. :N. V ‘J .I'fir'. 3.1 .};p ‘\ 'V‘u .. _ v L " ill 1.11:“ ‘ .n" "I. ."-". - 'V. I II..(¢" .1? I. 1w' til!" "I I I l' It'd" \‘..' _. .I'V'I‘Vu'fl' 6‘: I "-' "Cl‘n‘I IL, II 'JIF'...’ J," III." .I. | I'L' I J I . \ " ‘I ‘I'k‘fl:'\‘. ‘ 1;. ,' ' .I, u H“ ' " U“ .‘m. we MI. .,; .- I: .3 ." ".3. .- - JIM r JV». i"; In gum ‘ 3 1293 10809 4395 Inc MIMI/III “mum IT I L H L-a— am- 'IIIfi i e. O a ‘ 2 '.T~‘.$’f.’_l’3' 6: 12mg)“ win.‘--‘§.'m~ -‘W‘Nw . . .1 : t-u-e- wens}!- ’Jv; '" uuu‘EU van-In“- This is to certify that the dissertation entitled MECHANISMS OF AND BARRIERS TO SPIROPLASMA CITRI INFECTION OF MACROSTELES FASCIFRONS (STAL) presented by Thomas Minster Mowry has been accepted towards fulfillment of the requirements for Ph . D . degree in But omo logy A Major professor ’ . Date November 21, 1985 MS U i: an Affirmative Action/Equal Opportunity Institution 0-12771 MSU RETURNING MATERIALS: Place in book drop to LIBRARIES remove this checkout from .—c_. your record. FINES will be charged if book is returned after the date stamped below. a . a.” - :- .~I..J- ’ w’“ 3 0 no“ A MECHANISMS OF AND BARRIERS TO SPIROPIASMA CITRI INFECTION OF MACROSTELES FASCIFRONS (STAL) by Thomas Minster Mowry A DISSERTATION Submitted to Michigan State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Department of Entomology 1986 ABSTRACT MECHANISMS OF AND BARRIERS TO SPIROPLASMA CITRI INFECTION OF MACROSTELES FASCIFRONS (STAL) by Thomas Minster Mowry Research was done to demonstrate that barriers to infection of noncompetent Macrosteles fascifrons (Stal) by Spiroplasma citri exist and to probe the infection mechanisms in competent leafhoppers. A technique for sectioning fixed and frozen leathppers and preparation of these sections for scanning electron microsc0py was developed. In- ternal leathpper morphology was exceptionally well preserved and dis- cernable. A colloidal gold-IgG conjugate that labelled the surface of g. citri was used, along with ELISA, to assess the antigenic response of the spirOplasma to glutaraldehyde fixation. The surface antigens of §. citri were numerous and randomly distributed in the membrane. Labelled antigens exhibited patching in unfixed cells, indicating that they are mobile within the membrane. While ELISA showed a predictable decline in overall antigenicity with increasing glutaraldehyde concen- tration, cells labelled equally well at all fixative levels. Colloidal gold-labelled cells were easily detected in the scanning electron mi- crosc0pe in the backseatter mode. These data indicated that _S_. SEE} could be detected within glutaraldehyde-fixed leathpper sections. Twelve successive passages of the horseradish brittle root isolate of §. citri, 24 through 35, were injected into adult leafhoppers. For natural acquisition, adult leathppers were fed on §_. c_i_t_1_:i-infected asters. After appropriate incubation periods, surviving leathppers were caged individually on aster seedlings. Leafhoppers were removed and frozen prior to spirOplasma isolation attempts from individual in- sects. Phytotoxin activity of each passage was monitored. Membrane preparations of passages 26 and 34 were analyzed with SDS-PAGE. 0f the injected leafhoppers, 3.6% transmitted g. citri while 50% had acquired the pathogen. Of those naturally fed, 0.72 transmitted and 5.4% acquired §, citri. 'These results indicate that both mesenteronal and post-mesenteronal barriers to g. SEEEl infection and transmission exist in g. fascifrons. The barriers involve different or modified mechanisms for their penetration as seen by only one of the naturally acquiring leathppers being able to transmit the pathogen. None of the passages lost phytotoxin activity, indicating that in vitgg passage probably reduces transmissibility rather than pathogenicity. Membrane analysis revealed the loss of a protein from the membrane of passage 34 relative to passage 26 which may be involved in binding of the pathogen to host cell membranes prior to endocytosis and ultimate completion of the transmission cycle. DEDICATION To my wife, Mary, who has loved me with the love of Christ. I pray He will bring her great reward, because this result is unworthy of the sacrifice she has made. ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would.like to thank Dr. Mark Whalon, my Graduate.Advisor, for persevering with and praying for me throughout the often tumultuous days of this program. Neither of us yet realizes how important his role has been, but his patience will be rewarded. In addition, I thank Drs. Jim Bath, Ed Grafius, and Harold Miller for their input into this research and encouragement to attain the prize. My good friends, Drs. Jim Miller and Karen Klomparens, deserve special gratitude. Their support in both the good and desperate times prevented some foolish decisions being made. If I can obtain a small measure of their excellence and compassion, II will have been educated indeed. Finally, I would like to thank my daughters Teresa and Trista for often doing without, yet fully supporting, me through six long years. They are truly the glory of their father. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES . . . . . . . . . LIST OF FIGURES. . . . . . . . . GENERAL INTRODUCTION . . . . . . Mycoplasmas as Plant Pathogens. Characteristics of Spiroplasmas Spiroplasma-Leafhopper Interactions Literature Cited. . . CHAPTER I: Introduction. . . . . . . . Materials and Methods . . . Results . . . . . . . . . . Discussion. . . . . . . . . Literature Cited. . . . . . CHAPTER II: Introduction. . . . . . . . Materials and Methods . . . Spiroplasma Culture. . Antiserum Production . INVESTIGATION OF LEAFHOPPER INTERNAL SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY MORPHOLOGY VIA OF FROZEN EFFECTS OF GLUTARALDEHYDE FIXATION ON OVERALL ANTIGENICITY OF SECTIONS. . SURFACE SPIROPLASMA CITRI . Preparation of Colloidal Gold-IgG Conjugate. Fixation of Spiroplasma citri. . . Colloidal 601d hbelling O O C O O I O O O O Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA). . iv vi vii 10 12 16 19 21 23 24 26 26 26 29 31 33 34 TABLE OF CONTENTS, continued Results . . . . . . . . . . . Discussion. . . . . . . . . . Literature Cited. . . . . . . CHAPTER III: AND TRANSMISSION OF SPIROPLASMA CITRI. . Introduction. . . . . . . . . Materials and Methods . . . . SpirOplasma and Leathpper Cultures. . . . Passage and Injection of Spiroplasma citri Acquisition of Spiroplasma citri from Plants Isolation of SpirOplasmas. Phytotoxin Assay . . . . Membrane Preparation . . Membrane ElectrOphoresis Results . . . . . . . . . . . Discussion. . . . . . . . . . Literature Cited. . . . . . . GENERAL CONCLUSION . . . . . . . . EFFECTS OF IN VITRO PASSAGE ON THE PLASMA MEMBRANE 36 45 48 SO 51 54 54 54 55 57 57 58 59 61 67 7O 74 Table Table Table Table II-l. III-1. III-2. III-3. LIST OF TABLES ELISA results for the horseradish brittle root isolate of SpirOplasma citri fixed in various concentrations of glutaraldehyde. . Number of colony forming units (CFUs) of the horseradish brittle root isolate of Spiroplasma citri injected into Macrosteles fascifrons. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Effects of in vitro passage on acquisition and transmission of the horseradish brittle root isolate of Spiroplasma citri by injected Macrosteles fascifrons . . . . . . Natural acquisition and transmission of the horseradish brittle root isolate of Spiroplasma citri by Macrosteles fascifrons vi 43 56 62 63 Figure Figure Figure Figure Figure Figure Figure Figure Figure Figure II-l. 11-2. 11-3. 11-4. 11-5. 11-6 0 LIST OF FIGURES Equipment necessary for sectioning fragile specimens for scanning electron microscopy. Processing of frozen sections for scanning electron microscoPy . . . . . . . . . . . . Frozen section of Scaphytopius acutus (Say) processed through dehydration and critical pOint dry1ng I O I O O O O O O O O O O O O O Frozen section of Macrosteles fascifrons (Stal) processed through lyophilization . . pH isotherm for the gold colloid produced by the sodium citrate method. . . . . . . . IgG absorption isotherm for the gold colloid produced by the sodium citrate methOd O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O I C O Transmission.electron.micrographs of the horseradish brittle root isolate of Spiroplasma citri fixed in various concentrations of glutaraldehyde and labelled with a specific colloidal gold-IgG conjugate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Scanning electron micrographs of the horseradish brittle root isolate of §2i£22l2§22 sitzi fixed in 3-574 glutaraldehyde and labelled with a specific colloidal gold-IgG conjugate. . . . . . . . Transmission electron micrographs of the horseradish brittle root isolate of Spiroplasma citri unfixed and labelled with a specific colloidal gold-IgG conjugate . . Transmission electron micrographs of the horseradish brittle root isolate of §Ri£22l2§ee 9.12:1 fixed in 3-51 glutaraldehyde and pretreated with nonspecific and specific IgG pmior to labelling with a specific colloidal gold- IgG conjugate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . vii 14 15 17 18 30 32 37 38 39 4O LIST OF FIGURES, continued Figure Figure Figure Figure Figure 11-7. II-8. II-9. III-1. III-2. Transmission electron.micrographs of the horseradish brittle root isolate of §21£22l§§22 213.121 fixed in 3-574 glutaraldehyde prior to attempted labelling with a goat anti-rabbit colloidal gold conjugate (A) and unconjugated colloidal gold(B). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Scanning electron micrographs of sheep red blood cells fixed in 2.0% glutaraldehyde prior to attempted labelling with a Spiroplasma citri-specific colloidal gold- IgG conjugate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Effects of glutaraldehyde fixation on the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for the horseradish brittle root isolate of Spiroplasma citri . . . . . . . . . . . . . Effects of in vitro passage on phytotoxin production of the horseradish brittle root isolate of Spiroplasma citri. . . . . . . . SDS-PAGE analysis of purified membranes of the horseradish brittle root isolate of Spiroplasma citri from passages 26 and 34 . viii 41 42 44 65 66 GENERAL INTRODUCTION Mchplasmas as Plant Pathogens The etiology of yellows-type plant diseases was for years con- sidered to be viral (Whitcomb and Black 1982) until the historic report of Doi et al. (1967) implicated mycoplasmas as possible causal agents. Since then, two rather distinct groups of wall-free prokaryotic plant pathogens have been defined: the pleomorphic mycoplasmalike organisms (MLOs) and the helical Spiroplasmas. The MLOs remain an enigma, having escaped in vitro isolation (Chen et al. 1982; Hayflick and Arai 1973) and, therefore, the definitive proof that they are the causal agents of the diseases with which they are associated. MLOs are, however, as- sumed to cause such diseases as aster yellows, X-disease, clover phyl- lody, and blueberry stunt (Nielson 1979). Unlike the MLOs, nmny spirOplasmas affecting plants, arthrOpods, and vertebrates have been isolated and maintained i_n m (Whitcomb 1980; 1981). Knowledge of spirOplasma existence is very recent, being first recognized by Davis et al. (1972) in electron micrographs of corn stunt-infected plant tissue. The first spiroplasma isolated in vitro was a vertebrate pathogen, the suckling mouse cataract agent, but was misidentified as a spirochete due to its morphology (Clark 1964). It was the corn stunt spiroplasma (CSS) that was first isolated from plant tissues, but this culture was neither maintained nor cloned (Chen and Granados 1970). Subsequently, two separate groups isolated a spiro- plasma from citrus stubborn-infected plant tissue that were maintained in continuous culture (Fudl-Allah.et al. 1971; Saglio et‘al. 1971). Markham et al. (1974) fulfilled Koch's postulates for this citrus spi- roplasma, which was the first true mycoplasma proven to cause plant disease. This organism has since been named Spiroplasma citri (Saglio et al. 1973). It was again.two independent groups that.finally iso- lated, amintained in continuous culture, and fulfilled Koch’s postu- lates for the CSS (Chen and Liao 1975; Williamson and Whitcomb 1975). To date, among the approximately 25 spirOplasmas available from the American Type Culture Collection, only S. ElEEl and the CSS are phyto- pathogenic. Characteristics of SpirOplaslas It is of considerable interest that the spiroplasmas represent a unique group of microorganisms. They are prokaryotes exhibiting spiral morphology and motility without the aid of a cell wall, as possessed by spirochetes which demonstrate similar properties (Whitcomb 1981). Spi- r0plasmas do possess cytoplasmic protein fibrils, ‘possibly related to their morphology and motility, which are present in both helical and nonhelical variants (Townsend and Archer 1983). In analyzing partially purified membranes of these variants, Townsend et al. (1980) found that a protein of molecular weight 39,000 was absent in the nonhelical strain. These authors postulated that the missing membrane protein was necessary for binding the cytoplasmic protein fibrils to the membrane in order to complete the structure necessary for the spirOplasma’s he- lical properties. Both variants of S. citri maintain phytOpathogenici- ty (Townsend et al. 1977) and some have speculated that plant MLOs are in fact noncultivable spiroplasmas (Davis 1974). However, it has been shown that the spirOplasma-specific cytoplasmic protein fibrils are 3 absent in.MLOs infecting plants with several yellows diseases (Townsend 1983). Spiroplasmas are intracellular parasites, as are the MLOs, which distinguishes them