MSU RETURNING MATERlflg: PIace in book drop to LIBRARIES remove this checkout from -—:3--_ your record. FINES will be charged if book is returned after the date stamped below. 4%%24&Q;; Ii! r'.' ;,.’ '1‘ 0 U732 (I " MW" \0 WM. . - ' ‘ it p" E .77 . ” ‘A‘ 121-". "f 1' L35" 5. t. .. 1-in-1: k i“ “at! INFLUENCES OF MATERNAL AGE AND WORK STATUS ON ADJUSTMENT TO PARENTHOOD By Esther Dienstag A DISSERTATION Submitted to Michigan State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Department of Psychology 1986 ABSTRACT INFLUENCES 0F MATERNAL AGE AND WORK STATUS 0N ADJUSTMENT T0 PARENTHOOD By Esther Dienstag This study examined the relationship between women's ages and work status and adjustment to motherhood at the transition to parenthood. One hundred and twenty five middle class primiparous mothers completed questionnaires about their experiences with and attitudes toward parenting. All of the women had been employed prior to the birth of the child but only 402 were employed at the time of the study. Scales were computed with confirmatory factor analysis and scale alpha reliability coefficients ranged from .61 to .90 (mean=.75). Variables used to predict adjustment to parenthood were maternal education, active coping including social support, infant health and regularity, and responsiveness of maternal attitudes toward the infant. Adjustment to parenthood was defined as satisfaction with parenthood and enjoyment of early infancy. Conflict between mothering and work roles was defined as perceived loss of valued role activities. Path analyses were performed on working and nonworking mother subsamples and different relationships emerged for the two groups. For working mothers, high role conflict was associated with greater responsive attitudes toward the infant and less advanced education. High role conflict in nonworking mothers was associated with less responsive attitudes and more advanced education. Both maternal role conflict and infant illness or irregularity had greater impact on nonworking than on working mothers. The strongest predictor of adjustment in the working subsample was availability of social support. Role competition and role enhancement in working and nonworking mothers are discussed. THIS DISSERTATION IS DEDICATED TO THE MEMORY OF EDITH DIENSTAG ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank my committee members, Dr. Elaine Donelson, Dr. Hiram Fitzgerald, Dr. John McKinney, and Dr. Ellen Strommen. I would particularly like to thank my chairperson, Hi Fitzgerald, for his guidance and patience and for his contributions to my professional development. He is a role model with integrity and humor who taught me to uphold standards of excellence. Dr. John Hunter's assistance in the statistical analysis was invaluable and helped shape my thinking. Others whose technical expertise and assistance helped the research process were Dr. John Condon and Dr. Steven Gitterman. Thank you to all the mothers who generously agreed to participate and to all those at the parents organizations who helped put me in touch with these mothers. Dr. Evan Charney and Dr. Barbara Howard not only provided me with secretarial and technical support, they also gave me encouragement and the opportunity to complete my research. My appreciation is extended to Susan Proper and Laraine Fisher who assisted in preparation of the manuscript. To my father, Simon Dienstag, I know you share with me my regret that Frieda Dienstag did not enjoy the culmination of this effort. I 5““ grateful to my family: Simon Dienstag, Leah Mallon, Abbe and Debbie iii ‘Dienstag, Ely Dienstag, and Rae Ann Dienstag. My niece and nephews, David, Diana, Aryeh,and Chaim, have invited me intimately into the world of childhood. My friends have been my second family. I learned from them about giving and caring. Cathleen McGreal: through all the growth and transformations, our friendship has been a constant in my graduate career. I never cease to discover in you and Kerry traits to cherish, admire and emulate. Thank you both for your friendship and your collegiality. I would like to thank Sandy Rosenblatt for providing tea and nurturance when she knew it was needed and also to express appreciation to her family. And to all the other friends who have been a part of my life, thank you. iv LIST OF TABLES LIST OF FIGURES INTRODUCTION LITERATURE REVIEW METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION LIST OF REFERENCES APPENDIX A TABLES APPENDIX B QUESTIONNAIRE UCHRIS PERMISSION FORM PARENT RECRUITMENT LETTER INFORMED CONSENT STATEMENT SUBJECT FEEDBACK FORM TABLE OF CONTENTS ma vi ix 47 55 90 118 128 170 187 188 191 192 Table Table Table Table Table Table Table Table Table Table Table Table Table Table Table Table LIST OF TABLES 1: CHARACTERISTICS OF FAMILIES PARTICIPATING IN THIS STUDY 2: CHARACTERISTICS OF INFANTS 3: FACTOR INTERCORRELATIONS AND LOADING MATRIX 4: ITEM CORRELATION MATRIX COMPUTED WITH ONES ON THE DIAGONAL AND WITH CLUSTER SCORES PARTIALED OUT 5: FINAL SCALES DERIVED FROM THE A PRIORI CLUSTER ANALYSIS 6: TOTAL SAMPLE STANDARD SCORE COEFFICIENT ALPHAS 6A: TOTAL SAMPLE CORRECTED INTERSCALE CORRELATIONS 7: PATH ANALYSIS: FULL SAMPLE ORDINARY LEAST SQUARES SOLUTION 8: STANDARD SCORE COEFFICIENT ALPHAS FOR THE WORKING SUBSAMPLE 8A: CORRECTED INTERSCALE CORRELATIONS: WORKING SUBSAMPLE 9: PATH ANALYSIS, ORDINARY LEAST SQUARES SOLUTION WORKING SUBSAMPLE 10: STANDARD SCORE COEFFICIENT ALPHAS, NONWORKING SUBSAMPLE 10A: CORRECTED INTERSCALE CORRELATIONS, NON-WORKING SUBSAMPLE 11: PATH ANALYSIS, ORDINARY LEAST SQUARES SOLUTION NON-WORKING SUBSAMPLE 12: PATH COEFFICIENTS, ORDINARY LEAST SQUARES SOLUTION NON-WORKING SUBSAMPLE 13: PATH ANALYSIS, ORDINARY LEAST SQUARES SOLUTION WORKING SUBSAMPLE Vi PAGE 128 130 131 133 136 140 140 141 142 142 143 144 144 145 146 147 Table Table Table Table Table Table Table Table Table Table Table Table Table Table Table Table Table Table Table Table 14: Mean Responsiveness to Infant for 3 Levels of Maternal Age 15: Mean Active Coping and Maternal Age 16; Available Coping Facilities and Mean Dissatisfaction with Parenthood 17: Work Status, Role Conflict and Dissatisfaction With Maternal Role 17A: Mean Age and Mean Role Conflict Scores 18: Mean Scale Scores for Infant Sex 18A: Mean Scale Scores for Infant Illness/Irregularity 19: Mean Scale Scores for Planned vs. Unplanned Pregnancies 19A: Mean Scale Scores for Duration of Marriage 20: Mean Responsiveness to Infant for Infant Age and Maternal Work Status 21: Mean Responsiveness to Infant for Maternal Work Status 22: Mean Scale Scores for Method of Feeding Infant 23: Mean Scale Scores for Maternal Work Status and Method of Feeding Infant 24: Mean Responsiveness to Infant for Maternal Work Status, Method of Feeding Infant and Maternal Age 25: Mean Dissatisfaction with Parenthood for Two Levels of Maternal Age at Two Levels of Work Status for Breast and Bottle Feeding Mothers 26: Mean Responsiveness to Infant for Maternal Education 27: Mean Scale Scores for Postponement of Childbearing 28: Mean Scale Scores for Percentage of Time Worked 29: Means and Standard Deviations for Background Variables and Maternal Age 30: Mean Traditional Feminine Role Identification Scores for Different Levels of Maternal Age in Bottle Feeding Mothers vii PAGE 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 PAGE Table 31: Mean Dissatisfaction with Parenthood for Two Levels of Maternal Age at Two Levels of Work Status and Two Levels of Responsiveness to Infant 168 Table 32: Mean Dissatisfaction with Parenthood for Two Levels of Maternal Work Status and Two Levels of Traditional Role Identification 169 viii Figure Figure Figure Figure Figure Path model for Path model for Path model for Path model for path model for LIST OF FIGURES total sample. working mother sample. nonworking sample. nonworking mothers. working mothers. ix £591; 62 66 71 74 75 INTRODUCTION The last few decades has seen a huge growth in knowledge about the early stages of the life cycle. Examination of the infant in relationship to the caretaking environment is the subject of intensive study, but analysis of the determinants of the quality of this relationship from the mother's perspective has only recently gained attention. The early literature on motherhood tended to be written from a psychoanalytic perspective (Benedek, 1959; Bibring, 1961). Later, a host of books appeared relating to the experience of mothering from a feminist perspective. These books speculated about the nature of motherhood in the age of women's liberation and its place in a rapidly changing society (eg. Lazarre, 1977; Chodorow, 1978; Peck and Snederowitz, 1974). Finally, the last decade has seen the advent of scientific examination of the process of becoming a parent including precursors of competent parenting and consequences to the parent of preconceptual, prenatal and perinatal occurences. Early empirical studies of the transition to motherhood mostly focused on questions about the negative aspects of parenting such as the extent of crisis experienced at the point of transition (LeMasters. 1953: Dyer, 1963: Hobbs, 1968, 1976), postpartum depression (Gordon, K313081113, and Gordon, 1965: Yalom, Lunde, Moos, and Hamburg, 1968), and the negative impact of parenthood on the marital relationship (e.g. 1 Feldman, 1971, 1974). The instruments used for the most part have been designed to measure crisis and have been less sensitive to the more positive aspects of motherhood. Recent investigations have attempted to explore the nature of the stressors associated with parenting and factors affecting the outcome of this important transition such as prebirth personality characteristics (Leifer, 1977; Heinicke, Diskin, Ramsey-Klee, and Given, 1983), the role of social support (Wandersman, 1978, 1980: Crnic, Greenberg, Ragozin, Robinson, and Basham, 1983), sex role stereotypes and child care preferences (Entwisle and Doering, 1981; McHale and Huston, 1983), motivations for parenthood and adaptation to pregnancy (Leifer, 1977) and female work status (Hoffman, 1978). The purpose of the current study is to determine the relationship between mother's age and work status on her adjustment to motherhood and satisfaction with the role as well as to examine the specific coping skills that women of various ages use to adapt to the stresses of the transition to parenthood. Research on the adult life cycle suggests that there are unique developmental tasks which are typically completed in the early part of the adult life course (Erikson, 1959). Although much of this research has been conducted with males (Vaillant, 1977 Levinson, Darrow, Klein, I Levinson, and McKee, 1978), there has been limited replication with female samples (e.g. Bardwick, 1980; Gilligan, 1979). It is believed that the adaptation to motherhood and successful coping with stresses of parenthood will be influenced by accomplishment of these developmental tasks which is roughly reflected in the age of the mother. The first section of the introduction includes a discussion of the literature on transition to parenthood including studies that focus on the crisis of transition and studies that view the transition as a normal developmental phase requiring restructuring of roles and relationships and world view assumptions. As the first section addresses issues regarding adjustment to parenthood typical of all new mothers, the latter sections concentrate on the variables which may discriminate women in the early phases of young adulthood (ages 20-29) from later stages of early adulthood (30-40). This includes a discussion of the adult life course and the normative developmental crises and tasks by which it is defined. The section that follows reviews the various roles which women assume including and in relation to the role of mothering. It is believed that role orientations may differ between older and younger mothers and that they may influence adaptation to mothering (cf. Rindfuss and Bumpass, 1978; Hoffman, 1978: Wilkie, 1981: Daniels and Weingarten, 1982). There have been few studies which have directly addressed the question of adult maternal age and its effects on mothers or their infants. These are reviewed and followed by a brief summary and statement of the purposes and hypotheses of the current study. LITERATURE REVIEW Transition to Parenthood Transitions have been defined as relatively short periods of disequilibrium in which old patterns and old assumptions are deemed inadequate and new ones must be adapted on short notice. ’It is a time that provides an opportunity for either psychological growth or deterioration (Parkes, 1971; Moos and Tsu, 1976). The point of actual transition may be characterized by denying defenses while the demands of the novel situation are met. The negative aspects of the change are partially denied, allowing the individual time to mobilize coping resources necessary for adaptation. As these demands become less pressing and more familiar, more active coping strategies can be employed. Gradually the individual adapts and a new homeostasis is achieved over time (White, 1976). (During transition to parenthood the parent must make major changes in lifestyle and in relationships. While pregnancy may be viewed as a preparatory period, the actual process of becoming a parent is sudden, and requires immediate adaptation while the needs of the infant are being met.;]The new parent must incorporate the task of protecting and nurturing the young and must assimilate the new role of parent vis a vis the world and the self. Others will view the new parent with a new set of assumptions and the parent will gradually gain a novel view of him or herself as a result of the parenting process. Bibring (1961) observed 15 primigravidas during the course of their pregnancies and observed their psychological growth. On the basis of her findings, she described pregnancy as a normal crisis which leads to 4 specific maturational gains, the outcome of which will have profound effects on the early mother-infant interaction. She found maturation to be gradual in those subjects in which it occurred. Evidence is reviewed below which defines the transition to parenthood in terms of a psychosocial transition yielding maturational gain. Consideration of this topic will begin with a view of parenthood as crisis as well as an examination of the potential maturational gains of parenthood. Clearly the beginning of parenthood is marked by major reorganization of belief systems, roles and lifestyles including changes in time commitments and schedules, household arrangements, relationships with spouses, parents, and friends. Work roles may change and the new role of mother must be assumed. Rossi (1968) points out that unlike other transitions in early adulthood such as shifts in marital status and occupational status, parenthood is an abrupt change for which there is little preparation in our society. Whereas marriage in the United States is usually preceded by courtship and engagement, there is nothing similar to parenthood in our culture which prepares women for the experience of total responsibility for a child. The tasks of pregnancy are discontinuous with those of motherhood and the prevalence of small, nuclear families in this country precludes routine experience with child care prior to parenthood. Moreover, it is largely an irrevocable process. Rossi also points out that the difficulty of parenting is compounded by the lack of guidelines to successful parenting in our society. Even though there are many child care resource books in our society, the conflicting advice leads to confusion rather than resolution. tBased on their observations, some researchers have considered early parenthood to be a normal developmental transitional period. Others have looked on this period as a crisis which functions to facilitate the necessary role changes. Parenthood as Crisis / LeMasters (1963) interviewed 46 couples whose eldest child was 5 years of age or less and evaluated them on the extent of crisis experienced immediately following their first birth. Scores ranged from no crisis to severe crisis. LeMasters found that 832 of the couples in his sample experienced extensive to severe crisis despite the fact that most of these couples had planned the pregnancy. There was no relationship between marital stability and experience of crisis. Most couples indeed reported that they had very little effective preparation for the parental role. Mothers attributed the crisis to problems such as loss of sleep, chronic fatigue, social isolation, added household chores, guilt at ineffective mothering, appearance changes and loss of outside employment. Fathers also were dissatisfied with decline of sexual responsiveness in wives and increased financial hardships. These findings were replicated by Dyer (1963) who reported that 53% of his sample experienced extensive to severe crisis after the birth of their first child. In contrast to LeMasters' and Dyer's findings, Hobbs (1965) found that parenthood was not very stressful for his sample. Unlike LeMasters and Dyer, he did not interview his subjects but rather used a 23 item objectively scored checklist based on the problems presented by LeMasters' sample. This was administered to parents between 3 and 18 weeks after the birth of the first child. Subjects indicated the degree to which they were bothered by each item. None of the couples in this sample scored in the severe or extensive crisis categories. Differences in methodological designs may have contributed to the discrepant results. LeMasters' and Dyer's samples consisted of 46 and 32 middle class couples respectively who were describing their experiences retrospectively up to 5 years after the birth. Hobbs on the other hand obtained a probability sample from the public birth records including 53 lower to upper middle class couples and tested the subjects shortly after the time of transition. Middle class samples have been shown to differ on variables which relate to ease of transition such as wife's career aspirations, identity derived by wives from extrafamilial activities, and previous experience with child care (Jacoby, 1969). Middle class mothers who were foresaking career identities for motherhood may have experienced the transition to parenthood as more stressful than lower income women. The time frame may also partially explain the discrepancy. Mothers who are two to five years past the time of childbirth may be more willing to acknowledge negative feelings about the child (Hobbs, 1965) or they may have distorted perceptions of the event (See Yarrow, Campbell and Burton, 1970). Alternatively, Hobbs may have contacted his subjects too early after the birth. Hobbs' subjects were on the average of 9 weeks postpartum. This may have found them still ensconced in what has been termed the "baby honeymoon" phase usually found to occur up to 6-8-weeks following birth (Hobbs, 1965). This is the period in which mothers form attachments to the new babies and are buffered from possible negative reactions to the exigencies of early mothering, perhaps by the denial mechanism considered to shield those in the throes of transition. For instance, Miller and Sollie (1980) found that new mothers in their sample had higher personal stress scores at 8 months postpartum than they did prenatally but that their stress scores were not elevated above prenatal levels at one month postpartum. Thus Hobbs' sample may not have been far enough into the child's first year to be experiencing the full extent of the crisis. An equally likely cause of the discrepancy is in the instruments used. The Hobbs checklist asks questions about the extent to which the new parent is bothered by the life changes whereas LeMasters and Dyer drew their conclusions based on the presence or absence of life changes reported during subject interviews. People have different levels of dissatisfaction to behavioral disruptions. Studies which address dissatisfaction along with gratification report lesser estimates of crisis (Russell, 1974). Although different research procedures were used in the various studies, it is doubtful that the closed response structure of the Hobbs research tool itself was a major cause of the discrepant findings. In a replication study by Hobbs (1968) 27 couples were administered the Hobbs checklist and submitted to a relatively unstructured interview as well. The two instruments yielded similar results with moderate but significant correlations between them and both replicated findings from the original study. In summary, whereas all agree that early parenthood is a broad-ranging stressful transition, the extent to which it is seen as a crisis period varies. Studies based on retrospective accounts of middle class subjects which focus on specific behavior change associated with the transition tend to present the transition as a major crisis. Alternatively, studies based on more representative samples which include gratifications of parenting along with difficulties and which ask the subject to assess the degree of perturbance with behavior change tend to portray the transitional period as only characterized by slight to moderate crisis. nggitudinal studies of the transition to parenthood All studies of transition to parenthood reviewed have found greater or lesser amounts of stress associated with this transitional phase (Shereshevsky and Yarrow, 1974; Eichler, Winickoff, Grossman, Anzolone, Gofseyeff and 1977; Entwisle and Doering, 1980). Several have attempted to examine specific variables that facilitate or impede the process of transition and to do this have followed a sample of women from some time before the birth of the first child to some point after the birth to identify predictors of successful parenting. Studies which have followed this course have achieved varying levels of success in predicting adaptation. In one year-long longitudinal study, women were followed from the first trimester of pregnancy through 6 months postpartum. Intensive interviews and psychometric testing were conducted to assess the predictive powers of prenatal variables (Shereshevsky and Yarrow, 1974). Results based on data from 60 primiparas indicated that women with high amounts of interest in and experience with children prenatally, and with successful adaptation to pregnancy adapted better to the mothering role. Successful adaptation to motherhood was defined by predominant mood, sense of adequacy in coping with infant needs and level of satisfying relationship with spouse. Adaptation to pregnancy, which predicted adaptation to mothering, included predominant positive prenatal mood, positive attitude towards pregnancy with low anxiety levels and high flexibility. These results seem to indicte that those women who have adequate coping strategies during pregnancy, such as 10 maintaining a good frame of mind and being flexible, also cope well with the stresses of early parenting. Postnatal factors that predicted good adjustment were marital adjustment, nurturnace level and ego strength. Leifer (1977) followed 19 women from pregnancy through the postpartum period. She found that several prenatal variables were important predictors of good adjustment to motherhood. These included growth motivation for motherhood versus security or negative motivations, prenatal confidence in maternal abilities, stability of first trimester personality integration, anxiety focused on the fetus rather than the self, and satisfaction with body image during pregnancy. These conclusions, however, are based on qualitative data analysis from a small sample of mothers. After the total