MSU

LIBRARIES
-—__

 

 

 

RETURNING MATERIALS:

ace 1n boo rop to
remove this checkout from
your record. FINES will
be charged if book is
returned after the date
stamped below.

 

ME”

 

 

 

USE OF THE CONSERVATION NEEDS INVENTORY AND SOIL
MANAGEMENT GROUPS AND UNITS TO EVALUATE
SOME SOIL-LAND USE RELATIONSHIPS
IN MICHIGAN'S LAND
RESOURCE AREAS
By
Peter Jay Lumbert

A THESIS

Submitted to
Michigan State University
in partial fulfillment of the requirements
for the degree of

MASTER OF SCIENCE

Department of Crap and Soil Sciences

1981

[I

ABSTRACT
USE OF THE CONSERVATION NEEDS INVENTORY AND SOIL
MANAGEMENT GROUPS AND UNITS TO EVALUATE
SOME SOIL-LAND USE RELATIONSHIPS
IN MICHIGAN'S LAND
RESOURCE AREAS

By
Peter Jay Lumbert

The Conservation Needs Inventory (CNI) in 1967 inven-
toried soil and land use on non-federal and non-urban lands
by Land Resource Area's (LRA's). Michigan's Soil Management
Groups were added to the CNI data and soil-land use relation-
ships were evaluated for each of the LRA's.

Four soil formation factors were found to affect the
distribution of land use; climate, slope. natural drainage
and parent material. Climatically the state is divided
into north and south. Land use in the north was dominated
by forestry and in the south by cropland. Generally, as
slope increased. natural drainage became poorer and parent
material became coarser textured, the percentage of cropland
uses decreased and the percentage of forestry increased.

It was also determined that in 1967 significant acreage
of potentially good and potentially prime farmland was in
non-agricultural uses and could be shifted into agricultural

production if the need arose.

I wish to dedicate this work to my wife Nancy. She is

as responsible for it as am I.

ii

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

No work of this nature is a single-handed effort and
thanks are in order for all those who contributed. Thanks
are extended to Dr. E. P Whiteside for his long hours of
organizing. guiding and reviewing each step as it progressed.
Mrs. Whiteside should be thanked also for her patience and
understanding during the 5 years of this project. Dr. Lynn
Robertson, Dr. Henery Foth and Dr. Harold Winters are to
be thanked for their contributions to the guidance committee,
especially Dr. Robertson for stepping in as Major Professor
at the last minute.

Mr. Neil Stroesenreuther of the Soil Conservation Service
provided very helpful input during the planning stages and
all the Soil Conservation Service field personal collected
the original data making this project feasable. Thanks
are extended for all their efforts.

Thanks are also due to Terry Furjanich, Ken Parrish
and Karen Phillips for their help in typing and editing.
Finally, special thanks are given to Nancy Lumbert for her
tireless enthusiasm, typing and organizational skills and
her endless patience during this project.

iii

TABLE OF CONTENTS

LIST OF TABmS O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
LIS T OF FIGU Ra O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O

1.
2.

INTRODUCTION 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0

LITERATURE REVIEW . . . . . . . . . . . . . .,

The Conservation Needs Inventory
Soil Management Groups and Units . . . . .
Soils and Land Use of Michigan .
Prime, Unique, Good, and Essential Farmland

PR OCEDURES O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0

Introduction . . .

scape O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0
Definition of terms . . . . . . . . . . . .
Sampling Methods . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Analytic Procedures . . . . . . . . . . . .
DISCUSSION 0 O O O O O O O O 0 O O O O O O O O
LEA 92 O O O O O O I O O O O O O O O O O 0
$0118 0 O O O O O O O 0 O O O O O O O O
Larld use 0 O O O O O O O O 0 O O O O O 0
$0118 811d Lmd use 0 O O O I O O O O O 0
Potential Futw e Uses . . . . . . . . .
m 93 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
Soils . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Land Use 0 O I O O O O O O O O O O O O
Soils and Land Use . . . . . . . . . . .
Potential Future Uses . . . . . . . . .
LRA 9aN O O O O I O O O O O O O O O O O O 0
$0118 0 O O O O O I O O O O O O O O O 0
Land Use 0 O O I I O O O O O 0 O O O
Soils and Land Use . . . . . . . . . . .
Potential Future Uses . . . . . . . . .
LRA gas 0 I O I O I O O O O O O O O O O O 0
$0118 0 O I O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0
Land Use . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Soils and Land Use . . . . . . . . . . .
Potential Future Uses . . . . . . . . .
LN 96 O O I O O O O O O O 0 O O O O O O 0

iv

Page
. vi

.xiii

O O O .
\OCDO\\A kn H

C O O O O
H
U

N
N

4:-
U

Soils .
Land Use
Soils and

Potential

LRA 97 . . .
Soils . .
Land Use
Soils and
Potential

LRA 98 . . .
80113 e 0
Land Use
Soils and
Potential

LRA99 . . .
50113 e 0
Land Use
Soils and
Potential

LRA 111 . . .
Soils . .
Land Use
Soils and
Potential

5. CONCLUSIONS . .
6. NEED FOR FURTHER
LITERATURE CITED . .
APPENDICES . . . . .

QHEQ’UMUOUHF

Land use by SMU in
Land use by SMU in
Land use by SMU in
Land use by SMU in
Land use by SMU in
Land use by SMU in
Land use by SMU in
Land use by SMU in LRA 99
Land use by SMU in LRA 11
SMG's, Their Included Series,

%
Future Useé
Future Useé

;

Future Use

5555555
asaeess

m2

1

Percent of Michigan . . . .

Ac

0
O
O
O
O
O
r
O

ego-000....

09.0.0000...

3%

21.7

LIST OF TABLES

Table
1. Land uses and their percentages by LRA . . . . .
2. Standard error of the CNI . . . . . . . . . . .
3. Soil management groups in Michigan . . . . . . .
h. SMG's, their acreage, and percentage of LRA 92 .
5. Land uses and percentage of slape classes in SMG
0a in LRA92 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
6.. Land uses and percentage of SMG Ob in LRA 92 . .
7. Land uses and percentage of slape classes in SMG
1I$ in LRA 92 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
8. Land uses and percentage of slepe classes in SMG
Ba’a in LRA 92 e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e
9. Land uses and percentage of slape classes in SMG
5I3a in LRA 92 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
10. Use of potentially prime farmland in LRA 92 .
11. Use of potentially good farmland in LRA 92 . . .
12. SMG's, their acreage, and percentage of LRA 93 .
13. Land uses and percentage of slope classes in SMG
2I5a in LRA 93 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
14. Land uses and percentage of slope classes in SMG
33-8. in LRA 93 e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e
15. Land uses and percentage of slepe classes in SMG
“a in LRA 93 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
16. Land uses and percentage of slope classes in SMG
ua-a in LRA 93 e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e
17. Land uses and percentage of slape classes in SMG

58131 LRA 93 e e e e e e e e e o e e e e e 0

vi

Page

18
20

23

26
26

27

29

29
31
31
33

36

36

38

38

39

LIST OF TABLES - Continued.

of slape classes in SMG

of slape classes in SMG

farmland in LRA 93 . .

Use of potentially good farmland in LRA 93 . . .

SMG's, their acreage, and percentage of LRA 94N

of slape classes in SMG

of SMG Ob in LRA 94N .
of SMG 1c in LRA 94N .
of slepe classes in SMG

of slepe classes in SMG

of slape classes in SMG

of slape classes in SMG

of SMG 5b in LRA 94N .
of slope classes in SMG

of SMG Mc-a in LRA 94N
of SMG M/4c in LRA 94m
farmland in LRA 94N . .

Use of potentially good farmland in LRA 94N . .

SMG's, their acreage, and percentage of LRA 948

Table
18. Land uses and percentage
5.3a in LRA 93 . . .
19. Land uses and percentage
Me in LRA 93. . . .
20. Use of potentially prime
21.
22.
23. Land uses and ercentage
GainLRA Neeee
24. Land uses and percentage
25. Land uses and percentage
26. Land uses and ercentage
3a in LRA N . . . .
27. Land uses and ercentage
4a in LRA N . . . .
28. Land uses and ercentage
5a in LRA N . . . .
29. Land uses and percentage
5.38.1nLRA9l-FN...
30. Land uses and percentage
31. Land uses and ercentage
Mc in LRA N . . . .
32. Land uses and percentage
33. Land uses and percentage
34. Use of potentially prime
35-
36.
37. Land uses and ercentage
1a in LRA S . . . .

of slape classes in SMG

vii

Page

39

4O
42
42
44

47
47
48

48

48

50

50
52

52
53
53
55
55

‘ 57

60

LIST OF TABLES - Continued

of slepe classes in SMG

of slape classes in SMG

of slape classes in SMG

of slepe classes in SMG

of slepe classes in SMG

of slepe classes in SMG

of slape classes in SMG

of slape classes in SMG

of slepe classes in SMG

of SMG 5b in LRA 94S .
of SMG 5c in LRA 94S .
of slape classes in SMG

of slape classes in SMG

of slape classes in SMG

Use of potentially prime farmland in LRA 94S . .

Use of potentially good farmland in LRA 94S . .

SMG's, their acreage, and percentage of LRA 96 .

Table
38. Land uses and ercentage
1b in LRA 9 S . . . .
39. Land uses and percentage
1.5a in LRA 94S . . .
40. Land uses and percentage
1.5b in LRA 94S . . .
41. Land uses and percentage
2.5a inLRA 94$ . . .
42. Land uses and ercentage
3a in LRA S . . . .
43. Land uses and ercentage
“a in LRA S I I I I
44. Land uses and percentage
4/2a in LRA 94S . . .
45. Land uses and percentage
4/2b in LRA 94$ . . .
46. Land uses and ercentage
5a in LRA S . . . .
4?. Land uses and percentage
48. Land uses and percentage
49. Land uses and percentage
5.3a in LRA 94$ . . .
50. Land uses and percentage
5.7a in LRA 94$ . . .
51. Land uses and ercentage
Me in LRA S . . . .
52.
53-
54.
55. Land uses and percentage

3a in LRA 96 . . . .

of slape classes in SMG

viii

Page
60
61
62

62

63

65

65

66
67
67

68

69

71
73
73
75

77

LIST OF TABLES - Continued

Table Page
56. Land uses and percentage of slepe classes in SMG

“a in LRA 96 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 80
57. Land uses and percentage of slope classes in SMG

y in LRA 96 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 81
58. Land uses and percentage of slepe classes in SMG

5033 in LRA 96 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 82
59. Land uses and percentage of SMG 5c in LRA 96 . . . 85
60. Land uses and percentage of SMG Mc in LRA 96 . . . 85
61. Use of potentially prime farmland in LRA 96 . . . 87
62. Use of potentially good farmland in LRA 96 . . . . 87
63. Use of SMU's that include at least 5% unique farm-

land in LRA 96 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 88
64. SMG's, their acreage, and percentage of LRA 97 . . 91
65. Land uses and percentage of slepe classes in SMG

205a in LRA 97 I e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e 94
66. Land uses and percentage of slape classes in SMG

38. in LRA 97 e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e 95
67. Land uses and percentage of slape classes in SMG

3/58. in LRA 97 e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e 96
68. Land uses and percentage of slape classes in SMG

“a in LRA 97 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 97
69. Land uses and percentage of SMG 5c in LRA 97 . . . 98
70. Land uses and percentage of slope classes in SMG

5b in LRA 97 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 98
71. Land uses and percentage of slape classes in SMG

5.3a in LRA 97 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 99
72. ,Land use and percentage of SMG Me in LRA 97 . . . 101
73. Use of potentially prime farmland in LRA 97 . . . 103
74. Use of potentially good farmland in LRA 97 . . . . 103
75. Use of SMU's that include at least 5% unique farm-

land in LRA 97 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1on

ix

LIST OF TABLES - Continued

SMG's, their acreage. and percentage of LRA 98 .

Table
76.
77. Land uses and percentage
1.5ainLRA 98 . . .
78. Land uses and percentage
79. Land uses and percentage
80. Land uses and percentage
ZosainLRA98 coo
81. Land uses and percentage
82.‘ Land uses and percentage
83. Land uses and gercentage
3a in LRA 9 . . . .
89. Land uses and percentage
85. Land uses and percentage
86. Land uses and percentage
3/5ainLRA 98 . . .
87. Land uses and percentage
88. Land uses and percentage
89. Land uses and percentage
ha in.LRA 98 . . . .
90. Land uses and percentage
91. Land uses and percentage
92. Land uses and gercentage
5a in LRA 9 . . . . .
93. Land uses and gercentage
5b in LRA 9 . . . .
9“. Land uses and percentage
95. Land uses and percentage
5.3a in LRA 98 . . .
96. Land uses and percentage

5.7a in LRA 98 .. . .

X

of slape classes in SMG

of SMG 1.5b in LRA 98 .
of SMG 1.5c in LRA 98 .
of slope classes in SMG

of SMG 2.5b in LRA 98 .
of SMG 2.5c in LRA 98 .
of slope classes in SMG

of SMG 3b in LRA 98 . .
of SMG 3c in LRA 98 . .

of lepe classes in SMG

of SMG 3/5b in LRA 98 .
of SMG 3/5c in LRA 98 .
of slape classes in SMG

of SMG hb in LRA 98 . .
of SMG no in LRA 98 . .

of sIOpe classes in

of slape classes in

of SMG 5c in LRA 98 . .

of sloPe classes in

of slape classes in

Page
107

110
111

. 111

112
113
113

. 115

116
116

117
118
118

119
120
120

122

123
123

129

125

LIST OF TABLES - Continued

Table

97-

98.

99-
100.
101.
102.
103.
109.
105.

106.
107.
108.
109.
110.
111.
112.
113.
119.
115.
116.

117.
118.
119.

Land uses and

percentage of slape classes in SMG
Me in LRA 9 . .

Use of potentially prime farmland in LRA 98 . .
Use of potentially good farmland in LRA 98 . . .
SMG's, their acreage, and percentage of LRA 99 .

Land
Land
Land
Land
Land

uses

uses

uses

uses

uses

and percentage
and percentage
and percentage
and percentage

and percentage

2.5a in LRA 99 . . .

Land
Land
Land
Land
Land
Land
Land

uses

uses

uses

uses

uses

uses

uses

and percentage
and percentage
and percentage
and percentage
and percentage
and percentage

and percentage

Use of potentially prime

of SMG 1b in LRA 99 .

of SMG 10 in LRA 99 . .
of SMG 1.5b in LRA 99 .
of SMG 1.5c in LRA 99 .
of slape classes in SMG

of SMG 2.5b in LRA 99 .
of SMG 2.5c in LRA 99 .
of SMG 3/2b in LRA 99 .
of SMG 9/2b in LRA 99 .
of SMG 9b in LRA 99 . .
of SMG 5b in LRA 99 . .
of SMG 5c in LRA 99 . .
farmland in LRA 99 . .

Use of potentially good farmland in LRA 99 . . .

SMG's, their acreage. and percentage of LRA 111

Land uses and percentage
1.5a in LRA 111 . . .

Land uses and percentage

Land uses and percentage

Land uses and percentage
2.5a in LRA 111 . . .

xi

of slape classes in SMG

of SMG 1.5b in LRA 111
of SMG 1.5c in LRA 111
of slape classes in SMG

Page

128
129
129
131
139
139
135
135

136
137
137
139
139
190
192
192
193
193
196

199
150
150

151

LIST OF

Table

120.
121.
122.
123.

Use
Use
Use

Use

TABLES - Continued

of potentially prime farmland in LRA 111 .
of potentially good farmland in LRA 111 .

of potentially prime farmland in Michigan
of potentially good farmland in.Michigan .

xii

Page
153
153
157
157

LIST OF FIGURES

Figure Page
1. Land Resource Areas of Michigan . . . . . . . . . 9

xiii

1. INTRODUCTION

Michigan provides a wide variety of soils and land
uses. It's glacial history provides the state with youth-
ful soils rich in nutrients capable of supporting lush
forests in the north and productive farms in the south.

The humid continental climate provides a limited growing
season and ample moisture for it's diverse flora and fauna.

As recent as 19,800 years ago (Sommers et al, 1978)
glacial ice covered most of the state. Moving ice and
meltwaters provided a complex pattern of glacial landforms
burying the bedrock in most places. These moraines, till
plains, outwash and lake plains, and other glacial land-
forms provided the sediments in which our modern soils
have formed.

When the early Europeans came to Michigan most of the
soils were covered with vast forests. The early Michiganders
cleared the forests and established a lucrative agriculture.
Currently agriculture and forestry are the two major land
.uses in Michigan, Table 1.

The Conservation Needs Inventory (CNI) was established
to inventory these varied soil resources and land uses.
Inventories were made in 1958 and in 1967. It is the data
from 1967 that forms the basis for this study.

1

«.6 case econ I eoeuv I .9.

   

 

 

 

 

     

 

 

 

 

 

. 999.99 ..9 9.99. 9 .9 99. 99 . «9.. 9.99. 9 .9.9.9 9.99 . .. ..<.99
n.99. .99. «m.. 9. .9.~wa w o n. . 99 9 9 w«.99m 9.9 www.mme u...9
9.? “M9 .96. .m. n 9.99 a a. 909.39 m Mu 3.3 .. 9.0... .u .999 999.99
a. . ~.. . ~.n “no.9n 9 u 9 ..nm. 99.un 9.. 99m." 999.999
9.“. 9 .. a... .2. .A. 9 a 9.89.. “.3 .99. .. .99 9. . 9 23.989 5
9.. 999.9.9 . 9.9.9 9 9 .9. .9 ~99. m.~. 9... u. ..au.

.9 9.9.999. ..M «09.9 o M .99.9~n n.9. n99 . . .99. . 9.9.
«.9. 99..99..~ ..9. ~99.9~ .. . u «.999 9.9. 999.9 .. a... «99.9.. .9999 999
9.9 n...9.9. u... . m 9 ..~99 9... 999.999 9 9 9~ .u 99.999 ...-9
Bomb “womb. New. O N o. e.“ d “OUd . d o :80 ”0*

9.99. an... ... .99 99 .9. 99 .9. 99 .9.

.99. 999..99.. .99. 999...“.9 9.99 99 . 9.9 9.99. 999.999.“ 9.99. 999.999 ..<.99
“.9 9n9.m9 m.n 99..99 9.. 9.“.9m 9.. 999.Mm 9.9 “~9.9 ucgao
9..9 999. 99 ..9 MN9.~ .9 n..9 9.9.9.9.. «.99 ~99. 9.. 9..9 ..999 ...uo.
9.9 .99.99. 9.9 .9~.. . «.9 999.99 9.. n .99 9.~ .9 .9 .99....
...9 ”99.99. «.9. .99... .9 oo...9. ..o 9....«9 9. ..9 999.9999 ...
m.9 9.99 .9 .9.9~ 9.9 9 .9. 9 u .9. 999 ..999

.9. 9 .99. 9.9 .9.99. 9.. .99 9.. 9.m9 9.. .99.9 ..9.
«.9 99..9~. ..9 999..99 9.9 m .99 9.9 99 . .. .. 999.9 99999 999
9.9 999.99 ”mm 9.9”..9 mm“ 999..9 1mm" MM9H9.. .m. n .9. 9:.nuwu..unu

. .9 . 9mu9~mm., 11", nun-qua. anw gnawmua ww hkmwaauxw iluypuuuu
99 .9. 9.9 .9. 9.9 .9. n9 .9. 99 .9.

.<¢a a; ecu-accuse: haeso use eons o:eaun.. 9.9-9

3

The purposes of this study were two-fold. First,
an evaluation of land use and soil relationships was wanted.
It was done on a regional basis using the U.S.D.A. Land
Resource Areas (LRA'S) shown in Figure 1. Within each LRA
the soils information was evaluated using Michigan's Soil
Management Groups and Units (SMG's and SMU's).

The second basic purpose of this study was to provide
interested users information from the CNI in a form easier
for them to use. The appendices are filled with land use
information by SMU's in each LRA of Michigan (Appendix A
to 1) plus the soil series, and acreage in each SMG and it's
percentage of the CNI inventory acreage.

l4.

 

 

U. 5. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE

0
N

Superior Lake Plain
93 Northern Michigan and Wisconsin Stony, Sandy
and Rocky Plains and Hills

  
  
  
   
    

'°' 29;. u- 94 Northem Michigan Sandy Drift
‘ 96 Western Michigan Fruit Belt
. r 97 Southwestern Michigan Fruit and Truck Belt
as- - 98 Southern Michigan Drift Plain

99 Erie-Huron Lake Plain
Indiana and Ohio Till Plain

SAOIMAW

Figure 1. Land Resource Areas of Michigan.

 

 

2. LITERATURE REVIEW

The Conservation Needs Inventory

The Conservation Needs Inventory was established
by the Secretary of Agriculture (Benson, 1956) in 1956.
The general policies are outlined below:

1. An inventory of soil and water conservation needs
would be made and kept current.

2. The Soil Conservation Service was to provide
leadership to the many co-operating agencies.

3. A committee was to be formed with representives
of each of the co-operating agencies. The committee would
help develop and review procedures and guide the progress
of the inventory.

4. A state committee was to be formed from co-operators
within each state or territory. It would develop a plan
for it's state inventory.

5. Data was to be developed separately for privately
and publicly owned lands.

6. Co-operation from state and local sources would
be solicited in the development and review of the inventory.

The basic purpose of the CNI was to gather data on
land use. soils, conservation needs and watersheds
(Conservation Needs Committee, 1960). Procedures were

established to obtain statistically reliable results based
‘ 5

6
on their sampling methods and intensity (Adams, 1964 and
Conservation Needs Committee, 1960).

The data for the 1958 inventory was unavailable for
use in this study.

In 1967 land use, with minor sampling changes, was
updated on the 1958 sampling areas (Soil Conservation Service,
1965 and Conservation Needs Committee, 1968). It is the
1967 data that forms the basis for this study.

Aside from the information contained in this study
much is available from the 1967 CNI. The Conservation
Needs Committee, 1968, provided land use and treatment
needs information by Land Capability Sub-class and county.
The Soil Conservation Service, 1979, has provided updated
tables of soils. land use and treatment needs by Land
Capability Unit (LCU), LRA and county.

Other uses have been made of the CNI. Arnold et a1.
1960, used the 1958 CNI for Iowa to estimate slope classes
by counties and Lee, 1978, used the 1967 data to estimate
changes in cropland availability on a national basis.

The CNI in Michigan has been used to estimate trends
in agricultural land use (Whiteside and Schaner,1972)
and as supporting data for attempts to preserve essential

and unique farmlands (Agricultural Land Subcommittee, 1974).

Soil Management Groups and Units
Mokma and Robertson. 1976, defined SMG's as a combination

of soil series with similar dominant profile textures, natural

drainage classes and other characteristics (acidity, carbonates,

7

etc.). Numbers from O to 5.7 are given to dominant profile
textures and lower case letters a, b or c are given for well
drained, somewhat poorly drained and poorly drained groups,
respectively. The Soil Management Unit (SMU) is a combination
of the SMG, slope class and erosion class.

SMG's have been used extensively in Michigan for
intrepretive uses such as crop yield potentials (Warncke
and Christenson, 1980), evaluation of farmland and it's
use (Priest et al, 1963), estimates of success with no-till
corn (Robertson et al, 1976), estimates of organic matter
levels in cornfields (Mokma et al, 1976) and the design of
drainage systems (Engberg et al, 1963).

SMG's have also been used for non-agricultural uses.
Such uses have included comparison of performance of septic
tank disposal fields (Mokma and Whiteside, 1972) and the
design of systems for municipal waste water disposal
(Schneider and Erickson, 1972). The degree of limitation
for uses such as residential development (with and without
public sewers), highway construction, and parks and recr-
eational uses have also been developed (Mokma et al, 1979).

The use of SMG's is unique to Michigan, however, North
Carolina is using a similar interpretive classification system
(Buol et al, 1975). Their system is called the Fertility
Capability Soil Classification System, and it's similarities
include classification by dominant texture, units for two
storied soils and provision for special conditions such
as acid or basic reaction or calcareous conditions.

The Soil Conservation Service uses a Land Capability

8

Classification system for interpretative purposes (Klingebiel
and Montgomery, 1961). They first group soils into eight
classes based on degree of limitation for agricultural produc-
tion. Classes are broken down into sub-classes by kinds of
limitations, such as erosion, rooting zone, climate or wetness
problems. Land Capability Units (LCU's) are groups of similar
soils within a sub-class. LCU's approximate the same degree
of generalization as the SMU's and were provided with the CNI.

Soils and Land Use of Michigan
Soils and land use in.Michigan have been studied

and described many times. In 1938, in conjunction with the
then new classification system (U.S.D.A., 1938), soil areas
were described, some of which were from Michigan. Kellogg
(1951) also briefly described some of Michigan's soils.

Veatch (1953) provided the first comprehensive
description and map of Michigan's soils and land use. He
provided a fairly detailed classification of the contemporary
soil series and discussed soil associations. He also
discussed use and significance of different soil groups
(for example, peat and muck soils and hilly sandy soils
in southern Michigan).

Hill and Mawby (1959) discussed types of farming in
Michigan and divided the state into 17 type-of-farming
areas that approximated the LRA's. In the same bulletin
Schneider provided and discussed a soil association map
based on Veatch's work. Whiteside et al (1968) also used

Veatch's basic association map and discussed soils and land

use trends in Michigan.

Recent land use trends are discussed in many places
(Conservation Needs Committee, 1958, Whiteside and Schaner,
1972, Wright, 1974, Michigan Department of Agriculture, 1975,
Sommers et al, 1978 and Wright and Ferris 1981). Most of
these agree that urbanization is encrouching upon needed
agricultural lands and some method is needed to preserve

agricultural lands.

Prime, Unigue. Good and Essential Farmland

Mokma et al (1980) defined prime farmland as land
best suited for crop production that gives highest sustained
yields with minimum inputs and results in the least damage
to the environment. They also provided a list of soil
series and their phases in Michigan that would qualify as
prime farmland. The Soil Conservation Service (1980) listed
current mapping units in Michigan that would qualify as
prime farmland. They also defined unique farmland as
non-prime farmlands used for the production of special crops.
Unique lands have characteristics which produce high quality
or yields of those special crops. Unique cropland was re-
stricted in this study to lands in LRA 96 and 97 on which
fruit crops were grown.

Specific criteria for good farmland was provided
by Whiteside (1981). It was to be non-prime farmland
capable of moderate to high quality and yields with moderate
inputs. This defination included the non-prime lands of
the essential farmlands defined by the Agricultural Land

10

Subcommittee (1974). They combined prime, unique and good
farmland and called it essential farmland because they
believed it was essential to Michigan's agricultural future.

The desire to preserve essential farmland has been
recognized at the national level also. Lee (1978) con-
cluded that between 1967 and 1975, 4.5 million acres of prime
farmland was lost to competing uses and that a great need
exists to study the costs of developing essential farmland.
Larson (1981) suggested that by the year 2000 the nation's
cropland will be fully used to fill the demand for agricultural
products. Gray (1981), Gordon (1981) and Lee (1981) also
expressed concern that future expansion of cropland would

have to come from non-prime lands.

3. PROCEDURES

Introduction
The 1967 Soil and Water Conservation Needs Inventory

was a part of the National Inventory of Soil and Water
Conservation Needs established by the Secretary of
Agriculture in 1956 (Benson, 1956). Agencies co-operating
in the 1967 inventory were:
United States Department of Agriculture
Agriculture Stabilization and Conservation Service
Economic Research Service
Farmers Home Administration
Forest Service
Soil Conservation Service
Statistical Reporting Service
United States Department of Commerce
Environmental Science Series Administration,
State Climatologist
United States Department of Interior
Fish and Wildlife Service
Bureau of Sports, Fisheries and Wildlife
State of Michigan
Department of Agriculture
Department of Economic Expansion

Department of Education
11

12
Vocational Education Division

Department of Natural Resources
Water Resources Commission
Michigan State University
College of Agriculture and Natural Resources
Michigan Associatiofi‘of Soil Conservation Districts, Inc.

State Soil Conservation Committee

The objectives of the inventory were to develop detailed
data on land use and conservation treatment needs by soils
and obtain data on watershed project needs.

The 1958 Conservation Needs inventory was commissioned
in 1956, and data was collected between January, 1958 and
January 1960. 'All data referred to 1958. Data from 1958
was unavailable for this study, however, summaries are
available ( Conservation Needs Committee, 1960).

In 1965 an update was commissioned and field work
was completed in 1967. It is the primary data from the
1967 inventory that forms the basis for this study.

At the time of this writing there is another update
in progress that should be finished by 1982 or 1983.

Soaps
The total land area of Michigan according to the

1967 CNI was 36,514,587 acres. This figure does not
include lakes and water areas greater than 40 acres in
size, or streams greater than one-eight of a mile in

width. The actual inventory acreage for 1967 was 31,013,053

13
acres. This figure was determined by subtracting from the

total all non-included federal land (2,767,095 acres),
urban and built-up land (2,594,730 acres) and small water

areas (139,709 acres).

Definition of Terms

1. Federal land: Land owned by the federal government,
except cropland operated under lease or permit and
Indian lands owned by individuals or tribes which are
under trusteeship. These federal lands were not part
of the inventory and are primarily national forests,
military installations, wildlife refuges and hospitals.

2. Urban and Built-up Areas: These were cities, villages
and areas greater than 10 acres in size that were built-
up industrial sites, railroad yards, cemeteries,
airports, golf courses, shooting ranges, institutional
and public administrative sites and similar types of
areas. These were not included in the inventory.

3. Water Areas: These included ponds and lakes between 2
and 40 acres in size and rivers and streams less than
one-eight mile in width.

4. Cropland: The following types of cropland were included
in the inventory:

A. Tillage Rotation
(1) Field Crops
a. Row Crops
(1) Corn and Sorghum: included corn and

sorghum whether grown in rows or

b.

Ce

(2)

(3)

14

broadcast, and regardless of use (grain,
silage or forage).

All other row crops: included soybeans,
sugarbeets, field beans, vegetables,
potatoes and all other cultivated row
crops.

Summer fallow: was usually cropland in

semi-arid areas being fallowed.

Small Grains (close grown row crops):

included small grains (wheat, barley and

oats) and other close-seeded crops not

usually grown in rows and tilled. These

type craps were included even if they were

used for temporary hay or pasture.

Sod Crops:

(1)

(2)

(3)

Rotation hay and pasture: was grasses

or legumes used for hay or pasture as
part of a crop rotation management system.
Hayland: was land permanently used for
forage. Stand improvement measures had
been taken. Also included were other
areas where hay or seed was harvested and
then pastured or allowed to grow forage.
Conservation use only: was cropland in
grasses, legumes or small grains that
were not harvested or pastured. This
included land diverted from cropland

by federal programs.

15

B. Idle

(1) Temporarily idle cropland: was land in none
of the other crOpland uses but had been during
one or more of the previous three years.

(2) Open land formerly used for crops: was the
same as temporarily idle cropland, except it
had not been used for three years and was not
being purposely converted to another use.

C. Orchards, Vineyards and Bush Fruit: was land in
fruit production regardless of intertilling or
pasturing.

5. Pasture Land: was land in grasses or other long term
forage that was used primarily for grazing. It did
not include rotation hay and pasture defined under
cropland. It could contain up to a 10 percent canopy~
of timber or shade trees.

6. ForeSt Land: was land at least 10 percent stocked by
forest trees of any size and capable of producing.
timber or wood products. Land on which the trees were
removed to less than 10 percent and was not develOped
for any other purpose and planted forests (grazed or
ungrazed) were also forest land. Included was forested
non-federal parks, wildlife refuges and the like.

7. Other Lands: were,rural, non-federal land not falling
into any of the other land use classes or non-inventory
groups. It included farmsteads, fence rows, feedlots,
non-farm residences and their acreage, investment

acreage and dunes and marshes not used for grazing.

16

8. Prime Farmland: Land with the best combination of physical
and chemical characteristics for producing food, feed,
forage, fiber and oilseed crops. It has the quality,
growing season, and moisture supply needed to produce
a sustained high yield of crops when managed (including
water management) and treated according to acceptable
farming methods. Prime farmlands have adequate and
dependable water supply (from precipitation or irrigation),
temperature and growing season that is favorable, no
extremes in reaction, a reasonable salt and sodium
content, few or no coarse fragments, good permeability
to air and water, not excessively erodible, not
saturated with water for long periods of time and do
not flood frequently or are protected from flooding.
These soils must be on slopes less than 6 percent and
have none, slight or moderate erosion., Included SMG's
are 1a, 1b, 1c, 1.5a, 1.5b, 1.5c, 2.5a, 2.5b, 2.5c, 2.5c-c,
2.5c-s, 2.5c-cs, 3a, 3a-m, 3a-s, 3b, 3b-s, 3c, 3c-s,
3/1a. 3/1b. 3/19, 3/2a. 3/2b. 3/29, 3/5a. B/Sa-a. 3/5a-m.
3/5b, 3/59, L-2a, and L-2c. Potentially prime farmland
is used for lands in these SMG's because it is not known
if they do meet the specific criteria, even though they
are capable of meeting it.

9. Unique Farmland: Land other than prime that is used to
produce a specific high value food or fiber crop. It
has the specific conditions (location, soil quality,
growing season, etc.) to maintain high yields of the

specific crop when treated and managed according to

1?

acceptable farming methods. It has been used here
only for non-prime farmlands in LRA 96 and 97 upon
. which fruit crops were grown.

10. Good Farmland: Land, excluding prime and unique farmland
that is capable of producing reasonably high crop
qualities and yields when managed and treated according
to modern methods of farming. These lands will eco-
nomically produce moderate crop yields with low or mod-
erate inputs of energy and capital. Included SMG's
(Whiteside, 1981) are all non-prime SMG's except 4/Ra,
5a, 5a-h, 5a-m, 5.3a, 5.7a, 5b, 5b-h, Mc-a, Ga, Gbc,
G/Ra, Ra and Rho (Table 3). Slopes must not exceed 18
percent (12 percent for soils in SMG's 0a, 0b, and 0c)
and erosion must be moderate or less, The term potentially
good farmland is used herein because it is not known
if specific areas will meet the specific criteria.

11. Essential Agricultural Land: Essential lands are the
sum of prime lands, good lands and unique farmland.

12. Toposequence: A sequence of soils that differ only in
slope or natural drainage (Jenny, 1980). Thus SMG's
1a, 1b, and 1c form a toposequence within a LRA.

13. Lithosequence: A sequence of soils that differ only in
parent material (Jenny, 1980). SMG's 0a, 1a, 1.5a, etc.
form a lithosequence within a LRA.

M Methods
For the 1958 data the statistical Labratory at Iowa

State University randomly selected a 2 percent sample for

18
each county. This was done such that 3 quarter sections
per township were selected. Two sets of sample areas
were selected for each county. In counties of 250,000
to 500,000 acres in size only one set of sample areas were
used. Adams (1964) reported that at the 2 percent sample

rate the error would occur as presented in Table 2.

Table 2.--Standard error of the CNI

 

Percent of area havigg Relative standard error(£)

the condition 922931 gtggg

1 59 5.9

5 26 2.6

10 18 1.8

25 10 1.0

50 6 0.6

75 3 0.3

100 0 0

The average sized county was figured to have 48 sample
areas in it. The average sized state was assumed to contain
100 average sized counties. All LRA's in Michigan are larger
than the average sized county making all errors smaller than
those reported for the county-sized areas.

Counties exceeding 500,000 acres had a reduced sampling
rate and counties smaller than 250,000 acres were sampled
more intensively to maintain the same approximate degree
of precision.

The 1967 update used a point sampling method. A

template containing rows of dots was centered on each of the

19
mapped areas and spun. Where each dot occurred (36 per
sample area) on the map a sample point was located.

Each of the sampling points were visited and land use
and conservation treatment needs were determined. The area
in the vicinity of the point, not just the point, was
considered in assigning land use and treatment needs.

Those points that fell in a farm pond of less than 2 acres
were considered to be on the adjoining uplands. If a
point fell on a soil boundary the point was considered to
be in the map unit north or east of the line.

When the field work was done the data was coded onto
forms and sent to Iowa State University. An expansion
factor was calculated for each county such that the sum
of the acreages equaled the total county inventory acreage
(number of data points times the expansion factor).

The Iowa expansion factors and all data from the coded
forms was punched onto computer cards and transfered to

magnetic tape for computer processing.

Analytic Proceduggg

In 1978 a copy of the tape containing the 1967 CNI
data for Michigan was ordered from the Iowa State University
Statistical Laboratory. The tape was stored in the Computer
Laboratory at Michigan State University. Computer processing
was done by the Control Data Corporation 6500 computer.

A program was written to add the SMG's (Table 3) to
each of the 145,467 data points. After the SMG's had been
added the data was grouped by LRA. Within each LRA the

20

Table 3.--Soil management youps in Michigan

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

11.-IMO“
M“ OlgnIeSeiHM)
VayPeedyM
Well-d M Mud .
Def-their!“ My PeelIy chPoedy m5!”
manna-d Duh-cl Dated lc-Sl'thick duck
W a I: e e e
FhsGthvIM) 0 0a 0b 0c
WHO-608) 1 la 1b 1e Mlle
Chybcnanddkydsyhcn 1.5 1.5a 1.5!: 15¢
Macadamia-n 2.5 2.5a 2.5b 25c
Sady Iona. 14-0". 0'! clay 3/1 311s 3/lb 3/1e
www.mb-todky
chyhun 3/2 3/2: W 3/2c
Sandy 1.9. 3 3. 3b 3c me. Me
Surly loan. W, over and and
gnvd 3/5 3/5. am am.-
Lonny and. 1440". over clay 4/1 4/1e Ulb Ulc
Lonny and. 2040". on has to
silty clay has 4/2 4/2: U21: 4/2:
[my and 4 4. 4b 4c
Send to Ice-y and. 40-0”, over
hunted-y 8/2 5/2: me 5e
Send with m a slug subsoil
develops-l 5.0 Se 5!: 5c- MM:
Sand with minimal 999 3.999-
Sendwthnub Namep- 5'3 5‘3. Sb 5°
eras
III-It ' 5.7 5.7a Sb St
“or Mandala-In C On Che Che
or Am I. L-Me
lousy 1.2 L-Za L-Se L-Re
sandy L4 L4- L-4e Late
Had a _ . M/ne
scents-99920- R Re I Rbc I Rbe
Loan 2040'. over bedrock 2/R 2/Ile ? ‘
Sandy 199. 2040-. 99 bedrock am am. i am» i am..- we.
Seedmbayandwmverbedo ' i
99 an an. |l use. g um).
(dhfiefobvhgnbpeehsbmmsdbdmmewwmmmuwPhamwflmM
Web-z Ago-“dope DalS—laidope
3.2.0!” 2318-”!

cue-12599.- Pass-H.99-

21

data was sorted by major groupings of SMG's. It was then
printed onto print-out sheets.

The primary data was manually sorted for land use
within each SMG. Appendices A through I list each of the
LRA's broken down by land use and SMU. The sorting was
done manually because of bugetary constraints at the time
and took about 42 person months to complete.

All manual work was rechecked and errors were system-
atically reduced until no error exceeded 1.0 percent of a
major grouping of SMG's (for example all SMG's beginning
with a 3 in LRA 98). The residual errors were deducted from
or added to the land use-SMU combination with the greatest
acreage in the largest SMG.

A and B slope classes (0 to 6 percent) were combined
on SMG's beginning with a 4 or a 5 in the appendices.

This was done to be consiStent with recently published

soil surveys. Erosion classes 0, 1 and 2 were also combined
and reported as a single unit as were erosion classed 3, 4
and 5. These changes also agree better with recently
published soil surveys.

In the discussion of Soils and Land Use in each LRA
SMG's were selected for discussion that had at least 30,000

acres or contained 5 percent or more of the LRA.

4 . DISCUSSION

LRA 92

LRA 92, the Superior Lake Plain, is located in the
western end of Michigan's Upper Peninsula (Figure 1). The
total inventory acreage was 607,026 acres. This was 2.0
percent of the state's inventory acreage.

This LRA is characterized by broad flat lake plains.
More than 90 percent was forested in 1967.

Soils

Table 4 lists the acreage of each of the SMG's that
occurred in the LRA and its percentage of the LRA. Fine
textured soils (SMG's 0a, 0b, 1c, 1.5a, and 1.5c) accounted
for 39.9 percent (242,068 acres) of the LRA. Medium tex-
tured soils (SMG's beginning with.a.2 or a 3) occupied 25.9
percent (156,835 acres) of the LRA. Coarse textured soils
(SMG's beginning with a 4 or a 5) occupied 27.7 percent
(167,972 acres) of the LRA. The remaining 6.4 percent
(40,152 acres) was occupied by alluvial, organic or gravelly
soils and non-soil material.

Well drained soils occurred on 78.7 percent (478,083
acres) of the LRA. The somewhat poorly drained soils
occupied 13.3 (81,095 acres) of the LRA. The remaining 7.7
percent (47,620 acres) was occupied by poorly and very
poorly drained soils and non-soil material.

SlOpes were fairly flat with 64.5 percent of the LRA

having less than 6 percent lepes. SIOpes from 6 to 18

22

23

Table 4.--SMG's, their acreage, and percentage of LRA 92.

 

 

SMG Acreage Percent §M§. Acreage ngcegi
0a 74,340 12.2 4a-a 18,908 3.1
0b 31,902 5.3 4b 9,433 1.6
1c 6,667 1.1 4/1b 2,984 0.5
1.5a 125.716 20.7 4/2b 3,902 0.6
1.5c 3,443 0.6 4/2b-s 3,672 0.6
2.5a-a 9,640 1.6 4/20 459 0.1
2.5a-s 22,908 3.8 5a 19,282 3.2
2.5b-s 5,890 1.0 5b 1.37? 0.2
2.5c-s 4,494 0.7 5/2a 230 tr.
3a-a 80,284 13.2 5/2b 11,934 2.0
3b 1,607 0.3 5.3a 68,912 11.4
3b-a 3,115 0.5 L-2c 24,984 4.1
30 208 tr. Mc-a 230 tr.
3/10 459 0.1 M/1c 642 0.1
3/1c 1,148 0.2 M/4c 5,137 0.8
3/2b 4,820 0.8 m/mc 208 tr.
3/Ra 22,262 3.7 Ga 8,721 1.4
4a 26,880 4.4 NHsc. 23% 3;;
TOTAL: 607,02 99.9

tr. = trace - less than 0.1

24
percent accounted for 18.5 percent of the LRA. The other

17.0 percent of the LRA had slopes in excess of 18 percent.

Potentially prime farmland accounted for 24.8 percent
of the total LRA. Potentially good farmland accounted for
an additional 41.5 percent. No unique farmland occurred
in this LRA.

Some soils with acid solums occurred in LRA 92, dis-
tinguishing it from most other LRA's outside the western
Upper Peninsula. These soils occupied 18.5 percent (112,177
acres) of the LRA.

We

The dominant land use in LRA 92 was forestry, Table 1,
It occurred on 91.8 percent of the land. Row cr0ps and
fruit cr0ps occupied trace percentages. Small grains sod
craps and idle accounted for 2.7, 1.4 and 1.6 percent,
respectively. Total cr0p1and and pasture land accounted
for 5.6 and 1.6 percent, respectively. The remaining 0.9

percent was other uses.

W

Appendix A lists the acreage of each of the major land
uses in each of the SMU's in LRA 92.

Table 5 breaks SMG 0a down by SMU'S'and land uses, and
gives percentages of major 310pe classes. There were 689
acres of forested lands on E or higher slopes that are not

included in the table.

25
Note the declining percentage of cropland as lepe

increases. 0n slopes up to 6 percent, 18.6 percent was

. cropland. Cropland dropped to 12.7 percent on slopes from
6 to 18 percent and was absent on slopes greater than 18
percent. Each of the uses within cropland displayed a
similar trend, except row crops which were absent on all
slopes.

Pasture doubled as a percentage of the moderate slopes
relative to the gentle slopes. It was insignificant as a
use on the steeper slopes. Forests occupied about 75 Per-
cent of slopes up to 18 percent, and over 95 Percent of the
steeper slopes.

Since the Ga and 0b soils differ mostly in internal
drainage, the differences in land use, Table 6, can be
roughly attributed to the increased wetness of the 0b soils.

Note the greater percentage of forestry on the same
slopes (A and B) on the wetter soils (0b) as compared to
the same slopes of SMG 0a (Table 5, columns 1 and 2). Crep-
land occupied a greater percentage of land on the dryer
soils, presumably because of the high cost of drainage on
land in a marginal agricultural area, and the problems that
excess soil water causes on soils with short growing seasons.

Comparing uses on soils in the 1.5a SMG, Table 7,
with those in the Ga SMG suggests that the finer soils were
used more intensively that the slightly coarser soils.

Total cropland was 18.6 percent of the gentle slopes of
land in the Ga SMG and only 4.7 percent on the same slopes

26

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

9.99. 999..9 .9990.

mam: 9 9.9.0

9.99 99..9~ .9.999

9.9 9.9 999.999

9.9 999.. 999.9999 ..9

9.9 9 9.99..

9.9 9 9.9.

9.9 999.. 99999 999

9.9 9.9 me..99 .9999

0.0 0 09090 30m

mammmmw ommmmme on:
.99 .9. e. 99 9:9 .9 .9u9999999 9:9 999: 999.--.9 ..999
9.99. 9 9. 9 9.99. H9M.~9 9.99. 999.9 9.99. 9 9.99 .9999.
new: mmmnua 040: 9 mam: 9 949: mmmnu: 9.9.9
9..9 9...99 9.99 999..9 9.M9 99..9 9..9 99.... 99.9.9
9.. 999.9 9.0 099 u. . 9.... 9.9 000.9 999.999
9.9. 999.9 ... 99. 9.9. .9... 9.9. 999.9 999.9990 ..9
9.9 9 9.9 9 9.9 9 9.9 9 p.999
9.. 9.9.9 ... 99. 9.9 99. ..9 999.9 9.9.
m.. .99.. 9.9 9 ..~ 999 9.9 999 99990 999
.. 9.9.9 9.9 9 9.9 99. 9.9 999.9 99.999 ...99
9.9 9 9.9 9 9.9 9 9.9 9 99990 :99
M 0wmeuo¢ M_ ommomo< !M ommoumm M 9mm9904 on

.490... +9 0+0 9.... aloulmu..9._ «9'93

.ma «mg a. 90 02m s. 9009990 99099 no emevseonen use new: useq::.m 99099

2?