from the animal myc0p1asmas (Myc0plasmataceae). The genome size of S. SlEEl is about 109 daltons, approximately double that of the Myc0plasmataceae (Maniloff 1972; Saglio et al. 1973). This ad- ditional genetic material may be necessary to code for the proteins that may be involved in the mechanisms of intracellular parasitism as well as those that maintain morphology and motility. In any event, spiroplasmas demonstrate classical myc0plasma characteristics including the lack of a cell wall with no reversion to walled forms, no murein cell wall precursors, ability to pass through 0.22 pm filters, forma- tion of umbonate colonies on solid media, and complete resistance to penicillin (Bové and Saillard 1979). In addition to motility, spiroplasmas exhibit an active chemotaxis toward and away from such substances as amino acids and certain vita- mins (Daniels et al. 1980). The prOperties of motility and chemotaxis may play'an.important part in the adaptation of spiroplasmas to the diverse habitats of plant phloem and leathpper tissues (Whitcomb 1981). I have observed that symptoms of S. giggi and the aster yellows MLO in aster always appear first in the new crown growth, regardless of the original inoculation point. This indicates that these organisms may migrate to the root system from which they are redistributed throughout the plant. SpiroplaslarLeafhopper Interactions PhytOpathogenic spiroplasmas are pathogenic to some of their leaf- hopper vectors (Whitcomb and Williamson 1975; 1979), suggesting that these insects may not be important in the natural maintenance of the disease (Whitcomb 1981). Survival is reduced with S. w infection of Circulifer tenellus (Baker) (Liu et al. 1983b) and CSS infection of Dalbulus elimatus (Ball) (Madden and Nault 1983). In contrast, the survival of Dalbulus maidis (DeLong and Wolcott), a principle vector of the CSS is unaffected by the pathogen (Madden and Nault 1983). This phenomenon allows speculation that the CSS is a mutualist in S. w, as is apparently the case with the aster yellows MLO and Macrosteles fascifrons (Stal) (Whitcomb and Williamson 1979). No such mutualism has been demonstrated with S. 2123.1. and any of its identified leafhop~ per vectors. S. 91331 is circulative and propagative in its leathpper vector, S. tenellus (Liu et al. 1983a; 1983b). This means that S. glt_rimust pass through, and possibly multiply in, at least three tissue types: gut epithelium, hemolymph, and salivary acini (Whitcomb 1981). Al- though not yet experimentally demonstrated, this is probably true for the CSS and its leafhopper vectors. The molecular mechanisms that allow for spir0plasma infection of these tissues have not been eluci- dated. Liu (1982) speculated that S. gig; might enter the hemocoel from the gut lumen by passing through the endOplasmic reticulum, which is continuous from the outside to the inside of the epithelium. His own electron microscopic evidence, however, does not support this idea. Electron micrographs have shown S. gig; inside gut epithelial cells and salivary acini (Liu et al. 1983b), indicating that the microorgan- ism had to cross the plasma membrane. Because spirOplasma transmission depends upon the circulative and propagative nature of the pathogen in its vector, it is obvious that anything that blocks these processes constitutes a barrier to transmission. Multiplication of S. girl in the hemolymph of leafhoppers incapable of transmitting the pathogen (Whitcomb et al. 1973) indicates that membranes may be the principle barriers, physically and/or chemically. Among the possible mechanisms for the entrance of pathogens into host cells is receptor-mediated endocytosis (RME). In this mechanism, the pathogen has a ligand on its surface that is recognized by a recep- tor on the host cell membrane which, when bound by the ligand, initi- ates a series of events that results in the endocytosis of the pathogen (Lonberg-Holm 1981). A number of viruses engage in RME to infect their respective hosts (Lenard and Miller 1983). The attachment of Mycoplasma pneumoniae to host cell membranes involves the ligand-receptor complex (Kahane et al. 1982), but endocy- tosis does not occur as these pathogens are extracellular parasites (Clyde 1979). In light of this, it is not unreasonable to hypothesize that RME may be the mechanism of cell penetration used by spirOplasmas in their leafhopper hosts. Research was initiated in an attempt to test this general hypothesis. LITERATURE CITED Bové, J.M. and C. Saillard. 1979. Cell biology of spiroplasmas. Pp. 83-153 in: The Mycoplasmas, Vol. 3. R.F. Whitcomb and J.G. Tully, eds. Academic Press, New York. Chen, T.A. and R.R. Granados. 1970. Plant-pathogenic mycoplasmalike organism: Maintenance in vitro and transmission to Zea mayS L. Science 167: 1633-1636. Chen, T.A. and C.H. Liao. 1975. Corn stunt spirOplasma: Isolation, cultivation, and proof of pathogenicity. Science 188: 1015-1017. Chen, T.A., J.M. Wells, and C.H. Liao. 1982. Cultivation in vitro: Spiroplasmas, plant mchplasmas, and other fastidious, walled prokaryotes. Phytopathol. Prokaryotes 2: 417-446. Clark, H.F. 1964. Suckling mouse cataract agent. J. Infect. Dis. 114: 476-487. Clyde, W.A., Jr. 1979. Myc0plasma pneumoniae infections of man. Pp. 275-306 in: The Mycoplasmas, Vol. 2. .JJS. Tully and R.F. Whitcomb, eds. Academic Press, New York. 509 pp. Daniels, M.J., J.M Longland, and J. Gilbart. 1980. Aspects of motility and chemotaxis in spirOplasmas. J. Gen. Microbiol. 118: 429-436. Davis, R.E. 1974. New approaches to the diagnosis and control of plant yellows diseases. Pp. 289-302 in: Proceedings of the Third International Symposium on Virus Diseases of Ornamental Plants. R.H. Lawson and M.K. Corbett, eds. Davis, R.E., J.F. Worley, R.F. Whitcomb, T. Ishijima, and R.L. Steere. 1972. Helical filaments produced by a mycoplasma-like organism associated with corn stunt disease. Science 176: 521-523. Doi, Y., M. Teranaka, K. Yora, and H. Asuyama. 1967. Mycoplasma- or PLT group-like microorganisms found in the phloem elements of plants infected with mulberry dwarf, potato witches' broom, aster yellows, or Paulownia witches' broom. Ann. Phytopathol. Soc. Jpn. 33: 259-266. Fudl-Allah, A.E.-S., E.C. Calavan, and E.C.K. Igwegbe. 1971. Culture of a myc0plasma-like organism associated with stubborn disease of citrus. Phytopathology 61: 1321. (abstr.). Hayflick, L. and S. Arai. 1973. Failure to isolate mchplasmas from aster yellows diseased plants and leathppers. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 225: 494-502. Kahane, I., M. Banai, S. Razin, and J. Feldner. 1982. Attachment of myc0plasmas to host cell membranes. Rev. Infect. Dis. 4: $185- $192. Lenard, J. and D.K. Miller. 1983. Entry'of enveloped viruses into cells. Pp. 119-138 in: Receptor Mediated Endocytosis. P. Cuatrecasas and T. Roth, eds. Chapman and Hall, New York. 304 pp. Liu, H.-Y. 1982. The transmission, multiplication and electron microscopic examination of Spiroplasma citri in its vector, Circulifer tenellus. Ph.D. Thesis, Univ. Calif., Riverside. 101 PP- Liu, H.-Y., D.J. Gumpf, G.N. Oldfield, and E.C.Calavan. 1983a. Transmission of Spiroplasma citri by Circulifer tenellus. Phytopathology 73: 582-585. Liu, H.-Y., D.J. Gumpf, G.N. Oldfield, and E.C. Calavan. 1983b. The relationship of Spiroplasma citri and Circulifer tenellus. Phytopathology 73: 585-590. Lonberg-Holm, K. 1981. Attachment.of animal viruses to cells: An introduction. Pp. 1-20 in: Virus Receptors, Part 2: Animal Viruses. K. Lonberg-Holm and L. Philipson, eds. Chapman and Hall, New York. 217 pp. Madden, L.V. and L.R. Nault. 1983. Differential pathogenicity of corn stunting mollicutes to leafhopper vectors in Dalbulus and Baldulus species. Phytopathology 73: 1608-1614. Maniloff, J. 1972. Cytology of the mycoplasmas. Pp. 67-91 in: Pathogenic Mycoplasmas: A Ciba Foundation Symposium. Associated Scientific Publishers, Amsterdam. 404 pp. Markham, P.G., R. Townsend, M. Bar-Joseph, M.J. Daniels, A. Plaskitt, and B.M. Meddins. 1974. Spiroplasmas are the causal agents of citrus little-leaf disease. Ann. Appl. Biol. 78: 49-57. Nielson, M.W. 1979. Taxonomic relationships of leafhopper vectors of plant pathogens. Pp. 3-27 in: Leathpper Vectors and Plant Disease Agents. K. Maramorosch and R.F. Harris, eds. Academic Press, New York. 654 pp. Saglio, P., D. Lafleche, C. Bonissol, and J.M. Bové. 1971. Culture 12 vitro des mycoplasmes associés au "Stubborn" des agrumes et leur observation au microscope électronique. H.R. Hebd. Séances Acad. Sci. Ser. D 272: 1387-1390. Saglio, P., M. L’Hospital, D. Lafleche, G. Dupont, J.M. Bové, J.G. Tully, and E.A. Freundt. 1973. sgroplasma gitri gen. and sp. n.: A mycoplasma-like organism associated with "Stubborn" disease of citrus. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 23: 191-204. Townsend, R. 1983. Myc0plasma-like organisms from plants with "yellows" diseases lack a spiroplasma-specific antigen. .1. Gen. Microbiol. 129: 1959-1964. Townsend, R. and D.B. Archer. 1983. A fibril protein antigen Specific to Spiroplasma. J. Gen. Microbiol. 129: 199-206. Townsend, R., J. Burgess, and K.A. Plaskitt. 1980. Morphology and ultrastructure of helical and nonhelical strains of Spiroplasma citri. J. Bacteriol. 142: 973-981. Townsend, R., P.G. Markham, K.A. Plaskitt, and.M.J. Daniels. 1977. Isolation and characterization of a non-helical strain of SpirOplasma citri. J. Gen. Microbiol. 100: 15-21. Whitcomb, R.F. 1980. The genus Spiroplasma. Ann. Rev. Microbiol. 34: 677-709. Whitcomb, R.F. 1981. The biology of spiroplasmas. Ann. Rev. Entomol. 26: 397-425. Whitcomb, R.F. and L.M. Black. 1982. Plant and arthropod mycoplasmas: A historical perspective. Pp. 40-81 in: Plant and Insect Mycoplasma Techniques. M.J. Daniels and P.G. Markham, eds. John Wiley and Sons, New York. 369 pp. Whitcomb, R.F., J.G. Tully, J.M. Bové, and P. Saglio. 1973. Spiroplasmas and acholeplasmas: Multiplication in insects. Science 182: 1251-1253. Whitcomb, R.F. and D.L. Williamson. 1975. Helical wall-free prokaryotes in insects: Multiplication and pathogenicity. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 266: 260-275. Whitcomb. R.F. and D.L. Williamson. 1979. Pathogenicity of mchplasmas for arthropods. Zbl. Bakt. Hyg., I. Abt. Orig. A 245: 200-221. Williamson, D.L. and R.F. Whitcomb. 1975. Plant myc0plasmas: A cultivable spiroplasma causes corn stunt disease. Science 188: 1018-1020. CBAPIERI INVESTIGATION OF LEAFHOPPER INTERNAL MORPHOLWY VIA SCANNING ELECTRON NIQOSCOPY 0P FROZEN SBCTIWS INTRODUCTION The internal morphology of leathppers has been studied primarily from the standpoint of individual organs and their function. Much of this work was predicated upon the importance of these organs in the transmission of plant pathogens or in secretion of substances toxic to plant hosts (e.g., Gil-Fernandez and Black 1965; Nuorteva 1956). In this regard, much emphasis has been placed upon the salivary glands and associated secretory tissues (e.g., Raine and Forbes 1971; Raine et al. 1976; Sogawa 1965). Some researchers, however, have done more exten- sive work on internal morphology. Dobroscky (1931) did a rather de- tailed study of Macrosteles fascifrons (Stal) using histological stain- ing and light microscopy. She concluded that the aster yellows agent was not detectable in the leafhopper (Dobroscky 1929). More recently, Gil-Fernandez and Black (1965) investigated the internal morphology of Agallia constricta (Van Duzee), a vector of wound-tumor virus. Both of these works, while done very well, were technologically limited and, therefore, somewhat inconclusive. Dobroscky (1931) used light micro- graphs with morphology left unlabelled, making it extremely difficult to locate and identify internal structures. Gil-Fernandez and Black (1965) published only schematic drawings resulting in problems when trying to repeat their work with actual specimens under the microsc0pe. Sogawa (1965) only examined salivary glands of various leathppers, but published both light micrographs, schematic drawings, and tracings that are very useful guides to the further study of these organs. Definitive localization of plant pathogens within their leathpper 10 11 vectors requires that the insects be examined without organ dissection. This is especially true if tissues acting as barriers to transmission are to be identified. Liu et al. (1983) followed the course of Spiroplasma citri infection of Circulifer tenellus (Baker) by dissect- ing out various organs at progressive times and preparing them for ul- trathin sectioning and transmission electron microsc0py (TEM). While appropriate for studies of detailed ultrastructural relationships, this approach leaves to speculation the actual progress of infection as all tissues, e.g., hemolymph, cannot be examined in this manner. Sinha and Chiykowski (1967) used a similar dissection method to detect the pres- ence of the aster yellows MLO in various internal tissues of Macrosteles fascifrons (Stal) by homogenizing dissected organs and in- jecting the homogenate into noninfected leafhoppers and monitoring any subsequent transmission. This approach, even carefully performed, can- not completely avoid MLO contamination from other tissues and would, therefore, be inappropriate for detection of barrier tissues. Using frozen sections of whole insects and immunofluorescence, D01 (1970) and D01 et al. (1967) localized Japanese encephalitis virus in its 9.2L?! mosquito vectors. This method provides the kind of information neces- sary for barrier tissue studies, but it may'not be feasible for use with large numbers of specimens that would need to be examined to de- tect noncompetent vectors. Preparation of fragile biological specimens for studying internal morphology in the scanning electron microscope (SEM) can be difficult when trying to preserve spatial and ultrastructural integrity. Sec- tioning methods often produce unusable products. For example, freeze fracturing follows planes of natural weakness (Postek et al. 1980) 12 making it almost impossible to obtain reproducible sections from com- plex organisms. Moreover, because of the extreme brittleness of tissue frozen in liquid nitrogen, serial sections or sections through specific areas cannot be cut from the same specimen. Use of the cryostat par- tially alleviates these problems, but obtaining the desired sectioning plane can still be very difficult due to problems in precise orienta- tion of the embedded specimen. Due to infiltration problems, embedding specimens in various polymers used for ultrathin sectioning is usually not feasible with many relatively large or nonpermeable samples which may be used for morphological studies. Resin digestion to restore to- pography is harsh and often destroys fine detail. In addition, embed- ding media and/or digestion may chemically modify the specimen so that immunological labels cannot be used (Hemming et a1. 