sample of 19 subjects was divided into high, moderate and low adjustment groups, conclusions were based on subgroups of 6-7 subjects each. Therefore, it is difficult to judge the extent to which the data fit the model presented. Still, Leifer's findings are provocative and suggest that adaptation to motherhood may be associated with a constellation of prenatal and probably pre-conceptional personality and attitudinal variables. The same factors which lead to adaptive coping with pregnancy also predict to mature ego functioning after the birth of the baby. Heinicke and colleagues (1983) found prebirth maternal ‘personality variables such as adaptive coping, capacity to form relationships, and active style of emotional expression more powerful in predicting successful mothering than either the mother's adaptation to the pregnancy or her socio-economic status. They found that mothers 11 who were able to meet their own needs, and who were able to form good peer relations and who had low anxiety levels, were more responsive to their infants and provided their infants with more cognitive stimulation (Heinicke, Diskin, Ramsey-Klee and Given, 1983). Prebirth maternal anxiety was found to be associated with poorer postpartum maternal adjustment and infant adjustment in yet another prospective study (Grossman, Eichler and Winickoff, 1980). In this sample, both prebirth anxiety and depression were predictive of poorer mothering. High motivation for motherhood has consistently been associated with indices of successful parenting (Grossman et a1, 1980; Crawford, 1983) as has previous experience with children, acceptance of the nurturant role or ability to envision oneself as a mother (Moss, 1967; Heinicke et a1, 1983: Crawford, 1983). Crawford (1983) did not find prenatal variables to predict maternal adaptation to parenting, which is a measure of the mother's adjustment to her new role and responsibilities. Rather she found that they predicted greater "attachment“ to infants and greater acceptance of infants, which are indicators of the mother's feelings toward the baby. The timing of the last parental contact may account for the discrepancy between these and other findings. Postnatal interviews with both parents took place when infants were six weeks old. Thus the early phase of adjusting to the physical and emotional demands of the transition may have obscured the relationship between intrinsic coping abilities as measured during pregnancy and the use of those coping skills postpartum. Indeed, the author did find evidence for a "baby honeymoon". Attachment to the baby was less salient for these couples in the first 6 weeks after birth than their own ability to successfully 12 cope with the demands of parenting. Parents who had difficulties in attachment did not adjust more poorly than others, but parents who had difficulty in adjustment experienced negative changes in their attitudes of attachment and acceptance of the baby. Thus it seems that stresses of early parenthood are so overwhelming for primiparas that changes in attitudes towards the baby are held in abeyance unless the parents experience a failure to cope. Multiparas are less insulated from external pressures and are more vulnerable to outside stresses than are first time mothers (Grossman et al, 1980). The studies by both Shereshevsky and Yarrow and by Leifer examined parents at 6-7 months postpartum. Both of these studies found prenatal variables predictive of postnatal adjustment. On the other hand, Crawford found that prenatal variables did not predict adjustment at 6 weeks postpartum. Indeed in a 6-8 week interview of Leifer's subjects, prenatal variables were not associated with confidence in the maternal role for those subjects who showed moderate to high levels of confidence. By the 7 month contact the relationship between prenatal and postnatal adjustment emerged. Those women who had been highly confident about their mothering abilities prenatally perceived motherhood as a positive experience at 7 months postpartum. As in any sudden transition, high levels of stress obscure the relationship between good coping and adaptation. By the second half of the first postpartum year, coping strategies have been implemented with varying degrees of success and evidence of the continuity between prenatal and postnatal adjustment patterns emerges. 13 Crawford did find a constellation of perinatal and postnatal events which predicted successful adaptation in the first 6 weeks postpartum. Positive perinatal attitude towards the baby, uneventful labor and delivery, rooming-in with the baby at the hospital and opportunity to hold the infant shortly after delivery as well as infant variables of health and temperament were all predictive of mothers perceiving their infants as less demanding at 6 weeks postpartum. In short, maternal and infant health postnatally, positive maternal attitudes towards the baby, and early contact perinatally predicted adjustment to parenthood during early infancy. Summing across studies, prenatal variables that have been found to be predictive of successful adaptation to motherhood are maternal adjustment to pregnancy, flexibility during pregnancy, positive mood, low incidence of depression and low anxiety or anxiety focused on the fetus rather than the self (Shereshefsky and Yarrow, 1974; Leifer, 1977; Grossman, Eichler and Winickoff, 1980; Heinicke, Diskin, Ramsey-Klee and Given, 1983). Predictive prenatal maternal attitudes are motivation for parenthood, confidence in maternal abilities, acceptance of the nurturant role, and experience with and high amounts of interest in or positive view of children (Moss, 1967: Shereshevsky and Yarrow, 1974: Leifer, 1977; Crawford, 1983). Personality integration, including the ability to relate to others empathically, and ego integrity and flexibility have also been found to lead to successful adaptation to motherhood (Shereshevsky and Yarrow, 1974; Leifer, 1977, Heinicke, et al. 1983; Crawford, 1983). 14 Perinatal and postnatal predictive factors are parental marital adjustment (Shereshefsky and Yarrow, 1974: Grossman et al, 1980), positive perinatal attitudes towards baby, uneventful labor and delivery, early and extended perinatal contact with baby (Crawford, 1983) and infant health and temperament (Gibaud-Wallston and Wandersman, 1978: Crawford, 1983). One can conclude from the preceding section that although transition to motherhood is characterized by upheaval and stress, certain maternal personality characteristics, infant characteristics, life events and coping strategies can predispose the mother to successful adaptation to her new role. Following the initial period in which most negative affect is suppressed, gradual shifts occur of both positive and negative valence. Like other developmental transitions, the transition to parenthood requires personality reorganization and major accomodation and often results in psychological growth. Evidence exists for the emergence of personal growth as a result of the transition. Leifer found that 2/3 of her sample felt increases in self-esteem, growth and expansion of self by 7 months postpartum and Shereshefsky and Yarrow found clinical evidence, as assessed by interview and psychological testing, for personal growth in 1/3 of their sample. Elsewhere, mothers have reported significant increases in feelings of self-confidence, competence, and energy and decreases in anxiety (Wandersman, 1978) and in selfishness, egocentricity and volatileness (Feldman, 1971) over the course of the first year. 15 Among the coping patterns that have been cited as effective in easing the transition to parenthood are general positive mood, ego integrity and marital adjustment. But examinations of the early parenting period reveal losses in such areas as marital satisfaction and mental health for women with infants and preschool children. Because of the importance of these two facilitators to effective adaptation, their vulnerablity during the transitional stage will be described below. Marital Satisfaction There is a growing body of evidence pointing to a change in the marital relationship after the birth of the first child. Some researchers have found a decline in marital happiness following the birth of the first child (Feldman, 1971, 1974; Wandersman, 1978: Belsky, Spanier and Rovine, 1983) and a strain on the couple relationship (Cowan, Cowan, Coie and Coie, 1978) while others have not found evidence for negative marital impact or have found evidence for positive impact (Hobbs, 1965: Russel, 1974: Miller and Sollie, 1980). Still others have found mixed results finding no change in general level of marital satisfaction but finding specific differences between women with young preschoolers and those without. Examples of such specific differences include amount of "lovesickness" or the feeling by wives that they are not getting enough attention from their husbands (Ryder, 1973), feeling there are some problems in the marriage or that there is less time for couple activities such as chatting with spouses, or being physically affectionate with spouses (Mikus, 1980). As in the transitional crisis literature, attention must be paid to the format of ‘the question asked. Crnic and colleagues (Crnic, Greenberg, Ragozin et 16 a1, 1983) found that amount of support a woman received from her husband did not affect her satisfaction with parenting. Her satisfaction with her husband's support was predictive of satisfaction with parenthood. Again presence or absence of an event or relationship is less meaningful than the subject's perception thereof. Grossman et al (1980) found mixed results in outcome of the marital relationship following the transition to parenthood. Satisfaction with the marriage decreased with the birth of the first child as mothers felt temporarily disenchanted. However, mothers in the sample also reported enrichment of the marital relationship as a result of the new baby. While birth of the first child is consistently reported to have both positive and negative effects on the marriage, it may be related to the heightened intensity of emotions during this period and the increased salience of the marital relationship. Children are commonly seen as a source of common joy and of shared work which enables parents to regroup around a common goal and mutual concerns. 0n the other hand, having children usually results in less time for couple activities and can be a source of disagreement when there is a lack of consensus in childrearing (Hoffman and Manis, 1978). Belsky speculates that the marital relationship may be the main social support for parents thus increasing its salience (Belsky, 1984). Mothers of young children tend to experience decreases in friendship support, perhaps due to their limited mobility and flexibility of schedules (Mikus, 1980). This probably results in increased reliance on the marital relationship. Ironically, the increased postpartum need for marital support may coincide with a reduction in husband's conciliatory behavior. The heightened 17 attentiveness husbands often show towards their wives during pregnancy generally declines after the baby arives and returns to prepregnancy levels. Speculation is that this decline in attentiveness may be due to the long term nature of the need for support during parenthood. Pregnancy, being more time-limited, may be a safer elicitor of extra attention (Power and Parke, 1984). Variation in the marital satisfaction of parents may be related to the couple's own parenting history. Wives who retrospectively report their parents to be more accepting of them have been found to experience less negative changes in marital satisfaction across the transition to parenthood. The greatest decline in marital adjustment has been found in couples where at least one spouse reports having experienced cold, rejecting parenting and marital discord in the family of origin (Belsky and Isabella, 1985). Mental Health of Mother In general levels of psychological well being, childless married people have been demonstrated to be happier than married people with children and the lowest level of happiness has been found for parents of preschoolers. Parents of preschoolers also report more symptoms of immobilization such as inability to get up in the morning, and having sweaty palms (Antonucci, Tamir and Dubnoff, 1980). Childless married women have been found to have greater feelings of efficacy and higher levels of self esteen and less tendency to feel like they are at the end of their ropes than matched samples of married women with preschoolers (Mikus, 1980). The overwhelming responsibilities which accompany the care of the young child may account for the symptoms of immobilization and the reduced feelings of efficacy may be 18 reality-based. Inability to carry out projected plans or to have control over one's own life is a realistic consequence of having infants and young children under care. Mothers of preschoolers are most likely of all mothers to be disenchanted with their housewife roles and mothers who are disenchanted with the role are most likely of all mothers to experience subclinical depresssion and malaise (Pearlin, 1975). As the age of the mother increases, the experience of disaffection decreases. While mothers of young children are susceptible to disenchantment caused by the extreme demands of the role, older mothers of young children are less susceptible to depression than younger mothers of young children (Pearlin, 1975). How Mothers Cope It seems clear that the period from transition to parenthood through the preschool years places great strains on the parenting system as evidenced by decreases in happiness, well-being and marital satisfaction and increases in subclinical depression. The following section will examine factors that ameliorate the effects of early stress. A single stress will not necessarily be experienced similarly by everyone. This is partly because individuals have varying degrees of efficient coiping strategies to meet the stress, and coping affects the outcome. Coping strategies can include internal and external strategies. Internal strategies may be direct action, action inhibition, information search, or intrapsychic action. They can be designed to solve problems or to ameliorate the emotional response to the stress (Roskies and Lazarus, 1980). 19 One internal strategy that has been shown to influence the outcome of the birthing experience is information search. Prenatal preparation for childbirth and for early parenting has been demonstrated to be associated with less medication during labor and delivery, more positive feelings towards the baby, higher probability of mothers rooming-in with their babies and higher likelihood of breastfeeding (Entwisle and Doering, 1980). Information seeking may lead to mental rehearsal of an impending stressor which serves as a preparation for a stressful event. Other internal mechanisms include flexibility, learning patience, becoming more organized, and learning new ways to integrate prior important activities into the parental lifestyle (Miller and Sollie, 1980). Social Support One external mode of coping is support from a cooperative environment. Mothers who perceive reception of emotional support from their husbands and friends have been found to feel more energy, fullness of life, and relaxation than those with limited marital support. They also experience better attitudes towards parenting, greater sense of competence in the maternal role, better adaptation to motherhood and better general life satisfaction following birth (Abernathy, 1973: Wandersman and Wandersman, 1980, Crnic et a1, 1983). Moreover, Crnic et al found that it is the interaction between intimate support and life stress, rather than the stress alone, which predicts life satisfaction. Mothers with high stress who also report high levels of support report greater life satisfaction than mothers who experience high stress and low support indicating that support exerts a moderating effect on perceived stress. 20 Stresssed mothers are less positive towards their infants and less likely to respond to infant cues. Their infants then proceed to give obscure cues to their mothers making maternal response difficult (Crnic et a1, 1983). This relationship is somewhat alleviated by social support. Social support has been shown to impact positively on maternal stimulation provided to the infant (Pascoe, Loda, Jeffries and Earp, 1981) and on maternal affective response to infant which in turn affects infant's affective response to mother (Crnic et a1 1983; Belsky, 1983). Mothers with social network support are more likely to play with their preschool children in goal-oriented tasks. Their children, in turn, are not only superior in performance of these tasks but also in general academic performance (Cochran and Brassard, 1979). Mothers of children born at risk due to prematurity provide more appropriate play materials, more opportunity for variety in daily stimulation and organize the child's environment more optimally if they experience adequate support (Pascoe, Loda et al, 1981). Mothers with greater social support also tend to be less restrictive and punitive with their children (Coletta, 1979). Of all the forms of support reported, the least available to new mothers seems to be friendship support. This can best be understood in light of the limited contact mothers of preschoolers have with friends. In one study of mothers of preschoolers, 502 reported having either few or no friends (Mikus, 1980) and although parents of preschoolers use high levels of informal social support, they make less use of friends than at any other stage of the family life cycle (Antonucci et a1, 1980). Although relatives form an important support 21 contingency, they are most useful when living in close proximity to the young family. Neighborhood associations and day to day contact appear to have stronger association to parenting outcome than more distal and infrequent contacts (Abernathy, 1973; Crittendon, 1985). The mechanism through which social support affects new parents' sense of competence and mastery, comfort in the parental role, or behavior towards their children is not directly understood. However, social support is postulated to provide specific benefits to parents. These range from informational and idealogical support about child-rearing practices to concrete and material services such as financial assistance and babysitting. Social contacts may provide emotional assistance to buffer the stresses of the young parent and can also serve as models of positive parenting behavior and sanctions against negative behaviors such as authoritarianism or abuse (Cochran and Brassard, 1979; Power and Parke, 1984). Transition to parenthood has been discussed in the preceding sections in terms of its negative consequences, its toll on mother's mental health, marital relationships and life satisfaction. Personality characteristics, ego functioning, situational variables, and coping responses that positively impact on the outcome of the transition have been reviewed. In the following sections, the impact of the adult mother's age on the successful outcome of the transition is discussed. Adult Development While there is common consensus among life-span developmental psychologists and sociologists that psychological change and growth continues through the adult years, the impetus for this developmental 22 growth is subject to debate. Rossi (1980) has identified two distinct theories regarding change during the life course. One, held by developmental stage theorists and exemplified by Erikson (1959), Vaillant (1977) and Levinson et a1 (1978) postulates time-linked stages of adult development precipitated by normative life crises. The adult is expected to face chronologically determined peaks of evaluation about himself and his belief systems necessitating decisions about life choices. Normative life events are superimposed upon this chronologicl time line of development. In the present study, it was hypothesized that adjustment to a particular transitional life event such as beginning parenthood would be influenced by adult personality development and the extent to which stage specific adult tasks have been accomplished. Alternatively, the "timing of events" model does not predict a stage related sequence of crisis confrontation and resolution. Rather, the adult life course follows a gradual anticipated time sequence for major life events. Stress, then, is not the inevitable result of universal age-related crises but rather occurs when there is a violation of anticipated timing of major life events. Neugarten (1979) suggests that chronological age is not as significant a marker in adulthood as it is in childhood. She suggests that there is currently less uniformity in our society than in previous eras. As we move towards an 'age-irrelevant society', the ages at which life events occur vary widely. Therefore individuals judge themselves in relation to social and biological processes such as parenting, work roles, and physiological functioning and not in relation to chronological age as social roles become more important 23 than chronological markers. The increasing trend towards simultaneous role assumption in our society may trigger increased stress. For instance women who are trying to balance competing demands such as those of motherhood and work roles may experience more stress than those who make the traditional sequential commitments to these major roles. What's more, women may experience increased tension when involvement in one set of role functions causes other role transitons to be out of line with temporal expectations (Neugarten, 1979). But as Rossi (1980) points out: precisely because of the great variance of social and psychological attributes in relation to chronological age there is an excellent opportunity for research to establish the relative contributions of the timing and sequencing of both social and biological events and processes, but to date there have been no such studies directed to these questions" (p.13). The Adult Life Course Erikson is considered by many to be the father of the psychology of adult personality development. Unlike Freud and Piaget whose stages of personality and cognitive development end with the culmination of childhood, Erikson's theory spans the life cycle, and the last three stages of personality development take place during adulthood. In the case of men, the resolution of the crisis of identity during adolescence triggers the pursuit of intimacy, (Erikson, 1959) probably with their wives as their "intimacy mentors" (Rossi, 1980). Following this stage is the stage of generativity vs. stagnation or the challenge of establishing and guiding the next generation. Finally, late adulthood is marked by integrity or despair; either one accepts one's life's work and accomplishments or despairs at the dissatisfaction with one's life. 24 Erikson's stages have been further differentiated in several different schemes of adult development. Levinson et a1 (1979) posit that the life cycle is a series of structure-building and transitional, sructure-changing periods. These stable and unstable years respectively are well circumscribed in terms of chronological age. Levinson's schema is based on a comprehensive study of 40 men aged 35-45 who provided both current and retrospective accounts of their lives. In this scheme, preadulthood extends from birth to age 22. Early adulthood lasts from age 17 to 45 with the overlap years of ages 17 to 22 serving as the early adult transitional period in which the structures of childhood are terminated and the structures of young adulthood are built. The midlife transition lasts from ages 40 to 45 and middle adulthood from 40 to 65. The years 60 to 65 constitute the late adult transition with late adulthood beginning at age 60. Each structure changing period and structure building period has its own agendas and tasks to be completed and the tasks are unique to the life stage. An event such as birth of a child, which Levinson and his collegues call a marker event, will be experienced and handled differently at different life stages because the adult evolves and changes psychologically with each life structure. As Levinson et a1 (1979) point out: We need to regard marker events from the viewpoint of development. They can occur at various ages and do not in themselves cause the start or end of a period. However, the age at which an event occurs is important. The significance of a marker event for an individual depends partly upon its place in the sequence of developmental period." (p.55). 