf-volume depressant was a glyc0protein. Larson and Rolleri (1955), studying the effect of heat treat- ment on free-boundary electrophoretic mobilities of whey proteins, attributed peaks 1, 2, 4, 6, and 7 to euglobulin, pseudoglobulin, a» lactalbumin, B-lactoglobulin, and serum albumin, respectively, with peaks 3, 5, and 8 being proteose-peptones. Increasing heat treatments were employed, until at 95 C for 30 min, there were only peaks 3, 5, and 8 remaining, which accounted for 4.6%, 8.6%, and 5.7%, respectively, of the whey proteins. The electrophoretic mobilities of components 3, 5, and 8, calculated from the descending boundaries, were -2.9, -4.5, and -7.9 x 10"5 cm2 volt.l sec-1, respectively. Since proteose-peptone components appeared in the electrOphoretic pattern of unheated whey, Larson and Rolleri suggested that the proteose-peptone fraction was indigenous to milk. Jenness (1957) isolated a proteose-peptone fraction, precipir tated by saturation with NaCl, but not by acid, which contained the principal constituent of proteose—peptone. This fraction was partially purified by fractional precipitation at varying values of pH and (NH4)ZSO4 concentrations. Over 90% of this material had an electro- phoretic mobility of -4.5 x 10"5 cm2 volt-1 sec.1 at pH 8.6 (Veronal) and contained 1.2-l.3% phosphorus. The fraction was soluble in the presence of CaCl2 and not affected by rennin. This is interesting in that in Jenness' procedure, the proteose-peptone components were ob- tained from fractions associated with micellar casein, while pre— viously, the proteose-peptone components were shown to be present in the whey protein fraction. Aschaffenburg and Drewry (1959) noted six bands in paper electropherograms of acid filtrates derived from heat-treated skimmilk. The prominent band corresponded to peak 5 and the five minor bands corresponded to peak 3. The same six bands were found in unheated skimmilk, further indicating their presence in native milk. By salting- out with sodium sulfate at a concentration of 12 g/100 ml, the hetero- geneous fraction could be separated from the other whey proteins present in the casein-free filtrate at pH 4.6. They also observed that the proteose-peptone stained yellow with bromophenol blue on the filter paper strips, whereas other whey proteins formed normal bluish-green bands, possibly indicating the presence of carbohydrates. Thompson and Brunner (1959) were the first workers to demon- strate that the proteose-peptone fraction contained glyc0proteins. They identified hexose, hexosamine, fucose, and sialic acid in several minor. proteins of milk-~the soluble membrane protein, Weinstein's minor- protein fraction, and proteose-peptone. A high hexose and sialic acid content was a common characteristic of these fractions. They suggested that the glycoproteins of the proteose—peptone fraction might originate from blood serum. Brunner and Thompson (1961) reported chemical composition and physical parameters of five minor protein fractions, namely: Rowland's proteose-peptone, Aschaffenburg's sigma proteose, Jenness' component 5, Weinstein's minor-protein fraction, and the soluble fat globule membrane protein. The chemical composition of these five protein fractions were very similar in that they contained low amounts of sulfur-containing amino acids, contained carbohydrate, and were high in phosphorus. Some similarity was observed in their electrophoretic and ultracentrifugal properties. They concluded that a common component existed in all the fractions. Marier, Tessier, and Rose (1963) indicated that 17% to 28% more sialic acid was present in proteins precipitated