I

.
I

_
‘

'

I

I

.

'

A

’

1
.
3

<
.

-
u
t
r
.
'

-
.

.

.

.

.

V

4
:

'
—
-
‘
—

‘
:
-

‘

.

'

3.. {93'0”}'

52-34 .

"'I I

I

.

  

  

_'.I\JII,'"£.€~'

-- {I

QM»?IIIII’IIII(HII

o

I

  
  

  

'

-
.
.

.

'

‘
J

A

A

.
_

-

3

"

1
-

-
'

'
A
V

-

-
:

r
.
‘

“
I

4

'
_

-

_
-

  

.'
   

-

_
_
—
o
.
'

.

-
'
~
"
:

'

-

.
2

31' Val.

‘

IfghI g

.

xII

-

   

4
'

.

         

I."

'
I
.

—

'

Ijun-I331». .I'

=. I,»

IF

i

4331‘?

o

      

  

raw

  

we} t’

r

I? . .I

'

I .‘I‘WWX‘

  

I

I

I'

   

SE13}?

.

.

_

  

Y; i.

.
v
.
.
)
.
1
0

0
‘

.
:

o

.
k

I‘

KL,

  

§

    

)
2
.

.

"

:
9
:
'
é
g
h

-

.

I

’
<

'

J

"
.
'
4

I

.

.
R

'

.
.

é

    

I

"
o

~

.
I
.

   

.

.

-
i
”

   

'
.

  

     

’
t
u
fl
‘
!
0
2

.
.

"
1
.

z

.

.

,
.

I

é
'
E
a
g
"
1

¢

.
;
)
1
.
r

l

Ii

.I

'
;
a

—
.
.
.
4
‘

;
“
p

‘

-
_
§
0
‘
A
-

.
‘
0
‘

'

v

.
I

.
'
0

     

-
;
  
s

5:9“?

“.II'I't":‘

I:'I'II-I

 
   

‘

.
.
.
.

‘
-
h
‘
-
“
_
‘
.
-
_
.

. r     :.

‘JWrl'i"‘1‘w'wi’fi.

4
“
.
.

-.

.

.

'. '.I

'§‘
.

'v r

-.L-IrNIIIIIIIIJ h" III-I‘Il;IIIII II

'II,Iéu".\J'I"

‘I

III

.""I D|

I.

I?

  

I

'I

(a:

l'

[I 3"“. II

'

»

-

..

IJESIs'tZIIII'IiI‘i .‘,3"5"=-'¢'7$':II’ fin?“ -:":-:

I ~.II‘II

I“

INN'I

H' :I'II

'I.

1’!

1‘

IIII‘}

IIIEII-II

II: III

'

I

>I

II

IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII

:d':" J'snjl ‘): 21"J‘ "1'5'fi1' I. 14‘“

     

~

I

inYI-w

..I'III.:’,I: I”

'-‘

II

'.

.u'

I

I: IIwIII

II

\QII‘I1I‘

II

I

III I" .I.

I

I

I

.

III,- IIIf

IIII.

I

   

off-IIIII‘III-I-i’vz ‘I'K‘III

(#0

I‘VAII

‘II_ IIIIIIM PI‘I-I'I I

t-I‘IW IIII~LEILIIHL§II3 by”

"'0 I. 1:pr I

III.
IJ!r,"-II‘IIIII‘J- '.lIh J» IL5II~.I,II1~

.’

   

ML

'.I

w-‘IJI..I

WT III-II .,

.III

‘

3“""1:1!"

I

III

I,'

1'“

. M“ II "

.

'

| 'L3}33;! - f“; ‘I‘ '

I-
IIIj-J. I III, II'III’I3 ‘I'II'.,

‘13 2‘1!

.

‘

‘

'

'- “I

II...

I

”3’"!

I :hivl-‘I'_!)l(I

I‘vIJIJI‘)

n‘"“.’-“fig:

‘_‘I'

II .|

‘."'l¥

.

.

"W "

'-

I“:

'

‘

‘

‘--:

~

'I

I

'

'3

.'II.;

I,

4

.II-I‘I'.\’

i= * «I»: WWW." 43.=I.‘

...I\" '

H

3'.

I‘ ‘,

III,‘I’

III

‘

     
   
     

'A1? W?

-_I.

;

  

vi“)

I

     

I

,

'3’. II

"1L.:::":' "1:.“ [WW1 “H; ‘li‘l‘rv 'I'»

II

II

.'

I

_II, II,

1
I.

‘

I

12?.
.".,
I

i :1
I

l

'

[or] I“ .I

II’II

‘U k I"13’"l‘vr' '"I“‘~
,Iw.

.‘ IL‘LII I

0

.

I.lI:“JR?) )II I“

’

II

,5'I'.,'I 493:3

'Inlfl I

‘

'YI'I;1."._ ‘ ' '.$:I‘I""

j

.I‘

I-IIIe'I'I :III‘I:‘.I'I'

u. .41

I."

‘vj'!

'I'I‘II"

"' IV'I‘I.‘I

'

m. .III' II. .2»: . .I «II’I‘J
w1'

~.
-‘~. ' "

- W I
“M“ I'

HIV '.‘2'.

..

'~

-.

‘II

II

'

I

I . I I:-

.

I

I

IIII

.I.

'.I

Ian; .IIII-I
I» I.
.II.~ "I

*1: IIIII

‘1'.)

.I

..

.,,- «I ...

“x

_ ..

..

I

.

'.‘.'
i, ‘

_ |‘:I I ,:.|I.”fIIIII“I‘

I

‘qu QII “w! ..III

 
  
 

awnI:mI) II II 3

 

 
   

 

  

 

 

  

"IIJI'l,U I

awn?)I

a

IIII :II
II.I.I I“

I'I:II IIIII'
, -

).

'I

I'.

  

~
3

 

  

' |

0|
l'

.

.

.

I

.

.

'I 1'7:

l

I

,‘I-

'

£33?I III“:

12.3.2.1”,11“

ll «'1' .

IIII-IIGI,v-I’.

II

lI“f‘ WHY:

'

I III-III

.2.

31*

  

-

.

l?

5"

 

n-—_

.r;

.

......- "‘4'

' l

4

'

5

‘5'!

 

This is to certify that the

thesis entitled

STRUCTURAL EVOLUTION OF SOUTHEASTERN MICHIGAN -

MIDDLE ORDOVICIAN TO MIDDLE SILURIAN

presented by

Paul K. Mes Cher

has been accepted towards fulfillment

of the requirements for

M. S .

Geology

degree in   

 

Major professor    

6

Date

Dec. 12, 1980

 

0-7639

 

44 WSW”

”Ill/I

010

   

({fl“\\mL

N“.

‘i‘“‘ll'

\I”

.
‘

 

   

0912 WWE

cargo?

OVERDUE FINES:

25¢ per day per item

RETURNING LIBRARY MATERIALS:

Place in book return to remove

charge from circulation records

 

 

STRUCTURAL EVOLUTION OF SOUTHEASTERN MICHIGAN --

MIDDLE ORDOVICIAN TO MIDDLE SILURIAN

By

Paul K. Mescher

A THESIS

Submitted to

Michigan State University

in partial fulfillment of the requirements

'

for the degree of

MASTER OF SCIENCE

Department of Geology

1980

’
7
/
4
(

,
'
4

1
/
{

2
’
(

ABSTRACT

STRUCTURAL EVOLUTION OF SOUTHEASTERN MICHIGAN -

MIDDLE ORDOVICIAN TO MIDDLE SILURIAN

BY

Paul K. Mescher

The structural history of southeastern Michigan has been previously

tied in with wrench fault mechanics related to compressional forces accom-

panying the Appalachian Orogeny.

For this study, the following lithostrat-

igraphic units were studied:

Middle Ordovician through Lower Silurian

(complete), Ar2 Carbonate (Middle Silurian), and Dundee formation (Middle

Devonian).

Structural reversal is demonstrated along the Lucas-Monroe Mbnocline,

suggesting that this feature is a true extension of the Bowling Green Fault.

Faulting between two wells located on the northwest extension of this fault

suggests that the forces responsible for the structural reversal progressed

slowly along the fault.

The Rovsek-Jorgensen #1 well appears to be a con-

tinuation of the failed Precambrian rift valley prOposed by Hinze et al.,

(1969, 1975).

Vertical offset in the Precambrian basement of the Northville

Anticline has been estimated up to 1,000 feet by some authors.

Therefore

‘fault movements appear to be dominantly vertical in this area, caused by

shearing along pre-existing_lines of weakness in the Precambrian basement.

As the result of regional tectonics exerting shearing forces, the base-

ment surface in Michigan probably has an irregular surface that plays a ma—

jor role in forming the structures visible in subsurface mapping of south-

eastern Michigan.

DEDICATION

I would like to dedicate this study to my parents, Mr. and Mrs.

Paul A. Mescher, for all the help and faith they have expressed to me

throughout my career.

ii

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The writer wishes to express his deep appreciation to Dr.

James H. Fisher, chairman of the thesis committee, for his friend-

ship, valuable suggestions and assistance and under whose guid-

ance this study was undertaken.

Special thanks go to Dr. C. E. Prouty and Dr. James W. Trow,

other members of the committee, for their most appreciated advice,

suggestions, and constructive criticism of this manuscript.

Thanks also go to Dow Chemical Company of Midland, Michigan,

'for providing the financial assistantship that made it possible to

complete this Master's program and provided valuable training for

this thesis project.

The writer gratefully acknowledges Mr. Garland D. E113 and

Mr. Ronald E. Elowski of the Michigan State Geological Survey for

discussions and assistance in providing gamma ray logs, state records,

and well samples necessary for this study.

Many well logs were also

provided by Dr. Fisher, Dow Chemical Co.,and by my father, Paul A.

Mescher.

Finally, the writer wishes to express sincere gratitude to his

parents for their encouragement during the course of these studies.

A

special thanks goes to my father, a petroleum geologist for over 30

years, for his unending patience and support}

iii

TABLE OF CONTENTS

INTRODum ON C

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

0

General .

.

.

. .'. .

Purpose and Scope .

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

Procedure 9 Method of Study

Location. .

.

.

. .'. .

Reliability of Data .

.

.

.

.

.

PREVIOUS WORK WITHIN THE MICHIGAN BASIN.

STRUCTURAL HISTORY OF THE MICHIGAN BASIN

REGIONAL STRATIGRAPHY. .

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

Gene ta]. 0

O

O

C

O

I

O

O

O

O

O

O

I

0

Upper Cambrian - Lower Ordovician.

Middle Ordovician. .

Upper Ordovician .

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

Lower Silurian

Middle Silurian (A92 Carbonate .

.

Middle Devonian (Dundee Formation)

MAP INTERPRETATION .

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

Gene :31 C

I

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

0

Glenwood Isopach .

.

.

Black River Isopach. .

Trenton Isopach. .

Utica Isopach

.

.

.

.

.

.

Cincinnatian Isopachs.

.

.

Unit One .

Unit Two .

.

.

Unit Three .

Unit Four

Unit Five

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

Cataract Isopach .

Clinton Isopach

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

A92 Carbonate Isopach.

Dundee Isopach .

.

.

Trenton Structure. .

.

.

A92 Carbonate Structure.

Dundee Structure .

.

.

iv

Page

H
N
‘
-
l
u
l
U
i
U

O
\

13

29

29

29

32

36

37

37

39

39

40

40

44

45

46

46

SO

50

52

52

S3

56

57

57

58

58

O

O

O

O

O

I

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

0

PETROLEUM OCCURRENCE .

.

.

SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS. .

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

BIBLIOGRAPHY .

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

APPENDIX (TABLE I)

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

61

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

63

.

.

69

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

Catalog of Wells Used in the Southeast Quadrant of

Michigan's Lower Peninsula .

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.I.

75

LIST OF FIGURES

Stratigraphic Succession in Michigan .

.

.

.

. ... .

.

.

A Representative Gamma Ray Well Log Section. .

.

.

.

.

.

Location Map 0

O

O

O

0

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

0

Regional Structure Map of Michigan and Surrounding~

Area 0.

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

C

O

O

O

O

O

I

O

O

O

O

O

O

0

Regional Precambrian Structure Map .

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

Major Structural Trends in the Michigan Basin. .

.

.

.

.

l4

18

21

Aeromagnetic Map of the Southern Peninsula of Michigan .

23

Bouguer Gravity Anomaly Map'. .

.

.

.

._.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

24

9.

Precambrian Province 9 Lithology Map .

.

10.

Revised Basalt-Trough Model. .

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

27

.

.

28

11.

Regional Trenton Structure

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

33

12.

Dundee Isopach of Southeastern Michigan and

Southwestern Ontario

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

13.

North-South Cross-section across "Washtenaw Graben"

.

14.

East-West Cross-section across "Washtenaw Graben"

.

.

.

.

15.

East9West Cross-section across Lucas - Monroe Monocline.

16.

Diagrammatic Structural Cross-section across Lucas 9

Monroe Fau1 t O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

< O

O

O

O

O

0

17.

Structural Reversal across the Lucas - Monroe Fault. .

.

18.

Structural Cross-section between Two Nearby Washtenaw

co‘mty Wells 0

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

38

42

43

48

49

51

55

19.

Aligned Anticlinal Structures. .

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

59

vi

Figure

Page

20.

Location of Rovsek - Jorgensen Well .

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

65

21.

Basement Structure. .

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

68

vii

LIST OF PLATES

Plate

(In Pocket)

ISOPACH MAPS

1.

Glenwood

2.

Black River

3.

Trenton

4.

Utica

Cincinnatian Series

5.

Unit One

6.

Unit Two

7.

Unit Three

8.

Unit Four

9.

Unit Five

10.

Cataract

11.

Clinton

12.

A92 Carbonate

13.

Dundee

STRUCTURE MAPS

14.

Trenton

15.

A92 Carbonate

l6.

Dundee

viii

INTRODUCTION

General

The Middle Ordovician carbonates of Michigan have long been a

prolific hydrocarbon source, and their importance and potential as a

petroleum reservoir has continued to grow throughout the years.

Pro-

duction from Albion-Scipio, Michigan's only class A field, comes from

the Middle Ordovician Trenton and Black River formations.

The Trenton-

Black River is still considered by many geologists to be the most likely

prospect for giant oil fields in the Michigan Basin (DeHaas, 1979).

The Albion9Scipio field consists of several narrow linear oil

fields located on or along a possible deep seated, dolomitized strike-

slip fault or fracture zone trending northwest across Hillsdale, Jackson,

and Calhoun Counties (Ells, 1962).

There are numerous similar, though

smaller fields located in southeast Lower Michigan.

These include the

Sumpter, New Boston, Deerfield, Summerfield, Freedom, Medina, and North-

ville fields located in Washtenaw, Lenawee, Monroe and Wayne Counties.

Total Petroleum has also made recent discoveries during 197991980 in

Jackson County.

While it is assumed that production is from fault or fracture

zones, test wells have yet to be drilled to the basement on either side

of the proposed Albion-Scipio fault system.

This would conclusively

prove whether there is any vertical offset to this system.

‘Merritt

(1968) used a gravity study to conclude that vertical offset could be

1

as much as several hundred feet.

The proposed basement faults are believed to be of Precambrian

age (Fisher 1969 et.al).

These old fault planes probably served as re-

activation surfaces throughout geologic time and played an important

role in the developmental history of the Michigan Basin.

From regional

studies by Ells (1969) and others, the southeast quadrant of Lower Michi-

gan appears as a geologically complex and intriguing area.

This new

study attempts to shed further insight into the structural history of

this area of the basin as well as outlining the potential for further pe-

troleum exploration.

Purpose and Scope

 

Abundant subsurface data in the form of gamma ray logs, state

drilling records, well samples, and a small number of well cores are

available for the southeast quadrant of Lower Michigan.

Well control

is good in Jackson, Washtenaw and Lenawee Counties but tends to be

quite sparse in eastern Wayne and Monroe Counties where the cities of

Detroit and Monroe are located.

The main purpose of this study is to determine the times when

these faults were reactivated and the magnitudes of their vertical

and/or lateral displacement.

Three structural contour and 13 isopach

maps, as well as stratigraphic cross—sections are used to relate the

stratigraphy and faulting events to the evolutionary deve10pment of the

Michigan Basin from Middle Ordovician (Glenwood) through Early Silurian

(Clinton) time (Figure 1).

In addition, the Middle Silurian A92 Car-

bonate and Middle Devonian Dundee formations are mapped to provide in-

sight into later geologic changes in this area of the basin.

These

 
 

l
l
a

 

m 95!!!

  

 

w

madngulfi mcnnmmmaz .2 351.992

Egg

my

[Pill

[IRIIII'I I: -u

[lln'ill'lll
lull-Ill R'll'lr'tllo-

i! i- i

[I‘

[3

II

will;

”I."

'5'.
ll
'Ilu'pl

[I I'll"

II Il .lllllt

.I

I‘ll:

~I'

[I It‘ll-Io,

[I II

I t C lllllloo-

ill

""hl.‘

II.-

||If3 It'll..-

1."

I.-

U
I'll..-
III-
1'
.Il'llo'

ifI"

'1’

[-i IPI-IIIII

[I P.

fl lfin'lll'

I}

Ii Ik' II..-

.l'n

III.

III '.II .IBo'

[Ii—III 'l'

...ll

0'

 

 

 

 

Mnmcno H.

mnumnumnnern mcnnmmuwon Hp zunrwmms

 

 

 

maps may be found in the pocket located in the back of the thesis.

Procedure -- Method of Study

 

A threefold approach was used to attain data for use in map con-

struction.

(1)

Gamma ray/neutron logs (primarily) were obtained from the

Michigan State University Geology Department, the State Geological Sur-

vey in Lansing, and the private collection of Paul Mescher, Sr.

All

available logs reaching the Dundee through Lower Ordovician were used.

A total of 114 mechanical logs were reviewed for this study.

(2)

State drilling records were examined where there were no

available gamma ray/neutron logs.

These were obtained from the same

sources as #1 above.

Formation tops that were obviously incorrect or

questionable were not used.

A total of 203 state drilling records were

reviewed, bringing the total number of well locations to 317.

(3) Samples were used to spot check areas where gamma ray logs

were unavailable and state drilling records were in doubt.

These were

again obtained from the State Geological Survey in Lansing and the Michi-

gan State University Geology Department.

Most of the samples viewed were

rotary samples although a few shallow wells had cable tool samples.

Sam-

ples were examined using procedures outlined in the Quarterly of the

Colorado School of Mines ("Examination of Well Cuttings," Vol. 46, No. 4,

1951).

'

All samples were examined using a binocular microscope with a

range of lenses from 10x to 40x.

An incandescent light source and a

fluorescent light source were used to accurately determine colors and

grain details.

Carbonates were differentiated using a mixture of seven

parts water to one part concentrated hydrochloric acid.

Only four sample sets were reviewed for this paper.

The bulk

of the data was obtained from methods two and three for use in cor-

relating 1ithostratigraphic units.

Of great help in correlating gamma ray logs were the strati-

graphic cross-sections prepared by R. T. Lilienthal (1978), a State

Survey geologist.

These cross-sections criss-cross the state and were

thoroughly tested during the author's association with Dow Chemical Co.

Of particular interest was the subdivision of the Late Ordovician Cin-

cinnatian Series into five persistent lithostratigraphic units.

Nurmi

(1972) made a similar fivefold subdivision of the Cincinnatian Series.

However, his classification also included the Utica Shale as a sixth

unit.

Other differences become obvious in Figure 2.

Lilienthal did not continue his Cincinnatian units into eastern

Wayne County, but the author found no apparent problems in correlating,

unit tops in this area.

Lessee

The area of study consists of the southeast quadrant of the

Southern Peninsula of Michigan (Figure 3).

This includes about 402

of Jackson County, and Washtenaw, Wayne, Lenawee, and Mbnroe Counties

in their entirety.

Reliability of Data

 

The main problems encountered in this study were poor well

coverage in eastern Wayne and Monroe Counties and inaccuracies en-

countered in state drilling records.

Many times these apparent errors

were in very old entries recorded when Michigan's stratigraphic suc-

cession was not as well understood, or when only the driller was

Nurmi 1972

Lilienthal 1978

 

Manitoulin

Manitoulin

   

~-——

-

E

:.

Cincinnatian

Unit 6

Cincinnatian

Unit

5

   

Unit 5

a

Unit

4

 

   

Unit 4

 

Unit

3

'5

 

Unit 3

Unit

2

‘_

 

'§

 

 

Unit 2

I].

  

3

,

§

Unit

1

t-i

rig.

 

an;

  

1!

Ii

Unitl

(Utica)

 

1§

1!:

ILQ'

 

Utica

 

E

  
   
  
   
 

Trenton

Trenton

 

Ljél

 

*‘f’

 

u

l

g

:

 

 

'7.

 

 

I.

Figure 2.

A Representative Gamma Ray Well Log Section

LAKE

It CLAIR

Area of Study 

(.408! Ill!

CANADA

0
=3

It

I

Ill-flu

Figure 3.

Location Map

responsible for noting formation tops.

The only major discrepancy noted in comparing Lilienthal's

lithostratigraphic units to formation tops picked in state records

could be seen in choosing the top of the A92 Carbonate.

This top was

consistently picked five to ten feet higher in the column in state rec-

ords than those chosen by Lilienthal.

PREVIOUS WORK.WITHIN THE MICHIGAN BASIN

Merritt (1968) made a gravitational study of the Albion-Scipio

field in an attempt to determine vertical offset in the Precambrian

basement complex.

Later, Hinze and Merritt (1969) conducted a gravi-

tational study of the entire basement complex of the Lower Peninsula.

Laaksonen (1971) examined the basement lithology of the Michigan Basin

using well cuttings.

Cohee (1947, 1948) investigated the Cambrian and Ordovician of

the Michigan Basin and adjoining areas using cable tool samples.

Ells

(1967) prepared a stratigraphic cross-section of the Cambrian and Ordo-

vician formations based on gamma ray logs and similar lithologies for a

limited number of wells.

Catacosinos (1972, 1974) studied Cambrian

lithostratigraphy using gamma ray logs, state records, and well cuttings.

Syrjamaki (1977) studied the Lower Ordovician Prairie du Chien forma-

tion using gamma ray logs, state records, and the previous work of Co-

hee.

Ordovician studies have been carried out in adjacent areas by

Gutstadt (1958) in Indiana, Sanford (1961) in southwestern Ontario,

Buschbach (1965) in Illinois, and Stelzer (1966) in Ohio.

The Trenton

unconformity problem was examined in regional detail by Rooney (1966)

and others.

Hussey (1950) examined Middle Ordovician rocks outcrOpping in

the vicinity of Escanaba in Michigan's Upper Peninsula.

Seyler (1974)

10

made a structure and isopach study of Michigan's Middle Ordovician sub-

surface using gamma ray logs.

Newhart (1976) studied the carbonate fa-

cies of the Trenton - Black River.

The Upper Ordovician Cincinnatian Series was studied by Nurmi

(1972), as discussed earlier.

Much of the early work on the Lower Silurian was descriptive

rather than interpretive, or consisted of a total group study.

Cohee

(1948) lumped

the Manitoulin and Cabot Head formations into the Cata-

ract Group due to their gradational contact and a lack of well con-

trol.

Various studies looked at the Lower Silurian in limited areas

of the Michigan Basin (Ehlers, 1962; Ehlers and Kesling, 1957,-~ Shaver,

1974).

Brigham (1971) did a structural study including the Silurian

Vfor southwestern Ontario and southeastern Michigan.

Lower Silurian out-

crops have been described on Manitoulin Island by Bolton (1968), in

eastern Wisconsin by Shrock (1938), and in Indiana by Pinsak (1964).

Potter (1975) conducted a Lower Silurian subsurface study based on

gamma ray logs.

Many studies have been made of the Middle Silurian Niagaran

Series due to petroleum occurrence in pinnacle reefs.

The original sub-

surface terminology in Michigan was developed by Landes (1945).

His

division of the Salina into eight primary units (including the A92

Carbonate) is the most widely used classification today.

Evans (1950)

modified this system slightly.

Ells (1958, 1960, 1963, 1969) has cor-

related the various Silurian units in detail around the various Niag9

aran pinnacle reef oil fields and the Albion-Scipio field.

Fisher et a1

(1969) has also done detailed correlation in the Michigan Basin.

Fin-

cham (1975) studied the Salina units in the subsurface using gamma ray

logs.

ll

Niagaran reef faunas have been studied in great detail by

Cummings and Shrock (1928), Lowenstam (1950), Huh (1973), and many

others.

Shaw (1975) concluded that Niagaran reef thicknesses were di-

rectly related to structural trends in the underlying strata.

On a regional scale the works of Cohee (1948), Melhorn (1958),

Ehlers and Kesling (1962), Sanford (1972), Mesollela (1974), and many

others are extensive:

The Devonian as a whole has been isopached using gamma ray logs

by Fisher (1969).

Gardner (1974) also used gamma ray logs to make a

regional stratigraphic and depositional environment study of the Middle

Devonian

in the Michigan Basin.

Landes (1951) studied the Detroit River

Group, and the possibility of a Middle Devonian unconformity was exam-

ined by Newcombe (1930).

Bloomer (1969) described lithology and porosity

in a Middle Devonian Dundee core.

Other Dundee carbonate studies have

been carried out by Tinklepaugh (1957), Jackson (1958), Dastanpour (1977),

Hamrock (1978), Hyde (1979), and Ten Have (1979).