25 The job for the transitional period is to tear down the old structures and create possibilities for new ones. These are periods of reappraisal and of making choices for the next phase. These are the most painful periods. They are unstable and uncertain. According to Levinson, the outcome of a marker event will depend on the individual's current developmental task. For example, the boy who marries at age 18 or 19 is in the middle of the early adult transition. The task for this period is to break away from parents, and the marriage may occur before confidence in autonomy is fully established. The young man may therefore be drawn to a protective, dominating figure onto whom he can shift his dependency. The struggle for independence which ensues may impede his adult development. A marker event, such as beginning parenting, at the beginning of a period will be bound up with the struggles of entering that period. A marker event which takes place at the end of a period may reflect the culmination of growth-producing introspection and experience (Levinson et a1, 1979). Support for this viewpoint comes from a study of the timing of parenthood by Daniels and Weingarten (1982). While these authors found that issues of intimacy and individuality permeated the period of transition to parenthood regardless of when it occurred in their subjects, the nature of the struggle was different for those who embarked upon parenthood in their early twenties (their early timing parents) and those who became parents in their early thirties (their late timing parents). For the early timers, parenthood often came at a time when the couple had not yet established firm identities or life goals. Their one agenda was self discovery. Some of the women described the feeling of never having had an individual identity; they 26 spoke of moving rapidly from being someone's daughter to being someone's mother with no time in between to find out who they were. The experience was overwhelming and led to feelings of inadequacy. Early timing parents in this study were more likely to live close to their parents and depend on them for emotional support, financial support and childcare assistance. In contrast, the late timers rarely depended on their families of origin for assistance as they had spent the decade of the twenties differentiating from their parents. They had also spent that time establishing identities in terms of work and love relationships. These parents faced problems of integrating the new role of parenthood into a preexisting life structure, discovering how much of the old structure they could maintain without sacrificing the new and how much they would have to alter. The major tasks were with integrating the demands of new role of mother with the old ones of worker and wife. The authors sum up by concluding that for those who begin in the early twenties, parenthood is often a vehicle for establishing autonomy from parents and a marker for the threshhold to an adult identity. For those who postponed parenthood until the early thirties, parenthood often marked the end of a period of exploration at a time when most had a "reflective and emotionally unthreatening distance from or identification with (one's) own parents, and a sanguine stance toward (one's) own childhood, all of which add up to a readiness to risk taking responsibility for the childhood of one's own children." (p.65). According to Levinson and his asociates, the 20's and 40's period of early adulthood is one in which career choices are made and individuals begin to establish their places in society. He advances 27 along the ladder from novice adult to full adult both in the world of ‘work and of family. This is a paradox. Although the young man is inexperienced and must use the early years to explore and experience so as not to foreclose on options, he must also commit himself to a greater or lesser extent in order to form stable ties which will carry him through adulthood. These involve making career commitments, so the young man can apprentice, find a mentor, and start to move up the "corporate ladder". He also makes family commitments including finding a wife with whom to establish intimacy, and starting a family. Without these commitments, the young man is rootless and does not form the necessary structures. Yet he must make these lifelong choices before he has experienced enough of life to know how to make them wisely. Between 22 and 28, the young man is mastering his trade and most of his creative energies go into that endeavor in pursuit of success. There is little energy wasted in considering whether commitmentss are appropriate or not. By the end of the 20's, the bluffed competencies of the early 20's have turned into real competencies, independence from parents has been established and competence proven (Levinson, 1980; Gould, 1980). Kenniston (1971) argues that young people in our culture engage in a period of extended youth through the decade of their twenties which is unique to this period in history and is culturally determined. He postulates that the extended mass education, widespread affluence, extensive exposure to different cultures and threat of holocaust in this century has led to a new stage of youth in which moral judgement has been individualized and truth become more relative. Tradition is no longer accepted uncritically and this has 28 led to an extended period of restless questioning and individual exploration. Whereas in the past this behavior was restricted to a privileged few, the nonconformist thinkers and innovators, currently it is typical of a whole class of educated, affluent young people. This viewpoint is more radical than that of the previously cited authors in which youth is viewed as a time of structured exploration through commitments rather than unstructured exploration. The discrepancy between the theories of Levinson, Vaillant and Keniston may be reflective of a cohort difference in samples of individual observed. Subjects in Levinson's and Vaillant's studies all were in their twenties and beginning their careers in the post World War II conservative era. Keniston's observations were based on individuals reaching their twenties in the more liberal era of the 1960's. Replication of the findings of the two major longitudinal studies of Levinson and Vaillant is necessary with both men and women of other cohorts in order to determine the generalizability of their time line to other generations. In all of the samples described, however, a transition of sorts occurred at approximately age 30 (28-33 in Levinson's sample). At this time, the young man begins to question the life structure that he has built. It is his chance to make corrections. Exploration is no longer felt to be appropriate and firm decisions are made. This transition leads to new commitments as the young man settles down in the next period, ages 30 to 40. It is at this time that he works towards realization of his dreams (Levinson, 1980). It is not until the 40's transition that work goals are again reevaluated in relation to the occupational dream and men begin turning away from the world of work, 29 which does not hold the promise of total fulfillment it once did, and begin turning towards the family for greater fulfillment. Men's interest in and capacity for intimacy typically increase at this point. Interestingly, when Levinson speaks of the three major tasks of young adulthood, he includes occupation, relating to women, and separation from parents. Family formation is not mentioned, despite the fact that many of the men in his study became parents during this period. In contrast, establishing a parental identity is one of the major tasks for women in this period. To sum up, the adult life course for men proceeds from separation from parents to establishment of identity either through commitment and structured work and love relationships (Gould, 1972; Vaillant, 1977; Levinson et al, 1978) or unstructured and unfettered exploration (Keniston, 1971). With identity firmly established, men move on to learn about intimacy through love, marital and family relationships (Erikson, 1959). But during this time, family is peripheral and work is central. These priorities begin to shift as the man nears 40 and the mid-life transition. This progresssion differs for women. Identity and the establishment of intimate relationships are often linked for women (Gilligan, 1979). For many, there are no work relationships to aid in the acquisition of confidence and feelings of efficacy. For some, work is halted or deferred until after family formation. Women differ from men in that intensive commitments to family usually usher in adulthood and a shift to work priorities often occurs only at the midlife transition after family responsibilities have diminished (Daniels and Weingarten, 1982). 30 Until data from a longitudinal study of adult development in women is available, discrepancies between male and female models of development can only be surmised from cross-sectional data. Judith Bardwick postulates a parallel line of female development to that of male development (Bardwick, 1980). There is some evidence that the harbinger of adulthood, identity formation, develops along different lines for women than for men. Male identity formation is typically expressed in terms of the self. Young men's identities center around career choice, individual talents, goals and accomplishments. On the other hand, female identity is more often expressed in connected, relational terms than in self-oriented instrumental terms. Even among today's young women for whom work force participation will comprise a major portion of adulthood, individual dreams and life goals are often expressed in terms of heterosexual, marital and parental relationships. Where work and family will be combined, compromises to the famiy will most often continue to fall within the woman's domain and commitment to identity within the work role will usually still come second to commitment to familial roles. Individual needs and goals are still perceived as secondary to the egocentric needs of young children and often to the preeminent needs of the career-building husband. Indeed, for those women whose preparental and possibly premarital years have been devoted to the building of the self structure, subordination of individual needs to those of the family can be stressful. The clash between traditional upbringing and liberated lifestyles can create conflict for the present cohort of young adult women. The age 30 transition in which goals and life courses are reevaluated is a particularly poignant time for women today. Some 31 women will have delayed childbearing for career or educational purposes. For them, the age 30 transition may usher in the decision to have or forego children. In others, employment may have been delayed to allow for the care of young children. With 502 of all mothers of preschool age children currently employed (Waldman, 1983), many women will be reentering the work force in their late 20's and early 30's. Thus for women confronting the age 30 transition, decisions may have to be made regarding the path, either work or parenting, which has remained untraveled. The age 30 transition is one in which options are realistically evaluated. Some will be maintained, some will be altered, others abandoned. At age 40, the same independence that reinforces the adult identification for men may produce anxiety and conflict in women raised with traditional interdependent values, particularly if career involvement has precluded establishment of marital or parental relationships (Bardwick, 1980). Another departure from the male course may occur during midlife. Women often experience increased independence and autonomous outward looking perspective at just about the same time as men begin turning towards the family and discovering the more nurturant parts of themselves (Guttman, 1975). Thus men in their 50's become more feminized while women of this age, with children growing up and leaving the home, become more masculinized in their self-orientation and participation in the extrafamilial world. It is of interest to discover how women's personality development and personal adjustment differs for those who follow the male model of exploration and/or work commitment preceding intense 32 family commitment from those with a more traditional female model of family commitment preceding establishment of a work identity. To answer this question, research on women's roles and their relationship to occupational success, mental health, life satisfaction and transition to parenthood is reviewed. CombiningiWork and Family Whereas men are expected to combine marriage, family and work in the 20's, it is not until the mid 30's to early 40's that they begin the focus on the family (Levinson, 1979; Vaillant, 1978; Rossi, 1980). Only then do they truly explore the realm of intimacy and relationships which are the woman's domain. Women have more options in the timing of work and family involvement. A woman can choose between motherhood and work or she can choose to combine the two either sequentially or simultaneously (Daniels and Weingarten, 1982). The sequential pattern involves an interruption of work, or delaying of entering the work force until a later point in the family life cycle (for instance after the children are in elementary school or high school or after they have left home). A woman can choose to coordinate family and work simultaneoulsy, but both the sequential and simultaneous patterns have their prices. In a sample of 41 female doctorate recipients who were born between 1893 and 1906, the choice between sequential and simultaneous patterns of marriage and education had long term occupational consequences. Those who engaged in a sequential pattern of education preceeding marriage received their Ph.D. degrees in the decade of their 20's. Those who engaged in marriage and completion of the Ph.D. simultaneously obtained their advanced degrees in their late 20's to 33 early 30's. Those who married first and then obtained doctorates completed their degrees latest, in the decade of the 30's and 40's. The timing of the receipt of the degree was highly significant in terms of ultimate career accomplishments. More women who received doctorates at an early age became professors. Of the 20 women with children, all were employed at lower ranking institutions at age 60. All of the women in this sample had careers that did not match up to the male professional model (Perun and Del Vento Bielby, 1980). In considering career status using the criteria of full versus part time status, actual numbers of hours worked, career interruptions of one or more years, and career goals, most women's jobs would not be defined as careers but rather as "occupation-oriented professional involvements" (Poloma and Garland, 1971). Career orientations were judged in a study of 53 married professional women of whom all were either attorneys, physicians or university professors. Although 35 of the 53 worked full time, only 17 of these worked more than 40 hours per week and only 4 worked more than 50 hours per week whereas most of their husbands worked over 40 hours per week. Whereas the husbands with limited work weeks were involved in community or professional activities, only 2 of the wives were. 0f the 53 women, almost half had no career goals and only 17 had relatively uninterrupted professional careers. Eight of these 17 had no children or had not yet begun their families (Poloma and Garland, 1971). For the women who were unable to make full commitments to their occupations during earlier stages of the family life cycle, career involvement increased when the children were old enough to be in school. A ten year follow-up contact revealed that many of the women considered their child-rearing years as their job 34 stage (as defined above). After family demands decreased and the children were launched, they embarked upon the career stage (Poloma, Pendleton and Garland, 1981). In a study of husband and wife psychologist couples, husbands were found to be more likely than their wives to hold academic positions. The geographical moves necessitated by their husbands' careers resulted in a shorter mean duration of employment in the wife's position. Husbands, on average, were more productive in publications, received higher salaries and worked longer hours. Wives more often than husbands were discriminated against by anti-nepotism laws and by offers of less rewarding positions. Professional wives reported lower levels of career satisfaction than both their professional husbands and than female psychologists not married to other psychologists (Bryson, Bryson, Licht, and Licht, 1976). Daniels and Weingarten (1982) found that of the 76 women they interviewed all had "pulled back" from their outside work when they became mothers. Although 52 of the mothers were sequential timing workers, 20 of the mothers worked right through the period of early mothering. The simultaneous workers either worked part time or just had less extra energy to devote to work than they normally would have had. The full commitment to work was held in abeyance until the children had achieved a degree of independence. Of these 20 women who chose the simultaneous pattern of work and family, 16 were late timing parents. These were predominantly college educated women who had postponed childhood in order to pursue goals such as finishing education, establishing a career, or experimenting with work and love 35 relationships before making firm.commitments. For those women who choose simultaneous patterns of role involvements, there is potential for role strain. Working mothers may find it difficult to fulfill the competing obligations of work and parenting and may find the conflicting demands on their time, energy and other resources excessive resulting in role overload (Goode, 1960). According to the scarcity theory of human energy allocation, total fulfillment of all the demands of both roles may be impossible because an individual's energy resources are finite. An excess of role obligations can lead to an energy drain and force compromise in one or more positions. The multiple role holder's position becomes more complicated when socially prescribed norms for prioritizing role obligations are ambiguous. For example, missed work due to a child's illness is often unacceptable to employers but necessary from the family perspective. This lack of concensus can produce role conflict (Coser and Rokoff, 1971). A competing theory of role accumulation, the expansion theory, postulates that individuals accrue benefits with added roles. If the rewards exceed the burdens, multiple roles yield a net gain. Certain positions are associated with privileges, security, power, personal enrichment and gratifications which compensate for demands. Higher status roles also carry with them additional freedoms and independence and the right to delegate undesirable responsibilities. What's more, successes in one sphere can compensate for failure or tedium in another and may act as a buffer or actually create energy for use elsewhere (Sieber, 1974; Marks, 1977). 36 When role commitments begin to encraoch upon one another, the response is to reduce activities, reduce the time allocated to them, or delegate them. Where the work place is intolerant of diminished role performance, compromises are sometimes made in family responsibilities since status from homemaking activities is minimal and socially valued privileges are few (Marks, 1977). Family activities in this culture are not equally expendable for women and for men. When women do distribute or curtail household activities, they find some chores more readily dispensed with than others. In middle class households with dual incomes, housework is often delegated to reduce role strain but child care responsibilities are not usually seen as amenable to compromise (Rapoport and Rapoport, 1969; Weingarten, 1978). Moreover, household chores may be shared among the parental pair as a means of reducing the wife's role overload. On the other hand, women do not usually share child care equally with their spouses regardless of employment status (Weingarten, 1978; Pleck, 1982; Barnett and Baruch, 1984). Interestingly, the greater the husband's involvement in child care tasks, the greater the wife's satisfaction regardless of her work status but the more critical the husband is of his wife's mothering (Barnett and Baruch, 1984). A mother's satisfaction with her husband's child care involvement is highly predictive of her adjustment and satisfaction, regardless of the objective number of hours he contributes (Pleck, 1982). Along mental health dimensions, working women have been characterized as higher on dimensions of internal locus of control and mastery. They see their lives as having followed their own decisions. 