 

 

 

 

 

9.99. 9.9.99. 9.99. 9...9. 9.99. 999.99 9.99. ..9.99 ..9999
9.9 999 949:: .mlllll 9.9 9 9.9 999 99999
9.99 99..99. 9.99. 9...9. 9.99 99..99 9..9 999..9 999999
9.9 9.... 9.9 9 ... 999 9.. 9.9 999.999
..9 999.. 9.9 9 9.9 9 9.. 999.. 999.9999 ..9
9.9 9 9.9 9 9.9 9 9.9 9 9.999
..9 99. 9.9 9 9.9 9 9.9 99. 9.9.
..9 99. 9.9 9 9.9 9 9.9 99. 99999 999
9.9 999.9 9.9 9 9.9 9 ..9 999.9 99.999 ..999
9.9 999 9.9 9 9.9 9 9.9 999 99999 399
& {kn mmMmuo¢ R mummho¢ & uiwwmoho< &, 9w9990< .wmo xii!

.9999 +9 0+9 9+9 99999.9 999.9

.mm <mq c9 mm.9 02m :9 9999990 macaw Ho 9&99290999 9:9 mmm: 9cmq:1.9 99999

28
in SMG 1.5a. The moderate slopes showed a similar trend.

Total cropland was 12.7 percent of the moderate slopes on
the finer textured soils, and not present in the SMG 1.5a.

Forest land accounted for 94 percent of the A and B
slopes. 99 percent of the C and D slopes, and 100 percent
of the steeper slopes of the 1.5a SMG.

Table 8 breaks down SMG 3a-a in a similar manner. Note
that cropland increased slightly in importance on the
moderate slopes. 0n the gentle slopes, cropland accounted
for 7.9 percent while it was 8.5 percent of the moderate
slopes. This was entirely attributable to the increase in
percentage of grain crops, which was only 3.0 percent of
the gentle slopes and 7.7 percent of the moderate lepes.
Other cropland uses decreased in percentage as slopes in-
creased.

Pasture land was found only on the moderate slopes
where it occupied 3.1 percent of the lands having those
slopes.

Forest land exceeded 87 percent of all slope groups
and was least on the moderate slopes where small grains
and pasture were slightly more common than on other slopes.

Table 9 breaks down SMG 5.3a by slope and land use.

It displays a pattern similar to that found in the 3a-a
soils. Small grains increased in percentage on the moderate
slopes, whereas other cropland uses were not found on those
slopes. Forests were fairly constant at about 95 Per-

cent of both the slope groups and the total acreage, 10 per-
cent higher than it was on the finer textured 3a-a soils.

29

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

.oofi mhnnmm mwmma mumnwm o.oaH 5mm.mm .g<aoa

o mom a mou mam. o umgpo

5.35 nan.me n.nm oo5.~« «.ma m5o.nm «moses

5.o an: o.c o m.o an: ouspmam

~.a ~mm.~ c.n mum o.: nn~.~ unuanouo Ha<

c.o o o.o o o.o o ensue

n.” was 0.0 o o.« mam oHuH

5.0 an: o.o o o.o an: «mono com

«.5 mos.” o.m mNo m.“ on» magnum Haaam

o.o o o.o o o.c o unouo 30m

M GMGOhO< M Omahoa‘ M oEfloHo< on

q<aoa n+0 m4 mmmmmmm_mmmflm
.Na 45 5 uni cam 5 commode anode no 939.30qu 93 moms vanquim 0.33..
5.55 «.o o.oo« mn~.m 5.55 n . N o.oofi nmu.mm .g<soa
H.w: “HM.” o.e mou w.w Nwwimi «.m. omo H nonpo
«.mm m .«5 o.em ouo.m o.om so .nu n.5m 5dn.n: pmouom
o.« o m o.o o «.n on» o.o o ouapmam
0.5 nmo.o o.o o n.o mm~.~ 5.5 mom.n ceaamouo HH<
o.o o o.o o o.o o o.o . a phage
n.” o5o.H o.o o o.c c «.N 05°.” oHeH
a.“ «a .H o.o o m.o ecu 5.~ saw.” «mono com
s.: an .n o.c c 5.5 55o.~ c.n one.“ manage Hausa
o.o o o.o o o.o o o.o a macho tom

”mmnnnnmmmmmmm m ummummm m ammuum¢u m qmmmmm< on
.289 +m n+0 n+4 ”languipmmflm

.Na :3 5 «ran. cam 5 ...-mode 30.3 no owns-ouch 65. non: 653:6 0.3.9.5

Potential Future Uses

Over 90 percent of LRA 92 was forested even though
about 25 percent of the land in the area was potentially
prime farmland. Potentially good farmland accounted for
about #0 percent more. Thus, two-thirds of the LRA was
potentially good farmland or better. Table 10 and Table 11
indicates the use of the potentially prime and potentially
good farmlands, respectively. Note that only 6.1 percent of
the potentially prime farmlands were used as cropland and
only 7.7 percent of the potentially good farmland was used
as cropland. This indicates an under utilization relative
to agricultural production. As local and world population
increases creating greater needs for food and forage pro-
duction, a large acreage in LRA 92 could be shifted from
forest uses into agricultural production.

30

Table 10.--Use of potentially prime farmland in LRA 92.

31

Percent

 

 

EE? Aegease
Row Crops 230
Small Grains 6,h1h
Sod Crops 1,312
Idle 1,1h8
Fruit 0
All Cropland 9,10h
Pasture 1,836
Forest 138,661
Other 682

150,287

TOTAL:

0.2
h.3
0.9
0.8
0.0
6.1
1.2

92.3
9&5
100.1

Table 11.--Use of potentially good farmland in LRA 92.

 

Egg Acreage
Row CrOps 0
Small Grains 8,15“
Sod Crops 5.90?
Idle 5,#31
Fruit 0
All Cropland 19,#92
Pasture 5.979
Forest 223.“53
Other 24.8.2.2
TOTAL: 251,771

Percent

 

0.0
3.2
2.3
.2.2
0.0
7.7
2.4
88.8
1,;
100.0

LRA 23

LRA 93, the Northern Michigan and Wisconsin Stony,
Sandy and Rocky Plains and Hills, occupies most of the
western two-thirds of the upper peninsula (Figure 1). The
total inventory acreage was 5,035,532 acres. This was 16.2
percent of the state's inventory acreage.

This LRA is characterized by broad flat plains, rolling
hills, and large areas of organic soils. Over 90 percent
of the area was forested in 1967.

Soils

Table 12 lists the acreage of each of the SMG's that
occured in the LRA and their percentage of the LRA. Fine
textured soils (SMG's 0a, Ob, 1a, 1c, 1.5a, 1.5b and 1.5c)
accounted for 2.5 percent (128,372 acres) of the LRA. Medium
textured soils (SMG's beginning with a 2 or a 3) occupied 47.3
percent (2,380,162 acres). Coarse textured soils occupied
28.1 percent (1,415,036 acres) of the LRA. Organic soils
accounted for an additional 17.6 percent (880,33h acres).

The remaining 4.5 percent (227,629 acres) was alluvial,
gravelly and rocky soils, and non-soil materials.

Well drained soils occurred on 67.0 percent (3,371,927
acres) of the LRA. Somewhat poorly drained soils occupied
7.5 percent (378,326 acres), and the poorly and very poorly
drained soils occupied 25.5 percent (1,282,098 acres) of the
LRA.

32

Table 12.--SMG's, their acreage, and percentage of LRA 93.

 

 

SMG Acreage Percent SEQ Acreage Percent
0a 33,785 0.7 4/10 3,570 0.1
Ob 25,447 0.5 4/2a 11,347 0.2
Is 691 tr. 4/2b 8,833 0.2
10 4,590 0.1 4/2b-s 2,138 0.1
1.5a 59,996 1.2 4/2c 4,155 0.1
1.5b 238 tr. 5a 324,928 6.5‘
105C 3,625 001 53-11 1+,605 001
2.5a 277,710 5.5 5b 48,415 1.0
2.5a-a 32,692 0.6 5b-h 10,349 0.2
2.5a-s 26,718 0.5 So 57,150 1.1
2.5b 118,000 2.3 5c-a 15,054 0.3
2.5b-s 5,751 0.1 5/2a - 47 tr.
2.5c 91.695 1.8 5/20 3,688 0.1
2.5c-s 3,755 0.1 5.3a 286,245 5.7
3a 172,196 3.4 5.7a 92,265 1.8
3a-a 1,195,600 3.7 L-2a 6,059 0.1
3b 46,990 0.9 L-2c 42,024 0.8
3b-a 68,710 1.4 L-ha 6&2 tr.
3c 58,837 1.2 L-4c 27,938 0.6
3/1a 2 0 tr. L-Mc 9,896 0.2
3/2a 4,3 7 0.1 Mc 568,075 1.3
3/2b 922 tr. Mc-a 9 .782 1.9
3/5a 6,305 0.1 M/lc .920 0.1
3/5a-a' 72.997 1.5 M/3c 117.416 2.3
3//b 5,923 0.1 m/4c 100,141 2.0
3 Ra 183,608 3.7 Ga 33,907 0.7
3/Rbc 7,176 0.1 G/Ra 35,166 0.7
4a 236,031 4.7 Ra 31, 77 0.6
4a-a 2 2,005 4.8 Rbc 37. 38 0.7
40 29.352 0.6 Misc. 3,182 9&1
4c 34,431 0.7 T0TAL:5,035,533 100.0

tr. = trace - less than 0.1

34

Two-thirds of the LRA (66.5 percent) had lepes from
O to 6 percent. Slopes from 6 to 18 percent accounted
for 29.5 percent of the LRA, and 3.9 percent was slopes
greater than 18 percent.

Potentially prime farmland accounted for 14.9 percent
of the total LRA. Potentially good farmland accounted for
an additional 61.6 percent. No unique farmland occurred in
LRA 93.

About one-third (34.2 percent) of the lands in this
LRA were soils with acid subsoils. These were soils formed
from the acid parent materials found almost exclusively in
the western Upper Peninsula.

Land Use

The dominant land use in LRA 93 was forestry, Table 1.
It occurred on 90.2 percent of the land. Row crops accounted
for 0.5 percent, small grains and sod crops 2.3, idle 1.3 and
fruit craps trace percentages, reSpectively. Total cr0p1and
and pasture land accounted for 6.4 and 1.6 percent, res-
pectively. The remaining 1.8 percent was other uses. -

Soils and Land Use

Appendix B lists the acreage of each of the major land
uses in each of the SMU's in LRA 93.
Six SMG's are discussed below. These are 2.5a, 3a-a,

4a, 5a, 5.3a and Mo.

35

Table 13 breaks down SMG 2.5a by SMU and land use.

Notice the declining percentage of cropland with increasing
slope. Cropland accounted for 36.3 percent of the gently
sloping lands, 26.2 percent of the moderately sloping lands
and only 10.0 percent of the lands with slopes in excess

of 18 percent. Each of the uses within cr0p1and follow the
same pattern of decreasing percentages with increasing slopes.

Pasture land increased between the gentle and the
moderate slopes and was constant on the moderate and steeper
slopes.

Forest land increased in percentage as slope increased.
It was 57.6 percent of the gentle slopes, 64.4 percent of
the moderate slopes and 80.2 percent of the steeper slopes.
Other lands consistently occupied about 3.5 percent of each
of the slope groups.

Table 14 breaks down SMG 3a-a in a similar manner.
Cropland and it's component uses decreased with increasing
slope as was the case on the 2.5a soils. The actual
percentage of these acid soils used for cropland was signific-
antly less than that of the somewhat finer textured 2.5a soils.
The 3a-a soils had no more than 7.2 percent of a slope group
in cropland, while the 2.5a soils had as much as 36.3 percent
in cropland uses.

Pasture land was slightly more important as a use on
the moderate and steeper slopes than on the gentle slopes.

It occupied about 3 percent of the moderate and steeper

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

H.poH 0 .ma . .o H mno.um o.ooH c. an o.ooH nom.o5m .H45o5
H N mmmummwnw mam moN N.H mmnqwmn flaw: H guano
H.H5 no5 moo H «.mm 5NN.Nn o.nm www.mam c.5N H5N.5om amouom
N.N 5nnan N. mac. H 5.N NN .5H e.H am5.5 «gunman
w“: «55 an n.H we: n.N was .nH N.5 ewo.oa ccaHnouo HH<
m o o . o.c o o.o o.o eHsum
..H non.5H 5.o HNN N.H mmN. 5 5.H MNN.5 oHeH
n.H nmn.mH 5.o :NN . 5.o HHH. .: o.N NHN. HH macho com
5.H 05m.5H o.o o a.o 5HH.N H.n Hm5. 5H ucHuuu Hanan
N.o 580 N o.o o o.o 2.0 58°. N cacao com
owuumwe m. mummmm< M o onoj M .wwmmm04 ommlllla

32.3 ...m 9.0 m3. 3

 

.nm «ma ca damn cam ca commode «moan no ewdpnoouon and moms usdnuu.¢H manna

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

m.mm. 5mm.m5 o.oo mun.o5m .q<aoa
o film :8 .355
M. num.Ho v.5n omH. mm amouom
. Han.n m.~ «5. a onspmum
N.oN n5o.nN n.8n m5. He oeanouo HH<
o o o o pHsum
5.n N38 5.n 85.5 33
m.» 5H.c N.HH NHH.5H macho com
o.nH 35H.nH 5.eH 5n .NN unHauu Hanan
o.~ mnH.~ 5.N 3H .: mnouo tom
Emu-h: Emma”: :5
n+o n+4 nouuaao cam

.nm 4mg ca dn.~ van :« commode anode no omuvsoouea use mom: usdnuu.nH canoe

37
slopes and only about 1.5 percent of the gentle slopes.

Forest land increased in percentage as slope in-
creased from 89.0 percent of the gentle slopes to 93.0
percent of the moderate slopes and 94.5 percent of the
steeper slopes.

Soils in the 4a and 4a-a SMG's each accounted for
nearly 5 percent of the total LRA, Table 15 and Table 16.
There was a greater percentage of the 4a soils devoted to
most of the cropland uses than the 4a-a soils. Forest and
other uses were as a result, in greater percentages on the
4a-a soils.7 The 4a-a soils were used very similarily to the
3a-a soils (Table 14). There were 221 acres of small grains
and 475 acres of idle cropland on eroded gentle slopes in
SMG 4a that do not appear in Table 15.

Table 17 and Table 18 illustrate the use-slope relation-
ships for SMG's 5a and 5.3a, respectively. Greater percentages
of SMG 5a were used for cropland than were SMG 5.3a, but no
cropland uses exceeded 4 percent of a given slope group.
Forest land accounted for 89 percent or more on each slope
group in both of the SMG's and increased in percentage with
increasing slope.

The deep organic soils (SMG.Mc), Table 19, had an
even lesser percentage of non-forested uses. Cropland, pasture
and other uses were insignificant, accounting for only 2.3
percent of the total lands in SMG Mo.

38

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5. 55H M55.N5N 5.55H 555.mH n.55H N55.55 5.5 H 55 .5 .55555
54M- N 5.5: 5 H H 55 5 55m.;55 55555
N.55 5HN.5HN 5.55 555. 5H 5.N5 555.55 5.55 HN5. NH 555555
H.H 555.N 5.N 5H5 5.5 5H5 5.H 555.H 5555555
5.5 555.5H 5.5 555 5.5 555.5 N.5 55N.5H 55555555 HH<
5.5 5 5.5 5 5.5 5 5.5 5 5H555
5.5 M55.H 5.5 5 5.H 5N5.H 5.5 555 5555
5.H N .N 5.5 H55 5.5 N55 H.H 5N5.H 55555 555
N.5 55 .5 5.H 55N 5.N 55N.N 5.5 5HN.5 555555 55555
5.H 5N5.5 5.5 5 5.H H55 5.N N55.N 55555 355
M Ma o...5..o__.r< M mummy-o. 4: . M ommoluo..< . Mu ommloulo< on:
.2555. +5 5+5 3 15525 555

.mm 53 5 .5125 can 5 uouuuao one: no 593.500qu 5:.» com: 5.5.3:.3 0.3.5.5

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5. 55H 55. N 5. 5H mmw.mN 5.55H H5.55 5.55 5 5.5 H .55555
5.H 55 mam. 555 «am: mmmnnu mam: 5N N 55555
5.55 5H5. N5N 5.H5 555.5H 5.55 5HN.55 H.N5 NH5.55 555555
5.N N55. 5 5.N N55 5.H 555.H 5.N 5NN.5 5555555
5.5H 55N.5N H.5 M55 w.w “H5.5 ”.mH “55.5H . 5:5H555mHmwM
5.5 5 5.5 . .
5.5 555.5 5.N N55 H.5 5NH.5 5.N NN5.5 5H55
5.N 55H.5 5.5 5 5.H 5N5.H H.5 555.5 55555 555
N.5 555.5 5.H HNN 5.N N55.N 5.5 555.5 55H555 H5555
.H 5H5.5 5.5 5 5.5 5H5 5.N H55.N 55555 :55
H Hm «IMF: N unwed-5:4 N madame. < M mummmlnlnllllonlllll
555.55 +5 5+5 115.55.55.5me

.nm 45 5 .25 can 55.5 commode anode no 53:50.52” as. com: 55911.3 53.5.5

39

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

. 5H 5 . .
WNM. MWMdmmWI bdbe nmbhh . .

. mam wfim 0.00." a 5 N 0 «+3 0 H E1mm 5A4
N.5 5H5 5.5 55 H 5.55 555.N NNH 555
5.5 5.... ... w 5.. ... .. Mum. ...... .nnmwm

. . mom
5.5 55H H ”.5 5 5.“ ”55.5 H.5 555.5 555 55555555
«.0 OMN 0.0 O #50 #00 6.0 O H 0&0 HH<
N.5 555. .5 5 5.5 5.5 HNN 5H555
5.H 5 5 5 . 5 5.5 5H55

555.5 5.5 5 H 5 55N . 55N 55555 5
U55... 5 555.55 ... ...... 3 .55.... ...... swam
A4505 +m 4 wmmmmmd. o .N 55050 30m
.nm 9+0 m4 o 04 momlmwmbmmlll
4mg :5 dn.m 52m :5 sound 5 Ho cam
50 anode no owe
psoonon can mean 5:5911.oa 55955
.ooH N5. 5 .
m.H .quqwll mquH mmmhmm 5.55 nw5.5mm .
55 555.5 5.5 55 5H 5.N5 5N5.55 5 N H5 .N 5 555
5. 5 555.5H 5.5 5 H.H N55.H H 5.55 H5N. 5NH 55555
one o 0.5 555 5.5 555.5 5H5 5N5 owsmmum
m c m5o.n n.n o 0.0 o o m «on. 55 5255505 A
5.H 5NN.5 5.5 w 5.5 555 “um M5mm5 555555www
owl . do H :Hm . H o o H Oman.“

-m A4505 0504 M flmmumm4 mmmumm4 n N men. n mmwuwawum
...m Flame r4Mmono4 om

mummmdmbummdl

.55 4mg :5 dm o
5m :5 nonuado anode
Ho ewdvcoouon use mom:
555911.55 canoe

1+0

«.5 25:9 muoancouup u .59

0500.“ m .h ..HSHOB
.mmmdmmm nonpo

x5}:
«E.
g
11

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

55 5 5 5
5.55 555.555 5.55H 5N5 5.55 H .555 555555
5.5 555.N 5.5 5 5.5 5 5.N 5555555
5.5 H55.H 5.5 5 5.5 H55.H 55555555 5H5
5.5 5 5.5 5 5.5 5 55:55
5.5 5 5.5 5 5.5 5 5555
5.5 5H5.H 5.5 5 5.5 5H5.H 55555 555
.55 55N 5.5 5 .55 55N 55H555 55525
5.5 5 5.5 5 5.5 5 55555 :55
o 54 M «mmumm4 M :«mmumm4 on:
54555 +5 5+4 5.55555 «555m

.nm 4mg :5 o: usm.:« nonuddo cacao no owdvcconon and non: unannu.mu 55955

#1

Potential Future Uses

About 90 percent of LRA 93 was forested in 1967 even
though 15 percent of the area was potentially prime farm-
land and 61 percent was potentially good farmland. Thus
three-quarters of the LRA was potentially good farmland or
better. Table 20 and Table 21 show how the potentially prime
and potentially good farmland, respectively, was used. Note
that only 16.3 percent of the potentially prime and only
5.3 percent of the potentially good farmlands were actually
used for cropland uses. The potentially prime farmland in
this area was more intensively used than that in LRA 92
(6.1 percent from Table 10), but was still significantly
under utilized relative to agricultural uses. Potentially
good farmland was similarly under used. As local and
global demand for agricultural products increases large
areas of land in LRA 93 could be shifted from forest uses
to agricultural production.

42

Table 20.--Use of potentially prime farmland in LRA 93.

 

 

g§g_ Agggggc Percent
Row Crops 5.909 0.8
Small Grains h7.15h 6.3
Sod Crops 50,215 6.7
Idle 19.014 2.5
Fruit 210 tr.
All Cropland 122,502 16.3
Pasture 17.870 2.h
Forest 600.288 79.7
Other ;§‘;g§ 1‘6
TOTAL: 752.806 100.0

tr. = trace - less than 0.1

Table 21.-~Use of potentially good farmland in LRA 93.

 

 

Egg Acreage Percent
Row Crops 11.833 o.a
Small Grains 6h.b16 2.1
Sod Crops 50,635 1.6
Idle 38.633 1.2
Fruit 0 0.0
All Cropland 165.517 1 5.3
Pasture 5#,113 1.7
Forest 2,827.2?“ 91.2
Other 524.2% m

TOTAL! 310990620 9909

LRA 94N, the northern portion of the Northern Michigan
Sandy Drift, is located in the eastern third of the Upper
Peninsula (Figure 1). The total inventory acreage was
2,783,869 acres. This was 9.0 percent of the state's inven-
tory acreage.

This LRA is characterized by broad flat sandy plains
and large areas of organic soils. More than 90 percent of
this LRA was forested in 1967.

gala

Table 22 lists the acreage of each of the SMG's that
occurred in the LRA and its percentage of the LRA. Fine
textured soils (SMG's 0a, 0b, 0c, 1a, 1b, 1c, 1.5a and 1.5b)
accounted for 8.1 percent (225,469 acres) of the LRA. Medium
textured soils (SMG's beginning with a 2 or a 3) occupied
9.4 percent (261,514 acres) of the LRA, coarse textured
soils (SMG's beginning with a 4 or a 5) occupied 49.4 per-
cent (1.375,552 acres), and organic soils occupied 24.5 per-
cent (680,985 acres). The remaining 8.6 percent (240,350
acres) was occupied by alluvial. gravelly or rocky soils
and non-soil material.

Well drained soils occurred on 46.2 percent (1,286,553
acres) of the LRA. Somewhat poorly drained soils occupied

13.0 percent (362,644 acres), the poorly and very poorly

43

Table 22.--SMG's, their acreage, and percentage of LRA 94N.

SMG Acgeage
0a 42,280
Oh 100,387
0c 8,594
la 2,026
1b 2,010
1c 60,569
1.5a 6,843
1.5b 2,760
2.5a 11,228
2'5a'3 190792
Z-Sb 3.780
2.5b-S 32,362
2.5c 4,835
2.5c-c 630
2.5c-s 17,802
3a 59.486
Ba'a 279578
3b-a 7.738
30 671
3/1a 1.854
3/1b 4,866
3/1c 35.182
3/Ra 33.710
4a 123,745
i; 8:3“3

1a 2, 9
m 8,321
4/1c 4,402

tr. = trace - less than 0.1

Percent

 

OCDCHDC>¢WAFMO(DdWDF‘NMDdWDFMOCDO(DCHVCDOWDQHA
IVMOHWDUxFTObnvk‘O\ACDHThO{UhJHWJCW‘NHVF‘HKJOWA

 

SMG .AAQEggge
4/2a 8,532
4/2b 1,115
4/20 9,115
4/Ra 1,978
53 589.809
5a-h 123,647
5b 145,626
5b-h 38,013
50 38,081
SC’a 105.705
5/2a 21o
5/2b 2,781
5.3a 150,694
L'ZC #0555
L-4a 1,340
L-4c 25,563
L-Mo 20.955
Mc 321,920
Mc-a 174,804
M/ic 1,126
M/lc-a 13,516
M/3c 10,654
M/4c 158,270
M/mc 695
Ga 21,211
Gbc 59.759
Ra 58,041
Rbc 16,522
Misc. 32,404

"d
m
'1
0
m
:3
d-

 

TOTAL:2,783,893

U

OH... '1.

O H O O 0

0.0.1.. o I. no...
IOOV“F‘GM \JFKR'\wChONDO NLPF‘OCDanhJCWOFWJ-\J

P‘OTONHDdeCDOc+OV4CDH$;CflACDdWJF‘HNn¢W‘CHDctO

H
0'
0’
h)

45

drained soils occupied 39.6 percent (1,102,268 acres), and
non-soil material occupied the remaining 1.2 percent
(32,404 acres).

Slopes were fairly flat with 78.2 percent of the LRA
having less than 6 percent SlOpeS. Slapes from 6 to 18
percent accounted for 17.1 percent of the LRA and the other
4.7 percent of the LRA had lepes in excess of 18 percent.

Potentially prime farmland accounted for 8.0 percent
of the LRA. Potentially good farmland accounted for an
additional 40.0 percent. No unique farmland occurred in
this LRA.

Land Use

The dominant land use in LRA 94N was forestry, Table 1.
It occurred on 91.3 percent of the land. Cropland and pas-
ture accounted for 6.5 percent and 0.8 percent, reapectively.
The remaining 1.3 percent was other uses.

Soils and Land Use

Appendix 0 lists the acreage of each of the major land
uses in each of the SMU's in LRA 94N. Six SMG's contained
at least 5 percent each of the LRA. These were 5a, 5b, 5.3a,
Mo, Mc-a and M/4c. Also discussed are SMG's 0a, 0b, 1c, 3a
and 4a. These are either compared with similar SMG's in
LRA 92 or used to illustrate land use changes in a tapo- or

a lithosequence.

46

Tables 23, 24 and 25 break down SMG's 0a, 0b and
1c, respectively, by slope classes and land uses. These
soils form an approximate toposequence with the 1c soils
being slightly coarser.

Note that on the same slopes (A and B) the percentage
of cr0p1and is 55 to 58 percent of the Ga and 0b soils, and
drops to 42 percent of the 1c soils. Small grains were
most common on the somewhat poorly drained soils (41 per-
cent) and were equally common on the well drained and
poorly drained soils (28 percent). Idle cropland was
least common on the somewhat poorly drained soils (10 per-
cent) and more common on the well drained and poorly drained
soils (13 and 15 percent).

Sod crops and pasture decreased with increasing soil
wetness and forests increased with increasing wetness.

SMG's 0a and 0b were discussed in LRA 92. Note the
much more intensive use of these same SMG's in LRA 94N than
in LRA 92. Over half of the gentle slopes on the Ga soils in
LRA 94N were cropland where the comparable soils in LRA
92 were only 19 percent cropland (Table 5). The difference
was even more pronounced on the 0b soils. Fifty-eight percent
of the 0b soils in LRA 94N were used for cropland, whereas
cropland accounted for only 7.9 percent of the 0b soils in
LRA 92 (Table 6).

Tables 26, 27, 28 and 29 break down SMG's 3a, 4a, 5a

and 5.3a, respectively, a partial lithosequence, by slope classes

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Mndn omnuén anchom
«.mw mo .s oaspmam
0.0 we mm usuamoao ”“4
N3: mafia.“ 9M3.”
:.5 nan.s anon
.os nea.o u now
w.. o . ...umw.w.uum
Andaman ammummd on:
.zaa dug cw no cam no omavneouom use new: undenn.:m canes
7
he.
.ooa ~.~ . . . .
T T. .I T 2 E .... m... ......
o..s «mo.sfi o.oa omo.s c.sa a m. . a . Hosea
w.sa on~.o o.o~ can.“ o.~ mm o o.n~ flaw.» pm.uom
“.mn “5N.wd n.n NMN 5.“ mm. “.6H 0.3 Ohflfimdm
o.o o o.o o o.ofi w « s.mn «me as ecaaaouo HH<
«.a amm.n c.o o o.o c o.o o . vases
n.0H mnn.: 0.0 o 3.0“ s m s.:« 5mm.n oHcH
a... a...» n.n an. «.m N ..N. me .n macho com
o.o o 6.0 o o. aw: m.u~ u a madman Hanan
0 one . o o c o o macho tom
U935“. A [amused roamoun: N 3 .0m
...N n+0 n+4 mommUHo cam

.z:m «an :u do can nu commune anode no andvcoohon use new: unequu.n~ canoe

 

 

 

 

m.mm .am o.ooH mnu.m o.ooH mmu.mm o.oo« «.5n

a.“ mam.“ o o o mam: «an. maul mm

a.nm www.mm o.ooa oa:.n :.~m we. .ua 6.3m new .mn

u.o a o.o o o.o o N.“ m

«.m mm .« o.o o o.o o o.n mm

o.o o o.o c o.o o o.o o

a.” mad.a o.o c o.o o o.m was.“

s.o cam o.o o o.o o o.o cam

o.o o o.o o c.o o o.o c

o.o o o.o o o.c o o.o o

Hmnnnnuummumm< m ammmmm< mu. ommmmwe m. (mummmma
n<aoa +m n+0 n+4

 

 

.44909

guano
pmouom
ousvmam
ccuaeono HH<
pfisum

oHcH

amouo com
magnum Hamsm
@9090 Box

 

 

om:

mmmwmwm:mmMflm

.zaa 4mg :w an mam ca nomumdo cacao no ewdpcoonon one son: ccmanu.w~ oases

as

\O‘E

.3

in
q-o

«a:

OgHNONON

OBm‘OOv-Ia’m
cocoa...

.Adaoa

henna
pmonoh
ouspmam
oceanouo HH<
swank

oHoH

nnono com
unaduo Hausm
macho tom

 

 

Mdflflfimm

4

mm:

.zam 4mg an ow cam no owdvsooaon and moms ocaAna.m~ oases

49

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

o.o n.an mmm.m .g4aoa
m.om mmw o o o gonna
o.on mum H.mn New «meson
o.o o «.mH NHN ouspuom
o.o o “.m: New useHaouo HH<
o.o o o.o o pHnum
o.o o o.nH mum oHcH
o.o o p.0n ano macho com
o.o o o.o .o mcHeuo HHusm
o.o c o.o o macho 30m
HmW smacked TM! ammono< om:
+m cououo n+0 mommwao mmoam
o.moH www.mmm p.omH numb» m.onm mmmnmu p.omm m~5.om .H<aoa
H H o o o o s- a N no H uoapo
s.ma s~m.~m o.ooH mac.“ «.om mna.ss w.mo www.mn . «match
”.0 am o.o o o.o o n.o «Hm ouspuum
.mH «o .H~ o.o o n.n omm.H m.Hn omn.aH usaHnouo HH<
W... m... . M m.” x. .. a“...
. a o o.o o .H so . o
a.~H mos.aH o.o o N.H Hom o.H~ oa~.mH «mono com
o.o o o.o o o.o o s.o as: mnHuno HHesm
o.o o o.o o o.o o o.o o «mono :om
.IM ammono< M oMfleho< )ml oumohod N mumMMo< om:
H<soa +m . n+o m< nomuaHo mmon

.zam dad :a a: cam cu commode onoau ho owdvsoouom and moms unequu.b~ oases

50

 

o h D O F Q 0 .
bqbbh mumlmm qubH IMMIM» qubH MMWIbm

Adaoa

heave
vmouom
oaspmmm
ecanouo HH<
awash

eHcH

macho com
usaauo HHaEm
macho 3oz

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

o o o o o o o a H

o.ma oeH.maH o.ooH mam.o~ s.am sm:.no m.um mas.mm
o.o o o.o o o.o o o.o o
m.o nmm o.o o n.o on H.H new
c.o o o.o o o.o o o.o o
n.o an: o.o o m.o on N.o mum
«.0 cm: o.o o o.o o .o om:
o.o o o.o o 6.6 o o.o o
o.o o o.o o o.o o o.o o
N ommmmm¢ mmmmum< M mmmmmmfl M ommmmw<

H<sos +m n+o m4

 

on:

mommmdm.mmomm

.zam 4mg ca an.m cam ca commode emcee Ho omdvsoouom one new: usaqun.m~ manna

.Adaoa

guano
pmohoh
onsvmdm
unannouo HH<
vashm

oHcH

macho com
undone Hanan
unoho :om

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

n.ppH www.mmm n.nnH mom.om m.ooH . a o.o H nmo.m~n

o o o o o m o mmo.«_m o o N

c.5a «Hm. an c.ooH mom.om ~.mm No.sH« m.om -~.mon

n.o mm5.H o.o o v.0 Hmn.H H.o on:

n.H Hnm.s o.o o a.o new H.~ mmo.o

o.o on .n m.w w u.” mew m.w mHo.~

00° W 3 e e o

e.o mso.s o.o o o.o o n.H mso.:

o.o o o.o o o.o o o.o o

o.o o o.c o o.c o o.o o

g M g M ammo. .H.o._ 4. M ciao <
H<soa +m . owe m4

 

 

on
lmummmmmbummdm

.zam 4mg :H on cam :« commode anode no omdvseouon use no»: oceans.m~ canes

51

and land uses. With the exception of SMG 4a, as the soil
profile became coarser, the percentage of cropland decreased
and the percentage of forest land increased. 0n the
coarsest soils (SMG's 5a and 5.3a) forests made up no
less than 96.9 percent of any slope group. Forest land
tended to increase in percentage as slope increased within
each of these SMG's.

SMG 4a was used more intensively than the 3a soils
or the coarser 5a and 5.3a soils. Cropland accounted for
18.7 percent of SMG 4a. Sod crops and idle cropland ac-
counted for almost all of that (18.3 percent).

Table 30 presents the land use of SMG 5b. Note that
99.2 percent was forested. Comparing this with the well
drained, similarily textured 5a soils (Table 28), a higher
percentage of the wetter 5b soils were forested (99.2 per-
cent versus 96.9 percent on similar slopes in 5a soils).

The organic soils in LRA 94N were also almost ex-
clusively forested. Tables 31, 32 and 33 show land uses
for SMG Mo, Mc-a and M/4c, respectively. Over 99 percent
of each of these three groups were forested, with no
significant difference between the way they were used.

Potential Future Uses

Over 90 percent of LRA 94N was forested even though

8 percent was potentially prime farmland and 40 percent
was potentially good farmland. Thus about half of the
land in LRA 94N was potentially good farmland or better.

52

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

o.opH m a. n o.onH mus o.opH mau.H~n .Heaoa
m o mmmqun o o o m o H a N sogpo
«.mm was.mHn o.ooH 533 «.mm Hoo.mHn pmoaom
o.o o o.o a o.o o assumed
o.o o o.o o o.o o ccaHaouo HH<
o.o o o.o o o.o o pHsum
o.o o o.o o o.o o oHcH
o.o o o.o o c.o o agoao com
o.o o o.o o .o.o o mnHaso HHusm
o.o o o.o c o.o o _ macho 30m
[mmmumm4 M ammummm MM . 1mmmmmm¢ on:
H<aoa n+0 n+4 woumaHo «mon

.zam 4mg :H o: c:m_:« ueuuuao anode no endvseouom use new: osoqnu.Hn oases

 

 

 

mhmpw mmmnmum .H<aoa

o «no sense
«.mm hos.s:H vacuum
o.o o ohsvudm
n.c an: ucuHaouo HH<
0.0 o pflshm
o.o c oHuH
n.o an: nacho com
o.o o usHauu Hanan
o.o a macho to:

mmmmmwm ummmmmq on:

.zam «ma SH Am 02% Ho andvfloohon end mom: ccdflll.on canda

53
Table 32.--Land uses and percentage of SMG Mc-a in LRA 94N.

 

figs Acreage Percent
Row CrOps O 0.0
Small Grains 0 0.0
Sod CrOps O 0.0
Idle 0 0.0
Fruit 0 0.0
All Cr0pland 0 0.0
Pasture 0 0.0
Forest 173,918 99.5
Other §§§ Q;5
TOTAL: 174,804 100.0

Table 33.--Land uses and percentage of SMG M/4c in LRA 94N.

 

Egg? Acreage Percent
Row CrOps 0 0.0
Small Grains 0 0.0
Sod CrOps 0 0.0
Idle 450 0-3
Fruit 0 0.0
All CrOpland 450 0.3
Pasture 0 0.0
Forest 157,384 99.4
Other 436, 943

TOTAL: 158,270 100.0

54

Tables 34 and 35 indicate the use of the potentially prime
and potentially good farmland, respectively. Note that 18.8
percent of the potentially prime and only 10.5 percent of the
potentially good farmlands were actually used as cropland.
This indicates an under utilization relative to agricultural
production. As local and global demands for food and forage
products increase, a large acreage in LRA 94N could be

shifted from forest uses to agricultural production.

55
Table 34.-éUse’of potentially prime farmland in LRA 94N.

 

 

Eggfi Acreage Percent
Row Crops O 0.0
Small Grains 17,925 8.1
Sod Crops 12,006 5.4
Idle 11,824 5.3
Fruit 0 0.0
All Crepland 41.755 18.8
Pasture 2,581 1.2
Forest 173.584 78.0
Other .5695 24;
TOTAL: 222,534 100.1

Table 35.--Use of potentially good farmland in LRA 94N.

 

 

§§e_. Agggage Percent
Row Crops 224 tr.
Small Grains 52,847 4.8
Sod Crops 29.719 2.7
Idle 33.533 3-0
Fruit 0 0.0
All Cropland 116,323 10.5
Pasture 13,180 1.2
Forest 966,400 86.9
Other 16,448 ‘;,5
TOTAL: 1,112,351 100.1

tr. = trace - less than 0.1

LRA 24s

LRA 943, the southern portion of the Northern Michigan
Sandy Drift, occupies the eastern two thirds of the northern
half of the Lower Peninsula. The total inventory acreage
was 7.551.075 acres, or 24.3 percent of the state inven-
tory.

This LRA is charcterized by broad, flat, sandy plains
and large area of organic soils. Forestry was the dominant
land use in 1967 accounting for over 70 percent of the LRA's
land use.

Soils

Each of the SMG's that occurred in LRA 94S and its
percentage of the LRA are listed in Table 36. Fine tex-
tured soils (SMG Oa, Ob, Oc, 1a,1b, 1c, 1.5a, 1.5b and 1.50)
accounted for 9.6 percent (728,344 acres), medium textured
soils (SMG's beginning with a 2 or a 3) accounted for 10.9
percent (826,730 acres), and coarse textured soils accounted
for 67.0 percent (5,060,791 acres) of the LRA. Organic
soils occurred on 8.7 percent (658,920 acres) of the LRA
and alluvial, gravelly and rocky soils occurred on 2.8
percent (212,271 acres). The remaining 0.8 percent (64,019
acres) was non-soil material and unidentified acreage.

Well drained soils occurred on 70.2 percent (5,301,733

acres) of the LRA. Somewhat poorly drained soils occupied

56

57

Table 36.--SMG's, their acreage, and percentage of LRA 94S.

 

SMG Acreage. Percent
0a 432 tr.
Ob 4,4 8 0.1
Go 26,739 0.4
1a 74,274 1.0
lb 89,680 1.2
10 9,248 0.1
1.5a 359,400 4.8
1.5b 110,673 1.5
1.50 53,450 0.7
2.5a 188.779 2.5
2.5a-S 10.327 001
2.5b 26,378 0.3
2.5b-s 20,068 0.3
2.5b-cs 216 tr.
2.50 54,387 0.7
2.5c-c 3,044 tr.
2.50-8 9,178 001
3a 351.827 4.?
3a-a 6 tr.
3b 10,095 0.1
3b-s 5,057 0.1
30 5,626 0.1
3c-s 7,441 0.1
3/1a 1,899 tr.
3/1b 19579 tr

0.

0

0
3/20 5,008 0
3/5a 35.959 0
3/ -a 1.699 t
3 Sb 3.889 0
3/Ra 14,496 0
a 853.733 1
4a-a 11,792 0
4b 32,388 0

tr. = trace - less than 0.1

o o o 0 OH.

H

 

SMG Acreage Percent
40 65,432 0.9
4/1a 8,176 0.1
4/lb 17,231 0.2
4/10 ‘ 8,238 0.1
4/2a 133,084 1.8
4/2b 143,246 1.9
4/2b-s 4, 40 0.1
4/20 40, 68 0.5
4/Ra 209 tr.
5a 1,372,177 18.2
5a-h 3,131 tr.
58.-m 6,325 001
5b 142,636 1.9
5b-h 9 ,050 1.2
50 232,532 3.1
5c-a 75,611 1.0
5/2a 81,674 1.1
5/2b 44,409 0.6
5.3a 1,158,602 15.3
5.7a 520,107 6.9
L-Zc 68,500 0.9
L-4a 862 tr.
L-4c 8,794 0.1
L-Mc 43,524 0.6
Mc 410,934 5.4
Mc-a 76,576 1.0
M/lc 8,419 0.1
M520 42,716 0.6
M 0 117,827 1.6
m/mc 2,448 0.1
Ga 34,963 0.5
Gbc 400 tr.
Ra 42,706 0.6
Rbc 12,522 0.2
Misc. 64,012 Q58
TOTAL:7,551,075 100.2

58

10.1 percent (763,258 acres), poorly and very poorly drained
soils occupied 18.8 percent (1,422,065 acres), and the mis-

cellaneous lands occupied the remaining 0.8 percent (64,019

acres) of the LRA.

SlOpes were mostly gentle with 70.2 percent (5,305,647
acres) of the LRA occurring on the gentle slopes (up to 6
percent). Moderately sloping land (6 to 12 percent slopes)
occupied 22.8 percent (1,719,695 acres) of the LRA and the
remaining 7.0 percent (525,732 acres) was occupied by steeply
sloping lands.

Potentially prime farmland accounted for 14.8 percent
(1,116,191 acres) of the LRA. Potentially good farmland
occupied an additional 35.3 percent (2,668,372 acres). No
unique farmland occurred in this LRA.

Land Use

The dominant land use in LRA 94S was forestry, Table 1.
It occurred on 71.3 percent of the land. Row cr0ps accounted
for 2.7 percent, small grains 2.8 percent, sod cr0ps 8.4
percent, idle 5.6 percent, and fruit craps accounted for 0.3
percent of the LRA. Cropland and pasture accounted for 19.8
and 5.7 percent, respectively. The remaining 3.2 percent
was other uses.

Soils and Land Use

Appendix D lists the acreage of each of the major land

uses in each of the SMU's in LRA 94S. Five SMG's each made

59

up at least 5 percent of the LRA. These are 4a, 5a, 5.3a,
5.7a and M0. Additionally, SMG's 1a, 1b, 1.5a, 1.50, 2.5a,
3a, 4/2a, 4/2b, 5b, and 50 are discussed.

Table 37 and Table 38 break down SMG 1a and 1b, res-
pectively, a taposequence. On similar slopes. row 0r0ps
were in about the same percentage in both SMG's. Small
grains and idle cr0p1and were both significantly more abun-
dant on the well drained soils. Sod crops and forests were
more abundant on the somewhat poorly drained soils. In SMG
1a. there were 198 acres of small grains on eroded C and D
slopes not presented in table 37.

Table 39 and Table 40 present land uses on a slightly
coarser t0posequence, 1.5a and 1.5b, respectively. On similar
slopes there was very little difference in the way the two
groups were used. In the 1.5a soils as lepe increased cr0p-
1and uses tended to decrease, except on the eroded slopes.

Table 37, Table 39, Table 41, Table 42, Table 43, Table
46, Table 49 and Table 50 present a lithosequence for SMG's
13. 1.5a, 2.53. 3a, 4a, 53. 5.33 and 5.7a respectively.-

This sequence covers all but the finest textured well drained
soils. As a general rule, as texture got coarser cropland
and its component uses declined. Forests increased in per-
centage as texture got coarser, starting at 21.7 percent of
the la soils and accounting for 95.7 percent of the sandiest
5.7a soils. Generally, increasing slope had the same effect

as increasing sand content. As slopes increased forests

6O

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

m.ooH www.mm o.ooH mmm m poH nmm.mm .Hsaoa

H we H o o o H 80H umspo

s.ms smo.os o.ooH one m.ss H .mn pmonom

m.a nnm.m o.o o o.oH m m.m oneness

«.ms m .mn o.o o n.ns Nss.on eceHnono HH<

«.o a H o.o o «.0 smH pHaum

H.n oss.~ o.o o H.n oss. N oHcH

s.c~ am~.mH o.o o o.o~ mom. .mH cacao com

o.~H swu.oH o.o o H.~H son. oH mcHsuu HHusm

N.5 ass.o o.c o n.s asso w .0000 son

emmmwm< ;M mummmm4
Asses n+0

.msm 4mg cu pH cam :« moomdao enoam no owdvsoouen 000 men: osoqnu.mn canoe
o.ooH usm.us oH Mum.“ m.moH mpm.m . H www.mm .H<aos
o.m= moH u m.? cm o o o m m o H nospo
5.Hm omo.oH m. mm a~.H e.on mmm.~ o.sH mHm. HH puauom
m.nH smm.m w. «H oHa o. H sum m.mH smm. m ouspmam
o.~o mso.os o.o o s. n soo.~ «.mo .sms. ms enquouo HH<
H.H ans o.o o o.o o n.H ham pHsnm
o.m nmm.n o.o o w.n nHN o.m ass. m «HeH
n.6H sn~.~H o.o o w.oH omm. m.sH mom. HH cacao com
m.m~ He .HN o.o o o.H~ msu. H H.on sue. ow ucHanu Haasm
“.5 so .m o.c o o.o s.o saw. u cacao sax
nmmnnnnmmmumms1 m“ iwummmmms mi [mummmms m mmmmmms mmunnnun
.292. +m n+0 m+< . koala... .s H. 0. «mo. H_.m

.msm <¢A :4 0H a:m.:a concede anode Ho omdvsoouon and new: usanun.sn oases

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

E. E Paa. mmPa :38
N N ooN. N o . o posse
n.aN aam.N H.a mam scones
nuns amH.s a.aH naonH «Napaam
H.nN aNH N H.wo aNH o ueaHaono HH<
Pa o 28 o . with
N N oON a.aH ans H oHeH
o.a ass H.oN aaN.H «mono com
o.a nso n.aH ans.H msHuuu HHuam
o.a Hso o.nH sHN.H cacao 30m

nmllllmmmemaw .m mmammu< em:
notcho ....” .Uououo Q+o mommdflo ofloam

o u o a o o o a

m mm“ pmw Mmm n mm“ m mp“ “an mm“ m on“ “mm Nwm .nsaoa
.... we...“ 3. gm... ... a3. .... ”...... ans.
0 o o a o g o a .3 m
n.aH aNo.No n.nN Nma.n m.aH Haa.mN H sH one mN «agenda
w.wa on NaH ”.mH was N w.wn “Na He Mums woa.mNH ecuHaouwHwMM
aum Haaan eHN oHs. H.oH aon.NH m.m amn.aH oHeH
N.oN amN.wa m a HaN H N.aN Haa.an H.oN nNa.oa macho com
n.oH sHa.on n.N Nos N.m Nmmua n.nH m .wN ueHunu Hausm
N a oHo an o.c o N.a aNn a n.NH o m.sN nacho sou

H omaeuo< K amazed 'm e on N walrus”: om:
H<soa +m 9+0 .1 n+4 mumwmmw.mmaflw

.msa $3 5 on; 02m 5 uonmuuo 30.3 no emdvsoouon and moms oceanian 33mm.