with 12% TCA than in casein precipitated at pH 4.5. Proteose—peptone contained 1.8% sialic acid which accounted for the entire difference between the sialic acid content of acid casein and the milk proteins precipitated with TCA. Bezkorovainy (1965) isolated orosomucoid and M-2 glycoproteins from bovine serum and colostrum whey, and M-2 glyc0protein from whey. Milk whey contained no orosomucoid and only trace amounts of the M-2 glyc0protein. Furthermore, both milk and colostrum whey contained a phosphoglycoprotein which had practically no absorption at 280 nm, thus reflecting the low concentration of aromatic amino acid residues. Physical and chemical properties of this phosphoglycoprotein corresponded to the major component of the milk proteose-peptone fraction. Bezkoro- vainy concluded that close relationships could exist between colostrum glyc0proteins and the proteose-peptone fraction. Ganguli, Gupta, Joshi, and Bhalerao (1967) determined the sialic acid and hexose contents of the proteose-peptone fraction of milk. Proteose had higher concentrations of sialic acid and hexose than the corresponding proteose—peptone sample. Even though the casein fraction contributed the largest share of sialic acid to the sialic acid distri- bution in milk proteins, the concentration of sialic acid in the proteose-peptone fraction was four times that found in the casein fraction. The sialic acid found in the protease-peptone and proteose fractions was identified as a neuraminic acid derivative, similar to that found in k-casein. Joshi, Ganguli, and Bhalerao (1971) found that proteose-peptone of colostrum differed significantly in its concentration, its sialic 10 acid content, its molecular size, and its electrophoretic pattern from the proteose-peptone in milk. They contended that proteose-peptone in milk is likely to originate from mammary function whereas proteose— peptone in colostrum probably appears from the blood. Joshi, Ganguli, and Bhalenao (1971) observed that blood serum proteose-peptone has higher concentrations of sialic acid compared to that of milk proteose- peptone. The proteose-peptone from the blood shows more marked similarity with colostrum proteose-peptone than proteose-peptone from milk. They concluded that proteose-peptone in milk does not come from the blood. Ganguli's group (1966, 1967, 1968a,b) made an extensive study of the effect of storage, trypsin action, rennet action and heat treat- ment on the proteose-peptone content of milk. The proteose-peptone content increased upon heating milk to 25 C, presumably derived from other milk protein fractions such as casein and the whey proteins. Upon heating at 30 C and 37 C, some proteose-peptone apparently had also undergone degradation since the non-protein nitrogen increased while the proteose-peptone decreased. The proteose-peptone content of milk and casein was increased by exposure to trypsin, supposedly by release from casein and eventually changing into non-protein nitrogen by further enzymatic degradation. The newly released "proteose-peptone” contained more components, possessing lower electrophoretic mobilities and lower sialic acid contents, than the native proteose-peptone con- tent. The action of rennet on milk nearly doubled its proteose—peptone content. They suggested that a proteose-peptone—like material and non- protein fractions were released from casein, increasing with increased rennet concentrations. Proteose-peptone-like material from casein 11 and proteose-peptone from milk showed similarities in their electro— phoretic patterns, sialic acid content, and gel filtration patterns on Sephadex G—75. By