37 Those with little or no work experience see their lives as having evolved outside of their own control when polled late in life (Willensen, 1980: Barnett, 1984). They have lower anxiety levels and report higher energy levels than non-working women (Walker, 1980: Revilock, 1982). Among the working classes, employed mothers report greater satisfaction with their lives and interest in what they do than nonemployed women (Ferree, 1976). Working women at middle life have higher self-esteem and less psychological anxiety than non-working women and report themselves as being in better physical health (Coleman and Antonucci, 1983). Work is experienced differently by those who consider themselves as career-minded from those who do not. Work has been associated with positive feelings about the self and greater life satisfaction to a larger extent among women who consider themselves as career-oriented. Non-career oriented working women have been found to experience greater role strain than professional women. Career women obtain more support from their spouses, and this appears to be a crucial determinant'of perceived role conflict (Holahan, 1979: Markus, 1980). Limited study has been undertaken of working mothers' perceptions of the consequences of their employment decisions on childrearing. Hock (1978) found that working mothers of 3-4 month old infants, all of whom happened to be career-minded, were less apt to see their infants as experiencing separation anxiety when they left their infants than were non-working mothers. They were also less likely to experience anxiety when leaving their babies in the care of others and less likely to see infant discontent as a personal affront. Career-minded non-working mothers were the most likely to perceive 38 infant distress at maternal separation even though separation anxiety ‘would not be expected in such young infants. Either their beliefs regarding infant distress discouraged their participation in the labor force or the cognitive dissonance they experienced from their homemaker roles prompted such a belief system. These mothers may believe that if they are staying at home, it must be because the child needs them. By eight months, maternal attitudes were reflected in infant behavior. Infants of non-working mothers who believed in the importance of providing exclusive mothering to their children more frequently and intensely attempted to maintain proximity to their mothers than those whose mothers did not stress exclusive mothering. Infants of working mothers who believed in the necessity of exclusive mothering produced fewer proximity seeking behaviors towards their mothers. It may be that when working mothers experience role conflict, anxiety interferes with the mother-child relationship (Hock, 1980). Women who postpone childrearing until they have established themselves in careers may be more likely to have followed the male model of career development up until the time of family formation and therefore to follow Levinson's sequence of identity formation at least in part through the pursuit of the occupational dream in the decade of the 20's. If this is the case one would anticipate higher levels of competence and confidence in self for those mothers who begin parenthood in their late 20's rather than their early 20's. For those who postpone until their early 30's, one would anticipate a reevaluation of roles and relationships to coincide or immediately precede the beginning of the parental life cycle. These mothers would be in the midst of self-examination and evaluation of life goals and 39 should be expected to be in various stages of role conflict and role resolution. Some older mothers would be expected to experience less of a need to explore and experience different aspects of life and should be more prepared than younger mothers to settle down and to find stability either in the world of work, or family or some combination of the two. Other older mothers may experience heightened role conflict because beginning parenthood coincides with the period of reevaluation or impinges upon an established career. The Timing;of Parenthood Daniels and Weingarten (1982) have looked at the impact of timing of the first birth on identity formation in parents, quality of marriage, and mothers' work patterns. Although they provide interesting anecdotal data of early and late timing couples, the methodology employed makes the conclusions difficult to evaluate. These authors interviewed 72 couples regarding the transition to parenthood and the effect of the timing of parenthood on later life events. The sample consisted of groups of 24 couples in the fourth, fifth and sixth decades of life. Twelve of the couples in each of the three groups had made the transition to parenthood in their early 20's (the early timers) and 12 in their early 30's (the late timers). No middle 20's group was included. For some of the subjects (e.g. the 30 year-old late-timing parents) the data are prospective. For others they are retrospective (eg. the 30 year-old early-timers). Thus group comparisons are very tenuous due to the discrepancy in timing of interview relative to stage of family formation. Moreover, the sample was not random and was accumulated through word of mouth rendering the representativeness in question. Lastly, none of the interview data was 4O coded or measured, rather the authors offered vingettes which they considered reflective of the interviewees. For these reasons, generalizability of findings is difficult. Daniels and Weingarten found that more late timing parents than early timing parents were satisfied with their timing decisions (67% vs. 422) and only 242 of the late timing parents said they would start their families earlier if they had it to do over again. Of the early timers, 562 said they would have waited longer if they had it to do over again. Reasons that late timers gave for purposefully postponing parenthood were awaiting psychological readiness, setting aside time to explore and grow and accumulate life experience (a response which was mostly offered by college educated couples), discovering career options, and establishing the marital relationship. Nonpurposive late timers primarilly cited infertility as a reason for postponement. The late timers were more planful of the timing than were early tuners. Although all couples said that the nine months of pregnancy provided sufficient opportunity to come to terms with the family timing outcome, some experienced feelings of frustration and disappointment at being out of control of the situation. In Neugarten's terms, they were ”off-time" on this major life event. In terms of the marital adjustment, early timers had their first child an average of 14.5 months after the marriage whereas late timers' first borns arrived an average of 4 years after the marriage. The late timers were described as having more time to create a balance between work and family and between self and other before facing the demands of parenthood. 41 Early timing women did much of the caretaking on their own as 'husbands devoted their energies to the early stages of work. They received little emotional support from their husbands but provided a good deal for their husbands who were more wrapped up in work and self-exploration. In contrast, late timers described more reciprocal relationships in which both husband and wife nurtured one another and although even late timers did not split the child care evenly, they had much more egalitarian households. Early timers had more traditional household arrangements with less conflict over division of responsibilities. The late timers, having established organizational skills at work and a sense of competence, fell more easily into a work rhythm than did the early timers. Late timers were more decisive in their new roles, but experienced more role conflict and required more adjustment going from co-provider to houseperson. In summarizing their observations, the authors noted that early timing couples were less defined as individuals at the point of transition, they were less separated from their parents, less nurturant of one another and less likely to develop egalitarian household arrangements. Late timers were more likely to experience conflict in adjusting to the wife's new role and occupation and more likely to experience conflict arriving at division of household responsibilities. These findings support the hypothesis that maternal age at first birth will differentially impact upon mother's adjustment. However the methodological drawbacks of this study argue for caution. Age of subject, timing of parenthood and cohort effects are all confounded. All of the early timing accounts are retrospective and most but not all of the late timing accounts are retrospective. Little of the data is 42 systematically compared. Other differences found between older and younger mothers are as follows. Older mothers have children with slightly higher IQ's than younger mothers. There is a small but significant linear relationship between maternal age from ages 20 to 40 and children's performance on the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Revised (WISC-R). Children's IQ scores have been found to be an average of 2.84-3.17 IQ points higher when their mothers were 40 years of age at the time of birth than when their mothers were 20 years of age. However, these authors do not distinguish first-born from later-born children's scores so mother's age and birth order may be confounded (Belmont, Cohen, Dryfoos, Stein and Zayas, 1981). Older mothers have been found to be more flexible and warmer and to use less physical punishment and to encourage more verbalization and discourage dependence (Sears, Maccoby and Levin, 1957). Older couples are more likely to be settled in jobs, to own homes, to have savings and be more secure financially than younger parents. Work demands are usually less extreme for older parents who may then be more capable of handling competing demands of work and home (Wilkie, 1981). In a study by Ragozin and his colleagues, older mothers were found to have greater satisfaction with parenting, to have greater time commitments to maternal role and to be more responsive to their babies. It is suggested that greater emotional maturity and lesser egocentrism underlie the differential attitudes and behavior of older mothers (Ragozin, Basham, Crnic, Greenberg, and Robinson, 1982). Mothers in the study ranged in age from 16 to 38, but no specific information was given regarding the age breakdown other than to indicate that the ages were normally distributed. This 43 suggests that the older mothers were underrepresented in this sample. Since analyses were limited to linear regression and no group comparisons were made, it is impossible to know if the bulk of the predictive power of the age variable comes from the differences between teenage mothers and adult mothers or whether there were also group differences between mothers in their early and late 20's or between mothers in their 20's and 30's. The results do suggest that age continues to discriminate between maternal behaviors and attitudes through the 30's in a unidirectional linear fashion suggesting a continued age influence through early adulthood. In summarizing the sparse information concerning adult maternal age and transition to parenthood, it appears that older mothers are inclined to be more involved in extrafamilial activities than are younger mothers (Rindfuss and Bumpass, 1976), to follow different career patterns, to have more egalitarian households, to have more spousal support and less family support and to have more role conflict betwween work and family (Daniels and Weingarten, 1982). They experience less depression (Pearlin, 1975), and derive more satisfaction from the parenting role (Ragozin et al, 1982). They are more responsive to their infants, more competent at eliciting responses and use more positive affect (Ragozin et al, 1982). They are warmer and more flexible and foster more autonomy (Sears et al, 1957) and they have children with slightly higher IQ's (Belmont et al, 1981). Summagy The transition to parenthood for primiparous mothers is recognized as a stressful period in which a major reorganization of roles and lifestyles is required. It is responsible for reductions in 44 Inarital satisfaction and maternal mental health and may constitute a crisis in the adult life.[:Certain factors can predispose a woman to a successful transition to parenthood. These include available social support, adaptive personality characteristics and a high desire for the motherhood. Work outside the home may operate in one of two ways. The competing demands it produces may cause role overload and poor adaptation. Alternatively, the valued contributions that employment provides may enhance the mother's sense of self-worth and accomplishment and improve adaptation by serving as a buffer against the stresses of parenthood. Finally, the adult mother's age at first birth may impact on her adjustment. Increased age may provide the added maturity a mother requires to accomodate to her infant's needs or it may increase the difficulty of transition. Older mothers may experience extra conflict between work and parenting because they are used to reaping the benefits of gainful employment and involvement in the extrafamilial world unhindered by the demands of a young child. The present study examined the impact of an adult mother's age and work status on her transition to parenthood. There has been a limited amount of research on the impact of an adult mother's age at first birth on her responsivity to her infant and her satisfaction with the role. The available research has been problematic. In one account, mothers above the age of 30 were underrepresented and the nature of the data analysis did not allow for group comparisons between various age groups of adult women. What's more, positive results in favor of older mothers appeared to have been heavily influenced by the inclusion of teenage parents in the analysis. 45 The combination of work and mothering roles has been found to 'have felicitous effects on the mental health of the mother and, under certain circumstances, to increase satisfaction and skill in parenting. However, the combination of these two demanding roles at the point of transition to parenthood has received only limited attention to date. The one published study which addressed this question contained methodological drawbacks. Age of subject, timing of parenthood and cohort effects were all confounded. Moreover, little of the data were compared systematically and findings were presented primarily as anecdotal accounts. A uniformly prospective examination of the transition to motherhood in which subjects are contacted close to the point of transition is necessary to examine this experience. The present study contacted mothers within the first six months of life and surveyed their experiences during the early months of motherhood to determine the impact of age and work status on the experience of mothering. Only adult mothers were included in the sample so as to avoid comparison with teenage parents whose experiences have been found to differ from those of older mothers. Statement of Hypotheses The purpose of this study was to systematically compare primiparous women in their 20's and 30's on levels of adjustment to parenthood, role conflict and satisfaction, responsiveness to infants and adaptive coping. In light of the group differences which have been found in previous studies between older and younger mothers of infants and young children, the following hypotheses were proposed. 46 1. It was predicted that older women would adapt to parenthood ‘more successfully than younger women, would be more satisfied with the parental role, and would be more responsive to their infants. This was an attempt to replicate the findings of Ragozin et al, 1982. 2. It was predicted that older women would have more effective coping mechanisms than younger women due to increased opportunities for adult maturation. 3. It was predicted that women with more adaptive coping responses would score higher on measures of successful adaptation and satisfaction with motherhood. This was based on previous reports of a relationship between social support and successful mothering (Crnic et al, 1983). 4. It was predicted that older mothers would experience higher levels of role conflict than younger mothers. This was an attempt to replicate the findings of Daniels and Weingarten (1982). 5. It was predicted that older mothers who experienced lower levels of satisfaction with parenthood would report higher levels of role competition. 6. It was predicted that adaptation to parenthood could be understood in terms of its relationship to the variables maternal age, role conflict, active coping, and responsive attitudes toward infants. Predictor variables were: age of mother, level of role competition, and level of adaptive coping responses such as social support. Outcome variables were satisfaction with maternal role, and responsivity to infant needs. METHODS Sample Subjects in this study were recruited from the greater Baltimore - Washington area. They were identified and contacted through published birth announcements (n-30), prenatal childbirth education classes (n-25), a non-hospital based midwife serviced birthing center (n-22), postnatal classes for new mothers (n-16), pediatricians' offices (n=7) and prenatal exercise classes (n-S). A number of subjects responded to advertisements of the study in parenting newsletters (n-10) and others were identified through a networking process in which subjects recommended their friends to the examiner (n-10). Any woman who was about to become a mother for the first time or whose first child was under six months of age was eligible to participate. The upper infant age limit of six months was selected to avoid the comparison of ambulatory and preambulatory infants. Of the 148 women who agreed to participate and who were mailed questionnaires, 125 responded yielding an 842 response rate. Maternal Characteristics Mothers' ages ranged from 19 to 40 (mean=28). All but 4 of the mothers were married. Mothers' education ranged from high school graduate level to postgraduate level. The mean education level was college attendance and the mode was postgraduate. Mean income was between $20,000-$30,000 and the modal income was $30,000 or over. One hundred and twenty-one of the mothers were white. Eighty-five percent of the pregnancies had been planned (n=106) and all but two of the subjects had attended prenatal childbirth education classes. Forty-six 47 48 nmythers (36%) attended postnatal meetings at a parents' organization. Forty of the mothers were working, 74 were not working outside the home and 11 were on maternity leave at the time of the study. Of the mothers who were working or on leave, 25 were full time workers, 24 were part time workers and the work status of 2 is unknown. Of the 74 mothers who did not work, all had reported having worked at sometime in the past and all but eight believed they would return to work sometime in the future. Sixty-seven of the mothers were breast-feeding their infants, 32 were bottle feeding and 26 engaged in some combination of breast and bottle feeding (see Table 1, Appendix A, for a summary of maternal characteristics). When asked about the timing of the pregnancy, approximately half the sample (n866) reported having postponed their first child. Modal postponement was from 1-5 years but the range was from less than one year to greater than 10 years. The most common reasons given for postponement (in order of frequency of occurrence) were: establishment of a strong marital relationship: financial reasons; mother's emotional preparedness to parent: mother's establishment in a job or completion of an education: father's emotional preparedness, establishment in a job or completion of an education: and inability to conceive. Infant Characteristics Babies ranged in age from three weeks to nine months (mean-3 months, mode=2 months). They were evenly distributed by sex (62 female, 63 male). Mean infant birth weight was 3283 grams and only 4 of the infants weighed less than 2500 grams at birth. Fourteen of the mothers reported their babies to have been ill some time since birth but reports of infant colic, rashes, sleeping and feeding disturbances 49 ranged from 13 incidences of feeding problems to 24 incidences of ‘rashes (see Table 2, Appendix A, for summary of infant characteristics). Procedure Separate procedures were used for subjects contacted prenatally and those contacted postnatally. Both will be described below. The study was described to those mothers who were contacted during pregnancy. They were then asked to provide a mailing address and infant due date. Six weeks after the estimated birth date, these mothers were mailed a questionnaire regarding their attitudes towards childrearing and towards work, satisfaction with parenthood, available social support and outside activities and decisions regarding the timing of childbearing. Questions about infant and family characteristics were also included in the mailing (see Appendix B). The six week lower infant age limit was chosen to allow for the earliest adjustment to parenthood to have been initiated and for coping resources to have been mobilized. Some infants younger than six weeks are included because of an under approximation of infant age from the estimated due date. For mothers identified after the birth of the baby, information regarding infant birth date was acquired and questionnaires were mailed immediately to mothers of infants aged six weeks and over. For mothers of younger infants, questionnaires were mailed after the infant reached six weeks of age. Although the upper infant age limit for the study is six months, some older infants were included due to a delay in completion of the questionnaire. 