62

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

n.an mma.nH o.onH mma.am a.aa a.a H .H<aoa
o.o o. . H N ssN.H H N NH N 00:90
0.0 ows.a anon .mn o.sn amouos smooch
a.a oso H H HH 00.0 n.sH aso.aH ousemaa
a.n aNs «HNN Hoa 0H n.as HoH.mm ensHaouo HH<
o.o o a.o NHs. HUN awm.N aHaum
o.o o N.o aao.n H a n .m oHeH
a H nHN n mH saa oH m.aN owe an nacho com
a.H NHN N.n sam.H o.a Nsa.oH mcHeno Hanan
e.o o o.o o s.H amo.H cacao 3am
M .ImmmNMo4 M lummmmmfl M o 090M . on:

+m g+o n+4 aammaso amasm

.msa <¢A.:« un.~ cam ma commode omens no omuPSoouon one new: 000A--.Hs manna

 

.o

E
0

0
0

0‘0
14 N
01:!-

n

03000-3130
.1
N

C . C O 0 O 0 0
OROOOM‘OO
omooomnoo

 

“E

”Nazca-M

O O O O O O O O

MHBGOHH‘AH
‘OHN

v-Iv-GN

1-4

 

 

m.aa a . H
H HH H
N.mN moa.aN
o.NH onn.nH
N.Ho sNa.ao
o.o o
H.a HH.oH
n.aN aH.cn
a.HH aso.nH
c.nH Non.sH
ammouo<
n<aoa

.msa <mq.:d pm.H cam 0H commode anode no amass-ones 0:0 non: csdgun.o¢ canes

HM snmmmmmw
n+0

 

 

no. H .H<aoa
HH H guano
mca.aN nausea
aoa.HN onspmma
NHm.am eeaHaouo HH<
o pHsum
HH.oH oHcH
aH.on «gone now
amN.NH unHauo HHeam
«on.aH macho ton
on:

 

M mummMmM
mtd

.mummmdmlmmmwm

63

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

o.ooH nNo.H o.ooH mumnu H.ooH nnN.H .qeaos
a.a m __ e. NHN e.e o sense
a.oN NHN e. H one a.eH aoN season
m.aa HHm a.os Ham.H e.eH com suspend
e.e e H.Hs aoa.H s.ae sse ecaHaono HHe
e.e o e.e o e.e o pHsua
o.o o e.s NHN a.on nne oHeH
e.e o H.Nn oas.H a.eH aoN macho com
e.e o e.e o e.e o 2:98 396
e.e o e.s aoN e.e o macho som

R «mmwmm< a“ “mmmmmme (R mwmmmmmr .mea

uoUOHG ...m vmfiomm 0+0

o.ooH aNe.Hnn o.ooH NHo.nN o.ooH ana.e H o.OOH n a.onH .qeaoe
N.N mmmqmln nqw|| nnmlln @441: «madam: .04MII nmm4nal sense
s.an ano.NoN e.ea enH.aH H.ne aaa.aoH e.as nae.Ha season
e.e oeo.nN e.e NsN.H e.e oaa.a H.e eeH.a euspeea
n.nn NHa.eHH e.eH aaa.n n.aN anH.es n.ns HNo.ee eceHaono HHe
a.H aH .e o.o o n.N oeH. a.H ane.N pHsna
a.e ea .nN n.n aNe n.n awe. N.e Nen.NH eHeH
o.nH nae.Nn o.HH asa.N o.nH Nea.HN s.aH aeN.eN macho eom
e.s aHN.sH a.o eHN N.N sHa.n e.e aeN.oH ecHene HHesm
H.e een.HN e.e aoN e.s eoa.e e.a ees.sH enouo 30m

\M, onoMo¢ ml onoMo< 1w, ommmmo< My AH mwwwMo< 0mm
[meson em mnw e.e mmmmmdmlmmmam

.msa <mq an an cam an mommaao ononm mo owmpsoosom use new: ccmnus.ms manna

64

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

o.ooH amo.a o.ooH mmo.nN e.eoH mam .geaoe
o.o o nee oN e.e o sense
e.ae NNa.s n.nN eae.n o.ooH aaH season
H.m eHN n.Nm ~nm.a o.o o essvmmm
n.aN Hna.H H. n aHo.a e.e o eceHaouo HHe
e.e o e.e o e.e o pHsua
o.o o e.a eao.N e.e o «Hen
N.HN aas.H N.aH ena.n e.e o macho com
H.e sns m.e osa.H e.e o mcHauo HHNsm
e.e o .s eso.H e.e o macho 30m

R ommwmm< M mmmmmm< M mmwmums em:
mmwommiflm mummmmaq+o venous m0! momma o m
o.ooH nna.n a.aa nN.nHH o.ooH ona.oon a.aa nNN.aH .qeeos
e.s moe.mm N.s mNn.w n.n Nnm.e e.s mHn.ow sense
H.en enn.Hon e.ee nn.Ha n.He HNs.seH N.He een.sHN season
N.a seo.Ne H.e a.e n.n Hao.NN a.n oee.mN assumed
a.an NNn.neN n.n H s.a N.eN Hes.ne e.en oes. nH eceHaoso HHe
s.o one.n e.e o .o Hns.H e.e ass.N pHsna
e.e Hmo.ea a.n mmn.s n.n asm.sN a.oH mea.ms anon
n.nH ena.aHH H.s nHe.s H.mH aH .Ns e.nH sns. e macho com
n.m anN.an N.e eHN n. ae .oH N.e eao.eN mcHeuu HHesm
n. esH.eN N.e NHN H.N eHN.e a.s nae.oN maouo 30m

o mouo< MI, deMHMd M mMNMMMfl .Mw mmmmeql mm:
H ”Hmmmwa +m gnu me mummmsu «mmflm

.msm <mq an a: cam an momnmao onoam Ho swapsoohon and moms 000A--.m: manna

65

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

.ooH N.n . o Nam e.e H .q<aoa
WHMI mwmddwh $H c @qNb nos—Po
e.sn nco.ea e.e o e.sn noo.ea season
e.oH oen sH e.e o H.oH oen.sH ouspmem
o s o o o
x. .... .. 3.. .... a. ...... Zine
s.HH non.eH e.e o N.HH non.eH oHeH
H.NH mnn.aH o.ooH Nam .HH mmm.wH amouo com
.
H.n aHn a e.e o H.n aHn.a ueHaue HHeam
e.e osa.n e.e o N.s osa.n manna 30m
M Numumme . Wm mmmmmmwll m_ ;mmmummel. can
A4909 cocoa. m< m4 neumsno onm

.msa 4mg 0H nw\: osm.:n commune anode no cuspsoouom 0:0 mom: ecmnwu.ms ensue

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

. www.mnH n.noH HHHhm. . H auuhmm . H . a .qeaoa
N o o o mam» Noe gum. .Hofio
H.an ooa.ea s.na nes.s e.an aH.on a.em eea.Ns season
e.e mHe.e e.aH HHN.H H.oH Hao.n H.n NHn.N «gunmen
m.on He.os e.e aHs n.eN nan.sH 7H.sn HNa.nN ecuHaouo HH<
.o NHN e.e o e.e o e.e NH pHaua
H.e e .oH e.e aHs e.e nan.” a.a a .n oHeH
n.nH oHe.oN e.e o m.sH enN. a.aH Nan.nH emcee com
a.N HHe.n e.e o .N HaN.H s.n osn.N eeHeue HHusm
n.n nae.s e.e o a.N Hns.H e.s Nss.n macho sum
“mmnnnnnmmwmmme. mu n+tummumm4W4. in Jummumme, mm :mmmmmme on
H<aoa +m use me mummmmmpummmm

.msa 4mg 0H 0N\s mxm_:« commune anode no owaHSeoqu 000 men: c:09a-.ss eases

66

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

o.ooH aom.oH H.ooH one. n o.ooH an.N .Heeoa
o.o o s.N Hna m o.o o senpo
w.ma mm~.m 5.0: :mm.:H m.eH Nu: vmesom
o.N aoN s.n HeN.H H.e soN «unseen
s.oH nHa.H e.nn sna.aH H.na eoo.H ocoHoooo HHe
o.o o N.N HHe o.o o eHzpa
n.NH NeN.H e.ss aan.eH a.as an.H oHeH
H.e Hne o.s ems.H o.o o macho oom
o.o o e.o eHN N.nN sne ecHopo HHaSm
o.o o N.N sNo o.o o macho 30m
&. mmmmmo< (M :mwmmuo< M xmmmomme, xwms
cocouo +m mmvome q+o iowoueum< mmwmmwu.mmmww
H.ooH aaH.Nan.H o.ooH onH.NaH o.ooH nn .Han o.ooH HN .ena .neeoa
Mann: nwnqomlnu nqmll nwnqwlu new; sN%.m onIi nwm4nnn secpo
H.ea Hoe.nso.H a.Ha aoa.anH s.aa osH.non a. a ano.aen season
e.n oao.o s.n sNo.n n.n Hsn.sH n.n nne.eN opossum
o.aH noH.n N s.n sae.n e.eH eao.se n.eH eao.enH ocoHaouo HHe
N.o aNn.N o.o o N.o nee H.o new pHsua
N.o emH.NHH a.N HHe.s H.a Hne.en o.a naa.Nn oHoH
a.n e n.oe e.o eao.H n.n eon.oN n.n nee.en moouo oom
o.o eHo.a o.o o e.o oea.N a.o eoN.n eeHauo HHosm
H.N snn.aN H.o aoN n.H eno.n H.n aoN.nN moose 30m
(M oMmoMo< w, ammoho< 7M. mmmmmmqw M mumMMo¢ on:
.[qeaoe was, mum me; mummmsuummmww

.msa <mn an an aim an memmmno omoam no owmvcoohon one new: econ--.e: manna

67
Table 47.--Land uses and percentage of SMG 5b in LRA 94S.

 

Use Acreage Percent
Row Cr0ps 1,840 .1.3
Small Grains 1,010 0.7
Sod Cr0ps 820 0.6
Idle 8,829 6.1
Fruit 1,388 1.0
All Cr0pland 13,887 9.7
Pasture 2.765 1-9
Forest 123,367 85.9
Other 3L§LZ 225
TOTAL: 143,636 100.0

Table 48.-—Land uses and percentage of SMG 5c in LRA 94S.

 

gge Acreage Percent
Row Cr0ps 1,407 0.6
Small Grains 1,002 0.4
Sod Cr0ps 4,260 1.8
Idle 2,678 1.2
Fruit 198 0.1
All CrOpland 9.545 4.1
Pasture 9,695 4.2
Forest 210,671 90.6
Other 22622 2;;

TOTAL: 232,532 100.0

E“
3%

....
H
N
H

\O

{N
\n

NM

OOOOHfid-Q
OOOOK‘fiha
OONH‘DN‘ON
. . . . . O . .

00:00.40

 

En
Nms
aNe

nsN.H
aNn.s
Haa
sNa.N
NHe

o

o

 

M mwmmuod

Gaucho +m

M ammohod

 

68

0
0
0

L

$.30».

aNH.nno.H

«0N
Os

HNHONwaq—o:
O O O I O O O I
OOHmOH-rq-c
Ndbddd‘mls.
O O
OOOMOQda

 

M oumoquL
eooouo o+o

+00%

oNn.eHn
o.s
nH.sH
eoN
o .oH
o.s.N
aoN
one

HH<BOB

H0590
Pmouom

ousvmom
oceHoouo HHe
Pasha

oaeH

maouo com
manonc Hausm
macho 30m

 

Lo
0
0
0

E15

NnN. He

N

001
O\

unmasv-clmmo
O O I O O 0 Q 0
OOHNO-a'm

 

omoouo< ouwmuod

F“
#5

cummuo<

9+0

 

.A<aos

guano

vmenom
onspmmm
ocuHaouo HH<
vHsum

oHcH

macho com
undone Haosm
macho 30m

 

 

 

M mmmmmm<
m4

on:

mummmdmlmmmdw
.msa 4mg 0H un.m can an commune onoan no omavsoouon and mom: usunaa.as canes

69

T
a

b-
crocaouaoecnnc>

F\
\O

G!
F‘s-0
GI

63

(DCNO<3C>CH3C>
0.00.000
OI

CHDCDVHDVNOHHC>

E‘

C)
CDONDCDCMO<3€VOE§
H

'0
H

CDCHDCDCMO<DC>
........
‘OCDCHDCDGMDCHD

Ho0 S629 mmOH I OOdhfi I .hP

.ndaoa

Macao
smouom

osspmmm
esmamouo HH<
swash

oHeH

mmono com
unamho Hamsm
enouo 30x

 

N owuoho<

 

E’

aom.omm
eH HH

ona.aas
NH .s
no .e

o

Nna.n

nne

eHN

“I
O\

.FMHCDFVDC~
CLPCDwHDviCHfiGI

‘0
o

 

venous «w

3E?

O\
V‘
O]
o\
O
O\
F.

¢3C>CN°<3C>§JD
00 0‘00 .10.

CHDCDOMDCMOCD

 

m mmmmuo<

L.

ewdouom

ocean. o+o

E

a:
ooo.—:o.-uo:\.-4

a

(DOMDFHDvQCWQ

emmnHa
wso.na
neo.H
o
neo.H
o

o
o

 

emmouom

V‘

PK

o.ooH. a . an

O\
'0
.&
F‘
p.
a)
F\

CLHCQwHDGKhJ\OI

. . . . . I . I

OOOHOHOV‘N
IO

 

cummuo<

 

on: .
mummmmmummmmm

HA<aoa

scape
pneuom
ousvmom
undanono HH<
vHsum

oHeH

smoke com
mcHouw Haasm
macho to:

 

M mmmmmm<

 

A4909

+fl

9+0

m4

 

on:
mummmdm:mmmmw

.msm 4:; an on.“ cam:« commune onodn no emancoouon 600 men: vsdqnn.om canaa

70

became increasingly common and cropland percentages declined.
In SMG 2.5a there were 213 acres of other uses on eroded C
and D slopes that were not included in Table 41.

Table 44 and Table 45 present land use for SMG 4/2a
and 4/2b, respectively. Note that drainage does not signi-
ficantly affect the land use in the well drained and somewhat
poorly drained soils. There is slightly more sod 0r0ps and
less idle cropland in the well drained 4/2a soils than the
4/2b soils. Otherwise they differ very little in land use
on the same slopes.

A more complete drainage sequence is presented in Table
46 (5a), Table 47 (5b) and Table 48 (50). In these sandy
soils, on the same lepes, the well drained soils are the
most intensively used. 0r0pland represented 18.3 percent of
the gently sloped well drained soils, 9.7 percent of the
somewhat poorly drained soils and only 4.1 percent of the
poorly drained soils. These sandy soils were much less in-
tensively used as the loamy and clayey soils. Forests re-
presented at least three-quarters of the use of any of these
soils, and a maximum of only 57 percent of any finer textured soils
presented. In SMG 4/2a there were 426 acres in forest on
eroded C and D $10pes and 648 acres in forest on eroded
E and higher slopes. Neither eroded figure was presented
in Table 44.

The deep organic M0 soils (Table 51) were less inten-

sively used than all but the coarsest textured mineral soils.

71

 

 

 

 

.ndsoa

hospo

pmohoh
osspmum
esdnmouo HH<
wanna

oneH

macho eom
eoHaNo HHeam
mmoho 3oz

 

 

 

.o H mmmofi oofi Em o.ooH £2..on
N HH o o o «aw. HH
a.Ha aea.aan o.ooH eHN a.Ha Hne.aan
a.N naa.HH o.o o a.N naa.HH

n.N Nos.a o.o o n.N Nos.a
o.o o o.o o o.o o
o.H oHa.n o.o o o.H oHa.n
e.o see.N o.o o e.o see.N
n.o eNo.H o.o o n.o oNo.H
s.o ooe.H o.o o s.o ooe.H
PM mflflflMo< N (Immmmmmd My mmmmmm<
oeaoa o+o n+4

.msa «ma :H oz 02m :« commune onoaa no omensoouon use moms econuu.Hm canes

 

on:

uowmmno «moan

72

Total cr0p1and represented only 2.3 percent, and forestry
accounted for 91.9 percent of their use.

Potential Future Uses

Over 70 percent of LRA 94S was forested in 1967 even
though 14.8 percent of the soils were potentially prime
and 35.3 percent were potentially good farmland. Thus about
half of the LRA was potentially good or potentially prime
farmland, yet only 19.8 percent of the LRA was in cropland
uses. Table 52 and Table 53 present the use of the poten-
tially prime and potentially good farmland respectively.
These soils were more intensively used than the other soils
in the LRA, however they were under utilized relative to
agricultural.production. Less than half of the potentially
prime and less than one-quarter of the potentially good
farmland were in 0r0p1and uses. With an increasing need
for food and fiber products these soils could be shifted

from forest uses to cropland uses.

73

Table 52.--Use of potentially prime farmland in LRA 94S.

 

 

Egg Aggggge Percgnt
Row Crops 86,431 7.7
Small Grains 111,801 10.0
Sod Crops 235,020 21.1
Idle 79.908 7.2
Fruit 6,537 0.6
All Cropland 519,697 46.6
Pasture 120,479 10.8
Forest 447,869 40.1
Other 22‘14§_ 225
TOTAL: 1,116,191 100.0

Table 53.--Use of potentially good farmland in LRA 94S.

 

 

HEEL. Acreage Percent
Row Crops 75,928 2.8
Small Grains 78,516 2.9
Sod Crops 266,812 10.0
Idle 164,696 6.2
Fruit 9.897 0.4
All Cropland 595,849 22.3
Pasture 178,621 6.?
Forest 1,812,735 67.9
Other 21‘261 329
TOTAL: 2,668,372 99.9

LRA 96

Land Resource Area 96, the Western Michigan Fruit Belt
adjoins the eastern edge of Lake Michigan from mid-state
to slightly south of the Mackinaw Straits (Figure 1). The
total inventory acreage was 1,364,660 acres. It contained
4.4 percent of the state's inventory acreage. The area is
characterized by sandy hills and plains covered by orchards,
farmland and forests. About half was forested and half was
cropland in 1967. There were orchards on 6.6 percent of the
area.

Soils

 

Table 54 lists the acreage of each of the Soil Manage-
ment Groups that occurred in LRA 96 and its percentage of
the LRA. Fine textured soils (SMG's 00, 1a, 1b, 10, 1.5a,
1.5b and 1.50) accounted for 3.3 percent (44,879 acres) of
the LRA. Medium textured soils (SMG's beginning with 2 or
3) occupied 20.2 percent (275,244 acres), coarse textured
soils (SMG's beginning with 4 or 5) occupied 67.5 percent
(921,175 acres), organic soils 5.7 percent and (78,366 acres)
alluvial and gravelly soils accounted for 2.9 percent
(39,354 acres) of the LRA. The remaining 0.4 percent
(5,639 acres) was non-soil material.

Well drained soils occurred on 80.9 percent (1,104,155

acres) of the LRA. Somewhat poorly drained soils occupied

74

75

Table 54.--SMG's, their acreage, and percent of LRA 96.

 

SMG Acreage Percent
00 1,663 0.1
1a 131928 1.0
lb 2,906 0.2
10 1,081 0.1
1058. 179877 103
1.5b 3,689 0.3
1-50 3.735 0.3
2.5a 23,868 1.8
2.5a-s 215 tr.
2.5b 7,427 0.5
2.5b-s 31,702 0.1
2.5b-cs 83 0.1
2.50 4,89 0.4
2.50-0 590 tr.
3a 202,853 14.9
38.-S 2,71Ll' 002
3b 4,578 0.3
3b-s 5,815 O.
30-s 2,678 0.2
3/1c 5.974 0.4
3/2a 6,840 0.5
3/2b 1,361 0.1
3/ 2,471 0.2
3 429 tr.
4a 291,036 21.3
4b 5,035 0.4
tr = trace - less than 0.1

 

§M§ Acreage Percent
40 4,569 0.3
4/1b 208 tr.
4/2a 7,677 0.6
4/2b 19,224 1.4
4/20 5,222 0.4
5a 338,154 24.8
58.-h 1.682 001
5b 15,942 1.2
5b-h 11,341 0.8
5C 34,389 2'5
50-a 6,709 0.5
5/2a 4,028 0.3
5/2b 6,580 0.5
5.3a 151,759 11.1
5.7a 17,620 1.3
L-20 3,642 0.3
L-4a 4,192 0.3
L-Mo 14,279 1.1
M0 46,545 3.4
Mc-a 5,967 0.4
M/lc 1,663 0.1
M/BC 6:352 0'5
M/4c 16,403 1.2
M/mc 1,43 0.1
Ga 17,241 1.3
Misc. 6 2‘4,
TOTAL 1,3 ,031 99.9

76

6.4 percent (87,072 acres) of the LRA and poorly and very
poorly drained soils occupied 12.3 percent (167,791 acres).

Potentially prime farmland accounted for 11.6 percent
(157.557 acres) of LRA 96. Potentially good farmland
accounted for an additional 35.4 percent (483,404 acres).
Unique farmland occupied 5.2 percent (71,191 acres), chiefly
orchards.

We:

Forestry was areally the dominant land use in LRA 96,
Table 1. It occurred on 51.6 percent of the LRA. Crop-
land accounted for 34.1 percent, of which 4.1 percent was
row crops, 3.9 percent was grains, 9.2 percent was sod cr0ps,
10.3 percent was idle, and 6.6 percent was fruit crops.
Pasture accounted for 7.9 percent and other uses accounted
for 6.5 percent.

Soils and Land Use

Appendix E lists each of the major land uses in each
of the soil management units in LRA 96. Four SMG's accounted
for greater than 5 percent each of the LRA. These were 3a,
4a, 5a and 5.3a. Combined, they accounted for 72 percent
(983,802 acres) of the LRA.

Table 55 breaks SMG 3a down by SMU's and land uses.

Row cr0ps accounted for 7.2 percent of the SMG. This was

concentrated on the gentle and moderate slopes, with al-

77

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

mm mm 3% slag“. was. m... an“...
N.nn aoN e.aN ean.H o.o o «meson
o.o o e.n aoN o.o o euopmma
w.w w M.%m “Hm.n m.on woN oceHaoNoHHHe
O . N . p :oum
o.o o s.sH aNe o.o o eHeH
o.o o e.oN mne.H o.o o macho oom
o.o o e.n aoN o.o o mcHNNo HHNsm
o.o o o.o o o.ooH eoN macho 3cm

W ommmmg M owmwdlodf M mamas... on:
poncho hm poncho n+0 venous m+< ,Lmammmdmlmmmflw
o.ooH mam.NoN o.oo an .n o.oo H a. a.aa noe.am .Heeoo
e.n ese HH mam.“ n.n m eon.m H e N H s NesHo
a.aN eon.oe n.Ne eoa.NN n.nN aNo.aH H.nN noa.nH season
n.HH HsN.nN a.aN soo.NH n.oH nea.e n.n aeN.N unsound
m.mm MMMHMMH m.NH ”mm.n n.Ne mmanme “.me aaauns ocoHaoNo HH<
. .s .H toH N H .N T: H with
e.n Neo.nH a.H nne H.e noa.e n.oH naN.m oHoH
anH NnnnaN s.n Hen.N a.eH nen.sH N.eH naa.oH macho com
a T a ... a. T a new genes“...

m ammono< M ommouo< M mwmouo< ma ommmso< om

neaoa +m o+o n+4 eeeeNHo emon

.em 4mg :H on mam :H mommmao omonm mo owopcoopon use mom: ccmAIn.mm ensue

78

most no row crops on the steep $10pes. Small grains fol-
lowed a similar pattern.

Sod cr0ps occupied 14.5 percent of the SMG and could
be found on all 810pes. They accounted for 16 to 17 percent
of lands with gentle or moderate slepes, and dropped to 5.4
percent of the steeply sloping lands. They also accounted
for over one-fourth of the eroded moderate slopes.

Idle cropland decreases with increasing slope with one
exception. This was the moderately sloping land with
moderate or greater erosion. Idle cr0p1and occupied 14.4
percent of those lands. Those lands were probably left
idle when erosion was too severe to be properly farmed.

Orchards accounted for 23.7 percent of the lands having
gentle slopes. Of the moderately sloping lands (moderate
or less erosion) 18.1 percent were used for fruit production.
The moderately sloping, eroded lands were used for fruit
production 10.9 percent of the time. Only 4.1 percent of
the steeply sloping (uneroded) lands were used for orchards.
As a whole, 16.7 percent of the SMG was used for fruit
production.

Total 0r0p1and averaged about 65 percent of the
'uneroded, gentle and moderately sloping lands, and slightly
less (57.? percent) of the eroded, moderately 310ping lands.
0n the steeply sloping lands cr0p1and dr0pped to 12.3 percent.
Crepland occupied 53.0 percent of the total land in SMG 3a.

Pasture land, on the uneroded lepes, increased in

79

percentage as slope gradients increased. On the gentle
slopes pasture accounted for only 3.3 percent but this
increased to 10.3 percent of the moderately sloping lands
and 27.5 percent of the steeply sleping lands. Pasture
accounted for 11.5 percent of all lands in SMG 3a.

The percentage of forest land was fairly constant on
gentle and moderate slopes at about 23 percent. The steeply
sloping lands with moderate or less erosion were about half
forested. The total forest acreage was 29.7 percent of the
SMG.

Table 56, Table 57 and Table 58 break down SMG's 4a,
5a and 5.3a, respectively. These SMG's along with SMG 3a
form a partial lithosequence. 7

Row crops decrease in importance as the soil profile
gets coarser. 0n soils within SMG 3a the percentage of row
crops was 7.2 percent, on 4a soils there was only 4.9 percent
row cr0ps, on the 5a soils there was 1.4 percent row crops
and on the 5.3a soils there was only 0.4 percent row crops.

Grains seem to be distributed more by slope than by
soil texture. Grains occurred on 6.9 percent of the lands
in SMG 3a and about 2.6 percent of all the other SMG's. The
percent of grains decreased as slope increased from gentle to
moderate slopes and rarely occurred on the steep slapes.

Sod crops decreased in percentage as the soil profile
got coarser. SMG 3a was 14.5 percent sod crops, SMG 4a
was 11.4 percent, SMG 5a was 4.7 percent, and SMG 5.3a was

0.7 percent sod crops.

80

 

 

 

 

 

 

o.ooH amm.n o.ooH mao.N o.ooH eH .qeeos
e.en HeH N o.o o o.o aim senpo
o.o o o.oH eoN a.as aoN season
o.o o o.o o o.o o enopmma
s.He ees.n o.oa neo.H H.on eoN oeNHaoso HH<
e.Nn nee.H H.oe asN.H H.on eoN pHooa
e.eN nHe.H a.aN HNe o.o o eHoH
o.o o o.o o o.o o maono oom
o.o o o.o o o.o o eeHNso HHNsm
o.o o o.o o o.o o macho 30m
M 0M0000< M sumoso¢ &\‘ ommouo< omD
copose +m venous mflu nwmdso m¢ mommmno macaw
o.ooH Hso.HaN a.aa eon.Ne o.ooH N a.aa o.ooH HnH.soH .qeeoe
N.N NemdoN e.s eHe.n N.e eon.e N.e Nmnqe Nonpo
a.Hs neN.HNH N.ae eee.nn n.os nee.en n.nN aaN.eN season
o.HH aNs.sn a.aH ase.sH n.a ona.e N.oH Nne.oH esspmoa
n.an aen.sHH N.oH ans.e n.ns HNa.Hs n.en nse.en oemHaoso HH<
a.a esm.eN N.o aaH e.sH nna.nH o.HH eos.HH pHssm
n.oH Hoe.on n.n NnN.e o.nH sns.NH s.o ana.a eHeH
s.HH eoN.nn N.N Noe.H e.e aeN.e N.NN anH.nN macho oom
e.N aas.a o.o o e.N ooa.N e.s aaa.s eeHNso HHNSm
o.s nnH.sH n.o eoN e.s aen.s N.o oen.a maoso gem
1%. owmoso< M manoho¢ M» ommoso< .IMt ommoho< om:
geeoe +m m+o me moommHo enon

.00 «mg :n m: 02m an mommmno emoam mo owmvcoosom cam mom: osmAun.em manna

81

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

o.ooH oao.a o.ooH naa.n o.ooH amN.N .qeeoe
N.HH HNo.H o.o o o.o o seepo
o.en saN.n o.HN sHN.H o.ooH aeN.N season
s.nH smN.H n.aN Noa.H o.o o monsoon
H.an H n.n n.as ane.N o.o o oeNHaoNo HHe
e.s nos s.sH Nno o.o o pHoNn
N.nH eaH.H H.eN eNe.H o.o o eHoH
N.oH esa.H o.o o o.o o moono oom
N.N soN n.n soN o.o o eeHNNo HHmem
o.o o s.n eaH o.o o maoso 30m

M sumoso¢ M wwwoso< & ommosom mm:
620on +m Umfiohm n+0 @20on Q mmmmmHU ‘mfloam
a.aa nnH.mnn o.ooH m o.N a.aa aan.na H.ooH ann.neH .geeoa
N.o Nea.on nqnul nwo.N s.n omo.e N.NH ene4aH Noepo
s.nn nsa.naH n.Ne an.Hn a.aa esN.nm a.as an.He season
m.s aan.eH a.e anH.s H.s Nsa.n n.n nn.e ensemoa
.nN nNN.ea n.n HHn.s e.aN HaH.oN o.sn HH.an oeoHaoeo HHe
a.s men.eH n.o soN e.N aNs. e.e nHa.oH pHosa
e.sH Naa.as n.n ns.n a. H noN. H N.nH NHn.eN eHoH
a.s NHa.nH s.H an e.e aoN.e .s eeo.a macho oom
e.N eoa.e o.o o e.H eon.H n.s Naa.e eeHNNo HHeSm
s.H one.s o.o o a.o sso n.N ooo.n maoso 30m

M 0mm090¢ (M ammoso¢ NW1. owmoso< M mummhofi 0m:
geeoe +m n+o me eemmoHo enon

.mm <mn an mm 02m an mommmao ogoam mo 0mMPCoohon can mom: ccmqnn.am wanna

82

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

o.ooH mew o.ooH nmo.n o.ooH nNm .qeaoe
o.o o n.N o.o o Nonso
o.o o H.en nNe.H o.ooH nNe season
o.o o o.o o o.o o opopmoa
o.ooH eaH o.en nNe.N o.o o oeNHaoNo HHe
o.o o a.n eaH o.o o pHssm
o.ooH eaH H.es aNs.N o.o o eHoH
o.o o o.o o o.o o moono eom
o.o o o.o o o.o o mcHNNo HHmsm
o.o o a.n eaH o.o o maoso 30m

N1 lawnmso< (M ommoho¢ M manono< mm:
Umfiohm +m @20on 9+0 fimUOHm m< mmmmmHU mQOHm
o.ooH ana.HnH H.ooH mon.aH o.ooH nna. H.ooH ean.Ho .geeoe
e.N naN.s e.e oeH H s.H mHe o.N Hoe.H Nenpo
H.oe nNe.HNH N.ae aeN.aH H.ee eoa.en a.aa NeH.ne season
s.N aan.n n.N ans H.n aaN.N o.H nse esoemma
a.sH NnN.NN o.o o s.a HHn.n e.aH ona.nH oeoHaoso HH<
m.H HeH.N o.o o o.o o s.N noa.H pHoNa
.a een.sH o.o o H.n HaN.N e.HH ons.a oHoH
a.o oao.H o.o o n.o eHN o.H Nee macho eom
a.N Nao.s o.o o n.H noe n.s aes.n eeHNNo HHNsm
s.o nan o.o o s.o aaH N.o eaH macho som
+M 0mmoso< (M, mMMmso< .M mummso¢ (la memoso< om: «1|
aesoa +m n+o me eemmoHo ooOHm

.ea emq :H Nn.n ozm :H

mommmao macaw mo swepcoosmm cam moms ncmqnn.mm onnme

83

Idle cropland increased in percentage through all but
the sandiest of soils, where it declined somewhat. The
lands in SMG 3a were 7.8 percent idle, those in 4a were
10.5 percent idle, those in 5a were 14.8 percent idle and
those in 5.3a were 9.5 percent idle.

Fruit crops (mostly orchards) declined in importance
as soils became coarser. It occupied 16.? of the lands
in SMG 3a and dropped to 1.4 percent of the lands in SMG
5.3a.

Total cropland followed a pattern similar to the orchards.
It decreased from 53.0 percent in SMG 3a to only 14.7 percent
of SMG 5.3a.

Lands in SMG's 3a and 4a were about 11.5 percent pasture.
Pasture declined in importance on coarser soils. Only 4.9
percent of SMG 5a was pastured and only 2.4 percent of the
lands in SMG 5.3a were pastured.

Forest land followed a trend Opposite to most other
uses. As the soil profile got coarser the percentage of
forest land increased. On soils in SMG 3a there was 29.7
percent forest. The percentage went up to 41.7 percent on
the soils in SMG 4a, 57.5 percent on the soils in SMG 5a and
80.1 percent on soils in SMG 5.3a.

Eroded SMU's were concentrated on the steep slopes in
SMG’s 4a and 5a, and were predominant on the moderate slopes
in SMG 5.3a. Most of the eroded land in SMG 4a was crop-
land. Fruit 0rops and idle cr0p1and were the only cr0p1and

uses found on the eroded slopes. On the eroded moderate

84
lepes there was twice as much fruit as idle. On the eroded
steep slopes idle cropland, fruit cr0ps and forests were of
similar importance. A greater variety of uses were found
on the eroded slopes of the 5a soils. All the gently sloping,
eroded slopes were forested. The moderate sloping, eroded
lands were about 50 percent cr0p1and, 30 percent pasture and
20 percent forest. The eroded steep slopes were 36 percent
forested, about 14 percent pasture and about 39 percent cr0p-
land. The eroded moderate slopes in SMG 5.3a were mostly
idle cropland (48 percent) and forest (36 percent). Very
small acreages of eroded slopes existed on the gentle or
steep slapes.

Poorly drained, sandy soils (SMG 50, Table 59) were
used less intensively than their well drained counterparts.
On similar slopes (O to 6 percent) the poorly drained, 50.
soils had only 15.3 percent 0r0p1and. There was over twice
that percentage used for cropland in the 5a soils (Table 57,
first column). The percentage of pasture and forest is
higher in the 50 soils to make up for the lesser percentage
of cropland. Pasture accounted for 9.1 percent of the 50
soils, three times that of the 5a soils. Forests accounted
for 73.2 percent of the 50 soils. This was about 24 percent
more than the forested 5a soils.

Organic soils were even less intensively used than the
poorly drained sandy soils. Table 60 presents the land uses
of the deep organic soils (SMG M0). 0r0p1and accounted for

only 3.6 percent of these soils and pasture accounted for

85
Table 59.--Land uses and percentage of SMG 50 in LRA 96.

 

Use Acreage Percent
Row Cr0ps 198 0.6
Small Grains 1,210 3.6
Sod 0r0ps 835 2.4
Idle 3,035 8.8
Fruit 0 0.0
All Cropland 5,278 15.3
Pasture 3,128 9.1
Forest 25,160 73.2
Other 223 224
TOTAL: 34,389 100.0

Table 60.--Land uses and percentage of SMG M0 in LRA 96.

 

 

gge Aggggge Percent
Row Cr0ps 416 0.9
Small Grains O 0.0
Sod 0r0ps 829 1.8
Idle 415 0.9
Fruit 0 0.0
All Cr0pland 1,660 3.6
Pasture 1,278 2.7
Forest 42.797 91.9
Other 2;; 222

TOTAL: 46,545 99-9

86

another 2.7 percent. Forests accounted for 91.9 percent, of
SMG M0.

Potential Future Uses

Cropland accounted for about 34 percent of LRA 96. This
was the case in 1967 even though 47 percent of the LRA was
potentially good or potentially prime farmland. Table 61
and Table 62, present the uses of the potentially prime and
potentially good farmland, reSpectively. Note that about
two-thirds of the potentially prime and less than half of
the potentially good farmland was in cropland uses. This
indicates an under utilization of potentially suitable farm-
land in LRA 96. Should the world or domestic demand for
agricultural products increase, many acres in LRA 96 could
be shifted from forest and other non-agricultural uses into
agricultural production.

Another potential future use for some of the lands in
LRA 96 is fruit production. Of all the SMU's that had at
least 5 percent of their total acreage in fruit production,
(Table 63), only about 13.2 percent were cropped to fruits
in 1967, Table 63. Of the well drained SMU's only 13.1
percent had fruit crops on them, the somewhat poorly drained
SMU's contained 23.9 percent fruit cr0ps, and the poorly
drained SMU's were 10.0 percent fruit 0r0ps. Thus there is
a great potential to expand the fruit production in LRA 96.
This is espically the case since about half (48.8 percent)

of the unique lands were neither potentially prime nor

87
Table 61.--Use of potentially prime farmland in LRA 96.

 

Use Acreage Percent
Row Cr0ps 15,605 9.9
Small Grains 17,425 11.1
Sod Cr0ps 36,317 23.1
Idle 14,949 9-5
Fruit 19.750 12.5
All 0r0p1and 104,046 66.0
Pasture 9,706 6.2
Forest 36.120 23.0
Other 22685 422‘
TOTAL: 157.557 100.1

Table 62.--Use of potentially good farmland in LRA 96.

 

ߤe_f Acreage Percent
Row CrOps 29,999 6.1
Small Grains 22,515 4.6
Sod 0r0ps 63,569 13.0
Idle 44,402 9.1
Fruit 43,832 9.0
All Cr0pland 204,317 41.7
Pasture 41,221 8.4
Forest 211,132 43.1
Other 3241;4_ 622

88

 

.pwppm .pmmwm bwmmm _wmmnm .mwmmm mthmmm .geeoe
o.o o o.o o N.e aae.Nn seapo
N.as eno.n e.aH sNo.H e.nn sss.eNN season
a.NN ene.H n.sN HHs.H n.n oea.es esoemoa
H.on ens.N H.en aan.n a.es Noa.oHn oeNHaoso HHe
o.oH nHo a.nN oan.H H.nH ana.ne pHosa
H.n aHs H.oH oan n.nH oan.em eHoH
N.e eNs n.oN HaH.H s.HH Hsa.Na macho oom
e.a Noe e.n moN a.s NoH.on meHoso HHeEm
o.o o o.o o a.n NNn.an maono 30m
psoosmm mmmwso< Psoohom owmoso< Pamohom oumoho¢ mmm

 

 

 

mMCnmpn nasoom nonnmmn Hflsoom pm03080m mosnmsnflaos

.ea emH eH oeoHsNoe esoHco peeoNea n semeH pm mooHoeH page o.osm no ems--.ne oHeee

potentially good farmland.

89

LRA 22

Land Resource Area 97, the Southwestern Michigan
Fruit and Truck Belt, is located in the southwestern
corner of the Lower Peninsula (Figure 1). The total
inventory acreage was 1,054,587 acres, or 3.4 percent
of the state's inventory acreage.

This LRA is characterized by broad flat sandy plains
and gently to moderately sloping moraines. Land uses were

varied with 62.4 percent in cropland in 1967.

Soils

 

Each of the SMG's that occurred in LRA 97 and it's
percentage of the LRA is listed in Table 64. Fine
textured soils (SMG's beginning with a 1) accounted for
8.9 percent (93,521 acres) of the LRA, medium textured
soils (SMG's beginning with a 2 or a 3) accounted for 39.2
percent (412,955 acres) and coarse textured soils (SMG's
beginning with a 4 or a 5) accounted for 41.6 percent
(438,507 acres). Organic soils occurred on 5.0 percent
(52,781 acres) of the LRA. Alluvial soils occurred on 5.1
percent (53.891 acres) of the area. The remaining 0.3
percent (2,934 acres) was occupied by non-soil material.

Well drained soils occurred on 58.7 percent (619,263
acres) of the LRA. The somewhat poorly drained soils

occupied 20.4 percent (215,190 acres) of the LRA and

90

91

Table 64.--SMG's, their acreage, and percentage of LRA 97.

 

 

SMG Acreage Percent SMG Acreage Percent
1a 13,511 1.3 4b 9,848 0.9
lb 21,913 2.1 40 9,849 0.9
10 1,835 0.2 4/1b 33,300 3.2
1.5a 29,235 2.8 4/2a 5,653 0.5
1.5b 17,293 1.6 4/2b 782 0.1
1.50 9.734 0.9 4/20 2,293 0.2
2.5a 38,066 3.6 5a 17.561 1.7
2.53-8 7,938 008 5b 69.22“ 606
2-5b 14.755 1.4 5b-h 3.053 0-3
2.5b-s 17,230 1.6 50 42,988 4.1
2.50 2,025 0.2 5/2a 25,618 2.4
2.5c-s 30,014 2.8 5/2b 17,320 1.6
3a 131,907 12.5 5.3a 154,101 14.6
38.-m 5.893 006 14.28. 9,221 009
3b 380 tr. L-2bc 38,190 3.6
3/1a 19.977 1.9 L-4bc 4,030 0.4
3/1c 7,878 0.7 L-Mc 612 tr.
3/2a 8,681 0.8 M0 37,346 3.5
3/2b 5,948 0.6 M/ic 422 tr.
3éfia 10 .146 9.8 M/ c 3, 61 0.3
3 5b .144 0.4 M/ c 2, 07 0.2
3 50 14,548 1.4 M/mc 9,045 0.9
4a 46,917 4.4 Misc. 2 4 923
TOTAL:1,05 ,5 7 99.8

tr. = trace - less than 0.1

92
poorly and very poorly drained soils occupied 20.6 percent
(217,202 acres).
Slopes were mostly gentle with 79.9 percent (842,312
acres) of the LRA occurring on slopes less than 6 percent.

The moderate slopes accounted for 16.5 percent (174,402 acres)
and the steep slopes accounted for 3.6 percent (37,874 acres).
Potentially prime farmland occurred on 38.8 percent
(409,087 acres) of the LRA and potentially good farmland
occupied 31.4 percent (330,714 acres). Unique farmland

occupied 7.7 percent (81,515 acres) of the total LRA.

Land Use

The dominant land use in LRA 97 was cropland in 1967,
Table 1. It occurred on 62.4 percent of the LRA. Row crops
accounted for 18.3 percent, small grains 7.9 percent, sod
crops 11.2 percent, idle 13.3 percent and fruit crops
accounted for 11.8 percent. Forests occupied 26.5 percent,
pasture occupied 4.0 percent and other uses occupied the

remaining 7.0 percent.

Soils and Land Use

Appendix F lists each of the land uses in each of the
SMU's in LRA 97. Fbur SMG's each accounted for over 5
percent of the LRA. There were 3a, 3/5a, 5b and
5.3a.- Also discussed are SMG's 2.5a, 4a, 50 and Mc.

93

Tables 65, 66, 68 and 71 illustrate land use by slope
classes in a lithosequence, SMG's 2.5a, 3a, 4a, and 5.3a,
respectively. Total cropland increased in percentage
from the 2.5a to 3a soils and again from the 3a to the 4a
soils, but declined in percentage from the 4a to the 5.3a
soils. In general, the 5.3a soils were the least inten-
sively used, with total cropland accounting for only 45.5
percent of it. The 2.5a, 3a, and 4a soils had between
70 and about 80 percent total cropland.

Cropland uses showed no definite trends as soil texture
became coarser. Row crops, for example, were most common
on the 4s soils and least common on the 5.3a soils and
the 3a soils. Small grains were also most common on the 4a
soils, but were in roughly equal percentages on the 2.5a
and 3a soils and slightly less common on th05.3a soils.
Fruit crops increased in percentage up to the 5.3a soils
where they decreased to a percentage about even with the
3a soils.

Pasture declined in percentage as texture became
coarser, from 10.6 percent of the 2.5a soils to 1.0 percent
of the 5.3a soils. Forests were equally common on the
2.5a and 3a soils, declined on the 4a soils and greatly
increased on the 5.3a soils.