Several comprehensive Michigan Basin studies have also been of

great interest.

Ells (1969) wrote "The Architecture of the Michigan

Basin,‘

' an excellent structural summary.

This was complemented by

Fisher's "Early Paleozoic History of the Michigan Basin."

Fisher also

presented a "Structural History of the Michigan Basin" at the 1979 meet-

ing of the Michigan Basin Geological Society.

A most helpful recent‘state publication by Lilienthal (1978)

illustrates the gamma ray curves used in preparing his cross-sections.

This aided immeasurably in correlating the wells used in this study.

The cross-sections cover virtually the entire Lower Peninsula of Michigan,

12

and include Jurassic through Cambrian formations and Upper Precambrian,

depending on the location and total depth of the well.

STRUCTURAL HISTORY OF THE MICHIGAN BASIN

The Michigan Basin is a roughly circular, symmetrical auto—

geosynclinal or intracratonic basin located in the Central Interior

Platform of the United States.

It includes the Southern Peninsula

and the eastern part of the Northern Peninsula of Michigan, eastern

Wisconsin, the northeast corner of Illinois, northern Indiana, north-

west Ohio, and parts of Ontario bordering Lake Huron, Lake St. Clair,

and the western end of Lake Erie (Figure 4).

Surrounding the basin are

numerous positive structures.

These include the Algonquin Arch to the

east (Ontario), the Findlay Arch to the southeast (northwest Ohio), the

Kankakee Arch to the southwest (north Indiana),the Wisconsin Arch to the

west (central Wisconsin), and the Canadian Shield to the north and

northeast (Canada).

The total areal extent of the basin has been esti-

mated at 122,000 square miles (Cohee, 1965).

.

Through the years there has been considerable controversy over

the age and roles these structures played in influencing the structural

history of the Michigan Basin.

Most writers have agreed that the Algon-

quin Arch was a positive feature during part of the Paleozoic.

Sanford

and Quillian (1958) used isopach maps to show that the transgressive

overlap of Upper Cambrian units onto the arch indicates its presence in

Upper Cambrian time at least.

Sutterlin and Brigham (1967) proposed a

Precambrian age for the arch due to the thinning of Upper Cambrian rocks

over local Precambrian highs.

They stated that the highs were erosional

13

14

 

LAKE

SUPER/0R \~.

c AN ADA

UPPER

’

MICHIGAN

.\ -

  

MICHIGAN

BASIN

    

HOWELL

ANTICLINE

“”5

\

 

  

 

..........

“

ALBION-

SCIPIO-’\

TREND

   

LA/tt/

ILL.

     

LUCAS-

 

MONROE

,

1111333331“

...............

...........

..

~

-

"

....”

...............

   

..........

... ......

MONOCLINE & NW

EXTENSION

............

................

...........

..................

.........

 

 

 

 

Regional Structure Map of Michigan and Surrounding Area

[modified from Green (1957), Prouty (1974), and Fisher (1979)]

Figure 4.

 

 

15

.features present prior to deposition.

Cohee (1947), Kay and Colbert

(1965), and Brigham (1971) all believed that the absence of Lower Or-

dovician rock from southeastern Michigan and western Ontario was the

result of intense erosion during Post-Knox unconformity time.

The Findlay Arch also has its own history.

Pirtle (1932) be-

lieved the arch originated primarily during Cincinnatian time.

Lock-

ett (1947) tied the Algonquin and Findlay Arches together.

Sanford

(1961) used lithologic data and isopach mapping to show Lockett to be in

error, stating that the Findlay Arch was not prominent until Upper Ordo-

vician or Late Trenton time.

Cohee (1948) inferred the presence of the

arch in Upper Cambrian time due to the erosion of Upper Cambrian and

Lower Ordovician formations in southeastern Michigan and northeastern

Ohio, and the absence of Cambrian and Lower Ordovician rocks in Ontario.

Woodward (1961) believed the Findlay Arch was present during the Lower

Ordovician, while Janssens and Stieglitz (1974) postulated a Devonian}

age.

Lockett (1947) believed the Chatham Sag to be a breach in the

older Algonquin - Findlay Arches due to the subsidence of the adjacent

Michigan and Appalachian Basins.

Green (1957) believed the Algonquin

and Findlay Arches were a tectonically related continuation of the Cin-

cinnati Arch.

Sanford (1961) stated that there was no tectonic rela-

tionship to the arches.

Instead, he thought the Chatham Sag was the

result of a downthrown, faulted basement block.

Pirtle (1932) believed the Kankakee Arch had a Precambrian age

and was a southwest extension of the Wisconsin Arch.

Ekblaw (1938) be-

lieved this structure had a Lower or Middle Ordovician origin.

This

was later verified through the use of isopach mapping by Cohee (1945),

16

and Swann (1951), who showed that the development of the Kankakee Arch

did not occur until after Prairie du Chien time.

Green (1957) related

the structure in the Findlay, Kankakee, and Cincinnati Arch regions to

basin subsidence rather than structural uplift between basins.

He then

prOposed that the term Kankakee Arch be dropped due to a lack of evi-

dence for true arching extending from Indiana to Illinois.

Pirtle (1932) believed that the Wisconsin Arch showed upward

movement during the Precambrian.

Workman (1935) and Snyder (1968) as-

signed a Pre-St. Peter age, and Workman stated that portions of the

arch were eroded as low as the Franconia formation.

Cohee (1947) con-

sidered the arch to have an Upper Cambrian or Lower Ordovician age based

on dolomite-sand ratios and their occurrences in the Eau Clair, Tremp-

ealeau, and Prairie du Chienformations of Wisconsin and Michigan.

The origin of the Michigan Basin has been the subject of many

debates since Douglas Houghton first studied the rocks of the Northern

Peninsula in 1814.

Pirtle (1932) studied fold trends in the Michigan

Basin and concluded that these folds were controlled by trends of weak-

ness in the Precambrian basement rocks.

He suggested that the folds were

due to vertical forces associated with horizontal compression that was

most intense after Middle Mississippian time.

Newcombe (1933) also believed that Precambrian basement faults

controlled the localization of en echelon folds present in the Michigan

Basin.

He felt that these structures reflected the result of shearing.

that developed in the basement complex during the Keweenawan Disturbance.

The principal folding of the anticlinal trends was believed to have oc-

curred during the Late Devonian, with subsequent movements during the

Late Mississippian accentuating the structures.

l7

Kirkham (1937) dismissed tangential and horizontal mountain-

building forces from having a role in the origin of the Michigan Basin.

He believed the shifting of large magma bodies from one area of the

earth's crust to another created a "downwarpingU rather than a true

basin.

During this movement the Precambrian surface became marked by

.faults, rifts, joint systems, and shear zones, creating lines of weak-

ness along which vertical forces could act later.

Step faults along.

these lines could then create subparallel anticlinal trends.

Lockett (1947) claimed that the dominant positive structures

surrounding the Michigan Basin were the cores of Precambrian mountains.

The principal "movements" of these structures during the Paleozoic

were the result of basin subsidence.

The weight of sediments derived

from these mountains provided the subsidence mechanism.

Continued

sedimentation caused differential subsidence along lines of weakness in

the Precambrian basement, particularly on the basinward sides of these

lines.

Lockett attributed the mid-basinal anticlinal trends to this

subsidence rather than orogenicforces.

A regional Precambrian structure map is included here for future

reference (Figure 5).

It was constructed by splicing together maps by

Brigham (1971) and Hinze et.al.(1975).

Kilbourne (1947) attributed the formation of the Howell Anti-

cline to normal faulting in the basement rocks.

Paris (1977) later tied

the development of the Howell Anticline in with the compressional forces

of the Appalachian Orogeny.

Kilbourne gave a Goldwater age to this

structure, while Paris ascribed a Late Salina age.

Cohee and Landes (1958) claimed that the Michigan Basin first

expressed closure during Late Silurian time, with great downwarping.

 

18

 

 

 

 

 

.

.

--.._1‘ '

I

I

 

WHOOO/

  

  

 

 

 

 

  

    
 

    

  

 

Figure 5.

Regional Precambrian Structure Map '

[modified from Brigham (1971) and Hinze et.al.(1975)]

19

’features present prior to deposition.

Cohee (1947), Kay and Colbert

(1965), and Brigham (1971) all believed that the absence of Lower Or-

dovician rock from southeastern Michigan and western Ontario was the

result of intense erosion during Post-Knox unconformity time.

The Findlay Arch also has its own history.

Pirtle (1932) be-

lieved the arch originated primarily during Cincinnatian time.

Lock-

ett (1947) tied the Algonquin and Findlay Arches together.

Sanford

(1961), using lithologic data and isopach mapping, differed from Lockett,

stating that the Findlay Arch was not prominent until Upper Ordovician

or Late Trenton time.

Cohee (1948) inferred the presence of the arch

in Upper Cambrian time due to the erosion of Upper Cambrian and Lower

Ordovician formations in southeastern Michigan and northeastern Ohio, and

the absence of Cambrian and Lower Ordovician rocks in Ontario.

Woodward

(1961) believed the Findlay Arch was present during the Lower Ordovician,.

while Janssens and Stieglitz (1974) postulated a Devonian age.

.

Lockett (1947) believed the Chatham Sag to be a breach in the

older Algonquin-Findlay Arches because of the subsidence of the adjacent

Michigan and Appalachian Basins.

Green (1957) believed the Algonquin and

Findlay Arches were a tectonically related continuation of the Cincinnati

Arch.

Sanford (1961) stated that there was no tectonic relationship to

the Algonquin and Findlay Arches.

Instead, he thought the Chatham Sag was

the result of a downthrown, faulted basement block.

Pirtle (1932) believed the Kankakee Arch had a Precambrian age and

was a southwest extension of the Wisconsin Arch.

Ekblaw (1938) be-

lieved this structure had a Lower or Middle Ordovician origin.

This

was later verified through the use of isopach mapping by Cohee (1945),

20

during the Salina, Bass Islands, and Detroit River times.

They also

stated that folding of the sedimentary rocks occurred intermittently

throughout the Paleozoic, with the greatest episodes of deformation

during the Late Mississippian and pre—Pennsylvanian.

The main struc-

tural traps were presumed formed "or at least sharpened" during these

times.

Fisher (1969) stated a Middle Ordovician origin for the present

basin.

This conclusion was later substantiated by Seyler (1974).

Catacosinos (1972, 1974) and Prouty (1970) have suggested that an embry-

onic Michigan Basin could have existed during the Late Cambrian.

Ells (1962, 1969) and Prouty (1970) have summarized notable

trends within the basin, including; (1) NW 9 SW folding with evident

lateral faults; (2) fairly definite radial-likefold patterns; (3)

persistent joint patterns at several rim locations (Figure 6).

Prouty

also concluded that the basic structural patterns of the basin, in-

cluding basement lineations and bordering structures, were inherited

from the Precambrian.

'

Moody (1973) attributed the brecciation and fracture-type por-

osity of the Albion-Scipio field to wrench faulting.

Harding (1974)

modeled strike-slip faulting in the laboratory and noted the similarity

of his divergent wrench model to Trenton structure of the Albion-Scipio

trend.

Prouty (1976) used LANDSAT imagery studies to conclude that

lineaments gleaned from the studies are shear faults, that most basin

folds are fault related, that the majorfaulting and folding occurred in

pre-Marshall9Mississippian time, and that the shearing stresses are

related to structural activity in the Appalachian region.

21

 

    

,.L/. 12’..L_'_{/.'_._:-- '

 

‘flUKJII/i:

a I .... LII—"..."
9

O

I

'L.'/ ,

t” 3‘...

all!

'\.. U

0 °

a

I.

i

i

I

%

'

A

.

u

\r

.

I

'\

n

'

Figure 6.

Major Structural Trends in the Michigan Basin

(compiled by'Prouty, 1971)

'

 

22

Hinze (1963) prOposed yet another origin for the Michigan Ba-

sin.

Using extensive gravimeter and magnetometer surveys of Michi-

gan's Lower Peninsula (Figures 7 and 8), he suggested that the basin may

have formed as the result of isostatic sinking in response to the added

mass of Keweenawan basic lavas in the basement complex.

Haxbe, Turcotte, and Bird (1976 proposed a related thermal con-

traction mechanism for the evolution of the Michigan Basin.

Their model

involved mantle diapirs rising to about the Moho, heating the lower

crustal rocks.

The heating caused a transformation of the meta-stable

gabbroic rocks to eclogite.

When the mantle rocks began to cool by con-

duction, the basin isostatically subsided under the load of the eclogite.

Merritt (1968) conducted a gravitational study of the Albion-

Scipio oil field and concluded that there was significant evidence for

petroleum production to be tied~in with a basement fault or fault line

scarp having around 800 feet of relief.

Hinze and Merritt (1969) noted that the magnetic map and the

Bouguer gravity anomaly map closely parallel the northwesterly trends

of the mid-basin anticlines.

They attributed this close alignment of

intrabasin structures and geophysical anomalies to lines of weakness in p

the basement complex that are associated with a rift zone filled with

basalts.

They noted that the dominant feature of the Bouguer gravity

anomaly map is the Mid-Michigan anomaly or "high" that transects the

Michigan Basin.

Shaw (1971) conducted a mobile ground magnetometer survey

of a portion of the Southern Peninsula of Michigan.

The survey area ran

east-west from Allegan County to St. Clair County.

He concluded

that the

basement in this area was dominantly granitic, with the exception of the

area of the Howell Anticline, which was interpreted as having a mafic

 

*

-

°

.-

'

'

n

'

-"

..

"'

I f

—

.

.

--

.

'.-

'

V .

Meal“ .1 loom“ d “on“ . lull". "no lam-n. . I".

run comm llfllflll n...“ ...

_'

hum-4 I1 mull Sum bimbo. Down-III u lam-I Iona-u-

!“an Fool-nu

0|

Imm-

houu nunu I. Ian-u

...-1

 

 

 

 

   

 
  

 

 

Figure 7.

Aeromagnetic Map of the Southern Peninsula of Michigan

(from Hinze, 1963)

   

M~Mmuew,uc I elem:

Ilean-

“"-

5f

o

,

'

.

-

-

.

.

-. § 8

'

nee-u um" "I! I”

_

sue-In

-

PM ‘5' “duke! Sum emu“. he I!

new... "rel meme u a sale 0111...,“

c of I u u
ma'..'.

'

'

"

‘1’

'

“

/.. \ ‘7‘
_
t

.

.

,
._

an .0 Ion" e0 lumuum I. Cod-cued

Cy

mum.

,

.

.

Q

-

.

‘

. f

    

3.4. ‘V “

A

i

.

n. , .‘.m.:.::.':':m Lyman...»
CullIl ‘0

reel «out! 0! I." Ill-I

am ul

n y

‘

'

      N

       

l

‘

';

.

V:

V,

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 Figure 8.

Bouguer Gravity Anomaly Map

(from Hinze, 1963)

25

composition.

Oray et. a1. (1973) used geophysical studies to show that

the source of this anomaly was related to the Lake Superior Basin and

Keweenawan rocks associated with the Mid-Continent anomaly running from

Lake Superior to Kansas (Craddock, 1972).

Basement test lithologies have been summarized by Hinze and

Merritt (1969), Laaksonen (1971), and Fisher (1979).

Lithologies en-

countered include granite, granite gneiss, quartzite, redbeds or "gran-

ite wash," and diorite dikes.

Hinze et. a1. (1975) also stated that al-

tered mafic volcanic rocks (greenstones) were encountered in Presque

Isle County near the northern tip of the Southern Peninsula.

True ba9

salts have yet to be found.

Ocala and Neyer (1973) stated that geophysical evidence indi-

cates the Precambrian basement has been disturbed beneath and marginal

to the Mid9Michigan gravity anomaly.

Hinze et.al. (1975) stated that data

from outcrops, drill holes, and gravity, magnetic, seismic, and heat flow

investigations indicate that this anomaly is directly related to mafic

extrusive and intrusive rocks that "commonly‘ are in horsts flanked by

sedimentary basins."

Thus it would appear that the Mid-Continent and Mid-

Michigan anomalies and the Lake Superior Basin are part of a failed Ke-

weenan continental rift system (Cambray, 1979 et. al.).

Innes (1967) sug-

gested an analogy with the East African Red Sea rift system.

In 1970 the MObil 9 Messmore #1 (Livingston County, Sec. 11, T3N,

RSE) penetrated the Precambrian within the boundaries of the Mid-Michigan

gravity high.

The basement material consisted of quartzite rather than

basalt, although the state drilling record for this well records Cambrian

quartzite with "some pebbles...(and) a boulder of extrusive rock (ba9

salt?)" immediately above the Precambrian contact.

Hinze et. a1. (1975)

26

have interpreted the absence of basalt to the effects of the Grenville

Orogeny, which is believed to have affected this area "and subsequently

complicated and perhaps altered the basement geology so that the basalt,

at least locally, is not present."

In 1975 the McClure-Sparks et. al.#l well (Gratiot County, Sec. 8,

T10N, R2W) also penetrated the Precambrian of the Mid-Michigan gravity

high.

Here drillers encountered "granite wash" (redbeds), diorite dikes,

and possibly some basalt and slickensided material (State Drilling Recofid).

A summary map showing the Mid-Michigan gravity high, basement tests, and

Precambrian provinces may be seen in Figure 9.

Gregg (1979) studied one of the cores from the Sparks well.

He

stated that the granite wash consisted of interlaminated red siltstone and

gray sandstone derived from a granitic source region.

The sediments were

probably deposited in a fluvial or deltaic deposit, possibly a flood

plain.

Hinze et. a1. (1975) summarized several basalt-trough models in

their study, and Fisher (1979) has speculated that the Mid-Michigan gravity

high represents a rift or graben, with the Sparks well showing the possi-

bility of 5000+ feet of Precambrian (?) redbeds in its upper portion.

A

revised basalt-trough model is shown in Figure 10.

Fowler and Kuenzi (1978) suggest that the redbed sequences represent

shallow marine turbidites deposited.within the failed Keweenawan rift val-

1ey.

 

9 o .

a)

.

.

27

granite “73811 6

granite

9

N

\

quartzit

4

4.

4’

   

.quartzite

V
  

. quartzite .

Q

0

‘

g

a

0

’

U

_, 4

cCLURE-SPARKS #1

\’Edbed:/

 

/’

L.

1

 

 

3

 

. 7

   
 
‘

BIL-MESSMORE Mme-1

schist

§

R

Q

‘

§

Q

‘

i

..

§

‘

.‘

 

grani te

granite o

granite

\granite

.gr\ani\t:\

gneiss 0. gran

 

  

\ \

  

e LAKI’ (Ill 

Penokean 1 6 _ 1' 8.Keweenawan "Rift" 1. 05° 9 1.15 b.y-

El Central

b.y

I

I:

II no.

OE

1.2

_

1311.; E Grenville .8

-

1.1 b.y.

0

Precambrian Test

Dominant Struct.Trend

 

Precambrian Province - Lithology Map

Figure 9.

(modified from Hinze et a1 1975 and Fisher 1979)

 

 

 

 

28

 

 

A

A

A

A

I

A

A

A

l

A

!
:
8

 

 

“.... 7‘...‘ ..7:.: ‘

 

- .

   
 
 
   

E3 OUARTZITE

Eacfluuurt

IIIBAsALT

1'

‘6233

‘

3 11503503

Figure 10.

Revised Basalt-Trough Model

[modified'from Hinze et. a1. (1975) and Fisher (1979)]

REGIONAL STRATIGRAPHY

General

Group and formation names are based on the stratigraphic chart

shown previously (Figure 1).

Formation contacts were based on work

done by the Michigan Basin Geological Society (Fisher, et.al, 1969).

The Cincinnatian Series was subdivided using Lilienthal's stratigraphic

cross-sections (1978).

Cambrian-Lower Ordovician

The Post-Knox Unconformity plays an important role in the later

discussion of the Glenwood isopach.

Syrjamaki (1977) summarized the

literature on the Upper Cambrian-Lower Ordovician of Michigan in this

manner:

1)

The Post-Knox Unconformity occurred at the end of Prairie

du Chien time.

Thus, the Prairie du Chien, where present, has an ero-

sional surface.

2)

In Michigan, the Glenwood is transitional with the overlying.

Black River formation.

3)

Where the Prairie du Chien is missing, erosion has occurred

to the Trempealeau formation.

Several southeastern Michigan state drilling records list the

presence of the St. Peter Sandstone between the Glenwood Shale and the

Prairie du Chien Group.

However, Horowitz (1961) and Balombin (1974)

have shown the St. Peter to be limited to the western side of the state.

29

30

Catacosinos (1972, 1974) assigned this sandstone to the Jordan member

of the Lake Superior Group and/or the Prairie du Chien Group.

It should be noted that the writer was most concerned with ac-

curately picking the base of the Glenwood Shale rather than conclusively

identifying the underlying strata.

For an extensive review of the

Lower Ordovician in Michigan, see Syrjamaki (1977).

Middle Ordovician

Syrjamaki (1977) has demonstrated that the Wisconsin Arch served

as the source area for the Lower Ordovician New Richmond interval in the

Michigan Basin.

During Lower Chazy (Glenwood) time the source area ap-

pears to have shifted to the Appalachian borderland (Prouty, 1979, per-

sonal communication).

Seyler (1974) states that the Glenwood apparently

represents sediments derived from erosion of Upper Cambrian-Lower Ordo-

vician formations and deposited by a transgressing Middle Ordovician sea.

Catacosinos (1974) described the Glenwood of the Michigan Basin

as "an interbedded sequence of green shale, gray dolomite, thin sand-

stone, and limestone which everywhere lies unconformably on older rocks."

In southern Michigan he categorizes the Glenwood as a thin green shale

occasionally interbedded with thin sandstone beds.

The Glenwood "Extra Section" is an informal term coined by Cata-

cosinos (1972).

It supposedly refers to a basal limestone of the Black

River formation that can be picked on gamma ray logs and used as a strat-

igraphic marker on the eastern side of the Michigan Basin.

Syrjamaki

(1977) stated that he was able to trace this marker on gamma ray logs

north through Huron County and west through Lenawee, Hillsdale, and

Branch Counties.

However, he stated that outside of this area the curve

31

loses definition due to increasing thickness and changing lithology of

the Prairie du Chien, problems with the erosional contact of the Post-

Knoinnconformity, and unsure boundaries of the St. Peter Sandstone.

For this study, "standard" picks of the top and base of the

Glenwood were made using Lilienthal's cross-sections.

The Black River in the Michigan Basin generally consists of

light brown to grey, fossiliferous, dense to crystalline limestone and

dolomite.

Cohee (1948) and others have demonstrated localized second-

ary dolomitization around apparent fault and fracture zones, and New-

hart (1976) has shown that the unit as a whole becomes more dolomitic

toward the Wisconsin Arch.

Seyler (1974) states that a thin bed of very

argillaceous limestone and shale occur at the base of the Trenton and

top of the Glenwood.

Seyler (1974) used isopach mapping to show that during Black

River time, the region was an embayment of the Middle Ordovician sea

Open to the southeast and thickening locally in the southern Lake Huron

area.

He characterized the Black River sea as shallow, with the area

steadily subsiding, as shown by the thick carbonates and abundant fos-

sils.

The trenton in the Michigan Basin is lithologically similar to

the Black River.

It generally consists of light brown to gray, fossil-

iferous, crystalline limestone and dolomite.

It is generally more fos-

siliferous and demonstrates similar, though more pronounced patterns

of secondary dolomitization.

Of particular interest is the "mushroom?

ing" pattern of dolomitization and hydrocarbon migration below the im-

permeable Utica Shale.

In 1946 Landes wrote his classic paper on the

32

origin of secondary dolomitization, and tied in earlier theories for

magnesium-rich waters ascending fracture systems to the Trenton lime-

stone in the Lima-Indiana oil field of northern Ohio.

These ascending.

waters created secondary (epigenetic) dolomite, often having sufficient

secondary porosity for petroleum migration and entrapment beneath the

Utica Shale "caprock."

Newhart (1976) believed the driving force of

this mechanism in the Trenton-Black River of Michigan to consist of

water entering strata of the Wisconsin highlands, migrating down dip

through fracture systems and finally ascending fracture zones and faults

in the Michigan Basin.

He did not specifically name the formation(s)

that were most likely avenues for this fluid migration.

The regional Trenton structure map (Figure 11) is quite simi-

lar to the Precambrian structure map shown previously (Figure 5).

How-

ever dips of the Trenton strata are not as great due to thicknesses of

the Upper Cambrian and Middle Ordovician sections increasing basinward

(Brigham, 1971).

Mbre structural features in southeastern Michigan are

'apparent due to increased well control.

Seyler (1974) used isopach mapping to demonstrate that closure

of the Michigan Basin occurred during Trenton time.

He characterized

the Trenton sea as shallow, with the basin steadily subsiding as shown

by the abundance of fossils and thick carbonates.

Upper Ordovician

 

Nurmi (1972) studied the Upper Ordovician of the Michigan Basin.

He and Lilienthal (1978) divided the Upper Ordovician into units as shown

previously in Figure 2.

For convenience, Nurmi's units will be shown in

parentheses.

33

 

Figure 11.

Regional Trenton Structure

(from Fisher, 1972)

34

The Utica Shale (Unit One) is characteristically gray to dark

gray in the upper section and dark gray to black in the lower section.

Nurmi (1972) states that the entire unit becomes browner in the Lena-

wee County area, but still shows the trend of darkening toward the

base.