50 Mothers were provided with stamped, self-addressed envelopes for return of the questionnaire. In addition, they were asked to complete and return an informed consent form. All returned questionnaires were assigned code numbers and mothers' names were separated from their responses to insure anonymity. Construction of the Questionnaire To test the hypothesis that older and younger mothers would vary on the dimension of responsive attitudes towards infants, a responsivity to infant scale was constructed. This was derived from the Maternal Attitude Scale (Cohler, Weiss, and Grunebaum, unpublished manual) and consists of a subset of items from the scale labeled encouragement of positive interaction with the child and from the subscales involving mother-infant reciprocity. Items were selected based on applicability to infants in the age range of the study which addressed attitudes towards reciprocal responding to infant cues. Items geared toward mothers of older infants were not included. The questions concerning adjustment to parenthood and satisfaction with the mothering role were constructed from scales used in four previous studies. These include Leifer's study of first pregnancy and the transition to motherhood (Leifer, 1977), items from an opinion scale in a study of first birth by Entwisle and Doering (Entwisle and Doering, 1980): the maternal irritability scale of the Parental Attitude Research Instrument (PARI: Schaffer and Manheimer, 1960) and a pilot study by the author which will be described below. Scale reliability and validity data are available for the PARI which has been used in numerous studies of parenting. However, it does not contain a satisfaction with parenthood scale. Therefore, items were selected 51 from this instrument which have been found to predict successful adjustment to parenthood. It was supplemented with items constructed and used in previous studies for which no cross-study reliability data is available. It was the author's intent to include questions from a number of different studies in order to construct a satisfaction with parenthood scale which would be homogeneous and internally consistent based on the current sample. No reliable, homogeneous scale was found which measured role competition between work and mothering roles in mothers of infants. Therefore the questions measuring competition between work and mothering roles were based on items from the Entwisle and Doering opinion scales and an interview protocol used in a study of sex roles by Pearlin (Pearlin, 1975). The Coping Scale was constructed from the author's pilot study. It was designed to discriminate between the following coping strategies. Questions regarding the information search strategy were developed based on a study described by Entwisle and Doering. These authors found that women who sought information and preparation for the childbirth experience through classes or through reading held more positive attitudes towards childbirth and had more positive reactions to the newborn child immediately after birth. The information search component in this study included questions about reading child care books and contacting other mothers or the infant's maternal grandmother with childrearing questions (Doering and Entwisle, 1975). A second component of the coping scale was use of social support from family, friends and pediatrician which has been found to influence successful adjustment to parenthood. The third addressed activities which can 52 serve to lessen the negative emotional reactions to stress. Examples of these are physical exercise and the engagement in other activities outside the home. The last component of the coping scale was passive acceptance of problems with no attempt to cope. Timing of parenthood questions were constructed from the author's pilot study. No published scales were found which addressed the mechanism by which mothers decide when to begin having children or the consequences of this timing decision. Exploring this phenomenon for the purpose of question construction, women in the author's pilot study were asked open-ended questions regarding their decisions to have children. The method by which their responses were formed into closed questions will be described below. The pilot study also included open-ended questions regarding satisfaction with parenthood and coping with the difficulties of parenthood in order to supplement items derived from the studies described above. Combining questions from a number of previous parenting studies and from the pilot study enabled the examiner to accumulate a large pool of items from which to select the final scales. Only those items which formed internally consistent, homogeneous scales based on an a priori cluster analysis were included in the final analysis. Pilot Test For the purpose of the pilot study, respondents were recruited from family practice medical clinics and from published birth announcements in the mid-Michigan area. Fifty-five out of 103 potential respondents between the ages of 18 and 40 who had given birth within one year of the period of study were administered open-ended 53 questionnaires of the author's design regarding their experiences with parenthood. They received questionnaires through the mail with self-addressed stamped return envelopes. Participants were married a mean of 5 years (range-l-IS years) with education evenly divided between high school, college and postgraduate education. Twenty of the women were primiparous and 35 were multiparous. Subjects were predominantly caucasian and mean income fell between $16,000-$20,000. Mean infant age was 4 months (range-l-ZZ months). Half of the sample reported having postponed the pregnancy and the length of postponement averaged 7 years (range-1-12 years: mode81-2 years). Mothers were asked open-ended questions regarding their satisfaction with the parental role, perceived difficulties in parenting and solutions which facilitated coping, factors affecting the timing of childbearing and the consequences of the timing decision. For each question, subject responses were grouped into discreet, mutually exclusive categories by two independent readers until all responses were accounted for. Discrepancies between the two readers were then discussed until a single categorization was agreeable to both. Likert-type questions were constructed by the examiner based on the final category scheme and were added to items measuring satisfaction with parenthood coping and timing of parenthood decisions. Items constructed from the pilot study were included to supplement the published scales when equivalent items were not available. The resulting questionnaire contained 105 five point response items which were anchored strongly agree, agree, undecided, disagree and strongly disagree. Strongly agree was assigned a score of 1 and 54 strongly disagree was assigned a score of 5. Subjects were instructed to leave questions blank when they were not applicable. Socio-demographic data regarding mother's and father's age, income, education and work status and infant's sex, birth weight and health characteristics and the method by which mother fed the infant were requested on a separate form. RESULTS This chapter contains a description of the data reduction and analysis which was conducted in four stages. Scale construction was accomplished with an a priori factor analytic technique. The relationships between these scales were then tested using a structural equation path analysis. Relationships which emerged from the path models were then explored using multivariate analysis of variance and significant results were further tested with more conservative a postiori multiple comparison of means tests. Each of these four stages of data reduction and analysis will be described separately. Scale Constructigg Because the questionnaire consisted of items derived from five different instruments, it was not known which items would load together. Therefore, the entire data set was first submitted to a principal factors factor analysis with iteration and with varimax rotation to determine an initial factor structure. Clusters were then formed by placing all items which loaded highest on the first factor in one cluster. This procedure was repeated with each factor with Eigenvalues of 1.00 or more. As a result, each item was placed in a single cluster. Where items loaded equally highly on more than one factor, the decision for inclusion in a cluster was based on content. All items in a cluster whose valence was in a direction opposite from the majority of items in that cluster were reflected. Thus for all clusters, 1 always signifies strong agreement and 5 always denotes strong disagreement with attitudes expressed in the cluster. 55 56 To test for reliability and homogeneity of scales, these clusters were then submitted to a confirmatory factor analysis using an oblique multiple groups factor analysis with communalities (Nunnaly, 1978) which was run with the computer program PACKAGE (Hunter, Gerbing, Cohen and Nicol, 1980). Clusters were tested for unidimentionality in the manner recommended by Hunter and Gerbing (1982) which includes determination of: 1. homogeneity of content, 2. internal consistency via testing of intra-cluster, inter-item correlations for a Spearman rank one pattern and 3. external consistency or parallelism by examining similarity of correlations of items within a cluster with other cluster scores. Those items which met the above three criteria were retained in their clusters. Others were assigned to different clusters based on content, high item-cluster correlations with the outside cluster and parallel correlations to other clusters. Items which did not fit in any existing cluster but which correlated highly with each other and less highly with other clusters and which correlated with external clusters in a parallel fashion were grouped together into new clusters. Items which did not fit with their own clusters, did not fit in any other clusters and did not form a cluster of their own were placed in a residual cluster and eventually discarded. The resulting clusters were judged to be homogeneous in content, internally consistent and parallel to the other clusters to within sampling error (see Table 3, Appendix A). To further test for internal consistency, an item-correlation matrix was computed with ones on the diagonal and with cluster scores partialed out. The resulting matrix appeared flat to within sampling error (see Table 4, Appendix A). To test for external consistency, 57 item-scale total correlations were compared for each item with its own cluster to the item-cluster scores of the other 6 clusters. The criterion for higher correlation with scale of inclusion than with external scales is met as is the criterion for a similar pattern of correlations with external clusters to within sampling error (see Table 3, Appendix A). The final clusters consist of 59 items in eight scales which were labeled Responsiveness to Infant Cues, Dissatisfaction with Parenthood, Maternal Role Definition, Dislike of Early Infancy, Missing Work, Work Problems, Active Coping, and Regret (see Table 5, Appendix A). Standard score coefficient alpha ranges from .61 to .90 (see Table 6, Appendix A). The first scale, responsivity to infant cues, is derived exclusively from the pool of items drawn from the Cohler Maternal. Attitude Scale and has a coefficient alpha estimate of scale reliability of .76. It taps attitudes of attentiveness to infant cues and responsiveness to infant communication. An example is item 11. The six month old baby can tell you exactly what he wants if you watch and listen. The second scale is labeled dissatisfaction with parenthood and is the largest scale with a standard score coefficient alpha of .90. It is typified by items such as " Taking care of a baby is much more work than pleasure" and "I've been nervous and jumpy since having this baby" and "most men have more interesting work to do than their wives have". The third scale is titled Maternal Role Definition and consists of items from the maternal attitude scale and the PARI. This is a three item scale with coefficient alpha of .79 which taps attitudes of strong 58 identification with the mothering role and is believed to reflect traditional female role values such as "A woman does not find her true self until she is a mother". The fourth is a two-item scale derived from the Maternal Attitude Scale and is titled Dislike of Early Infancy. It reflects a perception of the early infancy period as difficult with anticipation of conditions improving as the infant gets older and it has a coefficient alpha of .71. The scale items are "Babies are more difficult to take care of when they are young than when they are older" and "Taking care of babies is hard but I know it will get easier when the baby gets older". Both the fifth and sixth scales are subsets of the predicted mothering-work role conflict scale. These two scales did not form one homogeneous scale and did not correlate to other scales in a parallel fashion. Consequently, they were divided into two scales. The fifth scale contains attitudes of women who are not working and miss employment. It is labeled the Miss Work Scale, has a coefficient alpha of .61 and consists of items like "I sometimes miss the stimulation and challenge of work while I am at home with the baby". The sixth scale is a three item scale labeled Work Problems and taps the anxiety of women who are concerned about their infants while they are at work: coefficient alpha is .78. A sample item is "I sometimes worry that my child will not be adequately cared for while I am at work". The seventh scale was derived from the pilot study questions and is labeled Active Coping. It taps availability of social support and of activities outside the house: coefficient alpha is .73. Items designed to measure passive coping attitudes such as the belief that no . M a.. in: 59 intervention would be useful did not form a consistent cluster and did not correlate with the active coping cluster and were dropped. The information search coping cluster which was predicted on the basis of the Entwisle and Doering study did not form a cohesive cluster and was dropped. This was designed to identify women who sought advice from others or information in books as a means of coping. Items relating to advice from others did correlate with social support items and were included in the active coping scale. Sample items from the active coping scale are "I get all the emotional support I need from my family" and "I still am involved in at least one activity outside the house." The eighth scale is labeled regret and has a coefficient alpha of .64. Although items were designed from the pilot study to measure attitudes towards the timing of parenthood, their negative valences resulted in a cluster which expresses remorse as a result of some aspect of the timing of parenthood as in "I feel too old to be the mother of an infant" or "I wish I had done more things before becoming a parent". Items with positive valence did not fit in this cluster and did not form an internally consistent cluster of their own. Thus all of the predicted scales were formed with the exception of the timing of parenthood scale. The scope of the coping scale was more limited than was intended. The final scale measures only active forms of coping such as seeking social support and involvement in activities outside the home. Satisfaction with parenthood and adjustment to parenthood were very highly correlated and were merged into one scale. Conflict between work and mothering roles did not correlate with other scales in a parallel fashion and was divided into two scales. The first icrk ud A.‘ Sad; reg f0: SE 51 60 first applies to homemakers who miss the work role and is labeled Miss Work and the second to working women who feel torn between their work and mothering responsibilities and is labeled Work Problems. Three new scales were added based on an examination of the data. These are the Role Definition scale, the Dislike of Early Infancy scale and the Regret scale. The clusters were then submitted to a causal analysis in order to test a model of interrelationships. CausaliAnalygig An exploratory path analysis was undertaken to study the causal relations between the variables measured by the scales. A structural equation or path model was used which is a statistic based on multiple regression. The observed correlations between the clusters were used for input into the path analysis. These were obtained from the PACKAGE cluster analysis program. Since these were computed with communalities on the diagonal, the correlations in the path analysis are corrected for attenuation. This eliminates measurement error due to random sampling error by using estimates of item true scores rather than observed scores for input into the correlation equation. The statistical computer program PACKAGE (Hunter, Gerbing, Cohen, and Nicol, 1980) was used to test the path model. The model that most closely fit the total data set is shown in Figure 1. It includes five of the scales that were derived from the final cluster analysis. Scales relating to work-mothering role conflicts were eliminated from the total sample path model because each was applicable to only a segment of the sample. The Work Problem scale regarding infant-related anxiety while the mother is at work is not applicable to nonworking women while the Miss Work scale was not applicable to working women. 33E . 28! in pr [9—) 61 The Maternal Role Definition scale was eliminated from the path model because of low correlations with the other scales. It was used in the inferential analyses as a means of explicating the path models. The path analysis was conducted with an ordinary least squares solution. Table 7 (Appendix A) shows the observed correlations, correlations predicted by the model and the residual of the observed minus the predicted correlations which constitutes the error component. The sum of the squared deviations of observed minus predicted correlations is .11 and does not significantly differ from zero (Chi square I 5.278, ns). Two socio-demographic variables, maternal age and maternal education and one infant variable labeled infant problems were included as predictors in this path model. Infant problems is a summed scale of infant illness, colic, rashes, feeding and sleeping disturbances. A low score denotes high infant problems while a high score denotes low infant problems. TOTAL SAMPLE PATH MODEL As can be seen in Figure 1, two exogenous variables are included in this model. Exogenous variables exert a causal influence on but are not caused by other variables in the model. The first of these is the infant variable labeled Infant Illness/Irregularity and the second is the maternal variable Mother's Education. The Infant Illness/Irregularity variable was found to be predictive of Dislike of Early Infancy (88.44) which in this model is predictive of Dissatisfaction with Parenthood (88.36). Dissatisfaction with Parenthood is predictive of Regret (8.58). 62 Infant Illness/ Irregularity IV Dislike of Earl Infancy 3 6 Mother's Responsive Dissatisfaction Education 4) ~19 Attitudes - 5- with Toward ‘ Parenthood Infant :19 :27 AL Mother's Outside Regret Age Activities/Support ‘ l Figure 1. Path model for total sample. N=125 Sum of squared deviations of the observed minus predicted correlation = .11. Chi Square = 5.278, ns. 63 Maternal Education is predictive of Responsive Attitudes Toward the Infant (BI-.29). It also mediates the influence of Maternal Age on Responsive Attitudes. The relationship between Mother's Age and Mother's Education (88.50) accounts for the corrected zero order correlation of -.17 between Maternal Age and Responsive Attitudes. Mothers with more advanced education tend to be older and to hold more responsive attitudes towards parenting an infant. Responsive Attitudes is negatively predictive of Dissatisfaction with Parenthood (B-.35) and positively predictive of Active Coping (3-.27). Active Coping has both a direct negative impact on Regret (3=-.31) and an indirect impact through Dissatisfaction as follows. Active Coping is related to Dissatisfaction (B -.31) and Dissatisfaction is related to Regret (B =.58). Thus the predictors of Dissatisfaction with Parenthood and Regret, expressed as remorse concerning the timing of parenthood decision, are mother's responsive attitudes, availability of social support and activities outside the home (Active Coping) and perception of early infancy as difficult. Maternal age has an indirect effect on responsiveness through maternal education which in turn predicts responsive attitudes. Infant characteristics such as illness and irregularity have an indirect effect on Dissatisfaction through the perception of the early infancy period as difficult. Next, the sample was broken down to two subsamples: working women (n-Sl including those on maternity leave) and nonworking women (n-74). This was done for the dual purposes of assessing the impact of mothering-work role conflict on Dissatisfaction with Parenthood and of replicating the path model on the two subsamples. The results of the 64 total path model were cross-validated by applying the model to the worker and nonworker subsamples separately. This latter goal was accomplished to within sampling error. Sampling error increased due to the decreased sample sizes. Each model will be presented separately. Path Model for Working Mothers In order to assess the internal consistency of the 6 scales (excluding Maternal Role Definition and Miss Work), for the working subsample, an a priori cluster analysis was computed. Standard score coefficient alphas were still considered acceptable (see Table 8, Appendix A) and all but one scale was left intact. An exception was made in the case of the Active Coping scale in which items 3 and 5 no longer appeared parallel in pattern of correlation to the other scales. These two items were omitted from the working sample Active Coping scale. The decline in scale alphas for all but the Work Problems scale is predicted by the reduced sample size. The Work Problems scale increased in scale alpha from .78 to .82. This is predicted on the basis of the greater applicability of this scale to the working subsample. Corrected observed interscale correlations (see Table 8a, Appendix A) were used in a path analysis which was based on the total sample path model. Two variables were added. The first is the Work Problems scale that focuses on mother's anxiety over the infant while at work. It was predicted that this scale would impact on Dislike of Early Infancy since it contains items that focus on the difficulties of being the working mother of an infant. It was also predicted that the Work Problems variable, which was believed to be a measure of role conflict, would contribute to Dissatisfaction with Parenthood. The second new variable is Method of Infant Feeding. 65 Mothers who had indicated that their infants were breast-fed were assigned a score of '1', those who used a combination of breast and bottle feeding were assigned a score of '2' and those who bottle fed their infants were assigned a score of '3'. The Method of Infant Feeding variable was added after it was observed to correlate highly with Dislike of Early Infancy and Dissatisfaction with Parenthood in the working subsample. The path model is presented in figure 2 and the actual, predicted, and observed minus predicted correlations appear in Table 9 (Appendix A). Although the general path model fits the data to within sampling error (error-.25, Chi square=4.712) some relationships emerged differently for the workers. Responsive Attitudes continued to predict Active Coping (B 8.39) and Active Coping continued to negatively predict Dissatisfaction with Parenthood ( B=-.72) and Regret 8-.72). However, these latter two relationships were more than twice as strong for the working mothers as for the total sample. On the other hand, in this group, Responsive Attitudes did not predict Dissatisfaction with Parenthood above a zero level (3:.02) as opposed to a moderate prediction in the total sample (B=-.35). Moreover, the relationship between Dislike of Early Infancy and Dissatisfaction with Parenthood which emerged in the total sample path model was entirely explained by the Infant Feeding variable. Thus the direct relationship between Dislike of Early Infancy and Dissatisfaction with Parenthood in the total sample appears to be a spurious one and actually is the result of shared correlations with the exogenous variable Infant Feeding. 