1983). Herein I describe a rapid, simple, and inexpensive method of pre- paring leafhoppers for examination of internal morphology using the scanning electron microscope. The results overcome most of the diffi- culties encountered with the light microscopic techniques mentioned above. ‘NAIERIALS ANDMNETHODS The leathppers used in this work were ScaphytoPius acutus (Say) and Macrosteles fascifrons (Stal) reared separately in the greenhouse on red clover (Trifolium pratense L.) and barley (Hordeum vulgare L.), respectively. Adults were fixed in 2% (v/v) glutaraldehyde in phos- phate buffered saline (PBS; 0.01M phosphate + 0.15M NaCl, pH 7.4) for 2 hrs at room temperature and washed three times for 30 min each in PBS prior to embedding. 13 The materials required for sectioningiand'handling the insects are; a sectioning stage, an injector razor blade clamped in a hemo- stat, 2 cm long pieces of teflon tubing with an ID equal to the OD of the SEM stub being used, and small pieces of microscope lens tissue (Fig. 1a). The liquid nitrogen-cooled sectioning stage was constructed from a block of styrofoam by cutting a hole in the center large enough to accommodate a 5 cm deep X 7 cm diameter crystalizing dish that serves as a reservoir for the liquid nitrogen. Around this hole a groove was cut to allow a 9 cm diameter petri dish to rest upside down on top of the crystalizing dish and flush with the styrofoam surface. Ten min after filling the crystalizing dish with liquid nitrogen, the petri dish.stage:had reached its coldest temperature. Subsequently applied drape of Tissue-TekR thoroughly hardened within 15 sec. Leathppers were embedded in Tissue-TekR by placing a drOp on the cold stage and quickly inserting the insect before the medium hardened. In these experiments, the dorsal surface was left exposed to facilitate sectioning orientation (Figp 1b). Any orientation may be selected but the specimen must be inserted into the Tissue-TekR before it hardens for successful sectioning. Longitudinal sections approximately 0.25 mm thick were cut using a teflon-coated injector razor blade clamped in a hemostat (Fig. 1a) and transferred to PBS-wetted lens tissue positioned on top of 2 cm long pieces of 3/8 inch ID teflon tubing (Fig. 2a). Another piece of PBS-wetted lens tissue was sandwiched over the first and both were fastened to the tubing with wire (Fig. 2b). This sand- wich formed the means for handling the fragile sections during a buffer wash to remove the Tissue-TekR, dehydration through a graded ethanol series, and subsequent critical point drying. Figure I—1.——Equipment necessary for sectioning fragile specimens for scanning electron microscopy. (A) Tools for sectioning include sectioning stage, injector razor blade clamped in a hemostat, pieces of teflon tubing, lens tissue for forming sandwich (see text), and rack to hold tubing throughout the procedure. (B) Frozen sectioning stage with leafhopper embedded in Tissue-Tek’ (arrow) ready for sectioning. Figure I—2.-—Processing of frozen sections for scanning electron micro— scopy. (A) Steps necessary in forming section sandwich include transfer of frozen sections to wet lens tissue already draped over teflon tubing, covering sections with second piece of lens tissue, securing lens tissue with wire, and trimming both wire and lens tissue. (B) Com- pleted section sandwich ready for dehydration and critical point drying. (C) Critical point driednsections being mounted by inserting stub with Tubecoat“ up through the teflon tubing. (D) Mounted sections (arrow) with upper layer of lens tissue removed. 16 Following critical point drying, the wire was removed and a 3/8 inch OD aluminum stub with TubecoatR on the upper surface was gently pushed up the teflon tubing until it contacted the lens paper sandwich (Fig. 2c). Care was taken to put just enough TubecoatR on the stub to seep through the paper and contact the sections without flooding them and thereby ruining morphology. When the TubecoatR had dried, the upper layer of lens paper was carefully removed leaving the sections attached to the stub with the lower layer of lens paper, the excess of which was trimmed off with a razor blade. (Fig. 2d). In addition to dehydration and critical point drying, sections were also lyophilized. Following the buffer wash, the sandwich was rinsed in distilled water, removed from the tubing, and spread on fil- ter paper in a 9 cm diameter petri dish. The tap layer of tissue paper was removed and the sections were frozen at -25 C prior to placing them in a Virtis Preservator 120 lyophilizer for 24 hrs. LyOphilized sec- tions were carefully attached directly to the stubs with TubecoatR. All specimens were sputter coated with approximately 30 nm of gold and examined in a JEOL JSM 35C scanning electron microsc0pe operated at 15 kV. RESUETS Sectioned, dehydrated, and critical point dried S. Sggggg prepared using this method demonstrated well preserved ultrastructure and easily identified tissues and organs (Fig. 3). Sectioned and lyophilized M. fascifrons also demonstrated organ and tissue integrity and spatial relationships which were well maintained (Fig. 4). Thoracic flight musculature was readily discernable as were abdominal digestive l7 Figure I—3.-—Frozen section of Scaphytopius acutus (Say) processed through dehydration and critical point drying. (A) Whole body section showing intact head, thorax, and abdomen with associated internal morphology. (B) Salivary gland. (C) Intracellular ultrastructure of salivary gland. AL, anterior lobe; CC, coagulated cytoplasm; DM, direct flight muscles; FG, foregut; HG, hindgut; LC, longitudinal con— nective; LM, longitudinal flight muscles; PL, posterior lobe; SG, salivary gland; SGr, secretory granule; SubG, subesophageal ganglion; Squ, supraesophageal ganglion; TC, Tubecoat‘. Figure I-4.--Frozen section of Macrosteles fascifrons (Stal) processed through lyophilization. (A) Whole body section showing intact head, thorax, and abdomen with associated internal morphology. (B) Salivary gland. (C) Intracellular ultrastructure of salivary gland. LL, lateral lobe; HT, Malpighian tubules; SD, salivary duct; T, testes. See Figure 3 for common abbreviations. 19 tissues. More delicate organs, such as neural ganglia and salivary glands, were structurally intact and very easy to locate. In addition, intracellular ultrastructure was well preserved as evidenced by the acinous salivary gland cells (Figs. 3c and 4c). DISCUSSION These results are especially significant for S. acutus which underwent the relatively rigorous treatment of critical point drying. Although organ and intracellular ultrastructure were not affected, de- hydration and critical point drying did result in clearing out the specimen. This was due to the removal of most, if not all, of the hemolymph from body cavities by the ethanol dehydration. The sections of M. fascifrons showed the effects of ice crystal formation during refreezing and lyophilization as evidenced by the voids in the salivary glands (Fig. 4b). In addition, the entire inter- nal morphology was less discernable due to the presence of hemolymph in the body cavities. While lyophilized sections are adequate for gross morphology, zit appears that dehydrated and critical point dried sec- tions are preferable for more detailed analyses, making this handling technique particularly useful for such fragile specimens. The method of sectioning and handling the subsequently fragile sections described here is an effective technique that overcomes sever- al problems encountered when processing sectioned specimens for the scanning electron microscope. It offers the ability to section in the desired plane, as well as to obtain multiple and reproducible sections from the same specimen. The cost of materials is insignificant and no specialized equipment is necessary prior to the drying stage. 20 Moreover, it is possible to process the sandwiched sections through other procedures before drying, e.g., substrate- or antibody-specific labelling with substances detectable in X-ray and/or backscatter analyses. Several things should be kept in mind when attempting to section specimens with this method. Do not totally cover the specimen with Tissue-TekR as this will prevent selecting the desired sectioning plane. Keep the sections: 1) frozen on the sectioning stage while sectioning a specimen, or 2) moist on the tissue paper once sectioning is completed. Even partial air drying can badly distort delicate tis- sues. The 1eafhoppers used in this work ranged from 3 to 6 mm long but there is no 3 priori reason why this technique would not work equally well on larger or smaller specimens of any tissue type. LITERATURE CITED Dobroscky; I.D. 1929. 'Is the aster-yellows virus detectable in its insect vector? Phytopathology 19: 1009-1015. Dobroscky, I.D. 1931. Morphological and cytological studies on the salivary glands and alimentary tract of Cicadula sexnotata (Fallen), the carrier of aster yellows virus. Contrib. Boyce Thompson Inst. 3: 39-58. Doi, R. 1970. Studies on the mode of deveIOpment of Japanese encephalitis virus in some groups of mosquitoes by the fluorescent antibody technique. Jpn. J. Exp. Med. 40: 101-115. Doi, R., A. Shirasaka, and M. Sasa. 1967. The mode of development of Japanese encephalitis virus 111 the mosquito Sglgg tritaeniorhynchus summorosus as observed by the fluorescent antibody technique. Jpn. J. Exp. Med. 37: 227-238. Gil-Fernandez, C. and L.M. Black. 1965. Some aspects of the internal anatomy of the leathpper Agallia constricta (Homeptera: Cicadellidae). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Amer. 58: 275-284. Hemming, F.J., P. Mesguich, G. Morel, and P.M. Dubois. 1983. Cryoultramicrotomy versus plastic embedding: Comparative immunocytochemistry of rat anterior pituitary cells. .J. Micros. 131: 25-34. Liu, H.-Y., D.J. Gumpf, G.N. Oldfield, E.C. Calavan. 1983. The relationship of SpirOplasma citri and Circulifer tenellus. PhytOpathology 73: 585-590. Nuorteva, P. 1956. Notes on the anatomy of the salivary glands and on the occurrence of proteases in these organs in some leafhoppers (Hom., Auchenorrhyncha). Suomen Hyon. Aikakausk. 22: 103-108. Postek, M.T., K.S. Howard, A.H. Johnson, and R.L. McMichael. 1980. Scanning Electron Microsc0py. A Student's Handbook. Ladd Research Industries. Burlington, VT. 305 pp. Raine, .1. and A.R. Fbrbes. 1971. The salivary syringe of the leafhopper Macrosteles fascifrons (Homoptera: Cicadellidae) and the occurrence of myc0p1asma-like organisms in its ducts. Can. Entomol. 103: 110-116. Raine, J., A.R. Forbes, and F.E. Skelton. 1976. Myc0plasma-like bodies, rickettsia-like bodies, and salivary bodies in the salivary glands and saliva of the leafhopper Macrosteles fascifrons (HomOptera: Cicadellidae). Can. Entomol. 108: 1009- 1019. 21 22 Sinha, R.C. and L.N. Chiykowski. 1967. Multiplication of aster yellows virus in a nonvector leathpper. Virology 31: 461-466. Sogawa, R5 1965.' Studies of the salivary glands of rice leafhoppers I. Morphology'and histology. Jpn. J. Appl. Entomol. 2001. 9: 275-302. GAPTERII EFFECTS OF GLUTARALDEHYDE FIXATION ON SURFACE AND OVERALL ANTIGENICITY OP SPIROPLASMA CITRI 23 INTRODUCTION Spiroplasmas have been subjected to several immunological investi- gations. The enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) has been applied to the detection of both Spiroplasma citri and the corn stunt spiroplasma (CSS) in plant and insect hosts (Bové et al. 1979; Clark et a1. 