He also noted thin interbedded limestone stringers in the south-

eastern Michigan counties.

Nurmi (1972) stated that anomalous thickening and thinning of

this unit appear to be related to structures shown on the Trenton struc-

ture map.

He also noted that the Utica Shale (Unit One) thinned over

.the Howell and Northville anticlines.

The Albion-Scipio field evaluated

by Ells (1962) shows an anomalous thickening of this unit.

After pers-

onal communication with Ells (1972), Nurmi stated that the thickening

was probably "due to tectonic activity along 'The Trend' rather than the

solution-erosional feature described by Rooney (1966)" and later by

DeHaas (1979).

From fossil studies Nurmi concluded that the Utica Shale (Unit

One) represented a shallow near-shore environment.

(Unit Two) corresponds to the top 30 feet or so of the Utica

Shale.

Nurmi stated that it thinned toward the center of the basin

and over structures, and was at times difficult to pick.

Units One, Two, and the lower portion of Three correspond to

Nurmi's (Unit Three).

He described this sequence as a complex pat-

tern of lithologies that could have been subdivided in a number of ways.

In southeastern Michigan this sequence consists of gray to greenish-

gray shales interbedded with thin beds of gray, argillaceous limestones.

Nurmi states that the limestones thicken to the north and are dolomi-

tized in

southwestern Michigan.

The center of the basin is comprised

3S

predominantly of fossiliferous limestone with minor shale breaks, with

shale content increasing toward the basin margins.

He also noted that

this sequence was thickest in southeastern Michigan and speculated

that the shales in this area represented pro-delta terrigenous clas-

tics of the westward prograding Appalachian delta complex.

By study-

ing the fossil assemblage Nurmi concluded this sequence represented a

low intertidal through high subtidal environment.

The upper portion of Unit Three corresponds to Nurmi's (Unit

Four).

It is characterized as a massive, slightly argillaceous dark

brown limestone that is thickest in the basin center.

Bryozoans are

the dominant fossil.

Nurmi used bryozoan morphology to characterize

the depositional environment as shallow neritic below mean wave base.

Unit Four (Unit Five) has been characterized by Nurmi as a

sequence of interbedded carbonates and shales.

The carbonates tend to

be argillaceous in the center of the basin, and grade vertically and

laterally into dolomites.

Shales tend to be gray in the center of the

basin, grading vertically and laterally into gypsiferous red and green

shales.

Nurmi (1972) noted an anomalous thinning of this unit in the

northern St. Clair County — southern Ontario area and attributed this

to erosion rather than non-deposition, from isopach mapping_ and a

study of well cores.

Unit Five (Unit Six) in southern Michigan has been described by

Nurmi as a red shale.

The red color was attributed to hematite.

Oolites

were reported in Mason and Allegan Counties.

Nurmi concluded that these

facies represented a very shallow to intertidal depositional environ-

ment.

This highly oxidized environment could also be responsible for

the lack of fossil preservation (Nurmi, 1972).

Nurmi found anomalous

36

thickening and thinning in this unit closely corresponding to Unit Five,

and also attributed this to erosion.

It is interesting to note how closely these two authors have

correlated these units independently of each other.

Lower Silurian

The Lower Silurian Cataract Group is divided into the Manitoulin

and cabot Head formations.

The "Clinton" of the Michigan Basin is a

stratigraphic term carried over from the New York section and is com?

monly used in the petroleum industry.

It makes up the basal unit of

the Niagaran Series.

Potter (1975) studied the Lower Silurian in detail.

He char-

acterized the Manitoulin as a shallow water biostromal carbonate.

It

grades into the overlying Cabot Head Shale.

Potter demonstrated a re-

ciprocal thinning and thickening of these formations due to the nature

of their depositional environments.

The Manitoulin tends to thicken in

shallow water areas and thin in deeper water, while the Cabot Head's

clastic sediments tend to fill in lows and onlap onto higher areas.

Due to the gradational contact between formations the Cataract

Group as a whole was mapped for this study.

Potter (1975) characterized the Clinton Group as a tan to gray

dolomite, split to the southwest by a thin gray dolomitic shale.

The

Rochester Shale is part of the Clinton and is a good marker for the base

of the Niagaran.

The Clinton represents a shallow sea favorable for

cherty carbonate deposition with thin shale interbeds.

The Rochester

represents clastic materials derived from an eastern source region,

possibly entering through the Chatham Sag (Potter, 1975).

37

Middle Silurian (A92 Carbonate)

Mesollela et.al.(1974) have described the Niagaran Group, in-

cluding the A92 Carbonate.

It is characterized as a brown to grey car-

bonate that is highly laminated by algal mounds in some places.

Brigf

ham et.al.(1971) note that the A—2 Carbonate thins over Niagaran reef

complexes and reef pinnacles.

Middle Devonian (Dundee Formation)

Bloomer (1969) described the Dundee as a buff to brown to gray

finely crystalline limestone.

He also noted a breccia zone in the up-

per Dundee and dolomitic trends in the central and western portions of

the Michigan Basin.

In southeastern Michigan the Dundee lies immediately below the

glacial drift in Monroe and southern Wayne Counties (Figure 12).

Great

variability in Dundee thicknesses encountered in state drilling records

is due to difficulty in picking the Dundee-Detroit River contact.

38

OlAC!“

SUKIO'

 

Figure 12.

Dundee Isopach of Southeastern Michigan and

Southwestern Ontario.(from Brigham,

1971)

MAP INTERPRETATION

General

Thirteen iSOpach maps and three structure contour maps were

constructed during the course of this study.

The complete sequence

of Glenwood through Cataract Group and Clinton were iSOpached, plus

the Ar2 Carbonate and Dundee formation.

The top of the Trenton, A92

Carbonate, and Dundee formations served as datums for structure cone

tour maps.

The Middle Ordovician through Lower Silurian units are

the main emphasis of this study, with the Ar2 Carbonate serving as

an "intermediate" depth formation and the Dundee serving as a "shal-

low" formation for structural mapping.

Maps of Michigan's southeast quadrant were constructed using

a scale of one inch equals two miles.

This allowed structural and

stratigraphic features to be shown in great detail where there is good

well control.

Tops for the various units were picked, using Lilienthal

(1978) as the major reference.

The major structural and stratigraphic features of the region

and of this area of the basin have been recognized for many years and

were described in previous sections.

It is the point of this study to

examine the specific stratigraphic and structural characters of the

southeast quadrant and relate them directly to the stratigraphy, struc-

ture, and tectonics of the surrounding region.

39

40

Glenwood Isopach (Plate 1)

The Glenwood of this area ranges from five to 28 feet thick.

It is thickest in southern Lenawee County.

It thins slightly to the

east in.Mbnroe County and thins greatly to the north in washtenaw and

wayne Counties.

As the Glenwood was deposited over the Post-Knox Unconformity

surface, one would expect the thickness to reflect an irregular,

eroded topography.

This would explain the anomalous thickening_and

thinning that does not show up in any of the following maps with one

notable exception.

An area of thinning in 48 - 22 and 3E also appears

in several other maps and will be analyzed later.

Thickening due to fault movement is not readily apparent in

this map.

This may in part be due to sparse well control, but evi-

dance from later maps and cross-sections suggests that faults were not

active during this time.

Black River Isopach (Plate 2)

The Black River formation of this area shows a regional thick-

ness of 300 to 480 feet.

An anomalously thick area of 535 feet may be

seen in T28, R73 and will be discussed later.

The formation is thinnest in Jackson County and western

Washtenaw and Lenawee Counties.

It thickens greatly to the northeast

toward Lake Huron.

There is no indication of the presence of the

Findlay Arch during Black River time.

1

While it is impossible to state whether there was basin closure

at this time due to the small area actually mapped, the Black River

contours nonetheless suggest an open sea to the east.

41

Two areas of anomalous thinning may be seen in Monroe County.

This type of thinning may be explained in two ways.

It may represent

erosion of a positive area, or it may be due to a lesser rate of sub-

sidence of the area durinqueposition.

Brown (1980, personal communi-

cation) states that the Trenton-Black River contact viewed in cores ex-

tracted by Total Petroleum Inc. "suggest" the possibility of an uncon-

formity in southeastern Michigan.

On the other hand, if the Precambrian

basement is fractured and faulted as prOposed by Fisher (1969) and others,

the differential subsidence could be explained by basement blocks sub-

siding at varying rates.

The anomalously thick section centers around the Rovsek-Jorgensen

#1 well (Sec. 26, T28, R7E).

Well control demonstrates that the thick-

ening occurs very abruptly, suggesting a graben.

This trend of anoma-

lous, abrupt thickening shows up in numerous other isopach maps of the

area.

Figure 13 shows a north-south cross-section and Figure 14 shows

an east-west cross-section across the "Washtenaw Graben."

These cross-

sections reveal anomalous thickening in the Black River, Trenton, and

Cincinnatian Units 3 and 5.

The Utica and Cincinnatian Units 1, 2, and

4 do not show this thickening.

Thus it would appear that the periods

of anomalous thickening represent periods of differential subsidence

rather than steep dips off surrounding structures.

The subsidence could

be caused by basement blocks sinking at different rates.

3

Well control in the Trenton suggests that the graben trends

NW - SE,

parallel to Trenton production in the Northville field.

The

exact length of the graben cannot be determined from this same data, as

there is not enough well controlzflong its strike to determine end points.

Hashtonsu Co.
Inset-lists“ n at
Soc. 21 m m

 

‘ '“" ~ twat-Jew 01 ¢-—Llflll———-> c°""‘°"'"'""9" '1¢——9—“—o Ibmt-Enw '1

42

lssntsusu c.

“"""“0' CO-

Mucous»

Soc. 2572:mm

12 725 :7:

(state record)

Sec. 3 m 117:

cucrmrm

III? 5

.

.

“'Ir ,

mm

“KIM!” I." 5

I." ‘

am a

 

Figure 13.

North-South Cross-section across "Washtenaw Graben."

Hunts“. Co.

16 In“

Washtenaw Co.

Wayne

43

Sun-Nixon v1 4——_> Rovsek-Jorgensen 01(———__)20

3:11..

   

   

Motor Co.

Sec.

CATARACT

CINCINNATIAN

UNIT 5

ufl5h

UNIT 3

BLACK RIVER

   

Sec. 33 715 R55

Sec. 25 T25 R7E

  

 

WEST

  

r -

l

Figure 14.

East-West Cross-section across "Washtenaw Graben.

   

 

44

Its measured width on the Black River map is approximately five miles,

Near the Jorgensen well are two old wells drilled in 1937 that

may be useful in defining the fault system of the graben. Both report

shows of oil and gas that may be related to fracture-fault systems.

The Ypsilanti Development Co. - Voorhees #1 (Sec. 32, T28, R7E) is

located west of the Jorgensen well, and Darke Bros. - Truesdell #1

(Sec. 25, T28, R8E) is located east of the Jorgensen well.

While a

single fault could have been proposed between these two wells, the

writer believes that two faults running parallel to the Northville

trend would more readily explain the strike of the graben.

Trenton Isopach (Plate 3)

The Trenton formation of this area shows a regional thickness

of 270 to 440 feet.

As a general rule the formation in this area is

thinnest in the south and thickens northward.

Anomalous thickening of 535eret occurs again in the Jorgensen

well located in the Washtenaw Graben.

Anomalous thickening may also

be seen along the Northville trend and in T18, RlE of Jackson County.

The Jackson County area is currently being developed by Total, and was

a "tight hole" during the summer of 1980.

Two discoveries were made in

this area - the Total - Faist et.al.#l - 7 (Sec. 7, T13, RlE) and the

total - Faist et.al.#2 - 7 (Sec. 7, TlS, RlE).

Isopach contours in this

area also show great thickening, suggesting fault-related traps for pe-

troleum.

This would seem to make the Jorgensen well area a most interest-

ing site for future petroleum exploration.

One area of anomalous thinning is evident on this map.

This is

located at T45, R2E and 3E, directly above an area of thinning in the

45

Glenwood and below an area of thinning in the Cincinnatian Unit 5

Isopach.

While Trenton erosion could be proposed as the cause 9f

this (Rooney, 1966), the presence of "thins" in the same location

in three unrelated maps would again appear to be related to differ-

ential subsidence of basement blocks.

The anomalous thickening and thinning along the Northville

Trend appears in nearly all the remaining isopach maps, and will be

discussed with the Trenton structure map interpretation.

Seyler (1979) demonstrated that basin closure occurred during

Trenton time, with a depocenter in southern Lake Huron.

With the ex-

ception of the Washtenaw Graben, there is no abrupt thickening off any

structure.

This pattern of gradual regional thickening lends support

to Green's (1957) statement that the structural elements surrounding.

this area of the basin were stable with respect to basin subsidence,

rather than rising.

Utica Isopach (Plate 4)

 

The Utica formation of this area shows a regional thickness of

200 to 410 feet.

With few exceptions, the anomalous thickening and thin-

ning of this unit appear directly related to structures that have been

mapped using the Trenton top as the structural datum (Plate 14).

Anomalous thinning and thickening coincides with the Northville

Trend of Washtenaw and Wayne Counties.

However, the most spectacular

thickening and thinning may be seen along the structural trend previ-

ously identified as the Lucas - Monroe Monocline and northwest exten-

sion.

The Lucas - Monroe Monocline runs north-south along the Lenawee

and Monroe County borders.

It is in direct alignment with the

46

Bowling Green fault systems shown by Green (1957).

However, there has

.been much debate whether the Lucas - Monroe Monocline reflects an ex-

tension of the Bowling Green fault or is merely a flexure dipping,

steeply to the west.

The Utica Isopach map (Plate 4) shows the Utica thickening.

abruptly on the west side of the structure, particularly near the Michi-

gan - Ohio border.

This alone does not prove the existence of a fault,

and could be explained by a monoclinal flexure.

However, two areas of

anomalous thinning along the northwest extension are not as easily ex-

plained by this method.

This thinning is probably not due to erosion,

as the Utica - Cincinnatian contact is considered conformable.

The al-

ternative explanation of this thinningwould be a slower rate of subsi-

dence of these areas during deposition, possibly related to varying‘

rates of basement block subsidence.

The Washtenaw Graben area shows a normal, regional thickness at

this time and indicates a period of quiescence.

However, the Jackson

County area of T18 - RlE again shows anomalous thickening that is prob-

ably related to fault movements.

Cincinnatian Series

Unit One Isopach (Plate 5).

This map shows a regional thickness

 

of 60 to 160 feet.

Contours along the Northville Trend suggest slight

movement at this time, although no anomalous thickening or thinning is

present.

.Anomalous thickening is present along the Lucas - Monroe Mono-

cline.

However, unlike Utica time when the thickening occurred abruptly

to the west of this structure, the thickening now is seen abruptly to

the east.

This becomes very clear in an eastdwest cross-section across

47

the area (Figure 15).

It now becomes very difficult to account for these

changes in sedimentation patterns using a flexure or monocline.

An al-

ternative explanation would seem to be needed.

The answer can probably be found in the Trenton structure map

(Plate 14).

This map reveals a strong offset in the contour lines along

the Lenawee - Monroe County border, suggesting fault movement.

The

question then would seem to be whether this lateral offset in the con-

tour lines is due to shearing and/or vertical offset.

It has already been shown that the greatest thickness in the Utica

occurred on the west side of the Lucas - Monroe Fault.

This thickening

then diminished northward along the fault until a normal regional thick-

ness can be seen in Washtenaw County.

Figure 15 shows the Trenton - Black

River has a normal regional thickness in this area.

Therefore it would

appear that the movement occurred in the underlying strata, probably in

the Precambrian basement complex.

Figure 16 shows a diagrammatic structural cross-section across

the Lucas - Monroe Fault. A small area of the Trenton structure map is

shown below this diagram for reference.

Note that offset in the contour

lines can be explained partly by vertical fault movement in which the

western side sinks and slopes southward toward Ohio.

The apparent move-

ment then becomes left-lateral.

This can be easily demonstrated by

marking parallel contour lines on a sheet of paper and making a cut per-

pendicular or nearly so to the contours.

Then, holding the paper with

your hands on each side of the cut or "fault," lower the left or "west-

ern" side of the paper while holding the right side steady.

When viewed

straight on, the contours will show a left-lateral offset.

Len-Hes Co.

Lenawee Co.

Occidenul-Vlllu H <5——————————> Occidental-Schumcher ll \

[2 I! [as

g

0

'

_'_”"_._) "Mum—mum“ “ ‘

Sec. 16 TBS It)!

See.

1-35 I6!

  

   
  
  

 

Munroe Co.

Mourns Co.

10 9“"

9 uubuunm ll
     

a "Calla—Sm” u .1 ll (

k “U"

6 I75

   

charmer

   ILACI llVll

ILACI llVll   

TIDWOII

WEST

 

 

,3

..-
 

 

U

EAST

 

 

 

 

    

 

Figure 15.

East-West Cross Section across Lucas — Monroe Monocline

 

 

 

 

 

 

49

 

NW Ex

 

 

 

 

Structural

Cross-Soctlan across

Lucas-Monroe Fault (highly diagrammatic)

 

DTrootoo Fm.

 

h
t
r
o

  N
  

 

Trenton Structure MOD

‘— Iowllng Gross Fault

D U

 

OHIO

Figure 16.

Diagrammatic Structural Cross-section across Lucas - Monroe Fault

50

Figure 15 also demonstrates structural reversal, with great sub—

sidence to the west of the fault during Utica deposition, and subsidence

to the east of the fault during deposition of Cincinnatian Units One and

Two.

This is clearly illustrated in Figure 17, with the movement occur-

ring in the Precambrian complex.

(It should be noted that no wells

have been drilled to the Precambrian in this area.

Therefore vertical

offset in the Precambrian has not been proven).

Since greater total

subsidence occurred on the west side of the fault, the western block is

considered downthrown.

The Washtenaw Graben area again shows a normal regional thick-

ness, again indicating quiescence here.

The Jackson County area also

shows a normal regional thickness.

Unit Two Isopach (Plate 6).

This map shows a regional thickness

of 50 to 150 feet and is nearly identical to the Unit One Isopach.

Mi-

nor variations are found in the areas of Jackson County, the Washtenaw

Graben, Northville, and southeastern Wayne County.

Anomalous thickening may be seen in the Jackson County and Wash-

tenaw Graben areas, and probably represent fault-related subsidence as

discussed previously.

Anomalous thinning occurs over the Northville

Anticline, and probably represents thinning due to non-deposition as

a result of slower subsidence than the surrounding basin rather than

erosion or uplift.

Unit Three Isopach (Plate 7).

This map shows a regional thick—

ness of 60 to 120 feet.

Anomalous thickening occurs in the Jackson Coun-

ty and Washtenaw Graben areas in a fashion similar to the Unit Two Iso-

pach.

Anomalous thinning occurs over the Northville area, also as dis-

cussed in the Unit Two map.. The outstanding feature of this map is the

51

 

\.

\

Lmnm-Nknnn

Hunt

lenqum.

\

,2

.

 

I

\~ I

- Ts

\

I

/

~

'

1" ’

,

‘I \

400\

'

'

Utica Time

Lanna. Ce.

  

C’CI'V‘J ’

\

\

 

‘

"' ‘l

I

’

I

’x i" ‘

 

 

liilhuumflwhn

 

NVV Emmnflon-a‘

\

l

Una-

-Nhnnurfinut

LomnuulCo.

/

 

T/I“

\ and ‘

.g

.

.

/ .JL

1' /

1' 1

Nhnnano

Cincinnatian Time

\ ‘

/

/

\

“ ‘

\///‘

 

I

L\.

  

\

 

Figure 17.

Structural Reversal across the Lucas - Monroe Fault

52

normal regional thickness displayed over the Lucas - Monroe Fault, indi-

cating a period of quiescence for this feature.

Unit Four Isopach (Plate 8). This map shows a regional thickness

 

of 60 to 90feet.

The Washtenaw Graben and Jackson County areas show a

normal regional thickness, indicating quiescence in these areas.

Con-

tours over the Northville Trend apparently show some minor movement but

no unusual thickening or thinning is evident.

The trace of the Lucas -

Monroe Fault and northwest extension are evident, with a minor increase

in thickness of 20 feet on the east side of the fault indicating slight

subsidence.

Unit Five Isopach (Plate 9).

This map shows a regional thickness

 

of 10 to 80 feet.

It shows a regional thinning from west to east, or,

more generally, from basin center to basin margin.

This could possibly

be attributed to the basin simply "filling up" with sediment toward the

basin margin.

The area of the Washtenaw Graben is again anomalously thick,

probably due to further vertical fault movements.

The Jackson County

area shows a normal thickness and represents quiescence in this area.

The Northville Trend again shows some apparent minor movement, but no

unusual thickening or thinning.

The Lucas - Monroe Fault is not evident

at this time and indicates quiescence.

The northwest extension of the

'fault may have exerted slight control at this time, as the SO and 60

(foot contours in this area nose considerably over this feature.

One area shows slight anomalous thinning in T48, RBE.

The thin-

ning is only about ten feet, but it is of interest because it is direct-

ly over areas of thinning in the Glenwood and Trenton, suggesting a base-

ment block showing sporadic variation in subsidence rates compared to

53

the rest of the basin.

Cataract Isopach (Plate 10).

 

The Cataract Isopach represents the combined Manitoulin Carbon-

ate and overlying Cabot Head Shale.

Potter (1975) demonstrated recipro-

cal thickening and thinning in these formations, so interpretation of

the Cataract as a whole requires some degree of caution.

The map shows a regional thickness of 80 to 130 feet.

Contours

show thickening on the east side of the Lucas - Monroe Fault.

This could

possibly indicate subsidence of the eastern block.

However, the thick-

ening also corresponds roughly to the outline of the Ohio - Indiana Plat-

form described by Potter (1975).

He stated that this platform apparently

represents an extension of the Cincinnatian and Findlay Arches that did

not subside as fast as the surrounding basin.

If so, this area would

have been quite shallow and thus favor growth of carbonate producing or-

ganismm such as algae.

This would allow the Manitoulin to build up

thicker in this area, as Shaw (1975) demonstrated Niagaran reefs building

up in shallow areas that were influenced by structure.

Subdividing the

Cataract into the Manitoulin and Cabot Head formations would be needed

to prove this.

The Northville Anticline shows approximately 20 feet of thinning

over this structure.

The suspicion would be for the Manitoulin to

thicken over the structure (shallow environment) while the cabot Head

thins, but this would again require studying these individual formations.

The Jackson County area shows a normal regional thickness.

How-

ever, the Washtenaw Graben area shows a subtle thickening to the north-

west toward Livingston County.

This suggests a continuation of this

54

structure into Livingston County, with the northwest end sinking_

slightly while the southeastern end remains relatively constant.

This

will be further developed in the conclusion of this thesis.

An area of anomalous thickening occurs in the Peake—Anglemeyre

#1 well of Washtenaw County, Sec. 34, T48, R4E.

Approximately 2,000

feet southeast of this well is the Peake-Bohnenstiehl #1 well, located

in the same section.

When a structural cross-section was constructed

(Figure 18), the result showed that the anomalous thickening and struc-

tural offset could be explained by placing a near vertical fault be-

tween these wells.

The Pre-Clinton formations of the Anglemeyre well

show similar, though more subtle increases in thickness.

Fisher (1980,

personal communication) suggests that this period of normal faulting

probably represents a growth fault.

However, during Clinton time the

faulting shows a reversal.

This may tie in.with the structural reversal

shown previously across the Lucas - Monroe Fault, suggesting a change in

direction of the widespread regional forces that caused shearing movement

along the pre-existing planes of weakness in the Precambrian basement.

It is interesting to note that these wells fall directly on the northwest

extension of the Lucas - Monroe Fault.

Clinton Isopach (Plate 11).

The regional thickness of the Clinton varies from 10 to 30 feet.

It thins slightly in the general area of the Ohio - Indiana Platform, and

the 15 foot contour line along the Lucas - Monroe Fault and northwest ex-

tension shows slight movement during this time.

As the Clinton contains considerable carbonate, the buildup in the

Northville area may be due to a favorable shallow environment for

EAST

WEST

55

msnrsmw coum

zooo'

WASHTENAW couu'rv

PEAKE‘ANGLEMEYRE I <

 

% PEAKE'BOHNENSTIEL I

Soc. 34 T45 R4E
T

,

Soc 34 T45 R45

0
0
5
2

DATUM

ITOO' BELOW

0
0
0
3

 J.

 

 

KV NIAGARAN I CLINTON

CATARACT D CINCINNATIAN E UTICA

E TRENTON

Figure 18.

Structural Cross-Section Between Two Nearby Washtenaw Co. Wells

56

carbonate producing organisms.

A sample study would be a useful tool

'for explaining thickness variation and possible facies changes in the

Clinton.

A-2 Carbonate Isopach (Plate 12)

 

The A92 Carbonate shows regional thicknesses varying from 60 to

170 feet thick.

It makes up part of the Niagaran reef complex in south-

eastern Michigan on the St. Clair Platform (Ohio - Indiana Platform).

The reef complex consists of a massive reef, and pinnacle reefs as shown

by Autra (1977).

He further stated that A92 Carbonate thinning occurred

over massive and pinnacle reefs.

Thus it would appear that the regional

southern thinning in this area is directly related to the massive reef

of the St. Clair Platform, while sporadic isolated areas of thinning oc-

our over pinnacles.

An anomalously thick section may be seen on the southwest side of

the Northville production trend.

There are several ways to explain this.