66 Infant Illness/ Irregularity a? Dislike of ‘ Early Infancy A 0 I/ Mother's Education 13 Q: Work — Mbthering Method of Role Conflict Feeding 0. Infant ’7 .2 q Responsive Dissatisfaction Attitudes with Toward Parenthood Infant Outside Regret Activities/ SUpport -I:. ' i ’l‘ Figure 2. Path model for working mother sample. N=51. Sum of squared deviations of the observed minus predicted correlations = .25. Chi square = 4.712, ns. 67 There continued to be a strong relationship between Infant Illness/Regularity and Dislike of Early Infancy. Working mothers whose infants have been sick, or are irregular experience early infancy as difficult (8=.46) though they are not more dissatisfied with parenthood (B=-.01). A variable which does predict to Dissatisfaction with Parenthood is feeding methods. Working mothers who breast-feed their babies are more likely to experience early infancy as difficult (B=.43) and to be dissatisfied with parenthood (83.28). However, they are also less likely to express regret relative to the timing of parenthood (B =-.29). A low score on the feeding variable indicates breast-feeding.A low score on the Dislike of Infancy, Dissatisfaction with Parenthood and Regret scales indicate strong agreement with these scales. The Mothering-Work role conflict variable did not operate as expected. Contrary to what had been predicted, women who worry about their infants while they are at work (score high on the Work Problems scale) are not more dissatisfied with parenthood (BB-.09) and they are not more likely to experience early infancy as difficult (8-0). The strong relationship between Responsive Attitudes and Work Problems in this sample (33.40) may help explain this result. It is hypothesized that the working women who experience work problems may blame work for the feelings of anxiety generated by separation from the infant. They therefore do not experience dissatisfaction with the mothering role. Their feelings regarding the work role is unknown. Mother's Education continues to be central in this model. Despite a zero order correlation of -.69, there is no causal predictor from Mother's Education to Responsive Attitudes (BB-.07). Rather, both responsiveness and maternal education independently are predictors of 68 the two variables Dislike of Early Infancy Period and Work Problems. However, they operate in reverse direction. A high education level predicts the perception of early infancy as not difficult (B-.40) whereas high responsive attitudes predict the perception of infancy as difficult (B-.29). In addition, mother's high education level predicts low work-mothering conflict (s=.25) whereas responsive attitudes predict high conflict level (3:.40). The relationship between Responsive Attitudes and mothering work role conflict is understood in terms of the greater anxiety responsive mothers have in separation from infants while at work. The relationship between responsivity and perception of infancy as difficult is understood in terms of the greater effort required of mothers who take their caretaking cues from the infant. The negative relationship between Mothers' Education and Work Problems may be indicative of highly educated women's commitment to their work roles. These women may experience less ambivalence in separation from the infant. The negative relationship between education and perception of infancy as difficult is unclear, but may be mediated by a variable not included in the equation. To summarize the path model for working women, Responsive Attitudes Towards Infants is predictive of high Active Coping (8-.39). It has a direct negative impact on Regret Q3--.12) and an indirect impact through Active Coping (EP'-72)- In this model, Responsive Attitudes is not negatively predictive of Dissatisfaction with .Parenthood (EFoOZ) and is not related directly to Maternal Education ( 8 "-.07). However, Responsive Attitudes Towards Infant is predictive of anothering-work role conflict (88.40) and of perception of early infancy 69 as difficult (88.29). Mother's high level education predicts low level Work Problems (88.25) and low level perception of infancy as hard (8 8.40). Although infant health and regularity problems predicts perception of infancy as difficult (38.46), it does not predict dissatisfaction with parenthood (88-.01). The variable that predicts both dissatisfaction with parenthood and dislike of early infancy is Method of Infant Feeding. In working women, breast feeding is related to high levels of parenting dissatisfaction (38.28) and to perception of infancy as hard (88.43). Regret with the timing of parenthood decision is most highly predicted by the absence of Active Coping both directly (BB-.72) and indirectly through Dissatisfaction with Parenthood (88.09). It is believed that the large Beta weight between Active Coping and Dissatisfaction (Eh-.72) is inflated by sampling error and that the actual relationship is somewhat weaker. If this is the case, the small Beta weight between Dissatisfaction and Regret (3 8.09) is probably an underestimate. This is posited based on the relatively large zero order correlation between the two variables Dissatisfaction with Parenthood and Regret (r8.53) and the large path coefficient in the total sample model (88.58). The path model for the subsample of nonworking women is presented in the next section. Non-WorkingpMothers Path Model An a priori cluster analysis of the six clusters used in this model (excluding Work Problems and Maternal Role Definition) was performed. Scale alphas did not significantly deviate from those of the total sample (see Table 10, Appendix A). 70 As in the previous case, the path model for the subsample of nonworking mothers (n874) is based on the model for the total sample. Infant feeding method was not a predictor in this sample and was not included as an exogenous variable. The scale labeled Miss Work which taps mother's attitudes of missing some aspect of the work experience while she is at home with the infant is included as a measure of mothering-work role conflict. The path model appears in figure 3 and the observed, predicted, and observed minus predicted correlations appear in table 11 (Appendix A). The sum of squared deviations is .20 (Chi square85.079, ns) As in the total sample model, Responsive Attitudes Towards the Infant negatively predicts Dissatisfaction with Parenthood both directly (BB-.20) and indirectly through Active Coping. In this model, it also exerts an indirect influence through Miss Work. Responsive infant attitudes predict Active Coping (£8.35) which in turn predicts dissatisfaction with parenthood (88-.31). As in the total sample model, Dissatisfaction with Parenthood strongly predicts regret of the timing of parenthood decision (8=.79). As in the working mother model, both mother's high education level (88-.28) and responsivity to infant (88-.25) predict mothering-work role conflict. Mothers who score highly on the education variable miss the work experience 9952 than mothers who score lower. However, mothers who are highly responsive miss the work.experience lggg than mothers who score lower on responsivity. This is believed to be an expression of the infant-oriented attitudes of women who are responsive to their infants' cues. The Miss Work variable is highly predictive of lDissatisfaction with Parenthood (88.61). 71 Infant Illness/ Irregularity 'eh Dislike of Early Infancy ('3 o1 A Mother's Education "’9 5 9,. 6 Missing U Work ‘4 ’r I Responsive Dissatisfaction Y Attitudes - 3.0 7 with Toward Parenthood Infant “R ’15 Outside Regret Activities/ Support 9.8 Figure 3. Path model for nonworking sample. N—74. Sum of squared deviations of the observed minus predicted correlations = .20. Chi square 8 5.079, ns. 72 In summary, mothering-work role conflict appears to act as a mediating variable between education and responsive attitudes towards infant in the total sample model. In the case of the nonwworking mothers, mothers with high education and thus strong preparation for the work role, miss work more when they are home (88-.28). On the other hand, mothers with responsive, infant-oriented attitudes miss work less when they are home (88-.25). But high levels of responsive infant-oriented attitudes are associated with high levels of conflict while at work (88.40). The infant illness/regularity variable is more central in the nonworking mothers model than in the working mother model. As is true in the working mother model, nonworking mothers whose infant are problematic view early infancy as hard (88.45). But, whereas infant problems in the working mothers model did not predict dissatisfaction with motherhood (88-.01), they do in the nonworking mother model (B 8.37). Miss Work is also predictive of perception of infancy as hard (3 =.65). The relationships between the independent variables mothering-work role conflict, infant illness and method of feeding the infant and the dependent variables Dislike of Early Infancy and Dissatisfaction with Parenthood in the working and nonworking mother subsamples is clarified in the path models presented below. A Comparison of Working and Nonworkigg Mother Models Because of the complexity of Figures 2 and 3, important relationships which differ for working and nonworking mothers are presented separately in order to highlight significant discrepancies. 73 In the nonworking mother model, infant illness and mothering-work role conflict predict both dependent variables Dissatisfaction with Parenthood and Dislike of Early Infancy. Infant Feeding is not a predictor variable but rather a consequence of some variable related to Dissatisfaction with Parenthood (see Figure 4) (See Table 12, Appendix A). In the working mother model, work-mothering conflict mildly predicts Dissatisfaction with Parenthood but not Dislike of Early Infancy. Infant Illness/Irregularity predicts Dislike of Early Infancy but not Dissatisfaction. The variable that most strongly predicts both dependent variables is Method of Infant Feeding (See Figure 5) (See Table 13, Appendix A). As can be seen in both path models, the relationship between Dissatisfaction with Parenthood and disenchantment with early infancy that emerges in the total sample model is spurious. In nonworking mothers, this relationship is best explained by infant problems and role conflict. In the working sample, it is best explained by method of feeding the infant. In the next section, a priori predictions regarding relationships between variables will be explored. In addition, the results of the path analysis suggested several relationships which had not been predicted before data collection. These were also examined. Hypotheses that were predicted a priori are discussed first and those that were generated by the computed path models are discussed second. A priori Predictions Analyses of variance were performed to test the hypotheses that proposed maternal age as an independent variable and responsive attitudes, dissatisfaction with parenthood, active coping, and :mothering-work role conflict as dependent variables. These will be 74 Infant Illness/ 1 ‘/6 i Dislike of Irregularity J Early Infancy 9 9 GE> Method of Feeding Infant Missing I \l Dissatisfaction Work 55— with l [l Parenthood Figure 4. Path model for nonworking mothers. N=74. Sum of squared deviations of the observed minus predicted correlations = .03. Chi square = .882, ns. 75 Infant Illness/ 17,3 Irregularity Dislike of 3% Early Infancy U\ \P\ Method of Feeding Infant \ ’9 Work - Mothering / Role Conflict 6. Dissatisfaction with Parenthood Figure 5. Path model for working mothers. N=51. Sum of squared deviations of the observed minus predicted correlations = .01. Chi square = .046, ns. 76 discussed in the section that follows. Maternal Variables Although the sample was originally divided into four groups from ages 19 to 40, a comparison of group means of the dependent variables did not differ between groups of mothers aged 19-24 and those aged 25-29 and they were collapsed. The means for the groups aged 30-34 and 35-40 were also statistically the same and these too were collapsed. This was done in order to obtain larger cell sizes for all further comparisons. Therefore, all analyses with the maternal age variable were performed on two groups unless otherwise indicated. The first group is aged under 30 and the second is aged 30 and over. Five hypotheses had been proposed with maternal age as the independent variable. To test these, one way analyses of variance with simple effects were performed using the statistical package BMDP4V. Results of these follow. Hypothesis 1. Older women will be more responsive to their infants and will be more satisfied with the parental role. There were no significant differences in responsiveness to infant when mother's age was divided at 30. However, Levinson postulates that a transition occurs in males at approximately age 28, and that this transition takes place over the course of a 5-year structure changing period from age 28-33. In order to see whether a similar shift occurs in women which is evidenced by increasing responsivity to others, an age split was performed dividing the sample into three groups aged 19-27, 28-32, and 33-40. The first group was presumed pre-transitional, the second transitional and the third post transitional. The F value was not significant (F (2,122)8 2.553, pi< 77 .08), but a comparison of group means illustrates that a nonsignificant shift to higher responsive attitudes does occur after age 32 (See Table 14, Appendix A). No age differences were found for dissatisfaction with parenthood (F (2,122) - .73 ns). Hypothesisyg; It was predicted that older mothers would score higher on measures of active coping. This hypothesis was not supported by the data. In fact, mothers under age 30 achieved higher active coping scores than those 30 or over (F (1,119) - 9.68: p<.002). (See Table 15, Appendix A). The Active Coping scale loaded heavily on availability of social support. Older mothers are more often geographically mobile and tend to live apart from families and childhood friends. Younger mothers tend to live closer to their families and long-standing acquaintances and are more reliant than older mothers on their families (Hoffman, 1978: Daniels and Weingarten, 1982). Older mothers may also have less access toother mothers at the same stage of the family life cycle since childbearing age is more staggered in their friends and colleagues than among those of younger mothers. Hypothesis 3. It was predicted that mothers with more effective coping facilities would score lower on measures of dissatisfaction with parenthood. To test this hypothesis, a median split was performed on the Active Coping scale which served as the independent variable. When a one way analysis of variance was performed with the dependent variable Dissatisfaction with Parenthood, significant differences were found (F (1,123) 8 14.384; p‘<0002). Mothers who scored lower on measures of 78 active coping scored higher on measures of dissatisfaction. (See Table 16, Appendix A). Hypothesis 4. It was predicted that mothers who experience higher levels of mothering-work role conflict would report lower levels of satisfaction with parenthood. To test this hypothesis, the sample was divided into working and nonworking subsamples and a median split was performed on the scales Miss Work and Work Problems. One way analyses of variance were performed for each subsample. The independent variable was mothering-work role conflict and the dependent variable was Dissatisfaction with Parenthood. For the non-working mothers, a significant relationship was found between level of mothering-work role conflict and dissatisfaction with parenthood. Mothers who scored higher on the Miss Work scale scored higher on the Dissatisfaction with Parenthood scale (F (1,72) 8 13.577: p<.004). They also scored higher on the Dislike of Early Infancy scale (F (1,72) 8 5.084: p<.02). (See Table 17, Appendix A). For the working sample, there was no significant relationship between Work Problems and Dissatisfactin with Parenthood (F (1,48) 8 .255, ns) or Dislike of Early Infancy (F (1,48) 8 1.712, ns). (See Table 17, Appendix A). Hypothesis 5. It was predicted that older mothers would experience higher levels of role conflict than younger mothers. No such relationship was found (Non-workers: F(1,72)8.061 ns). Workers: F (3,36) 8 .43: ns). (See Table 17a, Appendix A). A postiori Predictions An examination of the path models suggested further exploration of the relationships between the scales and maternal and infant 79 variables. Multivariate analysis of variance was performed with the statistical package BMDP4V. The following maternal variables were considered as independent variables: age, work status, feeding method, socio-economic status (defined as a composite score of husband's education and family income), mother's education, duration of marriage and duration of postponement of childbearing. Infant variables were age, illness/irregularity and sex. Scales which constituted the composite dependent variable were Responsive Attitudes, Dissatisfaction with Parenthood, Dislike of Early Infancy, Active Coping and Regret. Nonsignificant differences which are of interest will be discussed first. Infant Variables No differences were found for infant sex (Manova: F (5,117) 8 .97: ns) or age (Manova: F (3,118) 8.78; ns). In addition, no differences were found between mothers of healthy/regular infants and mothers of sick/irregular infants although the relationship between Dislike of Early Infancy and infant illness/irregularity approached significance (F (1,121) 8 2.91; p6 yrs-16 yrs Mother's Education High school Some college BA Postgraduate Father's Education Elementary school High School Some college BA Postgraduate Income (10,000 10,000-16,000 >16,000-20,000 >20,000-30,000 >30,000 Race White Black Oriental Maternal Work Status Not working Brief maternity leave Working Full-time Part-time Unknown Frequency 121 74 ll 40 25 24 Mean 28 30 4 yrs 20,000-30,000 SD 3.9 2.8 yrs Table 1 (continued) Method of Feeding Infant Breast Bottle Combination Breast and Bottle Postponed Childbearing Yes No ‘ yrs Years Postponed -5 yrs Frequency 67 32 26 66 59 30 24 12 Mean SD Baby's Age in Weeks <3 months >3 months Baby's Sex Male Female Birth Weight in Grams Infant Problems Illness Colic Rashes Feeding problems Sleeping problems 130 TABLE 2 CHARACTERISTICS OF INFANTS Frequency 83 42 63 62 14 11 ~- 24 13 13 Mean 12 3283 SD 8.0 486 131 TAEL 3 {'1 FACTOR INTERCORRELATIONS AND LOADING MATRIX: COMMUNALITY IN THE DIAGONAL Scale 1: Responsiveness to Infant 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 60 -33 10 8 -15 -4 22 -33 2 59 -22 12 0 -15 18 19 -12 3 56 -23 -1 -4 -1 0 15 -27 4 53 -14 -1 14 19 18 16 -11 5 52 -16 -7 -5 2 l8 0 -1 6 50 -13 0 5 -2l 9 4 -4 7 49 -10 -2 6 4 10 16 -23 8 43 -21 -14 1 21 ~2 23 -25 9 38 -16 9 2 11 8 23 -16 10 37 -10 ~7 3 4 23 8 -10 11 30 ~31 15 5 -6 l3 9 -14 12 29 -21 2 0 9 10 22 0 Scale 2: Dissatisfaction with Parenthood 1 -30 67 -6 32 24 5 -34 43 2 -8 65 17 31 20 17 -33 66 3 -28 64 0 15 l 31 -37 40 4 -45 63 0 27 24 6 -31 .54 5 -21 62 19 32 2 25 -41 41 6 -30 62 ll 34 -7 14 -52 60 7 -43 61 3 13 2 15 -23 40 8 -21 59 14 16 8 27 -38 46 9 -12 59 9 42 18 13 -16 43 10 -41 58 -22 6 16 -13 -31 31 11 -30 58 4 24 2 8 -53 48 12 -24 53 1 8 14 -2 -25 25 13 -22 53 -l 34 25 5 -21 47 14 -31 50 -12 5 16 -6 -30 38 15 -13 49 4 19 14 21 -35 27 16 -17 48 -28 14 39 2 -4 27 17 -40 47 -28 -1 8 -10 -17 21 18 ~34 47 -3 16 4 -5 -35 26 19 -21 45 -7 9 11 -11 -10 22 20 -9 43 28 26 -2 6 -16 4 21 1 35 -6 0 33 18 8 17 22 13 34 6 14 28 9 -6 32 23 10 31 l 18 15 32 -11 25 24 -17 31 -13 5 14 -l -23 19 132 Table 3 (continued? Scale 3: Maternal Role Definition 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 -6 2 83 4 -10 5 6 21 2 -1 1 77 7 -24 6 -4 15 3 13 -5 6 8 -31 13 -5 25 Scale 4: Dislike of Early Infancy 1 4 26 3 75 12 1 -4 12 2 5 27 9 75 12 15 -2 1" Scale 5: Missing Work 1 -7 23 -17 12 62 -22 -8 25 2 16 -8 -5 -8 50 0 23 1 3 -19 23 -5 4 47 -25 5 32 4 10 21 -9 11 43 -1C 8 22 5 5 5 -34 21 41 -19 18 - Scale 6: Work Problems 1 15 19 10 1 -21 91 -10 18 2 0 14 4 6 -20 78 -10 .17 3 34 4 11 18 -29 57 -1s '17 Scale 7: Active Coping 1 5 -18 -3 4 2 -18 63 -4O 2 25 -24 0 -7 4 1 56 -39 3 23 -18 0 -5 l9 5 52 -15 4 -5 ~27 4 ~2 ~10 ~2 52 ~29 5 10 -23 -4 -31 28 ~16 52 -24 6 36 -12 -11 2 ll -15 44 -29 7 -3 -27 -2 5 5 -20 40 -34 8 20 -8 13 l 32 11 40 -14 9 5 -24 7 17 8 -7 36 -16 10 34 -50 -9 0 -9 -13 31 -53 Scale 8: Regret 1 -10 23 18 1 25 5 -20 50 2 -15 34 36 26 22 6 -23 49 3 -29 39 9 27 32 -5 -13 49 4 l 27 -8 10 25 17 -30 47 5 -15 29 -3 6 15 15 ~47 41 6 -27 37 25 -5 -10 7 -36 39 7 -17 39 18 2 2 18 -32 38 8 4 13 -3 -2 24 15 -13 30 Scale 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Scale 2: 1 1 100 2 -5 3 -11 4 -4 5 5 6 14 7 -8 8 11 9 -6 10 15 11 14 12 -16 l3 -l3 14 14 15 8 l6 -4 l7 17 18 -10 1 100 -32 -16 -26 -10 77 ~6 30 q -2 7‘s) TABLE 4 ITEM CORRELATION MATRIX COMPUTED WITH ONES ON THE DIAGONAL AND WITH CLUSTER SCORES PARTIALED OCT 3 9 -10 100 -28 I 29 17 8 -8 -12 -7 b 4 : Responsiveness to Infant 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 6 -16 -26 -10 22 -6 3O 29 ll -34 13 32 -1 26 -28 7 29 17 8 -8 -12 100 7 28 -14 -17 -11 -14 7 100 18 ~14 -12 5 -4 28 18 100 -4 23 2 21 -14 -1z. -4 100 2 6 9 ~17 ~12 23 2 100 10 —29 -11 S 2 6 10 100 2 -14 -4 21 9 -29 2 100 21 2 8 -8 -7 -1O 11 22 8 -1C 10 6 11 -1S Dissatisfaction with Parenthood 2 -5 100 16 5 5 27 9 -19 100 21 -1 13 -24 21 -4 -6 45 -17 -6 -12 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 -8 11 -6 15 14 -16 -13 -24 O -20 15 11 27 39 7 18 3 13 11 8 4 28 l -7 -2 21 4 -1 13 -24 21 -4 -6 100 -24 -6 12 23 -5 23 5 ~24 100 -18 14 2 4 l8 6 -6 -18 100 -13 -6 -18 -21 17 12 14 -13 100 -5 -3 28 10 23 2 -6 -5 100 6 -3 -5 -5 4 -18 -3 6 100 2 -11 23 18 -21 28 -3 2 100 20 5 6 17 10 -5 -11 20 100 -8 16 -6 -12 10 -10 -16 1 30 ~6 1 22 ~21 9 -21 -2 11 8 7 18 -3 9 4 l4 ~4 -13 -9 2 8 l9 -6 2 7 1 -2 -9 ~12 -4 8 -3 14 14 -15 34 -5 -8 l6 -6 -12 -10 -16 100 -5 -8 10 13 11 34 -18 -7 b 21 -8 ~7 -10 100 -12 -12 100 100 Table 4 (continued) ) J an 19 2C 2; 2- -3 1 -3 -3 -13 -4 ~2 2 -12 -65 1 ~38 14 3 -3 14 -14 5 -2 4 -5 2 ll 15 1 5 -10 19 -17 ~l -16 6 -9 ~53 15 ~2 ~14 7 7 ~27 l -5 0 8 ~7 36 22 4 27 9 8 -41 9 ~20 -2 10 -8 8 -5 1 -2 11 -13 3O -10 -S -1 12 2 40 0 3 -14 13 -13 14 2 ~7 -1 14 -7 4 -11 ~7 ~10 15 3 24 ~18 1 -9 16 9 13 -4 ~7 33 17 -14 ~2 -S 18 -2 18 17 29 ~13 37 -6 19 100 ~1 16 9 22 20 -l 100 53 4 -3 21 16 53 100 ~8 11 22 9 4 -8 100 2 23 22 -3 11 2 100 24 14 17 19 12 ~10 Scale 3: Dislike of Infancy 1 2 l 100 -2 2 -2 100 Scale 4: Missing Work 1 2 3 4 1 100 16 26 0 2 16 100 -3 16 3 26 -3 100 -9 4 0 16 -9 100 Scale 5: Work Problems 1 2 3 l 100 -3 28 2 -3 100 15 3 28 15 100 Table 4 (continued) Scale 6: Active Coping \OGJxlO‘th-th-J Scale 7: Regret (D‘lO‘UibLAJliH 1 100 16 23 -10 -6 -9 -1 - -4 2 16 100 31 5 -10 -8 -12 -12 3 '7 h 10 100 21 -19 -12 7 -3 -l l. 21 100 -1 -9 -2 10 -7 -4 100 -8 -13 21 -2 18 -19 -l 100 34 -11 -6 -10 -20 100 17 15 19 -12 -9 34 100 -14 -9 -8 -2 -8 100 7‘) 5‘- 10 135 ‘1 13 -8 -7 -14 100 -1 \J -1 -12 10 -13 100 -3 -10 16 -3 10 10 100 14 -1 -7 h -11 -1 100 FINAL SCALES DERIVED FROM THE A PRIORI CLUSTER ANALYSIS Scale 1: Responsiveness to Infant Alpha 8 .77 1. A three month old baby can't really tell you what he is thinking by a smile. 2. Parents should ignore their child's crying when it is just for attention. 3. Most of the time small babies don't even understand it when their mothers smile at them. R4 Holding and caressing a baby when he cries is good for him. R5 A seven month old infant should be picked up when he cries. 6. In deciding when a baby is really ready to give up the bottle, a mother's judgement should be more important than what the baby seems to want. 7. Babies need love and attention, but not nearly as much as most mothers give them. 8. Babies wish that their mothers would stop fussing over them too much. 9. Parents often overestimate the importance of encouraging children's curiosity about the world around them. 10. If a mother plays very much with her seven month old baby, he will want her to be around all the time. R11. The six month old baby can tell you exactly what he wants if you watch and listen. R 12. A child should be fed when he is hungry. Scale 2: Dissatisfaction with Parenthood Alpha 8 .90 1. Having a baby has not been as enjoyable as I expected it to be. R2 Overall, how would you rate the degree of difficulty you've had in adjusting to this baby? R3 I enjoy the responsibility of being a mother. 4. Taking care of a baby is much more work than pleasure. 5. Compared to most mothers I am having a much harder time. 6. I've been nervous and jumpy since having this baby. Table 5 (continued) Scale 2 7. Sometimes I wonder if all the bad times are worth it. 8. I find it hard to be patient with my child. 9. Being a mother is much harder than I expected. E10. Being a mother is much more rewarding than I expected. 11. On the whole, I'm satisfied with myself. 12. Sometimes I feel like I'm home alone too often. 13. Taking care of the baby leaves me on edge and tense. 14. If I had known what it was like, I doubt I would have had this baby. 15. Compared to most mothers, I am having a much easier time of it. 16. Cleaning, diapering and caring for a baby can get a woman down. 17. The experience of having a baby has made me a happier person. 18. People say I have a good attitude. V 19. The pain of childbirth is so great that a woman sometimes wonders if it's worthwhile. 20. People don't respect me enough for being a mother. 21. A baby's crying gets on your nerves after a while. 22. Most men have more interesting work to do than their wives have. 23. Sometimes it's hard to put the baby's need first. R24. Being able to watch while she gives birth is one of the most thrilling experiences of a mother's life. Scale 3: Maternal Role Definition Alpha 8 .79 1. A woman's life is really not complete unless she has a child. 