1978; Raju and Nyland 1981; Saillard et al. 1978). The metabolism inhibition (MI) test, which measures the acidic metabolites released into the culture medium, omiginally developed to measure antibody to mycoplasmas (Taylor-Robinson et al. 1966) has been applied to spiro- plasmas for the same purpose (Williamson et al. 1979). A new tech- nique, the spiroplasma deformation (DF) test, which assesses the mor- phological effects of antibody binding, was deve10ped exclusively for the study of spiroplasmas (Williamson et al. 1978). Both the MI and DF tests have been used in combination to assess relationships among the many strains of spiroplasmas (Davis et al. 1979; Williamson et al. 1979). From this has arisen the concept of the serogroup for separat- ing the spiroplasmas serologically and at least six serogroups contain- ing 24 strains are currently recognized (Whitcomb 1980). Relatively little is known about the antigenic prOperties of the cell membrane of spirOplasmas. Most, if not all, of the antigens com- mon to the various serogroups are thought to be cytoplasmic (Whitcomb 1980). For many animal mchplasmas, membrane proteins are the primary cell antigens, although membrane lipids, in the form of glycolipids, also elicit immune responses (Razin et al. 1972). Many important anti- gens of plasma membranes are glyc0proteins. The membrane of S. 53523; contains approximately 2% carbohydrate (Razin et al. 1973) and most of 24 25 this is probably bound to proteins (Bové and Saillard 1979). This, coupled with the fact that the membrane is also about 48% protein, sug- gests that the surface of S. 51351 is highly antigenic. Immunological methods offer the most efficient and sensitive means of investigating spiroplasmas within their hosts. In fact, some sort of specific label.is necessary to examine spiroplasmas within.their leathpper vectors as helical morphology is not always expressed in these hosts (Whitcomb and Williamson 1975). While undoubtedly correct in their conclusions, Liu et al. (1983) offered only circumstantial evidence that the microorganism identified within Circulifer tenellus (Baker) was S. EEEEE' When sectioned leafhoppers are subjected to scanning electron microscopy (as described in Chapter 1) in order to detect spiroplasma infection, a specific label is indispensable as non- helical cells would be indistinguishable from numerous other particles within the specimen. Antibodies conjugated to various substances are generally the labels of choice. Detection and localization of spiroplasmas within their leafhopper vectors requires chemical fixation for at least two reasons. First, the morphological integrity of the host must be preserved in order to locate and identify infected tissues. Second, the spatial distribution of the spiroplasma must remain unchanged during the preparation of the specimen for examination. Because glutaraldehyde fixation fulfills the first requirement, it is reasonable to assume that the second will be met as well. Caution must be exercized when using immunological labels as glutaraldehyde fixation often reduces or destroys antigenicity (Van Ewijk et a1. 1980). Virtually no information exists regarding the an- tigenic response of spiroplasmas to glutaraldehyde fixation. It was 26 necessary to investigate this before attempting to label S. citri within its vector, Macrosteles fascifrons (Stal). MATERIALS AND METHODS SpirOplaama Culture The horseradish brittle root isolate of Spiroplasma citri was ob- tained from Dr. C.E. Eastman, Illinois Natural History Survey, univer- sity of Illinois, Champaign, Illinois. It was the sixth clone in the 20th passage and designated BR6-P20. The spiroplaana was cultured aer- obically in LD8 medium (Lee and Davis 1984) at 31-32 C. Phenol red was added to the medium to monitor growth and only log phase cultures were used, assumed to be when the color of the medium just changed to yellow. Antiserum Production Antigen was prepared by distributing 2000 ml of log phase BR6-P23 into 250 ml bottles and centrifuging at 16,000g for 60 min. The pel- lets from eight bottles were each resuspended in 10 ml phosphate buff- ered saline (PBS; 0.01M sodium phosphate + 0.15M NaCl, pH 7.4) and two suspensions were pooled in each of four 40 ml centrifuge tubes. The tubes were kept overnight at 4 C. An additional 10 m1 of PBS was added to each tube and all were centrifuged at 15,000g for 30 min. The pel- lets were resuspended in 5 ml PBS each, pooled, and sonicated for 30 sec using a Blackstone Ultrasonic generator fully tuned at 25% power. Total protein was assayed by the method of Lowry et al. (1951) and the antigen was stored in 1 ml aliquots at -25 C. A New Zealand White rabbit was ear-bled for 10 ml blood as a 27 nonspecific serum source. After bleeding, the rabbit was ether anes- thetized and injected with BR6-P23 antigen. Two ml antigen consisting of approximately 14 mg protein was emulsified with 2 ml Freund’s com- plete adjuvant and injected at four intramuscular hip and two subcutan- eous back locations. Three weeks later, the rabbit was boosted in the same manner except the back injections were omitted. One week follow- ing the first boost, the rabbit was ear bled for 50 ml of blood. At 6 and 7 weeks following this first bleeding, the rabbit was again given the same booster injections. At 10 and 19 days after the final boost, the rabbit was ear bled for 50 ml of blood. The blood from each bleeding was kept at room temperature for 60 min to allow clot formation and then held overnight at 4 C to shrink the clot. The serum was decanted and centrifuged at 5000g for 30 min to remove cellular debris. The clarified serum was passed through a 0.22 pm filter, aliquoted, and stored frozen at -25 C. All antisera were titered using the MI test (Williamson et al. 1979) performed in microtiter plates. A log phase culture of BR6-P23 was used as antigen and LD8 medium was used to make all antiserum and antigen dilutions. A 1:81 dilution of antiserum and the following di- lutions of antigen were prepared: 1:2, 1:4, 10-1, 10'2, 10'3, 10‘4, and 10'5. One hundred pl of LD8 medium was added to all wells in columns 1 through 9, 11 and 12. One hundred fifty pl was added to the wells in column 10 and these were used as medium control wells. To all wells in column 1, rows A through H, 50 pl of the 1:81 antiserum dilu- tion was added, producing a 1:243 dilution in the first well of each row. Threefold dilutions of antiserum were made by serially transfer- ring 50 pl across each row through column 9, but not columns 10, 11, 28 and 12. The 50 pl to be transferred out of the wells in column 9 was discarded, leaving 100 pl in all wells of the plate except those in column 10. A 50 pl amount of each antigen dilution, one dilution for each row, was added to wells 1 through 9, 11, and 12. Columns 11 and 12 were, therefore, antiserum-free and served as antigen control wells. At this point, a fresh vial of guinea pig complement (GIBCO, Inc.) was rehydrated with PBS and an 8% solution prepared by mixing 0.8 ml com- plement and 9.2 ml LD8 medium. This solution was passed through a 0.45 pm filter and 50 pl was added to all wells in the plate. The plate was incubated at 31-32 C and read for a color change from red to yellow for up to 8 days. The metabolism inhibition titer was expressed as the highest antiserum dilution to prevent a color change at the highest antigen dilution that produced a color change in the control wells. The IgG fraction was purified from the highest titer antiserum by ammonium sulfate precipitation and DEAE-SephacelR chromatography. Half strength PBS was used to dilute 3.4 ml of antiserum to 10 ml and 10 ml saturated ammonium sulfate was added. The mixture was gently stirred for 60 min at room temperature and the precipitate was collected by centrifugation at 5000g for 15 min. The precipitate was dissolved in 10 ml 1/2X PBS and the precipitation repeated twice more. The final precipitate was dissolved in 2 m1 l/2X PBS and passed through a Sepha- dexR G-25 column equilibrated in 1/2X PBS to remove ammonium sulfate. After the void volume, 2.8 ml was collected and this was passed through a DEAE-SephadexR column. The first 24, 1 ml fractions were pooled and sufficient 1/2X PBS was added to bring the absorbance at 280 nm to 1.4 (91 mg/ml). The purified IgG was aliquoted into 1 ml portions and stored at -25 C. 29 Preparation of Colloidal Gold-IgG Conjugate The gold colloid was prepared by a modification of the method of Frens (1973). To 500 ml of boiling 0.01% (w/v) HAuCl4 was added 12.5 ml of 11 N33C6H807 and the mixture was refluxed for 30 min. The color of the colloid changed from an initial pale yellow to deep blue-black to red-orange, indicating the reaction endpoint, within 5 min. The additional reflux time insured the reaction reached 100% so as to pre- vent unnecessary flocculation. The colloid was allowed to cool and stored at 4 C. This procedure produced a colloid with an average par- ticle size of 18 nm. Conjugation of the gold colloid to purified rabbit IgG was per- formed at pH 7.6 (Geoghegan and Ackerman 1977). A pH curve was con- structed by placing 6.5 ml of the gold colloid in a 10 ml beaker and measuring the pH after successive additions of 5 pl 0.2M K2C03 (Figure 1). From this, it was determined that 5.4 pl of 0.2M K2003 per ml of colloid was necessary to bring the pH to 7.6. The Optimum amount of IgG necessary to stabilize the gold colloid during conjugation was determined by constructing an IgG absorption isotherm using a variation of the method of Geoghegan and Ackerman (1977). An aliquot of purified IgG was passed through a SephadexR column equilibrated in distilled-deionized-distilled water (3D-H20) to remove salts that would cause flocculation of the gold. To 11 , 2 ml portions of the gold colloid, at pH 7.6, was added the following,pg amounts of desalted IgG: 0, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, and 40. After 1 minute, 0.2 ml of 10% (w/v) NaCl was added which causes unsta- bilized gold colloids to flocculate, indicated by a blue color. The absorbance at 580 nm was plotted against the amount of IgG added 30 1 0.0 jr 1 ' V I ‘i 1 ‘ T ‘ 5.0 l l l 1 l l l l l o 10 20 3b 40 so pl 0.2M choa/as ml Colloidal Gold Figure II-1.--pH isotherm for the gold colloid produced by the sodium citrate method (see text). From this curve, it was determined that 5.4 pl of 0.2M K2c03 per ml colloidal gold was necessary to bring the pH to 7.6. 31 (Figure 2) and the amount of IgG necessary to stabilize the colloid was determined from where the curve becomes asymptotic to the abscissa. To assure complete stabilization, 10 pg IgG/ml gold colloid was used for conjugation. Approximately 225 ml of gold colloid was centrifuged at 500g for 15 min to remove aggregates and 210 ml of the supernatant was trans- ferred to a beaker for conjugation to IgG. Using desalted IgG, 2.1 mg in 3.1 ml was added with gentle stirring. After 2 min, 2 ml of 1% (w/v) polyethelene glycol (PEG; MW=20,000) was added to further stabi- lize the conjugate. After a further 1 min of mixing, the conjugate was centrifuged at 13,500g for 35 min. The very loose pellet was saved in about 1 ml of the supernatant and resuspended in PPP buffer (0.01M so- dium phosphate + 4% [w/v] polyvinylpyrrolidone + 0.2 mg/ml PEG). The conjugate was passed through a 0.22 pm filter, brought to 40 ml with PPP buffer, and stored at 4 C. Prior to every use, the conjugate was centrifuged at 500g for 15 min to remove aggregates. Fixation of Sjiroplas-a citri Glutaraldehyde concentrations of 7.0, 6.0, 5.0, 4.0, 3.0, 2.0, 1.0, 0.5, 0.2, and 0.0% (v/v) were prepared in 7% (w/v) sorbitol (to maintain prOper osmolality). To 15 ml portions of log phase BR6-P24 was added an equal amount of fixative producing final concentrations of 3.5, 3.0, 2.5, 2.0, 1.5, 1.0, 0.5, 0.25, 0.1, and 0.0%. These were incubated at room temperature for 60 min followed by centrifugation at 15,000g for 20 min. The pellets were resuspended in 10 ml 0.1M NH4CI in PBS and incubated at room temperature for 30 min to block any free glutaraldehyde reactive groups. Ten ml of PBS was added and the tubes 32 0.6 - 0 0 5 L E 2 0.2 » b 0 a 16 24 52 1 40 pg IgG/2 ml Colloidal Gold Figure II-2.--IgG absorption isotherm for the gold colloid produced by the sodium citrate method (see text). From this curve, it was determined that 10 pg of IgG per ml colloidal gold would safely stabilize the colloid. 33 recentrifuged as above. The pellets were resuspended in PPP buffer for colloidal gold labelling or PBS for ELISA. Colloidal Gold Labelling Fixed spiroplasmas in PPP buffer were centrifuged at 15,000g for 20 min in a swinging bucket rotor. The pellets were resuspended in 0.5 m1 PPP buffer, 0.5 m1 of colloidal gold-IgG conjugate previously dilu- ted 1:4 added, and the tubes incubated at room temperature for 30 min. A drop of this reaction mixture was placed directly on parlodion-coated copper grids and allowed to stand for 30 min at 31 C and 100% relative humidity. Excess fluid was drawn off, the grids allowed to air dry, and negatively stained with 2% (w/v) ammonium molybdate adjusted to pH 7.5. All grids were examined in a Philips 201 transmission electron microscope at 60 kV. In some cases, a drop of the reaction mixture was placed on highly polished carbon planchets, incubated, and dried as above. After attaching,the planchets to aluminum stubs with Tube- coatR, they were examined in a JEOL JSM 35C scanning electron micro- scope at 20 kV in both secondary and backscatter electron modes. The secondary electron mode produces the topographical images normally as- sociated with scanning electron microscopy. The backscatter electron mode produces images based upon the molecular weight differences of the elements that comprise the specimen. Unfixed spiroplasmas were also labelled with colloidal gold. A portion of the colloidal gold-IgG conjugate was diluted 1:4 and brought to 7% (w/v) with solid sorbitol. Equal volumes of this reagent and log phase BR6-P24 were mixed, incubated at room temperature for 60 min, and applied to grids as above. Negative staining was accomplished using 2% (w/v) ammonium molybdate in 3.5% (w/v) sorbitol adjusted to pH 7.5. 