gradually removing casein from milk by ultracentri- fugation, the corresponding milk serum showed a linear increase in its proteose-peptone content. Utilizing a synthetic model system comprising proteose—peptone and micellar casein, the protease-peptone level decreased upon heating whereas a similar system containing d-lactalbumin and B—lactoglobulin in place of micellar casein did not affect the proteose-peptone level. They postulated that a possible heat-induced interaction existed between micellar casein and proteose-peptone. Joshi and Ganguli (1972a) treated K-casein with 2-mercapto- ethanol, using 8% TCA to precipitate the proteose-peptones, and found an increase in the proteose-peptones. They concluded that proteose- peptones could arise as a result of a selective cleavage of K-casein at the disulfide bridges by indigenous reducing agents in the milk or the mammary glands. Joshi and Ganguli (1972b) employed gel filtration chromato- graphy to separate the proteose-peptone into fractions of different molecular weights, the leading peak evidencing the presence of sialic acid. Bezkorovainy, Nichols, and Sly (1976) isolated proteose—peptone from both human and bovine milk. The proteose-peptone from bovine milk evidenced molecular weights of 30,000, 18,000, and 12,000 in SDS—PAGE. Brunner's group has done the most detailed work on the distri- bution and composition of the proteose-peptone fraction. Kolar and Brunner (1965) found that component 8 was present in both casein micelles and in whey, and was a tenacious contaminant of K-casein 12 preparations and a leading zone in discontinuous starch-urea gel electrOpherograms. Kolar and Brunner (1968) further isolated components 5 and 8 from both heated and unheated skimmilk. Component 8 was fractionated into components 8-fast and 8-slow by gel filtration chromatography on Bio-Gel P-lO. Component 5 was characterized by its high proline and relatively low carbohydrate contents. Components 8- fast and 8-slow contained relatively higher concentrations of phosphorus. All three components were void of cysteine and cystine, and contained low concentrations of methionine. Kolar and Brunner (1969) reported that components 5 and 8 existed in equilibria between micellar casein and the serum, whereas component 3 was not present in micellar casein. Ng, Brunner, and Rhee (1970) substantiated this convention by isolating lacteal serum component 3 from both heated and unheated skimmilk. Component 3 was characterized by its high content of carbohydrates and low content of sulfur-containing amino acids. Physical and chemical parameters of the proteose-peptone fraction derived from Kolar (1967) and Ng (1967) are listed in Table l. Kang (1971) observed that the proteose-peptone fraction accounted for 18—25% of the whey proteins. Component 3 migrated as a single zone in both continuous and discontinuous polyacrylamide gels. Component 5, homogeneous in continuous gels, was resolved into five closely migrating zones when examined with a discontinuous buffer system. Component 8, migrating as two very close zones near the ion front in discontinuous gels, was resolved into multizonal areas-~8-slow and 8-fast--in continuous gels. Double diffusion immunoelectrophoresis l3 .xHHEEfixm powwo; anm venomoym n .Aeomev m2 mam fleomev emeox seem momma OOH? w.o m.m m.mu v.0 m.o v.H v.m m.mH comm v.H m.NH oom.eH N.H w.v: m.o N.o m.o o.H w.mH w.e ooo.oom 0.4 n.m m.m: o.m o.