2. A woman does not find her true self until she is a mother. 3. A mother has more pride in herself than a childless woman. Table 5 (continued.1 Scale 4: Dislike of Early Infancy Alpha 8 .71 1. Taking care of babies is hard but I know it will get easier when the baby gets older. 2. Babies are more difficult to take care of when they are very young than when they are older. Scale 5: Missing Work Alpha 8 .61 1. I sometimes miss the stimulation and challenge of work while I am at home with the baby. to People who don't have time to experience work before starting a family miss out. 3. A woman's personality suffers when she is only involved in keeping house and raising children. 4. I sometimes miss contacts with people at work while I am at home with the baby. R’ Raising children and keeping house are more interesting than the kind of work most men do for a living. . Scale 6: Work Problems Alpha 8 .79 1. I sometimes worry that my child will not be adequately cared for while I am at work. 2. I sometimes worry that the child may be sick or hurt while I am at work. 3. I sometimes think that I may be missing out on maternal pleasures by working. Scale 7: Active Coping Alpha 8 .74 1. Even though time is short, I still make time for some physical exercise. 2. When I have questions about taking care of my baby, I can talk to other mothers about it. 3. When things get rough, I try and talk about them with my husband. 4. I get all the emotional support I need from my family. 5. I see friends at least once a week. 6. I still am involved in at least one activity outside the house. 139 Table 5 (continued) Scale 7 Even though I have little time to myself these days, I know how to take care of my needs. \ D 8. When I feel myself getting down, I try to get out of the house. 9. When I'm not sure about something, I can always call my pediatrician. R10. When things get this bad, nothing you can do will help. Scale 8: Regret Alpha 8 .64 1. If a woman waits too long, she won't have enough energy to have a baby. 2. I'm glad I didn‘t wait any longer to have this baby or I'd be too set in my ways. 3. A woman has a hard time adjusting to motherhood when she's been free for too long. 4. If I'd have waited any longer to have this child, I'd have been too old. 5. I feel too old to be the mother of an infant. 9 - 6. If only - had waited longer to have this baby, my husband and I might agree more on things. 7. I wish I had done more things before becoming a parent. 8. Most mothers are not mature enough when their first child is born. Note: These scales were used in the causal analyses and in all parametric tests. An exception was made in the computation of the ”Active Coping" Scale in the path analysis of the working mother subsample in which items 3 and 5 were omitted due to lack of parallelism. R represents reflected items. \IO‘lflL‘LJ-JIQH C" Scale Responsiveness to Infant STANDARD SCORE COEFFICIENT ALPHAS TABLE 6 TOTAL SAMPLE Dissatisfaction with Parenthood Maternal Role Definition Dislike of Early Infancy Missing Work Work Problems Active Coping Regret l 2 3 100 -41 3 ~41 100 ~1 -1 100 6 35 9 2 26 -29 22 16 11 32 ~49 -1 ~32 71 27 CORRECTED I'TERSCALE CORRELATIONS 6 35 100 11 -4 19 TABLE 6A TOTAL SAMPLE 26 -29 16 100 -31 19 39 32 -49 ~1 -4 19 -16 100 -63 -32 100 141 TABLE 7 PATH ANALYSIS: FULL SAMPLE ORDINARY LEAST SQUARES SOLUTION PATH COEFFICIENTS Infant Maternal Dislike of Maternal Respon- Illness Education Infancy Age siveness Infant illness 0 0 0 0 0 Maternal education 0 0 0 0 0 Dislike of infancy 44 0 0 0 0 Maternal age 0 50 0 0 0 Responsiveness 0 -29 0 0 0 Active coping 0 0 0 0 27 Dissatisfaction O 0 36 0 -35 Regret 0 O 0 0 0 REPRODUCED CORRELATIONS Infant illness 100 11 44 5 -3 Maternal education 11 100 5 50 -29 Dislike of infancy 44 5 100 2 -1 Maternal age 5 50 2 100 -14 Responsiveness -3 -29 -1 -14 100 Active coping -1 ~8 0 ~4 27 Dissatisfaction 17 14 36 7 -44 Regret 10 ll 21 5 -34 OBSERVED MINUS PREDICTED CORRELATIONS Infant illness 0 0 0 -3 l Maternal education 0 0 14 0 0 Dislike of infancy 0 14 0 3 8 Maternal age -3 0 3 0 -3 Responsiveness 1 0 8 -3 0 Active coping -6 ~3 -3 l4 0 Dissatisfaction 3 -1l -2 -7 3 Regret -8 5 -4 -l4 2 Active Dissatis- coping faction -1 -8 -4 27 100 -41 -54 -6 -3 -3 14 0 0 -1 '1 SUM OF SQUARED DEVIATIONS 8 .11 Chi square 8 5.278 ns mOOOOOOO LN 17 14 36 -44 -41 100 71 ~11 -2 ~7 -l Regret -8 -5 -4 I ' H ~1 O‘KflbbeQH C‘kflbbJNk‘ TABLE 10 STANDARD SCORE COEFFICIENT ALPHAS, NON-WORKING SUBSAMPLE Responsiveness to infant .78 Dissatisfaction with parenthood .92 Dislike of infancy .76 Missing work .56 Active coping .71 Regret .66 TABLE 10A CORRECTED INTERSCALE CORRELATIONS, NON-WORKING SUBSAMPLE 1 2 3 4 5 6 100 -49 8 -24 35 -26 ~49 100 36 61 -35 79 8 36 100 47 -l 18 -24 61 47 100 2 66 35 -35 -1 2 100 -28 -26 79 18 66 -28 100 143 TABLE 9 PATH ANALYSIS, ORDINARY LEAST SQUARES SOLUTION WORKING SUBSAMPLE PATH COEFFICIENTS Infant Maternal Infant Respon- Work Active Dissatis- Dislike Regret Illness Education Feeding siveness Problems Coping faction Infancy Infant illness 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O Maternal 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 education Infant feeding O 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 Responsiveness 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Work problems 0 25 0 40 0 0 0 0 0 Active coping 0 0 0 39 ~44 O 0 0 0 Dissatisfaction -1 O 28 2 -9 -72 0 0 0 Dislike infancy 46 40 43 -9 0 0 0 0 O Regret 0 0 -29 -12 0 -72 9 0 0 REPRODUCED CORRELATIONS Infant illness 100 -7 8 2 -1 1 2 47 -3 Maternal ~7 100 21 -69 -3 ~26 24 26 23 education Infant feeding 8 21 100 12 10 O 27 58 -29 Responsiveness 2 -69 12 100 23 29 -18 ' 7 -38 Work problems -1 -3 10 23 100 ~35 19 9 21 Active coping 1 -26 O 29 -35 100 -69 -1 -82 Dissatisfaction 2 24 27 -18 19 -69 100 17 53 Dislike infancy 47 26 58 7 9 -l 17 100 -15 Regret -3 23 -29 -38 21 -82 53 -15 100 OBSERVED MINUS PREDICTED CORRELATIONS Infant illness 0 0 25 -14 7 0 9 Maternal 0 0 0 0 0 -9 -7 0 ~3 education Infant feeding 0 0 0 0 2 ~8 6 0 7 Responsiveness 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Work problems 25 0 2 0 0 O 1 9 3 Active coping -l4 -9 -8 0 0 0 -2 -10 2 Dissatisfaction 7 -7 6 0 1 -2 0 l4 0 Dislike infancy 0 0 0 0 9 -10 14 0 29 Regret 9 -3 7 0 3 2 0 29 0 SUM OF SQUARED DEVIATIONS 8 .25 Chi square 8 4.712 ns 146 TABLE 12 PATH COEFFICIENTS, ORDINARY LEAST SQUARES SOLUTION NON-WORKING SUBSAMPLE PATH COEFFICIENTS Infant Missing Dislike Dissatisfaction Infant Illness Work Infancy Feeding Infant illness 0 0 0 0 0 Missing work 0 0 0 0 0 Dislike infancy 46 52 0 0 0 Dissatisfaction 37 65 0 0 0 Infant feeding 0 0 0 ~28 O REPRODUCED CORRELATIONS Infant illness 100 -11 40 30 -8 Missing work ~11 100 47 61 -17 Dislike infancy 4O 47 100 45 -13 Dissatisfaction 30 61 45 100 -28 Infant feeding -8 -17 ~13 -28 100 OBSERVED MINUS PREDICTED CORRELATIONS Infant illness 0 0 0 0 -1 Missing work 0 0 0 0 13 Dislike infancy 0 0 0 -9 9 Dissatisfaction O 0 -9 0 0 Infant feeding -l 13 9 0 0 SUM OF SQUARED DEVIATIONS 8 .03 Chi square 8 .882 ns Work problems Infant illness Infant feeding Dissatisfaction Dislike infancy Work problems Infant illness Infant feeding Dissatisfaction Dislike infancy Work problems Infant illness Infant feeding Dissatisfaction Dislike infancy 147 TABLE 13 PATH ANALYSIS, ORDINARY LEAST SQUARES SOLUTION WORKING SUBSAMPLE PATH COEFFICIENTS Work Infant Infant Dissatisfaction Dislike Problems Illness Feeding Infancy O 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 C 0 0 0 0 l6 0 31 0 0 O 43 55 0 0 REPRODUCED CORRELATIONS 100 24 12 20 7 24 100 8 6 47 12 8 100 33 58 20 6 33 100 21 17 47 58 21 100 OBSERVED MINUS PREDICTED CORRELATIONS 0 O O 0 1 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 3 0 0 10 1 0 0 10 0 SUM OF SQUARED DEVIATIONS 8 .01 Chi square 8 .046 ns Mean Responsiveness to Infant for 3 Levels of Maternal Age Table 148 Q '7 14 Maternal Age Source (SS) (MS) F(2,1221 P 19-27 28-32 33-40 Between .9811 .4906 2.553 .08 -.1321 2 1598 1.8838 Within 23.4380 .1921 Total 24.4191 Table 15 Mean Active Coping and Maternal Age Mean Mean Source (35) (MS) F(1,119) P Age 19-29 Age 30-40 Between 1.9495 1.9495 9.68 .002 1.922 2.083 Within 23.9682 .2014 Total 25.9177 Table 16 Available Coping Facilities and Mean Dissatisfaction with Parenthood Mean Mean Source (SS) (MS) F(1,123) F Greater Available Lesser Available Between 3.2186 3.2186 14.384 .0002 Coping Coping Within 27.5219 .2238 3.9263 3.5976 Total 30.7405 Note: The Available Coping variable was derived by performing a median split on the Active Coping Scale. Greater Available Coping was defined as scores above the median value. Bork StatusLiRole Conflict and Dissatisfaction With Maternal Role Mean Mean Source (SS) (HS) F High Role Low Role Conflict Conflict Non-Korkers 3.4381 3.8616 Between 3.3184 3.3184 (1.72) 13.577 Dissatisfaction Within 17.5978 .2444 Total 20.9162 Non-Workers Dislike 1nfancy 2.7568 3.2297 Between 4.1385 4.1385 (1.72) 5.084 Within 58.6081 .8140 Total 62.7466 Workers Dissatisfaction 3.8431 3.9021 Between .0433 .0433 (1,48) .255 Within 8.1444 .1697 Total 8.1877 Workers . Dislike Infancy 2.8889 3.2174 Between 1.3403 1.3403 (1,48) 1.712 Within 37.5797 .7829 Total 38.9200 Note: Worker role conflict was derived by performing a median split on the "Work Problems” scale. High role conflict was defined as a score above the median. Nonworker role conflict was derived from a median split of the "Miss Work" scale. High role conflict was defined as a score above the median. Miss Work Work Problems 152 Table 17A Mean Age and Mean Role Conflict Scores Age 19-29 Age 30-40 Source (55) (MS) F P 1.4902 1.5217 Between .0158 .0158 (1,72) .061 R.S. Within 18.4842 .2567 Total 18.5000 (3.36) .43 N.S. Responsiveness Dissatisfaction Dislike Infancy Active Coping Regret Table 18 Mean Scale Scores for Infant Sex Female Male Source (SS) (MS) F(1,12317 P 2.05 2.17 Between .4802 .48020 2.47 N.S Within 23.9470 .1947 Total 24.4272 3.73 3.75 Between .9805 .9805 .04 N.S Within 30.7070 .2496 Total 31.6875 3.02 3.01 Between .2097 .2097 .00 5.5 Within 101.7299 .8271 Total 101.9396 1.94 2.02 Between .2001 .2001 .90 N.S Within 27.3518 .2224 Total 27.5519 3.71 3.67 Between .3842 .3842 .15 ’ N.s. Within 31.5212 .2563 Total 31.9054 Table 18A Mean Scale Scores for Infant Illness/Irrggularitv Present Absent Source (SS) (HS) P(1,121) P Responsiveness 2.085 2.003 Between .3813 .3813 .11 R.S. Within 23.4116 .1935 Total 23.7929 Dissatisfaction 3.865 3.892 Between .2721 .2721 .78 N.S. Within 28.8776 .2387 Total 29.1497 Dislike Infancy 2 929 3 174 Between 1.1321 1.1321 2.91 .09 Within 98.4894 .8140 Total 99.6215 Active Coping 2.017 2.022 Between .7228 .7228 .35 N.S. Within 26.6861 .2205 Total 27.4089 Regret 3.792 3.710 Between .1393 .1393 .02 N.S. Within 30.7074 .2538 ' Total 30.8467 Note: Illness/Irregularity is defined as the presence of one or more of the following conditions: minor illness, rashes, colic or irregularities of sleep or feeding. This is contrasted to the absence of any illness or irregularity. Table 19 Mean Scale Scores for Planned vs. Unplanned Pregnancies 0" Planned Unplanned Source (SS) (MS) Fflll' Responsiveness 2.13 2.04 Between .1148 .1148 .58 Within 24.3124 .1977 Total 24.4272 Dissatisfaction 3.73 3.82 Between .1241 .1241 .50 Within 30.5928 .2487 Total 30.7169 Dislike Infancy 3.04 2.87 Between .4619 .4619 .56 Within 101.2701 .8233 Total 101.7320 Active Coping 1.99 1.92 Between .9113 .9113 .41 Within 27.4608 .2233 Total 28.3721 Regret 3.68 3.77 Between .1201 .1201 .47 Within 31.4395 .2556 Total 31.5596 Table 19A Mean Scale Scores for Duration of Marriage <1 Yr. 1-3 Yrs. >3-6 Yrs. >6 Source (SS) (MS) F(3,113) ’YJ IJ [J [J k) .06 k) .33 1.91 Between .3425 .1142 .61 Within 21.2956 .1885 Total 21.6380 Responsiveness 3 L.) \1 Ln p) U! L b) \ 1 b.) Between .5447 .1816 .70 Within 29.1523 .2580 Total 29.6970 Dissatisfaction 3.80 Dislike Infancy 2.97 3.18 2.73 2.94 Between 2.1216 .7072 .82 Within 96.9903 .8583 Total 99.1119 Active Coping 1.92 1.95 2.09 2.29 Between .7068 .2356 1.05 Within 25.3136 .2240 Total 26.0205 Regret 3 75 3.68 3.55 3.71 Between .3189 .1063 .40 Within 30.3160 .2683 Total 30.6349 (n \J Table 20 Mean Responsiveness to Infant for Infant Age and Maternal Work Status Infant Age Infant Age Source (SS) (MS) F P < 3 Months > 3 Months Workers 2.2053 1.8557 Between 1.5432 1.5432 (1,49) 10.727 .001* Within 7.0492 .1439 Total 8.5924 Non-Workers 2.1530 2.1694 Between .0038 .0038 (1.72) .018 N.S. Within 15.4606 .2147 Total 15.4643 “Student Newman-keuls significant .05 level Table 21 Mean Responsiveness to Infant for Maternal Work Status Workers Non-Workers Source (58) (MS) F(1,123) P 3.6449 3.8762 Between 1.5462 1.5462 6.514 .01* Within 29.1943 .2374 Total 30.7405 ”Student Newman-Keuls significant at .05 level 159 Table 22 Mean Scale Scores for Method of Feeding Infant Breast Feeders Bottle Feeders Source (SS) (MS) F(l,123) F ReSponsiveness 2.0368 2.3327 Between 2.0853 2.0853 11.484 .009“ Within '.3339 .1816 7) Total 24.4191 Dislike Infancy 2.9086 3.3125 Between 3.8839 3.8839 4.882 .C2* Within 97.8481 .7955 Total 101.7320 *Student Newman-Keuls significant at .05 level 160 Table 23 Mean Scale Scores for Maternal Work Status and Method of Feeding Infant Breast Feeders Bottle Feeders Source (SS) (MS) F P Workers 3.8005 4.0974 Between .8540 .8540 (1,49) 5.637 .02 Dissatisfaction Within 7.4241 .1515 Total 8.2781 Non-Workers 3.7199 3.4472 Between 1.0502 .050- (1,72) 3.806 .05 Dissatisfaction Within 19.8660 .2759 Total 20.9162 Workers 2.8158 3.6923 Between 7.4418 4418 (1,49)11.584 .001* Dislike Infancy Within 31.4798 6424 Total 38.9216 Non-Workers 2.9727 3.0526 Between .0902 .0902 (1,72) .104 N.S Dislike Infancy Within 62.6565 8702 Total 62.7466 . *Student Newman-keuls significant at the .05 level 161 Table 24 Mean Responsiveness to Infant for Maternal Work Status, Method of Feeding Infant and Maternal Age Maternal Age Source (SS) (MS) F P 19-29 30-40 Workers: breast 2.0808 1.9010 Between .2992 .2992 (1,36) 2.040 N.S Within 5.2794 .1466 Total 5.5785 bottle 2.1424 2.2197 Between .0184 .0184 (1,11) .074 N.S Within 2.7253 .2478 Total 2.7437 Non-Workers: breast 2.1651 1.8399 Between 1.2806 .2806 (1,53),7.268 .009* Within 9.3392 .1762 ' Total 10.6199 bottle 2.3864 2.6000 Between .1681 .1681 (1,17) 1.102 N.S. Within 2.5945 .1526 Total 2.7627 *Student Newman-Keuls significant at the .05 level 1 62 Table 25 Mean Dissatisfaction with Parenthood for Two Levels of Maternal Age at Two Levels of Work Status for Breast and Bottle Feeding Mothers Maternal Age Source (SS) (MS) F 19-29 30-40 Workers: breast 3.8523 3 7293 Between .1401 1401 (1.36) .936 ’.S. Within 5.3865 1496 Total 5.5265 bottle 3.9282 4.3681 Between .5954 .5954 (1.11) 5.030 .04 Within 1.3021 1184 Total 1.8976 Non-Workers: breast 3.6833 3.7951 Between .1512 .1512 (1,53) .601 '.S. Within 13.3295 .2515 Total 13.4807 ' bottle 3.6724 2.8167 Between 2.6976 2.6976 (1.17) 12.436 .002* Within 3.6877 .2169 Total 6.3853 *Student Newman-Keuls significant at the .05 level 163 Table 26 Mean Responsiveness to Infant for Maternal Education (College Graduate College Graduate Postgraduate Source (SS) (MS) F(2J222) P 2.2157 2.2105 1.9060 Between 2.6016 1.3008 7.274 .001* Within 21.8175 .1788 Total 24.4191 “Student Newman-Keuls significant at the .05 level Table 27 Mean Scale Scores for Postponement of Childbearing Years Postponed 0 <2 Yrs 3-5 Yrs >6 Yrs Source (SS) (MS) F(3,47) F Dissatisfaction 3.8473 3.6780 4.1851* 3.6964 Between 1.9151 .6384 4.715 .005* Within 6.3630 .1354 Total 8.2781 Active Coping 2.0083 2.0707 1.7842** 2.4048 Between 1.7901 .5967 2.335 .08** Within 12.0135 .2556 Total 13.8036 *Student Newman-Keuls significant at .05 level **Least Significant Differences test significant at .05 level v Table 28 Mean Scale Scores for Percentage of lime Worked "5 Full Time Part Time Source (SS) (MS) F P Work Problems 2.1667 2.8841 Between 6.1651 6.1651 (1,46) 6.017 .01* Within 47.1353 1.0247 Total 53.3003 Active Coping 2.1822 1.8426 Between 1.4124 1 4124 (1,47) 5.469 .02* Within 12.1373 2582 Total 13.5498 *Student Newman-Reuls significant at the .05 level M Means and Standards Deviations for Background Variables and Maternal Age Maternal Age 19-29 SD 30-40 SD Source (55) (MS) F(1,122 P Duration of 1.519 .69 2.186 1.08 Between 12.5161 12.5161 17.61 .0001 Marriage Within 86.7339 .7109 Total 99.2500 Education 1.753 .80 2.349 75 Between 9.9692 9.9692 16.25 .01 Within 74.8292 .6134 Total 84.8261 585 1.901 .82 2.302 .74 Between 4.5187 4.5187 7.23 .008 Within 76.2796 .6252 Total 80.7983 Yrs. Childbearing 1.543 .58 2.512 1.03 Between 26.3425 26.3425 35.38 .00001 Postponed Within 90.8429 .7446 Total 117.1854 Planned Pregnancy 1.210 .17 1.047 .21 Between .7496 .7496 5.96 .01 Within 15.3391 .1257 Total 16.0887 Infant Age 1.247 .43 1.512 .51 Between 1.9683 1.9683 9.31 .002 Within 25.8059 .2115 Total 27.7742 Infant Feeding 1.272 .45 1.233 .43 Between .4283 .4283 .22 N.S Within 23.6991 .1943 Total 24.1274 Infant Illness/ 1.506 .50 1.558 .50 Between .7585 7585 .30 N.S Irregularity Within 30.8516 2529 Total 31.6101 Work Status 1.630 .49 1.512 .51 Between .3911 3911 1.61 N.S Within .2429 0020 Total .6341 Note: Duration of Marriage: 1-<2 years 2-3-4 years 385-6 years 4->6 years Education: 1-some college 2-college graduate 3-postgraduate SES: l-low 2-medium 3=high Based on current sample means Years Postponed Childbearing: If: year 2-2-3 years 3-4-6 years 4=>6 years Planned Pregnancy: ltyes 2-no Infant Age: 1353 months 2->3 months Infant Feeding: l-breast 2-bott1e Infant Illness/Irregularity: l-yes 2=no Work Status: l-working 2-not working Mean Traditional Feminine Role Identification Scores for Different Levels of Maternal Age in Bottle Feeding Mothers Maternal Age Source (SS) (MS) F P 19-29 30-40 Workers 3.1667 4.1333 Between 2.8752 2.8752 (1.11) 5.559 .03 Within 5.6889 .5172 Total 8.5641 NoneWorkers 3.1905 3.4000 Between .1617 .1617 (1.17) .140 5.5. Within 19.5810 1.1518 Total 19.7427 Maternal Age Source (SS) (MS) F(1,30) P (33 >33 3.2 4.0 Between 1.3366 1.3366 1.451 E.S. Within 27.6322 .9211 . Total 28.9687 Maternal Age Source (55) (MS) F(l,30) P <28 >28 2.9167 3.6333 Between 3.8521 3.8521 4.601 .04* Within 25.1167 .8372 Total 28.9687 *Student Newman-Keuls significant at the .05 level 168 Table 31 Mean Dissatisfaction with Parenthood for Two Levels of Maternal Age at Two Levels of Work Status and Two Levels of Responsiveness to Infant Workers: Greater Responsiveness Lesser Responsiveness Non-Workers: Greater Responsiveness Lesser Responsiveness Maternal Age Source (SS) (MS) F(7,117) P 19-29 30-40 3.9059 3.9055 Between 4.4854 .6408 2.855 .008* Within 26.2551 .2244 3.8225 3.8755 3.5644 Total 30.7405 3.8492 3.8322 3.3098* *Student Newman-Keuls significant at .05 level Note: The ”Responsiveness Towards Infant" variable was derived on the Responsiveness scale. by performing a median split A score of 1 denotes a value above the median, 2 denotes a value below the median. 169 Table 32 Mean Dissatisfaction with Parenthood for Two Levels of Maternal Work Status and Two Levels of Traditional Role Identification Maternal Work Status Workers Non-Workers Source (SS) (MS) F(3,121) P Greater Traditional 3.9645* 3.7135 Between 2.3454 .7818 3.332 .02 Role Identification Within 28.3951 .2347 Total 30.7405 Lesser Traditional 3.8144 3.5392* Role Identification *Student Newman-Keuls significant at .05 level Note: "Traditional Role Identification" was derived by performing a median split on the ”Maternal Role Definition" Scale. A lower score denotes stronger identification with traditional feminine values. APPENDIX B 1) 2) 3) 4) 5) 6) 7) 8) 9) 170 QUESTIONNAIRE Holding and caressing a baby when he cries is good for him. (strongly agree undecided disagree strongly) agree disagree A woman's personality suffers when she is only involved in keeping house and raising children. (strongly agree undecided disagree strongly) agree disagree Sometimes I feel like I'm home alone too often. (strongly agree undecided disagree strongly) agree disagree If I had had this baby earlier, I might not have appreciated him as much as I do now. (strongly agree undecided disagree strongly) agree disagree When I'm unsure about what to do, I try to find the answers in childcare books. (strongly agree undecided disagree strongly) agree disagree Being a mother is much harder than I expected. (strongly agree undecided disagree strongly) agree disagree A newborn baby doesn't cry unless something is wrong. (strongly agree undecided disagree strongly) agree disagree A woman does not find her true self until she is a mother. (strongly agree undecided disagree strongly) agree disagree Sometimes I wonder if all the bad times are worth it. (strongly agree undecided disagree strongly) agree disagree 1o) 11) 12) 13) 14) 15) 16) 17) 171 If only I had waited longer to have this baby my husband and I might agree more on things. (strongly agree undecided disagree strongly) agree disagree Taking care of babies is hard but I know it will get easier when the baby gets older. (strongly agree undecided disagree strongly) agree disagree Being a mother is much more rewarding than I expected. (strongly agree undecided disagree strongly) agree disagree Babies wish that their mothers would stop fussing over them too much. (strongly agree undecided disagree strongly) agree disagree Raising children and keeping house is more interesting than the kind of work most men do for a living. (strongly agree undecided disagree strongly) agree disagree Having a baby has not been as enjoyable as I expected it to be. (strongly agree undecided disagree strongly) agree disagree I am the only one of my friends with a child in diapers. (strongly agree undecided disagree strongly) agree disagree Since I've had this baby I eat more than I should. (strongly agree undecided disagree strongly) agree disagree 172 18) Cleaning, diapering and caring for a baby can get a woman down. (strongly agree undecided disagree strongly) agree disagree 19) Parents often over-estimate the importance of encouraging children's curiosity about the world around them. (strongly agree undecided disagree strongly) agree disagree 20) I sometimes miss the stimulation and challenge of work while I am at home with the baby. (strongly agree undecided disagree strongly) agree disagree 21) On the whole, I'm satisfied with myself. (strongly agree undecided disagree strongly) agree disagree 22) When a couple waits too long to have a baby, they may resent the baby for coming between them. (strongly agree undecided disagree strongly) agree disagree 23) Sometimes it feels like the only person who is not taken care of in this family is me. (strongly agree undecided disagree strongly) agree disagree 24) Compared to most mothers I am having a much easier time of it. (strongly agree undecided disagree strongly) agree disagree 25) A three month old baby can't really tell you what he is thinking by a smile. (strongly agree undecided disagree strongly) agree disagree 26) 27) 28) 29) 3o) 31) 32) 33) 173 I sometimes think that I may be missing out on maternal pleasures by working. (strongly agree undecided disagree strongly) agree disagree The experience of having a baby has made me a happier person. (strongly agree undecided disagree strongly) agree disagree People who don't have time to experience work before starting a family miss out. (strongly agree undecided disagree strongly) agree disagree When things get rough, I try and put my trust in the Lord. (strongly agree undecided disagree strongly) agree disagree Taking care of the baby leaves me on edge and tense. (strongly agree undecided disagree strongly) agree disagree In