34 The sorbitol was included to maintain osmolality and prevent gross mor- phological changes and/or cell lysis. To assess the specificity of the colloidal gold label, fixed spi- roplasmas were treated with free IgG preparations prior to labelling. After blocking free aldehyde groups with 0.1M NH401, spiroplasmas fixed in 3.5% glutaraldehyde concentrations were made to 25, 20, 15, 10, 5, 1, 0.5, 0.1, 0.05, 0.01, 0.005, and 0.001 pg/ml with nonspecific, puri- fied from preimmune serum, and specific IgG in 1/2X PBS. After incuba- tion at 37 C for 4 hrs, 10 ml of 1/2X PBS was added and the mixtures were centrifuged at 15,000g in a swinging bucket rotor. Labelling was then performed as above. Pretreatment with 1/2X PBS alone was used as a control. As additional controls, spirOplasmas fixed in 3.5% (v/v) glutaraldehyde were subjected to attempted labelling with unconjugated gold particles and also with a goat anti-rabbit IgG-colloidal gold con- jugate. Finally, an attempt was made to label sheep red blood cells fixed in 3.5% (w/v) glutaraldehyde with the S. ESEES-specific colloidal gold-IgG conjugate produced here. Enzyme-linked Inmunosorbent Assay (ELISA) The double antibody sandwich ELISA described by Clark and Adams (1977) was used to measure the overall antigenic response of S. SEEEA to glutaraldehyde fixation. Fixed spiroplasmas from 10 ml of culture were suspended in 2 ml of PBS and sonicated for 30 seconds as above. Total protein was assayed by the method of Lowry et al. (1951) and, for ELISA testing, dilutions of 1:10, 1:50, 1:100, 1:500, and 1:1000 were made. Spiroplasmas subjected to the entire fixation procedure, but without glutaraldehydeg and those prepared directly from culture were 35 used as controls. An alkaline phosphatase-IgG conjugate was prepared by mixing 0.8 ml (= 4.4 mg) of the enzyme (Sigma Type VII-S) with 1.8 ml (8 1.8 mg) of S. SEES-specific IgG. This mixture was dialyzed three times against 1000 ml of PBS, twice for 60 min and once overnight, at 4 C. The dialysate (1.85 ml) was made to 0.06% with glutaraldehyde and allowed to stand at room temperature for 4 hrs. The conjugate was di- alyzed as above to remove excess glutaraldehyde, solid bovine serum albumin added to 5 mg/ml, and stored at 4 C. For use, the conjugate was diluted 1:1000 with conjugate buffer (PBS + 2% [w/v] polyvinylpyr- rolidone + 0.2% [w/v] ovalbumin, pH 7.4). Coating IgG was prepared by diluting S. citri-specific IgG to 1 pg/ml with coating buffer (15mM Na2C03 + 35mM NaHCO3 + 0.02% [w/v] NaN3: pH 9-6)- ELISA was performed by first adding 200 p1 of coating IgG to the wells of microtiter plates and incubating for 4 hrs at 37 C. The plates were washed three times for 3 min each with PBS-Tween (PBS + 0.05% [v/v] Tween-20, pH 7.4). After shaking the plates dry, 200 pl of the various fixed, sonicated, and diluted spiroplasma preparations were added to appropriate wells and incubated overnight at 4 C. The plates were washed, as above, and 200 pl of conjugate was added to all wells followed by incubation for 4 hrs at 37 C. After a final washing, 200 pl of p-nitrophenyl phosphate at 1 mg/ml in substrate buffer (9.7% [v/v] diethanolamine + 0.02% [w/v] NaN3: PH 9-8) was added and the plates incubated for 30 min at room temperature. The reaction was stOpped by adding 50 pl of 3M NaOH and the absorbance read at 405 nm. RESUETS The effects of glutaraldehyde fixation on morphology and surface labelling of S. glggi are presented in Figure 3. At all fixative con- centrations, helical morphology was preserved and cell lysis or "bleb" formation was prevented. No quantitative difference in gold labelling was visually detected at any glutaraldehyde concentration. The gold particles were distributed randomly over the entire surface of the cells, with only limited patchiness. Colloidal gold-labelled S. 51351 was observed in the scanning electron microsc0pe (Figure 4). .Although visible in the micrographs, spiroplasmas were invisible on the CRT screen of the microscope when in secondary electron mode. SpirOplasmas were found by searching the car- bon planchets in backscatter electron mode. unfixed spiroplasmas lost helical morphology even under the mild conditions used for gold labelling and negative staining (Figure 5). Cells often remained filamentous, but blebs were always present. The gold particles were always clustered in the bleb area of the cell with none of the filaments showing any label. S. SEES-specific IgG applied before the colloidal gold blocked labelling, but nonspecific IgG did.not (Figure 6). Below 5 pg/ml, little blocking was observed. Goat anti-rabbit IgG-colloidal gold con- jugate and unconjugated colloidal gold both failed to label S. gig; (Figure 7), nor did the S. ESEES-specific colloidal gold-IgG conjugate label the fixed sheep red blood cells (Figure 8). ELISA results showed that increasing glutaraldehyde concentration decreased overall antigenicity of S. 2135; (Table 1 and Figure 9). Above a fixed spirOplasma protein concentration of approximately 2.5 36 37 35 20 O5 Figure II—3.-—Transmission electron micrographs of the horseradish brittle root isolate of Spiroplasma citri fixed in various concentrations of glutaraldehyde and labelled with a specific colloidal gold—IgG conjugate. Cells were negatively stained with 2% ammonium molybdate. The number indicate the percent glutaraldehyde used for fixation. Bars are 1 pm. Figure II-4.-—Scanning electron micrographs of the horseradish brittle root isolate of Spiroplasma citri fixed in 3.5% glutar— aldehyde and labelled with a specific colloidal gold—IgG conjugate. The specimens are uncoated with B and D being the backscatter images of the secondary images A and C, respectively. Bars are l um. 39 Figure II-5.-—Transmission electron micrographs of the horseradish brittle root isolate of Spiroplasma citri unfixed and labelled with a specific colloidal gold-IgG conjugate. Cells were negatively stained with 2% ammonium molybdate. Bars are 1 pm. 4O .O5NS .OSS‘ . T' ,5 A 3% _ #4; -L .O1NS .013 .OO5NS .0053 001A} .0018 Figure II-6.--Transmission electron micrographs of the horseradish brittle root isolate of Spiroplasma citri fixed in 3.5% glutaraldehyde and pretreated with nonspecific and spec- ific IgG prior to labelling with a specific colloidal gold-IgG conjugate. Cells were negatively stained with 2% ammonium molybdate. Blocking of the colloidal gold label was attempted using the IgG concentrations shown, 25NS = 25 ug/ml nonspecific IgG, 258 = 25 ug/ml specific IgG, and so forth. Bars are 1 pm. 41 Figure II—7.-—Transmission electron micrographs of the horseradish brittle root isolate of Spiroplasma citri fixed in 3.5% glutaraldehyde prior to attempted labelling with a goat anti-rabbit colloidal gold conjugate (A) and unconjugated colloidal gold (B). Cells were negatively stained with 2% ammonium molybdate. Bars are 1 um. 42 Figure II-8.--Scanning electron micrographs of sheep red blood cells fixed in 2.0% glutaraldehyde prior to attempted labelling with a Spiroplasma citri-specific colloidal gold-IgG conjugate. Cells were carbon coated. Bars are 1 um. 43 Table II-1.--ELISA results for the horseradish brittle root isolate of Spiroplasma citri fixed in various concentrations of glutaraldehyde. Absorbancea at 405 nm Percent for_given protein concentration (pg/ml) Glutaraldehyde 25 5.0 2.5 0.5 0.25 3.5 1.47(.05) 0.54(.04) 0.33(.02) 0.12(.01) 0.09(.01) 3.0 1.53(.07) 0.58(.05) 0.36(.02) 0.12(.01) 0.09(.01) 2.5 1.58(.10) 0.63(.03) 0.37(.03) 0.12(.01) 0.09(.01) 2.0 1.68(.04) 0.73(.03) 0.46(.02) 0.14(.01) 0.10(.00) 1.5 1.73(.04) 0.76(.05) 0.50(.02) 0.15(.02) 0.11(.01) 1.0 1.77(.02) 0.93(.09) 0.60(.02) 0.18(.01) 0.12(.00) 0.5 1.81(.02) 1.39(.08) 0.94(.05) 0.27(.01) 0.18(.02) 0.25 1.80(.02) 1.71(.04) 1.32(.04) 0.40(.05) 0.24(.01) 0.10 1.79(.02) 1.81(.03) 1.75(.04) 0.68(.03) 0.39(.04) 0.0 1.79(.03) 1.80(.03) 1.81(.02) 1.79(.01) 1.73(.02) aMean (and standard deviation) of 4 wells from 4 different plates. 44 E g 1.2 P 4 O 3.. O P -l 0 C G ‘9 o 0.8 ' ‘ C) .D < 1 F 4 0.4 - - 0 0.5 1.0 115 2.0 2.5 an 3.5 96 Glutaraldehyde Figure II-9.--Effects of glutaraldehyde fixation on the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for the horseradish brittle root isolate of SpirOplasma citri. Shown are the results for 25 pg/ml (O——O) and 0.5 pg/ml (O-—-O) spiroplasma protein. 45 pg/ml, S. g_i_t_1;i antigens produced strong ELISA reactions at all fixa- tive concentrations. At 0.25 pg/ml, the lowest protein concentration to produce a maximum ELISA response with the unfixed preparation, fixed S. citri antigens were undetectable above 1% glutaraldehyde. DISCUSSION These results demonstrate that the colloidal gold labelling of S. SEEEA was specific and not due to residual reactivity of glutaraldehyde in fixed preparations. This, and the fact that the colloidal gold did not label sheep red blood cell membranes, indicates that spirOplasmas may be detected within glutaraldehyde-fixed complex host tissues with- out extensive background labelling due to the fixative. Mbre impor- tant, however, is the maintenance of surface antigenicity at all glut- araldehyde concentrations as this fixative often destroys cell surface immunoreactivity at concentrations higher than 0.1% (Van Ewijk et al. 1980). Accurate localization of S. gigs; within its leafhopper vectors depends upon good fixation of the host tissues and, apparently, the spiroplasma can withstand this relatively harsh treatment. Glutaraldehyde fixation and colloidal gold labelling have revealed certain properties of the S. 21551 membrane. The fixed cells (Figure 3)showed surface antigens to be numerous and distributed over the en- tire plasma membrane. The unfixed cells (Figure 5) demonstrated that the surface antigens are mobile in the membrane as antibody binding caused a capping phenomenon characteristic of many mammalian cells (Eisen 1980). Indeed, this may be the basis of the spiroplasma defor- mation test described by Williamson et al. (1978). In any event, these membrane properties have great importance if ligand-receptor mechanisms 46 are the means of spiroplasma invasion of host cells, as ubiquity and mobility of the ligand would facilitate binding of the host cell recep- tor. This antigen mobility undoubtedly plays a role in the change in morphology of S. 2123; within different hosts. ELISA revealed that surface antigenicity is only a small part of the overall antigenic makeup of S. 31331. This is supported by the fact that even when undetectable with ELISA, surface labelling was un- diminished. Apparently, glutaraldehyde can pass across the plasma mem- brane to attack cytoplasmic antigens, which are much more sensitive to the fixative as they are not protected by being embedded in the mem- brane. This antigenic disparity is important in the preparation of antisera to spiroplasmas. If intended for use in simply detecting spi- roplasmas, e.g., with ELISA, then antigen should be prepared for injec- tion so as to insure presentation of cyt0plasmic antigens, even though this may reduce the immunogenicity of membrane antigens. Samples to be tested should be prepared to expose cytoplasmic spiroplasma antigens to the test antiserum. I earlier found that sonication of test samples more than.doubled the resulting ELISA.reactions, apparently because cytoplasmic antigens were released (Mowry 1982). In conclusion, these experiments demonstrate that glutaraldehyde- fixed S. ElELi. remains surface immunoreactive despite a predictable decline in overall antigenicity. This fortuitous result makes it pos- sible to detect S. Ei££1.13 fixed host tissues using immunological methods, specifically colloidal gold labelling. My preliminary experi- mentation has indicated that the S. ESEES-specific colloidal gold label does not bind nonspecifically'to leafhopper tissues prepared by the method described in Chapter I. The task at hand is to combine these 47 two techniques for the detection of spiroplasma plant pathogens within their leafhopper vectors to identify sites of and barriers to infection (see General Conclusion). LITERATURE CITED Bové, J.M., G. Moutous, C. Saillard, A. Fos, J. Bonfils, J.-C. Vignault, A. Nhami, M. Abassi, K. Kabbage, B. Hafidi, C. Mouches, and G. Viennot-Bourgin. 1979. Mise en évidence de SpirOplasma citri, l'agent causal de la maladie du (stubborn) des agrumes dans 7 cicadelles du Maroc. C.R. Acad. Sci. Ser. D 288: 335-338. Bové, J.M. and C. Saillard. 1979. Cell biology of spiroplasmas. Pp. 83-153 in: The Myc0plasmas, Vol. III. R.F. Whitcomb and J.G. Tully, eds. Academic Press, New York. 351 pp. Clark, H.F. and A.N. Adams. 1977. Characteristics of the microplate method of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for the detection of plant viruses. J. Gen. Virol. 34: 475-483. Clark, H.F., C.L. Flegg, M. Bar-Joseph, and S. Rottem. 1978. The detection of Spiroplasma citri by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Phytopathol. Z. 92: 332-337. Davis, R.E., I.-M. Lee, and L.R. Basciano. 1979. Spiroplasmas: Serological grouping of strains associated with plants and insects. Can. J. Microbiol. 25: 861-866. Eisen, H.N. 1980. Immunology. Harper and Row, Philadelphia. 547 pp. Frens, G. 1973. Controlled nucleation for the regulation of the particle size in monodisperse gold suspensions. Nature Phys. Sci. 241: 20-22. Geoghegan, W.D. and G.A. Ackerman. 1977. Adsorption of horseradish peroxidase, ovomucoid and anti-immunoglobulin to colloidal gold for the indirect detection of concanavalin A, wheat germ agglutinin and goat anti-human immunoglobulin G on cell surfaces at the electron microscope level: A new method, theory and application. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 25: 1187-1200. Lee, I.-M. and R.E. Davis. 1984. New media for rapid growth of Spiroplasma citri and corn stunt spiroplasma. PhytOpathology 74: 84-89. Liu, H.-Y., D.J. Gumpf, G.N. Oldfield, and E.C. Calavan. 1983. The relationship of Spiroplasma citri and Circulifer tenellus. Phytopathology 73: 585-590. 3Lowry, O.H., N.J. Rosebrough, A.L. Farr, and.R.J. Randall. 1951. Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent. J. Biol. Chem. 193: 265-275. 