© N.n m.o H.mH :m oflhuooaoomH mMIOH X HIUOW HIHHO> NEUV pfiawnoe owuo905909uoofim meg meow oeemfim flwv oceammoxo: me omoxo: hwy monogamogm flew cowoeoez umwwuw pcocomEou zofimuw economEou m HammoQEou a m ucocomaou psoSpflpmsou -omoououm ogu mo umwm-w vcm .3ofimnw .m .m mpcocomeoo mo m.:oflwomhm oaOpmom mgopoemhwm Hmoflaogo paw Hmofimxcm .H oanmk 14 demonstrated homology between some of the proteose-peptone components and those of bovine serum. EXPERIMENTAL Chemical Analysis Nitrogen Nitrogen analyses were performed according to the semiemicro Kjeldahl method in which the ammonia is steam-distilled into 4% boric acid (Swaisgood, 1963). Selenium dioxide and cupric sulfate were the catalysts employed. Tryptophan was used as a standard, with an average recovery of 94.1%. Physical Methods Preparation of Proteose-Peptone Specimens Five gallons of raw, uncooled milk was obtained from Holstein cows of the Michigan State University dairy herd. The milk was brought up to 37 C and separated immediately. Approximately four liters of the skimmilk was heated in a 95 C water bath for 40 min. After this time the milk was promptly cooled to 20 C. One normal HCl was added until pH 4.6 was reached. The milk was left to coagulate overnight at 4 C. The coagulum and serum was filtered through.Whatman #1 filter paper. The filtrate was collected, dialyzed, pervaporated, lyophilized, and then stored at O C. Figure 1 depicts the isolation procedure used to prepare proteose-peptone from skimmilk. 15 l6 mommzz ommaeA mhamm mN>4g mNHSHzao>g memma memma mN>Sq38,000) were 41 Table 2.-—Molecular weights of proteose—peptone Specimens determined from 5.0%, 7.5%, 10.0%, 12.5% and 17.5% SDS-PAGE. Skimmilk Micellar Casein Serum 90,000 120009“b 80,000 12000991”c 74,000 1200093”C 74,000 izoooa’b’C 68,000 :1000b’c 69,000 :1000b’C 71,000 izooob’C 66,000 :1000b’C 66,000 110001”c 61,000 ilooob’c’d 61,000 110009“d 61,000 ilooob’c’d 55,000 1.1000“d 56,000 :1000c’d 55,000 11000“d 51,000 _4;1000"’d 51,000 :1000b’c’d 44,000 11000“d 44,000 :1000b’c’d 37,000 :1000C’d’e 37,000 11000998 38,000 _4_~__1000‘:’d’e 31,000 :1000‘1’e 28,000 :1000‘1’e 25,000 :_1oood’e 24,000 :1000‘1’e 25,000 :1000‘1’e 22,000 :1000‘1’e 23,000 :1000‘1’e 20,000 :1000‘1’e 19,000 iloood’e 14,000 :1000‘1’e 14,000 :1000‘1’e 12,000 :1000‘1’e 11,000 :1000‘1’e 8,200 13008 8,200 1300e 7,200 i300e 7,200 :3008 5,700e 4,600e <3,000e <3,000e <3,000e b Cdetermined from 10.0% SDS-PAGE; 6determined from 17.5% SDS-PAGE. adetermined from 5.0% SDS-PAGE; determined from 7.5% SDS-PAGE; ddetermined from 12.5% SDS-PAGE; 42 20.04 10.0- 801 6.0- 40‘ -4 MOLECULAR WEIGHT X IO 2 .04 I .04 0.3- (>2 on} 0.6 0.8 ”-"fio RE LATIVE MOBILITY SDS—PAG SDS-PAG SDS-PAG SDS-PAG SDS-PAG o\° o\° o\° o\° o\° .00 F o HHH \INONU'I . O C O . mmomo Figure 14. Standard curve for molecular weight determination in 5.0%, 7.5%, 10.0%, 12.5%, and 17.5% SDS-PAG. 43 ll' ‘1‘“ “ 1 mh’ in! 1 if,“ n“” Mil, III A B C D E F Figure 15. Electrophoretic patterns of BDH standard proteins, 53,000-265,000 (B), l4,300-71,500 (C), RNA polymerase (E. coli) (A), bovine serum albumin (A), and proteose-peptone specimens obtained from micellar casein (F), serum (E), and skimmilk (D) electrophoresed in 5.0% SDS-PAG. 44 ~_tmm’g ill-W ll— ” 111—11011 ,- . ‘7 mfi | Q and 1m C) U m ~11 C) A B H. Figure 16. Electrophoretic patterns of BDH Standard proteins, 53,000-265,000 (E), l4,300—7l,500 (D), bovine serum albumin (F), ribonuclease (G), ovalbumin (H), B—lactoglobulin B (H), and proteose- peptone specimens obtained from micellar casein (A), serum (B), and skimmilk (C) electrophoresed in 7.5% SDS-PAG. 45 .o38,000 is surprising, in that previously no completely dissociated Species with molecular weights of >40,000 have been demonstrated to be present in this fraction. Ng (1967) found component 3 to have a molecular weight of 200,000 at infinite