deciding when a baby is really ready to give up the bottle, a mother's judgement should be more important than what the baby seems to want. (strongly agree undecided disagree strongly) agree disagree I sometimes worry that the child may be sick or hurt while I am at work. (strongly agree undecided disagree strongly) agree disagree All parents have moments when they wish they didn't have children. (strongly agree undecided disagree strongly) agree disagree 174 34) Most mothers are not mature enough when their first child is born. (strongly agree undecided disagree strongly) agree disagree 35) When I feel myself getting down, I try to get out of the house. (strongly agree undecided disagree strongly) agree disagree 36) Compared to most mothers I am having a much harder time. (strongly agree undecided disagree strongly) agree disagree 37) Newborn babies are much more like each other than they are different from each other. (strongly agree undecided disagree strongly) agree disagree 38) Most men have more interesting work to do then their wives have. (strongly agree undecided disagree strongly) agree disagree 39) Taking care of a baby is much more work than pleasure. (strongly agree undecided disagree strongly) agree disagree 40) Since I've had this baby I have begun smoking cigarettes more often. (strongly agree undecided disagree strongly) agree disagree 41) People don't respect me enough for being a mother. (strongly agree undecided disagree strongly) agree disagree 42) 175 If I had known what it was like, I doubt I would have had this baby. (strongly agree undecided disagree strongly) agree disagree 43) Most of the time small babies don't even understand it when 44) 45) 46) their mothers smile at them. (strongly agree undecided disagree strongly) agree disagree I sometimes worry that my child will not be adequately cared for while I am at work. (strongly agree undecided disagree strongly) agree disagree Babies are more difficult to take care of when they are very young than when they are older. (strongly agree undecided disagree strongly) agree disagree If a woman waits too long she won't have enough energy to have a baby. (strongly agree undecided disagree strongly) agree disagree 47) Running a household and raising a child are not that 48) 49) difficult if you are organized. (strongly agree undecided disagree strongly) agree disagree I've been nervous and jumpy since having this baby. (strongly agree undecided disagree strongly) agree disagree The six-month-old baby can tell you exactly what he wants if you watch and listen. (strongly agree undecided disagree strongly) agree disagree 176 50) I sometimes miss contacts with people at work while I am at home with the baby. (strongly agree undecided disagree strongly) agree disagree 51) One big trouble about having babies is that you can't do the things you liked before the baby was born. (strongly agree undecided disagree strongly) agree disagree 52) I wish I had done more things before becoming a parent. (strongly agree undecided disagree strongly) agree disagree 53) Even though I have little time to myself these days, I know how to take care of my needs. (strongly agree undecided disagree strongly) agree disagree 54) Now that I am a mother, I will never reach my career dream. (strongly agree undecided disagree strongly) agree disagree 55) A baby's crying gets on your nerves after a while. (strongly agree undecided disagree strongly) agree disagree 56) A seven-month-old infant should be picked up when he cries. (strongly agree undecided disagree strongly) agree disagree 57) Even the best mother feels some disgust when cleaning up the mess in her infant's diaper. (strongly agree undecided disagree strongly) agree disagree 58) 59) 6o) 61) 62) 63) 64) 65) 177 If I'd have waited longer to have this baby I'd probably have more patience. (strongly agree undecided disagree strongly) agree disagree I still am involved in at least one activity outside the house. (strongly agree undecided disagree strongly) agree disagree I lost a lot of respect from people when I quit work to become a mother. (strongly agree undecided disagree strongly) agree disagree My mother was more mature than I am now when she had her first child. (strongly agree undecided disagree strongly) agree disagree If a mother plays very much with her seven-month-old baby he will want her to be around all the time. (strongly agree undecided disagree strongly) agree disagree A woman's life is really not complete unless she has a child. (strongly agree undecided disagree strongly) agree disagree I'm glad I didn't wait any longer to have this baby or I'd be too set in my ways. (strongly agree undecided disagree strongly) agree disagree Sometimes it is so hard taking care of a baby that I just want to go to sleep. (strongly agree undecided disagree strongly) agree disagree 66) 178 I enjoy the responsibility of being a mother. (strongly agree undecided disagree strongly) agree disagree 67) A mother gets physical pleasure out of holding, hugging and kissing her child. (strongly agree undecided disagree strongly) agree disagree 68) A mother has more pride in herself than a childless woman. 69) 70) 71) 72) 73) (strongly agree undecided disagree strongly) agree disagree What bugs me is when people tell me I'll get bored just being a mother. (strongly agree undecided disagree strongly) agree disagree I feel too old to be the mother of an infant. (strongly agree undecided disagree strongly) agree disagree Since I've had this baby I drink alcoholic beverages more often. (strongly agree undecided disagree strongly) agree disagree I find it hard to be patient with my child. (strongly agree undecided disagree strongly) agree disagree Babies need love and attention, but not nearly as much as most mothers give them. (strongly agree undecided disagree strongly) agree disagree 179 10 74) A mother has to make great sacrifices for her child. (strongly agree undecided disagree strongly) agree disagree 75) A woman has a hard time adjusting to motherhood when she's been free for too long. (strongly agree undecided disagree strongly) agree disagree 76) Parents should ignore their child's crying when it is just for attention. (strongly agree undecided disagree strongly) agree disagree 77) Children should be more considerate of their mothers, since their mothers do so much for them. (strongly agree undecided disagree strongly) agree disagree 78) If only I had waited longer to have this baby my husband might have had more time to help around the house. (strongly agree undecided disagree strongly) agree disagree 79) I worry about what's happening to my career while I am taking time off for mothering. (strongly agree undecided disagree strongly) agree disagree 80) When things get this bad, nothing you can do will help. (strongly agree undecided disagree strongly) agree disagree 81) Sometimes it's hard to put the baby's needs first. (strongly agree undecided disagree strongly) agree disagree 82) 83) 84) 85) 86) 87) 88) 89) 180 11 Things may be difficult now but I know things will not always be this hard. (strongly agree undecided disagree strongly) agree disagree I have more patience for my child than I ever imagined I would. (strongly agree undecided disagree strongly) agree disagree A child should be fed when he is hungry. (strongly agree undecided disagree strongly) agree disagree I wish more of my friends were having their babies now too. (strongly agree undecided disagree strongly) agree disagree I there's one thing I know it's how to organize my time. (strongly agree undecided disagree strongly) agree disagree I am more mature than a lot of the new mothers I see. (strongly agree undecided disagree strongly) agree disagree Babies act like they are the most important people in the household and are always demanding things. (strongly agree undecided disagree strongly) agree disagree The pain of childbirth is so great that a woman sometimes wonders if it's worthwhile. (strongly agree undecided disagree strongly) agree disagree 9o) 91) 92) 93) 94) 95) 96) 97) 181 12 Now that I am a mother, there are a lot of things I'll never get to try. (strongly agree undecided disagree strongly) agree disagree When things get me down, I just try and put it out of my mind. (strongly agree undecided disagree strongly) agree disagree Being able to watch while she gives birth is one of the most thrilling experiences of a mother's life. (strongly agree undecided disagree strongly) agree disagree If I'd have waited any longer to have this child, I'd have been too old. (strongly agree undecided disagree strongly) agree disagree I have had to give up all my activities outside the home since the baby was born. (strongly agree undecided disagree strongly) agree disagree Even though time is short, I still make time for some physical excercise. (strongly agree undecided disagree strongly) agree disagree When problems come up in the house, I'm the one who can solve them. (strongly agree undecided disagree strongly) agree disagree I just take each day as it comes and don't worry about the future. (strongly agree undecided disagree strongly) agree disagree 182 13 98) When things get rough, I try and talk about them with my husband. (strongly agree undecided disagree strongly) agree disagree 99) People say I have a good attitude. (strongly agree undecided disagree strongly) agree disagree 100) I'm the kind of person that is basically happy. (strongly agree undecided disagree strongly) agree disagree 101) If I have any problems with the baby, I can talk to my mother about it. (strongly agree undecided disagree strongly) agree disagree 102) When I'm not sure about something, I can always call my pediatrician. (strongly agree undecided disagree strongly) agree disagree 103) I get all the emotional support I need from my family. (strongly agree undecided disagree strongly) agree disagree 104) When I have questions about taking care of my baby, I can talk to other mothers about it. (strongly agree undecided disagree strongly) agree disagree 105) I see friends at least once a week. (strongly agree undecided disagree strongly) agree disagree 183 14 106) I attend meetings at a parents organization. Yes . No 107) Did you postpone having this child? Yes No If your answer to question 107 was yes, answer questions 108 and 109. If your answer to question 107 was no, go to question 110. 108) How long did you postpone having this child (Circle the appropriate response) less than one year 1-2 years 3-5 years 6-8 years . 9-10 years over 10 years O‘LflbWNt—t 184 15 109) Why did you postpone having this child? (circle up to three responses) 1) to have time to establish a strong relationship with my husband 2) To get settled in my job so I could come back to it after the baby was born 3) to allow time for my husband to get settled in his job 4) to have a chance to work before being a full time mother 5) to finish my education 6) to allow my husband to finish his education 7) to wait until I felt emotionally ready for a child 8) to wait until my husband felt emotionally ready for a child 9) to save up some money before having a child 10) to buy a house before having a child 11) to find the right relationship with a man before starting a family 12) I could not conceive 13) other 110) Overall, how would you rate the degree of difficulty you've had in adjusting to this baby? (please circle one response) 1 2 3 4 5 none slight moderate extensive severe ulI::r—————————————-------f—-———r* j, - 16 185 -- - ..- -.___-.___1 Subject I.D. (1-3) Card No. 01 Date Type (4-5) (6-11) (1 BEIWISALISTOFQJESTICNSABOJTYOJANDYCURFAMIIX. THEINFCRMATICNWIILBE USEDTOREPGU‘THEGHTERALQMRACTERISHCSGFTHElfln-IERSDQTMISSNDY. CNLYGROUP RESULTSWHLBEWEISIEDAMDMWG‘DEWWHLWANWS. MAMWWNMMMRMBESTDWYWGYQRFMY. 1. that is your marital status? (13) ( ) 1. Married ( ) 2. Single ( ) Divorced ( ) Separated ( ) Widowed 9‘?!” 2. How 1mg have you beai married? (144-5) 3. Ifyouareurmarried, howlmghaveywbeeninyocn'cm'rmt relaticnship? (16-17) 4. That is the last school grade that you cmpleted? (18) ( ) 1. lst to 8th grade ( ) 2. 9th to 12th grade ( ) Sane college but did not graduate ( ) 4. Graduated college ( ) Postgraduate college or professiaial U) U! 5. What is the last school grade canpleted by your hisband (19) '<) 1. lat to 8th grade ()2. 9tht012thgrade ( ) 3. Sane college but did not graduate ( ) 4. Graduated college ( ) 5. Postgraduate college or professimal g 6. That is your age? (20-21) 7. mat is your husband's age? (22-23) (24-25) 8. What is your baby's age inmonths? 186 that is your baby's birth date? What is your bab;,"s sex? ()1. Fanale ii. ()2. Male Did you participate in any p: enatal training classes? ( ) 1. Yes ( ) 2. No Appzmdmately what is your "-::esent ammal family income? ( ) 1. Under $4,000 () 2. $4,001 - $7,000 () 3. $7,001 - $10,000 ( ) 4. $10,001 - $13,000 ( ) 5. $13,001 - $16,000 ( ) 6. $16,001 - $20,000 ( ) 7. $20,001 - $30,000 ( ) 8. Over $30,000 Phat is your racial or e :hnic backround? ( ) 1. Write ( ) 2. Black ( ) 3. Maxim-America ( ) 4. American Indian '( ) 5.- Oriental ( ) 6. Other (Specify) Wat is M occupati n? What is your husband' 3 occupation? Are you cm'rently wc Icing? ()1. Yes ()2. No 17 _ <26) '(27) (28) (29) (3.0) (31) (32) 17. 18 . 19. 20. 187 If you are currently worldng, what is yam: work status? (33) ( ) 1. Full time ( ) 2. Pat time If your are not currently working, have you ever worked in the past? ( ) 1. Yes (34) ( ) 2. No Ifyouaremt arraitlyworking, doyouplan toworkinthe future? ( ) 1. Yes (35) ( ) 2. No Did you plan to have this baby? (36) ( ) 1. Yes ‘ ()2.N0 25. 26. . Howmmy stepchildrm do you have? ' 19 188 How is your infant fed? (55) ( ) 1. Breast fed ( ) 2. Bottle fed () 3. Sane oanbinatim of breast am! bottle ( ) 4. Other (Specify) “at was your infant's weight at birth? (57.59) That was your infant's length at birth? (GO-61) Baa yan: infant had any prolonged or general illness since birth? (52) ( ) 1. Yes () 2. N0 ‘ If yes, please describe the problem A (63-64) Has your infant: had any special problem with: Colic: ( ) 1. Yes < (65) , ( ) 2. No . . - Rashes (’ ) 1. Yes _, (66) - . ( ) 2. N0 Feedim ( ) 1. Yes (67) ( ) 2. No Sleeping( ) l. . Yes (68) y ( ) 2. No I fit?- ’ If yes, please describe the problem. (69-70) How many biological children do you have? 189 MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY UCHRIS PERMISSION FORM [\IVI'RSI I'Y (()\HIII I'IiI: ()\ RIM .-\R(‘H l\\‘OI.\'I.\(i EAST LANSING ' MICHIGAN ' 48824 HL’MAN SUBJECTS (UCRIHS) 235 AI)\II\I\IRAIIO\ BLII I)I\(; (51'13‘5-21811 April 7, 1982 .Ms. Esther Dienstag Department of Psychology Psychology Research Building Dear Ms. Dienstag: Subject: Proposal Entitled, "Parenting Study: Maternal Age as a Variable in Transition to Parenthood" I am pleased to advise that because of the nature of the proposed research, it was eligible for expedited review. This process has been completed, the rights and welfare of the human subjects appear to be adequately protected, and your project is therefore approved. , You are reminded that UCRIHS approval is valid for one calendar year. If you plan to continue this project beyond one year, please make provisions for obtaining appropriate UCRIHS approval prior to April 7, 1983. Any changes in procedures involving human subjects must be reviewed by the UCRIHS prior to initiation of the change. UCRIHS must also be notified promptly of any problems (unexpected side effects, complaints, etc.) involving human subjects during the course of the work. Thank you for bringing this project to our attention. If we can be of any future help, please do not hesitate to let us know. Sincerely, WW2 Henry E. Bredeck Chairman, UCRIHS HEB/jms cc: Dr. Fitzgerald PARENTING PROJECT 190 PARENT RECRUITMENT LETTER Dear Parent, Thank you for agreeing to participate in the parenting project. This is a study of first time mothers which looks at responses to the demands of being a parent. Please read each question carefully and circle the response that best describes your feelings at the present time. If you find that a particular question does not apply to you, simply write "NA" ( not applicable) next to that question. Please answer each question as honestly as possible trying not to skip any. Do not discuss your answers with your husband or friends until after you have completed the entire questionnaire. After you have completed the questionnaire, please return it along with the signed consent form which I have enclosed. This form assures me that you understand the nature of the study and have agreed to participate. You will find a self-addressed, stamped envelope in the packet. Please return the completed questionnaire and the signed consent form in this envelope. Participation in this research project is completely anonymous. You will.be assigned a code number and your name will not be . attached to any of the information which is received. Confidentiality and anonymity will be assured. The general group results of the study will be available to you if you are interested but individual records will not be available. If you wish to receive the group results, simply indicate this by checking the "Yes" response on the informed consent statement. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me during the day at (301) 528-2160 and during the evening at (301) 366-4629. Thank you. Cordially, Esther Dienstag 191 Parenting Project Informed Consent Statement I have freely consented to take part in a study of parents being conducted by Esther Dienstag of the Department of Psychology, Michigan State University and the University of Maryland Hospital under the supervision of Professor Hiram Fitzgerald, the Department of Psychology, Michigan State University. The study has been explained to me and I understand the explanation that has been given and what my participation will involve. I understand that I am free to discontinue my participation in the study at any time without penalty. I understand that the results of the study will be treated in strict confidence and that I will remain anonymous. Within these restrictions, results of the study will be made available to me at my request. I understand that my participation in this study does not guarantee any beneficial results to me. I understand that, at my request, I can receive additional explanation of the study after my participation is completed, but that procedures used to assure confidentiality prevents the release of individual results. Signed: Date: Do you wish to receive summaries of research reports that will be developed from the results of this study? Yes No 192 SUBJECT FEEDBACK FORM Esther Dienstag 910 Light St. Baltimore, MD 21230 Dear Parent, As you may recall, last year you participated in a research project for new mothers. At that time, you completed a questionnaire about your experiences with being a new parent. I'd like to share the results of this study with you. The purpose of this study was to understand women's adjustment to parenthood. One hundred and twenty five women participated in this study. The average age of the mothers was 28 and most of the mothers had attended some college, though many held postgraduate degrees. All had recently delivered their first child. The average age of the infants was three months old. All of the women had worked at some time and all but eight believed they would return to work sometime in the future. Fifty-one were working at the time of the study and 74 were not employed outside the home. Approximately half the mothers reported having postponed the birth of their first child, most for only a year or two but some for as many as 10 years. The most common reasons for postponing parenthood were to establish a strong marital relationship, financial reasons, or for one of the parents to feel emotionally prepared for parenthood, to finish an education or become established in a job. When all of the mothers were considered together, the following observations were made about adjustment to parenthood. Mothers who were older tended to hold more advanced educational degrees and these mothers tended to more strongly hold attitudes that encouraged responsiveness to infant cues like picking the child up when he cries for attention. Mothers who held these "responsive attitudes" were more satisfied with parenthood. Those mothers who did not experience enough support from friends and relatives or who did not feel they had enough outside activities were more dissatisfied with parenthood. Some of the infants in the study had been mildly ill, colicky, or had some difficulty with eating or sleeping. Mothers of these infants thought that having a young infant was difficult but had confidence that things would improve as the infants became older. These mothers were also more dissatisfied with parenthood. Some of the mothers who worked felt they were missing out on benefits of being at home with the baby full time. The higher the mother's education, the less likely she was to feel this way but the more responsive her attitudes toward the baby, the more likely she was to regret not being home full time. Working mothers who worked full time were more likely to feel torn between home and work than part time workers. Many of these working mothers felt that time pressures necessitated reducing outside activities and social time with friends. Although mothers who felt this role conflict did not enjoy parenthood less than other mothers, working mothers who were not satisfied with their social support were much more likely to be dissatisfied with parenthood. Working mothers who breast fed their infants felt the early infancy period was more difficult than did working mothers who bottle fed their infants. 193 For nonworking mothers, those mothers who missed the stimulation and challenge of work while they were at home full time were more likely to be dissatisfied with parenthood and to think early infancy was hard. Mothers who held higher educational degrees were more likely to miss work but mothers who held more "responsive attitudes" were less likely to miss work. Having a sick or difficult infant was harder for nonworking than for working mothers. They were more disstisfied with parenthood, possibly because they had fewer outlets and less time away from caretaking than their working counterparts. Nonworking mothers who breast fed their babies were not more likely to think early infancy was especially hard. In general, mothers who had the easiest time during their adjustment period had more social support and outlets outside the home, were happy with their work decision whether or not they decided to return to work right away, and believed that motherhood was an important and fulfilling role for women. Women who had a more difficult time experienced less social contacts (and this was especially difficult for those working outside the home), had temperamentally difficult or ill infants, or felt a loss of some valued activities either at work or at home with the baby. Women who valued the mothering role less also tended to enjoy parenthood less, especially if they were not working outside the home where they might have the opportunity for other kinds of activities. Thank you for your help in completing this project. Your assistance has helped to clarify some of the predictors of fulfillment in early mothering and to provide some clues for successful combination of work and motherhood. This is very useful since now about half of all mothers with children under age three work outside the home. If you have any further questions, please feel free to write for more information. Sincerely, Esther Dienstag ”Illllllllllwill?