Mesolella et. al. (1974) have shown that the Ar2 Carbonate thickens

in front of the massive reef complex.

Autra (1977) also speculates that

this could have been a downthrown area due to fault movement prior to

A92 Carbonate deposition.

Thus the anomalous thickness could merely be

the result of channel way filling.

It is interesting to note on this map that the major structural

‘feature of previous maps, the Lucas - Monroe Fault, is masked or perhaps

hidden completely.

However, the Northville Anticline finally exhibits

a clear structural picture, with the southwest side of the fault conclur

sively downthrown.

Previous maps suggested an anticline and fault trace,

but contouring still left much to the imagination.

57

Dundee Isopach (Plate 13)

 

The Dundee varies in thickness from 0 to 100 feet.

Truncation

occurs in Monroe County due to Pleistocene glaciation.

It is interest-

ing to note how closely the truncation alongthe Lenawee - Monroe County

border follows the Lucas - Monroe Fault.

The upthrown eastern side was

planed off by glacial activity, while the downthrown western side re-

tains much of its regional thickness.

Thickness appears to have been

greatest in southern Michigan over the St. Clair Platform.

The Northville Anticline and fault are not as well defined on

this map as on the A92 Carbonate.

This is probably due to a cOmbina-

tion relative quiescence during this time and poor well control, as

many state records seem to indicate difficulty in picking the top of the

underlying Detroit River Group.

Trenton Structure Map (Plate 14)

 

The Trenton structure map clearly defines the strike of the

Lucas - Monroe Fault and northwest extension as discussed earlier.

Con-

tours along the strike of the fault show considerable left-lateral off-

set that can be explained through vertical fault movement related to

basement shearing.

Contours along the northwest extension appear to re-

flect several narrow aligned anticlines.

This becomes more apparent in

the Utica Isopach, which appears to show a direct relationship to the

Trenton structure map.

The Northville Anticline is sometimes referred to as a southern

extension of the Howell Anticline.

However, the Northville Anticline is

apparently but one of a series of narrow aligned anticlinal structures

that make up the Howell Anticline system (Ells, 1962).

A close-up of

58

the Northville system is shown in Figure 19.

Gas is produced from

relatively high on structure, while oil is generally produced in

structural lows.

Isopach mapping reveals the southwest side to be

downthrown, indicating a fault with vertical displacement up to

1,000 feet (Newcombe, 1933).

The structure of this anticlinal system

is reflected in all the isopach maps constructed for this study.

The anticlinal’structures have two apparent explanations that

may be inter-related.

The structures probably reflect differentially

subsiding basement blocks as the result of basement shearing.

If so,

the resultant fracturing and brecciation along fault and structure planes

could serve as pathways for fluid migration.

These fluids could then

cause dissolution and dolomitization as pointed out by Landes (1946)

and others, creating collapse around the blocks and producing anticlinal

structures.

However, it is unlikely that such dissolution could create

features of the magnitude displayed in all the maps constructed for this

study (Fisher, 1980, personal communication).

A—2 Carbonate Structure Map (Plate 15).

The Ar2 Carbonate map shows a close similarity to the Trenton

structure map.

However, the Northville and Lucas - Monroe Fault

are not

as sharply defined due to the thicknesses of the underlying sediments.

Dundee Structure Map (Plate 16).

 

The Dundee structure map shows strong similarities to the pre-

ceding structure maps.

The Lucas - Monroe Fault is clearly defined by

Dundee erosion, with the Dundee of the upthrown east side having been

planed off by glaciation as discussed earlier.

The Northville and north-

west extension are considerably masked by thicknesses of underlying.

sediments.

This is particularly true of the Salina units, when the

59

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

e
«

7

00

\

X;

 

 

 

{Flt

\C’SNZ:

 

\\9i§i

 

 

\’°°*

   
 
  
 
 

 

K

 

 

RTE

Woolltoaaw Ca.

ROE

Wayne Co.

0 Oil Well

§ Gas Well

¢ Dry Hole

Figure 19.

Aligned Anticlinal Structures in the Northville System

 

 

60

major sinking of the Michigan Basin occurred (Fisher, 1969).

PETROLEUM OCCURRENCE

It appears that the most likely places for petroleum produc-

tion in this area of the Michigan Basin would be: (1) porous erosional

remnants underlyingimpermeable seals; (2) wedge outs along the basin

margin; (3) wedge outs around Silurian reef structures, and (4) porosity

traps associated with faulted structures.

Cases one and two are related to truncated Cambrian and Lower

Ordovician formations and the Post-Knox Unconformity, as pointed out

by Syrjamaki (1977).

The Glenwood could serve as an impermeable cap-

rock.

A Trenton unconformity has been suggested by Rooney (1966) and

others, with the Utica Shale serving as an effective caprock.

However,

(Newharn (1976) and others have suggested that patterns of dolomitiza-

tion and hydrocarbon accumulation are more closely related to faulting

and fracturing in the Trenton - Black River.

Case three has been described by Autra (1977) and many others.

Case four is considered to be the key to future Trenton - Black

River discoveries, as shown in the Albion-Scipio and Northville fields.

There are numerous apparently faulted areas in this area of the basin

that remain unexplored or apparently forgotten.

The Deerfield, Summerfield, and Macon Creek fields lie directly

along the trace of the Lucas - Monroe Fault and northwest extension.

Few of these wells have penetrated deeper than the top of the Trenton,

yet current exploration in these areas appears to be at a standstill.

61

62

Total Petroleum has made several discoveries in Jackson County,

TlS, RlE and T18, RlW during 1079-80.

This area was kept "tight" by

the company for as long as possible with Total employees showing.

"restrained" optimism for future development.

The deep sections shown

by the Rovsek - Jorgensen #1 well of Washtenaw County display remark—

able similarity to the Jackson areas in the isopach maps, suggesting.

similar fault related petroleum traps in Washtenaw County.

SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS

Brigham (1971) and Hinze et. a1. (1975) have constructed struc-

ture maps of the Precambrian surface.

It is granted that these maps

have sparse well control in most areas.

Nonetheless, the maps were con-

structed with most data based on gravity and magnetic surveys.

The re-

sulting regional Precambrian structure map_(Figure 5) bears a strik-

ing resemblance to the regional Trenton structure map (Figure 11) con-

structed by Fisher (1972).

The Trenton isopach and remaining post-

Trenton maps all showed an apparent direct relationship to the struc-

tures shown in the Trenton structure map.

Syrjamaki (1977) constructed

regional structure contour maps on the Middle Ordovician Glenwood meme

ber, Lower Ordovician Prairie du Chien Group, and Late Cambrian Trem-

pealeau formation, and these maps again mirrored the Precambrian and

Trenton structure maps.

Thus it would appear that Precambrian basement

structure has played a major role in shaping the developmental history

of the Michigan Basin.

Fisher (1969), Hinze and Merritt (1969), Prouty (1970), and many

others have concluded that the Precambrian basement is highly faulted.

These faults apparently extend up through the overlying sediments as

growth faults, as shown in the Peake-Anglemeyre #1 well (Figure 18).

The faults probably formed during the Precambrian as the result of the

Penokean Orogeny and Keweenawan Disturbance (Hinze et. al., 1975).

Hinze

et. a1. (1969, 1975) have prOposed that a rift zone was created during

63

64

the Keweenawan Disturbance.

This aborted rift zone is then visible

as the "Mid-Michigan Gravity High" seen in the Bouguer gravity

anomaly map (Figure 8).

The McClure - Sparks #1 and Mobil - Messmore #1 were deep tests

drilled within the area of the midéMichigan gravity high.

No basalt

was encountered as would be predicted.

However, extra thick sections

were encountered in the McClure - Sparks well where approximately

5,000 feet of probably Precambrian redbeds (Fisher, 1979) were encoun-

tered that could have been derived from erosion of a granite source re-

gion (Gregg, 1979) and deposited in the failed rift valley.

The Rovsek - Jorgensen #1 well was also drilled into the mid-

Michigan gravity high (Figure 20).

This well stopped in the Prairie du

Chien.

However, unusually thick sections were also encountered in this

well.

The Cataract Isopach (Plate 10) suggests subsidence was appar-

ently slowing in the Jorgensen.we11 during the Early Silurian.

Thus

the "Washtenaw Graben" that is visible in the isOpach maps of this study 4

appears to be an extension of the proposed rift zone.

The Jorgensen

well probably represents an area nearingthe end of the failed rift valley.

Thus it appears that the deep sections of the Rovsek - Jorgensen

well and the structural reversal of the Lucas - Manroe Fault present

strong evidence for vertical fault movement within the basin.

The Pre-

Clinton growth faulting and later reverse faulting of the Peake-Anglemeyre

well suggests that the forces responsible for creating the structural re-

versal of the Lucas - Monroe Fault progressed slowly up the fault, reach-

ing the Anglemeyre well by Clinton time.

The reversal itself is probably

due to a shift in direction of the regional forces that created basement

shearing along the pre-existing planes of weakness in the Precambrian

basement.

 -

we

l

0..

O000....

......O...‘....

O.

I

..

I

.

O......O

.....O...

 

 

......

....

......OOOOOO‘....

...

 

.......

"nun”
 

....O

.0

.0...00.0.00...0.

 

.0...

......

hs‘h“R3

 

 

 

do:sundown—ohIso;weooauauon.3one»:

x

66

Paris (1977) and other workers have directly related Appalach-

ian tectonics to the evolution of the Michigan Basin.

He concluded that

the development of the Howell Anticline and other fault-related folds

was due to compressional forces affecting lines of weakness in the Pre-

cambrian basement.

However, this raises the question of whether the Michigan Basin

' is a true tectonic basin.

It is centrally located on the continent quite

a distance from any folded mountains.

If one examines a.western tectonic

basin, such as the Denver Basin, the basin structures are found around the

basin margin rather than in the center of the basin.

It would appear that the Michigan Basin has been affected by more

generalized regional forces, perhaps from as far away as the Ouachita and

Appalachian regions (Fisher, 1980, personal communication).

These areas

»contributed forces that were transmitted through the Precambrian basement

and played a major role in shaping the evolution of the Michigan Basin.

Eardley (1962) states that the Ouachita system may be a westward exten-

sion of the Appalachian system.

The main thrusting in the Ouachita re-

gion occurred during the Late Pennsylvanian or Permian.

The Appalachian

region was subjected to three major orogenic events:

The Taconic Oro-

geny (Late Ordovician), Acadian Orogeny (Middle or Late Devonian), and

Appalachian Orogeny (Pennsylvanian).

Forces from these areas have un-

doubtedly played a role in shaping the evolution of the Michigan Basin.

However, to pin down the exact source and direction of tectonic forces

that affected the Michigan Basin would appear to be a difficult task.

As a result of regional tectonics, the Precambrian basement of

the Michigan Basin probably has an irregular surface due to shearing

activity.

Some blocks move up or down in relation to one another, while

67

others may have a dominant lateral component.

This in turn plays a major

role in forming the structures that are visible in subsurface mapping.

(Figure 21).

68

 

WEST

A

ALLEGAN

 

EAST

A.

HOWELL

ANTICLINE

,

   

   

57- cum

MONOCLINE

 

 

 

 

BASEMENT STRUCTURE

(highly diagrammatic)

  
 

(modified from Fisher (1979))

 

A’

Figure 21.

 

BIBLIOGRAPHY

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Autra, M. D., 1977, A Regional Study of the Niagaran and Lower Salina

of the Michigan Basin: Unpublished Master's Thesis, Mich. State

Univ.

Balombin, M. T., 1974, The St. Peter Sandstone in Michigan: Unpublished

Master's Thesis, Mich. State Univ.

Beards, R. J., 1967, Guide to Subsurface Paleozoic Stratigraphy of

Southern Ontario: Ontario Dept. of Energy and Resources Mgmt.,

Paper 67-2.

'

‘

Bloomer, A. T., 1969, A Regional Study of the Middle Devonian Dundee

Dolomites in the Michigan Basin: Unpublished Master's Thesis,

Mich. State Univ.

‘

Bolton, T. E., 1954, Silurian of Manitoulin Island:

Mich. Basin Geol.

Soc. Annual Field Trip Guide Book, 1954.

Brigham, R. J., 1971, Structural Geology of Southwestern Ontario and

Southeastern Michigan:

Mines and Northern Affairs Petroleum Re-

Sources Section, Paper 71-2.

"

Burgess, R. J., 1960, Oil in Trenton Synclines: Oil and Gas Jour.,

Burns, D. B., 1980, Personal Communication, Total Petroleum Inc.,

Oklahoma Dist.

Buschbach, T. C., 1964, Cambrian and Ordovician Strata of Northeastern

Illinois: 111. State Geol. Survey, Report of Investigation 218,

90 p.

‘

Calvert, W. L., 1974, Sub-Trenton Structure of Ohio:

Amer. . Assoc. of

Petrol. Geol. Bull., Vol. 58, pp. 957-972.

'

Catacosinos, P. A., 1972, Cambrian Stratigraphy of the Lower Peninsula

of Michigan: Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis, Mich. State Univ.

, 1974, Cambrian Lithostratigraphy of the Michigan Basin: Amer.

Assoc. of Petrol. Geol. Bull. Vol. 57, pp. 2404-2417.

Cohee, G. V., 1947, Cambrian and Ordovician Rocks in Recent Wells in

Southeastern Mishigan: Amer. Assoc. of Petrol. Geol. Bull., Vol.

31, pp. 293-307.

69

7O

, 1948, Cambrian and Ordovician Rocks in Michigan Basin and Ad-

joining Areas:

Amer. Assoc. of Petrol. Geol. Bull., Vol. 32,

pp. 1417-1448.

, and K. K. Landes, 1958, Oil in the Michigan Basin, Habitat of

Oil:

Amer. Assoc. of Petrol. Geol. Symposium, pp. 473-493.

, 1965, Geologic History of the Michigan Basin: Jour. of Wash.

Academy Sciences, Vol. 55, pp. 211-223.

‘

Craddock, C., 1972, Late Precambrian, Regional Geologic Setting, in

Geology of Minnesota, a Centennial Volume: Minn. Geol. Survey,

Cummings, E. R., and R. R. Shrock, 1928, Niagaran Coral Reefs of Indiana

and Adjacent States and Their Stratigraphic Relations:

Geol. Soc.

America Bull., Vol. 39, pp. 579-620.

Dastanpour, M., 1977, An Investigation of the Carbonate Rocks in the

Reynolds Oil Field, Montcalm County, Michigan: Unpublished Master's

Thesis, Mich. State Univ.

DeHaas, R. J., 1979, Petroleum Potential of the Ordovician in the Michi-

gan Basin:

Mich. Basin Geol. Soc. Symposium, p. 8.

Eardley, A. J., 1962, Structural Geology of North America: 2nd Edition,

New York, Harper and Row, 743 p.

‘

Ehlers, G. M., and R, V. Kesling, 1957, Silurian Rocks of Michigan and

Their Correlations with Silurian Rocks of the Southern Lake Michi-

gan Area: Mich. Basin Geol. Soc., pp. 1 - 20.

, 1962, Silurian Rocks of Michigan and Their Correlation: Mich.

Basin Geol. Soc., Annual Field Excursion and Guide Book, 1962.

Ekblaw, G. E., 1938, Kankakee Arch in Illinois: Geol. Soc. America

Bull. Vol. 49, pp. 1425-1430.

Ells, G. D., 1958, Notes on the Devonian-Silurian in the subsurface of

Southwest Michigan: Mich. Dept. of Conserv., Geol. Survey Div.

Progress Report 18, 55 p.

, 1960, Silurian Oil and Gas Developments in Michigan: Mich. Dept.

of Conserv., Geol. Survey Div., 11 p.

, 1962, Structures Associated with the Albion-Scipio Oil Field

Trend: Mich. Dept. of Conserv., Geol. Survey Div., 86 p.

, 1969, Architecture of the Michigan Basin: Mich. Basin Geol. Soc.,

Annual Field Excursion Guide Book, pp. 60-88.

Evans, C. 8., 1950, Underground Hunting in the Silurian of Southwestern

Ontario: Geol. Assoc. Canada, Proc., Vol. 3, p. 55-85.

71

Fincham, W. J., 1975, The Salina Group of the Southern Part of the

Michigan Basin: Unpublished Master's Thesis, Mich. State Univ.

Fisher, J. H., 1969. Early Paleozoic History of the Michigan Basin:

Michigan Basin Geol. Soc. Annual Field Excursion, pp. 89-95.

, 1979, Structural History of the Michigan Basin: Mich. Basin

Geol. Soc. Symposium, p. 6.‘

Fowler, J. H., and W. D. Kuenzi, 1978, Keweenawan Turbidites in Michi-

gan (Deep Borehole Redbeds): A Foundered Basin Sequence Developed

During Evolution of a Protoceanic Rift System, Jour. Geophysical

Research, Vol. 82, No. B12, pp. 5833-5843.

Gardener, W. C., 1974, Middle Devonian Stratigraphy and Depositional

Environment in the Michigan Basin: Mich. Basin Geol. Soc. Spec.

Papers, No. 1, pp. 43-48.

Green, D. A., 1957, Trenton Structure in Ohio, Indiana, and Northern

Illinois: Amer. Assoc. of Petrol. Geol. Bull., Vol. 41, pp. 626-

642.

Gregg, J. A., 1980, Personal Communication, Mich. State Univ.

Gutstadt, A. M., 1958, Cambrian and Ordovician Stratigraphy and Oil and

Gas Possibilities in Indiana: Ind. Dept. of Conserv., Geol. Survey

Bull. No. 14, 103 p.

Hamrick, R. J., 1978, Dolomitization Patterns in the Walker Oil Field,

Kent and Ottawa Counties, Michigan: Unpublished Master's Thesis,

Mich. State Univ.

Harding, T. P., 1974, Petroleum Traps Associated with Wrench Faults:

Amer. Assoc. of Petrol. Geol. Bull., Vol. 58, pp. 1290-1304.

Hinze, W. 1., 1963, Regional Gravity and Magnetic Anomaly Maps of the

Southern Peninsula of Michigan: Geol. Survey of Mich., Report

of Investigation No. l.

, and D. W. Merritt, 1969,

Basement Rocks of the Southern Peninsula

of Michigan: Mich. Basin Geol. Soc. Annual Field Excursion Guide

Book, pp. 28-59.

, R. L. Kellogg, and N. W. O'Hara, 1975, Geophysical Studies of

Basement Geology and Southern Peninsula of Michigan: Amer. Assoc.

of Petrol. Geol. Bull., Vol. 59, pp. 1562-1584.

Horowitz, M. 1961, The St. Peter - Glenwood Problem in Michigan: Un-

published Master's Thesis, MiCh. State Univ.

Huh, J. M. 8., 1973, Geology and Diagenesis of the Salina - Niagaran

Pinnacle Reefs in the Northern Shelf of the Michigan Basin: Un-

published Ph.D. Thesis, Univ. of Mich., 253 pp.

72

Hussey, R. C., 1950, The Ordovician Rocks of the Escanaba-Stonington

Area: Mich. Basin Geol. Soc. Annual Field Excursion Guide Book,

24 p.

Hyde, M. K., 1979, A Study of the Dolomite/Calcite Ratios Relative to

the Structures and Producing Zones of the Kawkawlin Oil Field,

Bay County, Michigan: Unpublished Master's Thesis, Mich. State Univ.

Innes, M. J. 8., A. K. Goodacre, J. R. Weber, and R. L. McConnell,

1967, Structural Implications of the Gravity Field in Hudson Bay

and Vicinity: Canadian Jour. Earth Science, Vol. 4, pp. 977-993.

Jackson, R. P., 1958, Dolomitization and Structural Relations of the

Deep River, North Adams,and Pinconning Oil Fields, Michigan:

Unpublished Master's Thesis, Mich. State Univ.

Kilbourne, D. E., 1947, The Origin and Development of the Howell Anti-

cline in Michigan:

Unpublished Master's Thesis, Mich. State Univ.

Kirkham, V. R. D., 1937, Theory of Origin of Oil and Gas Bearing Folds

in Michigan and Theory of Origin of Oil and Gas:

Mich. Oil and

Gas News, May 15 Issue.

Laaksonen, H. J., 1971, Basement Lithology in Michigan as Determined

from Well Cuttings: Unpublished Master's Thesis, Mich. State Univ.

Landes, K. K., 1945, The Salina and Bass Islands Rocks in the Michigan

Basin: U. S. Geol. Survey Oil and Gas Inv. Prelim. Map 40.

‘

, 1946, Porosity Through Dolomitization: Amer. Assoc. of Petrol.

Geol. Bull., Vol. 30, pp. 305-318.

,

1951, Detroit River Group in the Michigan Basin: U. S. Ge61.

Survey, Circular #133.

Lilienthal, R. T., 1978, Stratigraphic Cross Sections of the Michigan

Basin: Mich. Dept. of Conserv., Geol. Survey Div.'

Lockett, J. R., 1947, Development of Structures in Basin Areas of North-

eastern United States:

Amer. Assoc. of Petrol. Geol. Bull., Vol.

31, pp. 429-446.

Lowenstam, H. W., 1950, Niagaran Reefs of the Great Lakes Area: Jour.

Geology, Vol. 58, pp. 430-487.

Melhorn, W. N., 1958, Stratigraphic Analysis of Silurian Rocks in Michi-

gan Basin:

Amer. Assoc. of Petrol. Geol. Bull., Vol. 42, pp. 816-

838.

Merritt, D. W., 1968, A Gravitational Investigation of the Scipio Oil

Field in Hillsdale County, Michigan, with a Related Study for Oh-

taining a Variable Elevation Factor:

Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis,

Mich. State Univ.

73

Mesollela, K. J., et. al., 1974, Cyclic Deposition of Silurian Carbonates

and Evaporites in the Michigan Basin: Amer. Assoc. of Petrol.

Geol. Bull., Vol. 58, pp. 34-62.

Michigan Geological Survey, 1964, Stratigraphic Succession in Michigan:

Mich. Geol. Survey, Chart 1.

Moody, J. D., 1973, Petroleum Exploration Aspects of Wrench-Fault Tec-

tonics: Amer. Assoc. of Petrol. Geol. Bull. V61. 57, pp. 449-476.

Newcombe, R. B., 1930, Middle Devonian Unconformity in Michigan: Bull.

Geol. Soc. of America, Vol. 15, p. 725.

, 1933, Oil and Gas Fields of Michigan: Mich. Geol. Survey, Pub. 38,

G. Ser. 32.

Newhart, R. E., 1976, Carbonate Facies of the Middle Ordovician Michigan

Basin:

Unpublished Master's Thesis, Mich. State Univ.

Nurmi, R. D., 1972, Upper Ordovician Stratigraphy of the Southern Penin- ‘

sula of Michigan:

Unpublished Master's Thesis, Mich. State Univ.

Ocala, L. A., and R. P. Neyer, 1973, Central North American Rift Sys-

tem - 1, Structure of the Axial Zone from Seismic and Gravimetric

Data:

Jour. Geophys. Research, Vol. 78, pp. 5173-5194.

Oray, E., W. J. Hinze, and N. W. O'Hara, 1973, Gravity and Magnetic

Evidence for the Eastern Termination of the Lake Superior Syncline:

Geol. Soc. America Bull., Vol. 84, pp. 2763-2780.

Paris, R. M., 1977, Developmental History of the Howell Anticline:

Un-

published Master's Thesis, Mich. State Univ.

Pinsak, A. P., and R. H. Shaver, 1964, The Silurian Formations of

Northern Indiana:

Ind. Dept. of Conserv., Geol. Survey Bull. #32.

Pirtle, G. W., 1932, Michigan Structural Basin and Its Relationship to

Surrounding Areas:

Amer. Assoc. of Petrol. Geol. Bull., Vol. 16,

pp. 145-152.

'

Potter, D. L., 1975, The Lower and Lower Middle Silurian of the Michigan

Basin:

Unpublished Master's Thesis, Mich. State Univ.

‘

Prouty, C. E., 1970, Michigan Basin-Paleozoic Evolutionary Development:

G. S. A. Abstr.,Vol. 2, Part 7, pp. 657-658.

, 1976, Michigan Basin - A Wrenching Deformation Mode1?:

Abstr.

with Prog., G. S. A. Vol. 8, No. 4, p. 505.

Rooney, L. F., 1966, Evidence of Unconformity at Top of Trenton Limestone

in Indiana and Adjacent States: Amer. Assoc. of Petrol. Geol. Bull.,

Vol. 50, pp. 533-546.

74

Sanford, B. V., and R. G. Quillian, 1959, Subsurface Stratigraphy of

Upper Cambrian Rocks in Southwestern Ontario: Geol. Survey Canada,

Paper 58-12.

, 1961, subsurface Geology of Ordovician Rocks in Southwestern

Ontario: Geol. Survey of Canada, Paper 6026, 54 p.

Seyler, D. J., 1974, Middle Ordovician of the Michigan Basin: Unpub-

lished Master's Thesis, Mich. State Univ.

Shaver, R. H., 1974, Structural Evolution of Northern Indiana during

Silurian Time:

MHch. Basin Geol. Soc., Annual Field Excursion

Guide Book, 1974.

Shaw, B., 1975, Geology of the Albion-Scipio Trend, Southern Michigan:

Unpublished Master's Thesis, Univ. of Mich., 63 pp.

Shaw, R. M., 1971, Mobile Ground Magnetometer Survey of a Portion of

the Southern Peninsula of Michigan:

Unpublished Master's Thesis,

Mich. State Univ.