dilution in veronal buffer in the ultracentri- fuge. This component showed concentration-dependent association phenomena. In 5M guanidine hydrochloride component 3 demonstrated a molecular weight of 40,000. Several milk proteins have been Shown to have molecular weights >40,000, but they have not been demonstrated to be stable to heating at 95 C for 40 min. Possibly the proteose-peptone fraction contains components that are rendered heat—stable by 53 glycosylation. A thorough carbohydrate staining of the electrophoretic zones in SDS-PAGE would document this. It is also plausible that associated smaller molecular weight species have not been dissociated by the SDS and heat treatment employed in preparing the protein sample for electrophoresis. However, the SDS treatment used in this Study was typical of the manner in which proteins are treated prior to SDS-PAGE. Also, the 1% Z-mercaptoethanol used Should have reduced any existing disulfide bonds. The zones of molecular weight 531,000 appeared as diffuse zones extending from the 31,000 dalton region to the region immediately behind the marker dye. Gels prepared with increasingly higher con— centrations of polyacrylamide were required to resolve closely migrating zones in this region. Zones differing in molecular weight of ~1000-2000 could be distinguished from each other in 12.5% and 17.5% SDS-PAG. The preponderance of zones at molecular weights of £31,000 should be noted because they are in the molecular weight region of the caseins. Possibly some of the minor glycosylated caseins in milk survive acid precipitation and are recovered in the proteose-peptone fraction. Also the possibility exists that zones assigned the mole- cular weights of 31,000, 28,000, 25,000, 24,000, 23,000, 20,000, and 19,000 represent associated species of cleavage products of major casein components. The molecular weight species in the 14,000, 12,000,21nd 8200 regions are quite similar to the 14,300 and 9900 dalton Species of component 5 and 8-Slow, respectively, reported by Kolar and Brunner (1970). 54 By extrapolation from the standard curve (Figure 14), the molecular weight of the zones near the bromophenol blue tracking dye were estimated at <1000. Actually, the only conclusion that can be drawn is that the molecular weights are less than that of insulin. Excision of Classical Regions from 7.5% Polyacrylamide Gels and Their ReelectrOphoresis in 17.5% Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate Polyacrylamide Gels To better assess the molecular weights of the classical 3, 5, and 8 regions, a proteose-peptone specimen from Skimmilk was electro- phoresed first in 7.5% PAG. Regions of this gel containing the classi— cal 3, 5, and 8 components, as well as the interstitial regions were excised and reelectrophoresed in 17.5% SDS-PAG (see Figures 24 and 25). Excised region 3 showed a major zone of 37,000 daltons and minor zones of 31,000, 24,000, and 15,000 daltons (see Table 3). The 37,000 dalton zone correlates well with the molecular weight of com— ponent 3 found by Ng (1970) in 5M guanidine hydrochloride in the ultra- centrifuge (~40,000). The minor zones could be smaller proteins that are associated with component 3. The excised region between regions 3 and 5 showed molecular species of 37,000, 30,000, 18,000, and 14,000 daltons, and a minor zone at 24,000 daltons. Excised region 5 contained a prominent zone of molecular weight 26,000, with minor zones of 14,000 and 12,000 daltons. The excised region between regions 5 and 8 demonstrated a lone zone of 25,000 daltons. Excised region 8 Showed two closely migrating‘zones with mobilities extending beyond