48 49 Mowry, T.M. 1982. Leafhopper sampling in Michigan peach orchards and serological detection of a spiroplasma associated with X-disease in plant and insect tissue. Master's Thesis, Mich. St. Univ., East Lansing. 134 pp. Raju, E.C. and G. Nyland. 1981. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for the detection of corn stunt spiroplasma in plant and insect tissue. Curr. Microbiol. 5: 101-104. Razin, S., M. Hasin, Z. Ne’eman, and S. Rottem. 1973. Isolation, chemical composition, and ultrastructural features of the cell membrane of the mycoplasma-like organism Spir0plasma citri. J. Bacteriol. 116: 1421-1435. Razin, 8., IL. Kahane, and J. Kovartovsky. 1972. Immunochemistry of mchplasna membranes. Pp. 93-122 in: Pathogenic Myc0plasmas. A. Ciba Foundation Symposium. Associated Scientific Publishers, Amsterdam. 404 pp. Saillard, C., J. Dunez, O. Garcia-Jurado, A. Nhami, and J. Bové. 1978. Détection de Spiroplasma citri dans les agrumes et les pervenches par la technique immuno-enzymatique (ELISA). C.R. Acad. Sci. Ser. D 286: 1245-1248. Taylor-Robinson, D., R.H. Purcell, D.C. Wong, and R.M. Chanock. 1966. A colour test for the measurement of antibody to certain mycoplasma species based upon the inhibition of acid production. J. Hyg. 64: 91-104. Van Ewijk, W., R.C. Coffman, and I.L. Weissman. 1980. Immunoelectron microscopy of cell surface antigens: A quantitative analysis of antibody binding after different fixation protocols. Histochem. J. 12: 349-361. Whitcomb, R.F. 1980. The genus Spiroplasma. Ann. Rev. Microbiol. 34: 677-709. Whitcomb, R.F. and D.L. Williamson. 1975. Helical wall-free prokaryotes in insects: Multiplication and pathogenicity. Ann. Williamson, D.L., J.G. Tully, and R.F. Whitcomb. 1979. Serological relationships of spiroplasmas as shown by combined deformation and metabolism inhibition tests. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 29: 345- 351. Williamson, D.L., R.F. Whitcomb, and J.G. Tully. 1978. The spiroplasma deformation test, a new serological method. Curr. Microbiol. 1: 203-207. cam III EFFECTS OF IN VITRO PASSAGE ON THE PLASMA MEMBRANE AND TRANSMISSION OF SPIROPLASMA CIEI 50 INTRODUCTION The discovery that mchplasmalike organisms were the possible etiological agents of several yellows-type plant diseases (Doi et al. 1967) initiated an intensive search for presumptive mchplasmas causing diseases for which no pathogen had yet been found (Whitcomb and Black 1982). This resulted in the isolation and fulfilling of Koch’s postu- lates for two plant pathogenic mchplasmas, the corn stunt spiroplasma (Chen and Liao 1975; Williamson and Whitcomb 1975) and Spiroplasma giggi (Markham et al. 1974). At that time, leafhoppers were the only known vectors of the yellows disease pathogens. Another search, which still continues, began for the leafhoppers responsible for transmitting plant spiroplasmas. Only four leafhoppers are currently known to transmit S. REESE from plant to plant. These are Scaphytopius nitridus (DeLong) (Kaloostian et al. 1976) , S. acutus delongl Young (Kaloostian et al. 1979), Circulifer tenellus (Baker) (Kaloostian et al. 1976; 1979; Oldfield et al. 1976; Liu et al. 1983a), and Macrosteles fascifrons (Stal) (O’Hayer et al. 1983). Two other leafhoppers, Euscelidius variegatus (Kirsch) and Euscelis plebejus (Fallén), have been shown to be experimental vectors, i.e., the pathogen is acquired by injection (Markham et al. 1974; Markham and Townsend 1979). S. SiEEl was detect- ed by the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) in seven other field-collected leafhoppers (Bové et al. 1979). In membrane feeding experiments, four additional leafhoppers and one membracid were able to acquire, but not transmit, S. SE32 (Rana et a1. 1975). It appears that while a number of leafhoppers may be capable of acquiring and 51 52 maintaining the pathogen, a relatively few are able to transmit it to plants. S. 91531 is circulative and propagative in its leafhopper vector, S. tenellus (Liu et al. 1983a; 1983b). This means that the pathogen must pass through at least three tissue types before transmission can occur: gut epithelium, hemolymph, and salivary acini (Whitcomb 1981). This is certainly true for the other natural vectors of spiroplasmas. The mechanisms involved in this passage, especially across membranes, are largely unknown. Gildow (1985) demonstrated that barley yellow dwarf virus (BYDV) adsorbed specifically to the plasma membrane of hindgut epithelium in its aphid vector. This initiated coated pit de- velopment and eventual endocytosis of the virion within a coated vesi- cle. Gildow postulated that specific adsorption of BYDV to gut epithe- lium may account for the specificity of virus transmission among aphids. Liu (1983b) observed S. ElEEl partially embedded in the wall of gut epithelial cells and within "vesicles" between the epithelium and the basement.membrane. This spiroplasma.has also been observed within vesicles inside cells of monolayer cell culture (Markham 1982). These reports all argue for receptor-mediated endocytosis as a mechan- isnlof leafhopper infection, particularly'in light of the fact that coated pits, which are clusters of receptors, form in response to bind- ing of receptors by ligands on the invading particle (Willingham and Pastan 1983). It has been suggested that spiroplasmas pass between the cells of gut epithelium and salivary acini via the cell junctions as they have been observed in these locations (Markham 1982). This does not, however, account for the multiplication of spiroplasmas in the cells of these organs and may reflect an inadvertant deposition of the 53 pathogen. In any event, phytOpathogenic spiroplasmas do enter the cells of their insect vectors and it would appear that the mechanisms involved are both molecular and specific. The phytopathology of S. 2133; is not well understood, but is gen- erally felt to arise from a toxin produced by the pathogen. The major acidic metabolite of S. 5155; is lactic acid (Hawthorne and Vandemark 1977), but it is probably not involved pathologically at the concentra- tions normally encountered (Daniels 1979a). Two metabolites have ex- hibited phytotoxicity, one being neutral (Daniels and Meddins 1974) and the other acidic (Daniels 1979a). Both are low molecular weight sub- stances that are very unstable and, therefore, have not been isolated. How continuous l2 ygggg passage of S. ElEEl affects production of these toxins is unknown. The plasma membrane of S. SHEA has been fairly well character- ized. Gross analysis revealed that the membrane is about 30% lipid and 48% protein (Razin et al. 1973), by weight, with carbohydrates consti- tuting about 2.2% (Whitcomb 1980). ElectrOphoretic analysis has de- tected 16 membrane proteins (bands) of which spiralin is the dominant member, comprising approximately 22% of total membrane protein (Whit- comb 1980; Wroblewski et al. 1977). The metabolic and structural roles of these membrane proteins have not been determined, although spiralin may be involved in maintenance of spiral morphology as antispiralin antibodies deform the organism (Wroblewski 1978). The response of S. glggi to S3 XEEEB culture and passage may supply information about 13 1312 mechanisms of infection and survival. The adaptation of microorganisms to the culture environment often leads to the inability to complete their natural biological cycle or, in the 54 case of pathogens, the loss of pathogenicity (attenuation). By compar- ing modified and unmodified cultures, it is sometimes possible to detect macromolecular changes that may be involved in the lost function due to continuous culture. The purpose of this research was to assess the effects of $2 yiggg passage of S. 91531 related to its pathogenic- ity and/or transmissibility and to discover any concurrent macromolecu- lar changes in the plasma membrane. It was also an objective to pro- vide evidence for transmission barriers in the leafhopper vector. INATERIAleANDINETEODS Spiroplasma and Leafhopper Cultures The horseradish brittle root isolate of S. EEEEA was obtained from Dr. C.E. Eastman, Illinois Natural History Survey, University of Illi- nois, Champaign, Illinois. It was the sixth clone in the 20th passage and designated BR6-P20. The spiroplasma was cultured aerobically in LD8 medium (Lee and Davis 1984) at 30-31 C. The aster leafhopper, Macrosteles fascifrons (Stal), was used as the vector of S. citri. It was maintained on barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) in the greenhouse under a 16 hr day supplemented with fluorescent lights. Only adults of both sexes were used in these experiments. Passage and Injection of Spiroplasma citri Passage 24 was obtained by inoculating 1 ml of passage 23, thawed from frozen storage, into 99 ml of fresh LD8 medium. This was the starting point because it had been previously determined through leaf- luopper injection that passage 24 was as pathogenic as any earlier pas- sage. Each passage was initiated by inoculating 10 ml of the previous 55 passage in log phase growth into 90 ml fresh LD8 medium and culturing for 48 hrs. At the end of this time, a 10 ml aliquot was removed for leathpper injection. For each passage, approximately 100 leafhoppers were anesthetized with carbon dioxide and immobilized on an upside down glass Petri dish with Parafilm'MR stretched to the breaking point. Each insect was injected through the Parafilm with glass needles using an ISCOR microapplicator. The inoculum consisted of 0.1-0.2 pl of cul- ture containing the number of colony forming units (CFUs) listed in Table 1 and was injected between the ventral abdominal sclerites. Fresh LD8 medium was injected into approximately 100 leafhoppers as a control. After injection, leafhoppers were held for 14 days on asters (Callistephus chinensis Nees) cv. American Branching in a growth cham- ber under 16 hrs of fluorescent light per 24 hr period at 27-28 C. Following this incubation period, all surviving leafhoppers were trans- ferred individually to 4-5 wk old aster test plants for an inoculation access period of 7 days under the same light/temperature regime. Upon removal of the insects, the test plants were held in the greenhouse up to 10 wks for symptom development. Acquisition of Spiroplasma citri from Plants Mollicute-free adult leafhoppers were caged in groups of 50 on S. giEES-infected asters for 14 days in a growth chamber under the above conditions. Survivors were transferred to healthy asters for 7 days and then individually to 4-5 wk old aster test plants for an additional 7 days. After removing all insects, the test plants were held in the greenhouse up to 10 wks for symptom develOpment. 56 Table III-1.--Number of colony forming units (CFUs) of the horseradish brittle isolate of SpirOplasma citri injected into Macrosteles fascifrons. 0.1-0.2 pl of undiluted culture. Leafhoppers were injected with Values were obtained by plating 25 pl of appropriately diluted culture on solid LD8 medium and counting subsequent colonies. Passage No. CFUs/mla CFUs Injectedb 24 NBC NBC 25 4.9 x 109 4.9 x 105 - 9.9 105 26 6.9 x 109 6.9 x 105 - 1.4 106 27 9.1 x 109 9.1 x 105 - 1.8 106 28 1.5 x 109 1.5 x 105 - 2.9 105 29 1.9 x 1010 1.9 x 106 - 3.8 106 30 2.3 x 109 2.3 x 105 - 4.6 105 31 2.3 x 1011 2.3 x 107 - 4.6 107 32 2.3 x 1010 2.3 x 106 - 4.6 106 33 5.8 x 109 5.8 x 105 - 1.2 106 34 2.1 x 1011 2.1 x 107 - 4.2 107 35 2.6 x 109 2.6 x 105 - 5.2 105 8Mean of 3 plates. Values are for bIn 0.1-0.2 61. cNot done. undiluted cultures. 57 Isolation of Spiroplasmas All surviving leafhoppers from both injection and plant acquisi- tion experiments were frozen at -25 C. Injected insects were held fro- zen up to 5 wks and the plant-fed leathppers held overnight. Isola- tion of spiroplasmas from each individual leafhopper was performed using a modification of the method of Markham et al. (1983) . The in- sects were surface sterilized by immersion in 70% (v/v) ethanol for 2 min followed by two rinses in sterile distilled water. Each was then thoroughly ground in 2 ml LD8 medium. The homogenate was passed through a 0.45 pm filter into a sterile tube and incubated at 30-31 C for 4 wks. Spiroplasma isolation attempts were made from all test plants showing S. 21331 symptoms and some selected nonsymptomatic plants using a modification of the method of Bové et al. (1983). A 2 4cm piece of stem tissue was surface sterilized by immersion in 70% (v/v) ethanol for 2 min followed by 5 min in 1% (w/v) sodium hypochlorite. After three rinses in sterile distilled.water, the pieces were cut up and crushed in 3 ml LD8 medium and allowed to stand for 15 min at room temperature. The homogenate was filtered through a 0.45 pm filter into sterile tubes containing the necessary amount of LD8 medium to make both 1:4 and 1:20 dilutions of the original filtrate. The tubes were incubated at 30-31 C for up to 4 wks. Phytotoxin Assay For each passage of S. citri, phytotoxins were assayed using a modification of the method of Daniels (1979a). Newly Opened leaves of broad bean (Vicia faba L.) cv. Long Pod Fava were surface sterilized by immersion in 70% (v/v) ethanol followed by two rinses in sterile 58 distilled water. The leaves were placed upside down on sterile, wet gauze pads and.the lower epidermis removed with fine point forceps. Using a sterilized cork borer, 3 mm diameter pieces were cut from the leaves and floated, stripped side down, on the surface of sterile 2% (w/v) sorbitol until used (no more than 1 hr). From each passage, 12 ml of culture was centrifuged at 15,000g for 20 min, the supernatant transferred to a small beaker, and the pH mea- sured. The clarified culture supernatant was passed through a 0.22 