'

Shrock, R. R., 1959, Wisconsin Silurian Bioherms (Organic Reefs): Bull.

of the Geol. Soc. of America, Vol. 50, pp. 529-562.

Stelzer, W. T., 1966, A subsurface Study of the Middle Ordovician Se-

quence in Ohio:

Unpublished Master's Thesis, Mich. State Univ.

Syrjamaki, R. M., 1977, The Prairie du Chien Group of the Michigan

Basin: Unpublished Master's Thesis, Mich. State Univ.

Ten Have, L. E., 1979, Relationship of Dolomite/Limestone Ratios to the

Structure of the West Branch Oil Field, Ogemaw Co., Michigan:

Unpublished Master's Thesis, Mich. State Univ.

Tinklepaugh, B. M., 1957, A Chemical, Statistical, and Structural Anal-

ysis 6f Secondary Dolomitization in the Rogers City - Dundee Forma-

tion of the Central Michigan Basin: Unpublished Ph. D. Thesis,

Mich. State Univ.

Workman, L. E., and A. H. Bell, 1948, Deep Drilling and Deeper Oil

Possibilities in Illinois:

Amer. Assoc. of Petrol. Geol. Bull.,

Vol. 32, pp. 2041-2062.

'

APPENDIX

TABLE 1..

CATALOG OF WELLS USED IN THE

SOUTHEAST QUADRANT OP MICHIGAN'S LOWER PENINSULA

Wells are arranged alphabetically by county.

Data was gath-

ered from state drilling records (SDR), gamma ray logs (GRL), and

samples (SMPL).

FormatiOn tops were determined by a study of the

data.

Information includes Principal Operator, Farm Name, Permit

#, Location, Elevation, and Total Depth.

Formation Abbreviations

DND -

Dundee

DTR -

Detroit River

CIN4

CIN3

-

-

Cincinnatian Unit 4

Cincinnatian Unit 3

A2C -

A-Z Carbonate

CIN2

-‘ Cincinnatian Unit 2

A22 -

A-2 Evaporite

CINl

-

Cincinnatian Unit 1

Alc

- A-l Carbonate

UTC

- Utica

NGR - Niagaran

TRN

- Trenton

CLN

CAT

-

-

Clinton

BLR

- Black River

Cataract (Cabot Head

GLW

-

Glenwood

and Manitoulin Fms.)

-

PDC

- Prairie du Chien

CINS -

Cincinnatian Unit 5

TRM

- Trempealeau

Jackson County

 

Operator:

Total

DND 2255

CINS 4152

TRN 4993

Farm:

Faist et a1 #1-7

DTR 2320

CIN4 4222

BLR 5212

PN: 32714

A20 3465

CIN3 4273

GLW 5572

Sec. 7, T18, RlE

AZE 3566

CIN2 4432

PDC 5585

SW-NE-NW

CLN 4018

CINl 4536

E1. 957 - TD 5653 (GRL)

CAT 4032

UTC

4602

Operator:

Total

DND 2257

CINS 4135

TRN 4928

Farm:

Faist et a1 #2 -7

DTR 2328

CIN4 4205

BLR 5189

PN: (not listed)

A20 3502

CIN3 4257

GLW 5543

See. 7, T18, RlE

A28 3580

CIN2 4408

PDC 5556

SW-SE-NW

CLN 4001

CINl 4464

El. 957 - TD 5601 (GRL)

CAT 4023

UTC

4532

75

76

Jackson County (continued)

Operator:

Total

DND 2229

CIN5 4130

TRN 4806

Farm:

Hankerd #1-17

DTR 2316

CIN4 4216

BLR 5161

PN: 33028

A2C 3524

CIN3 4266

GLW 5520

Sec. 17, T18, RlE

NGR 3596

CIN2 4380

PDC 5532

NE-NE-SE

CLN 3991

CINl 4445

E1. 975 - TD 5590 (GRL)

CAT 4011

UTC

4515

Operator:

Neyer &Mi11er

DND 2132

CIN5 3976

TRN 4660

Farm:

Dixon #1

DTR 2218

CIN4 4064

BLR 4994

PN: 21992

A2C 3381

CIN3 4114

Sec. 26, T18, RlE

NGR 3451

CIN2 4222

NE-NW-SE

.

CLN 3852

CINl 4296

E1. 923 - TD 5385 (GRL)

CAT 3866

UTC

4368

Operator:

Hammer Oil

DND 1793

CIN5 3370

TRN 4073

Farm:

Boone #1

DTR 1890

CIN4 3478

BLR 4411

PN: 21898

A2C 2736

CIN3 3504

GLW 4760

Sec. 26, T38, RlE

NGR 2809 .

CIN2 3614

PDC 4770

NW-NW-NE

CLN 3256 '

CINl 3688

El. 959 - TD 4903 (GRL)

CAT 3266

UTC

3760

Operator:

Mobil

Farm:

Clark #1

PN: 29944

Sec. 4, T38, R2E

DND 1934

DTR 2030

A2C 2913

NGR 2980

SE-NE-SE

'

E1. 1032 - TD 3511 (GRL)

Opr: American Hydrocarbons

DND 1776

CIN5 3400

TRN 4106

Farm:

Culbert #1

-

PN: 23399

A2C 2740

Sec. 22, T38, R2E‘

C-SW-SW

.

CLN 3282

E1. 962 - TD 4953 (SDR)

BLR 4455

GLW 4812

PDC 4814

Operator:

Reed

DND 1715

CIN5 3180

TRN 3887

Farm: Reed #1

PN: 21982

Sec. 7, T48, RlE

SE-SW-SE

CLN 3068

E1. 987 - TD 4566 (SDR)

BLR 4240

PDC 4561

Operator:

Cowen

DND 1748

CIN5 3229

TRN 3945

Farm:

Wellhoff #1

PN: 28305

"

A2C 2581

Sec. 10, T48, RlE

A2E 2644

C-SE-NE

CLN 3122

BLR 4271

GLW 4615

PDC 4624

.

E1. 996 - TD 4651 (SDR)

UTC

3621

77

Jackson County (continued)

Operator:

Cowen

DND

1733

CIN5

3228

TRN

3934

Farm:

DeLand Comm. #1

PN: 28460

A2C

2560

Sec. 10, T48, RlE

NE-SW-NE

3116

El. 989 - TD 4675 (SDR)

UTC

3616

BLR

4261

GLW

4602

Operator:

Carter

DND

1773

CIN 3280

TRN

3977'

Farm:

Randall #1

PN: 22066

2588

Sec. 11, T48, RlE

NW-NE-NW

CLN

3143

E1. 1006 — TD 4693 (SDR)

UTC

3475

Operator:

Gordon

DND

1715

TRN

3949

Farm:

Dermyre et a1 #1

PN: 28848

‘

A2C

2560

Sec. 11, T48, RlE

NW-NW-SW

E1. 1011 - TD

4637 (SDR)

CAT

3128

UTC

3615

Operator:

Cowen

DND

1755

Farm:

Wellhoff -#1-A

PN: 28492

'

A2C

2612

Sec. 11, T48, RlE

NW-SW-NW

3136

El. 1011 - TD 4718 (SDR)

UTC

3636

PDC

4628

TRN

3952

BLR

4287

'GLW

4626

PDC

4630

Operator:

Bayley Prod.

DND

1719

CIN5

3227

TRN

3928

Farm:

Hess #1

DTR

1800

CIN4

3310

BLR

4255

PN: 28705

A2C

2542

CIN3

3350

GLW

4614

Sec. 8, T48, RZE

AZE

2616

CIN2

3462

PDC

4617

NW-NW-SW

3104

CINl

3537

E1. 987 - TD 4671 (GRL)

CAT

3116

UTC

3609

Operator:

Otterbine

DND

1705

CIN5

3212

TRN

3908

Farm:

Baylis #1

PN: 22017

A2C

2582

Sec. 9, T48, R2E

SE-SE-NE

3093

E1. 964 - TD 4685 (SDR)

UTC

3591

BLR

4257

GLW

4602

PDC

4607

Operator:

Taggart

DND

1695

CIN5

3195

TRN

3884

Farm:

Watkins Farms #1

PN: 19444

Sec. 13, T48, R2E

SE-SW-SE

CLN

3065

E1. 1012 - TD 4700 (SDR)

GLW

4570

PDC

4576

78

Jackson County (continued)

Operator:

Ohio Oil

DND

1700

CIN5

3196

TRN

3891

Farm:

Watkins Farms #1

DTR 1790

CIN4

3266

BLR

4250

PN: 23656

Sec. 24, T48, R2E

A20

2576

A2E

2644

CIN3

3310

GLW

4592

CIN2

3425

PDC

4597

SW-SW-NE

'CLN

3069

CIN1

3500

El. 1051 - TD 4650 (GRL)

CAT

3078

UTC

3571

Lenawee County

Operator:

McClure

DND

1666

CIN5

2984

3702

Farm: Antczk & Sawyer #1

DTR

1756

CIN4

3066

PN: 22010

:

.

A2C

2399

CIN3

3126

BLR

4050

GLW

4350

Sec. 18, T58, RlE

AlC

2480

CIN2

3244

PDC

4363

SW-NW-NE

CLN

2884

CIN1

3294

E1. 1092 - TD 4427 (GRL)

CAT

2894

UTC

3366

Operator:

Bell 5 Gault

DND

1604

CIN5

2929

TRN

3652

Farm:

Wheaton #1

PN: 22781

A20

2317

Sec. 21, T58, RlE

SE-SE-NW

CLN

2828

E1. 1091 - TD 4420 (SDR)

GLW‘

4316

PDC

4321

Operator:

Bell & Gault

DND

1538

CIN5

2832'

3552

Farm: Kisner #1

'

DTR

1623

CIN4

2926

BLR

3892

PN: 22044

A2C

2258

CIN3

2992

Sec. 33, T58, RlE

AlC

2316

CIN2

3083

NW-SW-NE

CLN

2726

CIN1

3132

E1. 1080 - TD 4165 (GRL)

CAT

2737

UTC

3208

Operator: Farmers Oil

DND

1555

CIN5

2964

3680

Farm:

Myers Estate #1

CIN4

3045

BLR

4039

PN: 23277

A2C

2355

CIN3

3102

GLW

4355

Sec. 5, T58, R2E

CIN2

3224

PDC

4370

SW-NE-SW

CLN

2854

CIN1

3267

E1. 1006 - TD 4406 (GRL)

CAT

2865

UTC

3343

‘Operator:

St. Louis Pipe

DND

1412

TRN

3540

Farm: Dibble #1

PN: 3452

Sec. 16, T58,R3E

SW-NW-SW

2715

E1. 968 - TD 3645 (SDR)

CAT

2723

79

Lenawee County (continued)

Operator:

Reef Petrol.

CIN5

2641

TRN

3340

Farm:

Valkenburg #1-25

DTR

1394

PN: 31972

AZC

2013

Sec. 25, T58, R3E

SE-SE-NE

2527

E1. 890 - TD 4124 (SDR)

UTC

3000

BLR

3704

GLW

4052

PDC

4067

Operator:

Cambridge Oil

DND

818

CIN5

2436

TRN

3103

Farm:

Service #1

DTR

913

CIN4

2526

BLR

3464

PN: 28868

AZC

1842

CIN3

2590

GLW

3804

Sec. 2, T58, R4E

NGR

1916

CIN2

2691

PDC

3818

C-SW-SE

2323

CIN1

2734

E1. 895 - TD 4000 (GRL)

CAT

2334

UTC

2817

Operator:

Voorhees

DND

1115

TRN

3269

Farm:

Cove #1

PN: 7598

See. 8, T58, R4E

NE-SW-SW

E1. 834 - TD 4060 (SDR)

Operator:

McClure

DND

932

CIN5

2456

TRN

3149

Farm:

Allen #1

1049

CIN4

2520

BLR

3532

PN: 22886

AZC

1859

CIN3

2575

GLW3909

Sec. 14, T58, R4E

NGR

1931

CIN2

2690

PDC

3928

NE-NW-SW

E1. 872 - TD 4046 (GRL)

2342

2354

CIN1

2735

UTC

2814

Operator: Good &Good

DND

344

CIN5

2067

Farm:

DeLodder #GG-l

PN:24304

DTR

463

A2C

1495

CIN4

2115

CIN3

2161

Sec. 3, T58, RSE

AlC

.1540.

CIN2

2265

SE-SE-SW

CLN

1935

CIN1

2304

E1. 760 - TD 3555 (GRL)

CAT

1953

UTC

2381

2707

BLR

3091

GLW

3464

PDC

3478

Operator:

Gulf

DND

386

CIN5

1793

TRN

2650

Farm:

Gordon #1-9

DTR

496

CIN4

2046

BLR

3032

PN: 31792

A2C

1433

CIN3

2096

GLW

3424

Sec. 9, T58, RSE

AlC

1482

CIN2

2203

PDC

3440

SE-SE

1877

CIN1

2240

E1. 777 - TD 3800 (GRL)

CAT

1894

UTC

2322

Operator:

Michigan 011

DND

110

CIN5

1880

TRN

2545

Farm:

Craig #1

PN: 19333

Sec. 13, T58, R58

DTR

212

A2C

1290

NW-SE-SE

1751

E1. 710 - TD 2683 (SDR)

CAT

1766

80

Lenawee County (continued)

Operator:

Gulf

DND

250

CIN5

1956

TRN

2620

Farm:

Gilmore #1 - 15

DTR

360

CIN4

2010

BLR

3001

PN: 31919

A2C

1400

CIN3

2060

GLW

3393

Sec. 15, T58, RSE

A1C

1450

CIN2

2168

PDC

3411

SE-SW-NW

CLN

1842

CIN1

2209

E1. 760 - TD 3798 (GRL)

CAT

1856

UTC

2298

Operator:

McClure

DND

583

CIN5

2156

TRN

2820

Farm:

Earhart #1

PN: 22517

Sec. 17, T58, RSE

DTR

669

A2C

1580

NE-NE-SW

2040

E1. 798 - TD 3645 (GRL)

BLR

3190

GLW

3583

Operator:

McClure

DND

163

CIN5

1851

TRN

2517

Farm:

Preston #1

270

CIN4

1904

BLR

2878

PN: 22834

A2C

1294

CIN3

1960

GLW

3261

Sec. 23, T58, R5E

AlC

1344

CIN2

2060

PDC

3278

SE-NW-SE

E1. 721 - TD 3305 (GRL)

CAT

1734

1748

CIN1

2105

UTC

2181

Operator:

McClure

DND

180

CIN5

1880

TRN

2496

Farm:

Smitka #1

DTR

287

CIN4

1934

PN: 23315

AZC

1312

CIN3

1990

Sec. 23, T58, RSE

AlC

1360

CIN2

2089

SE-SE-SW

1751

CIN1

2136

E1. 711 - TD 2685 (GRL)

CAT

1762

UTC

2208

Operator: Socony Oil

DND

110

CIN5

.1755

TRN

2418

Farm:

Russell #1

PN: 3600

Sec. 25, T58, RSE

C-S—S

1645

E1. 699 - TD 2576 (SDR)

Operator:

Good &Good

DND

184

CIN5

1857

2525

Farm:

Preston #2

DTR

290

‘CIN4

1910

BLR

2898

PN:

24645

A2C

1306

CIN3

1960

GLW

3293

Sec. 25, T58,'R5E

AlC

1350

CIN2

2080

PDC

3306

SE-NW-SW

1740

CIN1_

2124

E1. 710 - TD 3400 (GRL)

CAT

1754

UTC

2196

Operator: Bernardt Oil

DND

160

CIN5

1876

Farm:

Steele #1

PN: 25641

Sec. 26, T58, RSE

DTR

270

AZC

1297

NE-NW-NE

1755

E1. 710 - TD 3032 (SDR)

TRN

2567

BLR

2898

81

Lenawee County (continued)

Operator:

Socony Oil

DND

110

CIN5

1910

TRN

2445

Farm:

Downing Estate #1

PN:

3353

1

Sec. 36, T58, R5E

NE-NE-SW

E1. 698

- TD 3437 (SDR)

Operator: Socony Oil

DND

106

CIN5

1889

TRN

2445

Farm:

McCarbery #1

PN:

2759

Sec. 36, T58, RSE

NW-NE-NW

E1. 694 - TD 2552 (SDR)

Operator:

Trolz

DND

1272

CIN5

2520

Farm:

Hawkins et a1 #1

DTR

1367

CIN4

2593

PN: 23838

A2C

1957

CIN3

2653

Sec. 20, T68, RlE

NGR

2036

CIN2

2770

SE-NW-SE

2414

CIN1

2820

E1. 979 - TD 3962 (GRL)

CAT

2427

UTC

2900

3257

BLR

3576

GLW

3886

PDC

3902

Operator:

Anderson Oil

DND

1320

CIN5

2640

3367

Farm:

Brooks et a1 #1

DTR

1408

CIN4

2714

BLR

3706

PN: 28168

A2C

2053

CIN3

2780

GLW

4024

Sec. 4, T68, R2E

NGR

2140

CIN2

2882

PDC

4042

NE-SW-SW

2531

CIN1

2940

E1. 1010 - TD 4076 (GRL)

CAT

2545

UTC

3014

Operator:

Lawton

DND

986

CIN5

2274

TRN

3002

Farm:

Drewyer

DTR

1072

CIN4

2345

BLR

3334

PN: 23751

A2C

1695

CIN3

2405

GLW

3660

Sec. 25, T68, RZE

NGR

1776

CIN2

2518

PDC

3630

NE-SE-NE

CLN

2166

CIN1

2562

E1. 864 - TD 3752 (GRL)

CAT

2182

UTC

2636

Operator:

Occidental Pet.

DND

1125

CIN5

2392

Farm:

Rupert et ux #1

DTR

1216

CIN4

2456

PN: 28529

A2C

1832

CIN3

2520

Sec. 29, T68, RZE

NGR

1910

CIN2

2631

SW-SE-NE

CLN

2287

CIN1

2677

E1. 930 - TD 3852 (GRL)

CAT

2303

UTC

2750

TRN

3115

BLR

3440

GLW

3757

PDC

3775

Operator:

McClure

DND

1103

CIN5

2394

TRN

3113

Farm:

Francourer #1

PN: 22112

A2C

1815

Sec. 18, T68, R3E

NW-NE-SW

2282

E1. 888 - TD 3900 (SDR)

BLR

3451

GLW

3793

PDC

3814

82

Lenawee County (continued)

Operator:

Bell 8 Gault

DND

1089

CIN5

2385

Farm:

Burnett et a1 #1

DTR

1170

PN:

21637

A2C

1845

Sec. 22, T68, R3E

NW-SE-NE

2278

E1. 849 -.TD 3605 (SDR)

TRN

3105

BLR

3417

Operator:

California Co.

DND

1030

CIN5

2307

Farm:

Mohr #1

DTR

1110

CIN4

2376

TRN

3037

BLR‘

3368

PN: 24515

A2C

1746

CIN3

2441

GLW

3702

Sec. 30, T68, R3E

NGR

1823

CIN2

2551

PDC

3716

C-SE-NW

2201

CIN1

2595

E1. 872 - TD 3764 (GRL)

CAT

2216

UTC

2676

Operator:

Marathon

DND

1045

CIN5

2327

TRN

3062

Farm:

Mohr et a1 #1

DTR

1124

PN: 24749

AZC

1730

Sec. 30, T68, R3E

C-SW-NE

2213

E1. 853 - TD 3795 (GRL)

Operator:

McCulloch Oil

DND

1016

Farm:

Barrow et ux #1-30

DTR

1092

PN: 28803

Sec. 30, T68, R3E

C-NE-SW

AZC

1716

NGR

1790

2180

E1. 854 - TD 3704 (GRL)

' CAT

2196

UTC

2696

CIN5

CIN4

CIN3

CIN2

CIN1

UTC

2286

2356

2418

2530

2572

2646

Operator:

Bell 6 Gault

DND

824

CIN5

2222

Farm:

Brenke #1

PN: 35807

Sec. 2, T68, R4E

SW-SW-SW

E1. 792 - TD 3752 (SDR)

DTR

926

A2C

1660

AlC

1790

CLN

2110

BLR

3394

GLW

3727

PDC

3741

TRN

3013

BLR

3344

GLW

3677

TRN

2918

BLR

3256

GLW

3660

PDC

3670

Operator:

Morriss

DND

87

CIN5

1870

TRN

2406

Farm:

Downing #1

PN: 19191

Sec. 1, T68, R5E

NW-NW-SE

-

CLN

1637

E1. 684 - TD 2492 (SDR)

Operator:

Morriss

DND

107

CIN5

1839

TRN

2421

Farm:

Downing #2

DTR

198

PN 19375

Sec. 1, T68, R5E

NE-NE-SW

E1. 683 - TD 2492 (SDR)

CAT

1737

83

Lenawee County (continued)

Operator:

Morriss

DND

107

TRN 2647

Farm:

Downing #3

DTR 177

PN:

19376

Sec. 1, T68, R58

SE-NW-SE

CLN 1720

E1. 680 - TD 2491 (SDR)

Operator:

Mutch

CIN5 1683

TRN 2353

Farm:

Downing #1-A

PN:

22865

Sec. 1, T68, R5E

SW-SE-NE

CLN 1568

El. 681 - TD 3025 (SDR)

Operator:

Barton

.

DND

520

CIN5 2075

TRN 2635

Farm:

Borton #2

DTR 595

.

PN:

130

Sec. 5, T68, R5E

SE-SE

'

CLN 1660

E1. 715 - TD 2830 (SDR)

CAT 1965

Operator: Withrow,Rogers

DND

325

TRN 2468

Farm:

Ross #1

7

DTR 385

PN:

3342

Sec. 23, T68, RSE

SE-NE-NE

CLN 1670

E1. 683 - TD 2593 (SDR)

CAT 1780

Operator:

Hall

DND

45

CIN5 1779

TRN 2355

Farm:

LaVoy #1

PN: 7634

Sec. 25, T68, RSE

SE-NE-NW

CLN 1528

E1. 678 - TD 2492 (SDR)

CAT 1673

Operator:

IMich. Pacific Oil DND " -

CIN5 1666

TRN 2250

Farm:

Busey #1

DTR

66

PN: 3793

Sec. 25, T68, R5E

NE-SE-SE

E1. 677 - TD 2505

CLN 1450

CAT 1627

Operator:

Bub Oil

DND ~432

CIN5 1793

TRN 2500

Farm:

Garno et a1 #1

DTR 503

PN: 26538

A2C 1198

Sec. 32, T68, R5E

SW-SE-SE

CLN 1688

E1. 684 - TD 3240 (SDR)

UTC

2132

GLW 3227

PDC 3239

84

Lenawee County (continued)

Operator:

W.K.Deve1. 00.

TRN

2490

Farm:

Weisinger #1

PN: None listed

Sec. 33, T68, R5E

NE-NE

E1. 710 - TD 2670 (SDR)

Operator:

Kernodle

DND

60

CIN5

1527

TRN

2116

Farm:

Trimmins Heirs #1

PN:

8319

Sec. 36, T68, RSE

NE-SE-NE

CLN 1330

El. 676 - TD 2216 (SDR)

Operator:

Neal

DND 1202

CIN5

2497

TRN

3115

Farm:

Dunigan #1

PN: 9800

Sec. 7. T78, R1E

NE-NW-NE

E1. 956 - TD 3175 (SDR)

CAT 2398

Operator:

Good & Good

DND 1029

CIN5

2184

TRN

2942

Farm:

Borck

PN: 25052

Sec.

28, T78; RlE

SE-SW-NE

E1. 912 - TD 3650 (SDR)

GLW

3550

PDC

3568

Operator:

Pannell

DND 1038

CIN5

2160

TRN

2929

Farm:

Weber #1

DTR 1138

CIN4

2240

BLR

3210

PN: 22716

A20 1582

CIN3

2294

GLW

3520

Sec. 29, T78, RlE

NGR 1658

CIN2

2410

PDC

3538

SW-SW-SW

CLN 2063

CIN1

2461

El. 912 - TD 3630 (GRL)

CAT 2077

UTC

2539

Operator:

Miller

DND

978

CIN5

2102

Farm:

Pike #1

DTR 1082

CIN4

2174

PN: 26309

A20 1574

CIN3

2232

2865

BLR

3139

GLW

3452

Sec. 33, T78, RlE

A10 1630

CIN2

2342

PDC

3472

SW-SE-NW

CLN 2000

CIN1

2390

E1. 882 - TD 3520 (GRL)

CAT 2016

UTC

2463

Operator:

Good 8 Good

DND

876

CIN5

2022

TRN

2781

Farm:

Siegfried #1

DTR 976

CIN4

2088

PN: 23723

A20 1504

CIN3

2147

Sec. 34, T78, RlE

A10 1568

CIN2

2259

NW-NE-SW .

CLN 1926

CIN1

2309

E1. 816 - TD 3420 (GRL)

CAT 1942

UTC

2384

BLR

3063

GLW

3376

PDC

3396

85

Lenawee County (continued)

 

Operator:

Hammer Oil

DND

903

Farm:

Wellnitz #1

DTR 1010

PN: 21822

A20 1509

Sec. 36, T78, RlE

NGR 1575

NW-SE-NW

CLN 1958

El. 855 - TD 3526 (GRL)

CAT 1976

CIN5

2057

CIN4

2120

CIN3

2181

CIN2

2290

CIN1

2339

UTC

2416

TRN

2811

BLR

3101

GLW

3412

PDC

3433

Operator:

Occidental

DND

914

Farm:

Seeburger #1

DTR 1020

CIN5

2144

CIN4

2208

TRN

2881

BLR

3198

PN: 28533

A20 1609

CIN3

2272

GLW

3526

Sec. 12, T78, R28

A10 1666

CIN2

2382

PDC

3548

NW-SW-NE

CLN 2040

CIN1

2428

El. 827 - TD 3575 (GRL)

CAT 2052

UTC

2504

Operator:

Ashland Oil

DND

932

CIN5

2138

TRN

2891

Farm:

Much #1

DTR 1040

CIN4

2202

PN: 26411

A20 1631

CIN3

2266

Sec. 13, T78, R2E

A10 1686

CIN2

2378

BLR

3200

GLW

3526

PDC

3548

SW-SE-SE

CLN 2033

CIN1

2424

E1. 840 - TD 3800 (GRL)

CAT 2044

UTC

2504

Operator:

Amer.Hydrocarbons DND 828

CIN5

2006

Farm:

Emerson #1

DTR 922

CIN4

2060

PN: 23737.

A20 1450

CIN3

2122

Sec. 27, T78, R2E

A10 1492

CIN2

2236

NW-NE-SE

CLN 1904

CIN1

2278

El. 840 - TD 3468 (GRL)

CAT 1914

UTC

2356

Operator:

A.P.A. Oil

DND

710

CIN5

1952

Farm:

Gemple #1

PN: 23087

Sec. 25, T78, R3E

DTR

773

A20 1429

SE-SW-SW

CLN 1846

E1. 753 - TD 3427 (SDR)

TRN

2752 .

BLR

3060

GLW

3340

PDC

3356

2697

BLW

2997

GLW

3362

PDC

3372

Operator:

Horizon Oil

DND

846

CIN5

2031

TRN

2777

Farm:

Meech 6 Griffith #1 DTR 943

CIN4

2086

BLR

3080

PN: 26876

A20 1531

CIN3

2150

GLW

3410

Sec. 30, T78, R3E

A10 1595

CIN2

2268

PDC

3424

SW-SE-NW

CLN 1928

CIN1

2303

E1. 799 - TD 3685 (GRL)

CAT 1938

UTC

2380

Operator:

Powell

Farm:

Iott #1

PN: 8254

Sec. 1, T78, R5E

SE

E1. 677 - TD 2304 (SDR)

CAT 1435

TRN

2234

86

Lenawee County_(continued)

 

Operator:

LaDu Oil

DND

320

CIN5

1790

TRN

2373

Farm: Long #2

PN: 983

Sec. 2, T78, R5E

SW-NE-NE

El. 708 - TD 3328 (SDR)

CAT

1660

Operator:

Bub Oil

DND

436

CIN5

1800

TRN

2485

Farm: Vanhaerents #1

PN: 23979

Sec. 4, T78, RSE

NW-SW-NW

1679

E1. 683 - TD 3246 (SDR)

BLR

2801

GLW

3211

PDC

3221

Operator: Bub Oil

DND

439

CIN5

1778

TRN

2488

Farm:

Seidel #1

PN: 23667

Sec. 5, T78, R5E

515

A20

1239

BLR

2798

GLW

3206

PDC

3214

SE-NE-NE

1674

E1. 683 - TD 3251 (SDR)

2118

Operator:

Bertson

DND

55

TRN

1985

Farm:

Heath #1

PN: 7870

Sec. 13, T78, R5E

SE-SE-SE

E1. 682 - TD 2091 (SDR)

Operator:

M.V.O.C. Inc.

CIN5

1592

TRN

2297

Farm:

Tape #1

PN: 24554

Sec. 14, T78, R5E

SE-SE-SE

CLN

1474

E1. 681 - TD 3112 (SDR)

Operator:

Bernhardt Oil

DND

CIN5

1282

TRN

2007

Farm:

Gerber #1

PN: 24541

A20

701

Sec. 24, T78, RSE

SE-SE-SE

1145

E1.690 - TD 2087 (SDR)

Operator:

M.V.O.C. Inc.

DND

121

CIN5

1505

TRN

2208

Farm:

Hoffman #1

PN: 24362‘

Sec. 24, T78, R5E

DTR

188

A2C

942

SW-SW-SE

CLN

1370

El. 691 - TD 2476 (SDR)

87

Lenawee County (continued)

Operator:

Bernhardt Oil

DND

CIN5

1274

Farm:

Gerber Estate #1

DTR

44

PN: 25016

AZC

728

Sec. 25, T78, T58

NE-NE-NE

CLN

1156

81. 687 - TD 2901 (SDR)

TRN

1993

BLR

2290

GLW

2691

PDC

2711

Operator:

LeBlanc

DND

Farm:

Fick #1

DTR

65

CIN5

2060

TRN

2309

PN: 8204

Sec. 26, T78, R58

S-SW-SE

81. 688 - TD 3128 (SDR)

Operator:

Bauer Bros.

DND

932

CIN5

2045

Farm:

Beal #1

PN: 24336

Sec. 3, T88, RlE

DTR

991

A20

1495

NE-SW-SW

CLN

1941

El. 873 - TD 3448 (GRL)

UTC

2402

GLW

3055

PDC

3075

2801

BLR

3075

Operator:

Good 6 Good

DND

917

CIN5

2054

TRN

2810

Farm:

Beal GG-l

'

DTR

1016

CIN4

2118

BLR

3082

PN: 23276

AZC

1536

CIN3

2174

GLW

3396

Sec. 3, T88, RlE

AlC

1594

CIN2

2288

PDC

3416

NE-NW-SW

CLN

1950

CIN1

2336

El. 874 - TD 3487 (GRL)

CAT

1968

UTC

2414

Operator:

Bauer Bros.

CIN5

2050

TRN

2806

Farm:

Moore #1

PN: 24491

Sec. 3, T88, R18

NW-NE-SW

81. 875 - TD 3446 (GRL)

BLR

3082

GLW

3403

Operator:

Sun Oil

DND

930

CIN5

2078

Farm:

Cisco #1

DTR

1035

CIN4

2142

TRN

2835

BLR

3110

PN: 23891

Sec. 4, T88, RlE

AZC

1564

A10

1617

CIN3

2200

GLW

3426

CIN2

2313

PDC

3446

NE-SE-NE

CLN

1976

CIN1

2364

81. 887 - TD 3603 (GRL)

CAT

1990

UTC

2442

Operator: The M000

Farm:

Walter #1

PN: 23652

Sec.18, T88, R18

DND

926

DTR

1026

A2C

1488

AlC

1544

CIN5

2012

TRN

2762

CIN4

2077

BLR

3028

CIN3

2130

GLW

3334

CIN2

2243

PDC

3353

SW-SE-NW

CLN

1903

CIN1

2290

81.872 - TD 3488 (GRL)

CAT

1917

UTC

2368

Lenawee County,(continued)

88

Operator:

Hackett

DND

736

CIN5

1821

Farm:

Lipe #4-1

PN: 24882

A2C

1302

Sec. 25, T88, RlE

NW-NW-NE

1706

81. 810 - TD 3238 (SDR)

UTC

2176

TRN

2576

BLR

2844

GLW

3175

PDC

3191

Operator:

Buck 6 Basin

DND

814

CIN5

1885

2648

Farm:

Ferris Comm. #1

DTR

913

CIN4

1950

BLR

2920

PN: 21916

A2C

1394

CIN3

2005

GLW

3241

Sec. 27,T8S, 818

AlC

1450

CIN2

2125

PDC

3262

NW-NW-NW

1792

CIN1

2166

El. 831 - TD 3352 (GRL)

CAT

1811

UTC

2240

Operator:

Neyer

DND

821

CIN5

1893

TRN

2655

Farm:

Brasher #1

DTR

925

CIN4

1957

BLR

2940

PN: 24905

AZC

1408

CIN3

2006

GLW

3237

Sec. 28, T88, R18

AlC

1468

CIN2

2120

3257

NE-NW-NW

CLN

1786

CIN1

2171

81. 832 - TD 3306 (GRL)

CAT

1800

UTC

2248

Operafor:

MOCO

DND

832

CIN5

1900

TRN

2653

Farm:

Flint Comm. #1

942

CIN4

1958

BLR

2933

PN: 25931

A20

1422

CIN3

2010

GLW

3224

Sec.31, T88, RlE

A10

1474

CIN2

2123

3244

NW-NE-NW

1792

CIN1

2170

El. 839 - TD 3306 (GRL)

CAT

1811

UTC

2246

'Operator:

Howard

DND

735

CIN5

1837

2593

Farm: Snyder #1

DTR

843

CIN4

1896

BLR

2874

PN: 23718

AZC

1370

CIN3

1953

GLW

3193

Sec. 20, T88, R28

AlC

1431

CIN2

2068

PDC

3215

NW-SE-NW

1743

CIN1

2110

El. 790 - TD 3284 (GRL)

CAT

1764

UTC

2194

Operator:

Basin Oil

DND

703

CIN5

1864

TRN

2593

Farm:

Snedicor et al #1

PN: 23527

A2C

1314

Sec. 17, T88, R38

SE-NE-SE

1732

81. 749 - TD 3281 (SDR)

BLR

2875

GLW

3230

PDC

3258

Operator:

Occidental

DND

602

CIN5

1743

TRN

2496

Farm:

Willet et ux #1

DTR

702

CIN4

1788

BLR

2784

PN 28531

A2C

1260

CIN3

1847

GLW

3124

Sec. 26, T88, R38

AlC

1330

CIN2

1962

NW-SE-SE

1636

CIN1

2007

81. 746 - TD 3147 (GRL)

CAT

1660

UTC

2089

89

Lenawee County (continued)

 

Operator:

Neptune Oil

DND

606

CIN5

1753

TRN

2492

Farm:

Raymond #1

PN: 23618

A20

1230

Sec. 27, T88, R38

88 - SE-SE

CLN

1638

El. 748 - TD 3191 (SDR)

UTC

2084

BLR

2767

GLW

3111

PDC

3130

Operator:

Sun Oil

Farm:

Jacob et a1

PN: (not listed)

Sec. 7, T88, R48

0-8

81. 711 - TD 1004 (GRL)

DND

574

DTR

678

Operator:

Buck 6 Basin

DND

570

CIN5-

1753

TRN

2508

Farm:

McClenathen et ux #1

DTR

657

CIN4

1798

BLR

2808

PN: 16693

A2C

1260

CIN3

1866

GLW

3147

Sec.18, T88, R48

AlC

1326

CIN2

1980

PDC

3174

NE-NE-NW

1638

CIN1

2018

81. 717 - TD 3217 (GRL)

CAT

1656

UTC

2104

Operator:

D.O.H.I. Oil

DND

215

Farm:

Farrow #1

.PN: 1167

Sec. 13, T88, 858

SE-NE

1467

81. 696 - TD 1477 (SDR)

Operator:

Ogden Oil

315

TRN

2217

Farm:

Fachett #1

PN: (none listed)

Sec. 28, T88, RS

N - SW

CLN

1400

81. 700 - TD 2325 (SDR)

Operator:

8ckert

DND

310

CIN5

1479

2198

Farm:

Taylor #1

PN: 10448

Sec. 32, T88, 858

SE-NE-SW

1373

81. 715 - TD 3902 (SDR)

BLR

2540

GLW

2900

PDC

2920

Operator:

Occidental

CIN5

1474

TRN

2187

Farm:

Schumacher et a1 #1

CIN4

1502

BLR

2491

PN: 28543

A20

966

CIN3

1554

GLW

2862

Sec. 34, T88, 858

AlC

1040

CIN2

1664

PDC

2879

NE-SE-SW

CLN

1372

CIN1

1705

81. 713 - TD 2930 (GRL)

CAT

1388

UTC

1784

90

Lenawee County (continued)

Operator:

Houseknecht Oil

DND

652

CIN5

1700

Farm:

Gillen #1

DTR

746

CIN4

1756

TRN

2460

BLR

.2726

PN: 23863

A20 1243

CIN3

1816

GLW

3038

Sec. 12, T98, 818

A10 1305

CIN2

1928

PDC

3052

NE-NE-NW

CLN 1606

CIN1

1970

81. 766 - TD 3139 (GRL)

CAT 1626

UTC

2048

Operator:

Neptune Oil

DND

597

CIN5

1718

TRN

2472

Farm:

Raymond Estate #1

DTR 694

CIN4

1762

BLR

2755

PN: 23295

A20 1250

CIN3

1826

GLW

3094

Sec. 3, T98, R38

A10 1304

CIN2

1940

PDC

3109

NW-NE-NE

CLN 1622

CIN1

1980

El. 752 - TD 3200 (GRL)

CAT 1645

UTC

2060

Monroe County

 

Operator:

Basin Oil

DND

99

Farm:

Kanitz et ux #1

DTR 153

PN: 22092

-

A20 1203

Sec. 13, T58, R68

A10 1254

CIN5

1819

CIN4

1850

CIN3

1896

CIN2

2014

2452

BLR

2829

GLW

3251

TRM

3260

SE-SE-SE

CLN 1689

CIN1

2071

81. 677 - TD 3343 (GRL)

.

CAT 1712

UTC

2126

Operator:

Bell 6 Marks

DND

171

CIN5

1855

TRN

2488

Farm:

Lennard #1

DTR 266

CIN4

1895

_ BLR

2868

PN: 23659

A20 1288

CIN3

1942

GLW

3274

Sec.15, T58, R68

’ A10 1345

CIN2

2056

3290

SE-SE-NE

CLN 1726

CIN1

2108

81. 682 - TD 3313 (GRL)

CAT 1749

UTC

2166

Operator: Huffmaster

DND

126

CIN5

1910

TRN

2512

Farm:

Bordine #1

PN: 3368

Sec.16, T58, R68

NW-SE-NW

CLN 1798

81. 701 - TD 2660 (SDR)

Operator: Olmstead

DND -

CIN5

1707

TRN

2325

Farm:

Frink #1

DTR

68

PN: 3667

Sec. 25, T58, R68

SW-SE-NE

CLN 1610

El. 672 - TD 2800 (SDR)

CAT 1641

UTC

2075

Operator:

Dayton

DND -

Farm:

Fasking #1

DTR

68

PN: 1097

1

Sec. 30,T58,

R68

NE-NE

El. 692 - TD 3398 (SDR)

91

Monroe County (continued)

Operator:

Bell 6 Marks

DND

60

CIN5

1903

TRN

2511

Farm:

Heath #1

PN: 23531

Sec. 4, T58, R78

DTR

132

A2C

1330

SE-SE-NE

CLN

1777

81. 658 - TD 3398 (SDR)

BLW

2896

GLW

3366

TRM

3378

Operator:

Dow Chemical Co.

DND

CIN5

1889

TRN

2462

Farm:

Grassley #1

DTR

100

BLR

2845

PN: 17767

Sec. 7, T58, R78

SE-SE-NW

1708

81. 680 - TD 3325 (SDR)

CAT

1836

Operator:

Humble Oil

DND

77

CIN5

.1884

Farm: McCrea Comm. #1

DTR

189

PN: 25606

A20

1320

Sec. 9,T58, R78

C-NW-NW

El. 689 thD 3255 (SDR)

1767

1787

UTC

2186

TRM

3285

TRN

2499

BLR

2858

Operator:

Collin

CIN5

1885

2480

Farm:

Denhard #1

64

PN: 19419

'

Sec. 10,TSS, R78

NW-NE-NW

1753

El. 667 - TD 2811 (SDR)'

CAT

1775

Operator:

Humble Oil

DND

130

CIN5

1829

TRN

2441

Farm:

Oger #1

DTR

228

CIN4

1844

BLR

2803

PN: 24405

A2C

1230

CIN3

1890

GLW

3206

Sec. 15, T58, R78

AlC

1296

CIN2

2006

TRM

3226

0-88-88

CLN

1703

CIN1

2068

81. 676 - TD 3260 (GRL)

CAT

1723

UTC

2126

Operator:

Simpson

DND

56

CIN5

1798

TRN

2420

Farm:

Jennings CG #1

DTR

120

CIN4

1820

BLR

2771

PN: 23532.

AZC

1194

CIN3

1863

GLW

3164

Sec. 22, T58, R78

AlC

1258

CIN2

1979

TRM

3184

NW-SE-NW

1674

CIN1

2036

81. 663 - TD 3280 (GRL)

CAT

1697

UTC

2098

Operator:

McClure 6 Mask

DND

CIN5

1799

TRN

2420

Farm:

Jennings #1

DTR

57

PN: 19227

Sec. 22, T58, R78

SE-NW-NW

CLN

1686

El. 665 - TD 2728 (GRL)

CAT

1708

BLR

2771

GLW

3200

TRM

3220

92

Monroe County (continued)

Operator: None listed

TRN

2430

Farm:

Leminard

PN: None listed

Sec. 16, T58, 8108

NW-NE

81. 580 - TD 2430 (SDR)

Operator:

Sturman

DND --

CIN5 1375

TRN

2000

Farm:

Chapman #1

PN: 11221

Sec. 29, T58, 8108

NE-NE-NW

CLN 1261

81. 597 - TD 2377 (SDR)

CAT 1277

Operator:

Cilley

Farm:

Huntley #1

PN: 549

Sec. 15, T68, 86E

W-NW

81. 695 1 TD 2100 (SDR)

Operator:

Morriss

DND

70

Farm:

Lidster #1

PN:

980

Sec. 18, T68, 868

NW-NW

81. 707 - TD 3160 (SDR)

BLR

2381

GLW

2846

TRM

2865

TRN

2227

2243

GLW

2953

2965

Operator:

Morriss

DND

77

CIN5 1560

TRN

2148

Farm:

Reau #1

PN: 957

Sec. 18, T68, 86E

SE-SW

El. 707 - TD 2262 (SDR)

Operator:

Morriss

DND

7O

CIN5 1555

TRN

2125

Farm: LaPointe 6 Dusseau #1

PN: 835

Sec. 19, T68, 86E

NE-NE-NW

81. 709 - TD 2253(8DR)

CAT 1440

operator:

Basin Oil

DND --

CIN5 1530

2118

Farm:

Dusseau 6 LaPointe #2 DTR 83

PN: 6798

Sec. 19, T68, 86E

SE-SE-NW

El. 676 - TD 2191 (SDR)

CAT 1434

93

Monroe County (continued)

 

Operator:

A.V. Oil

DND

64

CIN5

1404

TRN 2058

Farm:

Roe #2

PN 3637

Sec. 19, T68, R68

SE-SE-SW

CLN

1275

El. 676 - TD 2078 (SDR)

Operator:

McPheron

DND

CIN5

1470

TRN 2061

Farm:

Roe #1

DTR

60

PN: 2952

Sec. 19, T68, 86E

SE-SE-SW

El. 681 - TD 2110 (SDR)

CAT

1380“"

Operator:

McPheron

DND

CIN5

1416

TRN 2096

Farm:

Roe #6

DTR

80

PN: 7364

Sec. 19, T68, 86E

NW-NE-SW

CLN

1295

El. 676 7 TD 2160 (SDR)

Operator:

McPheron

DND

70

CIN5

1470

TRN 2072

Farm:

Gaertner #3

PN: 6767

Sec. 19, T68, 86E

NW-SW-SE

CLN

1290

El. 677 - TD 3137 (SDR)

Operator:

Clapsaddle et a1

DND

71

CIN5

1572

TRN 2118

Farm:

Resume #1

PN: 7301

Sec. 20, T68, 868

El. 675 - TD 2460 (SDR)

CAT

1473

Operator:

None listed

DND

38

CIN5

1563

TRN 2133

Farm:

Dundee Well

DTR

103

PN: None listed

Sec. 25, T68, R68

NE-NE

El. 680 - TD 2277 (SDR)

Operator:

Jetter Drilling_

DND

42

CIN5

1525

TR 2110

Farm:

Morrison #1

PN: 7836

Sec. 26, T68, 86E

NW-NW-SE

El. 677 - TD 2233 (SDR)

CAT

1442

94

Monroe County (continued)

 

Operator:

McPheron

Farm: Spahr #1

PN: 7716

See. 29, T68, 868

NW-NW-NW

CLN 1292

81. 675 - TD 2172 (SDR)

TRN

2073

Operator:

Rowe

DND -

TRN

2099

Farm:

Judit #1

PN: 12833

See. 29, T68, 868

NW-NE-SW

81. 676 - TD 2510 (SDR)

Operator:

Shiffman

DND

67

CIN5

1598

TRN

2039

Farm:

Bragg #1

PN: 7538

Sec. 29, T68, 86E

SW-SW-SW

El. 680 - TD 2147 (SDR)

Operator:

Shiffman

Farm:

Bragg #2

PN: 8847

'

-

.

Sec. 29, T68, R68

NW-SW-SW

81. 675 - TD 2125 (SDR)

TRN

2024

Operator:

Simon

DND

64

CIN5

1455

TRN

2042

Farm:

Rowe #1

PN: 7190

Sec. 30, T68, 868

NE-SE-SE

81. 678 - TD 2124 (SDR)

CAT 1352

Operator:

Dever

DND

62

CIN5

1371

TRN

2060

Farm:

Lauer #1

DTR 129

CIN4

1418

PN: 23850

A20

837

CIN3

1467

Sec. 30, T68, 868

A10

888

CIN2

1580

NE-NW-NW

CLN 1257

CIN1

1701

81. 678 - TD 2160 (GRL)

CAT 1270

UTC

1848

Operator:

Good 6 Good

DND --

CIN5

1353

TRN

2043

Farm:

Roe #1

PN: 22879

AZC

796

CIN3

1445

CIN4

1398

BLR

2393

Sec. 30, T68, R68

A10

844

CIN2

1559

NE-NE-SW

CLN 1235

CIN1

1680

El. 678 - TD 2437 (GRL)

CAT 1248:

UTC

1829

95

Monroe County (continued)

 

Operator:

A.V. Oil

DND -

CIN5 1455

TRN 2045

Farm:

Vandercook #1

DTR

56

PN: 2688

Sec. 30, T68, R68

NE-SE-NE

81. 680 - TD 2184 (SDR)

UTC 1850

Operator:

Berston

DND -

CIN5 1472

TRN 2055

Farm:

Mueller #1

DTR

80

PN: 12115

Sec. 30, T68, R68

SE-NW-NW

81. 676 - TD 2104 (SDR)

CAT 1376

Operator:

McPheron

DND -

CIN5 1503

TRN 2068

Farm:

Montry #5

DTR

85

PN: 9257

Sec. 30, T68, 868

NW-SE-SW

81. 677 - TD 2311 (SDR)

CAT 1355

Operator:

Vanco Oil

DND --

CIN5 1466

TRN 2052

Farm:

Montry #2

PN: 7393

.

Sec. 30, T68, R68

SW-SE-SW

CLN 1256

81. 678 - TD 2184 (SDR)

CAT 1376

Operator: Fisher-McCall Oil

DND -

CIN5 1535

TRN 1535

Farm:

Brunt #1

DTR

6O

PN: 7105

Sec. 30, T68, 868

NE-SW-SW

81. 679 -TD 2137 (SDR)

Operator:

Good 6 Good

DND

105

TRN 2064

Farm:

Halberstadt #1

PN: 7201

.

Sec. 31, T68, R68

SW-NE-NW

CLN 1070

81. 678 - TD 2265 (SDR)

UTC

1838

Operator:

McPheron

DND

9O

CIN5 1362

TRN 2040

Farm:

Duval #1

PN: 6965

Sec. 31, T68, R68

SW-NE-SW

CLN 1070

81. 675 - TD 2110 (SDR)

96

Monroe County (continued)

Operator:

Powell 6Gilbreath DND

56

CIN5 1483

TRN

2034

Farm:

Cain #1

PN: 7211

Sec. 31, T68, 868

NW-NE-SW

CLN 1238

El. 678 - TD 2150 (SDR)

CAT 1394.

Operator:

Good 6 Good

DND

60

CIN5 1472 _

TRN

2054

Farm:

Montry #4

PN: 8569

‘

Sec. 31, T68, R68

NW-NE-NW

81. 676 - TD 2144 (SDR)

CAT 1365

Operator:

Duffey

CIN5 1542

TRN

2184

Farm:

Russell Estate #1

PN: 8730

'

Sec. 5, T68, R78

SW-SW-SW

CLN 1381

81. 648 - TD 2286 (SDR)

UTC

1987

Operator:

Dow Chemical

Farm: Kapka #1

DTR

43

CIN5 1558

TRN

2233

PN: 19263

Sec. 7, T68, 878

NW-NW-SW

81. 667 - TD 2360 (SDR)

UTC 2156

Operator:

None listed

TRN

2150

Farm:

Norgard

PN: None listed

Sec. 8, T68, R78

NW-NW

81. 660 - TD 2150 (SDR)

Operator:

Bell 6Gault

TRN

2037

Farm:

Brossia #1

PN: 26755

Sec. 13, T68, R78

88

CLN 1258

81. 633 - TD 2116 (SDR)

Operator:

Morriss

Farm:

Elconin #1

PN: 11180

Sec. 1, T68, 898

NE-SW-SW

El. 590 - TD 1925 (SDR)

TRN

1985

97

DND

DTR

Monroe County (continued)

Operator:

Morriss

Farm:

Compau #1

PN: 13867

Sec. 12, T68, 89E

TRN

1895

BLR

2287

GLW

2745

TRM

2763

SW-SW-NE

CLN

1135

El. 592 - TD 2910 (SDR)

CAT

1155

UTC

1725

Operator:

Harvey

DND

CIN5 1377

TRN

2033

Farm:

Brackett #1

PN: 7471

Sec. 4, T78, 868

NW-NE-NW

81. 673 - TD 2270 (SDR)

CLN

1230

CAT

1244

Operator:

McDonald

Farm:

McCarty #1

PN: 7519

See, 6, T78, 86E

NE-NE-NE

CLN

1200

81. 677 - TD 2105 (SDR)

TRN

2007

Operator:

Berell Oil

CIN5 1760

TRN

1985

Farm:

Yape #1

PN: 7424

See. 7, T78, R68

SW-SE-NW

81. 680 - TD 2295 (SDR)

Operator: Ferguson6 Garrison

CIN5 1272

TRN

1963

Farm:

Shimp #1

PN: 25494

A20

666

Sec. 16, T78, R68

S-SE-SE

.

CLN

1150

81. 686 - TD 3671 (SDR)

CAI

1162

Operator:

Brailey Oil

Farm:

Ault #1

PN: 6610

Sec. 17, T78, 868

DND

DTR

NW SW NW

CLN

1240

81. 678 - TD 2850 (SDR)

CAT

1255

UTC

1810

Operator:

Rowe

Farm:

Bieber #1

PN: 15091

See. 18, T78, R68

DND

DTR--

SW-NW-SW

CLN

1225

El. 680 - TD 2016(SDR)

CAT

1236

UTC

1710

BLR

2300

GLW

2698

2720

TRN

1957

TRN

1931

98

Monroe County (continued)

Operator: Meredith 6 Merrill DND --

CIN5 1358

TRN

1947

Farm:

Bieber #1

PN: 19620

Sec. 18, T78, R68

NE-NW-SW

81. 684 - 'TD 2437 (SDR)

CAT

1265

UTC

1750

Operator:

Bernhardt Oil

DND

CIN5 1226

TRN

1944

Farm:

Allen #2

PN: 25378

Sec. 19, T78, R68

35

A2C

663

SW-SW-SW

1110

81. 688 - TD 2763 (SDR)

UTC

1701

BLR

2237

GLW

2650

TRM

2670

Operator:

Bernhardt Oil

DND

CIN5 1163

TRN

1881

Farm: Allen #1

DTR

24

BLR

2205

PN: 21076

Sec. 30, T78, 868

NE-NE-NW

CLN

1051

81. 687 - TD 2400 (SDR)

Operator:

Bernhardt Oil

DND

CIN5 1192

TRN

1910

Farm:, Rain #1

DTR

28

PN:

20803

Sec. 30, T78, 86E

NE-NW-NW

CLN

1078

81. 689 - TD 2382 (GRL)

Operator:

Dow Chemical 00.

DND

CIN5 1140

Farm:

Steuwe et ux #1

DTR

PN: 19563

Sec. 34, T78, 86E

NW-NW-SW

1020

El. 679 - TD 2199 (SDR)

CAT

1037

UTC 1637

1844

BLR

2131

Operator:

Parsons Bros

DND

CIN5 1317

TRN

1976

Farm:

Newcomb #1

PN: 19574

Sec. 4, T78, 878

NW-NE-NE

1190

81. 649 - TD 2179 (SDR)

CAT

1208

Operator:

Parsons Bros.

DND

CIN5 1335

TRN

2002

Farm: Howard #1

DTR

14

PN: 19823

Sec. 4, T78, R78

NW-SW-NW

1213

81. 659- TD 2124 (SDR)

CAT

1230

99

Monroe County (continued)

 

Operator:

Grand Oil

CIN5

1460

TRN

2009

Farm:

Waltz #1

BLR

2335

PN:

22475

A2C

767

Sec. 4,T7S, R78

NW-NW-SE

CLN

1343

81. 654 - TD 2443 (SDR)

Operator:

Grand Oil

DND

CIN5

1275

TRN

1938

Farm:

Bastian #1

PN: 22220

Sec. 9, T78, R78

NW-NE-NE

CLN

1153

81. 649 - TD 2350 (SDR)

Operator:

McClure

DND

CIN5

1247

1992

Farm:

Stotz-Williams #1

CIN4

1257

BLR

2409

PN: 25062

A20

624

CIN3

1286

GLW

2877

Sec. 10, T78, 87E

CIN2

1396

TRM

2890

SW-SW-NE

CLN

1112

CIN1

1530

81. 650 - TD 2989 (GRL)

CAT

1130

UTC

1691

Operator:

Basin Oil

' DND

Farm:

Metz Comm. #1

PN: 23024

A20

610

Sec. 12, T78, R78

SE-NE-SE

1037

81. 627 - TD 2659 (GRL)

CAT

1053

CIN5

1170

CIN4

1186

CIN3

1226

c182

1336

0181

1450

arc

1610

1831

BLR

2182

GLW

2610

TRM

2627

Operator:

Beck

DND

CIN5

1348

1948

Farm:

Sancrant #1

DTR.

38

PN: 7702

- Sec. 19, T78, 878

NW-SW-NW

1207

81. 669 - TD 5495 (SDR)

CAT

1225

Operator:

Strasburg Oil

Farm:

Hansberger #1

DND

DTR

PN: None listed

Sec. 5, T78, R88

NW-NW

El. 625 - TD

1989 (SDR)

CIN5

1300

TRN

1884

Operator:

Hack Drilling

Farm:

Weeman #1

DND

DTR

CIN5

1218

1870

CIN4

1228

BLR

2222

PN: 23356

A2C

566

CIN3

1248

GLW

2654

Sec. 6, T78, R88

AlC

644

CIN2

1364

TRM

2668

NW-SE-SE

1086

CIN1

1490

81. 641 - TD 2711 (GRL)

CAT

1103

UTC

1642

100

MOnroe County (continued)

 

Operator:

Parsons Bros.

CIN5 1268

TRN

1829

Farm:

Weeman #1

PN: 19573

Sec. 7, T78, 888

SW-SE-NW

El. 630 - TD 2313 (SDR)

BLR

2166

Operator:

Midwest Explor.

DND

TRN

1793

Farm:

Inklovich #1

PN: 28581

Sec. 9, T78, 888

88-NE-SW .

CLN

1200

81. 623 - TD 2549 (SDR)

Operator:

None listed

Farm:

Moore Well

PN:

None listed

Sec. ?, T78, 898

Not listed

DND

DTR

81. 585 - TD 1750 (SDR)

CAT

1060

CIN5

1150

1735

Operator:

Ashland Oil

DND

CIN5

1072

TRN

1780

Farm:

Nichols #1

PN: 26224

Sec. 5, T88, R68

0-88-88

A20

543

A10

619

953

81. 693 - TD 2777 (081)

CAT

967

CIN3

1130

CIN2

1230

CIN1

1385

UTC

1544

CIN4

1100

BLR

2103'

GLW

2504

2520

1917

BLR

2216

Operator:

Bernhardt Oil

DND

CIN5

1186

Farm:

Creque #1

DTR

45

PN: 21345

Sec. 6, T88, R68

SE-SW-SE

1063

81. 692 - TD 2424 (SDR)

Operator:

Bauer

Farm:

Berry #1

PN: 21731

Sec.16, T88, R68

DND

DTR

NW-SW-SE

CLN

915

El. 684 - TD 2321 (SDR)

Operator:

Bauer

Farm:

Madelinski #1

PN: 22423

Sec. 17, T88, R68

SW-SW-SE

81. 680 - TD 2516 (SDR)

DND

DTR

CLN

CIN5

1040

1741

BLR

2036

GLW

2504

2522

CIN5

1007

1724

BLR

2021

GLW

2478

2489

101

Monroe County (continued)

Operator:

Bauer

Farm:

Schaedler #1

DND

DTR

CIN5

1035

TRN

1750

BLR

2055

PN: 23307

Sec. 17, T88, R68

SE-SW-SW

CLN

915

81. 674 - TD 2076 (SDR)

Operator:

Smoots

Farm:

Rittner #1

PN: 22788

Sec. 18, T88, R68

DND

‘145

DTR

A2C

218

865

CIN5

1435

TRN

2146

BLR

2458

SE-SE-NW

1318

81. 697 - TD 2505 (SDR)

Operator:

Bauer Bros.

Farm:

Hillebrand #1

DND

DTR

CIN5

1115

TRN

1738

BLR

2037

PN: 24155

Sec. 20, T88, R68

SE-SW-NW

,

CLN

1015 .

81. 683 - TD 2500 (SDR)

Operator:

Sun 011‘

Farm:

Clampitt #1

'DND

DTR

PN: 5031

Sec. 28, T88, 868

NW-NW-NW

CLN

997

81. 690 - TD 2513 (SDR)

Operator:

Great Lakes Drlg.DND

Farm:

Fisher #1

DTR

22

80

PN:

22645

A2C

771

Sec. 31, T88, 86E

SE-SE-NW

CLN

1181

1711

BLR

2011

GLW

2471

2487

CIN5

1294

TRN

2034

81. 695 - TD 2233 (SDR)

UTC

1827

Operator:

Great Lakes Drlg.DND

CIN5

1070

1809

Farm:

Fisher #1

DTR

CIN4

1103

BLR

2133:

PN: 23373

A20

550

CIN3

1138

GLW

2523

Sec. 31, T88,868

AlC

630

CIN2

1243

2542

SE-SE-NE

CLN

961

CIN1

1396

81. 696 - TD 2579 (GRL)

CAT

977

UTC

1556

Operator:

Norton 6Tuttle

Farm:

Schultz #1

PN: 22117

See. 1, T88, R78

SE-SW-SW

DND

DTR

CLN

CIN5

1039

TRN

1711

BLR

2017

GLW

2477

2500

81. 636 - TD 2531 (SDR)

UTC

1607

102

Monroe County (continued)

Operator:

Dow Chemical

DND --

CIN5

1060

TRN 1733

Farm:

Yarger #1

DTR --

BLR 2005

PN: 19773

Sec. 2, T88, 878

SE-SW-SW

CLN

905

81. 642 - TD 2054 (SDR)

CAT

931

UTC

1620

Operator:

Amer.Hydrocarbons DND -

CIN5 1108

TRN 1813

Farm:

McBride #1

DTR --

BLR 2128

PN: 22737.

A20

495

'

Sec. 8, T88, R78

8-8W-NW-

CLN

973

_81. 668 - TD 2601 (SDR)

Operator:

Hess 6 Roy

DND

--

CIN5 1060

TRN 1757

Farm: Brunt #1

DTR --

PN: 381

Sec. 9, T88, 878

NE-NE

81. 642 - TD 2164 (SDR)

UTC

1500

Operator:

Erie Oil

DND

--

CIN5 1000

TRN 1690

Farm: Temperance

DTR --

PN: None listed

Sec. 31, T88 878

SE

81. 645 - TD 1755 (SDR)

CAT 870

Operator:

None listed

Farm: Bedford-Erie #2

PN: None listed

Sec. 36, T88, R78

E-NW

81. 595 - TD 1658 (SDR)

TRN 1598

Operator:

Kruidenier

DND -

CIN5

916

'

TRN 1544

Farm:

Potter et a1 #1

DTR --

PN: 15183

Sec. 22, T88, 888

NE-NW-NW

CLN

738

El. 577 - TD 1830 (SDR)

CAT

755

103

Washtenaw County

Operator:

Albers

DND 1522

CINS 3671

TRN 4338

Farm:

Kaiser #1

BLR 4691

PN: 25698

A20 2880

Sec. 6, T18, 838

SE-NE-NW

‘ CLN 3495

81. 969 - TD 4784 (SDR)

Operator:

Albers

DND 1527

CIN5 3646

TRN 4300

Farm:

Hannawald #1

DTR 1640

CIN4 3719

BLR 4744

PN: 28620

A20 2862

CIN3 3779

Sec. 6, T18, 838

A28 2942

CIN2 3906

NE-SW-SW

CLN 3295

CIN1 3949

81. 960. TD 5020 (GRL)

CAT 3307

UTC

4022

Operator:

Ohio 011

DND 1494

CIN5 3560

TRN 4220

Farm:

Cooper #1

DTR 1606

CIN4 3633

BLR 4637

PN: 19384

A20 2833

CIN3 3744

GLW 5044

Sec. 7, T18, 838

A28 2918

CIN2 3825

PDC 5054

SW-SW-SE

CLN 3407

CIN1 3870

81. 938 - TD 5154 (GRL)

CAT 3426

UTC

3936

Operator:

Dannemiller

DND 1723

CINS 3879

TRN 4660

Farm:

Prentice #1

PN: 25057

VAZC 3085

Sec. 18, T18, 83E

-

‘

C-SW-NW

CLN 3704

81. 939 - TD 4846 (SDR)

UTC 4379

Operator:

Simpson 6 Gulf

DND 1540

CIN5 3598

TRN 4270

Farm:

Wagner #1

‘

DTR 1630

CIN4 3682

BLR 4704

PN: 24161 '

A20 2873

CIN3 3739

GLW 5087

Sec. 22, T18, 838

A28 2945

CIN2 3863

PDC 5097

SW-SW-NW

CLN 3454

CIN1 3910

El. 961 - TD 5159 (GRL)

CAT 3474

.

UTC

3979

Operator:

Hunt

DND 1448

Farm: Weber et a1 #1-26

DTR 1567

PN: 32581

A20 2804

Sec. 26, T18, R48

CLN 3373

SE-SW-SW

'

81. 917 - TD 3401 (SDR)

Operator:

Hunt

DND 1397

Farm: Gooding-Douthat #1-24

PN: 32683

A20 2988

Sec. 24, T18, 858

NW-SW-SE

El. 938 - TD 3584 (SDR)

104

Washtenaw County (continued)

 

Operator:

Cities Service

DND

1470

Farm:

Brassow

PN: 29964

Sec. 28, T18, T58

NE-NE-SW

81. 959 - TD 3460 (GRL)

DTR

1567

A2C

2933

Operator:

Sun

DND

1558

CIN5

3536

TRN 4185

Farm:

Nixon #1

DTR

1650

CIN4

3606

BLR 4624

PN: 19371

See. 33, T18, 858

CIN3

3666

CIN2

3781

SW-SW-NW

3386

CIN1

3824

81. 952 - TD 4998 (GRL)

CAT

3406

UTC

3896

Operator:

Hunt

DND

1344

Farm: Whitmore Lake Devel.

DTR

1482

Goff #1-8

PN: 32734

A2C

3074

See. 8, T18,R68

SW-NE-NE

81. 922 - TD 3630 (SDR)

Operator:

Hunt

Farm:

Vose et a1 #1-26

PN: 32704

Sec. 26, T18, 868

SE-NW-SE

81. 979 - TD 3480 (SDR)

DND

1173-

DTR

1316

A2C

2934

Operator:

Taggart

DND

707

CIN5

3636

TRN 4247

Farm:

LeMaster #1

PN: 18796

Sec. 1, T18, 878

NW-SE-SE

.

81. 962 - TD 4397 (SDR)

CAT

3528

Operator:

Taggart

DND

695

CIN5

3630

TRN 4235

Farm:

LeMaster #5

PN: 19039

Sec. 1, T18, R78

NE-SW-SE

El. 954 - TD 4468 (SDR)

CAT

3510

UTC

3950

Operator:

Consumers Power

735

CIN5

3667

TRN 4274

Farm:

Sprenger et a1 #1

PN: 21142

A20.

2998

Sec. 1, Tls, R78

SWBSW-NW'

CLN

'3515

81. 986 - TD 4701 (SDR)

CAT

3557

105

Washtenaw County (continued)

Operator:

Consumers Power

DND

728

CIN5

3558

TRN

4105

Farm:

Buers #1

PN: 19240

A20

2910

Sec. 1, T18, R78

NE-NW-SW

3430

81. 977 - TD 4519 (SDR)

CAT

3462

Operator:

Consumers Power

DND

1562

CIN5

3676

TRN

4274

Farm:

Sprenger et a1 #1

DTR

1685

CIN4

3716

PN: 19088

A2C

3010

CIN3

3787

Sec. 1, T18, 87E

A28

3170

CIN2

3884

ss—swenw

.3. =-

3516

CIN1

3908

81.988 - TD 4478

(GRL)

UTC

3988

Operator:

Albers

Farm:

Merritt #1

PN: 19010

Sec. 1, T18, R78

SE-NW-NW

A2C

3055

A28

3231

El. 982 - TD 4881 (SDR)

CAT

3630

CIN 5 3750

TRN

4362

BLR

4769

Operator:

Taggart

DND

825

CIN5

3443

TRN

4040

Farm: Rider

PN: 19089

Sec. 2, T18, R78

NW-SE-SE

81. 974 - TD 4549 (SDR)

CAT

3320

BLR

4485

Operator:

Consumers Power

DND

1456

CIN5

3536

TRN

4085

Farm:

Cons. Power #105

DTR

1576

CIN4

3579

PN: 18949

See. 2, T18, R78

A20

2897

A28

3058

CIN3

3626

CIN2

3730

SE-SE-NE

CLN

3380

CIN1

3750

El. 984 - TD 4551 (GRL)

CAT

3416

UTC

.3814

Operator:

Rovsek

DND

1049

CIN5

3739

Farm:

Bulman #1

PN: 25759

A2C

3052

Sec. 2, T18, R78

NE-NW-SW

3581

El. 996 - TD 5377 (SDR)

UTC

4054

Operator:

Consumers Power

DND

745

CIN5

3495

Farm: Dolan #1

PN: 19064

A2C

2830

Sec. 2, T18, R78

NE-NE-SE

CLN

3312

El. 983 - TD 4508 (SDR)

CAT

3367'

TRN

4347

BLR

4806

GLW

5252

TRM

5258

TRN

4038

BLR

4474

106

Washtenaw County (continued)

Operator:

Consumers Power

DND

849

CIN5 3525

4116

Farm:

Fitzgerald #2

PN: 24318

A20

2750

See. 2, T18, R78

NE-SE-NW

CLN

3374

El. 1013 - TD 4430 (SDR)

UTC 3828

Operator:

Rovsek

DND

1038

CIN5

3768

TRN

4402

Farm:

Engel #1-A

,DTR

1131

CIN4

3816

BLR

4860

PN: 23743

A2C

3061

CIN3

3892

GLW

5270

Sec. 3,T18, R78

A28

3254

CIN2

3992

PDC

5275

NW-NW-SE

CLN

3610

CIN1

4012

81. 1040 - TD 5317 (GRL)

CAT

3640

UTC

4100

Operator:

Flemming

DND

1126

CIN5

3811

Farm: Taylor #1

1

PN: 19342

Sec. 3, T18, 878

SE-NW-NE

TRN

4424

BLR

4875

El. 1007 - TD 5200 (SDR)

CAT

3695

CIN5

3825

TRN

4436

Operator:

Zellman

DND

1236

Farm:

Baumgardner #1

PN: 19499

Sec. 8, T18, R78

NW-SE-NW

CLN

3665

81. 945 - TD 4706

(SDR)

Operator:

Albers

DND

1059

CIN5

3732

TRN

4340

Farm:

Isac

PN: 19820

Sec. 11, T18, R78

A20

3020

NW-NE-NW

3570

81. 953 - TD 4752 (SDR)

CAT

3601

Operator:

Collin

DND

839

CIN5

3463

Farm:

Brummel et a1 #1

PN 19254

A2C

2811

Sec. 12, T18, R78

SE-NW-SE

81. 937 - TD 4284 (SDR)

CAT

3350

Operator:

Consumers Power

DND

668

CIN5

3300

Farm:

Haray et al #1

PN: 18841

Sec. 12, T18, 878

W-NW-NE

81. 940 - TD 4445 (SDR)

CAT

3196

TRN

4078

BLR

4528

TRN

3892

BLR

4300

107

Washtenaw County (contined)

Operator:

Consumers Power

CIN5

3345

TRN

3922

Farm:

Butler et a1 #2

PN: 19166

A20

2648

Sec. 12, T18, 878

NE-SE-NE

81. 939 - TD 4564 (SDR)

Operator:

McClure

DND

1007

CIN5

3564

TRN

4168

Farm:

Noble #1

PN: 19121

Sec. 13, T18, R78

SW-SE-SW

DTR

1130

A2C

2883

'AZE

3092

CLN

3408

81. 875 - TD 4684 (SDR)

CAT

3434

Operator:

Union Drlg.

DND

1143

CIN5

3710

TRN

4318

Farm:

Voss Comm. #1

PN: 10141

See. 16, T18, 878

SW-NW-NE

3553

81. 915 - TD 6410 .(SDR)

CAT

3580

Operator:

West

Farm:

Rogers #1

PN: 18929 ‘

Sec. 23, T18, 878

DND

1024

DTR

1162

A20

2288

SE-SE-NW

3396

81. 883 - TD 4559 (SDR)

TRN

4153

Operator:

Chamness

DND

1009

CIN5

3520'

TRN

4117

Farm:

Troy Comm. #1

Sec. 27, T 18, 878

NE-SE-NE

3354

81. 886 - TD 6094 (SDR)

CAT

3382

Operator:

Johnson 6 Pew

DND

1364

CIN5

3344

TRN

4020

Farm:

Mohrlock-Shears Com.

DTR

1480

CIN4

3423

BLR

4430

PN: 19751

Sec. 14, T28, 83E

A20

2663

A28

2753

#1

CIN3

3476

CIN2

3604

CIN1

3654

NW-NW-SW

3214

UTC

3728

El. 993 - TD 4659 (GRL)

CAT

3232

Operator: Peake

DND

1272

CIN5

3227

TRN

3898

Farm:

Goers #1

DTR

1390

CIN4

3303

BLR

4319

PN: 24396

A2C

2538

CIN3

3360

GLW

4698

Sec. 25, T28, 83E

A28

2618

CIN2

3478

PDC

4710

NW-SW-NE

-

3091

CIN1

3530

El. 939 - TD 4758 (GRL)

CAT

3112

UTC

3596

108

Washtenaw County (continued)

Operator:

DeGenther

DND

1237

CIN5

3164

3814

Farm:

Wenk #1

PN: 19891

Sec. 33, T28, 848

SE-SW-SW

CLN

3020

81. 918 - TD 4758 (SDR)

CAT

3051

BLR

4236

GLW

4615

PDC

4625

Operator:

Worsley

DND

1045

CIN5

3067

TRN

3712

Farm:

Miller 6Holtz #1

PN: 19202

Sec. 28, T28, 858

NE-SW-NW

81. 890 - TD 4215 (SDR)

CAT

2960

Operator:

Colvin 6 Assoc.

DND

808

CIN5

3205

TRN

3798

Farm:

Meinzinger #1

DTR

930

PN: 11341

Sec.12, T28, R78

SE-NE-NW

CLN

3057

El. 818 - TD 5692 (SDR)

CAT

3090

Operator:

Rovsek

DND

644

CIN5

3045

Farm:

Jorgensen

#1

PN: 25714

.

Sec. 26, T23, R78 ‘

DTR

749

A20

2367

A28

2544

BLR

4235

GLW

4689

PDC

4696

TRN

3793

BLR

4332

CIN4

3234

CIN3

3280

GLW

4867

CIN2

3427

4874

NE-NW-NE

CLN

2873

CIN1

3447

81. 782 - TD 5002 (GRL)

CAT

2908

UTC

3510

Operator:

Ypsilanti Dev.Co.DND

714

CIN5

2956

TRN

3540

Farm:

Voorhees #1

PN: 3828

Sec. 32, T28, R78

NE-NE-SE

El. 788 - TD 3822

(SDR)

CAT

2816

Operator:

Lima

DND

714

CIN5

2956

TRN

3540

Farm:

Voorhees #1

PN: 3828

Sec. 32, T28, R78

NE-NE-SE

El. 788 - TD 2786 (SDR)

CAT

2816

Operator:

Sun

DND

1322

CIN5

3192

Farm:

Horning #1

PN: 18701.

‘

Sec. 1, T38, 838

NE-NE-NE

DTR

1430

A2C

2590

A28

2685

CLN

3057

81. 924 - TD 3256 (GRL)

CAT

3084

109

Washtenaw County (continued)

Operator: Petro-Min

DND

1844

CIN5

3460

Farm:

Whitaker et a1 #1

PN: 28911

A20

2734

Sec. 20, T38 838

NE-SE-NE'

CAT

3320

81. 995 — TD 5275 (SDR)

UTC

3842

Operator:

NY Petro-Min

DND

1812

CIN5

3428

Farm:

Widmayer #1-A

PN: 28990

A20

2702

Sec. 21, T18, R38

W-SE-SE

81. 980 - TD 5241 (GRL)

UTC

3808

Operator:

Bell 6 Gault

DND

1759

CIN5

3432

Farm:

Widmayer #1

PN: 28655

A2C

2732

Sec. 21, T38, R38

C-SE-SE

3293

81. 978 - TD 5206 (GRL)

UTC 3815

TRN 4152

BLR 4528

GLW 4897

PDC 4908

TRN 4121

BLR 4515

GLW 4857

PDC 4861

TRN 4127

BLR 4504

GLW 4862

PDC 4867

Operator:

Mic-McClure

DND

1238

CIN5

3112

TRN 3785

Farm:

Eisemann #1

DTR

1390

CIN4

3187

BLR 4207

PN: 21903

A2C

2460

CIN3

3240

Sec. 6, T38, R48

AlC

2521

CIN2

3354

C-NW-SE

2974

CIN1

3406

81. 967 - TD4392 (GRL)

CAT

2998

UTC

3474

Operator:

The Moco

Farm:

Kuhl #1

PN: 21309

Sec. 8, T38, 848

SWhSW-SE

DND

1252

DTR

1370

A2C

2490

A10

2551

3003

CIN5

3130

TRN

3802

81. 945 - TD 4271 (GRL)

CAT

3025

UTC

3496

Operator:

Rovsek

Farm:

Grau #1

PN: 27472

Sec. 8, T38, 84E

DND

1213

DTR

1334

A20

2433

AlC

2496

CIN5

3087

TRN 3762

CIN4

3158

BLR 4178

CIN3

3217

GLW 4555

CIN2

3328

PDC 4563

SW-SE-NE

CLN

2953

CIN1

3379

81. 957 - TD 4628 (GRL)

CAT

2977

UTC

3450

Operator:

Maj eske

DND

1218

CIN5

3119

TRN 3765

Farm:

Niehaus et ux #1

PN: 28782

Sec. 8, T38, R48

SW-NE-SW

CLN

2993

81. 948 - TD 3977 (SDR)

110

Washtenaw County (continued)

Operator:

Sun

DND

1272

CIN5

3185

TRN

3860

Farm:

Haab-Grau-Buss #1

DTR

1406

CIN4

3253

PN: 19608

A2C

2525

CIN3

3303

Sec. 8, T38, R48

AlC

2628

CIN2

3428

SW-NW-SW

3056

CIN1

3485

81. 942 - TD 4155 (GRL)

CAT

3079

UTC

3554

Operator:

Sun

DND

1206

CIN5

3009

TRN

3669

Farm:

Meyer #1

DTR

1328

CIN4

3082

BLR

4082

PN: 25607

A2C

2341

CIN3

3136

GLW

4457

Sec. 16, T38, 84E

AlC

2393

CIN2

3242

PDC

4465

NW-SE-SE

CLN

2877

CIN1

3294

81. 974 - TD 4524 (GRL)

CAT

2897

UTC

3368

Operator:

Majeske

DND

1524

'CINS

3315

TRN

4001

Farm:

DuRussel #1

DTR

1646

CIN4

3390

PN: 28534

AZC

2765

CIN3

3458

Sec. 17, T38, R48

NGR

2822

CIN2

3517

SW-NW-NW

CLN

3237

CIN1

3616

81. 935 - TD 4500(GRL)

CAT

3259

UTC

3694

Operator:

Majeske

DND

1730

CIN5

3443

Farm:

DuRussel #2

PN: 28596

Sec. 18, T38, 848

‘

SE-SE-SW

CLN

3308

81. 947 - TD 4682 (SDR)

Operator: Majeske

DND

1689

Farm:

DuRussel #3

PN: 28726

Sec. 18, T38, R48

NE-NW-SE

3288

81. 931 - TD 4655 (SDR)

4128

BLR

4530

TRN

.4118

BLR

4538

Operator:

Sun

DND

1252

CIN5

2991

TRN

3642

Farm:

Hoener #1

DTR

1364

CIN4

3048

BLR

4052

PN: 27099

A2C

2334

CIN3

3111

GLW

4429

Sec. 21, T38, R48

AlC

2384

CIN2

3216

TRM

4444

NE-SW-SE

2864

CIN1

3267

81. 1002 - TD 4502 (GRL)

CAT

2884

UTC

3339

Opr:Washtenaw Co.8d.Comm.

DND

1120

Farm: WCRC #2

PN: Brine

A20

2300

Sec. 23, T38, R48

NW-NE-SW

’

2768

81. 971 - TD 2772 (SDR)

Washtenaw County (continued)

Operator: Texaco

Farm:

Kuebler #1

PN: 27649

Sec. 28, T38, R5E

SE-NW-SW

111

DND

740

DTR

'857

AZC

1911

AlC

1963

CLN

2454

E1. 896 - TD 2503 (GRL)

CAT

2468

Operator:

Rovsek

DND

357

CIN5

2486

Farm:

Wabash RR #1

DTR

464

CIN4

2540

PN: 25482

AZC

1796

CIN3

2588

TRN

3076

BLR

3472

3876

Sec. 24, T35, R7E

A1C

1864

CIN2

2682

TRM

3887

SE SE NW

2350

CIN1

2714

E1. 694 - TD 3973 (GRL)

CAT

2376

UTC

2771

Operator:

Bayley Products

DND

1702

CIN5

3227

3928

Farm:

Hess #1

DTR

1800

CIN4

3310

BLR

4256

PN: 28705

AZC

2542

CIN3

3350

GLW

4614

Sec. 8. T48, R3E

AlC

2617

CIN2

3462

PDC

4618

NW NW SW

3104

CIN1

3537

E1. 975 - TD 4663 (GRL)

CAT

3126'

UTC

3609

Operator:

Trolz

Farm: Trolz

PN: 25950

Sec. 20, T48, R32

NW-SE-SW

DND

1638

1772

A20

2560

A10

2620

3029

E1. 1025 - TD 4640 (GRL)

CAT

3040

CIN5

CIN4

CIN3

CIN2

CIN1

UTC

3150

3200

3289

3408

3448

3522

TRN

3846

BLR

4209

GLW

4558

PDC

4570

Operator:

Michigan Oil

DND

1181

CIN5

2810

TRN

3475

Farm:

Gierbach

PN: 21249

A2C

2180

Sec. 21, T48, R4E

NW-NW-NW

CLN

2698

El. 854 - TD 3637 (SDR)

Operator:

Besko

DND

837

CIN5

2476

TRN

3160

Farm:

Allen #l-A

DTR

975

CIN4

2533

PN: 26204

A2C

1878

CIN3

2595

Sec. 27, T48, R4E

AlC

1938

CIN2

2710

BLR

3536

GLW

3889

TRM

3902

SW-SW-NW

5

CLN

2360

CIN1

2758

El. 864 - TD 4039 (GRL)

CAT

2374

UTC

2832

Operator:

Taggart

DND

1170

CIN5

2845

TRN

3397

Farm:

Curtis #1

DTR

1265

PN: 18777

Sec. 28, T4S, R4E

C-SW-SW

CLN

2710

E1. 859 - TD 3806 (SDR)

112

Washtenaw County (continued)

Operator:

Peake

DND

932

CIN5

2607

Farm:

Anglemeyre #1

DTR

1080

CIN4

2667

TRN

3322

BLR

3770

PN: 22349

A2C

1956

CIN3

2724

Sec. 34, T48, R4E

A1C

2006

CIN2

2840

NE-NW-NW

CLN

2362

CIN1

2890

E1. 918 - TD 3939 (GRL)

CAT

2413

UTC

2969

Operator:

Peake & Harvey

DND

896

CIN5

2444

TRN

3100

Farm: Bohnenstiehl #1

DTR

1020

CIN4

2504

BLR

3491

PN: 23380

A2C

1846

CIN3

2574

GLW

3862

Sec. 34, T48, R4E

AlC

1902

CIN2

2664

PDC

3878

SW-NW-NE

CLN

2330

CIN1

2710

El. 919 - TD 3951

(GRL)

CAT

2354

UTC

2786

Operator:

Sun

DND

650

CIN5

2401

3046

Farm:

Filsinger #1

DTR

822

PN: 19074

Sec.10,T4S, R5E

NE-NE-SW

2268

El. 859 - TD 3435 (GRL)

CAT

2300

Operator:

Good & Good

DND

533

CIN5

2301

Farm:

Marion GG-l

DTR

670

CIN4

2360

PN: 23921

A2C

1670

CIN3

2412

Sec. 14, T48, R5E

‘

AZE

1729

CIN2

2514

NW-NW-SE

2175

CIN1

2561

El. 795 - TD 3861 (GRL)

CAT

2199

UTC

2635

TRN

2945

BLR

3351

GLW

3756

3764

Operator: Good 5 Good

DND

578

CIN5

2325

TRN

2970

Farm:

Schowacko GG-l

DTR

727

CIN4

2384

BLR

3375

PN: 24714

.

Sec. 16, T48, R5E

A2C

1727

AlC

1768

CIN3

2440

GLW

3775

CIN2

2546

PDC

3784

NE-NE-NW

2200

CIN1

2590

El. 864 - TD 3856 (GRL)

CAT

2226

UTC

2663

Operator:

Leonard

DND

620

CIN5

2334

2985

Farm:

Schwocho #1

DTR

760

CIN4

2390

BLR

3394

PN: 26856

A2C

1723

CIN3

2442

GLW

3788

Sec. 17, T48, R58

AlC

1782

CIN2

2551

PDC

3802

SE-SE-SE

2206

CIN1

2595

El. 862 - TD 3934 (GRL)

CAT

2230

UTC

2672

Operator:

McClure

DND

690

CIN5

2358

TRN

2969

Farm:

Lindsley #1

DTR

802

PN: 19778

Sec. 32, T48, RSE

NW-SE-NW

El. 875 - TD 3475 (SDR)

113

Washtenaw County (continued)

Operator:

Basin

DND

375

CIN5 2132

TRN 2757

Farm:

Wanty #1

DTR 480

CIN4 2176

BLR 3154

PN: 22292

A2C 1474

CIN3 2226

GDW 3520

Sec. 28, T48, R6E

AlC 1539

CIN2 2350

PDC 3533

NE-NE-SE

CLN 2006

CIN1 2370

El. 721 - TD 3637 (GRL)

CAT 2026

UTC

2444

Operator:

Violette

DND --

CIN5 1945

TRN 2545

Farm:

Sanderson #1

DTR

70

PN:930

Sec. 26, T4S, R7E

N-S-SW

El. 674 - TD 2680 (SDR)

CAT 1845

Operator:

Hayes

Farm:

Hayes #1

PN: 26569

Sec. 2, T18, R83

SW-NE-SW

El. 806 - TD 3325 (SDR)

Operator:

Collin

Farm:

Whipple

PN: 18966

Sec. 4, T18, R8E

'

‘

Wayne County

DND

603

DTR 743

AZC 2798

A2E 2946

CLN 3308

'

DND

725

CIN5 3666

TRN 4303

DTR 800

A20 3020

NE-NE-NW

CLN 3542

El. 951 - TD 4695 (SDR)

CAT 3575

UTC

3940

Operator:

McClure

‘DND

728

CIN5 3711

TRN 4300

Farm:

Howell et a1 #1

DTR 880

PN: 18982

A2C 3015

Sec. 5, T18, R8E

NE-NE-NW

CLN 3540

E1. 964 - TD 4772 (SDR)

UTC

3865

Operator:

Sun Oil

DND

700

CIN5 3617

TRN 4225

Farm: Maybury Sanatorium#l DTR 854

CIN4 3658

PN: 19348

A2C 2986

CIN3 3753

Sec. 6, T18, R8E

A2E 3148

CIN2 3813

SE-SE-SW

CLN 3462

CIN1 3837

E1. 950 - TD 4720 (GRL)

CAT 3501

UTC

3925

Operator:

Taggart

DND

735

CIN5 3694

TRN 4299

Farm:

Dickinson et a1 #1

PN: 18995

Sec. 6, T1S, R8E

NE-NW-SW
E1. 963 - TD 4678 (son)

CLN 3542
CAT 3585

114

Wayne County (continued)

 

Operator:

Consumers Power

DND

648

CIN5

3264

TRN 3866

Farm: Terrill et ux #1

DTR

778

CIN4

3308

BLR 4312

PN: 19201

A2C

2620

CIN3

3390

Sec. 7, T18, R83

A23

2799

CIN2

3456

SWANE-SW

3116

CIN1

3478

31. 919 - TD 4491 (GRL)

CAT

3165

UTC

3571

Operator:

Union

DND

650

CIN5

3525

TRN 4137

Farm:

Ansell.

DTR

780

PN: 18897

Sec. 7, T18, R83

SE—NE-NW

3370.

31. 921 - TD 4521 (SDR)

CAT

3410

Operator:

Consumers Power

DND

594

TRN 3975

Farm:

Thomson #1

PN: 19241

AZC

2725

Sec. 8,TlS,R83

SW;SW¥SW

31. 862 - TD 4142 (SDR)

3234

Operator:

Woodson

DND

624

CIN5

3456

TRN 4075

Farm:

Lucier #1

PN: 19665

See. 9,TlS, R83

SWBSW¥SW

A2C

2788

A23

2970

‘3309

31. 860 - TD 4590 (SDR)

CAT

3344

BLR 4519

Operator:

Consumers Power

DND

645

CIN5

3318

TRN 3868

Farm:

Wayne Co. #1

PN: 19421

Sec. 16, T18, R83

NE-SWBSW

A2C

2692

A23

2858

31. 889 - TD 4439 (SDR)

CAT

3215

UTC

3564

BLR 4293

Operator:

Consumers Power

DND

606

CIN5

3295

TRN 3825

Farm:

Wayne Co. #2

PN: 19915

A2C

2630

Sec.16, T18, R83

SE-SE-SW

CLN

3129

31. 865 - TD 4380

(SDR)

CAT

3170

Operator: Consumers Power

DND

593

CIN5

3358

TRN 3955

Farm: Wayne Co. #3

PN: 20157

Sec.16,T1$, R83

SWBSE-SE

DTR

775

AZC

2701

A23

2868

3201

El. 860 - TD 4287 (SDR)

CAT

3244

UTC

3632

115

Wayne County (continued)

Operator:

Consumers Power DND

616

CIN5 3256

TRN 3857

Farm: Det.Hse of Correction#1 DTR750

BLR 4285

PN: 19362

A20 2604

Sec. 17,T18, R83

NE-SW‘NW

CLN 3116

El. 847 - TD 4349 (SDR)

UTC

3570

Operator:

Consumers Power DND

708

CIN5 3320

TRN 3946

Farm:Det.Hse of.Cor. #2

DTR 840

PN: 19432 ‘

'

A2C 2668

Sec.17, T18, R83

SW‘NE-SW

CLN 3178

31. 838 - TD 4465 (SDR)

CAT 3215

UTC

3650

Operator:

Consumers Power

DND

664

CIN5 3255

TRN 3550

Farm: Det. Hse. of Cor. #3

DTR 797

PN: 19496

A2C 2665

Sec. 17, T18, 383

A23 2840

SW¥N3-SE

CLN 3120

El. 900 - TD 5483 (SDR)

CAT 3160

UTC

3550

BLR 4282

cm 477:.

PDC 4782

Operator:

Consumers Power DND

594

CIN5 3264

TRN 3867

Farm: Det. Hse. of Cor. #4 DTR 728

'

PN: 19730

A2C 2639

Sec. 17, T18,R83

NW-SE-NW

31. 841 - TD 4498 (SDR)

CAT 3168

UTC

3580

Operator:

Taggart

DND

660

CIN5 3289

TRN 3885

Farm: George et a1 #1

DTR 815

PN: 19329

A20 2614

'

Sec. 18, T18, R83

SW-NE-NE

A23 2800

CLN 3126

BLR 4339

GLW 4822

.

PDC 4829

31. 861 - TD 5130 (SDR)

CAT 3158

UTC

3591

Operator:

Consumers Power DND

661

CIN5 3234

TRN 3832

Farm: Forbes #1

PN: 19541

Sec. 21, T18, R83

DTR

789

A2C 2589

NE-NW-NW

CLN 3080

81. 879 -TD.4429 (SDR)

CAT 3122

,

UTC 3565

BLR 4267

Operator:

Consumers Power DND

594

CIN5 3197

TRN 3762

Farm:

Millard et a1 #1

BLR 4210

PN: 19578

A20 2552

Sec. 21, T18, R83

A23 2727

SW-NE-NE

CLN 3039

31. 854 - TD 4337 (SDR)

CAT 3085

UTC 3457

116

Wayne County (continued)

Operator:

Consumers Power

DND

597

CIN5

3176

TRN

3774

Farm:

CPCO Elvidge #1

DTR

707

CIN4

3206

PN: 18946

A20

2533

CIN3 3290

Sec. 22, T18, R83

A23

2708

CIN2

3364

NW—NE-SW

3034

CIN1

3392

El. 781 - TD 3806 (GRL)

CAT

3066

UTC

3475

Operator:

Consumers Power

DND

605

CIN5

3176

3774

Farm:

Elvidge #1

PN: 18946

Sec. 22, T18, R83

NW-NE-SW

DTR

717

A2C

2522

A23

2714

3035

31. 809 - TD 4363 (SDR)

CAT

3072

UTC 3434

BLR

4212

Operator:

Consumers Power

DND

575

CIN5 3278

3841

Farm:

Webber #1

BLR

4244

PN: 19936

AZC

2615

Sec. 22, T18, R83

C-NW-

31. 826 — TD 4285 (SDR)

CAT

3175

UTC

3570

Operator:

Consumers Power

DND

542

CIN5

3227

TRN

3813

Farm: Raetzal Comm. #1

BLR

4186

PN: 19907

Sec. 22, T18, R83

'N-N-SE

31. 787 - TD 4240 (SDR)

AZC

2581

3093

CAT

3115

Operator:

Consumers Power

DND

574

CIN5

3210

TRN

3771

Farm:

CPCO #208

680

CIN4

3230

BLR

4179

PN: 25538

A2C

2562

CIN3

3316

Sec. 22, T18, R83

A23

2740

CIN2

3372

NW‘NW-SE

31. 800 - TD 4210 (GRL)

3064

3098

CIN1

3390

UTC

3480

Operator: Peake

DND

475

CIN5

3132

TRN

3729

Farm:

Wayne Co. #1

DTR

607

BLR

4156

PN: 21682

Sec. 23, T18, R83

SWeNW-SE

A2C

2484

A23

2646

CLN

2982

31. 713 - TD 4506 (SDR)

CAT

3005

Operator:

Albers

DND

544

CIN5

3176

TRN

3717

Farm:

C&0 RR #2

PN: 20794

Sec. 23, T18, R83

675

A2C

2530

SW‘NW‘SW

3016

31. 770 - TD 4257 (SDR)

CAT

3050

BLR

4128

117

Wayne County (continued)

Operator:

Consumers Power

DND

508

CIN5

3099

Farm:

Burroughs

Corp.#4

.DTR

641

PN: 26024

Sec. 24, T18, R83

SE-SE-SW

A2C

2482

A23

2636

2960

31. 729 - TD 4305 (SDR)

UTC

3408

3702

BLR

4146

Operator:

Peake

Farm:

Zittel #1

DND

530

CIN5

3056

TRN

3656

631

CIN4

3095

BLR 4096

PN: 22978

A2C

2437

CIN3

3182

Sec. 25, T18, R83

A23

2618

CIN2

3253

SWHSWBNE

2927

CIN1

3279

31. 717 - TD 4369 (GRL)

CAT

2957

UTC

3365

Operator:

Peake

DND

498

CIN5

3024

3620

Farm:

Wayne Co.Rd.Com.#4

DTR

613

CIN4

3054

BLR 4064

PN: 23638

A2C

1196

CIN3

3156

Sec. 25, T18, R83

A23

1362

CIN2

3234

NW-SE-SE

CLN

2886

CIN1

3256

31. 690 'TD 4118 (GRL)

CAT

2915

UTC

3322

Operator:

Peake

DND

467

CIN5

3028

3624

Farm: Wayne Co.Rd.Com.#2

DTR

590

CIN4

3061

BLR 4030

PN: 22341

A2C

2395

CIN3

3149

Sec. 26, T18, R83

A23

2566

CIN2

3218

NW—NE-NE

2887

CIN1

3244

El. 683 - TD 4123 (GRL)

CAT

2920

UTC

3330

Operator:

Consumers Power

DND

484

CIN5

3006

Farm:

Holman #1

DTR

604

CIN4

3028

TRN 3597

BLR 4036

PN: 26016

A2C

2393

CIN3

3110

Sec. 30,T13, R93

A23

2570

CIN2

3183

SW-SW¥SW

2864

CIN1

3215

31. 706 - TD 4187 (GRL)

CAT

2895

UTC

3296

Operator:

Peake

DND

426

CIN5

2940

3525

Farm:

Wayne Co.Rd.Com.#3

DTR

546

CIN4

2959

BLR

3940

PN: 23362

A2C

2310

CIN3

3041

Sec. 32, T18, R93

A23

2483

CIN2

3111

NWereNW

'

2797

CIN1

3131

El. 654 - TD 3986 (GRL)

CAT

2827

UTC

3228

Operator:

Spidel

DND

868

CIN5

3150

TRN

3758

Farm:

Spicer #1

PN: 19634

AZC

2532

Sec. 6, T28, R83

SW‘NW-SW

31. 795 - TD 4115(SDR)

118

Wayne County (continued)

Operator:

Petrolia

DND

736

CIN 5 3134

TRN 3723

Farm:

Fowler

'

PN: 19379

Sec. 7, T28, R83

NW-SE-NW

A2C 2495

A23 2673

CLN 3002

31. 791 - TD 4252 (SDR)

CAT 3015

Operator:

Darke Bros.

DND

220

CIN5 2660

TRN 3240

Farm:

Truesdell #1

PN: 3813

Sec.25, T25, R83

SW-SW-SW

CLN 2520

31. 658 - TD 3600 (SDR)

CAT 2540

Operator:

None listed

DND

125

CIN5

2490

TRN 3065

Farm:

Ford #1

DTR 215

PN: None listed

Sec. 22, T28, T103

NE-NW;SE

31. 612 - TD 3960 (SDR)

CAT 2355

TRM 3940

Operator: Panhandle Eastern DND -

CIN5 2413

'

TRN 2990

Farm:

Fomoco #1

DTR 195

CIN4 2422

BLR 3400

PN: 25560

AZC 1780

CIN3 2473

GLW 3866

Sec. 19, T28, T113

A23 1932

CIN2 2546

TRM§3882

W-SE

CLN 2261

CIN1 2590

'

31. 588 - TD 3917 (GRL)

CAT 2294

UTC

2695

Operator:

Leatherman

TRN 2830

Farm:

Scheffler

PN: 3265

Sec. 26, T38, R83

SE-SW-NE

31. 667 - TD 2960 (SDR)

Operator:

Lancy & Churchill

CIN5 2000

TRN 2500

Farm:

Bcorse Twp. #1

PN:

None

Sec. 34, T3S, R113

W

31. 593 - TD 2610 (SDR)

Operator:

Bonanza Oil

DND -

CIN5 1960

TRN 2483

Farm:

DeRoy #1

PN: 5830

Sec. 22, T48, R83

S-SW-SE

31. 642 - TD 2560 (SDR)

CAT 1808

119

Wayne County (continued)

Operator:

Uhl

DND

--

CIN5 1887

TRN 2425

Farm:

'Kuehl #1

DTR

65

PN: 19214

Sec. 26, T48, R83

NW-NW-SW

CLN 1715

31. 637 - TD 2827 (SDR)

CAT 1734

Opr:

Pontchartrain Petrol. DND --

CIN5 1810

.

TRN 2440

Farm:

Boynton #1

PN: 3701

Sec. 27, T48, R83

NW-SE-NE

31. 640 - TD 2566 (SDR)

Operator:

McClure

DND

--

CIN5 1961

TRN 2550

Farm:

Fritsch et a1 #1

DTR

87

PN: 19260

Sec. 1, T48, R93

N3-N3-83

CLN 1827

31. 621 - TD 2885 (SDR)

CAT 1838

Operator:

Voorhees

DND

--

CIN5 2090

TRN 2640

Farm:

Poet #1

PN: 10211

.

,

Sec. 6, T43, R93

N3-SW‘SW

31. 642 - TD 2955 (SDR)

Operator:

Sun

DND -

CIN5 1975

TRN 2564

Farm:

Haener et a1 #1

DTR

79

PN: 11746

A20 1330

Sec. 9, T48, R93

NE-SWeSW

CLN 1848

31. 632 - TD 2942 (SDR)

CAT 1865

Operator:

Colvin Assoc.

DND

--

CIN5 1875

TRN 2445

Farm:

Theisan #1

PN: 10430

See. 16, T48, R93

N3-S3-33

~

BLR 2860

GLW 3300

31. 625 - TD 4028 (SDR)

CAT 1715

UTC

2280

Operator:

MacCallum

DND

76

CIN5 1980

TRN 2515

Farm:

Gumtow #1

DTR

135

PN: 10877

See. 17, T48, R93

C-SW-NW

CLN 1810

31. 633 - TD 2610 (SDR)

UTC

2345

120

Wayne County (continued)
 

Operator:

Acme

DND

CIN5

1890

TRN 2564

Farm: Dolbozq #1

PN: 10099

Sec. 18, T4S, R93

NW-NE-NE

El. 635 - TD 2800 (SDR)

CAT

Operator: Voorhees

DND

CIN5

1880

TRN 2526

Farm:

Otter #1

PN: 9546

Sec. 18, T4S, R93

NE—SW—NE

El. 637 - TD 2733 (SDR)

Operator:

Marathon

DND

CIN5

1752

TRN 2361

Farm:

Marathon #1

DTR

47

CIN4

1774

BLR 2758

PN: BD #146

A2C

1155

CIN3

1814

GLW 3193

Sec. 22, T48, R103

A23

1249

CIN2"

1925

PDC 3206

N-SE

CLN

1620

CIN1

1949

El. 609 - TD 3752 (GRL)

CAT

1636

UTC

12015

Opr: Penn.Salt Mfg.Co.#14

Farm: None

PN: None

Sec. 6, T4S, R113

SE

DND

DTR

CIN5

1910

TRN 2504

31. 600 - TD 3368 (SDR)

CAT

1794

HIC HIGRN STATE UIN V.

11111 1999111111 11|11111|1|1||11119119|111|Es