The well drained, two storied 3/5a soils (Table 67)
were used slightly differently than any of the other
well drained soils. About one-quarter was used for

row crops, 9 percent was used for small grains, 15.4

94

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

o.ooH oaH o.ooH eHn.N o.ooH oea .qeeoe
o.o o o.o o o.o o senpo
o.ooH oaH N.e oaH o.o o season
o.o o o.o o -o.o o esoomoa
o.o o e.Ha eNH.N o.ooH oea oeeHaono HHe
o.o o N.e oaH o.ooH oea pHoNa
o.o o s.eH oon o.o o eHoH
o.o o o.a aoN o.o o mooso oom
o.o o o.o o o.o o meHmeo HHoEm
o.o o N.en asn.H o.o o maoso 36m
R mMMmHO< .N 0M6mho< N mmmmho< mmD
Umflohm .Im @26on 0+0 @36on m+< mmmmmHU mQOHm
o.ooH meo.en o.ooH ooa.H H.ooH seo.sH a.aa mHe.eH .qeeoe
a.N HHqu o.o o- s.s NHe H.N senpo
o.sH sae.n o.oe oNH.H e.NH neo.H a.NH eon.N season
e.oH Hno.s o.oH o H e.HN nso.n n.s oHo monsoon
e.Ha onn.aN o.on one n.He Hee.e o.oe HHN.nH oquaoso HH<
a.a sea.n o.o o n.n aNo.H e.o aoe.H pHon
e.a ssa.n o.on one n.HH aem.H s.e aoN.H anon
s.eH esN.e o.o o n.HH nNe.H n.nN sHs.s macho oom
a.m an.N o.o o a.N Nos e.o Nae.H meHono HHosm
a.aN Non.HH o.o o e.eN NNo.s n.Hn Hna.n macho 36m
[M ommoso< R mwmmnod 7M ommonod M ommoho< mm:
geeoe +m o+o m+< omomNHo moon

.aa emH :H «n.N use sH

mommmao macaw mo owmvcoosom use mom: unequn.m© magma

95

 

 

 

 

 

o.ooH eaN.n o.ooH nH .oN a.aa o e.H .qeeos
s.nH mom e.e nnm.H o.o o senpo
o.on neo.H n.nH nHe.N o.se aaH.H smesoa
a.HH nNe N.o Nas.H o.o o esopmoa
a.an aaa.H e.Na naa.sH a.en Hee ocoHaoso HHe
e.n oaH a.a nno.N n.oH oaH pHosm
n.NN aaH.H n.nN oHN.n e.nN Has oHoH
a.HH nNe e.sH Hoo.n o.o o mdooo oom
o.o o a.HH eHs.N o.o o meHmso HHosm
o.o o N.HH HHn.N o.o o macho 36m

R mmmmhod K mwmmho< N oWNmHo< mmD
Umvohw +m UmUOHm 0+0 UmUon m+< mmmmmHU WdOHm
a.aa aoa.HnH o.ooH naN.N o.ooH a .Hn o.ooH NaH.oa .qeaoe
N40: wmm4mnl o.o o N.e wem.N H.e seN. sonpo
a.sH oHa.aH e.ns eaa e.nN Hen.a s.n sHN. season
n.n ene.s o.o o n.n eno.H H.N oes.H esopmoa
o.Ma oee.ma N.en aaN.H n.Ne eas.oN s.sn an.an oeoHaono HHe
m. H NNn.oN o.o o s. H aee.s e.oH eno.nH eHssa
.aH ono.nN n.nn eoe H.nN nao.e N.o am .e oHoH
s.aH sse.nN n.oN Has N.o HHe.N o.aN nn .oH macho oom
a.a enN.oH o.o o e.s ans.H H.a Hen.e mcHNNo HHNsm
N.eH wo:.mn o.o o m.m dwo.m n.om nHe.sa macho 30m

M ommoso< M 4wmmoso¢ M ommeho< M1 ommoso< mm:
geaoa +m o+o m+< mmmmNHo enon

.am «mg :n mm 02m 0n mommmao ononm mo ommPCoopom use mom: oceanu.ee manna

96

 

 

 

 

 

 

a.aa mno.N o.ooH mmm.e o.ooH oaH .qeeoe
o.o o N.mN ee N o.o o soepo
a.aN ane o.o o o.o o pmesom
a.en a o.H a.HH sHo.H o.o o esopmea
n.nn o a e.en oeo.n o.ooH oaH eemHooNo HHe
o.o o o.HN sen.H o.o o pHosm
n.nn ona N.HH aea o.o o eHoH
o.o o n.o No o.ooH oaH moose oom
o.o o s.N oN o.o o meHmso HHmem
o.o o s.nH NeH.H o.o o mooso 36m

M mmmoso< M amneso< w ommosom mm:
Umvohm +0 000090 0+0 020090 0+< mmmmwflo mQOHm
a.aa H.noH a.aa a . o.ooH ea.aH o.ooH eoN.ne .geeoe
N.eH mmm.eH e.n enN e.mH eom.n s.nH aso.oH Nenpo
N.nH oHa.nH N.oe saH.n o.oN ana.n e.e ona.n season
H.e amN.e N.n aoN s.oH Heo.N o.n. mna.H epzpmma
N.Ne man.se a.NH ano o.os oee.a e.Na nas.as oeoHaoso HHe
.e nna.o o.o o H.s eHe n.a Hno.e sHosa
N.n Hos.n n.o nNe a.n aaa N.n nao.N eHeH
s.nH aso.nH N.n aoN H.oH noo.N m.aH HNe.NH moose oom
o.o aaN.a o.o o a.sH Hoa.N .a aeH.e meHNNo HHNsm
n.sN eao.nN o.o o o.aH ann.n n.Hn ann.oN mooso 36m

M, ommoso< M museuo< AIM ommoso< 11% museso< 0m:
.geeoe +m o+o m+e mammoHo aeon

.am <mq an mm\m 02m an mommmao macaw mo ommpsoosom cam mom: vanquu.ae wanna

97

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

H.ooH aoo.n o.ooH oen .qeaoe
o.sH HNs o.o o Neepo
n.oN aoe o.o o pmoson
o.a aoN o.o o. ensemma
o.oe oea.H o.ooH oen oeoHaoso HHe
o.oH oan o.ooH own sHooa
o.o o o.o o eHoH
e.eN aaa o.o o moose oom
o.a aoN o.o o eeHNso HHosm
n.e oaH o.o o mooso 36m
R mfldmho< iR www.mhodw mm:
0®0ohm 0+0 000090 0< mmmmmHO mQOHm
o.ooH aHa.es o.ooH nmn.H o.ooH oen.HH a.aa ooe.on .qeeoe
n.n moeqH o.o o e.H aoN e.n mNH.H soepo
N.NH esa.n a.nH oaH e.eH aee.H a.a oeo.n season
s.n eHe.H a.eN Han a.H NHN e.N soe osopmma
n.oe asa.an s.an Nea a.aa oeo.a e.ne ana.nN oemHaoso HHe
n.oH Hoe.e o.o o o.oN oen.N s.aH Han.n pHosa
a.s aaH.N a.nH oaH n.n aso e.n NeH.H eHoH
o.oH eae.m a.nH oaH a.aH nnN.N N.s an.H moose oom
e.NH Hna. a.aN Nos e.NH an.H e.NH oeo.n msHoNo HHNsm
a.sn oeN.eH o.o o N.oH .eoH.N o.es see.nH moono 30m
R mmmmholw R mflmoho< R demHod R mddmhodw mm:
geeoa +m o+o me memmeHo moon

.50 ¢ma an m: 02m an mommmao mmoam mo swapsoosom use mom: 00091:.mo manna

98

 

 

H.ooH mNN.am o.ooH neo.H o.ooH aaH.om .qeeoe
n.n eee N o.o o n.n eee N Nmepo
a.nn sss.nN o.ooH aso.H a.Nn aan.NN season
e.N eoa.H o.o o e.N eoa.H osoemma
a.aa eoN.Hs o.o o s.oe eoN.Hs oemHooso HHe
a.NH eoa.e o.o o H.nH eoa.e pHosm
n.nN sHH.eH o.o o e.nN sHH.eH eHoH
o.o e s.n o.o o o.o ems.n maoso oom
e.n e e.N o.o o a.n e e.N meHmso HHNsm
a.HH eeo.e o.o o a.HH eoo.e moose 36m
0 manopo< R1 ammoso< ,0 ammoso< om:
geeoe oeooso me me memmmHo eoOHm
.am <mq a“ pm 02m CH mommmao macaw mo owmpsooaom 000 men: ostus.om manna

 

a.aa mma.N .qeeoe
n.N Nmm l Noepo
H.sn eee.sH sewage
a.n eae.H enspmma
e.an nne.nN ocoHaoNo HH<
n.o noo.s pHona
H.oN oNe.e eHoH
n.HH ene.s moose eom
e.n nee.H mchso HHosm
N.nH aHn.e maoso zom
Pflmohwm mwmmho< mmD

.mm <mA :n on

02m mo owmpcoonom use mom: ocean-.m© manna

99

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

o.ooH e. a.aa man.NH o.ooH NHH.N .qeeoe
m.ee omN.m o.nH e H o.o o seepo
.NH aoe a.Hn aee.e e.an ose season
n.s aoN e.H aoN o.o o enzymes
e.eH eHe e.Nn aoN.s N.oe NAN.H ocmHooso HHe
0.0H mam o.s 0N0 o.o o pwzpm
o.o o e.eH NnH.N N.oe NaN.H oHeH
o.o o 0.0 o o.o o macho vow
o.o o e.e ose o.o o eeHNso HHosm
o.o o a.s aoe o.o o maoso 36m

R 00000330. R 0MO0H0< R 0MO0H0< 000
000090 +0 000000 0+0 0000.H0 00 00000H0 00.0HW
o.ooH HoH.an o.ooH mmmhm o.ooH oaH.eH o.ooH Hen.aoH .geeoe
o.oH oae.eH o.o o o.s eae o.oH ana.oH seepo
e.Ns oee.ne H.sa eeo.e n.on soo.a e.os ons.ss season
o.H oes.H o.o o n.N aHs e.o Hne esoemma
n.ns Heo.oa a.n oen. n.sn aae.a a.es nNn.nn oemHaoso HH<
o.nH aHo.oN o.o o n.oH eon.n o.nH neo.nH pHosm
e.sH ens.NN a.n oon e.NN nHH.s n.nH Hen.sH eHeH
a.m eNN.a o.o o N.n eHe o.e eoe.e moose oom
s. oeN.n o.o o .N nNs e.n naa.n meHmso HHosm
e.a oNH.nH o.o o a.e aHN.H H.NH saN.nH moopo 36m

R mmmopo< (M, ommono¢ R, ommmho< R masoho¢ on:
neeoe +m o+o me mommmHo enon

.50 0mg a“ am.m 020 an mommmao macaw mo 0009200900 one new: masqun.aa manna

100

percent for sod crops. 5.2 percent was idle and 8.5 percent was
used for fruit crops. Total cropland accounted for 62.h
percent, 6.1 percent was pasture, and forest and other

uses accounted for 15.2 percent and 16.2 percent. respectively.

Generally, as slope increased in the well drained
soils cropland and it's component uses decreased and
forest uses increased.

Table 69. Table 70 and Table 71 presents a topo-
sequence (SMG's 5c, 5b and 5.3a. respectively) of sandy
soils. Total cropland was a similar percentage of the
poorly and somewhat poorly drained soils and dropped
about 10 percent on the well drained. gently slaped soils.
Cropland uses showed no consistent pattern of change with
changes in drainage. Row crops were in slightly higher
percentage on the Sc soils and lower, but similar on the
5b and 5.3a soils. Small grains were of a similar percentage
of all of the SMG's. Sod crops were most common on the
Sc soils and about equally common on the 5b and 5.3a soils.
Idle cropland was most common on the wetter soils and
least common on the dry 5.3a soils. Fruit crops were
least common on the Sc soils and in about equal percentage
on the 5b and 5.3a soils. Pasture land declined in
percentage as the soils became drier, and forest lands
were at a maximum percentage on the 5.3a soils and equally
common on the 5b and 5c soils.

The deep organic soils (SMG Mo, Table 72) were

daninantly forested. Cropland accounted for only about

101

Table 72.--Land uses and percentage of SMG Me in LRA 97.

 

flge Acreage Percent
Row Crops 5,600 15.0
Small Grains 628 1.7
Sod Craps 1,249 3.3
Idle 2,878 7.7
Fruit 0 . 0.0
All Cropland 10,355 27.7
Pasture 4,105 11.0
Forest 20,128 53.9
Other g¢ij 2‘3

TOTAL: 37.345 100.0

102
one-quarter of the use of the organic soils, with row
crops being the most common cr0p1and use. Note the

absence of fruit crops on the deep organic soils.
Potential Future Uses

Cropland accounted for about 62 percent of the
land use in LRA 97. yet the potentially prime and
potentially good farmland occurred on about 70 percent
of the total LRA. Table 73 and Table 74 presents the
use of the potentially prime and potentially good
farmland. respectively. Note that 71.3 percent of the
potentially prime and only 61.6 percent of the potent-
ially good farmland was actually in cropland uses.
Thus the suitable farmland was under used for agricultural
uses. As world and local populations demands an increased
supply of agricultural products much of the under used good
farmland could be shifted to agricultural production.
Another potential use of some of the land in LRA
97 is for increased fruit production. Table 75 indicates
how those SHU's that contained at least 5 percent fruit
crops in 1967 were used. About 16 percent of the well
drained and somewhat poorly drained SMU's, and about 11
percent of the poorly drained SMU's were actually used
for fruit production. Thus there exists a great potential
to increase fruit production in LRA 97 over the 1967 levels.
This is especially the case since 23.3 percent of the lands
in the potentially unique farmland (lands included in the

103

Table 73.--Use of potentially prime farmland in LRA 97.

 

Egg Acreage Percent
Row 0r0ps 97,434 23.8
Small Grains 46,449 11.4
Sod Crops 62,560 15.3
Idle 39.888 9.8
Fruit 45,262 11.1
All Crepland 291.593 71.3
Pasture 16,535 4.0
Forest 73,226 17.9
Other , 22,133 éé§
TOTAL: 409,087 100.0

Table 74.--Use of potentially good farmland in LRA 97.

 

Egg, Acreage Percent
Row 0r0ps 64,289 19.4
Small Grains 23,673 7.2
Sod 0r0ps 34,581 10.5
Idle 44,006 13.3
Fruit 37,124 11.2
All Crepland 203,673 61.6
Pasture 15,682 4.?
Forest 91,441 27.6
Other 12,9;§, 6‘9

TOTAL: 330,714 99-9

104

 

0h00 mmmumm .pvppmy 000.000 mhmm 000.000
5.0 000.0 s.n 000.0 0.0 mmm.ms
0.0m 0:m.0m 0.mm «$0.0: e.oH n0m.ood
0.0 00”.: 0.0 000.0 N.N msm.ma
0.00 mms.os n.ou Hmfl.ssa 0.00 0so.mmm
0.00 000.5 0.0a oen.Nm 0.00 000.H0
a.aa H00.oH 0.0a 000.5m N.HH 000.00
n.o 000.0 n.HH eoa.mm a.aa 500.s0
n.n 020.0 0.0 2H0.0H 0.u www.mm
o.sH mofi.ofl 0.0a oom.mm s.om mam.sofi
PCOop0m 0um0no< Ps0op0m wam0pc< PC0oh0m 0000ho<

 

00CH0QQ hauoom

 

 

U0Cw09q hapoom 90:30Eom

 

 

emcemen Ham:

ig<eoe
emcee

pm0nom
0pzpmmm
ecmadoeo Ade
waspm

0H0H

macho 00m
msampo Hamsm
mmoao 30m

00:

.mm ems as squeegee 0200:: pcmoemd 0 amass pm message page 0.02m mo ems--.mm magma

105

SMU's containing at least 5 percent fruit lands) were neither
potentially prime nor potentially good farmland, and could
be devoted to fruit production without competing with other

cropland uses.

LBA_2§

Land Resource Area 98, the Southern Michigan Drift
Plain, occupies the central portion of the southern half
of Michigan's Lower Peninsula. The 1967 inventory acreage
was 7,819,067 acres, or 25.2 percent of the state's inven-
tory acreage.

The area is characterized by large, gently sleping
till and outwash plains, rolling moraines and large organic
areas and some flood plains. The dominant land use in

1967 was cr0p1and.

Table 76 lists the acreage of each SMG in the LRA and
its percentage of the LRA. Fine textured soils (SMG's Ob,
0c, 1a, 1b, 1c, 1.5a, 1.5b and 1.5c) accounted for 8.5
percent (667,124 acres), medium textured soils (SMG's
beginning with a 2 or a 3) accounted for 55.6 percent
(4,345,618 acres), and coarser textured soils accounted
for 23.1 percent (1,802,903 acres) of the LRA. Organic
soils occurred on 9.0 percent (701,063 acres) of the LRA
and alluvial soils occurred on 3.3 percent (259.718 acres)
of the LRA. The remaining 0.1 percent (42,638 acres) was
occupied by gravelly soils and miscellaneous non-soil

materials.

106

107

Table 76.--SMG's, their acreage, and percentage of LRA 98.

 

SMG Acreage Percent
Ob 3,229 tr.
Oc 3,072 tr.
1a 30,972 0.4
lb 42.397 0.5
1c 8,852 0.1
1.5a 315,037 4.0
1.5b 152.772 2.0
1.5c 110,838 1.4
2.5a 904,378 1.6
2.5a-s 26,634 0.3
2'5b “#29379 5'7
2-5b-S 35.307 0~5
2.5c 216,048 2.8
2.5c-c 5,339 0.1
2.5c-s 17,628 0.2
2.5c-cs 1,035 tr.
3a 970,182 2.4
3b 89,698 1.1
3b-s 6,965 0.1
Be 54.951 0.?
3c-s 8,834 0.1
3/1a 7,867 0.1
3/10 5.595 0-1
3/2a 101,476 1.3
3/2b 46,517 0.6
3/2c 6,527 0.1
3/5a 1.150.095 4.7
B/Sa-m 51.656 0-7
3/5b 82.933 1-1
3/5c 98.501 1-3
3/Ra 14,041 0.2
3/Rc 1.032 t .

tr. = trace - less than 0.1

 

SMG Acreage Percent
4a 582,479 7.4
4b 176,121 2.3
4c 115.977 1-5
4/1a 1,129 tr.
4/1b 34,571 0.4
4/1c 5,448 0.1
4/2a 7,285 0.5
4/2b 0,008 0.5
4/2b-s 814 tr.
4/2c 27,634 0.4
5a 118,2 3 1.5
5b 85,086 1.1
Sb'h 6:395 0'1
5c 165.331 2.1
5c-a 1,268 tr.
5/2a 40,171 0.5
5/2b 15,741 0.2
5-3a 290.685 3-7
5-7a 58. 17 0-7
L-2a 6, 83 001
L-2bc 208,783 2.7
L-4a 1 ,815 0.2
L-4bc 1 .293 0.2
L-Mc 16,344 0.2
Mc 591,641 7.6
Mc-a 8,148 0.1
M/lc 2,584 tr.
M/ 0 17,673 0.2
M 0 52,742 0.7
M/mc 28,275 0.4
Ga 4 43: trd
Misc. 2 20 O.
TOTAL:7,819,067 100.0

108

Well drained soils océurred on 60.4 percent (4,721,579
acres) of the LRA. Somewhat poorly drained soils occupied
16.1 percent (1,260,933 acres) of the LRA, and poorly drained
and very poorly drained soils occurred on 23.0 percent
(1,794,348 acres) of the LRA.

Slapes were dominantly gentle with 78.8 percent
(6,164,954 acres) of the LRA having slopes less than 6
percent. Moderately sIOping lands occurred on 18.0 percent
(1,411,294 acres) and steeply slaping lands occupied the
remaining 3.1 percent (242,819 acres).

LRA 98 is characterized by a significant acreage of
high quality soils. Potentially prime farmland accounted
for 48.2 percent (3,768,083 acres) of the LRA. Potentially
good farmland accounted for an additional 37.4 percent
(2,921,257 acres). There was no unique farmland in LRA 98
in 1967.

Land Use

0r0p1and accounted for 62.8 percent of the total land
use in 1967, Table 1. Row craps accounted for 19.6 percent,
small grains accounted for 12.7 percent, sod craps 19.5
percent, idle cr0p1and 10.3 percent and fruit creps 0.7
percent. Of the non-cr0p1and uses, pasture accounted for
5.7 percent, forest was 22.6 percent and other uses were 8.9

percent of the total land uses.

109
Soils and Land Use

Appendix 0 lists the acreage of each land use in each
of the SMU's in LRA 98. Several lithosequences and tape-
sequences will be discussed. The teposequences are 1.5a,
1.5b and 1.5c, 2.5a, 2.5b and 2.5c, 3a, 3b and 3c, 3/5a,
3/5b and 3/5c, 4a, 4b and 4c, and 5a, 5b and 5c. Litho-
sequences discussed are 1.5a, 2.5a, 3a, 4a, 5a, 5.3a and
5.7a, 1.5b, 2.5b, 3b, 4b and 5b, and 1.5c, 2.5c, 3c, 4c
and 5c. SMG Mc will also be discussed.

Table 77, Table 78, and Table 79 Present a teposequence
of SMG's 1.5a, 1.5b and 1.5c, reapectively. On the same
slopes, the wettest (SMG 1.5c) of these moderately fine
textured soils were the least intensively used. Total
cr0p1and was about 25 percent less than on the 1.5a or
1.5b soils, with forestry making up the difference. The
1.5a and 1.5b-soils had roughly the same total cr0p1and
percentages but cr0p1and uses were slightly different.
Fruit craps and idle cr0p1and were higher on the well
drained 1.5a soils and row craps were higher on the 1.5b
soils.

Table 80, Table 81 and Table 82 present a slightly
coarser teposequence of SMG 2.5a, 2.5b and 2.5c, respectively.
There were no great differences in the way any of the three
were used, however, pasture and forest uses increased some-
what on the wetter soils and sod craps and idle cr0p1and

decreased on the wetter soils.

110

 

 

 

 

 

 

0.00 000.0 0.000 000.00 0.000 000 .00000
0.0. 000:- 0.0 _ 000.0 0.0 0 00000
0.00 000.0 0.00 000.0 0.0 0 000000
0.00 000.0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0000000
0.00 000.0 0.00 0 0.00 0.000 000 00000000 000
0.0 000 0.0 000 0.0 0 00:00
0.00 000 0.00 000.0 0.0 0 0000
0.00 000 0.00 000.0 0.000 000 00000 000
0.0 0 0.00 000.0 0.0 0 020000 00020
0.0 0 0.00 000.0 0.0 0 00000 300
R ommmho< R mMMmHO< R 0000.00.0ko mmD
Umfiohm +m Umoohm 0+0 UwUOHm m+< mmmmMHU wQOHm
0.00 000.000 0.000 0mm.m 0.00 000. 0 0.000 000.000 .00000
0000 000.00 0.m0 m.0 000.mn 0.00 000.00 00:00
0.00 000.00 0. 0 000.0 .00 000.00 0.0 000.00 . 000000
0.0 000.00 0.0 000 0.0 000.0 0.0 000.m 0000000
0.00 000.000 0.00 000.0 0.00 000.00 0.00 000. 00 00000000 000
0.0 000.00 0.0 000 0.0 000.0 0.0 000.0 00000
0.0 000.00 0.0 000 0.00 000.0 0.0 000.00 0000
0.00 000.00 0.0 0 0.00 000.00 0.00 0M0.0m 00000 000
0.00 000.00 0.0 000 0.00 000.0 0.00 0 0.m 020000 000em
0.00 000.00 0.0 000 0.00 000.00 0.00 000. 0 00000 300
R 0M0000< R 000000< .\R 000000< R 000000< 00:
00000 +0 0+0 0+0 0000000 00000

.00 <m0 :0 00.0 02m :0 0000000 00°00 mo 0000:00009 0:0 000: 0200uu.00 0090B

Table 78.--Land uses and percentage of SMG 1.5b in LRA 98.

111

 

Use Acreage Percent
Row 0r0ps 51,929 34.0
Small Grains 28,086 18.4
Sod CrOps 35,740 23.4
Idle 8.455 5-5
Fruit 1,017 0.7
All CrOpland 125,227 82.0
Pasture 7.236 4-7
Forest 13.557 8-9
Other §L253 333
TOTAL: 152,772 100.0

Table 79.-~Land uses and percentage of SMG 1.5c in LRA 98.

 

Use Acreage Percent
Row Creps 23,811 21.5
Small Grains 14,552 13.1
Sod Cr0ps 15,837 14.3
Idle 7.251 6.5
Fruit 414 0.4
All 0r0p1and 61,865 55.8
Pasture 7,303 6.6
Forest 37.350 33-7
Other 4‘312 3;2
TOTAL: 110,838 100.0

112

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

o.ooH moo.H o.ooH mow .q<eoe
o.om New o.ooH mom pmnpo
o.oN mom o.o o pmmmom
o.o o o.o o mpzpmmm
o.o o o.o o unnamogu HH¢
o.o o o.o o pfisgm
o.o o o.o o mHuH
o.o o o.o o macho com
o.o o o.o o mcfimpo HHmEm
o.o o o.o o mmogo 3cm

R madmno¢ \[R mummuo< mm:
UmGOHw +m Umflohm Q+U mmmmmfio mQOHm
a.aa m . m o.ooH o o.ooH mow.n o.oofl amm.om .q<eoa
m.oH mem.: o.o mum N.nH .Hmo a.aa wwm.m gmspo
m.m mm:.H o.om mom N.nH m:m H.N afi: pmmpom
s.H «mm o.o o o.o o a.H «mm muspmmm
H.en Hmm.om o.on mom H.n“ mm:.m a.aa 5:0.0H unwamopo HH¢
a.H «mm o.o o o.o o a.H awn pwznm
m.m mom.m o.o o a.aa coo H.m m:m.« chH
.mm :mu.m o.on mom N.NH cam ~.m~ mmu.m mmouo com
N.NH :om.: o.o o 0.3“ omw a.aa m:o.: mcfiwpu HHmSm
s.Nm mmm.m o.o o e.NN oom.a a.NN Nmo.: mmouo som

R‘ mmmmuo< & mmMmho< R mmMmho¢ R mmmmho¢ mm:
g<eoe +m n+o m+< mmmmmflo wmoam

.mm <mq ca mm.N 92m cw mmwmmao macaw mo mMMpCmoumm uzm mmmz ccmquu.om manna

113

Table 81.--Land uses and percentage of SMG 2.5a in LRA 98.

 

gge Acreage Percent
Row CrOps 128,799 29.1
Small Grains 97,590 22.1
Sod 0r0ps 93,808 21.2
Idle 32.301 7-3
Fruit 1,957 0.3
All Crepland 353,955 80.0
Pasture 13,208 3.0
Forest 44,097 10.0
Other 31,121 2‘0
TOTAL: 442,381 100.0

Table 82.--Land uses and percentage of SMG 2.50 in Lra 98.

 

gge Acreage Percent
Row Crops 68,901 31.7
Small Grains 39,163 18.1
Sod 0r0ps 91,591 19.3
Idle 9,218 4.3
Fruit 919 0.2
All 0r0p1and 158,787 73.5
Pasture 9,890 9.6
Forest 31,829 14.7
Other 15,592 242
TOTAL: 216,098 100.0

114

SMG's 3a, 3b and 3c, a slightly coarser toposequence
is presented in Table 83, Table 89 and Table 85, respect-
ively. Note that the 3c soils had significantly less
cropland than the better drained soils. Note, also, that
on similar slopes, the well drained soils were somewhat
more intensively used. Row crops and small grains were
more common on the 3b soils even though the total cropland
was higher on the Be soils.

Table 86, Table 87 and Table 88 present a tepo-
sequence of two—storied soils. These are SMG's 3/3a,
3/5b and 3/5c, respectively. Notice the similarity
between each of the SMG's here and its single-storied
counterpart (SMG 3a, 3b and 3c, respectively). Again,
the well drained soils were most intensively used and
the poorly drained soils were by far the least intensively
used. Row crops and small grains were most common on
the somewhat poorly drained soils and other cropland uses
were most common on the well drained soils. Forests
increased in percentage on the wetter soils. Pastures
were least abundant on the well drained soils and equally
common on the wetter soils.

Table 89, Table 90 and Table 91 present a coarser,
single-storied toposequence of SMG's 9a, 9b, and 4c,
respectively. Total cropland declined as drainage
became wetter, as did most cropland uses. Row crops,
however, were at a maximum percent on the somewhat poorly
drained 9b soils, as was pasture. Forest lands increased

in percentage as drainage became wetter.

115

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

o.ooH em .a« o.ooe N.N o.ooH a:w.m .q<eoe
wimwl mwm.m m.: we :.ma mum Monpo
m.wH ‘ mmm.m e.NH mm:.m o.o o emmpom
a.aa wma.o n.o oeo.n o.o o waspmmm
o.oN mom.m o.na eem.m: o.Hm nam.m ecmaaoeo HH<
o.o o o.o o o.o o passe
m.m eHe.H m.me NH:.HH a.aa ems oHeH
n.NH oea.N a.aa moo.mH w.oe mm:.H mmoeo com
m. mmo.H N.nH mmn.ofi o.nH Hem manage HHMEm
N.e Hem e.eH Hoo.n e.n saw maoso 30m
R ammoho< R. madmaod R muncho< om:
vopoho +m cocono n+0 coconm m+¢ mommmao macaw
o.ooH «ma.onm o.ooH amm.om o.ooH o::.mom o.ooH mm .mm .q<eoe
m.m www.mm o.oH mmo.m. n.oH moo.mm H.m mom.nm “expo
e.NH mmm.omfl n.nm mam.aa w.mH mofi.mm o.o mw:.an pmmeom
0.: :mH.:: «.NH on.m N.o «mm.ma w.m www.ma manpmmm
a.aa aom.oma o.om om.: n.3w omm.mmH n.om :ma.m~m ocmaaopo Ade
m.o o:m.m o.o o o.o mam.fi e.o mmm.m passe
e.NH mam.wae a.aa mmm.~ a.aa nnm.mm m.oH awm.ea mHeH
H.nN o~u.mm~ m.: one H.nN as .m: 5.0m omo.oafi macho com
o.nH Hne.m H o.e cam m.OH em .Hm a.aa mam.ea manage HHmEm
o.nm www.mmm o.o can m.oa mum.mm a.aa mam.msa macho 30m
R ommmho< R, owmoho< R manono¢ \R madmno< on:
q<eoe +m n+0 m+¢ mmmmmao macaw

.mm «ma sfl mm 02m CH mommmao macaw mo omMPsoonmm was new: ocmAsn.mm magma

116
Table 84.--Land uses and percentage of SMG 3b in LRA 98.

 

flse Acreage Percent
Row Creps 29,454 32.8
Small Grains 16,262 18.1
Sod Cr0ps 18,517 20.6
Idle 4,688 5.2
Fruit 0 0.0
All Cropland 68,921 76.8
Pasture 2,751 3.1
Forest 12,100 13.5
Other 55222 656
TOTAL: ‘ 89,698 100.0

Table 85.--Land uses and percentage of SMG 3c in LRA 98.

 

flge Acreage Percent
Row CrOps 6,967 11.8
Small Grains 5,825 10.6
Sod Cr0ps 5,039 9.2
Idle 6,919 12.6
Fruit 0 0.0
All CrOpland 24,245 99.1
Pasture 5,232 9-5
Forest 23,179 92.2
Other 2129.2 L_+._g

TOTAL: 54,951 100.0

117

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

a.aa we .mm o.o0H H .am a.aa Hmm.H .qeeoe
w.oa nwmam. n.oH a: cam- o bmspo
m.mm owm.a H.Hm www.mH m.eH 0mm pmmeom
.aH som.w o.oH nme.m o.o 0 message
5.H: mmo.:« m.mm emn.am o.nm mem.H ecmamoeo HH<
o.o o o.o mmn o.o o passe
e.eH Nem.s H.mH NNR.HH o.o o maeH
N.HN HNH.e e.nN Nen.NN e.n: 0mm macho sow
s.n mmo.H e.HH mmm.oH m.mm we: manage Hamsm
H.n mmo.H o.e Hm~.o H.mH mom macho 30m

R ommouo< R1, ommono< R?» muncho< mm:
wovouo +m cocopo n+0 vmoopm m+< mommmao macaw
o.ooH moo.oma.e o.oe“ mmm.mm o.oo« mmN.anm o.ooH mmfi.soe .q<eoe
m.m mmm.:m ohm . o: m o.o o:m.mH N.N 0mm.om amnpo
N.eH mmm.mofl a.NN mam.cm N.HN New.mm m.m mam.em pmmeom
o.e aflo.mm m. moo.mH m.m N e.NN o.e Ho.mm waspmmm
a.aa www.mflm a.aa mma.n e.Nw N «.maa o.Hm neo.mmm ecmaaono HH<
n.o aoo.m o.o o o.s m:m.m m.o man.m wanna
«.mfi mme.oma m.m eme.e e.eH mmn.oe e.NH Ham.mm mHeH
n.3m oma.emm e.n omc.~ o.em mHH.mw m.mm mmn.mma macho com
N.Ne om:.oma a.H saw o.o emo.om e.eH oom.HoH manage HHmEm
n.om mmm.m m :.o mom n.Ne :NH.:m e.nN N:H.Nma macho 30m

R mmmmho< R mWfloho< R mmmmhodw R demho< mmD
q<eoe +m n+0 m+< mmmmmao macaw

.m¢ ¢mq CH mm\m aims“ mommmao omoam mo ommpcoohom ucm moms unmanu.om manna

Table 87.--Land uses and percentage of SMG 3/5b in LRA 98.

118

 

Use Acreage Percent
Row Cr0ps 29,311 29.3
Small Grains 12,599 15.2
Sod CrOps 17,893 21.6
Idle 8,353 10.1
Fruit 0 0.0
All CrOpland 63,156 76.2
Pasture 6,085 7.3
Forest 9.939 12.0
Other 35253 955
TOTAL: 82.933 100.0

Table 88.--Land uses and percentage of SMG3/5c in LRA 98.

 

Egg, Acreage. Percent
Row 0r0ps 21,893 22.2
Small Grains 8,526 8.7
Sod CrOpS 10,208 10.4
Idle 8,347 8.5
Fruit 0 0.0
All 0r0p1and 98,924 49.7
Pasture 6,970 7.1
Forest 34,220 34.7
Other 85387 855
TOTAL: 98,501 100.0

119

 

 

 

 

 

 

a.aa mom. H o.ooH emo.mm o.ooH mmm.~ .A<eoe
m.N wo~.H m.: new.H o.o o emcee
H.am 0mm.m a.Hm Hmm.m 5.H: moo.H pmohom
m.mm on. o.nH eoa.m o.o o waspmmm
o.o: mma.m m.mm NRH.NN «.mm Hm:.H ecmHgobo HH<
e.o o o.o o o.o o eHsem
m.mm mmm.: N.em ao~.m m.mm Hm:.H mHeH
n.oH mms.H H.nN emm.m o.o o maoeo com
e.H mom n.n m~:.H o.o o mcHMbo HHmEm
o.o o N.s mmn.m o.o o macho zom
7R owmmho¢ ,R oMMmho< ,R ommono< mm:
fimcohm .Im 60.0on n+0 Uofiohm muw mommeO mQOHm
H.ooH oea.Nmm o.o0H emn.eH o.ooH m m.m H o.ooH oo .mmm “gages
N.n mew.H: o.o m:; .: oIN-_ omm.Hw nqma; QMH.NM- emcee
n.om mom.mHH n.om omH.:H m.m~ mHm.m: H.mH mom.me pmmbom
m.m omH.Hm o.e new e.s som.HH H.o meH.mN enzymes
o.no mm:.oam e.eH 2mm.m H.mm oea.Nm m.Hs wme.mmm ocmHaoeo HH<
n.o meo.: o.o o e.H HNH.N m.o mmm.H pHsam
N.eH on.:m e.oH mam.H :.mH HHo.o~ m.mH mam.mm mHeH
e.om ama.mHH N.H mom m.om moo.Hm n.Hm nmm.oa macho com
n.oH waa.mm o.o o m.m maa.mH n.NH ome.me mcHMbo HHmEm
o.oH mm~.mm e.N em: n.oH a:o.oH s.om emo.es macho som
7R mmmoao< R ammono¢ rwv wwwoho< mu mwm890< mm:
q<eoa +m n+0 m< mmmmmHo mQOHm

.mm «mg a“ a: 02m :fi mommmao mmoam mo mmmpsoomon cum moms ccmqan.om wands

120
Table 90.--Land uses and percentage of SMG 9b in LRA 98.

 

Use Acreage Percent
Row CrOps 98,535 27.6
Small Grains 19,667 11.2
Sod Crops 29,107 16.5
Idle 18,937 10.8
Fruit 0 0.0
All CrOpland 116,296 66.0
Pasture 19,629 11.1
Forest 32,803 18.6
Other 2‘441 5:3_
TOTAL: 176,121 100.0

Table 91.--Land uses and percentage of SMG 4c in LRA 98.

 

flge Acreage Percent
Row 0r0ps 17,145 19.8
Small Grains 5,176 4.5
Sod CrOps 11,972 10.3
Idle 7.735 6.?
Fruit 0 0.0
All Cropland 92,028 36.2
Pasture 11,987 9.9
Forest 57,930 50.0
Other 9553;_ 352

TOTAL: 115.977 100.0

121

The coarsest textured tOposequence, SMG 5a, 5b and 5c is
presented in Table 92, Table 93 and Table 94, respectively.
The poorest drained member (So) was the least intensively used,
with total cr0p1and accounting for only 38.3 percent and
forests accounting for 52.9 percent. The other two members
have similar, but slightly higher cr0p1and percentages.
Cropland uses varied widely in their response to changing
drainage. Row craps, for example, were at their maximum
percentage on the 5b soils. Small grains were at their
minimum percentage on the 5b soils. Sod crops decrease in
percentage with increasing wetness and idle cropland
increased in percentage with increasing wetness. Pasture
1and, although quite low in percentage, was highest on the
5b soils. Forest land was at the lowest percentage on the
5b soils, slightly higher on the 5a soils, and much more
common on the 5c soils.

There are three different lithosequences presented
here, one for each of the drainage classes. The well
drained lithosequence.(SMG's 1.5a, 2.5a, 3a, 4a, 5a, 5.3a
and 5.7a) is presented in Tables 77, 80, 83, 89, 92. 95 and
96, respectively. Total cr0p1and was at a maximum in SMG
2.5a, as were small grains. Row crops were similar in
percentage for the 1.5a, 2.5a and 3a soils and then
declined on the coarser textured soils. Sod craps increased
from the 1.5a to the 2.5a and again to the 3a soils, and
declined on the coarser textured soils. Idle cr0p1and was

at a maximum on the 4a soils, as was pasture land. Forest

122

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

o.ooH Hm .H o.c0H mHH.e o.ooH amm.H .qeaoe
m.wH NHmz N.m so: m.m emH sense
a. m mam.H a.aa see.N n.Nm neo.H seesaw
o.o o s.n mos o.o o museums
o.o o N.en HHm.e «.mm one essHeoso HH<
o.o o o.o o o.o o pHssa
o.o o e.sm Hme.m «.mm emu eHeH
o.o o o.o ems o.o o maoso eom
o.o o o.o ems o.o o msHesu HHesm
o.o o n.NH mam o.o o macho 30m
R mummpo< R, mummpo< R. MMMmao< mm:
GmUOHm +m Umfiohm 9+0 vaOHw m< mmmmmfio mQOHw
o.ooH mem.mHH o.oo emm.m o.OOH mmo.m~ o.ooH mHN.Hm .qeeoe
m.o nHe.s o.o o a.H mm: aim Nam.o sense
o.ms msm.mm s.Hm mmm.~ o.s: mNH.oH o.ms we .om pmesom
m.m mom.o n.o nmm e.mH Hmm.e m.m mmo.m esspmsm
H.Ne mme.me H.NH eHe m.mm mem.m m.ee msH.om essHaoso HH<
o.o o o.o o o.o o o.o o pHssa
m.mH eee.mH e.n mom n.n New.H H.mH emo.oH eHeH
m.mH mHm.oH H.o mHm e.eH mmm.m e.eH wmm.HH meoso com
m.w mme.a o.o o m.m mmo e.n mme.w msHsso HHssm
o.m oeN.eH o.o o N.e NHH.N e.n oHa.n macho sex
R mmmmho< R demho< R mummwhodw m“ mmVMmho¢ mmD
geeoe +m n+0 m< mmmmsHo emeHm

.mm <mq aw mm 02m CH mommmao omoam mo swapsmohom was new: usmAuu.Nm magma

 

123

 

 

o.ooH Hmm.m H .qseoe
H.n «Mm.w sense
e.Nn mm .sm passes
e.n emo.o enzymes
a.aa mom.mw essHeosu HH«
«.0 mm sHssa
e.eH oeH.em eHeH
n.o eHe.oH macho sew
e.n nme.e msHsso HHsEm
n.o www.mH meoso gem
PConmm demho¢ mmD
.mm <m‘H Ea ow 62m .Ho wmeCmoth Una mmmfi UGNHII.¢¢ wHQmB
a.aa mmo.mm o.ooH mmm o.ooH mHa.mm .geeoa
m.m s o.o o ssm _ e sespo
e.n: Hem.mm o.ooH mom n.Ne mom.om pmesom
e.s mma.m o.o o m.e mms.n esspmsm
N.n: mmm.om o.o o e.n: mmm.wm essHaoso HH<
s.o mom o.o o s.o mom pHssm
o.nH mem.mH o.o o o.oH mem.mH eHeH
n.n ~H~.o o.o e n.n «Hm.m meeso com
e.n smm.s o.o o e.n emm.s msHsso HHssm
e.eH eme.mH o.o o e.eH eme.mH macho gem
R, mummno¢ R ommmpo< 1R onmho< mm:
H<Boe Umcoho md m< mommmau onHm

.wo <mA aw

an 02m aw mommmao macaw mo owmpsmohom

cam now: UCmQIu.mm mamas

124

 

 

 

 

o.ooH on.n o.ooH ns.om o.ooH mnm.n .qeaoe
m.wH men.H o.nH mHm.m ninH so: sespo
e.sw mm:.m n.Nm oom.HH n.n: mms.H pmeeom
s.N mom 0. 0mm n.n dma baseman
N.eH nce.H H.nN Hno.w n.nn HoH.H eeeHeoso HH<
o.o o o.o o o.o o pHssa
e.NH omo.H e.eH HmH.e n.nn HoH.H eHeH
N.n nee H.n one o.o o maoso com
o.o o H.e mnm o.o o msHsso HHssm
o.o o e.N eHs o.o o macho 30m
R mWMonoa R mmmoao< R mmmopo< om:
Umfiohm ...m Umvohm n+0 vocohm m< mmmmwdo mQOHm
n.nn mm .onm o.ooH n .om o.ocH an.n o.ooH amo.ea .qaeoe
quH wnH.Hn N.n Nmqu= s.N nwm.e n.HH oHo om sense
e.nn emn.nnH o.Hm em.oH s.nn mno.sn n.n: eeH.mn passes
N.N one.o o.H Hm s.N soa.H e.N Hen.n esssmsa
o.nn nos.nn N.n Hem.H o.on oen.NN o.nn men.em eseHeoso HH<
n.o noe.m o.o o n.N enn.H n.o moo pHssm
H.NH mmm.nn N.n oeo.H m.mH mmn.HH N.n oeo.nH eHeH
n.oH sen.em o.e Hmm s.o n «.3 o.nH one.nm macho com
n.n nmm.HH o.o o n.N mom.H e.e oHn.n msHesu HHsSm
n.o www.mH o.o o e.e Noe.m e.n non.nH meoso gem
R GMMGHQQ R mmmmhodw R mflmmhod R mmmwho< mm:
asses +m n+0 . ma memmsHo esmHm

.mm<mq CH mm.no£m an mommmao macaw mo mmmpsoohma cam moms vanqun.mm manna

125

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

o.ooH nHw.n .qeeoe
o.o o sense
o.ooH nHw.n pmesoa
o.o o baseman
o.o o essHeoso HH<
o.o o pHssm
o.o o eHeH
o.o o mmoho com
o.o o msHssu HHssm
o.o o mmono 30m
R ommopoa mm:
cocomo m< mommmao oaoam
c.00H an.mn o.ooH omm.n H.ooH NHa.nm o.ooH HHn.em .q<eoe
H.N nnm.H o.o o e.N new n.N one sense
H.Na nnH.me o.nn one.n n.nw an.nH n.Ne Hnn.nH pmesom
n.o emH e.n emH o.o o o.o o enzymes
n.nm oHe.eH o.o o e.nn onn.a N.nm one.o eseHsoso HH<
o.o o o.o o o.o o o.o o pHssm
n.n owe.n o.o o o.oH omn.~ n.oH oen.N edeH
n.o one.n o.o o s.n oHn.m H.e omo.H macho eom
s.n onH.n o.o o n.n ooH.m n.n ono.H msHssw HHssm
n.n oHn.m o.o o e.e ono.H e.e ow~.H macho sex
R. ummoao¢ R mmmopo< R mummuo< \RW‘ mummpo¢ om:
A<eoe +m n+0 m¢ mommmao macaw

.mm <mq CH mm.m 02m CH mommmao omoam Mo ommpsmonom cam now: usmqnn.wm magma

126

land was at a minimum on the 2.5a soils and increased in
percentage as textures became coarser, particularly on
the coarsest groups.

Increased slopes had the same general effect through-
out the textural range. As slopes increased (particularly
above 18 percent) generally cropland and it's component
uses decreased and forest uses increased.

The somewhat poorly drained lithosequence (SMG‘s 1.5b,
2.5b, 3b, 4b and 5b) is presented in Tables 78, 81, 89, 90
and 93, respectively. It shows trends similar to those
found in the well drained soils. Total cropland,row craps,
grains and sod crops generally declined as soils became
coarser. Idle cropland generally increased as texture
got coarser. Pasture was at a minimum percentage on the
2.5b and 3b soils and was more abundant on the 1.5b and
4b soils. It declined in percentage on the 5b soils. Forest
land increased in percentage as textures became coarser.

The poorly drained lithosequence (SMG's 1.5c, 2.5c,
3c,“4c and 5c) is presented in Tables 79, 82, 85, 91 and
99, respectively. In general the trends were shmilar to
those of the somewhat poorly drained lithosequence. Total
cropland, row crops, grains and sod crops were at a maximum
on the 2.5c group. They declined in percentage as texture
became coarser. Forest land roughly increased in percentage
as texture became coarser. Pasture was at a maximum on the
3c soils and decreased in percentage on the finer and
coarser textured soils. Idle cropland showed no definite

pattern of change with changing texture.

127
Table 97 presents land use for SMG Mo. Note
the low percentage for total cropland (29.6 percent), and
high percentages for forest (47.4 percent) and other uses
(19.9 percent). '

Potential Future Uses

About 63 percent of LRA 98 was used for cropland in 1967.
This was the case even though about 86 percent of the LRA
was potentially good or potentially prime farmland. Table
98 and Table 99 presents the uses of the potentially prime
and potentially good farmland, respectively. About 77
percent of the potentially prime and only about 51 percent
of the potentially good farmland was actually in cropland
uses in 1967. The LRA was, then, under-utilized relative to
cropland. As future demands for food and fiber products
increase, a considerable percentage of LRA 98 could be
shifted from non-cropland uses into agricultural production
to help fill those needs.

128

 

 

 

 

o.ooH Heo.Hen o.ooH oom o.OOH oeH.n o.ooH Hnm.wnn “fleece
e.eH ono.wmm qunl all dqdul mmm4n H.oH one.HHH sespo
s.n: oHn.omm o.ooH oom o.em mnm.H o.e: meo.nsm pmesom
e.n ono.on o.o o o.oH own n.n som.ms esspmsa
o.em nn:.neH o.o o o.o o n.sm one.neH sssHaoso HHe
H.o nHe o.o o o.o o H.o nH: pHssm
n.n non.ns o.o o o.o o n.n non.me eHeH
e.n «ms.nm o.o o o.o o H.n mms.nm maoso com
N.N nne.mH o.o o o.o o N.N nns.NH msHssu HHesm
o.e omn.on o.o o o.o o o.e www.mn macho som
R mummho< R oumoho< R oumopo< R mummpo< mm:
geeoe n+0 seesaw m+¢ m+< memmeHo eson

.mm «mg an 0: 02m 2w mommmao macaw mo owmpsmoaom csm moms camAun.nm manna

Table 98.--Use of potentially prime farmland in LRA 98.

129

 

Egg Acreage Percent
Row 0r0ps 1,003,586 26.6
Small Grains 652,321 17.3
Sod 0r0ps 875,298 23.2
Idle 339,305 9.0
Fruit 31,158 0.8
All 0r0p1and 2,901,668 77.0
Pasture 137,807 3.7
Forest 970,774 12.5
Other 252,834 658
TOTAL: 3,768,083 100.0

Table 99.--Use of potentially good farmland in LRA 98.

 

Use Acreage Percent
Row 0r0ps 423,599 14.5
Small Grains 252,905 8.7
Sod CrOps 456,653 15.6
Idle 333,190 11.4
Fruit 19,912 0-5
All 0r0p1and 1,981,254 50.7
Pasture 233,536 8.0
Forest 900,385 30.8
Other 306,082 1955
TOTAL: 2,921,257 100.0

LRA 22

Land Resource Area 99, the Erie-Huron Lake Plain is
located along the eastern coast of Michigan's Lower Penin-
sula from mid-state southward (Figure 1). The total inven-
tory acreage was 9,229,167 which was 13.6 percent of the total
Michigan inventory acreage.

The area is characterized by broad, large, flat, lake
and till plains. The dominant land use in 1967 was crop-
land, with row craps being found on about one-third of all

the lands in the area.

 

Table 100 lists the acreage of each SMG in the LRA and
its percentage of the LRA. Fine textured soils (SMG's 0c,
1a, 1b, 1c, 1.5a, 1.5b and 1.5c) accounted for 24.9 percent
(1,030,923 acres) of the LRA, medium textured soils (SMG's
beginning with a 2 or a 3) accounted for 93.0 percent
(1,816,159 acres) of the LRA, and coarse textured soils ac-
counted for 26.9 percent (1,139,958 acres). Organic soils
occupied 2.9 percent (99.954 acres) of the LRA, and alluvial

130

Table 100.--SMG’s,

 

SMG Acreage
00 9,263 0.2
1a 4,902 0.1
lb 102,087‘ 2.4
10 112,313' 2.7
1-5a 83.755 2-0
1.50 991,189 10.9
2.5a 168,709 4.0
2.5a-s 2,573 0.1
2.5b 539,786 12.8
2.5b-a 217 tr.
2.5b-s 97,662 2.3
2.5b-CS “.201 001
2.5c 987,214 1.5
2.5c-c 71,118 1.7
2.5c-s 92,739 1.0
3a 44,271 1.0
3b 13.32? 0-3
3b-s 1,738 tr.
3c 3,498 0.1
3c-s 10,546 0.2
3/1c 59.798 1.4
3/23 30.735 0.7
3/2b 130,153 3.1
3/2c 3 60,732 1.4
3/fi1g,202 0.:
3 1 . 3 0-
3/5b 9.853 0-2
3/ Ra 2,530 0.1
g/Rbc 220 tr.
58,099 1.9
4b 125,405 3.0
tr. = trace - less than 0.1

their acreage, and percent of LRA 99.

 

SMG Acreage
4c 63,605 .
9/1a 217 .
9/1b 779760 108
4/1c 11,079 0.3
9/2a 16,232 0.
4/2b 138,942 3.3
9/2b- -s 10,827 0.3
4/2c 69,984 1.7
9/20— —c 6,556 0.2
5a. 13,518 0.3
5b 192.357 3-
Sb-h ' 98 0 02
50 212, 15 5.0
5c-a 8,117 0.2
5/2a 21,556 0.3
5/2b 58.610 1.
5. 3a 90,407 2.1
5.7a 2,179 0.1
L-2a 22,959 0.5
L-2c 95.787 2-3
L’Li'a 1 g 749 tr.
L-LI’C 1 '018 tre
L-Mc 652 tr.
Mc 46,115 1.1
Mc-a 3,0 8 0.1
M/1c 2,0 4 tr.
M/ac 19,414 0.5
20,616 0.5
m/mc 8,227 0.2
Gbc 2,248 0.1
Misc 0 4

. 18,261
TOTAL:9,22 ,1 7

O

O

132
soils occupied 2.9 percent (122,160 acres) of the LRA. The
remaining 0.5 percent (21,009 acres) was gravelly soils, non-
soil materials and unidentified acreage.

Well drained soils occurred on 13.8 percent (582,286 acres)
of the LRA, somewhat poorly drained soils occurred on 41.3 per-
cent (1,793,723 acres) of the LRA, and poorly and very poor-
ly drained soils occurred on 99.5 percent (1,879,393 acres)
of the LRA.

Slopes were overwhelmingly flat with 96.5 percent
(4,075,907 acres) of the LRA occurring on land with gentle
slopes. About 3.1 percent (130,998 acres) of the LRA had
moderate slopes and the remaining 0.9 percent (17,812 acres)
had steep slopes.

Potentially prime farmland accounted for 67.7 Percent
(2,860,091 acres) of the LRA. Potentially good farmland
accounted for an additional 25.0 percent (1,055,285 acres).

No unique farmland occurred in LRA 99 in 1967.

Land Use

Cropland accounted for 72.5 percent of LRA 99, Table 1.
Row crops accounted for about one-third (35.0 percent),
16.4 percent was small grains, 13.1 percent sod cr0ps,
7.6 percent was idle cropland and 0.3 percent was fruit
crops. Pasture accounted for only 2.9 percent, forest accounted
for 18.2 percent and other uses accounted for the remaining

6.5 percent of the land in this LRA.

133
Soils and Land Use

Appendix H lists the acreage of each land use in each
SMU in LRA 99. Five SMG's each made up at least 5 percent
of LRA 99. These were 1.5b, 1.5c, 2.5b, 2.5c and 5c. Also
discussed are SMG's 1b, 1c, 2.5a, 3/2b, 9b, 9/2b and 5b.

Table 101 and Table 102 present the uses of SMG's
1b and 1c, respectively, a toposequence. The poorly drained
member (1c), was more intensively used than was the somewhat
poorly drained member (1b). The percentage of cr0p1and
was over 10 percent higher on the poorly drained 1c soils.
This was mostly due to the greater percentage of row crops
found on the 1c soils.

Slightly coarser textured soils with the same drainage
classes (1.5b and 1.5c, Table 103 and Table 104, respect-
ively) were more even in the intensity of their cr0p1and use
(about 85 percent), but row craps were more common on the
somewhat poorly drained member and idle cr0p1and was more
common on the poorly drained member of the t0posequence.

SMG's 2.5a (Table 105), 2.5b (Table 106) and 2.5c
(Table 107) form a more complete, slightly coarser tex-
tured t0posequence. Little differences existed between the
use of the 2.5b and 2.5c soils. The 2.5a soils had a higher
percentage of sod cr0ps and slightly lower percentage of
row cr0ps than the more poorly drained 2.5c soils.

$10pe differences were more important than drainage

differences on the loamy soils. The total percentage of cr0p-

139
Table 101.--Land uses and percentage of SMG 1b in LRA 99.

 

Ugei Acreage Percent
Row Cr0ps 33,054 32.4
Small Grains 19,959 14.7
Sod Cr0ps 12,965 12.7
Idle 13.928 13.6
Fruit 1,125 1.1
All Cr0pland 76,031 74.5
Pasture 5.636 5-5
Forest 16,710 16.9
Other 3,1519 3_._6
TOTAL: 102,087 100.0

Table 102.--Land uses and percentage of SMG 1c in LRA 99.

 

Uge Acreage Percent
Row Cr0ps 53,207 47.9
Small Grains 14,969 13.3
Sod Cr0ps 12,970 11.5
Idle 15.351 13-7
Fruit 0 0.0
All 0r0p1and 96,992 85.9
Pasture 492 0.9
Forest 12,278 10.9
Other 35193 258
TOTAL: 112,313 100.0

135
Table 103.--Land uses and percentage of SMG 1.5b in LRA 99.

 

Uge Acreage Percent
Row Cr0ps 145,912 52.9
Small Grains 55,301 19.9
Sod 0r0ps 33,902 12.0
Idle 8,598 3.1
Fruit 153 0.1
All 0r0p1and 242,866 87.5
Pasture 3,726 1.3
Forest 14,239 5.1
Other 161523 659
TOTAL: 277,420 99.9

Table 109.--Land uses and percentage of SMG 1.50 in LRA 99.

 

Uge Acreage Percent
Row 0r0ps 194,520 49.1
Small Grains 92,036 20.9
Sod Cr0ps 59,066 12.3
Idle 28,122 6.4
Fruit 195 0.1
All Cropland 368,939 83.6
Pasture 8,139 1.8
Forest 38,312 8.7
Other 255196 558
TOTAL: 441,186 99.9

136

 

 

 

 

 

 

n.nn mmm o.ooH Hon.m .q<eoe
nenn mm n.N Hum servo
o.o c o.o 6 season
n.nn nmm o.e o esssmse
n.nn nmm n.Ne onw.a essHaoso HH<
o.o o n.oH enm pHssa
o.o o N.n one eHeH
o.o o N.mm :Nm.H mmoho com
o.o o N.nm see.N msHssw HHssm
n.nn nmm e.nN mnn.~ meoso gem
R mmmmhodw R mummhodw mmD
Umflohm ...m vmvohm 9+0 mmmmmHO mQOHm
e.ooH noe.an o.ooH con.H o.ooH nom.nw o.oOH mmeamHH .qseoe
n.o mmn4oH o.oN mmn e.n on: m H.o Nnn.m servo
n.n weo.n n.nn Hnn o.o nea.m o.e mns.s pmesoa
n.H NNn.m o.o o n.N ono.H H.H sem.H esspmse
e.sm Hmn.esH e.eH omm n.nn omn.nn n.nn can.nn eseHeoso HH<
n.o nee.H o.o o n.o eHN N.o ems eHssm
e.o meN.HH o.o o e.NH swe.n .s neo.n eHeH
m.em mHm.He e.eH 6mm e.nN omn.HH m.em snm.nm maoeo com
N.NN eee.sn o.o o n.NN ~m~.oH e.NN enH.nm msHsso HHssm
e.Nn so:.nn o.o o N.nm oenAHH e.on eHn.He maoso 36m
R mmmmhodw R mmmwho¢ R mflwmhodw R demho< mm:
qeaoe +m n+0 m+< mmmmeHo eQOHm
.ma ¢mA cw mm.m 02m an mommmao macaw mo owm#:oohoa can moms ccmqua.moH manme

137

Table 106.--Land uses and percentage of SMG 2.5b in LRA 99.

 

Uge Acreage Percent
Row 0r0ps 212,126 39.3
Small Grains 133,589 24.7
Sod Crops 92,622 17.2
Idle 31.590 5-9
Fruit 1,447 0.3
All 0r0p1and 471,369 87.3
Pasture 11,025 2.0
Forest 20,656 3.8
Other 365132 618
TOTAL: 539.787 99.9

Table 107.-—Land uses and percentage of SMG 2.50 in LRA 99.

 

Use Acreage Percent
Row CrOps 199,437 40.9
Small Grains 101.975 20.9
Sod CrOps 87,044 17.9
Idle 15,896 3.3
Fruit 236 tr.
All Cropland 404,588 83.0
Pasture 19,067 2.9
Forest 43,510 8-9
Other 255Q9§ 5;;
TOTAL: 487,213 99.9

tr. = trace - less than 0.1

138

land is similar for the gentle and moderate lepes but the
percentage of row crOps declined by over 10 percent and idle
cr0p1and increased by about 8 percent between the gentle and
'moderate slapes. No significant acreage occurred on the steep
slapes.

Table 108 and Table 109 present the land use for
SMG's 3/2b and 9/2b, respectively. These groups differ chiefly
in texture of the overlying material. SMG 3/2b has sandy
loams over loams to silty clay loans and SMG 4/2b has loamy
sands over loams to silty clay loams. Both are somewhat
poorly drained. The 3/2b soils were more intensively used
with 84.7 percent in farmland uses. The 9/2b soils had
only 69.1 percent in farmland uses. Row craps were prim-
arily responsible for this difference, accounting for 46.2
percent of the 3/2b soils and only 31.5 percent of the 4/2b
soils. Forest land was more common on the 4/2b soils.

Soils in SMG 9b (Table 110) were used more similar
to those in SMG 3/2b and finer, not SMG 9/2b. Each use
differs by no more than a few percent between the 9b soils
and the 3/2b soils.

Soils in the coarsest tOposequence were the least
intensively used. The uses of SMG 5b are presented in
Table 111, and uses of 5c soils are presented in Table 112.
Idle cr0p1and accounted for a similar percentage of both
SMG's and all other cr0p1and and pasture uses were higher on
the 5b soils than the 5c soils. Forest accounted for over

two-thirds of the use of the 5c soils and only about half

Table 108.--Land uses and percentage of SMG 3/2b in LRA 99.

139

 

Use Acreage Percent
Row CrOps 60,074 46.2
Small Grains 22,751 17.5
Sod CrOps 15,767 12.1
Idle 10,175 7.8
Fruit 1,958 1.1
All CrOpland 1110.225 84.7
Pasture 1,495 1.1
Forest 10,188 7.8
Other 85299 7553
TOTAL: 130,153 99.9

Table 109.--Land uses and percentage of SMG 4/2b in LRA 99.

 

Use Acreage Percent
Row CrOps 43.797 31-5
Small Grains 17,066 12.3
Sod Crops 24,253 17.5
Idle 10,530 7.6
Fruit 386 0.3
All CrOpland 96,032 69.1
Pasture 5,752 4.1
Forest 27,697 19.9
Other 95969 658
TOTAL: 138,992 99.9

140

Table 110.--Land uses and percentage of SMG 9b in LRA 99.

 

Uge Acreage Percent
Row CrOps 58,135 96.4
Small Grains 19,607 15.6
Sod CrOps 19,183 11.3
Idle 12,114 9.7
Fruit 420 0.3
All Cropland 109,959 83.3
Pasture 2,962 2.9
Forest 12,660 10.1
Other 55325, 95;

TOTAL: 125,405 100.0

141
of the use of the 5b soils.

SMG's 1b (Table 101), 1.5b (Table 103), 2.5b (Table 106),
4b (Table 110) and 5b (Table 111) form a lithosequence. All
are somewhat poorly drained and on gentle lepes. The
finest textured (1b) and the coarsest textured (5b) soils
are the least intensively used for cr0p1and. The 5b soils
were 37.4 percent cr0p1and and the 1b soils were 74.5 percent
cr0p1and. The 1.5b, 2.5b and 4b soils all had over 83 percent
cr0p1and uses occurring on them, with the 9b soils having the
least percent cr0p1and,

SMG's 1c (Table 102), 1.5c (Table 104), 2.5c (Table 107)
and 5c (Table 112) form an incomplete poorly drained litho-
sequence. The coarse textured, poorly drained soils (5c)
were least used for cr0p1and. Note that the percentage of
row crOps and idle cr0p1and decreased as the soils became

C oarser e

Poten ia F e Uses

About 73 percent of LRA 99 was used for cr0p1and in
1967. This was true even though about 93 percent of the
LRA was potentially good farmland or better. Table 113
and Table 119 present the uses that were made of the poten-
tially prime and potentially good farmland, reSpectively.
About 82 percent of the potentially prime and only 58
percent of the potentially good farmland was in cr0p1and
uses. If forest uses were changed to cr0p1and uses, there

would be 9.9 percent of the potentially prime and 31.9

142

Table 111.--Land uses and percentage of SMG 5b in LRA 99.

 

flee, Acreage Percent
Row CrOps 20,835 14.6
Small Grains 6,385 4.5
Sod CrOps 9,559 6.7
Idle 16,215 11.9
Fruit 191 0.1
All CrOpland 53,180 37.9
Pasture 4.539 3-2
Forest 70,160 99.3
Other M 1_O_&
TOTAL: 142,357 100.1

Table 112.--Land uses and percentage of SMG 5c in LRA 99.

 

Use Acreege Percent
Row CrOps 13,538 6.4
Small Grains 5,715 2.7
Sod CrOps 7,675 3.6
Idle 24,901 11.5
Fruit 0 0.0
All Cropland 51,329 24.2
Pasture 1,212 0.6
Forest 199,516 68.0
Other 155359 25g

TOTAL: 212,416 100.0

Table 113.--Use of potentially prime farmland in LRA 99.

143

 

flee Acreage Percent
Row Crops 1,179,595 91.1
Small Grains 566,527 19.8
Sod Crops 425,536 14.9
Idle 165.791 5-8
Fruit 7.505 0-3
All Cropland 2,339,954 81.8
Pasture 68,576 2.4
Forest 268,791 9.9
Other 182,220 559
TOTAL: 2,860,041 100.0

Table 119.--Use of potentially good farmland in LRA 99.

 

flee Acreage Percent
Row CrOps 263,225 24.9
Small Grains 113,852 10.8
Sod CrOps 110,909 10.5
Idle 120,264 11.4
Fruit 3,693 0.3
All Cropland 611,943 58.0
Pasture 39,716 3.8
Forest 337,056 31.9
Other 65551Q 653_
1.055.285 100.0

TOTAL:

144

percent of the potentially good farmland that could be
shifted into cr0p1and uses.

In LRA 99, cr0p1and uses were dominated by row craps
and small grains. These two uses made up the majority of
the cr0p1and uses in the potentially prime and potentially
good cr0p1and. Recent trends in agricultural production
indicate that these percentages will be even higher in the
future.

M

Land Resource Area 111, the Indiana and Ohio Till
Plain, is located in the southeast part of the Lower
Peninsula (Figure 1). The total inventory acreage was
563,199 acres, which was 1.8 percent of the Michigan
inventory acreage.

The area is characterized by undulating to rolling
till plains. Three-fourths of the land was in agricultural
production, with over 60 percent under the plow.

Soils

 

Table 115 lists the acreage included in each of the
SMG's and it's percent of the LRA. Fine textured soils
(SMG's beginning with a 1) accounted for 50.3 percent
(283,337 acres) of the LRA. Medium textured soils (SMG's
beginning with a 2 or a 3) accounted for 32.7 percent
(184,085 acres) and coarse textured soils (SMG's beginning
with a 4 or a 5) occupied 7.7 percent (42,997 acres).
Alluvial soils, organic soils and non-soil materials
occupied the remaining 9.9 percent of the LRA.

Well drained soils occurred on 98.7 percent (279,292
acres) of the LRA. Somewhat poorly drained soils occupied
22.3 percent (125,292 acres) and poorly and very poorly
drained soils occupied 28.? percent (161,326 acres). The
remaining 0.9 percent (2,189 acres) was non-soil materials.

Slopes were dominantly flat with 80.5 percent (453,458
145

196

Table 115.--SMG's, their acreage, and percentage of LRA 111.

 

 

SMG Acreage Percent SMG Acreege Percent
1a 1,870 0.4 4a 9520 1.7
lb 20,846 3.7 4b 6, 622 1.2
1c 26,037 4.6 40 2, 023 0.4
1.5a 126,429 22.5 4/lb 674 0.1
1.5b 70,106 12.5 9/2a 6,395 1.1
1.50 38,049 6.8 4/2c 592 0.1
2.5a 54,086 9.6 5a 4,147 0.7
2.5b 13,455 2.4 5b 3,268 0.6
2.5b-s 2,038 0.4 225 tr.
2.5c 21,502 3.8 5/2a 790 0.1
2.5c-s 12,013 2.1 5/2b 1,798 0.3
3a 25,081 4.5 5. 3a 6, 943 1.2
3b 790 0.1 L-2a 2, 765 0.5
3c 3,069 0.6 L-2bc 19, 667 3.5
3/1c 5.742 1.0 L-Mc 790 0.1
3/2a 1 ,892 2.8 Mo 12,382 2.2
3/2b ,708 0.8 m/ /1c 1,028 0.2
3/5a 20,323 3.6 M “a 8,470 1.5
3/5b 987 0.2 197 tr.
3/5c 9,398 0.8 M/ /mc 5,142 0.2
O

O
H

Misc. 2 18
TOTAL: 563f693' 10

tr. = trace - less than 0.1

197
acres) of the LRA having slopes less than 6 percent.
Slope classes 0 and D (6 to 18 percent slopes) accounted
for 18.2 percent (102,256 acres). The remaining 1.3
percent (7.334 acres) was occupied by soils with slepes
in excess of 18 percent.

Potentially prime farmland accounted for 65.0 percent
(365,809 acres) of the LRA. Good farmland accounted for
28.3 percent (159,273 acres). These figures indicate that
LRA 111 is particularly well suited to farmland uses.

Land Use

Cropland accounted for 77.2 percent of LRA 111,
Table 1. This includes 98.3 percent row crops, 19.2
percent small grains, 10.4 percent sod crops, 3.2 percent
idle and 1.1 percent fruit crops. Pasture accounted for
5.3 percent, forestry 13.9 percent and other uses

occupied the remaining 4.0 percent.
Soils and Land Use

Appendiin.lists.the acreage of each land use in each
SMU in LRA 111.

The only SMG's that exceeded 5 percent of the LRA
were 1.5a, 1.5b, 1.5c and 2.5a. This indicates that the
parent material for the soils of LRA 111 is moderately
fine and medium textured.

148

Table 116 breaks down SMG 1.5a by slope class and
land use. Row crops occupied 51.7 percent of the SMG
and was a similar percentage for all slope and erosion
classes up to 18 percent slepes. There was no cropland
on slopes greater than 18 percent. Small grains decreased
in percentage as slopes increased, and sod crops increased
in percentage from the gentle to the steep slopes.

Idle cropland was insignificant on the less eroded
slopes. 0n the eroded moderate slopes 13.2 percent was
idle.

Pasture and forest uses increased as slope increased
and were the only uses on the steep slopes.

Comparing Tables 116, 117 and 118 (SMG's 1,5a, 1.5b
and 1.5c, respectively ) shows that the somewhat poorly
drained soils are the most intensively used of the three
drainage classes. Row crops (on gentle slopes) increased
from about 50 percent on the well drained and poorly
drained soils to about 60 percent on the somewhat poorly
drained soils. This pattern repeated for sod crops and
total cropland. This is likely the result of the
problems of excess water in the poorly drained soils and the
mid-summer droughtiness on the well drained soils.

Table 119 breaks down SMG 2.5a by slope class and
land use. Note the differences between the uses of these
soils and the 1.5a soils. Total cropland is similar on
the gentle slopes of the two soils but the type of cropland
differs. The 1.5a soils were used more intensively, with

row crops and grains in the greatest percentages. The

199

 

 

 

 

 

c.66H mmm o.ooH HHm.m .qeeoe
o.o o n.n H sense
o.o o H.n AHm pmesom
o.ooH nnn e.n «on servers
o.o o e.nn nos.m essHaoso HH<
o.o o o.o o sHssm
o.o o N.nH new eHeH
o.o o 6.6 one macho eom
o.o o H.NH nmm mstse HHssm
o.o o n.n: nnm.n maoso sex
R, omwoho< (R oumoho< om:
cwvohm ...m UchHm Q+D mmwmmflo mQOHm
mnooH eme.mmH o.ooH onn.H o.ooH mum.nn o.ooH mmn.Hn .eeeoe
N.n! nmo. o.o o n.N mo H N.n n o servo
e.oH one. H o.on one o.nH Hs6.e H.n mee.e person
m.w HoH.n o.on one n.oH nnm.n e.n nes.m suspend
.ne nnn.ooH o.o o n.nn nnH.o~ N.en HHo.mm essHeoso HHe
n.c one o.o o o.o mom n.o nmm pHssm
H.N nwo.~ o.o o o.o enH n.H nan.H eHeH
n.n an.e o.o o e.oH nee.n n.o emw.n macho eom
a.aH oNH.mm o.o o o.oH nun.n e.Hm smn.nH msHsso HHsEm
e.Hn nHe.no o.o o o.Hn omH.mH n.nn moo.ee meoso 36m
R mMMmHO< R mwmohodw R gmho< R mflwmhodw mm:
asses +m n+6 me memmsHo macaw

.HHH ¢mu an mm.H 02m cw mommmao omon mo ommpsoonom mam mom: vcmquu.wHH Tapas

150

Table 117.-~Land uses and percentage of SMG 1.5b in LRA 111.

 

flee Acreage Percent
Row CrOps 99,691 63.7
Small Grains 12.795 18.3
Sod CrOps 5,835 8.3
Idle 0 0.0
Fruit 206 0.3
All CrOpland 63,977 90.5
Pasture 426 0.6
Forest 4,747 6.8
Other 11352. 251
TOTAL: 70,106 100.0

Table 118.--Land uses and percentage of SMG 1.5c in LRA 111.

 

Use Acreage Percent
Row CrOps 19,059 50.1
Small Grains 5,188 13.6
Sod CrOps 2,300 6.0
Idle 1.399 3-5
Fruit 0 0.0
All CrOpland 27,891 73.3
Pasture 1.709 4-5
Forest 7,212 19.0
Other 15232 353

TOTAL: 38,049 100.0

151

 

 

 

 

 

o.ooH nnH.H o.eoH an.H .qeeoe
o.o o n.oH mmH servo
o.o o o.o 0 reduce
o.ooH an.H e.om nnn esspmsm
o.o o H.no Hmn.H eseHaoso HH<
o.o o o.o o pHssa
o.o o o.o o eHeH
o.o o o.e: new macho com
o.o o o.o o menses HHsem
o.o o H.NN mm: macho gem

R oumoao< R owmouo< mm: 1
UmUOHm ...m Umcohm n+0 mmmmMHO mQOHm
o.ooH mac. n o.ooH mmn.H o.ooH nHm.mm o.ooH Nen.NN .seeoa
o.e - Nmnqm o.o o n.o nHm H n.n NHN.H servo
n.sH nn.e N.sn one o.nH NH~.n e.n Nnm.H smesom
w.m 30.: o.mm mam N.o umo.H n.: Hmo.a weapmmm
o.Ha Hnn.mn n.eH emH e.eo men.eH n.nn eHn.mH essHeoso HHe
o.o o o.o o o.o o o.o o passe
n.e mmo.m o.o o n.n nHo.H o.e neo.H eHeH
e.om onH.HH n.eH anH n.aH new. n.nm are.n macho com
e.n eeH.n o.o o e.HH nmo. N.n rHH.m seesaw HHssm
n.nn roe.nH o.e o n.nn nn~.n n.N: mma.n macho 36m

IR mmmoao< .JR, lummopo< .R, oMMohod R ommono< om:

asses +m n+0 m+< memmsHo eeon

.HHH «mg an mn.~ 02m an mommmao onoam mo mmmpcoonom use new: ocmqan.mHH manna

152
2.5a soils were not used as intensively as the 1.5a soils.

Note that sod crops and idle cropland were relatively more

important on the 2.5a soils than on the 1.5a soils.
Potential Future Uses

About 77 percent of LRA 111 was used for cropland
in 1967, even though about 93 percent of the land was
potentially good farmland or better. Table 120 and
Table 121presents the uses that were made of the potentially
prime and potentially good farmland, respectively. Note
that 82.1 percent of the potentially prime farmland was
used for cropland. About 11 percent could be shifted from
forest uses to cropland uses as demand for agricultural
products increases. The potentially good farmland was less
intensively used. Only 71.5 percent was in cropland in 1967.
About 17 percent could be shifted from forest uses into
cropland uses should there be a need.

Note that row crops and small grains made up the
majority of the cropland uses of both the potentially prime
and the potentially good farmland. With recent shifts from
general farming in the state to cash crop production even
more of the suitable farmland is likely to be shifted over

to these two uses.

153
Table 120.--Use of potentially prime farmland in LRA 111.

 

flee, Acreage Percent
Row CrOps 177,050 51.7
Small Grains 57,910 16.9
Sod CrOps 33,233 9-7
Idle 9.915 2-9
Fruit 2,899 0.8
All CrOpland 281,007 82.1
Pasture _ 11,433 3-3
Forest 37,890 11.1
Other 115919 355
TOTAL: 342,304 100.0

Table 121.--Use of potentially good farmland in LRA 111.

 

flee» Acreage Percent
Row CrOps 81.333 94,5
Small Grains 19,346 10.6
Sod CrOps 22,259 12.2
Idle 6.175 3-4
Fruit 1,979 0.8
All Cropland 130,587 71.5
Pasture 12,530 6.9
Forest 31,716 17.4
Other 11211 213

TOTAL: 182,764 100.1

5. CONCLUSIONS

Four major soil formation factors affect the distribution
of land use. These are climate, natural drainage, slope and
parent material. The general effect of each of these
factors is outlined below:

1. climate- two soil climates, mesic and frigid, are
recognized in Michigan (Soil Survey Staff, 1975). LRA's 97,
98, 99 and 111 are contained in the mesic regime, and LRA's
92, 93, 99N, 94S and 96 are within the frigid temperature
regime. On a broad scale forestry was the dominant land
use on the soils with a frigid temperature in 1967, partic-
ularly in the Upper Peninsula, and cropland was the dominant
land use on soils with a mesic temperature. In LRA 94S the
intensity of land use is intermediate between those to the
north and those to the south on comparable SMU's.

2. natural drainage- three major drainage classes are
recognized in the mineral soils, well drained, somewhat
poorly drained and poorly drained. In the northern LRA's
the well drained soils were more intensively used for
cropland. In southern Michigan on the finer textured soils,
the somewhat poorly drained soils were slightly more
intensively used than the well drained and the poorly

drained soils.‘ The medium and coarser textured soils were

154

155

slightly more commonly cropped when well drained.

3. slope- almost universally within Michigan as slope
increased, particularly above 18 percent, the percentage
of cropland and it's component uses decreased and the
percentage of forest land increased. In some cases the
moderate slopes ( 6 to 18 percent) were slightly more
intensively used than the gentle slopes. This was commonly
the case for sod crops and small grains.

9. parent material- within a LRA parent material
was usually of equal importance as slope in determining
the distribution of land use. As a general rule as parent
material became coarser textured (SMG's beginning with a
4 or a 5) the intensity of cropland use declined and
forestry became the dominant land use.

These four factors, in combination with each other
and man's activities (population distribution, proximity
to market areas etc.) determine the distribution patterns
found in land use.

Another major conclusion resulting from this study
is the realization that large amounts of potentially
usable farmland is in non-agricultural uses. Significant
acreages of each of Michigan's LRA's could be put into
agricultural production. Increased demands for agricultural
products by an expanding world population may force these
forested or idle lands into production.

Tables 122 and 123 present the 1967 use of the potentially
prime and potentially good farmland, respectively, in Michigan.
Note the significant acreage of both types of land that is

156
forested or idle and could be put into agricultural production
to help feed the future state and world population.

157
Table 122.--Use of potentially prime farmland in.Michigan.

 

 

 

Use ,Aggeage Pegeegp
Row Crops 2,560,840 26.2
Small Grains 1,523,926 15.6
Sod Crops 1,731,997 17.7
Idle 681,742 7.0
Fruit 113,321 1.2
All Cropland 6,611,326 67.6
Pasture 386,823 9.0
Forest 2,247,203 23.0
Other 533,531 555,
TOTAL: 9,778,890 100.1

Table 123.--Use of potentially good farmland in Michigan.

 

 

flee, Aegegge Percent
Row Crops 950,925 7.8
Small Grains 636,229 5.3
Sod Crops 1,041,039 8.6
Idle 790,330 6.5
Fruit 110,937 0.9
All Cropland 3,528,955 29.1
Pasture 594,578 4.9
Forest 7,901,602 61.1
Other 586,383 4&3

TOTAL: 12,111,518 99.9

6. NEED FOR FURTHER RESEARCH

The 1967 CNI still holds a wealth of information
that could be obtained with minimal effort. Conservation
treatment needs are not discussed here but could, and should
be evaluated by SMU. The relationships between LCU's and
SMU's would also be of general interest. The 1967 CNI could
also be useful in more quantitative descriptions of the
compositions of the map units of general soil maps of
Michigan. -

Another major future use of the 1967 CNI is for
land use trend projections. The CNI offers one of the
most extensive soil and land use inventory ever.made.
Data exists for 1958 and 1967 and is at the time of this
writing being prepared for 1981 or 1982. Even though
some definitions and sampling procedures are inconsistent
throughout the three sample years, a great amount of land
use trend information can be obtained by comparisons

between them.

158

1.

2.

5.

63

7.

10.

LITERATURE CITED

Adams, Henery R. (1964) "The Collection of Basic Data
on Soil and Land Use Conditions',Advisory Soils 8,
United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Cone
servation Service.

Agricultural Land Subcommittee (1979) "Report to
Essential and Unique Lands Committee”, Department of
Natural Resources, State of Michigan.

Arnold, R.W., L.E. Tyler and F.F. Riecken (1960)
"Estimate of Slope Classes by Counties In Iowa”,
Proceedings of Iowa Academy of Science.

Benson, Ezra Taft (1956) Memorandum Number 1396,
National Inventory of Soil and Water Conservation Needs.

Buol, S.W., P.A. Sanchez, R.B. Cate, Jr. and M.A.
Granger (1975) ”Soil Fertility Capability Classification:
A Technical Soil Classification System for Fertility
Management", In: Soil Management in Tropical America,
North Carolina State University.

Conservation Needs Committee (1960) ”An Inventory of
Michigan Soil and Water Conservation Needs”.

Conservation Needs Committee (1968) " Michigan Con-
servation Needs Inventory".

Engberg, C.A., G.G. Hendrix, G.B. Fasken, W.W. Waterman,
W.A. Cutler, E.H. Kidder, E.P. Whiteside, J.F. Davis,
and A.E. Erickson (1963) "Recommended Standards for
Drainage of Michigan Soils", Michigan Agricultural
Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service
with Soil Conservation Service, United States Department
of Agriculture.

Cray, Robert (1981) ”The National Agriclutural Lands
Study: An Interview With Robert Gray", Journal of
Soil and Water Conservation, Vol. 36, No. 2.

Hill, Elton B. and Russell G. Mawby (1954) ”Types of
Farming in Michigan”, Special Bulletin 206, Michigan
State College, Agricultural Experiment Station,
Department of Agricultural Economics.

159

11.

12.

13.

14.

15.

16.

17.

18.

19.

20.

21.

22.

23.

160

Jenny, Hans (1980) "The Soil Resource: Origin and
Behavior”, Springer-Verlag, New York, New York.

Kellogg, Charles E. (1951) ”The Soils That Support
Us", The Macmillan Company, New York, New York.

Klingebiel, A.A. and P.H. Montgomery (1961) ”Land
Capability Classification", Agricultural Handbook
210, Soil Conservation Service, United States Department
of Agriculture.

Larson, W.E. (1981) ”Protecting the Soil Resource
Base”, Journal of Soil and Water Conservation,
V01. 36, No. 1.

Lee, Linda K. (1978) "A Perspective on Cropland
Availability”, Agricultural Economics Report 406,
United States Department of Agriculture, Economics,
Statistics and Cooperatives Services.

Lee, Linda K. (1981) ”Cropland Availability: The
Landowner Factor”, Journal of Soil and Water Conservation,
Vol. 36, No. 3.

Michigan Department of Agriculture (1975) "How Michigan
Might Save Land For Food: A Concept For Preserving
Essential Agricultural Land”.

Mokma, D.L and E.P. Whiteside (1972) "Performance of
Septic Tank Disposal Fields in Representative Michigan
Soils”, Michigan Agricultural Experiment Station
Research Report 157.

Mokma, D.L., E.P. Whiteside and I.F. Schneider (1974)
”Soil Management Units and Land Use Planning", Research
Report 259, Michigan State University, Agricultural

'Experiment Station.

MokMa, D.L. and L.S. Robertson (1976) "Soil Management
Groups: A Tool for Communicating Soils Information”,
Journal of.Agronomic Education, Vol. 5.

Mokma, D.L.,L.S. Robertson and S. Jantawat (1976)
”Soil organic Matter Levels in Corn Fields as Related
to Soil Management Groups”, Research Report 297,
Michigan State University, Agricultural Experiment
Stat on.

Mokma, D.L., N.W. Stroesenreuther and C.S. Fisher
(1980) ”Prime Farmland”.

Priest, T.w., E.P. Whiteside and W.H. Heneberry (1963)
"Use of Soil Management Groups and Related Information
in Evaluation of Farmlands and Their Utilization",
Michigan Agricultural Experiment Station Journal.

24.

25.

26.

27.

28.

29.

30.

31.

32.

33-

39-

35-

360

161

Robertson, L.S., D.L. Mokma, D.L. Quisenberry, W.F.
Meggitt and C.M. Hansen (1976) ”No Till Corn: 3
Soils”, Extension Bulletin E-906, COOperative Exten-
sion Service, Michigan State University.

Schneider, I.F. and A.E. Erickson (1972) ”Soil Limitations
For Disposal of Municipal Waste Waters”, Michigan
Agricultural Experiment Station Research Report 195.

Soil Conservation Service (1965) Conservation Needs
Memorandum 21.

Soil Conservation Service (1974) "Catalog of Conservation
Needs Inventory Tables", Advisory LIM 3.

Soil Conservation Service (1980) "Prime Farmlands”,
Attachment 1, Section II-D, Technical Guide.

Soil Survey Staff (1975) "Soil Taxonomy: A Basic System
of Soil Classification For Making and Intrepreting
Soil Surveys", Agricultural Handbook 436, United
States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation
Service.

Sommers, Lawrence M. Editor (1978) "Atlas of Michigan",
Michigan State University Press, Wm. B. Eerdmans
Publishing Company.

United States Department of Agriculture (1938) ”Soils
and Men”, Yearbook of Agriculture.

Veatch, J.O. (1953) ”Soils and Land of Michigan”, The
Michigan State College Press.

Warncke, D.D. and D.R. Christenson (1980) "Fertilizer
Recommendations: Vegetable and Field Crops in
Michigan”, Extension Bulletin E-550, Cooperative
Extension Service, Michigan State University.

Whiteside, E.P. and Don Schaner (1972) ”Michigan
Agriculture: Agricultural Land Use Trends and Future
Needs for Agricultural Land” Departments of Crop and
Soil Sciences and Resource Development, Michigan State
University.

Whiteside, E.P., I.F. Schneider and R.L. Cook (1968)
"Soils of Michigan", Extension Bulletin E-630, Farm
Science Series, Cooperative Extension Service,
Agricultural Experiment Station, Michigan State University.

Whiteside, E.P. (1981) Personal Correspondence and
discussion.

162

37. Wright (1974) ”Michigan’s Agriculture”, Extension
Bulletin 785, Farm Science Series, Cooperative
Extension Service, Michigan State University.

38. Wright, Karl T. and John N. Ferris (1981) "Michigan
Agriculture: Going into the Eighties", Cooperative
Extension Service, Michigan State University.

APPENDICES

Miscellaneous

Forest
0a

" A O 1 2

Fcrest
B 0, ,2

Small Grains
Sod Crops
Idle
Pasture
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:

C O 1 2
Small Grains
Sod Crops
Idle
Pasture
Forest
TOTAL:

D O 1 2
Small Grains
Idle
Pasture
Forest

E OTgTAL:

2
Forest

F 0 1 2
131.
Pasture
Forest
TOTALa'

E_JF%F§st

GROUP TOTAL:

92

1.2.1.2.
Sod Crops
Forest
TOTAL:

B 0, ,2
Small Grains
Sod Crops

APPENDIX A

230

959
16.29
16.7

918
1,143

163

Land Use By SMU In LRA 92

Pasture

Forest

TOTAL: .
GROUP TOTAL:

;e
A O 1 2
'_—SE;I1 Grains
Sod Crops
Forest
GROUP TOTAL:

1,5a
0 1 2
Row'Crops
Small Grains
Sod CrOps
Idle
Pasture
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:

C 0 1 2
PasEure
Forest
TOTAL:

D 0,1,2
Fcrest

E 0 2
Forest

F O 1 2

Forest

GROUP TOTAL:

1,50
A O 1 2

Forest

2,5a-a

B O 1 2
Pasfure
Forest
TOTAL:

C O 2
Forest

D 0,1,2
Sod Crops

APPENDIX A (cont‘d.)

Pasture

Forest

TOTAL:
GROUP TOTAL:

2,5a-s
A O 1 2

SmRIl Grains

Forest

B 0 1 2
Small Grains
Pasture
Forest
TOTAL:

F 0,1,2
Forest

z-1F%;§st

GROUP TOTAL:

2,5b-s
__QS%:I1 Grains

Forest
GROUP TOTAL:

2,5g-s
A 0 1'2

Forest

13:8 O 1 2
Small Grains

Sod Crops
Idle

Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:

C O 1 2
Small Grains
Sod Crops
Pasture
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:

D 0,1,2
Pasture
Forest
TOTAL:

169

208
1,290

9. 0

1,148
2.295
.943
918
230
2,066
3,214

16,023

22.—.383

428

3%
4,494

1,454
1,289
1,070
43.317
1,088
48,213

2.077
208
623

14,910_

18,233

208

8.399
8,602

E 0,1,2
Forest

F 0,1,2
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:
GROUP TOTAL:

22
B 0 1 2

£01181:

3b-a
0 1 2
. 32’2”
Forest

GROUP TOTAL:

c
0 1 2

.A
Small Grains
3(1b'
B 0 1 2
Pasture

1

A 0 1 2
Pasture
Forest

GROUP TOTAL:

3Z2%.0 8 2
I Is

Forest
GROUP TOTAL:

2132
g—QF8Fést
Forest
Q—QF8Fést

E 0 1 2

Forest

2.759

959
1,607

1,198
2,984

APPENDIX A (cont'd.)

F 0 1 2
Forest

GROUP TOTAL:
4_.

AB 0 1 2
131.
Forest
Other Rural

C TETAL:

O 2
D Pasture
0 2
3.3 Crops
Idle

Forest
TOTAL:

—.—-2?°?..

Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:
I 0,1,;
Idle
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:
GROUP TOTAL:

9a-
IB 0 1 2
SmEII Grains

Forest

. .?°?:?
mall Grains
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:

E 0 1 2

Forest

GROUP TOTAL:

‘12
13012

Forest
4(1b

A8012
:31.
Forest

GROUP TOTAL:

165

823%

“59
11.459
2 0

459

230
230
4,131
9. 591

918
2. 295
459
3.672

689

4(2b
AB 0 1 2
"'-§83‘Crops
Forest
Other Rural
GROUP TOTAL:

9Z2b-s 1
AB 0 2
131.
Forest
GROUP TOTAL:

4(2c 1
AB 0 2
Forest
5;
5; 0,1,2
crest
C 0 1 2

Forest

GROUP TOTAL:

52 AB 0 1 2

Sod Crops
Forest
Other.Rural
TOTAL:

28 0 1 2
Forest

5Z2b
AB 0 1 2

Forest

a

AB 0 1 2
SmEII Grains
Sod Craps
Idle
Pasture
Forest

0 TETAL:
0, ,2
Small Grains
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:

11,934

856
959
18

53.67
. 6 3

5 .36

629
7.991
208
8,328

APPENDIX A (cont‘d.)

D 0 1 2
Forest

GROUP TOTAL:

L—Zg
A 0 1 2
Forest
Other Rural
GROUP TOTAL:

MC-g

A—QP8Fést
M 1c
-ZLZIQP%F%st

Elie

A_9F%F%st
mi...

Oifier Rural

9;
B 0 1 2

8.3 Crops
Pasture
Fruit
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:

C O 1 2
Forest
2 9:1,2
crest
Other Rural

TOTAL:
E O 2
Forest
F 0 1 2

Forest

GROUP TOTAL:
LRA TOTAL:

166

4:31;

24,325

230

642

5.137

208

459
230
230
2,066
230
3.215
2.295
1,607
1.837
689

68

IE.

 

607,026

Miscellaneous
A 0, ,2
Forest
Other Rural
GROUP TOTAL:

a
B O 1 2

SmRIl Grains
Sod Crops
Idle
Pasture
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:

C O 1 2
Sod Crops
Small Grains
Pasture
Forest
TOTAL:

D O 1 2
Tile
Forest
TOTAL:

GROUP TOTAL:

95

A 0 1 2
Sod Crops
Idle
Forest
TETAL:

B 0, ,2*
Small Grains
Sod Crops
Pasture
Forest
TOTAL:

GROUP TOTAL:

1a
" c O 1 2
Forest

;9
A 0 1 2

'___P53¥ure

APPENDIX 3

1,312

3.862

6:411

459
1,821
2 280

33.733

1,148
636
22.336
24,120

214

655
230
230
1 2

691

230

167

Land Use By SMU In LRA 93

Forest
GROUP TOTAL:

1,5a
A O 1 2

Forest
B O 1 2
SmRIl Grains

Idle

Pasture

Forest
C TOTAL:

0 2 -
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:

E O 1 2

Forest

F 0,1,2
Forest
GROUP TOTAL:

5% ......

Forest

1,5c
A

O 1 2

SmaIl Grains

Pasture

Forest
GROUP TOTAL:

2,5a

A 0,1,2
Row Crops
Small Grains
Sod Crops
Idle
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:

B 0,1,2
Row Crops
Small Grains
Sod Crops
Idle
Pasture

933%

224
1,070
1,151
2,096

19.093
23,410
23 268

'428
23.696
“.839

2.82%
9:99
238

428
8 O

3. 2

APPENDIX B (cont'd.)

Forest
Other Rural
C TOTAL:
0 2
Row Crops
Small Grains
Sod Crops
Idle
Pasture
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:

D O 1 2
Small Grains
Sod Crops
Idle
Pasture
Forest
TOTAL:

E O 1 2
szll Grains
Sod Crops
Idle
Pasture
Forest
Other Rural
.TgTAL:

F O 2
Sod Crops
Pasture
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:

GROUP TOTAL:

3153:1i

B O 1 2
szIl Grains

Sod Crops
Forest
TOTAL:

C 0,1,2

' Sod Crops
Pasture
Forest
TOTAL:

GROUP TOTAL:

2,5a-s

A O 1 2
Forest
B O 1 2

Smfill Grains

168

1,038
,038
8.399

831
415

22 ; 25.?
32. 92

230
656

Sod Crops
Idle
Forest
TOTAL:

D 0 1 2
SmaIl Grains
Forest
TOTAL:

F 0 1 2

Forest

GROUP TOTAL:

2.51

1.2.1.2
Row’Crops

Small Grains
Sod Crops
Idle
Pasture
Forest
TETAL:

B O 2
Small Grains
Sod Crops
Idle
Forest

TOTAL:
GROUP TOTAL:

2,5b-s 1 2

Forest

.3122

A O 1 2
'_-SE:Il Grains

Sod Crops
Idle
Pasture
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:

B 0,1,2
Forest

GROUP TOTAL:

Forest
GROUP TOTAL:

2.637
461
12,628
16,382

4.378
214

APPENDIX B (cont'd.)

22

A 0 1 2

Forest
B 9E1,2

ow Crops
Small Grains
Sod Crops
Idle .
Pasture
Fruit
Forest

Other Rural
TOTAL:

0 O 1 2
Row Crops
Small Grains
Sod Crops
Idle
Pasture
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:

D 9:1,2-
mall Grains
Sod Crops
Idle
Pasture
Forest
TOTAL:

B O 2
Idle
Forest
TOTAL:

E 3,h,5
Other Rural

”ti-fit.

GROUP TOTAL:

3 0E1,2
ow Crops

Sod Crops
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:

B o 1 2
Row Crops
Small Grains
Sod Crops
Idle
Pasture

169

Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:

0 O 1 2
szll Grains
Sod Crops
Idle
Pasture
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:

D O 1 2
-__§;:Il Grains
Sod Crops

Idle
Pasture
Forest
Other Rural

E OTTTQL.

-'—§33—Crops
Idle
Pasture
Forest
TOTAL:

F 0,1,2
Pasture
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:

GROUP TOTAL:

22

A O 1 2
Idle
Forest

.TOTAL:

B 0.1.2

Small Grains
Pasture
Forest
TOTAL:

GROUP TOTAL:

flb-a

A O 1 2
Small Grains
Sod Crops
Pasture
Forest
TOTAL:

22:
221
“5“
18,317
19,216

6H2
13.970
208
14 820

1331366

691
37.092
37.783

1,613
461

7.133
20

525%
222

#80

50,014
52,031

APPENDIX B (cont'd.)

B O 1 2
SmRIl Grains
Pasture
Forest
TOTAL:
GROUP TOTAL:

22

A 051:2
l Grains

Idle
Pasture
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:

B 0 1 2
Pasture
Forest

TOTAL:
GROUP TOTAL:

1
M.

312a
0 1 2 ‘
Sod Crop

Forest
GROUP TOTAL:

2b 1
O 2
Forest

A 0,1,2
Sod Crops
Pasture
TOTAL:

B O 1 2
idle
Forest
TOTAL:

C 0,1,2
Forest

GROUP TOTAL:

a-a

A 1 2
Snail Grains

Idle

170

831
15 :32
16'680

331m

230
213

55.503

1,269
58,006

475
713
238

1,098
1:336

2%

1:277
959

Pasture
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:

B 0, ,2
Sod Crops
Forest
TOTAL:

0 0 1 2
Sod Crops
Pasture
Forest
TOTAL:

D 0 1 2 A
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:

E 0 1 2

'_-F3;3st

GROUP TOTAL:

b

A 0 1 2

"'§E:Il Grains
Sod Crops
Idle
Pasture
Forest
TOTAL:

B 0I I2
Small Grains
Pasture
Forest
TOTAL:

GROUP TOTAL:

313a
A O 1 2

_—_§E:Il Grains
Row Crops
Idle
Forest _
Other Rural
TOTAL:

B O 1 2
'——§fi:ll Grains
Sod Crops

Idle
Pasture
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:

21,233

2,3u1
30.183

851
20,701
21.552

1,060
1,490
10,089

3:177
221
8:393

221

72:99?

238
713
713
238
2.376
4,278

238
238
1,171

238
238
713
3:711
#15

5.315

210
5.72“

1,522
76.Z25
18

8#,888

APPENDIX B (cont'd.)

C 0 1 2
-__§E:Il Grains
Sod Crops

Idle
Pasture
Forest
TOTAL:

D 0,1,2
Sod Crops
Idle
Pasture
Forest
T2TAL:.

E 0 2
Sod Crops
Pasture
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:

F O 1 2

"RFEPZst

GROUP TOTAL:

i 051,2
orest

B 0'1 2 .
Forest

GROUP TOTAL:
0
.3 AB 0 1 2
Row Orops

Small Grains
Sod Crops
Idle

Pasture
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:

AB g,#,5
mall Grains

Idle .
TOTAL:

0 9:1,2
ow Crops

Small Grains
Sod Crops
Idle

Pasture
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:

171

220
22#
668
221
13.876
15.213

22#
#61
221
1#,629
15.535

22::

22::
522?;
541962

6 8
1 3, 0

2,#80

‘71:???

113.753

221

#75
696

713
1,310
1,301
2,226

##2

60.998

900
67.890

#a-g

2‘2§%:§l Grains

Sod Crops
Idle
Pasture
Forest
TOTAL:

E 0 1 2

'-_§E:Tl Grains
Idle
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:

F O 1 2
Pasture
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:

GROUP TOTAL:

AB 0 1 2

Row Crops
Small Grains
Sod Crops
Idle
Pasture
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:

0 0 1 2
Row Crops
Small Grains
Sod Crops
Idle
Pasture
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:

D 0 2
Idle
Pasture
Forest
TOTAL:

E 0 1 2
gmaIl Grains
Pasture
Forest
TOTAL:

2.2.2.2
Sod Crops

2,892

1,869
12Z'021
.35“
1h3.539

831
2,285

1,102
208
55.032
885

60.785

22#
208

21.775
22,207

208

1:15
#.3#9
“.972

#61

172

APPENDIX B (cont'd.)

Forest 10,0#1 Forest §_¥1%
TOTAL: 10,502 GROUP TOTAL: , 3
GROUP TOTAL: 242,005
#120
fig AB 0 1 2 AB 3 1 2 # 155
orest
Row Crops 208 '
Small Grains 1,Z21 53
Sod Crops 5 AB 0 1 2
Idle 210 Row Crops 3,309
Pasture 663 Small Grains 1,509
Forest 25,807 Sod Crops #,859
Other Rural 2 8 Idle 1,715
GROUP TOTAL: 29,352 Pasture 623
Forest 128,201
52 AB 0.1 2 Other Rural 1Ҥ,781
TOTAL: 997
-_—§:;11 Grains 1,306 0 0 1 2 '
Sod Crops 1, 80 Row Crops #75
Idle 75 Small Grains ##5
Pasture 1,7#8 - Idle ' #15
Forest 28,692 Pasture 208
Other Rural 831 Forest 120,618
GROUP TOTAL: , 3 33%;; Rural 12;,233
' 0
#[1b D 0 1 2
AB 0 1 2 Row Crops 1,#39
Forest 3.570 Small Grains 2 8
Sod Crops 3,236
# 2a . Idle 52
0 1 2 Pasture 1,67
d e 213 Forest 35.206
Forest 8,050 Other Rural 2,317
Other Rural 213 TOTAL: ##,679
TOTAL: 8,#76 E 0 1 2
g 0E1,2 fat. #59
orest 1,988 Forest 11,211
D 0,1,2 TOTAL: 11,670
Forest 88# F O 1 2
GROUP TOTAL: 11,357 Forest 2,3#1
# 2b GROUP TOTAL: 32 ,9
KB 0,1,2 5a-h
Small Grains 238 AB 0,1,2
Forest g,g2§ orest 1,321
GROUP TOTAL: , 3 C 0 1 2
. fiat 2:023
-/-r“ 22".. 1 2 3331: “‘1 3'32?
8
Smail Grains 1,188 D 0,1,2 '
Pasture 238 Forest 22#

GROUP TOTAL:

APPENDIX B (cont'd.)

AB 0 1 2
§oa Crops
Forest
Other Rural
GROUP TOTAL:

52:9

“—19.9522

AB 0 1 2
Sod 0r0ps
Forest
Other.Rural
GROUP TOTAL:

52

AB 0 1 2
Pasture
Forest

GROUP TOTAL:

512a. '
AB 0 1 2

§m§11 Grains

GROUP TOTAL:

5129 :
AB 0 2
33%11 Grains

Forest
GROUP TOTAL:

18 O'l'é
ow’ rops
Small Grains
Sod Crops
Idle
Pasture
Forest
Other Rural
0 TOTAL:

0 2
RoW'Crops
Small Grains
Idle

173

210
47.995
210

10.349

210
56,100
8#O

357T35

20
1# 8#6

Bio—51:

238

fig?

#67

;,221

2.128
#22
238
221
218

52,##6

3.122

58.785

1.915
88#

Pasture
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:

D 0 1 2
Forest

E 0 1 2

F Forest
0 1 2
Forest

GROUP TOTAL:

5122

AB 0 1 2

-_§6311’Gra1ns
Pasture
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:

0 O 1 2
Forest

GROUP TOTAL:

L-2 O 1 2

Row Crops
Small Grains
Sod Crops
Pasture
Forest
Other Rural

GROUP TOTAL:

L-Zg

A O 1 2
ngIl Grains
Sod Crops
Idle
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:

B 0 2
§od Crops
Pasture
Forest
TOTAL:

GROUP TOTAL:

L-#a

A O 1 2
szIl Grains

 

210

8822

92.035

134.338

#26

252733?

238

208
#28

3.115
1,263

27%?

#28

3'

3
“1:36?
21#

21#
230

22.-82%

#28

174

APPENDIX B (cont'd.)

Other Rural 21#
GROUP TOTAL: 652

L-#§ 0 1 2 ,
'——§E:Il Grains 230

Sod Crops 230
Pasture 1,070
Forest 26,186
Other Rural 221
GROUP TOTAL! 270933
235% 031 2
gm§Il Grains £38
gasture 21;
orest ’
GROUP TOTAL: 378§6
£2. '1 '
A
"9§;:§l Grains 238
Sod Crops 1,613
Pasture 2:957
Forest 554.333
Other Rural 8,220
TOTAL: 567, 1
B 0:1,;
orest 208
§_21112
Forest #28

GROUP TOTAL: 3687573

882 8m:

1.839
Forest 91,86#
Other Rural 2#O
D TOTAL: 93:5“3
O 2
Forest 2#O
GROUP TOTAL: 93,782
"(1% .
0,1,2
Forest #,920
M130
A 0 1 2
Row Crops 208
Small Grains ##O

Pasture
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:

B O 1 2

Forest

GROUP TOTAL:

"(2%

O 1 2

‘—-§E:Il Grains
Idle

Forest
Other Rural

GROUP TOTAL:
92

A O 1 2
Forest

Sod Crops
Pasture
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:

C O 1 2
"'§E:Il Grains

Sod Crops
Pasture
Forest
TOTAL:

D 0 1 2
Forest
E 0,1,2
Forest
F 0,1,2

Forest
GROUP TOTAL:

9232

B 0 1 2

Forest

0 0,1,2
Forest

D 0,1,2
Forest

E 0,1,2
Forest

F 0,1,2
Forest

GROUP TOTAL:

1,728
110,3 1

1. 3
114,550
2,862

238
238
99.250
...Eli

100,141

1,11#
3%?»
691

17,852

230

7.302
7.#9#
12,106
3.651
# 612

175
APPENDIX B (cont'd.)

g;

A O 1 2
131s 630
Pasture 210
Forest 21,h62
TOTAL: 22,302

B 0.1.2
Sod Crops 22b
Idle 868
Pasture 1,;Z7
Forest 5, 2
TOTAL! 7:511

O 1 2
asture 224
Forest #4?
D TOTAL: 671

O 2
Bod Crops 22b
Pasture 22#
£351? ‘5‘"

I
GROUP TOTAL: 5173;;
£23 1

A O 2
god Crops 224
Idle 22h
Pasture 8bO
Forest 33.481
Other Rural 210
TOTAL: 3#,979

B 1'2
Forest 2 #60

GROUP TOTAL: 32,533

 

LRA TOTAL: 5.035.532

APPENDIX C

Land Use By SMU In LRA 94N

Miscellaneous

0 1
80d Crops 630
Igorest.R 31 23,002
ther ur 2
GROUP TOTAL: 527£OE
23 1
A 0 2
god Crops 232
Idle 232
Pasture 232
Forest 232
Other Rural 2 2
TOTAL: 1, 0
B 0 1 2
8m811 Grains 7,387
Sod Crops 3,176
Idle 2,665
Pasture .402
Forest 6,016
Other Rural 687
TOTAL: 25,293
0 0 1 2
gmall Grains 232
Sod Crops 232
Forest 6,100
Other Rural 223
TOTQL: 6.791
D O
gmall Grains 232
Sod Crops 695
Pasture 232
Forest #63
Other Rural #63
E TOTAL: 2,085
O 2
Pasture ' 463
Forest 2,317
Other Rural 232
TOTAL: 3,012
F 0 1 2
BmRTl Grains 232
Pasture 927
Forest 2,5h9
Other Rural 2
TOTAL:

GROUP TOTAL:

2
o
ugfggfi

176

92

A 0 1 2
gmall Grains
Sod Crops
Idle
Pasture
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:

8 O 2
§.£I1 Grains
Sod Crops
Idle
Pasture
Forest
TOTAL:

GROUP TOTAL:

Go

-.A 0 1 2
Sn:il Grains
Idle
Forest
Other Rural
GROUP TOTAL:

1!
A 0 1 2
'___23;3st
§_Qlll§

Forest
GROUP TOTAL:

12
A 0 1 2
Forest
B O 1 2

Forest

GROUP TOTAL:
is

A O 1 2
§mall Grains
Sod Crops
Idle
Pasture
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:

no.5u1

6,698
9,268
3:707

23.037
, #4
91.n95

232
695
927

6.343

10383?

1,803

16,780

APPENDIX C (cont'd.)

B 0 1 2
forest

GROUP TOTAL:

a
B 0 1 2
god Crops
Idle
Forest
TOTAL:
0 0,1,2
Sod Crops
Idle
Forest
TOTAL:
GROUP TOTAL:

1,5b

O 1 2
BOGICrOps
Pasture
TOTAL:

B 0,1,2
Small Grains

GROUP TOTAL:

2,5a
0 1 2
80d Crops
Idle

Forest
TOTAL:

C O 1 2
-‘-§E:11 Grains

Sod CrOps
Idle
Forest
P TOTAL:
0I I2
Other Rural
GROUP TOTAL:

2,5i-s
1 2

80d Crops
Forest
TOTAL:

0 0,1,2
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:

177

231%

2, 5O

25
1:275
4,250

1:25
1.275
893

23%

1,260
1,050
2,310

27%

1,3#0
210
2,010

3.560

427
2.233

670
2.235
5.585

2,083
e

223
3.353
3.576

7.65#
232
7,886

O 0 1 2
forest
B O 1 2

Porest

GROUP TOTAL:

2,5b

A O 1 2
Pasture
Forest
TOTAL:

B 0 1 2
808 Crops
Idle
Other Rural

TOTAL:
GROUP TOTAL:

211§:%.1 2
80d Crops
Idle
Forest
TOTAL:

B 0 1 2

Porest
Other Rural

TOTAL:
GROUP TOTAL:

2,50
A 0,1,2
Sod Crops
Forest
GROUP TOTAL:
2 c-c
A 0,1,2
Sod Crops

2,5c-s
A O 1 2
808 Crops
Idle
Forest
GROUP TOTAL:

15 1 2
B 0
£03 Crops

Idle
Pasture

7:20“
1 126

W

210
1,890
2,100

1,260

223
# 612

m

630

#25
.212

2.21.13.

210
1,116

APPENDIX 0 (cont'd.)

Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:

0 0 1 2
forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:

D 9,1,2
Forest

E 9:1,2
p 011:“
Porest

GROUP TOTAL:

3a-a ~
0 1 2
Row Crops
Idle
Pasture
Forest
TOTAL:
0 O 1 2
gmzil Grains
Pasture
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:
D 0 2
Forest
E 0,1,2
Forest
F 0,1,2
Forest
GROUP TOTAL:

12:; 1 2
A 0
BmaIl Grains

Pasture

Forest
TOTAL:

B O 1 2
Porest

Other Rural
TOTAL:
GROUP TOTAL:

12
A O 1 2
forest

178

35.2#6

223
37.2“2
13.207

1,622
1#,829

3:939
2.5“9

357%

22“

1,2fi;

7.867
9,880

2 2
1.3 2
10.750

232
12.556
n.025

894

22#
27: 7

225

637
1:331
2.393

5.132
212

“27.7%"

671

1a
0 1 2
Forest

1; 0,1,2
Small Grains
Sod Crops
Idle
Forest
TOTAL:

B O 1 2
1dle
Forest
TOTAL:

GROUP TOTAL:

10
azLI'O 1 2
131s
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:
B 0,1,2

Small Grains
GROUP TOTAL:

A O 1 2
808 Crops

Pasture
Forest
TOTAL:

B 0 1 2
Small Grains
Sod Crops
Idle
Pasture.
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:

2.0.1.2
Forest

F O 1 2

Porest

GROUP TOTAL:
#a

".13 0 1 2
§m511 Grains

Sod Crops
Idle

1,85#

#63

232
,012
.202

232
232

927
33.097
927
3#.951

3 2&2

#20
210
##7
1.077

212
1:055
8.697
1,08#

16,086
1,106
28,2#O

1,262

52%

##9
13,230
5.671

APPENDIX C (cont'd.)

Pasture
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:

0 O 1 2
803 Crops
Idle
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:

9.15215
0d Crops

Idle

Pasture

Forest

TOTAL:
D O 1 2

Porest
2.2F211
orest

E O 1 2

Porest
2.21115
orest

Other Rural
TOTAL:

F 0 1 2
Porest

GROUP TOTAL:
#b

"'AB 0'1 2
Sod Drops
Pasture

Forest
GROUP TOTAL:

39 AB 0 1 2
Porest
#11a 1
AB 0 2
Porest
0 0,1,2
Forest

GROUP TOTAL:

# 11B 0 1 2
§mEII Grains

Forest
GROUP TOTAL:

212
212

13.320
:

8.3#3

232

2,;1g
O

#63

#110
AB 0 1 2
IdIe
Forest
GROUP TOTAL:

#12a
AB 0 1 2
Forest
0 0 2
Porest
D O 1 2

Forest

GROUP TOTAL:
#120

AB 0 1 2
Forest
Other Rural

GROUP TOTAL:

#120

AB 0 1 2

"‘1§it'
Forest

GROUP TOTAL:

M51301.

"'F3§3§t

5;

1211112;

Sod Crops
Idle
Pasture
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:

C 0,1,2
Idle
Pasture
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:

D O 1 2
Porest
Other Rural
TOTAL:

E O 1 2

Forest

6,283
1.352

223

m
«s

Q

..s

1,978

4.075
2,613
#38

2:705
315.053

863
1.351
159,616
1,622
163,#52
58,011
222
58.2 3
22,322

APPENDIX C (cont'd.)

P O 1 2

Porest
F 25“.:
orest

GROUP TOTAL:

522%3 O 1
"'Ifif:g

Forest

Other Rural
TOTAL:

TOTAL:

GROUP TOTAL:

AB 0 1 2
303 0r0ps
Forest
Other Rural
GROUP TOTAL:

Sb-h
AB 0 1 2
503 0r0ps
Idle
Forest

Other Rural

GROUP TOTAL:

0
AB 0 1 2

Forest

180

8,287

522%

670
50.595
51.265
31.707

227
32.152

232
20,26#

225

1,123
1,3#8

1#,768

122—.611

#57

1##,#87

682

153:326

1,#8

22
36.091
212

33.513

38,081

103.535

Other Rural
GROUP TOTAL:

512a
B O 1 2

ro-été-«éé

 

 

Sod Grops 210
2b 0 1 2
AB
BmEII Grains -2 2
Forest 2
GROUP TOTAL: ,7
in 1 2
O
303 Crops #20
Idle 223
Forest 58.783
Other Rural 69
TOTAL: 60,121
C 0 1 2
Tile 210
Forest 53.126
TOTAL! 53.335
D 0,1,2
Forest 10,361
E 0 2
Forest 11,#72
P 0,1,2
Forest 15,#O#
GROUP TOTAL: 1 O,
L-20 1
A 0I I2
Sod Crops 1,680
gastuie 2 232
ores
GROUP TOTAL: 57333
L-#a
A 0,1,2
Forest 670
Other Rural 6 0
GROUP TOTAL: 1, 0
L-#c
A 0,1,2
Forest 25.332
Other Rural 2 2
GROUP TOTAL: , 3

APPENDIX C (cont'd.)

Inns
A O 1 2
Forest
53
A O 1 2
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:

B 0,1,2
Forest
0 O 1 2

Forest

GROUP TOTAL:

MO- 1
O 2
Forest

Other Rural
GROUP TOTAL:

M119
A 0,1,2
Forest

M11§-a 1 2

Forest

M130
0 1 2
Porest
112! .
A 0 1 2
Tale
Forest

Other Rural
GROUP TOTAL:

M1!0'
0'1 2
GmaIl Grains

Forest
GROUP TOTAL:

Ga

 

A 0 1 2
Other Rural
B O 1 2

Forest

......JZ
321.920

181

20.955

318. 38
2, 71
321,009
#63

an

17 918
3,886

:

1,126
13,516
10,65#

#50
157.232

. 7

%%§:

232
12,289

2.2.112
Idle

Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:

D O 1 2
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:

GROUP TOTAL:

922 1 2

A OI ,
Forest

B O 2
30d 0r0ps
Idle
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:

GROUP TOTAL:

Ra

A 0 1 2
808 Crops
Idle
Pasture
Forest
TOTAL:

B O 1 2
Row 0r0ps
Small Grains
Sod Crops
Idle
Pasture
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:

0 0'1 2
PasTUre

, Forest
TOTAL:

D 0,1,2

Other Rural
GROUP TOTAL:

Rbc

"‘1 0‘1 2
808 Crops
Idle

Forest
GROUP TOTAL:

LRA TOTAL:

212
210
16 100

m

2.783.393

APPENDIX D

Land Use By SMU In LRA 9#S
B O 1 2

M1s0el;%geogs
, , Porest #26
Forest 1,019 GROUP TOTAL: 26,739
Other Rural 2,2:3
B TOTAL: 3,2 1_a_ A 0 1 2
0,1,2
Other Rural 619 Row Crops 2,09#
B 3,#,§ Small Grains 5,893
Other Rural 1,#72 Sod Crops 8,882
0 3H,: . Idle #,#9#
orest 39# Pasture ' 5,783
D 1 2 Fruit 639
asture 626 Forest 6,355
Forest 626 Other Rural 859
E TOTgL: 1.252 B OTOTgL: 34.999
Idle 209 Row Crops ,#90
E # Small Grains- 1 ,13#
Other Rural 18# Sod Crops 2,72#
Undetermined 56,-6113 Idle 1 , 21.6
T T : 6#,019 Pasture 3,171
- Fruit 198
Q; 1 2 10:11.81} al f”?
B 0 er ur ,O 9
808 Crops 216 TOTAL: 31,#62
Forest 216 O O 1 2
GROUP TOTAL: 1752 _'§""nan Grains 1 ,2#6
Sod Crops #17
9Q Idle 21
A 1 2 Pasture 61
asture 1, 2 Forest 2,790
Forest 1, 28 TOTAL: 5,280
TOTAL: 3,370 O 3§#:E
B 0 1 2 m l Grains 198
$03 0r0ps 1.06% D O 1 2
GROUP TOTAL: , god Crops 211
Pasture 213
99- . o 1 2 5813‘ 23?.
8
Row Crops 91 E 0,1,2
gmglé Grains g, g# F Ffrest ‘ 863
o rops ,O 7 0 2
Idle 621 Pasture 216
Pasture #,929 Forest #32
Forest 12,#36 Other Rural 20#
Other Rural 216 TOTAL: 8 2
TOTAL: 26,31# GROUP TOTAL: 7 ,27

182

APPENDIX D (cont'd.)
12

A O 1 2
Row’crops

19

Small Grains
Sod 0r0ps
Idle

Pasture
Forest

Other Rural
TOTAL:

B O 1

Row2 0r0ps

Small Grains
Sod Crops
Idle

Pasture
Fruit
Forest

Other Rural
TOTAL:

0 O 1 2
Porest

GROUP TOTAL:

A 0'1 2
Row 0r0ps

Sod Crops
Idle

Forest
Other Rural

GROUP TOTAL:

i‘ii-QR%:gOr0ps

Small Grains
Sod Crops
Idle

Pasture
Forest

Other Rural
TOTAL:

B O 1 2
Row 0r0ps

Small Grains
Sod Crops
Idle

Pasture
Forest

Other Rural
TOTAL:

183

#,872
8.757
15.097
2.536
u. 207
26.165
1.252
62, 886

1.577
2.010

C 0&1,g
ow Crops

Small Grains
Sod Crops
Idle

Pasture
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:

Q_1§211
0w 0r0ps

Small Grains
Sod Crops
Idle
Pasture
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:
D 0 2
#0 reps
Small Grains
Sod Crops
Idle
Pasture
Forest

Other Rural
TOTAL:

D 3g#,5
ow'Orops

Small Grains
Sod 0r0ps
Idle

Pasture
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:

E O 1 2
-—_§E:Il Grains

Sod 0r0ps
Pasture
Forest
TOTAL:

E 3H#,5
ow’Crops

Small Grains
Sod 0r0ps
Idle

Pasture
Forest

Other Rural
TOTAL:

5, 278
6,311
26. 955
10,837
16. 531
15.3“5
2 .749
8# .506

600
1.207
600
1.035
200
207
200
#,099

1 ,O#7
1,271
8, 616
1,# 2

16, 6#

.95
37. 505

61#
226

1 27
{123
73
'648

437
5.301

“08
1:059
2:299
2, 952
6: 718

#29
#31
#33
200

3:33;

6.693

184
APPENDIX D (cont'd.)

P 0 1 2 B 0 1 2
Sci Crops 212 Row Crops 207
Idle #16 Small Grains 218
Pasture 1,#83 Sod Crops 2,366
Forest 6.995 Idle 626
Other Rural #19 Pasture 1,985
TOTAL: 9.525 Forest 2, 53
F 3:9,: Other Rural 29
ow Crops 212 TOTAL: 2,88“
Small Grains 212 GROUP TOTAL: 53,
Sod Crops 212
Pasture 212 2,5a
Forest 1,656 A 0,1,2
TOTAL: 2,209 Small Grains #20
GROUP TOTAL: 3 9, OO Sod Crops 1,892
Pasture 1,269
Forest 1,2h7
A 0:1,;c 9 895 TOTAL: “.828
on rope , B O 2
Small Grains 5.797 Row Crops 1,687
Sod Crops 12,229 Small Grains 10,122
Idle 5,1 Sod Crops 33,168
Pasture 3,823 Idle 8,393
Forest 12,641 Pasture 15,Z78
Other Rural #23 Fruit 2, 69
3 TngL: 99,992 Forest 38,81g
0 Other Rural 2,51
Row Crops 9,967 TOTAL: 112,897
Small Grains 7,050 O 0,1,2
Sod Crops 1 ,970 Small Grains 1,899
Idle ,930 Sod Crops 8,8#5
Pasture 9,089 Idle 2,092
Forest 15,267 Pasture , 99
Other Rural 1,288 Fruit ’ 18
OTETAL' 60,096 Forest 22,463
2 Other Rural 21
Small Grains :12 TOTAL: 41,522
Pasture 23 D 0,1,2
TOTAL: 635 Sod Crops 2,109
GROUP TOTAL: 1 e 73 Idle 603
Pasture 2,070
Forest 12,581
A 0,1,2 Other Rural 1,031
Row Crops 3,772 TOTAL: 18,39h
Small Grains 3,093' D h
Sod Crops 6,252 Other Rural 213
Idle 3, 86 E o 1 2
Pasture ,691 Small Grains 212
Forest 2 ,310 Sod Crops 213
Other Rural 862 Pasture 632
TOTAL: 95,566 Forest 8,855
TOTAL: 9,912

APPENDIX D (cont'd.)

F 0 1 2
Pasture
Forest
TOTAL:

GROUP TOTAL:

_-R%:g0rops

Idle
Forest
TfTAL:

B O 2
Row Crops
Small Grains
Sod Crops
Idle
Pasture
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:

C 9:1,2
od Crops

Pasture
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:

D 0 1 2
Small Grains
Idle
Forest
TOTAL:

D 35“,:
ad Crops

E 0,1,2
Forest

E—2F%;§st

F 0,1,2
Other Rural
GROUP TOTAL:

3152

A_9_.1..2.
Row Crops

Small Grains
Sod Crops
Idle

Pasture
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:

185

408
605
1 01

1 .7

20“
619
#18
1,241

408
612
1,622
408
209
61k
197
“,070

1.976
#18

“1
202
2,511
204
216
216
636
216
626
#18

612

I5:§§7

1,017
3.457

2:299
9,104

17.972

B O 1 2
Sod Crops
Idle
Pasture
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:

GROUP TOTAL:

2,5b-s 1

2
Row Crops
Small Grains
Sod Crops
Idle
Pasture
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:
B O 1 2
Sod Crops
Idle
Pasture
Forest
TOTAL:
GROUP TOTAL:

2,5g-cs1 2

Sod Crops

o

A 0 1 2
Row Crops
Small Grains
Sod Crops
Idle
Pasture
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:

8 0,1,2
Sod Crops
Pasture
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:

GROUP TOTAL:

c-c
A 0,1,2
Row Crops

APPENDIX D (cont'd.)

Sod Crops

Forest

Other Rural
GROUP TOTAL:

2,5c-s

A O 1 2
Row’Crops
Sod Crops
Idle
Pasture
Forest
Other Rural

GROUP TOTAL:

23
5 051,2
ow Crops
Small Grains
Sod Crops
Idle
Pasture
Fruit
Forest
TOTAL:
8 9:1,2
ow Crops
Small Grains
Sod Crops
Idle
Pasture
Fruit
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:
8 5,4,5
Sod Crops
Idle
Pasture
Forest
TOTAL:
0 9,1,2
Row Crops
Small Grains
Sod Crops
Idle
Pasture
Fruit
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:

186

2 1’33

EEO

1. 016
5:836

9738

:38
37
638
591
209
208
3,1#6
6, 267

13, 828

25:629
11.771

0 3,8,5
Row Crops
Idle
Pasture
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:

D O 1 2
Row Crops
Small Grains
Sod Crops
Idle
Pasture
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:

E—Jggfijbrops

Pasture
TOTAL:

E 0,1,2
Row Crops
Small Grains
Sod Crops
Idle
Pasture
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:

E 3,“,5
Pasture

F O 1 2
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:

E'2§%$§at

GROUP TOTAL:

25:5

C O 1 2

—Iai'5

A 0,1,2
Row Crops

Small Grains
Sod Crops
Idle

Forest
TOTAL:

216

204
218
1, 916
216
1682
M236

APPENDIX D (cont'd.)

B O 1 2
Row’Crops
Small Grains
Sod Crops
Idle
Pasture
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:

GROUP TOTAL:

32:5 0 1 2
A
Row Crops
Small Grains
Sod Crops
Idle

Forest
TOTAL:

D 0 1 2
Sod Crops
Pasture
Other Rural
TOTAL:
GROUP TOTAL:

t A

22'A O 1 2
Sod Crops
Idle
Pasture

F rest
T TAL:

§_QP%;%st

GROUP TOTAL:

s

A 0 1 2
Row Crops
Small Grains
Sod Crops
Idle
Pasture
Forest
TOTAL:

8 O 1 2

-——P§$ture

GROUP TOTAL:

2411

B 0 1 2
Forest

187

#14
1.073
207
199
858
2.895
212

131%?

207
217
1.1m

1,087
3,1“2

868
828
217

1.305
216
216

3:33?

1.269

C O 1 2
god Craps
Idle
Forest
TOTAL:
GROUP TOTAL:

3(1b
A 0 1 2

a if?“
Pasture

GROUP TOTAL:

1 1
A O 2
Row Crops

Small Grains
Sod Crops
Idle
Pasture
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:

D O 2
Row Crops
Sod Crops
Idle
Pasture
Forest
TOTAL:

GROUP TOTAL:

3123
A O 1 2
Row Crops

Sed.Orops
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:

B 0,1,2 ~
Row Crops
Small Grains
Sod Crops
Idle
Pasture
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:

0 0,1,2
Row Crops
Small Grains
Sod Crops

208
213
213

113'. 693

1.355

224
I:379

“In
1.2h7
2. 83
1.901

20 #98

1:262

30.97?

22k

#08
211
836

3%

2
o
'634

#,632
212

APPENDIX D (cont'd.)

Idle
Pasture
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL :
D O 1 2
Idle
Pasture
Forest
TOTAL:
GROUP TOTAL:

212!

A 9:1,2
ow’Orops

Small Grains
Sod Crops
Idle

Pasture
Forest
TOTAL:

B 0 1 2
Row Crops
Small Grains
Sod Crops
Idle
Pasture
Forest
TOTAL:

§_1§%:i1 Grains

GROUP TOTAL:
2 .

O 1 2
Row Crops
Small Grains
Sod Crops
Idle
Forest
TOTAL :
B O 2
Row Crops
Sod Crops
Pasture
Forest
TOTAL:
GROUP TOTAL:

315.!
A 0 1 2

WCrops

188

#2#
#18
1 . 927
#O#
5. 532

626
209
630

zit-£32?

8‘17
1.2#2
903
207
20
1.02
#,#30

1 . 991

621
1,188
1 . 535

659
1.026
7.020

226

I1:373

#00
211
85“
2 :3:
'17#

209
209
209
209

373%?

8#5

Small Grains
Sod Crops
Idle
Forest
TOTAL:
2.0.1.2.
Row Crops
Small Grains
Sod Crops
Idle
Pasture
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:

0 0,1,2
Row Crops
Small Grains
Sod Crops
Forest
TOTAL:

D 0,1,2
Idle
Pasture
Forest
TOTAL:

D 3,#,5
Sod Crops
Pasture
TOTAL:

E 0,1,2
Pasture
Forest
TOTAL:

F O 1 2

Forest

GROUP TOTAL:

3Z5a-a
1 2
Idle
Forest
TOTAL:
0 0,1,2
Row Crops
GROUP TOTAL:

215% 0,1,2

Sod Crops
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:

#2;
1.226

22!:
2. 623
#08
3. 255

189
APPENDIX D (cont'd.)

B O 1 2 Sod Crops 1,625
Small Grains 212 Idle 635
Sod Crops 212 Pasture 1,818
Forest 211 Forest 3,087
TOTAL: 6;5 TOTAL: 8,630

GROUP TOTAL: 3: 9 D O 1 2

Row Crops 860
113% 0 1 2 gmglé Grains 16'862
O rope ,
Pasture 1,253 Idle 7,1
Fruit 212 Pasture 9.1 0
Forest 6.977 Fruit 1,001
TgTAL: 8,#42 Forest 82,???

B 0 2 Other Rural 9 ‘
Fisture 1.044 TOTAL: 118,216
Forest 3.758 D #

Other Rural 209 Row Crops 213

C OTTTQL. 5,011 Small Grains $.313

Sod Crops ,
Pasture #18 Idle 2,?3:

D O 1 2 Pasture e
Pasture #18 Forest 2.789
Forest 209 Other Rural 207
TOTAL: 62 TOTAL: 14,424

GROUP TOTAL: 15,396 E 0 1 2

Row Crops 212
'—'AD 0 1 2 Sod Crops “’36;
Idle ,

. 50' Crops 20.673 Pasture 2.652
Small Grains 26,096 Forest 79.316
Sod Crops £2.#7# Other Rural #.088
1019 .768 TOTAL: 96.8#8
Pasture 2#,86O E :Iuls
Fruit 2:949 Small Grains 434
Forest 21#.586 Sod Crops 1.072
Other Rural 20.319 Pasture 216
TOTAL: #19,225 Forest #,922

AB 3,4,5t 199 TOTAL: ,6##

ores , F oI I2

0 O 1 2 Small Grains 218
Row Crops 5:355 Idle #21
Small Grains 8,611 Pasture 2,293
504 Crops 31.551 Forest 12.218
Idle 17.695 Other Rural 1.238
Feature 12.951 TOTAL: 16.388
Fruit #30 F 3,#,5
Forest 99.521 Sod Crops #2
Other Rural 6.620 GROUP TOTAL: 833,755
TOTAL: 182,73#

C 3H#,5 #a-a

ow Crops 835 AB 0 1 2
Small Grains 630 Row Crops #,108

190
APPENDIX D (cont'd.)

Small Grains 1,282 D 0,1,2
god Crops 33: Forest 209
dle E O 1 2
Pasture 6#8 Forest #48
Forest 1.938 GROUP TOTAL: 8,176
Other Rural 211
TOTAL: 9,861 # 1b 1
C 0 2 0 2
Row Crops 212 Row GrOps 1, 10
Small Grains #23 Small Grains 21
Forest 218 Sod Crops #, 26
D oTngL: 353 Idle 2 1f;
Pasture :
Pgrgst 216 Forest 7.227
E 0 Other Rural
forest 862 GROUP TOTAL: 17.23;
GROUP TOTAL: 11.792' 8
[1e
#3 , ' 0,1,2
AB 0 1 2 Row Crops #35
Row Crops 83 Small Grains 217
Small Grains 1,2 Sod Crops 1,712
Sod Crops 6,311 Idle 677
Idle 3:737 Pasture 21
Pasture .020 Forest #,2
Forest 1#,O#O GROUP TOTAL: .23
Other Rural 2 182
GROUP TOTAL: 327588 #12:
, . AB 0,1,2
AD 0 1 2 0' ropsi 3'53:
Small Gra ms ,
Row 0r0ps #,215 Sod Crops 13,352
Small Grains 97 Idle 5:973
Sod 0r0ps 5, 61 Pasture 2, 12
Idle 9.688 Fruit . 1#
Pasture #,828 Forest #2, 66
Forest 38,93# Other Rural #. 9
Other Rural 1,?02 TOTAL: 75,##8
GROUP TOTAL: , 32 C 0 1 2
-__R3:-Orops - 1:254
#113 Small Grains 1,:35
AB 0 1 2 Sod Crops 1, 6
Row Crops 1,053 Idle 2.785
Idle 1:293 Pasture 3,6 6
Pasture #21 Forest 21, 6
Forest 2,765 Other Rural 08
gghxi Rural 5 3?: TOTAL: 32,550
T 8 g D 0.1.2
0 0 1 2 Row Crops 197
Sod Crops ##8 Small Grains 216
Pasture 1,089 Sod Crops 5,#12
Forest 22# Idle 1,612
TOTAL: 1,761 Pasture 1,#35

191
APPENDIX D (cont'd.)

#ZZD

# 2 -s

m

Forest 8,631
Other Rural 396
TBTAL: 17,899
D .
Forest #26
E O 1 2
Idle #1?
Pasture 998
Forest 2.u92
TOTAL: 3.907
E 3,#,§
F oFgrzst #2#
Pasture 213
Forest 1:991
TOTAL: 2,20u
F 35#,§
orest 22#
GROUP TOTAL: 133,085
AB 0 1 2
Row Crops 5,9#0
Small Grains 7,317
Sod Crops 16,683
Idle 16,305
Pasture 1#,360
Forest 78,003
Other Rural 3,966
TOTAL! 1&2057u
‘—-£*-*-2“ ‘5 5E2
o rops
GROUP TOTAL: 3,2
A O 1 2
Row Crops 1,059
Small Grains 217
Sod Crops #26
Idle 890
Forest 1,722
Other Rural 226
GROUP TOTAL: £7356
AB 0 1 2
Row Orops 1,7#6
Small Grains 2,1#7
Sod CrOps ,9#2
Idle ,12
Pasture 2,3
Forest 2#,367

Other Rural
GROUP TOTAL:

213%3 O 1 2

Forest

AB 0 1 2
fiOW’CrOPB
Small Grains
Sod Crops
Idle
Pasture
Fruit
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:

AB $.41;
m Grains

Idle

Pasture

Forest
a ”3%“

0

Row CrOps
Small Grains
Sod Crops
Idle
Pasture
Fruit
Forest
Other Rural
TETAL:

Row Crops
Small Grains
Sod Crops
Idle
Pasture
Fruit
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:

D 0 2
Row Crops
Small Grains
Sod Crops
Idle
Pasture
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:

rétfifi

192
APPENDIX D (cont'd.)

D 3 “:5 Forest 3 427
go; grape 1 122 c OTOTAL: 5:290
O rops 0 2
Idle 9: 03 +astur: 207
Pasture 31 Forest 20?
Fruit 595 TOTAL: #1#
Forest 9.116 C #
Other Rural 22# asture #1#
'TOTAL: 20,929 Forest 207
E Qa1,2 TOTAL: 621
on Crops 207 GROUP TOTAL: 6,325
Sod Crops 1,076
1521;: 2'32? 2" AB 0 1 2
s e
Forest 106:223 Row Erops 1,8#O
Other Rural 2, 19 Small Grains 1,010
TOTAL: 119, 26 Sod Crops * 820
E 3§#,§ Idle 8,829
od Crops 631 Pasture 2,765
Idle #31 Fruit 1,388
Pasture 207 Forest 123,367
Forest #:771 Other Rural 61
P ngTgL: 6,0#0 GROUP TOTAL: 3,
Pal. 51 28‘: b-hB 0 1 2
orest ’
Other Rural '206 Row Crops 600
TOTAL: 52,72# Small Grains 832
E 3!#!5 Sod Crops 5,856
e 851 Idle 1,789
Forest 3,518 Pasture 5,321
TOTAL: I262 Forest 76,987
GROUP TOTAL: 1:3 : 77 Other Rural 2,663
GROUP TOTAL: ,
is 0.1.2 1 8 7:9 1
orest 2 AB 0 2
Other Rural .203 Row Grops 1,#07
TOTAL: 2,027 Small Grains 1,002
0 0,1,2 Sod Crops #,260
D oForget 206 idle 2,?78
asture 9 95
Forest 672 Fruit .198
38%;: Rural :2 Eggeet a1 210,371
: er Rur 2 22
GROUP TOTAL: "—11”, 3 GROUP TOTAL: 3537335
“‘23 0 1 2 c.iL 0 1 2
Small Grains #1# Sod Crops #23
Idle 1,033 Idle 2,072
Pasture #1 Pasture 7,832

APPENDIX D (cont'd.)

Forest
Other Rural
GROUP TOTAL:

512;

AB 2
on rope
Small Grains
Sod Crops
Idle
Pasture
Forest
Other Rural
0 TOTAL:

0 2
Row’crops
Sod Crops
Idle
Pasture
Forest
TOTAL:

D Q! ,2
ow Crops
Forest
TOTgL:
E 0g},
orest

GROUP TOTAL:

5(2¥ .
O 1 2

Ron’Orops
Small Grains
Sod CrOps
Idle
Pasture
Fruit
Forest
Other Rural

GROUP TOTAL:

5.13.3

Ag 0,1,2
0" rope
Small Grains
Sod Crops
Idle
Pasture
Fruit
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:

16,688

617,232

1#,861

681,113

AB §,#,§
od rope
Idle
Forest
Other Rural
0 TETgL:
0
Row Crops
Small Grains
Sod Crops
Idle
Pasture
Fruit
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL: ‘

2.3%.:
od Crops

Idle
Pasture
Fruit
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:

D O 1 2
Idle
Pasture
Forest
Other Rural

D TETAL:
Idle
Forest ‘
Other Rural
TOTAL:

E O 1 2
Idle
Pasture
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:

E #

. asture
Fruit
Forest
TOTAL:

F 0,1,2
Forest

12.2.1
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:

GROUP TOTAL:

826

1,158,602

APPENDIX D (cont'd.)

5,2a
O 1 2
_—_§:ZII Grains

Sod Crops
Idle
Pasture
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:

0 91112
d e
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:

D 0 1 2
Idle
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:

2-2P%Pést

E O 1 2
Pasture
Forest
Other Rural

Forest
TOTAL:
GROUP TOTAL:

—-i 9:1-2
ow Crops

Small Grains
Sod Crops
Idle

Pasture
Forest

Other Rural
TOTAL:

B O 1 2
Pasture
Fruit
Forest
TOTAL:

GROUP TOTAL:

L-#a

19#

I 23;
2:922
381, o
8.897
393.987

851
66,527

1.34
68.719
212
29.319
395
29.926
18#

1,#70
18,#7g

55
20,501
1,#G6
212

325
525.13%

1:1:
836
850

1 g 23

59' 3 o

1 :0#6

65.255

830

2,019

B,2#6
:

A 0 1 2
-—_P3;;st
B O l 2

-_—P33ture

GROUP TOTAL:

L-#c
I 0 1 2
Small Grains
Pasture
Forest
TOTAL:
B 0 1 2

Porest

GROUP TOTAL:
Lmflg

A O 1 2
Row Crops
Idle
Pasture
Forest

Other Rural
GROUP TOTAL:

Mg

A 0,1,2
Row’Orops
Small Grains
Sod Crops
Idle
Pasture
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:

3 0,1,2
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:

0 O 1 2

Forest

GROUP TOTAL:

Mc-a
A O 1 2
"'Tai:
Pasture
Forest
Other Rural

TOTAL:
0 O 1 2

Porest

 

1,028
2,66#
3.910
11.773
377.113
11,768
#10,056

#38
225
663
216
510.935

#26
5'73;
20:669
76,126

#50

APPENDIX D (cont'd.)

GROUP TOTAL:

Mlle
A O 1 2
Row Crops

Idle

Forest

Other Rural
GROUP TOTAL:

M13c

A O 1 2
Sm:Il Grains
Sod Crops
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:

3 O 1 2

-_—P;:ture

GROUP TOTAL:

MZEO ‘
0,1,2
Sod Crops
Idle
Pasture
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:
2.9.4.2
Forest
GROUP TOTAL:

U!!! N
A 0,1,2
Idle
Pasture
Forest
GROUP TOTAL:

95 e .
A O 1 2
Pasture
Forest
: TF3“
0
Small Grains
Sod Crops
Idle
Forest

Other Rural
TOTAL:

195

73.373

1,200
#52
6,568
200

1,085
660

8
1:0,:22

#, 6O

117. 05

I17.3§7

215
12,0#6
12,261

212
212

1#,966
1,236
16,830

0 O 1 2
god Crops
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:
D 0,1,2
Sod Crops
12.112
Forest
F 0 1 2
Row Crops
Forest
TETAL:

F
Sod Crops
GROUP TOTAL:

Q22 1
A O 2
Pasture
Forest
GROUP TOTAL:

Ra

A O 1 2
-__SE:II Grains
Sod Crops

Idle
Pasture’
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:

B 0,1,2
Idle
Pasture
Fruit
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:

C O 1 2
Idle
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:

E O 1 2

Porest

GROUP TOTAL:
Rbc

A 0,1,2
Forest

LRA TOTAL:

850
2,101

3.77
209
1,04“

212
#23
635

55%

200
200
500

635
1,269
#00
83
13.0

16.81%

204
626
20#
20.671
825
22.530

209
2,083

#13
2.705

12,522
7.551.075

Miscellaneous

SmRIl Grains

Pasture
TOTAL:

0 O 1 2
Porest
Other Rural
TOTAL:

D 0 1 2‘

“PM
0

GROUP TOTAL:
0c

—AO12

Row Crops
Small Grains
Other Rural
TOTAL:

2.2.1.2.
Row Crops
Small Grains
TOTAL:

GROUP TOTAL:

£§ 1

A O 2
Row Crops
Sod Crops
Forest
TOTAL:

B 0,1,2
Row Crops
Small Grains
Sod Crops
Idle
Other Rural
TOTAL:

C O 1 2

Sod Crops

D 0 1 2
Idle
GROUP TOTAL:

APPENDIX E

#1#
#1#
828

1.377
619
1.996
1.771
626

#18

3.339

62#
208
208
1,0#O

208
#16
62#

832
2.079
208
3.119

2,# 5

10.395

208
208

196

Land Use By SMU In LRA 96

12
A O 1 2
Row Crops
Small Grains
Sod Crops
Idle
GROUP TOTAL:

19
A 0 1 2
Small Grains
Pasture

Other.Rural
GROUP TOTAL:

1,5a

A 0:132

E 1 2t
0
Row Crops
Small Grains
Sod Crops
Idle
Pasture
Fruit
Forest
Other Rural

0 TOTgL:
O, ,
Small Grains
Sod Crops
Idle
Other Rural
TOTAL:

0 3a#,¥
ru t

D 0 1 2
Smgll Grains
Idle
Fruit
TOTAL:

E O 1 2
Sod Crops
Pasture
Forest
TOTAL:

#16
208
1.867
#16
579713

208
655
218
1.681’

62#

2.752
2. 23
‘808
645
:16

03
#02

819

208
62

208

218
#16
62#

218
#18
62#
1,260

APPENDIX E (cont'd.)

F O 1 2
SmRIl Grains
Pasture

Forest
TOTAL:

Litlhj
ow CrOps

Forest
TOTAL:
GROUP TOTAL:

1,5%

0 1 2

Row Crops
Small Grains

Sod Crops
TOTAL:

B O 1 2
Row Crops
Small Grains
Sod Crops
TOTAL:

GROUP TOTAL:

1 1

A O 2
Row CrOps
Sod Crops
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:

B 0,1,2

Forest
GROUP TOTAL:

2

0-1 2

Row Crops
Small Grains
Sod Crops
Idle

Forest
TOTAL:

9.94112

Sod Crops
Pasture
Fruit
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:

197

218

D O 1 2
Sod Crops
Other Rural
TOTAL:

E O 1 2
Pasture
Forest
TOTAL:

F 0 2
Pasture
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:

F 3,#,§
Forest

GROUP TOTAL:

+2 "31 2
Sod Crops

2

O 1 2
'-_§E:Il Grains
Sod CrOps

Idle
Pasture
Forest
TOTAL:

B O 1 2
'_—§5:Il Grains
Sod CrOps

Pasture

Forest

Other Rural

TOTAL:
GROUP TOTAL:

2,5E-s 1
2

god Crops
Idle
TOTAL:

B 0,1,2
Sod Crops
Forest
TOTAL:

GROUP TOTAL:

215
215
#30

1,862
2,291

39#
1,07#
215
1,683
6 860

215

#29
215
828
207

1.9 3
3,632

207
1,718

206
1,#70

21

3,816
7. 27

215
207
#22

1,07#
1 281

i.702

APPENDIX E (cont'd.)

-cs
A O 1 2

Forest

2
i O 1 2
gszl Grains

Sod Crops
Idle
Pasture
Forest
TOTAL:
3.9.4.2
Forest
GROUP TOTAL:

2,5g-c
A O 1 2
m.
Forest
GROUP TOTAL:

2; A O 1 2
Row'Crops
Small Grains
Sod Crops
Idle
Pasture
Fruit
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:

B O 2
Row Crops
Small Grains
Sod Crops
Idle
Pasture
Fruit
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:
B 3,#,§
Other Rural
0 O 1 2
Row Crops
Small Grains
Sod Crops
Idle
Pasture
Fruit

198

835

208
63

#1 ‘

#1#

2.791
a.aa:

r32

39#

%%3

207
#1#

Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:

0 3!#,5
dle
Forest
Other Rural
D TOTQL:
0
Row Crops
Small Grains
Sod Crops
Idle-
Pasture
Fruit
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:

2.3.52.1
mall Grains

Sod Crops
Idle
Pasture
Fruit
Other Rural
TOTAL:

E 0,1,2
Row Crops
Sod Crops
Idle
Pasture
Fruit
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:

§_2P%Pgst

Other Rural
TOTAL:

F O 1 2
Row Crops
Sod Crops
Idle
Pasture
Fruit
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:

G 0,1,2
Forest

GROUP TOTAL:

APPENDIX E (cont'd.)

3a-s
A O 1 2
szll Grains
Sod Crops
Idle
Fruit
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:
B 9:1,2
0d Crops
GROUP TOTAL:
32

A 0,1,2
Row*cr0ps
Sod Crops
Idle
Pasture
Other Rural
TOTAL:

3 O 1 2
Row Crops
Idle
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:
GROUP TOTAL:

3b-s
O 1 2
SmRIl Grains

Sod Crops
Idle
Pasture
Fruit A
Forest

B OTngL.
Sod Crops
Pasture
Fruit
TOTAL:

GROUP TOTAL:

19;!
A 0 1 2
-—_Sfizll Grains
Sod Crops
Pasture
Forest

199

209
62.6
626
209
#18
#18
2. 506

27%?2

632

209
197
626
811

Other Rural
3 0:32“
asture
Forest
TOTAL:
GROUP TOTAL:

243

A O 1 2
Small Grains
Sod Crops
Pasture
Fruit
Forest
TOTAL:

B 0 . 2
PasEUre
Forest
Other.Rural

TOTAL:
GROUP TOTAL:

3‘2 .
A O 1 2
god Crops
Idle
Pasture

Other Rural
TOTAL:

B O 1 2
Row Crops
Sod Crops
Fruit
0 TOTAL:
0 2
Sod Crops
Pasture
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:
D O 1 2
god Crops
Idle
Pasture
Fruit
TOTAL:
2.2.242
Sod Crops

§_1§%G§Crops

209
2,052

209
#18
627
2,678

802

1 2;:
'#16
1 . 637
4: 52?

201:

1 , 029
5

1 ##8

31371:

23%
197

208
1.215

208
197

197
602

1,187
20#
2,t:02
39#
197

197
1.575

1:1 5
#37

APPENDIX E (cont'd.)

F O 1 2
Pasture

' GROUP TOTAL:

:[2b
0 1 2
-—§E:Il Grains

Sod Crops
Other Rural
GROUP TOTAL:

A 0 1 2

god Crops
B 0 1 2
--§33—Orops

GROUP TOTAL:

315.12
A012

-_-P3P;st

5:;
AB 0,1,g
Row rope
Small Grains
Sod Crops
Idle
Pasture
Fruit
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:
AB g:#!5
u t
Forest
0 oTOTAL:
2
Row Crops
Small Grains
Sod Crops
Idle
Pasture
Fruit
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:
0 3,#,2
Fru t
D O 1 2

Row Crops

Sod Crops

200

1,65#

816
2:E7I

Idle
Pasture
Fruit
Forest
Other.Rural
TOTAL:

D 3!#i5
d e
Forest
E TOTAL:
0 2
803 Crops
Idle
Pasture
Fruit
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:

E 3!#,5
dle
Fruit
Forest
TOTAL:
F 0,1,2
Row Crops
Sod Crops
Idle
Pasture
Forest
Other Rural
TgTAL:
F 3! 15
e
Fruit
Forest
G TOTAL:

0 2
Pasture
Forest
TOTAL:

GROUP TOTAL:

_A3012

Row Crops
Small Grains
Sod 0r0ps
Idle
Pasture
Forest
Other Rural
GROUP TOTAL:

APPENDIX E (cont'd.)

#0

“ AB 0 1 2
Row drops
Small Grains
Idle
Forest
Other Rural

GROUP TOTAL:

#(1b .
AB 0 1 2
Row 0r0ps
#[Zg <1
AB 0 2
Row Crops
Small Grains
Idle
Pasture
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:
0 0'1

2
Sod Crops

Idle
TOTAL:

D 0 1 2,
Idle
Pasture
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:

E O 1 2
forest

F 0,1,2
Pasture
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:

GROUPJTOTAL:

#[2b 0 1,2

Row Crops
Small Grains
Sod Crops
Idle
Pasture
Forest
Other Rural

GROUP TOTAL:

201

198
198
62#
3,120

17.3%

207

81#
18#
208
208
215
2,100
3.769

#16
#16
832

208
2g;
2
#11
1,0#1

81#

20#
611
#07
1 222

7:377

2,287
1,236
7: 79
2. 95
2,681
2,088

197%?

#120

AB 0 1 2
Row drops
Pasture

Forest
GROUP TOTAL:

a

AB 0 1 2
Row’drops
Small Grains
Sod Crops
Idle
Pasture
Fruit
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:

Waits:

C O 1 2
Row Crops
Small Grains
Sod Crops
Idle
Pasture
Fruit
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:

9.2fi215
ow Crops

Idle
Fruit
Forest
TOTAL:

D O 1 2
Row'CrOps
Small Grains
Sod Crops
Idle
Pasture
Fruit
Forest
Other Rural
TgTAL:

D 3, ,5
Small Grains
Idle
Pasture
Fruit
TOTAL:

208
1.895
11

522%

3,808
6.992
7,086
28,512
5.33“
10,71
81,23
19.878
163.559

APPENDIX E (cont'd.)

E O 1 2
Idle
Pasture
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:

E 4
Snail Grains'

Sod Crops
Pasture
Fruit
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:

F 0‘1 2
Sod Crops
Idle
Pasture
Fruit
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:

I
.

F 31h,§

dle
Fruit
Forest

TOTAL:
GROUP TOTAL:

52:11

AB 0:112
Forest
Other Rural

GROUP TOTAL:

52

A; 0,1,é
ow reps
Small Grains
Sod Crops
Idle
Pasture
Forest
Other Rural
GROUP TOTAL:

§2=TB o 1 2
Row Crops
Small Grains
Sod Crops

202

2,u1o
#08

23.387
825
32.030

20#
1,7#6
1,2“4

207
1,#64
1,021
5,886

873
1,023
3.7“9

20b

22.92?

1,238

30,01u

1,196
198
1,809

333111?

418
1,050
1

812
198
198
#60
073

GNU
.0.

2
13,552

1,1:17
208
624

Idle
Pasture
Forest ,
Other Rural
GROUP TOTAL:

o
5-.AB 0 1 2
-—R3;L0rops

Small Grains
Sod Crops
Idle
Pasture
Forest

Other Rural
GROUP TOTAL:

52:T3 0 1 2
Row Crops
Small Grains
Sod Crops
Idle
Forest
GROUP TOTAL:

512a
B O 1 2
'__R8W‘Grops

Idle
Pasture
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:

0 0,1,2
Pasture

D O 1 2
Pasture

E 0 1 2

Porest

GROUP TOTAL:
2b

0 1 2

Small Grains
Sod Crops
Idle

Pasture
Forest

Other Rural
GROUP TOTAL:

2,1“0
3,408

208
20#
gas

62#

208
1,209

#1#
3

. 03
37%

APPENDIX E (cont'd.)

a

AB 0 1 2
Row Crops
Small Grains
Sod Crops
Idle
Pasture
Fruit
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:

AB g,4,5
orest

C O 1 2
-—8;:Il Grains
Sod Crops

Idle
Pasture
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:

Q-1R%:5Orops

Idle

Fruit
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:

D O 1 2
Row Crops
Pasture
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:

2_2P%;ést

E 0 1 2
Pasture
Forest
TOTAL:

F O 1 2
Pasture
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:

F 3,0,5
Idle

GROUP TOTAL:

203

198
3.467

25:
9:
533
1.983
63,182

1,601
81.576

62#

605
218
2,291
1,066

27.22;

32.3“5

198
2,h27
198

1,#07

397
0,627
197

832
11,36#
197

12.590
1:16

218
2.435
2.653

218
1u0853
1,660
16.731

at???

208

Pasture
Forest

Other Rural

TOTAL:

0 0 1 2
Porest

2.9.1.2
Forest

GROUP TOTAL:

L-2c

I 0 1 2
Sod Crops
Idle
Pasture
Fruit
Forest

GROUP TOTAL:

L-ha
A O 1 2

Sod Crops

B 0,1,2
Row Crops

Sod Crops
Idle
Fruit
Forest
TOTAL:
GROUP TOTAL:

L-MQ
A O 1 2

-_§E:II Grains

Sod Crops
Pasture
Forest

Other Rural

GROUP TOTAL:

Me
A O 1 2
Row Crops
Sod Crops
Idle
Pasture
Forest

Other Rural

GROUP TOTAL:

208
15.529
208
16,153
1.2!:9

218
17,325

208

402
397
1

§,2 g

u17

397
198

595
1:992

111%

218
1,288
819
11.755

.279

#16
829

5
1,278
“2:797
811

APPENDIX E (cont'd.)

Mo-a O 1 2
Porest
Other Rural
GROUP TOTAL:

fills
A O 1 2
late
Other Rural
GROUP TOTAL:

M
0,15%
t
Forest

Other Rural
GROUP TOTAL:

uzgc

0 1 2

Row Crops
Small Grains
Idle

Forest

Other Rural

GROUP TOTAL:

M c 1 2
0
Porest
Other Rural
GROUP TOTAL:

9; 1

A O 2
Pgrest

B O 2
Row Crops
Sod Crops
Idle
Fruit
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:

C 0 2
Porest
Other Rural

TOTAL:
GROUP TOTAL:

LRA TOTAL:

79
12,56
22

,o

20#

5.377
O

1:“55
208
I:333

204
5,298

373%

198
595
3

1.237
1

2:791

1,028
#18
8G1

1,670

1,#91
#18

5,866

7.9 9

18,38;

1,364,660

 

 

 

APPENDIX F

Land Use By SMU In LRA 97

Miscellggeoug Idle :3;
A 0 1 2 Pasture
Fruit 20 Fruit #,181
Forest 2,22 Forest 8#7
GROUP TOTAL: 2.93 TOTAL: 13,#57
B 0,1,2
15 Row Crops 1,8#1
A 0 1 2 Small Grains 615
Row Crops 190 Sod Crops #22
Sod Crops 818 Idle 1.919
TOTAL: 1,008 Fruit 2,60
B O 2 Forest
Row-Crops 2,337 Other Rural 209
Small Grains 2, 9 TOTAL: 8 ##
Sod Crepe 399 GROUP TOTAL: 21,513
Idle 190
Pasture 1 £12 19 1
Fru t . 7 A 0 2
Forest 212 Row Crops 209
Other Rural #25 Small Grains 380
TOTAL: 7,995 Sod Crops 399
C 0,1,2 Forest 8#
Row Crops #25 GROUP TOTAL: 1, 35
Small Grains #02
Sod Crops 33; 1 a 1
Idle A 0 2
er ura B O 2
TOTAL: 2,880 Row Crops 3,#6#
C 3a#:5 Small Grains 3,282
~ t #02 Sod Crops , 2,165
Forest 212 Idle 1,710
TRTAL: 614 gruit 1 330
E 3, ,5 orest , O
Sod Crops 209 Other Rural 1,352
Forest 209 TOTAL: 13,993
TOTAL: #18 C 0,1,2
F O 1 2 Row Crops 1,822
Porest 532 Small Grains 950
GROUP TOTAL: 3, Sod Crops 1,185
Idle 1,162
12 Pasture 570
A 0,1,2 Fruit 570
Row Crops 2,067 Forest 1,710
Small Grains 1.3% Other Rural 782
Sod Crops #, 02 TOTAL: 8,751

APPENDIX F (cont'd.)

Q_2§&15
ow Crops

Small Grains
TOTAL:

D 0,1,2
Sod Crops
Idle
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:

D 3,#,5
Sod Crops
Idle
TOTAL:

§-31%12

Forest
Small Grains
Pasture
Forest
TOTAL:

EL2P%P3st

GROUP TOTAL:

1,5b

A 0 1 2
Row Orops
Small Grains
Sod Crops
Idle
Fruit
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:

B O 1 2
Row Crops
Small Grains
Sod Craps
Idle
Pasture
Fruit
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:

GROUP TOTAL:

1159

A 0,1,2
Row Crops

206

190
1,1#0
1.330

380
190
1,#27
190
2,187

380
1,1#O

190
190
380

201
#02
972
1.575

1, 85
1, 52

1,520
609
#02
201

6,161

3 211
1:628

1,1#O

1411:;

983

Small Grains
Sod Crops
Idle
Fruit
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:

B O 1 2
Row Crops
Small Grains
Fruit
Other Rural
TOTAL:

GROUP TOTAL:

2115

A 0,1,2
Row Craps

Fruit
Other Rural

3 onTéL'
Row Craps
Small Grains
Sod Crops
Idle
Pasture
Fruit
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:

B 3,#,5

c Ff“2*
O
Row'Crops
Small Grains
Sod Crops
Idle
Pasture
Fruit
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:

QLJfiiii
ow Crops

Sod Crops
TOTAL:

D 0,1,2
Sod Crops
Idle
Pasture

Forest
TOTAL:

1,000
1,019
1.539
615
3.191
9
8,7#6

190

APPENDIX F (cont'd.)

2

2

112,14
ow Crops

Idle
Fruit
Forest
E TOTAL:
0 2
IHIe
Pasture
Forest
TOTAL:
E #
Forest
F O 1 2
Forest
GROUP TOTAL:

a-s

A 0 1 2
Row Crops
Small Grains
Sod Crops
Idle
Fruit
Forest

B oTOTAL:

2

Row Crops
Small Grains
Sod Crops
Idle
Pasture
Fruit
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:

GROUP TOTAL:

,5b

A 0 1 2
Row Crops
Small Grains
Sod Crops
Idle
Pasture
Fruit
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:

B 0,1,2
Row'Orops
Small Grains

207

950

760

380
609
190
760
3. 546

1,256

Sod Crops
Idle
Pasture
Fruit
Forest
TOTAL:
GROUP TOTAL:

2,5b-s

3.25..

2

A O 1 2
Row Crops
Small Grains
Sod Crops
Idle
Pasture
Fruit
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:

B O 1 2
Row Crops
Small Grains
Idle
Pasture
Fruit
Forest
TOTAL:

GROUP TOTAL:

0

A 0 1 2
Row Crops
Idle
Pasture
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:

B 0 1 2
Sm8ll Grains
Forest
Other Rural

TOTAL:
GROUP TOTAL:

I 50-8

A 0 1 2
WCI‘OPB
Small Grains
Sod Crops
Idle
Pasture
Fruit

82?
80

19
380
1,268

6%

#,788
628
612

2:309
19
1,027

1.053
818

11,85#

818
209
628
209
837
2,67#

7. 0

212
190
#19
209
190
1,220

190

#02
212

27525

na¢weuoa:
. Q C C .
HmH##H
‘OHPO‘NV
ommuou

APPENDIX F (cont'd.)

Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:
B 0 2
Row Crops
Small Grains
Sod Crepe
Idle
Fruit
Forest
TOTAL:
GROUP TOTAL:

A O 1 2
Row'Crops
Small Grains
Sod Crops
Idle
Pasture
Fruit
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:

B 0 1 2
Row Crops
Small Grains
Sod Crops
Idle
Pasture
Fruit
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:

B 3l#!5

e
Fruit
Forest
0 TOTAL:
0 2
Row Crops
Small Grains
Sod Crops
Idle
Pasture
Fruit
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:

$151.1
mall Grains

Sod Crops

208

7.710
18
28,#36
209

.g.
0

Idle
Fruit
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:

D 0 1 2
Row Crops
Small Grains
Idle
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:

D 3E#,5
ow Crops

Small Grains
Sod Crops
Idle
Pasture
Fruit
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:

E O 1 2
$68 Crops
Idle
TOTAL:

3.35.1.1
od Crops

Idle
Pasture
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:
F O 1 2
Idle
Forest
F TgTAL:
Idle
Fruit
Forest

TOTAL:
GROUP TOTAL:

-m
A O 1 2

Row Crops

Sod Crops
TOTAL:

B 0,1,2
RoW’Orops
Small Grains

3,168
1,826
818
209
6.839

190
201
2,220
1,008

4,1121

2.311
1,807
2:792
2,0“2
1,992

209

1:997
1,126

13.775

:71
O
1,0Z1
3‘28

3

628

1 . 335
707
1:, 241
236
996

1 .232
236

190
628

1327537

236
1:71
707

2,829
1,886

APPENDIX F (cont'd.)

Sod Crops
TOTAL:
GROUP TOTAL:

1. A O 1 2
P;:It

A O 1 2
Row Crops
Forest
GROUP TOTAL:

311a
0 1 2
Row Crops

Sod Crops
Idle
Fruit
Forest
TOTAL:

B O 2
Row Crops
Small Grains
Sod Crops
Idle
Pasture
Fruit
Forest

Other Rural
TOTAL:

C O 1 2
Snail Grains

Sod Crops
Idle

Fruit
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:

0.2.51.1
od Crops

F O 1 2
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:

GROUP TOTAL:

1&1 6.1.2

Row'Crops

209

#71

380

NN
Had
NM

29519
190

8#O
212

r4137;

2.073

Small Grains
Idle
Pasture
Fruit
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:

B O, ,2
Idle

GROUP TOTAL:

21.23

A 0 1 2

'_-§E:Il Grains
Forest
TOTAL:

B 0 2

-—-RE:-Crops
Small Grains
Sod Crops
Idle
Pasture
Fruit
Forest
TOTAL:

C 0,1,2
Row Crops
Small Grains
Sod Crops
Forest
TOTAL:

D 0 1 2

‘__—P;:ture

GROUP TOTAL:

212—b

A 0,1,2
Row Crops
Small Grains
Idle
Fruit

B OTTTQL.
Row Crops
Sod Crops
Idle
Pasture
Fruit
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:

GROUP TOTAL:

2,102
2:270

212
212
#19
7.687

7.87%

#19
190
609

1,852
#19
1,2#O
631
631
628

609
6,010

1.037
190
209
#19

1.855

8:%%¥

1119

209
1,603
2,240

1,027

APPENDIX F (cont'd.)

i 0 1 2
Row Crops
Small Grains
Sod Crops
Pasture
Fruit
Forest
Other Rural
TOTQL:

B 0
Row Crops
Small Grains
Sod Crops
Idle
Pasture
Fruit
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:

B 3,#,5
Sod Crops

G 0 1 2
Row Crops
Small Grains
Sod Crops
Idle
Pasture
Fruit
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:

0 3,#,5
Row Crops
Sod Crops
Idle
Pasture
Fruit
Other Rural
TOTAL:

D 0 2
Row Crops
Sod Crops
Idle
Pasture
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:

D 3§#,5
ow Crops

Small Grains
SodACrops

210

1,88#

3.252

190
769
380
209
1,#08
1,60#
#,560

992
209
#25

Idle
Pasture
Other Rural
TOTAL:

E 0 2

-_—§38_Orops
Idle
Forest
Other Rural
TETAL:

E 21 ,5

dle

Pasture
Forest
TOTAL:

F O 1 2
Tile
Pasture
Forest
TOTAL:

GROUP TOTAL:

215!

A 0 1 2
Row Crops
Small Grains
Sod Crops
Idle
Pasture
Fruit
Other Rural
TOTAL:

B O 1 2

FruIt

GROUP TOTAL:

3&2

8.9.1.2
Row Crops

Small Grains
Sod Crops
Pasture
Fruit
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:
B O 2
Row Crops
Sod Crops
Idle
TOTAL:
GROUP TOTAL:

779
63#
2.357
5.396

209
#19

837
236
1,701

950
1.097

2,83#
209

1 §§3
'4’

103,

1.159
609

APPENDIX F (cont'd.)

‘2.

AB 0 1 2
Row Crops
Small Grains
Sod Crops
Idle
Pasture
Fruit
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:
AB 3,#l5
co?“
2
Row Crops
Small Grains
Sod Crops
Idle
Pasture
Fruit
Forest '
Other Rural
TOTAL:
0 3E#:5
t
Other Rural
D TOTAL:
0 2
Small Grains
Fruit
Forest
TOTAL:

Q-JR%:§Orops

Small Grains
Sod Crops
Pasture
Fruit
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:

E 0 1 2
Small Grains
Pasture
TOTAL:

F 0,1,2
Sod Crops
Idle
Forest
TOTAL:

GROUP TOTAL:

211

13,88#

3,888
1,#52
1,162

80#
5.371
3,060
1.179

30,800

380

2,186
829

2,33;

212
1,600
1,678

209
9:796

190
212
#02

603
760
209
1.572

190
209
799
209
380
609
209
2,605

#02
391
793

190
190
190

#6517

#b

55:.

—AB012

Row Crops
Small Grains
Sod Crops
Idle
Pasture
Fruit
Forest
GROUP TOTAL:

AB 0 1 2
Row Grops
Small Grains
Sod Crops
Idle
Fruit
Forest
Other Rural
GROUP TOTAL:

#[1b

AB 0 1 2
Row 0r0ps
Small Grains
Sod Crops
Idle
Fruit
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:

AB 3,#l5
Fru t

GROUP TOTAL:

5122

AB 0 1 2
Row Crops
Small Grains
Sod Crops
Idle
Fruit
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:

0 O 2
Row Crops
Idle
TOTAL:

1,617

1,#21
779
236

1,710

1‘88

1,056
212

850
380
209
212
3.766

190
827

212

APPENDIX F (cont'd.)

D O 1 2 E 0 1 2
“*7. a 2; “17?
ores F 0 2
TOTAL: 637 Idle
D # GROUP TOTAL:
asture 212
E 0f1*2; 2° 53 1 2
Pasiire AB 0
GROUP TOTAL: 3735; Row Crops
# Small Grains
[2b Sod Crops
9,1,2 Idle
Row rope 782 Pasture
Fruit
#12; Forest
AB 3,1,2 Other Rural
so: crope ii; TOEAL:
0 reps AB 3, ,5
Idle 209 orest
Forest 1,2#3. GROUP TOTAL:
Other Rural __292 ~
GROUP TOTAL: 2,293 5b-h
AB 0 1 2
55 ,1 2 Sod 0r0ps
AB 0 Idle
Row Crops 2.91# Pasture
Small Grains 212 Fruit
Sod Crops 212 Forest
Idle 2,#28 GROUP TOTAL:
Fruit “:215
ForestR al {.233 5g 1
Other ur . AB 0 2
TOTAL: 12,#OO Row Cropsin
C O 1 2 Small Gra s
Row'Crops #25 Sod Crops
Idle 615 Idle
Fruit 805 Pasture
Forest 615 Fruit
Other Rural 190 Forest
TOTAL: 2,650 Other Rural
0 # GROUP TOTAL:
FFUIt 190
D 0,1,2 512a
Row Crops 190 AB 0 1 2
Idle 380 Row Grops
Fruit 190 Small Grains
Forest 212 Sod Crops
TBTAL: 972 Idle
D 3I I5 Fruit
d e 190 Forest
Forest 209 Other Rural
TOTAL: 399 TOTAL:

8,086

5.
16,11#

##Hmka
C O C O Q 9 O

0:000:1me
O\O\ONUU\H
O‘NJOxOmUnO

..s

N
o
\O

N

APPENDIX F (cont'd.)
c 0 1 2

Row Crops
Sod Crops
Fruit
Forest
TOTAL:

D 3fl#,5
ow Crops

Sod Crops
Pasture
TOTAL:

F 0'1 2
Pasture
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL :

GROUP TOTAL:

51.2.1.)

AB 0 1 2
Row 0r0ps
Small Grains
Sod Crops
Idle
Pasture
Fruit
Forest
Other Rural
GROUP TOTAL:

a .
L313612
Row Craps
Small Grains
30d Crops
Idle,
Pasture
Fruit _
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:
AB 3,#,5
d e:
Forest
TOTAL:
0 0,1,2
Row Crops
Small Grains
Sod Crops
Idle
Pasture
Fruit

213

Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:

£1,215
ow Crops

Small Grains

Idle

Fruit

Forest

Other Rural

~ TOTAL:

2.2.1.2

Row Crops

Idle

Fruit

Forest

TOTAL:

we.
Sm Grains

Idle
Pasture
Forest
TOTAL:
E O, ,2
Idle
Forest
TOTAL:
E #
"2§;fi¥t
Other Rural
TOTAL:

F 0,1,2

Forest
F #

asture
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:
GROUP TOTAL:

L-2a

A O 1 2
Were”

Sod Crops
Idle
Fruit
Forest
TOTAL:
B O 1 2
Row Crops
Forest
TOTAL:
GROUP TOTAL:

950

25
212

6,#9#

- 8,#61

380
380

912%?

APPENDIX F (cont'd.)

L-2
i 0,1,2
Row Crops

Small Grains
Sod Crops
Idle
Pasture
Fruit
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:
B 0- 2
Row 0r0ps
Small Grains
Sod 0r0ps
Idle
Pasture
Fruit
Forest
TOTAL:
GROUPuTOTAL:
L-#g
A O 1 2
Row Crops
Small Grains
Forest
TOTAL:
B 0,1,2

Forest
GROUP TOTAL:

L . .
‘=&i 0,1,:

Forest
GROUP TOTAL:

L-Mg .
A 0 1 2
PPUIt
Forest
GROUP TOTAL:

Me

A O 1 2
Row Crops
Small Grains
Sod Crops
Idle
Pasture
Forest

13,123

21#

3.013
1 3%?
'04
1,021

#25

323582

8#7
209
#22
#02
212
992
2,52#

8:733

209
209

570
988

Other Rural
TOTAL:

B O 1 2
Row Crops
Forest

TOTAL:
GROUP TOTAL:

N130

0 1 2
Row Crops
Small Grains
Sod Crops
Idle
Pasture
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:

B O 1 2

"'F3$321

GROUP TOTAL:
8112
A O 1 2
Forest
Elke

A 0 1 2

#Orops
Sod 0r0ps
Idle
Forest
Other Rural

GROUP TOTAL:

818..

0
A O 1 2
#Crops
Small Grains
Idle
Pasture
Forest
Other Rural
GROUP TOTAL:

LRA TOTAL:

2.757

35: 734

209
#02
611

589
380
209
995
209
779
209

3.370

 

1.059.587

APPENDIX G

Land Use By SMU In LRA 98

215

Miscellaneous Forest #1#

A 0,1,2 GROUP TOTAL: 3,027
Row Crops 1,278
Sod Crops kg: 33
Idle A 0,1,2
Pasture 5.306 Small Grains 213
Forest 11.26# Pasture #26
Other Rural 10,992 Other Rural 213
TgTAL: 29.418 TOTAL: 852

B 3, ,5 B 0,3,2
Sod Crops 30“ Row Crops 2,865
Idle 368 Small Grains #26
Forest 1:322 Sod Crops 6,688
TOTAL: 2.#9# Idle #26

C # Pasture 1,278
Row Crops 201 Fruit 1,#91
Pasture 201 Forest 627
Other Rural 201 Other Rural 813
TRTAL' 603 TOTAL: 1#.614

D C 0,1,2
Idle 201 Row Crops 2,128
Forest 603 Small Grains 628
TOTAL: 80# Sod Crops 2.986

E 3E#,5 Pasture 638

orest 1,005 Fruit #25

F 3g#,5 Forest 1.702

orest 201 Other Rural #25

G 354,: TOTAL: 8:932
orest 18# c a

Other Rural 18# Row Crops 212

TOTAL: 368 Small Grains 212

Undetermined Hg‘gifi Sod Crops 200

GROUP TOTAL: , O Pasture 213

0b OTngL: 837
__ D , ,

A 0,1,2 Small Grains 639
Sod CrOps 665 Sod Crops 213
Forest 2.350 Other Rural 213

B OTngL: 3.015 TfiTAL: 1,065
, , D
Small Grains 21% Row Crops 839

GROUP TOTAL: 3: 2 Small Grains 212

Sod Crops 1,278
23 0 1 2 Pasture 323

A , , Forest
Row Crops 1.61# TOTAL: 3.817
Small Grains 1,000 E 0,1,2

Forest 213

216

APPENDIX G (cont'd.)

E 3,#,5 Forest 15,37#
Pasture 6 Other Rural 20,915
GROUP TOTAL: 30.972 TOTAL: 19#,8##
B 3,#,5
;g SodZCrops 213
A 0,1,2 0 0,1,
Row Crops 2,32 Row Crops 10.572
Small Grains .1,91 Small Grains 8,081
Sod Crops 2,257 Sod Crops 16,269
Idle 3,665 Idle 6,058
Pasture 2,325 Pasture 2,125
Fruit 213 Fruit 2,#7#
Forest 2,3#0 Forest 7,673
Other Rural 616 Other Rural #,919
OT0T121L: 15,655 TgTAL: 58,171
B C 3, ,5
Row Crops 8,530 Row Crops 2,097
Small Grains 5.511 Small Grains 1,#85
Sod Crops 6,610 Sod Crops 2,276
Idle 2,512 Idle 2,170
Pasture 626 Pasture #13
Forest 1,688 Fruit 639
Other Rural 1,263 Forest 1,231
TOTAL: 26,z#0 Other Rural 8#3
GROUP TOTAL: 2,397 TOTAL: 11,15#
29.1.2
‘3; 2 Rowlgrgpsi 1.2%;
A 0,1, Sma ra ns
Row Crops 852 Sod Crops 3,555
Small Grains 1.320 Idle 2,678
Sod Crops 3,2#2 Pasture 1,#56
Idle 7 200 Fruit #1#
Pasture 1,053 Forest 3,135
Forest 2,185 Other Rural 2,099
GROUP TOTAL: , 5 TOTAL: 16,111
# 6 8
A 0,1,2 Row Crops 3
Row Crops 2,98# Small Grains 852
Small Grains 2,131 Sod Crops 3,78#
Sod Crops 3,199 Idle 1,#96
Idle 1.073 Pasture 1,231
Fruit V 213 Fruit 213
Forest 6#0 Forest 2,326
Other Rural 213 Other Rural. 1,277
TSTQL: 10,#53 TOTAL: 11,817
E O, , E 0,1,2
Row Crops 52,23# Row Crops 201
Small Grains 32,708 Small Grains #13
Sod Crops ##,55O Idle 212
Idle 15,876 Pasture #02
Pasture #,706 Forest 1,##O
Fruit 8,#81 Other Rural 576
TOTAL: 3,2##

APPENDIX G (cont'd.)

3.3.835
So CrOps

Idle
Pasture
Fruit
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:

F 0,1,2
Row Crops
Fruit
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:

F 3,#,5
Sod Crops
Pasture
Forest
TOTAL:

G 0,1,2
Idle
Forest
TOTAL:

GROUP TOTAL:

1,50

A 0,3,2
Row Crops
Small Grains
Sod Crops
Idle
Pasture
Fruit
FOrest
Other Rural
TOTAL:

B 0,1,2
Row Crops
Small Grains
Sod Crops
Idle *
Pasture
Fruit
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:

GROUP TOTAL:

1,50
A 0,1,2

Row CrOps

217

6#7
8#9

213
1,203

3.954

#20
213
1:599

2.595

201
#1#
1,266
1,881

200
#02

315.037

.231325
152.772

23.361

Small Grains
Sod Crops
Idle

Pasture
Fruit

Forest

Other Rural
TOTAL:

B 0,1,2

Row Crops
Small Grains
Sod Crops
Idle

Pasture
Fruit

Forest
TOTAL:

GROUP TOTAL:

2.5a

1.2.1.2

A

Row Crops
Small Grains
Sod Crops
Idle
Pasture
Fruit
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:

[.1

Sod Crops
Other Rural
TOTAL:

B 0,1,2

B

Row CrOps
Small Grains
Sod Crops
Idle
Pasture
Fruit
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:

11

Row Crops
Sod Crops
Pasture
Forest
TOTAL:

C 0,1,2

Row Crops

1#.339
18.772
7.039
7.090
201
35.2uu
#.319

106,365

#50
213
1,065
212
213
213
2,106

118.8%

10.090
12,502
15.099
3.407
3,#20
2,172
7.157
1.938
55.785

213
182
395

121,1#7

117.3##
126,070

#1,0#8
13,007

“.637
92.432
35.733

551,#18

893
#50
216
213
1.772

27.294

APPENDIX 0 (cont'd.)

Small Grains
Sod Crops
Idle

Pasture
Fruit

Forest

Other Rural
TOTAL:

0.3%.:
0w Crops

Small Grains
Sod Crops
Idle

Pasture
Fruit

Forest

Other Rural
TOTAL:

D 0,1,2

Row Crops
Small Grains
Sod Crops
Idle

Pasture
Forest

Other Rural
TOTAL:

.2.3.&.5

Row Crops
Small Grains
Sod Crops
Idle

Pasture
Forest

Other Rural
TOTAL:

E 0,1,2

Row Crops
Small Grains
Sod Crops
Idle

Pasture
Fruit

Forest
0ther~Rural
TOTAL:

#

Row Crops
Small Grains
Sod Crops
Idle

218

27.890
#2,931
20,689
7,121
210
20,270
12,8#6

159.251

5.3119
#,181
8,5#2
8,125
1,052
2#1
15:
1,223
29,167

2.153
6,087
8,782
#,1#6
2.753
10,7#7
1.925
36.593

2.780
2,808
11,016
5.985
6,301
3.692
2,678
35,260

1,06#
1,288
999
#,002
860
630
5.327
3,#81
17,651

1,065

651
3.710
1.951

2.

F

Pasture
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:

F 0,1,2

Small Grains
Idle
Pasture
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:

#

Idle

Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:

GROUP TOTAL:

a-s

2.2.1.2

Row Crops
Small Grains
Sod Crops
Idle

Pasture
Fruit

Other Rural
TOTAL:

B 0,1,2

Row Crops
Small Grains
Sod Crops
Idle

Forest

Other Rural
TOTAL:

9.2.1.2

C

Row Crops
Small Grains
Sod Crops
Idle

Forest

Other Rural
TOTAL:

#

Other Rural

D 0,1,2

Sod Crops
Idle
TOTAL:

E 0,1,2

Sod Crops

1:276
2.963
8#9
12,#65

202
6#8
216
2.267

3.788

216
#15
202

7677378

1.712
832
212
788
382
382
810

5.118

2,9#0
3,216

2.063
15.203

1,306

202
216

621
3.646

202
608
###
1,052

202

APPENDIX G (cont'd.)

E

Forest
TOTAL:

[.1

Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:

GROUP TOTAL:

2,5b

A 0,1,2'

Row Crops
Small Grains
Sod Crops
Idle

Pasture
Fruit

Forest

Other Rural
TOTAL:

B 0,1,2

Row Crops
Small Grains
Sod Crops
Idle

Pasture
Fruit

Forest

Other Rural
TOTAL:

GROUP TOTAL:
2 e Eb'S

A O 1 2
Row Crops

Small Grains
Sod Crops
Idle

Forest

Other Rural
TOTAL:

B 0,1,2

Row Crops
Small Grains
Sod Crops
Idle

Fruit

Forest

Other Rural
TOTAL:

GROUP TOTAL:

219

202
#0#

202
807

1,002
0

79.593
50.327
52.222
17.705
7.759
589
21.306
17,161

2#6,702

#9,206
#7,263
01,586
10,556
5.##9
868
22,701
10,010

21321373

8,320
5.338
5.523
2.052
2.918
1,003
25.550

1.257
2.778
2.5#7
868
213
1,688
202
9 7

2.9.1.2

Row Crops
Small Grains
Sod Crops
Idle

Pasture
Fruit

Forest

Other Rural
TOTAL:

2.2.1.2

Row Crops
Small Grains
Sod Crops
Idle

Pasture
Fruit

Forest

Other Rural
TOTAL:

GROUP TOTAL:

A 0,1,2

Row CrOps
Small Grains
Sod Crops
Idle

Forest

GROUP TOTAL:

Row Crops
Small Grains
Sod Crops
Idle

Pasture
Forest

Other Rural
TOTAL:

22.1.2

Row Crops
Sod Crops
Idle
TOTAL:

GROUP TOTAL:
2.5c-cs

2.0.1.2

Row Crops

63.778
33.278
39.#87
7.9#9
9.257
200
29.506
14.071

197.530

#,623
5.885
2,10#
1,269

633

210
2.323
1.#71

2:8:318

2,818
#,117
2,802
1,31#

3.025
1,07#
16,003

202

1,211
212

#122

832

APPENDIX G (cont'd.)

32
A 0,1,2-

Forest

GROUP TOTAL:

Row Crops
Small Grains
Sod Crops
Idle

Pasture
Fruit

Forest

Other Rural
TOTAL:

B O 1 2 -
Row CrOps

Small Grains
Sod Crops
Idle

Pasture
Fruit

Forest

Other Rural
TOTAL:

L1» .

Row Crops
Small Grains
Sod Crops
Idle

Other Rural
TOTAL:

C 0,1,2

Row Crops
Small Grains
Sod Crops
Idle

Pasture
Fruit ~
Forest.
Other Rural
TOTAL:

#

Row Crops
Small Grains
Sod CrOps
Idle

Pasture
Forest

Other Rural
TOTAL:

D 0,1,2

Row Crops

220

20#
1.03

50.033
24.403
38.719
16,#6#
1,225
6#5
10,360
11,858
153.711

129.582
73.513
137.373
54.805
15.632
3.283
#9,102
41,710
505,000

210
6#1
1,##8
63#
672
3.609

32.199
18,052
#0,98#
20.195
10.393
673
2#,#35
17.508
164.939

5.367
8,#61
5,880
4.570
2.693
2.33#
2.093
31.398

1.678

Small Grains
Sod CrOps
Idle

Pasture
Fruit

Forest

Other Rural
TOTAL:

11

Row Crops
Small Grains
Sod Crops
Idle

Pasture
Forest

Other Rural
TOTAL:

E 0,1,2

Small Grains
Sod Crops
Idle

Pasture
Forest

Other Rural
TOTAL:

11

Row Crops
Small Grains
Sod Crops
Idle

Pasture
Forest

Other Rural
TOTAL:

F 0,1,2

Row Crops
Sod Crops
Idle
Pasture
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:

A

Small Grains
Sod Crops
Pasture
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:

GROUP TOTAL:

5.158
1,026

7.193

213
68#
2,#2#
1,222
191
a .730

970,182

221
APPENDIX 0 (cont'd.)

33. Small Grains 1,602
A 0,1,2 Sod Crops 1,935
Row Crops 17,617 Idle 1,3#O
Small Grains 8,601 Pasture 552
Sod Crops 8,025 Forest 813
Idle 2,107 Other Rural 2
Pasture 1 ,#92 GROUP TOTAL: 8,835
Forest 3. 391
Other Rural 2 ,78# 311a
TOTAL: ## ,017 A 0,1,2
B O 1 2 Row Crops 212
Row Crops 11,837 Small Grains 637
Small Grains 7,661 TOTAL: 8#9
Sod Crops 10,#92 B 0,1,2
Idle 2,581 Row Crops 2,513
Pasture 1,259 Small Grains 1,071
Forest 8, 709 Sod Crops 1,297
Other Rural h3,1#3 Forest #29
TOTAL: #3,682 Other Rural 857
GROUP TOTAL: . 9 TOTAL: 6,167
. - 0 0,1,2
3b-s ' Row CrOps 212
A Oil,2 Forest 212
ow CrOps 621 TOTAL: #2#
Small Grains 1,2#2 F 0,3,2
Sod Crops 615 Forest #25
Idle #02 GROUP TOTAL: 7, 7
Pasture 603
Forest 2, 268 3110
Other Rural 1,005 A 0,1,2
TOTAL: 6756 Row Crops 81#
B 0,1,2 Small Grains 598
Idle 210 Sod CrOps 86?
GROUP TOTAL: 3:935 Idle 999
Forest #31
0 Other Rural 212
A 0,1,2 TOTAL: 3,921
Row Crops 6,257 B 0,1,2
Small Grains 5,825 Row Crops #25
Sod Crops 5,03# Small Grains 212
Idle 6,919 Sod Crops #10
Pasture 5,232 Idle 212
Forest 23,17# Forest #1#
Other Rural 2, 299 TOTAL: 3,623
TOTAL: 5#, 7#O GROUP TOTAL: ,59
B 0,1,2
Row CrOps 210 312a
GROUP TOTAL: 55,951 A 0,1,2
Row Crops 1,##8
30-s _ Small Grains 2,138
A 0,3,2 Sod Crops 1,291
Row Crops 2,039 Idle 1,089

APPENDIX G (cont'd.)

Pasture
Other Rural
TOTAL:

9.9.1.2
Row Crops
Small Grains
Sod Crops
Idle
Pasture
Fruit
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:

B 3,#,5
Sod-Crops

9.0.9.2
ow Crops

Small Grains
Sod CrOps
Idle
Pasture
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:
9.3.3.5
Row Crops
Small Grains
Sod CrOps
Idle -
Pasture
TOTAL:

D 0 1 2
SmaIl Grains

Sod Crops
Idle
Forest
TOTAL:

D 3,#,5
Small Grains
Forest
TOTAL:

E 0,1,2 .
Sod Crops
Forest
TOTAL:

F 0,1,2
Forest

GROUP TOTAL:

.3122

A 0,1,2
Row Crops

222

#32
1,078

E17179

7.991

Small Grains
Sod Crops
Idle

Pasture
Forest

Other Rural
TOTAL:

B 0,1,2

Row Crops
Small Grains
Sod Crops
Idle

Pasture
Forest

Other Rural
TOTAL:

GROUP TOTAL:

2.9.1.2

Row Crops
Small Grains
Sod Crops
Idle
Pasture
Forest

Other Rural
TOTAL:

B 0,1,2

Row Crops

GROUP TOTAL:

2.9.1.2

Row Crops
Small Grains
Sod Crops
Idle

Pasture
Fruit

Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:

9.9.1.2

Row Crops
Small Grains
Sod CrOps
Idle

Pasture
Fruit

Forest

3.5a“
11.299
2.771
1.033
3.539
2.601
32.778

1,661
2.939
#,206
1.255
1,011

787
1.880

272517

1,686
1,288
1.628

113,07#

62,318

118,786

73.833
21,#8#

“.397
##,#25

APPENDIX G (cont'd.)

Other Rural
TOTAL:
B 3,#,5
Row Crops
Small Grains
Sod Craps
Forest
TOTAL:
9.9.1.2
Row Crops
Small Grains
Sod Crops
Idle
Pasture
Fruit‘
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:
C 3ihgi .
Row Crops
Small Grains
Sod Crops
Idle
Pasture
Fruit
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:

D O 1 2
Row Crops
Small Grains
Sod Crops
Idle
Pasture
Fruit
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:

D 3,#,5 .
Row Crops
Small Grains
Sod Crops
Idle
Pasture
Fruit
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:

E 0,1,2
Row Crops

223

3“.9h8

“73.265

207
#48
690
236
1.581

30,821
20,646
51.530
30,608
21.22“

2.526
31.591
15.133

20“.079

3.269
5:307
12,u71

3:20?
73:17?

3.012
3.915
10.276
6.788
7.963
153
15.853
“.676
52,136

202

Small Grains
Sod Crops
Idle
Pasture
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:

E 3.4.5
Row Crops
Small Grains
Sod CrOps
Idle
Pasture
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:

F O 1 2
Sod Crops
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:

F 3.4.5
Small Grains
Sod Crops
Pasture
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:

GROUP TOTAL:

2‘ fia-m

1.9.1.2
Row Crops

Small Grains
Sod Crops
Idle
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:

B 0,1,2
Row CrOps
Small Grains
Sod Crops
Idle
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:

C 0,1,2 .
Small Grains
Sod Crops

844
2:277
b.187
15.603
12.376

1.26h
35.753

1.033
829
6.709
9,892
5.903
8,512
3.079
30.907

#13
8.601
1.076

10.090

203
412
601
1.048
nan
2 08

1.150.095

15.766
6,871
5:005

211
1,16h
1,0h6

30.063

5.222
3.0h6
8.776
610
1.537
435

19.626

399
399

APPENDIX G (cont'd.)