that of the lowest molecular weight standard 55 Figure 24. Electrophoretic patterns of region 3 (A), interstitial region 3+5 (B), region 5 (C), interstitial region 5+8 (D), and region 8 (E) excised from 7.5% PAG and reelectrophoresed in 17.5% SDS-PAG. 56 o~ :fi pomouosmouuoofioon 6:6 .flav w+m seamen Hmfiuaumnooea .fiov m seamen mm ofluoHocmouuooHo mo Emhwmwo .mN oH=MMm < iHQHM UV'IODB'IOW OlX 57 .m:0flpmcfishopov 039 we ommho>< o\° running gel solution Dissolve .475X g acrylamide and .025X g bisacrylamide in 40 ml Tris-HCl buffer, pH 8.9, and make to 50 ml. Polymerization of Gel 50 ml gel solution 50 ul TEMED .20 ml 2.0% ammonium persulfate (freshly prepared) SDS—PAGE X% (5%—12.5%) gel formulation 10.00 m1 .20M phosphate buffer, pH 7.2 .80X m1 stock gel solution (23.750 g acrylamide and 1.250 g bisacrylamide dissolved in 100 ml). 1.00 ml 0.5% ammonium persulfate (freshly prepared) 20 ul TEMED Y ml distilled, deionized water (to bring to 20 ml) 17.5% gel formulation 12.5 ml .40M phosphate buffer, pH 7.2 29.2 ml stock gel solution (28.500 g acrylamide and 1.500 g bisacrylamide dissolved in distilled, deionized water I I and brought to 100 m1) 4 83 50 ul TEMED 1.50 ml 0.5% ammonium persulfate (freshly prepared) Y ml distilled, deionized water (to bring to 50 ml) IEF-PAG 8.00 ml gel solution (1.240 g acrylamide and .0125 g bisacrylamide dissolved in distilled, deionized water and brought to 10 ml) 1.00 ml riboflavin (w/v) .75 ml 0.8% TEMED (v/v) 125 pl ampholine pH 3.0-5.0 125 pl ampholine pH 4.0—6.0 PAGE-Gradient X% in 2% sucrose--low concentration Dissolve .95X g acrylamide, .05X g bisacrylamide, and 2.00 g sucrose in 80 ml .380 M Tris-HCl buffer, pH 8.9, and make to 100 m1. % in 15% Sucrose——high concentration Dissolve .95Y g acrylamide, .05Y g bisacrylamide, and 15.00 g sucrose in 80 ml .380M Tris-HCl buffer, pH 8.9, and make to 100 ml. 84 Gradient Formulation 75 m1 low concentration 75 ul TEMED 1.30 ml 1.0% ammonium persulfate (freshly prepared) --into left-hand chamber of gradient-maker 70 ml high concentration 70 p1 TEMED .60 ml 1.0% ammonium persulfate (freshly prepared) --into right-hand chamber of gradient-maker 85 Table A—3. Staining solutions used in this Study. Coomassie Brilliant Blue R-—.25% (w/v) Dissolve 1.25 g Coomassie Brilliant Blue R in 46 m1 glacial acetic acid and 227 ml methanol. Make to 500 ml with distilled, deionized water. Coomassie Brilliant Blue G--.04% (w/v) in 3.5% HC104 Dissolve .400 g Coomassie Brilliant Blue G in 35 g HC10 Make 4. to 1000 ml with distilled, deionized water. "Stains-all"--Stock Solution Dissolve .100 g "Stains—all" in 75 m1 formamide. Make to 100 ml volume. "Stains-all"--Working Solution Mix 10 ml of "Stains—all" stock solution with 10 ml formamide, 20 ml isopropanol, and 1.0 m1 3.0M Tris—HCl. Make to 200 ml with distilled, deionized water. 86 Table A-4. Staining procedures used in this Study. Coomassie Brilliant Blue R Immerse gels in 5% TCA for at least 30 min. Stain in Coomassie Brilliant Blue R for at least two hours. Destain in (5:7:88 : methanolzacetic acidzwater). Coomassie Brilliant Blue G Immerse gels in Coomassie Brilliant Blue G. Zones evidenced within 1-2 min. No destaining necessary. Enhance zone intensity at expense of background by immersion in 7% acetic acid. Zacharius Method of Staining Glycoproteins l. Immerse in 5% TCA for at least 30 min. 2. Rinse lightly with distilled, deionized water. 3. Immerse in H5106 (in 3% acetic acid) for 50 min. 4. Wash overnight with distilled, deionized water with several changes. 