pm filter and dilutions made aseptically with sterile 2% (w/v) sorbitol to produce supernatant concentrations of 100, 90, 80, 70, 60, 50, 40, 30, 20, and 10%. LD8 medium was made to 100, 50, and 10% for use as controls. Two ml of each dilution was placed in 30 X 10 mm culture dishes and two disks of prepared broad bean leaves were floated, stripped side down, on the surface of the fluid. The dishes were covered and incubated overnight at 37 C. The next morning, the diluted supernatants were aspirated off and the leaf disks washed twice in dis- tilled-deionized-distilled water (3D'H20). After removing as much water as possible, the leaf disks were extracted for 1 hr with 100% methanol followed by two washes in 3D-H20. The disks were appropriate- ly arranged on moist filter paper and photographed using Panatomic-XR negative film. Membrane Preparation Plasma membranes were isolated from log phase cultures of BR6-P26 and BR6-P34 using a modification of the method of Razin et al. (1973). One 1 of log phase culture was centrifuged at 15,000g for 40 min in 250 ml bottles. The pellets were resuspended in 10 ml 0.25M NaCl, 59 distributed into two 36 ml tubes and centrifuged at 15,000g for 20 min in a swinging bucket rotor, as were all subsequent centrifugations. The pellets were again resuspended in 10 ml 0.25M NaCl, held on ice, and sonicated three times for 30 sec each, with 30 sec intervals on ice, using 8 BlackstoneR Ultrasonic generator fully tuned at 25% power. The suspensions were transferred to new tubes, filled with 0.25M NaCl, and centrifuged at 34,000g for 30 min. The pellets were resuspended in 15 ml of 0.02M MgClz containing 10 pg/ml deoxyribonuclease (Sigma Type DN-25) warmed to 37 C and incubated for 15 min at 37 C. Fifteen m1 of 0.02M ug012 was added and the tubes centrifuged at 43,100g for 30 min. The membranes were alternately washed three times each with cold low strength phosphate buffered saline (PBS; 0.01M sodium phosphate + 0.05M N301: PH 7-5) and C01d 3D'H20. The final pellets were resuspended in about 5 ml PBS (0.01M sodium phosphate + 0.15M NaCl + 0.005M EDTA, pH 7.4). Total protein was measured with the method of Lowry et al. (1951) and the volume adjusted to a protein concentration of 1 mg/ml. The membranes were stored in 1 ml aliquots at -25 C until used. Membrane Electrophoresis Membranes were prepared for electrophoresis by centrifuging 2 ml (= 2 mg)lof purified material at 43,100g for 30 min and resuspending the pellet in 1 ml of sample buffer (0.0625M Tris-HCl, pH 6.8 + 10% [v/v] glycerol + 2% [w/v] SDS + 5% [v/v] 2-mercaptoethanol + 0.002% [w/v] bromophenol blue). This suspension was heated at 100 C for 3 min to completely denature all proteins. After cooling to room tempera- ture, 25 pl aliquots (= 50 pg total protein) were layered on the gel for analysis. Molecular weight standards (Sigma MW-SDS-200) were pre- pared and used in the same manner, except that 10 p1 was applied to the 60 gel. The standards were: carbonic anhydrase (MW 29,000), ovalbumin (MW 45,000), bovine serum albumin (MW 66,000), phosphorylase B (MW 97,400), B-galactosidase (MW 116,000), and myosin (MW 205,000). Sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrOphoresis (SDS- PAGE) was carried out in the discontinuous buffer system of Laemmli (1970). The resolving gel consisted of a 5-20% (w/v) acrylamide gradi- ent and a 1 cm stacking gel of 3.75% (w/v) acrylamide was used. Run- ning conditions were a constant current of 15 mA until the bromOphenol blue dye front reached the resolving gel (approximately 2 hrs) at which time the current was increased to 30 mA until the dye front was about 1 cm from the bottom of the gel (5-6 hrs). The analysis was done using a BidRad ProteanR vertical electrophoresis device. Separated proteins were visualized by the double staining tech- nique of Dzandu et al. (1984). Each gel was fixed in 500 ml 40% (v/v) methanol/10% (v/v) acetic acid for 1 hr at room temperature followed by two 30 min.washes in 500 ml 10% (v/v) ethanol/5% (v/v) acetic.acid. The gel was equilibrated in 200 ml of oxidizer (3.4 mM potassium di- chromate + 3.2 mM nitric acid) for 10 min followed by three 5 min washes in 500 ml distilled water. The gel was bathed in 200 m1 of silver reagent (20 mM silver nitrate) followed by three 1 min washes in distilled water. Band development was accomplished by immersing the gel in three changes of 200 ml of develOper (0.28M N32C03,+ 0.008% [w/v] paraformaldehyde) at 37 C for 20 min each. After a 1 min wash in distilled water, the gel was immersed in 200 ml 10% (v/v) acetic acid. The gels were photographed on a fluorescent light box using Kodacolor negative and Kodachrome slide films with a orange FL-B filter. After the first photography, each gel was immersed in 200 ml of 61 counterstain (0.1% [w/v] Coomassie brilliant blue R-250 + 25% [v/v] methanol + 7.5% [v/v] acetic acid) for 1 hr. Gels were destained over- night in 25% (v/v) methanol/7.5% (v/v) acetic acid and photographed as above. RESULTS The M. fascifrons used in these experiments were able to acquire ‘S. glggi via injection and subsequently transmit the pathogen (Table 2). Transmission was poor, never exceeding 11.6% (passage 26). Acqui- sition, however, was much higher, reaching 89% in passage 27. No transmission occurred after passage 30, even though acquisition re- mained at high levels for all but passage 35. Regression analysis of percent transmission on passage number revealed a negative relationship (y = 33.003 - 0.998x) with a slope significantly different from zero at P<.005 (F = 18.89 with 11 and 1 degrees of freedom). Regression analy- sis of percent acquisition on passage number did not produce a lepe significantly different from zero (F = 1.62 with 11 and 1 degrees of freedom). None of the control leafhoppers injected with LD8 medium either acquired or transmittequ. £3551. Only one of the leafhoppers given an acquisition access period on diseased plants was able to transmit S. giggl, and a small number were able to acquire the pathogen in each of the four experiments (Table 3). A total of 17 plants developed S. SALE; symptoms, which were iden- tical to those described by O’Hayer et a1. (1983). Symptoms first ap- peared in young leaves, which showed chlorosis and stunting and often become asymmetric. Three symptomatic plants suddenly wilted and died before spiroplasma isolation could be attempted. Of the remaining 14 62 Table III-2.--Effects of 12 vitro passage on acquisition and transmis- sion of the horseradish brittle root isolate of SpirOplasma citri by injected Macrosteles fascifrons. After injection, leafhoppers were given a 14 day incuba- tion period on healthy asters and then caged individually for 7 days on 4-5 week old aster test plants. Acquisi- tion was confirmed by isolation of spiroplasmas from individual insects. Fraction of Fraction of Leafhoppers Transmittinga Leathppers Acquiringb Passage No. Treatedc:d Controle Treatedc:d Control8 24 1/9 0/4 4/6 0/4 25 3/43 0/56 15/38 0/50 26 5/43 0/30 22/36 0/25 27 2/44 0/72 33/37 0/63 28 0/18 0/17 7/14 0/15 29 1/38 0/31 12/32 0/28 30 4/66 0/36 3/49 0/29 31 0/46 0/32 13/35 0/30 32 0/65 0/40 43/57 0/38 33 0/41 0/40 24/29 0/33 34 0/16 0/30 4/16 0/27 35 0/11 0/55 0/11 0/51 aNo. transmitting/no. surviving incubation period. bNo. producing spiroplasma culture/no. surviving inoculation period. cInjected with 3 x 105-5 x 107 CFUs in 0.1-0.2 .41. dFor transmitting leafhoppers: y = 33.003 - 0.998x, r2 = 0.654, slope significantly different from zero at P<.005. For acquiring leafhoppers: y = 135.353 - 2.977x, r2 = 0.140, lepe not significantly different from zero. eInjected with 0.1-0.2 pl LD8 medium. 63 Table III-3.--Natural acquisition and transmission of the horseradish brittle root isolate of Spiroplasma citri by Macrosteles fascifrons. Treated leafhoppers were given a 14 day acquisition access period on diseased asters followed by a 7 day incubation period on healthy asters. Controls fed only on healthy asters. Leafhoppers were caged individually on 4-5 week old asters for a 7 day inoculation access period. Acquisition was confirmed by isolation of spirOplasmas from individual insects. Fraction of Fraction of Leafhoppers Transmittinga LeafhoPpers Acquiringb Experiment No. Treated Control Treated Control 1 0/32 0/5 1/29 0/3 2 0/37 0/5 2/35 0/4 3 1/33 0/5 3/32 0/4 4 0/34 0/5 1/33 0/4 aNo. transmitting/no. surviving incubation period. bNo. producing spiroplasma culture/no. surviving inoculation period. 64 plants, 13 produced spiroplasma cultures and isolation was not per- formed on the symptomatic plant from natural transmission. All 12 S. 91331 passages involved in these experiments exhibited phytotoxin activity in the culture supernates (Figure 1). Some varia- bility was observed in the assay, which is probably attributable to the age and physiological condition of the leaves used. Even though young, newly opened leaves were used throughout, not all were exactly the same age. The pH of the culture supernates varied from 6.92 to 7.36, but this was apparently unrelated to toxin activity. SDS-PAGE analysis of S. EEEEE membrane proteins revealed many more proteins and/or subunits than previously reported for this spiroplasma (Wroblewski et al. 1977) (Figure 2). The double staining technique demonstrated the presence of sialoglyc0proteins (yellow bands) in the membrane of S. EEEEA’ which has not been reported before. Of interest is the largest and most densely stained band just below the MW 29,000 marker protein. It is most likely spiralin, which has a molecular weight of 26,000 (Wroblewski 1978). This band was stained yellow with the silver stain, indicating that it is a sialoglyc0protein which con- tradicts Wroblewski (1978) who stated that spiralin contains no carbo- hydrate. Further investigation is necessary to resolve this discrepancy. Passage 26 membrane analysis showed a conventional Coomassie bril- liant blue-sensitive protein (approximate MW 19,000) that was apparent- ly lost in passage 34 (Figure 2, arrows). In addition, there appears to be a reduction in some sialoglyc0proteins in passage 34 relative to passage 26, as indicated by the less intense yellow color at the band Llocation just above the deleted protein. 65 “-7“ ‘03..) alt-P” fi'7.“ III as an I. a. as to so to 10 100 so no 20 to an to so no 10 *IllllD IIDIIDllllIllIIIlII - (1' cl loo .. CD I. IID1II .I O “on: fl.‘.,1 lfl-m ‘07.” an I) In n1 co x1 to :n a: 10 “N ”1 ID 1' 1' ii ‘0 II II In Que-00000300»-.. ° "' 0'0 O. 0. III - '2‘ pl 0 7.1) out - '11 pl . 6.96 _ A“ Q Q N U ” U D I II 100 90 fl ,0 00 30 60 n 10 10 ‘0' 1D CI'III1II IIDFI‘Inu 0 II 0- 1| 'CIIOI II 4 « . C .- . m .- - 2.. "-1";- ‘ f” ' .-;:_’:, HI II II II C. II to II 10 ul Ill I! II Ill (I II CD II ll ll 0 ‘OilIII1IIIIII C. Owl 9‘ Ch Ill I'll-I I. II-«n: on .. 1r; . _ mil an. - 12.4. N: - 7.23 7-.- '0 8.- _ - 100 90 80 70 00 50 m an 2" 1‘ . I I 3 C I O I I 3 Cl 1.. IIDGIDl-D Cllllllifi '- 0» OD lIDIII«I."IlIIlIIIIL , a O . m-m plot“ Ins-m pith” 100 ’0 N N 69 w 60 ” 20 10 m ’0 I) 70 t. a 40 n 20 10 a 00>¢H|10010> Oil!!! 0 Illlll1ll IllIIIlII Cll.l' o .1 .24 Figure III—1.--Effects of $3 vitro passage on phytotoxin production of the horseradish brittle root isolate of Spiroplasma citri. Two 3 cm broad bean leaf disks were incubated overnight at 37 C in the percent culture supernate indicated. Controls, second row of disks, were incubated in diluted LD8 medium. Blackened disks indicate toxin activity. Figure III-2.—-SDS—PAGE analysis of purified membranes of the horseradish brittle root isolate of §PEI92¥§§EE.Q§EEZ from passages 26 and 34. Resolving gels were 5—20% acrylamide gradients with a 1 cm 3.75% stacking gel. Run conditions were 15 mA for ca. 2 hrs followed by 30 mA for ca. 6 hrs. Figures A and C show results of silver staining for sialoglyc0proteins while B and D show the same gels, respectively, counter— stained with Coomassie Brilliant blue. Arrow indicates band missing in passage 34. DISCUSSION These results agree with those of O’Hayer et al. (1983) as to the relative inefficiency of M. fascifrons in transmitting S. citri. They diverge, however, in that this leafhopper colony is even less efficient at naturally transmitting the pathogen. This is probably related to the difference in biotype and/or length of time the leafhopper has been in culture, over seven years. In any event, M. fascifrons remains a poor vector of S. £12£1° The pathogenicity of S. 9155; appears to be dependent upon phyto- toxin activity (Daniels 1979a; 1979b; 1983). If true, then the primary effect of continuous £2 23359 passage is on transmissibility, rather than on pathogenicity, as toxin activity was not lost in any of the passages investigated here. It is likely that the toxins involved are excreted end products of necessary metabolic reactions, hence, they are not lost with passage. Several circulative viruses, including wound- tumor virus, potato yellow-dwarf virus, and pea enation mosaic virus, have lost transmissibility after prolonged propagation within host plants without passage through their insect vectors (Liu et al. 1973; Wolcyrz and Black 1957; Bath and Chapman 1967; Tsai and Bath 1974). The transmissibility of the corn stunt spirOplasma also declines with repeated Sgrxiggg passage (Whitcomb and Williamson 1979). It is appar- ent that transmissibility'is a less stable characteristic of insect vectored plant pathogens than is pathogenicity. Microorganisms adapt very rapidly to their environment. Cell-free culture may present a situation where S. SEEEA must give up some meta- bolic activity in order to adapt and maximize growth. The cell-free environment certainly obviates the need to maintain mechanisms of cell 67 68 penetration. The regression analyses supports the idea that continuous 12 ylggg passage results in reduced transmissibility but does not affect the ability of the spiroplasma to survive within the leafhopper. It seems reasonable, then, to speculate from these data that continuous i2_yS££2 passage causes S. SiEEl to lose its ability to infect the necessary leafhopper tissues that would effect transmission. Because nontransmissible passages of S. ElEEl were able to survive and probably prOpagate within the leafhopper, it is likely that the mechanisms pre- sumably lost involved membrane translocation, i.e., the spiroplasma could not enter the necessary cells that ultimately lead to transmis- sion, viz., the salivary acini or other barrier tissues en route. No first hand evidence was obtained in this research that would elucidate the leafhopper infection mechanisms used by S. EEEEl’ How- ever, when considering the possible events involved in cell penetra- tion, it is obvious that membrane-membrane interactions occur first and some mechanism of endocytosis must take place. Whether this mechanism is receptor-mediated, enzymatic, or physical, the host cell must not be destroyed, especially in the case of salivary acini as living cells are necessary for eventual secretion of the pathogen. Because S. 21221 has been visualized in membranous "vesicles" within host tissues (Liu et al. 1983b), receptor-mediated endocytosis may be involved in transcel- lular transport. This necessitates a host membrane receptor as well as a spiroplasma membrane ligand. The loss and reduction of certain mem- brane proteins in passage 34 of S. 21331 may indicate the loss or re- duction of a ligand necessary for host membrane binding. The altera- tion of a soluble protein in a nontransmissible strain of pea enation mosaic virus relative to a transmissible strain may have represented a 69 ligand necessary for membrane binding (Clarke and Bath 1977). More- over, the nontransmissible strain apparently could not enter the sali- vary gland of the pea aphid vector, Acrythosiphon pisum (Harris), after injection into the hemocoel (Harris et a1. 1975). These data are very similar to those presented here and both support a ligand-receptor mechanism of membrane translocation. This work certainly has not elim- inated this possibility and the testing of the receptor-mediated endocytosis hypothesis for infection of specific leafhopper tissues merits further investigation. The differential acquisition of S. citri by M. fascifrons by in- jection.and natural feeding indicates that more than one barrier to transmission exists. Of all the injected leafhoppers from which spiro- plasma isolations were attempted, 50% produced cultures. Only 5.4% of the leafhoppers fed on diseased plants had acquired the spirOplasma. This speaks strongly for a mesenteronal barrier to S. EEEEE infection in noncompetent (nontransmitting) leafhoppers. The fact that many in- jected leathppers were able to maintain viable spiroplasmas indicates that a post-mesenteronal barrier exists as well, possibly the salivary acini membranes. In addition, because only one of the naturally acquiring leafhoppers transmitted the pathogen, the two barriers are probably mutually exclusive, i.e., the mechanism for penetration of the one is different from that for the other. This stands to reason as one would expect the membrane macromolecular profiles of salivary acini and gut epithelium to be substantially different, necessitating different or modified mechanisms of penetration. LITERATURE CITED Bath, J.E. and R.R. Chapman. 1967. Differential transmission of two pea enation mosaic virus isolates by the pea aphid, Acyrthosiphon pisum (Harris). Virology 33: 503-506. Bové, J.M., G. Moutous, C. Saillard, A. Fos, J. Bonfils, J.-C. Vignault, A. Nhami, M. Abassi, K. Kabbage, B. Hafidi, C. Mouches, and G. Viennot-Bourgin. 1979. Mise en évidence de SpirOplasma citri, l'agent causal de la maladie du (stubborn) des agrumes dans 7 cicadelles du Maroc. C.R. Acad. Sci. Ser. D 288: 335-338. Bové, J.M., R.F. Whitcomb, and R.E. MCCoy. 1983. Culture techniques for spiroplasmas from arthropods. Methods in Mycoplasmology 2: 217-223. Chen, T.A. and C.H. Liao. 1975. Corn stunt spiroplasma: Isolation, cultivation, and proof of pathogenicity. Science 188: 1015-1017. Clarke, R.C. and J.E. Bath. 1977. Serological properties of aphid- transmissible and aphid-nontransmissible pea enation mosaic virus isolates. Phytopathology 67: 1035-1040. Daniels, 1M.J. 1979a. .A simple technique for assaying certain microbial phytotoxins and its application to the study of toxins produced by Spiroplasma citri. J. Gen. Microbiol. 114: 323-328. Daniels, M.J. 1979b. The pathogenicity of mycoplasmas for plants. Zbl. Bakt. Hyg., I Abt. Orig. A 245: 184-199. Daniels, M.J. 1983. Mechanisms of spiroplasma pathogenicity. Ann. Rev. Phytopathol. 21: 29-43. Daniels, M.J. and B.M. Meddins. 1974. The pathogenicity of SpirOplasma citri. Les Myc0plasmes, Colloq. INSERM 33: 195-200. Doi, Y., M. Teranaka, K. Yora, and H. Asuyama. 1967. Mycoplasma- or PLT group-like microorganisms found in the phloem elements of plants infected with mulberry dwarf, potato witches’ broom, aster yellows, or Paulownia witches' broom. Ann. PhytOpath. Soc. Jpn. 33: 259-266. Dzandu, J.K., M.E. Deh, D.L. Barratt, and C.E. Wise. 1984. Detection of erythrocyte membrane proteins, sialoglyc0proteins, and lipids in the same polyacrylamide gel using a double-staining technique. Cell Biol. 81: 1733-1737. Gildow, F.E. 1985. Transcellular transport of barley yellow dwarf virus into the hemocoel of the aphid vector, Rhopalosiphum padi. Phytopathology 75: 292-297. 70 71 Harris, R.F., J.E. Bath, G. Thottappilly, and C.R. Hooper. 1975. Fate of pea enation mosaic virus in PEMV-infected pea aphids. Virology 65: 148-162. Hawthorne, J.D. and P.J. Vandemark. 1977. Metabolic studies of Spiroplasma citri. Annual Meeting of the American Society for Microbiology, Abstract 133. Kaloostian, C.H., G.N. Oldfield, E.C. Calavan, and R.L. Blue. 1976. Leafhoppers transmit citrus stubborn disease to weed host. Calif. Agric. 30: 4-5. Kaloostian, C.H., G.N. Oldfield, H.D. Pierce, and E.C. Calavan. 1979. Spiroplasma citri and its transmission to citrus and other plants by leafhoppers. Pp. 447-450 in: Leafhopper Vectors and Plant Disease Agents. K. Maramorosch and R.F. Harris, eds. Academic Press, New York. 654 pp. Laemmli, U.K. 1970. Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature 227: 680-685. Lee, I.-M. and R.E. Davis. 1984. New media for rapid growth of SpirOplasma citri and corn stunt spiroplasma. Phytopathology 74: 84-89 0 Liu, H.-Y., D.J. Gumpf, G.N. Oldfield, and E.C. Calavan. 1983a. Transmission of Spiroplasma citri by Circulifer tenellus. PhytOpathology 73: 582-585. Liu, H.-Y., D.J. Gumpf, G.N. Oldfield, and E.C. Calavan. 1983b. The relationship of Spiroplasma citri and Circulifer tenellus. Phytopathology 73: 585-590. Liu, H.-Y., I. Kimura, and L.M. Black. 1973. Specific infectivity of different wound-tumor virus isolates. Virology 51: 320-326. Lowry, O.H., N.J. Rosebrough, A.L. Farr, and R.J. Randall. 1951. Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent. J. Biol. Chem. 193: 265-275. Markham, P.G. 1982. The behaviour of spiroplasmas in leafhoppers: A review. Congress of the International Organization of Mycoplasmologists, Tokyo. Markham, P.G., T.B. Clark, and R.F. Whitcomb. 1983. Culture techniques for spiroplasmas from arthropods. Methods in Myc0plasmology 2: 217-223. Markham, P.G. and R. Townsend. 1979. Experimental vectors of spirOplasmas. Pp. 413-445 in: Leafhopper Vectors and Plant Disease Agents. K. Maramorosch and K.F. Harris, eds. Academic Press, New YOrk. 654 pp. 72 Markham, P.G., R. Townsend, M. Bar-Joseph, M.J. Daniels, A. Plaskitt, and B.M. Meddins. 1974. SpirOplasmas are the causal agents of citrus little-leaf disease. Ann. Appl. Biol. 78: 49-57. O'Hayer, K.W., G.A. Schultz, C.E. Eastman, J. Fletcher, and R.M. Goodman. 1983. Transmission of SpirOplasma citri by the aster leafhopper Macrosteles fascifrons (HomOptera: Cicadellidae). Ann. Appl. Biol. 102: 311-318. Oldfield, G.N., C.H. Kaloostian, H.D. Pierce, E.C. Calavan, A.L. Granett, and R.L. Blue. 1976. Beet leafhopper transmits citrus stubborn disease. Calif. Agric. 30: 15. Rana, C.L., C.H. Kaloostian, G.N. Oldfield, A.L. Granett, E.C. Calavan, H.D. Pierce, I.M. Lee, and D.J. Gumpf. 1975. Acquisition of Spiroplasma citri through membranes by homopterous insects. Phytopathlogy 65: 1143-1145. Razin, S., M. Hasin, Z. Ne'eman, and S. Rottem. 1973. Isolation, chemical composition, and ultrastructural features of the cell membrane of the myc0plasma-like organism SjiroPlasma citri. J. Bacteriol. 116: 1421-1435. Tsai, J.H. and J.E. Bath. 1974. The loss of transmissibility of two pea enation mosaic virus isolates by the pea aphid, Acyrthosiphon pisum (Harris). Proc. Amer. Phytopathol. Soc. 1: 115-116. Whitcomb, R.F. 1980. The genus Spiroplasma. Ann. Rev. Microbiol. 34: 677-709. Whitcomb, R.F. 1981. The biology of spiroplasmas. Ann. Rev. Entomol. 26: 397-425. Whitcomb, R.F. and L.M. Black. 1982. Plant and arthrOpod mycoplasmas: A historical perspective. Pp. 40-81 in: Plant and Insect Mycoplasma Techniques. M.J. Daniels and P.G. Markham, eds. John Wiley and Sons, New York. 369 pp. Whitcomb, R.F. and D.L. Williamson. 1979. Pathogenicity of mchplasmas for arthrOpods. Zbl. Bakt. Hyg., I. Abt. Orig. A 245: 200-221. Williamson, D.L. and R.F. Whitcomb. 1975. Plant mycoplasmas: A cultivable spiroplasma causes corn stunt disease. Science 188: 1018-1020. Willingham, M.C. and I.H. Pastan. 1983. Receptor-mediated endocytosis: General considerations and morphological approaches. Pp. 1-17 in: Receptor-Mediated Endocytosis. P. Cuatrecasas and T. Roth, eds. Chapman and Hall, New York. 304 pp. Wolcyrz, S. and L.M. Black. 1957. Origin.of‘vectorless strains of potato yellow-dwarf virus. Phytopathology 47: 38. (Abstr.). 73 Wroblewski, H. 1978. Spiralin: Its topomolecular anatomy and its possible function in the SpirOplasma citri cell membrane. Zbl. Bakt. Hyg., I Abt. Orig. A 241: 179-180. (abstr.). Wroblewski, H., K.-E. Johansson, and S. Hjertén. 1977. Purification and characterization of spiralin, the main protein of the SpirOplasma citri membrane. Biochim. BiOphys. Acta 465: 275-289. GENERAL CONCLUSION This research has supplied information as well as posed questions for future investigations into the nature of insect-plant pathogen in- teractions. The combination of scanning electron microscopy of leaf- hopper internal morphology and immunological detection of Spir0plasma gi££l_could.not be accomplished in this work. Finding S. SiEEl in leafhopper sections necessitates coating specimens with something other than gold, as gold coating would obliterate the gold label on the spi- roplasma rendering it undetectable with backscatter analysis. Carbon and aluminum coatings were used in lieu of gold, but these were not able to provide enough conductivity to the specimens and much charging occurred, resulting in poor images in the normal secondary electron mode. Pursuit of this approach to plant pathogen localization in vec- tor tissues is a logical and necessary complement to Chapters I and II. It offers a relatively fast and accurate means of identifying vector tissues that are barriers to plant pathogen infection in noncompetent insects. Analysis of these tissues and subsequent comparison to con- current tissues in competent vectors may provide important information as to the mechanisms of vector infection and, hopefully, means of manipulating those mechanisms for disease control. This project revealed some important information about the mem- brane of S. ElEEi: including the ubiquity and mobility of membrane an- tigens and the previously unknown complexity of membrane proteins. These data indicate that membrane interactions with host cells may be more sophisticated than is currently thought. Certainly the reduction and loss of membrane proteins with continuous S2 vitro passage that is 74 75 coincidental with the loss of transmissability is cause to further probe these phenomena with a view toward elucidating the mechanisms involved. This will mean working out systems to investigate, e.g., if ligand-receptor binding occurs or if enzymes exist that attack host cell membranes in a highly specific manner. I have succeeded in par- tially purifying a membrane fraction from the mesenteronal tissue of ScaphytOJius acutus (Say), which was chosen because of its large size. Much work is yet to be done to fully characterize this fraction, but, once completed, this approach should be applicable to the smaller leaf- hoppers that transmit S. glgi. 12 m reaction of purified leafhop- per membranes with those of S. $32.21 may reveal specific protein bind- ing between the preparations. This is one suggested means of testing a receptor-ligand hypothesis of pathogen attachment to host membranes. For success, however, it will be necessary to select a much more effi- cient vector of S. citri than Macrosteles fascifrons (Stal), viz., Circulifer tenellus (Baker). Finally, this work has demonstrated that barriers to the transmis- sion of S. citri do exist in M. fascifrons. Moreover, these barriers are not identical and in combination tend to insure nontransmission. This may account for the leathppers known to harbor S. Egg natural- ly, but which lack the ability to transmit the pathogen. If these bar- riers can be defined and ultimately introduced into competent vector populations, a new avenue to control of insect-vectored plant pathogens will be opened . GQN STQTE UNIV. L nICHI ll 3 l I ll l Wlllllllflzl’ll 12931080 llllllr l.