22#

Forest 238 W
TOTAL: 1.036 Row Crops 1.#36
C 3,#,5 Sod Crops #13
Sod Craps 707 Pasture 665
D 3,#,5 Forest 1. 607
Forest 222 Other Rural 1.651
GROUP TOTAL: 51.353 TOTgL: 5. 772
, C 0
3(52 Row Crops 619
A Ofi;.2 Sod Craps 619
ow Crops 21.#7O Idle 206
Small Grains 10.892 Forest #0#
Sod Crops 15.726 Other Rural #13
Idle 7. .212 TOTQL: 2.261
Pasture 5. 52 D O 1
Forest 8. #80 Sod Crops 206
Other Rural 3. 534 Forest #13
TOTAL: 73.066 Other Rural #13
B 031.2 TOTAL: 1.032
ow Crops 2.8#1 D #
Small Grains 1.707 Forest 197
Sod Crops 2.167 F #
Idle 8#1 Forest -#_%%2
Pasture 633 GROUP TOTAL: 1 . 1
Forest 1.459
Other Total gg9 c 2
TOTAL: 2. Z A 0.1.
GROUP TOTAL: :933 Sod Crabs 619
Pasture #1
3159 A0 1 2 GROUP TOTAL: 1.032
Row Cropsi 2%.8#2 fig
Small Gra ns .52 AB 0 1 2
Sod Crops 10.208 Row Crops 7#,O6#
Idle 8.3#7 Small Grains #5.#86
Pasture 6 .568 Sod Crops 76.987
Forest. 3#. 220 Idle 56.973
Other Rural 8 .387 Pasture 29.1#3
TOTgL: 98.099 Fruit #6. 853
B 0.1. Forest
Pasture #02 Other Rural 27.126
GROUP TOTAL: 93.501 TOEAL: 358.600
AB 3! .5
313a I le 1 .#91
A 0.1.2 Forest 1.065
Row Crops 206 TOTAL: 2 .556
Sod Crops 206 0 0.1.2
Pasture #13 Row Crops 15.002
Forest 2.095 Small Grains 11.363
Other Rural 1.238 Sod 0r0ps 27.129
TOTAL: # .158 Idle 16.510

APPENDIX G (cont'd.)

Pasture
Fruit
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:

0 3.#.§ -
ow Crops

Small Grains
Sod Crops
Idle
Pasture
Forest
TOTAL:

D 0.1.2
Row Crops
Small Grains
Sod Crops
Idle
Pasture
Forest,
Other.Rural
TOTAL:

D 3.#.51
Row Crops
Small Grains
Sod Crops
Idle
Pasture
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:

E 0.1.2
Row Crops
Sod'Crops
Idle
Pasture
Forest
TOTAL:

2.1.3.5
Sma l Grains

Sod Crops
Idle
Pasture
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:

F O 1 2
Idle
Pasture

Forest
TOTAL:

225

7:392
2.121
29.112
7.181

115.810

£L3.&31
So Crops

Idle
Pasture
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:
GROUP TOTAL:

W
Row Crops

Small Grains

Sod 0r0ps

Idle

Pasture

Forest

Other Rural
GROUP TOTAL:

"' AB 0 1 2
Row Crops

Small Grains

Sod Crops

Idle

Pasture

Forest

Other Rural
GROUP TOTAL:

#[1a

22.9.1.2
Forest
Other Rural

GROUP TOTAL:

1119

AB 0.1.2
Row Crops

Small Grains

Sod Crops

Idle

Pasture

Forest

Other Rural
GROUP TOTAL:

#110

AB 0.1.2
Row Crops

639
910
650
2.767
212
a 682

582.579

98.535
19.667
29.107
18. 937
19. 62#
32, 803

5.751%}

17.145
5.176
11.972
7.735
11.987
57.930
4 1

...4dZL.
115:977

APPENDIX G (cont'd.)

Small Grains
Sod Crops
Idle

Pasture
Forest

GROUP TOTAL:

#ZZa

AB 0.1.2
Row rops

Small Grains
Sod Crops
Idle-
Pasture
Fruit

Forest

Other Rural
TOTAL:

9.9.1.2
ow Crops

Small Grains
Sod Crops
Idle

Paéture
Forest

Other Rural
TOTAL:

9—2F%:§st

Other Rural
TOTAL:

D 0.1.2

D

Row Crops
Small Grains
Idle
Pasture
Forest
Other.Rural
TOTAL:

#

Sod Crops
Pasture
Forest
TOTAL:

“£13

Pasture
Forest
TOTAL:

GROUP TOTAL:

226

1.255
1.657
201
402

# 2b

AB 0.1.2

Row Crops
Small Grains
Sod Crops
Idle

Pasture
Forest

Other Rural

GROUP TOTAL:

#ZZb—s

AB 0.1.2

Row 0r0ps
Small Grains

GROUP TOTAL:

212.9.

AB 0.1.2
ow Crops

Small Grains
Sod Crops
Idle

Pasture
Fruit

Forest

Other Rural

GROUP TOTAL:

AB 0.1.2

Row Crops
Small Grains
Sod Crops
Idle
Pasture
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:

#
Idle
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:

9.9.1.2

Row Crops
Small Grains
Sod Crops
Idle

Pasture

7.210
6,#22
11.856
10.65#
2.038
35.598
6,#87
81.215

736
1.007
18#
1.927

2.112

638
3,611
1.057
2.786

APPENDIX G (cont'd.)

Forest
TOTAL:

9.3.2.3
ow Crops

Idle
Pasture
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:

0 1 2

D
Sod Crops

Idle '
Pasture
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:

D 3.#.§
pw Crops

Small Grains
Sod Crops
Idle '
Pasture
Forest
Other-Rural
TOTAL:

E O 1 2
Sod Crops

E
F

Idle
Pasture
Forest
TOTAL:

‘#
Forest

1. .
Other Rural

GROUP TOTAL:

jg

AB 0.1.2

AB

Row Crops
Small Grains
Sod Crops
Idle
Pasture
Fruit
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:

#
Forest

GROUP TOTAL:

227

6.126
16.330

213
1.637
202
1.688
18#
3.924

212
615
1,##5
3.997
#23
6.692

665
#26
#26
8##
206
#06
222

3.195

213
206
225
2.825
3,469

1.278

rim-311:}

jb-h

A; 0.1.2
ow Crops

Small Grains
Idle

Pasture
Forest

Other Rural

GROUP TOTAL:

32

AB 0.1.2

Row Crops
Small Grains
Sod Crops
Idle

Pasture
Fruit

Forest

Other Rural

GROUP TOTAL:

5o-a

A; 0.1.2
So Crops

Idle
Forest

GROUP TOTAL:

3122

12.9.12

Row Crops
Small Grains
Sod Crops
Idle

Pasture
Forest

Other Rural
TOTAL:

m2

Row Crops
Small Grains
Sod Crops
Idle

Pasture
Forest

Other Rural
TOTAL:

9.9.1.2

D

82d Crops
Sod Crops

813
63#
423
214
4.111

3.393

APPENDIX G (cont'd.)

F

Idle
TOTAL:
1.:

Forest

GROUP TOTAL:

3129

AB 0.1.2
ow rope

AB

Small Grains
Sod Crops
Idle
Pasture
Fruit
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:

#
Forest

GROUP TOTAL:

5: :8

..1

AB 9.1.2
ROW rops

Small Grains
Sod Crops
Idle

Pasture
Fruit

Forest

Other Rural
TOTAL:

981%?

Pasture
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:

C 0.1.2

Row Crops
Small'Grains
Sod Crops
Idle

Pasture
Forest

Other Rural
TOTAL:

2.3.325

Row Creps‘
Small Grains
Sod Crops
Idle

228

212
616

257%?

15.505
8:510
23.756
15.970
3.591

20.010

17#.0#7

1.161
18#

1,#85
#O#
3.234

2.962
1.867
3.781
7.952
1.271
19.922
2.081
39.836

419
639
214

1.621

Pasture
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:

D O 1 2
$08 Crops
Idle
Pasture
Fruit
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:

D 3.#.§
Small Grains
Sod Crops
Idle
Pasture
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:

E 0.1.2
Sod Crops
Idle
Pasture
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:

E 3.#.5
Sod Crops
Idle
Pasture
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:

F 0.1.2
Sod Crops
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:

F 3.#.§
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:

G 0 1 2
Forest

GROUP TOTAL:

8
22.9.1.2
Row Crops
Small Grains
Sod Crops

1.260
1.050
1.680

APPENDIX G (cont'd.)

Idle

Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:

AB g.#.§
orest

C O 1 2
Row Crops
Small Grains
Sod Crops
Idle
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:

D 0.1.2
Forest

F O 1 2
Pasture

Forest
TOTAL:

G O 1 2
Forest

GROUP TOTAL:

L-Za

A O 1 2
SmaIl Grains

Sod Crops
Pasture
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:

B 0.1.2
Small Grains
Sod Crops
Idle
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:

GROUP TOTAL:

L-Zbc

A 0.1.2
Row Crops
Small‘Grains
Sod Crops
Idle
Pasture
Fruit
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:

229

2.9#0
19.951
630
.27.511

3.613

1.050
2.100
2.310
2.520
13.759
607
22.3#6

1.366

18#

736
920

2.§f0

213
1.065
213
1.279
1,#19
#,189

399
6#0
190
427
637

973-53

20.692
17.439
18.742
12.409
17,052
213
76.815
25.903
188.765

B O 1 2
Row Crops
Small Grains
Sod Crops
Idle
Pasture
Fruit
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:

0 0.1.2
Idle

GROUP TOTAL:

-#a

 

O 2

Small Grains
Sod Crops
Idle

Pasture
Forest

Other Rural
TOTAL:

B 0.1.2 .
Small Grains
Sod Crops
Idle
Pasture
Forest
TOTAL:

9.9.1.2
Row Crops
Small Grains
Forest
TOTAL:

GROUP TOTAL:

L-#bc

1.9.1.2
Row Crops

Idle
Pasture
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:
2.9.1.2
Pasture
Forest
TOTAL:
GROUP TOTAL:

211
#23
1.030

10.520

#10

12.59#

213
1,#85

1.688

APPENDIX G (cont'd.)
L-Mc

A 0.1.2
ow Crops

Sod Crops
Idle
Pasture
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:

B O 1 2
Forest
GROUP TOTAL:

;--

A 0.1.2'
Row Crops
Small-Grains
Sod Crops
Idle ’
Pasture
Fruit.
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:
#
Pasture
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:

B O 1 2
Idle 1
Forest .
Other‘Rural
TOTAL:

D 0.1.2;
Forest.

GROUP TOTAL:

Mc-a .-
A 0' 2
So Crops
Idle '
Forest
OtherwRural
GROUP TOTAL:

MAI;

2.9.1.2
Small Grains
Sod Crops
Pasture
Forest

GROUP TOTAL:

 

230

213
6#0
397
1.898
9.602

3. 392
16.1#2

Row Crops

Small Grains

Sod Crops
Idle
Pasture
Forest
Other Rural
GROUP TOTAL:

2.9.1.2
Row Crops

Small Grains

Sod Crops
Idle
Pasture
Forest
Other Rural
GROUP TOTAL:

Mch

2.9.1.2
Row Crops

Small Grains

Sod Crops
Idle.
Pasture
Forest
Other Rural
GROUP TOTAL:

9;
9.9.1.2
orest
E O 1 2
eForest
GROUP TOTAL:
LRA TOTAL:

1.278

#,172
1.313
# .350
3.160

812%

7.261
1 .#76
2. 96#

5.391
639
1. 864
2.385
217
10.400

22:27—79

217

fiéfi

7.819.067

APPENDIX H

Land Use By SMU In LRA 99

231

Miscellaneous B 0.1.2
A 0.1.2 Row Crops 3.065
orest 652 Small Grains 5.5#5
Undetermined 18 O Sod CrOps 3.112
: 18.76% Idle 2.892
Pasture 1.083
93 Fruit 1.125
A 0.1.2 - Forest 3.827
Row Crops 7.780 Other Rural 900
Small Grains 217 TOTAL: 2%.5#;
Sod Crops 1.050 GROUP TOTAL: 10 .O
Other Rural 2
GROUP TOTAL: 9.2%; 15;
2.9.1.2
LE. 2 - Row Crops 53.003
2_9§1.2 Small Grains 1#,96#
ow Crops 1.3#9 Sod Crops 12.766
Sod Crops 225 Idle 15.351
Idle 225 Pasture ##2
Other Rural #50 Forest 12.278
TOTAL: 2.2#9 Other Rural 3.103
B 0.1.21 G i 217 B OT$TAL: 111.907
ma ra ns - 1 :
Forest #50 Row Crops 20#
TgTAL: 667 Sod Crops £0:
0 O. . TOTAL: 0
Row Crops #31 GROUP TOTAL: 112.313
Sod Crops 217
TOTAL: 6#8 1.5a
C 3.#.5 « A 0.1.2
Row Crops 217 Row Crops 2.670
D 3.#.5 Small Grains #09
e #50 Sod Crops 1.311
E 0.;.2 t 6 # Idle g2:
ores Pasture
GROUP TOTAL: 5.902 Forest 652
. TOTAL: 6.362
B O.;.2
0.1.2 ‘ Row Crops 13.2#8
Row Crops 29.989 Small Grains 13.9#1
Small Grains 9.#1# Sod Crops 17.021
Sod Crops 9.853 Idle 5.602
Idle 11.036 Pasture 1.770
Pasture # .553 Fruit 1.317
Forest 12 .883 Forest 1.980
Other Rural 2.809 Other Rural 2.885
TOTAL: 80 .537 TOTAL: 57. 76#

APPENDIX H (cont'd.)

332

B 3.#.§ Forest 8.817
e 225 Other Rural 21#,325
C 0.1.2 TOTAL: 35. 5
Row Crops 1.0## B 0.1.2
Small Grains 1.907 Row Crops 15.381
Sod Crops 1.117 Small Grains 6.637
Idle 1.200 Sod Crops 7.9##
Pasture 857 Idle 3.056
Forest 2.803 Pasture 6#1
TETAL: 8.928 Forest 5.:17
C 3. .5 Other Rural 2. 99
Sod CrOps 225 TOTAL: “1.223
Idle #50 GROUP TOTAL: 277. 1
TOTAL: 675
D O 2 c
asture 217 A O 1 2
Other Rural 21# Row Crops 193.975
TOTAL: ' #31 Small Grains 92.036
D 2# Sod Crops 5#.O66
Idle 225 Idle 28.122
Other.Rural 195 Pasture 8.139
TOTAL: 420 Fruit 195
E O 1 2. Forest 38.130
Forest 229 Other Rural 25.579
E 3§#.5 TOTAL: ##O.2#2
ow Crops 225 B 0.1.2
Small Grains 225 Row Crops 5#5
Sod Crops 225 Forest 182
Idle :28 Other Rural Zfiz
Pasture TOTAL:
Forest 225 GROUP TOTAL: EETTTEE
0TOTAL: 1.800
F .1.2 2.5a
Forest #,715 A 0.1.2
Other Rural #57 ‘ Row Crops #,606
TOTAL: 5.172 Small Grains 3.781
F 3.#.5 Sod Crops 7.58#
Idle 225 Idle 210
Pasture 225 Other Rural 2.035
Forest 1 1.3;? OTOTAL: 18.216
Other Rura B
TOTAL: 1.250 Row Crops 36.708
GROUP TOTAL: 3.755 Small Grains 21.#06
Sod Crops 20.310
1.50 Idle #,838
A 0.1.2 Pasture 1,2#7
Row Crops 130.031 Fruit #27
Small Grains #8.66# Forest #,#52
Sod Crops 25.#58 Other Rural #,822
Idle 3.3%: TOTAL: 9#.210
Pasture . 0 0.1.2
Fruit 153 Row Crops 11.326

Small Grains 10.002

APPENDIX H (cont'd.)

Sod Crops,
Idle

Fruit
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:

9.3.9.3
ow Crops

Small Grains
Sod Crops
Idle

Fruit

TOTAL:

99.1.2
ow Crops

Small Grains
Sod Crops
Idle

Pasture
Forest -
Other Rural
TOTAL: -

1g

ow Crops
Sod Crops
Fruit
Other Rural
TOTAL:

3 0.1.2 '
So Crops

E

Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:

‘# .
Row10rops
Pasture ,
Other Rural
TOTAL:

GROUP_TOTAL:

2 a-s

A .1.2

Row CrOps

B O 1 2
Row Crops

Sod Crops
Idle
Fruit
Forest
TOTAL:

GROUP TOTAL:

233

11.555
3.601
21#
2.303
2.056

#1.057

8#5
2.090
1.275

430

427
5.067

220
220
225

2.163

1.050
440
430

#.7#8

1.537
6#9
427

621
3.234

220
881

399
1.500

225
225
225

115%

Row Crops
Small Grains
Sod Crops
Idle

Pasture
Fruit

Forest

Other Rural
TOTAL:

B 0.1.2

Row Crops
Small Grains
Sod Crops
Idle

Pasture
Fruit

Forest

Other Rural
TOTAL:

GROUP TOTAL:

2 e ib'fi
A 0.1.2

Row Crops

2.5b-s
A 0.1.2

Row CrOps
Small Grains
Sod Crops
Idle

Pasture
Fruit

Forest

Other Rural
TOTAL:

29.1.2

Row CrOps
Small Grains
Sod CrOps
Idle

Pasture
Forest

Other Rural
TOTAL:

GROUP TOTAL:
2 e ib-CS

2.9.1.2

Row Crops
Small Grains

5.
126.222
539.?

171.733

95.367
67.#85
2#.82#
8.285
592
13.583
31.196

#13.065

90.393
1283
6:766
2.7“0
855
7.073
541

217

32.729
13.161
13.#02
2.950
2.716
191
8.271
3.342
76.762

8.191
2.610
5.731

APPENDIX H (cont'd.)

Sod Crops
Pasture
Forest
Other Rural
GROUP TOTAL:

2. c

A 0.1.2
Row Crops
Small Grains
Sod Crops
Idle
Pasture
Fruit
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:

B 0,1,2
Row Craps
Small Grains
Sod Crops
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:

GROUP.TOTAL:

Small Grains

Sod Crops

Idle

Forest

Other Rural.
GROUP TOTAL:

2 c-s».

A 0.1.2:,
Row Crops
Small.Grains
Sod Crops
Idle
Pasture
Fruit
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:

B 0.1.2
Row Crops
Small Grains
Forest
TOTAL:

GROUP TOTAL:

234

1.681
210
210

2.73%?

199.227
101.765

86,83u
15.896
1u.o67

236
43.285
2h,663

485.973

210
210
210
225
385
1 zno

3%

1.9.1.2

Row Crops
Small Grains
Sod Crops
Idle

Pasture
Forest

Other Rural
TOTAL:

8 0.1.2

Row Craps
Small Grains
Sod Craps
Idle

Forest

Other Rural
TOTAL:

C 0.1.2

C

Row Crops
Small Grains
Sod Crops
Idle
Pasture
Fruit
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:

14,

Row Crops
Idle

TOTAL:

D 0.1.2

E

Row Crops
Forest
TOTAL:

4

Other Rural

GROUP TOTAL:

32

A 0.1.2

Row Crops
Small Grains
Sod Craps
Idle '
Forest
TOTAL:

B 0.1.2

Row Crops
Small Grains
Sod CrOps
Pasture

5.0h5
4.119
2.85u
2.329
153
98a
1.525
17.009

3.861
3.375
a.aa?
363
n.867
1.705
18.258

1,#51
1.27a
2.073
153
637
482
auo
60a

7.51“

225
225
use

#20
420
8RD

200
55.271

2.729
1.h65
8##

1.995

3.998
10.531

1.515
6AA

210
210

20-8

1119.

APPENDIX H (cont'd.)

Forest
TOTAL:
GROUP TOTAL:

3b-s

A O 1 2
$08 0r0ps
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:

B O 1 2
SmaIl Grains
Sod Crops
TOTAL:

GROUP TOTAL:

1.9.11.2».
Row Crops

Small Grains
Sod Crops
Pasture
Forest

GROUP TOTAL:

1141.112.
Row Crops
Small Grains
Sod Crops
Idle
Forest
Other Rural
GROUP‘TOTAL:

A 0.1.2

Row Crops
Small Grains
Sod Crops
Idle

Pasture
Forest 1
Other Rural
TOTAL:

la-91-311%

GROUP TOTAL

2£2_a

A 0.1.2
Row Crops

235

217

531%

217
652
217
1.086

uau
217

113%

#57
195
uuo
217
2 1 o

3.

1.050
h.b25
2.318

210
1.905

707%

24,031
7.636
10.053
5.678
1.053
7.290
3.608
59.349

397993

5.874

Small Grains
Sod Crops
Idle
Fruit
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:
B 0.1.2
Row Crops
Small Grains
Sod Crops
Idle
Pasture
Fruit
Other Rural
TOTAL:
2.9.11;
Row CrOps
Small Grains
Sod Crops
Idle
Other Rural
TOTAL:
D 0.1.2
Row 0r0ps
GROUP TOTAL:

1421.5

1.2.1.;
Row Crops
Small Grains
Sod Crops
Idle
Pasture
Fruit
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:

B O 1 2
--R3¢-Grops

Small Grains
Sod Crops
Idle
Fruit
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:

GROUP TOTAL:

12.0

A 0.1.2
Row Crops

2,476
4,394
#57
191
869
1.389
15.600

2.955
3.308

2.335
881

660
220
657
11.016

1.024
1.101
#40
894
220
3.679

#40

30.735

57.907
16.691
13.56“
8.899
1.995
577
9.385
6,831

11h.8h9

2.667
6.060
2.203
1.276

881

803
1.h13

.151222
130.153

27.1“1

1152

21.52

APPENDIX H (cont'd.)

Small Grains
Sod Crops
Idle

Pasture
Forest

Other Rural
TOTAL:

B O 1 2
Row Crops
Sod Crops
Idle
TOTAL:
GROUP TOTAL:

0 2
Row Crops
Small Grains
Idle
Pasture
Forest
TOTAL
'B Ofi;.2
ow Craps
Small Grains
Sod Crops
Idle
Pasture
Forest
Other~Rural
TOTAL:
C 0.1.2
Row Crops
Small Grains
SodzCrops
Forest
TOTAL:
E 0.1.2
Forest
GROUP TOTAL:

1 .
A.O.1.2
Row Crops
Small Grains
Sod Crops
Idle
Pasture
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:

B 0.1.2
Row CrOps

6.292
2.227
1.1u6
62#
818
2,218
#58
19,003

881

Small Grains
Idle
Forest
TOTAL:

GROUP TOTAL:

3.15;

A 0.1.2
Row Craps

Small Grains

Sod Crops

Idle

Pasture

Forest

Other Rural
GROUP TOTAL:

3A2

1.2.1.2
Idle
Pasture
Forest
TOTAL:

B 0.1.2
Forest

9.2.112.
Forest

GROUP TOTAL:

3138c

ha

A 0.1.2
Row Crops

AB 0.1.2
Row Crops
Small Grains
Sod Crops
Idle
Pasture
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:
AB 3.0.:
Small Grains
Idle
Other Rural
TOTAL:
9.2.1.2..
Row Crops
Small Grains
Sod Crops
Idle

881

191
382
870

435

652
2.530

220

APPENDIX H (cont'd.)

Pasture
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:

4

Sod Craps
Other Rural
TOTAL:

0

Row Crops
Idle

Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:

W
Clo-P
0

Forest
TOTAL:
GROUPvTOTAL:

£2 .
12.2.1.2
Row Crops
Small Grains
Sod Crops

Forest
Other Rural
GROUP TOTAL:

93 .

AB 0 1 2
Row Crops
Small Grains
Sod Crops
Idle.
Pasture
Forest

Other Rural
GROUP TOTAL:

237

131
1.871
1.266
7.304

20#
20#
#08

#20
220
640

21a
907
621

20#

1.832
62#
20#

2.660

20#
611

38.73%

58.135
19.607
19,183
12.11u
2,962
420

2

its?

1h,8h9
6.999
5.069
5,086
2.811
26.709
2 082

33.305

Forest

AB 0.1.2
Row Crops

Small Grains

Sod Crops

Idle

Pasture

Fruit

Forest

Other Rural
GROUP TOTAL:

12.2.1.2
Row Crops

Small Grains
Sod Crops
Pasture
Forest

GROUP TOTAL:

AB 0.1.2
Row Crops
Small Grains
Sod 0r0ps
Idle
Pasture
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:

0 0.1.2
Row Crops
Small Grains
Sod Crops
Idle
Pasture
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:

C 3,#,5
Idle

D O 2
Row Crops

GROUP TOTAL:

2.916
2.229
869
1.623
3.442
11.079

2.572
726
1,000
3.975
217
1.149
1.453
11.392

617
855
1.085
490
236
637

558
9,828

217

17.—32%

APPENDIX H (cont'd.)

“(Zb

22.2.1.2
Row Crops 7
Small Grains
Sod Crops
Idle
Pasture
Fruit
Forest
Other Rural

GROUP TOTAL:

hi2b-s;.

AB 0‘1 2
Row Crops
Small Grains
Sod Crops
Idle
Feature
Forest
Other Rural

GROUP TOTAL:

OZZc -’
1221.2
Row Crops
Small Grains
Sod‘Crops
Idle
Pasture
Fruit
Forest
OtherkRural

GROUP'TOTAL:

h12c-c~ . '
AB 0.1;2 ;
Row Crops
Small Grains
Idle
Other Rural
GROUPVTOTAL:

52
a; 0.1.2

How Crops
Small Grains
Idle

Pasture
Forest

Other Rural
TOTAL:

238

21.700

8.205
6.275
8,367
3.372

13.876

5.306
58h
#71

27%?

195
801
21#
867
5.h21
20#

7.702

0 0.1.2
Row Crops

Pasture
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:

i—ngrgst
'-_2F3$§st

E O 1 2
Pasture

E 3,#,5
Forest

GROUP TOTAL:

52

AB 0.1.2
Row 0r0ps
Small Grains
Sod Crops
Idle
Pasture
Fruit
Forest
Other Rural

GROUP TOTAL:

fib-h
AB 0.1.2
Row Crops

Small Grains

Idle

Pasture

Forest

Other Rural
GROUP TOTAL:

59

AB 0.1.2
Row Crops
Small Grains
Sod Crops
Idle
Pasture
Forest
Other Rural

GROUP TOTAL:

AB 0.1.2
Sod Crops

13.538

5.715
7.675

2h.h01

1.212

14h.516

.1§.&2§
212, 1

389

5222

APPENDIX H (cont'd.)

Idle
Forest
GROUP TOTAL:

122a

AB 0.1.2
ow rops

Small Grains
Sod Crops
Idle
Pasture .
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:

C 0.1.2 -
Row Crops
Small Grains
Idle
Pasture
Other Rural
TOTAL:

C 3.h.§
Row Crops

D 0 1 2
Forest

GROUPATOTAL:

AB 0 1 2
Row Drops
Small Grains
Sod Crops
Idlel
Pasture
Fruit
Forest
Other Rural
GROUP TOTAL:

5 3a .

AB 0 1 2

Row Orops

Small Grains
Sod Crops
Idle
Pasture
Fruit
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:

Ag‘g8g‘grops

239

2.051

n.007
2.76u
3.118
1.998
1.072
I. .023
2.718

19.650

353

389
210
182

1.507

Idle
Forest
TOTAL:
2.2.1.2
Row 0r0ps
Small Grains
Sod Crops
Idle
Pasture
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:
C 3,#,5
Small Grains
Pasture
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:

D 0.1.2

Forest
D 3,#,5
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:
F 2,h.§
Forest
GROUP TOTAL:

5.28

AB 0.1.2
Pasture
Forest

GROUP TOTAL:

A 0.1.2
Row Crops

Small Grains
Sod Crops
Idle
Pasture
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:

B 0.1.2
Row Crops
Small Grains
Sod Crops
Pasture
Forest
TOTAL:

GROUP TOTAL:

1.068

3. 321
.969

686
997

APPENDIX H (cont'd.)

L-Zc

A 0.1.2
Row Crops
Small Grains
Sod Crops
Idle
Pasture
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:

B 0.1.2
Small Grains
Other Rural
TOTAL:

GROUP TOTAL:

L-ua :1.

A O~1 2
$08 Crops
Forest
GROUP TOTAL:

L-hc 7 '

A 0.1.2
,R0w~Crops
Forest

GROUP TOTAL:

 

-M0

”92%..
”21:36....

Small Grains

Sod Crops

Idle

Pasture

FOrest ,

Other Rural
GROUP TOTAL:

mg

Mc-a =~
A 0&1.2
ow Crops
Fruit
Forest

Other Rural
GROUP TOTAL:

 

2H0

13.530
5.420

6.628
3.6u0
9.532
39.958
16.871
95.379

195
21#

$0;

150

115133

20#

178%
652

11.u71
6.703
1.911.
6.951
2.822
13.633

1.1%

651
1.085
868

jtggg'

M11c
A 0.1.2

Row Crops

Idle

Forest
GROUP TOTAL:

M112

A 0.1.2
Row Crops
Small Grains
Sod Crops
Idle
Pasture
Forest
Other Rural
GROUP TOTAL:

Mike

A 0.1.2
Row Crops
Sod Crops
Idle
Pasture
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:

B 0.1.2
Row Crops
Sod Crops
TOTAL:

GROUP TOTAL:

M112

A 0.1.2
Row Crops
Pasture
Forest
GROUP TOTAL:

Q22
A O 1 2
Way-Crops
Idle»
GROUP TOTAL:

LRA TOTAL:

7.757
1.101
660
7.821
2.979
20.252
182
182

6a

2 6 6

 

APPENDIX I

Land Use By SMU In LRA 111

Misgellaneous
A__._4_.

Row Crops

Sod Crops

Forest
GROUP TOTAL:

1;,

2.2.1.2
Row Crops

2.2.1.2
Row Crops
Fruit
Other Rural
TOTAL:

D 3,#,5
Sod Crops

GROUP TOTAL:

12

A O 1 2
Row Crops
Small Grains
Sod Crops
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:

B 0.1.2
Row Crops
Small Grains
80d Crops
Fruit
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:

GROUP TOTAL:

0
A_2.1.2
Row-Crops
Small Grains
Sod Crops
Forest
Other Rural
GROUP TOTAL:

1.22
22.1.2
Row 0r0ps

395

#11

82
2.1

#11

206
617
#11
1.23#

11%

9.571
1.889
1. 966
1. 686

601

15.713

1. ##O
1.6#5
1. 028
#11
197
#11

2
20.

1#.117
5.1#2
2.879
2.871
1 028

267057

1.889
2#l

Sod Crops
Other Rural
TOTAL:

2.2.1.2

Row Crops
Small Grains
Sod Crops
Idle

Pasture
Fruit

Forest

Other Rural
TOTAL:

0 0.1.2

Row Crops
Small Grains
Sod Crops
Pasture
Fruit

Forest

Other Rural
TOTAL:

C 3.#.§

Row Crops
Small Grains
Sod Crops
Idle
Pasture
Forest
TOTAL:

D 0.1.2
Row 0r0ps
Small Grains
Pasture
Idle
Forest
TOTAL:

D83,#.§
Row Crops
Small Grains
Sod Crops
Pasture
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:

E 0.1.2
Pasture
Forest
TOTAL:

861
225
2.975

#2 .113
17. 52#
#. 826
1.573
2.##9
225
7.##8
2.833
78.991

17.168
3.554
3. 778
3, #80

206
11.020
1.023

33.299

2.02#
#11
225
899
197
#11

#,167

1.012
225
395

601
2,#30

1.209
#11
225
395
206

197
2.6#3

790
197
987

2.51

APPENDIX I (cont'd.)

£151.15
asgure
F O 1
Forest

F #
asture

GROUP TOTAL:

1.5b

A 051.2
ow Crops

Small Grains
Sod Crops
Pasture
Fruit

Forest

Other Rural
TOTAL:

BO 1 2
Row Crops
Small Grains
Sod Crops
Pasture
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:

GROUP TOTAL:

1.50

A 0.1.2
Row Crops
Small Grains
Sod~Crops
Idle
Pasture
Forest
Other»Rural
GROUP TOTAL:

A 0.1.2 1

Sod Crops
2.2.1.2
Row Crops
Small Grains
Sod Crops
Idle ’
Pasture
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:

C O 1 2
Row Crops

2#2

197
592

17671139

22 .658
5.391
.190
229
206
2.715
651

21.983
7.401.
1 .695

197
2.032
806

71.31%

1.59
.88
00
.29
.09
12

VHr‘NUtc
NNVUUHO

ii

225

9.729
2.11#
5. 2#2
1. 607
1.031
1.832
1.212
22.767

8.636

Small Grains
Sod 0r0ps
Idle
Pasture
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:
0 3,#,5
Row Crops
Sod Crops
Other Rural
TOTAL:
2.2.1.2
Row Crops
Small Grains
Forest
TOTAL:

941%111...

2.2.1.2
Sod Crops

Pasture
Forest
TOTAL:
E 3,#,5
Pasture
F 0.1.2
Pasture
F 3,#,5
Pasture
GROUP TOTAL:

2.5b

A 0.1.2
Row Crops

Small Grains
Sod Crops
Idle
Forest
TOTAL:
2.2.1.2
Row Crops
Small Grains
Idle
Pasture
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:
GROUP TOTAL:

2.5b-g

A 0E;,g
ow Crops

2.830
206
#30
395

#,O86

5.538
8#2

1.015
592
1.185
197

2.362
13. 55

655

APPENDIX I (cont'd.)

2.0.1.2
Row Crops
Other Rural
TOTAL:
GROUP TOTAL:

2.50
A O 1 2
Row Crops

Small Grains
Sed Crops
Pasture
Fruit

Forest

Other Rural
TOTAL:

."2

B 0&1.
ow Crops

Forest
TOTAL:
GROUP TOTAL:

2.5c-s

A O 1 2 ‘
Row.Cr0ps
Small Grains
Sod Crops
Forest
Other Rural

GROUP TOTAL:

A 051.2 «
.asture .

B 0.1.2
Row Crops
Idle
Pasture
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:.

C O;1.2
Row 0r0ps
Sod Crops
Idle
Pasture
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:

C 3,#,5
Row Crops

a

21.3

1.185

197
6,320
2.567
1.185

1.185

11.652

3.950
197
1.382
790
790
395
7.5011

987

Sod Crops
Pasture
Other Rural
TOTAL:

D O 1 2
Row Crops

- Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:

D }§#.§
ow Crops

Idle
Pasture
Forest
TOTAL:
22.1.2
Forest

£_JF%P§st

GROUP TOTAL:

32
A 0.1.2
Sod Crops
B 0.1.2
Row Crops
Forest
TOTAL:
GROUP TOTAL:

3g

A 0.1.2
Row Crops
Small Grains
Sod Craps
Idle
Fruit

GROUP TOTAL:

3.11.2

1.2.1.2
Row Crops
Small Grains
Sod Crops
Pasture
Forest
TOTAL:

B 0.1.2
Idle

GROUP TOTAL:

395
197
395
1.979

592
197
197
986

1 .382
197
395
395

2.369

197

at}?

197

395
197

790

APPENDIX I (cont'd.)

3122.

1.2.1.2
Row Crops
Small Grains
Sod Crops
Pasture
Other Rural
TOTAL:

2.0.1.2
ow Crops

Small Grains
Sod Crops
Idle
Pasture
Fruit
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:
2.2.1.2
Row Crops
Small~Grains
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:
D 0.1.2 .
Row Crops
GROUP TOTAL:

3(2b

A 0.1.2
Row Crops
Small Grains
Sod Crops
Forest
TOTAL:

B 0.1.2
Row‘Crops
Sod Crops
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:

GROUP TOTAL:

3Z§a

A 0.1.2
Row Crops
Sod Crops
Pasture
TOTAL:

B 0.1.2
Row Crops

Small Grains-

2##

206
1.028
#11
#11
206
2.262

2.808
3.996
1 .231.
592
197
1.11
1.637
1.0

10.778

790
1.253
197
206
2.296

15:32

1.6#5
206
#11

1.23#
3,#86

592
225
197
197
211

1
1L703

1.015
225
225

1,#65

6.212
1.272

Sod Crops
Idle
Pasture
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:

C 0.1.2
Row Craps
Idle
Pasture
TOTAL:

D O 1 2
SmaIl Grains

Sod Crops
Other Rural
TOTAL:

D 3,#,5
Row Crops
Idle
Other Rural
TOTAL:

E 0.1.2
Pasture

F 3,#,5
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:

GROUP TOTAL:

3(5b

A_0.1..2.
Row Crops
Sod Crops
Pasture
TOTAL:

B 0.1.2
Row Crops

GROUP TOTAL:

' 3152

1.2.1.2
Row Crops
Small Grains
Sod Crops
Pasture

GROUP TOTAL:

512
W
Row 0r0ps
Sod Crops
Pasture

...ELZ.
20.323

617
225
592
617
996

10.531

2.765
790
987

2.542

206
#11
206
823

197
592
197
986

987

395
592
8

197
197
197
591

889

2.506
1.067
#30

27%

a #85
1.711.
197

# 1b

E

APPENDIX I (cont'd.)

Fruit
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:
9.2.1.2
Row Crops
Sod Crops
Pasture
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:_
GROUP TOTAL:

AB 0.1.2
Row Crops
Small Grains
80d Crops
Forest
Other Rural
GROUP1TOTAL:

£2 ._
AB O-1 2
Row 0r0ps
Small Grains
GROUP TOTAL:

L

AA 0.1.2-
Row Craps

Ag 0.1.2
Row Crops
Small Grains
Idle
Pasture
Fruit
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:

2.2.1.2
Row Crops
Sod Crops
Idle
Forest
Other Rural
TOTAL:

E O 1 2
Forest

GROUP TOTAL:

245

206
817
206
7 .625

6#7
#50
197

395
206

9:93

1.15:.
206
1.028

1.382
#50
225
225
#50
620
198

3.550

987
#50
197
790
197
2.621

873-29?

AB 0.1.2
Row Crops
Forest
TOTAL:

22.1.2
orest
GROUP TOTAL:
5Q
AB 0 1 2
Row CrOps
Small Grains
Fruit
Forest

Other Rural
GROUP TOTAL:

5.2
A; 0.1.2
Row Crops

512a
Ag 0.1.2
orest
9 0.1.2

Idle
GROUP TOTAL:

5(2b
AB 0.1.2
Row Craps
Forest
GROUP TOTAL:

5.3a

AB 0.1.2
Row Crops
Small Grains
Sod 0r0ps
Pasture
Fruit
Other Rural
TOTAL:

22.1.2
ow Crops

Small Grains
Sod Crops

1.798
#11
206

1.851

206
197
1.028
206
#,722

197
#11
206

APPENDIX I (cont'd.)

Fruit
TOTAL:
C 3,#,5
Pasture
D 3,#,5
Pasture
GROUP TOTAL:

L-Za

A_Q§%:;Crops

Pasture
Forest
GROUP TOTAL:

L-Zbc

A O 1 2
Row Crops
Small Grains
Sod-Crops
Idle
PaSture
Forest
Other Rural
GROUP TOTAL:

11:11.2 .

A 0,1,2 1
Row Crops
Pasture

GROUP TOTAL:

 

Mg

A 0,1,2
Row Crops
Small.Grains
Sod Crops
Pasture
Forest
Other Rural

GROUPTOTAL:

Mlle
A 0,1,2 ‘
Sma l Grains

Forest
GROUP TOTAL:

2132
A 0,1,2
Row Crops

Sod Crops

Zué

Idle
Pasture
Forest
Other Rural
GROUP TOTAL:

Row Crops
Small Grains
Sod Crops
Other Rural
GROUP TOTAL:

LRA TOTAL :

 

APPENDIX J

SMG's, Their Included Series, Acreage and Percent of Michigan.
SMG Included Series Acreage Percent

Misc. 89,367 0.29
Ga Ontonagon 150,846 0.49
Ob Roselms

Rudyard 165,338 0.53
0c Bergland

Paulding 49,288 0.16
1a Kent

St. Clair

Superior 142,609 0.46
lb Fulton

Nappanee

Selkirk 281,854 0.91
lo Hoytville

Latty

Pickford

Toledo 230,770 0.74
1.5a Barker

Morley

Nester

Nunica

Watton 1,156,845 3.73
1.5b Blount

Bowers

Delrey

Kawkawlin

Twining 634,907 2.05
1.5c Hettinger

Hettinger, mesic var.

Jeddo

Lenawee

Pewamo

Sims

Sims, mesic var. 663,384 2.14
2.5a Celina

Dighton

Guelph

Isabella

Marlette

Miami

Ockley

Onaway 1,639,718 5.29
2.5a-af Elo

Wakefield 42,331 0.14
2.5a-s Bohemian

SiSson

Tuscola 117,513 0.38

247

248

APPENDIX J (cont' d.)

2.5b

2.5c-

2.5c-cs

3a

3a-f

3a-af

3a-m
3a-s

3b

S

Capac, fri. var.

Capac

Conover

Londo

Mackinac

Elo, less wet var.

Brimley

Brimley, mod. fine sbt var.
Kibbie

Kibbie, mod. fine sbt var. 218
Sanilac 5
Angelica .

Angelica, mesic var.

Brookston

Parkhill 871
Tappan

Thomas

Thomas, mesic var.

Wisner

Wisner, fri. var. 80
Bruce

Colwood 129
Each 1
Bronson, sl

Dryden

Elmdale

Emmet

Hillsdale

Lapeer

Omena

Oshtemo, sl

Trenary 1,3
McBride 2
Champion

Iron River

Gogebic

Munising 1,303
Oshtemo, mollic var. g
Alcona

Brady, sl

Coral

Locke

Teasdale

Traverse

Tula 319
Skanee 79
Richter 19
Barry

Ensley

Ensley, mesic var.

Gay

Gay, mesic var.

1.199

7L.
67

.333
217

,004
,252

,460

.724

,021
,036

.961
.152

,616
.893
.370

.730
.563
.577

2.81

0.26

0.42
tr.

mm

CL?
a»:

4.20
0.02
0.01

OOH
ONO
O\O\U

249

APPENDIX J (cont'd.)

3/2b

3/20

3/5a

3/5a-a
3/5a-m

3/5b
32:

3/Rbc

4a

Lacota

Lacota, mesic var.
Witbeck

Tonkey

Tonkey, mesic var.
Dryberg

Dafter

Munuscong

Wauseon

Cadmus
Kendallville
Owosso

Ubly

Ubly, mesic var.
Belding

Belding, mesic var.
Macomb

Metamora

Berville
Breckenridge
Corunna

Coventry

Dowagiac

Dresden

Fox

Ionia

Kalamazoo

Newaygo

Sunfield

Amasa

Stambaugh

Volinia

Warsaw

Matherton

Palo

Sebewa

Longrie
Michigamme-Rockland co.
Onota

Parma

Parma, wet var.
Sundell

Nahma

Blue Lake

Blue Lake, mesic var.
Boyer

Bronson, ls

Casco

Gilchrist

Karlin

Karlin, mesic var.
Kiva

124.376

29,602

3.982
6,904

154,322

193.638

206,112

72,268

1,329,801

74,872
52.863

114,876
127,704

270,442

8,634

0.40
0.10
0.01
0.02

0.50

4.29
0.24
0.17

0-37
0.41

250

APPENDIX J (cont'd.)

4a-a

4b

4c

4/1a
4/1b

4/1c
4/2a

4/2b

4/2bs

4/2c

4/2c-c

Leelanau

Mancelona

Mancelona, mesic var.
Montcalm

Oshtemo, ls

Perrin

Rousseau

Rousseau, mesic var.
Spinks

Keweenaw

Pence

Brady, ls

Fabius

Gladwin

Otisco

Thetford

Wainola

Wasepi

Deford

Deford, mesic var.
Edmore

Edmore, fri. var.
Epoufette

Epoufette, mesic var.
Gilford

Saganing

Spinks, ls, wet var.
Manistee

Manistee, mesic var.
Seward

Allendale

Arkona

Rimer

Pinconning

Sicles

Ocqueoc

Mancelona, l sbt
Mancelona, l sbt, mesic var.
Menominee

Metea

Gladwin, l sbt
Iosco

Wixom

Thetford, l sbt
Ingalls

Rapson

Brevort

Brevort, mesic var.
Burleigh

Burleigh, mesic var.
Metea, wet var.
Essexville

2.530.552
272.707

256.139

310.355
40.913

183,132
29.770

226,193

355.852
~21.993

158,416
8,265

8.16
0.88

1.00

0.13

0-59
0.10

251

APPENDIX J (cont'd.)

4/Ra
5a

5a-h
5a-m

S-Ba

5.7a

5b

5b-h

Duel

Chelsea

Coloma

Croswell

Covert

East Lake

Graycalm

Kalkaska

Kalkaska, red sbt
Kalkaska, mesic var.
Wallace

Sparta

Sparta, fri. var.
Deer Park

Eastport

East ort, mesic var.
0akv1lle, fs
Oakville, mwd
Plainfield
Plainfield, fri. var.
Rubicon

Rubicon, mesic var.
Shelldrake

Vilas

Grayling

Grayling, boric var.
Omega

Au Gres

Brems

Morocco

Morocco, fri. var.
Pipestone

Tedrow

Tedrow, fri. var.
Channing

Channing, mesic var.
Finch

Ogemaw

Ogemaw, mesic var.
Saugatuck

Granby

Kingsville
Roscommon

Vestaburg

Tobico

Kinross

Kinross, mesic var.
Roscommon, acid var.
Melita;;

Oakville, l sbt
Rubicon, l sbt, mesic var.
Rubicon, l sbt var.

2,187

2.792.690
133.067

8,809

2,447,270

690,469

654,518

170,258
778.474
12,129

198,415

169.435

7.89

2.23

2.11

252

APPENDIX J (cont'd.)

5/2b

L-2a

L-20

L-4a
L-4c

L-Mc
Mc

Mc-a

M/1c
M/3c

M/4c
M/mc

Arenac

Au Gres

Morocco

Eel

Eel, fri. var.
Genesee

Genesee, fri. var.
Landes

Landes, fri. var.
Ceresco

Ceresco, fri. var.
Cohoctah

Cohoctah, fri. var.
Saranac

Shoals

Shoals, fri. var.
Sloan

Sloan, fri. var.
Wallkill

Wallkill, fri. var.
Washtenaw
Washtenaw, fri. var.
Abscota

Abscota, fri. var.
Algansee

Glendora

Glendora, fri. var.
Winterfield
Kerston

Kerston, fri. var.
Carbondale

Carlisle

Houghton

Houghton, fri. var.
Lupton

Rifle

Rifle, mesic var.
Dawson

Dawson, mesic var.

Greenwood

Greenwood, mesic var.
Spalding

Spalding, mesic var.
Tahquamenon

Willette

Willette, fri. var.
Cathro

Linwood

Palms

Adrian

Markey

Edwards

164,189

44,911

496.935
26,272

87.582
107,083

2.031.971

363,082
34,964

229,001
474,851

0.14

1.60
0.08

0.28
0-35

6.55

1.17
0.11

0.74
1-53

253

APPENDIX J (cont'd.)

Ga

Gbc

G/Ra
Ra

Rbc
TOTAL:

Edwards, fri. var.
Warners

Warners, fri. var.
Allouez

Alpena

Johnswood

Rodman

Waiska

Detour

Diana

Hessel

Hessel, mesic var.
Allouez, bedrock sbt
St. Ignace
Summerville
Michigamme-Rockland Co.
Burt

Ruse

tr. = trace - less than 0.01

55.474

153.294

62.408
35.165

188,668

66,481

31.013.053

0.18