5. Immerse in fuchsin—sulfite stain for 50 min in dark at 4 C. 6. Wash with 0.5% freshly prepared K2S205 3 times for 10 min each. 7. Wash with distilled, deionized water until desired staining level is achieved. Phosphoprotein Stainingf—"Stains-all" Procedure Fix gels in 25% isopropanol for at least two hours. Stain gels in "Stains-all" overnight in dark, or until desired intensity achieved. Excessive staining causes dark background. Table A-5. Chemicals used in this study and their sources. Chemical Source Acrylamide Ames, BioRad Bisacrylamide Ames SDS (Sodium dodecyl sulfate) BioRad TEMED (Tetraethylmethylenediamide) BioRad Photoflo Eastman Stains—all Eastman Boric acid Fisher Bromophenol blue Fisher Glycine Fisher Potassium metabisulfite Fisher Schiff reagent Fisher Periodic acid BDH standard proteins Ammonium persulfate Sucrose Ampholine Acetic acid Cupric sulfate Hydrogen peroxide Riboflavin Selenium dioxide Sodium hydroxide Sulfuric acid TCA (trichloroacetic acid) G. Frederick Smith Gallard-Schlesinger J. T. Baker J. T. Baker LKB Mallinckrodt Mallinckrodt Mallinckrodt Mallinckrodt Mallinckrodt Mallinckrodt Mallinckrodt Mallinckrodt 88 2-mercaptoethanol Chymotrypsinogen Bovine serum albumin RNA polymerase——B, 8'—subunits Coomassie Brilliant Blue R Coomassie Brilliant Blue G L-glutamic dehyrogenase Insulin B-lactoglobulin Ovalbumin Phenol red Ribonuclease Tris (trishydroxymethylaminomethane) Matheson, Coleman and Bell Nutritional Biochemical Corp. Pierce Pierce Sigma Sigma Sigma Sigma Sigma Sigma Sigma Sigma Sigma ADDENDUM ADDENDUM Andrews (1978) concluded that proteose-peptone components 5 and 8-fast are, respectively, the 1-105 and 1-28 segments of B-casein A2 formed by the cleavage of B-casein to form Yz-casein and yl-casein. Andrews heated skimmilk at 95 C for 30 min, adjusted the milk to pH 4.6, collected the supernatant, and saturated with (NH4)ZSO4. The precipitate was fractionated by dialysis to give the diffusible proteose-peptone component 8-fast and by gel filtration to give com— ponent 5 of the proteose-peptone fraction. The amino acid analyses of components 5 and 8-fast demonstrated a very close correlation to the 1-105 and 1-28 segments of B-casein A2, respectively (see Addendum Table). Kanno and Yamauchi (1978) postulated that proteose-peptone component 3 is identical to a soluble glyc0protein (SGP) of the milk fat globule membrane. They employed Ouchterlony's double immuno- diffusion and Scheidegger's immunoelectrOphoretic assays to assess any antigenic Similarities between the SGP fraction and individual proteose—peptone components 3, 5, and 8. Only component 3 contained the anti—SGP reacting protein. Even though their SDS-PAGE patterns were somewhat different, the SGP and component 3 each contained a major 89 90 glycoprotein of 20,000 daltons, which seemed to cause the identical antigenicity of both protein fractions. Andrews, A. T. 1978. Proteolysis in milk and the formation of proteose-peptones. XX: Int. Dairy Cong. Kanno, C. and Yamauchi, K. 1978. Antigenic Similarity between a major soluble glyc0protein fraction of milk fat globule membrane and proteose-peptone fraction of milk. XX: Int. Dairy Cong. Table Addendum.--Amino acid analyses (mol/mol protein). 91 B-casein A2 B-casein A2 Amino acid Component 5 Component (1-105) 8-fast (1-28) ASpartic acid 6.0 6 2.1 2 Threonine 4.7 5 1.3 1 Serine 7.3 9 4.2 5 Glutamic acid 24.2 24 6.8 7 Proline 13.0 14 1.7 1 Glycine 3.0 3 1.0 l Alanine 2.7 3 0.2 0 Valine 7.7 9 2.0 2 Methionine 2.3 2 0.3 0 Isoleucine 6.1 7 2.6 3 Leucine 8.3 8 2.9 3 Tyrosine 1.8 1 0.3 0 Phenylalanine 4.2 4 0.2 0 Histidine 1.8 l 0.2 0 Lysine 6.9 7 0.9 l Arginine 1.9 2 1.9 2 aFrom Andrews (1978). «1%; "IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII“